20140870 Ver 1_401 Application_20140814

0 0
TIMMONS .GROUP
' YOUR VISION ACHIEVED THROUGH OURS.
I
u
1001 Boulders Parkway
Suite 300
Richmond, VA 23225
August 7, 2014'
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers- Wilmington District
Asheville Regulatory Field Office
151 Patton Avenue, Room 208.
Asheville, NC 28801 -5006
Attn: Mr. William Elliot
Applicant: Boulevard Phase III, LLC
.511 East Blvd
Charlotte, NC 28203
Attn: Darryl Hemminger
Dear Mr. Elliot:
P 804.200.6500
F 804.560.1016
www.timmons.com
pllr, t i 2014
wdwlo Qi stom wa's - 6rmnch
Re: Pre - Construction Notification
(PCN) for Nationwide Permit 29
Boulevard Homes Connector Road
Charlotte, North Carolina
On behalf of Boulevard Phase III, LLC (Applicant), Timmons Group, Inc. (Timmons) is
submitting this Pre - Construction Notification (PCN) for authorization under the requirements of
Nationwide Permit (NWP) 29 for the proposed Boulevard Homes Connector Road (Site)'. This
PCN is being submitted for unavoidable permanent impacts to jurisdictional streams associated
with the construction of a two lane road and pedestrian sidewalk that will serve as a connection
between Boulevard Homes lReclevelopment (recently renamed "The Renaissance ") and the
existing Central Piedmont Community College (CPCC) Harris Campus (see Enclosure 1: Pre -
Construction Notification Form). The proposed road connection was a condition of zoning
based on a traffic impact analysis to ease pressure at the intersection of West Boulevard and
Billy Graham Parkway. The Boulevard Homes Redevelopment Project consists of the
construction of 250 apartments, 110 senior living units, a K -8 school, and a Child Development
Center. The connection to the CPCC Harris Campus is important due to the fact that it links this
community to an important educational resource in order to provide a workforce development
for its residents.
The proposed project is located approximately 0.5 mile east of the Douglas International
Airport in Charlotte, NC (see Enclosure 2: Vicinity Map). The 2.2 acre project area consists of
mid - successional hardwood forest with gently rolling terrain. General land use in the vicinity of
the project consists of a mix of residential and commercial structures, undeveloped forested
land, and the Douglas International Airport. The Site is drained by an unnamed tributary to
Taggart Creek and is located with the Lower Catawba Watershed, Hydrologic Unit Code (HUC)
03050103 (see Enclosure 3': HUC map). .
The Site's design consists of a two lane roadway, pedestrian sidewalks, and the
associated stormwater structures including curbs, drop inlets, and outfalls. To accomplish the .
CIVIL ENGINEERING I ENVIRONMENTAL I SURVEYING I GIS I LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE I CONSTRUCTION SERVICES

goals of the project, impacts to jurisdictional areas are unavoidable. The location of impacts to
jurisdictional waters of the U.S. identified within the project limits are attached as Enclosure 4:
Waters of the U.S. Impacts Map. Jurisdictional impacts associated with the construction of the
Site include 142 linear feet of intermittent stream required for the installation of a 48" reinforced
concrete pipe, headwalls, and the placement of Class I riprap for the inlet and outfall protection
of the pipe. Installation of the culvert pipe is required to provide the hydrologic connection of
this intermittent tributary beneath the proposed roadway. In order to avoid secondary impacts to
the stream, the culvert shall' be countersunk 6" below the natural streambed at both the inlet and
outlet of the structure to convey low flows.
A wetland delineation was conducted by Timmons to identify the presence and location
of jurisdictional wetlands and other waters of the U.S. within the project limits in accordance with
the guidance provided by the 1987 U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USAGE) Wetland
Delineation Manual and subsequently issued USACE guidance. A Final Jurisdictional
Determination for the Site was confirmed by the USACE on January 21, 2011 (see Enclosure 5:
Jurisdictional Determination Letter and Enclosure 6: Original Wetland Delineation Map).
Unfortunately, during the design of the project, the project limits shifted slightly causing portions
of the proposed limits of disturbance to be outside of the confirmed jurisdictional determination
limits. The areas outside of the original jurisdictional determination limits have since been re-
evaluated in the field and did not reveal any additional jurisdictional features present onsite. A
map depicting the update project limits as well as data collected during the re- evaluation which
includes additional wetland determination data forms and representative photographs are
attached as Enclosure 7: Updated Wetland Delineation Information.
A FEMA flood map is included for your review (see Enclosure 8: FEMA FIRM Map). The
map shows the project area within Zone X, meaning that it is in an area of minimum flood
hazard. Because the proposed work is outside of the 100 year floodplain, no increase in the
100 year flood elevations is anticipated.
A query of available'on -line threatened and endangered species information was
performed to gain insight regarding the presence of sensitive flora and fauna in association with
this project. Online database searches were completed using the U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service's (FWS) Information, Planning, and Conservation System database, and the North
Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources' (NCDENR) Natural Heritage
Program database. The species lists generated from these searches are attached as Enclosure
9: Threatened and Endangered Species Information.
A query of the Northl Carolina State Historic Preservation Office using the HPOWEB GIS
Service was performed for the project area and the vicinity (0.25 miles from Site boundaries) to
determine the effect, if any, that the project would have on cultural resources. The results found
that there are no architectural or archeological resources within the search area. The map
generated is attached for your review as Enclosure 10: Cultural Resource Map.
I

ion Based on the above information and attached supporting documentat o , t h e app licant
requests approval of the proposed activity under the requirements of NWP 29. Please review
the enclosed material and contact Jason Bohdan at 804 - 200 -6386 if you have any questions or
require further information. Thank you for your attention to this project.
Sincerely,
Timmons Group
Xi----
Bohdan, PWS, PWD
Environmental Project Manager
I
Enclosures:
1. Pre - Construction Notification Forms
2. Vicinity Map
3. HUC Map
4. Waters of the U.S. Impacts Map
5. Jurisdictional Determination Letter
6. Original Wetland Delineation Map
7. Updated Wetland Delineation Information
8. FEMA FIRM Map
9. Threatened and Endangered Species List
W. Historical Resource Map and Sites
11. Agent Authorization Form
i

ENCLOSUREI
PRE - CONSTRUCTION NOTIFICATION FORMS

of W A rE,,
� o�
q
J y
O
20140870
Office Use Only:
Corps action ID no.
DWQ project no.
Form Version 1.4 January 2009
Pre - Construction Notification (PCN) Form
A. Applicant Information
1. Processing
1a. Type(s) of approval sought from the Corps:
X❑ Section 404 Permit ❑ Section 10 Permit
1 b. Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number: 29 or General Permit (GP) number:
1c. Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps?
❑ Yes ❑X No
1d. Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply):
Q 401 Water Quality Certification — Regular ❑ Non -404 Jurisdictional General Permit
❑ 401 Water Quality Certification — Express ❑ Riparian Buffer Authorization
le. Is this notification solely for the record
because written approval is not required?
For the record only for DWQ
401 Certification:
❑ Yes © No
For the record only for Corps Permit:
❑ Yes ❑X No
1f. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for
mitigation of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank
or in -lieu fee program.
❑ Yes Q No
1g. Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties. If yes, answer 1 h
below.
❑ Yes ❑X No
1h. Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)?
❑ Yes © No
2. Project Information
2a. Name of project:
Boulevard Homes Connector Road
2b. County:
Mecklenburg
2c. Nearest municipality / town:
Charlotte
2d. Subdivision name:
The Renaissance
2e. NCDOT only, T.I.P. or state project no:
3. Owner Information
3a. Name(s) on Recorded Deed:
Mecklenburg County Parks and Recreation
3b. Deed Book and Page No.
wig V
3c. Responsible Party (for LLC if
3d. Street address:
600 East Fourth Street
3e. City, state, zip:
Charlotte, NC, 28202 -2835 1 2014
3f. Telephone no.:
704- 336 -2472
704- 336 -5887 Ql►ALITY
3g. Fax no.:
3h. Email address:
Page 1 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

4. Applicant Information (if different from owner)
4a. Applicant is:
© Agent ❑ Other, specify:
4b. Name:
Boulevard Phase III, LLC
4c. Business name
(if applicable):
Darryl Hemminger
4d. Street address:
511 East Blvd
4e. City, state, zip:
Charlotte, NC 28203
4f. Telephone no.:
704 - 561 -5225
4g. Fax no.:
704 -561 -5228
4h. Email address:
I dhemminger @laurelstreetres.com
5. Agent/Consultant Information (if applicable) -
5a. Name:
Jason Bohdan
5b. Business name
(if applicable):
Timmons Group
5c. Street address:
1001 Boulders Parkway, Suite 300
5d. City, state, zip:
Richmond, Virginia 23225
5e. Telephone no.:
804 - 200 -6386
5f. Fax no.:
804- 560 -1648
5g. Email address:
Jason.Bohdan @timmons.com
Page 2 of 10

