20140944 Ver 1_401 Application_20140814

CAROLINA
ECOSYSTEMS, INC.
August 28, 2014
Mr. John Thomas
Raleigh Regulatory Field Office
US Army Corps of Engineers
3331 Heritage Trade Drive, Suite 105
Wake Forest, North Carolina 27587
2 0 1 4 0 9 4 4
3040 NC 42 West, Clayton NC 27520
PAID P:919- 606 -1065 — F:919 -585 -5570
�C [NOW r=-3
B p
a
AUG 2 S 2014
NR - VVATM OUALITY
pqE § 8tornft Amt
RE: Pre - Construction Notification: Nationwide Permit 12 & General Certification No. 3884
South Fork Basin Improvements
Forsyth County, North Carolina
Dear Mr. Thomas;
Carolina Ecosystems, Inc. (CEI), in conjunction with Black & Veatch and Hazen & Sawyer, has
prepared the attached Pre - Construction Notification for the Winston- Salem/Forsyth City- County
Utilities Commission (CCUC). Enclosed is an application for a Section 404 Nationwide Permit
12 and a Section 401 Water Quality Certification No. 3884.
The CCUC is planning sewer infrastructure improvements in the South Fork and Muddy Creek
basins in southern Winston -Salem (Figure 1). The purpose of this project is to address critical
needs of the Muddy Creek basin and South Fork basin collection system identified through the
CCUC wastewater master planning process. The project is proposed to manage wet weather
flow, address predicted 2041 growth in the service area, and improve water quality through the
reduction of sanitary sewer overflows (SSO's).
The South Fork basin service area is approximately 68 square miles and encompasses the
southeastern portion of Forsyth County. The service area includes the City of Winston - Salem,
Forsyth County and the Town of Kernersville. The Muddy Creek basin is approximately 130
square miles and includes the western and northern portions of the CCUC wastewater service
area. The proposed project consists of the construction of the Muddy Creek Consolidated
Influent Pump Station (MCCIPS), Muddy Creek WWTP Influent Transfer Force Main
(MCTFM), improvements to the South Fork Interceptor (SFI), Elledge WWTP improvements,
and expansion of the Kerners Mill Pump Station and force main. These project components are
shown in Figure 1. Additional segments of the SFI (shown in gray on Figure 1) were initially
studied and included in the wetland delineation for this project, but are currently not anticipated
to be designed or constructed in the next 5 years.
Impacts to Waters of the U.S. are not anticipated to occur during construction of the Elledge
WWTP improvements or the expansion of the Kerners Mill Pump Station and force main.
Therefore, these projects are shown on Figure 1 and included here for reference as they are a
portion of the overall South Fork basin improvements but do not require 404/401 permits. As we
discussed, the project components will be constructed under separate contracts, and the SFI
improvements are able to function as an independent project without the construction of the
MCCIPS and force main. The proposed construction schedule as of August 2014 is as follows.

Mr John Thomas
August 28, 2014
South Fork Improvements Program Construction Schedule
Page 2 of 3
Project
Advertise
NTP
Substantial
Completion
Final
Completion
MC CIPS
9/15/2014
11/25/2014
10/25/2016
1/29/2017
Elledge WWTP Day Tanks
1/15/2015
3/23/2015
5/23/2016
7/25/2016
Elledge WWTP Aeration System
2/15/2015
4/23/2015
5/23/2016
7/25/2016
SFI Contract Phase 1
11/10/2014
1/30/2015
6/7/2016
8/8/2016
MC TFM
2/16/2015
5/1/2015
6/6/2016
8/4/2016
SFI Contract Phase 2
4/13/2015
7/3/2015
6/6/2016
7/7/2016
Kerners Mill Force Main
11/16/2015
1/29/2016
6/2/2016
8/2/2016
Kerners Mill Pump Station
6/6/2015
1 9/1/2016
1 8/26/2017
1 6/26/2017
Multiple alterations to this project were thoroughly evaluated, along with their environmental
effects, and documented in the July 2013 "Environmental Assessment for the Muddy Creek
Consolidated Influent Pump Station and Collection System Improvements " A Finding of No
Significant Impact for this project was issued on November 22, 2013; and is attached
The proposed MCCIPS and force main will transfer up to 30 MGD of excess wastewater from
the Muddy Creek Wastewater Treatment Plant (WWTP) to the Elledge WWTP and will be
routed parallel to three existing centrate /biosolids transfer lines between the two WWTPs The
transfer force main will be approximately 24,300 feet of 30 -inch diameter pipe
The SFI improvements include replacement or parallel gravity sewer lines for multiple segments
including the SFI, Overdale Road Outfall, and Muddy Creek WWTP Outfall (all discussed as
SFI to avoid confusion)
Upgrades to the South Fork Interceptor include, replacement of 24,290 feet with 60 -inch
diameter pipe, addition of 6,600 feet of 42 -inch diameter pipe, and re- routing of a section of pipe
using 800 feet of 18 -inch diameter pipe and 1,500 feet of 15 -inch diameter pipe The table
below provides a more detailed breakdown of the SFI improvements,
South Fork Interceptor Improvements
South Fork
Interceptor
14,100 feet of 60 -inch DIP or FRP replacing existing 36 -inch diameter RCP
(SF -G -01)
interceptor
South Fork
Interceptor
6,600 feet of 42 -inch DIP, FRP or PVC replacing 12 -inch RCP sewer and
(SF -G -02)
paralleling 36 -inch diameter'interceptor
Overdale Rd
800 feet of 18 -inch VCP replacing existing 12 -inch diameter RCP interceptor
Outfall (SF -G -05)
1,500 feet of 15 -inch VCP replacing existing 12 -inch diameter RCP
interceptor
Muddy Creek
WWTP Outfall
10,190 feet of 60 -inch DIP or FRP sewer replacing 36`inch diameter existing
(SF -G -06)
RCP interceptor

Mr John Thomas Page 3 of 3
August 28, 2014
Total impacts to waters of the U S are 1015 linear feet of temporary stream impacts, 144 linear
feet of permanent stream impacts, and 1 02 acres of wetland impacts Permanent wetland
`impacts of 0 24 acres will result from forested wetlands located within a 15 foot maintenance
corridor, along with fill associated with the MCCIPS improvements at the Muddy Creek WWTP
Temporary wetland impacts of 0.78 acres will result from clearing of the construction corridor
and clearing, excavation, and maintenance of non - forested wetlands within current utility
maintenance corridor All disturbed wetland areas will be returned to pre - construction
elevations Additional details of each impact are provided in the PCN, Impact tables; and Impact
sheets
The preceding information, along with the enclosed Project Information sheet, Pre - Construction
Notification, stream and wetland impact tables, Vicinity map, USGS map, Impact Locations
map, individual impact site maps, and engineering plans are being submitted for your review of
this project A copy of this application is also being provided to the NC Division of Water
Resources for their review and issuance of GC 3884
If you have any questions or need additional information please contact me at your earliest
convenience at (919) 606 -1065 or phil may @carolmaeco corn
Sincerely,
Carolina Ecosystems, Inc.
Philip May
Senior Environmental Scientist
Cc Karen Higgins, NC DWR — 401 & Buffer Permitting Unit
Ron Hargrove, Utilities Director, City of Winston -Salem
Terry Cornett, P E., Black & Veatch
Mary Sadler, P E, Hazen & Sawyer, Inc
Attachments
Project Information Sheet
Pre - Construction Notification Form
NCEEP Acceptance Latter
Finding of No Significant Impact
City of Winston Salem Floodplain Development Permit
NCDENR Stormwater Permit
Stream Impact Summary Table
Wetland Impact Summary Table
Figure 1 Project Vicinity
Figure 2 USGS
Figure 3 Impact Locations
Figure 4 Impact Sites
Engineering Plans

Project Information Sheet
3040 NC 42 West, Clayton, NC 27520
P 919- 606 -1065 — F 919 -585 -5570
Date: 8/28%14
Project Name South Fork Basin Improvements
Name of Property Owner /Applicant Winston -Salem City- County Utilities Commission
Consultant/Agent Carolina Ecosystems, Inc
Related /Previous Action IDs None
Site Address N/A
Subdivision Name (if applicable) N/A
City Winston- Salem, NC
County Forsyth County
Lat 36 0301 Long -80 2247
USGS Quadrangle(s) Welcome, Winston -Salem East, Winston -Salem West
River Basin(s) Yadkin
8 -Digit HUC(s) 03040101
Nearest Stream(s) South Fork Muddy Creek, Muddy Creek, and Salem Creek
Directions to Site From Wake Forest take 1 -40/85 ,west to exit 195 for NC 109/ Thomasville Road
Turn left on Thomasville Road
Requested Action
❑ Pre - application Request
❑ Jurisdictional Determination Request ❑ Final ❑ Preliminary
® Permit Application ® Nationwide 12
❑ General
❑ Individual

of wAr�R
7 =i
�r
Office Use Only
Corps action ID no
DWQ project no
Form Version 1 3 Dec 10 2008
Page 1 of 12
PCN Form — Version 1 3 December 10, 2008 Version
Pre - Construction Notification PCN) Form
A. Applicant Information
1
Processing
1a
Type(s) of approval sought from the
Corps
®Section 404 Permit El Section 10 Permit
1b Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number 12 or General Permit (GP) number
1 c
Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps?
® Yes
❑ No
1d
Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply)
® 401 Water Quality Certification — Regular ❑ Non -404 Jurisdictional General Permit
❑ 401 Water Quality Certification — Express ❑ Riparian Buffer Authorization
le
Is this notification solely for the record
because written approval is not required?
For the record only for DWQ 401
Certification
❑ Yes ®No
For the record only for Corps Permit
❑ Yes ®No
1f
Is payment into a,mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for mitigation
of iinpacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank, or in 'lieu
fee program
® Yes
❑ No
1g
Is the protect located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties If yes, answer 1h
below
❑ Yes
® No
1h
Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)?
❑ Yes
® No
2
Project Information
2a
Name of project
South Fork Basin Improvements
2b
County
Forsyth County
2c
Nearest municipality / town
Winston -Salem
2d
Subdivision name
N/A
2e
NCDOT only, T I P or state
project no
N/A
3
Owner Information
3a
Name(s) on Recorded Deed
Winston -Salem City -County Utilities Commission (CCUC)
3b
Deed Book and Page No
Easement -to be acquired by CCUC
3c
Responsible Party (for LLC if
applicable)
Ron Hargrove, Utilities Director
3d
Street address
101 North Main Street
3e
City, state, zip
Winston - Salem, NC, 27101
3f
Telephone no
336 - 747 -7312
3g
Fax no
3h
r
Email address
ronh @cityofws org
Page 1 of 12
PCN Form — Version 1 3 December 10, 2008 Version

