20061565 Ver 2_401 Application_20180518

1 Dewberry
ANSMITTAL
DATE: 5/14/2018 PROJECT #: 50079798
PROJECT NAME: White Oak Lake Reconstruction Project
REFERENCE: 401 & Buffer Permitting PCN Submittal
TO: Karen Higgins
NC DWQ-401 & Buffer Permitting Unit
512 North Salisbury Street, 9th floor
PHONE:
Raleigh, NC 27604 v �.
CC: David Kiker, File
U As per your request
U Prints
® Your approval
❑ Under separate cover
® Copies
® Your review and comment
❑ By mail
❑ Reports
❑ Your file/use
® By messenger
❑ Studies
❑ Revision and submission
❑ By pick up
❑ Reproducible
❑ Distribution
❑ By overnight carrier
❑ Product literature
❑ Email
❑ Shop Drawings
4 5/11/18 401 & Buffer Permitting PCN Submittal Checklist
4 5/11/18 PCN Form
4 USGS map and Soils Map
4 5/11/18 Exhibits —stream impacts, buffer limits, buffer impacts
4 5/11/18 Vicinity map and overall site plan (shts C1, C16, C20 & C22)
4 10/6/2006 Previous DWQ Approval
4 10/24/2005 Previous USACE Approval
& 2/5/2008
4 7/24/2017 Preliminary Jurisdictional Delineation & Exhibit revision
& 8/28/17
1 5/9/18 Application Fee, Check # 106503 (Amount: $240.00)
This a project that was permitted and not built. The project is realigning the existing dam out of NCDOT right
of way and removing and replacing sanitary sewer and improving the failing spillways from the lake as noted
in the PCN and additional information sheet included. Please feel free to contact me with any questions or
concerns about the permit application and package.
Pamela Kistner, PE, 919.424.3726
[e-mail]
If enclosures are not as noted, please notify us at once

V Dewberry
404 Permitting, 401
Water Quality
Certification & Buffer
Authorization (PCN)
Submittal
City of Raleigh — White Oak Lake Reconstruction Project
SM 2018-0006
Dewberry Project Number: 50079798
May 2018
SUBMITTED BY:
Dewberry Engineers Inc.
2610 Wycliff Road
Suite 410
Raleigh NC 27607
919.881.9939
NC License No.: F-0929
SUBMITTED T0:
NC Division of Water
Resources-WBSCP Unit
512 North Salisbury Street -
91h Floor
Raleigh, NC

TABLE OF CONTENTS
Section A 401 & Buffer Permitting PCN Submittal Checklist
Section B Pre -Construction Notification (PCN) Form
Section C USGS and Soils Maps
Section D Exhibits
Section E Existing Conditions Plan, Overall Site Plan & Vicinity Map
Section F Previous Approval Letters (404 & 401/Buffer)
Section G Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination Request by Dewberry Engineers
Inc. dated July 24, 2017 and wetland exhibit revised August 25, 2017

SECTION A - 401 & BUFFER PERMITTING PCN SUBMITTAL
CHECKLIST

Version 1.4
January 9, 2009
401 & Buffer Permitting PCN Submittal Checklist
® The application fee (Checks may be made out to "N.C. Division of Water Resources"
$240.00 for 401 Water Quality Certification with minor impacts
$570.00 for 401 Water Quality Certification with major impacts
Express Review Fee (Amount requested on Acceptance Letter)
® Four (4) complete and collated copies of the PCN Application and supporting
documentation (instead of providing 4 copies of the full size plans you may provide two
copies of full size plans along with two copies of 11 X 17 plans)
NA Stormwater Management Plan (if applicable — see PCN Form Help File Section E)
1) Please provide three (3) copies of the stormwater management plans along with all
supporting information pertaining to this project including the following:
a. Entire site development/layout plans delineating all drainage areas;
b. Design calculation sheets for all proposed BMP(s) sized for both on-site and
off-site drainage;
c. BMP supplements for each proposed BMP and Required Items Check List
(http://portal.ncdenr.org/web/Ir/bmp-manual) along with all required items;
d. A Notarized Operation & Maintenance Agreement for each stormwater
management facility;
e. Detailed construction drawing sheets shall include
(i) Erosion and sediment control plans;
(ii) Installation and planting schedules for the proposed BMPs;
(iii) Appropriately scaled plan views and cross sectional details of all
BMPs and associated components — inlet and outlet structures,
forebay, respective zones and pertinent elevations.
NA If your project is located within a State implemented Riparian Buffer Rule Area, submit the
following along with site plans and PCN form:
1) Three (3) copies of the details for on-site diffuse flow provisions, (refer to
http://Portal.ncdenr.org/web/Ir/bmp-manual).
® DWR Stream Determination Forms for streams on property and DWR determination
letter for wetlands or streams (if applicable).
The following is the most critical of all the information that you must provide. The quality and
detail of the information will often determine the expeditiousness of the review. The following is
a checklist of the types of pertinent information required at a minimum:
Maps and Plans:
® The most recent version of the 1:24,000 USGS Topographic Map - Please cleanly draw or
delineate the site boundaries on the topographic map.
® The most recent version of the bound and published County NRCS Soil Survey Map -
(required for projects within the Neuse River Basin, Tar -Pamlico River Basin, Randleman
Lake Watershed and the Catawba River Basin, also recommended for all projects) -
Please clearly delineate the site boundaries, etc. on the map. If the delineation obscures
any of the features, it is recommended that a clean copy be provided. Copies of the

Version 1.4
January 9, 2009
current soil survey and/or soil survey map sheets can be obtained from the local NRCS
County Office (http://www.nc.nres.usda.gov/). GIS soil layers are not acceptable.
® Vicinity map - Please clearly mark the location and approximate boundaries of the property
and project on the map. Please indicate north arrow and scale. Please include applicable
road names or State Road numbers.
® The Site Plan - The most critical map to be provided is the site plan. You must provide full
sized plans. The following is the minimum list of plans that are typically needed.
® Pre-construction/Pre-existing conditions - This sheet (or sheets) must include:
• All jurisdictional and non -jurisdictional wetland, stream, water features, State regulated
buffers (delineated into Zones 1 and 2)
• Topographic contours with elevations
• Any existing structures and impervious areas
• Existing utility lines and easements
• Existing roads, culverts, and other pertinent features
• North arrow and the scale (1":50' scale is recommended).
® Proposed conditions - This sheet (or sheets) must include:
• All jurisdictional and non -jurisdictional wetland, stream, water features, State regulated
buffers (delineated into Zones 1 and 2)
• Lot layout (if a subdivision or commercial development is proposed) - lots must be
developable without further impacts to jurisdictional and non -jurisdictional wetlands,
streams water features, and State regulated buffers. Building envelopes must be
provided when streams, wetlands, riparian buffers, or water features exist on a lot
• All built -out structures and impervious cover
• Final grading contours with elevations
• All utilities and easements (including septic fields on all lots within 100 feet of stream,
wetland, or water features - if applicable)
• Impacted areas — these should correspond with the Impact numbers listed on your PCN
form.
® Drainage Plans - Final drainage plans must include the following:
• Locations and pertinent elevations and sizes of the stormwater collection system and
drainage ways
• All inlets and outlets must also be shown with pertinent elevations (All outlets to
wetlands must be at a non-erosive velocity, generally less than 2 ft/sec during the peak
flow from the 10 -yr storm)
• Scaled stormwater BMPs must also be indicated as required by DWR rules and policies
• In certain cases (see Section E of PCN form), final stormwater management plans must
also be provided (see Stormwater Management Plan Checklist)
® Proposed Impacts - All impacts to jurisdictional and non -jurisdictional wetland, stream,
water features, and State regulated buffers must be shown and labeled on the site plans at
a scale no smaller than 1" = 50'. All excavation, fill, flooding, stabilization, and other impacts
that will be conducted in or near jurisdictional and non -jurisdictional wetland, stream, water
features, and State regulated buffers must be indicated. Please provide cross sectional
details showing the provisions for aquatic life passage (burial of culvert 20% for culverts <_ 48
inches, and 1 -foot for culverts > 48 inches).

Version 1.4
January 9, 2009
Wetland Impacts:
® Precise grading and final elevation contours must be provided. Existing
vegetation and any clearing must be specified.
® All subsurface utility lines must indicate the location of anti -seep collars.
Construction detail for anti -seep collars must be provided.
NA Roadway or other crossings of riparian wetlands may require floodway culverts to
maintain existing hydrological conditions.
® Plans should show that the hydrology of remaining wetlands on the site will be
maintained.
Stream Impacts:
® Stream impacts must be clearly shown on the plans. The centerline as well as
the banks of the stream must be surveyed or located by GPS for the portion of
the stream to be impacted.
® The inlet and the outlet of all culverts should be aligned with the stream as
much as possible. Inlet and outlet elevations and streambed elevations should
be indicated. Any inlet or outlet protection must be shown and enumerated on
the impact map(s).
NA For bottomless culverts or other spans, a vertical cross section should be
provided that shows the minimum distance from each span to each stream bank,
the stream cross section, the height of the span above the stream and the
minimum distance from the edge of each footer to each stream bank.
Additionally, please provide a signed and sealed geotechnical report of
subsurface soils at the proposed bottomless culvert location. The report must
comply with the Division of Highways — Guidelines for Drainage Studies and
Hydraulic Design, prepared by A.L. Hankins, Jr., State Hydraulics Engineer -
1999.
NA Multiple culverts or sectioned box culverts typically require the use of sills, off-
setting or other means to match the cross section of the existing stream (in order
to maintain stream stability and provide aquatic life passage). A vertical cross
section of the culverts should be shown overlain with the up and downstream
stream cross section including the stream flood -prone area.
® Impacts associated with dam construction must indicate and enumerate all fill
associated with the dam footprint, spillway and any bank stream bank
stabilization. The length of stream impounded must also be indicated and
enumerated.

SECTION B - PRE -CONSTRUCTION NOTIFICATION (PCN) FORM

o lqiii� <
Office Use Only:
Corps action ID no.
DWQ project no.
Form Version 1.4 January 2009
Page 1 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009
Pre -Construction Notification (PCN) Form
A.
Applicant Information
1.
Processing
1a.
Type(s) of approval sought from the Corps:
❑x Section 404 Permit ❑ Section 10 Permit
1b. Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number: NW 3 &13 or General Permit (GP) number:
1 c.
Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps?
❑x Yes ❑ No
1 d.
Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply):
❑x 401 Water Quality Certification — Regular ❑ Non -404 Jurisdictional General Permit
❑ 401 Water Quality Certification — Express ❑X Riparian Buffer Authorization
1 e.
Is this notification solely for the record
because written approval is not required?
For the record only for DWQ
401 Certification:
❑ Yes ❑X No
For the record only for Corps Permit:
❑ Yes ❑x No
1f.
Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for
mitigation of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank
or in -lieu fee program.
❑ Yes ❑x No
1g.
Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties. If yes, answer 1h
below.
❑ Yes ❑x No
1h.
Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)?
❑ Yes ❑X No
2.
Project Information
2a.
Name of project:
White Oak Lake Reconstruction Project
2b.
County:
Wake
2c.
Nearest municipality / town:
Raleigh
2d. Subdivision name:
Cardinal Hills
2e.
NCDOT only, T.I.P. or state project no:
N/A
3.
Owner Information
3a. Name(s) on Recorded Deed:
White Oak Lake Inc & Helen G. Stevens
3b.
Deed Book and Page No.
DB5360 pg 00241
3c.
Responsible Party (for LLC if
applicable):
William Stevens
3d. Street address:
1001 Ravenwood Drive & 5201 Hawksbury Lane
3e.
City, state, zip:
Raleigh, NC
3f.
Telephone no.:
3g.
Fax no.:
3h.
Email address:
Page 1 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

4. Applicant Information (if different from owner)
4a. Applicant is:
❑x Agent ❑ Other, specify:
4b. Name:
Blair Hinkle, PE
4c. Business name
(if applicable):
City of Raleigh Engineering Services Department - Stormwater Management
4d. Street address:
127 West Hargett Street, 8th Floor
4e. City, state, zip:
Raleigh, NC 27601
4f. Telephone no.:
919-996-3940
4g. Fax no.:
4h. Email address:
j [e-mail]
5. Agent/Consultant Information (if applicable)
5a. Name:
Rajaraman Jayakrishnan, PE
5b. Business name
(if applicable):
Dewberry Engineers Inc
5c. Street address:
2610 Wycliff Road, Suite 410
5d. City, state, zip:
Raleigh NC 27607
5e. Telephone no.:
919-424-3714
5f. Fax no.:
919-881-9923
5g. Email address:
[e-mail]
Page 2 of 10

B. Project Information and Prior Project History
1. Property Identification
1a. Property identification no. (tax PIN or parcel ID):
0783473763 & 0783475677
1 b. Site coordinates (in decimal degrees):
ILatitude: 35.77598 Longitude: -78.71529
1 c. Property size:
13.55 acres
2. Surface Waters
2a. Name of nearest body of water to proposed project:
White Oak Lake/Cramer Lake
2b. Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water:
C;NSW
2c. River basin:
Neuse River
3. Project Description
3a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this
application:
Existing dam outlet structure has failed and the existing overflow spillway has become the outlet which is eroded and failing. The level of the lake is
at the spillway elevation due to the outlet failure. The water then flows in an eroded channel to an existing 8'X 7' box culvert under US Highway 1.
3b. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property: 3.14
3c. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property: 631
3d. Explain the purpose of the proposed project:
The project will reduce the risk of finished floor flooding in residential houses downstream of lake and dam for the 2 -year 24-hour ... see attached.
3e. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
The project includes reuse of the existing lake, reorientation of dam with new primary and overflow spillways, grading and dredging. See attached.
4. Jurisdictional Determinations
4a. Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the
Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property /
project (includingall prior phases)in the past?
❑x Yes ❑ No ❑ Unknown
Comments:
4b. If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination, what type
of determination was made?
❑x Preliminary ❑ Final
4c. If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas?
Name (if known): Troy Shelton
Agency/Consultant Company: Dewberry Engineers Inc
Other: USAGE
4d. If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation.
PDJ Request on 07/24/2017 with an updated wetland exhibit dated 08/28/2017. Report and exhibits are attached.
5. Project History
5a. Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for
this project (including all prior phases) in the past?
FAI Yes ❑ No ❑ Unknown
5b. If yes, explain in detail according to "help file" instructions.
Project was designed and permitted in 2005, 2006, and 2008. The approval letters are attached.
6. Future Project Plans
6a. Is this a phased project?
Yes ❑ No
6b. If yes, explain.
This is the third phase to reduce the flooding along Simmons Branch. Phase 2 is a culvert maintenance and stream stabilization that is under
construction and received 401 & Buffer Authorization on August 7, 2017 and General Permit Verification from USACOE on August 16, 2017.
Page 3 of 10
PCN Form - Version 1.4 January 2009

C. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
1 a. Which sections were completed below for your project (check all that apply):
❑x Wetlands Streams — tributaries 0 Buffers Q Open Waters ❑ Pond Construction
2. Wetland Impacts
If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted.
2a.
2b.
2c.
2d.
2e. •
2f.
Wetland impact
Type of impact
Type of wetland
Forested
Type of jurisdiction
Area of
number
Corps (404,10) or
impact
Permanent (P) or
DWQ (401, other)
(acres)
Temporary T
W1 P
Grading
Non -Tidal Freshwater Marsh
Yes
Corps
0.07
W2 T
replace sanitary sewer
Non -Tidal Freshwater Marsh
No
Corps
0.29
W3
Choose one
Choose one
Yes/No
W4
Choose one
Choose one
Yes/No
-
W5
Choose one
Choose one
Yes/No
W6
Choose one
Choose one
Yes/No
2g. Total Wetland Impacts:
0.36
2h. Comments:
This project realigns the existing dam and constructs a new primary spillway structure and overflow spillway, removes and replaces existing sanitary
sewer pipes along the eastern side of the lake and regrades the bottom of the lake and additional grading required for dam and structures to be
constructed, as well as required maintenance access. The wetlands along the fringe of the lake will be removed due to grading. See attached.
3. Stream Impacts
If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this
question for all stream sites impacted.
3a.
3b.
3c.
3d.
3e.
3f.
3g.
Stream impact
Type of impact
Stream name
Perennial (PER) or
Type of
Average
Impact
number
intermittent (INT)?
jurisdiction
stream
length
Permanent (P) or
width
(linear
Temporary (T)
(feet)
feet)
S1 P
Dam construction
Simmons Branch
PER
Corps
10
139
S2 T
Stabilization
Simmons Branch
PER
Corps
10
54
S3
Choose one
S4
Choose one
S5
Choose one
S6
Choose one
3h. Total stream and tributary impacts
193
3i. Comments:
The reorientation of the earthen dam with the construction of the primary spillway and the overflow spillway will impact the perennial stream that has
formed since the existing spillways failed and the overflow became the main outlet of the lake. The stream banks are currently unstable and
extremely eroded with steep side slopes. See attached.
Page 4 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

4. Open Water Impacts
If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of
the U.S. then indivi ually list all open water impacts below.
4a.
Open water
impact number
Permanent (P) or
Temporary T
4b.
Name of waterbody
(if applicable)
4c.
Type of impact
4d.
Waterbody
type
4e.
Area of impact (acres)
01 P
White Oak Lake/Lake Cramer
Dam repair & reorientation/grading
Lake
2.70
02
Choose one
Choose
03
Choose one
Choose
04
Choose one
Choose
4f. Total open water impacts
2.70
4g. Comments: As part of the dam reorientation and reconstruction, new primary spillway and new overflow spillway, the existing lake bottom and
edges will be regraded. A ten (10) foot wide wetland bench will be constructed around the perimeter of the ... see attached.
5. Pond or Lake Construction
If pond or lake construction proposed, the complete the chart below.
5a.
Pond ID number
5b.
Proposed use or
purpose of pond
5c.
Wetland Impacts (acres)
5d.
Stream Impacts (feet)
5e.
Upland
(acres)
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
P1
Choose one
P2
Choose one
5f. Total:
5g. Comments:
5h. Is a dam high hazard permit required?
❑ Yes ❑ No If yes, permit ID no:
5i. Expected pond surface area (acres):
5j. Size of pond watershed (acres):
5k. Method of construction:
6. Buffer Impacts (for DWQ)
If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below. If yes, then individually list all buffer impacts
below. If any impacts require mitigation. then vou MUST fill out Section D of this form.
6a. Project is in which protected basin?
Q Neuse ❑ Tar -Pamlico ❑ Catawba ❑ Randleman ❑ Other:
6b.
Buffer Impact
number -
Permanent (P) or
Temporary T
6c.
Reason for impact
6d.
Stream name
6e.
Buffer
mitigation
required?
6f.
Zone 1
impact
(square
feet)
6g.
Zone 2
impact
(square
feet
B1 P
Reorientation of dam
Simmons Branch
No
11650
4230
B2 T
Grading
Simmons Branch
No
2760
970
B3 T
San. sewer replacment
Simmons Branch
No
16430
8660
B4 T
Pump around
Simmons Branch
No
5330
1510
65 T
Access path/laydown
Simmons Branch
No
3380
4410
B6
Yes/No
6h. Total Buffer Impacts:
39550
19780
6i. Comments: Buffer impact cannot be avoided due to the reorientation of the dam and the new primary and emergency spillways. The nature of
the construction in an existing residential area with existing utilities also influences the impacts. Areas will be revegetated.
Page 5 of 10

D. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
1 a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project.
The lake and dam is located in a residential area. The existing streams are constrained by residential housing one side and roadways on other sides
(1440 & Ravenwood Drive). The reorientation and improvements to the dam will repair the components not functioning properly. The construction
access to the project is along existing sanitary sewer easements, water easements, drainage easements, access easements... see attached.
1 b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques.
In order to minimize the environmental impacts during construction the existing overflow will remain in services as much as possible. Coffer dams
and pump arounds will be used to isolate areas of construction in the dry while maintaining the flow of water as well as diverting water through two 48'
RCPs that will have their outlet end in the existing stream.
2. Compensatory Miti ation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for
impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State?
❑ Yes ❑X No
2b. If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply):
❑ DWQ ❑ Corps
2c. If yes, which mitigation option will be used for this
project?
❑ Mitigation bank
❑Payment to in -lieu fee program
❑ Permittee Responsible Mitigation
3. Complete if Usina a Mitigation Bank
3a. Name of Mitigation Bank:
3b. Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter)
Type: Choose one
Type: Choose one
Type: Choose one
Quantity:
Quantity:
Quantity:
3c. Comments:
4. Complete if MakInA a Payment to In -lieu Fee Program
4a. Approval letter from in -lieu fee program is attached.
❑ Yes
4b. Stream mitigation requested:
linear feet
4c. If using stream mitigation, stream temperature:
Choose one
4d. Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only):
square feet
4e. Riparian wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4f. Non -riparian wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4g. Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4h. Comments:
5. Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
5a. If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan.
Page 6 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

6. Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) — required by DWQ
6a. Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires
buffer mitigation?
Yes Q No
6b. If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation. Calculate the
amount of mitigation required.
Zone
6c.
Reason for impact
6d.
Total impact
(square feet)
Multiplier
6e.
Required mitigation
(square feet)
Zone 1
3 (2 for Catawba)
Zone 2
1.5
6f. Total buffer mitigation required:
6g. If -buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e.g., payment to private mitigation bank,
permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in -lieu fee fund).
6h. Comments:
Page 7 of 10

E.
Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ)
1.
Diffuse Flow Plan
1 a.
Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified
Yes ❑ No
within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
1 b.
If yes, then is a diffuse flow plan included? If no, explain why.
The existing stromwater discharges are exempt under 15A NCAC 02B .0233. All of these systems were
❑ Yes ❑X No
in place before July 22, 1997, so they are exempt from this requirement.
2.
Stormwater Management Plan
2a.
What is the overall percent imperviousness of this project?
2b.
Does this project require a Stormwater Management Plan?
❑ Yes 0 No
2c.
If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why:
This is an existing dam and lake maintenance and stream bank stabilization project. The overall impervious
area will be decreased. This is a
maintenance project in an established neighborhood that was built in the late 1950s and early 1960s. All stormwater discharges to Simmons Branch
(White Oak Lake) are considered existing since they were in place before July 22, 1997 and are exempt from the diffused flow criteria.
2d.
If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan, then provide a brief, narrative description of the plan:
2e.
Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan?
NA
3.
Certified Local Government Stormwater Review
3a.
In which localgovernment's jurisdiction is thisproject?
City of Raleigh
❑ Phase II
❑ NSW
3b.
Which of the following locally -implemented stormwater management programs
n USMP
apply (check all that apply):
❑ Water Supply Watershed
❑ Other:
3c.
Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
❑ Yes [E No
attached?
4.
DWQ Stormwater Program Review
❑Coastal counties
❑HQW
4a.
Which of the following state -implemented stormwater management programs apply
❑ORW
(check all that apply):
E] Session Law 2006-246
❑ Other:
4b.
Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
❑ Yes ❑ No
attached?
5.
DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review
5a.
Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements?
❑ Yes ❑ No
5b.
Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met?
❑ Yes ❑ No
Page 8 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

F.
Supplementary Information
1.
Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement)
1 a.
Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the
0 Yes
❑ No
use of public (federal/state) land?
1 b.
If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an
environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State
❑Yes
No
(North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
1 c.
If you answered "yes" to the above, has the document review been finalized by the
State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval
F] Yes
C] No
letter.)
Comments:
2.
Violations (DWQ Requirement)
2a.
Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated
Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards,
❑Yes
Q No
or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)?
2b.
Is this an after -the -fact permit application?
El Yes
Q No
2c.
If you answered "yes" to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s):
3.
Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement)
3a.
Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in
El Yes
Q No
additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?
3b.
If you answered "yes" to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the
most recent DWQ policy. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
4.
Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement)
4a. Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non -discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from
the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
NA
Page 9 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or
❑ Yes No
habitat?
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act
E] Yes Q No
impacts?
5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted.
-
5d. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical
Habitat?
www.saw.usace.army.mil?wetland/easa
https:Hgis 13. services.ncdot.govlesm/
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat?
❑ Yes QX No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat?
ocean.floridamarine.org/efh—coral/ims/viewer.htm
hftps://gisl3.services.ncdot.gov/esm/
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal
governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation
E] YesXQ No
status (e.g., National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in
North Carolina history and archaeology)?
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?
www.hpo.dcr.state.nc.us
hftps://gisl3.services.ncdot.gov/esm/
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA -designated 100 -year floodplain?
❑ Yes © No
8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements:
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination?
Zone X on FEMA - FIRM Map Number: 3720078300J, panel effective date 5/2/2006
Blair Hinkle, PE
,
►`� 1
-�
Applicant/Agent's Printed Name
Date
Applican gent's Signature
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization
letter from the applicant isprovided.)
Page 10 of 10

Additional Information from PCN (April 2018):
B. Project Information and Prior Project History
3. Project Description
3d ... and 10 -year 24-hour storm events. Though flood control is the primary objective for the City of
Raleigh, other goals of the project include improving downstream conditions, meeting dam safety
standards, and planning for future NCDOT roadway projects. The White Oak Lake spillway is currently in
disrepair and does not function properly. The primary spillway consists of four (4) undersized CMP pipes
that are corroded, crushed and blocked. Therefore, the emergency spillway has become the primary
spillway conveying flow during the majority of storm events. Over time the emergency concrete weir
spillway has cracked and broken into large sections of rubble in several locations. In addition to
attenuating floods, and dam safety, the lake will be reconstructed outside the 1-440 beltline proposed
right -of way for widened next to White Oak Lake. NCDOT has indicated to the City of Raleigh that the 1-
440 beltline near White Oak Lake will be widened to a 6 -lane divided highway. The new dam will be
realigned and rebuilt to meet the latest NC dam safety regulations. The White Oak Lake Reconstruction
Project will decrease flooding downstream, meet North Carolina's Dam Safety standards and allow for
future roadway improvements by NCDOT.
3e ... and removal of sediment. The project will also remove and replace existing sanitary sewer along the
eastern side of the lake. The project will remove and replace the existing earthen dam, reorienting the
dam and providing a new primary spillway and emergency overflow spillway. The existing lake will be
rehabilitated and dredged to remove sediment/silt and allow the lake to have a constant bottom elevation
and detain flows during storm events with a shallow wetland shelf around the perimeter of the lake. The
lake outfall will have a concrete plunge pool that ties into existing stream that will be re — stabilized.
C. Proposed Impacts Inventory
2. Wetland Impacts
2h. The project will be revegetated and will allow for expansion of the wetland on the north end. The
project will improve the downstream water quality and should have minimal environmental effects. The
existing wetland/marsh area on the northwest side of the lake will remain unchanged, no disturbance will
take place on that end. However, the project overall should increase the wetland on the north end. Once
the dam has been realigned and the new primary and overflow spillways are constructed, no additional
changes are planned for this area.
3. Stream Impacts
3i. The existing stream has created a plunge pool from the velocities and volume of water. It was
determined that in order to stabilize the banks with the existing sanitary sewer easement running along
the north side of the channel that the new emergency overflow spillway will be concrete with a retaining
wall along the sanitary sewer easement. A plunge pool will be constructed at the end of the emergency
overflow spillway and riprap will be imbedded in the bottom of the stream for erosion protection to prevent
scour and erosion. The proposed reconstruction of the dam and spill ways will mimic the intent of the
existing drainage that has failed.
4. Open Water Impacts
4g. ...lake improvements. The reorientation of the dam will reduce the size of the lake as well as the
adjustment of the water level with the new primary spillway not being that the emergency overflow
elevation.

D. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
la .... electrical easements, and a private road. Utilizing existing easements and areas that are relatively
cleared will minimize impacts. The improvements will include bank and slope stabilization. All other area
will be re -vegetated for natural stabilization and regrowth. The reoriented dam emergency overflow
spillway will follow the existing stream edge for approximately 50 feet and the flatter tie in grades along
the existing sanitary sewer easement should minimize erosion upon revegetation.

SECTION C - USGS AND SOILS MAPS

'--MEREDITH sr
Ll
�� � yc -t7 �
BARRINGERDR
I$ N
77
RA
VENWOOD DT
7 �\ I
ASHBURTON-RD-"

35° 46 39" N
35° 46 29'N
3 Soil Map—Wake County, North Carolina 3
M (White Oak Lake) H
v a
R 35° 46 39" N
_K
X75
70629D 706340 706390 706440 706490 706540 70659D 706640 706690 706740 706790
3 3
a ry
Rp, Map Scale: 1:2,510 if printed on A landscape (11" x 8.5') sheet. v
N 70 140 210 Meters
Feet
0 100 200 400 600
Map projection: Web Mercator Caner coordinates: WGS84 Edge tics: U1M Zone 17N WGS84
USDA Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 6/26/2017
i" Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 1 of 3
35° 46 28" N

MAP LEGEND
Area of Interest (AOI)
F7 Area of Interest (AOI)
Soils
Soil Map—Wake County, North Carolina
(White Oak Lake)
Spoil Area
Stony Spot
Very Stony Spot
Wet Spot
Other
.� Special Line Features
Water Features
Streams and Canals
Transportation
4-4-+ Rails
s Interstate Highways
US Routes
Major Roads
Local Roads
Background
N Aerial Photography
MAP INFORMATION
The soil surveys that comprise your AOI were mapped at
1:15,800.
Warning: Soil Map may not be valid at this scale.
Enlargement of maps beyond the scale of mapping can cause
misunderstanding of the detail of mapping and accuracy of soil
line placement. The maps do not show the small areas of
contrasting soils that could have been shown at a more detailed
scale.
Please rely on the bar scale on each map sheet for map
measurements.
Source of Map: Natural Resources Conservation Service
Web Soil Survey URL:
Coordinate System: Web Mercator (EPSG:3857)
Maps from the Web Soil Survey are based on the Web Mercator
projection, which preserves direction and shape but distorts
distance and area. A projection that preserves area, such as the
Albers equal-area conic projection, should be used if more
accurate calculations of distance or area are required.
This product is generated from the USDA-NRCS certified data as
of the version date(s) listed below.
Soil Survey Area: Wake County, North Carolina
Survey Area Data: Version 15, Sep 19, 2016
Soil map units are labeled (as space allows) for map scales
1:50,000 or larger.
Date(s) aerial images were photographed: Data not available.
The orthophoto or other base map on which the soil lines were
compiled and digitized probably differs from the background
imagery displayed on these maps. As a result, some minor
shifting of map unit boundaries may be evident.
USDA Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 6/26/2017
�r Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 2 of 3
Soil Map Unit Polygons
.F
Soil Map Unit Lines
13
Soil Map Unit Points
Special
Point Features
wo
Blowout
Borrow Pit
Clay Spot
Closed Depression
Gravel Pit
Gravelly Spot
Landfill
Lava Flow
Marsh or swamp
Mine or Quarry
Miscellaneous Water
9
Perennial Water
Rock Outcrop
+
Saline Spot
4
Sandy Spot
Severely Eroded Spot
e5
Sinkhole
Slide or Slip
Sodic Spot
Soil Map—Wake County, North Carolina
(White Oak Lake)
Spoil Area
Stony Spot
Very Stony Spot
Wet Spot
Other
.� Special Line Features
Water Features
Streams and Canals
Transportation
4-4-+ Rails
s Interstate Highways
US Routes
Major Roads
Local Roads
Background
N Aerial Photography
MAP INFORMATION
The soil surveys that comprise your AOI were mapped at
1:15,800.
Warning: Soil Map may not be valid at this scale.
Enlargement of maps beyond the scale of mapping can cause
misunderstanding of the detail of mapping and accuracy of soil
line placement. The maps do not show the small areas of
contrasting soils that could have been shown at a more detailed
scale.
Please rely on the bar scale on each map sheet for map
measurements.
Source of Map: Natural Resources Conservation Service
Web Soil Survey URL:
Coordinate System: Web Mercator (EPSG:3857)
Maps from the Web Soil Survey are based on the Web Mercator
projection, which preserves direction and shape but distorts
distance and area. A projection that preserves area, such as the
Albers equal-area conic projection, should be used if more
accurate calculations of distance or area are required.
This product is generated from the USDA-NRCS certified data as
of the version date(s) listed below.
Soil Survey Area: Wake County, North Carolina
Survey Area Data: Version 15, Sep 19, 2016
Soil map units are labeled (as space allows) for map scales
1:50,000 or larger.
Date(s) aerial images were photographed: Data not available.
The orthophoto or other base map on which the soil lines were
compiled and digitized probably differs from the background
imagery displayed on these maps. As a result, some minor
shifting of map unit boundaries may be evident.
USDA Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 6/26/2017
�r Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 2 of 3

Soil Map—Wake County, North Carolina
Map Unit Legend
White Oak Lake
iiNatural Resources Web Soil Survey 6/26/2017
Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 3 of 3
Wake County, North Carolina (NC183)
Map Unit Symbol
Map Unit Name
Acres in AOI
Percent of AOI
CeC2
Cecil sandy loam, 6 to 10
0.4:I
3.4%:
percent slopes, moderately
eroded
CeD
Cecil sandy loam, 10 to 15
3.9
32.5%
percent slopes
CgC2
Cecil gravelly sandy loam, 6 to
0.3
2.8%',
10 percent slopes,
moderately eroded
CmA
Chewacla sandy loam, 0 to 2
0.31
2.6%
percent slopes, frequently
flooded
W
Water
6.1
50.4%
WoA
Wehadkee and Bibb soils, 0 to
1.01
8.2%
2 percent slopes, frequently
flooded
Totals for Area of Interest
12.1
100.0%
iiNatural Resources Web Soil Survey 6/26/2017
Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 3 of 3

SECTION D - EXHIBITS

K ez9 RnNfHt9oai as N
I �
83389250
�KCD4DL MARJORY IHN a �Y a�/r � � �
900 RAVENW000 DR ` \ \ `I/ �r wr. ac \\
909 RAYENWOW Oft
`L \ AIE�LBOUR VL, R(J. D
I -- -
---�-_�___
07633Bi002 mAaerz aura�r `` `\ b"/BJ982019
908 RR. MARY (RAV XURN J
908 4nVENWOW DR 1 'w�`\; Zz) MEIDIXIRNE RC 0]8318201♦ I
,t yQ BLpgC 111LL1My J r 0)BJ1)i926 14 DHA4920
\ \ / 522) MaaW.E RO ­­
IAI ELIMZABEIH A DAVEr, MARtEs 8 4
(}, VET. 'ZABE- A
-2 I 5219 MEIBWRNE RD 5219 MELBOURNE RD
37
839803 (
KEEN.07CYNTHIA 9HARPE
II 9r2 RA'RtiNW00D
I 09 T\� _ PUMP AROIMD
SHARPE, RD BB
RE ROBERT A a
SN PE ALICE AREA: 5=0 SIF
916 RAVENWDDD DR
IER, KASMLEEN ANNE a�
GREYER. BRIM SRIWR
C2I5�IBWRNE R.
PUMPAROUND
AWk-11
G)&1J7B]85
L6E5. GIXtn G
920 RAVENW000 DR
1�.::� llt',t AR9„aW�arN�
BENCHMARK
N:739106.85
E: 2085041.51
EL = 435.37
60d NAIL IN GUTTER
NOTE: 100 YEAR NESE =404.70' NAYD 88
15
cc)
U
V)
W
U
�
6D 0 JO 60 120
NnDw what's below.
cr cr
1 0
Q
Of
L1
N
C7
Z
-- _ -- - -
BREWiF, JOKN C a 1
5211 ELBOURNE RD BREWER, MMY K INOWfl4
0]834)9908
HAZEL PERRIT7
w
i
bre
5207 MELBOURNE RD
5201 MEIBWRNE RO
i
—fit—
W
PERMANENT IMPACT
TEMPORARY IMPACT -GRADING
TEMPORARY IMPACT -PUMP AROUND
ply
TEMPORARY IMPACT -ACCESSISTAGING
\ � �
CNRS, OLGA DDA S
DR
TEMPORARY IMPACT- SS REMOVE/REPLACE
0]834')'
BENCHMARK / 1
N: 738049.70
E: 2085414.75
EL.=j2kg
S
'
EBERT, JOAN a85DAIS
5206 NAWKEBURTW
--------
�
L
--
lar to
I
N
'L4
• - ACCESWSTAGING
AREA: 2,280
AC REk DTAGIGING
PG40SF
RE0.
0183479107
FlSH. MWAM D aJ-E
9,0 POWELL OP
T i
(
i
!
NOTE: 100 YEAR NESE =404.70' NAYD 88
15
cc)
U
V)
W
U
�
6D 0 JO 60 120
NnDw what's below.
cr cr
1 0
Q
Of
L1
N
C7
Z
Gall before you dig.
1 INCH 60 FEET
,'' z
O
w
U
Z
—fit—
W
PERMANENT IMPACT
TEMPORARY IMPACT -GRADING
TEMPORARY IMPACT -PUMP AROUND
ply
TEMPORARY IMPACT -ACCESSISTAGING
0
U
TEMPORARY IMPACT- SS REMOVE/REPLACE
BENCHMARK / 1
N: 738049.70
E: 2085414.75
EL.=j2kg
Ncoor ers-sm
L
Uo '�
�uZy
oW�OCx5Ko X4C7,77
K
w
iPi��aLL2
A�
kV LAh-E ]'RI VA
,
1
1 'r
SEABOCH TMOINY R
I ur rR ! -_•'/ \ / G-4-92 L
LIM
5EI. 20 ZONE2-'YMOND /rm.} rr
Is
PLACE921 RAVOR\ E= -
SF
1 •\`: `����.�: `�`.�tooftDi,vi
/r iENwD��oR'.bar
\\ WNE188
.8 REMCVEIREPLACE " 01, 705N/
\ _ _.�>s / AREA: 18.430 SF wAOE. JAMES
Cy R
©
0]8337856a `� `� \ • ���' '` f? / LA( t-il l L rC Y _ - -
SHEAR V EODORE H d , ` ` \ ` \ / • •1 (
SHEAR, G C E LUR50 r I _ -
928
RA- DR \ \, v \ \ / / - .LAK / -
W,,
PERRYMABW.N. PEroa
SLOAVEN'W'AN ERIN \ \\,' 't\\fir ^/ V ) I $ � GRADING AREh
�\ 1000 ROD VR //
0305E
oo�iRq�v�EriNwnoo oR /��/ � d�\'t {1 ll `;�i'���" -✓ � - � m,�% �`,0
iTIII I�'l ""rzlto
PRµ'ELL ORIVB
�--E —
,IDEA COUEJNE 5I ,
•�toob Pacu DR ! t ,n, r.
�- 1 m2 PO»FLL OR
I
ASNCR1.2 vo»Eu DR MS
GRADING AREA
9'0 SF
GRADING AREA:
'.
1,830 SF'-
E -a` � ✓rte//
W
W O
Lu
Y O
t,' `- V1k�'1 L OAK �; _
PERMAN
>°' NT M .: %'�:�
/j P 'cam\ � _ \, •R ` /^ 1 N, AREA:..E.9IFPACT y < \ /,Ti✓„`AC��!'��•
A A,A70300 :: 46a\\. �� k a .'►•. `arR% - ,I rlrr9' i'�i '_m,'6 ==3%" �/ /
ucKA1HrLrDN ` `�'�.• ;\ `L Z�'- '.`'' / DATE: APR 2018
VENWCOD DR ` 1 ' ' /
`\ W..�r s \ \ ``'�.. `�:' e'er S". -„ i..
\VDRAWN BY.- DRJ
AREA: 2,940 SF CHECKED BY.• PLC
T /
\ 9UC , W 24 < •-".} M� �` 1., AREA:2130 GF - _ / ,_', �'>4,�J ��-. �'.' :?:� '';' %i%%/ �°� \� \\ sd� \\ea
sRon
/ REVISIONS
N EDA
1012 RAVfNWD
DR IMPACTB�E \ T
\`, \ AIPACTAREA y \, \\ \ / NO. DA TE
\\ PERMANENT
I SE, 0783171166lor" / ���. \ IM
r*tEN
\•C/ U .. H jyf
Ymlrtre Rn�irA�r2anoRDN
SCALE
Y D)63972D59 / - \ , - / 1 v. (l��P / \r-
s0E . WA nDN D JR t. - 01 y6d \\ 1 "=60'
020 RANENWOOD DR '� $ � -- \ ��i \, �
/ D76x]ww '----`IIr.:,,.a / \ -i , PROJECT
roziae v DRA oR /, •�� _ ` %.::',•;�" _� 50079798
1021 RA1£NwYKYJ DR
FOR REVIEW ONLY T � `

3� N
NOTE: 100 YEAR WSE - 406.80 (h 88) n LU
= U
c U 5
018 M9279
Roil nir,'w o w N 60 0 30 60 120 Q
0 i
KnowweafsbelOW
1 INCH - 60 FEET Call beforeYOU d1a. I v o i
z o_
^ I L z
0 bz
WETLAND FROM PRELIMINARY JURIS. OMSI2017 -1V w
�NOEXIER. MMJIXtY ANN a oWwAY . T..ce.n
r DR RA9MVENWUDO '�\ \ { s TEMPORARY IMPACT
9
\ ¢}yI PERMANENT IMPACT
D]BSJB9131 - --�W,wav \ ` NY \� \ �- "I Q fy
i "'I MA MARIA h � `�'
RUAL) _ _ �- _ _ _ __--_- ---
L�
901 PAVENWOOD DR r \ \ w I O
I I \ M1fL1.Bo>IPueu Ho __---QSWN BENCHM_. ARK j_2__
\f
`w �'N•� O
I _ TN 73
.` E: 20650 41851
_4 6U NAIL IN GUTTER BENCHMARK / 1 -
`
0>833BBCO2 t4N� w1eW,r �� BSae�01a y --- N: 738049.70
CAND(ER, MARY GRAY •(+ BL AM . % I I /-- - ---- - _ _
90d RAV41W000 DR 'yL+�i 3,Ev ) MFIBWRNE RD ' 0)1534152010 I I I-1„I---� D]B.i4n9w \r E. 2065414.75
n,'0.' BLOCK, WIWAM J 0]83474928 OJBNJ092e 7 WPLIEAS. IJNbA B BREMER JgIN C k I 0)1534]8909 EL-.T24Yr
\ \ \ / 4`1 MEiBWRNE RID DAVEY. CHARLEB a 4! DA"
ELIZABETH A I I 5211 NELBOJRNE RD ' NCDOT BY5-501 Qp
I t0r la w OAVEY E02ABETH A N K Lm e - IT a 1217 MELBWRNE RD N9 01 MELBO RNERRC 6 $ A
5219 MELBOURNE RD 5219 MELBWRNE RD S7 Y 0]934)5999 I I I I I bill
N7 CR�IIER, KATHLEEN MAD9NRE t '- �^ I U m r
W
Z,
21215 MfLBW1RNRNERO
q �w�'zaal
O)1533>090 W HIM
16 u 2
KEEN, 4A=—­`DR
912 4AYENW00D DR W I X9rt /e
e34)
POWLL GA
DAVIS i
9 VENw000
IR
``� \` TEMPOPA ° m834T)e51 \ °' 0
oz1AC EscaT, ,a,vl a cALE
a
HAWSBURY W _
\\ '2a AC
m"'
offsom33 conn. c ..,,T�.. \ p, S 0]834]9
I 920 RAVEN- DR PS'. WAM 0]a>
hJnANE T
910 POWLL DR / 1
E� _ HAWRSBURY LANEiPRITATL',
fJa
0]833]88]) , X m --
S.RxX TUMMY R 6 , "' 1 ' �"` �A// /� = I \5 �C` ARN MG, KM N ` HORSTB KARL RAYMOND
SFABOOH, MICHELLE : l;, �� -(\, Ir Tb. 5207 HAWKSBURY LN _ _._ _ _ ___ _ //��
924 RAVENWOOO DR ur to 1 1 ` J . \ \ _ / + + Sb L :i`+ / \ ^ rlwlr -- _ _ --
fE
\ `\ ,t I \ \\�\ _ h
PERMANENT IMPACT
\ X
J i \ /d F)itrFLL llRlvC z .~.
ream,. � W vUbi
'r\. `\ AREA OOS AC ` 8 // :1 I - 075b7•u25 --- mvri'�w"wvwr+rY O v
` ` I i o .iENNeLLEkWLnER PAUL R n Q � Q
III LDER, JACOUEL Q�
j(r+SWELL DR J ^'pOB
' \
1,112NAs}ry' Bc'No''RE
'WoIRE 11 IL 6AK%'`"_-___
cwsl C`
WSH[ ,FRAN— 0
935 RAENWCON
LAKE
09
B
x39400
-� 0JB337� z / '. \ \\ `;` ` __ -_lJ - ' x394.M, -^' x339.G.,
PERRYMM, YON A ` \ ",//+:+•� b0. r i '-W[[Amrt
Y4W­ DR Efiu /
x39aa0J x39a:0u f wr rb // w
/ tEeERr�TrnMCESENW90M .150 _.33400' 331�J9 •DO' '34150' _ '50
�
\
X. RAV0 DR>,� �kaTEIOAk
/ s
394' �L,A F
oJa 7G3BoIPA
FF oN \ y J g \,� . A g]3 W� ✓ e?,''3 �� DATE: APR 2018
'AGM'A1*1 LYI:N M, \ oF FF/i
009 VbVW000 OR
\ / `\\� DRAWN BY.• DRJ
\\ � "�: ` `,. --__•{�,,�. \ CHECKED BY: PLC
"A" ODI RA AWQOD DR A/ e]S*I7 'Qi � yi �Bi/
IMPACT REVISIONS
MAIPACTARFJI: /
01 111213
KARENEZ 111 \•' �\ + /�Ii C✓ M7 fir / /�''
\ �t012 RAVEN1tOM DRQ /' ( `�; J`, ``\ `V+` `` Y \`\ \ \ - _ �/n ,"- __- I 1 //li JI ����,•%,".' `n` / N0. DATE
GMAC
IMPACTAREA
OA1AC
E ;
AREA \\ F.
\ / WvnTEHasE, ZMN H a
ouRA SUE.WNE2JR
I
ole RAVENW000 DR ,y �WPACf AREA:_ - -;� _ •'7%�'� \
SCALE
OJ834]2059 8Q E
SNEADRAVFWA`tON G Ji a ` 42 �'- ^ %
oxo Nw000 DR _ ',; • \/ \ \ - _ _ PROJECT
50079798
000 DR
PoopA sANORA
/ �' 024 RENWp00 M DR EX. 2

KEY PLAN
INV.`,NV=397.17cr
/ �� rt_I
=397.12
SE=
EASEMENT—i� III I LO z
NOTE
---- ----- 98 --_=\�� _ gzoNez --- �' 832
\� `—RIM=40_�� '\ ''��►� – – _�� .06 –N—
_ iNV. IN=396.41
NV. OUT=396.36 –
_ F,
------------
=-A 1
---- - - -- -
`�., ' � -- -SEE EAS
_
- ~ NOTE
�, r
�. to
X 394.00 x391.00 ------------ T � �j .-'
PERMANENT
I�\ 1 ,` I P`\ \ SEE'�EASD
– x 394.00 �\ I p' NOTE #
I r' x 394.00 `
�j 9Q
V HTE OAK41
-LAKE
- x 384.00 ----
WATER � y' -- r �' r , ` ;%i " / 3 f7 Qom'' 01( ;TEMPORARY mmor:__ k=
54 LF
39R 0) W 39 I\1;'���', i1 1\;j
-``•�. '�� - - _
3 - Ll X32----------------
- - -----------
x 38400
4.
07833763�-
W4TE OAK LAKE INC
1007 RAVEN-QgD,,_DR ;r pis
------------
Rb
00 -� 'A4
- -
��, -- --- - ---- '� - �`\.- - \\- - ' 395-
--
-_
- - -
8
--------- 0 -
�
- 397
-- ---'
---------------
NOTES:
STREAM IMPACT - PERMANENT 1. NO MORE THAN 5% OF THE MATERIAL FURNISHED SHALL
BE LESS THAN THE MINIMUM SIZE SPECIFIED AND NO
STREAM IMPACT - TEMPORARY MORE THAN 10% OF THE MATERIAL SHALL EXCEED THE
MAXIMUM SIZE SPECIFIED MATERIAL SHALL MEET ALL Xnowwhat'sbCiow.
OTHER REQUIREMENTS OF RIP RAP PER THE TECHNICAL C311 botore you dig.
SPECIFICATIONS
2. SEE DETAIL SHEETS 08 - DT FOR RISER AND OUTFALL 20 0 10 20
DETAILED DESIGN.
NOTE: 100 YEAR WSE = 404.80 (NAND 88)
1 INCH = 20 FEET FOR REVIEW ONLY

e
_ I NorE: goo vEAR wsE = 4a4.eo (NAw eek nW
3E U
i - DECREASED EX. OPEN WATER SURFACE AREA: 2.70 AC
W - U S
me339sz,e D'
KOENLER MAR— ANN I J W
821 RAVEV—DR 't ....••...•.. EX OPEN WATER EDGE 60 0 30 60 120 01 Q (n
i
PROPOSED OPEN WATER EDGE Knowvmat's MOW. U
1 INCH - 60 FEET Call before you dig. U o W
2
- —A.I } W
U 0
M
389250 \ w•m Si -�- W
- IK 900RAV.M.-Y DR N . ` vrtw ar-.a.ee
,mr
I GAPGA18ANA MARIA tr -�L � \ \_ � • � \ "---- I '
'4fFPHERD. NPRRY 9MOV ill •✓ ama \ ^'^'^'^ — - - —.
90! PAVENMD00 0R �uz•n \ 1 \ - � — _ _ �� _ _ '--- _ _ I _ _ _.- _ _ �_ _ _ _- _ _ __._- _ _ __ JI I O U
(
i16L.801U
'Rt\L RQAD ��H.�n-------- ��—
BENCHMARK j-2- _ -- - - ---- t
! a �' { - _ _ • 4x N: 736106.85
I
_ K..
_
NM
• '°° � 20550 41-5
1
rUTTtR BENCHMARK 1 - --_
60d NAILIN G__- _ 7 04
0]8)]89002 �. ` 6�831R20t1 , I "a f.Y
GANDER. MARY GRAY �: "� r B i ucLe uo AI°°+- RD 079-2014 - --tt- - I >B3.nsoe o)e3an9e] —_ _ ._ _ _ __ _ _
JB 70
Dae RAVEA-DD OR c 07 E'::2..51111:7 5
�' BLOCK. DUJR. J 0]&3174929 018)1]4928 II 6 wPLIEAs. unDA e I RREMfR. Jp1N C t BBOa / EL. = 4�}g,§-
S227 NEL WRNE RD OAtrcY. CH IR EB B h 61ARLE5 P k 1 Way I `w a 5211 N HBe URNE RD ' BREN£R, MIRY K NOYIELL, HAZEL PERRITT I NCDOT BYS-501
DAVEY, EJZABETH A CAVEY. EUZABEIH A I 520) MELBOURNE RD 5201 NELaOURNE RD
wn I 5219 MEl60JRNE RD 5219 MF BWRNF RD 4 I' p)&H759g9 I I
CR��((JJ11ER KATHLEEN
NE kl.. I -
! \ R\ \ � \ �, J ,m • y2AN
R15 MELS EE RD I Gti u•i W U � !
07-2903 ARPE/r�ym V e
u�
KI'N,
RAVENNaOD
I w
'' - - _ _ w i • / / _ Jf...s ' \. I —' _ _ -- _ _ __.1 I 1 I I / GNRIs7os34aGA DAVIS
I 00)91379994 1 y77 ,A« ' t \ ` w e• :\`.� 1\ `\ Boe P�OVEu DR I � o
i SHAR. L WERI A ` ✓�yp�-��` ��"' m
NX
\ ,. RAVEV— OR
D793c-795,
\ EBERT. )GAN h GA I
\` ` \ HA1KK5B'JRY' \
I 9zolrs scnv°RroAoo oR urn ��, 1f; 1i' ,t,` �., �` ,' `-\Ifs.' \ .Qe\ -- m9x I--
nsN, tnwpM o aLDR
` \ t' ; '`` \\4A \``` w SID WELL DR \
`\`W/
E
_ I �\ ,�-� % \ a° •' ,$HAWRSELRY
L.aNETRI VgA7E:
D-4-23 LLJ O
0)933)897) —_ _ _ �1' \ --' EX. OPEN WATER/ , -= �. `i�`' 0)9347)952 XGPSi. PnUL R k
S iINOiXYNtr �.. ,� (''--- �' i AREA510 AC \ ��� IS ��` S0)HAwwuRM `XORST KARL RAYMOND •m,i `�
' MICNEUE ' , , '� PK NC, R LN sT. PAA DR ®
j 924 RAVENA000 DR I ' '\� A.EM• , a \, \K 3P't'OpT
\ C\ \ \ Q�
PUHFLL llRI VG X
� .� � v �\. �• .A ' � �>�. v 8 �� ,1� I o7 sas 2516
,
�, meas]
,0���.'' \ - iov ✓aNEAiE MLfIER ^ AUL R tr
i•
/ tP i I' OMELL DH .SER. J O'JEL rvE S
\ \:. \�` `�.)' / I Doe PoxEaF-
8
i u. ,. `\�::: \`:\�` a: - ••..... '.; ` - '�� / Docs 7os4eANcr /''! o2°POKt•,4 >R ��/ U
maave599 \ i000
! sHu RANCNRE H a .\``: `�` ``` ,\\\ rT.. •♦• cp I i I .
sn9AR, E VE— DURSD \ ` \\ \ • al Zy eVR ,X420M1, / \ _ 8 .m _ _ - - `m w z
925
RAlENYA)c0 DR
x3944%
♦ _ m kI
PERRYMA,'YOTE ` `V `ii , : ♦ V` %394.UO�PRaP OPEN ' �♦w. 40�
MOAN ERIN K I .ACL/� > WATER AREA.
1000 RA- DR / \ \ \ \ :\ `\ `\ \�,.. • I ." \ r� // 249 AO ,\ - ♦ ,,'�' LLJ
`� `\\,'\ ♦rrrl �I (� �\\''- //' x39400 X394 2:•. oY=zr'm�
\ a,> / \` V _ ♦ 39400 l� / ,, \�-"/ \•` - - LL
wr
/ EBENi�'fii'AH�B¢5\ foo. PAVENxvoD DR / /j /� ` a�\ \ ••• ♦ 0 3�3«-50\",i-50' " �
s\\i l -,♦� /'
f! TE OAK
^ ^ : e •�•♦ `, 3saaD\ x3aLEAN
/ /� o>e317oJaD / 1�:..y� BL �F F'g,/,.`a. L�,'•''",�i:''�, APR 2018
LAGANA KATHY LYNN , _ lye q, ;:,Y���" //-�' /
Doe RA _DU
/ • m �\ • FR eq, r , `� �.»2` _0 - •' ;a' /
\ N ? ♦ /. i.' �� DRAWN BY.• DRJ
�A., .. \ --i '�E0783413763 x394.00 ;:\
RnAw`t oD ng CHECKED BY: PLC
REVISIONS
me34)EN43 / \ ; \ b \ ♦ ! Isy('
9DCRANA ELZABEM N 7g, .,i: '• C rc
\ "'I RAVENW000 DP \ \•`, ,\ ` \.. +r '.- ,.-. 4. %i%��,: NO. DA IL
AA
\`/ MH TEHausE, eRorm
V/eI TEXOLSE, SJZANNE Z Jq \ r + -5+ _ • • / \\ \ \\ /
,Ota RAVENW00D OPr44
e°�T^� SCALE
21
\ \ y AmB3l)ill59 / ,ar x ° _ -_
of D. WAItON 0 A J
zo RAOEre•Anoo DR -'" -'-_ _ _\� ' \ '__ PROJECT
a 4 SANDRA N 50079798
,024 LE. MANNVODNDRA
-----
/',024 RAlflJW000 DR EX. a I
\ / /�� / POR REVIEW ONLY A Ar

m
SECTION E - EXISTING CONDITIONS PLAN, OVERALL SITE PLAN
& VICINITY MAP

\
I
_
01k
YARllm
KOEMEIL JORY ANN ,
,
1
I
624 MMiNMNXKI ON ,
1
1
us.
KOElLLA10.YM.q Y ANN /
1 900 MMDI'WOD DR
07.0ln
aMOA, AHA 3eeMARIA
XARRY SwON
E04 RAMDiwXO DR
w T 9
� \
1
/
/
1
I
un 4 / rc
/'
I/
, cANa. YAm.mAr
, EOe MViNROOD OR
/
I
,
uN ie 1
1
•
I ( 1 rNl
I�T2DOR
1
___�I �' / j' •L
RPF, ROMPORT
IaBw'RA�\eNR moR
i
1
I —'—M OR
1
1 1 1
1
1
I
oless7aen
I
I \
SEABOd, 11YO1NY R k
I
924 RAl. WWDOD O F
i 924 flA\FNw%ID OR
,
1
1
I
\
\
♦`\
1 u. re
1 07033)8606
\
I
1
D103S71422
PEw2YYAN, PEYOTE k
' `
ETM1 K
SLOAN, \
,000 DAR.RAVENYADOD W
♦♦\
/ Dim. FA71nA5 M
1004 MYEIIN\MD DR
1 0
1 NOTE: 100 YEAR WSE =404.70' NAW) 86
60 0 JO 60 120
Knew what*. bCI01N.
Ikl \ I I Call betm lou dig.
1 INCH 60 FEET
I 1
\ I
.er �• a
�-�—
T
E 2085041851
kl 60d NAIL IN CUTTER BENCHMARK / 1
\&21
BLOCK, Y�1U�.11Y J I 1 N: ]38049 70
q'EZY7 MELa0U8NE RD O)eNe20,4__—__
1 a7e3tTri0S IIT E: 208541¢3&6
0763414.2. 1 1 1 1 wAl1ER3, NIDA a I—__ -
0.00L wWAY J 1 O)eJ47N2e I I ❑ BIIEIIFR, JOXN C k OM47S O
/ 322] NE19011XNE RO , GAMEY, CXAwEe 9 ! I OAY£Y. GIARIEe B k I I uR 4 1 I 1 .211 1ELBOIIRNE RO ; NEG.
N 1 NORELL fl II PEw6TT NCOOT BYS-501
I`::�t \\ / uw4 552119YMEIBW—w1ENR. I s9i0 YEIB�O 'RD 1 O7aN73YRY I �.I I 520] MELBOURNE RD 1 0201 YFiH01eeE Im
q, \ a------------�
�.
_ J � 1 ♦\ o7e347eero � I
na- -- •I\ ,' \ ------ j ' ♦ / CNRLiOA
6 P .:u KS 1 1
\--•.li - - .._ ` �\�• � �\— ' f� I 5706 NAw(SBURY ❑1 I I
L.✓ 1.•r (v \ i 1. I 1 ol—him 1 I
i
t ♦ t
I
I �� �-�- \ `♦ � . \ � ` - -" �" � � Fl91, wlllAM D lJ4wE T
I
i
1 i
�. � l �� `'. �6.� B10 PDY❑1 OR
J I i
•
CONCURRENT REVIEW APPROVAL
CIN OF RAL£ICH PLANS AUTHORIZED FOR CONSTRUCTION
Plans for the proposed use have been reviewed for general
compliance with applicable code, This limited -Wew, and
authorization for construction /s not to be considered to
represent total compliance with all legal requirements for
dewlopment and construction. The property owner, design
consultants, and contractors one each responsible for
compliance with all applicable City, State and Federal lows. This
specific authorization below is not a permit, nor shall it be
construed to permit any Halation of City, State or Federal Low.
All Construction must be in accordance with all Local, State,
and Federal Rules and Regulation..
TRANSPORTATION FIELD SERWCES
r.+ /
O7e3lT16B2 \ 110161, PAUL R k
7041x4 KIM M \ HORST. KAIS RAYMOND uR n o ♦ `— _ _ _ - _ —
1 5207 H r,KIRY W 14 AI RAYMOND
-------------------------------- -
S \
0103473703 07e]Sn023
---
\ e`,L., YARR OAK LANE IRC I t I —,. ♦ I \ \
HD D. J MARK ! wL00EAP,WL'E10R
\ 1 ,001 RAWWR000 DR `\ \ , 4 AR JENNEUE Nr MLpER, JADOU RE S� ----
.1004 PORE11 OR ; 1000 P0111121 DR
A kNANCY R I I A9,a1NL OD1gMT C GL61 \,j
o0o PORFLL
ERGEM3s•
``\ �\ �\ �-- � "F ♦SPRIWAY _ l
\/1'71 O,t`L
`♦\. �l 1 1 /^ / ✓YX-}i4 1 (� llll ^i FAILED PMMARy
i
SPRLWAY
CONCRETE
LYNN
/.
WINGWALLS
LAGANA, I—Y ♦ \-\ `\ `I� \� y / /
1006 MVEYROOO DR
/'/ ♦`\ \ \ �.\ ` \ I >.,�''�'��4ykiN'lr 11 � ✓' � ',� ' \ //,
_ 07..773743 / '� �, IJI 4f✓ ' / \\ \ �'•
/'///' `\ ♦♦ `\\ \\ •,\ `� = NMIEOAN100 RK i,l /{�
ww RA\£N:'p00 OR /
10122 MVFNM11 0W171R EMA\BFM ♦♦\ i J ( `� s)wi/ `/y \\ ,�� \ /'•
\ ODD ON
me RA—ROCID OR
SI•AVIAN D `*\ i. �.` �., %'�/ / \\ •��`Qf SS�dL��.
,020 M\4NNOOD DR /% uw a � t>� - _ ` /'' / = _ � � =°.b � • � ry.?y
7k773000 SEAL
0 e
tO2 RMAWt1RODD OR ` •:%/•/j /, / =9. 042236 2
�/ / lora``\ / ; .i.;"' 'i �.,,..�•r...os __ %9 sc'YOIN
q\
i o1e3413W0
\♦`�// / W R
m4 s
ANDM
,MvellR000 DR ;tor y �; /. LLrllllllll\\\O�
/
REVIEW ONLY

Q ,
! KOFHLER, �Y AMl � � I
, ez1 RAYEMwVOD oa 1
I '
I /
1
1
O,e]]99250 d„oy
!KOEXI.ER, YPRJORY
i 900 RAV[TIYg00 DR ; `\ \
1 a \ Ar
OAROA ANA Y
BARRIIe
Y BAIRN ulw p'm n lure: \ res.
901 RA'�ENwa00 M
f I `4• \ •$�\yYw
1 I `
1 l uN v I / `O�w_ a•
1 GYtlUIi YM,Y dUWVtY dUY
1 60e RA\FJIA000 OR / iwl
1 076ll)BW]
1 !612 NF12 CYNIHU SMAIwE , c[ t ` , RAN:7rwOM OR i � `` \
I 0761]iee64
9N.IK. RO9fRT A
6,e M♦4N10C OR
kk
LASS ]CORASG
..>Aeopauni unit R e 1si? I 'r
f SEA90R1, 41wE1JS E
I 92, RAVENW000
! SHEAR. 1REODaiE N e ♦
' SNYAR, ANCINE IX1R50 ♦\; \`\ \
6ze an\o19ooD DR \
�Y \\.
_ _ �' . ERRYMAN PE rmE A ♦`\
St1MN ERIN K //� `\
07e]3I6]66 /
RAYFIINOM OR j„ %�/ ♦�
IAGAilN& K DJeO
A. KA1NY LYNN
aoe RAwrwooD oR /J
07 IM
91lCHANAN, KAREN FJIZABEIN
,012 RAVEXNa00 DR
ATTENTION CONTRACTORS
The Consaucoon Contrado, responsible for the extension of water, sewer arigbr reuse, as
approved in these pans, is responsible for mnfecsiro the ENGWEER/NO SER WCES at (919)
996-2408, and the PUBLIC UT7 MESDEPARMENT al (919) 9964540 at least twenly
hours Prior to beginning anyof theircorrsbuction-
FAILURE 11 wily both CiyDePerSneols in advance of beginning Const—lion, Will result in the
issuarxro of nioneieryfins, and require reinstallation of any water ar sewer fac9idas not
inspected as a result of fhis notification failure.
FAILURE to nil for /nsp b'm, Tnsfar/a Downsheam P&V, heva PermiMed P/en on ,Mb sde, or
any other ✓ halon of CiyafRaAvgh Standards will result in a Fine and Possible Exclusion ham
future work in o5e CffyofRaft1h.
I ' f
I I I
-MELBOURNE ROAD
ROAD —_--_--_- -- .a, --------------� �_
(so' AUaLIC R/w,
w,a,w•
a ��� �� BENCHMARK 8 2 -----
-___ E 738108.85
a E: 2085041.51
60d NAIL IN GUTTER
UIe9a14 J
NIWAN J J viala1014 1 s '�;'(--- 0,9]1„909 �77M
F1agMNE RD I O)B]a)4p1e ■ 6 1 1 1 HALTERS. —, '
aLWr. W J 1 0,0]4,462e SY 1 , 5211 i0lBo IP..• 1 9RENEA. O/9%)YY09
/ 521) YE1BaJRrIE RO i OAYEY, wARlES 9 4 1 DM.EY. !&. B A e
DAVEY Fll2A8ETH A 1 DAVEY, ELIZABETH A ail I : 8���
/ I %,:g Nf1B0UpNE 5216 YELBp1RNE RO 078]1)5660 _
is
b11s YElea.IRKEIRD i• i I--I�,,. I i 1
M\8 1 a 1
as rovsE,. aR I c„ � I
3
:GALE ' Public
IlAwCSBLRY LN I
\ \�-
NOTE: 100 YEAR WSE =404.80 (NAND Be)
60 0 30 60 120
1 INCH - 60 FEE!
Sewer Collection / Extension System
1 f ' 1 Tha City of Rdelgh e.e.la fo Ne . .-- and extoo b of 1M
I I ra we 1 rw ,P CR'. public .seer .y.tem w shown . 114 pion Tha molwW .d
I L Coo.wcuon mathode ... for thw ..lett .hall ..form to the
L---1 I ' ataKlanw and ep•clecallon. of th. Milo PuWlc U811lloe H.deoal,.
1
1 1 0)e]479)0] 1 1 My of Rologh
R". Utatiw bapodnwl PwnNl
1 nSH, wALAY D fMYE T I
910 POiMU A uhodoodo,, to Conef:ad
�F Dale
HAWKSBURY LANE (PRIY�ATE)
JB T \
RIM: 405.5��
`� INV IN (N): 402.72 4»�z \ PPALMrt e
N4V0 T 1 9
\
BENCMMi M If 1
N: 738049.70
E: 2085414.75
EL. - 4,76,6
NCDOT BY5-501
•
Cc
Know what'i beIOW.
Callbakm youdig.
Q
it z
POOL[, SANS A Y
-N-
1
ap
9AMDRA
it
1
\ ,Om IUKerw11D DR / _ f♦
BB
99 '
, 4i(/Hl.l'E OAIC
NOTE: 100 YEAR WSE =404.80 (NAND Be)
60 0 30 60 120
1 INCH - 60 FEE!
Sewer Collection / Extension System
1 f ' 1 Tha City of Rdelgh e.e.la fo Ne . .-- and extoo b of 1M
I I ra we 1 rw ,P CR'. public .seer .y.tem w shown . 114 pion Tha molwW .d
I L Coo.wcuon mathode ... for thw ..lett .hall ..form to the
L---1 I ' ataKlanw and ep•clecallon. of th. Milo PuWlc U811lloe H.deoal,.
1
1 1 0)e]479)0] 1 1 My of Rologh
R". Utatiw bapodnwl PwnNl
1 nSH, wALAY D fMYE T I
910 POiMU A uhodoodo,, to Conef:ad
�F Dale
HAWKSBURY LANE (PRIY�ATE)
JB T \
RIM: 405.5��
`� INV IN (N): 402.72 4»�z \ PPALMrt e
N4V0 T 1 9
\
BENCMMi M If 1
N: 738049.70
E: 2085414.75
EL. - 4,76,6
NCDOT BY5-501
•
Cc
Know what'i beIOW.
Callbakm youdig.
Q
it z
POOL[, SANS A Y
-N-
1
I
CONCURRENT REVIEW APPROVAL
CITY OF RALEIGH - PLANS AUTHORIZED FOR CONSTRUCTION
Plane for the proposed use haw been reviewed for general
compliance with applicable codes. This limited review, and
authorization for construction is not to be considered to
represent total compliance with all legal requirements for
development and constructloo. The property owner, design
consultants, and contractors are each responsible for
compliance with oil applicable City, State and Federal laws. This
specific autholzatlon below is not a permit, nor shall it be
construed to penult any Wolatlon of City, State or Federal Law.
All Const—tion must be in acco d.— with all Local. Stote,
and Federal Rules and Regulations.
TRANSPORTATION FIELD SERVICES
PUBLIC U77u77ES
STORMWATER
PLANNING/ZONING
FIRE
URBAN FORESTRY
Lil
W 0
OU (S). 4 .6 NQ Nil Y ,fdKT. ItN3 RA)YOND ur f. ID __ - --- LL_
� ..at591W7 W 611 POeELL aR _—__--
\ \ ow `\ \ POWELL DRIVE Q
\\A\`a `A.`� .
``fOp 399.011
/i ♦l I� \II�:\ �` �`� /O' J f-_�� `.3100 X394.00 x384.00
♦ 1 1
\+
3' i -' 33+50 �`� 311W 34+50
WHITE OAKmim
�
A.
♦. d C: �`. .. \ ON `VT:.��..``:. - \`-`:� r 1 msvine.. x39400 o S9
0,8]47188 n
w7ENDug. esa.N N e
re7at0U5E, SDIANNE 2 R
,018 RAwIlwaOD DR
0)831)2]56
v+EAoa wxnoN o r.
OQ OF 15. A
A TDSrsae,ro i�
•,� tm�£ wr0d�"riE pn` °us 1 O
w
;z C�
N\ / it J uemelt w
1 � '
y ' 1
(LJ/
) .•:.:; 3s.00 3 � � I�.Im..^ � . Wim_ ;
FAI
/j
DATE: APR 2018
50079798
DRAWN BY. JEW
POOL[, SANS A Y
r �.
J o7e3i)]Deo
9AMDRA
it
OQ OF 15. A
A TDSrsae,ro i�
•,� tm�£ wr0d�"riE pn` °us 1 O
w
;z C�
N\ / it J uemelt w
1 � '
y ' 1
(LJ/
) .•:.:; 3s.00 3 � � I�.Im..^ � . Wim_ ;
FAI
/j
DATE: APR 2018
50079798
DRAWN BY. JEW
/
CHECKED BY.' PLC
REVISIONS
NO. DATE
1 R OF .T7
/
_REVIEW ONLY
.war N1CAR(f'N�/i
/
117S
SEAL ". 1PROJECT
-9. 042236 Z-
-'�?g'�Nc1
SCALE
50079798
,Ra.pC-
A JA
1 R OF .T7

KEY PLAN
x 394.00
X 384.00
ATTENTION CONTRACTORS
The C—miction CmIracAx responsible for the extension
of water, sewer and/or reuse, as approved in Mase plans,
is responsible for cantac ' the ENGNEERING
SERVICES at (919) 996 -2409, and the PUBLIC U77LMES
DEPAR7MENr at (9191990-4540 at least twenty four
lours prior to beginning any of their constniceon.
FAILURE to nolify boot CAy DepaOnerNs in advance of
beginning Consbuoffon, will result in the issuance of
nonetery fiires, and require reinstallation of any water o
$awl facilities not inspected as a result of this nol15Cation
failure.
FAILURE to cell for 1-peclron, J-10. Downsl—Pay,
have Pam�led,%- on Job site, Or any other Viotehbn of
Cityoffi~ Standads will result N a Fine and Possible
Exdusion from future work in the Ciryof?aleigh.
X 39480
X 394.00
x 394.00
NOTE: 100 YEAR WSE = 404.80 (NAVD 88)
ib � JdI
\ ` O
J
Slit
SUFFER
1 EMERGENCY SPILLWAY, TOP
\ ELEV. 403.3'. SEE NOTE 2 THIS
PROJECT SURVEYOR TO I I I I p j ' j.,.P
PLACE 3!8" REBAR AT FILTER 2.5:1 I I( F1
DIAPHRAGM EXTENTS
P ECOMPACTED
X 394.003' WIDE FILTER P I ' TO ELEVATION
SHOWN
DIAPHRAGM, I 0
NCDOT 25 SAND � 2.5:1
BENTONITE ENRICHED SOIL,
SEE PROFILE AND NOTES
PRIMARY RISER, SHEET DH I I
SEE DETAILS {�
SHEETS 3334 _ 1
INS
NOTES:
1. NO MORE THAN 5% OF THE MATERIAL FURNISHED SHALL Sewer Collection /Extension System
BE LESS THAN THE MINIMUM SIZE SPECIFIED AND NO M. city of Rdeieh rn mt. to the comeclkn and eoim.kn of tM
MORE THAN 10% OF THE MATERIAL SHALL EXCEED THE b1ty. pun4c .....y.tem ee .nom m thi. Pkn. 1H. mot.lm and
MAXIMUM SIZE SPECIFIED. MATERIAL SHALL MEET ALL cmewetlom m.tnode ueae f.r thb Protect e,d emlwm to th.
OTHER REQUIREMENTS OF RIP RAP PER THE TECHNICAL mmmrm and I dfi.tim. of the City. Puhlk UfAlttee Hmdtroak
SPECIFICATIONS rlty of Rdalgh
2. SEE DETAIL SHEETS D6, D7 FOR RISER AND OUTFALL
P.blk M"" D—inii t P." 0 20 0 10 20 40
DETAILED DESIGN. wao,monn ro ce.etnlct
oma
1 INCH = 20 FEET
1, /
t" DIAMETER
)TE I THIS
N�
fin.\
I
„ LJ r�
W�HITE
OA
LAF'
TOP OF DAM SHALL BE—
SLOPED TO PROVIDE
.-F
DRAINAGE TOWARDS LAKE
X 394.00
x 394.00
NOTE: 100 YEAR WSE = 404.80 (NAVD 88)
ib � JdI
\ ` O
J
Slit
SUFFER
1 EMERGENCY SPILLWAY, TOP
\ ELEV. 403.3'. SEE NOTE 2 THIS
PROJECT SURVEYOR TO I I I I p j ' j.,.P
PLACE 3!8" REBAR AT FILTER 2.5:1 I I( F1
DIAPHRAGM EXTENTS
P ECOMPACTED
X 394.003' WIDE FILTER P I ' TO ELEVATION
SHOWN
DIAPHRAGM, I 0
NCDOT 25 SAND � 2.5:1
BENTONITE ENRICHED SOIL,
SEE PROFILE AND NOTES
PRIMARY RISER, SHEET DH I I
SEE DETAILS {�
SHEETS 3334 _ 1
INS
NOTES:
1. NO MORE THAN 5% OF THE MATERIAL FURNISHED SHALL Sewer Collection /Extension System
BE LESS THAN THE MINIMUM SIZE SPECIFIED AND NO M. city of Rdeieh rn mt. to the comeclkn and eoim.kn of tM
MORE THAN 10% OF THE MATERIAL SHALL EXCEED THE b1ty. pun4c .....y.tem ee .nom m thi. Pkn. 1H. mot.lm and
MAXIMUM SIZE SPECIFIED. MATERIAL SHALL MEET ALL cmewetlom m.tnode ueae f.r thb Protect e,d emlwm to th.
OTHER REQUIREMENTS OF RIP RAP PER THE TECHNICAL mmmrm and I dfi.tim. of the City. Puhlk UfAlttee Hmdtroak
SPECIFICATIONS rlty of Rdalgh
2. SEE DETAIL SHEETS D6, D7 FOR RISER AND OUTFALL
P.blk M"" D—inii t P." 0 20 0 10 20 40
DETAILED DESIGN. wao,monn ro ce.etnlct
oma
1 INCH = 20 FEET
1, /
t" DIAMETER
)TE I THIS
N�
fin.\
I

Qt 1
C�
� sa
I 07a3Ja9279 � ' I
1 K 82,1ER, MAR..Y?RT ANN 1
RA�ENYAO� CR ,
I ' 1
a N
0763398250
CARCIA, 11AMPR
E904RRAVc?fNOW D "-1 R wan w
( R
i
I CANOtER, MART MAY
ace RAVENw001) DR El
90) — --
0793379
0783379994
i ­SpaARE
916 RA9ENNOOD DR \
I 91 •1
A's
NOTES: S U
1, BYPASS PIPING TO BE PLACED WITHIN LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE WHEN NOT
ON PAVEMENT. 60 0 30 60 720 p;
147
U
2. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL SECURE PUMP ACCORDING TO THE PROVIDED Know what's b@IOW.
FLOW INFORMATION. 1 INCH = 60 FEET Call before you di C7
w z
3. PUMPING OPERATIONS MUST BE MONITORED 24 HOURS A DAY FOR EACH Pw
DAY OF THE PUMPING OPERATION. F PQ
W
z
4. A BACKUP PUMP MUST BE PROVIDED, AND MUST BE CONNECTED READY U �
TO PUMP AT ALL TIMES. BACKUP PUMP SHALL BE OPERATED VIA FLOAT.
5. NO FLOW THROUGH SEWER PLUGS ARE ALLOWED. USE A MECHANICAL ATTENTION CONTRACTORS W
L SEWER PLUG (SEE CORPUD HANDBOOK) ON DOWNSTREAM INVERT OF
•\ ... SUCTION MANHOLE. The Construction Contractor responsible for the extension of water, sewer and/or reuse, as approved in these
plans, IB responsible for contacting the ENGINEERING SERVICES at [phone] and the PUBLIC UTILITIES
DEPARTMENT at [phone] at least hveMvhwrhours prior to beginning an of thea construction,
v
\& RESTRAIN PIPING DURING BYPASS OPERATIONS. y Oct
\ \ 7. NOT ALL SANITARY SEWER SERVICE LINES ARE SHOWN ON THESE PLANS. FAILURE r notify both ire Departments in advance o beginning Construction, will result in the issuance of U
"\ CONTRACTOR TO BYPASS SEWER LATERALS AS NECESSARY TO MAINTAIN monetary fines, and require reinstallation of any water or sewer fadll[bs not inspected as a result of this notification
# SEWER SERVICE AND PREVENT SANITARY SEWER OVERFLOWS DURING failure.
CONSTRUCTION. •//� O�
-----. __. -_-- FAILURE to cell for Inspection, Install a Downstream Plug, have PemrNted Plans on ,bb sMe, or any other Violation
-" & ALL ACCESS THROUGH WETLANDS SHALL BE MATTED PER THE EROSION of City of Raleigh Standards will result in a Fine and Possible Exclusion from future work in the City of Raleigh.
Weer— ----_._.
�\ V7i180t"fA HOLD CONTROL AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PIAN.
Iaw
yaM =i8
.ou.E RD I ( I WRIiER��CNOA B I aRENER. JON 70 d 069 909 C
! 52aLOCK, WRNS J I '/rOJ OM 11 B A aF Ct,ARI£5 B I I w b 5211 MELBWNE RD '� -.. ' ,tl.JI
D YE". FI.ZPbEIH A DAVT'Y � ZA 1 I I ' -7
2 7E WRNE RC R520t�4ELBWRv R':l Z + (p o' W
\/ 5219 kELRO' R E D 5219 aELBWRM1E FD ly O>e3sZ599
LEEN fid: E hi tpr e W R N K a tai Z
�"p2m15 NER 9OURN ft0 I.,
Z
u,o
r ad
I ` 0783f7Ns
Rsros enA
cons
\ i\ X"
\'°A \\ \• \1 Sq\'I .ate 1 rA.cLl
\••� I i
j
4 I
! ` i tet, \l��v\ %i rrA.�o"ro' I 07a947a70?
j'A 7
/
v `VA ....e `—�-• _ l a��r:1 i_ 1 AL PRI V:1 TT
SEQUENCE OF CONSMW110N AND BY-PASS PUMPING PLAN
BypeM
AVG
PEAK
Pumping
Suction
Discheige
MAX.
DISTANCE
FLOW
FLOW
Phase
Action to be completed
MH
MH
LIFT (FT)
(FT)
(GPM)
IGPMI
z
Replace SMH111437 and sewer
SMH139M
SMH128773
11
150
1
between SMH111437 and
SMH128128
SMH728773
8
100
SMH128128
Replace SMH128128, SMH144172,
2
and sewer betweenSMH12812B and
SMH120257
SUH111437
9
300
SMH120257
SMH113483
SMf144172
7
250
3
Replace SMI-1120257
SMH154259
SMH144172
8
250
Hepface sewer bar—SMH120257
4
and SMH154259 and replace
SMH110016
SMH120257
6
350
SMH154259
l: -1 zea a I
Rz \CL
..N p o J i�
Au d
z
' Baa U w
=- a a7J .- —
M
-
5 �-..
0 U CL
\ A
\- - coc cwt Uu_
L AKE LLJ
\ /- (n
0,
!iA��v��alwlOtq // 0 L�
, I --'- I `
RLq-aA MNK •.\ a \ \: \\\\\ \ \ \\ \ \ \ • ) \ '\ J / \ -J� i - - - - \- '� n 1 ' • ,.,,,,s, - >� - 04 36 r - Z
vTNwmo OR / \ \ c"•` \\ \ \\ \ ,\W' ,�, '$ / /i' / \ \ �� ,'*R-, _ f SD,. .�
;_.f
079
t\ wa / roumttt
1 1 X-1 �.-179399� oaTE: APR 2018
\�. -,,,. DRAWN err: JEW
•\ ,%,/� 107R"AL"cNw7HovoOE OR" j� \.\ w.. -....r \\\\ `\\\ �\ / '�, j rC' .�'.-� /" /,. / CHECKED BY.• PLC
\�`" \�\�"/%„ �.%i / REVISIONS
NO. DATE
\ / \ \•\\�
07a14n 2AJ % L �,- rte• \ //. Z . "
a�ENANAv KAREN EuzneEY c.\,\•, " \\�\�\`� \\ \\\\�� - - '"�--,e// '�� \ CONCURRENT REVIEW APPROVAL
•C rOt2
Al
\,\\�\ \ •.\ \ :� /''" \ - dTr OF RALEIGH PLANS AUTHORIZED FOR CONSTRUCTION.
'•\ '.\ \', •� �\ \ \\\\ ..`` ,'•1\ ��;� �� ------ \-'" , {.' ' - \ Plane for lM ed Use haw been reviewed for I
i ' %\ 4Y` •• \ \ ` ` 1 ' \ \ "- \ -\ /' \ /, y� \ \�a, amvaanae withproposedapplicable aaaeW This limited �a. e
i \ \. 1 __ _ -�ay�� �•• :r: rs authonzoeon forconstruction Is not to be considered to
"\ / twm gip.:\.\, \ \ \�___— _ �"a �.- aP7\_=- _-� I/ /"" �/� G: ': •%"/ \\\ \ nprWaml total comp8arwe with dl legal requirements for
tlevMopmant Dna eonelruetbn. The % mesAn,as \ It, \ .1` ` %S -c=- -�- \�; /,"� ; `" i'. consultants, and
tr«ttion. T e prr �y o rw,, design
SCALE
1;`' \`' °.pane
iiENO05E. BRowN n compliance with oil apolcable City, Stole a Federol law,. This
SlI2A.NNE z ,m\
` ipi6 RAl5:Nw000 0R /".\ •1// `�-�,_ /_� _ _ _---` �� .���'� '.`• ^, . i'' _ % ,"y\
specific wtharizatbn below is not Permit, nor shall it be
•\ / ""-,. ,o- - _\�`� / TMs. ul ConeVutolperm7t any neti «oreunce WNoou iowidsmt�
Sewer Collection Extension System
\\/" / ,
ped Raqulallon
W.Public and Federal Ruin
TRANSPORTATION FIELD SERVICES
PROJECT _ 5007979
8m, My aRd.gh -no ,t, to w, -t and w,Ioof tn.
chi. NO..,eer sy twn as ,haw, an Thi, Pb,. The matend and 078347x099 �" m \ Air\ -- '--- -- _— .�•�\✓ M _ �J� � 0� / PUBLIC URDTES
ConNructim melhade uses for this pope! Nan —f—to us 5NEA0, wA— Dt `7s STIXtMWATER
standards and speci9e0eans of U, Otis PuNk Utiltin 1020 RAvV,4000 0R
CRY of Roldpl, \ / G79JA7J050 �: •'\ �� ��-'-__� "�btS ii sry a, -r ,w PLANNING/ZONING
0w`Rm
_RR 01r1u wd Pwnn /FOOT£, SANDRA
wU toOm�w RA� DR C21
,
URBAN FORESTRY
SANDRA FOR REVIEW ONLY - -
3
24 R4OF .37
10VENW000 CR a' ]/ / ; l•�"/�%'
A�
W
J
O
U
�
CIL
LLJ
D
4d
W U
z
l: -1 zea a I
Rz \CL
..N p o J i�
Au d
z
' Baa U w
=- a a7J .- —
M
-
5 �-..
0 U CL
\ A
\- - coc cwt Uu_
L AKE LLJ
\ /- (n
0,
!iA��v��alwlOtq // 0 L�
, I --'- I `
RLq-aA MNK •.\ a \ \: \\\\\ \ \ \\ \ \ \ • ) \ '\ J / \ -J� i - - - - \- '� n 1 ' • ,.,,,,s, - >� - 04 36 r - Z
vTNwmo OR / \ \ c"•` \\ \ \\ \ ,\W' ,�, '$ / /i' / \ \ �� ,'*R-, _ f SD,. .�
;_.f
079
t\ wa / roumttt
1 1 X-1 �.-179399� oaTE: APR 2018
\�. -,,,. DRAWN err: JEW
•\ ,%,/� 107R"AL"cNw7HovoOE OR" j� \.\ w.. -....r \\\\ `\\\ �\ / '�, j rC' .�'.-� /" /,. / CHECKED BY.• PLC
\�`" \�\�"/%„ �.%i / REVISIONS
NO. DATE
\ / \ \•\\�
07a14n 2AJ % L �,- rte• \ //. Z . "
a�ENANAv KAREN EuzneEY c.\,\•, " \\�\�\`� \\ \\\\�� - - '"�--,e// '�� \ CONCURRENT REVIEW APPROVAL
•C rOt2
Al
\,\\�\ \ •.\ \ :� /''" \ - dTr OF RALEIGH PLANS AUTHORIZED FOR CONSTRUCTION.
'•\ '.\ \', •� �\ \ \\\\ ..`` ,'•1\ ��;� �� ------ \-'" , {.' ' - \ Plane for lM ed Use haw been reviewed for I
i ' %\ 4Y` •• \ \ ` ` 1 ' \ \ "- \ -\ /' \ /, y� \ \�a, amvaanae withproposedapplicable aaaeW This limited �a. e
i \ \. 1 __ _ -�ay�� �•• :r: rs authonzoeon forconstruction Is not to be considered to
"\ / twm gip.:\.\, \ \ \�___— _ �"a �.- aP7\_=- _-� I/ /"" �/� G: ': •%"/ \\\ \ nprWaml total comp8arwe with dl legal requirements for
tlevMopmant Dna eonelruetbn. The % mesAn,as \ It, \ .1` ` %S -c=- -�- \�; /,"� ; `" i'. consultants, and
tr«ttion. T e prr �y o rw,, design
SCALE
1;`' \`' °.pane
iiENO05E. BRowN n compliance with oil apolcable City, Stole a Federol law,. This
SlI2A.NNE z ,m\
` ipi6 RAl5:Nw000 0R /".\ •1// `�-�,_ /_� _ _ _---` �� .���'� '.`• ^, . i'' _ % ,"y\
specific wtharizatbn below is not Permit, nor shall it be
•\ / ""-,. ,o- - _\�`� / TMs. ul ConeVutolperm7t any neti «oreunce WNoou iowidsmt�
Sewer Collection Extension System
\\/" / ,
ped Raqulallon
W.Public and Federal Ruin
TRANSPORTATION FIELD SERVICES
PROJECT _ 5007979
8m, My aRd.gh -no ,t, to w, -t and w,Ioof tn.
chi. NO..,eer sy twn as ,haw, an Thi, Pb,. The matend and 078347x099 �" m \ Air\ -- '--- -- _— .�•�\✓ M _ �J� � 0� / PUBLIC URDTES
ConNructim melhade uses for this pope! Nan —f—to us 5NEA0, wA— Dt `7s STIXtMWATER
standards and speci9e0eans of U, Otis PuNk Utiltin 1020 RAvV,4000 0R
CRY of Roldpl, \ / G79JA7J050 �: •'\ �� ��-'-__� "�btS ii sry a, -r ,w PLANNING/ZONING
0w`Rm
_RR 01r1u wd Pwnn /FOOT£, SANDRA
wU toOm�w RA� DR C21
,
URBAN FORESTRY
SANDRA FOR REVIEW ONLY - -
3
24 R4OF .37
10VENW000 CR a' ]/ / ; l•�"/�%'

,b159r _ art\ / X r / —
ygn �
I �tOD'
II
/'0' /lip
lip
/`F:1D
10+00 11400
ATTENTION CONTRACTORS
The Canshucbdn Contractor responsible for the extension of water, sewer and/or reuse, as approved in these
Plane, is responsible for cantaclino the ENGINEERING SERVICES at (9 19) 996-2409, and the PUBLIC UTILITIES
DEPARTMENT at (919) 9964540 at least twenty four no prior to beginning any of their constnlctlon.
FAILURE to notify both City Departments in advance of beginning Constrecfion, will result in the issuance of
monetary fines, and require reinstallation of any water or sewer facilities not inspected as a result of this notification
failure.
FAILURE to call for Inspection, Install a Downstream Plug, have Permitted! Plans on Job site, or any other Violation
of City of Raleigh Standards will result in a Fine and Possible Exclusion from future work in the City of Raleigh.
12.00 13+06 14+00 16+00 16+00 17+00 17-50
30 0 15 30 60
L PR MR MR
•
1 INCH = 30 FEET
Kllaei a111aPe YO.OW.
NOTE: 100 YEAR WEE = 404.811(NAND BB) J 0 1.5 J 6 Cal 6efo a you ft
I INCH s 3 FEET FOR REVIEW ONLY
o?'bFdcs`�Id�yr
a SEAL 1•
=x � 942236 � _—
iy
Public
Sewer Collection / Extension System
Re City of Rdegh --t. to the connection ane evtentIm of Me
CRY. pwk sewer etettem a. Mawr m Ole plan. Re m.terw and
Coni0m.ti m methods wed for this pro)wt ehdl oanPorm to Oe
.tadod. and V.Ifl etlon. of Me C11ye PaWk U110U. Handbook.
sty d Rdrlph
Pub& Utli a.pmr-k P—H If
uthedmibn to C_. d
CONCURRENT REVIEW APPROVAL
CITY OF RALEIGH - PLANS AUTHORIZED FOR CONSTRUCTION
Plane for Me proposed use haw been reNawed tar genual
omPlimw with applimble codes. This limited re and
authorizotlm for Canstrucllm Is not to be omadwed to
rep .... nt total compllanc. with dgal l lerequirements for
development and crostructlm. The property owner, design
m Runts, and contractors me responsible for
ompli-ce with ap oppll-bisCity. State and Fedwal Iowa. Thi,
specific—thodsotim bed.. is not a permit, no shall it be
constmed to permit my violation of City. State o Federal Low.
NI Cmatruetim ..at be In 0000rdonoe with all Lard, Stale.
and Federal Rules and Regul.U.. .
TRANSPORTATION FIELD SEANCES
PUBLIC UnUTIES _
STORMWATER
PLANNING/ZONING .
FRE
URBAN FORESTRY_
am„W
a
—m
S2
��
D z.m*
�t'Q�QoJJ�CCm
W
i
0
w
i°.IN6R4Z
Ao
o ?
EXISTING GRADE
Mi
5 �
405�
405
30” RCP
400400
rcwr
�m
�$5
206.65 EPDXY
ATEO 11' DIP 0.23%
176.10'EPDXY COATS
it Dip @6.31%
0
208.6TEPDXY CDATE01
DIP X0.34%
395
395
�O
fr
@sem
390
390
yr�Y
385
1
1
1
385
ca
cs
r,
s
�
cs
a
r,
a
�
s
c.
a
cp
u
cp
v
cp
cp
ca
ro
cn
<p
9
cs
w
cp
ca
c�
cp
�
10+00 11400
ATTENTION CONTRACTORS
The Canshucbdn Contractor responsible for the extension of water, sewer and/or reuse, as approved in these
Plane, is responsible for cantaclino the ENGINEERING SERVICES at (9 19) 996-2409, and the PUBLIC UTILITIES
DEPARTMENT at (919) 9964540 at least twenty four no prior to beginning any of their constnlctlon.
FAILURE to notify both City Departments in advance of beginning Constrecfion, will result in the issuance of
monetary fines, and require reinstallation of any water or sewer facilities not inspected as a result of this notification
failure.
FAILURE to call for Inspection, Install a Downstream Plug, have Permitted! Plans on Job site, or any other Violation
of City of Raleigh Standards will result in a Fine and Possible Exclusion from future work in the City of Raleigh.
12.00 13+06 14+00 16+00 16+00 17+00 17-50
30 0 15 30 60
L PR MR MR
•
1 INCH = 30 FEET
Kllaei a111aPe YO.OW.
NOTE: 100 YEAR WEE = 404.811(NAND BB) J 0 1.5 J 6 Cal 6efo a you ft
I INCH s 3 FEET FOR REVIEW ONLY
o?'bFdcs`�Id�yr
a SEAL 1•
=x � 942236 � _—
iy
Public
Sewer Collection / Extension System
Re City of Rdegh --t. to the connection ane evtentIm of Me
CRY. pwk sewer etettem a. Mawr m Ole plan. Re m.terw and
Coni0m.ti m methods wed for this pro)wt ehdl oanPorm to Oe
.tadod. and V.Ifl etlon. of Me C11ye PaWk U110U. Handbook.
sty d Rdrlph
Pub& Utli a.pmr-k P—H If
uthedmibn to C_. d
CONCURRENT REVIEW APPROVAL
CITY OF RALEIGH - PLANS AUTHORIZED FOR CONSTRUCTION
Plane for Me proposed use haw been reNawed tar genual
omPlimw with applimble codes. This limited re and
authorizotlm for Canstrucllm Is not to be omadwed to
rep .... nt total compllanc. with dgal l lerequirements for
development and crostructlm. The property owner, design
m Runts, and contractors me responsible for
ompli-ce with ap oppll-bisCity. State and Fedwal Iowa. Thi,
specific—thodsotim bed.. is not a permit, no shall it be
constmed to permit my violation of City. State o Federal Low.
NI Cmatruetim ..at be In 0000rdonoe with all Lard, Stale.
and Federal Rules and Regul.U.. .
TRANSPORTATION FIELD SEANCES
PUBLIC UnUTIES _
STORMWATER
PLANNING/ZONING .
FRE
URBAN FORESTRY_
_w
J
U cx�
W CL
D 46
W O z
Q
Q CL
W F—
z z
O
Q F—_ Q)
O U
W � w
_ (j
�zw
O
U Cr
W Q
� `z^^
V)
DATE., APR 2018
DRAWN BY: JEW
CHECKED BY: PLC
REVISIONS
N0. I DATE
SCALE
1 "=30' H
1 "=3' V
PROJECT
50079798
C22
24 OF .T7
a
��
D z.m*
�t'Q�QoJJ�CCm
W
i
0
w
i°.IN6R4Z
Ao
_w
J
U cx�
W CL
D 46
W O z
Q
Q CL
W F—
z z
O
Q F—_ Q)
O U
W � w
_ (j
�zw
O
U Cr
W Q
� `z^^
V)
DATE., APR 2018
DRAWN BY: JEW
CHECKED BY: PLC
REVISIONS
N0. I DATE
SCALE
1 "=30' H
1 "=3' V
PROJECT
50079798
C22
24 OF .T7

Lr -
C -D
0 X,
\:SVVALLUVVVV UR
tp
4
,AJ AF
Lr -
C -D
0 X,
\:SVVALLUVVVV UR
tp
4

SECTION F - PREVIOUS APPROVAL LETTERS (404 & 401/BUFFER)

DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY
WILMINGTON DISTRICT, CORPS OF ENGINEERS
P.O. BOX 1890 5 • ' � �-_ �`- _`.., � ...
WILMINGTON, NORTH CAROLINA 28402-1890
2005; _iz
..
IN REPLY REFER M
Regulatory Division
Action ID No. 200420766
Mr. Carl R. Dawson Jr.
City of Raleigh
Public Works Department
Post Office Box 590
City of Raleigh, NC 27602-0590
Dear Mr. Dawson:
October 20, OGT 2 4. fI,,.,�
On September 18, 2005, Mr. Chris Brown with Dewberry and Davis, Inc. applied for a
Department of the Army permit on your behalf to authorize impacts to 460 linear feet of stream
channel, 6.7 acres of open water, and 0.941 acre of wetlands associated with the White Oak Lake
Reconstruction/Reuse Project. The site contains Simmons Branch, and adjacent wetlands, in the
Neuse River Basin, and is located on the west side of US Interstate 440, south of Melbourne
Road, in Raleigh, Wake County, North Carolina.
Numerous comments were received in response to the Public Notice for the project, issued
on September 2, 2005. Generally, the comments we have received have expressed support for
the proposed project. We are forwarding copies of all the responses we received for your review
and consideration.
The North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission (NCWRC) provided comments by
letter dated September 30, 2005. The letter raised concerns regarding the location of the
proposed forebay, and suggested that the forebay be constructed in areas that are currently
impounded. The letter also provided several recommendations for ways to reduce impacts to
fish and wildlife resources. Please review the attached letter and respond to this office, in
writing, on or before December 11, 2005.
Should you have any further questions related to DA permits for this project, please
contact me at 919-876-8441, extension 26.

Sincerely,
Todd J. Tugwell
Regulatory Project Manager,
Raleigh Field Office
Enclosures
Copy Furnished (with enclosures):
Mr. Amid Sachan
Dewberry & Davis, Inc.
2301 Rexwoods Drive
Raleigh, NC 27607-3366

Re: Corps Action ID# 200420766 * AE U E 1 V Eli
Dear Mr. Tugwell: 5EP 12 2005
I support the City of Raleigh's efic
its
Oft ymtioittLndbAair
watersheds, including Simmons Branch in West Raleigh. White
Oak Lake is a proven and Important water quality and quantity
controtfeature for Simmons Branch. Restoring the lake by
removing sediment, fixing the dam, and improving its capacity to
process pollutants will greatly improve water quality. If the dam
were removed, it would negatively impact water quality bath
locally and down the Neuse Rlver:
Please approve the permits necessary to restore Simmons Brancl
and White Oak Lake.
Sincerely,
Re: Corps Action ID# 200420766
Dear Mr. Tugweli:
I support the City of Raleigh's efforts to restore our urban
watersheds, including Simmons Branch In West Raleigh. White
Oak Lake Is a proven and Important water quality and quantity
control feature for Simmons Branch. Restoring the lake by
removing sediment, fixing the dam, and Improving its capacity to
..process pollutants will greatly improve water quality. if the dam
were removed, it would negatively impact water quality both
locally and down the Neuse. River.
Please approve the permits necessary to restore Simmons Brancl
and White Oak Lake.
Sincerely,
%/l U✓f � ja` /of

RECEIVED
Re: Corps Action ID# 200420766 �� Z00� , .1
Dear Mr, Tugwell:
FGH REGULATORY FIELD OFFICE
I support the City of Raleigh's effo o res ore our urban
watersheds, including Simmons Branch in West Raleigh. White
Oak Lake is a proven and Important water quality and quantity
control feature for Simmons Branch. Restoring.the lake by
removing sediment, fixing the dam, and Improving its capacity to
process pollutants will greatly improve water quality. if the dam
were removed, it would negatively impact water quality both
locally and down the Neuse River.
Please approve the permits necessary to restore Simmons Brancl
and White Oak Lake.
Sincerely,
C
jj-CU'a A�
2,776,06
Re: Corps Action 1D# 200420766 RECEIVE
Dear Mr. Tugwell•SEP 2 ZOtlS
I support the City of Raleigh's efforts to restore our urban
watersheds, including Simmons 81�=11te
Oak Lake is a proven and important Mir" qua ty an
control feature for Simmons Branch. Restoring the lake by
removing sediment, fixing the dam, and Improving its capacity to
process pollutants will greatly Improve water quality. If the dam
were removed, it would negatively Impact water quality both
locally and down the Neuse River.
Please approve the permits necessary to restore Simmons Brancl
and White Oak Lake.
Sincerely,
..,a- `9,
S1kgK - S. 6tt►vhS' -

Re: Corps Action IN 200420766
Dear Mr. Tugwell:
RECEIVE
I support the City of Raleigh's efforts to restore our urban
watersheds, Including Simmons Branch in WftaiejiAMlte
Oak Lake Is a proven ,and Important water quality and quantity
control feature for.Simmons Branch. Re� �iiii��ii�"b��a"c�to�
removing sediment fixing the damn anis
process pollutants will greatly improve water quality. If the dam
were removed, It would negatively4impact water quality both
locally and down the Neuse Rlve.
Please approve the permits necessary to restore Simmons Branch
and White Oak Lake. '
;Stncerely, �� ��
c �
-
f ,
Re: Corps Action IN 200420766
Dear Mr. Tugwell:
RECEIVE
I support the City of Raleigh's efforts to restore our urban
watersheds, Including Simmons Branch in WftaiejiAMlte
Oak Lake Is a proven ,and Important water quality and quantity
control feature for.Simmons Branch. Re� �iiii��ii�"b��a"c�to�
removing sediment fixing the damn anis
process pollutants will greatly improve water quality. If the dam
were removed, It would negatively4impact water quality both
locally and down the Neuse Rlve.
Please approve the permits necessary to restore Simmons Branch
and White Oak Lake. '
;Stncerely, �� ��

Re: Corps Action ID# 20042076.6
Dear Mr. Tugwell:
I support the City of Raleigh's efforts to restore our urban
watersheds, including Simmons Branch -.in West Raleigh. White
Oak Lake Is a proven and important water quality and quantity
control feature for Simmons Branch. Restoring the lake by .
removing sediment, fixing the dam, and Improving its capacity to
process pollutants. will greatly improve water quality. If the dam
were removed, it would negatively impact water quality' both
locally and down the Neuse River..
Please approve the permits necessary to restore Simmons Brancl
and White Oak Lake.
Sincerely,
u

m I _FPS on I—rr bJU4wsum
Dear Mr. Tugwell:
I support the City of Raleigh's efforts to restore our urbane•
watersheds, including Simmons Branch in West Raleigh. White
Oak Lake is a proven and Important water quality and quantity -
control feature for Simmons Branch. Restoring the lake by '
removing sediment, fixing the dam, and Improving its capacitito
process pollutants will greatly improve water quality. If the dam,
were removed, it would negatively Impact water quality both `
locally and down the Neuse River.
Please approve the permits necessary to restore Simmons Brancl
and White Oak Lake.
Sincerely,
Re: Corps Action IN 200420766
Dear Mr. Tugwell: -
I support the City of Raleigh's efforts to restore our urban
watersheds, including Simmons Branch in -West Raleigh. White
Oak Lake is a proven and Important water quality and quantity
control feature for Simmons Branch. Restoring the lake by
removing sediment, fixing the dam, and improving its capacity,to
process pollutants will greatly--.Vnprove water quality. if the dam
were removed, it would negativly=impact water quality both
locally and down the Neuse River:
Please approve the permits necessary to restore Simmons Brancl
and White Oak Lake. 6
Sincerely,
Re: Corps Action IN 200420766
Dear Mr. Tugwell:
I support the City of Raleigh's efforts to restore our urban
watersheds, including Simmons.Branch In West Raleigh. White
Oak Lake is a proven and Important water quality and quantity
control feature for Simmons Branch. Restoring the lake by
removing sediment, fixing the dam,.and improving its capacity to
process pollutants will greatly improve water quality. If the dam
were removed, it -would negatively impact water quality both
locally and down the Neuse River.
Please approve the permits necessary to restore Simmons Brancl
and White Oak Lake.
Sincerely, , r
Re: Corps Action IN 200420766
Dear Mr. Tugwell:
1 support the City of Raleigh's efforts to restore our urban
watersheds, including Simmons Branch In West Raleigh. White
Oak Lake is a proven and important water quality and q4antity
control feature for Simmons Branch. Restoring the lake by
removing sediment, fixing the dam,,and Improving its capacity to
Process pollutants will greatly improve water quality. If the dam
were removed, It -would negatively impact water quality both
locally and down the Neuse River.
Please approve the permits necessary to restore Simmons Brancl
and White Oaktake:
Sincere ,
r

k#1 F; Ion D04__. _6
Dear Mr, Tugweli:
I support the City of Raleigh's et{'tiarts to restore our urban
watersheds, Including Simmons Branch In West Raleigh., White
Oak Lake is a proven and important water quality and quah*y
control feature for Simmons Branch. Restoring the lake by '
removing sediment„ fbting the dam, and lmpi ovtng Re capacity to
Process pollutants will .greatly improve water quality. N the dam
were removed, it would negatively Impact water quality both
locally and down the Neuse River.
Please approve the permits necessary to restore Simmons Brancl
and White Oak Lake.
Sincerely, da.
Re: corps Action iD# 200420766
Dear Mr. Tugwell:
I support the City of Raleigh's efforts to restore our urban
watershsda, Including Simmons Branch In Wast Raleigh. Whits
Oak Lake is a proven ind Important water quality and qua i ty
control feature for Simmons BMrW .:,*fi g thelakeby
removing sediment, fbdng the damp and Improving its capacity to
Process pollutants will groady improve water quality. N the dam
were removed, It would negad ly.lmpact water quality both
locally and down the Neuse .
Please approve the permits negsary to rea#ore Simmons Branch
and White, Oak Lake.
r
Ra: Corps Action 1D# 200420766
Dear Mr. Tugweli:
II support the City of Raleigh's efforts to restore, our urban
watersheds, Including Simmons Branch in West Raleigh, White
Oak Latae k a proven and important water quality and quantity
control feature for Simmons Branch. Restoring the lake by .
removing sediment, fbdng the darts,, and improving its capacity to
Process pollutants will greatly improve water quality. if the dam
were removed, It -would negatively impact water quality both
locally and down the Nauss River.
Ptea+ea approve the permits necessary to restore Simmons Brancl
and White Oak Lake.
Sincerely,
Re: Corps Action IDS 2oo420766
Dow Mr. Tugwell:
I support the City of Ralsigh's efbrts to restore our urban
watersheds, Including Simmons Branch In West Raleigh. White
Oak Laks Is a Proven and Important water quality and quantity.
control feature for Simmons Branck Restoring the lake by .
removing sediment, fixing the dam, and Improving its capacity to
Process pollutants will greatly improve water quality. If the dam
were removed, it would negatively Impact water quality both
locally and down the Neuse River.
PIQase approve the permits necessary to restore Simmons Brancl
and White Oak lake.
Sincerely,

-UrP - - ._lion «+Ir 2004AuraB
Dear Mr. Tugwell:
I support the City of Rablgh's worts to restore our urban .
watersheds, Including Simmons Branch In West Raleight White
Oak Lake is a proven and important water query and ud
control feature for Simmons Branah. — ties @-a--► bye'
removing sediment, fixing the dam, and improving its capacity to
process pollutants will greatly improve water quality. If the dam
were removed, it would negatively IMIpaat water quality both
locally and down the Neuse River.
Please approve the permits n ess" to restore Simmons Branc!
and White Oak Lake,
Sincerely,
'Re:,Corps Action 1D# 2oo420786
bear Mr. Tugwell:
I support the City of Raleigh's efforts to restore our urban
watersheds, including Simmons Branch In West Raleigh, Why
Oak Lake is a proven and Importarit water quality and quantity
control feature for Simmons Branch. Restating gre !aim .
removing sediment, fixing the dam, and improving its capacity to
process pollutants will greatly improve waber quality. If the dam
were removed, It would negatively impact water quality both
locally and down the Neuse River.
Please approve the Permits necessary to restore Simmons Brancl
and White Oak Lake,
Sincerely,
Re: Corps Action IN 200420766
Dear Mr. Tugwell:
I support the City of Ral+elgh's efbrts to restore our urban
watersheds, including Simmons Branch In West Raleigh. White
Oak Lake is a proven and Important water quality and quantity
control feature for Simmons Branch. Restoring the lake by
removing sediment, fixing the dam,..and Improving Its capacity. to
Process pollutants will greatly Impe water quality. If the dam
were removed, it -would negatively Impact water quality both
locally and down the Neuse River.
Please approve the permits necessary to restore Simmons Brancl
and White Oak Lake.
Sincerely,
I
Re: Corps Action tD# 200420766
Dear Mr. Tugwell:
I support the City of Raleigh's efforts to restore our urban
wsfarsh*4 Including Simmons Branch In West Raleigh. White
Oak Lake is a proven and Important water quality and quantity
control feature for Simmons Branch. Restoring the lake by
removing sediment, fixing the dam, and Improving its capacity.to
Process pollutants will greatly Improve water quality. if the.dam
were removed, it would negatively impact water quality both
locally and down the Neuse River.
Please approve the permits necessary to restore Simmons Brancl
and White Oak Lake.
Sincere

u1 W; --ion -ion 004.......6
Dear Mr. Tugwell:
1 support the City of Raleigh's efforts to restore our urbane -
watersheds, including Simmons Branch in West Raleigh, White.
Oak Lake is a proven and Important water quality and quantityi., -
control.feature for Simmons Branch. Restoring the lake by
removing sediment, fixing the dam, and Improving its capacity to
process pollutants will greatly improve water quality. If the dam,
were removed, it would negatively impact water quality both `
locally and down the Neuse River.. -
Please approve the permits necessary to restore Simmons Brancl
and White Oak Lake.
Re: Corps Action ID# 200420766 .-.
Dear Mr. Tugwell:
Re: Corps Action ID# 200420766
Dear Mr. Tugwell:
I support the City of Raleigh's efforts to restore our urban
watersheds, Including Simmons Branch in West Raleigh. White
Oak Lake is a proven and important water quality and quantity
control feature for Simmons Branch. Restoring the lake by
removing sediment, fixing the dam, and Improving its capacity to
process pollutants will greatly improve water quality. If the dam
were removed, it -would negatively impact water quality both
locally and down the Neuse River.
Please approve the permits necessary to restore Simmons Brancl
and White Oak Lake.
Sincerely, ,
I support the City of Raleigh's efforts to restore our urban
watersheds, including Simmons Branch in West Raleigh. White
Oak Lake is a proven and important water quality and quantity
control feature for Simmons Branch. Restoring the lake by
removing sediment, fixing the dam, and -Improving its capacity to
Process pollutants will greatly improve water quality. If the dam
were removed, it would negatively impact water quality both
locally and down the Neuse River..
Please. approve the permits necessary to restore Simmons Brancl
and White Oak Lake.
Sincerely,`
J �

Tuawell, Todd J SAW
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Ron,
ZOCY -1 207 G
DD
Manuele, Jean B SAW
Friday, September 23, 2005 1:16 PM
smtp-Sechler, Ron; Tugwell, Todd J SAW
RE: NMFS No Resources Itr
Todd has received a copy of this e-mail and now you have his address. It is [e-mail]
Hope all is well Ron. Talk with you soon.
By the way, do you happen to have any comments regarding the removal of Lowell Mill Dam for purposes of restoring
the anadramous fish runs? Public notice went out today.
Jean B. Manuele
-----Original Message -----
From: Ron Sechler,[maiIto: [e-mail]]
Sent: Friday, September 23, 2005 2:07 PM
To: Manuele, Jean B SAW
Subject: NMFS No Resources Itr
Jean,
Please forward this to Todd Tugwell. Todd please send me your email
address.
Ron
National Marine Fisheries Service
Southeast Regional Office
263 13th Avenue South
St. Petersburg, Florida 33701
September 23, 2005
Colonel John E. Pulliam, Jr.
District Engineer, Wilmington District
Department of the Army, Corps of Engineers
Regulatory Division
P. O. Box 1890
Wilmington, North Carolina 28402-1890
Deas Colonel Pulliam:
I

The -National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS) has reviewed plans
advertised in the following public notice(s). The resources involved
are not ones for which NMFS is responsible and, therefore, we have no
comments regarding authorization by the Department of the Army.
NOTICE NO. APPLICANT NOTICE DATE DUE DATE
200420766 City of Raleigh 09/02/05 10/03/05
These comments do not satisfy your consultation responsibilities under
Section 7 of the Endangered Species Act of 1973, as amended. If any
activity(ies) "may effect" listed species and habitats under NMFS
purview, consultation should be initiated with our Protected Species
Division at the letterhead address.
Sincerely,
Ron Sechler (for)
Miles M. Croom
Assistant Regional Administrator
Habitat Conservation Division
z

FAX COVER
Date 09/30/05
Number of pages including cover sheet 3
To: Todd Tugwell
Phone [phone]
Fax Phone [phone]
CC:
NC Wildlife Resources Commission
Habitat Conservation Program
P. D. Box 129
Sedalia, NC 27342-4129
From: Shari Bryant ,
Phone [phone]
Fax Phone [phone]
REMARKS:
El', urgent ❑_ For your review ❑ Reply ASAP ❑ Please comment
Action ID 200420766 - White Oak Lake Reconstntction/Reuse Project; Wake County.

• r
t
Page 2
30 September 2005
White Oak Lake Reconstruction/Reuse Project
Action ID No. 200420766
Impacts include 460 linear feet of stream channel, 6.7 acres of open water, 0.308 acre of
permanent wetland and 0.633 acre of temporary wetland impact. The applicant does not propose to
mitigate for impacts resulting from the project because the primary purpose of the project is to improve
water quality and provide increased stormwatea retention resulting in the reduction of the 10 -year, 24-
hour Beak outflow by approximately 50a/a.
It is unclear whether the forebay would be constructed in an area that is already impounded or
whether free-tlowing stream channel would be impounded or excavated to create the forebay. We prefer
the forebay to be constructed in areas of the lake that are currently impounded. If the applicant proposes
to impound or excavate free-flowing stream channel to create the forebay this will remove the natural
functionality of the stream and we feel that mitigation for impact to stream channels should be performed
according to the Stream Mitigation Guidelines (April 2003).
We will not object to the project provided the following conditions are incorporated into the
permit to reduce impacts to fish and wildlife resources -
1 We recommend that all remaining wetlands and streams on the site should be protected from
additional impacts by placing them in a permanent conservation easement to prohibit filling,
draining, flooding, and excavation.
2. Should the water level need to be lowered to perform the dam construction and dredging we
request that the lake be lowered and the work completed, if possible, between 15 October and 15
March to minimize fish stress and chance of a fish kill.
3. Should the lake remain at normal pool during the dredging, we request that dredging not occur
between 15 March and 15 July. Fish spawn in spring and young fish occupy near shore habitats
in early summa. Prohibiting dredging during this time period will minimize impacts to the fish
population in the lake.
4. All sediment removed is deposited in upland areas or is disposed of at an approved facility.
5. Specialized efforts and techniques are implemented to reduce sediment runoff from construction
activities: Excessive silt and sediment loads can have numerous detrimental effects on aquatic
resources including destruction of spawning habitat, suffocation of eggs, and clogging of gills of
aquatic species -
6. Concrete is toxic to aquatic life and should not be allowed to come in contact with surface waters
until cured.
7. Should free-flowing stream channels be impacted by construction of the sediment pool, a
mitigation plan should be submitted and approved before impacts occur
Thank you for the opportunity to comment on this project. If we can provide further assistance,
please contact our office at [phone].
cc_ Cyndi Karoly, DWQ

North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission 0
Richard B. Hamilton, Executive Director
TO: Todd TugweIl, Raleigh Regulatory Field Office
U.S.GL.BryianMtPi
CEngineers
FROM: Sharmont Rem
io Coordinator
Habitat Conservation Program
DATE: 30 September 2005
SUBJECT: Public Notice for City of Raleigh, White Oak Lake Reconstruction/Reuse Project, Wake
County, North Carolina. Action ID No. 200420766
Biologists with the North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission (NCWRC) have reviewed the
subject document and are familiar with the habitat values of the area. Our comments are provided in
accordance with provisions of the Clean Water Act of 1977 (as amended), Fish and Wildlife Coordination
Act (48 Stat. 401, as amended, 16 U.S.C. 661-667d), and North Carolina General Statutes (G. S. 113-131
et seq.).
The applicant proposes to rehabilitate White Oak Lake and maximize flood storage capacity
while retaining recreational uses and providing downstream water quality improvements. The lake is an
impoundment of Simmons Branch, a tributary to Walnut Creek in the Neuse River basin. There are
records for the federal species of concern and state special concern Carolina madtom (Aroturus f iHosus),
and the federal species of concern and state significantly rare pinewoods shiner (Lythrurus matulinus) and
Roanoke bass (4nibloplites cavifrons) in Walnut Creek downstream of Lake Raleigh.
The project involves the excavation of sediment from the lake bed and reconstruction of the dam
and spillway structures. The dam would be rebuilt upstream in an area that is currently impounded. The
new dam would be parallel to the I-440 beltline to allow for future improvements to the interstate. The .
new dam would have a riser barrel spillway with drawdown orifices to carry normal flows and an
overflow channel_ A stilling basin and step pool are proposed downstream of the primary spillway to
reduce water velocity. The stream channel between the dam and interstate would be re -graded to flatten
the slope. Dredging would occur primarily in the western portion of the lake. The edges would be re-
graded to maximize flood storage and.to create a 20 -foot wide shallow wetland shelf around the perimeter
of the lake. A forebay would be constructed in the upper end of the lake for periodic removal of
accumulated sediment. A step pool would be constructed approximately 100 feet upstream of the forebay
to provide a controlled drop in the elevation of the stream bed.

919-881-9923 fax
919-604-1455 cell
www.dewbefrv.com
OU 20 20Q%
Ma& bzt S;
CAW _
a,V�
z

OFVVnIr� .......... «..�, ....
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
co r North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
"I Alan W. Klimek, P.E. Director
Division of Water Quality
October 6, 2006
DWQ Project # 06-1565
Wake County
CERTIFIED MAIL: RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Mr. Carl Dawson
City of Raleigh D
222 West Hargett Street OCT 10 2006
Raleigh, NC 27601
DEWBERRY & DAVII
Subject Property: White Oak Lake Reconstruction
Simmons Branch [030402,27-34-2, C, NSW]
REQUEST FOR MORE INFORMATION
Dear Mr. Dawson:
On October 4, 2006, the Division of Water Quality (DWQ) received your application dated
March 24, 2005 to impact 0.941 acres of wetland (0.308 acres permanent wetland impact, 0.633
acres temporary wetland impact), 460 linear feet of stream, 6.7 acres of open water, and 10,800
square feet of permanent impacts to Zone 1 Neuse River basin protected riparian buffer, and
91,300 square feet of temporary impacts to Zone 1 Neuse River basin protected riparian buffer,
and 25,200 square feet of temporary impacts to Zone 2 Neuse River basin protected riparian
buffer to conduct the White Oak Lake reconstruction project. The DWQ has determined that
your application was incomplete and/or provided inaccurate information as discussed below.
The DWQ will require additional information in order to process your application to impact
protected wetlands and/or streams on the subject property. Therefore, unless we receive five
copies of the additional information requested below, we will have to move toward denial of
your application as required by 15A NCAC 2H .0506 and will place this project on hold as
incomplete until we receive this additional information. Please provide the following
information so that we may continue to review your project.
Additional Information Requested:
1. The cover letter dated October 4, 2006, to your application states that Public Notice for
the project is included in your submission, however, we cannot locate it within your
submitted materials. Please provide five copies of the Public Notice for the project so
that we may commence our review of your application.
Please respond within three weeks of the date of this letter by sending this information to me in
writing and Eric Kulz of the DWQ Raleigh Regional Office. If we do not hear from you within
NZ Caro4na
401 oversight/Express Review Permitting Unit ✓ "tura"J
1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1650
2321 Crabtree Boulevard, Suite 250, Raleigh North Carolina 27604
Phone: [phone] / FAX [phone] / Internet: httn://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer — 50% Recycled/ IWo Post Consumer Paper

City of Raleigh
Page 2 of 2
October 6, 2006
three weeks, we will assume that you no longer want to pursue this project and we will consider
the project as withdrawn.
This letter only addresses the application review and does not authorize any impacts to wetlands,
waters or protected buffers. Please be aware that any impacts requested within your application
are not authorized (at this time) by the DWQ. Please call Ms. Cyndi Karoly or Mr. Ian
McMillan at 919-733-1786 if you have any questions regarding or would like to set up a meeting
to discuss this matter.
CBK/ijm
Dyndi Karroly, Supervisor
401 Oversight/Express Review Permitting Unit
cc: Eric Kulz, DWQ Raleigh Regional Office
USACE Raleigh Regulatory Field Office
File Copy
Central Files
Amit Sachan, Dewberry, 2301 Rexwoods Drive, Suite 200, Raleigh, NC 27607-3366
Filename: 061565W6ite0aklAkeReconsWaction(Wake)Oa Hold

Dewberry
�nniceTs ��i
October 16, 2006
Ms. Cyndi Karoly
North Carolina Division of Water Quality
2321 Crabtree Blvd
Raleigh, NC 27604
2301 Rexwoods Drive 919 661 9939
Suite 200 919 881 9923 fax
Raleigh, North Carolina 27607-3366 www.dewberry.com
Reference: City of Raleigh
White Oak Lake Reconstruction/Reuse
Dewberry Project Number 73116900
Dear Ms. Karoly:
On behalf of the City of Raleigh Dewberry & Davis, Inc. would like to provide the additional information
requested in the `Request for more information' Notification dated October 06, 2006 for the above
referenced project. Attached are five (5) copies of the Public Notice sent out on September 02, 2005 by
Corps of Engineers (COE) after receipt of 404 Permit Application.
We look forward to your review and comments for this important project for the City of Raleigh. Please
call [phone] or email (asachan ,dewberrv.com) if you have any questions.
Sincerely,
Dewberry & Davis, Inc.
Amit Sachan, EI, CFM
Enclosures
c: Eric Kulz, DWQ Raleigh Regional Office
Mark Senior, PE, City of Raleigh
Mike Hanson, PE, Dewberry
W:\projects\73116900\Admin\Conespondence\karoly letter- 10 1 606.doc
Dewberry & Davis, Inc.
OCTp@[Now2p
16 Zoos
DENR - WATER QUAUTY
MMM AND SMRIIW M BRANCH

2301 Rexwoods Drive
919 881 9939
• teiw erry Suite 200 919 881 9923 fax
Raleigh, North Carolina 27607-3366 919
_.._ dy.com
October 16, 2006
Ms. Cyndi Karoly
North Carolina Division of Water Quality
2321 Crabtree Blvd
Raleigh, NC 27604
Reference: City of Raleigh
White Oak Lake Reconstruction/Reuse
Dewberry Project Number 73116900
Dear Ms. Karoly:
On behalf of the City of Raleigh Dewberry $Davis, Inc. would like to provide the additional inf
requested in the 'Request for more information, Notification dated October referenced project. Attached are five S 06, 2006 for the above
Corps of Engineers () copses of the Public Notice sent out on September 02, 2005 by
gmeers (COE) after receipt of 404 Permit Application.
We look forward to your review and
call [phone] or comments for this
email important project for the City of Raleigh.
(asachan(a�dewberry cnT„1
if YOU have any questions. Please
Sincerely,
Dewberry & Davis, Inc.
Amit Sachan, EL CFM
Enclosures
c: Eric Kidz, DWQ Raleigh Regional Office
Mark Senior, PE, City of Raleigh
Mike Hanson, PE, Dewberry
w: projects1731169001Adminl u,,5pond.we\immh, ietta_101606.doc
Dewberry & Canis, inc.

Location of Raleigh Regional Office
�ALH
Regional Office
Page 1 of l
4
lb
409
70
`
y►
144
�
;soot Drive
Directions
40
Raleigh tan, and oNK:
t"o Rocky
tMount �
Take 1-440 to the Six forks Rc
South Exit. Continue south or
RALEIGH
Forks to Barrett Drive. Turn left-
eftBarrett.
Barrett.
The Raleigh Regional Office is
second building on the right.
40
1
DENR HOME RALEIGH
Location: 3800 Barrett Drive • Raleigh, NC 27609
Mailing Address: 1628 Mail Service Center • Raleigh, NC 27699-1628
919-791-4200 • FAX: [phone]
http://www.enr.state.nc.us/regionaloffices/offices/raleighwhere.htmi 10/16/2006

1 1
US Army Corps PUBLIC NOTICE
Of Engineers
Wilmington District
Issue Date: September 2, 2005
Comment Deadline: October 3, 2005
Corps Action ID #: 200420766
All interested parties are hereby advised that the Wilmington District, Corps of Engineers
(Corps) has received an application for work within jurisdictional waters of the United
States. Specific plans and location information are described below and shown on the
attached plans. This Public Notice and all attached plans are also available on the
Wilmington District Web Site at ww%%.saw.utiace.army.mil/wetlands
Applicant: City of Raleigh
Attn: Mr. Carl R. Dawson Jr.
Public Works Department
Post Office Box 590
City of Raleigh, NC 27602-0590
Authority
The Corps will evaluate this application and decide whether to issue, conditionally issue,
or deny the proposed work pursuant to the applicable procedures of Section 404 of the
Clean Water Act.
Location
The project, know as the White Oak Lake Reconstruction/Reuse Project, is located on the
west side of US Interstate 440, south of Melbourne Road, in Raleigh, Wake County,
North Carolina. Coordinates (in decimal degrees) for the site are 35.7756° North,
78.7147 ° West. The project site contains Simmons Branch, and adjacent wetlands, in the
Neuse River Basin (8 -Digit Cataloging Unit 03020201).
Existing Site Conditions
White Oak Lake is approximately 6.7 acres in size and is located on Simmons Branch, a
tributary to Walnut Creek. The watershed draining to the lake is approximately 340 acres
and is predominately residential with a small portion of commercial area along Western
Boulevard. The lake is bounded by residential subdivisions on three sides, and by
Interstate 440 on the fourth side, which is located just downstream of the 14 foot high
dam. The watershed is almost entirely developed, and the lake has received substantial
inputs of pollutants and sediment as a result. The western portion of the lake has silted in

and now has an average water depth of only I to 2 feet. The spillway for the lake has
also experienced significant erosion and is in poor condition.
Applicant's Stated Purpose
As stated by the applicant, the objective of the project is to rehabilitate the lake and
maximize flood storage capacity while retaining recreational uses and providing
downstream water quality improvements.
Project Description
The project involves the excavation of sediment from the lakebed and the reconstruction
of the dam and spillway structures. The dam is proposed to be rebuilt in an area that is
currently in the center of the lake. It would run parallel to the I-440 Beltline. The new
location would also allow for future improvements to the interstate. The proposed dam
would have 3:1 side slopes and a top elevation of 407 feet above sea level. The new
normal water surface elevation would be reduced from the current elevation of 402 feet to
398.1 feet. The reduction in water surface has been proposed to allow additional
stormwater storage. The new dam would have a riser barrel spillway with drawdown
orifices to carry normal flows, and an overflow channel. A stilling basin and a step pool
are also proposed downstream of the primary spillway to reduce water velocity, and the
stream channel between the dam and interstate would be regraded to flatten the slope.
Excavation of accumulated sediments within the lakebed would result in a lake depth
ranging between 4 and 8 feet. The majority of the dredging would occur in the western
portion of the lake. The edges of the lake would be regraded to maximize flood storage
and create a 20 -foot wide shallow wetland shelf around the perimeter of the lake. A
forebay is proposed to be constructed in the upper end of the lake to allow periodic
removal of accumulated sediment. A step pool is also proposed to be constructed
approximately 100 feet upstream of the forebay to provide a controlled drop in the
elevation of the streambed, which is required to accommodate the new water surface
elevation.
Impacts to waters of the U.S. associated with the reconstruction of White Oak Lake
include 460 linear feet of stream channel, 6.7 acres of open water, 0.308 acre of
permanent wetland impact, and 0.633 acre of temporary wetland impact. Plans included
with this notice that show the proposed project details.
The applicant does not propose to mitigate for impacts resulting from the project because
the primary purposes of the project is to improve water quality and provide increased
stormwater retention, resulting in a reduction of the 10 -year 24-hour peak outflow by
approximately 50%.
Other Required Authorizations

This notice and all applicable application materials are being forwarded to the appropriate
State agencies for review. The Corps will generally not make a final permit decision
until the North Carolina Division of Water Quality (NCDWQ) issues, denies, or waives
State certification required by Section 401 of the Clean Water Act (PL 92-500). The
receipt of the application and this public notice in the NCDWQ Central Office in Raleigh
serves as application to the NCDWQ for certification. A waiver will be deemed to occur
if the NCDWQ fails to act on this request for certification within sixty days of the date of
the receipt of this notice in the NCDWQ Central Office. Additional information
regarding the Clean Water Act certification may be reviewed at the NCDWQ Central
Office, 401 Oversight and Express Permits Unit, 2321 Crabtree Boulevard, Raleigh,
North Carolina 27604-2260. All persons desiring to make comments regarding the
application for certification under Section 401 of the Clean Water Act should do so in
writing delivered to the North Carolina Division of Water Quality (NCDWQ), 1650 Mail
Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina, 27699-1650 Attention: Ms Cyndi Karoly by
September 26, 2005.
Essential Fish Habitat
This notice initiates the Essential Fish Habitat (EFH) consultation requirements of the
Magnuson -Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act. The Corps' initial
determination is that the proposed project will not adversely impact EFH or associated
fisheries managed by the South Atlantic or Mid Atlantic Fishery Management Councils
or the National Marine Fisheries Service.
Cultural Resources
The Corps has consulted the latest published version of the National Register of Historic
Places and is not aware that any registered properties, or properties listed as being
eligible for inclusion therein are located in the project area or will be affected by the
proposed work. Presently, unknown archeological, scientific, prehistoric, or historical
data may be located within the project area and/or could be affected by the proposed
work.
Endangered Species
The Corps has reviewed the project area, examined all information provided by the
applicant and consulted the latest North Carolina Natural Heritage Database. Based on
available information, the Corps has determined pursuant to the Endangered Species Act
of 1973, that the proposed project will have no effect on federally listed endangered or
threatened species or their formally designated critical habitat.
Evaluation
The decision whether to issue a permit will be based on an evaluation of the probable
impacts, including cumulative impacts, of the proposed activity on the public interest.
That decision will reflect the national concern for both protection and utilization of

important resources. The benefit which reasonably may be expected to accrue from the
proposal must be balanced against its reasonably foreseeable detriments. All factors
which may be relevant to the proposal will be considered including the cumulative effects
thereof; among those are conservation, economics, aesthetics, general environmental
concerns, wetlands, historic properties, fish and wildlife values, flood hazards, Flood plain
values (in accordance with Executive Order 11988), land use, navigation, shoreline
erosion and accretion, recreation, water supply and conservation, water quality, energy
needs, safety, food and fiber production, mineral needs, considerations of property
ownership, and, in general, the needs and welfare of the people. For activities involving
the discharge of dredged or fill materials in waters of the United States, the evaluation of
the impact of the activity on the public interest will include application of the
Environmental Protection Agency's 404(b)(1) guidelines.
Commenting Information
The Corps is soliciting comments from the public; Federal, State and local agencies and
officials, including any consolidate State Viewpoint or written position of the Governor;
Indian Tribes and other interested parties in order to consider and evaluate the impacts of
this proposed activity. Any comments received will be considered by the Corps to
determine whether to issue, modify, condition or deny a permit for this proposal. To
make this decision, comments are used to assess impacts on endangered species, historic
properties, water quality, general environmental effects and the other public interest
factors listed above. Comments are used in the preparation of an Environmental
Assessment (EA) and/or an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) pursuant to the
National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA). Comments are also used to determine the
need for a public hearing and to determine the overall public interest of the proposed
activity.
Any person may request, in writing, within the comment period specified in this notice,
that a public hearing be held to consider the application. Requests for public hearings
shall state, with particularity, the reasons for holding a public hearing. Requests for a
public hearing shall be granted, unless the District Engineer determines that the issues
raised are insubstantial or there is otherwise no valid interest to be served by a hearing.
Written comments pertinent to the proposed work, as outlined above, will be received
by the Corps of Engineers, Wilmington District, until 5pm, October 3, 2005. Comments
should be submitted to Todd Tugwell, Raleigh Regulatory Field Office, 6508 Falls of the
Neuse Road, Suite 120, Raleigh, NC 27615.
Distribution:
Mr. Carl R. Dawson Jr. (Applicant)
City of Raleigh
Public Works Department

Post Office Box 590
City of Raleigh, NC 27602-0590
Mr. Amid Sachan
Dewberry & Davis, Inc.
2301 Rexwoods Drive
Raleigh, NC 27607-3366
Ms. Cyndi Karoly
North Carolina Division of Water Quality (NCDWQ)
1650 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1650
2 Mr. Ron Mikulak, Chief
Wetlands Section -Region IV
Water Management Division
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
61 Forsyth Street, SW
Atlanta, Georgia 30303
Mr. Peter Benjamin
United States Fish and Wildlife Service
Post Office Box 33726
Raleigh, NC 27636-3726
Congressman Brad Miller (Washington, D.C. Office)
1300 St. Mary's Street, Suite 504
Raleigh, NC 27605
Congressman Brad Miller (Local Office)
1722 Longworth Building
Washington, DC 20515
2 Mr. Doug Huggett, North Carolina Division of Coastal Management
Hestron Plaza II 151 B
Highway 24
Morehead City, North Carolina 28557
20 Attached Mailing List (Adjoining Properties)
Postmaster, Raleigh, North Carolina 27606

February 5, 2008
Regulatory Division
Action ID. 200420766
City of Raleigh
Attn: Mr. Carl R. Dawson, Jr.
222 West Hargett Street
Raleigh, NC 27601
Dear Mr. Dawson:
FEB 7 �6
In accordance with your written request of August 5, 2005, and the ensuing
administrative record, enclosed are two copies of a permit to authorize the proposed
placement of fill material into 460 linear feet of a perennial stream, 0.941 acres of
wetland (0.308 acres permanent and 0.633 acres temporary), and 6.7 acres of open water
for the reconstruction of White Oak Lake located within the City of Raleigh, Wake
County, North Carolina (Lat. 35.7760N, Long.—78.7150W). The lake is on Simmons
Branch in the Neuse River Basin (Hydrologic Unit Code 03020201).
You should acknowledge that you accept the terms and conditions of the enclosed
permit by signing and dating each copy in the spaces provided ("Permittee" on page 3).
Your signature, as permittee, indicates that, as consideration for the issuance of this
permit, you voluntarily accept and agree to comply with all of the terms and conditions of
this permit. All pages of both copies of the signed permit with drawings should then be
returned to this office for final authorization. A self-addressed envelope is enclosed for
your convenience.
Title 33, Part 325.1(f), of the Code of Federal Regulations reads, in part, that,
"Agencies or instrumentalities of federal, state, or local governments will not be required
to pay any fee in connection with permits." Accordingly, nn checkshouM,accompany
the signed and dated copies of your permit.
This correspondence contains a proffered permit for the above described site. If
you object to this decision, you may request an administrative appeal under Corps
regulations at 33 CFR Part 331. Enclosed you will find a Notification of Appeal Process
(NAP) fact sheet and request for appeal (RFA) form. If you request to appeal this
decision you must submit a completed RFA form to the South Atlantic Division, Division
Office at the Following address:

Mr. Michael F. Bell, Administrative Appeal Review Officer
CESAD-ET-CO-R
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, South Atlantic Division
60 Forsyth Street, Room 9M 15
Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8801
In order for an RFA to be accepted by the Corps, the Corps must determine that it is
complete, that it meets the criteria for appeal under 33 CFR Part 331.5, and that it has
been received by the Division Office within 60 days of the date of the NAP. Should you
decide to submit an RFA form, it must be received at the above address by April 5, 2008.
**It is not necessary to submit an RFA form to the Division Office if you do not object to
the decision in contained in this correspondence.**
After the permit is authorized in this office, the original copy will be retumed to you;
the duplicate copy will be permanently retained in this office. If you have questions,
please contact Mr. Jamie Shern at the Raleigh Regulatory Field Office, telephone (919)
+' 554-4884, Extension 31.
Enclosures
Blind Copies Furnished:
Dewberry, Inc.
Attn: Michael Hanson, PE
2301 Rexwoods Drive Suite 200
Raleigh, NC 27607-3366
Sincerely,
Jean B. Manuele
Chief, Raleigh Regulatory Field Office
2

DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY PERMIT
Permittee: CITY OF RALEIGH
MR. CARL R. DAWSON, JR.
Permit No: 200420766
Issuing Office: USAED, WILMINGTON
NOTE: The term "you" and its derivatives, as used in this permit, means the permittee or any future transferee. The
term "this office" refers to the appropriate district or division office of the Corps of Engineers having jurisdiction over
the permitted activity or the appropriate official of the office acting under the authority of the commanding officer.
You are authorized to perform work in the accordance with the terms and conditions specified below.
Project Description: The project involves -the excavation of sediment from a 6.7 -acre lake and the
reconstruction of the dam and spillway structures for the purpose of improving flood water storage and
water quality. Impacts to waters of the U.S. associated with the reconstruction of White Oak Lake include
460 linear feet of stream channel, 6.7 acres of open water, 0.308 acre of permanent wetland impact, and
0.633 acre of temporary wetland impact.
Project Location: The project, known as White Oak Lake Reconstruction/Reuse Project, is located on the
west side of US Interstate 440, south of Melbourne Road in Raleigh, Wake County, North Carolina.
Coordinates (in decimal degrees) for the site are 35.7760° N; 78.7150` W. The project site contains
Simmons Branch, and adjacent wetlands, in the Neuse River Basin (8 -Digit Cataloging Unit 03020201).
Permit Conditions:
General Conditions:
1. The time Limit for completing the work authorized ends on December 31, 2013 If you find that you need more
time to complete the authorized activity, submit your request for a time extension to this office for consideration at least
one month before the above date is reached.
2. You must maintain the activity authorized by this permit in good condition and in conformance with the terms
and conditions of this permit. You are not relieved of this requirement if you abandon the permitted activity, although
you may make a good faith transfer to a third party in compliance with General Conditions 4 below. Should you wish
to cease to maintain the authorized activity or should you desire to abandon it without a good faith transfer, you must
obtain a modification of this permit from this office, which may require restoration of the area.
3. If you discover any previously unknown historic or archeological remains while accomplishing the activity
authorized by this permit, you must immediately notify this office of what you have found. We will initiate the Federal
and state coordination required to determine if the remains warrant a recovery effort or if the site eligible for listing in
the National Register of Historic Places.
ENG Form 1721, Nov 96 EDITIONS OF SEP 82 IS OBSOLETE. (33 DFR 325 (Appendix A))

4. If you sell the property associate with this permit, you must obtain the signature of the new owner in the space
provided and forward a copy of the permit to this office to validate the transfer of this authorization.
5. If a conditioned water quality certification has been issued for your project, you meat comply with the conditions
specified in the certification as special conditions to this permit. For your convenience, a copy of the certification is
attached if it contains such conditions.
6. You must albw representatives from this office to ioiO06"Nte authorized activity at any time deemed necessary to
ensure that it is being or has been accomplished in accordance with the terms and conditions of your permit.
Special Conditions:
SEE ATTACHED SPECIAL CONDITIONS
Further Information:
1. Congressional Authorities: You have been authorized to undertake the activity described above pursuant to:
( ) Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of 1899 (33 U.S. C. 403).
( X) Section 404 of the clean Water Act (33 U.S.C. 1344).
( ) Section 103 of the Marine Protection, Research and Sanctuaries Act of 1972 (33 U.S.C. 1413).
2. Limits of this authorization.
a. This permit does not obviate the need to obtain other Federal, state, or local authorizations required by law.
b. This permit does not grant any property rights or exclusive privileges.
c. This permit does not authorize any injury to the property or rights of others.
d. This permit does not authorize interference with any existing or proposed Federal project.
3. Limits of Federal Liability. In issuing this permit, the Federal Government does not assume any liability for the
following:
a. Damages to the permitted project or uses thereof as a result of other permitted or unpermitted activities or from
natural causes.
b. Damages to the permitted project or uses thereof as a result of current or future activities undertaken by or on
behalf of the United states in the public interest.
c. Damages to persons, property, or to other permitted or unpermitted activities or structures caused by the activity
authorized by this permit.
d. Design or construction deficiencies associated with the permitted work.
e. Damage claims associated with any future modification, suspension, or revocation of this permit.

4. ReliNtr'*Pp*attt's Data: The determination of this office that issuance of this permit is not contrary to the public interest was mad in reliance
on the information you provided.
5. Reevaluation of Permit Decision. This office may reevaluate its decision on this permit at any time the circumstances
warrant. Circumstances that could require a reevaluation include, but are not limited to, the following:
a. You fail to comply with the terms and conditions of this permit.
b. The information provided by you in support of your permit application proves to have been false, incomplete, or
inaccurate (see 4 above).
c. Significant new information surfaces which this office did not consider in reaching the original public interest
decision.
Such a reevaluation may result in a determination that it is appropriate to use the suspension, modification, and
revocation procedures contained in 33 CFR 325.7 or enforcement procedures such as those contained in 33CFR 326.4
and 326.5. The referenced enforcement procedures provide for the issuance of an administrative order requiring you to
comply with the terms and conditions of your permit and for the initiation of legal action where appropriate. You will
be required to pay for any corrective measures ordered by this office, and if you fail to comply with such directive, this
office may in certain situations (such as those specified in 33 CFR 209.170) accomplish the corrective measure by
contract or otherwise and bill you for the cost.
6. Extelasions. General condition 1 establishes a time limit for the completion of the activity authorized by this permit.
Unless there are circumstances requiring either a prompt completion of the authorized activity or a reevaluation of the
public interest decision, the Corps will normally give favorable consideration to a request for an extension of this time
limit.
Your signature below, as permittee, indicates that you accept and agree to comply with the terms and conditions of this
permit.
(PERMITTEE) CITY OF RALEIGH
MR. CARL R. DAWSON, JR.
(DATE)
This permit becomes effective when the Federal official, designated to act for the Secretary of the Army, has signed
below.
(DISTRICT Commander) JOHN E. PULLIAM, JR., COLONEL (DATE)
When the structures or work authorized by this permit are still in existence at the time the property is transferred, the terms and conditions of this
permit will continue to be binding on the new owner(s) of the property. To validate the transfer of this permit and the associated liabilities associated
with compliance with its terms and conditions, have the transferee sign and date below.
(Transferee)
(Date)
*U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE: 1986 — 717425

SPECIAL CONDITIONS (Action ID. 200420766; City of Raleigh/White Oak Lake
Reconstruction/Reuse)
Work Limits
a) All work authorized by this permit most be performed in strict compliance
vnth the attached plans, which are a part of this permit. Any modification
to these plans must be approved by the US Army Corps of Engineers
(USACE) prior to implementation.
b) Except as authorized by this permit or any USACE approved modification
to this permit, no excavation, fill or mechanized land -clearing activities
shall take place at any time in the construction or maintenance of this
project, within waters or wetlands. This permit does not authorize
temporary placement or double handling of excavated or fill material
within waters or wetlands outside the permitted area. This prohibition
applies to all borrow and fill activities connected with this project.
c) =Except as speci 8 in the plans attached to this permit, no excavation, fill
or mechanized land -clearing activities shall take place at any time in the
construction or maintenance of this project, in such a manner as to impair
normal flows and circulation patterns within waters or wetlands or to
reduce the reach of waters or wetlands.
d) The North Carolina Division of Water Quality (DWQ) permit/certification
number 3594 was issued for this project on November 6, 2006. Special
conditions were issued associated with this water quality
permit/certification and a copy of these conditions is attached as Exhibit
A. These referenced conditions are hereby incorporated as special
conditions of this permit.
e) The permittee shall coordinate a pre -construction meeting with the
Regulatory Project Manager at least 30 days prior to the commencement
of construction. This meeting should include the applicant, the main
contractor working within waters of the United States and any other sub-
contractors that will be responsible for work within waters of the U.S.
Related Laws
f) All mechanized equipment will be regularly inspected and maintained to
prevent contamination of waters and wetlands from fuels, lubricants,
hydraulic fluids, or other toxic materials. In the event of a spill of
petroleum products or any other hazardous waste, the permittee shall
immediately report it to the N.C. Division of Water Quality at (919) 733-
5083, Ext. 526 or [phone] and provisions of the North Carolina
Oil Pollution and Hazardous Substances Control Act will be followed.

Project Maintenance
g) The permittee shall advise the Corps in writing prior to beginning the
work authorized by this permit and again upon completion of the work
authorized by this permit.
h) Unless otherwise authorized by this permit, all fill material placed in
waters or wetlands shall be generated from an upland source and will be
clean and free of any pollutants except in trace quantities. P !'',
organic materials (including debris from land clearing activities), or
unsightly debris will not be used.
i) The permittee shall require its ctoxs- an&Or its to comply with
the terms and conditions of this permit in the construction and
maintenance of this project, and shall provide each of its contractors
and/or agents associated with the construction or maintenance of this
project with a copy of this permit. J VW4-including all
conditions, shall bold Mr ax{#l�s> sit&during construction and
maintenance of this project.
j) The permittee shall employ all dip dowand erosion control
measures necessary to prevent an increase in sedimentation or turbidity
within waters and wetlands outside the permit area. This shall include, but
is not limited to, the immediate installation of silt fencing or similar
appropriate devices around all areas subject to soil disturbance or the
movement of earthen fill, and the immediate stabilization of all disturbed
areas. Additionally, the project must remain in full compliance with all
aspects of the Sedimentation Pollution Control Act of 1973 (North
Carolina General Statutes Chapter 113A Article 4).
k) The permittee, upon receipt of amotice of revocation of this permit or
upon its expiration before completion of the work will, without expense to
the United States and in such time and manner as the Secretary of the
Army or his authorized representative may direct; t!estore the water or
wetland to. its pre -project Baan.
Enforcement
1) Violations of these conditions or violations of Section 404 of the Clean
Water Act or Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act must be reported in
writing to the Wilmington District U.S. Army Corps of Engineers within
24 hours of the permittee's discovery of the violation.

:.4
NOTIFICATION OF ADMINISTRATIVE. APPEAL OPTIONS AND PROCESS AND
REQUEST FOR APPEAL
Applicant: City of RaleiglVWhite Oak Lake File Number: 200420766 Date: February 5, 2008
Reconstruction/Reuse
Attached is:
See Section below
INITIAL PROFFERED PERMIT (Standard Permit or Letter of
A
permission)
X
PROFFERED PERMIT (Standard Permit or Letter ofpermission)
B
PERMIT DENIAL
C
APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION
D
PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION
E
SECTION I -The following identifies your rights and options regarding an administrative appeal of the above
decision. Additional information may be found at http://www.usace.army.mil/inet/ftinctions/cw/cecwo/reg or
Corps regulations at 33 CFR Part 331.
A: INITIAL PROFFERED PERMIT: You may accept or object to the permit.
• ACCEPT: Ifyou received a Standard Permit, you may sign the permit document and return it to the district engineer for final
authoruation. If you received a Letter of Permission (LOP), you may accept the LOP and your work is authorized. Your signature
on the Standard Permit or acceptance of the LOP means that yvtt_atcept the permit in its entirety, and waive all rights to appeal the
permit, including its terms and conditions, and approved jurisdictional determinations associated with the permit.
• OBJECT: If you object to the permit (Standard or LOP) because of certain terms and conditions therein, you
may request that the permit be modified accordingly. You must complete Section II of this form and return
the form to the district engineer. Your objections must be received by the district engineer within 60 days of
the date of this notice, or you will forfeit your right to appeal the permit in the future. Upon receipt of your
letter, the district engineer will evaluate your objections and may: (a) modify the permit to address all of your
concerns, (b) modify the permit to address some of your objections, or (c) not modify the permit having
determined that the permit should be issued as previously written. After evaluating your objections, the
district engineer will send you a proffered permit for your reconsideration, as indicated in Section B below.
B: PROFFERED PERMIT: You may accept or appeal the permit
• ACCEPT: If you received a Standard Permit, you may sign the permit document and return it to the district engineer for final
authorization. If you received a Letter of Permission (LOP), you may accept the LOP and your work is authorized. Your signature
on the Standard Permit or acceptance of the LOP means that you accept the permit in its entirety, and waive all rights to appeal the
permit, including its terms and conditions, and approved jurisdictional determinations associated with the permit.
• APPEAL: If you choose to decline the proffered permit (Standard or LOP) because of certain terms and
conditions therein, you may appeal the declined permit under the Corps of Engineers Administrative Appeal
Process by completing Section II of this form and sending the form to the division engineer. This form must
be received by the division engineer within 60 days of the date of this notice.
C: PERMIT DENIAL: You may appeal the denial of a permit under the Corps of Engineers Administrative
Appeal Process by completing Section II of this form and sending the form to the division engineer. This form
must be received by the division engineer within 60 days of the date of this notice.
D: APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION: You may accept or appeal the approved JD or
provide new information.
• ACCEPT: You do not need to notify the Corps to accept an approved JD. Failure to notify the Corps within 60 days of the date of
this notice, means that you accept the approved JD in its entirety, and waive all rights to appeal the approved JD.
• APPEAL: If you disagree with the approved JD, you may appeal the approved JD under the Corps of
Engineers Administrative Appeal Process by completing Section II of this form and sending the form to the
division engineer. This form must be received by the division engineer within 60 days of the date of this
notice.

E: PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION: You do not need to respond to the Corps
regarding the preliminary JD. The Preliminary JD is not appealable. If you wish, you may request an approved
JD (which may be appealed), by contacting the Corps district for further instruction. Also you may provide new
information for further consideration by the Corps to reevaluate the JD.
SECTION II - REQUEST FOR APPEAL or OBJECTIONS TO AN INITIAL PROFFERED PERMIT
REASONS FOR APPEAL OR OBJECTIONS: (Describe your reasons for appealing the decision or your
objections to an initial proffered permit in clear concise statements. You may attach additional information to
this form to clarify where your reasons or objections are addressed in the administrative record.)
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION: The appeal is limited to a review of the administrative record, the Corps
memorandum for the record of the appeal conference or meeting, and any supplemental information that the
review officer has determined is needed to clarify the administrative record. Neither the appellant nor the Corps
may add new information or analyses to the record. However, you may provide additional information to clarify
the location of information that is already in the administrative record.
POINT OF CONTACT FOR QUESTIONS OR INFORMATION:
If you have questions regarding this decision
If you only have questions regarding the appeal process you
and/or the appeal process you may contact:
may also contact:
Jamie Shern, Regulatory Specialist
Mr. Michael F. Bell, Administrative Appeal Review Officer
Raleigh Regulatory Field Office
CESAD-ET-CO-R
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, South Atlantic Division
[e-mail]
60 Forsyth Street, Room 9M15
919-554-4884, Ext. 31
1 Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8801
RIGHT OF ENTRY: Your signature below grants the right of entry to Corps of Engineers personnel, and any
government consultants, to conduct investigations of the project site during the course of the appeal process. You
will be provided a 15 day notice of any site investigation, and will have the opportunity to participate in all site
investigations.
Date:
Telephone number:
Signature of appellant or agent.
DIVISION ENGINEER:
Commander
U.S. Army Engineer Division, South Atlantic
60 Forsyth Street, Room 9M 15
Atlanta, Georgia 30303-3490

AN
L)&64 A
The City of Raleigh
Attn: Mr. Carl R. Dawson, Jr.
Public Works Department
PO Box 590
Raleigh, NC 27602-0590
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Alan W. Klimek, P.E. Director
RE C T•pIsp7EDuality
November 6, 2006
1 6 2006
Re: White Oak Lake Reconstruction/Reuse, Raleigh/Wake County
DWQ #20061565; USACE Action ID. No. 200420766
APPROVAL of 401 Water Quality Certification
Dear Mr. Dawson, Jr.:
Attached hereto is a copy of Certification No. 3594 issued to The City of Raleigh, dated November 3,
2006. In addition, you should get any other federal, state or local permits before you go ahead with your
project including (but not limited to) Solid Waste, Sediment and Erosion Control, Stormwater, Dam
Safety, Non -discharge and Water Supply Watershed regulations. .
If we can be of further assistance, do not hesitate to contact us.
Uz
Alan W. Klimek, P.E.
AWK/cbklasc
Attachments: Certificate of Completion
cc: Becky Fox, EPA, 1307 Firefly Road, Whittier, NC 28789
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Asheville Field Office,.Wilmington District, USACOE
Eric Kulz, DWQ Raleigh Regional Office
DLR Raleigh Regional Office
File Copy
Central Files
Amit Sachan, EI; Dewberry & Davis, Inc.; 2301 Rexwoods Dr; Raleigh, NC 27607
01 OversighNE)Vem Review Pemrits Unit
650 Mai Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 276994650
321 Crabtree. Boulevard, Suite 250, Raleigh, North Csmllna 27604
hone: 9194334786 / FAX [phone]Internet htto'//h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands
n Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer— 50% Recydedl10% Post Consumer Paper
Filename•. 061565 WhiteOakLakeReconstruction(Wake)101 IC

The City of Raleigh
Page 2 of 5
November 6, 2006
NORTH CAROLINA 401 WATER QUALITY CERTIFICATION
THIS CERTIFICATION is issued in conformity with the requirements of Section 401 Public Laws 92-
500 and 95-217 of the United States and subject to the North Carolina Division of Water Quality (DWQ)
Regulations in 15 NCAC 2H, Section .0500 to Mr. Carl R. Dawson, Jr. and the City of Raleigh to
temporarily fill 0.633 acres of jurisdictional wetlands, permanently fill 0.308 acres of jurisdictional
wetlands, 6.7 acres of open waters, 4601inear feet of perennial stream, 36,000 square feet of Zone 1
protected riparian buffer, and 25,200 square feet of Zone 2 protected riparian buffer in the Neuse River
Basin, associated with the reconstruction of White Oak Lake located on the west side of US Interstate 440,
south of Melbourne Road in the City of Raleigh in Wake County, pursuant to an application filed on the
j4th day of June of 2605, and received, by the DWQ on October 16, 2006.
The application and supporting documentation provides adequate assurance that the proposed work will
not result in a violation of applicable Water Quality Standards and discharge guidelines. Therefore, the
State of North Carolina certifies that this activity will not violate the applicable portions of Sections 301,
302, 303, 306, 307 of PL 92-500 and PL 95 -217 -if conducted in accordance with the application, the
supporting documentation, and conditions hereinafter set forth.
This approval is only valid for the purpose and design submitted in the application materials and as
described in the Public Notice. If the project is changed, prior to notification a new application for a new
Certification is required. If the property is sold, the new owner must be given a copy of the Certification
and approval letter and is thereby responsible for complying with all conditions of this Certification. Any
new owner must notify the Division and request the Certification be issued in their name. Should wetland
or stream fill be requested in the future, additional compensatory mitigation may be required as described
in 15A NCAC 2H.0506 (h) (6) and (7). If any plan revisions from the approved site plan result in a
change in stream or wetland impact or an increase in impervious surfaces, the DWQ shall be notified in
writing and a new application for 401 Certification may be required. For this approval to be valid,
compliance with the conditions listed below is required.
Conditions of Certification:
1. Impacts Approved
The following impacts are hereby approved as long as all of the other specific and general
conditions of this Certification (or Isolated Wetland Permit) are met. No other impacts are
approved including incidental impacts:
Amount Approved
nits
Reference
Stream
460 (linear feet)
Project Narrative and Construction Plans
404/CAMA Wetlands
(Temporary Impacts)
0.633 (acres)
Project Narrative and Construction Plans
404/CAMA Wetlands
(Permanent Impacts)
0.308 (acres)
Project Narrative and Construction Plans
Open Waters
6.7 (acres)
Project Narrative and Construction Plans
Zone 1 Buffers
36,000 (square feet)
Project Narrative and Construction Plans
Zone 2 Buffers
25,200 (square feet)
Project Narrative and Construction Plans

u.v vaa� va a�asa�.ir,i
Page 3 of 5
November 6, 2006
Sediment and Erosion Control:
2. Erosion and sediment control practices must be in full compliance with all specifications governing
the proper design, installation and operation and maintenance of such Best Management Practices in
order to protect surface waters standards:
a. The erosion and sediment control measures for the project must be designed, installed, operated,
and maintained in accordance with the most recent version of the North Carolina Sediment and
Erosion Control Planning and Design Manual.
b. The design, installation, operation, and maintenance of the sediment and erosion control measures
must be such that they equal, or exceed, the requirements specified in the most recent version of
the North Carolina Sediment and Erosion Control Manual. The devices shall be maintained on
all construction sites, borrow sites, and waste pile (spoil) projects, including contractor -owned or
leased borrow pits associated with the project.
c. Sufficient materials required for stabilization and/or repair of erosion control measures and
stormwater routing and treatment shall be on site at all times.
3. No waste, spoil, solids, or fill of any kind shall occur in wetlands, waters, or riparian areas beyond the
footprint of the impacts depicted in the 404/401 Permit Application. All construction activities,
including the design, installation, operation, and maintenance of sediment and erosion control Best
Management Practices, shall be performed so that no violations of state water quality standards,
statutes, or rules occur;
4. Sediment and erosion control measures shall not be placed in wetlands or waters to the maximum extent
practicable. If placement of sediment and erosion control devices in wetlands and waters is
unavoidable, they shall be removed and the natural grade restored within six months of the date that the
Division of Land Resources has released the project;
5. Protective Fencing - The outside buffer, wetland or water boundary and along the construction corridor
within these boundaries approved under this authorization shall be clearly marked with orange warning
fencing (or similar high visibility material) for the areas that have been approved to infringe within the
buffer, wetland or water prior to any land disturbing activities to ensure compliance with 15A NCAC
2B .0233 and GC 3404;
6. No Impacts Beyond those in Application
No waste, spoil, solids, or fill of any kind shall occur in wetlands, waters, or riparian areas beyond the
footprint of the impacts depicted in the Pre -construction Notification. All construction activities,
including the design, installation, operation, and maintenance of sediment and erosion control Best
Management Practices, shall be performed so that no violations of state water quality standards,
statutes, or rules occur.
Continuing Compliance:
7. Mr. Carl R. Dawson, Jr. and the City of Raleigh, shall conduct construction activities in a manner
consistent with State water quality standards (including any requirements resulting from compliance
with section 303(d) of the Clean Water Act) and any other appropriate requirements of State law and
federal law. If the Division determines that such standards or laws are not being met (including the
failure to sustain a designated or achieved use) or that State or federal law is being violated, or that
further conditions are necessary to assure compliance, the Division may reevaluate and modify this
Certification to include conditions appropriate to assure compliance with such standards.and ... =
requirements in accordance with 15A NCAC 2H.0507(d). Before modifying the Certification, the
Division stiall'nofify Mr: Carl R: Dawson, Jr' and the City of Raleigli'and'tlie US Ariuy Corps -of = +
:i

The City of Raleigh
Page 4 of 5
November 6, 2006
Engineers, provide public notice in accordance with 15A NCAC 2H.0503 and provide opportunity for
public hearing in accordance with 15A NCAC 2H.0504. Any new or revised conditions shall be
provided to Mr. Carl R. Dawson, Jr. and the City of Raleigh in writing, shall be provided to the
United States Army Corps of Engineers for reference in any Permit issued pursuant to Section 404 of
the Clean Water Act, and shall also become conditions of the 404 Permit for the project;
Deed Notifications:
8. Deed notifications or similar mechanisms shall be placed on all lots with remaining jurisdictional
wetlands and waters or areas within 50 feet of all streams and ponds, and any associated buffers.
These mechanisms shall be put in place within 30 days of the date of issuance of the 401 Certification
letter or the issuance of the 404 Permit (whichever is later). A sample deed notification format can be
downloaded from the 401/Wetlands Unit web site at http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands. DWQ shall
be sent copies of all deed restrictions applied to these lots;
9. Construction Stormwater Permit NCGO10000
Upon the approval of an Erosion and Sedimentation Control Plan issued by the Division of Land
Resources (DLR) or a DLR delegated local erosion and sedimentation control program, an NPDES
General stormwater permit (NCGO10000) administered by DWQ is automatically issued to the
project.- This General Permit allows stormwater to be discharged during land disturbing construction
activities as stipulated by conditions in the permit. If your project is covered by this permit
[applicable to construction projects that disturb one (1) or more acres], full compliance with permit
conditions including the sedimentation control plan, self-monitoring, record keeping and reporting
requirements are required. A copy of this permit and monitoring report forms may be found at
hM2.-Ilh2o.enr.state.nc.us/su/Forms Documents.htm.;
10. Adequate sediment and erosion control' measures must be used before construction and maintained
until disturbed soils are permanently stabilized. All bare soils must be seeded within fifteen (15) days
of ground disturbing activities. Erosion control matting must be used with seeding on disturbed soils
in riparian areas. It should be secured in place with staples, stakes, or, wherever possible, live stakes
of native trees. Straw mulch and tall fescue should not be used in riparian areas.
11. If concrete is used during construction (e.g., headwalls), it must be isolated from flowing water.
Water that inadvertently contacts live concrete must not reach surface waters since this can kill fish.
12. Raaelt„ sand, or other materials must not be excavated from the stream channels except in the
immediate vicinity of the culverts. Instream dredging has severe, adverse effects on aquatic life and
disturbance of the natural form of the channels can cause erosion. The natural dimension, pattern,
and profile of the channels adjoining the permitted areas should not be modified by widening or
changing their depths.
13. Saes, flexible pipe, or other stable diversion structures should be used to avoid excavation in
flowing wain. Materials used for flow diversions should be removed from the stream bed after
completing the construction work. Any diversion channels must be lined with fabric and/or rock.
14. Stormwater from roads should be directed to vegetated buffer areas (e.g. level spreaders) or retention
basins and not routed directly to streams as concentrated flow. -Drop inlets are not allowed directly on
streams. .y, .. ..2 �'�,r �r r iJ� :...i^c Y.[: �•:t .f .'7�.r T.., tL-. ..
_i 151%J J::F' `2� .'' ii+Qt" a i! �i� :r;t -i f,. :• -�'.' {J1 i: iiL'. s_::�:
15. Anyrockf;foinlet9r,,trtlet-stabilization should be clean and. limited to the stream bank below the
high water mark and vegetation should be used above. Rock or other materials must not be placed in
stream channels in a manner that obstructs fish passage.

Page 5 of 5
November 6, 2006
16. Riparian vegetation, especially trees and shrubs, should be preserved as much as possible. Where it is
removed, native woody vegetation (e.g., rhododendron, dog hobble, silky dogwood, sycamore, river
birch, red maple) should be replanted upstream and downstream of the culverts to provide bank
stability and shading. We encourage the use of native plants that must be removed from permanently
disturbed areas;
17. All mechanized equipment operated near surface waters should be inspected and maintained regularly
to prevent contamination of stream waters from fuels, lubricants, and hydraulic fluids;
18. Hydroseed mixtures and wash -waters must not reach surface waters;
19. For each phase of the project, before any impacts to streams or wetlands occur, all proposed stream
buffers must be established and protected by permanent conservation easements for all streams
encompassed by that phase;
20. Certificate of Completion
Upon completion of all work approved within the 441 Water Quality Certification or applicable
Buffer Rules, and any subsequent modifications, the applicant is required to return the attached
certificate of completion to the 401 Oversight/Express Review Permitting Unit, North Carolina
Division of Water Quality, 1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC, 27699-1650.
Also, this approval to proceed with your proposed impacts or to conduct impacts to waters as
depicted in your application shall expire upon expiration of the 404 or CAMA Permit.
If this Certification is unacceptable to you, you have the right to an adjudicatory hearing upon written
request within sixty (60) days following receipt of this Certification. This request must be in the form of a
written petition conforming to Chapter 150B of the North Carolina General Statutes and filed with the
Office of Administrative .Hearings, 6714 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, N.C. 27699-6714. If
modifications are made to an original Certification, you have the right to an adjudicatory hearing on the
modifications upon written request within sixty (60) days following receipt of the Certification. Unless
such demands are made, this Certification shall be final and binding.
This the 3rd day of Novqmber 2006
DIVISIONF � QUALITY
Alan W. Klimek, P.E.
3594
AWKIcbk/asc

t,ertl icailon U1 t.uiliplumu"
DWQ Project No.:
Applicant:
Project Name:
Date of Issuance of Wetland Permit:
County:
Certificate of Com Ietion
Upon completion of all work approved within the 401 Water Quality Certification and Buffer Rules, and an
subsequent modifications, the applicant is required to return this certificate to the 401 Oversight/Express Permitting Uni
North Carolina Division of Water Quality, 1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC, 27699-1650. This form may b
returned to DWQ by the applicant, the applicant's authorized agent, or the project engineer. It is not necessary to sen,
certificates from all of these.
Applicant's Certification
I, , hereby state that, to the best of my abilities, due care and diligence w&
used in the observation of the construction such that the construction was observed to be built within substantial
compliance and intent of the 401 Water Quality Certification and Buffer Rules, the approved plans and specifications,
and other supporting materials.
Signature: Date:
Agent's Certification
I 'hereby state that, to the best of my abilities, due care and diligence was
used in the observation of the construction such that the, construction was observed to be built within substantial
compliance and intent of the 401 Water Quality Certification and Buffer Rules, the approved plans and specifications,
and other supporting materials.
Signature:
Date:
If this project was designed by a Certified Professional
I, as a duly registered Professional (i.e., Engineer,
Landscape Architect, Surveyor, etc.) in the State of North Carolina, having been authorized to observe (periodically,
weekly, full time) the construction of the project, for the Permittee hereby state that, to the best of my abilities, due care
and diligence was used in the observation of the construction such -that the construction was observed to be built within
substantial compliance and intent of the 401 Water Quality Certification and Buffer Rules, the approved plans and
specifications, and other supporting materials.
Signature: Registration No.
Date

PROJECT LOCATION
676
#200420766
ke Couny, NC
.tyofR1egh
eptember 2, 2005
22 West HargettStretf
4eet I 0f7
N _7
..........
Ft
:Do C! map *Alit pack
WGS84
7 -
Location
Scale 1 400,000 TY4
6 zni
gz—

°'�..� �► j; -------__ Site Plan
M---_____�_ City of Raleigh
-
ELBOURNERp White Oak Lake Reconstruction/Reuse
r='�• �,� t _ - _ - - _ _ __ 1 inch = 150 feet
rr:
1,
.,� I- s:,.�`• :.r xt tin
g
iywiaStep
egendoudla d�St[eam 1: Steppo
Stormwater Conv
A;.b p `t.. �. ♦♦ � Re -� is eyan e s
c
Tt 9n s seam orebay �:1
` ali into f
..N.a�„r�� tri �.) � ••♦� 1 3 O
W14 a.
} x [ora6�y:_ + ♦'�•�• Exist ng. ;tersurfalebqundary � C
%HAIiVKSBUR. Lq_ (`� 0
' � t- -,- - - - - • I, 1, �--_...1
� � •� t -.� - - -- - - - - - :. lam►
rt! ` ♦ Reconst ct •isting..
r .a, rn
,. ♦ E e[genc Spillway
�f
a_
j 0 6. ,a .S.filling Basin
00
O 4. 20' wishelf (0.2' et:d$pt�t) % ` J � t, Stream 2:
(, ♦ Channel Stabiliza
0 / �l
Q't
Exis i g dam
Realign dam parairel•to 1-440
�• 'A O , - Raise dam crest to ElevatloR.4D�
~ 't

co
70
c m
n c
o co
m �
c
c
ca
O
CL
`" o �O O �- Y O Co
O o
n- C C LL O - J m
v () � c
cca o` o` v M " 0 �
_c o a) o
C LD
Q m of co co 3
(D I
r ofRilagh' ?i:
West HargeCt•Street
eight NC V461.
rl
rol
N
--_ao oobM^=T
Abo
-72
c
Ger
I

CD
►� rn A
p \\ O
z
V
L
Boundary
ajor.,Contours
Mtno'r Contours
Building Footprint
.Ro d�ROW
"�'Storiwater Conveyance
� J.�tryam,lake
— :,►. d Boundary
0 '0,100 Feet
YN
—ft.
iiteYl - Lake J
A. . .-.. .
N
A

I IYIPI'l
P

Legend
--- Adjacent Property Boundary
Foreba y
Major Contours
a y,H •
�� '• Normal Pool
-'-- Minor Contours
Proposed Dam
_T
Building Footprint
Road ROW
Proposed Stream
- Step Pools
-"" - Stormwater Conveyance
Littoral Shelf
'- Wetland Boundary
Wetland/Stream impacts
®Zone 2 Buffers
00 °� Streams
ED x Wetlands N
0 50 100 Feet
o ry

SECTION G - PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION
REQUEST & REVISED WETLAND EXHIBIT

�•� Dewberry
X641,
g0�
Preliminary Jurisdictional
Determination Request
White Oak Lake Reconstruction Project
Wake County, NC
July 24, 2017
Submitted To:
Ms. Tasha Alexander
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Raleigh Regulatory Field Office
3331 Heritage Trade Drive
Suite 105
Wake Forest, NC 27587
Submitted By:
Dewberry Engineers Inc.
551 Piney Forest Road
Danville, Virginia 24540
434-797-4497

'' Dewberry
y�r
July 24, 2017
United States Army Corps of Engineers
ATTN: Tasha Alexander
Raleigh Regulatory Field Office
3331 Heritage Trade Drive, Suite 105
Wake Forest, North Carolina 27587
Dewberry Engineers Inc. 1 434.797.4497
551 Piney Forest Road 434.797.4341 fax
Danville, VA 24540 www.dewberry.com
RE: Request for a Jurisdictional Wetland Delineation Confirmation
White Oak Lake Reconstruction Project
Dear Ms. Alexander:
On May 30, 2017, Dewberry Engineers Inc. (Dewberry) conducted a wetland and Waters of the U.S.
(WOUS) investigation within an approximate thirteen (13) acres project area related to the White Oak Lake
Reconstruction Project. The project area is located on the west side of U.S. Interstate 440, south of
Melbourne Road within the City of Raleigh, Wake County, North Carolina. Coordinates for the site are:
35.776oN,-78.715oW. The lake is on Simmons Branch in the Neuse River Basin (Hydrologic Unit Code
03020201).
The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) Wilmington District Jurisdictional Determination Request
packet with the required supporting documentation is enclosed with this letter as Appendix A.
DELINEATION FINDINGS
The methods used to identify jurisdictional waters of the U.S. (WOUS), including wetlands, were those set
forth in the 1987 USACE Wetland Delineation Manual (Y -87-I) and the Regional Supplement to the Corps
of Engineers Wetland Delineation Manual: Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region (ERDC/EL TR -12-9).
Prior to the site visit, Dewberry conducted an online investigation of the property, reviewing federal and
state databases that provide information regarding the site characteristics of the subject property. During
the site visit, Dewberry traversed the project area identifying wetland and WOUS, collected and recorded
soil profiles, observed and recorded the vegetation and hydrology of each wetland type and field flagged
wetlands and WOUS.
The USGS Raleigh West, North Carolina 2016 quadrangle map was initially used to decipher information
on topography and stream channels prior to the site visit and is provided as Figure 2. The USGS
topographic map shows the site as consisting of undeveloped woodlands.
The Natural Resources Conservation Service, Web Soil Survey for Wake County was used as a resource to
assist with identifying and classifying soil types present at the site prior to the site visit and is included as
Figure 3. The digital Soil Survey Map labels the soil on-site within the project area as being:
• (CeD) Cecil sandy loam, 10-15% slopes
• (CmA) Chewacla sandy loam, 0-2% slopes
• (WoA) Wehadkee and Bibb soils, 0-2% slopes
Of the above listed soils, (CmA) Chewacla sandy loam, 0-2% slopes and (WoA) Wehadkee and Bibb soils,
0-2% slopes are considered a hydric soil in Wake County, North Carolina.
The National Wetland Inventory (NWI) map was generated from the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Wetland
Mapper and is provided as Figure 4. The NWI map was used prior to the site visit to help identify mapped
wetlands prior to the site visit. The online NWI map indicated that there are no wetlands on the subject
property, but did show the lake, stream channel on opposite ends and a stream flowing into the lake at
Page I of 2

Ms. Alexander
White Oak Lake Reconstruction Project
July 24, 2017
approximately the midpoint. The field delineation confirmed the presence of the lake and the inlet and
outlet stream channels, however the midline stream shown on the NWI map was not delineated as it had
been historically piped and no longer day lighted within the project site boundaries. Table 1 provides a
summary of the field delineation.
The delineated wetland was surveyed by a licensed surveyor and is shown on the wetland exhibit included
as Appendix B of this report. The wetland exhibit illustrates the location, type and amount of wetland,
and the location of data points. Field data sheets and stream determination forms are provided in
Appendix C. Photographs of the site are provided in Appendix D.
Table is Field Delineation Summary
Map ID
(Zone)
Classification
Description
Data
Point
Zone A
POW
Lake
Zone B
R3
Perennial Stream
Zone C
R4
Intermittent Stream
Zone D
PSS
Scrub -Shrub
DP -i
Zone E
R3
Perennial Stream
Zone AA
PEM
Emergent Wetland
DP -2
UPL-1
UPI,
Upland Area
UPL-i
Dewberry requests a USACE jurisdictional determination of the delineated areas described above. Please
contact me at your earliest convenience to set a date and time to meet at the site for confirmation. If you
have any questions or comments, please do not hesitate to contact me at [e-mail] or 434-
549-8525•
Sincerely,
Dewberry Engineers Inc.
Troy A. Shelton, PWD
Environmental Department Manager
Senior Environmental Scientist
TAS
Enclosures
P:\50079798\Adm\Reports\JD Request\PJD L.etter.docx
It Dewberry Page 2 of 2

Figure 1
Aerial Site Map

1
• •
AA
10
ti
owl
• .. r• 4
Wh
it
Project Area
•�� �• ? + a
44
t L'
a.
r r ,► a � ♦ l� � �,j ! •.b , i� ' r-- fit' � a 4, •`
r:�7 T

Figure 2
USGS Topographic Site Map

ca
Site Location
3S.776ON
-78.71SOW
s. Dewberry
450�
MELBOURNE RD
Ct
V
5 X-,wl
tip
LILES RD
)91A111
Figure 2: Topographic Project Area Map
White Oak Lake Reconstruction Project
Wake County, North Carolina
USGS Topographic Quadrangle Imagery: N
Raleigh West, NC 2016

Figure 3
NRCS Web Soil Survey

►a
Ag 2'A` B2
CeB2 ApD`
,r`
ApC_
Ce(
c.. r OcgC2/
poi v�
Lir`' CeB2
CeD .
age Dr,
CgC�
CnA
r
OPS _�--
UdD
s
�. c.['(� �'Tl!bl ;hnl . �7 r`,oT'i.•�„ C3� t,��5�`�lna �3C�YJOCap��
0
t Ge62
}iuntingdon,Dr '
CeB2,
WoA �a
t•
2 Ge62�'PJ CeB2
CeC2"
r
w % MeA
raF
x CeD
CeD 1
tmA
CgC2
Cg62
r'*agC2
/ ,CgB2 Q
1

MAP LEGEND
Area of Interest (AOI)
Area of Interest (AOI)
Solis
Soil Map Unit Polygons
Soil Map Unit Lines
0
Soil Map Unit Points
Special
Point Features
(>
Blowout
Borrow Pit
)(
Clay Spot
{�
Closed Depression
Gravel Pit
„
Gravelly Spot
Landfill
Lava Flow
Marsh or swamp
Mine or Quarry
Miscellaneous Water
0
Perennial Water
V
Rock Outcrop
+
Saline Spot
Sandy Spot
_
Severely Eroded Spot
Sinkhole
Slide or Slip
Sodic Spot
Custom Soil Resource Report
Spoil Area
Stony Spot
Very Stony Spot
Wet Spot
Other
.- Special Line Features
Water Features
Streams and Canals
Transportation
4-" Rails
,M,y Interstate Highways
US Routes
Major Roads
Local Roads
Background
N Aerial Photography
MAP INFORMATION
The soil surveys that comprise your AOI were mapped at
1:15,800.
Warning: Soil Map may not be valid at this scale.
Enlargement of maps beyond the scale of mapping can cause
misunderstanding of the detail of mapping and accuracy of soil
line placement. The maps do not show the small areas of
contrasting soils that could have been shown at a more detailed
scale.
Please rely on the bar scale on each map sheet for map
measurements.
Source of Map: Natural Resources Conservation Service
Web Soil Survey URL:
Coordinate System: Web Mercator (EPSG:3857)
Maps from the Web Soil Survey are based on the Web Mercator
projection, which preserves direction and shape but distorts
distance and area. A projection that preserves area, such as the
Albers equal-area conic projection, should be used if more
accurate calculations of distance or area are required.
This product is generated from the USDA-NRCS certified data as
of the version date(s) listed below.
Soil Survey Area: Wake County, North Carolina
Survey Area Data: Version 15, Sep 19, 2016.
Soil map units are labeled (as space allows) for map scales
1:50,000 or larger.
Date(s) aerial images were photographed: Data not available
The orthophoto or other base map on which the soil lines were
compiled and digitized probably differs from the background
imagery displayed on these maps. As a result, some minor
shifting of map unit boundaries may be evident.

Custom Soil Resource Report
Map Unit Legend
Wake County, North Carolina (NC183)
Map Unit Symbol
Map Unit Name
Acres in AOI
Percent of AOI
AgC2
Appling gravelly sandy loam, 6
0.1
0.0%
to 10 percent slopes,
moderately eroded
ApB2
Appling sandy loam, 2 to 6
2.9
1.2%
percent slopes, moderately
eroded
ApC2
Appling sandy loam, 6 to 10
12.0
5.2%
percent slopes, moderately
eroded
ApD
Appling sandy loam, 10 to 15
1.0
0.4%
percent slopes
CeB2
Cecil sandy loam, 2 to 6
73.8
31.9%
percent slopes, moderately
eroded
CeC2
Cecil sandy loam, 6 to 10
36.011
15.6%
percent slopes, moderately
eroded
CeD
Cecil sandy loam, 10 to 15
32.6
14.1%
percent slopes
Cg132
Cecil gravelly sandy loam, 2 to 10.7 4.6%
6 percent slopes, moderately
eroded
CgC2
Cecil gravelly sandy loam, 6 to 35.6 15.4%
10 percent slopes,
moderately eroded
CmA
Chewacla sandy loam, 0 to 2 9.0 3.9%
percent slopes, frequently
flooded
CnA
Colfax sandy loam, 0 to 3 1.9 0.8%
percent slopes
MeA
Mantachie sandy loam, 0 to 2 0.1 0.0%
percent slopes, rarely flooded
UdD
Udorthents loamy, 0 to 15 0.01 0.0%
percent slopes
W
Water 11.3
4.9%
WoA
Wehadkee and Bibb soils, 0 to 4.4
1.9%
2 percent slopes, frequently
flooded
Totals for Area of Interest 231.2
100.0%

Figure 4
NWI Map

National Wetlands Invento
White Oak Lake
June 15, 2017
Wetlands n
0 Estuarine and Marine Deepwater .
Estuarine and Marine Wetland
This map is for general reference only. The US Fish and Wildlife
Service is not responsible for the accuracy or currentness of the
base data shown on this map. All wetlands related data should
Freshwater Emergent Wetland Lake be used in accordance with the layer metadata found on the
Wetlands Mapper web site.
Freshwater Forested/Shrub Wetland ❑ Other
Freshwater Pond Riverine
National Wetlands Inventory (NWI)
This Daoe was Droduced by the NWI mapper

Appendix A
PJD Request Package

Jurisdictional Determination Request
U8 Army Corps
of Engineers
Mmrngton DIStnd
This form is intended for use by anyone requesting a jurisdictional determination (JD) from the
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Wilmington District (Corps). Please include all supporting
information, as described within each category, with your request. You may submit your request
to the appropriate Corps Field Office (or project manager, if known) via mail, electronic mail, or
facsimile. A current list of county assignments by Field Office and project manager can be
found on-line at: htttp•//www saw usace army mil/Missions/RegulatoryPermitProaram aspx , by
telephoning: 910-251-4633, or by contacting any of the field offices listed below:
ASHEVILLE REGULATORY FIELD OFFICE
US Army Corps of Engineers
151 Patton Avenue, Room 208
Asheville, North Carolina 28801-5006
General Number: [phone]
Fax Number: [phone]
RALEIGH REGULATORY FIELD OFFICE
US Army Corps of Engineers
3331 Heritage Trade Drive, Suite 105
Wake Forest, North Carolina 27587
General Number: [phone]
Fax Number: [phone]
WASHINGTON REGULATORY FIELD OFFICE
US Army Corps of Engineers
2407 West Fifth Street
Washington, North Carolina 27889
General Number: [phone]
Fax Number: [phone]
WILMINGTON REGULATORY FIELD OFFICE
US Army Corps of Engineers
69 Darlington Avenue
Wilmington, North Carolina 28403
General Number: 910-251-4633
Fax Number: [phone]
Version: December 2013 Page 1

Jurisdictional Determination Request
INSTRUCTIONS:
All requestors must complete Parts A, B, C, D, E and F.
NOTE TO CONSULTANTS AND AGENCIES: If you are requesting a JD on behalf of a
paying client or your agency, please note the specific submittal requirements in Part G.
NOTE ON PART D — PROPERTY OWNER AUTHORIZATION: Please be aware that all JD
requests must include the -current property owner authorization for the Corps to proceed with the
determination, which may include inspection of the property when necessary. This form must be
signed by the current property owner to be considered a complete request.
NOTE ON PART D - NCDOT REQUESTS: Property owner authorization/notification for JD
requests associated with North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT) projects will be
conducted according to the current NCDOT/USACE protocols.
NOTE TO USDA PROGRAM PARTICIPANTS: A Corps approved or preliminary JD may not
be valid for the wetland conservation provisions of the Food Security Act of 1985. If you or
your tenant are USDA Program participants, or anticipate participation in USDA programs, you
should also request a certified wetland determination from the local office of the Natural
Resources Conservation Service, prior to starting work.
Version: December 2013 Page 2

Jurisdictional Determination Request
A. PARCEL INFORMATION
Street Address:
City, State:
County:
Directions:
1001 Ravenwood Drive
Raleigh, NC
Wake
Take exit 1 D off Route 440 in Raleigh onto Melbourne Road and tum left onto
Ravenwood Drive, follow Ravenwood Drive to its terminus
Parcel Index Number(s) (PIN): 0783473763
B. REQUESTOR INFORMATION
Name: Troy Shelton, Dewberry Engineers Inc.
Mailing Address: 551 Piney Forest Road, Danville, VA 24540
Telephone Number: 434-549-8525
Electronic Mail Address': [e-mail]
Select one:
❑ I am the current property owner.
0 I am an Authorized Agent or Environmental Consultant2
❑ Interested Buyer or Under Contract to Purchase
❑ Other, please explain.
C. PROPERTY OWNER INFORMATION
Name:
Mailing Address:
Telephone Number:
Electronic Mail Address3:
❑✓ Proof of Ownership Attached (e.g. a copy of Deed, County GIS/Parcei/Tax Record data)
1 If available
Z Must attach completed Agent Authorization Form
3 If available
Version: December 2013 Page 3

SAW JD_Request_12-2013_ 1L.. 4 / 11 A x
jurisdictional Determination Request
D. PROPERTY OWNER CERTIFICATION
I, the undersigned, a duly authorized owner of record of the property/properties identified h
do authorize representatives of the Wilmington District, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (Co
to enter upon the property herein described for the purpose of conducting on-site investigati
and issuing a determination associated with Waters of the U.S. subject to Federal jurisdictic
under Section 404 of the Clean Water Act and/or Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act
1899.
k� �
r%r�
i r r ! d V%4, *,eVe it S
Property Owner (please p Date
Owner Signature
E. JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION TYPE
Select One:
I am requesting that the Corps provide a preliminary JD for the property identified b
This request does include a delineation.
I am requesting that the Corps provide a preliminary JD for the property identified b
This request does NOT include a delineation.
I am requesting that the Corps investigate the property/project area for the presence
absence of WoUS5 and provide an approved JD for the property identified herein. T
request does NOT include a request for a verified delineation.
I am requesting that the Corps delineate the boundaries of all WoUS on a property/p
area and provide an approved JD (this may or may not include a survey plat).
I am requesting that the Corps evaluate and approve a delineation of WoUS (conduc
hir 0%A&Snal nn o oroo o"A Qn annr1%%,1VA 1rl frnwu nr moi? not

F.
R
91
17
Jurisdictional Determination Request
ALL REQUESTS
Map of Property or Project Area (attached). This Map must clearly depict the boundaries
of the area of evaluation.
Size of Property or Project Area t13
acres
I verify that the property (or project) boundaries have recently been surveyed and marked
by a licensed land surveyor QR are otherwise clearly marked or distinguishable.
JD REQUESTS FROM CONSULTANTS OR AGENCIES
(1) Preliminary JD Requests:
✓❑ Completed and signed Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination Form6.
✓0
Project Coordinates: 35.7760N
Latitude -78.7150W
Longitude
Maps (no larger than 11 x 17) with Project Boundary Overlay:
0✓ Large and small scale maps that depict, at minimum: streets, intersections, towns
❑✓ Aerial Photography of the project area
❑✓ USGS Topographic Map
✓❑ Soil Survey Map
ROther Maps, as appropriate (e.g. National Wetland Inventory Map, Proposed Site
Plan, previous delineation maps, LIDAR maps, FEMA floodplain maps)
6 See Appendix A of this Form. From Regulatory Guidance Letter No. 08-02, dated June 26, 2008
Version: December 2013 Page 5

Jurisdictional Determination Request
Delineation Information (when applicable):
Wetlands:
7 Wetland Data Sheets$
Tributaries:
❑ USACE Assessment Forms
❑✓ Upland Data Sheets ✓❑ Other Assessment Forms
(when appropriate)
❑ Landscape Photos, if taken
W] Field Sketch overlain on legible Map that includes:
■ All aquatic resources (for sites with multiple resources, label and identify)
■ Locations of wetland data points and/or tributary assessment reaches
■ Locations of photo stations
■ Approximate acreage/linear footage of aquatic resources
(2) Approved JDs including Verification of a Delineation:
❑ Project Coordinates:
Latitude
Longitude
Maps (no larger than 11x17) with Project Boundary Overlay:
❑ Large and small scale maps that depict, at minimum: streets, intersections, towns
❑ Aerial Photography of the project area
❑ USGS Topographic Map
❑ Soil Survey Map
❑ Other Maps, as appropriate (e.g. National Wetland Inventory Map, Proposed Site Plan,
previous delineation maps)
1987 Manual Regional Supplements and Data forms can be found at:
http://www.usacearmy.mil/Missions/CivilWorks/ReizulatoryProgramandPermits/rea supp.aspx
Wetland and Stream Assessment Methodologies can be found at:
http://portal.ncdenr.orv./c/document library/get file?uuid=76f3c58b-dab8-4960-ba43-45b7faf06f4c&aroupld=38364 and,
http://www.s w.usace.army.miVPortaIs/59/docs/reszulatoryloubIicnotices/2013/NCSAM Draft User Manual 1303 318.pdf
8 Delineation information must include, at minimum, one wetland data sheet for each wetland/community type.
Version: December 2013 Page 6

Jurisdictional Determination Request
Delineation Information (when applicable):
Wetlands:
❑ Wetland Data Sheets9
Tributaries:
❑ USACE Assessment Forms
❑ Upland Data Sheets ❑ Other Assessment Forms
(when appropriate)
❑ Landscape Photos, if taken
❑ Field Sketch overlain on legible Map that includes:
• All aquatic resources (for sites with multiple resources, label and identify)
• Locations of wetland data points and/or tributary assessment reaches
• Locations of photo stations
• Approximate acreage/linear footage of aquatic resources
Supporting Jurisdictional Information (for Approved JDs only)
❑ Approved Jurisdictional Determination Form(s) (also known as "Rapanos
Form(s)")
❑ Map(s) depicting the potential (or lack of potential) hydrologic connection(s),
adjacency, etc. to navigable waters.
9 Delineation information must include, at minimum, one wetland data sheet for each wetland/community type.
Version: December 2013 Page 7

jurisdictional Determination Request
I. REQUESTS FOR CORPS APPROVAL OF SURVEY PLAT
Prior to final production of a Plat, the Wilmington District recommends that the Land
Surveyor electronically submit a draft of a Survey Plat to the Corps project manager for
review.
Due to storage limitations of our administrative records, the Corps requires that all hard-
copy submittals include at least one original Plat (to scale) that is no larger than 1 l"x17"
(the use of match lines for larger tracts acceptable). Additional copies of a plat, including
those larger than I 1 "x 17", may also be submitted for Corps signature as needed. The
Corps also accepts electronic submittals of plats, such as those transmitted as a Portable
Document Format (PDF) file. Upon verification, the Corps can electronically sign these
plats and return them via e-mail to the requestor.
(1) PLATS SUBMITTED FOR APPROVAL
Must be sealed and signed by a licensed professional land surveyor
Must be to scale (all maps must include both a graphic scale and a verbal scale)
Must be legible
RMust include a North Arrow, Scale(s), Title, Property Information
Must include a legible WoUS Delineation Table of distances and bearings/metes
and bounds/GPS coordinates of all surveyed delineation points
RMust clearly depict surveyed property or project boundaries
Must clearly identify the known surveyed point(s) used as reference (e.g. property
corner, USGS monument)
F1When wetlands are depicted:
• Must include acreage (or square footage) of wetland polygons
• Must identify each wetland polygon using an alphanumeric system
Version: December 2013 Page 8

jurisdictional Determination Request
❑ When tributaries are depicted:
• Must include either a surveyed, approximate centerline of tributary with
approximate width of tributary OR surveyed Ordinary High Water Marks
(OHWM) of tributary
• Must identify each tributary using an alphanumeric system
• Must include linear footage of tributaries and calculated area (using approximate
widths or surveyed OHWM)
• Must include name of tributary (based on the most recent USGS topographic
map) or, when no USGS name exists, identify as "unnamed tributary"
F] all depicted WoUS (wetland polygons and tributary lines) must intersect or tie -to
surveyed project/property boundaries
Must include the location of wetland data points and/or tributary assessment
reaches
Must include, label accordingly, and depict acreage of all waters not currently
subject to the requirements of the CWA (e.g. "isolated wetlands", "non -
jurisdictional waters"). NOTE: An approved JD must be conducted in order to
make an official Corps determination that a particular waterbody or wetland is not
jurisdictional.
F] Must include and survey all existing conveyances (pipes, culverts, etc.) that
transport WoUS
Version: December 2013 Page 9

jurisdictional Determination Request
(2) CERTIFICATION LANGUAGE
F]When the entire actual Jurisdictional Boundga is depicted:
include the following Corps Certification language:
'This certifies that this copy of this plat accurately depicts the boundary of the jurisdiction
of Section 404 of the Clean Water Act as determined by the undersigned on this date.
Unless there is a change in the law or our published regulations, the determination of
Section 404 jurisdiction may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five (5) years from
this date. The undersigned completed this determination utilizing the appropriate Regional
Supplement to the 1987 U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual."
Regulatory Official:
Title:
Date:
USACE Action ID No.:
When uplands may be present within a depicted Jurisdictional Boundary:
include the following Corps Certification language:
"This certifies that this copy of this plat identifies all areas of waters of the United States
regulated pursuant to Section 404 of the Clean Water Act as determined by the
undersigned on this date. Unless there is change in the law or our published regulations,
this determination of Section 404 jurisdiction may be relied upon for a period not to exceed
five years from this date. The undersigned completed this determination utilizing the
appropriate Regional Supplement to the 1987 U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Wetlands
Delineation Manual."
Regulatory Oficial:
Title:
Date:
USACE Action ID No.:
Version: December 2013 Page 10

Jurisdictional Determination Request
(3) GPS SURVEYS
For Surveys prepared using a Global Positioning System (GPS), the Survey must include
all of the above, as well as:
EIbe at sub -meter accuracy at each survey point.
include an accuracy verification:
One or more known points (property corner, monument) shall be located with the
GPS and cross-referenced with the existing traditional property survey (metes and
bounds).
include a brief description of the GPS equipment utilized.
Version: December 2013 Page 11

Appendix 2 - PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION (PJD) FORM
A. REPORT COMPLETION DATE FOR PJD:
B. NAME AND ADDRESS OF PERSON REQUESTING PJD: Troy A. Shelton, 551 Piney Forest Road, Danville, VA 24E
C. DISTRICT OFFICE, FILE NAME, AND NUMBER: Raleigh Field Office
D. PROJECT LOCATION(S) AND BACKGROUND INFORMATION:
(USE THE TABLE BELOW TO DOCUMENT MULTIPLE AQUATIC RESOURCES AND/OR
AQUATIC RESOURCES AT DIFFERENT SITES)
State: NC County/parish/borough: Wake City: Raleigh
Center coordinates of site (iattlong in degree decimal format):
Lat.: 35.7760N
Long.: -78.7150W
Universal Transverse Mercator 17S 706539.91 mE, 3961512.53mN
Name of nearest waterbody: White Oak Lake
E. REVIEW PERFORMED FOR SITE EVALUATION (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY):
❑ Office (Desk) Determination. Date:
❑ Field Determination. Date(s):
TABLE OF AQUATIC RESOURCES IN REVIEW AREA WHICH "MAY BE" SUBJECT TO REGULATORY
JURISDICTION.
Site
number
Latitude
(decimal
degrees)
Longitude
(decimal
degrees)
Estimated amount
of aquatic resource
in review area
(acreage and linear
feet, if applicable)
Type of aquatic
resource (i.e., wetland
vs. non -wetland
waters)
Geographic authority
to which the aquatic
resource "may be
subject (i.e., Section
404 or Section 10/404)
i

1) The Corps of Engineers believes that there may be jurisdictional aquatic resources in
the review area, and the requestor of this PJD is hereby advised of his or her option
to request and obtain an approved JD (AJD) for that review area based on an
informed decision after having discussed the various types of JDs and their
characteristics and circumstances when they may be appropriate.
2) In any circumstance where a permit applicant obtains an individual permit, or a
Nationwide General Permit (NWP) or other general permit verification requiring "pre -
construction notification" (PCN), or requests verification for a non -reporting NWP or
other general permit, and the permit applicant has not requested an AJD for the
activity, the permit applicant is hereby made aware that: (1) the permit applicant has
elected to seek a permit authorization based on a PJD, which does not make an
official determination of jurisdictional aquatic resources; (2) the applicant has the
option to request an AJD before accepting the terms and conditions of the permit
authorization, and that basing a permit authorization on an AJD could possibly result
in less compensatory mitigation being required or different special conditions; (3) the
applicant has the right to request an individual permit rather than accepting the terms
and conditions of the NWP or other general permit authorization; (4) the applicant can
accept a permit authorization and thereby agree to comply with all the terms and
conditions of that permit, including whatever mitigation requirements the Corps has
determined to be necessary; (5) undertaking any activity in reliance upon the subject
permit authorization without requesting an AJD constitutes the applicant's acceptance
of the use of the PJD; (6) accepting a permit authorization (e.g., signing a proffered
individual permit) or undertaking any activity in reliance on any form of Corps permit
authorization based on a PJD constitutes agreement that all aquatic resources in the
review area affected in any way by that activity will be treated as jurisdictional, and
waives any challenge to such jurisdiction in any administrative or judicial compliance
or enforcement action, or in any administrative appeal or in any Federal court; and (7)
whether the applicant elects to use either an AJD or a PJD, the JD will be processed
as soon as practicable. Further, an AJD, a proffered individual permit (and all terms
and conditions contained therein), or individual permit denial can be administratively
appealed pursuant to 33 C.F.R. Part 331. If, during an administrative appeal, it
becomes appropriate to make an official determination whether geographic
jurisdiction exists over aquatic resources in the review area, or to provide an official
delineation of jurisdictional aquatic resources in the review area, the Corps will
provide an AJD to accomplish that result, as soon as is practicable. This PJD finds
that there "may be" waters of the U.S. and/or that there "may be, navigable waters of
the U.S. on the subject review area, and identifies all aquatic features in the review
area that could be affected by the proposed activity, based on the following
information:

SUPPORTING DATA. Data reviewed for PJD (check all that apply)
Checked items should be included in subject file. Appropriately reference sources
below where indicated for all checked items:
© Maps, plans, plots or plat submitted by or on behalf of the PJD requestor.
Map: Dewberry
on Data sheets prepared/submitted by or on behalf of the PJD requester.
❑ Office concurs with data sheets/delineation report.
❑ Office does not concur with data sheets/delineation report. Rationale:
❑ Data sheets prepared by the Corps:
❑ Corps navigable waters' study:
❑ U.S. Geological Survey Hydrologic Atlas:
❑ USGS NHD data.
❑ USGS 8 and 12 digit HUC maps.
M U.S. Geological Survey map(s). Cite scale & quad name: 1:24,000, Raleigh West, NC 2016
8 Natural Resources Conservation Service Soil Survey. Citation: USDA Web Soil Survey
0 National wetlands inventory map(s). Cite name: USFWS, NWI
❑ Statellocal wetland inventory map(s):
❑ FEMA/FIRM maps:
❑ 100 -year Floodplain Elevation is: .(National Geodetic Vertical Datum of 1929
Photographs: Q Aerial (Name & Date): USGS Topographic Quadrangle Imagery, 2016
or Other (Name & Date): Dewberry Site Photographs, 2017.5.30
❑ Previous determination(s). File no. and date of response letter:
❑■ Other information (please specify): Previous Action ID: 200420766
detenninations.
Signature and date of
Regulatory staff member
completing PJD
Signature and date of
person requesting PJD
(REQUIRED, unless obtaining
the signature is impracticable)'
Districts may establish timeframes for requestor to return signed PJD forms. If the requestor does not respond
within the established time frame, the district may presume concurrence and no additional follow up is
necessary prior to finalizing an action.

Appendix B
Wetland Exhibit

�.
�■�..�.
��m'
��

Appendix C
USACE Field Data Sheets

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Eastern Mountains and Piedmont
Project/Site: White Oak Lake Reconstruction Project City/County: Wake County Date: 5/30/2017
Applicant/Owner: City of Raleigh State: NC Sampling Point: DP -1
Section, Township,
Investigator(s): T.shelton/1.Rathburn Range: Raleigh
Landform (hilislope, terrace, Local relief (c o",
etc.): depression Co X,nme): concave Slope (%): 10%
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): MLRA 136 of LRR P Lat: 35'46'31" Long: 78"42'49" Datum:
Soil Map Unit Name: Cecil sandy loam, 10-15% slopes NWI Classification: PSS
Are climate/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of the year?
Are vegetation _ , soil _ , or hydrology significantly disturbed?
Are vegetation soil or hydrology natrually problematic?
Yes X No (If no, explain in Remarks)
Are "Normal Circumstances" present?) Yes X No
(If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
Summary of Findings - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc
Hydrophytic Vegetation present? Yes X No
Hydric Soil present? Yes X No Is the Sampled Area within a Wetland? Yes X No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
Remarks:
Hydrology
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply)
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
X Surface Water (Al)
True Aquatic Plants (1314)
Surface Soil Cracks (86)
X High Water Table (A2)
Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
Saturation (A3)
Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (0)
Drainage Patterns (BSO)
_ Water Marks (81)
Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
_Moss Trim Lines (1316)
_Sediment Deposits (132)
Thin Muck Surface (0)
Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
_ Drift Deposits (83)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
_Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_Algal Mat or Crust (B4)
_Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_ Iron Deposits (85)
_Stunted or Stressed Plants (D3)
_ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
_Geomorphic Position (D2)
_ Water -Stained Leaves (89)
_ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
_Aquatic Fauna (813)
_Microtopographic Relief (D4)
FAC -Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes X No Depth (Inches): <1
Water Table Present? Yes X No Depth (Inches): 2 Wetland Hydrology Present?
Saturation Present? Yes No Depth (Inches): Yes X No
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available
Remarks:

VEGETATION - Use scientific names of plants. Sampling Point: DP -1
Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below.)
Dominance Test Worksheet:
Absolute
Dominant
Indicator
Number of Dominant Species that Are OBL,
Tree Stratum
(Plot Size: 30)
% Cover
Species?
Status
FACW, or FAC: 7 (A)
1
N
2
N
Total Number of Dominant Species Across
3
N
All Strata: 8 (B)
4
N
5
N
Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL,
6
N
FACW, or FAC: 88% (A/B)
7
N
0
=Total Cover
Prevalence Index Worksheet:
Total % Cover of:
Sapling Statum
(Plot Size: 15)
OBL Species 0 x1= 0
1 Fraxinus pennsylanica
20
Y
FACW
FACW Species 100 x2= 200
2 Aer rubrum
10
Y
FAC
FAC Species 35 x3= 105
3
N
FACU Species 10 x4= 40
4
N
UPL Species 0 x5= 0
5
N
6
N
Column Totals: 145 (A) 345 (B)
7
N
30
=Total Cover
Prevalence Index = B/A = 2.38
Shrub Stratum
(Plot Size: 15)
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
1 Acerrubrum
5
Y
FAC
X Dominance Test is > 50%
2
N
X Prevalence Index is 53.0'
3
N
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
4
N
' indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present,
5
N
unless disturbed or problematic
6
N
7
N
Definitions of Vegetation Strata:
S
=Total Cover
Herb Stratum
(Plot Size: 5)
Tree - Woody plants, excluding woody vines, approximately 20 ft
1 Woodwardia areolata
30
Y
FACW
(6m) or more in height and 3 in. (7.6cm) or larger in diameter at
2 Smilax rotundifolia
5
N
FAC
breast height (DBH).
3 Toxicodendron radicans
5
N
FAC
4 Impatiens copensis
30
Y
FACW
5 Arunidinaria gigantea
10
N
FACW
6
N
Sapling - Woody plants, excluding woody vines, approximately 20 j
7
N
ft (6m) or more in height and less than 3 in. (7.6cm) DOH.
8
N
9
N
10
N
11
N
Shrub - Woody plants, excluding woody vines, approximately 3 to
12
N
20 ft (1 to 6m) in height.
80
=Total Cover
Woody Vine Stratum
(Plot Size: 30 )
1 Porthenocissus quinquefolia
10
Y
FACU
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, including herbaceous
2 Lonicera japonica
10
Y
FAC
vines, regardless of size. Includes woody plants, except woody
3 Vitis riparia
10
Y
FACW
vines, less than approximately 3 ft (lm) in height.
4
N
Hydrophytic
5
N
Vegetation Present? Yes X No
30
=Total Cover
Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below.)

SOIL
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Matrix
Redox Features
Depth (Inches) Color (moist)
% Color (Moist) % Type' Loc2
Texture Remarks
0-3 SY 3/2
100
Muck
3-4 SY 3/1
100
Loam
4-9 2.SYR 3/3
70 5Y 3/1 30 C M
Loam
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains.
Z Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils 3:
Histosol (Al)
Dark Surface (S7)
2 cm Much (A10) (MLRA 147)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 147, 148)
Black Histic (A3)
Thin Dark Surface (S9)(MLRA 147, 148)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (1`19) (MLRA 136, 147)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
Red Parent Material (TF2)
Stratified Layers (AS)
X Depleted Matrix (F3)
Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
2 cm Muck (A30) (LRR N)
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (All)
Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
Redox Depressions (F8)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (Si) (LRR N,
MLRA 147, 148)
Iron -Manganese Masses (1`12) (LRR N, MLRA 136)
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
Umbric Surface (F(MLRA 136, 122)
'
Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and wetland hydrology13)
must be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Sandy Redox (S5)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
Stripped Matrix (S6)
Restrictive Layer (if observed:)
Type:
Hydric Soil
Depth (inches:)
Present? Yes X No
Remarks:

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Eastern Mountains and Piedmont
Project/Site:
White Oak Lake Reconstruction Project
City/County:
Wake County Date: 5/30/2017
Applicant/Owner:
City of Raleigh
State: NC
Sampling Point: DP -2
Investigator(s):
T.shelton/1.Rathburn
Section, Township,
Range:
Raleigh
Landform (hillslope, terrace,
etc.):
floodplain
Local relief (ronrere,
c x,n ):
none Slope (%): 1%
Subregion (LRR or MLRA):
MLRA 136 of LRR P
Lat: 35'45'38"
Long: 7842'58" Datum:
Soil Map Unit Name:
Wehadkee and Bibb soils, 0-2% slopes
_Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
NWI Classification: PEM
Are climate/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of the year?
Are vegetation soil or hydrology significantly disturbed?
Are vegetation soil or hydrology natrually problematic?
Yes X No (If no, explain in Remarks)
Are "Normal Circumstances" present?) Yes X No
(If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
of Findings - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc
Hydrophytic Vegetation present? Yes X No
Hydric Soil present? Yes X No Is the Sampled Area within a Wetland? Yes X No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
Remarks:
Hydrology
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply)
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
X Surface Water (Al)
True Aquatic Plants (814)
Surface Soil Cracks (86)
X High Water Table (A2)
Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (88)
_Saturation (A3)
Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (0)
_Drainage Patterns (BIO)
_ Water Marks (Bl)
Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
_Moss Trim Lines (B16)
_Sediment Deposits (B2)
Thin Muck Surface (C7)
_Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
X Drift Deposits (133)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
_Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_Algal Mat or Crust (84)
_Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_ Iron Deposits (115)
_Stunted or Stressed Plants (Dl)
_ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (87)
_Geomorphic Position (D2)
_ Water -Stained Leaves (B9)
_Shallow Aquitard (D3)
_Aquatic Fauna (813)
_Microtopographic Relief (D4)
FAC -Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes X No Depth (Inches): <1
Water Table Present? Yes X No Depth (inches): 2 Wetland Hydrology Present?
Saturation Present? Yes No Depth (Inches): Yes X No
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks

VEGETATION - Use scientific names of plants. Sampling Point: DP -1
Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below.)
Dominance Test Worksheet:
Absolute
Dominant
Indicator
Number of Dominant Species that Are 08L,
Tree Stratum
(Plot Size: 30)
% Cover
Species?
Status
FACW, or FAC: 4 (A)
1
N
2
N
Total Number of Dominant Species Across
3
N
All Strata: 5 (8)
4
N
5
N
Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL,
6
N
FACW, or FAC: 80% (A/B)
7
N
Prevalence Index Worksheet:
0 =Total Cover
Total % Cover of:
Sapling Statum
(Plot Size: 15)
OBL Species 15 x1= 15
1 Alnus serrulate
15
Y
COIL
FACW Species 45 x2= 90
2 Salix nigra
5
Y
FACW
FAC Species 50 x3= 150
3
N
FACU Species 5 x4= 20
4
N
UPL Species 0 x5= 0
5
N
6
N
Column Totals: 115 (A) 275 (B)
7
N
20
=Total Cover
Prevalence Index = B/A = 2.39
Shrub Stratum
(Plot Size: 15 ►
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
1 Rubus argutus
5
Y
FACU
X Dominance Test is > 50%
2
N
X Prevalence Index is 53.0'
3
N
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
4
N
' Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present,
5
N
unless disturbed or problematic
6
N
Definitions of Vegetation Strata:
7 N
5
=Total Cover
Herb Stratum
(Plot Size: 5)
Tree - Woody plants, excluding woody vines, approximately 20 ft
1 Juncus effusus
10
N
FACW
(6m) or more in height and 3 in. (7.6cm) or larger in diameter at
2 Microstegium vimineum
50
Y
FAC
breast height (081-1).
3 Impatiens copensis
30
Y
FACW
4
N
5
N
6
N
Sapling - Woody plants, excluding woody vines, approximately 20
7
N
ft (6m) or more in height and less than 3 in. (7.6cm) DBH.
8
N
9
N
10
N
11
N
Shrub - Woody plants, excluding woody vines, approximately 3 to
12
N
20 ft (1 to 6m) in height.
90
=Total Cover
Woody Vine Stratum
(Plot Size: 30 )
1
N
Herb - All herbaceousnon-wood
( y) plants, including herbaceous
2
N
vines, regardless of size. Includes woody plants, except woody
3
N
vines, less than approximately 3 ft (lm) in height.
Hydrophytic Yes X No
Vegetation Present?
4 N
5 N
0 =Total Cover
Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below.)

SOIL
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Matrix Redox Features
Depth (Inches) Color (moist) % Color (Moist) % Type' Loc2 Texture
0-2 10YR 4/2 100 Silt Clay
2-9 10YR 3/1 60 10YR 3/3 30 C M Clay Loam
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains.
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Histosol(Al)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
Black Histic (A3)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
Stratified Layers (AS)
2 cm Muck (A30) (LRR N)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (All)
Thick Dark Surface (A32)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1)(LRR N,
MLRA 147,148)
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (54)
Sandy Redox (SS)
Stripped Matrix (S6)
Layer (if observed:)
Type:
Depth (inches:)
Remarks:
Dark Surface (S7)
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
Thin Dark Surface (S9)(MLRA 147, 148)
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
X Depleted Matrix (F3)
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
Redox Depressions (F8)
Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N, MLRA 136)
Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
' Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils':
2 cm Much (A10) (MLRA 147)
Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 147, 148)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (1`19) (MLRA 136, 147)
Red Parent Material (TF2)
Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
' Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and wetland hydrology
must be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Hydric Soil
Present? Yes X No

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Eastern Mountains and Piedmont
Project/Site:
White Oak Lake Reconstruction Project
City/County:
Wake County Date: 5/30/2017
Applicant/Owner:
City of Raleigh
State: NC
Sampling Point: UPL•1
Investigator(s):
T.shelton/i.Rathburn
Section, Township,
Range:
Raleigh
Landform (hillslope, terrace,
etc.):
hillslope
Local relief (concave,
com &w ):
none Slope (%►: 1%
Subregion (LRR or MLRA):
MLRA 136 of LRR P
Lat: 35'46'30"
Long: 78"42'53" Datum:
Soil Map Unit Name:
Cecil sandy loam 10 to 15 percent slopes
NWI Classification: N/A
Are climate/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of the year?
Are vegetation soil or hydrology significantly disturbed?
Are vegetation soil or hydrology natrually problematic?
Yes X No (If no, explain in Remarks)
Are "Normal Circumstances" present?) Yes X No
(If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
Summary of Findings - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc
Hydrophytic Vegetation present? Yes No X
Hydric Soil present? Yes No X Is the Sampled Area within a Wetland? Yes No X
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
Remarks:
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply)
Surface Water (AS)
True Aquatic Plants (814)
High Water Table (A2)
Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
Saturation (A3)
Oxidized Rhizospheres an Living Roots (0)
_ Water Marks (Bl)
Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
_Sediment Deposits (132)
Thin Muck Surface (C7)
_ Drift Deposits (B3)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Algal Mat or Crust (84)
_ Iron Deposits (85)
_ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7)
_ Water -Stained Leaves (89)
Aquatic Fauna (813)
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Surface Soil Cracks (136)
Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (BS)
Drainage Patterns (1310)
_Moss Trim Lines (1316)
Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
_Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_Stunted or Stressed Plants (DS)
_Geomorphic Position (D2)
_ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
_Microtopographic Relief (D4)
FAC -Neutral Test (DS)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes_ No Depth (Inches):
Water Table Present? Yes_ No Depth (Inches): Wetland Hydrology Present?
Saturation Present? Yes No Depth (Inches): - Yes No X
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:

VEGETATION - Use scientific names of plants. Sampling Point: DP -1
Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below.)
Dominance Test Worksheet:
Absolute
Dominant
Indicator
Number of Dominant Species that Are OBL,
Tree Stratum
(Plot Size: 30)
% Cover
Species?
Status
FACW, or FAC: 3 (A)
1 Acer rubrum
20
Y
FAC
2 Pinus toedo
20
Y
FAC
Total Number of Dominant Species Across
3 Liriodendron tulipifera
20
Y
FACU
All Strata: 7 (B)
4
N
5
N
Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL,
6
N
FACW, or FAC: 43% (A/B)
7
N
Prevalence Index Worksheet:
60 =Total Cover
Total % Cover of:
Sapling Statum
(Plot Size: 15)
OBL Species 0 x1= 0
1 Quercus rubra
5
Y
FACU
FACW Species 0 x2= 0
2 Quercus alba
5
Y
FACU
FAC Species 45 x3= 135
3
N
FACU Species 35 x4= 140
4
N
UPL Species 0 xS= 0
5
N
6
N
Column Totals: 80 (A) 275 (B)
7
N
10
=Total Cover
Prevalence Index = B/A = 3.44
Shrub Stratum
(Plot Size: 15)
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
1 Caryo tomentoso
5
Y
FACU
X Dominance Test is > 50%
2 Liquidambarstyraciflua
5
Y
FAC
X Prevalence Index is 53.0'
3
N
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
4
N
' Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present,
5
N
unless disturbed or problematic
6
N
Definitions of Vegetation Strata:
7 N
10
=Total Cover
Herb Stratum
(Plot Size: 5)
Tree - Woody plants, excluding woody vines, approximately 20 ft
1
N
(6m) or more in height and 3 in. (7.6cm) or larger in diameter at
2
N
breast height (DBH).
3
N
4
N
5
N
6
N
Sapling - Woody plants, excluding woody vines, approximately 20
7
N
ft (6m) or more in height and less than 3 in. (7.6cm) DBH.
8
N
9
N
10
N
11
N
Shrub - Woody plants, excluding woody vines, approximately 3 to
12
N
20 ft (1 to 6m) in height.
0
=Total Cover
Woody Vine Stratum
(Plot Size: 30 )
1
N
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, including herbaceous
2
N
vines, regardless of size. Includes woody plants, except woody
3
N
vines, less than approximate) 3 ft (lm) in height.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation Present? Yes No X
4 N
5 N
0
=Total Cover
Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below.)

SOIL
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Matrix
Redox Features
Depth (inches) Color (moist)
% Color (Moist) % Type' Loc'
Texture Remarks
0-3 10YR 3/4
100
Loam
3-9 10YR 4/6
100
Loam
' Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains.
Z Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils':
Histosol (Al)
Dark Surface (S7)
2 cm Much (A10) (MLRA 147)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 147, 148)
Black Histic (A3)
Thin Dark Surface (S9)(MLRA 147, 148)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (1`19) (MLRA 136, 147)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
Red Parent Material (TF2)
Stratified Layers (AS)
Depleted Matrix (F3)
Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (All)
Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
Thick Dark Surface (A32)
Redox Depressions (F8)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (Sl) (LRR N,
MLRA 147, 148)
Iron -Manganese Masses (1`12) (LRR N, MLRA 136)
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
Umbric Surface (1`13) (MLRA 136, 122)
; Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and wetland hydrology
must be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Sandy Redox (S5)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
Stripped Matrix (S6)
Restrictive Layer (if observed:)
Type:
Hydric Soil
Depth (inches:)
Present? Yes No X
Remarks:

i�
NC DWO Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
Date: S 3o w?v/i
Projoct/Sita:� :
Latkude: o ••
Evaluator: E� �el
County:
Longitude:
Total Points:
Stnsem is atinter►nlltenf /Q
Stream Determination (circle one)
Ephemeral Intermittent nen
Other
e.g. Quad Name:
lfZ 19 or Jailft 30'
erann
2. Sinuosity of channel along thatweg
0
A. Geomo ho Subtotal = /
AINsent
Weak
Modems
Strong
1` Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
15. Sediment on plants or debris
2. Sinuosity of channel along thatweg
0
1
0 0.5
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. Mft-pool, step -pool,
rlppWvod uence
0
1
®
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1W
1.5
3
5. Activehalict floodplain
0
1.5
2
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
3
S. Headcuts
0
1
3
9. Grade control
0
0.5
1
1.5
10. Natural valley
'greater
0
0.5
1
1.
11. Second ororder channel
No = 0
Yes 3
-ara mm awnes aro not rano; see aisaissans in menuai
B. Wdroloav (Subtotal = % S )
12. Presence of Sawflow
0 1
2
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0 1
3
14. Leaf Htler
1.5
0.5 0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0 0.
1 1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0 0.5
1.5
17. Soil4ased evidence of high water table?
No
Yes = 3
LM:175 'T k &'1TZ7sj17; �
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
2 1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
1
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
0
CP 2
3
22. Fish
0
0.5
1.5
23. Crayfish
0
0.5 CD
1.5
24. Amphibians
0
0.5
1.5
25. Algae
0
0. 1
1.5
26. Wetland plants in stroambed
FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5 Other In
'pe mkd steams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes:
Sketch:

C
NC DWO Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
Date: J�..�
Project/Site:
a
Latitude: o ..
Evaluator: ^'-
County:
Longitude: i ,
Total Points:
Stream Dste circle one)
Other
Sbearn is at load #dwmltfant �� S
Ephemera Perennial
e.g. Quad Name:
if x 19 or rennial ff i 30'
2
3
A. Geo Subtotal =
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
I" Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
M
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
16. Organic debris lines or pies
2
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple-poolsequence
0
Yes
2
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
2
3
5. Active/relid floodplain
1
1
2
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
1.5
1
2
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
2
3
8. Headcuts
1
2
3
9. Grade control
0.5
1
1.5
10. Natural valley
11. Second or greater order channel
0
No
0.5
0
Yes = 3
1.5
'artificial ditches are not rated; am discussions in manual
B. Hvdroloav (Subtotal = g )
12. Presence of Basellow
0 1
3
13. Iron oxidizI29 bacteria
0 1
3
14. Leaf litter
1.5 1
CAD 0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0 Cry
1 1.5
16. Organic debris lines or pies
1 0.5
1 1 1.5
17. SoWbased evidence of high water table?
No = 0
Yes
C. Bklbav (Subtotal = 6.S )
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
CU 2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
1 2
3
22. Fish
0.5 1
1.5
23. Crayfth
0
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
0
1
1.5
25. Abee
0
1
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5 Other
•perennial steams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes:
Sketch:

NC DWO Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
Dae: .5 /2)0/17
Pro)ec"Its: W h I�e, Oak
: N3eLW 39"
Evaluator: Tro rJ' 1 o r►
County: W okk
wuud.:'VIV27V 43b0
Total Points:Stream
sbaw" Is at Isad k*WMN" 3
Determination (eftftAMI
Ephemera) Intanmittcnt croon
Other
e.g. Quad Mama:
Ns 19 orpwwnW Mx 3V ,
2. Snuosity of channel Wong theKwq
0
A. Geom (Subtotal=
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
1` Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
1.5
2. Snuosity of channel Wong theKwq
0
1
2
3
3. In-dwnsl structure: ex riffle -pool, step -pool.
uenoe
02
0
0.5
3
4. Pwdde size of atroem substrate
0
1
2
3
5. AdWatelct tbodplab
0
1
2
3
8. Dapositlo W bars or benches
0
1
2
3
7. Recent MuvW deposits
0
1
2
3
8. Hesdants
1
2
3
9. Grade control
0.5
1
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
0.5
1
1.5
11. Second or greater order charnel
60-
Yes = 3
Sketch:
arttll * ... r1 1 aro not raid; ass discussions In manual
B. Hydrology (Subtotal = 10 )
12. Presence of Besellow
0
1
2
13. Iron o3dd bacteria
0
1
2 3
14. Leaf Wier
1.5
20. Mecrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0.5 0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
0.5
1.5
1& Organic debris lines or piles
0
0.5
1.5
17.3o"ased evidence of high water table?
0
No = 0
es =
18. Fibrous roots in stroanrbed
2
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants In streambed
2
1
0
20. Mecrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
2
3
21.Aquatic Mollusks
0
2
3
22. Fish
0
0.5
1
1.5
23. Cmybh
0
0.5 CD
1.5
24. Ampt"ns
0
0.5
1.5
25. Algae
0
1
1.5
28. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75; OBL =1.5
Other 0
•pe wmW streams may also be i WdMed using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes:
Sketch:

Appendix D
Site Photographs

`�L 5. 30
.�. 7:71
+� l••/�.h .r ,i... -' �� �� �. r tip+C

•'I ..tom y, � �� N i��-RVL .{ 5��
AL
JrT
2017. 5.30
V.- WA-1
`� 2017. 5. 30

e��pwr
' .fit::. -s. '�'- r .."
'.' _ _ i�1�� - _
•
R. . ,,,�„• ,,
2017. 5. 34
r
r
• ,• r '
I
•1 atm
* -
.r ° .y,- •r�ic QAC %
i �� .p•' .
.,
Y ;L• 'iI
1
•W 'ri^S "}'SL •'.''V4 .Nri.:• ..
.= ffs !'!}e�".{ b/+. y�np`+)'•`, )
I
y'�^,� a� - _ ..
- ��'�,. - d W �V.p�r � Tkd,�r� tiM 1 � •+iQ' �� ,�W:f�����'P'�^1•
�4Ejf y> is
�
wrg pr.r
wy!$a�
tl 1 ti j
�" 17 : 5. 3.a

♦ i'i !/�/j/♦iii !i♦'i�♦j// i/♦'i// `� °
i♦ii/i 'i 'i/ii♦i '/ 'i/ii♦ii// i/ ii♦i '/ 'i ii♦ii/♦ '/ �A
`� �
'i i ' �'i�ij�i /j�♦ice/ �/ / ��
� � `
Delineation Area/Length
LEGENDMap
ID
Type Datapoint
Square Feet Acreage Linear Feet
A
POW
222141.61 5.09964925
0
AA
PEM DP2
115385.16 2.64886819
PALUSTRINE EMERGENT (PEM)8
n
0
0
R3 -Stream
297
D (PSS)
o
A C
D
134 -Stream 1
PSS I)P11
167
2146.34 0.04927299
®
PALUSTRINE SCRUB SHRUB (PSS)
Zone (R3)
E
133 -Stream
167
Dewberry Engineers Inc.
Revised 8/25/17
e
551 Piney Forest Road
Danville, VA 24540 PROJECT
PALUSTRINE OPEN WATER (POW)
PROD. N0.
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
♦ v
WHITE
OAK LAKE RECONSTRUCTION PROJECT
50079798
WOUS
Q a a
PERENNIAL (R3)
INTERMITTENT (144)
® 4 •
•
DATA POINT (DP#)
o
�
UPLAND DATA POINT (UPL#)
o ODP
o
F
•
F2
F
-PO Q
•
O
0
o v QQ
Q w
O
Q
w
Z n A
.10
'i;�j��,�i;�i,�♦;moi;/ii;�/;�iiji,�i;�
one
A (POW)
♦ i'i !/�/j/♦iii !i♦'i�♦j// i/♦'i// `� °
i♦ii/i 'i 'i/ii♦i '/ 'i/ii♦ii// i/ ii♦i '/ 'i ii♦ii/♦ '/ �A
`� �
'i i ' �'i�ij�i /j�♦ice/ �/ / ��
� � `
Z R
n e
0
4
0
o'
100' 200'Zone
D (PSS)
BYpASS
TITLE
Dewberry
WETLAND EXHIBIT
DATE
7/13/2017
SHEET N0.
Dewberry Engineers Inc.
Revised 8/25/17
551 Piney Forest Road
Danville, VA 24540 PROJECT
APPENDIX B
PROD. N0.
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
WHITE
OAK LAKE RECONSTRUCTION PROJECT
50079798