20111126 Ver 2_401 Application_20121212

LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL
S &ME, Inc.
9751 Southern Pine Blvd.
Charlotte, NC 28273
704.523.4726
704.525 -3953 fax
To: NC Division of Water Quality
401 Wetlands Unit
512 North Salisbury Street
Raleigh, NC 276004
We Are Sending You: ® Attached
following items:
I 1 —1112- lP U a-
t
Date: December 18, 2012
Job No. 1357 -11 -005
PNG Huntersville
Re:
Strengthening
Attn: Ms. Karen Higgins
❑ Under separate cover via
❑ Shop drawings ❑ Contract ❑ Plans ❑ Samples ❑ Specifications
❑ Copy of letter ❑ Report
the
Copies
Date
No
Description
4
12/17/12
1
Re- authorization of NWP No. 12/WQC No. 3884
1
12/17/12
2
CD
1
12/17/12
3
Check for $570.00
These Are Transmitted As Checked Below:
® For approval ❑ For your use
❑ As requested ❑ For Review
❑ For Bids Due: / ❑ Prints Returned After Loan To Us
Remarks: Enclosed is a copy of the above - mentioned report, CD and check.
Signed:
If you have any questions, feel free to call Joey Lawler at 704 - 523 -4726
Gloria A. Keiffer, Administrative Assistant

*S&ME
December 17, 2012
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Asheville Regulatory Field Office
US Army Corps of Engineers
151 Patton Avenue, Room 208
Asheville, North Carolina 28801 -5006
Attention: Mr. Steve Kichefski
N.C. Division of Water Quality
401 Wetlands Unit
512 North Salisbury Street
Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
Attention: Ms. Karen Higgins
Reference: Re- authorization of NWP No. 12/WQC No. 3884
PNG Huntersville Strengthening
Huntersville, North Carolina
USACE Action ID No. 2012 -00182
NCDWQ project No. 11 -1126
S &ME Project No. 1357 -11 -005
Dear Mr. Kichefski and Ms. Higgins:
On behalf of Piedmont Natural Gas (PNG), S &ME, Inc. (S &ME) hereby submits this
application for re- authorization of a previously- approved Nationwide Permit (NWT) and
the corresponding North Carolina Water Quality Certification (WQC), which have
expired prior to the project's construction. PNG, the project sponsor, will continue to be
considered the applicant. S &ME is acting on behalf of PNG in accordance with their
acceptance of our Work Authorization Form dated April 6, 2011, and our Master
Services Agreement (S &ME Proposal No. 1357- 18259 -07), dated October 1, 2008.
The project has not changed since its original authorization, and involves construction of
approximately 10,000 linear feet (1.89 miles) of six -inch diameter natural gas pipeline in
Mecklenburg County, North Carolina, and will involve no loss of waters of the U.S. In
support of this application, please find enclosed the following:
• Figures: Site Vicinity Map (Figure 1), USGS Topographic Map (Figure 2) and 2009
Aerial Photograph (Figure 3);
• Appendix I: Completed Pre - Construction Notification (PCN), Authorization to Act as
Agent and copies of original permit approval letters;
• Appendix II: Wetland and Stream Impact Tables;
• Appendix III: Site Photographs;
S &ME, INC. / 9751 Southern Pine Blvd / Charlotte, NC 28273 / p 704.523.4726 f 704.525.3953 / www.smeinc.com

Re- authorization of NWP No. 12M/QC No. 3884 SWE Project No. 1357 -11 -005
PNG Huntersville Strengthening December 17, 2012
Appendix IV: Jurisdictional Waters of the U.S. Impact Plan Drawings (Sheets 1 -12);
Appendix V: Agency Correspondence; and
Appendix VI: Restoration Plan.
This Pre - construction Notification (PCN) is being provided to the U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers (USACE) for re- authorization, and complies with all applicable conditions of
NWP No. 12. Written concurrence from the North Carolina Division of Water Quality
(NCDWQ) is also required in part because the proposed project does not meet all
conditions of the WQC, specifically:
The proposed gas line will not cross all streams within the project corridor at a near -
perpendicular angle because much of the project will parallel an existing utility
corridor. Because the existing utility corridor does not cross all streams within the
tolerance identified in the aforementioned WQC, the proposed project will also not
meet this requirement.
The proposed project will require permanently- maintained rights -of -way (ROW) that
exceed 15 feet in width through jurisdictional areas at some locations. The general
WQC includes an exemption for natural gas pipelines, provided that mitigation is
offered for conversion of forested wetlands to herbaceous wetlands due to the
additional maintained width. To meet their operational requirements, PNG is
requesting an additional 15 feet for a total maintained width of 30 feet at stream and
wetland crossings. This is the minimum width required to support: 1) leakage
surveys from ground mobile units or aerial technology; 2) aerial patrolling for
possible encroachment activity near the pipeline; 3) accurate identification of possible
repairs and maintenance; 4) promotion of damage prevention in that the ROW can be
more easily identified by the public; 5) minimization of potential canopy
encroachment, which creates visibility concerns, and; 6) minimum turn - around
requirements for mechanized mowing and side - trimming equipment.
GENERAL PROJECT INFORMATION AND HISTORY
PNG plans to install approximately 1.89 miles of natural gas line in Mecklenburg
County, N.C. The proposed pipeline originates southeast of Baylis Drive along an
existing pipeline line corridor. The pipeline then extends east, roughly paralleling Gilead
Road to the north and McDowell Creek to the south. The pipeline adjoins an existing
sewer easement, and will cross the confluence of McDowell Creek and Torrence Creek
via horizontal directional drill (HDD). The pipeline continues to parallel Torrence Creek
and the existing sewer easement, crossing Bradford Lane and then a portion of Old
Gilead Road (an abandoned roadway), within which the pipeline will be installed. The
pipeline will tie into an existing distribution line at the intersection of Gilead Road and
McCoy Road west of Huntersville, North Carolina.
The primary purpose of the project is to alleviate drops in pressure experienced by the
existing distribution gas line systems during peak demands, and to provide adequate
capacity pursuant to the required service level in Huntersville and its immediate vicinity.
2

Re- authorization of NWP No. 12M/QC No. 3884 SWE Project No. 1357 -11 -005
PNG Huntersville Strengthening December 17, 2012
The ROW is primarily located adjacent to existing pipeline and sewerline corridors and
passes through fields, wooded, residential, and commercial areas. The location of the
subject corridor is depicted on the Site Vicinity Map (Figure 1), portions of the 1996
Lake Norman South and Cornelius, N.C. USGS Topographic Quad Sheets (Figures 2),
and an Aerial Photograph dated 2009 (Figure 3).
The project as currently proposed was approved by the USACE on January 30, 2012
(Action ID No. 2012 - 00182) and by NCDWQ on January 23, 2012 (Project No. 11-
1126). Copies of the approval letters have been included in Appendix I. Subsequent to
permit authorization, PNG encountered delays in property acquisition, coordination with
the City's plans to construct a bicycle path on the adjoining greenway, and approval from
the Charlotte - Mecklenburg Historic Landmarks Commission regarding a Certificate of
Appropriateness for construction of the project near the Torrence Mill historic site. Since
that time, the land has been acquired, arrangements have been made to accommodate the
City, and the Certificate of Appropriateness has been acquired. PNG is now ready to
move forward with the project as it was originally proposed, but needs to acquire new
permits, as both the existing NWP and WQC have expired.
To minimize impacts, PNG elected to co- locate the proposed line adjacent to an existing
utility corridor where possible. To further minimize disturbance to jurisdictional Waters
of the U.S., PNG plans to limit the width of the proposed ROW at stream and wetland
crossings. The work will be conducted within a 40 -foot ROW, 10 feet of which will
consist of temporary work space (TWS), with the remaining 30 feet consisting of a
permanently- maintained easement. Four of the proposed wetland or stream crossings
will be conducted via "trenchless" methods (HDD or bore), and a fifth will be avoided
entirely. The remaining wetland crossings will be conducted via conventional methods.
While the project will result in no loss of waters of the U.S., 0.59 acre of forested wetland
will be converted to herbaceous wetlands.
DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPOSED WORK
Construction will first involve identification of the clearing limits, followed by removal
of aboveground woody vegetation from the proposed ROW and TWS either by
mechanical means or hand - clearing, as appropriate. Efforts will be made to remove trees
in a manner that minimizes disturbance of the forest floor, and prevents exposure of soil.
No grubbing or belowground vegetation removal will occur within wetlands, or along
streambanks outside of the temporary crossing footprints. Select portions of the ROW
and TWS may require rough grading to facilitate safe passage of equipment, and to
prepare a suitably -level work surface. Appropriate sediment and erosion control
measures will be installed following initial soil disturbance as the project progresses.
Where wetlands or streams will be crossed, the width of the ROW subject to vegetation
removal will be dictated by the method employed to construct the pipeline:
• Method 1: HDD or bored crossings (collectively referred to as "trenchless crossings ")
will involve aboveground removal of vegetation within the proposed corridor that
will not exceed 40 feet in width. A temporary equipment crossing will be installed

Re- authorization of NWP No. 12M/QC No. 3884 SWE Project No. 1357 -11 -005
PNG Huntersville Strengthening December 17, 2012
along one side of the ROW to facilitate equipment passage and prevent excessive
rutting and ground disturbance in wetlands and streams. Streams will be bridged by
use of bolted timber mats, modified railcars or similar measures that limit temporary
bank impacts. No other impacts will be associated with this type of crossing.
Method 2: At wetland and stream crossings that will be constructed using traditional
trenching methods, vegetation will be removed within the 40 -foot combined ROW
and TWS corridor. Timber mats /bridges will be employed for equipment to work and
travel on. Appropriate sediment and erosion control measures will be installed at all
crossings to prevent sedimentation of jurisdictional features as a result of
construction. Streambank vegetation within the corridor will be hand cleared, and
introduction of logging debris into streams or wetlands will be avoided to the extent
practicable.
In general, the pipe will be trucked to the site from a temporary storage yard, strung along
the ROW and placed on skids (wooden pedestals). Specialized machines will be used to
bend individual segments of pipe to fit the contours of the trench where necessary. The
pipe segments will be welded together, x -rayed and inspected for structural integrity, and
then lowered into the trench. Segments of the trench may require dewatering or
"padding" to prevent large rocks or other debris from coming in contact with the pipe.
Permanent trench breakers will then be installed where necessary and the trench
backfilled. In areas where segregation of the subsoil and topsoil is required (wetlands),
the topsoil will be replaced last. Affected areas will then be "cleaned up" by rough -
grading and temporary seeding (if necessary), followed by final grading, permanent
seeding and mulching to restore the ROW as closely as possible to pre- disturbance
contours and conditions.
Areas within wetlands that are disturbed will be seeded with a customized wetland seed
mix. Areas outside of the permanently maintained ROW will be allowed to revegetate
naturally. Streambanks temporarily affected by removal of bank vegetation and
placement of the equipment bridge will be stabilized with a separate native seed mix
specifically designed for riparian areas, placement of coir matting, and installation of
native woody plantings (livestakes or tubelings). No riprap will be employed on the
streambanks following construction.
EXISTING ENVIRONMENT
General land use in the vicinity of the project corridor consists of a mix of residential
areas, open field, forest, disturbed areas and maintained utility corridors. The proposed
pipeline is located in the Piedmont physiographic province. The Piedmont of North
Carolina is an area underlain by soils weathered in place from the parent crystalline
metamorphic and igneous bedrock material. Specific soil types along the proposed
pipeline corridor include well- drained Cecil sandy clay loam located on ridges and
somewhat poorly drained Monacan loam located on floodplains. Within the project area
elevations range from approximately 660 ft AMSL along Torrence Creek at the western
end of the pipeline to 730 ft AMSL along the ridgetops near the eastern end of the
4

Re- authorization of NWP No. 12M/QC No. 3884 SWE Project No. 1357 -11 -005
PNG Huntersville Strengthening December 17, 2012
pipeline. The proposed corridor is located in the Yadkin -Pee Dee River Basin, and runs
parallel McDowell Creek, Torrence Creek, and an unnamed tributary of Torrance Creek.
With respect to vegetation, commonly observed species occurring within the maintained
utility corridors included winged sumac (Rhus copallina), poison ivy (Toxicodendron
radicans), blackberry (Rubus spp.), trumpet creeper (Campsis radicans), partridge pea
(Chamaecrista fasciculata), creeping buttercup (Ranunculus repens), wild geranium
(Geranium maculatum), blue -eyed grass (Sisyrinchium spp.), wild onion (Allium sp.),
sericea lespedeza (Lespedeza cuneata), dandelion (Taraxacum officinale), dogfennel
(Eupatorium capillifolium), broomsedge (Andropogon virginicus), goldenrod (Solidago
spp.), bedstraw (Galium spp.), Virginia strawberry (Fragaria virginiana), common sheep
sorrel (Rumex acetosella), Japanese honeysuckle (Lonicera japonica), porcelain berry
(Ampelopsis brevipedunculata), Japanese stiltgrass (Microstegium viminium), hop sedge
(Carex lupulina), soft rush (Juncus effesus), Bermuda grass (Cynodon dactylon) and
other various grasses (Festuca spp.).
Dominant vegetation observed within wooded portions of the project corridor and areas
that adjoined existing utility lines included boxelder (Acer negundo), red maple (A.
rubra), sweetgum (Liquidamber styracifZua), sycamore (Platanus occidentalis), slippery
elm (Ulmus rubrum), Chinese privet (Ligustrum sinense), giant cane (Arundinacea
gigantia), wingstem (Verbesina alternifolia), sawtooth blackberry, ebony spleenwort
(Asplenium platyneuron), and Nepalese brown -top (Eulalia vimineum).
Photos of the project corridor are included in Appendix III.
JURISDICTIONAL AREAS
On July 1 and 6, 2011 S &ME conducted a pedestrian review of the ROW to delineate
jurisdictional surface waters located within the project corridor. S &ME followed the
procedures set forth in the 1987 US Army Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation
Manual and the Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Supplemental Guidance. Field
conditions were documented using USACE Routine Wetland Determination Data Forms,
as appropriate. The field review also included identification of tributaries (streams)
within the project corridor. Drainage features identified during the field review were
assessed to determine the jurisdictional status of the tributary. Drainage features were
classified as either non - jurisdictional or jurisdictional. S &ME used the NC Division of
Water Quality (DWQ) Stream Classification Form to document characteristics of
identified drainage features on the day of the assessment.
Field review identified 10 regulated surface waters within the project corridor (six
wetlands and five streams), as identified below:
• Wetland A is a palustrine scrub -shrub and forested (PSS/FO) wetland that
receives drainage from adjacent wetlands. Dominant vegetation includes
boxelder, black willow (Salix nigra), broadleaf arrowhead (Sagittaria latifolia),
rice -cut grass (Leersia oryzoides), and jewelweed (Impatiens capensis). Hydric
soil indicators include a depleted matrix within 10 inches of the soil surface.

Re- authorization of NWP No. 12M/QC No. 3884 SWE Project No. 1357 -11 -005
PNG Huntersville Strengthening December 17, 2012
Wetland hydrology includes saturated soil at the surface and wetland drainage
patterns. Wetland A drains directly to McDowell Creek.
• Wetland B is a narrow, linear feature that receives drainage from a small tree
farm. Dominant vegetation includes beggars ticks (Bidens aristolosa), painted
ladies thumb (Polygonum persicaria), broadleaf arrowhead, and false nettle
(Boehmeria cylindrica). However, regular mowing and possible herbicide
application have removed most species. Hydric soil indicators include a depleted
matrix. Wetland hydrology includes silt deposits on plants and wetland drainage
patterns. Wetland B drains directly into McDowell Creek.
• Wetland C is a palustrine forested (PFO) wetland depression located within the
floodplain of Torrence Creek. Wetland hydrology is supported by runoff from
upland drainage and a high water table. Dominant vegetation includes green ash
(Fraxinus pennsylvanica), sycamore, sweetgum , red maple, American elm
(Ulmus americana), Chinese privet, lizards tail (Saururus cernuus), and
jewelweed. Hydric soil indicators present include a depleted matrix located
within the upper 10 inches of the soil and concretions. Wetland hydrology
indicators include water stained leaves and wetland drainage patterns.
• Wetland D is a narrow, palustrine emergent wetland (PEM) located within the
floodplain of Stream 4. This linear feature drains adjacent land and may have
been created during construction of the nearby housing development. Hydric soil
indicators present include a depleted matrix within 10 inches of the soil surface.
Wetland hydrology indicators present include soil saturation within 10 inches of
the soil surface and wetland drainage patterns.
• Wetlands E and F are similar to Wetland D. These are linear drainage features
likely created as part of an overall stormwater management system for the
housing development located to the north of the ROW; they each drain directly to
Stream 4.
• Stream 1 is an unnamed, perennial tributary to McDowell Creek. Within the
review area, this channel is 6 to 7 feet wide with banks 4 to 5 feet high. Perennial
stream indicators include the strong presence of a bed and bank, particle size
distribution, strong presence of baseflow, and the presence of fish.
• Stream 2 (McDowell Creek) is a USGS named, perennial stream that converges
with Torrence Creek immediately south of the ROW. Within the review area, this
channel is 25 to 30 feet wide with banks 7 to 9 feet high.
• Stream 3 is an unnamed, perennial tributary to Torrence Creek. Within the
review area, this channel is 10 to 12 feet wide with banks 4 to 5 feet high.
Perennial stream indicators include the presence of a continuous bed and bank,
evidence of a seasonal high water table, and the presence of fish.
C.

Re- authorization of NWP No. 12M/QC No. 3884 SWE Project No. 1357 -11 -005
PNG Huntersville Strengthening December 17, 2012
• Stream 4 is a third - order, perennial stream. Within the review, area the channel is
10 to 15 feet wide with banks 4 to 5 feet deep. Stream 4 flows to the southwest
for approximately 3,000 linear feet before converging with Torrence Creek.
Stream 4 will not be affected by the proposed project.
Results of S &ME's assessment were included in a Request for Jurisdictional
Determination package and provided to the USACE on July 13, 2011. The USACE
(Steve Kichefski) visited the project site on August 22, 2011 and concurred with S &ME's
findings.
PROPOSED PROJECT IMPACTS
The proposed project involves temporary wetland impacts that will occur as a result of
trench excavation, temporary sidecasting of material and placement of temporary
crossings for the equipment access. The project will result in conversion of forested
wetlands to herbaceous wetlands, but will not result in a loss of waters of the U.S. As
previously mentioned, temporarily- impacted wetlands, along with the TWS used during
construction, will be restored to their original grade and contour. Temporary stream
impacts will result from hand - removal of bank vegetation and placement of equipment
maps. Wetland and stream, impacts are identified in their respective tables in Appendix
II.
Project -wide wetland impacts (combined temporary and conversion) will be 0.990 acre,
much of which consists of herbaceous wetlands located within existing ROW. Of those
total impacts, maintenance of the new ROW will result in conversion of 0.059 acre of
forested wetland to herbaceous wetlands. The 10 -foot TWS will be restored, seeded and
allowed to return to its pre- disturbance vegetative condition, and will not result in
conversion, as future mowing or maintenance will not occur in the 10 -foot TWS
following construction.
The project will result in temporary impacts to 209 linear feet of stream through
placement of equipment bridges and temporary hand - removal of bank vegetation. All
streams will be crossed by "trenchless" methods.
Typical stream and wetland crossings details are depicted on Sheet 12 of 12 in Appendix
IV. Following construction, temporarily- disturbed wetlands within the permanent ROW
will be restored to an herbaceous state, while those within the TWS will be restored and
allowed to return to a forested condition. Affected streambanks will be reconstructed to
their pre- disturbance dimension and profile, and stabilized using coir matting and
vegetative plantings, without use of riprap or hard armoring.
PROTECTED SPECIES
To comply with applicable sections of the Endangered Species Act (ESA) of 1973 (16
USC 1531- 1543), S &ME submitted scoping letters to the North Carolina Natural
Heritage Program (NCNHP) and the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. The scoping
packages were sent on April 25, 2011, and included U.S.G.S. topographic maps and
aerial photographs of the project route. The scoping packages requested that each agency