4
Applicant Information (if different from owner)
4a
Applicant is
® Agent ❑ Other, specify
4b
Name
Kent Lackey
4c
Business name
(if applicable)
Black & Veatch
4d
Street address
11000 Regency Parkway, Suite 410
4e
City, state, zip
Cary, NC, 27518
4f
Telephone no
336- 202 -5043
4g
Fax no
4h
Email address
lackeyka @bv com
5
Agent/Consultant Information (if applicable)
5a
Name
Phil May
5b
Business name
(if applicable)
Carolina Ecosystems Inc
5c
Street address
3040 NC Hwy 42 West
5d
City, state, zip
Clayton, NC 27520
5e
Telephone no
(919) 606 -1065
5f
Fax no
(919)- 585 -5570
5g
Email address
phd may @carolinaeco com
Page 2 of 12
PCN Form — Version 1 3 December 10, 2008 Version

B Project Information and Prior Project History
1 Property Identification
1a Property identification no (tax PIN or parcel ID)
Varies - multiple parcels - see plan sheets
1 b Site coordinates (in decimal degrees)
Latitude 36 0301 Longitude - 80 2247
(DD DDDDDD) ( -DD DDDDDD)
1c Property size
103 acres
2 Surface Waters
2a Name of nearest,body of water (stream, river, etc ) to
South Fork Muddy Creek, Salem Creek (Middle Fork
proposed project
Muddy Creek), and Muddy Creek
2b Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water
C
2c River basin
Yadkin
3 Project Description
3a Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this
application
Land use within and adjacent to the proposed interceptor and force main is primarily forest land, existing sewer right -of-
way, agriculture, and residential properties The surrounding area is mostly residential development, agriculture, and
forest land
3b List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property
1 1 acres within the proposed easements
3c List the total estimated linear feet of all,existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property
1454 linear feet within the proposed easements
3d Explain the purpose of the proposed project
The purpose of this project is to address critical needs of the Muddy Creek basin and South Fork basin collection system
identified in the City /County Utility Commission (CCUC) wastewater masterplanning process The components of,this
project will ensure that CCUC maintains adequate capacity to serve the anticipated wastewater demand of the South
Fork and Muddy Creek basins and reduce the probability of sanitary sewer overflow events
3e Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be -used
The MCC IPS will be constructed primarily on already disturbed WWTP areas The Muddy Creek force main, will be
constructed along existing centrate /biosolids transfer lines easements, with minimal additional disturbance The SFI
improvements will consist of multiple replacement or parallel lines as described in the attached cover letter Construction
will be accomplished using standard equipment including, but not limited to, excavators, backhoes, and dump trucks
Nationwide Permit 12 conditions will be met within the wetlands Due to the size and depth of the lines, presence of other
utilities, and the need to retain existing service during construction, the proposed construction corridor width for the SFI
varies from 50 to 60 feet Also permanent stream crossings consisting of 20 feet of the HDPE Pipe will be installed at 7
locations where bank,slopes require permanent access to prevent bank destabilization and stream sedimentation from
maintenance equipment The construction corridor for the Muddy Creek force main will be limited to 40 feet at all impact
locations
4 Jurisdictional Determinations
4a Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the
Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property /
®Yes E:1 No El Unknown
project (including all prior phases) in the pasty
Comments Preliminary JD requested, June 2013
4b If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination, what type
❑ Preliminary ❑ Final
of determination was made?
4c If yes, who delineated the,junsdictional areas?
Agency /Consultant Company Carolina Ecosystems Inc
Name (if known) Phil May, Brian Smith, and James Pflaum
Other
4d If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation
Field verification performed on 11/22/2013 PJD to be issued with this NWP
Page 3 of 12
PCN Form — Version 1 3 December 10, 2008 Version

5
Project History
5a
Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for
❑ Yes ® No ❑ Unknown
this project (including all prior phases) in the past?
5b
If yes, explain in detail according to "help file" instructions
6
Future Project Plans
6a
Is this a phased project?
® Yes ❑ No
6b
If yes, explain
The proposed project consists of the construction of the Muddy Creek Consolidated Influent Pump Station, Muddy Creek
WWTP Influent Transfer Force Main, and improvements to the South Fork Interceptor Portions of the SFI improvements
will not be constructed for more than 5 years These' projects are shown in grey in Figure 1, and are not included in the
PCN
Page 4 of 12
PCN Form — Version 1 3 December 10, 2008 Version

C Proposed Impacts Inventory
1 Impacts Summary
la Which sections were completed below for your project (check all that apply)
® Wetlands ® Streams - tributaries ❑ Buffers
❑ open Waters ❑ Pond Construction
2 Wetland Impacts
If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted
2a
2b
2c
2d
2e
2f
Wetland impact
Type of jurisdiction
number —
Type of impact
Type of wetland
Forested
(Corps - 404, 10
Area of impact
Permanent (P) or
(if known)
DWQ — non -404, other)
(acres)
Temporary
W1 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
W2 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
W3 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
W4 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
W5 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
W6 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
29. Total wetland impacts
1 02
2h_ Comments See attached table
3 Stream Impacts
If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this
question for all stream sites impacted
3a
3b
3c
3d
3e
3f
3g
Stream impact
Type of impact
Stream name
Perennial
Type of jurisdiction
Average
Impact
number -
(PER) or
(Corps - 404, 10
stream
length
Permanent (P) or
intermittent
DWQ — non -404,
width
(linear
Temporary (T)
(INT)?
other)
(feet)
feet)
E:1 PER
❑ Corps
S1 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ INT
❑ DWQ
S2 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ PER
❑ Corps
❑ INT
❑ DWQ
❑ PER
❑ Corps
S3 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ INT
❑ DWQ
S4 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ PER
❑ Corps
❑ INT
❑ DWQ
❑ PER
❑ Corps
S5 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ INT
❑ DWQ
❑ PER
❑ Corps
S6 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ INT
❑ DWQ
3h Total stream and tributary impacts
1159
31 Comments See attached table
Page 5 of 12
PCN Form — Version 1 3 December 10, 2008 Version

4 Open Water Impacts
If there,are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of
the U S then individually list all open water impacts below
4a
4b
4c
4d
4e
Open water
Name of waterbody
impact number–
(if applicable)
Type of impact
Waterbody type
Area of impact (acres)
Permanent (P) or
T
—Temporary
01 ❑P ❑T
02 ❑P ❑T
03 ❑P ❑T
04 ❑P ❑T
4E Total open water impacts
00
4g Comments
5 Pond or Lake Construction
If Pond or lake construction proposed, the complete the,chart below
5a
5b
5c
5d
5e
Wetland Impacts (acres)
Stream Impacts (feet)
Upland
Pond ID
Proposed use or purpose
(acres)
number
of pond
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
Flooded
P1
P2
5L Total
5g Comments
5h Is,a dam high hazard permit required
❑ Yes ❑ No If yes, permit ID no
51 Expected pond surface area (acres)
51 Size of pond watershed (acres)
5k Method of construction
6 Buffer Impacts (for DWQ)
If prolect�wdl impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below If yes, then individually list all buffer impacts
below If any impacts require mitigation, then you MUST fill out Section D of this form
6a
❑ Neuse El Tar-Pamlico El Other
Project is in which protected basin?
❑ Catawba ❑Randleman
6b
6c
6d
6e
6f
6g
Buffer impact
number–
Reason
Buffer
Zone 1 impact
Zone 2 impact
Permanent (P) or
for
Stream name
mitigation
(square feet)
(square feet)
T
impact
required?
-Temporary
El Yes
131 ❑P ❑T
❑ No
❑Yes
B2 ❑P ❑T
❑ No
El Yes
B3 ❑P ❑T
❑ No
6h Total buffer impacts
61 Comments
Page 6 of 12
PCN Form – Version 1 3 December 10, 2008 Version

D Impact Justification and Mitigation
1 Avoidance and Minimization
1'a- Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project
Alternatives for each project component were thoroughly evaluated during the SEPA process, and are documented in the
project EA and FONSI (attached) MCCIPS impacts have been limited to a disturbed wetland adjacent to the WWTP site,
which cannot be avoided due to the existing infrastructure at the plant The Muddy Creek force main and SFI lines have been
designe&to parallel or replace existing lines within maintained corridors Some clearing will be required outside existing
corridors due to the need to maintain sewer flow /service during construction Existing cleared easement was used to the
maximum extent practical Parallel lines were located on the upslope side of existing lines (Sites 17, 18, and 19)
Replacement lines were moved further from the, mainstream channel where possible (Site 38) Small impact sites were
avoided by shifting the construction area and installing silt fence at wetland boundaries (Site 5) Anti -seep collars will be
installed at wetland and stream crossings to prevent drainage of Waters of the U S Existing pipe crossings will be used for
maintenance where feasible (Sites 17, 18, 19, and 29) Parallel stream channel was avoided within the construction corridor
(Site 21) Only one manhole will be placed in a wetland due an existing bend in the line that cannot be avoided (Site 13)
1 b Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques
Sediment and erosion control measures will be implemented according to NC requirements, and approved by NCDENR prior
to implementation Jurisdictional areas within the construction limits that are not permitted to be impacted will be clearly
marked`with protection fencing or other similar method to avoid inadvertent encroachment All wetlands will be returned to
existing grade Stream banks will be stabilized with nprap per NWP 12 conditions except where permanent crossings are
permitted Construction corridors and maintained easements have been reduced as much as practical in wetland areas
Cleared forests, outside of the maintained corridor, will be,allowed to,transition to mature forest Stream crossings will.be
constructed in dry conditions using pump - arounds Copies of the issued permits and impact areas will be provided to -the
prime contractor and all subcontractors working in or near jurisdictional areas
2 Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U S or Waters of the State
2a Does the project require, Compensatory Mitigation for
® Yes ❑ No
impacts to Waters ofthe U S or Waters of the State?
2b If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply)
❑ DWQ ® Corps
❑ Mitigation bank
2c If yes, which mitigation option will be used for this
®Payment to in -lieu fee program
projects
❑ Permittee Responsible Mitigation
3 Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank
3a Name of Mitigation Bank
3b Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter)
Type
Quantity
3c Comments
4 Complete if Making a Payment to In -lieu Fee Program
4a Approval letter from in -lieu fee program is attached
® Yes
4b Stream mitigation requested
0 linear feet
4c If using stream mitigation, stream temperature
❑ warm ❑ cool ❑cold
4d Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only)
0 square feet
4e Riparian wetland mitigation requested
0 24 acres
4f Non - riparian wetland mitigation requested
0 acres
4g Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested
0 acres
4h Comments
5 Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
Page 7 of 12
PCN Form — Version 1 3 December 10, 2008 Version

