20140422 Ver 1_Mitigation Plans_20140812

/y 04Zz
To: Eric Kulz, NC DWR .._�
1617 MSC MW Raleigh, NC 27699 -1617 From: Heather Smith, Project Manager, EEP 2014
RE: Revised Hudson Mit Plan with PCN
Hudson
95361
Tar -Pam 03020104
Date: August 8, 2014
Here are the two final hardcopies of the revised mitigation plan and PCN for the Hudson_ project in
Beaufort County.

oa�F WATFgpG 41r,' 7 2014 Office use only:
Corps action ID no.
o Y ENHANCE.:'-6 P�FOARA DWQ project no.
Form Version 1.4 January 2009
Pre - Construction Notification (PCN) Form
A. Applicant Information
1. Processing
1 a. Type(s) of approval sought from the Corps:
❑X Section 404 Permit ❑ Section 10 Permit
1 b. Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number: 27 or General Permit (GP) number:
1c. Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps?
❑X Yes ❑ No
1 d. Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply):
❑X 401 Water Quality Certification — Regular ❑ Non -404 Jurisdictional General Permit
❑ 401 Water Quality Certification — Express ❑ Riparian Buffer Authorization
1 e. Is this notification solely for the record
because written approval is not required?
For the record only for DWQ
401 Certification:
❑X Yes ❑ No
For the record only for Corps Permit:
❑X Yes ❑ No
1f. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for
mitigation of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank
or in -lieu fee program.
❑ Yes ❑X No
1 g. Is the project located in any'of NC's twenty coastal counties. If yes, answer 1 h
below.
❑X Yes ❑ No
1 h. Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)?
❑ Yes ❑X No
2. Project Information
2a. Name of project:
Hudson Property
2b. County:
Beaufort
2c. Nearest municipality / town:
Chocowitny
2d. Subdivision name:
N/A
2e. NCDOT only, T.I.P. or state project no:
N/A -
3. Owner Information
3a. Name(s) on Recorded Deed:
Charles E. Hudson
3b. Deed Book and Page No.
Deed Book 1650, Page 0079
3c. Responsible Party (for LLC if
applicable):
Charles E. Hudson
3d. Street address:
2687 Haw Branch Road
3e. City, state, zip:
Chocowitny, NC 27817
3f. Telephone no.:
3g. Fax no.:
3h. Email address:
Page 1 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

4. Applicant Information (if different from owner)
4a. Applicant is:
❑ Agent X❑ Other, specify: Permittee
4b. Name:
Heather Smith
4c. Business name
(if applicable):
Ecosystem Enhancement Program
4d. Street address:
1652 Mail Service Center
4e. City, state, zip:
Raleigh, NC 27699 -1652
4f. Telephone no.:
919- 707 -8496
4g. Fax no.:
4h. Email address:
heather.c.smith @ncdenr.gov
5. Agent /Consultant Information (if applicable)
5a. Name:
Ed Temple
5b. Business name
(if applicable):
Albemarle Restorations, LLC
5c. Street address:
PO Box 176
5d. City, state, zip:
Fairfield, NC 27826
5e. Telephone no.:
252 - 333 -0249
5f. Fax no.:
5g. Email address:
edtemple @vol.com
Page 2 of 10

B.
Project Information and Prior Project History
1.
Property Identification
1a.
Property identification no. (tax PIN or parcel ID):
12024483
1 b.
Site coordinates (in decimal degrees):
I Latitude: 35.4522 Longitude: - 77.1063
1 c.
Property size:
13.49 acres
2.
Surface Waters
2a.
Name of nearest body of water to proposed project:
Unnamed Tributary to Horse Creek - Chocowitiny Creek
2b. Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water:
Perennial
2c.
River basin:
Tar- Pamlico
3.
Project Description
3a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this
application:
Existing crop field with surrounding crop fields, general landuse consists of forest, cropland, roads, and scattered residential.
3b.
List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property: 0
3c.
List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property: 3,085
3d. Explain the purpose of the proposed project:
To provide 2,981 stream mitigation units to EEP
3e. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
Grading, ripping, and excavation of approximately 3,000 linear feet of degraded intermittent streams in order to restore them to their natural planform.
4.
Jurisdictional Determinations
4a.
Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the
Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property /
project (including all prior phases) in the past?
0 Yes ❑ No ❑ Unknown
Comments:
4b.
If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination, what type
of determination was made?
0 Preliminary ❑ Final
4c.
If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas?
Name (if known): Kyle Barnes
Agency /Consultant Company: USACOE
Other:
4d. If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation.
August 11, 2011. See mitigation appendices for documentation.
5.
Project History
5a. Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for
this project (including all prior phases) in the past?
❑ Yes 0 No ❑ Unknown
5b.
If yes, explain in detail according to "help file" instructions.
6.
Future Project Plans
6a.
Is this a phased project?
❑ Yes ❑X No
6b.
If yes, explain.
Page 3 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

C. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
1 a. Which sections were completed below for your project (check all that apply):
❑ Wetlands ❑ Streams — tributaries ❑ Buffers ❑ Open Waters ❑ Pond Construction
2. Wetland Impacts
If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted.
2a.
Wetland impact
number
Permanent (P) or
Temporary T
2b.
Type of impact
2c.
Type of wetland
2d.
Forested
2e.
Type of jurisdiction
Corps (404,10) or
DWQ (401, other)
2f.
Area of
impact
(acres)
W1 T
Mitigation
Bottomland Hardwood Forest
Yes
Corps
0.97
W2
Choose one
Choose one
Yes /No
W3
Choose one
Choose one
Yes /No
W4 -
Choose one
Choose one
Yes /No
W5 -
Choose one
Choose one
Yes /No
W6
Choose one
Choose one
Yes /No
-
2g. Total Wetland Impacts:
2h. Comments:
While the wetlands are inside the LOD, the proposed stream mitigation grading will keep them at an elevation which will allow them to continue to
function.
3. Stream Impacts
If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this
question for all stream sites impacted.
3a.
Stream impact
number
Permanent (P) or
Temporary (T)
3b.
Type of impact
3c.
Stream name
3d.
Perennial (PER) or
intermittent (INT)?
3e.
Type of
jurisdiction
3f.
Average
stream
width
(feet)
3g.
Impact
length
(linear
feet)
S1 T
Mitigation
UN Trib to Horse Creek
INT
Corps
4
766
S2 T
Mitigation
UN Trib to Horse Creek
INT
Corps
4
516
S3 T
Mitigation
UN Trib to Horse Creek
INT
Corps
5
611
S4 T
Mitigation
UN Trib to Horse Creek
INT
Corps
7
503
S5 T
Mitigation
UN Trib to Horse Creek
INT
Corps
9
689
S6
Choose one
-
3h. Total stream and tributary impacts
3i. Comments:
All impacts are temporary. The existing straightened streams will be returned to their natural planforms.
Page 4 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

4. Open Water Impacts
If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of
the U.S. then indivii ually list all open water impacts below.
4a.
Open water
impact number
Permanent (P) or
Temporary T
4b.
Name of waterbody
(if applicable)
4c.
Type of impact
4d.
Waterbody
type
4e.
Area of impact (acres)
01
Choose one
Choose
02 -
Choose one
Choose
03
Choose one
Choose
04
Choose one
Choose
4f. Total open water impacts
4g. Comments:
5. Pond or Lake Construction
If pond or lake construction proposed, the complete the chart below.
5a.
Pond ID number
5b.
Proposed use or
purpose of pond
5c.
Wetland Impacts (acres)
5d.
Stream Impacts (feet)
5e.
Upland
(acres)
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
P1
Choose one
P2
Choose one
5f. Total:
5g. Comments:
5h. Is a dam high hazard permit required?
❑ Yes ❑ No If yes, permit ID no:
5i. Expected pond surface area (acres):
5j. Size of pond watershed (acres):
5k. Method of construction:
6. Buffer Impacts (for DWQ)
If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below. If yes, then individually list all buffer impacts
below. If any impacts require mitigation, then you MUST fill out Section D of this form.
6a. Project is in which protected basin?
❑ Neuse ❑X Tar - Pamlico ❑ Catawba ❑ Randleman ❑ Other:
6b.
Buffer Impact
number —
Permanent (P) or
Temporary T
6c.
Reason for impact
6d.
Stream name
6e.
Buffer
mitigation
required?
6f.
Zone 1
impact
(square
feet )
6g.
Zone 2
impact
(square
feet
B1 -
Yes /No
B2 -
Yes /No
B3 -
Yes /No
B4 -
Yes /No
B5 -
Yes /No
B6 -
Yes /No
6h. Total Buffer Impacts:
6i. Comments:
Page 5 of 10

D. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
1a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project.
N/A
1 b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques.
N/A
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for
impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State?
❑ Yes ❑X No
2b. If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply):
❑ DWQ ❑ Corps
2c. If yes, which mitigation option will be used for this
project?
❑ Mitigation bank
❑ Payment to in -lieu fee program
❑ Permittee Responsible Mitigation
3. Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank
3a. Name of Mitigation Bank:
3b. Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter)
Type: Choose one
Type: Choose one
Type: Choose one
Quantity:
Quantity:
Quantity:
3c. Comments:
4. Complete if Making a Payment to In -lieu Fee Program
4a. Approval letter from in -lieu fee program is attached.
❑ Yes
4b. Stream mitigation requested:
linear feet
4c. If using stream mitigation, stream temperature:
Choose one
4d. Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only):
square feet
4e. Riparian wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4f. Non - riparian wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4g. Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4h. Comments:
5. Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
5a. If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan.
Page 6 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

6. Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) — required by DWQ
6a. Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires
buffer mitigation?
❑ Yes ❑X No
6b. If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation. Calculate the
amount of mitigation required.
Zone
6c.
Reason for impact
6d.
Total impact
(square feet)
Multiplier
6e.
Required mitigation
(square feet)
Zone 1
3 (2 for Catawba)
Zone 2
1.5
6f. Total buffer mitigation required:
6g. If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e.g., payment to private mitigation bank,
permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in -lieu fee fund).
6h. Comments:
Page 7 of 10

E.
Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ)
1.
Diffuse Flow Plan
1 a. Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified
❑ Yes ❑ No
within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
1 b.
If yes, then is a diffuse flow plan included? If no, explain why.
❑ Yes ❑ No
2.
Stormwater Management Plan
2a.
What is the overall percent imperviousness of this project?
2%
2b.
Does this project require a Stormwater Management Plan?
❑ Yes ❑X No
2c.
If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why:
2d.
If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan, then provide a brief, narrative description of the plan:
2e.
Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan?
3.
Certified Local Government Stormwater Review
3a.
In which local government's jurisdiction is this project?
❑ Phase II
❑ NSW
3b.
Which of the following locally - implemented stormwater management programs
❑ USMP
apply (check all that apply):
❑ Water Supply Watershed
❑ Other:
3c.
Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
❑ Yes ❑ No
attached?
4.
DWQ Stormwater Program Review
❑Coastal counties
❑HQW
4a.
Which of the following state - implemented stormwater management programs apply
❑ORW
(check all that apply):
❑Session Law 2006 -246
❑Other:
4b.
Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
❑ Yes ❑ No
attached?
5.
DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review
5a.
Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements?
❑ Yes ❑ No
5b.
Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met?
❑ Yes ❑ No
Page 8 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

F.
Supplementary Information
1.
Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement)
1 a.
Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal /state /local) funds or the
Yes ❑ No
use of public (federal /state) land?
1b.
If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an
environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State
❑X Yes ❑ No
(North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA /SEPA)?
1c.
If you answered "yes" to the above, has the document review been finalized by the
State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval
Yes ❑ No
letter.)
Comments:
2.
Violations (DWQ Requirement)
2a. Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated
Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards,
❑ Yes ❑X No
or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 213 .0200)?
2b.
Is this an after - the -fact permit application?
❑ Yes ❑X No
2c.
If you answered "yes" to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s):
3.
Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement)
3a.
Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in
❑ Yes ❑X No
additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?
3b.
If you answered "yes" to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the
most recent DWQ policy. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
4.
Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement)
4a.
Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non- discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from
the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
Page 9 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or
habitat?
❑ Yes ❑X No
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act
impacts?
E9 Yes ❑ No
5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted.
Raleigh
5d. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical
Habitat?
USFWS service provided online data
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat?
❑ Yes ❑X No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat?
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal
governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation
status (e.g., National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in
North Carolina history and archaeology)?
❑ Yes ❑X No
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA- designated 100 -year floodplain?
❑ Yes ❑X No
8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements:
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination?
FEMA Mapping
Applicant/Agent's Printed Name
Date
Applicant/Agent's Signature
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization
letter from the applicant is provided.)
Page 10 of 10

• Albemarle Restorations, LLC
Wetland Restoration
Stream Restoration
Wildlife Habitat
August 1, 2014
Heather Smith, Project Manager
Ecosystem Enhancement Program
NC Department of Environment and Natural Resources
1652 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699 -1652
RE: Hudson Property Mitigation Plan Comments
Contract # 004638
EEP IMS # 95361
Ms. Smith,
For your review, please see your plan comments for the above mentioned project from the letter dated
July 25, 2014 followed by our responses in italics. Please also find attached a total of five (5) hard copies
and one (1) cd of the completed PCN form and the Mitigation plan proper.
Feel free to contact me with any questions.
• Thank you,
Ed Temple
0
7 2014
SrEIV,

Hudson Property Mitigation Plan Comments
• Contract # 004638, EEP IMS # 95361
Point -by -Point Response
August 1, 2014
POINT -BY -POINT RESPONSE:
Todd Bowers (EPA)
• Update NCDWQ to reflect change to NCDWR with the exception of citations.
Update has been made in Section 4 — Baseline Information.
• Exhibits C -K do not denote the Reaches 1 -5 on the map. No diagram of the Reaches was illustrated
until the appendices. Recommend mapping these within the main body of the MP for clarity.
Exhibits C, D, H, and K (immediately following the mitigation report) were revised to denote Reaches
1 -5.
• Executive Summary (page 3): Project size is listed as 13.4 acres. This matches the rest of the
document with the exception of page 126 that lists the project size as 12.6 acres
Final project size is 13.49 acres which has been updated throughout the document including FEMA
checklist info on page 126.
• • Unclear on how many SMUs are to be generated. Most of the document states 2,700 SMUs but
several tables refer to 2,891 if of restored reaches.
The project is providing EEP the mitigation they need which is 2,700 SMUs (as stated in the contract
with Albemarle Restorations, LLC) however the project is delivering 2,981 SMUs.
• Where on the site is there a third order tributary? Only assumption made is that one of the upper
reaches (Reach 1) is a second order stream by the time it enters the site. This would make the
confluence with Reaches 2 -4 third order however there is no discussion to support this assumption.
There are I" and 2nd order streams on this project and the revision has been made.
• Project Goals: There is no goal pertaining to the reestablishment of aquatic fauna such as benthic
macroinvertebrates, amphibians, crayfish etc. I'm not suggesting that we put this under the auspices of
performance standards (yet) but we need to start including biologics as a specific goal of these types
of projects in order to carry out the Clean Water Act's purpose of maintaining the physical, chemical
and biological integrity of waters of the United States. It would be a shame if all this habitat
constructed was just to look pretty and nothing was living in it. We should begin to verify that indeed
habitat is being utilized for the purpose intended and if we are to state that improving ecological
function is a goal then we need to know the fauna side of the ecology is present (or not) in order to
verify bona -fide ecological improvement. The biology scores from the NC DWQ Stream ID form are
rather low (as expected for agriculture ditches) and I would like to see an improvement noted in
future stream assessments following the restoration.
• Comment noted.
Page 2 of 7

Hudson Property Mitigation Plan Comments
•
Contract # 004638, EEP 1MS # 95361
Point -by -Point Response
August 1, 2014
• Page 9: Need a citation for the NC DWQ Stream ID Forms Version 4.11
The citation has been added.
• Page 11: Using the same NCDWQ Stream ID score for all five Reaches is inappropriate especially
with reaches that have a wide difference in watershed sizes
NCDWQ Stream ID scores have 'been revised and are provided in Appendix B.
• Page 12: Stream Mitigation Credits in Table 3 is listed at 2,904 which neither matches 2,700 SMUs
or 2,891 If of streams restored.
The project is providing EEP the mitigation they need which is 2,700 SMUs (as stated in the contract
with Albemarle Restorations, LLQ however the project is delivering 2,981 SMUs. I Revisions have
been made to provide clarification.
• Page 12: Restoration Approach in Table 3 does not match Priorities listed on page 126, which lists all
at Priority 1. Reach 1 appears to be P 1 but Reaches 2 -4 appear to be PIII based on the provided plans
(no lift, no shift, floodplain lowered to meet stream).
Reach I has proposed alterations to dimension, pattern, and profile therefore qualifying as Priority
1. Reaches 2 -4 contain areas of both Priority 1 and 2. Reach S is Priority 2. These revisions have
been incorporated into the mitigation report and plan.
Page 14, 6.2: Only 10% of a site's total stream credits should be withheld until two bankfull events in
separate years has occurred. Table 4 on the previous page has this approach correct.
Revision has been made to 10% in Section 6.2.
Page 14, 7.1: Restoration of Reaches 2 -4 description seems to be that of a PIII and not a P1 /II
approach
Alterations to dimension, pattern, and profile are proposed for Reaches 1 -4 therefore qualifying for
Priority 1 and 2.
• Page 14: Was any plant community data recorded for the reference reach and if so, is that data being
utilized to develop a planting guide?
The reference reach for stream morphology is at Merchant's Millpond State Park. The plant
community used as a reference for species selection is the area at the project site that is not included
in the ownership but will connect to our project at both its upstream and downstream sides. The most
commonly occuring species found there include: L. tulipifera, Q. alba, L. styraciflua, A.' rubrum, Q.
nigra, Q. phellos, P. taeda and P. occidentalis. The planting list has been revised to more closely
• resemble the species found there.
Page 3 of 7

Hudson Property Mitigation Plan Comments
• Contract # 004638, EEP IMS # 95361
Point -by -Point Response
August 1, 2014
• Page 15: Where are the reference areas used to select vegetation
See previous comment above.
• Page 15: Citation for "Dominant Plants for Major Wetland Types" is needed.
Citation has been added.
• Page 15, 7.2: All other discussions for channel design only refer to C type and not Bc. Is the reference
to Bc only for those locations where slope may exceed 2 %?
Reaches 1 -4 will be low sinuosity C5-C6 stream types with downstream portions of Reaches 1 and 4
qualifying as Cb stream type because of increase in slope ( >2 %). Revisions have been made to reflect
this information.
• Page 15: No mention of plant community or benthic macroinvertebrates for Reference Reach. Was a
NCDWQ Stream ID form used on the reference reach?
A NCDWQ Form was used on the reference reach and is provided in Appendix B along with the
•D WQformsfor the project reaches.
• Page 16, 7.2: discussion centers around the C5 -C6 channel design. Higher slope in some reaches is
discussed but B channel type is not mentioned.
Reaches 1 -4 will be low sinuosity C5 -C6 stream types with downstream portions of Reaches I and 4
qualifying as Cb stream type because of increase in slope ( >2 %). Revisions have been made to reflect
this information.
• Page 19: Table 6 may want to mention beavers as this is a very real possibility (anticipated activity)
for needed repairs.
Other potential issues including animal damage, disease or pest infestation, or damage from extreme
weather events will be noted during monitoring, with any apparent problem areas mapped for
inclusion into the monitoring report. The monitoring will also include any corrective actions taken or
proposed.
Page 19, 9.1.1: "Surface water flow must be documented to occur at least 2 times per year for 4 years
out of the 7 -year monitoring period ". This seems like a strange metric for a 3rd Order perennial
stream. Please explain rationale for this particular performance standard.
As mentioned before, P and 2 d order streams are present for this project, not 3`1 order.
• Page 20, 9.2.1: Please define "accelerated" in terms of erosion.
"Accelerated" erosion can include evidence of bank sloughing and actively eroding banks due to the
exceedance in critical bank height and lack of deep rooted stream bank vegetation.
Page 4 of 7

Hudson Property Mitigation Plan Comments
• Contract # 004638, EEP IMS # 95361
Point -by -Point Response
August 1, 2014
• Page 21, Table 7: Cite the version of the CVS Protocol you are using. (2008 ?). I am aware that the
1998 Peet et. al. paper on the method is being used but it was not cited either.
Version 4.2 2008 CVS Protocol will be used and the revisions have been made.
• Page 22, 10.4: Please define "excessive" in terms of scour or erosion.
Similar to "accelerated", "excessive" can be interpreted to be more than the natural amount of
erosion.
• Page 24, 10.7: Cite the version of CVS Protocol being used.
Version 4.2 2008 CVS Protocol will be used and the revisions have been made.
• Page 26, 14.2: References need to be alphabetized and cross checked for use within the document.
References have been alphabetized and cross checked.
• • Page 76: As noted before, using the same NCDWQ Stream ID score for all five Reaches is
inappropriate especially with reaches that have a wide difference in watershed sizes.
NCDWQ Stream ID scores have been revised and are provided in Appendix B.
• Page 126: 12.6 acres of land for the project may be erroneous (13.4 acres listed in much of the rest of
the document) see previous comment.
Final project size is 13.49 acres which has been updated throughout the document including FEMA
checklist info on page 126 '
• Page 126: Clarify which priority restoration type is being used for each reach. There is some
inconsistency with the rest of the document. See previous comment.
Clarification has been made.
• Page 177: Recommend limiting sweetgum and red maple components of the planting plan to a
combined maximum of 15 %. A 27% planting rate for known aggressive volunteer species seems
excessive.
Planting schedule has been revised and no longer contains either Sweet Gum or Red Maple (see
mitigation plan for revised planting schedule).
Eric Kulz (DWR)
• • Based on a field visit and USDA soil mapping, it appears unlikely that all of the features proposed for
restoration were streams, as no alluvial soils are present on site. All features on the site appear to
Page 5 of 7

Hudson Property Mitigation Plan Comments
• Contract # 004638, EEP IMS # 95361
Point -by -Point Response
August 1, 2014
have been excavated to groundwater. While reaches 2/4 and 5 may have been a stream, it is likely
that reaches 1 and 3 were ephemeral swales. Site soils along all proposed restoration features are
•
Craven fine sandy loam, which is described as "gently sloping, well- drained soils on ridges in
uplands ". The only soils exhibiting hydric characteristics on the site are within the excavated
channels. In addition, the watershed size for reach 3 (26 acres) is extremely small to support a
stream.
Historical aerial photos, specifically the 1938 aerial photograph of the site clearly shows defined
channels within all reaches proposed for restoration. Reach 3 show wooded fingers branching out to
the southwest and southeast above the reach proposed for restoration. The 1938 aerial also shows
Reach 1 with a clearly defined meander pattern and commensurate amplitude consistent with a single
thread natural channel. Reach 2 shows a minimum of four first order channels branching out east,
southeast, and east upslope of the reach proposed for restoration. All reaches will be monitored
with continuous recording gauges upstream and downstream of each reach to document continuous
flow. Finally, the flood study performed for the project refined the drainage area calculations to
approximately 35 acres. Delineating a precise drainage area remains a challenge for these type of
projects due the general lack of defined topography and the manipulation of drainage patterns for
agricultural purposes.
Scott McGill of Albemarle Restorations /Ecotone had a discussion with Eric Kulz regarding the
drainage areas and his comment above. A similar responselexplanation to what is given here was
discussed with Eric and he stated he was content and approved to move forward.
• Should this project go forward as proposed, DWR will require groundwater monitoring wells
installed in the thalweg near the top and bottom of reaches 1, 2 and 3. The wells shall be equipped
with continuous — reading gauges capable of documenting sustained flow for at least 30 days during
years with normal rainfall (demonstrating at least intermittent stream status).
Stream flow monitoring will include groundwater monitoring gauges capable of recording water
level data for extended periods of time. These gauges will be deployed in the thalweg at numerous
locations as outlined in section 10.2, item 2 and 10.3, item 2 which indicate a minimum of three
gauges be deployed in each reach, at the top, middle and bottom. Additional monitoring will include
video recording offlow when it occurs. The success criteria.for stream hydrology is stated in Section
9.1.2, two over bank events in separate years throughout the monitoring period. This is the success
criteria intended to be used for this project due to these channels being designed as single thread
channels (reaches 1 -4).
• In addition, All features on -site must be evaluated by DWR Washington Regional Office personnel
for applicability of the Neuse Riparian Buffer Rules in order to generates riparian buffer credit
We are not generating riparian buffer credit for the project, only stream mitigation units.
Page 6 of 7

•
Hudson Property Mitigation Plan Comments
Contract # 004638, EEP IMS # 95361
Point -by -Point Response
August 1, 2014
Review of the proposed planting list revealed that sweetgum and red maple are the two species to be
planted in greatest numbers. It has been our observation that these species volunteer prolifically and
based on research conducted by DWR on older mitigation sites, they will become major canopy
species over time through natural processes. Planting of these species will result in the site becoming
dominated with red maple and sweetgum by the end of the monitoring period. Please remove these
species from the planting list
Planting schedule has' been revised and no longer contains either Sweet Gum or Red Maple (see
mitigation plan for revised planting schedule).
Todd Tnwell, USACE
Section 10.7 Vegetation Planting Monitoring Requirements, Page 18, states that vegetation
monitoring plots shall make up a minimum of 1% of the planted portion of the site with a minimum
of 4 plots. The EEP standard per the November 7, 2011 document Monitoring Requirements and
Performance Standards for Stream and /or Wetland Mitigation is 2% of the planted portion of the site.
Please check the applicable EEP monitoring requirements to ensure you are including the correct
standard.
Per the Monitoring Requirements and Performance Standards for Stream and /or Wetland Mitigation
document, the previous text noting the minimum 1% of planted vegetation to be monitored has been
changed to 2%
Page 7 of 7

•
•
MITIGATION PLAN
Hudson Property
Beaufort County, North Carolina
EEP Project #: 95361
Contract #: 004638
USACE Action ID: SAW- 2012 -01394
Tar - Pamlico River Basin
CU: 03020104 / TLW: 03020104010010
Prepared for:
'N•^
Am Tri o stem
�t
PROGRAM
NC Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Ecosystem Enhancement Program
1652 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699 -1652
Revised July, 2014
NCEEP Mitigation Template version 2.2 — 0610812012

0
MITIGATION PLAN
Hudson Property
Beaufort County, North Carolina
EEP Project #: 95361
Contract #: 004638
USACE Action ID: SAW- 2012 -01394
Tar - Pamlico River Basin
CU: 03020104 / TLW: 03020104010010
Prepared for:
•
Prepared by:
Albemarle Restorations, LLC
P.O. Box 176 — Fairfield, NC 27826
p (252) 333 -0249 f (252) 926 -9983
NCEEP Mitigation Template version 2.2 — 0610812012

•
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
This mitigation plan has been written in conformance with the requirements of the following:
• Federal rule for compensatory mitigation project sites as described in the Federal Register
Title 33 Navigation and Navigable Waters Volume 3 Chapter 2 Section § 332.8
paragraphs (c)(2) through (c)(14).
• NCDENR Ecosystem Enhancement Program In -Lieu Fee Instrument signed and dated July
28, 2010
These documents govern NCEEP operations and procedures for the delivery of compensatory mitigation.
The North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources Ecosystem Enhancement
Program has selected 13.49 acres of land positioned in the Tar - Pamlico river basin cataloging unit
03020104, for stream restoration to fulfill a portion of the Request for Proposals (RFP): Full Delivery
Project Tar - Pamlico River Basin, RFP 16- 004106. The RFP and subsequent contract(s) awarded by EEP
provide compensatory stream, wetland and /or buffer mitigation within the Tar - Pamlico River Basin
Cataloging Unit 03020104. Albemarle Restorations, LLC entered into a contract with the State of North
Carolina on June 12, 2012 to deliver 2,700 stream mitigation units (SMUs) on the Hudson project site.
An option to purchase a conservation easement has been signed and recorded on the 13.49 acres
• encompassing this project on July 26, 2011 at the Beaufort County Tax Office and Register of Deeds
(Appendix A).
r�
LJ
Albemarle Restorations, LLC proposes to restore 2,981 linear feet of stream (2,981 SMUs for the
required 2,700 SMUs per EEP's contract) on the Hudson Property, located within the northeast quadrant
of the intersection between Route 17 and Route 1127 (Possum Track Road) in Beaufort County, North
Carolina. The project is comprised of 13.49 acres of agricultural land situated approximately 6 miles
southeast of the Chocowinity Bay and Pamlico River confluence and 4.4 miles north of the Beaufort and
Craven County line.
The site contains unnamed 15Y and 2nd order tributaries that drain to Horse Branch which is located
within the Chocowinity Creek watershed (USGS Cataloging Unit 03020104010010). The Chocowinity
Creek watershed has been added as a TLW for the Tar - Pamlico River Basin according to the "Tar- Pamlico
River Basin Restoration Priorities" draft document by NCEEP (dated: October, 2010). Historic aerial
photographs show evidence of the natural headwater streams that were cleared and channelized for
agriculture production.
Page 3 of 27 NCEEP Mitigation Template version 2.2 — 0610812012

TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page 4 of 27 NCEEP Mitigation Template version 2.2 — 0610812012
1. RESTORATION PROJECT GOALS AND OBJECTIVES ..................................................... ............................... 7
2. SITE SELECTION ........................................................................................................... ..............................8
2.1 Directions to Site ......................................................... :.......................................................................
8
2.2 Site Selection ........................................................................................................ ...............................
8
3. SITE PROTECTION INSTRUMENT ................................................................................ ...............................
9
3.1 Site Protection Instrument Summary Information ............................................... ..............................9
3.2 Site Protection Instrument Figure ........................................................................ .............................10
4. BASELINE INFORMATION ......................................................................................... ...............................
11
4.1 Project Watershed Summary Information ......................................................... ...............................
11
4.2 Reach Summary Information ............................................................................. ...............................
11
4.3 Regulatory Considerations .....................:............................................................. .............................11
5. DETERMINATION OF CREDITS .................................................................................. ...............................
12
6. CREDIT RELEASE SCHEDULE ..................................................................................... ...............................
13
•
6.1 Initial Allocation of Released Credits ................................................................... .............................13
6.2 Subsequent Credit Releases ................................................................................. .............................14
7. MITIGATION WORK PLAN ........................................................................................ ...............................
14
7.1 Target Stream Type(s) and Plant Communities ................................................... .............................14
7.2 Design Methodology ............................................................................................ .............................15
7.3 Reference Reach ................................................................................................ ...............................
15
7.4 Design Parameters ............................................................................................. ...............................
16
7.5 Narrative of Data Analysis .................................................................................. ...............................
18
7.5.1 Hydrology .......................................................................................................... .............................18
7.5.2 Hydraulics .......................................................................................................... .............................18
8. MAINTENANCE PLAN ............................................................................................... ...............................
18
9. PERFORMANCE STANDARDS .................................................................................... ...............................
19
9.1 Stream Restoration Hydrology Performance Standards ...................................... .............................19
9.1.1 Headwater System (Reach 5) ............................................................................ .............................19
9.1.2 Single Thread Channels (Reaches 1- 4) ............................................................ .............................19
9.2 Stream Channel Restoration Stability Performance Standards ......................... ...............................
20
•
9.2.1 Headwater System (Reach 5) .......................................................................... ...............................
20
9.2.2 Single Thread Channels (Reaches 1- 4) .......................................................... ...............................
20
Page 4 of 27 NCEEP Mitigation Template version 2.2 — 0610812012

•
•
9.3 Planted Vegetation Performance Standards (Stream Buffer Areas) ................. ............................... 20
10. MONITORING REQUIREMENTS ................................................................................ .............................20
10.1 General Stream and Wetland Monitoring Requirements .................................. .............................21
10.2 Stream Channel Surface Water Hydrology Monitoring Requirements (Reach 5) .......................... 22
10.3 Stream Surface Water Hydrology Monitoring Requirements (Reaches 1- 4) .. .............................22
10.4. Stream Channel Stability Monitoring Requirements (Reach 5) ........................ .............................22
10.5 Stream Channel Stability Monitoring Requirements (Reaches 1 — 4) .............. ............................... 22
10.6 Visual Monitoring Requirements for Single Thread Streams (Reaches 1 - 4) .. ............................... 23
10.7 Vegetation Planting Monitoring Requirements ............................................... ............................... 24
11. LONG -TERM MANAGEMENT PLAN ........................................................................ ............................... 24
12. ADAPTIVE MANAGEMENT PLAN ............................................................................ ............................... 25
13. FINANCIAL ASSURANCES ........................................................................................ ............................... 25
14. OTHER INFORMATION ........................................................................................... ............................... 25
14.1 Definitions .......................................................................................................... .............................25
14.2 References ....................................................................................................... ............................... 26
EXHIBITS
Exhibit A —Vicinity Map
Exhibit B — Project Site Watershed
Exhibit C— NRCS Soil Survey
Exhibit D — Existing Conditions
Exhibit E — Historical Aerial Photograph 1938
Exhibit F — Historical Aerial Photograph 1963
Exhibit G — Historical Aerial Photograph 1979
Exhibit H — Project Drainage Area
Exhibit I — Site Photographs
Exhibit J — Reference Reach Vicinity Map
Exhibit K - Site Protection Instrument Figure
APPENDICES
AppendixA —Site Protection Instrument
• Appendix B — Baseline Information Data
Page 5 of 27 NCEEP Mitigation Template version 2.2 — 0610812012

•
•
Appendix C — Mitigation Work Plan Data and Analyses
Appendix D — Project Plan Sheets at 11" x 17"
Appendix E — Reference Reach Photographs
Appendix F — Floodplain Study
TABLES
Table 1. Parcel information for protect site .............................................................. ............................... 3
Table 2. Project information summary ...................................................................... ............................... 5
Table 3. Proposed mitigation credit proiections ....................................................... ............................... 6
Table 4. Proposed credit release schedule ............................................................... ............................... 7
Table 5. Reach Design Discharges ........................................................................... ............................... 12
Table 6. Anticipated Maintenance Activities .......................................................... ............................... 13
Table 7. Monitoring data requirements .................................................................. ............................... 15
Page 6 of 27
NCEEP Mitigation Template version 2.2 — 0610812012

•
1. RESTORATION PROJECT GOALS AND OBJECTIVES
EEP develops River Basin Restoration Priorities to guide its restoration activities within each of the
state's 54 cataloging units. RBRPs delineate specific watersheds that exhibit both the need and
opportunity for wetland, stream and riparian buffer restoration. These watersheds are called Targeted
Local Watersheds (TLWs) and receive priority for EEP planning and restoration project funds.
The 2010 Tar - Pamlico River Basin Restoration Priorities identified the Chocowinity Creek Watershed
(HUC: 03020104010010) as a Targeted Local Watershed (Tar - Pamlico River Basin Restoration Priorities,
Oct 2010). The watershed is characterized by 41% agricultural and 53% forested area with 59% of the
TLW 'unbuffered and receiving excess agricultural inputs (sediments and nutrients) from various facilities
such as four (4) permitted hog farms.
The 2010 Tar - Pamlico River Basin RBRP identified discontinuity of resource lands to Natural Heritage
Areas and nutrient and sediment loading as major stressors within this TLW. The Hudson Property
Project was identified as a headwater stream and buffer restoration opportunity to improve water
quality, terrestrial wildlife and anadromous fish habitat, especially downstream nursery and spawning
habitats within the TLW. The primary objectives of this project are to restore naturally functioning
headwater stream system across a newly forested floodplain in the lower reaches of the project area,
and to restore stable single thread channels in the upper reaches where valley slopes are steeper.
• The project goals address stressors identified in the TLW and include the following:
Goals outlined by the EEP in the "Tar- Pamlico River Basin Restoration Priorities ":
• Promoting nutrient and sediment reduction in agricultural areas by restoring and preserving
wetlands, streams and riparian buffers.
• Continuing targeted implementation of projects under the Nutrient Offset and Buffer programs,
as well as focusing DOT sponsored restoration in areas where they will provide the most
functional improvement to the ecosystem.
Goals specific to the Chocowinity Creek TLW:
• Implementing agricultural Best Management Practices (BMPs) to reduce nonpoint source inputs
to the downstream estuary.
• Restore /improve downstream nursery ad spawning habitats for anadromous fish.
• Restore wildlife habitat and travel corridors between natural habitats.
• Restore natural floodplain hydrology and provide flood attenuation.
• Restore groundwater and surface water hydrology in heavily ditched headwater areas.
Proiect Specific Goals:
• Improve and sustain hydrologic connectivity /interaction and storm flow /flood attenuation.
• Reduce nutrient and sediment stressors to the reach and receiving watershed.
• Provide uplift in water quality functions.
• Improve aquatic and terrestrial habitats (complexity, quality).
• Improve and maintain riparian buffer habitat.
Page 7 of 27 NCEEP Mitigation Template version 2.2 — 0610812012

•
The project goals will be addressed through the following project objectives:
• Implement a sustainable, reference - based, rehabilitation of the reach dimension, pattern, and
profile to provide needed capacity and competency.
• Support the removal of barriers to anadromous fish movement and to help improve nursery
and spawning habitats.
• Strategically install stream structures and plantings designed to maintain vertical and lateral
stability and improve habitat diversity /complexity.
• Provide a sustainable and functional bankfull floodplain feature.
• Enhance and maintain hydrologic connection between stream and adjacent floodplain /riparian
corridors.
• Utilize the additional width of the swamp runs to provide natural filters for sediment and
nutrients and diffuse flow from upstream runoff.
• Install, augment, and maintain appropriate riparian buffer with sufficient density and
robustness to support native forest succession.
• Water quality enhancement through riparian forest planting and woody material installation,
and increased floodplain interaction /overbank flooding.
• Restore the existing ditched streams to single and multi- thread headwater systems with
forested riparian buffers.
•' Provide ecologically sound construction techniques that will require minimal grading and
disturbance.
2. SITE SELECTION
2.1 Directions to Site
The project, Hudson Site, consists of 13.49 acres positioned on 106.51 acres of agricultural land owned
by Charles E. Hudson. The project located within the northeast quadrant of the intersection between
Route 17 and Route 1127 (Possum Track Road) in Beaufort County, NC. More specifically, the project
lies approximately 6 miles southeast of the Chocowinity Bay and Pamlico River confluence, 4.3 miles
south of the town of Chocowinity, and 4.4 miles north of the Beaufort and Craven County line. The site
can be accessed by heading west on Possum Track Road (Rt. 1127) from Route 17 for approximately 1.1
miles (Exhibit A).
2.2 Site Selection
The site was chosen for various reasons including but not limited to: headwater location within the
Chocowinity Creek TLW, proximity to the 303d listed Chocowinity Bay, and the excellent opportunity
available to restore and re- connect riparian headwater stream and swamp run systems with existing
forest stands immediately adjacent to the project area. The site contains unnamed 15` and 2 "d order
tributaries with an upstream drainage area of approximately 190 acres that drain to Horse Branch which
is located within the Chocowinity Creek TLW (see Exhibit B and H). Historic aerial photographs show
• evidence of the natural headwater streams that were cleared for agriculture production.
Page 8 of 27 NCEEP Mitigation Template version 2.2 — 0610812012

•
The majority of the site is used for crop production, primarily corn, soybeans and wheat. As a result, the
lowering of local water tables, and in some cases the complete elimination of ground and surface water
interaction, has occurred and the degradation of water quality and downstream anadromous fish
spawning and nursery habitat have followed. According to the North Carolina Geologic map, the site lies
within the Yorktown Formation and Duplin Formations which is a combination of fossiliferous clay and
sand, shelly sand, sandy marl, and limestone. The site contains mostly low gradient non - hydric
moderately drained soil types such as Craven fine sandy loam (CrB) and Goldsboro fine sandy loam
(GoA) and within the Horse Branch floodplain the Muchalee loam (Me) hydric soil type is present
(Exhibit C). Hydric soils are seen in the stream bank profile which shows the opportunity to raise the
water table and re- establish normal base flow conditions. Historic aerial photographs from the years
1938, 1963, and 1979 show the extensive drainage network leading from southeast to northwest
(Exhibits E, F, G).
Between the years of 1938 to 1963, extensive forest clearing and agricultural production occurred on
the site, especially on the northwest portion of the site where the unnamed 2`d order tributary flows
into Horse Branch. From 1938 to 1948, logging in the northeast corner was completed and by 1963, the
entire project area was cleared and ditched for agriculture production. North Carolina Division of Water
Quality Stream Identification Forms have been completed for the degraded headwater streams and are
found in Appendix B (NC DWQ Stream ID Forms Version 4.11).
The project site and watershed conditions such as land use have remained relatively static with
• continued maintenance of agricultural land since 1979 (Exhibits B and 1). This trajectory will remain the
same with no proposed development trends within the project's watershed.
There are no known site constraints such as existing easements or crossings that would inhibit site
access and /or completion of the project. Small farm road crossings /culverts present on both the
upstream and downstream portions of the site will be removed as part of the restoration, and new
culvert crossings will be installed at the confluence of Reach 1 and Reach 4, upper limit of Reach 5 to
provide long term access to the mitigation site. An access road under the existing power line right -of-
way along Possum Track Road will also be installed to serve as the main access point into the mitigation
site.
3. SITE PROTECTION INSTRUMENT
3.1 Site Protection Instrument Summary Information
The land required for the construction, management and stewardship of this mitigation project includes
portions of the following parcels. A copy of the land protection instrument(s) is included in Appendix A.
Table 1. Parcel information for oroiect site
• The recorded document(s) are not available at this time. The template easement documents are
provided in Appendix A.
Page 9 of 27 NCEEP Mitigation Template version 2.2 — 0610812012
Landowner
PIN
County
Site Protection
Deed Book and
Acreage
Instrument
Page Number
Protected
Parcel A
Charles E. Hudson
12024438
Beaufort
Option
Book 1650,
13.49 AC
Page 0079
• The recorded document(s) are not available at this time. The template easement documents are
provided in Appendix A.
Page 9 of 27 NCEEP Mitigation Template version 2.2 — 0610812012

•
•
•
All site protection instruments require 60 -day advance notification to the Corps and the State prior to
any action to void, amend, or modify the document. No such action shall take place unless approved by
the State.
3.2 Site Protection Instrument Figure
Site protection instrument figure (Exhibit K) which shows the proposed easement limits in relation to the
overall property is provided at the end of this report.
Page 10 of 27
NCEEP Mitigation Template version 2.2 — 0610812012

•
•
U
4. BASELINE INFORMATION
Page 11 of 27
Table 2. Project information summary.
NCEEP Mitigation Template version 2.2 — 0610812012
Project information
Project name
HUDSON PROPERTY
County
BEAUFORT
Project Area (ac)
13.49 AC
Project Coordinates (Lat and Long)
77° 06" 13.62' W / 35° 26" 53.20' N
4.1 Project Watershed Summary Information
Physiographic province
INNER COASTAL PLAIN
River basin
TAR - PAMLICO RIVER BASIN
USGS Hydrologic Unit 8-
digit
03020104
USGS Hydrologic Unit 14 -digit
03020104010010
DWQ Sub -basin
CHOCOWINITY CREEK — HORSE
BRANCH
Project Drainage Area (acres)
190.86
Project Drainage Area Percentage of
Impervious Area
1.2 % (2.24 acres)
CGIA Land Use Classification
2.01.01.07 Annual Row Crop Rotation
4.2 Reach Summary Information
Parameters
Reach 1
Reach 2
Reach 3
Reach 4
Reach 5
Length of reach (linear feet)
766
516
611
503
689
Valley classification
VIII
VIII
VIII
VIII
VIII
Drainage area (acres)
40.51
74.63
35.21
150.35
190.86
NCDWR stream identification score
20.75
20.75
20.75
20.75
28
NCDWR Water Quality Classification
C;NSW
C;NSW
C;NSW
C;NSW
C;NSW
Morphological Description (stream type)
G5 -G6
G5 -G6
G5 -G6
G5 -G6
G5 -G6
Evolutionary trend
Early (CEM)
Early (CEM)
Early (CEM)
Early (CEM)
Early (CEM)
Underlying mapped soils
Goa & CrB
CrB & Ly
CrB & Ly
CrB
CrB & Me
Drainage class
MW
MW & SP
MW & SP
MW
MW & P
Soil Hydric status
Non - Hydric
Non - Hydric
Non - Hydric
Non - Hydric
Hydric
Slope (ft/ft)
0.009
0.006
0.008
0.004
0.003
FEMA classification
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
AE /X
Native vegetation community
Pasture /Crop
Pasture /Crop
Pasture /Crop
Pasture /Crop
Pasture /Crop
Percent composition of exotic invasive
vegetation
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
4.3 Regulatory Considerations
Regulation
Applicable?
Resolved?
Supporting
Documents
Waters of the United States — Section 404
YES
Waters of the United States — Section 401
YES
Endangered Species Act
NO
Historic Preservation Act
NO
Coastal Zone Management Act (CZMA)/
Coastal Area Management Act (CAMA)
NO
FEMA;Floodplain Compliance
NO
Essential Fisheries Habitat
NO
Page 11 of 27
Table 2. Project information summary.
NCEEP Mitigation Template version 2.2 — 0610812012

C
•
•
5. DETERMINATION OF CREDITS
Mitigation credits presented in Table 3 below are projections based upon site design. Upon completion
of site construction the project components and credits data will be revised to be consistent with the as-
built condition.
Hudson Property, Beaufort County
EEP Project Number: 004638
Mitigation Credits
Stream
Riparian wetland
Non - riparian
Buffer
Nitrogen
Phosphorous
wetland
Nutrient
Nutrient
Offset
Offset
Type
R
R R
RE
R
RE
"
Totals
2,891
13.80 AC
Project Components
Project
Stationing /Location
Existing
Approach
Restoration
Restoration
Mitigation
Component
Footage /Acreage
(PI, PH etc.)
or
Footage or
Ratio
or Reach ID
Restoration
Acreage
Equivalent
Reach 1
766 LF
PI
833 LF
1:1
Reach 2
516 LF
PI /PII
532 LF
1:1
Reach 3
611 LF
PI /PII
445 LF
1.1
Reach 4
503 LF
PI /PII
437 LF
1:1
Reach 5
689 LF
PI
644 LF
1:1
Total
3,085 LF
2,891 LF
Component Summation
Restoration Level
Stream
Riparian Wetland
Non - riparian
Buffer
Upland
(linear feet)
(acres)
Wetland (acres)
(square feet)
(acres)
,::�
5t5ht'✓nx
Riverine
Non
> "°�f,p� . "�''_d >w`/'x�'
ooyy ^ ",'
il'
0 . ,n4,,,,
n','! %� ynA!4;fP_7
'
�'��` „ %���;%y y ��3
,<;, „.,. i
tva°e -1, /
;` `� ,' a , ,' k
„1�:
"7#.#,?'�+�'335rd�,f.,,. ,;;yi q'„,
r�Ver�ne s,�.d4",+�
,e;i�e,�iv„/g 4'¢b
k <'dr,Hm?'r, i�.�,�?'�`
3k k•� - ;'ik "' yj
Restoration
2,891 LF
544,935 SF (12.51 ac)
Enhancement
, , /XR
Enhancement)
Sy
-? �,rn x,,,
c,
'A
r x ;
,m t
,c-
,:.a'�`<'�'�•,
Enhancement ll
Rik Wb<
%``%
�F<,„y9 #; /
of ':f"'�'.h, �;.
; ,{
/,!',k„ i'
�'%ho;
41
'.,iin'FL.Jp"M1r,
x ,
seYa4rfsx 'Y4'1CSL'<:zs
u`yd .� , k
t`
"a��i::i., l':1z 'ts,. �•'..%
Creation"
f
:Y �s'` .�,
` %riA' AA'+3, �5%°„.aS',fi Ll//"' ,",%
v°°, k•'�J D<'�,T as k;*MF�ih” / "' %r. `'o-.',¢„a
Preservation
sxf
BMP Elements
Element
Location
Purpose /Function
Notes
FB
Adjacent to stream
Buffer
100 feet on either side of stream centerline
BMP ELEMENTS
BR = Bioretention Cell; SF = Sand Filter; SW = Stormwater Wetland; WDP = Wet Detention Pond; DDP = Dry Detention Pond; FS = Filter Strip;
S = Grasses Swale; LS = Level Spreader; NI = Natural Infiltration Area; FB = Forest Buffer
Page 12 of 27
Table 3. Proposed mitigation credit projections.
NCEEP Mitigation Template version 2.2 — 0610812012

