20140900 Ver 1_401 Application_20140814

F
August 18, 2014
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Asheville Regulatory Office
151 Patton Avenue, Room 208
Asheville, NC 28801 -5006
N.0 Division of Water Resources
401 & Buffer Permitting Unit
1650 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699 -1650
RECEIVED
AUG 19 204
DENR -LAND QUALITY
STORMWATER PERMITTING
Re: Nationwide No. 12 /General Water Quality Certification No. 3884 Approval
Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination
Barrier Road 100 kV Tap Transmission Line Project
Cabarrus and Rowan Counties, North Carolina
To Whom It May Concern:
HDR Engineering, Inc. of the Carolinas (HDR), on behalf of Duke Energy Carolinas, LLC (Duke
Energy), is submitting a preliminary jurisdictional determination and Pre - Construction Notification
(PCN) application for Section 404/401 approval through the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
( USACE) Nationwide Permit (NWP) 12 and N.C. Division of Water Resources (NCDWR) Water
Quality Certification (WQC) No. 3884 for construction activities associated with the proposed Barrier
Road 100KV Tap Transmission Line Project in Cabarrus and Rowan Counties (Figures 1 and 2).
The Project encompasses approximately 2.8 miles within a 68 -foot wide Duke Energy owned right -
of -way beginning near Chapman Farm Lane, where it will tie into Duke Energy's existing
transmission line and end at the proposed Barrier Road Retail Substation as shown in the enclosed
figures. Duke Energy is proposing to install the new 100kV transmission line including one switch
structure, 24 poles with wire, and a substation in order for added capacity. The areas investigated
are those that will be potentially affected by the construction of the Project. HDR's on -site
investigation included a delineation of jurisdictional waters of the U.S. in an approximately 23 -acre
Study Area and preliminary habitat survey for federally protected species.
Jurisdictional Waters of the U.S.
HDR reviewed the proposed alignment for jurisdictional waters of the U.S. under Section 404 of the
Clean Water Act. The alignment was examined according to the methodology described in the
USACE 1987 Wetland Delineation Manual, USACE Post- Rapanos guidance, the recent USACE
hdrinc.com
400 South Church Street Suites 900 & 1000. Charlotte, NC 28202 -2075
T 704 338 6700 F 704.338.6760

August 18, 2014
Page 2
Regional Supplement, and the NCOVVR|Guidance On-site reconnaissance, conducted mFebruary
2014, revealed that nine jurisdictional streams and ten jurisdictional wetlands are located within or
just outside mf the proposed alignment (Figure 3) Completed NCOVVR Stream Identification forms,
USACE Wetland Determination forms, and representative photographs are attached Table
provides e summary of the delineated features
Table 1. Summary mf Waters mfthe U.S.
Stream 1(sl)
(tributary to
35506
-80513
R3UB2
45 linear feet
non section 10
Dutch Buffalo
non-tidal
Stream 2 (s2)
0 linear feet
(tributary to
35506
-80513
R4UB2
(located outside of
non section 10
Dutch Buffalo
Study Area)
— non-tidal
Stream 3 (s3)
non section 10
(Dutch Buffalo
35506
-80513
R3UB2
125 linear feet
— non-tidal
Stream 4 (s4)
(tributary to
35505
-80512
R4LJB2
95 linear feet
non section 10
Dutch Buffalo
— non-tidal
Stream 5 (s5)
(tributary to
35501
-80510
None
70 linear feet
non-404
Dutch Buffalo
regulated
Stream 6 (s6)
(tributary to
35497
-80510
R31LJB2
75 linear feet
non section 10
Dutch Buffalo
— non-tidal
Stream 7 (s7)
(tributary to
35493
-80508
R4UB2
90 linear feet
non section 10
Dutch Buffalo
— non-tidal
Stream 8 (s8)
(tributary to
35490
-80504
R3UB1
70 linear feet
non section 10
Dutch Buffalo
— non-tidal
Stream 9 (s9)
(tributary to
35490
-80497
R3LJB1
150 linear feet
non section 10
Dutch Buffalo
— non-tidal
Stream 10
(slo)
non section 10
(tributary to
35487
-80486
R4UB2
75 linear feet
— non-tidal
Dutch Buffalo
Wetland 1 (wl)
35507
-80514
PSS1 B
0 31 acre
non section 10

August 18, 2014
Page 3
�� S 9:�
I—EM44 ber },
_ r
Cowartlin�`'
,, '�6 s�v
.� pig
Estimated�Amourit�df�
� a �
t
�Class,Rof
a :
i�,
�or�,fVamer
Laiitude
Longitude
�'�` �.m
� �7��
`• Class: �:
iAic�Resour� kin i
quat� ro�� be kin
,_ Aquatics �>
����
��$tud�Area�
a�Resource
– wetland
Wetland 2 (w2)
35 507
-80514
PFO1 B
0 03 acre
non section 10
– wetland
Wetland 3 (w3)
35 514
-80514
PFO1 C
0 08 acre
non section 10
– wetland
non section 10
Wetland 4 (w4)
35 502
-80510
PF01 B
0 02 acre
– wetland
Wetland 5 (w5)
35 502
-80510
PF01 C
0 02 acre
non section 10
– wetland
Wetland 6 (w6)
35 499
-80510
PFO1 C
0 07 acre
non section 10
– wetland
Wetland 7 (w7)
35 495
-80509
PFO1C
0 02 acre
non section 10
– wetland
Wetland 8 (w8)
35 490
-80503
PEM1 B
0 002 acre
non section 10
– wetland
Wetland 9 (w9)
35 490
-80503
PFO1 B
0 02 acre
non section 10
– wetland
Wetland 10
35 490
-80497
PF01 C
0 04 acre
non section 10
w10
– wetland
Impacts to Jurisdictional Waters
The proposed transmission line was aligned to avoid and minimize impacts to jurisdictional streams
and wetlands, where possible Construction equipment will utilize existing access roads where
accessible New access roads will use temporary bridges at each stream crossing No permanent
or temporary impacts to jurisdictional streams are anticipated
No permanent overhead utility structures or erosion and sediment control devices will be placed in
wetlands Temporary fill impacts to jurisdictional wetlands will consist of placing matting within the
20 -ft wide access road during construction Following construction, matting will be removed and
wetlands will be re- graded to their pre - construction contours and re- seeded with native herbaceous
vegetation Permanent impacts to wetlands will consist of mechanized and hand - clearing of
forested wetlands within the 68 -foot wide right -of -way Sediment and erosion control measures will
be employed prior to construction and inspected and maintained throughout the duration of the
project to protect water quality and aquatic habitat Table 2 provides a summary of impacts to
jurisdictional waters

Augue l8.oO14
Page 4
Table 2. Wetland Un?psctm Summary
A-gency Correspondence
Cultural Resources
HDR reviewed the National Register of Historic Places (NRHP) GIS database and found no known
structures or historic districts located within a mile of the Project Area Correspondence (dated
August 4.2O14) was sent to the NC State Historic Preservation Office (8HPO)requesting
information on cultural resources that may be impacted by the proposed project No response from
SHPO has been received as of the date of this permit application and cover letter
3"
all
T-Temporary Fill
W1
Sheet 1
Wetland 1
0186
0001
—
Clearing
W2
Sheet 1
Wetland 2
P-Mechanized
N/A
0030
Clearing
W3
Sheet 1
Wetland 3
P-Mechanized
N/A
0089
Clearing
W4
Sheet 1
Wetland 4
P-Mechanized
N/A
0026
Clearing
W5
Sheet 1
Wetland 5
P-Mechanized
N/A
0025
Clearing
T-Temporary Fill
W6
Sheet 1
Wetland 6
0055
0016
—
Clearing
W7
Sheet 2
Wetland 7
P-Mechanized
N/A
0022
Clearing
W8
Sheet 2
Wetland 8
T-Temporary Fill
0001
N/A
W9
Sheet 2
Wetland 9
P-Mechanized
N/A
0018
Clearing
W10
Sheet 2
Wetland 10
P-Mechanized
N/A
0042
Clearing
Total:
0.242
0.269
A-gency Correspondence
Cultural Resources
HDR reviewed the National Register of Historic Places (NRHP) GIS database and found no known
structures or historic districts located within a mile of the Project Area Correspondence (dated
August 4.2O14) was sent to the NC State Historic Preservation Office (8HPO)requesting
information on cultural resources that may be impacted by the proposed project No response from
SHPO has been received as of the date of this permit application and cover letter

August 18, 2014
Page 5
Federally Protected Species
HDR obtained and reviewed a list of federally protected species for Cabarrus and Rowan Counties
from the U S Fish and Wildlife Service ( USFWS) website (http / /www fws qov /asheville), which was
last updated on December 26, 2012 HDR conducted an onsite visit and determined that the site
does not exhibit habitat for the Carolina heelsplifter (Lasm►gona decorata) which is federally listed
as endangered or the bald eagle (Hahaeetus leucocephalus) which is protected under the Bald and
Golden Eagle Protection Act However, the project area includes habitat suitable for Schweinitz's
sunflower (Hel►anthus schwe►n►tzu) listed as federally endangered and the Georgia aster
(Symphyotrichum georg►anum) which is a federal candidate species Species surveys will be
conducted for this species during the appropriate survey period HDR also reviewed the North
Carolina Natural Heritage Program ( NCNHP) Element Occurrence database and GIS layer
According to the NCNHP data, no federally protected species occur within one mile of the proposed
project Correspondence (August 12, 2014) was sent,to the USFWS requesting comments on any
possible issues that may emerge with respect to endangered species, migratory birds, or other
resources from the proposed construction activities To date, no response has been received, but
when a response is received we will forward it promptly
We are hereby requesting a preliminary jurisdictional determination for delineated waters of the
U S and authorization to construct the proposed Project under a Section 404 NWP 12 and Section
401 WQC No 3884 If you have any questions,or require additional information after your review of
the enclosed information, please contact me at (704) 973 -6878 or enc mularski(a)-hdnnc com
Respectfully,
HDR Engineering, Inc of the Carolinas
Eric Mularski, PWS
Environmental Scientist
Attachments Agent Authorization Form
Figure 1 Project Location
Figure 2 U -S Geological Survey Quadrangle
Figure 3 Jurisdictional Waters (Sheets 1 through 6)
Figure 4 NRCS Sods Survey
Pre - Construction Notification
Project Plans
Request for Preliminary Jurisdiction Determination Form
NCDWR Stream Identification Forms
USACE Wetland Data Forms
Project Photographs
cc Mr James Shapard — Duke Energy
Mr William Metcalfe, PWS — Duke Energy

AGENT AUTHORIZATION FORM
I, Will Metcalfe, representing the Duke Energy Carolinas, LLC, hereby certify that I have authorized Eric Mularski,
representing HDR Engineering, Inc. of the Carolinas, to act on my behalf and take all actions necessary to the processing
and issuance of the Section 4041401 permits associated with the Barrier Road 100KV Tap Transmission Line Project located
in Cabarrus and Rowan Counties, North Carolina.
We hereby certify that the information submitted in this application is true and accurate to the best of our knowledge.
Will Metcalfe
Applicants Name
Applicants i latwe
8/8/2014
Eric Mularski
Agent's Name
Agent's Signature
8/8/2014
Date
hdrinc.com
400 South Church Street Suites 900 &1000, Charlotte, NC 28202 -2075
T 704.338.6700 F 704.338.6760

O� O� W A
v
Office Use Only:
Corps action ID no.
DWQ project no.
Form Version 1.3 Dec 10 2008
Page 1 of 14
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
Pre - Construction Notification (PCN) Form
A.
Applicant Information
1.
Processing
1 a. Type(s) of approval sought from the
Corps:
FE Section 404 Permit ❑Section 10 Permit
1b. Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number: 12 or General Permit (GP) number:
1c.
Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps?
❑ Yes ® No
1 d.
Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply):
® 401 Water Quality Certification — Regular ❑ Non -404 Jurisdictional General Permit
❑ 401 Water Quality Certification — Express ❑ Riparian Buffer Authorization
1e.
Is this notification solely for the record
because written approval is not required?
For the record only for DWQ 401
Certification:
❑ Yes ® No
For the record only for Corps Permit:
❑ Yes ® No
1f.
Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for mitigation
of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank or in -lieu
fee program.
❑ Yes ® No
1g.
Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties. If yes, answer 1h
below.
❑ Yes ® No
1h.
Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)?
❑ Yes ® No
2.
Project Information
2a.
Name of project:
Duke Energy Barrier Road 100 kV Tap Transmission Line
2b. County:
Cabarrus and Rowan
2c.
Nearest municipality / town:
Mt. Pleasant / Concord
2d.
Subdivision name:
N/A
2e.
NCDOT only, T.I.P. or state
project no:
N/A RE
3.
Owner Information 1� 2014
3a.
Name(s) on Recorded Deed:
See attached D QUALITY
3b.
Deed Book and Page No.
STORMWATER PE
3c.
Responsible Party (for LLC if
applicable):
3d. Street address:
3e. City, state, zip:
3f.
Telephone no.:
3g.
Fax no.:
3h.
Email address:
Page 1 of 14
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

4.
Applicant Information (if different from owner)
4a
Applicant is
❑ Agent ® Other, specify Utility
4b
Name
William Metcalfe, PWS
4c
Business name
(if applicable)
Duke Energy Carolinas, LLC
4d
Street address
526 South Church Street
4e
City, state, zip
Charlotte, NC 28202
4f
Telephone no
980 373 2050
4g
Fax no
704 620 9170
4h
Email address
William Metcalfe(a)duke- energy com
5.
Agent/Consultant Information (if applicable)
5a
Name
Eric Mularski, PWS
5b
Business name
(if applicable)
HDR Engineering, Inc of the Carolinas
5c
Street address
440 South Church Street, Suite 1000
5d
City, state, zip
Charlotte, NC 28202
5e
Telephone no
704 973 6878
'
Fax no
704 338 6760
5g
Email address
Eric mularski(adnnc com
Page 2 of 14

B.
Project Information and Prior Project History
1.
Property Identification
1a
Property identification no (tax PIN or parcel ID)
See attached
1 b
Site coordinates (in decimal degrees)
Latitude 34 487938 Longitude - 80 54016
(DD DDDDDD) ( -DD DDDDDD)
1 c
Property size
23 acres
2.
Surface Waters
2a
Name of nearest body of water (stream, river, etc ) to
proposed project
Dutch Buffalo Creek and Unnamed tributaries to Dutch
Buffalo Creek
2b
Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water
Dutch Buffalo Creek - WS -II, HQW
2c
River basin map is available at
http / /h2o enr state nc us /adman /maps/
Yadkin -Pee Dee DWQ Subbasm 03 -07 -12
Page 3 of 14
PCN Form — Version 1 3 December 10, 2008 Version

3. Project Description
3a Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this
application
According to aerial imagery and recent onsite visits, the Project area and surrounding properties are classified as
cultivated, managed herbaceous cover, and mixed upland hardwoods
3b List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property
Approximately 0 61 acres (ac ) of wetlands were identified and delineated including
- 0 31 ac of Wetland 1
- 0 03 ac of Wetland 2
- 0 08 ac of Wetland 3
- 0 02 ac of Wetland 4
- 0 02 ac of Wetland 5
- 0 07 ac of Wetland 6
- 0 02 ac of Wetland 7
- 0 002 ac of Wetland 8
- 0 02 ac of Wetland 9
- 0 04 ac of Wetland 10
3c List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property
Approximately 260 linear feet (If) of intermittent stream and approximately 465 If of perennial stream were identified within
or near by the proposed Project including
- 45 If of perennial Stream 1 (UT to Dutch Buffalo Creek)
- 0 If of intermittent Stream 2 (UT to Dutch Buffalo Creek)
- 125 If of perennial Stream 3 (Dutch Buffalo Creek)
- 95 If of intermittent Stream 4 (UT to Dutch Buffalo Creek)
- 75 If of perennial Stream 6 (UT to Dutch Buffalo Creek)
- 90 If of intermittent Stream 7 (UT to Dutch Buffalo Creek)
- 70 If of perennial Stream 8 (UT to Dutch Buffalo Creek)
- 150 If of perennial Stream 9 (UT to Dutch Buffalo Creek)
- 75 If of intermittent Stream 10 (UT to Dutch Buffalo Creek)
3d Explain the purpose of the proposed project
Duke is proposing to install 2 8 miles of new 100kV transmission line to from an existing transmission tap point in
Rowan County to a proposed substation in Cabarrus County Duke Energy plans to install one switch structure, 24
poles with wire, and a substation in order for added capacity
3e Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used
The Project encompasses approximately 2 8 miles and a 68 -foot right -of -way beginning near Chapman Farm Lane,
where it will tie into Duke Energy's existing transmission line and end at the proposed Barrier Road Retail Substation
Duke is proposing to install the new 100kV transmission line including one switch structure, 24 poles with wire, and a
substation Type of equipment to be used will include backhoes concrete mixer trucks, cranes, excavators, and hauling
trucks
Page 4 of 14

4.
Jurisdictional Determinations
4a
Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the
Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property /
project (including all prior phases) in the past?
Comments
❑ Yes ® No ❑ Unknown
4b
If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination, what type
of determination was made?
❑ preliminary ❑ Final
4c
If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas?
Name (if known)
Agency /Consultant Company
Other
4d
If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation
5.
Project History
5a
Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for
this project (including all prior phases) in the past?
❑ Yes ® No ❑ Unknown
5b
If yes, explain in detail according to "help file" instructions
6.
Future Project Plans
6a
Is this a phased project?
❑ Yes ® No
6b
If yes, explain
Page 5 of 14

C. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
la Which sections were completed below for your project (check all that apply)
® Wetlands ❑ Streams - tributaries ❑ Buffers
❑ Open Waters ❑ Pond Construction
2. Wetland Impacts
If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted
2a
2b
2c
2d
2e
2f
Wetland impact
Type of jurisdiction
number —
Type of impact
Type of wetland
Forested
(Corps - 404, 10
Area of impact
Permanent (P) or
(if known)
DWQ — non -404, other)
(acres)
Temporary T
T - Temporary Fill
El Yes
® Corps
T- 0 186
W1 ®P ®T
P- Mechanized
Scrub /shrub
0 N
El DWQ
P- 0 001
Clearing
W2 ®P ❑ T
P - Mechanized
Forested
® Yes
® Corps
P- 0 030
Clearing
❑ No
❑ DWQ
W3 ®P ❑ T
P - Mechanized
Forested
® Yes
® Corps
P- 0 089
Clearing
❑ No
❑ DWQ
W4 ®P ❑ T
P - Mechanized
Forested
® Yes
® Corps
P- 0 026
Clearing
❑ No
❑ DWQ
W5 ®P ❑ T
P- Mechanized
Forested
® Yes
® Corps
P- 0 025
Clearing
❑ No
❑ DWQ
W6 ®P ❑ T
T - Temporary Fill
P - Mechanized
Forested
® Yes
® Corps
T- 0 055
Clearing
El No
[:1 DWQ
P- 0 016
W7 ®P ❑ T
P - Mechanized
Forested
® Yes
® Corps
P- 0 022
Clearing
❑ No
[:1 DWQ
W8 ®P ❑ T
P — Temporary Fill
Emergent
❑ Yes
El No
® Corps
El DWQ
T- 0 001
W9 ®P ❑ T
P - Mechanized
Forested
® Yes
® Corps
P - 0 018
Clearing
El No
E] DWQ
W10 ®P ❑ T
P - Mechanized
Clearing
Forested
® Yes
[_1 No
® Corps
El DWQ
P - 0 042
2g. Total wetland impacts
T -0.242
P -0.269
2h Comments Temporary fill impacts to jurisdictional wetlands will consist of placing matting within the temporary
construction 20 -ft wide access road Following construction, matting will be removed and wetlands will be re- graded to
their pre - construction contours and re- seeded with native herbaceous vegetation Permanent impacts to wetlands will
consist of mechanized clearing of forested wetlands within the 68 -foot wide right -of -way
Page 6 of 14

3. Stream Impacts
If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this
question for all stream sites impacted
3a
3b
3c
3d
3e
3f
3g
Stream impact
Type of impact
Stream name
Perennial
Type of jurisdiction
Average
Impact
number -
(PER) or
(Corps - 404, 10
stream
length
Permanent (P) or
intermittent
DWQ — non -404,
width
(linear
Temporary (T)
(INT)?
other)
(feet)
feet)
S1 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ PER
❑ Corps
❑ INT
❑ DWQ
S2 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ PER
❑ Corps
❑ INT
❑ DWQ
S3 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ PER
❑ Corps
❑ INT
❑ DWQ
S4 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ PER
❑ Corps
❑ INT
❑ DWQ
S5 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ PER
❑ Corps
❑ INT
❑ DWQ
S6 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ PER
❑ Corps
❑ INT
❑ DWQ
3h Total stream and tributary impacts
31 Comments Temporary bridges will be placed over all stream crossings No permanent or temporary impacts are
anticipated
4. Open Water Impacts
If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of
the U S then individually list all open water impacts below
4a
4b
4c
4d
4e
Open water
Name of waterbody
impact number —
(if applicable)
Type of impact
Waterbody type
Area of impact (acres)
Permanent (P) or
Temporary T
01 ❑P ❑T
02 ❑P ❑T
03 ❑P ❑T
04 ❑P ❑T
4f. Total open water impacts
0
4g Comments
5. Pond or Lake Construction
If pond or lake construction proposed, then complete the chart below
5a
5b
5c
5d
5e
Wetland Impacts (acres)
Stream Impacts (feet)
Upland
Pond ID
Proposed use or purpose
(acres)
number
of pond
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
Flooded
P1
P2
5f. Total
0
5g Comments
5h Is a dam high hazard permit required
❑ Yes No If yes, permit ID no
Page 7 of 14

51 Expected pond surface area (acres)
5j Size of pond watershed (acres)
5k Method of construction
6. Buffer Impacts (for DWQ)
If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below
If yes, then individually list all buffer impacts
below If any impacts require mitigation, then
you MUST fill out Section D of this form
6a.
❑ Neuse
❑ Tar - Pamlico ❑ Other
Project is in which protected basin?
❑ Catawba
❑ Randleman
6b
6c
6d
6e
6f
6g
Buffer impact
number —
Reason
Buffer
Zone 1 impact
Zone 2 impact
Permanent (P) or
for
Stream name
mitigation
(square feet)
(square feet)
Temporary T
impact
required
B1 ❑P ❑T
F-1 Yes
❑ No
B2 ❑P ❑T
El Yes
❑ No
B3 ❑P ❑T
El Yes
❑ No
6h Total buffer impacts
0
61 Comments Not a buffered basin
Page 8 of 14

D. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
la Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project
The proposed transmission line was aligned to avoid and minimize impacts to jurisdictional streams and wetlands No
overhead utility structures or erosion and sediment control devices will be placed in wetlands Construction equipment
will utilize existing access roads where accessible Timber matting will be placed in wetland areas during construction
New access roads will use temporary bridges at each stream crossings
b Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques
New access roads will use temporary bridges from upland to upland at each stream crossings Disturbed wetland areas
will be returned to pre - construction contours and re- seeded with native herbaceous species following construction
Sediment and erosion control measures will be employed prior to construction and inspected and maintained
throughout the duration of the project to protect water quality and aquatic habitat
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for
impacts to Waters of the U S or Waters of the State?
❑ Yes ® No
2b If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply)
❑ DWQ ❑ Corps
2c If yes, which mitigation option will be used for this
project?
❑ Mitigation bank
El Payment to in -lieu fee program
❑ Permittee Responsible Mitigation
3. Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank
3a Name of Mitigation Bank
3b Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter)
Type
Quantity
3c Comments
4. Complete if Making a Payment to In -lieu Fee Program
4a Approval letter from in -lieu fee program is attached
❑ Yes
4b Stream mitigation requested
linear feet
4c If using stream mitigation, stream temperature
❑ warm ❑ cool ❑cold
4d Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only)
square feet
4e Riparian wetland mitigation requested
acres
4f Non - riparian wetland mitigation requested
acres
4g Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested
acres
4h Comments
Page 9 of 14
PCN Form — Version 1 3 December 10, 2008 Version

5. Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
5a If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan
6. Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) — required by DWQ
6a Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires
buffer mitigation? If yes, you will have to fill out this entire form — please
contact the State for more information
❑ Yes ® No
6b If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation Calculate the
amount of mitigation required
Zone
6c
Reason for impact
6d
Total impact
(square feet)
Multiplier
6e
Required mitigation
(square feet)
Zone 1
3 (2 for Catawba)
Zone 2
1 5
6f Total buffer mitigation required:
6g If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e g , payment to private mitigation bank,
permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in -lieu fee fund)
6h Comments
Page 10 of 14

E.
Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ)
1.
Diffuse Flow Plan
1 a
Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified
❑ Yes ® No
within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
lb
If yes, then is a diffuse flow plan included? If no, explain why
❑ Yes ❑ No
Comments
2.
Stormwater Management Plan
2a
What is the overall percent imperviousness of this project?
0%
2b
Does this project require a Stormwater Management Plan?
❑ Yes ® No
2c
If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why The project will not be creating
impervious surfaces
2d
If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan, then provide a brief, narrative
description of the plan
❑ Certified Local Government
2e
Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan?
❑ DWQ Stormwater Program
❑ DWQ 401 Unit
3.
Certified Local Government Stormwater Review
3a
In which local government's jurisdiction is this project?
❑ Phase II
❑ NSW
3b
Which of the following locally - implemented stormwater management programs
❑ USMP
apply (check all that apply)
❑ Water Supply Watershed
❑ Other
3c Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
❑ Yes ❑ No
attached?
4.
DWQ Stormwater Program Review
❑ Coastal counties
❑ HQW
4a
Which of the following state - implemented stormwater management programs apply
❑ ORW
(check all that apply)
❑ Session Law 2006 -246
❑ Other
4b
Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
❑ Yes ❑ No
attached?
5.
DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review
5a
Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements?
❑ Yes ❑ No
5b
Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met?
❑ Yes ❑ No
Page 11 of 14
PCN Form — Version 1 3 December 10, 2008 Version

F.
Supplementary Information
1.
Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement)
la
Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal /state /local) funds or the
❑ Yes ® No
use of public (federal /state) land?
l 1p
If you answered "yes" to the above, does the protect require preparation of an
environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State
❑ Yes ❑ No
(North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
1 c
If you answered "yes" to the above, has the document review been finalized by the
State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval
letter )
❑ Yes ❑ No
Comments
2.
Violations (DWQ Requirement)
2a
Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H 0500), Isolated
Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H 1300), DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards,
❑ Yes ® No
or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B 0200)?
2b
Is this an after - the -fact permit application?
❑ Yes ® No
2c
If you answered "yes" to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s)
3.
Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement)
3a
Will this protect (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in
❑ Yes ® No
additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?
3b
If you answered "yes' to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the
most recent DWQ policy If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description
N/A
4.
Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement)
4a
Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non - discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from
the proposed protect, or available capacity of the subject facility
N/A
Page 12 of 14
PCN Form — Version 1 3 December 10, 2008 Version

5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or
® Yes ❑ No
habitat?
5b Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act
® Yes ❑ No
impacts?
❑ Raleigh
5c If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted
® Asheville
5d What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical
Habitat?
HDR obtained and reviewed a list of federally protected species for Cabarrus and Rowan Counties from the USFWS website
(http / /www fws qov /raleigh /species /cntylist/rowan html and http / /www fws qov /raleigh /species /cntylist/cabarrus html), which
were last updated on December 26, 2012 HDR conducted an onsite visit and determined that the site does not exhibit habitat
for the Carolina heelsplitter (Lasmigona decorata) which is federally listed as endangered or the bald eagle (Hahaeetus
leucocephalus) which is protected under the Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act However, the project area includes
habitat suitable for Schweirntz's sunflower (Hehanthus schwernitzn) listed as federally endangered and the Georgia aster
(Symphyotnchum georg►anum) which is a federal candidate species HDR also reviewed the North Carolina Natural Heritage
Program ( NCNHP) Element Occurrence database and GIS layer According to the NCNHP data, no federally protected
species occur within one mile of the proposed project Correspondence (August 12, 2014) was sent to the USFWS requesting
comments on any possible issues that may emerge with respect to endangered species, migratory birds, or other resources
from the proposed construction activities To date, no response has been received, but when a response is received we will
forward it promptly
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat?
❑ Yes ® No
6b What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat?
T. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal
governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation
❑ Yes ® No
status (e g , National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in
North Carolina history and archaeology)?
7b What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?
HDR reviewed the SHPO's Database online (http / /gis ncdcr gov /hpoweb) for historic resources in proximity to the project
area No properties listed on or as eligible for National Register of Historic Places were located nearby The nearest
resource to the project area is the Pless Farm (CA0523) which is noted as a Study List (SL) property and is 0 3 mile from
the project Three additional resources noted as SO in the database are a Farm (CA0392), the Sides Carter House
(RW 1399), and the Weaver Log House (CA0599) which are 0 39, 0 33, and 0 60 mi respectively from the project area
The project is not anticipated to impact any historic or archaeological resources Correspondence (dated August 4,
2014) was sent to the NC SHPO requesting comments on any possible issues that may emerge with respect to historic or
archaeological resources from the proposed construction activities To date, no response has been received, but when a
response is received we will forward it promptly
Page 13 of 14

8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a Will this project occur in a FEMA- designated 100 -year floodplaln?
® Yes ❑ No
8b If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements The Project partially occurs in the floodplaln of Dutch Buffalo
Creek The project will only temporarily impact the existing floodplaln
8c What source(s) did you use to make the floodplaln determination? NC Flood Maps
Enc Mularski
8/18/2014
Applicant/Agent's Printed Name
Date
Applicant/Agent's Signature
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant
is provided
Page 14 of 14

O
1
N
a
n
0
d
A
C
0.11
D4k
+a
J
Cr
F�2
I;{
a
r
a
c
`c c
b
C
C.1STE jt52
sa:cr f.
�a
�r
U
U
c
m
4
2
Q
2
n
Q
c'
f�
R �
W
a
RECEIVED
eIIG192014
Sources: Esri, HERE, DeLorme, 'rw^ � AiN P orp.,
NRCAN, Esri Japan, METI, Esri , ���d),
TomTom, Mapmylndia, © OpenStreetMap contributors, and the GIS User
Community
Project Location
Figure 1
Duke Energy I Barrier Road 100 W Tap Transmission Line Project I Section 4041401

.'.. r
�f t0 .� h
\� 11 J � l.�i•• � i '
-
t Project Corridor '�
4
Row CO ,
CABA _ N CO
_WA
/ i -� CABARRUS CO —` r
V
I
- -� 744 +-
ie
�' � i .! I ��„`, ; • raj / C
d
fl 0 ♦i C G�
t tk
r-
r
6�J
- � m
1 inch = 2,000 feet ✓A + t�. -
0 1,000 2,000 4,000''�`� •ate �.
Feet ?Copynght;©:2013 Nat Geographic Society;; i -cubed
FN
USGS Quadrangles
Figure 2
Duke Energy i Barrier Road 100 kV Tap Transmission Line Project I Section 404/401

uodaa lelu@wUO11AU3 166jau3 aNnp I loalad auil uogssiwsueil aui0 del Al 00l Pena iaweg
z
w =�
o a
- suortn]oS ,CuvyVI ANVdWOD 3NO
art T

uodab IeluawuOiinu3 I ,S6 au3 alna I I*OJd auil uassiwsueil awl del AM ON Pena Jaweg
suoYnloS ,fuvyv ANVdWOD 8NO
C9 �o Z aaa4S) £ a�nBi j
AananS sialeM leuoil:oipsianp YCH

uodaa IejUawllollAU3I 66iau3 aXn4 I pafoid auil uassiwsueil auil del AA M Pena iaweg W `"" —I —
N s-uo!injoS ,fuvW ANVdWOD 3A10
(9 )a £ 3894S) £ aan6ij CY d v r u

liodad ieluawuainu3 I A6iau3 aIn0 I Ioalad auil uogssiusueil auil del AX 001 Peoa iaweg
(9 10 b 3094S) £ ain6ij
�suoynIoS "ONI ANVdWOD 9NIO
`
Raning sialeM leuoii�ipsianr L

ILIIEN
m

j
x
eaa y �pr�j apislno M
�wua ad s i r xa'�
l!a!y o
iz#
- —f� eaay, pnjS1apisjnoG�
�sanui�uo6 p.ks - -:
/�
OLIS
ry � 1

yodaa IeIuawuainu31 F6J9u3 ayna I MOM au!-1 uoassiwsuejl auil del AN ool PeoH raweg
_ „suor�n�os CuVN IAN V JWOD IN
q a�n6i�
Of
A Minn^ iipmnv mip Amnnn sn llpffpn Ini AAAjne seine an%jKi w

nSn
+ + n
am-
��r
y V l y
� I I
S S S
y~j V1 VI
m m m m m m m m
00000000
�Nn�mmnm
W W W X W
N x X
V V V V V O V r
rnmmmaarn
y^ X X X X X X X
W W W W W W W W
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
,z Z Z 2 Z Z 2 Z
W W W W W W W W
ZZZZZZZZZ
o
x77777777
W Y .. N N
Y Y Y X X
�J SSaSSSSB�
p< Q t« 4< 6 W W
WZDOOOOOOOZI
= -a ¢rc¢ aK aKya KK KK Ryn y�
O¢ QQ G «G<�Wl~dl
U 0 m m m m m m m m 0
Z
Q
� O��NnVN�onm..N
uuaaanaaaaoo
= a4
-
v,
s 9
W o
W..- C, Lr
U'--j
z w
LIJ
-A
Q w�
W $$
O
co
n
i
fi
-A
F
W $$
h
UJ
8
she L�LJ esa
Q3
g$°
•
W wg
�
x
� .
O
y
I
I
g
d
5
y
_ � R
g= 6Ug
co i$2$
s
Kc ..s-
n
i
fi
-A
F
_
V
x
R
/
•
O
x
� .
O
y
I
I
g
d
5
y
- I
/ � I
s
z
v� -
t�
Y
u
R
x
� .
y
I
I
- I
/ � I
s
z
v� -
t�
Y
u
ti
r^r�ti,
�J
C�
V
[V
D
- I
/ � I
r /
ti
r^r�ti,
�J
C�
V
[V
D