5a If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan
6 Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) — required by DWQ
6a Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires
buffer mitigation?
❑ Yes ® No
6b If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation Calculate the
amount of mitigation required
Zone
6c
Reason for impact
6d
Total impact
(square feet)
Multiplier
6e
Required mitigation
(square feet)
Zone 1
3 (2 for Catawba)
Zone 2
1 5
6f Total buffer mitigation required
0
6g If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e,g , payment to private mitigation bank,
permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in -lieu fee fund)
6h Comments
Page 8 of 12
PCN Form — Version 1 3 December 10, 2008 Version

E
Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ)
1
Diffuse Flow Plan
1a
Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified
❑ Yes ® No
within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
lb
If yes, then is a diffuse flow plan included? If no, explain why
Comments Project is not located within NCDWR protected riparian buffer
❑ Yes ❑ No
watershed
2
Stormwater Management Plan
2a
What is the overall percent imperviousness ^of this project?
<5%
2b
Does this project require a Stormwater Management Plan?
❑ Yes ® No
2c
If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why Nationwide Permit 12 does not require a
stormwater management plan The project involves improvements to existing infrastructure, additional impervious area
is minimal and disturbed areas will be returned to existing grades NCDENR Issued Stormwater Permit No SW4140401
on May 6, 2014 for the Muddy Creek WWTP
2d
If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan, then provide a brief, narrative description of the plan
❑ Certified Local Government
2e
Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan?
❑ DWQ Stormwater Program
❑ DWQ 401 Unit
3
Certified Local Government Stormwater Review
3a
In which local government's jurisdiction is this project?
❑ Phase II
❑ NSW
3b
Which of the following locally - implemented stormwater management programs
❑ USMP
apply (check all that apply)
❑ Water Supply Watershed
❑ Other
3c Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
❑ Yes ❑ No
attached?
4
DWQ Stormwater Program Review
❑ Coastal counties
❑ HQW
4a
Which of the following state - implemented stormwater management programs apply
❑ ORW
(check all that apply)
❑ Session Law 2006 -246
❑ Other
4b Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
Yes ❑ No
attached?
5
DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review
5a
Doesthe Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements?
❑ Yes ❑ No
5b Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met?
❑ Yes ❑ No
Page 9 of 12
PCN Form — Version 1 3 December 10, 2008 Version

F Supplementary Information
1 Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement)
la Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal /state /local) funds or the
® Yes ❑ No
use of public (federal /state) land?
1 b If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an
environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State
® Yes ❑ No
(North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
1c If you answered "yes" to the above, has the document review been finalized by the
State Clearing House? (If,so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval
® Yes ❑ No
letter)
Comments FONSI issued on 11/22/13
2 Violations (DWQ Requirement)
2a Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H 0500), Isolated
Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H 1300), DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards,
❑ Yes ® No
or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B 0200)?
2b Is this an after - the -fact permit application?
❑ Yes ® No
2c If you answered "yes" to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s)
3 Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement)
3a Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in
❑ Yes ® No
additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?
3b If you answered "yes" to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the
most recent DWQ policy If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description
While cumulative effects may occur in the service area, numerous local ordinances, detailed in the EA and FONSI, are in
place to decrease environmental impacts and protect water quality
4 Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement)
4a Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non- disctarge or discharge) of wastewater generated from
the, proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility
The Muddy Creek WWTP currently receives wastewater flow from both the Muddy Creek and South Fork basins
Treatment capacity is limited at the Muddy Creek WWTP, however, the Elledge WWTP has approximately 45 percent of
capacity available to CCUC to handle growth and wet weather issues in the service area The long term treatment of
wastewater will include initial treatment at the MC WWTP, transfer of excess Consolidated Influent to the Elledge WWTP, with
final treatment and discharge to Peters Creek
Page 10 of 12
PCN Form — Version 1 3 December 10, 2008 Version

5 Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or
® Yes ❑ No
habitat?
5b Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act
® Yes ❑ No
impacts?
❑ Raleigh
5c If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted
® Asheville
5d What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical
Habitat?
USFWS Website for Forsyth County,
North Carolina Natural Heritage Program GIS data updated July 2014, and on -site habitat review
Bog turtle surveys, while not required under Section 7, will be performed prior to construction
6 Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitats
❑ Yes ® No
6b What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat?
NOAA EFH mapper
7 Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal
governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation
❑ Yes ® No
status (e g , National Historic Trust designation of properties significant in
North Carolina history and archaeology)
7b What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic,or archeological resources?
HPOWEB Map Service http / /gis ncdcr gov /hpoweb/
National Register of Historic Places http / /www nps gov /nr /research/
SHPO correspondence July 29, 201'3 (ER 13 -1382)
8 Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a Will this project occur in a FEMA - designated 100 -year floodplain?
® Yes ❑ No
8b If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements Coordination with the local floodplain administrator will be
performed and approvals acquired prior to construction, if necessary City of Winston -Salem Floodplain Development
Permit No FORS - 006 -2014 was issued om,june 10, 2014 for the Muddy Creek WWTP
8c What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination? North Carolina Floodplain Mapping Program
http / /www ncfloodmaps com/
Page 11 of 12
PCN Form —Version 1 3 December 10, 2008 Version

Applicant/Agent's Vg-L-
4pip-licant/Ageffs F/nnted,Name AOphcWA40'ht's Signature ate
(Agents signature is valid only if adauthorizatton letter from ft applicant
Page 12 of 12
PCN'Form =Verston 1 3'December 10, 2008 Version

AkTV3"tWVA
-....-
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Pat McCrory
Governor
Ron Hargrove
Winston -Salem CCUC
101 North Main Street
Winston- Salem, NC 27101
Project- South Fork Basin Improvements
Michael Ellison, Director
Ecosystem Enhancement Program
August,26, 2014
John E Skvarla, III
Secretary
Expiration of Acceptance: February 26 2015
County- Forsyth
The purpose of this letter is to notify you that the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program (NCEEP) is willing to accept
payment for compensatory mitigation for impacts associated with the above referenced project as indicated in the table below Please
note that this decision does not assure that participation in the NCEEP will'be approved.by the permit issuing agencies as mitigation
for project impacts It is the responsibility of the applicant to contact these agencies to determine if payment to the NCEEP will be
approved You must also comply with all other state, federaLor local government permits, regulationskor authorizations associated
with the proposed activity including SL 2009 -337 An Act to Promote the Use of Compensatory Mitigation Banks as amended by
S'L 2011 -343
This acceptance is valid,for six,months fiom the date of this letter and is not transferable If we have'not received a copy of the
issued 404 Permit /401,Certification /LAMA permit within this time frame, this acceptance will, expire. lt,is the applicant's
responsibility to send copies,of the permits to NCEEP Once NCEEP receives a copy of the permit(s) an invoice will be issued based
on the required, ititigati on in that permit and payment must be made prior to conducting the authorized work The amount,of the In-
Lieu Fee to be paid to NCEEP by an applicant is calculated based upon the Fee Schedule and policies listed at www nceep net
Based on they information supplied by you in your request to use the NCEEP, the °impacts that may require compensatory mitigation
are summarized in the following table The amount of mitigation required and assigned to NCEEP for this impact is determined by
permitting_agendies,and may,exceed the impact amounts shown below
Impact
River
Basin
CU
Location
Stream (feet)
Wetlands (acres)
Buffer I
(Sq Ft')
Buffer 11
(Sq Ft')
Cold
Cool
Warm
Riparian
Non -Ri arian
Coastal Marsh
Yadkin
03040101
0,
0
0
024
1 0
0
0
0
Upon receipt of payment, EEP will take responsibility for providing the compensatory mitigation The mitigation will be performed
in accordance with the N C Department of'Environment and Natural Resources' Ecosystem Enhancement Program In -Lieu Fee
Instrument dated July 28, 2010
Thank you for your interest in the NCEEP If you have any questions or-need additional mformation, please contact Kelly Williams at
(919) 707 -8915
Sincerely,
(;�w 11�1 ?4u
James Stanfill
Asset Management Supervisor
cc Sue Homewood, NCDWR- Winston -Salem
John Thomas, USAGE- Raleigh
Phil May, agent
File
1652 Mad Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699 -1652
Phone [phone] Internet ,www ncdenr gov
An Equal Opportunity 1 Affirmative Action Employer- Made in part by recycled paper

S�
JA
rl
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Infrastructure
Pat McCrory Kim H Colson, P E John E Skvarla, III
Governor Acting Director Secretary
November 22, 2013
Mr Ron Hargrove, Utilities Director
City /County Utilities Commission
PO Box 2511
Winston Salem, North Carolina 27102
SUBJECT: City /County Utilities Commission
Muddy Creek Consolidated Influent
Pump Station and Collection System
Improvements Engineering Report
Project No.- CS370399 -08
Dear Mr Hargrove.
This is to inform you that the Finding of No Significant Impact ( FONSI) and the
Environmental Assessment have been submitted to the State Clearinghouse. The documents will
be advertised for thirty (30) calendar days in the N.C. Environmental Bulletin Advertising the
FONSI is required prior to a local unit of government receiving financial,support,from the State
Revolving Loan program You will be }informed of any significant comment -or public ob�iectnon
when the advertisement period is completed
A copy of the documents is, transmitted for your record The documents should be made
available to the public
If there are any questions „please contact,me at (919) 707 -9177.
'Srncer
i_
Kim H Colson, P E
Acting Director
044”
Attachment (all cc's)
1633 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699 -1633
Locabon 512,N Salisbury,& Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
Phone 919 - 707 -91601 FAX [phone]
An Equal dpportumly i Affirmative Action Employer
One
NOrthiCarohna,
IN, dwrittlY,

Mr. Hargrove
November 22, 2013
Page Two
CC. Hazen and Sawyer — k4*T4,;Sadler P.E. -
Kavitha Ambikadevi, P:E
Seth Robertson, P.E.
Mark Hubbard,,P.E.
Jennifer Haynie
DWQ Winston Salem Regional Office
FEU /SRF

FINDING OF NO SIGNIFICANT IMPACT
AND ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT
WINSTON -SALEM FORSYTH CITY /COUNTY UTILITIES COMMISSION
MUDDY CREEK CONSOLIDATED PUMP STATION AND
COLLECTION SYSTEM'IlOROVEMENTS
RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT'
AND NATURAL RESOURCES
CONTACT: KIM H. COLSON, P.E., ACTING DIRECTOR
INFRASTRUCTURE FINANCE SECTION
DIVISION OF WATER INFRASTRUCTURE
1633 -MAIL SERVICE CENTER
RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA 276994633
(919)707 -9177
NOVEMBER 22, 2013

(This page intentionally left blank.)

