20130398 Ver 2_401 Application_20171117

Preliminary ORM Data Entry Fields for New Actions
SAW — 2017 -
BEGIN DATE [Received Date]:
Prepare file folder F-1 Assign Action ID Number in ORM
1. Project Name [PCN Form A2a]: Oakdale Road Widening Project
2. Work Type: Private ❑ Institutional F-1 Government FE -1 Commercial
3. Project Description / Purpose [PCN Form B3d and Be]:
The purpose of this project is Oakdale Road widening.
4. Property Owner/ Applicant [PCN Form A3 or A4]: City of Charlotte, POC: Ms. Leslie Bing
5. Agent / Consultant [PCN Form A5 — or ORM Consultant ID Number]: Gregg Antemann, PWS
6. Related Action ID Number(s) [PCN Form B5b]: SAW 2013-00714
7. Project Location - Coordinates, Street Address, and/or Location Description [PCN Form 131b]:
Oakdale Road, Charlotte, NC
35.2877550, -80.8924190
8. Project Location - Tax Parcel ID [PCN Form B1a]: N/A
9. Project Location — County [PCN Form A2b]: Mecklenburg
10. Project Location — Nearest Municipality or Town [PCN Form A2c]: Charlotte
11. Project Information — Nearest Waterbody [PCN Form 132a]: Gum Branch
12. Watershed / 8 -Digit Hydrologic Unit Code [PCN Form 132c]: Catawba 03050101
Authorization: Section 10 ❑ Section 404 ❑E Section 10 & 404
Regulatory Action Type:
F1 Standard Permit
0 Nationwide Permit # 14
E] Regional General Permit #
F-1 Jurisdictional Determination Request
F
]Unauthorized
Pre -Application Request
Activity
0 Compliance
❑ No Permit Required
Revised 20150602

CAROLINA WETLAND SERVICES, INC.
550 E. Westinghouse Blvd.
Charlotte, NC 28273
704-527-1177 (office)
704-527-1133 (fax)
November 27, 2017
Ms. Crystal Amschler
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
151 Patton Avenue, Room 208
Asheville, NC 28801
Ms. Karen Higgins
NCDWQ — Wetlands and Storm Water Branch
512 N Salisbury St
9th Floor Archdale Building
Raleigh NC 27603
Subject: Pre -Construction Notification Pursuant to Nationwide Permit No. 14
and Water Quality Certification No. 4088
Oakdale Road Widening Project (SAW 2013-00714, DWQ# 13-0398)
Charlotte, North Carolina
Carolina Wetland Services Project No. 2017-0505
Dear Ms. Higgins and Ms. Amschler,
The Oakdale Road Widening Project is located along Oakdale Road and side streets between
Old Plank Road and 500 feet north of Dale Avenue in Charlotte, North Carolina (Figures 1 and
2, attached). Oakdale Road is a minor thoroughfare located in northwest Charlotte
approximately five miles from the central business district. The purpose of this project is to
upgrade Oakdale Road to a complete urban "Avenue Type" street with intermittent landscaped
medians and median divided left turn lanes. The project will reduce speeds and improve public
safety along Oakdale Road. On behalf of City of Charlotte, RS&H Engineering has
sub -contracted Carolina Wetland Services, Inc. (CWS) to provide Section 404/401 permitting
services for this project. An executed Agent Authorization Form is attached (Attachment A).
CWS is submitting a Pre -Construction Notification pursuant to a Nationwide Permit No. 14
(Attachment B) for proposed impacts to 144 linear feet of permanent stream impacts and 51
linear feet of temporary stream impacts.
NORTH CAROLINA • SOUTH CAROLINA
WWW.CWS-INC.NET
Page 1 of 7

Oakdale Road Widening Project
Nationwide Permit No. 14
November 27, 2017
CWS Project No. 2017-0505
Applicant Name: City of Charlotte, POC: Ms. Leslie Bing
Mailing Address: Engineering and Property Management, 600 East Fourth Street, Charlotte,
NC 28202
Street Address of Project: Oakdale Road, Charlotte, NC
Waterway: UT to Gum Branch
Basin: Catawba (HUC' 03050101)
City: Charlotte
County: Mecklenburg
Decimal Degree Coordinate Location of Project Site: 35.2877551, -80.8924191
USGS Quadrangle Name: Mountain Island Lake, NC (2017)
Project History
The site was originally delineated On February 4, 2013 and a Preliminary Jurisdictional
Determination was requested along with the Nationwide Permit No. 14 application. On May 29,
2013 the Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) issued the 404 Verification for 129 If of permanent
impacts and 47 If of temporary impacts (SAW 2013-00714; Attachment C). The permit expired
March 18, 2017. North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality (NCDEQ) issued the
Water Quality Certification on June 11, 2013 (DWQ# 13-0398; Attachment D). This PCN is a
request for reauthorization of a of a previously permitted project. Minor revisions to the
proposed grading limits and rip rap aprons have been made since the permits were previously
approved.
Current Land Use
The project corridor is approximately 26 acres in extent and is comprised of road right-of-way
along Oakdale Road and portions of adjacent single family residential and commercial
properties with maintained lawns and asphalt parking lots. Dominant vegetation within the
project area consists of loblolly pine (Pinus taeda), boxelder (Acer negundo), multiflora rose
(Rosa multiflora), sawtooth blackberry (Rubus argutus), winged sumac (Rhus copallinum),
sweetgum (Liquidambar styraciflua), Chinese privet (Ligustrum sinense), Japanese honeysuckle
(Lonicera japonica), and Canada goldenrod (Solidago altissima).
According to the United States Department of Agriculture - Natural Resources Conservation
Service (USDA-NRCS) Soil Surveys of Mecklenburg County2 (Figures 4 and 5, attached),
on-site soils consist of Cecil sandy clay loam (2 to 8 percent slopes, moderately eroded [CeB2]),
Enon sandy loam, (2 to 8 percent slopes [EnB]), Pacolet sandy clay loam (2 to 8 percent slopes
[PeB2]), and Pacolet sandy clay loam (8 to 15 percent slopes [PeC2]). None of the on-site soils,
are listed on the North Carolina Hydric Soils List for Mecklenburg County3 and the National
Hydric Soils List4 as hydric or containing hydric inclusions.
"HUC" is the Hydrologic Unit Code. U.S. Geological Survey, 1974. Hydrologic Unit Map, State of North Carolina.
Z United States Department of Agriculture, 2013. Soil Survey of Mecklenburg County, North Carolina.
3 United States Department of Agriculture — Natural Resources Conservation Service, 1999. North Carolina Hydric Soils List,
USDA-NRCS North Carolina State Office, Raleigh.
4 United States Department of Agriculture — Natural Resources Conservation Service, 2015. 2015 National Hydric Soils List by
State.
Page 2 of 7

Oakdale Road Widening Project
Nationwide Permit No. 14
National Wetlands Inventory
November 27, 2017
CWS Project No. 2017-0505
Wetlands are an important source of biodiversity and provide a multitude of ecological services.
The National Wetlands Inventory (NWI), created by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, is a
program which provides wetland data and analysis to the public. A review of the NWI GIS layer
does not depict any potential wetland features within the project limits (Figure 6, attached).
Jurisdictional Delineation
On February 4, 2013, CWS scientists Thomas Blackwell, Professional Wetland Scientist PWS,
and Gregg Antemann, PWS, delineated on-site jurisdictional waters of the U.S., including
wetlands. On October 18, 2017, the site was re -delineated by CWS scientists Sean Martin,
Senior Scientist, and Aliisa Harjuniemi, Wetland Professional in Training, in order to update the
delineation.
Jurisdictional areas were delineated (flagged in the field), classified, and mapped with a sub -foot
Trimble Geo7X GPS unit using the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) Routine On -Site
Determination Method. This method is defined in the 1987 Corps of Engineers Delineation
Manual,5 the 2007 USACE Jurisdictional Form Instructional Guidebook,5 with further technical
guidance from the 2012 Eastern Mountains & Piedmont Regional Supplement.'
Jurisdictional stream channels were classified according to the North Carolina Department of
Environmental Quality (NCDEQ) guidance. These classifications include sampling with a
D -shaped dip net, photograph documentation, and defining approximate breakpoints (location at
which stream channel changes classification) within each on-site stream channel. NCDEQ
Stream Classification Forms representative of jurisdictional stream channels are attached
(SCP1 and SCP2, Attachment E). A Wetland Determination Data Form representative of
on-site non -jurisdictional upland areas is attached as DP1 (Attachment F). Locations of
collected data points for stream classification points and the Wetland Determination Data Forms
are depicted on Figure 7 (attached).
Results
The results of the on-site field investigation indicate that there are two jurisdictional stream
channels (Streams A and B) located within the project area (Figure 7, attached). The on-site
jurisdictional waters drain to Gum Branch. Gum Branch is part of the Santee River Basin (HUC
03050101) and is classified as "Water Supply IV (WS -IV) Waters" by the NCDEQ. According to
the NCDEQ, WS -IV Waters are defined as: "Waters used as sources of water supply for
drinking, culinary, or food processing purposes where a WS -I, II, or I II classification is not
feasible. These waters are also protected for Class C uses. WS -IV waters are generally in
moderately to highly developed watersheds or Protected Area."8
s Environmental Laboratory. 1987. "Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual", Technical Report Y-87-1, US Army
Engineer Waterways Experiment Station, Vicksburg, Mississippi.
s USACE Jurisdictional Determination Form Instructional Guidebook. 2007. USACE Regulatory National Standard Operating
Procedures for conducting an approved jurisdictional determination (JD) and documenting practices to support an approved JD.
USACE Headquarters, Washington, DC.
US Army Corps of Engineers, April 2012. Regional Supplement to the Corps of Engineers Wetland Delineation Manual: Eastern
Mountains and Piedmont Region. US Army Engineer Research and Development Center, Vicksburg, Mississippi.
a NCDEQ. "Surface Water Classifications." http://portal.ncdenr.org/web/wq/ps/csu/classifications.
Page 3 of 7

Oakdale Road Widening Project
Nationwide Permit No. 14
November 27, 2017
CWS Project No. 2017-0505
On -Site jurisdictional waters of the U.S. total approximately 0.03 acres, including 437 linear feet
of jurisdictional stream channel. Photographs 1-4 are representative of the on-site jurisdictional
features (Attachment G). On -Site jurisdictional waters of the U.S. are summarized in Table 1.
Table 1. Summary of On -Site Jurisdictional Waters of the U.S., including Wetlands
Jurisdictional
Stream
Jurisdiction
NCDEQ Stream
Classification
Score
Photograph(s)
Linear Feet
(If)
Acreage
(ac.)
USACE/EPA Rapanos
Classification'
Stream A
RPW
33
1,2
334
0.023
Stream B
RPW
1 34 1
3,4
1 103 1
0.007
Stream Total:
1 437 If I0.03
ac.
Agency Correspondence
Cultural Resources
A letter was forwarded to the North Carolina State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO) on
February 25, 2013 to determine the presence of any areas of architectural, historic, or
archaeological significance that would be affected by the project. CWS also consulted the
SHPO online GIS service10 a Charlotte -Mecklenburg Historic Landmarks Commission's
webpage" and found no historical structures, buildings, sites, or districts within the project limits.
In a response letter dated March 12, 2013, the SHPO states that they "are aware of no historic
resources which would be affected by the project. Therefore, we have no comment on the
project as proposed." A copy of the SHPO response letter is attached (Attachment H).
Protected Species
CWS scientists performed a data review using North Carolina Natural Heritage Program
(NCNHP) Data Explorer 12 on October 26, 2017 to determine the presence of any federally -listed,
candidate endangered, threatened species, or critical habitat located within the project area.
Based on the NCNHP review, there are no records of federally -protected species within the
project limits. Within a mile of the project area, there is one element occurrence record for the
Carolina heelsplitter (Lasmigona decorata). A copy of the NCNHP report is attached
(Attachment 1). There is no suitable habitat for Carolina heelsplitter within the project area.
Purpose and Need for the Project
Oakdale Road is a minor thoroughfare located in northwest Charlotte approximately five miles
from the central business district. The purpose of this project is to upgrade Oakdale Road to a
complete urban "Avenue Type" street with intermittent landscaped medians and median divided
left turn lanes. The project is necessary to reduce speeds and improve public safety along
Oakdale Road.
9 Classifications of streams include Traditionally Navigable Waters (TNWs), Relatively Permanent Waters (RPWs), and
Non -Relatively Permanent Waters (Non-RPWs). Subcategories of RPWs include perennial streams that typically have
year-round flow, and seasonal streams that have continuous flow at least seasonally. Two classifications of jurisdictional wetlands
are used to describe proximity and connection to TNWs. These classifications include either adjacent or directly abutting.
Adjacent wetlands are defined as wetlands within floodplains or in close proximity to a TNW but without a direct visible
connection. Abutting wetlands have a direct surface water connection traceable to a TNW.
10 North Carolina State Historic Preservation Office, http://gis.ncdcr.gov/hpoweb/. Accessed October 26, 2017.
11 http://Iandmarkscommission.org/designated-historic-landmarks/
12 North Carolina Natural Heritage Data Explorer, https://ncnhde.natureserve.org/. Accessed October 26, 2017.
Page 4 of 7

Oakdale Road Widening Project
Nationwide Permit No. 14
November 27, 2017
CWS Project No. 2017-0505
As a part of the upgrade of Oakdale Road the drainage system for the road will also be
upgraded to convey the 25 -year storm event per City of Charlotte design standards. The
existing 60" Reinforced Concrete Pipe (RCP) under Oakdale Road at 1320 Oakdale Road will
be replaced with a 72" RCP. Riprap aprons will be installed upstream and downstream of the
culvert for energy dissipation entering and exiting the pipe.
In addition, the existing 48 -inch RCP that parallels Peachtree Road, west of Oakdale Road, will
be replaced with a 54 -inch RCP of the same length and a riprap apron will be installed at the
outlet.
Avoidance and Minimization
Impacts to on-site jurisdictional waters of the U.S. have been reduced to the maximum extent
possible. Proper sediment and erosion control measures will be used to minimize disturbances
to downstream waters. All work will be constructed in the dry in accordance with Water Quality
Certification No. 4088.
Piping of jurisdictional stream channel has been limited to 69 linear feet, the minimum
necessary to facilitate the road shoulder and embankment. Headwalls will be used to limit
culvert lengths to the maximum extent practicable. Riprap apron lengths have also been
minimized to the greatest extent practicable while still meeting Charlotte Department of
Transportation standards.
Proposed Impacts to Jurisdictional Waters
Unavoidable impacts to Jurisdictional Waters of the U.S. under Nationwide Permit Number 14
total 170 linear feet of impacts to RPW Stream A and 25 linear feet of impacts to Seasonal RPW
Stream B.
Impacts to RPW Stream A include 124 linear feet of permanent impacts and approximately 46
linear feet of temporary impacts. Impacts to RPW Stream B include approximately 20 linear feet
of permanent impacts and 5 linear feet of temporary impacts. No single crossing exceeds 150
linear feet of permanent impact to a jurisdictional water of the U.S.
Permanent impacts to RPW Stream A are the result of 69 linear feet of pipe extension and 55
linear feet of riprap apron to be installed upstream and downstream of the new pipe for energy
dissipation purposes (Figure 8, attached). The existing 60 -inch RCP under Oakdale Road at
1320 Oakdale Road will be replaced with 54 linear feet of 72 -inch RCP. Junction boxes will be
installed upstream and downstream of this pipe, and an additional 30 linear feet of 72 -inch RCP
will be installed at the upstream and downstream ends of the pipe system (Figure 8, attached).
The new pipe system will be 115 linear feet in length with a net permanent impact length of 69
linear feet (Figure 8, attached). Additionally, a 15 -linear foot riprap apron will be installed at the
upstream end of the pipe system, and a 40 -linear foot riprap apron will be installed at the
downstream end. These riprap aprons are necessary to dissipate the energy of the water
entering and exiting the culvert and to protect the stream bed from erosion.
Smaller side systems will be tying to the new 72 -inch diameter pipes at the proposed new
junction boxes. Because of this, City of Charlotte requests a waiver from the General Condition
Page 5 of 7

