20130682 Ver 1_401 Application_20130713

20130682
CDM. Silh
5400 Glenwood Avenue, Suite 300
Raleigh, North Carolina 27612
tel: [phone]
fax: [phone]
cdmsmith.com
July 2, 2013
Mr. Dave Parnell
North Carolina Division of Water Quality
401/ Wetlands Unit
1650 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC, 27699 -1650
Subject: City of Raleigh, North Carolina
Brockton Drive Lake and Dam Project
CDM Smith Project No. 71414
USACE Project No. 2009 -01069
Pre - Construction Notification (PCN)
Dear Mr. Parnell:
a "I
suer
The City of Raleigh proposes to construct dam improvements to Brockton Drive Lake located
off Brockton Drive in eastern Raleigh, near Capital Boulevard, north of I-440. The work
associated with this project generally includes dam improvements, sediment removal from the
Brockton Drive lower lake, and conversion of the upper, unmaintained amenity pond into a
natural channel, on an unnamed tributary to Marsh Creek.
USACE and DWQ involvement and concurrence were sought during the preliminary design to
ensure the approach can be permitted as described under Nationwide Permits (NWPs) through
a meeting with both agencies, the City of Raleigh, and CDM Smith on July 16, 2010. The scope
of the work has not changed since this meeting and involves in- stream work including
excavation of a channel within the upper pond, installation of grade control structures, and
grading and vegetation of the banks and riparian buffer and is expected to be permitted under
NWP 3 and 13. Construction within the lower lake includes removal of accumulated sediment
and structural repairs to the dam and is expected to be permitted under NWP 3 for
maintenance of existing structures. Impacts to the stream associated with hard armoring
protection are expected to be permitted under NWP 13 for bank stabilization. DWQ 401
General Certifications 3883 and 3885 are expected to correspond to the applicable NWPs for the
impacts to surface waters.
The construction area extends from near Millbrook Road to Brockton Drive as shown the
attached Figures. Jurisdictional waters on the site begin with a highly urbanized stream
ranging from 3 - 8 feet wide, flowing into the upper lake after passing very closely to a pool
deck structure. The upper pond has been gradually lowering over the last few years and the
area at the upstream end is transitioning to stream channel. The upper pond is drained
WATER + ENVIRONMENT + TRANSPORTATION + ENERGY + FACILITIES

Smith
Mr. David Schaeffer
July 2, 2013
Page 2
occasionally overflows through a riprap channel. The lower lake is controlled by a deteriorated
riser/barrel structure discharging to a concrete splash pad and riprap armored plungepool.
The plunge pool is immediately followed by concrete box culverts conveying flows beneath
Brockton Drive to enter Marsh Creek not far downstream.
Open water, riparian buffer, and stream impacts are listed on the attached Pre - Construction
Notification (PCN) and shown on four impact area figures with the 404/401 impacts to Waters
of the U.S. on the first two figures and the Neuse buffer impacts on two separate figures for
clarity. A detailed delineation of impact areas is provided based on temporary versus
permanent, and excavation versus fill impacts. The design includes provisions for temporary
and permanent stabilization of the urban stream and lake system. Permanent measures to
achieve the project objectives include modification of the upper and lower lake dams as well as
conversion to a stream channel in the upper lake and localized application of riprap.
Temporary provisions include stream diversion with a temporary cofferdam to protect the dam
construction.
Enclosed please find 1 copy of the PCN form for the project and attachments including:
A. Topographic Project Location Map
S. Property Tax Parcel Descriptions
C. 'Letters from FWS and SHPO
D. Impact Area Figures 1 - 4
E. Select Plan Sheets for Permit Review (1 half size set)
F. jurisdictional Determination Form
G. Site Photos
Please call me at (919) 787 -56.20 if you have any questions. Thank you for your assistance.
Very truly yours,
Robert Hopper, P.E.
Project Engineer
CDM Smith
Enclosure: Preconstruction Notification Form with Attachments A through G
cc: Dave Parnell, DWQ
Ken Carper, Project Manager, City of Raleigh
Mike Brinchek, Project Manager, CDM Smith

Smith
5400 Glenwood Avenue, Suite 300
Raleigh, North Carolina 27612
tel: [phone]
fax: [phone]
cdmsmith.com
July 2, 2013
Mr. Dave Parnell
North Carolina Division of Water Quality
401/ Wetlands Unit
1650 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC, 27699 -1650
Subject: City of Raleigh, North Carolina
Brockton Drive fake and Dam Project
CDM Smith Project No. 71414
USACE Project No. 2009 -01069
Pre-- Construction Notification (PCN)
Dear Mr. Parnell:
The City of Raleigh proposes to construct dam improvements to Brockton Drive lake located
off Brockton Drive in eastern Raleigh, near Capital Boulevard, north of I -440. The work
associated with this project generally includes dam improvements, sediment removal from the
Brockton Drive lower lake, and conversion of the upper, unmaintained amenity pond into a
natural channel, on an unnamed tributary to Marsh Creek.
USACE and DWQ involvement and concurrence were sought during the preliminary design to
ensure the approach can be permitted as described under Nationwide Permits (NWPs) through
a meeting with both agencies, the City of Raleigh, and CDM Smith on July 16, 2010. The scope
of the work has not changed since this meeting and involves in- stream work including
excavation of a channel within the upper pond, installation of grade control structures, and
grading and vegetation of the banks and riparian buffer and is expected to be permitted under
NWP 3 and 13. Construction within the lower lake includes removal of accumulated sediment
and structural repairs to the dam and is expected to be permitted under NWP 3 for
maintenance of existing structures. Impacts to the stream associated with hard armoring
protection are expected to be permitted under NWP 13 for bank stabilization. DWQ 401
General Certifications 3883 and 3885 are expected to correspond to the applicable NWPs for the
impacts to surface waters.
The construction area extends from near Milibrook Road to Brockton Drive as shown the
attached Figures. Jurisdictional waters on the site begin with a highly urbanized stream
ranging from 3 - 8 feet wide, flowing into the upper lake after passing very closely to a pool
deck structure. The upper pond has been gradually lowering over the last few years and the
area at the upstream end is transitioning to stream channel. The upper pond is drained
WATER + ENVIRONMENT +TRANSPORTATION d- ENERGY + FACILITIES

CD Sith
Mr. Dave Parnell
July 2, 2013
Page 2
through what remains of a subsurface riser /barrel structure through the upper dam and
occasionally overflows through a riprap channel. The lower lake is controlled by a deteriorated
riser /barrel structure discharging to a concrete splash pad and riprap armored plungepool,
The plunge pool is immediately followed by concrete box culverts conveying flows beneath
Brockton Drive to enter Marsh Creek not far downstream.
Open water, riparian buffer, and stream impacts are listed on the attached Pre - Construction
Notification (PCN) and shown on four impact area figures with the 404/401 impacts to Waters
of the US, on the first two figures and the Neuse buffer impacts on two separate figures for
clarity. A detailed delineation of impact areas is provided based on temporary versus
permanent, and excavation versus fill impacts. The design includes provisions for temporary
and permanent stabilization of the urban stream and lake system. Permanent measures to
achieve the project objectives include modification of the upper and lower lake dams as well as
conversion to a stream channel in the upper lake and localized application of riprap.
Temporary provisions include stream diversion with a temporary cofferdam to protect the darn
construction.
Enclosed please find 5 copies of the PCN form for the project and attachments including:
A. Topographic Project Location Map
B. Property Tax Parcel Descriptions
C. Letters from FWS and SHPO
D. Impact Area Figures 1 - 4
E. Select Plan Sheets for Permit Review (2 full size sets and 3 -11x17 size)
F. Jurisdictional Determination Form
G. Site Photos
H. Check payable to NCDWQ in the amount of $570 for the application fee
Please call me at (919) 787 -5620 if you have questions. Thank you for your assistance.
Very truly yours,
Robert Hopper, P.E.
Project Engineer, CDM Smith
Enclosure: Preconstruction Notification Form with Attachments A through H
cc: David Schaeffer, USAGE; Ken Carper, Project Manager, City of Raleigh; and
Mike Brinchek, Project Manager, CDM Smith

�,aF wArF9
O' QG
Office Use Only:
Corps action )D no.
DWQ project no.
Farm Version 1.3 Dec 10 2008
Page 1 of 13
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
Pre - Construction Notification PCN Form
A. Applicant Information
1.
Processing
1a.
Type(s) of approval sought from the
Corps:
®Section 404 Permit ❑ Section 10 Permit
1b.
Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number: NWP 3 and 13 or General Permit (GP) number:
1c.
Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps?
® Yes ❑ No
1d.
Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply):
® 401 Water Quality Certification — Regular ❑ Non -404 Jurisdictional General Permit
❑ 401 Water Quality Certification — Express ® Riparian Buffer Authorization
1 e.
Is this notification solely for the record
because written approval is not required?
For the record Only for DWQ 401
Certification:
❑ Yes ® No
For the record only for Corps Permit:
❑ Yes ® No
1f.
Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for mitigation
of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank or in -lieu
fee program.
❑ Yes ® No
1 g.
Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties. If yes, answer 1h
below.
❑ Yes ® No
1h.
Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)?
❑ Yes ® No
2.
Project Information
2a.
Name of project:
Brockton Drive Lake and Dam Project
2b.
County:
Wake County
2c.
Nearest municipality / town:
Raleigh
2d.
Subdivision name:
Walden Woods
2e.
NCDOT only, T.I.P. or state
project no:
3.
Owner Information
3a.
Name(s) on Recorded Deed:
The applicant (City of Raleigh) will obtain a permanent drainage easement for the entire
project area comprising parts of 16 tax parcels as shown and described in Attachment
B as well as a restoration easement for the upper lake stream restoration area. Access
to manholes for sewer pump around will be attained via existing sewer easements.
3b.
Deed Book and Page No.
3c.
Responsible Party (for LLC if
applicable):
3d.
Street address:
3e.
City, state, zip:
3f.
Telephone no.:
3g.
Fax no.:
3h.
Email address:
Page 1 of 13
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

4.
Applicant Information (if different from owner)
4a.
Applicant is:
❑ Agent ® Other, specify: Project Owner
4b.
Name:
Ken Carper
4c.
Business name
(if applicable):
City of Raleigh
4d.
Street address:
222 West Hargett Street, Room 301
4e.
City, state, zip:
Raleigh, North Carolina, 27602
4f.
Telephone no.:
919 - 996 -4019
4g.
Fax no.:
919 - 996 -7633
4h.
Email address:
kenneth.carper @raleigh.nc.gov
5.
Agent/Consultant Information (if applicable)
5a.
Name:
Robert Hopper
5b.
Business name
(if applicable):
CDM Smith
5c.
Street address:
5400 Glenwood Ave, Suite 300
5d.
City, state, zip:
Raleigh, North Carolina, 27612
5e.
Telephone no.:
919 325 3500
5f.
Fax no.:
919 781 5730
5g.
Email address:
hopperry @cdmsmith.com
Page 2 of 13
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