FINDING OF NO SIGNIFICANT IMPACT
Article I, Chapter 113A of the North Carolina General Statutes requires an action to be subject to
the requirements of the North Carolina,Environmental Policy Act(NCEPA) if it involves the
expenditure of public funds and if a potential impact is anticipated to the environment The
project has been evaluated for compliance with the NCEPA and is determined to be a mayor
agency action, which will affect the environment
Project Applicant:
Wmston- Salem/Forsyth County City /County Utilities Commission,
North Carolina
Project Description:
The,project will include construction of the Muddy Creek
Consolidated Influent Pump Station, Muddy Creek force main,
improvements to the South Fork interceptor, and an expansion of
the Kerners Mill Pump Station force main The Muddy Creek
Pump Station will have a capacity of 126 million gallons per day
(mgd) and will include new preliminary treatment and influent
pumping capabilities It will' be located on the existing Muddy
Creek Wastewater Treatment Plant (WWTP) site and will transfer
screened.and degritted wastewater flow to the Archie Elledge
WWTP via the proposed 30 -inch Muddy Creek force main The
project will alsorinclude equalization day tanks, storm equalization
basins, transfer,pumps, and miscellaneous appurtenances at the
Muddy Creek WWTP site Proposed improvements to the South
Fork interceptor will address critical areas by replacement of some
segments and a parallel interceptor for other segments The
proposed interceptor will range from 18 -mch to 30 -inch diameter
pipe- The project will also expand the Kerners Mill Pump Station
to a,fim capacity of 12 6 mgd and total capacity of 15 7 mgd with
all pumps running, a 24 -inch force main parallel to the existing
force main, and a 1,600 lmear foot expansion;of the existing force
main Clean Water SRF funds will be used for improvements at the
Muddy Creek Consolidated, Influent Pump Station and the Muddy
Creek WWTP site.
Project Number:
CS370399 -08
Project Cost:
$112,021,454
Clean Water State
$50,000,000
Re -volving Loan Fund:
Local Funds:
$62,021,454
The review process indicated that significant adverse environmental impacts should not occur if
mitigative measures are implemented, and an environmental impact, statement will not be
required The decision was based on information in the Engineering Report and reviews by
governmental agencies The attached Environmental Assessment supports this action and
outlines mitigative measures that must be followed This Finding of No Significant Impact

( FONSI) completes -the environmental review record, which is' available for inspection at the
State Clearinghouse
No administrative action will be taken on the proposed project -for at least 30idays after
notification that the FONSI has been published in the North Carolina Environmental Bulletin
Sincerely,
Kim H Colson, Acting Director
Division of Water Infrastructure

(This page intentionally left blank)

ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT
A. Proposed Facilities and Actions
The proposed project will include construction of the Muddy Creek Consolidated Influent Pump
Station located at the Muddy Creek Wastewater Treatment Plant (WWTP), Muddy Creek Pump
Station force main, improvements to the South Fork interceptor, and an expansion of the Kerners
Mill Pump Station force main
The Muddy Creek Pump Station will have a capacity of 126 rmllion_gallons per day (mgd) and
will include new preliminary treatment and influent pumping capabilities It will be located on
the existing Muddy Creek WWTP site and will transfer screened and degrrtted }wastewater flow,
to the Archie Elledge WWTP via the proposed 30 -inch diameter and 4 6 mile long Muddy Creek
Pump Station force main The-project will also include equalization day tanks, storm
equalization basins, transfer pumps, odor control system, and miscellaneous appurtenances at the
Muddy Creek WWTP site
Proposed improvements to the South Fork interceptor will address critical sewer by�replacement
of some segments and a parallel interceptor for other segments The proposed interceptor
improvements will include approximately 24,290 linear feet (1 f ) of 60 -inch sewer, 6,6001 f of
42 -mch sewer, 14,1001 f of 36 -inch sewer, 9,1001 f of 30 -inch sewer, 8201 f of 24 -inch sewer,
1,7701 f of 21 -mch sewer, 15801 f of 18 -inch sewer, and 1,5001 f of 15 -mch sewer
The project will also expand the Kerners Mill Pump Station to a firm capacity of 12 6 mgd and
total capacity of 15 7 mgd with all pumps running, a 24 -inch force main parallel to the existing
force main, and a 1,600.1 f expansion of the existing force main
Funding Status The estimated total cost for the project is $112,021,454 The City /County
Utilities Comnussion (CCUC) is applying for a Clean Water State Revolving Fund ( CWSRF)
loan of $50;000,000. The CWSRF loan will be used for installation of mechanical bar screens
and grit removal systems, influent pumps, equalization tanks, flow meters, transfer pumps,
transfer force main, forcemam flow meter, odor control system, and all the related
appurtenances The remaining,$62,021,454 of the project will be funded by local bonds
B. ExistinzEnvironment
Topography and Soils Forsyth County is located in the Piedmont Physiographical Province
The Muddy Creek Pump Station site,slopes from approximately'692 feet to 688 feet above mean
sea level Elevations in the Muddy Creek force main,comdor range from 680 feet to 720 feet
above mean sea level Elevations, in the South Fork interceptor corridor range from 690 feet to
826 feet above mean sea level. The Kerners Mill Pump Station site el'eyations range from 855
feet to 822 feet above mean sea level The elevations in the Kemers Mill force main corridor
range from 825 feet to 950 feet above mean sea level Portions of the project are located in
floodplams Soils in the area include the following associations Chewacla- Wedhadkee-

Congaree, which are somewhat poorly drained and poorly drained loamy surface layer with well -
drained loamy subsoil, Pacolet- Cecil, which are,located in uplands and have a well - drained
loamy surface layer and clay subsoil, Madison- Pacolet, which have well - drained loamy surface
layer and clayey subsoil, Wedowee - Louisburg with have a loamy surface layer and clayey
subsoil or sandy surface and subsoil, and Wilkes -Enon associations, which have a well - drained
loamy surface layer and clayey subsoil
Surface Water The project area is located primarily in the Lower Yadkin River Headwaters
Sub -Basm (HUC 03040101) There are numerous streams in, the project area with classifications
of B, C, WS -III, and WS -IV Primary water quality concerns are associated with densely
populated areas with large amounts -of impervious areas
Water Supply- Drinking water is provided by the CCUC, which operates three water treatment
plants,that draw water from the Yadkin River and SalermyLake for distribution in the project area
C. Existing Wastewater Facilities
The CCUC wastewater service included three sewersheds the Muddy Creek basin, Archie
Elledge'basm, and South Fork basin The system includes`ihe Muddy Creek WWTP, Archie
Elledge WWTP, over 50 pump stations, and approximately 1,790 miles of sanitary sewer ranging
from two inches to 66 inches in diameter The Muddy.Creek WWTP`was originally built in
1986 and was expanded in 1997 from,a capacity of 15 mgd to 21 mgd This, WWTP discharges
primarily to the Yadkin River and has a second wet - weather discharge into Muddy Creek The
facilityas'in adequate working condition except for the preliminary treatment facilities, which
has exceeded its useful life The Archie Elledge WWTP was originally built in 1956 and has
undergone numerous upgrades to the current permitted - capacity of 30 mgd. The facility is in
good.condition The South Fork Pump Station was commissioned in 2006 and,has a fern
capacity of 11 mgd and total capacity of 14 4 mgd. It pumps approximately six to seven mgd to
the Archie Elledge WWTP and one to two mgd to the Muddy Creek WWTP The station has
significant operational issues including pump failures and odor complaints The Kerners Mill
Pump,Stationywas comnussioned,m 1981 and has a firm capacity of 5.7 mgd andiotal capacity
of 7 3 mgd It,is in, good operating,condition
D. Need for Proposed Facilit %s, and Actions
The CCUC's wastewater master planning process,has identified critical needs in,the South Fork
basin collection system to meet anticipated demand and avoid sanitary sewer overflows (SSOs)
The,existing mfrastructureAS,not sized to handle,peak wet"weather flow, and the treatment
capacity of the Muddy Creek WWTP is not available to both the South Fork and Muddy Creek
basins The`proposed project'will address SSOs in`the South Fork and Muddy Creek basms and
will allow for transfer of wet weather flows for distribution • between the two WWTPs as needed
2