Oakdale Road Widening Project
Nationwide Permit No. 14
November 27, 2017
CWS Project No. 2017-0505
No. 3.6.1 as the proposed new pipe system will not be buried (Figure 8, attached). The current
system has not been buried.
There are two proposed side connections at each of these junction boxes ranging in size from
15 -inch to 24 -inch diameter pipes. These side systems will have inverts that are significantly
higher than the inverts of the boxes, with drops ranging from three to eight feet. If the proposed
72 -inch diameter pipe were to be buried in order to create a natural bottom, there would be
significant erosion of the natural bottom within the junction boxes during every storm event
because of these side system drops. This would create an unstable bottom, and would result in
scour, turbidity, and the deposition of the eroded sediment load in the channel downstream. As
this would create a permanently unstable condition within the pipe, it was determined that the
most environmentally sensitive option would be the one that is currently proposed in the plans
(see Figure 8, attached).
Permanent impacts to Seasonal RPW Stream B total approximately 15 linear feet and consist of
riprap apron and grading (Figure 9 attached). The existing 48 -inch RCP will be replaced with a
54 -inch RCP of the same length. The pipe to be replaced outfalls from the closed system into
the beginning of the Stream A, and it is not carrying a stream like a culvert. Therefore, the pipe
replacement doesn't need to be buried. The stream channel will be regraded for 45 linear feet
downstream of the pipe to eliminate the existing unstable headcut. The existing 25 -foot long,
serviceable riprap apron will be replaced with a 30 -foot -long riprap apron. This will result in a
five linear feet net permanent impact due riprap and 15 linear feet net permanent impact due
grading.
Temporary impacts to RPW Stream A total 46 linear feet and are the result of the sediment
traps. Temporary impacts to RPW Stream B total five linear feet and are the result of sediment
traps. Details of the temporary erosion control measures are attached (Construction Detail
Sheets EC1 and EC2, Attachment J). Impacts to jurisdictional waters of the U.S. resulting from
this project are summarized in Table 2, below.
Table 2. Proposed Impacts to On -Site Jurisdictional Waters of the U.S., including Wetlands
Jurisdictional
Feature
Impact
No.
NWP
No.
Type of Impact
Temporary/
Permanent
Impact
(If)
Impact
(ac)
S1
14
Culvert Extension
Permanent
69
0.004
Stream A
S2
14
Riprap
Permanent
55
0.003
S3
14
Sediment traps
Temporary
26
0.001
S4
14
Sediment traps
Temporary
20
0.001
S5
14
Riprap
Permanent
5
0.0003
Stream B
S6
14
Channel Grading
Permanent
15
0.001
S7
14
Sediment traps
Temporary
5
0.0003
Total Stream Impacts:
195 If
0.011 ac.
Stream Impacts (Temporary):
51 If
0.002 ac.
Stream Impacts (Permanent):1
144 If
0.009 ac.
Page 6 of 7

Oakdale Road Widening Project
Nationwide Permit No. 14
Compensatory Mitigation
November 27, 2017
CWS Project No. 2017-0505
Permanent impacts to jurisdictional waters of the U.S. have been limited to less than 150 linear
feet per stream crossing. Therefore, no mitigation is proposed for these impacts.
Thank you for the opportunity to provide these services on this important project. Please do not
hesitate to contact Gregg Antemann at 704-408-1683 or [e-mail] should you have
any questions or comments regarding this report.
Sincerely,
Gregg Antemann, PWS
Principal Scientist
wWETS�4,,e;
r
w r ld0. POf�
, a
Aliisa Harjuniemi, WPIT
Project Scientist
Attachments: Figure 1: Vicinity Map
Figure 2: USGS Topographic Map
Figure 3: Aerial Imagery
Figure 4: USDA-NRCS Current Soil Survey of Mecklenburg County
Figure 5: USDA-NRCS Historic Soil Survey of Mecklenburg County
Figure 6: National Wetlands Inventory
Figure 7: Jurisdictional Boundaries
Figure 8: Proposed Impacts (S1 -S4)
Figure 9: Proposed Impacts (S5 -S7)
Attachment A - Agent Authorization Form
Attachment B - Pre -Construction Notification Pursuant to NWP No. 14
Attachment C - 404 General Permit Verification
Attachment D - 401 Water Quality Certification
Attachment E - NCDEQ Stream Classification Forms (SCP1-SCP2)
Attachment F - USACE Wetland Determination Data Form (DP1)
Attachment G - Photopage (Photographs 1-4)
Attachment H - SHPO Response
Attachment I - NCNHP Data Review Report
Attachment J - Construction Detail Sheets
Page 7 of 7

C:\UsersNAiiisaHaduniemi\Desktop\CurrentProjects\Dale and Oakdale\Oakdale\ArcGIS\Fig1_Vicinky.mxd

J
1 I i5 a r�
I _
6 +
,`
LeR,
WROq-FM l
10
Oakdale Road
,If
-o tie
{
+aux U
a
Dale Avenue _
IL /Y
` kUTF. A J
1 O
1510
zVLIS Frkpy i
i
a�a0 oR
f7
ej
Or
grt
FXC
F
-�
1W end _ i ; _ Legend
( o
Project Limits (26.4 ac.)
\�
'..F, 2,000 1,000 0 2,000 Feet
REFERENCE: 7.5 MINUTE TOPOGRAPHIC USGS QUADRANGLE MOUNTAIN ISLAND LAKE, INC (2017)-
SCALE:DATE: FIGURE NO.
1 inch = 2,000 feet 10/26/2017 USGS Site Location Map
CWS PROJECT NO: DRAWN BY:
2017-0505 AVH Oakdale Road Widening Project 2
APPLICANT NO: CHECKED BY: CAROLINA Charlotte, North Carolina
GCA WETLAND SERVICES Nationwide Permit No. 14
C:\Users\AliisaHarjuniemi\Desktop\Current Projects\Dale and Oakdale\Oakdale\ArcGIS\Fig2a_USGS.mxd

C:\Users\AliisaHaduniemi\Desktop\Current Projects\Dale and Oakdale\0akdale\ArcGIS\Fig3_Aerial.mxd

� des
st N
Cora St �
O
Q-
°'� 0
o � Q
v.
e PJ
G � I o •
�7 ' G� • 2R V N i
CeD2
MO Z °
MO
C 2 PaE
nD o
o n6
EnB /
�En6
CeB2
MO
0
r
` uB
r1 �°
W
Legend
HeB [fit
Soil Unit Name and Description Hydric
Coverage (%)
Project Limits (26.4 ac.)
CeB2—Cecil sandy clay loam, 2 to 8 percent slopes, moderately eroded No
85.9
ads
EnB—Eason sandy loam, 2 to 8 percent slopes No
14.2
B
Total Coverage:
100%
1,000 500 0 1,000 Feet
REFERENCE: USDA-NRCS SOIL SURVEY OF MECKLENBURG COUNTY, INC, DATED 2017.
IN
SCALE:
1 inch = 1,000 feet
DATE: 10�26�2017
USDA-NRCS Current Soil Survey
FIGURE NO.
of Mecklenburg County
CWS PROJECT NO:
DRAWN BY:
2017-0505
AVH
Oakdale Road Widening Project
4
APPLICANT NO:
CHECKED BY:
CAROLINA
Charlotte, North Carolina
GCA
WETLAND SERVICES
Nationwide Permit No. 14
C:\Users\AliisaHarjuniemi\Desktop\Current Projects\Dale and Oakdale\Oakdale\ArcGIS\Fig4_CurrentSoil.mxd

C:\Users\AliisaHarjuniemi\Desktop\Current Projects\Dale and Oakdale\Oakdale\ArcGIS\Fig5_HistorictSoils.mxd

pt
Crag e ✓domes
\o� �fl' St St
�o\ EM1Ch Cora O
d
�p k Or
91 39' sha w
N \P,`
lagler Ln o 1 s
CD N
to
C
v pale PJ
3
717
2
Pl ih P„ ,h 0
to -
P��o P I h
� G� V
C 1I Ct a w. o m
Mearn Rd ��
a �
C Ri neck Rd
L
Q
O ~
A/
dh
O'
--ge Rd
iiott St �o
d
1 cee dpi
m QeaG Cd�P4
'D
n r
3 D
a
C
n O 0
C
l6
U
Grass Ridge Dr
0
o�
w o,
o Oi 9 C~ds
O� ct
a
e
p,uten Rd
�N
2 W
t ��o
U O
5"
C:\Users\AliisaHarjuniemi\Desktop\Current Projects\Dale and Oakdale\Oakdale\ArcGIS\Fig6_NWl.mxd
1! -.4 =
Legend
Project Limits (23.8 ac.)
old Mt
Roads
yoliy
Rd
National Wetland Inventory
o
First
�,
�rPe` ...
® Freshwater Emergent Wetland
St
'0o
o�i
Freshwater Forested/Shrub Wetland
-
o
ON
Freshwater Pond
Qo
REFERENCE: NATIONAL WETLAND INVENTORY DATA PROIVDED BY UNITED STATES
FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE FOR NORTH CAROLINA, DATED 2015. BACKGROUND LAYER(S)
1,000 500 0 1,000 Feet
PROVIDED BY MECKLENBURG COUNTY GIS DEPARTMENT, DATED 2015.
`o
SCALE:
1 inch = 1,000 feet
DATE:
10/26/2017
National Wetland Inventory
FIGURE NO.
CWS PROJECT NO:
DRAWN BY:
Oakdale Road Widening Project
Charlotte, North Carolina
2017-0505
AVH
CAR 0 L�I�N A
6
PPLICANT NO:
CHECKED BY:
GCA
Nationwide Permit No. 14
C:\Users\AliisaHarjuniemi\Desktop\Current Projects\Dale and Oakdale\Oakdale\ArcGIS\Fig6_NWl.mxd

78
78
78
77
77
76
DATUM ELEV
764.00
40+00 40+50 41+00 41+50 42+00 42+50 43+00 43+50 44+00 44+50
SEE
I f
I w � II II
I � I
I
03509108 oI I II
WOODMEN OF THE WORLD LODGE 96 PROP. TRAPEZOIDAL CHANNEL S2 -RPW Stream A
DB 7997/PG 807 4' WIDTH WITH 3:1 SIDE
OAKDALE ROAD SLOPES LINE CHANNEL WITH II
EC MATTING (COIR) TO TOB - 40 If permanent impacts _ 3
(riprap apron)
Os y PROP. 54 LF II cc
m OF 72" RCP II
AT 0.50%
"I
€ o e—y—ewe I
I�
+ S SDE � ®E SDE SDE of
o Q.SD-4 *1"00 83
i...,i tiY 3 1t 11 tf,Wt.
82
SS SS 55 SS SS SS SS N 0 i �0§S 0§SO ( S 3055
S4 - RPW Stream A
— 20 If total temporary
0 SQ. YDS
impacts (sediment traps) S1P 40RPW Stream A m
IMPROVEMENTS STA. 41+152
59 PRD- 35 If permanent I :i
03509107
JACK B. DELLINGER AND impacts (72" RCP) II
ALMA WILLA DELLINGER
DB 1280/PG 77 •.
1239 OAKDALE ROAD I
i II IIw
3 I I I
n
s v I SEE SHE
I
0
1
N Fv SE
SENSITIVE MATERIAL
'-- v — Do Not Duplicate
-ccLu
M SEE SHEET 13 FOR
2 \ PROP. IMPROVEMENTS
p Q`)� m ` TO OAKDALE ROAD (1 -1) "
S2 - RPW Stream A
o';I 3s C - 15 If permanent impacts
II I 1 (riprap apron) _" m
I
iI x x
POP. 30 LF o
p CI
77' RCP g0 A0.50sD
I E
SDE PROP. CLASS I I I g A a
t $w SD RIPRAP APRON
II L=1SW=15', D=2.5'
2V
SQQ . YDS. FILTgR, L
z FABRIC-��--x-..—x_%aco W E �c x o m m
w 0
se 44+57.60 o} 3 Y o
11A J — — o; a
� Iw
_ TIE PROP. CHANNEL TO EX. m
-----_
II
�0
z
a
CHANNEL AT STATION 43+202
I (Ssvye) Ma PROP. TRAPEZOIDAL CHANNEL 64
3Jryn'+3wirry 4' WIDTH AND 3:1 SIDE SLOPES
C
Z=
�dy
o SS F WITH 30 SQ. YDS.
A
KIMB RLY S33KEZIAH
80 F
S3- RPW Stream A
=
C
owl
I S1 - RPW Stream A 26 If total temporary
c
w A
34 If permanent impacts (sediment traps)
°x z
z
lye ° impacts (72" RCP) �S
ww w
a
\
I I
o
\ a o
N ao \ SS � � E••
II I\ \
3\SSS Figure 8 A o A
SS

M
DATUM E
770.00
798
LEV
P top. ROADWAY
794
PROP. DW/
NCDOT SID 838.21
STA 2 +49.70
790
INV 0 =778.38PROP. 3:1 MAX SLOPE
_--
-----
786
782
AgaP AT 1.008 ------------ ---
PROP. CHANNEL OM
---___
80%
778
NCDOT STD. 840.32
BEGIN PROP. CHANNEL IMF ROVEMENTS -
774
5T0. 2)+05:k GRATE t.ZU.BV
IN=781 .5
INV 0UT=780.30
N W W W
�N W DO W M a
n r r r n h r
20+00 20+50 21+00 21+50 22+00 22+50
Existing:
192 linear feet of 48" RCP
25 if of riprap
Proposed:
192 linear feet of 54" RCP
30 linear feet of riprap
SEE SHEET 10
i SENSITIVE MATERIAL o _
Do Not Duplicate
I /a
/ 4 / a ,�I\11111111
SEE SHEET 10 FOR .,�
�olt0 6ARo`2
o ( o PROP. IMPROVEMENTS �.�`2° gE55/ ;
/ �Wxwoox
—OD TOOAKDALFRO AD (L 1) SEAL ,
® I UO Ot E \ o I 03111®w�
\ \ I I 03509101 I l¢ m I / E \ N \ iii, k0° IPI$j
" LINDA M. THUEMMEL AND
S7 -RPW Stream B ORE
xOowoo 8owr000 I ' W J I ;/ / N '' I C
" m I HUSBAND NEIL THUEMMEL o /, 4 I °yf \ O 1j114/jj ��100
AND JOHN W. MCLEMe
I I 15 If additional DB 8381/PG 18
\
\ 19 OAKDALE ROAD I Q C
10
" II temporary impacts
I I (sediment traps) w
TIE PROP. OUTFALL TO EX.
\" CHANNEL AT STA. 20+05+ _ . O
L I I al
W RESET 177 LF OFII
PROP. CLASS ', W2= APRON
WOOD PRIVACY FENCE I /+ >
\ L=30', YDS. F5', R FABRIC D=1.5' I
LI SO. YDS. FILTER FABRIC \f + a
15
`\ LINE EXISTING CHANNEL
a Y
— — — 000 " xo
21+00—LINE SD� I — — — 53 22 60.—Al
woe"cM I4 11 I �� o o R m
SIDE
E E J,.ie+o/vc gas) `'' I
E� I r d
SDE lµ" IS
SDE /x E I a\ X- °\\\ °\ \1/
III w -I -X I I v. \ 4 4A `Cq1,
REMOVE 192 LF PROP. 192 LF OF Y I 53 m LL3
w P ¢ OF EX. 48" RCP 54' RCP AT 1.00.'6 I 42 e 54
II I STABILIZE CHANNEL
IMPROVEMENTS WITH I e PEACHTREE ROAD „f' ILL III N
37 SO. YDS.
" 11 EC MATTING (COIR) J DB 23017/PG 640
S5 & S6 -RPW Stream B RAVEN RIDGE HOMEOWNERS
SOC. OF MECKLENBURG INC.
o� �Ilm I I - 25 If of existing riprap to be replaced with 30 If rip rap
% z F
I xx�x° B2 I 9 P p p p p 0 =°"I a max.` A o �q o
wax �w wII I w 03509226 I 03- 5 If net permanent impacts due riprap apron and I 03509231 ow %jl III °y ,�+ ��' \ /' / i O W 1v
X HOLDINGS LLC DAN MOSER COMPANY INC. I u CHf uyi T / 1n
DB 27293/PG 1881 DB 27 +/ A
I 413 PEACHTREE ROA DB PEACHTREE
212 II N j o Ace A C7
I 417 PEAgrading (S5) 433 PEACHTREE RDAD rp 0 o a W
II 15 If net permanent impacts due grading (S6) w � II NII _ I ° /* : wF ' / W U 4 a
cn �•,z
O
Hs/F ✓ O
- REB
�- I --- \�-coxc,
wx0� ---- ° ex.�a—c_c�� � _
alb
------_ L--1-��--- -_--- 1--�N----------------- < �m
r— I I � �A
o
o�
o ��
E -�
I
-- zo A� ----- _ II Figure 9
xx _ Iu} PEACHTREE ROAD (50' PURI Ic R/n/lA\��.o., A /`� 4