B.
Project Information and Prior Project History
1.
Property Identification
1716915985, 1716925099 ,1716937011,1716917986,
1716917654, 1716917986 ,1726012812,1716917654,
1a.
Property identification no. (tax PIN or parcel ID):
1716929030, 1726021185, 1726021235, 1726021318,
1726021564,1726021694 ,1726022785,1726022991,
1726032180,1726032374
(Refer to Attachment B for Parcel Map and Information)
1b.
Site coordinates (in decimal degrees):
Latitude: 35.845022 Longitude: - 78.59456
(DD.DDDDDD) (- DD.DDDDDD)
1c.
Property size:
Sum of all properties = 39.3 acres
2.
Surface Waters
2a.
Name of nearest body of water (stream, river, etc.) to
Project is on Unnamed Tributary to Marsh Creek
proposed project:
2b.
Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water:
C; NSW
2c.
River basin:
Neuse
3.
Project Description
3a.
Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this
application:
Two amenity ponds in need of maintenance are surrounded by multifamily residentially developed land. The Upper
Brockton Drive Lake (dam height of about 5ft) is very shallow due to accumulated sediment. The Lower Brockton Drive
Lake (dam height of about 14ft) discharges into a severely eroded plunge pool downstream of the dam which is followed
almost immediately by a box culvert beneath Brockton Drive.
3b.
List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property:
Total Estimated Acreage of Lake(s) surface area is 4.2 acres (0.5 acres for Upper and 3.7 acres for Lower Brockton Drive
Lake).
3c.
List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property:
928 If (704 If preceeding Upper Lake, 85 If through pipe in upper dam, 76 If through pipe in lower dam, 63 If following
lower dam)
3d.
Explain the purpose of the proposed project:
The primary purpose of the proposed project is to reduce flooding, protect Brockton Drive, and protect storage and
conveyance system structures and adjacent residences. Secondary purposes for the project include habitat enhancement
and improved aesthetics.
3e.
Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
The project involves protecting a 270 - foot -long earth embankment dam section with Roller Compacted Concrete (RCC)
overtopping protection, replacement of the lower lake drop inlet spillway, regrading (lowering) a 120 - foot -long earth
embankment dam section for upper lake dam, installing a culvert in the upper lake dam, constructing a 436- foot - length of
stream channel upstream of the upper lake dam, and repairing an eroded bank at the corner of the pool house platform.
The work includes, but is not limited to: RCC and concrete mix design, sediment removal and disposal, erosion control,
temporary stream diversion, removal of existing spillways, replacing existing riser /barrel spillways, grading /flattening
existing earth dams, installation of low -level outlet, construction of RCC overtopping protection, filter sand and drainage
pipe, grading, natural channel construction and plantings, and site restoration.
Equipment to be used includes cranes and earthwork and grading equipment such as trackhoes, dump trucks, and
loaders. In- stream structures will be placed using a trackhoe with a hydraulic thumb.
Page 3 of 13
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

4.
Jurisdictional Determinations
4a.
Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the
Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property /
project (including all prior phases) in the past?
Yes ❑ No Unknown
❑
Comments: DWQ visited the site on June 23, 2009 and
deemed the ponds and stream to be jurisdictional with no
separate wetlands.
4b.
If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination, what type
El Preliminary Final
of determination was made?
4c.
If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas?
Agency /Consultant Company: CDM Smith
Name (if known):
Other:
4d.
If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation.
5.
Project History
5a.
Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for
❑ Yes ® No ❑ Unknown
this project (including all prior phases) in the past?
5b.
If yes, explain in detail according to "help file" instructions.
6.
Future Project Plans
6a.
Is this a phased project?
❑ Yes ® No
6b.
If yes, explain.
Page 4 of 13
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

C. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
1a. Which sections were completed below for your project (check all that apply):
❑ Wetlands ® Streams - tributaries ® Buffers
® Open Waters ❑ Pond Construction
2. Wetland Impacts
If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted.
2a.
2b.
2c.
2d.
2e.
2f.
Wetland impact
Type of jurisdiction
number —
Type of impact
Type of wetland
Forested
(Corps - 404, 10
Area of impact
Permanent (P)
(if known)
DWQ — non -404, other)
(acres)
or Temporary
T
W1 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
W2 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
W3 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
W4 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
W5 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
W6 ❑ P FIT
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
2g. Total wetland impacts
2h. Comments:
3. Stream Impacts
If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this
question for all stream sites impacted.
3a.
3b.
3c.
3d.
3e.
3f.
3g.
Stream impact
Type of impact
Stream name
Perennial
Type of jurisdiction
Average
Impact
number -
(PER) or
(Corps - 404, 10
stream
length
Permanent (P)
intermittent
DWQ — non -404,
width
(linear
or Temporary
(INT)?
other)
(feet)
feet)
(T)
Concrete armoring of stilling
Unnamed
® PER
® Corps
S1 ®P ❑ T
basin downstream of lower
Tributary to
❑ INT
® DWQ
12
63 If
dam
Marsh Creek
Temporary Dewatering and
Unnamed
® PER
® Corps
S2 ❑ P ®T
construction of adjacent
Tributary to
❑ INT
® DWQ
6
75
pool deck stabilization
Marsh Creek
S3 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ PER
❑ Corps
❑ INT
❑ DWQ
S4 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ PER
❑ Corps
❑ INT
❑ DWQ
S5 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ PER
❑ Corps
❑ INT
❑ DWQ
S6 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ PER
❑ Corps
❑ INT
❑ DWQ
3h. Total stream and tributary impacts
138 If
3i. Comments: Armoring of stilling basin downstream of lower dam is required to maintain the structural integrity of the dam
Page 5 of 13
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

The project will add 436 linear feet of open stream channel to project site with conversion of upper pond to stream channel.
Estimated stream length on entire site including upsteam to Millbrook Road (not in limits of disturbance) is currently 928 linear
feet and will be 1,364 linear feet following construction.
4. Open Water Impacts
If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of
the U.S. then individually list all open water impacts below.
4a.
4b.
4c.
4d.
4e.
Open water
Name of waterbody
impact
(if applicable)
Type of impact
Waterbody type
Area of impact (acres)
number—
Permanent
(P) or
Temporary
T
01 ® P ❑
Excavation: removal of
0.84
T
Upper Brockton Drive Lake
impoundment, and restoration
Pond
to stream channel
Excavation: accu m ul ated
02 ® P ❑
Lower Brockton Drive Lake
sediment removal and
Pond
2.72
T
excavation of forebay area at
upstream end
03 ❑ P ®
Fill: temporary earthen
T
Lower Brockton Drive Lake
cofferdam to protect dam
Pond
0.33
construction
04 ® P ❑
Lower Brockton Drive Lake
Fill: reconstruction of lower
Pond
0.34
T
lake dam
4f. Total open water impacts
4.32*
4g. Comments: Impact 01 is required for maintenance and to improve flooding conditions of the upper pond in the residential
development.
Impacts 02 -04 are required to support maintenance of the lower lake and upper and lower dams.
*Total equals sum of 01 to 04 plus 05.
Impact 05 is the temporary installation of 3,399,9 sqft (0.08 ac) of riprap in the lower lake footprint for energy dissipation.
Open water impacts are shown on Figures 1 and 2, attached.
5. Pond or Lake Construction
If pond or lake construction proposed, then complete the chart below.
5a.
5b.
5c.
5d.
5e.
Wetland Impacts (acres)
Stream Impacts (feet)
Upland
Pond ID
Proposed use or purpose of pond
(acres)
number
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
Flooded
P1
P2
5f. Total
5g. Comments:
5h. Is a dam high hazard permit required?
❑ Yes ❑ No If yes, permit ID no:
5i. Expected pond surface area (acres):
5j. Size of pond watershed (acres):
5k. Method of construction:
Page 6 of 13
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

6. Buffer Impacts (for DWQ)
If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below. If yes, then individually list all buffer impacts
below. If any impacts require mitigation, then you MUST fill out Section D of this form.
6a.
® Neuse ❑ Tar - Pamlico ❑ Other:
Project is in which protected basin?
❑ Catawba ❑ Randleman
6b.
6c.
6d.
6e.
6f.
6g.
Buffer
impact
Reason for impact
Buffer
Zone 1 impact
Zone 2 impact
number —
Stream name
mitigation
(square feet)
(square feet)
Permanent
required?
(P) or
Temporary
T
Modification /protection
B1 ®P ❑
of pool deck corner
Unnamed Tributary to
❑ Yes
448.8 sq ft
-
T
platform with grouted
Marsh Creek
® No
riprap
Stream restoration
and lake bank
B2 ®P ❑
stabilization - shaping
Unnamed Tributary to
❑ Yes
13,435.5
-
T
of bed and banks and
Marsh Creek
® No
replanting of native
vegetation
Dam maintenance
and protection
B3 ❑ P ®
including armoring of
Unnamed Tributary to
❑ Yes
19,317.0
8,767.2
T
stilling basin and
Marsh Creek
® No
permanent access
road
6h. Total buffer impacts
B1 -B7: 89,350.0
26,021.2
6i. Comments:
Complete Buffer impacts table (131 -67) provided on following supplemental page (page 7a following this page).
Impacts 131 -67, except for B2 are required for maintenance of the existing structures, including the upper and lower lake dams
and pool deck.
Impact B2 is required to restore the upper pond area to a more naturally functioning channel and floodplain.
B4 buffer impact is the temporary disturbance of existing maintained cleared buffer for excavation and regrading to lower
elevation of upper pond dam. Existing vegetative conditions will be restored upon completion. Mitigation is not required. B4
Zone 1 impact = 9,601.9 sqft Zone 2 Impact = 5,406.2 sqft
B5 Buffer impact is the temporary disturbance of existing maintained cleared buffer for site access. Existing conditions will be
restored upon completion. Mitigation is not required. B5 Zone 1 impact = 40643.8 sqft Zone 2 impact = 11,847.8 sqft
B6 Buffer impact is the permanent conversion of buffer zone 1 to open water for lake bank stabilization and upper dam
modification. Mitigation is not required. B6 Zone 1 impact = 5,158.9 sqft
B7 Buffer impact is the permanent stabilization of drainage discharge outlets and culvert inlet/outlets with riprap. B7 Zone 1
impact = 744.1 sqft
Neuse Buffer impacts are shown on Figures 3 and 4, attached.
D. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
1 a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project.
The restoration of the pond to a stream will utilize natural channel design with placement of the stream to maximize the
restored riparian buffer consisting of native woody vegetation.
1 b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques.
A detailed construction sequence will be included in the plans to minimize impacts during construction. Sediment and erosion
control BMPs such as silt fence, pump around, diversion, cofferdam, and gravel construction entrances will be used to avoid
impacting water quality downstream. Revegetation will be required upon completion of construction.
Page 7 of 13
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

OA
m
i
a
u
u
m
C.
E
3
m
C
m
_a
C•.
u
U
07
.O
L
a
m
0
C
m
J
C
0
U
0
co
m
C
w
C.
C.
3
cG
_a
N V
N
N
oq
N
C Q Cr
l0
O
O
N .�.
W
lG
LLn
H
rl
N
O
_
V1
O
0)
oq
m
O
al m .�'
`'1
o6
qcr
00
M
H
M
d
N E
M
�
�
0
V
n
�
C
0 �
O
L
}+
L
m
Z
Z
Z
Z
Z
Z
Z
~
CO
E GJ
o-C
Y
t
Y
0 t Y
O L Y
O-1--
y
0 t Y
o
s
Y
IO £.
L
N Z
D
v
D3;
v
U
v
u
%%
U
O
L
"O N
M
L
v
N
C
+,
m
aCn O
3
o
=
m
c
�p
0
O N
O
C V)
U
Q
f0
Q
0
fC
N E
y
yj
"0
N
it
U U
E
E
R f0
C
N
C
y
C m
(B
.}'
L 'p
O
-0
f6
fa
"a
++
_0
C
v
u
-0
C
m
C
•0 a)
-a
C
C
O
C
w-
L Q
N
O
O
C
C
.N C.
O
X u
O
Q
++
Q
6
O
M
Y
t0
Q
w hD
m O
0
0
�'
v
m
o
o
o
Q-
3 o
n
C.
o
oo
+,
L
a
a`)
vi
E
hp
v
a-+
E
c
+'
0
m
-0
m
Q
n C
u x
C
a,
N
C
LO
C
0
'p
7 0
C w
CL
L
f6
,,
CA
C C
+'
m yj
0 N
C
w
cu
Q"
a
m
O>
V,
0
0 3
O
C
U
L
3
L CU
>
CU C
dA 0
3 U
Q
O
0
f 6
°
E>
c
C a,
,,, u
O
a�
O
fL0
•i
w
O
v
L
�
C
C .Q
ai 00
OD
N
&
a)
L
M
41
Q
p
p
L
o
C
ai
O
> CO
f0
C
C
L
Q
m
f0
6
O O
CL
N
O +'
M
0
3
>
o
R
—
O
U-
E
E
C
O
M
C
O
H
c�a
N
L
m
C
N 4-
w
N
_ 0
>
.L
>
t1. E
m
L
U
LL
Q
L
X
W
l0
w
U v
C
L L
�
r0 0 0
a
a
a
h
a
a
E a
L
a �
� L
"- C- E
m
m
m
m
m
m
m
CO §
Z