•
•
6. CREDIT RELEASE SCHEDULE
All credit releases will be based on the total credit generated as reported by the as -built survey of the
mitigation site. Under no circumstances shall any mitigation project be debited until the necessary DA
authorization has been received for its construction or the District Engineer (DE) has otherwise provided
written approval for the project in the case where no DA authorization is required for construction of
the mitigation project. The DE, in consultation with the Interagency Review Team (IRT), will determine if
performance standards have been satisfied sufficiently to meet the requirements of the release
schedules below. In cases where some performance standards have not been met, credits may still be
released depending on the specifics of the case. Monitoring may be required to restart or be extended,
depending on the extent to which the site fails to meet the specified performance standard. The release
of project credits will be subject to the criteria described in Table 4 below.
Stream Credits
Monitoring
Credit Release Activity
Interim
Total
Year
Release
Released
0
Initial allocation —see requirements below
30%
30%
1
First year monitoring report demonstrates performance standards are being met
10%
40%
2
Second year monitoring report demonstrates performance standards are being met
10%
50%
(60 % *)
3
Third year monitoring report demonstrates performance standards are being met
10%
60%
(70 % *)
4
Fourth year monitoring report demonstrates performance standards are being met
5%
65%
(75 % *)
5
Fifth year monitoring report demonstrates performance standards are being met
10%
75%
(85 % *)
6
Sixth year monitoring report demonstrates performance standards are being met
5%
80%
(90 % *)
7
Seventh year monitoring report demonstrates performance standards are being
10%
90%
met and project has received closeout approval
(100 % *)
Table 4. Proposed credit release schedule.
6.1 Initial Allocation of Released Credits
The initial allocation of released credits, as specified in the mitigation plan can be released by the WEEP
without prior written approval of the DE upon satisfactory completion of the following activities:
a. Approval of the final Mitigation Plan
b. Recordation. of the preservation mechanism, as well as a title opinion acceptable to the USACE
covering the property
c. Completion of project construction (the initial physical and biological improvements to the
mitigation site) pursuant to the mitigation plan; Per the NCEEP Instrument, construction means
that a mitigation site has been constructed in its entirety, to include planting, and an as -built
• report has been produced. As -built reports must be sealed by an engineer prior to project
closeout, if appropriate but not prior to the initial allocation of released credits.
Page 13 of 27 NCEEP Mitigation Template version 2.2 — 0610812012

•
d. Receipt of necessary DA permit authorization or written DA approval for projects where DA
permit issuance is not required.
6.2 Subsequent Credit Releases
All subsequent credit releases must be approved by the DE, in consultation with the IRT, based on a
determination that required performance standards have been achieved. For stream projects a reserve
of 10% of a site's total stream credits shall be released after two bank -full events have occurred, in
separate years, provided the channel is stable and all other performance standards are met. In the event
that less than two bank -full events occur during the monitoring period, release of these reserve credits
shall be at the discretion of the IRT. As projects approach milestones associated with credit release, the
NCEEP will submit a request for credit release to the DE along with documentation substantiating
achievement of criteria required for release to occur. This documentation will be included with the
annual monitoring report.
7. MITIGATION WORK PLAN
7.1 Target Stream Type(s) and Plant Communities
As stated within both the Site selection (Section 2.2) and Baseline data table (Section 4), the existing
channelized reaches are classified as G5 -G6 stream types. The channel evolution model is not applicable
• in this setting because the ditches continue to be maintained and channelized therefore the
evolutionary trend is not able to move forward. The existing ditches are entrenched with low width -
depth ratios and do not have ,active floodplains available. The target stream types for Reaches 1
through 4 are low sinuosity "C" channels. Reach 1 will be raised to reconnect to the existing floodplain
elevation (Priority 1 restoration). Restoration of reaches 2, 3 and 4 will involve raising and re- aligning
the channel invert /thalweg where possible and grading a functional floodplain that ties into the existing
grade to mimic natural conditions (Priority 1/2 restoration) to ensure positive flow within the reach and
from,, upslope areas. Reach 5 target stream type is a "D" channel with a high width -depth ratio and
increased channel capacity due to the reach's close proximity to the Horse Branch Swamp (Priority 2
restoration).
To achieve these target stream types, reference reach data collected from an unnamed tributary to
Bennett's Creek located in Merchant's Millpond State Park within the Chowan River Basin was used as a
guide in the design process (see Exhibit J for reference reach location). Both the project and reference
sites are located within the Outer Coastal Plain physiographic province.
The riparian plant communities chosen for the project are native to the area, with an emphasis on
species that will provide habitat and a viable, yearlong food source for a wide range of animal and plant
species. The adjacent forested wetlands and swamps within Horse Branch and Chocowinity Creek are
home to wild turkeys, bear, whitetail deer, raccoon, squirrel, fox, migrating waterfowl, and a wide
variety of amphibian and reptile species. The project is intended to provide food, habitat, and corridors
to complement and enhance the existing ecosystem. Invasive and exotic species will not be planted on
the site and if found, they will be removed through physical or chemical means during the planting
phase. In selecting vegetation, we have considered reference riparian areas adjacent to the site and
Page 14 of 27 NCEEP Mitigation Template version 2.2 — 0610812012

•
"Dominant Plants for Major Wetland Types" published by the North Carolina Department of
Environment Water Quality Section (NCDENR, 1997).
7.2 Design Methodology
In order to properly restore the degraded channels within the project area, the overall design goal is to
convert the channelized reaches to more stable stream types. Because of the low entrenchment and
width /depth ratios of the existing reach cross sections, reconfiguring the dimension, pattern, and profile
of the channels are the most effective method of restoring a stable system. The project will create
channels connected to the floodplain and the project area has been broken into five distinct reaches
based on drainage area and landscape position.
For reaches 1 through 4, a single thread low sinuosity C5 -C6 and Cb channel types (depending on
slope) was selected to provide a higher width -depth ratio and increased floodplain connection. After
evaluating historic conditions (specifically the 1938 aerial), discussion with the IRT, and taking into
account the slightly higher channel and valley slopes within this area, a single thread design channel was
chosen. A headwater system /multi- thread "D" type channel has been chosen for Reach 5 to mimic the
diffuse flow patterns and dense vegetation seen in undisturbed areas of Horse Branch.
Parameters for the proposed channel morphology are based upon the design stream type, historical
conditions evident from mid 1900's aerial photography and data from the Millpond State park reference
reach surveyed by Ecotone, Inc. Dimensionless ratios taken from the reference reach with dissimilar
• drainage areas allowed channel morphology data from the reference reaches to be used for this project.
7.3 Reference Reach
U
Natural channel design protocol calls for using a reference reach located in the same physiographic
province as the reference site. The Merchant's Millpond site was chosen because it is located in the
Inner Coastal Plain physiographic province as well as the Mid - Atlantic Coastal Plain ecoregion. It
contains undisturbed first and second order tributaries in a similar landscape position to those found on
the project site. Because much of the inner coastal plain has been developed for agricultural
production, undisturbed reference sites are rare. The Merchant's Millpond State Park site offers an
excellent opportunity to survey streams in an almost completely undisturbed condition. This reference
reach surveyed contained both low gradient (<1 %) single and multi- thread sections typical of low
gradient and headwater system streams within the coastal plain region of North Carolina. The photo
exhibit found in Appendix E show typical conditions encountered at the reference site.
Wolman pebble counts were attempted at the reference site and all mineral material collected was
smaller than 2 millimeters, further validating the reference reach as a low energy sand bed system.
Visual inspection of the project site, combined with soil survey data and anecdotal information from the
landowner indicate that the soils on site are sand and loam. Native subsoil will form the bed and banks
of the proposed channel, similar to the conditions seen at the reference site. It should also be noted
that the reference site contained naturally occurring woody debris impregnated sand riffles, which will
be utilized on the project site. Photos of these riffles are found in the Appendix E photo exhibit.
Page 15 of 27 NCEEP Mitigation Template version 2.2 — 0610812012

•
7.4 Design Parameters
TR -55 was run for each reach, and the two year flow (Q) was chosen as the basis for the design. See
section 7.3 below for a detailed explanation of the derivation of hydrology for the site. Reaches 1
through 4 will be designed to hold the 2 -year TR -55 flow and allow higher flows to escape the channel
and spread into an area similar to the historic floodplain to provide greater sediment and pollutant
attenuation. Near bank stress and erosion will be reduced by lowering the current flow velocities and
sizing the channels to have minimal shear stress.
Riffles and pools will be constructed according to reference reach ratios derived from the Merchant's
Millpond State Park reference reach site. Stable riffle slopes and pool depths will be utilized to
accommodate high flow events and the movement of sediments. Riffle slopes will vary from 1 to 2
percent in reaches 1 though 4 where the low sinuosity C5 -C6 channels are proposed. Pool depths will
vary from 0.35 feet to 0.75 feet throughout the restoration with the deeper pools placed in sections
where riffle slopes are higher. Pool spacing increases as a function of increasing channel width and will
vary from 30 to 55 feet.
To mimic the riffle- run -pool morphology and the natural condition of low gradient, headwater coastal
plain streams, constructed riffles composed of woody material of various sizes embedded into native
subsoil material found onsite will be used to provide vertical stability and bed form diversity. These
features are naturally occurring in the Mid - Atlantic Coastal Plain ecoregion and form the basis for
stability in low gradient sand -based systems. Photographs of naturally occurring woody material
• impregnated riffles can be found in the reference reach information provided with this report.
The downstream portions of Reaches 1, 3, and 4 will have higher slopes ( +/- 1.5 - 3 %) to transition from
the upstream low energy channels to the existing invert at the downstream end of the project limits.
These transitional channels will mimic naturally occurring high energy systems, and the log drops are
engineered to create conditions similar to those create by large woody debris jams seen in nature.
Because natural debris jam dominated systems do not have "typical" spacing and slope patterns (as they
are generally formed by random inputs of large woody materials to the channel), spacing of the logjams
selected for this project is fairly standard with elevation changes of less than 0.5 feet at each structure.
The log cross vanes will be installed within these sections to provide a stable transition and ensure long
term vertical stability.
Reach 5 is designed as a typical headwater system and therefore does not have the typical design
parameters associated with traditional natural channel design. This reach will have less bed form
diversity due to the lower slope ( <0.4 %) and proximity to the Horse Branch floodplain. The headwater
system channel geometry with high width ratio and minimal sinuosity will provide larger channel
capacity and surface area to promote sediment and nutrient trapping and processing as well as
hyporheic exchange. Reach 5 will be graded such to create diffuse flow patterns and multi- threaded
channels.
Culverts and farm road crossings within Reaches 1 -4 will be removed to complete the proposed channel
work. A farm road crossing will install at the beginning of Reach 1 and will consist of a 24" HDPE Type S
corrugated plastic pipe (CPP). Access road crossings for long term maintenance will be installed at the
• upper limit of Reach 5 and at the confluence of Reaches 1 and 4 to provide effective stormwater
conveyance and a stable long term crossing to access the northern portions of the remaining property.
Page 16 of 27 NCEEP Mitigation Template version 2.2 — 0610812012

•
These crossings will consist of two 30 inch HDPE Type S corrugated CPP's. Proper sizing of the proposed
culverts was completed using the N.C. Forestry Best Management Practices Manual (2006), specifically
Appendix 9 entitled Talbot's Table for Round Culvert Sizing.
Sediment transport was not seen as a major design consideration for the project because all of the
single thread channels are first or second order low energy tributaries found in the upper reaches of the
watershed where little sediment supply exists. The intended stream condition will be stable, with little
or no movement of non - organic bed material expected during storm events. Woody debris are
expected to play a large role in forming and maintaining channel profile features, as the ultimate
condition will be channels with low banks and riparian areas densely vegetated with native trees, shrubs
and herbaceous material. Woody debris impregnated riffle structures and log cross vanes have been
designed to mimic natural conditions of channels in a similar landscape position, and as the adjacent
planted areas mature they will provide a steady supply of new woody materials to the channel.
The woody debris impregnated riffles will incorporate a mix of native subsoil material and woody debris
that will remain in place during flows above bankfull. Traditional entrainment calculations cannot
accurately assess potential transport or movement of woody debris. Studies conducted on large woody
debris in streams focus on drag and buoyancy calculations, which do not reliably translate to a woody
debris impregnated substrate condition. Because more than two - thirds of the proposed pieces of
woody materials used in the riffles will be buried, both buoyancy and drag forces are expected to be
negligible.
• The steeper high energy transition areas or reaches 1, 3 and 4 will be stabilized using log vanes drop
structures. Buoyancy and drag calculations have not been completed for these reaches because more
than half of each log will be buried and the crossover points will be securely anchored with rebar. In
addition, backfill behind each structure will be comprised of native substrate material and small woody
debris, similar to riffle areas.
Reach 5 is designed to be a swamp run, typical of coastal plain streams. These systems have extremely
low or nonexistent sediment transport rates, and the substrate is typically dominated by clay and silt
with dense live woody root mass providing stability. The reach was not evaluated for entrainment
because for the 10 -year storm event, velocities values are less than 2 feet per second and shear stress
values are less than 0.23 pounds per square foot.
By grading the site to create stable stream channels and planting the entire area with woody vegetation
and a native wetland seed mix, the project will slow overland runoff and provide storage and water
quality treatment before it reaches Horse Branch. Stream banks and immediate floodprone areas on
both sides will be seeded, protected with coir erosion control matting and planted with live stakes.
These improvements will also serve to make downstream primary and secondary fishery nursery areas
more productive.
When completed, each reach segment will be designed to reach "bankfull elevation" and restore historic
flow to a degraded riparian headwater system. This transition, from degraded stream channels
surrounded by agricultural fields, to restored headwater stream /swamp runs, will provide water quality
improvement through sediment, toxicant, and nutrient retention and reduction, production and export
• of food sources, and enhancement of wildlife habitat
Page 17 of 27 NCEEP Mitigation Template version 2.2 — 0610812012

•
7.5 Narrative of Data Analysis
7.5.1' Hydrology
Two delineation methods were used in determining the site's drainage area. The USGS National
Hydrology Dataset Watershed Tool served as the primary delineation of the drainage basin which was
then field verified and corrected to account for the presence of extensive ditch networks. Using the
field verified drainage area of 196 acres, the 2, 10, 50, and 100 year recurrence interval discharges were
calculated for each reach using a variety of methods including but not limited to: USDA TR -55 program,
North Carolina State University (NCSU) Coastal Plain Regional Curve, and USGS StreamStats Regression
equations. After assessing the variety of discharges from the different sources listed above, the design
team'chose the TR -55 discharges as they best represented the small watershed size of the project and fit
in line with the Coastal Plain regional curve discharge estimates (see Table 5 below).
Reach Design Discharges (TR -55)
Maintenance through project close -out
Drainage
Routine channel maintenance and repair activities may
include securing of loose coir matting and supplemental
installations of live stakes and other target vegetation
along the channel. Areas where stormwater and
floodplain flows intercept the channel may also require
Drainage
2 Year
10 Year
25 Year
50 Year
100 Year
Reach
Area
Reach Length (ft)
Reach Slope (ft /ft)
Area (ac)
(cfs)
(cfs)
(cfs)
(cfs)
(cfs)
(mil)
Reach 1
0.065
41.77
833
0.006 / 0.029
7.4
23.2
26.6
34.6
43.5
Reach 2
0.078
50.20
532
0.0035
11.8
32.3
36.7
47.0
58.3
Reach 3
0.042
26.57
445
0.005 / 0.016
5.9
16.6
18.9
24.3
30.2
Reach 4
0.128
82.21
437
0.0035 / 0.020
19.2
52.5
59.7
76.3
94.5
Reach 5
0.267
170.66
644
0.003
38.9
109.6
124.7
160.1
199.5
Table 5. Reach Design Discharges
7.5.2, Hydraulics
A complete pre- and post- floodplain study has been completed by Ecosystem Services, LLC and is
provided in Appendix C.
Albemarle Restorations shall monitor the site on a regular basis and shall conduct a physical inspection
of the site a minimum of once per year throughout the post- construction monitoring period until
performance standards are met. These site inspections may identify site components and features that
require routine maintenance. Routine maintenance should be expected most often in the first two years
following site construction and may include the following:
Component /Feature
Maintenance through project close -out
Stream
Routine channel maintenance and repair activities may
include securing of loose coir matting and supplemental
installations of live stakes and other target vegetation
along the channel. Areas where stormwater and
floodplain flows intercept the channel may also require
maintenance to prevent bank failures and head - cutting.
Page 18 of 27 NCEEP Mitigation Template version 2.2 - 0610812012

•
Vegetation
Vegetation shall be maintained to ensure the health and
vigor of the targeted plant community. Routine
vegetation maintenance and repair activities may
include supplemental planting, pruning, mulching, and
fertilizing. Exotic invasive plant species shall be
controlled by mechanical and /or chemical methods. Any
vegetation control requiring herbicide application will be
performed in accordance with NC Department of
Agriculture (NCDA) rules and regulations.
Site Boundary
Site boundaries shall be identified in the field to ensure
clear distinction between the mitigation site and
adjacent properties. Boundaries may be identified by
fence, marker, bollard, post, tree - blazing, or other
means as allowed by site conditions and /or conservation
easement. Boundary markers disturbed, damaged, or
destroyed will be repaired and /or replaced on an as
needed basis.
Pest Management
Other potential issues including animal damage, disease,
or pest infestation, or damage from extreme weather
events will be noted during monitoring, with any
apparent problem areas mapped for inclusion into the
monitoring report. The monitoring will also include any
corrective actions taken or proposed.
Road Crossing
Road crossings within the site may be maintained only as
allowed by Conservation Easement or existing
easement, deed restrictions, rights of way, or corridor
agreements.
Table 6. Anticipated Maintenance Activities
9. PERFORMANCE STANDARDS
9.1 Stream Restoration Hydrology Performance Standards
9.1.1 Headwater System (Reach 5)
Surface water flow must be documented to occur at least 2 times per year for 4 years out of the 7 -year
monitoring period during normal rainfall conditions. Additional monitoring may be necessary in the
event of abnormal climatic conditions.
9.1.2 Single Thread Channels (Reaches 1- 4)
All restored channels shall receive sufficient flow through the monitoring period to maintain an Ordinary
• High Water Mark (OHWM). Field indicators of flow events include a natural line impressed on the bank;
shelving; changes in soil characteristics; destruction of terrestrial vegetation; presence of litter and
Page 19'of 27 NCEEP Mitigation Template version 2.2 — 0610812012

•
debris; wracking; vegetation matted down, bent or absent; sediment sorting; leaf litter disturbed or
washed away; scour; deposition; bed and bank formation; water staining; or change in plant community.
In addition, two overbank flows shall be documented for each reach during the monitoring period using
continuously monitored pressure transducers and crest gauges. All collected data and field indicators of
water flow shall be documented in each monitoring report. The stream project shall remain stable and
all other performance standards shall be met through two separate bankfull events, occurring in
separate years, during the 7 year post construction monitoring period.
9.2 Stream Channel Restoration Stability Performance Standards
9.2.1 Headwater System (Reach 5)
All stream areas shall remain stable with no areas of accelerated erosion seen.
9.2.2 Single Thread Channels (Reaches 1- 4)
1. Bank Height Ratio (BHR) shall not exceed 1.2 within restored reaches of the stream channel. This
standard only applies to restored reaches of the channel where BHR is corrected through design
and construction.
2. Entrenchment Ratio (ER) shall be no less than 2.2 within restored reaches of the stream channel.
This standard only applies to restored reaches of the channel where ER is corrected through
design and construction.
• 9.3 Planted Vegetation Performance Standards (Stream Buffer Areas)
1. At least 320 three year -old planted stems /acre must be present after year three. At year five,
density must be no less than 260 five year -old planted stems /acre. At year 7, density must be no
less than 210 seven year -old planted stems /acre.
2. Planted vegetation must average 10 feet in height in each plot at year 7 (as defined in the
USACE 2003 SMGs). If this performance standard is met by year 5 and stem density is trending
toward success (i.e., no less than 260 five year -old stems /acre) monitoring of vegetation on the
site may be terminated provided written approval is provided by the USACE in consultation with
the North Carolina Interagency Review Team (NCIRT).
•
10. MONITORING REQUIREMENTS
Monitoring Reports will be submitted to EEP by December 1st of the year in which the monitoring was
conducted. In the unlikely event that the success criteria are not being achieved during the seven -year
minimum monitoring period, with permission from EEP, corrective measures including re- grading,
replacement of structures, replanting, removal of certain species, etc. will be performed. Annual
monitoring data will be reported using the EEP monitoring template. The monitoring report shall
provide a project data chronology that will facilitate an understanding of project status and trends,
population of EEP databases for analysis, research purposes, and assist in decision making regarding
project close -out.
Page 20 of 27 NCEEP Mitigation Template version 2.2 — 0610812012

•
r]
Required
Parameter
Quantity
Frequency
Notes
Monitoring
Cross - sections to be monitored over
Dimension
As per November 2011 NCEEP
Years 1, 2, 3, 5,
seven (7) years and shall include an
monitoring requirements
and 7
assessment of bank height ratio and
entrenchment ratio
Monitoring
Bank pin arrays shall be installed at
Bank Erosion Pins
As per November 2011 NCEEP
Years 1, 2, 3, 5,
pool (bend) monitoring cross - sections;
monitoring requirements
and 7
arrays shall be measured at time of
cross - section surveys
Profile
As per November 2011 NCEEP
As needed
monitoring requirements
Concentrations of woody debris in
As per April 2003 USACE
constructed riffles will be visually
Substrate
Wilmington District Stream
Annual
assessed semi - annually /annually to
Mitigation Guidelines
determine if riffle areas are remaining
stable.
A Crest Gauge and /or Pressure
As per April 2003 USACE
Transducer will be installed on site; the
Surface Water
Wilmington District Stream
Annual
device will be inspected on a
Hydrology
Mitigation Guidelines
quarterly /semi - annual basis to
document the occurrence of bankfull
events on the project
Quantity and location of
vegetation plots will be
Monitoring
Vegetation will be monitored using the
Vegetation
g
determined in consultation with
Years 1, 2, 3, 5,
Carolina Vegetation Survey (CVS)
EEP
and 7
protocols (Peet et. al. 2008)
Exotic and nuisance
Semi- annual
Locations of exotic and nuisance
vegetation
vegetation will be mapped
Locations offence damage, vegetation
Project boundary
Semi- annual
damage, boundary encroachments, etc.
will be mapped
Table 7. Monitoring data requirements.
10.1 General Stream and Wetland Monitoring Requirements
1. Site monitoring for all stream and /or wetland mitigation projects shall occur for seven full years
(post construction) except in those circumstances provided for in this document where specific
monitoring activities may be terminated as early as five years. If performance standards have
not been met by year seven, additional monitoring may be required to ensure that a site is
relatively stable with respect to anthropogenic or natural effects and that the target community
is established on the site or the site (or portions of the site) may be deemed to be unacceptable
for generation of compensatory mitigation credit.
2. Seven years of monitoring are not required for stream and /or wetland preservation reaches or
areas which are subject to Monitoring Level 3 requirements of the USACE 2003 SMGs.
3. Success criteria as provided in the mitigation plan or in the permit conditions must be restated
verbatim in the monitoring report.
4. Monitoring reports shall be completed for all seven years and provided to the Ecosystem
Enhancement Program (EEP) for review by December 1St of each year that the site is required to
be monitored. This is to ensure that any remedial action that may be necessary can be
accomplished during the next planting season. Failure to provide monitoring reports by this
deadline may result in additional monitoring.
S. Vegetation monitoring standards shall apply to all stream and /or wetland mitigation projects.
Page 21 of 27 NCEEP Mitigation Template version 2.2 — 0610812012

•
10.2 Stream Channel Surface Water Hydrology Monitoring Requirements (Reach 5)
1. Surface flow shall be documented using pressure transducers with a staff plat and /or and flow
meters located near the lowest point of the proposed stream area.
2. Three flow monitoring stations will be located within each reach, one at the upstream limit of
the reach, one at the downstream limit and one near the middle of the reach.
3. Other evidence of flow, including rack lines, sediment sorting, debris jams, localized scour and
disturbed vegetation will also be visually assessed and documented during monitoring visits.
10.3 Stream Surface Water Hydrology Monitoring Requirements (Reaches 1 -4)
1. Surface water flow shall be documented using pressure transducers and staff plates located
near the channel thalweg.
2. Three flow monitoring stations will be located within each reach, one at the upstream limit of
the reach, one at the downstream limit and one near the middle of the reach. In areas where
one reach is contiguous with another reach, one flow monitoring station will be used to collect
data for both reaches where appropriate.
3. Other evidence of flow, including an ordinary high water mark, rack lines, sediment sorting, pool
and riffle formation and debris jams will be visually assed and documented during each
monitoring visit.
10.4. Stream Channel Stability Monitoring Requirements (Reach 5)
1. Channel areas will be visually assessed to determine if undesirable changes to channel
• morphology are occurring.
2. If any areas of excessive scour or erosion are seen, those areas will be assessed to determine if
remedial measures are necessary or if adaptive management strategies are necessary.
10.5 Stream Channel Stability Monitoring Requirements (Reaches 1— 4)
3. As -built surveys shall be conducted upon completion of channel construction to document
baseline conditions. As -built surveys shall include all measurements typically documented
during subsequent channel geomorphological surveys. A longitudinal profile of the thalweg,
water surface, bankfull, and top of bank, shall also be collected during the as -built survey of the
constructed channel to compare with future geomorphological data, if necessary. Longitudinal
profiles shall not be required during routine channel stability monitoring (years 1 through 7)
unless the monitoring efforts demonstrate channel bank or bed instability, in which case
additional longitudinal profiles may be required by the USACE along channel reaches of concern
to track changes in the channel and demonstrate stability.
4. Reference stakes, indicating the surveyed station and corresponding to the as -built survey, shall
be installed in the riparian buffer near the stream bank every 100 feet along the length of the
stream.
5. Channel cross - sections shall be monitored for 7 years, with monitoring events occurring in years
1, 2, 3, 5, and 7. If the Sponsor /Permittee chooses to conduct supplemental monitoring, results
may be considered towards meeting performance standards.
6. Per the USACE 2003 SMGs, permanent, monumented cross - sections shall be installed at a rate
of 1 cross - section per 20 bankfull channel widths, with approximately 50% of cross - sections
• occurring at pools and 50% at riffles /ripples. All channel cross - sections shall include
Page 22 of 27 NCEEP Mitigation Template version 2.2 — 0610812012

measurements of Bank Height Ratio and Entrenchment Ratio, which shall be documented in
monitoring reports.
7. At each monitored cross - section located on a stream bend (typically at pool locations), a bank
pin array shall be installed along the outer bend of the stream. Bank pins may consist of chain,
rebar, or wire driven horizontally into the bank face, and should be a minimum of 3 feet long. A
minimum of one pin per 2 feet of bank height shall be installed vertically at each location, with
the lowest pin installed just above the normal water line and additional pins installed at 2 -foot
intervals above the first. Vertical series of pins should be installed in at least three locations - at
the monumented cross - section, the upstream third of the meander bend, and downstream third
of the meander bend. The pins shall be installed flush to the face of the stream bank, and the
length of exposed pin shall be measured and reported during each cross - section monitoring
event. Once the exposure has been measured, the pin should be hammered flush with the face
of the bank. Lateral movement of the stream banks as indicated by pin exposure shall be
included in all monitoring reports. Additional bank pin arrays may be required by the USACE to
document erosion along particular reaches of channel where concern over channel stability is
identified during routine monitoring events. Bank pins are not required on channels with a
bankfull width of less than 3 feet, unless indicated by the results of the monitoring or required
by the USACE.
10.6 Visual Monitoring Requirements for Single Thread Streams (Reaches 1- 4)
1. Visual monitoring of all sections of the project shall be conducted in each of the required seven
years of monitoring to identify areas of concern in both the vegetated buffer and restored
stream channel. The following requirements apply to all stream mitigation projects that are
required to comply with Monitoring Levels 1 & 2 in the USACE 2003 SMGs, including all forms of
Restoration and Enhancement (Level I and II).
2. Visual monitoring of all sections of the stream project shall be conducted twice per monitoring
year. Generally, one visual monitoring event should be done in conjunction with other stream
channel stability monitoring (e.g., cross - sections, bank pins, etc.). At least 5 months shall
separate each visual monitoring event.
3. Within the stream channel, visual monitoring shall be conducted along the entire length of the
channel to identify and document excessive lateral movement of the channel, bank instability,
instability /failure of in- stream structures, structure piping, headcuts, beaver activity, excessive
live stake mortality, invasive species, aggradation /excessive sediment deposition, or other
potential problems with the channel. Visual monitoring of streams shall be conducted only by
individuals that have been properly trained to assess the stability of streams and condition of in-
stream structures.
4. Within the vegetated buffer, visual monitoring shall be conducted by walking throughout the
entire site to identify and document areas of low stem density or poor plant vigor, invasive
species, beaver activity, herbivory, encroachments, indicators of livestock access, or other areas
of concern.
5. The results of the visual assessment shall be included in a plan view of the channel identifying
the location of each feature of concern, along with a written assessment and photographic
documentation of the feature. Once a feature of concern has been identified, that same feature
• shall be reassessed on all subsequent visual assessments. Photographs should be taken from the
same location year -to -year to document progression of the problem. The monitoring reports
Page 23 of 27 NCEEP Mitigation Template version 2.2 — 0610812012

r�
U
shall identify all features of concern and recommended courses of action, which may include
continued monitoring, repair or other remedial action.
10.7 Vegetation Planting Monitoring Requirements
1.
Seven permanent plots to sample vegetation shall be randomly located in each of the target
communities. Plot sizes for the determination of stem density and vigor (height) shall be a
minimum of 0.02 acre in size, and should typically be square or rectangular.
2.
Vegetation monitoring plots shall make up a minimum of 1% of the planted portion of the site
with a minimum of 4 plots.
3.
Upon initial establishment of vegetation plots (baseline /year 0), the plot corners shall be
marked in accordance with CVS Protocol (version 4.2 — 2008).
4.
Within each plot, vegetation data collected will be in accordance with CVS Protocol (version 4.2
—2008).
5.
Vegetation plots shall be monitored for 7 years, with monitoring events occurring in years 1, 2,
3, 5, and 7. If supplemental monitoring occurs, results may be considered towards meeting
performance standards.
6.
At least 180 days, occurring between March 1 and November 30, must separate the completion
of the initial vegetation planting and the initiation of the first year of monitoring (Year 1). If 180
days has not occurred since the completion of vegetation plantings, the first year of monitoring
must occur during the following year.
7.
Individual plot data for planted species must be provided. Plot-data shall not be averaged over
the entire site to obtain a single figure for stem density.
8.
'Enumeration of the density of planted species: density = number of living, planted stems per
acre. "Stems are defined as individual plants, where plants with multiple shoots are treated as a
single stem.
9.
Live stakes planted on the stream banks shall not count toward meeting the stem density
requirements.
10.
Volunteer plants growing within plots may be considered on a case -by -case basis in determining
whether a project has met the overall goal of reestablishing the vegetated buffer; however,
volunteer plants shall be counted separately from planted vegetation in the monitoring reports.
Monitoring events should also be used to evaluate the site for the presence of invasive species,
which should be noted in the monitoring report.
•
11. LONG -TERM MANAGEMENT PLAN
Upon approval for close -out by the Interagency Review Team (IRT) the site will be transferred to a third
party for long term management as described in EEP's In Lieu Fee instrument. This party shall be
responsible for periodic inspection of the site to ensure that restrictions required in the conservation
easement or the deed restriction document(s) are upheld. Endowment funds required to uphold
easement and deed restrictions shall be negotiated prior to site transfer to the responsible party.
Page 24 of 27 NCEEP Mitigation Template version 2.2 — 0610812012

•
•
•
12. ADAPTIVE MANAGEMENT PLAN
Upon completion of site construction, Albemarle Restorations will implement the post- construction
monitoring protocols previously defined in this document. Project maintenance will be performed as
described previously in this document. If, during the course of annual monitoring it is determined the
site's ability to achieve site performance standards are jeopardized, EEP will notify the USACE of the
need to develop a Plan of Corrective Action. The Plan of Corrective Action may be prepared using in-
house technical staff or may require engineering and consulting services. Once the Corrective Action
Plan is prepared and finalized EEP will:
1. Notify the USACE as required by the Nationwide 27 permit general conditions.
2. Revise performance standards, maintenance requirements, and monitoring requirements as
necessary and /or required by the USACE.
3. Obtain other permits as necessary.
4. Implement the Corrective Action Plan.
5. Provide the USACE a Record Drawing of Corrective Actions. This document shall depict the
extent and nature of the work performed.
13. FINANCIAL ASSURANCES
Pursuant to Section IV H and Appendix III of the Ecosystem Enhancement Program's In -Lieu Fee
Instrument dated July 28, 2010, the North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
has provided the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Wilmington District with a formal commitment to fund
projects to satisfy mitigation requirements assumed by EEP. This commitment provides financial
assurance for all mitigation projects implemented by the program.
14. OTHER INFORMATION
14.1 Definitions
Morphological description — the stream type; stream type is determined by quantifying channel
entrenchment, dimension, pattern, profile, and boundary materials; as described in Rosgen, D. (1996),
Applied River Morphology, 2nd edition
Native vegetation community — a distinct and reoccurring assemblage of populations of plants, animals,
bacteria and fungi naturally associated with each other and their population; as described in Schafale,
M.P. and Weakley, A. S. (1990), Classification of the Natural Communities of North Carolina, Third
Approximation
Project Area - includes all protected lands associated with the mitigation project
Page 25 of 27
NCEEP Mitigation Template version 2.2 — 0610812012

C]
14.2 References
Faber- Langendoen, D., Rocchio, J., Schafale, M., Nordman, C., Pyne, M., Teague, J., Foti, T., Comer, P.
(2006), Ecological Integrity Assessment and Performance Measures for Wetland Mitigation.
NatureServe, Arlington, Virginia.
Lindenmayer, D.B., and J.F. Franklin. (2002), Conserving forest biodiversity: A comprehensive multiscaled
approach. Island Press, Washington, DC.
Natural Resources Conservation Service (2007), Part 654 National Engineering Handbook: Stream
Restoration Design.
Natural Resources Conservation Service (June 1, 2001), Technical Notes Engineering #25 Incorporation of
Large Wood into Engineered Structures.
North Carolina Forestry Best Management Practices Manual to Protect Water Quality (2006), Appendix
9: Talbot's Table for Round Culvert Sizing. North Carolina Forest Service publication number WQ0107.
http: / /ncforestservice.gov /water quality /bmp manual.htm
North Carolina Division of Water Resources, Water Quality Programs (2010), Tar - Pamlico Basinwide
Water Quality Plan.
• North Department of Environment and Natural Resources, Division of Water Quality. NCDWQ Stream ID
Form Version 4.11.
North Carolina Department of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources (1997), Common Wetland
Plants of North Carolina.
North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program (2011), Monitoring Requirements and Performance
Standards for Stream and /or Wetland Mitigation.
Peet, R.K., Wentworth, T.S., and Lee, M.T. (2008), CVS -EEP Protocol for Recording Vegetation: All Levels
of Plot Sampling, Version 4.2.
Rosgen, D. (1996), Applied River Morphology, 2nd edition, Wildland Hydrology, Pagosa Springs, CO
Rosgen, D. (2000), A Practical Method of Computing Streambank Erosion Rate, Wildland Hydrology,
Pagosa Springs, CO
Schafale, M.P. and Weakley, A. S. (1990), Classification of the Natural Communities of North Carolina,
Third Approximation, NC Natural Heritage Program, Raleigh, NC.
Sweet, W.G., and Geratz, J.W. (2003) Bankfull Hydraulic Geometry Relationships and Recurrence
Intervals for the North Carolina Coastal Plain. Journal of the American Water Resources Association.
Page 26 of 27 NCEEP Mitigation Template version 2.2 — 0610812012

•
•
i
Shields, Douglas F. Jr., Nathalie Morin and C.M. Cooper. Design of Large Woody Debris Structures for
Channel Rehabilitation. USDA -ARS- National Sedimentation Laboratory, Oxford, MS.
US Army Corps of Engineers Wilmington District (2003), Stream Mitigation Guidelines, April 2003
Young, T.F. and Sanzone, S. (editors). (2002), A framework for assessing and reporting on ecological
condition. Ecological Reporting Panel, Ecological Processes and Effects Committee. EPA Science Advisory
Board. Washington, DC.
Page 27 of 27
NCEEP Mitigation Template version 2.2 — 0610812012

•
Scale: N.T.S.
4 LEGEND
f r` Project
osS4
�i Traok
8/2013
ALBEMARLE RESTORATIONS, LLC
WETLAND RESTORATION,
P.O. BOX 176. FAIRFIELD. NC 27826
(252) 3330249 .FAX [phone]
EXHIBIT F
HISTORIC AERIAL (1963)
Drawn By: WJV
tem
III ival 61A
PREWRAM
Parcel Boundary
HUDSON PROPERTY
EEP# 004638
TAR - PAMLICO RIVER BASIN
CHOCOWINITY CREEK TLW
(HUC:03020104010010)

• Exhibit I - Site Photographs
• Photo #1: Facing upstream towards existing Forest Stand at proposed Reach 1
•
Photo #2: Facing upstream at end of proposed Reach 1 and 4 confluence

• Exhibit I - Site Photographs
•
•
Photo #3: Facing upstream at proposed Reach 2
Photo #4: Facing upstream at existing culvert within proposed Reach 2

Exhibit I - Site Photographs
•
•
Photo #5: Facing upstream at upstream limits of proposed Reach 1
Photo #6: Horse Branch floodplain downstream of Reach 5

• Exhibit I - Site Photographs
•
Photo #7: Facing downstream showing stream bank soil profile
Photo #8: Facing drift lines after storm event on proposed Reach 3

Exhibit I - Site Photographs
0
Photo #9: Facing upstream at confined flow path causing erosion from existing field
•
•

Legend
Hudson Property
Reference Reach
v
ter"
Tl J{ l+
CN N�
(J
�x� - '��rLaerza�r C�krq'sa'tr- 4�•t++�t
i.
ell
000
r.
a
x
x
,u wt NR qua n€r �a
wo €ne Ne Nemaa sue No N}e -.roav
' I a riot NM !ki Nill YnM isP m xJtm aN kNt NR tiA S�^" i �� .
P
ivR NR Nei N% N PaR Np f'R
S1
i
M
n
WashE "y n
Mm ,
i
N �a
HUDSON PROPERTY
0 4 8 16��,��€ €
u'. a �� r NF• row
a
Miles � � `�
© OpenStr6etMap (and) coritnuutors, CC -8Y-SA
=
ALBEMARLE RESTORATIONS, LLC EXHIBIT J SCALE: 1 inch 12 miles
HUDSON PROPERTY �.
WETLAND RESTORATION, EEP# 004638
STREAM RESTORATION, REFERENCE REACH TAR - PAMLICO RIVER BASIN
& WILDLIFE HABITAT CREATION
VICINITY MAP CHOCOWINITY CREEK TLW rosys tell]
P.O. BOX 176 FAIRFIELD, NC 27826 HUC: 03020104010010
(252)333 -0249 FAX [phone]

U
APPENDIX A
SITE PROTECTION INSTRUMENT(S)
•

•
I�
LJ
ex1759PG276
FOR REGISTRATION REGISTER OF DEEDS
Jennifer Leggett Whitehurst
Beaufort County, NC
Augus t 15, 2011 12:36: 59
Book 1759 Page 276 -279
FEE: $23.00
INSTRUMENT # 2011004171
PURCHASE OPTION AGREEMENT
THIS PURCHASE OPTION dated July 26, 2011, is given by Charles E. Hudson (hereinafter
referred to as "SELLER ") to Albemarle Restorations, LLC (hereinafter referred to as "AGENT ").
SELLER is the owner of one parcel of real property located in Beaufort County, North Carolina,
(hereinafter referred to as "PROPERTY ") that is identified as PIN # 12024438, totaling 106.51 acres in the
Beaufort County Tax Office and Deed Book 1650, Page 0079, Map Sheet 566200 in the Beaufort County
Register of Deeds.
AGENT desires to obtain an option to purchase the right to restore, enhance and/or create up to
2,700 linear feet of streams and their associated wetlands, not to exceed a combine total of 15 acres but no
less than 12 acres on the PROPERTY for mitigation and/or habitat conservation purposes, and to secure the
protection in perpetuity of said streams and associated wetlands through the recordation of a conservation
easement by the SELLER in the Land Records of Beaufort County, North Carolina, on the terms set forth
below.
• In consideration of the sum'of ONE DOLLAR ($1.00) paid by the AGENT to the SELLER, and for
other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the

• A1759PC277
parties agree to the following:
1. Grant of Option. SELLER grants to AGENT first option to purchase the right to restore,
enhance and/or create up to 2,700 feet of streams and their associated wetlands, not to exceed a combine
total of 15 acres but no less than 12 acres on the PROPERTY for mitigation and/or habitat conservation
purposes, and to secure the protection in perpetuity of said streams through the recordation of a
conservation easement by the SELLER in the Land Records of Beaufort County, North Carolina, subject
to the terms and conditions set forth below. The AGENT may exercise this option to purchase the rights
and conservation easement(s) on the PROPERTY in varying amounts over the time frame of this option
agreement. In the event of acceptance of this Option in part or in total by AGENT, SELLER agrees as
follows:
a. That SELLER will allow AGENT, its subcontractors, employees, agents or assigns, the right
• to enter in and upon the PROPERTY to proceed with construction of the necessary stream
restoration, enhancement and/or creation including, but not limited to, analyzing, collection of
data, surveying and constructing and planting of mitigation site(s).
b. That SELLER will allow AGENT, its subcontractors, employees or agents or assigns, the right to
enter in and upon the PROPERTY at reasonable times and upon reasonable advance notice for a
period of seven (7) years from the date of completion of the mitigation to inspect, construct,
replant, replace, maintain and repair the mitigation site. AGENT will save and hold SELLER
harmless from damages associated with AGENT'S performance of the design, construction, and
monitoring of the proposed stream mitigation project on the PROPERTY, until such time as the
mitigation project has been approved as successful and complete by the North Carolina
Ecosystem Enhancement Program (NC EEP) or their assigns.
• 2. Time. The AGENT'S option to purchase the easement(s) must be exercised in writing by AGENT on or
before March 4, 2013. If the option to purchase is not exercised on or before that date, this option to

FKi.` 59rG278.
purchase shall automatically cease and terminate, neither party shall have any further rights hereunder, at
law or in equity, and this Agreement shall be null and void, all without further action or documentation by
either party.
3. Manner. The AGENT shall deliver to the SELLER written intent to exercise this option once the
property is accepted.by the NC EEP or their assigns, together with the Conservation Easement set forth in
Exhibit A. SELLER shall then execute and deliver the Conservation Easement to the AGENT for review
by the State of North Carolina (STATE). Once approved by the STATE, the AGENT shall record the
Conservation Easement and be reimbursed by the NC EEP, at which time the exchange of purchase monies
between SELLER and AGENT shall take place at an agreed upon time and place. The purchase price
under this option shall be Ten Thousand Dollars ($ 10,000.00) per acre. The actual number of acres
purchased shall be determined by survey. The failure of the SELLER to execute and return a fully executed
• copy of the Conservation Easement to the AGENT shall not affect the enforceability of this Agreement and
this Agreement shall be binding upon and enforceable against the SELLER. The AGENT is solely
responsible for all costs associated with the survey, transfer and recording of said Conservation Easement.
4. Rights and Obligations of the Parties if the Option is Exercised. In the event that AGENT
exercises this option to purchase within the time and in the manner herein before provided, then thereafter
the rights and obligations of the parties with respect to the Conservation Easement shall be governed by the
terms and conditions contained in the Conservation Easement.
5. Time of the Essence. Time shall be of the essence of this Option Agreement.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF the parties have duly executed this Agreement and affixed their seals as of
the date set forth above.
SELLER/
• B :
Charles E. Hudson

•
AGENT:
Albemarle Restorations, LLC
By: \ (SEAL)
Edmund R. Temple, Jr. member /manager
DK1 7 59IP c279
HEATHER FINCH
Notary Public
Beaufort 'Oo.. North Carolina
M, Commission Expires June 4, 2013
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA,
COUNTY OF
I, l Vi y) , a Notary Public for said County and State, do hereby
certify that Charles E. udson personally appeared before me this day and acknowledged the due
execution of the foregoing instrument.
Witness my hand and official seal, this the day of
My Commission expires: LL L 2 C')13
Notary Pu lic
STATE OF NO 'H CAROLINA,
COUNTY OF
I, \—' 'C� -:P-1/ 4-114 C,0 , a Notary Public for said County and State, do hereby
certify that Edmund R. Temple, Jr., a member /manager of Albemarle Restorations, LLC, a limited
liability company, personally appeared before we this day and acknowledged the due execution of the
foregoing instrument on behalf of the company.
Witness my hand and official seal, this the 0 (94-"day of ��
My Commission expires: b-
Notary Public
HEATHER FINCH
Notary Public
Beaufort Co., North Carolina
M� Commission Expires June 4, 2013

