20052253 Ver 4_Public Notice_20130207

1 I
1�.�1
US Army Corps PUBLIC NOTICE
Of Engineers
Wilmington District
Issue Date: February 4, 2013
Comment Deadline: March 4, 2013
Corps Action ID #: SAW- 2010 -01947
The Wilmington District, Corps of Engineers (Corps) received an application from John
Koenig, Inc. seeking Department of the Army authorization for a discharge of dredged and /or
fill material into waters of the United States associated with constructing access and
infrastructure for the final phases of Williamsburg Plantation residential subdivision located
west of Gum Branch Road, to the southwest of and between Western Boulevard and
Williamsburg Parkway, in Jacksonville, Onslow County, North Carolina.
Specific plans and location information are described below and shown on the attached plans.
This Public Notice and all attached plans are also available on the Wilmington District Web
Site at
http: / /www. saw.usace. army.mil/ Missions/ RegulatoryPennitProgram /PublicNotices. aspx.
Applicant:
Agent (if applicable):
Authority
John Koenig, Inc.
Attn: Mr. John Koenig
235 Green Street
Fayetteville, North Carolina 28301
Wetland Solutions, LLC
Attn: Mr. Samuel A. Carter
Post Office Box 244
Bunnlevel, North Carolina 28323
The Corps will evaluate this application and decide whether to issue, conditionally issue, or
deny the proposed work pursuant to applicable procedures of Section 404 of the Clean Water
Act (33 U.S.C. 1344).
Background
Four previous permit verifications exist for the Williamsburg Plantation subdivision. On June
17, 1999, the Corps verified the use of Nationwide Permit (NWP) 26 under Corps Action ID #
SAW- 1999 -01103 for permanent impacts to 0.239 acre of wetlands for the infrastructure of the
Hyde Park phase; no compensatory mitigation was required for this project. On October 29,

2003, the Corps verified the use of NWP 39 under Corps Action ID # SAW- 2002 -00602 for
permanent impacts to 0.497 acre of wetlands for the infrastructure of the Regency Park phase,
with the requirement to purchase 0.994 acre of wetland credits from the North Carolina
Wetlands Restoration Program, as well as preserve remaining wetlands on several lots within
Regency Park. On January 17, 2006, the Corps verified the use of NWP 18 under Corps Action
ID # SAW- 2006 -00272 for permanent impacts to 0.02 acre of wetlands for the infrastructure of
the Kensington Park phase; no compensatory mitigation was required for this project. Lastly,
on August 10, 2007, the Corps verified the use of NWP 29 under Corps Action ID # SAW -
2006 -00272 for permanent impacts to 0.0983 acre of wetlands and 86 linear feet of stream for
additional infrastructure of the Kensington Park phase and access to the Emerson Park phase,
with the requirement to purchase 0.0983 acre of wetland credits and 86 linear feet of stream
credits from the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program, as well as preserve
remaining wetlands within the Kensington and Emerson Park phases.
Cumulative impacts to Waters of the U.S. for the Williamsburg Plantation single and complete
project following all permit actions described above total 0.854 acre of wetlands and 86 linear
feet of stream. Cumulative compensatory mitigation requirements total the purchase of 1.09
acres of wetland and 86 linear feet of stream credits from in -lieu fee programs and the
preservation of remaining wetlands within three subdivision phases. Given that the current
proposed impacts to Waters of the U.S., in combination with impacts permitted in earlier
phases, exceed the Nationwide Permit threshold, the current proposal to further expand
Williamsburg Plantation is subject to Individual Permit review.
Previously verified Nationwide Permits can be found with the Public Notice on the District Website
at http: / /www.saw.usace.artny.mil/ Missions/ RegulatoryPermitProgram /PublicNotices.aspx.
Location
The proposed project area is 1,253 acres of undeveloped land southwest of the Williamsburg
Plantation residential subdivision, located west of Gum Branch Road, to the southwest of and
between Western Boulevard and Williamsburg Parkway, in Jacksonville, Onslow County,
North Carolina (34.78335° N - 77.45603° W). The proposed project is located in wetlands and
other waters adjacent to unnamed tributaries (UTs) to the New River, which drain into the New
River, a Traditionally Navigable Waterway.
Existing Site Conditions
The proposed project area is located within the Coastal Plain Ecoregion, in the White Oak
River sub - basin, USGS 8 -digit hydrologic unit 03030001. The site has been historically
utilized for timber and agriculture production and contains stands of loblolly pine from 5 to
fifty years of age, and deciduous forest in the same range of maturity. Two Progress Energy
transmission line easements, one 150 -foot and one 300 -foot wide, run through the western and
northern portions of the property, respectively. Based on the North Carolina Wetland
Assessment Methodology (NCWAM), wetlands on the Williamsburg Plantation property
include a mosaic of Riverine Swamp Forest and Bottomland Hardwood Forest in floodplain
2

areas of the New River and unnamed tributaries (UTs), Headwater Forest in smaller stream
valleys and topographic drainages higher in the landscape, and Pine Flat and Hardwood Flat
systems in inter - stream divide areas of low topographic relief. Jurisdictional streams on the
property include the New River, a Traditionally Navigable Water, and nine UTs, all of which
are Relatively Permanent Waters. Several drainage ditches also exists throughout the property,
some of which are considered Waters of the U.S.
The New River and its UTs all carry the NC Division of Water Quality (NCDWQ) best usage
classification of "C NSW "; "C" refers to those waters protected for secondary recreation,
fishing, wildlife, fish consumption, aquatic life including propagation, survival, and
maintenance of biological integrity, agriculture and other uses, whereas "NSW" is a
supplemental classification intended for waters needing additional nutrient management due to
being subject to excessive growth of microscopic or macroscopic vegetation. The New River
within the project area is on the 303d list of impaired waterbodies due to mercury in fish tissue;
the US Environmental Protection Agency lists the cause of the mercury impairment as
unknown. There are no designated Outstanding Resource Waters (ORW), High Quality Waters
(HQW), Water Supply I (WS-1), or Water Supply (WS -II) waters within 1.0 mile of the project
area.
The property is bordered to the southwest by the New River, to the southeast by a UT to New
River, to the northeast by existing section of Williamsburg Plantation subdivision including
Regency Park, Hyde Park, Emerson Park, and Saint James Park, and to the northwest by
undeveloped Progress Energy Carolinas property and the Lauradale subdivision. The majority
of the surrounding site area to the south and west is undeveloped and covered by a combination
of riverine swamp forest and managed timber land. The surrounding site area to the north and
east contains developed residential neighborhoods.
Elevation in the immediate vicinity of the site ranges from approximately 33 feet above mean
sea level (MSL) in the northernmost extent of the property to 0 feet MSL along the New River.
Wetland Solutions, LLC, consultant for John Koenig, Inc., conducted a jurisdictional
delineation for the proposed site in 2012. The jurisdictional boundaries were verified by the
Corps and surveyed and mapped by a registered land surveyor; a Jurisdictional Determination
(JD) was approved on October 29, 2012 (USACE ID No. SAW- 2010 - 01947).
Applicant's Stated Purpose
The purpose of this project is to construct a residential subdivision.
Project Description
The applicant has proposed to discharge fill material into an additional 0.628 acre of riparian, non -
riverine wetlands and 820 linear feet of streams to complete the final phases of the Williamsburg
Plantation residential subdivision. No temporary impacts are proposed. The proposed impacts to
Waters of the U.S. are the result of 16 road crossings, intended to provide access to proposed
3

upland facilities including single family homes, multi - family housing, and associated infrastructure
such as utilities and amenities. Project plans and a narrative are available on the District Website at
http: / /www. saw.usace. army.mil/ Missions/ RegulatolyPertnitProgram /PublicNotices. aspx.
Table 1. Existing and Pr000sed Permanent Waters of the U.S. Impacts Table
Wetland Impacts Stream Impacts
Impact
(acre) (linear feet)
Verified under N" 26, Action ID: 0.239
SAW- 1999 - 01103, 6/17/1999
Verified under N" 39, Action ID:
0.497
SAW- 2002 - 00602, 10/29/2003
Verified under N" 18, Action ID:
0.02
SAW- 2006 - 00272, 1/17/2006
86
Verified under N" 29, Action ID:
0.0983
SAW- 2006 - 00272, 8/10/2007
Previously Permitted Total
0.854
86
A
0.045
B
0.019
C
0.014
35
D
0.053
96
c
E
0.019
29
o
F
125
s,
a
G
85
H
0.039
I
149
J
0.043
U
IX
K
0.051
65
Cd
L
0.019
M
0.028
90
N
0.257
146
O
0.018
P 0.024
--------------------------- - - - - --
Proposed Total 0.628
820
Subdivision Total 1.482
906
The applicant submitted an Alternatives Analysis that includes a No Build and Off -site Alternative.
This information has been included with this Public Notice as well.
Supplemental documentation and plans can be found on the District Website at
http: / /www. saw.usace. army.mil/ Missions/ RegulatoryPertnitProgram /PublicNotices. aspx.
Avoidance and Minimization Information
Avoidance and minimization efforts for previously permitted sections of Williamsburg
Plantations were documented via the Nationwide Permit process.
For the current proposed impacts, the applicant has stated that proposed road crossings over
Waters of the U.S. were limited to the narrowest crossing footprint where possible. Further, the
applicant notes that proposed impacts to the New River floodplain, a North Carolina Natural
11

Heritage Program (NCNHP) Significant Natural Heritage Area, were avoided, and lots were
designed to avoid wetlands (i.e. wetlands in subdivision common area). Also, headwalls are
proposed on crossings to minimize impacts to Waters of the U.S.
Compensatory Mitigation
The applicant proposes to mitigate for permanent wetland and stream losses through 1)
preserving all wetlands not proposed for impact through the subdivision Restrictive Covenants,
and 2) purchasing riparian wetland and stream credits at a 1:1 ratio from the Bachelors Delight
Mitigation Bank, located approximately 4 miles north of the project area.
Other Required Authorizations
This notice and all applicable application materials are being forwarded to the appropriate State
agencies for review. The Corps will generally not make a final permit decision until the North
Carolina Division of Water Quality ( NCDWQ) issues, denies, or waives State
Certification required by Section 401 of the Clean Water Act (PL 92 -500). The receipt of the
application and this public notice combined with appropriate application fee at the North
Carolina Division of Water Quality central office in Raleigh will constitute initial receipt of an
application for a 401 Water Quality Certification. A waiver will be deemed to occur if the
NCDWQ fails to act on this request for certification within sixty days of the date of the receipt
of this notice in the NCDWQ Central Office. Additional information regarding the Clean Water
Act certification may be reviewed at the NCDWQ Central Office, 401 Certification and
Oversight, 1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699 -1650. All persons
desiring to make comments regarding the application for certification under Section 401 of the
Clean Water Act should do so in writing delivered to the North Carolina Division of Water
Quality ( NCDWQ), 1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699 -1650 Attention:
Mr. Ian McMillan by February 25, 2013.
Coastal Zone Management
The applicant has certified that the proposed work complies with and will be conducted in a
manner that is consistent with the approved North Carolina Coastal Zone Management
Program. Pursuant to 33 CFR 325.2 (b)(2) the Corps is, by this notice, forwarding this
certification to the North Carolina Division of Coastal Management ( NCDCM) and requesting
its concurrence or objection. Generally, the Corps will not issue a DA permit until the NCDCM
notifies the Corps that it concurs with the applicant's consistency certification.
Essential Fish Habitat
This notice initiates the Essential Fish Habitat (EFH) consultation requirements of the
Magnuson- Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act. The Corps' initial
5

determination is that the proposed project will not adversely impact EFH or associated fisheries
managed by the South Atlantic or Mid Atlantic Fishery Management Councils or the National
Marine Fisheries Service.
Cultural Resources
The following description of work is adapted from the applicant's proposal (included with this
Public Notice). Archaeological Consultants of the Carolinas, Inc. (ACC) conducted a Phase I
Archeological Survey of a State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO) approved Scope of Work
totaling approximately 314 acres of the project area. Results of the investigation were detailed
in a 2012 "Archaeological Survey of Portions of the Proposed Williamsburg Plantation
Extension Tracts, Onslow County, North Carolina" prepared by ACC, and available as
supplemental documentation on the District Website at
http: / /www. saw.usace. army.mil/ Missions/ RegulatoryPertnitProgram /PublicNotices. aspx.
ACC identified 26 archaeological resources, including 11 archeological sites and 15 isolated
finds, during the study. Of the resources found, one site of archaeological significance (Site
31ON1833) was identified as National Register of Historic Places (NRHP) Potentially
Eligible /Un- assessed adjacent to the New River floodplain. This site is located at the extreme
southwestern corner of the property, measures 7.76 acres, and is not planned for residential
development due to its location and elevations near the 100 -year floodplain. Site 31ON1833
will be placed in permanent preservation in order to prevent any disturbance or further
mitigation measures as recommended in the archaeological assessment. According to the
applicant, the SHPO was provided a copy of the report, and their review and concurrence is
pending.
Endangered Species
Wetland Solutions, LLC conducted a pedestrian assessment of potential habitat for federally
protected terrestrial plant and animal species over a period ranging from January through June
2011 pursuant to the Endangered Species Act of 1973. Results of the protected species
assessment were documented in a December 13, 2012 "Biological Assessment, Williamsburg
Plantation Subdivision ", available as supplemental documentation on the District Website at
http: / /www. saw.usace. army.mil/ Missions/ RegulatoryPertnitProgram /PublicNotices. aspx.
Fifteen federally protected species are known to occur within the eight subject Counties, these
include the American alligator (Alligator mississippiensis), Atlantic sturgeon (Acipenser
oxyrinchus oxyrinchus), shortnose sturgeon (Acipenser brevirostrum), loggerhead sea turtle
(Caretta caretta), green sea turtle (Chelonia mydas), leatherback sea turtle (Dermochelys
coriacea), West Indian manatee (Trichechus manatus), piping plover (Charadrius melodus),
red - cockaded woodpecker (Picoides borealis), seabeach amaranth (Amaranthus pumilus),
golden sedge (Carex lutea), Hirst's panic grass (Dichanthelium hirstii), pondberry (Lindera
melissifolia), rough -leaf loosestrife (Lysimachia asperulaefolia), and Cooley's meadowrue
(Thalictrum cooleyi).
I

The applicant states a Biological Determination of "No Effect" for fourteen of the species
above, with no determination made for Hirst's panic grass, a candidate species. According to
the applicant, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) was provided a copy of the report,
and their review and concurrence is pending. The District Engineer, based on available
information, is not aware that the proposed activities requiring DA authorization will affect any
species, or their critical habitat, designated as endangered or threatened pursuant to the
Endangered Species Act of 1973.
Evaluation
The decision whether to issue a permit will be based on an evaluation of the probable impacts,
including cumulative impacts, of the proposed activity on the public interest. That decision
will reflect the national concern for both protection and utilization of important resources. The
benefit which reasonably may be expected to accrue from the proposal must be balanced
against its reasonably foreseeable detriments. All factors which may be relevant to the
proposal will be considered including the cumulative effects thereof, among those are
conservation, economics, aesthetics, general environmental concerns, wetlands, historic
properties, fish and wildlife values, flood hazards, flood plain values (in accordance with
Executive Order 11988), land use, navigation, shoreline erosion and accretion, recreation, water
supply and conservation, water quality, energy needs, safety, food and fiber production,
mineral needs, considerations of property ownership, and, in general, the needs and welfare of
the people. For activities involving the discharge of dredged or fill materials in waters of the
United States, the evaluation of the impact of the activity on the public interest will include
application of the Environmental Protection Agency's 404(b)(1) guidelines.
Commenting Information
The Corps of Engineers is soliciting comments from the public; Federal, State and local
agencies and officials, including any consolidate State Viewpoint or written position of the
Governor; Indian Tribes and other interested parties in order to consider and evaluate the
impacts of this proposed activity. Any comments received will be considered by the Corps of
Engineers to determine whether to issue, modify, condition or deny a permit for this proposal.
To make this decision, comments are used to assess impacts on endangered species, historic
properties, water quality, general environmental effects and the other public interest factors
listed above. Comments are used in the preparation of an Environmental Assessment (EA)
and /or an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) pursuant to the National Environmental
Policy Act (NEPA). Comments are also used to determine the need for a public hearing and to
determine the overall public interest of the proposed activity.
A copy of this Public Notice and all pertinent plans and specifications can be found at:
http: / /www.saw.usace. army.mil/ Missions/ RegulatoryPennitProgram /PublicNotices.aspx or by
contacting the Wilmington Regulatory Field Office at (910) 251 -4633.
7

Any person may request, in writing, within the comment period specified in this notice, that a
public hearing be held to consider the application. Requests for public hearings shall state,
with particularity, the reasons for holding a public hearing. Requests for a public hearing shall
be granted, unless the District Engineer determines that the issues raised are insubstantial or
there is otherwise no valid interest to be served by a hearing.
Written comments pertinent to the proposed work, as outlined above, will be received by the
Corps of Engineers, Wilmington District, until 5pm, March 4, 2013. Comments should be
submitted to David E. Bailey, Wilmington Regulatory Field Office, 69 Darlington Avenue,
Wilmington, North Carolina, 28403, telephone [phone].