E. Alternatives - Analysis
Two alternatives analyses were conducted The.first addressed the South Fork and Muddy Creek
wastewatei infrastructure expansion alternatives, and ithe second addressed the Kemers Mill
Pump Station expansion. Each analysis,ns_discussed below
South fork and�Muddy Creek,Alterriatives
No- Action Alternative The No- Action Alternative would mean continuing to rely on existing
sewer infrastructure The Muddy Creek WWTP does not have capacity to treat projected future
flows in, the Muddy Creek.and South Fork sewersheds. The growing need for wastewater -
treatment would require package,plants or septic tanks, and'SSOs would be a significant concern
This alternative was rejected because it does not meet the project needs
Ex and- South,Fork Lift Statnoneto TransferTlow to.ArchreElled e WWl?P The South Fork Lift
Station was designed to be expandable from 14 4 mgd to 15 mgd The site is adjacent to two
schools, thus limiting the potential for additional expansion To prevent flow violations, this
alternative would- still,,require a transfer pump station at Muddy Creek to transfer,flow to the
Archie Elledge WWTP This ,alternative was rejeeted,because it does not meet the project needs
Construct a New Abbotts Creek Pump-Station and WWTP , This alternative would construct a
new WWTP'to treat flows from the upper South Fork basin and would discharge'to Abbots
Creek, which is a WS -111 stream,and m impaired for fish community bloclassificatron This
alternative could-have significant water quality impacts Furthermore, it would -not alleviaterthe,
projected excess flow to Muddy.Creek WWTP This alternative was rejected because-it does not
meet the project needs
Construct a NewhYadkin RiverWWTR in Davie or Davidson Counties This alternative would
construct a ne, WWTP south ofthe Muddy Creek WWTP discharging to the Yadkin River
This alternative would require inter= county agreements that the Davie and Davidson Counties, are
reluctant to make at this time, and it would require having the,new WWTP operational by 2021
to -meet anticipated flows. The alternative would also have environmental impacts associated
with converting agricultural land to a developed use Based -on the environmental impacts,and
difficulties with getting a plant constructed and' operational within the necessary tnmeframe, this
alternative was rejected
Elledge WWTP: This alternative make improvements at the existing Muddy,Creek WWTP
including aapump,station to,transfer flow to Archie Elledge WWTP, equalization tanks for wet
weather flow, and a force main from Muddy Creek WWTP to Archie Elledge WWTP.
Improvements to,crntical areas of the South Fork interceptor would be,mcluded with this
alternative. The majority of the project would occur on land already used for wastewater
operations, and',environmental impacts, will be minimal This alternative is preferred because it
satisfies the need for the project with minimal environmental impacts

Kerners Mill Pump Station Expansion Alternatives.
No- Action Alternative. This alternative would make no improvements to the Kerners Mill Pump
Station or the related force main infrastructure. The pump station does not have adequate
capacity to meet anticipated needs and would lead to SSOs This alternative was rejected
because it,does not meet the project -needs
Add Two,Submersnble Pumps and Extend Existing Force Main. This alternative would increase
capacity of the existing pump station by adding two new pumps to increase the capacity to 11.6
mgd and extending the force,mam approximately 1,6001 f This alternative woul&nieet capacity
needs through 2016 but not through the full planning period, of 2021 The alternative was
rejected because it does not meet the,project needs
Mann --this alternative wouldadd tw,o submersible pumps and reconfigure ,the wet wells, add a
16 -inch parallel force main, and add a 1,6001 f extension to the force main This project would
meet the project needs nd'has similar environmental impact as the, preferred alternative, but
operating and maintenance costs would be significantly higher.
Mann- This alternative would -add onexsnbmersible pump to reconfigured wet wells, add a 24-
inch force main, and add a 1,6001 f , extension to the existing force main for a firm capacity of
12 6 mgd This is the preferred alternative because it meets the project needs with mammal
environmental impacts and has lower costs than similar alternatives
F. Environmental Consequences and Mitigative Measures
Topogr by and Soils. Impacts to soil and topography will be,related primarily to construction
and will not be. significant Impacts will be mmnmized'by restoring disturbed areas to original
grade after construction and by implementing a North,Carol'ina Department of Environment, and
Natural Resources (NCDENR)- approved and County - approved Erosion and Sedimentation
control plan and other provisions of the- Sedimentationvand'Pollutnon Control Act of 1973
Land Use. Mminal changes or umpaets to land use are expected because the project will occur
in areas that already developed for wastewater infrastructure or within or adjacent to existing
utility corridors except for one portion of the South Fork force main corridor
Wetlands Construction activities may have minor, temporary impacts to wetlands Impacts will
be minimized by narrowing construction corridors in wetland areas and implementing BMPs
Construction will be in accordance with a NCDENR- approved and County- approved Erosion
and Sedimentation Control Plan and other provisions of'the Sedimentation Pollution Control Act
of 1973 to minimize impacts from erosion and sedimentation The U S Army Corps of
Engineers was consulted and did not object to the project (July 10, 2013, Action ID,No SAW
2013 - 01274)
4

Important Farmlands Direct unpacts to important farmlands, will be minimal The pump
stations,are not located on agricultural lands Portions of the sewer corridors traverse prime
farmland currently in agricultural use These areas may have minor, temporary impacts during
construction, but there will be no loss of4armland acreage as a result of the project
Public Lands and Scenic. Recreational and State Natural Areas. Impacts to public lands or
,scenic,, recreational, or state natural areas will be minimal and temporary, during construction
activities Impacts to two bike paths that cross the pipelinecorridors will be minimized b_y
utilizing trenchless, technologies in those areas
Cultural Resources. In a memorandum dated July 29, 2013 (No ER 13- 1382), the North
Carolina State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO) stated that no historic resources, would be
impacted by the proposed project
Air Ogg t Temporary impacts to, air quality, including particulates and> vehicle exhaust
emissions, will,result from construction activities. Proper vehicle maintenance, wettmg of
exposed soil, and prompt soil stabilization,will minimize these,impacts Agnew emergency
generator will have minimal impact
Noise Levels There will, be a temporary increase in noise related to construction equipment
Construction activities will be limited to 6 00 am to 7.00 pm Monday through Friday to the
extent practicable Norse impacts from emergency generators and the new pump station will be
negligible
Water Resources Negative operational impacts to water resources are,not anticipated There is
the potential for temporary impacts due.to erosion and sedi mentation,dunng construction To
minimize such impacts, all construction will be in accordance with a NCDENR- approved and
County- approved Erosion,and Sedimentation Control Plan and other, provisions of the
Sedimentation Pollution,Control Act of 1973 Best Management Practices- (BMPs) will be
implemented to,mini nize impacts from stormwater
Forest Resources: The project will require clearing of approximately-two acres. of forested land
adjacent to existin&maintained corridors for pipe installation Approximately 13 acres will be
allowed to transition naturally back to mature forest.
Shellfish or Fish and Their Habitats Impacts to shellfish, fish, and their habitats are not
expected to be significant. Construction impacts will be minimized, through adherence to a
NCDENR- approved and County- approved Erosion and Sedimentation.ControbPlan and other
provisions of the Sedimentation Pollution Control Act of 1973
Wildlife and Natural Vegetation Impacts to wildlife and natural vegetation will be,temporary
due to construction activities As requested by North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission
(September 27, 2013), the contractor will conduct a survey for the bog turtle prior to
commencing construction activities to prevent impacts to the protected species
5

Introduction of Toxic Substances. introduction of toxic substances from construction activities
is possible from vehicle fluids Such impacts will be minimized by proper vehicle maintenance
and proper collection of and disposal of fluids
The U S Fish and Wildlife Service reviewed the proposed project and concluded that the
requirements of Section 7(a)(2),of the Endangered Species Act have been fulfilled (July
23, 2013, Log No 4 -2 -13 -312). The North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission, Natural
Heritage Program, and DWR Winston -Salem Regional Office, and U.S Army Corps of
Engineers concur with the proposed project The North Carolina Department of Cultural
Resources is not aware of any properties of architectural, historical, or archaeological
significance, that would be affected by the project
G. Public Participation, Sources Consulted
A public meeting was held on September 21,, 2013 including an informational presentatzon�about
the meeting There were no objections to the project The current user charge for a typical
customer is $38 71 per month for 5,000 gallons for sewer and, water The proposed project is
expected to cause an increase of $8 04 per month for a total of $46 75
Sources consulted about this project for information or concurrence included
1) City of Winston -Salem
2) Forsyth County
3) North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
- Wildlife Resources Commission
-DWR Winston -Salem Regional Office
- Division of Au Quality
- Division of Environmental Health
- Division of Water Resources Public Water Supply Section
- Division of Forest Resources
-Office of Legislative and Intergovernmental Affairs
4) North Carolina Department of Cultural Resources
5) North Carolina State Clearinghouse
6) U S Fish and Wildlife Service
7) U S. Army Corps of Engineers
on

to • E s
. a
k ♦r s � ;
' �.. � E'er ,►
�e
l
r
da
a
M
O
I
LL
U)
a
c�
G
U
v�
Mary_ ROICI
fd
/ c C
Ca
c [Q
s
o
o O
U V
m O
LL
�+E y
a �
t�
O `yay
E a
C
�
c •� m o
c
c
So
� o
Q�
N j c C
- O, O
U
I
O y
LL
� v�
1
U
(
a
Y A
��
/f
TU
70 N
o
?
U
I
}
LO
vJ
H
V
� �
O
V-
.
�W
v
C)
ry:na:r 8rench
I
V�
x
LL
J
V
W
/{y
Q
c�
J,to� a
O
c
o
a
Y
s'
Ira ?
4.
Pi
8
� to <• O �
d \ O OC
CL E
cm
m Y @ Q — Ll1 C N
LL
70 Co
NmIT Incfl�z
Q m a) N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
C E T a z ��
Qi X . , � Q L LL LL LL LL LL LL a� c� 7 U N
d W co co Y Y }' (n CO CO CO to (n �o > o LO
® s N I I
�_ .
0