Re- authorization of NWP No. 12M/QC No. 3884 SWE Project No. 1357 -11 -005
PNG Huntersville Strengthening December 17, 2012
review records they may have had relating to rare, endangered, or threatened species, or
high quality natural communities within the vicinity of the project corridor, and provide
comment.
The NCNHP responded with May 9, 2011 letter recommending that the project be routed
on the north side of the McDowell /Torrence Creek confluence in order to avoid higher
slopes of an adjacent natural area. The NCNHP also stated that the significantly rare
northern cup plant (Silphium perfoliatum) had been identified in the vicinity in 1995, and
that S &ME review the area to identify any such populations.
In response, PNG has routed the proposed pipeline on the north side of the creek, thus
avoiding the aforementioned slopes located to the south. S &ME also performed as
assessment of the proposed project corridor on July 13, 2011, but did not identify
populations of northern cup plant on the north side of the creek.
The USFWS responded with a May 11, 2011 letter in which they requested that the
project area be surveyed for the federally - protected Schweinitz's sunflower (Helianthus
schweinitzii) and Georgia aster (Symphyotrichum georgianum), a federal candidate for
listing.
The USFWS also recommended use of directional boring methods at stream crossings,
and that corridor widths at stream crossing be minimized. At areas where boring cannot
be performed, crossings should be made perpendicular to the stream flow, and
development of a stream -bank monitoring and maintenance program to allow for prompt
stabilization of stream banks throughout the life of this project should be employed.
Lastly, the USFWS recommended that, given the proximity of the project to aquatic
environments, measures to control sediment and erosion should be installed before
ground disturbing activities occur. Grading and backfilling should be minimized, and
existing vegetation should be retained (if possible) to maintain shoreline cover for fish
and wildlife.
S &ME's assessment of the project corridor identified potentially - suitable habitat for
Schweinitz's sunflower and Georgia aster (the existing maintained sewerline) but, no
individuals of this species were observed during the field review. With respect to stream
crossings, PNG plans to conduct all crosses via HDD or bore. PNG will also implement
a plan to restore affected crossings to their original contours and stabilize affected banks
through use of coir fabric, a native, riparian seed mix and deep- rooted woody plantings in
lieu of rip -rap or hard armoring.
Copies of the May 9, 2011 NCNHP and May 11, 2011 USFWS correspondence letters
are included in Appendix V.
HISTORIC AND ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES
In response to a scoping letter submitted by S &ME to the North Carolina State Historic
Preservation Office (SHPO), the SHPO requested that a comprehensive archaeological
survey be conducted of the proposed project area. In addition, consultation with the

Re- authorization of NWP No. 12M/QC No. 3884 SWE Project No. 1357 -11 -005
PNG Huntersville Strengthening December 17, 2012
Office of State Archaeology (OSA) was required prior to the archaeological survey to
determine the appropriate field methodology. The resultant field methodology included
shovel test pits at 100 -foot intervals in high- probability areas and 200 - footintervals in
disturbed areas or areas having good surface visibility. In the vicinity of historic property
MK1482 (the James G. Torrance Mill Ruin), shovel test pits were excavated at 15 -foot
intervals to better define the site boundaries of the local landmark.
As a result of the survey, no new archaeological sites and no previously unrecorded
structures were identified. Three previously recorded historic properties were revisited.
Cedar Grove (MK5) is listed in the National Register of Historic Places (NRHP). The
other two historic properties, the Hugh Torrance House and Store (MK5) and the James
G. Torrance Mill Ruin (MK1482), are recommended eligible for inclusion in the NRHP.
All three properties are designated Charlotte - Mecklenburg Historic Landmarks.
Based on the results of the archaeological survey, it is the opinion of S &ME that no
further archaeological investigations are needed along the proposed pipeline corridor.
The Hugh Torrance House and Store (MK5) is recommended eligible for inclusion in the
NRHP, but is located approximately 720 ft from the proposed project corridor and will
not be affected by the undertaking. Cedar Grove (MK4) and approximately eight acres of
surrounding property are listed in the NRHP, but the house and property are both located
north of Gilead Road, approximately 620 ft from the proposed project corridor and will
not be affected by the project. However, the Cedar Grove plantation house and
approximately 32 acres of property are designated as a Charlotte - Mecklenburg Historic
Landmark. Currently, the proposed project corridor crosses this designated property
along Torrance Creek, south of Gilead Road. Because of its local landmark designation,
PNG consulted with the Charlotte- Mecklenburg Landmarks Commission and received
their concurrence.
The James G. Torrance Mill Ruin is recommended eligible for inclusion in the NRHP.
The project corridor currently crosses a small portion of the 0.7 acre tract that is
designated as a Charlotte - Mecklenburg Historic Landmark. The project crosses a portion
of the millrace which has been mostly filled in and is difficult to recognize as a historic
mill feature. There were no archaeological resources associated with the mill found
during the Phase I survey and the proposed pipeline will be installed using HDD
techniques. As proposed, the project would have no adverse effect on the James G.
Torrance Mill Ruin.
Concurrence letters from the SHPO dated August 31, 2011 and December 1, 2011 are
included in Appendix V.
AVOIDANCE AND MINIMIZATION
To avoid and minimize impacts to waters of the U.S. within the project corridor, PNG has
proposed to install the new gas pipeline parallel to an existing, maintained pipeline ROW
wherever possible. One stream within the project corridor will be avoided entirely, and
the remainder will be crossed via trenchless methods. Combined temporary wetland
impacts and permanent conversion is limited to less than 0.10 acre.

Re- authorization of NWP No. 12M/QC No. 3884 SWE Project No. 1357 -11 -005
PNG Huntersville Strengthening December 17, 2012
Where streams are hand - cleared of vegetation and crossed with equipments mats, impacts
will be minimized by stabilizing the temporarily- affected banks with coir matting and
deep- rooted vegetation rather than riprap. Wetland impacts will also be minimized
during construction through the use of equipment mats at crossings and trench plugs to
prevent alterations to wetland hydrology.
Additionally, construction equipment operating within the wetland will be limited to that
necessary for clearing, excavation, pipe installation and restoration activities. Wetland
vegetation outside of the trench line will be cut at ground level, leaving existing root
systems in place to promote re- growth. To the extent practicable, wetland topsoil will be
segregated from the underlying subsoil in areas disturbed by trenching, except in areas
with standing water or saturated soils, or where no topsoil is evident. Within wetlands,
yearly vegetation maintenance will only be conducted within a 30 -foot corridor centered
on the new pipe. Remaining portions of the proposed ROW in wetlands will be seeded
with a wetland seed mix and allowed to revegetate naturally.
REGULATORY CONSIDERATIONS
The project will comply with all applicable conditions of NWP 12 and WQC 3884, with
the exception of those noted previously. The combined width of the TWS and the
permanent ROW will not exceed 40 feet in wetlands and at stream crossings, 10 feet of
which will not be maintained following construction. The proposed alignment makes use
of existing ROW to the maximum extent practicable.
All Stream work will be performed "in the dry" by isolating the work area through use of
dam and pump- around or dam and flume systems.
Following construction, stream and wetland crossings will be restored to original grade
and contour. The proposed project will not result in permanent changes in pre -
construction elevation contours or stream dimension, pattern or profile. Excess material
will be removed to a high ground disposal area. Cleared areas will be restored in
accordance with the attached Restoration Plan (Appendix VI) following completion of
the work.
Based on our experience with similar projects involving impacts authorized under NWP
No. 12, it is our understanding that impacts to streams and wetlands resulting from
construction of the proposed project will be considered temporary if these areas are
restored to original pre - construction contours once construction is completed, and do not
involve the permanent placement of hard armor in streams.
SEDIMENT AND EROSION CONTROL
Appropriate sediment and erosion control practices outlined in the most recent version of
the "North Carolina Sediment and Erosion Control Planning and Design Manual" and
approved by the local governing authority shall be in compliance with specifications
governing the proper design, installation, operation and maintenance of such Best
Management Practices to comply with the appropriate turbidity water quality standard.
Sediment and erosion control measures placed in waters will be removed and the original
10

Re- authorization of NWP No. 12M/QC No. 3884 SWE Project No. 1357 -11 -005
PNG Huntersville Strengthening December 17, 2012
grade restored. Appropriate measures will be taken during construction to allow flow and
circulation patterns of waters of the U.S. to remain unaffected.
MITIGATION
The project will not result in a loss of waters of the U.S. Conversion of forested
wetlands to herbaceous wetlands will not exceed 0.10 acre. Accordingly, mitigation
beyond the avoidance and minimization efforts detailed in this letter should not be
required by the USACE. Further, mitigation for wetland impacts that do not exceed one
acre is not required by DWQ.
Stream impacts associated with the project are also temporary and do not require
mitigation. The bed and banks of temporarily- affected stream channels will be restored
to their original dimension and profile, and stabilized with coir matting. Riprap will not
be employed. At both stream crossings and wetlands, PNG will use native seed mixes to
provide soil stabilization. Additionally, native woody vegetation will be installed at
stream crossings. The Restoration Plan submitted with this PCN outlines the seed mixes
and application methods (Appendix VI).
Mitigation has also been provided by avoidance and minimization procedures
implemented during the design phase of the proposed project. Impacts to streams and
wetlands within the project corridor will be minimized by: 1) use of the existing,
maintained ROW; 2) extensive use of trenchless crossings; and 3) by reducing both the
temporary construction and permanently maintained corridor widths to the minimum
necessary to adequately construct and maintain the project.
LOCAL ORDINANCES AND CONSERVATION EASEMENT
ENCROACHMENT
The project will result in impacts to water quality buffers subject to jurisdiction of
Charlotte - Mecklenburg County Storm Water Services ( CMSWS), but is exempt from the
associated mitigation requirements. Impacts to the buffers were coordinated with
CMSWS, and approved on January 24, 2012.
The project will also encroach within a portion of property subject to a proposed
conservation easement (CE). The CE was proposed in connection with the neighboring
Torrence Creek Stream Restoration Project, which is part of the City of Charlotte's
Umbrella Mitigation Bank. PNG coordinated the pipeline routing efforts with CMSWS
and City of Charlotte Real Estate Office personnel. In conjunction with the USACE, the
City determined the appropriate value by which the gasline would reduce future credit
available from the mitigation bank. Accordingly, PNG has appropriately compensate the
City for the loss of credit resulting from the pipeline's encroachment within the CE.
SECONDARY AND CUMULATIVE IMPACTS
The primary purpose of the project is to alleviate drops in pressure experienced by the
existing distribution gas line systems during peak demands, and upgrade a segment of
aging natural gas pipeline to accommodate existing development in the service area.
Accordingly, the project should not be considered growth- inducing in that it is unlikely to
11

Re- authorization of NWP No. 12M/QC No. 3884 SWE Project No. 1357 -11 -005
PNG Huntersville Strengthening December 17, 2012
serve as an impetus for expansion of development, and should not result in secondary
impacts, or contribute to cumulative impacts.
CLOSING
By copy of this correspondence and completed PCN, we are requesting your written
concurrence with this NWP No. 12 permit application. If you have questions or need
additional information, please feel free to contact us at 704.523.4726.
Sincerely,
S &ME
Toey L ler, P.W.S.
Senior Project Manager
jlawlergsmeinc.com
Senior Reviewed by Julie Bennett - Hudel, P.G., LEED AP
Attachments
12

FIGURES

i Bret .
{
� � � r.Y
Oxfordshire
3
\ \ Toe
4 m
NO
Lewd. !,I
L 6!
..... .may r.. _
"
A S
Wild Lilac Ck x ux
e Q r�LeW0ak
�Yr
S �
N ti
c
:E o °'
m
A
Stawell Dr
Gilead Rd
r �
13
Shepparton Dr
ore Cut, Rd
'e d a
c : ti ores \fir �¢ \`t GG0 h
e
4P� � 1
T-
Proposed 'Align ment
REFERENCE: USGS 1996 LAKE NORMAN SOUTH AND CORNELIUS [NC] QUAD SHEETS
THE ABOVE INFORMATION WAS OBTAINED FROM THE USDA GEOSPATIAL DATA GATEWAY WEBSITE. PLEASE
NOTE THIS MAP IS FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY. IT IS NOT MEANT FOR DESIGN, LEGAL, OR ANY
OTHER USES. THERE ARE NO GUARANTEES ABOUT ITS ACCURACY. S &ME, INC. ASSUMES NO RESPONSIBILITY
FOR ANY DECISION MADE OR ANY ACTIONS TAKEN BY THE USER BASED UPON THIS INFORMATION.
2,000 31000
Feet
SCALE: AS SHOWN FIGURE
USGS TOPOGRAPHIC MAP NO.
DATE: 10.20.11 REV
S&ME
PNG Huntersville Strengthening Project
DRAWN BY: DDH /CJF Mecklenburg County, North Carolina
CHECKED BY: WWW.SMEINC.COM
JoL PROJECT No: 1357 -11 -005

APPENDIX I:
COMPLETED PRE - CONSTRUCTION NOTIFICATION (PCN),
AUTHORIZATION TO ACT AS AGENT AND COPIES OF ORIGINAL
PERMIT APPROVAL LETTERS

O�OF�w ArE�R�G
Office Use Only:
Corps action ID no.
DWQ project no.
Form Version 1.3 Dec 10 2008
Page 1 of 14
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
Pre - Construction Notification PCN Form
A. Applicant Information
1.
Processing
1 a.
Type(s) of approval sought from the
Corps:
®Section 404 Permit El Section 10 Permit
1 b.
Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number: 12 or General Permit (GP) number:
1 c.
Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps?
® Yes
❑ No
1 d.
Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply):
® 401 Water Quality Certification — Regular ❑ Non -404 Jurisdictional General Permit
❑ 401 Water Quality Certification — Express ❑ Riparian Buffer Authorization
1 e.
Is this notification solely for the record
because written approval is not required?
For the record only for DWQ 401
Certification:
❑ Yes ® No
For the record only for Corps Permit:
❑ Yes ® No
1f.
Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for mitigation
of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank or in -lieu
fee program.
❑ Yes
® No
1 g.
Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties. If yes, answer 1 In
below.
❑ Yes
® No
1 h.
Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)?
❑ Yes
® No
2.
Project Information
2a.
Name of project:
Permit Reauthorization - PNG Huntersville Strengthening Project
2b.
County:
Mecklenburg
2c.
Nearest municipality / town:
Huntersville
2d.
Subdivision name:
N/A
2e.
NCDOT only, T.I.P. or state
project no:
N/A
3.
Owner Information
3a.
Name(s) on Recorded Deed:
Piedmont Natural Gas
3b.
Deed Book and Page No.
3c.
Responsible Party (for LLC if
applicable):
3d.
Street address:
4720 Piedmont Row Drive
3e.
City, state, zip:
Charlotte N.C. 28210
3f.
Telephone no.:
704.731.4375
3g.
Fax no.:
704.731.4098
3h.
Email address:
david.vena @piedmontng.com
Page 1 of 14
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

4.
Applicant Information (if different from owner)
4a.
Applicant is:
❑ Agent ® Other, specify: Utility Company
4b.
Name:
Dave Vena, P.E,
4c.
Business name
(if applicable):
Piedmont Natural Gas
4d.
Street address:
4720 Piedmont Row Drive
4e.
City, state, zip:
Charlotte N.C. 28210
4f.
Telephone no.:
704.731.4375
4g.
Fax no.:
704.731.4098
4h.
Email address:
david.vena @piedmontng.com
5.
Agent/Consultant Information (if applicable)
5a.
Name:
Joey Lawler, P.W.S.
5b.
Business name
(if applicable):
S &ME, Inc.
5c.
Street address:
9751 Southern Pine Boulevard
5d.
City, state, zip:
Charlotte, N.C. 28723
5e.
Telephone no.:
704.523.4726
5f.
Fax no.:
704.525.3853
5g.
Email address:
jlawler @smeinc.com
Page 2 of 14
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

B.
Project Information and Prior Project History
1.
Property Identification
1 a.
Property identification no. (tax PIN or parcel ID):
Project is a linear utility line
1 b.
Site coordinates (in decimal degrees):
Latitude: origin:35.4053 N; terminus: 35.4044 N
Longitude: - origin:- 80.9017 W; terminus: 80.8695 W
(DD.DDDDDD) (- DD.DDDDDD)
1 c.
Property size:
Approximately 9 acres
2.
Surface Waters
2a.
Name of nearest body of water (stream, river, etc.) to
proposed project:
Torrence Creek (DWQ No. 11- 115 -4)
2b.
Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water:
WS -IV
2c.
River basin:
Catawba 03050101
Page 3 of 14
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

3.
Project Description
3a.
Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this
application:
A majority of the project will occur within or adjacent to existing, mainatined utility corridors. General land use in the
vicinity of the project corridor consists of mix of residential areas, a greenway, forest and open areas. Primary natural
habitat types consist of maintained utility corrdiors, pine and hardwood forests and floodplains. A variety of other land
use areas are located along the project corridor, and include landscaped or maintained lawns, roadway rights -of -way
(ROWs) or lightly - developed areas.
3b.
List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property:
Approximately 9 acres
3c.
List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property:
Approximately 300 linear feet
3d.
Explain the purpose of the proposed project:
The primary purpose of the project is to alleviate drops in pressure experienced by the existing distribution gas line
systems during peak demands, and to provide adequate capacity pursuant to the required service level in Huntersville
and its immediate vicinity.
3e.
Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
Construction will first involve identification of the clearing limits, followed by removal of aboveground woody vegetation
from the proposed ROW and TWS either by mechanical means or hand - clearing, as appropriate. Efforts will be made to
remove trees in a manner that minimizes disturbance of the forest floor, and prevents exposure of soil. No grubbing or
belowground vegetation removal will occur within wetlands, or along streambanks outside of the temporary crossing
footprints. Select portions of the ROW and TWS may require rough grading to facilitate safe passage of equipment, and
to prepare a suitably -level work surface. Appropriate sediment and erosion control measures will be installed following
initial soil disturbance as the project progresses.
Where wetlands or streams will be crossed, the width of the ROW subject to vegetation removal will be dictated by the
method employed to construct the pipeline:
Method 1: HDD or bored crossings (collectively referred to as "trenchless crossings ") will involve aboveground removal of
vegetation within the proposed corridor that will not exceed 40 feet in width. A temporary equipment crossing will be
installed along one side of the ROW to facilitate equipment passage and prevent excessive rutting and ground
disturbance in wetlands and streams. Streams will be bridged by use of bolted timber mats, modified railcars or similar
measures that limit temporary bank impacts. No other impacts will be associated with this type of crossing.
Method 2: At wetland and stream crossings that will be constructed using traditional trenching methods, vegetation will be
removed within the 40 -foot combined ROW and TWS corridor. Timber mats /bridges will be again be employed for
equipment to work and travel on. Appropriate sediment and erosion control measures will be installed at all crossings to
prevent sedimentation of jurisdictional features as a result of construction. Streambank vegetation within the corridor will
be hand cleared, and introduction of logging debris into streams or wetlands will be avoided to the extent practicable.
In general, the pipe will be trucked to the site from a temporary storage yard, strung along the ROW and placed on skids
(wooden pedestals). Specialized machines will be used to bend individual segments of pipe to fit the contours of the
trench where necessary. The pipe segments will be welded together, x -rayed and inspected for structural integrity, and
then lowered into the trench. Segments of the trench may require dewatering or "padding" to prevent large rocks or other
debris from coming in contact with the pipe. Permanent trench breakers will then be installed where necessary and the
trench backfilled. In areas where segregation of the subsoil and topsoil is required (wetlands), the topsoil will be replaced
last. Affected areas will then be "cleaned up" by rough - grading and temporary seeding (if necessary), followed by final
grading, permanent seeding and mulching to restore the ROW as closely as possible to pre- disturbance contours and
conditions.
Areas within wetlands that are disturbed will be seeded with a customized wetland seed mix. Areas outside of the
permanently maintained ROW will be allowed to revegetate naturally. Streambanks temporarily affected by removal of
bank vegetation and placement of the equipment bridge will be stabilized with a separate native seed mix specifically
designed for riparian areas, placement of coir matting, and installation of native woody plantings (livestakes or tubelings).
No riprap will be employed on the streambanks following construction.
Page 4 of 14
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

4. Jurisdictional Determinations
4a. Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the
Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property /
El Yes El No ®Unknown
project (including all prior phases) in the past?
Comments:
4b. If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination, what type
®Preliminary El Final
of determination was made?
4c. If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas?
Agency /Consultant Company: S &ME, Inc.
Name (if known):
Other:
4d. If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation.
On July 1 and 6, 2011 S &ME delineated jurisdictional surface waters located within the project corridor. Results of the
delineation were included in a Request for Jurisdictional Determination package provided to the USACE on July 13, 2011.
The USACE (Steve Kichefski) visited the project site on August 22, 2011 and concurred with S &ME's findings.
5. Project History
5a. Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for
® Yes ❑ No ❑ Unknown
this project (including all prior phases) in the past?
5b. If yes, explain in detail according to "help file" instructions.
The project as currently proposed was approved by the USACE on January 30, 2012 (Action ID No. 2012 - 00182) and by
NCDWQ on January 23, 2012 (Project No. 11- 1126). Subsequent to permit authorization, PNG encountered delays in
property acquisition, coordination with the City's plans to construct a bicycle path on the adjoining greenway, and
approval from the Charlotte - Mecklenburg Historic Landmarks Commission regarding a Certificate of Appropriateness for
construction of the project near the Torrence Mill historic site. Since that time, the land has been acquired, arrangements
have been made to accommodate the City, and the Certificate of Appropriateness has been acquired. PNG is now ready
to move forward with the project as it was originally proposed, but needs to acquire new permits, as both the existing
NWP and WQC have expired.
6. Future Project Plans
6a. Is this a phased project?
❑ Yes ® No
6b. If yes, explain.
N/A
Page 5 of 14
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

C. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
1 a. Which sections were completed below for your project (check all that apply):
® Wetlands ® Streams - tributaries ❑ Buffers
❑ Open Waters ❑ Pond Construction
2. Wetland Impacts
If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted.
2a.
2b.
2c.
2d.
2e.
2f.
Wetland impact
Type of jurisdiction
number —
Type of impact
Type of wetland
Forested
(Corps - 404, 10
Area of impact
Permanent (P) or
(if known)
DWQ — non -404, other)
(acres)
Temporary (T)
W1 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
W2 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
W3 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
W4 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
W5 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
W6 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
2g. Total wetland impacts
2h. Comments: See attached Wetland Impact Table in Appendix II
3. Stream Impacts
If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this
question for all stream sites impacted.
3a.
3b.
3c.
3d.
3e.
3f.
3g.
Stream impact
Type of impact
Stream name
Perennial
Type of jurisdiction
Average
Impact
number -
(PER) or
(Corps - 404, 10
stream
length
Permanent (P) or
intermittent
DWQ — non -404,
width
(linear
Temporary (T)
(INT)?
other)
(feet)
feet)
S1 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ PER
❑ Corps
❑ INT
❑ DWQ
S2 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ PER
❑ Corps
❑ INT
❑ DWQ
S3 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ PER
❑ Corps
❑ INT
❑ DWQ
S4 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ PER
❑ Corps
❑ INT
❑ DWQ
S5 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ PER
❑ Corps
❑ INT
❑ DWQ
S6 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ PER
❑ Corps
❑ INT
❑ DWQ
3h. Total stream and tributary impacts
3i. Comments: See Attached Stream Impact Table in Appendix II
Page 6 of 14
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

4. Open Water Impacts
If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of
the U.S. then individually list all open water impacts below.
4a.
4b.
4c.
4d.
4e.
Open water
Name of waterbody
impact number -
(if applicable)
Type of impact
Waterbody type
Area of impact (acres)
Permanent (P) or
Temporary (T)
01 ❑P ❑T
02 ❑P ❑T
03 ❑P ❑T
04 ❑P ❑T
4f. Total open water impacts
4g. Comments: No open -water impacts will occur.
5. Pond or Lake Construction
If pond or lake construction proposed, then complete the chart below.
5a.
5b.
5c.
5d.
5e.
Wetland Impacts (acres)
Stream Impacts (feet)
Upland
Pond ID
Proposed use or purpose
(acres)
number
of pond
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
Flooded
P1
P2
5f. Total
5g. Comments:
5h. Is a dam high hazard permit required?
❑ Yes ❑ No If yes, permit ID no:
5i. Expected pond surface area (acres):
5j. Size of pond watershed (acres):
5k. Method of construction:
6. Buffer Impacts (for DWQ)
If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below. If yes, then individually list all buffer impacts
below. If any impacts require mitigation, then you MUST fill out Section D of this form.
6a.
❑ Neuse ❑ Tar - Pamlico ❑ Other:
Project is in which protected basin?
❑ Catawba ❑ Randleman
6b.
6c.
6d.
6e.
6f.
6g.
Buffer impact
number -
Reason
Buffer
Zone 1 impact
Zone 2 impact
Permanent (P) or
for
Stream name
mitigation
(square feet)
(square feet)
Temporary (T)
impact
required?
B1 ❑P ❑T
El Yes
❑ No
B2 ❑P ❑T
El Yes
❑ No
B3 ❑P ❑T
El Yes
❑ No
6h. Total buffer impacts
6i. Comments: N/A
Page 7 of 14
PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

D. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
1 a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project.
To avoid and minimize impacts to waters of the U.S. within the project corridor, PNG has proposed to install the new gas
pipeline parallel to an existing, maintained pipeline ROW wherever possible. One stream within the project corridor will be
avoided entirely, and the remainder will be crossed via trenchless methods.
1 b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques.
Where streams are hand - cleared of vegetation and crossed with equipments mats, impacts will be minimized by stabilizing the
temporarily- affected banks with coir matting and deep- rooted vegetation rather than riprap. Wetland impacts will also be
minimized during construction through the use of equipment mats at crossings and trench plugs to prevent alterations to
wetland hydrology.
Additionally, construction equipment operating within the wetland will be limited to that necessary for clearing, excavation, pipe
installation and restoration activities. Wetland vegetation outside of the trench line will be cut at ground level, leaving existing
root systems in place to promote re- growth. To the extent practicable, wetland topsoil will be segregated from the underlying
subsoil in areas disturbed by trenching, except in areas with standing water or saturated soils, or where no topsoil is evident.
Within wetlands, yearly vegetation maintenance will only be conducted within a 30 -foot corridor centered on the new pipe.
Remaining portions of the proposed ROW in wetlands will be seeded with a wetland seed mix and allowed to revegetate
naturally.
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for
❑ Yes ® No
impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State?
2b. If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply):
❑ DWQ ❑ Corps
❑ Mitigation bank
2c. If yes, which mitigation option will be used for this
El Payment to in -lieu fee program
project?
❑ Permittee Responsible Mitigation
3. Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank
3a. Name of Mitigation Bank: N/A
3b. Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter)
Type
Quantity
3c. Comments: N/A
4. Complete if Making a Payment to In -lieu Fee Program
4a. Approval letter from in -lieu fee program is attached.
❑ Yes
4b. Stream mitigation requested:
0 linear feet
4c. If using stream mitigation, stream temperature:
❑ warm ❑ cool ❑cold
4d. Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only):
0 square feet
4e. Riparian wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4f. Non - riparian wetland mitigation requested:
0 acres
4g. Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested:
0 acres
4h. Comments:
5. Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
5a. If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan.
N/A
Page 8of14
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

6. Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) — required by DWQ
6a. Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires
❑ Yes ® No
buffer mitigation?
6b. If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation. Calculate the
amount of mitigation required.
6c.
6d.
6e.
Zone
Reason for impact
Total impact
Multiplier
Required mitigation
(square feet)
(square feet)
Zone 1
3 (2 for Catawba)
Zone 2
1.5
6f. Total buffer mitigation required:
6g. If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e.g., payment to private mitigation bank,
permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in -lieu fee fund).
N/A
6h. Comments:
Page 9 of 14
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

E. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ)
1.
Diffuse Flow Plan
1 a.
Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified
❑ Yes ® No
within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
1 b.
If yes, then is a diffuse flow plan included? If no, explain why.
Comments: Project is a linear utility constructed belowground. The ROW will remain
❑ Yes ® No
grassed with no imperveous surfaces.
2.
Stormwater Management Plan
2a.
What is the overall percent imperviousness of this project?
>1 %
2b.
Does this project require a Stormwater Management Plan?
❑ Yes ® No
2c.
If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why:
2d.
If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan, then provide a brief, narrative description of the plan:
N/A
❑ Certified Local Government
2e.
Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan?
❑ DWQ Stormwater Program
❑ DWQ 401 Unit
3.
Certified Local Government Stormwater Review
3a.
In which local government's jurisdiction is this project?
❑ Phase II
3b.
Which of the following locally - implemented stormwater management programs
❑ NSW
❑ USMP
apply (check all that apply):
❑ Water Supply Watershed
❑ Other:
3c.
Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
❑ Yes ❑ No
attached?
4.
DWQ Stormwater Program Review
❑ Coastal counties
❑ HQW
4a.
Which of the following state - implemented stormwater management programs apply
❑ ORW
(check all that apply):
❑ Session Law 2006 -246
❑ Other:
4b.
Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
attached?
❑ Yes ❑ No
5.
DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review
5a.
Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements?
❑ Yes ❑ No
5b.
Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met?
❑ Yes ❑ No
Page 10 of 14
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

F.
Supplementary Information
1.
Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement)
1 a.
Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal /state /local) funds or the
❑ Yes
® No
use of public (federal /state) land?
1 b.
If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an
environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State
❑ Yes
❑ No
(North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
1 c.
If you answered "yes" to the above, has the document review been finalized by the
State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval
letter.)
❑ Yes
❑ No
Comments: N/A
2.
Violations (DWQ Requirement)
2a.
Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated
Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards,
❑ Yes
® No
or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)?
2b.
Is this an after - the -fact permit application?
❑ Yes
® No
2c.
If you answered "yes" to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s):
N/A
3.
Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement)
3a.
Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in
❑ Yes
® No
additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?
3b.
If you answered "yes" to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the
most recent DWQ policy. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
The project is not considered a "growth- inducing" in that the primary purpose of the pipeline is to upgarde capacity within
an existing service area.
4.
Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement)
4a.
Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non- discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from
the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
The project is a natural gas pipeline and will not generate waste water.
Page 11 of 14
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or
❑ Yes ® No
habitat?
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act
® Yes ❑ No
impacts?
E:1 Raleigh
5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted.
® Asheville
5d. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical
Habitat?
S &ME submitted scoping letters to the North Carolina Natural Heritage Program ( NCNHP) and the U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service on April 25, 2011. The NCNHP responded with May 9, 2011 letter recommending that the project be routed on
the north side of the McDowell /Torrence Creek confluence in order to avoid higher slopes of an adjacent natural area.
The NCNHP also stated that the significantly rare northern cup plant (Silphium perfoliatum) had been identified in the
vicinity in 1995, and that S &ME review the area to identify any such populations. In response, PNG has routed the
proposed pipeline on the north side of the creek, thus avoiding the aforementioned slopes located to the south. S &ME
also performed as assessment of the proposed project corridor on July 13, 2011, but did not identify populations of
northern cup plant on the north side of the creek.
The USFWS responded with a May 11, 2011 letter in which they requested that the project area be surveyed for the
federally - protected Schweinitz's sunflower (Helianthus schweinitzii) and Georgia aster (Symphyotrichum georgianum), a
federal candidate for listing. The USFWS also recommended use of directional boring methods at stream crossings, and
that corridor widths at stream crossing be minimized. At areas where boring cannot be performed, crossings should be
made perpendicular to the stream flow, and development of a stream -bank monitoring and maintenance program to allow
for prompt stabilization of stream banks throughout the life of this project should be employed. Lastly, the USFWS
recommended that, given the proximity of the project to aquatic environments, measures to control sediment and erosion
should be installed before ground disturbing activities occur. Grading and backfilling should be minimized, and existing
vegetation should be retained (if possible) to maintain shoreline cover for fish and wildlife.
S &ME's assessment of the project corridor identified potentially - suitable habitat for Schweinitz's sunflower and Georgia
aster (the existing maintained sewerline), but no individuals of this species were observed during the field review. With
respect to stream crossings, PNG plans to conduct all crosses via HDD or bore. PNG will also implement a plan to
restore affected crossings to their original contours and stabilize affected banks through use of coir fabric, a native,
riparian seed mix and deep- rooted woody plantings in lieu of rip -rap or hard armoring.
Copies of the May 9, 2011 NCNHP and May 11, 2011 USFWS correspondence letters are included in Appendix V.
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat?
❑ Yes ® No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat?
hftp://ocean.floridamarine.org/efh_coral/ims/viewer.htm
Page 12 of 14
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal
governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation
❑ Yes ® No
status (e.g., National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in
North Carolina history and archaeology)?
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?
In response to a scoping letter submitted by S &ME to the North Carolina State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO), the
SHPO requested that a comprehensive archaeological survey be conducted of the proposed project area. In addition,
consultation with the Office of State Archaeology (OSA) was required prior to the archaeological survey to determine the
appropriate field methodology. The resultant field methodology included shovel test pits at 100 -foot intervals in high -
probability areas and 200 - footintervals in disturbed areas or areas having good surface visibility. In the vicinity of historic
property MK1482 (the James G. Torrance Mill Ruin), shovel test pits were excavated at 15 -foot intervals to better define
the site boundaries of the local landmark.
As a result of the survey, no new archaeological sites and no previously unrecorded structures were identified. Three
previously recorded historic properties were revisited. Cedar Grove (MK5) is listed in the National Register of Historic
Places (NRHP). The other two historic properties, the Hugh Torrance House and Store (MK5) and the James G. Torrance
Mill Ruin (MK1482), are recommended eligible for inclusion in the NRHP. All three properties are designated Charlotte -
Mecklenburg Historic Landmarks.
Based on the results of the archaeological survey, it is the opinion of S &ME that no further archaeological investigations
are needed along the proposed pipeline corridor. The Hugh Torrance House and Store (MK5) is recommended eligible for
inclusion in the NRHP, but is located approximately 720 ft from the proposed project corridor and will not be affected by
the undertaking. Cedar Grove (MK4) and approximately eight acres of surrounding property are listed in the NRHP, but
the house and property are both located north of Gilead Road, approximately 620 ft from the proposed project corridor
and will not be affected by the project. However, the Cedar Grove plantation house and approximately 32 acres of
property are designated as a Charlotte - Mecklenburg Historic Landmark. Currently, the proposed project corridor crosses
this designated property along Torrance Creek, south of Gilead Road. Because of its local landmark designation, PNG
consulted with the Charlotte- Mecklenburg Landmarks Commission to receive a Certificate of Appropriateness.
The James G. Torrance Mill Ruin is recommended eligible for inclusion in the NRHP. The project corridor currently
crosses a small portion of the 0.7 acre tract that is designated as a Charlotte - Mecklenburg Historic Landmark. The project
crosses a portion of the millrace which has been mostly filled in and is difficult to recognize as a historic mill feature.
There were no archaeological resources associated with the mill found during the Phase I survey and the proposed
pipeline will be installed using HDD techniques. As proposed, the project would have no adverse effect on the James G.
Torrance Mill Ruin.
Concurrence letters from the SHPO dated August 31, 2011 and December 1, 2011 is included in Appendix V.
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA- designated 100 -year floodplain?
® Yes ❑ No
8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements: The project will comply with all FEMA regulations.
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination? Available FEMA mapping
Joey Lawler, P.W.S.
12.17.12
Applicant /Agent's Printed Name
Date
Applicant /Agent's Signature
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant
Page 13 of 14
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

ENT Au1MORIZATION FORM
Date; 0720.11
Project Information
SAME Project Nerve
TYPe of Project:
Location:
*S &ME
PNG Hunterevllle Project
Jurisdidibrral Delineation, Nationwide Pem ling
Huntersvlge, Ifth Carolina
Property QwneriRepresentstive Information
Business Name
Mailing Address:
State, Zip Code:
Telephone No.
centact:
Agent Information
15utslness Name:
Street Address;
city, State, Zip ode;
Telephone No,
Contact:
Piedmont Natural Gas
4720 Piedmont Rove ID rive
Charloft, NC 2821 t?
704.731,4047
Mr. JarneS'AIklnS
WE, Inc.
9751 outhern Pink Boulevard
Charlotte, N.G. 28272
7G4.523,4726
Joey Lawler
AmMOzatillona k, .fi r liF on behalf of
tc MAa Signatsfil
i,nr l d {4 5 —hereby autho rite
{NWW of Landmmw or Itjedt 5ponacd
&1 E, Inc, to er~t as agent wish the USA E - NCDWQ in securing
Section 4011404 permil:u for the above - referenced project,

T.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
WILMINGTON DISTRICT
Action ID: 2012 -00182 County: Mecklenburg USGS Quad: NC- bake Norman South & Cornelius
Property Owner / Authorized Agent: Piedmont Natural Gas- Attn: Dave Vena
Address: 4720 Piedmont Row Drive
Charlotte, NC 28210
Telephone No.: 704- 731 -4375
Size and location of property (water body, road name /number, town, etc.): The project site is a 1.89 mile
natural gas line originating southeast of Baylis Drive and terminating at the intersection of Gilead
Road and McCoy Road west of I4untersville, Mecklenburg County, NC. Coordinates are: origin
35.4053 N 80.9017 W and terminus 35.4044 N 80.8695 W.
Description of projects area and activity: This permit authorizes temporary impacts of 209 linear feet
of stream channels and 0.04 acre of wetland impact. This also authorizes the permanent impacts to
0.059 acre of wetland due to conversion from forested to emergent in the maintained ROW.
Applicable Law: ® Section 404 (Clean Water Act, 33 USC 1344)
❑ Section 10 (Rivers and Harbors Act, 33 USC 403)
Authorization: Regional General Permit Number:
Nationwide Permit Number: 12
Summary of Authorized Impacts and Required Mitigation
impact ID 4
NWP /
GP 4
Open Water (ac)
Wetland (ac)
Stream (If)
Temporary
Permanent
Temporary
Permanent
Temporary
Permanent
SAW -2012-
00182
12
0.04
0.059
209
0
impact Totals
0.04
0.059
209
Total Loss of Waters of the U.S. (ac)
0
Total Loss of Waters of the U.S. (lf) 0
Required Wetland
Mitigation (ac)
0
Required Stream Mitigation (If) 1
0
Additional Remarks and/or Special Permit Conditions: Your work is authorized by the above referenced
permit provided it is accomplished in strict accordance with the attached conditions and your plans submitted on
December 22, 2011. Any violation of the attached conditions or deviation from your submitted plans may subject
the permittee to a stop work order, a restoration order and/or appropriate legal action.
This verification will remain valid until the expiration date identified below unless the nationwide authorization
is modified, suspended or revoked. If, prior to the expiration date identified below, the nationwide permit
authorization is reissued and/or modified, this verification will remain valid until the expiration date identified
below, provided it complies with all requirements of the modified nationwide permit. If the nationwide permit
authorization expires or is suspended, revoked, or is modified, such that the activity would no longer comply with
the terms and conditions of the nationwide permit, activities which have commenced (i.e., are under construction) or
are under contract to commence in reliance upon the nationwide permit, will remain authorized provided the activity
is completed within twelve months of the date of the nationwide permit's expiration, modification or revocation,

unless discretionary authority has been exercised on a case -by -case basis to modify, suspend or revoke the
authorization.
Activities subject to Section 404 (as indicated above) may also require an individual Section 401 Water Quality
Certification. You should contact the NC Division of Water Quality (telephone [phone]) to determine
Section 401 requirements.
For activities occurring within the twenty coastal counties subject to regulation under the Coastal Area
Management Act (CAMA), prior to beginning work you must contact the N.C. Division of Coastal Management.
This Department of the Army verification does not relieve the permittee of the responsibility to obtain any other
required Federal, State or local approvals /permits.
If there are any questions regarding this verification, any of the conditions of the Permit, or the Corps of
Engineers regulatory program, please contact Steve Kichefski at 828 -271 -7980.
Corps Regulatory Official Steve Kichefski 5 (V Date: January 30, 2012
Expiration Date of Verification: March 18, 2012

Determination of Jurisdiction:
A. ❑ Based on preliminary information, there appear to be waters of the US including wetlands within the above
described project area. This preliminary determination is not an appealable action under the Regulatory
Program Administrative Appeal Process ( Reference 33 CFR Part 331).
B. ❑ There are Navigable Waters of the United States within the above described project area subject to the
permit requirements of Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act and Section 404 of the Clean Water Act.
Unless there is a change in the law or our published regulations, this determination may be relied upon for a
period not to exceed five years from the date of this notification.
C. ® There are waters of the US and/or wetlands within the above described project area subject to the permit
requirements of Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (CWA)(33 USC § 1344). Unless there is a change in the
law or our published regulations, this determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years
from the date of this notification.
D. ❑ The jurisdictional areas within the above described project area have been identified under a previous action.
Please reference jurisdictional determination issued . Action ID
Basis of Jurisdictional Determination: The site contains wetlands that meet the criteria of the 1987 Corps
Delineation Manual and stream channels that exhibit indicators of ordinary high water marks. The stream channels
on the property are UTs to Torrence Creek and McDowell Creek. UT's to Torrrence Creek and McDowell Creek
flow to the Atlantic Ocean via Torrence Creek, McDowell Creek, Catawba River and the Santee- Cooper Rivera The
Catawba River is navigable -in -fact at the Mt. Island Lake Dam.
Attention USDA Program Participants
This delineation/determination has been conducted to identify the limits of Corps' Clean Water Act jurisdiction for
the particular site identified in this request. The delineation/determination may not be valid for the wetland
conservation provisions of the Food Security Act of 1985. If you or your tenant are USDA Program participants, or
anticipate participation in USDA programs, you should request a certified wetland determination from the local
office of the Natural Resources Conservation Service, prior to starting work.
Appeals Information: (This information does not apply to preliminary determinations as indicated by paragraph A.
above).
Attached to this verification is an approved jurisdictional determination. If you are not in agreement with that
approved jurisdictional determination, you can make an administrative appeal under 33 CFR 331. Enclosed you will
find a Notification of Appeal Process (NAP) fact sheet and request for appeal (RFA) form_ If you request to appeal
this determination you must submit a completed RFA form to the following address:
District Engineer, Wilmington Regulatory Program
Attn: Steve Kichefski, Project Manager
151 Patton Avenue, Room 208
Asheville, North Carolina 28801
In order for an RFA to be accepted by the Corps, the Corps must determine that it is complete, that it meets the
criteria for appeal under 33 CFR part 331.5, and that it has been received by the Division Office within 60 days of
the date of the NAP. Should you decide to submit an RFA form, it must be received at the above address within 60
days from the Issue Date below.
* *It is not necessary to submit an RFA form to the Division Office if you do not object to the determination in this
correspondence.