E
m
a
o,
0
ON
N
.ti
O
N
M
N
STORM PIPE DATA
Rational Method:
Q =CIA Q= (0.35)(6.5)(A) Q= 2.275(A)
AREA(AC) Q %SLOPE LENGTH(FT) SIZE(IN)
3 6.825 0.48 105 30
NOTE: PIPE HEADWALL TO EXTEND 0.5' ABOVE TOP OF PIPE
30
20
10
5
WETLANDS CROSSING
�'0
/
1.977 S.F. (0.045 AC.) /
� 1
/
�7/
/INV=2 ./ ( /
Jq
INV =22.5/
/ J
'00,j
/
PROP. STORM
/ PIPE /
WETLAND CROSSING "A'
WIWAMSBURG PLANTATION
JACKSONVILLE TWSP., ONSLOW COUNTY, NC
PREPARED BY
JOHN L PIERCE & ASSOCIATES, P.A.
NC LICENSE No. C -1888
405 JOHNSON BLVD, JACKSONVILLE, NC 28540
910 - 346 -9800 FAX 910 - 346 -1210 EMAIL: brionJ®jlpnc.com
APRIL 26, 2012
SCALE: HORIZONTAL 1 " =40"
VERTICAL 1"=4'
30
20
10
5

E
m
a
Ln
ti
N
.-i
N
H
O
N
M
N
.ti
STORM PIPE DATA
Rational Method:
Q =CIA Q= (0.35)(6.5)(A) 0= 2.275(A)
AREA(AC) Q %SLOPE LENGTH(FT) SIZE(IN)
1.5 3.41 2.58 66 18
WETLANDS CROSSING
814 S.F. (0.019 AC.)
X25- \
�
24--
30
20
10
\NJ X25 e o \\ r/
1
lsee ° � ICI ✓� /
/N�
§Z-4 4�'OZO
)" L2 ,
\2,INV =23.8
r (see Headwall
NawP-1 detail) I
N
m
5 WETLAND CROSSING "B"
WIWAMSBURG PLANTATION
JACKSONVILLE TWSP., ONSLOW COUNTY, NC
PREPARED BY
JOHN L PIERCE do ASSOCIATES, P.A.
NC LICENSE No. C -1888
405 JOHNSON BLVD, JACKSONVILLE, NC 28540
910 - 346 -9800 FAX 910 - 346 -1210 EMAIL: brianJ®j1pnc.com
APRIL 26, 2012
SCALE: HORIZONTAL 1 " =40"
VERTICAL 1 " =4'
30
20
10
5

ru
E
m
R
m`
a
M
tD
M
.-i
N
.ti
O
N
M
N
STORM PIPE DATA
Rational Method:
Q =CIA Q= (0.35)(6.5)(A) Q= 2.275(A)
AREA(AC) Q %SLOPE LENGTH(FT) S E(INy/
29.8 67.8 0.78 64 i 42 / I
NOTE: PIPE HEADWALL TO EXTEND 0.5' ABOVE TOP Om PIPJ
I I �
WETLANDS CROSSING I I
N N
609 S.F. (0.01 AC.)
35 LF STREAM IMPACT II vV=i 7
30
20
10
5
PROP. PIPE_ -,,_
INV X17.84
4
CV
LO
y 14V= 17.9
— —
���413i 24"RC - _ _ _
���Cemoved) /
&V 17.0\ \ \ `IV
III
I / jI / �
I�
I
i
WETLAND CROSSING "C"
WIWAMSBURG PLANTATION
JACKSONVILLE TWSP., ONSLOW COUNTY, NC
PREPARED BY
JOHN L PIERCE & ASSOCIATES. P.A.
NC LICENSE No. C -1888
405 JOHNSON BLVD, JACKSONVILLE, NC 28540
910 - 346 -9800 FAX 910 - 346 -1210 EMAIL: brianJ®j1pnc.com
APRIL 17, 2012
SCALE: HORIZONTAL 1 " =40"
VERTICAL 1"=4'
30
20
10
5

E
m
a
M
O
.-i
N
H
O
N
M
N
.ti
STORM PIPE DATA
Rational Method:
Q =CIA Q= (0.35)(6.5)(A) Q= 2.275(A)
AREA(AC) Q %SLOPE LENGTH(FT) SIZE(IN)
5.76 13.1 0.57 88 30
NOTE: PIPE HEADWALL TO EXTEND 0.5' ABOVE TOP OF PIPE
WETLANDS CROSSING
2310 S.F. (0.05 AC.)
96 LF STREAM IMPACT -
-24— — —
30
20
10
5
-22— -
- -- ----------- /
IV
INV =19.5 -
�� - -22-N,
i
/
/
IN /
/INV =20.0
Q \PE —
PROP /
i
i
iJ
I
N
i
i
i
i
r
■
WETLAND CROSSING "D"
WIWAMSBURG PLANTATION
JACKSONVILLE TWSP., ONSLOW COUNTY, NC
PREPARED BY
JOHN L PIERCE do ASSOCIATES, P.A.
NC LICENSE No. C -1888
405 JOHNSON BLVD, JACKSONVILLE, NC 28540
910 - 346 -9800 FAX 910 - 346 -1210 EMAIL: brianJOjlpnc.com
APRIL 18, 2012
SCALE: HORIZONTAL 1"=40"
VERTICAL 1 " =4'
30
20
10
5

E
m
a
Ln
ri
ti
N
.ti
O
N
M
N
.ti
STORM PIPE DATA
Rational Method:
Q =CIA Q= (0.35)(6.5)(A) Q= 2.275(A)
AREA(AC) Q %SLOPE LENGTH(FT) SIZE(IN)
33 75.0 2.19 64 42
NOTE: PIPE HEADWALL TO EXTEND 0.5' ABOVE TOP OF PIPE
ON NORTHWEST END AND 1.0' ON SOUTHEAST END.
WETLANDS CROSSING
824 S.F. (0.02 AC.) \
29 LF STREAM IMPACT INV = 14.9._
30
20
10
5
\ � I
PROP. PIPE — — — — — —
\ ip
INV = 13.5';1
I11�
f
WETLAND CROSSING "E'
WIWAMSBURG PLANTATION
JACKSONVILLE TWSP., ONSLOW COUNTY, NC
PREPARED BY
JOHN L PIERCE & ASSOCIATES, P.A.
NC LICENSE No. C -1888
405 JOHNSON BLVD, JACKSONVILLE, NC 28540
910 - 346 -9800 FAX 910 - 346 -1210 EMAIL: brianJ®jlpnc.com
APRIL 17, 2012
SCALE: HORIZONTAL 1 ° =40"
VERTICAL 1"=4'
30
20
10
5

ru
E
AD
m
a
rn
u�
co
ti
N
C,
O
N
M
N
.ti
STORM PIPE DATA
Rational Method:
Q =CIA Q= (0.35)(6.5)(A) Q= 2.275(A)
AREA(AC) Q %SLOPE LENGTH(FT) SIZE(IN)
53.9 122.6 0.75 100 48
NOTE: PIPE HEADWALL TO EXTEND 1.0' ABOVE TOP OF PIPE
WETLANDS CROSSING
125 LF STREAM IMPACT
5' WIDE
625 SF STREAM IMPACT
30
20
10
5
INV =6
INV =7.3
J
WETLAND CROSSING "F"
WILLIAMSBURG PLANTATION
JACKSONVILLE TWSP., ONSLOW COUNTY, NC
PREPARED BY
JOHN L PIERCE do ASSOCIATES, P.A.
NC LICENSE No. C -1888
405 JOHNSON BLVD, JACKSONVILLE, NC 28540
910 - 346 -9800 FAX 910 - 346 -1210 EMAIL: brianJ®jlpnc.com
APRIL 26, 2012
SCALE: HORIZONTAL 1"=40"
VERTICAL 1 " =4'
30
20
10
5

ru
E
m
R
m`
a
n
N
O
O
N
N
C,
O
N
M
N
.ti
STORM PIPE DATA
Rational Method:
Q =CIA 0= (0.35)(6.5)(A) Q= 2.275(A)
AREA(AC) Q %SLOPE LENGTH(FT) SIZE(IN)
28.6 65.1 0.75 76 48
NOTE: PIPE HEADWALL TO EXTEND 1.0' ABOVE TOP OF PIPE
WETLANDS CROSSING
85 LF STREAM IMPACT
3.5' WIDE
298 SF STREAM IMPACT
30
20
10
5
— 12 - - - - --
_
�0 '� - - -- INV= .43
—12` —
12-
NV =8.0 "--13--
WETLAND CROSSING "G'
WIWAMSBURG PLANTATION
JACKSONVILLE TWSP., ONSLOW COUNTY, NC
PREPARED BY
JOHN L PIERCE do ASSOCIATES. P.A.
NC LICENSE No. C -1888
405 JOHNSON BLVD, JACKSONVILLE, NC 28540
910 - 346 -9800 FAX 910 - 346 -1210 EMAIL: brianJ ®jlpnc.com
APRIL 26, 2012
SCALE: HORIZONTAL 1"=40"
VERTICAL 1 " =4'
30
20
10
5

ru
E
AD
m
a
0
0
0
N
N
H
N
N
M
N
.ti
FLARED "END SECARN \
1 \ INV- 8.18\
I v
-31 —
N I
I
33.9
3.x0
-33- 2
FLARED -END SECTION
Grp \ INV =28.5
STORM PIPE DATA \ /
Rational Method: /
Q =CIA Q= (0.35)(6.5)(A) Q= 2.275(A)
AREA(AC) Q %SLOPE LENGTH(FT) SIZE(IN) \
5.1 11.6 0.50 64 30
40
30
20
15
WETLAND CROSSING "H"
WIWAMSBURG PLANTATION
JACKSONVILLE TWSP., ONSLOW COUNTY, NC
PREPARED BY
JOHN L PIERCE do ASSOCIATES, P.A.
NC LICENSE No. C -1888
405 JOHNSON BLVD, JACKSONVILLE, NC 28540
910 - 346 -9800 FAX 910 - 346 -1210 EMAIL: brianJ ®jlpnc.com
APRIL 26, 2012
SCALE: HORIZONTAL 1 " =40"
VERTICAL 1 " =4'
40
30
20
15

ru
E
AD
m
a
M
.ti
C6
O
N
N
H
O
N
M
N
STORM PIPE DATA
Rational Method:
Q =CIA Q= (0.35)(6.5)(A)
AREA(AC) Q
49.0 111.5
J
/ I
- - -'
/I,ti�'1��
%SLOPE LENGTH(FT) SIZE(IN)
0.77 130 60
NOTE: PIPE HEADWALL TO EXTEND 1.5' ABOVE TOP OF PIPE
30
20
10
i
�I
WETLAND CROSSING "1"
WILLIAMSBURG PLANTATION
JACKSONVILLE TWSP., ONSLOW COUNTY, NC
PREPARED BY
JOHN L PIERCE & ASSOCIATES, P.A.
NC LICENSE No. C -1888
405 JOHNSON BLVD, JACKSONVILLE, NC 28540
910 - 346 -9800 FAX 910 - 346 -1210 EMAIL: brionJ®jlpnc.com
APRIL 26, 2012
SCALE: HORIZONTAL 1"=40"
VERTICAL 1"=4'
30
20
10

\\ \\ L\
\ \ \\ \ \\ \ \30
\ \ \ \ \ \\ \\ NA( =24.5 29\
� R\
STORM PIPE DATA
Rational Method:
Q=CIA 0- (0.95)(6.5)(A) Q= 2.275(A)
AREA(AC) Q WLOPE LENGTH(FT) SIZE(IN)
1 2.26 0.56 90 24
40
30
20
15
Q�oe
I 27
1) I l
rA.
i
F�S IN i =25.0
i � I
4
WETLAND CROSSING "J"
WIWAMSBURG PLANTATION
JACKSONVILLE TWSP., ONSLOW COUNTY, NC
PREPARED BY
JOHN L PIERCE do ASSOCIATES, P.A.
NC LICENSE No. C -1888
405 JOHNSON BLVD, JACKSONVILLE, NC 28540
910 - 346 -9800 FAX 910 - 346 -1210 EMAIL: brianJ ®jlpnc.com
NOVEMBER 20, 2012
SCALE: HORIZONTAL 1"=40"
VERTICAL 1 " =4'
40
M
20
15

E
m
a
N
N
H
O
N
M
N
.ti
Headwall with Wingwall
NCDOT 838.27
Inv -17.5
Top =24.5
,/ / / / /ii
Illl�llll_ _ _
IIII ill
1
IIIII� � =J
I ,
II I�
STORM PIPE DATA
Rational Method:
Q =CIA Q= (0.35)(6.5)(A) Q= 2.275(A)
AREA(AC) Q %SLOPE LENGTH(FT) SIZE(IN)
107.5 244.6 1.94 88 66
NOTE: PIPE HEADWALL TO EXTEND 1.5' ABOVE TOP OF PIPE
40
30
20
15
i
Headwall with Wingwall
NCDOT 838.27
Inv -19.2
Top =27.2
WETLAND CROSSING W
NAWAMSBURG PLANTATION
JACKSONVILLE TWSP., ONSLOW COUNTY, NC
PREPARED BY
JOHN L PIERCE & ASSOCIATES. P.A.
NC LICENSE No. C -1888
405 JOHNSON BLVD, JACKSONVILLE, NC 28540
910 - 346 -9800 FAX 910 - 346 -1210 EMAIL: brianJ®jlpnc.com
APRIL 20, 2012
SCALE: HORIZONTAL 1 ° =40"
VERTICAL 1"=4'
40
30
20
15

E
m
a
0
M
01
.ti
N
N
H
O
N
M
N
.ti
\ \ -10
INV -28.0
�P P \PE
� P
lkl
li
)
I1 \ —32` -_
INV =28.5
/ 30— '
/
117-1
\ l
STORM PIPE DATA
Rational Method:
Q =CIA Q= (0.35)(6.5)(A) Q= 2.275(A) )
AREA(AC) Q %SLOPE LENGTH(FT) SIZE(IN)
5.0 11.4 0.69 72 30
NOTE: PIPE HEADWALL TO EXTEND 0.5' ABOVE TOP OF PIPE
40
30
20
15
WETLAND CROSSING V
WIWAMSBURG PLANTATION
JACKSONVILLE TWSP., ONSLOW COUNTY, NC
PREPARED BY
JOHN L PIERCE & ASSOCIATES. P.A.
NC LICENSE No. C -1888
405 JOHNSON BLVD, JACKSONVILLE, NC 28540
910 - 346 -9800 FAX 910 - 346 -1210 EMAIL: brianJ ®jlpnc.com
APRIL 26, 2012
SCALE: HORIZONTAL 1 " =40"
VERTICAL 1"=4'
40
30
20
15
I
/
\ \ -10
INV -28.0
�P P \PE
� P
lkl
li
)
I1 \ —32` -_
INV =28.5
/ 30— '
/
117-1
\ l
STORM PIPE DATA
Rational Method:
Q =CIA Q= (0.35)(6.5)(A) Q= 2.275(A) )
AREA(AC) Q %SLOPE LENGTH(FT) SIZE(IN)
5.0 11.4 0.69 72 30
NOTE: PIPE HEADWALL TO EXTEND 0.5' ABOVE TOP OF PIPE
40
30
20
15
WETLAND CROSSING V
WIWAMSBURG PLANTATION
JACKSONVILLE TWSP., ONSLOW COUNTY, NC
PREPARED BY
JOHN L PIERCE & ASSOCIATES. P.A.
NC LICENSE No. C -1888
405 JOHNSON BLVD, JACKSONVILLE, NC 28540
910 - 346 -9800 FAX 910 - 346 -1210 EMAIL: brianJ ®jlpnc.com
APRIL 26, 2012
SCALE: HORIZONTAL 1 " =40"
VERTICAL 1"=4'
40
30
20
15

E
m
a
N
n
N
N
N
H
O
N
M
N
.ti
\ 79, 0 \
—16—
19—
- -- Z'
\^
STORM PIPE DATA
Rational Method:
Q =CIA Q= (0.35)(6.5)(A) Q= 2.275(A)
AREA(AC) Q %SLOPE LENGTH(FT) SIZE(IN)
8.7 19.8 1.20 104 30
NOTE: PIPE HEADWALL TO EXTEND 0.5' ABOVE TOP OF PIPE
30
20
10
5
NV—,15.\25 \ \ \ \\
- - -22 -- �\
-- 23 - - - - --\
WETLAND CROSSING "M"
WILLIAMSBURG PLANTATION
JACKSONVILLE TWSP., ONSLOW COUNTY, NC
PREPARED BY
JOHN L PIERCE & ASSOCIATES, P.A.
NC LICENSE No. C -1888
405 JOHNSON BLVD, JACKSONVILLE, NC 28540
910 - 346 -9800 FAX 910 - 346 -1210 EMAIL: brianJ®jlpnc.com
APRIL 21, 2012
SCALE: HORIZONTAL 1"=40"
VERTICAL 1 " =4'
30
20
10
5

7
:1
at
M
N
N
N
rl
N
N
M
N
H
1 I
•• ' ' �� I -
�I.
I
. I '
I
- -- Headwall with Wingwall
.. DATA
Rational Q. WETLANDS
.. .1
AREA(AC) Q %SLE LENGTH(FT) 428 973.7 0.76 132 ., .
LA 146 LF STREAM IMPACT
NOTE: PIPE HEADWALL TO ABOVE .. .
MM
_
!A�_fa_
\IAA
/wy
/ /LVf•�\
N_
__________
__________
_r!
L•►_\
AV I,///IIwI�
hMMMI
____
_______rrw►�..�/w�riwnriiwrM
F" Vr�
/A/AIr'A/Al��in��A
/1WMAV�LVA
=0_
�"AV"
"l1
I�7
"�___________
N0WAIV
/w___�
\r�1CJITTJ�rTT�__
"AW
W1 /w
"M'7
"a
N/AA
/.�__—
I\�__i7iiilLilLi7�L1ia7__
IY
\rImo
\II
1iYl
IIIJ�__
MMM%fl�WMMWM/
OWAIN�
M,
—_wavA
_r��ll_c�_____
____rYl��fiI<V1
\ \�lV
/I•
\�lAV
A�Y"MA
A/A/w./
/AY_A\_11-
7AI�_AlWwA
____�
/AAIt�l1IIawl
/�I/r
/%wi10%MYMl�-
WM AW"
rw://
LPL_
A\
1J.V
v1�7
/�_wII�R
w1'w�_wI.
/wIiV
/�1 /IIwVI�V__________
—AWN
FA
_
_�1Ai
�A.
I/ WW
\�_
\�_I
/nLVA-
l�
71`V�i�LIIQ/A/AV
"I
\7—.��I
1
.1- \IFA`1�
—
11.__A
AVI
V__________
\�__________
W/1\__________
1 �'�"Aw
w/A/N/_:\
r r
•A W /..CV/1•_II/
Ar"l
'
ZMZZM"A,10M
l�/ /w�_A
\_71LL1111
S
A�
M I :AV\Y
—/wV
h�_________
_________
�A►
VV1v7
/'_A
/IAIIf�LI�A1�1lw�r�AlNr�c�
N_________
_________�/►V7
"AW
AI
ELI
m Imo\
n IY 1 1
I1 r� it
1 mm Cm
%M=,
M=
1�wI
—� \�L_�—
�I���1—w'�.�_________
WJ AF-
rwwiArsiiAe/in
r� •_________
_________Iw_I
_________'w►_
AAA
I►_AI
//_V�A.V\
/aAl/w�1-
ENNWAR
L_\Fw_mm/
/ wVWA
WAWA�s!/"L.L_A1-
-7C
7.1_________
Vm�________
Arwi
I_ VI�V
\`fl_
\WwVlr
/Alll
%A/A!
/n
W�L'!/�n�_A
/ /n�_l�v
\_lYi1A
A�7
AMA'
"Ar
Ar.�________
I
//YI0WMW1%
W"l'W/�I
/AID
A
IA/L�
\�AVi\V/ADOMM
\VA�1wM
\�7
/I►7
/wIN/
Mr
r.V►I��________
/II
MWI
AF
/YAI
"YIM�\
WA
/L \/L
'�A
—W"
"v
W "w
MA.N
� /LIY�/A\
AI
/A\
Ali
_I
wA�________
r►_w
Wl—
Wl
W"�v""il��I�//AL�/A\V\M1'
Ali!
/ /w}//AY_A\_7►`
Y"MA
"ffi
Al
"I►_
/F/a
/Z�I_________
I_V/A_________
q I NO
WA
Wl_W"V•1/
/�n�_iV-
7CV"AF
�A�iW/Arwv�—
MlW_
f_Vr�_________
__M
__SIN.
M 1 =F"_r
wV1W
""A/AILC�/n\_l
/ /�l"A�_1Y�"A\
"MW/C
"v/MAr
��ILI
/M
�v /.�_
�_r
\\_VW�
__Wl
�AIIIA/A_________
A
\I/L�VAY1wMAM"M►
►�A`vi
\VGA/
/Alit
"M►_
",wN
/ /��
"Ar
A.r•V►I�_r—
/I
AAV
\_V_�I_—
�Al•�I!_A/YAI—
A
IAV________
__IA►�
AID!
/—
_______�
•�
r_
__________
r� Ire
I________
In7.7W�._a�•�_____
_______�
��
�_
__________
_
•rW
mow_____
_______�
•�
�_
__���_____
_.
r.�________
•
• �" M •
M