B. Project Information and Prior Project History
1. Property Identification
1a. Property identification no. (tax PIN or parcel ID):
11505108
1 b. Site coordinates (in decimal degrees):
Latitude: 35.213333 Longitude: - 80.921944
1c. Property size:
2.2 acres
2. Surface Waters
2a. Name of nearest body of water to proposed project:
Taggart Creek
2b. Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water:
C
2c. River basin:
Catawba
3. Project Description
3a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this
application:
The site consists of mid - successional hardwood forest with gently rolling terrain. General land use in the vicinity of the project consists of a mix of
residential and commercial structures, undeveloped forested land, and the Douglas International Airport.
3b. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property: 0
3c. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property: 142
3d. Explain the purpose of the proposed project:
The purpose of the project is to construct a road between CPCC Harris Campus Drive and Brooksvale Street which is required by zoning.
3e. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
The project consists of the construction of a two lane road, pedestrian sidewalks, the associated curb and gutter, and a culvert crossing.
4. Jurisdictional Determinations
4a. Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the
Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property /
project (including all prior hases lin the past?
© Yes ❑ No ❑ Unknown
Comments:
4b. If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination, what type
of determination was made?
❑ Preliminary ® Final
4c. If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas?
Name (if known): Brian Breissinger
Agency /Consultant Company: Timmons Group
Other:
4d. If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation.
January 21, 2011
5. Project History
5a. Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for
this project (including all prior phases) in the past?
❑Yes Q No El Unknown
5b. If yes, explain in detail according to "help file" instructions.
6. Future Project Plans
6a. Is this a phased project?
❑ Yes © No
6b. If yes, explain.
I
Page 3 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

C. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
1a. Which sections were completed below for your project (check all that apply):
❑ Wetlands ❑X Streams — tributaries ❑ Buffers ❑ Open Waters ❑ Pond Construction
2. Wetland Impacts
If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted.
2a.
Wetland impact
number
Permanent (P) or
Temporary T
2b.
Type of impact
2c.
Type of wetland
2d.
Forested
2e.
Type of jurisdiction
Corps (404,10) or
DWQ (401, other)
2f.
Area of
impact
(acres)
WI -
Choose one
Choose one
Yes/No
-
W2 -
Choose one
Choose one
Yes/No
-
W3 -
Choose one
Choose one
Yes/No
-
W4 -
Choose one
Choose one
Yes/No
-
W5 -
Choose one
Choose one
Yes/No
-
W6 -
Choose one
Choose one
Yes/No
-
2g. Total
Wetland Impacts:
2h. Comments:
N/A
3. Stream Impacts
If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this
question for all stream sites impacted.
3a.
Stream impact
number
Permanent (P) or
Temporary (T)
3b.
Type of impact
3c.
Stream name
3d.
Perennial (PER) or
intermittent (INT)?
3e.
Type of
jurisdiction
3f.
Average
stream
width
(feet)
3g.
Impact
length
(linear
feet)
S1 P
Culvert
Unnamed tributary
INT
Corps
2
142
S2 -
Choose one
-
-
S3 -
Choose one
S4 -
Choose one
-
S5 -
Choose one
_
S6 -
Choose one
-
3h. Total stream and tributary
impacts
3i. Comments:
Page 4 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

4. Open Water Impacts
If there are proposed impacts to lakes,' ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of
the U.S. then individually list all open water impacts below.
4a.
Open water
impact number
Permanent (P) or
Temporary T
4b.
Name of waterbody
(if applicable)
4c.
Type of impact
4d.
Waterbody
type
4e.
Area of impact (acres)
01 -
Choose one
Choose
02 -
Choose one
Choose
03 -
Choose one
choose
04 -
Choose one
Choose
4f. Total open water impacts
4g. Comments:
5. Pond or Lake Construction
If pond or lake construction proposed, the complete the chart below.
5a.
Pond ID number
5b.
Proposed use or
purpose of pond
5c.
Wetland Impacts (acres)
5d.
Stream Impacts (feet)
5e.
Upland
(acres)
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
P1
Choose one
P2
Choose one
5f. Total:
5g. Comments:
5h. Is a dam high hazard permit required?
❑ Yes ❑ No If yes, permit ID no:
5i. Expected pond surface area (acres):
5j. Size of pond watershed (acres):
5k. Method of construction:
6. Buffer Impacts (for DWQ)
If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below. If yes, then individually list all buffer impacts
below. If any impacts require mitigation, then you MUST fill out Section D of this form.
6a. Project is in which protected basin?
❑ Neuse ❑ Tar - Pamlico ❑ Catawba ❑ Randleman ❑ Other:
6b.
Buffer Impact
number—
Permanent (P) or
Temporary T
6c.
Reason for impact
6d.
Stream name
6e.
Buffer
mitigation
required?
6f.
Zone 1
impact
(square
feet )
6g.
Zone 2
impact
(square
feet
131 -
Yes/No
B2 -
Yes/No
B3 -
Yes/No
B4 -
Yes/No
B5 -
Yes/No
B6 -
Yes/No
6h. Total Buffer Impacts:
6i. Comments:
Page 5 of 10

D. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
1a Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project.
1b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques.
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts p to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for
impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State?
❑ Yes © No
2b. If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply):
❑ DWQ ❑ Corps
2c. If yes, which mitigation option will be used for this
project?
❑ Mitigation bank
❑ Payment to in -lieu fee program
❑ Permittee Responsible Mitigation
3. Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank
3a. Name of Mitigation Bank:
3b. Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter)
Type: Choose one
Type: Choose one
Type: Choose one
Quantity:
Quantity:
Quantity:
3c. Comments:
4. Complete if Making a Payment to In -lieu Fee Program
4a. Approval letter from in -lieu fee program is attached.
❑ Yes
4b. Stream mitigation requested:
linear feet
4c. If using stream mitigation, stream temperature:
Choose one
4d. Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only):
square feet
4e. Riparian wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4f. Non - riparian wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4g. Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4h. Comments:
5. Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
Sa. If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan.
�I
Page 6 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

6. Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) — required by DWQ
6a. Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires
buffer mitigation?
C] Yes C] No
6b If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation. Calculate the
amount of mitigation required.
Zone
6c.
Reason for impact
6d.
Total impact
(square feet)
Multiplier
6e.
Required mitigation
(square feet)
Zone 1
3 (2 for Catawba)
Zone 2
1.5
6f. Total buffer mitigation required:
6g. If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e.g., payment to private mitigation bank,
permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in -lieu fee fund).
6h. Comments:
Page 7 of 10

E. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ)
1. Diffuse Flow Plan
1 a. Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified
❑ Yes © No
within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
1 b. If yes, then is a diffuse flow plan included? If no, explain why.
❑ Yes ❑ No
2. Stormwater Management Plan
2a. What is the overall percent imperviousness of this project?
32%
2b. Does this project require a Stormwater Management Plan?
❑ Yes © No
2c. If this project DOES NOT require a' Stormwater Management Plan, explain why:
This project does not meet minimum density requirements to trigger a permanent stormwater management plan. The parcel that we are crossing with
the road is part of a larger undeveloped tract owned by Mecklenburg County Parks and Recreation. The Erosion Control / Grading Permit has been
issued by NCDENR for this project.
2d. If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan, then provide a brief, narrative description of the plan:
2e. Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan?
3. Certified Local Government Stormwater Review
3a. In which local government's jurisdiction is this project?
❑ Phase II
❑ NSW
3b. Which of the following locally - implemented stormwater management programs
❑ USMP
apply (check all that apply):
❑ Water Supply Watershed
❑ Other:
3c. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
El Yes ❑ No
attached?
4. DWQ Stormwater Program Review
OCoastal counties
❑HQW
4a. Which of the following state - implemented stormwater management programs apply
❑ORW
(check all that apply):
❑Session Law 2006 -246
[]Other:
4b. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
❑ Yes ❑ No
attached?
5. DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review
5a. Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements?
❑ Yes ❑ No
5b. Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met?
❑ Yes ❑ No
Page 8of10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

F. Supplementary Information
I. Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement)
la. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal /state /local) funds or the
❑ Yes ❑X No
use of public (federal /state) land?
lb. If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an
environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State
❑ Yes ❑ No
(North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
1c. If you answered "yes' to the above, has the document review been finalized by the
State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval
letter.)
❑ Yes ❑ No
Comments:
2. Violations (DWQ Requirement)
2a. Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 21-1.0500), Isolated
Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards,
❑ Yes Q No
or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)?
2b. Is this an after - the -fact permit application?
El Yes ❑X No
2c. If you answered "yes' to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s):
3. Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement)
3a. Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in
❑ Yes 0 No
additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?
3b. If you answered "yes" to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the
most recent DWQ policy. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
This road will provide a connection between the Boulevard Homes Redevelopment and the Central Piedmont Community College Harris Campus.
The Piedmont Community College has been constructed and the Boulevard Homes Redevelopment has no proposed impacts to streams and /or
wetlands.
4. Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement)
4a. Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non - discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from
the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
Page 9 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an' area with federally protected species or
0 Yes No
habitat? i
J
J
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act
[I Yes El No
impacts?
5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted.
5d. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical
Habitat? II
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat?
❑ Yes No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat?
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal
governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation
Yes ❑ No
status (e.g., National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in
North Carolina history and archaeology)?
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?
B. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA-designat4d 100 -year floodplain?
❑Yes No
8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements:
Bc. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination?
FEMA flood zone map.
Applicant/Agent's Printed Name I
Cl,'°Ap—p- i &hVAg-,mt"9**8 igriature
Date
(Agenrs'signature is Valid only if'-an authorization
--letter from the applicant is provided.)
Page 10 of 10

S. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or
habitat?
❑ Yes Q No
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act
impacts?
❑ Yes ❑ No
5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted.
-
5d. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical
Habitat?
6. Essential Fish Habitat Cor s Requirement)
( P q )
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat?
❑ Yes © No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat?
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal
governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation
status (e.g., National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in
North Carolina history and archaeology)?
❑ Yes ❑ No
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?
B. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA- designated 100 -year floodplain?
❑ Yes Q No
8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements:
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination?
FEMA flood zone map.
I
Applicant/Agent's Printed Name
Date
Applicant/Agent's Signature
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization
letter from the applicant is provided.)
Page 10 of 10

