20150065 Ver 1_401 Application_20150115

Kimley » >Horn
January 15, 2015
Mr David Shaeffer
US Army Corps of Engineers
Raleigh Regulatory Field Office
3331 Heritage Trade Drive, Suite 105
Wake Forest, NC 27587
Ms Karen Higgins
NC Division of Water Resources
401 & Buffer Permitting Unit
512 North Salisbury Street
Raleigh, NC 27604
2 0 1 5 0 0 0 5
RE Nationwide Permit 12, 13, and 27 Application — City of Raleigh Public Utilities Department
Royal Oak Dr, Foxwood Dr, and Dupree St Water /Sewer Re locations, Wake County,
North Carolina
Dear Mr Shaeffer and Ms Higgins
On behalf of the City of Raleigh Public Utilities Department, Kimley -Horn is submitting the attached
application for authorization under Nationwide Permits (NWP) 12, 13, and 27 for the above
referenced project The project consists of three locations Area # 1, Area # 2, and Area # 3 (See
Figure 1 Vicinity Map for project locations) At Areas #1 and #2, the City of Raleigh proposes to
relocate and improve existing water and sewer lines that are currently within existing roadway right -
of -way to improve connectivity and system reliability in the vicinity At Area #3, the City of Raleigh
proposes to restore severe erosion and multiple bank failures along Reedy Branch (shown as stream
S4 on the attached figures), and to relocate an existing sewer line out of the current alignment within
the stream channel and bank to within an existing maintained utility corridor adjacent to Reedy
Branch There is one jurisdictional wetland (W1) and two jurisdictional perennial streams within the
project area (S4 and S5)
A preliminary jurisdictional determination was issued for the project by David Shaeffer of the US Army
Corps of Engineers (USACE) on August 13, 2014 and a buffer determination was issued for the
project by the NC Division of Water Resources (NCDWR) on September 19, 2014 Documentation of
these determinations has been included for your reference
The following information is included as part of the application
• PCN Application Form
• Signed Agent Authorization
• Vicinity Map
• USGS Topographic Map

Kim9ey >>Morn
• Aerial Photograph and Jurisdictional Features Map
• USDA/NRCS Soil Survey Map
• Wake County Property Parcel Map
• FEMA Floodplain Map
• Proposed Stream, Wetland, and Buffer Impact Map
• Buffer Determination Letter
• Signed Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination
• Plan Sheets
• NCDWR 401 Application Fee of $570
Page 2
If there is any additional information you need to assist in the processing of this NWP application,
please do not hesitate to contact me at 919 - 678 -4155 or Jason Hartshorn @ Kim ley- Horn com
Sincerely,
"/ / 11A
Jason Hartshorn
Environmental Analyst
Cc Ms Rachelle Rhodes, P E , City of Raleigh Public Utilities Department
�91�9'�67�47�2000'

jO'FywA
4 r
Office Use Only
Corps action ID no
DWQ project no
Form Version 1 3 Dec 10 2008
Page 1 of 14
PCN Form — Version 1 3 December 10, 2008 Version
Pre - Construction Notification PCN Form
A. Applicant Information
1
Processing
1 a
Type(s) of approval sought from the
Corps
®Section 404 Permit El Section 10 Permit
1 b Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number 12, 13, & 27 or General Permit (GP) number
1 c
Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corpse
❑ Yes ® No
1d
Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply)
N 401 Water Quality Certification — Regular ❑ Non -404 Jurisdictional General Permit
❑ 401 Water Quality Certification — Express N Riparian Buffer Authorization
1 e
Is this notification solely for the record
because written approval is not required?
For the record only for DWQ 401
Certification
❑ Yes N No
For the record only for Corps Permit
❑ Yes ® No
1f
Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for mitigation
of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank or in -lieu
fee program
❑ Yes ® No
1g
Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties If yes, answer 1 h
below
❑ Yes ® No
1h
Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)?
❑ Yes ® No
2
Project Information
2a
Name of project
Royal Oak Dr, Foxwood Dr, and Dupree St Water /Sewer Relocation
2b
County
Wake County
2c
Nearest municipality / town
Raleigh and Garner
2d
Subdivision name
n/a
2e
NCDOT only, T I P or state
project no
n/a
3
Owner Information
3a
Name(s) on Recorded Deed
City of Raleigh Public Utilities Department (linear utility easement)
3b
Deed Book and Page No
n/a
3c
Responsible Party (for LLC if
applicable)
Rachelle Rhodes, P E
3d
Street address
1 Exchange Plaza, Suite 620 1 no
R
3e
City, state, zip
Raleigh, NC 27602 �° 1
3f
Telephone no
919 - 996 -3476 JAN 1 6 2o15
3g
Fax no
919- 996 -1866
3h
Email address
Rachelle Rhodes @raleighnc gov 4018 BUFFeR RESOURC�s
Tv
Page 1 of 14
PCN Form — Version 1 3 December 10, 2008 Version

4
Applicant Information (if different from owner)
4a
Applicant is
® Agent ❑ Other, specify
4b
Name
n/a
4c
Business name
(if applicable)
n/a
4d
Street address
n/a
4e
City, state, zip
n/a
4f
Telephone no
n/a
4g
Fax no
n/a
4h
Email address
n/a
5
Agent/Consultant Information (if applicable)
5a
Name
Jason Hartshorn
5b
Business name
(if applicable)
Kimley -Horn and Associates, Inc
5c
Street address
3001 Weston Parkway
5d
City, state, zip
Cary, North Carolina 27513
5e
Telephone no
919- 677 -2121
5f
Fax no
919 - 677 -2050
5g
Email address
Jason Hartshorn @Kimley -Horn com
Page 2 of 14
PCN Form — Version 1 3 December 10, 2008 Version

B
Project Information and Prior Project History
1
Property Identification
1a
Property identification no (tax PIN or parcel ID)
n/a
1 b
Site coordinates (in decimal degrees)
Latitude 35 706623 Longitude - 78 617097
(DD DDDDDD) ( -DD DDDDDD)
1c
Property size
4 48 acres
2
Surface Waters
2a
Name of nearest body of water (stream, river, etc ) to
proposed project
Reedy Branch
2b
Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water
WS -II, NSW
2c
River basin
Neuse
Page 3 of 14
PCN Form — Version 1 3 December 10, 2008 Version

3
Project Description
3a
Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this
application
The project area consists of three locations Area #1 is located Buck Branch Drive and Royal Oak Drive within a low -
density residential area The project limits at Area #1 are entirely within existing roadway right -of -way Area #2 is located
along Foxwood Drive, 1000' east of Area #1, and is also located within a low- density residential area The project limits at
Area #2 are also entirely within existing roadway right -of -way Area #3 is located within a current City of Raleigh utility
corridor along Reedy Branch, south of LIS -70, northwest of Dupree Street Land use in the vicinity of Area #3 consists of
primarily low- density residential and commercial development The project corridor is primarily maintained utility
easement (herbaceous dominated), but is bordered by forested areas between residential and commercial developments
3b
List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property
002
3c
List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property
502 linear feet
3d
Explain the purpose of the proposed project
The proposed project will relocate and improve utility service at Areas #1 and #2, and at Area #3, the project will restore
severe erosion and multiple bank failures along Reedy Branch and will relocate an existing sewer line out of the current
location within the stream channel and bank to within an existing maintained utility corridor adjacent to Reedy Branch
The stream has downcut significantly at Area #3, throughout the project area, leading to multiple large bank failures and
allowing Reedy Branch to migrate over and on top of the sewer line such that the sewer now runs along the center of the
stream and is exposed at multiple points within the channel The City of Raleigh is also experiencing significant
groundwater intrusion into the sewer line as a result, and the project seeks to correct this failure and restore the stream
channel to prevent further erosion and degredation
3e
Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used
The project proposes to relocate existing water and sewer lines at Area #1 that are currently beneath the existing
roadway to improve connectivity and system reliability in the area At Area #2, the existing sewer line will be adandoned
in place and relocated to within the existing roadway corridor to better align the sewer with property boundaries as
required by law At Area #3, the existing sewer line will be relocated from within the stream channel to the existing
maintained utility corridor adjacent to Reedy Branch (stream S4) As part of the relocation project, the City of Raleigh will
restore and stabilize much of the length of Reedy Branch within the project area to provide a long -term and reliable repair
to the currently severely degraded stream channel Beginning at the northeast end of the alignment, the sewer will be
realigned at the existing manhole to the south, away from the stream and into the existing utility corridor The sewer will
run along the utility corridor to the existing access road stemming from Dupree Street, where it will turn and cross Reedy
Branch with a perpendicular crossing The sewer will then continue along the right bank of Reedy Branch, again in an
existing maintained utility corridor, south towards the existing overhead utility easement Once at the overhead utility
easement corridor, the new alignment will then cross Reedy Branch back onto the left bank with a perpendicular crossing,
tying into an existing manhole well outside of the stream channel The City of Raleigh will also relocate a sewer line also
within stream S5 currently running along the southwestern side of the overhead utility corridor The proposed new
alignment will be on the northeastern side of the overhead utility corridor, entirely out of buffer zone 1, and only within
buffer zone 2 for a short distance
As part of the sewer line relocation activities at Area #3, the City of Raleigh will also restore and stabilize the heavily
degraded stream channel of Reedy Branch Multiple bank failures have occurred along this reach, and the City proposes
to lay the banks back and stabilze them at a 3 1 slope The City will also install a constructed 'rock and roll' riffle structure
along the reach where the proposed perpendicular sewer crossing of Reedy Branch will be located The constructed riffle
structure will provide long -term stability for the channel and prevent erosion by slowing velocity and dissipating energy
within the stream channel in an armored structure
To construct this project at Areas #1, #2, and #3, the City of Raleigh will utilize typical stream restoration, utility line, and
road construction equipment including excavators, dump trucks, pavers, graders, bull dozers, compactors, and front end
loaders
Page 4 of 14
PCN Form — Version 1 3 December 10, 2008 Version

4
Jurisdictional Determinations
4a
Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the
Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property /
project (including all prior phases) in the past?
Comments A preliminary JD was approved by USACE PM
®Yes E:1 No ❑ Unknown
David Shaeffer on August 13, 2014 The USACE Action ID is
SAW- 2014 - 01472, and documentation is attached NCDWR
issued a buffer determination for the site on September 19,
2014 (NBRRO #14 -291)
4b
If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination, what type
® Preliminary ❑ Final
of determination was made?
4c
If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas?
Agency /Consultant Company Kimley -Horn & Associates
Name (if known) Jason Hartshorn
Other
4d
If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation
USACE PM David Shaeffer issued the preliminary JD on August
13, 2014 James Graham with NCDWR verified the site
and issued the stream determination on September 19, 2014 Documentation of both determinations is attached
5
Project History
5a
Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for
❑ Yes ® No ❑ Unknown
this project (including all prior phases) in the past?
5b
If yes, explain in detail according to "help file" instructions
n/a
6
Future Project Plans
6a
Is this a phased project?
❑ Yes ® No
6b
If yes, explain
All three project areas will be constructed concurrently
Page 5 of 14
PCN Form — Version 1 3 December 10, 2008 Version