A
S 3 m >ACaDLn > ;°nmsnyy
n 6 u pm VNl rn�lz °NmVyZiA9 yam
CL 2m. °cc[ Jo%D�
i i T Y a g 8 T 1pil l^om�4�Hyc�i ° >NUOI
�I i�R li a o N $ $ f E4 4 "> ap N ;mo mi°•>�x'zin9 ° <Om LA
ZAOnm�uu'i�Nvr"i2o
m�c oco g�y"gs <>ypg
�I = M M Y M1 4 o I^p�C Z1A�mz�l�Vy��p
_ ^ u 'Y o °m z%vvmi p��DO�ti p 553
- °
mymioFzy'8r
n °�4o <cilznzm�siN
OO=J.5j. ZZSg
1`�ary z� >Acggc.�n<
jAE ?i $ ny�y 4�v`izFiy�mr.I lr/=/��11z���CZ
'�
65 zm A m -z
K F cN_fi zm� i ;zzyl^m
�Izi �$�cm{4ojorr
p SS>5t
K~ "1 moZ AZ p�~O O�DZON�
zc
s
y —a 06W $�
sr
te
wa
s
�g
s-
ILi Y • N _
z
1���y s{ 8 • m O
°c_ A A r ° -8
V rS �S •w tT _ �• w w F m� I C, in u o u i
^o�o b �z 5 4
o
'U • T° Y w> J cg�QA u N
• c n g S �t8'" A. SS !S n F
m
d �os?z � Oylmil
pp 54
39 y pp g �o< o 9
b o o c m w N • a G i L d >� �[` �F�A m m - °° �$ $ $
o Y _ Y v O ? C Zopl N6 � - " TS �' ?O XIn
�~ wQti� s� i i > °z
OX FD FO FD FD Fo
ti
E
F
a u w w
Ar
Q nQ �'� czi zF zr1.OZL'm �z° vp Zmo� Li '% t, 9N lrc°I i
Q Epp rF ��v i z°cH Sl °va ^�'�i- ;A nn� m� A v� n ppm
C�a'I Z�m� m °gym§ ommm�xcsr �r7. z8° amr o o70 �Z �lz 50
6�<zc ° m m��z o^z Nr^ mmF �� cr oz
m m A > m� nq° m o nvl LLPyB n o� z n I^o -
`> �rili S Q x °mZ Cm az°rmmnzn nAZrn° ° ^o'^ N � mNZ i �i%li m 90
vv��N �ti r^mo_rAn (�� zmg�Z OO C� LQVn ��p 's r°rmn =z ;a� s A5i �imlp^oln n�
i° z m °; ;jam oz a3 i� °n^I ivy ;onm�n° m=s o ° If $fin n4 a
i m �$� zoo m9 u°zFiiYz°v�iJ mB m °� g < m "zli° r57. °O -�y� °e;
ilz y� 2 Mo mom R zA° o wmc <9 mm mcc
y y m Y > °v m�^mo5Fy $rOc c° •z �m a n,orp� x p
�° DZVI O_; y n0 Vl 1/I Q U O 4
p V�� � mGf mQ inQn ZV (j �5,',y�m• i, l n 1 <~ N Avi OR3.: �q
O $ B r��z�a z ° oocD GS Si o n z +I o °
' F r $� zO6 go n n C.J �8 ;0 omo D< zz to Pmm o o2 x.p g
g !�
0- FiA> O_; SOmLp U ;mo p0 I:im OD x Zµ C�yC Z
zm y �2Z ° v� Fryyn�I n °0 z
z o2_~ < < y rr�vpm 21 > -r^ y>> mC my m VyIA oVZr=rV1- y
a� Im �Oa 2my mSnCg>pxR o < =x10 ° m < m� ?pm �<
mm 9f/1 Zz N %n A.- m -a�§A t N I• �° °O ► Z 8
T K� Q 8 � m jF . F�AOgr� of aim z� u z ��ngpz
AAE�� zo om i vFm$pz
V zaS of ti> A 7N co' zyr" Afz-zog 6n C �P z �^ N yx0<'
In rr� yAF zF � VIO c=N°A = =iai�5!^ nn°j^ o o° zm rA I=.I z�O °rA' f
mz -2 Z < >symp
<° m °� �O umim�Z >4+ >�((3yllm °n oF0 <z yT LSO L^Np gnrpy
A ; gn pC2 z0 Cxpre �m m�C <���A ZZ2 ° °z 20 0 -m O pr mm
my[ym ; ooSoi 9L rn °zpyoA m m type° °� r; A�Np o0
r�l VI VI N y° < ><O!�Fj FZm O IAD Im/1 r.{ VI r2O -i
m N�ZZyZZ `iyyOy K; _ pyD
r� ( °. N O0umly NSD <°A
T 9z. V1 > >>. rrrr�I >yy T yU >y U r� N
z-i00 ��RNCAO °am 9rZ�1 DOU12f�mi� N ZOVI z00 SZ 0 py�ZO Om 2
��_ > A >o 1n m p JJJJJmCCCCC II/O/O� z °nq TZ rr9j SS >m m`` ~ UOI rI'I+y O>
;-N aaF 8H L�iiN 2� ain yln> -F .y < my� > mN � �nl � I Z
N$ mm ti 0 0p2 0y AI'rq �y zr�n_ 20�y o
I m� sod CJ��NnFN o z p >SS�sm rv�yz'�N v_=� ° °M*F' oz� �a z
I�ID ;mzm oti om AO �CR� cl ppy D�D rlm ntn > Zcq -m Ac
m rBr�� rm�� in T >O�NO9zil�j�m >>A N} -ro+� �r�,Z _m� z o�'°� z
O +oz my p�; A oop>, °A me r av CZ2CZoL 1y*m 7Nm -0 ; OA mZ
�� am Z~ < T mm° rm�° Fim °fplAytZll °VIZCf�On AfN�I m�0 ym=ON OUI2 ;O
4 ,> �r^ mm;L B �Z �n ;loran ~VN O iia DOOM CZ2� yZ
`-V § vs <g mL zzroo m� °z ° °_z�mr�m a� zp -pzC� Imnc °rg �m
_ O mN nnn C� my O< mO Cho ° -O O
maN 7� OU� rC 3mp (y�JaVyIA UIO aEoN v Am<r<� yz �± >ry�k: nr^A
U�$ 7C Pv n> „1Nr� mIA °C� Q�Z °9m <^'r�10 N yNVIAm m 2= 'I n
Yager a s � i � � ;� mmGm 4 �i o� mq i��naa oo zm
xg� Mrn S;

r*#
i
o
a
a:
c w
a v
M W I
M I GoSp
°�aoWe)
�o
wW°o°m ^�z
2OJm Y7 S
aaoa�a 33 ` :� F-
,< z
j J
W9 ~ U
•�•• m M
•��•/ N
�• ^ (x
w p
'��• Ora On �)oo
n0 I Go
�••••/ a z< a a O G N
mv� o o z
Q U WQ°j
�
i JimoR Q�Cx f a o a w
Fc°o�w
X Of u I—
o
v1 _ n o a
o• O °r`rnUZ Q
+,r 236
I cl �
a"f7ir'zw 'at Cc) m
V)
UI \
I
Ln
n �
r, a
i♦
i` z %
rr,I 03 U ♦I i �C
a O -♦
wa ww IC'1 1 ♦i z It
Q Z In 07 Z Ir i I a
xa� w_ 1,
1 3 1
Q� 0 Z ■ C Z m
a- D V)
Q- _j 0 OOD;ppl Q o Z a N n� rn Go m
��• { C a <ma�mvoo
\\ Ji= �J 1 O�y, -ZO
\\ w w °; $ 3
`\ >i w `I
v�
In
o
\ ■ J Q N 1
O O N �� ■ Iw 0 z' r
O _►. AN F
�.R�-'f
cr on S ES
w Imo 'Se� ��
nJ� ,
No J ('� �, v ♦ JJII
�fn z U ,\ ! raj *�C •t =-
dwao °a4 %� 1
WQ O 1
a o o
M w
4 ♦ ♦mo
O gLL� a w k
J
J
Z Nrnuo ♦•�
Nw a n o 1
WOio QJ amg °� 1
N�U� �d FQ- ^e�aZ,.
I m2n ; +1O^ o
F-� < N oZw
R/W LIMIT]
• - % •,
A N B K RDITE 230Y
3 •O� r - N0. 501 -6 -6
N ■
LINE _
I INDEX 1W158
3 _
/" REF. DWG. N0. 000325 76780 do 100
_ w
7>^� r
' ���p• R/W LIMIT idc� ---
p . - �I�
AO N �n
Z IY
0
• IJ.I
r1Q--
o jK
N d
I/i
ce
�L W "s
'W
CM
�s
a u� � � � g
= �•
4 O O
I^n$
o
I �
I I 6-
w
O O O
i
u
ry
z
Z
n
I I °
o
• '
�ggitgg?. b,�d bo 0 0 �
�
F
ONH
U °fOM�I 0)C,
O
w
noCc!
O
3 3 3
ci
LUSo Z N
\ �.__
• 1 w a
•� i ¢.
t I I I
9. 8's o
M W I
M I GoSp
°�aoWe)
�o
wW°o°m ^�z
2OJm Y7 S
aaoa�a 33 ` :� F-
,< z
j J
W9 ~ U
•�•• m M
•��•/ N
�• ^ (x
w p
'��• Ora On �)oo
n0 I Go
�••••/ a z< a a O G N
mv� o o z
Q U WQ°j
�
i JimoR Q�Cx f a o a w
Fc°o�w
X Of u I—
o
v1 _ n o a
o• O °r`rnUZ Q
+,r 236
I cl �
a"f7ir'zw 'at Cc) m
V)
UI \
I
Ln
n �
r, a
i♦
i` z %
rr,I 03 U ♦I i �C
a O -♦
wa ww IC'1 1 ♦i z It
Q Z In 07 Z Ir i I a
xa� w_ 1,
1 3 1
Q� 0 Z ■ C Z m
a- D V)
Q- _j 0 OOD;ppl Q o Z a N n� rn Go m
��• { C a <ma�mvoo
\\ Ji= �J 1 O�y, -ZO
\\ w w °; $ 3
`\ >i w `I
v�
In
o
\ ■ J Q N 1
O O N �� ■ Iw 0 z' r
O _►. AN F
�.R�-'f
cr on S ES
w Imo 'Se� ��
nJ� ,
No J ('� �, v ♦ JJII
�fn z U ,\ ! raj *�C •t =-
dwao °a4 %� 1
WQ O 1
a o o
M w
4 ♦ ♦mo
O gLL� a w k
J
J
Z Nrnuo ♦•�
Nw a n o 1
WOio QJ amg °� 1
N�U� �d FQ- ^e�aZ,.
I m2n ; +1O^ o
F-� < N oZw
R/W LIMIT]
• - % •,
A N B K RDITE 230Y
3 •O� r - N0. 501 -6 -6
N ■
LINE _
I INDEX 1W158
3 _
/" REF. DWG. N0. 000325 76780 do 100
_ w
7>^� r
' ���p• R/W LIMIT idc� ---
p . - �I�
AO N �n
Z IY
0
• IJ.I
r1Q--
o jK
1-4
I/i
ce
�L W "s
'W
CM
�s
�
u
W
�°
�Za
y
w
O O O
c
u
=Vm
N o
z
z
Z
n
I I °
o
• '
Z
- w Q
�
F
ONH
U °fOM�I 0)C,
O
w
N
O
3 3 3
ci
LUSo Z N
ri
b
0
• IJ.I
r1Q--
o jK
0
W
I/i
ce
�L W "s
ciN
�s
�
u
W
�°
�Za
y
w
f. i 411
^ c�M
=Vm
N o
z
WAN
• '
Z
- w Q
N J
U
a Z
CO
M�
" J
(o
` J
a
Q O
3
O
O
C�
C�
q
w
Q4
Qq
0
• IJ.I
r1Q--
F
Mai ►nNR{ /Y �//,
-j
roq ewti a`� >
I/i
_w
� ��Aha[Y/Sj J7S J lL
L
a y
main
f. i 411
^ c�M
NwyN
A
• '
QOU�e
W <
�m
N J
U
a Z
U °fOM�I 0)C,
O
w
o -o
C ZN ^jo
�j
ci
LUSo Z N
\ �.__
• 1 w a
ds •1
QZi d� In
9. 8's o
�LLOtia
� i o a
1�
o w m
it O
a U
Q vi O j, o
b
O1 :
N
I o
:
0 O 1 e O w
w J w
j
ooaN
0O wa
1 0
to
Ln D
°WN :
_ 3 xdH
2N
Wp m
1 d:0Z
-
Qi°
0-0D
= a - - CL _j 0
U \
f
I
� f
J 1
.n -
� w
Z6
o 1. 7
1� Z
f .
yza •
cr \
O
O
U
V) i
oUfo :
L Z 0 co
m Q
zw°
y10
LL
�� ♦ cN n N
I-U�O 1,,, 1� ^on I
a
n u7
0''7 ooa NM�rn
M� 1
01= y3ticio?oo
tD aO — ^F - ,n3aa�bo
:q*OI)u '
(D NJ�p�O ^N
` N^
+M�InO
~♦
-�
1l N Of pO
wF -m0ZJ5
n M z w d \ a.
e , 2 z
1. J
N i
<° a
R
np�nNbbBb�
■i
��
N {
darn
m
Jp O 06
6
• S
ly 0
■
Q m
In nzo,2 ; ZQ°. 40i e.
In
Q
u%Z
nan�mo°
1
°3an�-�
joo-
O
r
W W a0
d 2
Q N
LLJ
� r'�
•
> 1
♦
F-
L) w
Y/�j76 NOD
�,
•
NE CD�(1N�.
N►�t NN
SO
J
CO
M�
" J
(o
` J
a
Q O
3
O
O
C�
C�
q
w
Q4
Qq

(» m Z (n m � rr'�,� �'r c as& Au r. �
V as Na SP, D
to + .�.j� l r" roa ao
0 o N cw ����L�(� �,' _I ; `.A coa°r'oo cn
n °m�rn�cn dl` �+�< M< rror c
fMT M0 �•l• y _`�r "rte r I �
(7 C
CD. 0Zm 5'- � W
/• a Zc• vo t
d� /' / Nam+ °' n •
oaoaril*, _
•� / d�9 t o u 1 c�
Ln
J / /' [ ♦1 v�O�
�o ^
M
c 0
rDt �OFI rc')
► m
fTl mr 011D �- , •
O C fro •
0 O't''Amul cNitrn
O�t�'JANVI tN.1 iJ7t •.
0
'�,♦q,r.I'
P3 ;o 1
o. , o ' l �7 1
1 mom w.�
O Do
4 O •A.. f.� C w�
111 0 r .' r,�r,rr.r. ^,•�,_ t m Z tNp V
L4 N J /
Anne m = 0 r- o � � (" ` °' ♦.
o
w 1 -zivo onr� ' c -N
1 jrx Zo 0M z�11 ♦ OCO-u
OD3
\ 0 n [A Z 'U • C)
ZOX
c m O i
67o:oou r- -0 C) D > : p
Ox
�� mr inZ� -u ♦• ODD
4� m< X �m • O_ ! NZD
roD nD Mr • t`a vm
�J 7 m
o •, j ° vo nD i p �,� Ao
a n 1lb
} i ➢
l ' 696,AW
n
y ,ti 9 D o
•� r • M r--, i l O A
rm I '� i �% vmmo
q a�p. n�r l I _' r�uNM 1
C.
a D o G !
(A .t tom ocn ta��
ff It •
O 10 , iO
one •'�, O^
< v C�� ��� i 1 =
D i 6i �� 'r0 .-. m
M • O� s .• 1 In
•: �� 1
M >j ♦ �? ♦ r
° pp ,• ••• •r VOOn
mZ =m
r-Om Zr
74 •
m
c o°Vr'oc�iou � i
0 \1 �� r m o�wN�� w ♦:
1 I,
J Z ttoo
.00 00
Wl
x ►nE p• to - I ; �
ny aR° • 6
°'E
-> ° •
`O xa +°+x a. W
O �°'O N • \ xQ�t1L4�yyy ix> t ♦ Z
A o % ,�O • ~
oA n
D �r • '♦ oa
•
C J ° D 1• t
A t m ;i 1
Cb
M t ° Z
t
ff r� f iri 1 ^•,�ReTI�� � 1 I���1•
b m D V
OZZZ O m a Qa ;
v � N
A t„yr�' O O N O
T b 4
MORI 13 3%
�+ °_� F F
IT
Afts >� u ° �HFi n °
ioz $
o 4 %r 539
gN8 rn� nm
s g� $ s ��

OQ i
y
y O o a
W e
R"a
s�
p F �N G
�m��il 1 i ��� j$��• ■�Y a=i
J
f j
in
in
o
N C
V)
a
� o
I'
¢
co
Wv
000'OZL
�r
y
10
Rug
g�
m U
^yUa
i
o
=
n c6
i1�a
O
0
mol. Um1 Y01 I.1
oo- sc.cel Yu
Ji798 77C rn
aNrmx
Vj m
W
ai
N 0 N
D o
L)
;
000 oc4 '
i�
W
,1
J
C
W
N C
V)
a
In
Y LU
¢
co
C7
000'OZL
�r
�
10
Rug
g�
d
W
� N
C VI
o
=
i1�a
O
0
1
�D
CY
zQ
U)
L-
_ • � H i
• O J � �t
: Q D _W
• O U LL �1
1.
W Z
• Nit aD0
M cr 00 Lp C7 i'
M
F
+ Ol lh L
u7 :t (D O
a� NZL•la it
i
c ,
r ¢
a = ° �
° ^
°�� D
tP 1
a o,
n p
17 oON'j q0 �C
Win uOi ol`o =o �.0 }
Jm
"'P o Z s�
Ir Q
CL
%11,
a
¢
a
ago'
rn
a
Inflow
oat-
irU
J W m
Q J
a�
...............................
0
3 W
CD
Q� J V)
r d
G�P
1 V�
i 1
i 1
150 VW` •
1
• 1
1
sit
D Z
o a�
N ---.) LL
ar w
LU r-+ z
ON
oer
Y LU
co
a�
UN
Y
�
10
Rug
g�
d
W
� N
C VI
o
=
U
IA
ON
wW
Y LU
ZD
UN
D z
Z r
`\
10
Rug
0 W
i1�a
O
0
ai
N 0 N
<
O
-fi
J i
OU Z
O AND
w ./
M.
o
000'69< W M M M W ♦• ♦�•♦ ♦•
+ I'S ♦4
U�zw0. •,,��,,•
0
O Q K Z N h^
W •••• m�WgNO11+Ln
� °� Q I � t1•• nQav~iaam�l
Q AI n m
••• N]UQNaN O
L/ N
W ` O U W J m n
O W p< m 0
• W a W m a Z-
o a
F U �O <Ya�o ��
Zz co • a o
F- O m
00%< LD O 0 J �y (/V• ,111".
pI F \ SC2
a N((n - w U •
•
000, +O(�o �•
•
os� a�Nzwa ?'
m
�D9� ♦ � i � OOO;OeL n
1 ♦: i ^ v]�N
L.L n
f i num
O m m
¢ r�
of ao<
-z
Wam
oao
<r
a
o°
°o
p, e�
� W �
^z*
Iwo
n
Y ,n'6 a
' J m
O JZm
Sao
a
r: > (L
IC X`• _j w
vLL
n N
o o G m
w*w o ;
.n o:a'mnw Lr)
fLo16:.
N Y Y D O
or < °^ z
Jed O�m 1O
u ooa g' I(nI o do ,
W
Q
>o
• j _w `:�
f V7
in I J
°o.. Q T-
o
N Fa
' v)
a 0 3: OWL
lr W i
1�
I 1;
1 ,
I
1 �
I I � oWa ii
n uju i i
1 7
Uxofo ;
N04.N113Nm you TA061' 339
00'9Ci1'yl YlC EN7IN3.p11 Q 11
'J
EN
vJ
O
0
CQ,
q
O
Q4
IS

s
C)
r)
Cbl
C)
O ) i�
$
Al
e
�l�l'y�) �J�e
•
....r,• O, OO
���:'�
V\���i M /�, •�` 'I'�Z ,�,�0�
�,i O�
- ,,.! \
--------------------
-- - - - - --
-- - - - - --
--
p •''�Q Gj �/ i .. Z
so
IoW
v
p 2 •C '�� i'rE� D 1 Y' � i Li i ''�
�O�oiV
m° �U �.na� y ^'ao :
Z
M� o fli •
c o
1 O
', V' ♦
1 � I '•• y �
; 02 a .'•' �L7 000
�
•y � � 2 ° a `'s
------ - - -
I i J /' ♦ 1 ° �2��
- - --
♦ '� �
�
- --
ny
• � s
l
b
CD
/ /
.c .o2m m C a
co
`tv0`o`Ofo
i
fs•��
o`oD o.c
n
OT C °14 0)
_`'"'�'�* tea__ - - - -- - - --
�°
-z, v
7
- - -- -
O y� .tip
/ ✓• OP
ca
'Y
,�
2C �(35
wR r�•A•W
yrAMAw
I�
"Oss
AtW�Wass
.,r'
n
V
y
O
o
F
u�Y
O
Aft'as
m °m
oz
a0
>oa
'� `� Fi M i s
'b '� yo mra3
>1
w
§
MID0
g°
-
aNO o
g
N
C
p
Qos 'O
rnC
vg
�rn
gZ
7 & 8Ng =:
e
�
N�

0 _Z
LLJ
0 of
vi r3
NW g
Z
"s
UJ
U.J
'
ko
w I t
C6 S
o o
YLJJ8�a
��ud
co
op
`
O W_
u `'$JQ drys a CCU
50a
$m
O
0.
jago,..�Y ? i
e—
w o w
a � -� '`
_ pJ
b
Z If1 �
L ado-
LO d
;a
\ ,n oob
J W m
O
Q
CL
♦ :� !n'• .... ........... .r♦..... .r•• •..
•
l o •;
O
3 w
o D
a '4
W Z_
NJ
W
s ti
:n 7
�Do
Lp Lf)
q
�
o
944
M K; U
011
a < Vo i % W Z
]V-.66 o N
n
�L Ci CL 111
/
4�
CL
7
co
cn
it
°o . r-- `
..••♦
♦
�
O
U LL O
0000
♦•�.
8 •
0 O
i•••
•
w N
d�dOOQ
N6 •
Sit
11%
• ♦ ♦.•
•
+t0�OO
i
•
Q
•••
J
U Z L. 6 ♦•
•�
• a
Q _ •
♦ •
O
_Q,
• ago an
I On d
000 ♦.•• `: ,
00
•
�?WQ��n^
O�
VI��OC�O
0 �
i • i
T V�
m0
Qom,^
�♦. i
O'
V
WOQ
W z0 iCL Z-
U WO��
/f7d
bm Do
�Q7
z
i
l
l� f7
l
a
b
•
�a
c o
O O - to ,,
3Li p��
�1 `
•1•
!�
n
Mn11K
no amn� w
Q•
3

b
a
b
y
MIMHUMF STA. 60+00.00
S,e 5Hze w
Dm�
O;
D � N m
mgom
mZ�
� o=ff <
n 0
O �on \ n
you � o
o
Oo� 0v"�[Fmn n
mO9� IOZ O A
ZP
�m I Y ap
oN s
® Z
anon equation
3525.00 back °o 0 0° o
OStation equation � P 252
0.00 ahead sta =1535
N � sta =6 .110
245'1SHFS DE
F -2
sta =18 .00
2- SP4 /551SFHS DE
w
500
P -3
sta =53 .00
SP1X/801 FA
1000
P-0
sta= 1034.00
I SP1 X/90 15FA
w
m
1500 PI 15'13'17"
P -5
sta= 1572.05
SP2 /100 1 SVAFA2
0
2000
n e7
�c
I m�
m n
A x P -6
s1e =217 .00
� A c SP1X/1001 FA
om
z
2500
N
3000, sta =297 .00
SP1X/1051 FA
3500
PI 32 °36'48"
P -8
s1a= 3716.69
SP4 /105 15VA
4000
I
4500 - — • P -9
sta= a500.00
d
SP1Xl105 15FA
n c
r� n
m
x
m /
II �
Z D I �
A
r
xo
b
a
b
y
MIMHUMF STA. 60+00.00
S,e 5Hze w
Dm�
O;
D � N m
mgom
mZ�
� o=ff <
n 0
O �on \ n
you � o
o
Oo� 0v"�[Fmn n
mO9� IOZ O A
ZP
�m I Y ap
oN s
® Z
anon equation
3525.00 back °o 0 0° o
OStation equation � P 252
0.00 ahead sta =1535
N � sta =6 .110
245'1SHFS DE
F -2
sta =18 .00
2- SP4 /551SFHS DE
w
500
P -3
sta =53 .00
SP1X/801 FA
1000
P-0
sta= 1034.00
I SP1 X/90 15FA
w
m
1500 PI 15'13'17"
P -5
sta= 1572.05
SP2 /100 1 SVAFA2
0
2000
n e7
�c
I m�
m n
A x P -6
s1e =217 .00
� A c SP1X/1001 FA
om
z
2500
N
3000, sta =297 .00
SP1X/1051 FA
3500
PI 32 °36'48"
P -8
s1a= 3716.69
SP4 /105 15VA
4000
I
4500 - — • P -9
sta= a500.00
d
SP1Xl105 15FA
n c
r� n
m
x
m /
II �
Z D I �
A

w sagas Ras
00.00+001 'VAX aunuo"n
v/
U
cv a LL
U
^�
_
to � �
Vug �
mo ;R
o
5p
°o
L L-d
00
0 W
�g
0099
e�
U y
N
y
e v°
u�
L
J S
z<
00' LZS =ujs
w sagas Ras
00.00+001 'VAX aunuo"n
v/
U
cv a LL
U
^�
ui
to � �
o
go
Q w�
5p
°o
w sagas Ras
00.00+001 'VAX aunuo"n
v/
U
g
oy
0009
o
go
5p
`W''
i WmQR
L L-d
z�
0 W
�g
0099
00'
W
46 =vls
z<
00' LZS =ujs
$
OO96
0 L-
`y
OS
rn
0
W
=UmQWo.
o N
0006
Vd9l 00VXLdS
00' L9 =E4s
M`
J
N
Q
i
v
0099
iRaxs FM
00'00 +so 'ns aNnN91Ba
MaNS slNI
0000 +SB Yls annxxrn
g
r
0009
VASL O61MS
99 4LLS =Uls
L L-d
VAS
L OOL/XLdS
0099
00'
W
46 =vls
00' LZS =ujs
OO96
0 L-
OS
rn
0
0006
Vd9l 00VXLdS
00' L9 =E4s
S L-d
i
r
0099
(Ory #lbo) dls l .89
805 L L 8 =e15
bL -d
.Ed. L L.9S- Id
0009
oZ
a
y
l` y
LL O
U
O^i
U W
~ W
L7 U
009L
Vd L 9MMdS
00' LE&W
I
OWL
LO
rn
VAS L 0M/XLdS
001 z99 =915
ZVCI
0099
iRaxs FM
00'00 +so 'ns aNnN91Ba
MaNS slNI
0000 +SB Yls annxxrn
r
0009
VASL O61MS
99 4LLS =Uls
L L-d
.EL,L0.6Z- I
0099
VAS I OOLNLdS
00' LZS =ujs
0 L-
OS
w iRRNS Ras
00'00 +os Yis RNmuva
W
O
O
C�
q
O
w
1

HIMHLH1 STA 100+00.00
391 SH1R P!
YAXHUN! STA 125 +0000
e-V TN19 SNFFT
OHA7CHIJHF STA. 123+00.00
1� THIS SHUT
b
P -21
sta= 12806.00
SP1X/100 1SFA
13000
b
V
C]
13500
P -22
V sta= 13528.00
r) c SP1X/105 1SFA
m�
x�
m c
°n
N
N D
zr
ci o
14000
120 °0 26'
P-23
sta =1414 .13
SP2 /1051St/ FA
A
N
14500
P -24
sta= 1456B.00
4 2- SP4 155 1 SFIFST
PI 0 °00'00'
'3
00
O
��� T
mom
O
O x
C F porn S P
4r N I n P
= 90 m O � P N
o� _R
(� o�K 1�Z�C
W �og� AO
iii �
m�
1
x = -0 17
sta =1009 .00
p W SP1X/100 1�FA
o�
N �
N 't
D
zr
c10
0
10500 '
� sta =1080 �00
SP1X11051 FA
11000
U
N
11500 PI 15 °49'28'
P -19
s1a= 1155D.82
SP2 /100 1 SVAFA2
N
I
12000
P -2o
sta= 12060.00
SP1X/100 1SFA

" V _ N �w
�w
LLI
i o %ua � � D O
is
i t"
CO
jL
CD
aW
N
a J
a
agkoC <_
<o
0
F11. all`
aNbW S�`�a gu ga — 8 m kYo
w
11141 X53 _;�� ��WWt O W z
ONE HT NS -f
AM
Win he U9 lei
ge
19111 !
a �
N= °W
W �s�
'3 �r:
A VAN U F
Z �� - w
SA w
o $ o
gh EWa _m Qs J `gym 1 lisp Y
Ul
HIM HO
ary�ozm" aka O� =kkd kjim
Wig i�o WIN
C�
LULJ
W a z ' -j
a9 ° J °grs ~� O
°i - °ate sr RS I W N� Y
T U
Z p - O
°
W
w v
o� � �i
Fw-
qry
a-Z
t4
saWU'm innz riaLr�N'S1N130'flM", wus WwPBOrLFAwImiAF�u.+�m.:�

v C.�
c S:
� m
A
g > H
zw
mz
s f m
0
6 4 $ X c
x
c m
a �
�,� �� Z7 a n S• m
Ix
4^ \t \, !
AA
X68
y:
C = ?
m
ifS-K Q6
o n qY�a
c �
� q Y
43
cn
9 a�
I
�0
o� T
r - 9
`-Q > NN
Q x
N
m
\l �R
M rn
Na ^.
F'y A
e'3�oSe
''Y3oi
3n
ai
gi
Zm
mw
.ws.S
o0
3
M
M
xm
!
N
H
H
�
3
-�

U y �
oS8
N j �
Lu
oa
Ur"
z
Li
Q z
Ro^
Q O
F-
co
oS8
88
W
V
krJ
Ro^
e
0 W
CO
+ +n
S G O
s= cgs
o�
oS8
Ro^
+ +n
S G O
ONO
�
O a P
rH ti
N N N
,q tOmmmyOy,. yOyLLm1�
1.1�41�000
/
O
O
00000
_ na N�onm
W W W W W W W W
Y
O�O�TNTN O�rnNw
4114Nf W xxxxxxx
F
000000Oao
zzzzzzzzz
-
O W W W W W W W W
v
O
Z>>>>>>>>--
Y Y Y
�000S8888 15
y,y� o°<i°a0,ww
8R
-
.-Mm . m K R K y y
005
�
g5 5 51555--
UOmmmmmmmm
-
c�ivaaaaaan aoo
- �
,
I
'
q
'li
u
ma
i
I
Y
p
N /
Ryq
/
L'
!C
tJ
1
_
v
"J
1
I
i .
\
O
ril-

3
S 0
= F � A
)Nj4 2
Zmy,OC) 2m CO Z9>�
�• H DDyCONmN�ZODmNyD�mm
O+� yy
e E I i T.
■ i I��• �v��y4�av$
_ L p v i�o mmi�so <° nog
Z e $ 1: 1-1 fi � gN 1? N i i�oz ou7`"y 90 <0
Q Q g4 $ a H 11 �img m�a�"iigxnNnm
> Z :Q �; AiA i CDmn ZgzLn
y7y '�'99 �' € �b �O[ • 4 Magi�gmgu.n,D
+L? Z 2 2 �4 M F e� Pi mo ��^mm'�mymg� >om2o
G1 DVFiD ° ;o 2 °D �Dm�
v y =2 ui "ui r Zp� DV>i LLmy�O A� Z$
ol
jll \ \VVV� _F D 10� m_ Y a N >
pm+�p00�y
.< I 2�isclyN�i Cp��nysi
o��sm�AC"yF�pp�m°�m
�LO ;Z�y °p_gypp p�pAUK -iF0
8D�')it ^ ?• A i fclNn ymN 222 <o Zfm']
inp Zmy >Zi Q'v win
11SS�'T,. m5�c�, >r
!�g mz >z
oat$Ip� Nr° m� zz 2
R.
r: m N • C oU T
£ E n m m �' n •OT�Q ? mAio liz 9 9
,
no
3 E asQ D
�•L1 v o r n " rni� n �� imp N ° op •.$ N$ "g
b s E w ti c 9 ?� qo qa 4
^ a > g u Z -
s Y F n c� m �� :�, -C zo
m'0
SL
OR
y V FrG g
3
O� fO -S 2 c>OC� o
O Q
PI N Sir F 03tcn m oAG�n�on HAT
's 'czi Q n° aim" m o cmcZ i °mf = � "L� �F� ZZGA 0-m g F " � ���� i �r°_n
P �^ m> n > �NN �^nyo� nmy o 00 3 viZf >o Cl m rz -p1 yno �i °
Om fm�1 t >�n Zsry L A Z1C1�11�OAZ�Af ZDA? ZFF 2�y L'O Fi m DN° >�Cn 1tA1Z
N n F m> r>S aAOIA2A ]l yy> °mOVyI �r yNSN mCZ VI GZ1 st >Znn ~m �mZ+�i UI.°T []°
>mmOmm>non �p i�yZ>Z_mon �>>n�{V�NmNrm OCOS Pm D2Z C�m � � �Ai tO E.
o �° =9� Zm D <2< NUIFDNC C;Snm >O �m0 iZ> ° O �io 0— AS
00 �O
�i p Nn a m° NiF iez �A Tnz� z AW gm9 < m ^'z °m Sao Z. <c
Y� min mi > °v mrnmF °o $r°z A °c �2o Z3 m °a noo n�o^m m
y o_° b <i on 0:" z� $finQy, oc w °82�po
S ZA nom° pn= a °a0Zo � QZO�S °2o O z"vl m<y Zvi M.
4F am ao ro <t m r F� �y5o ;o F � °� z 5 in "uiQ n og mno
�2m nN i_ °" ZN <OI�AN A�f�l�g0 m ZZZ m p z ~U N °y�C
^� z �n oL" ;� ° o�1m+�v�� S �mjp gym°? °z oo Qp� gn 9" ~o °c
�8 mnA v�,mil 2zz 0r4 g�0�§Av �nG >r QF �B °g i. c °m�v
T �C >By�A g jF . F p�Z ' OcZ { �O z
ZO °Na1 NO ° S� m9 �� Z N mx ° <> m
V
OA "rF NNa =_�0 - oc €m �n^ i m of o3 o�F" f
az im °c�m�°`+ mz n'i °zy yO erg q2m `�' m u2imri
�� m aynf ci -mm y +� � °n t� o o nz NZ Z
$ v 400mz z -m h %F, �,vP iii >Z Zo� ° a '�' "pr{�a"i n
rrllA��c [ no o >oo�� °a m ti z S'• ra �c_j
9 O N ym0 >-F, H. 2 ; N O A VI � Z y
A m N OxONy VIZS <A� � m� �ppV jnm
y � <
` p8(l •� A
` " - Tm Nyu 1�1NC O °m vm �Oin ZCfS�mvZi Z °UI ZOO A °Z y9�0 m
v � i • n O >Om 5 2 ;Z V1 QN9iy rn A CI
°mm omr° 9 °gym OOO co, ZZ CS Ky mn0 Z 2y0��� ZOgO
09_ o� ao ;o OFn ° z< mZ
I,^ o '^ mn t�1n r�li il�mnl ciynm ry�F�v Nim nau�y»+� oC_m
�U ���. °L OC� OOAm A T.c; 8�Z Vlnm<D � O ~NZ �a�9N 1�1 �fl�Vl 2�
O �2 mammo�a o� icon nigaoi�moA2m ?tom or� v>
S+> m� m ; viino? ' Fim om°piZgaumi"'z_Zz AR A%O omiZo�n K aZ
p mi >g mm >�� �m a�rl cif °� °o Aw n°m Z Gino co
r. m y rCL ovL��y oz OLtimO�y,gN �z mniO~ A mm y2
�o N�F nnivc AO my4z O�o m °m0 Ni Zi � �H �mc0 Om"
rn U� r_ °mp E'Jm�nA VIO Cn00�o D r O >m �m nr+iA C
xo3 7 mo no r�m>o °�+_ z 'om <rsn_f ^Jo
n% `� pr a 2m0 ZI~I mmgv yOy mzg, 2, '�t� ZZ AT 2n�00~ o. mm
OE� T FO D < Z [pfA�OIZ�Im m �N�r� Imll �A Zm� vA,9Zm u, x
'1T1 L D C m 1IAA y ° c UI
mg a m timH I o 0 0 0 � C no uci r7
2 x m fn
m
A
O�
m�
v
�S
r$1
,
ASk
��
w�
_A
o a
°{��'^
S•
• , m
R
�
FQ
fit
f
F
m
c
a
a�•�
�'�
O
0 0,
o
c o
N
o g
A
4 b4
n
n
R
a.•—
m 6
3
•
�i Is si
�
n
n O
VO
S n
v
O�
m�
v
,
.
0 0
� �
_A
o a
°{��'^
n
• , m
C F
V
4 m
{
F
m
c
a
a�•�
�'�
O
0 0,
o
c o
N
o g
A
4 b4
n
n
v
A73
�
O�
m�
0
0 0
0 0
0 0
° Oy
0 0
o a
°{��'^
m ti
O
t V
Nb4�N°A•�ON
O �
V
4 m
{
F
� �
c
a
a�•�
�'�
O
0 0,
o
c o
N
o g
A
4 b4
n
n
� �
c
a
a�•�
�'�
v
A73
�
9
n
e
m
N
X
�
v
eTi n
7.
-ni
3
��
!1
n
t
c
a
a�•�
�'�
v
A73
�
e
m
m
3
��
!1
n