1gy5Pyc150
0
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
BEAUFORT COUNTY
SPO File Number 07 -U
Prepared by: Office of the Attorney General
Property Control Section
Return to: NC Department of Administration
State Property Office
1321- Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699 -1321
FOR REGIsiRPTION REGISTER OF DEEDS
Jennifer Leggett Whitehurst
Beaufort County, NC
May 09, 2014 11:44:58 AM
Book 1845 Page 150 -159
FEE: $26 00
NC REVENUE STAMP: $270.00
INSTRUMENT # 2014002057
CONSERVATION EASEMENT
PROVIDED PURSUANT TO•
FULL DELIVERY
MITIGATION CONTRACT
THIS CONSERVATION EASEMENT DEED, made this 9th -day of
May , 2014, by Justin Trent Hill, ( "Grantor "), whose inailing ,address is 2687
Haw Branch'Road, Chocowinity, NC 27817, to the State of North Carolina, ( "Grantee"), whose
mailing address is State of North Carolina, Department of Administration; &ate Property Office,
1321 Mail -Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699 -1321. The designations of Grantor and Grantee
as used herein shall include said parties, their heirs, successors, and assigns, and shall include
singular, plural, masculine, feminine, or neuter as required by context.
WITNESSETH:
WHEREAS, pursuant to the provisions of N.C. Gen. Stat. § 143-214.8 et seq., the State
of North Carolina has established the Ecosystem Enhancement Program (formerly known as the
Wetlands Restoration Program) within the Department 'of Environment and Natural Resources
for the purposes of acquiring, maintaining, restoring, enhancing, creating and preserving wetland
and riparian resources that contribute to the protection. and improvement of water quality, flood
prevention, fisheries, aquatic habitat, wildlife habitat, and recreational opportunities; and
WHEREAS, this Conservation Easement from Grantor to Grantee has been negotiated,
arranged and provided for as a condition of a full delivery contract between Albemarle
Restorations, LLC, PO 'Box 176, Fairfield, NC 27826 and the North Carolina'-Department of
Environment and Natural Resources, to provide stream, wetland and/or buffer mitigation
pursuant to the North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources Purchase and
Services Contract Number'004638.
•

�18 '� 5 ?.1 5
WHEREAS, The State of North Carolina is qualified to be the Grantee of a Conservation
• Easement pursuant to N. C; Gen: Stat. § 121 -35; and
WHEREAS, the Department of Environment and Natural Resources, the North Carolina
Department of Transportation and the United States Army Corps of Engineers, Wilmington
District entered into a Memorandum of Agreement, (MOA) duly executed by all parties in
Greensboro, NC on July 22, 2003, which recognizes that the Ecosystem Enhancement Program
is to provide for compensatory mitigation by effective protection of the land, water and natural
resources of the State by restoring, enhancing and preserving ecosystem functions; and
WHEREAS, the acceptance of this instrument for and on behalf of the State of North
Carolina was granted to the Department of Administration by resolution• as approved -by the
Governor 'and Council of State adopted at a meeting held in the City of Raleigh, "North Carolina,
on the 80' day of February 2000; and
WHEREAS, the Ecosystem- Enhancement Program in the Department.of Environment
and Natural Resources, which has been delegated the authority authorized by the Governor and
Council of State to the . Department of Administration, has approved acceptance of this
instrument; and
WHEREAS, Grantor owns in fee simple certain real property situated, lying, and being
in Chocowinity Township, Beaufort County, North Carolina (the "Property"), and being more
particularly described as that certain parcel of land containing approximately 13.499 acres and
being conveyed to the "Grantor by deed as recorded in Deed Book 1790 at "Page .204 of the
• Beaufort County Registry, North Carolina; and
WHEREAS, Grantor is willing to grant a Conservation "Easement over the herein
described areas of the Property, thereby restricting and limiting the use of the included areas of
'the Property to the terms and conditions and purposes hereinafter set forth, and Grantee is willing
to accept such Conservation Easement. This Conservation Easement shall ' be for the ,protection
and benefit of Horse Branch, a tributary of Chocowinity Creek.
•
NOW, TIiEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants,.- terms, 'coAditions, and
restrictions hereinafter set forth, Grantor unconditionally and irrevocably hereby grants and
conveys .unto Grantee, its successors and assigns, forever and in perpetuity, a Conservation
Easement along with a general Right of Access.
The Easement Area consists of the following:
Tracts Numbers I & 2 containing a total of 13.499 acres as shown on the plats of survey entitled
"Final" Plat, Conservation Easement for the State of North Carolina, Ecosystem Enhancement
Program, Hudson Project, SPO File No. 07 -U, EEP Site No 95361, Property of Justin Trent
Hill," dated December 28, 2013 by True Line Surveying, P.C. PLS Number L -3990 and recorded
in the Beaufort County, North Carolina Register of Deeds at Plan Cabinet - = slide
1tc- g

B-1845.9152
See attached "Ezhibit A "; Legal Description of area of the Property hereinafter referred to as the
•
"Easement Area"
The purposes of this Conservation Easement are to maintain, restore, enhance, construct,
create and preserve wetland and/or riparian resources in the Easement Area that contribute to the
protection and improvement of water quality, flood prevention, fisheries, aquatic habitat, wildlife
habitat, and recreational opportunities; to maintain permanently the Easement Area in its natural
condition, consistent with these purposes; and to prevent any use of the Easement Area that will
significantly impair or interfere with these purposes. To achieve these purposes, the following
condition's and restrictions are set forth:
I. DURATION OF EASEMENT
Pursuant- to law, - including the above referenced statutes, this Conservation Easement-and
Right of Access shall be perpetual and it shall run -with, and'be a. continuing restriction --upon the
use of, the -Property, and it shall be enforceable by the Grantee against the Grantor and against
Grantor's heirs, successors and assigns, personal representatives, agents, lessees, and licensees.
II. GRANTOR- RESERVED USES AND RESTRICTED' ACTIVITES
The Easement Area shall be restricted from any development or usage that would impair
or interfere with the purposes of this Conservation Easement. Unless 'expressly reserved as a
compatible use herein, any activity in, or use of, the Easement Area by the 'Grantor is prohibited
as inconsistent with the purposes of this Conservation Easement. Any rights not expressly
reserved hereunder by the Grantor have been acquired by the Grantee. Any rights riot expressly
reserved hereunder by the Grantor, including the rights to all mitigation credits, including, but
not limited to, stream, wetland, and riparian buffer mitigation units, derived from each site within
the area -'of the Conservation Easement, are conveyed. to and belong to -the Grantee. Without
limiting the generality of the foregoing, the following specific uses are prohibited, restricted, or
reserved as indicated:
A. Recreational Uses. Grantor expressly reserves the -right to undeveloped recreational
uses, including hiking, bird watching, hunting and fishing, and access to the Easement Area for
the purposes thereof.
B. Motorized Vehicle Use. Motorized vehicle use in the Easement Area is prohibited.
C. Educational Uses. The Grantor reserves the right to engage in and - permit others to
engage in educational uses in the Easement -Area not inconsistent with this Conservation
Easement, acid the right of access to the Easement Area for such purposes including organized
educational activities such as site visits'and observations. -Educational uses of the property shall
not alter vegetation, hydrology or topography of the site.
D. Vegetative Cutting. Except as related to the removal of non - native plants, diseased or
damaged trees, or vegetation that destabilizes or renders unsafe the Easement Area to persons or
natural habitat, all cutting, - removal, mowing, harming, or destruction of any trees and vegetation
in the Easement Area is prohibited.
40

�1845?C153
E. Indiistr"ial;' Residential and Commercial Uses. All industrial, residential and
• . commercial uses are prohibited in the Easement Area.
F. Agricultural Use. All agricultural uses are prohibited within the Easement Area
including any use for cropland, waste lagoons, or pastureland.
G. New Construction. There shall be no building, facility, mobile home, antenna, utility
pale, tower, or other structure constructed or placed in the Easement Area.
H. Roads and Trails. There shall be no construction of roads, trails, walkways, or paving
in the Easement Area.
I. Signs. No signs shall be permitted in the Easement Area except interpretive signs
describing restoration activities and the conservation values of the Easement Area, signs
identifying the owner of the Property and the holder of the Conservation Easement, signs giving
directions, or signs prescribing rules and regulations for the use of the Easement Area.
I Dumping or Storing. Dumping or storage of soil, trash,. ashes; garbage, waste,
abandoned vehicles, appliances; machinery, or any other material in -the Easement Area is
prohibited.
K. -Grading; Mineral Use, Excavation, Dredging: There shall be no grading, filling,
excavation, dredging, mining, drilling; removal of topsoil; sand, gravel, rock, peat, minerals, or
other materials.
• L. Water Quality and Drainage Patterns. There shall be no diking, draining, dredging,
channeling, filling, leveling, pumping, impounding'or diverting, causing, allowing or permitting
the diversion of surface or underground water in the Easement Area. No altering or tarripering
with water control structures or devices, or disruption or alteration of the restored, enhanced, or
created drainage patterns is allowed. All removal of wetlands, polluting or discharging into
waters, springs, seeps, or wetlands, or use of pesticide or . biocides in the Easement Area is
prohibited. In the event of an emergency interruption or shortage of all other water sources,
water from within-the Easement Area may temporarily be used for good cause shown as needed
for the survival of livestock and agricultural production on the Property.
M. Subdivision and Conveyance. Grantor voluntarily agrees that no subdivision,
partitioning, or dividing of the underlying Property owned by the Grantor in fee simple ("fee ")
that is subject to this Easement is allowed.. Unless agreed to by the Grantee in writing, any future
conveyance of.the underlying fee and the rights conveyed herein shall be as a single block of
property. Any future transfer of the fee simple shall be subject to this Conservation Easement.
Any transfer of the fee is subject to the Grantee's right of unlimited and repeated ingress and
egress over and across the Property to the Easement Area for.the purposes set forth herein.
N. Development Rights. All development rights are permanently removed from the
Easement Area and are rion- transferrable.
4

X1845? 151
O. Disturbance of Natural Features. Any change, disturbance, alteration or impairment of
• the natural features of the Easement Area or any intentional introduction of non - native plants,
trees and/or animal species by Grantor is prohibited.
The Grantor may request permission to vary from the above restrictions for good cause
shown, provided that any such request is not inconsistent with the purposes of this Conservation
Easement, and the Grantor obtains advance written approval from the N.C. Ecosystem
Enhancement Program, whose mailing address is 1652 Mail Services Center, Raleigh, NC
27699 -1652.
III. GRANTEE RESERVED USES
A. , Right of Access, Construction, and Inspection. The Grantee, its employees and'agehts,
successors and assigns, receive a perpetual Right of Access to the Easement Area over the
Property at reasonable times to undertake any activities to restore, construct, manage, maintain,
enhance, and monitor the stream, wetland and any other riparian resources in the Easement Area,
in accordance with restoration activities or a long -term management plan. Unless otherwise
specifically set forth in this Conservation Easement, the rights granted herein do not include or
establish for the public any access rights.
B. Restoration Activities. These activities include planting of trees, shrubs and herbaceous
vegetation, installation of monitoring wells, utilization of heavy equipment to grade, fill, and
prepare the soil, modification of the hydrology of the site, and. installation of natural and
manmade; materials as needed to direct in- stream, above ground, and gubterraneous water -flow.
• C. Signs. The Grantee, its employees and agents, successors or assigns, shall be permitted
to- place signs and witness ,posts -on the .Property to include 'any or all of the following: describe
the project, prohibited activities within the Conservation Easement, or identify the project
boundaries and the holder of the Conservation Easement.
D. Fences. The Grantee, its employees and agents, successors or assigns; shall be permitted
to place fencing on the Property to restrict livestock access. Although .the Grantee is not
responsible for fence maintenance, the Grantee reserves the right to repair the fence, at its sole
discretion:
IV. ENFORCEMENT AND REMEDIES
A. Enforcement. To accomplish the purposes of this Conservation Easement, Grantee is
allowed to prevent any activity within the Easement Area that is inconsistent with the purposes
of this Easement and to require the restoration of such areas or features in the Easement Area
that may have been damaged by such unauthorized activity or use. Upon any breach of the terms
of this Conservation Easement by Grantor, the Grantee shall, except as provided below, notify
the Grantor- in-writing of such breach and the Grantor shall have ninety (90) days. after receipt of
such notice to correct the damage caused by such breach. If the breach and damage remains
uncured after ninety (90) days, the Grantee may enforce this Conservation Easement by bringing
• appropriate legal proceedings including an action to recover damages, as well as injunctive and
5

189SP,G155
other relief. The Grantee shall also have the power and authority, consistent with its statutory
• authority': (a) to prevent any impairment of the Easement Area by acts which may be unlawful
or in violation of this Conservation Easement; (b) to otherwise preserve or protect its interest in
the Property; or (c) to seek damages from any appropriate person or entity. Notwithstanding the
foregoing, the Grantee reserves the immediate right, without notice, to obtain a temporary
restraining order, injunctive or other appropriate relief, if the breach is or would irreversibly or
otherwise materially impair the benefits to be derived from this Conservation Easement, and the
Grantor and Grantee acknowledge that the damage would be irreparable and remedies at law
inadequate. The rights and remedies of the Grantee provided hereunder shall be in addition to,
.and not in lieu of, all other rights and remedies available to Grantee in connection with this
Conservation Easement.
B. Inspection. The Grantee, its employees and agents, successors and assigns, have the
right, with reasonable notice, to enter the Easement Area over the Property at reasonable times
for the purpose of inspection to determine whether the Grantor is complying with the terms,
conditions and restrictions of this Conservation Easement.
C. Acts Beyond Grantor's Control. Nothing contained in this-'Conservation Easement
shall be construed to entitle Grantee to bring any action against Grantor for any injury or change
in the Easement Area caused by third parties, resulting from causes beyond the Grantor's control,
including, without limitation, fire, flood, storm, and earth movement, or from any prudent action
taken in good faith by the Grantor under emergency conditions to prevent, abate, or mitigate
significant injury to life; or damage to the Property resulting from such causes.
• D. Costs of Enforcement. Beyond regular and typical monitoring expenses, any costs
incurred by Grantee in enforcing the terms of this Conservation Easement against Grantor,
including, without limitation, any costs of restoration necessitated by Grantor's acts or omissions
in violation of the terms of this Conservation Easement, shall be borne by Grantor.
•
E. No Waiver; Enforcement of this Easement shall be at the discretion of the Grantee and
any forbearance, delay or omission by Grantee to exercise its rights hereunder in the event of any
breach of any term set forth herein shall not be construed to be a waiver b�y Grantee.
V. MISCELLANEOUS
A. This instrument sets forth the entire agreement of the parties with respect to the
Conservation Easement and supersedes all prior discussions, negotiations, understandings or
agreements relating to the Conservation Easement. If any provision is found to be invalid, the
remainder of the provisions of the Conservation Easement, and the application of such-provision
to persons or circumstances other than those as to which it is found to be invalid, shall not be
affected thereby.
B. Grantor is responsible for any real estate taxes, assessments, fees, or charges levied upon
the Property. Grantee shall not be responsible for any costs or liability of any kind related to the
ownership, operation, insurance, upkeep, or maintenance of the Property, except as expressly
provided herein. Upkeep of any constructed bridges, fences, or other amenities on the Property
are the sole responsibility of the Grantor, Nothing herein shall relieve the Grantor of the
In

In 1845 'Pd 156
obligation to:coinply with federal, state or local laws, regulations and permits-that may apply to
• the exercise of the Reserved Rights.
C. Any notices shall be sent by registered or certified mail, return receipt requested to the
parties at their addresses shown herein or to other addresses as either party establishes in writing
upon notification to the other.
D. Grantor shall notify Grantee in writing of the name and address and any party to whom
the Property or any part thereof is to be transferred at or prior to the time said transfer is made.
Grantor further agrees that any subsequent lease, deed, or other legal instrument by which any
interest in "the Property is conveyed subject to the Conservation Easement herein created.
E. The Grantor and Grantee agree that the terms of this Conservation Easement shall survive
any merger of the fee and easement interests in the Property or any portion thereof.
F. This Conservation Easement and Right of Access may be amended, but only in writing
signed by all parties hereto; or their successors or assigns, if such amendment does not affect the
qualification of this Conservation Easement or the status of the Grantee under any applicable
laws, and, is consistent - with the purposes of the "Conservation Easement. The owner of the
Property shalt notify the U:S. Army Corps of Engineers in writing sixty (60) days prior to the
initiation of any transfer of all or any part of the Property. Such notification shall be addressed
to: Justin'McCorkle, General Counsel, US Army Corp_ s of Engineers, 69 Darlington Avenue,
Wilmington, NC 28403
• G. The parties recognize and agree that the benefits of this Conservation Easement are in
gross and assignable provided, however, that the Grantee hereby covenants and agrees, that in
the event it transfers or assigns this Conservation Easement, the organization receiving the
interest will ' be a qualified holder under N.C. Gen. Stat. § 121 -34 et seq. and § 170(h) of the
Internal Revenue Code, and the Grantee further covenants and agrees that the terms of the
transfer or, assignment will -be such that the transferee or assignee will be required to continue in
perpetuity; the conservation purposes described in this document.
0
VI. QUIET ENJOYMENT
Grantor reserves all remaining rights accruing from ownership of the Property,' including
the right to engage in or permit or ihVite others to engage in only those uses of the Easement
Area that are expressly reserved herein, not prohibited or restricted herein, and are not
inconsistent with the purposes of this Conservation Easement. Without-limiting the generality of
the foregoing, the Grantor expressly, reserves to the Grantor, and the Grantor's invitees and
licensees, the right of access to the Easement Area,_ and the right of quiet enjoyment of the
Easement Area
TO HAVE AND TO HOLD, the said rights and easements perpetually onto the State of
North Carolina for the aforesaid purposes.
AND Grantor covenants that Grantor is seized of said premises in fee and has the right to
convey the permanent Conservation Easement herein granted; that the same is free from
7

n
L.J
•
91845P6157
encumbrances and that Grantor will warrant and defend title to the same against the claims of all
persons whomsoever.
IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, the Grantor has hereunto set his hand and seal,'the day
and year first above written.
NORTH CAROLINA
COUNTY OF BEAUMRT
(SEAL)
I, William P,. -kayo;. Jr: _ a Notary Public in and for the County and State
aforesaid,, do hereby certify that Justin Trent Hill, Grantor, personally appeared before me this
day and acknowledged the execution of the foregoing instrument.
IN
da,
My commission expires:
8 -20 -2017
my hand and Notary Seal this the 9th
,9,g0i�0506i?8"eirl
MAYO
BAR
PUSOC'
�o
ss,�{1,���
ORT Co ,"o
8

1845PG158
Albemarle Restorations
Hudson Project
Town of Chocowinity, Beaufort County, North Carolina
Area #1 of Restoration
Commencing at a point, said point being an iron pipe found along the northern right -of-
way of Possum Track Road (SR 1127) in the Town of Chocowinity, Beaufort County,
North Carolina. Said point also being the southeastern corner of the Robert Lee Clark
property as recorded in Deed Book 871 Page 613, Beaufort County Registry and also -the
southwestern corner of the Charlie C. Clark property as recorded in Deed Book 04E Page
261. Thence from said point, leaving the northern right -of -way of Possum Tract Road in
a northerly direction a bearing and distance of N 25 °42'52" E 209.86 feet to an iron pipe
found:, Said point being the northeastern corner of the aforementioned Robert Lee Clark
property as a southeastern corner of the Justin Trent Hill property (which is the subject
property) as recorded in Deed Book 1790 Page 204. Thence a bearing and distance of
N 66 03'1'04" W 210.35 feet to an iron pipe found. Said point being the northwestern
corner of the aforementioned Robert Lee Clark property. Thence a bearing and -distance
of N 45624'53" E 617,50 feet to a point and the POINT OF BEGINNING: Thence the
following bearings and distances: N 35 °16'25" W 203.54 feet to a point, N 51 °47' 17" W
217,34 feet to a point, S 08 °50'07" W 205.80 feet to a point, S 57 052'54" W 231.17 feet
to a point, N 28-50'15" W 200.06 feet, N 37-46'13" E 200.18 feet to a point,
N 03 °09'51" W 350.66 feet to a point, N 14 °21'42" E 320.22 feet to a point,
• S 69016'00" E 353.99 feet to a point, S 57'05'15" E 201.62 feet to a point,
S 85 022'40" E 250.39 feet to a point, S 27 °35'38" W 219.69 feet to a point,
S 89 °21'22" W 200.19 feet to a point, N 63 °2843" W 369.41 feet to a point,
S 22 °3.1,'36" E 202.66 feet to a point, S 64 °17'59" E 203.25 feet to a point,
S 39 °29'22" E 246.09 feet to a point, S 25 °58'43" W 240.15 feet to a point and the
POINT OF BEGINNING and containing 9154 acres (429261 square feet) according to
a plat by True Line Surveying, P.-C. entitled "Conservation Easement Survey for The
State of North Carolina Hudson Project ", Contract Number 0046348, •EPP Project / Case
Number 95361, dated December 19, 2013.
•

91845'4159
Albemarle Restorations
Hudson Project
Town of Chocowinity, Beaufort County, North Carolina
Area #2 of Restoration
Commencing at a point, said point being an iron pipe found along the northern right -of-
way of Possum Track Road ,(SR 1127) in the Town of Chocowinity, Beaufort County,
North Carolina. Said -point also being the southeastern corner of the Robert Lee Clark
property as recorded in Deed Book'871 Page 613, Beaufort County Registry and also the
southwestern corner of the Charlie C. Clark property as recorded in Deed Book 04$ Page
261. Thence from said point along the right -of -way of Possum Track Road a bearing and
distance of N 66 °29'48" W 210.74 feet to an iron pipe found. Said point -being a southern
property corner of the Justin Trent'Hill property (which is the subject property) m
recorded in Deed Book 1790 Page 204. Thence a bearing and distance of N 66 032'09" W
187.45 feet to an iron pipe found. Said point also being the southeastern corner of the
Blanch G. Hudson property as recorded in Deed Book -876 Page 891. Thence leaving the
northern:right =of- -way of Possum Track Road in a northerly direction a bearing and
distance of N 22 056'52" E 152.00 feet to an iron pipe-set. Thence a bearing and distance
of N 67 °03'08" W 174:35 feet to an iron pipe set. Thence a bearing and-distance of
N 14°31'39" E 1726.01 feet to,an iron pipe set. Thence a- bearingand distance of
N 38 000'47" W 557.99 feet to an iron pipe set. Said point also being the northwestern
corner, of the Blanche G. Hudson property as recorded in.Deed Book 9844 Page301.
Thence a bearing and distance of 'S 25 °13'41" W 269.31 feet to a point and-the POINT
OF BEGINNING. Thence the following bearings and distances: S 21'45'18" W 246.15
feet to a point, N41 °24'17" W 206.53 feet to a point, N 26639'35"'W 494.16 feet to a
point; 'N 51 °04'43" E 44.20 feet to a point, N 42 053142" E 63.27 feet to a point,
N 31033'59" E 79.446 feet to a point, N 25 °07'36" E 65.81 feet to a point,
N 23602'26" E 67.58 feet to a point, S 16 °44'35" E 276.33 feet to a point,
S 31019'49" E 214.74 feet to a point, S 24 °38'29" E 202.21 feet to a point. and-the
POINT.OF BEGINNING and containing 3.645 acres (158762 square feet) according to
a plat by True Line "Surveying; P.C: entitled "Conservation Easement Survey -for The
State of North Carolina Hudson Project ", Contract Number 0046348, EPP -Project / Case
Number 95361, dated December 19, 2013.
Is

•
•
•
I
xr 6�KW�3t' k�5 t #r�� I
Z
�e
4 I
30 y
jmz
3 °a
l I'?
ul O1� u'
n ..
Gym
Z O v N
Gm,
vine
an°
w n ri 1
\Z I
O M N
N � ,
10
ul
1-m-iiimiiiiiiiii
low)
O w U
-
�Wano�
z N ^ O
0811111111111
�mZ °o
_
Jill III Jill 111
ga
WMNU Z
Z =
1
K N -
=O�ib 1
m'ay
O�"no m
m °a I
II ,
-
�O� 1
1
,
z
D
K
O 1
1
IN
loll
HIM
g��
Nn
I
Loinuillimilill
Il I
I��ae
__- J
JO10
r 1
1 1
1 a
rm
m ,
0
1
_ � 1• �.,�
>r
= N O
wwa� a�e wm�
m
Z,��
z N
Nm = 1 Z3mN
\\ wipe. YOZ
a
e
zn
O
a _
frll O'f4/1 � _
n s
o °rn� to
a
i
€gin
IS �+ riJC 01 G1 U
n w N m
�
2UO N
CV♦ M _
Nzw
woz°i
3�0
o � v)SaQ a
V
T
3 A � 04
�W_ I �• n~• n F Z
-,W0
- boa k k n
Z
.,
C mJ?
z m:
0 Z
e 3` ya
f cgiN� vo., i �O
to
� zw« �s�z CrW�4o
t-
3 am 5 ai
z - i
W�� I
�OZ
SR 1127 1" (PUBUC)
`'sf_�
POSSUM
_nsr
o+e:
I
I�
�J
low)
O w U
-
�Wano�
z N ^ O
�mZ °o
_
'OK
ga
rm
m ,
0
1
_ � 1• �.,�
>r
= N O
wwa� a�e wm�
m
Z,��
z N
Nm = 1 Z3mN
\\ wipe. YOZ
a
e
zn
O
a _
frll O'f4/1 � _
n s
o °rn� to
a
i
€gin
IS �+ riJC 01 G1 U
n w N m
�
2UO N
CV♦ M _
Nzw
woz°i
3�0
o � v)SaQ a
V
T
3 A � 04
�W_ I �• n~• n F Z
-,W0
- boa k k n
Z
.,
C mJ?
z m:
0 Z
e 3` ya
f cgiN� vo., i �O
to
� zw« �s�z CrW�4o
t-
3 am 5 ai
z - i
W�� I
�OZ
SR 1127 1" (PUBUC)
`'sf_�
POSSUM
_nsr
o+e:
I
I�
�J
ga
WMNU Z
Z =
1
K N -
=O�ib 1
m'ay
O�"no m
m °a I
II ,
-
�O� 1
1
,
z
D
K
O 1
1
1 y
y N
g��
Nn
I
Il I
I��ae
__- J
JO10
r 1
1 1
1 a
1
Z J
11 O
J 1
1
Qmv' \
\ �
�3vn 1
1
VIZ
m ,
0
1
_ � 1• �.,�
>r
= N O
wwa� a�e wm�
m
Z,��
z N
Nm = 1 Z3mN
\\ wipe. YOZ
a
e
zn
O
a _
frll O'f4/1 � _
n s
o °rn� to
a
i
€gin
IS �+ riJC 01 G1 U
n w N m
�
2UO N
CV♦ M _
Nzw
woz°i
3�0
o � v)SaQ a
V
T
3 A � 04
�W_ I �• n~• n F Z
-,W0
- boa k k n
Z
.,
C mJ?
z m:
0 Z
e 3` ya
f cgiN� vo., i �O
to
� zw« �s�z CrW�4o
t-
3 am 5 ai
z - i
W�� I
�OZ
SR 1127 1" (PUBUC)
`'sf_�
POSSUM
_nsr
o+e:
I
I�
�J
>r
= N O
wwa� a�e wm�
m
Z,��
z N
Nm = 1 Z3mN
\\ wipe. YOZ
a
e
zn
O
a _
frll O'f4/1 � _
n s
o °rn� to
a
i
€gin
IS �+ riJC 01 G1 U
n w N m
�
2UO N
CV♦ M _
Nzw
woz°i
3�0
o � v)SaQ a
V
T
3 A � 04
�W_ I �• n~• n F Z
-,W0
- boa k k n
Z
.,
C mJ?
z m:
0 Z
e 3` ya
f cgiN� vo., i �O
to
� zw« �s�z CrW�4o
t-
3 am 5 ai
z - i
W�� I
�OZ
SR 1127 1" (PUBUC)
`'sf_�
POSSUM
_nsr
o+e:
I
I�
�J
e
zn
O
a _
frll O'f4/1 � _
n s
o °rn� to
a
i
€gin
IS �+ riJC 01 G1 U
n w N m
�
2UO N
CV♦ M _
Nzw
woz°i
3�0
o � v)SaQ a
V
T
3 A � 04
�W_ I �• n~• n F Z
-,W0
- boa k k n
Z
.,
C mJ?
z m:
0 Z
e 3` ya
f cgiN� vo., i �O
to
� zw« �s�z CrW�4o
t-
3 am 5 ai
z - i
W�� I
�OZ
SR 1127 1" (PUBUC)
`'sf_�
POSSUM
_nsr
o+e:
I
I�
�J
SR 1127 1" (PUBUC)
`'sf_�
POSSUM
_nsr
o+e:
I
I�
�J
I
I�
�J

•
•
APPENDIX B
BASELINE INFORMATION DATA

9 0
•
•
Categorical Exclusion Form for Ecosystem Enhancement
Program Projects
Version 1.4
Note: Only,Appendix A should to b_e.submitted (along,with any supporting, documentation) as, the
�environmental document.-
Part 1 Project •
•
Project Name: Hudson Property
County Name: Beaufort County
EEP Number: 95361
Pro�ect Sponsor: Albemarle Restorations, LLC
Project Contact Name: Edmund Temple
Project Contact Address: P.O. Box 176 Fairfield, NC 27826
Project Contact E -mail: [e-mail]
EEP Project Manager: Heather Smith
Project Description
The project will provide up to 2,700 SMUs to unnamed tributaries of Horse Branch in the Chocowinity Creek targeted
local' watershed (Catalog Unit: 03020104010010).
For - Only
Reviewed By:.
d
Date
EEP Project Manager
Conditional Approved By :,
Date
For Division Administrator
FHWA
❑ Check this box if there are outstanding issues
Final Approval By:
Date
or Division Administrator
FHWA
Version 1.4, 8/18/05

•
•
r1
LJ
Part 2: All Projects
Response
Coastal Zone Management Act CZMA '
1. Is the project located in a CAMA county?
❑✓ Yes
❑ No
2. Does the project involve ground- disturbing activities within a CAMA Area of
❑ Yes
Environmental Concern (AEC)?
❑✓ No
❑ N/A
3. Has a CAMA permit been secured?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑✓ N/A
4. Has NCDCM agreed that the project is consistent with the NC Coastal Management
❑ Yes
Program?
❑ No
❑N/A
i' Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabilit Act CERCLA
1. Is this a "full- delivery" project?
✓❑ Yes
❑ No
2. Has the zoning /land use of the subject property and adjacent properties ever been
❑ Yes
designated as commercial or industrial?
❑✓ No
❑ N/A
3. As a result of a limited Phase I Site Assessment, are there known or potential
❑ Yes
hazardous waste sites within or adjacent to the project area?
❑Q No
❑ N/A
4. As a result of a Phase I Site Assessment, are there known or potential hazardous
❑ Yes
waste sites within or adjacent to the project area?
❑ No
[Z] N/A
5. As a result of a Phase II Site Assessment, are there known or potential hazardous
❑ Yes
waste sites within the project area?
❑ No
[Z] N/A
6. Is there an approved hazardous mitigation plan?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑✓ N/A
National Historic Preservation Act Section 106
1. Are there properties listed on, or eligible for listing on, the National Register of
El Yes
Historic Places in the project area?
[Z] No
2. Does the project affect such properties and does the SHPO /THPO concur?
❑ Yes
❑ No
[Z] N/A
3. If the effects are adverse, have they been resolved?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑✓ N/A
Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act Uniform
Act
1. Is this a "full- delivery" project?
✓ Yes
❑ No
2. Does the project require the acquisition of real estate?
❑✓ Yes
❑ No
❑ N/A
3. Was the property acquisition completed prior to the intent to use federal funds?
❑ Yes
❑✓ No
❑ N/A
4. Has the owner of the property been informed:
❑✓ Yes
• prior to making an offer that the agency does not have condemnation authority; and
❑ No
• what the fair market value is believed to be?
❑ N/A
Version 1.4, 8/18/05

11
•
•
Part 3: Ground-Disturbing
. ..
1j American Indian Religious Freedom Act AIRFA
1. Is the project located in a county claimed as "territory" by the Eastern Band of ❑ Yes
Cherokee Indians? [Z] No
2. Is the site of religious importance to American Indians?
❑ Yes
❑ No
0 N/A
3. Is the project listed on, or eligible for listing on, the National Register of Historic
❑ Yes
Places?
❑ No
✓❑ N/A
4. Have the effects of the project on this site been considered?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑✓ N/A
Antiquities Act AA
1. Is the project located on Federal lands?
❑ Yes
E] No
2. Will there be loss or destruction of historic or prehistoric ruins, monuments or objects
❑ Yes
of antiquity?
❑ No
[Z] N/A
3. Will a permit from the appropriate Federal agency be required?
❑ Yes
❑ No
[Z] N/A
4. Has a permit been obtained?
❑ Yes
❑ No
0 N/A
I( "Archaeological Resources'Protection Act ARPA
1. Is the project located on federal or Indian lands (reservation)?
❑ Yes
❑✓ No
2. Will there be a loss or destruction of archaeological resources?
❑ Yes
❑ No
[Z] N/A
3. Will a permit from the appropriate Federal agency be required?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑✓ N/A
4. Has a permit been obtained?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑✓ N/A
i Endangered Species Act ESA
1. Are federal Threatened and Endangered species and /or Designated Critical Habitat
❑✓ Yes
listed for the county?
❑ No
2. Is Designated Critical Habitat or suitable habitat present for listed species?
❑ Yes
❑✓ No
❑ N/A
3. Are T &E species present or is the project being conducted in Designated Critical
❑ Yes
Habitat?
❑ No
[Z] N/A
4. Is the project "likely to adversely affect' the species and /or "likely to adversely modify"
❑ Yes
Designated Critical Habitat?
❑ No
✓❑ N/A
5. Does the USFWS /NOAA- Fisheries concur in the effects determination?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ N/A
6. Has the USFWS /NOAA- Fisheries rendered a "jeopardy" determination?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑✓ N/A
Version 1.4, 8/18/05

•
•
•
6 Executive Order 13007 Indian Sacred Sites
1. Is the project located on Federal lands that are within a county claimed as "territory"
❑ Yes
by the EBCI?
❑✓ No
2. Has the EBCI indicated that Indian sacred sites may be impacted by the proposed
❑ Yes
project?
❑ No
❑✓ N/A
3. Have accommodations been made for access to and ceremonial use of Indian sacred
❑ Yes
sites?
❑ No
❑✓ N/A
Farmland Protection Policy Act FPPA
1. Will real estate be acquired?
❑✓ Yes
❑ No
2. Has NRCS determined that the project contains prime, unique, statewide or locally
❑ Yes
important farmland?
❑ No
❑ N/A
3. Has the completed Form AD -1006 been submitted to NRCS?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑✓ N/A
t '`,`Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act FWCA
1. Will the project impound, divert, channel deepen, or otherwise control /modify any
❑ Yes
water body?
❑✓ No
2. Have the USFWS and the NCWRC been consulted?
❑ Yes
❑ No
✓❑ N/A
Land and Water Conservation Fund Act Section 6
1. Will the project require the conversion of such property to a use other than public,
❑ Yes
outdoor recreation?
❑✓ No
2. Has the NPS approved of the conversion?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑✓ N/A
liMa nuson- Stevens Fishe Conservation and Management Act Essential Fish
Habitat
1. Is the project located in an estuarine system?
❑ Yes
❑ No
2. Is suitable habitat present for EFH- protected species?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑N/A
3. Is sufficient design information available to make a determination of the effect of the
❑ Yes
project on EFH?
❑ No
❑✓ N/A
4. Will the project adversely affect EFH?
❑ Yes
❑ No
✓❑ N/A
5. Has consultation with NOAA- Fisheries occurred?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑✓ N/A
j; Miciratory Bird Treat Act MBTA
1. Does the USFWS have any recommendations with the project relative to the MBTA?
❑ Yes
[Z] No
2. Have the USFWS recommendations been incorporated?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑✓ N/A
Wilderness Act,
1. Is the project in a Wilderness area?
❑ Yes
[Z] No
2. Has a special use permit and /or easement been obtained from the maintaining
❑ Yes
federal agency?
❑ No
❑✓ N/A
Version 1.4, 8/18/05

•
n
U
Appendix A
Categorical Exclusion Forrri for Ecosystem Enhancement
Program Projects
Version 1A
Note:'Only Append=ix kshouidlo be submitted (along,,with any supporting, documentation) .as.the,
envi,,i6nmental document:'
Part
Project
1: Geberal •
•
Prdiect Name:
Hudson Property
County Name:
Beaufort County
EEP Number:
95361
Protect Sponsor:
Albemarle Restorations, LLC
Project Contact Name:
Edmund Temple
Project Contact Address:
P.O. Box 176 Fairfield, NC*27826
Project Contact E -mail:
edtemple @vol.com
C_
EEP Pro ect Mana er:
Heather smith
Project Description
The project will provide up to 2,700 SMUs to unnamed tributaries of Horse Branch in the Chocowinity Creek targeted
local watershed (Catalog Unit: 03020104010010).
For Official. Use Only
Redewed By.;
.
Date
-EEP Project Manager
Conditional Approved By:
Date
For Division Administrator
i .
FHWA
❑1 Check this box if there are outstanding issues,
Final Approval By:
3
4
Dale
or Division Administrator
FHWA
6 Version 1.4, 8/18/05

Albemarle R
Wetland Restoration
Stream Restoration
Wildlife Habitat
March 12, 2013
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Ecosystem Enhancement Program
ATTN'. Ms. Heather Smith
1652 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699 -1652
RE: Task 1, Coastal Zone Management Act Requirements
EEP Contract #004638, IMS# 95361
Hudson Property Site; Beaufort County, NC
Dear Heather:
Please find attached a revised Categorical Exclusion Form, page 7, regarding the Coastal
Zone Management Act (CZMA) question #4 for the above referenced project. A
nationwide permit #27 will be required for the project and based on the North Carolina
Department of Environment and Natural Resources (NCDENER), Division of Coastal
Management (DCM) consistency concurrence letter dated March 12, 2012, to the US
Army Corps of Engineers, Wilmington District, all 50 Nationwide permits are consistent
with North Carolina's Coastal Management Program. In the event that a nationwide
permit is not received for the mitigation project then an individual consistency
certification from NCDENR DCM will be provided.
Please call me at 252- 333 -0249 or e-mail at edtemple 21vol.com if you have any
questions or comments.
Sincerely,
Edmund R. Temple, Jr.
Principal
P.O. BOX 204
GATESVILLE, NC 27938
PHONE [phone]
FAX [phone]

• Albemarle Restorations, LLC
Weiland Restoration
Stream Restoration
Wildlife Habitat
January 16, 2013
Mr. John Hammond
Endangered Species Coordinator
US Fish and Wildlife Service, Raleigh Field Office
P.O. Box 33726
Raleigh, NC 27636 -3726
RE: Hudson Property Stream Mitigation Project (Beaufort County)
Threatened and Endangered Species Project Review
Dear Mr. Hammond,
This is a follow up letter which provides additional habitat analysis information and conclusions
on whether listed T &E species for Beaufort County will be affected by the proposed project.
The site is positioned on 15 acres of cropland located on a 106.51 acre farm within the northeast
quadrant of the intersection between Route 17 and Route 1127 (Possum Track Road) in
• Beaufort County, NC. The site is situated approximately 6 miles southeast of the Chocowinity
Bay and Pamlico River confluence and 4.4 miles north of the Beaufort and Craven County line.
The project contains natural headwater streams that have been extensively ditched and cleared
for agricultural production. Historical USDA photos show that the project site has been in
continuous crop production since 1938.
An updated T &E species list for Beaufort County with habitat analyses for each species based on
current on -site conditions is provided below.
We thank you in advance for your timely response and cooperation. Please feel free to contact
me at (252) 333 -0249 with any questions.
Since
Edmund R. Temple, Jr.
Principal
• P.O. BOX 176
FAIRFIELD, NC 27826
PHONE [phone]

•
•
Threatened and Endangered (T &E) Species List for Beaufort County
HABITAT ANALYSES
American eel
Atlantic eel is a catadromous fish found on the eastern coast of North America that lives in fresh
water and estuaries. Eels are bottom dwellers and hide in burrows, tubes, snags, masses of
plants, other types of shelters. They are found in a variety of habitats including streams, rivers,
and muddy or silt - bottomed lakes during their freshwater stage, as well as oceanic waters,
coastal bays and estuaries. Due to the proposed project's headwater location in the watershed
and existing conditions, there is no suitable habitat for this species. Therefore, a biological
conclusion of "No Effect" has been made.
Atlantic stur-geon
Atlantic sturgeon are anadromous fish that spawn in freshwater in the spring and early summer
and migrate into "estuarine" and marine waters where they spend most of their lives. In some
southern rivers a fall spawning migration may also occur. They spawn in moderately flowing
• water (46 -76 cm /s) in deep parts of large rivers. Sub - adults and adults live in coastal waters and
estuaries when not spawning, generally in shallow (10 -50 in depth) nearshore areas dominated
Federal
Record
Biological
Common Name
Scientific Name
Status
Status
I Conclusion
Vertebrates
American eel
Anguilla rostrata
FSC
Current
No Effect
Acipenser oxyrinchus
No Effect
Atlantic sturgeon
oxyrinchus
E
Current
Bald eagle
Holiaeetus leucocephalus .
BGPA
Current
No Effect
Black- throated green
Dendroica virens waynei
FSC
Current
No Effect
warbler
Carolina gopher frog
Rana capito capito
FSC
Historic
No Effect
Eastern Henslow's
Ammodramus henslowii
No Effect
FSC
Current
sparrow
susurrans
Kemp's (Atlantic)
No Effect
Lepidochelys kempii
E
Current
ridley sea Turtle
No Effect
Rafinesque's big -eared bat
Corynorhinus rafinesquii
FSC
Historic
Red wolf
Canis rufus
EXP
Current
No Effect
Red - cockaded
No Effect
Picoides borealis
E
Current
woodpecker
West Indian manatee
Trichechus manatus
E
Current
No Effect
Invertebrate: Vascular
Plant
Grassleaf arrowhead
Sagittaria weatherbiona
FSC
Historic
No Effect
Rough - leaved loosestrife
Lysimachia asperulaefolia
E
Historic
No Effect
Sensitive joint -vetch
A_ eschynomene virginica
T
Current
No Effect
Venus' fly -Trap
Dionaea muscipula
FSC
Current
No Effect
HABITAT ANALYSES
American eel
Atlantic eel is a catadromous fish found on the eastern coast of North America that lives in fresh
water and estuaries. Eels are bottom dwellers and hide in burrows, tubes, snags, masses of
plants, other types of shelters. They are found in a variety of habitats including streams, rivers,
and muddy or silt - bottomed lakes during their freshwater stage, as well as oceanic waters,
coastal bays and estuaries. Due to the proposed project's headwater location in the watershed
and existing conditions, there is no suitable habitat for this species. Therefore, a biological
conclusion of "No Effect" has been made.
Atlantic stur-geon
Atlantic sturgeon are anadromous fish that spawn in freshwater in the spring and early summer
and migrate into "estuarine" and marine waters where they spend most of their lives. In some
southern rivers a fall spawning migration may also occur. They spawn in moderately flowing
• water (46 -76 cm /s) in deep parts of large rivers. Sub - adults and adults live in coastal waters and
estuaries when not spawning, generally in shallow (10 -50 in depth) nearshore areas dominated

•
by gravel and sand substrates.Due to the proposed project's headwater location in the
watershed and existing conditions, there is no suitable habitat for this species. Therefore, a
biological conclusion of "No Effect" has been made.
Bald eagle
Bald eagles prefer the open water of lakes, rivers, and marshes for their foraging habitat, and
tall, mature trees for their nesting and roosting sites. The closer these habitats are together, the
greater the attraction is for Bald eagles. The project area is currently tilled cropland with several
degraded headwater streams (drainage ditches). Based on the habitat requirements and an
onsite review, there is no suitable habitat for Bald Eagles within the project area, therefore a
biological conclusion of "No Effect" has been made.
Black- throated green warbler
In southern Virginia and coastal North Carolina, black - throated green warblers are closely
dssociated with Atlantic white cedar. Where cedar is scarce or absent, such as coastal South
Carolina, these birds are found primarily in non - alluvial forested wetlands or transitional zones
between upland and wetland. Black- throated green warblers are sometimes found in small or
headwater riparian forests, but most observers suggest an association with forest stands
growing in non - alluvial muck swamp. The project area is currently tilled cropland with several
degraded headwater streams (drainage ditches). Based on the habitat requirements and an
onsite review, there is no suitable habitat for this species within the project area, therefore a
biological conclusion of "No Effect" has been made.
• Carolina gopher frog
these rare frogs occur at scattered localities in the Sandhills and southeastern Coastal Plain.
Little is known about their natural history outside the breeding season. Adults are secretive,
spending most of their lives underground. Gopher frogs derive their common name from the
fact that adults commonly use the burrows of the gopher tortoise (Gopherus polyphemus) as
hiding places in the Deep South, but in North Carolina (where these tortoises do not occur),
gopher frogs hide in stump holes, root tunnels and mammal and crayfish burrows. Based on the
habitat requirements and an onsite review, there is no suitable habitat for this species within
the project area, nor is suitable habitat likely to occur once the project is completed.
Eastern Henslow's sparro w
this species occupies ephemeral grassland habitats. Specific grassland features include:
unbroken patches of at least 75 acres which are part of larger tracts (at least 400 acres); native
grass species like little bluestem, prairie dropseed, blue joint, and Indian grass; few woody
plants; substantial litter and old, erect grass stems; and fairly deep weed and grass growth.
Periodic burning, light grazing, and controlled mowing produce these conditions. Reclaimed strip
mines, fallow fields, powerline cuts, and restored prairie can also be used by this sparrow.
Winter habitats include coastal grasslands, pine savannah, and pitcher plant bogs. The project
area is currently tilled cropland with several degraded headwater streams (drainage ditches).
Based on the habitat requirements and an onsite review, there is no suitable habitat for this
species within the project area, therefore a biological conclusion of "No Effect" has been made.
•

•
Kemp's (Atlantic) Ridlev sea turtle
Due to the projects distance from the Atlantic Ocean and Pamlico Sound, and lack of any
suitable habitat; a biological conclusion of "No Effect" has been made.
Rafinesgue's big -eared bat
This bat has a split range in North Carolina, in the southern Appalachians, and in the sandhills
and coastal plain. Natural roost sites include hollow trees and caves, but throughout its range
most records of this species are from abandoned buildings. Caves and mines are used by this bat
in the upland portions of its range, including North Carolina. In abandoned structures, this bat is
found in the darkest portions of the building, preferring windowless rooms such as bathrooms
and closets; but in caves, areas receiving some natural light seem preferred. Sites along river
systems and other permanent bodies of water nearby old growth forests are preferred. Based
on the habitat requirements and an onsite review, there is no suitable habitat within the project
area, nor is suitable habitat likely to occur once the project is completed. Therefore, a biological
conclusion of "No Effect" has been made.
Red wolf
The last red wolves were found in coastal prairie and marsh habitat because this was the last
area in which the animals were allowed to remain. Any habitat area in the southeastern United
States of sufficient size, which provides adequate food, water, and the basic cover requirement
of heavy vegetation, should be suitable habitat for the red wolf. Telemetry studies indicate that
red wolf home range requirements vary from about 25 to 50 square miles. Given the current
• land use practices, the project lacks good foraging habitat, although wolves may travel through
the site as they follow the drainage corridor. Due to their experimental population status, their
presence cannot legally establish critical habitat. Therefore, a biological conclusion of "No
Effect" has been made.
Red - Cockaded woodpecker
Red - Cockaded Woodpeckers (RCWs) require open stands of pine, containing trees at least 60
years old and living, in which to excavate their cavities. Longleaf pines (Pinus palustris) are most
commonly used as cavity trees, but other species of southern pine such as loblolly pine (Pinus
taeda), are also acceptable. Foraging habitat is provided in mature (greater than 30 years old)
pine and mixed pine /hardwood stands ranging' from 80 to 125 acres. Dense stands of
hardwoods, or pine stands with a dense hardwood understory are avoided. The proposed
project area is currently tilled cropland with several degraded headwater streams (ditches).
Once restored, the project will function as a headwater system dominated by stands of
bottomland hardwoods and pockets of emergent wetland vegetation. Based on the habitat
requirements and an onsite review, there is no suitable habitat for RCWs within the project
area, nor is suitable habitat likely to occur once the project is completed. Therefore, a biological
conclusion of "No Effect" has been made.
West Indian manatee
The West Indian Manatee is an endangered species which inhabits both marine and freshwater
environments. Based on the habitat requirements and an onsite review, there is no suitable
habitat for Manatees within the project area, nor is suitable habitat likely to occur once the
project is completed. Therefore, a biological conclusion of "No Effect" has been made.
•