Corps Regulatory Official: Steve Kichefski k
Issue Date: January 30, 2012 Expiration Date: Five years from Issue Date
SURVEY PLATS, FIELD SKETCH, WETLAND DELINEATION FORMS, PROJECT PLANS, ETC.,
MUST BE ATTACHED TO THE FILE COPY OF THIS FORM, IF REQUIRED OR AVAILABLE.
Copy Furnished:
Joey Lawler, S &ME, 9751 Southern Pine Blvd, Charlotte, NC 78723

North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Beverly Eaves Perdue Charles Wakild, P. E. Dee Freeman
Governor Director Secretary
January 23, 2012
DWQ# 111126
Mecklenburg County
Mr. Dave Vena, P.E.
Piedmont Natural Gas
4720 Piedmont Row Dr.
Charlotte, NC 28210
Subject: PNG Huntersville Strengthening Project
APPROVAL of 401 Water Quality Certification with Additional Conditions
Dear Mr. Vena:
You have our approval, in accordance with the general certification and those conditions listed below,
to impact 0.99 acre of wetland and 209 linear feet (If) (temporary) of unnamed stream to construct and
complete the project Mecklenburg County, as described in your application received by the Division of Water
Quality (DWQ) on January 4, 2012. After reviewing your application, we have determined that this project is
covered by Water Quality General Certification Number 3819, which can be viewed on our web site at
http: // portal .ncdenr.org /web /wq /swp /ws /401. The General Certification allows you to use Nationwide Permit
Number 12 once it is issued to you by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. Please note that you should get any
other federal, state or local permits before proceeding with your project, including those required by (but not
limited to) Sediment and Erosion Control, Non- Discharge, and Water Supply Watershed regulations.
The above noted Certification will expire when the associated 404 permit expires unless otherwise
specified in the General Certification. This approval is only valid for the purpose and design that you described
in your application. If you change your project, you must notify us in writing, and you may be required to send
us a new application for a new certification. If the property is sold, the new owner must be given a copy of the
Certification and approval letter; and is thereby responsible for complying with all conditions.
In addition to the requirements of the certification, you must also comply with the following conditions:
1. The Mooresville Regional Office shall be notified in writing once construction at the approved impact areas
has commenced.
2. All wetlands, streams, surface waters, and riparian buffers located on the project site where impacts are not
allowed shall be clearly marked (example- orange fabric fencing) prior to any land disturbing activities.
3. No riprap, nor culverts are proposed for this project. Immediately upon completion of the installation, water
flow shall be returned to its natural course. Existing stream dimensions (including the cross section
dimensions, pattern, and longitudinal profile) must be maintained.
Mooresville Regional Office One
Location: 610 East Center Avenue, suite 301, Mooresville, NC 28115 NoAhCarolina
Phone:
Internet: tp:lltportal ncdenr.org /we5 wg0�401 Customer Service: 1-877-623-6748 '%17rytutu//L"/
An Equal Opp ortunitylAffirmative Action Employer — 50% Recycled110% Post Consumer Paper `/ y�` L [L�

4. Use of native vegetation and other soft stream bank stabilization techniques must be used where practicable
instead of riprap or other bank hardening methods. If riprap is necessary, it shall not be placed in the
streambed, unless approved by DWQ.
5. No waste, spoil, solids, or fill of any kind shall occur in wetlands, waters, or riparian areas beyond the
footprint of the impacts depicted in the Preconstruction Notification application. All construction activities
associated with this project shall meet, and/or exceed, those requirements specified in the most recent
version of the North Carolina Sediment and Erosion Control Manual and shall be conducted so that no
violations of state water quality standards, statutes, or rules occur.
6. Sediment and erosion control measures shall not be placed in wetlands or waters to the maximum extent
practicable. If placement of sediment and erosion control devices in wetlands and waters is unavoidable,
they shall be removed and the natural grade restored within two months of the date the Division of Land
Resources has released the project.
7. Upon completion of the project, the applicant shall complete and return the enclosed "Certificate of
Completion" form to the 401 /Wetlands Unit of the NC DWQ
8. Continuing Compliance. The applicant (Piedmont Natural Gas) shall conduct all activities in a manner so as
not to contravene any state water quality standard (including any requirements for compliance with section
303(d) of the Clean Water Act) and any other appropriate requirements of state and federal law. If DWQ
determines that such standards or laws are not being met (including the failure to sustain a designated or
achieved use) or that state or federal law is being violated, or that further conditions are necessary to assure
compliance, DWQ may reevaluate and modify this certification to include conditions appropriate to assure
compliance with such standards and requirements in accordance with 15 A NCAC 2H.0507(d). Before
codifying the certification, DWQ shall notify the applicant and the US Army Corps of Engineers, provide public
notice in accordance with 15A NCAC 2H.0503, and provide opportunity for public hearing in accordance with
15A NCAC 2H.0504. Any new or revised conditions shall be provided to the applicant in writing, shall be
provided to the United States Army Corps of Engineers for reference in any permit issued pursuant to Section
404 of the Clean Water Act, and shall also become conditions of the 404 Permit for the project.
If you do not accept any of the conditions of this certification, you may ask for an adjudicatory hearing.
You must act within 60 days of the date that you receive this letter. To ask for a hearing, send a written
petition that conforms to Chapter 150B of the North Carolina General Statutes to the Office of Administrative
Hearings, 6714 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, N.C. 27699 -6714. This certification and its conditions are final
and binding unless you ask for a hearing.
This letter completes the review of DWQ under Section 401 of the Clean Water Act. if you have any
questions, please telephone Mr. Alan Johnson in the Mooresville Regional Office at 704 - 663 -1699 or Ms. Karen
Higgins in the Central Office in Raleigh 919- 807 -6360.
Sincerely,
for Charles Wakild, P.E.
Attachments
cc: Army Corps of Engineers, Asheville
Karen Higgins, Wetlands Unit
Crystal Fox, S & ME

APPENDIX II:
WETLAND AND STREAM IMPACT TABLES

Impact Tables
PNG Huntersville Strengthening Project
WETLAND IMPACT TABLE
Project No. 1357 -11 -005
December 2011
Wetland
ID
Sheet No.
Classification
Impacts
Crossing T yp e*
Vegetative Type
Relation to
Waterbody
Temporary �
Conversion
sf
ac
sf
ac
A
3 of 12
Emergent
Riparian
965
0.022
0
0.000
Conventional
B
4 of 12
Emergent
Riparian
116
0.003
0
0.000
Conventional
C
8 of 12
Forested
Riparian
2,693
0.062
2,044
0.047
Trenchless
D
9 of 12
Forested
Riparian
80
0.002
67
0.002
Conventional
E
10 fo 12
Emergent/Forested
Riparian
303
0.007
271
0.006
Conventional
F
10 of 12
Emergent/Forested
Riparian
177
0.004
168
0.004
Conventional
Totals:
4,334
0.099
2,550
0.059
* Trenchless Crossings include boring or use of horizontal directional drill (HDD) that will not impact the wetland.
STREAM IMPACT TABLE
Stream ID
Sheet No.
Classification
Perpendicular
Crossing?
Temporary Impact
Crossing Type*
If
sf
S1
5 of 12
Perennial RPW
Yes
40
0
Trenchless
S2
6 of 12
Perennial RPW
No
74
1413
Trenchless
S3
7 of 12
Perennial RPW
No
95
829
Trenchless
S4
11 of 12
Perennial RPW
N/A
0
0
Avoided
Totals:
209
2242
* Trenchless Crossings include boring or use of horizontal directional drill (HDD) that will not impact the stream.

APPENDIX III:
SITE PHOTOGRAPHS

1 Origin of pipeline project — facing west.
View of the project corridor passing through field,
facing west.
5 View of project corridor near historic mill site, facing
southeast.
2 Terminus of pipeline project, facing northwest.
L� E
4 View of the project corridor adjoining the sewerline,
facing southeast.
6 View of mill ruins near project corridor, facing
southwest.
SITE PHOTOGRAPHS
PNG Huntersville Strengthening Project
Mecklenburg County, NC
No.: 1357 -11 -005 Photo Page 1 of 2

7 Stream 1 — Upstream
9 Wetland 4 — North
11 Stream 5 — Downstream
10 Stream 4 — McDowell Creek upstream; note high
sediment load in foreground
.
" I X44 a
a r
-
r j
A
t !
ec
12 Wetland 6 — North
SITE PHOTOGRAPHS
PNG Huntersville Strengthening Project
Mecklenburg County, NC
No.: 1357 -11 -005 Photo Page 2 of 2

APPENDIX IV:
JURISDICTIONAL WATERS OF THE U.S. IMPACT
PLAN DRAWINGS (SHEETS 1 -12)

ALvrl
00
« --h
CD (D CD
N
p� N
N
O�
Q
D 0 +
(A m O
X O
ell r
z _
mzm
C) Z
Now
rn _
n C r
r -
-o
z m v I
ca 0
c0z� mow,
c�
z v o �o r
� —z
n 3 D 5 D
oz -u r o
D D
- D
Darn
zrrM
0C) ztn -
M D O °r Z
�� '�r_
D Z = L,) m ° ' `� (n
X m rn DC° Ln
o c �r- o M
zom c
z ° C7
D
Pr
G) O O
(D m + fTl
*
CLI)� O
mZ� O
ri
POOL` MVd G7 ¢
rp
allvd 40
�? -�- -
tt
ED
CE
z�
�3
Q 0

0
D M
Z
co
0 -100 0 m0 -1 Co�cn -u � NC- CA �Dlv 0C)- z
�-p�, DI zmSD 00' r R, C' mN' �� 0
cum C <rmN° C D� ��� o SOD
�� v_►, r pm��� oz r= m � mgm ��_ �zr- �
rn 3 �I �>�pr �� ° o N ZEN DzK w °p
� 3 rl zOzm* N0 U) O Om C) --j
Oo> m�D
< n
C C D z' Z Z
{ _ zl Demo m* ED z m F— �z0
OOCOD pN o� D D D C0�0 m pnN m m
=4 Nm =:u0 mS Z � :{l 0� �N m m �
0
CD L4 m z 0 SZ n m Z CO NN Nr
.�� N I �n��o -i m N N ZN ZZ = x D
r DO I omz � =o -< °m 0� Z0 mo
m-U Sm 0 N �0 �_ pz w
�Z I• N�mCm m m Z m o D �..
cn _ m C- m Z o D
co �� m �v 111 Zompz� m� o N= mm r�� En
�•4� <S z- z D- z0 m mm
p =ONO < r�v� C�ZND op �_ D = NN �� z= N �
0 7w m ��'�\ 'n0� �flo N ° o C7� p� o x D m
N
CD cDl� �,mizD o� po D mD m� mz X
0) \ I 0 -r 0 z c,., r 00 mN ° N
p p �� �NnZC z -i Z m— � �z CD
G7 C Z Z
o X o s�N�< D O = D m� N ZD 0
m N p0 mr I C)
m fmTl n oO D CO = CA N N N N
m m M --< o m� / r
C ` `,,111111111111 / m `� m Z
Cl)
00 z
C7 D ///11/11111`11 m
D N
Z r D N r
0 C-) Z O 41 z
m
2N0
DZ rm
;u m
0 c
r (n
Z
D i
i
0 i
0 O�
O
a
m ♦ 0C
In N / 7C
N m� /
0)
0 0 =m
m
x
V I
W
O n
= O D
m r
m
N O
O
N O
0
m m
D rn = D 2001
O m
Z
O � o
OD
N
0)
N
O
r-
' D ° � Z ° � ° -u �aFl-)ODO�-u :�E�D
p D D m =Dmom C-Ti= CaDCO=
B r K r m���G)D� mm�Xo-
�90, m m m m comocr-o =Czz�N° -emu
D
00 =OWOZMCpm -UCDj�m�
M I O O O Z
mr �,� I I zonWmz��o�Z -<-
I I �° —i' o-
In mZ �� 9�F Dmm0p�z�OZz -u - TjMmi)
m�M mD I I I I zU) mmz= W pNS ��
=D `Op mo I I yotcXj�w>M> pmmoS
m z o I I I I r- m D° Z D n
O� m l I I I I "z > °Wm�mW�omO ==
I zoIm�oz =�«zm CD
II I I mzmmmz�Dm° o�po
I X��rD AND m Co
NDmFri mm�DDOZm
I I I �U) >°00c0z IT' w0 -Ti 0
I
N� I �- Nu0 c00m ° =��
m I I i D°ooT'mZZ =mCD
0cK: -iM U)=�K�m�in
I I I o N zS �
=moo �Ln�mmzmr-
I I I ZNDz mriD° >
i I I I I o � NCO
m

it. -. - r7.... EASEMENT /TEMPORARY IMPACT LIMIT
PERMANENT CONVERSION LIMIT
z.
o to ..WOODED .
m .... r_._._._. r_I
o S'...... PROPOSED GAS LINE
z a w . . .7:.:
. ._
- - EASEMENT /TEMPORARY IMPACT LIMIT
J - - - - - -- TEMPORARY WORK SPACE
IMPACT AREA DETAIL
NOT TO SCALE
.:..
01
6 P . 6.05
PS
W6.04
S / �
VP S/ W6.0`§ % "
JA / • .i
6.02
W6.13
08
W6.12
W6.11
/ V
� W
v�
GAS _` GAS
GILEAD VILLAGE
HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION INC.
DB. 23569, PG. 840
PART OF COS
MB. 43, PG. 757, 759
PIN: 015- 041 -01
P- 93 -ME -01
MECKLENBURG COUNTY
DB. 14623, PG. 117
y C/A & GREENWAY
MB. 28, PG. 544 & 50 -236
PIN: 015-391-98
PROPOSED 40 EASEMENT - -
-yG S PROPOSED GAS GAS GAS
- -_ GAS
PROPOSED 15'
TEMPORARY WORK SPACE
30' EXISTING CMUD SEWER s�
- - R/W
WETLANDS A IMPACT
TEMPORARY IMPACT AREA
965 SQ FT
0.022 AC
PERMANENT CONVERSION
0 SQ FT
0 AC
-O / W6.01
' / / WETLANDS "A„ CAII / / /�'''
� I, DARYL W. LONG, CERTIFY THAT A S O . "FES S %O " "" ��
\ \ \ SURVEY WAS MADE UNDER MY .;Q-
SUPERVISION by ��
SHOWN H HEREON REFLECTSHTHEETLANDS = * Q EAL
c ( DELINEATION EVIDENCE PROVIDED BY S &
� ME ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES IN JULY OF I- -491 ��'
\ � Q� 2011. •��'' O9 ti� SURV �y� �O ```�•
L 12116hl
DARYL W. LONG PLS E-4918
Professional 18335 Old Statesville Road
Property Suite A
Pro
i WC1 P Y Cornelius, N.C. 28031
Surveyors, Inc. 704 - 765 -5134 Phone /Fax
DRAWN BY: DWL SURVEY BY: DWL JOB NO. 042611 -01
NOTES:
1. ALL DISTANCES SHOWN ARE HORIZONTAL GROUND
DISTANCES AND ARE IN FEET UNLESS OTHERWISE
NOTED.
2. THIS MAP DOES NOT CONFORM TO GS 47 -30, AS
AMENDED. IT IS NOT INTENDED FOR RECORDATION.
3. THE SOLE PURPOSE OF THIS PLAT IS TO SHOW
JURISDICTIONAL BOUNDARIES AS DELINEATED BY S &ME,
INC.
4. BASIS OF BEARING IS NORTH CAROLINA STATE
PLANE COORDINATE SYSTEM (NAD 83 /NSRS2007)
5. THE DISTURBANCE CORRIDOR IS NOT TO EXCEED 40'
IN WIDTH WITHIN THE JURISDICTIONAL BOUNDARIES,
EXCEPT WHERE NOTED.
JURISDICTIONAL WATERS OF THE U.S.
AND IMPACT PLAN OF
PIEDMONT NATURAL GAS LINE
MECKLENBURG COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
"THIS CERTIFIES THAT THIS COPY OF THIS PLAT
ACCURATELY DEPICTS THE BOUNDARY OF THE
JURISDICTION OF SECTION 404 OF THE CLEAN
WATER ACTIN THE AREAS IMPACTED BY THE
PRESENT PROPOSED ACTIVITY, AS DETERMINED BY
THE UNDERSIGNED ON THIS DATE. OTHER AREAS
OF JURISDICTION MAY BE PRESENT ON THE SITE
BUT HAVE NOT BEEN DELINEATED. UNLESS THERE
IS A CHANGE IN LAW OR OUR PUBLISHED
REGULATIONS, THIS DETERMINATION OF SECTION
404 JURISDICTION MAY BE RELIED UPON FOR A
PERIOD NOT TO EXCEED FIVE YEARS FROM THIS
DATE. THIS DETERMINATION WAS MADE UTILIZING
THE 1987 CORPS OF ENGINEERS WETLANDS
DELINEATION MANUAL."
NAME:
TITLE:
DATE:
AID:
SCALE: 1 " = 30'
iiii
30 15 0 30
DWG FILE: W3 SHEET: 3 OF 12 DATE: 12/16/2011
WETLAND "A" FLAG TABLE
P �yu, 'h hra,r�e� pia Vitt t
�J
LENGTH BEARING
�
EASTING
W6.01
a°
N 607897.96
E 1433464.25
14.51'
NO2 °43'30 "E
N 607912.46
E 1433464.94
18.84'
"W6.02
N39 °39'05 E
W6.03
N 607926.97
E 1433476.96
t`
M
SITE
¢a
"
00
E 1433487.26
�l
N32 °21'04 "E
W6.05
N 607963.95
E 1433502.18
26.92'
N37 °51'34 "E
W6.06
N 607985.21
E 1433518.70
7.66'
S88 °1 4'06 "E
w
N 607984.97
E 1433526.36
32.82'
N42 °31'44 "E
W6.08
N 608009.15
C
VICINITY MAP
N30 °54'45 "E
Z
NOT TO SCALE
E 1433558.86
WETLAND "A" FLAG TABLE
FLAG
LENGTH BEARING
NORTHING
EASTING
W6.01
N 607897.96
E 1433464.25
14.51'
NO2 °43'30 "E
N 607912.46
E 1433464.94
18.84'
"W6.02
N39 °39'05 E
W6.03
N 607926.97
E 1433476.96
16.92'
N37 °29'30 "E
W6.04
N 607940.40
E 1433487.26
27 88'
N32 °21'04 "E
W6.05
N 607963.95
E 1433502.18
26.92'
N37 °51'34 "E
W6.06
N 607985.21
E 1433518.70
7.66'
S88 °1 4'06 "E
W6.07
N 607984.97
E 1433526.36
32.82'
N42 °31'44 "E
W6.08
N 608009.15
E 1433548.54
20.08'
N30 °54'45 "E
W6.09
N 608026.38
E 1433558.86
46.40'
N47 °301 6 "E
W6.10
N 608057.73
E 1433593.07
12.76
N44 °0018 E
W6.11
N 608075.71
E 1433610.44
12.76'
N44 °00'1 8 "E
W6.12
N 608085.41
E 1433602.15
42.97'
S47 °3038 "W
W6.13
N 608056.38
E 1433570.46
39.55
S47 °13 24 W
W6.14
N 608029.52
E 1433541.43
36.40'
S38 °43'43 "W
W6.15
N 608001.13
E 1433518.66
15.92'
S00 °09'04 "E
W6.06
N 607985.21
E 1433518.70
LEGEND
W1.001
CPS1.001
S1.001
GAS
-G G -
TEMPORARY IMPACT AREA
PERMANENT CONVERSION AREA
WETLAND AREA
WETLAND DELINEATION FLAG
COMPUTED POINT
STREAM DELINEATION FLAG
WETLAND STREAM BOUNDARY
EXISTING WOODS LINE
PROPOSED GAS LINE
EXISTING GAS LINE
PROPOSED EASEMENT
IMPACT LIMIT
PROPERTY LINE
TEMPORARY WORK SPACE
SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE
SANITARY SEWER LINE