C Proposed Impacts Inventory
1 Impacts Summary
la Which sections were completed below for your project (check all that apply)
® Wetlands ® Streams - tributaries ® Buffers
❑ Open Waters ❑ Pond Construction
Page 6 of 14
PCN Form — Version 1 3 December 10, 2008 Version

2 Wetland Impacts
If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted
2a
2b
2c
2d
2e
2f
Wetland impact
Type of jurisdiction
number —
Type of impact
Type of wetland
Forested
(Corps - 404, 10
Area of impact
Permanent (P) or
(if known)
DWQ — non -404, other)
(acres)
Temporary T
W1 ® P F-1 T
Conversion
(Forested to
Riverine
® Yes
❑ No
® Corps
DWQ
002
Herbaceous)
W2 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
W3 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
W4 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
W5 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
W6 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
2g. Total wetland impacts
002
2h Comments Unavoidable impacts will result to wetland W1 due to the expansion of the existing utility corridor adjacent to
Reedy Branch The wetland is a small forested wetland that is supported by stormwater input from upslope commercial
development that is impounded at the existing utility easement Relocating the sewer line and laying back the stream bank will
require that the cleared area for the utility corridor be expanded away from the stream channel, and the cleared area will then
be maintained Wetland W1 will persist as an herbaceous dominated wetland once construction is complete
3 Stream Impacts
If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this
question for all stream sites impacted
3a
3b
3c
3d
3e
3f
3g
Stream impact
Type of impact
Stream name
Perennial
Type of jurisdiction
Average
Impact
number -
(PER) or
(Corps - 404, 10
stream
length
Permanent (P) or
intermittent
DWQ — non -404,
width
(linear
Temporary (T)
(INT)?
other)
(feet)
feet)
SA ® P ❑ T
Bank stabilization
Reedy Branch
(S4)
® PER
❑ INT
® Corps
❑ DWQ
15
247
SB ®P F-1 T
Stream restoration
Reedy Branch
(S4)
® PER
El INT
® Corps
El DWQ
20
147
SC ®P ❑ T
Bank stabilization
Reedy Branch
(S4)
® PER
❑ INT
® Corps
❑ DWQ
15
181
SD ® P ❑ T
Bank stabilization
Reedy Branch
(S4)
® PER
❑ INT
® Corps
❑ DWQ
20
95
SE E] PH T
Construction Access
Reedy Branch
(S4)
® PER
E:1 INT
® Corps
❑ DWQ
15
41
SF ® P ❑ T
Stream Restoration
UT to Reedy
® PER
® Corps
10
50
(Pipe Removal)
Branch (S5)
❑ INT
❑ DWQ
SG ❑ P ®T
Construction Access
UT to Reedy
Branch (S5)
® PER
❑ INT
® Corps
❑ DWQ
10
41
720 LF
3h Total stream and tributary impacts
Permanent
82 LF
Temporary
31 Comments Permanent stream impacts will result throughout the project corridor due to the stream restoration and
streambank stabilization measures that are proposed to repair the heavily degraded reach of Reedy Branch Removing the
sewer line and relocating it well outside of the stream banks while also laying back the stream banks and installing a
Page 7 of 14
PCN Form — Version 1 3 December 10, 2008 Version

constructed riffle /pool sequence will serve to protect this stream well into the future and overall will improve the stream system
both within the project area and in downstream receiving waters
4 Open Water Impacts
If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of
the U S then individually list all open water impacts below
4a
Open water
impact number
— Permanent
(P) or
Temporary T
4b
Name of waterbody
(if applicable)
4c
Type of impact
4d
Waterbody type
4e
Area of impact (acres)
01 ❑P ❑T
02 ❑P ❑T
03 ❑P ❑T
04 ❑ PEI T
417 Total open water impacts
0
4g Comments No open water impacts will result from the proposed project
5 Pond or Lake Construction
If pond or lake construction proposed, then complete the chart below
5a
Pond ID
number
5b
Proposed use or purpose of
pond
5c
Wetland Impacts (acres)
5d
Stream Impacts (feet)
5e
Upland
(acres)
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
Flooded
P1
P2
517 Total
5g Comments No ponds or lakes will be constructed by the proposed project
5h Is a dam high hazard permit required
❑ Yes No If yes, permit ID no
51 Expected pond surface area (acres)
n/a
51 Size of pond watershed (acres)
n/a
5k Method of construction
n/a
Page 8 of 14
PCN Form — Version 1 3 December 10, 2008 Version

6 Buffer Impacts (for DWQ)
If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below If yes, then individually list all buffer impacts
below If any impacts require mitigation, then you MUST fill out Section D of this form
6a
® Neuse ❑Tar- Pamlico El Other
Project is in which protected basin?
❑ Catawba ❑ Randleman
6b
6c
6d
6e
6f
6g
Buffer impact
number—
Reason for impact
Buffer
Zone 1 impact
Zone 2 impact
Permanent (P)
Stream name
mitigation
(square feet)
(square feet)
or Temporary
required?
T
Site 1 ® P ❑
T
Bank stabilization
Reedy Branch (S4)
❑ Yes
® No
11,0984
1,6205
Site ,2 ® P ❑
T
Bank stabilization
Reedy Branch (S4)
® Yes
os
11,7361
2,8529
Site 3 ❑ P ®
Construction in
Reedy Branch (S4)
❑ Yes
1,0102
353
T
Existing Easement
® No
Site 4 ® P ❑
Easement
Reedy Branch (S4)
Yes
0
191 9
T
Construction
® os
Site 5 ❑ P ®
Construction in
UT to Reedy Branch
❑ Yes
1,3172
4432
T
Existing Easement
(S5)
® No
Site 6 ❑ P ®
Construction in
UT to Reedy Branch
❑ Yes
9973 3
3,800 6
T
Existing Easement
(S5)
® No
Site 7 ® P ❑
Easement
UT to Reedy Branch
❑ Yes
0
8484
T
Construction
(S5)
® No
6h Total buffer impacts
35,1352
9,7928
61 Comments Unavoidable impacts will result to the riparian buffers associated with Reedy Branch and the UT to Reedy
Branch due to the streambank stabilization measures proposed by the City of Raleigh as part of the utility relocation The
utility line will be realigned within existing maintained utility corridor adjacent to Reedy Branch, but the banks will be layed
back at a 3 1 slope to better stabilize and protect the stream channel Temporary impacts will reuult to the buffers at Sites 3, 5,
and 6 due to construction acitivies occuring within existing maintained utility easements
D Impact Justification and Mitigation
1 Avoidance and Minimization
1a Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project
Impacts have been avoided to the greatest extent practical at Areas #1 and #2 by keeping the project limits entirely within
existing right -of -way No jurisdictional features will be impacted at areas #1 or #2 At Area #3, impacts have been limited to
within the existing utility corridor and easements where practical, and impacts beyond the existing maintained areas will result
from streambank stabilization measures meant to increase water quality and environmental health in this area
1 b Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques
Impacts to streams and wetlands within the corridor will be minimized to the extent practical throughout the construction
process by avoiding stream and wetland features wherever possible Wetland W1 will be impacted by the proposed project but
only due to forested conversion impacts The wetland will still remain as an herbaceous dominated wetland once construction
is complete Where feasible, staging and construction access routes will be located in upland areas throughout the corridor
Tree protection fencing, silt fencing, and other standard Best Management Practices (BMPs) and measures will be used
throughout the construction process to minimize impacts to downstream receiving waters and minimize runoff from the
construction sites
Page 9 of 14
PCN Form — Version 1 3 December 10, 2008 Version

2
Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U S or Waters of the State
2a
Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for
impacts to Waters of the U S or Waters of the State?
❑ Yes ® No
2b If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply)
❑ DWQ ❑ Corps
2c
If yes, which mitigation option will be used for this project?
❑ Mitigation bank
❑ Payment to in -lieu fee program
❑ Permittee Responsible Mitigation
3
Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank
3a
Name of Mitigation Bank n/a
3b Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter)
Type n/a
Quantity n/a
3c Comments n/a
4
Complete if Making a Payment to In -lieu Fee Program
4a
Approval letter from in -lieu fee program is attached
❑ Yes
4b
Stream mitigation requested
n/a linear feet
4c
If using stream mitigation, stream temperature
❑ warm ❑ cool ❑cold
4d
Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only)
n/a square feet
4e
Riparian wetland mitigation requested
n/a acres
4f
Non - riparian wetland mitigation requested
n/a acres
4g
Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested
n/a acres
4h
Comments n/a
5
Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
5a
If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan
n/a
6
Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) — required by DWQ
6a
Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires
buffer mitigation?
❑ Yes ® No
6b
If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation Calculate the
amount of mitigation required
Zone
6c
Reason for impact
6d
Total impact
(square feet)
Multiplier
6e
Required mitigation
(square feet)
Zone 1
n/a
n/a
3 (2 for Catawba)
n/a
Zone 2
n/a
n/a
1 5
n/a
6f Total buffer mitigation required
0
6g
If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e g , payment to private mitigation bank,
permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in -lieu fee fund)
n/a
Page 10 of 14
PCN Form — Version 1 3 December 10, 2008 Version

6h Comments Buffer mitigation is not required for the unavoidable impacts proposed by this project as the impacts are a
result of stream restoration activities and bank stabilization construction that will serve to repair and improve this heavily
degraded section of stream channel The project will also relocated the existing sewer line out of the stream channels and
into existing utility corridors adjacent to the streams Overall this project will improve water quality in this area and within
downstream receiving waters due to reduced sediment loads, improved aquatic habitat, and reduced risk of sewage
spills
Page 11 of 14
PCN Form — Version 1 3 December 10, 2008 Version

E
Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ)
1
Diffuse Flow Plan
1 a
Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified
® Yes ❑ No
within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
lb
If yes, then is a diffuse flow plan included? If no, explain why
Comments A specific plan is not provided However, no new stormwater outlets are
❑ Yes ® No
proposed as part of the enclosed plans The project will not concentrate or
discharge flow within the protected riparian buffers
2
Stormwater Management Plan
2a
What is the overall percent imperviousness of this project?
<1 %
2b
Does this project require a Stormwater Management Plan?
❑ Yes ® No
2c
If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why The proposed construction will not be
increasing impervious surface area within the project No new stormwater structures will result from the construction
2d
If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan, then provide a brief, narrative
description of the plan
n/a
® Certified Local Government
2e
Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan?
❑ DWQ Stormwater Program
❑ DWQ 401 Unit
3
Certified Local Government Stormwater Review
3a
In which local government's jurisdiction is this project?
Garner
® Phase II
3b
Which of the following locally - implemented stormwater management programs
® NSW
El USMP
apply (check all that apply)
® Water Supply Watershed
❑ Other
3c Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
❑ Yes ® No
attached?
4
DWQ Stormwater Program Review
❑ Coastal counties
❑ HQW
4a
Which of the following state - implemented stormwater management programs apply
❑ ORW
(check all that apply)
❑ Session Law 2006 -246
® Other Diffuse Flow
4b
Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
attached?
❑ Yes ® No
5
DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review
5a
Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements?
® Yes ❑ No
5b
Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met?
® Yes ❑ No
Page 12 of 14
PCN Form — Version 1 3 December 10, 2008 Version