ENCLOSURE2
VICINITY MAP

Path v \Rnd \.4dRS1- RnUIPv;;rr1 HOmes1GIS\COmmon Shared ExhibitsOlvd Homes Vicinity Map.mxc
�� -mac/ f ti� - - _ •- aM.a �. �•' � • /1 t Y
: 1
� '� J •
"R' ��a.
UUU;
mil F : l ^ . 1. \.
r l // /" � - _ � -tom ( • �, � t �-= � • t . " _. - , ,\ • -
SITE
/
724
AIL
v
z
G
Alf,
all
-
' � (' d � , — � `mac ---• � �t ' / � – I ,
I � ♦. ; � , _ ai�, � . �,-
all
Site limits are approximate.
Topographic imagery from USG S. ����; ,�'`• ti
0 2,000 4,000 t 6,000 Z
MOM Feet
BOULEVARD HOMES TIMMONS GROUP ! •' `��
MECKLENBURG COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
VICINITY MAP YOUR VISION ACHIEVED 'THROUGH OUR •
TIMMONS GROUP JOB NUMBER: 34851 U.S.G.S. QUADRANGLE(S): CHARLOTTE WEST
PROJECT STUDY LIMITS: 2.2 ACRES DATE(S): 2013
LATITUDE: 35" 12'44.6"N WATERSHED(S): LOWER CATAWBA
LONGITUDE: 80.55' 17.5" W HYDROLOGIC UNIT CODE(S): 03050103
These plans and associated documents are the exclusive property of TIMMONS GROUP and may not be reproduced in whole or in part and shall not be used for any purpose whatsoever, inclusive but not
,..,n•a r.. "..., GROUP

ENCLOSURE3
HUC MAP

L 1
E
I 3 >
W
S U
03050102 �g ="
R�mlo c
,(
y1t i{ za wk u F
:Wt'nci((t' - "IF I! d
(` = epp N ? WO
Gastn111(1 T ita l.11i ll♦t m4 O
i r
C K
r I imvt tt,rl
48 ; -
03050101 i
O
a � c
DATE m
1. f'11 1 F' rn 0712512014 h
Fait I. 1v%8 DRAWN BY t
_ \t tLi .: C. CHAPPELL
a s
DESIGNED BY n
03040105 C. CHAPPELL A
CHECKED BY
lti t�llrit 11)tCt` lief T111% do J. BOHDAN m
�l.ltil:t 1„
- r � 3
1.,_2,100'
a 1�ItI it it It D
Altt. _ rr c°
it 1, nc:,llt •
m
�\ 03050103
I I. ltlr` II
L .1
0 21,000 42,000
Feet
m
a
a -- J al
1tirJtliti;;t11 {± _—
{
t�t­let F c9i11tt,ae
Hill
L +Irl
it I I I
11,1: t,tt
\linrr,li
a
0
0
0
c
a
0
0
0
io
a
o
m
o
3
ON
a o
I
S4i,tr.tt� --
W
C
G
Q°
� m
m
W °
m
U
0
� a
m
>
J
v 0
�;
t
O
_
J >
O m
m
� v
O
030A40104
Legend
d
E
U
Site Marker
&ON mom
o
-in Lower Catawba (03050103)
D
■
�cENUUEER
3aes1
m
NC Hydrologic Unit Code- 8
SHEE'
iJ0 m
1 OF
1 m
a
0
0
0
c
a
0
0
0

EN L
C OSU RE 4
WATERS OF THE US IMPACTS MAP

Impacts Table
T—
i WATERS OF THE U.S. WITHIN THE PROJECT STUDY LIMITS HAVE BEEN
GPS LOCATED BY TIMMONS GROUP.
2 WATERS OF THE U.S. HAVE NOT BEEN CONFIRMED BY THE U.S. ARMY
CORPS OF ENGINEERS.
3 PROJECT LIMITS ARE APPROXIMATE
4�, TOPOGRAPHIC CONTOURS FROM MECKLENBURG COUNTY GIS DATA
Uf
Z
0
SCALE 1"=100'
0
0 100, 200'
c
DATE
0101114
C,
CHAPPELL
jJ DESIGNED BY
1: CHAPPELL
CHEO�fD By
3,BOHDAN
1"=l 0,
r) CL.
< <
U-)
u
<
CL_ 31
to
w LU
0
<
0
0
U0
z Lu
<
Lr)
s
uj
j <
Z
19
%� ,' ,,�� , , I ,' ' > O > EZ
cc
Of g
<
uj
15.
Lu 3
CC i
CL E
43
p
34851
CST I 1 OF 1
LEGEND
PROJECT STUDY LIMITS (22 ACRSS31
INTERMITTENT STREAMS
CENTERUNE
PERMANENT STREAM IMPACT
WATERS OF THE U.S. IMPACT
XX
IDENTIFICATION
TOPOGRAPHIC CONTOURS
i WATERS OF THE U.S. WITHIN THE PROJECT STUDY LIMITS HAVE BEEN
GPS LOCATED BY TIMMONS GROUP.
2 WATERS OF THE U.S. HAVE NOT BEEN CONFIRMED BY THE U.S. ARMY
CORPS OF ENGINEERS.
3 PROJECT LIMITS ARE APPROXIMATE
4�, TOPOGRAPHIC CONTOURS FROM MECKLENBURG COUNTY GIS DATA
Uf
Z
0
SCALE 1"=100'
0
0 100, 200'
c
DATE
0101114
C,
CHAPPELL
jJ DESIGNED BY
1: CHAPPELL
CHEO�fD By
3,BOHDAN
1"=l 0,
r) CL.
< <
U-)
u
<
CL_ 31
to
w LU
0
<
0
0
U0
z Lu
<
Lr)
s
uj
j <
Z
19
%� ,' ,,�� , , I ,' ' > O > EZ
cc
Of g
<
uj
15.
Lu 3
CC i
CL E
43
p
34851
CST I 1 OF 1

ENCLOSURE5
JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION LETTER

U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
WILMINGTON DISTRICT
Action Id. 201002083 County: Mecklenburg U.S.G.S. Quad: Charlotte West
NOTIFICATION OF JURISDICTIONAUDETERMINATION
Property Owner /Agent: Crosland Incorporated, Att'n: Mr. Darrvl Hemminger
Address: 5020 Weston Parkwav
Suite 300
Cary,'NC 27513
Telephone No.:
Property description:
Size (acres) 1_5 Nearest Town Charlotte
Nearest Waterway Taggart Creek River Basin Catawba
USGS RUC Coordinates N 35.213333 W - 80.921944
Location description Boulevard Homes Connector Road located between Brooksvale Street and CPCC West
Campus Drive.
Indicate Which of the Following Apply:
A. Preliminary Determination
Based on preliminary information, there may be wetlands on the above described property. We strongly suggest you have
this property inspected to determine the extent of Department of the Army (DA) jurisdiction. To be considered final, a
jurisdictional determination must be verified by the Corps. This preliminary determination is not an appealable action
under the Regulatory Program Administrative Appeal Process ( Reference 33 CFR Part 331).
B. Approved Determination
There are Navigable Waters of the, United States within the above described property subject to the permit requirements of
Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act and Section 404 of the Clean Water Act. Unless there is a change in the law or
our published regulations, this determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this
notification.
X There are wetlands on the above described property subject to the permit requirements of Section 404 of the Clean Water
Act (CWA)(33 USC § 1344). Unless there is a change in the law or our published regulations, this determination may be
relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this notification.
We strongly suggest you have the wetlands on your property delineated. Due to the size of your property and/or our
present workload, the Corps may not be able to accomplish this wetland delineation in a timely manner. For a more timely
delineation, you may wish to obtain a consultant. To be considered final, any delineation must be verified by the Corps.
X The waters of the U.S. on your property have been delineated and the delineation has been verified by the Corps. We
strongly suggest you have this delineation surveyed. Upon completion, this survey should be reviewed and verified by the
Corps. Once verified, this survey will provide an accurate depiction of all areas subject to CWA jurisdiction on your
property which, provided there is no change in the law or our published regulations, may be relied upon for a period not to
exceed five years.
_ The waters of the U.S. have been delineated and surveyed and are accurately depicted on the plat signed by the Corps
Regulatory Official identified below on . Unless there is a change in the law or our published regulations, this
determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this notification.
_ There are no waters of the U.S., to include wetlands, present on the above described property which are subject to the
permit requirements of Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (33 USC 1344). Unless there is a change in the law or our
published regulations, this determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this
notification.
The property is located in one of the 20 Coastal Counties subject to regulation under the Coastal Area Management Act
(LAMA). You should contact the Division of Coastal Management in Washington, NC, at (252) 946 -6481 to determine
' their requirements.
Page 1 of 2

