20141167 Ver 1_401 Application_20141114

® Stantec Transmittal
Stantec Consulting Services Inc. O ' 8 7
801 Jones Franklin Road Suite 300
Raleigh NC 27606 -3934
Tel [phone] PAM
Fax [phone]
To Karen Higgins From Melissa Ruiz
Company NCDWR 401 & Buffer Permitting Unit ❑ For Your Information
Address: 512 N Salisbury St.
For Your Approval
Archdale Building - 9th Floor ❑ For Your Review
Raleigh NC 27604 ❑ As Requested
Phone [phone]
Date: October 28, 2014
Delivery Hand Delivery
Reference: Walgreens - Leesville & Strickland - NWP 39
Attachment
Copies
Doc Date
Pages
Description
5
10/27/2014
122
PCN, maps, plans
1
Check for $240 fee
STANTEC CONSULTING SERVICES INC.
Amber Coleman, LSS, PWS
Senior Environmental Scientist
Phone [phone]
Fax [phone]
amber coleman @stantec com
Design with community in mind
ac v \ 1713 \active\ 2023310002 \project\ documents \permits \final \transmittal_dwr docx
Q ,i
{{ NOV 0 7 2014
DEKIR 3 V4 i c_i< <;LSC �r:CES
401 & BUFFER, PERMITTINr

Stantec
October 27, 2014
File- 2023310002
Stantec Consulting Services Inc.
801 Jones Franklin Road Suite 300, Raleigh NC 27606 -3934
Attention: Karen Higgins
NCDWR 401 & Buffer Permitting Unit
512 N. Salisbury St.
Archdale Building - 9th Floor
Raleigh, NC 27604
Dear Ms. Higgins,
Reference: Walgreens - Leesville & Strickland
D
tW7 l
i NOV ® 7 2014 t
L - SOURCES
DENR - Uv�Mri orQKAITTiNG_
Please find the attached Pre - construction Notification (PCN) and supporting
documentation to apply for a Nationwide Permit (NWP) No. 39 for a commercial property
at the Intersection of Strickland Road and Leesville Road In Raleigh, NC.
The only jurisdictional feature on site Includes an unimportant non -RPW which begins on
the eastern side of the property and flows southwest Into a culvert under Leesville Road
(SAW-2011-02039). This stream is an unnamed tributary to Sycamore Creek which is part of
the Neuse River Basin. A buffer determination from NCDWR determined that the stream
origin with regard to the buffer rules is located on the west side of Leesville Road
(NBRRO #07 -210). Therefore the stream onsite is not subject to the Neuse Riparian Buffer
Rules.
The purpose of the proposed project is to build a Walgreens pharmacy and future
commercial building Including associated parking and access. The City of Raleigh Is
requiring driveway access to Old Leesville Road which requires an Impact to the non -
RPW. The future commercial building Is not included in this permit application but will be
built on the northeast portion of the parcel where no jurisdictional waters exist, therefore
no additional 401/404 permit will be required.
Stormwater approvals are being handled by the City of Raleigh. A copy of the
stormwater plan is attached to this application. Approvals from the City of Raleigh will be
forwarded upon receipt.
Design with community in mind

October 27, 2014
Page 2 of 2
Reference: Walgreens - Leesville & Strickland
The PCN packet contains the PCN form, USGS tbpoquad map, soils mapping, permit
drawing, site plan, stormwater plan, agent authorization, USACE JD approval, and
NCDWR Buffer Determination. Please contact me if you have any questions.
Regards,
STANTEC CONSULTVNIG SERVICES INC.
Amber L. Coleman, LSS, PWS
Senior Environmental Scientist
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
amber.coleman @stantec.com
Attachment: NW 39 PCN
Agent Authorization
USGS topo and NRCS Soils Maps
Permit Drawing
Approved JD
Buffer Determination
Stormwater Plan
Design with community in mind

o�ot w A rF9oG
� y
o -c
Office Use Only
Corps action ID no
DWQ project no
Form Version 1 4 January 2009
Page 1 of 10
PCN Form – Version 14 January 2009
Pre - Construction Notification (PCN) Form
A.
Applicant Information
1.
Processing
la
Type(s) of approval sought from the Corps
❑X Section 404 Permit ❑ Section 10 Permit
1 b Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number 39 or General Permit (GP) number
1 c
Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps?
❑X Yes ❑ No
1 d
Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply)
❑X 401 Water Quality Certification – Regular ❑ Non -404 Jurisdictional General Permit
❑ 401 Water Quality Certification – Express ❑ Riparian Buffer Authorization
le
Is this notification solely for the record
because written approval is not required?
For the record only for DWQ
401 Certification
__ ❑_Y_es _❑X _No
For the record only for Corps Permit
— ❑_Y_es ❑X _No_ _—
1f
Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for
mitigation of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank
or in -lieu fee program
❑ Yes ❑X No
1 g
Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties If yes, answer 1 h
below
❑ Yes ❑X No
1 h
Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)?
❑ Yes ❑X No
2.
Project Information
2a
Name of project
Walgreens - Leesville & Strickland
2b
County
Wake
2c
Nearest municipality / town
Raleigh
2d
Subdivision name
n/a
2e
NCDOT only, T I P or state project no
n/a
3.
Owner Information
3a
Name(s) on Recorded Deed
Saintsing Properties, LLC
3b
Deed Book and Page No
Book 015554 Page 00943
3c
Responsible Party (for LLC if
applicable)
Tom Erwin
3d
Street address
9701 Leesville Road
3e
City, state, zip
Raleigh, NC 27613
3f
Telephone no
919 - 610 -5263
3g
Fax no
n/a
3h
Email address
tserwin @yahoo com
Page 1 of 10
PCN Form – Version 14 January 2009

4.
Applicant Information (if different from owner)
4a
Applicant is
❑ Agent ® Other, specify
4b
Name
Gordon H. Kolb, Jr
4c
Business name
(if applicable)
G.H K. Developments, Inc.
4d
Street address
3920 Magazine Street
4e
City, state, zip
New Orleans, LA 70115
4f
Telephone no
(504)866 -7300
4g
Fax no
(504)566 -7301
4h
Email address
gordo @ghkinc com
5.
Agent/Consultant Information (if applicable)
5a
Name
Amber Coleman, LSS, PWS
5b
Business name
(if applicable)
Stantec Consulting Services, Inc
5c
Street address
801 Jones Franklin Road, Suite 300
5d
City, state, zip
- Raleigh, NC 27606
5e
Telephone no
919- 865 -7399
5f
Fax no
919- 851 -7024
-5g
-Email address - -- - - - --
-amber coleman @stantec com ___—
Page 2 of 10

B. Project Information and Prior Project History
1. Property Identification
1a Property identification no (tax PIN or parcel ID)
0788056251000
lb Site coordinates (in decimal degrees)
I Latitude 35 907171 Longitude -78 727428
1c Property size
391 acres
2. Surface Waters
2a Name of nearest body of water to proposed project
Ut to Sycamore Creek
2b Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water
B NSW
2c River basin
Neuse
3. Project Description
3a Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this
application
The surrounding area is currently a mixture of residential and commercial development The project parcel is currently undeveloped and is
approximately 75% wooded and 25% cleared /grass There is an existing stormwater detention basin on -site with a gravel access drive that serves the
adjacent property north of Strickland Road A small non -RPW begins along the southern property boundary and flows southeast
3b List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property 0
3c List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property 115
3d Explain the purpose of the proposed project
The - purpose -of the project is to build -a- Walgreens pharmacy-and-future-commercial building-including associated parking and access The City of
Raleigh is requiring driveway access to Old Leesville Road which requires impacting a non -RPW (intermittent) stream
3e Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used
The buildings, parking and road access will be constructed using typical construction means, methods and equipment (backhoes, trackhoes, pavers)
To build the access road from Old Leesville Road grading will be required that will fill the non -RPW stream onsite Appropriate erosion control devices
will be implemented during construction
4. Jurisdictional Determinations
4a Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the
❑X Yes ❑ No ❑ Unknown
Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property /
Comments
project (including all prior phases) in the past?
4b If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination, what type
❑ Preliminary ❑X Final
of determination was made?
4c If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas?
Agency /Consultant Company S &EC
Name (if known) Bob zarzecki
Other
4d If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation
SAW- 2001 -02039 - November 11, 2011 - documentation attached
5. Project History
5a Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for
❑Yes ❑X No ❑ Unknown
this project (including all prior phases) in the past?
5b If yes, explain in detail according to "help file" instructions
n/a
6. Future Project Plans
6a Is this a phased project?
© Yes ❑ No
6b If yes, explain
This phase of the project includes a Walgreens pharmacy and associated access roads and parking A commercial building will be built on the
northeast corner of the site at a later date No jurisdictional waters are present in the future phase area of the project
Page 3 of 10
PCN Form — Version 14 January 2009

C. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
la Which sections were completed below for your project (check all that apply)
❑ Wetlands ❑X Streams — tributaries ❑ Buffers ❑ Open Waters ❑ Pond Construction
2. Wetland Impacts
If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area Impacted
2a
Wetland Impact
number
Permanent (P) or
Temporary T
2b
Type of Impact
2c
Type of wetland
2d
Forested
2e
Type of jurisdiction
Corps (404,10) or
DWQ (401, other)
2f
Area of
Impact
(acres)
W1 -
Choose one
Choose one
Yes /No
-
0
W2 -
Choose one
Choose one
Yes /No
-
W3 -
Choose one
Choose one
Yes /No
-
W4 -
Choose one
Choose one
Yes /No
-
W5 -
Choose one
Choose one
Yes /No
W6 -
Choose one
Choose one
Yes /No
2g Total Wetland Impacts:
0
2h Comments
n/a
3. Stream Impacts
If there are perennial or Intermittent stream Impacts (Including temporary Impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this
question for all stream sites Impacted
3a
Stream Impact
number
Permanent (P) or
Temporary (T)
3b
Type of Impact
3c
Stream name
3d
Perennial (PER) or
Intermittent (INT)?
3e
Type of
jurisdiction
3f
Average
stream
width
(feet)
3g
Impact
length
(linear
feet)
S1 P
Fill
UT to Sycamore Creek
INT
Corps
5
115
S2
Choose one
-
S3
Choose one
-
-
S4
Choose one
-
S5
Choose one
-
-
S6
Choose one
-
-
3h Total stream and tributary impacts
115
31 Comments
Stream was determined to be Non -RPW during the jurisdictional delineation Stream will be filled by grading from the access road Stormwater will be
directed toward the outfall to the west of the impact area
Page 4 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1 4 January 2009

4. Open Water Impacts
If there are proposed Impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of
the U S then indivii ually list all open water impacts below
4a
Open water
Impact number
Permanent (P) or
Temporary T
4b
Name of waterbody
(If applicable)
4c
Type of Impact
4d
Waterbody
type
4e
Area of Impact (acres)
01
n/a
Choose one
Choose
0
O2
Choose one
Choose
03 -
Choose one
Choose
04 -
Choose one
Choose
4f Total open water impacts
0
4g Comments nia
S. Pond or Lake Construction
If pond or lake construction proposed, then complete the chart below
5a
Pond ID number
5b
Proposed use or
purpose of pond
5c
Wetland Impacts (acres)
5d
Stream Impacts (feet)
5e
Upland
(acres)
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
P1
Choose one
P2
Choose one
5f Total:
5g Comments n/a
5h Is a dam high hazard permit required?
❑ Yes ❑ No If yes, permit ID no
51 Expected pond surface area (acres)
5j Size of pond watershed (acres)
5k Method of construction
n/a
6. Buffer Impacts (for DWQ)
If project will Impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below If yes, then individually list all buffer impacts
below If any impacts require mitigation, then vou MUST fill out Section D of this form
6a. Project Is In which protected basin?
❑X Neuse ❑ Tar - Pamlico ❑ Catawba ❑ Randleman ❑ Other
6b
Buffer Impact
number—
Permanent (P) or
Temporary T
6c
Reason for impact
6d
Stream name
6e
Buffer
mitigation
required?
6f
Zone 1
impact
(square
feet )
6g
Zone 2
Impact
(square
feet
61 -
n/a
n/a
Yes /No
0
0
B2 -
Yes /No
B3 -
Yes /No
B4 -
Yes /No
B5 -
Yes /No
B6 -
Yes /No
6h Total Buffer Impacts:
0
0
61 Comments Stream was determined by NCDWR to not be subject to Neuse Riparian Buffer Rules (documentation attached - NBRRO #07 -210)
Page 5 of 10

D. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
la Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project
Due to the small size of the property and the requirement for driveway access to Old Leesville Road, avoiding the non -RPW stream was not feasible
Stormwater runoff from the area that entered the stream prior to construction as well as stormwater generated from the proposed project will now be
treated before entering the downstream off -site portions of the stream
lb Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques
Typical sediment and erosion control measures shall be installed to protect surface waters including, but not limited to silt fence placement, temporary
diversion ditches, stone check dams, inlet protection, temporary skimmer basins, temporary slope drains, and slope stabilization (seeding /mulch)
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for
impacts to Waters of the U S or Waters of the State?
❑ Yes ❑X No
2b If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply)
❑ DWQ ❑ Corps
2c If yes, which mitigation option will be used for this
project?
❑ Mitigation bank
❑ Payment to in -lieu fee program
❑ Permittee Responsible Mitigation
3. Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank
3a Name of Mitigation Bank n/a
3b Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter)
Type Choose one
Type Choose one
Type Choose one
Quantity
Quantity
Quantity
n/a
3c Comments
4. Complete if Making a Payment to In -lieu Fee Program
4a Approval letter from in -lieu fee program is attached
❑ Yes
4b Stream mitigation requested
linear feet
4c If using stream mitigation, stream temperature
4d Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only)
square feet
4e Riparian wetland mitigation requested
acres
4f Non - riparian wetland mitigation requested
acres
4g Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested
acres
4h Comments n/a
5. Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
5a If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan
n/a
Page 6 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1 4 January 2009

6. Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) —required by DWQ
6a Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires
Yes ❑X No
buffer mitigation?
6b If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation Calculate the
amount of mitigation required
6c
6d
6e
Zone
Reason for impact
Total impact
Multiplier
Required mitigation
(square feet)
(square feet)
Zone 1
n/a
3 (2 for Catawba)
Zone 2
1 5
6f Total buffer mitigation required:
o
6g If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e g , payment to private mitigation bank,
permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in -lieu fee fund)
n/a
n/a
6h Comments
Page 7 of 10'

E. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ)
1. Diffuse Flow Plan
1 a Does the project include or is It adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified
❑ Yes ❑X No
within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
1 b If yes, then is a diffuse flow plan included? If no, explain why
n/a
❑ Yes ❑ No
2. Stormwater Management Plan
2a What Is the overall percent Imperviousness of this project?
41%
2b Does this project require a Stormwater Management Plan?
❑X Yes ❑ No
2c If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why
n/a
2d If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan, then provide a brief, narrative description of the plan
A copy of the Stormwater Plan is attached The Plan is currently being reviewed by the City of Raleigh A copy of the approval will be forwarded to
NCDWR upon receipt
The site will be constructed with curb and gutter to direct stormwater runoff to a proposed underground detention facility Roof runoff will be collected
in underground roof drains and connected to the storm drainage system The underground detention is designed to provide water quantity control by
reducing peak runoff during the 2 -yr and 10 -yr 24hr storm events Water quality treatment on the site for N reduction is not required as the TN loading
on the site falls below the 10 Ibs /ac /yr limit Overflow from the detention facility will be discharged to the existing Swale south of the site
2e Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan?
City of Raleigh
3. Certified Local Government Stormwater Review
3a In which local government's jurisdiction is this project?
Raleigh
❑ Phase II
NSW
3b Which of the following locally - Implemented stormwater management programs
❑ USMP
apply (check all that apply)
❑ Water Supply Watershed
❑ Other
3c Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
❑Yes ❑X No
attached? A copy of the Stormwater Plan is attached It is currently under review by the City
4. DWQ Stormwater Program Review
❑Coastal counties
❑HQW
4a Which of the following state - Implemented stormwater management programs apply
❑ORW
(check all that apply)
❑Session Law 2006 -246
❑Other
4b Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
❑ Yes ❑ No
attached?
5. DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review
5a Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements?
❑ Yes ❑ No
5b Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met?
❑ Yes ❑ No
Page 8 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1 4 January 2009

F.
Supplementary Information
1.
Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement)
1 a
Does the project Involve an expenditure of public (federal /state /local) funds or the
❑ Yes ❑X No
use of public (federal /state) land?
1 b
If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an
❑Yes ❑
environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State
No
(North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
1 c
If you answered "yes" to the above, has the document review been finalized by the
State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval
Yes ❑ No
letter )
Comments n/a
2.
Violations (DWQ Requirement)
2a
Is the site In violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H 0500), Isolated
Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H 1300), DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards,
❑Yes X❑ No
or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B 0200)?
2b
Is this an after - the -fact permit application?
❑Yes ❑X No
2c
If you answered "yes" to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s)
n/a
3.
Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement)
3a
WIII this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result In
❑Yes ❑X No
additional development, which could Impact nearby downstream water quality?
3b
If you answered "yes" to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis In accordance with the
most recent DWQ policy If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description
The
project is a pharmacy and will not result in additional development
4.
Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement)
4a Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non - discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from
the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility
Wastewater generated from the project will be collected and transported via sanitary sewer to the local City of Raleigh Sewer Treatment Plant
Page 9 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1 4 January 2009

S. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or
❑ Yes © No
habitat?
5b Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act
❑ Yes ❑X No
impacts?
5c If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted
5d What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical
Habitat? NC Natural Heritage Program Element Occurrences GIS data (nheo shp) Only one occurrence shows up within a half mile of the
project site and it is a very low accuracy record for the Regal Darner (Coryphaeschna mgens) The Regal Darner is not listed as a federally
protected species and according to the NHP, "all we know about it is that it was observed somewhere in Wake County sometime before 2004 "
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat?
❑ Yes ❑X No
6b What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat?
1998 Final Habitat Plan for the South Atlantic Region Essential Fish Habitat Requirements for Fishery
South Atlantic Fishery Management Council Habitat and Ecosystem Atlas (http //ocean flondamanne org /safmc_ atlas /)
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal
governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation
❑X Yes ❑ No
status (e g , National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in
North Carolina history and archaeology)?
7b What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?
North Carolina Department of Cultural Resources — SHPO website was searched and one historic resource is located on the southern adjacent parcel
The Leesville School Teacherage is not listed on the National Register but is listed as eligible This project will have no effect on the budding
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement) -T
8a Will this project occur in a FEMA - designated 100 -year floodplain?
❑ Yes ❑X No
8b If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements
n/a
8c What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination?
FEMA Map Service Center https / /msc fema gov /webapp /wcs/ stores / servlet /mapstore /homepage /MapSearch html
�O129 %/Y
Applicant/Agent's Signature
Applicant/Agent's Printed Name
Date
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization
letter from the applicant is provided )
Page 10 of 10

AGENT/ AUTHORIZATION FORM
PROPERTY LEGAL DESCRIPTION
PARCEL ID 0788056251
SITE ADDRESS- 9701 LEESVILLE ROAD, RALEIGH, NC
PROPERTY OWNER- SAINTSING PROPERTIES
The undersigned, registered property owners of the above noted property, do hereby authorize
Gordon H Kolb, or Gordon H Kolb, Jr of GHK Developments Inc
(Contractor / Agent) (Name of consulting firm)
to act on my behalf and take all actions necessary for the processing, issuance and acceptance of this
permit or certification and any and all standard and special conditions attached
Pro erty Owner's Address (if diffeWt than property aboyejr� �G� r �'l NO 2 7(-1-)
Telephone.
We hereby certify the above information submitted in this application is true and accurate to the best of
our knowledge
Authorized Signature Date

Legend
V Streets
Project Site
USGS 1:24,000 Topographic Quadrangle - Bayleaf
Ne"s
i. Cour6nate System: NAD 1903Stoleftn North Corofn aF FS 3200Feel
2. Bose features: Rdeig"oke County GIS
3. Base Imagery: USGS
0 1.000 2000
Feet
124.000 (at orlgkW l do—t sae at 651111
® Stantec
Rojeal location 2023310002
Leesville & Slkkiwd Roads Prepared by ALC m 2014 -I D-22
Raleigh, NC
Ci- 1 /HOjeal
WALGREENS
401/404 Pre - Construction Notification
Figure No.
1
mle
VICINITY MAP
USGS 24K Topoquad - Bayleaf

N.M.
1. Coordnale System: NAD 1983 State Plane NC Feet
2. Base teoluref: RoWgh /Woke County GIS
3. Bme knoge,, USDA NRCS
Legend
Project Site
Streets
USDA -NRCS 1970 Wake County Soil Survey
AgB - Appling gravelly sandy loam, 2 -6% slopes
AgB2 - Appling gravely sandy loam, 2 -6% slopes, eroded
AgC - Appling gravelly sandy loam, 6-10% slopes
Cn - Colfax sandy loam
250 500
® Feet
1:7, R Id original tlocumenl size of 85x111
® Stantec
Project Laaation 2023310002
Lee, W 6 Stickler Roots Prepared by ALC m 2014-10 27
Raleigh, NC
Ckenl /N.'_1
WALGREENS
401/404 Pre - Construction Notification
Fguro No.
2
.isle
SOIL SURVEY MAP
Wake County