F Supplementary Information
1 Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement)
la Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal /state /local) funds or the
® Yes ❑ No
use of public (federal /state) land?
lb If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an
environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State
❑ Yes ® No
(North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
1c If you answered "yes" to the above, has the document review been finalized by the
State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval
❑ Yes ❑ No
letter )
Comments n/a
2 Violations (DWQ Requirement)
2a Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H 0500), Isolated
Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H 1300), DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards,
❑ Yes ® No
or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B 0200)?
2b Is this an after - the -fact permit application?
❑ Yes ® No
2c If you answered "yes" to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s) n/a
3 Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement)
3a Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in
❑ Yes ® No
additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?
3b If you answered "yes" to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the
most recent DWQ policy If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description
The proposed project will repair a heavily degraded stream reach and realign existing utility lines in the project areas No
new development will result from this construction
4 Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement)
4a Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non - discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from
the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility
The proposed construction will not generate any wastewater, but will convey existing flows through the area, but within a
safer and more reliable alignment
Page 13 of 14
PCN Form — Version 1 3 December 10, 2008 Version

5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or
❑ Yes ® No
habitat9
5b Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act
Yes ® No
impacts?
5c If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted
E:1 Raleigh
❑ Asheville
5d What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical
Habitat?
A review the NC Natural Heritage Program database records (updated October 2014) found no known occurrences of
any federally listed threatened or endgangerd species within the project area or within 1 0 mile of the project area
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat?
❑ Yes ® No
6b What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat?
A review of the EFH Mapper found on the NMFS website found that no EFH is present within the project vicinity
7 Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal
governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation
❑ Yes ® No
status (e g , National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in
North Carolina history and archaeology)?
7b What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?
The NC State Historic Properties Office HPOWEB GIS Mapping Application was reviewed in January 2015 and found that
no historic resources are present within the study area
8 Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a Will this project occur in a FEMA - designated 100 -year floodplain?
® Yes ❑ No
8b If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements The project proposes to relocate the existing sewer and is is not
anticipated that this project will create any rise in the 100 -year floodplain or otherwise impact a FEMA - designated area
8c What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination? FIRM Panel 1711 (Effective 5/2/2006)
Jason Haitshorn
/ 9,
January 15,
,,�—
2015
Applicant/Agent's Printed Name
Date
App cant/Agent's Signature
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant
is provided
Page 14 of 14
PCN Form – Version 1 3 December 10, 2008 Version

SIGNED AGENT
AUTHORIZATION

AGENT AUTHORIZATION FORM
Name- Rachelle Rhodes, City of Raleigh Public Utilities Department
Addiess _One Exchange Plaza, Suite 620, Raleigh, NC 27602
Phone: [phone]
Pioject Name/Desciiption: Royal Oak Dr, Foxwood Dr, and Dupree St Water /Sewer
Replacements
Date- 7/28/14
The Department of the Aimy
U.S. Aimy Corps of Engineeis, Wilmington District
Field Office: Raleigh
Re Wetland Related Consulting and Permitting
To Whom It May Concern
I hereby designate and authorize Kimley -Horn and Associates, Inc to act in my /our behalf as my /our
agent solely for the purpose of processing Juiisdictional Determinations, Section 404 permits /Section
401 Water Quality Ceitifications applications, and Neuse Rives Basin Riparian Buffer Determinations,
and to furnish upon request supplemental information in support of applications, etc fiom this day
forward until successful completion of the permitting process or revocation by the owner
In addition, I, the undersigned, a duly authorized owner of iecoid of the pioperty /properties identified
herein, do authorize representatives of the Wilmington District, U.S. Army Corps of Engineeis (Corps)
to enter upon the property herein described for the purpose of conducting on -site investigations and
issuing a determination associated with Waters of the U S subject to Fedetal jurisdiction under Section
404 of the Clean Water Act and /or Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of 1899
Authorized this the I. day of A06 P5 T_ , Zo 1 g
'?ACH-Fu 91APP65 C
Print Property Owner's Name Pro ert Owner's Signature
Cc- Karen Higgins
NC Division of Water Resources
401 & Buffer Permitting Unit
1650 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699 -1650

FIGURES

HENRY DR
AXUM RD
Area #1
ce,D
Area #2
0
� G{
L w r.
%v 2
�RNFR Rp
0
W A,nFlr ,
j
z
E .QC)OK" *VF-
Area #3
30
C.
ALIFAX rT
��IIAIKLI �
NASH J LAKESIDE OR
J
Project Location
AKE Legend
CHATHAM WILSON
ED Project Areas
JOHNSTON
0� 40
Ile WAYNE 0 1,000 2,000
Feet
Figure 1: Vicinity Map
CORPUD Water /Sewer Relocations
Garner, Wake County, NC
January 2015

%6 • — -• `�J
aaft
/� a `� • �, � • • _ y, � •
•
a
J,
f+ • fff • t` • i
3
0
• • • f. r '•• r �i J • •
f,` f Area #1 „� ;_ ff • • • : j t
•
• • • •
• • Sao i
• . • • • - Area #2
see IL
• f •,_ • ••irk ♦ • •• , 1 «' * •�'•
I • •' l• ♦ •• •a r I •� 1 • ' '� •I' •�• r
• r f Asa 1 � � �•�, ,;
IP
see + �` •. 2713 ' i • �\ ' f
•. �•• • n 91 ��; • • • ♦ !♦• �' • , • Area #3 • •
••
1. 'Poll •
(: • • • • . • • . •rte • • • • - ,�
r .• ••fir • •� • _ • • 4
•ice • 1 •, .••• ••••• •- •r;�A..
ON a
se
• • • r�
I �
.1• �•• ♦•� ; , +. J - ♦,•' Legend
0 500 1,000 • P • - � � • � • '
♦ 9 j ♦ • • • • •, •
Feet �♦ • a ! i •' • 1 • `. s • • ' If]
Areas
l •� • ~
Ff
• +•� • ♦ ••• l 1 •••} •�•• ��J –� • mot+ —y��.� _
.b .,.
Figure 2: USGS Topo Map (Lake Wheeler /Garner Quads, 1987)
CORPUD Water /Sewer Relocations
O , NC Garner, Wake Count
Y
January 2015

-A
!' 1W.
IT*N1
PO
n�1'00
....... 10
WWI 'PA
3.
-.Legend
I enend
0 50 100 150 200 ED Project Area
Feet
Igo ,1, 1. meMap. N Center fog Geographic lnformafiiom ndn 17Fis
NC =,eo
Figure 313: Area #2 Jurisdictional Features Map
rr CORPUD Water/Sewer Relocations
Garner, Wake County, NC
January 2015

Area #1
ntirely within Exisiting Pavement)
INNAN
Area #3
'
`'
Gn
APC
Ge
Ma ings Legend
Project Areas
r 0 750 1,500
Figure 4: NRCS Soil Survey Map (Wake County, 1970)
CORPUD Water/Sewer Relocations
Garner, Wake County, NC
January 2015

s �
AM
`.1•
Note: Project Area #1 is located entirely
within * existing right-of-wa
w • ,
Legend
Affected Parcels
Wake v County ■ D'
0 50 100 150 200 Project Area
Feet

WAKE PROPERTY INVESTME
PO BOX 388
PEACOCK, IRENE P HEIRS
KAREN P NORKUS, CO- EXECUTOR \
PIN: 1711 329347
GARNER TOWN OF
900 7TH AVE
PIN: 1711327491
PIN:1711324232
v
Wl
_; �
00
ES C ART ER c1Rli 1
CRER, JAMOR. VAvN0
A 9
501 1ti3159
BLACKCAP PROPERTIES LLC
401 AVERSBORO RD STE 100
PIN: 1711322084
_. _ .. iris - -- -- -
o .,
k ,
0
o�
J
t
t