Oakdale Road Widening Project
Attachments
ATTACHMENT A:
Agent Authorization Form
November 1, 2017
CWS Project No. 2017-0505

AGENT CERTIFICATION OF AUTHORIZATION
I, the undersigned, a duly authorized representative for the linear project identified herein, do
authorize representative of the Wilmington District, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (Corps) to
enter upon the property, easement and/or right-of-way herein described for the purpose of
conducting on-site investigations and issuing a determination associated with Waters of the U.S.
subject to Federal jurisdictional under Section 404 of the Clean Water Act and/or Section 10 of
the Rivers and Harbors Act of 1899.
I, Ms. Leslie Bing, representing City of Charlotte, hereby certify that I have authorized Gregg
Antemann of Carolina Wetland Services, Inc. to act on my behalf and take all actions necessary
to the processing, issuance, and acceptance of this request for wetlands determination /
permitting and any and all standard and special conditions attached.
We hereby certify that the above information submitted in this application is true and accurate to
the best of our knowledge.
Applic ni:'s si6nature
e,
Date
Agent's signature
10-26-2017
Date
Completion of this form will allow the agent to sign
all future application correspondence.

Oakdale Road Widening Project
Attachments
ATTACHMENT B:
November 1, 2017
CWS Project No. 2017-0505
Pre -Construction Notification Pursuant to Nationwide
Permit No. 14

d�pF W A rE�%
flvfil::�,C
Office Use Only:
Corps action ID no.
DWQ project no.
Form Version 1.4 January 2009
Page 1 of 14
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009
Pre -Construction Notification (PCN) Form
A.
Applicant Information
1.
Processing
1 a.
Type(s) of approval sought from the Corps:
N Section 404 Permit ❑ Section 10 Permit
1 b.
Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number: 14 or General Permit (GP) number:
1 c.
Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps?
❑ Yes N No
1 d.
Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply):
N 401 Water Quality Certification — Regular ❑ Non -404 Jurisdictional General Permit
❑ 401 Water Quality Certification — Express ❑ Riparian Buffer Authorization
le.
Is this notification solely for the record
because written approval is not required?
For the record only for DWQ
401 Certification:
❑ Yes N No
For the record only for Corps Permit:
❑ Yes N No
1f.
Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for mitigation
of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank or in -lieu
fee program.
❑ Yes N No
1 g.
Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties? If yes, answer 1 h
below.
❑ Yes N No
1 h.
Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)?
❑ Yes N No
2.
Project Information
2a.
Name of project:
Oakdale Road Widening Project
2b.
County:
Mecklenburg
2c.
Nearest municipality / town:
Charlotte
2d.
Subdivision name:
2e.
NCDOT only, T.I.P. or state project no:
3.
Owner Information
3a.
Name(s) on Recorded Deed:
Keziah, Kimberly; Woodmen of the World; Dellinger, Jack and Alma; Thuemmel, Linda and
Neil
3b.
Deed Book and Page No.
8579-413; 7997-807; 1239-77; 8381-18
3c.
Responsible Party (for LLC if
applicable):
N/A
3d.
Street address:
Oakdale Road, Charlotte, NC
3e.
City, state, zip:
Charlotte, NC 28216
3f.
Telephone no.:
3g.
Fax no.:
3h.
Email address:
Page 1 of 14
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

4. Applicant Information (if different from owner)
4a. Applicant is:
❑ Agent Other, specify: Local Government
4b. Name:
Ms. Leslie Bing
4c. Business name
(if applicable):
City of Charlotte Engineering and Property Management
4d. Street address:
600 E. Fourth Street
4e. City, state, zip:
Charlotte, NC 28202
4f. Telephone no.:
[phone]
4g. Fax no.:
N/A
4h. Email address:
[e-mail]
5. Agent/Consultant Information (if applicable)
5a. Name:
Gregg Antemann, PWS
5b. Business name
(if applicable):
Carolina Wetland Services, Inc.
5c. Street address:
550 E. Westinghouse Blvd.
5d. City, state, zip:
Charlotte, NC 28273
5e. Telephone no.:
704-408-1683
5f. Fax no.:
N/A
5g. Email address:
[e-mail]
Page 2 of 14
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

B.
Project Information and Prior Project History
1.
Property Identification
1a.
Property identification no. (tax PIN or parcel ID):
Multiple - Linear Transportation Project
1 b.
Site coordinates (in decimal degrees):
Latitude: 35.2877550 Longitude: -80.8924190
1 c.
Property size:
26.4 acres
2.
Surface Waters
2a.
Name of nearest body of water to proposed project:
Gum Branch
2b.
Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water:
WS- IV
2c.
River basin:
Catawba (HUC 03050101)
3.
Project Description
3a.
Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this
application:
The project corridor is approximately 26.4 acres in extent and is comprised of road right-of-way along Oakdale Road and
portions of adjacent single family residential and commercial properties with maintained lawns and asphalt parking lots.
Dominant vegetation within the project area consists of loblolly pine (Pinus taeda), boxelder (Acer negundo), multiflora rose
(Rosa multiflora), sawtooth blackberry (Rubus argutus), winged sumac (Rhus copallinum), sweetgum (Liquidambar
styraciflua), Chinese privet (Ligustrum sinense), Japanese honeysuckle (Lonicera japonica), and Canada goldenrod
(Solidago altissima).
3b.
List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property: 0 acre of jurisdictional wetland areas
3c.
List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property: 437 If perennial stream
3d.
Explain the purpose of the proposed project:
Oakdale Road is a minor thoroughfare located in northwest Charlotte approximately five miles from the central business
district. The purpose of this project is to upgrade Oakdale Road to a complete urban "Avenue Type" street with intermittent
landscaped medians and median divided left turn lanes. The project is necessary to reduce speeds and improve public
safety along Oakdale Road.
As a part of the upgrade of Oakdale Road the drainage system for the road will also be upgraded to convey the 25 -year
storm event per City of Charlotte design standards. The existing 60" Reinforced Concrete Pipe (RCP) under Oakdale Road
at 1320 Oakdale Road will be replaced with a 72" RCP. Riprap aprons will be installed upstream and downstream of the
culvert for energy dissipation entering and exiting the pipe.
In addition, the existing 48 -inch RCP that parallels Peachtree Road, west of Oakdale Road, will be replaced with a 54 -inch
RCP of the same length and a riprap apron will be installed at the outlet.
Page 3 of 14
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

3e. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
Unavoidable impacts to Jurisdictional Waters of the U.S. under Nationwide Permit Number 14 total 170 linear feet of impacts
to RPW Stream A and 25 linear feet of impacts to Seasonal RPW Stream B.
Impacts to RPW Stream A include 124 linear feet of permanent impacts and approximately 46 linear feet of temporary
impacts. Impacts to RPW Stream B include approximately 20 linear feet of permanent impacts and 5 linear feet of temporary
impacts. No single crossing exceeds 150 linear feet of permanent impact to a jurisdictional water of the U.S.
Permanent impacts to RPW Stream A are the result of 69 linear feet of pipe extension and 55 linear feet of riprap apron to
be installed upstream and downstream of the new pipe for energy dissipation purposes (Figure 8, attached). The existing
60 -inch RCP under Oakdale Road at 1320 Oakdale Road will be replaced with 54 linear feet of 72 -inch RCP. Junction
boxes will be installed upstream and downstream of this pipe, and an additional 30 linear feet of 72 -inch RCP will be installed
at the upstream and downstream ends of the pipe system (Figure 8, attached). The new pipe system will be 115 linear feet
in length with a net permanent impact length of 69 linear feet (Figure 8, attached). Additionally, a 15 -linear foot riprap apron
will be installed at the upstream end of the pipe system, and a 40 -linear foot riprap apron will be installed at the downstream
end. These riprap aprons are necessary to dissipate the energy of the water entering and exiting the culvert and to protect
the stream bed from erosion.
Smaller side systems will be tying to the new 72 -inch diameter pipes at the proposed new junction boxes. Because of this,
City of Charlotte requests a waiver from the General Condition No. 3.6.1 as the proposed new pipe system will not be buried
(Figure 8, attached). The current system has not been buried.
There are two proposed side connections at each of these junction boxes ranging in size from 15 -inch to 24 -inch diameter
pipes. These side systems will have inverts that are significantly higher than the inverts of the boxes, with drops ranging
from three to eight feet. If the proposed 72 -inch diameter pipe were to be buried in order to create a natural bottom, there
would be significant erosion of the natural bottom within the junction boxes during every storm event because of these side
system drops. This would create an unstable bottom, and would result in scour, turbidity, and the deposition of the eroded
sediment load in the channel downstream. As this would create a permanently unstable condition within the pipe, it was
determined that the most environmentally sensitive option would be the one that is currently proposed in the plans (see
Figure 8, attached).
Permanent impacts to Seasonal RPW Stream B total approximately 15 linear feet and consist of riprap apron and grading
(Figure 9 attached). The existing 48 -inch RCP will be replaced with a 54 -inch RCP of the same length. The pipe to be
replaced outfalls from the closed system into the beginning of the Stream A, and it is not carrying a stream like a culvert.
Therefore, the pipe replacement doesn't need to be buried. The stream channel will be regraded for 45 linear feet
downstream of the pipe to eliminate the existing unstable headcut. The existing 25 -foot long, serviceable riprap apron will
be replaced with a 30 -foot -long riprap apron. This will result in a five linear feet net permanent impact due riprap and 15
linear feet net permanent impact due grading.
Temporary impacts to RPW Stream A total 46 linear feet and are the result of the sediment traps. Temporary impacts to
RPW Stream B total five linear feet and are the result of sediment traps. Details of the temporary erosion control measures
are attached (Construction Detail Sheets EC1 and EC2, Attachment J).
Page 4 of 14
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

4. Jurisdictional Determinations
4a. Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the
❑x Yes ❑ No ❑ Unknown
Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property /
project (including all prior phases) in the past?
Comments: Features have been verified but a
determination has not been issued.
4b. If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination, what type
❑ PreliminaryEl Final
of determination was made?
4c. If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas?
Agency/Consultant Company: Carolina Wetland Services
Name (if known):
(CWS)
4d. If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation.
The site was originally delineated On February 4, 2013 and a Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination was requested along
with the Nationwide Permit No. 14 application. On May 29, 2013 the Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) issued the 404
Verification for 129 If of permanent impacts and 47 If of temporary impacts (SAW 2013-00714; Attachment C). The permit
expired March 18, 2017. North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality (NCDEQ) issued the Water Quality
Certification on June 11, 2013 (DWQ# 13-0398; Attachment D). This PCN is a request for reauthorization of a of a previously
permitted project. Minor revisions to the proposed grading limits and rip rap aprons have been made since the permits were
previously approved.
5. Project History
5a. Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for
N Yes ❑ No ❑ Unknown
this project (including all prior phases) in the past?
5b. If yes, explain in detail according to "help file" instructions.
On May 29, 2013 the Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) issued the 404 Verification for 129 If of permanent impacts and 47 If of
temporary impacts (SAW 2013-00714; Attachment C). The permit expired March 18, 2017. North Carolina Department of
Environmental Quality (NCDEQ) issued the Water Quality Certification on June 11, 2013 (DWQ# 13-0398; Attachment D). This
PCN is a request for reauthorization of a of a previously permitted project. Minor revisions to the proposed grading limits and rip
rap aprons have been made since the permits were previously approved.
6. Future Project Plans
6a. Is this a phased project?
❑ Yes ® No
6b. If yes, explain.
Page 5 of 14
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

C. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
1 a. Which sections were completed below for your project (check all that apply):
® Wetlands © Streams — tributaries ❑ Buffers ❑ Open Waters ❑ Pond Construction
2. Wetland Impacts
If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted.
2a.
Wetland impact
number
Permanent (P) or
Temporary (T)
2b.
Type of impact
2c.
Type of wetland
2d.
Forested
2e.
Type of jurisdiction
Corps (404,10) or
DWQ (401, other)
2f. Area
of
impact
(acres)
W1
_
W2
_
W3
_
W4
W5
W6
2g. Total Wetland Impacts:
2h. Comments:
3. Stream Impacts
If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this
question for all stream sites impacted.
3a.
Stream impact
number
Permanent (P) or
Temporary (T)
3b.
Type of impact
3c.
Stream name
3d.
Perennial (PER) or
intermittent (INT)?
3e.
Type of
jurisdiction
3f.
Average
stream
width
(feet)
3g.
Impact
length
(linear
feet)
S1
P
Culvert Extension
Stream A
PER
404
3-5
69
S2
P
Rip Rap Apron
Stream A
PER
404
3-5
55
S3
T
Sediment traps
Stream A
PER
404
3-5
26
S4
T
Sediment traps
Stream A
PER
404
3-5
20
S5
P
Riprap Apron
Stream B
PER
404
4-6
5
S6
P
Channel Grading
Stream B
PER
404
4-6
15
S7
T
Sediment traps
Stream B
PER
404
4-6
5
3h. Total stream and tributary impacts
195 If
Page 6 of 14
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

3i. Comments:
144 If of permanent impacts and 51 If of temporary impacts
Page 7 of 14
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