' Action ID:
This delineation/determination has been conducted to identify limits of COE's Clean Water Act jurisdiction for the particular
site identified in this request. The dehneation/determination may not be valid for the wetland conservation provisions of the
Food Security Act of 1985. If you or your tenant are USDA Program participants, or anticipate participation in USDA
programs, you should request a certified wetland determination from the local office of the Natural Resources Conservation
Service, prior to starting work.
Placement of dredged or fill material within waters of the US and/or wetlands without a Department of the Army permit may
constitute a violation of Section 301 of the Clean Water Act (33 USC § 1311). If you have any questions regarding this
determination and/or the Corps regulatory program, please contact Steve Chapin at 828 -271- 7980x224
C. Basis For Determination
The site contains a stream channel that exhibits indicators of ordinary blyh water marks. The stream channel on the
property Is an unnamed tributary to Taggart Creek which flows into Taggart Creek which flows into the Catawba
River which is a Section 10 navigable -in -fact waterway at Lake Wylie that ulitmately flows into the Atlantic Ocean.
D. Remarks
E. Appeals Information (This information applies only to approved jurisdictional determinations as indicated in
B. above)
This correspondence constitutes an approved jurisdictional determination for the above described site. If you object to this
determination, you may request an administrative appeal under Corps regulations at 33 CFR part 331. Enclosed you will find a
Notification of Appeal Process (NAP) fact sheet and request for appeal (RFA) form. If you request to appeal this
determination you must submit a completed RFA form to the following address:
District Engineer, Wilmington Regulatory Division
Attn:Steve Chapin, Project Manager,
Asheville Regulatory Field Office
151 Patton Ave., Room 208
Asheville, North Carolina 28801 -5006
In order for an RFA to be accepted by the Corps, the Corps must determine that it is complete, that it meets the criteria for
appeal under 33 CFR part 331.5, and that it has been received by the District Office within 60 days of the date of the NAP.
Should you decide to submit an RFA form, it must be received at the above address by
* *It is not necessary to submit an RFA form to the District Office if you do not object to the determination in this
correspondence.
ICorps Regulatory Official:
' Date 01/21/2011 Expiration Date 01/21/2016
The Wilmington District is committed to providing the highest level of support to the public. To help us ensure we continue to
' do so, please complete the Customer Satisfaction Survey located at our website at http : / /regulatorv.usacesurvey.com/ to
complete the survey online.
Copy furnished:
Timmons Group
1
IPage 2 of 2

ENCLOSURE 6
ORIGINAL WETLAND DELINEATION MAP
1
1
1
1

I

ENCLOSURE7
UPDATED WETLAND DELINEATION INFORMATION

oll
OI
LEGEND
PROJECT STUDY LIMITS (2.2 ACRES,
WATERS OF THE U.S. (ONSITE 142 L F)
'11, 'x FIELD DATA STATION
18
5
& -
a
cc
WATERS OF THE U.S.
04101114
D-.. IV
C. CHAPPELL
DESIGNED BY
C. CHAPPELL
ED BY
J.BOHDAN
Qh FZ)5-3
F.1'
NOTES
1 WATERS OF THE U.S WITHIN THE PROJECT STUDY LIMITS HAVE BEEN
GPS LOCATED BY TIMMONS GROUP
2 WATERS =RS OF THE U.S HAVE NOT BEEN CONFIRMED BY THE U.S ARMY
CORPS OF ENGINEERS.
3 TOPOGRAPHIC MAPPING INFORMATION IS FROM U-S.G.S QUAD SHEET
CHARLOTTE WEST, 1993,
0
i FDS-4
u
0
uj
Lu
z
0
uj
o
Uzo
ul)
Z
Lu J
J
Lu
z
C) z
'j
C)
z
FDS-2
0
<
>
Lu
C2
SCALE 1-50'
A,
UJ
4(/
34851
—77, —,
ST
AA

•' •
TIMMONS GROUP
Photo
Representative Site Photographs
Boulevard Homes Connector Road
)finger)
Photo 2: View of FDS 2 depicting topographic relief, ground cover and understory vegetation.
(11- 17 -10, B. Breissinger)

• * *00aa
TIMMONS GROUP
Photo 3: View of upland
Representative Site Photographs
Boulevard Homes Connector Road
ion within the understory at FDS 3. (7- 17 -14, C. Farnsworth)
Photo 4: View of mid - successional forested conditions at FDS 4. (7- 17 -14, C. Farnsworth)

f •
TIMMONS GROUP
Representative Site Photographs
Boulevard Homes Connector Road
Photo 5: View of intermittent stream channel at WUS Flag 1 -3. (7- 17 -14, C. Farnsworth)
Photo 6: View of the intermittent stream channel and understory vegetation at WUS Flag 1 -7.
(7- 17 -14, C. Farnsworth)

•1••00!
• f
TIMMONS GROUP
Representative Site Photographs
Boulevard Homes Connector Road
Photo 7: View of existing road bed onsite. (11- 17 -10, B. 13reissinger)
�x.
Photo 8: Onsite a mid - successional mixed eastern forest is the dominant cover type.
(7- 17 -14, C. Farnsworth)
Y
R?
Photo 8: Onsite a mid - successional mixed eastern forest is the dominant cover type.
(7- 17 -14, C. Farnsworth)

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont
Project/Site: Boulevard Homes Connector Road City/County: Mecklenburg Sampling Date: 11/17/10
Applicant/Owner. Crosland Inc. State: NC Sampling Point: FOS -1
Investigator(s). B. Breissinger, J. Hatcher Section, Township, Range: N/A
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Hillslope Local relief (concave, convex, none): Concave
Slope ( %): 6 Lat: 35 °12'48.24" N Long: 80 "55'15.41" W Datum: NAD 83
Soil Map Unit Name: Wilkes loam, 15 -25% slopes NWI classification: UPL
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes ✓ No (If no, explain in Remarks.) ./
Are Vegetation . Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes • No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (if needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, Important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes ✓ No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No ✓ within a Wetland? Yes No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No 7
Locations of sampling points are shown on Drawing 4 Preliminary Wetland Delineation Map.
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two reeulred)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is reauired: check
all that apply _ Surface Soil Cracks (86)
_ Surface Water (Al) _
True Aquatic Plants (614) _ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (68)
_ High Water Table (A2) _
Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) _ Drainage Patterns (1310)
_ Saturation (A3) —
Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) _ Moss Trim Lines (1316)
_ Water Marks (131) _
Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) _ Dry- Season Water Table (C2)
_ Sediment Deposits (82) _
Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) _ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_ Drift Deposits (B3) _
Thin Muck Surface (C7) _ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_ Algal Mat or Crust (64) _
Other (Explain in Remarks) _ Stunted or Stressed Plants (131)
_ Iron Deposits (B5)
_ Geomorphic Positron (132)
_ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7)
_ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
Water- Stained Leaves (B9)
_ Microtopographic Relief (D4)
_ Aquatic Fauna (1313)
✓ FAC- Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No ✓
Depth (inches): N/A
Water Table Present? Yes No ✓
Depth (inches): '12
Saturation Present? Yes No ✓
Depth (inches). '12
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No ✓
includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
N/A
Remarks:
No primary indicators of wetland hydrology were observed within the sampling location. Vegetation passed the FAC
Neutral Test. Upland and Wetland species were observed in the sampling location indicating a seasonal shift in
vegetative plant communities.
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Peer - Review Draft 6 -25 -2009

VEGETATION — Use scientific names of plants. Sampling Point: FDS-1
Absolute Dominant Indicator Dominance Test worksheet:
Tree Stratum (Plot size: fl ) % Cover Species? Vitus Number of Dominant Species
1 Ulmus americans 40 Yes FACW That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 5 (A)
2 Liquidambar slyradflua 20 Yes FAC
Total Number of Dominant
3. Species Across All Strata. 7 (B)
4.
Percent of Dominant Species
5. That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 71 (A/B)
6.
7
Tree – Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and 3 in.
(7.6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH)_
Sapling – Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less
than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH.
Shrub – Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) in height.
Herb – All herbaceous (non- woody) plants, including
herbaceous vines, regardless of size. Includes woody
plants, except woody vines, less than approximately 3
ft (1 m) in height.
Woody vine – All woody vines, regardless of height.
2.
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of: Multiply by;
OBL species x 1 =
FACW species x2=
FAC species x3=
FACU species x4=
UPL species x5=
Column Totals: (A) (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A =
60 = Total Cover
swim Stratum (plot size: 15 ft )
1. Ulmus americans 40 Yes FACW
2 Juniperus virginiana 10 No FACU
3. Quercus falcata 5 No FACU
4•
5.
6.
7
Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15 ft 55 = Total Cover
)
1. Ligusbvm vulgars 10 Yes FACU
2 Ilex opaca 10 Yes FACU
3
4.
5.
6.
7.
=
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5 ft 20 Total Cover )
_ Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
✓ Dominance Test is >50%
— Prevalence Index is 53.0'
_ Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
_ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
1. Ulmus americana 10 Yes FACW
Tree – Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and 3 in.
(7.6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH)_
Sapling – Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less
than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH.
Shrub – Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) in height.
Herb – All herbaceous (non- woody) plants, including
herbaceous vines, regardless of size. Includes woody
plants, except woody vines, less than approximately 3
ft (1 m) in height.
Woody vine – All woody vines, regardless of height.
2.
3
4.
5'
6.
7'
8
g.
10.
11.
12.
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30 ft 10 = Total Cover
)
1 Lonicera japonica 10 Yes FAC
2.
3.
4 Hydrophytic
Vegetation
5 Present? Yes ✓ No
10 = Total Cover
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
Photos are located in Appendix B, Representative Site Photos,
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Peer - Review Draft 6 -25 -2009

SOIL Sampling Point. FDS -1
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the Indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix
Redox Features
finches) Color (moist) %
Color (moist) % Type oe Texture Remarks
0 -1
Organic
1 -3 7.5 YR 312 80
7.5 YR 5/4 20 D M sil
3 -8 7.5 YR 5/4 95
7.5YR 6/6 5 C M sl
8 -14 7.5YR 5/4 100
N/A N/A NIA N/A sl
'Type: C= Concentration. D =De letion, RM= Reduced Matrix, CS= Covered or Coated Sand Grains.
'Location: PL =Pore Lining, M= Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators:
indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils':
_ Histosoi (Al)
_ Dark Surface (S7)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2)
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
_ Black Histic (A3)
_ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
(MLRA 136, 147)
` Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
_ Loamy Gieyed Matrix (F2)
_ Red Parent Material (TF2)
,-_ Stratified Layers (A5)
_ Depleted Matrix (173)
_ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
— Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
_ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_ Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
_ Redox Depressions (F8)
_ Sandy Mucky Mineral (Si) (LRR N,
_ Iron- Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 147, 148)
MLRA 136)
_ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122)
'Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
Sandy Redox (S5)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
wetland hydrology must be present,
Stripped Matrix (S6)
unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type: N/A
Depth (inches): N/A
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No
No Hydric soils were observed in the sampling pit.
tUS Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Peer -Review Draft 6 -25 -2009