A: t4 'SO'S 1 b ♦L� rr!} . �` . F ° o` .^ p , B • S . d ♦ lsti ♦�� A t3 ^►.►P ?►' ° ► ♦ ♦♦♦ ° `lE?a ~�y! A' ♦♦ si♦ f { ® 01
-7 ♦ #o t♦���
. �..��•.� - -. ..,F;..
s ►♦ �' S ♦°♦ e♦<♦ r0♦ 1� ''►♦♦ ♦°>60—f i♦ 4m♦(> P
i 740-0♦ �,♦♦ ♦ ♦Or-Mg, � - r'♦b
�. 0000♦! ` ►^ ♦s S.O . i00 ♦ ♦ <►!P
3 •.- ♦P< ♦ ♦A♦t-� a l t I1�t A R'A< i♦♦
A¢'♦♦or a �1 t i j <. e♦ �► ♦ °0 ��i., _( Tt ♦° a .�iA ,.0 9 �t t t `a4e ° ♦°♦°i♦ " ° i ♦e Ir 91I ♦ ,
4.1 ♦♦ �► ♦ ♦+►� ♦ > ♦Oi ♦ ♦6 ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦♦
AvAv
Av
♦�'ow @�►6�, !4. lLlr: ►� i+/`+ (! sAQv ♦t �ti,3r r► ♦i'? ♦i`♦w sy►► t>.► 1+► O♦♦♦ ee♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦ , ♦i ♦Q ♦ ♦i ♦ ♦i°d ♦�► ♦i ♦i0 ♦ ♦ ♦oi^aY "c s� �: !
ter► t3: _ ' , r�> 0► ♦ °o b2 ♦ ♦♦►oe�t� ♦< ' r !s ♦�°�i °i °s °OO °i °i ° ♦4 °i`'�Ji ° ♦C �i ?ZPisO °,►♦eo °i ° ♦ °0 <c�a" "�
Ai ♦,�♦�i!%`;z . R±:- ..�,ti♦ , ♦es♦i °i ♦ ♦ ♦ ►i�► ♦i .{f< ytA • �.♦Aii ♦ ♦♦♦o i a•'♦s >eaAo0°000♦♦ i 1
♦ ® +♦ � > ,�;y� �is>+�. w °♦♦ ♦°♦OWN o♦♦ +.fir t o <c e� ♦�i°♦ ♦o ♦♦ ♦♦ ♦o�t>sQm�o<� ® < ♦ ♦c`,,�a♦ ♦icy ♦♦ ♦ice♦ ,, .•
♦ ♦,1► ,► ► "' . ♦i ► d ♦ ♦ �`, gA ♦ °i0 °0 ♦i�♦� 4,e :t ��r., y°° ♦°��� °, ♦o °sO7yi °eAv1 r 49 ° ♦°i` �fi° °i °i ♦Q�: �'.
O♦ ♦a- ♦t!'♦♦`� ,lma�►♦' O bi ♦. y.V ♦♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ 6 4aA %` !�! +.♦�" ♦ o A ♦ ♦ +► ♦,�► 0 ♦�°� ♦e '� ., +°e ri,
4° ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦e ♦i i ♦ `o ` 0R. >' ♦►°Q >i. 1 "'94'r•♦♦♦♦ ♦<. F O- ,'i
►♦t i ►av�, o > ♦ ♦ ♦P` �►1 °iP ♦°♦6.s. .. '4r w�D♦ A!� s• ♦mit4.A ♦>i ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦•s i A
♦ °i! A ♦O� !e` ►� ►t . ►�+♦Qq, Mi.'s 1 t♦♦♦i ♦� ♦ ♦O °pe♦•,, `< ♦� ° ♦ °i°♦ ♦♦♦� = '^ x ♦O ,n ti ♦� ►►0911 °G`4 . ♦tie ♦ ♦♦♦ ♦!`�' �i ae+ �f
n. ♦br'11�1 ♦t?►Q s +l�►'Y ♦vy.o.. i♦ ♦ ♦9 ♦v P *o ♦e ► ♦ ♦1!♦♦ v b ♦'0i ♦°♦o °�+h 1:ii.
♦ O♦°i♦e♦Oii ♦ ♦�..♦Jr ♦ ♦ ♦♦ r ` i + s♦!`ot °O♦ ♦ °W °Oad-aS . ♦ ♦J�! °O°* ,t b, ♦r. ..
•, s ► ♦ ♦Q�•�r� 'i> °° > > '�.e' � *�o0°O t ® a A I � r 3 +!►Avtt�i wO♦�♦ deli ♦ ♦ ♦Zv ►�► ♦ ♦OsO..R�aa� r. 01 ♦ ♦� 4 !♦♦♦t7
� ♦�� .; - w ^�� ? e 5� ., ♦1 ♦1♦ ro 1,1 ` � �`!�� fJ vvA♦t s ♦std. 4.Od1C3 r : ;�1 ♦♦" ♦ia�. "�'� � ►i ♦ °o °e ♦a�� J� ♦!°�►�c,.
♦f ♦t`. R ' } .v i ♦ta1♦ ♦ 7.. vv i a . Qe `►♦♦ ♦ ♦Oi♦ ®'1 ♦''►p♦♦ t�tl; q
t" f i !y♦ O.+i� �' t�+ i ���♦ `t± ►i1♦ i ,♦ ly s.b +1 w r ♦�!.♦1►:� 1'1 ♦ ♦♦?♦�a +L ♦.Y �, ,♦°♦i♦ ♦a ♦� :�P'♦ • :1►
♦� ♦max !, € ♦ ♦♦ : � o��' ��1, a, ±\ ►`!* , ►'>1A,10r� ♦� (i� ? ♦�O�a ♦ +i�' �c Ali' ♦ ♦�♦A ♦, ♦.9jAA::!
1 ♦♦ �► • ,ir t , t►i♦°♦ ?vl.,pa °a.� , �.6 ." i �. -. � O a! a 0000 aa4R - ♦A ♦ ♦t►.� +�i•�
� 1 ♦1. .K •. ♦♦OF o;y ♦ � r ..
r � �Ot _ , • aa♦ �♦ r : O°♦ "�: • ♦t'o��' < ►�<.;. w y ``+ ` •s' ► ° ?� ♦`>OV ♦�•l♦♦���"� ;;4 (�t� `�,, a ♦�♦ ♦1e ° ♦,t♦���'s ♦.ws ►f ♦1♦�,�.. fl:�v � .
? t . r r♦° ♦tom. �v< +►♦ iQ pO"�rr ♦# t� . r wa 1 I ♦ ♦ ♦ ° ♦Q ♦ °♦ O♦ ° ♦ ° ♦O ♦4, t . ♦'►.. ` j0 ♦< w ae °t ►b�;, j0 ♦♦ +g♦ ♦ �''td
!♦♦�►♦ l ►v F►♦►°♦ i ♦1 '♦►♦ ♦♦ r Y '+ . +Y i °i°♦♦ ♦♦ ♦ ♦' a ®°♦ l� ♦°4. 4
>y9i►Oet %A ?��4QA�Ct/��s °!+ ♦ °?1 ^. ♦-• ° ♦E► �'>A�.a *` t E �►♦ MJ�i e� i�t� Yi t
d 1. lies AiA l�� F�fS ►° fp atr`� r �s.. +►a Sid ♦♦ A A .i . +e +► ° t/6ra'.. " ♦ / r
k 9► ►°° ri `♦ a <,. �,.► a iJt.f' a �, l'.►r i� i. ♦s ♦ tip♦ . ♦ ' ?♦ o
.' •'3♦ ♦fw���101�A „ >Alr 1 1 ! i * ^: 4� e ♦°♦!♦ a1. i `1it . ► ♦'v' >i�♦ ♦�♦ ► r }?
fa -wL ♦ ♦A t ',Aid ♦ ♦ °♦� ci � i--
•"a `•` ` Ap yi�a a.♦. �A� �.p � ! a+, 3 ♦_,aila i� e ► -
°► . �� :►ice <`; A, ,. ?y°iod`� c. ;;Q� <4 r # n 1i . >< <A, ♦ ♦e<i ,
` sP ,s s ♦°i� w`' r e?► ♦ ♦ 1°♦ ♦ • * ! .. -.'♦ lei v r , , di►S >,4 •►A ♦♦9pit i --
�' .Ot $°♦ ° ♦ °•!A ♦�/► Yv`�°s ►�QAQ 1 t r ) ♦t ♦ ;liA��► ♦�,a4 v S sy'�"'a ' i'O�` �i .r1 , • ♦ ♦1 t •s'tR tt ' ♦Q ♦c `
!tS :Clif! ♦O°v r.C96lA ♦lvA4 ^ �4f� •. .`4 ♦� ° �ti �C�►011`�rlti �"♦�+► x ~ip.►� , i *� °♦ `.
1 4y
v♦ g °!i►♦♦♦♦ A ♦ $`'� p ►� {, a� ► . �1a . ! , ��: .,,1 !► ► ►A"t► ♦t i i ei a�: +. e►♦♦ .�A°♦
► ►ems I�,►�,> ♦ ♦+P.l�s.�d ♦ ♦�i♦i1' ti�E�!+ i4i`'i.40��"+'., >z �,ri► ♦ ° /1R ♦iF`:x e' ;1 &►�eg4wc�l�Alo�.� ;7.�"►�pPJr10
}@ ♦talc ) A♦!< n°d► w 'i,. ,(+ ♦O�f,i� v�,,i��itFi �►� +.'f� !` `?: �F� +�� °,a� + , `� �a 1 alb °!c`• ► ♦Q `•,• °�°♦ it v`r�`�t►
FY C�ti� r♦ M ri ♦�itill�C ♦hc_.� sa Sri (ti '♦r 3 ► �i♦� �'viCll r
' i : i °lit ”` ✓ �1 ♦+ , ti .;a 4� t �, �.14 ' a• '' : Q ° �,►t;�►�t,►` ?� i�r1 ♦br r1 P rl�.y
°� r i� r ♦�t�'�� QwD ��_ ►�. * j'J �t4,ij s �: %� x�! s t O♦S
t'S d ° ♦ti ''� 1 tt' ,: ,♦° Ia ♦+iO♦ `try �'+1��4e �« * s . >�a °�w♦a ♦ _ +:,►O r rr ,.
e ! <► 5 f ♦ i^ °4 i rv♦�a'O ♦ A ! a�►�►�► a A -i r•;* , !
® ♦+� ,t !A +r4 ♦♦ ♦ t^t1t�ti toi ,� s h. �(.. gve���vO♦e1 ♦ ♦♦♦t,, at j� evA♦'�e
«, ♦♦C >6A
Area #1 < '`%:►
• .pA`�.r c, A .► ra ij ! A O 6 p ]�' b `i' � �` � � .. , ; t ♦ • 1,1 t a . %r�•a 'try.. ,y +l
s°os
f s v4 t. S °s ♦ ♦, s, a v Jai` �i� r `., 3 a :d �r� <4 ,e,! ,... r H h ♦ e
! >4, 3 ►i ♦�i♦ •r A ..: ► v °+ t t .a� w ♦ t o �► M : ♦ O♦
a►s 't +yrprl>,i,►°♦ °♦+1�•a °f ►�dA.t^ yt ♦'' `. �� °i.;� c+, ®' '.,.., r, en'�yls`� �`•,y tity ♦,�vTy�� ♦� ♦S ♦ ♦ ♦ot'fv ®ei
�V� +r �,.
1 ♦C 9Q �PtF tl4 .; f. ♦,rj�j e►�r 1► ° , ♦... 9 . ¢ ►i ► . �r�, s a p9� 1'@ 1
yl+.�r ♦er `�! ►atpsi;ii x4'r 'lA♦eFA "B << ♦F r *` • ve p`` ` .�� v,�ji ♦.y .
► ♦t►«►lO♦j#i ♦♦°ii+►vi`4. rrr' �► >� :♦ r �� . !t` ♦ °4x # • r ,r . t a \♦ �P� w♦ y �•+w r
i ♦o1 ♦1e4�1�o,.t+y ♦1rs,♦ i ♦ ♦Ort,�(.'� rea #2
�♦♦ ♦ ♦ ♦i.0i Yt*� -+ Yt .ri+r♦ '� i rove J 'ri f y , # v tr' °�� @•
?tiA ♦ ♦♦`+91+D,►+­,y?tr►S >�rf �!, v�63a ♦« ♦14I►O ♦ �♦�1 .► g a . •:. w + ► t - �.
OQO ♦O♦ i 7 rA .r A i ►Q �p ♦♦°♦ w♦a►.� .s z '' ?':`�11( F4 '►10r• i t�a�r L 1{ ► ► 7 it
Mt, ►A�< °i> ♦ ♦a� ♦,�1 >�• >Sc�r`f Q ♦.»,a'♦ �►e1s , s► r +Q a ♦ t. y
i�t►f ♦Of6�'y ♦f" a ♦�i1�♦ i♦< w a{ I�,i a A' ' i ♦ `< �► ! L ++
titi z z c fir. •♦b♦.: ♦, .♦M ♦ ♦o♦ °AN r.y''►e ,TN <k •t, r►! iC ♦b >♦ , ♦+C�,: `w
♦ ra g .,°..; . > +,a ?:s��i<r► ♦♦�i°oe*r ? ; �s ►sf • " >♦ s v��� ` �v'�ir% s °�° r► !s� Area #3
.'.mot F < r *:
sss',' r �►ti� �►�O P�64 Y�s�!►3`O, ♦ ♦v +t4yu y4 , ► Y, +, 0 �S°♦� t 4w,4.i i .'4<a� °'� *t►:
1 !�♦< ►ra M t r r*!!P♦ < t► ►.� 4, ♦ ♦ e B►{ ► ''�4d ' v :.ark ►yl! �, 'soi:
♦ sr.. „dQ ?1+►4�bru °y'r♦va s ♦Y�e►� . ►� ,ret►S @� ►� ♦E ys �i +♦brr +i . ♦ ♦ ♦1 ♦+►�� a ♦<e` ♦~ ► ° ♦� 'v r �YrMS
' A, 0� ,4i4�i4."O'Ff�'o ♦Tt�rd`►>�,.♦;� �'`r 1rA,�� � ► ,���� � � -.. s'�,x ��dt• �,1� � °� °�,' r�•t��► -" � °���`'r,i ° ♦�` ��a'�e`�� +EeP�T�si ♦t•1vv . ��1+ �,��
♦Q�° . « a ;� kE w i 7AOF� 13+f .;. •IIS °day ♦�.faivitf►e� ?� , ♦�J ►� > °Q 0Q'Q' ?,"J►� ►>di 9 '�1♦14y�! °� ♦ t.
��ed"(. - �`►� l.►�► w'� r� ♦s �� ,� .� VGA ♦�`b' ° +d t� wit` ♦ °� y ►♦r� ♦ ♦' a �0 .. + * >.�F f �A� ,,1 ♦ ♦1��lwR +.
i►°♦ ♦A i Vv° a. f . $+ ! : ►� ,► 4 �i> A it•.it i +l 0 ♦c ♦f►♦♦ rr . e:a►
,♦�A ♦ ♦ ♦iei ♦i♦0♦OQAr4y.,�r,►i s +�,. r,.� i,� . , ♦p ♦ ♦dt i , i :� ►. . tQ it ►�1 ♦t ��> t l i i; ►+,0� i�; ¢t:�f•�A(,> t s ,�4
A' °♦ ♦'►er • i3O °�! r3 .,4w.Ypt t ►�`. °� >� t!.♦t i ♦Q�'♦ ♦♦�<t r'.a4 ♦ ar
0�it3 ♦ °>i.'a9A0♦ 1�♦ ! C, i .A` •v`v ♦ y,♦ r`�t► a y �; fK n♦ r ♦a `0 ♦1 E �s.'a,r bra dl,� 7`
� 9E ♦p♦ <5� 4 ei�� ♦ � sr y.< *� �"W4 ►i,► � r� ..> +� F,� y1°♦ s� iiAQSt°,♦�. r �Og�,w �4v
.. t ♦♦♦ ♦ . i♦1 ! ► r ♦•'t7 . * 9` S♦°♦ ♦° ♦O♦♦ -..• R ►elL- . 3 S+J'.►,:-
♦♦iA ♦iti ♦+" ►°N1►°•>r'• ��° ♦ ♦i� > ®tF~ w 1`s�w�1 Q w')�� ��I `s ► ®Oe�� ♦••,►
wl► ". i ° ♦b ♦!►' 1 d4�rig, ►•'! ♦4 3 * � .♦.►(°� ;•` � ♦ std '. �idirt�p�►°P`� �,
+� ►e�. ►°OOO°�4 . ,* z a > °♦♦♦ t +♦ ;t Le en d
♦ f- �t ►t► < a♦� > g
01♦10 ♦�i�s <>isesoiy <t „♦ °,;., ��,r.�,� ��.oq, �!�♦
♦o°i♦♦o♦♦°s •i♦<♦� t�O� r �. o♦ • FEMA-Regulated Floodway
o♦A11 ♦OA ♦ ♦ ♦♦4O ®O � 1l°+!9 �a 's»' ► i, .*� . ►��tA�i ►a�P,�t ♦♦
s�►fli4l ° °�y °♦,�`'i�s ' t . }bu1 "'= y °�� i, :, . ►♦e, �> * S��i�' ♦,
�Y * #• ;r A t♦ 36� !. 4'r v ry ♦t Wit►♦+► ♦ K
FEMA Zone A
�Jti�1 s �. 1 >e►l�dA,° ;: ° ♦P°a!bt' ♦° °! s� a eta
54 �Y� ►p♦ ♦1 ♦f►i19(: >O:es ►1 n♦♦ ♦
�e +r' ( �4�°� ♦t►+►�'♦i♦°♦�i ♦.°t• ° � r . ~..` _ ot` ♦�♦ FEMA Zone AE
"e ♦Q �� °44`�`+►f A°a r4; ��AI ♦ ♦ ° ♦ ° ♦p�►Y�F 3 ♦t. t�,,r3 `'•4,!` ♦!
eet;,�'�" .a��y•� w� ♦(+s ®es�+ ! ♦OO � +t � „ ♦ (�`3 FEMA 0.2 /o Annual Chance Flood Hazard
�► •�> t � . v ♦t' ♦ � ,,
FEMA Zone X
♦O - 4�♦y�. � >:. + tee' S` �. ► ♦♦ +. . .
0 750 1, 500 s° ♦�� °♦ '`'_'
Feet ai '� �' � Project Areas
♦E '>Oe r1
• !'�d�►4,': >°♦4 ° ♦ °♦ �4�'a`� .ib” .!i` er � >'M � ♦ ` � • t� �O:EBO.a �dr� w a '� � %i. •! � � S�. ,B�Q��i °,' "ye rs,1�,F ♦� %, >r y ►.y ♦�
Figure 6: FEMA Flood Hazard Zone Map
CORPUD Water /Sewer Relocations
Garner, Wake County, NC
January 2015