4. Open Water Impacts
If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of
the U.S. then individually list all open water impacts below.
4a.
Open water
impact number
Permanent (P) or
Temporary (T)
4b.
Name of waterbody
(if applicable
4c.
Type of impact
4d.
Waterbody
type
4e.
Area of impact (acres)
01
_
Choose One
Choose
02
_
Choose One
Choose
03
-
Choose One
Choose
04
-
Choose One
Choose
4f. Total open water impacts
4g. Comments:
5. Pond or Lake Construction
If pond or lake construction proposed, then complete the chart below.
5a.
Pond ID number
5b.
Proposed use or
purpose of pond
5c.
Wetland Impacts (acres)
5d.
Stream Impacts (feet)
5e.
Upland
(acres)
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
P1
Choose One
P2
Choose One
5f. Total:
5g. Comments:
5h. Is a dam high hazard permit required?
❑ Yes ❑ No If yes, permit ID no:
5i. Expected pond surface area (acres):
5j. Size of pond watershed (acres):
5k. Method of construction:
6. Buffer Impacts (for DWQ)
If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below. If yes, then individually list all buffer impacts
below. If any impacts require mitigation, then you MUST fill out Section D of this form.
6a. Project is in which protected basin?
❑ Neuse ❑ Tar -Pamlico ❑ Catawba ❑ Randleman ❑ Other:
6b.
Buffer Impact
number-
Permanent (P) or
Temporary T
6c.
Reason for impact
6d.
Stream name
6e.
Buffer
mitigation
required?
6f.
Zone 1
impact
(square
feet)
6g.
Zone 2
impact
(square
feet)
B1
-
Yes/No
B2
-
Yes/No
133
-
Yes/No
B4
-
Yes/No
B5
_
Yes/No
B6
_
Yes/No
6h. Total Buffer Impacts:
6i. Comments:
Page 8 of 14
PCN Form - Version 1.4 January 2009

D.
Impact Justification and Mitigation
1.
Avoidance and Minimization
1 a.
Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project.
Impacts to on-site jurisdictional waters of the U.S. have been reduced to the maximum extent possible. Proper sediment
and erosion control measures will be used to minimize disturbances to downstream waters. All work will be constructed
in the dry in accordance with Water Quality Certification No. 4088.
Piping of jurisdictional stream channel has been limited to 69 linear feet, the minimum necessary to facilitate the road
shoulder and embankment. Headwalls will be used to limit culvert lengths to the maximum extent practicable. Riprap
apron lengths have also been minimized to the greatest extent practicable while still meeting Charlotte Department of
Transportation standards.
Proposed Stream B outfall is located in the same location as existing, only five new linear feet of rip rap is being used to
supplement currently serviceable.
1 b.
Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques.
Proper sediment and erosion control measures will be used to minimize disturbances to downstream waters. Construction
activities and impacts to on-site jurisdictional waters of the U.S. will comply with all conditions of Nationwide Permits 14
and Water Quality Certificate No. 4088. All work will be constructed in dry and all temporary fill will be removed following
the work.
2.
Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a.
Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for
❑ Yes ❑x No
impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State?
2b.
If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply):
❑ DWQ ❑ Corps
❑ Mitigation bank
2c.
If yes, which mitigation option will be used for this
project?
❑ Payment to in -lieu fee program
❑ Permittee Responsible Mitigation
3.
Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank
3a.
Name of Mitigation Bank:
Type: Choose One
Quantity:
3b.
Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter)
Type: Choose One
Quantity:
Quantity:
Type: Choose One
3c.
Comments:
4.
Complete if Making a Payment to In -lieu Fee Program
Page 9 of 14
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

4a. Approval letter from in -lieu fee program is attached.
❑ Yes
4b.
Stream mitigation requested:
4c.
If using stream mitigation, stream temperature:
Choose One
4d.
Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only):
square feet
4e.
Riparian wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4f.
Non -riparian wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4g.
Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4h.
Comments:
5.
Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
5a.
If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan.
6.
Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) — required by DWQ
6a.
Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires
buffer mitigation?
❑ Yes © No
6b.
If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation. Calculate the
amount of mitigation required.
Zone
6c.
Reason for impact
6d.
Total impact
(square feet)
Multiplier
6e.
Required mitigation
(square feet)
Zone 1
3 (2 for Catawba)
Zone 2
1.5
6f. Total buffer mitigation required:
6g.
If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e.g., payment to private mitigation bank,
permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in -lieu fee fund).
6h.
Comments:
Page 10 of 14
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

E.
Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ)
1.
Diffuse Flow Plan
1 a.
Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified
❑ Yes ® No
within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
1 b.
If yes, then is a diffuse flow plan included? If no, explain why.
❑ Yes ❑ No
2.
Stormwater Management Plan
2a.
What is the overall percent imperviousness of this project?
N/A
2b.
Does this project require a Stormwater Management Plan?
❑ Yes M No
2c.
If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why:
Linear Transportation project.
2d.
If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan, then provide a brief, narrative
description of the plan:
2e.
Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan?
3.
Certified Local Government Stormwater Review
3a.
In which local government's jurisdiction is this project?
❑ Phase II
3b.
Which of the following locally -implemented stormwater management programs
❑ NSW
apply (check all that apply):
❑ USMP
❑ Water Supply Watershed
❑ Other:
3c.
Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
❑ Yes ❑ No
attached?
4.
DWQ Stormwater Program Review
❑ Coastal counties
El HQWEl
4a.
Which of the following state -implemented stormwater management programs apply
ORW
(check all that apply):
❑ Session Law 2006-246
❑ Other:
4b.
Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
❑ Yes ❑ No
attached?
5.
DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review
5a.
Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements?
❑ Yes ❑ No
5b.
Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met?
❑ Yes ❑ No
Page 11 of 14
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

F.
Supplementary Information
1.
Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement)
1 a.
Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the
N Yes
❑ No
use of public (federal/state) land?
1 b.
If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an
environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State
❑ Yes
N No
(North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
1 c.
If you answered "yes" to the above, has the document review been finalized by the
State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval
letter.)
❑ Yes
❑ No
Comments:
2.
Violations (DWQ Requirement)
2a.
Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated
Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards,
❑ Yes
N No
or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)?
2b.
Is this an after -the -fact permit application?
❑ Yes
N No
2c.
If you answered "yes" to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s):
3.
Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement)
3a.
Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in
❑ Yes
N No
additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?
3b.
If you answered "yes" to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the
most recent DWQ policy. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
The project will not result in additional future development as there is an existing road.
4.
Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement)
4a.
Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non -discharge or discharge) of wastewater
generated from
the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
N/A
Page 12 of 14
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or
❑ Yes N No
habitat?
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act
❑ Yes N No
impacts?
5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted.
-
5d. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical
Habitat?
CWS scientists performed a data review using North Carolina Natural Heritage Program (NCNHP) Data Explorer on
October 26, 2017 to determine the presence of any federally -listed, candidate endangered, threatened species, or critical
habitat located within the project area. Based on the NCNHP review, there are no records of federally -protected species
within the project limits. Within a mile of the project area, there is one element occurrence record for the Carolina
heelsplitter (Lasmigona decorata). A copy of the NCNHP report is attached (Attachment 1). There is no suitable habitat
for Carolina heelsplitter within the project area.
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat?
❑ Yes N No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat?
NOAA Fisheries: http://www.habitat.noaa.gov/protection/efh/habitatmapper.html
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal
governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation
❑ Yes N No
status (e.g., National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in
North Carolina history and archaeology)?
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?
A letter was forwarded to the North Carolina State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO) on February 25, 2013 to determine
the presence of any areas of architectural, historic, or archaeological significance that would be affected by the project.
CWS also consulted the SHPO online GIS service a Charlotte -Mecklenburg Historic Landmarks Commission's webpage
and found no historical structures, buildings, sites, or districts within the project limits. In a response letter dated March
12, 2013, the SHPO states that they "are aware of no historic resources which would be affected by the project. Therefore,
we have no comment on the project as proposed." A copy of the SHPO response letter is attached (Attachment H).
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA -designated 100 -year floodplain?
❑ Yes N No
8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements:
There will be no fill in the FEMA floodplain.
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination? FEMA FIRM No. FEMA FIRM No. 3710453600J
Page 13 of 14
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

C_
Mr. Gregg Antemann AL-�� 11.27.17
Applicant/Agent's Signature (Agent's
Applicant/Agent's Printed Name signature is valid only if an authorization letter Date
from the applicant is provided.)
Page 14 of 14
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

Oakdale Road Widening Project
Attachments
ATTACHMENT C:
November 1, 2017
CWS Project No. 2017-0505
404 General Permit Verification

U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
WILMINGTON DISTRICT
Action ID. 2013-00714 County: USGS Quad: fountain Island Lake
GENERAL PERMIT (RE GIONAL AND NATIONWIDE) VERIFICATION
Property Owner / Authorized Agent: City of Charlotte Eni[►eerin Property fanae►nent
Attn: Leslie Ping
Address: 600 Last Fourth Street
Charlotte NC 28202
Telephone No.: 704-336-7277
Size and location of property (water body, road name/number, town, etc.): This site is located on
Oakdale Road in Chaplotte, Mecldenbur Countyg NC.
Description of projects area and activity: This permit authorizes ianpacts associated with culvert
replacerraent/extension and rip rap placement far the Oakdale Road Widening Project. See the table
below for a more detailed description of impacts.
Impact ID # NWP / Open Water (ac)
GP # Temporary Permanent
Wetland (ac) Stream (10
Temporary Permanent Temporary Permanent
Stream A 14
20 124
Stream B 14
27 5
Impact Totals
47 129
Total Loss of Waters of the U.S. (ac)
Total Loss of Waters of the U.S. (If) 129
Required Wetland
Mitigation (ac)
Required Stream Mitigation (If)
0
Applicable Law: ® Section 404 (Clean Water Act, 33 USC 1344)
❑ Section 10 (Rivers and Harbors Act, 33 USC 403)
Authorization: Regional General Permit Number:
Nationwide Permit Number: 14
Your work is authorized by the above referenced permit provided it is accomplished in strict accordance with
the attached conditions and your submitted plans. Any violation of the attached conditions or deviation from
your submitted plans may subject the permittee to a stop work order, a restoration order and/or appropriate
legal action.
This verification will remain valid until the expiration date identified below unless the nationwide authorization
is modified, suspended or revoked. If, prior to the expiration date identified below, the nationwide permit
authorization is reissued and/or modified, this verification will remain valid until the expiration date identified
below, provided it complies with all requirements of the modified nationwide permit. If the nationwide permit
authorization expires or is suspended, revoked, or is modified, such that the activity would no longer comply with
the terns and conditions of the nationwide permit, activities which have commenced (i.e., are under construction) or
are under contract to commence in reliance upon the nationwide permit, will remain authorized provided the activity
is completed within twelve months of the date of the nationwide permit's expiration, modification or revocation,
unless discretionary authority has been exercised on a case-by-case basis to modify, suspend or revoke the
authorization.
Activities subject to Section 404 (as indicated above) may also require an individual Section 401 Water Quality
Certification. You should contact the NC Division of Water Quality (telephone [phone]) to determine
Section 401 requirements. You may also visit their website at: http://portal.ncdenr.org/web/wq/swp/ws/webscape
For activities occurring within the twenty coastal counties subject to regulation under the Coastal Area
Management Act (CAMA), prior to beginning work you must contact the N.C. Division of Coastal Management.

This Department of the Army verification does not relieve the permittee of the responsibility to obtain any other
required Federal, State or local approvals/permits.
If there are any questions regarding this verification, any of the conditions of the Pennit, or the Corps of
Engineers regulatory program, please contact Amanda Fuemmeler at 828-271-7980.
Corps Regulatory Official Amanda Fuemmeler Date: A/Iay 29g 2013X
Expiration Date of Verification: Larch 18g 2017
*Date reflects 45 days from the date a complete application was received.
The Wilmington District is committed to providing the highest level of support to the public. To help us ensure we
continue to do so, please complete the Customer Satisfaction Survey located at our website at
http:// er2.nwp.usace.army.mil/surve .html to complete the survey online.
A. ® Based on preliminary information, there appear to be waters of the US including wetlands within the above
described project area. This preliminary determination is not an appealable action under the Regulatory
Program Administrative Appeal Process ( Reference 33 CFR Part 331).
B. ❑ There are Navigable Waters of the United States within the above described project area subject to the
permit requirements of Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act and Section 404 of the Clean Water Act.
Unless there is a change in the law or our published regulations, this determination may be relied upon for a
period not to exceed five years from the date of this notification.
C. ❑ There are waters of the US within the above described project area subject to the pen -nit requirements of
Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (CWA)(33 USC § 1344). Unless there is a change in the law or our
published regulations, this determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years fi-om the date
of this notification.
D. ❑ The jurisdictional areas within the above described project area have been identified under a previous action.
Please reference jurisdictional determination issued . Action ID
Copy Furnished:
Carolina Wetland Services, Inc., Attn: Thomas Blackwell, 550 E. Westinghouse Blvd., Charlotte, NC
28273

Permit Number: 2013-00714
Permit Type: NW14 / Oakdale Road Widening Project
Name of County: Mecklenburg
Name of Pernlittee: City of Charlotte Engineering & Property Management
Attn: Leslie Bing
Date of Issuance: May 29, 2013
Project Manager: Amanda Puemmeler
Upon completion of the activity authorized by this pen -nit and any mitigation required by the
pennit, sign this certification and return it to the following address:
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Attention: CESAW-RG-A
151 Patton Avenue, Room 208
Asheville, North Carolina 28801-5006
Please note that your permitted activity is subject to a compliance inspection by an U.S. Arany
Corps of Engineers representative. If you fail to comply with this permit you are subject to
permit suspension, modification, or revocation.
I hereby certify that the work authorized by the above referenced pen -nit has been completed in
accordance with the terms and conditions of the said permit, and required mitigation was
completed in accordance with the permit conditions.
Signature of Permittee
Date

Oakdale Road Widening Project
Attachments
ATTACHMENT D:
November 1, 2017
CWS Project No. 2017-0505
401 Water Quality Certification

North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Pat McCrory Thomas A. Reeder John E. Skvarla, III
Governor Acting Director Secretary
June 11, 2013
DWQ 13-0393
Mecklenburg County
Oakdale Road Widening
You have our approval, in accordance with the general certification and those conditions listed below,
for the purpose proposed in your application dated April 2, 2013, and subsequent information submitted on
June 4, 2013, and received by the Division of Water Quality (the Division) on April 15, 2013, and June 10,
2013, respectively.. After reviewing your application, we have determined that this project is covered by Water
Quality General-- • •er 3883 and 3885, which can be viewed on our ^i site at
http://portal.ncdenr,oEg/web/wq/swp/ws/401 ' The General Certification allows you to use Nationwide Permit
Numbers 3 and 27once they are issued to you by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. Please note that you
should get any other federal, state or local permits before proceeding with your project, including those
required by (but not limited to) Sediment and Erosion Control, Non -Discharge, and Water Supply Watershed
regulations. The above noted Certification will expire when the associated 404 permit expires unless otherwise
specified in the General Certification and conditions below*
The Mooresville Regional Office shall be notified in writing once construction at the approved impact areas
has commenced.
Type of Impact Amount Approved Amount Approved
Temporary Impact Permanent Impact
Stream 47 linear ft 129 linear ft.
Wetland 0 0
certification.3.This approval is only valid for the purpose and design that you described in your application. If you chan
your project, you must notify us in writing, and you may be required to send us a new application for a ne
property is sold, the new owner be given a copy of - i and approval
therebyletter; and is •• • for • i with all conditions.
Mooresville Regional Office One
Location: 610 East Center Avenue, Suite 301, Mooresville, NC 28115 NorthCarofina
Phone: [phone]\Fax: [phone]\ Customer Service: 1-877-623-6748
Internet: http://portal.ncdenr.org/web/wq Nawrallff
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer — 50% Recycled/10% Post Consumer Paper