2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for impacts
to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State?
❑ Yes ® No
2b. If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply):
❑ DWQ ❑ Corps
2c. If yes, which mitigation option will be used for.this project?
❑ Mitigation bank
❑ Payment to in -lieu fee program
❑ Permittee Responsible Mitigation
3. Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank
3a. Name of Mitigation Bank:
3b. Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter)
Type
Quantity
3c. Comments:
4. Complete if Making a Payment to In -lieu Fee Program
4a. Approval letter from in -lieu fee program is attached.
❑ Yes
4b. Stream mitigation requested:
linear feet
4c. If using stream mitigation, stream temperature:
❑ warm ❑ cool ❑cold
4d. Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only):
square feet
4e. Riparian wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4f. Non - riparian wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4g. Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4h. Comments:
5. Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
5a. If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan.
6. Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) — required by DWQ
6a. Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires
buffer mitigation?
❑ Yes ® No
6b. If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation. Calculate the
amount of mitigation required.
Zone
6c.
Reason for impact
6d.
Total impact
(square feet)
Multiplier
6e.
Required mitigation
(square feet)
Zone 1
3 (2 for Catawba)
Zone 2
1.5
6f. Total buffer mitigation required:
6g. If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed {e.g., payment to private mitigation bank,
permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in -lieu fee fund).
Page 8 of 13
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

6h. Comments:
Page 9 of 13
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

E. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ)
1. Diffuse Flow Plan
1a. Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified
® Yes ❑ No
within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
1 b. If yes, then is a diffuse flow plan included? If no, explain why.
❑ Yes No
Comments: Stormwater discharges already exist.
2. Stormwater Management Plan
2a. What is the overall percent imperviousness of this project?
%
2b. Does this project require a Stormwater Management Plan?
❑ Yes ® No
2c. If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why: Buffers will be enhanced through the
conversion of a pond to a stream and only 441 sq ft of impervious area will be added by this project associated with
grouted riprap at the pool house deck modification immediately adjacent to the stream.
2d. If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan, then provide a brief, narrative description of the plan:
❑ Certified Local Government
2e. Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan?
❑ DWQ Stormwater Program
❑ DWQ 401 Unit
3. Certified Local Government Stormwater Review
3a. In which local government's jurisdiction is this project?
City of Raleigh
❑ Phase II
3b. Which of the following locally - implemented stormwater management programs
❑ NSW
❑ USMP
apply (check all that apply):
❑ Water Supply Watershed
❑ Other:
3c. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
❑ Yes ❑ No
attached?
4. DWQ Stormwater Program Review
❑ Coastal counties
❑ HQW
4a. Which of the following state - implemented stormwater management programs apply
❑ ORW
(check all that apply):
❑ Session Law 2006 -246
❑ Other:
4b. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
attached?
❑ Yes ❑ No
5. DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review
5a. Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements?
❑ Yes ❑ No
5b. Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met?
❑ Yes ❑ No
Page 10 of 13
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

F.
Supplementary Information
1.
Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement)
1a.
Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal /state /local) funds or the
® Yes
❑ No
use of public (federal /state) land?
1 b.
If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an
environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State
❑ Yes
® No
(North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
1 c.
If you answered "yes" to the above, has the document review been finalized by the
State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval
❑ Yes
❑ No
letter.)
Comments: N/A
2.
Violations (DWQ Requirement)
2a.
Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated
Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards,
❑ Yes
® No
or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)?
2b.
Is this an after - the -fact permit application?
❑ Yes
® No
2c.
If you answered "yes" to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s):
3.
Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement)
3a.
Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in
❑ Yes
® No
additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?
3b.
If you answered "yes" to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the
most recent DWQ policy. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
Project only provides maintenance of existing development and is expected to improve water quality.
4.
Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement)
4a.
Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non- discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from
the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
Wastewater will not be generated by the project. Sewer bypass pumping will be conducted to convey wastewater flows
while sewer piping is replaced.
Page 11 of 13
PCN Form —Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or
❑ Yes ® No
habitat?
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act
® Yes ❑ No
impacts?
® Raleigh
5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted.
❑ Asheville
5d. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical
Habitat?
Determination of impacts to endangered species or critical habitat was made through correspondence with the USFWS
Ecological Services Office following a preliminary review using USFWS online resources found at http://www.fws.gov/nc-
es /es /countyfr.html. The concurrence letter can be found in Attachment C.
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat?
❑ Yes ® No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat?
Based on review of the NMFS interactive website (http: // ocean. floridamarine .org /efh_coral /ims /viewer.htm), there is no
Essential Fish Habitat in the project area.
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal
governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation
® Yes ® No
status (e.g., National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in
North Carolina history and archaeology)?
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?
This project's disturbance area will be limited to a stream, lake, and two dams. No historic properties will be impacted.
Based on review of the NC State Historic Preservation Office's website ( http : / /www.hpo.dcr.state.nc.us), there are no
properties on the National Register of Historic Places in the project area. The project area does not contain cemeteries or
any known archaeological resources. A concurrence letter from SHPO can be found in Attachment C.
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA- designated 100 -year floodplain?
® Yes ❑ No
8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements: CDM Smith will submit a floodplain study to the City of Raleigh
demonstrating that the BFE is reduced upstream of the upper dam and not affected downstream. A FEMA LOMR
application will be submitted to the state to address the change in the floodplain extents.
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination? CDM Smith created a SWMM5 model based on input
from the City's final Marsh Creek hydrologic and hydraulic models. The SWMM5 model includes the Upper and Lower
Lakes upsteam of Brockton Drive and demonstrates the changes in the 100 -yr base flood elevation.
C,.ar-�w5nn
Date
Applicant/Agent's Si ature
Applicant/Agent's Printed Name
Page 12 of 13 }✓
PCN Form —Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

Attachment A
USGS Topographic Quad Map
Aerial Location Map

ti,s,MPARTMENTOFTHEINTEPUOR
U_s_GpAW=ALSURvEV
RALEiGp; EAST QLMIDIFLAINGLE
WOR CA*UM WNI -
oo
�7
ZZir.w.u.-
A. 5;,
%
1 lk
�3
6 F1:26000
I.-T TI.
RALEICH EASY. NC
R v pole
o il L99a

Attachment B
Property Deed Information
Parcels:
PIN
1716915985
1716917654
1716917986
1716925099
1716929030
1716937011
1726012812
1726021185
1726021235
1726021318
1726021564
1726021694
1726022785
1726022991
1726032180
1726032374

4
n A
lu ..a
orb
e tir1?- i
u
r
N
1716915985
I
� F
�J F�
.r,
Jl
s....
voll�
RAC . ua
p�FF['Wr�t I.D
a
ti
t 4
�rG 1
h
O.
a
1 ;00 400 Feet
PIN
1716915985
Real Estate ID
0123683
Map Name
171620
Owner
HOMPLACE ONE
CONDOMINIUM
Mailing Address 1
3334
HILLSBOROUGH ST
Mailing Address 2
RALEIGH NC
27607 -5405
Mailing Address 3
Deed Book
08114
Deed Page
0898
Deed Date
0713011998
Deeded Acreage
1.02
Assessed Building
Value
$0.00
Assessed Land Value
$0.00
Total Assessed Value
$0.00
Billing Class
Property Description
MASTER CARD
HOMEPLACE ONE
CONDO PH11
Heated Area
Site Address
4600 BROCKTON
DR
City
Raleigh
Township
NEUSE
Year Built
0
Total Sale Price
$91.750.00
Sale Date
713011998 12:00:00
AM
Type and Use
Design Style
Land Class
MA +CONDO
Old Parcel Number
409- 00000 -0489
pr nit
��?71 CAIl� j
WAKE
-
COUNTY
y170. rR CA lrell.l NA

V J9,
0001,
R;
N
171 6917654
0 100 200 400 Feet
7 '
'+ ,w.,,
}
m.b
Field V
Value
PIN 1
1716917654
Real Estate I© 0
0183532
Map Name 1
171620
Owner W
WARREN WILSON &
CO
Mailing Address 1 2
2441 MILBURNIE R❑
Mailing Address 2 R
RALEIGH NO
27610 -1760
Mailing Address 3
Deed Book 6
63416
Deed Page 0
0203
Deed Date 0
01115/1985
Deeded Acreage 0
0.23
Assessed Building $
$0.00
Assessed Land Value $
$29,900.00
Total Assessed Value $
$29,900.00
Billing Class C
CORPORATE
LISTING
Property Description L
LOTR SM PT PROP
WALDEN
DEVELOPMENT CO
TR3
Heated Area
Slte Address 0
0 BROCKTON DR
City R
Raleigh
Township N
NEUSE
Year Built 0
0
Total Sale Price $
$0.00
Sate Date
Type and Use
Design Style
Land Class V
VACANT
Old Parcel Number 4
409 -00000 -0712
CA WAKE
COUNTY
NORfIi t.AROJ 1N.h

ii�j
,i
A �• .
h .
ate`
4.
�y
r
r �a�
Nn
/V
1716917986
0 100 700 400 Feet
%'I
PJA
L�
Ile
Q'
le
Jt
PIN
1716917986
Real Estate ID
6110750
Map Name
171fi70
Owner
WARREN WILSON &
CO
Mailing Address 1
2441 MILBURNiE RD
Mailing Address 2
RALEIGH NC
27510 -1760
Mailing Address 3
Deed Book
03416
Deed Page
0203
Deed Date
01115/1985
Deeded Acreage
3 -33
Assessed Building
Value
$0.00
Assessed Land Value
$26,400 -00
Totai Assessed Value
$26,400.00
Billing Class
CORPORATE
LISTING
Property Description
TRS 4 &5 PROP OF
WALDEN DEV CO
Heated Area
Site Address
4512 BROCKTON
DR
City
Raleigh
Township
NEUSE
Year Built
0
Total Sale Prioe
$0 -00
Sale Date
Type and Use
Design Style
Land Class
VACANT
Old Parcel Number
409 -00000 -0435
,.dale
CAPO�
WAKE
COUNTY
N-Ok nl rA Rill ltla

3 ❑ Uy
■
�i �a(ticri, j� -nIZ ii D Q. w
Gil
fi~r
4
1
� g
N
/V
1716925099
0 100 200 400 Feet
tr
rjj
~~ y
4
4
�xtrOi
w�
PIN
1716925099
Real Estate ID
0123684
Map Name
171620
Owner
HOMEPLACE ONE
CONDOMINIUM
Mailing Address 1
4400 FALLS OF
NEUSE RD STE 203
Mailing Address 2
RALEIGH INC
27609 -2507
Mailing Address 3
Deed Book
08114
Deed Page
0898
Deed Date
07/30/1998
Deeded Acreage
1.02
Assessed Building
Value
$0.00
Assessed Land Value
$0 -00
Total Assessed Value
$0.00
Billing Class
Property Description
MASTER CARD
HOMEPLACE ONE
CONDO PH12
Heated Area
Site Address
4604 BROCKTON
DR
City
Raleigh
Township
NEUSE
Year Built
0
Total Sale Price
$0.00
Sale Date
Type and Use
Design Style
Land Class
MA +CONDO
Old Parcel Number
409 - 00000 -0490
7f CA WAKE
COUNTY
1011 Fit CARUI I " A

F
'j,
�... s• [;red
YEo`�
L q
d
r
d
E
F
f
,kaki
iI
er• �, � I '�I '
1716929030
ltl.
0 100 200 403 Feet
PIN
1716929030
Real Estate ID
0110751
Map Name
171620
Owner
WARREN WILSON &
CO
Mailing Address 1
2441 MILBt1RNIE RD
Mailing Address 2
RALEIGH NC
27610 -1760
Mailing Address 3
Deed Book
03416
Deed Page
0203
Deed Date
01/1511985
Deeded Acreage
0.43
Assessed Building
Value
50 -00
Assessed Land Value
$5,590.00
Total Assessed Value
$5,59000
Billing Class
CORPORATE
LISTING
Property Description
LOTR SM PT PROP
WALDEN
DEVELOPMENT CO
TR3
Heated Area
Site Address
4525 HOYLE DR
City
Raleigh
Township
NEUSE
Year Built
0
Total Sale Price
$0.00
Sale Date
Type and Use
Design Style
Land Class
VACANT
Old Parcel Number
409 - 00000 -0436
QF �-
A+1 CAN WAKI
COUNTY
nf14Lrli r'AI:[1l1idA