STREAM AND WETLAND
DATA FORMS

North Carolina Division of Water Quality - Stream Identification Form, Version 4 11
Date 6/25/2014
Project/Site Dupree Street Sewer
Stream S4
Latitude 35 706357
Evaluator J Hartshorn
County Wake
Longitude -78617225
R Sullivan
0
1
Total Points 335
Stream Determination
Other
Stream is at least intermittent
Ephemeral Intermitte t Perennial
g Quad Name Garner
if >_ 19 or perennial if ? 30
3
1
A Geomorphology Subtotal= 15
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
Score
1a Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
3
3,
2 Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
2
3
1
3 In- channel structure ex riffle -pool, step -pool, ripple-
ool se uence
0
1
—
2
3
1
4 Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
2
3
3
5 Active /relic flood lain
0
1
2
3
3
6 Depositional bars or benches
0
1
2
3
2
7 Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
2
3
1
8 Headcuts
0
1
2
3
0
9 Grade control
0
0 5
1
1 5
0 5
10 Natural valley
0
0 5
1
1 5
0 5
11 Second or greater order channel
No = 0
Yes = 3
0
artificial ditches are not rated, see discussions in manual
B Hydrology Subtotal = 105
12 Presence of Baseflow
0
1
2
3
3
13 Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
1
2
3
1
14 Leaf litter
15
1
05
0
1 5
15 Sediment on plants or debris
0
05
1
1 5
1'
16 Organic debris lines or piles
0
05
1
1 5
1
17 Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
Yes = 3
3
C Biology Subtotal =
18 Fibrous roots In streambed
3
2
1
0
2
19 Rooted upland plants In streambed
3
2
1
0
3
20 Macrobenthos note diversity and abundance
0
1
2
3
0
21 Aquatic Mollusks
0
1
2
3
0
22 Fish
0
05
1
1 5
05
23 Crayfish
0
05
1
1 5
0
24 Amphibians
0
1 05
1
1 5
1
25 Algae
0
1 05
1
1 5
1 5
26 Wetland plants In streambed
FACW = 0 75, OBL = 1 5, Other
= 0
0
'perennial streams may also be identified using other methods See p 35 of manual
Notes
Stream S4 Is actively eroding and multiple bank failures were observed within the
evaluated reach Riprap is present in large quantities along channel bed and bank
and a concrete weir Is present, likely Installed to hold grade S4 Is linear and has
likely migrated on top of or towards the existing sewer line In multiple places

USAGE AID# DWQ # Site # (indicate on attached map)
M STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
AG, ,,
Provide the following information for the stream reach under assessment:
1. Applicant's name CORPUD 2. Evaluator's name
3. Date of evaluation 06/25/2014
5. Name of stream Dupree Street Sewer - S4
7. Approximate drainage area 50 acres
9. Length of reach evaluated 100'
11. Site coordinates (if known) prefer in decimal degrees
Latitude (ex 34 872312)
Hartshorn, R. Sullivan
4. Time of evaluation 3:30 pm
6. River basin Neuse
8. Stream order First Order
10. County Wake
12. Subdivision name (if any) n/a
35.706357 Longitude (ex -77 556611)
- 78.617225
Method location determined (circle) ✓'1PS ❑ropo SheeCbrtho (Aenal) Photo /GIS❑Dther GIS❑Other
13. Location of reach under evaluation (note nearby roads and landmarks and attach map identifying stream(s) location)
S4 is located between Dupree Street and Aversboro Road, and begins at a culvert outlet at US 70.
14. Proposed channel work (if any) n/a
15. Recent weather conditions Recent conditions have been dry with no rainfall in 72 hours prior
16. Site conditions at time of visit Hot and humid, mid -80s.
17. Identify any special waterway classifications known FISection 10 _DTidal Waters - ❑Essential Fisheries Habitat
aTrout Waters ,❑Outstanding Resource Waters �v L Nutrient Sensitive Waters Dwater Supply Watershed (I -IV)
18. Is there a pond or lake located upstream of the evaluation point? NO If yes, estimate the water surface area n/a
19. Does channel appear on USGS quad map? NO 20. Does channel appear on USDA Soil Survey? NO
21. Estimated watershed land use 80 % Residential _% Commercial % Industrial % Agricultural
10 % Forested % Cleared / Logged 10 Rio Other ( Roadway /Parking )
22. Bankfull width 11' 23 Bank height (from bed to top of bank) 7'
24. Channel slope down center of stream Flat (0 to 2 %) OGentle (2 to 4 %) -[:[Moderate (4 to 10 %) .❑,Steep ( >10 %)
25. Channel sinuosity Straight 00ccasional bends Frequent meander -❑,Very sinuous Braided channel
Instructions for completion of worksheet (located on page 2): Begin by determining the most appropriate ecoregion based on
location, terrain, vegetation, stream classification, etc Every characteristic must be scored using the same ecoregion Assign points
to each characteristic within the range shown for the ecoregion Page 3 provides a brief description of how to review the
characteristics identified in the worksheet Scores should reflect an overall assessment of the stream reach under evaluation If a
characteristic cannot be evaluated due to site or weather conditions, enter 0 in the scoring box and provide an explanation in the
comment section Where there are obvious changes in the character of a stream under review (e g, the stream flows from a pasture
into a forest), the stream may be divided into smaller reaches that display more continuity, and a separate form used to evaluate each
reach The total score assigned to a stream reach must range between 0 and 100, with a score of 100 representing a stream of the
highest quality
Total Score (from reverse). 49 Comments-
S4 is an actively eroding stream channel with multiple bank failures observed along the evaluated reach Riprap is present in
large quantities along the channel bed and bank and a concrete weir is present upstream of one of the sewer crossings, likely
installed to hold grade S4 is linear and has likely migrated on top of or closer towards the existing sewer line in multiple
places
Evaluator's Signature Ya/110-92 `yct4l''r &r° rb Date 06/25/2014
This channel evaluation form is intended to be used only as a guide to assist landowners and environmental professionals in
gathering the data required by the United States Army Corps of Engineers to make a preliminary assessment of stream
quality. The total score resulting from the completion of this form is subject to USACE approval and does not imply a
particular mitigation ratio or requirement. Form subject to change — version 06/03 To Comment, please call 919- 876 -8441 x 26

