Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout20140189 Ver 1_401 Application_20180218rE�< C, vlllt:� Y Office Use Only: Corps action ID no. DWQ project no. Form Version 1.4 January 2009 Page 1 of 10 PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009 Pre -Construction Notification (PCN) Form A. Applicant Information 1. Processing 1 a. Type(s) of approval sought from the Corps: ❑X Section 404 Permit ❑ Section 10 Permit 1 b. Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number: 27 or General Permit (GP) number: 3885 1c. Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps? ® Yes ❑ No 1 d. Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply): NX 401 Water Quality Certification — Regular ❑ Non -404 Jurisdictional General Permit ❑ 401 Water Quality Certification — Express ❑ Riparian Buffer Authorization 1 e. Is this notification solely for the record because written approval is not required? For the record only for DWQ 401 Certification: ❑ Yes ❑X No For the record only for Corps Permit: ❑ Yes ❑X No 1f. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for mitigation of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program. ❑ Yes ❑X No 1 g. Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties. If yes, answer 1 h below. ❑ Yes NX No 1 h. Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)? ❑ Yes ❑X No 2. Project Information 2a. Name of project: Arrington Bridge III Wetland Mitigation Bank 2b. County: Wayne 2c. Nearest municipality / town: Goldsboro, NC 2d. Subdivision name: 2e. NCDOT only, T.I.P. or state project no: 3. Owner Information 3a. Name(s) on Recorded Deed: See Attached Supplemental Information 3b. Deed Book and Page No. 3c. Responsible Party (for LLC if applicable): 3d. Street address: 3e. City, state, zip: 3f. Telephone no.: 3g. Fax no.: 3h. Email address: Page 1 of 10 PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009 4. Applicant Information (if different from owner) 4a. Applicant is: ❑ Agent ❑ Other, specify: 4b. Name: Daniel Ingram 4c. Business name (if applicable): Resource Environmental Solutions 4d. Street address: 302 Jefferson St., Suite 110 4e. City, state, zip: Raleigh, NC 27605 4f. Telephone no.: 919-622-3845 4g. Fax no.: 4h. Email address: dingram@res.us 5. Agent/Consultant Information (if applicable) 5a. Name: 5b. Business name (if applicable): 5c. Street address: 5d. City, state, zip: 5e. Telephone no.: 5f. Fax no.: 5g. Email address: Page 2 of 10 B. Project Information and Prior Project History 1. Property Identification 1a. Property identification no. (tax PIN or parcel ID): See supplemental information 1 b. Site coordinates (in decimal degrees): Latitude: 35.342895 Longitude: -78.009907 1 c. Property size: 57.4 acres 2. Surface Waters 2a. Name of nearest body of water to proposed project: Neuse River 2b. Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water: C NSW 2c. River basin: 03020201200040 3. Project Description 3a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this application: See attached supplemental information 3b. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property: 12.11 3c. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property: 327 3d. Explain the purpose of the proposed project: See attached supplemental information 3e. See Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used: attached supplemental information 4. Jurisdictional Determinations 4a. Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property / project (includingall prior phases)in the past? ❑X Yes ❑ No ❑ Unknown Comments: 4b. If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination, what type of determination was made? ❑X Preliminary ❑ Final 4c. If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas? Name (if known): George Lankford Agency/Consultant Company: WK Dickson Other: 4d. If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation. JD request was sent to Emily Greer on 11 September 2015. 5. Project History 5a. Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for this project (including all prior phases) in the past? Yes X❑ ❑ No ❑ Unknown 5b. If yes, explain in detail according to "help file" instructions. 6. Future Project Plans 6a. Is this a phased project? ❑ Yes ❑X No 6b. If yes, explain. Page 3 of 10 PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009 C. Proposed Impacts Inventory 1. Impacts Summary 1 a. Which sections were completed below for your project (check all that apply): ❑ Wetlands ❑ Streams — tributaries ❑ Buffers ❑X Open Waters ❑ Pond Construction 2. Wetland Impacts If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted. 2a. Wetland impact number Permanent (P) or Temporary T 2b. Type of impact 2c. Type of wetland 2d. Forested 2e. Type of jurisdiction Corps (404,10) or DWQ (401, other) 2f. Area of impact (acres) W1 - Choose one Choose one Yes/No - W2 - Choose one Choose one Yes/No W3 - Choose one Choose one Yes/No W4 - Choose one Choose one Yes/No W5 - Choose one Choose one Yes/No W6 - Choose one Choose one Yes/No 2g. Total Wetland Impacts: 2h. Comments: 3. Stream Impacts If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this question for all stream sites impacted. 3a. Stream impact number Permanent (P) or Temporary (T) 3b. Type of impact 3c. Stream name 3d. Perennial (PER) or intermittent (INT)? 3e. Type of jurisdiction 3f. Average stream width (feet) 3g. Impact length (linear feet) S1 Choose one - S2 - Choose one - S3 - Choose one - S4 - Choose one - S5 - Choose one - S6 - Choose one - 3h. Total stream and tributary impacts 3i. Comments: Page 4 of 10 PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009 4. Open Water Impacts If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of the U.S. then indivi ually list all open water impacts below. 4a. Open water impact number Permanent (P) or Temporary T 4b. Name of waterbody (if applicable) 4c. Type of impact 4d. Waterbody type 4e. Area of impact (acres) 01 P Fill Pond 0.26 O2 - Choose one Choose 03 - Choose one Choose 04 - Choose one Choose 4f. Total open water impacts 0.26 4g. Comments: Pond wiii be backtined with e adjacent spoil pie and planted with trees and a -permanent seed mix. Although this area-WiTbe restored to a wetland, it will receive Enhancement credits because the pond is already a jurisdictional feature. 5. Pond or Lake Construction If pond or lake construction proposed, the complete the chart below. 5a. Pond ID number 5b. Proposed use or purpose of pond 5c. Wetland Impacts (acres) 5d. Stream Impacts (feet) 5e. Upland (acres) Flooded Filled Excavated Flooded Filled Excavated P1 Choose one P2 Choose one 5f. Total: 5g. Comments: 5h. Is a dam high hazard permit required? ❑ Yes ❑ No If yes, permit ID no: 5i. Expected pond surface area (acres): 5j. Size of pond watershed (acres): 5k. Method of construction: 6. Buffer Impacts (for DWQ) If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below. If yes, then individually list all buffer impacts below. If any impacts require mitigation, then you MUST fill out Section D of this form. 6a. Project is in which protected basin? ❑ Neuse ❑ Tar -Pamlico ❑ Catawba ❑ Randleman ❑ Other: 6b. Buffer Impact number - Permanent (P) or Temporary T 6c. Reason for impact 6d. Stream name 6e. Buffer mitigation required? 6f. Zone 1 impact (square feet) 6g. Zone 2 impact (square feet B1 Yes/No B2 Yes/No B3 Yes/No B4 - Yes/No B5 - Yes/No B6 - Yes/No 6h. Total Buffer Impacts: 6i. Comments: Page 5 of 10 D. Impact Justification and Mitigation 1. Avoidance and Minimization 1a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project. See attached supplemental information 1 b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques. See attached supplemental information 2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State 2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State? ❑ Yes ❑X No 2b. If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply): ❑ DWQ ❑ Corps 2c. If yes, which mitigation option will be used for this project? ❑ Mitigation bank El Payment to in -lieu fee program ❑ Permittee Responsible Mitigation 3. Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank 3a. Name of Mitigation Bank: 3b. Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter) Type: Choose one Type: Choose one Type: Choose one Quantity: Quantity: Quantity: 3c. Comments: 4. Complete if Making a Payment to In -lieu Fee Program 4a. Approval letter from in -lieu fee program is attached. ❑ Yes 4b. Stream mitigation requested: linear feet 4c. If using stream mitigation, stream temperature: Choose one 4d. Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only): square feet 4e. Riparian wetland mitigation requested: acres 4f. Non -riparian wetland mitigation requested: acres 4g. Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested: acres 4h. Comments: 5. Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan 5a. If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan. Page 6 of 10 PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009 6. Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) — required by DWQ 6a. Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires ❑ Yes ❑X No buffer mitigation? 6b. If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation. Calculate the amount of mitigation required. 6c. 6d. 6e. Zone Reason for impact Total impact Multiplier Required mitigation (square feet) (square feet) Zone 1 3 (2 for Catawba) Zone 2 1.5 6f. Total buffer mitigation required: 6g. If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e.g., payment to private mitigation bank, permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in -lieu fee fund). 6h. Comments: Page 7 of 10 E. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ) 1. Diffuse Flow Plan 1 a. Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified ❑X Yes ❑ No within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules? 1 b. If yes, then is a diffuse flow plan included? If no, explain why. No changes in impervious acreage proposed. ❑ Yes ❑X No 2. Stormwater Management Plan 2a. What is the overall percent imperviousness of this project? 0 2b. Does this project require a Stormwater Management Plan? ❑ Yes 0 No 2c. If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why: Wetland restoration project- no changes in impervious acreage proposed. 2d. If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan, then provide a brief, narrative description of the plan: 2e. Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan? 3. Certified Local Government Stormwater Review 3a. In which localgovernment's jurisdiction is thisproject? ❑ Phase II ❑ NSW 3b. Which of the following locally -implemented stormwater management programs ❑ USMP apply (check all that apply): ❑ Water Supply Watershed ❑ Other: 3c. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been ❑ Yes ❑X No attached? 4. DWQ Stormwater Program Review ❑Coastal counties ❑ HQW 4a. Which of the following state -implemented stormwater management programs apply ❑ORW (check all that apply): ❑Session Law 2006-246 ❑ Other: 4b. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been ❑ Yes 0 No attached? 5. DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review 5a. Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements? ❑ Yes ❑ No 5b. Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met? ❑ Yes ❑ No Page 8 of 10 PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009 F. Supplementary Information 1. Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement) 1 a. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the ❑ Yes X❑ No use of public (federal/state) land? 1 b. If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State ❑ Yes ❑ No (North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)? 1 c. If you answered "yes" to the above, has the document review been finalized by the State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval ❑ Yes ❑ No letter.) Comments: 2. Violations (DWQ Requirement) 2a. Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards, ❑ Yes ❑X No or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)? 2b. Is this an after -the -fact permit application? ® Yes ❑ No 2c. If you answered "yes" to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s): Original DWR PCN 401 application and payment was made in November 2015, following DWR review and approval of the Final Mitigation Plan. PCN was not processed (or received?) and the payment was returned to RES Baton Rouge accounting office. Local RES PM waited 60+ days for receipt of 401 Certification, then proceeded to construction under the assumption the processing window had expired and the project was approved. RES was subsequently notified that the 401 Certification was never issued and a re-application was required. 3. Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement) 3a. Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in ❑ Yes ❑X No additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality? 3b. If you answered "yes" to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the most recent DWQ policy. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description. This is a wetland restoration site that will be protected through a conservation easement and will not facilitate or deter surrounding development. 4. Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement) 4a. Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non -discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility. N/A Page 9 of 10 PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009 5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement) 5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or ❑ Yes 0 No habitat? 5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act 0 Yes ❑ No impacts? 5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted. Raleigh 5d. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical Habitat? USFWS Endangered Species database;NC Natural Heritage Program GIS database 6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement) 6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat? ❑ Yes ❑X No 61b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat? NOAA Fisheries Essential Fish Habitat Mapper 7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement) 7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation ❑ Yes 0 No status (e.g., National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in North Carolina history and archaeology)? 7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources? Written communication with NC State Historic Preservation Office 8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement) 8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA -designated 100 -year floodplain? ❑X Yes ❑ No 8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements: The Arrington Bridge III Site is located within the FEMA 100 -year Floodplain of the Neuse River, and the southeast corner of the project is located within the within the FEMA -regulated floodway. Minor grading/earthwork is currently proposed within the floodway- It is anticipated that a no -rise will meet the project requirements and the necessary report and documentation will be submitted to the City of Goldsboro. 8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination? FEMA floodplain mapping FIRM Panels: http://fris.nc.gov/ pplic Agent's Printed Name Date ApplicanVAgent's Signature (Agent's signatu is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant isprovided.) Page 10 of 10 PCN Narrative Arrington Bridge III Wetland Mitigation Project Nationwide Permit 27 Pre -Construction Notification Name and address of the Applicant: Resource Environmental Solutions c/o Daniel Ingram 302 Jefferson Street, Suite 110 Raleigh, NC 27605 PCN Narrative- Arrington Bridge III Mitigation Project A. Applicant Information 3. Owner Information Site Deed Book Acreage Landowner PIN County Protection and Page Protected Instrument Number Parcel A JBA Properties LLC 2598318336 Wayne 1982@313 45.30 Parcel B JBA Properties II LLC 2597698334 Wayne 2783@878 12.10 B. Proiect Information and Prior Proiect History la. Property Identification no. (tax Pin or Parcel ID): See table owner information above. 