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont
Project/Site: Boulevard Homes Connector' Road City/County: Mecklenburg Sampling Date: 11/17/10
Applicant/Owner: Crosland Inc. State: NC Sampling Point: FDS -2
Investigator(s): B. Breissinger, J. Hatcher Section, Township, Range N/A
Landforrn (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Hillstope Local relief (concave, convex, none): Convex
Slope ( %): 15 Lat. 35 °12'44.94" N Long: 80 055'16.89" W Datum: NAD 83
Soil Map Unit Name: Mecklenburg fine sandy loam, 8 -15% slopes NWI classification: UPL
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes ✓ No (If no, explain in Remarks.) ./
Are Vegetation Soil , or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes • No
Are Vegetation Soil . or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Presents Yes ✓ No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No within a Wetland? Yes No
Weiland Hydrology Present? Yes No
Remarks:
Locations of sampling points are shown on Drawing 4 Preliminary Welland Delineation Map. Sampling location was
within a depressional man -made trenched area cut within the hillslope.
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two reouired)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is reouired: check
all that aoolvl
_ Surface Soil Cracks (66)
_ Surface Water (Al) _
True Aquatic Plants (B14)
_ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (68)
_ High Water Table (A2) _
Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
_ Drainage Patterns (810)
_ Saturation (A3) _
Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
_ Moss Trim Lines (1316)
_ Water Marks (131) _
Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Dry- Season Water Table (C2)
_ Sediment Deposits (62) _
Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
_ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_ Drift Deposits (83) _
Thin Muck Surface (C7)
_ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_ Algal Mat or Crust (134) _
Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Stunted or Stressed Plants (131)
_ Iron Deposits (65)
_ Geomorphic Position (D2)
_ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (87)
_ Shallow Aquitard (133)
_ Water - Stained Leaves (89)
_ Microtopographic Relief (134)
Aquatic Fauna (613)
_ FAC- Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No ✓
Depth (inches): N/A
Water Table Present? Yes No ✓
Depth (inches): '12
Saturation Present? Yes No ✓
Depth (inches): '12
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No ✓
includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
N/A
Remarks:
No primary indicators of wetland hydrology were observed within the sampling location.
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Peer - Review Draft 6 -25 -2009

VEGETATION — Use scientific names of plants. Sampling Point. FDS -2
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30 ft )
1 Juniperus virginiana
2 Liquidambar styraciflua
Absolute Dominant Indicator
% Cover Species? Status
10 Yes FACU
10 Yes FAC
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC, 4 (A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata, 6 (B)
Percent
That Are oOBL, FACW, or FAC: 67 (A/B)
3
4
5
6
7
Sapling Stratum (Plot size: 15 ft
1 Corpus florida
20 =Total Cover
5 Yes FACU
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
OBL species x 1 =
FACW species x2=
FAC species x 3 =
FACU species x 4 =
UPL species x5=
Column Totals: (A) (B)
Prevalence Index = B!A =
2
3
4
5
6.
7.
Shrub Stratum (Plot size, 15 ft }
1 Vaccinium corymbosum
=
5 Total Cover
20 Yes FACW
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
_ Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
✓ Dominance Test is >50%
_ Prevalence Index is 53.0'
_ Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
_ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
2
3
4.
5.
6.
7•
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5 ft }
1 Lonicera japonica
20 = Total Cover
5 Yes FAC
Definitions of Vegetation Strata:
Tree — Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and 3 in.
(7.6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH).
Sapling — Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less
than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH.
Shrub — Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) in height.
Herb — All herbaceous (non- woody) plants, including
herbaceous vines, regardless of size. Includes woody
plants, except woody vines, less than approximately 3
ft (1 m) in height.
Woody vine — All woody vines, regardless of height.
2
3.
4
5.
6.
7
8.
9
10.
11
12.
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30 It
1. Lonicera japonica
5 = Total Cover
10 Yes FAC
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes ✓ No
2.
3.
4
5,
10 = Total Cover
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on ,a separate sheet.)
Photos are located in Appendix B, Representative Site Photos.
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Peer - Review Draft 6 -25 -2009

SOIL Sampling Point: FDS -2
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix
Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) °6
Color (moist) % Tvoet Loc— Texture Remarks
0-4 7.5 YR 4/3 100
N/A N/A N/A N/A sl
4 -14 10YR 4/4 100
N/A N/A N/A N/A sl
'Type: C--Concentration D=De letion, RM= Reduced Matrix, CS= Covered or Coated Sand Grains.
=Location: PL =Pore UnIng. M= Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils':
_ Histosol (A1)
_ Dark Surface (S7)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2)
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
_ Piedmont Floodpiain Soils (F19)
_ Black Histic (A3)
_ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
(MLRA 136,147)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
_ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
_ Red Parent Material (TF2)
_ Stratified Layers (A5)
_ Depleted Matrix (F3)
_ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Depleted Below Dark Surface (Al 1)
_ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_ Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
_ Redox Depressions (F8)
_ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N,
_ Iron - Manganese Masses (1712) (LRR N,
MLRA 147, 148)
MLRA 136)
_ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136,122)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
_ Sandy Redox (S5)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
wetland hydrology must be present,
_ Stripped Matrix (S6)
unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type: N/A
Depth (inches): N/A
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No V�'
Remarks:
No Hydric soils were observed in the sampling pit.
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Peer - Review Draft 6 -25 -2009

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
Project/Site: Boulevard Homes Connector Road City /County: Mecklenburg Sampling Date: 7/17/14
Applicant/Owner: Boulevard Phase III, LLC State: NC Sampling Point: FDS -3
Investigator(s): C. Farnsworth, J. Bohdan Section, Township, Range: N/A
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.). Hill-slope Local relief (concave, convex, none): none Slope ( %): 4
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): P Lat: 35 °12'48.65" N Long: 80 °55'12.64" W Datum: NAD 83
Soil Map Unit Name: Wilkes loam, 15-25% slopes NWI classification: UPL
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation . Soil , or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes ✓ No
Are Vegetation . Soil . or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No ✓ Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No within a Wetland? Yes No X
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No y T�
Remarks:
i
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Se
mridary Indicators (minimum of two req)trr_7gd,
Surface Soil Cracks (66)
Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (68)
Primary In (minimum r it k all
Surface Water (A1) True Aquatic Plants (B14)
High Water Table (A2)
Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
Drainage Patterns (610)
Saturation (A3)
Oxidized Rh¢ospheres on Living Roots (C3)
Moss Trim Lines (1316)
Water Marks (B1)
Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
Dry- Season Water Table (C2)
Sediment Deposits (B2)
Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
Crayfish Burrows (C8)
Drift Deposits (B3)
Thin Muck Surface (C7)
Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
Algal Mat or Crust (B4)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
Iron Deposits (B5)
Geomorphic Position (D2)
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7),
Shallow Aquitard (D3)
Water - Stained Leaves (69)
Microtopographic Relief (D4)
Aquatic Fauna (B13)
FAC•Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No
✓
Depth (inches): 0
Water Table Present? Yes No
Saturation Present? Yes No
✓
✓
Depth (inches): '14
Depth (inches): '14
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No ✓
includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Five Strata ) — Use scientific names of P lants.
Sampling Point: FDS-3
Absolute Dominant Indicator OOMInanCe Test worKSheet:
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30 ) ° Cover Species? Status
Quercus Nbra 40 Number of Dominant Species
1, yes FACU That Are OBL, FACW, or FAG: 2 (A)
2.
Total Number of Dominant
3• Species Across All Strata. g (B)
4.
Percent of Dominant Species
5. That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 22 (A/B)
40
50% of total cover: 20
Sapling Stratum (Plot size: 15 )
1 Quercus rubra 20
2 Comus norida 5
3 Juniperus virginiana 2
4.
6. _
27
50% of total cover 13.5
Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15 1
1 Quercus pnnus 15
2 Carya tomentosa 5
= Total Cover
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
20% of total cover: 8
Total % Cover of:
Multiply by
OBL species 0
x 1 = 0
5
FACW species 0
x 2 = 0
yes FACU
FAC species 4
x 3 = 12
1 Vitis rotundifolia
yes FACU
FACU species 5
x 4 = 20
3• Lonicera japonica 5 yes FAC
no FACU
UPL species 2
X5=10
7•
g•
Column Totals: 11
(A) 42 (B)
10
Prevalence Index =
B/A = 3.8
= Total Cover H ophytic Vegetadon Indicators:
20% of total cover: 5.4 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
2 - Dominance Test is >50%
Ves UPL 3 - Prevalence Index is 53.0'
yes UPL 4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
❑ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
6
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
20 = Total Cover
Definitions of Five Vegetation Strata:
50% of total cover- 10 20% of total cover: 4
5
Tree — Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
Herb Stratum (Plot size
)
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and 3 in.
1 Vitis rotundifolia
10 yes FAC
(7.6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH).
Sapling — Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less
than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH.
Shrub — Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) in height.
Herb — All herbaceous (non- woody) plants, including
herbaceous vines, regardless of size, and woody
plants, except woody vines, less than approximately 3
ft (1 m) in height.
2 Vaccinium angustifolium 5 yes FACU
3• Lonicera japonica 5 yes FAC
4
5.
6
7•
g•
g
10
Woody vine — All woody vines, regardless of height.
11
20 = Total Cover
50% of total cover: 10 20% of total cover: 4
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size. 30 )
1 Vitis rotundifolia 5 ei s FAC
2 Lonicera japonica 2 no FAC
4.
5.
7 Hydrophytic
= Total Cover Vegetation ✓
50% of total cover: 3.5 20% of total cover: 1.4
Present? Yes No
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