1716937911
n 100 200 400 Fee;
PIN
1716937011
Real Estate ID
0111156
Map Name
171616
Owner
WALDEN WORDS
CONDOMINIUMS
Mailing Address 1
4754 WALDEN
POND OR
Mailing Address 2
RALEIGH INC
27804 -2707
Mailing Address 3
Deed Book
02490
Deed Page
0232
Deed Date
01/09/1977
Deeded Acreage
2208 .
Assessed Building
Value
$0-00
Assessed Land Value
$0.00
Total Assessed Value
$0.00
Billing Class
Property Description
AUTH OF NC
GENERAL STATUES
Pleated Area
218154
Site Address
4801 WALENDA DR
City
Raleigh
Township
NEUSE
Year Built
1973
Total Sale Prioe
$0.00
Sale Date
Type and Use
Club House
Design Styie
Land Class
MA +CONDO
Old Parcel Number
409 -00000 -0000
o�
'S�r cnva�' Y YAKf
COUNTY
,'If: I : f'.1 l: LII I ;w%

!Z-
s
'• -•.,tea
- sjl ti•
C:
N .ti
�fG
�0
��n
1726012812
i:0 200 400 Feet
��
w
s�
too,�I
A� Ile
^r O.
Fj
eSR�
4 k�'
��
PIN
1726012812
Real Estate ID
0117202
Map Name
172617
Owner
GREEN PARK
TOWNES
HOMEOWNERS
ASSOC INC
Mailing Address 1
PO BOX 2021
Mailing Address 2
RALEIGH NC
27602.2021
Mailing Address 3
Deed Book
08787
Deed Page
2717
Deed Date
0112612001
Deeded Acreage
4.37
Assessed Building
Value
S0 -00
Assessed Land Value
$240 -00
Total Assessed Value
$240 -00
Billing Class
Property Description
COS GREENPARK
TOVNJES
BM2000 -00215
Heated Area
Site Address
4505 HOYLE DR
City
Raleigh
Township
NEUSE
Year Built
0
Total Sale Price
$0 -00
Sale Date
Type and Use
Design Style
Land Class
HOMEOWNERS
ASSOC.
Old Parcel Number
409 - 00000.0474
OF
WAKE
COUNTY
YUR n•E cauoi -E RA

p
-44
WA
C�Ffi y
K
V
f
N
1726021185
C>
X.
0 100 200 400 Feet
\I.
f
d
.�
4�
4r.
f
r�
PIN
1726021185
Real Estate I❑
0127692
Map Name
172617
Owner
HOMEP LACE ONE
CONDOMINIUM
Mailing Address 1
4400 FALLS OF
NEt1SE RD STE 203
Mailing Address 2
RALEIGH INC
27609 -2507
Mailing Address 3
Deed Book
08114
Deed Page
0898
Dead Date
0713011998
Deeded Acreage
0.86
Assessed Building
Value
$0.00
Assessed Land Value
$0.00
Total Assessed Value
$0.00
Billing Class
Property Description
MASTER CARD
HOMEP LACE ONE
CONDO PH2
Heated Area
Site Address
4713 MATT DR
City
Raleigh
Township
NELISE
Year Built
❑
Total Sale Price
$204,500-00
Sale Date
1111511983 12:00:00
AM
Type and Use
Design Style
Land Class
MA+CONDO
Old Parcel Number
409 -00000 -0536
I OF
tl_v, W
WADE
COUNTY
.. ns�r �•.. rni iun

mil �� � y �• � ,'y ._ .
H �r
k
I
1
`4y �2it 4?r
rj
4.
a.
f
2.
br
Rai
•r❑ ti.
4 �
1726021235
❑ 100 200 400 Feet
PJN
1728021235
Real Estate ID
0127693
Map Name
172817
Owner
HOMEP LACE ONE
CONDOMINIUM
Mailing Address 1
4400 FALLS OF
NEUSE RD STE 203
Mailing Address 2
RALEIGH NC
27509.2507
Mailing Address 3
Deed Book
08114
Deed Page
0898
Deed Date
07130/1998
Deeded Acreage
0.93
Assessed Building
Value
$43.00
Assessed Land Value
$0.00
Total Assessed Value
$0.00
Billing Class
Property Description
MASTER CARD
HOMEPLACE ONE
CONDO PH1
Heated Area
Site Address
4717 MATT DR
City
Raleigh
Township
NEUSE
Year Built
❑
Total Sale Price
$78,500.00
Sale Date
9/1411998 12:00:00
AM
Type and Use
Design Style
Land Class
MA +CONDO
Old Parcel Number
4439-43043043 -0537
6F Fy4�
■ ■ALLE
COUNTY
�c IN II, f IRCII IN �

a
a
s ��k`�un'l'pRtl.Cifi
M1� fir"
7-1/ ---,/
ti.
a :9,,
_.:b.'
T
I�
N
�o
1726021318
0U 20D 400 Feet
ti
1
f
�o£�iL err
Ile-
T
Z.
parNL'7Jj[ �i'1r - -•
3.
PIN
1726021318
Real Estate I❑
0127694
Map Name
172617
Owner
HINTON. CHARLES
A WHITLEY, DAVID
P
Mailing Address 1
1109 GREENLEA DR
Mailing Address 2
APEX NC
27523 -6501
Mailing Address 3
Deed Book
11072
Dead Page
2263
Deed Date
10!2612004
Deeded Acreage
0.69
Assessed Building
Value
$272,348.00
Assessed Land Value
$56,000.00
Total Assessed Value
$328,348 -00
Billing Class
INDIVIDUAL
Property Descripton
L06 HOMEPLACE
SQUARE 83 -Ml
PH1 SE2
Heated Area
4121
Site Address
4721 MATT DR
city
Raleigh
Township
NEUSE
Year Built
1983
Total Sale Price
$295,000 -00
Sale Date
10/26/2004 12:00:00
AM
Type and Use
Fwr Family
Design Style
Conventional
Land Class
RESIDENCE — 10
ACRES -HOME SITE
Old Parcel Number
409 -00000 -0538
W
CR WAKE
COUNTY
xnr;nr rarer,wa

PIN 1726021564
ji
{teal Estate ID 0127695
Map Name 172613
Owner 00, MINH & TINA M
k - LEE
'w Mailing Address 1 7517 PATS BRANCH
DR
Mailing Address 2 RALEIGH NC
27892 -7320
Mailing Address 3
Deed Book 09292
Deed Page 0837
Deed Date 02114!2002
Deeded Acreage 0.63
y: ' •k:,- :•2� �:. ,= � � - Assessed Building $272,348.00
` •. ry Value
Assessed Land Value $58,000.00
Total Assessed Value $328,348.00
f.M -�'• Billing Class INDIVIDUAL
Property Description L07 HOMEPLACE
ITS
\ SQUARE 83 -561
-�� PHI SE2
L� Heated Area 4121
f Site Address 4725 MATT DR
City Raleigh
�a ' �•, i . Township NEUSE
Year Built 1983
apt. Total Sale Price $285,000 -00
,R. Sale Date 2/14/2002 12:00:00
�L AM
Type and Use Four Family
Design Style Conventional
Land Class RESIDENCE -< 10
�j ACRES -HOME SITE
/ Old Parcel Number 409 -00000 -0539
uca�
s�
1726021564 _
{ OF AqJ„
Cl 100 200 400 Feet �O y C y AM
COUNTY
a�nprt•t r:nxrn iMa

--.,Y
,,
�+- -�
.::
`
�Or �
w
1
>
N �
rv- s
O
1726021694
0 1 0 20.7 400 Feet
PIN
1726021694
Real Estate I D
0127696
Map Name
172613
DWner
SMITH, PRISCILLA
a
Mailing Address 1
4616 KILCLJLLEN DR
APT A
Mailing Address 2
RALEIGH NC
27604 -9087
Mailing Address 3
Deed Book
09583
Deed Page
1248
Deed Date
0 910 512 0 0 2
Deeded Acreage
0.68
Assessed Building
Value
$272,348.00
Assessed Land Value
$56.000.00
Total Assessed Val ua
$328,348.00
Billing Class
INDIVIDUAL
Property Description
L08 HOMEPLACE
SQUARE 83 -581
PH1 SE2
Heated Area
4121
Site Address
4729 MATT DR
City
Raleigh
Township
NEUSE
Year Built
1983
Total Sale Price
$278,000.00
Sale Date
915/2002 12:00:00
AM
Type and Use
Four Family
Design Style
Conventional
Land Class
RESIDENCE- 10
ACRES -HOME SITE
Old Parcef Number
409 -00000 -0540
W�e"
• • 1 KI
COUNTY
N[lltnI CAR 01 IN%

PIN 1726022785
k Real Estate I ❑ 0127697
" w
fitir? ia. Clx Map Name 172613
+a Owner HOMEPLACE ONE
K
_ -
CONDOMINIUM
t i ��"'� Mailing Address i 4400 FALLS OF
NEUSE RD STE 203
Mailing Address 2 RALEIGH NC
27609 -2507
Mailing Address 3
f4 y Deed Book 08114
1► �VVt Deed Page 0898
Deed Date 0713011998
Deeded Acreage 0.74
y.. Assessed Building $0 -D0
" 4e Value
�``• Assessed Land Value $0.00
Total Assessed Value $0.00
}li Billing Class
Property Description MASTER CARD
HOMEPLACE ONE
t' CONDO PH9
Heated Area
�� `• x 4' Site Address 4733 MATT 1DR
- City Raleigh
Township NEiiSE
�..,
Year Built 0
Total Sale Price $190,000.00
a, F Sale Date 12/29/1983 12:00:00
S�
AM
1.0- y Type and Use
4
Design Style
Land Class MA +CONDO
Old Parcel Number 409-00000 -0541
Parfnild�'e.�jY
N
rp
-5
1726022785
0 100 20 400 Feet ► AWE
ry cnKu
COUNTY

'j,
r..
1
l', 11 ti
kd 0 Y
�att�_r
f
porn t7JIr: •F]�
N e
1726022991
400 Feet
PIN
1726022991
Real Estate ID
0130843
Map Name
172613
Owner
BERRYANN,
KENNETH W JR &
KAREN H
Mailing Address 1
532 CLIFTON BLUE
ST
Mailing Address 2
WAKE FOREST NC
27587 -8175
Mailing Address 3
Deed Book
10355
Deed Page
1735
Deed Date
08117!2003
Deeded Acreage
0 68
Assessed Building
Value
$257,895 "00
Assessed Land Value
$56,000.00
Total Assessed Value
$313,895.00
Billing Class
INDIVIDUAL
Property Description
L022 RV
HOMEPLACE
SQUARE PH2
BM1984 -00009
Heated Area
4121
Site Address
4713 H0LLOWEILL
LN
City
Raleigh
Township
NEUSE
Year Built
1983
Total Sale Price
$285,000 "06
Sale Date
8/1112003 12:00:00
AM
Type and Use
Four Family
Design Style
Conventional
Land Glass
RESIDENCE - 10
ACRES -HOME SITE
Old Parcel Number
409 - 00000 -0601 �t
i
z
2r
°_sap J
--
WAKE
COUNTY
WOO I'lI CIAO -11 I Kr4

- }
y - r
� n
u
J-j I�rifzCl Or. ` °,a 4- y
ir
w
y
�bf
a�° LJr
�> %r.Za
17 IfiiL'J!IF �*
— —L —
1726032180
0 100 200 400 Feet
Field
Vale
PIN
1726032180
Real Estate 0
0130844
Map Name
172613
Owner
GARBOW, KELLIE J
Mailing Address 1
32940 MISTY LN
Mailing Address 2
DELAND FL
32720.6185
Mailing Address 3
Deed Book
05551
Deed Page
0534
Deed Date
0313111993
Deeded Acreage
0.86
Assessed Building
Value
$275,179.60
Assessed Land Value
$56,000 -00
Total Assessed Value
$331,179 -00
Billing Class
INDIVIDUAL
Property Description
L023 RV
HOMEPLACE
SQUARE PH2
BMI984 -60009
Heated Area
4121
Site Address
4712 HOLLOWELL
LN
City
Raleigh
Township
NEUSE
Year Built
1983
Total Sale Price
$187,000.00
Sale Date
3131/1993 12:00:00
AM
Type and Use
Four Family
Design Style
Conventional
Land Class
RESIDENCE- 10
ACRES -HOME SITE
Old Parcel Number
409. 00000 -0602
3
WASE
COUNTY
bAN M (.A r1A)I I NA

x
C�
•wry. �,
J,j
I pitdDr
G�(_ °�'ed>' >rra
N, f14
t t-r []r-
P2
r z,
1726032374
} 900 200 400 Feet
PIN
1726032374
Real Estate ID
0132796
Map Name
172613
Owner
SAWYER. ROBERT
B & CYNTHIA 3
Mailing Address 1
5117 MAKENA DR
Mailing Address 2
RALEIGH INC
27615 -1691
Mailing Address 3
Deed Book
06575
Deed Page
0859
Deed Date
0612811995
Deeded Acreage
0 -75
Assessed Building
Value
$273,009.00
Assessed Land Value
$56,000.00
Total Assessed Value
$329,009.00
Silting Class
INDIVIDUAL
Property Description
L030 HOMEPLACE
SQUARE PH3
BM1984 -00240
Heated Area
4121
Site Address
4713 COURTSIDE
PL
City
Raleigh
Township
NEUSE
Year Built
1984
Total Sale Price
$211,500.00
Sate Date
6119/1984 12:00:00
AM
Type and Use
Four Family
Design Style
Conventional
Land Class
RESIDENCE -< 10
ACRES -HOME SITE
Old Parcel Number
409 -00000 -0609
WADE
COUNTY
Knit n i r-,� rtn i� v a