3a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the Proiect at the time of this application: The Arrington Bridge III Wetland Mitigation Project is located on a 57.40 acre site three miles southwest of Goldsboro in western Wayne County, NC. One unnamed channelized drainage feature that traverses the site exhibits diminished habitat value as a result of past and on-going agricultural activities. The project is located within the Neuse River Basin (8 -digit USGS HUC 03020201, 14 -digit USGS HUC 03020201200040, NC DWQ 03-04-12) (Figure 2).The site was identified by EBX-Neuse I, LLC as having potential to help meet the compensatory mitigation requirements for wetland impacts in hydrologic unit 03020201 of the Neuse River Basin. Land use immediately surrounding the project includes pasture, surface mining, industrial, and forestry. Numerous old borrow pits, spoil, and fill areas adjacent to the restoration area are evidence of past sand mining operations. A small unnamed tributary enters the project from uplands to the north (Arrington Bridge I and II), flowing through a wooded buffer along the base of the terrace. The channel has been dredged and channelized throughout most of the project. Soil investigations show that much of the low-lying landscape exhibits hydric characteristics and a shallow seasonal high water table. The site is located on a large inside meander of the Neuse River. There are three community types present within the project area: pasture, forest, and development. The restoration area is primarily pasture and forest and the enhancement areas are Cypress -Gum forests with shallow pools and marsh throughout. A detailed wetland delineation was performed in July 2013. Jurisdictional wetlands are present in the enhancement area north of the central channel and within a planted stand of cypress trees to the west of the main ditch feature. The wetlands on the Site are divided between heavily disturbed and functional. The disturbed wetlands are impacted by surface mining and agricultural practices. These areas have altered drainage patterns, disturbed soils, and are reduced in area due to drainage. 3d. Explain the purpose of the proposed Proiect: The objective for this restoration project is to restore a continuous bottomland wetland system and enhance the hydrology of existing wetlands. The design will be based on reference conditions, USACE guidance (USACE, 2005), and criteria that are developed during this project to achieve success. The primary wetland restoration activities will include: 0 The backfilling and stabilizing of the main canal and existing side ditches; PCN Narrative- Arrington Bridge III Mitigation Project • The fill material on one of the access roads will be removed and stabilized to restore the natural flow pattern; • the pond will be backfilled with the adjacent spoil pile; • Areas of cut and fill will be re -graded to create a continuous bottomland wetland system. • Existing wetland areas will be enhanced through invasive species control, hydrology improvements, and habitat connectivity. 3e. Describe the overall proiect in detail, including the type ofeguipment to be used: The Arrington Bridge III Wetland Mitigation project will provide 32.51 wetland mitigation units through a combination of Wetland Restoration and two levels of Wetland Enhancement. The existing pasture areas on the Site will be treated with Wetland Restoration at a credit ratio of 1:1. Wetland Restoration activities will include: plugging the main channel and side ditches, removing fill, and regrading the area to reconstruct historical contours. A credit ratio of 3:1 is proposed for higher -uplift wetland enhancement areas, including a drained area of planted cypress, an excavated pond, and forested areas along the north side of the main ditch. A ratio of 5:1 is proposed for the lower -uplift wetland enhancement areas, which are primarily along the north side of the main ditch. Both levels of Wetland Enhancement will be treated by enhancing the hydrology and providing long-term protection. This will be accomplished by filling the ditches across the site to raise the water table and restore a more natural drainage pattern. Additionally, the pond will be backfilled with the adjacent spoil pile and planted with trees and a permanent seed mix. Although this area will be restored to a wetland, it will receive Enhancement credits at a ratio of 3:1 because the pond is already a jurisdictional feature. Plugging ditches and main channelized drainage feature Plugging of the main feature and side ditches will be accomplished through a combination of backfilling and the construction of ditch plugs throughout the easement area. Approximately 8,600 linear feet of open ditch will be backfilled within the easement boundary. Ditches will be filled, compacted, and graded to the adjacent floodplain elevation. Typical ditch plugs will be 20 feet wide and extend above the top of the ditch bank elevation a minimum of 6 inches. Plugs will be constructed of compacted fill placed in 12 -inch lifts with the upper 18 inches minimally compacted to allow for plant growth. Plugs are spaced such that successive plugs are no more than 6 inches in elevation below one another. At the point of departure from the conservation easement, a headwater -type channel will be graded to the existing ditch elevation. When possible, ditch plugs will be constructed using excavated material from the restoration and construction of wetland pools. Fill Removal, Pond Bac)�Cill, and regrading ofsite Disturbed soils underlain by hydric soils (as described in the soils report) will be graded to allow for a more natural hydrologic regime and function. Additionally, the fill material on the access roads will be removed to restore the natural flow pattern of the site. The proposed restoration site is very gently sloping (less than one percent) but does contain approximately 3 feet of elevation difference across the site. Several decades of agricultural management and mining operations has eliminated microtopography across the site. As outlined in the soils report (Appendix C), approximately 12.6 acres of the project area is described as disturbed soils having hydric indicators and lacking wetland hydrology. These include large areas in a lower landscape position located adjacent to visible borrow pits. The soils in these areas have variable textures that are exhibiting hydric indicators. All of this area is in pasture and currently grazed. One excavated pond will be backfilled with soil from the adjacent spoil pile. The filled pond will be considered enhancement due to the jurisdictional status of the existing open water habitat. The entire conservation easement will be disked to break up the plow layer, increase surface roughness, and promote infiltration. PCN Narrative- Arrington Bridge III Mitigation Project D. Impact Justification and Mid2ation la and Ib. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designinz proiect and through construction techniques: Both stream and wetland impacts were considered when designing the Arrington Bridge project. This project will restore and uplift the ecological quality of wetlands on site. Impacts are minimized using a staged construction approach. This approach allows minimization of the impact of each stage during the project construction. Additionally all work in wetlands will be conducted during dry conditions and/or with mats to protect soil structure. Efforts will be made to preserve individual high value trees located within the restoration and enhancement area. 0 .."4P o � o O o a� 4Z Goldsboro o l Goldsboro ap ° 0 Q Arrington Bridge III Site op � O ° G ar- a o- - D ISM �{5 / Q Legend Streams - Proposed Easement Waterbody HUC 03020201200040 R �F kilo °YaI+A,- gh 12 x� r=frn Rr - fi�ymoL\ Jo hnsc'n F4 kr E.- - - o0 1 rmlj 11�.. ` I Sources: Esri, HERE, DeLorme, USGS, Intermaap,i'ncrementIftGorNUse NRCAN, Esri Japan, METH Esri China (Hong Kong�Es�i (Thailand he GI TomTom, Mapmylndia, © OpenStreetMap contributors, and tS GoMmu n ity Figure Resource Project Vicinity Map Environmental Arrington Bridge III Site Solutions 4 0 1 •NTSWMiles Scale: NTS �x hAn6iaiitM159 Goa -,k V Ail Dil Arrington Bridge I Mitigation Site Iota Arrington Bridge II - _ - # .k Mitigation Site pd • w' M 74 / IMP 9 �4, Arrington Bridge III McArfA- Proposed Mitigation Site - .. - - _ - MP Sat � Fara ■ fes' ' s F Source: Southeast Golds6oro,and'Southwest Goldsboro Quadrangles Copyri9, t:©:2013 National Geographice- ociety, i -cubed Figure 2. Resource USGS Topographic Map Proposed Easement Environmental Arrington Bridge III Site C Arrington Bridge I Solutions 0 1,000 2,000 4,000 Arrington Bridge 11 Feet 1 inch = 2,000 feet 9rr /'7 ✓r. AL..�. i Soil Symbol Name Soil Symbol Name Bp Borrow pit W Water Co Coxville loam WaB Wagram loamy sand, 0 - 6% slopes Jo Johns sandy loam We Weston loamy sand (Woodington) KaA Kalmia loamy sand, 0 - 2% slopes WhA Wickham loamy sand, 0 - 2% slopes KaB Kalmia loamy sand, 2 - 6% slopes WhB Wickham loamy sand, 2 - 6% slopes La Lakeland sand WkB2 Wickham sandy loam, 2 - 6% slopes, eroded Po Pantegoloam Source: NRCS Soil Data, Wayne County Figure 3. Roads Resource Soils Map Streams Environmental Arrington Bridge III Site Solutions 0 300 600 1,200 Proposed Easement Feet Wayne County Soils 1 inch = 600 feet m© rLi PUBH X0, , �j 4PN .r7 Fx PEM PF01A ............. Source: National Wetlands Figure 4. -Roads Resource NWI Map Streams Environmental Arrington Bridge III Site Solutions NWI Wetlands 0 300 600 1,200 Feet Proposed Easement 1 inch = 600 feet Existing Vegetation Conditions Target Community w m Absent CL rn LPresent rresent ivia No Fill M I -.,AM Figure 5. Roads Resource Existing Conditions Map Existing Ditch Environmental Arrington Bridge III Site Streams Solutions 0 300 600 1,200 Feet Proposed Easement 1 inch = 600 feet 0 Existing Wetlands Resource Environmental Solutions Figure 6. FEMA Map Arrington Bridge III Site 0 500 1,000 2,000 Feet 1 inch = 1,000 feet Roads Streams LJ Proposed Easement ® FEMA 100 -yr Floodplain ® FEMA 500 -yr Floodplain FEMA Floodway = nt°nlstl 1, `oo �1 tog CO y �� 9 a'ia J { Figure 7. Roads Resource LIDAR Map Environmental Arrington Bridge III Site Streams Solutions Proposed Easement 0 500 1,000 2,000 Feet Parcel Boundaries 1 inch = 1,000 feet e Bei ��NN XN e 30 �z t Vj Source: USGS 1950 Aerial PhotograpF u Figure 8. Resource 1950 Historical Conditions Environmental Arrington Bridge III Site Roads Solutions 0 500 1,000 2,000 Proposed Easement Feet 1 inch = 1,000 feet yF S •.4' yr. ` r. Flow Pattern k Fill pond with adjacent spoil pile r '�a 74 Remove fill k �4 from access roadiL4 Iwo O Log Grade Control Roads Existing Ditch — Stream - No Credit (327 LF) Wetland Enhancement 3:1 (5.8 Ac.) Wetland Enhancement 5:1 (6.1 Ac.) Wetland Restoration 1:1 (29.1Ac.) Proposed Easement Property Boundary Resource Environmental Solutions Y w \Ank .� .A1.�G�ii•'r-i.i,: -F.:i.�w�r:.. �`-L➢..a. — .i{ti���1. Figure 9. ti Conceptual Design Plan Arrington Bridge III Site 0 200 400 800 Feet 1 in= 400 ft WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region Project/Site: Arrington Bridge City/County: Wayne Sampling Date: July 8, 2013 Applicant/Owner: EBX State: NC Sampling Point: 200-H Investigator(s): G Lankford, B Hockett Section, Township, Range: Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Floodplain Local relief (concave, convex, none): concave -linear Slope (%): <1 Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P, MLRA 133A Lat: 35.3478360527 Long: -78.0158777364 Datum: Soil Map Unit Name: Kalmia loamy sand NWI classification: Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No ✓ (If no, explain in Remarks.) Are Vegetation ✓ Soil ✓ or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes _/ No Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes ✓ No Is the Sampled Area Hydric Soil Present? Yes ✓ No ✓ within a Wetland? Yes No Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No V( Remarks: Site is in active pasture. Ditching has increased runoff rate. Rainfall is above normal. HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required) Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply) _ Surface Soil Cracks (136) Surface Water (Al) Aquatic Fauna (1313) _ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138) High Water Table (A2) Marl Deposits (1315) (LRR U) _ Drainage Patterns (1310) Saturation (A3) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl) — Moss Trim Lines (1316) Water Marks (B1) _ Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3) _ Dry -Season Water Table (C2) Sediment Deposits (62) _ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) _ Crayfish Burrows (C8) Drift Deposits (133) _ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) _ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) Algal Mat or Crust (B4) _ Thin Muck Surface (C7) _ Geomorphic Position (D2) Iron Deposits (135) —Other (Explain in Remarks) _ Shallow Aquitard (D3) — Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137) _ FAC -Neutral Test (D5) Water -Stained Leaves (69) _ Sphagnum moss (D8) (LRR T, U) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes No ✓ Depth (inches): Water Table Present? Yes No ✓ Depth (inches): Saturation Present? Yes No ✓ Depth (inches): Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No includes capillary fringe) Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: Remarks: US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0 VEGETATION (Five Strata) — Use scientific names of plants. Sampling Point: 200-H Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below). Data point in pasture. Bare earth exposed from livestock impacts. US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0 Absolute Dominant Indicator Dominance Test worksheet: Tree Stratum (Plot size: 20 foot radius ) % Cover Species? Status Number of Dominant Species 1 Pinus taeda 15 Yes FAC That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 3 (A) 2. Total Number of Dominant 3• Species Across All Strata: 4 (B) 4. Percent of Dominant Species 5• That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 75 (A/B) 6. Prevalence Index worksheet: 15 = Total Cover 50% of total cover: 20% of total cover: Total % Cover of: Multiply by: Sapling Stratum (Plot size: ) OBL species x 1 = FACW species x 2 = 1 FAC species x 3 = 2 FACU species x 4 = 3 UPL species x 5 = 4 Column Totals: 0 (A) 0 (B) 5 6. Prevalence Index = B/A = 0 = Total Cover Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: 50% of total cover: 20% of total cover: ❑✓ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation Shrub Stratum (Plot size: ) ❑✓ 2 - Dominance Test is >50% 1 • ❑ 3 - Prevalence Index is <_3.0' 2• ❑ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain) 3. 4. 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must 5, be present, unless disturbed or problematic. 6. Definitions of Five Vegetation Strata: 0 = Total Cover Tree —Woody plants, excluding woody vines, 50% of total cover: 20% of total cover: approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and 3 in. Herb Stratum (Plot size: 20 foot radius ) (7.6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH). 1 Carex lurida 10 Yes OBL Sapling — Woody plants, excluding woody vines, 2 Rubus hispidus 10 Yes FACW approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less 3 Cynodon dactylon 10 Yes FACU than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH. q Juncus coriaceus 5 No FACW Shrub — Woody plants, excluding woody vines, 5 Polygonum pensylvanicum 5 No FACW approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) in height. 6. Herb — All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, including 7 herbaceous vines, regardless of size, and woody plants, except woody vines, less than approximately 8. 3 ft (1 m) in height. 9. Woody vine — All woody vines, regardless of height. 10. 11. 40 = Total Cover 50% of total cover: 20% of total cover: Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: ) 1. 2. 3. 4. 5• Hydrophytic 0 = Total Cover Vegetation n 50% of total cover: 20% of total cover: Present? Yes • No Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below). Data point in pasture. Bare earth exposed from livestock impacts. US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0 SOIL Sampling Point: 200-H Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features (inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type' Loc Texture Remarks 0-4 10YR 2/2 100 LS 4-9 10YR 3/3 80 10YR 3/6 20 C PL S 9-16 10YR 5/2 80 10YR 4/6 20 D PL SCL 16-22 10YR 6/1 60 10YR 5/8 10 C PL SC 'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix. Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3: Histosol (Al) _ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR S, T, U) _ 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR O) Histic Epipedon (A2) _ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T, U) _ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S) Black Histic (A3) _ Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR O) _ Reduced Vertic (F18) (outside MLRA 150A,B) Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) _ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) _ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P, S, T) Stratified Layers (A5) ✓ Depleted Matrix (F3) _ Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P, T, U) _ Redox Dark Surface (F6) (MLRA 153B) 5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U) _ Depleted Dark Surface (F7) _ Red Parent Material (TF2) Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U) _ Redox Depressions (F8) _ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T) _ Marl (F10) (LRR U) _ Other (Explain in Remarks) Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) _ Depleted Ochric (F11) (MLRA 151) Thick Dark Surface (Al2) _ Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR O, P, T) 3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A) _ Umbric Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U) wetland hydrology must be present, Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR O, S) _ Delta Ochric (F17) (MLRA 151) unless disturbed or problematic. Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) _ Reduced Vertic (F18) (MLRA 150A, 1508) Sandy Redox (S5) _ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A) Stripped Matrix (S6) _ Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA 149A, 153C, 153D) _ Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U) Restrictive Layer (if observed): Type: Depth Hydric Soil Present? Yes W1 No (inches): Remarks: US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0 WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region Project/Site: Arrington Bridge City/County: Wayne Sampling Date: July 8, 2013 Applicant/Owner: EBX State: NC Sampling Point: 201 Investigator(s): G Lankford, B Hockett Section, Township, Range: Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Floodplain Local relief (concave, convex, none): concave -linear Slope (oho): 1 Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P, MLRA 133A Lat: 35.3475530381 Long: -78.01578556 Datum: Soil Map Unit Name: Kalmia loamy sand NWI classification: No Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No ✓ (If no, explain in Remarks.) Are Vegetation ✓ Soil ✓ or Hydrology ✓ significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes _/ No Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes ✓ No Is the Sampled Area Hydric Soil Present? Yes No ✓ ✓ within a Wetland? Yes No Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No ✓ Remarks: Site is in active pasture. Rainfall is above normal. HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required) Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply) _ Surface Soil Cracks (136) Surface Water (Al) Aquatic Fauna (1313) _ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138) High Water Table (A2) Marl Deposits (1315) (LRR U) _ Drainage Patterns (1310) Saturation (A3) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl) — Moss Trim Lines (1316) Water Marks (B1) _ Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3) _ Dry -Season Water Table (C2) Sediment Deposits (62) _ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) _ Crayfish Burrows (C8) Drift Deposits (133) _ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) _ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) Algal Mat or Crust (B4) _ Thin Muck Surface (C7) _ Geomorphic Position (D2) Iron Deposits (135) —Other (Explain in Remarks) _ Shallow Aquitard (D3) — Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137) _ FAC -Neutral Test (D5) Water -Stained Leaves (69) _ Sphagnum moss (D8) (LRR T, U) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes No ✓ Depth (inches): Water Table Present? Yes No ✓ Depth (inches): Saturation Present? Yes No ✓ Depth (inches): Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No includes capillary fringe) Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: Remarks: US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0 VEGETATION (Five Strata) — Use scientific names of plants. Sampling Point: 201 Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below). Data point in pasture. Bare earth exposed from livestock impacts. US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0 Absolute Dominant Indicator Dominance Test worksheet: Tree Stratum (Plot size: 20 foot radius ) % Cover Species? Status Number of Dominant Species 1 Pinus taeda 15 Yes FAC That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 2 (A) 2. Total Number of Dominant 3• Species Across All Strata: 3 (B) 4. Percent of Dominant Species 5• That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 66 (A/B) 6. Prevalence Index worksheet: 15 = Total Cover 50% of total cover: 20% of total cover: Total % Cover of: Multiply by: Sapling Stratum (Plot size: ) OBL species x 1 = FACW species x 2 = 1 FAC species x 3 = 2 FACU species x 4 = 3 UPL species x 5 = 4 Column Totals: 0 (A) 0 (B) 5 6. Prevalence Index = B/A = 0 = Total Cover Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: 50% of total cover: 20% of total cover: ❑ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation Shrub Stratum (Plot size: ) ❑✓ 2 - Dominance Test is >50% 1 • ❑ 3 - Prevalence Index is <_3.0' 2. ❑ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain) 3. 4• 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must 5, be present, unless disturbed or problematic. 6. Definitions of Five Vegetation Strata: 0 = Total Cover Tree —Woody plants, excluding woody vines, 50% of total cover: 20% of total cover: approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and 3 in. Herb Stratum (Plot size: 20 foot radius ) (7.6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH). 1 Juncus coriaceus 25 Yes FACW Sapling — Woody plants, excluding woody vines, 2 Eupatorium capillifolium 20 Yes FACU approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less 3 Rubus hispidus 10 No FACW than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH. 4. Shrub — Woody plants, excluding woody vines, 5 approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) in height. 6. Herb — All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, including 7 herbaceous vines, regardless of size, and woody plants, except woody vines, less than approximately 8. 3 ft (1 m) in height. 9. Woody vine — All woody vines, regardless of height. 10. 11. 55 = Total Cover 50% of total cover: 20% of total cover: Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: ) 1 Campsis radicans 2 No FAC 2. 3. 4. 5• Hydrophytic 2 = Total Cover Vegetation n 50% of total cover: 20% of total cover: Present? Yes • No Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below). Data point in pasture. Bare earth exposed from livestock impacts. US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0 SOIL Sampling Point: 201 Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features (inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type' Loc Texture Remarks 0-4 10YR3/2 95 10YR 4/6 5 C PL LS 4-9 10YR 4/4 95 10YR 4/6 5 C M SL 9-14 10YR 5/6 65 10YR 6/1 45 D M SL 14-20 10YR 6/1 75 10YR 5/6 20 C M Sic -- -- -- 10YR 4/6 5 C M -- 'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix. Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3: Histosol (Al) _ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR S, T, U) _ 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR O) Histic Epipedon (A2) _ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T, U) _ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S) Black Histic (A3) _ Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR O) _ Reduced Vertic (F18) (outside MLRA 150A,B) Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) _ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) _ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P, S, T) Stratified Layers (A5) _ Depleted Matrix (F3) _ Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P, T, U) _ Redox Dark Surface (F6) (MLRA 153B) 5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U) _ Depleted Dark Surface (F7) _ Red Parent Material (TF2) Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U) _ Redox Depressions (F8) _ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T) _ Marl (F10) (LRR U) _ Other (Explain in Remarks) Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) _ Depleted Ochric (F11) (MLRA 151) Thick Dark Surface (Al2) —Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR O, P, T) 3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A) _ Umbric Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U) wetland hydrology must be present, Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR O, S) _ Delta Ochric (F17) (MLRA 151) unless disturbed or problematic. Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) _ Reduced Vertic (F18) (MLRA 150A, 1508) Sandy Redox (S5) _ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A) Stripped Matrix (S6) _ Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA 149A, 153C5 153D) _ Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U) Restrictive Layer (if observed): Type: 11 W Depth (inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes No Remarks: US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region – Version 2.0 WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region Project/Site: Arrington Bridge City/County: Wayne Sampling Date: July 8, 2013 Applicant/Owner: EBX State: NC Sampling Point: 202-H Investigator(s): G Lankford, B Hockett Section, Township, Range: Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Floodplain Local relief (concave, convex, none): concave -concave Slope (%): Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P, MLRA 133A Lat: 35.34566578 Long: -78.01480918 Datum: Soil Map Unit Name: Pantego loam NWI classification: NA Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No ✓ (If no, explain in Remarks.) Are Vegetation ✓ Soil ✓ or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes _/ No Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes ✓ No Is the Sampled Area Hydric Soil Present? Yes ✓ No ✓ within a Wetland? Yes No Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No V( Remarks: Site is in active pasture. Ditching has increased runoff rate. Rainfall is above normal. HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required) Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply) _ Surface Soil Cracks (136) Surface Water (Al) Aquatic Fauna (1313) _ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138) High Water Table (A2) Marl Deposits (1315) (LRR U) _ Drainage Patterns (1310) Saturation (A3) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl) — Moss Trim Lines (1316) Water Marks (B1) _ Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3) _ Dry -Season Water Table (C2) Sediment Deposits (62) _ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) _ Crayfish Burrows (C8) Drift Deposits (133) _ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) _ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) Algal Mat or Crust (B4) _ Thin Muck Surface (C7) _ Geomorphic Position (D2) Iron Deposits (135) —Other (Explain in Remarks) _ Shallow Aquitard (D3) — Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137) _ FAC -Neutral Test (D5) Water -Stained Leaves (69) _ Sphagnum moss (D8) (LRR T, U) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes No ✓ Depth (inches): Water Table Present? Yes ✓ No Depth (inches): -14 Saturation Present? Yes ✓ No Depth (inches): -14 Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No includes capillary fringe) Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: Remarks: US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0 VEGETATION (Five Strata) — Use scientific names of plants. Sampling Point: 202-H Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below). Data point in pasture. Bare earth (40 to 50 percent) exposed from livestock impacts. US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0 Absolute Dominant Indicator Dominance Test worksheet: Tree Stratum (Plot size: ) % Cover Species? Status Number of Dominant Species 1. That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 4 (A) 2. Total Number of Dominant 3• Species Across All Strata: 5 (B) 4. Percent of Dominant Species 5. That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 80 (A/B) 6. Prevalence Index worksheet: 0 = Total Cover 50% of total cover: 20% of total cover: Total % Cover of: Multiply by: Sapling Stratum (Plot size: ) OBL species x 1 = FACW species x 2 = 1 FAC species x 3 = 2 FACU species x 4 = 3 UPL species x 5 = 4 Column Totals: 0 (A) 0 (B) 5 6. Prevalence Index = B/A = 0 = Total Cover Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: 50% of total cover: 20% of total cover: ❑✓ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation Shrub Stratum (Plot size: ) ❑✓ 2 - Dominance Test is >50% 1 • ❑ 3 - Prevalence Index is <_3.0' 2• ❑ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain) 3. 4. 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must 5, be present, unless disturbed or problematic. 6. Definitions of Five Vegetation Strata: 0 = Total Cover Tree —Woody plants, excluding woody vines, 50% of total cover: 20% of total cover: approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and 3 in. Herb Stratum (Plot size: 20 foot radius ) (7.6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH). 1 Carex lurida 5 Yes OBL Sapling — Woody plants, excluding woody vines, 2 Juncus coriaceus 5 Yes FACW approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less 3 Polygonum pensylvanicum 5 Yes FACU than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH. q Cyperus rotundus 5 Yes FACW Shrub — Woody plants, excluding woody vines, 5 Eupatorium capillifolium 5 Yes FACU approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) in height. 6 Diodia virginiana 2 No FACW Herb — All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, including 7 herbaceous vines, regardless of size, and woody plants, except woody vines, less than approximately 8. 3 ft (1 m) in height. 9. Woody vine — All woody vines, regardless of height. 10. 11. 27 = Total Cover 50% of total cover: 20% of total cover: Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: ) 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. Hydrophytic 0 = Total Cover Vegetation n 50% of total cover: 20% of total cover: Present? Yes • No Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below). Data point in pasture. Bare earth (40 to 50 percent) exposed from livestock impacts. US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0 SOIL Sampling Point: 202-H Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features (inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type' Loc Texture Remarks 0-4 10YR 2/1 96 10YR 4/2 4 C PL SL 4-20 10YR 2/1 75 10YR 3/6 15 C PL CL -- -- -- 10YR 3/2 10 C M -- 20-26 10YR 6/1 85 10YR 5/8 10 C PL SCL -- -- -- 10YR 4/6 5 C PL -- 'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix. Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3: Histosol (Al) _ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR S, T, U) _ 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR O) Histic Epipedon (A2) _ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T, U) _ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S) Black Histic (A3) _ Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR O) _ Reduced Vertic (F18) (outside MLRA 150A,B) Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) _ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) _ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P, S, T) Stratified Layers (A5) _ Depleted Matrix (F3) _ Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P, T, U) ✓ Redox Dark Surface (F6) (MLRA 153B) 5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U) _ Depleted Dark Surface (F7) _ Red Parent Material (TF2) Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U) _ Redox Depressions (F8) _ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T) _ Marl (F10) (LRR U) _ Other (Explain in Remarks) Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) _ Depleted Ochric (F11) (MLRA 151) ✓ Thick Dark Surface (Al2) _ Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR O, P, T) 3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A) _ Umbric Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U) wetland hydrology must be present, Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR O, S) _ Delta Ochric (F17) (MLRA 151) unless disturbed or problematic. Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) _ Reduced Vertic (F18) (MLRA 150A, 1508) Sandy Redox (S5) _ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A) Stripped Matrix (S6) _ Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA 149A, 153C5 153D) _ Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U) Restrictive Layer (if observed): Type: Depth Hydric Soil Present? Yes W1 No (inches): Remarks: US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0 WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region Project/Site: Arrington Bridge City/County: Wayne Sampling Date: July 8, 2013 Applicant/Owner: EBX State: NC Sampling Point: 203-H Investigator(s): G Lankford, B Hockett Section, Township, Range: Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Floodplain Local relief (concave, convex, none): concvex-linear Slope (oho): 1 Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P, MLRA 133A Lat: 35.3455288 Long: -78.01492859 Datum: Soil Map Unit Name: Lakeland sand NWI classification: NA Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No ✓ (If no, explain in Remarks.) Are Vegetation ✓ Soil ✓ or Hydrology ✓ significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes _/ No Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No ✓ Is the Sampled Area Hydric Soil Present? Yes ✓ No ✓ within a Wetland? Yes No Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No ✓ Remarks: Site is in active pasture. Rainfall is above normal. HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required) Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply) _ Surface Soil Cracks (136) Surface Water (Al) Aquatic Fauna (1313) _ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138) High Water Table (A2) Marl Deposits (1315) (LRR U) _ Drainage Patterns (1310) Saturation (A3) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl) — Moss Trim Lines (1316) Water Marks (B1) _ Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3) _ Dry -Season Water Table (C2) Sediment Deposits (62) _ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) _ Crayfish Burrows (C8) Drift Deposits (133) _ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) _ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) Algal Mat or Crust (B4) _ Thin Muck Surface (C7) _ Geomorphic Position (D2) Iron Deposits (135) —Other (Explain in Remarks) _ Shallow Aquitard (D3) — Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137) _ FAC -Neutral Test (D5) Water -Stained Leaves (69) _ Sphagnum moss (D8) (LRR T, U) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes No ✓ Depth (inches): Water Table Present? Yes No ✓ Depth (inches): Saturation Present? Yes No ✓ Depth (inches): Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No includes capillary fringe) Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: Remarks: US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0 VEGETATION (Five Strata) — Use scientific names of plants. Sampling Point: 203-H Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below). Data point in pasture. Bare earth exposed from livestock impacts. US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2.0 Absolute Dominant Indicator Dominance Test worksheet: Tree Stratum (Plot size: 20 foot radius ) % Cover Species? Status Number of Dominant Species 1 Pinus taeda 10 Yes FAC That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 1 (A) 2. Total Number of Dominant 3• Species Across All Strata: 2 (B) 4. Percent of Dominant Species 5. That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 50 (A/B) 6. Prevalence Index worksheet: 10 = Total Cover 50% of total cover: 20% of total cover: Total % Cover of: Multiply by: Sapling Stratum (Plot size: ) OBL species x 1 = FACW species 2 x 2= 4 1 FAC species 10 x 3 = 30 2 FACU species 27 x 4 = 108 3 UPL species x 5 = 4 Column Totals: 39 (A) 142 (B) 5 6. Prevalence Index = B/A = 3.6 0 = Total Cover Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: 50% of total cover: 20% of total cover: ❑ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation Shrub Stratum (Plot size: ) ❑ 2 - Dominance Test is >50% 1 ❑ 3 -Prevalence Index is !-3.0' 2. ❑ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain) 3. 4. 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must 5, be present, unless disturbed or problematic. 6. Definitions of Five Vegetation Strata: 0 = Total Cover Tree -Woody plants, excluding woody vines, 50% of total cover: 20% of total cover: approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and 3 in. Herb Stratum (Plot size: 20 foot radius ) (7.6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH). 1 Digitaria sanguinalis 20 Yes FACU Sapling -Woody plants, excluding woody vines, 2 Eupatorium capillifolium 5 No FACU approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less 3 Rubus hispidus 2 No FACW than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH. 4 Lespedeza cuneata 2 No FACU Shrub - Woody plants, excluding woody vines, 5 approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) in height. 6. Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, including 7 herbaceous vines, regardless of size, and woody plants, except woody vines, less than approximately 8. 3 ft (1 m) in height. 9. Woody vine - All woody vines, regardless of height. 10. 11. 29 = Total Cover 50% of total cover: 20% of total cover: Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: ) 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. Hydrophytic 0 = Total Cover Vegetation F-1 50% of total cover: 20% of total cover: Present? Yes No W/ Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below). Data point in pasture. Bare earth exposed from livestock impacts. US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2.0 SOIL Sampling Point: 203-H Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features (inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type' Loc Texture Remarks 0-12 10YR2/2 95 10YR 3/6 5 C PL SL 12-22 10YR 5/2 95 10YR 4/6 10 C PL SC 'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix. Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3: Histosol (Al) _ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR S, T, U) _ 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR O) Histic Epipedon (A2) _ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T, U) _ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S) Black Histic (A3) _ Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR O) _ Reduced Vertic (F18) (outside MLRA 150A,B) Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) _ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) _ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P, S, T) Stratified Layers (A5) _ Depleted Matrix (F3) _ Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P, T, U) ✓ Redox Dark Surface (F6) (MLRA 153B) 5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U) _ Depleted Dark Surface (F7) _ Red Parent Material (TF2) Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U) _ Redox Depressions (F8) _ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T) _ Marl (F10) (LRR U) _ Other (Explain in Remarks) ✓ Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) _ Depleted Ochric (F11) (MLRA 151) Thick Dark Surface (Al2) _ Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR O, P, T) 3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A) _ Umbric Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U) wetland hydrology must be present, Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR O, S) _ Delta Ochric (F17) (MLRA 151) unless disturbed or problematic. Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) _ Reduced Vertic (F18) (MLRA 150A, 1508) Sandy Redox (S5) _ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A) Stripped Matrix (S6) _ Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA 149A, 153C5 153D) _ Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U) Restrictive Layer (if observed): Type: Depth Hydric Soil Present? Yes W1 No (inches): Remarks: US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0 WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region Project/Site: Arrington Bridge City/County: Wayne Sampling Date: July 8, 2013 Applicant/Owner: EBX State: NC Sampling Point: 204-H Investigator(s): G Lankford, B Hockett Section, Township, Range: Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Floodplain Local relief (concave, convex, none): Slope (%): <1 Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P, MLRA 133A Lat: 35.34644983 Long: -78.01568837 Datum: Soil Map Unit Name: Johnston sandy loam NWI classification: NA Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No ✓ (If no, explain in Remarks.) Are Vegetation ✓ Soil ✓ or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes _/ No Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes ✓ No Is the Sampled Area Hydric Soil Present? Yes ✓ No ✓ within a Wetland? Yes No Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No V( Remarks: Site is in active pasture and occasionally tilled. Ditching has increased runoff rate. Rainfall is above normal. HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required) Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply) _ Surface Soil Cracks (136) Surface Water (Al) Aquatic Fauna (1313) _ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138) High Water Table (A2) Marl Deposits (1315) (LRR U) _ Drainage Patterns (1310) Saturation (A3) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl) — Moss Trim Lines (1316) Water Marks (B1) _ Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3) _ Dry -Season Water Table (C2) Sediment Deposits (62) _ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) _ Crayfish Burrows (C8) Drift Deposits (133) _ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) _ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) Algal Mat or Crust (B4) _ Thin Muck Surface (C7) ✓ Geomorphic Position (D2) Iron Deposits (135) —Other (Explain in Remarks) _ Shallow Aquitard (D3) — Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137) _ FAC -Neutral Test (D5) Water -Stained Leaves (69) _ Sphagnum moss (D8) (LRR T, U) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes No ✓ Depth (inches): Water Table Present? Yes ✓ No Depth (inches): -17 Saturation Present? Yes ✓ No Depth (inches): -14 Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No includes capillary fringe) Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: Remarks: Rainfall above average prior to determination. Ditching has increased runoff rate. US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0 VEGETATION (Five Strata) — Use scientific names of plants. Sampling Point: 204-H Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below). Data point in pasture. Bare earth (40 to 50 percent) exposed from livestock impacts. US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0 Absolute Dominant Indicator Dominance Test worksheet: Tree Stratum (Plot size: ) % Cover Species? Status Number of Dominant Species 1. That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 1 (A) 2. Total Number of Dominant 3• Species Across All Strata: 2 (B) 4. Percent of Dominant Species 5. That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 50 (A/B) 6. Prevalence Index worksheet: 0 = Total Cover 50% of total cover: 20% of total cover: Total % Cover of: Multiply by: OBL species 25 x 1 = 25 Sapling Stratum (Plot size: ) 1 FACW species x 2 = 2 FAC species x 3 = FACU species 20 x 4 = 80 3 4 UPL species x 5 = Column Totals: 45 (A) 105 (B) 5 6. Prevalence Index = B/A = 2.3 0 = Total Cover Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: 50% of total cover: 20% of total cover: ❑ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation Shrub Stratum (Plot size: ) ❑ 2 - Dominance Test is >50% 1 • ❑✓ 3 - Prevalence Index is <_3.0' 2. ❑ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain) 3. 4• 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must 5, be present, unless disturbed or problematic. 6. Definitions of Five Vegetation Strata: 0 = Total Cover Tree —Woody plants, excluding woody vines, 50% of total cover: 20% of total cover: approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and 3 in. Herb Stratum (Plot size: 20 foot radius ) (7.6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH). 1 Carex lurida 25 Yes OBL Sapling — Woody plants, excluding woody vines, 2 Digitaria sanguinalis 20 Yes FACU approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH. 3. 4. Shrub — Woody plants, excluding woody vines, 5 approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) in height. 6. Herb — All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, including 7 herbaceous vines, regardless of size, and woody plants, except woody vines, less than approximately 8• 3 ft (1 m) in height. 9. Woody vine — All woody vines, regardless of height. 10. 11. 45 = Total Cover 50% of total cover: 20% of total cover: Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: ) 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. Hydrophytic 0 = Total Cover Vegetation n 50% of total cover: 20% of total cover: Present? Yes • No Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below). Data point in pasture. Bare earth (40 to 50 percent) exposed from livestock impacts. US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0 SOIL Sampling Point: 204-H Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features (inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type' Loc Texture Remarks 0-4 10YR 2/1 100 SiL 4-19 10YR 2/1 92 10YR 3/4 8 C PL SiL 'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix. Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3: Histosol (Al) _ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR S, T, U) _ 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR O) Histic Epipedon (A2) _ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T, U) _ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S) Black Histic (A3) _ Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR O) _ Reduced Vertic (F18) (outside MLRA 150A,B) Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) _ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) _ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P, S, T) Stratified Layers (A5) _ Depleted Matrix (F3) _ Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P, T, U) ✓ Redox Dark Surface (F6) (MLRA 153B) 5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U) _ Depleted Dark Surface (F7) _ Red Parent Material (TF2) Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U) _ Redox Depressions (F8) _ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T) _ Marl (F10) (LRR U) _ Other (Explain in Remarks) Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) _ Depleted Ochric (F11) (MLRA 151) Thick Dark Surface (Al2) _ Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR O, P, T) 3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A) _ Umbric Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U) wetland hydrology must be present, Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR O, S) _ Delta Ochric (F17) (MLRA 151) unless disturbed or problematic. Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) _ Reduced Vertic (F18) (MLRA 150A, 1508) Sandy Redox (S5) _ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A) Stripped Matrix (S6) _ Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA 149A, 153C5 153D) Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U) Restrictive Layer (if observed): Type: Depth (inches): Remarks: Hydric Soil Present? Yes W1 No 11 US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0 WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region Project/Site: Arrington Bridge City/County: Wayne Sampling Date: July 8, 2013 Applicant/Owner: EBX State: NC Sampling Point: 205-H Investigator(s): G Lankford, B Hockett Section, Township, Range: Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Floodplain Local relief (concave, convex, none): concave -linear Slope (%): 51 Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P, MLRA 133A Lat: 35.34686317 Long: -78.01432521 Datum: Soil Map Unit Name: Coxville loam NWI classification: NA Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No ✓ (If no, explain in Remarks.) Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes _/ No Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes ✓ No Is the Sampled Area Hydric Soil Present? Yes ✓ No ✓ within a Wetland? Yes No Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No V( Remarks: Site is in forest. Ditching has increased runoff rate. Rainfall is above normal. HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required) Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply) _ Surface Soil Cracks (136) Surface Water (Al) Aquatic Fauna (1313) _ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138) High Water Table (A2) Marl Deposits (1315) (LRR U) _ Drainage Patterns (1310) Saturation (A3) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl) — Moss Trim Lines (1316) Water Marks (B1) _ Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3) _ Dry -Season Water Table (C2) Sediment Deposits (62) _ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) _ Crayfish Burrows (C8) Drift Deposits (133) _ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) _ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) Algal Mat or Crust (B4) _ Thin Muck Surface (C7) ✓ Geomorphic Position (D2) Iron Deposits (135) —Other (Explain in Remarks) _ Shallow Aquitard (D3) — Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137) _ FAC -Neutral Test (D5) Water -Stained Leaves (69) _ Sphagnum moss (D8) (LRR T, U) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes No ✓ Depth (inches): Water Table Present? Yes No ✓ Depth (inches): Saturation Present? Yes No ✓ Depth (inches): Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No includes capillary fringe) Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: Remarks: US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0 VEGETATION (Five Strata) — Use scientific names of plants. Sampling Point: 205-H Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below). Limited herbaceous vegetation due to dense woody vines. US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0 Absolute Dominant Indicator Dominance Test worksheet: Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30 foot radius ) % Cover Species? Status Number of Dominant Species 1 Liquidambar styraciflua 45 Yes FACU That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 2 (A) 2 Ulmus americana 25 Yes FAC Total Number of Dominant 3• Species Across All Strata: 3 (B) 4. Percent of Dominant Species 5• That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 66 (A/B) 6. Prevalence Index worksheet: 70 = Total Cover 50% of total cover: 20% of total cover: Total % Cover of: Multiply by: Sapling Stratum (Plot size: 30 foot radius ) OBL species x 1 = 1 Acer rubrum 4 No FAC FACW species x 2 = FAC species x 3 = 2 FACU species x 4 = 3 UPL species x 5 = 4 Column Totals: 0 (A) 0 (B) 5 6. Prevalence Index = B/A = 4 = Total Cover Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: 50% of total cover: 20% of total cover: ❑ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 30 foot radius ) ❑✓ 2 - Dominance Test is >50% 1 Acer rubrum 1 No FAC ❑ 3 - Prevalence Index is <_3.0' 2 Hypericum hypericoides 1 No FAC ❑ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation (Explain) 3. 4• 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must 5, be present, unless disturbed or problematic. 6. Definitions of Five Vegetation Strata: 2 = Total Cover Tree —Woody plants, excluding woody vines, 50% of total cover: 20% of total cover: approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and 3 in. Herb Stratum (Plot size: 30 foot radius ) (7.6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH). 1 Juncus coriaceus 1 No FACW Sapling — Woody plants, excluding woody vines, 2, approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH. 3. 4. Shrub — Woody plants, excluding woody vines, 5 approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) in height. 6. Herb — All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, including 7 herbaceous vines, regardless of size, and woody plants, except woody vines, less than approximately 8. 3 ft (1 m) in height. 9. Woody vine — All woody vines, regardless of height. 10. 11. 1 = Total Cover 50% of total cover: 20% of total cover: Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30 foot radius ) 1 Smilax rotundifolia 60 Yes FAC 2 Campsis radicans 5 No FAC 3. 4. 5• Hydrophytic 65 = Total Cover Vegetation n 50% of total cover: 20% of total cover: Present? Yes • No Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below). Limited herbaceous vegetation due to dense woody vines. US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0 SOIL Sampling Point: 205-H Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features (inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type' Loc Texture Remarks 0-5 10YR 3/2 100 SL 5-9 10YR 4/2 80 10YR 3/6 20 C PL SCL 9-19 10YR 4/1 80 10YR 3/6 25 D PL SCL 'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix. Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3: Histosol (Al) _ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR S, T, U) _ 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR O) Histic Epipedon (A2) _ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T, U) _ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S) Black Histic (A3) _ Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR O) _ Reduced Vertic (F18) (outside MLRA 150A,B) Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) _ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) _ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P, S, T) Stratified Layers (A5) ✓ Depleted Matrix (F3) _ Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P, T, U) _ Redox Dark Surface (F6) (MLRA 153B) 5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U) _ Depleted Dark Surface (F7) _ Red Parent Material (TF2) Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U) _ Redox Depressions (F8) _ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T) _ Marl (F10) (LRR U) _ Other (Explain in Remarks) ✓ Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) _ Depleted Ochric (F11) (MLRA 151) Thick Dark Surface (Al2) _ Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR O, P, T) 3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A) _ Umbric Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U) wetland hydrology must be present, Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR O, S) _ Delta Ochric (F17) (MLRA 151) unless disturbed or problematic. Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) _ Reduced Vertic (F18) (MLRA 150A, 1508) Sandy Redox (S5) _ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A) Stripped Matrix (S6) _ Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA 149A, 153C5 153D) _ Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U) Restrictive Layer (if observed): Type: Depth Hydric Soil Present? Yes W1 No (inches): Remarks: US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0 WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region Project/Site: Arrington Bridge City/County: Wayne Sampling Date: July 9, 2013 Applicant/Owner: EBX State: NC Sampling Point: 206-J Investigator(s): G Lankford, B Hockett Section, Township, Range: Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Floodplain Local relief (concave, convex, none): concave -linear Slope (%): 51 Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P, MLRA 133A Lat: 35.34592615 Long: 35.34592615 Datum: Soil Map Unit Name: Pantego loam NWI classification: PF01A Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No ✓ (If no, explain in Remarks.) Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes _/ No Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes ✓ No Is the Sampled Area Hydric Soil Present? Yes ✓ No within a Wetland? Yes No Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes ✓ No Remarks: Site is in forest. Rainfall is above normal. Ditching has increased runoff rate. HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required) Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply) _ Surface Soil Cracks (136) Surface Water (Al) Aquatic Fauna (1313) _ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138) High Water Table (A2) Marl Deposits (1315) (LRR U) _ Drainage Patterns (1310) Saturation (A3) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl) — Moss Trim Lines (1316) Water Marks (B1) _ Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3) _ Dry -Season Water Table (C2) Sediment Deposits (62) _ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) _ Crayfish Burrows (C8) Drift Deposits (133) _ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) _ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) Algal Mat or Crust (B4) _ Thin Muck Surface (C7) ✓ Geomorphic Position (D2) Iron Deposits (135) —Other (Explain in Remarks) _ Shallow Aquitard (D3) — Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137) _ FAC -Neutral Test (D5) Water -Stained Leaves (69) _ Sphagnum moss (D8) (LRR T, U) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes No ✓ Depth (inches): Water Table Present? Yes ✓ No Depth (inches): -4 Saturation Present? Yes ✓ No Depth (inches): 0 Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes V/ No includes capillary fringe) Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: Remarks: US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0 VEGETATION (Five Strata) — Use scientific names of plants. Sampling Point: 206-J Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below). Limited herbaceous vegetation due to dense woody vines. US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0 Absolute Dominant Indicator Dominance Test worksheet: Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30 foot radius ) % Cover Species? Status Number of Dominant Species 1 Liquidambar styraciflua 35 Yes FACU That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 8 (A) 2 Acer rubrum 30 Yes FAC Total Number of Dominant 3. N ssa biflora Y 25 Yes OBL Species Across All Strata: 9 (B) 4 Salix nigra 5 No OBL Percent of Dominant Species 5• That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 89 (A/B) 6. Prevalence Index worksheet: 95 = Total Cover 50% of total cover: 20% of total cover: Total % Cover of: Multiply by: Sapling Stratum (Plot size: ) OBL species x 1 = FACW species x 2 = 1 FAC species x 3 = 2 FACU species x 4 = 3 UPL species x 5 = 4 Column Totals: 0 (A) 0 (B) 5 6• Prevalence Index = B/A = 0 = Total Cover Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: 50% of total cover: 20% of total cover: ❑✓ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 30 foot radius ) ❑✓ 2 - Dominance Test is >50% 1 Liquidambar styraciflua 10 Yes FAC ❑ 3 - Prevalence Index is <_3.0' 2 Cyrilla racemiflora 5 Yes FACW ❑ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation (Explain) 3 Ilex verticillata 3 No FACW 4• 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must 5, be present, unless disturbed or problematic. 6. Definitions of Five Vegetation Strata: 18 = Total Cover Tree —Woody plants, excluding woody vines, 50% of total cover: 20% of total cover: approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and 3 in. Herb Stratum (Plot size: 30 foot radius ) (7.6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH). 1 Saururus cernuus 15 Yes OBL Sapling — Woody plants, excluding woody vines, 2 Woodwardia areolata 10 Yes OBL approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less 3 Carex crinita 3 No FACW than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH. 4. Shrub — Woody plants, excluding woody vines, 5 approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) in height. 6. Herb — All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, including 7 herbaceous vines, regardless of size, and woody plants, except woody vines, less than approximately 8. 3 ft (1 m) in height. 9. Woody vine — All woody vines, regardless of height. 10. 11. 28 = Total Cover 50% of total cover: 20% of total cover: Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30 foot radius ) 1 Toxicodendron radicans 5 Yes FAC 2 Campsis radicans 5 Yes FAC 3. 4. 5• Hydrophytic 10 = Total Cover Vegetation n 50% of total cover: 20% of total cover: Present? Yes • No Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below). Limited herbaceous vegetation due to dense woody vines. US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0 SOIL Sampling Point: 206-J Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features (inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type' Loc Texture Remarks 0-6 10YR 2/1 100 mucky L 6-14 10YR 2/1 100 Sic 14-23 10YR 4/3 100 SCL 'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix. Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3: Histosol (Al) _ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR S, T, U) _ 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR O) Histic Epipedon (A2) _ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T, U) _ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S) Black Histic (A3) ✓ Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR O) _ Reduced Vertic (F18) (outside MLRA 150A,B) Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) _ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) _ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P, S, T) Stratified Layers (A5) _ Depleted Matrix (F3) _ Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P, T, U) _ Redox Dark Surface (F6) (MLRA 153B) ✓ 5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U) _ Depleted Dark Surface (F7) _ Red Parent Material (TF2) Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U) _ Redox Depressions (F8) _ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T) _ Marl (F10) (LRR U) _ Other (Explain in Remarks) Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) _ Depleted Ochric (F11) (MLRA 151) Thick Dark Surface (Al2) —Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR O, P, T) 3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A) _ Umbric Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U) wetland hydrology must be present, Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR O, S) _ Delta Ochric (F17) (MLRA 151) unless disturbed or problematic. Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) _ Reduced Vertic (F18) (MLRA 150A, 1508) Sandy Redox (S5) _ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A) Stripped Matrix (S6) _ Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA 149A, 153C5 153D) _ Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U) Restrictive Layer (if observed): Type: W1 Depth (inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes No Remarks: US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region – Version 2.0 WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region Project/Site: Arrington Bridge City/County: Wayne Sampling Date: July 9, 2013 Applicant/Owner: EBX State: NC Sampling Point: 207-H Investigator(s): G Lankford, B Hockett Section, Township, Range: Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Floodplain Local relief (concave, convex, none): concave -concave Slope (%): <1 Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P, MLRA 133A Lat: 35.3456825 Long: 35.3456825 Datum: Soil Map Unit Name: Pantego loam NWI classification: PF01A Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No ✓ (If no, explain in Remarks.) Are Vegetation ✓ Soil ✓ or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes _/ No Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes ✓ No Is the Sampled Area Hydric Soil Present? Yes ✓ No within a Wetland? Yes No Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes ✓ No Remarks: Site is in active pasture and occasionally tilled. Ditching has increased runoff rate. Rainfall is above normal and data point likely affected by floodwater from Neuse River.. HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required) Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply) _ Surface Soil Cracks (136) Surface Water (Al) Aquatic Fauna (1313) _ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138) ✓ High Water Table (A2) Marl Deposits (1315) (LRR U) _ Drainage Patterns (1310) ✓ Saturation (A3) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl) — Moss Trim Lines (1316) Water Marks (B1) _ Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3) _ Dry -Season Water Table (C2) Sediment Deposits (62) _ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) _ Crayfish Burrows (C8) Drift Deposits (133) _ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) _ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) Algal Mat or Crust (B4) _ Thin Muck Surface (C7) ✓ Geomorphic Position (D2) Iron Deposits (135) —Other (Explain in Remarks) _ Shallow Aquitard (D3) Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137) _ FAC -Neutral Test (D5) Water -Stained Leaves (69) _ Sphagnum moss (D8) (LRR T, U) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes No ✓ Depth (inches): Water Table Present? Yes ✓ No Depth (inches): -4 Saturation Present? Yes ✓ No Depth (inches): -4 Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes V/ No includes capillary fringe) Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: Remarks: Rainfall above average prior to determination. Data point likely affected by floodwater from Neuse River. US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0 VEGETATION (Five Strata) — Use scientific names of plants. Sampling Point: 207-H Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below). Data point in pasture. Bare earth (-25 percent) exposed from livestock impacts. US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0 Absolute Dominant Indicator Dominance Test worksheet: Tree Stratum (Plot size: ) % Cover Species? Status Number of Dominant Species 1. That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 2 (A) 2. Total Number of Dominant 3• Species Across All Strata: 3 (B) 4. Percent of Dominant Species 5. That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 66 (A/B) 6. Prevalence Index worksheet: 0 = Total Cover 50% of total cover: 20% of total cover: Total % Cover of: Multiply by: Sapling Stratum (Plot size: ) OBL species x 1 = FACW species x 2 = 1 FAC species x 3 = 2 FACU species x 4 = 3 UPL species x 5 = 4 Column Totals: 0 (A) 0 (B) 5 6. Prevalence Index = B/A = 0 = Total Cover Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: 50% of total cover: 20% of total cover: ❑ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation Shrub Stratum (Plot size: ) ❑✓ 2 - Dominance Test is >50% 1 • ❑ 3 - Prevalence Index is <_3.0' 2. ❑ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain) 3. 