G'rassleaf arrowhead
This aquatic herbaceous plant is rooted to the ground with stems and leaves emerging above
the water surface. This species is commonly found in waterways, marshes, swamps, drainage
ditches, irrigation channels and rice crops in warmer temperate, sub - tropical and tropical
environments. Currently, the distribution of this species is not found in this area. Based on the
habitat requirements and an onsite review, there is no suitable habitat for this species within
the project area, nor is suitable habitat likely to occur once the project is completed. Therefore,
a biological conclusion of "No Effect" has been made.
Rough- leaved loosestrife
This species generally occurs in the ecotones or edges between longleaf pine uplands and pond
pine pocosins (areas of dense shrub and vine growth usually on a wet, peaty, poorly drained
soil) on moist to seasonally saturated sands and on shallow organic soils overlaying sand.
Rough -leaf loosestrife has also been found on deep peat in the low shrub community of large
Carolina bays (shallow, elliptical, poorly drained depressions of unknown origin). The grass-
shrub ecotone, where rough -leaf loosestrife is found, is fire- maintained, as are the adjacent
plant communities (longleaf pine - scrub oak, savanna, flatwoods, and pocosin). The proposed
project area is currently tilled cropland with several degraded headwater streams (ditches).
Once restored, the project will function as a headwater system dominated 'by stands of
bottomland hardwoods and pockets of emergent wetland vegetation. Based on the habitat
requirements and an onsite review, there is no suitable habitat for the Rough - leaved loosestrife
• within the project area, nor is suitable habitat likely to occur once the project is completed.
Therefore, a biological conclusion of "No Effect" has been made.
Sensitive Joint Vetch
Sensitive -Joint Vetch grows in the intertidal zone where plants are flooded twice daily. These
intertidal areas require lunar tides, riot wind driven tides that are typically found in the project
area. The species seems to prefer the marsh edge at an elevation near the upper limit of tidal
fluctuation. It is usually found in areas where plant diversity is high (50 species per acre) and
annual species predominate. Bare to sparsely vegetated substrates appear to be a habitat
feature of critical importance to this plant. In Nort h Carolina, it is frequently found in the
estuarine meander zone of tidal rivers where sediments transported from upriver settle out and
extensive marshes are formed. The project site is currently tilled cropland with several
degraded headwater streams (ditches). Once restored, the project will function as a headwater
stream system (swamp run) dominated by stands of bottomland hardwoods and pockets of
emergent wetland vegetation. Based on the habitat requirements and-an onsite review, there is
no suitable habitat for Sensitive -Joint Vetch within the project area, nor is suitable habitat likely
to occur once the project is completed.
Venus' flvtraR
The Venus' flytrap is found in nitrogen- and phosphorus -poor environments, such as bogs and
wet savannahs. Small in stature and slow growing, the Venus flytrap tolerates fire well, and
depends on periodic burning to suppress its competition. Fire suppression threatens its future
in the wild. it survives in wet sandy and peaty soils. Although it has been successfully
transplanted and grown in many locales around the world, it is found natively only in North and
• South Carolina in the United States, specifically within a 60 -mile radius of Wilmington, North
Carolina. The project site is currently tilled cropland with several degraded headwater streams

0
(ditches). Once restored, the project will function as a headwater stream system (swamp run)
dominated by stands of bottomland hardwoods and pockets of emergent wetland vegetation.
Based on the habitat requirements and an onsite review, there is no suitable habitat for this
species within the project area, nor is suitable habitat likely to occur once the project is
completed.
•
•

U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
• WILMINGTON DISTRICT
Action Id. SAW-2013 -02102 County: Beaufort U.S.G.S. Quad: Hackney
NOTIFICATION OF JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION
Property Owner: Albemarle Restorations, LLC Agent:
Attn: Ed Temple
Address: Post Office Box 206 Address:
Fairfield North Carolina 27826
Property description: Property consists of mostly farm fields with an area of swamp forest along Horse Branch.
Size (acres) approx. 108 acres ' Nearest Town Choeowtntty
Nearest Waterway Chocowinity Creek River Basin Tar- Pamlico
USGS HUC 03020104 Coordinates 35.447819 N - 77.103757 W
Location description: Property known as the Hudson Farm is located south of Chocowinity east of US Highway 17;
and on the north side of Possum Track Road The request was to make a iurisdictionaI determtntation on four ditches
{labelled on the map as Swamp Runs #1,.#2, #3 and #4) These four ditches will be referred to as the protect area.
Indicate Which of the Following Apply:
A. Preliminary Determination
_ Based on preliminary information, there may be wetlands on the above described property. We strongly suggest you have
this property inspected to determine the extent of Department of the Army (DA) jurisdiction. To be considered final, a
jurisdictional determination must be verified by the Corps. This preliminary determination is not an appealable action
under the Regulatory program Administrative Appeal Process ( Reference 33 CFR Part 331). If you wisb, you may
request an approved JD (which may be appealed), by contacting the Corps district for further instruction. Also, you may
provide new information for further consideration by the Corps to reevaluate the JD.
B. Approved Determination
_ There are Navigable Waters of the United States within the above described property subject to the permit requirements of
Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act and Section 404 of the Clean Water Act. Unless there is a change in the law or
our published regulations, this determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this
notification.
X_ There are waters of the U.S. including wetlands on the above described project area subject to the permit requirements of
Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (CWA)(33 USG § 1344). Unless there is a change in the law or our published
regulations, this determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this notification.
_ We strongly suggest you have the wetlands on your property delineated. Due to the size of your property and/or our
present workload, the Corps may not be able to accomplish this wetland delineation in a timely manner. For a more timely
delineation, you may wish to obtain a consultant. To be considered final, any delineation must be verified by the Corps.
X The waters of the U.S. including wetlands on your project area have been delineated and the delineation has been
verified by the Corps. We strongly suggest you have this delineation surveyed. Upon completion, this survey should be
reviewed and verified by the Corps. Once verified, this survey will provide an accurate depiction of all areas subject to
CWA jurisdiction on your property which, provided there is no change in the law or our published regulations, may be
relied upon for a period not to exceed five years.
_ The waters of the U.S. including wetlands have been delineated and surveyed and are accurately depicted on the plat
signed by the Corps Regulatory Official identified below on Unless there is a change in the law or our published
regulations, this determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this notification.
_ There are no waters of the U.S., to include wetlands, present on the above described project area which are subject to the
permit requirements of Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (33 USC 1344). Unless there is a change in the law or our
published regulations, this determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this
notification.
Pape I of 2

• X The property is located in one of the 20 Coastal Counties subject to regulation under the Coastal Area Management Act
(CAMA). You should contact the Division of Coastal Management in Washington, NC, at (252) 946 -6481 to determine
their requirements.
Placement of dredged or fill material within waters of the US and /or wetlands without a Department of the Army permit may
constitute a violation of Section 301 of the Clean Water Act (33 IJSC § 1311). If you have any questions regarding this
determination aricl /or the Corps regulatory program, please contact William Wescott at910- 251 -4629.
C. Basis For Determination Swamp Runs #1, #2, and #4 showed evidence of flow and an ordinary high water
marls (OHWM). Combined, these three flitches are approximately 2,000 linear feet in length. There are Section
404 wetlands adjacent to Swamp Run #4 at the point where it joins Horse Branch. Swamp Run #3 does not exhibit
an OHWM but is located in a natural valley and connects a forested wetland to Swamp Run #2.
D. Remarks
E. Attention USDA Program Participants
This del ineation/determination has been conducted to identify the limits of Corps' Clean Water Act jurisdiction for the
particular site identified in this request. The delineation /determination may not be valid for the wetland conservation
provisions of the Food Security Act of 1985. If you or your tenant are USDA Program participants, or anticipate participation
in USDA programs, you should request a certified wetland determination fi-om the local office of the Natural Resources
Conservation Service, prior to starting work.
F. Appeals Information (This information applies only to approved jurisdictional determinations as indicated in
• B. above) ,
This correspondence constitutes an approved jurisdictional determination for the above described site. if you object to this
determination, you may request an administrative appeal under Corps regulations at 33 CFR Part 331. Enclosed you will find a
Notification of Appeal Process (NAP) fact sheet and request for appeal (RFA) form. If you request to appeal this
determination you must submit a completed RFA form to the following address:
US Army Corps of Engineers
South Atlantic Division
Attn: Jason Steele, Review Officer
60 Forsyth Street SW, Room l OM 15
Atlanta, Georgia 30303 -8801
In order for an RFA to be accepted by the Corps, the Corps must determine that it is complete, that it meets the criteria for
appeal under 33 CFR part 331.5, and that it has been received by the Division Office within 60 clays of the (late of the NAP.
Should you decide to submit an RFA form, it must be received at the above address by 12/27/2013.'
* *It is not necessary to submit n RFA form to the Di vision Office if you do not object to the determination in this
correspondence.
Corps Regulatory Official: z
Date: 10/28/2013 Expiration Date: 10/28/2018
The Wilmington District is committed to providing the highest level of support to the public. To help us ensure we continue to
do so, please complete the attached customer Satisfaction Survey or visit htm:/ laer2 .nwp.usace.army.mil /sur-vev 1i"I to
complete the survey online.
• Copy furnished:

•
•
•
, 'M!' -0 t 01'0 A 1 01
M to!", i P
, HARI SR. � ! 4-1 It XM ti.
M , N
� AN, 'A ft ONSO
1w-g-ou 4 1 r�'- , , "P,
g "a ISNIIKI-111P-W� , �'Vk' mmv.n��
Applicant: Albemarle Restorations, LLC File Number: SAW 2013-02102 Date: 10/28/21013
Attached is:
See Section below
❑
INITIAL PROFFERED PERMIT (Standard Permit or Letter of permission)
A
❑
PROFFERED PERMIT (Standard Pennit or'Letter of pen-nission)
B
❑
PERMIT DENTAL
C
APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION
D
❑
PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION
E
SECTION ' 1, - -Th 6 following identifies y6ui" r'i glit's'an d'o ption' s" rega rd i ng an administrative appeal of fl,�6 above- decision
" -, - , - .' " - -
0
Additioha'morm onmay,,e-c at iitt6'.I/wNA��.us"ace.a'rrnv.'m�l/in�Vfuncti ils/c�`v/cec r
-A
�g il'iiii'�ns7at.33 CFR Part 33
A: INITIAL PROFFERED PERMIT: You may accept or object to the permit
• ACCEPT: If you received a Standard Permit, you may sign the permit document and return it to the district engineer for final
authorization. If you received a Letter of Permission (LOP), you may accept the LOP and your work is authorized. Your
signature on the Standard Permit or acceptance of the LOP means that you accept the permit in its entirety, and waive all
rights to appeal the permit, including its terms and conditions, and approved jurisdictional determinations associated with the
permit.
OBJECT: If You object to the permit (Standard or LOP) because of certain terms and conditions therein, you may request
that the permit be modified accordingly. You must complete Section 11 of this form and return the form to the district
engineer. Your objections must be received by the district engineer within 60 days of the date of this notice, or you will
forfeit your right to appeal the permit in the future. Upon receipt of your letter, the district engineer will evaluate your
objections and may: (a) modify the permit to address all of your concerns, (b) modify the permit to address some of your
objections, or (c) not modify the pen-nit having determined that the permit should be issued as previously written. After
evaluating your objections, the district engineer will send You a proffered permit for your reconsideration, as indicated in
Section B below.
B: PROFFERED PERMIT: You may accept or appeal the permit
* ACCEPT: If you received a Standard Pennit, you may sign the permit document and return it to the district engineer for final
authorization. If you received a Letter of Permission (LOP), you may accept the LOP and your work is authorized. Your
signature on the Standard Permit or acceptance of the LOP means that you accept the pen-nit in its entirety, and waive all
rights to appeal the permit, including its terms and conditions, and approved jurisdictional determinations associated with the
permit.
* APPEAL: If you choose to decline the proffered permit (Standard or LOP) because of certain terms and conditions therein,
you may appeal the declined permit under the Corps of Engineers Administrative Appeal Process by completing Section 11 of
this form and sending the form to the division engineer. This form must be received by the division engineer within 60 days
of the date of this notice.
C-. PERMIT DENIAL: You may appeal the denial of a. permit under the Corps of Engineers Administrative Appeal Process by
completing Section 11 of this form and sending the form to the division engineer. This form must be received by the division
engineer within 60 days of the date of this notice.
D: APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION: You may accept or appeal the approved JD or provide new
information.
• ACCEPT: You do not need to notify the Corps to accept an approved JD. Failure to notify the Corps within 60 days of the
date of this notice, means that you accept the approved JD in its entirety, and waive all rights to appeal the approved JD.
• APPEAL: If you disagree with the approved JD, you may appeal the approved JD under the Corps of Engineers
Administrative Appeal Process by completing Section 11 of this form and sending the form to the district engineer. This form
must be received by the division engineer within 60 days of the date of this notice.
z'

E: PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION: You do not need to respond to the Corps regarding the
•
preliminary .ID. The Preliminary JD is not appealable. if you wish, you may request an approved JD (which may be appealed),
by contacting the Corps district for further instruction. Also you may provide new information for further consideration by the
Corps to reevaluate the JD.
._...... �.. ,__..:::-„; r- , -., �-•,:.».,+-:-•; oa, �..,>, ..,.<_ i- u, a.. i�vil_< 1riV. :�li,Crl;;lVVllrlE"":.H',i =r' �.:.�5 "k _{:.rc.�,.,..ri,' *�4i'���✓'",
REASONS FOR APPEAL OR OBJECTIONS:
(Describe your reasons for appealing the decision or your objections to an initial
proffered permit in clear concise statements. You may attach additional information to this form to clarify where your reasons or
objections are addressed in the administrative record.)
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION: The appeal' is limited to a review of the administrative record, the Corps memorandum for the
record of the appeal conference or meeting, and any supplemental information that the review'officer has determined is needed to
clarify the administrative record. Neither- the appellant nor the Corps may add new information or analyses to the record.
However, you may provide additional information to clarify the location of information that is already in the administrative
record.
If you have questions regarding this decision and/or the .� .. „• � +��f
If you only have questions regarding the appeal process you may
appeal process you may contact: also contact:
District Engineer, Wilmington Regulatory Division, Mr. Jason Steele, Administrative Appeal' Review Officer
Attn: William Wescott CESAD -PDO
2407 West Fifth Street U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, South Atlantic Division
• Washington, North Carolina 27889 60 Forsyth Street, Room I01v115
910- 251 =4629 Atlanta, Georgia 30303 -8801
Dl— 562 -5137
RIGHT OF ENTRY: Your signature below grants the right of entry to Corps of Engineers personnel, and any government
consultants, to conduct investigations of the project site during the course of the appeal process. You will be provided a 15 day
notice of any site investigation, and will have the opportunity to artici ate in all site investigations.
Date: Telephone number:
of appellant or
For appeals on Initial Proffered Permits send this form to:
District Engineer, Wilmington Regulatory Division, Attn: , 69 Darlington Avenue, Wilmington, North
Carolina 28403
For Permit denials, Proffered Permits and approved Jurisdictional Determinations send this form to:
Division Engineer, Commander, U.S. Army Engineer Division, South Atlantic, Attn: Mr. Jason Steele,
Administrative Appeal Officer, CESAD -PDO, 60 Forsyth Street, Room 10M15, Atlanta, Georgia 30303 -8801
Phone: [phone]
•

• NC DWO Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
•
•
Date:
Project/Site:
Latitude:
Evaluator:
County:
Longitude:
Total Points:
Stream is at least intermittent ac)
Stream Det min tion, (circle one)
Other
if? 19 or erennial if ? 30* .
p
Ephemeral ntermitten Perennial
e.g. Quad Name:
PAN,
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal = '*6 _)
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
1 a, Continuity of channel bed and'bank
0
1
2
0
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalwed
(9 -
1
2'
3
3. In-channel structure: ex, dffle-pool, step-pool,
riople- ool sequence
0
6)
2
3
4. Particle, size of stream, substrate
0
6)
2
3
5. Active/relict fi6odplain
0
(V
2
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1
2
3
7. Recent alluvia] deposits
0
1
2
3
-8. Headcuts
(22
1
2-
3,
9. Grade control
0
0.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
1.6
10. Natural valley
0
0.5
1
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
LNo :f
Yes = 3
. artificial ditches are not rated', see discussions in manual
B. H.vdroloav (Subtotal = IS - 6 )
12; Presence of Baseflow
0
1
2
3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
(V
)�A
2
3
14. Leaf lifter
1.5
(9
0,5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
5
1
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
2
1
1.5
17. Soil-ba[sed evidence of high water table?
No=O
Yes es
C. Bioloqv (Subtotal = I ) -
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants,in streambed
3
i
0
20. Macrobenth6s (note diversity and abundance)
0
C V
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
w
1
2
3
22. Fish
(0
0.5
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
0
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
0
1
1.5
25. Algae
0
1
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
(F
= 0. OBL = 1.5 Other = 0
'perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes:
Sketch:

• NC DW(p Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
L -A
Date: V
qAqA
Project/Site: &�,
Latitude: 66- t1
Evaluator.
County;
Longitude: 11J; -
Total Points:
Stream De [circle one)
Other
Stream is at least intermittent
if? 19 orperehnial if a 30*
Ephemera er6nnial
e.g. Quad Name:
fl-I
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
1 a, Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
(-3)-
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
2
3
3. In-channel structure: ex. riffle-pool, step-0001,
ripp le- po6l sequence
0
0
2
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
in
2
3
5. Active/relict flbodplain
0
1
2
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0.
1
2
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
2
3
8. Hea&uts
0,
1
2
3
9. Grade control
0
0.5
1
1.51
1.5
10. Natural valley
01
0.5
U
11. Second or,greater order channel
No =
Yes = 3
artinclaicincnes are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hvdrofogy (Subtotal = iri .6 1
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
1
2
3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
1
2
3
14. Leaf litter
1.5
1
•0.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
0.5
1
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0.
Q-5
1
1.5
17. Soil-based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
U Biology (Subtotal = l.,J-z2 )
18. Fibrous roots in strearribed
3
7
1
0
19. Rooted, upland plants; in strearnbedI
3
2
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and,abundance)
-0
1
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
0000
1
2
3
22. Fish
0-5
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
0
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
0
1
1.5
25. Algae
01
.5
:i
4AO ;
26. Wetland plants in streambed
CW = 0.
OBL 1.5 Other 0
.perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes:
Sketch:

• NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
•
Date:
Absent
Project/Site:
Latitude: IT o) _ t
Evaluator: mc0k
County: &atf�-
Longitude: J) N -SS
Total Points:
Stream is at feast intermittent , '�
Stream Det m' ' n (circle on
Other
if 2:19 or erennial if z 30'
Ephemeral ntermitten , Perennial
e.g. Quad Name:
M
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal __)
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
18, Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2.
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
2
3
3. In- channel, structure: ex, riffle -pool, step -pool,
ri le- bol sequence
0
1
2
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
N
2
3
5. Active /relict floodplain
0
es =
2
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1
2
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0'
1
2
3
8. Headcuts
U
1'
2
3
9. Grade control
0
0.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
0.5
1
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
o ="O_
Yes = 3
arunciai ditches are not rated: see oiscus�s,,tons In manual �---^"
B. Hydrology (Subtotal= 5 .`:� )
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
1 •
2
3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
1
2
3
14. Leaf litter
1.5
1
0.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
0.5
1
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
2
1
1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
„ -_. ..q
No = 0
es =
U. estology ('Subtotal = t • a4np )
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
2
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
1
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
0
1
2
3
22. Fish
0
0.5
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
0
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
0
5
1
1.5
25. Algae
0
1
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
ACW = 0.7 OBL = 1.5
Other = 0
'perennial'streams may also be'identified using other methods. Seep. 35 of manual.
Notes:
Sketch:

• NC DWO Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
•
t�
Date: <0" �\
Project/Site:
0 Am kl
Latitude: Ulf _
Evaluator: J .&A
County: qsv�
Longitude:
Total Points: /
Stream is at least intermittent �`�
Stream Deter . n (circle one)
Ephemeral
Other
if? 19 or perennial if? 30'�
p ntermitten erennial
e. Quad Name:
9•
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal =__1__J
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
1a, Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
2
3
3. In- channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple-pool sequence
0
1
2
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
2
3
5. Active /relict floodplain
0
i
2
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1
2
3
7. Recent.alluvial deposits
0
1
2
3
8. Headcuts
26. Wetland plants in streambed
1
21
3
9. Grade control
0
0.5
W
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
0.5
1
1.5
11. Second or.greater order channel
LNO =
Yes = 3
artificial ditches are not rated; see discuss sIons in manual
B. Hydrology (Subtotal = 5 )
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
1
2
3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
7M
1
2
3
14. Leaf litter
1.5
1
0.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
0.5
1
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
0.5
1
1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
Yes =
U. 1610100V (Subtotal = t • dD )
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
2
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
2
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
1
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
1
2
3
22. Fish
0.5
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
0
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
0
1 1
1.5
25. Algae
0
1 1
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
ACW = 0.7
BL = 1.5 Other = 0
`perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. Seep. 35 of manual.
Notes:
Sketch:

0 NC DWO Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
•
is
Date: $ it
Project/Site: QSM {LG kS
Latitude: - bkq _ l
Evaluator: ir`
County:
Longitude:
Total Points:
Stream is at least intermittent
Stream Det circle one)
Ephemeral Qnteimittent erennial
Other
e.g. Quad Name:
if > 19 or perennial if a 30'
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal =--Q-)
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
1a. Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
2
3
3. In- channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple-pool se uence
0
(D
2
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
2
3
5. Active /relict floodplain
0
1
2
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1
2
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
24. Amphibians
1
2
3
8. Headcuts
1.5
1
2
3
9. Grade control
0
.5
1
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
0.5
1
11. Second or greater order channel
No = 0
kes = 3
artificial ditches are not rated; see.discussions in manual
B. Hydrology (Subtotal = I
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
1
2
3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
1
2
3
14. Leaf litter
1.5
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
3
1
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
0.5
1
1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
es = 3
C. Biology (Subtotal
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
2
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
2
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
C9
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
0
1
2
3
22. Fish
0
C75
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
0
0.5
1.5
24. Amphibians
0
1
1.5
25. Algae
0
.5
1
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5
Other = 0
`perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes:
Sketch:

•
•
•
1S
pii
NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
Date: 1'1)
Project/Site: U(�1
a
Latitude: Cq
Evaluator: �y �
County: {��.r�
Longitude:
1
2
3
Total Points:
Stream is at least intermittent
Stream De ion circle one
tq i )
Other
if';:, 19 or erennia! if >_ 30' �
E itt-ft Perennial
e.g. Quad Name:
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal =__V2__)
Absent
a
Moderate
Strong
18, Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalwag
0
1
0
3
3. In- channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
0.5
ripple-pool __ uence
0
0
2
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
2
3
5. Activelrelict floodplain
0
1
2
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1
2
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
2
3
8. Headcuts
0
2
3
9. Grade.control
0 0.5
1 1.5
10. Natural valley
0 0.5
1 1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
No =.O
es = 3
a artificial rli+chac nra nn+ ro +crl• c a : _I
B. Hydrology (Subtotal =
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
3
3
0
2
2
1
3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
7EEI
0
0
0
0.5
0.5
0.5
14. Leaf litter
1.5
3
1.5
1.5
1.5
25. Algae
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
0.5
1
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
0 5
17. Soil - based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
1.5
(: Rinlrinv - 0 1
p. 35 of manual.
es = 3
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
3
3
0
2
2
1
1
1
2
0.
0
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
22. Fish
23. Crayfish
24. Amphibians
0
0
0
0.5
0.5
0.5
2
1
1
3
1.5
1.5
1.5
25. Algae
0
0.5
1
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5
they =
'perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See
p. 35 of manual.
Notes:
Sketch:

•
APPENDIX C
• MITIGATION WORK PLAN DATA & ANALYSES
•

•
•
a
U F
X <
o y
w �
O
¢ O
2
O
��
N�-
p—
—
k�
ry or0
r N
Yr0
S
d. P
O S
S S
S S
S 8
S S
S S
S
S S
S
r r
14 a0
M P
P
S l0
P P
M vPi
O vrvi
vMi
C
O O
S O
O O
S O
O S
O S
0 0
0�
0 ado
r o
�p
Ca
9 V
�
O
S S
O S
_
X
E
�'
w
P—
N
—
d P
P QQ..
P
O N
——
r O
p
N �O
d
d
N oa
f —
S S
wj
O O
0 0
D o
0
e
O p
r
d
n
Q
.�]�
O
O
O S
S
S dd
G-
6
--
O G
O O
O
O M
0
r
0
O
r
e P
O O
O O
O
S O
S O
S 0
0
N—
VJ
aq
.2 V
V
pO
y
E
w
o
IC�
m
?."
ro c
-� 4—
E
i' c°
8
�
r
u5
pa
4a
'r0 v
v v
u
a'. ya
N v
El
?
id
S
p�
8
.3
S-
=_p
= bb
pb
r``
v-
v
->
a
v v
D m
m 3 1=.=
O
m a
a 3
u7 i
i
m
8
i a
8 O
a n
8
a 'z
e� >
v>
v
n >¢
C
..
oe d
8 8
c a
2
m m
i3 i2
m m
m
`v R
m
m

c:
•
•
m
H
V H
X a0
D �
Z V,
i O
°a o
°s
O
f
od
S
M S
a S
;
C
�
P
Q r
to Q
�. oo
O
O
O
�
U
v
mm
S
S
N
O
O
0 0
r
O a
p r
p
O N
N O
P
u
m
rn
a v
.
a
°
3
y01
0
0
� O
p r
p
n
"TIT
l4
O
Q
rrrr
N O
O N
ll
F
Q
N r
S OO
N a
P
7,
O
O `p
O O
N
Q
U
^
O
—
a
— O
G—
O
—
N
M—
P °�
P
r
N
P
O
<•j O
fV K
!V
O C!
G •--
NO
O N—
O
O
�p
G O
O
O O
O O
O C
O C
S
8
o S
S S
S o
S S
a S
S. S
e
S
S
8 8
8=
C �NNN��..•iii
O
o
O O
o O
C C
O G
G
o-
lV
-
O O
O O
'46 m
.Q
W
S
O 81-1
C OG
P od
O C
G
G O
G O
N n
o
6
1 0
0
t� Q
rOn h
or0
N
N
v
N
v.
P 16
N
O
O N
E �°O
O N
O
N
U
n
�
-
n
n
�
n
m
U
p
p
�
3
O—
d h
P kH
v i
0
vii
C
S
O S
O S
O
S O
S O
O
P O
O vt
N
8
8
O
O
S S
O O
O
r
r O
m
C
O O
O C
C o
o
v
G C
G
Q
6
W
°o °o
°o °o
Li

Appendix C
Reaches 1 -5 Proposed Design Parameters
• REACH 1 REACH 2
•
is
Stream Assessment Worksheet
Input Parameter: Enter:
12
Width (BF)
10
Depth (BF)
0.45
Flood -Prone Width
28
Sinuousity
1.030
Energy Gradient
0.006
n (Manning's)
0.05
Calculated Parameter Enter:
21.8
Width /depth ratio
22.2
Cross - sectional area
4.5
Entrenchment ratio
2.8
Wetted perimeter
10.9
Hydraulic radius
0.4
Q (cfs)
5.8
Velocity (ft/sec)
1.3
REACH 3
Stream Assessment Worksheet
Input Parameter: Enter:
Width (BF)
12
Depth (BF)
0.55
Flood -Prone Width
28.73
Sinuousity
39
Energy Gradient
0.005
n (Manning's)
0.05
Calculated Parameter Enter:
0.05
Width /depth ratio
21.8
Cross - sectional area
6.6
Entrenchment ratio
2.4
Wetted perimeter
13.1
Hydraulic radius
0.5
Q (cfs)
8.8
Velocity (ft/sec)
1.3
REACH 5
Stream Assessment Worksheet
Input Parameter: Enter:
Width (BF)
25
Depth (BF)
1.00
Flood -Prone Width
39
Sinuousity
Energy Gradient
0.003
n (Manning's roughne
0.05
Calculated Parameter Enter:
Width /depth ratio
25.0
Cross - sectional area
25.0
Entrenchment ratio
1.6
Wetted perimeter
27.0
Hydraulic radius
0.9
Q (cfs)
38.8
Velocity (ft/sec)
1.6
Stream Assessment Worksheet
Input Parameter: Enter:
Width (BF)
18
Depth (BF)
0.72
Flood -Prone Width
39
Sinuousity
Energy Gradient
0.0035
n (Manning's)
0.05
Calculated Parameters: Enter:
Width /depth ratio
25.0
Cross - sectional area
13.0
Entrenchment ratio
2.2
Wetted perimeter
19.4
Hydraulic radius
0.7
Q (cfs)
17.4
Velocity (ft/sec)
1.3
REACH 4
Stream Assessment Worksheet
Input Parameter: Enter:
Width (BF)
23
Depth (BF)
0.80
Flood -Prone Width
Sinuousity
Energy Gradient
0.0035
n (Manning's)
0.05
Calculated Parameters: Enter:
Width /depth ratio
28.8
Cross - sectional area
18.4
Entrenchment ratio
0.0
Wetted perimeter
24.6
Hydraulic radius
0.7
Q (cfs)
26.7
Velocity (ft/sec)
1.5

•
•
•
REACH 1
Appendix C
Reaches 1, 3, 4 Transition Sections Proposed Design Parameters
REACH 3
Assessment Worksheet
Input Parameter: Enter:
Width (BF)
Depth (BF)
Flood -Prone Width
Sinuousity,
Energy Gradient
n (Manning's)
Calculated Parameter Enter:
Width (BF)
Width /depth ratio
20.0
Cross - sectional area
2.5
Entrenchment ratio
4.0
Wetted perimeter
7.7
Hydraulic radius
0.3
Q (cfs)
5.8
Velocity (ft/sec)
2.4
REACH 4
Stream Assessment Worksheet
Input Parameter: Enter:
Width (BF)
Width (BF)
18
Depth (BF)
0.55
Flood -Prone Width
Sinuousity,
Sinuousity
Energy Gradient
Energy Gradient
0.02
n (Manning's)
0.05
Calculated Parameter Enter:
Width /depth ratio
32.7
Cross - sectional area
9.9
Entrenchment ratio
0.0
Wetted perimeter
19.1
Hydraulic radius
0.5
Q (cfs)
26.9
Velocity (ft/sec)
2.7
Assessment Worksheet
Input Parameter: Enter:
Width (BF)
9
Depth (BF)
0.45
Flood -Prone Width
28.73
Sinuousity,
Hydraulic radius
Energy Gradient
0.016
n (Manning's)
0.05
Calculated Parameters: Enter:
Width /depth ratio
20.0
Cross - sectional area
4.1
Entrenchment ratio
3.2
Wetted perimeter
9.9
Hydraulic radius
0.4
Q (cfs)
8.4
Velocity (ft/sec)
2.1

APPENDIX D
• PROJECT PLAN SHEETS ( "11x17 ")
•

t1 00, a m p � O D o O� N O 2
a s rD ID c o w o c o z
L - ,, o o n c n n Gl
o =
o= < - `A re on o- o O oz
a n o rD � r i. o u
ni rSr S O O l0
.3o s rDOO rD
rD N a rOr 3 rD
ID O In a Q c::E 3
X' (D I" N rD On, N 0 O S °<
a - rD
� n Z 3 0 rD n n
cn rD O
�. S O N t0 rlD O r�r d
S°1 0 o?0 0 0�0� o
M OL a (7D -
N Q) N Q CL �= 2, (SD m O_
rD o
d a 0 0, a 0'' Z d t o
a u a c
ET ?orD° 9(D -0
s °rt (DD w ° ° ° a rrDD
�(D o �Ww D? o;��.
rt rD n � Q O, rn rt, t0
re 0- G 3 o rD
rDa cnm� 30 =Sa.
<n3 cSn(D 2, a CD
oa
3c
0
�y
H
D m
O
r A
C) C
n m
o
m
00
o T (n
m O m
vD
n
O m ~,<
Ln - C <
- D
O
m m
L
oz C
D coo
D D
n z
n
m n m
Ln n
0 a a a a a 1
n 3 = = = ;
V1 A W N F+ z m 1 .
D 1 I I
3
D 1 I I !
1
0) -4 D 1 I
J4 V (1•r N W -n
m r v cn
n 70 p c v
Oz o zo 3 ° � o
v --1 -0 o m v
T9 70 O A o 0 LrI m mM
�. -I m mm ter, mm -n p p
�, -~ D rn p D On W
0
(� Cni 7 m C
Do m
r 3 z
41 w vi w
i r., w m
3 D 3
n p�+ �w7q n QC �0 p W *C 0 Qd° N W �+a 3 O D � r•DrtO -mn Ci
r�-r ~ o. d O M rar (On O p°j rD rD a d O, O N In O rD N p(Dj W n a -^ 07 � O. O � O rD 0 a m
c y m cp D o fl D o 03, � (DD 3 a D n v w o a o �° i° a 73 D M W m„ o m 0 3 z3 a o o ° n o -i z Ui
00 ire < 3m
c n) Z° 9 n<� c °r (D m <. rni o7 r°-D -I n e? o °Y a a x, nn o a D m 0- CD w rD
c ru 3 0' w o' o n u° rt ^ O m o CCD n rn rD ° 3 art rD c s co 3 n ^° o 3 r
o' °< 3 0 00 s> > i. o o.0 v' v re o o? 3 v 0 6 o n° c n rD o 3 w p Z
c � 3 a Z, = 3 �-' rt -° E o -0a c° n a =� a ID rD 3 o= rD o' c a rD -0 m o rn a O
o rt c a, o o= c 0 o 0-m �v A m -I rt n° n o rD S a s 3 rn
rD°w.v �oN �n ��na�o °u°.artrto�o Drt� ��co�oM0Zi -0Ln oQn��3N
3. N o rt it e s °° a rD g ° °^ me v no 3 v p D„ n� 3 m c °_ a s �< re n m rt
° @ u) -0 re3x wiDm avfDo cS3° o orox reo0O o=n rD o
0 6 c r c ° ?. v o o, n ro °F o° 0 U) 3 rD c a n o p °° a O 3
ID Q -< a 6 � d C ID o rD O_ a rt rD � D o' (� !D �. rD = O O o
6. �. rD n O O 7 ra-r o rD 9 _, O _ rD O Q ,vOi C '°6 rnD S d= A D a LA �. o 7 7
W o re n o o W ° a * ^ re < a c m Q v m°
re ° n a o co o iD a c m rt rD m �. 0 r o° c o m re 6 c a Ui
6 r lrtD a d O (? �' a 3 �. 07 O Q- ) ;-0 IIDD fv N v � O =� a ON D1 O S
a n o c a n 0 T. 3 c a OL o. o° (D N 0- D° a o 0 3° v°
a o rt o- rDOO c °,Q 07 i a�� (A°' irtrD no ca,rtS c° r3D6
a) '�� a� rtrtO �D_� Oo O O fD O rD 0 6Q V O3O �1O'UI.NO nQ� � ° O dn^ 71 rD
rD M rD �Oo �3 "`f) 0°'° °30= vo�o° JX C:CL 0) 0U1(D 0OrD o- ��ao °mom°
oCi O a 0 0 O : p- n a- rD a Ort rN-r d CD 6 N �? a p a n 0 a d _ �_ O Q
o_ -� rD c 0 c a 3 -om D Da0 o�3 iD
a O N a fl_ O O O 70c- '00 ° 0- D_ N _0 C)- •< a O t0 ° n On ° C Z a NJ -0 °
rD < °^ < o 0 a x v. n 3 a s vc _ ° a rD co 0 a o. o r�o Q o u -1 °rt a
rD lD "O - rt O O 7 a rD n O C c rD - �' S C
3mo °o o arD n�� v �r��n n n3C7amaom ocr -i :E rD < ren
3 d �9- rt O v O rD C 7 N O V rt N (D n O
ID 'no n? G° o <`° v^ rto creo�a� or°e oEro r°D W z
rt a < /� C D O a s C 'O0 rD 7 o n ° cn = n rar a Q-0 o rt W 3 CL a 9 n v0 T AD S
Z3 v ! u v, 6T c (D 3 0 Ln a 3 c o 0 o' rD c 3 C) v_. ID 0 m v, rD
a CL S rD 0- S N o D O rD n� O a a O n O N r Q 7 0 -0 O
r r8 v a fl, 3 (D �_ O1 a Z5 rD O (n 7 n �'* Ln p '< r�-r C Z
a a -3 a- a < a o =e <.ca ��i ��'-r- o 0
o O O 07 O 6 o n fl_ °rr' n a O- 7 a O S 7= 7 rD a s 7' 3 cn a rar C) O rn-n p r� s a rnD
a Q rD '< rD (D rD s v re e_ re o o Q a n rD rD e 3 e c v v rn n u 0
m
rn
Z
r
C)
m
z
0
r�
Ecosystem
n / m
n
w
L.
m
D
n
S
N
/'---
r
_\ d
O
U-)
rn W
n z
ul m
" m
H
D 0
0 O
M v
O
O rn
D m
\ 2 X n /
mn
D m
\ \ 3 �
_C7 70 /.
0 0 i.
F-`Nj N w VO�L1 W Nr VO�ci'I J,WNrr
: oi000 Ili Mcn-t�WNrO:
p�vvOO�O�DO������0��000�G1G�G1G '�G7G7G7�
zzDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDppppppp
Z��HHHHHF— II— IHHHHHHHHHHHHH fyHI- -IHHHH V)
p, �rru,)U) rrrrrrrrrrrrzzzZZZZ
DZZ(nUI(n(n(n(n ( n(n ( nU1(n ( n ( n(ncncncncncncn m
�G�G1RDSpR° R° SZ° SpS�° Q° R °R°RDR°R°R°R°R°R°R°Q°¢°vvvvvvvm
p�( n( n( n (nU7N(n(n(nCn(n(nNUI(n(n(n(n(nN
3D mmmrnmmrnmmmrn 5-> �-- 5->�
zzzzzzz
D z H H H
60-0066-0-0635000000000 O<
Z zzZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ m
[,) (nVl(n(n(n (!l(n (n (n (n U1(n (n (n (n (n (n (n (n (n 70
r
Z
HUDSON PROPERTY
PLAN TITLE
BEAUFORT CO., NC
EEP PROJECT ID: 95361
EEP CONTRACT #:004638
z
0
m
X
O
2
m
q
n
a H
z
II
w 3
o D
°o_
0
Old 4,
ow
t#
ar Rp
3
m
mm
v
(i
v
�
o
rn
�o
o t.0
o crI
W F-
00
co
m
D
c
n
n
O
z
9
C
O
O
m
D
[A
m
D
m
m
O
m
3
m
O
O
O�
z�
O
r
r
n
v
o
m
a
O
9
LBEMARLE RESTORATIONS, LLC
WETLAND WILDLIFE HABITAT CREATION
P.O. P.O. BOX 176 FAIRFIELD, NC 27826
(252) 333 -0249 FAX [phone]
l?7
V • H
rmn
r
e
A
G
m
n p�+ �w7q n QC �0 p W *C 0 Qd° N W �+a 3 O D � r•DrtO -mn Ci
r�-r ~ o. d O M rar (On O p°j rD rD a d O, O N In O rD N p(Dj W n a -^ 07 � O. O � O rD 0 a m
c y m cp D o fl D o 03, � (DD 3 a D n v w o a o �° i° a 73 D M W m„ o m 0 3 z3 a o o ° n o -i z Ui
00 ire < 3m
c n) Z° 9 n<� c °r (D m <. rni o7 r°-D -I n e? o °Y a a x, nn o a D m 0- CD w rD
c ru 3 0' w o' o n u° rt ^ O m o CCD n rn rD ° 3 art rD c s co 3 n ^° o 3 r
o' °< 3 0 00 s> > i. o o.0 v' v re o o? 3 v 0 6 o n° c n rD o 3 w p Z
c � 3 a Z, = 3 �-' rt -° E o -0a c° n a =� a ID rD 3 o= rD o' c a rD -0 m o rn a O
o rt c a, o o= c 0 o 0-m �v A m -I rt n° n o rD S a s 3 rn
rD°w.v �oN �n ��na�o °u°.artrto�o Drt� ��co�oM0Zi -0Ln oQn��3N
3. N o rt it e s °° a rD g ° °^ me v no 3 v p D„ n� 3 m c °_ a s �< re n m rt
° @ u) -0 re3x wiDm avfDo cS3° o orox reo0O o=n rD o
0 6 c r c ° ?. v o o, n ro °F o° 0 U) 3 rD c a n o p °° a O 3
ID Q -< a 6 � d C ID o rD O_ a rt rD � D o' (� !D �. rD = O O o
6. �. rD n O O 7 ra-r o rD 9 _, O _ rD O Q ,vOi C '°6 rnD S d= A D a LA �. o 7 7
W o re n o o W ° a * ^ re < a c m Q v m°
re ° n a o co o iD a c m rt rD m �. 0 r o° c o m re 6 c a Ui
6 r lrtD a d O (? �' a 3 �. 07 O Q- ) ;-0 IIDD fv N v � O =� a ON D1 O S
a n o c a n 0 T. 3 c a OL o. o° (D N 0- D° a o 0 3° v°
a o rt o- rDOO c °,Q 07 i a�� (A°' irtrD no ca,rtS c° r3D6
a) '�� a� rtrtO �D_� Oo O O fD O rD 0 6Q V O3O �1O'UI.NO nQ� � ° O dn^ 71 rD
rD M rD �Oo �3 "`f) 0°'° °30= vo�o° JX C:CL 0) 0U1(D 0OrD o- ��ao °mom°
oCi O a 0 0 O : p- n a- rD a Ort rN-r d CD 6 N �? a p a n 0 a d _ �_ O Q
o_ -� rD c 0 c a 3 -om D Da0 o�3 iD
a O N a fl_ O O O 70c- '00 ° 0- D_ N _0 C)- •< a O t0 ° n On ° C Z a NJ -0 °
rD < °^ < o 0 a x v. n 3 a s vc _ ° a rD co 0 a o. o r�o Q o u -1 °rt a
rD lD "O - rt O O 7 a rD n O C c rD - �' S C
3mo °o o arD n�� v �r��n n n3C7amaom ocr -i :E rD < ren
3 d �9- rt O v O rD C 7 N O V rt N (D n O
ID 'no n? G° o <`° v^ rto creo�a� or°e oEro r°D W z
rt a < /� C D O a s C 'O0 rD 7 o n ° cn = n rar a Q-0 o rt W 3 CL a 9 n v0 T AD S
Z3 v ! u v, 6T c (D 3 0 Ln a 3 c o 0 o' rD c 3 C) v_. ID 0 m v, rD
a CL S rD 0- S N o D O rD n� O a a O n O N r Q 7 0 -0 O
r r8 v a fl, 3 (D �_ O1 a Z5 rD O (n 7 n �'* Ln p '< r�-r C Z
a a -3 a- a < a o =e <.ca ��i ��'-r- o 0
o O O 07 O 6 o n fl_ °rr' n a O- 7 a O S 7= 7 rD a s 7' 3 cn a rar C) O rn-n p r� s a rnD
a Q rD '< rD (D rD s v re e_ re o o Q a n rD rD e 3 e c v v rn n u 0
m
rn
Z
r
C)
m
z
0
r�
Ecosystem
n / m
n
w
L.
m
D
n
S
N
/'---
r
_\ d
O
U-)
rn W
n z
ul m
" m
H
D 0
0 O
M v
O
O rn
D m
\ 2 X n /
mn
D m
\ \ 3 �
_C7 70 /.
0 0 i.
F-`Nj N w VO�L1 W Nr VO�ci'I J,WNrr
: oi000 Ili Mcn-t�WNrO:
p�vvOO�O�DO������0��000�G1G�G1G '�G7G7G7�
zzDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDppppppp
Z��HHHHHF— II— IHHHHHHHHHHHHH fyHI- -IHHHH V)
p, �rru,)U) rrrrrrrrrrrrzzzZZZZ
DZZ(nUI(n(n(n(n ( n(n ( nU1(n ( n ( n(ncncncncncncn m
�G�G1RDSpR° R° SZ° SpS�° Q° R °R°RDR°R°R°R°R°R°R°Q°¢°vvvvvvvm
p�( n( n( n (nU7N(n(n(nCn(n(nNUI(n(n(n(n(nN
3D mmmrnmmrnmmmrn 5-> �-- 5->�
zzzzzzz
D z H H H
60-0066-0-0635000000000 O<
Z zzZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ m
[,) (nVl(n(n(n (!l(n (n (n (n U1(n (n (n (n (n (n (n (n (n 70
r
Z
HUDSON PROPERTY
PLAN TITLE
BEAUFORT CO., NC
EEP PROJECT ID: 95361
EEP CONTRACT #:004638
z
0
m
X
O
2
m
q
n
a H
z
II
w 3
o D
°o_
0
Old 4,
ow
t#
ar Rp
3
m
mm
v
(i
v
�
o
rn
�o
o t.0
o crI
W F-
00
co
m
D
c
n
n
O
z
9
C
O
O
m
D
[A
m
D
m
m
O
m
3
m
O
O
O�
z�
O
r
r
n
v
o
m
a
O
9
LBEMARLE RESTORATIONS, LLC
WETLAND WILDLIFE HABITAT CREATION
P.O. P.O. BOX 176 FAIRFIELD, NC 27826
(252) 333 -0249 FAX [phone]

c)Oz
N 70 O
O
�rnrn
O �
C �
�M
= rn
�O
0,7<
G) m
�m
p V)
zrn
p
D
01
m
C77
C)
0
D
_ DO -1 -1 D-�
(n
�
0 0 0
M
Q a
a d
0 0 0
T (l O D
z
1
?
0
07
w
0
70
-00 (D
(D o
3
rn W
a v
D
1
o
('
O
I
0
0
0
A
07
W
V
W
Q
p
91
W
O
c'
1
w
l0
W
7
n
n
D D
< vii (D
0
a
a a
CCU
Ln
3
0,
0
<
n
o
-0 c r G) a �, -0
C � 0 3 (D
(D S 7 n Q Q
W o aq o o a '- �, m to
rD a .0 v O � O. O
_ N
n °1 v °
Q 3 a m
(D
0-
-c =
m z Z Z
n O O O
/ter /, `\ \-w } I I to
Y
F maorTe it
r
rA
n
N
- J 131
L - D i��HS
t, - D 13IHS
d�
•
F"! I
1
I
0
�
d
I
1
0>
o
1
I
0
e
1
I
D
o
�z
r) v
r7
(n
m-0
r
z
No
m
G)
rn
�
O
> O
�
O
0
-0
-4 v
v
V)
m 0
m
m
rr11
II <
O
V)
m 0
�O
cn
00
O
m V)
O
G7
NJ
C) I T1
70 m
m
p
�
rn
C
z m
m
m
p
m
0
p
Z p
� p
p
z
n
rncn
n0
o
�n
N
o
co O
0
C
�
z
D
3 0
z
-i
c
z
c
n 1
m
m
O
zz
Lf)
D
vii rn
co
O
p
o
3
0
D
�
O
U)
n
..
�
m
..
O
HUDSON PROPERTY
GRADING PLAN OVERALL
BEAUFORT CO., NC
EEP PROJECT ID: 95361
EEP CONTRACT #:004638
LBEMARLE RESTORATIONS, LLC
WETLAND RESTORATION,
STREAM RESTORATION, &
WILDLIFE HABITAT CREATION
P.O. BOX 176 FAIRFIELD, NC 27826
(252) 333 -0249 FAX [phone]