PERMANENTLY PRESERVED
UNDISTURBED OPEN SPACE. TYPICAL
OF ALL LANDSCAPED AREAS ON SITE
h * it
PIN: 0788050482
DB: 007450, PG: 00603
ZONING: R -4
LAND USE: CHURCH
EXISTING ASPHALT PAVEMENT
BY OTHERS; PROPOSED GRADES
SHOWN IN ROADWAY ARE
ASSUMED AND ARE BY OTHERS
pP =4 PIN: 0788056587 N
Q O DB: 010648, PG: 02330
ZONING: SC
4v 0 LAND USE: SHOPPING CENTER
sy G Q?
\ s y
h =
s INSTALL NCDOT CONCRETE CATCH BASIN. TIE EXISTING
PIPE INTO PROPOSED STRUCTURE 15 MAINTAINING
SS\ XISTING PIPE INVERT ELEVATION.
C;C
TIE TO ELEVATION OF O � \ ss
EXISTING ASPHALT PAVEMENT h,Q 11 8 Gil \ SS
/ ^ ss � s
PROPOSED NCDOT VALLEY GUTTER
EXISTING ASPHALT �T-
PAVEMENT BY OTHERS
CONVERT EXISTING CATCH BASIN
TO NCDOT JUNCTION BOX. RIM
ELEVATION SHALL BE FLUSH WITH
PROPOSED ASPHALT PAVEMENT
ELEVATION. SEE DETAIL ON SHEET
C- 7 r /141 TO ELEVATION OF -
;�
EXISTING ASPHALT /N /C4 VALLEY PGLITTERT
INSTALWON/C/OdARE CATCH BASIN. TIE
EXISTING PIPE INTO PROPOSED STRUCTURE
MAINTAINING EXISTING PIPE INVERT
ELEVATIONS. SEE DETAIL ON SHEET C -582.
DA PATH; CROSS
SLOPE SHALL
NOT EW�wDA'2% SUBDIVISION
•/FFE= "5008.000 �Y
EXISTING PRIVATE PERMANENT
DRAINAGE EASEMENT TO REMAIN FOR
MAINTENANCE TO EXISTING BASIN ONLY -\
10" HOPE ROOF DRAIN ® 1% MIN.
SLOPE TO STRUCTURE 10 �
6" HOPE ROOF DRAIN-/
® 1% MIN. SLOPE TO
STRUCTURE 10
ADJUST RIM OF EX. MANHOLE TO BE
FLUSH WITH PROP. FINISHED GRADE
SEGMENTAL BLOCK RETAINING WALL, -
TO BE DESIGNED BY OTHERS
ss
ss \-
U
ADJUST RIM OF EXISTING
MANHOLE TO BE FLUSH WITH
PROPOSED FINISHED GRADE
DRAINAGE SCHEDULE
EXISTING PRIVATE
PERMANENT DRAINAGE
DATA
EASEMENT
UNDERGROUND DETENTION SYSTEM
(13,136 VOLUME)
FES, TYP. Intermittent
(non -RPW) Stream
EXISTING
MBINED FLOW SPLITTER /OUTLET STRUCTURE
(SEALED WATERTIGHT PIPE CONNECTIONS).
SEE DETAIL ON SHEET C -584.
RETENTION
LENGTH
BASIN
ss
ss \-
U
ADJUST RIM OF EXISTING
MANHOLE TO BE FLUSH WITH
PROPOSED FINISHED GRADE
DRAINAGE SCHEDULE
STRUCTURE
DATA
DOWNSTREAM PIPE DATA
UNDERGROUND DETENTION SYSTEM
(13,136 VOLUME)
FES, TYP. Intermittent
(non -RPW) Stream
RIM
MBINED FLOW SPLITTER /OUTLET STRUCTURE
(SEALED WATERTIGHT PIPE CONNECTIONS).
SEE DETAIL ON SHEET C -584.
SIZE
LENGTH
UPSTREAM
DOWNSTREAM
NO.
ELEVATION
TYPE
IN.
FT.
INVERT
INVERT
DESCRIPTION
1
504.65
CI
15
4
498.65
498.60
2
502.50
CI
15
47
499.20
498.75
3
503.60
CI
15
81
500.35
499.30
4
505.60
CI
15
6
498.28
498.23
SEE
5
508.00
JB
15
99
499.01
498.48
DETAIL
6
506.40
CI
15
36
499.30
499.11
ON
7
507.00
JB
15
164
500.28
499.40
SHEETS
8
505.80
CI
15
53
500.76
500.48
C -571,
9
506.50
CI
15
58
501.28
500.96
C -581,
10
505.10
CI
15
86
501.90
501.38
&
11
506.00
CI
15
56
502.75
502.10
C -582
12
506.60
CI
15
14
499.55
498.60
13
505.50
JB
18
66
498.50
497.85•
14
506.20
JB
18
154
500.15
498.60
15
506.10
DI
18
67
503.50
502.95
16
511.60
CB
18
39
505.00
503.60
17
511.60
CB
18
78
507.00•
506.23
18
503.50
DI
24
134
493.35
492.00
19
506.10
UG DET.
24
62
493.14
492.00
20
507.45
JB
48
133
493.26
489.30•
21
511.50
JB
48
101
497.70•
493.46
K7SEE NOTE 8, TYP. OF ALL CROSSWALKS
(NOT SHOWN FOR CLARITY)
PIN: 0788150309
DB: 010648, PG: 02330
ZONING: SC
LAND USE: SHOPPING CENTER
I I.
N 5 4 l� PERMANENTLY PRESERVED
1 R UNDISTURBED OPEN SPACE. TYPICAL
OF ALL LANDSCAPED AREAS ON SITE.
SEE NOTE 10 p�2� ?-
I v O
I 4�0 -Z Qt'�v
G QQ
STRUCTURE 4 SHALL HAVE SEALED /WATERTIGHT
' PIPE CONNECTIONS, INSTALL TRASHGUARD
PLUS AT OUTLET PIPE LOCATION
TEMPORARY STRUCTURE; TO BE REMOVED AND PIPE
4 ABANDONED TO JUNCTION BOX UPON DEVELOPMENT OF LOT 3
i
i' FUTURE UNDERGROUND DETENTION
0 SYSTEM AND DISCHARGE PIPE FOR
i' LOT 3 STORMWATER MANAGEMENT
(WILL COLLECT ALL FUTURE
UILT -UPON AREAS FOR LOT 3) \
$Q
c
6 -50 2 oe
Ot J I
I
q�( ' ORMWATER MANAGEMENT
w ;
DEVICE: R -TANK MODULAR
-STORAGE
UNDERGROUND DETENTION SYSTEM
(13,136 VOLUME)
FES, TYP. Intermittent
(non -RPW) Stream
Perm�not Stream
Impact 1 - 115 If (fill)
MBINED FLOW SPLITTER /OUTLET STRUCTURE
(SEALED WATERTIGHT PIPE CONNECTIONS).
SEE DETAIL ON SHEET C -584.
EXTEND EXISTING 1
RCP APPROX. 3OLF
PIN: 0788045738
DB: 012987, PG: 01214
TREE CONSERVATION AREA ZONING: R -4
LAND USE: SINGLE
'Intermittent FAMILY HOME
(non -RPW) StreamNOTES:
1. EXISTING INFORMATION SHOWN PROVIDED BY JOHN Y.
'W 'RETAINING CONCRETE PHELPS JR.. PROFESSIONAL SURVEYOR. SURVEY DATED
APPROVED TCA t RETAINING WALL WITH HANDRAIL, AUGUST 19, 2013 (UPDATED AUGUST 29. 2013) AND
ALTERNATE COMPLIANCE TO BE DESIGNED BY OTHERS, CITY OF RALEIGH GIS DATA.
SEE NOTE 9. 2. CONTRACTOR SHALL HAVE ALL ON -SITE UTILITIES
LOCATED BY UTILITY LOCATING SERVICE PRIOR TO ANY
DEMOLITION OR CONSTRUCTION. NOTIFY OWNER /ENGINEER
OF ANY DISCREPANCIES.
3. ALL CONSTRUCTION TO BE PERFORMED IN ACCORDANCE
WITH CITY OF RALEIGH STANDARDS AND SPECIFICATIONS.
4. ALL AREAS SHALL HAVE POSITIVE DRAINAGE TO
STORMWATER COLLECTION SYSTEM. CONTRACTOR TO
ENSURE POSITIVE DRAINAGE FROM ALL PROPOSED
STRUCTURES.
5. ALL ROOF LEADERS TO TIE DIRECTLY INTO STORMWATER
COLLECTION SYSTEM.
6. NOT USED.
7. PROJECT IS NOT LOCATED IN THE 100 YEAR FLOODPLAIN
PER FEMA FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP 3720078800J
DATED MAY 2, 2006.
8. ALL CROSSWALKS SHALL BE ADA ACCESSIBLE, MAXIMUM
CROSS -SLOPE OF 2% ALLOWED.
9. CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE SHOP DRAWINGS OF CONCRETE
RETAINING WALL FOR APPROVAL BY WALGREENS AND
ENGINEER.
10. EXISTING 48" RCP AND ASSOCIATED 20' PRIVATE
DRAINAGE EASEMENT TO BE RELOCATED.
NOTE:
1. ALL STORM PIPES TO BE CLASS III RCP
UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE.
TYPE CODE:
DI= DROP INLET
CI= CURB INLET
CB- CATCH BASIN
OE= OPEN ENDED PIPE
JB= JUNCTION BOX
= EXISTING, CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY
ty SHEET LEGEND:
FFE= XXX.X FINISH FLOOR ELEVATION
EXISTING CONTOUR (TAKEN
FROM RALEIGH GIS DATA)
EXISTING CONTOUR
>� PROPOSED CONTOUR
EXISTING STORM DRAIN
- m m -STORM DRAIN
- 4 0 -ROOF DRAIN
® CURB INLET
NCDOT CATCH BASIN
0 DROP INLET
® JUNCTION BOX
h CURB & GUTTER
0 SPILL CURB & GUTTER
CURB & GUTTER
(BY OTHERS)
1�7'
FROM ROAD
TO PROPOSED R/W LINE
PIN: 0788143748
DB: 000554, PG: 00 -E-
ZONING: RB
FROAO CE LAND USE: VACANT
OF C RB RUNE
ISSUED FOR REVIEW
NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION
]0 Q 30 •0
mmkommosmomd
SCALE: 1' - 30'
zo
3
ME
og
i-
uw,
W o
4 w
rn
o:
0
N� N � m b
wZ -.
�Uf7mFN
�QW rnrn_V
6
oz
O
wx
m
0
o
�_ Z 5
10 W 2 z
p w W
w z _3 wI
w ¢��
Z g �W
c� rn w
Z J
a
0
C7
0
N
0
m
rn
o > w
i3 z is
SHEET 5 OF 7

U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
WILMINGTON DISTRICT
Action Id SAW- 2011 -02039 County Wake U S G S Quad NC- BAYLEAF
NOTIFICATION OF JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION
Property Owner: Mason Street LLC APent: Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
Junius Dillard Bob Zarzecki
Address: 9608 Old Leesville Rd Address: 11010 Raven Ridge Road
Raleigh, NC, 27613
Property description
Raleigh, NC, 27614
Size (acres) 3_.10 (Mason Street) and 3.91 (Dillard) Nearest Town Raleigh
Nearest Waterway UT to Sycamore Creek River Basin Neuse
USGS HUC 03020201 Coordinates Latitude: 35.906 Longitude: - 78.727
Location description 9605 Old Leesville Rd and 9701 Leesville Rd
Raleigh, NC 27613
Indicate Which of the Following Apply:
A. Preliminary Determination
_ Based on preliminary information, there may be wetlands on the above described property We strongly suggest you have
this property inspected to determine the extent of Department of the Army (DA) jurisdiction To be considered final, a
jurisdictional determination must be verified by the Corps This preliminary determination is not an appealable action
under the Regulatory Program Administrative Appeal Process( Reference 33 CFR Part 331) If you wish, you may
request an approved JD (which maybe appealed), by contacting the Corps district for further instruction Also, you may
provide new information for further consideration by the Corps to reevaluate the JD
B. Approved Determination
There are Navigable Waters of the United States within the above described property subject to the permit requirements of
Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act and Section 404 of the Clean Water Act Unless there is a change in the law or
our published regulations, this determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this
notification
X There are waters of the U S on the above described property subject to the permit requirements of Section 404 of the
Clean Water Act (CWA)(33 USC § 1344) Unless there is a change in the law or our published regulations, this
determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this notification
We strongly suggest you have the wetlands on your property delineated Due to the size of your property and/or our
present workload, the Corps may not be able to accomplish this wetland delineation in a timely manner For a more timely
delineation, you may wish to obtain a consultant To be considered final, any delineation must be verified by the Corps
X The waters of the U S on your project area have been delineated and the delineation has been verified by the Corps
We strongly suggest you have this delineation surveyed Upon completion, this survey should be reviewed and verified by
the Corps Once verified, this survey will provide an accurate depiction of all areas subject to CWA jurisdiction on your
property which, provided there is no change in the law or our published regulations, may be relied upon for a period not to
exceed five years
The waters of the U S including wetlands have been delineated and surveyed and are accurately depicted on the plat
signed by the Corps Regulatory Official identified below on — Unless there is a change in the law or our published
regulations, this determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this notification
There are no waters of the U S , to include wetlands, present on the above described project area which are subject to the
pernut requirements of Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (33 USC 1344) Unless there is a change in the law or our
Page 1 of 2

published regulations, this determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this
notification
The property is located in one of the 20 Coastal Counties subject to regulation under the Coastal Area Management Act
(CAMA) You should contact the Division of Coastal Management in Morehead City, NC, at (252) 808 -2808 to
determine their requirements
Placement of dredged or fill material within waters of the US and/or wetlands without a Department of the Army permit may
constitute a violation of Section 301 of the Clean Water Act (33 USC § 1311) If you have any questions regarding this
determination and/or the Corps regulatory program, please contact James Shern at 919 -554 -4884 x31
/ James.F.Shern(a,usace.army.mil.
C. Basis For Determination
Presence of an Ordinary High Water Mark
D. Remarks
E. Attention USDA Program Participants
This delineation /determination has been conducted to identify the limits of Coips' Clean Water Act jurisdiction foi the
particular site identified in this request The del meation/determination may not be valid for the wetland conservation
provisions of the Food Security Act of 1985 If you or your tenant are USDA Program participants, or anticipate participation
in USDA programs, you should request a certified wetland determination from the local office of the Natural Resources
Conservation Service, prior to starting work
F. Appeals Information (This information applies only to approved jurisdictional determinations as indicated in
B. above)
This correspondence constitutes an approved jurisdictional determination for the above described site If you object to this
determination, you may request an administrative appeal under Corps regulations at 33 CFR Part 331 Enclosed you will find a
Notification of Appeal Process (NAP) fact sheet and request for appeal (RFA) form If you request to appeal this
determination you must submit a completed RFA form to the following address
US Army Corps of Engineers
South Atlantic Division
Attn Jason Steele, Review Officer
60 Forsyth Street SW, Room 1OM15
Atlanta, Georgia 30303 -8801
In order for an RFA to be accepted by the Corps, the Corps must determine that it is complete, that it meets the criteria for
appeal under 33 CFR part 331 5, and that it has been received by the Division Office within 60 days of the date of the NAP
Should you decide to submit an RFA form, it must be received at the above address by
* *It is not necessary to submit an RFA form to the Division Office if you do not object to the determination in this
correspondence **
Corps Regulatory Official
E- Signedb SHERN JAMES F 1286971730
I EPt
d
"'p-128,69r-71730
J�N
11 t' �
Date 11/21/11 Expiration Date 11/21/16

Applicant Junius Dillard File Number SAW- 2011 -02039 I Date 11/21/11
Attached is See Section below
❑ INITIAL PROFFERED PERMIT (Standard Permit or Letter of permission) A
❑ PROFFERED PERMIT (Standard Permit or Letter of permission) B
❑ PERMIT DENIAL C
X APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION D
1-1 PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION E
SECTION I - The following identifies your rights and options regarding an administrative appeal of the above decision
Additional information may be found at http //www usace army mil/inet/funchons /cw /cecwo /reg or
Corps regulations at 33 CFR Part 331.
A: INITIAL PROFFERED PERMIT: You may accept or object to the permit.
• ACCEPT If you received a Standard Permit, you may sign the permit document and return it to the district engineer for final
authorization If you received a Letter of Permission (LOP), you may accept the LOP and your work is authorized Your
signature on the Standard Permit or acceptance of the LOP means that you accept the permit in its entirety, and waive all
rights to appeal the permit, including its terms and conditions, and approved jurisdictional determinations associated with the
permit
• OBJECT If you object to the permit (Standard or LOP) because of certain terms and conditions therein, you may request
that the permit be modified accordingly You must complete Section II of this form and return the form to the district
engineer Your objections must be received by the district engineer within 60 days of the date of this notice, or you will
forfeit your right to appeal the permit in the future Upon receipt of your letter, the district engineer will evaluate your
objections and may (a) modify the permit to address all of your concerns, (b) modify the permit to address some of your
objections, or (c) not modify the permit having determined that the permit should be issued as previously written After
evaluating your objections, the district engineer will send you a proffered permit for your reconsideration, as indicated in
Section B below
B PROFFERED PERMIT You may accept or appeal the permit
• ACCEPT If you received a Standard Permit, you may sign the permit document and return it to the district engineer for final
authorization If you received a Letter of Permission (LOP), you may accept the LOP and your work is authorized Your
signature on the Standard Permit or acceptance of the LOP means that you accept the permit in its entirety, and waive all
rights to appeal the permit, including its terms and conditions, and approved jurisdictional determinations associated with the
pernnt
• APPEAL If you choose to decline the proffered permit (Standard or LOP) because of certain terms and conditions therein,
you may appeal the declined permit under the Corps of Engineers Administrative Appeal Process by completing Section II of
this form and sending the form to the division engineer This form must be received by the division engineer within 60 days
of the date of this notice
C PERMIT DENIAL You may appeal the denial of a permit under the Corps of Engineers Administrative Appeal Process by
completing Section II of this form and sending the form to the division engineer This form must be received by the division
engineer within 60 days of the date of this notice

D APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION You may accept or appeal the approved JD or provide new
information
• ACCEPT You do not need to notify the Corps to accept an approved JD Failure to notify the Corps within 60 days of the
date of this notice, means that you accept the approved JD in its entirety, and waive all rights to appeal the approved JD
• APPEAL If you disagree with the approved JD, you may appeal the approved JD under the Corps of Engineers
Administrative Appeal Process by completing Section II of this form and sending the form to the district engineer This form
must be received by the division engineer within 60 days of the date of this notice
E PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION You do not need to respond to the Corps regarding the
preliminary JD The Preliminary JD is not appealable If you wish, you may request an approved JD (which may be appealed),
by contacting the Corps district for further instruction Also you may provide new information for further consideration by the
Corps to reevaluate the JD
SECTION H - REQUEST FOR APPEAL or OBJECTIONS TO AN INITIAL PROFFERED PERMIT
REASONS FOR APPEAL OR OBJECTIONS (Describe your reasons for appealing the decision or your objections to an initial
proffered permit in clear concise statements You may attach additional information to this form to clarify where your reasons or
objections are addressed in the administrative record )
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION The appeal is limited to a review of the administrative record, the Corps memorandum for the
record of the appeal conference or meeting, and any supplemental information that the review officer has determined is needed to
clarify the administrative record Neither the appellant nor the Corps may add new information or analyses to the record
However, you may provide additional information to clarify the location of information that is already in the administrative
record
POINT OF CONTACT FOR QUESTIONS OR INFORMATION
If you have questions regarding this decision and/or the
If you only have questions regarding the appeal process you may
appeal process you may contact
also contact
District Engineer, Wilmington Regulatory Division,
Mr Jason Steele, Administrative Appeal Review Officer
Attn: James Shern
CESAD -PDO
U S Army Corps of Engineers, South Atlantic Division
60 Forsyth Street, Room l OM 15
Atlanta, Georgia 30303 -8801
Phone [phone]
RIGHT OF ENTRY Your signature below grants the right of entry to Corps of Engineers personnel, and any government
consultants, to conduct investigations of the protect site during the course of the appeal process You will be provided a 15 day
notice of any site investigation, and will have the opportunity to participate in all site investigations
Date
Telephone number
Signature of appellant or agent
For appeals on Initial Proffered Permits send this form to:
District Engineer, Wilmington Regulatory Division, Attn: James Shern, 69 Darlington Avenue, Wilmington,
North Carolina 28403
For Permit denials, Proffered Permits and approved Jurisdictional Determinations send this form to:
Division Engineer, Commander, U.S. Army Engineer Division, South Atlantic, Attn: Mr. Jason Steele,
Administrative Appeal Officer, CESAD -PDO, 60 Forsyth Street, Room 1OM15, Atlanta, Georgia 30303 -8801
Phone: [phone]