4• 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must 5, be present, unless disturbed or problematic. 6. Definitions of Five Vegetation Strata: 0 = Total Cover Tree —Woody plants, excluding woody vines, 50% of total cover: 20% of total cover: approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and 3 in. Herb Stratum (Plot size: 20 foot radius ) (7.6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH). 1 Juncus coriaceus 10 Yes FACW Sapling — Woody plants, excluding woody vines, 2 Rhynchospora sp. 5 Yes approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less 3 Eupatorium capillifolium 5 Yes FACU than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH. 4 Carex lurida 5 Yes OBL Shrub — Woody plants, excluding woody vines, 5 approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) in height. 6. Herb — All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, including 7 herbaceous vines, regardless of size, and woody plants, except woody vines, less than approximately 8. 3 ft (1 m) in height. 9. Woody vine — All woody vines, regardless of height. 10. 11. 25 = Total Cover 50% of total cover: 20% of total cover: Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: ) 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. Hydrophytic 0 = Total Cover Vegetation n 50% of total cover: 20% of total cover: Present? Yes • No Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below). Data point in pasture. Bare earth (-25 percent) exposed from livestock impacts. US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0 SOIL Sampling Point: 207-H Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features (inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type' Loc Texture Remarks 0-18 7.5YR 2.5/1 95 10YR 3/4 5 C PL SiCL 'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix. Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3: Histosol (Al) _ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR S, T, U) _ 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR O) Histic Epipedon (A2) _ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T, U) _ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S) Black Histic (A3) _ Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR O) _ Reduced Vertic (F18) (outside MLRA 150A,B) Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) _ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) _ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P, S, T) Stratified Layers (A5) _ Depleted Matrix (F3) _ Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P, T, U) _ Redox Dark Surface (F6) (MLRA 153B) 5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U) _ Depleted Dark Surface (F7) _ Red Parent Material (TF2) Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U) _ Redox Depressions (F8) _ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T) _ Marl (F10) (LRR U) _ Other (Explain in Remarks) Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) _ Depleted Ochric (F11) (MLRA 151) Thick Dark Surface (Al2) —Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR O, P, T) 3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A) v(Umbric Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U) wetland hydrology must be present, Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR O, S) _ Delta Ochric (F17) (MLRA 151) unless disturbed or problematic. Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) _ Reduced Vertic (F18) (MLRA 150A, 1508) Sandy Redox (S5) _ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A) Stripped Matrix (S6) _ Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA 149A, 153C5 153D) Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U) Restrictive Layer (if observed): Type: Depth (inches): Remarks: Hydric Soil Present? Yes W1 No 11 US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region – Version 2.0 WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region Project/Site: Arrington Bridge City/County: Wayne Sampling Date: July 9, 2013 Applicant/Owner: EBX State: NC Sampling Point: 208-H Investigator(s): G Lankford, B Hockett Section, Township, Range: Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Floodplain Local relief (concave, convex, none): concave -linear Slope (%): 51 Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P, MLRA 133A Lat: 35.34479247 Long: -78.01350857 Datum: Soil Map Unit Name: Weston loamy sand NWI classification: NA Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No ✓ (If no, explain in Remarks.) Are Vegetation ✓ Soil ✓ or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes _/ No Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes ✓ No Is the Sampled Area Hydric Soil Present? Yes ✓ No ✓ within a Wetland? Yes No Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes ✓ No Remarks: Site is in pasture Ditching has increased runoff rate. Rainfall is above normal. HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required) Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply) _ Surface Soil Cracks (136) Surface Water (Al) Aquatic Fauna (1313) _ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138) High Water Table (A2) Marl Deposits (1315) (LRR U) _ Drainage Patterns (1310) Saturation (A3) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl) — Moss Trim Lines (1316) Water Marks (B1) _ Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3) _ Dry -Season Water Table (C2) Sediment Deposits (62) _ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) _ Crayfish Burrows (C8) Drift Deposits (133) _ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) _ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) Algal Mat or Crust (B4) _ Thin Muck Surface (C7) ✓ Geomorphic Position (D2) Iron Deposits (135) —Other (Explain in Remarks) _ Shallow Aquitard (D3) — Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137) _ FAC -Neutral Test (D5) Water -Stained Leaves (69) _ Sphagnum moss (D8) (LRR T, U) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes No ✓ Depth (inches): Water Table Present? Yes No ✓ Depth (inches): Saturation Present? Yes ✓ No Depth (inches): -5 Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes V/ No includes capillary fringe) Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: Remarks: Rainfall above normal. May not meet jurisdictional hydrology during normal years. Site has been ditched and channelized. Current surface/groundwater affected by floodwater backed up from Neuse River. US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0 VEGETATION (Five Strata) — Use scientific names of plants. Sampling Point: 208-H Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below). Data point in pasture. Bare earth (-25 percent) exposed from livestock impacts. US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0 Absolute Dominant Indicator Dominance Test worksheet: Tree Stratum (Plot size: ) % Cover Species? Status Number of Dominant Species 1. That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 2 (A) 2. Total Number of Dominant 3• Species Across All Strata: 2 (B) 4. Percent of Dominant Species 5. That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 100 (A/B) 6. Prevalence Index worksheet: 0 = Total Cover 50% of total cover: 20% of total cover: Total % Cover of: Multiply by: Sapling Stratum (Plot size: ) OBL species x 1 = FACW species x 2 = 1 FAC species x 3 = 2 FACU species x 4 = 3 UPL species x 5 = 4 Column Totals: 0 (A) 0 (B) 5 6. Prevalence Index = B/A = 0 = Total Cover Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: 50% of total cover: 20% of total cover: ❑✓ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation Shrub Stratum (Plot size: ) ❑✓ 2 - Dominance Test is >50% 1 • ❑ 3 - Prevalence Index is <_3.0' 2. ❑ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain) 3. 4• 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must 5, be present, unless disturbed or problematic. 6. Definitions of Five Vegetation Strata: 0 = Total Cover Tree —Woody plants, excluding woody vines, 50% of total cover: 20% of total cover: approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and 3 in. Herb Stratum (Plot size: 30 foot radius ) (7.6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH). 1 Cyperus rotundus 20 Yes FAC Sapling — Woody plants, excluding woody vines, 2 Polygonum pensylvanicum 15 Yes FACW approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less 3 Juncus tenuis 5 No FAC than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH. 4 Echinochloa crus-galli 2 No FACW Shrub — Woody plants, excluding woody vines, 5 approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) in height. 6. Herb — All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, including 7 herbaceous vines, regardless of size, and woody plants, except woody vines, less than approximately 8• 3 ft (1 m) in height. 9. Woody vine — All woody vines, regardless of height. 10. 11. 42 = Total Cover 50% of total cover: 20% of total cover: Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: ) 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. Hydrophytic 0 = Total Cover Vegetation n 50% of total cover: 20% of total cover: Present? Yes • No Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below). Data point in pasture. Bare earth (-25 percent) exposed from livestock impacts. US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0 SOIL Sampling Point: 208-H Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features (inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type' Loc Texture Remarks 0-5 10 YR 3/1 92 10 YR 3/6 8 C PL SiL 5-17 10 YR 3/1 85 10 YR 3/6 15 C PL Sic 17-24 10 YR 5/1 90 10 YR 5/6 2 C PL SC -- -- -- 7.5 YR 3/4 8 C PL -- 'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix. Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3: Histosol (Al) _ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR S, T, U) _ 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR O) Histic Epipedon (A2) _ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T, U) _ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S) Black Histic (A3) _ Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR O) _ Reduced Vertic (F18) (outside MLRA 150A,B) Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) _ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) _ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P, S, T) Stratified Layers (A5) _ Depleted Matrix (F3) _ Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P, T, U) ✓ Redox Dark Surface (F6) (MLRA 153B) 5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U) _ Depleted Dark Surface (F7) _ Red Parent Material (TF2) Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U) _ Redox Depressions (F8) _ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T) _ Marl (F10) (LRR U) _ Other (Explain in Remarks) Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) _ Depleted Ochric (F11) (MLRA 151) ✓ Thick Dark Surface (Al2) _ Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR O, P, T) 3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A) _ Umbric Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U) wetland hydrology must be present, Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR O, S) _ Delta Ochric (F17) (MLRA 151) unless disturbed or problematic. Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) _ Reduced Vertic (F18) (MLRA 150A, 1508) Sandy Redox (S5) _ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A) Stripped Matrix (S6) _ Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA 149A, 153C5 153D) _ Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U) Restrictive Layer (if observed): Type: Depth Hydric Soil Present? Yes W1 No (inches): Remarks: US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0 WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region Project/Site: Arrington Bridge City/County: Wayne Sampling Date: July 8, 2013 Applicant/Owner: EBX State: NC Sampling Point: 209-U Investigator(s): G Lankford, B Hockett Section, Township, Range: Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Floodplain Local relief (concave, convex, none): concave -linear Slope (oho): 1% Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P, MLRA 133A Lat: 35.34446299 Long: -78.01398765 Datum: Soil Map Unit Name: Weston loamy sand NWI classification: NA Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No ✓ (If no, explain in Remarks.) Are Vegetation ✓ Soil or Hydrology ✓ significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes _/ No Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No ✓ Is the Sampled Area Hydric Soil Present? Yes No ✓ ✓ within a Wetland? Yes No Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No ✓ Remarks: Site is in active pasture. Rainfall is above normal. HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required) Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply) _ Surface Soil Cracks (136) Surface Water (Al) Aquatic Fauna (1313) _ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138) High Water Table (A2) Marl Deposits (1315) (LRR U) _ Drainage Patterns (1310) Saturation (A3) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl) — Moss Trim Lines (1316) Water Marks (B1) _ Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3) ✓ Dry -Season Water Table (C2) Sediment Deposits (62) _ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) _ Crayfish Burrows (C8) Drift Deposits (133) _ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) _ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) Algal Mat or Crust (B4) _ Thin Muck Surface (C7) _ Geomorphic Position (D2) Iron Deposits (135) —Other (Explain in Remarks) _ Shallow Aquitard (D3) — Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137) _ FAC -Neutral Test (D5) Water -Stained Leaves (69) _ Sphagnum moss (D8) (LRR T, U) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes No ✓ Depth (inches): Water Table Present? Yes ✓ No Depth (inches): -22 Saturation Present? Yes ✓ No Depth (inches): -17 Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No includes capillary fringe) Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: Remarks: Rainfall above normal. US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0 VEGETATION (Five Strata) — Use scientific names of plants. Sampling Point: 209-U Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below). Data point in pasture. Bare earth exposed (-10%) from livestock impacts. US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2.0 Absolute Dominant Indicator Dominance Test worksheet: Tree Stratum (Plot size: ) % Cover Species? Status Number of Dominant Species 1 Pinus taeda 15 Yes FAC That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 1 (A) 2. Total Number of Dominant 3• Species Across All Strata: 2 (B) 4. Percent of Dominant Species 5• That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 50 (A/B) 6. Prevalence Index worksheet: 15 = Total Cover 50% of total cover: 20% of total cover: Total % Cover of: Multiply by: Sapling Stratum (Plot size: ) OBL species x 1 = FACW species 40 x 2 = 80 1 2 FAC species x 3 = FACU species 55 x 4 = 220 3 4 UPL species x 5 = Column Totals: 95 (A) 300 (B) 5. 6. Prevalence Index = B/A = 3.1 0 = Total Cover Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: 50% of total cover: 20% of total cover: ❑ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation Shrub Stratum (Plot size: ) ❑ 2 - Dominance Test is >50% 1 ❑ 3 -Prevalence Index is !-3.0' 2. ❑ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain) 3. 4• 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must 5, be present, unless disturbed or problematic. 6. Definitions of Five Vegetation Strata: 0 = Total Cover Tree -Woody plants, excluding woody vines, 50% of total cover: 20% of total cover: approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and 3 in. Herb Stratum (Plot size: 10 foot radius ) (7.6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH). 1 Digitaria sanguinalis 55 Yes FACU Sapling -Woody plants, excluding woody vines, 2 Diodia virginiana 40 Yes FACW approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH. 3. 4. Shrub - Woody plants, excluding woody vines, 5 approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) in height. 6. Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, including 7 herbaceous vines, regardless of size, and woody plants, except woody vines, less than approximately 8. 