E
m
a
of
N
N
N
H
O
N
M
N
.ti
STORM PIPE DATA
Rational Method: UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED)
Q =CIA Q= (0.65)(6.0)(A) Q= 3.9(A)
AREA(AC) Q SLOPE LENGTH(FT) SIZE(IN) /
PIPE 1.50 5.85 0.89 72 18 RCP , \
NOTE: PIPE HEADWALL TO EXTEND 0.5' ABOVE TOP OF PIPE —
J
/ \ 1 Ar
WETLANDS CROSSING
764 S.F. (0.018 AC.)
30
20
10
5
' INV =25.0-
,26-
i
/
,2
Ni
N
Vii/
v I
J I �
OR
WETLAND CROSSING "0"
WIWAMSBURG PLANTATION
JACKSONVILLE TWSP., ONSLOW COUNTY, NC
PREPARED BY
JOHN L PIERCE & ASSOCIATES. P.A.
NC LICENSE No. C -1888
405 JOHNSON BLVD, JACKSONVILLE, NC 28540
910 - 346 -9800 FAX 910 - 346 -1210 EMAIL: brianJ®jlpnc.com
OCTOBER 25, 2012
SCALE: HORIZONTAL 1 " =40"
VERTICAL 1"=4'
30
20
10
5

30
20
10
WETLAND CROSSING "P'
WIWAMSBURG PLANTATION
JACKSONVILLE TWSP., ONSLOW COUNTY, NC
PREPARED BY
JOHN L PIERCE & ASSOCIATES, P.A.
NC LICENSE No. C -1888
405 JOHNSON BLVD, JACKSONVILLE, NC 28540
910 - 346 -9800 FAX 910 - 346 -1210 EMAIL: brianJ ®jlpnc.com
OCTOBER 25, 2012
SCALE: HORIZONTAL 1"=40"
VERTICAL 1"=4'
30
20
10

t
P.O. Box 244 Bunnlevel, NC 28323 (910) 890 -2779
December 13, 2012
David Bailey, Regulatory Specialist
US Army Corps of Engineers
69 Darlington Avenue
Wilmington, NC 28403
Re: USACE Individual Permit Application Submittal
Williamsburg Plantation Subdivision; City of Jacksonville, Onslow County, NC
Applicant: John Koenig, Inc., 235 Green Street, Fayetteville, NC 28301910-864-1978
USACE Action ID# SAW- 2010 -01947
Dear David,
1. Project Overview
The proposed Williamsburg Plantation Subdivision project involves the construction of single -
family housing, multi - family housing, and supporting infrastructure (i.e. roads, sidewalks, storm
water management, wastewater collection, utility lines, etc.). As the City of Jacksonville has
continued to grow, primarily due to Camp Lej eune and the Base Realignment & Closure
(BRAG) program, available land and housing have decreased to a level that requires additional
housing construction on marketable properties. The proposed tracts of land that are to be
developed into the Williamsburg Plantation subdivision are currently owned by John Koenig,
Inc. of Fayetteville, NC. The owner wishes to develop these tracts due to their prime location
within the City, the highly desirable and marketable land adjacent to the New River, and location
relative to existing transportation access and other developed areas.
2. Location & Description
The property for this subdivision is 1,253 acres of undeveloped property in the city limits of
Jacksonville, NC, located in Onslow County. The property is located along the New River
approximately 1.5 miles upstream of the US -17 bridge crossing over the New River (White Oak
River Basin, 14 -digit HUC 3030001010040). The property is located immediately southwest of
the intersection of Williamsburg Parkway and Gum Branch Road (SR 1308). Approximately
607 acres of this property, currently zoned R -7, will be developed into a residential subdivision.

The New River floodplain will remain undeveloped. The property has not been previously
developed, but accessible areas have been timbered in the last 10 years. Large portions of the
project area are characterized as loblolly pine (Pious taeda) monocultures of various ages, from
five to fifty years of age, and deciduous forest in the same range of maturity. A Jurisdictional
Determination (JD) was obtained from the Wilmington District US Army Corps of Engineers for
the project area (Action ID# 201001947, dated October 24, 2012, see Appendix F).
The project, as proposed, will result in impacts to 0.628 acres of jurisdictional forested Section
404 wetlands and 820 linear feet of streams, utilizing the current design of the development and
the road network. All of these impacts are associated with the necessary clearing of road rights -
of -way (ROW) to provide access to the proposed lots. It is estimated that 16 road crossings will
occur, resulting in the placement of 5,777 cubic yards of permanent fill materials within
jurisdictional areas and 1,315 feet of culverts for stormwater conveyance. All impacts will be
mitigated through the purchase of credits from the nearest accepted mitigation bank with credits
on hand.
The applicant has requested allocation of the necessary credits from the Bachelor's Delight
Swamp Mitigation Bank. The confluence of Bachelor's Delight Swamp with the New River is
located approximately 2.5 miles upstream of the proposed project.
No Section 404 wetland /stream impacts will result from the development of individual lots. All
Section 404wetland areas on the parent tract, excluding the proposed impacts, will be placed in
permanent preservation to be administered between USACE and the property's Homeowners
Association (HOA). It should be noted that the New River floodplain lies outside of the scope of
the parent tracts' JD due to their inaccessibility beyond /west of the existing power line ROW
(See Figures 3,5). These floodplain areas, which are permanently inundated by the New River
and designated as a Significant Natural Heritage Area, will not be impacted by development or
included in the USACE preservation documents.
The following table summarizes the proposed lot sizes and acreages associated with proposed
land clearing activities for the Williamsburg Plantation project.
LAND USE SUMMARY FOR WILLIAMSBURG PLANTATION
Total
Lot Size & Description
# Lots
Acreage
0
minimum (7,000 sqft) to 1/4 acre
157
35
Z
1/4 acre to 1/2 acre
685
240
5
1/2 acre to 1 acre
180
118
D
1 acre to 1.5 acre
45
54
W
m
1.5 acre to 2 acre
8
14
Q
0
2 acre +
7
32
J
D
Pellitier Parcels
3
31
m
Residential Street ROWS
-
57
Western Blvd ROW (Future DOT project)
-
26
Sub - Totals of Buildable Uplands
1,085
607

JD Section 404 Wetlands on Property
184
Floodplains in Addition to JD Section 404 Wetlands
462
Sub - Totals Wetlands & Floodplains
646
Total Project Area (Parent Tracts) 1 1,253
If you have any questions or comments, please give me a call at your earliest convenience.
Thank you,
Adam Carter, Wetland Solutions, LLC
Cc: John Koenig, Sr.

U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
APPLICATION FOR DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY PERMIT
OMB APPROVAL
EXPIRES: 28 FEBRUARY 20 2013 3
33 CFR 325. The proponent agency is CECW -CO -R.
Public reporting for this collection of information is estimated to average 11 hours per response, including the time for reviewing instructions, searching
existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information. Send comments regarding
this burden estimate or any other aspect of the collection of information, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to Department of Defense,
Washington Headquarters, Executive Services and Communications Directorate, Information Management Division and to the Office of Management and
Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (0710- 0003). Respondents should be aware that notwithstanding any other provision of law, no person shall be
subject to any penalty for failing to comply with a collection of information if it does not display a currently valid OMB control number. Please DO NOT
RETURN your form to either of those addresses. Completed applications must be submitted to the District Engineer having jurisdiction over the location of
the proposed activity.
PRIVACY ACT STATEMENT
Authorities: Rivers and Harbors Act, Section 10, 33 USC 403; Clean Water Act, Section 404, 33 USC 1344; Marine Protection, Research, and Sanctuaries
Act, Section 103, 33 USC 1413; Regulatory Programs of the Corps of Engineers; Final Rule 33 CFR 320 -332. Principal Purpose: Information provided on
this form will be used in evaluating the application for a permit. Routine Uses: This information may be shared with the Department of Justice and other
federal, state, and local government agencies, and the public and may be made available as part of a public notice as required by Federal law. Submission
of requested information is voluntary, however, if information is not provided the permit application cannot be evaluated nor can a permit be issued. One set
of original drawings or good reproducible copies which show the location and character of the proposed activity must be attached to this application (see
sample drawings and /or instructions) and be submitted to the District Engineer having jurisdiction over the location of the proposed activity. An application
that is not completed in full will be returned.
(ITEMS 1 THRU 4 TO BE FILLED BY THE CORPS)
1. APPLICATION NO.
2. FIELD OFFICE CODE
3. DATE RECEIVED
4. DATE APPLICATION COMPLETE
(ITEMS BELOW TO BE FILLED BY APPLICANn
5. APPLICANT'S NAME
8. AUTHORIZED AGENT'S NAME AND TITLE (agent is not required)
First - JOHN Middle - Last - KOENIG
First - SAMUEL Middle -ADAM Last - CARTER
Company - JOHN KOENIG, INC.
Company - WETLAND SOLUTIONS, LLC
E -mail Address - john.koenig.inc @gmail.com
E -mail Address - wetlandsolutionsnc @yahoo.com
6. APPLICANT'S ADDRESS:
9. AGENT'S ADDRESS:
Address- 235 GREEN STREET
Address- P.O. BOX 244
City - Fayetteville State - NC Zip - 28301 Country -USA
City - BUNNLEVEL State - NC Zip-28323 Country-USA
7. APPLICANT'S PHONE NOs. WAREA CODE
10. AGENTS PHONE NOs. WAREA CODE
a. Residence b. Business c. Fax
a. Residence b. Business c. Fax
910 - 864 -1978 910- 864 -0015
910 890 -2779
STATEMENT OF AUTHORIZATION
11. 1 hereby authorize, SAMUEL ADAM CARTER to act in my behalf as my agent in the processing of this application and to furnish, upon request,
supplemental information in support of this permit application.
SIGNATURE OF APPLICANT DATE
NAME, LOCATION, AND DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT OR ACTIVITY
12. PROJECT NAME OR TITLE (see instructions)
WILLIAMSBURG PLANTATION SUBDIVISION
13. NAME OF WATERBODY, IF KNOWN (if applicable)
14. PROJECT STREET ADDRESS (if applicable)
NEW RIVER
Address WILLIAMSBURG PKWY & GUM BRANCH RD
15. LOCATION OF PROJECT
City- JACKSONVILLE State- NC Zip- 28540
Latitude: -N 34.79370 Longitude: -W 77.45180
16. OTHER LOCATION DESCRIPTIONS IF KNOWN (see instructions)
State Tax Parcel ID see attached list Municipality CITY OF JACKSONVILLE
Section - Township - JACKSONVILLE Range -
ENG FORM 4345, OCT 2012 PREVIOUS EDITIONS ARE OBSOLETE. Page 1 of 3

17. DIRECTIONS TO THE SITE
Total distance = 53 miles
From the USACE Wilmington District Office, take US -17 north to City of Jacksonville. Cross New River on US -17 Business. Proceed 1.0
mile and turn left on Henderson Drive. Proceed 1.9 miles and turn left on Gum Branch Road. Proceed 1.5 miles to intersection with Western
wy. Project is located on the western side of Gum Branch Road.
18. Nature of Activity (Description of project, include all features)
see attached.
19. Project Purpose (Describe the reason or purpose of the project, see instructions)
see attached.
USE BLOCKS 20 -23 IF DREDGED AND /OR FILL MATERIAL IS TO BE DISCHARGED
20. Reason(s) for Discharge
see attached.
21. Type(s) of Material Being Discharged and the Amount of Each Type in Cubic Yards:
Type Type Type
Amount in Cubic Yards Amount in Cubic Yards Amount in Cubic Yards
see attached.
22. Surface Area in Acres of Wetlands or Other Waters Filled (see instructions)
Acres see attached.
or
Linear Feet
23. Description of Avoidance, Minimization, and Compensation (see instructions)
see attached.
ENG FORM 4345, OCT 2012 Page 2 of 3

24. Is Any Portion of the Work Already Complete? Yes QNo IF YES, DESCRIBE THE COMPLETED WORK
See attached description of the previous Action ID #s assigned to the previous phases of work on the adjoining properties above
Williamsburg Plantation.
25. Addresses of Adjoining Property Owners, Lessees, Etc., Whose Property Adjoins the Waterbody (if more than can be entered here, please attach a supplemental list).
a. Address- see attached list and map, Appendix H
City - State - Zip -
b. Address -
City - State - Zip -
c. Address -
City - State - Zip -
d. Address -
City - State - Zip -
e. Address -
City - State - Zip -
26. List of Other Certificates or Approvals /Denials received from other Federal, State, or Local Agencies for Work Described in This Application.
AGENCY TYPE APPROVAL* IDENTIFICATION DATE APPLIED DATE APPROVED DATE DENIED
NUMBER
* Would include but is not restricted to zoning, building, and flood plain permits
27. Application is hereby made for permit or permits to authorize the work described in this application. I certify that this information in this application is
complete and accurate. I further certify that I possess the authority to undertake the work described herein or am acting as the duly authorized agent of the
applicant.
j' \--- ATURE OF AP LICANT DATE SIGNATURE OF AGENT DATE
The Application must be signed by the person who desires to undertake the proposed activity (applicant) or it may be signed by a duly
authorized agent if the statement in block 11 has been filled out and signed.
18 U.S.C. Section 1001 provides that: Whoever, in any manner within the jurisdiction of any department or agency of the United States
knowingly and willfully falsifies, conceals, or covers up any trick, scheme, or disguises a material fact or makes any false, fictitious or
fraudulent statements or representations or makes or uses any false writing or document knowing same to contain any false, fictitious or
Fraudulent statements or entry, shall be fined not more than $10,000 or imprisoned not more than five years or both.
ENG FORM 4345, OCT 2012 Page 3 of 3

USACE Individual Permit Application
Williamsburg Plantation Subdivision
City of Jacksonville
Onslow County, Noah Carolina
December 13th, 2012
Submitted to:
David Bailey, Regulatory Specialist
US Army Corps of Engineers
69 Darlington Avenue
Wilmington, NC 28403
Prepared By:
Adam Carter, Megan Faestel, Chris Leach & Brian Sexton
Wetland Solutions, LLC
Post Office Box 244
Bunnlevel, NC 28323
(910) 890 -2779

USACE IP Application for Williamsburg Plantation Subdivision
City of Jacksonville, North Carolina December 2012
USACE Individual Permit
Application Williamsburg Plantation
Subdivision
Table of Contents
16) Other Location Descriptions, If Known-----------------------------------------
17) Directions To The Site --------------------------------------------------------------
18) Nature Of Activity ------------------------------------------------------------- - - - - --
1
1
2
19) Project Purpose--------------------------------------------------------------------- - - - - -- 2
20) Reason(S) For Discharge -------------------------------------------------------- - - - - -- 2
21) Type(S) Of Material Being Discharged And The Amount Of Each Type - 3
22) Surface Area In Acres Of Wetlands Or Other Waters Filled ------------ - - - - -- 3
23) Description Of Avoidance, Minimization, And Compensation--------- - - - - --
A) Avoidance & Minimization--------------------------------------------------------------
B) Mitigation & Compensation -------------------------------------------------------------
24) Is Any Portion Of The Work Already Complete? -------------------------------
25) Addresses Of Adjoining Property Owners, Lessees, Etc., Whose Property
Adjoins The Waterbody --------------------------------------------------------------------------
26) List Of Other Certificates Or Approvals /Denials Received From Other
Federal, State, Or Local Agencies For Work Described In This Application. - - - - --
1. Alternatives Analysis
I.A. No Action Alternative
I.B. Alternative Locations
I.C. Preferred Alternative
3
3
3
4
5
5
6
6
6
6
TOC Wetland Solutions, LLC
P.O. Box 248, Bunnlevel, NC 28323
Ph (910) 890 -2779

USACE IP Application for Williamsburg Plantation Subdivision
City of Jacksonville, North Carolina
December 2012
USACE Individual Permit Application
Williamsburg Plantation Subdivision
Supplemental Information in Support of
Eng. Form 4345 (2/2013 version)
City of Jacksonville
Onslow County, North Carolina
16) OTHER LOCATION DESCRIPTIONS, IF KNOWN
Onslow Countv Tax Parcel ID
PIN
4367-
0119
-7589
PIN
4367-
0127
-1008
PIN
4367-
0158
-8743
PIN
4367-
0759
-7993
PIN
4367-
0779
-4117
PIN
4368-
0333
-5395
PIN
4368-
0450
-1883
PIN
4368-
0450
-5235
PIN
4368-
0470
-1563
17) DIRECTIONS TO THE SITE
Total distance = 53 miles
From the USACE Wilmington District Office, take US -17 north to City of Jacksonville. Cross New
River on US -17 Business. Proceed 1.0 mile and turn left on Henderson Drive. Proceed 1.9 miles and
turn left on Gum Branch Road. Proceed 1.5 miles to intersection with Western Pkwy. Project is located
on the western side of Gum Branch Road.
1 Wetland Solutions, LLC
Bunnlevel, North Carolina