5. Culverts placed in stream s/wetla nds shall be installed "in the dry". Immediately upon completion of the
installation, water flow shall be returned to its natural course. Existing stream dimensions (including th,#,
cross section dimensions, pattern, and longitudinal profile) must be maintained (or restored via
constructed benches) above and below locations of each culvert. If any of the existing pipes are or
become perched, the appropriate stream grade shall be re-established or, if the pipes installed in a
perched manner, the pipes shallbe • -• and -• correctly.
6. Use of native vegetation and other soft stream bank stabilization techniques must be used where practicable
instead of riprap or other bank hardening methods. If riprap is necessary, it shall not be placed in the
streambed, unless approved by M
7. Stormwater discharge structures at this site shall be constructed in a manner such that the potential receiving
streams (of the discharge) will not be impacted due to sediment accumulations, scouring or erosion of the
stream banks.
3. Upon completion of the project, the applicant shall complete and return the enclosed "Certificate of
Completion" form to the 401NVetlands Unit of the NC ®WQ. Please send photographs of the upstream and
downstream sides of each culvert site to document correct installation, along with the Certificate of
Completion form.
9. Continuing Compliance. The applicant (City of Charlotte) shall conduct all activities in a manner so as not to
contravene any state water quality standard (including any requirements for compliance with section 303(d)
of the Clean Water Act) and any other appropriate requirements of state and federal law. If ®WQ determines
that such standards or laws are not being met (including the failure to sustain a designated or achieved use)
or that state or federal law is being violated, or that further conditions are necessary to assure compliance,
®WQ may reevaluate and modify this certification to include conditions appropriate to assure compliance with
such standards and requirements in accordance with 15 A NCAC 2H.0507(d). Before codifying the
certification, ®WQ shall notify the applicant and the US Army Corps of Engineers, provide public notice in
accordance with 15A NCAC 2H.0503, and provide opportunity for public hearing in accordance with 15A
NCAC 2H.0504. Any new or revised conditions shall be provided to the applicant in writing, shall be provided
to the United States Army Corps of Engineers for reference in any permit issued pursuant to Section 404 of
the Clean Water Act, and shall also become conditions of the 404 Permit for the project.
This Certification can be contested as provided in Articles 3 and 4 of the General Statute 1505 by filing a
written petition to the Office of Administrative Hearing (hereby known as OAH). A petition form may be
obtained from the OAH at: htta.//www.ncoah.com/ or by calling the OAH Clerk's at 919-431-3000. Within
sixty (60) calendar days of receipt of this notice, a petition must be filed with the office of OAH. A petition is
considered filed when the original and one (1) copy along with any applicable OAH filing fee is received during
OAH's normal office hours (Monday through Friday between the hours of 3:00am and 5:00pm, except for
official state holidays).
The petition may be faxed to (919-431-3100) provided the original and one copy of the document is received
by the OAH within five (5) business days following the faxed transmission. The mailing address for the OAH is:
If sending via US Postal Service: If sending via delivery service (UPS, FedEx, etc.)
Office of Administrative Hearings Office of Administrative Hearings
6714 Mail Service Center 1711 New Hope Church Rd.
Raleigh, NC 27699-6714 Raleigh, NC 27609-6265

IFE :1.© ffill !I INII g I I 1 1 111
'Ar. Lacy Presnell, General Counsel
#,epartment of Environment and Natural Resources
1601 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1601
This letter completes the review of DWQ under Section 401 of the Clean Water Act. If you have any
questions, please telephone Mr. Alan Johnson in the Mooresville Regional Office at 704-663-1699 or Ms. Karen
Higgins in the Central Office in Raleigh 919-807-6360.
Sincerely
for Thomas A. Reeder
W=
cc: Army Corps of Engineers, Asheville
Karen Higgins, Wetlands Unit
MRO, Land Quality
Gregg Antemann, CWS
DWQ# 13-0398

Oakdale Road Widening Project
Attachments
ATTACHMENT E:
November 1, 2017
CWS Project No. 2017-0505
NCDEQ Stream Classification Forms (SCP1-SCP2)

NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
Date: (j - t !
ProjectlSite: ;kdc [ [
Latitude: 2S L 9! S $
Evaluator: �]/( ��.
County: CG�CI t'n
Longitude: - �}, QI j2�4s
!
Total Points:
at stlntermit' 33
Stream Determination (circle
Ephemeral Intermittent erennia
Other'' e� /�
e.g. Quad Name:
ifStr
if z 19 orperennial rf ? 30*
19rrrperens
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
5q?
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal = f }
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
1" Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
16. Organic debris lines or piles
2
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple -pool sequence
0
1
2
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
1
3
5. Active/relict floodplain
0
1
1
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
n1
0.5
2
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
0.5 1
2
3
8. Headcuts
0
1
2
3
9. Grade control
0
0.5
1
.5
10. Natural valley
0
.5
1
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
No = 0
Yes 3
- artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hvdroloqv (Subtotal = t I )
12. Presence of Baseflow
0 1
2 3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0 1
2 3
14. Leaf litter
a1
0.5 0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0 0.5
V 1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0 1 0.5
1 1 C5D
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
Yes 3
C. Biology (Subtotal =
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
2
1
0
19. Hooted upland plants in streambed
2
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
0
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
0
1
2
3
22. Fish
0
0.5
1
1,5
23. Crayfish
0
0.5
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
0
0.5
1.5
25, Algae
0.5 1
1 1
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75; OBL =
1.5 Other = 0
*perennial streams may also be identified using other methods.
See p. 35 of manual.
Notes:
Sketch:

NC DWO Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
Date: % () - I - I
ProjectlSite; a kok It G j WA
Latitude: `' 5' 2- 7' 6 �
Evaluator: AV D}
County: C�kI�
Longitude:
Total alntS:
Streams at least intermittent
i
3t
Stream Determination (circe ne l
Ephemeral Intermittenterennial
Other 5fYec^ U
e.g. Quad Name:
rf�t99orperennialif?30*
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
_SL 2-
A.
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal = l) • ] )
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
I" Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
Z
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple -pool sequence
0
1
2
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
23Q
1.5
5. Active/relict floodplain
0
(D
2
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
60
2
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
e1
2
3
8. Headcuts
0
D
2
3
9: Grade control
0
0.5
1
�a
10. Natural valley
0 1
0.5
0 1
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
Na
0
Yes = 3
artiticial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Wdrolociv (Subtotal=
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
1
0
3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
1
2
3
14. Leaf litter
15
1
0.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
0.5
1
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
0.5
1.5
1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
1
No = 0
Yes K.3
0.5
C. Bioloqv (Subtotal= 9, )
18. Fibrous roots in streambed 3
2
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed 3
2
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance) 0
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks 0
2
3
22. Fish
0.5
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
0.5
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
0.5
1
1.5
25. Algae
0.5
1 1 1
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed I
FAGW = 0.75;
OBL = 1.5 Other = 0
}perennial streams may also be identified using other methods, See p. 35 of manual.
Notes:
Sketch:

Oakdale Road Widening Project
Attachments
ATTACHMENT F:
November 1, 2017
CWS Project No. 2017-0505
USACE Wetland Determination Data Form (DP1)

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
Project/Site: Oakdale Road Widening City/County: Mecklneburg Sampling Date: 10-18-17
Applicant/Owner: City of Charlotte, POC: Ms. Leslie Bing State: NC Sampling Point: DP1
Investigator(s): AVH & SAM Section, Township, Range: Charlotte
Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.): terrace Local relief (concave, convex, none): Concave Slope (%): 2-8
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P, MLRA 136 Lat: 35.292753 Long: -80.891707 Datum: NAD83
Soil Map Unit Name: Cecil sandy clay loam, 2-8% slopes (CeB2) NWI classification: N/A
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No X Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X within a Wetland? Yes No X
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
Remarks:
Data point is representative of non -jurisdictional upland areas
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply)
—Surface Soil Cracks (66)
—Surface Water (Al) —True
Aquatic Plants (1314)
—Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
_ High Water Table (A2) —Hydrogen
Sulfide Odor (Cl)
—Drainage Patterns (1310)
_Saturation (A3) _Oxidized
Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
_Moss Trim Lines (1316)
—Water Marks (61) —Presence
of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
_Sediment Deposits (132) _Recent
Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
_Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_Drift Deposits (133) _Thin
Muck Surface (C7)
_Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_Algal Mat or Crust (134) _Other
(Explain in Remarks)
_Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
_ Iron Deposits (135)
_ Geomorphic Position (D2)
_ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
—Shallow Aquitard (D3)
—Water -Stained Leaves (139)
—Microtopographic Relief (D4)
Aquatic Fauna (1313)
FAC -Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
Indicators of wetland hydrology are not present.
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
40 =Total Cover
50% of total cover: 20 20% of total cover: 8
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5 )
1. Festuca sp. 75 Yes
2. Lonicera japonica 10 No FACU
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
85 =Total Cover
50% of total cover: 43 20% of total cover: 17
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30 )
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
=Total Cover
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover:
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
16.7 % of dominant vegetation is FAC or wetter.
Sampling Point: DP1
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 1 (A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: 6 (B)
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 16.7% (A/B)
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
OBL species x 1 =
FACW species x 2 =
FAC species x 3 =
FACU species x 4 =
UPL species x 5 =
Column Totals: (A) (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A =
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
-2 - Dominance Test is >50%
_ 3 - Prevalence Index is :53.01
4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be
present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft
(1 m) tall.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
Woody Vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
height.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes No X
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0
ADSOIULe
uominani
Inaicaic
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30 )
% Cover
Species?
Status
1. Quercus phellos
10
Yes
FAC
2. Liriodendron tulipifera
10
Yes
FACU
3. Cornus florida
10
Yes
FACU
4.
5.
6.
7.
30
=Total Cover
50% of total cover:
15 20% of total cover:
6
Saplinq/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15
)
1. Ulmus alata
20
Yes
FACU
2. Juniperus virginiana
20
Yes
FACU
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
40 =Total Cover
50% of total cover: 20 20% of total cover: 8
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5 )
1. Festuca sp. 75 Yes
2. Lonicera japonica 10 No FACU
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
85 =Total Cover
50% of total cover: 43 20% of total cover: 17
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30 )
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
=Total Cover
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover:
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
16.7 % of dominant vegetation is FAC or wetter.
Sampling Point: DP1
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 1 (A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: 6 (B)
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 16.7% (A/B)
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
OBL species x 1 =
FACW species x 2 =
FAC species x 3 =
FACU species x 4 =
UPL species x 5 =
Column Totals: (A) (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A =
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
-2 - Dominance Test is >50%
_ 3 - Prevalence Index is :53.01
4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be
present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft
(1 m) tall.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
Woody Vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
height.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes No X
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

SOIL
Sampling Point: DP1
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Types Loc2 Texture Remarks
0-12 7.5YR 6/6 100 Loamy/Clayey
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains
Hydric Soil Indicators:
_ Histosol (Al)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2)
—Black Histic (A3)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
—Stratified Layers (A5)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
_ Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
_Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
_Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1)
—Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
—Sandy Redox (S5)
—Stripped Matrix (S6)
Dark Surface (S7)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type: Rock
Depth (inches): 12
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
_Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
—Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (MLRA 136)
_ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
_ Depleted Matrix (F3)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
_ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_ Redox Depressions (F8)
_ Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 136)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 122, 136)
—Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147, 148)
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
—Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
(MLRA 147, 148)
—Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
(MLRA 136, 147)
—Red Parent Material (F21)
(outside MLRA 127, 147, 148)
—Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
wetland hydrology must be present,
unless disturbed or problematic.
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X
Remarks:
This data form is revised from Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Regional Supplement Version 2.0 to include the NRCS Field Indicators of Hydric
Soils, Version 8.0, 2016.
Indicators for hydric soils are not present.
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0

Oakdale Road Widening Project
Attachments
ATTACHMENT G:
Photopage (Photographs 1-4)
November 1, 2017
CWS Project No. 2017-0505

Oakdale Road Widening Project November 27, 2017
Nationwide Permit No. 14 CWS Project No. 2017-0505
Photograph 1. View of RPW Stream A, facing upstream.
Photograph 2. View of RPW Stream A, facing upstream.
Photopage 1 of 2

izz
-
•i- 4W 410t
1p
n + _ , =� _ n+ i'a �`= 1 l Y i �1, ` /� l • Fly .. '
• �• -;- •����• ',�,}�• + R+". 'a: Cyt,• ,' �L �' -a"_"� y � � ,
40'-
���_ -yam .��y �r -'�� '`1 f * �, � + .• � `�
,v— •� �T � � . �� .r �-tom• �. , � � r � �.. 5�'� L
�'�' 1►•.�,; . �-., a '�`�� •� �•.• !tom' �'"`�

Oakdale Road Widening Project
Attachments
ATTACHMENT H:
SHPO Response
November 1, 2017
CWS Project No. 2017-0505

North Carolina Department of Cultural Resources
State Historic Preservation Office
Ramona M. Bartos, Administrator
Pat McCrory, Governor
Susan W. Kluttc, Secretary
Kevin Cherry, Deputy Secretary
March 12, 2013
Felly Hines
Carolina Wetland Services
550 East Westinghouse Boulevard
Charlotte, NC 28273
Office of Archives and History
Division of Historical Resources
David Brook, Director
Re: Oakdale Road Widening Project, Charlotte, CWS 2013-3093, Mecklenburg County, ER 13-0432
Dear Ms. Hines:
Thank you for letter of February 25, 2013, concerning the above project.
We have conducted a review of the project and are aware of no historic resources which would be affected by
the project. Therefore, we have no comment on the project as proposed.
The above comments are made pursuant to Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act and the
Advisory Council on Historic Preservation's Regulations for Compliance with Section 106 codified at 36 CFR
Part 800.
Thank you for your cooperation and consideration. If you have questions concerning the above comment,
please contact Renee Gledhill -Earley, environmental review coordinator, at 919-807-6579. In all future
communication concerning this project, please cite the above -referenced tracking number.
Sincerely,
4 Ramona M. Bartos
Location: 109 East Jones Street, Raleigh NC; 27601 Mailing Address: 4617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh NC 27699-46'17 Telephone/ Fax: [phone]-6599

Oakdale Road Widening Project
Attachments
ATTACHMENT I:
NCNHP Data Review Report
November 1, 2017
CWS Project No. 2017-0505

North Carolina Department of Natural and Cultural Resources
Natural Heritage Program
Governor Roy Cooper
October 26, 2017
Aliisa Harjuniemi
Carolina Wetland Services
550 E Westinghouse Blvd
Charlotte, NC 28273
RE: Oakdale Road Widening Project; 2017-0505
Dear Aliisa Harjuniemi:
Secretary Susi H. Hamilton
N C N H D E-4596
The North Carolina Natural Heritage Program (NCNHP) appreciates the opportunity to provide information
about natural heritage resources for the project referenced above.
A query of the NCNHP database, based on the project area mapped with your request, indicates that there are
no records for rare species, important natural communities, natural areas, or conservation/managed areas
within the proposed project boundary. Please note that although there may be no documentation of natural
heritage elements within the project boundary, it does not imply or confirm their absence; the area may not have
been surveyed. The results of this query should not be substituted for field surveys where suitable habitat exists.
In the event that rare species are found within the project area, please contact the NCNHP so that we may
update our records.
The attached `Potential Occurrences' table summarizes rare species and natural communities that have been
documented within a one -mile radius of the property boundary. The proximity of these records suggests that
these natural heritage elements may potentially be present in the project area if suitable habitat exists and is
included for reference. Tables of natural areas and conservation/managed area within a one -mile radius of the
project area, if any, are also included in this report.
Please note that natural heritage element data are maintained for the purposes of conservation planning, project
review, and scientific research, and are not intended for use as the primary criteria for regulatory decisions.
Information provided by the NCNHP database may not be published without prior written notification to the
NCNHP, and the NCNHP must be credited as an information source in these publications. Maps of NCNHP
data may not be redistributed without permission.
The NC Natural Heritage Program may follow this letter with additional correspondence if a Dedicated Nature
Preserve (DNP), Registered Heritage Area (RHA), Clean Water Management Trust Fund (CWMTF) easement,
or Federally -listed species are documented near the project area.
If you have questions regarding the information provided in this letter or need additional assistance, please
contact Rodney A. Butler at rod ney.butler o_ncdcr.gov or 919.707.8603.
Sincerely,
NC Natural Heritage Program
MAILING ADDRESS: Tele hone: [919', 7D7-8107 LOCA.TICN
16`1 MaiI Ser,rice Center �n�rr&ncnh2.org 121 VVest hones S-reat
Ralaigh, NC 27899-1881 Ralaigh, NC 27603