SOIL Sampling Point: FDS -3
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the Indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix
Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) %
Color (moist) % Type' LocT
Texture Remarks
0 -2 10YR 3/2 100
SL
2 -14 7.5 YR 514 100
SL
'Type; C= Concentration D--Depletion, RM= Reduced Matrix MS= Masked Sand Grains.
Location: PL =Pore Lining, M= Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils':
_ Histosol (Al)
_ Dark Surface (S7)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2)
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147,148)
_ Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
_ Black Histic (A3)
_ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147,148)
(MLRA 147,148)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
_ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
_ Stratified Layers (A5)
_ Depleted Matrix (173)
(MLRA 136,147)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
_ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
_ Depleted Below Dark Surface (At 1)
_ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
_ Redox Depressions (F8)
_ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N,
_ Iron - Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 147,148)
MLRA 136)
_ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122)
'Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
_ Sandy Redox (S5)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (1719) (MLRA 148) wetland hydrology must be present.
_ Stripped Matrix (S6)
_ Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147) unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
✓
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
Project/Site: Boulevard Homes Connector Road City /County: Mecklenburg Sampling Date: 7/17/14
Applicant/Owner: Boulevard Phase 111, LLC State: NC Sampling Point: FDS4
InvesUgator(s): C. Farnsworth, J. Bohdan Section, Township, Range: N/A
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Hillslope Local relief (concave, convex, none): none Slope ( %): 4
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): P Lat: 35'12'46.81" N Long: 80 °55'16.59" W Datum:
Soil Map Unit Name: Wilkes loam NWI classification: UPL
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil . or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes ✓ No
Are Vegetation Soil , or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No— Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No v within a Wetland? Yes No X
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No.�
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary
Indicators {minimum of two reouirgdl
Surface Soil Cracks (B6)
Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
Pr i In t of one is II that appW
Surface Water (Al) True Aquatic Plants (1314)
High Water Table (A2)
Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
Drainage Patterns (810)
Saturation (A3)
Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
Moss Tnm Lines (13 16)
Water Marks (81)
Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
Dry- Season Water Table (C2)
Sediment Deposits (132)
Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
Crayfish Burrows (CB)
Drift Deposits (63)
Thin Muck Surface (C7)
Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
Algal Mat or Crust (134)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
Iron Deposits (85)
Geomorphic Position (D2)
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7)
Shallow Aquitard (D3)
Water- Stained Leaves (69)
Microtopographic Relief (D4)
Aquatic Fauna (613)
FAC- Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No
✓
Depth (inches): 0
Water Table Present? Yes No
Saturation Present? Yes No
✓
✓
Depth (inches): -14
Depth (inches): '14
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No ✓
includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks.
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Five Strata) — Use scientific names of plants. Sampling Point: FDS-4
(B)
25 = Total Cover H ophytic Vegefation indicators:
50% of total cover: 12.5 20% of total cover: 5 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15 ) 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
1. Cards canadensis 20 yes FACU 3 - Prevalence Index is s3.0'
2 Ligustrum vulgare 15 yes FACU 4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
3 ❑ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
5'
Absolute
Dominant Indicator
Dominance Test worksheet:
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30
)
Status
Number of Dominant Species
1 Quercus alba
15
yes FACU
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 6 (A)
Total Number of Dominant
2 Pinus taeda 15 e1! — FAC
Pinus vi niana
3. �
5
no LIPL
12
Species Across All Strata: (B)
Percent of Dominant Species
4 Liquidambar styraclflua 5 no FAC
x 3 = 24
5.
10 yes FACU
FACU species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 50 (A/B)
(B)
25 = Total Cover H ophytic Vegefation indicators:
50% of total cover: 12.5 20% of total cover: 5 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15 ) 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
1. Cards canadensis 20 yes FACU 3 - Prevalence Index is s3.0'
2 Ligustrum vulgare 15 yes FACU 4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
3 ❑ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
5'
40 = Total Cover
iCr41C11{C IIYCA wVMI lcca.
509'0 of total cover. 20
20% of total cover: 6
Total °!° Cover
of*
Multiply by:
1 = 0
0
Sapling Stratum (Plot size: 15 1
50% of total cover. 17 5
OBL species
FACW species
0
x
x 2 = 0
1. Carya glabra
10 yes FACU
FAC species
6
x 3 = 24
2 Ligustrum vulgare
10 yes FACU
FACU species
6
x 4= 24
3 Cards canadensis
5 yes FACU
UPL species
1
x5=5
6
7.
4.
Herb - All herbaceous (non- woody) plants, including
herbaceous vines, regardless of size, and woody
plants, except woody vines, less than approximately 3
Column Totals:
15
(A) 53
ft (1 m) in height.
5.
Woody vine -All woody vines, regardless of height.
11
it
Prevalence Index =
B/A = 3.5
(B)
25 = Total Cover H ophytic Vegefation indicators:
50% of total cover: 12.5 20% of total cover: 5 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15 ) 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
1. Cards canadensis 20 yes FACU 3 - Prevalence Index is s3.0'
2 Ligustrum vulgare 15 yes FACU 4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
3 ❑ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
5'
Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
6.
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
35 = Total Cover
Deflnitions of Five Vegetation Strata:
50% of total cover. 17 5
20% of total cover: 7
Tree - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
Herb Stratum (Plot size —5)
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and 3 in.
1 Lonicera japonica
10 ems FAC
(7 6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH).
Sapling - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less
than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH.
2 Parthenocissus quinquefolia 10 yes FAC
3 Toxicodendron radicans 2 no FAC
4
Shrub - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) in height.
5,
6
7.
Herb - All herbaceous (non- woody) plants, including
herbaceous vines, regardless of size, and woody
plants, except woody vines, less than approximately 3
6
9.
ft (1 m) in height.
10.
Woody vine -All woody vines, regardless of height.
11
22 = Total Cover
50% of total cover: 11 20% of total cover: 4.4
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30 )
1 Vitis rotundifolia 5 ems_ FAC
2 Lonicera japonica 2 yes FAC
3. Smilax rotundifolia 2 yes FAC
4.
5' Hydrophytic
9 = Total Cover Vegetation
50% of total cover. 4.5 20% of total cover: 1.6 Present? Yes No
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

1
1
t
1
1
1
SOIL Sampling Point: IDS-4
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of Indicators.)
Depth Matrix
Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) %
Color (moist) % Type' Loc Texture Remarks
0 -2 7.5YR 3/2 100
SL
2-4 7.5YR 4/3 100
SL
4 -14 7.5YR 5/4 100
SL
'Type: C- -Concentration D=De etion. RM= Reduced Matrix. MS= Masked Sand Grains. 21-ocation: PL =Pore Unin . M= Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils':
_ Histosol (Al)
_ Dark Surface (S7)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2)
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
_ Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
Black Histic (A3)
— Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
(MLRA 14T,148)
_
_ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
_ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
Stratified Layers (A5)
_ Depleted Matrix (F3)
(MLRA 136,147)
_
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
_ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
_ Depleted Below Dark Surface (Al 1)
_ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Thick Dark Surface (Al 2)
_ Redox Depressions (FB)
_ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N,
_ Iron - Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 147,148)
MLRA 136)
_ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136,122)
'Indicators of hydrophylic vegetation and
Sandy Redox (S5)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
wetland hydrology must be present,
_ Stripped Matrix (S6)
_ Red Parent Matenal (F21) (MLRA 127, 147)
unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches)
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No
Remarks
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

ENCLOSURE 8
FEMA FIRM MAP

Path: Y: \804 \34851- Boulevard Homes \GIS \Common Shared Exhibits\Blvd Homes FEMA Map.mxd
N
VJ� E
S
Project Limits -2.2 Acre
1% Future Conditions
Zone AE
Zone X
0 100 200 400
Feet
THIS DRAWING PREPARED AT THE
f♦ �WM
CORPORATE OFFICE
toot eomms -Sm Sao RI —% —',, A-1 T I M M O N S GROUP
TEL Ba1.Taa.650a FAX a01.580.iW6 www.ommon�.com
III f t t I T h I I Environmental
cited to construction, bidding, and /or construction staking without the express written consent of TIMMONS GROUP
Site
Development
Residentia n ras ruc ure so no ogy
==
DATE
REVISION DESCRIPTION
BOULEVARD HOMES
am
tiN
o
o
_
T
w
�� Gow Y.
n
z'
A z
a�
a D
O
TZ
e
om
+°
zm
�o
0Z
°m
m
A
FEMA FLOOD ZONE MAP
a
Those
clans
and ---ted documents are
the emluvve orooertv of TIMMONS GROUP and may not be reproduced
in whole or in part and
shall
not be
used for any
purpose
whatsoever,
inclusive, but not
cited to construction, bidding, and /or construction staking without the express written consent of TIMMONS GROUP