USACE IP Application for Williamsburg Plantation Subdivision
City of Jacksonville, North Carolina December 2012
18) NATURE OF ACTIVITY
The proposed Williamsburg Plantation Subdivision project involves the construction of single - family
housing, multi - family housing, and supporting infrastructure (i.e. roads, sidewalks, storm water
management, wastewater collection, utility lines, etc.).
19) PROJECT PURPOSE
As the City of Jacksonville has continued to grow, primarily due to Camp Lej eune and the Base
Realignment & Closure (BRAG) program, available land and housing have decreased to a level that
requires additional housing construction on marketable properties. The proposed tracts of land that are
to be developed into the Williamsburg Plantation subdivision are currently owned by John Koenig, Inc.
of Fayetteville, NC. The owner wishes to develop these tracts due to their prime location within the
City, the highly desirable and marketable land adjacent to the New River, and location relative to
existing transportation access and other developed areas.
20) REASON(S) FOR DISCHARGE
All proposed impacts are associated with the necessary roadway requirements to provide access to
upland areas on site and in compliance with the COJ interconnectivity requirements. The following
table summarizes the proposed lot sizes and acreages associated with proposed land clearing activities
for the Williamsburg Plantation project.
LAND USE SUMMARY FOR WILLIAMSBURG PLANTATION
184
Lot Size & Description
# Lots
Total
646
minimum (7,000 sqft) to 1/4 acre
157
35
N
1/4 acre to 1/2 acre
685
240
0
Q
1/2 acre to 1 acre
180
118
a
1 acre to 1.5 acre
45
54
D
w
1.5 acre to 2 acre
8
14
J
m
Q
0
2 acre +
7
32
Pellitier Parcels
3
31
°o
Residential Street ROWS
-
57
Western Blvd ROW (Future DOT project)
-
26
Sub - Totals of Buildable Uplands
1,085
607
JD Section 404 Wetlands on Property
184
Floodplains in Addition to JD Section 404 Wetlands
462
Sub - Totals Wetlands & Floodplains
646
Total Project Area (Parent Tracts)
1,253
2 Wetland Solutions, LLC
Bunnlevel, North Carolina

USACE IP Application for Williamsburg Plantation Subdivision
City of Jacksonville, North Carolina December 2012
21) TYPE(S) OF MATERIAL BEING DISCHARGED AND THE AMOUNT OF EACH
TYPE
Total estimated fill material to be discharged into wetland areas = 5,777 cy.
Total linear feet of culverts to be installed for roadway crossings = 1,315 feet.
All fill materials shall be clean structural fill ( NCDOT #57 stone, select materials, rip -rap), that is to be
compacted to NCDOT roadway design specifications /standards.
22) SURFACE AREA IN ACRES OF WETLANDS OR OTHER WATERS FILLED
Total acres of riparian wetland impacts = 0.628 acres
Total linear feet of stream impacts = 820 feet perennial streams
23) DESCRIPTION OF AVOIDANCE, MINIMIZATION, AND COMPENSATION
a) AVOIDANCE & MINIMIZATION
The USACE's policies on avoidance, minimization, and mitigation measures for jurisdictional areas
have been the primary guidance when designing the proposed subdivision. In addition, the City of
Jacksonville's Land Use Plan, Zoning Ordinance, Stormwater Ordinance, and Subdivision Ordinance
were used to identify design constraints previously determined for these areas.
Roadway crossing locations were selected based on the existing lay of the land, narrowest point of
existing hydrology /hydrography, minimal grading requirements to cut in the roadbeds, minimum
turning radii, ROW width requirements, 750' max cul -de -sac length for fire department turnarounds,
and 24% maximum impervious area for low - density.
It should be noted that the New River floodplain lies outside of the scope of the parent tracts' JD due to
their inaccessibility beyond /west of the existing power line ROW (See Figures 3,5). These floodplain
areas, which are permanently inundated by the New River and designated as a Significant Natural
Heritage Area, will not be impacted by development or included in the USACE preservation
documents. A draft copy of the preservation plat and restrictive covenants for this property is provided
in Appendix F).
In addition, all Section 404 wetland areas on the parent tracts, excluding the proposed impacts, will be
placed in permanent preservation to be administered between USACE and the property's Homeowners
Association (HOA).
b) MITIGATION & COMPENSATION
In order to mitigate for the proposed Section 404 wetland and stream impacts for this project, the
applicant has requested allocation of the necessary Section 404 wetland /stream credits from the
Bachelor's Delight Swamp Mitigation Bank. The confluence of Bachelor's Delight Swamp with the
New River is located approximately 2.5 miles upstream of the proposed project. The contact
information for this mitigation bank is listed below:
3 Wetland Solutions, LLC
Bunnlevel, North Carolina

USACE IP Application for Williamsburg Plantation Subdivision
City of Jacksonville, North Carolina December 2012
Bachelors Delight Mitigation Bank
c/o Land Management Group, Inc.
Attn: Christian Preziosi
3805 Wrightsville Avenue, Suite 15
Wilmington, NC 28403
cpreziosi @lmgroup.net
Mitigation of direct impacts during construction of the proposed project will be accomplished through
compliance with the following applicable permits: Permanent Stormwater Control permit issued by
NCDENR Division of Water Quality (Jacksonville is NPDES Phase II Municipality), Erosion &
Sedimentation Control permit issued by NCDENR Division of Land Resources. No wetland /stream
impacts will result from the development of individual lots due to their preservation status.
Mitigation of secondary and cumulative impacts will be mitigated through the City of Jacksonville's
multiple ordinances that address growth and environmental issues. These ordinances, plans, and
regulations were adopted in order to minimize impacts to water, land, and environmental resources
within the City's jurisdiction that may occur as a result of anticipated growth and development. Copies
of these ordinances are available on -line, with web sites as cited in Section 8, References. Electronic
copies of these ordinances and applicable sections are included in the pdf submittal on CD.
24) IS ANY PORTION OF THE WORK ALREADY COMPLETE?
Yes. The following table summarizes wetland and stream impacts permitted through previous phases
that have been constructed. These past phases are located adjacent to the tracts proposed for
development (uphill toward Gum Branch Road) and are indicated in several Appendix C maps as
"Previous Phases of Development."
Previous Phase
Action ID #, DWQ#
Riparian Wetland
Non - riparian
Wetland
Stream
Open
Water
Regency Park I & II
2002 -00602
0.061
0.069
-
-
0.006
0.287
-
-
-
0.074
-
-
Regency Park III
2002 -00602
0.080
-
99
-
Hyde Park
1999 -1103
0.239
-
-
-
Kensington Park
2006- 00272;DWQ #052253
0.090
0.008
86
-
Fraser Park
N/A
-
-
-
-
Emerson Park
N/A
-
-
-
-
Huntington Park
DWQ# 041020
0.221
-
-
0.046
0.200
-
-
-
0.480
-
-
-
0.010
-
-
-
1.387
0.438
185
0.046
4 Wetland Solutions, LLC
Bunnlevel, North Carolina

USACE IP Application for Williamsburg Plantation Subdivision
City of Jacksonville, North Carolina December 2012
25) ADDRESSES OF ADJOINING PROPERTY OWNERS, LESSEES, ETC., WHOSE
PROPERTY ADJOINS THE WATERBODY
See Appendix H.
26) List Of Other Certificates or Approvals/Denials Received from Other Federal, State, or
Local Agencies for Work Described in This Application.
The City of Jacksonville administers in -house much of the State permitting programs that relate to
public utilities and land disturbance projects. These include the following COJ- issued permits and their
State - equivalent permitting authorities:
• Water system extensions - NCDENR- Public Water Supply
• Wastewater system extensions - NCDENR- Division of Water Quality
• Temporary erosion control - NCDENR -Land Quality Section
• Permanent Stormwater Control - NCDENR- Division of Water Quality
Other permits that are required for this project are as follows:
• USACE Individual Permit (submitted, under review)
• DWQ 401 Water Quality Certification (submitted, under review)
• CAMA Consistency Determination (submitted, under review)
• US Fish & Wildlife concurrence (submitted, under review)
• NCDOT encroachment agreements
Applications for these permits, which are not part of the CAMA/Corps review that is currently
underway, will commence once final conceptual design of Williamsburg Plantation has been approved
by the US Army Corps of Engineers, Wilmington District Office. An Individual Permit (IP)
application has been submitted to the Corps simultaneously with this CAMA submission. Because
every individual lot will be examined for constructability relative to potential /future Section 404
wetland impacts, as well as the merits of the proposed road network as currently designed, final layout
of the subdivision can only occur after the Corps approves the concept of development and its
reasonably foreseeable impacts to jurisdictional streams/ Section 404wetlands. Once the Corps is
satisfied that every effort has been made to accurately depict the property owner's intent to reasonably
foresee the development plan that can be implemented in appropriate phases to the extent practicable,
final design of all streets and utilities will be concluded and submitted for the appropriate permits.
Construction will begin in phases, as approved in the Corps - issued IP, after appropriate mitigation
payments have been made and all permits are in hand.
5 Wetland Solutions, LLC
Bunnlevel, North Carolina

USACE IP Application for Williamsburg Plantation Subdivision
City of Jacksonville, North Carolina
I. ALTERNATIVES ANALYSIS
I.a. NO ACTION ALTERNATIVE
December 2012
The no action alternative would restrict the property owners use of private lands that have been
planned for development for many years. The applicant /owner has owned these properties for more
than twenty years and has been a responsible steward of these lands as well as adjoining properties
that have already been developed (Kensington Park, St. James, Emerson, etc.). If the
applicant/owner does not pursue the proposed development actions, it is certain that other
landowners within the City of Jacksonville's corporate limits and ETJ will seek to develop lands
for additional housing in support of Camp Lejeune's growth (BRAC, continuing operations) as
well as the City of Jacksonville's complimentary growth. The applicant/owner is within their
property owner's rights to seek development of these properties for economic pursuits and
appropriate personal uses of the property that are in accordance with the City of Jacksonville's
Land Use Plan and other supporting documents. Therefore, the no action alternative is not
considered a viable option to the proposed actions.
I.b.ALTERNATIVE LOCATIONS
For similar reasons described above, the landowners legally authorized actions on private lands
preclude this alternative from being the preferred alternative. In support of this determination,
please reference the map entitled, Large Contiguous Land Tracts, North Onslow County, located in
Appendix B. The location of trhese properties relative to the existing water and wastewater utilities
available in the City of Jacksonville's ETJ limits cannot be duplicated at the proposed acreages
(600 +). This map includes all large tracts of land (200 acres and greater) that are privately held (in
red) as well as publicly held (in green).
The lack of available lands in private ownership that can be purchased, accessed and developed in
similar fashion to the proposed project, within reasonable proximity to the COJ existing water and
wastewater utility systems, supports the determination that this alternative is not reasonable or
preferable over the proposed actions.
Lc. PREFERRED ALTERNATIVE
For similar reasons described above, the landowners legally authorized actions on private lands
preclude this alternative from being the preferred alternative. In support of this determination,
please reference the map entitled, Large Contiguous Land Tracts, North Onslow County, located in
Appendix B. The location of these properties relative to the existing water and wastewater utilities
available in the City of Jacksonville's ETJ limits cannot be duplicated at the proposed acreages
(600 +). This map includes all large tracts of land (200 acres and greater) that are privately held (in
red) as well as publicly held (in green).
The lack of available lands in private ownership that can be purchased, accessed and developed in
similar fashion to the proposed project, within reasonable proximity to the COJ existing water and
wastewater utility systems, supports the determination that this alternative is not reasonable or
preferable over the proposed actions.
6 Wetland Solutions, LLC
Bunnlevel, North Carolina

WETLAND & STREAM IMPACTS SUMMARY FOR WILLIAMSBURG PLANTATION (12 -13 -2012)
PROPOSED IMPACTS - PHASE 1 & PHASE 2
PHASE 1 SUMMARY
609
0.014
35
3
105
20
29.80
42"
Drainage
headwater forest, RPW present
D
3
2,310
0.053
Proposed
Proposed
Proposed
Proposed
Proposed
30"
88
Proposed
E
3
824
0.019
29
5
145
15
33.00
Proposed
Area @
headwater forest, RPW present
Proposed
3
-
Drainage
Wetland
Wetland
Stream
Stream
Stream
48"
100
Pipe
G
3
Impact #
Boundary
85
3.5
298
88
28.60
Impacts Fill
Impact
perennial stream, headwater forest
Pipe Length
DESCRIPTION
-
Area #
Impact Area
Impact Area
Impact
Impact
Impact Area
(cy)
Location
Diameter
(ft)
1
1,225
0.028
(sq ft)
(acres)
Length (ft)
Width (ft)
(sq ft)
30"
104
(inches)
N
1
11,175
0.257
146
6
876
3,300
428.00
84" x 2
(Acres)
perennial stream, bottomland hardwood forest
PHASE 2
TOTALS
-
A
3
1,977
0.045
3,110
4,687
-
220
3.00
30"
105
degraded, linear wetland
B
3
814
0.019
1 $ 365
40
1.50
18"
66
degraded, linear wetland
H
1
1,687
0.039
62
5.10
30"
64
hillside seep
J
1
1,880
0.043
-
-
60
1.00
24"
90
hillside seep
K
1
2,215
0.051
65
2.5
163
328
107.50
66"
88
perennial stream, headwater forest
L
1
828
0.019
-
-
34
5.00
30"
72
hillside seep
O
1
764
0.018
50
1.50
18"
72
degraded, linear wetland
P
1
1,065
0.024
-
-
-
296
0.10
-
hillside seep
PHASE 1
-
11,230
0.258
65
-
163
1,090
-
-
557
TOTALS
PROPOSED MITIGATION COSTS*
(nearest 0.1 acre)
$ 20,088
$ 23,725
$ 43,813 TOTALS
COST PER UNIT (acres or stream footage)
$ 66,961
1 $ 365
PHASE 2 SUMMARY
C
3
609
0.014
35
3
105
20
29.80
42"
64
headwater forest, RPW present
D
3
2,310
0.053
96
2.5
240
214
5.76
30"
88
headwater forest, RPW present
E
3
824
0.019
29
5
145
15
33.00
42"
64
headwater forest, RPW present
F
3
-
-
125
5
625
318
53.90
48"
100
perennial stream, headwater forest
G
3
Boundary
Boundary
85
3.5
298
88
28.60
48"
76
perennial stream, headwater forest
I
1
-
-
149
4
596
460
49.00
60"
130
perennial stream, headwater forest
M
1
1,225
0.028
90
2.5
225
272
8.70
30"
104
perennial stream, headwater forest
N
1
11,175
0.257
146
6
876
3,300
428.00
84" x 2
132
perennial stream, bottomland hardwood forest
PHASE 2
TOTALS
-
16,143
0.371
755
-
3,110
4,687
-
-
758
1 31,984
PROPOSED MITIGATION COSTS*
(nearest 0.1 acre)
$ 26,784
$ 275,575
$ 302,359 TOTALS
COST PER UNIT (acres or stream footage)
$ 66,961
1 $ 365
GRAND TOTALS
27,373
0.628
1 820
1 -
1 3,272
5,777
-
-
1,315
$ 46,873
1 $ 299,300
1 $ 346,173
1 TOTALS
* The selected mitigation bank, Bachelor's Delight Swamp, has advised that credits are sold in 0.1 -acre increments. Costs are equal to NCEEP's current fee schedule for riparian wetlands and streams.
I DRAINAGE AREA SUMMARY 12 -13 -2012 1
wetIa solutions
P.O. Box 244 Bunnlevel, NC 28323 (910) 890 -2779
Total
Drainage
Drainage
Stream
Stream
JD Wetlands
JD Wetlands
Drainage
Areas in
Areas in
Footagein
Footage in
in Drainage
in Drainage
Drainage Area #
Area in
Tract
Tract
Tract
Tract
Areas
Areas
Watershed
Boundary
Boundary
Boundary
Boundary (ft)
(acres)
(acres)
(Acres)
(Acres)
( %)
(ft)
1
606
238
19%
18,306
57%
54.21
29%
2
259
86
7%
1,272
4%
33.91
18%
3
1,147
369
29%
12,406
39%
95.98
52%
Add. Floodplain Areas
-
560
45%
-
-
-
TOTALS
2,012
1,253
1 100%
1 31,984
100%
184.09
100%
wetIa solutions
P.O. Box 244 Bunnlevel, NC 28323 (910) 890 -2779

Biological Assessment
Williamsburg Plantation Subdivision
City of Jacksonville
Onslow County, Noah Carolina
December 13th, 2012
Submitted to:
U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service
Raleigh Ecological Services Field Office
Attn: John Ellis
551F Pylon Drive
P.O. Box 33726
Raleigh, NC 27636 -3726
Phone: 919 - 856 -4520
Fax: 919 - 856 -4556
Prepared By:
Adam Carter, Megan Faestel, Chris Leach & Brian Sexton
Wetland Solutions, LLC
Post Office Box 244
Bunnlevel, NC 28323
(910) 890 -2779

Biological Assessment for Williamsburg Plantation Subdivision
Onslow County, North Carolina December 2012
Biological Assessment
Williamsburg Plantation Subdivision
Table of Contents
1.
Introduction ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
- - - - -- 1
2.
Project Overview ---------------------------------------------------------------------
- - - - -- 1
3.
Location & Description Of Project Area ------------------------------------------
- - - - -- 2
4.
Ecological Communities -------------------------------------------------------------
- - - - -- 2
4.1.
Loblolly Pine Monocultures ------------------------------------------------------
- - - - -- 2
4.2.
Coastal Plain Bottomland Hardwoods (Blackwater Subtype) -------------
- - - - -- 3
4.3.
Bottomland Hardwood Forest /Riverine Wetland ---------------------------
- - - - -- 3
4.4.
Cypress - Gum Swamp (Riverine Wetlands) ---------------------------------
- - - - -- 3
4.5.
Mixed Deciduous / Coniferous----------------------------------------------------
- - - - -- 3
4.6.
Mesic Mixed Hardwood Forest (Coastal Plain Subtype) -------------------
- - - - -- 3
4.7.
Potential Rough -Leaf Loosestrife Habitat-------------------------------------
- - - - -- 4
4.8.
Survey Methods For Listed Species Habitat ----------------------------------
- - - - -- 4
S.
Results & Discussion - Listed Species --------------------------------------------
- - - - -- 6
6.
Species Accounts - Vertebrates----------------------------------------------------
- - - - -- 8
6.1.
Red - Cockaded Woodpecker (Picoides Borealis) -------------------------------
- - - - -- 8
6.2.
Bald Eagle (Haliaeetus Leucocephalus) ----------------------------------------
- - - - -- 9
6.3.
Eastern Puma (Puma Concolor Cougar) ---------------------------------------
- - - - -- 9
6.4.
Green Sea Turtle (Chelonia Mydas) --------------------------------------------
- - - - -- 9
6.5.
Leatherback Sea Turtle (Dermochelys Coriacea) -----------------------------
- - - -10
6.6.
Loggerhead Sea Turtle (Caretta Caretta) ---------------------------------------
- - - -10
6.7.
Piping Plover (Charadrius Melodus) --------------------------------------------
- - - -10
6.8.
Shortnose Sturgeon (Acipenser Brevirostrum) -------------------------------
- - - -11
6.9.
West Indian Manatee (Trichechus Manatus) ----------------------------------
- - - -11
7.
Species Accounts - Vascular Plants ------------------------------------------------
- - - -11
7.1.
Rough- Leaved Loosestrife (Lysimachia Asperulifolia) -----------------------------
11
7.2.
Cooley's Meadow -Rue (Thalictrum Cooleyi) ----------------------------------
- - - -12
7.3.
Golden Sedge (Carex Lutea) -----------------------------------------------------------
12
7.4.
Pondberry (Lindera Melissifolia) ------------------------------------------------
- - - -13
7.5.
Seabeach Amaranth (Amaranthus Pumilus) ---------------------------------------
13
TOC Wetland Solutions, LLC
P.O. Box 248, Bunnlevel, NC 28323
Ph (910) 890 -2779