Natural Heritage Element Occurrences, Natural Areas, and Managed Areas Within a One -mile Radius of the Project Area
Oakdale Road Widening Project
Project No. 2017-0505
October 26, 2017
NCNHDE-4596
Element Occurrences Documented Within a One -mile Radius of the Project Area
Taxonomic EO ID
Scientific Name
Common Name
Last
Element
Group
Rank
Rank
Observation
Occurrence
G1
S1
5 -Very ---
Date
Rank
Freshwater 450
Lasmigona decorata
Carolina Heelsplitter
1918 -Pre
X
Bivalve
Vascular Plant 13743
Delphinium exaltatum
Tall Larkspur
1800s
Hi?
No Natural Areas are Documented Within a One -mile Radius of the Project Area
Managed Areas Documented Within a One -mile Radius of the Project Area
Managed Area Name Owner
Mecklenburg County Open Space Mecklenburg County
Accuracy Federal
State
Global
State
Status
Status
Rank
Rank
3 -Medium Endangered
Endangered
G1
S1
5 -Very ---
Endangered
G3
S2
Low
Owner Type
Local Government
Definitions and an explanation of status designations and codes can be found at https://ncnhde.natureserve.org/content/help. Data query generated on October 26, 2017; source: NCNHP, Q3 July 2017. Please resubmit your
information request if more than one year elapses before project initiation as new information is continually added to the NCNHP database.
Page 2 of 3

,5sanch
NCNHDE-4596: Oakdale Road Widening Project
October 26, 2017
❑ Project Boundary
❑ Buffered Project Boundary
0 Managed Area (MARBA)
r
5
t
n,
Gr��e � i Rads° Fd
n
8r rr
•
a
.847
o•
An
Or�
0.
Y
p
V`
d
ate n Rd
G
C•
f
Os Ferry Rd
v
a
o d�
a �
a r�
c
Ile 11 100
C s
ar " Charbne
C he mway r
Page 3 of 3
5urx�t I
1:29,928
6 0.25 0.5 1 mi
a a"a 0.8 16 km
Sources: Esn, HERE, CeLomre, Inl.—p, increment P Corp., GESCO, USGS,
FAO, NPS, NRCAN. Geo9ase. IGN, Kadas[er NL, Ordnance Survey, Esri Japan.
ME -r _ Esri Ching [Hong �n91- swis topo, Mapmylndia" ® Ope.n51ree1Map
LOnlnhul0rs, and [he GIS U., Commundy

Oakdale Road Widening Project
Attachments
ATTACHMENT J:
Construction Detail Sheets
November 1, 2017
CWS Project No. 2017-0505

®�nB®�e����®�nB®�sv��0'
IN ® ® O�'O�.•O�.•�VO® 000�1tO�Ot ® tl V' tl ® �000000e
GENERAL NOTES:
1. WOVEN FILTER FABRIC BE USED WHERE SILT FENCE IS TO REMAIN FOR A PERIOD OF
MORE THAN 30 DAYS.
2, STEEL POSTS SHALL BE 5'-0" IN HEIGHT AND BE OF THE SELF -FASTENER ANGLE STEEL
TYPE. MAINTENANCE NOTES:
5. TURN SILT FENCE UP SLOPE AT ENDS. 1. FILTER BARRIERS SHALL BE INSPECTED BY THE FINANCIALLY RESPONSIBLE PARTY
OR HIS AGENT IMMEDIATELY AFTER EACH RAINFALL AND AT LEAST DAILY DURING
D . ORANGE SAFETY FENCE IS REQUIRED AT BACK OF SILT FENCE WHEN GRADING IS PROLONGED RAINFALL. ANY REPAIRS NEEDED SHALL BE MADE IMMEDIATELY.
ADJACENT TO SWIM BUFFERS, STREAMS OR WETLANDS (REFER TO SWIM BUFFER
GUIDELINES). THE COLOR ORANGE IS RESERVED FOR VISUAL IDENTIFICATION OF 2, SHOULD THE FABRIC DECOMPOSE OR BECOME INEFFECTIVE PRIOR TO THE END
ENVIRONMENTALLY SENSITIVE AREAS. OF THE EXPECTED USABLE LIFE AND THE BARRIER STILL IS NECESSARY, THE
FABRIC SHALL BE REPLACED PROMPTLY.
5. DRAINAGE AREA CAN NOT BE GREATER THAN 1/4 ACRE PER 100 7 OF FENCE.
3, SEDIMENT DEPOSITS SHOULD BE REMOVED WHEN DEPOSITS REACH APPROX. HALF
6, SLOPE LENGTHS CAN NOT EXCEED CRITERIA SHOWN IN TABLE 6.62A NORTH CAROLINA THE HEIGHT OF THE BARRIER. ANY SEDIMENT DEPOSITS REMAINING IN PLACE
EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PLANNING AND DESIGN MANUAL. AFTER THE SILT FENCE IS REMOVED SHALL BE DRESSED TO CONFORM TO THE
EXISTING GRADE, PREPARED AND SEEDED.
T. DO NOT INSTALL SEDIMENT FENCE ACROSS STREAMS, DITCHES, WATERWAYS OR OTHER
AREAS OF CONCENTRATED FLOW.
• CITY OF CHARLOTTE
K� LAND DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS TEMPORARY SILT FENCE N
©NRLOTTE INCLUDES CHARLOTTE ETJ 30.06A 4
C
GENERAL NOTES:
1. UNIFORMLY GRADE A SHALLOW
DEPRESSION APPROACHING THE
INLET,
2. DRIVE 5 -FOOT STEEL POSTS 2
FEETINTO THE GROUND
SURROUNDING THE INLET, SPACE
POSTS EVENLY AROUND THE
PERME
ITER OF THE INLET, A
MAX MUM OF 4 FEET APART.
3 SURROUND THE POSTS WITH WIRE
MESH HARDWARE CLOTH. SECURE
THE WIRE MESH TO THE STEEL
POSTS AT THE TDP, MIDDLE, AND
BOTTOM PLACING A 2 -FOOT FLAP
OF THE WIRE MESH UNDER THE
GRAVEL FOR ANCHORING IS
RECOMMENDED,
4. PLACE CLEAN GRAVEL (NC DOT N5
OR N57 STONE) ON A 2:1 SLOPE
WITH A HEIGHT OF 16 INCHES
AROUND THE WIRE, AND SMOOTH TO
AN EVEN GRADE.
5. ONCE THE CONTRIBUTING DRAINAGE
AREA HAS BEEN STABILIZED,
REMOVE ACCUMULATED SEDIMENT,
AND ESTABLISH FINAL GRADING
ELEVATIONS.
6. COMPACT THE AREA PROPERLY AND
STABILIZED IT WITH
GROUNDCOVER.
NCDOT #5 OR
WASHED S
NCDOT #5 OR
WASHED S
1 4' MAX.
19 -GAUGE HARDWARE CLOTH
(J" MESH OPENINGS)
NOT TO S
• I CITY OF CHARLOTTE I HARDWARE CLOTH AND GRAVEL
�h LAND DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS INLET PROTECTION sro. No. REv.
©V►A►TE INCLUDES CHARLOTTE ETJ 30.09 1
• CITY OF CHARLOTTE
LAND DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS STONE INLET PROTECTION STD. ND. R
INCLUDES CHARLOTTE ETJ 30.08
GENERAL NOTES:
C
\ wnsHED 3J°NE
1. SEDIMENT SHALL BE REMOVED AND TRAP
#S �Mml
RESTORED TO ITS ORIGINAL DIMENSIONS
WHEN THE SEDIMENT HAS ACCUMULATED
A\
STORAGE
TO 1/2 THE DESIGN DEPTH OF THE TRAP.
AREA
2. REMOVED SEDIMENT SHALL BE DEPOSITED
IN A SUITABLE AREA AND IN SUCH A
o o
MANNER THAT IT WILL NOT ERODE.MM
e e
3. THE STRUCTURE SHALL BE INSPECTED BY
0 e
THE FINANCIALLY RESPONSIBLE PARTY OR
STRRRAAGE
A8v
HIS AGENT AFTER EACH STORM EVENT
CATCH
AND REPAIRS MADE AS NECESSARY.
BASIN
i
\
4. CONSTRUCTION OPERATIONS SHALL BE CARRIED
OUT IN SUCH A MANNER THAT EROSION AND
eee
WATER POLLUTION ARE MINIMIZED.
8gea
5. THE SEDIMENT TRAP SHALL BE REMOVED AND
/
\
THE AREA STABILIZED WHEN THE DRAINAGE
BASIN HAS BEEN PROPERLY STABILIZED.
P AN VIEW
6. ON LARGER DRAINAGE AREAS RIP RAP MAY
BE REQUIRED UNDER THE WASHED STONE.
_ ffi6TONEHED
Kw
Ka
ALpW
f
CATCH
BASIN
SECTION A
• CITY OF CHARLOTTE
LAND DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS STONE INLET PROTECTION STD. ND. R
INCLUDES CHARLOTTE ETJ 30.08