RE:
t4ov all
C*
R,J -
VAAZej.�IGH, SA\NYF O N6

• l
`l'
FK k��s'� t€, e a Aw
ms�.� i t
'.
`� y•'-.' ay. Y - ,r'r �,":+"� _ .� „` Kr`,
City ®f Winston- Salea-
FLOODPLAIIN DEVELOP,MENTTERMIT '
Permit Number FOR § - 006 =2014 Issuance Date June 10, 2014 4 PIN 116 801- 59'629800
M llu
In,accordance with the City -of Winston- Saleni Floodway and Floodway Fringe Regulations, a,Floodplam,bevelopment
Permit is hereby granted to:,- Winstori= Silem/Forsyth County Utilities Dtviston as a result of review -_ andeapprovall,ofthe
r G .VL r7l"C71 MIU oayy YGi �LjlyuylliuGU[a/ t:at�.,a�ioti:ia w ua. n+ +��w�.i ” 1, _
to­,, developmentsactivities within the area of spectal�flood�hazard €along tlieistream channel on the,east side,of the
Muddy'Creek Waste Water Trea_'tftentPlant,property'at tlfe;above,`referenced Parcel PIN'
This Permit is issued to the aforemeritioued individual,-frin, partnership, municipality etc, for the purpose noted above "and in
accordance w"ithathe City of Wiristoip= Salem'Flood way,. and- FlaodwayrvFrmge °Regulatrons,,Flgodpliin Development, &fnit
No FORS- 006 -2014 atid,aiiachfnenfs`thereto, and is,subJect td :the fbl wmg,modifications'and/or performance reservations
1 Permit i`ssue&for thefollowing development only-
,Excavation-__ X Fill X Grading X Utility Construction X
Road Construction - Resideniial Construction- NonresidentiabConstruction _ X
Addition-, Renovation Other (specify) Influent Pumping Station Iinproverients
Floodplam/Floodway Approval Conditions for, Development- mclude ea) The consfruction-liindi of the project =as
provided' m`the APPROVED PLANS,shouid be flagged prior to-work to ensure no work occursEbeyond the,approved,
limits, b) allteonditions as set forth_ in tChapter,.G,,Article lI of the UOO of'Winston- Salem/Forsyth County, -NC, shall be
met-
2' ;Prtiper_,Erostor,and Sediment (control,measures, shall be installed and'maintained in accordance with;North Carolin a
State Standards and'or approved erosion control plan during all construction operations
3 elf any, obstacle prevents the,construction,of this,proJectas approved here, notification, revised plans, aril engineering
analysis may be required'for submittal', review and,approval prior to any permanentchanges,on the construction site
Failure to compiy}with,the=City of Winston -Salem Floodway and Floodway Fringe Regulations including any modifications
and /or performance reservations could result infassessirient_of civil penalties or initiation' of civil or criminal court actions
Issued "this 10a' day of June , 201,4
Matthew Osborne
� L H
FloodplainAdministrator 'fo,City of Winston- Sa
lem/Forsyth
County.

. f
T
4
R
North Carolina Department'of'E�_Enulron men t,and °Natural Resources
Pat McCrory
Governor
May 6, 2014
Mr- Courtney Drivei
Deputy Director on Utilities
Suite 357, City Hall
101 N Main Street
Winston-Salem, North Carolina 27101
Subject Stormwater Permit No SW,4140401
Muddy Creek Wastewater Treatment Plant
Dear Mr Driver
John E Skvarla, III
Secretary
The Division of Energy, Mineral, and Land Resources (DELMR), received a complete Stormwater
Management Peimit Application for th6,subject project on April 14, 2014 Staff review of the plans and
specifications has determined that'the project, as proposed, will comply with the'Stormwatei Regulations set
forth in Title 15A NCAC 211 1000 and Session Law 2006-246 We are - forwarding Permit No SW4140401,
dated Apiil 14, 2008, f6r the construction, opeiation and mamtenance,ofthe subject project This permit shall
be, effect i ve,from the date of issuance�and shall be subject to the conditions and limitations as specified
theiem, and does not supersede any other agency permit that may be required
If any parts, requirements, or limitations contained in this permit are unacceptable, you have the iight to
request an adjudicatory hearing by filing a wiitten petition with the =Office of Administiative Hearings
(OAH) The written petition must confoi m to Chapter 150B of the North =Carolina General Statutes Per
NCGS 143- 215(e) the petition must be filed with the OAH within thirty (30) days of.receipt of this pei mit
You should contact the OAH,with all questions regardmg�the filing -fee (if a filing fee is required) and /oi the
details of the filing process at -6714 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699 -6714, or via telephone at 919-
431 -3000, or visit their website at www NCOAH com Unless such demands aie,made this peimit shall be
final and'bmding
This project will be kept on file at the Winston -Salem Regional Office If you have any questions, or need
additional information conceining this matter, please contact Mike Randall'at (919) 807 -6374, or
mike randall @ncdenr gov
for Tracy E Davis, PE, CPM, Directoi
cc SW4140401 File, Winston -Salem Regional Office
ec Randy Ashbuin, black & Veatch International Co
Division of Energy, Mineral, and1and Resources
'Energy Section,- Geological Survey�Section,• Land Quality Section
1612 Mail Service Center, Raleigh „North,Carolina 27699 - 1612;919- 707 -92001 FAX 919 - 715 -8801
512 North Salisbury Street, Raleigh, North Carolina 27604 - Internet htta / /portal°ncdenr orglwebilrl
An Equal Opportunity,\ AfBrmative,Action Employer - 50% Recycled110% ?osfConsumer Paper

d
a
H
m
E
E
D
E
E
d
h
�I'�
Ln
m
m
t0 to
m m
.-1
v
tD
m
m
m
N
to
O M
v m
O1
m
t0
m
m
v
01
v
O
v
m
to
N
v
b
to
.-I
m
O O
v a
O N
v
°Ey',
a
=R
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
o
o a
o
o
~
to rj
=a� °E
M
m N
o �
ti
t0
�
o
m
o
m�
ry
o m
v m
m
m
'm
O
O
v
m
N
m
m
p o
v v
o
v
ai
p
w 10
�
�i�(ta7
m
v
n v
t0
n
M
N
Vl
m M
V1
m
to
v
m
o
m
N
.ti
N
M
M m
to
V
to
V
c
o
°
°
u
u°
u° u°
u
u
u
u
u
V u
u
u
u
u°
u°
u
u
u°
u°
u° u°
u
u
.vWsr,�
c
c
c c
c
c
c
c
c
c
c
c<€
E
C
E E
C
C
E
E
C
E E
C
E
C
E
`c
E
E
E
E
C E
C
C
c C
d
C
O
c
d
c
C
C
c
C
a_
a_
_
d
d
N
N
N
d
N W
60`l
d
_
u
V
u
V-a
v
u u
V
V
m
U
m
U
m
d
U
m
v
U
V
u U
u
U
N
N
N
d
N
N N
J
-
J
--
J J
J
J
J
J
J
V
V
N
U
w
u
u
U
u
U u
y
y
m
Y
Y
Y-
Y
Y-
Y
Y
Y
Y
v>
U
v
U
E
d
E
d
E
d
E
d
E E
N N
v
V
v
V
, tb
LL
LL
LL LL
`LL
LL
LL
LL
LL
'O LL
LL
LL>
v
J
>
v
tU
an
tU
to
N
�
N
to
N 10
M to
E
E
nr?
z
j jz
z
y
y
Y
« Y
Y
Y
o
0
0
o
0 o
m
m
J
J
J J
J
J
J
J
t5
J'6
J
O O
J
O
J
O
1D
M
M
°
°n
°n v°
°n
°nu°v°v°-
^--
F-
rrrrrr
0��
o
Q,,
p
>>>>>>
r
r
r r
r
r
r
r
r
N�
r r
r
ti
r
a
s
>}
x
o
3
a
a
a
a
a°
a
a
a a
a
a
N
to
�
N h
V1
N
to
to
T N
H
M
N
VI
N to
to
to
Y
Y
Y Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y Y
Y
Y
C
C C
C
C
C
C
N
N N
N
A
N.
N
N
N
N���
�
o
m
-
m
m
C
o 0
m m
- —
0
m
-
o
m
-
o
m�m
-
o
—
m
v
C
co m
v v
C C
m
v
C
m
v
C
m
v
C
m
v
G
m
v
G
m
v
C
m
v
C
m
v
C
m
v
C
m m
v v
C C
m
v
C
m
v
C
N
m
m m
am+
m
am+
m N
N
C
m
C
m
C
N
C
N
C
N
C
N
C
A
C
m
C
m m
C C
m
C
m
C
C
O
C C
C
C
C
C
0
0 0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
O
O O
O
O
o'am
r>
r t
r
r
r
C
m>>
m>
m
m
m
m
m>
m
m>>
m
tv
>
v v
v
d
v
v
>
> >
t
>
>
a
>
u
>
u
>
u.
>
>
u
>
u
>
> >
u
>
u'u
>
� E
r t.
J
U
W
V u
V
u
u
U
W
lL W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
txi
xi xi
xi
W
s
AC
in
N
N
m
N
....
to
m
ul
O
n
M
In
lMD
m
n
m m
n
m m
+
+ +
+ n
m
+
N
,+
V
+
++
a
.� w
+m
m
+
zx
m
m .ti
�����.�
m
N
m
n
lD
m+
N
+ +
t0 n
m
0
Ol
V
v
V
V
1�
w
.....
m
.
n
eVl
O
N
ho
m
o N
m
to
oyo
m
.
o
m
.� m
m M
m
'm
M
ry
o
u
o
o
u
to
�0
u
to
0
u
m
0
u
o+
0
u
ry
u
m
u u
m
u
ry
'u
c
u
��LLL
u
u u
u
u
u
u
u
u u
v
u
u
u
iv
u
u
u
u
5
u
iv
r
A
%
nE
N
m V
V
D
n
m
O
O
N N
N
N
m
N
v
H
m
N
t0
H
n
m
ti
O1
H
O
N
N
N N
m
N
v
N
`6%�
in
to
to to
to
to
m
vi
m
an en
✓f
to
to
to
M
to
to
an
N
to m
m
to
m3�
rn
m
o
N m
v
N
to
N
tc
N
n
N
m
N
O M
M M
v
M
to a
m r