Dillard Stormwater
50 100 200 Feet
OF
U
WAKE
COUNTY
NOR111 CAR01INA

of IN
X02 QG
tom1
Alphm Real Estate
Attn: Jack Alphm
400 Oberlin Road, Suite 320
Raleigh, NC 27605
BASIN.
Michael F Easley, Governor
William G Ross Jr, Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
September 20, 2007
Neuse River X Tar- Pamhco
(15A NCAC 2B .0233) (15A NCAC 2B .0259)
Coleen Sullins, Director
Division of Water Quality
NBRRO #07 -210
Wake County
Complaint NOV Buffer Determination X
Incident # Appeal Call
Project Name. 9601/9605 Old Leesville Road
Location/Directions: located south of Strickland Road between Old Leesville Road and Leesville Road
Subject Stream UT to Sycamore Creek
Date of Determination: 9/19/07
Feature(s)
Not
Subject
Subject
Start @
Stop@
Stream
Form Pts.
Soil Survey
USGS
Topo
A
X
Flag A
X
Explanation: The feature(s) listed above has or have been located on the Soil Survey of Wake County, North
Carolina or the most recent copy of the USGS Topographic map at a 1.24,000 scale Each feature that is checked
"Not Subject" has been determined not to be a stream or is not present on the property and is not subject to the
buffer rules. Features that are checked "Subject" have been located on the property and possess characteristics that
qualify it to be a stream and are subject to the buffer rules. There may be other streams located on your property
that do not show up on the maps referenced above but, still maybe considered jurisdictional according to the US
Army Corps of Engineers and/or to the Division of Water Quality.
This on -site determination shall expire five (5) years from the date of this letter. Landowners or affected
parties that dispute a determination made by the DWQ or Delegated Local Authority that a surface water
exists and that it is subject to the buffer rule may request a determination by the Director. A request for a
determination by the Director shall be referred to the Director in writing c/o Cyndi Karoly, DWQ
Wetlands /401 Unit, 2321 Crabtree Blvd., Raleigh, NC 27604 -2260. Individuals that dispute a determination
by the DWQ or Delegated Local Authority that "exempts" a surface water from the buffer rule may ask for
an ad judicatory hearing. You must act within 60 days of the date that you receive this letter. Applicants are
hereby notified that the 60 -day statutory appeal time does not start until the affected party (including
downstream and adjacent landowners) is notified of this decision. DWQ recommends that the applicant
conduct this notification in order to be certain that third party appeals are made in a timely manner. To ask
North Carolina Division of Water Quality Raleigh Regional Office Surface Water Protection Phone [phone] Customer Service
Intemet h2o enr state nc us 1628 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC 27699 -1628 FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer— 50% Recycled/1 0% Post Consumer Paper
Nom` Caroltn.
Niura!!il

{
I
s`
a
1
l
9601/9605 Old Leesville Road
Wake County
9/20/07
Page 2 of 2
s for a hearing, send a written petition, which conforms to Chapter 150B of the North Carolina General
Statutes to the Office of Administrative Hearings, 6714 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, N.C. 27699 -6714. This
t determination is final and binding unless you ask for a hearing within 60 days.
fThe (owner /future owners) should notify the Division of Water Quality (including any other Local, State, and
Federal Agencies) of this decision concerning any future correspondences regarding the subject property
I (stated above). This project may require a Section 404/401 Permit for the proposed activity. Any inquiries
should be directed to the Division of Water Quality (Central Office) at (919)- 733 -1786, and the US Army
Corp of Engineers (Raleigh Regulatory Field Office) at (919) -876 -8441.
Respectfully,
o< / e /
Lauren C. Witherspoon
Environm6ital-Seiuor Specialist
CC. Wetlands/ Stormwater Branch, 2321 Crabtree Blvd, Suite 250, Raleigh, NC 27604
RRO /SWP File Copy
Central Files
Ben Brown, City of Raleigh, P.O. Box 590, Raleigh, NC 27602
North Carolina Division of Water Quality Raleigh Regional Office Surface Water Protection Phone [phone] Customer Service
Intemet h2o.enrstate.naus 1628 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC 27699 -1628 FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity /Affirmative Acton Employer — 50% Recycled/10% Post Consumer Paper
NorthCarolina
Natirra!!y

Ue- �Ui" GeC2, N �. Ld82 �v f j
'
E w�IBZ Gry' ti T /
IC2 c�0 cet� GeC AgB2 �2 C gC.
AOD
MgB P '102 GeB2 �•
:Ge132
gC A982 0 ° ' \ rCgF32 ? C n Ag$
cep=
WkE
r, CeD
Cg A
lip
a , - C�a3
j �V C.D r1C3 C °82�
GeB
A 01
fv1 Cr,�)/ -% .A ,y- QJJ / Ee ✓ _'w Coo✓ w.... ' .'�� '.+......i
'' ' / c r2 ,;;r :�-�.__j(� Ag82 AgrJ �(
a � �% AgC)) //j p �`'� t /
/ {Q, 1 Cgf3' ` �--^�� i �'�j •,� \;
AgB
gC
CgB
CeD
Ge62 r--r
AgC
�rD �' ABC'; '\ \N ARB2 ( �ic~� _ Agt3_
CgB — AgC" } (�
En62 `tic, C !U C9f32 ) 1 y e n r
2V \A gB Cm
;eC2 e 2.tri AgC t m
E
C
N �� It -mil" ....... F �1_�2
f / J
gB2
l4 Gei3L ,� A gB2 I�yo
/'4C2 G^ ` / fJ r ! \\ ✓ �O i�'t� IJ
����...CgC2 f ..,..._._. __ �._ ,.r •. t 1 'iSS t1 ,,7 cG \'�.�� � � �� .1 '`� _ / � J��.:. AP ApD
Me 7

WALGREENS -
Leesville Road and Strickland Road
Raleigh, North Carolina
Storm Drainage and
Stormwater Management Report
September 8, 2014
Project # 2023310002

WALGREENS .
Leesville Road and Strickland Road
Raleigh, North Carolina
Storm Drainage and
Stormwater Management Report
September 8, 2014
Project # 2023310002
Prepared for:
GHK Developments, Inc.
3920 Magazine Street
New Orleans, LA 70115
(504) 866 -7300
Prepared by:
Stantec
5565 Centerview Drive, Suite 107
Raleigh, NC 27606
(919) 851 -1919
Table of Contents

Table of Contents
1. Project Narrative
1 1 Site Description
12 Proposed Development
13 Storm Drainage
14 Stormwater Management
2. Storm Drainage Calculations
21 Drainage Areas
22 Hydraflow and C -Value Calculations of new Stormwater System
23 Outlet Protection Worksheet
3. Stormwater Management Routing Calculations
31 Underground Detention Sizing
32 2 and 10 Year Storm Pre Vs. Post Flow Calculations and UG Detention Routing
Calculations
33 Nitrogen Loading Calculations
4. Miscellaneous Maps /Reports
41 Sods Report'
42 FEMA Flood Insurance Rate Map

1. Proiect Narrative
1.1 Site Description:
The current site is a 3.91 acre undeveloped property located at the southeast corner of
Leesville Rd. and Strickland Rd. in Raleigh, North Carolina. The site currently is mostly
wooded with a grassed field adjacent to Strickland Rd. There is an existing stormwater
detention facility on the site that takes up the southwest corner of the parcel. This
detention facility is circular and has a gravel access drive to it from Strickland Rd. The
existing site runoff is overland sheet flow directed toward an existing drainage swale that
runs along the southern edge of the property. This swale conveys drainage to a large
culvert southwest of the property where the drainage is conveyed under Leesville Rd An
additional drainage swale exists on the west edge of the property and conveys drainage to
the south. The site is located in the Neuse River Basin and is subject to Nitrogen removal
requirements per City of Raleigh stormwater management regulations.
The site accepts minimal offsite drainage from Strickland Road and Old Leesville Road
to the North and East. Proposed swales and culverts are located on the site to bypass
flows from undeveloped areas and to maintain the existing drainage patterns.
The soil types for the site are AgB and AgC, which are defined as Appling gravelly sandy
loam, 2 to 6 percent slopes and Appling gravelly sandy loam, 6 to 10 percent slopes, as
shown on the Web Soil Survey published online by the USDA Natural Resources
Conservation Service. The site is located in Zone X (areas outside the 100 -year
floodplam) as mapped on FEMA Flood Insurance Rate Map 3720078800J dated May 2,
2006. A copy of the soils report and FIRM map are included with this narrative.
1.2 Proposed Development:
The proposed development is a 13,650 square foot Walgreens with associated parking
and drives. The addition of impervious areas for the proposed development will increase
the impervious percentage on -site to approximately 41%.
1.3 Storm Drainage:
The proposed parking areas and travelways will be constructed with concrete curb and
gutter and sloped pavement to direct stormwater runoff to proposed curb inlets. The curb
inlets will be connected by a series of underground reinforced concrete pipes (RCP) that
will convey the stormwater runoff to a proposed underground detention facility. Roof
runoff will be collected in underground roof drains and connected to the storm drainage
system. Drainage from grassed and landscaped areas will be bypassed around the
impervious /paved areas on the site to prevent excess sediment accumulation in the
underground detention facility.

1.4 Stormwater Management:
An underground detention facility is proposed as part of this development for stormwater
management. The underground detention facility is designed to provide water quantity
control by reducing the stormwater peak runoff in the 2 -year and 10 -year, 24 -hour storm
events from the pre - development level. A flow splitter structure with a low flow orifice
is used to reduce and control the peak outflow from both the 2 -year and 10 -year 24 -hour
storm events. Water quality treatment on the site for nitrogen reduction is not required as
the total nitrogen loading on the site falls below the 10 lbs. /ac. /yr. limit for non-
residential development. Overflow from the underground detention facility will be
discharged to the existing swale south of the site. This is the same connection point for
the pre - development runoff.
The underground detention facility was modeled using Hydraflow Hydrographs
Modeling Software. The underground detention facility consists of R- TankHD modular
storage units connected to a flow splitter /outlet structure. Details on the size and volume
of this underground detention facility can be found in section 3.1 of this report and in the
plan details.
The installation of the underground detention facility on the site allows for the peak flow
reduction requirements to be met. The attached stormwater management calculations
include the final pre vs post flows as well as the final nitrogen loading for the site.

/
r
t ` 3
- I I
II ��II_gll' Nag
1
-4961
Oft
Yet.
--94-
V
zoo
'% I r— '---- -GOSr - -�' / / � 1111
111 ,1 \ \\ El X1111
IWO
r
o r
r
�s
�.
MSS
- - -HONI 1
xL----------------=L---------------------i-
z�
X'OCf M ,SS.£OAOS `
- -_-505-
.
/
/ Off,
fliff
►09
f ,
-4961
Oft
Yet.
--94-
V
zoo
'% I r— '---- -GOSr - -�' / / � 1111
111 ,1 \ \\ El X1111
IWO
r
o r
r
�s
�.
MSS
- - -HONI 1
xL----------------=L---------------------i-
z�
X'OCf M ,SS.£OAOS `

" 1
------------------------------
"E"I'mom
,I 111* 3 ,LI.K.,'C N
�i
s�
r
Yh
I
I

1­7 �A
k
v
r`
8
o
M v0
--Ij
IP
Q6
1,
qv
r`
8
o
M v0
--Ij
ITN l
IP
V-1
ITN l

2. Storm Drainage Calculations
2.2 HydraJlow Calculations of new Stormwater System

C -Value Weighted Calculations (C =0.35 for pervious -open space and C =0.95 for impervious - paved)
Pipe 1
Pipe 2
Pipe 3
Pipe 4
Pipe 5
Pipe 6
Pipe 7
Pipe 8
Pipe 9
Pipe 10
Pipe 11
Pipe 12
Pipe 13
Pipe 14
Pipe 15
Pipe 16
Pipe 17
Pipe 18
% Imp.
% Perv.
0
30
25
10
#VALUE!
20
#VALUE!
15
15
45
0
0
100
70
75
90
80
85
85
55
100
100
#VALUEI
#VALUE!
80
0
40
75
C-

V.
IE
4
O
,Z
E
E
v7w,
-I
sm
3
co
E
,WN
CW
u
s
-
t
tt'
c
JR
U
g
U
U
U
C)
U
o'
U
oo
-C O
g
W
r
N
g
v
b
10
^
m
Of
g
W
g
W
-
r �i
}�
J
W
—W
�p
{:
^
•r
Ol1A ,
O
gr
r
�
m
�
f
{y
utpy -:g'
r
2
17
�IR'
I`�
m
_N
V,
�
IL1
r
W N rV
!1L
�0
N
C
Z
G_
G
y 0
_ --
a i,
---
l0
- _
pp��
OD
Q��Wpp�
-
W
Q
p�
-
EOD
-
r
gyp}
�y
pp
�y
M
p
(O
N
p
p
r
'N
CD
pp
N
�
1p�
w O
-
CO
i
'!p^7�
_t0
^
r
ow
i
O
N
E
Oi�
`�
r
!ri •®
�Y�Y'
�i'l
1IR
1W),
®
:°-
�0�
o
�
r
CC
3 H
o
0
0
0'
o
m
o
r
o,
m
O
ACS
_
a
m
N
N
O
!!
N
m
N
Ol
^
N
r
8
O
O
A
W
v
S
�S
v�'
v
uQi
5,
c
m
n
t�•
�i
°�
�
�
`Q�
�
�i
°,
°m
a�
�6°t•
co»
�
�
� �
g��i
m
a
�v
m
In
in
CO
W
Go
g
us
in
o
o
us
to
o
40
u�
o
m
in
ao
m
m
m
m
v
i
d
'
m
N
r
IA
M
l7
.-
O
O
LU
1
_
-
N
Pl
V)
17
Cq
N
_ _
J
-
--
t
a
J
I
f
C,a.
,•
C'QQ• i
'
N
Rl
<
m
m
^
m
O
O
r
r
r
N
r
l7
r
'1
r
la
r
(61
r
^
r
m
r
z'

m
co
it
O
c�
4w
3�
co
E
0
4w
co
0
cc
J
_
Cp pp pp pp p p po p
(p`1n (0•(00 O � ?O a0D „� � 8 m'Y09 N � aD (O�� `
�a
i'O
us
WEi (Si'17iSfO'1�i�'�EiR (FiIR Into
�
-
W)'iM0• In O i0p O V O "� (0n CD N (0 O — -
co
C
app Nr fpp 1pn i m app 1p� app Itpf tpp Yp� �p app •r +N
7
AO)—W WO- Nmm�M10r �W1�Q�
M O Of'— O! °� M (O N,O) N a0 N (O (O(O
,—
W
M A 01, ,A A 1n A A �,1n pp
Ngl7 tD�ep� �p�`ppO N SC-4;R 0) - N f07ry A +(O
1
C
�pO.1n
0) 0)'W)�0) 0)o O O, to) ��a OB0)
Vol pp�� ew, ��pp'N
.T.
C g
IA N•�-
It it)WP Q "� f 11pp�1tpp�Ippn
1v�lw 11V (p1�
tO CY 0 NF � ALL tW�ll')001Q
N
06
�V°1n CD'o5t8�v fv H
o
N }�ola17%- 8co(d000))�C4
E
�
�V� )'O1rV�'°n�v
z
aa1`ig,rnli3a,s(`8 om8lgr'io�'(�o °oo
OR
oo.- oo00;000 W'o —C3.
'�------ --- --- OHOmmN
O) A N M01 W IAA
Atn 1n M�W (OM/1�AAC0 m,1q VuG1
M
C
-
Q�
- - a
CA'Ai te�A A t A ;;,Cl in S
d
=
(O
b
I� 3 Y'l P- Of M CID
O C04 O•V a 0) OI O w N N•< ID A 4 V
O
HC
M(V'—w7mcr) NM MMM N`V
V
�
Of�OtN N M l7 �n (p A N NiN to (O'O) O NtN
f0 AAA 1fl��n �!J'b
,_
M 1c)a10 AIA 10 (O (O AiA.f�
_
C
E
N 00 O 1['1 f N
� vi � N O O O) A'N CO O,O
u
(D K00toWW
v
F'
5
e E
0000o00a00a0000000
01e'cuioLeiWWW*nooLninu,0
E
N18epp pp A ipp CS Axs3 Y4%
(�
F
0000_0000 O O 0000000 +0 _
-
x
gypp'
,M -- - _ — -
O� N S p OO82 O
W
w
aA0
C
_
C
O O O'O O O'O O +C 0 0 0 0 O.O O O C
d'
C
m
A
M) I+ pp O p ' m' p is .1, 02, M 0p ` V 09; -8
�
o00,00 ^0oo0000ooa0'0o
a
+
O
Y'f
W
Og00�00_00000'Od0000�
�
C
X0 AIR 0,7,0 NO'O SIR OOkn 8s N
0
C w
dd d 0,0 0 6 6 0,0 O,OFO O O,0 d 'O —
8 n Mg M'0 N IM W t�op Npp M cn:
C
c C �M�•f, M110 C
W�NtWV,(n(OA.Wa)'— WW. -���W
- -- -
W
J
--- - - ---
O- N M °V 10 (O A c0
r' N MV 1n (O A co 0)
m•
d
O
Z

E
u
Lf
C
o -
u
i
D
i
I'
D
n i
e
zI
°o
to
Ln
In
N
O
of
N
0
N
N
O
r
O L �
N
�j
I
S (l
'I
n
J
CD
LU
W
J
n �
V =
p$ $
O
O N
W
0
N

N
W
COD
W
x
N
m
a
CL
CO
N
N
C
3
CL
3
as
E
L
0
40
cn
D
D
pt
989 c9+9 els
0
IIII�I�I
VIIVI'r��
II
11
-
1
fill
11
09 909 13 WIN
196 009 13 AUI
1
11
IM111
III
III
•
09 909 .13 WIN
�
IIIIII
PHI
III�II
IIIIIIN�
UHHUH
�I
I
I
I
INl�li��l
�
iiiin
,l
iAINIIIIIIIIWgn
nn�
1 1
____-
- -
-
M909 13 WIN
111111
0
IRINlllllli�
09-909 13 1-�J18
D
D
pt
I
I
INl�li��l
�
iiiin
,l
iAINIIIIIIIIWgn
nn�
____-
- -
-
- --
111111
IRINlllllli�
I_
D
D
pt

)n
LL u
tin,
9L u,
lnl
9L U'
,ln(
4L ul
UI
ln0
I
£ L ul
UI
0
Ilogn0
rn
io
Ln
Ln
,
i
v
I
i
°o I
t�
Lo 1
m
O t
M U
N
N
o
Co
N
J
w
W
,
J
N
N
c
0
o
��
t
w
LOS 13 AUJ
h00
ll'OO SOS 13 Aul
109 COS 13 AUJ
NMI
!109 COS 13 AUJ
NufvR
19 LOOS 13 AUJ
Oz 909, qW18
°iie��i�p
m
m
mmm
09116'1 '3 AU,
jumil
I
III
INI_
i
is (jog 13 Lulu.
u�MHill
nm
ss�IGO
NN
io
Ln
Ln
,
i
v
I
i
°o I
t�
Lo 1
m
O t
M U
N
N
o
Co
N
J
w
W
,
J
A
o,
rn
N
N
c
0
o
��
t
w
A
o,
rn

C
In
0
0
0
0
0
0
x
co
F-
M
o
0
0
0
0
0
ON
C
U
d
a
(9
N
0
0
0
0
0
0
U M
Z
r
r
r
r
r
r
r
N
y
W
J
t t
J
�
y
y
W
N
c
Y
rn0)
0)
0)
°�D0°rn
co
r"
x
m 0
r
3
w _
(D
(D
(D
CD
�
N
CD
0 N N
N Q
�
m 3
m
U p
_o
m
LY
Q
n. <
¢Q¢¢mm<
° 3
C1
�V
0o
N
a O
-T m
0
( > c
co o L
vv�v0000v
m nE
v .m d o
l «
W
O
r
N
N
c
N
t
m
w
°
0
>
0
0
>
0
>
0
>
0
>
0
w
_
0
Z
*k
*k
a#kkk
L r
O
CD m
L0 p
0
x p
i
=
„'�
r
E a
W w
OL
cc
❑
O
E n m u
O
�k
O
E x�e�
IL a
C =�
o c
N M 4
W a o
D °
�
o
z
o
L08
Z
z

3. Storrnwater Managenient Routing Calculations
3.1 UndergroundDetendori Sizing

Step 1
Step 2
R- Tank "° Worksheet
Contact*, Prorock Project Name: Walgreens Leesville
Compan : Stantec Location: Ralei h, NC
Phoney 919 - 532 -2321
Fax,
Enter the required storage capacity in cubic fee 13,000
Volume of Tanks Requir
Using the buttons, select a depth from the table below. Rem'FMI5771hat the deeper the system, the more
economic it becomes. Of course you'll typically want the bottom of the system to be above the water table
or hard -pan, keeping in mind you need 12" of cover above the system (24" for parking lots or roads).
Depth Options and
Corresponding Number of Tanks Required
yle
Depth (in)
Number of Tanks Required
Square Footage Required
Tanks
9.44
5,655
17,394
e Tanks
17.32
3,083
9,483
le Tanks
f
33.85
1,577
4,851
e Tanks
50.39
1,060
3,260
Tanks
66.92
797
2,451
Tanks
83.46
640
1,969
d a Mini Unit
8.65
6,172
18,984
p
3
tep 4
Step 5
Gi�url;`ystem Dimensions. Enter the length available on the site to install the system (in feet).
The worksheet will then show you the width and length in terms of total number of tanks, the footprint
of your system, and the footprint of the excavation, allowing a 2' perimeter to compact backfill.
Length available: 40 Feet
Number of units long: 15 Footprint: 35.18 Feet Long
Number of units wide: 43 56.40 Feet Wide
Tanks used in Excavation Footprint: 39.18 Feet Long
selected system: 645 60.40 Feet Wide
Check the box below if the Tank is located below a parking lot or any area subject to traffic loads.
E] Yes, there will be traffic loads above the RainTank.
Check the box below if you would like to include a liner in your system to allow you to harvest/recycle
water in the system for use in irrigating the landscaping.
Q Yes, I'd like to include a liner in the system to recyde water.
Step 6 The next worksheet contains a list of all the materials you will need to build this system.
Please review this form. If you like, you can fill in unit costs for all items and determine an
estimate for the total system including installation.
ACF Environmental
• 1- 800 - 448 -3636
sales(a.acfenvironmental.com
v' www.acfenvironmental.com
Cuslamar FOCUSeU, Ern+ronmenpay Cammxfee

�r`' �raa •tea= as:`a� �
�• � 11111111 .��• ra��� ���'ara`a� �
//11,111 `1,11; a►. �_ • ,�a a� a: ,.�.��♦ 1
-
�
111 111 11 ,1111, , rir� •+" + i i rir rr � - _ _ � _� - _ _ - _ "
1111;111 �� r rrr' . i i_rr= r =rrr _
1 1► r �'� i r it rr
11 ,� r= r� r� � • r= rr rr ri • _
_ "
J
Q
H
2
� 0
i
2
W