Dupree Street Sewer - S4
STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
* These characteristics are not assessed in coastal streams
ECOREG_ ION POINT-
RANGE
#
CHARACTERISTICS
SCORE
Coastal
Piedmont
Mountain
1
Presence4f flow % persistent pools in "stream
0 =° 5
_
r` ` 0 - 4
a
0 = 5 ' <
3
no flow or saturation = 0, strop flow = max oints
2
Evidence,of past human alteration
0=6
0-5
0=5
2
- -
extensive alteration = 0,yno alteration = maxr omts
3
- - -� ,- - - -
0'_6
0 = 6
`° 0-4
--
0 - 5
3
no buffer 0,_conti ous, wjde °buffer = max omts
4
-=
.Evidence of nutrient or ,,chemical discharges
0 -5
0 -4
0 -4
2
extensive discharges = 0, no discharges = max: omts _
a
5
Groundwater discharge -
-
0 =3
0 -4
0-4
3
no dischar e = 0,_s rm s, seeps, wetlands, etc = max, omts
_
E..i
Presence ofadjacent floodplain
6-
no flood lain = °0, extensive flood lain =max points)
0 -_4,
0-4
0 -2°
3
a
7
- - - -
Entrenchment /`floodplain access
-
0- 5
0- 4
0- 2
3
(deeply entrenched = 0, frequent flooding = max< omts
8
Tresence,of adjacent wetlands
f
'0_6
0 -,4 x
�`
0 =_2
1
no wetlands = O; large adjacent wetlands = max points)-
9
_ -~ - - -= Channel sinuosity
0 = 5
0-4 -
0,3
1
extensive channelization = 0, natural meander =,max points)
'
- - -- �< Sedim ientnput
_=r
10
extensive deposition-- 0, little or no sediment = max points)
0-5
0 - 4
0 --:4
1
11
Size & diversiy of channcl ei3sustrte
NA*
0-4
0 - 5
3
fine, homogenous = 0, lar e, diverse, sizes =,max - omts _z ._v
12
T -Evidence-of channel incision or widening
0=5
0-4
0-5
2
�+
(deeply mcised =,0, stable bed & banks = max poi ts
_
43
Presence of major banl °failures �-
- e_ -
0
0 -5
0 -5
1
severe.erosion =_0, no_erosion,_stable_banks� max omts
r5
14
Root depth and -density on banks
O-3
0 - 4
0=5
1
no visible roots_ =_0, dense roots throu hout = max omts
'
- impact by agriculture, livestock, or timber production
`
15
0 = 5
0-4
0 = 5
3
substantial impact =0 no evidence = max points _
Presence of i ifle- pool/ripple- poolcom plexes
16
0-3
0-5
0-6
2
-(no riffles /ri les or� ools = =0, well-developed =max omt`s_
17
'Habitat complexity
0 =6
0 -6
0 -6
3
little or no habitat = r0, -fre uent, varied habitats = max oints
_
PQ
1 s
Canopy coverage over streambed
3
x
no shadm °ve etahom= 0 �contmuous=cano � =max omts
h -
- _ -
���
=_ - - -
"Sub"strate embeddedne`ss �
ns
�
- - -
-
19
NA*
0 - 4
0 = 4
3
dee 1 }embedded = 0, loose structure = max
Presence CUstreamtinvertebrates (see page 4)
'0
20 `.
-
no,eytdence == 0, common, - numerous es =_max omts �,
0- -4
0 -5
=5
0
v►
21-
Presence of amphibians
0 =4
0 -4
0 -4
2
O
no evidence = 0, common, numerous es - max omts
O
22-
� Presence of fish
`0 -4
0 -4
0 =4
1
no evidence = 0, coniinon; numerous es = max, omts =
_
7-
23
- Evidence °of wildli fe use
_
0 -6
0 -5
0 =�5
3
no„evidence - 0, abundant evidence = maxs omts
Total Points Possible
100
100
100
TOTAL SCORE (also enter on first page)
49
* These characteristics are not assessed in coastal streams

North Carolina Division of Water Quality - Stream Identification Form, Version 4 11
Date 6/25/2014
Project /Site Dupree Street Sewer
Stream S5
Latitude 35 706144
Evaluator J Hartshorn
R Sullivan
County Wake
Longitude -78618182
Total Points 335
Stream Determination
Other
Stream is at least intermittent
Ephemeral Intermitte Perennial
e g Quad Name Garner
if ? 19 or perennial if 2: 30
0
1
A Geomorphology Subtotal= 15
Absent
Weak
'Moderate
° Strong
-Score
1a Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
3
13
2 Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
2
3
1'
3 In- channel structure ex riffle -pool, step -pool, ripple-
ool se uence
0
1
2
3
2
4 Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
2
3
3
5 Active /relic flood lain
0
1
2
3
2
6 Depositional bars or benches
0
1
2
3
1
7 Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
2
3
1
8 Headcuts
0
1
2
3
0
9 Grade control
0
0 5
1
1 5
1 5
10 Natural valley
0
0 5
1
1 5
0 5
11 Second or greater order channel
No = 0
Yes = 3
0
artificial ditches are not rated, see discussions in manual
B Hydrology Subtotal = 9
12 Presence of Baseflow
0
1
2
3
3
13 Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
1
2
3
0
14 Leaf litter
15
1
05
0
1,5-
15 Sediment on plants or debris
0
05
1
1 5
1
16 Organic debris lines or piles
0
05
1
1 5
05
17 Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
Yes = 3
3
C Biology Subtotal = 95
18 Fibrous roots In streambed
3
2
1
0
2
19 Rooted upland plants In streambed
3
2
1
0
3
20 Macrobenthos note diversity and abundance
0
1
2
3
1
21 Aquatic Mollusks
0
1
2
3
0
22 Fish
0
05
1
1 5
0
23 Crayfish
0
05
1
1 5
0
24 Amphibians
0
05
1
1 5
1
25 Algae
0
05
1
1 5
1
26 Wetland plants In streambed
FACW = 0 75, OBL = 1 5, Other = 0
15
'perennial streams may also be identified using other methods See p 35 of manual
Notes
Stream S5 flows along a maintained overhead powerllne and sewer easement
The channel has been stabilized with riprap and the sewer pipe Is visible In the
channel Banks are steep and falling

USACE AID# DWQ # Site # (indicate on attached map)
STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
Provide the following information for the stream reach under assessment:
1. Applicant's name CORPUD 2. Evaluator's name
3. Date of evaluation 06/25/2014
5. Name of stream Dupree Street Sewer - S5
7. Approximate drainage area 10 acres
9. Length of reach evaluated 100'
11. Site coordinates (if known) prefer in decimal degrees
Latitude (ex 34 872312)
35.706144
Hartshorn, R Sullivan
4. Time of evaluation 4:00 pm
6. River basin Neuse
8. Stream order First Order
10. County Wake
12. Subdivision name (if any) n/a
Longitude (ex —77 556611) - 78.618182
Method location determined (circle) ✓PS❑ropo Shee❑Jrtho (Aenal) Photo /GIS❑)ther GIS❑0ther
13. Location of reach under evaluation (note nearby roads and landmarks and attach map identifying stream(s) location)
S5 is located east of Aversboro Road, west of the commercial complex in an overhead utility easement.
14. Proposed channel work (if any) n/a
15. Recent weather conditions Recent conditions have been dry with no rainfall in 72 hours prior
16. Site conditions at time of visit Hot and humid, mid -80s.
17. Identify any special waterway classifications known ❑Section 10 ❑Tidal Waters ❑Essential Fisheries Habitat
❑ Trout Waters ❑Outstanding Resource Waters ❑✓ _ Nutrient Sensitive Waters ❑ Water Supply Watershed (I -IV)
18. Is there a pond or lake located upstream of the evaluation point? NO If yes, estimate the water surface area n/a
19. Does channel appear on USGS quad map? NO
21. Estimated watershed land use % Residential
30 % Forested
22 Bankfull width 8'
20. Does channel appear on USDA Soil Survey? NO
50 % Commercial _% Industrial _% Agricultural
% Cleared / Logged 20 % Other ( Roadway /Parking )
23 Bank height (from bed to top of bank) 41
24. Channel slope down center of stream ❑Flat (0 to 2 %) QGentle (2 to 4 %) . ❑Moderate (4 to 10 %) _❑Steep ( >10 %)
25. Channel sinuosity Straight ❑Occasional bends ✓❑Frequent meander _❑ Very sinuous ❑.Braided channel
Instructions for completion of worksheet (located on page 2): Begin by determining the most appropriate ecoregion based on
location, terrain, vegetation, stream classification, etc Every characteristic must be scored using the same ecoregion Assign points
to each characteristic within the range shown for the ecoregion Page 3 provides a brief description of how to review the
characteristics identified in the worksheet Scores should reflect an overall assessment of the stream reach under evaluation If a
characteristic cannot be evaluated due to site or weather conditions, enter 0 in the scoring box and provide an explanation in the
comment section Where there are obvious changes in the character of a stream under review (e g , the stream flows from a pasture
into a forest), the stream may be divided into smaller reaches that display more continuity, and a separate form used to evaluate each
reach The total score assigned to a stream reach must range between 0 and 100, with a score of 100 representing a stream of the
highest quality
Total Score (from reverse): 44 Comments:
S5 flows along a maintained overhead powerline and sewer easement The channel has been stabilized with riprap and the
sewer pipe is visible in the channel Banks are steep and failing
Evaluator's Signature Y0V)1G1"' Ha1rLkG11r_V1 Date 06/25/2014
This channel evaluation form is intended to be used only as a guide to assist landowners and environmental professionals in
gathering the data required by the United States Army Corps of Engineers to make a preliminary assessment of stream
quality. The total score resulting from the completion of this form is subject to USACE approval and does not imply a
particular mitigation ratio or requirement. Form subject to change — version 06/03 To Comment, please call 919- 876 -8441 x 26