EXCELSIOR
WATTLE DETAIL
aLwe
isom YRxC VIEW
OF PAVEMENT
2' UMSLGPE
MANE TURAL GROUND
WTTI1h: J _� 2' DOMBLOPE
CROSS SECtION STAKE
YEE DITCH
2 IN, P' 11PSLOPE
FLOW
T 9 NATURAL GROUND
,
IEATT IHS -STAKE SLOPE
CROSS SECTION
TRAPEZOIDAL DITCH
NOTES:
OSE NINDIUM 12 IN, DIAMITIA E%LELSId! MTBE.
DSE 2 PT. NWDEN STAKES WITH A 2 IN. GT 2 IN. NDNINAL
CNOES SECTION.
pR�( IMTA METLELS) To A NI 10 GIT0 0 FIN WILL Nor
MSX "rAJO -ME AMd SOMS ll'tCH SLOPES AND AS DIMCTIII
INSTALL A YINIMAI IF 2 OP9LGFE STAKES AND i DONISlDPE
STAKES AT AN ANDLE TO 11E NAME TO NFIG4 OF DITCH,
H IDE STAPLES MADE OF 0.123 IN. DIAMETER STEEL WISE
FORKED INTO A U S144PE WT LEGS TNAN t2' IN LENGTH.
INSTALL IFSP EG APPNXIIMTELTEVEAv L LINEAR FOOT ON
GOTH SIDES OF NAME ANO AT EACH END TG S ME IT TO TIME SOIL.
INSTALL M"INO IN A(,CSPM%VE WITN S6cT1nI 1681 DP THE
STANMPO S CIFICATINS.
�• FT
INSET A INSET B
EROSION CONTROL NOTES
GENERAL NOTES
1. DISTURBED AREA: 8.7 ACRES (INCLUDES ALL IMPROVEMENTS WITHIN PROPOSED TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION
EASEMENTS ANO EXISTING PERMANENT EASEMENTS/RIGHT-OF-WAY)
2. SOIL TYPES: CLAYEY SILTS
SILTY CLAYS WITH ROCK FRAGMENTS
SANDY CLAYEY SILTS
SANDY SILTS
3. ALL PRACTICES SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE GUIDELINES, CITY OF CHARLOTTE AND STANDARDS AND
PRACTICES OF THE STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA AS SET FORTH IN THE "EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PLANNING
AND DESIGN MANUAL.
4. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE PROPER INSTALLATION, MAINTENANCE AND REMOVAL OF ALL
EROSION CONTROL MEASURES AS DESIGNATED ON THESE PLANS.
5. THE EROSION CONTROL PLANS DEPICT EROSION CONTROL MEASURES FOR THE ENTIRE PROJECT. THESE DEVICES SHALL
BE PLACED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CONSTRUCTION SCHEDULE OUTLINED HEREIN AS ACTUAL CONSTRUCTION WITHIN
THE WORK AREA PROGRESSES. REFER TO TRAFFIC CONTROL PLANS FOR DETAILED SEQUENCE OF CONSTRUCTION.
6. THE EROSION CONTROL MEASURES SPECIFIED ON THESE PLANS ARE INTENDED TO REPRESENT THE MINIMUM
REQUIREMENTS FOR THIS PROJECT. ADDITIONAL TEMPORARY MEASURES AND/OR ADJUSTMENT OF THOSE SHOWN MAY BE
REQUIRED AS FIELD CONDITIONS DICTATE INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO: TEMPORARY PIPING, ADDITIONAL SEDIMENT
FENCE AND/OR INCIDENTAL STONE.
7. THE CONTRACTOR IS ADVISED TO EXERCISE DUE DILIGENCE AND CARE IN THE PLACEMENT OF EROSION CONTROL
MEASURES ADJACENT TO AND/OR AFFECTING PRIVATE PROPERTY, MEASURES SHALL BE PLACED TO PERMIT DRIVEWAY
ACCESS AND TO PROVIDE PEDESTRIAN SAFETY AT ALL TIMES.
8. DURING CONSTRUCTION, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL MAKE EVERY EFFORT TO DIRECT AND/OR DIVERT POTENTIAL
SEDIMENT -LADEN RUNOFF TO EROSION CONTROL DEVICES IN PLACE AS LAND DISTURBING ACTIVITY PROCEEDS.
9. EROSION CONTROL MEASURES SHALL BE INSPECTED WEEKLY AND AFTER RAINFALL EVENTS. SEDIMENT SHALL BE
PERIODICALLY REMOVED AND PROPERLY DISPOSED OF AS REQUIRED. DEVICES SHALL BE MAINTAINED AND/OR REPLACED
AS NECESSARY TO ENSURE THAT THEY PERFORM AS INTENDED.
10. EROSION CONTROL PUN SHEETS ARE INTENDED FOR THE IMPLEMENTATION OF EROSION CONTROL MEASURES ONLY.
REFER TO ROADWAY PLANS FOR ACTUAL DETAILS OF ROADWAY CONSTRUCTION.
11. ALL EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PRACTICES WILL BE CHECKED FOR STABILITY AND OPERATION EVERY WEEK AND
FOLLOWING EVERY RUNOFF -PRODUCING RAINFALL. ANY NEEDED REPAIRS WILL BE MADE IMMEDIATELY TO MAINTAIN ALL
PRACTICES AS DESIGNED.
12. PREFABRICATION SILT FENCE IS NOT ACCEPTABLE, USE CITY OF CHARLOTTE LAND DEVELOPMENT STANDARD 30.06A.
CONSTRUCTION SCHEDULE
1. ENGINEER TO OBTAIN PLAN APPROVAL AND OTHER APPLICABLE PERMITS AS REQUIRED.
2. HOLD PRE -CONSTRUCTION CONFERENCE AS DICTATED PRIOR TO BEGINNING CONSTRUCTION
3. LAND DISTURBING ACTIVITIES CONSIST OF CONSTRUCTION OF CURB AND GUTTER, SIDEWALK AND PAVEMENT. TRAFFIC IS
THEN SHIFTED ONTO THE NEW SECTION AND CONSTRUCTION IS COMPLETED ON THE OTHER SIDE. FINAL WORK WILL
CONSIST OF PLACEMENT OF FINAL PAVEMENT LIFT, CONCRETE MEDIANS, ETC.
THE EROSION CONTROL MEASURES TO BE IMPLEMENTED ARE AS FOLLOWS:
1. PUCE SEDIMENT CONTROL FENCE ALONG THE PROPOSED TOE OF FILL AT THE LOCATIONS INDICATED ON PUNS.
2. PLACE INLET PROTECTION MEASURES AS SOON AS EACH STRUCTURE IS CONSTRUCTED TO PREVENT SEDIMENT INGRESS.
3. TEMPORARILY DITCH OR DIVERT RUNOFF TO PROTECTED LOCATIONS UNTIL ALL MEASURES ARE IN PLACE.
4. SEED ALL DENUDED AREAS IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE SEEDING SCHEDULE. GROUND STABILIZATION MUST OCCUR WITHIN
7 DAYS ON PERIMETER AREAS AND SLOPES GREATER THAN 3:1, AND GROUND STABILIZATION MUST OCCUR WITHIN 14
DAYS ON OTHER AREAS.
5. ANY BASIN OUTLET STRUCTURES WITH DRAINAGE AREAS EQUAL TO OR GREATER THAN 1 ACRE MUST WITHDRAW WATER
FROM THE SURFACE.
6. ANY AREAS USED FOR STAGING OR STOCKPILING OUTSIDE THE PERMITTED LIMITS OF THE PROJECT WILL REQUIRE AN
EROSION CONTROL PLAN.
7. REMOVE TEMPORARY EROSION CONTROL DEVICES AFTER THE PROJECT HAS BEEN PERMANENTLY STABILIZED.
MAINTENANCE PLAN
1. CHECK ALL EROSION CONTROL MEASURES WEEKLY AND AFTER EACH RAINFALL.
2. REMOVE SEDIMENT FROM BEHIND SEDIMENT FENCE WHEN THE ACCUMULATED MATERIAL IS 0.50 FEET DEEP. RESET
AND/OR REPLACE FENCE AS REQUIRED THROUGHOUT CONSTRUCTION.
3. SEED NEWLY GRADED AREAS AS EARLY AS POSSIBLE. RESEED, AS NECESSARY, ANY REMAINING OR NEWLY DISTURBED
AREAS AS WORK PROGRESSES THROUGHOUT THE ENTIRE CONSTRUCTION PERIOD.
VEGETATIVE PLAN
1, ALL DISTURBED AREAS WILL BE STABILIZED BY PERMANENTLY VEGETATING WITH SEED AND MULCH AS RECOMMENDED
BY THE SEEDING SCHEDULE AND SPECIFICATIONS DUE TO THE RESTRAINTS ON THE LENGTH OF IMPROVEMENTS AND/OR
DURATION OF EXPOSED DISTURBED AREAS.
2 TO PROMOTE A DENSE VEGETATIVE COVER IN AREAS WHERE RUNOFF CONCENTRATES OR IN AREAS WHERE VEGETATION
IS HARD TO ESTABLISH A MATTING FOR EROSION CONTROL WILL BE USED. THE MATTING TO BE USED WILL BE A
MATTING THAT CONSISTS OF 70% STRAW AND COCONUT AND BE BACKEDOR APPROVED EQUAL. THE MATTING FOR
EROSION CONTROL WILL BE CONSTRUCTED AS PART OF THE PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS AND SHALL ALSO SERVE FOR
VEGETATIVE STABILIZATION PURPOSES.
BYPASS PUMPING
SEQUENCE OF CONSTRUCTION FOR TYPICAL WORK AREA:
1. INSTALL SPECIAL STILLING BASIN(S) OR STABILIZED OUTLET IF PUMPING CLEAN WATER.
2. INSTALL UPSTREAM PUMP AND TEMPORARY FLEXIBLE HOSE.
3. PUCE UPSTREAM IMPERVIOUS DIKE AND BEGIN PUMPING OPERATIONS FOR STREAM DIVERSION.
4. PUCE DOWNSTREAM IMPERVIOUS DIKE AND PUMPING APPARATUS. DEWATER ENTRAPPED AREA. AREA TO BE
DEWATERED SHALL BE EQUAL TO ONE DAY'S WORK.
5. PERFORM STREAM RESTORATION WORK IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PUNS.
6. EXCAVATE ANY ACCUMULATED SILT AND DEWATER BEFORE REMOVAL OF IMPERVIOUS DIKES. REMOVE IMPERVIOUS
DIKES, PUMPS, AND TEMPORARY FLEXIBLE HOSE. (DOWNSTREAM IMPERVIOUS DIKES FIRST.)
7. ALL GRADING AND STABILIZATION MUST BE COMPLETED IN ONE DAY WITHIN THE PUMP AROUND AREAS BETWEEN THE
IMPERVIOUS DIKES. THE IMPERVIOUS DIKE LOCATIONS AS SHOWN ON THIS SHEET ONLY SHOW THE UPPER AND LOWER
EXTENT OF WORK FOR EACH STREAM SEGMENT. THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR DETERMINING THE LOCATION
OF THE IMPERVIOUS DIKE(S) FOR EACH DAY'S WORK.
8. REMOVE SPECIAL STILLING BASIN(S) AND BACKFILL STABILIZE DISTURBED AREA WITH SEED AND MULCH.
NOTES:
1. ALL EXCAVATION SHALL BE PERFORMED IN ONLY DRY OR ISOLATED SECTIONS OF CHANNEL.
2 IMPERVIOUS DIKES ARE TO BE USED TO ISOLATE WORK FROM STREAM FLOW WHEN NECESSARY.
3. ALL GRADED AREAS SHALL BE STABILIZED WITHIN 24 HOURS.
4. MAINTENANCE OF STREAM FLOW OPERATIONS SHALL BE INCIDENTAL TO THE WORK. THIS INCLUDES POLYETHYLENE
SHEETING, DIVERSION PIPES, PUMPS AND HOSES.
5. PUMPS AND HOSES SHALL BE OF SUFFICIENT SIZE TO DEWATER THE WORK AREA
12" MIN OF NCDOT #5 W=5' MIN.
SECTION A -A
OR #57 WASHED STONE
TOP OF BANK
DIMENT TRAP C�- T= 1.5' MIN.
UTILIZE AN ENERGY
DISSIPATER IN PUMPING
DIKE
RITERIA T'
FF
CLEAN WATER
WITH OVER FLOW
3600 CU FT ACRE
CLASS B RIPRAP I TON
l
A
DISCHARGE HOSE
G 1 AC. P/' 5' MAX
INTAKE
H
(SEE NCDOT STD. 1630.06)
<- FLOW
2:1
12'MIN.
3' MIN HEIGHT FROM
IMPERVIOUS PUMP
4N 1.5' MIN.
C� FIOw
DIKE
3600
B
B W
MIN. (CU. PT.
PUMPS AND PIPES SECURELY.
A A
VOLUME PER AC. FILTER
FLOW
•
REQUIRED DISTURBED) FABRIC
STREAM BOTTOM NTS
435
SURFACE (SQ, FT.
REQUIRED P p10JFs DESIGN SETTLED TO OVERFILL 6' FOR
21' MIN. SETTLEMENT
SNOB
NOTES: MAX FILLL L=10' MIN. ryZN,OQ EMERGENCY
_ BY-PASS 6'
\ BELOW
1. REFER TO NCESCPDM T F, \� SETTLED TDP
SECTION #6.60 FOR\ c�j°�
ADDITIONAL DESIGN 2' TO 3.5' \�% OF DAM
SPECIFICATIONS \ \ \ / ^,� Q /
1_
_
REGARDING TEMPORARY NATURAL GROUND
SEDIMENT TRAPS.
FILTER FABRIC -/X=7' MI .
2. REFER TO CLOS
STANDARD {30.19 FOR
BAFFLE SPACING NOT TO SCALE
•
CITY OF CHARLOTTE
1126
LAND DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
TEMPORARY SEDIMENT TRAP STD. No. REV.
©IAHE.017E.
INCLUDES CHARLOTTE ETd
30.01 1 5
EROSION CONTROL NOTES
GENERAL NOTES
1. DISTURBED AREA: 8.7 ACRES (INCLUDES ALL IMPROVEMENTS WITHIN PROPOSED TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION
EASEMENTS ANO EXISTING PERMANENT EASEMENTS/RIGHT-OF-WAY)
2. SOIL TYPES: CLAYEY SILTS
SILTY CLAYS WITH ROCK FRAGMENTS
SANDY CLAYEY SILTS
SANDY SILTS
3. ALL PRACTICES SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE GUIDELINES, CITY OF CHARLOTTE AND STANDARDS AND
PRACTICES OF THE STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA AS SET FORTH IN THE "EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PLANNING
AND DESIGN MANUAL.
4. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE PROPER INSTALLATION, MAINTENANCE AND REMOVAL OF ALL
EROSION CONTROL MEASURES AS DESIGNATED ON THESE PLANS.
5. THE EROSION CONTROL PLANS DEPICT EROSION CONTROL MEASURES FOR THE ENTIRE PROJECT. THESE DEVICES SHALL
BE PLACED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CONSTRUCTION SCHEDULE OUTLINED HEREIN AS ACTUAL CONSTRUCTION WITHIN
THE WORK AREA PROGRESSES. REFER TO TRAFFIC CONTROL PLANS FOR DETAILED SEQUENCE OF CONSTRUCTION.
6. THE EROSION CONTROL MEASURES SPECIFIED ON THESE PLANS ARE INTENDED TO REPRESENT THE MINIMUM
REQUIREMENTS FOR THIS PROJECT. ADDITIONAL TEMPORARY MEASURES AND/OR ADJUSTMENT OF THOSE SHOWN MAY BE
REQUIRED AS FIELD CONDITIONS DICTATE INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO: TEMPORARY PIPING, ADDITIONAL SEDIMENT
FENCE AND/OR INCIDENTAL STONE.
7. THE CONTRACTOR IS ADVISED TO EXERCISE DUE DILIGENCE AND CARE IN THE PLACEMENT OF EROSION CONTROL
MEASURES ADJACENT TO AND/OR AFFECTING PRIVATE PROPERTY, MEASURES SHALL BE PLACED TO PERMIT DRIVEWAY
ACCESS AND TO PROVIDE PEDESTRIAN SAFETY AT ALL TIMES.
8. DURING CONSTRUCTION, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL MAKE EVERY EFFORT TO DIRECT AND/OR DIVERT POTENTIAL
SEDIMENT -LADEN RUNOFF TO EROSION CONTROL DEVICES IN PLACE AS LAND DISTURBING ACTIVITY PROCEEDS.
9. EROSION CONTROL MEASURES SHALL BE INSPECTED WEEKLY AND AFTER RAINFALL EVENTS. SEDIMENT SHALL BE
PERIODICALLY REMOVED AND PROPERLY DISPOSED OF AS REQUIRED. DEVICES SHALL BE MAINTAINED AND/OR REPLACED
AS NECESSARY TO ENSURE THAT THEY PERFORM AS INTENDED.
10. EROSION CONTROL PUN SHEETS ARE INTENDED FOR THE IMPLEMENTATION OF EROSION CONTROL MEASURES ONLY.
REFER TO ROADWAY PLANS FOR ACTUAL DETAILS OF ROADWAY CONSTRUCTION.
11. ALL EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PRACTICES WILL BE CHECKED FOR STABILITY AND OPERATION EVERY WEEK AND
FOLLOWING EVERY RUNOFF -PRODUCING RAINFALL. ANY NEEDED REPAIRS WILL BE MADE IMMEDIATELY TO MAINTAIN ALL
PRACTICES AS DESIGNED.
12. PREFABRICATION SILT FENCE IS NOT ACCEPTABLE, USE CITY OF CHARLOTTE LAND DEVELOPMENT STANDARD 30.06A.
CONSTRUCTION SCHEDULE
1. ENGINEER TO OBTAIN PLAN APPROVAL AND OTHER APPLICABLE PERMITS AS REQUIRED.
2. HOLD PRE -CONSTRUCTION CONFERENCE AS DICTATED PRIOR TO BEGINNING CONSTRUCTION
3. LAND DISTURBING ACTIVITIES CONSIST OF CONSTRUCTION OF CURB AND GUTTER, SIDEWALK AND PAVEMENT. TRAFFIC IS
THEN SHIFTED ONTO THE NEW SECTION AND CONSTRUCTION IS COMPLETED ON THE OTHER SIDE. FINAL WORK WILL
CONSIST OF PLACEMENT OF FINAL PAVEMENT LIFT, CONCRETE MEDIANS, ETC.
THE EROSION CONTROL MEASURES TO BE IMPLEMENTED ARE AS FOLLOWS:
1. PUCE SEDIMENT CONTROL FENCE ALONG THE PROPOSED TOE OF FILL AT THE LOCATIONS INDICATED ON PUNS.
2. PLACE INLET PROTECTION MEASURES AS SOON AS EACH STRUCTURE IS CONSTRUCTED TO PREVENT SEDIMENT INGRESS.
3. TEMPORARILY DITCH OR DIVERT RUNOFF TO PROTECTED LOCATIONS UNTIL ALL MEASURES ARE IN PLACE.
4. SEED ALL DENUDED AREAS IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE SEEDING SCHEDULE. GROUND STABILIZATION MUST OCCUR WITHIN
7 DAYS ON PERIMETER AREAS AND SLOPES GREATER THAN 3:1, AND GROUND STABILIZATION MUST OCCUR WITHIN 14
DAYS ON OTHER AREAS.
5. ANY BASIN OUTLET STRUCTURES WITH DRAINAGE AREAS EQUAL TO OR GREATER THAN 1 ACRE MUST WITHDRAW WATER
FROM THE SURFACE.
6. ANY AREAS USED FOR STAGING OR STOCKPILING OUTSIDE THE PERMITTED LIMITS OF THE PROJECT WILL REQUIRE AN
EROSION CONTROL PLAN.
7. REMOVE TEMPORARY EROSION CONTROL DEVICES AFTER THE PROJECT HAS BEEN PERMANENTLY STABILIZED.
MAINTENANCE PLAN
1. CHECK ALL EROSION CONTROL MEASURES WEEKLY AND AFTER EACH RAINFALL.
2. REMOVE SEDIMENT FROM BEHIND SEDIMENT FENCE WHEN THE ACCUMULATED MATERIAL IS 0.50 FEET DEEP. RESET
AND/OR REPLACE FENCE AS REQUIRED THROUGHOUT CONSTRUCTION.
3. SEED NEWLY GRADED AREAS AS EARLY AS POSSIBLE. RESEED, AS NECESSARY, ANY REMAINING OR NEWLY DISTURBED
AREAS AS WORK PROGRESSES THROUGHOUT THE ENTIRE CONSTRUCTION PERIOD.
VEGETATIVE PLAN
1, ALL DISTURBED AREAS WILL BE STABILIZED BY PERMANENTLY VEGETATING WITH SEED AND MULCH AS RECOMMENDED
BY THE SEEDING SCHEDULE AND SPECIFICATIONS DUE TO THE RESTRAINTS ON THE LENGTH OF IMPROVEMENTS AND/OR
DURATION OF EXPOSED DISTURBED AREAS.
2 TO PROMOTE A DENSE VEGETATIVE COVER IN AREAS WHERE RUNOFF CONCENTRATES OR IN AREAS WHERE VEGETATION
IS HARD TO ESTABLISH A MATTING FOR EROSION CONTROL WILL BE USED. THE MATTING TO BE USED WILL BE A
MATTING THAT CONSISTS OF 70% STRAW AND COCONUT AND BE BACKEDOR APPROVED EQUAL. THE MATTING FOR
EROSION CONTROL WILL BE CONSTRUCTED AS PART OF THE PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS AND SHALL ALSO SERVE FOR
VEGETATIVE STABILIZATION PURPOSES.
BYPASS PUMPING
SEQUENCE OF CONSTRUCTION FOR TYPICAL WORK AREA:
1. INSTALL SPECIAL STILLING BASIN(S) OR STABILIZED OUTLET IF PUMPING CLEAN WATER.
2. INSTALL UPSTREAM PUMP AND TEMPORARY FLEXIBLE HOSE.
3. PUCE UPSTREAM IMPERVIOUS DIKE AND BEGIN PUMPING OPERATIONS FOR STREAM DIVERSION.
4. PUCE DOWNSTREAM IMPERVIOUS DIKE AND PUMPING APPARATUS. DEWATER ENTRAPPED AREA. AREA TO BE
DEWATERED SHALL BE EQUAL TO ONE DAY'S WORK.
5. PERFORM STREAM RESTORATION WORK IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PUNS.
6. EXCAVATE ANY ACCUMULATED SILT AND DEWATER BEFORE REMOVAL OF IMPERVIOUS DIKES. REMOVE IMPERVIOUS
DIKES, PUMPS, AND TEMPORARY FLEXIBLE HOSE. (DOWNSTREAM IMPERVIOUS DIKES FIRST.)
7. ALL GRADING AND STABILIZATION MUST BE COMPLETED IN ONE DAY WITHIN THE PUMP AROUND AREAS BETWEEN THE
IMPERVIOUS DIKES. THE IMPERVIOUS DIKE LOCATIONS AS SHOWN ON THIS SHEET ONLY SHOW THE UPPER AND LOWER
EXTENT OF WORK FOR EACH STREAM SEGMENT. THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR DETERMINING THE LOCATION
OF THE IMPERVIOUS DIKE(S) FOR EACH DAY'S WORK.
8. REMOVE SPECIAL STILLING BASIN(S) AND BACKFILL STABILIZE DISTURBED AREA WITH SEED AND MULCH.
NOTES:
1. ALL EXCAVATION SHALL BE PERFORMED IN ONLY DRY OR ISOLATED SECTIONS OF CHANNEL.
2 IMPERVIOUS DIKES ARE TO BE USED TO ISOLATE WORK FROM STREAM FLOW WHEN NECESSARY.
3. ALL GRADED AREAS SHALL BE STABILIZED WITHIN 24 HOURS.
4. MAINTENANCE OF STREAM FLOW OPERATIONS SHALL BE INCIDENTAL TO THE WORK. THIS INCLUDES POLYETHYLENE
SHEETING, DIVERSION PIPES, PUMPS AND HOSES.
5. PUMPS AND HOSES SHALL BE OF SUFFICIENT SIZE TO DEWATER THE WORK AREA
BYPASS PUMPING FOR CULVERT INSTALLATION
SECTI❑N B -B
IMPERVIOUS DIKE
,111
S CA Rol!%,
NN �Q�OFESS
SEAL
I 036188
C,
Nim
6' MIN HEIGHT FROM
SECTION A -A
STREAM BOTTOM 11
TOP OF BANK
TEMP. POLYETHYLENE FABRIC ON
1
UTILIZE AN ENERGY
DISSIPATER IN PUMPING
DIKE
(8 ML. THICK)
42' CMP
CLEAN WATER
WITH OVER FLOW
PIPE
CLASS B RIPRAP I TON
(FACE
- STREAM
A
DISCHARGE HOSE
18,� FLOW
INTAKE
MIN. SANDBAGS
(SEE NCDOT STD. 1630.06)
<- FLOW
NTS
STREAM BOTTOM
12'MIN.
3' MIN HEIGHT FROM
IMPERVIOUS PUMP
C� FIOw
DIKE
INSTALL SANDBAGS IN PIPE INVERT & FABRIC WHILE PUMPING
AROUND DURING CONSTRUCTION IN STREAM.
B
B W
STREAM
PUMPS AND PIPES SECURELY.
A A
REMOVE SANDBAGS & FABRIC TO ALLOW FLOW THROUGH
FLOW
•
PIPE WHEN NOT PUMPING AROUND.
BYPASS PUMPING FOR CULVERT INSTALLATION
SECTI❑N B -B
IMPERVIOUS DIKE
,111
S CA Rol!%,
NN �Q�OFESS
SEAL
I 036188
C,
Nim
SECTION A -A
PROJECT
TOP OF BANK
IMPERVIOUS
DIKE
WITH OVER FLOW
PIPE
SEE SECTION
A
SPECIAL STILLING BASIN
INTAKE
(SEE NCDOT STD. 1630.06)
12'MIN.
3' MIN HEIGHT FROM
NOTE:
STREAM BOTTOM CLASS B RIPRAP
ENSURE TO ANCHOR ALL
STREAM
PUMPS AND PIPES SECURELY.
WORK AREA
FLOW
STREAM BOTTOM NTS
BYPASS PUMPING FOR CULVERT INSTALLATION
SECTI❑N B -B
IMPERVIOUS DIKE
,111
S CA Rol!%,
NN �Q�OFESS
SEAL
I 036188
C,
Nim