Project Name: Walgreens Leesville
Project Location: Raleigh, NC
Bottom Elevation of R- Tank HD: 493.14 ft
Top Elevation of R- TankHD: 500.10 ft
System Capacity: 13,136 cf
493.14 ft
0 cf
493.24 ft
188 cf
493.34 ft
377 cf
493.44 ft
565 cf
493.54 ft
754 cf
493.64 ft
942 cf
493.74 ft
1,131 cf
493.84 ft
1,319 cf
493.94 ft
1,508 cf
494.04 ft
1,696 cf
494.14 ft
1,885 cf
494.24 ft
2,073 cf
494.34 ft
2,262 cf
494.44 ft
2,450 cf
494.54 ft
2,639 cf
494.64 ft
2,827 cf
494.74 ft
3,016 cf
494.84 ft
3,204 cf
494.94 ft
3,393 cf
495.04 ft
3,581 cf
495.14 ft
3,769 cf
495.24 ft
3,958 cf
495.34 ft
4,146 cf
495.44 ft
4,335 cf
495.54 ft
4,523 cf
495.64 ft
4,712 cf
495.74 ft
4,900 cf
495.84 ft
5,089 cf
495.94 ft
5,277 cf
496.04 ft
5,466 cf
496.14 ft
5,654 cf
496.24 ft
5,843 cf
496.34 ft
6,031 cf
496.44 ft
6,220 cf
496.54 ft
6,408 cf
496.64 ft
6,597 cf
496.74 ft
6,785 cf
Total Number of R- Tank HD Units: 645 units
Square Footage of System: 1,984 sf
Storage per 0.1 ft: 188.473 cf
ArzF
e
Customer focused, Environmentahy Committed
�1
1- 800 - 448 -3636
Storage
496.84 ft
6,974 cf
496.94 ft
7,162 cf
497.04 ft
7,350 cf
497.14 ft
7,539 cf
497.24 ft
7,727 cf
497.34 ft
7,916 cf
497.44 ft
8,104 cf
497.54 ft
8,293 cf
497.64 ft
8,481 cf
497.74 ft
8,670 cf
497.84 ft
8,858 cf
497.94 ft
9,047 cf
498.04 ft
9,235 cf
498.14 ft
9,424 cf
498.24 ft
9,612 cf
498.34 ft
9,801 cf
498.44 ft
9,989 cf
498.54 ft
10,178 cf
498.64 ft
10,366 cf
498.74 ft
10,555 cf
498.84 ft
10,743 cf
498.94 ft
10,931 cf
499.04 ft
11,120 cf
499.14 ft
11,308 cf
499.24 ft
11,497 cf
499.34 ft
11,685 cf
499.44 ft
11,874 cf
499.54 ft
12,062 cf
499.64 ft
12,251 cf
499.74 ft
12,439 cf
499.84 ft
12,628 cf
499.94 ft
12,816 cf
500.04 ft
13,005 cf
500.10 ft
13,136 cf
500.10 ft
13,136 cf
500.10 ft
13,136 cf
500.10 ft
13,136 cf
�1
1- 800 - 448 -3636

3. Stormwater Manaaement Routine Calculations
3.2 2 and,10 Year Stom Pre Vs. Post Flow'Calculations and UGDetention
Routing Calculations

Q2_& Q10 RESULTS (SCS Curve Number Method)
Project: Walgreens LeesAlwand Strickland
*Post Develooment�Flow Calculation:
= Total discharge from underground detention + total offsite discharge, not captured by underground detention
2,year post =1 78;cfs + 3.09 cis = 4 87 ois
10 year post = 2.32 cfs + 7 64 cis = 9.96 cfs
v
Pre-
Post-
i
Pre-
Post -
Developed
Developed
Developed
Developed
r BASIN
"
I 2 -year r
2 year
'
10 -year
10 -year
>NAME
discharge
discharge*
, % Increase
discharge
discharge*
% Increase
Outfall #1
5M
' _ 4.87
4.32%
'13 28,
9.96
- 25'00%
Outfall. #2
Outfall 0
adtfall-44
7-
*Post Develooment�Flow Calculation:
= Total discharge from underground detention + total offsite discharge, not captured by underground detention
2,year post =1 78;cfs + 3.09 cis = 4 87 ois
10 year post = 2.32 cfs + 7 64 cis = 9.96 cfs
v

Hydraflow Table of Contents Walgreens - Prelim Pre vs. Post -R -Tank Chambers- 13000CF.gpw
Hydraflow Hydrographs Extension for AutoCAD® Civil 3D® 2012 by Autodesk, Inc. v9
Wednesday, 05 / 14 / 2014
Watershed Model Schematic ................................................. ............................... 1
Hydrograph Return Period Recap ......................................... ............................... 2
2 - Year
SummaryReport .................................................................................... ............................... 3
HydrographReports .............................................................................. ............................... 4
Hydrograph No. 1, SCS Runoff, Existing ............................................. ............................... 4
Hydrograph No. 2, SCS Runoff, Prop. Offsite DA ............................... ............................... 5
Hydrograph No. 3, SCS Runoff, Prop. UG Detention DA .................... ............................... 6
Hydrograph No. 4, Reservoir, UG Detention Routing ......................... ............................... 7
Pond Report - UG Detention -R- Tank .............................................. ............................... 8
10 - Year
SummaryReport .................................................................................. ............................... 12
HydrographReports ............................................................................ ............................... 13
Hydrograph No. 1, SCS Runoff, Existing ........................................... ............................... 13
Hydrograph No. 2, SCS Runoff, Prop. Offsite DA ............................. ............................... 14
Hydrograph No. 3, SCS Runoff, Prop. UG Detention DA .................. ............................... 15
Hydrograph No. 4, Reservoir, UG Detention Routing ........................ ............................... 16
OFReport .............................................................................. ............................... 17

I-

Hydr ®graph. Return Perioe! F pA ydrographs Extension for AutoCAD @ Civil 3D®,2012byAutodesk, Inc v9
Hyd.
Hydrograph
Inflow
Peak Outflow (dfs)
Hy4rograph
No.
type
hyd(s)
Description
-
—
-
-
-
- -
(origin)
1,yr
2 -yr
3 -yr
5 -yr
10 -yr
25 -yr
50 -yr
100-yr
1
SCS Runoff
5'089
9-713
1328
1866
2304
2748
Existing
2
SCS Runoff
3 093
5 672
7 643
1059
1298
1542
Prop Offsde DA
3
SCS Runoff
9 370
1241
1452
1747
1975
2200
Prop UG Detention DA
4
Reservoir
3
--
1 77,7
- --
2 111
i
2 321
I
14 °97
2034
`29 46 I
MDetention Routing
Prof file.- Walgreem -Prelim Pre vs Post -R -Tank Chambers- 13000CF gpw
Wednesday, 05 / 144 2014

Hydrograph Summary Repo rjrirwflnwH.1r

Hydrograph Report
Hydraflow Hydrographs Extension for AutoCAD® Civil 3D® 2012 by Autodesk, Inc v9
Hyd. No. 1
Existing
Hydrograph type
= SCS Runoff
Peak discharge
Storm frequency
= 2 yrs
Time to peak
Time interval
= 1 min
Hyd. volume
Drainage area
= 3.910 ac
Curve number
Basin Slope
= 0.0%
Hydraulic length
Tc method
= User
Time of conc. (Tc)
Total precip.
= 3.60 in
Distribution
Storm duration
= 24 hrs
Shape factor
Composite (Area /CN) = + (1.900 x 69) + (2.010x60)] 13.910
Q (cfs)
6,00
5.00
4.00
3.00
N KI
1.00
Existing
Hyd. No. 1 -- 2 Year
4
Wednesday, 05 / 14 / 2014
= 5.089 cfs
= 11.97 hrs
= 11,069 cuft
= 64*
= Oft
= 5.00 min+
= Type II
= 484
0.00 1 1 1 1 1 1 . I I I I I F 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22
Hyd No. 1
oN JmAu- DA� .J- MIN, WIL'u,
24
Q (cfs)
6.00
5.00
4.00
3.00
1PA1111111"
1.00
1
26
Time (hrs)

Hydrograph Report 5
Hydraflow Hydrographs Extension for AutoCAD® Civil 3D® 2012 by Autodesk, Inc. v9
Wednesday, 05 / 14 12014
Hyd. No. 2
Prop. Offsite DA
Hydrograph type
= SCS Runoff
Peak discharge
= 3.093 cfs
Storm frequency
= 2 yrs
Time to peak
= 11.97 hrs
Time interval
= 2 min
Hyd. volume
= 6,438 cuft
Drainage area
= 2.350 ac
Curve number
= 65*
Basin Slope
= 0.0%
Hydraulic length
= 0 ft
Tc method
= User
Time of conc. (Tc)
= 5.00 min
Total precip.
= 3.60 in
Distribution
= Type II
Storm duration
= 24 hrs
Shape factor
= 484
Composite (Area /CN) = [(0.200 x 98) + (1.500 x 61) + (0.340 x 60) + (0.310 x 69)1/ 2.350
Q (cfs)
4.00
3.00
2.00
1.00
0.00 "
0
Prop. Offsite DA
Hyd. No. 2 -- 2 Year
2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16
Hyd No, 2
Q (cfs)
4.00
3.00
2.00
1.00
-' ' 0.00
18 20 22 24 26
Time (hrs)

Hydrograph Report
s
Hydraflow Hydrographs Extension for AutoCAD® Civil 3D® 2012 by Autodesk, Inc. v9 Wednesday, 05 / 14 / 2014
Hyd. No. 3
Prop. UG Detention DA
Hydrograph type
= SCS Runoff
Peak discharge
= 9.370 cfs
Storm frequency
= 2 yrs
Time to peak
= 11.93 hrs
Time interval
= 2 min
Hyd. volume
= 20,463 cuft
Drainage area
= 2.050 ac
Curve number
= 94"
Basin Slope
= 0.0%
Hydraulic length
= Oft
Tc method
= User
Time of conc. (Tc)
= 5.00 min
Total precip.
= 3.60 in
Distribution
= Type II
Storm duration
= 24 hrs
Shape factor
= 484
Composite (Area /CN) = [(1.850 x 98) + (0.200 x 61)1/ 2.050
Prop. UG Detention DA
Q (cfs) Hyd. No. 3 -- 2 Year {cfs)
10.00 10.00
8.00 8.00
6.00 6.00
4.00 4.00
2.00 2.00
0.00 0.00
0.0 2.0 4.0 6.0 8.0 10.0 12.0 14.0 16.0 18.0 20.0
Hyd No. 3 Time (hrs)

Hydrograph Report
Hydraflow Hydrographs Extension for AutoCAD® Civil 3130 2012 by Autodesk, Inc. v9
Hyd. No. 4
UG Detention Routing
Hydrograph type
= Reservoir
Peak discharge
Storm frequency
= 2 yrs
Time to peak
Time interval
= 2 min
Hyd. volume
Inflow hyd. No.
= 3 - Prop. UG Detention DA
Max. Elevation
Reservoir name
= UG Detention -R -Tank
Max. Storage
ge indication method used.
Q (cfs)
10.00
8.00
[Ago]
4.00
2.00
UG Detention Routing
Hyd. No. 4 -- 2 Year
7
Wednesday, 05 / 14 1 2014
= 1.777 cfs
= 12.10 hrs
= 20,449 cult
= 497.23 ft
= 7,686 cuft
Q (cfs)
10.00
8.00
M
4.00
e
0.00
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 0.00
Hyd No. 4 - Hyd No. 3 G11 Total storage used = 7,686 cuft Time (hrs)

Pond Report 8
Hydraflow Hydrographs Extension for AutoCAD® Civil 3D® 2012 by Autodesk, Inc. v9 Wednesday, 05 / 14 / 2014
Pond No.1 - UG Detention -R -Tank
Pond Data
Pond storage is based on user - defined values.
Stage / Storage Table
Stage (ft) Elevation (ft) Contour area (sgft) Incr. Storage (cult) Total storage (cuft)
0.00
0.50
1.00
1.50
2.00
2.50
3.00
3.50
4.00
4.50
500
5.50
6.00
6.30
6.50
6.80
6.96
7.96
8.96
9.96
493.14
493.64
494.14
494.64
495.14
495.64
496.14
496.64
497.14
497.64
498.14
498.64
499.14
499.44
499.64
499
n
5 _.
�01.10
502.10
503.10
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
',
'd DFU,.6n /a
*Ay�n/a
n/a
n/a
0 0
942 942
943 1,885
942 2,827
942 3,769
943 4,712
942 5,654
943 6,597
942 7,539
942 8,481
943 9,424
942 10,366
942 11,308
566 11,874
377 12,251
320 F�� 13,1836
49 513,185
49 3,234
4 3,283
Culvert / Orifice
Structures
Weir Structures
[A]
[B] [C] [PrfRsr]
[A] [B]
[C] [D]
Rise (in)
=
24.00
6.00 0.00 0.00
Crest Len (ft)
= 49.00 7.00
0.00 Inactive
Span (in)
= 24.00
6.00 0.00 000
Crest El. (ft)
= 503.10 500.10
0.00 0.00
No. Barrels
=
1
1 1 0
Weir Coeff.
= 3.33 2.60
3.33 333
Invert El. (ft)
= 493.14
493.14 0.00 0.00
Weir Type
= 1 Broad
Rect Rect
Length (ft)
= 63.00
0.00 0.00 0.00
Multi -Stage
= Yes Yes
Yes Yes
Slope ( %)
=
1.81
0.00 0.00 n/a
N -Value
=
.013
.013 .013 n/a
Orifice Coeff.
= 0.60
0.60 0.60 060
Exfil.(in /hr)
= 0.000 (by Wet area)
Multi -Stage
= n/a
Yes Yes No
TW Elev. (ft)
= 0.00
Note. Culven/Orfioe outflows are analyzed under inlet (ic) and outlet (oc)
control Weir risers checked for
orifice conditions (ic) and submergence (s)
Stage ! Storage
/ Discharge Table
Stage Storage
Elevation
Clv A Clv B Clv C
PrfRsr
Wr A
Wr B Wr C
Wr D Exfil User
Total
ft cuft
ft
cfs cfs cfs
cfs
cis
cfs cfs
cfs cis cfs
cfs
0.00
0
493.14
0.00 0.00
- --
0.00
0.00 --
- -- - --
0.000
0.05
94
493.19
0.01 is 0.01 is -
0.00
0.00 --
-
0.007
0.10
188
493.24
0.03 is 0.03 is -
- --
0.00
0.00 - --
- -- - --
0.026
0.15
283
493.29
0.06 is 0.06 is --
- --
0.00
0.00 - --
- - --
0.057
0.20
377
493.34
0.11 is 0.10 is -
-
0.00
0.00 --
- -- - -- -
0.100
0.25
471
493.39
0.15 is 0.15 is -
-
0.00
0.00 -
-- - -
0.149
0.30
565
493.44
0.21 is 0.21 is --
-
0.00
0.00 -
- - -
0.205
0.35
659
493.49
0.27 is 0.27 is -
--
0.00
0.00 --
- - -
0.271
0.40
754
493.54
0.35 is 0.33 is -
- --
0.00
0.00 -
- -
0.335
0.45
848
493.59
0.41 is 0.40 is - --
-
0.00
0.00 -
- - -
0.401
0.50
942
493.64
0.48 is 0.45 is - --
-
0.00
0.00
- - -
0.452
0.55
1,036
49369
0.52 is 0.49 is - --
-
0.00
0.00 -
-- -
0.489
0.60
1,131
493,74
0.52 is 0.52 is - --
--
0.00
0.00 -
- - -
0.525
0.65
1,225
493.79
0.56 is 0.56 is - --
--
0.00
0.00
- - -
0.560
0.70
1,319
493.84
0.60 is 0.59 is - --
-
0.00
0.00 - --
-- -
0.595
015
1,414
493.89
0.64 is 0.62 is - --
--
0.00
0.00 - --
- - -
0.623
0.80
1,508
493.94
0.65 is 0.65 is - --
-
0.00
0.00 -
- - -
0.651
0.85
1,602
493.99
0.69 is 0.68 is - --
-
0.00
0.00 -
-
0.684
0.90
1,696
494.04
0.73 is 0.71 is - --
-
0.00
0.00 -
-
0.708
0.95
1,791
494.09
0.74 is 0.74 is - --
-
0.00
0.00 -
- - -
0.737
1.00
1,885
494.14
0.78 is 0.76 is - --
0.00
0.00 -
- -
0.762
1.05
1,979
494.19
0.79 is 0.79 ic - --
-
0.00
0.00 -
- - --
0.788
Continues on next page...

9
UG Detention -R -Tank
Stage /`Storage /
Discharge Table
Stage
Storage
Elevation
Clv A
Clv B Civ C
PrfRsr Wr A
Wr B
Wr, C Wr ,D Exfil User. Total'
ft "
CA
ft
cfs
cis C%
cfs cfs
cis
cfs cfs- cfa cfs cis
1 10
2,073
49424
0 84 Ic
0 81 Ic -
- 0100
boo
- -
- 0 812
1 ,15
2,168
494 '29
0 84 Ic
0 84 is -
= 0 00
0 00
- = - 0 838
120
2,262
49434
0 89 Ic
0 86 Ic -
- 000
000
-
- 0 859
1 25
2,356
49439
0 89 Ic
0 68 is --
= 000
0100
- - - 0 884
130
2,450
49444
6 90,IC
090-16 -
-- 066
000
- 0 903
1 35
2,544
49449
0 95 Ic
0 93 Ic -
000
0100
- 0 928
6
140
2,639
49454
0 95 Ic
0 95 Ic -
== 000
0'00
- - 950
1 45
2,733
494' 59
1,01,1C
0 97 Ic -
- 0 00
0 00
- - 0 969
1 50
2,827
49464
1 01 Ic
0 89 Ic =
- 0 00
000
- -
- 992
1 55
2,921
494`69
1 01 Ic
1 01 Ic -
- 000
0.00
- 1 012
160
3,015
494 74
1 071c
1 03 Ic -
- 0 00
000,
- 1030
1 65
3,110
49479
1 07 is
1 05 Ic =
000
0 00
- _ -- 1'052
-
1 70
3,204
49484
1 071c
1 07 Ic -
- 000
0 00
- - 1 071
1 75
3,298
49489
1 13,ic
1 09 Ic -
- 000
0'00
- - - - 1088
180
3,392
49494
1 11Ic
1 11 Ic --
- 000
boo
= =
185
3,486
494 99
1 13 Ic
1 13 Ic -
- 0 00
000
1 108
-
- 1' 128
1 90
3,581
49504
114 Ic
1 14 Ic -
- 000
000
- - 1 yqq
1 95
3,675
495'09
1 20 Ic
1 16 Ic -
- 0 00
000
- 1-162
200
3,769
49514
1 20 Ic
1 18 Ic -
- 000
000
= - -
205
3,86'3
49519
' 126 IC
"1.20 °ia =
- -0,00
0010,
-1181
--- - - 1 199
210,
3,958
495 24
126 Ic
1 21 Ic
000
000
-
- 1 214
2 15
2,20
4,052
495 29
1 26 Ic
1 23 Ic -
- 0 00
000
= - Y 1232,
4046
49534
126 Ic
1 251c - --
-- 0100
0 00
1 250
2'25
2
4,241
495 39
1 27 IC
1 27 Ic --
- 666
0'00
- - r - 1 267
30
4,335
49544
128 �
1 28 Ic -
= 000
0 00
-
= 1 281
235-
240
4',429
4;5i3
49546
49554
1 33 -ic
1 30,ic - --
_ 0,00
0'00
- - 1 298
245
4,618
495 59
1 33 Ic
1 33 Ic
1 321c - --
1 33
- 0 00
000
= - - 1 315
250
4,712
49564
1 35 ic,
Ic -
135 is
- 0 00
- 0 00
0 00
000
- 1'332
255
4,806
4956-9
141 Ic
1 36 Ic -
- 0 00
600
- 1'346
-
- - 1 361
2 60
4,900
495'74
141 Ic
1 38 Ic -
_ 0 00
000
- - 1 377
265
4,995
49579
1 41 Ic
1 39 Ic -
--- 0100
0 00
- - 1:343
2'70
5,069
49584
1 41 Ic
141 Ic -
- 0 00
000
- -
- - 1 409
275
5,183
49589
1 42 -ic
142 is -
- 000
000
- 1 422
280
2
5,277
5,371
49594
"99
1 48,ic
1 44, IC =
- 0 00
0 00
-
- - 1 436
85
495
1 48'ic
145 is
= 000
000
- 1 452
290
5,466
49604
148 Ic
1 47,ic -
= 000
000
= 1 467
295
5,560
496 09
1 48 Ic
1 48 is
0 00,
0100
- - - - 14-2
3 00
5,654
496 14
1 5010
1 50,16 -
000
000
3 05
5,748
49619
166 Ic
1 51 Ic -
- 000
0 00
- - 1 495
-
- - - 1 508
3,10
5,843
49624
1'56 Ic
1 52 Ic
- 000
0 00
- 1 523
315
5,937
49629
1 56 is
1 54 Ic -
- 000
000
- - 1 537
320
6,031
49634
1 56 is
1 55 Ic =
- 000
000
- 1 552
325
6,125
49639
1 671c
1 57 is -
- 0 °00
0 00
-
- 1'566
330
3 35
6,220
6,314
49644
49649
1 58 Ic
1 ,64 Ic
1 5811C
1 59
0 00
0 00
1 578
340
6;408
49654
1 64 IC
Ic -
1 60 -Ic -
- 0 00
- 0 00
0.00
000
= - - 1 591
345
6,503
46659
164 Ic
1 62 is -
0 00
0 00
- 1 605
-
- - 1 619
350
6,597
49664
` 1 64 Ic
1; 63 Ic -
- 000
0.00
- - 1 632
,3 55
6,691
49669
165 Ic
1 65 Ic -
- 000,
000
- -
= '1645'
3+60
6,785
49674
1 66 Ic
1 661c -
- 0100
0,00
- - 1 657
365
6,880
49679
1.7,3 Ic
1 67 is -
- 000
0-00,
- - - 1 669
370
6,974
49684
1.73 Ic
1.68 is =
= 000
0 60 ,
- - 1682
375
7,068
496.89
)-7&IC
1 70 Ic
- 0 00
0 00
- - 1 696
3 80
7,162
496 94
X1.73 Ic
1 71 Ic _
- 006
000
- - - - 1 709
3,85
7,256
49699
1 73 Ic
1' 72 Ic -
0 00
0,60
-
1 722
3.90
7;351•
497/04
1.73,ic
1 73,Ic -
-- 0 00
0 00
- 1 734
3:95
7,445
40709
1 74 Ic
1 74 Ic =
- 000
000
= 1 745
400
7,539
49714
1 .81 Ic
1 76 Ic
000
0 00
-- - - 1 757
4,05
410
7,633-
497 19'
1.81 Ic
1 7716 =
= 000
'0.00
- 1 769
7,727
49724
-1,81 Ic
1 78 Ic
- 000
000
- 1 782
415
420
7,822
49729
1 61 Ic
1 791c -
- 000
0-00
1 795
7,916
497 34
1 8fic
181 Ic -
- 000,
060
4.25
8,010
49739
Ic
1 82 Ic -
0 00
000
- - -
- 1 807
4 30
8,164
49744
.1-82
L83 IC
1 83 IC -
0 00
0.00
- - 1 818,
- -- -
435
.8,198
497,.49
1.901c
1841c
- 000
0;00
1 829
- - 1846
-
4,40
8,293
49754
1.90 Ic -
1 85 Ic -
- 000
0.00
1 852
445
8,387
497 59
1;90 Ic
1 86' Ic -
- 000
OAO
-= _ 1 864
450
8,481
49764
1.901c
1 ,88 Ic --
- 0 00
0.00
1 876
455
8,575
49769
1, 60 Ic
1 89 Ic -
- 0,00,
0 00
= - __ - 1 888
Continues on next page,