Dupree Street Sewer - S5
STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
* These characteristics are not assessed in coastal streams
ECOREGION POINT_
RANGE _ _
#
CHARACTERISTICS
SCORE
Coastal
Piedmont
Mountain
1
Presence of,,flow / ,persistent pools in stream
�' `0-5 -
0-4
-0 - 5
3
no flow or saturation = 0, strong flow max omts _
2
Evidence of past human alteration
n =
0 -6
0 -5
`0 -5
1
extensive alteration — 0 ,no alteration= max 5pinfs
3
_ - Riparian z _
one
0-6
�0 - 4
0 - 5
2
no_ buffer = 0,-contiguous, wide buffer = max iomts _
_
Evidence of nutrient or chemical 'i eharges
'
�0
4
0-5
- 4
0�- 4
2
dischar es = 0, no dischar es = max Points)
.,-(extensive
� a Groundwatendischarge
0-3"?
s0 - 4 =
"`0 - 4 -
3
U
5
no disc har e = 0 m s r s,_see s, wetlands; etc = max
points)
-
- -_
Presence of adjacent floodplain
0 -4
0 -4
___
0 -2
2
om
no flood lain_= 0, extensive flood lain =max points) ,, _
a
=6
- -- - - -� - -
Entrenchment / floodplain access
0-5
0-4
_-
0-2
2
(deeply entrenched = 0, frequent flooding = max, points)
_
Presence of adjacent wetlands
8-
0 - 6
0 - 4
-0-2
1
no wetlands = 0, large adjacent wetlands = max omts
9
Channel sinuosity
m extensive
0 -5
0 - 4
0 - 3
1
channelhzation = 0, natural meander = max po mts
10
- Sediment input -
--
0 -5
- - —
0 -"4
-
0 -4
2
extensive deposition= 0, little or no sediment = inax
�
�11
_ _oints
Size &diversity of channel bed-substrate
NA*
0-4
0 = 5
3
fine, homo enous_= 0, large, diverse sizes = Max points)
12
Evidence of channef incision or-Widening
0 -5 -
0 -4
0 -5
1
dee 1 incised = 0, stable bed & banks = max points)- _
_
Presence of major bank failures
13
severe erosion= 0, no erosion, stable banks= max omts
0 - 5 _
-0-5
0 - 5
2
T
114
Root depth and density on banks
_
0 -3
0 -4
0 -5 -�
2
_
} no visible roots- =-O, dense roots _throughout = max points)_
15
`Impact by �agriculture,f livestock, or timber proauction
0-5
0 4
0-5
3
substantial im act_ =0, no evidence.max points)
-
Presence of riffle- podl/ripple- po- ll-complexes
°
16
(no riffles /ri� lesw pools = 0 well- devel`o ed =max omts
0-3,
-
0 - 5
0-6
3
1 -7
�� Habitat complexity �
_ _ _
0 -6`
_ _ _ _
=0 -6
_ __
0 -6
2
little or no habitat = 0,_fre went, varied habitats -,max points)
=
'Canopy coverage over streambed
�0
18
no shading ve etation = _contmuous_cano =max point s)
-0,
0 -5
-5
-5
2
- - -- - - - - --
Sub stiate embeddedness
--
-0
19
NA*
'0-4
0 - 4
3
(deeply embedded = 0 loose structure = max _
-a o
Presegce,of stream invertebrates (see page 4)
`
0-4 �'
0- 5
0-5
0
no =evidence = ,0,'c6mmori, numerous types ==max p omts
21
Presence of amphibians
0- 4
0-4
0-4
2
no evidence = 0, common, numerous types = max oints
_
_
�`
Presence of fish
O
22
0 -4-_
0 -4
0 -4
_
�_� no evidence =,0, common, numerous es = max omts
Evidence of wildlife use-
-2 3
no_evidence_= 0, aliundant evidence = max points)
0 -`6
A - 5
0 - 5 ° s
2
Total Points Possible
100
100
100
TOTAL SCORE (also enter on first page)
44
* These characteristics are not assessed in coastal streams

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
Project /Site Dupree Street Sewer Replacement City /County Garner /Wake Sampling Date 6/25/2014
Applicant/owner City of Raleigh Public Utilities Department State NC Sampling Point W1 -UP
Investigator(s) J Hartshorn, R Sullivan Section, Township, Range Swift Creek
Landform (hiilslope, terrace, etc ) Slight Slope Local relief (concave, convex, none) None Slope ( %) 1 -2%
Subregion (LRR or MLRA) LRR P Lat 35 706101 N Long 78 617663 W Datum NAD83
Soil Map Unit Name Wy - Worsham sandy loam NWI classification
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes FV71 No= (If no, explain in Remarks )
Are Vegetation F_:1 Sod - F-1 or Hydrology F::] significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present?
Yes a] No=
Are Vegetation Soil - or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks )
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes ✓ No e Is the Sampled Area n
Hydnc Sod Present? Yes No ✓ within a Wetland? Yes No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes H No ❑
Remarks
W1 -UP is located on a slight slope adjacent to a sewer easement, and is located approximately 15' outside
of the wetland /upland boundary. Recent conditions have been relatively dry, with no rainfall recorded 72
hours prior, but 0.99" recorded over the 5 days prior to observation.
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators
J Surface Water (Al)
High Water Table (A2)
Saturation (A3)
Water Marks (61)
Sediment Deposits (B2)
Drift Deposits (63)
Algal Mat or Crust (134)
Iron Deposits (135)
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
Water - Stained Leaves (B9)
Aquatic Fauna (B13)
Field Observations
True Aquatic Plants (614)
Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
BThin Muck Surface (C7)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
Surface Sod Cracks (66)
Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (68)
Drainage Patterns (1310)
Moss Trim Lines (1316)
Dry- Season Water Table (C2)
Crayfish Burrows (C8)
Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
Geomorphic Position (D2)
Shallow Aqutard (D3)
Microtopographic Relief (D4)
FAC- Neutral Test (D5)
Surface Water Present? Yes No ✓ Depth (inches)
_
Water Table Present? Yes No ✓ Depth (inches)
Saturation Present? Yes F� No ✓ Depth (inches) Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes F No
(includes caodlary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available
Remarks
No indicators of wetland hydrology were observed at W1 -UP.
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2 0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) — Use scientific names of plants
Tree Stratum (Plot size 30' )
1 Pinus taeda
2 Acer rubrum
3 Lrqurdambar styragflua
4
5
6
7
8
Absolute
Dominant Indicator
% Cover
Species?
Status
60%
Y
FAC
25%
Y
FAC
5%
N
FAC
25% =Total Cover
Herb Stratum (Plot size 30'
1 none
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
90%
= Total Cover
Sapling /Shrub Stratum (Plot size 30'
)
)
FACW species
1 Quercus nigra
5%
Y
FAC
2 Puaus taeda
5%
Y
FAC
3 Juniperus virguuana
5%
Y
FACU
4 Magnolia grandiflora
5%
Y
FACU
5 Liquidambar styrac{flua
5%
Y
FAC
6
6
7
8
9
10
25% =Total Cover
Herb Stratum (Plot size 30'
1 none
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
14% =Total Cover
Sampling Point W1 -UP
Dominance Test worksheet
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC 5 (A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata 9 (B)
Percent of Dominant Species 56%
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC (A/B)
rrevaience maex worksneet
0%
= Total Cover
Multiply by
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size 30'
)
FACW species
x 2 =
1 Hedera helix
5%
Y
FACU
2 Lomcera japonica
5%
Y
FAC
3 Parthenocissus quznquefoha
2%
N
FACU
4 Vitis rotundifolra
2%
N
FAC
5
6
14% =Total Cover
Sampling Point W1 -UP
Dominance Test worksheet
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC 5 (A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata 9 (B)
Percent of Dominant Species 56%
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC (A/B)
rrevaience maex worksneet
Total % Cover of
Multiply by
OBL species
x 1 =
FACW species
x 2 =
FAC species
x 3 =
FACU species
x 4 =
UPL species
x 5 =
Column Totals
(A) (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A =
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators
1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
X 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
_ 3 - Prevalence Index is <_3 0'
_ 4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
_ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata
Tree — Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in (7 6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height
Sapling /Shrub — Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in DBH and greater than or equal to 3 28 ft (1
m) tall
Herb — All herbaceous (non- woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3 28 ft tall
Woody vine — All woody vines greater than 3 28 ft in
heiaht
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes ✓ No
Remarks (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet )
Canopy cover Is well established, and no herbaceous species were observed
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2 0

SOIL
Description (Describe to the depth needed to
or confirm the absence of in
Sampling Point W"P
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type' Loc2 Texture Remarks
0 -24" 10YR 5/6 100% Loam
'Type
C= Concentration, D= Depletion,
Hydnc Soil Indicators
Histosol (Al)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
Black Histic (A3)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
Stratified Layers (A5)
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11:
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N,
❑
MLRA 147, 148)
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
®Sandy
Redox (S5)
Stripped Matrix (S6)
Restrictive Layer (if observed)
Type
Depth (inches)
Remarks
RM= Reduced Matrix, MS= Masked Sand Grains 2Location PL =Pore Lining, M =Matnx
Indicators for Problematic Hydnc Soi
Dark Surface (S7)
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
Depleted Matrix (F3)
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
Redox Depressions (F8)
Iron - Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 136)
®Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
❑ Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147)
❑ 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
❑ Coast Praine Redox (A16)
(MLRA 147, 148)
❑ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
(MLRA 136, 147)
❑ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
❑ Other (Explain in Remarks)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
wetland hydrology must be present,
unless disturbed or problematic
Hydnc Soil Present? Yes ❑ No
The soil profile at W1 -UP was uniform through the upper 24 ". No Indicators of hydric soil were
observed, and neither saturation or water table was observed within the upper 24 ".
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2 0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
Project/Site Dupree Street Sewer Replacement City /County Garner /Wake Sampling Date 6/25/2014
Applicant/Owner City of Raleigh Public Utilities Department State NC Sampling Point W1 -WET
Investigator(s) J Hartshorn, R Sullivan Section, Township, Range Switch Creek
Landform (hlllslope, terrace, etc ) Flat Local relief (concave, convex, none) None Slope ( %) <I %
Subregion (LRR or MLRA) LRR P Lat 35 706056 N Long 78 617608 W
Soil Map Unit Name Wy - Worsham sandy loam NWI classification
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes F—v/—1 No❑ (If no, explain in Remarks )
Are Vegetation ❑Soil or Hydrology ❑ significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present?
-[::]
Datum NAD83
Yes EZZ J No ❑
Are Vegetation ❑ Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks )
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, Important features, etc
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes ✓ No ❑
Is the Sampled Area -/
Hydric Soil Presents Yes — ✓ No within a Wetland? Yes ♦ No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes _ ✓ No ❑
Remarks
W1 -WET Is a small wetland pocket at the base of a hlllslope adjacent to a maintained utility easement
Recent conditions have been relatively dry, with no rainfall recorded 72 hours prior, but 0 99" recorded
over the 5 days prior to observation.
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators
Secondary
Indicators (minimum of two required)
Surface Soil Cracks (136)
Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required, check all that apply)
❑
Surface Water (Al) True Aquatic Plants (614)
High Water Table (A2) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
Drainage Patterns (1310)
Saturation (A3) Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
Moss Trim Lines (B16)
Water Marks (B1) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
Dry- Season Water Table (C2)
Sediment Deposits (62) Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
Drift Deposits (133) Thin Muck Surface (C7)
HOther
Crayfish Burrows (C8)
Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
✓
❑
❑
Algal Mat or Crust (134) (Explain in Remarks)
Iron Deposits (135)
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
Water - Stained Leaves (139)
❑✓
Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
Geomorphic Position (D2)
Shallow Aqutard (D3)
Microtopographic Relief (D4)
Aquatic Fauna (B13)
FAC- Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations
Surface Water Present? Yes o ✓ Depth (inches)
RN.
Water Table Present? Yes ✓ Depth (inches)
Saturation Present? Yes n No ✓ Depth (inches)
�
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes � No ❑
includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available
Remarks
Wetland W1 Is a small wetland pocket located at the foot of a hlllslope and adjacent to a
maintained utility easement. The primary hydrologic input is stormwater runoff from a large
commercial complex and parking lot located upslope from W1. Stormwater flows off the impervious
area, through stream S3, and is then impounded by the utility easement. Clear evidence of overland
flow out of W1 Indicates only small amounts of water can be held In W1, and it Is likely that W1 Is
only periodically Inundated. The water table was not observed within the upper 24 ", and the soil
was not saturated.
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2 0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) — Use scientific names of plants
Tree Stratum (Plot size 30' )
1 Pmus taeda
2 Liquidambarstyraciflua
3 Acer rubrurn
4
5
6
7
8
Sapling /Shrub Stratum (Plot size 30' )
1 Acer rubrum
2 Ligush-urn sinense
3 Ulmus amerrcana
4 Liqurdambar styraciflua
5
6
7
8
9
10
Herb Stratum (Plot size 30' )
1 Microstegtum vzmemum
2 Lrquidambar styrac flua
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
Absolute
Dominant Indicator
% Cover
Species?
Status
50%
Y
FAC
15%
N
FAC
15%
N
FAC
80% = Total Cover
10%
Y
FAC
5%
Y
FACU
5%
Y
FACW
5%
Y
FAC
Sampling Point W1 -WET
Dominance Test worksheet
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC 8 (A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata 10 (B)
Percent of Dominant Species 80%
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC (A/B)
Prevalence Index worksheet
Total % Cover of Multiply by
OBL species x 1 =
FACW species x 2 =
FAC species x 3 =
FACU species x 4 =
UPL species x 5 =
Column Totals (A) (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A =
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators
1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
X 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
_ 3 - Prevalence Index is s3 0'
4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
25% =Total Cover
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
15% Y FAC Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
5% Y FAC
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata
Tree — Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in (7 6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height
Sapling /Shrub — Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in DBH and greater than or equal to 3 28 ft (1
m) tall
Herb — AII herbaceous (non- woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3 28 ft tall
20% =Total Cover
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size 30' )
1 Canipsis radicans 5% Y FAC
2 Lonicera japonica 5% Y FAC
3 Parthenoczssus quinquefolia 5% Y FACU
4
5
6
15% =Total Cover
Woody vine — All woody vines greater than 3 28 ft in
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes ✓ No El
Remarks (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet )
The canopy cover over wetland W1 was well established, and mlcrosteglum was present along the wetland edges The
vine layer was well established but was heaviest around the easement edge where periodic clearing occurs.
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2 0