Attachment C
Letter from FWS
Letter from SHPO

United States Department of the Interior
a�
' FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE
Raleigh Field office
Post Office Box 33726
RCH 3 A Raleigh, North Carolina 27636 -3726
June 1, 2010
Robert Hopper, III, P.E.
CDM
5400 Glenwood Avenue, Suite 300
Raleigh, NC 27612
Re: City of Raleigh- Brockton Drive Lake and Dam Project
Dear Mr. Hopper:
This letter is to inform you that a list of all federally- protected endangered and threatened species
with known occurrences in Notch Carolina is now available on the U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service's (Service) web page at littp: / /www.fws.gov /raleigli. Therefore, if you have projects that
occur within the Raleigh Field Office's area of responsibility (see attached county list), you no
longer need to contact the Raleigh Field Office for a list of federally - protected species.
Our web page contains a complete and frequently updated list of all endangered and threatened
species protected by the provisions of the Endangered Species Act of 1973, as amended (16
U.S.C. 1531 et seq. )(Act), and a list of federal species of concerns that are known to occur in
each county in North Carolina_
Section 7 of the Act requires that all federal agencies (or their designated non - federal
representative), in consultation with the Service, insure that ally action federally authorized,
funded, or carried out by such agencies is not likely to jeopardize the continued existence of any
federally - listed endangered or threatened species. A biological assessment or evaluation may be
prepared to fulfill that requirement and in determining whether additional consultation with the
Service is necessary. In addition to the federally - protected species list, information on the
species' life histories and habitats and information on completing a Biological assessment or
evaluation and can be found on our web page at http: / /www.fws.gov /raleilgh. Please check the
web site often for updated information or changes.
I The term "Federal species of concert" refers to those species which the Service believes might. be in need of
concentrated conservation actions. Federal species of concern receive no legal protection and their designation does
not necessarily imply that the species will eventually be proposed for listing as a federally endangered or threatened
species. However, we recontntend that all practicable measures be taken to avoid or minimize adverse impacts to
federal species of concern.

If your project contains suitable habitat for any of the federally- listed species known to be
present within the county where your project occurs, the proposed action has the potential to
adversely affect those species. As such, we recommend that surveys be conducted to determine
the species' presence or absence within the project area. The use of North Carolina Natural
Heritage program data should not be substituted for actual field surveys.
If you determine that the proposed action may affect (i.e., likely to adversely affect or not likely
to adversely affect) a federally- protected species, you should notify this office with your
determination, the results of your surveys, survey methodologies, and an analysis of the effects
of the action on listed species, including consideration of direct, indirect, and cumulative effects,
before conducting any activities that might affect the species. If you determine that the proposed
action will have no effect (i.e., no beneficial or adverse, direct or indirect effect) on federally
listed species, then you are not required to contact our office for concurrence (unless an
Environmental Impact Statement is prepared). However, you should maintain a complete record
of the assessment, including steps leading to your determination of effect, the qualified personnel
conducting the assessment, habitat conditions, site photographs, and any other related articles.
With regard to the above - referenced project, we offer the following remarks. Our comments are
submitted pursuant to, and in accordance with, provisions of the Endangered Species Act.
Based on the information provided and other information available, it appears that the proposed
action is not likely to adversely affect any federally- listed endangered or threatened species, their
formally designated critical habitat, or species currently proposed for listing under the Act at
these sites. We believe that the requirements of section 7(a)(2) of the Act have been satisfied for
your project. Please remember that obligations under section 7 consultation must be
reconsidered if: (1) new information reveals impacts of this identified action that may affect
listed species or critical habitat in a manner not previously considered; (2) this action is
subsequently modified in a manner that was not considered in this review; or, (3) a new species
is listed or critical habitat determined that may be affected by the identified action.
However, the Service is concerned about the potential impacts the proposed action might have
on aquatic species. Aquatic resources are highly susceptible to sedimentation. Therefore, we
recommend that all practicable measures be taken to avoid adverse impacts to aquatic species,
including implementing directional boring methods and stringent sediment and erosion control
measures. An erosion and sedimentation control plan should be submitted to and approved by
the North Carolina Division of Land Resources, Land Quality Section prior to construction.
Erosion and sedimentation controls should be installed and maintained between the construction
site and any nearby down - gradient surface waters. In addition, we recommend maintaining
natural, vegetated buffers on all streams and creeks adjacent to the project site.
The North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission has developed a Guidance Memorandum (a
copy can be found on our website at (http: / /www.fws.gov /raleigh) to address and mitigate
secondary and cumulative impacts to aquatic and terrestrial wildlife resources and water quality.
We recommend that you consider this document in the development of your projects and in
completing an initiation package for consultation (if necessary).
2

We hope you find our web page useful and informative and that following the process described
above will reduce the time required, and eliminate the need, for general correspondence for
species' lists. If you have any questions or comments, please contact Mark Bowers of this office
at (919) 856 -4520 ext. 19.
Sincerely,
Pete Benjamin
Field Supervisor

North Carolina Department of Cultural Resources
State Historic Preservation Office
Peter B. Sandbeck, Administrator
Office of Archives and History
Division of Historical Resources
David Brook, Director
Beverly Eaves Perdue, Governor
Linda A, Carlisle, Secretary
Jeffrey J. Crow, Deputy Secretary
May 27, 2010
Robert Hopper, III
Camp Dresser & McKee
5400 Glenwood Avenue
Suite 300
Raleigh, NC 27612
Re: City of Raleigh Brockton Drive Lake and Dam Project, Wake County, ER 10 -0910
Dear Mr. Hopper:
Thank you for your letter of May 17, 2010, concerning the above project.
We have conducted a review of the project and are aware of no historic resources which would be affected by
the project. Therefore, we have no comment on the project as proposed.
The above comments are made pursuant to Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act and the
Advisory Council on Historic Preservation's Regulations for Compliance with Section 106 codified at 36 CFR
Pitt 800.
Thank you for your cooperation and consideration. If you have questions concerning the above comment,
please contact Renee Gledhill- Earley, environmental review coordinator, at 919- 807 -6579. In all future
communication concerning this project, please cite the above - referenced tracking number.
Sincerely, %--8
�Jeter Sandbeck
Location; 109 Bast Jones Street, Raleigh NC 27601 Mailing Address: 4617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh NC 27699 -4617 Telephone /Fax: (919) 807 - 65701807 -6599

Attachment D
Impact Area Figures
Figure 1404/401 Impacts Lower Lake
Figure 2 404/401 Impacts Upper Lake
Figure 3 401 and Neuse Riparian Buffer Impacts Lower Lake
Figure 4 401 and Neuse Riparian Buffer Impacts Upper Lake

X
O
m
y
U
w
U
y
U
J
U
°
z
Q
w
U
w
D
O
m
m
Q) z
0)
a cn
E L�j
w D
M
O ft�
(n L�i r
~ Ln Q
a- N
� � U
N W
Li
W O cn
(n N
m _
I �
Z N (L
Cn Q) cn
x E
w
U
Z W
cn CY Cr
W
° W a-
n
w W
CO O =
`t w
N
Q
°
° o m
U � �
u >
6 W
U cn
Q
� p W J
X J W
°
u
I
O
z
O
Q
N_
CY
O
Q
z
w
ry
w
O
U
w
O
ry
w
ry
w
O
z
Q
w
O
w
ry
Q
m
ry
O
w
J
O
SA
u
i
i
1
WE
y�
7
�i
7
I
no
rGra
Psii
�i
ti
u
n
u
w
1
No
No
P
i
.z
°w
w-5
>D
w U
O
Cn
w°
mw
(f) cn
I--w
CD ~
Cr
J cn
J
Qz
w
U
Cn O
°
� w
° O
U
M W
O
N
Cy

w
O
w
D
O
w
Q) z
0)
a cn
E L�j
w D
(-p m
z � �
� � Q
W N �
°
N W J
Q
°-
75; Q
\ w
N
W
Cn .. w
Q Q) cn
m E
I � �
CD O
z W
cn
� o
ry m
X
w w
W
w W
CO O =
rq _
`t w
N
Q
°
° o w
O Q
u >
6 W
U cn
Q
� p W J
X J
°
u
W
O
z
O
Q
N_
CY
O
Q
z
w
ry
w
O
v
w
O
ry
w
ry
w
O
z
Q
w
O
W
ry
Q
w
ry
O
w
J
O
SA
u
i
i
1
WE
y�
7
�i
7
I
no
Psii
G
r
�i
ti
G
u
i
n
u
T
w
1
n
No
�i
No
i