Biological Assessment for Williamsburg Plantation Subdivision
Onslow County, North Carolina December 2012
8. Project Effects -------------------------------------------------------------------------- - - - -14
8.1. Upland & Wetland Impacts-------------------------------------------------------- - - - -14
8.2. Proposed Mitigation ---------------------------------------------------------------- - - - -14
8.3. Archaeological Effects-------------------------------------------------------------- - - - -16
8.4. Other Effects ------------------------------------------------------------------------- - - - -16
8.5. Conclusions--------------------------------------------------------------------------- - - - -16
9. References ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ - - - -17
TOC Wetland Solutions, LLC
P.O. Box 248, Bunnlevel, NC 28323
Ph (910) 890 -2779

Biological Assessment for Williamsburg Plantation Subdivision
Onslow County, North Carolina December 2012
Biological Assessment
Williamsburg Plantation Subdivision
City of Jacksonville
Onslow County, North Carolina
1. Introduction
The proposed Williamsburg Plantation Subdivision project would involve the conversion of previously
undeveloped property in Onslow County to single- family and multi - family housing. The purpose of
this Biological Assessment (BA) is to address any potential impacts the proposed project activities
might have on any species listed as endangered or threatened under Sections 7 and 9 of the Endangered
Species Act as well as any critical habitat listed within the project area. Because some of the elements
of the project may require permitting under Sections 404 or 401 of the Clean Water Act (CWA) and
are considered "major construction activities ", this assessment will also summarize any impacts to
jurisdictional waters of the United States within the project area.
As of December 2012, the following nine species were federally - listed as endangered in Onslow
county: Eastern puma (Puma concolor couguar), leatherback sea turtle (Dermochelys coriacea), red -
cockaded woodpecker (Charadrius melodus), shortnose sturgeon (Acipenser brevirostrum), West
Indian manatee (Trichechus manatus), Cooley's meadowrue (Thalictrum cooleyi), golden sedge
(Carex lutea), pondberry (Lindera melissifolia), and rough -leaf loosestrife (Lysimachia
asperulaefolia). Species federally - listed as threatened in Onslow County include: the green sea turtle
(Chelonia mydas), loggerhead sea turtle (Caretta caretta), piping plover (Charadrius melodus), and
seabeach amaranth (Amaranthus pumilus). Also included within the scope of this assessment is the
bald eagle (Haliaeetus leucocephalus) which is protected under the Bald and Golden Eagle Protection
Act and Migratory Bird Treaty Act. One critical habitat designation for the threatened Piping plover is
also listed for Onslow County, although it is restricted to the coastal shoreline areas.
2. Project Overview
The proposed Williamsburg Plantation Subdivision project involves the construction of single- family
housing, multi - family housing, and supporting infrastructure (i.e. roads, sidewalks, storm water
management, wastewater collection, utility lines, etc.). As the City of Jacksonville has continued to
grow, primarily due to Camp Lej eune and the Base Realignment & Closure (BRAG) program,
available land and housing have decreased to a level that requires additional housing construction on
marketable properties.
1 Wetland Solutions, LLC
Bunnlevel, North Carolina

Biological Assessment for Williamsburg Plantation Subdivision
Onslow County, North Carolina December 2012
The proposed tracts of land that are to be developed into the Williamsburg Plantation subdivision are
currently owned by John Koenig, Inc. of Fayetteville, NC. The owner wishes to develop these tracts
due to their prime location within the City, the highly desirable and marketable land adjacent to the
New River, and location relative to existing transportation access and other developed areas.
The following table summarizes the proposed lot sizes and acreages associated with proposed land
clearing activities for the Williamsburg Plantation project.
LAND USE SUMMARY FOR WILLIAMSBURG PLANTATION
184
Floodplains in Addition to JD Section 404 Wetlands
462
Total
646
Lot Size & Description
# Lots
Acreage
0
minimum (7,000 sqft) to 1/4 acre
157
35
Z
1/4 acre to 1/2 acre
685
240
a1/2
acre to 1 acre
180
118
D
1 acre to 1.5 acre
45
54
W
m
1.5 acre to 2 acre
8
14
Q
D
2 acre +
7
32
Pellitier Parcels
3
31
m
Residential Street ROWS
-
57
Western Blvd ROW (Future DOT project)
-
1 26
Sub - Totals of Buildable Uplands
1,085
1 607
JD Section 404 Wetlands on Property
184
Floodplains in Addition to JD Section 404 Wetlands
462
Sub - Totals Wetlands & Floodplains
646
Total Project Area (Parent Tracts) 1,253
3. Location & Description of Project Area
The project area is located in central Onslow County within the Carolina Flatwoods level IV ecoregion
of the Middle Atlantic Coastal Plain. The project area lies within the White Oak River Basin and
major hydrological features in the project area include the New River and its associated unnamed
tributaries. Land use in the area is predominantly residential and commercial interspersed with areas
of undeveloped or previously logged forest. Soils in upland areas are dominated by Baymeade fine
sand, Craven fine loam, Lynchburg fine, sandy loam, and Pactolus fine loam. Wetland soils which are
associated with the New River floodplain consist primarily of Dorovan muck. (USDA, 1992).
4. Ecological Communities
4.1. Loblolly Pine Monocultures
The proposed development is designed predominantly within upland areas on the eastern side of
the New River. These upland areas are dominated by early and mid- to early successional loblolly
pine (Pious taeda) monocultures. The early- successional loblolly pine monocultures are
2 Wetland Solutions, LLC
Bunnlevel, North Carolina

Biological Assessment for Williamsburg Plantation Subdivision
Onslow County, North Carolina
December 2012
dominated by densely spaced, young loblolly pines while the mid - successional monocultures also
include an understory of sweetgum (Liquidambar styraciflua) and wax myrtle (Myrica cerifera).
Wax myrtle is more commonly found along the edges near roads. Woody vines in these areas
include muscadine grape (Vitis rotundifolia), crossvine (Bignonia capreolata) and common
greenbrier (Smilax rotundifolia). The herbaceous layer in these areas is minimal and Carolina
wiregrass (Aristida stricta) is only sparsely present throughout these monocultures.
4.2. Coastal Plain Bottomland Hardwoods (Blackwater Subtype)
Typical overstory species in these areas include willow oak (Quercus phellos), American beech
(Fagus grandifolia), tulip poplar (Liriodendron tulipifera), white oak (Q. alba), and red maple
(Acer rubrum). The understory consists of American beech, American holly (Ilex opaca),
flowering dogwood (Cornus florida) and ironwood (Carpinus caroliniana). The sparse herbaceous
layer includes Christmas fern (Polystichum acrostichoides) and heartleaf (Hexastylis arifolia).
4.3. Bottomland Hardwood Forest/Riverine Wetland
Transitional areas between bottomland hardwoods and cypress /gum swamp communities.
Dominant canopy species in these floodplain communities were variable and include swamp
chestnut oak (Q. michauxii), bald cypress (Taxodium distichum), sweetgum, water oak (Q. nigra),
and red maple. Understory species include ironwood, American holly, red maple, and sweetgum.
Woody vine species include poison ivy (Toxicodendron radicans) and common greenbrier. Giant
cane (Arundinaria gigantea) was common but irregularly dispersed.
4.4. Cypress — Gum Swamp (Riverine wetlands)
These areas are defined by species that are either obligate or facultative wetland species. Dominant
canopy species include bald cypress, pond pine (Pious serotina), sweetgum, water tupelo (Nyssa
aquatica), and loblolly bay (Gordonia lasianthus). Understory species include red bay, silky
willow (Salix sericea), sweetbay magnolia (Magnolia virginiana). The shrub and herbaceous layers
are limited but include dwarf palmetto (Sabal minor) and soft rush (Juncus effusus). Switch cane in
these areas was limited to the slopes between these and other areas.
4.5. Mixed Deciduous /Coniferous
Transitional areas between loblolly monocultures and bottomland hardwoods. Dominant species
include loblolly pine, water oak, ironwood, American holly, and flowering dogwood. The shrub
layer includes gallberry (Ilex coriacea), red bay (Persea borbonia), and American holly.
Herbaceous species include Andropogon spp. and switchgrass (Panicum virgatum).
4.6. Mesic Mixed Hardwood Forest (Coastal Plain Subtype)
The dominant canopy species in American beech, interspersed with tulip poplar, water oak and red
maple. Understory species include ironwood, flowering dogwood, and red maple. The sparse
shrub layer is composed of hop hornbeam (Ostrya virginiana), American holly, and sourwood
(Oxydendrum arboretum). The only regularly occurring herbaceous species was Christmas fern.
TOM* 3 Wetland Solutions, LLC
Bunnlevel, North Carolina
!

Biological Assessment for Williamsburg Plantation Subdivision
Onslow County, North Carolina
4.7. Potential Rough -Leaf Loosestrife Habitat
December 2012
Several areas within the maintained utility line corridors appear to have community structure, soil
and hydrological conditions that may provide suitable habitat for the rough - leaved loosestrife.
Because the rough - leaved loosestrife shares similar requirements in hydrology, soil, and
community structure with the golden sedge, Cooley's meadow -rue and pondberry (described
below), these areas were considered potential habitat for those species as well. See Figure 3 below
for the location of areas identified as potentially suitable for these species.
4.8. Survey Methods for Listed Species Habitat
Prior to any surveys, USGS Topographic maps, USDA Soil maps and aerial photographs were
reviewed to identify those areas that might contain habitat for listed species (see Figure 2) Species
to be included in potential surveys were identified as described above. Jurisdictional
waters /wetlands within the project area were previously delineated. All delineations were
completed in accordance with the 1987 Corps of Engineers Wetland Delineation Manual (USACE,
1987) and the Interim Regional Supplement to the COE Wetland Delineation Manual: Atlantic and
Gulf Coastal Plain Region.
Surveys to identify community types and potential habitat for listed species were conducted in
January 2011 and April 2011. Species determinations made during these surveys were augmented
using wetland data sheets completed between November 2007 and January 2008. All surveys to
identify potential habitat for listed species were completed on foot and expedited with the use of
ATV. Although the maintained utility lines are not included in the proposed development areas,
these areas were surveyed on foot due to their proximity to the proposed development. Transects of
all areas were conducted and areas that could potentially support listed species were identified and
as shown on Figure 3. These surveys included identification of potential foraging and nesting
habitat for eagles and red - cockaded woodpecker.
More detailed surveys were conducted on June 2, 2011. The purpose of these surveys was to
determine the presence of listed species within those areas previously identified as potentially
suitable. These areas were visually assessed on foot. A listing of observed plant and animal species
is included below in Table 1.
Table 1: Observed Plant & Animal Species List from Detailed Surveys
Species*
Acer floridanum
Acer rubrum
Albizia julibrissin
Alnus serrulata
Amelanchier sp
Andropogon virginicus
Arundinaria tecta
Baccharis halimifolia
Bignonia capreolata
Common Name AREA A AREA B AREA Ct AREA D
Southern sugar maple
Red maple
Silk tree
Brook -side alder
Service berry
Broomsedge
Switchcane
Eastern baccharis
Crossvine
4
VW_ 4 Wetland Solutions, LLC
Bunnlevel, North Carolina
C1

Biological Assessment for Williamsburg Plantation Subdivision
Onslow County, North Carolina
Species*
Common Name AREA A AREA B
-ican beauty berry 2
ampsis radicans
Trumpet creeper
arex lurida
Shallow sedge
arpinus caroliniana
American hornbeam
arya alba
Mockernut hickory
fethra alnifolia
Coast pepper -bush
ornus florida
Flowering dogwood
ichanthelium sp
Witchgrass
iospyros virginiana
Common persimmon
uonymous americana
Strawberry bush
upatorium capilifolium
Small dog fennel
2g us grandifolia
American beech
,axinus pennsylvanica
Green ash
elsemium sempervirens
Yellow jessamine
elenium amarum
Five -leaf sneezeweed
exastylis arifolia
Little brownjug
ypericum hypericoides
St. Andrews cross
ex glabra
Inkberry
ex opaca var opaca
American holly
incus effusus
Soft rush
?spedeza cuneata
Chinese bushclover
quidambarstyraciflua
Sweetgum
riodendron tulipifera
Tulip poplar
,rzula sp
Woodrush
lagnolia virginiana
Sweetbay magnolia
litchella repens
Partridge -berry
lorella cerifera
Small wax myrtle
yssa sylvatica
Swamp tupelo
smundastrum cinnamomeum
Cinnamon fern
strya virginica
Eastern hop hornbeam
xydendrum arboreum
Sourwood
gnus taeda
Loblolly pine
run us sp
Cherry /Plum
teridium aquilinum
Bracken fern
uercus alba
White oak
uercus laevis
Turkey oak
uercus michauxii
Swamp chestnut oak
uercus nigra
Water oak
assafras albidum
Sassafras
:irpus sp
Bulrush
,nilax bona -nox
Saw greenbrier
,nilax glauca
Cat greenbrier
,nilax rotundifolia
Common greenbrier
✓mplocos tinctoria
Common sweet leaf
rachelospermum difforme
Climbing dogbane
Vpha latifolia
Broadleaf cattail
accinium arboreum
Farckleberry
December 2012
AREA Ct AREA D
Ow 5 Wetland Solutions, LLC
Bunnlevel, North Carolina
KM" nl'�111111111

Biological Assessment for Williamsburg Plantation Subdivision
Onslow County, North Carolina December 2012
Species* Common Name AREA A AREA B AREA Ct AREA D
Vaccinium tenellum Gale -leaf blueberry 2
Vitis rotundifolia Muscadine grape 2 5 1 5
Vitis sp Grape 2 1
*Nomenclature follows Weakley 2010
T AREA C presence only data
5. Results & Discussion — Listed Species
Species addressed in this document were chosen due to known occurrences in Onslow County. This
was determined by reviewing U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) Threatened and Endangered
Species Database System (TESS) (USFWS, 2009a) records and reviewing North Carolina Natural
Heritage Program ( NCNHP) records. See Table 2 and Figure 4 below.
There are 14 species listed by the USFWS as threatened or endangered in Onslow County, North
Carolina (USFWS, 2007a). Based on consultation with Mr. Howard Hall of the USFWS Raleigh Field
Office on November 11, 2010, the American alligator (Alligator mississippiensis) which is listed as
threatened due to similarity of appearance will not need to be addressed within the scope of this
project. Additionally, Mr. Hall indicated the West Indian manatee (Trichechus manatus) can also be
excluded from consideration due to lack of suitable habitat (i.e., streams of at least 3 feet in depth with
direct connection to navigable waters). In addition to those species listed as threatened or endangered,
the Bald eagle (Haliaeetus leucocephalus) was included in this assessment in accordance with the Bald
and Golden Eagle Protection Act (16 U.S.C. 668a -c) and the Migratory Bird Treaty Act (16 U.S.C.
703 -712).
At the request of the US Army Corps of Engineers, Wilmington District, a search of the North
Carolina Natural Heritage Program ( NCNHP) species listing database was conducted (NCDENR, 2001).
This search, which is defined by USGS topographic quadrangle, identified only one species listed as
endangered (red- cockaded woodpecker) and one species listed as threatened due to similarity of
appearance (American alligator). It should be noted that both of these records are listed in this
NCNHP database as "Historical ". The results of this data search are listed below in Table 3. No
information concerning listed species or habitats was available through the USFWS "Information,
Planning and Conservation System" online resources ( "IPaC "). See Table 2 and Figure 4 below.
4obw 6 Wetland Solutions, LLC
Bunnlevel, North Carolina

Biological Assessment for Williamsburg Plantation Subdivision
Onslow County, North Carolina December 2012
cable 2: species iistea for Unsiow l.ounty under the r:nctangerea species Act (uar via, zuu i
Common Name Scientific name Federal Record Status
Status*
Vertebrate:
Bald ea le
TOPOGRAPHIC MAP RECORD SEARCH RESULTS
[fopo Map Name is like 'Jacksonville North] [Any Scientific Name] [Any Common Name] [Any State Rank] [Any Global Rank] [Any Name
Category] [Any Protection Status]
Records Returned: [Invertebrate Animal: 11 [Natural Community: 3] [Vertebrate Animal: 21 [Total: 6]
BGPA
Current
Haliaeetus leucoce halus
East
T000 Me
T000 MaQ
Status Status
Rank
Green sea turtle
Chelonia mydas
T
Current
Leathe
�elys coriacea
Jacksonville
Historical
Loggerhead sea turtle
Caretta caretta
T
Current
Piping plo
Charadrius melodus
T
Current
Red - cockaded woodpecker
Picoides borealis
E
Current
Shortnose sturge
Acipenser brevirostrum
E
Historical
West Indian manatee
Trichechus manatus
E
Current
• Non
S4 G4G5
Jacksonville
Current
Vascular Plant:
North
E
Current
Golden sedge
Carex lutea
Jacksonville
ssifolia
CEEPW
Rough - leaved loosestrife
Lysimachia asperulaefolia
E
Current
Amaranthus pumiluslMW
T
Current
S3 G5
Nonvascular Plant: None
Historical
*E = Endangered; T = Threatened; BGPA = Bald and Gold Eagle Protection Act
Table 3: NC Natural Heritage Program
Two -Mile USGS Topographic search, Jacksonville North quadrangle
Search Criteria:
TOPOGRAPHIC MAP RECORD SEARCH RESULTS
[fopo Map Name is like 'Jacksonville North] [Any Scientific Name] [Any Common Name] [Any State Rank] [Any Global Rank] [Any Name
Category] [Any Protection Status]
Records Returned: [Invertebrate Animal: 11 [Natural Community: 3] [Vertebrate Animal: 21 [Total: 6]
Name Catepory
Scientific Name (click for map)
Common Name State Federal
State Rank Global
T000 Me
T000 MaQ
Status Status
Rank
Status
Invertebrate Animal
Chlorochroa dismalia
Dismal Swamp Green Stink Bug SR
Si? GU
Jacksonville
Historical
North
Natural Community
High pocosin
54 G4
Jacksonville
Current
North
Natural Community
Pond pine woodland
S4 G4G5
Jacksonville
Current
North
Natural Community
Tidal cypress - -oum swamo
S3 C,4
Jacksonville
Current
North
Vertebrate Animal
Alligator mississippiensis
American Alligator T T(S /A)
S3 G5
Jacksonville
Historical
North
Vertebrate Animal
Picoides borealis
Red-cockaded Woodpecker E E
S2 G3
Jacksonville
Historical
North
Explanation of codes NC Topographic May Index
Results
current as of Thursday, 25 November 2010 @ 21:00:24 EST
NORTH CAROLINA NATURAL HERITAGE PROGRAM
DIVISION OF NATURAL RESOURCES PLANNING AND CONSERVATION
DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
1601 MSC
RALEIGH NC 27699 -1601
7 Wetland Solutions, LLC
1�r Bunnlevel, North Carolina