OV
i
II
6 i I
{ w
a' b
r
Yis
r Y
K�� A�8
orn a
m '
Qf
n
^ r
J
°O m
. a � °ahro
dz
°0Z
n Q N O m 0
aUaOr ^ID In
�Ag
Fa
gi°�
oza
n ^
/!
I
WWmm_�z
acme °zJ� 3
I
C)
�w<
tpti W9
3
U
l
�
I �
V
_oo
m
.. �••�
Q yr O
.�•
'
r° mm
.-o
p Z000-0
a^
a. n N
•••�•• -�
•O. -'
�•••• L~L0 V ..
LL Z
of m
w,Dn1 0
WDO�O^jm
L) O�m
• m� U U
�• 0
ti
<zmmz
aJOOa in
�rn��F O
q
3
_
rn r, o Q
+ o ��z
�, a rn Z a
rn
WD_
ti
zwao \ CD
Z
Q U Of LjMM c,
j rip2c�om°
4
w
. �Jao,n l
NFU -m2-rm
U
•� 1 rnQm ° ^o
._'_
i
KmZ JO
\ X Q.
o
x
wp (6
n
V
i p z-
p�
� ,— a _ ♦
aSo
a
a.
►
r
Yis
r Y
K�� A�8
orn a
m '
Qf
n
^ r
J
°O m
. a � °ahro
dz
°0Z
n Q N O m 0
aUaOr ^ID In
�Ag
Fa
gi°�
oza
n ^
/!
I
WWmm_�z
acme °zJ� 3
I
C)
�w<
tpti W9
3
U
\
Z o.
I �
••
m
.. �••�
Q yr O
.�•
'
r° mm
.-o
p Z000-0
a^
a. n N
•••�•• -�
•O. -'
�•••• L~L0 V ..
LL Z
of m
w,Dn1 0
WDO�O^jm
L) O�m
• m� U U
�• 0
ti
<zmmz
aJOOa in
�rn��F O
q
3
_
rn r, o Q
+ o ��z
�, a rn Z a
rn
WD_
ti
zwao \ CD
Z
Q U Of LjMM c,
j rip2c�om°
4
w
. �Jao,n l
NFU -m2-rm
U
•� 1 rnQm ° ^o
._'_
i
KmZ JO
\ X Q.
o
x
wp (6
n
i p z-
p�
� ,— a _ ♦
aSo
a
a.
►
o U
1
p it
H
♦ Z z ♦ • .•
0 3 U ♦1 1
♦
♦
U
q a f �I
O 3
♦t
-j LLJ Iv It,,
I--a mz
q — —\ w J
�Q�, a
-j
Xa- >- w_
L-
c
X p Z w ♦
z m
—�' '•
_j 0
N of r II
a
j4_ ;
Q. �OU'UOL (n
qwU �� < _H
o z N
rF� "LI�o
a ^r000
J
\r%
KNsy zO
Wvr� tpp.� n
wr3 ♦
OC JO
r W
LLJ
z
1
1
�
Q o
W
y>
V),
N I
IJ
1
D_
Q I
1
°'QQrr
,o
AN FA;RNi'-
�w3�nrrn (/
- rJ¢ I m
� p
n Q F 6 O N° 0 \ S
<WN�apVl J \ \\
:
- 7t -- - -%
oF�V) mo ^0 I1• \Jim
__!. = = =_
\
m j !,
�L�gZmZJo
eta
a�c'� °Q i f
�■
t
J •
W= gl �o
I
1
°
�OO. Om g,�
o J
♦ �w
z �
Z 1
t
Z
N�UC
0
' oil
w _ Q arn�
^o0..r � 1
a
Fna�aZ
01,
17 • +
p
O
< F'_D
i
7
U
RAW LIMIT /' - --
crw°
a
3`, !�,'
A
N B CK RDITE 230
C. N0. 501 -6
-
!�
2
i �
tp � aD• -I�t-
LINE INDEX 1W158
_
_
3 � REF. DWG. N0. 000325 376780 8 100
' acs; - --
(O �O,�w
' Rp LIMIT 04U
- rte
I��r
JO
EAmf
L/UIJ
Ir
o _
w CY a
j S¢
Q W �
°o
co
a o 0
o d e
2
n n n
0 0 0 0
N O O O
° N
3 3 3
Q0
M
(O
a J
a O
O
O
OO
C�
q
I
W
o
Z
0
Qf
p
q w
J
Z �S
om
dz
°0Z
D W
�Ag
Fa
gi°�
oza
1 is
y
w
u�a
Q
wzw
w0m
Z
woN
Noo
�w<
V
Q0
M
(O
a J
a O
O
O
OO
C�
q
I
W
ij V l
Qf
p
q w
J
fx
In
�%
J w
� ■N�Na[Ylj
OU pr
Q
3yg
p a
V
<z62
a o
e
Z o.
I �
.Vryirn
D_
- a ixM
�- I O c
Q yr O
aP.
.
% hJUa
• 7
t0
OJ w
1
oGN
TI
°U
2
to
.o
:
�, a rn Z a
rn
WD_
ti
• ma
Z
Q U Of LjMM c,
j rip2c�om°
4
w
. �Jao,n l
NFU -m2-rm
U
•� 1 rnQm ° ^o
._'_
i
KmZ JO
\ X Q.
o
x
wp (6
• rn
�UJ So
i p z-
p�
Q0
M
(O
a J
a O
O
O
OO
C�
q
I
owrr;1 1
r A1Nn ■
npSn�Jbg
< <�a
mum
J
fx
In
O
0
OU pr
O rz
b'S ; wo
p a
V
<z62
a o
��
;
Z o.
.Vryirn
D_
0
Q yr O
j q U
�• O fn N
t
CJ 0
OJ w
1
oGN
TI
:
OO
WD_
ti
o3iLn,o
Z
Z N
�q(.7
no n
•�rl�
NFU -m2-rm
g.
OWN
N
i
\ X Q.
o
x
wp (6
i p z-
p�
aSo
a
a.
►
o U
1
p it
H
-o
e p
♦,
I
U U-
L-
c
U
•
�
EEE
tl
J
fI
1
- -
W
y>
1
n
°
t
q
r Z
ai
J
eta
O
o
r
cam
w W
O
< F'_D
i
7
U
I, W rn
1,b
crw°
a
_� - ' 0
03 Nhrno,
1
i �
tp � aD• -I�t-
t ,n3aa�^°
_
(O �O,�w
vlJ.,.r ��p.^..N
- rte
JO
�•
M 04 Z W d
V sp
; a
/ a < n
1. a z
Q0
M
(O
a J
a O
O
O
OO
C�
q
I
owrr;1 1
r A1Nn ■
npSn�Jbg
< <�a
mum
J
fx
•
O
0
OU pr
•
`� rr��'r± o Vpp
(n
<z62
a o
��
;
Z o.
O
D_
0
rn
C7
t
n n
o✓ rnn
to o
r om
o3iLn,o
•�rl�
NFU -m2-rm
p it
H
?
i
J _j
p w
U U-
toll
•
Y ►�pvE
EEE
J
Q0
M
(O
a J
a O
O
O
OO
C�
q
I

I•
O O m CJI J rn G : nb�rroA, C
A r /; • rri
D m�oN� j'� - _r...�r ao 0 / ON
z En
C7 Z °
° c�
♦/ i zc• oo •
10 4F
� _. ����••• � � chi � fn a°o ON>
D •�� f
C .� •.�, n
i
N .••• / ' c %�
1 m ; O.rpmUlD yr .000
° f z� u aro i
cn4mI>MOEA- a cvn • 1
'r,♦�,r�Ia p�on3 o r�N 1
aOmu O.3 0
p 0 .> 5 n - 1 D
w steno O w�
° n
1 �m or
n
A to V
aa1 a1 j D , r,r m W cn aa1 a ime z ; N cn W O> ♦��.
Ord o OA�r °
0a 1a m cow
V C � D
-Zivo oar \\\ % cpa�o c �r zO� OI 1 �ov
ODD �C) O I
1 ` 0 n NZD { x n ♦ Z00
c O u O
674AOC r M O D O
� X
a m< �O m D
11 O M D D Z7 0 . 1`I` � m
1 T > co I a 'I m r
s' O �Z D D = a i t n O
Z70 >p IL i , I, D-,
�z�. • Do
>z
LA
o
C
�j f♦ i , • <
M �"" i 1 O A
f,r a1 c - '0°+.Pn 1 n mnprp
a
r D ° 9 -o0,oi- +:�
>�
0_1 N` -m-.Sp 1 i Gf1 uFnn� ao
1 � _ " W o . - rA j rl O'n
1 as • aD�u NOO V I • 10
1, 1 O obi A I
Oa
r • .• fr •i z •
•
rte'% ^D O�• I 2
rn
I
M
O ••
• N
r • 9 'c z
v a
J ° w n
OD . i •• ° °° • aOOp_
z z r�
aQ�� mr'omz
CIO a • 70 cDi> Z! Z° • t
r A' • c CAaMA
p
°
1•
�Awo "tom*
µ ►t�4a N • 1 i
a ass °� •
m• m I
_>r.- i s r
r „ = ` Yy a��tK {, CD
N VA.
�.` z
a • c qa
n ; N
} m ; m >:
m
or
mm N N n
88 > $£ €
aq. mill,
N
A
�z0
g ion z
./ ��F -
g
;s
MID
f� �� n I [l nOinb °� sA
Q6 Rwg rn � �r�, m --z 8 '�C 'gC ? � I _ u %,
II v� Q 3 8n, rS

" a
Li i
W v 8S
T5
ZK Y Wgs
W !Ia ag Iz
0.
�a
c ►w n �O o0 i I �5 m u OO
y tlo �r oE6 k'j
Z , O
�W< !�
� H
o
N O ~
°° w ! U w w Z °000 ♦ +'� O
,U) W,- O I-0 ••.
I w N O ♦ ••• cl-
,0
_ cw U M
In
♦•••'
to
Z a ♦ ♦• '�I
■ g � m � d• N Op U — •• rq
M01i►/gILIW ■a �v aiiai i7C ' i o00pg[ a M M IA ••••
00'94 +a1 7u Enrluawn J'' m
' ! �a�� 'i J ^1000 ♦•�• to
CL U Z Wa •ay1►�r�:.
000 0£4 i I . •
-
■ N(na_
� O '� • oa�on '�
W ••• U6JWFNrnn^
• I O~
a � ••• �Qamaa�il
0 JJ i, 0 •• .,v). -0Om
J Z) W 1� O wJO'�0 ^n
Q c 0z
1 U Uw OO WWRWmaZ.-
�,1, U 2 ¢moo a7
I/1 I H (]
Q a U �O aYa �J
nd �i I~i�OZ Q 10�• np
lD
00002[ I M] 10 C7
000 .00
J (7� � 1•a•.
In N1O�U U
+ 01 p�j�� 11�i d 0) NIjW
..
r). 10 O , �; 000, t p If1 0
OS O tr • /
d �Za 'i < a NZ W a /
1,
� (n •py< �• 000'09[ '�
4
n �
rrr r • • 1 I dm
t n c>a
o In n
T _o z
w a
1 W W ^ � U IX O
vl ago^ r ti
1 U) a n 3
no o- o [��
oa� $O0• (�
Z -�U
E� �% WwFm
a U
CL �+
� • O
of w n
n
33 Iywd
Zai
LZ
CE
YP - __.___• •
\ J 3W121
1
SCI �P� O I C 7 j i U a
U LL
co
W
�N 3Ni^j rn W I 0006
Z I 0o Na fp
v°p f 10
�z 6:
cL - J, o c; z t o i�
i (K o < ■ w
a o° � � z � � �- ��`•
� O
O 1° U lL
LLJ
c
'IV
n 0! a N.,
w N oJ �o � wa�n ° p ^ J � 0
fW
z Z o Vn )
r_I
J ,0,N Z �
0 w 1
Ln
1�
1
0 �
b0 � • 1 I v>
elf I In ; I
Ir CO
its L) CO 014 is
wx
8>$� N7 5th �11[i1N�T1 Ir COI3Y0CIJNW YDI 7AOBY 799 � a � i
y',�NU p2 YOR DO'94fiL1 719 iNRC]tfll �
1 i 51L Sxi� • d

a
v�ti
1 �a
�
.•
� \
ly
-------------- t
�
• °
O
vv
O`t, �om ��r� -a 1 � � �-�C
� � ^•a'ayaFw
y
c
v
M�'I � a�2
Q
•.
O
l'
�C
i
a
z
1
�
'
CD
c a
�
�
•j
y
G
C�
O^ ',
Q (;) v
•
• •
I• •
O q (o 4.Q q _ - n••°
Vi
,
\
�"'�
asN.B�
some
sGTVA
� r
�I
V
y
d
O
iii x�..���T��E
� �
T If
m
z
AA"
Z
k�gN
ag F�
859_
m-
�y X
e
0
s

LJJ
to
Q
pj
bm
M
LL�j �
<�
W
8
�•►
SL W
Co
=Z
§--o
co
o"
.3�
0 W
o
�
Ww
�0n
O
gtg�g8°
75 (f � 6 � � •[
�FF �yy i�}
� W
}yyyy}jj���� �Vy�
((((
I�5 � � „
� 80
e� w
x
� I
1 d Q aN°
I
C�
1 N tZ n�3a
1 (U cr. JO
WW mm
a�
a
i' t
O
o
O
a
v�
7
M � p � � 1 •p
n¢3p�io° U s
J •mZJO
a
,1: N U1 1
1
•
�
• � �
O
U I~i � O
0000 •••,•
••
a
�mao
O �
•
SEE SNEET _ . 1 1
M p H Z
� Q' � N � (� �
�•�•••
.••
a r7 -,n
•.
m i S
1
•
�
•�'
•••
Ld
a
Mm3o�'°� w
NOJa�nN F-
,1,
••
�
Ln
to
Q
pj
bm
M
LL�j �
<�
W
8
�•►
SL W
Co
=Z
§--o
co
o"
.3�
0 W
o
�
Ww
�0n
O
gtg�g8°
75 (f � 6 � � •[
�FF �yy i�}
� W
}yyyy}jj���� �Vy�
((((
I�5 � � „
� 80
e� w
x
� I
1 d Q aN°
I
C�
1 N tZ n�3a
1 (U cr. JO
WW mm
a�
a
i' t
O
o
O
a
v�
7
M � p � � 1 •p
n¢3p�io° U s
J •mZJO
a
,1: N U1 1
1
•
�
• � �
O
U I~i � O
0000 •••,•
••
O �
•
SEE SNEET _ . 1 1
M p H Z
� Q' � N � (� �
�•�•••
.••
a r7 -,n
•.
Ld
Ln
Lf)
• wo o n
n
• •
OpO� •�•�; � i 1
1 (p
•
-••
�ZK rnnn
WOLF
•
•
u�Qa a
,n
V '/ S
' ••
�VWJ��O�
�3N
•y`ZfS�
•• � ti
�
•
JW pQ
-mazes
">>a
•�•
• Gj ! 1•
� V
Wza�
L) Ow

O
b
a
a
b
O
O
y US c
VAMWW ni w.00.00
sss xxw n
z�� T
co m�
pz�o _ ` N
TpO� � o
Cy, J y�r D
G^X� 2� N
vl keg MA np n N T
y� I ti
�J xg V, rT1 A= s
gN & <
® A
alion equation v " °0 0D
3525.00 back o
OStation equation P 252
0.00 ahead sta =1535 �,
sta =6 .00
2�5'1SHFS�DE
HF -2
sta= 18.00
2-SP4/55 1SFHS�DE
500
P -3
sta =53 .00
SP 1X/80 15FA
0
1000
P-4
sta =10 .00
SP 1X/90 1 SFA
m
1500 PI 15'13'17'
P -5
sta= 1572.05
SP2i 100 'I SVAFA2
v
2000 t
� d
:L7 C
M �
fTl C7
sta =217 .00
� c SP1X/100 1 FA
a�
N TI
�D
zr
�o
2500
i
3000 ste =297 .00
SP1X/1051 FA
i
I
3500
P132 °36' 8"
I P -8
s1a= 3716.69
SP4I105 1 SVA
4000
mV
Of
4500 P -9
sta= 450uL.00
SP 1X/105 15FA
n
�A1
Imn
'mx
I �
w
2 D �
nr
x
O
b
a
a
b
O
O
y US c
VAMWW ni w.00.00
sss xxw n
z�� T
co m�
pz�o _ ` N
TpO� � o
Cy, J y�r D
G^X� 2� N
vl keg MA np n N T
y� I ti
�J xg V, rT1 A= s
gN & <
® A
alion equation v " °0 0D
3525.00 back o
OStation equation P 252
0.00 ahead sta =1535 �,
sta =6 .00
2�5'1SHFS�DE
HF -2
sta= 18.00
2-SP4/55 1SFHS�DE
500
P -3
sta =53 .00
SP 1X/80 15FA
0
1000
P-4
sta =10 .00
SP 1X/90 1 SFA
m
1500 PI 15'13'17'
P -5
sta= 1572.05
SP2i 100 'I SVAFA2
v
2000 t
� d
:L7 C
M �
fTl C7
sta =217 .00
� c SP1X/100 1 FA
a�
N TI
�D
zr
�o
2500
i
3000 ste =297 .00
SP1X/1051 FA
i
I
3500
P132 °36' 8"
I P -8
s1a= 3716.69
SP4I105 1 SVA
4000
mV
Of
4500 P -9
sta= 450uL.00
SP 1X/105 15FA
n
�A1
Imn
'mx
I �
w
2 D �
nr
x

> N �fx
rZ
z�
ti
Q z Z
LU
f w
<o LU $$ �uyJ,
co
�uj HR `V
Z W g
cn
zo
W G I UU�
N H
< 1� < c'
�oo = o
QQ
w Mus aas
oo.00+009 was 7NrmavH 0
O
Oo
[�
f
V
aa7NS ssea
00'00:97 laS 7NfINaL�If
aa7Ns SWa
0000+97 Yas ammaLIN
49
0009
VASL 06IMS
99,YLS =eIs
LL
.E l Zo.6Z- I
——
0059
VdSL OOL/XLdS
00'�LZ9 =eIs
0 L-
D00
9a jiffs ass
0000 +09 7as xmnR LIN
m
Vj 1001lXldS
00' 46 =e1s
yl. _ oass
I
rn
0
0006
VdS�L OOL/XIdS
00'06[8 =els
SL -d
0099
m
I
(ofV #1VO) d1Sl .99
BO'S[ LB =els
4 L -�
L.jlld�
0009
J 2
Q N
i W N
O
� U
= Y
� �W
qa
L)
OOSL
VdSI SOL/XLdS
00'9LEL =eIs
E L-¢
OOOL
I
r
Vd�L OOL/XLdS
00' Z59 =els
z L -d

YAMHUNt STA. 100+00.00
SSS SNttT P/
YAWHUNt STA f25 +00.00
e-v TNIS 5HEC
O
YATCNUNt STA. ?M+00 DO
TN13 SNttS
b
a
a
b
0
�7
'y
00
O
Co
ro ; ao r
r mom
C.. o
o
� pz� Z <
Q �� aoci a i
m�T w
ya z o 3 9-
Aj
i AQp � P
��F G
I A
w
a °- °
aB� rn o =oo s
o=mil 7 z z pp
vN %'yi ZC i I N m iiS �D
L�gCI rn]� yD I N yn 3-
tz
a8 FI �rn �Z
b _ �N
e Z_
m = UQ
Me
m = P -17
sta= 1D099.00
� m SP1Xl100 15FA
�c
a�
y D
zr
c7 0
0
10500 - -
� sta =1080 .00
SP1X/1051 FA
11000
can
N
11500 PI 15 °49'28"
-19
sta =1155 .82
SP2/100 1 SVA'FA2
N
O
12000
20
sta =1206 .00
SP1 X/100 1P
P -21
sta= 12808.00
SP1X/100 15FA
N
O
13500
-22
sta =1352 .00
� ty
SP1Xl105 1 FA
M,
m,
�n
x
-lnj m
W
� c
V1 '�
V
VI '�
D
zr
c7 a
14000
120 °0
26'
P -23
sta= 74145.13
SP2 /105 1 SVSTFA
A
N
W
14500
P -24
FA
sta= 1456B.OD
V
m
P -21
sta= 12808.00
SP1X/100 15FA
N
O
13500
-22
sta =1352 .00
� ty
SP1Xl105 1 FA
M,
m,
�n
x
-lnj m
W
� c
V1 '�
V
VI '�
D
zr
c7 a
14000
120 °0
26'
P -23
sta= 74145.13
SP2 /105 1 SVSTFA
A
N
W
14500
P -24
sta= 1456B.OD
� 2- SP4l55 1 SHFST
PI 0 °00'00"

c�
z
y u l
0 " a to J
wm �o W W zuja Yw
Cfl Z)Z
LJJ Z
N � W
!A ?W
v/ KY Q
a
M
NN
$ oo y
a%
W � =a ,Fir
o° c�
F— F-
$
7m z
aoAz���i N ox:it G <YY,� <
It
cr
AR W
n10
a �
4 z°k'i
r mho
i U {
o� Z f
< • Q € J
- H
LLJ Hi
M IK9 - �� z - " 1 1.
ins 8 U
6.1 Z.
W
�s x LL
H.4 Sbr
ch
-6 N 3 1 € i$'"`�'$ +Z& " (n
z -z m" \mw ZO EWE ( Z.
5 7<$�� $ „�� 80 •�Ei
<z of €ou`98
” 2k ``
�_so�"uzk'u<
.2 ��u i�laa'Wa�<m�o
Uzi
� N �
W
W
Z.
d S (n
Lj
FIX s
� W
c W U
°t8g 0
X< 8
�v
_ m7
V v J
ww .0 mx.x.�wmx sxua �i w.s.rwmeo.e.sonw,aw�a

v C,� oz
o �
F
i m
m
N o
n
X
C
F Z77
1 71
eC
lit y�
C _ -
8
fTl
R
R�
m
B r API! l& r iii!11 € Z
s $ lit
s
Z � �
> D (n IY ;?
o; T
V
0 0�
�' ma
CAD
rn �>
Z c ° m
op
rn�
m
h
- u
3i
}•�
$
eS
•�
;e
3a
s
�•s
y
m
A
ja
osa�$
x
mru
x�•
-
FFd
m
f
mw
fA
xp
�e
em
_o�_.
ay
#Zo3
H
p0
z
m
Si
;u
u'
S
3i
}•�
$
eS
•�
;e
3a
s
y
m
A
ja
=�
m�
�D
m
f
mN
O
fA
xp
�e
em
z

ATTACHMENT A
PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION FORM
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
A. REPORT COMPLETION DATE FOR PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL
DETERMINATION (JD): August 8, 2014
B. NAME AND ADDRESS OF PERSON REQUESTING PRELIMINARY JD:
Eric Mularski, PWS 400 South Church Street Suite 1000, Charlotte, NC 28202 on behalf of Duke Engergy
Carolinas, LLC
C. DISTRICT OFFICE, FILE NAME, AND NUMBER:
D. PROJECT LOCATION(S) AND BACKGROUND INFORMATION:
Begins near Chapman Farm Lane and ends at the proposed Barrier Road Retail Substation See Maps
(USE THE ATTACHED TABLE TO DOCUMENT MULTIPLE WATERBODIES AT DIFFERENT
SITES)
State NC
County /parish /borough. Cabarrus and Rowan City Near Concord
Center coordinates of site (lat/long in degree decimal format)
Lat 34 487938 °N, Long -80 54016
Universal Transverse Mercator
ow
Name of nearest waterbody Dutch Buffalo Creek
Identify (estimate) amount of waters in the review area
Non - wetland waters
725 linear feet width (ft) and /or acres
Cowardin Class R3UB2, R41LIB2, and R31LIB1
Stream Flow Intermittent and Perennial
Wetlands 0 61 acres
Cowardin Class PSS and PFO
Name of any water bodies on the site that have been identified as Section 10
waters
Tidal N/A
Non - Tidal. None
1

E
REVIEW PERFORMED FOR SITE EVALUATION (CHECK ALL THAT
APPLY):
❑ Office (Desk) Determination Date
❑✓ Field Determination Date(s) February 26 and 27, 2014
SUPPORTING DATA. Data reviewed for preliminary JD
(check all that apply - checked items should be included in case file and,
where checked and requested, appropriately reference sources below):
✓❑ Maps, plans, plots or plat submitted by or on behalf of the
appliCant/consultant HDR for Duke Energy Carolinas, LLC
❑✓ Data sheets prepared /submitted by or on behalf of the
applicant/consultant
Office concurs with data sheets /delineation report
Office does not concur with data sheets /delineation report
❑ Data sheets prepared by the Corps
❑ Corps navigable waters' study
❑ U S Geological Survey Hydrologic Atlas
❑ USGS NHD data
❑ USGS 8 and 12 digit HUC maps
❑✓ U S Geological Survey map(s) Cite scale & quad name China Grove Concod Mt Pleasant
✓❑ USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service Soil Survey
Citation' Cabarrus and Rowan Counties
❑ National wetlands inventory map(s) Cite name
❑ State /Local wetland inventory map(s)-
❑ FEMA/FIRM maps
❑ 100 -year Floodplain Elevation is
(National Geodectic Vertical Datum of 1929)
❑✓ Photographs ❑ Aerial (Name & Date)
❑✓ Other (Name & Date) See attached
❑ Previous determination(s) File no and date of response letter
❑ Other information (please specify)
N
or

1 The Corps of Engineers believes that there may be jurisdictional waters of the
United States on the subject site, and the permit applicant or other affected party
who requested this preliminary JD is hereby advised of his or her option to
request and obtain an approved jurisdictional determination (JD) for that site
Nevertheless, the permit applicant or other person who requested this
preliminary JD has declined to exercise the option to obtain an approved JD in
this instance and at this time
2 In any circumstance where a permit applicant obtains an individual permit, or
a Nationwide General Permit (NWP) or other general permit verification requiring
"pre- construction notification" (PCN), or requests verification for a non - reporting
NWP or other general permit, and the permit applicant has not requested an
approved JD for the activity, the permit applicant is hereby made aware of the
following (1) the permit applicant has elected to seek a permit authorization
based on a preliminary JD, which does not make an official determination of
jurisdictional waters, (2) that the applicant has the option to request an approved
JD before accepting the terms and conditions of the permit authorization, and
that basing a permit authorization on an approved JD could possibly result in less
compensatory mitigation being required or different special conditions, (3) that
the applicant has the right to request an individual permit rather than accepting
the terms and conditions of the NWP or other general permit authorization, (4)
that the applicant can accept a permit authorization and thereby agree to comply
with all the terms and conditions of that permit, including whatever mitigation
requirements the Corps has determined to be necessary, (5) that undertaking
any activity in reliance upon the subject permit authorization without requesting
an approved JD constitutes the applicant's acceptance of the use of the
preliminary JD, but that either form of JD will be processed as soon as is
practicable, (6) accepting a permit authorization (e g , signing a proffered
individual permit) or undertaking any activity in reliance on any form of Corps
permit authorization based on a preliminary JD constitutes agreement that all
wetlands and other water bodies on the site affected in any way by that activity
are jurisdictional waters of the United States, and precludes any challenge to
such jurisdiction in any administrative or judicial compliance or enforcement
action, or in any administrative appeal or in any Federal court, and (7) whether
the applicant elects to use either an approved JD or a preliminary JD, that JD
will be processed as soon as is practicable Further, an approved JD, a proffered
individual permit (and all terms and conditions contained therein), orAndividual
permit denial can be administratively appealed pursuant to 33 C F R Part 331,
and that in any administrative appeal, jurisdictional issues can be raised (see 33
C F R. 331 5(a)(2)). If, during that administrative appeal, it becomes necessary
to make an official determination whether CWA jurisdiction exists over a site, or
to provide an official delineation of jurisdictional waters on the site, the Corps will
provide an approved JD to accomplish that result, as soon as is practicable
3

This preliminary JD finds that there "may be" waters of the United States on the
subject project site, and identifies all aquatic features on the site that could be
affected by the proposed activity, based on the following information
IMPORTANT NOTE: The information recorded on this form has not
necessarily been verified by the Corps and should not be relied upon for
later jurisdictional determinations.
Signature and date of
Regulatory Project Manager
(REQUIRED)
4
wdham metcalfe@ MgWy sgro by wtl ,— ff,@9uke-
DN --1..—t.1f.@d.k—nergy-
duke- energy corn--D.? 2111309,3,50926 0400'
U
Signature and date of
person requesting preliminary JD
(REQUIRED, unless obtaining
the signature is impracticable)

Duke Energy Barrier Road 100 kV Tap Transmission Line Project
Jurisdictional Resources
y
�� �Site;NumberKo����
, r �,
Latitude
Longitude
:0s NOR.
Cowardin
Estimated�Amouiit
�aF 4.
'of+AyuaticlResource
"H �r -
OM Class
f Name ;r
.
Class
=4,
"rea
r AquaticResource
vStream
��. ��
'�.�,. e
_�:n.iriStudydxA �
� • = ���������°��
1(s1)
35 506
-8051-3
R3UB2
45 linear feet
non section 10 —
(tributary to Dutch Buffalo Creek
non -tidal
Stream 2 (s2)
0 linear feet
non section 10 —
(tributary to Dutch Buffalo Creek)
35 506
-80 513
R4UB2
(located outside of
non -tidal
Stud Area)
Stream 3 (0)
35 506
-80513
R3UB2
125 linear feet
non section 10 —
Dutch Buffalo Creek
non -tidal
Stream 4 (s4)
35 505
-80512
R4UB2
95 linear feet
non section 10 —
(tributary to Dutch Buffalo Creek
non -tidal
Stream 5 (s5)
35 501
-80510
None
70 linear feet
non -404 regulated
(tributary to Dutch Buffalo Creek
Stream 6 (s6)
35 497
-80510
R3UB2
75 linear feet
non section 10 —
(tributary to Dutch Buffalo Creek
non -tidal
Stream 7 (s7)
35 493
-80508
R4UB2
90 linear feet
non section 10 —
(tributary to Dutch Buffalo Creek
non -tidal
Stream 8 (s8)
35 490
-80504
R3UB1
70 linear feet
non section 10 —
(tributary to Dutch Buffalo Creek
non -tidal
Stream 9 (s9)
35 490
-80497
R3UB1
150 linear feet
non section 10 —
(tributary to Dutch Buffalo Creek)
Stream 10 (s10)
35 487
-80486
R4UB2
75 linear feet
non section 10 —
(tributary to Dutch Buffalo Creek
non -tidal
Wetland 1 (w1)
35 507
- 80514
PSS1 B
0 31 acre
non section 10 —
wetland
Wetland 2 (w2)
35 507
-80514
PF01 B
0 03 acre
non section 10 —
wetland
Wetland 3 (w3)
35 514
-80514
PF01 C
0 08 acre
non section 10 —
wetland
Wetland 4 (w4)
35 502
-80510
PF01 B
0 02 acre
non section 10 —
wetland
Wetland 5 (w5)
35 502
-80510
PF01 C
0 02 acre
non section 10 —
wetland
Wetland 6 (w6)
35 499
-80510
PF01 C
0 07 acre
non section 10 —
wetland
Wetland 7 (w7)
35 495
-80509
PF01 C
0 02 acre
non section 10 —
wetland
Wetland 8 (w8)
35 490
-80503
PEM1 B
0 002 acre
non section 10 —
wetland
Wetland 9 (w9)
35 490
-80503
PF01 B
0 02 acre
non section 10 —
wetland
Wetland 10 (w10)
35 490
-80497
PF01 C
0 04 acre
non section 10 —
wetland

NC DWn Stream Identification Form Version 4.11 S9
Date �`�� I�
Project/Site
Latitude
Evaluator � �
County
Longitude . 50,gl s
Total Points:
t� Q
Stream Determination (circl
Other C*'NR
Stream is at least intermittent
Stream
�4 %
Ephemeral Intermittent erennia
e g Quad Name: �*
if 19 or perennial rt z 30'
2
3
A Geomorphology Subtotal = At )
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
13 Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
3
2 Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
2
3
3 In- channel structure ex riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple-pool se uence
0
1
02
3
4 Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
1
3
5 Active /relictfloodplain
0
1
1
3
6 Depositional bars or benches
0
1
2
1
7 Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
3
8 Headcuts
15
1
3
9 Grade control
0
05
26 Wetland plants in streambed
1 5
10 Natural valley
0
05
1
11 Second or greater order channel
No = 0
Yes
a artificial ditches are not rated, see discussions in manual
B. Hvdmloov (Subtotal = II )
12 Presence of Baseflow
0
1
2
Ob
13 Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
2
3
14 Leaf litter
1
0D
05
0
15 Sediment on plants or debris
0
05
1
1
16 Organic debris Imes or piles
0
05
1
22 Fish
17 Sod ,based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
Yes 3
C Bloloav (Subtotal= 101t5 )
18 Fibrous roots in streambed
2
1
0
19 Rooted upland plants in streambed
2
1
0
20 Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
1
3
21 Aquatic Mollusks
0
2
3
22 Fish
0
0
1
1 5
23 Crayfish
0
1
15
24 Amphibians
0
1
15
25 Algae
05
1
1 5
26 Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0 75, OBL = 1 5
Other 0
'perennial streams may also be identified using other methods See p 35 of manual
Notes JKuawoL,4 _,r6 1Ch&TeK rtArVoq.& Q_9XW_
ti?cits ai: -1
Sketch�I� ayt`
s1 keai

NC'. DWO Stream identificatinn Fnrm Vercinn 4 -11 4",n
Date: a`�I ��
ProjectlSite Tjwv-s
Latitude IS16'
Evaluator,
County cwt
Longitude.
Fng
1
1
,
Total Points:
Stream Determination (circle one)
Other („hook
Stream is at feast intermittent /1 fj
Ephemeral ntermitt t Perennial
e g Quad Name
if a 19 or perennial if 2:30* (�
0
'p
A Geomorphology Subtotal =
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
,a Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
3
2 Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1D
2
3
3 In- channel structure ex nffle -pool, step -pool,
n le ool sequence
0
V
2
3
4 Particle size of stream substrate
0
3
2
3
5 Active /relict floodplain
0
8
2
3
6 Depositional, bars or benches
0
05
2
3
7 Recent`alluvial deposits
0
0
2
3
8 Headcuts
25 Algae
1
2
3
9 Grade control
0
0
1
1 5
10 Natural valley
0
05
1
Notes Tic, o
11 Second or greater order channel
No =
Yes = 3
artificial ditches are not rated, see discussions in manual
B. Hvdroloov (Subtotal = fi,'6 )
12 Presence of Baseflow
0
(D
2
3
13 Iron oxidizing bacteria
19 Rooted upland plants in streambed
1
2
3
14 Leaf litter
1 5
1
5
0
15 Sediment on plants or debris
0
21 Aquatic Mollusks
1
1 5
16 Organic debris lines or piles
0
3
1
15
17 Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
Yes - (735'
C Bloloov (Subtotal = U,5 )
18 Fibrous roots in streambed
3
1
0
19 Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
1
0
20 Macrobenthos,(note diversity and abundance)
1
2
3
21 Aquatic Mollusks
1
2
3
22 Fish
05
1
1 5
23 Crayfish
05
1
1 5
24, Amphibians
0
ft
1
1 5
25 Algae
b-5
1
1 5
26 Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0 75, OBL = 1 5 Other 0
'perennial streams may also be identified using other methods See p 35 of manual
Notes Tic, o
P wmr-ktS
i
\14
Sketch
ga

XTd" "III" C!+ ---- T...,-m V­;­ d 11 clr_1
Date a` �7l
Project/Site irk
Latitude
Evaluator, tom. Sv 3
County
Longitude N41513
Total' Points:
Stream Determination (circle one)
Other OA'MA'
Stream is at least intermittent
Stream
r
Ephemeral Intermittent enmi
e g Quad Name ki�,6
if 19 or perennial rt 30'
05
3
A Geomorphology Subtotal = a,
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
1a Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
3
2 Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
05
3
3 In- channel structure ex riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple-pool sequence
0
1
CJ
3
4 Particle,size of stream substrate
0
1
1
3
5 Active /relict floodplam
0
1
1
3
6 Depositional bars or benches
0
1
1
3
7 Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
1
3
8 Headcuts
1
2
3
9 Grade control
0
05
1
10 Natural valley
0
05
1
11 Second or greater order channel
No = 0
Yes 3
`artificial ditches are not rated, see discussions in manual
D U .., i.,.,.. /C,.Mr.rol - Q 1
12, Presence of Baseflow
0
1
2
3
13 Iron oxidizing bacteria
1
2
3
14 Leaf litter
15
1
05
0
15 Sediment on plants or debris
0
05
1 5
16 Organic debris lines or piles
0
06
1
1 5
17 Sod -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
Yes
r` Q,..1...... /O. d.1..F.,1 -
18 , Fibrous roots in streambed
2
1
0
19 Rooted upland plants in streambed
2
1
0
20 Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
2
3
21 Aquatic Mollusks
0
1
3
22 Fish
0
05
1 5
23 Crayfish
0
1
1 5
24 Amphibians
0
85
1
1 5
25 Algae
05
1
15
26 Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0 75, OBL = 1 5 Other 0
perennial, streams may also be identified using other methods See p 35 of manual
Notes CH
5 -
L
Sketch FI i
r/
>

NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11 S
Date- ` I,�t
Project/Site I�uV f
Latitude, —
Evaluator-
County
Longitude. I
Total Points:
Stream Determination (circle one)
Other Ci tIMA
Stream is at least intermittent
Ephemeral rmitt t Perennial
e g Quad Name Jr
a�
if? 19 or erennial if? 30' d
2
3
A. Geomorphology Subtotal = 5
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
la Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
3
2 Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
®
2
3
3 In- channel structure ex nffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple-pool se uence
0
21 Aquatic Mollusks
2
3
4 Particle size of stream substrate
0
01
2
3
5 Active /relict floodplain
0
1
1 5
3
6 Depositional bars or benches
0
1
2
3
7 Recent alluvial deposits
0
0
2
3
8 Headcuts
25 Algae
1
2
3
9 Grade control
15
05
1
1 5
10 Natural valley
0
05
1
1
11 Second or greater order channel
No 40
Yes = 3
a artificial ditches are not rated, see discussions in manual
B Hydroloqy (Subtotal= `}
12 Presence of Baseflow
0
1
0
3
13 Iron oxidizing bacteria
0 )
1
2
3
14 Leaf litter
1 5
20 Maorobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
05
0
15 Sediment on plants or debris
0
21 Aquatic Mollusks
1
15
16 Organic debris lines or piles
0
3
1
15
17 Sod -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
Yes
C Bioloqy (Subtotal= G,S )
18 Fibrous roots in streambed
2
1
0
19 Rooted upland, plants in streambed
3
2
1
0
20 Maorobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
1
2
3
21 Aquatic Mollusks
1
2
3
22 Fish,
05
1
1 5
23 Crayfish
05
1
1 5
24 Amphibians
0
0
1
1 5
25 Algae
0
05
1 1G
15
26 Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0 75, OBL = 1 5 Other= 0
'perennial streams may also be identified using other methods See p 35 of manual
Notes -r
'� r w
3
Sketch
x w3
t- e2s3�yp

NC DW Stream Identification Form Version 4.11 S b
Date
�� W ��+
Project/Site
bTg_�'r
Latitude x15,6 G
Evaluator �m
County:
Longitude
Total Points:
Stream Determination (circle one)
Other N wA,
Stream is at least intermittent
13 '�5
emera ntermittent Perennial
e g Quad Name CAITAW
if >_ 19 or Perennial if 30'
2
3
A Geomorphology Subtotal = )
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
1a Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
3
2 Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
2
3
3 In- channel structure ex riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple-pool se uence
/�,
lJ
1
2
3
4 Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
2
3
5 Active /relict floodplain
0
1
2
3
6 Depositional bars or benches
1
2
3
7 Recent alluvial deposits
1
1
2
3
8 Readcuts
0
1
2
3
9 Grade control
0
1
1 5
10 Natural valley
0
05
1
1 5
11 Second or greater order channel
No
Yes =.3
a artificial ditches are not rated, see discussions in manual
R I-Ivrirnlnmi (Subtotal = 11 1
12 Presence of Baseflow
0
t_J
2
3
13 Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
1
2
3
14 Leaf litter
1 5
1
5
0
15 Sediment on plants or debris
1
05
1
1 5
16 Organic debris lines or piles
0
0
1
1 5
17 Sod -based evidence of high water table'?
No = 0
Yes =
C Rinlo Subtotal =
18 Fibrous roots in streambed
3
1
0
19 Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
2
1
0
20 Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0)
1
2
3
21 Aquatic Mollusks
1
2
3
22' Fish
Q
05
1
1 5
23 Crayfish
OQ
05
1
1 5
24 Amphibians
0
1
1 5
25 Algae
0
1
1 5
26 Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0 75, OBL = 1 5
Other = 0
'perennial streams may also be identified using other methods Seep 35 of manual
Notes Cr i Ng v- -f
Sketch ®1 ��26�n
i

NC DWn Stream identification Form Version 4.11 -11
Date,
Absent
Weak
Project/Site nv`g'
Latitude. '�cf�
Evaluator. �b"
County Cw"w'A5
Longitude-
Total Points:
Stream least
Stream Determination (cir
Other
is at intermittent �1
3a
Ephemeral Intermittent erenni
e g Quad Name
if ? 19 or perennial if z 30'
3 In- channel structure ex riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple-pool se uence
0
A Geomorphology (Subtotal = 16,0 )
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
12 Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
3
2 Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
2
3
3 In- channel structure ex riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple-pool se uence
0
it
2
3
4 Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
1
3
5 Active /relict floodplain
No = 0
1
2
3
6 Depositional bars or benches
0
1
1 5
3
7 Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
3
8 Headcuts
0
1
2
3
9 Grade control
0
15
1
1 5
10 Natural valley
0
05
1
1 5
11 Second or greater order channel
No = 0
Yes 3
- artificial ditches are not rated, see discussions in manual
B Hvdrolnav (Subtotal = Q.r-, )
12 Presence of Baseflow
0
1
`1
3
13 Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
1
0
3
14 Leaf litter
1 5
1
05
0
15 Sediment on plants or debris
0
(0-D
1
1 5
16 Organic debris lines or piles
0
05
1
1 5
17 Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
Yes 3
C Rinlnnv (Subtotal = 4 1
18 Fibrous roots in streambed
3
M
1
0
19 Rooted upland'plants in streambed
2
1
0
20 Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
2
3
21 Aquatic Mollusks
1
2
3
22 Fish
05
1
1 5
23 Crayfish
05
1
15
24 Amphibians
0
05
0
15
25 Algae
05
1
15
26 Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0 75, OBL = 1 5 Other
'perennial streams may also be identified using other methods See p 35 of manual
Notes
F_LF
Sketch
1

NC DWn Stream Identification Form Version 4.11 I: --
Date ' '
Project/Site " R4YsD
Latitude �S
Evaluator, R� 6VI iS K tA �
County
Longitude -
Total Points:
Stream Deter circle one)
Other
Stream is at least intermittent a'J
Ephemera termitt Perennial
e g Quad Name
if z 19, or perennial if ? 30'
2
3
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal =--AD_
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
1 a Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
0
3
2 Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
2
3
3 In- channel structure ex riffle -pool, step -pool,
ni "le- ool sequence
0
1
2
3
4 Particle size of stream substrate
0
0
2
3
5 Active /relict floodplam
No = 0
1
2
3
6 Depositional bars orbenches
0
1
n
3
7 Recent alluvial deposits
0
2
3
8 Headcuts
0
1
2
3
9 Grade control
0
1
1
15
10 Natural valley
0
05
1
15
11 Second or greater order channel
No
Yes = 3
a artificial ditches are not rated, see discussions in manual
R Hvcirnlonv (Subtotal = 1
12 Presence of Baseflow
0
1
(e
3
13 Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
1
2
3
14 Leaf litter
1 5
1
5
0
'15 Sediment on plants or debris
0
1
1
1 5
16 Organic debris lines or piles
0
0
1
15
17 Soil -based evidence of high water table9
No = 0
Yes
C Rinlnnv (Suhtntel = 0
18 Fibrous roots in streambed
3
1
0
19 Rooted upland plants in streambed
2
1
0
20 Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
1
2
3
21 Aquatic Mollusks
®
1
2
3
22 Fish
�j0
05
1
15
23 Crayfish
05
1
1 5
24 Amphibians
0
05
1
1' 5
25 Algae
0
05
1
15
26 Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0 75, OBL = 1 5
Other
'perennial streams may also be identified using other methods See p 35 of manual
Notes 15wf -rb DA
%­
' F14f., k
Sketch
.a�
V

V(' nWtl Ctraam TrlPntifteatinn l nrm Vvrcinn d 11 IR
Date-
Project/Site &IZ$4drR- VAND
Latitude
Evaluator: 3
County
Longitude. -�
Total Points: -
Stream Determination (c
Other
Stream is at least intermittent '
Ephemeral Intermltte erenni
e g Quad Name: �`Q}iLao
if >_ 19 or perennial if? 30' f i�j
2
3
A Geomorphology (Subtotal
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
V Continuity-of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
3
2 Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
2
3
3 In- channel structure ex nfFle -pool, step -pool,
ri le ool sequence
0
05
2
3
4 Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
1
3
5 Active /relict - floodplain
0
Yes
2
3
6 Depositional bars or benches
0
1
W
3
7 Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
2
1
8 Headcuts
24 Amphibians
1
2
3
9 Grade control
0
1.5
1
15
10 Natural valley
0
05
1
1 5
11 Second or greater order channel
No = 0
Yes 3
° artificial ditches are not rated, see discussions in manual
R HvrimInnv t .quhtntal = C 1
12 Presence of Baseflow
0
1
2
O3
13_ Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
1
2
3
14 Leaf litter
1
05
0
15 Sediment on plants or debris
0
05
©
1 5
16 Organic debris Imes or piles
0
0
1
1 5
17 Sod -based evidence,of high water table?
No = 0
Yes
f- Rinlnnv tGi ihtntal = Q 1
18 Fibrous roots in streambed
2
1
0
19 Rooted upland plants in streambed
2
1
0
20 Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
2
3
21 Aquatic Mollusks
0
1
2
3
22 Fish
0
1
15
23 Crayfish
U-5
1
15
24 Amphibians
0
1
1.5
25 Algae
0
05
1
1 5
26 Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0 75, OBL = 1 5
Other
'perennial streams may also be identified using other methods See p 35 of manual
Notes 1& o
o
e+i ' V 'S '�
Gi No P -,PAr4 ,G
Sketch
Aei

xid- "All" Qt-..-- Fnrm Varcinn d 11 -.Iq
Date
Absent
Project/Site
Latitude. D
Evaluator
County:
Longitude -�
Total Points:
Stream Deterritination circle
(
Other �"W_
Stream is at least intermittent �
Ephemeral lntermitten erenni
e g Quad Name. Pl fAJV4,1-
if >, 19 or perennial if a 30'
3
3 In- channel structure ex riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple-pool sequence
A Geomorphology (Subtotal =
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
1a Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
3
2 Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
0
3
3 In- channel structure ex riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple-pool sequence
0
1
©
3
4 Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
3
5 Active /relict floodplain
0
1
3
3
6 Depositional bars or benches
0
1
1
3
7 Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
2
3
8 Headcuts
M
1
2
3
9 Grade,control
0
05
1
5
10 Natural valley
0
05
1
1 5
11 Second or greater order channel
No = 0
Yes
° artificial ditches are not rated, see discussions in manual
o u..A i,.,.., ic..tif,.i.,i - 0 1
12 Presence of Baseflow
0
1
2
2
13 Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
1
2
3
14 Leaf litter
15
1
05
0
15 Sediment on plants or debris
0
05
1
15
16 Organic debris lines or piles
0
05
1 5
17 Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
Yes
3
18 Fibrous roots in streambed
2
1
0
19 Rooted upland plants in streambed
2
1
0
20 Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
1
2
3
21 Aquatic Mollusks
0
1
2
3
22 Fish
0
1
15
23 Crayfish
0
®
1
1 5
24 Amphibians
0
1
15
25 Algae
0
1
15
26 Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0 75, OBL = 1 5 Other
'perennial streams may also be identified using other methods See p 35 of manual
Notes Rrsi,nzntc c
-tit'
t�tcf
'S'
y
Sketch 1 5q
I
t
i
I
a

NC DWn Stream identification Form Version 4.11 -JD
Date ` lr+/.t
d!
Project/Site
Latitude. 5si qm
Evaluator: `
Plw � 3 aNr
County:
C41WOW,
Longitude
'�.4%
Total Points:
Stream De te a 'on (circle one)
Other Kv�%wf
Stream is at least intermittent
if a 19 or if? 30•
Ephemeral nt itte Perennial
e g Quad Name:
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal =-L5-i
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
1a Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
3
2 Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
05
3
3 In- channel structure ex nffle -pool, step -pool,
n le I sequence
0
1
2
3
4 Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
2
3
5 Activetrelict floodplain
0
1
2
15
6 Depositional bars -or benches
0
2
3
7 Recent alluvial deposits
0
2
3
8 Headcuts
0
1
a
1 3
-9 Grade control
0
15
1
1 5
10 Natural valley
FACW = 0 75, OBL = 1 5 Other = 0
05
1
1 5
11 Second or greater order channel
No
Yes = 3
artificial ditches are not rated, see discussions in manual
B Hvdminav (Subtotal = Cl 1
12 Presence of Baseflow
0
1
2
3
13 Iromoxidizing bacteria
0
1
3
14 Leaf litter
1_5
6
05
0
15 Sediment on plants or debris
0
05
21 Aquatic Mollusks
15
16 Organic debris lines or piles
0
05
3
15
17 Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
Yes
G Bioloov (Subtotal = /n 1
18 Fibrous roots in streambed
2
1
0
19 Rooted upland plants in streambed
2
1
0
20 Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
OD
1
2
3
21 Aquatic Mollusks
1
2
3
22 Fish
05
1
15
23 Crayfish
05
1
15
24 Amphibians
05
1
15
25 Algae
05
1
15
26 Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0 75, OBL = 1 5 Other = 0
'perennial streams may also be identified using other methods See p 35 of manual
'Notes - o .a
F
l x4-5'
EAU V- >
' -14
Sketch
5, v

`f
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
Project/Site Barrier Road 100 kV •T,ap;Tranmission Line _ Crty /County Rockwell/Rowan_ sampling Date: 2/26/2014__
Applicant/Owner Duke Energy _ State NC Sampling Pomt dPi
Investigator(s) Eric,Mularski &_Matt McKinney Section, Township, Range, -__ _
Landform Oillslope, terrace, etc): hill §lope___ Local relief (concave, convex, none) .concave slope ( %) <2
Subregion (LRR or MLRA) LRRP Lat W507 Long -80 514 Datum - - - -- - T -
Sod Map Unit Name,, DoB - Doguefineaandy loam, 2 -to 6% slopes, rarely flooded'- NWI classification none _
Are climatic / hvdrolo is conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes ❑No (If no, explain in Remarks-)
Are.Vegelatior ell, Soil ❑ or Hydrology'❑ significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes = - No ❑'
Are Vegetation Sod ❑ or Hydrology ❑ naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in,Remarks )
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, Important reatures, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes = Ng Is the'Sampled Area
Hydnc Sod - Present? Yes Nos - .1 i within a Wetland? Yes No ❑
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No ❑
Remarks
Scrub -shrub wetland (w1) located in the floodplain of an unnamed tributary to Dutch Buffalo Creek (s1)
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators
Secondary Indicators, (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minim_ um of one is required check all,thayapplly)
❑ Surface Sod Cracks (136)
❑ Surface Water (A1) -
❑ True Aquatic Plants (B14)
❑ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
Q:High Water Table (A2)
❑ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
❑ Drainage Patterns (1310)
'®'Satu4lion,(A3)
❑ Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
❑ Moss Trim Lines (1316)
❑ Water Marks (B1)
"❑y 'Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
❑ Dry- Season Water Table (C2)
❑ Sediment Deposits (62)
❑ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Sods (C6)
❑ Crayfish, Burrows (C8)
❑ Drift beposits (63)
❑ Thin Muck Surface (C7)
❑ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
❑ Algal'Mat or Crust (B4)
❑ Other (Explain in Remarks)
❑ Stunted or Stressed Plants (131)
Iron Deposits (B5)
❑ Geomorphic Position (D2)
Zinundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
❑ Shallow Aguitard (D3)
❑Water= StaineclTeaVes (69)
❑ Microtopographic Relief (D4)
❑Aquatic Fauna (B13)
❑ FAC- Neutral Test (D5)
_Field,Ohservatfons
-
Surface Water Present? Yes a]
No,❑ Depth (inches) 1-6
Water Table'Present? Yes 0
No ❑ Depth (inches) 24
0 I
II =
Saturation Present Yes ❑
No= Depth (inches)
Wetland
Hydrology Present? Yes No
° inciudes ca`d!a
I
1
-
Descnbe Recorded Data (stream gauge., monitoring well,zaerial photos; previous inspections), -,if available
Remarks.
Primary wetland hydrology indicators are present.
US Army Corps of Engineers
Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2 0

VtGt I A I IUM tvive Strata) - use sclentltic names Ot plants.
Point t
Tree Stra-tum (Plot size ) Cover Species Status
Number of Dominant Species
1' That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC 3 (A)
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2 0
Total Number of,Dommant
3` - - - _ _ _ -_ _ _ -
Species Across Al I, Strata 3 (B)
- 20% of total cover __—
~--- - - - -_-- - � - - - -- --•-� --- -
OBL species x 1 =
-- -- - - - - -
Pement of Dunun int Speces
I - -- -
That,Are OBL, FACW, or FAC 100
20 Yes FAC
' FACW species x2 =
= Total Cover
Prevalence Index worksheet
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2 0
- - - -
Total-9/6 Cover of --multiply by
509'° of total cover
- 20% of total cover __—
~--- - - - -_-- - � - - - -- --•-� --- -
OBL species x 1 =
Sapling Stratum (Plot size 15 -ft j
I - -- -
1 Liquidambar styraciflua— - -
20 Yes FAC
' FACW species x2 =
z "Ater rubnim
No - FAC_
FACtspecies x 3 = _
_ _
3 Jurnperus ytrginiana _ _
_5 _
5 No FACU
FACU species x 4
_
! 4 -- - - -
r
UPL species x 5 =
_ - --
-- -
- -
- - - - - --
Column Totals (A) (B)
6
Prevalence Index = B/A
30 _ = Total Cover
Hydrophytic Vegetation indicators•
50% of total cover 15
20% of total cover 6 _ _ _
❑ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
Shrub Stratum (Plot size 15 -k _ __�
❑ 2 - Dominance Test is >50 %
1 Rubus sp_
30 Yes NI
❑ 3 - Prevalence Index is 93 0'
2-
❑ 4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Problematic, Hydrophytic 'Vegetation' (Explain)
_
4
6 --- - -- - - -
- - - -
i'Indicators of hydric sod and wetland hydrology must
__
hp pfpspnl, iinlpss diSliirhprl nr rrn6lemahr
30 _ =Total Cover
Definitions of Five Vegetation Strata
50% of total cover 15
_ 20% of total cover 6
�
T"7 - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
Herb Stratum (Plot size .? =ft- -- - - - A
approxmately 20 R (6m) or 'more-in height and 3 in
1- Juncos effusus
20 Yes FACW
(7 6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH)
2_Carex Sp: ^- f
20 -Yes -NI
Sapling - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
3• Sphagnum sp: _ _ _ _ _
20 Yes- _ , NI
approximately 20 It (sum) of more m,heighl and less
4.Andropogon gerardu — _ _
20___ Yes _ FAC y
than 3 in (7 6 cm) DBH
5 - - -
-
Shrub - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
6 - - - - -"
- -
approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) in height
7. -
-
Herb - All herbaceous (non - woody) plants, including
8 _ _ _
__
herbaceous vines, regardless of size, and woody
9._
plants, „except'Woody vines, less than approximately 3
'ft
_ _- - — - -- - - - -- -- -
_ - - -- -
(1 m) in height
t1 07
11, -- - - - - - --
-
Woody vine - All woody vines, regardless of height
-
80 = Total Cover
- - - - -- - - -- T --
501/o of total cover 40
2011. of total cover 16
Woody,Vine Stratum (Plot size
1
2.
3. -
- - -
-
5-
Hydrophytic
- -
- -
= Total Cover
Vegetation
Present? Yesi
50% of total cover
20% of total cover
Remarks (Include photo numbers'here or on a separate sheet )
Hydrophytic vegetation is dominant
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2 0

9
SOIL Sampling Point, dp1
Profile Description (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator, or confirm the absence of indicators)
Depth'„ - - - =Matrix - _
lnches) Color (mois't) - % -
_ — Redox Features -
Color (moist) �/ — Type Lac Texture -
E 0 =8 _ _ _ _ 10YR 5/2 _ _93Tti
10YR 2/1 _ 2__ C_ _ M _ clay loam" _ T
_
7 5YR,4/4 5 RM M
8 -22 10YR 7/1 60
10YR 6/8 40 C M clay loam
"T`p e- C =Concentiati6n, D= De-Ienon.,RM= Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked'Sand Grains T-._ 2Locanon PL =Pore Lining. M =Matrix
H'�dric Soil Iridicators -
_
"Y _ Indicators for Problematic Hydric Sods':
Histosol (Al)
❑ Dark Surface (S7) ❑ 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
_�
_❑ Histic Epipedon (A2)
❑ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148) ❑ Coast Prairie Redox (A116)
❑ Black Histic (A3)
❑ Thin Dark -Surface (S9) (MLRA'147, 148) (MLRA 147, 148)
❑ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
❑; Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) El Piedmont Floodplam Sods (F19)
- ❑ Stratified Layers (A5)
Depleted Matrix (F3) (MLRA 136, 147)
�❑ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
❑ Redox Dark Surface (F6) ❑ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
❑ Depleted Below Dark Surface (A71)
❑ Depleted Dark Surface (F7) ❑ Other (Explain in Remarks)
❑ Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
❑ Redox Depressions (F8)
❑ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N,
❑ Iron- Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 147, 148)
MLRA 136)
❑ Sandy GleyediMatrix (S4)
❑ Urnbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122) 'Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
❑ Sandy Redox (S5)
❑ Piedmont Floodplain,Soils (F19) (MLRA_ 148) wetland;hydrology must be present,
E] Stripped Matrix (S6)
❑ Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147) unless disturbed or problematic
Type ZLDepth (inches): - [HXd!!-c Soil Present? Yes No
marks -
Hydric,soil indicators are present
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2 0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
Project/Site Barrier Road 100 kV Tap Tranmission Line City/county Rockwell /Rowan Sampling Date 2126/2014
Applicant owner Duke Energy State, NC Sampling Point dp2
Investigator(s) , Eric Mularski & Matt McKinney__ _ Section, Township, Range _
Landform,(hillslope, terrace, etc) hillslope _ _ _ Local relief (concave, convex, none), - _ _ _ Slope ( %) <2
Subregion,(LRR or MLRA)• LRRP� Lac 35 507 Long;. -80 514_ _ _ _ _ Datum
Soil neap Unit Name: DoB - Dogue fine sandy,loarn, 2 t6,6% slope's, rarely flooded Nwl aassIecai�on none
Are climatic / h Plod= `onditions on the site,typic(al�f�ordh�s time of years Yes ❑✓ No (If no, explain in Remarks)
Are Vegetatiood ❑• or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" presents Yes ❑✓ No ❑
Are, Vegetation or Hydrology, lf� -1 naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point - locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes F✓ No Is the Sampled Area
Hydnc Sod Presents Yes ❑ �No J withima Wetland? Yes ❑ No 0
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes= No'I y ,
Remarks
Upland data point for scrub -shrub wetland (w1)
HYDROLOGY
-Wetland Hydrology Indicators
Secondary Indicators, (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required check'all that auolyl -
❑ "Surface Sod cracks (B6)
_ J
❑ Surface Water'(A1)T T ❑ True Aquatic Plants (M 4)
❑ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (68)
❑ High Water Table (A2) ❑ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1)
❑ Drainage Patterns (610)
❑ Saturation (A3) ❑ Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
[] Moss Trim Lines (B16)
❑ Water Marks (137) ❑ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
❑ Dry- Season Water Table (C2)
;❑ Sediment Deposits (132) [:],Recent Iron Reduction in Tdle&Soils (C6)
[:]'Crayfish Burrows (C8)
❑ Drift Deposits (13) ❑ Thin Muck Surface�(C7)
❑ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
❑ Algal Mal or Crust (64) ❑ Other (Explain in Remarks)
❑ Stunted or Stressed Plants (61)
❑ Iron Deposds,(135)
❑ Geomorphic Position (D2)
❑ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (87)
[_],Shallow Aqudard (D3)
p Water- Slained;Leaves (69)
❑ Microtopographic Relief (D4)
❑Aquatic'Fauna (B13)
❑ FAC- Neutral Test (1315)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes ❑ No Q Depth (inches)
I `Water Table Present? Yes= No Qi Depth (inches)
❑ No Fl/ `
Saturation Presenter Y,es ❑ No ,Depth (inches)
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes
includes capillary fringe)
-
-Describe Recorded Data "(stream'gauge'monitonng well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available
Remarks
lNo primary or secondary wetland hydrology Indicators are present
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2 0

vtGt 1 A 1 IUN (Five Strata) - use scientific names of
Tree Stratum (Plot size ) % Cover Species? Status
2-
3 - - - -_ - - - - -_ = -- - - --
4
Sampling Point
Number of Dominant Species 3
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC (A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata 3 (B)
Percent or Domndnt Species 100 ,
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC (A/B)
-- Total%=Cover of _ _ - Multiply by
OBL species
50°/. of total cover
i Sapling Stratum (Plot size 15_ft -
1 Liqul'dambar styraciflua
= Total Cover
20% of total cover
20 Yes FAC
.2 Acer rubrum _ _ - _
3 Juniperus virginiana_ _
5 _ _No FAC .
5 — _ No FACU,
x 3 = - -
FACU species
x4=- - T
UPL species
x 5 = _
Column Totals
50% of total cover 15
Shrub Stratum (Plotsize
1 Rubussp
30 -_ = Total Cover
i
20% of total cover 6
30 Yes NI
80 = Total Cover
20% of total cover 16-
-- -
3. -
4.
---------
6- -- - - --
- — - -
30 = Total Cover
Sampling Point
Number of Dominant Species 3
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC (A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata 3 (B)
Percent or Domndnt Species 100 ,
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC (A/B)
-- Total%=Cover of _ _ - Multiply by
OBL species
x 1 =
FACW species
x 2 =
FAC species
x 3 = - -
FACU species
x4=- - T
UPL species
x 5 = _
Column Totals
(A) (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A =-
❑ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophyuc vegetation
❑ 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
❑ 3 - Prevalence Index is s3 0'
❑,4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide, supporting
data in'Remarks or on a separate sheet)
❑ Problematic Hydrophyuc vegetation' (Explain)
'Indicators of;hydnc sod and wetland hydrology must
ha present, unless disturbed or problematic
50% of total cover 15
Herb Stratum (Plot s¢e 5-ft _ _ - -)
1 ,Juncus effusus
20% of total cover 6
20 Yes FACW
Tree r Woody;plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and 3 in
(7 16 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH)
Sapling -Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less
than 3 in (7 6 cm) DBH
Shrub - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) in height
Herb - All herbaceous (non- woody) plants, including
herbaceous vines, regardless or size, and woody
i plants, excepi woody vines, less than approximately 3
ft (1 m) in height
Woody vine - All woody vines regardless of height
2,Carex sp L -- - 20 YeS NI
3 Spagnum sp . _ _ _ 20 Yes NI _ _
4 Andropogbn gerardu 20 Yes FAC_ _
5--
_ - _
6 -
7 - -
g.- _ _ __ - -_ ___ _ __ _ _
-
91
10
11
50% of total cover 40
80 = Total Cover
20% of total cover 16-
-- -
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size
1,
Z.
3. -
4. -
i
5. - - - - -- - - - -- Hydrophyuc
= Total Cover Vegetation
50% of total cover 20% of total cover Present? Yes n No=
Remarks (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet)
Hydrophyuc vegetation is dominant
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2 0

I
i
a
SOIL
to
Sampling Point dp2
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color- (moist) % TypeL Loc' Texture _ L Remarks —
0= 6 10YR_5 /3 100 _ _ .clay loam
6 -22 - 101(R 2i 80 10YR 6/8 20 C M clay loam
'Tune C= Concentration D =De letion RM= Reduced Matrix MS= Masked Sand Grains _ ?Location P-L =Pore Lmin , M= Matrix. _
Hydnc Soil Indicators. �'
— _
-- Indicators foi Problematic Hydric Sods':
0 Histosol (Al)
❑ Dark Surface (S7)
❑ 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
❑ Histic Epipedon (A2)
❑ Polyvalue Below Surface (SB) (MLRA 147, 148)
❑ Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
❑ Black Histic (A3)
❑ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
(MLRA 147, 1,48)
❑ `Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
❑ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
❑ Piedmont Floodplain Sods (F19)
❑ Stratified Layers (A5)
❑ Depleted Matrix (F3)
(MLRA 136, 147)
❑ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
❑ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
❑ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
❑ Depleted Below Dark Surface (A71)
.❑ Depleted Dark Surface (0)
r] Other (Explain in Remarks)
❑ Thick Dark Surface (Al 2)
D Redox Depressions (F8)
i❑ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N,
❑ Iron - Manganese, Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 147, 148)
MLRA 136)
❑ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
❑ Umbnc Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122)
'Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
❑ Sandy Redox (S5)
❑ Piedmont Floodplain Sods (F19) (MLRA 148)
wetland hydrology must be present,
❑ Stripped Matrix (S6)
Red Parent Material (F21),(MLRA 127, 147)
unless disturbed or problematic
Type, - - -
Depth'(inches) - - -
No hydric soil indicators are present
US Army Corps of Engineers
Sod Present? Yes ❑ No
Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2 0
=.

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Eastern Mountains and Pledmont'Region
Projectl5ite Barrier Road 100 kV Tap Tranmission Line City/County Rockwell /Rowan _ sampling Date 2/26/2014
Applicant/Owner, Duke-Energy _ _ _ State NC Sampling Point dp3
Investigator(s) Eric Mularski &,Matt McKinney Section, Township,,Range
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc ) depression , Local relief (concave, convex, none) concave _ Slope ( %) <1
Subregion (LRR or MLRA) , LRRP _ Lat 35-607 Long -80 514- - Datum
Soil Map Unit Name. CtiA - Chewa6la'15arn„ 0 to 2 %'s1o" es;.ffe uentiy,;flooded_ NWI classification .none
Are,climatic t h ofo is conditions on the site,typiial "for:Ihis,time of year? Yes � No _ (If no, explain in Remarks )
Are,Vegetatio4 i'Sod'I� or Hydrology - significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes No
Are Vegetation Sod L I• or Hydrology naturally problematic ?' (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks )
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes �F✓ 'No' Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Sod Present? Yes.] v '! No �„ within alWetla id? Yes 0✓ No 0
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes , ✓ No
'Remarks
'Small forested wetland (w2) located in the floodplain of an unnamed tributary of Dutch Buffalo Creek (s1)
a
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrologyllndicators icators (minimum of two reouired)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required,rcheck all that apply) -
❑ Surface Sod Cracks 136)
❑ Surface -Water (Al) ❑ True Aquatic Plants (614)
❑ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
QVHigh Water Table (A2) ❑ Hydrogen Sulfide,Odor (C7)
❑ Drainage Patterns (610)
l
E] 'Saturation (A3) ❑ Oxidized Rhizospheres on,Living Roots (0)
Q Moss Tnm Lines (616)
I
4Q�Water Marks(61) ❑ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
❑ Dry- Season Water Table (C2) a
Q Sediment Deposits'(82) ❑ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled_ Soils (C6)
❑ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
❑ Drift Deposits (83) ❑ Thin Muck Surface (C7)
❑ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
❑ Algal Mat or Crust (B4) ❑Other (Explain in Remarks)
❑Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
Q Iron,Deposits (135)
❑ Geomorphic Position (D2)
riQ Inundation Visible,on Aenal,lmagery (87)
❑ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
Water - Stained Leaves (69)
DMicrotopographic Relief (D4)
A quatic Fauna (613) _
❑ FAC- Neutral Test (D5)
-Field Observations -"
I
I�
IfSurface Water Present? Yes No 0 Depth (inches) 0
I I,Water Table Present? Yes Q No ® Depth (inches) 6
4
II
j:Saluration Present? Yes Q No= Depth (inches)
Wetland
Hydrology Present? Yes No
:,(includes capillary fringe)
- — - -- _
oDescribe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos,'prewous inspections), if available - — - -' -` - - "— `—
- Remarks
;Primary and secondary wetland hydrology indicators are present.
,
— - --
i
t
- - — - _ -- - _A
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2 0

VEGETATION (Five Strata) - Use scientific names of plants. Sampling Point. dp3
- - -- -'- " ABolute - Dommant Indicator
-ft
Dominance Test worksheet
I Tree Stratum (Plot size _30
96 Cover Species? Status
i Number of Dominant Species
1.Platanus occidentalis
20 Yes FACW
That Are OBL,�FACW, or FAC .7 (A)
_ m
`Total Number of Domant
2. Aces rubrum _ 20_____ Yes FAC
_ _ _
nigra 20 Yes "FACW
3nBefula
7
Across All Strata - (B) ,
= Li uidarrt ar st �aciflua - 20 � Yes FAC_
4_ Q b y
— -
5
"`
Percent of Uommant °Specter
Thdl Ate OBL, FA or FAC 100_ (A/B)
_
_
^ 80 =Total Cover
Prevalence Index worksheet -- - -� -
50% of total cover 40
20% of total cover 16
_ -Total % Cover of MuKtoN by
Pliny Stratum (Plot size 15 -ft )
- -
OBL species x 1 =_
1,1iquldambar styraciflua _
20 _Yes FAC
FACW species x z
FAC species z 3 =
: —
FACU species x 4 = f
UPL species x 5
!
Column Totals - (A) _ (B)
2 Acer rubrum ,10 -Yes_ FAC =_
3 Junip'eru§ vl�gtnlana - - - - - 5 "No FACU
4 Llhodendron- tuhpife_ra- LL 5 'No FACU
- - -
5. _ -
Prevalence Index = B/A -
6- -, - -- -_ - -- - -- :_ ,_
_
40- = Total Cover
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
50% of total cover 20
20% of total cover 8
❑ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
Shrub Stratum (Plot size 15 -ft I
i
; E],-2 - Dominance Test is >50%
❑ 3 Prevalence Index
1
_
- is 53 0'
Q 4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
data,in Rernarks or on a separate sheet)
2 _ _ _ _ _ _ ____ _ _ _ __ ____ __ _
3 _ _
- -
Problematic Hydrophytic vegetation' (Explain)
4
'Indicators,of hydric sod and wetland hydroloqy must
8
- -- i
be present, unless disturbod or problematic
= Total Cover
Definitions of Five Vegetation Strata,
50% of total cover -
5-ft
- 20% of total cover y =
Tree -Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
Herb Stratum (Plot size )
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and 3 in
1,Allium ascalonicum
5 Yes NI
,(7 6 cm) or larger in,diameter at breast height (DBH)
Sapling --Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
2- - - - - -
3 _ __ __ _ __ __ _ -____
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less
than 3 in (7 6 cm) DBH
Shrub - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) in height
Herb- All herbaceous (non - woody); plants,, including
herbaceous vines, regardless of size, and woody
pianis, except woody vines, less than approximately 3
4
5
6
7, - - -- -- ._ -- - - - -
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _i�
g - - - - - -- `- - - -
- - - -
9
- -
ft (1 m) in height
_ _
10 -- -
Woody vine - All woody vines, regardless of height
11
'
- _- - - - -- - -- - - -- -
-5 - - -- Total Cover --
- - - - - - - -
50% of total cover, 25
2o% of total cover 1
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size 30 -ft )
_
1 Lorocera japonica
2 Yes FAC -
Hydrophytic
2 -- - -
3
5 - -
2
= Total Cover
Vegetation
Present) Yes ✓n No=
50% of total cover ,.1
_ 20% of total cover 0 4
Remarks - (Include photo numbers "here or on,a separate
sheet)
- - - - -- - -
Hydrophytic vegetation is dominant
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2 0

SOIL
to the depth needed to
Sampling Point dp3
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Tvoe Loci Texture - Remarks - -- -
0-4 10YR 5/2 -_ 95 10YR 5/6 5 C M _ _ Qlay_loam _
4 -22 10YR 5/2 70 5YR_5%8_ 30 C -M clay loam
C= Concenftbil', D =De letion; RM =Reduced Matrix` MS- Masked Sand Grains - — L , ocation _PL =Pore Lin ___ __
' - -" _ -- Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils'
Hydric;Soiflndicators
0 Histosol (Al)
❑ Dark Surface (S7)
❑ 2 cm Muck,(AlO) (MLRA 147)
❑ Histic Epipedon (A2)
❑ Polyvalue Below Surface (SB),(MLRA 147, 148)
❑ Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
❑ Black Histic (A3)
❑ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
(MLRA 147, 148)
❑ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
❑ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
❑ Piedmont Floodpiain Soils (F19)
❑ Stratified Layers (A5)
,D,Depleted Matrix (F3)
(MLRA 136, 147)
❑ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
ETRedox Dark Surface (F6)
❑ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
I] Depleted Below Dark,Surface (A11)
❑ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
0 Other (Explain in Remarks)
❑ Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
D Redox Depressions (FB)
❑ Sandy Mucky Mineral (51) (LRR_ N,
[] Iron - Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 147, 148)
MLRA 136)
❑ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
❑ Umbric,Surface,(F13) (MLRA 136, 122)
'Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
❑ Sandy Redox (S5)
❑ Piedmont;Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
wetland hydrology must be present,
❑ Stripped,Matnx (S6)
❑ Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147)
unless disturbed or problematic
Type —
Depth (inches)-
marks
Hydric sod indicators are present
US Army Corps of Engineers
Hydric Soil Present? Yes I v I No LJ
Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2 0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM – Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
Project/Site Barrier Road 100 kV Tap Tranmission Line Clty/County Rockwell /Rowan Sampling Date 2/26/2014
Applicant/Owner, Duke Energy Y State NC Sampling Point dp4
Invesbgator(s). -Eric Mularski_& -Matt McKinney Section, Township, Range
Landform (hiilslope, terrace, etc) hillslope - Local relief (concave, convex, none) Convex , Slope ( %) <2
Subregion (LRR or MLRA); LRRP — Lat _35507 Long -80 5147 Datum -
Sod'Map Unit Name ChQ - Chevvacla loa'm,, 0 to 2% slopes, fre `tietitly flooded NWI classification none
Are chmahc / h polo is conditions on thesite,typi -f f -r his time of year? Yes . No (If no, explain in Remarks) (�
Are Vegetation r -3 iSod� =, or Hydrology significantly tlisturbed� Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes ✓0, No U
Are Vegetation' = or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attacn site map, snowing,sampung polnt,loeations, transects, Important features, etc
HydrophyUc Vegetation Present? Yes �✓_ No EA - Is the Sampled Area Hydric Soil Present Yes L1 ,No - u+nthm a Wetland. Yes i0 No - 0
i Wetland Hydrology Present? _ Yes. =_No=
Upland data point for forested wetland (w2)
HYDROLOGY
-Wetland Hydrology Indicators ` _ -- -
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two reaureff
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is re_ auired check all+lhat apply)
❑ Surface Sod Cracks (136)
❑ Surface Water (Al) ❑ True Aquatic Plants (1314) — e
❑ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
❑ High Water Table (A2) ❑ Hydrogen sulfide Odor (C1)
❑,Drainage Patterns (B1 o)
❑ Saturation (A3) ❑ Oxidized Rhizospheres on -Living Roots (0)
❑ Moss Trim Lines (B16)
r❑ Water Marks, (131) ❑ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
❑ Dry- Season Water Table (C2)
❑ Sediment Deposits (62) ❑ RecenLlron Reduction in Tilled Sods (C6)
❑ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
❑ Dnft Deposits, (133) ❑ Thin Muck Surface (0)
❑,Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
❑ Algal Mat or Crust (134) ❑ Other (Explain in Remarks)
❑ Stunted or Stressed Plants (131)
❑ Iron Deposits (85)
❑ Geomorphic Position (152)
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (87)
❑ Shallow Aquit4d (D3)
Water - Stained Leaves (139)
❑ Microtopographic Relief (D4)
❑ Aquatic Fauna (1313)
❑ FAC- Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations
Surface Water Present? Yes Noi -r " -' Depth (inches)
Water Table Present? Yes ® No Q Depth (inches)
^
i
z
Saturation Present? Yes Q No . Depth (inches)
Wetland
Hydrology Present'y Yes= No .
(includes capillary fringe) _
- - - - -- - — —
r,Descnbe Recorded Data (stream'gauge, monitoring well aenal-phlotos; previous, inspecUOns),,if -available-
Remarks
No primary or secondary wetland hydrology Indicators are present.
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2 0

VEGETATION (Five Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Tree Stratum (Plot size 30 -ft )
1 Platanus occidentalis
Absolute Dominant Indicator
over Species? Status
10 Yes FACW
2
3
x 1 =
FACW species
X2= _
FAC
6. - - -
50% of total cover 5
Sapling Stratum (Plot size 15 -ft j
,j;.Acer rubrum Y -
10 = Total Cover
20% of total cover 2
10 Yes FAC
2
x 5 = _
3-
(A) (B)
4.
15 - - —
-
6
50% of total cover -5 - -
'Shrub Stratum (Plot size, 15-ft 1
1
10 - __ _ = Total Cover
- 20% of total cover 2
3 - - - - - -- - --
-
5 ------- - - - - -- -
5
- - --
-
-
50% of total cover ___
Herb Stratum (Plot size -5'(( __ _ _ _)
1,Dichantheliumclandestinum
= Total Cover
20% of total cover .-
30 Yes FAC
2- Microsteg4um yirrineum
20 Yes_ FAC
4 -
5
— -
-
7,
8 +-
11
50%, of total cover 25
50 = Total Cover
20% of total cover 10
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size 30 -ft )
1 Lonicera japonica 5 Yes FAC
3.
4.
5- - - - --
Point,,ap4
Number of Dominant Species
That Are 613i, FACW, or FAC; , 5 (A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across Alf Strata
Percent of Dominant Species
That Aie OBL, FACW; ui FAC
HE
5 = Total Cover
50% of total cover 2 5 20% of total cover 1
Remarks - '(Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet) - - —
Hydrophytic vegetation Is dominant "
5 - (B)
100 (A/e)
Total % Cover of
-
Multiply by
- —
OBL species
x 1 =
FACW species
X2= _
FAC
FACU species
x 4 - _
UPL species
x 5 = _
Column Totals
(A) (B)
valence Index = B/A =
❑ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophybc Vegetation
❑ 2 - Dominance Test is >501/.
❑ 3 - Prevalence Index is 253 0'
❑ 4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate.sheet)
Ej Problematic Hydrophytic vegetation' (E=xplain)
'Indicators of hydnc sod and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic,
Tree - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 fl (6 m) or more in height and 3 in
(7 6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height(I)BI-1)
Sapling - Woody plants, excluding woody'vines,
approximately 20 ft,(6 m) or more in height and less
than 3 in (7 6 cm) DBH
Shrub - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) in height
Herb - All herbaceous (non - woody) plants, including
herbaceous vines, regardless of size, and woody
plants, except woody vines, less than approximately 3
it (1 m) in height
Woody vine - All woody vines, regardless of height 11
Hydrophytic
Vegetation �
Present? Yes I v 1 No=
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2 0

SOIL
Sampling Point, dp4
Profile'Oescriptlon (Describe to the depth needed to document ttie mdtcator'or confirm the absence of Indicators)
Depth Matrix. Redox Features
Griche`s) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Typed' Texture Remarks__
10YR 4/4 .100 _ _ _ _ _ clay loam_ _
3 -22 10YR 5/4 100 clay loam
';T a _C =Concentration, D =De letlon, RM= Reduced Matrix, MS= Masked Sand-Grains _ ucation •.Pk =PoreLAtn hvi Matrix T
• - °° -_ -- - _ - I d' G P bi -t H dri Soils';•
LJ Histosol (A1)
❑ Hishc Epipedon (A2)
❑ Black Histic (A3)
❑ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
❑ Stratified Layers (A5)
❑' 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
❑ Depleted Below Dark Surface (Al 1)
❑ Tliick Dark Surface (Al 2)
❑ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N,
MLRA 147, 148)
❑ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
❑ Sandy Redox (S5)
❑ Stripped Matrix�(S6)
❑ Dark Surface (S7)
❑ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
❑ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147,148)
❑ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
❑ Depleted Matrix (F3)
D Redox Dark Surface (F6)
❑ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
❑ Redox Depressions (F8)
❑ Iron - Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N.
MLRA 136)
❑ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122)
❑ Piedmont Floodplain Sods (F19) (MLRA 148)
Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA,127, 147)
Type,--- —
Depth (inches) = --
marks
No hydric soil indicators are present
n rcators or ro ema is y c
® 2 cm Muck (Al 0) (MLRA 147)
❑ Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
(MLRA 147, 148)
❑ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
(MLRA 136, 147)
❑ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)�
❑ Other (Explain in Remarks)
'Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
wetland hydrology must be,present,
unless disturbed or problematic
Hydric Soil Present? Yes ❑ Nom❑
=.
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2 0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
Project/Site Barrier Road 100 kV Tap Tranmission Line City /County Rockwell/Rowan Sampling Date - 2/26/2014_
Applicant/Owner Duke Energy _ State NC Sampling Point dp5
Investigator(s) .Eno Mularski $ Matt McKinney, _ Section, Township, Range —
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc) - depression- _� _ Local relief (concave, convex, none) -, Concave ,Slope ( %) <1
Subregion (LRR or MLRA) LRRP Lat}35 505 '" Long -80 512' _ _- _ - , Datum - __ __
Sod Map Umt Name ChA - Ctievvacla loam- "O to 2% slopes,=fi gd66tl' flooded _ Nwl classification none
Are climatic /,ltydroto is conditions on the site,typic Ufor,lhis,time of year? Yes=!,No , (i(no, explain in Remarks)
Are Vegetation Sod �, or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes 0 No
Are Vegetation Sod or Hydrology =naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes' ✓ 1 No� Is the Sampled Area
Hydnc Sod Present? Yesl 7 ✓- ' � No_t_J m6thm a Wetland? Yes No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes' = No'^
Remarks
Linear forested wetland (w3) located in the'floodplain of Dutch Buffalo Creek (s3)
HYDROLOGY
-Wetland Hydrology Indicators
Secondary Indicator- 54minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required cfidck all that apply)
❑ Surface Sod Cracks (B6)
❑✓ Surface Water (Al),
_ r
❑ True Aquatic Plants (B14)
❑ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (BB)
, ❑d, ,iHigh Water Table (A2)
❑ Hydrogen Sulfide Oddr-(C1)
❑ Drainage Patterns (B10)
Q Saturation (A3)
❑ Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
❑ Moss Trim Lines (B76)
❑ Water Marks (B1)
QiPresence of Reduced Ir6n „(C4)
❑ Dry- Season Water Table (C2)
❑ Sediment Deposits (B2)
❑ Recent Iron Reduction inFTdled'Sods (C6)
❑ Crayfish'Burrows (C8)
❑ Drift Deposits (B3)
❑ Thin Muck Surface (C7)
❑ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
❑ Algal Mal or Crust (134)
❑ Other (Explain in Remarks)
❑ Stunted or Stressed Plants (151)
❑ Iron Deposits (B5)
❑ Geomorphic Position (D2)
❑ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7)
❑ Shallow Aguitard (D3)
Water - Stained Leaves (B9)
❑ Micro - topographic Relief (D4)
❑Aquatic Fauna (B13)
❑ FAC- eutral Test (D5)
Field Observations-`
Surface Water Present? Yes E=
No Q Depth (inches) 1 -12
Water Table_ Present? Yes 0
No = Depth (inches) 0
0
II n
Saturation Present? Yes Q
No = Depth (inches)
Wetland
Hydrology Presents Yes No
includes capillary fringe)-
Describe-,Recorded Data (stream.gauge ,-monitoring -well; aerial photos, previous inspections), if available
Remarks
Primary wetland hydrology Indicators are present.
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2 0

VEGETATION (Five Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
,Tree Stratum (Plot size )
Cover Species? Status
Platanus,occidentahs_
_ 20
Yes
FACW
2. Acer rubrum._ _
_ 20 _
Yes
FAC_ _
3. Betula nigra= - _
_ __ _20
__ .-Yes--
FACW
aSLiquidamba�styractflua— -` -
-- ``20
Yes
`FAC`
5 - -- - -- -• -- -
_ -- - - - - ---
50% of total cover 40
Sapling Stratum (Plot size 15-ft )
J, Liquidambar, "styracill6w
=Total Cover -- —
20% of total cover 16
20 Yes FAC
2 Acer rubhum _ _ _ _ _ _
__10 Yes_ _ _ FAC
3 Juniperus ytrginiana_
5 _ _ No -- - _ ,FACU
4. Liriodendron,tulipifera-
5 -No FACU
FACU species
x 4 =
UPL species
x 5 =
50% of total cover 20
Shrub Stratum (Plot size J5 -ft -_ _ )
1•
40 = Total Cover
20% of total cover ,8
3,
5 - -- - -- -• -- -
_ -- - - - - ---
50% of total cover
Herb Stratum (Plot size, 5-ft -
j; Allium a scalonicum
- -- - ,= Total Cover
20% of total cover
5 Yes NI
3
4
Samphnq Point dp5- - - —
Numbef of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC 7 _ (A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata -7 (B)
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC 100 V (A /B)
Total %Cover_of
_ Multiply by
OBL species
x 1 =
FACW species _
x•2 = _
FAC species -- -
- x 3
FACU species
x 4 =
UPL species
x 5 =
Column Totals __ _
(A) (B)
rICVQIC116C minx = DIM
tiyaropnytic ,vegetauomtnaicators -
❑ 1 Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
❑ 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
i ❑ 3,- Prevalence Index is 53 0'
4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Ej Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
'Indicators of hydric sod and wetland hydrology must
be present; unless disturbed or problematic,
Tree - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 ft (6,m) or more in height and 3,in
(7 6 cm) orrlarger in diameter at breast height (DBH)
Sapling - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 It (6 m) or more in height and less
than 3 in (7 6 cm) DBH
Shrub - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 3 to 20 It (1 to 6 m) in height
7 - - - - - - - Herb - All herbaceous (non-woody). plants, including
herbaceous vines, regardless of size, and -woody
- - - - -- - - - - -- - -'i plants, except woody vines, less than approximately 3
9• ft (1 m) in height
10
11 . _
Woody vine - All woody vines, regardless of height
- - 5 - - - = -_ = Total Cover -- i— -
50% of total cover, 2 5 _ 20% of total cover 1- -
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size 30 -ft )
i', Lonicera japonica 2 Yes FAC
3
-
- - - 2 Hydrophylic
= Total Cover Vegetation
50 % of total cover 1 20 % of total cover 0 4
Present? Yes n No=
Remarks (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet) - - - -
Hydrophytic vegetation is dominant
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2 0

SOIL Sampling Point dp5
`Profits Description• - (Describe to the depth needed to document'the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators)
Depth Matrix
RedQ�t Features
(inches) Color (moist) %_
Color (moist) Type Loc'
Texture Remarks
0f4 10YR 512 95
10YR 5/6 5 C M
clay loam
4 -22 10YR 5/2 70
5YR 518 30- ,C_ - -. M _ _
_clay loam
'•T C= Concentration; l
D =De letion, f2! -ReducerNatrix`stMS= Masked Sand Grains; V
?Location PL =Pore brim ,- M =Matrix
Hydric Soil Indicators
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Sods': I
0 Histosol (Al)
❑ Dark Surface (S7)
B 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
❑ Histic Epipedon (A2)
D Polyvalue Below Surface (SB),(MLRA 147, 148) ❑ Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
❑ Black Histic (A3)
❑ Thin Dark Surface,(S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
(MLRA 147, 148)
❑ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
❑ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
Piedmont Floodplain Sods (1719)
❑ Stratified Layers (A5)
❑✓ Depleted Matrix (F3)
(MLRA 136, 147)
❑ 2 -cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
❑ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
[] Depleted Below Dark'Surface (Al 1)
❑ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
❑ Other (Explain in Remarks)
[] Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
❑ Redox Depressions (F8)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N,
❑ Iron- Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 147, 148)
MLRA 136)
❑ Sandy'Gleyed Matrix (S4)
❑ Umbric Surface (1713) (MLRA 136, 122)
'Indicators of hydrophy[ic vegetation and
❑ Sandy Redox (S5)
® Piedmont Floodplain Sods (F19) (MLRA 148) wetland hydrology must be present,
„ ❑, Stripped Matrix (S6)
❑Red Parent Material (F21) (ML'RA ,,127, 147) unless disturbed or problematic
- —
Restrictive Layer (if observed)
Type _
Hydric Sod Present? Yes ✓� No ❑
Depth (inches) -
Remarks
Hydric soil Indicators are present.
I
I
ll
a
i
US Army'Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2 0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM – Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
Project/site Barrier Road 100 kV Tap Tranmisslon Line City /County .Rockwell /Rowan __ _ Sampling Date 2/26/2014
Applicant/Owner Duke Energy — _ __ State NC Sampling Point dp6
Investigators) Enc Mularski & Matt McKinney Section, Township „Range
Landform (hilislope, terrace, etc y, hi[Islope Local relief (concave, convex, none) convex Slope
Subregion (LRR or MLRA)• LRRP Gat -35 505 - _ _- Long 80,512_
Sod Map Unit Name ChA = Chewacla' loam, 0 to 2% slopes, kequently'flooded > NWI classification , none
Are climatic / h rob c conditions on the site, Cypical'foi,this,lirrwof year? Yes i ,v i No' (If no, explain in Remarks )
Are Vegetation Sod =, or Hydrology, significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances” present Yes M No
Are Vegetation - Soil =, or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS – Attach site map showing
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present Yes I �No
Hydric Sod Present? Yes
Wetland Hydrology Present Yes No
'Upland data point for linear forested wetland (w3)
HYDROLOGY
�hng point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Is the Sampled Area
within a Wetland? Yes 0 No 0
Wetland Hydrology Indicators: - —
Secondarydridicators (minimum of two required)
,Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required check all that apply)- - - - --
❑ surface Sod Cracks (66)
❑ S_urface Water (A1) ❑True Aquatic Plants (814)
❑ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8)
❑ High Water Table (A2) ❑ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
❑Drainage Patterns (B10)
❑ Saturation (A3) ❑ Oxidized Rbzospheres on Living Roots (C3)
❑ Moss Trim Lines (B16)
Water Marks=(B1) ,0 Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
❑ Dry- Season Water Table (C2)
❑ Sediment Deposits,(62) ❑, Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Sods (C6)
❑ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
❑ ,Drift,DeposiW(B3) ❑ Thin Muck Surface (C7)
❑ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9),
❑ Algal Mat or Crust (B4) ❑ Other (Explain in Remarks)
❑ Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
❑ Iron Deposits (65)
❑ Geomorphic Position (02)
D Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7)
❑ Shallow Aquitard (133)
❑Water- Stained Leaves (69)
❑,Microtopographic Relief (D4)
,❑Aquatic Fauna (1313)
❑ FAC- Neutral TesUD5)
Field Observations
--
Surface,Wateir Present Yes ❑ No Q Depth (inches)
Water Table Present Yes Q No Q Depth (inches)
�
Saturation Present Yes= No= Depth (inches)
Wetland
Hydrology Present Yes i i.' No
includes capillary fringe)
-
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available
Remarks
No primary or secondary wetland hydrology Indicators are present
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2 0

VEGETATION (Five Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point, aPb
-u 30::ft
Absolute Dominant Indicator
' Dominance Test worksheet -
Tree Strat (Plot size _ . J
% Cover Species?
Status =
Number of Dominant Species
1. Betula -nigra _
20 Yes
FACW,
That Are OBL, FACW, or -FAC 5 (A)
2 ,bquidarribar styraciflua
40 Yes
FAC
3 - - - -- - - - - - -
3 Acei ,rubrum_ -- - - --
10 Yes
-FAC _ o
Total Number,of Dominant
Species Across All Strata _6 _ , -.. (g)
B.
Percent of Dominant Species
'-10 -- -. Total Cover------ -
20% of total cover 2
5_ Yes ,NI r
2. -Carex sp. _
5. _- _ _ __ - -- _ -- ^
_ -- _ _ -
_
I hat'Are UFiL, hACW, or FAC. E33 _ -- - (A/d)
6
70 _ = Total Cover
50% of total cover 35
Mina Stratum (Plot size_- -15 -ft I
1 Carpinus.carolinian-_ ______ __
20`Yo of total cover, 14
5 - -_ __ Yes __ FAC-
2.
- -- x 1 = -_-
-
x 2 =
- - -
- - - -
FACU species _
_ x 4 =
UPL species _-
_ x 5 =, --
50% of total cover 2 5
Shrub Stratum (Plot size _15-ft - )
1 Ligustrum smense _
5 = Total Cover
20% of total cover 1 1
10 Yes FACU
2_ -
- -
3 - - - -- - - - - - -
- — - - -- - -
5
B.
- ---�- -- -- - - -- - - -- - ---- -_ - -.
50% of total-cover 5
Herb Stratum (Plot size _ 5 -ft - )
1, Allwm,ascalonicum
'-10 -- -. Total Cover------ -
20% of total cover 2
5_ Yes ,NI r
2. -Carex sp. _
5 Yes _ _ : N1- _
r_ Total %'Cover of
- Multiply by
OBL species n - - - --
- -- x 1 = -_-
FACW species
x 2 =
FAC-species
x 3 = - ~T
FACU species _
_ x 4 =
UPL species _-
_ x 5 =, --
Column Totals
(A) (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A =
❑ -1 - Rapid Test-for Hydrophytic Vegetation
1:12 - Dominance Test is >50%
❑ 3 - Prevalence Index,is s3 0'
❑ 4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
data in Remarks of on a separate sheet)
❑ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
'Indicators of hydnc sod and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic
Tree - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height -and 3 in
(7 6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH)
Sapling - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 it (6 m) or more in height and less
than 3'in (7 6 cm) DBH
Shrub -Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
n-
_ - approximately 3 to 20, ft (1 to 6 m) in height
7. �- - - -- -- - - -
„9
10 = Total Cover
50% of total cover 5 20% of total cover 2
Woody vine Stratum (Plot size 30_ft-
11onicera-)aponica 5 Yes -_ _ FAC---
Herb - All herbaceous (non- woody) plants, including
herbaceous vines, regardless -of size, and woody
plants, except woody vines, less than approximately 3
m)
ft 0 in height
Woody vine - All woody vines, regardless of height
W,
5
Hydrophytic
- - - - - - 5 = Total Cover Vegetation (�
50 °,6 of total cover 2 5 20% of total cover 1 _
Present? Yes t . i No=
Remarks '(Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet) -
Hydrophytic vegetation is dominant
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Versiom2 0

SOIL
needed to
Sampling Point dp6
of indicators )
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) -% Tvoe c' Texture Remarks
0 -22 10YR 4/8 100 clay loam
'Type C= Concentration, D =De letion, RM= Reduced Matrix, MS= Masked Sand Grams 'Location PL =Pore Lining, M =Matrix
Hydnc Soil Indicators'
Indicators'for Problematic Hydric Sods
0 Histosol (At)
❑ Dark Surface (S7)
❑ 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
❑ Histic Epipedon (A2)
❑ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
❑ Coast Praine,Redox (A16)
❑ Black Histic 03)
❑ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
(MLRA 147, 148)
❑ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
❑ Loamy Gleyed Matnx'(F2)
0 Piedmont Floodplam Sods (F19)
Stratified Layers (A5)
n Depleted Matrix (F3)
(MLRA 136, 147)
❑ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
D Redox Dark Surface (176)
❑ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
❑ Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
❑ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
❑ Other (Explain in Remarks)
❑ Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
Redox Depressions (F8)
D Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N,
❑ Iron - Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 147, 148)
MLRA 136)
❑ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
❑ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122)
'Indicators of hydrophyfic vegetation and
' ❑ Sandy Redox (S5)
❑ Piedmont Floodplam Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
wetland hydrology must be present,
V❑ Stripped;Matrix (S6)-
Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147)_
unless disturbed or problematic
Type
Depth (inches), Hydric Soil Present? Yes ❑ No ❑
Remarks
No hydric soil indicators are present
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2 0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
Project site Barrier Road 100 kV Tap Tranmission Line City1county Rockwell /Rowan Sampling Date 2/26/2014
Applicant/owner Duke Energy -State NC Sampling Point dpi
ilnvestigator(s) Eric Mularski & Matt McKinney Section, Township, Range - -- - - -
-_ %
I Landform (hdlslope, terrace, etc ), depression _ _ _ - Locatrehef (concave, convex, none) ,concave Slope
- _ _ p e ( J 1
1 Subregion (LRR orMLRA) LRRP Lat 35 504 Long. -$0.511 Datum ! —
SoiliMap,Unit Name ChA - Chewacla loarn, 0 to 2% slopes frequently flooded - NWI classification none
j Are climatic / h drol - ic- conditions on the site typical for this time of,year7 Yes v 1 No (If no, explain in Remarks )
Are Vegetation, i - Sod or Hydrology,= significantly disturbed?-
isturbed Are 'Normal Circumstances" present? Yes 0 No
f Are Vegetation Soil Q or Hydrology '= naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks )
SUMMARY OF FINUINGS - Attacn site map snowing sampling point locations, transects, Important Features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present) Yes 0 No Is the Sampled Area
Hydnc Sod Present? Yes'[- No ✓ within a Wetland? Yes 0 No ❑✓
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No,
Remarks
'Data point for depressional drainage
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required check_ all that apply) _
❑ Surface Sod Cracks (B6)
❑ Surface Water (Al) ❑ True Aquatic Plants (1314)
❑ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
❑,High Water Table (A2) ❑ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
Q Drainage Patterns (810)
❑'Saturation (A3) ❑ Oxidized Rhizospheres on Uving,Roots (C3)
[] Moss Trim Lines (616)
❑ Water Marks (B1) ;❑ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
❑ Dry- season, water Table (C2)
❑ Sediment Deposits (62) ❑ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Sods (C6)
❑ Crayfish + Burrows (CB) ?
❑ Drift Deposits'(B3) ❑ Thin Muck Surface (C7)
❑ Saturation Visible on Aerial'Imagery (C9)
❑ Alga l,mat or Crust (134) ❑ Other (Explain in Remarks)
❑ Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
❑ Irombeposds (B5)
❑ Geomorphic Position (D2)
❑ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7)
❑ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
❑ Water - Stained Leaves (139)
❑ Microtopographic Relief (D4)
OAquatic'Fauna (1313)
❑ FAC- Neutral Test (D5)
Field observations-
Surface Water Present? Yes= No Q Depth (inches)
Water Table ,Present? Yes Q No Q Depth (inches)
n
Saturation Present? Yes Q No= Depth (inches)
Wetland
Hydrology Present? Yes No
includes ca dla fringe)-
-
y
-Descnbe`Recorded Data (stream`gauge, monitoring "well, aenal,photos previous inspections), if available
Remarks
tOne secondary wetland hydrology Indicator is present
i
i
i {
I
a
US Army,Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2 0

VEGETATION (Five Strata) - Use scientific names of plants. — Sampling Point opf
6 - - Prevalence Index = B_ /A =__ _
= Total Cover Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators-
50% of total cover - 20% of total cover _ _ _ ❑ 1 . Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
Shrub Stratum (Plot size 15 -ft ) ❑ 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
1f, Rosa multiflora 5 Yes FACU ❑ 3 - Prevalence Index is s3 0'
2 _ ❑ 4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate,sheet)
® Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetdtion' (Expldin)
5.
Absolute Dominant Indicator
Dominance TestworksFieet
-
50% of total cover 25
Herb Stratum (Plot size - 5Jt- — )
,Allium ascalonicurn T --
Tree Stratum (Plot size 30 -ft )
-
% Cover S Q ies? Status
Number of Dominant Species
3 - - -
- - -
Acer rubrum
30 Yes FAC
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata
-3 _ _
4
(A)
(B)
2, Llgdidambar styraciflua_ 10 Yes FAC
3 - - - - t - - - _ - -_- - -, - -- - _ -
4
Percent of Domindnl Speces
_
? -
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC
75
(A/B)
40- = Total Cover
Prevalence Index worksheet
50% of total cover ,20
- 20 %° of total cover $
_._ Total °6 Cover -of' - `Muluoly by
15 -ft ;)
_
OBL species
x 1 =
-
Spa lino Stratum (Plot size
- - -
FACW species
x2=-
FAC species
x 3 =.
2.
FACU species
x 4 =.
_
-t
UPL species
x 5 =
4.-
Co_ lumn Totals
(A) v
(B)
- - -- -- - --
5
6 - - Prevalence Index = B_ /A =__ _
= Total Cover Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators-
50% of total cover - 20% of total cover _ _ _ ❑ 1 . Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
Shrub Stratum (Plot size 15 -ft ) ❑ 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
1f, Rosa multiflora 5 Yes FACU ❑ 3 - Prevalence Index is s3 0'
2 _ ❑ 4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate,sheet)
® Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetdtion' (Expldin)
5.
6 - -- -
-
50% of total cover 25
Herb Stratum (Plot size - 5Jt- — )
,Allium ascalonicurn T --
5 = Total Cover
20% of total cover 1
10 Yes NI
3 - - -
- - -
7,
50% of total cover 5 _
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size 30-ft )
i; Lonlcera japonica
10_. Total Covcr
= 20% of total cover 2
5 Yes FAC
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
hP prPePnt, unlesa,disli irhPd nr prnhlPmatir
Tree - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in'heighl and 3 in
(7 6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH)
sapling - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 ft,(6 rn)�or more'in height antl less
than 3 in (7 6 cm) DBH
Shrub - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 3 to 20 it (1 to 6 m) in height
Herb-. All herbaceous (non- woody) plants, including
herbaceous vines, regardless of size; and woody
plants, except woody vines, less than approximately 3
R (1 m) in height
Woody vine - All woody vines, regardless of height -
3 =—
4.
,5 - - - - -- — - -- _- - - - - -- - - - - - - -- - - - Hydrophytic
5 = Total Cover Vegetation
50% of total cover 2 5 20% of total cover 1 Present? Yes E71 No=
Remarks: (Include photo, numbers here or on a separate'sheet )
Hydrophytic vegetation is dominant
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2 0

SOIL
to the
or
of
Sampling Point dp7
Depth; Matrix Redox Features
(inch sal _ Color (moist) % Color (moist) = ` % Tvoe Loc Texture Remarks
0;22 10YR 5/8 100 clay loam
3e 6Concentralion „D ='Oe �etion, RM= Reduced Mahix,-MS= Masked Sand'Grains` 'Location PL =Pore Llnin , M =Matrix
Hydric Sod Indicators:
Indicators for Problematic Hydnc Soils'•
❑ Histosol (Al)
❑ Dark Surface (S7)
❑ 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
❑ Histic Epipedon (A2)
❑ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
❑ Coast Prairie Redox (Al 6)
❑ Black Hisbc (A3)
❑ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
(MLRA 147, 148)
❑ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
❑ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
❑ Piedmont Floodplam Sods (F79)
❑ Stratified Layers (AS)
n Depleted Matrix (F3)
(MLRA 136, 147)
❑ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
❑ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
❑ Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
'❑ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
❑ Other (Explain in Remarks)
❑ Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
,❑ Redox Depressions (F8)
❑asantly Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N,
❑ Iron - Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 147, 148)
MLRA 136)
® Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
❑ Umbnc Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122)
'Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
❑ Sandy Redox (S5)
❑ Piedmont Floodplam Sods (F19) (MLRA 148)
wetland hydrology must be present,
❑_Stripped Matrix (S6)
❑Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147)
unless,disturbed or,problemahc
Type - -
Depth (inches)
Remarks -
No hydric soil indicators are present
Hydnc Soil Present*7 Yes No
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version'2 0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
Project/Site Barner Road 100 kV Tap Tranmission Line city /County _Rockwell /Cabarrus Sampling Date 2/26/2014
Applicant/Owner _,Duke Energy_ _ _ _ __ ___ __ State NC Sampling Point dp8
Invesugator(s) EhC Mularskl''& Matt McKinney Section, Township, Range _ - -_- -
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc y ddpfessiorl Local relief (concave, convex, none) concave `T Slope
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): -LRRP _ _ , Lat 35 502_ _ Long -80 510 Datum
Sou Map Unit Name . ChA -,C hewacla loam, 0 to 2% slopes, frequently flooded NWI classification none
Are climatic I h drolo is conditions on the site typical for,this,time,of year? Yes = No (if no, explain in Remarks )
Are Vegetation Soil(❑ or Hydrology= significantly disturbed? Are "Normal�Circumslances" present? Yes 0✓ No ❑
Are Vegetation soda ❑! or Hydrology =naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS , .Attach site map showing sam
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present?
Yes L,!-- J' No
�
Hydnc Sod Present? Yes I �
'No,
'Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes M No
point locations, transacts, Important reatures, etc.
Is the Sampled Area
within a Wetland? Yes = No _
-Forested wetland (w4) located in the floodplaln of Dutch Buffalo Creek (s3)
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators: - ` "-
' Secontlary Intlicalors,(rriinimum of two reauired)
Primary , Indicators (minimum of one is required check'all thaNipolv) - - -
D Surface Sod Cracks (66)
❑ Surface Water,(A7) ❑ True Aquatic Plants (814)
❑ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (68)
Q High Water Table (A2) ❑ Hydrogen Sulfide-Odor (C1)
❑ Drainage Patterns (810)
[Z] Saturation (A3) ❑ Oxidized Rhaospheres on Living Roots (C3)
Q Moss Trim Lines (1316)
❑ Water Marks (131) ❑ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
❑ Dry- Season Water Table (C2)
❑ Sediment Deposits (132) ❑ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Sods (C6)
❑ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
❑ Drift °Deposits (133) ❑ Thin Muck Surface (C7)
❑ Saturation Visible,on Aerial Imagery,(C9)
e❑ Algal Mat or Crust,(134) ❑ Other (Explain in Remarks)
❑ Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
�] Iron Deposits,(65)
_],Geomorphic Position (D2)
❑ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
❑ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
D Water - Stained Leaves (69)
❑ Microtopographic Relief (D4)
❑Aquatic Fauna (B13)
❑ FAC- Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations — - --
Surface Water Present? Yes I� No Q Depth (inches)
Water Table Present? Yes= No Q Depth (inches) 6
4
II
Saturation Present? Yes= No= Depth (inches)
Wetland Hydrology
Present? Yes No
includes ca ills 4rm
Describe Recorded Data (stream,gauge, monitoring well, - aerial photos, previous inspechohs), if available
-
r Remarks
Primary and secondary wetland hydrology indicators are present
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2 0

VEGETATION (Five Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point dp8
- - - --
30 -'ft
-- Absolute
Dominant Indicator
Dominance Test worksheet -- -
Tree Stratum (Plot size _ _)
% Cover �-pecies? Status
of Dominant Species
1 Llquldambar_st raciflua=
Y _ _
_ 30
Yes . FAC
that Ar
that Are OBL, FACW, or FAC a5 -- -_ -_— (A)
2 Acer rubrum -
20
Yes- z -FAC - '
-
3. Plataus'occidentalis
_ -
20
Yes ~FACW
_ _
Total Number of Dominant
Speue!, Aciuss All Strata -6 - -.--_ -__ (B)
4.
4. - — - - —
--- - - - --
5 -
- -
6
Percent of Dominant Species
=Total Cover - -
20% of total cover 25
--
10 Yes NI____
2
-
That 'Are OBL, FACW, -or FAC 83 (A/B)
6 • -
-
50% of total cover 35
.Sapling Stratum (Plot size 15 -ft
1 Platanus occidentalis _ _ _
-70 -- - = Total Cove_ r — --
20% of total cover_ 14
.20- - ._ Yes_ _ FACW
2. Liquidambar- styraciflua _ _
20 Yes FAC
,3,Acer rubirum - — - - -
5 No `FAC —
FACIspecies
x 3 = —' —_
«5t
x 4 = _
UPL species
-- --
- - - - - - -- - -- - - - -- - -- - --- ---
50% of total cover 20
Shrub Stratum (Plot size 15 -ft )
1 Rosa mulbflora
40 -- -- To-'tai Cover
20% of total cover 8
5 Yes FA_CU
,2 Rubus sp.
5�
4. - — - - —
--- - - - --
5 -
- -
6
50% of total cover 5
Herb Stratum (Plot size 5 -ft )
1 Allium,ascalonicum
=Total Cover - -
20% of total cover 25
--
10 Yes NI____
2
-
3 ^- --- _ - -- - -
4.
7.
10.
• _ -- - - - - -- - - - - -- - - 10 =Total Cover --
50°/6 of total cover 5 20% of total cover 2
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot,size 30 -4 )
1
2. - -
4, - — -
5
Prevalence Index worksheet
-
Total % Cover of
Multiply by
OBL species
x 1 =
FACW species
x 2 = _
FACIspecies
x 3 = —' —_
FACU species
x 4 = _
UPL species
x 5 =
Column Totals •- - --
(A) (B)
'Prevalence Index = B/A = -
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators-
El 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
Q 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
3 - Prevalence Index is s3 0'
Q 4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Problematic - Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydroloqy must
be present, unless disturbed or probicmobc
Trpw - Wnndy,plTnts, Pxrluding woody vines,
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and 3 in
(7 6 cmpor larger in diameter at breast heigfJt (DBH)
Sapling - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less
than 3 in (7 6 cm) DBH
Shrub - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) in height
Herb - All herbaceous (non- woody) plants, including
herbaceous vines, regardless of size, and woody
plants, except woody vines, less than approximately 3
ft (1 m) in height
Woody vine - All woody vines, regardless of height
Hydrophytic
= Total Cover Vegetation
50% of total cover , 20% of total cover Present?
- Remarks `(Include photo numbers here o� on a separate sheet 1 - - -� -
Hydrophytic vegetation is dominant.
Yes ✓n No=
US Army Corps of Engineers ,Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2 0

SOIL _Sampling Point dp8
,'Profile,Descnpbon� (Describe to the depth needed to documenitthe indicator or confiim the absence of indicators) - - - - - -
Depth Matrix -__ -
_ Redox Features
(inches) -- Color (moist)__ - __/° - -_
_ _Color (moist) - % Tvoe Loc Texture Remarks -
0 -22 _ 1'OYR 5/2 60
7 5YR 5/8 40 C M clay loam
it
t
'Type -C= Concentration, D = Depletion_ RM= Reduced Matrix MS= Masked Sand - Grains . 2Location PL=-Pore Lining, M =Matrix
H dric'Soll Indicators
Indicators foi Problematic Hydric Sods':
� (Al)
❑ Dark Surface (S7)
❑ 2 cm Muck (Al 0) (MLRA 147)
_Histosol
+ ❑ Histic Epipedon (A2)
❑ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
❑ Coast Prairie Redox (All 6)
i ❑ ,Black Hisbc (A3)
❑ Thin Dark Surface'(59) (MLRA 147, 148)
(MLRA 147, 148)
❑ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
❑ Loamy Gleyed'Matrix (F2)
��11
E Piedmont, Floodplain Sods (F19)
❑ Stratified Layers (A5)
n Depleted Matrix (F3)
(MLRA 136, 147)
❑ 2 cm,Muck (A10) (LRR N)
❑, Redox Dark Surface (F6)
t--1
lj Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
❑ Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
❑ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
❑ Other (Explain in Remarks)
❑ Thick Dark Surface (Al 2)
❑ Redox Depressions (F8)
❑ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N,
❑ Iron' Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 147, 148)
MLRA,136)
❑ Sandy Gleyed'Matrix (S4)
❑ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122)
3Indicators of hydrophylic vegetation and
❑ Sandy Redox (S5)
❑ Piedmont Floodplam Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
wetlana hydrology must be present,
Stripped Matrix ($6)_ _
__❑ -Red Parent Material (F21)_(MLRA_127, 147) -
unless disturbed or problematic _
_
f
Restrictive gayer (if observed)
Type
❑�
{
Depth (inches) - - - - -- - -
�= - - -- - --
-Remarks
-- - - -- --
Hydric
Sod Present? Yes Noll ,
- - -- - -
_
) '-
Hydnc soil Indicators are present _
I
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2 0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
Projectisite Barrier Road 100 kV Tap Tranmission Line City /County Rockwell /Cabarrus Sampling Date 2/26/2014_
ApplicantlOwner Duke Energy _ State `NC Sampling Point dp9
Investigator(sy.Enc MUlarskl & Matt,MCKinney_ _ _ _ Section, Township, Range
Landform (hdlslope, terrace, etc) - depression Local relief (concave, convex, none)_ Concave,___ _ Slope ( %) <1
Subregion (LRR or ML'RA) LRRP fiat, 35 502 Long - 80.510 _ _ Datum
SOWMap Unit Name ChA - Chewacla loam; 0 to 2 %slopes,,fre i ently'flooded NWI classification none
Are clinnatic4ftdrologic conditions-on the site'typic(_al'f�or�this time of year? Yes v l No (If no, explain in Remarks)
Are Vegetation - — Sod 0. or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes 0 No
Are Vegetabon 'Soil Q° or Hydrology 11—�f naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes0 No - Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes, No within a Wetland? Yes 0 No r (7 '._
Wetland Hydrology Presents Yes No
Remarks
Upland data point for forested wetland (w4)
HYDROLOGY
Wetland,Hydrology Indicators
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minim_ u_m of one is required, check•all that Prima" Indicators of one required that apo�l
❑ Surface Sod Cracks (136)
❑ Surface,Water (Al) ❑ True Aquatic Plants (1314)
❑ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8)
❑ High Water Table (A2) ❑ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
❑ Drainage Patterns (610)
O'Saturation (A3) ❑ Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (0)
❑✓ Mass Trim Lines (616)
'Water Marks (131) Q Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
❑ Dry- Season Water Table (C2)
❑ Sediment Deposits (132) ❑ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Sods (C6)
❑ Crayfish. Burrows (C8)
Q Drift Deposits,(63) ❑ Thin Muck Surface (C7)
❑ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
{
❑ Algal, Mat or Crust (134) ❑ Other (Explain in Remarks)
❑ Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1) t
❑ Iron Deposits,(B5)
❑ Geomorphic Position (132)
j] Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
❑ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
❑ Water- Stained Leaves (139)
❑ Microtopographic Relief (D4)
D Aquatic Fauna (613)
❑ FAC- Neutral Test (D5)
Field,0bservations
T
Surface Water Present? Yes = No 0 Depth (inches)
Water Table Present? Yes = Noy= Depth (inches)
n
Saturation Present? Yes = No Q Depth (inches)
Wetland
Hydrology Present? Yes No
includes capillary fringe),
- -
Mescribe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections): if available -
Remarks
,No primary and secondary wetland hydrology indicators are present.
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2 0

vEGE t A t IUN (Five strata) — use scientitic names of plants. sampling Point, oP J - -
30 -ft
Absolute Dominant, Indicator
Dominance Test worksheet -
Tree Stratum (Plot size )
Cover S cpe ies? Status
Number of, Dominant Species
Liquidambar'styraciflua _ _
30 Yes FAC
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC 5 (A)
Total esAcro o6Do Strata
Species Across All Strata 6
- -
2,Acer eubrum- 20 Yes FAC
3, P__latanus_occidentalls___..> - _____ -- _.. 20 Yes FACW
_ �
4.
Percent of Dominant Species
- - - - - - - -
5
That Are OBL, FACW, or f At: 83 (A /D)
70 = Total Cover
Prevalence Index worksheet
50% of total cover .35
20% of total cover 14
- Total °. Coverof _ _ `Multiply by
Sapling Stratum (Plot size' 15 -ft t
OBL species x 1 =
11, Liquidarnbar styraciflua
20 Yes FAC
FACW species -' x 2 =
FAC species x 3 =
FACU species x a = --
UPL species x 5 = -
2 ,Juntperus'vii=giniana _ _ _ ,10_ Yes _ FACU
3, Platanus occidentalls_ _ _5 _ -No. FACW
a'
Column Totals (A) — - (B)
- - - -. -- - -- -- - _ —_ - - - - -- - -
Prevalence Index_= B/A =
5
35 _ = Total Cover
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators
50% of total cover 17.5
20% of total cover 7
❑ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
Shrub Stratum (Plot size 75 -ft _ _ _ _ _ _
❑ 2 - Dominance Test is >5o%
1 Rubus sp
20 Yes NI
❑ 3 - Prevalence Index is 53 0'
❑ 4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
® Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Expidin)
2.
3
4 =
Indicators of hydnc sod and wetland hydrology must
- - — — -
6'
ha prPSPnt, unlPecdishirhPd nr firnhipmatir
20 = Total Cover
-
Definitions -of Five Vegetation Strata
50% of total cover 10
20% of total cover 4
5-ft
Tree -Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
Herb Stratum (Plot size - )
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and 3 in
1„ Microstegium vimineum
10 Yes FAC
(7 6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH)
Sapling - Woody plants; excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 ft (6 m) of more in height and less
than 3 in (7 6 cm) DBH
Shrub - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 3 to 20 it (1 to 6 m) in height
Herb - All herbaceous (non- woody) plants, including
herbaceous vines, 'regardless of size, and woody
plants, except woody vines, less than approximately 3
2 Allium ast;alonum ie 5 Yes NI
_ ,
3 _ _ _ _
4
s
6` - - -v -- - -- - -- - -- "- " -- - - `-
7 - -
- -
ft (1 m) in height
1U
Woody vine - All woody vines, regardless of height
11 -
15 = Total Cover
_ -- -- -- - y - - -
50% of total cover 7 5
20% of total cover
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size 3O-ft )
1.
3` -
4 - -
5.
Hydrophytic
- - - -
= Total Cover
Vegetation
Presents Yes n No=
50% of total cover
20% of total cover
Remarks (include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet)
Hydrophytic vegetation is dominant
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2 0

SOIL Sampling Point, dp9
'Profile Description: - (Describe to the depth needed to document the`indicator or confirm the absence of,indicators') " --
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) - % Tvoe Loc Texture Remarks
0 -22 10YR 5/8 100
-'.T, a ,C =_Concentration, D =De lesion, RM= Reduced Matnx „MS =Masked Sand Grains !Location•) PC'= Pofe�L[nin' . M =Matrix
Hydric Sod Indicators:
Indicators for Problematic Hydnc Sods'
Histosol (Al)
❑ Dark Surface (S7)
❑ 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
_❑
i❑ Histic Epipedon (A2)
❑ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
❑ Coast Prairie Redox,(A16)
❑ Black Histic (A3)
❑ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
(MLRA 147, 148)
❑ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
❑ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
❑ Stratified Layers (A5)
❑ Depleted Matnx (F3)
(MLRA 136, 147)
❑ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
❑ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
❑ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
❑ Depleted Below Dark - Surface (A11)
❑ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
L] Other (Explain in Remarks)
❑ Thick Dark,Surface (Al2)
❑ Redox Depressions (F8)
D Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N,
❑ Iron - Manganese Masses (F72) (LRR N,
MLRA 1,47, 148)
MLRA 136)
❑ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
❑ Umbnc Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
❑ Sandy Redox (S5)
❑ Piedmont Floodplam Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
wetland hydrology must be present,
❑` Stepped Matnzv(S6).- _=
n Red _Parent Material _(F21) (MLRA 127,'147)
unless disturbed or problematic
Restrictive Layer (if observed)--
-
1 Type
No
Depth (inches):, --
"Remarks
Hydnc Sod Present? Yes ,❑
-
i , No hydrlc soil indicators are present
t
it
l
i
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2 0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
Project/Site Barrier Road 100 kV Tap Tranmission Line city /County Rockwell /CabarruS _ Sampling Date 2/26/2014
Applicant/Owner Duke Energy _ _ _ _ State NC Sampling Point -1310
Invesugato`r(s) Eric Mularskll& Matt McKinney_ . _ Section, Township, Range
Landform (hilislope, terrace, etc.). depression Local relief (concave, convex, none).- concave - v Slope ( %) <1
Subregion (LRR or MLRA) LRRP Lat 35 501 Long -80 51'0 o Datum _
Sod Map Unit Name ChA - Chewacla loam, 0 to 2 %,slopes; =frequently,flooded _ NWI classification.,_none
Are climatic /-h drol `- ic'conditions on the site typical for,this time, of year? Yes v 'I No, — (If no, explain in Remarks)
Are Vegetation ISod ❑, or Hydrology significantly disturbed Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yesm✓ , No=
Are Vegetation Sod ❑ „or Hydrology � naturally problematic? (if needed, explain any answers in Remarks)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attacn Site map Snowing sampling Point locations, transacts, Important features, etc.
Hydrophyttc,Vegetation Present? Yes ��. No Is the Sampled Area
Hydnc Sod Present? Yes I v- =1 N& + i within a Weiland? Yes No 0
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes � No l
r forested wetland (w5) that drains directly Into Dutch Buffalo Creek (s3)
HYDROLOGY
i Wetland Hydrology Indicators.
-- -- - '- - - -- Secondary Indicators (minimum'of two required) '
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is reowred,'check all that apply)
❑ Surface Sod Cracks (86)
❑✓ Surface Water (Al)
❑ True Aquatic Plants (814)
❑ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
❑✓ High Water Table (A2)
❑ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
Drainage Patterns (1310)
❑✓ Saturation (A3)
❑ Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (0)
❑ Moss Trim Lines (B16)
❑ Water Marks (B1)
❑ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
❑ Dry- Season Water Table (C2)
❑ Sediment Deposits (62)
❑ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Sods (C6)
❑ Crayfish Burrows (Cal
❑ Drift Deposits (63)
❑ Thin Muck Surface (C7)
❑ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
❑ Algal,Mat,or Crust (64)
❑ Other (Explain in Remarks)
❑ Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
Iron Deposits (65)
❑ Geomorphic Position (62)
❑ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7)
❑ Shallow Aqudard (D3)
❑ Water - Stained Leaves (B9)
❑ Microtopographic Relief (D4)
_❑ Aquatic Fauna (613)
- - --
- - - -- - - - -
❑ FAC- Neutral Test (D5)
- - - - - -- - - - --
'Field Observations
l
Surface Water Present? Yes ✓�
No ❑ Depth onche§) 1-12
I
Water Table Present? Yes 0
No ® Depth (inches) 0
0
II j
Saturation Present? Yes Q
No= Depth (inches)
wetland
Hydrology Present? Yes No J�
includes,ca filar fringe)
-
Descnbe Recorded Data (stream - gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos; previous inspections) if available
Remarks
,Primary and secondary wetland hydrology indicators are present
f
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2 0

VEGILTATION (Five Strata) -0smscientific names myplants.
Tree�Stratum (Plot size 30-ft
Absolute Dominant Indicator
% Cover Species? Status
oaL species
x1~________'
rACw species
xxr_==~�_~_�
pAc'^p,mo,
xx'~
25 Total Cover
50% bf total cover, 12 5 20% of total cover 5
Sapling Stratu (Plot size 1 5-ft
x*�,____,___
opL,ps/e,
x5�______----
Column Totals =�-=�=.(»)
5o% or total cover 75
Shrub Stratum (Plot size 15-ft
15 - Total Cover
20% of total cover 3
mmm total cover
Herb Stratum (Plot size ��--
1 M
Total oo"o
20% of
1D FAC'
»
10 Yes ~�~ N| _.
a'
/
'n
-_--_--_---_''----_
Sampil/ng D
onmmanceremwnrksxuut�--'- -'--- -
Number of Dominant Species
That Are naL,pACW,mmo 6, (A)
I otal mumu*,m'ovnnnunt'
�� its Ac/'~�All SO ^* 7 (�
Percent mn
ro^t U
k. pAtw.inpAo' 88 (A/8)
Prevalence Index ~am~ - - --
1 - Rapid Test for Hydroohytic Vegetation
2 - Dominance Test is >50%
3 - Prevalence Index is 53 0'
4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
data in,Remarks or on a separate sheeti
Problematic, Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
'Indicators of hydr - ic soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic -
plahts, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20A (6 m) or more in height and 3 in
(7 6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast heigKf (DBH)
Sapling - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20x(6 m) ormore in height and less
than xm no cm) no*
Shrub plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately xmzonpmom>mheight
Herb - All herbaceous (non-woody) plants, including
herbaceous vines, regardless of size, and woody
plants, except woody vines, less than approximately x
ft (1 m) in height
10 Woody vine - All woody vines, regardless of height
50% of total cover 10 20% of total cover 4
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size 30-ft
1, Lonicera japonica __5 Yes FAC
5o% of total cover 2 5 5 - - Total Cover Vigetation
20% of total cover
Remarks—(Include photo-numbers here or-on a-separateFsheet)-
,Hydrophytic vegetation is dominant
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - vemonao
_Multiply by-
oaL species
x1~________'
rACw species
xxr_==~�_~_�
pAc'^p,mo,
xx'~
rxouspeoe,
x*�,____,___
opL,ps/e,
x5�______----
Column Totals =�-=�=.(»)
Prevalence Index ~am~ - - --
1 - Rapid Test for Hydroohytic Vegetation
2 - Dominance Test is >50%
3 - Prevalence Index is 53 0'
4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
data in,Remarks or on a separate sheeti
Problematic, Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
'Indicators of hydr - ic soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic -
plahts, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20A (6 m) or more in height and 3 in
(7 6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast heigKf (DBH)
Sapling - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20x(6 m) ormore in height and less
than xm no cm) no*
Shrub plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately xmzonpmom>mheight
Herb - All herbaceous (non-woody) plants, including
herbaceous vines, regardless of size, and woody
plants, except woody vines, less than approximately x
ft (1 m) in height
10 Woody vine - All woody vines, regardless of height
50% of total cover 10 20% of total cover 4
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size 30-ft
1, Lonicera japonica __5 Yes FAC
5o% of total cover 2 5 5 - - Total Cover Vigetation
20% of total cover
Remarks—(Include photo-numbers here or-on a-separateFsheet)-
,Hydrophytic vegetation is dominant
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - vemonao

SOIL Samp ing Point dp10
,Profile Description (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators)-
Depth Matrix
Redox Features-
(inches) Color (moist) -_ %
Color (moist) % Type~ -LOC
Texture Remarks . — -
0 -22 10YR 5/2 55
2 5YR 4/5 40 C PL
clay loam
10YR 2/1 5 C M
„7 e._C =Concentration, D =De letion„ RM =Reduced`Matrix : ;MS = Masked, Sand Grains _
ZLocation - PL =Pbre L'iriiri , M =Matrix -I
H dnc,Soil Indicators,
Indicators for Problematic Hydric,soils'
Histosol'(A1)
❑ Dark Surface (S7)
® 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
❑ Histic Epipedon (A2)
❑ Polyvalue Below Surface,(S8) (MLRA 147, 148) ❑ CoasLPrairie Redox (A16)
❑ Black Histic,(0
❑ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
(MLRA 147, 148)
❑ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
❑ Loamy,Gleyed Matrix (F2)
❑ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
❑ Stratified Layers (A5)
❑✓ Depleted Matrix (F3)
(MLRA 136, 147)
❑ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
❑ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
❑ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
❑ Depleted Below Dark,Surface (All 1)
D Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
❑ Other (Explain in Remarks)
❑ Thick Dark,Surface (All 2)
D Redox Depressions (F8)
❑ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N,
❑ Iron - Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 147, 148)
MLRA 136)
❑ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
❑ Umbric surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122)
'Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
❑ Sandy Redow(S5)
❑ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (r19) (MLRA 148) wetland hydrology must be present,
❑ Stripped Matrix (S6) _
❑ Red_Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127,_147)
__unless disturbed or problematic n
Restrictive "Layer (if observed)_-
I Type_ _
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No a
t Depth (inches)_: ~_ —
- -- - -- - - - - �-
- --
I "Remarks:;
Hydric soil indicators are present.
6,
_
l
,u
I
II
I
t
i
!
�
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2 0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATkFORM — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
` Project/Site Barrier Road 100 kV Tap Tranmisslon Line city /county Rockwell /Cabarrus Sampling Date 2/26/2014_
[ Applicant/Owner,_Duke Energy- _ State NC Sampling Point do-1
Investigator(s) Eric Mularski_ &Matt McKinney _ � Section, Township, Range .
( Landform (hdlslope, terrace, etc) hillslope _ _ Local relief (concave, convex, none) convex — _ _,`Slope ( %) <1
Subregion (LRR or MLRA); LRRP Lat 35 501- Long -80 510 _ _ Datum
f Soil Map'Umt Name ChA = Chewacla Ioam;,0 to 2% slo es;'f�e uently:flooded NWI classification none
Are climatic / hydrolo `ic conditions on the site,typic I for hi A e of year? Yes ,❑✓ � No . (If no, explain in Remarks)
- ! j�'�
Are Vegetation' -- > Soil;; or Hydrology �-lJ- significantly disturbed Are "Normal Circumstances' present? Yes No
Are Vegetation Soil' or Hydrology 1_1 naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks)
,UMMAKT VF FltYuiimuJ - AUdGrt SitB RIdP Snuwu19 adn 1P11r19 PUn It wt.autiria, Liana AILat n INU .1
H dro h Uc Vegetation Present? Yes.0 No
_ Is the Sampled Area ✓
Hydric Sod Present? Yes ❑ +No ✓ within a Wetland? Yes = No F
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes,= No
'Remarks-
Upland data point for linear forested wetland (w5)-
HYDROLOGY
'Wetland'Hydrology Indicators -- -"
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required) "
Primary-1 ndicato-rs (minimum of one is required check all that apply)
❑ Surface Soil Cracks (B6)
[] Surface water (Al) ❑ True Aquatic Plants (B14)
❑ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface�(B8)
❑ High Water Table (A2) ❑ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (07)
❑ Drainage Patterns (610)
❑'Saturation (A3) ❑ Oxidized Rhaospheres on Living Roots (C3)
❑ Moss Trim Lines (616)
,❑ Water Marks (B1) ❑ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
❑ Dry- Season Water Table (C2)
'❑ Sediment Deposits (62) ❑ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Sods (C6)
❑ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
T❑ Drift Depositsi(133) ❑ Thin Muck Surface (C7)
❑ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
,_❑' Algal Mat or Crust (64) ❑ Other (Explain in Remarks)
❑ Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
,❑ IromDeposits'(B5)
❑ Geomorphic Position (132)
❑Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
❑ Shallow Aquitard (133)
❑ Water - Stained Leaves (139)
❑ Microtopographic Relief (D4)
' o Aqualic Fauna (613)
E] FAC- Neutral Test (D5)
i Field Observations
i
Surface Water Present? Yes No= Deptti (inches)
Water Table Present? Yes ❑ No Q Depth (inches)
n
Saturation Present? Yes Q No �✓ Depth (inches)
Wetland Hydrology Present'7 Yes No�
t includes�ca illa fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, - monitoring well, aerial photos: previous inspections), if available
Remarks
1
,No,primary and secondary wetland hydrology Indicators are present
I
I
I
I
i
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2 0

vtwt i m i lum trive strata/ - use scientinc,names or plants. _ R i z�ampling Point up i i
30 -ft
'Absolute - Dominant - Indicator ',-Dominance
Test worksheet. -
-
Tree Stratum (Plot size )
° Cover Species? Status
Number of Dominant Species
Li uldambar sf raclflua
1 _ _9 Y
15 Yes FAC
That A're 013L, FACW; or FAC 6_ (A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata 7 (B)
,2 Acer rubrum_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ 10 Yes_- FAC _
Llnodendron_tuhpifera, _ _ 5: _ Yes _ FACU
_ _
4.
5- -
- -
Percent ofvominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC 86 (A!B)
-30 = Total Cover
Prevalence Index worksheet
50% of total cover 15
20% of total cover 6
Total % Cover of _ Mutt iply by,
-
Sapling Stratum (Plot size, 15 -ft )
pgL species x 1 =
— -
1 AC& rubrum
10 Yes FAC
f
FACW species _ _ __ x 2 =a
FAC species — — x 3
FACU species x 4 =
2 Llguidambar styraclflua ,5 Yes _ FAC
UPL species x 5 =
- - _- - - - - - - - - -
Column Totals _ (A) _ (B)
-
5
Prevalence Index = B/A
6 _ _ -_ _
15 - = Total Cover
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators -
50% of total cover 7 5
20% of total cover 3
❑ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
Shrub Stratum (Plot size 15 -ft
7.
❑ 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
_
❑
1
3 - Prevalence Index is 53 0'
❑ 4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
❑ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
Z _ _ _ -
3 - - _ - -_
f 4 -
5
'Indicators of hydnctsoil and wetland hydrology must
-- - - -
6
-
be present, unless disturbed or problematic
- - = Total Cover
Definitions -of Five Vegetation Strata.
50% of total cover
20% of total cover 4
'Herb Stratum Plot size
( 5 =ft —_ -)
Tree -Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and 3 in
Microstegium vimineum
10 Yes FAC
(7 6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH)
Sapling - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
,2.Alllum,ascaloiicum 10 Yes NI
3 _ ___
approximately 20 rt (6 m) or more in height and less
than 3 in (i6 cm) DBH
Shrub - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) in height
Herb ­All herbaceous (non- woody) plants, including
herbaceous vines, regardless of size, and woody
plants, except woody vines, less than approximately 3
6'
? - - - - - -
g __
- - - - - -- - - _ - - - - - - - - -
8
ft (1 m) in height
-- - - - -- - -- --
jn
Woody vine - All woody vines, regardless of height
- - -
20 _ = Total Cover
-
50% of total cover 10
20% of total cover 4
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size 30-ft )
j• Lonicera japonica —
5 Yes FAC
Hydrophytic
'3. -
4,
- - -- - -- - -
5
= Total Cover
Vegetation �
Present? Yes No=
50% of total cover 2 5
20% of total cover
i • i
Remarks (include photo numbers'here or on a separate sheet
)
Hydrophytic vegetation is dominant
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2 0

SOIL Sampling Point dp1 1
Profile Description (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator'or confirm the absence of indicators)
Depth, - - Matrix Redox Features -
finches) — Color (moist) % Color (moist) % iyReL_- Loc Texture Remarks
0-22 1 OYR 5/8 .­100 clay loam
,fypW &.6.ricentration. 6=beiiletion, RM=Reduced,Matrix,'MS-Masked,Sand Grains' 'Location PL=Pore brilng, M=Matnx
ric Soil, Indicators-
TilHistosoll
S3-
Indicators for Problematic Hydric SojI
(Al)
❑ Dark Surface (S7)
❑ 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
O Histic Lpipedon (A2)
❑ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
❑ Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
❑ Black Histic (A3)
❑ Thin Dark,Surface (S9) (MLRA 147,148)
(MLRA 147,148)
❑ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
❑ Loamy Gieyed matrix (F2)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
❑ Stratified Layers (A5)
❑ Depleted matrix (F3)
(MLRA 136,147)
❑ 2'cm Muck (Al 0) (LRR N)
❑ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF1 2)
❑ Depleted Below bark Surface (All)
❑ Depleted Dark Surface (0)
0 Other (Explain in Remarks)
ED thick Dark Surface (Al2)
❑ Redox Depressions (F8)
❑ Sandy Mucky Mineral (Sl) (LRR N,
❑ Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
'MLRA 147,148)
'MLRA 136)
❑ SandyGleyed Matrix (S4)
E]'Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122)
'Indicators of hydrophyhc vegetation and
Sandy Redox,(S5)
❑ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (1`19) (MLRA 148)
wetland hydrology must be present,
Stripped Matrix (S6)
❑ Red Parent .Material,(F2i),(MLRA127,-147)-
-unless disturbed or qPlemanc
Type,
Depth (inches)
rRemaFrks;
No hydric soil indicators are present.
Hydric Soil Present? Yes Ja No ❑
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2 0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
Project/site Barrier Road 100 kV Tap Tranmission Line Ciry/County..Rockwell /Cabarrus. - -_ Sampling Date 2/26/2014
ApplicanUOwner Duke Energy t T _ State NC Sampling Point dp12
investigator(s), =Eric Mulatskl & Matt McKinney Section, Township, Range _
Landform (hdlsiope, terrace, etc )• depfession _ __ _ _ _ , Local relief (concave, convex, none)` concave Slope (%) <1
Subregion -(LRR or MLRA) _LRRP _ - Lat- 35.499_ _ _ _-
Long _80.510 -__ - Dat
um,
Soil Map Unit Name ChA'- Chewacla'loam, 0 to 2 %' §lo P es, -fFe 4 uentl flooded NWI classificau on.� none
- — ,
Are "climatic 1hXdroIGQ1c conditions on,th -,site typi al for this time of year? Yes = No (If no, explain in Remarks)
Are Vegetation Sod or Hydrologytj significantly disturbed? Are. "Normal Orcumstances" presents Yes No
Are Vegetation 'Soil ❑ or Hydrology i- - i naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks )
'SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point.locations, transects,}important teatures, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes�0% -- No L - = I Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Sod Present? Yes �I r 1 No rj_TL within'a Wetland? Yes 0✓ No 0
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yesl v 1 No,
Remarks -
Forested oxbow wetland (w6) located to the floodplain of Dutch Buffalo Creek (s3).
HYDROLOGY
'Wetland Hydrology Indicators
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primamindicators (minimum of one is required check all that apply) - --
❑ surface Soil Cracks (B6)
❑✓ Surface Water (Al)
❑True Aquatic Plants (B14)
❑ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8)
Q High Water Table,(A2)
❑ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
❑ Drainage Patterns (B10)
❑ Saturation (A3)
❑ Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living,Roots (C3)
❑ Moss Trim Lines (1516)
;❑ Water Marks (81)
❑ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
❑ Dry - Season Water Table (C2)
❑ Sediment'Deposits (82)
❑ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Sods (C6)
E]' Crayfish Burrows (C8)
❑ Drift Deposits (B3)
❑ Thin Muck Surface (C7)
❑ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
;❑ Algal Mat or Crust (84)
❑ Other (Explain in Remarks)
❑ Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
❑ Iron Deposits (65)
✓❑ Geomorphic Position (132)
Inundation'Visible on Aerial Imagery (67)
❑ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
D Water - Stained Leaves (Bg)
❑ Microtopographic Relief (D4)
Aquatic Fauna'(1313)
❑ FAC- Neutral Test (D5) a
r Field Observations -
i
-
- - �- - --
�
Surface Water Present? Yes, . ,
NoQ Depth (inches) 0-12
Water Table Present? Yes=
No I= Depth (inches) 0 I
I"1 0
n �;
Saturation'Present? Yes Q
No Depth (inches)
Wetland
Hydrology Present? Yes No
` inciudes,ca ilia klh a 1,
'
Descnbe,'Redorded Data,(stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos previous inspections), ifavailable`
Remarks
-
Primary and secondary wetland hydrology indicators are present
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2 0

VEGETATION (Five Strata) - Use scientific names of plants. Sampling PolntAp12
Tree Stratum
Absolute Dominant Indicator
% Cover Species? Status
Dominance Test worksheet.
(Plot size -30--ft _ _ _ )
_
1- LlquidAmbar `styraclflua _
20 Yes FAC
Number of Dominant Species
That Are bBL,.FACW, or FAC 6- (A)
2 Acer'rubrum
20 Yes FAC
-�
Total Number of Dominant
Speaes Across Ail Strata :6 (B)
Percent of Dominant Species
-
3. - - - -
,
4 --- -- - -
-- - - -- _- - -- - - - - -
,.5.
Thauke OBL, FACW, or FAC 100_ _ _ _ (A/B)
40 =Total Cover
Prevalence Index worksheet
50% of total cover 20
20% of total cover 8
__ _
Total,% Cover of Multiply by
Sing Stratum (Plot size 15 -ft __ - -_T I
OBL species x 1 =
1; Ace rubrum
20 Yes
FACW species x 2 =
-
FAC species x 3 =
FACU °species x4=
_r _FAC
2'Llqutdambar styraciflua - '- -� " 10 Yes FAC
_!-
UPL species x 5
,4 -- - -- -
-- - -
Column Totals (A) (B)
-
Prevalence Index = BIA =_
30 = Total Cover
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators
u 50% of total cover 15
_20% of total cover 6
❑ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
Shrub Stratum (Plot size 15jt -I,
❑ 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
❑ 3 Prevalence Index
1 ___ _ _ _ — _ _ _ _ _
_ _ _ _
- is 53 0'
4 - Morphological Adaptations' Provide supporting
❑ data in Rearks�or on a separate sheet] p g
- - _ -
3
❑ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
4,
'Indicators of hydnc soil and wetland hydrology must
5.- -
-
be present, unless disturbed or problematic
= Total Cover
Definitions-of Five Vegetation Strata
50% of total cover
20% of total cover 4
Tree - 1Noody plants, excluding woody vines,
Herb Stratum (Plot size -5-ft - _ j
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and 3 in
1 Alhum ascalOnlCUm
10_ Yes NI, _
•(7 6 c( n) or larger in diarneterat breast height (DBH)
Sapling - Woody,plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20,ft (6 m) or more in height and less
than 3Tin (7 6 cm) DBH
Shrub - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) in height
Herb - Ale herbaceous (non- woody) plants, including
herbaceous vines,, regardless,of size, and woody
plants, except Woody vines, less than approximately 3
2 �_.
_ -;- _____ _ _ _ _ _, _ -___ _— t- _
'3.
,4: — -" - -
5— - - - - - - - - -- - -- - - - =- -- -
6
1= R -
_
8 _
It (1 m) in height
16
Woody vine - All woody vines, regardless of height
-- - -- - -- - - -
- _ - - -- - -- - - -
11.
-
- -
_
- 20 -_ Tntal L"nVPr
509/6 of total cover 10
20% of total cover 4
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size 30 -ft )
1_L'onlceri4aponlca___ __ - __�
5- __ Yes FAC_
2rBlgnornaaapreolata = 5 Yes FAC
3
,4.-
!
Hydrophytic
_- -- -- _- -- - - -T - - 10
_ = Total Cover
Vegetation
Present? Yes II No�
50% of total cover, 5
20 % of total cover 2
Remarks (Include photo numbers hereof on a separate
sheet)
Hydrophytic vegetation Is dominant
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2 0

i
f
ji
I
1
SOIL
Sampling Point dp12
ProfilwDescription• (Describe to the depth needed ocume
to dnt the indicatorror confirm the absence,-,of indicators')' -
Depth Matrix Redox Features
066es Color (moist) % -Color (moist)- % -Type °' Loc Texture Remarks
0 -22 1OYR 5/2 50 5YR 4/6 45 C M clay loam
10YR 2/1 5 C M _
f ZL ti PL' -Por 'Limn M -Matrix
' 7 e C=C oncentration; D =De letion, RM= Reduced Matr(x, MS =Macke d S d G m an ras
Io
LJ Histosol (A1)
❑ Histic Epipedon (A2)
❑ Black Histic (A3)
❑ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
❑ Stratified Layers (A5)
❑ 2 cm Muck (Al 0) (LRR N)
❑ Depleted Below'Dark Surface (All 1)
M Thick Dark,Surface (Al2)
y ❑ ^Sandy Mucky�Mineral (S1) (LRR N,
MLRA 147, 148)
❑ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (54)
❑ Sandy Redox (S5)
❑ Stripped Matrix (S6)
Type
Depth (inches)
p Dark Surface (S7)
❑ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
❑ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
Q Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
❑ Depleted Matrix (F3)
❑ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
❑ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
❑
Redox, Depressions (F8)
❑ Iron- Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 136)
❑ Umbnc Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122)
❑ Piedmont Floodplain Sods (F19) (MLRA 148)
❑ Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147)
Hydric soil indicators are present.
i I
US Army Corps of Engineers
Indicators for Problematic Hydric S
❑ 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
❑ Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
(MLRA 147, 148)
❑ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
(MLRA 136, 147)
❑ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
L] Other (Explain in Remarks)
'Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
wetland hydrology must be present,
unless disturbed or problematic
Hydric Soil Present- Yes No
Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2 0
US Army Corps of Engineers
Indicators for Problematic Hydric S
❑ 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
❑ Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
(MLRA 147, 148)
❑ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
(MLRA 136, 147)
❑ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
L] Other (Explain in Remarks)
'Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
wetland hydrology must be present,
unless disturbed or problematic
Hydric Soil Present- Yes No
Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2 0

t
1
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM -Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
Project/Site Barrier Road 100 kV Tap Tranmission Line City /County Rockwell /Cabarrus, _ _ Sampling Date, 2/26/20-14
Applicantlowner _Duke Energy State NC Sampling Point dP13
Investigator(s)_Eric Mularski & Matt-McKinney Section, Township, Range _ -
Landform (hdlslope, terrace, etc ) :.hilISIOp6 Local relief (concave, convex, none) convex- _ Slope ( %) <1
Subregion (LRR or MLRA) LRRP - _ fiat 35 499 Long - -80510_ . _ _ _ Datum --
Soil'Map Unit�Name Chk- Chewacla loam, 0 to 2 %6lopes,4frequently flooded NWI classificabori :- none _
Are,climatic / h rolo it conditions on the site typicallfor. is time of year? Yes s✓ No (If no, explain in Remarks)
Are Vegetation -- Sod ❑ or Hydrology' I 'significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes= No=
Are Vegetation _ Soil �, or Hydrology��fnaturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transacts, important features, etc.
Hydrophybc Vegetation Presents Yes 0 No� ~i Is the Sampled Area T
Hydnc Sod Present? Yes. No. ✓ ; within a Wetland? Yes 0 No 0
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes N0= I ,
Remarks
;Upland data point for forested oxbow wetland.
I
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators.
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required check all that apply) - - - - -
0 Surface Soil Cracks (B6)
_
❑ Surface Water (Al) ❑ True Aquabc Plants (1314)
❑ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (BS)
❑ High Water Table (A2) ❑ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
❑ Drainage Patterns (B10)
❑ Saturation (A3) ❑ Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
❑ Moss Trim Lines (B16)
❑ Water Marks (131) ❑ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
❑ Dry Season Water Table (C2)
❑ Sediment Deposits (62) ❑ „Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Sods (C6)
❑ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
❑ Drift Deposits (B3) ❑ Thin Muck Surface (C7)
❑ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
❑ Algal Mat or Crust (B4) ❑ Other (Explain in Remarks)
❑ Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
❑ Iron Deposits (B5)
❑ Geomorphic Position (D2)
D inundation, Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
❑ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
❑ Water - Stained Leaves (B9)
❑ Microtopographic Relief (D4)
El Aquatic Fauna (B13)
❑ FAC- Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations: - -
Surface Water Present? Yes ❑ No, Depth (inches)
Water Table Present? Yes t____l No Q Depth (inches)
F41_
Saturation Present? Yes Q No= Depth (inches)
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes= No
includes dapillary fringe)
- - -
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitormg'well, aenal,ptiotos,:previous mspecpons) if available.
Remarks ' -
No primary or secondary wetland hydrology Indicators are present
US Army Corps of Engineers Easlem Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2 0

Y
vEVETATIUN (Five strata) - Use scientific, names of plants. Sarrtpling.Pomt; 11P13
30-ft
Absolute Dominant Indicator
Dominance Test worksheet-
Tree Stratum (Plot size _- )
% Cover Species? Status
Number of Dominant Species
1 Llquidambar styraclflua
20 Yes FAC
That Are OBL. FACW, or FAC,, 4 (A)
Total'Numtier of Dominant
2 Plnus'taeda - 20 Yes FAC-
3--
- - -
Species Across All Strata 6 (B)
Pert,enl of Dumindnt Species
That Are OBL,-FACW, or FAC 67
4:
- -- - - -- - -- — - - -
5 ~
40 =Total Cover
Prevalence Index worksheet
50% of total cover 20
-. 20% of total cover k -
- - Total °/G Cover of . _ __ _ _ Multiply by
Sapling, Stratum (Plot size -15-ft- - - ___«_I
OBL species x 1 = _-
1.Junlperus ylrglnlan8 -­ -- "
10 Yes FACU
FACW species x 2 =
FAC species x�3 =
2 Comus Honda 5 -Yes_ FACU i
-- -
- -
FACU species x 4
UPL species x 5 =
''3 -
Column Totals (A) (B)
Prevalence, Index = B/A =
16
15 = Total Cover
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators
50% of total cover 75
20% of total cover 3
❑ 1 . Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
Shrub Stratum (Plot size __t5 -ft __ ui
❑ 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
❑ 3 Prevalence Index 53 0'
1 - _
- is
4- Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
data m`Remarks,o'r on a separate sheet)
2
T_
❑ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
4—
-
'Indicators of hydnc sod and wetland hydrology must
,B
lie Nt6Se11t, unleab ilratwUed,ui piubleuidLI.
_ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _
= Total Cover
Definitions of Five Vegetation Strata -
50 % of total cover
20% of total cover 4
Herb Stratum (Plot size ,5-ft )
Tree - +Woody, plants, excluding woody vines,
20'ft m) or height
approximately (6 more in and,3 in
1, Allium ascalonicum__ __ -__ _ -- __ _ _
_ 2___ Yes_ -- -NI. -
(7 6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH)
Sapling - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 it (6 m) or more in height and less
than 3 in (7 6 cm) DBH
Shrub - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately' 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) in`height
Herb - All herbaceous (non - woody) plants, including
herbaceous vines, regardless of size, and woody
plants, except woody vines, less than'approxiniately 3
ft (1 m) in height
2. «
_
3 __
4- -
15 - - - - - -- - -- _- _'
6
7_
_
''a I
T
td
Woody vine - All woody vines, regardless of height
- - - - -
2 = Total Cover
50% of total cover 1
20% of total cover 0 4
) Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size _ 30 =ft
1,-16mcera,)aponlca
5 Yes FAC
Hydrophytic
2_ Smilax roGndlfolla _ 5 - Yes FAC
4'- -- - -_
5
_ _
- -- _- - - - -- - — -- _ _ 10 -- - - - -
= Total Cover
Vegetation
Present? Yes No=
50% of total cover 5
_ 20% of total cover_ 2
Remarks (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet)
Hydrophytic vegetation is dominant
US Army Corps of Engineers
Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2 0

SOIL Sampling Point. dp_13
Profile, Description- (Describe to the depth needed to d_ ocument the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators) -
Depth' - - Matrix- - - - Redox Features -- -- - -
(niches) Color (moist) -- Color (moist) % Tvner Loci Texture -- ---->Remark§ -- -
0=22- 10YR4/4 _ i6o
_r
:',T e' C =Concentration. D=D ledon. RM= Reduced'Matrix.,MS =Mesked,Sand Grains Aocation PL =13o,4 Lrnin . M =Matnxt
ric'Soil Indicators - -
— - -
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils':
❑ 147)
LJ Histosol,(A1)
❑ Dark Surface (S7)
2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA
y❑ Histic Epipedon (A2)
D Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA,147, 148)
❑ Coast Prairie Redox (A16) i
❑ Biack Histic (A3)
❑ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
(MLRA 147, 148)
❑ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
❑ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
❑ Piedmont Floodplain Sods (F19)
❑ Stratified Layers,(A5)
Depleted Matrix (F3)
(MLRA 136, 147)
❑ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
❑ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
❑ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
❑ Depleted Below,Dark Surface (A11)
❑ Depleted Dark,Surface (F7)
❑ other (Explain in Remarks)
❑ Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
D Redox Depressions (FB)
D Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N,
❑ Iron - Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 147, 148)
MLRA 136)
❑ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
❑ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
Sandy Redox (S5)
❑ Piedmo*Floodplain Sods,(F19) (MLRA 148)
wetland hydrology must b&present.
�❑
❑ Stripped Matrix (S6)
Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147)
unless distukbed or problematic
Type - - -
Depth (inches): - -
marks
No hydric soli Indicators are present
4�
f
tl
I
(
i
i
1
- I Hydnc Soil,Present? Yes No a
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2 0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
Project/Site Barrier Road 100 kV Tap Tranmission Line City /County Rockwell /Cabarruss _ _ Sampling Date ,2/26/2014
Applicant/Owner, Duke Energy State NC Sampling Point d 151
Investigator(s) Eric Mularski & Matt McKinney Section, Township, Range
Landform (hdlslope, tefrace, etc) depmssion_. ___ _ Local relief (concave, convex, none) concave_ _ _ _ -Slope
Subregion (LRR or MLRA). LRRP Lat. 35495 _ _ Long -80:509_, = Datum —
Sod Map�Urnt Name ChA = Chewacla loam, 0 to`2 %slopes, frequently flooded Nwi classtficauon none _
Are climatic / ovdroloqic conditions on the site, typical for this time of year? Yes �, No (If no, explain in Remarks )
Are Vegetation - -- ,Sod �, or Hydrology`❑ significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes No
Are Vegetation _ -Soil,= or Hydrology= naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks)
SUMMARY of FINDINGS - Attach site mao showlno sampling point locations, transects, Important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes , No` ° Is the Sampled Area
Hydnc Sod Present? Yes ✓ NO within a Wetlands Yes i0 No _0
' Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes'F1 77 1 No
Remarks '
Linear forested wetland (w7) located in a relic agricultural conveyance. I
Wetland Hydrology, Indicators
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary'lndicators (minimum of one is required. ch'eck'all,that apply), _ = _ _ - -- _,
❑ Surface Sod Cracks (66)
❑ Surface Water (Al) 2 Y ❑ True Aquatic Plants,(B14)
❑Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (68)
Q High Water Table (A2) ❑ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1)
❑ Drainage Patterns (B1o)
Saturation (A3) ❑ Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
❑ Moss Trim Lines (1316)
❑ Water Marks (131) ❑ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4j
❑ Dry- season Water Table (C2)
❑ Sediment Deposits (62) ❑ Recent Iron Reduction in Tdled'Sods (C6)
❑ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
Drift Deposits (83) ❑ Thin Muck Surface (C7)
El, Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
❑ 'Algal Mat or Crust (84) ❑ Other (Ezplain'in Remarks)
❑ Stunted or,Stressed Plants (D1)
❑ Iron Deposits (65)
❑ Geomorphic Position (D2)
❑ Inundation'Visdile on Aerial Imagery (B7)
❑ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
D Water - Stained Leaves (139)
❑ Miaotopographic Relief (D4)
Aquatic, Fauna (1313)
❑ FAC- Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations
Surface Water Present? Yes No Q Depth (inches)
j Water Table Present? Yes 0 No = Depth (inches) 6
2
ILL No =.
Saturation Present? Yes ❑ No ❑ Depth'(mches)
Wetland
Hydrology Present? Yes
mcludes,ca dla fringe)-
- - - - -
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available
i
Remarks "
TI
Primary or secondary wetland hydrology indicators are present.
•
i
P
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and,Piedmont - Version 2 0

vtt t i m i wiv tr roe aaaia) — use scienunc names or
Tree Stratum (Plot size 30 -ft )
1 Liquidambar-styraciflua -
% Cover Species? Status
30 Yes FAC
' 2 Acer rubrum
20 Yes FAC
3
u
x 2 =
FAC species
x 3
FACU, species
x 4 =
UPL species _ _
x 5 =
50% of total cover 25
Sapling Stratum (Plot size -1 5A
50 - - _ = Total Cover
20% of total cover 10
—
- - -
1, 3
1,
6 - -- - -- - - - -
_ -
- = Total Cover
50% of total cover - 20% of total cover
Shrub Stratum (Plot size 15_ft _
1 -
4 - --
5 - - - -- - - - - -- -
= Total Cover
50% of total cover 20% of total cover 4
Herb Stratum Plot size Tree , Woody plants, excluding woody vine`s,
( 5 -ft ) approximately 20 It (6 m) or more in height and Tin
1- Arundlnarla,gigantea_ _ -5- _ - - Yes- _ - FACW (7 6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH)
2, _ Sapling - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
3 approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and'less
4 than 3 in (7 -6 cm) DBH
ng F2.i ap
Number of Dominant Species
That An- OBL „rArw, or rAC 3 (A)
Total 'Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata 3- (B)
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW; or FAC.- 100 _- (A/B)
=Total %Cover -of
_ Muluoly dy
OBL species
x 1 =
FACW species
u
x 2 =
FAC species
x 3
FACU, species
x 4 =
UPL species _ _
x 5 =
Column Totals
(A) (B) '
Index = B/A =
U 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
❑ 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
❑ 3 - Prevalence Index is 53 0'
❑A4 Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
ElProblematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
'Indicators of hydric sod and wetland hydrology must
be piesent, unless distuibed ui piublenidbL
Definitions of Five Vegetation Strata
7 - -- --- - - - --
9. _
5 = Total Cover
50% of total cover 2- 5 - 20% of total cover 1
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size. 30 -ft,
3
4.
50% of total cover
Shrub - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) in height
Herb - All herbaceous (non- woody) plants, including
herbaceous vines, regardless of size, and woody
plants, except woody vines, less than approximately 3
ft (1 m) in height
Woody vine - All woody vines, regardless of height
Hydrophytic
Total Cover Vegetation
20% of total cover Present?
Remarks (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet)
Hydrophytic vegetation Is dominant
Yes �✓ No=
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2 0

SOIL
Sampling Point dp14
Profile Description- (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators)
Depth Matrix _ -- -Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) - - %— --Color fmoistl _ %$— - Tyne ' = Loc Texture _Remarks
0 -3 10YR 4/3 100 _- sdty_Gay loam
3 -22 10YR 5/ _ 90 1M 6/6 10 - silty clay loans
',Trrae' C=Concentrabon: D =Depletion. RM= Reduced'Matnz, MS= Masked Sand Grains __2Locatlon „PL =Pore Lining. M= Matrix __-
H dtic Sod Indicators-
-
Indicators for Problematic HyarIC sons? -
Histosol (Al)
❑ Dark Surface (S7)
❑ 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
❑ Histic Epipedon (A2)
❑ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
❑ Coasti Prairie Redox (A16)
❑ Black Histic (A3)
❑ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
(MLRA 147, 148)
❑ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
❑ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (1719)
❑ sittrahhed Layers (A5)
❑✓ 'Depleted Matrix (F3)
(MLRA 136, 147)
❑ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
❑ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
❑ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
❑ Depleted'Below Dark Surface (A11)
❑ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
0 Other (Explain in Remarks)
❑ Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
❑ Redox Depressions (F8)
D Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR,N,
❑ iron- Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 147, 148)
MLRA 136)
❑ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
❑ Umbric Surface (F13),(MLRA 136, 122)
3Indicators of hydrophytic'vegetation and
❑ Sandy,Redox (S5)
❑ Piedmont Floodplain Sods (F19),(MLRA 148)
wetland hydrology must be present,
❑ Stripped Matrix (S6)
❑ Red Parent'Malerial (F21) (MLRA 127, 147)
unless disturbed or probiemabc
Type, --` —
Depth (inches)
No hydnc sod indicators are present.
Hydric Soil Present? Yes ❑ No ❑✓ _
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2 0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
'Project/Site Barrier Road 100 kV Tap Tranmission Line City /County Rockwell /Cabarrus Sampling Date 2/26/2014
Applicant/Owner Duke Energy _ _ _ State NC Sampling Point dp15
Investigator(s)', Eric MularskIA -Matt McKinney _ _ , Section, Township, Range, - - - -
Landfoem (hillslope, terrace, etc) hillslope - Local relief (concave, convex, none) - convex__ _ _ _ __ Slope ( %) <1
Subregion (LRR or MLRA) LRRP�T- x__35 495 Long -80 509 - Datum _
Soil`Map Unit Name ,ChA - Chewacla loam, 0'to 2 %'slo` a "s ,frequently flooded _ NWI classification none
Are climatic7,fi - rolo`ic conditions on, site typical ror his'time'of year? Yes v ii No (If no, explain in Remarks )
Are Vegetation — Sod'= or Hydrology,�isignificantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances' present? Yes =1 No ❑
Are Vegetation Sod ❑ :,or Hydrology ❑naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks )
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS'- Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc
Hydrophytic Vegetation Presents Yesr ✓' NO Is the Sampled Area ✓ -
Hydric Sod Present? Yes ❑ No ✓� P
within a Wetland? Yes 0 No 0
Wetlah&Hydroiogy Present? Yes = ,N471
Remarks
Upland data point for forested wetland (w7),
i
'HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators - -` - '— _ - -
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required check alfthat apply)
❑ Surface Sod Cracks (136)
❑ Surface Water (Al) ❑ True Aquatic Plants (1314)
❑ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
Q,High Water Table (A2) ❑ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
❑ Drainage Patterns (610)
❑ Saturation (A3) ❑ Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
❑ Moss Trim Lines (B16)
0 Water Marks (131) Ii0 Presence,of Reduced Iron (C4)
❑ Dry - Season Water Table (C2)
[] Sediment Deposits (132) ❑ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
❑ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
❑ Drift Deposits (133) ❑ Thin Muck Surface (0)
❑ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
❑ Algal Mat or Crust'(1314) ❑ Other (Explain in Remarks)
❑ Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
❑)Iron Depositsj!35)
❑.Geomorphic - Position (D2)
❑ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
❑ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
Water - Stained Leaves (89)
❑ Microtopographic Relief (D4)
n Aquatic Fauna (1313)
f ] FAC- Neutral Test (D5) ,
Field Observations -
Surface Water,Present? Yes ❑ No ❑✓ Depth (inches)
Water Table Present? Yes ❑ No 0 Depth (inches)
No
Saturation Present? Yes ❑ No Depth (inches)
Weiland
Hydrology Present? Yes ,F IM.
mcludes,ca filar fringe) _
- - - - -- — - - --
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge,. monitoring well, aenal photos; previous inspections), d available
Remarks
No primary or secondary wetland hydrology Indicators are present
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2 0

V_E_GETAIlUN (hive Strata) - Use scientmc names of plants
`— - - -�- `-
Tree Stratum (Plot size 30-ft
1, Quercus alba
)
_ _
-Absolute 'Dominant-Indicator-
% Cover Species? Status
- 50 Yes FACU ,
2 -s
x 2 =
FAC species
3
FACU species
x 4 =
5.-
x 5 =
Column Totals
(A) (B)
50% of total cover 25
I Sapling Stratum (Plot size 15 -ft
1 Liquidambar_styraciflua
50 = Total Cover
-- 20% of total cover 10 _
10 FAC
2 Acer rubrum _
_
5 ; FAC
,3, -
Shrub Stratum (Plot size 15 -ft
-1•
50% of total cover 7 5
- -- 1
15 = Total Cover
20% of total cover 3
2.
3
,
Herb Stratum (Plot size -5_ft --
1 Alhum ascalonlcum
50% of total cover •-
- -- -)
— = Total Cover
- 20% of total cover 4 -_
2 Yes NI
3 _
4, -
7.
8 - -
1L_
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size
1 ,Bignonla capreolata
50% of total cover 1
30 -ft )
- T
2 - - Total Cover
20% of total cover 04-
2 Yes FAC
3
5- - -- — - -
-
- -
mphng Point upla
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, uFFAC 3 (A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW,'or FAC
4 - (B)
75 (AFB)
Total % Cover of, _
Mul_tio_Iv by
OBL species
x 1 =
FACW species
x 2 =
FAC species
x 3 =
FACU species
x 4 =
- —r
UPL species
x 5 =
Column Totals
(A) (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A =
Hydrophytic vegetation Indicators—
El 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
❑ 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
❑ 3 - Prevalence Index is 53 0'
❑ 4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
❑ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
'Indicators,of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic
Tree - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and 3 in
(7 6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH)
Sapling - Woody, plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less
than 3 in (7 6'cm)'DBH
Shrub - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) in height
Herb ­All herbaceous (non- woody) plants, including
herbaceous vines, regardless of size, and woody
plants, except woody vines, less than approximately 3
it (1 m) in height
Woody vine - All woody vines, regardless of height
Hydrophytic
= Total Cover Vegetation �
50% of total cover 20% of total cover Present? Yes ET • ' No=
Remarks (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet )
Hydrophytic vegetation is dominant
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2 0

SOIL Sampling Point dp15
Profile Description- (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators)
---Matrix-- - - _ _
jnchesl ' Color (moist]- °- - %"
- -_- _ - Redox Features---- -
_Color (moist) % Tvoe' I:oc, Texture = - —Remarks-
9:3 - _ _ 10YR 3/3 _100—
__ _ _ _ _ clay loam
3,22 7 SYR 4!6 100
clay loam
"t' jpe C= Concentration. D =De lesion, RM= Reduced Matrix, MS= Masked Sand Grains 21-ocauon -PL =Pore Lmin ,_WMatnx
-rHY�-i Soif Indicators -
-` - indicators for Problematic Hydric Sods'
LJ H(stosol (Al)
❑ Dark Surface (57) ❑ 2 cm Muck (A1'0) (MLRA 147)
❑ Histic Epipedon (A2)
❑ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148) ❑ Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
❑ Black"Histic (A3)
❑ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148) (MLRA'147, 148)
? ❑ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
❑ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) ❑ Piedmont Floodplain Sods (F19)
i ❑ Stratified Layers (A5)
❑ Depleted Matrix (F3) (MLRA 136, 147)
❑ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
D Redox Dark Surface (F6) ❑ Very Shallow Dark,Surface (TF12)
❑ Depleted Below Dark Surface (A71)
❑ Depleted Dark Surface (F7) ❑ Other (Explain in Remarks)
❑ Thick bark Surface (Al2)
❑ Redox Depressions (F8)
D Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N,
❑ Iron - Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 147,148)
MLRA 136)
❑ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
❑ Umbric Surface (1`13) (MLRA 136, 122) 'Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and,
❑ Sandy Redox (S5)
❑ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148) wetland hydrology must be present,
❑ Stripped Matrix (S6)
❑ Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147) unless dis(urbed or problematic
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
-- -
Type ° -
-
✓
Sod Present? Yes No ❑
Depth (inches)"'- - _ - - --
- -
Hydnc
- Remarks -- �- -- - - - - —
No'hydric sod Indicators are present
E
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2 0

E
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
Project/Site Barrier Road 100 kV Tap Tranmission Line city /County Rockwell /Cabarrus sampling Date 2/27 /2014
Applicant/Owner Duke Energy _ _ _ _ State NC Sampling Point dP16
Investigator(s). ErICiMUlarskl &,Matt,McKinney__, ._ __ =__Section, Township, Range
Landform (hilislope, terrace, etc ) depression Local relief (concave, convex, none). - concave _ _ Slope'( °k)
Subregion (LRR or MLRA) LRRPat 35 495 Long -80 509- F Datum
Soil Map Unit Name RA - Chewacla loam, 0 to'2% slopes,-frequently flooded NWI classification, none
Are climatic hhiirolo is conditions on the site tyPS -_ his lime of year? Yes v i No (If no, explain in Remarks )
(�
Are Vegetation = Sod I t. or Hydrologsignificantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes No
Are Vegetation Sal'❑„or Hydrolog`naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks)
ZU1Y1[YIHKT Vr r119LJnYVJ - NllaGn ,ilC mall arilVwiny ,anilJnnly FJVUIa w..aawno, u011a0LAa2, nnFJV.aa..a .
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes ✓ l . No`'� <is the;sampied Area
Hydric Sod Present? Yes'T - 7 t Wo.-l^� within a Wetland? Yes ❑✓ No ❑ _
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes'� No IJ-
Remarks
Isolated emergent wetland (w8) located at the terminus of agricultural conveyance.
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators *
Secondary Iridicalors (minimum'of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required check all that apply)
[]Surface Sod Cracks (136)
_
❑✓ Surtace Water (A1) ❑ True Aquatic Plants (1314)
❑Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8)
M7 Water Table (A2) ❑ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1)
❑ Drainage Patterns (1310)
❑✓ Saturation (A3) Q Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
❑ Moss Trim Lines (B16)
❑ Water Marks (131) © Presence,of Reduced Iron (C4)
❑ Dry- Season Water Table (C2)
❑ Sediment Deposits (B2) Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Sods (C6)
❑ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
❑ Dnft,Deposits (63) ❑ Thin Muck Surface (C7)
❑ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery,(C9)
❑ Algal Mat or Crust (64) ❑ Other (Explain in Remarks)
❑ Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
❑ lion Deposits (135)
❑ Geomorphic Position (D2)
p Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7)
❑ Shallow Aquitard (63)
p Water - Stained Leaves (69)
Q,Microtopographic Relief (D4)
❑_ Aquatic Fauna (813)
❑ FAC- Neutral Test (135)
Field Observations
Surface Water`Present? Yes E:] No Q✓ Depth - (inches)
Water Table Present? Yes 0 No � Depth (inches) '6
4
n
Saturation Present? Yes Q No= Depth (inches)
Wetland
Hydrology Present? Yes No
includes capillary fringe)
- --
- Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitonng'well, aerial photos; previous inspections); if available--
Remarks
Primary wetland hydrology indicators are present
US Army Corps of Engineers
Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2 0

VEGETATION (Five Strata) — Use scientific names of plants. Samplinq Point dp16
30-ft
T Absolute Dominant Indicator
Dominance Test worksheet
Tree Stratum (Plot size
) % Cover Species? Status
Number of Dominant Species
1
Thdl Are OBL, FACW, or FAC , 1 _ _ - _ (A)
2 -
'
Total Number of Dominant
-
_ .
Species Across All Strata 2 (B)
4
Percent of Dominant Specie s
That Are'OBL, FACW, FAC 50
or (A/B)
= Total Cover
Prevalence Index worksheet
- - -
Total % Cover of Multiply by
50% of total cover 20% of total cover
- -
OBL species x 1 =
Sapling Stratum (Plot size )
I15 -ft
1. Acer rubrum
5 Yes _FAC
FACW species x z = _
FAC species x 3 = - --
=
FACU species x 4 =�
3.-
_ --
UPL species x 5 =
- - -- -- -- _ - _ -- - - -- - --
4
Column Totals - _ (A) (B)
- -- -- - - -
Prevalence Index = B/A =-
6 - _
5_ - = Total Covey
Hydrophytic Vegetagon Indicators - -
50% of total cover 2 5 - 20°/. of total cover 1
❑ 1 - Rapid Test for HydrophyUc Vegetation
Shrub Stratum (Plot size 15 -ft
_
❑ 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
❑
1.
3 - Prevalence' Index is 53 0'
❑ 4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting '
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) i
2 __ __ __ _ _
-
3.- _ - -- - - - -
- - -
❑ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain) {
-- - -- -
4
5-
'Indicators of hydnc sod and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic
= Total Cover
Definitions of Five Vegetation Strata.
50% of total cover .- 20% of total cover 4 - -
5-ft
Tree - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
Herb Stratum (Plot size
)
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and 3 in
1. Carex sp
50 Yes NI
(7 6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH)
Sapling - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20;ft (6 m) or more m height and less
than 3 in (7 6 cm),DBH
Shrub - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) in height
i
! Herb - All herbaceous (non - woody) plants, including
herbaceous vines, regardless of size, and woody
plants, except woody vines, less than approximately 3
2 Juncus effusus _10 No _ _FACW
3__- _ ___ _ _ - __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
4
-
5
B
7 - - - --
_ _ _ _ _ _ _
- -- — -- - - -
9
ft (1 m) iA height
-- _ - --- - __._ --
10
Woody vine - All woody vines, regardless of height.
11 -
- -- -- - - -- _-
60 -Total Cover
50% of total cover 30 20% of total cover 12
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size
30 -ft
2. -
3;
5 - - - -
Hydrophytic
= Total Cover i Vegetation
509'0 of total cover _ _ 209'0 of total cover _ _ __
Present> Yes ✓ ;fVo
Remarks (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet)
Hydrophytic vegetation is dominant
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2 0

I
SOIL
Sampling Point dp16
i;P,ro(ile7Description- (Describe to the depth'needed to document the indicator of confirm the absence of indicators )
Depth Matrix - Redox Features
(inches) Color(moist) % Color (moist) - c Texture Remarks -
10 -3 _ 10YR 4/3 100. f _ clay loam _
3 -22 10YR 5/2 60 5YR 5/8 40 RM PL clay loam
1TvnP r= CrtnCPniratinn. D .4DPnletinn',RM= Reduced Matrix. MS= Masked Sand-Grains _ ?Locati0n PL ='Pore Lininq :!M= Matrix
Histosol "(A1)
❑ Dark Surface (S7)
_❑
❑ Histic Epipedon (A2)
❑ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
�❑ Black,Histic (A3)
❑ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
❑ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
❑ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
❑ Stratifted,Layers (A5)
❑ Depleted Matrix (F3)
❑ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
❑ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
❑ Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
❑ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
❑ Thick Dark,Surface (Al 2)
D Rebok Depressions (F8)
❑ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N,
❑ Iron - Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 147, 148)
MLRA 136)
❑ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
❑ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122)
❑ Sandy Redox (S5)
❑ Piedmont Floodplam Sods (F19).(MLRA 148)
❑ Sfnpped Matrix (S6)
❑ Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147)
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Sc
2 cm Muck (Al 0) (MLRA 147)
❑ Coast Prairie Redox (Al 6)
(MLRA 147, 148)
❑ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
(MLRA 136, 147)
❑ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
❑ Other (Explain in Remarks)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
wetland hydrology must be present,
unless disturbed or problematic
Restrictive Layer (ifobseived)
Type.- - - - - - - - - n
Depth (inches) _ _ - -_ Hydnc Sod Present? Yes No 'E -
- Remarks -
Hydnc sod indicators are present
US Army Corps of Engineers
Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2 0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
Project/Site Barrier Road 100 kV Tap Tranmission Line cily /County Rockwell /Cabarrus - _ Sampling Date 2/27/2014
Applicant/Owner Duke Energy State NC Sampling Point dP17
Investigator(s) Eric Mularski & Matt McKinney _ Section, Township, Range .
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc ), hillslope Local,relief (concave, convex, none) - convex — . Slope
Subregion (LRR or MLRA), LRRP - Lat: 35.490 Long -80 503_ _ __ _ _ _ - Datum y -
Soil Map Unit Name ChA - Chewacla loam, 0 to,2% slopes, frequently flooded NWI classification none - -
Are climatic /,h rolo is conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No (IF no, explain m Remarks)
Are Vegetation i , Soil ❑, or Hydrology =--i significantly disturbed Are "Normal Circumstances" presents Yes= No=
Are Vegetation Soil'=: or Hydrology ❑ naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes, No Is the Sampled Area ✓ i
Hydric Sod Present? Yes ❑ No' ✓ within a`Wetland? Yes 0 No 0
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes = No
Remarks
Upland data point for emergent wetland (w8).
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators
Secondary Indicators (minimum of lwo`required)
all
Primary Indicators,immimum of one is required check all that a_lzolvl_
❑ Surface Sod Cracks (B6)
❑ Surface Water (Al) ❑ Aquatic Plants (1314)
❑ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (BB)
❑ High'Waler Table (A2) ❑ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1)
❑ Drainage Patterns (B10)
❑ saturation (A3) ❑ Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
❑ Moss Trim Lines (8 16)
❑ Water Marks (B1) ❑ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
❑ Dry - Season Water Table (C2)
❑ Sediment Deposits (B2) ❑ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Sods,(C6)
❑ Crayfish Burrows,(CS)
❑ Drift Deposits (133) ❑ Thin Muck Surface (C7)
❑ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
❑ Algal'Mat,or Crust (B4) ❑`Other'(Explain in Remarks)
❑ Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
❑ Iron Deposits (B5)
❑ Geomorphic Position (D2)
n Inundation Visible,on Aerial Imagery (B7)
❑ Shallow Aqwtard (D3)
Water - Stained, Leaves (B9)
❑ Microtopographic Relief (D4)
❑Aquatic Fauna (B13)
❑ FAG - Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations
Surface'Water Present? Yes ❑ No Q Depth (inches)
Water Table,Present? Yes Q No= Depth (inches)
=
Saturation Present? Yes Q No= Depth (inches)
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes Nci
includes ca dl'a .frin e -
-
- - - -
`Descnbe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available
Remarks
No primary or secondary wetland hydrology Indicators are present
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2 0

vtUt i A t wN (vive strata) - use scientitic names or plants: sampling Point apt r
Absolute Dominant Indicator Dominance Test worksheet
Tree Stratum (Plot size 30 -ft )', ° Cover Species? Status
Number of,Dominant Species
1: �~ ThAt Are Otil , FACW,- or FAC 1 (A)
2 Total Number of Dominant
3 - - -� _ _ - _ - -- - -- - - Species Across All Strata 2 (B)
4
- Percent of Dominant 5 sties
= Total Cover
50% of total cover 20% of total cover
Sapling Stratum (Plot size 15 -ft 1
1 Juhiperus virglniana 5 FACU
3 _
4
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC; 50 (A/B)
-Total %Cover of - ----.-"
•--- Multiply by
OBL species
x 1 =
FACW species
x 2 =
FAC species
x3=.
FACU species
x 4 = - --
UPL species
x 5 = J
Column Totals
(A) (B)
6
Prevalence Index = B/A = -
5 _ =Total Cover
50% of total cover 2 5 20% of total cover
Shrub Stratum (Plot size 15-ft t
1 , _ -
Hydrophybc Vegetation Indicators
❑ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytc Vegetation
❑ 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
❑ 3 - Prevalence Index is 53 0'
4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
data -in Remarks oi� on a 'separate sheet)
❑ Problematic Hydrophybc Vegetation' (Explain)
'Indiratom of hydnr sni and wptiand hydrolnrdy mast
be pieseu6 unless distui bed ui pioblerndhL
2,• r _
-
4 _ _
5:
- _ -- - - -
6
- = Total Cover
50% of total cover 20°/ of total cover 4
Definitions of Five Vegetation Strata-
°
5-ft
Troc - Woody plants, excluding woody, vines„
Herb Stratum (Plot size )
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more m "treighrand 3 in
1 ,Mlcroitegium yimineum- _ _ _ 80 Yes _ FAC
Q 6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH)
Sapling - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 ft (6_m) or more'in height and less
than 3 in (7 6 cm) DBH
Shrub = Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) in height
Herb - All herbaceous (non - woody) plants, including
herbaceous' vines, regardless of size, and woody
2 Allium ascalonlCUrl1 5 No NI
4
5 - — - -- - -- — —
16. " -' - -- -- --
7
'8 _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
plants, except woody vines, less than approximately 3
9. — - �- - -- - -- - - - -- - -- --
,T
It 0 m) in height
10
Woody vine - All woody vines, regardless of height.
65 = Total Cover
- _ -
500/. of total cover 42 5 20% of total cover 17
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size _30 -ft
4
' �- _ - _- _ "-•-- •- - - - - -- _ - -_- _ - - -- -- — _ - -• Hydrophybc
= Total Cover Vegetation
i 50% of total cover 20% of total cover present? Yes ✓n No=
'Remarks (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet)
Hydrophytc vegetation is dominant.
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2 0

SOIL �,ampung volnt -r
"'Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth - -- Matrix - ___ - Redox Features
(inches) -Color (moist)' -A - -- 'Color (moist) % Tvoe Loc Texture ^� - Remarks_ --
0_1_4 _10YR 4/3 _ „ 100_ _ clay loam _
14 -22 10YR 6%1 60 5YR 4/6 10 C M sandy clay loam
'Type C= Concentration, D= Depletion RM= Reduced Matrix, MS= Masked Sand Grains _ __ _?Lot
I LJ,Histosol (Al)
❑ Histic Epipedon (A2)
❑ Black Histic (A3)
"❑ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
❑ Stratified Layers (A5)
❑ 2 cm Muck (A10) OR N)
❑ Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
,❑ Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
D sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N,
MLRA 147, 148)
❑ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
❑ Sandy,Redox(S5)
r❑ Stripped'Matrix (S6)
❑ Dark Surface (S7)
D Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
❑ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
❑ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
Depleted Matrix (F3)
❑ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
❑ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
❑ Redox Depressions (F8)
❑ Iron - Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 136)
❑ Umbnc Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122)
❑ Piedmont Floodplam Sods (F19) (MLRA 148)
f3 Red Parent Matenal (F21) (MLRA 127 „147)
Type - _ -
Depth (inches) -
marks
No hydrlc soil Indicators are present-
on - PL= Pore Lining, M =Matrix _ _ -_.
Iridreators for Problematic Hydnc Sc
❑ 2 cm Muck (All 0) (MLRA 147)
❑ Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
(MLRA-147,148)
❑ Piedmont Floodplam Sods (1719)
(MLRA 136, 147)
❑ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
n Other (Explain in Remarks)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
wetland hydrology must be present,
unless disturbed or problematic
Hydnc Sod Present? Yes g No
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2 0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM – Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
,Project/Site,.Barrier'Road 100 kV Tap Tranmission Line City /county Rockwell /Cabarrus Sampling Date 2/27/2014
Applicant/Owner Duke Energy _ , State NC Sampling Point dp18
Investigator(s) , Eric Mularski & Matt,MCKlnney- _- Section, Township, Rahg& , - -- --
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc ) depression Local,reliefs(concave, convex, none) concave _ Slope m. <1
Subregion (LRR or MLRA) LRRP - Lat 35.503 Long -80 490 Datum _
Sod MapZnd Name ChA - Chewacla loam, 0 to 2% slopes, frequently flooded — W classification none
Are ,'climatic / h drolo ic'conditions on the sitetypic' l for his time of year? Yes Q No (If no, explain in Remarks)
Are Vegetabon Sod ❑, or Hydrology significantly disturbed,7 Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes ❑ No
Are'Vegetation - ,Soil ❑, or Hydrology'= naturally problematic? (if needed, explain any answers in Remarks)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attacn site map snowing sampling point locations, transects, IMIJUrlant rCULUICS, MI.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes F7_1 No1 Is the Sampled Area
Hydnc Sod Present? Yes I r '1 No - -- witMn awetland? Yes ❑✓ No . ❑
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes Nb'
Remarks
Forested wetland (w9) that hydrologically connected to a tributary to Dutch Buffalo Creek (s8) via a non - jurisdictional
;agricultural linear conveyance
HYDROLOGY
- Wetland Hydfology Indicators. - -- - -
- Secondary Indicators - (minimum of two required) 1
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required .check all that agg_lyl
❑ Surface Sod Cracks (136)
❑✓ ,Surface Water (Al) ❑ True Aquatic Plants (B14)
❑ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8)
Q High Water Table (A2) ❑ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
❑✓ Drainage Patterns (1310)
'Saturation (A3) ❑ Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
❑ Moss Trim Lines (1316)
�❑ Water Marks (61) ;❑ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
D Season Water Table C2
❑ ry -_ ( ) i
❑ Sediment Deposits (62) ❑ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
❑ Crayfish Burrows (CB)
❑ Drift Deposits (B3) ❑ Thin Muck Surface (C7)
❑ Saturation Visible on AeriaPlmag&y (C9)
❑ Algalwal or Crust (84) ❑ Other (Explain in Remarks)
❑ Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
❑ Iron Deposits (135)
❑ Geomorphic Position (D2)
❑ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
❑ Shallow Aquitard (D3) i
❑ Water - Stained Leaves (89)
❑ Microtopographic Relief (D4) J
❑Aquatic Fauna, (1313)
- -- -- _ - - -
❑ FAC- Neutral Test (D5) i
- _ - -- -
'Field Observations- - --
Surface Water Present? Yes No 0 Depth (riches)
1
Water Table, Present? Yes ✓❑ No ❑ Depth (inches) 3
1
� I
Saturation Present? Yes Q No ❑ Depth (inches)
Wetland
Hydrology Present? Yes i . i No;
includes ca filar fringe)
-_ - - - -- --
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections); d available -
Remarks
Primary wetland hydrology Indicators are present
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2 0

VEGETATION (Five Strata) - Use scientific-names-of plants Sampling Point opt s
-' ` -- - - -- - -�
30 -ft
"Absolute
Dominant Indicator
-DonunanceTestwofksheet- - - -_—
— -
Tree Stratum (Plot size )
% Cover
Species? Status
" Number of Dominant Species
1• Acer rubrum _
40
Yes FAC _,
Thal Are OBL, FACW, or FAC .-6- _ -_
Total Number of Dominant
Species,Acioss All'Strata 7
(A)
(B)
2 Llgwdambar styraciflua 20 Y_es FAC
____ —_. -_
3.,Platanus occidentahs ^ „_ - 1-6-- No FACW
5 -
- _
-
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC 86
(AIB)
6 -
70
= Total Cover
Prevalence Index worksheet
50 °h of total cover 35
°
20% of total cover 14
Total % Cover of. Multiply by
Sapling Stratum (Plot size 15-ft ) - -
—
- --
'OBL species x 1,=
- - - -
Acer rubru'l
10
_Yes FAC
FACW species
'FAC speaes _ — _ -- x'3'= - - -_-
FACU species z,4 =
-
2 -Fagus grandifolia- _ 5 Yes -_ _FACU_
--
UPL species x,5 =- --'---
- -
Column Totals _ @(A)
: (B)
4- -
-- - - -- -
Prevalence Index = B/A
15 = Total Cover
50% of total cover 7 5 20% of total cover 3
Shrub Stratum (Plot size 15 -ft t
1 i
2 - -
3
5 — - — - - -- -- -
6
Total Cover
50% of total cover 20% of total cover 4--
Herb Stratum (Plot size 5 -ft )
1 Microstegium vimineum 10 Yes FAC
2 Alllum ascalonicum 10 Yes_ NI
3
IJ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
❑ 2 - Dominance Test is 550%
3­ Prevalence Index is 53 0'
❑,4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
El Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
'Indicators of hydric sod and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless' disturbed or problematic
Tree -.Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately,20 ft (6 m) or more in height and 3 in
(7 6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH)
Sapling - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 it (6 m) or more in height and less
than 3 in (7P6 cm) DBH
Shrub - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) in height
7.
8 -- -
20 - Total Cover
Herb - All herbaceous (non - woody) plants including
herbaceous,virnes, regardless of size, and woody
plants, except woody vines, less than'approximately 3
ft 0 m) in height
Woody, vine - All woody vines, regardless of height
50% of total cover 10 20% of total cover 4- _
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size 30 -ft _ )
1 1-66icera japonica - - 5 Yes FAC
2 --
3
4.
5- -
5 Hydrophytic
__ = Total Cover Vegetation
50% of total cover 2.5 _ 20% of total cover Present? Yes ✓n No=
Remarks (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet) -
Hydrophytic vegetation is dominant
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2 0

SOIL
Sampling Point dp1'8
- Profile Descriptlon.,, (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absenceiof indica_ tors.)'
Depth Matrix - - .Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) - % Tvoe� Loct Texture Remarks- —
0 -3 10YR;p 100_ _ clay loam
3 -22 10YR 5/2 85 5YR 3/4 15 C M clay loam
',Type- CeConcenlration.,D=De letion: RM=ReducedWainx. MS= Masked -Sand Grains kocation. iPL =Pore i-An . M =Matrix
'H dfi- Sod Indicators
Indicators for Problematic Hydnc Sods' .
Histosol (Al)
❑ Dark Surface (57)
❑ 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
_�
❑ Histic Epipedon (A2)
❑ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
❑ Coast Prairie Redox (All 6)
❑ Black Histic (A3)
❑ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
(MLRA 147, 148)
❑ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
❑ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
❑ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F79)
❑ Stratified Layers (AS)
Depleted Matrix (F3)
(MLRA 136, 147)
+ ❑ 2,cm Muck (A10)'(LRR N)
❑ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
❑ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
❑ Depleted Below Dark Surface (A71)
❑ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
L] Other (Explain in Remarks)
4 ❑ Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
D Redox Depressions (F8)
D Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N,
❑ Iron= Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 147, 148)
MLRA 136)
❑ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
❑ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136,122)
'Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
❑ Sandy'Redox (S5)
❑ Piedmont Floodplain Sods (F19) (MLRA 148)
wetland hydrology must be present,
❑ Stripped Matrix (S6)
r] Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147)
unless disturbed or„pfable"!1C -
Type - -_
Depth (inches):,—_
marks ` -
Hydric soil indicators are present
IHydric Sod Present? Yes ❑✓ No
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2 0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
Project/Site Barrier Road 100 kV Tap Tranmission Line city /County Rockwell Cabarrus _ - sampling Date _2/27/2014__
Applican`t/Owner Duke Energy State" NC Sampling Point dp19
Investigator(s).. Eric Mularski & Matt MCkinney Section, Township, Range _
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc) hlllslope _ _— _- Local relief (concave, convex, none)_ convex Slope
Subregion (LRR or MLRA) LRRP . _ _ - Lat , 35 503 - _ . Long -80 490 _ _ Datum , _ _
Sod Map Unit Name ChA - Chewacla loam, 0 to 2% slopes, frequently flooded_ ,- - NWI classification none_ _ _
Are climatic/ h drolo is conditions on the site typi or This time of year,? Yes l v i No (if no, explain in Remarks)
Are Vegetation Sod ❑, or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes 0 No'❑
Are Vegetation Sod ❑. or Hydrology ❑.naturally problematic? (if needed, explain any, answers) in Remarks)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map she
Hydrophyhc Vegetation Present? Yes L �J `No
Hydnc Sod Present? Yes = INo
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes ❑, No
data point for forested wetland (w9)
HYDROLOGY
g sampling point locations, transects, Important reatures, etc.
Is the Sampled Area
within a Wetland? Yes 0 No
Wetland Hydrology Indicators.
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
,Primary Indicators (_minimum of one is required Ctieck'all that apply)__ - - -
❑ Surface3sod Cracks (66)
.[] Surface Water (A1) ❑ True Aquatic Plants (B14)
❑ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
❑ High Water Table (A2) ❑ Hydrogen'Suifide Odor (Cl)
❑ Drainage - Patterns (610)
❑ Saturation (A3) ❑`Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
[] Moss Trim Lines(B16)
❑ Water Marks (131) ❑ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
❑ Dry- Season Water Table (C2)
„❑ Sediment Deposits (132) ❑ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Sods (C6)
❑ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
Drift Deposits (133) ❑ Thin Muck Surface (C7)
❑ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
(,❑
❑ Algal Mat or Crust (64) ❑ Other (Explain in Remarks)
❑ Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
❑ Iron Deposits (65)
❑ Geomorphic Position'(D2)
❑ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (67)
❑ Shallow Aquitard (133)
❑ water•S(ained Leaves (69)
❑ Microtopographic Relief (D4)
❑ Aquatic Fauna (1313)
❑ FAC- Neutral Test (D5)
Field observations --
Surface Water Present? Yes ❑ No F7_1 Depth (inches)
Water Table Present? Yes ❑ No= Depth (inches)
Y
Yes= No,-
Saturation Present? Yes Q No= Depth (inches)
Wetland Hydrology Present? =V( -_.
includes capillary_ frin
Descnbe,Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available
'Remarks - -- - - - - - _
- -- — -
No primary or secondary wetland hydrology indicators are present
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2 0

VEGETATION (Five Strata) _ Use scientific names of plants. Sampling Point. dp19
'Tree Stratum (Plot size r30_11 _ _ __ _ __ -), % Cover Species? Status Number of Dominant Species
1 Acer ruhnim _ - _ 20 Yes FAC That Are OBL, FACW; or FAC, 4 (A)
2 Llq6iciirn6 slyracdlua - 20 Yes FAC
Total Number of Dominant
3
Species Across All Strata 5 (B)
4.
J - - - - - - - — -- - - - - - - - Percent of Durillndnt Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC 80 (A/B)
6� -
50`Y° of total cover 20% of total cover
Herb Stratum (Plot size 5 -ft )
1 Allium amblonicum __ __ _ __ _ _ _ 5 - Yes
Tree - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and 3 in
Nh_ (7 6 cm) orlarg6r in diameter at breast height (DBH)
5,
6
8 -
g,
10-
11. - _ --- - - - - - -- _ - -- - - - - - -
5 - = Tntal Cover
50% of total cover 2 5 20% of total cover
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size 30 -ft )
1 Lonicera japonica _ 5_ Yes FAC
3- -- - --
4
Sapling - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 ft (6,m) or more in height and less
than 3 in (7 6 cm) DBH
Shrub - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 3 to 20 it (1 to 6 m) in height
Herb - AII herbaceous (non-woody) plants, including
herbaceous vines, regardless of size, and woody
plants, except woody vines, less than apprmiimately 3
it (1 m) in height
Woody vine - All woody vines, regardless of height
5- - - - -- — _ - Hydrophytic
5 = Total Cover Vegetation
50 % of total cover 2 5 20% of total cover 1
Present? Yes M No=
Remarks (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet )
Hydrophytic vegetation is dominant
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2 0
40 , = Total Cover
Prevalence Index worksheet -
50% of total cover 20
20 °.6 of total cover $
Total % Cover-of _ _ _ _Multiply by
Sapling Stratum (Plot size j5 -ft - )
; OBL species x 1 = -- - -"
1; Acer fubrum
10 Yes FAC
FACW species x 2 =
FAC species x 3 =
;,FACU species x 4 = -
2;Fagus,g�andlfolia -- ' 5- Yes FACU
- - -- --
UP species x 5 =
4. - - - -
- - -
Column Totals (A) Y (B)
_ ;
Prevalence Index = B/A =
6
_
15 = Total Cover
'Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators*
50% of total cover 7 5
20% of total cover 3
❑ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
Shrub Stratum (Plot size 15 -ft
❑ 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
❑ Prevalence
1 - _ _
_ _ _
'
3 - Index is 53 0'
❑ 4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
data in Remarks of on a separate sheet)
2 - - -T - - Y - - - '
- -
1
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
4
'Indicators of hydnc sod and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disluibud or Nruble niabc
5 -- - - - - -- - -- - - -- _
6
= Total Cover
nea....::�� �• c...e v..r.... s- - -
50`Y° of total cover 20% of total cover
Herb Stratum (Plot size 5 -ft )
1 Allium amblonicum __ __ _ __ _ _ _ 5 - Yes
Tree - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and 3 in
Nh_ (7 6 cm) orlarg6r in diameter at breast height (DBH)
5,
6
8 -
g,
10-
11. - _ --- - - - - - -- _ - -- - - - - - -
5 - = Tntal Cover
50% of total cover 2 5 20% of total cover
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size 30 -ft )
1 Lonicera japonica _ 5_ Yes FAC
3- -- - --
4
Sapling - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 ft (6,m) or more in height and less
than 3 in (7 6 cm) DBH
Shrub - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 3 to 20 it (1 to 6 m) in height
Herb - AII herbaceous (non-woody) plants, including
herbaceous vines, regardless of size, and woody
plants, except woody vines, less than apprmiimately 3
it (1 m) in height
Woody vine - All woody vines, regardless of height
5- - - - -- — _ - Hydrophytic
5 = Total Cover Vegetation
50 % of total cover 2 5 20% of total cover 1
Present? Yes M No=
Remarks (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet )
Hydrophytic vegetation is dominant
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2 0

I
SOIL Sampling Point dp19
rProfile Description (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators) ,-
Depth - - Matrix - -- - - )Redox`Features-
Griches_1 - Color (moist) % Color (moist) % _ Tyne — - Texture - - Remarks-
0 " -22 10YR 4/3 100- clay loam _
',-!Type, C= Concentration, D =De le4on -RM=Reduced Matrix MS= Masked Sand Grains 'Location PL=-Pore Lining, M =Matrix
Tleic Soil Indicators: -
Indicators for'Problematic Hydnc,Soils'
Htstosol (Al)
❑ Dark Surface (S7)
❑ 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
—
❑ Histic Epipedon (A2)
D Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
❑ Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
❑ Black Hisbc (A3)
❑ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, .148)
(MLRA 147, 148)
110 Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
❑ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
❑ Piedmont Floodplam Sods (F19)
Stratified Layers (A5)
❑ Depleted Matrix (F3)
(MLRA 136, 147)
+I❑
❑ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
D Redox Dark Surface (F6)
❑ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
❑ Depleted Below Dark Surface (All 1)
❑ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
❑ Other (Explain in Remarks)
❑ Tfiick,Dark Surface (Al2)
D Redox Depressions (F8)
it Sandy.Mucky,Mineral (S1) (LRR N,
❑ Iron - Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 147, 148)
MLRA 136)
❑ Sandy,Gleyed Matrix (S4)
❑ Umbr+c Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122)
'Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
` ❑ Sandy Redox (S5)
❑ Piedmont Floodplain Sods (F19) (MLRA 148)
wetland hydrology must be present,
❑ Stripped Matrix (S6)
Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147)
unless disturbed orproblematic___ -
Type
Depth, (inches). -
marks No hydric soil - indicators are present
Hydric Sod Present? Yes g No
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2 0

t
t
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
ProjecUSite Barrier Road 100 kV Tap Tranmisslon_Llne city /county Rockwell /Cabarrus - _ Sampling Date 2/27/2014,_
AppGcanUO - - - Duke Energy - State -NC Sampling Point dp20
Invesngator(s) ,-Erlc`Mularskl & Matt Mcklnney Section, Township, Range —
Landform (hdlslope, terrace, etc )_�depresmn Local relief (concave, convex, none):-concave- _ _ _ Slope ( %) <1
Subregion (LRR or MLRA)_ LRRP L:at • 35 490. _ _: _ _ _ Long =80 497 - Datum _ -
Sod Map Unit Name CcD2= Cecll'sandy�clay loarrt, 8 to 15 %'slopes, eroded NW[classificanon none_
Are climatic / h droto is conditions, the site typic�al fort�his time ofryear? Yes _ No (If no, explain imRemarks')
Are Vegetation Sod' ❑ „or Hydrology L 'significantly disturbed Are ',Normal circumstances” present? Yes= No' ❑'
Are VegetatOn - - Sod ❑ or Hydrology ❑ naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map, showing sampling point locations, transects, Important features, etc
-Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yesf�177__ No ❑ Is the,Sampled-Area
Hydnc Sod Present? Yes ✓ ' N`o, within a Wetland? Yes ❑ No ❑
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No= A'
Remarks
Forested wetland (w10) located in the floodplaln of a tributary to Dutch Buffalo Creek (s9) The existing floodplaln Is
currently used as a cattle pasture
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two reauwred)
Primary Indicators,(minimum of one is rewired
,cWck all,thA apply)- _ _ - - - -
❑ Surface Sod cracks (B6)
0 Surface Water (All) r
❑ True Aquatic Plants (1314)
❑ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8)
❑✓ High Water Table (A2)
❑ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
❑ Drainage Patterns (B10)
❑✓ Saturation (A3)
❑ Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
[] Moss Trim Lines (B16)
❑ Water Marks (B1)
❑ Presence of Reduced Iroh (C4)
❑ Dry- Season Water, Table (C2)
❑ sedimentbeposits (B2)
❑ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Sods (C6)
❑ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
i,❑ Drift Deposits (133)
❑ Thin Muck Surface (C7)
❑ Saturation Visible,on Aerial Imagery (C9)
❑ Algal Mat or Crust (B4)
❑ Other (Explain in Remarks)
❑ Stunted or Stressed Plants (131)
❑,Iron Deposits (135)
❑ Geomorphic Position (D2)
❑ Inundation Visible,on Aerial Imagery (137)
❑ Shallow Agwlard (D3)
❑✓ Water - Stained Leaves (B9)
❑ Micr "otopographic Relief (D4)
❑Aquatic,Fauna (B13)
❑ FAC- Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes ❑
No [:= Depth (inches)
I
Water Table Present? Yes 0
No ❑ Depth (inches) 12 -
6
IZI
Saturation Present? Yes Q
No ❑ Depth (inches)
Wetland
Hydrology Present? Yes No ; - _
includes capillary fringe)-
Describe Recorded Data (stream "gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available
Remarks
tPnmary,wetland hydrology indicators are present.
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2 0

VEGETATION (Five Strata) - use scientific names of plants.
Tree Stratum (Plot size 30 -ft- ) % Cover Species? Status
1,Acer, rubrum - - 70 Yes FAC
2. Llgutdanlbar styraclflua 10 No FAC
3
5 - -- - _ - - - - - - -- -
6
80 = Total Cover
50% of total cover 40 20% of total cover 16
SSa ling Stratum (Plot size 15A
4
Total Cover
50% of total cover 20% of total cover -
Shrub Stratum (Plot size -15-ft - -- -,1
4.
5
Sampling Po
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL„ FACW,,nc FAC 1 (A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata 1 (B)
Percent of D`ominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC 100 (A/B)
Total %Cover of _
Multiply by
OBL species
x 1 = l
_
FACW species
x 2 j -
FAC species
x3=-
FACU species
x4=. z_
UPL species _
x 5 - -
Column Totals:
(A) (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A =
❑ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
❑ 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
❑ 3 - Prevalence Index is 53 0'
❑ 4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
'Indicators,of hydnc sod and wetland hydrology must
be pieseliL uules5 dialulbed tx piublenidli
=Tntalrnvw
50% of total cover 201% of total cover
Herb Stratum (Plot size- 5'ft )
Troo - Woody plants, oxcluding woody vines,
approximately 201 (6 m)'or more in height and 3 in
Q 6 cm) or'larger in diameter`at breast height (DBH)
Sapling -Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 it (6,m) or more in height,and less
than 3 in (7 6 cm) DBH
Shrub - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) in height
Herb - All hPrbacPous,(non- woody), plants, including
herbaceous vines, regardless of size, and woody
plants, except woody vines, less than approximately 3
ft (1 m)lin height
Woody vine - All woody vines, regardless of height
2.
3=
4.
5 - - - - - - - - - - - - -- _ _
7`
_ _
10.
- - - -
11. _ __
= Total Cover
50% of total cover,--- --- 20% of total cover
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size -30 -ft )
1.
3 -- - -
4 - -- --- ---
- - — - - - - - Hydrophytic
= Total Cover Vegetation
50% of total cover. 20% of total cover Present-7
Remarks (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet )
Hydrophytic vegetation is dominant.
Yes II No=
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2 0

SOIL Sampling Point d
Profile Description (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators) "
Depth Matrix
- Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) %
—Color (moist) -- • % Type' Loc'
Texture Remarks
0 -3 10YR 3/3 100
clay loam
3 -22 10YR 5/2 85
5YR 3/4 15 C M
clay loam
'' -T 0e _C= Concentration, D =De lelion, RM= Reduced Matrix, MS= Masked Sand Grains
2Location P-L =Pore Linn , M =Matrix
H dric Soil Indicators
o '
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Sod
-
Histosol (Al) (A1)
❑ Dark Surface (S7)
❑ 2 cm Muck (Al (Al0) (MLRA 147)
❑ Histic Epipedon (A2)
❑ Polyvalue Below,Surface(S8) (MLRA 147, 148) ❑ Coast Praine,Redox (A16) 1
❑ Black Histic (A3)
❑ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
(MLRA 147, 148)
❑ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
❑ Loamy Gleyed Matnx (F2)
0 Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
❑ Stratified Layers (A5)
Depleted Matrix (F3)
(MLRA 136 ;147)
❑ 2,cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
❑ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
❑ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
❑ Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
❑ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
❑ Other (Explain in Remarks)
❑ Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
❑ Redox Depressions (F8)
❑ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N,
❑ Iron - Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
'MLRA °147, 148)
MLRA 136)
❑ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
❑ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122)
'Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
❑ Sandy Redox (S5)
❑ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148) wetland hydrology must be present,
❑ Stnpped,Matrix (S6)
❑ „Red,Parent Material (F21) (MLRA127, 147)
_ unlessdisturbed or problematic
Restnctnre,Laye(if
Type, _
_
�
Sod Present? Yes No
Depth (inches)_. -- —
— —
Hydnc i—�
— -
Remarks- —
Hydric sod indicators are present.
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2 0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA =FORM — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
Project/Site Barrier Road 100 W Tap Tranmission Line aty /County Rockwell /Cabarrus Sampling Date_,2/27/2014
Applicant/Owner ,Duke.Energy____ _ - _State NC Sampling Point dp21
c
Investigator(s) Eri Mularski & Matt McKinney �� Section, Township, Range`
Landform (hilislope, terrace, etc') hillslope Local relief (concave, convex, none) convex ^^ - Slope ( %) <1
Subregion (LRR or'MLRA): LRRP Lat 35 490 Long, -80 498 ,Datum
Sod Map Unit Name, ChA - Chewacla_loam, 0 to 2% flooded Niivl classtrcat�on: none_
Are climatic !'h olo is conditions on the site typical1orthis time of year? Yes =J 'No �✓' No -- (If no, explain in Remarks)
Are Vegetation Soil i� ,or Hydrology,= significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes [= No
Are Vegetation Sod = or Hydrology) ='naturally problematic? (If needed; explain any answers in Remarks )
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, Important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes I NR Is the Sampled,Area
Hydnc Sod Present? Yes = No�� within a Wetlands Yes No 0
Wetland Hydrology_Present? _ Yes =_
Remarks - —
Upland data point for forested wetland (w10).
4
HYDROLOGY
Wetland'Hydrology-lndicators — - - - — - - - —
Secondary Indicators`(mimmum'of two'required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required, check all that apply)
❑ Surface Soil Cracks (66)
❑ Surface,Water (Al) ❑ True Aquatic Plants (614)
❑ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (88)
Q High Water Table (A2) ❑ Hydrogen Sulfide Odon(C1)
[] Drainage Patterns (1310)
, QSaturation (A3) ❑ Oxidized Rhgospheres on Living Roots (C3)
❑ Moss Trim Lines (1316)
❑ Water Marks (Bt) ❑ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
❑ Dry- Season Water Table (C2)
,❑ Sediment, Deposits (132) ❑ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Sods (C6)
❑ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
❑ ;Drift Deposits (133) ❑ Thin Muck Surface (C7)
❑ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
❑ Algal Mat or Crust (B4) ❑ Other (Explain in Remarks)
❑ Stunted or Stressed Plants (131)
❑ iron Deposits (135)
❑ Geomorphic Position (D2)
❑ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7)
Shallow Aquitard (D3)
❑•Water - Stained Leaves (139)
❑ Microtopographic Relief (D4)
DAquatic Fauna (1313)
[] FAC- Neutral Test (D5)
—
Field- Observatibns�
Surface Water Present? Yes No ❑✓ Depth (inches)
Water Table Present? Yes ® No Q Depth (inches)
F11-1
n
Saturation Present? Yes Q No Depth (inches)
Wetland
Hydrology Present? Yes No
tricl6des,ca dla ,Fran e
Describe Recorded Data °(stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available -
- - -- - - -- - -- -
Remarks =- -- _ _ - _
No primary or secondary wetland hydrology Indicators are present
i
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2 0

VEGETATION (Five Strata) — Use scientific names of plants.
Tree Stratum (Plot size 30 -ft )
1. Liguldambai 4yraclflua_"._" _ _ _ _ _ _
Aosoiute uommant inaicator
% Cover Specie "s 7 Status
__ 50 Yes FAO
2 Acer'iubrurn
20 Yes FAC
FACW species
x 2 =
4
x 3 = -
5,
x 4 =
UPL species
x 5 = - - - --
50% of total cover 35
'Sapling Stratum (Plot size 15 -ft
1
70 = Total Cover
20% of total cover 14
2-- _ _
-
'6
-
-_ - J - - - -- - - � V - - -- —
50% of total cover
Shrub Stratum (Plot size 15-ft )
1
_
- -- - =Total Cover -
20% of total cover
2
3.
4 -- - - — - - - --
r_- - -
5 - -
6 -- -- - --
- --
50% of total cover
Herb Stratum (Plot size 5 -ft )
= Total Cover
20 %,of total cover
2 -
3
5 -- — - —
Sampling Point dp21
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC 2 (A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species, Arro95 All Strata 2 (B)
Percent of,Dommant Species 100
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC (A/B)
Total % Cover of
Multiply by..,
OBL species
x 1 =
FACW species
x 2 =
FAC species
x 3 = -
FACU species
x 4 =
UPL species
x 5 = - - - --
Column Totals _
(A) (B)
Prevalence index = B/A =
❑ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
❑ 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
❑ 3 - Prevalence Index is s3 0'
❑ 4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
❑ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
tie present, unless disturbed or problematic
Definitions of Five Vegetation Strata.
Tree - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 It (6 m) or more in height and 3 in
(7 6 cm) or, larger in diameter at breast height (DBH)
Sapling - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 ft,(6 m) or more in height and less
than 3 in () 6,cm) DBH
Shrub - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) in height
7• _ _ ` - -- - -- ` _ - _ _ - - Herb - All'herbaceous (non- woody) plants, including
g herbaceous vines, regardless of size, and woody
plants, except woody vines, less than approximately 3
9. it (1 m) in height
10
11.- - - - -- _ _ _ _ Woody vine - All woody vines,, regardless of height
^J = Total Cover
50310 of.total cover 20% of total cover
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size 30 -ft )
1.
2- -
4. -- - -- -- — --
5
Hydrophytic
= Total Cover Vegetation
50% of total cover 20% of total cover -
Presenter Yes ✓n No=
-Remarks "(Include photo-numbers here-or on a separate sheet) - -- - - - -
Hydrophytic vegetation Is dominant
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2 0

SOIL Sampling Point dp21
to the denthfneeded to
of
Depth Matrix _ Redox Features = -
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Tvoe Loc Texture Remarks
0 -22 10YR 4/3 100 clay loam,
'Type C =Coneenl ration;, D =Depletion,,RM= Reduced�MatPlx. MS= Masked Sand Grains 2Location PL= Pore,Linmq, M=Mairiz'
H dric Soil Indicators
-
Indicators for Problematic HydiieSods':
Histosol (Al)
❑ Dark Surface (S7)
2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
❑ Polyvalue Below Surface'(S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
❑ Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
❑ Black Hislic (A3)
❑ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
(MLRA 147, 148)
❑ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
❑ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
❑ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
❑ Stratified Layers (A5)
❑ Depleted Matrii,(1`3)
(MLRA 136, 147)
❑ 2 cm Muck (A10) (I-RR N)
❑ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
very Shallow Dark Surface (TF.12)
❑ Depleted Below Dark Surface (Al 1)
❑ Depleted Dark Surface (177)
❑ Other (Explain in Remarks)
❑ Thick -Dark Surface (Al 2)
Redox Depressions (F8)
❑ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N,
❑ Iron - Manganese Masses'(F12) (I-RR N,
MLRA 147, 148)
MLRA 136)
❑ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
❑ Umbnc Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122)
'Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
❑ Sandy Redox (S5)
❑ Piedmont Floodplain,Sods,(F19) ",(MLRA 148)
welland`hydrology must be present,
❑ Stripped Matrix (56)
F1 Red Parent Maienal (F21) (MLRA'127, 147)
unless disturbed or problematic
Type; - - - -- -
Depth Cinches)
marks
No hydrlc soil Indicators are present
Hydric Sod Present? Yes ❑ No_
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2 0

Barrier Road 100 kV Tap Line Transmission Line Project
Section 4041401 Authorization
Photograph #3 - s1 (tributary to Dutch Buffalo)- looking downstream
Photograph #4 -s2 (tributary to Dutch Buffalo) - looking upstream

Barrier Road 100 kV Tap Line Transmission Line Project
Section 404/401 Authorization
Photograph #7 - s3 (Dutch Buffalo Creek) - looking downstream
Photograph #8 - dp7 - looking north

Y
�i
S
.n
`Fy�F
4t
r xY•
1 tl'
4 • ' ! r� �a
a 4 jV x
t' C
k
I
�M:

IM)l Barrier Road 100 kV Tap Line Transmission Line Project
Section 4041401 Authorization
Photograph #11 -w5 (forested linear wetland) - looking east I
Photograph #12 - s5 (tributary to Dutch Buffalo) - looking east

Barrier Road 100 kV Tap Line Transmission Line Project
Section 4041401 Authorization
Photograph #13 - w6 (forested linear wetland) - looking north
I Photograph #14 -s6 (tributary to Dutch Buffalo) - looking east

Barrier Road 100 kV Tap Line Transmission Line Project
Section 4041401 Authorization
Photograph #15 -w7 (forested linear wetland) - looking south
Photograph #16 -s7 (tributary to Dutch Buffalo) - looking west

Barrier Road 100 kV Tap Line Transmission Line Project
Section 4041401 Authorization
Photograph #17 -s8 (tributary to Dutch Buffalo) - looking upstream (north)
I Photograph #18 -w8 (emergent wetland) - looking north I

Barrier Road 100 kV Tap Line Transmission Line Project
Section 4041401 Authorization
Photograph #19 w9 (forested wetland) - looking west
Photograph #20 -s9 (tributary to Dutch Buffalo) - looking downstream

Barrier Road 100 kV Tap Line Transmission Line Project
Section 4041401 Authorization
I Photograph #21 - w10 (forested wetland) - looking east I
Photograph #22 - s10 (tributary to Dutch Buffalo) - looking north