10
UG Detention -R -Tank
Stage/
Storage / Discharge
Table
Stage
Storage
Elevation
Clv A
Clv B Clv C
PrfRsr Wr A
Wr B
Wr C, Wr D Exfil User Total
ft
cult
ft
cis
As cis
cfs cfs
cis
cis Cfs cis Cfs cis
4`60
8,670
49774
1 90'iC
1 90,10 -
- 000
000
- - - -- - 1900
465
8,764
49779
1 91 IC
191 IC =
- 000
000
- = -- - 1910,
470
8,858
49784
1 92 is
1 92 is --
- 000
000
- - -- - 1921
4`75
8,952
497489
1 99 IC
1 931c -
- 066
0.00
- - - - 1 932
480
9,047
497 94'
199 IC
1 94'iC -
- 000
000
_ _ - - - -- 1'943
485,
9,141
497.99
1 99,ic
1 95 is -
- 000
000
- - -- - 1955
4,90
9;235
49804
1s99'1c
1 97`ic -
°- 000
000
- - -- - 1 966
495
9,330
49809
1 99'iC
1 98' is -
- 000
000
- - - - 1977
500
9,424
49814
199 is
1 99 is -
- 000
000
= - - - i 989
1505
%518
49819
2 00'ic
2 00 is -
- 000
000
= - - _ 1 -999
5.10
9,612
49824
2 01 is
2 01 is -
- 0 00
000
- - -- - 2 009
515
9,707
498 29
2 08 IC
2 02 is -
- 000
000
= - - = 2019
520
9,801
49834
2 08 is
2 03 is -
0 "00'
0 00
- - - - 2 030
525
9,895
49839
2'08 is
204 is -
- 000
0'00
- - - -- 2041
.530
9,989
49844
2 08 is
2 05 is -
- 0 00
000
- - - - 2 052
535
101083
49849
2'08 is
2 06 is -
- 000
000
- - - - 2063
540
10,178
498,54
2108 is
2 07 is =
- 0 00
0100
= - - - 2 074
545
10,272
49859
2 08 iC
2 08 is -
- 000
000
- - - - 2084
550
10,366
49864
2'09 is
2 09 is -
- 000
000
- - -- -_ 2 094
555
10,460
49869
2=10 is
2 10 is -
- 0'00
000
-= - - - 2 103
5 50
10,554
49874
2'18 is
2 1,1 is -
- 000
000
- - - -- 2 113
565
10,649
49879
2 -18 iC
2 12 iC -
- 000
000
- - - = V24
5 70
10,743
49884
2,i8 is
2 13 is -
- 0 00
0 00
- - -- = 2-134
575
10,837
49889
2 18 is
2 14 is -
- 000
000
- - - - 2-145
5.80
10;931
49894
2'18,ic
21,511 s -
- 060
060
- - - = 2155
585
11,025
49899
2 18 is
2 17 is -
060
000
- - - - 2'165
590
11,120
49904
2 18 is
2 18 is -
- 000
000
- - - - 2176
5 95
11,214
49909
2 19 is
2 19,1c -
- 000
000
- - -, - 2 185
6 00
11,308
49914
2 19 IC
2 191c -
- 000
000
- - - - 2 194
6 03
11,365
499 17
2 20 is
2 20 is -
- 000
000
- - -- = 2 200
606
11,421
49920
2 21 ic-
2 21 is -
- 000
000
- - - - 2205,
609
11,478
49923
2 28'ic
2 21 is -
- 000
000
- - - - 2 211
612
11,534
49926
2 28 is
2 22 is -
- 000
000
- - - - 2 217
615
11,591
499 29
2 28 is
2 22,ic -
- 0 00
000
- _ - 2 223
618
11,648
49932
2 28 is
'2 23"16 -
- 000
000
- - -- - 2 230
621
11,704
49935
2 28 is
2 24 is --
- 000
606
- - - 2 236
624
11,761
49938
2 28ic
2 24ac -
- 000
000
- - - - 2 241
6.27
11,817
49941
2 28 is
2 251ic -
-- 000
600
- - - 2 247
630
11,874
49944
2 28 is
2 25 is --
- 000
0100
- -- - 2 253
6 32
11,,912
49946
2 28nc
2 26 is -
- 000
6-00
- - 2 -257
634
1 1,b49
49948
'2 28 is
2 26 is -
- 60-0
600
-- -- - 2 261
636,
' 11,967
49956
2 28 IC
2 27 is -
- 000
OW
- - - - 2 265
6'38
12,025
49952
2 ,28'ic
2 27 is -
- 0`00
0`00
- - - - 2 269
q40
12,063
49954
2 28'ic
2 27 is -
- 000
0 00
- - - - 2 273
642
12,100
499,56
2 28 is
2 28 is -
= 006
000
- - -- - 2 277
6'44
12;138
49958
2 28 is
2 28 is -
- 000
000
- - - 2.281
646
12,176
499'60
2 28 is
2 28 is -
_ 0 00
0,00
- _ - 2284
048
12,213
44962
2'29 is
2 29 is =
= 000
000
- - -- - 2 288
650
12;251'
49964
229 is
2 29 is -
- 000
000
- - -- - 2 291
6 53
12,308
49967
2 30 IC
2 30 is -
= 000
000
- - - - 2 297
656
12,364
49970
2 30 is
2 30 iC -
- 000
000
- - - -- 2 302
659
12,421
499-73
2 38 is
211 is -
- 0100
'0 00
= - - - 2 307
662
12,477
49976
2'38 is
2 81 is -
- 000
000
- - - - 2 313
665
12,534
49976
238 is
2 32 is -
- 000
000
- - - - 2 319
;6 68'
12;590
499 62
238 is
2 32 is -
- 000
000
- - -- - 2 325
6 71
12;647
49985
238 is
2'33 is
_ 0 00
0 00.
- - -_ 2 331
6 74
12,703
49988
2 38 is
2 34 is -
- 000
boo
- - -- - '2336
67,7
12;760
49991
2 38 is
2 34 is -
- 0 00
000
- -, - - 2 342
680
12;816'
49994
2 38 is
2 35,ic --
--- 0 00
0 00
- _ -- - 2 348
682
12;848
49996
2 38 is
2 35 is -
- 000
000
= _ - =- - 2 351
683
12;880
499 97,
2'3B,ic
2 Wic --
- 000
0 00
- - - = 2 354
6 85
12,912
499 99
2 38 is
2.36,ic =
- 0 00
6-00
- - -- - 2 357
686
12,944
50000
2 38 is
2 36 is -
= 000
000
- - - 2 360
688
12,976
50002
2'38 is
2 36,'ic -
000
000
- - 2 363
690
13,008
50004
2 38 is
2 37'ic =
= 0 00
0.00
- - - - 2 366
691
13;040
50005
2 38 is
2 37 is --
= 000
000
- - -- - 2369
693
13,072
50007
2 38 is
12 373ic --
- 000
0'00
- - - - 2 372
694
13,104
50008
2 38,ic
2 371ic --
- 000
0:00
- - - - 2 375
606
13,436
50010
2 38 is
2 361c -
-- 000
000
- - - -- - 2 378
706
13,141
50026
3 63,ic
2 38'ic -
- 000
658
- -- -= 2,956
Contrnues'on next page

I
-
11'
UG Detention -R -Tank
Stage,/
Storage /' Discharge'Table
Stage
Storage
Elevation
Clv A
Clv B Clv C
PrfRsr Wr A,
Wr B Wr C
Wr D Exfil User Total
A
tuft
ft
cis
cis cfs
cfs cfs
cfs cfs
cfs cfs cfs cis
7 16
13,146
50030
4 03 is
2 38 is —
= 000
163 —
— — — 4 004
726
13,151
50040
5 46 is
2 37 +c —
-- 000
2 99 ,, --
— — 5 356
736
13,156,
'13;1611
50050
7 00 is
2 35 ic. —
-- 000
460 —
— — — 6 959
7 46
50060
8 78 is
2 34 is --
— OM
6 44 —
— — — 8'776
7, 56
13,165
50070
10 88 is
2 32 is —
— 000
846 —
– — 10 78
766
13,170
50080
12 99 is
2 30 is --
— 000
1066 --
-- — _ 12 96
7 76
13,175
50090
15 29 is
2 -26 is —
— 000
1302 —
-- — 15 2g
786
13,180
501 00
17 75 is
2 21 is —
— 0 00
15 54 —
— — - 1775
7-96
13,185
501 10
20 35 is
2 151c, —
— 000
18 20 —
_ -- — 2035
806
13,190
5'012 0
23 �06 is
2 06 is =
— 060
21'00 —
— — — 2305
816
13,195
50130
25 87 is
1 95 is –•
— 000
23.92 —
— — = 25 87
826
13;200
50140
28 78;ic
1 86 is —
— 000
2698 —
— — 2878
836
13,205
501 50
31 77 is
1,62)c —
— 000
3015 —
— — _ 3177
'8 46
13;210
50160
34 83'1c
1'3g is —
— 060
3344 —
— — — 34 83
6 56
13,214
501 70
37 46 is
1 13 is —
— 000,
36-33,s —
— — 3746
866
13,219
50160
38 52 is
162 is =-
— 0 00
37�5Q,s —
— — — 38 52
876
13,224
,50.1 90
39 33 is
0,94 ic —
-- 000
38 38's —
— — — 3933
8'86
13,229
50200
4000 is
0 88 is —
— 000
39 12 s —
— _ — , 4000
896
13,234
502 10
40 59 ic,
0 82 is —
— 000
39 76 s —
— — -- ' 4059
9 06
13,239
'502 20
41 Ut is
047,ic =
— '000
40 34 s —
-- _ — 41 11
9 16
13,244
502'30
41 59 is
0 73'ic —
— 0.00
40 86 s =
-- — = 41 59
926
13,249
50240
42 04 is
0 69 is --
-- 0 00
41 34 s —
-- _ = 42 03
936
13,254
502 50
42 45 is
0 66 is —
-- 0 00
41 79 s. —
-- — — 4245
946
13;259
50260
42 841c
0 62, is —
— 000
42 21 s —
-- -- — 42£84
9 56
13,263
502 70
43 21 is
0 60.ic —
— 006
42 61 s --
— — — 4321
966
13;266
50280
43 571c
0 57 is --
— 000
43`00 s --
— – = 4356
976
13;273
50290
43 91 is
0 54 is –
— 0 60
3 36 s —
4336s-
— -- — 4391
9 86
13,278
50300
44 24 is
052 is --
— 000
437 1 s —
_ — — 4423
916
13,283
503 10
44 56 is
0 50 is --
— 066
4465's —
-- = — 4455
End
I

8
S'
U
c�2
aE
1° w
� cl
i pr
O S
'i
I
a�
ZI
0
a�
Q CD
I i o i �I 1 �I i a 1- cl
C
N
d
�
r
0
�
N i
u7
O I
t0
�
d
>
N
u
L
w
CL
c�
N1
d
i
N
c
O
O
100)
J
I�
mz
a
rn
IL
U
.
,l
�o
o
,M
i
cc
U
Y
c
r
A
CL
>
I
N
a
E
T)
CL
!
N
c
Ol
i
3
41
a

12
Hydrograph Summary Re po -I-lydraflow Hydrographs Extension for AutoCADO Civil 3138 2012 by Autodesk, Inc. v9
Hyd.
No.
Hydrograph
type
(origin)
Peak
now
(cfs)
Time
interval
(min)
Time to
Peak
(min)
Hyd.
volume
(cult)
Inflow
hyd(s)
Maximum
elevation
(ft)
Total
strge used
(cuft)
Hydrograph
Description
1
SCS Runoff
13.28
1
718
26,822
- - --
- --
- - - - --
Existing
2
SCS Runoff
7.643
2
718
15,286
- - --
- - - - --
- --
Prop. Offsite DA
3
SCS Runoff
14.52
2
716
32,672
- - - --
- - --
---- --
Prop. UG Detention DA
4
Reservoir
2.321
2
726
32,658
3
499.80
12,557
UG Detention Routing
q
G^)
Walgreens - Prelim Pre vs. Post -R -Tank Ch
Raba nlBOGWPIgpftar
Wednesday, 05 / 14 / 2014

Hydrograph Report 13
Hydraflow Hydrographs Extension for AutoCAD® Civil 3D® 2012 by Autodesk, Inc, v9 Wednesday, 05 / 14 12014
Hyd. No. 1
Existing
H
ydrograph type
= SCS Runoff
Peak discharge
= 13.28 cfs
Storm frequency
= 10 yrs
Time to peak
= 11.97 hrs
Time interval
= 1 min
Hyd. volume
= 26,822 cuft
Drainage area
= 3.910 ac
Curve number
= 64'
Basin Slope
= 0.0%
Hydraulic length
= 0 ft
Tc method
= User
Time of conc. (Tc)
= 5.00 min
Total precip.
= 5.38 in
Distribution
= Type II
Storm duration
= 24 hrs
Shape factor
= 484
' Composite (Area /CN) = + (1.900 x 69) + (2.010 x 60)] / 3.910
Q (cfs)
14.00
12.00
10.00
8.00
M-1
4.00
2.00
13M
Existing
Hyd. No. 1 -- 10 Year
Q (cfs)
14.00
12.00
10.00
1.3901
. M
4.00
2.00
rITiLI
U z 4 ti 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26
Hyd No. 1 Time (hrs)

14
Hydrograph Report
Hydraflow Hydrographs Extension for AutoCAD® Civil 3D® 2012 by Autodesk, Inc. v9
Wednesday, 05 / 14 / 2014
Hyd. No. 2
Prop. Offsite DA
Hydrograph type
= SCS Runoff
Peak discharge
= 7.643 cfs
Storm frequency
= 10 yrs
Time to peak
= 11.97 hrs
Time interval
= 2 min
Hyd. volume
= 15,286 cuft
Drainage area
= 2.350 ac
Curve number
= 65*
Basin Slope
= 0.0%
Hydraulic length
= 0 ft
Tc method
= User
Time of cone. (Tc)
= 5.00 min
Total precip.
= 5.38 in
Distribution
= Type II
Storm duration
= 24 hrs
Shape factor
= 484
Composite (Area/CN) = [(0.200 x 98) + (1.500 x 61) + (0.340 x 60) + (0.310 x 69)] / 2.350
Q (Cfs)
8.00
Id oe
4.00
2.00
0.00 L 1
0 2 4
Hyd No. 2
Prop. Offsite DA
Hyd. No. 2 -- 10 Year
6 8 10 12 14 16
Q (cfs)
8.00
1111.
4.00
2.00
' J 0.00
18 20 22 24 26
Time (hrs)

Hydrograph Report 15
Hydraflow Hydrographs Extension for AutoCAD® Civil 3D® 2012 by Autodesk, Inc. v9 Wednesday, 05 / 14 / 2014
Hyd. No. 3
Prop. UG Detention DA
Hydrograph type
= SCS Runoff
Peak discharge
= 14.52 cfs
Storm frequency
= 10 yrs
Time to peak
= 11.93 hrs
Time interval
= 2 min
Hyd. volume
= 32,672 cuft
Drainage area
= 2.050 ac
Curve number
= 94'
Basin Slope
= 0.0%
Hydraulic length
= 0 ft
Tc method
= User
Time of conc. (Tc)
= 5.00 min
Total precip.
= 5.38 in
Distribution
= Type II
Storm duration
= 24 hrs
Shape factor
= 484
' Composite (Area /CN) = ((1.850 x 98) + (0.200 x 61)) / 2.050
Q (cfs)
4C ne%
12.00
• lM
AM
�d
U.0 2.0
Hyd No. 3
Prop. UG Detention DA
Hyd. No. 3 -- 10 Year
4.0 6.0 8.0 10.0 12.0
Q (cfs)
15.00
12.00
lll�
. 10
3.00
;8$$'
14.0 16.0 18.0 20.0
Time (hrs)

Hydrograph
Report
16
Hydraflow Hydrographs Extension for AutoCAD® Civil 3D® 2012 by Autodesk, Inc. v9
Wednesday, 05 / 14 / 2014
Hyd. No. 4
UG Detention Routing
Hydrograph type
= Reservoir
Peak discharge
= 2.321 cfs
Storm frequency
= 10 yrs
Time to peak
= 12.10 hrs
Time interval
= 2 min
Hyd. volume
= 32,658 cuft
Inflow hyd. No.
= 3 - Prop. UG Detention DA
Max. Elevation
= 499.80 ft
Reservoir name
= UG Detention -R -Tank
Max. Storage
= 12,557 cuft
Storage Indication method used
UG Detention Routing
Q (cfs) Q (cfs)
Hyd. No. 4 — 10 Year
15.00 15.00
12.00 12.00
9.00 9.00
6.00 6.00
3.00 3.00
0.00 0.00
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26
Time (hrs)
Hyd No. 4 Hyd No. 3 9T -D-LJ Total storage used = 12,557 cult

Hydraflow Rainfall Report
1.7
Hydraflow Hydrographs Extension for AutoCAD® Civil 3D®,2012 by Autodesk, Inc. v9 Wednesday, 05 / 14 / 2014
Return
Period
(Yre)
Intensity - Duration - Frequency Equation Coefficients (FHA)
- - - -
B
D
- E
(N /A) -
1
00000
00000
0,0000
40
2
740559
133000
08788
--
3
00000
00000
00000
---
5
835115
148000
08514
- - --
10
1057041
168000
08710
4'65
25,
1189249
176000
08582
- ---
50
1370265
186000
08630
1 70
100
1571766
196000
08692
--
File name ,Raleigh- Durham -NC -IDF OF
Intensity = 13,1(Tc,+ D)"E
Retum
Period
Intensity Values (in/hr)
- - - -
(Yrs)
5 min
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
50 i
- 55
60
1
000
000
000 1
000
000
000
0100
000
000
000
000
000
2
576
4'65
392
340
301
2170
245
225
208
1 93
1,81
1 70
3
000
0.00
000
0'00
000
000
000
'0 00
000
000
000
000
5
657
543
u
464
407
363
328
3,00
276
257
2 "40
225
212
10
722
603
519
457
409
371
340
313
291
272
256
241 '
25
819
690
598
529
475
432
397
367
341
320
301
284
50
895
759
660
586
527
480
441
408
381
357
336
317
100
971
827
722
642
579
528
486
4 50
420
393
3 70
350
fc = time in minutes 'Values may'exceed 60.
Precip. file name. C:\UsersliorornrkUlnrumanfci-¢tnm —f..unc -Dt-o
- -- _- - - -_ - --
Storm
Distribution
...... - wl 1 11 —Nano: n- vu:llafll-IVtrrreGl
Rainfall Precipitation Tabl6(in)
- - - —
1 =yr
2 -yr
3 -yr
5 -yr
10-yr
251yr
50 -yr
_
100 -yr
SCS 24 -hour
000
360
000
465
538
641
721
800
SCS 6 -Hr
0100
265
000
338
390
462
519
575
Huff -1st
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
Huff -2nd
000
000
000
000
000
0,00
000
000
Huff -3rd
000
000
'000
000
000
000
000
00-0
Huff -4th
000
600,
000
000
000
000
000
0,00
Huff -Indy
000
060
000
000
000
000
000
000
Custom
000,
0 00
000
000
000
0100
000
0100