WETLAND "B" AREA
— GAS WITHIN PNG EAST.
GAS --, GASTO BE DISTURBED
---- - GAS
PROPOSED 40
EASEMENT
GAS GAPROPOSED GAS LINE
_ - GAS GAS GAS —
PROPOSED — -- — _ GA S
P
— ED 15 RARRK
_ TEMP
O Y WO - ---��_
— — — W5.01 - � SPACE
30' EXISTING CMUD SEWER
— iY -Y-Y--*) . rY-yl WOODED R
WETLANDS B IMPACT
O
P- 93
1116 SQ FT
-ME -02 M
PERMANENT CONVERSION
MECKLENBURG COUNTY q�q
WETLANDS "B"
DB. 14093, PG. 883 z
5.02
PIN: 015- 091 -07
NW
86.01'
40'
TEMPORARY IMPACT F
N 607978.98
E 1434163.63
WETLAND "B" AREA
— GAS WITHIN PNG EAST.
GAS --, GASTO BE DISTURBED
---- - GAS
PROPOSED 40
EASEMENT
GAS GAPROPOSED GAS LINE
_ - GAS GAS GAS —
PROPOSED — -- — _ GA S
P
— ED 15 RARRK
_ TEMP
O Y WO - ---��_
— — — W5.01 - � SPACE
30' EXISTING CMUD SEWER
— iY -Y-Y--*) . rY-yl WOODED R
WETLANDS B IMPACT
TEMPORARY IMPACT AREA
1116 SQ FT
10.003 AC
PERMANENT CONVERSION
10 SO FT
10 AC
WETLAND "B" FLAG TABLE
FLAG
LENGTH
BEARING
I NORTHING
EASTING
W5.01
N 607899.93
E 1434197.54
86.01'
S23 °13'05 "E
W5.02
N 607978.98
E 1434163.63
Professional 18335 Old Statesville Road
Property Suite A
Pro
i WC1 P Y Cornelius, N.C. 28031
Surveyors, Inc. 704 - 765 -5134 Phone /Fax
DRAWN BY: DWL I SURVEY BY: DWL I JOB NO. 042611 -01
`` 011111111// "�/
CAR ''%
�N o
`��� pe. F E S S %� :�Zy�i'i
I, DARYL W. LONG, CERTIFY THAT A SURVEY WAS �L•• '9 i
MADE UNDER MY SUPERVISION AND THAT THE JQ r-!491 L
WETLANDS SHOWN HEREON REFLECTS THE
DELINEATION EVIDENCE PROVIDED BY S & ME /2 I I
ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES IN JULY OFF 2011 i •9
I LZI 16 /1 DARYL W. LONG PLS L-4918 �j '9
010111111111111 %
JURISDICTIONAL WATERS OF
AND IMPACT PLAT! OF
PIEDMONT NATURAL GAS
ECKLENBURG COUNTY, NORTH
"THIS CERTIFIES THAT THIS COPY OF THIS PLAT
ACCURATELY DEPICTS THE BOUNDARY OF THE
JURISDICTION OF SECTION 404 OF THE CLEAN
WATER ACTIN THE AREAS IMPACTED BY THE
PRESENT PROPOSED ACTIVITY, AS DETERMINED BY
THE UNDERSIGNED ON THIS DATE. OTHER AREAS
OF JURISDICTION MAY BE PRESENT ON THE SITE
BUT HAVE NOT BEEN DELINEATED. UNLESS THERE
IS A CHANGE IN LAW OR OUR PUBLISHED
REGULATIONS, THIS DETERMINATION OF SECTION
404 JURISDICTION MAY BE RELIED UPON FOR A
PERIOD NOT TO EXCEED FIVE YEARS FROM THIS
DATE. THIS DETERMINATION WAS MADE UTILIZING
THE 1987 CORPS OF ENGINEERS WETLANDS
DELINEATION MANUAL."
NAME: ------- - - - - --
TITLE: ------- - - - - --
DATE: ------- - - - - --
AID:
THE U• S• SCALE: 1 "= 30'
iiii
LINE 30 15 0 30
CAROLINA DWG FILE: W4 SHEET: 4 OF 12 DATE: 12/16/2011
�yu, � 'h hra,r�e� p,a Viti t
4° �J
td.n�GMa F17.
:✓w�xnq cm:.r �
¢a
H
SITE A
�l
amp
A
VICINITY MAP
NOT TO SCALE
i[. -. - - .. EASEMENT /TEMPORARY IMPACT LIMIT
} '.'.'.'o.'.'.'.
.....
¢ ..- PERMANENT CONVERSION LIMIT
0 ... to .WOODED'.
m ­1 r. .........
o 5..........
PROPOSED GAS LINE
z... <.....:. ..
EASEMENT /TEMPORARY IMPACT LIMIT
TEMPORARY WORK SPACE
IMPACT AREA DETAIL
NOT TO SCALE
NOTES:
1. ALL DISTANCES SHOWN ARE HORIZONTAL GROUND
DISTANCES AND ARE IN FEET UNLESS OTHERWISE
NOTED.
2. THIS MAP DOES NOT CONFORM TO GS 47 -30, AS
AMENDED. IT IS NOT INTENDED FOR RECORDATION.
3. THE SOLE PURPOSE OF THIS PLAT IS TO SHOW
JURISDICTIONAL BOUNDARIES AS DELINEATED BY S &ME,
INC.
4. BASIS OF BEARING IS NORTH CAROLINA STATE
PLANE COORDINATE SYSTEM (NAD 83 /NSRS2007)
5. THE DISTURBANCE CORRIDOR IS NOT TO EXCEED 40'
IN WIDTH WITHIN THE JURISDICTIONAL BOUNDARIES,
EXCEPT WHERE NOTED.
LEGEND
TEMPORARY IMPACT AREA
PERMANENT CONVERSION AREA
WETLAND AREA
rscw1pi-S00100101 WETLAND DELINEATION FLAG
01 COMPUTED POINT
STREAM DELINEATION FLAG
WETLAND STREAM BOUNDARY
EXISTING WOODS LINE
GAS PROPOSED GAS LINE
— - - — - - — PROPOSED EASEMENT
- - - - - - - - - - IMPACT LIMIT
PROPERTY LINE
TEMPORARY WORK SPACE
QS SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE
SANITARY SEWER LINE

I
I
TEMPORARY WORK SPACE I
H
PROPOSED 40' EASEMENT
I' STREAM AREA
WITHIN PNG EAST. ,d
TO BE DISTURBED
I
GAS GA PROPOSED GAS LINE
' GAS GA
I,---- __ -_____
� I
LD '
P- 93 -ME -02
MECKLENBURG COUNTY
DB. 14093, PG. 883
Q �
PIN: 015-091-07
L7
NOTES:
1. ALL DISTANCES SHOWN ARE HORIZONTAL GROUND
DISTANCES AND ARE IN FEET UNLESS OTHERWISE
NOTED.
2. THIS MAP DOES NOT CONFORM TO GS 47 -30, AS
AMENDED. IT IS NOT INTENDED FOR RECORDATION.
3. THE SOLE PURPOSE OF THIS PLAT IS TO SHOW
JURISDICTIONAL BOUNDARIES AS DELINEATED BY S &ME,
INC.
4. BASIS OF BEARING IS NORTH CAROLINA STATE
PLANE COORDINATE SYSTEM (NAD 83 /NSRS2007)
5. THE DISTURBANCE CORRIDOR IS NOT TO EXCEED 40'
IN WIDTH WITHIN THE JURISDICTIONAL BOUNDARIES,
EXCEPT WHERE NOTED.
Professional 18335 Old Statesville Road
5 Property Suite A
Pro
P Y Cornelius, N.C. 28031
Surveyors, Inc. 704- 765 -5134 Phone /Fax
DRAWN BY: DWL I SURVEY BY: DWL IJOB NO. 042611 -01
!.Roil
02
.03
FLAG
,
N
0
N
5.04
STREAM "1"
�4
eA
GAS
GAS
GAS
I, DARYL W. LONG, CERTIFY THAT A SURVEY WAS �` =O�' O��SS /��L
MADE UNDER MY SUPERVISION AND THAT THE �Q SAL THE
WETLANDS DELINEATION HOWN
VIDENCE HEREON BYS S & ME
ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES IN JULY OF 2 11. '
-Ir' L -4918 ��'
DAR W. LONG PIL �Z ...... II /��'9,Qy UR•'�O�``��
" 10 ��/ 11111 1111 \ \`\
JURISDICTIONAL WATERS OF THE U.S.
AND IMPACT PLAN OF
PIEDMONT NATURAL GAS LINE
MECKLENBURG COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
15
�Pe
H
P4 ,w , —
H.P"
w
STREAM "1" FLAG TABLE
FLAG
,
P- 93 -ME -03
0
Ekmemvy
PAUL BOCKER
ELSIE D. BOCKER
Q
SITE
DB. 9296, PG. 262
S5.02
N 607988.82
PIN: 015- 091 -05�V�
43.35'
S02'1 3'37 "W
S5.03
N 607945.50
E 1435021.85
68.95'
S05 27'06"E
S5.04
N 607876.86
E 1435028.40
--- -- - -__
VICINITY MAP"
Z
NOT TO SCALE
GAS
GAS
GAS
I, DARYL W. LONG, CERTIFY THAT A SURVEY WAS �` =O�' O��SS /��L
MADE UNDER MY SUPERVISION AND THAT THE �Q SAL THE
WETLANDS DELINEATION HOWN
VIDENCE HEREON BYS S & ME
ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES IN JULY OF 2 11. '
-Ir' L -4918 ��'
DAR W. LONG PIL �Z ...... II /��'9,Qy UR•'�O�``��
" 10 ��/ 11111 1111 \ \`\
JURISDICTIONAL WATERS OF THE U.S.
AND IMPACT PLAN OF
PIEDMONT NATURAL GAS LINE
MECKLENBURG COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
15
�Pe
H
P4 ,w , —
H.P"
w
STREAM "1" FLAG TABLE
FLAG
LENGTH
BEARING
NORTHING
EASTING
S5.01
N 608019.53
E 1435021.38
30.79'
SO4'00'47 "E
S5.02
N 607988.82
E 1435023.54
43.35'
S02'1 3'37 "W
S5.03
N 607945.50
E 1435021.85
68.95'
S05 27'06"E
S5.04
N 607876.86
E 1435028.40
STREAM 1
AREA: 282 SQ FT / 0.006 ACRE
LINEAR FEET: 40'
*THIS AREA WILL BE DIRECTIONALLY BORED TO
MINIMIZE IMPACTS
"THIS CERTIFIES THAT THIS COPY OF THIS PLAT
ACCURATELY DEPICTS THE BOUNDARY OF THE
JURISDICTION OF SECTION 404 OF THE CLEAN
WATER ACTIN THE AREAS IMPACTED BY THE
PRESENT PROPOSED ACTIVITY, AS DETERMINED BY
THE UNDERSIGNED ON THIS DATE. OTHER AREAS
OF JURISDICTION MAY BE PRESENT ON THE SITE
BUT HAVE NOT BEEN DELINEATED. UNLESS THERE
IS A CHANGE IN LAW OR OUR PUBLISHED
REGULATIONS, THIS DETERMINATION OF SECTION
404 JURISDICTION MAY BE RELIED UPON FOR A
PERIOD NOT TO EXCEED FIVE YEARS FROM THIS
DATE. THIS DETERMINATION WAS MADE UTILIZING
THE 1987 CORPS OF ENGINEERS WETLANDS
DELINEATION MANUAL."
NAME:
TI TLE:
DATE:
AID:
SCALE: 1" = 30'
iiii
30 15 0 30
DWG FILE: W5 SHEET: 5 OF 12 DATE: 12/16/2011
LEGEND
W1.001
CPS1.001
S1.001
GAS
AREA TO BE DISTURBED
TEMPORARY IMPACT AREA
PERMANENT CONVERSION AREA
WETLAND AREA
WETLAND DELINEATION FLAG
COMPUTED POINT
STREAM DELINEATION FLAG
WETLAND STREAM BOUNDARY
EXISTING WOODS LINE
PROPOSED GAS LINE
PROPOSED EASEMENT
IMPACT LIMIT
IMPACT LIMIT
PROPERTY LINE
TEMPORARY WORK SPACE
SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE
SANITARY SEWER LINE

I
AS GAS — GAS
STREAM 2 AREA
WITHIN PNG EAST.
TO BE DISTURBED
A
NOTES:
1. ALL DISTANCES SHOWN ARE HORIZONTAL GROUND
DISTANCES AND ARE IN FEET UNLESS OTHERWISE
NOTED.
2. THIS MAP DOES NOT CONFORM TO GS 47 -30, AS
AMENDED. IT IS NOT INTENDED FOR RECORDATION.
3. THE SOLE PURPOSE OF THIS PLAT IS TO SHOW
JURISDICTIONAL BOUNDARIES AS DELINEATED BY S &ME,
INC.
4. BASIS OF BEARING IS NORTH CAROLINA STATE
PLANE COORDINATE SYSTEM (NAD 83 /NSRS2007)
5. THE DISTURBANCE CORRIDOR IS NOT TO EXCEED 40'
IN WIDTH WITHIN THE JURISDICTIONAL BOUNDARIES,
EXCEPT WHERE NOTED.
Professional 183aa Old Statesville Road
Property Suite A
Pro
i WE P Y Cornelius, N.C. 28031
Surveyors, Inc. 704 - 765 -5134 Phone /Fax
DRAWN BY: DWL SURVEY BY: DWL JOB NO. 042611 -01
SS
P- 93 -ME -06
JON S PORTER
GINGER PORTER
DB. 1,5835, PG. 706
LOT 3A
M� . 25, PG. 593
PIN. \ 15- 091 -13
sP
I
STREAM "2/����
�S4.01 G�0
/ \,
P- 93 -ME -07
MECKLENBURG COUNTY
DB. 12386, PG. 117
PART OF LOT 1
MB. 3, PG. 466
PIN: 015-091-04
PROPOSED 40' EASEMENT — -- — -- — - -
PROPOSED GAS LINE GAS GAS
rAS �� G S GAS GAS
- -_ GAS__ -_ _ --T', ----------- - - - - -- ' -�
PROPOSED 15' TEMPORARY WORK SPACE r
� s-S-
— S-S--_
TORRENCE CREEK
KATIE CATHERINE GRIER (HEIRS)
C/O MYRTLE GRIER
DB. 930, PG. 209
PIN: 015- 081 -03
JURISDICTIONAL WATERS OF THE U.S.
AND IMPACT PLAN OF
PIEDMONT NATURAL GAS LINE
MECKLENBURG COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
30' EXISTING CMUD SEWER R/W
"THIS CERTIFIES THAT THIS COPY OF THIS PLAT
ACCURATELY DEPICTS THE BOUNDARY OF THE
JURISDICTION OF SECTION 404 OF THE CLEAN WATER
ACTIN THE AREAS IMPACTED BY THE PRESENT
PROPOSED ACTIVITY, AS DETERMINED BY THE
UNDERSIGNED ON THIS DATE. OTHER AREAS OF
JURISDICTION MAY BE PRESENT ON THE SITE BUT HAVE
NOT BEEN DELINEATED. UNLESS THERE IS A CHANGE IN
LAW OR OUR PUBLISHED REGULATIONS, THIS
DETERMINATION OF SECTION 404 JURISDICTION MAY BE
RELIED UPON FOR A PERIOD NOT TO EXCEED FIVE YEARS
FROM THIS DATE. THIS DETERMINATION WAS MADE
UTILIZING THE 1987 CORPS OF ENGINEERS WETLANDS
DELINEATION MANUAL."
NAME:
TI TLE:
DATE:
AID:
SCALE: 1" = 30'
iiii
30 15 0 30
DWG FILE: W6 SHEET: 6 OF 12 DATE: 12/16/2011
STREAM "2" FLAG TABLE
FLAG
LENGTH
Elrmeiwy
NORTHING
EASTING
0
�pd
N 608032.65
E 1435999.21
PGM
S52'39' 13 "W
S4.02
N 607992.88
E 1435913.53
42.49'
S52'10'06 "W
S4.03
R[N 'S�Yr
E 1435913.53
."
75 17'
a
p
x'
E 1435853.32
56.58'
"
G
VICINITY MAP
Z
NOT TO SCALE
PROPOSED 40' EASEMENT — -- — -- — - -
PROPOSED GAS LINE GAS GAS
rAS �� G S GAS GAS
- -_ GAS__ -_ _ --T', ----------- - - - - -- ' -�
PROPOSED 15' TEMPORARY WORK SPACE r
� s-S-
— S-S--_
TORRENCE CREEK
KATIE CATHERINE GRIER (HEIRS)
C/O MYRTLE GRIER
DB. 930, PG. 209
PIN: 015- 081 -03
JURISDICTIONAL WATERS OF THE U.S.
AND IMPACT PLAN OF
PIEDMONT NATURAL GAS LINE
MECKLENBURG COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
30' EXISTING CMUD SEWER R/W
"THIS CERTIFIES THAT THIS COPY OF THIS PLAT
ACCURATELY DEPICTS THE BOUNDARY OF THE
JURISDICTION OF SECTION 404 OF THE CLEAN WATER
ACTIN THE AREAS IMPACTED BY THE PRESENT
PROPOSED ACTIVITY, AS DETERMINED BY THE
UNDERSIGNED ON THIS DATE. OTHER AREAS OF
JURISDICTION MAY BE PRESENT ON THE SITE BUT HAVE
NOT BEEN DELINEATED. UNLESS THERE IS A CHANGE IN
LAW OR OUR PUBLISHED REGULATIONS, THIS
DETERMINATION OF SECTION 404 JURISDICTION MAY BE
RELIED UPON FOR A PERIOD NOT TO EXCEED FIVE YEARS
FROM THIS DATE. THIS DETERMINATION WAS MADE
UTILIZING THE 1987 CORPS OF ENGINEERS WETLANDS
DELINEATION MANUAL."
NAME:
TI TLE:
DATE:
AID:
SCALE: 1" = 30'
iiii
30 15 0 30
DWG FILE: W6 SHEET: 6 OF 12 DATE: 12/16/2011
STREAM "2" FLAG TABLE
FLAG
LENGTH
BEARING
NORTHING
EASTING
S4.01
N 608032.65
E 1435999.21
56
65. '
S52'39' 13 "W
S4.02
N 607992.88
E 1435913.53
42.49'
S52'10'06 "W
S4.03
N 607966.82
E 1435913.53
."
75 17'
S53'13'04 W
S4.04
N 607921.81
E 1435853.32
56.58'
S53'10'06 "W
S4.05
N 607887.89
E 1435808.04
STREAM 2
AREA: 1,413 SQ FT / 0.032 ACRE
LINEAR FEET: 74'
*THIS AREA WILL BE DIRECTIONALLY BORED TO
MINIMIZE IMPACTS
``,11111111118111
�N CA R�
I, DARYL W. LONG, CERTIFY THAT A SURVEY WAS O tip• y
MADE UNDER MY SUPERVISION AND THAT THE
WETLANDS SHOWN HEREON REFLECTS THE
DELINEATION EVIDENCE PROVIDED BY S & ME * 12 I I
ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES IN JULY OF 2 -
— — / ; <9 114918 '..
DAR L W. LONG LEGEND PLS L -491 /'� ....... �1�0�Q
AREA TO BE DISTURBED
TEMPORARY IMPACT AREA
PERMANENT CONVERSION AREA
WETLAND AREA
W1.001 WETLAND DELINEATION FLAG
CPS1.001 COMPUTED POINT
S1.001 STREAM DELINEATION FLAG
WETLAND STREAM BOUNDARY
EXISTING WOODS LINE
GAS PROPOSED GAS LINE
— - - — - - — PROPOSED EASEMENT
- - - - - - - - - - IMPACT LIMIT
PROPERTY LINE
TEMPORARY WORK SPACE
QS SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE
SANITARY SEWER LINE

S \ JAMES J. STASKY
AUDREY A. STASKY
\ Gq f DB. 17232, PG. 559
\ LOT 2 EXISTING °o
` \. \ C MB. 36, PG. 940 WOOD BUILDING
L
STREAM 3 AREA
\`% PIN: 015 -351 -02 - 00
\ Z
\ WITHIN PNG EAST. `.
TO BE DISTURBED 19
53.09
\ S3. z
S
.02 � S3
OpO
S3. 10\ .
STREAM „3„ OSF FgSFM\
\ \ c F/V
\ \ s p�Op
\ OS
\ F� 7S.
30
F�ISTIN
c
\ \ \ ci,7�O S
�� DEPICTS "THIS CERTIFIES THAT THIS COPY OF THIS PLAT FwFR CF
\ \ JURISD CTION OF SECTION 404 OF THE OF
CLEAN WATER
ACTIN THE AREAS IMPACTED BY THE PRESENT
S 1 PROPOSED ACTIVITY, AS DETERMINED BY THE
UNDERSIGNED ON THIS DATE. OTHER AREAS OF
JURISDICTION MAY BE PRESENT ON THE SITE BUT HAVE NOTES:
NOT BEEN DELINEATED. UNLESS THERE IS A CHANGE IN 1. ALL DISTANCES SHOWN ARE HORIZONTAL GROUND
LAW OR OUR PUBLISHED REGULATIONS, THIS DISTANCES AND ARE IN FEET UNLESS OTHERWISE
DETERMINATION OF SECTION 404 JURISDICTION MAY BE NOTED.
RELIED UPON FOR A PERIOD NOT TO EXCEED FIVE YEARS 2. THIS MAP DOES NOT CONFORM TO GS 47 -30, AS
FROM THIS DATE. THIS DETERMINATION WAS MADE AMENDED. IT IS NOT INTENDED FOR RECORDATION.
UTILIZING THE 1987 CORPS OF ENGINEERS WETLANDS
vNi I DELINEATION MANUAL." THE SOLE PURPOSE THIS PLAT TO SHOW
J URISDICTIONAL BOUNDARIES AS DELINEATED BY S &ME,
INC.
NAME: ----------------------- - - - - -- 4. BASIS OF BEARING IS NORTH CAROLINA STATE
TITLE: ------
PLANE COORDINATE SYSTEM (NAD 83 /NSRS2007)
-----------------------
5. THE DISTURBANCE CORRIDOR IS NOT TO EXCEED 40'
DATE: ----------------------- - - - - -- IN WIDTH WITHIN THE JURISDICTIONAL BOUNDARIES,
EXCEPT WHERE NOTED.
I AID:
------------------------ - - - - --
Professional 18335 Old Statesville Roaa
Property Suite A
Pro
i WC1 P Y Cornelius, N.C. 28031
Surveyors, Inc. 704 - 765 -5134 Phone /Fax
DRAWN BY: DWL I SURVEY BY: DWL I JOB NO. 042611 -01
JURISDICTIONAL WATERS OF THE U.S.
AND IMPACT PLAN OF
PIEDMONT NATURAL GAS LINE
MECKLENBURG COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
SCALE: 1 " = 30'
iiii
30 15 0 30
DWG FILE: W7 SHEET: 7 OF 12 DATE: 12/16/2011
gd
a O I TE y ''
amp
�l
I 3
A
ry
VICINITY MAP `d
NOT TO SCALE
STREAM "3" FLAG TABLE
FLAG
LENGTH
BEARING
NORTHING
EASTING
S3.01
COMPUTED POINT
S1.001
N 607612.79
E 1438208.12
29 81'
N58°34'06"E
S3.02
N 607628.33
E 1438233.55
13.79'
N49 °45'15 "E
S3.03
N 607637.24
E 1438244.08
41.61'
N77 °34'20 "E
S3.04
N 607646.20
E 1441436.40
22.32'
N89 °36'56 "E
S3.05
N 607414.07
E 1438307.04
38.58'
S67 °38'26 "E
S3.06
N 607631.67
E 1438342.71
36.72'
1\155 °36'26"E
S3.07
N 607652.42
E 1438373.02
30.57'
S82 °27'34 "E
S3.08
N 607648.41
E 1438403.32
29.65'
S88 °47'29 "E
S3.09
N 607647.78
JE 1438432.97
STREAM 3
AREA: 829 SQ FT / 0.019 ACRE
LINEAR FEET: 95'
*THIS AREA WILL BE DIRECTIONALLY BORED TO
MINIMIZE IMPACTS ``,��111llllllll�
�'CN CARO -Oik
S Off ESS�O'��2��i
I, DARYL W. LONG, CERTIFY THAT A SURVEY WAS Z O ti'; i
MADE UNDER MY SUPERVISION AND THAT THE = �Q EA <�
WETLANDS SHOWN HEREON REFLECTS THE
DELINEATION EVIDENCE PROVIDED BY S & ME
ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES IN JULY OF 11.
W ' < -4918 Q:
/ _�___ I2 10 :�i 09��SURV &\ ��•
FA-9'E-W-. LONG PLS -491 �j '9
LEGEND !11111 1�NO�````
AREA TO BE DISTURBED
TEMPORARY IMPACT AREA
PERMANENT CONVERSION AREA
W1.001
WETLAND DELINEATION FLAG
CPS1.001
COMPUTED POINT
S1.001
STREAM DELINEATION FLAG
WETLAND STREAM BOUNDARY
EXISTING WOODS LINE
GAS
PROPOSED GAS LINE
- - - - - - -
PROPOSED EASEMENT
- - - - - - - - - -
IMPACT LIMIT
PROPERTY LINE
- -
TEMPORARY WORK SPACE
QS
SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE
SS
SANITARY SEWER LINE

--- G p N� ANNA FRANCES TINKMAN THERRELL
AS OS`cD HOWARD WAYNE THERRELL
_POSED \ GqS DB. 6012, PG. 330
`
40' GAS ��NE PIN: 015 - 105 -31
`♦ WETLANDS "C" \
• c
9
(�1 `
WC 10
„ WOODED AREA
ANNA FRANCES TINKMAN THERRELL
HOWARD WAYNE THERRELL
DB. 20463, PG. 81
PIN: 015- 105 -30
exis Wc.aN�e�
P-93 -ME -12
TING WOOD moo\ MECKLENBURG COUNTY
S C�Nf WOODED AREA °� DB. 11005, PG. 50
GREENWAY
MB. 30, PG. 733
�% v � PIN: 015 - 104 -99
F
-.
7..-7....
EASEMENT /TEMPORARY IMPACT LIMIT
0.062 AC
PERMANENT CONVERSION*
12,044 SQ FTI
¢ ..-
- - --
PERMANENT CONVERSION LIMIT
z ..
E 1440253.53
32.32'
S73 °40'08 "W
WC.02
N 606964.71
E 1440284.55
33.55'
o
S'..........
PROPOSED GAS LINE
a ... �.:.:.:.:..
. .
S58 °21 W
=
- -
EASEMENT /TEMPORARY IMPACT LIMIT
3
N75°58'"W
45
uh
TEMPORARY WORK SPACE
J
31.38
31.38'
IMPACT AREA DETAIL
WC.06
NOT TO SCALE
E 1440385.85
```111111CIIII1111/'
.%` '(N A RO
I, DARYL W. LONG, CERTIFY THAT A ,% Q' .........
�
SURVEY WAS MADE UNDER MY �� C) •'pF ti �i
SUPERVISION AND THAT THE WETLANDS =�Q L
SHOWN HEREON REFLECTS THE L
DELINEATION EVIDENCE PROVIDED BY S &
ME ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES IN JULY OF 2
2011. Vr L-4918 ��:
� •.ti0
DARYL W. LONG PLS L -4918 /1111111111111`
Professional 18335 Old Statesville Roaa
Property Suite A
Pro
i WC1 P Y Cornelius, N.C. 28031
Surveyors, Inc. 704 - 765 -5134 Phone /Fax
DRAWN BY: D WL SURVEY BY: DWL JOB NO. 042611 -01
WETLANDS C IMPACT
TEMPORARY IMPACT AREA
12,693 SQ FTJ
0.062 AC
PERMANENT CONVERSION*
12,044 SQ FTI
0.047 AC
*THIS AREA WIL BE DIRECTIONALLY BORED TO MINIMIZE IMPACTS
NOTES:
1. ALL DISTANCES SHOWN ARE HORIZONTAL GROUND
DISTANCES AND ARE IN FEET UNLESS OTHERWISE
NOTED.
2. THIS MAP DOES NOT CONFORM TO GS 47 -30, AS
AMENDED. IT IS NOT INTENDED FOR RECORDATION.
3. THE SOLE PURPOSE OF THIS PLAT IS TO SHOW
JURISDICTIONAL BOUNDARIES AS DELINEATED BY S &ME,
INC.
4. BASIS OF BEARING IS NORTH CAROLINA STATE
PLANE COORDINATE SYSTEM (NAD 83 /NSRS2007)
5. THE DISTURBANCE CORRIDOR IS NOT TO EXCEED 40'
IN WIDTH WITHIN THE JURISDICTIONAL BOUNDARIES,
EXCEPT WHERE NOTED.
JURISDICTIONAL WATERS OF THE U.S.
AND IMPACT PLAN OF
PIEDMONT NATURAL GAS LINE
MECKLENBURG COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
07
WC.06
"THIS CERTIFIES THAT THIS COPY OF THIS PLAT
ACCURATELY DEPICTS THE BOUNDARY OF THE
JURISDICTION OF SECTION 404 OF THE CLEAN
WATER ACTIN THE AREAS IMPACTED BY THE
PRESENT PROPOSED ACTIVITY, AS DETERMINED BY
THE UNDERSIGNED ON THIS DATE. OTHER AREAS
OF JURISDICTION MAY BE PRESENT ON THE SITE
BUT HAVE NOT BEEN DELINEATED. UNLESS THERE
IS A CHANGE IN LAW OR OUR PUBLISHED
REGULATIONS, THIS DETERMINATION OF SECTION
404 JURISDICTION MAY BE RELIED UPON FOR A
PERIOD NOT TO EXCEED FIVE YEARS FROM THIS
DATE. THIS DETERMINATION WAS MADE UTILIZING
THE 1987 CORPS OF ENGINEERS WETLANDS
DELINEATION MANUAL."
NAME: ------- - - - - --
TITLE: ------- - - - - --
DATE: ------- - - - - --
AID: ------- - - - - --
SCALE: 1 " = 30'
iiii
30 15 0 30
DWG FILE: W8 SHEET: 8 OF 12 DATE: 12/16/2011
s
N
z
f=i
a
0
z
Nunun
SI TE
A
4 0
4° �J
x
8U.Dd
ry
VICINITY MAP `d
NOT TO SCALE
1 °✓✓TF�9 Cm:�r �
�¢a
H
P tl
3
amp
� W
*-kll,,.
1--
WETLAND "C" FLAG TABLE
FLAG
LENGTH
BEARING
NORTHING
EASTING
WC.01
N 606955.62
E 1440253.53
32.32'
S73 °40'08 "W
WC.02
N 606964.71
E 1440284.55
33.55'
S55 °2955 W
WC.03
N 606983.71
E 1440312.20
21.38'
S58 °21 W
WC.04
N 606994.92
E 1440330.40
N75°58'"W
45
WC.05
N 606987.95
E 1440358.32
31.38
31.38'
N61'20'06 "W
WC.06
N 606972.90
E 1440385.85
23.90
N07 °50 21 'E
WC.07
N 606996.57
E 1440389.11
43.58'
S79 °04'50 "E
WC.08
N 607004.83
E 1440346.32
25.68'
S61 °57'16 "E
WC.09
N 607016.91
E 1440323.65
29.04'
S65 °36'57 "E
WCAO
N 607028.89
E 1440297.20
54.23'
N80 °54'22 "E
WC.11
N 607020.32
E 1440243.66
56.85'
N88 °1 0'00 "E
WC.12
N 607018.50
E 1440186.83
44.26'
N87 °08'50 "E
WC.13
N 607016.30
E 1440142.63
25.34'
N41'1 4'59"E
WC.14
N 606997.25
E 1440125.92
29.84'
N26 °1 8'37 "E
WC.15
N 606970.50
E 1440112.69
26.19'
N82 °09'41 "W
W4.16
N 606966.93
E 1433518.70
30.63'
S24 °30'58 "W
W4.17
N 606994.80
E 1440151.35
33.32'
S86 °25'29 "W
W4.18
N 606996.88
E 1440184.60
22.41'
S89 °48'38 "W
W4.19
N 606996.95
E 1440207.01
31.00'
N56 °23'21 "W
W4.20
N 606979.79
E 1440232.83
31.82'
N40°34'52 "W
W4.01
N 606955.62
IE 1440253.53
1111xe121►11F
W1.001
CPS1.001
S1.001
- -GAS--------
TEMPORARY IMPACT AREA
PERMANENT CONVERSION AREA
WETLAND AREA
WETLAND DELINEATION FLAG
COMPUTED POINT
STREAM DELINEATION FLAG
WETLAND STREAM BOUNDARY
EXISTING WOODS LINE
PROPOSED GAS LINE
PROPOSED EASEMENT
IMPACT LIMIT
PROPERTY LINE
TEMPORARY WORK SPACE

.... . — — ..
EASEMENT /TEMPORARY IMPACT LIMIT
¢ — :......
o
..-- . -. -..
PERMANENT CONVERSION LIMIT
.......
w
o ... cu ...v
...WOODED'.
LOT 16
M.B. 23 PG. 126
WOOD /
LDG. �.
/
TEMPORARY WORK SPACE
PID: 015- 105 -12
o
S'......
PROPOSED GAS LINE
f4--(4
SCOTT A. STARNES
W3.01
w
EASEMENT /TEMPORARY IMPACT LIMIT
W3.02
LOT 16
M.B. 23 PG. 126
WOOD /
LDG. �.
/
TEMPORARY WORK SPACE
PID: 015- 105 -12
,
IMPACT AREA DETAIL
NOT TO SCALE
"THIS CERTIFIES THAT THIS COPY OF THIS PLAT ACCURATELY DEPICTS
THE BOUNDARY OF THE JURISDICTION OF SECTION 404 OF THE CLEAN
WATER ACTIN THE AREAS IMPACTED BY THE PRESENT PROPOSED
ACTIVITY, AS DETERMINED BY THE UNDERSIGNED ON THIS DATE.
OTHER AREAS OF JURISDICTION MAY BE PRESENT ON THE SITE BUT
HAVE NOT BEEN DELINEATED. UNLESS THERE IS A CHANGE IN LAW
OR OUR PUBLISHED REGULATIONS, THIS DETERMINATION OF SECTION
404 JURISDICTION MAY BE RELIED UPON FOR A PERIOD NOT TO
EXCEED FIVE YEARS FROM THIS DATE. THIS DETERMINATION WAS
MADE UTILIZING THE 1987 CORPS OF ENGINEERS WETLANDS
DELINEATION MANUAL."
NAME: ------- - - - - --
TITLE: -------- - - - - --
DATE: ------- - - - - --
AID: - - -—
\A ,CAI& 00,,i
I, DARYL W. LONG, CERTIFY THAT A ��� Q'.••'ESS %'••//
SURVEY WAS MADE UNDER MY � _0 �pF
SUPERVISION AND THAT THE WETLANDS .4 L <•�
SHOWN HEREON REFLECTS THE
DELINEATION EVIDENCE PROVIDED BY S & 12 I I I
ME ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES IN JULY OF 2*
2011. j <9 L-4978 p..•
W
o�.�. 1216 I I - •,Ry� W •\,op
DARYL W. LONG PLS L-418 I���111j111���
Professional 18335 Old Statesville Road
Property Suite A
Pro
i WC1 P Y Cornelius, N.C. 28031
Surveyors, Inc. 704 - 765 -5134 Phone /Fax
DRAWN BY: DWL I SURVEY BY: DWL I JOB NO. 042611 -01
1- 93 -ME -20 \
BARBARA JEAN BETKER
STEVE HERBERT
D.B. 8485 PG. 79
LOT 15
/
EXISTING
WOOD
41�0
PS
/ G'
/
/ V
M.B. 23 PG. 126 •'
PID: 015 - 105 -13
EXISTINe
WOPD
. f!
00, /'
i
i 0
o�
/ S
VP , °
/ � MECKKENBURG COUNTY
D.B. 6426 PG. 104
0 � M.B. 23 PG. 176
� s M.B /23 PG. 126
4 PI2': 015 - 105 -15
JURISDICTIONAL WATERS OF THE U.S.
AND IMPACT PLAN OF
PIEDMONT NATURAL GAS LINE
MECKLENBURG COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
I
Iff
SCALE: 1 " = 30'
iiii
30 15 0 30
DWG FILE: W9 SHEET: 9 OF 12 DATE: 12/16/2011
t`
O
O
N
OMO
ai
a
x
°z
P �yu, � 'h hra,r�e� pia Vitt t
a° �J
1 :✓w�xnq cm:�r �
r,...na S¢dH
Nun P�
No""
amp
A
ry q
VICINITY MAP `d
NOT TO SCALE
WETLAND "D" FLAG TABLE
P- 93 -ME -21
LENGTH BEARING
f4--(4
SCOTT A. STARNES
W3.01
TLANDS "D"
D.B. 16484 PG. 222
EXIST G
W3.02
LOT 16
M.B. 23 PG. 126
WOOD /
LDG. �.
/
1 E 1441185.63
PID: 015- 105 -12
,
1- 93 -ME -20 \
BARBARA JEAN BETKER
STEVE HERBERT
D.B. 8485 PG. 79
LOT 15
/
EXISTING
WOOD
41�0
PS
/ G'
/
/ V
M.B. 23 PG. 126 •'
PID: 015 - 105 -13
EXISTINe
WOPD
. f!
00, /'
i
i 0
o�
/ S
VP , °
/ � MECKKENBURG COUNTY
D.B. 6426 PG. 104
0 � M.B. 23 PG. 176
� s M.B /23 PG. 126
4 PI2': 015 - 105 -15
JURISDICTIONAL WATERS OF THE U.S.
AND IMPACT PLAN OF
PIEDMONT NATURAL GAS LINE
MECKLENBURG COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
I
Iff
SCALE: 1 " = 30'
iiii
30 15 0 30
DWG FILE: W9 SHEET: 9 OF 12 DATE: 12/16/2011
t`
O
O
N
OMO
ai
a
x
°z
P �yu, � 'h hra,r�e� pia Vitt t
a° �J
1 :✓w�xnq cm:�r �
r,...na S¢dH
Nun P�
No""
amp
A
ry q
VICINITY MAP `d
NOT TO SCALE
WETLAND "D" FLAG TABLE
FLAG
LENGTH BEARING
NORTHING
FASTING
W3.01
0.001 AC
N 607356.73
E 1441298.77
189.88' N36-34'1 7"W
W3.02
N 607509.22
1 E 1441185.63
WETLANDS D IMPACT
TEMPORARY IMPACT AREA
180 SQ FT
0.002 AC
PERMANENT CONVERSION*
167 SQ FT
0.001 AC
NOTES:
1. ALL DISTANCES SHOWN ARE HORIZONTAL GROUND
DISTANCES AND ARE IN FEET UNLESS OTHERWISE
NOTED.
2. THIS MAP DOES NOT CONFORM TO GS 47 -30, AS
AMENDED. IT IS NOT INTENDED FOR RECORDATION.
3. THE SOLE PURPOSE OF THIS PLAT IS TO SHOW
JURISDICTIONAL BOUNDARIES AS DELINEATED BY S &ME,
INC.
4. BASIS OF BEARING IS NORTH CAROLINA STATE
PLANE COORDINATE SYSTEM (NAD 83 /NSRS2007)
5. THE DISTURBANCE CORRIDOR IS NOT TO EXCEED 40'
IN WIDTH WITHIN THE JURISDICTIONAL BOUNDARIES,
EXCEPT WHERE NOTED.
LEGEND
I[Mcw1pi-S0010010101
_ -- GAS
TEMPORARY IMPACT AREA
PERMANENT CONVERSION AREA
WETLAND AREA
WETLAND DELINEATION FLAG
COMPUTED POINT
STREAM DELINEATION FLAG
WETLAND STREAM BOUNDARY
EXISTING WOODS LINE
PROPOSED GAS LINE
PROPOSED EASEMENT
IMPACT LIMIT
PROPERTY LINE
TEMPORARY WORK SPACE
SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE
SANITARY SEWER LINE

.. ..... ........
EASEMENT /TEMPORARY IMPACT LIMIT
. .-
0.007 AC
ri�.
PERMANENT CONVERSION LIMIT
.r
W1.01
a°
i
N 607471.56
E 1441442.65
42.92'
N07'22'07 ' W
S'..........
PROPOSED GAS LINE
E 1441437.14
O��o �
� G
N00'26'01 "W
....�.....
=
.
- -
EASEMENT /TEMPORARY IMPACT LIMIT
�
1
`IUD
TEMPORARY WORK SPACE
IMPACT AREA DETAIL
00
NOT TO SCALE
W2.01
"THIS CERTIFIES THAT THIS COPY OF THIS PLAT ACCURATELY DEPICTS
THE BOUNDARY OF THE JURISDICTION OF SECTION 404 OF THE CLEAN
WATER ACTIN THE AREAS IMPACTED BY THE PRESENT PROPOSED
ACTIVITY, AS DETERMINED BY THE UNDERSIGNED ON THIS DATE.
OTHER AREAS OF JURISDICTION MAY BE PRESENT ON THE SITE BUT
HAVE NOT BEEN DELINEATED. UNLESS THERE IS A CHANGE IN LAW
OR OUR PUBLISHED REGULATIONS, THIS DETERMINATION OF SECTION
404 JURISDICTION MAY BE RELIED UPON FOR A PERIOD NOT TO
EXCEED FIVE YEARS FROM THIS DATE. THIS DETERMINATION WAS
MADE UTILIZING THE 1987 CORPS OF ENGINEERS WETLANDS
DELINEATION MANUAL."
NAME:
TITLE:
DATE:
AID:
NOTES:
1. ALL DISTANCES SHOWN ARE HORIZONTAL GROUND
DISTANCES AND ARE IN FEET UNLESS OTHERWISE
NOTED.
P- 93 -ME -22
JAMES F. BARBERIO
D.B. 10435 PG. 565
LOT 17
M.B. 23 PG. 126
PID: 015-105-11
2. THIS MAP DOES NOT CONFORM TO GS 47 -30, AS
AMENDED. IT IS NOT INTENDED FOR RECORDATION.
3. THE SOLE PURPOSE OF THIS PLAT IS TO SHOW
JURISDICTIONAL BOUNDARIES AS DELINEATED BY S &ME,
INC.
4. BASIS OF BEARING IS NORTH CAROLINA STATE
PLANE COORDINATE SYSTEM (NAD 83 /NSRS2007)
5. THE DISTURBANCE CORRIDOR IS NOT TO EXCEED 40'
IN WIDTH WITHIN THE JURISDICTIONAL BOUNDARIES,
EXCEPT WHERE NOTED.
LEGEND
TEMPORARY IMPACT AREA
PERMANENT CONVERSION AREA
WETLAND AREA
W1.001 WETLAND DELINEATION FLAG
CPS1.001 COMPUTED POINT
S1.001 STREAM DELINEATION FLAG
WETLAND STREAM BOUNDARY
EXISTING WOODS LINE
GAS PROPOSED GAS LINE
- - - - - - - PROPOSED EASEMENT
- - - - - - - - - - IMPACT LIMIT
PROPERTY LINE
- - TEMPORARY WORK SPACE
O SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE
SANITARY SEWER LINE
Professional 18335 Old Statesville Road
Property Suite A
Pro
i WC1 P Y Cornelius, N.C. 28031
Surveyors, Inc. 704 - 765 -5134 Phone /Fax
DRAWN BY: DWL SURVEY BY: DWL JOB NO. 042611 -01
P- 93 -ME -23
BARBARA JEAN BEKTER
STEVE HERBERT
D.B. 10850 PG. 807
LOT 18
M.B. 23 PG. 126
PID: 015 - 105 -10
i
W1.03
DS „E„ IF'P
2.01
I /�O
�O
AlQ �QS
i
'
02 �
S
G
P- 93 -ME -13
rl /
DS "01
/ VP
S y /
o
VP
PS
ol
/
W1.0 /
/ N
/ N
IP- 93 -ME -24
MECKLENBURG COUNTY
D.B. 6426 PG. 104
V2.03 M.B. 23 PG. 176
M.B. 23 PG. 126 /
/ D': 015 - 105 -15
1k
JURISDICTIONAL WATERS OF THE U.S.
AND RIPARIAN BUFFER IMPACT PLAN OF
PIEDMONT NATURAL GAS LINE
MECKLENBURG COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
H
I
MECKLENBURG COUNTY
D.B. 11026 PG. 781
GREENWAY
M.B. 30 PG. 743
M.B. 32 PG. 19
,.. . ,. '04
SCALE: 1 " = 30'
iiii
30 15 0 30
DWG FILE: W10 SHEET: 10 OF 12 DATE: 12/16/2011
P
�yu, 'h hra,r�e� pia Vitt t
�J
0.007 AC
i
i
0.006 AC
W1.01
a°
i
N 607471.56
E 1441442.65
42.92'
N07'22'07 ' W
W1.02
GAPS
E 1441437.14
O��o �
� G
N00'26'01 "W
W1.03
N 607559.09
�
�
1
M
N 607599.44
H
Nun
No""
00
W2.01
�O
E 1441367.25
amp
S08 °51'02 "W
W2'02
N 607463.68
i
W1.03
DS „E„ IF'P
2.01
I /�O
�O
AlQ �QS
i
'
02 �
S
G
P- 93 -ME -13
rl /
DS "01
/ VP
S y /
o
VP
PS
ol
/
W1.0 /
/ N
/ N
IP- 93 -ME -24
MECKLENBURG COUNTY
D.B. 6426 PG. 104
V2.03 M.B. 23 PG. 176
M.B. 23 PG. 126 /
/ D': 015 - 105 -15
1k
JURISDICTIONAL WATERS OF THE U.S.
AND RIPARIAN BUFFER IMPACT PLAN OF
PIEDMONT NATURAL GAS LINE
MECKLENBURG COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
H
I
MECKLENBURG COUNTY
D.B. 11026 PG. 781
GREENWAY
M.B. 30 PG. 743
M.B. 32 PG. 19
,.. . ,. '04
SCALE: 1 " = 30'
iiii
30 15 0 30
DWG FILE: W10 SHEET: 10 OF 12 DATE: 12/16/2011
ICAI& "Oki
I, DARYL W. LONG, CERTIFY THAT A ��� Q' (GSS * *1
SURVEY WAS MADE UNDER MY O •'pF 0 2 �i
SUPERVISION AND THAT THE WETLANDS _:
..
;Q
SHOWN HEREON REFLECTS THE � EAL _
DELINEATION EVIDENCE PROVIDED BY S & * /Z
ME ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES IN JULY OF
2011. Ir -491 0�:
ay SURV
O DARYL W LONG PLS L- 18 �"00 001111111 ` W ' 11����
1
WETLANDS E IMPACT
P
�yu, 'h hra,r�e� pia Vitt t
�J
0.007 AC
PERMANENT CONVERSION*
�
0.006 AC
W1.01
a°
N 607471.56
E 1441442.65
42.92'
N07'22'07 ' W
W1.02
N 607514.12
E 1441437.14
44.97'
N00'26'01 "W
W1.03
N 607559.09
r
N
40.34'
� a
4
S °
M
N 607599.44
H
Nun
No""
00
W2.01
N 607414.07
E 1441367.25
amp
S08 °51'02 "W
W2'02
N 607463.68
E 1441362.37
41.48'
S05 °44'05 "E
W
N 607504.95
E 1441358.22
49.85'
S05 °37'15 "E
W2.04
N 607547.45
E 1441364.84
VICINITY MAP
Z
NOT
TO SCALE
ICAI& "Oki
I, DARYL W. LONG, CERTIFY THAT A ��� Q' (GSS * *1
SURVEY WAS MADE UNDER MY O •'pF 0 2 �i
SUPERVISION AND THAT THE WETLANDS _:
..
;Q
SHOWN HEREON REFLECTS THE � EAL _
DELINEATION EVIDENCE PROVIDED BY S & * /Z
ME ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES IN JULY OF
2011. Ir -491 0�:
ay SURV
O DARYL W LONG PLS L- 18 �"00 001111111 ` W ' 11����
1
WETLANDS E IMPACT
TEMPORARY IMPACT AREA
303 SQ FT
0.007 AC
PERMANENT CONVERSION*
271 SQ FT
0.006 AC
WETLANDS F IMPACT
TEMPORARY IMPACT AREA
1177 SQ FT
10.004 AC
PERMANENT CONVERSION*
1168 SQ FT
10.004 AC
WETLAND
"E, F "' FLAG TABLE
FLAG
LENGTH
BEARING
NORTHING
EASTING
W1.01
N 607471.56
E 1441442.65
42.92'
N07'22'07 ' W
W1.02
N 607514.12
E 1441437.14
44.97'
N00'26'01 "W
W1.03
N 607559.09
E 1441436.80
40.34'
N00'34'1 3 "W
W1.04
N 607599.44
E 1441436.40
W2.01
N 607414.07
E 1441367.25
43.00'
S08 °51'02 "W
W2'02
N 607463.68
E 1441362.37
41.48'
S05 °44'05 "E
W2.03
N 607504.95
E 1441358.22
49.85'
S05 °37'15 "E
W2.04
N 607547.45
E 1441364.84

co
0 -100
:E <
r CD rD CD
N
O� N
O
3
n
c 3
< n
m
Cl) 1400
OOCao
?� �W
0
�= DN
Wy O
I- a
L?'z
N
O Wn p
C0
CD
O 300 <
00
LA
CD
o
o x a
M
D
C) z`
fr'l��N
ZM-00
co 0DC7
C K: ;
M O D
C) Z Z Z
0 �
00 r-
ozc
cD -q:E
D
<;o ;am
D _
Z r K: N
ON >0
DZ m
M 0 Z C
r- N
z O•
D �
0
r
M
i
L4
0
M r
O
II
N �
0
D
m
N
rn
N
0
W
0
-u 41
D
z >
m D
nFI)
�o Tl
0_
Z co
mZ
U0
M Z
�o
z-j
D =
oC)
00 D
C,J 'u
O
Z r
U) Z
�u D
O D
�m
� -\4
mc�'
Z7
Cn =
0 m
C-) (f)
�O
Om
D C
CD �u
00
Z cn
0 m
;o O
m
C/)�
>
O m
mr
rD
Z �
m�
D
m0
0
W C/)
O
Cn :E
m
U)
M
m
D N
0
o
J
\ � GAS
``
M /
6D Cys
°6D 6o b
w�u— '
cn rQ M N) c W m CD C�
I �zrn;;u
o C) CD
p� vc �cn Sd . ti0
CA 00 Z m M ' � /
/
say _
/ DI 2MM=cc
�I COM <O
r D
D fv
K'
M
z=
O
m U)
o�
D
(n O
O
Z
O Cn
�z
20
mn
Z
0 Z
mm
� O
m�
OK:
�l O
m0
o C/) O
OJ
DI
00
z-
D
(n
r
M
C)
(n(n�v�� -u mvm* U) 0* * -u � D
DDmA Ax�xm -4Omm m m �
-0-u D D -u -1- r- m r- r-� v y
D D O m 0 0 O Z O z Z> c Z Z D O
-<-< D A r r m O m O 0 m 0 O m D 0
N N X -< R R 0 O 0 i N Mo 0 0 D z x CU
`E`E`2Z DNDO;u zpC M C7 frl
.Zm7.Zu;u f*I M2 NND >zM D z u N
� Z r D < D
r z m Z z m m e
m= D m M Z z N D o0
Om o y � z D 0
M > O > D
X X
M
D
Z O
O
M D D
Z
no
�C/)
Z Z
om
D Cn
Zu
M=
20
m Z
cm
Z=
rp
m�
C/)O
OZ
S D
mr
X0
Cf)O
M
Z
0
oi�
I
D
N
Gl
O D O MM
Z<ZZDZ
(1)
�0 ZM 0
r-�� o
/
M
z
N
OI
III
D
N��
2M0
0
� �
Z D
000
V1 0
O
O�
O
(�
°No
O
.c
cn: C7
0)
Cn
�
C,d
o00
�I�MC),c
I �Z�Z7
C)
1111111
I
i
iN
�
GJ
r
co
Jo 00 O
p
CO
(O
C1t
OD
N
(O
W
i
z
--A
CA
Cn
-4
(n(n�v�� -u mvm* U) 0* * -u � D
DDmA Ax�xm -4Omm m m �
-0-u D D -u -1- r- m r- r-� v y
D D O m 0 0 O Z O z Z> c Z Z D O
-<-< D A r r m O m O 0 m 0 O m D 0
N N X -< R R 0 O 0 i N Mo 0 0 D z x CU
`E`E`2Z DNDO;u zpC M C7 frl
.Zm7.Zu;u f*I M2 NND >zM D z u N
� Z r D < D
r z m Z z m m e
m= D m M Z z N D o0
Om o y � z D 0
M > O > D
X X
M
D
Z O
O
M D D
Z
no
�C/)
Z Z
om
D Cn
Zu
M=
20
m Z
cm
Z=
rp
m�
C/)O
OZ
S D
mr
X0
Cf)O
M
Z
0
oi�
Z7�2N
zzxz>.
Z
I
O D O MM
Z<ZZDZ
(1)
�0 ZM 0
r-�� o
/
(10 C)
N
x 0 .Z7
-I
NIN
00 =A�
MM =
lip
2M0
0
� �
Z D
000
V1 0
O
O�
O
O
'y �.�
O
.c
cn: C7
0)
Cn
�
C,d
N
�I�MC),c
I �Z�Z7
C)
1111111
_
D
m
D
�mr
Z ED M D (n
�M> ;;u
mo DD
�mm
nm D �
O �
�
Z O
D
r
r
O
Z7
m
0
O
(1)
(1)
(1)
(1)
(1)
(1)
/
N
N
N
N
N
N
-Ti
O
O
O
O
O
O
D
0 _p, ;;u � Z
7
0)
Cn
�
C,d
N
�I�MC),c
I �Z�Z7
C)
-,I
�
W
N
�
GJ
r
co
Jo 00 O
p
CO
(O
C1t
OD
N
(O
W
60
z
CA
Cn
-4
-4
-Pt
�
m
U)
U)
U)
U)
U)
Up)
-pl
W
0)
-pl
W
-i
(O
-'I
(O
00
CC)
;u
Cli
N
N
D
D
o�
rn
w
a�
K:
O
Cn
U
Z z
Cn
o
z
z
z
z
z
z
z
r-
X
rn
rn
rn
rn
rn
rn
C)
000000--i
�I
v
v
v
v
v
=�
Un
0)
0)
0)
0)
0)
Z
y
O
�
u
-1I
00
c0
rn
p
(O
00
(O
r
Cn
0)
0
.i
io
.A
m
00
0)
0)
(O
(O
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
z
UUMMMMO
N
�I
O
W
(n
O
O
rn
(O
--I
O
CD
CP
00
M
3
O —1 z O -jOM-;,Zl�000 -jM * -D
D D M =DMOM C -Ti =�uDc�=
r K r m��u -;�G7D� mm��O-
m m m z,m C C- cnm�ccn
°� 22zz
D
I I 0° z22 �D <w0-- D> Dm
I I pJ =OWOZmOm�Ozjm�
I I zc�cn�oz0z0W�u Z 1
�o� - -j- 0Z m
I I z �m0z =_zWzmo�m�cn
I I D O�C)K: >MDOpmmO=
I j rm- m >o *z -<OzD >mw�
I I _Z>o
I I 0--� Mm�mm=�DZ ==
I i zz :; KKOZVW— -;,mN
I I m mmz�>m0: <K-; O00
I � * -< rD �cnD -0 C
I WDmm�Mmm�DDpZM
II `Lw > Z 0 0c0Z[Tl '0m0-<
m � m �u
I I cnc r o �
I I �D -u0 c0pm0 = -< -Ti
I �0- Tj0 -Ti =ZZ�� m
I I Dm�uz mr =MCD O=
I I ���mnO�m�� -imm�
I I N =�0 �U) Cu0 ZmD
I I Z D z
mm D
I I G) � U) -<
m
NORTH PER NAD 83/2007
L
z
�Z
Off;'
fL Ha
O �
frTl = U)
Mt'
go � m
R0`ti'8Ad W Q ' y
!6
T
/
o�
r�
-U K: CD C)
oW r
G7 fV M
(n
0 _p, ;;u � Z
7
N
-1
Omm
M ID
r°
D
�I�MC),c
I �Z�Z7
�D
r°v
C
Z7
co
Jo 00 O
WD
Cn Z
rp
w�
�-1
o
cn 0
m
O —1 z O -jOM-;,Zl�000 -jM * -D
D D M =DMOM C -Ti =�uDc�=
r K r m��u -;�G7D� mm��O-
m m m z,m C C- cnm�ccn
°� 22zz
D
I I 0° z22 �D <w0-- D> Dm
I I pJ =OWOZmOm�Ozjm�
I I zc�cn�oz0z0W�u Z 1
�o� - -j- 0Z m
I I z �m0z =_zWzmo�m�cn
I I D O�C)K: >MDOpmmO=
I j rm- m >o *z -<OzD >mw�
I I _Z>o
I I 0--� Mm�mm=�DZ ==
I i zz :; KKOZVW— -;,mN
I I m mmz�>m0: <K-; O00
I � * -< rD �cnD -0 C
I WDmm�Mmm�DDpZM
II `Lw > Z 0 0c0Z[Tl '0m0-<
m � m �u
I I cnc r o �
I I �D -u0 c0pm0 = -< -Ti
I �0- Tj0 -Ti =ZZ�� m
I I Dm�uz mr =MCD O=
I I ���mnO�m�� -imm�
I I N =�0 �U) Cu0 ZmD
I I Z D z
mm D
I I G) � U) -<
m
NORTH PER NAD 83/2007
L
z
�Z
Off;'
fL Ha
O �
frTl = U)
Mt'
go � m
R0`ti'8Ad W Q ' y
!6

IBM
co
p
X00
moo
:E
r
<
1< rn
NEW 40'
I
I GAS EASEMENT
0
Ln
a
I I
I
<
I
m
co
OD OO C
I °
I z
o
Zw
1 m
I zI *
r
V° N
-
=y
Ln y Q
G1
u- E
�_
I �"' N I
C-
Wb o
�'
l O Z °
z
p
m
SONG <.
r
I; m
1 ) I
00
I
o
N
L4
CD
°
I
o
m
I o f
O
n n
X a
D
c,
I y
1- 0 =L°
Z
o
cmom am
=
.
m
O O
s
-o-0 I _m
D -_ �
=
SAM \
n
(ALn
—°
�
I - -I I
M
m c�
i
Z m
c)
V)�
L)
I y I
°
c
mm
o
cn
K
Z
p— m
a I
C)
C
D
I
II II
o Z
C)
A p
I I
I
C D
Dz
I I I
0
m>
I I I I
c
N
I
D
I I rNl
zr
I III m�I
O
Ln
ICI -xi Nm°
I
;u >
(n
laloD Oz
I IyI�D �'m I
r
D z
0 NCI
I I z
I I I
I m
;u m
z
O
O
m
r
z
D
0
m
N
N
NEW 40'N,
j
GAS EASEMENT
m
D
m
i
mm
N
zm
I I I
O
m
Z
\
I
I
pr
�z
I I
D
N
!
ON
I II I
�
I
OOmD
Z-. �
I r°
zmr °
O
X�
I
�cziy
I W gym
m
?
rnu)
U)
(C:,
� No 0rmm
C7
Iz� o?
`z
p
CO
W r D�D�
C)c
D
r
°O
m
Z
M
Ln
m
c °-
r
°- '''o�Z
r Dmmp
��� VIA` I I
m ODr°
N
C7
z
r z
z0
Z7T�0\
p
O m O
Iv< vi -I °
°C m z°
m —
=
N
mx
I
U DAm�
O
Icy
C
mm
I
i
� Kp
I
M
o
Z
o
Ic,l -W
I ICI °_�
I
o D
X
o
L° I =mom -°
or
�
o�
_
cn
cn (n
D .
D .
r M
M O
X
D
v
O
r Z
m
=�
ICI
z
r
x
I IDI
r
m
Ln
>
lyl
i
m
i
D
0
A
->
°
c
o
!
!I
r-
e
N
Z Om
pD
I I
IDII �;I I
o
°D
I iyil.;!I I
0
iI
C
o
0 I
I
I �_
o
co
I
m
`o'I
,U) I
I m
v'
O
>Z
z m
I I
<O� °
r-II
I z
i
z
D
Z
m>
N
I`C'I I
rvn
j I �°- Ln
I
I
m r N I
I l
l
f-
i i
I IDI Oz
!I _
tom
lyl moll
I
I
z
s
j jvx SCI
!
>z
I II Ip-< X
I I IAD o7
D
xo z
O
m

APPENDIX V:
AGENCY CORRESPONDENCE

Beverly Eaves Perdue, Governor
Linda A. Carlisle, Secretary
Jeffrey J. Crow, Deputy Secretary
August 31, 2011
Kimberly Nagle
S &ME, Inc.
134 Suber Road
Columbia, SC 29210
North Carolina Department of Cultural Resources
State Historic Preservation Office
Claudia Brown, Acting Administrator
Office of Archives and History
Division of I listorical Resources
David Brook, Director
Re: Draft Report, PNG Huntersville Strengthening Project, S &ME 1357 -11 -005 Phase 3,
Mecklenburg County, ER 11 -0749
Dear Ms. Nagle:
Thank you for your letter of July 29, 2011, transmitting the above referenced report. The report author states
that no previously known or newly recorded archaeological sites were identified within the confines of the
project corridor,and that no additional archaeological investigations are necessary or warranted. We concur
with this assessment.
We have determined that the project as proposed will not have an effect on any historic structures.
The above comments are made pursuant to Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act and the
Advisory Council on Historic Preservation's Regulations for Compliance with Section 106 codified at 36 CFR
Part 800.
Thank you for your cooperation and consideration. If you have questions concerning the above comment,
please contact Renee Gledhill- Earley, environmental review coordinator, at 919 -807 -6579. In all future
communication concerning this project, please cite the above - referenced tracking number.
Sincerely,
,.-
/Claudia Brown
Location: 109 East Jones Street, Raleigh NC 27601 Mailing Address: 4617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh NC 27699 -4617 Telephone /Fax: (919) 807 - 6570/807 -6599

United States Department of the Interior
FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE
Asheville Field Office
160 Zillicoa Street
Asheville, North Carolina 28801
May 11, 2011
Ms. Crystal Fox
S &ME, Inc.
9751 Southern Pine Boulevard
Charlotte, North Carolina 28273
Subject: Listed Species Assessment, Proposed PNG Huntersville Pipeline Installation Project,
located East of Vance Road North, West of Huntersville, Meclenburg County, North
Carolina
Dear Ms. Fox:
On April 29, 2011, we received a letter from you requesting our comments about the subject
project. We have reviewed the information you presented and are providing the following
comments in accordance with the provisions of the Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act, as
amended (16 U.S.C. 661- 667e), and section 7 of the Endangered Species Act of 1973, as
amended (16 U.S.C. 1531 -1543) (Act).
According to the information that you presented, PNG is proposing to install a new natural gas
pipeline near Huntersville. The pipeline will be installed parallel to an existing sewer line.
However, a new 50 -foot right -of -way will be cleared for the new gas line. A majority of the
project area is undeveloped and forested with areas of open agricultural land. The installation of
the pipeline will require several stream crossings of Torrence Creek and unnamed tributary(ies) to
Torrence Creek. Your letter states that a Section 404 /Clean Water Act permit will be needed but
did not include specific details as to the amount of stream and wetland impacts associated with
the project. Also, the letter did it include specific plans as to stream crossing method(s) that will
be used.
Endangered Species. Based on the project location and pictures obtained from the Union
County GIS web site, there appears to be suitable habitat for the federally endangered
Schweinitz's sunflower (Helianthus schweinitzii). This plant has been found within a few miles
of the project site. Schweinitz's sunflower occurs in relatively open habitats —road, power line,
and other maintained rights -of -way; early successional fields; forest ecotonal margins; forest
clearings; etc. The species thrives in full sun but also grows in the light shade of open stands of
oak- pine - hickory. Schweinitz's sunflower generally occurs on soils characterized as moist to
dryish clays, clay - loams, or sandy -clay loams that often have high gravel content. The species is
known from a variety of soil types, including Iredell (Fine, Montmorillonitic, Thermic Typic
Hapluduff), Enon (Fine, Mixed, Thermic Ultic Hapludalf), and Cecil (Clayey, Kaolinitic,

Thermic Typic Hapludult). Unless an area has been specifically surveyed for this listed species
or no appropriate habitat exists, a survey should be conducted to ensure that this species is not
inadvertently lost. Schweinitz's sunflower is difficult to identify at any time, but even more so
outside the flowering season of late August to October, so we recommend that surveys for this
species be conducted during this period. In accordance with the Act, it is the responsibility of
the appropriate federal agency or its designated representative to review its activities or programs
and to identify any such activities or programs that may affect endangered or threatened species
or their habitats. If it is determined that the proposed activity may adversely affect any species
federally listed as endangered or threatened, formal consultation with this office must be
initiated.
We also have records of Georgia aster (Symphyotrichum georgianum), a federal candidate for
listing' in the area. Although the provisions of section 7 of the Act do not currently apply to
candidate species, we would greatly appreciate your assistance in determining if any are present
within the project corridor. If any are present, impacts to them should be avoided. Georgia
aster, like Schweinitz's sunflower, is difficult to identify outside its flowering season (early
October to mid - November), and it resembles two other asters that often occur in the same habitat
types (dry open woods along roadsides and utility corridors, overgrown rights -of -way, woodland
borders, old fields, and pastures). Surveys conducted during the period of mid - September
through mid - October would cover the flowering seasons for both Schweinitz's sunflower and
Georgia aster.
Stream Crossings - We are concerned with the stream- crossing technique (open -cut trenching)
that is being proposed for this project. From our past experiences with similar projects, we
believe this technique increases the likelihood of future lateral movement of the stream (which
could undercut or erode around the utility line), and the correction of these problems could result
in additional future maintenance and impacts to the stream. Therefore, we recommend the use of
directional boring under the stream in order to prevent stream impacts. All utility crossings
should be kept to a minimum, and all utility infrastructures should be kept out of riparian buffer
areas. Directional boring under streams significantly minimizes impacts to aquatic resources and
riparian buffers. If this method cannot be used and trenching is determined to be the only viable
method, the crossing should be made perpendicular to the stream flow, and we recommend the
development of a stream -bank monitoring and maintenance program that would allow for the
prompt stabilization of stream banks near the utility crossing (should any stream -bank erosion or
destabilization occur) throughout the life of this project.
Erosion Control and Wetland/Stream Protection. Given the proximity of the project to
aquatic environments, measures to control sediment and erosion should be installed before any
ground disturbing activities occur. Grading and backfilling should be minimized, and existing
vegetation should be retained (if possible) to maintain shoreline cover for fish and wildlife.
' "Taxa for which the [Fish and Wildlife] Service has on file enough substantial information on biological
vulnerability and threat(s) to support proposals to list them as endangered or threatened. Proposed rules have not yet
been issued because this action is precluded at present by other listing activity. Development and publication of
proposed rules on these taxa are anticipated. The Service encourages State and other Federal agencies as well as
other affected parties to give consideration to these taxa in environmental planning" (Federal Register, February 28,
1996). Taxa formerly considered as "Category 1" are now considered as "candidates."

Disturbed areas should be revegetated with native grass and tree species as soon as the project is
completed.
We appreciate the opportunity to provide these comments. If we can be of assistance or if you
have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact Mr. Bryan Tompkins of our staff at
828/258 -3939, Ext. 240. In any future correspondence concerning this project, please reference
our Log Number 4 -2 -11 -207.
Sincerely,
- - original signed - -
Brian P. Cole
Field Supervisor

f�b b
North. Carolina Department of Cultural Resources
State Historic Preservation Office
Claudia Brown, Acting Administrator
Beverly Laves Perdue, Governor
Lida A. Carlisle, Secretary
Jeffrey J. Crow, Deputy Secretary
May 11, 2011
Crystal J. Fox
S &ME, Inc.
9751 Southern Pine Boulevard
Charlotte, NC 28273 -5560
Office of Archives and History
Division of Historical Resources
David Brook, Director
Re: PNG Huntersville Strengthening Project, S &ME 1357 -11 -005, Mecklenburg, County, ER 11 -0749
Dear Ms. Fox:
Thank you for your letter of April 25, 2011, concerning the above project.
Based on the probable location of a water - powered mill in the immediate project area, we have determined that
there is a high probability that additional archaeological sites may exist within the project area. We therefore
recommend that if any earth moving activities are scheduled to take place, that a comprehensive archaeological
survey be conducted by an experienced archaeologist to identify and evaluate the significance of any
archaeological remains that may be damaged or destroyed by the proposed project. Please note that in reference to
this project, our office requires that prior to the initiation of the archaeological eld investigation consultation with the Office of State
Archaeology be undertaken to determine the appropriate field methodology.
If an archaeological field investigation is conducted, two copies of the resulting archaeological survey report, as
well as one copy of the appropriate site forms should be forwarded to us for review and comment as soon as
they are available and well in advance of any earth moving activities.
We have determined that the project as proposed will not have an effect on any historic structures.
The above comments are made pursuant to Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act and and the
Advisory Council on Historic Preservation's Regulations for Compliance with Section 106 codified at 36 CFR
Part 800.
Thank you for your cooperation and consideration. If you have questions concerning the above comment,
please contact Renee Gledhill- Earley, environmental review coordinator, at 919 - 807 -6579. In all future
communication concerning this project, please cite the above - referenced tracking number.
Sincerely,
l V .._
4 �
Claudia Brown
e
Location: 109 East Jones Street, Raleigh NC 27601 Mailing Address: 4617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh NC 27699 -4617 Telephone /Fax: (919) 807 - 6570/807 -6599

North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Office of Conservation, Planning, & Community Affairs
Beverly Eaves Perdue, Governor Linda Pearsall, Director
May 9, 2011
Ms. Crystal J. Fox
S &ME, Inc.
9751 Southern Pine Boulevard
Charlotte, NC 28273 -5560
Subject: PNG Huntersville Strengthening Project; Mecklenburg County
S &ME Project No. 1357 -11 -005
Dear Ms. Cox:
Dee Freeman, Secretary
The Natural Heritage Program has several records of rare species, significant natural heritage areas,
and/or conservation /managed areas within the project area. The proposed pipeline comes very close to
impacting the Regionally significant McDowell /Torrence Creek Confluence Slopes natural area, located
just south of McDowell Creek (see enclosed snap). The project maps (Figures 2 and 3) suggested that the
pipeline to be located on the south side of the creels and thus would cut across the lower slopes of the
natural area. However, an e -mail from Joey Lawler, of S &ME, dated May 5, indicated that the pipeline
would be moved to the north side of the creek, avoiding the natural area.
The State Significantly Rare northern cup -plant (Silphiuin per.foliatum) is found in a scattered population
(at least when last observed in 1995) on both sides of the creek in the same vicinity (see attached
material). Some plants were present along the margins of the existing sewerline right -of -way on the
north side of the creels, where the gasline will also be placed. Thus, it is possible that a few plants could
be lost with the construction, but that plants might appear afterwards along the right -of -way margins.
And, with some plants on the south side of the creek, it is likely that the population will still be present
after construction. Nonetheless, S &ME staff may want to search for this plant before construction, to
flag off the plants or the plant habitats, such that any damage can be minimized.
Please do not hesitate to contact me at 919 -715 -8697 if you have questions or need further information.
Sincerely,
Harry E. LeGrand, Jr., Zoologist
Natural Heritage Program
Enclosures
1601 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699 -1601
Phone: [phone] \ FAX: 919 - 715 -3060 Internet: www.oneNCNaturally.org
An Equal Opportunity 1 Affirmative Action Employer — 50% Recycled \ 10% Post Consumer Paper
NorthCarolina
Naturally
Natural Resources Planning and Conservation

...... LIF.
ON
7 7,
7%' 1 C
0
MR.
AF
0 C�
IS
INN,
Zip
cu
C; 21
4-
'Se
5D
4- CD
L �Ll
m C\j
ZD :0�3 V)
C- E 75
(D — "L
o LO
z:p Ln
46
.1 Yll(
fir
Id,

vations an soils / geology ----- - - - - -- _ - - -_
Any obser - - -_ ----- - - - - -- -- ---- - - - - -- - ®•
- ` - - - - -- - - - - -- - �habitat� (suc successional status etc. )
Quality '&
-Integrity of communit z- -Is-,- --- - --
-- ` =--- ----------
- - - -- - -r�-=
Tg8EaTE
c e t'�V , -
Disturbance /Threat Eviden ------ a - - - ---- - - - Y -
-- - "� l_
- - - - - - _
- - w I _ - --
r - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - ------------ - - P r r - - - - - - _ -----
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - w -
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - w -----------
P- oat tr er nw _ w a l Threats
T h r e a tw s r - s -O - - - - - - - - - - - w - - - - - -
- w r - - - - - - __ --
- - - - - - - - - - - - - ®
0 - - - - - - - + ..
CQtSEBY�TI4�1Lt �a���EBo NEEDS oration is declining?. rope the
Do you think the vigor,of the pop
What specific management techniques are needed to sustain or imp
quality of this occurrence? protection
ou recommend further.: investigations here or ianm�di:at.. P
would y -_-+--®----------------------------
°� - - - - - - - -------------- - - - - - - - - - -
ef•t.Cr`t8 _r-- r- ++ -
G®riwrr---- --- - -. ° -° r-- -_ I--r-- -®- --I +.
- - - w - - --------- -'�! -----------
-- - - +--- -- ---- --- - -- ..
- - - - - -----------------
w r r•- - - r s w ----------- i ------------
w •
--------------
- r - w - - w - - r 1 r - r - - - w _ r w - - - - r® - r - - r - _ - - - I w - - - - - - - -
- - - r - - - - - - - - -- - - r
- ® - - - - ----------------- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - O _ - I - _ - - r - _- - - - P -
-----------
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ---------
_ _ _ ® - - ®- + --------------
- - - - - - - - -
--------------------------------
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - O - - - - - - - - - - I •° - - I - I - I - w I - + - - - w - - - - r w I - ------------------------ w
_ - -- - -- - - ------ 0 + ®---------------------
_- ® ►--- _- ®-- ® + ®' - - -0 w I- - rI +, +O•- w ®- wl�i - - -ea
- - - - - - P - - - - w -----------
- -----------------------
- -- - --- +- -- -- location
- -- ®----- ite, .with rare species
please draw below a sketch 'of the s t road
I marked, scale and eompass direction .saindicstopa.anorPcoun yty,to
clear y
prominent features included. t►lso attach c gY
map indicating exact, location of population.
G L LLA� - .
.4* - I 1 E:
i
M
JoE 10fil<C -2 p "
•Ownership information a�tachedNo ®YCvll�ctor,sb dame: J01443- :� G�z � --
'Specimens collected? Yes _ ,
Repository: _C:. -_ -- =- - -` - --
* * * **
Please send this form to either of the agencies below:
cant Conservation Program
N.C. Natural Heritage program N.C• P
DNRCDr Div- Parks & Recreation N.C. Dept. of Agrigulture
P.O. sox NC62�611
p.0. Box 27687 Raleigh,
RAI&ich, NC 27611

2008 -07 -16
ID 14739 Scientific Name Silphium perfoliatum Principal EO EO Number 15
mmary
ition US State NC
moron Name Northern Cup -plant Global Rank G5 State Rank S1
feral Protection Status State Protection Status SR -P ELCODE BCD PDAST8LOA0
�eatorslDirections
3GS Quad Name Margin Num County Name
.ke Norman South Mecklenburg (NC)
itershed
)50 101 - Upper Catawba
Jtude 352418N Longitude 0805343W
e Name Survey Site
dowelUTorrence Creek Confluence Slope Mecklenburg County, McDowell Creek
•ections ON BOTH SIDES OF MCDOWELL CREEK ABOUT 2.3 MILES SOUTH OF LAKE NORMAN, 0.1 MILE SOUTH OF SR
2136 (GILEAD ROAD); ON SOUTH SIDE OF THE CREEK AND OIL THE NORTH SIDE IN SEWER LINE RIGHT -OF-
WAY.
rvey Information
sic EO Rank C - Fair estimated viability EO Rank Date 1995 -08 -23
Rank Comment
Data Present at two additional locations; observed in 2006 by Mecklenburg County Park & Rec staff; number of plants not reported
[unclear if original location was observed] (Coffey 2007).11-50 STEMS IN LEAF, FLOWER AND FRUIT IN A 10 -100
SQUARE -METER AREA ON 23 AUGUST 1995 (SOULE 1995).
urce Feature ID 45741
urce Feature Descriptor Torrence Cr. Greenway - new 2006 locations
vey 'Type Surveyor Kim Coffey, Meck Co Park & Rec
vey Date 2006 First Observation Date 1995 -08 -23 Last Observation Date 2006
:a Sensitive Element N Comments
nitoring Needs Comments
earch Needs Comments
litional Inventory Needed N Comments
scription
feral Description IN OPEN SEWERLINE RIGHT -OF -WAY WITH AMBROSIA AND RUDBECKIA LACINIATA; EARLY
SUCCESSIONAL DUE TO DISTURBANCE (SOULE 1995).
i. Elevation feet Max. Elevation feet
Observed Area acres
Accuracy Medium
neral Comments:
vnership/Protection
ner Name PRIVATE
Separation Comments
Owner Note
ner Comments JOE BOCKER PROPERTY
nagement Comments SEWERLINE RIGHT -OF -WAY MOWING IS EVIDENCE OF DISTRUBANCE (SOULE 1995).
tection Comments THE HERITAGE PRESERVATION IN MECKLENBURG IS IN THE PRELIMINARY STAGES OF TRYING
TO PURCHASE THIS AREA (J. MATTHEWS 1995).
litional Topics
mmentationNersion
erence Code Citation
'COFOINCUS Coffey, K. 2007. Locations of NC Rare and Watch List Species in Mecklenburg County. Unpublished data
(shapefile and excel spreadsheet) collected for the Mecklenburg County Division of Natural Resources.
cimen
W.UNCC J.T.SOULE S.N. 23 AUGUST 1995.
d Responsibility USNCHP Version Date 2008 -06 -24 Transcription Date 1995 -08 -25
sion Author Mason Transcribed By JLA

APPENDIX VI:
RESTORATION PLAN

RESTORATION PLAN
PNG Huntersville Strengthening Project
Huntersville, North Carolina
The proposed project has been designed to avoid and minimize jurisdictional impacts
where practicable. As part of mitigation for unavoidable impacts, the following plan shall
be implemented to restore temporarily- affected wetlands and streams. This plan entails
restoration of temporarily- disturbed areas to their original contours and conditions to the
degree practicable upon project completion. Further, disturbed wetland areas and
streambanks will be permanently stabilized with a native vegetative cover. Affected
streambanks will also be planted with woody species. The measures outlined below will
be specified in the contract documents prepared for construction of the proposed project.
Proposed restoration activities will include the removal of placed fill material and
restoration of original pre- disturbance contours. Excavated material shall be returned to
the trench to the extent possible, and remaining material relocated and retained on an
upland site. Excavated topsoil will be stockpiled separately, kept viable, and then replaced
uniformly over the area of excavation from which it was removed. The native seed mix
identified in Table 1 below will be utilized within temporarily- disturbed portions of the
ROW comprised of wetlands.
Table 1: Wetland Seed Mix
Species
Common Name
Percentage of Mix
Elymus ripanus
Riverbank wild rye
20
Agrostis stolonifera
Creeping bentgrass
15
Carex vulpinoidea
Fox sedge
12
Panicum virgatum
Switchgrass
15
Poa palustris
Fowl bluegrass
15
Dichanthelium clandestinum
Deer tongue
08
Bidens aristosa
Bidens
04
Juncus effusus, NC Ecotype
Soft rush
04
Aster lateriflorus
Calico aster
03
Sagittaria latifolia
Duck potato
02
Saururus cernuus
Lizards tail
02
100
Wetland Seed Mix to be applied to all wetland areas extending five feet landward following construction.
Recommended application rate: 20 -25 lbs. per acre.
At temporarily- affected streambanks, the native riparian seed mix specified in Table 2 below
shall be utilized.

Restoration Plan S &ME project No. 1357 -11 -005
PNG Huntersville Strengthening Protect December 17, 2012
Table 2: Riparian Seed Mix*
Species
Common Name
Percentage of Mix
Elymus virginicus
Virginia wild rye
15
Panicum virgatum
Switchgrass
15
Agrostis stolinifera
Creeping bentgrass
10
Rudbeckia hirta, NC ecotype
Black -eyed Susan
10
Coreopsis lanceolata
Lance leaf tickseed
10
Panicum clandestinum
Deer tongue
10
Andropogon gerardii
Big bluestem
05
Juncus effusus
Soft rush
05
Echinochloa muricata
Awned barnyard grass
05
Schizachyrium scoparium
Little bluestem
05
Sorghastrum nutans
Indian grass
05
Tripsacum dactyloides
Gamma
05
100
Riparian Seed Mix to be applied to all disturbed streambanks, extending five feet landward following construction.
Recommended application rate: 20 -25 lbs. per acre
Additionally, stream crossings will be stabilized with coir matting and the affected banks
revegetated using native woody species. In the event that restoration of the temporarily -
impacted streams occurs during the dormant season, woody plantings will likely consist of a
combination of live stake and bare root species (Table 3). In the event that restoration takes
place during the growing season, supplemental plantings will likely consist of containerized
species (Table 4).
Table 3: Live Stake and Bare Root Species*
Common name
Scientific Name
Plant Spacing
Silky dogwood
Corpus amomum
2 feet on center
Ninebark
Physocarpos opulifolius
3 feet on center
Carolina willow
Salix caroliniana
1 foot on center
Black willow
Salix nigra
1 foot on center
Silky willow
Salix sericea
2 feet on center
Elderberry
Sambucus canadensis
3 feet on center
Coral Berry
Symphoricarpos orbiculata
2 feet on center
'For use when planting during the dormant season. Select at least three of the listed species.
Table 4: Containerized Species*
Common Name
Scientific Name
Plant Spacing
Tag alder
Alnus serrulta
5 feet on center
Ironwood
Carpinus caroliniana
10 feet on center
Persimmon
Diospyros virginiana
20 feet on center
Redbud
Cercis canadensis
10 feet on center
Willow oak
Quercus phellos
20 feet on center
'For use when planting during the growing season. Select at least two of the listed species.
Substitutions to the species identified in Tables 3 and 4 may be made based on availability
and approval of an S &ME Botanist.
2

Restoration Plan SWE project No. 1357 -11 -005
PNG Huntersville Strengthening Protect December 17, 2012
Restoration Plan Prepared By:
S &ME, Inc.
9711 Southern Pine Blvd.
Charlotte, N.C. 28273
704.523.4726
Contact: Joey Lawler, P.W.S.
jlawlergsmeinc. com
Local Suppliers of native seed and plant material:
Mellow Marsh Farm
1312 Woody Store Road
Siler City, N.C. 27344
919.742.1200
919.742.1280 fax
www.mellowmarshfarm.com
Natives
550 East Westinghouse Boulevard
Charlotte, N.C. 28273
688.527.1177
688.527.1133
plants plantnative.net
3