3
n
r
Z
m
v
D
G)
m
L�
w
a
t
t
t
t
1
1
t
Y
I
i
t
r
r
r
r
!
ri
1
k
I
4
t
I
E
1
t
t
3
n
r
z
m
v
D
G7
m
Gl
N
1
i
t
1 ,
S 4
4 y
i t
i y
1 Y'{
r
! t
i 4
! 4
l `
l
r
r
r
l
t
S
SS 0,l
O
t
�s
�t
(
!
l rr
+r Rl' rr
/
rr
r
r
f
rrr
rf
t
rr
f `
ty}y�t
1 tl t 1
t,iyi y
tt \ N
v yt
t0tt
to
t i
R:'\
/ f
/
/
70
D
n
2
ool
r
r -`
oolvr�
r'
- ----- -- - -- - --
40�
_______ -� 1101
' 401
OF u- Y m
•,1
J ,
t
I y
t I
t
t
{ CK t /
it(y rr City' !
ptyt\
J
/
r
/ rrf
I
S
i
1
I
I
w
~``♦
n
D
I
+
� r
V
00
- ----- -- - -- - --
40�
_______ -� 1101
' 401
OF u- Y m
•,1
J ,
t
I y
t I
t
t
{ CK t /
it(y rr City' !
ptyt\
J
/
r
/ rrf
N
I
S
i
1
I
I
w
n
D
I
� r
x ..
m M 0
n -u
to
CA z
Z F
m 7
o
v
Oo
i
z
HUDSON PROPERTY
m II
m 0
m
rn
G o
-ml o
<
m
GRADING PLAN
z
D �
o
C
Z
3
to
0
0
�
BEAUFORT CO., NC
,D
CD
p
--v
D
N
r
S
i
1
I
I
x ..
1
i
�
i
I
HUDSON PROPERTY
rn
GRADING PLAN
D �
C
_
~r
3
N
0
�
BEAUFORT CO., NC
O
p
--v
D
O
rn
0
m
EEP PROJECT ID: 95361
3
m
U-)
r
m
z m
Oo
EEP CONTRACT #:004638
N
a
A
„
o
n
m
z
o
O
ll
N
r
S
i
1
I
I
1
i
�
i
I
D �
C
~
~r
3
Z
O
p
--v
D
O
rn
0
m
3
m
U-)
r
m
z m
Oo
rn
o
n
�o
n
„
o
n
m
z
o
O
O
�
c
c:
C
D
z
m
Q
j
Z
LBEMARLE RESTORATIONS, LLC
WETLAND WILDLIFE RESTORATION, &
ON
P.O. BOX 176 FAIRFIELD, NC 27826
(252) 333 -0249 FAX [phone]

17
t
r
r
r
"p,
N
r
i
1
0
I'D
Cl
w , 1
In
T.
n
�
m
D
n v
cn
v
rn v
�O
cn
v
Z
m�
r)
z0
O
O
3
70
0
z
z
\
m p
p
3 p
�
m
rn
r
m
�m
m
m
m
z m
O
m
m
rn
I I
\\
`
0
<
0
—� 0
m
0
1
G)
`
`\ >` m
z
m
n
o
w
Z
��
�\
\� 1 v
O
O
3 O
O
OC
z
vv �v
>> et D
zi
O
cn
O
z
`
>\ m
c�
O
o
\
\ W
m
1
{ i
y
!
1 f
f
r 1
,, 11
t
i
t
1
/
/ rev I
/
/
V /
� rrr t
4�
r
r / /40
rn
m -0
Ln
O
2
rn m
M 0
00
00 p
n
70
O
V)
z
C)
/
"" N ' pOk� %% •.
I
...
�l
m
D
C)
<�y�/
1 {
r t
r '
ref-,
�,;� 6Z—
ze-
Qp
\
1
{
i
w
{
r
{
{
{
{
oft
3
n
2
r_
z
m
v
D
Gl
m
N
t
1
r
{
4
t
� r !
{
i
I !
1 {
t y
\\r
I
t
1
t�
/ 1
C)
+
\ � t
v i
{
vvv vvv v`v ♦ l
\ \
4 \
\ \ t
�yj l+I
HUDSON PROPERTY
rn GRADING PLAN
N BEAUFORT CO., NC
EEP PROJECT ID: 95361
Netmm , EEP CONTRACT #:004638
w El
/
LBEMARLE RESTORATIONS, LLC
WETLAND RESTORATION,
STREAM RESTORATION, &
WILDLIFE HABITAT CREATION
P.O. BOX 176 FAIRFIELD, NC 27826
(252) 333 -0249 FAX [phone]

I „`- .
w
u)
n 00
W
Iw
SOD
sow
w
W
w
w
W
F
1
m
o
W
W /` W W
W
N
W W
W
W Nr W
O
I „`- .
w
u)
n 00
W
Iw
wo
`° ° T
w tj I 1
orn � i G
G
0 O 0 0 - rn v D 7 3 C ; z
I I � O� O9 v m y <
cn O 0C) (n0 m0 m O 30 (n m m rn
rn O m r rn m m z m O rn
0 0 z 0 < 0 l 0 rn
I D m m m z
z � 3 cn < D c >
N z
o r m '-
,.
LOD f/
'�` `OD
ftaftft SOD ..
� w 03 SOD
W W W w t
Ln
I I w N
r
H-
-- D o -o r- -n o -0
;a o
w w (� w
W fv N �o N im ^
EEL
a'•' 1 w
D
a\
W w LrI �
Q — _ as
j/ D o w
;a C) -N 4 1 Ll 1
a ! �'
j> 0 N° I
N T W F
W 00
W rvt
D D i�00 rl r
€ �(rt
t
h
Ln
rn n
Z
r' D
D
m m !
r>
'
co
WG7 / i r;a W v rf,Jrrr tr
in q 'w 00 rrrrrr
� b rtrjr
w MATCHLINE PAGE G- 4
r � V
r I
w 1N
r r MATCHLINE PAGE G - 6
r co
rr w !N r
W= 1/ 1 E r r X
w
,/ klrr f Ir
v
l a }
do ! .I r t �r W
r
v v w u?
rn ;a X
O
=�o
m G rn
A
�! 0 07
V
LrT
/4
110
7
V
W �
N W
N
)NO w
w
�r
w
w�
N W
W
Lrl
�.Y W
IL 'w"
tt
co b
70 W
c�i 70 .Z7
w ,
0)' rn rn
u� w - --
t r O
r /
1 /
r
Cn F
j O
t �
` b
r
t
W
co rn
H oo tr b
� rr
D W r
\ V
r
\ \I w Jr
M 14
w � r
ao bQ s
w
W
w
w
W
F
O0
m
o
°
<
fi
O
°
Qj
n G
0
3
°
O
a
o
o
C)-
Lin
m
M
70
BEAUFORTCO., NC
r
m
m- r
m
0
Qj Lo
rt
a
rn
a
(6D_
a o
<
0)
Z o
a
b
D
_0
ltc�, I 1
b
A
Z3
wo
`° ° T
w tj I 1
orn � i G
G
0 O 0 0 - rn v D 7 3 C ; z
I I � O� O9 v m y <
cn O 0C) (n0 m0 m O 30 (n m m rn
rn O m r rn m m z m O rn
0 0 z 0 < 0 l 0 rn
I D m m m z
z � 3 cn < D c >
N z
o r m '-
,.
LOD f/
'�` `OD
ftaftft SOD ..
� w 03 SOD
W W W w t
Ln
I I w N
r
H-
-- D o -o r- -n o -0
;a o
w w (� w
W fv N �o N im ^
EEL
a'•' 1 w
D
a\
W w LrI �
Q — _ as
j/ D o w
;a C) -N 4 1 Ll 1
a ! �'
j> 0 N° I
N T W F
W 00
W rvt
D D i�00 rl r
€ �(rt
t
h
Ln
rn n
Z
r' D
D
m m !
r>
'
co
WG7 / i r;a W v rf,Jrrr tr
in q 'w 00 rrrrrr
� b rtrjr
w MATCHLINE PAGE G- 4
r � V
r I
w 1N
r r MATCHLINE PAGE G - 6
r co
rr w !N r
W= 1/ 1 E r r X
w
,/ klrr f Ir
v
l a }
do ! .I r t �r W
r
v v w u?
rn ;a X
O
=�o
m G rn
A
�! 0 07
V
LrT
/4
110
7
V
W �
N W
N
)NO w
w
�r
w
w�
N W
W
Lrl
�.Y W
IL 'w"
tt
co b
70 W
c�i 70 .Z7
w ,
0)' rn rn
u� w - --
t r O
r /
1 /
r
Cn F
j O
t �
` b
r
t
W
co rn
H oo tr b
� rr
D W r
\ V
r
\ \I w Jr
M 14
w � r
ao bQ s
�I
b
MARLE RESTORATIONS, LLC
WETLAND RESTORATION,
STREAM RESTORATION, &
WILDLIFE HABITAT CREATION
P.O. BOX 176 FAIRFIELD, NC 27826
(252) 333 -0249 FAX [phone]
x
HUDSON PROPERTY
GRADING PLAN
BEAUFORTCO., NC
a
- 1�j �.�°t�t�c}. •fit
s ste
EEP PROJECT ID: 95361
o
ltc�, I 1
EEP CONTRACT #:004638
A
onocrxnnn
�I
b
MARLE RESTORATIONS, LLC
WETLAND RESTORATION,
STREAM RESTORATION, &
WILDLIFE HABITAT CREATION
P.O. BOX 176 FAIRFIELD, NC 27826
(252) 333 -0249 FAX [phone]

C 0 ;p ;p Ln
< 1"' N N W -d 1
m N V W r O
° N r
O -I N r 07 t)
;u 0 P p O � LAJ
D W rat 0 -0 LlJ I rn
rn z rn rr) O Cpl I
cn cn � Q 0 O = D n
D26' fll r > � � v r r ra n v cn v m y r to v
[D �, r m rn F--r 0� 0 0 m� v 70 D� C z
4 p r o f1I rt o DO G7� 30 z0 O O m0 3 O C)
D rn < z F z 0 a v v 9 v -0 < v
`, \ OOm �o rt rn T =G� o �c� �o �o o rno -< I m
r1 to 5. m < m II 0 O� rn rrn m m zm O rn0 C)
_ Z3 76 < m 0 0 z 0 < 0 1 0
a \ b 0 a n z m 0 0 3 0 O O co 0
--- 0
z (f) T D czn � m C 0 0
C 3 � W C D
\\ \ \12\���'y� V �1
t1 \ \\ 1
co
Y,
♦
! \ \\
of w
Lo Uj LrI ;a
I
W W W
/
uj r
w � �
% I
w
rn
10A
Gi
`\`
P�
.y
�.4
N
t
's
I�
MATCHLINE PAGE G - 5
MATCHLINE PAGE G - 7
a\
�QO11
r
r1
r
1
!
!
/j
i
!
t
r
I
t,Ia
1
r
r
QOl
o3
Lri
w w
1
r
1
rrr
1
i
r
r
r
1
1�
r
l ,
/r
/
!
Crl In UJ
b oo Lq Yn
;a t
m
D
n
w
J '
_f
w�,\ \
vWi �?O 7w w � \\ y0
cn .4 1 \
Q0-7 r w j i oo � \v p -zn
r w C
m z
rr. rr D �� O
2 \\ T
w ,
Vl w / N ;a
n
r J r
r
i v t
I i
r w r
r �
I ?
+ Q� r
1� l
t
\
\
\
\ \
t \
uj uj W W
rn
i
W \''r W N/
ww w w
i1 w
D w
w
n __-
___ "79F„ w
m z�co
W T
M
i
•-
x
HUDSON PROPERTY
m
m
GRADING PLAN
rn
,
1
-
BEAUFORT CO., NC
! 1
2
N
EEP PROJECT ID: 95361
i �.L7 k't�m
Lii!
EEP CONTRACT #:004638
A
r
uj uj W W
rn
i
W \''r W N/
ww w w
i1 w
D w
w
n __-
___ "79F„ w
m z�co
W T
M
i
-i "' / b
00/
1 b0
BEMARLE RESTORATIONS, LLC
WETLAND RESTORATION,
STREAM RESTORATION, &
WILDLIFE HABITAT CREATION
P.O. BOX 176 FAIRFIELD, NC 27826
(252) 333 -0249 FAX [phone]
�!
;a m u
W
,
1
n p^
! 1
2
N
_-
r
z
m
O
C)
m m
rn
� W I
'1 A ur
-i "' / b
00/
1 b0
BEMARLE RESTORATIONS, LLC
WETLAND RESTORATION,
STREAM RESTORATION, &
WILDLIFE HABITAT CREATION
P.O. BOX 176 FAIRFIELD, NC 27826
(252) 333 -0249 FAX [phone]

1
1
�t
t
}
i
r
v n
tt
vrni owi r 'i /r n
t CRI
p
f �
N i Do m
-P
ty 7' l a zF' , �w
MATCHLINE PAGE G- 5
t
MATCHLINE PAGE G - 7
W I'
OD 70 w r
w
1 } f 70 w
41 / :.
r � ,
1 , r m �� f
D
co bo
t !`
w a�^
• �.° '�•• "� r' � � 111 N.
r
I rrrlf�rl
4
�cn
! ruin t/
f¢ril f
I
w
rn
w 70
Go 0
g� Ln a -
Ln
Ln
I f
w 60
r
' a '
vt
w ,•
Lq /
J a
�— — ________ � 3
i
i /rte` D
G)
.� m
r
C>
�
I
w
!-
fV
w
N
w
w
(!�
70
V
W
x ..
0
`o
U)
HUDSON PROPERTY
m
m
o
I
°
�'
<
GRADING PLAN
m��Z
o
°
3
o
0
N
o
o
-n Lrl
r
a
U)
70
Ln
rD (
M
;0
-
r
M r�r
<
�-0
a1
m- r
z
?F
m
m
0
rt
a<
m
m
a o
Z3
(T
rt
7
Ir-
z 0
<
0
� 0
D
rn i
O
�0 0
z
C>
�
I
-
x ..
`o
U)
HUDSON PROPERTY
� DD
m
D rn H
I
�'
GRADING PLAN
m��Z
z ° =G)
II
N
�
BEAUFORT CO., NC
-n Lrl
r
n o
U)
m y r
��
O4
-V
EEP PROJECT ID: 95361
m
�Ov
�-0
m-
z
cn0
U)
mO
m
O
m0 N
m
m
m
z m O
0
Ir-
z 0
<
0
� 0
D
rn i
O
�0 0
z
3
°
T
D
OO
m
T
m
C
3
C
G
r
70
D
-
0 m
O
-
�
z
cn
C
m
m
O
O
z
0
C
70
I
1
v
O
m
I
00
O
C
z
D
3
Y
r
z
m
v
D
G)
m
3
C)
r
z
m
D
G1
m
9
0
z
C)
r
G)
m
Z
0
}
t
t
t
t
t
LBEMARLE RESTORATIONS, LLC
WETLAND RESTORATION,
STREAM RESTORATION, &
WILDLIFE HABITAT CREATION
P.O. BOX 176 FAIRFIELD, NC 27826
(252) 333 -0249 FAX [phone]
>>
x ..
HUDSON PROPERTY
m
m
GRADING PLAN
N
�
BEAUFORT CO., NC
EEP PROJECT ID: 95361
EEP CONTRACT #:004638
°
°
A
till iitt++Al�R..0i61Rle
cn
C
m
m
O
O
z
0
C
70
I
1
v
O
m
I
00
O
C
z
D
3
Y
r
z
m
v
D
G)
m
3
C)
r
z
m
D
G1
m
9
0
z
C)
r
G)
m
Z
0
}
t
t
t
t
t
LBEMARLE RESTORATIONS, LLC
WETLAND RESTORATION,
STREAM RESTORATION, &
WILDLIFE HABITAT CREATION
P.O. BOX 176 FAIRFIELD, NC 27826
(252) 333 -0249 FAX [phone]

O
0
m C)
N M
;o 0
-1 >
ro-
V) C)
D Lf)
> > M
r - r
m rn
0
C) = z
X II Z
rn
O -n
m
m
---f
NOLLVAIII
w w w w w
CD C) pli -01 m 00
70
m
0
H
m
NOUVA11:1
CD
CD
U)
0 > +
�u Z
< n
M N M
;q
>
0
Z
D > > 0
r- r- Z
U) U) G)
n
> > M CD
r m
m
0
X C) 2! II 0) z
O -n
m +
M ul
--i C)
NOUVA�ll w
-P, CD
00 (D N -4. m 00 (D NJ CD
O
O
m
X
0..
0
r-
Lrl
C)
( C)
o
m m
Ln I IN= 10 C) C)
Ln
C)
N-IR-offi
00
LrI
C)
00
I—,
LrI
7K
0
C
o Uq
a
70
V)
m
m
co
>
0
T
r)
'C)
;o
>
m N
;10
> ;o
0
0
M
;q 0
i Z >
+
—
—
—
C)
--j r- > 0
r)
CD
CD
C)
-0
0
M
Z 0
>
U')
V)
00
Lf) C) In G)
Lr)
iol
n
> > m
r
m
Lrl
m
C)
V)
0
-n
8 Z
x
Cy)
Lri
C)
--J
-n
m
r)
oz
70 m
m
0
0
-0
0
CD
A
o
Ln
C)
N-IR-offi
00
LrI
C)
00
I—,
(f)
m
7K
0
C
a
70
m
m
co
>
O
T
r)
'C)
;o
>
x
;10
> ;o
0
0
z
0
V) 0
-0
C)
-0
0
-n
-n
C)
-0
0
M
Z 0
I
U')
V)
00
z
Lr)
+
w
m
Lrl
r-
C)
C)
■
-0
m
Ln
rj
0
r'j m
O
0 m
0 ul)
m
>
m
-n
n Scn
r
m
10
r-n
C� C)
c:)
+
C)
C)
I
4�1
+
C)
C)
X
m
F"
90
X
m
0
n
m
Lr)
O
m
r-
m
C)
m
ALBEMARLE RESTORATIONS, LLC I
WETLAND RESTORATION,
STREAM RESTORATION, &
WILDLIFE HABITAT CREATION
P.O. BOX 176 FAIRFIELD, NC 27826
L [phone] FAX [phone]
-0
co
m
-0
m -0
;o
>
x
;10
> ;o
0
0
z
0
V) 0
-0
a
0
-0
0
-n
-n
-0
0
M
Z 0
U')
V)
c
z
Lr)
m L/)
V)
0
m
m
r-
C)
m
z m
-n
0
>
r)
oz
0
0
-0
0
T.
A
o
m
m
j m
C
'i m
;a
;V
Do
0
<
>
a
T
-n
>
2!
n
r-
0
m
m
2!
X
m
F"
90
X
m
0
n
m
Lr)
O
m
r-
m
C)
m
ALBEMARLE RESTORATIONS, LLC I
WETLAND RESTORATION,
STREAM RESTORATION, &
WILDLIFE HABITAT CREATION
P.O. BOX 176 FAIRFIELD, NC 27826
L [phone] FAX [phone]
HUDSON PROPERTY
DETAILS & SECTIONS
BEAUFORT CO., NC
EEP PROJECT ID: 95361
EEP CONTRACT #:004638
X
m
F"
90
X
m
0
n
m
Lr)
O
m
r-
m
C)
m
ALBEMARLE RESTORATIONS, LLC I
WETLAND RESTORATION,
STREAM RESTORATION, &
WILDLIFE HABITAT CREATION
P.O. BOX 176 FAIRFIELD, NC 27826
L [phone] FAX [phone]

NOLLVAI13
O 00 O N -i�- 0) 00
...... �T l ITT]
O
Ln
C)
+ 0
v
C) O
N
O
O
D
ni G) z
v1' D
O rn
NOI-LVAIII
O O N 4h. 0) 00 O
°
Ln
O
0
0
+
to
o O
v
_ O
M
0
N r- O
C)
T_... O
O i
Lrl
0
O
cn
+
cn
O
rn
O
0
�
0
�
70
M
I
�
I�
n
_e
rn
p
Z
(
+
cr
r
D
0
P
M
M
+-
p
o
'
�
0
=
=
n D
o
< n
_�.
m
QO
n
I
Cr7
O
rn0rn
0
0
v
7o z
Z <
�rn
m
M
� � D
m y
rn
O
� O
z
0
oova�
n> 0
w
-,0,
r
� z D
w
4pf
>�z
+
^�
_
O
i n�0
+
Ln
O
°o
EEP CONTRACT #:004638
Dr- z
po
rn
��G7
n n cn
rn
m �
M
-a m cn G)
o
D D
rnrn�
_:m
I
n n�
�DDrn
0
,� o
:- -m
O rn rn
,r,n
O
CD - z
�,�
?
..
-n 0
u,
o
X II +
z
+
!
p
I--I O - z
�— X II
+
A
rn
°-rn
�
°
Lr) M
M rnz
cn
o
z
C
w
Cr
o M
rn
p
m
0
D
Z
-n
T
+
r
rn
O
+
rn
CD
�
z
�
O
JZ
< U
L:_
+ I
Lry
+
o
o
Lrl
0
O
cn
+
cn
O
rn
O
0
v
Ln ,
0 0` 0� .
O
rn Gl
70
D
C
O C
� r
-" O
rn
0
0
�
0
�
70
M
I
�
I�
n
_e
rn
p
Z
(
"--I
cr
r
D
0
M
M
D
HUDSON PROPERTY
0
=
_�.
m
QO
n
I
Cr7
m
0
v
a
m
M
v
m y
r
O
O
z
BEAUFORT CO., NC
O
U) 0
3
r
cn
n
t, p
m
O
O
z
O
M
EEP CONTRACT #:004638
c
�
m �
M
r
o
c�
,r,n
o
z
Z
O
O
'
p
A
Lr) M
z
A
p
m
0
D
Z
-n
T
n
r
O
M
rn
_ _
z
I
v
Ln ,
0 0` 0� .
O
rn Gl
70
D
C
O C
� r
-" O
rn
0
0
D
C7
rn
rn
O �__
CD o
70
M
o1
n
_e
rn
p
Z
"--I
cr
r
D
0
M
M
D
HUDSON PROPERTY
0
=
_�.
m
QO
n
Cr7
m
DETAILS & SECTIONS
m
�
N
_
BEAUFORT CO., NC
0
n
t, p
EEP PROJECT ID: 95361
d
F---I
EEP CONTRACT #:004638
N
o
A
M
D
C7
rn
rn
O �__
CD o
70
M
o1
n
_e
rn
p
Z
"--I
W
r
D
0
M
M
D
0
=
_�.
m
QO
n
_
0
n
F---I
M
LBEMARLE RESTORATIONS, LLC
WETLAND RESTORATION,
STREAM RESTORATION, &
WILDLIFE HABITAT CREATION
P.O. BOX 176 FAIRFIELD, NC 27826
(252) 333 -0249 FAX [phone]

NOUVA313
Ul 0� V 00 �o O r N
O
0o
0
0 0
0
O
O D
T N T °
0
0
D D m
rn m o
�• O
X II
N z
o m
m
N
0
0
a,
0
00
0
O
� 1
IT! 1
( n-0
O
m �o
( D
( m
( D
( �
m
U)
i
a
O
V r
rn
O
O
v
T
n
rrr
I
1
I ,
1 �
1 m
I � I
Z �
1 m
1
i
I
i
i
N011dA313
F, V co to O r N W
? O
W
00
O
0
0
_ � o
O D
70 Z
rn NO rn
r-
0
D Z
DD m o
m..
W . �-• O
+ x II z
cD O m
I o
41
O
0
0
0
0
I
m
Cv I
< I
O 1
< I
1
T
m
I
1 X
I In
z
G7
i
i
1 m
No
NOLLVA313
00 ko O r N ) W -A cn
1
I
do
O
i
I
� I
U1
i
O XX
I x
Ln
I
Z
s I Gi
iii
O
m
j 31
E I
I
I
� o
O D /
�o Z
m 0 m /
��o I
0
D Dr Z
r Ln Gl 0
DD m `
mm9
Lrl O
xNz I
Qm NO 1
M 0
Ln O
Iv m I p
v
+ II o I
o
0
0 !1 G
< I m i
o _
o- HUDSON PROPERTY
m DETAILS & SECTIONS
m BEAUFORT CO., NC
y °z �j EEP PROJECT ID: 95361
EEP CONTRACT #:004638
m PROOPA
W
0
o
0
X
D
0
O
O
O
n
O
U1
rn^
l J
O
'z^
V '
J
9
0 00 x o
n
0 00 z O
D r
0 Orn O
T m
T �
r
m
m
q
O
z
m
m
z
0
LBEMARLE RESTORATIONS, LLC
WETLAND RESTORATION,
STREAM RESTORATION, &
WILDLIFE HABITAT CREATION
P.O. BOX 176 FAIRFIELD, NC 27826
(252) 333 -0249 FAX [phone]
CD
41
O
0
0
0
0
I
m
Cv I
< I
O 1
< I
1
T
m
I
1 X
I In
z
G7
i
i
1 m
No
NOLLVA313
00 ko O r N ) W -A cn
1
I
do
O
i
I
� I
U1
i
O XX
I x
Ln
I
Z
s I Gi
iii
O
m
j 31
E I
I
I
� o
O D /
�o Z
m 0 m /
��o I
0
D Dr Z
r Ln Gl 0
DD m `
mm9
Lrl O
xNz I
Qm NO 1
M 0
Ln O
Iv m I p
v
+ II o I
o
0
0 !1 G
< I m i
o _
o- HUDSON PROPERTY
m DETAILS & SECTIONS
m BEAUFORT CO., NC
y °z �j EEP PROJECT ID: 95361
EEP CONTRACT #:004638
m PROOPA
W
0
o
0
X
D
0
O
O
O
n
O
U1
rn^
l J
O
'z^
V '
J
9
0 00 x o
n
0 00 z O
D r
0 Orn O
T m
T �
r
m
m
q
O
z
m
m
z
0
LBEMARLE RESTORATIONS, LLC
WETLAND RESTORATION,
STREAM RESTORATION, &
WILDLIFE HABITAT CREATION
P.O. BOX 176 FAIRFIELD, NC 27826
(252) 333 -0249 FAX [phone]
No
NOLLVA313
00 ko O r N ) W -A cn
1
I
do
O
i
I
� I
U1
i
O XX
I x
Ln
I
Z
s I Gi
iii
O
m
j 31
E I
I
I
� o
O D /
�o Z
m 0 m /
��o I
0
D Dr Z
r Ln Gl 0
DD m `
mm9
Lrl O
xNz I
Qm NO 1
M 0
Ln O
Iv m I p
v
+ II o I
o
0
0 !1 G
< I m i
o _
o- HUDSON PROPERTY
m DETAILS & SECTIONS
m BEAUFORT CO., NC
y °z �j EEP PROJECT ID: 95361
EEP CONTRACT #:004638
m PROOPA
W
0
o
0
X
D
0
O
O
O
n
O
U1
rn^
l J
O
'z^
V '
J
9
0 00 x o
n
0 00 z O
D r
0 Orn O
T m
T �
r
m
m
q
O
z
m
m
z
0
LBEMARLE RESTORATIONS, LLC
WETLAND RESTORATION,
STREAM RESTORATION, &
WILDLIFE HABITAT CREATION
P.O. BOX 176 FAIRFIELD, NC 27826
(252) 333 -0249 FAX [phone]
o- HUDSON PROPERTY
m DETAILS & SECTIONS
m BEAUFORT CO., NC
y °z �j EEP PROJECT ID: 95361
EEP CONTRACT #:004638
m PROOPA
W
0
o
0
X
D
0
O
O
O
n
O
U1
rn^
l J
O
'z^
V '
J
9
0 00 x o
n
0 00 z O
D r
0 Orn O
T m
T �
r
m
m
q
O
z
m
m
z
0
LBEMARLE RESTORATIONS, LLC
WETLAND RESTORATION,
STREAM RESTORATION, &
WILDLIFE HABITAT CREATION
P.O. BOX 176 FAIRFIELD, NC 27826
(252) 333 -0249 FAX [phone]
0
o
0
X
D
0
O
O
O
n
O
U1
rn^
l J
O
'z^
V '
J
9
0 00 x o
n
0 00 z O
D r
0 Orn O
T m
T �
r
m
m
q
O
z
m
m
z
0
LBEMARLE RESTORATIONS, LLC
WETLAND RESTORATION,
STREAM RESTORATION, &
WILDLIFE HABITAT CREATION
P.O. BOX 176 FAIRFIELD, NC 27826
(252) 333 -0249 FAX [phone]
m
q
O
z
m
m
z
0
LBEMARLE RESTORATIONS, LLC
WETLAND RESTORATION,
STREAM RESTORATION, &
WILDLIFE HABITAT CREATION
P.O. BOX 176 FAIRFIELD, NC 27826
(252) 333 -0249 FAX [phone]

O
CD
0
� O
< ;n
m rn
0 D
O
r r Z o
Dr m
rnrn9
Ln O
-z
x
N Z
O T
rn No
0
9
NOLLVA313
f+ N W -4 Ln m V 00 1D O r
N 011dA3l3
W .A Ln 01 V 00 � O N
o+
0
0
N
O
0
_ � o
0 D
<
rn n
N m
O� D
CD
� � r
O
O r r Z
O D D m °
rn m
0
Ln
-z
x z
N
O T
-m
m 41
--i ('
0
OD
°
°o
�
I
1
O
I
HUDSON PROPERTY
I
O
o
O
m
m
v
DETAILS & SECTIONS
I
O
rn
G)
_
I
En
0
V)
1
v
r
m
D
Z
m
x
v
;v
v
0
1
0
v
0 O
I
EEP CONTRACT #:004638
1
z
:
G7
I
0
D
Dr
0
1
1
°o
8
N
m
1
m
I
r
m
3
/
D
m
I
m
1
�
`1
1
m
1
1
i
I
1
1
1
n-V
I
O
1
1
1
1
m
x
�
�
On
1
1
Dm
O
m
v
1
v
DO
rn_.
O
v
i
G)
Ln
C)
i
<
I
1
<
m
V
En
m
1
i
m
r
1
90
m
m
1
z
1
x
n
1
C
90
C)
1
67
C)
m
v
1
m
1
1
N 011dA3l3
W .A Ln 01 V 00 � O N
o+
0
0
N
O
0
_ � o
0 D
<
rn n
N m
O� D
CD
� � r
O
O r r Z
O D D m °
rn m
0
Ln
-z
x z
N
O T
-m
m 41
--i ('
0
OD
°
°o
NOUVA11D
W lW/l M V 00 1D O r N
O�
°
Ln
+ 0 N
°O �
=-`i�
0 D
O < n
rn 0 m
Z D
� r
O
D C)0
D
D m
rnrn9
O
x
N Z
O T
- rn
qo
0
rn
°
I
O
HUDSON PROPERTY
I
o
O
m
m
v
DETAILS & SECTIONS
I
O
rn
G)
_
I
En
0
0
BEAUFORT CO., NC
v
r
v
D
Z
m
x
v
;v
v
0
1
0
O
0 O
�
EEP CONTRACT #:004638
1
z
:
m
I
0
D
Dr
1
I
1
1
°o
8
N
m
G)
T
T
m
r
m
3
/
D
m
m
1
�
1
m
1
i
1
1
1
QO
I
O
1
1
1
m
x
�E
On
1
Dm
O
m
v
1
v
rn_.
O
i
G)
Ln
I
1
<
1
V
En
i
m
r
1
90
m
m
1
x
1
z
67
C)
v
1
m
1
NOUVA11D
W lW/l M V 00 1D O r N
O�
°
Ln
+ 0 N
°O �
=-`i�
0 D
O < n
rn 0 m
Z D
� r
O
D C)0
D
D m
rnrn9
O
x
N Z
O T
- rn
qo
0
rn
°
X
m
/DJ
�
l
2
-P I�
O
O n
o
O
0
U7
m
In
H
0
,z^
V
O
HUDSON PROPERTY
I
o
m
m
v
DETAILS & SECTIONS
I
rn
G)
_
I
0
0
BEAUFORT CO., NC
v
r
v
D
Z
m
x
v
;v
EEP PROJECT ID: 95361
0
00
0
O
0 O
rn
EEP CONTRACT #:004638
I
1
z
:
I
0
D
Dr
1
1
°o
8
N
m
G)
T
T
m
r
m
3
/
D
m
m
1
�
1
m
1
1
QO
I
1
1
m
x
z
i
G)
I
I
v
i
m
1
1
X
m
/DJ
�
l
2
-P I�
O
O n
o
O
0
U7
m
In
H
0
,z^
V
HUDSON PROPERTY
o
m
m
DETAILS & SECTIONS
rn
_
0
0
BEAUFORT CO., NC
z
r
v
D
Z
m
x
v
;v
EEP PROJECT ID: 95361
0
00
0
O
0 O
a^ m
EEP CONTRACT #:004638
Z
z
:
G)
0
D
Dr
X
m
/DJ
�
l
2
-P I�
O
O n
o
O
0
U7
m
In
H
0
,z^
V
LBEMARLE RESTORATIONS, LLC
WETLAND RESTORATION,
STREAM RESTORATION, &
WILDLIFE HABITAT CREATION
P.O. BOX 176 FAIRFIELD. NC 27826
(252) 333 -0249 FAX [phone]
m
k
0
z
r
v
D
Z
m
x
v
;v
m
G)
0
00
0
O
0 O
O
Z
z
G)
0
D
Dr
G)
o
8
N
m
G)
T
T
m
r
m
LBEMARLE RESTORATIONS, LLC
WETLAND RESTORATION,
STREAM RESTORATION, &
WILDLIFE HABITAT CREATION
P.O. BOX 176 FAIRFIELD. NC 27826
(252) 333 -0249 FAX [phone]

NOUVA113
O r N W � vi al V W
O
v a
O D
;10 < n
m rn
z D
0 r
D r- Oz
r U) G) o
D D m
m rn
O
Ln
x II
=z
N z
� rn
m N
O
0
rn
0
V
01
l�
01
O
I
v
~ N
_ ul) O
O D
<�n
m m
r
r- C)
O
r
O
D r rn
rn ..
�­ O
..
-z
x II —
N z
o m
N
O
0
E
NOLLVAI13
r N W ? Ul 0� V co to 0
TV
O
x
O
HUDSON PROPERTY
0
-0
O
v
O
U)
O
m
m
BEAUFORT CO., NC
Ln
v
z
°
G)
v
0
1
wtem
y�EEP
1000!!!
CONTRACT #:004638
o
PROGRAllM::
1
i
1
1
r
�
�
1
m
v7
r n-
I
1
r
i
1
�
0
o
z 0
x
Grni
O
v
�
0
m
0
0
00
z
o
of
1
O
0
0
o
�
o
rn
cn
3 r
'-
1
I
G)
O
00
D
0
1
Ln
v
I
1
;-_i
z
O
z
G
I
G�
I
r
m
V)
ul-
�
I
m
m
m
x
1
V
01
l�
01
O
I
v
~ N
_ ul) O
O D
<�n
m m
r
r- C)
O
r
O
D r rn
rn ..
�­ O
..
-z
x II —
N z
o m
N
O
0
E
NOLLVAI13
r N W ? Ul 0� V co to 0
X
m
^D
\ /
2
O
O
O O
CD
Fe A
'wX
V )
m
0
z
O
x
HUDSON PROPERTY
m
C17
O
m
_
DETAILS & SECTIONS
U)
m
BEAUFORT CO., NC
v
z
EEP PROJECT ID: 95361
G)
0
1
wtem
y�EEP
1000!!!
CONTRACT #:004638
PROGRAllM::
1
i
1
1
�
�
1
I
1
r
i
1
�
0
o
z 0
x
Grni
O
v
�
0
m
0
0
00
z
o
of
1
O
0
0
o
�
o
U)
cn
3 r
'-
I
G)
O
00
D
0
v
1
°
z
O
DJ
G
r
m
V)
r
m
m
x
ter,
z
6)
C)
1
v
�
m
X
m
^D
\ /
2
O
O
O O
CD
Fe A
'wX
V )
m
0
z
ALBEMARLE RESTORATIONS, LLC
WETLAND RESTORATION,
STREAM RESTORATION, &
WILDLIFE HABITAT CREATION
P.O. BOX 176 FAIRFIELD, NC 27826
(252) 333 -0249 FAX [phone]
x
HUDSON PROPERTY
m
C17
m
_
DETAILS & SECTIONS
BEAUFORT CO., NC
z
EEP PROJECT ID: 95361
wtem
y�EEP
1000!!!
CONTRACT #:004638
PROGRAllM::
z
r
0
o
z 0
x
Grni
v
�
0
m
0
0
00
z
o
of
0
0
o
�
o
cn
3 r
'-
G)
O
00
D
0
m
°
z
z
DJ
G
T
m
m
V)
r
m
ALBEMARLE RESTORATIONS, LLC
WETLAND RESTORATION,
STREAM RESTORATION, &
WILDLIFE HABITAT CREATION
P.O. BOX 176 FAIRFIELD, NC 27826
(252) 333 -0249 FAX [phone]
x
HUDSON PROPERTY
m
C17
m
_
DETAILS & SECTIONS
BEAUFORT CO., NC
z
EEP PROJECT ID: 95361
wtem
y�EEP
1000!!!
CONTRACT #:004638
PROGRAllM::
ALBEMARLE RESTORATIONS, LLC
WETLAND RESTORATION,
STREAM RESTORATION, &
WILDLIFE HABITAT CREATION
P.O. BOX 176 FAIRFIELD, NC 27826
(252) 333 -0249 FAX [phone]

Fll
4
Cl
N
0
2 -V)j
O D
< � n
M N M
Z D
D� r
D O
0
D D m
m rn
L =z
x II r
N z
o M
M
-i °
0
0
NOLLVA313
W 11 Vl 01 V 00 �D O t+ N W
N
O
O
O
O
NOLLVAI13
W W W W W W 0
-P V7 01 V 00 t0 O r N W -A
01
O
0
0 N
U-) o
O D
< rl n
m m
;o z D
iO
D
r- z
DD m o
M !7
O,1
� =z
x n
N z
o-n
-rn pli
� °
0
0
I
I
I
m
�
I
I
I
I
I
x
HUDSON PROPERTY
7,1
m
I
m
O
DETAILS & SECTIONS
o
BEAUFORT CO., NC
_z
o
�{
EEP PROJECT ID: 95361
C�
O
n O
O
1 cosill.stem
ll.
EEP CONTRACT #:004638
D r
I
O
m
m
� D
IT)
G)
0
T
m
m
r
m
I
O
O
Ln
I
v'
rn
i
v
v
�
v
<
I
rn
i
m
I
<
I
I
D
I
D
m
m
V)
/
Qo
Ip
1
I
I
I
�
i
I
1
I
1
O
0
i
O
I
m
Ln
1
v
�
I
O
I
O
O
0
x
v
I
v
I
T
I
i
C)
T
I
m
r
rn
IT)
I
m
1
m
I
N
O
O
O
O
NOLLVAI13
W W W W W W 0
-P V7 01 V 00 t0 O r N W -A
01
O
0
0 N
U-) o
O D
< rl n
m m
;o z D
iO
D
r- z
DD m o
M !7
O,1
� =z
x n
N z
o-n
-rn pli
� °
0
0
y
I
i
I
I
I
m
I
I
I
x
HUDSON PROPERTY
7,1
m
m
DETAILS & SECTIONS
o
BEAUFORT CO., NC
_z
x
�{
EEP PROJECT ID: 95361
C�
O
n O
O
1 cosill.stem
ll.
EEP CONTRACT #:004638
D r
J
O
0
m
� D
IT)
G)
T
m
m
r
m
O
Ln
i
v
�
<
i
m
I
D
/
m
V)
/
Qo
1
I
1
1
i
I
1
0
O
Ln
�
I
O
I
O
O
v
Ln
v
I
T
I
v
I
m
rn
y
I
i
HUDSON PROPERTY
7,1
m
m
DETAILS & SECTIONS
o
BEAUFORT CO., NC
x
�{
EEP PROJECT ID: 95361
O -0
O
n O
O
1 cosill.stem
ll.
EEP CONTRACT #:004638
D r
J
O
0
m
� D
IT)
O
O
O
0
X
(D`
\T/
1
N
^
l 1
x
0
V)
^m
l I
0
z
V)
v7
m
q
O
z
r
m
G)
m
z
0
ALBEMARLE RESTORATIONS, LLC
WETLAND RESTORATION,
STREAM RESTORATION, &
WILDLIFE HABITAT CREATION
P.O. BOX 176 FAIRFIELD. NC 27826
(252) 333 -0249 FAX [phone]
I
i
x
0
p 0
O -0
O
n O
O
O
z
D r
G)
O
0
m
� D
IT)
G)
T
m
m
r
m
X
(D`
\T/
1
N
^
l 1
x
0
V)
^m
l I
0
z
V)
v7
m
q
O
z
r
m
G)
m
z
0
ALBEMARLE RESTORATIONS, LLC
WETLAND RESTORATION,
STREAM RESTORATION, &
WILDLIFE HABITAT CREATION
P.O. BOX 176 FAIRFIELD. NC 27826
(252) 333 -0249 FAX [phone]

NOLL`dAlll
W -A Ln M V 00 �o O r
O�
O
Co
p
Ln
_ � O
O D
<�n
m m
D Oz
r U)
D r) m o
rnrn9
O
x =z
n z
rn
O T
m
N
O
0
0,
0
-P
O
O
O
O
NOUVAlll
W UW7 00 �o O - N
GD
O
0
0
� O
O D
<11
m 0 rn n
z D
O
r r G)
D D m o
rn m
�-• O
=z
x II z
rn
om
m
� o
0
� ` I
I
I
� I
O
X
I
I
m
Ln
HUDSON PROPERTY
Ln
m
p
G7
r
O
0
�
G)
a
G�
G7
ml
I
z
0
0
O Ln
z
1
1
1
3
BEAUFORT CO., NC
p
mm
I
I
>
m
m
}.
X
i
G)
rn
r
m
LBEMARLE RESTORATIONS, LLC
WETLAND RESTORATION,
EEP CONTRACT #:004638
I
I
P.O. BOX 176 FAIRFIELD, NC 27826
�
'
J
i
V^Ik i9GRAM
z
Ln
90
-P
O
O
O
O
NOUVAlll
W UW7 00 �o O - N
GD
O
0
0
� O
O D
<11
m 0 rn n
z D
O
r r G)
D D m o
rn m
�-• O
=z
x II z
rn
om
m
� o
0
� ` I
I
� I
��\
X
I
I
m
Ln
HUDSON PROPERTY
z
G7
r
z� X �
G)
O 00 O
G7
ml
'
z
O Ln
z
1
1
1
BEAUFORT CO., NC
mm
1
}.
X
i
r
m
LBEMARLE RESTORATIONS, LLC
WETLAND RESTORATION,
EEP CONTRACT #:004638
1
P.O. BOX 176 FAIRFIELD, NC 27826
(252) 333 -0249 FAX [phone]
'
J
1
V^Ik i9GRAM
z
i
0
0
I
m
0
I
O
1
>M
1
m
1
1
b
0
v
`
�<
i
,
1
m
O
0
1
<
0
1
I
0
1
°
0
fn
T
m
m
m
,
-)
-P
O
O
O
O
NOUVAlll
W UW7 00 �o O - N
GD
O
0
0
� O
O D
<11
m 0 rn n
z D
O
r r G)
D D m o
rn m
�-• O
=z
x II z
rn
om
m
� o
0
W
CD
CD
O
O
m
C)
N
^
l J
70
0
V
m
I—q
0
z
� ` I
I
� I
��\
X
I
I
m
Ln
HUDSON PROPERTY
z
G7
r
z� X �
G)
O 00 O
G7
ml
'
z
O Ln
z
0
BEAUFORT CO., NC
mm
}.
EEP PROJECT ID: 95361
i
r
m
LBEMARLE RESTORATIONS, LLC
WETLAND RESTORATION,
EEP CONTRACT #:004638
i
f
P.O. BOX 176 FAIRFIELD, NC 27826
(252) 333 -0249 FAX [phone]
'
J
V^Ik i9GRAM
i
I
1
0
1
>M
1
1
b
0
`
�<
0
,
m
1
0
I
0
1
°
0
fn
T
m
m
m
1
W
CD
CD
O
O
m
C)
N
^
l J
70
0
V
m
I—q
0
z
� ` I
� I
��\
I
m
HUDSON PROPERTY
z
r
z� X �
G)
O 00 O
DETAILS & SECTIONS
ml
O n O O
z
O Ln
z
0
BEAUFORT CO., NC
mm
}.
EEP PROJECT ID: 95361
T m
rn
r
m
LBEMARLE RESTORATIONS, LLC
WETLAND RESTORATION,
EEP CONTRACT #:004638
WILDLIFE HABITAT CREATION
P.O. BOX 176 FAIRFIELD, NC 27826
(252) 333 -0249 FAX [phone]
'
J
V^Ik i9GRAM
W
CD
CD
O
O
m
C)
N
^
l J
70
0
V
m
I—q
0
z
� ` I
� I
��\
I
m
q
0
z
r
z� X �
G)
O 00 O
O n O O
z
O Ln
z
mm
T m
rn
r
m
LBEMARLE RESTORATIONS, LLC
WETLAND RESTORATION,
STREAM RESTORATION, &
WILDLIFE HABITAT CREATION
P.O. BOX 176 FAIRFIELD, NC 27826
(252) 333 -0249 FAX [phone]

nip
0
NOLL`dA313 NOLLVA313
(Wf7 V 00 �0 O r N W 41
Ln 0� V 00 �0 O N W
� � I
NOLLVA313
i
� I
� \
i-N
uq
m
v
00
t0
O
N
W
00
0
q
0
I
r
I
1
r
z 7 x
x�
0 00 �, 0
m
� n
0
z O
z
o
00
/
� I
v �o v
0 D G c0
0
x '
0 m
i
7
`
T m
T Lr)
r
m
O
WETLAND RESTORATION,
STREAM RESTORATION, &
WILDLIFE HABITAT CREATION
P.O. BOX 176 FAIRFIELD, NC 27826
(252) 333 -0249 - FAX [phone]
1
�
G7
v
rn
o
0
O
1
I
�0
0
3
0
1
Ln
3
D
O
1
�
m
O`rr
I
1
G
o
a,
m
v
m
m
m
°
1
cn
D
Ln
D
c�
1
1
0
1
v
v
1
;a
0
m
1
9
rn
m
/
90
00
00
1
m
O D
/
;az
N
/
0 D
/
r-
0
G
r- �
nDm°
-•
D
--
m
rn rn
O
\
=z
x
\
II z
O -t
- m
�C
nip
0
NOLL`dA313 NOLLVA313
(Wf7 V 00 �0 O r N W 41
Ln 0� V 00 �0 O N W
� � I
i
� I
� \
I
I
1
1
I
�\
q
0
I
r
I
1
r
z 7 x
x�
0 00 �, 0
m
� n
0
z O
z
o
00
� I
v �o v
0 D G c0
0
x '
0 m
i
7
`
T m
T Lr)
r
m
Z
WETLAND RESTORATION,
STREAM RESTORATION, &
WILDLIFE HABITAT CREATION
P.O. BOX 176 FAIRFIELD, NC 27826
(252) 333 -0249 - FAX [phone]
1
�
G7
v
rn
o
1
\
0
0
1
3
D
O
1
m
O`rr
1
a,
m
v
m
m
°
1
cn
D
c�
1
1
0
1
v
v
1
;a
0
1
9
rn
m
00
0
1
nip
0
NOLL`dA313 NOLLVA313
(Wf7 V 00 �0 O r N W 41
Ln 0� V 00 �0 O N W
HUDSON PROPERTY
DETAILS & SECTIONS
BEAUFORT CO., NC
EEP PROJECT ID: 95361
EEP CONTRACT #:004638
0�
O
0
N
O
Ln
70z
m NO rn
z D
+O ��Oo
O D � rn
O m ..
�-- O
Lri
x II
N Z
O T
- rnN
mo
0
x
D
W
w 0 N
U)
(f)
m
H
0
,Z
V
� � I
� I
� \
I
I
1
rn
I
�\
q
0
I
r
I
r
z 7 x
rn
G)
0 00 �, 0
m
� n
0
z O
z
o
00
v �o v
0 D G c0
0
x '
0 m
i
7
`
T m
T Lr)
r
m
Z
WETLAND RESTORATION,
STREAM RESTORATION, &
WILDLIFE HABITAT CREATION
P.O. BOX 176 FAIRFIELD, NC 27826
(252) 333 -0249 - FAX [phone]
v
rn
\
0
I
D
O
m
O`rr
m
v
m
1
cn
D
1
v
0
1
v
1
;a
0
1
9
rn
v
1
m
1
HUDSON PROPERTY
DETAILS & SECTIONS
BEAUFORT CO., NC
EEP PROJECT ID: 95361
EEP CONTRACT #:004638
0�
O
0
N
O
Ln
70z
m NO rn
z D
+O ��Oo
O D � rn
O m ..
�-- O
Lri
x II
N Z
O T
- rnN
mo
0
x
D
W
w 0 N
U)
(f)
m
H
0
,Z
V
� � I
� I
� \
I
\�
rn
I
�\
q
0
I
r
z 7 x
rn
G)
0 00 �, 0
m
� n
0
z O
z
o
00
v �o v
0 D G c0
0
0 m
7
T m
T Lr)
r
m
LBEMARLE RESTORATIONS, LLC
WETLAND RESTORATION,
STREAM RESTORATION, &
WILDLIFE HABITAT CREATION
P.O. BOX 176 FAIRFIELD, NC 27826
(252) 333 -0249 - FAX [phone]