3 ft (1 m) in height. 9. Woody vine - All woody vines, regardless of height. 10. 11. 95 = Total Cover 50% of total cover: 20% of total cover: Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: ) 1 • No FAC 2. 3. 4. 5• Hydrophytic 0 = Total Cover Vegetation F-1 50% of total cover: 20% of total cover: Present? Yes No W/ Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below). Data point in pasture. Bare earth exposed (-10%) from livestock impacts. US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2.0 SOIL Sampling Point: 209-U Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features (inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type' Loc Texture Remarks 0-17 10 YR 2/2 100 LS 17-28 10 YR 6/4 90 10 YR 5/8 10 C CS 'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix. Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3: Histosol (Al) _ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR S, T, U) _ 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR O) Histic Epipedon (A2) _ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T, U) _ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S) Black Histic (A3) _ Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR O) _ Reduced Vertic (F18) (outside MLRA 150A,B) Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) _ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) _ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P, S, T) Stratified Layers (A5) _ Depleted Matrix (F3) _ Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P, T, U) _ Redox Dark Surface (F6) (MLRA 153B) 5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U) _ Depleted Dark Surface (F7) _ Red Parent Material (TF2) Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U) _ Redox Depressions (F8) _ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T) _ Marl (F10) (LRR U) _ Other (Explain in Remarks) Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) _ Depleted Ochric (F11) (MLRA 151) Thick Dark Surface (Al2) —Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR O, P, T) 3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A) _ Umbric Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U) wetland hydrology must be present, Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR O, S) _ Delta Ochric (F17) (MLRA 151) unless disturbed or problematic. Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) _ Reduced Vertic (F18) (MLRA 150A, 1508) Sandy Redox (S5) _ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A) Stripped Matrix (S6) _ Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA 149A, 153C5 153D) _ Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U) Restrictive Layer (if observed): Type: 11 W Depth (inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes No Remarks: US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region – Version 2.0 WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region Project/Site: Arrington Bridge City/County: Wayne Sampling Date: July 8, 2013 Applicant/Owner: EBX State: NC Sampling Point: 210-U Investigator(s): G Lankford, B Hockett Section, Township, Range: Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Floodplain Local relief (concave, convex, none): convex -linear Slope (oho): 1% Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P, MLRA 133A Lat: 35.34404495 Long: -78.01036423 Datum: Soil Map Unit Name: Wickham loamy sand NWI classification: NA Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No ✓ (If no, explain in Remarks.) Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes _/ No Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes ✓ No Is the Sampled Area Hydric Soil Present? Yes No ✓ ✓ within a Wetland? Yes No Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No ✓ Remarks: Site is forested. Rainfall is above normal. HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required) Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply) _ Surface Soil Cracks (136) Surface Water (Al) Aquatic Fauna (1313) _ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138) High Water Table (A2) Marl Deposits (1315) (LRR U) _ Drainage Patterns (1310) Saturation (A3) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl) — Moss Trim Lines (1316) Water Marks (B1) _ Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3) _ Dry -Season Water Table (C2) Sediment Deposits (62) _ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) _ Crayfish Burrows (C8) Drift Deposits (133) _ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) _ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) Algal Mat or Crust (B4) _ Thin Muck Surface (C7) _ Geomorphic Position (D2) Iron Deposits (135) —Other (Explain in Remarks) _ Shallow Aquitard (D3) — Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137) _ FAC -Neutral Test (D5) Water -Stained Leaves (69) _ Sphagnum moss (D8) (LRR T, U) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes No ✓ Depth (inches): Water Table Present? Yes No ✓ Depth (inches): Saturation Present? Yes No ✓ Depth (inches): Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No includes capillary fringe) Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: Remarks: Rainfall above normal. US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0 VEGETATION (Five Strata) — Use scientific names of plants. Sampling Point: 210-U Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below) Data point in forest. US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0 Absolute Dominant Indicator Dominance Test worksheet: Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30 foot radius ) % Cover Species? Status Number of Dominant Species 1 Liquidambar styraciflua 40 Yes FACU That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 8 (A) 2 Acer rubrum 30 Yes FAC Total Number of Dominant 3• Pinus taeda s e 5 No FAC Species Across All Strata: 9 (B) 4 Nyssa sylvatica 5 No FAC Percent of Dominant Species 5. That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 89 (A/B) 6. Prevalence Index worksheet: 80 = Total Cover 50% of total cover: 20% of total cover: Total % Cover of: Multiply by: Sapling Stratum (Plot size: 30 foot radius ) OBL species x 1 = 1 Acer rubrum 5 Yes FAC FACW species x 2 = 2 Quercus phellos 5 Yes FACW FAC species x 3 = 3 Quercus falcata 3 No FACU FACU species x 4 = 4 Pinus taeda 3 No FAC UPL species x 5 = Column Totals: 0 (A) 0 (B) 5 6• Prevalence Index = B/A = 16 = Total Cover Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: 50% of total cover: 20% of total cover: ❑✓ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 30 foot radius ) ❑ 2 - Dominance Test is >50% 1 Quercus phellos 3 Yes FACW ❑ 3 -Prevalence Index is <_3.0' 2 Pinus taeda 3 Yes FAC ❑ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation (Explain) 3 Ligustrum sinense 3 Yes FAC 4• 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must 5, be present, unless disturbed or problematic. 6. Definitions of Five Vegetation Strata: 9 = Total Cover Tree —Woody plants, excluding woody vines, 50% of total cover: 20% of total cover: approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and 3 in. Herb Stratum (Plot size: 30 foot radius ) (7.6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH). 1 Juncus coriaceus 2 No FACW Sapling — Woody plants, excluding woody vines, 2 Sorghastrum nutans 1 No FACU approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH. 3. 4. Shrub — Woody plants, excluding woody vines, 5 approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) in height. 6. Herb — All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, including 7 herbaceous vines, regardless of size, and woody plants, except woody vines, less than approximately 8. 3 ft (1 m) in height. 9. Woody vine — All woody vines, regardless of height. 10. 11. 3 = Total Cover 50% of total cover: 20% of total cover: Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30 foot radius ) 1 Vitis rotundifolia 5 Yes FAC 2 Smilax rotundifolia 3 Yes FAC 3 Campsis radicans 1 No FAC 4. 5• Hydrophytic 9 = Total Cover Vegetation n 50% of total cover: 20% of total cover: Present? Yes • No Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below) Data point in forest. US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0 SOIL Sampling Point: 210-U Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features (inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type' Loc Texture Remarks 0-4 10 YR 2/2 100 SL 4-14 10 YR 4/3 70 10 YR 4/6 30 C SL 14-20 10 YR 4/6 60 10 YR 7/1 40 D SCL 'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix. Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3: Histosol (Al) _ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR S, T, U) _ 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR O) Histic Epipedon (A2) _ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T, U) _ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S) Black Histic (A3) _ Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR O) _ Reduced Vertic (F18) (outside MLRA 150A,B) Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) _ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) _ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P, S, T) Stratified Layers (A5) _ Depleted Matrix (F3) _ Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P, T, U) _ Redox Dark Surface (F6) (MLRA 153B) 5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U) _ Depleted Dark Surface (F7) _ Red Parent Material (TF2) Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U) _ Redox Depressions (F8) _ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T) _ Marl (F10) (LRR U) _ Other (Explain in Remarks) Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) _ Depleted Ochric (F11) (MLRA 151) Thick Dark Surface (Al2) —Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR O, P, T) 3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A) _ Umbric Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U) wetland hydrology must be present, Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR O, S) _ Delta Ochric (F17) (MLRA 151) unless disturbed or problematic. Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) _ Reduced Vertic (F18) (MLRA 150A, 1508) Sandy Redox (S5) _ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A) Stripped Matrix (S6) _ Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA 149A, 153C5 153D) _ Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U) Restrictive Layer (if observed): Type: Depth Hydric Soil Present? Yes 11 No W (inches): Remarks: US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region – Version 2.0 WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region Project/Site: Arrington Bridge City/County: Wayne Sampling Date: July 9, 2013 Applicant/Owner: EBX State: NC Sampling Point: 211-J Investigator(s): G Lankford, B Hockett Section, Township, Range: Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Floodplain Local relief (concave, convex, none): concave -linear Slope (%): 51 Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P, MLRA 133A Lat: 35.34377355 Long: -78.01045591 Datum: Soil Map Unit Name: Pantego loam NWI classification: PF01A Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No ✓ (If no, explain in Remarks.) Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes _/ No Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes ✓ No Is the Sampled Area Hydric Soil Present? Yes ✓ No within a Wetland? Yes No Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes ✓ No Remarks: Site is in forest. Ditching has increased runoff rate. Rainfall is above normal. HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required) Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply) _ Surface Soil Cracks (136) Surface Water (Al) Aquatic Fauna (1313) _ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138) ✓ High Water Table (A2) Marl Deposits (1315) (LRR U) _ Drainage Patterns (1310) ✓ Saturation (A3) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl) — Moss Trim Lines (1316) ✓ Water Marks (B1) _ Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3) _ Dry -Season Water Table (C2) Sediment Deposits (62) _ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) _ Crayfish Burrows (C8) Drift Deposits (133) _ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) _ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) Algal Mat or Crust (B4) _ Thin Muck Surface (C7) ✓ Geomorphic Position (D2) Iron Deposits (135) —Other (Explain in Remarks) _ Shallow Aquitard (D3) Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137) _ FAC -Neutral Test (D5) Water -Stained Leaves (69) _ Sphagnum moss (D8) (LRR T, U) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes No ✓ Depth (inches): Water Table Present? Yes ✓ No Depth (inches): -10 Saturation Present? Yes ✓ No Depth (inches): - 10 Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes V/ No includes capillary fringe) Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: Remarks: Rainfall above normal. Site has evidence of past ditching and channelization. US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0 VEGETATION (Five Strata) — Use scientific names of plants. Sampling Point: 211-J Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below) US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2.0 Absolute Dominant Indicator Dominance Test worksheet: Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30 foot radius ) % Cover Species? Status Number of Dominant Species 1 Acer rubrum 40 Yes FAC That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 2 (A) 2 Betula nigra 20 Yes FACW Total Number of Dominant 3 Salix nigra 5 No OBL 2 Species Across All Strata: (B) 4 Fraxinus pennsylvanica 5 No FACW Percent of Dominant Species 5. That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 100 (A/B) 6. Prevalence Index worksheet: 70 = Total Cover 50% of total cover: 20% of total cover: 14.8 Total % Cover of: Multiply by: Sapling Stratum (Plot size: ) OBL species x 1 = FACW species x 2 = 1 FAC species x 3 = 2 FACU species x 4 = 3 UPL species x 5 = 4 Column Totals: 0 (A) 0 (B) 5 6. Prevalence Index = B/A = 0 = Total Cover Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: 50% of total cover: 20% of total cover: ❑✓ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 30 foot radius ) ❑✓ 2 - Dominance Test is >50% 1 Acer rubrum 1 No FAC ❑ 3 - Prevalence Index is !-3.0' 2 Liquidambar styraciflua 1 Yes FACU ❑ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation (Explain) 3. 4. 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must 5, be present, unless disturbed or problematic. 6. Definitions of Five Vegetation Strata: 2 = Total Cover Tree -Woody plants, excluding woody vines, 50% of total cover: 20% of total cover: approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and 3 in. Herb Stratum (Plot size: 30 foot radius ) (7.6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH). 1 Rubus hispidus 3 No FACW Sapling -Woody plants, excluding woody vines, 2 Boehmeria cylindrica 1 No FACW approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH. 3. 4. Shrub - Woody plants, excluding woody vines, 5 approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) in height. 6. Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, including 7 herbaceous vines, regardless of size, and woody plants, except woody vines, less than approximately 8. 3 ft (1 m) in height. 9. Woody vine - All woody vines, regardless of height. 10. 11. 4 = Total Cover 50% of total cover: 20% of total cover: Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: ) 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. Hydrophytic 0 = Total Cover Vegetation n 50% of total cover: 20% of total cover: Present? Yes • No Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below) US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2.0 SOIL Sampling Point: 211-J Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features (inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type' Loc Texture Remarks 0-2 10 YR 2/2 100 Sic 2-18 10 YR 5/1 90 10 YR 5/8 10 C PL SiL 'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix. Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3: Histosol (Al) _ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR S, T, U) _ 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR O) Histic Epipedon (A2) _ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T, U) _ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S) Black Histic (A3) _ Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR O) _ Reduced Vertic (F18) (outside MLRA 150A,B) Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) _ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) _ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P, S, T) Stratified Layers (A5) ✓ Depleted Matrix (F3) _ Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P, T, U) _ Redox Dark Surface (F6) (MLRA 153B) 5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U) _ Depleted Dark Surface (F7) _ Red Parent Material (TF2) Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U) _ Redox Depressions (F8) _ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T) _ Marl (F10) (LRR U) _ Other (Explain in Remarks) ✓ Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) _ Depleted Ochric (F11) (MLRA 151) Thick Dark Surface (Al2) _ Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR O, P, T) 3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A) _ Umbric Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U) wetland hydrology must be present, Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR O, S) _ Delta Ochric (F17) (MLRA 151) unless disturbed or problematic. Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) _ Reduced Vertic (F18) (MLRA 150A, 1508) Sandy Redox (S5) _ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A) Stripped Matrix (S6) _ Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA 149A, 153C5 153D) _ Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U) Restrictive Layer (if observed): Type: W1 Depth (inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes No Remarks: US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0 WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region Project/Site: Arrington Bridge City/County: Wayne Sampling Date: July 8, 2013 Applicant/Owner: EBX State: NC Sampling Point: 212-U Investigator(s): G Lankford, B Hockett Section, Township, Range: Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Floodplain Local relief (concave, convex, none): convex -linear Slope (oho): 1% Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P, MLRA 133A Lat: 35.34242708 Long: -78.00844218 Datum: Soil Map Unit Name: Wickham loamy sand NWI classification: PF01A Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No ✓ (If no, explain in Remarks.) Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes _/ No Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes ✓ No Is the Sampled Area Hydric Soil Present? Yes No ✓ ✓ within a Wetland? Yes No Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No ✓ Remarks: Site is in forested. Rainfall is above normal. HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required) Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply) _ Surface Soil Cracks (136) Surface Water (Al) Aquatic Fauna (1313) _ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138) High Water Table (A2) Marl Deposits (1315) (LRR U) _ Drainage Patterns (1310) Saturation (A3) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl) — Moss Trim Lines (1316) Water Marks (B1) _ Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3) _ Dry -Season Water Table (C2) Sediment Deposits (62) _ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) _ Crayfish Burrows (C8) Drift Deposits (133) _ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) _ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) Algal Mat or Crust (B4) _ Thin Muck Surface (C7) _ Geomorphic Position (D2) Iron Deposits (135) —Other (Explain in Remarks) _ Shallow Aquitard (D3) — Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137) _ FAC -Neutral Test (D5) Water -Stained Leaves (69) _ Sphagnum moss (D8) (LRR T, U) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes No ✓ Depth (inches): Water Table Present? Yes No ✓ Depth (inches): Saturation Present? Yes No ✓ Depth (inches): Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No includes capillary fringe) Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: Remarks: Rainfall above normal. US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0 VEGETATION (Five Strata) — Use scientific names of plants. Sampling Point: 212-U Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below) Data point in forest. US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0 Absolute Dominant Indicator Dominance Test worksheet: Tree Stratum (Plot size: 20 foot radius ) % Cover Species? Status Number of Dominant Species 1 Liquidambar styraciflua 40 Yes FACU That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 8 (A) 2 Pinus taeda 20 Yes FAC Total Number of Dominant ru 3• Quercus laurifolia 5 FACW NO Species Across All Strata: $ (B) 4. Percent of Dominant Species 5. That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 100 (A/B) 6. Prevalence Index worksheet: 65 = Total Cover 50% of total cover: 20% of total cover: 13 Total % Cover of: Multiply by: Sapling Stratum (Plot size: 20 foot radius ) OBL species x 1 = 1 Acer rubrum 5 Yes FAC FACW species x 2 = FAC species x 3 = 2 FACU species x 4 = 3 UPL species x 5 = 4 Column Totals: 0 (A) 0 (B) 5 6. Prevalence Index = B/A = 5 = Total Cover Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: 50% of total cover: 20% of total cover: ❑ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 20 foot radius ) ❑✓ 2 - Dominance Test is >50% 1 Quercus laurifolia 1 Yes FACW ❑ 3 - Prevalence Index is <_3.0' 2 Ligustrum sinense 2 Yes FAC ❑ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation (Explain) 3 Ilex verticillata 2 Yes FACW 4• 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must 5, be present, unless disturbed or problematic. 6. Definitions of Five Vegetation Strata: 5 = Total Cover Tree —Woody plants, excluding woody vines, 50% of total cover: 20% of total cover: approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and 3 in. Herb Stratum (Plot size: ) (7.6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH). 1 • Sapling — Woody plants, excluding woody vines, 2, approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH. 3. 4. Shrub — Woody plants, excluding woody vines, 5 approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) in height. 6. Herb — All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, including 7 herbaceous vines, regardless of size, and woody plants, except woody vines, less than approximately $• 3 ft (1 m) in height. 9. Woody vine — All woody vines, regardless of height. 10. 11. 0 = Total Cover 50% of total cover: 20% of total cover: Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 20 foot radius ) 1 Smilax rotundifolia 20 Yes FAC 2 Toxicodendron radicans 10 Yes FAC 3. 4. 5. Hydrophytic 30 = Total Cover Vegetation n 50% of total cover: 20% of total cover: Present? Yes • No Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below) Data point in forest. US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0 SOIL Sampling Point: 212-U Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features (inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type' Loc Texture Remarks 0-5 10 YR 2/2 100 SL 5-11 10 YR 4/2 70 10 YR 4/4 5 C PL LS 11-16 10 YR 5/6 60 10 YR 5/8 15 C M cLS -- 10 YR 6/3 10 D M -- 16-26 7.5 YR 6/6 7.5 YR 6/2 20 D M cLS -- 7.5 YR 5/8 20 C PL -- 'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix. Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3: Histosol (Al) _ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR S, T, U) _ 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR O) Histic Epipedon (A2) _ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T, U) _ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S) Black Histic (A3) _ Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR O) _ Reduced Vertic (F18) (outside MLRA 150A,B) Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) _ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) _ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P, S, T) Stratified Layers (A5) _ Depleted Matrix (F3) _ Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P, T, U) _ Redox Dark Surface (F6) (MLRA 153B) 5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U) _ Depleted Dark Surface (F7) _ Red Parent Material (TF2) Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U) _ Redox Depressions (F8) _ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T) _ Marl (F10) (LRR U) _ Other (Explain in Remarks) Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) _ Depleted Ochric (F11) (MLRA 151) Thick Dark Surface (Al2) —Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR O, P, T) 3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A) _ Umbric Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U) wetland hydrology must be present, Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR O, S) _ Delta Ochric (F17) (MLRA 151) unless disturbed or problematic. Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) _ Reduced Vertic (F18) (MLRA 150A, 1508) Sandy Redox (S5) _ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A) Stripped Matrix (S6) _ Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA 149A, 153C5 153D) _ Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U) Restrictive Layer (if observed): Type: 11 W Depth (inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes No Remarks: US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region – Version 2.0 WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region Project/Site: Arrington Bridge City/County: Wayne Sampling Date: July 9, 2013 Applicant/Owner: EBX State: NC Sampling Point: 213-J Investigator(s): G Lankford, B Hockett Section, Township, Range: Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Floodplain Local relief (concave, convex, none): concave -linear Slope (%): 51 Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P, MLRA 133A Lat: 35.34173187 Long: -78.00667436 Datum: Soil Map Unit Name: Coxville loam NWI classification: PF01A Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No ✓ (If no, explain in Remarks.) Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes _/ No Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes ✓ No Is the Sampled Area Hydric Soil Present? Yes ✓ No within a Wetland? Yes No Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes ✓ No Remarks: Site is in forest. Ditching has increased runoff rate. Rainfall is above normal. HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required) Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply) _ Surface Soil Cracks (136) Surface Water (Al) Aquatic Fauna (1313) _ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138) ✓ High Water Table (A2) Marl Deposits (1315) (LRR U) _ Drainage Patterns (1310) ✓ Saturation (A3) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl) — Moss Trim Lines (1316) ✓ Water Marks (B1) _ Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3) _ Dry -Season Water Table (C2) Sediment Deposits (62) _ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) _ Crayfish Burrows (C8) Drift Deposits (133) _ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) _ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) Algal Mat or Crust (B4) _ Thin Muck Surface (C7) ✓ Geomorphic Position (D2) Iron Deposits (135) —Other (Explain in Remarks) _ Shallow Aquitard (D3) Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137) ✓ FAC -Neutral Test (D5) ✓ Water -Stained Leaves (69) _ Sphagnum moss (D8) (LRR T, U) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes No ✓ Depth (inches): Water Table Present? Yes ✓ No Depth (inches): -3 Saturation Present? Yes ✓ No Depth (inches): 0 Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes V/ No includes capillary fringe) Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: Remarks: Rainfall above normal. May not meet jurisdictional hydrology during normal years. Site has been ditched and channelized. US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0 VEGETATION (Five Strata) — Use scientific names of plants. Sampling Point: 213-J Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below). Data point in pasture. Bare earth (-25 percent) exposed from livestock impacts. US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0 Absolute Dominant Indicator Dominance Test worksheet: Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30 foot radius ) % Cover Species? Status Number of Dominant Species 1 Acer rubrum 60 Yes FAC That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 4 (A) 2 Nyssa biflora 5 No OBL Total Number of Dominant 3 Liquidambar styraciflua 5 No FAC 4 Species Across All Strata: (B) 4. Percent of Dominant Species 5. That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 100 (A/B) 6. Prevalence Index worksheet: 70 = Total Cover 50% of total cover: 20% of total cover: 14 Total % Cover of: Multiply by: Sapling Stratum (Plot size: ) OBL species x 1 = FACW species x 2 = 1 FAC species x 3 = 2 FACU species x 4 = 3 UPL species x 5 = 4 Column Totals: 0 (A) 0 (B) 5 6. Prevalence Index = B/A = 0 = Total Cover Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: 50% of total cover: 20% of total cover: ❑✓ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 30 foot radius ) ❑✓ 2 - Dominance Test is >50% 1 Acer rubrum 2 No FAC ❑ 3 - Prevalence Index is <_3.0' 2 Liquidambar styraciflua 2 No FAC ❑ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation (Explain) 3. 4. 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must 5, be present, unless disturbed or problematic. 6. Definitions of Five Vegetation Strata: 4 = Total Cover Tree —Woody plants, excluding woody vines, 50% of total cover: 20% of total cover: approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and 3 in. Herb Stratum (Plot size: 30 foot radius ) (7.6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH). 1 Saururus cernuus 25 Yes OBL Sapling — Woody plants, excluding woody vines, 2 Woodwardia areolata 20 Yes OBL approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less 3 Arundinaria gigantea 5 No FACW than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH. 4. Shrub — Woody plants, excluding woody vines, 5 approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) in height. 6. Herb — All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, including 7 herbaceous vines, regardless of size, and woody plants, except woody vines, less than approximately 8. 3 ft (1 m) in height. 9. Woody vine — All woody vines, regardless of height. 10. 11. 50 = Total Cover 50% of total cover: 20% of total cover: 8 Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30 foot radius ) 1 Toxicodendron radicans 10 Yes FAC 2 Smilax laurifolia 2 No FACW 3. 4. 5. Hydrophytic 12 = Total Cover Vegetation n 50% of total cover: 20% of total cover: 2.4 Present? Yes • No Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below). Data point in pasture. Bare earth (-25 percent) exposed from livestock impacts. US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0 SOIL Sampling Point: 213-J Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features (inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type' Loc Texture Remarks 0-20 7.5 YR 2.5/1 100 mucky L 22-24 N 2.5/- 100 mucky L 24-28 10YR 5/1 100 cLS 'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix. Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3: Histosol (Al) _ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR S, T, U) _ 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR O) Histic Epipedon (A2) _ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T, U) _ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S) Black Histic (A3) _ Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR O) _ Reduced Vertic (F18) (outside MLRA 150A,B) Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) _ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) _ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P, S, T) Stratified Layers (A5) _ Depleted Matrix (F3) _ Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P, T, U) _ Redox Dark Surface (F6) (MLRA 153B) 5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U) _ Depleted Dark Surface (F7) _ Red Parent Material (TF2) ✓ Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U) _ Redox Depressions (F8) _ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T) _ Marl (F10) (LRR U) _ Other (Explain in Remarks) Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) _ Depleted Ochric (F11) (MLRA 151) Thick Dark Surface (Al2) —Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR O, P, T) 3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A) _ Umbric Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U) wetland hydrology must be present, Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR O, S) _ Delta Ochric (F17) (MLRA 151) unless disturbed or problematic. Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) _ Reduced Vertic (F18) (MLRA 150A, 1508) Sandy Redox (S5) _ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A) Stripped Matrix (S6) _ Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA 149A, 153C5 153D) _ Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U) Restrictive Layer (if observed): Type: W1 Depth (inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes No Remarks: US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region – Version 2.0