I Stormwater Management pouting Calculations
3.3 .Nitrogen Loading Calculations

k
S
d
/
E
0
/
LA
$
�
�2
/CL§
a.�
\
\
U
}
/
cm
S
k
/
k
°SSS
¥8888
0\aa6caee6
E
�
CD «mac
E
!
�ucoo <o
�
o
§����� /��
goo /=e=oo
� a _� nm
�=o ooc=c
�
�
e §
�00000000
k
as���6aa6
�
�
■{$) #)�§i §7
=-
)\
2@848M4g8«
) « �
;o=0000000
P
�
{■
<
�
t
/
/
k7jj
C § § §q
�� -�
aren
/cone
\ =aan
{ \a \ \k
\2 C, ^
- - --
D
---
w_
)_
& #G "
I )\)(ow \�) /§m
/
2
\$j §§
o@$�m0
0
N
0-
E
E
§ID
§�
\(
/A
CL 0
CL u
CL
CL c
ca
/0
10
�-
�_
ID
\_E
\ )
.
\
® |2 ) `\k
�
/ `
`
_ _ t 5
\
�\ )
E
# \�«�� k x\22
L)\{|
� 7
/
/) \f\\ 0 2z��
/
$ 7_�«
--
`
£ ye
`\ 7�cm
§�
fff }ƒ)� I \ /$)k
\
\ \dEw
2� §rte
z2%f{ {/
e3@Ec)� & I
:
-
in 0
{
I.—
kk$ \LL ģ
M(L° a (L IL
\
\
U
}
/
cm
S
k
/
�
<�uo��o
=-
\
\
U
}
/
cm
S
k
/

4., Miscellaneous Maps /Reports
4.1 Soils Report

IN
of
0 ti n "�� �• 1��• ?lt i ji
ol
r �R
i 7 ��

Preface
Soil surveys contain information that affects land use.planning in survey areas: They
highlight soil limitations that affect various land uses and provide information about
the properties of the soils in the survey areas. Soil surveys ,are designed for many
different users, including farmers,jranchers, foresters, agronomists „urban planners,
community officials, engineers, developers, builders, and home buyers. Also,
conservationists, teachers, students, and specialists in recreation, waste disposal,
and pollution control carnuse the,surveys to help them understand,iprotect, or enhance
the environment.
Various land use regulations of Federal, State, and local govemments.may impose
special restrictions on land use or land treatment. Soil surveys identify,soil properties
that are used in making various land use or land treatment decisions. The information
is intended to help the land users identify and reduce the effects of soil limitations on
various land uses. The landowner or useris responsible forldentifying and complying
with existing laws and regulations.
Although soil survey information can be used for general farm, local, and wider area
planning, onsiteInvestigationis needed,to supplement this information,in,some,cases.
Examples Include soil quality assessments (http: / /soils.usda.gov /sqi /) and certain
conservation and engineering applications. For more detailed information, contact
your local, USDA Service Center (hftp: // offices .sc.egov.usda.gov /locato "r /app?
agency= nres),orlyour NRCS State Soil Scientist (hftp: / /soils.usda.gov /contact/
state_offices /).
Great differences in soil properties can occur'within short distances. Some soils are,
seasonally wet or subject to flooding. Some,are too unstable to be used,as a
foundation for buildings or roads. Clayey or wet soils are poorly suited to use as septic
tank absorption fields. A high water table makes a soil poorly suited to basements or
underground installations.
The National Cooperative Soil Survey is a joint effort of the United States Department
of Agriculture and other Federal agencies, State agencies including, the Agricultural
Experiment Stations, and local agencies. The Natural Resources Conservation
Service (NRCS) has leadership for the Federal part of the, National Cooperative Soil
Survey.
Information about soils 'is updated periodically. Updated information is available
through,the NRCS Soil Data Mart Web site or the NRCS Web Soil Survey. The Soil
Data Mart is the data,storage,stie for the official soil survey information.
The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA),prohibits,disciimination inall its!programs
and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, age, disability, and where
applicable, sex,.marital status, familial status, parental status, religion, sexual
orientation, genetic information, political beliefs,,reprisal, or because albor a part of an
Individual's income is derived from any public - assistance program. (Not all prohibited
bases apply to all programs.) Persons withAlsabilities who require alternative means
2

i
for communication of program Information, (Braille, large print, audiotape, etc.) should
contact USDA's TARGET Center at -(202) 720 -2600 (voice,and TDD).'To file a
complaint ofadisc imination, write to USDA, Director, Office of Civil Rights, 1400
Independence Avenue, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20250 -9410 or call (800) 795 -3272
(voice),or (202) 720 -6382 (TDD). USDAJs an equal opportunity provider and
employer.
3

Contents
Preface ....... ...... ....... .... ............. :.................................................
....:............... ..2
HowSoil Surveys Are Made .................................................... .........:....................5
Soil Ma -
Soil, Map..a ......................... :. ....:....::.- .:.. .:...........................:. ...........::
...... ........ .........
Legend...-' ..:: .:......:..:.....:...:...:.:.:..........:.:.:...:.::.:....:......:.:..... ..:...:.......................9
MapUnit Legend .............................................................-...... .............................10
MapUnit Descriptions ..................................................:........ .............................10
Wake County, North Carolina.: - --
..; ..................... z:;........... ...............................
AgB— Appling gravelly sandy loam, 2 to 6 percent slopes ..........................12
AgB2 Appling gravelly sandy loam, 2 to,6,percent slopes, moderately
eroded........................:............................................. .............................12
AgC— Appling gravelly sandy loam, 6 to 10 percent slopes ........................ 13
CnA=Colfax,sandy loam, -0 to 3,percent slopes ............ .............................14
Soil InformationIor AlhUses . : : ..:....:.::..::.::.::::: . - _ _ ._ - -- ..- ,......,,,,,,,,,.........16
.................... _
Soil Properties and Qualities......... _: - - - _.... _ - : . -.16
Soil Erosion Factors ......................
K-Factor, Rock Free,(Walgreens Leesville Strickland) ... ........:....................16
Soil Physical Properties .....:.....:......................................... .............................19
Available Water Capacity (Walgreens Leesville Strickland ) .:......................19
Saturated Hydraulic Conductivity (Ksat)- (Walgreens7Leesville
Strickland) .............................:.....................:.:.:.:..... .......:.....................23
Soil Qualities and Features ...............................:..........:..... .............................26
Drainage Class (Welgreens Leesville Strickland) .......... .............................26
Hydrologic Soil Group,(Walgreens Leesville Strickland) ...........................:.30
WaterFeatures ........:....................................:.................... .............................35
Depth to Water Table (Walgreens Leesville Strickland), .... !., .......... : .......... 35
Flooding Frequency Class (Walgreens Leesville Strickland) ........................ 39
References... ...:.................:.....:..........:::.......................:......... ........:.....:...:..........43
4

How Soil Surveys Are Made.___
Soil'surveys are made -to provide information about theaoils and miscellaneouwareas
Irna specs area. They include a description of thwsoils,and- miscellaneous area-wand
their location on the landscape and tables that show soil properties and limitations
affecting various uses. Soil scientists observed the steepness, length, and shape of
the slopes; the.general,pattem ofodrainage; °the kinds of crops and native plants; and
the,kinds of bedrock. They observed and described many soil profiles. A soil profile is
the sequence of natural layers, or horizons, in a soil. The profile extends1rom the
surface down into the unconsolidated material in Which the soil formed =or -from the
surface down to bedrock The "unconsolidated material is devoid of'roots.and other
living organisms and has, not been changed by other biological activity.
Currently, soils are mapped according to the boundaries of major land resource areas,
(MLRAs). MLRAs are geographically associated land resource units that'share
common characteristics related to physiography, geology, climate, water resources,
soils, biological resources,, and land uses (USDA, 2006). Soil survey areas typically
consist,of parts of one or, more MLRA.
The soils and miscellaneous areas in a survey area occur'in an orderly pattem'that is
related to the geology, landfomts, relief, climate, and natural vegetation of the area.
Each kind of soil;'and miscellaneous areaols,associated with a particular kind of
landforrn or with a segment of,the1s ndform. By observing the soils and miscellaneous
areas in the survey area and relating their position to specific segments of the
landform, a soil scientist develops a concept, or model, of how they Were formed. Thus,
during mapping, this model enables the soil sclentisthto predict with a `considerable
degree of accuracy the kind of'soil or miscellaneouis area at a specific location on the
landscape.
Commonly, individual soils,owthe landscape merge'into one,another as their
characteristics gradually change. To construct an accurate soil map, however, soil
scientists must determine the boundaries between,the soils. They can observe only
a limited number of soil profiles. Nevertheless, these observations, supplemented by
an understanding of the soil- vegetation4andscape relationship, are,sufficient to�verify
predictions of the kinds,of soil in an area and to determine -the boundaries.
Soil scientists.recorded the characteristics of the soil profiles,that,they studied. They
noted.soll color, texture..size and shape of "soil aggregates, kind and amount of rock
fragments, distribution of plant roots, reaction, and other features that enable them to
identify soils.,After describing the soils in the survey area and determining their
properties, the soil scientists assigned the rSOJIS to,taxonomic classes (units).
Taxonomic classes are concepts. Each'taxonomic class has a set of soil
characteristics with precisely defined limits. The classes,are used as a basis for
comparison,to classify'soils systematically. Soil taxonomy „,the system of taxonomic
classification used'in the ,United States, is based mainly on the kind andt character of
soil properties and the arrangement of horizons within the profile. After the soil
scientists classified and named the soils in the survey area, they,compared the

Custom Soil Resource Report
individual soils with similar,soils in the same taxonomic class in other areas so that
they could confirm data and�assemble additional,dataabased'',on experience and
research.
The objective of soil, mapping is not to delineate pure map, unit components; the
objective is to separate the landscape into1andforms,or landform segments that have
similar use and management requirements. Each map unit is defined by a unique
combination of soil components and/or miscellaneous areas in predictable
proportions. Some components maybe highly contrasting to the othercomponents of
,the map unit. The presence of minor'componentsin a map unit in no way diminishes
the usefulness,oraccuracy of the data. The delineation of such landforms and
landform segments on4he map provides sufficient information for the development of
resource plans. If intensive use of small areas is planned, onsite investigation is
needed to define.and;locate the,soils,and'miscellaneous areas.
Soil scientists make many field observations in the process of producing a soil map.
The frequency of observation Is dependent upon several factors, including scale of
mapping, intensity .,of mapping,ddesign of map , units ,complexity,of, the,landscape, and
experience of the soil scientist. Observations are made to test and refine the soil -
landscape model and predictions and to verify the classification of the soils at specific
locations. Once the,soil- landscapwmodel is refined,,a,significantly smaller numberrof
measurements of 'individual soil properties are made and -recorded. These
measurements may include field measurements, such as those for color, depth to
bedrock, and texture; and laboratory measurements, such as those for content of
sand, silt, clay, salt, and other components. Properties of`each soil typically vary from
one point,to another across the landscape.
Observations for map�unit components are aggregated to develop,ranges of
characteristics for the components. The aggregated values are presented. Direct
measurements do not,exist for every property presented,for every map unit
component. Values,for some properties are estimated from,combinations of'other
properties.
Whilez soil:survey i&in progress, samples,of'some of thwsoils in the area generally
are,collected for laboratory analyses and for engineering tests. Soil _scientists interpret
the data from these analyses and tests as well as the field- observed characteristics
and'thedsoil properties to determine1he expected behavior of +the soils,under different
uses. Interpretations for all of th&soils are field tested through observation of the,soils
in different uses and under different,levels of management. Some interpretations are
modified to fit local, conditions, and some new interpretations are developed'to meet
local needs. Data are assembled from other sources, such as research information,,
production records, and field experience of specialists. For example, data on crop
yields4nder defined levels of management are assembled from farm,records and from
field or plot experiments,on the;same kinds of soil.
Predictions aboutsoil'behavior are based not only on soil properties but�also on such
variables as climate and biological activity. Soil.conditions are predictable over long
periods of time, but they are not predictable from year to year. For example, soil
scientists can predict with a fairly high degree of accuracy`that a given soil will have
a high water table within certain,depths in most years, but they cannot predict that,a
high water table will always be at a specific level in the soil on a specific date.
After soil scientists located,,and identified the significant natural bodies of soil, in the
survey area, they drew the,boundaries of these bodies on aerial photographs and
identified each as ,a specific map unit. Aerial photographs,show trees, buildings, fields,
roads, and rivers, all of which help in locating boundaries. accurately.
6

Soil Map
The soil map section includes the soil map for the defined area of interest, a list of soil
map units on Use map and extent of each map unit~ and, cartographic,symbols
displayed'on the map. Also presented are various'metadate about data used to
produce the map, and a description of each soil map unit.
N

LEI I i �'�• i .
t .
I +
i
1�
I.
u;
C:
U
J
. G
lk
fV
7

CD
v
a
m m 5f
�•�� CD "Z $. g$ W age �c 3mm
Sn 9.
CUR g m ' 9 3
��ci d v` Ib
CD
a�M v m ad �� g=g �a
cr
G11a m m om' 31 O 3
3 a
x=
as
o ='gamy
7 �
I ��, �I�
J
mm
n
C
3
iC
X
CD
z
I! to
tn' m
m
Vi
m
v
g
3
L7
G7
A
n
m m°
to
w
<n
m
D al
° 'o m
�c
!o
_�
°
,�
°�_ m_
m
c
£ o
m '• 3
3
3�°,
en
0 m m
v
O
°
m
p
° °
f
(A
D
O
m
,�
m a
v,
a
D
Q
o
g
N
:C
C
C
,
m
m
v
;
a3
v
a
v
r
»
CA
_
o
o
m
m
�2
m
!A m
d�
a
m m 5f
�•�� CD "Z $. g$ W age �c 3mm
Sn 9.
CUR g m ' 9 3
��ci d v` Ib
CD
a�M v m ad �� g=g �a
cr
G11a m m om' 31 O 3
3 a
x=
as
o ='gamy
7 �
I ��, �I�
J
mm
n
C
3
iC
X
CD
z

Custom Soil Resource Report
Map Unit Legend
1 ^— _ __ - __.'y =lZ. 1 F°'*ni )y�Nt "8�" {IY C{ d% '�'+.'3� � /,7�
{�.%�:. �_'•1� �5'`' =Y l.'_ g .Y " -r! .1`H'h"X l4'r ��- Yke FJ:}fj .v
4.- .��sYi .�.r_ � .;i. .�'. v ±��.rma�•.�rt,� aa�cLFn
: ai:.- .Sr;`,..�+LL.ae,-..,�_._u� '4 "._._•.�� `� �._.tKs- 4`�'.i� "icy- .et,..,w1e 9
�.� �aa -a� _;.
llnR
=u'.i•� �•��sr -� �Lier'.X �r�.�'.-
rj. Named
;-,z.- -� �'.AOII„ - ��
a�
�`' "`?;'f Ppplit�01'i1W� `r'"t
I. 9 +Map ymboL`
•� ,MAAap Unit �,�1
�W .h!_ __.. :�'
..� _ � •,
AgB
Appling gravely sandy loam, 4o;
22,
- - - _ 50.1%
6 percent slopes
AgB2 I
Appling gravely sandy loam, 2 to
05
f 108%
6 percent slopes, moderately
i,
eroded
` -- _
- -` _ - - -
AgC
Appling gravely sandy loam, 6 to
1.2
28.5%
- - _ - —;
10 percent slopes _
- - - -
CnA
CoUax sandy loam,,0 to 3
0:5
10.6%,
percent slopes
Totals for Area of Interest ~ - - - --
- - - - 4.4
- - -- - 100.0%.
Map Unit Descriptions
The`map units delineated on the detailed soil maps in a soil survey represent the soils
or miscellaneous, areasin the survey area. The.map unit descriptions, along with the
maps, can be used to,determine the composition.and properties of,a unit.
A map unit delineation on a soil map represents an area dominated by one oir more
major kinds of soil or miscellaneous areas. A map unit Is identified and named
according to,the taxonomic "classification of the dominant soils. Within a taxonomic:
class there'are precisely defined limits forthe properties,of,the soils. On thedandscape,
however, the soils are natural phenomena, and,they have the characteristic variability
of.all natural,phenomena. Thus, the range of some observed properties may extend
beyond the limits defined for a taxonomic class. Areas,of soils,of a single taxonomic
class rarely, if ever, can be mapped without including areas of other taxonomic
classes. Consequently, every map unitis made up of the soils or miscellaneous,areas
for,which it,iw-named and some,minor components`that belong to taxonomic classes
other than those of the major.solis.
Mostminor soils have properties,similar to those of the dominant soil or soils in the
map unit, and thus they do not affeat,use and management. Thesware called
noncontrastirig; or similar, components. They may or may not be mentioned in a,
particular -map unit description. Other minor components, however, have properties
and behavioral characteristics divergent enough to affect use or to require different
management. Theseiare called contrasting, or dissimilar,, components. They generally
are in small areas and could not be mapped separately because of the scale used.
Some small areas of strongly contrasting soils,or miscellaneous areas are identified
by 4i special symbol on,the maps. If'lnduded in the database for a,given area, the
contrasting, minor components are Identified in the map unit description&along with
some characteristics of each. A few areas of minor components may not have been
observed, and consequently theyare not,mentioned in the descriptions, especially
where the pattem was so complex thatit was impractical,tomake enough observations
to identify all the soils and miscellaneous-areas on the landscape.
10

Custom�Soil,Resource Report
The presence,of minor components in a map unitin no way diminishes the usefulness
or accuracy of the data. The�objective of mapping is not to delineate pure taxonomic
classes but rather to separate the landscape into landforms or landforrn segments that
have similar use and management requirements. The delineation of such segments
on the map provides,sufficient information for the development of resource plans. If
intensive use of small areas is planned, however, onsite investigation is needed to
define and locate the soils and miscellaneous areas.
An ideritifying;symbol precedes ♦the +map}unit name in the,map unit, descriptions. Each
description includes general facts about the unit and gives important soil properties
and qualities.
Soils that have profiles that are almost alike make up a soil°series. Except'for
differences in- texture of the surface'layer, all the soils of'a series have major'horizons
that are similar iri composition, thickness, and arrangement
Soils of one series can differ in texture.of the surface layer, slope, stoniness,,salinity,
degrewof erosion, and -other characteristics that,affect their use. On,the;basis of such
differences, a soil series is divided into soil phases. Most of the areas shown on the
detailed soil maps are phases of soil series. The name of a soil phase commonly
indicates.a feature that affects,use or management.,Forexample,_ Alpha silt loam, 0
to 2 percent slopes, `Is a phase.of the Alpha series.
Some map units are made up of two or more major soils or miscellaneous areas.
These map units are complexes, associations„ or undifferentiated groups.
A complex consists of two or more sods or miscellaneou&areas in,such;an intricate
pattern or in such small areas that they cannot be shown separately on the maps. The
pattern and proportion of the-soils or miscellaneous areas are,somewhat similar in all
areas..Alpha -Beta complex, O,to 6 percent�slopes; Js an example.
An association is made up of two or more geographically associated soils or
miscellaneous areas that are shown as one unit on the maps. Because of presentror
anticipated uses of the map units In the,,survey area, it was not considered ,practical
or necessary to map the soils,or miscellaneou&areas separately. The pattern and
relative,proportion of the soils or miscellaneous areas are somewhat similar. Alpha -
Beta association, 0 to 2 percent - slopes, is,an example.
An undifferentiated 'group,is,made,up of two,or rrioressods of mscellaneous,areas that
could be mapped individually but are mapped as one unit because similar
interpretations can,be made for use and management. The pattern and proportion of
the soils or miscellaneous areas in a mapped area,are not,uniform. An area can be
made up of,only one of the major soils or miscellaneous areas, or it can'be,made up
of all of them. Alpha and Beta soils, 0'to 2 percent slopes, is an example.
Some surveys-include miscellaneous.areas. Such areas have little or no;soil material
and'support little or no vegetation. Rock outcrop is an-example. _ -
11

Custom Soil Resource Report
Wake County, North Carolina
AgB— Appling gravelly sandy loam, 2 to.6 percentslopes
Map Unit Setting
Elevation: 300.to 4504eet
Mean, annual,precipltation: 37 to 60 inches
Mean annual air temperature: 59 to,66 degrees F
Frost-free period: 20010 240 days
Map Unit Composition
Appling and similar soils: 90 percent
Description of Appling
Setting
Landform. Interfluves
LandformFposition (two - dimensional).- Summit
Landform position (three - dimensional): Interfluve
Down-slope, shape: Convex
Across -slope shape: Convex
Parent material: Residuum weathered from granite and gneiss
Properties and qualities
Slope:,210 6 percent
Depth to °restrictive feature: More than 80 inches
Drainage class:, Well drained
Capacity of the most limiting layer to.transmit`water (Ksat): Moderately high to, high
(0.57 to 1.98,in/hr)
Depth to water table: More than ,80 inches
Frequency,of flooding. None
Frequency of ponding: None,
Available water capacity. Moderate (abouV8.4 inches)
Interpretive groups
Farmland classification: All areas are prime farmland
Land capabil,o,(nonlnigated): ,2s
i4ydrologic,Soil Group: B
Typical profile
0 to 9- inches: Gravelly,sandy loam
9to 354nches: Clay
354o 46 inches, Clay loam
464o'80 inches: Loam
AgB2— Appling gravelly sandy loam, 2 to 6 percent slopes, moderately
eroded
Map Unit Setting
Elevation: 300 to 450 feet
Mean annual precipitation: 37 to 60 inches
12