1. ENCLOSURE9
THREATENED AND ENDANGERED SPECIES LIST

United States Department of the Interior
FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE
�.....3�,m Asheville Ecological Services Field Office
160 ZILLICOA STREET
ASHEVILLE, NC 28801
PHONE: [phone] FAX: [phone]
URL: www.fws.gov /nc -es /es /countyfr.html
Consultation Tracking Number: 04EN1000- 2014 -SLI -0262
Project Name: Boulevard Homes
F Iti:H � UItLD LIFE
ERVICE
August 01, 2014
Subject: List of threatened and endangered species that may occur in your proposed project
location, and/or may be affected by your proposed project.
To Whom It May Concern:
The enclosed species list identifies threatened, endangered, proposed and candidate species, as
well as proposed and final designated critical habitat, that may occur within the boundary of
your proposed project and/or may be affected by your proposed project. The species list fulfills
the requirements of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service) under section 7(c) of the
Endangered Species Act (Act) of 1973, as amended (16 U.S.C. 1531 etseq.).
New information based on updated surveys, changes in the abundance and distribution of
species, changed habitat conditions, or other factors could change this list. Please feel free to
contact us if you need more current information or assistance regarding the potential impacts to
federally proposed, listed, and candidate species and federally designated and proposed critical
habitat. Please note that under 50 CFR 402.12(e) of the regulations implementing section 7 of
the Act, the accuracy of this species list should be verified after 90 days. This verification can
be completed formally or informally as desired. The Service recommends that verification be
completed by visiting the ECOS -IPaC website at regular intervals during project planning and
implementation for updates to species lists and information. An updated list may be requested
through the ECOS -IPaC system by completing the same process used to receive the enclosed
list.
The purpose of the Act is to provide a means whereby threatened and endangered species and
the ecosystems upon which they depend may be conserved. Under sections 7(a)(1) and 7(a)(2)
of the Act and its implementing regulations (50 CFR 402 et seq.), Federal agencies are required
to utilize their authorities to carry out programs for the conservation of threatened and
endangered species and to determine whether projects may affect threatened and endangered
species and/or designated critical habitat.
A Biological Assessment is required for construction projects (or other undertakings having

similar physical impacts) that are major Federal actions significantly affecting the quality of the
human environment as defined in the National Environmental Policy Act (42 U.S.C. 4332(2)
(c)). For projects other than major construction activities, the Service suggests that a biological
evaluation similar to a Biological Assessment be prepared to determine whether the project may
' affect listed or proposed species and/or designated or proposed critical habitat. Recommended
contents of a Biological Assessment are described at 50 CFR 402.12.
If a Federal agency determines, based on the Biological Assessment or biological evaluation,
that listed species and/or designated critical habitat may be affected by the proposed project, the
agency is required to consult with the Service pursuant to 50 CFR 402. In addition, the Service
recommends that candidate species, proposed species and proposed critical habitat be addressed
within the consultation. More information on the regulations and procedures for section 7
consultation, including the role of permit or license applicants, can be found in the "Endangered
Species Consultation Handbook" at:
http : / /www.fws.gov /endangered/esa - library/pdUTOC- GLOS.PDF
Please be aware that bald and golden eagles are protected under the Bald and G
Protection Act (16 U.S.C. 668 et seq.), and projects affecting these spec' y e ire
development of an eagle conservation plan
( http:// www. fws. gov /windenergy /eagle_guidance.hti o. A , w' ojects
should follow the wind energy guidelines (http: // s. o /wi d n ; minimizing
impacts to migratory birds and bats.
Guidance for minimizing i c4 ato ird r jects including communications
towers (e.g., cellular tat e i n, io, a ergency broadcast) can be found at:
h fti L �www.fyWA s -,g / i1i a o r u tBirdlssues/Hazards /towers /towers.htm;
.html.
Ae pprecia&4our concern for threatened and endangered species. The Service encourages
FdVAaI agencies to include conservation of threatened and endangered species into their project
planning to further the purposes of the Act. Please include the Consultation Tracking Number in
the header of this letter with any request for consultation or correspondence about your project
that you submit to our office.
Attachment

rar�eao Ems;
�, .�u%? _' United, States Department of Interior
rr Fish and Wildlife Service
Project name: Boulevard Homes
Preliminary Species list
Provided by:
Asheville Ecological Services Field Office
160 ZILLICOA STREET
ASHEVILLE, NC 28801
(828) 258 -3939
htip://www.fws.gov/nc-es/es/countyfr.htmi
Consultation Tracking Number: 04EN1000- 2014 -SLI -0262
Project Type: Transportation
Project Description: The Sites design consists of a two lane roadway, pedestrian sidewalks, and
the associated stormwater structures including curbs, drop inlets, and outfalls.
http. / /ecos.fws.gov /ipac, 08/01/2014 08:12 AM
1

vs.
United States Department of Interior
san:n
` Fish and Wildlife Service
A*
Project name: Boulevard Homes
Project Location Map:
Project Coordinates: MULTIPOLYGON (((- 80.9219045 35.2125386, - 80.9213573 35.2133543, -
80.9205526 35.2142308, - 80.9199518 35.2140818, - 80.9203166 35.2130212, - 80.9213144
35.2122761, - 80.9219045 35.2125386)))
Project Counties: Mecklenburg, NC
http: / /ecos.fws.gov /ipac, 08/01/2014 08:12 AM
2

�Q(VQML',,�it PGH= RftCELIFS
United States Department of Interior
Fish and Wildlife Service
Project name: Boulevard Homes
Endangered Species Act Species List
There are a total of 6 threatened,, endangered, or candidate species on your species list. Species on this list should be
considered in an effects analysislfor your project and could include species that exist in another geographic area. For
example, certain fish may appear on the species list because a project could affect downstream species. Critical habitats
listed under the Has Critical Habitat column may or may not lie within your project area. See the Critical habitats
within your project area section further below for critical habitat that lies within your project. Please contact the
designated FWS office if you have questions.
Clams
Status
Has Critical Habitat
Condition(s)
Carolina heelsplitter (Lasmigona
Endangered
Final designated
decorata)
i
Population: Entire
Flowering Plants
Georgia aster (Svmphyotrichum
Candidate
georgianum) . i
i
Michaux's sumac (Rhus michauxii)
Endangered
Schweinitz's sunflower (Helianthus
Endangered
schweinitzii)
Smooth coneflower (Echinaced
Endangered
laevigata)
Mammals
northern long -eared Bat (Myotis
Proposed
septentrionalis)
Endangered
http: / /ecos.fws.gov /ipac, 08/01/2014 08:12 AM
3

¢�ygNF �f j� ptJaA i, [GDIFa}
United States Department of Interior
Fish and Wildlife Service
Project name: Boulevard Homes
' Critical habitats that lie within your project area
There are no critical habitats within your project area.
http: / /ecos.fws.gov /ipac, 08/01/2014 08:12 AM
4