ar
J2
H
2
E
E
H
ii
O
E
v
c
m
3
d '�'t +, N,
`
O
0
a
0
N
0
M
0
a
0
l0
0
m
M�
N
O
m
O
m
O
I
a
O
a
O
m
O
fl
O
1.'
O
00
n
��,�
o
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
O
0
0
0
0
0
O
o
0
i Q
q✓ p e,
o
m
m
m
a
n
m
n
m
1l
v
to
m
m
n
n
o
a
M
m
M
m
N
m
Ln
N
n
Lc
l0
Ln
m-
w
Il
N
a
O
d
.,g" y �` •
'VI
rl
v
�-1
m
rl
N
o
00
ti
N~
N
ti
m
M
oo
M
rs�>i,,l�d'N
t0
O
O
O
t0
O
M
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
N
Rua s
m
E -Ev
a
a
n
f x000000N�o000000000u+
s3 _
r
3 �'.�
O
O
M
O
a
o-"-
N
'-I
O
M
O
m
O
""�
O
a
�O
a
O
m
O
r,
O
p
I,
O
N
O
-3E `�`Y+
TEgt
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
x
0
.�
• J
�a
4q £�
~
o
00
m
In
n
a
n
Ln
m
ti
N
1,
a
M
M
Ln
l0
N
l0
t0
(3)
LO
N
pap
n
N
N
y
O
a
-0,0
`
`0
`o
`o
`0
`0
`o
`0
at- •,
0
u
0
u
0
u
0
u
u
u
0
u
0
u
u
u
u
o
,u
u
u
u
u
0
u
0
z
0
z
0
z
0
z
0
z
Y
y
0
z
0
z
0
z>
o
z
o
z
0
z
0
z
0
z
0
z
LL
v%vl
�.v.
0
LL
0
LL
0
LL
0
�LL
0
LL
Y«
0
LL
0
LL
0
LL
y
0
LL
0
LL
0
LL
�0
LL
0
LL
0
LL
�F� w
O
o
0
0
0
0
0
0
v
0
0
0
0
0
0
iv
,�
O
3
o
3
0
3
0
3
0
3
0
p
LL
0
p
LL
O
3
0
3
0
3
p
LL
0
3
0
3
0
3
0
3
0
3
0
3
o
`m
m
v
m
v
m
v
m
M
Y
v
m
v
m
m
Y
o
`m
v
m
v
m
v
m
TE
m
-E
m
�oxxxxx
v
v
o
a
a
3
3xxx
a
3xxxxxx
-o
v
a
v
v
v
c
LO
C
C
C
C
C
n
m
m
C
C
c C
m
C
C
C
C
C
C
>`m
E
E
E
E
E
x
x
m
E
m
E
m
E
y
z
m
E
m
E
m
E
m
E
m
E
m
E
0
0
010
0
o
0
0
o
o
o
�0
0
o
w
p
vl
o
m
rl
o
m
z
0
m
v
0
m
r
o
m
0
m
v
0
m
z
o
m
z
0
m
z
0
m
r
0
m
o
m
Z
O
m
Z
o
m
c d
/O E
d
Q
0
Q
l7
Q
2
Q
O
Q
V
Q
m>
Q
Q
Q
Q
N
3
x
cc
Q
D
Q
F-
Q
Ln
Q
z
Q
a+H�
3
3
3
33
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
N
0
io
0
m
0
m
0
m
0
m
C,
0
io
C
0
m
C
12
m
C
0
io
C
0
iu
C
0
m
C
0
m
C
0
m
C
0
m
C
0
m
C
0
is
4,
_
N
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
m
>
m
>
m
J
m
>
m
>
m
re a,
u
Q
m
u
x
m
u
x
mm
u
x
W
iu
x
W
m
u
x
W
m
u
x
W
m
u
x
W
m
u
x
W
m
u
x
W
m
u
x
W
u
x
W
u
x
W
u
x
W
u
x
W
u
x
W
u
x
W
3
W
W
C
G
C
C
C
C
C
Ci
C
m
C
m
C
m
C
m
C
m
C
fa
C
m
C
m
"0
2
m
C
pp
C
m
C
'a
C
m
C
m
C
Lw
C
m
C
m
C
Lw
C
UO
C
Lw
C
Lw
C
m
C
m
C
np
C
3sa
JAdalOl
U
u
O)
u
Ol
u
OJ
u
O!
u
O)
u
O/
u
O)
u
OJ
u
OJ
u
m
u
m
u
Ol
u
O7
u
Ol
u
OJ
u
A
st,
@ 'p W
c .¢
N
m
w
m
c
m
E
`E✓ &k�
O
1p
n
C
N
to
Ln
Ln
LO
m
Z2
Ln
m
m
.--I
Ln
o0
O
M
a
N
m
O
q
�V
N
N
N
N
N
M
M
m
V
V
y
V
U
u
u
U
U
6 "A
V
U
2
L1
N
L.L.
of
LL
o
L.L
of
LL
of
L.L.
vL
LL.
o
lL
o
lL
N
Ly
of
U
�
�
U
�
V
�
N +13
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
1
3
3
3
3
3
Lp_
�
C
C
m
N
a
%s': w L'
£9N
f0
m
N
u
N
a
V1
m
m
o
c
0!
E
v
H
O
a
Ol
t
to
m
d
E

,f;uno3 gj.fsaoA
euliO.te,3 'waleS-
°
[ IOZ `s3uvpunoR Xluno3 �,OQ
� m,
bI OZ lsn�nd
4 ;.ION uo;saI,r,
c - - -'�
TB
s ;uawanoadtui uise8 3laoq 4 ;nos
I IOZ sailgediunA LOG3N :=
�Z lOZ speom 1043N `OIOZ saipoq.lal C
OLSS-SSS-(616Yd 5901-909-(616) :d
OZSLZ JN 'uoICe IJ M Zb JN Ob0£
'ONI 'SW3.LSAS033
� UJI JaFO.I d :I ain2� �
.
:SaajnoS ele4
f/NI"102It/�
� c�
c
uj
J
r
ire
RejO n
1
E
ri
3N
pa 6ingfeM
-
� ff
�a
u
c
V
v
a 7
1.=
�GO °d.fysn,8
—_ O
N
L
0 C. V LL
0
y , \ \\
L E i
C.
Q m
o
e4fO-Y
d= a
4
O (D i
V
L
O
C v
Z LL �Q
_
r
�
a
iL.
O
N
°
4
d
old Lexington Rd
O
°
Q
U
*-
oy�ysZ'9
m
Y
3
�'
2
h ECG iti'
V
s
h s
�
h
0
O
Y ..
C4
2
O
T
4
U
U
aslo
i; y
erryman Branc
A�a�'''
ate
.I CO �
�
�
O Q
c
L 0
dL
O 4op@r
�
Q
3 O ssap�s
°l" sari
�
a
3
V
c
i
N
V
L
..
CL
)Lc —
—0
a>
o
9IL
'°
U.
a
LL
U. i c
N U
to
o
w
7
� \ u
is
a
O
N
N
E z
II s
I
r
4
'vm
o =_
E
'^
s
L
g c
�
Un
o �
w
a u
aai v N
Gi
a
V c
v o
y
U
o a Z o k
s
C
7 LJ y
s
G
C/) L1. r� Q
0

S ;unoa q;ffsioa blozisnSnd
uuyo.ae�) gjaoNj `males- uojsui (£ioZ) Aumpm PUe a(£IOZ) ouxoataM `(£IOZ);sua maIES- uoIsurM
sauawano.idm uisu ao no a(£IOZ) Isom Luolus- uo;suiM :sdLw ol2mipuno 000bZ:I SJSfl OLSS'S85 (616 a9901-909-(616):d
I $ ?[ �{� S OZSLZ )N'UOIARID 3SOM Z4 JN 040£
:aainoS eIeQ 'ONI `SW31SAS003
S9S[I :Z a.inSig vNI"IOUVZ)
03 H.LILI;7[03 4 E/1
WI. pJS LH �lCI Ot:G,MlV7ry ; ' ^ � •U
Cu wl.wauN�e , a ".I _ _ _ - l ,_ . _ c.,. 1•'.
-
_
I
Ao
i
77
3FY v1VMl3 � � ^�P. .�..+•�i° 1 , z I I r , . r 1 • � _ _
- �W � "7x111'. yl• - � � ,, - _
"• wl}n'.Or Sf AV,, j w 0711rDM
lT$71
7Gl• €aM �R, �J I+r •3.-. !
fS s' ?;✓ l� d. fJr/ , 1 ric T l.r - i ' "_y�y� , 1111 uxiTr�y]oJry
"�?' � yr rIDC� ��Lr rT I �� I M �_E 't , -��_b � � �. jh x_.• •
yyy��� I � I ♦,.� 1 /� ��G QT .'i� '' •E � Y � .I- ,. I11 _ : 73/du.��l
l 1 n1 S3C'S .i..._ I 35j - -_IQr
ccQ C I 2
s
L >'t r'' •I j t •,� ` \ "senesnesniu` �' "~
�a. • — � ,I.� I a�E� -, 1 �'h�� ` ✓` _ �•� ��'L. � V.' ;�3rr, 1 _ ,,ln r r-
I
� ifl Sal.T
MW _ '�-,+ r �l'/ i -r1 X33 II _ _ 1 •rh rt r.. ^;
Nr
NO tla ^thy f_IIRVrfy aI.YO
� r
Lw
X13.7r•1r -]AM ( ,J lnyry �:fr•r1 E-00 vP.
�,? 1 ,AMITA 7' LtQ RD) ?r10Cl.:4 ( un r•,vef.W `
LMaf rata
� 4 313 .. ✓'�'. w
db ]Tarp -t{ I C T. -�vC - M1. �i" _ { , .7•� �• a W h S"`�, mr
G_fh r.lrESt
V L, Ofi aEL P'• •F. i'.� , �.
uxK I 4
tQ
Y I1 lU1.13w,
Q
a
a, ( 5? r -
-Y war.
CIl - M � ..
�
k
- W
4
•i�y — �
In
•.
k

00
cav�
U
C.
E
C
U
cC
E
L.
u
CL,
� rl
i
q
� � c
w o3
a
� y
g
E �
C
�p IM
in O C W
C O
0
E
�
0
N
0
[j♦
u o
Np
a
� y
g
E �
C
�p IM
in O C W
C O
0
0
N
0
[j♦
u o
Np
o�
N
N
Q
U
za
M 0.

E
U
03
0.
E
C
N
a
3
i
LV�
a �z�
o w
W64 o
w �3
N N
a a
E E
� a
o �
a
� y o
C
C O U a�i
lop
o �^
0
N
O
Z �Q
[js
i p o
N
r
!u n
owl
{n z
N
z U u
y�
j 3
Ct�N° Q
V �
td� �ui Z 0,
V W om 0.