Custom Soil Resource Report
Mean annual air temperature: 59 to 66 degrees F
Frost-free period: 200 to 240 days
Map Unit Composition
Appling, moderately eroded, and similar soils: 85 percent
Description of Appling,'Moderately Eroded
Setting
Landform: ' Interfluves
Landform position (two - dimensional): Summit
Landform position (three - dimensional): Interfluve
Down -slope shape: Convex
Across -slope shape :Convex
Parentmaterial. Residuum, weathered from,granite and',gneiss
Properties and qualities
Slope: 2 to 6 percent
Depth,to restrictive lbature: More than 80 inches
Drainage class. Well drained
Capacity,of the most °limiting layer to transmi64ater (Ksat): Moderately high to_ high
(0.57 to 1.98 in/hr)
Depth to water table: More than 86 inches
Frequency of flooding: None
Frequency of ponding. None
Available water capacity. Moderate (about 8.6 inches)
Interpretive=groups
Farmland classification: All,areas are-prime farmland
Land capability (nonirrigated): 2e
Hydrologic Soil Group: B
'Typical profile
0 to 4 inches: Gravelly sandy loam
4 to 35 inches: Clay
35 to 46 inches. Clay loam
464o 80 inches: Loam
,AgC— Appling gravelly sandy loam, 6 to 10',percent slopes
Map Unit,Setting
Elevation: 300 to, 450 feet
Mean annual precipitation: 37 to 60 inches
Mean annual air temperature: 59 to 66,degrees F
Frost free: period: 20010 240 days
Map Unit Composition
Appling and,similer soils: 85 percent
Description of Appling
Setting
Landfoim: Interfluves
13

Custom Soil Resource Report
Landfonn position (two - dimensional): Summit,,shoulder
,Landform,position (three - dimensional): Interfluve
Down7slope shape: 'Convex
Across -slope shape: Convex
Parent material. Residuum weathered from granite and gneiss
Properties and qualities
Slope: 6 to, 10 percent
Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches
Drainage class. Well drained
Capacity'of the, most limiting.layer,to transmit9water (Ksat): Moderately high to high
(0.57 to, 1.98, in/hr)
Depth to water table: More than 80 inches
Frequency of flooding., None
Frequency of ponding. None
Available water capacity: Moderate (about 8.4 inches)
Interpretive groups
Farmland cldssificatron: Farmland of statewide, importance
'Land capability (nonkrigated): 3s
Hydrologic Soil Group: B'
Typical profile
0 to 9 inches: Gravelly sandy loam
9 to 35 inches. Clay
95 to 46 inches: Clay loam
46 to Winches. Loam
CnA— Colfax sandy loam, 0 to 3 percent'slopes
Map Unit.Setting
Bevation: 200 to 1,400 feet
Mean annual precipitation: 37,to 60 inches
Mean annual air temperature: 59eto 66 degrees +F
Frost free period: 200 to 240 days
Map Unit Composition
Colfax and similar soils. 85 percent
Minor components: 5 percent
Description of Colfax
Setting
Landform: Depressions
Landform position (two-dimensional): Footslope
Down -slope shape: Concave
Across -slope shape: Concave
Parentmaterial: ,Loamy alluvium - and /or colluvium,over saprolite derived from granite
f and gneiss
Properties and qualities
Slope. 0 to 3 percent
14

Custom Soil Resource Report
Depth to restrictive'feature: 16 to 35 inches to fragipan; 40 to 60 inches to paralithic
bedrock; 60 to 80 inches to lithic bedrock
Drainage class. Somewhat poorly drained
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): Very low (0.00 to 0.00 in/
hr)
Depth, to water table: About 6 to 18 inches
Frequency of flooding: None
Frequency of ponding. None
Available water capacity.- Low (about 3.8 inches)
Interpretive groups
Farmland alassificadon: Farmland of statewide;importance
Land capability �(nonirrigated): 3w
,Hydrologic Soil'Group:,C /D
Typical profile
0 =to 7 inches: Zandy loam
7 to 14 inches: Sandy loam
14 to 294nches: Sandy cl_ay.loam
'29 to 48 inches: Sandy loam
48 to 594nches. Sandy loam
59 to 65 inches: Weathered bedrock
65 to 80 inches. Unweathered bedrock
Minor Components
Worsham, undralned
Percent of map unit. 3 percent
Landform: Depressions
Landform position (two - dimensional): Footslope
Down -slope shape: Concave
Across -slope shape: Concave
Wehadkes, undralned
Percent of;map unit. 2 percent
Landform: Depressions on flood plains
Down -slope shape: Concave,
Across -slope shape: Linear
15

4
t .
Sfioil lniformatidin °for All Uses
Soil- Properties and 'Qualifies
TheSoil'Properties,and Qualitle&secction includes,vadous soil properties,andqualities`
,displayedas thematic mapswith a;summary table for the soil,map units,initheiselected'
area,of interest,A,,single .value °or rating,for each map unit is generated by aggregating
the'interpretive ratings.,of individual map unit °components. This aggr'egatiomprocess
fsfdefined for each property�or,quality.
Soil Erosion ;Factors
Soil Erosion Factois{areisoil,propertiesiand interpretations used in evaluating the soil`
,for potential erosion. Example soil,erosion factors can include,K factor for the whole_
soil orlon a rock free basis; T factor, wind erodibility, group and'wind erodibilit P'index.,
K Factor, Rock, Free (Walgreens LeesyilIe Strickland)
Erosion,factor`K,indicates•the susceptibility,of -a soil,to sheet,arid rill erosion,by water.
Factor Kis one a(sixtfadois�usedin the�Universal ,Sdfi;Loss,Equation (LISLE) *idthe
Revised, Universal Soil L"o_ss Equation ,,(RUSLE) to,'predlct the averageeannual rate
soilAdssiby`sheet and rill4f6sion'in tons pe(acre'per year. The, estimates are.based
;primarily, }on,percentage of silt „sand, and orgahicnatter and on soil,structure and'
saturated, hydraulictbmductivity,,(Ksat). Values'of K;range�from 0.02 to?0:69. Other,
factors "being equal, the higher thew flue, the more susceptible,the}soil is,to sheet and
rill erosioneby water.
°Erosionafa6idr- W (rock free)" indicatesAthwerddibility ofAhe`fine- earth,frac4on, or the
matedal,lessAhan 2 millimetersAn,,size.
0
16

c
T
r
k
iv
n
m
K'
35° 5:1 2I' N
Custom Soil Resource Report
Map —K Factor, Rock Free (Walgreens Leesville Strickland)
A
IUXvj M5070 7051100 705130 705160
� 3
Map Sole: 1:1,220 if printed or A pcmak (8,5"x 11") sf- e
e
� N 0 15— 30 50 gp 8,
0 50 100 200 900
Map projection: Web Mercator Comer coordinates: WGS84 Edge tics: UTM Zone 17N WGS84
17
R
� 35° 54 3U N
n
�i
0
�o
n
�i
n
n
n
i
35° 54'21' N

00
O
301
S a
.Q+ N
c d
a
m O
Q)CD
< 3
m
�Q)
C
0
3
0
n
C
O
3
N
O
N
N
g
O
O
A
D
ti
E . N D ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
❑ ❑ ❑
2. Y!
E ❑ ❑ E
?
1 1
\
M
o r
cn O
Ln ON
$
A ((T W
V N OC
A O V
iJl O N
N 'p
N
o D
N
Q
�
o
m
O
� a
m
m
G
w
m
Q
N_
D
CD
d
m
v■■■■■
o a
o Cl o®■■■
(n
A Z
D
d
C
Ol
Ln A
A W
W N
N N -+
O O
m Z m
m A A
iJ W
N N
yqj
A
C" 10
W
N W
A O
O A
Cn cp W
V N
OD P
,
°
_ (D
a
^m^
J
>
m
0
0
Z
d
m
m
Q
a
u
Q
m
m
-4
0
�O0
y
0
O
O
z
d
m
0
m
.7
o
0
p yy
� G N
W
=
N
�
a
�
�
mr
n
N
-1
?O
NO
c O
O
m Qn0 N
to
0
M O
w
7 T
7_
��
on3i
_
� _
<
��
a��
= m
�m o.m
m
o
m
D.
o'D
�2
m
m� o
3
m _o
8
mq�+m��
.
O
$
��
o�
7 N'
gma
m m m
(D
(D
Fii
ac
4. G O
_�'
z
m
m
m
°
m W
c y m
3
H
o
g
y
m
v m
rm
aR
3 C Z
�m
v
m
m m
3
mm'
a
m
m
R. _
m R
m
5ya
m
b'o
o�
N�a�p to
oy c
Qx�
m
°a
n
�f9 '
Z
O
(A
Sr
(D
o gym
CD
m
=
m
3m
0
0
v
v
$
�
N
07 a
s�y
(� ��,
=Z
0v �'
a
m
D
m
—0
g
m0 $
H�
�_�'
on o
°
D
�
y
N
Z
o3i
m
m
3cm
3
vacs
R
mm Lo
9
o
v
B
aeon a�
v,
3
v
0 m g
n o � '
n
(n
CL
F' 3.
`8 8
m
N
Er
�
y
m O
n
C
O
3
N
O
N
N
g
O
O
A

Custom Soil Resource Report
Table —K Factor; Rock,Freef(Walgreens Leesville Strickland)
1 -��- � �K�FacloRoak
Free- 8umm
'-`Wake Coun
�� � unR � �y,,rf
�� �� Yntt�a' -� -�{. -C-"
°:�''[1•i(9 `fib ^�, ��i p r �-. "-•� - ,- -.as' l 4�i' -, '�.ix —�'_ "� ""'�-- .—;w-�
's
k' a Patriot of,�Abl :x
Aga
Applingigrevelly sandy 1,117
,I 2.2'
f '50.1°%
loam, 2'to 6 percent
- slopes
-
Aga2
Appling gravelly sandy
.17
{ 0:5
, -_- 108%
loam, -2 to,6 percent
;
slopes, moderately
_
eroded
Agc' _
Appling gravelly'sandy ,
'.17 i
; 1.2
I - _ � 28.5%
loam, 6, to 10 percent
;
slopes
CnA - _ — J—dotfax
sandy loam, 046 3
.17 — — I
0.5
— 10.6%
percent,slopes
--
--
ToteWfbr Area of Interest
4.4
-
100.0%
Rating, Option" Factor, Rock Free (Walgreens Leesville
Strickland)
Aggregation Method. Dominant Condition
Component Percent Cutoff- None Specified
Tie -break Rule: Higher
Layer Options (Horizon Aggregation Method): Surface Layer (Not applicable)
Soil Physical Properties
Soil Physical Properties are measured or inferred from direct observations- in the field
or laboratory. Examples of soil physical properties include percent day, organic
matter, - saturated hydraulic conductivity, available water,capacity, and bulk density.
Available Water Capacity (Walgreens Leesville
Strickland)
Available,water capacity (AWC) refers to the quantity ofmater that,the soil'is capable
of,storing for use bylplants. The capacity for water storage is, given In centimeters,of
water per centimeter of soil for each soil layer. The capacity varies, depending on soil
- properties,that affect retention of water.`T'he most important properties are the content
of'organic matter, soihtexture, bulk density,,,and soil structure, with,corrections for
salinity,and rock fragments. Available water capacity is an,important factor In the
choice of plants or crops to be,grown and in the design and management of irrigation
systems. It is not an estimate of the quantity of water actually available to plants at
any given time.
19

Custom Soil Resource Report
Available water supply,("S) is computed as AWC times the,thickness,of`the soil.
For example, if AWC is 0.15 cm/cm, the available water supply for 25 centimeters of
soil would-be 0.15'x25, or 3.75 centimeters of'vrater.
For each soil layer, AWC is recorded as three separate values in the database. A low
value }and a,high value indicate,the range of this, attribute for the,soil component. A
"representative"walue indicates the_"expected value of thI&attribute forthe component:.
For this soil property, only the representative value is used.
20

B. SC 30' N
35° 54'21'N
Custom Soil Resource Report
y Map — Available Water Capacity (Walgreens Leesville Strickland)
705010 705040 705070 705100 705130 705160
3 ;
v
� Map Sale: 1:1,220 if pritad on A portrait (8.5" x 11 ") std. TM
N 0 i 30 60 _ Meters
a
Fed
0 50 100 200 300
MaP pmfeton: web mwaftr comeranmwiatm: WGS84 Edge tics: urM zone 17N wGw
21
37 5f 30' N
g
O
n
�i
m
ri
0
N
rn
rnnrn
q�
N
n
35° 50'21'N

N
N
,•8cQ
a6
Its 0
ma
8-
_ 2
m
16 p3 m o v g [a -0 3,0, 2
as Scq Og 4 c0
a
Vi �
S. a+ °.��m ��
o, 0
tovm,
03— �'
IQ' 1 C YL.$SQ'�.
9 �'o Sc�
s m Z 0 1 2 c CA
n N D e
FL CD
Na�3
at
O 0
.0., m
m>3�'
yng8m �,
Imm"mm �
4-
0-110L m
O CIO
' �a
s, 0 g �
m 3 cm a
0m g
s m
m
m
�m
In
m
a
m
a
T
r
m
0
m
z,
v
I< I
CD
C
m
Is
5.
3
a
0
co,
O
a
z
In
0
X
z
m
n
9
O
3
o_
CD
N
O
C
f�
O
lD
O
0
N
oa
-
Z
Z,
,�
If
o
'a
°
A
_
0 a
g
o
o
om
v°
a
o
o
n
r
o o
m
00
p
m
N•
a
n
w
m
m
o Ii
p'
i>
o�
p, w
Co
D
O
m
O a
p
>
d
>
n
G d
a
a a
�
G
C)
7
1
1
7
Il
II
7 II I
m
.p+
O
O
O
O
O O
Q
to
Q
m
Q
AD
v
16 p3 m o v g [a -0 3,0, 2
as Scq Og 4 c0
a
Vi �
S. a+ °.��m ��
o, 0
tovm,
03— �'
IQ' 1 C YL.$SQ'�.
9 �'o Sc�
s m Z 0 1 2 c CA
n N D e
FL CD
Na�3
at
O 0
.0., m
m>3�'
yng8m �,
Imm"mm �
4-
0-110L m
O CIO
' �a
s, 0 g �
m 3 cm a
0m g
s m
m
m
�m
In
m
a
m
a
T
r
m
0
m
z,
v
I< I
CD
C
m
Is
5.
3
a
0
co,
O
a
z
In
0
X
z
m
n
9
O
3
o_
CD
N
O
C
f�
O
lD
O

Custom Soil Resource Reports
Table — Available Water Capacity. (Walgreens Leesville Strickland)
v p i' ° }� +'" - '"'a�^ �•� � �'C"+l:^� ",_, "' u:�+F°_'�.- u�.;1g�'4.eY�n:'3:"r Dt. S+as; sr_o�,....ti- .�..+�;rc:
v.- - Available,WaterY w- kb'CaiMy;.Norlh Cerolfne'(NC988
�J1
1wr+ r ... ti..
a� � r'-�
y
A�Q.%, t . tF= Li� .l�k.�i.�k {�LQx.LI'�.lu.�.tGif .'Yii.�f- Y %•�11a 1Q1tllLYi �'(Y:1_ :`•r 3����' 4. �i: Yt. L7�':' .% "�r�c'�a`.t.`'���c��1�.•.a.
lilM.:Zt•.�osi Y
ylki^� 1" P�/l"TI
Map unit symbol:
{` a"LiSrl��. —+'C
�dlap unit nam ®.
�17YfP.sZ: atYKf", (r
�Ratlng�(cr�meters'psr,�
2I :.. "i_
�zs'In AOI '�
���12��1�^ '�`SF
,eraeM of AOIi s
AgB ,
Applmg gravely sandy
0:13
2.2
- ' - -- 501%
loam, 2 to 6 percent
I
slopes
A982
Appling gravely.sandy
Os14 —
-i ' —_0.5
=- - - 10.6%
loam, 2 to Cpercent
slopes, moderately
eroded
AgC
AppMg gravelly sandy
0.13
1.2,
5• 2.6_.5°%
loam, 6 to 10 percent
L
slopes
Colfax sandy loam, 0 to,3,
006
0.5
10.6%
1CnA
percent slopes
f
_ _
Totals for Area of Interest _ - - - - -~ -- —
- - - -- 4.4
;� 100.096
Rating Options — Available Water Capacity (Walgreens Leesville
Strickland)
Units of Measure: centimeters per °centimeter
Aggregation Method: Dominant.Component
Component Percent, Cutoff: None Specified
Tie-break Rule: Higher
Interpret Nulls as,Zero: No
Layer Options (Horizon Aggregation Method): All Layers (Weighted Average)
Saturated Hydraulic Conductivity (Ksat) (Walgreens
Leesville Strickland)
Saturated hydraulic conductivity (Ksat) refers to the easwwith ^which pores in a •
saturated soil transmit water. The estimates are expressed in, terms of micrometers
per second. They are based on soil characteristics observed in the field, particularly
structure, porosity, and texture. Saturated hydraulic conductivity ls.considered in the
design of soil drainage systems and septic tank absorption fields.
For each,soil layer, this attribute is actually recorded as three,separate values in the
database. A low, value and a.high value'indicate the,range of this attribute for the soil
component. A "representative' value indicates the expected value -of this attribute for
the component. For this soil property, only the representative value is used.
The numeric Ksat values,have been grouped according to standard'Ksat ciass'ilmlts.
23

MR. 54' 30' N
35° 54'21"N
Custom Soil Resource Report
Map — Saturated Hydraulic Conductivity (Ksat) (Walgreens Leesville Strickland)
a �
� k
705010 705040 7050'70 705100 705130 705160
3 �
M Map She: 1:1,720 tF pnrlted on A port& (8,5'x 11) Sheet A
Nebars
N 0 15 30 60 90
- — Feet
0 50 100 200 300
Map projedion: Web Mercator Cana marinates: WGS84 Edge tl6: UrM Zoe 17N WGS84
24
35° 59 3R N
O
�i
np�
m
�i
i
Y
ii
O�
K
N
mnm
h1
M
p�
^1
35° 54'2l'N

N
cn
co a w m� g y °vc' mm o—o Lm m m
a ma CD
Ira (A
fa �� _ m �p A n�,nO m
r $ O w -.
CL, o bi, o� m °° �'� m, m m m -
t cID g` a m° r� g a ° � 8
c 0,. , m
� a o
_
3 v on ma c &�'
aa;D
m,�3 °c
z
06 0
CL
3 m $1 m $ a vm
d= c rA =rm�� c Qom v
3tOC=o 0 oeav �C S' "a�
°
' 1 J O'
03 U3
1
N
O
3
co
O
m
O
C
.'a
.D
O
a
c
m
3
W
�;
I
E
w
a
v
W
v n m
V 9
Z
C
v v
fV V
n Io
11
z v
v
n m
11
q
O
V
{A
,
r
co
^. (p
V
.0
,d
m
N
H
N
m
mm
a
O
�
N
R
O
A
OWi
mG O
A
(n
p,
A
-�.. D
�:
�y
N
i,
7n
O
a
i0
IN 7
ip Cf
P"
�Cn 7
to
7
ZF
A
O
A
I
o
n n
�� 4
o n
d
n
7
ca
pl/
H
_
1'
0
'r
_rn
m
c�
rt.
^
m
0
z
"
v
co a w m� g y °vc' mm o—o Lm m m
a ma CD
Ira (A
fa �� _ m �p A n�,nO m
r $ O w -.
CL, o bi, o� m °° �'� m, m m m -
t cID g` a m° r� g a ° � 8
c 0,. , m
� a o
_
3 v on ma c &�'
aa;D
m,�3 °c
z
06 0
CL
3 m $1 m $ a vm
d= c rA =rm�� c Qom v
3tOC=o 0 oeav �C S' "a�
°
' 1 J O'
03 U3
1
N
O
3
co
O
m
O
C
.'a
.D
O
a

Custom Soil Resource Report
Table— Saturated Hydraulic Conductivity (Ksat) (Walgreens
Leesville Strickland)
rr'F- iS•�.... f.�v. 'S�'>''NS: "3j' ;.°e_'4 =' ^x' rF �'uLI� �_1Sz,✓3SF - �,...._� Ii^�_:,Ye,Y,ox� —.�
- Saturated�Hydraullc Summery,by.Map Unit "_ — ;Wake County; North Caroline (NC183)' ;
__ ,Conduetivity,(Ksat}=
:
,�" .�'Y°r'- �._ Y Ti
;Map unit rymbol -�; ;
Y`•N•a
;!flap "untt nanm Y
�lu���
Gir: t.'.S. 1
y'i
,RatingT(mlcromsters
�° 'a; Nk° vyi�`�
-z.-`•r.�.—
�•G
Aaros In AOI
. •�
Percent of %IOIw
tf
�,{`', 3
�^t.
�
I _�+�. k'1" .
�:✓- �s•;r�
I1
.-s� -s —•f%- :,a;..��
.:�� x -.�•i .3.alat_.. hr...
"�i,c -� �6aC011d) � _r�
�w.�,. 2• - ..� 12x.
t: _ "i`i'i d -i.S. ��''" i .
`AgB
Applinggravelly.sandy
1111527 ' - -- -
- -- 21
- -50.,i
loam„ 2 to 6;percent
slopes
&62 - - - -
Appling gravelly sandy
9'9360 -
— l - 0.5
. 10.8%
loam, 2 to 6 percent
slopes, moderately
- — -
_eroded
- - -
AgC
�Appling gravelly sandy
111527
„ 1.2
28.5%
loam, 6 to 10,percent
-- - _
slopes
i
- -=
CnA
Colfax sandy loam; 0 to 3,
7.2445
J 0.5
��—
10.6%
percent slopes
Totals fotArea of Interest
4A
100.0%
Rating Options -- Saturated Hydraulic Conductivity (Ksat)
(Walgreens Leesville Strickland)
Units of Measure: micrometers,per second
Aggregation Method. Dominant Component
Component Percent Cutoff- None Specified
Tie -break Rule. Fastest
Interpret,Nulls as Zero: No
LayerOptions (Horfzon,Aggregatlon Method): All Layers (Weighted Average)
Soil Qualities and Features
Soil qualities are behavior and performance attributes that are not directly:measured,
but are Inferred from observations of dynamic conditibhs_and from soil properties.
Example soil qualities include natural drainage, and frost action. Soil features are
attributes that are not directly part of the,soil. Example soil features include' slope and
depth to restrictive layer. These features can greatly impact the use and management,
of the soil.
Drainage Class (Walgreens Leesville Strickland)
"Drainage class (natural)" refers to °the frequency and;duration ofwet °periods under
conditions'similar, to those under which °the soil formed. Aiterations�of the�water regime
by human activities, *either through drainage or irrigation, are not a consideration
26`