Oi
O
.A
0
0 o
�
2
O D
< n
rn ON rn
Z D
r
D r OZ
r V o
Dr rn
mrn9
NCO
- Z
x II z
N
O T
- m N
- o
0
E
NOI-LVA313
W .A Ul M V OWO kD O
-p
O
O
O
O
E
-P
O
0 N
0
O D
< ii n
m m
z D
O
D r Z
r U) G o
D r m
r rn
rn
O
=z
x II z
N
O T
- m
rn ^, o
0
0
NOUVA913
W 4, Ul Q) V 07 �O O N N W
I
I
I
I
*.Y?'.
I
/
HUDSON PROPERTY
/
rli
v
L'
DETAILS & SECTIONS
0
N
s0
BEAUFORT CO:, NC
(n
m
0
1
EEP PROJECT ID. 95361
C7
C7
0
N
c�[T�L
xos �` ` to
J
D
`p
v
m
O
1
m
71
7
O
v
\
I
-Ln
/
m
1
�
i
o
I
n
r
11
j
I
x
3
1
�
I
z
1
a
z
ci
c�
I
C)
I
0
v
I
m
O
1
I
I
I
I
-p
O
O
O
O
E
-P
O
0 N
0
O D
< ii n
m m
z D
O
D r Z
r U) G o
D r m
r rn
rn
O
=z
x II z
N
O T
- m
rn ^, o
0
0
NOUVA913
W 4, Ul Q) V 07 �O O N N W
O
O
Ln
m
v
07
O
r
ff
/
HUDSON PROPERTY
/
rli
L'
DETAILS & SECTIONS
N
BEAUFORT CO:, NC
°
1
EEP PROJECT ID. 95361
C7
0
N
c�[T�L
xos �` ` to
J
EEP CONTRACT #:004638
`p
6�RAGRAM
O
1
m
71
7
v
\
I
/
v
m
n
O
3
1
1
a
z
ci
0
X_
1
O
1
m
v
z
�
1
1
O
o
v
m
I
1
I
n
T
r
m
O
O
Ln
m
v
07
O
r
ff
W
O
O
CD
CD
D
0 Z 0
0
O o0
m '-" m
v � v
Q -D{ <
O -i m
< D
;a 7�
m m
T Lr)
r
m
x ;a
O
z On
C) m
C�
z
Cl
X
r)
2
n
X
0
V)
m
r)
J
0
z
m
q
O
z
r
m
C)
m
v
LBEMARLE RESTORATIONS, LLC
WETLAND RESTORATION,
STREAM RESTORATION, &
WILDLIFE HABITAT CREATION
P.O. BOX 176 FAIRFIELD, NC 27826
(252) 333 -0249 FAX [phone]
HUDSON PROPERTY
rli
A
DETAILS & SECTIONS
N
BEAUFORT CO:, NC
°
1
EEP PROJECT ID. 95361
C7
N
c�[T�L
xos �` ` to
J
EEP CONTRACT #:004638
`p
6�RAGRAM
W
O
O
CD
CD
D
0 Z 0
0
O o0
m '-" m
v � v
Q -D{ <
O -i m
< D
;a 7�
m m
T Lr)
r
m
x ;a
O
z On
C) m
C�
z
Cl
X
r)
2
n
X
0
V)
m
r)
J
0
z
m
q
O
z
r
m
C)
m
v
LBEMARLE RESTORATIONS, LLC
WETLAND RESTORATION,
STREAM RESTORATION, &
WILDLIFE HABITAT CREATION
P.O. BOX 176 FAIRFIELD, NC 27826
(252) 333 -0249 FAX [phone]

C
c
O D
< n
m rn
z D
O
D D Z
r Gl c
n D m
7.. 9
O
-z
x I� z
N
O_ T
rn oN
rn
0
0
NOLLVA313
w w w w w w w w w w as
O f+ N w .a Ln 01 V w %D O
N
O
O
O
O
C
C
o
O D
<11n
m m
Z D
--� r
DO
r- Z
r U) n a
D �
m
rnm2
O
Lri
-z
x II z
NJ
o T
m pl,
- o
Q
9
NOLLVAIII
Cl N N W CWJI V 000 1.0 O
X
70
00
O
v
0 O
r
i
r
1
r
r
r
I
m
z
HUDSON PROPERTY
DETAILS & SECTIONS
BEAUFORT CO., NC
EEP PROJECT ID: 95361
EEP CONTRACT #:004638
1�
n
0
n
I
z�
D
1
'0
m
P.O. BOX 176 FAIRFIELD, NC 27826
(252) 333 -0249 FAX [phone]
I
I
3O
I
v
"o
! L„
m
i
O
1
ET
I
D 0
O
10
I
D
m
z" I
r
�o
�m I
All
<
Ir
c
Ln
D
m
ao
to
�
I
�\
`
`
I
I
\
i
I
m
X
`s
I
I
I
i
0
i
z
i
v
O
�
G)
I
I
I
G1
O
I
I
m
O
o
I
rn
i
I
p
m
L
X
m
I
<
0
T.
i
z
o
T
m
I
r
m
<
I
�
1
T
1
m
1
N
O
O
O
O
C
C
o
O D
<11n
m m
Z D
--� r
DO
r- Z
r U) n a
D �
m
rnm2
O
Lri
-z
x II z
NJ
o T
m pl,
- o
Q
9
NOLLVAIII
Cl N N W CWJI V 000 1.0 O
O
v
O
m
O
O
O
0
T
T
r
m
O
O
O
O
z �
X
70
00
O
v
0 O
r
r
r
I
m
z
HUDSON PROPERTY
DETAILS & SECTIONS
BEAUFORT CO., NC
EEP PROJECT ID: 95361
EEP CONTRACT #:004638
3 0
D
m
n
0
n
z�
D
1
z
O
m
P.O. BOX 176 FAIRFIELD, NC 27826
(252) 333 -0249 FAX [phone]
I
n0
"o
1
I
O
D
Ln
r
�o
<
Ir
c
Ln
D
m
to
\
`s
I
I
i
0
i
v
O
�
I
I
m
-
I
O
I
rn
p
m
X
I
<
T.
i
z
X
T
m
r
m
0
m
O
v
O
m
O
O
O
0
T
T
r
m
O
O
O
O
z �
X
70
00
O
v
0 O
O
m
z
HUDSON PROPERTY
DETAILS & SECTIONS
BEAUFORT CO., NC
EEP PROJECT ID: 95361
EEP CONTRACT #:004638
3 0
D
m
n
0
n
z�
D
z
O
m
P.O. BOX 176 FAIRFIELD, NC 27826
(252) 333 -0249 FAX [phone]
X
n
J
Z
�
^
l J
X
0
V I
^m
l J
H
0
Z
(!)
Cn
m
q
O
z
r
m
m
y
m
C17
d
m
HUDSON PROPERTY
DETAILS & SECTIONS
BEAUFORT CO., NC
EEP PROJECT ID: 95361
EEP CONTRACT #:004638
ALBEMARLE RESTORATIONS, LLC
�-
r a
-
WETLAND RESTORATION,
STREAM RESTORATION, &
WILDLIFE HABITAT CREATION
P.O. BOX 176 FAIRFIELD, NC 27826
(252) 333 -0249 FAX [phone]

- V tT P =. U- O6 � W N F-` p
°
—Ca1 N 1--`
4.
,
6lFOm ?1X �n
z>00d
z
cn
A °'o av,� o d_i a Z
i 6naa
m vs-4
3 °1
�° 3 - -s��
p 7 i i °o�
c g3ii
'o 7 0 @ N (D nO 0 C
O O L
o 6
d
to ;cc am < r° aCT x
�3� ���o 2
m as
"� 6� So
y
9 gG
n w
0 o
fl! x-
-ow ='I Q
<°
v C Ol i)1 r
V� 3.c
7
3
N Z
rD Z
pj°'nrt CD n a
0
o ncm
cr Sr
W
o
c3 n x'0.0° `" _ = o
s° vi
a
o
•�, F
Z
a m
O 0
00
in
T
T
1
rt O rt
[D N �' '6 O p
a of
0=j
of
d a n m '00 0. m O 7
Oj N
N
v)
7° Q 6 0 O� c 3
t0
0 I
IDn
I'D g
fo
X
3ON
art tn6�
In v0,
�c
0
=
- 3 c of to c@ c 3
rt 3 L
°� 6
a
C'_ a ° = rD d rD .�•• rt
Dl 0 3 O O C
C) � pOj N'
3 O G
°• O
to rD
7
rt
c a rt X c a
6
rt M rD
(D
m 4 ° n X fD A
C
ut ? rt g
n
(n 0)
7 to
O d N O O O
00 a 17 01
N (D '"
D
rt
N
0 3 c 01
CL - n =. rt r0
\ In
N' O W N
rD
7 a
Ort
=
=. I lD ] Q
W �t 0 r= i0 N
7
a I �-.
U9 O
.° 7
lD
7 O <0
n ut VI N
rD EA
7
Wr0•' o M o
rD
O N= 7
7 C n
A f-r
O (D
a
9
(°
m d
1'
a
Q Ma
ccpp
6
a
0`gV1rD��
ioq
3
j .�-1• c '=? to rD
01 N X 01
rr.
K
�. 2
= fD
nom° ID
p r*
<0'
iT
d.
rt N
am°rt' iD o
N n
330`
o
01'
EA
to fD c m
o
rt
o
,o 3 o
u c x
3
-h� U.0 N 3.
rt
n3,
01 rD= q
oGi
rb !� <' 3
a
N
7 0
fD Cni
2
V)
�
DJ C.
r0
n 3
f•
D
6 W
K� 3 ry $4
O
_0 Q
p
n0,
0
0
n r� Ol O
NArp'
(D to
a
o
!D rD
m
C.
fD 8
°
pO<p
a
(D
Cr
g m s
v
to
7r �,
= c
° c rD
r o
Q
°
a
m
w
rfo
z3 co
z
d
[D O
L] O
O
�
r0-r
O
o N
�
_. r* 3.
U3
3
co
E8 $4 x
TO
co
C
d
Q
N
rn Eq
C3
l
'
0
rc rD
�I
rD O
m
m
1
d
N n
Z
7
�
N
Q rt
as
r) o-
m
d t0 1
cn
°p
W
Lo
NI-D� --rS� C-) 8 Aao W 0 �';- V W
C O
e O O< p
? o Z CD O0- w w O C A o o=
ro o - r9 oo 0 3 q ro °' vw a ° n .�+ z
wz Cr
0 3 �o 3v� aaQ �oQ 3 0 o 0. IQ w N 7Ho
CD CD CD to
r, c, = EF w W O
° °� `� �' < oN 3' 0,-., w cOR o' Q a wi w
GQ a .7. O. w cc Z O'Q 'NS GOi rn �' n bq -Oi X N O O rn C
`O O C C rD rD `� '3 r)
m to o °
7 .y rD 0 •^.S. w W n O O O O
qQ vCDx w °_ n wi o a k a n "aQ w 0
CD CL F o ro --r' ro
�_ z� - 3tYo nw
3 w
m o c< fD 3 F ro °N. w CDa
CD rj
c C e ru a < rno - rho c r0o .7 � � ° �e
w 0 a aY
�� as is c
0 0 n a w a N 0 c
n 3 rNU x.
0 5 �" o n -o -0 °° o n
rD c < • ro 0 ro
o ° C a 5' a c° m °CQ 0 °» s.
CD CL
uq
oCQ O
n n 'o ro q a c 0 rD <
m • 4:1 o N ti
B a° o
o o co v y fl) O N
W ID
do cl `3 N ry
o
rP C '� N 'i C a w r.
a 47D a e uQ c w cl
° w
qQ X�o C
r5o oro CD
O N �' w .N•. �' ?
o o n 0 CD o r�o
C O rD ro ro rn °• C rho °' c o 0 °"
CD
n ID W 0 r� O
o aQ w
ca S
CD
3
n o a 3 DQ E o < rD
w x ° w • X w ca
E3 2 E5, a 0 w 0 Z
CD 0 o ro rc a�i r" � ° w rD
a ~ M `ly
O rD w
h- O G O •�i N r�D
CD "�Or O 0 C
G O
N w rho o ti 0 aCQ o c:
oD N a G. N v CD
W
ITJ
z
`zv
05.
T
r
o
�
z
T
v r
C
z
cn
o
o �
�<
W
p
m
m
mm °
°
oo m
t :..
z °
.
m
A Y' S�: 0
d ° °o
n
t.
r
Z
i +.,9!a.
00
in
T
T
1
N
°
�• I t
t
r 0
m
3 b 0Z
0
N
yWJ..
f•
(
N
IDn
I'D g
fo
X
3ON
C
°t
W z
>7- O O
rO z
a
1 uO 0
"
Z7
<
m =
r
.
m Z
ti
Y m a m� w m o
a
p z
D
w.s
m
cn
w� ro xo (D
--J 's'N
CD
0
f^
�dCD �drD O
0 �% �` O
CD
••'
O
Z
A .On+ -A
to R to "� J C a t7
m d
1'
a
Q Ma
z
o. o o =°
o.
O '.
d
D
m�� 0 3
_ �
r�D � O a N
0
o
rr.
z
0
<"�
r
d.
'� o
m
p'
o
fD rXO
b°
m O
Z p
T
3
-h� U.0 N 3.
3
a
m m �, y
umi
cn a
" w
O m
3
V)
�
Op L
f•
D
Ov,
D
T�
Zcn
3
0 w
m
1-
O�
5
w
=v
D
NKF L
o�0
0
c
uD
zN
o _
m m WID H
a
O
r"
--i
z3 co
z
o nc
c
W
ti
co
OG 3
TO
co
=I
N
rn Eq
CD zs
A
�I
0 ov'
m
m
Z
Z
rn
�
-n ro
as
r) o-
m
cn
cn
W
z(nr0
O S
L/) D m 0 m -i
3..
U) rnv�mmvrni
o.
c m
m r O r- p
a F
N
CD UQ
0 0
O
O r
r `< o 0
a
:
p m o
D 0 ° 3
m
O
° °
D
D 000 z
n 0
f
v �
co
A" m
A G) co 07�o
a 7C
r_•
to Z
v)0 z
_�O
° to
S1
co
D
rn W
v
2
p m p m
onITT
D �m
.,•,
C
m
m -x
m
y
�
Z
z z m m m
T N z
c
Ln m
s
Z A O
�v)m
W
O
-
O
O
N
0c
z m m m
---
—
z °
in °
HUDSON PROPERTY
DETAILS & SECTIONS
BEAUFORT CO., NC
EEP PROJECT ID: 95361
EEP CONTRACT #:004638
D
z
T
c
r
r
O
z
x O
O
°
v
z z
G) G)
z
z
z
G7
O
D
r
D
O
z
3
z
z
G)
O
0
O
O
O AT
D 3
Z
3 z
z
3 z
C �
3 0
o �
O
v
LBEMARLE RESTORATIONS, LLC
WILDLIFE WETLAND ABITATACREATION II
P.O. BOX 176 FAIRFIELD, NC 27826
(252) 333 -0249 FAX [phone]
C
O
cn
0
o w 52
yrho
rho
d ° °o
r,w�.) -
r
W
CD ro 0 0' py ro w
�' o' 5 -0
N
r
W r
N
3 b 0Z
0
N
IDn
I'D g
fo
X
3ON
C
z �
>7- O O
rO z
a
1 uO 0
"
;-1
0
O D
S
I
uq °
Z
Y m a m� w m o
a
p z
w� ro xo (D
--J 's'N
CD
�dCD �drD O
0 �% �` O
CD
�i:
1-J
Z
A .On+ -A
to R to "� J C a t7
w 0
x O' _.
a
Z
C GZ) 7AC
co D 3
o. o o =°
o.
d
D
m�� 0 3
_ �
r�D � O a N
0
o
rr.
z
0
�c o
m 3 n
-
oN o `'
d.
C
�_ a $ w o
N° 0 _ ti
fD rXO
b°
T
3
-h� U.0 N 3.
3
a
cn a
" w
�r,
V)
�
o w
0 ro
a 0
° ro DQ
z
D
T�
—
0 w
n
1-
w.o
5
w
i�
a
r"
--i
o nc
QoDOQ
Y
ti
CD
=I
CD zs
z
�I
0 ov'
o d
so 92.
0
CD
-n ro
as
r) o-
♦ G
o.
a F
N
CD UQ
a
O Y
m
O
a 7C
S
_�O
° to
ro
vQ
w
�
Z
O
N
HUDSON PROPERTY
DETAILS & SECTIONS
BEAUFORT CO., NC
EEP PROJECT ID: 95361
EEP CONTRACT #:004638
D
z
T
c
r
r
O
z
x O
O
°
v
z z
G) G)
z
z
z
G7
O
D
r
D
O
z
3
z
z
G)
O
0
O
O
O AT
D 3
Z
3 z
z
3 z
C �
3 0
o �
O
v
LBEMARLE RESTORATIONS, LLC
WILDLIFE WETLAND ABITATACREATION II
P.O. BOX 176 FAIRFIELD, NC 27826
(252) 333 -0249 FAX [phone]

D
rn 0 0 - 0z
-- rn� cn�wo Nr W> > P' Nj .01111015)
'�
D-0- N�l+
= 3
n
_3� 00
n D rm
3
C) W T� °p m n
z>00
(D 1,
�An
�
c
3v C
z ?rD �
: :.
rD
v N O l0
�. 6 d d*
n=
y
CAD
m°
r
�mi
p w T
7 N
N 6
\ \
O
01
N M
fD (D O
-
N
a
-
0
0
0
Z3 (D ton m y o 7D a C
i zr °0 °o
a v 6
M rho
n 3
D
i, ?
r
n v o n (D M N(
Lni
n rt
0011
rD
p
V„
{r�
Cr
-I
3 zr n n n N n
rl)
3 6 3
O
fD O (O rt
_
6 Q
n O
o Z
TW co
rm 7c TO
n a
m
to o
o OL coo aj Z °�-
C
N-
O
z
p 0
r 5> 9` Z
a o o�
l Z5
y(D v
o
Oi p
? _ �
to
O
C7 0 v
m rD m (D 3
a_ o
-
" o
(D
D c^
'' "sLY
C
0. N 3 v on n° v n
o^ v
° �'
o -
-
Q
r T
3.�
G
m
3 3 0 7� Q °
on, � o�
3 n
rD
in
NO
Cn
.j /f
S'
(n
(= rt (D ?' = rD O !n_
n
d v
rt
r�o
O FD-
_
fT
(D
O
m
Lo
S (D o 6 O r�r
O
O O 6 fl
-
CD
0
_
li
r
O
m T
ZO
Ln n
0
O v 3 O
� 3 -, o
0
0-0
(o
CO
G
3 z
20
r
O n O C
d
N 6
<
O C 0
YS47�
6 fD Inn rt 7 (fin
O O 0, (D (n
(D 3°
to
= !n
1
a O'
rD
0
Z T
< co
_
% xK
O 1p p� lQ 6 r-r iL _
01 n G ° (D '-'
`T < 'O
,rt
S 7 N
O 01 r= n
0<
6 Q
(D -
Q
COj N
rD Q
t0
fl1
T
T..Z7
D
rt t\0 d 0 .�
~' 'D
lD
j
C ID n
X
N n
O
0_
_. fl) O .O
rD
�.? W'
�
X r�r lD O
lD N
Zr 01
rD
m m
r
R
rt rt/ 07
/ O
01 (D
r�r
O
p
-a rn=
00
O
Y '
z m
A !
6 u')
Q � =
Qu S o_ r
-0
D
O_
D
err.; G7
U-,
n �. 3 - -n v
Zr lD 3
n (n 3 N
OO :3 � n
ID
3
3
(D rrtD
6 .
D1 S
rt
T
W
= rD a
O. 6
n<
c
4:
O
D
0 0) (n
O* (D ° t°o
vc n n
rD (n
6
n
n
<C�
z
rm-
�z T T
to �O �D
zz
7<
OR d
O Zr rD E'
(u,
7
C
rl =
rn z3C
o
O
ox 3
u co ui 03 r
w
T 3
O � W W
0
r- Q -< M Z
Z;n
m
< N rt O D
C 3
O
n rt lD 0_
(n
=' lD
O
7< 3
rt < 01
7
d rD
VI 7
d
CD
0 ��
=
N
Ln
fD rD 3 0
pj
r� 301 X
n
(n to
to
^cy'....
to
CD ("1 Ol
rD (n (n
C
!n ''
zr
01
yA,
cn
- n rt
o LA
to
0
-
lD
n
Z
o rD
W
O
zZ<
0m
;•yT
T
T
0
= �,
n
'o �D a
(D
Q
(D D
0
(n
r3o °
d
n
n W
C
3 rD
0-
Q
n o
(nn m w
o
N>
° v
o O o
0-
o n
01 0rt1 rt rt
lD 7
cr
-<
0
rt
A W N N W
3 n In to
I�
N f+ D
rt
O I'D (i
n
0 C (3D
0
=.
01
6
-
D D S z ("�
-O n 3
v �' -
m
O N O n
< m
O
Orr �
6 (n (n
(D rD
6
3
Z
O O 0
a n C 7
.v,..
3
m
m
D o to to
m o (n
,(n-r fD
0
0,
° a O
F'
c
flu
3° 3
m
z
(DD
r-�- rt 3 0.
p ?
a
o
(D
0
D D
0
Lo
v
o a- CL n n
=.v,
v
�i+ m- O O
o o
(D
o m- m -�
O to
0
07
rD °
rD - D �o
o
°
°n D
v o 0
0
0
r
°
m o
CL an N 3' O
_^
N. K
(D
O D
Z3 Ort
O
3 m o Q0 a
"O o
o
-
O O
a
(D
o
cu
6 N 3 6
3
(D
(D 7
N
N Z
6
(D o-
O
7
0 (D o
O
o °
n D-
(D �
vl
n _
m O� v
n r<D
S
3 3 3' =
C ro S
rD ,n
cr 0
O
3 N
V)
n
v a
- _
N
(D N 0
(D n Q
X
o 0
rD W
3 0
N
iti O .3r (D
<
�.
CL v >
(D O_ I
Q
D0 n
.fir o
L'. ; o N �
io
O B
7
D m
3
N
(D
O
N
N N
0
N
(D
N
D
Q
<O
-0 <
^ 7
rD
rD 0
0
o
3
(D
NBC rN 3 -- �O 6 Nr W
O 2 g 0 lD 'D r� C 3 o- rt - 9. n 0
(n ° o Q_ (•n (moo c � n 3 n (D z r°D < vZi a
O 0u �, O W 3' d -_ d N In 01 01 -� (D
,n-r In 6 rt t0 rD (-°D rt O (J1 6 (D 3
n �n3rno3 °mom- X,v�C (D
g zr r0 00 (n � (n 3 a (D ° n ID
N to - N O CD rnt 6 7 !n (D O 01 M W
* O 3 0 oD
3 0 0 17 0 N c 3� 3 6 Z o
00 (n n cn 0 3 rt N rD 0 rt v 6 d N
CD c 01 (D Q rD rrt-r 01 3 0
03i d 0 U) zT q ko O_ (�D 00 m 0 d
EF �� W rt N �. 0 0- 3 D rD to O
a
rt
r0-r D_ Q = rt O o - � 3 X �: m-
O Q 3 O 0) D (D 3 'O0 rN-r
01 (D ln_ (j r0-r ' - 7 rD
O 0 0 (D (D 7 0 0 to N n d m 3
°- n = n (n w o' rD rn(n o
39 <�O °m CDQ Qtoo�
0 3 o v-° o s m(D 3 g 3
3 O= O C -� (D N (D a rt CD
n (D (D
° (O n 3 ° O Q ro
O n O Q C rD 0 0 0 0
n ° -+, a �
nnr o_ � O t0 rD o_ rD 3
W (D ?� dn' 3(n
lD _ rD a �, C rD rt
lo x 3 Q r -r to 7 n O� � O x
O d O1 rt - ID
tnn !n - Q O 7 7
3
Lo 0 3 0 O O (� rt a
Ln n'°-'' n 3 -q) Q3 w to
7 �. 3 rt 0 N O-0
rD to p °-'' 'O r� S r<D
°- p1 N C O 0 rt Z O 0 3 0
n rCr r0-r, '=O, d �, O O -1 C f0 X
O rD a rt 3
O 6� 7 rt ° < Q 01
Ln 3 o a o �_ Q (D a (o
0. O 01 - 3 N N O'<
_ ° ,_. o ff? w o� Q to w
Q d N
a (DD Sn C o 3 3 O n -
O O N 7t
� O O fD rte-, 3 O =1 (D cr
3 rD o
LBEMARLE RESTORATIONS, LLC
WETLAND RESTORATION,
STREAM RESTORATION, &
WILDLIFE HABITAT CREATION
P.O. BOX 176 FAIRFIELD, NC 27826
(252) 333 -0249 FAX [phone]
rn 0 0 - 0z
o
*A
_m
_3� 00
n D rm
o
D
_C)
3
a m
r
z ?rD �
v
rD
n
O r m
0 cn z
rD
t0
Cr
r
�mi
p w T
7 N
rrti
\ \
\ \
..
N M
fD (D O
-
N
'
-
0
0
0
n
V) Ln 0 0 7
Drn0
rn�-r D
3
Z
U) m
rD rD to (n 0,
<
�.
rr
J
7 m 7 rrZ
rD
•f T
7
Cr
D 0
3
n v
°
Y
w
TW co
rm 7c TO
n a
,°
0
3 i
O
O
z
n
O
/ D
7
O rD O 2 v 0 7
,� 0 7
1'I
O
Oi p
? _ �
to
O
C7 0 v
m rD m (D 3
a_ o
-
" o
(D
'D o
07 3 ?
(D O1 O
C
(D
10 W V N N O
o
O n
- zr
to
0, o O
_
-
Q
n
O
CT cr
3 D
n
c,
to
rD n
rD
0
3 °
D 3 0
rD
-D 3
0
3�14 G
0 4 :E
o
_
Dn
0
(D
O
m
3
n
0
- O
Q
=
O S
Q (D
rD
li
r
O
m T
ZO
Ln n
0
7
0
3
\
°-'q c
3 z
20
=1 o n
rD
n rD o
7
A
rD 7
o v'_
3 3
vD 0
w c
a
n N
T r0
c a
CL a
n (^
0 0.
n -
o
3 �
LBEMARLE RESTORATIONS, LLC
WETLAND RESTORATION,
STREAM RESTORATION, &
WILDLIFE HABITAT CREATION
P.O. BOX 176 FAIRFIELD, NC 27826
(252) 333 -0249 FAX [phone]
rn 0 0 - 0z
*A
O
�
�
z
n D rm
o
D
_C)
-i3
D�
\
\\ \\
-n
v
rn
\ \ \ \ \ \ \
\ \ \
\\
O r m
0 cn z
p
xx
�\
\ \ \
p w T
HUDSON PROPERTY
rrti
\ \
\ \
D
Z
W
zz w
\
\
n
O
Drn0
\ "\ \ \
\\ �*' \ �\ \ \
U) m
G)
r
r
\ \
\ \ \
J
(n C) O
0 Z
z
G)
T
r
�3,ry
N-
rO zTrn
r
OWZ
7c7
r D 8(/)
z
z
T
D
�Z(n
TW co
rm 7c TO
D
Ln m D
cn r
3 Ln
A
D
ZZOM
To T -<3
Dtn ��D
f-..(
r
t..
/ D
O
�rn zp-j{
p
O
D
Z
+
3�Crn
DDC
OZ� 3-�z
d
r
D
z
.j m 7c
w m
.....
zm�
303
O Z
T�
C) 0
C�1Z
r = v
o rn
z * C7
m
O
�7 A D
3�14 G
=
�zC
-D{�G)z
z
7c3
m T
ZO
\
\ \ \ \ \
\ \ \
3 z
20
A
z
T r0
Z
\\ \ \\ \ \ \ \
> z
rn A O
r
z0
-
DO
m
�
cn
r
O
m m
T
_
p
-a rn=
00
O
D M rn
m 8 E
z m
A !
m
Irw
D
O
3
0� '
0 I '� i
8
T
W
rnD -12" T—
r
m
-
T Ln
M
m
CC) z��
<C�
z
rm-
�z T T
to �O �D
zz
00 r
z�
o m W Z Z
3z
C
rl =
rn z3C
o
u co ui 03 r
w
T 3
O � W W
0
r- Q -< M Z
m
m00 0mn
G Z G =
D
z
0 ��
=
D
0Zm -0OZo
�z�
O
0
T
I
W
O
zZ<
0m
C
D
m
Z
I
_
Ln
LBEMARLE RESTORATIONS, LLC
WETLAND RESTORATION,
STREAM RESTORATION, &
WILDLIFE HABITAT CREATION
P.O. BOX 176 FAIRFIELD, NC 27826
(252) 333 -0249 FAX [phone]
rn 0 0 - 0z
*A
0_
n D rm
cn
-i3
D�
rcnzzrn�rn
v
c=iz
O-0
xx
r
D
-Z--j
OZW
HUDSON PROPERTY
rrti
(rnn�
m
(n 0 0 p
m
D
Z
T
--10 O
�m�
W
zz w
(f)
rn r
C
Drn0
T7� TT
O W
m
r
r
'obr~
C-I DT�
(n C) O
0 Z
z
G)
T
r
�3,ry
N-
rO zTrn
r
OWZ
m=
r D 8(/)
z
z
T
D
�Z(n
TW co
rm 7c TO
D
Ln m D
cn r
3 Ln
A
D
ZZOM
To T -<3
Dtn ��D
f-..(
r
D O
W T m
z m
O
�rn zp-j{
p
O
3 3
C
Z
+
3�Crn
DDC
OZ� 3-�z
d
N D
D W z z
z�G�
.j m 7c
w m
zm�
303
r
0
C) 0
C�1Z
z * C7
m
3 W 3
3�14 G
=
�zC
-D{�G)z
z
7c3
m T
ZO
(n
r m
Q
T
A
Z
o -0 O
Z
rn A O
r
m z
-
DO
m m
T
_
-a rn=
00
D M rn
m 8 E
z m
A !
-
00WC
pzrnr
0� '
0 I '� i
8
'V -n
3 W DV
rnD -12" T—
r
v0
0
T Ln
A
CC) z��
rm-
zz
O Z
C
T 3
z 0
C)
LBEMARLE RESTORATIONS, LLC
WETLAND RESTORATION,
STREAM RESTORATION, &
WILDLIFE HABITAT CREATION
P.O. BOX 176 FAIRFIELD, NC 27826
(252) 333 -0249 FAX [phone]
o
HUDSON PROPERTY
x
IT
m
A
DETAILS & SECTIONS
m=
BEAUFORT CO., NC
N
°z
N
� tep
Fco m
EEP PROJECT ID: 95361
d
.I
EEP CONTRACT #:004638
A
bJ
LBEMARLE RESTORATIONS, LLC
WETLAND RESTORATION,
STREAM RESTORATION, &
WILDLIFE HABITAT CREATION
P.O. BOX 176 FAIRFIELD, NC 27826
(252) 333 -0249 FAX [phone]

60
Z
W �
o. D
g r
CL
S �
10
w V)
-m
NX rn
n
r
zrO
IF- Z
0
O
r-
a�
s
II �
N 1 A
Wn
CL D
fD r
a
�n
°0
c x U) D
a n rn n
a
�0
N Z
W �
x
x
73 i- rn
a m
m
m■,.
D
N
O_
V
C)
m
�-
y
N 'D
-p
�
n
r
0
0
m
D
°
n D
a
r
W
D
0
c n n
r
BEAUFORT CO., NC
d
co
a r
�n
m
(1
N
-n
0
=_
o�o
0
d N Vi
V)
'
n
W
T 3 Uq
a �
;a
80
}
o 3
m
rn
U) D
a rn
X
ol
nn
(D
a s
ID
a rn C�
n
3 V1
(D
S OZ
rn
o�
0
+ II 1y-I
? O w
0
J
r)
+
X U)
r
O
+
N
x z
00
A
XM Ln
arD
m
m
0
�
o
i
w
N
S
0
co w Z
a
� 1
U)
0
0
w
m
TI
m
r
Z
rn
n
X
N
O_
r
O
w
o
Iz
-
0
^'
rD
W �
o. D
g r
CL
S �
10
w V)
-m
NX rn
n
r
zrO
IF- Z
0
O
r-
a�
s
II �
N 1 A
Wn
CL D
fD r
a
�n
°0
c x U) D
a n rn n
a
�0
N Z
W �
x
x
73 i- rn
a m
m
m■,.
D
to
W �
o. D
g r
CL
S �
10
w V)
-m
NX rn
n
r
zrO
IF- Z
0
O
r-
a�
s
II �
N 1 A
Wn
CL D
fD r
a
�n
°0
c x U) D
a n rn n
a
�0
N Z
W �
x
x
73 i- rn
a m
m
m■,.
R
W Is,,� D
m C)
<_
O
a c/1
+ 3 U)
X rn
a,
I Oz
3
X O
n F
!D
a
S
I
V
Z
0
O
r
M
D
V
C)
m
�-
y
-p
�
HUDSON PROPERTY
r
rn
0
0
m
C)
°
n D
a
r
W
D
0
a
r
BEAUFORT CO., NC
d
co
a r
�n
m
(1
N
-n
EEP PROJECT ID: 95361
=_
o�o
m
'
n
*
v, 0
;a
D
II
r
�
nn
(D
a s
oo 0
�
n
3 V1
D
rn
o�
E5,
3
J
r)
+
X U)
_
L
SL
+
a L
m
o
XM Ln
arD
m
m
0
�
o
ca.
m
w
N
S
, ^
V1
co w Z
� 1
U)
0
O T
m T
w
m
? 0
Z
Z
cxii
0
^'
rD
O
rn
°, r
r
m
n
fD
r
fD
3
d
p
X
Z
S
r'
O
41
R
W Is,,� D
m C)
<_
O
a c/1
+ 3 U)
X rn
a,
I Oz
3
X O
n F
!D
a
S
I
V
Z
0
O
r
M
D
�
C)
m
�-
y
-p
�
HUDSON PROPERTY
r
rn
0
m
DETAILS & SECTIONS
r
0
BEAUFORT CO., NC
d
m
N
11 1{-
�
1,7Le
EEP PROJECT ID: 95361
n
a�
EEP CONTRACT #:004638
D
II
r
�
nn
(D
�
ti,
m
N
n
� O
S
rD
O
V
LBEMARLE RESTORATIONS, LLC
WETLAND RESTORATION,
STREAM RESTORATION, &
WILDLIFE HABITAT CREATION
P.O. BOX 176 FAIRFIELD, NC 27826
(252) 333 -0249 - FAX [phone]
D
C)
m
-p
�
r
0
r
0
a
m
n
a�
D
II
r
�
nn
(D
�
rn
o�
J
r)
a �o
L
SL
XM Ln
arD
D
0
�
_
z
L 0
N
, ^
V1
co w Z
� 1
U)
O T
m T
m
N
n
� O
S
rD
O
V
LBEMARLE RESTORATIONS, LLC
WETLAND RESTORATION,
STREAM RESTORATION, &
WILDLIFE HABITAT CREATION
P.O. BOX 176 FAIRFIELD, NC 27826
(252) 333 -0249 - FAX [phone]

r-
0
c�
a
rt
r
O
Lo
0
0
ru-r
C
rnt
C
0
N
z
�n
II
N
O
r-
0
Q
J
G^
x
U 1
v
II
V
F�
a
-0 nr7
rn
m
i
°W'
zT 70
o O
Z3
h
C1
m
N
y
T c:
rn -
0) (/)
x
m
n
rn
rt r*
0
73 +
(D
�--i
3 0
0
o
W
�a
cn
o
rn
rt
o
(n
m
0) „
�
O
m
0
0 7
;:p
N
v7
rt
00
�
n
C�
r*
c
D
.j
N
D
x
Cn
I
T
`D
�
r
m
N
m
(!
n II
O
w
- 00
V)
Q)
L)
M
X
W
tZ
fD
D
-0
z
F
O
II
z
NT
00
r
rn
O
(DD 11-
70
CO
G
G7
a
(D
O
to
0
O
Ln
C
C
z
in
z
0
G')
Q
N
0
0
0
r-.
c
C
Ln
I'I
0
CV
U I
Q
Z3
rt
r-
0
0
n rt
g D
r n
rnt
3 n c:
II 70 (D
s°1 V)
x
CL
M
J �
II
00
O
r
0
fl1
Q
[D
rt
0
0
0
C
n
D (D
art
t�
co O
3 (!)
x (n
c m
ID
>��
' 0
O
r
N
Q
J
x
0c)�
N D
N
II
V
F�
a r
m
-0 nr7
rn
m
i
°W'
zT 70
o O
h
C1
m
N
y
T c:
rn -
0) (/)
x
m
n
rn
rt r*
0
73 +
(D
�--i
3 0
T
o
W
�a
N
w
o
rn
rt
x
(n
m
0) „
+
O
m
u m
0 7
;:p
N
h
(DD 11-
70
CO
G
G7
a
(D
O
to
0
O
Ln
C
C
z
in
z
0
G')
Q
N
0
0
0
r-.
c
C
Ln
I'I
0
CV
U I
Q
Z3
rt
r-
0
0
n rt
g D
r n
rnt
3 n c:
II 70 (D
s°1 V)
x
CL
M
J �
II
00
O
r
0
fl1
Q
[D
rt
0
0
0
C
n
D (D
art
t�
co O
3 (!)
x (n
c m
ID
>��
' 0
O
r
N
Q
J
x
N
II
V
F�
HUDSON PROPERTY
Q
rn
m
i
�
m
N
y
�j ��
z -�� (� �>,m
7
DETAILS &SECTIONS
BEAUFORT CO., NC
EEP PROJECT ID: 95361
EEP CONTRACT #:004638
n
T
o
W
�a
rn
AROCRAM
w
(n
O
Q
J
N
II
V
F�
Q
D
�
r
n
T
o
W
�a
rn
a
w
(n
m
fD
rt
+
O
m
n
0 7
;:p
(D
00
m
D
.j
N
x
Cn
I
T
D
H
m
N
m
(!
w
w
W
D
z
V)
HJ�
1
0
0
z
w
,z
`°
n
�D
o�
�
D
n
X
m
(�
rn
cD'-
n
rn
<
0
O
v_
O
o
x
z
0
w
rD
r
II
cn
�r
N
n
m
a�
o
I
ALBEMARLE RESTORATIONS, LLC
WETLAND RESTORATION,
STREAM RESTORATION, &
WILDLIFE HABITAT CREATION
P.O. BOX 176 FAIRFIELD, NC 27826
(252) 333 -0249 FAX [phone]

0
N
O
A
0
(D
m
(n
C
3
n
D �p
m C
�)
N /�+
o 0
(f)
07
z
G)
x y
m
I
�- HUDSON PROPERTY
A DETAILS & SECTIONS
N BEAUFORT CO., NC
o tem EEP PROJECT ID: 95361
�.
EEP CONTRACT #:004638
p
2 Lr)
O D
70 z
n
O
rn
n
D D O
r Z
D D
r m
rn rn
i�0
CD = Z
X n
�z
CD m
m
NOUVAIll
N N W W W W
O V 00 O N -4 01
r
!
!
�
0
d
I
m
r
m
70
X_
d
D
O
N
rn
O
!
0
c�i1
z
m
Gzl
O
z
Gi
Dr
p
m
C
-�
m
70
r
rn�
D
X
D
rn
Gi
��
3
v1
n
rn
<�
D O
��
m 0
m
m
3
0m
�m
z
Z p
Z p
0
T
z
-
m
0
rn
p
m
07
G)
0
U)
O
O
C
;a
DC
C
Z
Z
0
p
3
Z
70
70
G)
n
m
�- HUDSON PROPERTY
A DETAILS & SECTIONS
N BEAUFORT CO., NC
o tem EEP PROJECT ID: 95361
�.
EEP CONTRACT #:004638
p
2 Lr)
O D
70 z
n
O
rn
n
D D O
r Z
D D
r m
rn rn
i�0
CD = Z
X n
�z
CD m
m
NOUVAIll
N N W W W W
O V 00 O N -4 01
p 2
m p
W m
� m
� v
m m
70
O
TI
m
r
m
G)
m
Z
VSI
G
3
0
Ln
Ln
D'
Lo
LBEMARLE RESTORATIONS, LLC
WETLAND RESTORATION,
STREAM RESTORATION, &
WILDLIFE HABITAT CREATION
P.O. BOX 176 FAIRFIELD, NC 27826
(252) 333 -0249 FAX [phone]
r
0
d
I
m
r
m
70
X_
3
D
O
N
rn
O
c�i1
z
m
Gzl
O
z
Gi
p
m
C
-�
m
70
U)
D
z
n
m
p 2
m p
W m
� m
� v
m m
70
O
TI
m
r
m
G)
m
Z
VSI
G
3
0
Ln
Ln
D'
Lo
LBEMARLE RESTORATIONS, LLC
WETLAND RESTORATION,
STREAM RESTORATION, &
WILDLIFE HABITAT CREATION
P.O. BOX 176 FAIRFIELD, NC 27826
(252) 333 -0249 FAX [phone]

1� Adlb�
Now
NOLLVA3Ml
0, co C) r1i � m 00
o +- I - _71-1--1
(.n
1�j
c:)
C)
CD
>
Ln
C)
. ....... . .
D0
>
0 > m
<
M N M
II 70 0 m
>
r- m z
o 00
> > z
r- r- Z
Ln m
(n Ln C)
n () Ln
> Z > > M
m -0
ul) m
C) m !-�
r
0 0 W cn >
C) =z n
X n rav,
m > 41 z
NJ
m
-n
c
m 00 ;a c::
r) UJ
70 C) <
0 Ul m m
P--4
4
G) 1 1 j aq ME-Ow a
C)
C) Ln
tj
�. e
m
0
n
> F--f
m
r
rn 70 -a ul) -0 -0 m
m -0 r) -0 m -0 m -0 — ;o --i >
TO 0 m M
m 70 x 0 0 m m
m > x x x -n
0 0 w 0 0 m r- -V C0 m -0 ;� z
< -0 2! m 0 0 0 L m
> 0 mll mo ul) V)
m 0 U-) Y. m m mn m, o z
m 70 Z (f) --i -n
0m M 0 z C)
Z -n M r-
�n 0
(10 M U) co ou 0 G)
a --1 0 0 0 0 m (z
0 70 ul) C 0 > 0 m 70 U)
m --4 Z m 70
(Z ou
> 0 >
z 0 G)
> > n m
m
11 z
HUDSON PROPERTY
z P f m ALBEMARLE RESTORATIONS, LLC
DETAILS & SECTIONS BEAUFORT CO., NC EEP PROJECT ID: 95361 EEP CONTRACT #:004638
1%0 WETLAND RESTORATION,
STREAM RESTORATION, &
WILDLIFE HABITAT CREATION
P.O. BOX 176 • FAIRFIELD, NC 27826
. [phone]• FAX [phone]
o