t
G
a o
i
N
0
0
m �
o
w
Yso�
t
1 f
�2111Y -
s f �� Al
R�� "s I p M4 1 DAM ILIPROVPMOM -
y(m�'cg (5,270.4 SWFT)
s �
T �
:S
1
at* —\ _,-- _ 1513
l
l
� h
�'b •C� C. lq
yng'gp at;3 ,S
� dJ
A
,,l n
NEUSE RIPARIAN BUFFER TONE I UMn
3NF715E PoPNiIAH BUFFER ZONE 2 L1MR5
l
ACS
S w-r)
II
DESCRIPHOH
31 (GLB LFr
1,4 IN, �
LOWER
01
TEMPORARY ACCESS AND STAGM.
Bad -I2 {4213.5 SOFT]
CONVERSION OF POND TO STREAM
TEMPORARY ACCESS AND STAGYIC—,
BU -I1 (2173.6 SOFT]
DWAVATKX4: LAKE
HLL
SEDIMENT REMOVAL
a
oMrz { , soFr
ZH15 Sa11
zaa a
�
_tax
03
FILL
57
TEMPORARY
1 f
�2111Y -
s f �� Al
R�� "s I p M4 1 DAM ILIPROVPMOM -
y(m�'cg (5,270.4 SWFT)
s �
T �
:S
1
at* —\ _,-- _ 1513
l
l
� h
�'b •C� C. lq
yng'gp at;3 ,S
� dJ
A
,,l n
NEUSE RIPARIAN BUFFER TONE I UMn
3NF715E PoPNiIAH BUFFER ZONE 2 L1MR5
l
ACS
S w-r)
II
DESCRIPHOH
i
_
LOWER
01
LAKE
CONVERSION OF POND TO STREAM
FIG
DWAVATKX4: LAKE
HLL
SEDIMENT REMOVAL
iiSl
1 f
�2111Y -
s f �� Al
R�� "s I p M4 1 DAM ILIPROVPMOM -
y(m�'cg (5,270.4 SWFT)
s �
T �
:S
1
at* —\ _,-- _ 1513
l
l
� h
�'b •C� C. lq
yng'gp at;3 ,S
� dJ
A
,,l n
NEUSE RIPARIAN BUFFER TONE I UMn
3NF715E PoPNiIAH BUFFER ZONE 2 L1MR5
l
ACS
S w-r)
fl
211 TEMPORARY A
0*42 (4,1358
,;m11 TEWPOFW?Y AC=
IJrp�•N 0�-
1`14L, TnV
t• FT • � � � �y $ 38 `VtYJ l\
0DIFFERDAM 14 h laf3
oMS
/X\
OR
0.33 AC]
✓om hq
- ---- - - - - -- N�
rs21
red i R
_ fird _ 8f
rNrNr
-��` red � 1
TAftl! I STEFAIA INWACRl3NO9HS '
pCh- 21(1114 E lOFij
STREAAIIMPAR S�*N ON uNEiR
NUMBER IMPACT TTP! 0!3[11 R1TION SKLT FiET
WHC1t[T2
OE%NEb BT: R. HOPPER
DRS Smith
6HEE7 CNR'O 07 R. NALEL
CROSS CN6.0 RY
APPRVIEo w- 5 01 m N ...5W =
REV. DATE DR1N3 CRI(D RE6wjms D61E WT 2013 NC 4h. NQ 2M121 T41. 4919) 149E-3g2P
BROCKTON
DESCRIPHOH
DRIVE
_
LOWER
01
LAKE
CONVERSION OF POND TO STREAM
FIG
DWAVATKX4: LAKE
HLL
SEDIMENT REMOVAL
iiSl
oMrz { , soFr
2
OR 2.72 72 A A C}
1.72
M1111TINNGA"
03
fl
211 TEMPORARY A
0*42 (4,1358
,;m11 TEWPOFW?Y AC=
IJrp�•N 0�-
1`14L, TnV
t• FT • � � � �y $ 38 `VtYJ l\
0DIFFERDAM 14 h laf3
oMS
/X\
OR
0.33 AC]
✓om hq
- ---- - - - - -- N�
rs21
red i R
_ fird _ 8f
rNrNr
-��` red � 1
TAftl! I STEFAIA INWACRl3NO9HS '
pCh- 21(1114 E lOFij
STREAAIIMPAR S�*N ON uNEiR
NUMBER IMPACT TTP! 0!3[11 R1TION SKLT FiET
WHC1t[T2
OE%NEb BT: R. HOPPER
DRS Smith
6HEE7 CNR'O 07 R. NALEL
CROSS CN6.0 RY
APPRVIEo w- 5 01 m N ...5W =
REV. DATE DR1N3 CRI(D RE6wjms D61E WT 2013 NC 4h. NQ 2M121 T41. 4919) 149E-3g2P
IMPACTNUWER
IMPACTTWE
DESCRIPHOH
SHOWN
ON
SFEET
16996[7
AREA
IACRES1
IMPACT
RREAIS41
FT}
01
INIPA CT
CONVERSION OF POND TO STREAM
FIG
51
HLL
B49N
iiSl
vA
FIG11
1.72
M1111TINNGA"
03
FILL
57
TEMPORARY
C.NsTAUcnoN OT
4932
75
FILL
DAMMAINTENANCE
POOLOIVS
D.34
150119
OS
TEMPORARY FILL
STA6UZATIOIN
FIO-1
0.00
IMPACTNUWER
IMPACTTWE
DESCRIPHOH
SHOWN
ON
SFEET
16996[7
AREA
IACRES1
IMPACT
RREAIS41
FT}
01
EXCAVATION
CONVERSION OF POND TO STREAM
FIG
a09
36759
07
EKCAVATON
SEDIMENT REMOVAL LOWER LANE
FIG11
1.72
llBfi42.9
03
FILL
TEMPORARY COFFERDAM
FICA
0.33
141771
04
FILL
DAMMAINTENANCE
FI&I
D.34
150119
OS
TEMPORARY FILL
7EMPONARv RIPRAP ENERGYOIS$IPArON
FIO-1
0.00
3 9.9
TOTAL
1
9.37
1R7.N6
L �
s.
TABLE 3- HEUSL i'UNI R IMPACT AREAS
CITY OF RALEIGH
41 W atet NORTH CAROLINA
BROCKTON DRIVE LAKE AND DAM PROJECT
SM- 2011 -005 1
S
f
\ 1 a,�
SIX E 74 o Ja eta
[KSiPATK]N SEE F1GLIRE i �
y�d�
?TTY
i
1' 40'
I Cl
LEGEND
mEma- &
RR2 -- NEUSE BUFFER ION[ 2 UU TS
. . L]MrTs OF CONNSTRUGTION
OPEN WATER WUNFYRT
............... STREAM OWN BOUNDARY
=ITM ACT N NOTFFIGITION {FtiN}
R IFPL3CATION IMPACT ARV TV
S1 STREAM IMPACT AREA
Owl OPEN WATER IMPACT AREA
61 -m RIPARIAN BUFFER ZONE 1 IMPACr AREA
B1 -I2 RIPARIAN BUFFER ZONE 2 IMPACT AREA
14UI4BER (1) FOLLAMNC IMPACT TYPE ABEARDUTION
[S OW, AND B1 REFERS TO IMPACT NUMBER LISTED
N PCNN PERMIY APPUr ATION
NEUSE BUFFERS WM FROM SURYETID EDGE OF
BANKS.
PROJECT NO- 6679 -71614
FRE NANAE: FIGURE 3.O C,
FIGURE 3 - NEUSE RIPARIAN BUFFER IMPACT AREAS I SHEET HG.
LOWER LAKE FIG -3
RFLSE LO1iER EARAtTA><64 i3413AA1: FCTj
6JFFEF
INTACT
M1IIMAEF
SUWRi
511CY.Ri CPC
W. BT
2aCEi
396A9FA
SORE2
A4
91 R6F
2Ox! L
26xI x
51
AL
FIG-4
u A
44U
A2
Ag
T16r
9 s
VIP
5916
63
33319
LU33B
55
539
Fi"
19317
05b
31Ph5
03C
M70.3
056
21715
Az"
2LSLa5
1I96Qi
54
FIW
)4662
53052
s3
Bab
FIB
410.7
76D19
53961
B!
FIGS
2n33e -A
Do
FIW
751152
DIC
FN7-A
23514
USI-5
I'M
FIW
1317 -1
B Y
FI GS
LW L2
65
PoI
FIW
533.5
63!
FIGS
777.2
651,
FIGS
LLIM5
Po:
FIGS
39537
4335
Poi
FIW
ADA1
e3k
FIW
5677A
52673
-05.438
CL547A
66
66
fIGS
SL709
9L56.9
A7
A7
Fl6C
7S•I
O
Tmat
9%rJ9A
56
CITY OF RALEIGH
41 W atet NORTH CAROLINA
BROCKTON DRIVE LAKE AND DAM PROJECT
SM- 2011 -005 1
S
f
\ 1 a,�
SIX E 74 o Ja eta
[KSiPATK]N SEE F1GLIRE i �
y�d�
?TTY
i
1' 40'
I Cl
LEGEND
mEma- &
RR2 -- NEUSE BUFFER ION[ 2 UU TS
. . L]MrTs OF CONNSTRUGTION
OPEN WATER WUNFYRT
............... STREAM OWN BOUNDARY
=ITM ACT N NOTFFIGITION {FtiN}
R IFPL3CATION IMPACT ARV TV
S1 STREAM IMPACT AREA
Owl OPEN WATER IMPACT AREA
61 -m RIPARIAN BUFFER ZONE 1 IMPACr AREA
B1 -I2 RIPARIAN BUFFER ZONE 2 IMPACT AREA
14UI4BER (1) FOLLAMNC IMPACT TYPE ABEARDUTION
[S OW, AND B1 REFERS TO IMPACT NUMBER LISTED
N PCNN PERMIY APPUr ATION
NEUSE BUFFERS WM FROM SURYETID EDGE OF
BANKS.
PROJECT NO- 6679 -71614
FRE NANAE: FIGURE 3.O C,
FIGURE 3 - NEUSE RIPARIAN BUFFER IMPACT AREAS I SHEET HG.
LOWER LAKE FIG -3

U
0
T
G
4
3
a
y S
V
V
A.
m
L
BAFi( srAee.wnoF+
B2b-Z1 [3641 SOM
ORGUrED RIPRAP
BANN SrABMLITA710N f
81 -21 [448.6 9GFi}
STREAM RESTORATION
a2c -Zl [3,333.9 S"
�
TEMPORARY ACCESS
Bad -T2 [1,317.1 54F� - - �y
MR RIPARIAN SUFFER ZONE 1 UMrIs '
1 � r
CREUSE RIPARIAN BUFFER ZONE 2 LMTS
r � �
RPR4P STABBJIAl1DH
87 -n [744.1 n
ro+roRARr ACCESS
,not—z2 008.1 Sam
�y *, �'4 (r � �' �•L�
E
` , _T UPPER
J r LAKE
V owr ( STREAM
6,752X —
'ham'
OR as4 Ac)
1sa
4 �J
c ropy r.
Rte- DATE DRWJ CHRO
Hp.
840 -Zg [0.400.2', fJdi'7+y
REGRADING �,
M-21 04O v
ae11 -i2 (3aa6a sorry.
`ps �a t6 � <TEIPORAIF'V� A� c
Wk -21 (3,!6'1.4
acv
C__ �7 u .•. ��'�sJ' J I�
.ar..
C� v
146
e
Cab
2
• '6 TEMPORARY ACCESS
80e-I1 [7,351.1 90Ff] �
70 SANITARY`
2a
/
`....TEMPORARY ACCESS '
I� �. 85c -Z2 (1,261.5 SQM `-
f� ar coNSneur:noi
t � i
�■J A\ !ti° Nf�
N
SFREAMIIPAM7
NmwEER
HVVACTTYPE
DESCRFTTON
SFOWNOM
SREEr
OMMAR
REF
IMPACT
AREAiSU
FTj
Ol
CONCRETE MPACT
CONVERSION OF PON O TO STAFAM
FIST
31
FILL
dYsrN
FIC-1
67.0
FIG•]
2.7I
0EWPTEALN04ND
03
FILL
TEMPORARY COFFERDAM
FIG!
[oNSTRLC uN Or
141749
04
R
nWC,..n
POOL DECK
MI5-_
73
05
TEMPORARYFIIL
RA hLIZATlDN
F*1
aI%
\ ,.1-11 1 /\ .
� n
V ,
� S
V )
IMAACTNDAIBER
IPAC TYPE
DESCRIPT)IN
SHOWN
ON
SHEET
IMPACT
AREA
IACREM
IMPACT
AREAiSU
FTj
Ol
EXCAVATION
CONVERSION OF PON O TO STAFAM
FIST
0.86
36759
02
EXGVATrON
S€OIMOMT REMOVAL LOWER LAKE
FIG•]
2.7I
1110629
03
FILL
TEMPORARY COFFERDAM
FIG!
633
141749
04
FILL
DAM— N—ANCE
FIGI
034
=14
05
TEMPORARYFIIL
TEMPORARY RIPRAP E NERGY DISSIPAT*N
F*1
aI%
3399.9
TOTAL
1
1
4032
187.986
r�\
rant r a -- macro Luo 4Rrac
lea —Tua
aaa��y_
r _
7 �
� J
L LEGENQ
ILPICf ARFI
® OPEN WATER
N336E SUFFER ZONE 1
NEUM RIIFFFR IMPACT AREA (SCIMRE FEETI
SUFFER
BAPACT
NLWISER
SLMAREA
SHOWNON
SIIEEM
ZONEI
STAANEA
DESIGNED fn:
R. ��
a mith
umP wnul rxwFa sa.r.
eFOa cr�lxveewN.. sw 79a
Ra O. NC 275171 TIC IF1917 ,r o
HC F-0112
of Rfle�
t r�wat
91
OPANH FR
SHEET cwl•o sr W KOSKI
CROS5 "WO 8r
wPRwED er:
DATE MAY 7013
448.8
448E
RE)AARKS
r�\
rant r a -- macro Luo 4Rrac
lea —Tua
aaa��y_
r _
7 �
� J
L LEGENQ
ILPICf ARFI
® OPEN WATER
N336E SUFFER ZONE 1
CITY OF RALEIGH
NORTH CAROLINA
BROCKTON DRIVE LAKE AND DAM PROJECT
SM -2019 -0051
NEUSE BUFFER TONE 2
STREAM
RIPRAP
9B] MEUSE BUFFER TONE 1 IJUITS
= 'H = MEVSE BUFFER ZONE 2 UEHTS
IJjJ UurrS OF COMSrRUCUOM
OPEN WATER BOUNDARY
.............. STREAM OHWM BOUNDARY
401/404 F4iE-IX7NS a,110f! NOTIFICATION [PC3F)
P�/� APPl1CATR]N IYPAOT AREA TI'PF_i:
S1 STREAM IMPACT AREA
OWI OPEN WATER IMPACT AREA
B1 -ZI RIPARIAN BUFFER ZONE 1 IMPACT AREA
B1 -Z2 RIPARIAN BUFFER ZONE 2 IMPACT AREA
NUMBER(l) FOLLOWING IMPACT TYPE ABBREMTON
(S, OW, AHD B REFERS TO IMPACT HULMER LNSTED
ObHH PCN PE1bMMT APPUCATION
NEVSE BUFFERS DRAWN FROM SURVEYED EDGE OF
PROJECT NO. 6579 -71414
F$E NAME. FIGURE 2.WA
IGURE 4 - NEUSE RIPARIAN BUFFER IMPACT AREAS II MEET "0.
UPPER LAKE FIG4
NEUM RIIFFFR IMPACT AREA (SCIMRE FEETI
SUFFER
BAPACT
NLWISER
SLMAREA
SHOWNON
SIIEEM
ZONEI
STAANEA
ZONE
SUBAREA
ZONEI
ZONE2
63
91
F)G-4
448.8
448E
BZ
Eli
1034
97ME
025
364.8
11Zc
33335
1343s.s
dT
63a
FIG-3
14317
6�
349LB
Mac
57MO.a
Iqd
n73s
43135
211905
119007
Boa
p(4
S466.T
54MI2
84
54b,
FIGS
41131
96019
51067
B58
FIGS
71&116
9�
F�.4
7se9z
USE
FI64
73514
IZ615
85d
FIG-9
1377.1
65e
FIGS
111
as
USDA
FIG-3
5415
B59
FKr3
7A.2
691
FIG3
11915
951
FIGS
3953'3
425
151
FIG-]
SO&I
854
FICA
IOWA
31893
406418
11647.6
106
106
FIGS
--
SLS&9
5158.9
107
67
F.-
744.]
0
Total'
90.779.4
30,234.7
CITY OF RALEIGH
NORTH CAROLINA
BROCKTON DRIVE LAKE AND DAM PROJECT
SM -2019 -0051
NEUSE BUFFER TONE 2
STREAM
RIPRAP
9B] MEUSE BUFFER TONE 1 IJUITS
= 'H = MEVSE BUFFER ZONE 2 UEHTS
IJjJ UurrS OF COMSrRUCUOM
OPEN WATER BOUNDARY
.............. STREAM OHWM BOUNDARY
401/404 F4iE-IX7NS a,110f! NOTIFICATION [PC3F)
P�/� APPl1CATR]N IYPAOT AREA TI'PF_i:
S1 STREAM IMPACT AREA
OWI OPEN WATER IMPACT AREA
B1 -ZI RIPARIAN BUFFER ZONE 1 IMPACT AREA
B1 -Z2 RIPARIAN BUFFER ZONE 2 IMPACT AREA
NUMBER(l) FOLLOWING IMPACT TYPE ABBREMTON
(S, OW, AHD B REFERS TO IMPACT HULMER LNSTED
ObHH PCN PE1bMMT APPUCATION
NEVSE BUFFERS DRAWN FROM SURVEYED EDGE OF
PROJECT NO. 6579 -71414
F$E NAME. FIGURE 2.WA
IGURE 4 - NEUSE RIPARIAN BUFFER IMPACT AREAS II MEET "0.
UPPER LAKE FIG4