Custom-Sail Resource Report
unless they have significantly changed the morphology of the soil. Seven classes of
natural soil drainage are recognized - excessively drained, somewhat excessively
drained, well drained, moderately well drained, somewhat poorly drained, poorly
drained, and very poorly drained. These classes are defined in the "Soil Survey
Manual."
I
27

35° 54'30'N
35° S4' 21' N
Custom Soil Resource Report
Q Map— Drainage Class (Walgreens Leesville Strickland)
M T?
k k
705010 705/5090 705070 7051W 705130 705160
3 3
MMap Scale: 1:1,220 i prirted on A porbalt (8.5" x 11 ") sheet.
N 0 15 30 60 S
/V
0 50 100 200 300
Map proXftn: Web Merptm Comer c00rtinetes: WGS84 Edge tics: UTM Zone 17N WC-S84
28
R 35° 54 30 N
O�
ti
4
P
C
r
�i
P
pN�
T
�l
O
h
35° 54'21',

N
to
N D
m
Z ❑ 1 0 ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ 0002' ❑ N 0 2
a
a Z !n < 'O N n U, m t� Z N < v N a C D a -0 0
3 D 0 G m ° n$ m m N
if 4 0 O a Ila 10
(J d m K W �. 3 j O
Cl CD
0 m
m '
3
w n m �' n m a. m' n O D
m
a CD- n
a 3 m
� r
m
f
G)
bo o 0
a W ■■■ a o M o
R. N m m n
W
m _ w
m m °
CL
W m n
CL
ASS om �o c gDav� �� 33� �3m
m3.o �m 2 -y' c �m a� �ac c m 3 m
Zm� mm . c m mt�iw aNg �� 93 S' o.
�m 5 6.0 s3 m4.° m� °'Tm3 ° w
dO <11
n C T`+�� fnC y� CD g
eno 3 67 m 'n amm m ymv
aa°,g m m �3 vm �.m � �� =r 3 w w
° v m c m g
�� y g yd m8Dy� 3 a) g m -°-- 3 d 3
< c cr m
maw m �� Sri ova. a' momm 'O
d m cr m m (n m d `C 0 3
In m
a�3 ° v o� F m aM m m �`� w a g i i1
p o n c m m CL
I D c
D O
3
3 2r I D v
v m qmy m 3 N U) CA f�w�„ � ° � � pm 1 m° @ 0) 3 Q
0 C7 O. O w C] m. O fi m Z
3 m N rr
C w InD CL o�W og mNOc
2 gs.g
to A O R tO m 8
C
N
O
3
cn
O
lD
to
O
c
A�
N
77
(D

Custom Soil Resource Report
Table — Drainage Class (Walgreens Leesville Strickland)
9, --�'�"': :'i+`' •,.` Y
Drainage
3.Jp, ��.�� -' r'1NF- ..`T1��rsQ'
Class— Summla>r7► MaPlllnik yy,ke'CouMyj NcrthlCerollna,(NC189)•
_"i+.'lx+rar_;rL%: nF...4 ?..3w �.rt :tw,s ri-a:.: YSa4u; i:,} .,..:5�"met..___�..t.rrev.:�,�
eymbolt� t
9M�lMap�un elsira;,�
=� `-v'�'7—'-
°' Rath ' �'1
��C- "�+'4�'S ?{,T"�
A01 'Percent
�—:,, Y'•:an'w•;•'�yA�c •�
of A01+
;Mapunit
®�
x ,,Aaes',In
Ag8 - - �- - -
Appling gravelly -sandy v
well drained
22''
50.1 %
'loam, 2to 6'percent
slopes
AgB2
Appling gravelly sandy
Well drained
loam, 210 6 percent
slopes, moderately
- - -
eroded
_
_
AgC
Appling gravelly sandy
Well drained
1.2T
28.596
loam, 6 to 10'percent
slopes
CnA
Colfax sandy loam, 0 to 3,
Somewhat'poody drained i
0.5
10.6%
percent,slopes
Totals for Area of Interest -
— - 4A
100.0%
Rating Options— Drainage Class (Walgreens Leesville Strickland)
Aggregation Method: Dominant Condition
Component ;Percent Cutoff, 'None Specified
716-break Rule: Higher
Hydrologic Soil Group (Walgreens Leesville Strickland)
Hydrologic soil'groups are based on, estimates of runoff potential. Soils arwassigned
to one of four groups according to the rate of water infiltration,when,the soils are'not
protected by vegetation, are thoroughly wet, and receive precipitation from long -
duration storms.
The'soils in the.United States are assigned to four groups,(A. B. C,,,and D)znd,three
dual classes (A/D, B /D, and C /D). The groups ,are defined as follows:
Group A. Soils having a high infiltration rate (love runoff potential) when thoroughly
wet. These consist mainly ofdeep, well drained to excessively,drained,sands or
gravelly sands. These soils have a high rate of'water transmission.
Group,B. Soils,having a moderate.infiltration rate when thoroughly wet. These consist
chiefly of moderately deep or deep, moderately well drained or well drained soils that
have moderately fine texture to moderately coarse texture. These soils have a
moderate rate of water transmission.
Group'C. Soils having a,sl`ow infiltration rate,when'thoroughly wet. These consist
chiefly of soils having a layer that impedes the downward movement of -water or soils
30

Custom, Soil,Resource Report
of moderately fineuxture or fine texture. These soils have a slow -rate of water
transmission.
Group D.,Soils having a very slow`infiitration rate (high runoff potential)when
thoroughly wet. These,consist chiefly of clays that have a high shrink -swell potential,
soils that'have a,high water table, soils that,have a,claypan or clay layer at,or near the
surface, and'solls that are shallow over nearly impervious material. These soils have
a very-slow rate of water transmission.
If a soil,is,assigned We dual,hydrologic,group (A/D „B /D,=or1C /D), the first letter is for
drained areas and the second is for undrained areas. Only the soils tfiat'in their natural
condition are in group D are assigned to dual classes.
31
I
a

35' 59 30' N
35' 54 21'N
Custom Soil Resource Report
Map — Hydrologic Soil Group (Walgreens Leesville Strickland)
705010 705040 705070 705100 705130 705160
3 3
Map Scale: 1:1,]20 If pdrAed on A porhat (8.5" x 11 ") 9'xEt o
_ —�fift
N 0 15 30 60 90
A0 50 100 200 300
Flap VD)"w: Web Mai cM3i C rw coordinates: VVGS84 Edge bm: UTM Zone 17N WGSB4
32
35° 54'30'N
Ri
s
35' 54' 21' N

CA)
CA)
i
3 g �.m ° CO) c N gam. $ �o� m n�c 3 v oa 3 m
s .go �g m— Zs' <y $ av $QC $m wmcm m m
mt3.o y c3 m � c my s� ° 9�, aC'n �'� g ° 3 '
sQ a m �v
0 0 m m , m
CD
a Sf�
�.� �,
N o so .°1. m 01 "v`, m 3
0 �� `m' ° D y r�
SL
cr
go
FL
CL
g g N cL
m" m CL CL w
OW
a N �; ar
o m o a cr
3 ° m
C
.N►
O
CA
O
m
N
O
C
O
b
D )
c
D
'T W D m
a
�Z p A
a
A W
a
m D `m
2 p
A"
O N D U
CA
�
o
W
a
° o
a
o
g
Q
rr
m
too
m
�
CD
i
3 g �.m ° CO) c N gam. $ �o� m n�c 3 v oa 3 m
s .go �g m— Zs' <y $ av $QC $m wmcm m m
mt3.o y c3 m � c my s� ° 9�, aC'n �'� g ° 3 '
sQ a m �v
0 0 m m , m
CD
a Sf�
�.� �,
N o so .°1. m 01 "v`, m 3
0 �� `m' ° D y r�
SL
cr
go
FL
CL
g g N cL
m" m CL CL w
OW
a N �; ar
o m o a cr
3 ° m
C
.N►
O
CA
O
m
N
O
C
O

Custom Soil Resource Report
Table — Hydrologic Soil Group,(Walgreens Leesville Strickland)
Ir`3`- 'l:' -`< �;t1'm-T,
=., :. � : �;
•__�i'�. �'.�c� ^r.. '.-rw'Y^.— ••, °y�''l�"- •'Y:r�= jai `.,I'n1.- •- `�<tr:.�vir`�'�".4: '7�:- i 'cr`�01Ta'mv�r
{Gniup= Map Untt`°`°• WakeCounty
•�,��` —,a- --
�•• - , •
i°- ,< �HydriologleSoN
..tiv��iL "ice +y`.. ... "-1 Y•:
r�Sumniarydbji ,�NoNiCarollna`f;NC188)�'
k > �-F.°'t�,,'t..: 7 .�a "'i�w'h71�13. XT „7 ..Y'..11J �� ;.. S,^.�"b..Y 51., r +,Jf!t^JL t.•+ '3t
, `„� ,
•: ^`�c.�.J,',* ::+1J...sr�._L k
- aw,Ti»'Y"•^- mT -=a'L -
;MapunB symbol:�dAapwnk
l s0_ �Y
.
��- ��.'Rv1�`
i
t a51• -A-c.. v.��
''�` -R"`q �ic-
�.If.ik i4, -.rnaa w "�t�
r.� ��. -.c.�
�:32c: i
"_TA.a fl. s �..
.^3aW ��n '++- ��a�'.•.
- _— —�=
AgB
AppOng gravelly sandy I
g,_
2.2
,— - -- = 501 %,
loam, 2 to 6 percent
slopes
AgB2
Applmg grav ny sandy ri
B - -
�- - 0.5
P
- - 1 10:8 %,
loam,,2 to)6;percent
slopes; moderately
- _
eroded
- •
-
—�
—
AgC
Appling gravelly sandy
B
�- 1.2
26.5%
loam, 6 to10,percent,'
-
- - -
CM
Colrax sandy loam, 0 to 3
C!D
0.5
10.6%
percent slopes
_
Totals for Area of Interest
4.4
100.0%
Rating Options — Hydrologic -Soil Group (Walgreens Leesville
Strickland)
Aggregation Method., Dominant Condition
Aggregation is the process by which a set of component attribute values is reduced
to a single value,that represents the map.unit as,a whole.
A map unifIs•typically composed of one or more "components". A component is either
some type of soil or some nonsoil entity, e.g., rock outcrop. For the attribute,being
aggregated, the first step of the aggregation process is to derive one attribute value
for each of a map unit's components. From this set of component:attributes, the next
step ofthe aggregation process derivesaa.single value that represents the map unit
as�a whole. Once a single value for each map unit is derived, a thematic map for soil
map units can be rendered. Aggregation must be done because, on any soil map, map
units are,delineated but components are not.
For each of a map unit's components, a corresponding'percent composition is
recorded. A percent composition of 60 indicates,that the corresponding component
typically makes up approximately 60% ofthe map unit: Percent composition is a critical
factor,in some, but,not,all,,aggregation methods.
The aggregation method "Dominant Condition" first groups like attribute values for the
components in a map unit. For each group, percent composition is set to the.sum of
the percent composition of all components participating,in'that,group. These groups
nowirepresent, "conditions" rather than components. The attribute value,associated
with the group with the highest•cumulative percent composition is returned. If more
than one group shares the highest cumulative percentcomposidon;,the corresponding
"tie -break" rule determines which value should be returned. The "tie -break" rule
indicates,whether the lower or higher group value should be retumed,in,the case,of a
percent °composition tie..The result returned bythis aggregation method represents
the dominant condition throughout,the map unit only when no tie has occurred.
Kn

Custom Soil Resource Report
Component Percent Cutoff..• None Specified
Components whose percent composition is beiow'the cutoff- ,value-will not,be
considered. If no cutoff'value is specified, all components in the database.will be,
considered. The data for some contrasting soils of minor extent may not be in the
database, and therefore are not.considered.
Tie -break Rule: `Higher
The tie -break rule indicates which value should be selected from a set of multiple
candidate values, or which value should be selected in the event °of a percent
composition tie.
Water Features
Water Features include ponding frequency, flooding frequency, and depth to water,
table.
Depth to Water Table (Walgreens Leesville Strickland)
"Water table" refers to,a saturated zone in the,soil. It, occurs dunng specified months.
Estimates of the upper limit are based mainly on observations of the water table;at
selected sites and on evidence of a saturated zone, namely grayish colors
(redoximorphic features) in the soil. A saturated zone that lasts for less than a month
'is not considered a water table.
k
This attribute is actually recorded as three separate values in the database. A low
value and a.high value indicate =the range of this attribute for the soil component.,A
"representative" value indicates the expected value of this attribute for;the component.
'For this soil property, only the representativeavalue is used.
35

-L. I 1 k) c� �/r7• r �F_7
AqC
AqB
tea-' • 4 r•.� $r,4- )/- � !
}_
S'
i AqC
F .
c 4,
f-

w
> _ p (p�
r') p O O O N N r a - O 1 {��, N 9 w
N O O N a ��ryp O pp p N O m a
O 41 O Ei 9),
ar '�• O �• O
°o o � S -
m
m �'' Z z
13
ar
m CL ,2 a
n CL o ° m
CL
rL
o• N d ffi a
CVg -g
cor m 3lc I m
rA
° 3 3 y�
ccn) < of g 4
3 m v m R n.'i
Cal o �. m i
CL CD
m
CD
J
� pp �-
m IN
G
0
ro
0
m
0

Custom Soil RescurceReport
Table—Depth to Wider Table (Walgreens Leesville Strickland)
OM �;wfiwi
tra
uUng Nc,
T-I N
P r" .RC
AgB
'Appong gravelly,sandy
;,200,
2.2
loam, 2 to 8 percent
slopes
AgB2
Appling ndy
>200
0.5
1 0.8%
-,w
loam, 2,to 6 percent
slopes, moderately
eroded
4pplingg"Iy-sandy
>200
1.2
28:5%,
loam, StolOpercent
CnA -J
&oft,"i;iy'fOiMiI0`to 3�,
31
0.61,
10.6%
percent slopes
100.0%
w

Custom Soil Resource Report
Rating Optlons —Depth to Water Table (Walgreens Leesville
,Strickland)
Units of Measure: centimeters
Aggregation Method: Dominant Component
Component,Percent Cutoff; None, Specified
Tie -break Rule: Lower
Interpret'Nulls as Zero: No
Beginning, Month: January
Ending Month: December
Flooding Frequency Class (Wlalgreelns Leesville
Strickland)
Flooding is the temporary inundation of an area caused by overflowing streams, by
runoff from adjacent slopes, or by tides. Water standing for short pedoftafter rainfall,
or snowmelt is not,considered flooding, and water standing in swamps and marshes
is considered ponding rather than flooding.
Frequency i&expressed as none, very rare, rare, occasional, frequent, and very
frequent.
' "None" means that floodingis not,probable. The chance of flooding is nearly 0 percent
in any year Flooding occurs less than once in 500 years.
"Very rare" means that flooding is very unlikely but possible under extremely unusual
weather conditions: The chancedof flooding is lessAhan, l percent In any year
"Rare" means that floodingris unlikely but possible underunusual weather conditions:
The chance of flooding is 1 to 5 percent in any year.
"Occasional" means that flooding occurs infrequently under normal weather
conditions. The chance of flooding is 5 to 50 percent in any year.
"Frequent" means, that flooding is likely to,occur ofte-munder normal weather
conditions. The chance of flooding�is more than 50 percent in any year but is less than
50 percent in all months in any year.
"Very frequent" means that flooding is likely to occur very often under normal weather
conditions. The chance of flooding is more than 50 percent in all months of,any year.
39

35° 54'3(r N
35° 54 21' N
Custom Soil Resource Report
Map— Flooding Frequency Class (Walgreens Leesville Strickland)
k k
7C5010 705040 705070 705100 705130 705160
3 ;
Map Scale: 1:1,220 if prYthed on R porhait (8.5" x 11 ") sheet
�e NN 0 15 30 60 90
/V
0 50 100 200 zet
Map prgedjon: Web Mermtm Canter coordinates: Vvr,%4 Edge tics: UTM Zone 17N WCLq A
40
35° 54'30" N
n
�i
0
n
�i
n
�i
35. 5921"N

< T 0 z to z
, m 9 1 m 0) (D Z. -n -Z (Pi
2 11 < a
V tN
m
(D
0
CD (D j
m
0 C 7 0 a CD CD (0 (D;
DD
>
E > 0) M
t7
CP.
m
pr
v 13 Z
0 CCO z
CL
P. Cn
am
CD
a S I ,
S. 0 go CaD rq
0) 0 CD c
fx
'CD '2- CO
r1c r- ff :CD
vino a 15 CD
w CD— w :3
a Z;
co 0 Pr
R 3Z
I I !
'.or 3 C z
Ep
I CL
co AM C cr =
M.9 M
3 S,Wo g , A CL
9 1
Z.
'
—CL, CL
k 'a
>
0
W 2 A)
"l CD COL i
3 94, CD ID 3 co Z,
3-9., L. M, 3 Ma
o o
CL co
Ix o—
!r
co
Ll
O
C/)
Ul
0
c
19
fD

I �
. Custom Soil Resource Report
Table—flooding, Frequency Class (Walgreens Leesville
Strickland)
Unit = OU n
A4B
Appling gravelly sandy,
None
2.2+
50.1%
loam, 2 to 6percent
slopes
AgB2
Applinqgravelly s&Wy
None
'0.5'
10.8%
loam, 2 to 6 percent
slopes, moderately
eroded
Agc-
Appling gravelly sandy
Nbne
-1.2
- 28.5 %,
loam, 6 to 10 percent
slopes
jCrLA
QD6xsan-dy loam; O to &
None
0:5
10.6%,
percent,slopes J-
Totals -ior7kea of In
4.4
100
Rating Options,—Flooding Frequency Class (Walgreens Leesville
Strickland)
Aggregation Method: Dominant Coridition
Component Percent-Cutbffi 'None 9pediti6d,
Tie-break Rule: More Frequent
Beginning Month: January
`Ending Month: December
42
H

References
American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO)..2004.
Standard specifications for transportation materials'and methods of sampling and
testing. 24th edition..
American, Society for Testing�and Materials (ASTM). 2005. Standa�d'classification of
sods for engineering purposes. ASTM Standard b2487 -00.,
Cowardih, L.M., V. Carter, F.C. Golet, and E.T. LaRoe. 1979. Classification of
wetlands and deep -water habitats of the United States. U.S. FishTand Wildlife,Service
FWS /OBS- 79/31.
Federal Register. ,July 13, 1994. Changes, in hydric soils of the United States.
Federal Register. September 18, 2002. Hydric soils of the United States.
Hurt, G.W.,'and L.M. Vasilas, editors. Version 6.0, 2006. Field indicators of hydric soils
in the. United States.
National, Research Council. 1995. Wetlands: Characteristics,and boundaries.
Soil Survey Division Staff. 1993. Soil survey,manual. Soil Conservation Service_ U.S_ .
Department of Agriculture Handbook 18. http: / /soils.usda.gov/
Soil Survey Staff. 1999. Soil'taxonomy: A basic system of,soil classification,for making
and interpreting,soil surveys. 2nd edition. Natural Resources +Conservation Service,
U.S. Department of Agriculture Handbook 436. http: / /soils.usda.gov/
Sod Survey Staff: 2006: Keys to soil taxonomy. 10th edition. U.S. Department of
Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service. http: / /soils.usda.gov/
Tiner, R.W., Jr. 1985. Wetlands of Delaware. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and
Delaware Department of Natural Resources,and Environmental Control, Wetlands
Section.
United States Army Corps of Engineers, Environmental Laboratory. 1987. Corps of
Engineers'wetiands delineation manual. Waterways Experiment Station Technical
Report Y -87 -1.
United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation_ Service.
National forestry manual. http: / /soils.usda.gov/
United States Department,of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service.
National range and pasture handbook. http: //www.glti.nres.usda:gov/
United States Department,of,Agriculture, Natural Resources, Conservation Service.
National soil -survey handbook, title 430 -VI. http: / /soils.usda gov/
United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service.
2006. Land resource regions and major land resource areas of the United States, the
Caribbean, and the Pacific Basin.'U.S. Department of Agriculture Handbook 296.
http: / /soils.usda.gov/
43

Custom Soil Resource Report,
United States Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service. 1961. Land
capability classification. U.S: Department of Agriculture Handbook210.
a
44
I

1 �
4e Miscellaneous Maps /Reports
4.2 FEMt Flood Insurance Rate Map

,
! }l
tai!
i f jib! ii�;t r
4�1r1'
]=]l�s�j�
i
,
C
� � v
of
Di ion' ail �fi�dt�
:! ]
s ,
illy
,# ,1111,
} i li, ,
ti
i¢ 9,sats
'
slit ,; 11"1
ii
i} fill:
:
r
!x rt ��,� lit #i•]
!
1 �E•� i��, 11,!1,1,
�Y] E ,1ri�F� !ff]ffi
ljEf i JIM
?
0111 U0,, 11,1,
MiNN `+!
����iie�r.(♦ E'er c