Biological Assessment for Williamsburg Plantation Subdivision
Onslow County, North Carolina December 2012
6. Species Accounts — Vertebrates
6.1. Red - Cockaded Woodpecker (Picoides Borealis)
The Red - cockaded woodpecker (RCW) was listed as endangered under the Endangered Species Act
(ESA) in 1970. The RCW is about the size of the common cardinal and is distinguished from similar
species such as the hairy woodpecker (P. villosus) and downy woodpecker (P. pubescens) by its red
cockade, large white cheek patches and barred back (National Geographic, 1987). Juveniles lack the
red cockade but may have a red patch in the center of their black crown. This patch disappears during
the fall of their first year at which time their red - cockades appear. Female RCW lack the red cockade
(USFWS, 2009b).
The RCW requires large stands of mature or old growth pine forests with limited understory and a
groundcover dominated by wiregrass or other bunch grasses. RCW are unique in that they bore their
nest cavities in living trees, unlike other cavity nesters that typically use dead trees. Longleaf pines
(Pious palustris) are most commonly preferred, but other species of southern pine are also acceptable.
Cavities are excavated in mature pines, generally over 80 years old. Because the RCW makes its
cavity completely within the heartwood of these larger (older trees), the longleaf seems to be preferred,
perhaps due to its susceptibility to a fungus called red heart disease. This fungus attacks the heartwood
making it softer and easier to excavate (USFWS, 2003). Cavity excavation takes one to six years.
Foraging habitat also consists of open pine forest/savannahs with limited understory and abundant
bunchgrasses but may include younger trees (30 years and older).
RCW are territorial, non - migratory cooperative breeders. They normally form colonies consisting of
one breeding pair assisted by zero to four non - breeding males from previous clutches. The aggregate
of cavity trees is called a cluster and may include 1 to 20 or more cavity trees on 3 to 60 acres. The
average cluster covers approximately 10 acres. Cavity trees that are being actively used have
numerous, small resin wells which exude sap. The birds keep the sap flowing apparently as a cavity
defense mechanism against rat snakes and other predators. The typical territory for a group ranges
from about 125 to 200 acres, but territories of around 60 acres to an upper extreme of more than 600
acres have been observed. Territory size is directly related to both habitat suitability and population
density (USFWS, 2003).
In mid - April, the female RCW usually lays a clutch of three to five white eggs in the breeding male's
roost cavity. Eggs hatch after 10 -12 days of incubation and nestlings fledge from the nest cavity 24 -27
days after hatching. RCW require a lot of care from parents and helpers who will feed the nestlings and
clean the cavity of waste during the nestling period. After fledging, the young birds continue to be fed
by adults for up to six months at which time the majority of fledglings disperse from the territory
where they hatched. Personnel from Wetland Solutions visited Weymouth Woods, a managed area for
the RCW in Southern Pines for the purpose of familiarizing themselves with the RCW. While at
Weymouth Woods, one RCW (female) was observed, as were both active and inactive cavities.
Neither individual RCW nor active cavities were observed during the biological survey for
Williamsburg Plantation. Surveys for suitable nesting and foraging habitat revealed no suitable habitat
within the action area of this project.
Biological determination: No effect
8 Wetland Solutions, LLC
Bunnlevel, North Carolina

Biological Assessment for Williamsburg Plantation Subdivision
Onslow County, North Carolina December 2012
6.2. Bald Eagle (Haliaeetus Leucocephalus)
After seriously declining in numbers from the late 19th century to 1970, bald eagle populations have
recovered and the bald eagle was delisted in 2007. Breeding populations have become established
across many areas of the lower 48 states including Florida, the Northeast, Great Lakes, the Greater
Yellowstone area and the Pacific Northwest (NCDENR, 2001). Although it was removed from the
endangered species list, the bald and golden eagles remain protected under the Migratory Bird Treaty
Act and the Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act. Bald eagle distribution varies seasonally but they
are known to nest near rivers, lakes, coastlines and other open waters. They often nest in the tallest,
most mature trees that have limbs large enough to hold their nests, which can weigh as much as 1,000
ponds. Nest or foraging areas often include snags and other perches with an open view to the water.
The New River widens approximately 1 mile to the south of the project, creating potential foraging
habitat. However, there were no individual eagles or nests observed during surveys conducted for this
assessment. Based on these surveys and information provided in the National Bald Eagle Management
Guidelines (USFWS, 2007b), no bald eagles will be disturbed or adversely affected within the action
area of this project.
Biological determination: No effect
6.3. Eastern Puma (Puma Concolor Cougar)
The eastern puma is a large, long - tailed cat that can grow to 8 feet in length. It is buffy brown to
reddish brown in color above, and pale white below. The eastern puma is secretive and nocturnal and
little is known about its habitat preferences. It is believed to range from 5 to 20 miles daily for females
and up to 25 miles for males. It feeds primarily on deer, but will also feed on small mammals, turkeys
and livestock. Sightings have been reported in North Carolina, and the number of sightings has
increased, but as of March 2007, none of these sightings have been confirmed as cougars (USFW,
2007c). No suitable habitat exists within the project area and no cougars or signs of cougars have been
observed on the project site.
Biological determination: No effect
6.4. Green Sea Turtle (Chelonia Mydas)
The green sea turtle is a large sea turtle that can grow to 5' long and weigh up to 700 pounds. The
adult green sea turtle are herbivorous, feeding on sea grasses and algae. Juveniles will also feed on
jellyfish, crustaceans and sponges. Green sea turtles migrate great distances between feeding areas and
nesting sites. Mating occurs every two to four years and nesting usually occurs on sandy beaches
where the females can dig with their flippers (NatGeo, 2011).
Threats to the sea turtle include hunting for their meat and eggs, collisions with boats, drowning due to
fishing net entanglement and destruction of nesting habitat. Formal surveys were not conducted as
there is no suitable habitat within the project area and no direct or indirect impacts are anticipated from
the proposed project.
Biological determination: No effect
Wetland Solutions, LLC
Bunnlevel, North Carolina

Biological Assessment for Williamsburg Plantation Subdivision
Onslow County, North Carolina December 2012
6.5. Leatherback Sea Turtle (Dermochelys Coriacea)
The Leatherback sea turtle is the largest living turtle. Unlike other sea turtles, the leatherback's
carapace is rubber -like and flexible. Leatherbacks are known to nest around the globe, but the majority
of nests in the Atlantic are found in the greater Caribbean area. Nesting on the east coast, which
occurs predominantly in Florida and Georgia normally begins in May. Females prefer high energy
beaches with deep, unobstructed access (USFWS, 1992). Leatherbacks are used less for meat and eggs
than other sea turtles but are threatened in a number of other ways including beach erosion and beach
nourishment. Beach nourishment (replacement of sand lost from erosion) can bury nests, disrupt
nesting and cause compaction that prevents the female from digging nests. Leatherbacks are also
threatened by collision with boats and drowning caused by fishing net entanglement. Studies have also
shown that artificial lighting can cause disorientation and result in high mortality for hatchlings as they
try to reach the ocean (USFWS, 1992). Formal surveys were not conducted as there is no suitable
terrain within the project area and no direct or indirect impacts are anticipated from the project.
Biological determination: No effect
6.6. Loggerhead Sea Turtle (Caretta Caretta)
Loggerhead sea turtles are named for their relatively large heads and feature a heart shaped carapace
that is reddish -brown color in adults and sub - adults. Near shore coastal areas are used by juveniles
until maturation and for foraging and interesting habitat by adults. Bays, sounds and estuaries along
the Atlantic coast are seldom used by adults (NOAA, 2011). Loggerhead turtles nest on ocean beaches
and occasionally on estuarine shorelines with suitable beaches (USFWS, 2001a). Loggerheads face
many of the same threats as other turtles, on both nesting beaches and in the marine environment. The
greatest threat is incidental capture in fishing gear, primarily in longlines and gillnets, but also in
trawls, traps and pots, and dredges. Harvesting for meat still occurs in many places (e.g., the Bahamas,
Cuba, and Mexico) (National Marine Fisheries Service, 2011). Formal surveys were not conducted as
there is no suitable habitat within the project area and no direct or indirect impacts are anticipated from
the proposed project.
Biological determination: No effect
6.7. Piping Plover (Charadrius Melodus)
The Atlantic coast piping plover was listed as threatened in 1986. It breeds along the Atlantic coast
from Newfoundland to South Carolina, the Northern Great Plains, and the Great Lakes Region. They
are considered threatened on their wintering grounds, which extends from North Carolina south to the
Gulf Coast and the Caribbean. The piping plovers nests on various zones of coastal and barrier island
sandy beaches. Foraging habitats include intertidal zones of ocean beaches, mudflats, wrack lines and
shorelines of other coastal features such as salt marshes, ponds and lagoons (USFWS, 1996a). The
nearest critical habitat to the project area is shown below in Figure S. No nesting or foraging habitat
exists within the project area and no direct or indirect impacts are anticipated.
Biological determination: No effect
Biological determination for critical habitat: No effect
10 Wetland Solutions, LLC
Bunnlevel, North Carolina

Biological Assessment for Williamsburg Plantation Subdivision
Onslow County, North Carolina December 2012
6.8. Shortnose Sturgeon (Acipenser Brevirostrum)
Shortnose sturgeon are bottom dwellers that move from ocean waters and estuaries to freshwater rivers
between February and May. Spawning occurs in hard bottom, fast moving freshwater streams between
April and June. Juveniles remain upstream for five years (National Marine Fisheries Service, 1998).
Formal surveys were not conducted but no impacts to fish species or their habitat are expected within
the scope of this project. Additionally, the use of erosion control best management practices during the
construction phase of the project, coupled with the existence of substantial wetland areas between the
project and any potential habitat, should render any potential indirect impacts negligible.
Biological determination: No effect
6.9. West Indian Manatee (Trichechus Manatus)
This species was excluded from consideration based on consultation with US Fish and Wildlife Service
as discussed earlier.
Biological determination: No effect
7. Species Accounts — Vascular Plants
7.1. Rough- Leaved Loosestrife (Lysimachia Asperulifolia)
The Rough - leaved loosestrife (RLL) is an herbaceous, rhizomatous perennial belonging to the
Primulaceae family. It flowers from May to June with seed maturation occurring between July and
October. This species can be recognized by its 5- merous yellow flowers and its 3- whorled lanceolate
leaves that turn red in autumn.
The RLL prefers full sun and is shade intolerant. It most often occurs in the grass -shrub ecotone
between Longleaf pine upland and pond pine pocosin, especially those areas that are fire - maintained.
RLL has also been associated with other community types such as low pocosin, high pocosin, wet pine
flatwoods, pine savannah, streamhead pocosin and sandhill seep. RLL has also been found in roadside
depressions, power line rights of way and firebreaks. It prefers moist to seasonally saturated sand or
shallow organic soil over sand (USFWS, 1995) and is listed by the USDA as a wetland obligate
(USDA, 2009).
Surveys for RLL could not be conducted at the time of this biological assessment. However, surveys
were conducted for potential habitat, for RLL as well as the other three listed vascular plants described
below. Habitat ranged from unsuitable to potential habitat within power line rights of way as shown
on Figure 3.
It should be noted, the RLL was not listed as occurring within the project area in the recovery plan
published by the USFWS in 1995 (USFWS, 1995).
Biological determination: No effect
11 Wetland Solutions, LLC
Bunnlevel, North Carolina

Biological Assessment for Williamsburg Plantation Subdivision
Onslow County, North Carolina December 2012
7.2. Cooley's Meadow -Rue (Thalictrum Coolevi)
Cooley's meadow -rue is a rhizomatic perennial herb of the buttercup family (Ranunculaceae). It
normally grows to a meter in height, with stems that are erect under sunny conditions and lax, leaning
or trailing in shady conditions. Its compound leaves are divided into three leaflets, each approximately
2 cm long. The small, white flowers have no petals, but the male plant features pale yellow to white
sepals and the female plant has green sepals. The plant flowers in June to early July with fruit
maturation occurring from August to September (USFWS, 1994).
Cooley's meadow -rue is endemic to the Southeastern coastal plains with populations in North
Carolina, Georgia and Florida. Counties in North Carolina with known occurrences include
Brunswick, Columbus, Onslow and Pender. Cooley's meadow -rue occurs in moist grass -sedge bogs
and savannahs in open, frequently disturbed areas such as roadside ditches, utility line rights -of -way,
ecotones between forests and bogs, and forest clearings dominated by grasses or sedges. It is found on
circumneutral (pH near 7) fine, sandy loams that are at least seasonally saturated or moist (USFWS,
2007d).
Major threats to Cooley's meadow -rue include fire suppression, residential and commercial
development, drainage of habitat for forestry or agriculture, and direct herbicide application
(NCDENR, 2010). Based on the 5 -Year Review (USFWS, 2007d), monitoring efforts conducted up to
the date of that report are insufficient to accurately determine population trends.
Biological determination: No effect
7.3. Golden Sedge (Carex Lutea)
Golden sedge is a perennial herb of the sedge family endemic to North Carolina. It can grow a meter
in height or more and produces fertile culms with yellowish green grass -like leaves and two to four
fertile flowering spikes. The terminal spike is male and the female lateral spikes, which are normally
bright yellow in color, are subtended by bracts. The terminal male spike and the upper female spike are
sessile, while the lower lateral female spikes have peduncles (USFWS, 2010).
Golden sedge's bright yellow color helps differentiate this species from others that occur in the same
habitat. It is most readily identified from mid -April to mid -June during flowering and fruiting. Golden
sedge grows in sandy soils overlaying limestone, which produces a higher pH than is typically found in
this Coastal Plain region. Soils supporting the species are very wet to periodically shallowly
inundated. The species prefers the ecotone between pine savannas and adjacent wet hardwood or
hardwood /conifer forests. Most plants occur in the partially shaded savanna /swamp where occasional
to frequent fires favor an herbaceous ground layer (USFWS, 2010).
Other species with which this sedge grows include tulip poplar (Liriodendron tulipifera), pond cypress
(Taxodium ascendens), red maple (Acer rubrum var. trilobum), wax myrtle (Myrica cerifera var.
cerifera), colic root (Aletris farinosa), and several species of beakrush (Rhynchospora spp.). At most
sites, golden sedge shares its habitat with Cooley's meadowrue (Thalictrum cooleyi), another federally
endangered plant species, and with Thorne's beakrush (Rhynchospora thornei), a species of concern.
12 Wetland Solutions, LLC
Bunnlevel, North Carolina

Biological Assessment for Williamsburg Plantation Subdivision
Onslow County, North Carolina December 2012
All known populations of golden sedge occur in the northeast Cape Fear River watershed in Pender
and Onslow counties, North Carolina. The remaining populations of golden sedge are currently
threatened by habitat alteration including fire suppression, conversion of its limited habitat for
residential, commercial, or industrial development, highway and utility expansion, right -of -way
management with herbicides, and wetland drainage activities associated with silviculture, agriculture
and development projects (USFWS, 2010).
Biological determination: No effect
7.4. Pondberry (Lindera Melissifolia)
Pondberry is a deciduous shrub which grows approximately 6 feet high and spreads vegetatively by
stolons. Pondberry is distinguished from the two other North American members of its genus (Lindera
benzoin and L. subcoriacea) by its drooping, thin membranaceous, ovately to elliptically shaped leaves
that have a strong sassafras -like odor when crushed. Pale yellow flowers appear in early spring from
February to March, prior to leaf development. Mature fruits, which are bright red and oval- shaped, can
be found in October. The plants grow in clones of numerous stems, with young stems replacing dead
ones at the base. Thus, a mature colony usually consists of numerous dead stems along with younger
leafy ones (USFWS 1993a).
Pondberry is associated with seasonally flooded wetlands including sandy sinks, pond margins and
swampy depressions in pinelands. NC population sites have sandy soils with high peat content, a high
water table and experience frequent or intense fires (USFWS 1993a).
Biological determination: No effect
7.5. Seabeach Amaranth (Amaranthus Pumilus)
Seabeach amaranth was federally listed as threatened on April 7, 1993. It is an annual herb endemic to
Atlantic coastal plain and occurs on sand dunes and beaches, mostly on foredunes and at high tide
level. It can be many- branched, either prostrate or ascending and often forms mats. The stems are
fleshy and pink -red or reddish, with small rounded leaves that are clustered toward the tip of the stem.
Flowers and fruits are relatively inconspicuous and are borne in clusters along the stems. Flowering
begins sometimes as early as June in the Carolinas but more typically commencing in July and
continuing until their death in late fall or early winter. Seed production begins in July or August and
reaches a peak in most years in September (USFWS, 1996b).
Many threats exist, including construction of sea walls and dune fencing, development, heavy
recreational use, and off -road vehicle traffic. No suitable habitat exists within the project area.
Biological determination: No effect
A"W 13 Wetland Solutions, LLC
Bunnlevel, North Carolina

Biological Assessment for Williamsburg Plantation Subdivision
Onslow County, North Carolina
8. Project Effects
8.1. Upland & Wetland Impacts
December 2012
The property for this subdivision is 1,253 acres of undeveloped property in the city limits of
Jacksonville, NC, located in Onslow County. The property is located along the New River
approximately 1.5 miles upstream of the US -17 bridge crossing over the New River (White Oak
River Basin, 14 -digit HUC 3030001010040). The property is located immediately southwest of the
intersection of Williamsburg Parkway and Gum Branch Road (SR 1308), as shown on the project
Vicinity Map, Figure 1. Approximately 607 acres of this property, currently zoned R -7, will be
developed into a residential subdivision. The New River floodplain will remain undeveloped. The
property has not been previously developed, but accessible areas have been timbered in the last 10
years. Large portions of the project area are characterized as loblolly pine (Pious taeda)
monocultures of various ages, from five to fifty years of age, and deciduous forest in the same
range of maturity.
A Jurisdictional Determination (JD) was obtained from the Wilmington District US Army Corps of
Engineers for the project area (Action ID# 201001947, dated October 24, 2012, see Appendix F).
The project, as proposed, will result in impacts to 0.628 acres of jurisdictional forested Section 404
wetlands and 820 linear feet of streams, utilizing the current design of the development and the
road network. All of these impacts are associated with the necessary clearing of road rights -of -way
(ROW) to provide access to the proposed lots. It is estimated that 16 road crossings will occur,
resulting in the placement of 5,777 cubic yards of permanent fill materials within jurisdictional
areas and 1,315 feet of culverts for stormwater conveyance. All impacts will be mitigated through
the purchase of credits from the nearest accepted mitigation bank with credits on hand.
The applicant has requested allocation of the necessary credits from the Bachelor's Delight Swamp
Mitigation Bank. The confluence of Bachelor's Delight Swamp with the New River is located
approximately 2.5 miles upstream of the proposed project.
No Section 404 wetland /stream impacts will result from the development of individual lots. All
Section 404wetland areas on the parent tract, excluding the proposed impacts, will be placed in
permanent preservation to be administered between USACE and the property's Homeowners
Association (HOA). It should be noted that the New River floodplain lies outside of the scope of
the parent tracts' JD due to their inaccessibility beyond /west of the existing power line ROW (See
Figures 3,5). These floodplain areas, which are permanently inundated by the New River and
designated as a Significant Natural Heritage Area, will not be impacted by development or
included in the USACE preservation documents.
8.2. Proposed Mitigation
In order to mitigate for the proposed Section 404 wetland and stream impacts for this project, the
applicant has requested allocation of the necessary Section 404 wetland /stream credits from the
Bachelor's Delight Swamp Mitigation Bank. The confluence of Bachelor's Delight Swamp with
the New River is located approximately 2.5 miles upstream of the proposed project. The contact
information for this mitigation bank is listed below:
14 Wetland Solutions, LLC
Bunnlevel, North Carolina