0
N
O
m
n
0
n
D z
r
rn �
n m
oD
3
C)
70
0
C�
♦ Po>
f
I-
II
I
I
m
o �
ry m
m
C)
0
U1
o
A
r
i
A
l
°
N
�
,II
ALBEMARLE RESTORATIONS, LLC
item
WETLAND RESTORATION,
STREAM RESTORATION, &
WILDLIFE HABITAT CREATION
II
I
I
m
o �
ry m
m
C)
0
U1
* *0 �
6hh.-,\
0
O D
< � n
rn
O �!
n D O
D r G�
DD�rn]
r r -I
rn m
0
C-) =z
X
z
o-n
- m
m
NOI- LVA313
0 O� N
OD O -pl
o
A
r
A
l
°
N
6
HUDSON PROPERTY
DETAILS & SECTIONS
BEAUFORT CO., NC
EEP PROJECT ID: 95361
EEP CONTRACT #:004638
ALBEMARLE RESTORATIONS, LLC
item
WETLAND RESTORATION,
STREAM RESTORATION, &
WILDLIFE HABITAT CREATION
P.O. BOX 176 • FAIRFIELD. NC 27826
(252) 333 -0249 FAX [phone]
o
d
I�
I
rn�
7 v
v
I
r
r70
D
Fr"
D
�
0
X_
�
0
<
D O
m 0
m
3
rn
H
0
O
c�i1
3
�
o
mz
0 0
Z 0
Z D
-m
z
0
m�
0
m
co
0
G)
v
�
O
c
O
c
T
70
<
c
z
z
0
0
3
D
D
>
>
z
n
z
m
n
m
* *0 �
6hh.-,\
0
O D
< � n
rn
O �!
n D O
D r G�
DD�rn]
r r -I
rn m
0
C-) =z
X
z
o-n
- m
m
NOI- LVA313
0 O� N
OD O -pl
v
70
0
m
r
m
G)
m
z
0
Cn
C17
g
ti
0
o
A
A
l
°
N
6
HUDSON PROPERTY
DETAILS & SECTIONS
BEAUFORT CO., NC
EEP PROJECT ID: 95361
EEP CONTRACT #:004638
ALBEMARLE RESTORATIONS, LLC
item
WETLAND RESTORATION,
STREAM RESTORATION, &
WILDLIFE HABITAT CREATION
P.O. BOX 176 • FAIRFIELD. NC 27826
(252) 333 -0249 FAX [phone]
o
I�
7 v
v
rn
r
rn
D
To
o
3
0
rm
O
c�i1
3
�
o
mz
0 0
z
r
0
0
m
0
c
0
�
<
03
D
z
n
m
v
70
0
m
r
m
G)
m
z
0
Cn
C17
g
ti
0
o
A
A
l
°
N
HUDSON PROPERTY
DETAILS & SECTIONS
BEAUFORT CO., NC
EEP PROJECT ID: 95361
EEP CONTRACT #:004638
ALBEMARLE RESTORATIONS, LLC
item
WETLAND RESTORATION,
STREAM RESTORATION, &
WILDLIFE HABITAT CREATION
P.O. BOX 176 • FAIRFIELD. NC 27826
(252) 333 -0249 FAX [phone]

Cl
D
r
m
z
T
m
0
�o
0
CD
cn
n
r
M I--I
G)
I I
N
o
0
z
�
d
In
I
-s
I
O
D
� I
"
cA
o
HUDSON PROPERTY
�0
lTJ
z° z0
m0
V)
'�O
z m
>
M
Ad
PLANTING PLAN
m
0
0
0
z
m�
r
o W
Iv
'a
ffnn70
D D
mocn
D 3
S
3
-�{
<
0
m
c
n
j'
�
..em
CL
0
3
rn
c
C
z
.<
_
O_
N
fD
N
N
Q
p
O
p
�•
V1
O
rD
3 (D
3
-,
\ m
F-
fD vi
O
to Ln
Ln
to
0
3 Q
rn
D
CL
z
z
z
Q
L,
O
O
O
�
d
I
I
I
c>,
I
� I
"
HUDSON PROPERTY
�0
lTJ
z° z0
m0
V)
'�O
z m
>
M
Ad
PLANTING PLAN
m
0
0
0
z
m�
r,
o W
BEAUFORT CO., NC
ffnn70
D D
mocn
D 3
S
3
-�{
D
0
o
m
j'
�
..em
EEP PROJECT ID: 95361
A
{
rn
c
C
z
1
EEP CONTRACT #:004638
I
I
I
I
c>,
I
� I
"
�0
z-V
z° z0
m0
V)
'�O
z m
>
;:!O
z m
>
;�O
z rn
G)
ao m
O
Z 0
0
0
0
z
m�
r,
o W
ffnn
> m
ffnn70
D D
mocn
D 3
S
3
-�{
D
0
o
m
z
C
A
{
rn
c
C
z
z
Z
r
m
Gl
m
z
v
LBEMARLE RESTORATIONS, LLC
WETLAND RESTORATION,
STREAM RESTORATION, &
WILDLIFE HABITAT CREATION
P.O. BOX 176 FAIRFIELD, NC 27826
(252) 333 -0249 FAX [phone]

ro n =
K pq pi
c y, -
s a
ro
m
N d
vi
c
c
ro
E" z _
= n z
z n
n p m
n
ro
c` n
= c 3 3
c 3
e
fD
n d L/I
p a
v rD
— m
v z
m z n
_ n m
n
Z o p
n
n ro
1
N 4 0 m
x' M z
rn
C rD ;o R
� b
fD
;
co
'D
V5
0 �a
n � _
m
N
d n d
Z p
n <
8 � a
Kdz
° = n
ID
n c
3 o rn
s ?
m
� d
3 n rho
3 m
n 3
o- go
� c
3 c
3
C
o 'y;
cr
d
O c
ti
n n
p 0
� d
d d
d
z z
n n
m m
O
Am
D
z
m
m
m
3
X
N
Lri
l 1
m
x
-
HUDSON PROPERTY
rn
0
N
J
Vi
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
�-,
BEAUFORT CO., NC
O
3
�i j'osystem
i ,7 / 7L
C
-n
EEP CONTRACT #:004638
P
O
O
O
CD
CD
O
O
0
O
Z
x
I-D
O
N
rD
O
O
�
r
'O
n
rD
ft
_
fD
N
'Tl
'
r
ft
O
�
x
x
O
O
n
CD
>S'•
�
CD
CD
n
CD
CD
n
>y
Aj
CD
CD
UQ
rD
SID
O
O
n
Q..
Q..
S✓
vO
7,����
>y
CD
ao
>v
�
�
�
>✓
o
o-
�
>v
o
0
0
0
�
0
0
,
0o
CJG
SID
(IQ
p
Cro
11)
UQ
N
CD
�
O
.:+
o
O
O
O
O
O
O
n
►5
O
�
N
rD
_
o
00
IZ
74
(7G
UQ
CIQ
A'_
(fG
(IQ
W
^D
O
ry
�
t�j
O
O
O
�-
�
rp
�•
Crc
�
O
O
N
n
n
4
4�
sZ
>y
�
0
�
C
r�
t�
t-j
ft
00
00
oc
oc
00
00
00
oc
00
o
�
O
arc
00
00
o0
00
00
00
00
oc
00
00
00
00
00
O
�c
ro n =
K pq pi
c y, -
s a
ro
m
N d
vi
c
c
ro
E" z _
= n z
z n
n p m
n
ro
c` n
= c 3 3
c 3
e
fD
n d L/I
p a
v rD
— m
v z
m z n
_ n m
n
Z o p
n
n ro
1
N 4 0 m
x' M z
rn
C rD ;o R
� b
fD
;
co
'D
V5
0 �a
n � _
m
N
d n d
Z p
n <
8 � a
Kdz
° = n
ID
n c
3 o rn
s ?
m
� d
3 n rho
3 m
n 3
o- go
� c
3 c
3
C
o 'y;
cr
d
O c
ti
n n
p 0
� d
d d
d
z z
n n
m m
O
Am
D
z
m
m
m
3
X
N
Lri
l 1
m
LBEMARLE RESTORATIONS, LLC
WETLAND RESTORATION,
STREAM WILDLIFE HAB HABITAT R CREATION II
P.O. BOX 176 FAIRFIELD. NC 27826
(252) 333 -0249 FAX [phone]
x
-
HUDSON PROPERTY
rn
0
N
J
Vi
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
�-,
BEAUFORT CO., NC
O
3
�i j'osystem
i ,7 / 7L
EEP PROJECT ID: 95361
-n
EEP CONTRACT #:004638
P
O
O
O
CD
CD
O
O
0
O
Z
x
O
O
'O
O
N
'Tl
'
r
r
O
O
>S'•
CD
CD
n
CD
CD
n
n
Aj
n
UQ
rD
7,����
0
0
,
0o
CJG
SID
(IQ
p
Cro
11)
UQ
N
CD
�
O
.:+
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
n
►5
O
N
rD
IZ
n
CD
N
ry
tv
t�j
4
4�
0
00
00
oc
oc
00
00
00
oc
00
00
00
O
arc
LBEMARLE RESTORATIONS, LLC
WETLAND RESTORATION,
STREAM WILDLIFE HAB HABITAT R CREATION II
P.O. BOX 176 FAIRFIELD. NC 27826
(252) 333 -0249 FAX [phone]
x
-
HUDSON PROPERTY
rn
A
PLANTING DETAIL
rn
�-,
BEAUFORT CO., NC
3
�i j'osystem
i ,7 / 7L
EEP PROJECT ID: 95361
-n
EEP CONTRACT #:004638
P
LBEMARLE RESTORATIONS, LLC
WETLAND RESTORATION,
STREAM WILDLIFE HAB HABITAT R CREATION II
P.O. BOX 176 FAIRFIELD. NC 27826
(252) 333 -0249 FAX [phone]

x
Cn
rn
W
x � mw N 3 — 3
1_ 1­ �_ kD m V rt m 0,
�
to -0 .A W N u F-' M
J N (1)
F1 (n
Z � C W N � hl � Fy (n
O
I O_ fV �
(D
n,
�
N
� C) .
~"Cx(D
n
-n
v�
(D . (D
n��0 ��
DDD°)
n
Dp
n N �
rn'-a (D -n (D p �p
�D
7 PTI
�' 3 —Ip O (D �z
(D
v
rt
v Z
D
C
< d p
as
r P
r)
3. O d a,
E Z
= _
_ —
=
7o
D
mD fl! < 3
7 Z
O- ((D° O (n CD m
p)
N -- (D
r0r T
v lfl p
(D Q
r_Or
:3 z; N
rt Z
d (D
d
0
to
_r m Lo vii p (D
D
to
N Ci
(� D
°
0
z
°
_^ v< 0-
r)
`n
0
0 m,
m
0 ° rt c o
(D 00 rt rD o O r
(3D (nD
0
rt
cn
fD
(p G�
r-t
�.
(D O0 0 Ort v
°
r0-r
p rt
rn
(np
n3i Z
-O T.
_
cOn
-0
N
[�D
(n
7o
cn '�
(n N
7
D
Z
rrtr
p 7
a) (n Q
�. C n, r r n rt
p 7
ai
O n
Vf
(D Ill
3
n
r* (D o-
7'
0 C
n)
(a
74 LQ
v O
Q O
(D
O (O
(D
0) " O (D D
rt
(D rt rnt
rt
zr 0
Q)
D, D
nrt ,
Q) f—D
p _t O O O<
r0r N
(D
p ° ((D
— n
G' 3
0
<' (D
Lo
�
O
(`DD ) 1 � (p rt (n
fD
.
O - _s
r-r
a O
�.
O
lD
Z
O
Ort
lD
(D
O
F• lnD O 3 On
v
.
ai
�
to
n—)
7 (n
o (D
r0r n �.
O rt
(D O—
N
o< fl,
C
Gi
* p n n, O" x.
a p
p r* Q v
(D
O 0)
O_ (D
7
G
N 3 -'
Ort
(D (D
=
ci
o (D =
0—
C
!D (D m rt
(D m
n
-0 0 —
m
rt—
Ort
rt cn
Ort
p
m
3 O nl ZT Lo O=
(^
v -p
0- Zr-
O_ r* (O
(n
(D
c:
r0r c O
O 6 Lo
O�
U,
O� c0 Q
�
0)
Ln
(D
v
rt 0r to 3 n p
O
O m 0
(D O
G d p
O
(D d
(D O
n)
�
r i
!D
C rr -t 4
rt v
O.
< Ln
3
�
_
n
7
rt
ZT 'p N (D O
O
rt (n (n
r=t '=r
O. ((DD Cm),
Z
6
(D
l0 � p O_ O' c0
0) r�.r
C
D (D �
Q
6
m 'O
to
O"
O
CL
� -n (D t0 Q,
(D 7
rn —
m (D
m lD
7 to C
rt lD
N D
O
O°
3
m
�<
v O
Q lfl
O a
O
O
c N N
�
° Ort
c' Ooh
(rtD
3 O_ (D
0
r0r
+1•
?
v C• (D
(D
p
lD O
n
n rt
=
(ND
p rt N (?. (r
O
p
(n s
(�i 6
v r* CD
rt
Om S v
G
d
rt <
X
(mD
D "O p fD
n
rt
rt rt
r�r 7 to
(D (D
rt
(D r*
fl!
Q) (D
(D (p r
(OD
O
(rtp
O
, lD (D
rn p
W �'
p
rt
(D Z3 (D -0
(D
�-Y
0)
�-rt n
(D
z
— Q r* O (D
lD
x
° (D
p,
rt
Q
n
Q)
n
(D
(°—D
0) _
Qj rt
O
Q
°Y
CD (D
n
(D
v
7 -p (D j
n
�
(D (D
o o
O
O-
O Lo
(D
n, (D rt
c
°
a
�'
(D
v'
o
(D
�.
— Z3 10
— r o
O
rt
�, rt
� D to
0,
°
�'
n'
O.
N
zr
0,
c
�G
fl, o
v
O r*
v a
(D
v
((D
< 0) O D
-O
Ln
(D Lo
a
�.
rr
C n 40i 7 O
Ort m N
(D
m °
VOi
�
0)
((D
n z
_r
((D
l0 (n "O O
-0 M.
v
C
O
70 �
lD
(D
07
O
0)
7
vrt
7
0 rt
r0r
O
rt
D O
CD
O n rn
0--o
O <
n
°
O
n
+
rNr t0 (D
rt
(D 0
Q) Ort
O_
3 (D X
cn
cn
zT O
7 rt 0,
to
(n
7 to C'
to
lD
O
7
O
n
r*
(D
rt 0) n,
(n <
rt
<
(D
n
(D rt rt
(D rr
C
(D
m
_
0.
0)
r0-r
vrti
r0-r x '"r
zT-
C
N
Lo
'<
,.*
O (D
O_
N
p
lD 0,
rr
(D
(D
n)
_
m m
7
d m
D 6 p
fD
v
lD
rt ul 3
O-
!D 0- C
(D
(D
=
<
O_ (D
r*
(n
(D N
nt O
-h
Q
n
(n v (D
O O (DD N m
�
O_
7
l0
O -0 (D 1n
(p n j'
n
O_
_ O
0
(D
n
rt
lD c0 (D D'
Elt n
rt
O
(n
CD O r
d
rt —_
n
m
�'
0-
lD
rY
(7
l0
m
7
'�
rt 0
0) rt rt
at: (D
CD
O
rt n
°
3
0
(o
nn, n
a))
°
°7
`� o
v
-0 rt O�
f D
Ln (n
o a aj
rt O_
0, p v
(D
m
to
� 3 -- m
CO
-p
n _0 (D
rt
n (D
< rt
(D 0O (D r-r 0,
(D
D
p
rr Qj
G
O
rt
O
n
—
d
O_
Q
O
0 'o
3
lD
(D
—
(D
O< 0
(D
—
D v O
rut
(D
(D
�' O_ C1
O rt d
Ln
rt
Q)
L 7 EiT
^
�.
O rt
(D
d
[(np
O
v rtD n 7 (D
[�
D O
0) Z3 S
r
O
n)
C
00
zr,
rt
°
V)
- c (D
C
rt
O. 0, fD c:
In
N
(D
(n
(n
fD
0, rnr
4!
0, O
�O (D
7
r r-r
(D
C
O_
=
n)
rt
�.
U, ai
O
D to
O
O
�
Ln
rr
(D
N D
r N 7
O�
(�D N
(D
Q)
f�D
F✓
O
0
3
(6D vii O
r
O (D
�
D 6
7
p N
C O
p
O
0)
CD
rt -0 07 _
ET 0)
(D
N
(D
m l0
O
O
O
(D O = (D
O_
-
(D
N
(D
(cp
Lo
O
O
F�
r
0
O
C
((D O- 0 (DD
(D 3 rt—
O_
p'
v 3 lD
t, �_
d
p
(D
t0
rt_
v r
rt O
cT
rt
rt
ZT (D
v
7
_rt
O
�'
` . lD —
n) rt'
N
lD m
N
rnt n, (n
rr
lD
((DD
3
(D
O_ � 0 �
(D
�
Z (D -n
O
-
v,
3
� r* (— (D ZT CL O
O
O °
lD
Ln
�
O O Q
Q
�
(D
v
�D
� Q n
�
�
-0
(`rtn
(D
r-r
(On
� (D O
0) rt
rt
O
N (D
7
to
n (D
O r* O
Z
'n (D
FD (D
(n '
(D
O
N
_
_
(�_
(D
°O
n Q
�_ (n
Q) ul
a
D
07 0)
fD O—
O
07 O r*
r0r
rt O n, CD
O O_
(n
rt
p d (D
E3
j n
O_
O
(D
(D
D
d
lD
p
5,
lD
Q 0,
(D
(n
O_
(D
<
rt
1-' -h '0
r0r
p
°
O
v<
O
O Z)
O
p D 0
n ai
O
(D
O 0 v Q
S n
v O (D
O�
(D
(p
(D
rt
(D
l0
Q
(p
rn 0 rt
(D
rt
0
t
(?
;n 7
(�
(D 0
rt
(n
O_
(O
O_
(n l0
D
((D
r-r
FD
n (On
n) D rt
(D 5
n)
r0r
LL
C
v d
O
0
_0 � �
�
C
fr' O
0 �
�
(D
D
O<
v
(n
Q
fD d
6
n
_�
fD
_^
Om
p
(D
zr
X
r (D Q
c0
LnU
rt
(D
7
(D
(D
n
lD
On
rt
-
0
�.
0
O v rt
C
x
�
0
(n
C rt�
r_r.
rt
D
O v
d
7 O. O
n
_
0
r'*
00
<
7- 0)
p
7'
fl1
O
rt
c
rt 0, � rt
n) D
rt
(n
(D
0-
(D
C
(D
(D n)
rt to
7
v
r*
rt.
(n
rrnt
7 (D (D
O O_ rn 0-
(T
<
7 O
O G
7 Z N
t0 (D
rrtr
_
nl
rt
O
v
=
U) OC Q
ai
p
�
(On
r0r
O
_
O
Q
N
n)
v
O
rOt
(n (D
Q
Ort
n)
D
7
rt
�.
_ r
U)
O' (n (,n rr 0j W (D
O IV
D N t0 cn
D - F" �
(D
(D d (D (n
O_
N
�n
0
O
r0r
0
v
(/) (n (D
fD O O
(D to m
nn)
'Op
O
0)
O
lD
77
'T
rt
X. 0- lD (D p W 7 D
3 n_ ((Dj
{n C
O
N
d
Q
O_
p
n
fV
CL (p 3 0 0 6 0rn 5" p
0
D O n
<
(D
Ort
O
p
rn
(D
O
O
rt
(D
n
3
(D
lJ1
rn �' D' (D n _.
O° l0 (D—
r0r
(D n
(D
rt
rt r r
(D O Z
fnD
Z
((n
~
O
O
o
rnt 0 07
(D O p 0 N O �'
O (D lD
tn (n O
6
_<
a)
6
_<
rt
(D
O.'
(D
0nj
rN-r
Ort
d< rt 'o N N
(D
O
t0'
r4 rt (n 70
°
< O -i
Ort
v
O
rr
C
O
a O_ n ((D
O'
O Z
N (D m
D_
n,
D_
Z)
rt
p
O
O
Z)
n)
CD O0 Q) S O
n to
p) E r r
(D - 7'
6
O"
(D
O
(D
r*
Gi
—
3
� O 10
O
7 rt
O (D cn O
O
O LID
lD
lD
n,
(D
S
r-r
3
V)
O 7
rt
t0 7
(D
C-0 ((DD
O_
(D n rn
O CD
n,
m
�G
ni
�G
(D
(n
n
p
�
lD
Q
(D
(D
rn
rt (n O O CD
0
,
)- O 3
= 3
_
o
ul 0
D
(D
0
°
_0
0
in
v v
n° (T
(D 3 m
,O
n
-0
m
It-
(D
n
(D
-
n O_ rt (n rt <
n)
n)
O_ 0)
(D
(n
0)
(D
O
O
O
_�
O1
O
r r 0n1 -0 Ort 0)
(D (D
n O
O
=
O
-r
x
(n
(D
a
O
t
(D
<
nrt) rr-r N rt n)
' (D
Ort 3
(n (D G
m
cu
Q)
m
ni
0)
7
O
c
O
O
to
(D
CD O" _3 —
(D
tD 0,
(n
(D rn
fmD
ZT
O
O
0
r-r
Q)
-0°
Qj
lD rt
rt
0
n
010
O
C
c7n
0)
VOi
t0
(D
(fin
-0
(n
zr
(D rt n tnn
7 0) 2- n Z
Ort
cn On (n
O O
d
_
'o6 �_
O 7
r
r
ni
(n
:
n
(D
rn v, lD O
(D O �
v
Q C
n,
°
n
(D
n
O
-'
G
lD
O_
(D
(D
Q
_0
=
rnr
Q
z 5.
rOt
a f��D -
10
Ort
(D
to
t0 3 f D Ort � n)
Ort O.
O_ v
v
0, (D ZT r-r C
K O_ (D O
7
n) (D
rt
6
'< O O_
p n
rn N
(n 'o c o n (n
(U 3 n io
Cd D
O (D
o m (D
3 ° c o
n �^ (D a
a rJO 3 g �ggi r m Z rn rr) 7
o _ F < f 10
Z3 1 v 0 v
cl
CL L0 0
EF
C ro rNB 7 0 �, Q
(D or O O rn-r
m 8 O n,
rt rD �
->
(D ° O t�
Qj
a o o� A rr
8
=3 a r; /- - t0
sr 0
('D 3 d _ .. "p
a s
f a
0 'a s w 88s
a o 5 Qn
0 3 vF
0
lw
3 rD f o R
Xo
HUDSON PROPERTY
PLANTING DETAIL
BEAUFORT CO., NC
EEP PROJECT ID: 95361
EEP CONTRACT #:004638
Z
z
G�
cn
m
m
C)
TI
n
O
Z
(1)
LBEMARLE RESTORATIONS, LLC
WETLAND RESTORATION,
STREAM E TORATION,
W ON
P.O. BOX 176 FAIRFIELD, NC 27826
(252) 333 -0249 FAX [phone]
z
D�
n<
�rn
�0
m
m
z
•* Q � D
n �
n
o to
Z3 _
Z
z 5
0 7u
rD C
O
C-) � D
m J Z
r
as
r P
r)
D
0
-
F7
0
m
n
x
C)
LBEMARLE RESTORATIONS, LLC
WETLAND RESTORATION,
STREAM E TORATION,
W ON
P.O. BOX 176 FAIRFIELD, NC 27826
(252) 333 -0249 FAX [phone]

a
�
N
�
�
°
�••
HUDSON PROPERTY
BOUNDARY MARKING PLAN
n
BEAUFORT CO., NC
•�
O
EEP PROJECT ID: 95361
z
EEP CONTRACT #:004638
p
b
<
CC
.L
/
Om \ '`
/
W
O D
/
Z m
p 3
rn
70
<
O
�.
O
�
�.
m
m
D
rn
0
3
D
�•
m
O
n
�'
D
z
•�-
D
/
n
D
�.
�..
o
i
70
i
!
m
j
I
co
n
co
z
%
,.
°
z
w
0o
z
00
p
\
z V)
o
� ,.sue
%
p m
\
O
\
D
°o
~ z m
m
m
D
\
-< -
\ H
N
\ O
/.
n
-n
CD
— rt -0 n O 0- n -I n
ZY O O CD ZT o
Q rt D cn CD Cp
°o ZT � p CU j
0
cn rt No cn CD cn
rt
-s = n C
N fD CD CD
Q o _. z 3 zr�
O
CD � fl O�5
O o- a) rD (D a, < ly
0)
n O
rt CD L a � <
G
C
rt p
�
�
Q
z
p- 0 Lnn O O
O rt
coil 0
O rt rt N O (�
W
O
d
Q �y
rt CD CD a) CD rt cn CD
7 aj ai rt !y S t1
O Q O .-. 1 4 cn
C- O7 CD
I
I
C
Z
'
D
r7 cn CD CD cn CD a) of
�
rt O CD - I
I
p
z
3 -o 3
m. 3 Q) r-r ,y �
n
y
O 7 0 `� n
c- CAD rt
�•
{
F--�
rt O CD rt
a �'
0 O Oz
D
h _
°;�
O CAD 6
(n
z CO
Cr
^.
{9
cn
z
� cn -. C -� O�
O =_=
CD = V p ai 3
p �n > A
D
m
A
z
ro
(")
o
O o-
O
a O N o = n 07
rn <
z 0
�D
Lo U)
G ZT�
O 70�
rn
O
rn
jj
6 a)(D ty rat
r�r CD
N �_ ° O o
z
�•
D
O n
1-r
'+ -0 G T
r- 3 �
O
D
_
>Z o
0 �.
Q -s rn >L
m
p
r
rr+
ni
IS
CD
�
CD cn
� 3
� r�r C`�D
O 3 Q
O
z
ai
ALBEMARLE
RESTORATIONS,
LLC
WETLAND RESTORATION,
STREAM
RESTORATION, &
WILDLIFE
HABITAT CREATION
P.O. BOX 176
• FAIRFIELD, NC 27826
(252) 333 -0249 • FAX [phone]
a
�
N
�
�
°
�••
HUDSON PROPERTY
BOUNDARY MARKING PLAN
BEAUFORT CO., NC
EEP PROJECT ID: 95361
EEP CONTRACT #:004638
p
b
<
CC

•
•
•
Appendix E - Reference Reach Photographs
Photo #1: Facing upstream at reference riffle feature
Photo #2: Facing upstream at reference pool feature

0
•
Appendix E - Reference Reach Photographs
Photo #3: Facing upstream at reference riffle feature
• Photo #4: Facing upstream at riffle composed of coarse sand and woody debris

0
•
Appendix E - Reference Reach Photographs
Photo #5: Facing downstream at reference riffle /fun complex
• Photo #6: Facing downstream at reference riffle with embedded woody material

0
•
APPENDIX F
FLOODPLAIN STUDY

0
L�
HUDSON PROPERTY
Flood Study Report
EEP Contract #: 004638
Prepared for:
Ecosystem Enhancement Program
1601 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699
877.623.6748
3 March 2014
Prepared by:
Albemarle Restorations, LLC
P.O. Box 176
Fairfield, NC 27826
804.466.0794
,����tiitirrrr
Off.••. cg /
SEAL��`
040438 =
3/3/14
SI
11011111\0` \\
William K. Mumaw, PE 0 540.239.1428

Hudson — Flood Study Report
. March 3, 2014
Table of Contents
Section1: Introduction ........................ :........................................................................................................ 1
1.1 Executive Summary ........................................................................................ ..............................1
1.2 Purpose of Study ............................................................................................. ..............................1
1.3 Coordination ................................................................................................... ..............................1
Section2: Area Studied .................................................................................................. ............................... 2
2.1 Scope of Study ............................................................................................... ............................... 2
Section 3: Engineering Methods ..................................................................................... ..............................2
3.1 Hydrologic Analyses ...................................................................................... ............................... 2
3.2 Hydraulic Analyses ......................................................................................... ..............................3
Section4: Mapping Methods .......................................................................................... ..............................4
4.1 Vertical & Horizontal Datum .......................................................................... ..............................4
4.2 Base Map ........................................................................................................ ..............................4
4.3 Floodplain and Floodway Delineation ............................................................ ..............................4
• Section 5: Results ............................................................................................................ ..............................5
5.1 Floodplain Boundaries .................................................................................... ..............................5
Section6: Supplemental Study ....................................................................................... ..............................5
6.1 Hydraulic Analysis ..........................................................................................: .............................5.
Section 7: Select References .............................'.............................................................. ..............................6
•
Exhibits
Exhibit 1: Existing Base Flood Map
Exhibit 2: Existing Hydraulic Calculations & Cross Sections
Exhibit 3: Proposed Base Flood Map & Detailed Area
Exhibit 4: Proposed Hydraulic Calculations & Cross Sections
Exhibit 5: Correspondence
Exhibit 6: FEMA Released HEC -2 Calculations (1982)
Exhibit 7: EEP Floodplain Requirements Checklist
Exhibit 8: Supplemental Hydraulic Study

•
Flood Study Report
Hudson Property
EEP Contract #: 004638
Section 1: Introduction
1.1 Executive Summary
Hudson — Flood Study Report
March 3, 2014
This report documents the purpose, methods, and results of a Flood Study completed for the North
Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program ( NCEEP) for a proposed stream restoration project located in
Beaufort, North Carolina. The proposed stream restoration project includes geomorphic modifications
to five stream channels. One of these stream channels (Reach 5) is located within the 1% annual
floodplain (Zone AE) of Horse Branch. The proposed work does not encroach on the floodway. This
study evaluates the effect of the proposed activity on the existing floodplain elevations. The Flood
Study included a review of available data, the re- creation of the currently defined 1% annual floodplain
model, and the creation of a proposed floodplain model.
• The study revealed that there is "no rise" in Base Flood Elevation (BFE) as a result of the proposed
project. The proposed actions that are to occur within the limits of the floodplain cause negligible
changes in the limits of the floodplain boundary but do not cause the flood elevation to increase.
1.2 Purpose of Study
This Flood Study was completed to determine the effect of the proposed restoration activities within the
FEMA defined 1% annual floodplain (Zone AE) on the Base Flood Elevation. This study is being
completed at the request of the NCEEP in conjunction with the North Carolina Floodplain Mapping
Program. Projects that encroach in the Special Flood Hazard Area (SFHA) must comply with floodplain
management regulations as a condition of participation in the NFIP.
1.3 Coordination
This project included coordination with the North Carolina Floodplain Mapping Program, the Ecosystem
Enhancement Program, and personnel and contractors of FEMA. This coordination resulted in the need
for the Study being identified and the acquisition of available hydrologic and hydraulic data that exists
for the project area.
•
1

L]
Hudson — Flood Study Report
March 3, 2014
Section 2: Area Studied
2.1 Scope of Study
This Flood Study covers the geographic area surrounding Horse Branch adjacent to the project site in
Beaufort County, North Carolina. The proposed restoration work will occur on an unnamed tributary
(Reach 5) to Horse Branch that enters Horse Branch on the right bank between study cross section 93
and 92. The study does not include areas of Horse Branch upstream or downstream beyond what was
required for hydraulic modeling purposes. A section of Horse Branch was analyzed as part of this
project as identified in the exhibits to this report. All proposed stream restoration reaches that are not
located in the currently defined 1% annual flood plain are excluded from this study since they will have
no effect on the base flood elevations; however, a supplemental study was performed to assess the
hydraulic performance of the proposed stream channels (Exhibit 8).
Section 3: Engineering Methods
3.1 Hydrologic Analyses
This report relied on data provided by the FEMA Engineering Library and published data found in the
Flood Insurance Study (FIS) Report for Beaufort County, North Carolina and Incorporated Areas, dated
January 2, 2004. The FEMA Engineering Library did not have a hydrologic analysis for the specific section
of Horse Branch that this study is concerned with; however, they were able to provide HEC -2 outputs
that confirmed hydrologic data referenced in the FIS Report. The peak discharge associated with the
FIRM 1% probability annual storm event (referred herein as 100 year peak discharge) for Horse Branch
were developed previously through the use of regional regression equations for urban and rural areas of
the piedmont region of North Carolina. These equations use drainage area size as the input to estimate
peak discharges. The drainage area that was used for the study reach of Horse Branch in the FIS study
was measured at Gray Road, which is approximately 1.27 miles downstream of the project site and the
study reach.
The 100 year peak discharge (1,180 cfs) calculated previously and documented in the FIS was used for
this study. As part of the supplemental study, peak discharges of Horse Branch were also investigated
using a point of analysis just downstream from the project site. This hydrologic study relied on the USGS
Stream Stats model ( http:/ /water.usgs.gov /osw /streamstats /north carolina.html), which provides an
interactive map to derive both drainage areas and peak discharge rates using regression equations.
• More information can be found at the web link provided. A table summarizing the peak discharges for
Horse Branch is shown below.
K

•
Hudson - Flood Study Report
March 3, 2014
Table 1: Horse Branch Study Discharges
Reach
Drainage Area
2 Year (cfs)
10 Year (cfs)
50 Year
100 Year
100 Year
(ifs)
(mil)
0.063
40.51
(cfsJ
(cfsJ
Horse Branch Downstream
3.5
-
450.0
900.0
1180.0
(from FEMA FIS)
68.8
85.2
Reach 3
0.055
35.21
Horse Branch Downstream
1.96
93.3
263.0
463.0
567.0
(from USGS Stream Stats)
26.2
70.6
102.0
125.9
Reach 5
Horse Branch Upstream
1.66
54.1
155.3
306.1
372.4
(from USGS Stream Stats
and TR -55 estimates)
Additional peak discharges were estimated and used as part of the supplemental study. These
discharges were estimated using the TR -55 methodology and are provided in the table below for
informational purposes.
Table 2: Design Discharges (TR -55 Field Verified Watershed)
Reach
Drainage Area
(mi2)
Drainage Area
(00
2 Year (cfs)
10 Year (cfs)
50 Year
(ifs)
100 Year
(ifs)
Reach 1
0.063
40.51
5.6
19.0
29.2
37.4
Reach 2
0.117
74.63
17.2
47.4
68.8
85.2
Reach 3
0.055
35.21
8.0
20.9
30.1
37.0
Reach 4
0.235
150.35
26.2
70.6
102.0
125.9
Reach 5
0.298
190.86
39.2
107.7
156.9
194.6
3.2 Hydraulic Analyses
Analyses of the hydraulic characteristics of Horse Branch flooding were performed to recreate the FIRM
referenced floodplain BFEs as well as to model the effects of the proposed restoration. The U.S. Army
Corps of Engineers' HEC -RAS Version 4.1.0 was used to model Horse Branch during flood conditions.
Cross sections were located at identified Base Flood Elevation contours, documented FIRM cross
sections, and supplementally as necessary. National Flood Hazard Layers (NFHL) were acquired from
FEMA and imported to establish the location of cross - sections and also the floodplain and floodway
boundaries.
Channel roughness was calculated iteratively within the range provided in the FIS associated with Horse
Branch. The FIS references channel roughness coefficients in the range of 0.02 to 0.06 and overbank
roughness coefficients in the range of 0.16 to 0.20. The maximum values were used in order to derive
elevations that conform to those reported in the FIRM. Site photos and aerial photography confirm the
• likelihood of high roughness coefficients.
3

•
•
Hudson — Flood Study Report
March 3, 2014
Section 4: Mapping Methods
4.1 Vertical & Horizontal Datum
The study was performed using data either provided in or transformed to the North American Vertical
Datum of 1988 (NAVD 88). All elevations shown or referenced in this study are referenced to NAVD 88.
If comparisons are to be made to previously mapped elevations that reference the National Geodetic
Vertical Datum of 1929 (NGVD29) a conversion factor of -1.07 feet can be applied in Beaufort County.
All data used in this study is georeferenced to the North Carolina State Plane (FIPS 3200) referenced to
the North American Datum of 1983 (NAD83).
4.2 Base Map
Data for the development of base mapping was compiled from 20 foot DEM grid cells generated from
LIDAR and distributed through NC OneMap. The topographic model used for extracting cross section
data to assess the effect of the proposed restoration also included a ground run field survey for the
subject property.
4.3 Floodplain and Floodway Delineation
The floodplain and floodway delineation that is depicted on the FIRM Panel 5662 J with effective date of
May 15, 2003 is the result of a redelineated detailed study. The original hydraulic study provided
through the FEMA Engineering Library was completed in 1982. Detailed information, including model
parameters, was not able to be acquired through a reasonable research of data resources. The FIS
report for the study area provided information regarding engineering methods and other
documentation that was incorporated into this Flood Study. Geolocated NFHL data were imported into
the drawing to provide a comparison to model results and can be seen in the map exhibits. The NFHL
data provided elevation data of BFEs and cross sections along Horse Branch that were used as
comparisons for the model results as well as known downstream conditions.
4

Hudson — Flood Study Report
• March 3, 2014
Section 5: Results
5.1 Floodplain Boundaries
The following table provides a summary of the hydraulic modeling results.
Table 3: Base Flood Water - Surface Elevation Comparison
cross
Section
A
8
C
D
E
F
FIRM,
511512003
Model Estimates
of FIRM
Increase
(8 -A)
Proposed Model
Estimates
Increase
(D -8)
Increase
(D -A)
89 (BFE)
28
28
0
28
0
0
90
-
28.76
-
28.77
0.01
-
91(BFE)
30
30.17
0.17
30.22
0.05
0.22
92 (X -sec)
30.5
31.04
0.54
31.05
0.01
0.55
93 (BFE)
33
33.35
0.35
33.05
-0.30
0.05
94
-
33.76
-
33.43
-0.33
-
95 (BFE)
35
34.93
-0.07
34.80
-0.13
-0.20
The model approximating the existing FIRM base flood elevations are within 1' of published values. The
• proposed conditions are also within 1' of the existing base flood elevations. These results confirm that
there is no significant rise in base flood elevation. The floodplain boundaries were plotted on the base
mapping to estimate the changes in the extent of the floodplain boundary. The grading activities in the
floodplain increase the extent of the floodplain boundary landward. The increase is less than 20' and
likely due to a decrease in ground elevation in the vicinity of the channel (excavation /bank grading),
which allows for an increase in backwater without an increase in elevation. Other contributing
differences include possible differences in compiled base mapping and roughness variability that were
approximated in this study.
•
Section 6: Supplemental Study
6.1 Hydraulic Analysis
The supplemental study was provided to inform the design process and understand the expected 100
year flooding extents. Exhibit 8 provides detailed mapping and hydraulic calculations for this analysis.
This study included a hydraulic analysis of the proposed design conditions using the hydrologic
information provided in Table 2. The following table provides a summary of the hydraulic modeling
results.
5

•
lJ
Table 4: Average Hydraulic Characteristics
Stream
2yr Q
2yr D
2yr V
Reach
i
(cfs)
(ft)
(ft /s)
1
5.6
0.50
1.78
2
17.2
1.06
1.34
3
8.0
0.76
1.32
4
26.2
2.15
0.65
5
39.2
0.80
1.16
D: Depth, V. Velocity, T. Shear Stress
Hudson - Flood Study Report
March 3, 2014
10yr V
(ft 15)
1 00y V
(ft 15)
2yr T
(Ib /ft2)
10yr T
(Ib/ft2)
100yr T
(Ib/f)
2.24
2.56
0.44
0.50
0.65
1.80
1.70
1.09
1.55
2.16
0.17
0.24
0.29
2.00
0.16
0.23
0.29
1.64
0.04
0.08
0.17
2.04
0.23
0.34
0.47
These values represent maximum cross - sectional parameters for each project reach. It should be noted
that only select cross sections were examined as part of this analysis. Generally, calculated channel
velocities and shear stress values are below ranges that would suggest instability.
Section 7: Select References
Federal Emergency Management Agency. (2004). Flood Insurance Study, Beaufort County, North
Carolina (Unincorporated Areas). Washington, D.C.
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Hydrologic Engineering Center. (2010). HEC RAS River Analysis System,
Version 4.1, Computer Program. Davis, California.
NC OneMap Geospatial Data. (2007). Statewide Elevation Contours - 2 Foot Interval.
L

•
Hudson — Flood Study Report
March 3, 2014
Exhibit 3
Proposed Base Flood map & Detailed Area
0
•

Hudson — Flood Study Report
March 3, 2014
Exhibit 4
Proposed Hydraulic Calculations & Cross Sections
0
0

•
•
•
r
2
m im
d
O
O
r
O
Lo
Cl)
N
N
N
N
O
o
o
co
C
N
7
U
c
cN
�
d
0
0 Ln
N
r
O
N
O
o
(N
n
O o N
I,
U
�
O (3
U
C
Q
�
-0
O
o
Ll
L
m
m
O
r
N
N
�
O
r
Y
Cn N
O O
j
O
Q
C
0 V
7
C
U
O
p
rI�
L1J
O
co
V N
m Cl)
O CA CO v
Cl) N N N
N
N
(u) UOIJEA913
2
Ur

•
C:
0
L)
Exhibit 5
Correspondence
Hudson — Flood Study Report
March 3, 2014

. Kip Mumaw
From: Brubaker, Dan <Dan.Brubaker @ncdps.gov>
Sent: Tuesday, December 17, 2013 1:56 PM
To: Kip Mumaw
Subject: RE: Flood Study - UT Horse Branch
Good afternoon, Mr. Mumaw. Horse Branch and Horse Branch Tributary are both redelineated streams, taken from
earlier flood studies. Unfortunately, we do not have a copy of the original hydraulic model. They may be available from
the FEMA Engineering Library: .
http: / /www.fema.gov /national - flood- insurance- progra m- flood- hazard - mapping /how- order - technical- administ rative-
support
Sorry we couldn't help with this data request. Please let me know if I can help with anything else, though, or if you have
any questions.
Best regards,
Dan Brubaker
John D. Brubaker, PE, CFM
NFIP Engineer
ANC Department of Public Safety
NC Floodplain Mapping Program
4218 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699 -4218
(919) 825 -2300
dan.brubaker @ncdps.gov
www.ncdps.gov
From: Kip Mumaw Finai Ito: [e-mail]]
Sent: Tuesday, December 17, 2013 11:09 AM
To: Brubaker, Dan
Subject: Flood Study - UT Horse Branch
Hi Mr. Brubaker,
I'm working on an EEP project in Beaufort County, NC and was hoping you would be able to send me the existing flood
study information for Horse Branch in the vicinity of the project. Please find the attached EEP Checklist information for
details on site location. If you should need any additional information or have any questions, please don't hesitate to
contact me.
Thank you,
Kip Mumaw, PE
• Manager
ECOSYSTEM SERVICES, LLC
270 Valentine Mill Road
L

Louisa, VA 23093
•
540.2M 1428
www.ecosystemllc.com
Ecosystem ServicesFacebook
kip ecosystemllc.com
—the creative solution
This message contains confidential information and is intended only for the individual named. If you a re not the named addressee you should not
disseminate, distribute or copy this e-mail. Please notify the sender immediately by e-mail if you have received this e-mail by mistake and delete
this e-mail from your system. E -mail transmission cannot be guaranteed to be secure or error -free as information could be intercepted, corrupted,
lost, destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses. Ecosystem Services, LLC therefore does not accept liability for any errors or omissions
in the contents of this message, which arise as a result of e-mail transmission. If verification is required please request a hard -copy version.
'A Please consider the environment before printing this email
E -mail correspondence sent to and from this address may be subject to the provisions of G.S. 132 -1, the North
Carolina Public Records Law, and may be subject to monitoring and disclosed to third parties, including law
enforcement personnel, by an authorized state official.
•

. Kip Mumaw
From: Lauren Gillooly < Lauren.Gillooly @riskmapcds.com>
Sent: Monday, December 30, 2013 10:27 AM
To: kip @ecosystemllc.com
Subject: Data Request Completion
Attachments: Final Payment Request.pdf
Kip,
Good morning, I have finished the research for your request B1404089. I was able to locate effective hardcopy HEC2
covering your area of interest (Between cross - sections 092 -133) for Horse Branch in Beaufort Co., NC. Also I found
handwritten hydrology for the unincorporated areas of Beaufort Co., but cannot verify hydrology. All data appears on
microfiche therefore parts may be too blurred /bright making it difficult to read due to the quality of the originals. I have
attached the final fees, if you wish to purchase the available data please let me know and send in the final payment. If
you do NOT wish to purchase the available information please also let me know so that I may close your case. You will
have two weeks from today to decide otherwise your case will be closed. Thank you.
Sincerely,
Lauren Gillooly
•

Hudson — Flood Study Report
•
Exhibit 6
FEMA Released HEC -2 Calculations (1982)
•
0
March 3, 2014

Ll
•
•

•
•
�
o
.P•a
.
-
e
l.�
ry JO 000 d , '� -
°• q q d ax
!
., .•
_
,n l�
,�
• • ° l •
gdo-1. aoo �r•+o goaooui
n1.11�
-
i+�mIr
16-1 .0-1 11 4tm1
c •a o
n
....
;^I � .
wi
s
O'000 ",n,,{IO 00'4.1 'Q e- OOO,w PO_
•1 •+ A N 1 t '
4 n
_
wl
' *�
W •
O
� 1
1 1 �
'
- ° a 'o •o ci r- v o a n
OJ P000 P,
• N
y,
1
Oa - .61000 _ •1 'r •N
-j
'
�
•00000'610 O'O �m'amO Na�•�61P
• I t N.•
O
�
1 ,1•I" 1 6tW 1 /,1 NmN 1
N
W 61
w O
O O a
, • - +
' -
-
oo' o. -aom- au'• 1a
..
O pt]ONI'O OHO ^'M a•i0 P6f0041/1
1 1 N "1. /. 1 .6S .,
o.
'♦
1 1 1 H'1 t �N
n m•
K
a
°`
-_ W
''oo uo ,60o
04 po t0 000 N61- m t
W
C = •
o q
Rooana•, aoa a,ni ia'o' �N.00NB
H
2
H x
O
M
- W ,•••
i
00` 00 00 Ob0 G00 ad
r
N •
:r ;q :Y1N qY1 N i • ,
w O
2 1
1 O .i 1'
-00.J+.•�10 ONPOnN -
NOO'µ Mb
N
r
.
• m _
W
O + 1 1 1
t N 9
O
-
- y,
U
W
• • C' • O
O � .'1 1
O? O O a a Q O O O a 7 a
6000 a aa�• 0
O+
.'p
N
X
--
�O
O f 0 X 1 0 M O O � ±• • 1 �
�m000P m' ••A'00 ^yi0 0an 076)'
�,
• N
"a
r
�
� t Vi d LL7 O P t I t •+ 1 �
• O 61 •
^ ^'
N
2
1G0 'OOOd O 000 q J m •+
-
_ •
m`
A'
♦Om�1m OmO)A :1NO NO..1O N'0 3
� O N•
�
C •. `
�� 1�'M N nl N '1 N 1 N "1 '1 1- 1 1 Ir1
a 6N �
•
b
<
O R '• ,
'�i61 e
r
q >
• • C
�
-
y
'
•,y > «
♦ QO�±
O
U
y' -
00 O ad ' O 00'0 0 : �,
.N D ± ':Cf • 1 i
; :
�M �
2
D: _
0. +�
iO4
fO
�
±m ONONN 0.600•�L 61m OOOOCI,
-1
�
•n00 •
U.
k' �,
u
� 1 .f �m { .• -i K1P0 6 N
�-'
61 .
. �
LL a n
.. o
�
• 'rn W r o.''
4 4 �
�
G•
iaga ao a�ee
rWli+
o
uC11.
za c,.
e0 adaq cao ,
o qa .�aaand In•a d
I
i -i
• W i' •
O
W Q "Y
H O
'd
r6 01 • • • s ,
:•tP0 • �P 61
•WJ U��•
'✓OC'N V
m
•
O O
- q 1 +0 •
• ♦2 - W
M• t .aN t .• • ,A Ot .7.m N 1 N
4
• K •
W W W
a -
• W L
� 1� e1 rV iw'K •.•+� n N. et of A T w N K11� ti� &.
_
�G
1.1 N iet 4
N
s IM1 Mti ,!1
,
, ,
•

•
N
4
t
G >�d
AAO�V
00
r 0
O
Q
r
�'O
roYd
��
W
s `
t^"'tRP
M ♦ •O :0a0
f �i> i _
•,•p s
♦ • •Oil �
� ! • • • •
000
♦�•
ONO
p ?
O.+NO
COC "rOOCQO
ado ab w�'wo
OONOq
OONO
040tp P
�Op
%YF
d++YHC
ONNMN
nr
A
Ar
•r .
•
ooa�u
o °ouo °o
°a °0
•
�
aoo
NF0
o+, oq,
wW
� -'
,
-O'
•
gnWO
0 ♦;OH SAN
oaO PN N.IM '00
M<00
OOw•G
pO SNC "H
OOP P'0,
1
O:+O
1 `c 1
,
1'
1 ♦! N I
1 1 1 N'.I N •'
i t i H N H H 4
i! A'< 1
i f 1 R I
i' 1 P f i('1
- O 1 1 4 n1
,
''
aq
_,�0q0
OOOaO
Na ,
O
000
0�0_
•y =. �
O
"
da`NR
000a FNea
OOOpir 000
opP�NO
oowo'
ooOtSp
I "rth0!
�? "o`oC ao"
1't rtaT1
cr .•.p r.
ihi
1 M,n91
1'./ tSPnc
+ /,i 1'+I.M WMP
N rt N
i 1 N -1
A W
!`irl
H_'
i
n M
n
A
o
•
+i M
_
m 0 Yi rt
.♦N
a N
r.i :titiN
- _
d
'�
Roe
40000
000000
00000a
000 -
OOq
e -
nOa
0 op AC
O NO,
AG
C
4%04
Oii y
08000
�ii
i i iN .
.OM .
Om
• -O nA
,
N i
i i '
N
taNFO
i0i
00Ct`NPN.O
.
OONOMIO .10
.00P10'O
oOwa
't =0;4
OOOOrON
1•�•' M'
NoCpOa
.+P 1 I_ ='"1 �
Owa
q1 1
,
_
w 1
1 +-, `.'S �+Nt
f l y ANNHC
t tOA f 1
I
_
•
0
' >
V
q>
.r .74
Gq
.A +.t4r000
0000q +a
0.d 0 as 0a0
OtJOOaDOtl
O.rt 000000
OPti'�
as " >0
0060
0000
1000
r G Oa
O Oa
O0
QN ^
ada -
OJO
r0 :0
.
M
• •
Oa Oa
• • •0400
000....
4100 A�FON
♦
MOJHa
r000
OgNP
•00
QOOMP ..•+000.•0
• •.•
OM,P -r
O
Rr.n 1
1 OuNNH0
Y�` OPn rtPP..
Nt01
.10.0m
1 P I WO
P i 1 M
OJm
N♦?,t"
N
.9Nrt
.w:a?M1 C.,n P'
P IIpNN'H .0
NP m A A'
i•H'F
.♦ HH
1
000
$oaoaa>
o IS000ao
OGaO
+oaD
`Dq0
aJ oo
0'o qA
°o +ao 00
oow oP
oQo
JOq
Op>
dq'oopa
rRrl00tl f0
o g000aq
0 ' O ".1HONN
pooa"
aO W .l
Q P a
MO Qi t•,
ON pl ^ pM
O :p
:
"
O
OWNO
0.+.♦'1,
00Mp%+N
N^+H N +N N'.
0tl'OPP mM1O
q 1 oANNNA
rOOO O'O
NS rt:t i
00Frt
104N
`qa Fr
u I VP-
NOQ'OOf
Prt l0M"
OM1rt
GlN
c
>•
7 000000
0000
ptfd
00 ,�d
O d
Op06
H
dc00
d0
O ` >O
{Ogg00
dOC 00
.tIp OC+p O
a 000000
O ad0000
0000
005,30
.O,�iO
Ot,'O
1 .Q
ROMP Iti
♦9+00NNw
oOh o�.�l 1pmN
M`^t O,nO
a +7001
•NOON
ogW00T
Ov,OP
N
i
wroMC
l N s N'
OC WPM O:Y
M ^'l 0 r ul
10 i 4.NN 4,N0
P N +0 .♦ N n N
N�pOW l
N H N n
116'0 •r
H N M
m { Om
A N A
1 1,l 1 <O
t•
•0dg1
H N'M.
>
Q O
G F
000
ra OGy
.tM O
CJ30G
W
GgOa00
IF NN
Opoa
ONO :
ORtw
Rlp �
O Oi11
0 0 :
0
cD O �I'�
•"-+>o
N
dM�m
:PC
Aq ON'NPa
MO.+rP NPP
NOrt Po
'Al; ON
GSOp�p
• •
Na.lONO
Ndw +'
N NON
tNOH N.iH
n1 HnN NON N,
WlrtH1
I+OMN
1rl MJr
1' 1N
�pN N•
Od O""�
70 ORO
0 O 00G0
QO pa0
� 0
O
O
n Co
P
0' "
� :0
•ao X00
•QO •0000
00 • a
• •O
♦ •a
+00
•a
O
Mq,NM
M a6
O LnO artl.a'
/ N N 0
0 '�NpOAPN
N`.IOF
--0,7
Om OP
I '` ^'[O
OO N-
r .• t 'r6
� O:r
1' / •N
OqP
�•
Oa
O, -'S, 4'004
O pp ^0040
O00 J4
00,0
ROOao
>0 q0�f
QO
Od
r
]p
' :
�a
,da ?. "�
e9 �d
KQ'�00
A•194i i i
qOp OOR
® 00 1 i i0i
adC00
a 1�1i i
a0C
�•~ � �
Na J'�
a : '.00
rtL':
pr
PaaM
ON,n NAPO
Nc WMP NhM
NH +N+A
`O.�NM1
OMa NN
.1 .papMP
^S
aONM1
N
.•I .IN
'.t !N;'•H
r rtANNN
�+ Aa
t Mrt
1 .+Nrt
C / w
.•r6I
l7
1 � ', m
.tK +K2
Xa•ap-
41 i�.�KK Y'w
>•I+• %U 0UU
•: i�wivNK NH
01J %a>UUgU
F.10.'. Y'+'
OXitrUp
H.12 tY.
IJXU U
tYw
2 RX;ap
T.1NH1�1..
N it X It Or pO
N+ryll:
XM U
�.