Attachment E
Select Plan Sheets
Cover
C -1 Existing Conditions I Lower Lake
C -2 Existing Conditions II Upper Lake
C -8 Proposed Conditions I Lower Lake
C -9 Proposed Conditions II Upper Lake

PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT
QUANTITIES
PHASE NUMBER(S)
1
NUMBER OF LOT(S)
0
LOT NUMBER(S) BY PHASE
0
NUMBER OF UNITS
0
LIVABLE BUILDINGS
0
OPEN SPACE
0
NUMBER OF OPEN SPACE LOTS
0
PUBLIC WATER (LF)
0
PUBLIC SEWER (LF)
180
PUBLIC STREET (LF)
0
PUBLIC SIDEWALK (LF)
0
"NOTE: FOR CITY OF RALEIGH USE ONLY. THIS INFORMATION
IS NOT TO BE USED FOR ESTIMATING, SUPPLY, CONSTRUCTION,
OR ANY OTHER APPLICATION BY THE CONTRACTOR.
UTILITY INSTALLATIONS AND OTHER PUBLIC FACILITIES, INCLUDING SIDEWALKS AND
HANDICAP RAMPS, ARE TO BE CONSTRUCTED ON ALL STREETS AS SPECIFIED BY CITY
CODE. THESE FACILITIES HAVE BEEN APPROVED BY THE CITY OF RALEIGH AND SHALL
BE INSTALLED UNLESS A CHANGE IS AUTHORIZED BY WRITTEN APPROVAL. PUBLIC
SANITARY SEWER EASEMENTS ARE TO BE RECORDED PRIOR TO FINAL ACCEPTANCE.
TRANSPORTATION SERVICES
PUBLIC UTILITIES
t�-1 OF R4t
\ti
EsT�SLI SHED
ti C
CITY OF RALEIGH
RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA
INFRASTRUCTURE PLAN REVIEW CASE NUMBER IP=9=1 1
JANUARY 2013
100% SUBMITTAL -NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION
LOCATION MAP
STORMWATER
PLANNING CDM
SEWER COLLECTION / EXTENSION SYSTEM
THE CITY OF RALEIGH CONSENTS TO THE CONNECTION AND EXTENSION OF THE CITY'S
PUBLIC SEWER SYSTEM AS SHOWN ON THIS PLAN. THE MATERIAL AND CONSTRUCTION
METHODS USED FOR THIS PROJECT SHALL CONFORM TO THE STANDARDS AND
SPECIFICATIONS OF THE CITY'S PUBLIC UTILITIES HANDBOOK.
CITY OF RALEIGH PUBLIC UTILITIES DEPARTMENT PERMIT #
AUTHORIZATION TO CONSTRUCT:
DATE:
Camp Dresser McKee & Smith
5400 Glenwood Avenue, Suite 300
Raleigh, NC 27612 1 Tel: [phone]
NC License Number F -0412
CDM Smith Project No. 6679 -71414
City of Raleigh
St lr�wate't:
�JA Aift�
PROPERTY INFORMATION
Q
5
' jj
PROPERTY ADDRESS
, e Root
N
PROPERTY
�
NO.
�`
LU
cc
U
AREA
F�Rfi'F�E�C
1„ = 600'
WALDEN WOODS
4754 WALDEN POND
HALLMA R
1716937011
-+ ¢
CONDOMINIUMS
RALEIGH, NC 27604
r
R -6
4792 MATT DRIVE
C U RTS DE
4616 KILCULLEN DR
s
1726021694
RALEIGH, NC 27604
c9
z
APARTMENT A
0.68 AC
R -10
1
_ LLaw,�
CALVARY
RALEIGH, NC 27604
4512 BROCKTON DR.
WARREN WILSON
2441 MILBURNIE RD
I
3
1716917986
RALEIGH, NC 27604
AND COMPANY
RALEIGH, NC 27610
3.33 AC
R -10
G NFL
HOMEPLACE ONE
3334 HILLSBOROUGH ST
1"I'R
❑ iu
O 9
1716915985
RALEIGH, NC 27604
MA TS
Q
E
4 r �Rr
RED CLAY �
0 BROCKTON DR.
WARREN WILSON
2441 MILBURNIE RD.
5
1716917654
RALEIGH, NC 27604
PELTON
RALEIGH, NC 27610
0.23 AC
R -10
UJ
0
Project Site
-a
C' QJ
�V
CO rock
LOCATION MAP
STORMWATER
PLANNING CDM
SEWER COLLECTION / EXTENSION SYSTEM
THE CITY OF RALEIGH CONSENTS TO THE CONNECTION AND EXTENSION OF THE CITY'S
PUBLIC SEWER SYSTEM AS SHOWN ON THIS PLAN. THE MATERIAL AND CONSTRUCTION
METHODS USED FOR THIS PROJECT SHALL CONFORM TO THE STANDARDS AND
SPECIFICATIONS OF THE CITY'S PUBLIC UTILITIES HANDBOOK.
CITY OF RALEIGH PUBLIC UTILITIES DEPARTMENT PERMIT #
AUTHORIZATION TO CONSTRUCT:
DATE:
Camp Dresser McKee & Smith
5400 Glenwood Avenue, Suite 300
Raleigh, NC 27612 1 Tel: [phone]
NC License Number F -0412
CDM Smith Project No. 6679 -71414
City of Raleigh
St lr�wate't:
�JA Aift�
PROPERTY INFORMATION
INDEX
PIN
PROPERTY ADDRESS
OWNER'S NAME
OWNER'S ADDRESS
PROPERTY
ZONING
NO.
AREA
INFORMATION
4754 WALDEN POND
WALDEN WOODS
4754 WALDEN POND
1
1716937011
RALEIGH, NC 27604
CONDOMINIUMS
RALEIGH, NC 27604
22.04 AC
R -6
4792 MATT DRIVE
4616 KILCULLEN DR
2
1726021694
RALEIGH, NC 27604
SMITH, PRISCILLA
APARTMENT A
0.68 AC
R -10
RALEIGH, NC 27604
4512 BROCKTON DR.
WARREN WILSON
2441 MILBURNIE RD
3
1716917986
RALEIGH, NC 27604
AND COMPANY
RALEIGH, NC 27610
3.33 AC
R -10
4600 BROCKTON DR.
HOMEPLACE ONE
3334 HILLSBOROUGH ST
4
1716915985
RALEIGH, NC 27604
CONDOMINIUM
RALEIGH, NC 27607
1.02 AC
R -6
0 BROCKTON DR.
WARREN WILSON
2441 MILBURNIE RD.
5
1716917654
RALEIGH, NC 27604
AND COMPANY
RALEIGH, NC 27610
0.23 AC
R -10

•
�i
T
1f
T
T
t
ii
W
V)
U
W
O
of
a_
< Z
Q
n C,()
In W
00 ~
O �
m
N
o
a
-- N F-
\ W
N N W
0) \
0 N
ai =
E a
m
W W
Q C/) cf)
M
I � �
p w
z p
N N ry
x O m
W Z
J W
Q
W
N
O -0 a-
0 a) D
u >
O W
cn N
Q
W
L p J
x J a_
cn
°
u
I
O
z
O
Q
N_
FY
O
D
Q
z
w
ry
w
D
O
U
w
O
ry
w
ry
w
O
z
Q
w
O
w
ry
Q
w
ry
O
w
J
O
SA
u
i
i
1
WE
y�
7
�i
7
I
no
i
G
r
�i
ti
T
i
i
u
w
n
No
�i
No
i

cn
°
u
I
O
z
O
Q
N_
FY
O
Q
z
w
ry
w
O
O
w
O
ry
w
ry
w
O
z
Q
w
O
w
ry
Q
w
ry
O
w
J
O
SA
u
i
i
1
WE
y�
7
�i
7
I
no
i
G
r
�i
ti
G
u
u
i
i
u
w
7
n
No
�i
7
ry
u
No
i

cn
°
u
I
O
z
O
Q
N_
FY
O
Q
z
w
ry
w
O
O
w
O
ry
w
ry
w
O
z
Q
w
O
w
ry
Q
w
ry
O
w
J
O
SA
u
i
i
1
WE
y�
7
�i
7
I
no
i
G
r
�i
ti
G
u
u
i
i
u
w
7
n
No
�i
7
ry
u
No
i

X
O
m
Y
U
W
S
U
Y
U
J
z
Z
Q
v
E v) Ld
U
B w
Ir
& z
a cf)
w
a0°
cr
p a
Z w
M
.� w
C3 O
o�w a
O �
1
E 3:
z� w
(5
a_
w
m =
w
Q
0
m
co
u �
w
W
S
cn
°
u
w
O
z
O
Q
N_
FY
O
S
Q
z
w
ry
w
S
O
S
U
w
O
ry
w
ry
w
S
O
z
Q
w
O
w
ry
Q
w
ry
O
w
J
O
S
SA
u
i
i
1
WE
y�
7
�i
7
I
no
rai
G
r
�i
ti
T
u
I
■
n
No
psi
A
G'
z
ow
w-5
>D
w U
cO
w°
ww
V) cn
�w
S=
U~
ry
J cn
J
Qz
w
c„ O
°
�w
° O
U
M W
O cf)
N
ry
100% SUBMITTAL — NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION

Attachment F
Jurisdictional Determination Form

APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION FORM
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
This form should be completed by following the instructions provided in Section IV of the JD Form Instructional Guidebook.
SECTION I: BACKGROUND INFORMATION
A. REPORT COMPLETION DATE FOR APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION (JD):
B. DISTRICT OFFICE, FILE NAME, AND NUMBER:
C. PROJECT LOCATION AND BACKGROUND INFORMATION:
State: North Carolina County /parish /borough: Wake City: Raleigh
Center coordinates of site ([at/long in degree decimal format): Lat. 35.845022 , Long. - 78.59456
Universal Transverse Mercator:
Name of nearest waterbody: Unnamed Tributary to Marsh Creek
Name of nearest Traditional Navigable Water (TNW) into which the aquatic resource flows: Neuse River
Name of watershed or Hydrologic Unit Code (HUC): Neuse, Marsh Creek: 03020201080020
® Check if map /diagram of review area and /or potential jurisdictional areas is/are available upon request.
❑ Check if other sites (e.g., offsite mitigation sites, disposal sites, etc...) are associated with this action and are recorded on a different
JD form:
D. REVIEW PERFORMED FOR SITE EVALUATION (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY):
® Office (Desk) Determination. Date: 6/29/2013
® Field Determination. Date(s): 6/29/2013
SECTION II: SUMMARY OF FINDINGS
A. RHA SECTION 10 DETERMINATION OF JURISDICTION.
There PA VIA "navigable waters of the U.S." within Rivers and Harbors Act (RHA) jurisdiction (as defined by 33 CFR part 329) in the
review area. [Required]
❑ Waters subject to the ebb and flow of the tide.
❑ Waters are presently used, or have been used in the past, or may be susceptible for use to transport interstate or foreign commerce.
Explain:
B. CWA SECTION 404 DETERMINATION OF JURISDICTION.
There Pick List "waters of the U.S." within Clean Water Act (CWA) jurisdiction (as defined by 33 CFR part 328) in the review area. [Required]
1. Waters of the U.S.
a. Indicate presence of waters of U.S. in review area (check all that apply):
❑ TNWs, including territorial seas
❑ Wetlands adjacent to TNWs
® Relatively permanent waterS2 (RPWs) that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
❑ Non -RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
❑ Wetlands directly abutting RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
❑ Wetlands adjacent to but not directly abutting RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
❑ Wetlands adjacent to non -RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
❑ Impoundments of jurisdictional waters
❑ Isolated (interstate or intrastate) waters, including isolated wetlands
b. Identify (estimate) size of waters of the U.S. in the review area:
Non - wetland waters: Approx 360 linear feet, 3 -6 ft wide, and/or acres.
Wetlands: 4.32 acres.
c. Limits (boundaries) of jurisdiction based on: OHWM Pick List
Elevation of established OHWM (if known): 1 ft
2. Non - regulated waters /wetlands (check if applicable) :3
❑ Potentially jurisdictional waters and /or wetlands were assessed within the review area and determined to be not jurisdictional.
Explain:
SECTION III: CWA ANALYSIS
A. TNWs AND WETLANDS ADJACENT TO TNWs
1 Boxes checked below shall be supported by completing the appropriate sections in Section III below.
Z For purposes of this form, an RPW is defined as a tributary that is not a TNW and that typically flows year -round or has continuous flow at least "seasonally"
(e.g., typically 3 months).
' Supporting documentation is presented in Section IILF.

-3-
❑ Artificial (man- made). Explain:
❑ Manipulated (man- altered). Explain:
Tributary properties with respect to top of bank (estimate):
Average width: 4 -8 feet
Average depth: 2 -8 feet
Average side slopes: 1:1 or less Pick List.
Primary tributary substrate composition (check all that apply):
® Silts ® Sands ❑ Concrete
® Cobbles ❑ Gravel ❑ Muck
® Bedrock ❑ Vegetation. Type /% cover:
❑ Other. Explain:
Tributary condition /stability [e.g., highly eroding, sloughing banks]. Explain: Entrenched urban stream
Presence of run/riffle /pool complexes. Explain: Minimal, mostly homogenous bed
Tributary geometry: Relatively straight Pick List
Tributary gradient (approximate average slope): 2 %
(c) Flow:
Tributary provides for: Perennial Pick List
Estimate average number of flow events in review area/year: 20 Pick List
Describe flow regime: Urban — flashy, relatively low base flow
Other information on duration and volume:
Surface flow is: Discrete and confined Pick List. Characteristics:
Subsurface flow: Unknown Pick List. Explain findings:
❑ Dye (or other) test performed:
Tributary has (check all that apply):
® Bed and banks
® OHWM6 (check all indicators that apply):
❑ clear, natural line impressed on the bank
❑ changes in the character of soil
❑ shelving
® vegetation matted down, bent, or absent
❑ leaf litter disturbed or washed away
❑ sediment deposition
❑ water staining
❑ other (list):
F-1 Discontinuous OHWM.' Explain:
® the presence of litter and debris
❑ destruction of terrestrial vegetation
❑ the presence of wrack line
® sediment sorting
® scour
❑ multiple observed or predicted flow events
❑ abrupt change in plant community
If factors other than the OHWM were used to determine lateral extent of CWA jurisdiction (check all that apply):
❑ High Tide Line indicated by: ❑ Mean High Water Mark indicated by:
❑ oil or scum line along shore objects ❑ survey to available datum;
❑ fine shell or debris deposits (foreshore) ❑ physical markings;
❑ physical markings /characteristics ❑ vegetation lines /changes in vegetation types.
❑ tidal gauges
❑ other (list):
(iii) Chemical Characteristics:
Characterize tributary (e.g., water color is clear, discolored, oily film; water quality; general watershed characteristics, etc.).
Explain: Clear urban drainage baseflow
Identify specific pollutants, if known:
(iv) Biological Characteristics. Channel supports (check all that apply):
® Riparian corridor. Characteristics (type, average width): Entrenched channel limited influence on riparian corridor
❑ Wetland fringe. Characteristics:
❑ Habitat for:
❑ Federally Listed species. Explain findings:
❑ Fish /spawn areas. Explain findings:
`A natural or man -made discontinuity in the OHWM does not necessarily sever jurisdiction (e.g., where the stream temporarily flows underground, or where
the OFIWM has been removed by development or agricultural practices). Where there is a break in the OHWM that is unrelated to the waterbody's flow
regime (e.g., flow over a rock outcrop or through a culvert), the agencies will look for indicators of flow above and below the break.
'Ibid.

-5-
A significant nexus analysis will assess the flow characteristics and functions of the tributary itself and the functions performed
by any wetlands adjacent to the tributary to determine if they significantly affect the chemical, physical, and biological integrity
of a TNW. For each of the following situations, a significant nexus exists if the tributary, in combination with all of its adjacent
wetlands, has more than a speculative or insubstantial effect on the chemical, physical and /or biological integrity of a TNW.
Considerations when evaluating significant nexus include, but are not limited to the volume, duration, and frequency of the flow
of water in the tributary and its proximity to a TNW, and the functions performed by the tributary and all its adjacent
wetlands. It is not appropriate to determine significant nexus based solely on any specific threshold of distance (e.g. between a
tributary and its adjacent wetland or between a tributary and the TNW). Similarly, the fact an adjacent wetland lies within or
outside of a floodplain is not solely determinative of significant nexus.
Draw connections between the features documented and the effects on the TNW, as identified in the Rapanos Guidance and
discussed in the Instructional Guidebook. Factors to consider include, for example:
• Does the tributary, in combination with its adjacent wetlands (if any), have the capacity to carry pollutants or flood waters to
TNWs, or to reduce the amount of pollutants or flood waters reaching a TNW?
• Does the tributary, in combination with its adjacent wetlands (if any), provide habitat and lifecycle support functions for fish and
other species, such as feeding, nesting, spawning, or rearing young for species that are present in the TNW?
• Does the tributary, in combination with its adjacent wetlands (if any), have the capacity to transfer nutrients and organic carbon that
support downstream foodwebs?
• Does the tributary, in combination with its adjacent wetlands (if any), have other relationships to the physical, chemical, or
biological integrity of the TNW?
Note: the above list of considerations is not inclusive and other functions observed or known to occur should be documented
below:
1. Significant nexus findings for non -RPW that has no adjacent wetlands and flows directly or indirectly into TNWs. Explain
findings of presence or absence of significant nexus below, based on the tributary itself, then go to Section III.D:
2. Significant nexus findings for non -RPW and its adjacent wetlands, where the non -RPW flows directly or indirectly into
TNWs. Explain findings of presence or absence of significant nexus below, based on the tributary in combination with all of its
adjacent wetlands, then go to Section III.D:
3. Significant nexus findings for wetlands adjacent to an RPW but that do not directly abut the RPW. Explain findings of
presence or absence of significant nexus below, based on the tributary in combination with all of its adjacent wetlands, then go to
Section III.D:
D. DETERMINATIONS OF JURISDICTIONAL FINDINGS. THE SUBJECT WATERS/WETLANDS ARE (CHECK ALL
THAT APPLY):
1. TNWs and Adjacent Wetlands. Check all that apply and provide size estimates in review area:
❑ TNWs: linear feet, wide, Or acres.
❑ Wetlands adjacent to TNWs: acres.
2. RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs.
® Tributaries of TNWs where tributaries typically flow year -round are jurisdictional. Provide data and rationale indicating that
tributary is perennial: Completed (and attached) NC DWQ Stream Identification Form indicates stream is perennial. Flow
has been observed for at least three months of the year.
❑ Tributaries of TNW where tributaries have continuous flow "seasonally" (e.g., typically three months each year) are
jurisdictional. Data supporting this conclusion is provided at Section III.B. Provide rationale indicating that tributary flows
seasonally:
Provide estimates for jurisdictional waters in the review area (check all that apply):
® Tributary waters: 6,250 linear feet 3 -6 wide.
❑ Other non - wetland waters: acres.
Identify type(s) of waters:
3. Non -RPWs8 that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs.
❑ Waterbody that is not a TNW or an RPW, but flows directly or indirectly into a TNW, and it has a significant nexus with a
TNW is jurisdictional. Data supporting this conclusion is provided at Section III.C.
Provide estimates for jurisdictional waters within the review area (check all that apply):
❑ Tributary waters: linear feet, wide.
❑ Other non - wetland waters: acres.
Identify type(s) of waters:
'See Footnote # 3.

-7-
❑ Non - wetland waters (i.e., rivers, streams): linear feet, wide.
❑ Lakes /ponds: acres.
❑ Other non - wetland waters: acres. List type of aquatic resource:
❑ Wetlands: acres.
Provide acreage estimates for non jurisdictional waters in the review area that do not meet the "Significant Nexus" standard, where such
a finding is required forjurisdiction (check all that apply):
❑ Non - wetland waters (i.e., rivers, streams): linear feet, wide.
❑ Lakes /ponds: acres.
❑ Other non - wetland waters: acres. List type of aquatic resource:
❑ Wetlands: acres.
SECTION IV: DATA SOURCES.
A. SUPPORTING DATA. Data reviewed for JD (check all that apply - checked items shall be included in case file and, where checked
and requested, appropriately reference sources below):
❑ Maps, plans, plots or plat submitted by or on behalf of the applicant /consultant:
® Data sheets prepared/submitted by or on behalf of the applicant/consultant.
❑ Office concurs with data sheets /delineation report.
❑ Office does not concur with data sheets /delineation report.
❑ Data sheets prepared by the Corps:
❑ Corps navigable waters' study:
® U.S. Geological Survey Hydrologic Atlas:
® USGS NHD data.
❑ USGS 8 and 12 digit HUC maps.
® U.S. Geological Survey map(s). Cite scale & quad name:
❑ USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service Soil Survey. Citation:
® National wetlands inventory map(s). Cite name:
❑ State /Local wetland inventory map(s):
❑ FEMA/FIRM maps:
❑ 100 -year Floodplain Elevation is: (National Geodectic Vertical Datum of 1929)
® Photographs: ❑ Aerial (Name & Date):
or ❑ Other (Name & Date):
❑ Previous determination(s). File no. and date of response letter:
❑ Applicable /supporting case law:
❑ Applicable /supporting scientific literature:
❑ Other information (please specify):
B. ADDITIONAL COMMENTS TO SUPPORT JD:

Attachment G
Site Photos

Photo 1. Stream Upstream of Upper Lake (2010)
Photo 2. Stream within Recent Footprint of Upper Lake Looking Upstream (2010)

Photo 3. Upper Lake Looking Upstream (2010)
Photo 4. Lower Lake Looking Downstream (2010)

Photo 5. Discharge Downstream of Lower Lake and Plunge Pool (2010)