Biological Assessment for Williamsburg Plantation Subdivision
Onslow County, North Carolina
Bachelors Delight Mitigation Bank
c/o Land Management Group, Inc.
Attn: Christian Preziosi
3805 Wrightsville Avenue, Suite 15
Wilmington, NC 28403
cpreziosi @lmgroup.net
December 2012
In addition, all Section 404 wetland areas on the parent tract, excluding the proposed impacts, will
be placed in permanent preservation to be administered between USACE and the property's
Homeowners Association (HOA). It should be noted that the New River floodplain lies outside of
the scope of the parent tracts' JD due to their inaccessibility beyond /west of the existing power line
ROW (See Figures 3,5). These floodplain areas, which are permanently inundated by the New
River and designated as a Significant Natural Heritage Area, will not be impacted by development
or included in the USACE preservation documents. A draft copy of the preservation plat and
restrictive covenants for this property is provided in Appendix F).
The USACE's policies on avoidance, minimization, and mitigation measures for jurisdictional
areas have been the primary guidance when designing the proposed subdivision. In addition, the
City of Jacksonville's Land Use Plan, Zoning Ordinance, Stormwater Ordinance, and Subdivision
Ordinance were used to identify design constraints (i.e. 750' max cul -de -sac length for fire
department turnarounds, 24% impervious area for low- density) previously determined for these
areas.
Mitigation of direct impacts during construction of the proposed project will be accomplished
through compliance with the following applicable permits: Permanent Stormwater Control permit
issued by NCDENR Division of Water Quality (Jacksonville is NPDES Phase 11 Municipality),
Erosion & Sedimentation Control permit issued by NCDENR Division of Land Resources. No
wetland /stream impacts will result from the development of individual lots due to their
preservation status.
Mitigation of secondary and cumulative impacts will be mitigated through the City of
Jacksonville's multiple ordinances that address growth and environmental issues. These
ordinances, plans, and regulations were adopted in order to minimize impacts to water, land, and
environmental resources within the City's jurisdiction that may occur as a result of anticipated
growth and development. Copies of these ordinances are available on -line, with web sites as cited
in Section 9, References. Electronic copies of these ordinances and applicable sections are included
in the pdf submittal on CD.
15 Wetland Solutions, LLC
Bunnlevel, North Carolina

Biological Assessment for Williamsburg Plantation Subdivision
Onslow County, North Carolina
8.3. Archaeological Effects
December 2012
All field work and archival research for the archaeological assessment has been completed by
Archaeological Consultants of the Carolinas, Inc. (ACC), of Clayton, NC. After compiling all of
this data, ACC has prepared the final report and submitted to SIHPO on April 2"d, 2012. This
review is ongoing and should be completed by the end of April 2012. Any comments received
from SIHPO regarding this project will be addressed and incorporated into the final BA documents,
etc.
One site of archaeological significance (Site 310N1833) has been identified as NRHP Potentially
Eligible /Un- assessed adjacent to the New River floodplain. This site is located at the extreme
southwestern corner of the property, measures 7.76 acres, and is not planned for residential
development due to its location and elevations near the 100 -year floodplain. Therefore, Site
3ION1833 will be placed in permanent preservation in order to prevent any disturbance or further
mitigation measures as recommended in the archaeological assessment. Mitigation by complete
avoidance will ensure that the Williamsburg Planation Subdivision can move forward without
pursuing a more intensive Phase II or Phase III Archaeological Survey.
8.4. Other Effects
Noise is also a potential problem with major construction activities. Due to the level of
development within the action area and the apparent absence of listed species that would be
affected by noise, noise should not have a detrimental effect within the action area of this project.
8.5. Conclusions
No protected species were detected during the biological survey for this project. While potentially
suitable habitat for the listed vascular plant species was identified as described above, we
recommend determinations of "No Effect" for the following species: eastern puma, red - cockaded
woodpecker, bald eagle, shortnose sturgeon, West Indian manatee, green sea turtle, leatherback sea
turtle, loggerhead sea turtle, piping plover, seabeach amaranth, rough - leaved loosestrife, Cooley's
meadowrue, golden sedge and pondberry,
16 Wetland Solutions, LLC
!IT01 Bunnlevel, North Carolina

Biological Assessment for Williamsburg Plantation Subdivision
Onslow County, North Carolina December 2012
9. References
National Geographic, 1987. Field Guide to the Birds of North America; 2nd ed.
Washington DC. 464 pp.
NatGeo, 2011. National Geographic Animals. Green Sea Turtle. Available online:
http: // animals. national_ geographic .com /animals /reptiles /green- turtle/ Accessed January 24, 2011.
NCDENR, 2001. NC Natural Heritage Program, Guide to Federally Listed Endangered and Threatened Species
of North Carolina. Available online: http: / /www.ncnhp.org/Pages/guide.htm
NCDENR, 2010. NC Natural Heritage Program database, Cooley's Meadowrue species profile
http: / /www.ncnhp.org/Ima_eg s /81.pdf, Accessed; November 12, 2010
National Marine Fisheries Service, 1998. Recovery Plan for the Shortnose Sturgeon
(Acipenser brevirostrum). Prepared by the Shortnose Sturgeon Recovery Team for the National
Marine Fisheries Service, Silver Spring, Maryland. 104 pages.
National Marine Fisheries Service, 2011. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Fisheries:
Office of Protected Species and National Marine Fisheries Service; Loggerhead turtle species
description; Available online: http: / /www.nmfs.noaa.gov /pr /species /turtles /loggerhead.htm
Accessed January 25, 2011.
USACE, 1987. US Army Corps of Engineers wetlands delineation manual.
Technical Report Y -87 -1, Vicksburg, MS. 100 pp.
USDA, 1992. US Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service. 1992. Soil survey of
Onslow County, North Carolina. USDA. 139 pp.
USDA, 2009. Natural Resources Conservation Service; Plants Database
Available online: http: // plants. usda .gov /java/profile ?symbol =LYAS2
US Fish and Wildlife Service, 1992. Recovery plan for leatherback turtles in the U.S. Caribbean,
Atlantic and Gulf of Mexico. National Marine Fisheries Service, Washington, D.C.
US Fish and Wildlife Service, 1993.Recovery plan for pondberry (Lindera melissifolia). USFWS,
Atlanta, GA. 43 pp.
US Fish and Wildlife Service, 1994. Cooley's meadowrue recovery plan. USFWS Atlanta, GA. 29 pp.
------------- - - - - -, 1995. Rough - leaved loosestrife (Lysimachia asperulifolia) recovery plan.
USFWS Atlanta, GA. 32 pp.
------------------- 1996a. Piping plover (Charadrius moldus) Atlantic population revised recovery plan.
USFWS, Atlanta,GA. 59 pp.
------------------- 1996b. Seabeach amaranth recovery plan. USFWS, Atlanta, GA. 59 pp.
17 Wetland Solutions, LLC
Bunnlevel, North Carolina

Biological Assessment for Williamsburg Plantation Subdivision
Onslow County, North Carolina December 2012
------------- - - - - -, 2001a. Loggerhead seat turtle species description; Available online:
http : / /www. fws. gov /northflorida/seaturtle s/ turtle %20factsheets /PDF /Loggerhead- Sea- Turtle.pdf.
Accessed November 12, 2010.
US Fish and Wildlife Service, 200 lb. Piping plover critical habitat (Final). Available online:
http: / /criticalhabitat.fws- og vhttp:Hcriticalhabitat.fws_ gov /. Accessed November 15, 2010
---- - - - - -, 2003. Recovery plan for the red - cockaded woodpecker (Picoides borealis): second revision.
USFWS, Atlanta, GA. 296 pp.
------------- - - - - -, 2007a. Threatened and Endangered Species in North Carolina. Available online:
http: // www .fws.gov /nc -es /es /countyfr.html . Accessed November 12, 2010
------------- - - - - -, 2007b. National Bald Eagle Management Guidelines; May 2007. Available online:
http: // www. fws. gov /migratoiybirdsibaldeagle.html. Accessed November 12, 2010
------------- - - - - -, 2007c. North Carolina Ecological Services; Eastern cougar (Puma concolor cougar).
Available online: http : / /www.fws.gov /nc -es /mammal /cou ate. Accessed November 12, 2010
------------- - - - - -, 2007d. Cooley's Meadowrue 5 -Year Review: Summary and Evaluation. Available online:
http://ecos.fivs.gov/docs/five year review /doc2362.pdf. Accessed: November 13, 2010.
------------- - - - - -, 2009a. US Fish and Wildlife Service, Threatened and Endangered Species Database System
(TESS). Available online: http: / /ecos.fws.gov /tess public /. Accessed January 30, 2009
------------ - - - - -- 2009b. US Fish and Wildlife Service; Red - cockaded woodpecker species profile.
available: http: // www .fws.gov /rcwrecove!3 /rcw.html Accessed November 12, 2010
------------- - - - - -, 2010. US Fish and Wildlife Service, North Carolina Ecological Services; Golden
Sedge species profile. Available online: http: // www. fws.gov /nc -es /plant/gsedge.html
Accessed November 13, 2010.
18 Wetland Solutions, LLC
Bunnlevel, North Carolina

Biological Assessment for Williamsburg Plantation Subdivision
Onslow County, North Carolina
December 2012
Biological Assessment
Williamsburg Plantation Subdivision
City of Jacksonville
Onslow County, North Carolina
Appendix A
Project Maps
• Figure 1 - Project Vicinity Map
• Figure 2 - USGS Topographic Map: Existing Parcels & Proposed Lot Layout
• Figure 3 - Potential Rough -Leaf Loosestrife Habitat
• Figure 4 - Natural Heritage Element Occurrences
• Figure 5 — Piping Plover Critical Habitat in Project Vicinity
Appendix - 1 Wetland Solutions, LLC
IT611 Bunnlevel, North Carolina

Biological Assessment for Williamsburg Plantation Subdivision
Onslow County, North Carolina December 2012
ffli nisbxirg Plantation Subdivision
Biological Assessment - Project Vicinity Map
7.5'USGS 'Topographic leap - North Jacksonviffe Quad
ERIE BEAUFORT
ZC ft PAMLI O
r
DONE
AM * bep NIft
M 19 LARTERET
LOW
13La
lawn-
Gty of Jacksonville
OLU116u �
E i
.. - a -
UN
=Project Bolan ar
10 5 0 10 20 30 40 50 60
Mile
ib* Appendix - 2 Wetland Solutions, LLC
Bunnlevel, North Carolina

Biological Assessment for Williamsburg Plantation Subdivision
Onslow County, North Carolina
December 2012
USGS Topographic Vicinity Map
North Jacksonville Quad 1:24,000
Existing Parcels & Proposed Lot Layout
0 1,000 21000 4,000 6,000 8,000 10,000 12,000 14,000 -
Feet
Gum Branch Road =�
New River •:� �r� ,1 � r:_�- iN
`�. r `.'"_ : i_,, . ` '��� • `, ''.�at Williamsburg Pkwy
ZVI IJ , •N• t'�• c�r l+
� � - � .+ � s r •- _ � w ^.' ��'y',c �• � 11..L r� �Sr •�, � ~. yY�?� ✓J � .�• �
�I - _ _. ♦ l - - ,III
rte'
I=Mact Boundary in Project Scope
Proposed Lot Layout - FUTURE
Wetland Delineation - FINAL Recorded JD
0 Previous Phases of Development
M3FIoodp lain Areas Beyond JD Scope
NOM All boundaries and distances as shown are considered approaiusate.
4 A PLS survey of delineated areas and ren-iew and approval by the
• ±� �{ r' • US. Army Corps of Engineers is required prior to specific site planning
t,
Appendix - 3 Wetland Solutions, LLC
Bunnlevel, North Carolina

Biological Assessment for Williamsburg Plantation Subdivision
Onslow County, North Carolina December 2012
NXIMianisburg Plantation Subdivision
Potential • • Loosestrife Habitat
Detailed Plant Stinrev Areas in Biological •
OF
lk
IF
ds
l
i ab
5c.
Plant Survey Areas
Existing Easements
C3Tract Boundary in Pro'ect Scope
Wedand -� - , - — - - =- -- - _- .r r•-• � '• -ice'- �;
�+
• • • • JD
Appendix - 4 Wetland Solutions, LLC
Bunnlevel, North Carolina

Biological Assessment for Williamsburg Plantation Subdivision
Onslow County, North Carolina
December 2012
`XIllliamsburg Plantation Subdivision
Onslow County, North Carolina (NC OneMap)
Natural Heritage Element Occurrences
✓i.
Ar '� rN '
Project Bou ndary `
Nattural Heritage Element Occurrences
Q Animal Assemblage
Invertebrate Animal ��i�;,w_. - - --
T �..
=Natural Coninumity t' = -
Nonvascular PlantY.,` j _
[=Vascular Plant
Vertebrate Animal "'Ofta'v—W Aar >w• r: .
Existing Parcels & Future Roads
0 4,000 8,000 15,000 24,000 32,000 40,000 48,000 56,000
Feet
Appendix - 5 Wetland Solutions, LLC
*Tb' Bunnlevel, North Carolina

Biological Assessment for Williamsburg Plantation Subdivision
Onslow County, North Carolina December 2012
Williamsburg Plantation Subdivision
Piping Plover riticai Habitat in Project Vicinity
nslow County, North Carolina
PAID
roatan National Forest
H offrrxan state Forest
DUP IN
Angola Bay
aflrxe Land Project Site
■
W-F AN
PEN
e
1:q R
IC
�� ddiwo 0 10
4
4
LOW � 0 A
ii
0
1
N
P
Camp 1xienne Marine Base
Holly Shelter Carne Lanni SP
Project Boundary
MPiping Plover Habitat
= State/ Federal Lands
20 30 411 50
Mies
Appendix - 6 Wetland Solutions, LLC
Bunnlevel, North Carolina

Biological Assessment for Williamsburg Plantation Subdivision
Onslow County, North Carolina
December 2012
Biological Assessment
Williamsburg Plantation Subdivision
City of Jacksonville
Onslow County, North Carolina
Appendix B
Photographs of Area of Study
Williamsburg Plantation
Appendix - 7 Wetland Solutions, LLC
I,,?"- Bunnlevel, North Carolina

Biological Assessment for Williamsburg Plantation Subdivision
Onslow County, North Carolina December 2012
Appendix B -1:
Appendix B -2:
Bottomland Hardwood Forest
Appendix - 8 Wetland Solutions, LLC
111711-- Bunnlevel, North Carolina

Biological Assessment for Williamsburg Plantation Subdivision
Onslow County, North Carolina December 2012
Appendix B -3:
Riverine Wetlands
Appendix B -4:
Bottomland Hardwood Forest
Appendix - 9 Wetland Solutions, LLC
Bunnlevel, North Carolina

Biological Assessment for Williamsburg Plantation Subdivision
Onslow County, North Carolina
Appendix B -5:
Bottomland Hardwood Forest
December 2012
Appendix B -6:
Pinus taeda Monoculture (ear_
fa'
Appendix - 10 Wetland Solutions, LLC
Bunnlevel, North Carolina

Archaeological Survey of Portions of the Proposed
Williamsburg Plantation Extension Tracts
Onslow County, North Carolina
ARCHAEOLOGICAL CONSULTANTS OF THE CAROLINAS, INC.
2012

Archaeological Survey of Portions of the Proposed
Williamsburg Plantation Expansion Tracts
Onslow County, North Carolina
ER 11 -0234
Prepared for
Prestige Homes, LLC
Jacksonville, North Carolina
Prepared by
Michael Keith O'Neal
Senior Archaeologist
Dawn Reid
Senior Archaeologist
Bobby Southerlin
Principal Investigator
Archaeological Consultants of the Carolinas, Inc.
2012

Management Summary
The proposed Williamsburg Plantation expansion tracts are located west of Gum Branch Road
immediately north of the Jacksonville city limits in Onslow County, North Carolina. These tracts border the
New River. In October 2011, Archaeological Consultants of the Carolinas, Inc. (ACC), conducted archival
research on and an archaeological reconnaissance of the project tracts. This reconnaissance was conducted
on behalf of Prestige Homes, LLC, with the goal of developing a Scope of Work (SOW) for subsequent Phase
I intensive archaeological survey. This SOW was reviewed and approved by the State Historic Preservation
Office (SHPO).
An intensive survey of the portions of the proposed expansion tracts delineated in the SOW was
conducted in January and February 2012. This archaeological survey focused primarily on the pronounced
bluffs along wetland margins and creek banks and on upland areas with deep, well- drained soils. The areas
investigated total approximately 314 acres. Survey consisted of the excavation of shovel tests at 30 meter
intervals along parallel transects spaced 30 meters apart. Soil profiles exposed in shovel tests varied slightly
from area to area but were generally comprised of 15 to 20 cm of dark brown or dark gray sandy loam
overlaying pale brown sandy loam. In select areas, subsoil or the water table were encountered at depths
ranging between 30 to 50 cm.
A total of 26 archaeological resources were identified during this survey. This includes those potential
sites that were identified during the reconnaissance which were relocated and fully delineated. Eleven of these
resources are archaeological sites. The remaining 15 resources are classified as isolated finds, having less than
three artifacts. These resources are summarized in Table 1. Of the archaeological sites identified and
evaluated during this survey, only one (31ON1833) is being recommended as potentially eligible /unassessed
for the NRHP. Site 31ON1833 yielded abundant temporally diagnostic ceramics dating to the Woodland
Period (BC 1000 - AD 145 0) overlaying deeply buried lithic debitage that may date to the preceding Archaic
Period (BC 8000 - 1000). None of the isolated finds meet eligibility criteria for inclusion on the NRHP.
Table 1. Archaeological Resources Documented during this Investigation.
Resource Number
Component
NRHP Eligibility Recommendation
31ON1831
Woodland Period
Not Eligible
31ON1832
Middle Woodland Period
Not Eligible
31ON1833
Early - Late Woodland Periods
Potentially Eligible /Unassessed
31ON1834
Woodland Period
Not Eligible
31ON1835
Woodland Period
Not Eligible
31ON1836
Middle Woodland Period
Not Eligible
31ON1837
Middle Woodland Period
Not Eligible
31ON1838
Early Woodland Period
Not Eligible
1310N1839
Middle Woodland Period
Not Eligible
11