MATTING ANCHOR TRENCH
N TRENCH ON 1' CENTERS
ANCHOR OVERLAP
ON V CENTERS
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
ANCHORS ON
3' CENTERS
DIRECTION
OF FLOW
MEW,, ANCHORS
-� I - 6" OVERLAY(MIN)
PLAN VIEW
COIR FIBE
MATTING
ANCHORS ON
3' CENTERS
EXTEND MATTING
TO END M
NOTES:
IN AREAS TO BE MATTED, ALL SEEDING, SOIL
CINCH STAKETM
(wooden 2"xi" nominal)
1.5" .75"
75"
12"
6"
18"(TYR) FLOODPLAIN/
EXISTING
kcal I, GROUND
AMENDMENTS, AND SOIL PREPARATION MUST BEIN TRENCH
COMPLETED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PROJECT v
/-MATTING SHALL BE
SPECIFICATIONS PRIOR TO PLACEMENT OF COIR
FIBER MATTING. PLACED IN TRENCH
AND BACKFILLED
STREAM BED77 TYPICAL CROSS SECTION
COIR FIBER MATTING DETAIL
NOT TO SCALE
6"
VARIABLE WIDTH
TIE TO EXISTING GRADE
TIE TO EXISTING GRADE
VARIES VARIES
8' - 9' 8' - 9'
1 ,
10.1
ENTIRE CHANNEL TO BELINED ~ titi i1 T
1 1�1ti
WITH COIR FIBER MATTING
CHANNEL TYPICAL SECTION
STA 11+57 TO 12+97
NOT TO SCALE
11" MILLING AND
RESURFACING (MIN.)
8" ASPHALT PATCH
(MIN.) OR AS SHOWN
IN PAVEMENT
5' MIN SCHEDULE 5' MIN
EXISTING PAVEMENT N, EXISTING PAVEMENT
\\N
100% DENSITY
2'-0" VARIES 2'-0" V-0
TRENCH TO BE BACKFILLED WITH
APPROVED SUITABLE MATERIAL
AS DIRECTED BY THE ENGINEER
95% DENSITY
VARIES
PIPE (DIAMETER VARIES)
PAVEMENT REPAIR WITH MILLING
NO DEGRADATION EEE
SEE SHEET A-1 FOR EXTENTS NOT TO SCALE
OF MILLING & RESURFACING
AND FULL DEPTH PAVEMENT.
NOTES:
1. CONTRACTION JOINTS SHALL BE SPACED AT 10 -FOOT INTERVALS. JOINT SPACING MAY BE ALTERED BY THE ENGINEER
TO PREVENT UNCONTROLLED CRACKING.
2. CONTRACTION JOINTS MAY BE INSTALLED BY THE USE OF TEMPLATES OR FORMED BY OTHER APPROVED METHODS.
WHERE SUCH JOINTS ARE NOT FORMED BY TEMPLATES, A MINIMUM DEPTH OF 1 1/2" SHALL BE OBTAINED.
3. ALL EXPANSION JOINTS SHALL BE SPACED AT 90 -FOOT INTERVALS, AND ADJACENT TO ALL RIGID OBJECTS.
4. CONCRETE COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH SHALL BE 3600 P.S.I. IN 28 DAYS.
5. TOP 6" OF SUBGRADE BENEATH THE CURB SHALL BE COMPACTED TO 1007 STANDARD PROCTOR DENSITY.
6. DETAIL MAY BE USED FOR PRIVATE DRIVES, PARKING LOTS, AND INTERIOR CIRCULATION DRIVE.
6" GONG. CURB
DRIVEWAY WIDTH �6'�I ji/e" RADIUS
RHES 3" RADIUS wi-I
=111
111=1I 1=111=111 1T-111=111=111=11"
6" GONG. DRIVEWAY -111=111=111= 1 °
"-1TI-1I I � 1111 I I II I II I1-11 �I"
1 -111- =111-
6" CONC. CURB @ DRIVEWAY
NOT TO SCALE
a
o
o N
SEAL
26957
a
a
ENSITIVE MATERIALDo Not Duplicate� � �
m
u _
0 0
F
�e
=
W
roe
vl
N
Lr 0.1 In
W
arc
Z
A
o��
w
a
a
ENSITIVE MATERIALDo Not Duplicate� � �

ZONE 1: STREAMBANK VEGETATION (1,410 SF�
COMMON NAME
BOTANICAL NAME
SPACING
QUANTITY
SIZE
SILKY WILLOW
SALIX SERICA
3' OC
54
LIVE STAKE
SILKY DOGWOOD
CORNUS AMOMUM
3' OC
54
LIVE STAKE
ELDERBERRY
SAMBUCUS CANADENSIS
3' OC
54
LIVE STAKE
ZONE 2: BENCH VEGETATION (,1,330 SFj
COMMON NAME I BOTANICAL NAME SPACING QUANTITY I SIZE
VIRGINIA SWEETSPIRE I ILEA VIRGINICA 6' OC 60 LIVE STAKE
TEMPORARY SEEDING FOR WARM AND COOL SEASONS (ALL ZONES
ZONE 1 & ZONE 2: PERMANENT SEEDING
COMMON NAME
EARLY SUMMER SEASON
LATE FALL SEASON
SEEDING
MAY 1st - AUGUST 15th
20
DATES
REFERTILIZE IF GROWTH IS
OCTOBER 25th - DECEMBER 30th
LIVE ���
NOT FULLY ADEQUATE
10
SEEDING
40 LBS/ACRE OF GERMAN MILLET
40 LBS/ACRE RYE (GRAIN)
MIXTURE
OR BROWN TOP MILLET
g0 LBS/ACRE TALL FESCUE
2-3Feet
80 LBS/ACRE OF TALL FESCUE
ANGLE CUT 30'-45'
APPLY LIMESTONE AND FERTILIZER PER SOIL TESTS,
SEEDING
OR 2000 LBS/ACRE LIMESTONE AND 750 LBS/ACRE
AMENDMENTS
10-10-10 FERTILIZER
ZONE 1 & ZONE 2: PERMANENT SEEDING
COMMON NAME
LIVE STAKES
LIVE STAKE
PLANTING DETAIL
PANICUM RIGIDULUM
20
CAMPER LITTLE BLUE STEM
COIR FIBER MA
SQUARE CUT �
LIVE ���
BUDS (FACING UPWARD)
10
BLACK-EYED SUSAN
RUDBECKIA HIRTA
10
EXISTING/PROPOSED
LIVE CUTTING
(1/2--2' DIAMETER)
/ GROUND
2-3Feet
41EXISTING/PROP.SED
ANGLE CUT 30'-45'
1 DICHANTHELIUM CLANDESTINUM
STREAMBED
VIRGINIA WILD RYE
BANK STABILIZATION WITH LIVE STAKES
5
NOTE
I TRIDENS FLAVUS
LIVE STAKES SHALL BE SPACED APPROXIMATELY 3 FEET &
TICKSEED SUNFLOWER
6 FEET ON CENTER
5
LIVE STAKES SHALL BE DRNEN UNTIL APPROXIMATELY 3/4
OF LIVE STAKE IS WITHIN GROUND
ZONE 1 & ZONE 2: PERMANENT SEEDING
COMMON NAME
BOTANICAL NAME
% MIX
RED -TOP PANICGRASS
PANICUM RIGIDULUM
20
CAMPER LITTLE BLUE STEM
SCHIZACHYRIUM SCOPARIUM
20
LANCE -LEAVED COREOPSIS
COREOPSIS LANCEOLATA
10
BLACK-EYED SUSAN
RUDBECKIA HIRTA
10
BEAKED PANICGRASS
PANICUM ANCEPS
10
RIVER OATS
CHASMANTHIUM LATIFOLIUM
10
DEER TONGUE
1 DICHANTHELIUM CLANDESTINUM
5
VIRGINIA WILD RYE
ELYMUS VIRGINICUS
5
PURPLE TOP
I TRIDENS FLAVUS
5
TICKSEED SUNFLOWER
I BIDENS ARISTOSA
5
NOTE: APPLICATION RATE 40 BULK LBS/ACRE
GENERAL NOTES
1. IN ALL DISTURBED AREAS IN ZONE 1 SHOULD BE RAKED/ROUGHENED (A
MINIMUM OF 5"), AMENDED WITH FERTILIZER, SEEDED (PERMANENT AND
TEMPORARY), STRAWED, AND THEN COVERED WITH EROSION CONTROL
MATTING (IF APPLICABLE) PER THE MANUFACTURERS RECOMMENDATIONS
ONCE THE MATTING IS DOWN, INSTALL THE LIVE STAKES AND OTHER
PLANT MATERIAL.
2. THE INSTALLED VEGETATION MUST RECEIVE AT LEAST 1 INCH OF WATER A
WEEK EITHER THROUGH NATURAL OR SUPPLEMENTAL SOURCES.
3. SURVIVAL RATES OF 85% SHALL BE MET FOR ALL PLANTED MATERIALS.
PLANT MATERIAL SURVIVAL IS BASED ON INSPECTION AFTER THE FIRST
GROWING SEASON (LATE SUMMER/EARLY FALL). NEW GROWTH WILL BE
INDICATOR FOR A LIVING PLANT.
4. BALL AND BURLAP/LARGE CONTAINER PLANTS SHALL FOLLOW PLANTING
DETAIL CLDSM 40.01. PLANTING SHOULD TAKE PLACE NOV. 15 - APRIL 15.
STREAMBANK REFORESTATION TYPICAL
ZONE 1 - STREAMBANK VEGETATION
ZONE 2 - BENCH VEGETATION
ZONE1 ZONE2 ZONE1
FT. FT.
STREAM
N.T.S.
a
ENSITIVE MATERIALDo Not Duplicate
SEAL
26957