0
„ N M
� O
O a
VA
N � •�
� � L
� � O
�30
N y
c U
sz n.
E �
v v
y
to
LZ C U
o �
a
c
13
� a a
o�
�n
0
N
O �
Z �Q

E a
E
E d U
E_
.a c
c o
o c o
F .
Q LT
O
U
z°
N p
� r
�M N Vi
w �� o
N
x , U w
�+ v �
3� �
4N°
a
4 u�
U
d z�
u w ° a
c c
E a
E
E d U
E_
.a c
c o
o c o
F .
Q LT
O
U
z°
N p
� r
�M N Vi
w �� o
N
x , U w
�+ v �
3� �
4N°
a
4 u�
U
d z�
u w ° a

� � ■
» e
� oU�
� � � � ■ .§
® f
ƒ<
cn
\
3 [ e S E
a ƒ
\ ƒ _
2

O
z-C
3
N
1�
N y
c. o.
E i
y
E
o
a
a � �
� a o
p�
ow
�n
0
N
O �
Z Q�
a
Z N
� O
N
i Z h op
o a �
W ° N
it � In
d by
0 It N 1
0
Vic Z
rr��
V U
r� w V °� o
MLL
4 43
A
v
�
cZU
rA
P6I
' G
N y
c. o.
E i
y
E
o
a
a � �
� a o
p�
ow
�n
0
N
O �
Z Q�
a
Z N
� O
N
i Z h op
o a �
W ° N
it � In
d by
0 It N 1
0
Vic Z
rr��
V U
r� w V °� o
MLL

d �,1 LZ O •�
c P
all
i o h o
cz cd
REP
M o
V] N
1 `
z �cz
z�
Q U
z�
((.,}/ o
u iii a°n a

a� E
E
two �
k e
(z f j $
k o o
Ij
lap
t
€
€ s
` oll
i � S i
t o
th
0 Sao
U
t€ 3rJfI
U
U Ma

00
a�
:a
E E
v
CL
0 0
a
�4U
N. -
Q cl
U U
C13
�
3 3 a
Ln m
0
o
u � � 3
o u.
c�
0
o
z r4
h r
r-
0' U kA
iA z o,
W
°
U w
J 3 a
<Qza
U Mw

�
E
�
oZU
i
y
� a
^
o
L L
L
F a J5
c
O
�
�
U
C
1
Ilk
v
Cd
Z 4 �
ji S x E E S L
j y ii
66
N p
mpw! N vt
U V'1
z�
qj
W
tb
w�
� 0.

o � �
� ova
E
a �ZU
« N
U
Ilkb
0
O M
a
� N
� O
N
O
n ,n
N
O �
VI v b5
N C
0 Q ��
a0u
uo
Vt+ a
w°a

t
Match Line 11
llb
a
o 0
L
��z E
WO,
; �q �
vs
3 3 a
F a
I
U ct 3
0 o U �
i�
E ou
5
Vo
o_
Z�
z°
N p
h �
N
� Uv,
YI z�
bzsA
a3� �
Q
© U
u M
!I_ CL

Match

r
r
� Ilk z,
j� �Tpg
p a j
r
r
� Ilk z,
Q i.
U
�4u
� w o
w
aQ
E£
c� a
o m
a
H a°' J5
N
E �
b
c � �
o U �
N
�n
0
N
O �
Z �Q
s
2p
--P
z�
W °' o
N
Z U
J
N Q
QUz
p �
u
0 0..
t
sF
Q i.
U
�4u
� w o
w
aQ
E£
c� a
o m
a
H a°' J5
N
E �
b
c � �
o U �
N
�n
0
N
O �
Z �Q
s
2p
--P
z�
W °' o
N
Z U
J
N Q
QUz
p �
u
0 0..

t
as
0
" o
� U
rr
Cd o
^^U
FBI
VA
d
i
I.
G� y
V
�4u
as
� o
,w
� w o
E �
v b
3 3 G s
o
a
..
d b
� 8 v
v ck U 3
topZ�
Ow
O
N
O
Z —!!�Q5Q
0
N O
W) r
N
mj
YAM m 7 �
v bA
T O Q
a,©u°
CD
u w M 0.

V
U
cd
N
O
0
w
a-
oo
U
cd
0.
E
it
O
ss,
ll
i
� c c
o4U
0
N N
U
E ¢
N
o �
a
13 N
E ro
w
�n
o�
Z Qb-
s
0
N o
N y�
N
Z U
ci � bhp
N � Q
� O
U
z�
o
U0 R.

..
�c
3 ■
. \.
�
E
� ■
EU�
ƒt§
. �
�2U
a
«
� ©
:�.
u ^~
■
.§
�
..
�c
3 ■
. \.
�
E
� ■
EU�
ƒt§
�2U
a
u ^~
■
.§
�
A
\ \
) ) �
\ \ ) )
/ 2 U \
z .q
§ �
/ / \
\ ] ) \
\ ƒ \ }
'
2
3
/
c
2�
u o
§(
$ /\
Vie\ /
� &\) /
<U {\
U W$ci:

Lpa�
ow
0
0
No
r4
N
� U �
c
' -a.,.. - �` �," _.-- �,..,.- ....,...............
:3 � Vl
3 rn �
" M F.

4 0
00 ._
Lv�
Q. .0
w � 3
N
� U
H
o
a
65
� y
o �o
s
o c U ?
u 3
Ow
�n
0
N
O �
z p p
N
r
°i N v�
z00
z{�. i u O
0 j Vl a�'i bD
i�l 3 10
0 �o Q
�
h
Vw

4
rA
� �ZU
� � 8
w
bD
Q.
\
v €
f 3
o `w 0
c o
o
o
3
o
Uo
N
w U w N
d �o ¢
�0u
duo
uwMa

a�
w �
N �
a� y
oU
oZU
D G4 0
\ 4 I
G
� v
8 �
saw 0
op
Mm-
,I i t p P j x h,n
.,,,,✓ i '
U �
d
�o Q
U�
l�
V W M c;

U
Cd
E
i
.40000,10
L
9
3
c �
� 3
� o
o
�s
o
ME
� U
a a
E �
N v'
o �
U E
E,
N
8 3 �
Io
C O
O
�P ?®
w
�n
0
N
O �
Z �Q
u g
z p
N p
� r
O
U
du
CD
l�i`'CD
VWma
II
I
I/
N
tV
. II
00
o4U
Q
, pmll
SRO,
E
aa^
9
3
c �
� 3
� o
o
�s
o
ME
� U
a a
E �
N v'
o �
U E
E,
N
8 3 �
Io
C O
O
�P ?®
w
�n
0
N
O �
Z �Q
u g
z p
N p
� r
O
U
du
CD
l�i`'CD
VWma
II
I
I/
N
tV
. II
9
3
c �
� 3
� o
o
�s
o
ME
� U
a a
E �
N v'
o �
U E
E,
N
8 3 �
Io
C O
O
�P ?®
w
�n
0
N
O �
Z �Q
u g
z p
N p
� r
O
U
du
CD
l�i`'CD
VWma

1
co
wft un
ftft
OAV
1
1
s
O N x
� CC 1
,�,..,. ,_. 1
eal /
f~
... V1
L
o
U 3
z •�
N
� i V
O O
� w o
w
N
O, 0.
3 3 �
o �
E 3 �
0
o �
N
O
N
0
Z �Q
Z�
N O
h n
+• U vi
z�
N
Iii 3 a �
0 Ury a
U
o�

m
E
z U
w
� �
Ilk,
3
A4
'
E a
N
o �
1
,r
CL
a�
pW
o y
o0
y o,
N
,E
M
......'
O
N
3
W
C
Z U
3 a
�
v 3
Z 3
t�1(�(a='
V / M 4
..........

y
,c
Ilk,
t
c
D
fsr o
�N
a. a
E E
U
cd
�
E 3 �
Ilk,
s =
a.
O
U
N
� �
O
3 cn
N
z
x'' y
cn
U
3
,mow t 1
VW°6:

� a a
N �•�
oZUi
•rA
� f1r o
Qa
EE
Re
3 3 �
c� a
6
Y
o m
ow
�n
0
N
O �
z �Q
t]s
o
N p
N
w °
N
00 6 Q
4Z
Uzi
u M0.
� �
O
3 con
coo
•
G' C�
o
� 3
G
G �
v
3
•3
z
� a a
N �•�
oZUi
•rA
� f1r o
Qa
EE
Re
3 3 �
c� a
6
Y
o m
ow
�n
0
N
O �
z �Q
t]s
o
N p
N
w °
N
00 6 Q
4Z
Uzi
u M0.

�
n
%q
9 �
�
8 /
ƒ 2
�2
\ƒ
. �
k °
m
U�
\k
/ 3
o
Z.
� § E
� ■
7 oQ�
§
� /2U
�
� / k
� ■ /
2
� / \
\ ) } \ §
} [ \ u \
� ( )
c ]
�
c4
\ #
� q
c
2 � �
�, C'4 /
U ®
_ \
� } 4
\j
$�

M
� N
U N
cam? cn
r-+ U
N
U
y c�
N
.D cC
L
3 V)
c
o �
O
•� 3L.
O
z •3
lkk
M
� N
U N
cam? cn
r-+ U
N
U
y c�
N
.D cC
L
3 V)
c
o �
O
•� 3L.
O
z •3
N
K 0.
G
N
N
3 3
� a
o =
a t°
N
N ~
E 3 �
c o
0
k 3
U
ow
O
N
O
Z �Q
i
0
N O
N �
z�
a�
N \ Q
iV✓ y�I 7 �
Q z
u Z „
o�
�
O r3
N
K 0.
G
N
N
3 3
� a
o =
a t°
N
N ~
E 3 �
c o
0
k 3
U
ow
O
N
O
Z �Q
i
0
N O
N �
z�
a�
N \ Q
iV✓ y�I 7 �
Q z
u Z „
o�

•R
I .y+
Ro
YX
' j E
112 cn
CA
a c°
L
°
C �
O V �
N
p
•3 Li � UNo
rA N A
h
O ¢' "�► o rn
� N
U •� 3 � N � Q
II// �YYiiii 7 �
U
U ©z
o
z 3 .. UWMa

rq
N
to
._„w'µ�� -..-•� a
o 7;=
0
O
M
U
ca
Q
Im
� c c
� �ZU
D G4 0
0
a a
CE E
M1 3 N
Y � N
� a
U
E
n
♦'
y �
E 3 �
o
0
� 3
amp
C,
zN
CD �
h
N v
of
W °
zF�
N
a C
U z
+1'� CD
V r ° a

jI }gad j
y
y
IfflMh
3 <'
ci
a
/MCd
Ulu-41t,i
C
�3
,
V
cc
,
a
G C1.
.
,
AMg
e
a id
I
y �
r o ilk
in
�+
a a
U
lop
1
O '2
L
cz
1 �.
p
�
�
O
Z --Mmm-eQ
�1
3
,N`
U
-v
♦,
x o
r
E
♦
Z 00
�"
r♦
♦
wl
O O�
,fir
.�
♦
W
N
3
1. 17 1.
=0
♦ �\
J �w3a
v '3���AL
\♦♦
a Uf
d
♦
C j