SOIL Sampling Point W1 -WET
Profile Description (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators )
Depth
Matrix
Redox Features
(inches)
Color (moist)
%
Color (moist) % Type' Loc2
Texture Remarks
0 -5"
10YR 5/2
100%
Sandy Clay
5 -18"
10YR 5/1
g0%
7 5YR 5/6 10% C M
Clay
18 -24"
10YR 5/1
70%
7 5YR 5/6 30% C M
Clay
'Type C= Concentration, D= Depletion,
Hydnc Soil Indicators
Histosol (Al)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
Black Histic (A3)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
Stratified Layers (A5)
LJ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11;
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N,
MLRA 147, 148)
❑ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
®Sandy Redox (S5)
Stripped Matrix (S6)
Restrictive Layer (if observed)
Type
Depth (inches)
RM= Reduced Matrix, MS =Ma
2Location PL =Pore Lining, M =Matnx
Indicators for Problematic Hydnc Soi
❑ 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
❑ Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
(MLRA 147, 148)
❑ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
(MLRA 136, 147)
❑ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
❑ Other (Explain in Remarks)
Dark Surface (S7)
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
✓ Depleted Matrix (F3)
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
Redox Depressions (F8)
Iron - Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 136)
®Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
❑ Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
wetland hydrology must be present,
unless disturbed or problematic
Hydnc Sod Presents Yes n No ❑
Soils at W1 -WET were primarily clay soils, but the upper 5" did have a sandy texture, likely due to
the stormwater runoff from the upstream parking lot and commercial area. Redox concentrations
Increased with depth. It is likely that the redox concentrations are a result of periodic inundation
due to surface water runoff and not likely due to the presence of groundwater Given the proximity
to the stream, this area would likely be naturally drained, however the easement has created an
impoundment for the surface water runoff. Soils were not saturated within the upper 24 ", and the
water table was not observed In the upper 24 ".
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2 0

NCDWR BUFFER
DETERMINATION
LETTER

A®
NEN
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Pat McCrory
Governor
September 19, 2014
Kimley Horn and Associates
Jason Hartshorn
3001 Weston Parkway
Cary, NC 27513
John E Skvarla, III
Secretary
Subject: Surface Water Determination
NBRRO# 14 -291
Wake County
Determination Type
Buffer Call
Isolated or EIP Call
® Neuse (15A NCAC 28 0233)
Start@
❑ Tar - Pamlico (15A NCAC 2B 0259)
❑ Ephemeral /Intermittent/Perennial Determination
USGS
❑ Isolated Wetland Determination
❑ Jordan (15A NCAC 2B 0267)
To
Project Name Dupree Street Sewer Relocation
Location/Directions Property is located at the end of Dupree Street in Gamer, NC
Subject Stream Reedy Branch
Determination Date: September 19, 2014 Staff: James Graham
Feature/Flag
Not
Subject
E/1/P*
Start@
Stop@
Soil
USGS
Subject
To
Survey
Topo
To
Buffers
Buffers
A
X
P
X
X
B
X
P
X
*E /I /P - EphemeraUIntermittent/Perenmal
Explanation The feature(s) listed above has or have been located on the Soil Survey of Wake County, North
Carolina or the most recent copy of the USGS Topographic map at a 1 24,000 scale Each feature that is checked
"Not Subject" has been determined not to be a stream or is not present on the property Features that are checked
"Subject" have been located on the property and possess characteristics that qualify it to be a stream There may be
other streams located on your property that do not show up on the maps referenced above but, still may be
considered jurisdictional according to the US Army Corps of Engineers and/or to the Division of Water Resources
D WR
None
Carohna
North Carolina Division of Water Resources 1628 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC 27699 -1628 Phone [phone]
Internet www ncwaterguality org Location 3800 Barrett Drive Raleigh, NC 27609 Fax [phone]
An Equal Opportunity /Affirmative Action Employer— 50% Recycled/10% Post Consumer Paper

Dupree Street
Wake County
September 19, 2014
Page 2 of 2
This on -site determination shall expire five (5) years from the date of this letter. Landowners or affected parties that
dispute a determination made by the DWR or Delegated Local Authority may request a determination by the
Director. An appeal request must be made within sixty (60) days of date of this letter or from the date the affected
party (including downstream and /or adjacent owners) is notified of this letter. A request for a determination by the
Director shall be referred to the Director in writing c/o Karen Higgins, DWR WeBSCaPe Unit, 1650 Mail Service
Center, Raleigh, NC 27699.
This determination is final and binding unless, as detailed above, you ask for a hearing or appeal within sixty (60)
days.
The owner /future owners should notify the Division of Water Resources (including any other Local, State, and
Federal Agencies) of this decision concerning any future correspondences regarding the subject property (stated
above). This project may require a Section 404/401 Permit for the proposed activity. Any inquiries should be
directed to the Division of Water Resources (Central Office) at (919) -807 -6300, and the US Army Corp of Engineers
(Raleigh Regulatory Field Office) at (919) -554 -4884.
If you have questions regarding this determination, please feel free to contact James Graham at (919) 791 -4256
Respectfully,
Danny Sm. h, Supervisor
Water Qd/ality Section
Raleigh Regional Office
cc RRO /SWP File Copy

T
r
3,
ill/
VAL
ormn

USACE PRE-
JURISDICTIONAL
DETERMINATION
CORRESPONDENCE

Sullivan, Ross
From: Shaeffer, David L SAW < David L Shaeffer @usace army miI>
Sent: Wednesday, August 13, 2014 8 05 AM
To: Hartshorn, Jason
Subject: SAW- 2014 -01472 City of Raleigh, Dupree Street Sewer Replacement - RE Dupree
Street Sewer Replacement - Preliminary JD Request (UNCLASSIFIED)
Classification UNCLASSIFIED
Caveats NONE
Hi Jason,
Let's go ahead and do a desktop JD on this one as well I have assigned this project the file number SAW- 2014 -01472
Please reference this number in all correspondence regarding this project
When do you expect to submit an application?
Sincerely,
David L Shaeffer, Geographer
U S Army Corps of Engineers
Raleigh Regulatory Field Office
3331 Heritage Trade Drive, Suite 105
Wake Forest, North Carolina 27587
Phone 919 - 554 -4884 ext 31 Fax 919 - 562 -0421
The Wilmington District is committed to providing the highest level of support to the public To help us ensure we
continue to do so, please complete the Customer Satisfaction Survey located at http / /regulatory usacesurvey com/
- - - -- Original Message---- -
From iason hartshorn kimlev -horn com [mailto iason hartshorn kimlev -horn com]
Sent Monday, August 04, 2014 6 08 PM
To Shaeffer, David L SAW
Subject [EXTERNAL] Dupree Street Sewer Replacement - Preliminary JD Request
Good afternoon David,
On behalf of our client, the City of Raleigh Public Utilities Department ( CORPUD), Kimley -Horn is submitting the attached
Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination request for the above referenced project, located south of US 70 between
Aversboro Road and Butler Drive in Garner, Wake County, NC Kimley -Horn delineated Jurisdictional features within the
study area on June 25, 2014 Two Jurisdictional perennial streams (streams S4 and S5) were found to flow through the
project area, and one Jurisdictional wetland (W1) is present The project will ultimately seek to relocate an existing
sewer line within an existing maintained CORPUD easement, and easement documentation has been attached The
primary stream in the project corridor (S4) has migrated on top of the sewer line and the pipe currently lies beneath the
stream channel or just under the bank along much of its length Due to the location, CORPUD is seeing significant water
intrusion into the sewer line from S4 The project will relocate the sewer line out of the stream and create two new

perpendicular crossings of S4 in stable locations to facilitate the move The project will also seek to restore grade and
stabilize the banks in specific reaches along S4 where the stream is severely compromised
Kimley -Horn would like to request a field review for the above referenced project at your earliest convenience Please
review the attached preliminary JD request package and respond with available dates for a review of the delineation If
you would like any clarification on any of the above items, or if you need any additional information to assist in your
review of the preliminary JD request, feel free to contact me at 919 - 678 -4155 or reply to this email
Sincerely,
http //www kimley -horn com/ communication /signature /KimleyHorn LG LOGO RGB PRIMARY 96dpi ipg
<http / /www kimley -horn com />
Jason Hartshorn
Kimley -Horn 13001 Weston Parkway, Cary, NC 27513
Direct 919 678 4155 1 Mobile [phone]
Classification UNCLASSIFIED
Caveats NONE