•
•
O d O
w i i 'i _ 04 v • a -
N d o a • • • • • • a • . i i'• s • • s
fORQ 04�N4. °'1OO OOd 06
.
OOPOrY O O i GO�� �ea4000 G .,
tt3i 44 @`Q
-
0 oQQ PTO .G -o�
O
�
OOQ Y/r•h d700W+00 NfNO OQN1N0 n001P �O` 00
•!
d4N0
-
00 0000 V
✓
OHO r Y:G :OO .
i1/P / 1 .ON 1 1 1
O "Q OCA44 'OOO±p
,
' ,040 Q4J
o o, `o Q..`iaiQ ooa' o .•o o, w�'
,'
OMVfO o,o QNP cagoo
• .
oo GC'n n4 OAb OrO, -fw�dQ 00
I 111NN/ IIINN,N HC /1 i N1,
111G'N•: 1+ ;i 1t+i'Y)N- Nr1 1
8
,
COQ OQ yy'O 00 O 000 0 ONO Ou 0
> O : 'O : E
r
q GO .'Q .O • • i! • •.• • �•
!^ YET? • #y0 # O' 00 @ • 00.: i �N �
N 1 / ,0•i 'N 1
!
RNr •y Ns � _
�
i
Od '000 00 OC 00 O 000 X00 O O
O <? G n O U Q O O N 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 O J -
Q :m °n + �° •° • i
'
. .o
04
GaO 01, @�1N01 OOI' ifl 1 ,
", 14rR
3
Oj i N n 1�NN y�v MY ifl NN
N �Y,N
? fvvu h C C.r O O O :OO Q i 1 � • •�
'00
• JOh000
R OPR ,Om
••
1'
JP> PP ++P OAP A HOOP
ONN
Q 0 i t Itl 1- N OO.O N 1" I N 1 1 1 1 �
N
�
I.1 '9 4 i 1A 1 Y i
Q 0 O�
70 O O .QOAO
ti'
4>'m J4� b C O On'1
0S,4v LO O q :N � r0 d
O .-r P V♦ O 4 @ � Q N O d A.W O • •' • f • ! • O • .
NO wC.10 00
+PO
S
N AO �,ORF Jd�f OVU4 O a,pPF aCONr
t Yt
Jl I I rN4 N e-
f 4
-
t
O O A
��
a on n n c .. 0 4a: o �P �•••ei ••
N04P f000N. '10; 000 QO ..
�G
OOUNOf,R Ot.. d'OOPO +1000,09
11 N �N ti'1 NN
N 1 1 •n � tl` t 1 ..i 1 i U .p 1p
!•
'NY
'oAd= ow? >an odoe aoo °' ?? ooA ,
°s°.,. o aoq a•� � i i : i i on aQ�a'
'rl �
In,
.1
a a .r . «..+ 1n a r m :. �'n �.:: m .e it , .1 1n .r .r •. ,m�as x'v�i m m x c,�
�
_ �, iy ,+ ae
apt KRAd zwx xAd P "x ysxo@
•

E
.7
nFano
. . . . . . . . . . . .
Z..*.* -0 40 0 4" 494;
.
. . • .
. . . .
.
..
....
...
.
*
*
l
M a,
.1 0*
4 J*
o
�"O�v
4,
.
...
....
.
NP en
iff O.eP
1. 1. 1.
TI. 1. 1
11.11,
1. 1.
nFano
. . . . . . . . . . . .
Z..*.* -0 40 0 4" 494;
.
. . • .
. . . .
.

•
•
- - - - - - - - - - - -
O�NN
mdaaN
-�OmtO
AAAd'
PNR'd
GNde
M1YmN
Nhn «dYnAd
N
4 m N
b± m i
i i P
A• l i
i« M1
s i i
:; n l4
N:, w m
p
Nmnm
HN,Hf
NHYm
«f N.,
«fd1
fdU
H�NO
wHNO
NNM1H
r!
m N P d
O II, d� O
T Iil « 4 t
H m m P
O m d h
«� 6 A 1M -
d O« t•
m O f C
. pl « P, F
N
f u
W : : i
! :NiC
H« : :
sm
h 'Hd
4
O R
F:
P
-
d m
oil:
WN M ti
A m H
My
�
N M1
W
.
0
PY
N
AN
0
ON AAN
H d
tin N'
,
H
O
f
l:AN ,
V
nN
«N «
f,f
HHf N
NHO
H
A
f ff N
If f [
IT
P N ««
N Y pR
m!F Ah
NOmN
Am0 ♦ _
W O«R
OmM1f
•'1,DwK1
HhmN,
H
« m m
R O N N
H NNN
m 0 A 4
: q P«
P m h N
sly p
m P h N
_Pin np
di CiT
R
N «.+H
b M1h'f
m Y N m
isNm
d d
ism
Ylf
m Y' f-
f «
m l u m �
•�+ •f
N f p«
• •HN
its! m P
NbM O '
d m R N
NNN
N «wM
w «.i
««
fNNN
N,N ««
•a
H!N
Nm
w N
RP[�N
AwOH
h N«
M1ON•N
Af OH +
FNNC
Hi0
m•
P
m
P
iAiIn,Ni i
i fNiNb
f
i
i4i
b
0
.4OONONN n
N
11.1
d
d
M1
h
H
N d m '
W
.113,
NiNNNfN
NfiP N
NNNN
NNNN
,NNNN �4
e
pua.0
PNwY
ohRm
PNef
Ym1i�
fmPh
R r
•
�
¢
O OHO O
'
O N
R O« N
fNCiN
N N N N
NNNN
O O O O
« N A f
NNNN - "NNNN
H A 4 N
O.O O O
A H 4 N
NNNN 7
{
'
_
J
�« w d
A.,O
NP H H N
Hdw
� N 4 N'
a «b
n d O d
Am
H�� N
9
f N d N
mN :N
N H Y F
nsAO
O N h N
Nm4:
d %• A N
«NNa•
O «N H
Y N
N H f d
N f f d'
A Y N M1
A -Y N 1M1
l�
a N NNN
f N N N
N NNN N
NNNN
PRO
NNNN
NNNN
NNNN
NNNN
NNN N
d O C 0
p 0 0 0
O Q,Q O
O g C 0
p O O O
O O O O
0 0 0 41
O 0 0 0
O G D O
O0o0
0000
OOmG
OOOO
0:00
0000
000 :
00.00
00 GO
N o N 0
O N Na
O N N o
N N a
O
M1.,W N N
h d N N
N N h N
N N M1 N
N N h M
N N h N
FOR
N N M1 M
N N F N
1
F�M1n`.
Dboa
,DOmQ
aaom
mpom
oaDO
LigseO
aoa
rxw
T :PP
`A w `
1411
« 1.
mm �m
mm mm
ammm
« w «
J
V
f Y a e
Sts
N NNwN
NNNN
NNNN
NNNN
NNNN
N N N U?
�
� „1tf N
�oe0
RHN
NNNN
Nii i
-
:I
dap d,d
00.0
cmeJ'O
b000
oil1
o0
OO UJ
11H
�'aG
J
W
a K 4 Y
NNNN
NNNN
i
1
W.ANb
,NNN
O�AO
'
O
h
P P P P
PY Ja?
G90a 0
QOO G
Oan J
M1 M1 h
d W d d
Ohp O
O L aU
O O Q
Pm•.P
pp�0
4
J
W
'
Y Q
N N N M
� -
NNNN
'
.a0
C.90
O4!'iC
O•]oa"
00 >O
�O'
W
Yi K, N.N
�:>
t-.0 O �
vOGI>
H
•
RRTT
T.JO
OOpO
O..00
YYY f
Yf-YY
00
HHHA
C > �
1AH1
«n «w
rein
NNNN
Y
.. w w «
6 • R R P
« « «
-
.
W^ C
-
1444
-a O'^ ;�
9
`u
�� 1 i
'♦
•i t i
i t• s
A:::
: f f Y•
m
W
dddd
hmM1
Fhhs
•
11.
hhF M1.
mmmm
- U
N
Mbdd
1 ««
«n1«
« .N .L
«w nM
.a A .
1 «,.!i ««
Pitt.
edn -n
54
•

•
•
H
H
Y
f >a
W
'
u
4
anau
aoaa
aobo:
'd000
0000
aoua .ocoa
+.�oaa '
a0o0
NNNN
oa0 :
ao0o
m�0o0
'aooq OVpO
o000
_
' !
J.
OOOO�'A00
NNNN
OOpO
600,0
NNNN
,006 000
O004W
�
'
J
}.
'03
."1 T1 i1N
NNNN
0000
MNti�i`
0000
�O •pi10 �0
N'•616 .6
ffPP
@,N @i6 0.00,.E
0000 NNNN
'OQ�
C1 e. i^I n1
'•�MAHH
hHHH
e4fP _ _
.IHM
qaF
0004
OOOe
M10.6H
HN ;/`
ON.pH
fmTO
R� @O
NN
�,H HN QmNe
a :M : +•Pw
pU�iN
DO :M ��
Nei!)H
;
OONO
OOOH
OWN4
Nf FN
M.6 i6R
NNNN N @O@
f4ea
'�
6
O
F
@NPR'
NHHH
W b PR
HH
.D `D {O .I
P
RH•6N
NHHe
fH P@
NNN
Rd 00
!!?NF@
Hw NN .+NN
�N•
w.
H
�
NN.L [i
cooa
poop
opoa
oga'a
ooap
,aopa oa aa•
ooaa
c
r
.
l
:.,•
'�H�.♦
OiiHP
HRH @M'
@N -C.M
NONN
EIYf HO H @M@
NN@N
o -.+IN i
�N :.�
H@ :C.
00, 6Y �
�i0 �N !'N @,
s ii/J
"
N
• ••
Wool ,
v h ``0 .6
R O�� a r? e
.'.. -1 .+ .•
O
NNN
ded
NRN
@T
N00
W,NN
R
�'H.IR
dN
iii
eii
ih•�
'oe:
:e
.tuii •Wi
e'ir
�
.e w
.+
9 N N
O H i'•1
O w♦ •1
O' n
0 � N O,.i a w1
0 .� .+
p
zA
1
1
a wM
NONh
NnN'.+
@HHN
4@.6.L
NIL @@
NN NR 90
Na.�w
u
N�N
,60•D
.6 .i @R
FHHO
.+ ��?
N :NN
No
N
W FOO
�OpO
1610 @0
wmRN-
♦'}P e.6
o^1 ..N
R n.IN QN.Ow
N W F�
1
a
i4
ti.+�N
n.rN
�n .w �♦N
HNN
NNNN
MN.HH
•Heft ee PP'
e Y
i
M
p
W
CIIAp
n�
ROq
-p uu a;0
aa'Y�
0 ^OPT.
C4D61 0000
CC04
.6
,S
m
Q
3�f•O
•..
WH @N
w
@H @N
000
•••
@H @N
O'.�
a
OH• @N
00
♦•
an 4•�
000
^ »•.
ON QO
C0 0�1A6
•• ••
N.6 N�6 NN N'ai
0�
•.
In .64'14
!�
O
e'.]'f±�p
FaD
F�
O,F�
NN OIA
YtHN+^
Fr6 N .r Cie
F,••NP
M
J
121 i
« : e
: :' 0i
W
0.
W
R RRR
RR RR
RRRR
6.RITR
FI'� w,w
.b •G dd
HHi1 i'! '.11 .6 d.D
d d.6 .0
O
,•.
N 1
r
•

0
•
•
w
,
< a
0.
-
� �p �Y
:00 :
a00J
a.0'Oe
0.000
0000
0000
OOOO
OOpO
'
V
J
R�PP'P
a0,00
OGOa
OAAO
G'D00
0000
ODaa
p fP f`p�gp
.y
M� -OHO
00 ^O
000
..
PPPP
Nnwlti
yA /Aq yA
�
y1 yAM
NNY1'Ia
n
aS CN
OQp rm i
ci
cy'e
ccOC
cote
OOC N`
0000
0000
OOJO"
•
• • • •
• •.
�
4 tanb
Nm NC
Atl y,.m
-
' Y
Y,
P O O d
A O
g O d 0
O O O O
-
O•
Oa0
400 •
••�•
0000
•••
000a
• ••
q0.'i O�
f
P O•+P
NY'1
hrAn O
Il nlaa
s •5
ar+mM
• :nP
400a
• � • •
"�•� � i�
ON•fP
Yt •t R'
�
V: W o
?
W
r• Yf M �•
-
fh '1 � N
n'N�N N
•
• M •
•. � ! ♦
�ih i
C
ebv
h.:P
i
N
�i i
s i i T
• h i t
•
♦� b M
i 4
I i i
O b F
±� :
r:± e
•
�
e�
Orr
O n
O H
a•
ON N
•
On
• •H
On • ,-
Ow n ,
W
i 1 � �
'�
P6 0 :.a
:.a G .D
•l m /l rfl
O N .a l(1
N �1 0 A
6 A{S h N
..{' II M
1
v
j � �
••
�
+
Y
# 4 G n
N m
. q �f . a n
# N 0 if1
g n N M
0 N, m, M1
- N h f, m
N N N Aft
N M t b
NON 0 vl
N f f b
� O F
a7 < W F
•
O m ,D m
L
U'1 O P Ia
-Uf N N P
Uf m Rt 0
!n N N m
" b
f
O0i 0
�" ♦_
G+O.'10 '\
dOta 0
O r q
en OCf
alOc.9
0 aA
�
G O i0
00 : :
OG
00 Od
A0 0.
OC ++0
0
N.V
N
R�NN
NNe..^
NNP`4M
M1VI f��
NIPFc
N11FP
NV1 l+^
NUYP.Y54
i
ti
.
_ 0
V
•
i i ♦�
?�••
i i i i
�i �� i
i "� A
N M M,N
^S : Mt r1
a� y f
U
N
ti
F�hF
'FM1hr
hhhF
hhh
m,a,SD
W
n w
n n
r n n w
n .♦ n n
,y
aia ray
n .+ n
09NY
n n n �.•

•
•
C7

Hudson — Flood Study Report
Exhibit 7
EEP Floodplain Requirements Checklist
0
17-�
March 3, 2014

�J
•
EEP Floodplain Requirements Checklist
This form was developed by the National Flood Insurance program, NC Floodplain
Mapping program and Ecosystem Enhancement Program to be filled for all EEP projects.
The form is intended to summarize the floodplain requirements during the design phase
of the projects. The form should be submitted to the Local Floodplain Administrator
with three copies submitted to NFIP (attn. State NFIP Engineer), NC Floodplain Mapping
Unit (attn. State NFIP Coordinator) and NC Ecosystem Enhancement Program.
Project Location
Name of project:
Hudson Property — Stream Mitigation Project
Name of stream or feature:
UT Horse Branch — Chocowinity Creek
County:
Beaufort County
Name of river basin:
Tar - Pamlico River (CU: 03020104)
Is project urban or rural?
Rural
Name of Jurisdictional
municipality /county:
Beaufort County
DFIRM panel number for
entire site:
Panel: 5662
Number: 370013
Consultant name:
Albemarle Restorations, LLC
Phone number:
(252) 333 -0249
Address:
P.O. Box 176
Fairfield, NC 27826
FEMA_ Floodplain _Checklist4- 23- 12.docx Page I of

•
•
•
Design Information
Provide a general description of project (one paragraph). Include project limits on a
reference orthophotograph at a scale of 1" = 500 ".
The North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources Ecosystem
Enhancement Program has selected 13.49 acres of land positioned on 106.51 acres of the
property owned by Charles E. Hudson for this full delivery contract, for stream
restoration to fulfill a portion of the Request for Proposals (RFP): Full Delivery Project
Tar - Pamlico River Basin, RFP 16- 004106 The RFP and subsequent contract(s)
awarded by EEP provide compensatory stream, wetland and /or buffer mitigation within
the Tar- Pamlico River Basin Cataloging Unit 03020104. Albemarle Restorations, LLC
entered into a contract with the State of North Carolina on June 12, 2012 to deliver 2,700
stream mitigation units on the Hudson project site. See attached map as requested.
Hudson Pro er — Stream Restoration Summar
Reach
Len th
Priority
Reach 1
833
One Restoration
Reach 2
532
One /Two Restoration
Reach 3
445
One /Two (Restoration)
Reach 4
437
One /Two Restoration
Reach 5
644
Two Restoration
Floodplain Information
Is project located in a Special Flood Hazard Area (SFHA)?
E Yes C No
If project is located in a SFHA, check how it was determined:
' Redelineation
Detailed Study
F Limited Detail Study
r Approximate Study
r Don't know
List flood zone designation: Zone AE and Zone X
Check if applies:
P7 AE Zone
U Floodway
C Non Encroachment
FEMA _Floodplain_Checklist4 -23 -12 Page 2 of 4

•
•
•
r- None
T° A Zone
r Local Setbacks Required
C NoZocal Setbacks, Regirired?',
If local setbacks are required, list how many feet:
Does proposed channel boundary encroach outside floodway /non-
encroachment /setbacks?
r Yes.
Land Acquisition (Check)
F State owned (fee simple)
r Conservation easment (Design Bid Build)
r Conservation Easerrent (Full Delivery Project)
Note: if the project property is state - owned, then all requirements should be addressed to
the Department of Administration, State Construction Office (attn: Herbert Neily,
(919) 807 -4101)
Is community /county participating in the NFIP program?
r ` Yes t7-'No
Note: if community is not participating, then all requirements should be addressed to
NFIP (attn: State NFIP Engineer, (919) 715 -8000)
Name of Local Floodplain Administrator: Billy Merrill, PLS, CFM (City of Greenville)
Phone Number: 252- 329 -4478
Floodplain Requirements
This section to be filled by designer /applicant following verification with the LFPA
r ' No Action
r No Rise
i' Letter of Map Revision
F Conditional Letter of Map Revision
17 Other Requirements
List other requirements:
FEMA_ Floodplain _Checklist4- 23- 12.docx Page 3 of 4

•
•
•
Comments: Flood Study has been performed showing "no rise" in base flood elevations
due to the proposed project.
Name: William K. Mumaw, PE Signature:
Title: Engineer Date: 2/26/14
FEMA_ Floodplain _Checklist4- 23- 12.docx Page 4 of 4
Iwl.

Hudson — Flood Study Report
iMarch 3, 2014
Exhibit 8
Supplemental Hydraulic Study
•
0

J
:7
}
� a
y
ej � ti
OL
1
{e
r
r ry
1

`UVG�� a
^q,
!9
North Carolina streamStats
b
•
Streanistats Ungaged Site Report
Date: Wed Feb 26 201411:03 :54 Mountain Standard Tbm
Site Location: North Carolina
NAD27 latitude: 35.4522 (35 27 08)
NA 027 Longitude: - 77.1063 ( -77 06 23)
NAD83 latitude: 35.4524 (35 27 09)
NAD83 Longitude: - 77.1060 ( -77 06 22)
Drainage Area: 1.96 mil
Percent titban: 9.4 %
Percent hmpervbus: 1.2 %
OWk NOW ion Grid Basin chw=ftdW=
0016 Pu* soutband US 2009 S1S8 1.% mil
Paranretar
Value
RaOracsbn Eguatbn Valid lian0
MN I max
10
Draiiage Area (square
Percent Area in Region 1 (percent)
0.000
Percent Area in Region 2 (percent) O.ODO 10
Percent Area in Region 3 (percent) O.000I l =
Percent Area in Region 4 (percent)l 1100.0001 � 10
Percent Area h Region 5 (percent) 0.000
Waming: Some parameters are outside the suggested range. Estimates will be extrapolations with unknown errors.
wandard
l ror (Pt
EquMalmut
Yaant of
rewrd 11
0- Parent Predb#bn Lrtm
MNbnum I
I Ma -knum

0
�
0
?
�
9
7 9
3 v C k
�
E )
cu
3 �
k
�
f
2 \
±
2 \
�
>
\
/
§
\
\
)
m
0
2
{
/
0
,a

•
•
•
�
000
°s.
sass
sass
sass
s
s
sass
����
��
sass
"s.
"s. "s,
"s.
sass
sass
���
df
4444
F
SS
SdoS
°S
sS�m
n.�8
8�V12
4
8 A
R
8a8
888
�
�
o
d
ood
d 6
d
o d
d
d d
o d
d
o d
o
D o
d o
c
o o
l
d d
d d
d
d d
d
d d
d d
c
�a
W
d
6
h
U
o
d
O d
C
d
6
0 0
0
O O
O
d O
O G I
I
pv
$a_
N v
RnR$
6
3 ^0��
R F'
8
8 V
8 R
a
692
88
887
V
V :S8
''qN9
5`.3AR
SSa
536
3
IN
S!$
Vm
AR
X 8O
5
sWAs
r;@sN
�aem
1�
8E39S
C
m
d
d d
c4
d
do
dddd
U
6 v
_
U
$m88
mmm
X958
d d
d d
X1988
d
d o
F3800
goon
rpRF
d d
d d
8993
d
d d
d
rnFp
d d
d d
RrFr
d
d d
d
8'Y<e
d o
8888
6iR88
x
lL
O
mm
OO
m
fp 1.
lV
Y
w1
$
O
M93
80
�'�S6
68
:S�m
YCI'^
n99e
mr88
R3S8
R
< <�
9pH
9F�3
d mRm
Q �
H
�24rz
9
sag
RR
2Rm6
$m��
86m88
$��08
898R
8536
8SO8�
:8R
N of
N N
Y
N
R 0
YS
O Yf
(V
ai O
0 ad
4D m
M
Y
W ry
N 3
tG
O IG
2
b
aN�B
8955
B�Ze
8A�8
385{d
8 --
:8e
89�F3
8�n8
SS6m
8:855
Small
d
G
N lV
>
8 &83
Ness
�m:x
N
aaA
�&8$
a8m�
m y
8ss3
�N
8 m8
6a8�
8$ro88sm
3�$N
s
y
5888
=
N
N
N m
N
14
14
� �
Y ^gym
�0000
8888
ss
0
X888
6
0 0
0
0 0
0 0
0
0 0
0
0 0
0 0
0
0 o
a
o 0
0 0
0
0 0
0
0 o
m o
0
0 0
0
0 0
8-; 8
0 0
U
ul
RpAR
d d
d d
asap
d
o
�R88
d d
d 6
3�SR9
d
d d
d
RRBN
o o
8RH8
o
o o
o
mSS°
d d
QBSS
d
d d
o
S89R
d
8ffi9m
d
d
3686
d d
d o
8808
d
d d
d
03808
a`
83
5
d d
X38
mmWS
8$SR
d
o
9883
d d
o
6996
14Y^s^
1414
A888
R8�
6RF
mBR�S
:80�
86
�
gU
2
nn
8888
����
5
�53�
���
����
xasa3x
sia^nw^
x53x53
>z
�zz
xxaa
5888
8888
t
m 888
B��Pt
SS88
RRm6
'ARAA
8888
8888
19'888
8333
8988
8888
8888
88m6
U
f
8889
$8Re
S8R9
88R3
S8
R9
S8R9
R98R
R9SR
R9SR
mRRm
a`
c
xa
��
gag
Fa
�a
xs
�sa�
�a
�s
rc
rc z
m N
& &
m N
&
N
& &
N N
&
.
& &
m m
& F.
m m
&
....
z &
&
& &
m m
& &
m m
&
m
rc E
...
&
c rc
m m
a C.-own
m
�n �'
m m
rc ¢
m m
¢
m
¢ rc
m m
z
m
a a
m m
¢ a
m m
m
a a
m m
a
m
¢ ¢
m m
rc z
m m
K
5555
5555
5555
5555
5555
5555
5555
5555
5555
5555
5555
5555
5555

•
•
•
sass
x888
g8ss
sass
ssao
sass
asss
r
4 9
4 4
�o t°
o$$d
So8°
s5o$
8060
d m
o8
N
mAa
83rD
^o
o5oe
d
0 0
A�7N
d 0
0
BFmm
588°
d
d o
518�3�i
0 0
� v
8 ^008
d6
866dd
'o"d$no
d
o
d d
0ddd
o8�ry
8888
s5oa
;A
RRf
58��
SeSe
U
N v
o
o
o d
o
d d
o
d
$oo$
q
RR5
s88d
ro
O
0000
O
8565
���
8000
m
88'�
o8
z'
G
000$
RBHR
b
u
d o
N f
o
d
d
o
d d
d o
d
d
d
r=
3
a° .J
858E
?Sv"38
Sa�R
80$8
8000
U �
a
a
o
Is
d cS
d
d 6
6 d
o
6
14
vi c
do
dddo
d m
U
u
0m�m
d d
RiBRR
°��R
g88�
d
o
�8
8858
RVA�
d
d
88
°°
d d
�pRn
mRR2
d o
58C2
d
d o
�
o�RR
o
d o
r8m8
8d
2$$�I
$888
8���
68548
n °88
a s
R
°v as
v88
8w'�`�
��SSA
�8'd<n
nm
g
g
888
8au"i
g'i
8a'�
'SAS
mS�y88
nbS
'�rS
�m
a�
unitRroOa�
rONwi�,
m
a�8s
m�vCi<
I��rIR�
�imR
;
�°sFi
I:�mQ�Qi
a$�tVY
n�$t��1iV�
oroba
���A
C
N
f
h
fri
W
�i b
O N
S n
3S
n
NnR
m
BO1
i
}�
NY
rtin
n
5
Y$
8&87
.Nd0
-o
88
F �
1
1-4
d
d d
d
d
8B8Fy
ty8
°8
83
8�mm
5888
��
�5
5 ^88�
888
5538
a
°n °ry
�8R
^<
na
°nRg3
WOLF
c
o
d
N m
d
N
N
ry N
d
d
ri N
U
7
g8
°88Q0RS
�0
1181
m_���gVS`�Qn,
gg58_jQ���
111;
°sV{
_�$8x_
�8
8_�n
����5_m_,$9,�
18
gm8�
y
888zS
o
d d
8888
SH9
8
$$
8611
�b�b
88
8
8888
8588
V,.
ui
d
d o
d
d o
d
a
d
o
o8m
'd
-R
S --
-
8-'B-
-8
--
d
cSd6
d'
and
^a, 3a
8
°nn8
��88
35
no
vi
f�'d3
1 °n
O
�
---
d
d
¢C
n8O
r8pp
NNNN°N
N
N �
s
nBS
�G$n
R�68
nRnB
$88�
N N
5833$
BmiBuS
N
H 6
anma8
N m
B�Sg
E
U =
i
_
"
��
8888
mmmm
8888
8888
8888
8$$8
n
^gym
8888
8888
8888
8888
8888
w
U C
$R$
AMU
RmRS
Rm85
m&3535
AAAA
RRmR
RRRR
RRRR
BeRP
4 nRR
94
49
A A
A R
88
mRAM
°8
R$8$
2$8$
288$
R$8$
R�28$
R�$$
R°8$
2 °8$
SA
°
<,
S8
°.
<,R
°.
;,888
99
s
R -
sR
R
°SR
8 0
5R
A
S �i
A68
m
BS�i$
0
N
2
E
E E
E
E E
E E
f
?
f
f
f f
f <
m
m Itl
m
N
m
N
m m
b
61
m m
m
m m
m` m`
m
m m
m
m 61
m m
5555
5555
5555
5555
5555
5555
5555
5555
5555
���
�_��
_��_
=��f

�
�
E
E
�
f
@nqk
TRl�
!f
�
k�
f =
§n°
�
:� :
#a¥
f
# ■P
!
}�
m
#m@
!@q@
kk
!
2a
n
)
;q
■;
.
©Rq
;at@
| ¥!«
#&
§k2q
m*&;
-
kq#
;lqR
@kqm
_
!;,
9km,
,-
R■q!
„
!
r!§e
2$[!
2 ■■�
«[)§§k
§
§|q
8888
|
!!!S
!!!£
15!§
�«
!
!
15!!
§!n!
B!!5
!£
!
; @
■@
®;;;
¥ ##m
!`
Bmam
9.8.8.8
B■■a
|
!
�
8888
kaa,
2■2,
a
||
|■
|||■
||||
\k

•
•
•
x
c
0
a�
w
F-
c
0
a�
w
F
c
0
a�
w
-AS medal from Aurodeslkl River and Food An "h , Moduk 2014 M. C..M model 2202014
RS =92
Legend
—R—
WS 1 00y
WS 50yr
WS 10yr
WS 2yr
Ground
♦ a�
Ineff w
•
Bank Sta
0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000
Station (ft)
HE AS —1 ham AuwdesAtl River.. Fkod Analyse Module 2014 Pkn: CurteM model 2/162014
RS =90
Legend
WS t 00yr
WS 50yr
WS 10yr
WS 2yr
� o
Ground m
• a2
Bank Sta w
0 200 400 600 800 10001200140016001800
Station (ft)
HEG A6 model from AMO ,W River and Food Am", Module 2014 Plan: CurteM medal 21262014
RS =95
Legend
WS 01 0 ry
WS r50y
WS 10yr
WS 2yr c
- L3
Ground m
• m
j Bank Sta w
0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000
Station (ft)
HEC42AS model from AuMd . River and Flood A-F m Module 2014 Plan. C-1 modal 21262014
RS =91
Legend
WS 100yr
WS 50yr
WS 10yr
WS 2yr
■
Ground
•
Bank Sta
0 200 400 600 800 10001200140016001800
Station (ft)
HEGRAS model fmm Auto .W R'-1 and Fkod Analysis Module 2014 PMn: Current medal 21262014
RS = 89
Legend
WS 1 00y
WS 50yr
WS 10yr
WS 2yr
Ground
•
Bank Sta
0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600
Station (ft)
HEGRAS model from Aurod "River a,d Fkod Analysis Module 2014 PW Currant model 2/262014
RS =94
Legend
WS 01 0 ry
WS 50yr
WS 10yr
WS 2yr
t
Ground
•
Bank Sta
0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000
Station (ft)

0
•
•
a
cu
a�
w
z
c
0
m
a�
w
c
0
m
a>>
w
HEGRAS motel from Autodeakal River and — Anafysie —a 2014 Pb, Conant model 2!16/[014
RS =93
Legend
WS 1 00y
WS 50yr
WS 10yr
WS 2yr
Ground
• A
Bank Sta w
0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000
Station (ft)
HEGRAS model ham Autotl . River and Food Ar.W. M W 2014 Plan: Cunem model M-014
RS = 104
Legend
WS 1 00y
WS 50yr
WS 1 Oyr
WS 2yr c
r_ o
Ground 6
Bank Sta w
0 50 100 150 200 250 300
Station (ft)
HEGRAS m M hom Auld ,W River aiM — Anaryela Module 2014 Plan: C —m 22&2014
RS = 102
0 50 100 150 200 250 30
Station (ft)
HEGRAS modal6am Autod W River a,d P W Analysis Module 2014 Plan: Current model 2,262014
RS = 105
Legend
WS 100yr
WS 50yr
WS 1 Oyr
WS 2yr
Ground
•
Bank Sta
0 50 100 150 200 250 300
Station (ft)
HEGRAS model from Autotl— R—r and %.d An," Module 2014 Plan: Current model 2262014
RS = 103
Legend
WS 50yr
WS 1 00y
WS 1 Oyr
WS 2yr
Ground
•
Bank Sta
0 50 100 150 200 250 300
Station (ft)
HEGRAS model— A— River and Mb Analpia Makb 2014 Ran:CufaMn 2282014
RS = 101
Legend
40.0
WS 1 00y
39.5
WS 50yr
+
39.0
WS 10yr
WS 2yr
38.5
Ground
m
•
m
38.0
Bank Sta
w
37.5
37.0
36.5
0
0
50 100 150 200 250
Station (ft)
Legend
WS 50yr
WS 10yr
WS 100yr
WS 2yr
■
Ground
•
Bank Sta

U
lr �J
u
Z
c
0
v
w
F
0
m
iv
w
N
0
0
w
HEC AS motel ftom AUrodesk: Rlver— FWd AnI,, Wduk]014 Plan CUneiRmodel 21262014
RS = 100
Legend
WS 100yr
WS 50yr
WS 10yr
WS 2yr
Ground
Bank Sta w
0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180
Station (ft)
HEG AS model ftom Autod W River arM Fkod An 1ty Module 2014 %en'. Cunem model 2262014
RS = 202
44.066 ", a � .066
5 Legend
WS 100yr
WS 50yr
WS 10yr
WS 2yr
Ground Z6
Bank Sta w
0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350
Station (ft)
HEC4W mood (mm AU%dAAW RKW end Flmd MAIM 4odN 2014 Plan: Curare modal X2&2014
RS = 200
0 50 100 150 200 250
Station (ft)
Legend
ka---
WS 100yr
WS 50yr
WS 10yr
WS 2yr
- o
Ground �m
• a�
Bank Sta w
HEGRA6modelftom AulodeekSRMr MIFIo AmAMMMUA2014 PI -Comm MWAI 2284014
RS = 203
Legend
�I
WS 100yr
WS 50yr
WS 10yr
WS 2yr
Ground
Bank Sta
0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350
Station (ft)
HE— model — AUWeek® RMr end FAM A Vy Aloduk 2014 PIen:CinminctlM X182014
RS = 201
Legend
WS 100yr00yr
WS 50yr
WS 10yr
WS 2yr
Ground
•
Bank Sta
0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350
Station (ft)
HEGR S model Imm Autodeok® Riwr aM Fl W Arelpie Module 2014 Plea: Curare n." X182014
RS = 304
0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400
Station (ft)
Legend
WS 100yr
WS 50yr
WS 10yr
WS 2yr
■
Ground
•
Bank Sta

•
•
•
c
0
a�
w
c
0
a�
w
c
0
a�
w
HEGRAS model hom Autode River aM Fkad Analysis Module 2014 Plan'. C.— model 2262014
RS = 303
Legend
WS —�-
WS r50y
WS 10yr
WS 2yr
t o
Ground i
• a�
Bank Sta W
0 50 100 150 200 250 300
Station (ft)
HEGRAS model hom Auto ,W River aM Fkod A.tysm Maduk 2014 Pkn: Curtent model 2/2&2014
RS = 301
Legend
WS 100yr
WS 50yr
WS 10yr
WS 2yr c
� o
Ground
• a�
Bank Sta w
0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350
Station (ft)
HEGRAS model hom Autod W River aM Fkod A.N- Maduk 2014 Plan. CurteM model 2262014
RS = 403
0 50 100 150 200 250 300
Station (ft)
Legend
WS 50yr
--H--
WS 100yr
+ I
WS 10yr
WS 2yr
t o
Ground
• a2
Bank Sta w
HEGRAS model from Autod — River and Fkod Aneky., Moduk 2014 Plan Current model 31362014
RS = 302
Legend
WS 01 0 ry
WS 50yr
WS 10yr
WS 2yr
Ground
•
Bank Sta
0 50 100 150 200 250 300
Station (ft)
HEGRAS model from AutodeekD River a,d Fkod Anatyaia Module Ml Plan'. Cunnl model 2/262014
RS = 404
Legend
WS 50yr
WS 100yr
WS 10yr
WS 2yr
Ground
•
Bank Sta
0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350
Station (ft)
HEGRAS model fmm Aukde W RMr and Fkad M.", Module 2014 Ran: Curets model 212&2014
RS = 402
0 50 100 150 200 250 300
Station (ft)
Legend
WS 50yr
—H—
WS 100yr
WS 10yr
WS 2yr
t i
Ground
Bank Sta
•

•
rI
•
c
0
w
c
0
w
r
c
0
m
w
HEC -RAS -1 hom AUtOdesA: River — Fbotl Analysis Module 2014 %en'. C. —model 220.2014
RS = 401
42 < 066 - O � .066
5 Legend
WS 50yr
WS 100yr
WS 1 Oyr
WS 2yr
Ground
Bank Sta w
0 100 200 300 400 500
Station (ft)
H—AS .&I from Auk"sAt River aiM fbed A-— Moduk 2014 Pkn. Cu— model 22012014
RS = 502
Legend
WS 100yr
WS 50yr
WS 1 Oyr
x
WS 2yr
-- S
Ground
• 0)
Bank Sta w
0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700
Station (ft)
HE S mdd hom Auk ,W Rim aM Fbotl Arwbp Mod" 2014 Pbn: Q m W MOM
RS = 500
0 100 200 300 400 500 600
Station (ft)
Legend
WS 100yr
—r—
WS 50yr
WS 10yr
WS 2yr
Ground
•
Bank Sta
HE— model lrom AUbdesA® River a.d flood Analysis MMd 2014 %an: C,.—dd 2202014
RS = 503
Legend
WS 50yr
WS 100yr
•
WS 10yr
WS 2yr
Ground
•
Ineff
•
Bank Sta
0 200 400 600 800
Station (ft)
HEGRAS model Rom A-M9 Rim antl Fbotl Anlrys Mod" 2014 Pbn: QaruO m 2/582014
RS = 501
0 100 200 300 400 500
Station (ft)
Legend
WS 100yr
WS 50yr
WS 10yr
WS 2yr
Ground
•
Bank Sta

•
•
•
O
O
Cl) LO
C
N
N
N
m O
m O
0
Q o co
E s
U
_ C
C �
m
L N
� N
U 0
o
@ o
LO
a N
N
N
� O �
O O
O
N U
N C
_T N
c
C N
Q C
0 L
O U
O c
LL O m
a � �
C
(0
Y
cn
O o
O E 1
CD
Q
E
O 3
o
U
� C
OC m
C m
O
N �
Q O
U
W
2
V N O T 00 (D V N
M M Cl) N N N N
(u) u011eAO13
7� m '. m
O
O
Cl) LO
C
N
N
N
m O
m O
0
Q o co
E s
U
_ C
C �
m
L N
� N
U 0
o
@ o
LO
a N
N
N
� O �
O O
O
N U
N C
_T N
c
C N
Q C
0 L
O U
O c
LL O m
a � �
C
(0
Y
cn
O o
O E 1
CD
Q
E
O 3
o
U
� C
OC m
C m
O
N �
Q O
U
W
2
V N O T 00 (D V N
M M Cl) N N N N
(u) u011eAO13

d O LO O N 7 m m
I O` O
CD
O
r
O
N
CO
N
N
0
C)
0
70
O
E
C
U
c
co
0
d
LO
0
N
N
O
00
v
Z
N
U
C
N
(O
C
Q
C
C
O
U)
O
F
U
LL
:
0
c
O
0
co
m
O
(o
ry
Y
N
_0
O
G
O
N
Q
E
O
w
N
0
O
E
U
o
Q
o
ry
U
w
2
_
CD
c} �
CO M (O
f`7
o
co
co
(y) UOpenal3

11
•
T
m i m
3
3
�
3
� �O ��
0
LO
0
N
O
N
N
0
�
o
a
O
E
C
N
U
c
M
0
a
Lo
N
r
O
N
N
O
o
N
U
In
C
N
(Q
21
In
(0
N
0
C
Q
W
In
Z
-0
F
=
O
U
LL
o
c
�n
co
�
c
co
N
O
p
Q
E
O
N
O
E
U)
o
ry
U
W
' _
O O u7
O u�
O O
o
m M M M
M co Cl)
Cl) l' c�'7 co
(14) UOilenal3
T
m i m
3
3
�
3
� �O ��

•
•
•
0 cl
to cj co CO
A
Im 0
LS
lk
Cl)
0
CN
(D
0
-0
0
E
Cc
-0
U�
cli
CD
C14
N
0
-0
CD
2
C\j
(n
.0
�
2:1
co
<
0
D
0
O
U-
0
LO
m
CD
<
E
0
70
0
E
C/)
C:)
LO
W
r
CD V�
cm�
00 r- co
(D LO LO
co m Cl) m
m Cl) n co
m
(11) LIO]JeA@J�j

• CO
41 o
•
0
LO
T
Cl)
,m
O
N
O
N
N
0
o
4l
a
O
E
C
N
7
U
c
O
O
a
N
O
N
N
3
O
C)
N C
cr
c
.N
m
2
m
(6 v
C
Q U
O
O
U
�
O c
�n m
c
(0
N
Y
M
N
O
O
7
Q
O
L
7
O
'E^
U)
O
�
U
w
T _T
�
Cl)
Cl) co M co
O
m
M
(u) uoijena13
T
N
,m
° O

U
•
0
I
CN C CO
tm
Lo
10 io
2
CD
CD
0
N
0—
0
O
co
Z
C)
CD
C
(0
co
a
ca
LL-
LO
X
CO
cc
C:
cu
C
C)
LL
0
7@
CD
-0
N
CO
U)
LU
U') C� . . . . C,4 . . . C)
co CID ce) Cl) co
(4) uoijeAGJ--�
I