COUNTY_STAT
STATE_STAT
FEDERAL
us
STATU
S
sTATE_RANK
GLDGAL_RANK
HABITAT— COMMENT
COUNTY
Mecklenburg
us
Current
TAXONOMIC GROUP SCIENTIFIC
NAME
Co NAME
Carolina Birdfoo[ -trefoil SC
-V
FSC
53
G3
open woods over clay soils, roadsides
Poison Fork (Montgomery) (endemic to North Carolina, but perhaps extinct
Mecklenburg
g
Historical
Mecklenburg
Current
Vascular Plant
Acmispon helleri
SR
5X
GHQ
Long Creek (Mecklenburg'), Possibly in
Freshwater Bivalve
Alasmdonta robusta
Carolina Elktce
W1,W5
53B,51N
GS
pasrires and other grasslands [breeding season only)
Historical
Mecklenburg
Bent
Ammodramus savanna rum
Grasshopper Sparrow
E
S2
GO thm
soils around rock outcrops, usually on basic soil
Current
Mecklenburg
Vascular Plant
Anemone berlandnen
Southern Anemone
E
51
GS
clayey woodlands over mafic rocks
Mecklenburg
Current
Vascular Plant
Anemone camlmnana
Prairie Anemone
W2
53
GSTS
Wage streams, ponds, and lakes with sandy bottoms
Mecklenburg
Current
Reptile
Apalone spnnifera aspens
Gulf Coast Spiny Softshell
Wl
53
G4
op, clearings
en woodlands
Mecklenburg
Current
Vascular Plant
Baptma albescens
Thin -pod White Wild Indigo
5354
G3G4
Mecklenburg
Historical
Natural Community
Basic Mesic Forest (Piedmont Subtype)
W7
527
G465
bases of trees or on hard surfaces in swampy areas
Mecklenburg
Historical
Historical
Moss
Brachelyma subulatum
A Moss
W7
52�
G5
trees, humus, rocks in wet forests
Mecklenburg
Moss
Brachytheuum rutabulum
Rough - stalked Feather Moss
SH
G3G5
moist day or sandy soil in open areas
Mecklenburg
Current
Moss
Bruchna texana
Texas Moss
W7
52
GO
nch woods, cove forests, bottomlands
Mecklenburg
Historical
Vascular Plant
Grdamine dissects
Dissected Too[hwart
ted Too
SC -V
SR -p
52
Historical
G4
bogs and seeps
Mecklenburg
GS
piedmont bottomlands, coastal plain marl forests
Mecklenburg
t
Current
Current
Vascular Plant
Carex baileys -
Bailey's Sedge
W7
Sly
Vascular Plant
Carex granularis
Limestone Meadow Sedge
Si
G5
bogs, marshes, swamps, brownwater floodplain forests and opening!
Mecklenburg
Historical
Vascular Plant
Car" prolecta
Necklace Sedge
SR -p
52
GNR
Yadkin /Pee Dee, Catawba, and Broad drainages [native river /stream populations only, reservoir populations not tracked
Mecklenburg
Historical
Freshwater Fish
Carpiodes sp. cf cyprinus
a carpsucker
SR
SC
Current
SS
GNR
Catawba, Pee Dee, and Cape Fear rivers
Mecklenburg
Freshwater Fish
Carpiodes sp cf velifer
Highfin Carpsucker
Mecklenburg
Current
S3
GS
sandhills, sandy woods, and other dry woods
Reptile
Cemophora coccinea
Srarletsnake
Scarles
W S,WS
E
52
GS
forests and disturbed areas, mostly on basic Solis
Mecklenburg
Current
Vascular Plant
Grsnim rarolinianum
Carolina Thistle
moist meadows, bags, swamps, bottomlands [mountain population not of concern]
53
52
GS
G5T2Q
Mecklenburg
Mecklenburg
Historical
Historical
Animal Assemblage
Colonial Wading Bird Colony
Mole - Coastal Plain
Mammal
Condylum cristata pop 1
population
population
Autumn Coral -root
SC
Wl
547
GS
forests
cliffs or ledges for nesting, forests or fields (manly at high elevations) for foraging [breeding evidence only
Mecklenburg
Current
Vascular Plant
Corallomiza odontorhiza
W2
53
GS
forests elsewhere [NHP [racking only den /hibemacula sites and selected isolated populations]
Bird
Corvus coraz
Common Raven
Mecklenburg
Current
S3
G4
wetland forests in the Coastal Plain, rocky, upland
Mecklenburg
Current
Reptile
Crotalus horridus
Cyprinella zanema
Timber Rattlesnake
Sa Chub
ntee
SC
WS
E
FSC
53
52
G4
G3
Catawba and Broad drainages
grassy bads, glades, woodlands, mostly over mafic rock
Mecklenburg
Mecklenburg
Historical
Historical
Freshwater Fish
Vascular Plant
Delphinium exaltatum
Tall Larkspur
SC -H
SH
G5
open woodlands
Mecklenburg
Historical
GNR
dry sandy or rocky open woods and borders of thicket
Mecklenburg
Historical
Vascular Plant
Desmodium sessdifolium
Sessile Tick - trefoil
SR_F
Sl
GS
bases of trees, stumps, or on rocks in places submerged at high water
Mecklenburg
Historical
Vascular Plant
Dichanthelium annulum
Ringed Witch Grass
51�
Dichelyma capolaceum
Hair Claw Moss
SR -P
Current
G4
rich woods, either alluvial or over mafic or calcareous rock
Mecklenburg
Moss
Leatherwood
W l
53
Vascular Plant
Dina palustris
5253
G2G3
Mecklenburg
Current
Natural Community
Dry Basic Oak -- Hickory Forest
54
G4G5
Mecklenburg
Mecklenburg
Current
Natural Community
Dry Oak — Hickory Forest (Piedmont Subtype)
53
G3G4
G4G5
G5
swampy woods
Curren[
Natural Community
n--, Basic Oak — Hickory Forest (Piedmont Subtype)
54
Mecklenburg
Historical
Natural Community
Dry-Mesic Oak — Hickory Forest (Piedmont Subtype)
W7
52
Mecklenburg
Historical
Vascular Plant
Dryopteris carthusiana
Spinulose Woodfern
53
G5
bogs, wet woods
Mecklenburg
Curren[
Vascular Plant
Dryoptens cnstata
Crested WOOdfern
_WI
E
S1S2
G2G3
glades, woodlands, and open areas over mafic rock
Mecklenburg
Historical
Vascular Plant
Echinacea laewgata
Smooth ConeFlower
E
SR -D
51
G4
mafic glades and barrens
Mecklenburg
Current
Vascular Plant
Echmacea pallida
Pale Coneflower
SU
G3Q
Lake Wac[amaw, and perhaps elsewhere, very difficult to identify
Mecklenburg
Historical
Freshwater Bivalve
Elliptio producta
Atlantic Spike
W3,W5
W7
527
S1
G4G5
GS
moist or drying soil in disturbed, partly sunny areas, or on rotting wooc
open, wet areas
Mecklenburg
Historical
Moss
Ephemerum spinulosum
Emerald Dewdrops
W7
Mecklenburg
Current
Vascular Plant
Eragrostis lugens
Mourning Lovegass
SC
FSC
53
G3
streams in the Piedmont
Mecklenburg
Current
Freshwater Fish
E[heostoma Collis
Carolina Darter
W3
SR -7
S2
G5
woodlands, openings, and old fields over mafic rocks
Mecklenburg
Current
Vascular Plant
Eupatonum altissimum
Tall Baneset
Piedmont Aster
FSC
53
G3
nch slopes and bottomlands
for in winter) [nesting evidence, regular wintering sites
Mecklenburg
Current
Mecklenburg
Current
Vascular Plant
Eurybia muabilis
E
SiB,SZN
53B,S5N
G4
GS
cliffs (for nesting), coastal ponds and mudflats (for
open court"; nests in cavities [breeding evidence only]
Bird
Falco peregnnus
Peregrine Falcon
Mecklenburg
Historical
Bird
Falco sparvenus
American Kestrel
W1,W5
527
GS
attached to various substrata in stagnant and Flowing water, and in coastal estuaries
Mecklenburg
Hnsrincal
Moss
Fissidens fontanus
Fissidens scalans
Water Pocket Moss
A Plume Moss
W7
SR-0
SH
53
GNR
GS
bare, disturbed sod of stream banks and roadsides ,
nch bottomlands and slopes
Mecklenburg
Current
Moss
Mecklenburg
Current
Vascular Plant
Frangula carohniana
Carolina Buckthorn
Wl
SR
ewers
Mecklenburg
Current
rners
Current
Dragonfy or Damselfly
Gomphus abbreviatus
Spineaowned Clubtail
Blackwater Clubtail
W3
Mecklenburg
Mecklenburg
gng sites only
mature forests near large bodies of water (for nesungl. lakes and sounds (for fora i ) (nesting
Current
Dragonfly or Damselfly
Gomphus dilatatus
T
open woods, roadsides, and other rights-way
MedkJenbuB
Histonml
Bird
Hahaeets leucocephalus
Said Eagle
Vascular Plan[
Helianthus schweinitzu
Schweinitz's Sunflower
E
G5
on sod, humus, trees, or logs m swamps, marshes, or meadow"-
Mecklenburg
Historical
Moss
Helodium paludosum
Pond Fern Moss
W7
W7
MW
Mecklenburg
Current
nch, rocky woods
5
dry, or mesic woods on basic soils
Mecklenburg
Hrstodnal
Vascular Plan[
Heuchera carohniana
Carolina Alumrcot
SR-P
S
by streams or spnrgs in nch woods or clearings
Mecklenburg
Current
Vascular Plant
HexaleRris spiwta
Crested Coralmot
Vascular Plant
Hydrophyllum ranadense
Blunt -leaf Waterleaf
W6
W7
Mecklenburg
rren
47
wet sites, pooh
S
upland forests and woodlands
Vascular Plan[
Hypericum tubulosum
Marsh St John's -wort
Mecklenburg
Current
Vascular Plant
Ilex longoes
Georgia Holly
SR-0
W1 WS
53
Mecklenburg
Current
G5T5
Pule flatwoods, mesic pkne,tardwood forests
G4
fields and pastures @reeding season only]
Reptile
Lampropeltis elapsoides
Scarlet Kingsnake
S38,S3N
Loggerhead Shrike
W2,SC
Bud
Lanius ludowaanus

ENCLOSURE 10
HISTORICAL RESOURCE MAP AND SITES

rv1F:t ? ?�F Hauses
•
t
i
NS<2428 House (Gone)
MK 1383 F reemar. House (Gone)
i
MK 1397 Cathey House (Gone)
i
•
Boulevard Homes
a kll -,3188 Split Rail Looge 2008
r
` hM:30 ?1 Ford Motor Company Automotive Parts Distv"tion Center 2011 _
NIK.2983 W .PA Douglas Airport Hangar 1 _
- ■
3,
i
'.V a >t
Bt, d
Capitol
i # Drive Pi;,N<re;;
E-
MY �C
2189DouglasMunicipalAiport M K BURG * Rev
Ja[kso
Homos
Bouievard
Homes
KV1898 J. W. Auten House
i
Nil<1710 Robert McGinn House (Gone)
August 1, 2014
NR Individual Listing
A
SL and DOE entry
Both SL and Determined Eligible Boundary SLDOEHD Center Point
■ NR Listing, Gone
■
Study List Entry, Gone
AIL Determined Eligible
Q
Determined Eligible Boundary
* NRHD CenterPoint
A
SL and DOE. Gone
` DOE, Gone Both DOE and Study List Boundary
F-1 National Register Boundary
1r
SLHD Center Point
R. SL and DOE
Boundary of Destroyed /Removed NR Listing
SLDOEHD Center Point
♦ SL and DOE, Gone
— SL Individual Entry
Study List Boundary
_ DOEHD Center Point
Ponderosa
Wingate
i .
1:22,931
0 0.275 0.55 1.1 mi
0 0.45 0.9 1.8 km
Sources: Esri, HERE, Delonne, USGS, Intermap, increment P
Corp., NRCAN, Esri Japan, METI, Esri China (Hong Kong), Esri
(Thailand), TomTom, Mapmylndia, ® OpenStreetMap contributors,
and the GIs User Community
B. Snyder

� ENCLOSURE 11
AGENT AUTHORIZATION FORM
I '

AGENT AUTHORIZATION FORM
PROJECT NAME: Boulevard'Homes Offsite Road Improvements — Phase 3
PROPERTY LEGAL DESCRIPTION:
LOT NO. PLAN NO. PARCEL ID: #11505108
STREET ADDRESS: CPCC Harris Cam us Drive
Please print:
Property Owner: Mecklenburg County
Property Owner:
The undersigned,' registered property owners of the above noted property, do hereby authorize
Jason Bohdan , of Timmons Group
(Contractor/ Agent) (Name of consulting firm)
to act on my behalf and take all actions necessary for the processing, issuance and acceptance of
this permit or certification and any and all standard and special conditions attached.
Property Owner's Address (if different than property above):
3205 Freedom Drive Suite 101 Charlotte NC 28208
Telephone: [phone]
We hereby certify the above information submitted in this application is true and accurate to the
best of our knowledge.
Authorized Signature
Date: 4' Z 0 14
Authorized Signature
Date: