20110162 Ver 2_401 Application_20130613

.11 CWS
li�j I
Carolina Wetland Services, Inc.
550 East Westinghouse Boulevard
Charlotte, NC 28273
704 -527 -1177 - Phone
704 -527 -1133 - Fax
TO: Ms. Karen Higgins
NCDWQ — Wetlands and Storm Water Branch
512 N Salisbury St
9th Floor Archdale Building
Raleigh NC 27603
Date: 06 -25 -13
CWS Project #: 2008 -2256
i
LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL
WE ARE SENDING YOU: ®Attached ❑Under separate cover via the following items:
❑ Prints ® Plans ® JD Package ❑ Specifications
❑ Copy of letter ❑ Change order ❑ Wetland Survey ® Other
IF ENCLOSURES ARE NOT AS NOTED, KINDLY NOTIFY US AT ONCE
Cowl ° ` I0�
� U� 11703
5
Application for WQC No. 3885
1
6/24/13
2
6/24/13
Cowl ° ` I0�
� U� 11703
5
Application for WQC No. 3885
1
Application Fee Check ($570)
THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below:
[]For approval []Approved as submitted []Resubmit copies for approval
®For your use ❑Approved as noted ❑Submit copies for distribution
❑As requested ❑Retumed for corrections ❑Return corrected prints
❑For review and comment ❑For your verification and signature
REMARKS: Karen. Please find attached five copies of the Preconstruction Notification and application for Water
Quality Certification for the Cherokee Scotland CIP in Charlotte NC A check for the application fee is also attached
Copy to: File
Thank you,
LY p as Blackwell, PWS
Senior Scientist
NORTH CAROLINA - SOUTH CAROLINA

• Corps Submittal Cover Sheet 1 `_ 0 1 �;L. V a-
Please provide the following info:
1.
Project Name
Cherokee Scotland CIP
2.
Name of Property Owner/Applicant:_
Charlotte Mecklenburg Storm Water Services (CMSWS)
3.
Name of Consultant/Agent:
Carolina Wetland Services,
Inc. Mr. Gregg Antemann, PWS
*Agent authorization needs to be attached.
4.
Related/Previous Action ID number(s):
SAW 2011 -00369
5.
Site Address: Cherokee Road and Scotland Avenue, Charlotte, NC
6.
Subdivision Name: N/A
f
7.
City: Charlotte
8.
County: Mecklenburg
9.
Lat: N35.19305° Long:
W80.822180
(Decimal Degrees Please
10. Quadrangle Name: Charlotte East,
dated 1991
11. Waterway: UT to Briar Creek
12.
Watershed: Catawba (HU# 03050103)
13. Requested Action:
X Nationwide Permit # 3 & 27
General Permit #
Jurisdictional Determination Request
Pre - Application Request
The following information will be completed by Corps office:
AID:
Prepare File Folder Assign number in ORM Begin Date
Authorization: Section 10 Section 404
Project Description/ Nature of Activity/ Project Purpose:
Site/Waters Name:
Keywords:

CWS
Carolina Wetland Services
June 25, 2013
Ms. Amanda Fuemmeler
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
151 Patton Avenue, Room 208
Asheville, NC 28801
550 E WESTINGHOUSE BLVD.
CHARLOTTE, NC 28273
866 -527- 1177(office)
704- 527 -1133 (fax)
Ms. Karen Higgins
NCDWQ — Wetlands and Stormwater Branch
512 N Salisbury St
9th Floor Archdale Building
Raleigh NC 27603
Subject: Resubmittal of Pre - Construction Notification (Nationwide Permit Nos. 3 & 27)
Water Quality Certification No. 3883 and 3885
Cherokee Scotland CIP
Charlotte, North Carolina
Carolina Wetland Services Project No. 2008 -2256
The Cherokee Scotland Capital Improvements Project (CIP) is located in the Eastover district of
Charlotte, between Providence Road and Briar Creek (Figure 1. USGS Site Location Map, attached).
The purpose of this project is to improve the storm drainage infrastructure and alleviate flooding
within the neighborhood. On behalf of Charlotte- Mecklenburg Storm Water Services (CMSWS),
Dewberry, Inc. has contracted Carolina Wetland Services, Inc. (CWS) to provide Section 404/401
permitting services for this project. This project was previously permitted on July 12, 2011 (Action
ID 2011 - 00369). This permit has now expired. Therefore, we are submitting a request for a new
permit with minor modifications from the original.
Applicant Name: Charlotte - Mecklenburg Storm Water Services, Isaac J. Hinson, PWS
Mailing Address: 600 East Fourth Street, Charlotte, NC 28202
Phone Number of Owner /Applicant: 704 - 336 -4495
Street Address of Project: Cherokee Road and Scotland Avenue, Charlotte, NC
Tax Parcel ID: N/A
Waterway: UT to Briar Creek
Basin: Catawba (HU# 03050103)
City: Charlotte
County: Mecklenburg
Decimal Degree Coordinate Location of Project Site: N35.19305 °, W80.82218 °
USGS Quadrangle Name: Charlotte East, NC, dated 1991
Current Land Use
The project area is approximately 270 acres in extent and consists of long established residential
subdivisions with maintained lawns and gardens, and small adjacent wooded areas. Typical on -site
vegetation includes sweetgum (Liquidambar styraciflua), willow oak (Quercus phellos), Chinese
privet (Ligustrum sinense), glossy privet (Ligustrum lucidum), fescue (Festuca spp.), and Japanese
NORTH CAROLINA • SOUTH CAROLINA
WWW.CWS4NC.NET

Cherokee Scotland CIP June 25, 2013
Nationwide Permit No. 3 and 27 Project No. 2008 -2256
honeysuckle (Lonicera japonica). A representative photograph of on -site vegetation has been
included as Photograph L.
According to the Soil Survey of Mecklenburg County' (Figure 2. NRCS Soil Survey Map, attached),
on -site soils consist of Cecil sandy clay loam (CeB2 and CeD2), Cecil -Urban land complex (CuB),
Helena sandy loam (HeB), and Monocan and Arents (MS). Cecil soils are well drained and Helena
soils are moderately well drained. Monocan soils are somewhat poorly drained and Arents refers to
areas where the natural soil has been disturbed with fill. Monocan and Helena soils have been listed in
the North Carolina Hydric Soils List for Mecklenburg County as having hydric inclusions2. Monacan
soils are also listed as hydric soils (hydric criteria 2133, 4) on the National Hydric Soils List3.
Jurisdictional Determination
An Approved Jurisdictional Determination was issued for this project on July 12, 2011 (Action ID 2011-
00369). This determination remains valid until July 12, 2016. A copy of the verification letter is attached.
On -Site Jurisdictional Waters of the U.S. are summarized in Table 1, below.
Table 1. Summary of On -Site Jurisdictional Waters
Project Permitting History
A Nationwide Permit No. 3 and 27 was issued for project on July 12, 2011 (Action ID 2011 - 00369).
This permit authorized pipe replacement, pipe extension, replacement/installation of rip rap, and
stream enhancement/bank stabilization activities. Impacts to stream channels authorized by this permit
totaled 149 linear feet of stream channel under NWP No. 3, and 450 linear feet of stream channel
under NWP No. 27. Previously permitted impacts are summarized in Table 2, below and are shown in
Figure 4 (attached). A copy of the permit authorizing these impacts is attached.
'United States Department of Agriculture, 1971 Sod Survey of Mecklenburg County, North Carolina
Z United States Department of Agriculture — Natural Resources Conservation Service, 1999 North Carolina Hydric Soils List, USDA -
NRCS North Carolina State Office, Raleigh
3 United States Department of Agriculture —Natural Resources Conservation Service, 2010 2010 National Hydric Sods List by State
2
Jurisdiction
NCDWQ
USACE
Approx.
Jurisdictional
SCP
Stream
Stream
Length
Approx.
USACE/EPA
Intermittent/
Feature
No.
Classification
Assessment
linear
Acreage
Rapanos
Perennial
Score
Score
feet (If)
(ac.)
Classification
Perennial
SCP 1
Stream A
RPW
Perennial
and
31 and 36
46 and 51
3,359
0.502
SCP3
Stream B
Seasonal RPW
Important
SCP 2
26.5
38
51
0.006
Intermittent
On -Site Total:
3,410
0.508
Project Permitting History
A Nationwide Permit No. 3 and 27 was issued for project on July 12, 2011 (Action ID 2011 - 00369).
This permit authorized pipe replacement, pipe extension, replacement/installation of rip rap, and
stream enhancement/bank stabilization activities. Impacts to stream channels authorized by this permit
totaled 149 linear feet of stream channel under NWP No. 3, and 450 linear feet of stream channel
under NWP No. 27. Previously permitted impacts are summarized in Table 2, below and are shown in
Figure 4 (attached). A copy of the permit authorizing these impacts is attached.
'United States Department of Agriculture, 1971 Sod Survey of Mecklenburg County, North Carolina
Z United States Department of Agriculture — Natural Resources Conservation Service, 1999 North Carolina Hydric Soils List, USDA -
NRCS North Carolina State Office, Raleigh
3 United States Department of Agriculture —Natural Resources Conservation Service, 2010 2010 National Hydric Sods List by State
2

Cherokee Scotland CIP June 25, 2013
Nationwide Permit No. 3 and 27 Proiect No. 2008 -2256
Table 2. Summary of Previously Permitted Impacts to On -Site Jurisdictional Waters
Jurisdictional
Feature
Intermittent
I Perennial
Impact Type
NWP
No
Temporary 1 Permanent
Temp
Approximate
Len th I
Approx.
Acreage
Bank Stabilization
banks only)
3
6 If
Net Impact Permanent
N/A
Pipe Extension
3
33 If (Permanent)
0.005
Perennial
RPW Stream
A
Perennial
Pipe Extension
3
62 If (Permanent)
0.011
Rip rap apron
3
48 If (Permanent)
0.008
Enhancement (bankfull
benching and live staking)
27
450 If (Temporary)
N/A
Stream Impacts (Total)
599 If
0.024 acre
Stream Impacts (Temporary)
450 If
N/A
Stream Impacts (Permanent)
149 If
0.024 acre
Unfortunately it was not possible to begin construction of the project prior to the expiration of this
permit on March 18, 2012.
Additional Impacts
The proposed pipe extension, as originally permitted for the Cherokee - Scotland CIP, terminated at the
rear of the house at 1425 Scotland Avenue. The previously permitted Cherokee - Scotland CIP (Action
ID 2011 - 00369) proposed to replace the existing 96 -inch corrugated metal pipe (CMP) at 1417
Scotland Avenue with a double barreled pipe consisting of two 8' x 6' reinforced concrete box culverts
(RCBC), and extend the pipe system downstream by 62 linear feet. A 48 linear foot rip rap apron at
the pipe outlet was also permitted. The purpose of the Cherokee - Scotland CIP is to improve the storm
drainage infrastructure and alleviate flooding within the neighborhood. The culvert extension
associated with the Cherokee - Scotland CIP was limited to that length necessary to fulfill the flood
alleviation goals of the project and to protect the foundations of the house at 1425 Scotland Avenue.
However, the property owner at 1425 Scotland Avenue has since expressed serious safety concerns
regarding the location of the pipe terminus at the rear of his property. The property owner has
requested that the pipe system be extended downstream by 34 linear feet to improve safety for the
residents of 1425 Scotland Avenue.
The previously permitted double 8' x 6'RCBC at the rear of 1417 and 1425 Scotland Avenue will be
extended downstream by 34 linear feet (Plan Sheets 6.2 and 6.3, attached). The extension of this pipe is
necessary to improve safety at 1425 Scotland Avenue. The previously permitted 48 linear foot rip rap
apron will be relocated to the downstream end of the proposed pipe extension. This rip rap apron is
necessary to dissipate the energy of the water exiting the pipe. Figure 5 (attached) shows the currently
proposed project impacts. The additional impacts to on -site jurisdictional waters that are being
requested are summarized in Table 3, below.

Cherokee Scotland CIP June 25, 2013
Nationwide Permit No. 3 and 27 Project No. 2008 -2256
Table 3. Summary of Proposed Additional Impacts to On -Site Jurisdictional Waters
Jurisdictional
Intermittent
NWP
Temporary / Permanent
Temp
Approx.
Feature
1 Perennial
Impact Type
No
Approximate
Acreage
Len th I
Perennial
RPW Stream
Perennial
Pipe Extension
3
34 ff (Permanent)
0.007
A
Stream Impacts (Additional)
1 3411' 10.007
acre
Purpose and Need for Additional Impacts
The purpose of the additional impacts requested is to extend downstream, by 34 linear feet, the double
8' x 6' RCBC previously permitted under the Cherokee - Scotland CIP. The previously permitted 48
linear foot rip rap apron will be relocated downstream of the pipe extension (Plan Sheet 6.2, attached).
The primary purpose of extending the pipe relates to (i) safety concerns and (ii) the extremely close
proximity of the original proposed headwall and open channel to the back of the residence, which
would have the effect of destroying the residential nature of the property. By extending the pipe as
requested, safety concerns can be reduced. Furthermore, because the existing channel moves at an
angle away from the residential structures on the east side of Scotland Avenue, the project would not
have the effect of destroying the residential character of the property or the residential character of the
neighboring property.
Safety Concerns
The homeowners have five grandchildren whose ages range from three to ten, and for whom the
proposed open channel poses significant safety concerns. In addition, the neighborhood is not fenced
off. Consequently, other children in the neighborhood are accustomed to using the back yard of 1425
Scotland Avenue as a play area and short cut to other streets in the neighborhood. The homeowner
believes the extraordinary width and steepness of the open channel, particularly at the headwall, pose a
grave danger to young children who may be tempted to venture down the sides or who may fall
accidentally into the open channel. There will be a sheer drop of over ten feet at the headwall which is
currently proposed to be located immediately to the rear of the residence.
Effect on Property Value
In an email dated April 19, 2013, Mr. Shoemaker stated that, without the proposed pipe extension the
City's Cherokee Scotland CIP, "...would have a devastating effect on our property value. We do not
envision anyone (with or without children/grandchildren) purchasing our home after the project is
constructed unless the requested extension is approved. Without the extension of the pipe, our
property would be viewed as extremely hazardous to anyone looking to purchase a residential structure
and we do not envision anyone would find it suitable for residential use. Extending the pipe would
result in our property having a grass covered back yard for most of its width and as such it would
present a significantly reduced safety risk and it would preserve the most of the residential nature of
the property. For those reasons, while we believe there would be an adverse impact to our property
value even with the requested extension of the pipe, we believe the adverse effect would be much
less ". The negative effects on the value of the property can be significantly mitigated by moving the
headwall away from the rear of the house as proposed by this project.
0

Cherokee Scotland CIP June 25, 2013
Nationwide Permit No. 3 and 27 Project No. 2008 -2256
Avoidance and Minimization
The proposed extension does not go all the way to the property line. Instead, the new headwall will be
located approximately 15 feet short of the property line. Because of the angle of the channel, that
would move the culvert headwall further away from the residence and allow the property owner to
develop a safety plan for the headwall that would not destroy the residential character of the property.
The option of fencing the headwall in -situ was examined. This option was determined to be unfeasible
for the following reasons. No fence would be completely effective to keep out children who are
determined to explore or get into the open channel. In addition, any fence that could be designed with
safety in mind would likely make the property lose its residential character entirely if installed so close
to the house. By moving the headwall downstream closer to the property line, more substantial safety
measures could be installed without the loss of the residential character of the property.
The option of using a bottomless culvert was examined and discounted due to the excessive cost of this
option. A bottomless culvert of sufficient size would cost over $100,000 more than the proposed
option. This is cost prohibitive for the property owner who is self funding this project.
Adjacent Property Owner Permission
The City of Charlotte holds a drainage easement on the stream channel downstream of 1425 Scotland
Avenue. A copy of the easement option document is attached.
Total Proposed Impacts to Jurisdictional Waters of the U.S.
The overall project will involve the replacement of existing pipe systems, pipe extension, replacement
of existing rip rap aprons, and stream enhancement. Stream A downstream of 1425 Scotland Avenue
will be enhanced by laying back the banks and installing live - stakes on the banks to provide improved
bank stability (Plan Sheet 6.2, attached). The length of the proposed stream enhancement has been
reduced to easement acquisition issues.
Unavoidable impacts to Jurisdictional Waters of the U.S. total 440 linear feet of stream impacts. These
impacts include 183 linear feet of permanent impacts and 257 linear feet of temporary impacts (Figure 5,
attached). Unavoidable impacts to jurisdictional waters of the U.S. are summarized in Table 4, below.

Cherokee Scotland CIP June 25, 2013
Nationwide Permit No. 3 and 27 Project No. 2008 -2256
Table 4. Total Proposed Impacts to On -Site Jurisdictional Waters
On behalf of CMSWS, CWS is submitting a Pre- Construction Notification Application with attachments
in accordance with Nationwide Permit General Condition No. 31, and pursuant to Nationwide Permit
Nos. 3 and 27 (enclosed).
Compensatory Mitigation
The project, as originally proposed and permitted, had a total of 149 linear feet of permanent stream
impacts. Therefore, compensatory mitigation was not originally required for this project. Based on
email correspondence (attached) and telephone conversations, with Ms. Amanda Fuemmeler of the
USACE and Mr. Alan Johnson of the NCDWQ, mitigation will only be required for the additional
impacts that are being added to the previously permitted project at the behest of the property owner of
1425 Scotland Avenue. CMSWS proposes to mitigate at a 1:1 ratio for the 34 linear feet of additional
permanent impacts through a credit purchase from the Charlotte Umbrella Stream and Wetland
Mitigation Bank ( "Umbrella Bank "). The resident at 1425 Scotland Avenue will reimburse CMSWS
for the mitigation cost: This mitigation proposal was reached in accordance with correspondence
between CMSWS, the USACE, and NCDWQ (email attached). A letter of acceptance from the
Umbrella Bank is attached.
6
Temporary 1
Jurisdictional
Intermittent
Impact Type
Plan
Station
NWP
Permanent
Approx.
Feature
I Perennial
Sheet
No.
No.
Approximate
Acreage
Length(f) I
Bank
16 +74
61f
Stabilization
6.5
to
3
Net Impact
N/A
(banks only)
16 +80
(Permanent)
Pipe
10 +58
Extens on
6.3
to
3
(Permanent)
0.005
10 +91
Pipe
6.3 &
6 +12
96 If
Perennial
RPW Stream
Perennial
Extension
6.2
to
3
(Permanent)
0.018
A
7 +08
5 +64
Rip rap apron
6.2
to
3
48 If (Permanent)
0.008
6 +12
Enhancement
3 +07
(bank grading
6.2
to
27
257 If
N/A
and live
5+64
(Temporary)
staking)
Stream
Impacts (Total)
440 If
0.031 acre
Stream Impacts (Temporary)
257 If
N/A
Stream Impacts (Permanent)
183 If
0.031 acre
On behalf of CMSWS, CWS is submitting a Pre- Construction Notification Application with attachments
in accordance with Nationwide Permit General Condition No. 31, and pursuant to Nationwide Permit
Nos. 3 and 27 (enclosed).
Compensatory Mitigation
The project, as originally proposed and permitted, had a total of 149 linear feet of permanent stream
impacts. Therefore, compensatory mitigation was not originally required for this project. Based on
email correspondence (attached) and telephone conversations, with Ms. Amanda Fuemmeler of the
USACE and Mr. Alan Johnson of the NCDWQ, mitigation will only be required for the additional
impacts that are being added to the previously permitted project at the behest of the property owner of
1425 Scotland Avenue. CMSWS proposes to mitigate at a 1:1 ratio for the 34 linear feet of additional
permanent impacts through a credit purchase from the Charlotte Umbrella Stream and Wetland
Mitigation Bank ( "Umbrella Bank "). The resident at 1425 Scotland Avenue will reimburse CMSWS
for the mitigation cost: This mitigation proposal was reached in accordance with correspondence
between CMSWS, the USACE, and NCDWQ (email attached). A letter of acceptance from the
Umbrella Bank is attached.
6

Cherokee Scotland CIP June 25, 2013
Nationwide Permit No. 3 and 27 Proiect No. 2008 -2256
Please do not hesitate to contact me at 704 -527 -1177 or tom @cws- inc.net should you have any
questions or comments regarding these findings.
Sincerely,
L'10'&a 4re�Antemann, / —
Thomas J. Blackwell, PWS PWS
Senior Scientist Principal Scientist
Enclosures: Figure 1. USGS 7.5' Charlotte East, NC Topographic Quadrangles
Figure 2. NRCS Mecklenburg County Soil Survey
Figure 3. Approximate Jurisdictional Boundary Field Map
Figure 4. Originally Permitted Impacts
Figure 5. Proposed Impacts
Agent Authorization Form
Pre - Construction Notification Pursuant to Nationwide Permit No. 3 and 27
Agency Correspondence
Letter of Acceptance from Charlotte Umbrella Mitigation Bank
Construction Plans
cc: Mr. Chris Fleck, Dewberry
Mr. Isaac Hinson, CMSWS
File
7

Cherokee- Scotland CIP Date:June 24, 2013
Nationwide Permit No. 3 and 27 CWS Project No. 2008 -2256
,n�>e_ .�
. W f
wN
WkWJ,.�1
Are N
91 Ho! tt -
J
K '
�.F 1 t_
\, • !�° 1 Providence Road (NC 16) � Fus . _ _-•- ." /, � ! n„ -
Mr
j - .r,,,.__ ECherpM.ee Road
rne- Park
Al(K AVE
z%
" t .
Scotland Avenue 4 7 1(
:i`
r
t,
7j Ile
Xr o .s p Project Linmtsl �canv ac�PF cs Ro
ark
y
y6 ,Y` Ile
p % Q v." m ,
_ •' y ""a . � � gyp,
e I
�- ,t r 41 �`�-. "^ r ,1 \j! Cr �!^J.��`� A s Asa. . ? •` �e
YN
ai� y. tvV2 -"°" 1! .•// chi '•'� i f �\'~v �• -.
s
.. i
hfi:Z 'Q1?F tiA nfi � r � • ! C 5. •tis'~� '��'�.
31 8 ' pR
Cod � � :� �� �� •yiy t(y[ • C.
o sr. _ •✓ �C ,r„'1 r �* '3
e
a.
!
Figure 1. USGS Site Location Map
7.5 Minute Topographic Map Series, Charlotte East, North Carolina, dated 1991.
Approximate Scale F'= 2000'

Cherokee- Scotland CIP December 14, 2010
Nationwide Permit No. 3 and 27 CWS Proiect No. 2008 -2256
Ur i
MS CUB
MS
a
co
Ur
': Ur
CuB C[A r
,i Cub )
P aE
CuB � C� MS
iv
�Y
W
MS CuB
Cub
CeQ2 Y
P of t Limits (area
� Ceb2
7�
lr wkB CuB
CeB2
l ?2 MS
Ge Z77 tip% MO C,rQ7
3 _
U, / i . wkD
MI,B
O
CeB2 (,e82
10 0.k8
Cu0
CuB
M j MkB 04!82
cjp
n
„. uB
EnI)
MkB
C uB
CuD TWkE MkB
/ Y
M1 !�
MO 'E nD `. 4
MkB eB
Cub l CUD MeD
MkB , t1uB
CUD t CUD
HuE
x (?ufl
Hi
1
J
Cub
Cut) .-- � ( „uB
Ce82
y Hr8
t WhE
IWV E Ce8l
MkB 1. Ur
y, Ce82
Ce82
Figure 2. USDA -NRCS Soil Survey of Mecklenburg County
NRCS soil Survey of Mecklenburg County. North Carolina. Sheet Number 7, Dated 1976.
Approximate Scale V = 2000'

al m
O
1
CD
7771-0
M rreviousiy rermittea impacts
mph
C
aCherokee - Scotland CIP
Charlotte, North Carolina
CWS Project No. 2008 -2256
d C O
w
C X W
�p
0 u
CL
a CL
y
N
�
fn �
N
w
3
0
w
a
m
I�
SCALE: 1": 250,
DATE:
06 -17 -13
�� --..
ws
CWS PROJECT NO:
DRAWN BY:
TJB
2008 -2256
C
APPLICANT NO:
CHECKED BY:
/+/+ n
WWW,CWS- /NC.NET
V lr/`1

m W o X 0 3
i a a 3 3 a C.
® N 7 V)
cc co 7 fl
O N C Q n
N
1
N
3
n
r.*. d
CD
CD
SCALE: 1 250, DATE: 06-17-13
Proposed Impacts 'Lv L" L CWS CWS PROJECT NOOH-2256 DRAWN BY. TJ B
z Cherokee - Scotland CIP Z O Celpkne WeWlel Servrsa
Charlotte, North Carolina APPLICANT NO: CHECKED BY'. Gr+A
CWS Project No. 2008 -2256 WWW.CWS- /NC.NET V VV

AGENT CERTIFICATION OF AUTHORIZATION
I, Mr. Isaac Hinson, representing Charlotte Mecklenburg Storm Water Services, hereby
certify that I have authorized Gregg Antemann and Carolina Wetland Services, Inc. to act
on my behalf and take all actions necessary to the processing, issuance, and acceptance of
this request for wetlands determination / permitting and any and all standard and special
conditions attached.
We hereby certify that the above information submitted in this application is true and
accurate to the best of our knowledge.
Applicant's signature
06/24/2013
Date
C. ; -
Agent's signature
06/24/2013
Date
Completion of this form will allow the agent to sign all future application correspondence.

C. �
o <
Office Use Only:
Corps action ID no.
DWQ project no.
Form Version 1.3 Dec 10 2008
Pre - Construction Notification PCN Form
A. Applicant Information
1. Processing
1 a. Type(s) of approval sought from the
Corps:
®Section 404 Permit E] Section 10 Permit
1 b. Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number: 3 and 27 or General Permit (GP) number:
1c. Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps?
❑ Yes
® No
1d. Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply):
® 401 Water Quality Certification — Regular ❑ Non -404 Jurisdictional General Permit
❑ 401 Water Quality Certification — Express ❑ Riparian Buffer Authorization
le. Is this notification solely for the record
because written approval is not required?
For the record only for DWQ 401
Certification:
❑ Yes ® No
For the record only for Corps Permit:
❑ Yes ® No
1f. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for mitigation
of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank or in -lieu
fee program.
® Yes
❑ No
1g. Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties. If yes, answer 1h
below.
❑ Yes
® No
1h. Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)?
[:]Yes
® No
2. Project Information
2a. Name of project:
Cherokee Scotland CIP
2b. County:
Mecklenburg
2c. Nearest municipality / town:
Charlotte
2d. Subdivision name:
Eastover
2e. NCDOT only, T.I.P. or state
project no:
N/A
3. Owner Information
3a. Name(s) on Recorded Deed:
3b. Deed Book and Page No.
3c. Responsible Party (for LLC if
applicable):
3d. Street address:
3e. City, state, zip:
3f. Telephone no.:
3g. Fax no.:
3h. Email address:
Page 1 of 13
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

4. Applicant Information (if different from owner)
4a. Applicant is:
❑ Agent ® Other, specify: Charlotte Mecklenburg Storm Water Services
4b. Name:
POC Mr. Isaac Hinson
4c. Business name
(if applicable):
Charlotte Mecklenburg Storm Water Services
4d. Street address:
600 East Fourth Street
4e. City, state, zip:
Charlotte, NC 28202
4f. Telephone no.:
(704) 336 -4495
4g. Fax no.:
(704) 336 -6586
4h. Email address:
ihinson @charlottenc.gov
5. Agent/Consultant Information (if applicable)
5a. Name:
Gregg Antemann, PWS
5b. Business name
(if applicable):
Carolina Wetland Services, Inc.
5c. Street address:
550 E. Westinghouse Blvd.
5d. City, state, zip:
Charlotte, NC 28273
5e. Telephone no.:
704- 527 -1177
5f. Fax no.:
704- 527 -1133
5g. Email address:
gregg@cws- inc.net
Page 2 of 13
PCN Form —Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

B. Project Information and Prior Project History
1. Property Identification
1a. Property identification no. (tax PIN or parcel ID):
Multiple
1 b. Site coordinates (in decimal degrees):
Latitude: 35.19305 Longitude: - 80.82218
(DD.DDDDDD) ( -DD DDDDDD)
1 c. Property size:
270 acres
2. Surface Waters
2a. Name of nearest body of water (stream, river, etc.) to
proposed project:
Briar Creek
2b. Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water:
Class C
2c. River basin:
Santee (HU# 03050103)
Page 3 of 13
PCN Form —Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

3. Project Description
3a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this
application:
The project area is approximately 270 acres in extent and consists of long established residential subdivisions with
maintained lawns and gardens, and small adjacent wooded areas. Typical on -site vegetation includes sweetgum
(Liquidambar styraciflua), willow oak (Quercus phelos), Chinese privet (Ligustrum sinense), glossy privet (Ligustrum
lucidum), fescue (Festuca spp.), and Japanese honeysuckle (Lonicera japonica).
3b. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property:
0
3c. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property:
3,410 linear feet of perennial stream channel
3d. Explain the purpose of the proposed project:
The purpose and need for this project is to alleviate flooding and erosion issues within the project limits. The need for these
repairs was identified through the 336 -RAIN call database maintained by the City of Charlotte. The 336 -RAIN call
database is a telephone hotline where citizens of the City of Charlotte and Mecklenburg County can call in and report
storm water requests or ask general storm water related questions. Typical storm water requests include maintenance
and repair requests, flooding, and other storm water issues. Each call is given a priority rating (by a City-County
representative), A through C, with A being the highest priority. Calls may also be logged as ADM (administrative
requests), DNQ (call does not qualify for service), and /or U (undefined).
The 336 -RAIN database contains a total of two hundred and four (204) calls within the project study area that have been
made from one hundred twenty-two (122) unique addresses. Two or more calls were made from forty -one (41)
addresses. One hundred nine (109) of the total two hundred and four (204) calls pertain to either flooding or erosion
problems, whereas the remaining calls are for a variety of requests or administrative issues. Of the total number of calls,
thirty -four (34) are indicated as being "open" (i.e. unresolved) requests, whereas, the others are closed and have been
resolved.
As indicated above, there have been a large number of calls made for a variety of requests, however, the majority of the
requests are related to flooding and /or erosion. A map taken from a planning report prepared for the project has been
attached as Figure 4. This map shows the locations of both citizen questionnaire responses and 336 -RAIN calls within
the project area. Inspection of the call records revealed that flooding due to clogged or blocked storm drains has been
one of the most common service requests. Many of these requests were resolved by the City through the clearing of
blockages. Sink holes from blowouts or leaking system pipes /structures were also noted in many of the calls. These
issues were often resolved through repair and /or replacement of deteriorated systems. Tree roots were identified in
several of these calls as the cause of the damage. Overall, 1993, 1995, 1997, 1998, and 2003 resulted in a large number
of calls concerning flooding, most severely from Perrin Place and Middleton Drive. These years are coincident with years
in which Charlotte received large storm events.Of the thirty -four (34) RAINS requests which are listed as being "open"
(i.e. unresolved), twenty-four (24) of the requests relate to eleven properties within close proximity to the proposed
drainage improvements. The open RAINS requests relate to erosion (9 requests), street and property flooding (7
requests), and blockages (5 requests). There are also three general storm water inquiry requests. One property, 1417
Scotland Avenue is classified as 'Priority A' for erosion, and one property (708 Cherokee Road) is classified as 'Priority B'
for flooding. Other properties with open requests are classified as 'Priority C' or 'Undefined'. These properties include
728 Cherokee Road (erosion), 1118 Scotland Avenue (erosion), 1134 Scotland Avenue (erosion), 1609 Scotland Avenue
(blockage), 1613 Scotland Avenue (blockage), 1623 Scotland Avenue (blockage), 1620 Twiford Place (erosion and
flooding), 1126 Providence Road (flooding), and 2533 Hampton Avenue (flooding).
Flooding and erosion problems within the project area have been reported by neighborhood residents and are documented in
formal responses to City questionnaires and service requests. The purpose of this project is to reduce flooding, dissipate
high velocity storm flows at outfalls, and reduce storm - induced erosion downstream of culverts. In addition, the project
will stabilize and enhance the stream channel downstream of 1417 Scotland Avenue through laying back of the banks
and the planting of deep rooted, native plants. This project will bring this storm water system up to city design standards
to address these issues. .
Page 4 of 13
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

3e. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
The project will involve the replacement of existing culverts, replacement of existing rip rap aprons, pipe extension, and
stream enhancement. Stream A downstream of 1425 Scotland Avenue will be enhanced by laying back the banks and
installing live stakes to provide improved bank stability (Plan Sheet 6.2, attached). This will also result in reduced
sediment input to the stream.
Existing rip rap aprons at culvert inlets and outlets will be refreshed as necessary. Where possible the new aprons have
be limited to the areas already impacted. A track hoe and other typical construction equipment will be used in the
construction of this project.
4. Jurisdictional Determinations
4a. Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the
Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property /
®Yes [I No El Unknown
project (including all prior phases) in the past?
Comments:
4b. If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination, what type
❑ preliminary ® Final
of determination was made?
4c. If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas?
Agency /Consultant Company: Carolina Wetland Services,
Name (if known): Thomas Blackwell, PWS
Inc. Other:
4d. If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation.
July 12, 2011 (Action ID 2011 - 00369)
5. Project History
5a. Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for
® Yes ❑ No ❑ Unknown
this project (including all prior phases) in the past?
5b. If yes, explain in detail according to "help file" instructions.
A Nationwide Permit No. 3 and 27 was issued for project on July 12, 2011 (Action ID 2011 - 00369). This permit
authorized pipe replacement, pipe extension, replacement/installation of rip rap, and stream enhancement/bank
stabilization activities. Impacts to stream channels authorized by this permit totaled 149 linear feet of stream channel
under NWP No. 3, and 450 linear feet of stream channel under NWP No. 27. A copy of the permit authorizing these
impacts is attached. Unfortunately it was not possible to begin construction of the project prior to the expiration of this
permit on March 18, 2012.
6. Future Project Plans
6a. Is this a phased project?
❑ Yes ® No
6b. If yes, explain.
Page 5 of 13
PCN Form —Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

C. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
1 a. Which sections were completed below for your project (check all that apply):
❑ Wetlands ® Streams - tributaries ❑ Buffers
❑ Open Waters ❑ Pond Construction
2. Wetland Impacts
If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted.
2a.
2b.
2c.
2d.
2e.
2f.
Wetland impact
Type of jurisdiction
number —
Type of impact
Type of wetland
Forested
(Corps - 404, 10
Area of impact
Permanent (P) or
(if known)
DWQ — non -404, other)
(acres)
Temporary T
W1 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes •
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
W2 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
W3 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
W4 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
W5 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
W6 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
2g. Total wetland impacts
2h. Comments:.
3. Stream Impacts
If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this
question for all stream sites impacted.
3a.
3b.
3c.
3d.
3e.
3f.
3g.
Stream impact
Type of impact
Stream name
Perennial
Type of jurisdiction
Average
Impact
number -
(PER) ) or
(Corps - 404, 10
stream
length
Permanent (P) or
intermittent
DWQ — non -404,
width
(linear
Temporary (T)
(INT)?
other)
(feet)
feet)
S1 ®P ❑ T
Bank Stabilization
Perennial RPW
® PER
® Corps
6
6
Stream A
❑ INT
❑ DWQ
S2 ®P ❑ T
Pipe Extension
Perennial RPW
® PER
® Corps
6
33
Stream A
❑ INT
❑ DWQ
S3 ®P ❑ T
Pipe Extension
Perennial RPW
® PER
® Corps
g
96
Stream A
❑ INT
❑ DWQ
S4 ®P ❑ T
Rip Rap Apron
Perennial RPW
® PER
® Corps
8
48
Stream A
❑ INT
❑ DWQ
S5 []POT
Enhancement
Perennial RPW
® PER
® Corps
8
257
Stream A
❑ INT
❑ DWQ
S6 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ PER
❑ Corps
❑ INT
❑ DWQ
3h. Total stream and tributary impacts
440
3i. Comments: Permanent Impacts to Jurisdictional Streams total 183 If (0.031 acre) of perennial stream.
Page 6 of 13
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

4. Open Water Impacts
If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of
the U.S. then individually list all open water impacts below.
4a.
Open water
impact number —
Permanent (P) or
Temporary T
4b.
Name of waterbody
(if applicable)
4c.
Type of impact
4d.
Waterbody type
4e.
Area of impact (acres)
01 ❑P ❑T
5k. Method of construction:
02 ❑P ❑T
6. Buffer Impacts (for DWQ)
If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below.
03 ❑P ❑T
below. If any impacts require miff ation then
you MUST fill out Section D
of this form.
6a.
04 ❑P ❑T
❑ Neuse
❑ Tar - Pamlico ❑ Other:
Project is in which protected basin?
4E Total open water impacts
❑ Randleman
4g. Comments:
5. Pond or Lake Construction
If pond or lake construction proposed, then complete the chart below.
5a.
Pond ID
number
5b.
Proposed use or purpose
of pond
5c.
Wetland Impacts (acres)
5d.
Stream Impacts (feet)
5e.
Upland
(acres)
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
Flooded
P1
Reason
Buffer
Zone 1 impact
Zone 2 impact
Permanent (P) or
for
P2
mitigation
(square feet)
(square feet)
Temporary T
impact
required?
5E Total
131 ❑P ❑T
El Yes
5g. Comments:
5h. Is a dam high hazard permit required?
5i. Expected pond surface area (acres):
5j. Size of pond watershed (acres):
5k. Method of construction:
6. Buffer Impacts (for DWQ)
If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below.
If yes, then individually list all buffer impacts
below. If any impacts require miff ation then
you MUST fill out Section D
of this form.
6a.
❑ Neuse
❑ Tar - Pamlico ❑ Other:
Project is in which protected basin?
❑ Catawba
❑ Randleman
6b.
6c.
6d.
6e.
6f.
6g.
Buffer impact
number —
Reason
Buffer
Zone 1 impact
Zone 2 impact
Permanent (P) or
for
Stream name
mitigation
(square feet)
(square feet)
Temporary T
impact
required?
131 ❑P ❑T
El Yes
❑ No
B2 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ No
83 ❑P ❑T
E] Yes
❑ No
6h. Total buffer impacts
6i. Comments:
Page 7 of 13
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

D. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
1a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project.
Impacts to on -site jurisdictional waters of the U.S. have been reduced to the maximum extent practicable. Proper sediment
and erosion control measures will be used to minimize disturbances to downstream waters. All work will be constructed in the
dry in accordance with Water Quality Certification No. 3883 and 3885.
Initial project designs called for extensive use of rip rap between Cherokee Road and Scotland Avenue. This would have
resulted in an unacceptably high level of impact to jurisdictional waters. An in -depth existing conditions study was carried out
to identify approaches to reduce impacts to jurisdictional waters. This study, in conjunction with detailed shear stress
calculations, led to a significant reduction in the proposed impacts for this project. Rip rap aprons have now been limited to
the areas immediately up and downstream of existing pipe systems. There are already currently serviceable rip rap aprons in
these locations. Figure 3 (attached) shows the location of existing rip rap aprons. Existing rip rap aprons at pipe inlets and
outlets will be refreshed as necessary. Wherever possible the length of new rip rap has been limited to the length of the
existing rip rap and therefore new impacts to jurisdictional waters of the U.S. have been minimized.
A new high flow bypass pipe will be installed between Scotland Drive and Colville Road (Plan Sheets 6.4 & 6.5, attached).
This 7 foot by 6 foot reinforced concrete box culvert (RCBC) will carry high water flows (in excess of bankfull flow) from
Perennial Stream A and will tie into the existing culvert just upstream of Colville Road. Bankfull stream flow will continue to be
routed through the existing pipe and open channel sections between Scotland Avenue and Colville Road. The existing pipes
and open stream channel between Scotland Avenue and Colville Road will remain in -situ with the exception of the short open
channel section immediately upstream of Colville Road. This section will be piped for safety reasons and to accommodate the
tie -in of the new proposed high flow bypass pipe. The use of a high water flow bypass pipe avoids impacting the
approximately 122 linear foot open channel section at 1301 Scotland Avenue. If a bypass pipe were not used the
approximately 122 linear foot open channel section would have been impacted by rip rap.
The proposed pipe extension at 1417 and 1425 Scotland Avenue is necessary to protect the foundation of the house at 1425
Scotland Avenue, which is currently being threatened by the stream (Plan Sheets 6.2 & 6.3, attached). Due to the potential
legal liability associated with conducting storm water improvements in such close proximity to the foundations of the property
no suitable alternative could be found to extending the pipe. An additional 34 lineer feet of culvert extension were added to the
project due to safety concerns expressed by the home owner at 1425 Scotland Avenue.
Furthermore, the project includes 257 linear feet of stream enhancement (Plan Sheets 6.1 and 6.2, attached). This
enhancement work will stabilize currently eroding stream channel and will result in a reduction in sediment input to the stream
and a net improvement in stream quality. This approach addresses the erosion issues in this portion of the channel, while
avoiding hard stabilization such as rip rap which would have resulted in stream impacts..
1 b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques.
Impacts to on -site jurisdictional waters of the U.S. have been reduced to the maximum extent practicable. Proper sediment
and erosion control measures will be used to minimize disturbances to downstream waters. All work will be constructed in the
dry in accordance with Water Quality Certification No. 3883 and 3885.
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for
® Yes ❑ No
impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State?
2b. If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply):
® DWQ ® Corps
® Mitigation bank
2c. If yes, which mitigation option will be used for this
❑Payment to in -lieu fee program
project?
❑ Permittee Responsible Mitigation
3. Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank
3a. Name of Mitigation Bank: City of Charlotte Umbrella Stream and Wetland Mitigation Bank
3b. Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter)
Type Stream
Quantity 34
Page 8 of 13
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

3c. Comments: Based on correspondence with Ms. Amanda Fuemmeler of the USACE (attached), mitigation will only be
required for the additional impacts that are being added to the previously permitted project at the behest of the property owner
of 1425 Scotland Avenue.
4. Complete if Making a Payment to In -lieu Fee Program
4a. Approval letter from in -lieu fee program is attached.
❑ Yes
4b. Stream mitigation requested:
linear feet
4c. If using stream mitigation, stream temperature:
❑ warm ❑ cool ❑cold
4d. Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only):
square feet
4e. Riparian wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4f. Non - riparian wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4g. Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested: I
acres
4h. Comments:
5. Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
5a. If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan.
6. Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) — required by DWQ
6a. Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires
buffer mitigation?
❑ Yes ❑ No
6b. If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation. Calculate the
amount of mitigation required.
Zone
6c.
Reason for impact
6d.
Total impact
(square feet)
Multiplier
6e.
Required mitigation
(square feet) -
Zone 1
3 (2 for Catawba)
Zone 2
1.5
6f. Total buffer mitigation required:
6g. If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e.g., payment to private mitigation bank,
permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in -lieu fee fund).
6h. Comments:
Page 9 of 13
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

E. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ)
1. Diffuse Flow Plan
1a. Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified
❑ Yes ® No
Within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
1 b. If yes, then is a diffuse flow plan included? If no, explain why.
❑ Yes [I No
Comments:
2. Stormwater Management Plan
2a. What is the overall percent imperviousness of this project?
N/A %
2b. Does this project require a Stormwater Management Plan?
❑ Yes ® No
2c. If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why: There is no change in inpervious area
associated with this project.
2d. If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan, then provide a brief, narrative description of the plan:
❑ Certified Local Government
2e. Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan?
❑ DWQ Stormwater Program
❑ DWQ 401 Unit
3. Certified Local Government Stormwater Review
3a. In which local government's jurisdiction is this project?
City of Charlotte
❑ Phase II
3b. Which of the following locally - implemented stormwater management programs
❑ NSW
❑ USMP
apply (check all that apply):
❑ Water Supply Watershed
❑ Other:
3c. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
❑ Yes ❑ No
attached?
4. DWQ Stormwater Program Review
❑ Coastal counties
❑ HQW
4a. Which of the following state - implemented stormwater management programs apply
❑ ORW
(check all that apply):
❑ Session Law 2006 -246
❑ Other:
4b. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
attached?
❑ Yes ❑ No
5. DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review
5a. Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements?
❑ Yes ❑ No
5b. Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met?
❑ Yes ❑ No
Page 10 of 13
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

F. Supplementary Information
1. Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement)
1 a. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal /state/local) funds or the
® Yes ❑ No
use of public (federal/state) land?
1 b. If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an
environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State
❑ Yes ® No
(North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
1 c. If you answered "yes" to the above, has the document review been finalized by the
State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval
letter.)
❑ Yes ❑ No
Comments:
2. Violations (DWQ Requirement)
2a. Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated
Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards,
❑ Yes ® No
or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 26.0200)?
2b. Is this an after - the -fact permit application?
❑ Yes ® No
2c. If you answered "yes" to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s):
3. Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement)
3a. Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in
❑ Yes ® No
additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?
3b. If you answered "yes" to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the
most recent DWQ policy. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
The project will not result in additional future development.
4. Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement)
4a. Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non- discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from
the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
N/A
Page 11 of 13
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or
❑ Yes ® No
habitat?
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act
❑ Yes ® No
impacts?
❑ Raleigh
5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted.
❑ Asheville
5d. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical
Habitat?
A letter was forwarded to the North Carolina Natural Heritage Program ( NCNHP) on November 15, 2010 to determine the
presence of any federally - listed, candidate endangered, threatened species or critical habitat located within the project
area. Ina response letter dated November 24, 2010, the NCNHP stated that "The Natural Heritage Program has no
record of rare species, significant natural communities, or significant natural heritage areas within a mile of the project
area ". A copy of the NCNHP response letter is attached. In addition, the NCNHP Geographic Information Systems (GIS)
database Virtual Workroom and Element Occurrence (EO) database was reviewed for a listing of EOs of endangered or
threatened species within or near the project area. The EO database identified no endangered or threatened species
within a 1.5 -mile radius of the project area.
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat?
❑ Yes ® No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat?
NOAA Fisheries: http: / /sharpfin. nmfs .noaa.govtwebsite /EFH_Mapper /map.aspx
Page 12 of 13
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal
governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation
❑ Yes ® No
status (e.g., National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in
North Carolina history and archaeology)?
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?
The project is located within the historic Eastover neighborhood. CWS consulted the Charlotte Mecklenburg Historic
Landmarks Commission database and found a number of listed properties within and on the periphery of the project area.
Since the purpose of this project is to improve drainage and protect properties within the project area. This project will
have no negative impacts on any historic properties within the project area. Furthermore the proposed drainage
improvements do not occur close to any listed properties.
A letter was forwarded to the State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO) on November 15, 2010 to determine the
presence of any areas of architectural, historic, or archaeological significance that would be affected by the project. In a
response letter dated November 24, 2010 (attached), the SHPO stated "According to our records Archaeological Site
31 MK259 is either located in or immediately adjacent to your proposed project area. We therefore recommend that this
site be relocated and archaeologically tested to determine its National Register of Historic Places eligibility prior to any
earth moving activities ". The SHPO also stated that "Work confined to the existing public rights -of -way will not adversely
affect the historic properties, but further review will be necessary if any work is proposed outside of the existing public
rights -of -way ". In a letter dated February 8, 2011, CWS provided SHPO with additional information regarding the project,
including detailed maps showing the location of proposed soil disturbing activities and detailed construction plans for the
project. These drawings and plans show that the area of the proposed drainage improvement activities is confined to a
very small portion of the original project study area. Furthermore, a large majority of the proposed improvements are
located in public roadway rights -of -way. In a second response letter dated February 25, 2011, the SHPO stated that,
"Based on the information contained in your recent letter regarding the scope of the project and the previous ground
disturbing activities in the project area, we are withdrawing our (North Carolina Office of State Archaeology) request that a
comprehensive archaeological survey be conducted at the above noted project locale. Although previously recorded
prehistoric archaeological site 31 MK259 is situated within the corridor, given the amount and scope of previous earth
moving activity associated with residential home construction in and around the project area the likelihood that significant,
intact archaeological resources are present is nil." The letter also stated that, "Based upon the additional information
supplied, the proposed project will have no adverse effect upon historic properties!
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA- designated 100 -year floodplain? —To—Yes
❑ No
8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements: A portion of the project area is located within the floodplain of Briar
Creek. There is no channel work proposed for this area and there will be no fill placed within the regulated floodplain.
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination? Mecklenburg County GIS
Mr. Gregg Antemann, PWS
C
06 -25 -13
Applicant/Agent's Printed Name
Applicant/AgenYs Signature
Date
(Agents signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant
is provided.)
Page 13 of 13
PCN Form –Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

U.S. ARMY COIFS OF ENGINEERS
WILMINGTON DISTRICT
Action ID. 2011 -00369 County: Mecklenburg USGS Quad: Charlotte East
GENERAL PERMIT (REGIONAL AND NATIONWIDE) VERIFICATION
Property Owner / Authorized Agent: Charlotte- Mecklenburg Storm Water Services
Attn: Isaac Hinson
Address: 600 East Fourth Street
Charlotte, NC 28202
Telephone No.: 704 -336 -4495
Size and location of property (water body, road name /number, town, etc.): The Cherokee Scotland CIP
is located along Cherokee Road and Scotland Avenue, in Charlotte, Mecklenburg County, North
Carolina.
Description of projects area and activity: This permit authorizes pipe replacement, pipe extension,
replacement/installation of rip rap, and stream enhancement/bank stabilization activities. Impacts
to stream channels authorized total 149 linear feet of stream channel under NWP #3 and 450 linear
feet under NWP #27.
Applicable Law: ® Section 404 (Clean Water Act, 33 USC 1344)
❑ Section 10 (Rivers and Harbors Act, 33 USC 403)
Authorization: Regional General Permit Number:
Nationwide Permit Number: 03 and 27
Your work is authorized by the above referenced permit provided it is accomplished in strict accordance with the
attached conditions and your submitted plans. Any violation of the attached conditions or deviation from your
submitted plans may subject the permittee to a stop work order, a restoration order and/or appropriate legal action.
This verification is valid until the NWP is modified, reissued, or revoked. All of the existing NWPs are
scheduled to be modified, reissued, or revoked prior to March 18, 2012. It is incumbent upon you to remain
informed of changes to the NWPs. We will issue a public notice when the NWPs are reissued. Furthermore, if you
commence or are under contract to commence this activity before the date that the relevant nationwide permit is
modified or revoked, you will have twelve (12) months from the date of the modification or revocation of the NWP
to complete the activity under the present terms and conditions of this nationwide permit.
Activities subject to Section 404 (as indicated above) may also require an individual Section 401 Water Quality
Certification. You should contact the NC Division of Water Quality (telephone [phone]) to determine
Section 401 requirements.
For activities occurring within the twenty coastal counties subject to regulation under the Coastal Area
Management Act (CAMA), prior to beginning work you must contact the N.C. Division of Coastal Management.
This Department of the Army verification does not relieve the permittee of the responsibility to obtain any other
required Federal, State or local approvaWpermits.
If there are any questions regarding this verification, any of the conditions of the Permit, or the Corps of
Engineers regulatory program, please contact Amanda Jones at 828 - 271 -7980.
Corps Regulatory Official Amanda Jones Date: July 12, 2011
Expiration Date of Verification: March 18, 2012

Determination of Jurisdiction:
A. ❑ Based on preliminary information, there appear to be waters of the US including wetlands within the above
described project area. This preliminary determination is not an appealable action under the Regulatory
Program Administrative Appeal Process ( Reference 33 CFR Part 331).
B. ❑ There are Navigable Waters of the United States within the above described project area subject to the
permit requirements of Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act and Section 404 of the Clean Water Act.
Unless there is a change in the law or our published regulations, this determination may be relied upon for a
period not to exceed five years from the date of this notification.
C. ® There are waters of the US and/or wetlands within the above described project area subject to the permit
requirements of Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (CWA)(33 USC § 1344). Unless there is a change in the
law or our published regulations, this determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years
from the date of this notification.
D. ❑ The jurisdictional areas within the above described project area have been identified under a previous action.
Please reference jurisdictional determination issued . Action ID
Basis of Jurisdictional Determination:
There are stream channels located on the property that exhibit indicators of ordinary high water marks. The stream
channel on the property is an unnamed tributary to Briar Creek which flows into the Catawba River. The Catawba
River is located in the Santee watershed and eventually drains to the Atlantic Ocean. Specifically, the Catawba River
joins the Santee - Cooper River in South Carolina before entering the Atlantic Ocean.
Appeals Information: (This information does not apply to preliminary determinations as indicated by paragraph A.
above).
Attached to this verification is an approved jurisdictional determination. If you are not in agreement with that
approved jurisdictional determination, you can make an administrative appeal under 33 CFR 331. Enclosed you will
find a Notification of Appeal Process (NAP) fact sheet and request for appeal (RFA) form. If you request to appeal
this determination you must submit a completed RFA form to the following address:
District Engineer, Wilmington Regulatory Program
Attn: Amanda Jones, Project Manager
151 Patton Avenue, Room 208
Asheville, North Carolina 28801
In order for an RFA to be accepted by the Corps, the Corps must determine that it is complete, that it meets the
criteria for appeal under 33 CFR part 331.5, and that it has been received by the Division Office within 60 days of
the date of the NAP. Should you decide to submit an RFA form, it must be received at the above address within 60
days from the Issue Date below.
* *It is not necessary to submit an RFA form to the Division Office if you do not object to the determination in this
correspondence. **
Corps Regulatory Official: Amanda Jones
Issue Date: July 12, 2011 Expiration Date: Five years from Issue Date
The Wilmington District is committed to providing the highest level of support to the public. To help us ensure we
continue to do so, please complete the Customer Satisfaction Survey located at our website at
hM:// peg 2.nwp.usace.armv.miVsurvey.html to complete the survey online.
SURVEY PLATS, FIELD SKETCH, WETLAND DELINEATION FORMS, PROJECT PLANS, ETC.,
MUST BE ATTACHED TO THE FILE COPY OF THIS FORM, IF REQUIRED OR AVAILABLE.

Copy Furnished:
Carolina Wetland Services, Attn: Thomas Blackwell, 550 E. Westinghouse Blvd., Charlotte, NC 28273

Permit Number: 2011 -00369
Permit Type: NW03 and 27 / Cherokee - Scotland CIP
Name of County: Mecklenburg
Name of Permittee: Charlotte - Mecklenburg Storm Water Services / Attn: Isaac Hinson
Date of Issuance: June 27, 2011
Project Manager: Amanda Jones
Upon completion of the activity authorized by this permit and any mitigation required by the
permit, sign this certification and return it to the following address:
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Attention: CESAW -RG -A
151 Patton Avenue, Room 208
Asheville, North Carolina 28801 -5006
Please note that your permitted activity is subject to a compliance inspection by an U.S. Army
Corps of Engineers representative. If you fail to comply with this permit you are subject to
permit suspension, modification, or revocation.
I hereby certify that the work authorized by the above referenced permit has been completed in
accordance with the terms and conditions of the said permit, and required mitigation was
completed in accordance with the permit conditions.
Signature of Permittee
Date

A*_,KWJ
NcDE R
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Beverly Eaves Perdue Coleen H. Sullins Dee Freeman
Governor Director Secretary
June 21, 2011
DWQ# 11 -0 162
Mecklenburg County
Mr. Isaac Hinson
City of Charlotte, Stormwater Services
600 East Fourth St.
Charlotte, NC 28202
Subject: Cherokee /Scotland CIP
APPROVAL of 401 Water Quality Certification with Additional Conditions
Dear Mr. Hinson:
You have our approval, in accordance with the general certification and those conditions listed below,
to impact 5911inear feet (If) (141 If, permanent) of unnamed stream in order to complete the project in
Mecklenburg County, as described in your application received by the Division of Water Quality (DWQ) on
February 17, 2011 and subsequent information on June 17, 2011. After reviewing your application, we have
determined that this project is covered by Water Quality General Certification Number 3687 and 3689, which
can be viewed on our web site at httr):Hportal.ncdenr.org /web /wq /swp /ws /401. The General Certification allows
you to use,Nationwide Permit Number 3 and 27 once they are issued to you by the U.S: Army Corps of
Engineers. Please note that you should get any other federal, state or local permits before proceeding with
your project, including those required by (but not limited to) Sediment and Erosion Control, Non - Discharge, and
Water Supply Watershed regulations.
The above noted Certifications will expire when the associated 404 permits expire unless otherwise
specified in the General Certification. This approval is only valid for the purpose and design that you described
in your application. If you change your project, you must notify us in writing, and you may be required to send
us a new application for a new certification. If the property is sold, the new owner must be given a copy of the
Certification and approval letter; and is thereby responsible for complying with all conditions.
In addition to the requirements of the certification, you must also comply with the following conditions:
1. The Mooresville Regional Office shall be notified in writing once construction at the approved impact areas
has commenced.
2. Culverts placed in streamstwetlands shall be installed "in the dry ". Immediately upon completion of the
installation, water flow shall be returned to its natural course. Existing stream dimensions (including the
cross section dimensions, pattern, and longitudinal profile) must be maintained (or restored via constructed
benches) above and below locations of each culvert. If any of the existing pipes are or become perched,
the appropriate stream grade shall be re- established or, if the pipes installed in a perched manner, the
pipes shall be removed and re- installed correctly.
Mooresville Regional Office One
Location- 610 East Center Avenue, Suite 301, Mooresville, NC 28115 NNatunall 'diCarofina
Phone: [phone] \Fax: [phone]\ Customer Service 1- 877 - 623 -6748 Internet http. / /portal.ncdenr.org/web /wq
An Equal Opportunity /Affirmative Action Employer — 50% Recycled /10% Post Consumer Paper

3. Storm water discharge structures at this site shall be constructed in a manner such that the potential
receiving streams (of the discharge) will not be impacted due to sediment accumulations, scouring or erosion
of the stream banks.
4. No waste, spoil, solids, or fill of any kind shall occur in wetlands, waters, or riparian areas beyond the
footprint of the impacts depicted in the Preconstruction Notification application. All construction activities
associated with this project shall meet, and /or exceed, those requirements specified in the most recent
version of the North Carolina Sediment and Erosion Control Manual and shall be conducted so that no
violations of state water quality standards, statutes, or rules occur.
5. Sediment and erosion control measures shall not be placed in wetlands or waters to the maximum extent
practicable. If placement of sediment and erosion control devices in wetlands and waters is unavoidable,
they shall be removed and the natural grade restored within two months of the date the Division of Land
Resources has released the project.
6. Upon completion of the project, the applicant shall complete and return the enclosed "Certificate of
Completion" form to the 401/Wetlands Unit of the NC DWQ.
7. Continuing Compliance. The applicant (City of Charlotte) shall conduct all activities in a manner so as not to
contravene any state water quality standard (including any requirements for compliance with section 303(d)
of the Clean Water Act) and any other appropriate requirements of state and federal law. If DWQ determines
that such standards or laws are not being met (including the failure to sustain a designated or achieved use)
or that state or federal law is being violated, or that further conditions are necessary to assure compliance,
DWQ may reevaluate and modify this certification to include conditions appropriate to assure compliance with
such standards and requirements in accordance with 15 A NCAC 2H.0507(d). Before codifying the
certification, DWQ shall notify the applicant and the US Army Corps of Engineers, provide public notice in
accordance with 15A NCAC 2H.0503, and provide opportunity for public hearing in accordance with 15A
NCAC 2H.0504. Any new or revised conditions shall be provided to the applicant in writing, shall be provided
to the United States Army Corps of Engineers for reference in any permit issued pursuant to Section 404 of
the Clean Water Act, and shall also become conditions of the 404 Permit for the project.
If you do not accept any of the conditions of this certification, you may ask for an adjudicatory hearing.
You must act within 60 days of the date that you receive this letter. To ask for a hearing, send a written
petition that conforms to Chapter 150B of the North Carolina General Statutes to the Office of Administrative
Hearings, 6714 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, N.C. 27699 -6714. This certification and its conditions are final
and binding unless you ask for a hearing.
This letter completes the review of DWQ under Section 401 of the Clean Water Act. If you have any
questions, please telephone Mr. Alan Johnson in the Mooresville Regional Office at 704 - 663 -1699 or Ms. Karen
Higgins in the Central Office in Raleigh 919 -807 -6360.
Sincerely,
for Coleen H. Sullins
Attachments
cc: Army Corps of Engineers, Asheville
Karen Higgins, Wetlands Unit
MRO, Land Quality
Greg Antemann, CWS

irCIDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Office of Conservation, Planning, & Community Affairs pee Freeman, secretary
Beverly Eaves Perdue, Governor Linda Pearsall, ®hector
November 24, 2010
Ms. Sarah Singleton
Carolina Wetland Services
550 E. Westinghouse Blvd.
Charlotte, NC 28273
Subject: Cherokee - Scotland CIP; Charlotte, Mecklenburg County
CWS Project No. 2008 -2256
Dear Ms. Singleton:
The Natural Heritage Program has no record of rare species, significant natural communities, or
significant natural heritage areas within a mile of the project area. However, our database shows a 22.38 -
acre property that is a Catawba Lands Conservancy preserve, in the eastern half of the floodplain of Brier
Creek This locale lies just east of the project area. However, as Brier Creek flows to the south, it
appears that the preserve lies slightly upstream of the project area. Nonetheless, you may want to contact
this organization about its preserve, order
Creek flowing alongside sedimentation
through the presecrven does not
impact the preserve or the wate rs of Brier
You may wish to check the Natural Heritage Program database website at www.ncnhp.org for a listing of
rare plants and animals and significant natural communities in the county and on the quad map. Our
Program also has a new website that allows users to obtain information on element occurrences and
significant natural heritage areas within two miles of a given location:
<http: / /nhpweb.enr. state. nc .us /nhis /public /gmap75_main.phtml >. The user name is "public" and the
password is "heritage ". You may want to click "Help" for more information.
NC OneMap now provides digital Natural Heritage data online for free. This service provides site
specific information on GIS layers with Natural Heritage Program rare species occurrences and
Significant Natural Heritage Areas. The NC OneMap website provides Element Occurrence (EO) ID
numbers (instead of species name), and the data user is then encouraged to contact the Natural Heritage
Program for detailed information. This service allows the user to quickly and efficiently get site specific
NHP data without visiting the NHP workroom or waiting for the Information Request to be answered by
NHP staff. For more information about data formats and access, visit <www nconeman.com >, then click
on "FTP Data Download ", and then "nheo.zip" [to the right of "Natural Heritage Element Occurrences "].
You may also e-mail NC OneMap at <data a ncmail.net> for more information.
Please do not hesitate to contact me at 919 - 715 -8697 if you have questions or need further information.
Sincerely,
Harry E. LeGrand, Jr., Zoologist
Natural Heritage Program ra one Carolina
1601 Mail Service enter, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699.1601
Phone: 919 - 715 -4195 \ FAX: 919 - 715 -3060 Internet: www.oneNCNaturally.org U �aa�`!�
An Equal opportunity \ Affirmative Action Employer — 500/6 Recycled \ 10% Post consumer Paper Nntael Resoi m Plmdq urd C 1

'rub►
North Carolina Department of Cultural Resources
State Historic Preservation Office
Peter B. Sandbeck, Administrator
Beverly Eaves Perdue, Governor
Linda A. Carlisle, Secretaty
Jeffrey J. Crow, Deputy Secretary
February 25, 2011
Thomas Blackwell
Carolina Wetland Services
550 East Westinghouse Boulevard
Charlotte, NC 28273
Office of Archives and History
Division of Historical Resources
David Brook, Director
Re: Cherokee Scotland CIP, Storm Drainage Improvements, Charlotte, CWS 2008 -2256,
Mecklenburg County, ER 10 -2146
Dear Mr. Blackwell:
Thank you for your letter dated February 3, 2011, transmitting the additional information concerning the above
project.
Based on the information contained in your recent letter regarding the scope of the project and the previous
ground disturbing activities in the project area, we are withdrawing our (North Carolina Office of State
Archaeology) request that a comprehensive archaeological survey be conducted at the above noted project
locale. Although previously recorded prehistoric archaeological site 31MK259 is situated within the corridor,
given the amount and scope of previous earth moving activity associated with residential home construction in
and around the project area the likelihood that significant, intact archaeological resources are present is nil.
If an archaeological field investigation is conducted, two copies of the resulting archaeological survey report, as
well as one copy of the appropriate site forms should be forwarded to us for review and comment as soon as
they are available and well in advance of any earth moving activities.
Based upon the additional information supplied, the proposed project will have no adverse effect upon historic
properties. The Charlotte - Mecklenburg Historic Landmarks Commission or Charlotte Historic District
Commission may require additional project review concerning local landmarks and historic districts.
The above comments are made pursuant to Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act and the
above comments are made pursuant to Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act and the Advisory
Council on Historic Preservation's Regulations for Compliance with Section 106 codified at 36 CFR Part 800.
Location 109 East Jones Street, Raleigh NC 27601 Mailing Address 4617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh NC 27699 -4617 Telephone /Fax: (919) 607 - 6570/807 -6599

Thank you for your cooperation and consideration. If you have questions concerning the above comment,
please contact Renee Gledhill- Earley, environmental review coordinator, at 919- 807 -6579. In all future
communication concerning this project, please cite the above - referenced tracking number.
Sincerely,
(�� wd�;A_&DUA
�l udia Brown
....... - 11 _Gas.. .. ... ._ 1 J..

Thomas Blackwell <tjb.cws @gmail.com>
FW: Mitigation credit request for Cherokee - Scotland SDIP
Hinson, Isaac <ihinson @ci.charlotte.nc.us> Fri, May 31, 2013 at 1:51 PM
To: "Bray, Jackie" <jbray @ci.charlotte. nc. us>
Cc: "Fleck, Christopher (cfleck @Dewberry.com)" <cfleck @dewberry.com >, "Thomas Blackwell (tom @cws- inc.net)"
<tom @cws -inc. net>
Not sure if you got feedback from the agencies regarding the property owner's permit application on the Cherokee -
Scotland project. See correspondence below. In a nutshell, it sounds like the easiest way to ensure that the
property owner's impacts are mitigated, and that the mitigation stays in Charlotte, is to have their impacts permitted
on our project and have them pay us for the mitigation costs. The regulatory agencies will only require mitigation for
their impacts and will not require it for the rest of the project. Let me know if we need to discuss.
Isaac
- - - -- Original Message---- -
From: Fuemmeler, Amanda J SAW [mailto:Amanda. Fuemmeler@usace. army. mil]
Sent: Friday, May 31, 2013 10:32 AM
To: Hinson, Isaac
Subject: FW. Mitigation credit request for Cherokee - Scotland SDIP
Amanda Fuemmeler
Asheville Regulatory Field Office
- - - -- Original Message---- -
From: Johnson, Alan [ mailto:alan.johnson @ncdenr.gov]
Sent: Monday, May 20, 2013 12:54 PM
To: Fuemmeler, Amanda J SAW
Subject: RE: Mitigation credit request for Cherokee- Scotland SDIP
I think we can do it as Jarrod suggested. Just for the additional 68 ft. through the city
- - - -- Original Message---- -
From: Fuemmeler, Amanda J SAW [ mailto: Amanda. Fuemmeler @usace. army. mil]
Sent: Monday, May 20, 2013 12:25 PM
To: Hinson, Isaac
Cc: Johnson, Alan
Subject: RE: Mitigation credit request for Cherokee- Scotland SDIP
The 1501f threshold is really a DWQ thing. We have fle)ability on requiring mitigation for part of a project.
Alan - you probably haven't seen this PCN since it's only for 68 linear feet but it's tying on to Charlotte's project
where we asked that they not pipe this section and now the property owner is applying independently. Basically I
posed the question about just requiring mitigation for the impact for the property owner to use the City's bank since
they are going to use EEP but EEP doesn't have anything in that HUC so they would have to go out of HUC and we
typically charge a higher ratio for this. Thoughts? Basically is it possible to revise the permit/401 to the City to
include this impact and just require mitigation for the private owner impact?
Amanda Fuemmeler

Asheville Regulatory Field Office
- - - -- Original Message---- -
From: Hinson, Isaac [mailto: ihinson@ci. charlotte. nc. us]
Sent: Monday, May 20, 2013 10:21 AM
To: Fuemmeler, Amanda J SAW
Subject: FW. Mitigation credit request for Cherokee - Scotland SDIP
Amanda,
Below is my conversation with Jarrod regarding the property owner that wants to add pipe to the end of our
Cherokee - Scotland project. Please take a look to see if you agree with the options that I laid out below. For our
internal process (and MBI), the easiest thing to do would be to permit the additional impact under the CIP.
Unfortunately, this would kick the cumulative impacts over 150 LF, presumably kicking the entire project into
mitigation. Do you have any flexibility to allow for us to be applicant for all of the impacts, require mitigation of the
"private" impacts only, and allow for us to work out the costs with the property owner?
Isaac
From: Karl, Jarrod
Sent: Wednesday, May 15, 2013 12:09 PM
To: Hinson, Isaac
Subject: RE: Mitigation credit request for Cherokee- Scotland SDIP
I would say that we would want the CIP to include it in their permit, the property owner pay the E -team and the
E -team DTI the request to the mitigation bank. There is a restriction on the City selling directly to the public, but as
long as the City is the applicant, we are selling those credits to ourselves.
From: Hinson, Isaac
Sent: Tuesday, May 14, 2013 1:34 PM
To: Karl, Jarrod
Subject: Mitigation credit request for Cherokee - Scotland SDIP
Jarrod,
I just got a call from Amanda and told her I'd run something by you. There is no hurry and she said this may be
something you can discuss at next week's IRT meeting. There is a property owner on the Cherokee - Scotland SDIP
who wants to coordinate with us to install additional pipe at the end of the pipe that we are replacing as part of the
project. Since the new pipe isn't necessary to meet the goals of our project and doesn't have good purpose and
need, Amanda said they would have to permit the impact on their own and mitigate for the 34 LF of additional
impacts. EEP has agreed to provide the mitigation out of HUC. Amanda prefers that the mitigation stay in Charlotte
so wants to see if we can get creative and figure out some way for the property owner to mitigate through our bank.
Some possible scenarios:
1. Property owner pays our mitigation bank. Drawback: this isn't allowed under current MBI.
2. Property owner pays EEP. Drawback: mitigation leaves Charlotte.
3. Amanda adds impact to our upcoming permit application. Drawback: this sets a bad precedent and causes
the entire project to exceed the 150 LF mitigation threshold (we are at about 140 LF now).
4. Maybe we can figure out some way for the property owner to pay the City and have the money DTI'd from the
project to the bank. Drawback: This would require some creativity and there may not be an internal process for
doing this.

0
Let's talk after you've had a chance to digest this (possibly at tomorrow's mitigation meeting, if not sooner).
Isaac Hinson, PWS
Wetland Specialist
Charlotte - Mecklenburg Storm Water Services ihinson @charloftenc.gov <mailto:ihinson @charlottenc.gow
Office: 704 - 336 -4495
Fax: 704 - 353 -0473

Chadoth►dNemenburg
STORM
WATER
~^ Services 5
February 27, 2013
Jackie Bray
City of Charlotte
Storm Water Services
600 East Fourth Street
Charlotte, NC 28202
Subject Project: Cherokee - Scotlant (1425 Scotland Avenue)
HUC #: 03050103 (Lower Catawba)
600 E. Fourth Street
Charlotte, NC 28202
Fax [phone]
The purpose of this letter is to notify you that the City of Charlotte Umbrella Stream and Wetland Mitigation Bank
( "Umbrella Bank ") is willing to accept the mitigation responsibility associated with the subject project. Please note that the
decision by the Umbrella Bank to accept this responsibility does not ensure acceptance by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
or the North Carolina Division of Water Quality. It is the responsibility of the applicant to coordinate with these agencies to
determine if payment to the Umbrella Bank for impacts associated with this project is appropriate.
This acceptance is valid for six months from the date of this letter. The following documents must be submitted to the
Umbrella Bank within this time frame for this acceptance to remain valid:
1. 404 Permit Verification
2. 401 Water Quality Certification
3. Executed Departmental Transfer Invoice (DTI) between Flood Control cost center and the Mitigation Bank
cost center detailing the use of and payment for the credits described in the table below.
Based on the information supplied by your office, the stream and wetland credits that are necessary to satisfy the
compensatory mitigation requirements and the total mitigation credits available for this for this project are detailed in the
table below.
The stream and wetland mitigation will be provided as specified in the Section 404 Permit or corresponding 401 Water
Quality Certification for impacts associated with the subject project in Hydrologic Unit 03050103 of the Lower Catawba
River Basin. The mitigation will be performed in accordance with the Agreement to Establish the City of Charlotte
Umbrella Stream and Wetland Mitigation Bank in Mecklenburg County, North Carolina, dated June, 16, 2004.
If you have any questions or need additional information, please contact me at (704) 432 -0966 or jkarlOcharlottenc.gov.
Sincerely
Jarrod J. Karl
Mitigation Administrator
cc: Amanda Jones, USACE
Alan Johnson, NCDWQ
Isaac Hinson, CMSWS
File
•
To report pollution or drainage problems, call: 311
http: / /stormwater.charmeck.org
CAMI fl W
Stream
linear feet
Wetlands
acres
Credits Requested for This Project
34
N/A
Credits Available for This Project
34
N/A
Mitigation Project Names
Dairy and Sed efield Park Branch
The stream and wetland mitigation will be provided as specified in the Section 404 Permit or corresponding 401 Water
Quality Certification for impacts associated with the subject project in Hydrologic Unit 03050103 of the Lower Catawba
River Basin. The mitigation will be performed in accordance with the Agreement to Establish the City of Charlotte
Umbrella Stream and Wetland Mitigation Bank in Mecklenburg County, North Carolina, dated June, 16, 2004.
If you have any questions or need additional information, please contact me at (704) 432 -0966 or jkarlOcharlottenc.gov.
Sincerely
Jarrod J. Karl
Mitigation Administrator
cc: Amanda Jones, USACE
Alan Johnson, NCDWQ
Isaac Hinson, CMSWS
File
•
To report pollution or drainage problems, call: 311
http: / /stormwater.charmeck.org
CAMI fl W

X
I11 -
(
o !�o r {Il� 1111111/ \ / i ae �'� \ ! . y\, ,i`- _ ce, rrr
�\
oil
� \\ •N I �qli 111 �$ % � _-fi B -�� R! �\ _ 1'.r i` -'$ ��`r'r �' ss'
7 r + e r 11111 11 "c
tl(! �d�, 'A �� u qi't • O
a 1 11 I 4y/ g f i�r, So
It @=
a, V
` -\ �% `• ! lr:•!I� � � R \ �iiAi i7�'� dam°_— \ �'• /,
j1 -' ' ' i ill i I , f .°..• l \ !' \� y � \ � \�\ \�\e \ � C\ � � `� ,��`'�10� /r
p6 • // � / 111 r r! 1 \f \� \ \\ �� ) �/f //'
e 4 v c
Its
!riv
A,�
1 /
IIn
/f/ \ � � �'`
� r�� r� � r � 4 N,`�\ r�•r
\ 1 1 1
j
1 a � III , ! � y +r!` et
Ott'
$
o
1 I' o
R
I
t
at I
? ' 30
I ! /
®
MATCH LINE SHEET 5.1 STA. 6 +50
oy6\��� gNOg
L 1•
P�
CI( d
SHEET CHEROKEE/SCOTLAND °001°0' ' b°i 70 "' no mrE RV o[swvnon
5.0 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT JOB NO YAK Dewberry
PROJECT CAD mF PATH a m m unDa N.0 REGISTRATION ! F - 0876
OF OPEN CHANNEL IMPROVEMENTS m a� nl��l0 0 do a WImm 8Duneao�u�wnow
SOH EROSION SEDIMENT PREPUODRV aacuDRV Sere,.. " m�ra sp�� moon
III CONTROL PLAN or oDnROn FAX oo Q s �Wl)a m
STA. 0+00 TO 6+30 APPROVED BY DATE

®� Uva AR03AOVMV 00+91 O,L OS+9 'V,LS
Cr�.ul ai o eeeoo noa a�oNe tms— e� m® hr a 70N.LN0a
l` ,a,,,u, __ iii
sa+uu '�' `` xsMOM xaa3NYd3Na MINJIMS II HOM Moo
a°ae r as �ouon mo o e �� . _ /�\ �. jp
`01,11 O B w�IMeO •we•a RAM • $f1J13Atl Q11itl IZOJS
8180 _ d C NOLLV LL6103U 'O N mom or wom s iC w.va av:)
= m 6 ova oxeor 1I\I3W3A02IdWI'1V1IdVJ
NaU•DESM All Uva ON -ter •� QNV'LLOJS / 33MOI13HJ J33HI
?' NO.,,
��yy ga a
10
phas ro `Ha \e
If Ig
00 +91 'd1S Z'9 133HS 3NI1 HOldW
ell
111 u' � .¢ , / •� � -$ 17,,,
�♦ _ 1 1 4
! L I
� —_ \° --
"a oil \\ it
\ I "�\ f oil
\
Q I \__ �f I li
t '"' II t
Q 11`• ''/ s ° 1 1 r' q�1@ \\ \ r f I 111 I i
I'I 4
ro
r' /, / \ I I i III #I $A #1
®p \ �l II I I 111 I
�(pg�Ci /A`I
W 1 /` i '.� Y �i ! I '�I I� .11�aeaor I`
G �. _ � r \ � � J,r.� — — � I / —' I l •;, a.oa IOrnO� y 1 I
InA i � >�,,,,.,,.�,. � .........,..� / / I • � • E.
�' \\ / I iii I� � LI - -' —_ .
W 1 1 \ \ p E
jig
�\\ 411�'�� 11 I I 1 I L
I I r-- -_-•' ! I, �:rX II L \ / j r I : �> I ! __/ I , 11 { ° \\ II I It.4 �
I I Op II I
\ \ I J 1
F� I 9.Q o: oermr I 1 \ I 1 I I I
I 1 �-• -- ��� II _ _ � 1 I —� I lo� 1
jISP Ilk = #�gA
lr X' mss. '``•?tii, `','; !� ' .;. y , \y O I / I I I I 9
' Iy; ,'c •''. t. ;•r:.''i r •. �: {';.•e c�'�Or _ / �" 1.
i' :'ti• �% =•; .y =': •z •::;. _'9.. I+,• _'�-- -? - -•� y '/ ail .' 1` `�
I'•I. ,Q •:r';.}zti.,j- .•Y•:�r`y,•y ?•�;• � ¢ 1°''\ 1 /__I —_ '� `\ // I p � ' � 'j�� 1
to 1 \ .:. "_ -1.:. %Y; •tea \\ \ 1 1 ` 11 I --
1 n N, 44x1 I>♦ � I � I \ ,
01 k
OJ
'
01 W ' r 49 1 i I! I� �K a��ll I I In
-g1�
**A gg
i \
IgAo
' \\
I 5 ' \
roA / t
MP SAP I i; 8 1111
R g> M i \ 811i 0
��o I / \ / I UII •.
\�jI III .. ki
JulZ. �.
.lot a P��r7�x0
r Q

J _'J
• \ r
r
\ r \
\
low '/'
\ I rk,
OY$\by1'� NO9
L
A�
CK
I
"mod
!f
�t
t
r
e §gyp c8 i
111 1111121
R1 9 � Q
° soil g
oil
4 Asia Jill
SS
.'<p
JE
gill
0 1
Ila
C
r Q
! � y
n
Q
y�
On
O
Vt
ny
O�
yn
>�
dz°
SHEET
6.1
CHEROKEE/SCOTLAND
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT
PROJECT
mm4m
'IM'"'
���
mil' Eervrrea
ew
ogre
BY
DESaurnon
a
Dewberry
N.C. REGISMTION A F - 0879
Dewberry & Davie Inc.
aam m w "DAD
owW ( w asma®
A�o.e oPU aoaawe
PAIL DDamPaPm
•
�• p�ry �p
CHARMlll ire
m�
CAD FtLE PATe
7
+u�
m
a
ao
W ma
OF
111
TEMPORARY
CONSTRUCTION ACCESS
EASEMENT FROM
SCOTLAND AVENUE
m
PREPARED BY
oar
CHEMBY
•
ao
W �roa
4
AD
��
or
APPROVED BY
cl �a aw
DATE

OPEN CHANNEL IMPROVEMENTS STA. 1 +50 TO ' 6 +50
\ _ -- - - -- •
N.
^ o aMOr'm � AV
_ y11 pppp p •.i� _ _ 4 LIP dF PIPE 10 /
N. ` - �REMOYE S lF \ \� °O- ^` `�` 't'��� �� ^�`\'� -\ 'pR� - '- \ "��t�.ti- -- - - ~} I QAVLIWIT -/-- P\I N-`� �p �p 6p now
/ L 6G /^
C / ` OF Saba -- � - _ .� _ _ _ REMOVE 60 LF OF EX, / 1 1 I / 3 LF OF CONC. FLUME " = r •
LANDSCAPE O ,� `� SPLIT PAL FENCE 1 I II II / AND REFORM FLUME WITH 20' SCALE: HORZ. 1 20
_ _ _ _ REMOVE 25 LF OF EX. I I I I I �� - - _Z JRA01US AND AN END ELEVAnoN OF at
"0 �O SPLIT RAL FENCE / IIIIIIIII 1 _627.11. (SEE DETAIL SHEET 7.11) VERT. 1 4 LL R
° Omno °xcn '1q --_ ° - \ Illllllllj
@ Aq q ! ` �~ -•. IBC,
STARE CHANNEL BANK E F001 ` \�` `\ ` OL OVERHEAD 11111111 III �.�c�' • z0 6
STABILIZATION STA. 3+07_ E SPECIAL PROVISIONS `\ P ° e POWER LINES _ ` 1 1111 1 1111 °- rvO° wr iwo 1 a•. a �O "r + on I= s
s� wee co EHTILITY NOTR
M M
O
•�` �.� • �' t / ti ra �aa• ' p�p"� UY LOCAMW 9q ID M AM APPNOOOIAIE M IT p
CONTRACTISYS
at _ at A t ~ R 1 WI�
R W� OIK L UWAWE W LE45 m 0WI OBIM UTILITIES .6
$ - - • • -- Ih aLOULD Lc m1RR RLIOCAim rsR nANS a PRDHEH;BD Z
UTDm SWM Or ne Iglu[ a�¢T TIME
- - - - - __ - - - - - - - - - - - to AWT AL WSTWXRao ANDAR GARrXAT+w
`�_ - _ : -J - _ - - - - -e T — - W SANITARY SEWER A WATER LIAR LATERAL. NOTE
AND S IIIN ON Y E[RLA E IT 94 HAVE INE INIEN LOGIFD
010 LpM dl TQ PLM1IL rt 0 LO A AL
aMmACI (a�rLaTR�L>sow�gw�TrO TmNOLacAT*. ALL s�wa
l o O o _ _ - - _ - - _ - %��'ry , :�% B 1�N sACRMiB�ALL SCMCE IA�TFRAIB NP�
T�try - -
BY TIB OWMACIOi SHALL BE REPAOEDAAERMW AS
W PART or T® CONTRACT.
T_7DS — i - - j`,ML��A'- - ' ° � TRAFFIC CONTROL NOTE
- - - - ` /Q \ l - - - - - °_ \ ' \ PROTEGE GAZEBO - `�.y \ `' - r - mm TRAFFIC 00080. SHALL W AS 90M ON 4RE7S
y l Y/Y LNLLY
!a .awin �a WRING CONSTRUCTION �� ®s PAVDIG NOTE Y
O42EB0 TO REMAIN �TMffiC1111161111 AS ILAT oY m "M OOILTDII CUM p
room DOSTING �-� •'r •• - - - -\ \ // • // -\- a r `\ \ ` / � SoWA AG1[ 0 ROIK
E CABLE TROLLEY T PR6 M a'
EXISTING FoOI Q 6 6 9
/ SEE SPECIAL PROVISIONS L ^ 7 / I -'l PROPOSED 41200 i' ON PLANS AN A,,M,, . ,W MD RE-PA. PER
�1°�'", �'0°• -- -' 5�„J % / 2ft SI+OPES 1 aaww" Y�;,i OUTCROP TO t PROP. PERM. _ W/ RIPRAP & BWK--- B% Nu oasma BTRQT LxOa 11DM v AREA SaM k
- -NOTE E70STIIIC POWER LDIES ro BE RELOCATED OETAL SQET 70
_ - BE REMOVED ETHER TEMP. OR PERMANENTLY. SHALL BE r MATTOM. SDIBEIZATIO L SEE - PROFILE NOTE <
LIVE STAKWO IN 2:1 BANK - PERFORMED BY 07MM SHEET S 0 _ DETAIL SHEET 7.6 Tpp °
w'P'�'�� (/ r in. • e'mr1 °��i.. a�i..�aseu / r ` - SLOPE AREAS STA 3+40 ro - _..♦`�+� - © ♦ _ i / Fly v Z= mAN WMMW IT$ ARE SIM M PWU Fa
1 5+81 PLACE LIVE STAKES •mrr a r,..e. _ - - 'miM1 _ _ - At 7.7 � Y. To � NOTATE fuL Lm18 OF g -
/- - _ I PER DETAIL THIS SHEET • awon + 7 ~ �� PROPOCE AomrIDID URII�
I ©' - - _ (28'X50 1 SS TONS
/ \ `\ .-•.T' / `7 movev° am ` / samr°iLia� M mss.' • - - SY I�YEDI N
Fo
NCDOT TYPE�11 °� ' ^ • /
I \ r /-` vaorrmar•w�na / - - - 1L
L 1 \ �/ ar .an ro � \ � ae nrtw a � " 1 r _ - _ OFAIDREE FABRIC CLDS j
1 H Aor•m•rnwa+ee`au i' .23 I /
`� r r7 �,♦ aT.�
b
�i
645 645 �✓
Hill
/
20D n
640 0 640
plc
1NIW1® �
J
635 " 635 y
• lF OLSIMO P: o
000.M N a vj °
e7O°iaDiNN�o O i M � B o
630 6 30 € 9p
630 o
rNM HDTHiNR alnn •m Q 4
PROP. 155 TONS (28' X SC) r' irrrr N m e-
62S CLASS 1 R94W 1.5' THICK
0
T YGEiExntE 625 MCDOTPE B O $
TYPICAL CHANNEL WITH LIVE STAKES AND
FABRIC CLDS j 20.23
2:1 SIDE SLOPES ~
W
W
620 EX GROUND — — "r ' rr 620 A z
W
— — — — — —
z
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — Ld w a
o
615 — — 615 � �
NGa+o OOrHOW.d
610 610 roQcesev �� Oa. r%
°
sFx U U
J•860 Y
X51 +50 2+00 2+50 3+ 3130 4+00 rOPHER M' •r
4150 5+00 5+50 6+00 6+50
00 Ds

SCOTLAND AVENUE STA. 6 +50 TO 11 +00 REMOVE
... ... REMOVE AND REPLACE 24 ASPHALT Mt REPLACE '
EX. 16' RCP STORM AS'LNLT FULL DEPTH A OF 168 SY ON
SY OF CONCRETE SIDEWALK SEE DETAIL
CLOS /10.22 AT JO-301A � BROAD 7S0 IO 60
- - - - - -- L — `_ ♦ ® °r -. ° °.
COORDINATE — - - - - - -- -____- SCALE
POTTER POLE DURING
°Lr ° °° r. \� ®� \; 1 SCE HORZ. 1 " =20'
q-r - -- -- \� �o o ;�: = =3- _ � S VERT. 1" =4'
CONCRETE DRIVEWAY ,- - - - - i °-REMOVE 2T LF OF EX 18' RCP "m RELIEVE EX. COQ \ �' - ` �� EXISTING 64• CMP CONNECTED
CLDS / 10.25A - %•� 'i, + °•`:' _ - I - AID REPLACE CORN IB' RCP- WITH P .CB I ` % TO EXISTING 78' CMP
•` � SHEET 6.29 FOR 20' WmE AIX;ESS , _ . _ c"""_� L� SEE 4LEET 8.34 _ - - \ 3 LF TO TIE - I O 57 TH6 PROFILE ; FOR THIS PROFILE - \ \ , I SAWL\R AND REMOVE 3< LF OF 84• rrT >.. • 18' RCP I/ COIIREPLA DRIVE • �!! ' 1 m mini o PROP. SB LF OF FLWDRAL • - 1 .jp ��- \i dl' AND REPLACE WRH 27 LF OF - - - - - 20 FEET EtAq( FROM CURB \ 84' CMP Nm CB -303. SEE DETAIL SAw CUr E (STING CO IC. WN2. (4 L!7 •,..:: • // P - - • CLDS / 10.38 A & 8 - ' TO ACCOMMODATE PIPE IISTALU710N. SHEET 7.11 FLX2 PIPE Cg1/Jt REMOVE Nm REPLACE HAI WId AS •. ,: / S l REMOVE EX. WW REPLACE WIRL T NEEDED. SEE PROJECT SPECIAL . �. y / 1 Ex. 18• RCP HIN -301) SEE DETAIL SHEET 7.8 °' i I CONSIRIJCr TRANSITION 'REPLACE ��p�y ti ! t I STORM DRAINAGE ° I f - '. ' _ I i STRUCTURE CO-303 (SEE _ s
REMOVE
It EOSRNm WOODEN 8 a r : , `\ TO REAM _ _ _ _ " - ala•• • r• STRUCTURAL DETAIL SLEET 7.1)
SECURE/ DECK. REPLACE IN KIND PROTECT EX. I _ �- _ �..• \ I • PREVENT ACCESS DURING
-- : �ro ae i t.• •ti SE SHEET 826 WALL DURING CONSTRUCTION. . COORDINATE I -- - ' q0 �°0A➢ {�L" I .
_ -_%C• 2 S', /�y° a �'d
cm&mwcnoN WITH HOMEOWNERS. I srH awn A:' I r !'` a •, THIS ALIGNMENT d Ot7N51RI1CTpN- - ti_ P
y �: -e , i ,i ��rG p ,, a' - x ! • ROCK CHIMNEY UTILITY NOTE
PROTECT FOUNDATION '•'I �ti j••..y: .. 1 x
L _I _ - ,I DURING CONSTRUCTION. �, s ;'i ti:; 1 ® ` � _ _ ON TREE CLDB / 40.14 na uwn tarwnaa MOM ARE AvoaaemutE Mtn IT
REMOVE Mt REPLACE I PROVIDE STOOP DRANNp 1 - °. •..'ryL1 , / ..:: amn _ ,/ s... u _- _ - - ' l :s naEO - - a q,-•,, e / k REPLACE 20 SY w O AT
78 LF OF WROUGHT _I AND PR07ECIlON RAIN '' �� s ` - - 6y i -' - r i BVE
IRON FENCE I : f'"y: .' - _ "+" �r
- - EXITiTI♦'NI' - I I :y' I: : • i :' +: q,r e LL / I T L m - / : 4 1\ I \ \\ / ' OF 0 to SIDEINAIJ( S1OLU EITM RElOLAND PER RNIS PEO1Filln
FOOTBRIDGE I • ` , • •' •y ::r / / I rq:',a�0..- , \ w ' / I 1 \ PROPOSED WATER LINE SECTION OOF THE IgRS SEE FOR
�� 1 or '•: .tt•• - , , i , >P ,' \\ \�Ia \ / , REPLACEMENT SEE ULl AId110M OKIRJCINME AID/W OLARIGITINL
PROTECT FOUtAAT10N -, =Z _ .;t; •.,:. !. y PROPERLY UNE CONSTRI _ ., �,�• _ t , REMOVE 84 LF OF EX. 76' CMP SANITARY SEWER a WATER LONE LATERAL. NOTE
` PPRROV�I E uot+o® • I-+'"` •i: :Y ^ - - L i � i \ O \ \ / \ UOIFn SANITARY ffITTA u1FRIMS NME BEEN
LOCATED °
` Romm ... ••,; .. - - . EXISTING RIPRAP \ BEHOVE Mt REPLACE 22 LF \ \\ <L , I \ AI DE t2' x 8' RLI3C � �, ON TEe PLANE, rc LATERALS H W Dc E
AND PROTECTION PLAN 7 1:., .a X. ;: - -_ . TO BE REPLACED OF 4- SPLIT RAIL FENCE • �: \ \ ONLTLp App Rt TNA
k I ♦ ow. rlo , ;'•i °•• •OE As NEEDED IF DISTURBED FROM \ \ \ _ /''G� \� \ i , / \ FROPOBED SANITARY SEWER u ACnYTRB• SfANC1: T MAWr R RPACIO SERVICE
STA. 7+80 TO sm 8470 Y CONCRETE SIDENALX CLDS j 10.22 \ `\ A' \ i . /Y MUMM Au uTDULS SPACRD
,>J \ r . -A-- i REMOVE M! REPLACE 27 SY OF \ a \ RFRACFl1ENT SEE Ui.3
Q Z� _ J ♦ s�� �' '1b - PROP. PERM. (Named PROTECT EX. \ RF]IOVE k REPLACE 20 SY OF \ \ \\ \ \' \ ~ / / ' / , \ t � OF OMrWZM THIS muu Lc rTTrNITTD/nwACm As p
INSET T►I85 SHEET 5.1 REMOVE WONT
CONSTRUCTION I Co►xYSETE DRIVEWAY CLOS ® 10 26A \\ \ / \ \\ \ \Y\\, / \\' / G 30 CURB s CURER OLDS i 10.17A 0 IE % • { \dt REPLACE 74 LF STANDARD 7'RAPPIC CONTROL NOTE:
\ PROP. POOL AND CHANNEL 5 REMOVE & REPLACE 74 LF STANDARD / \ \ \ \\ 4b \, 6_ W '' . ® Alm REPAVE 168 SY 4 SNNt BE AS glow 01 Stirs
,v I I Immm�o GRADING DETAILS ilii B \ \fit i� ` �m"•r �'m�� OF ASPHALT ON COLNUE ROAD
LO � O 4S TON CLASS I RIPRAP OVER 45 SY mNUSa aA 30' CURB d< CUTTER CLDS / t0.17A (' \ \ \`• 'e+r+.. yby- w .r o r APjA'a kT�7�010 BTEEET d11R: WD1N m LBf10\E m 9 s
w . • aaw. a aiw,m Y SEE SLEET 8.34 \ / \ n ar ro (SEE PANIC NOTE THIS SLEET
N HCOOr TYPE I GEOTEIIIE m: ro ea \ \ FOR THIS PROFILE \' \\ Tara .00r m ry r•.w AND DETAIL SLEET 7.9) ASPHALT OVDEAV ID 1RP'OI a OEEINIO drc1ER
r FABRIC IN PROP POOL AREA rrc ar • • • ® .w.. \ \\ .... aoouo.r PNI� vARCS , - -y-� ML AM IBILOY[
U3 i �\ aov • rAr �m Y \ \ - / \ ASPIIALT FR01 OITIFR PAN 90VAC E
x d , Ex. HW REPLACE /' •n arrlt Av R10MOVE 26 LF OF Ex 24' RCP
WITH HIN-202 SEE DETAIL i \ \ \ EX. 24' RCP STORM .
S (� REMOVE 42 LF i \•' \ AND REPLACE WITH 24' RCP - - \ 1 . \ \ a� \\ JO-301 B 0) ELT SM SRRXT Dr W WDTN OF AREA SNOW g -
Lf1
EXISTING GABIOIIS SHEET 7.8 W 7.7 '\ OISRNC SANIURY SEWER k WATER SRVICES T\ \R - DRAINAGE TO TIE IN AT OR PLANS AN ADDITIONAL, IA• AND RE -PATE PER
GRADE SWAIE NE AND 25 IF FOUNDATION DURING CONSTRUCTION. EXISTING - RELOCATED OR RECONNECTED AS '`� / \
J µ,ONO_ RCBC EOSIING HEADWALL, '•'\_PROVIDE SHOP OW1WN05 AND PROTECTION PLAN NEEDED BY CONTRACTOR (IMP.) \ - - - - - _ �\ \ \\ 4•� ♦\, \ / PROm.s NOTE
L�fI ' ' 1 CONTRACTOR TO RECONNECT ALL LOCAL - VL �.•\ / \ PROPOSnJbasim UmNWS Yom 3" or PROPOSD
DRAMS AND SUBMIT SHOP DRAWINGS FOR aTTXR11 ORwI rrwVDNENTS NW aDW O FRaeX FOR
AND ACTIVITY PRIOR TO T DETAIL CORE OLARITI OILY NOG11E HILL W7S OP
AND REBAR SWJ. EE F£R DED11L SLEET 7.0.
6
6
640
635
630
6
6
6
8+00 8+50 9+00 9+50 10+00 10+50 11+00
s g
r••t ,• / ,§E,'N+ ~`�� aNSHNG AND PROP. J
RIPRAP EXTENTS `
4.1 SLOPE
AREA
'
p
640 tA•' � MOTCII 8' LDIXL AROLAID
% FA men CORNER OF HEADWALL IF
POOL GRADING INSET �\
1, SCALE 1' - 20' \ s
635 a
630
Az
Z
M z
s
0 PtN CAROM
r apps x z
SELL U V O
C, 34550 Y
5
TOA•HER M er
M
I wi w t 1raC A L. W's
`C
..
pfsjwi(ti!!!�#-1401-
lb"oil
w.
_
�vm
I�u.:
!.. ::jai a.. n, a•.:
�
_.
��1��
�-
■I�iiLtii111r��ifsvi
�_��
■�11��
����■��
■��
OWN - s�■n►■u
�i! Iw�s! Iwi�Qlwi�Qlwi�i! iwi�����-■-
E�7LrT�
':a.�LYW:1:�1NN�l�_�!:,.'
-_ "_' .- . ",...'-
■-
1_��
-
■���■
_
Fwm
-41111-
wqppl
__.L.L
8+00 8+50 9+00 9+50 10+00 10+50 11+00
s g
r••t ,• / ,§E,'N+ ~`�� aNSHNG AND PROP. J
RIPRAP EXTENTS `
4.1 SLOPE
AREA
'
p
640 tA•' � MOTCII 8' LDIXL AROLAID
% FA men CORNER OF HEADWALL IF
POOL GRADING INSET �\
1, SCALE 1' - 20' \ s
635 a
630
Az
Z
M z
s
0 PtN CAROM
r apps x z
SELL U V O
C, 34550 Y
5
TOA•HER M er

SCOTLAND AVENUE STAR 11 +00 TO 16 +00
• I
J ,
I r_ I _ __
anaa w a� .w
..mca s mm, I I r �- I ..o w,awavr 1
T---
J
cor ,°�paoa�r�n�.w s-.w I Nwr nerr I mr ,: r{z� 1-- ^•�� _ .ormi� •niur�'i -.w I
rt.,n .K I o I ,min. I I F- -,.aw r �{�•aa_ - _ t ....^•. 1T 7!"7 I sooruw .,r / T
I : \ Y01 k REPAVE 4.26a SY OF
-aa. svwxn .r I REMOVE AND REPLACE \ ASPWILT ON SCOTLAND AVE - J / 0 60
- - - - J I 25 LF OF 24' VALLEY I (INCLUDING 1632 SY ADM 400 {
- - - REMOVE Ex. CO CURB CLDS / 10.179 REMOVE & REPLACE ASPHALT FULL\ AND 600 ALIGMENTS) /
DEPTH A TOTAL OF 1,864 SY ON \ (SEE PAVING NOTE THIS SHEET I
NT _ -6� �� L- -- I 9COT1AND AVENUE ( INCLUDOG 844 \v AND DETAIL SHEET 7.9) rr _ r R
EXISIDIC 8• PVC DRAINAGE - SY ALONG 400 AND 600 ALIGNMENTS) ( REMOVE & REPLACE 13 SY / SCALE: HORZ. l 20
-PROPOSED 4S BEND SYSTEM TO REMAIN IN \ CURB 7RANSITION v SEE DETALL SHEEP 7.9 BE RELOCATED OR �OMhTicmum 0� f10.2 DRIVEWAY IN r xED RC BEIm rr _ r LL
IN r VERT. 1 4
PRECAST xor- PLACE CLDS / 10.30 • RECONNECTED AS NEEDED ROADWAY SURFACE l / M Y Q
\ I ' HEIGHT TO BEVEL ZERO AT SEE SHEET 6.29 FOR i' CONTRACTOR .) _ SEE CURB TRANSITION PROPOSED WATER LINE d
w.c oeauv
DRIVEWAY LOCATION 7116 PROFILE / \\ PROPOSED 1S BEND - DETAIL CLOS / 10.30 REPLACEMENT SEE F R
RREPANR & 1I — IN 71%8' RCBC HEIGHT 70 BEVEL ZERO AT c S
— Y .s — I SPEED BUIICONDRION I 1 DRIVEWAY LOCATION
i
/� °° f I
W 'w / w r a r {S'EE DETAIL SHEET 7.11) w \ c r .y�, „p a . w LO 0
GOS. .• =w W I - - -- w - = == 1r -- / - R - ----- 1------ - - - - -- - N�rw ssc 0 Int4w NOTE, Q
- - -i' 1-. .- - -- - - -- ------------ Y= P"41m74 MT' 'W'- -- - -- LLI Co TE UIW1Y IAGTiQ6 91811 ARE APPROOR111TE AND R
15 W CONTRACTOW'S RESPONSIBILITY TO LLI HORIZONTAL AM vrxWx N OF DU
II S OTLAND UBLIC R�W I a `
.4 •e z = LE TO 0E DAYS PM OO DIDOT NC BMW AT
ss ss ss ss rt ac6D ss C ! —. ss ss s Iss ss -- -� ss ss - - ss "Sri'° N N-P AaERU� cMON, P� SEE W UMnIES
ON PRUIEC=
WN UTILITY SECTION OF TICE CORRAL NOES 94M FOR
.. F •r�.21Si3 .. `•Ciro d - in ADDrRGm otsu avow AND/Olt CIAINITCANK
I C G G C G G G --r„^, G G G SANITARY SEWER A WATTE ERNE LATERAL NOTT:
0 _ ? _� G G UNITED SANITARY SEIM LATEPAIS HAVE BEEN 1O01TED
REMOVE & REPLACE 472 LF _
SF.
OF 24' VALLEY CURB cLOS / CURB TRNISR N �- ,/ Oen Q1'c1 q� REMOVE REPLACE 17 SY PROPOSED SANRNEY / aey� ' r D(. CB �MD1111RACCTOR'S�REWOMW¢M�mp�AYE ARIL SERVICE
10.178 REMOVE & REPLACE 1S �, \ v I d., 1 OF CONCRETE DRIVEWAY / 8 - SEWER RFPIACDAEM //, M• RY � AcAVIN DB ALL�SFAMa IAWTLAYNS ONa�
VET s ` SY OF STONE PAVERS \ CIOS / 10.30 fEE1WVE & REPLACE 13\ $ 1 3pI 1 CUB / 10.27A / a p,
CURB CUTS S 10.27A emr a \\ BEVEL CURB HEICHT TO SY OF STONE PAVERS \ Y i Fi I 6 �!� �M�, e �� SEE SHEET 11L3 BY T O CTHIS CONIR CT. SE REPADWD/IBRA® A9 p
s�.,>< q EXISTING GAS LINE TO BE REIJX:l1 !)'' /
HEIGHT TO ZERO AT 1O1 i ° \ ZERO AT DRIVEWAY LOCATION CLDS f 10.27A \ > 1 PMT OF 1NIS CONIRAC ►.
• "" em _ . ,� < v o < ^' BY OTHERS AS NEEDED m uN -a.. CURB TRANSITION jY $ TRAPPEC CONTROL NOTE:
1 DRIVEWAY LOCATION - - - -� - -- -- ��-__�� - ----\ $ ?dm \ narOw am, / ,
_ _ --2233 _ •�
x S -- - - - - -- a. a• \ — - %...•o,. - -- - f---= °_====- Le^'2_�? / �' COS / 10.30 0•"' . CONIRaL9WLeEASSIrowaN9aETS S0�
�Q •Vr' - j°o - -- -- EtD�----- - -1 - -- -- - - �- -- - '� °O 1'° _ PROPOSED 4S BEND IN / i vAVMC NOTE:
1 - REPAIR OPEN JOINT INN ♦ - _ , REMOVE &
1r - -- RESEAL AROUND CNP PIPE AT STA 7 +72 I -.� \ \ \ DRAINAGE EASEMENT -1 _ r x 6• PRECAST RCLC REPLACE 77 LF 0 N MIL E1MONI STREET ENDS: =IN m RDICIE
I AT STA 2 +23 . f 1 M6 16 Pa s.6 1 °TOIL _ — REMOVE 24 LF 2,C VALLEY CURB
/ $ - PA9rNALT OVFIOAARR.+Y �oEVTN 1SEmL 0REMG E R
REPAIR OPEN JOINT 1 SDE SD.E - SDk SDE soE �pETpEDa1ON DOTTER P SMACE
REMOVE & REPLACE POPE AT STA 2 +60.— sDE sDE 5DE \sue -" soE 1 I _=/i REMOVE & REPLACE 1a SY SEX. -13• RCP CLDS / 10.178 A5171AL
CUT (4) CPP FLUSH TO CUT (2) CPP FLUSH TO MILL DOW STREET EN1RE WIDTH OF AREA MOM
2+80. AND 3+02 wrNN CUT (3) CPP FLUSH 84' CLIP AND RESEAL CPP -- 84' CAP AND RESEAL 1 m 'OF CONCRETE DRIVEWAY \ \� ♦yINppAIL S FEET G,�M'A�DaDW1AL ,s' AND RE-PAVE r4n
BRKlC SIDEWALK y" 1�� �'"`�"`�w °�" 1-- 1 - - -� CLDS 10.27A �.Y � +, � \ _�� PROP. 43 LF OF $
TO 84' CNP AND AND CUP AT STA 1 +42 CPP AT STA. 1+08 I f`�
CLDS / 10.27A REMOVE I REPLACE 11S a`p1p:N°9` RESEAL AT STA. 2 +21 I i wiz aw."`"iniw CR CPP FLUSH TO Be w ,ziiw )I \ �.;f � BACK FROM CURB yROm.E NOTE:
SY OF CONCRETE & BfZICK � `, - r A I I L - . CEIP AND RESEAL CPP �o• �,iw r-'i \\ 'r, REMOVE EX. CO �S CLDS / 10.36 A & 6 FROPOSFD/Easim u1W1¢S NRLRN ST OF PROPOSED
_DRIVEWAY CLDS P 10.27A a- cor n aoa m rvis.rr CLARITY ONLY TNB DOES NOT DON•wTC RILL umns OF �R
,xn ..c AT STA 0+93 I \ �"'•,i REMOVE 20 LF REMOVE 13' RCP. ataRN ORAO1 DWROUEIRXM ARE SHORN IN PROFILE FOR 6NIN1 \UHgi/
OF EX 13• RCP. PROPOSEDADISING U1611E5
660
655
650
0
0
645 w-
f�
64010
LLJ
W
2
6351EJ
7
630
625
620
u
660 �N
I�
1
/
655
i
650
8�
+
645 €
~ s
N
ul �$ m
LO 64o I g si S
W
W
S
N
w 635 F
N w
o�H�—
630 CA 04
ra
625 N u 0,,
00 aASDD xe
s� � QD,NEEQ' �trrar
620 rOPnERR.a� c ~
E 14+50 15+50 1 6+00
■�:i
BLACK PLASTIC GAS LINE TO BE
ELOCATED BY OTHERS
—VACUUM EXCAVATION PERFORMED
BY ON-TARGEr ON 6/26/09
lo;
pw
��Elwlm
...
V
=11�
-
■�M1111■'.
T
N
- -
WE
to
�■m
■��1�1
—
■ —'
ih9 _ 1 ' ,' 1.12
1 ►1-
-
-
_
_
w��
a �i�M
.�C�il�■
SHEET UT3
FOR DETAILS AND —m
N REQUIREMENTS
—�_
7
_
■
■
660 �N
I�
1
/
655
i
650
8�
+
645 €
~ s
N
ul �$ m
LO 64o I g si S
W
W
S
N
w 635 F
N w
o�H�—
630 CA 04
ra
625 N u 0,,
00 aASDD xe
s� � QD,NEEQ' �trrar
620 rOPnERR.a� c ~
E 14+50 15+50 1 6+00

III, I ,
AAgo4 a m
tiNp + ��'
-
^ s >°
° ° SEE SHEET 6..4 STA. 16+00 �,� ga pM Iv �
p FAT G
�s m � � f $1' � ,� S %q• %
6X00
X
/ � J
�1 .11 rBBi Bri A /
SIR
111,1Z NZ
i' I
SDE
Alph
SDE
ZL
}�
o �
\\ AA :i
/
p
�'4 � \
'
j
7
o N o SEE SHEET 6.6 STA. 20 +50 SEE SHEET 6.6 STA. 20 +50
,
R,
�
Z Z
a 1 4 12 g
R• Ris L" Ri a' A l ls7 0
dtiN�uun hl til C d �p
loll Aga
q Asia
nnloll
SMT CHEROKEE / SCOTLAND nD DA�i by u 7uriwn
6.5 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT J0BN0 �`"`� aD+�+ ► CPO 'mng°'w Dewberry'
PROJECT [� R� '° C�
ceDVnErcni Ul V1�171 a an nnunrr N.C. REGISTRATION P F -0878
OF PLAN AND PROFILE Imm'�■'N1' —�V` & Dade Inc.
r2�W�A"ED BY (7Rtl(FD BY a WX '
SCOTLAND AVENUE aoa�_ m 10m� STA. 16+00 TO 20+50 P,D,1 DATE FM MM em�
m
x
TO
g• g
00
y
� F. V;
Z,� K
pp
2O j µSS
za
VIM Fe
f
1;
~
I
I
Rd
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
i
I
p FAT G
�s m � � f $1' � ,� S %q• %
6X00
X
/ � J
�1 .11 rBBi Bri A /
SIR
111,1Z NZ
i' I
SDE
Alph
SDE
ZL
}�
o �
\\ AA :i
/
p
�'4 � \
'
j
7
o N o SEE SHEET 6.6 STA. 20 +50 SEE SHEET 6.6 STA. 20 +50
,
R,
�
Z Z
a 1 4 12 g
R• Ris L" Ri a' A l ls7 0
dtiN�uun hl til C d �p
loll Aga
q Asia
nnloll
SMT CHEROKEE / SCOTLAND nD DA�i by u 7uriwn
6.5 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT J0BN0 �`"`� aD+�+ ► CPO 'mng°'w Dewberry'
PROJECT [� R� '° C�
ceDVnErcni Ul V1�171 a an nnunrr N.C. REGISTRATION P F -0878
OF PLAN AND PROFILE Imm'�■'N1' —�V` & Dade Inc.
r2�W�A"ED BY (7Rtl(FD BY a WX '
SCOTLAND AVENUE aoa�_ m 10m� STA. 16+00 TO 20+50 P,D,1 DATE FM MM em