31ON1840
Middle Woodland Period
Not Eligible
31ON1841
Middle Woodland Period
Not Eligible
Isolate 3 ION 1842
Woodland Period
Not Eligible
Isolate 31ON1843
Unknown Prehistoric
Not Eligible
Isolate 3 ION 1844
Unknown Prehistoric
Not Eligible
Isolate 31ON1845
Unknown Prehistoric
Not Eligible
Isolate 3 ION 1846
Unknown Prehistoric
Not Eligible
Isolate 3 ION 1847
Unknown Prehistoric
Not Eligible
Isolate 31ON1848
Unknown Prehistoric
Not Eligible
Isolate 31ON1849
Woodland Period
Not Eligible
Isolate 31ON1850
Woodland Period
Not Eligible
Isolate 31ON1851
Unknown Prehistoric
Not Eligible
Isolate 31ON1852
Woodland Period
Not Eligible
Isolate 31ON1853
Unknown Prehistoric
Not Eligible
Isolate 31ON1854 **
Unknown Historic
Not Eligible
Isolate 31ON1855 **
Unknown Historic
Not Eligible
Isolate 31ON1856
Unknown Prehistoric
Not Eligible
III

Table of Contents
Page
Management Summary ................................. .............................ii
Listof Figures ...................................... ............................... v
Listof Tables . .................................... ............................... vi
Chapter 1. Introduction and Methods of Investigation ..... ............................... 1
Introduction..................... ............................... 1
Tract Description ................. ............................... 1
Methods of Investigation .......................................... 3
Chapter 2. Environmental and Cultural Overviews ....... ............................... 7
Environmental Overview .......................................... 7
Cultural Overview ............... ............................... 10
History of the Project Tract ....................................... 19
Chapter 3. Results of Investigation .................. ............................... 21
Background Research Results ....... ............................... 21
Field Investigation Results ......... ............................... 21
Chapter 4. Discussion and Recommendations .......... ............................... 42
ReferencesCited ................................... ............................... 43
Appendix A. Artifact Catalog and Projectile Point Report
Appendix B. Resume of Principal Investigator
1V

List of Figures
Page
Figure 1.
Map showing project location in Onslow County ...............................
1
Figure 2.
General view of the pine and hardwood forest in the project tract ...................
2
Figure 3.
View of the transmission line and wetland in the project tract ......................
2
Figure 4.
Map showing the Williamsburg Plantation expansion tract and areas of high
potential for archaeological remains ......... ...............................
4
Figure 5.
Physiographic provinces of North Carolina .... ...............................
7
Figure 6.
Map of the White Oak River Basin showing the location of the project area...........
8
Figure 7.
Soil map for the Williamsburg Plantation expansion tracts ........................
9
Figure 8.
Map showing the Williamsburg Plantation expansion tracts and identified
archaeological resources ...............................................
22
Figure 9.
Plan map of site 31ON1831 .............. ...............................
23
Figure 10.
Plan map of site 31ON1832 .............. ...............................
25
Figure 11.
Plan map of site 31ON1833 .............. ...............................
26
Figure 12.
Plan map of site 31ON1834 .............. ...............................
29
Figure 13.
Plan map of site 31ON1835 .............. ...............................
30
Figure 14.
Plan map of site 31ON1836 .............. ...............................
32
Figure 15.
Plan map of site 31ON1837 .............. ...............................
34
Figure 16.
Plan map of site 31ON1838 .............. ...............................
36
Figure 17.
Plan map of site 31ON1839 .............. ...............................
37
Figure 18.
Plan map of site 3 ION 1840 .............. ...............................
38
Figure 19.
Plan map of site 3 ION 1841 .............. ...............................
39
v

List of Tables
Page
Table 1.
Archaeological Resources Documented during this Investigation ...................
ii
Table 2.
Summary of Soils Present in the Williamsburg Plantation Expansion Tracts .........
10
Table 3.
Native American Chronology for the Southern North Carolina Coast ...............
11
Table 4.
Summary of Artifacts Recovered from 31ON1832 ............................
24
Table 5.
Summary of Artifacts Recovered from 31ON1833 ............................
27
Table 6.
Summary of Artifacts Recovered from 31ON1836 ............................
31
Table 7.
Summary of Artifacts Recovered from 31ON1837 ............................
34
Table 8.
Summary of Artifacts Recovered from 31ON1838 ............................
35
Table 9.
Summary of Isolated Finds Identified in the Williamsburg Expansion Tracts.........
40
vi

Chapter 1. Introduction and Methods of Investigation
Introduction
In October 2011, Archaeological
Consultants of the Carolinas, Inc. (ACC),
conducted archival research on and an
archaeological reconnaissance of the
Williamsburg Plantation expansion tracts in
Jacksonville, North Carolina (Figure 1). This
reconnaissance was conducted on behalf of
Prestige Homes, LLC, with the goal of
developing a Scope of Work (SOW) for
subsequent Phase I intensive archaeological
survey. This SOW was reviewed and
approved by the State Historic Preservation
Office (SHPO). An intensive survey of the
portions of the proposed expansion tracts
delineated in the SOW was conducted in
January and February 2012.
Tract Description
The proposed Williamsburg
Plantation expansion tracts are located west
of Gum Branch Road immediately north of
r,
Hii EIl- �tius'-- HOFMANN FOREST
Pumpkin i
RICHLANDS Center
Half
1
Min
`— WHITEOAK
JACKSONVILLE Piny',
JACKSONVILLE Crern
SWANSI10110
s
SWANS.
BORO
DNS DW _
CAMP LEJHINE
STUMP SOUND
—r
inrady Ferry
HOLLY Y[wri4
FUTGE TOPSAIL BEA' I
TOWNSHIP
Crows D— ipmalcd PIa, Gt ru
t7n.rlrm
n a n < ] u hick+ $m
the Jacksonville city limits in Onslow County, Figure 1. Map showing project location in Onslow
North Carolina. These tracts border the New County.
River. Nearly 30 percent of the acreage in the
project tracts is delineated wetlands. This
includes marsh associated with the New River and smaller waterways that extend in the tracts (Figure 2).
Topographically, one of the most significant features of these tracts are pronounced bluff lines along most of
the high - ground/marsh margin. In the northern tract, shovel testing identified deep, well- drained sandy soils
along the bluff, particularly in those areas overlooking the New River floodplain. These uplands are
characterized by a mixed pine and hardwood forest (Figure 2). The southern tract is similar to the northern
tract in that it, too, has a prominent bluff line along the New River floodplain. However, the southern tract also
has a prominent bluff margin bordering a tributary of the New River. Although this tributary is unnamed on
project maps, local informants refer to it as Royal Creek. Old logging roads, hunting trails, and a transmission
line (Figure 3) extend through all portions of the project tract.
1

Figure 2. General view of the pine and hardwood forest in the project tract.
Figure 3. View of the transmission line and wetland in the project tract.
2
JJ
f�.
VI
�._
_ � 4 1. w4'4���'ti
- C.L���
f••
l N�
aa:
Figure 2. General view of the pine and hardwood forest in the project tract.
Figure 3. View of the transmission line and wetland in the project tract.
2

Methods of Investigation
Archival research on the project area was conducted prior to the instigation of field work. This
research consisted of a review of archaeological site forms, maps, and reports on file at the Office of State
Archaeology (OSA) in Raleigh. This review served to identify previously recorded resources in the project
vicinity. A review of seventeenth and eighteenth century land grants was also conducted at the North Carolina
State Archives, also in Raleigh. Historic maps of Onslow County and the project vicinity were obtained from
a wide variety of published and online sources. These maps were used to determine past land use, the possible
presence of structural remains or historic landscape features. A review of records at the Jacksonville
Courthouse and Tax Assessor's Office was conducted to determine the chain -of -title of the project tract.
Onslow County soil data was retrieved from the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) online
depository. Finally, consultations were held with a number of individuals knowledgeable about the project
area, including Ms. Lisa Whitman -Grice (Director of the Onslow County Museum) and Mr. Dennis Jones
( Onslow County Museum Historian).
The field reconnaissance consisted of a combination of walkover and limited shovel testing. Roads,
trails, sewer lines, and power lines provided good access to many different settings within the tracts, and
provided areas of disturbances that facilitated ground surface observations. On landforms that appeared to
have high potential for the presence of archaeological deposits, judgementally placed shovel tests were
excavated.
Based on the results of the archival research and field reconnaissance, a Scope of Work (SOW) was
developed to facilitate Phase I archaeological survey. Per this SOW, the Phase I survey would focus on the
pronounced bluffs along wetland margins and creek banks in both tracts. Survey of selected areas of high
ground surrounded by wetlands would also be conducted. The areas recommended for intensive examination
totaled approximately 314 acres are shown in Figure 4. This SOW was reviewed and approved by the State
Historic Preservation Office (SHPO).
Phase I Archaeological Survey
The intensive Phase I archaeological survey of the areas defined during the field reconnaissance was
conducted in January 2012. Survey consisted of the excavation of shovel tests at 30 meter intervals along
parallel transects spaced 30 meters apart. All shovel tests measured at least 30 cm in diameter. All test fill
was screened through 0.25 inch mesh, and each test was excavated to sterile subsoil or until the water table
was encountered. Shovel testing was supplemented by comprehensive examination of all exposed ground
surface, such as roads. Data on the soil stratigraphy, artifact content, and overall integrity ofthe deposits were
recorded in field notebooks. Artifacts were collected and placed in plastic bags labeled with the date, field site
number, grid point locations (i.e., shovel test /transect or north/east coordinate), depth of artifacts, and initials
of the excavator.
A site is defined as an area containing more than two artifacts of a possible single occupation in a 30
meter or less diameter of surface exposure, or where surface or subsurface cultural features are present.
Artifacts and/or features less than 50 years in age would not be considered a site without a specific research
or management reason. Locations with fewer than three artifacts and no features are classified as isolated finds
or isolates. Although isolates are rarely considered to meet NRHP eligibility criteria, their locations and
settings are documented.
3

'Subsea, jj
{
4a+' 22:14 aC. �3 4.45 ac. 6-24 ac,
ac.
r�
? s
- •�- ... w- - �-� . i -: � ���� °.¢�' � 'rte
59.81 ac.
18.49 ac -
rf
At-
12.9
1
28 s
+88 act �
r � 52.6 ac.
row a k
Williamsburg Plantation Survey
a
Y - Project Parcels
NC
High Potential
1'100 900 .2la
rl _
MOM
Figure 4. Map showing the Williamsburg Plantation expansion tracts and areas of recommended for
intensive archaeological survey (1997 Jacksonville North, NC USGS 7.5 minute topographic
quadrangle).
E

To delineate archaeological resources, shovel tests were excavated at 15 meter intervals in cardinal
directions from the original artifact - bearing location. Each shovel test was approximately 30 cm in diameter.
Shovel test fill was screened through 0.25 inch wire mesh. Details of artifacts, soils, and possible features were
recorded in field notebooks. Artifacts were collected and placed in plastic bags labeled with the date, field site
number, grid point locations (i.e., transect /shovel test or north/east coordinate), depth of artifacts, and initials
of the excavator.
Site settings were photographed with a digital camera. Plan maps of each site showing the locations
of shovel tests and surface finds were produced in the field. The locations of each site were recorded using a
Trimble Pathfinder Global Positioning System (GPS) unit; the locations were then relayed onto project maps.
Site significance is based on the site's ability to contribute to our understanding of past lifeways, and
its subsequent eligibility for listing on the NRHP. Department of Interior regulations (36 CFR Part 60)
established criteria which must be met for an archaeological site or historic resource to be considered
significant, or eligible for the NRHP (Townsend et al. 1993). Under these criteria, a site can be defined as
significant if it retains integrity of "location, design, setting, materials, workmanship, feeling, and association"
and if it A) is associated with events that have made a significant contribution to the broad pattern of history;
B) is associated with the lives of persons significant in the past; C) embodies distinctive characteristics of a
type, period, or method of construction, or represents work of a master, possesses high artistic values, or
represents a significant and distinguishable entity whose components may lack individual distinction; or D) has
yielded, or is likely to yield, information important in history or prehistory. Archaeological sites are most
frequently evaluated pursuant to Criterion D. However, some historic period archaeological sites can be
considered under all four criteria.
The primary goals of this field investigation were to identify archaeological resources and evaluate
their potential research value or significance. Although the final determination of the site significance is made
by the State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO), whenever possible, sufficient data were gathered to allow
us to make a significance recommendation. Sites that exhibited little or no further research potential are
recommended ineligible for the NRHP and no further investigation would be proposed. Sites for which
insufficient data could be obtained at the survey level are considered unassessed and preservation or more in-
depth investigation would be advocated. It is rare for ample data to be recovered at the survey level of
investigation to definitively determine that a site meets NRHP eligibility criteria. However, when this occurs,
the site is recommended eligible for the NRHP. Again, preservation of the resource would be advocated. If
preservation is not possible, mitigation options (e.g., data recovery) would need to be considered.
Laboratory Analysis
Laboratory work begins with washing all recovered artifacts. A provenience number, based on the
context of the artifact (i.e., surface or subsurface), is assigned to each positive shovel test location or surface
collection area. Within each provenience, each individual artifact or artifact class is then assigned a number.
Artifacts are cataloged based on specific morphological characteristics such as material in the case of lithics,
and decoration and temper type in the case of prehistoric ceramics. Artifact descriptions, counts, and weights
are recorded. All diagnostic and cross - mended artifacts are labeled with a solution of Acryloid B -72 and acid -
free permanent ink.

At the conclusion ofthis project, all project related material, including field notes, artifacts, and project
maps, will be prepared for curation based on standards set forth in 36 CFR 79 ( Curation of Federally Owned
and Administered Archaeological Collections: Final Rule) and in the OSA curation guidelines. These
standards and guidelines require that all project - related material be placed in archivally stable storage bags and
boxes. Upon acceptance of the final project report by the SHPO, the project material will be submitted to OSA
for permanent curation.
Report Preparation
Report preparation involved the compilation of all data gathered during the previous tasks. The
following chapter provides environmental and cultural overviews for the project area. Next, the results of the
field investigation are discussed. Each identified site is described, shown on project maps, and NRHP
eligibility recommendations are advanced. The data obtained through laboratory analysis are included in site
descriptions. Finally, a summary ofthe overall project is presented along with management recommendations,
as appropriate.
I

Chapter 2. Environmental and Cultural Overviews
In an attempt to interpret cultural resources, it is necessary to understand the larger context within
which they occur. The natural environment, technological development, and ideological values are all
intertwined in shaping the way humans live. In this chapter, details about the local environment and cultural
development in the region are presented to provide a context within which cultural resources can be assessed.
This basic framework is an important tool in evaluating the National Register of Historic Places (NRHP)
eligibility of these resources.
Environmental Overview
Onslow County is located in the lower Coastal Plain of North Carolina (Figure 5). Elevation in the
county ranges from sea level to 19 meters above sea level at the town of Richlands (Barnhill 1992). Within
the survey tract, the elevation is between 0 and 35 feet above sea level.
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
Physiographic Provinces
TIDEWATER
BLUE RIDUE
roj
r �
L.....
PIEDMONT 'f
MIDDLE AND UPPER
COASTAL PLAIN
NQ131 HCAROLINA IANTERI UA
GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION & ANALYSIS jjPd
Se7 _ `_•t' ln.± Miles L�
Auguar 19£17
Figure 5. Physiographic provinces of North Carolina.
Onslow County is located in the South Coastal Plain climatic subregion. The climate of the project
region is subtropical, with mild winters and hot, humid summers. The average high summer temperature is
89 degrees Fahrenheit (F). The average winter high temperature is 56 degrees F. Annual precipitation is
approximately 53 inches (Clements 1988).

The project area falls within the White Oak River Basin. Onslow County contains two major drainages
within the White Oak River Basin: the New River and the White Oak River (Figure 6). The New River runs
due south through the county and is distinguished as the only river in the continental United States with its
headwaters and mouth in the same county ( Onslow County On -line [OCO] 2006). The New River forms the
western boundary of the project tract. The White Oak River forms the northern border of Onslow County.
OUPi 1N f
Richlands
General Map of the White Oak River Basin
JONES PAMLICO
ONSLOw
p�je&q a Jacksonville
PENDER
legend
ONY *Phan 101kdaN
�] StGG all 1—dary
Cw.}• I— ry
"'n wg op Iy
nnkvalmr
A.
CARrEREr
03 -05 -U7
North Topsail Beach
. r Emerald Islo ; -> 0
�
10 0 70 20 30 rlWfer
V
W +{
ATA
NCDENR
Planning 13 ranch
Sasintade & Estuary Plarming Urat
October 22, 2001
Figure 6. Map of the White Oak River Basin showing the location of the project area.
Soils
There are nine soil types present in the Williamsburg Plantation tract (Figure 7; Table 2). These soil
types are typically level to gently sloping (0 -6% slope) with the exception of Marvyn loamy fine sand, which
has a slope range of 6 to 15 percent. The soils in the tract typically form on marine terraces, although Dorovan
muck forms on floodplains. Three of the soils types ( Dorovan, Lynchburg, and Torhunta) are poorly drained.
The remaining six soils types are moderately well to well- drained. A small portion (0.7 %) of the project tract
is classified as water. These areas form the southeast tract boundary (United States Department of Agriculture
[USDA] 2012).
8
CRAVEN
UJ -U5
-04 .�- - -- '- --
Maysville
Atlantic
Newport
!
.a
Peletier t` Morehead City
Jy
c
swansboro
Caperet Sward
Beaufort
Cedar PointI-
8ogue Bague
A
03 -05 -05
03 -05 -U7
North Topsail Beach
. r Emerald Islo ; -> 0
�
10 0 70 20 30 rlWfer
V
W +{
ATA
NCDENR
Planning 13 ranch
Sasintade & Estuary Plarming Urat
October 22, 2001
Figure 6. Map of the White Oak River Basin showing the location of the project area.
Soils
There are nine soil types present in the Williamsburg Plantation tract (Figure 7; Table 2). These soil
types are typically level to gently sloping (0 -6% slope) with the exception of Marvyn loamy fine sand, which
has a slope range of 6 to 15 percent. The soils in the tract typically form on marine terraces, although Dorovan
muck forms on floodplains. Three of the soils types ( Dorovan, Lynchburg, and Torhunta) are poorly drained.
The remaining six soils types are moderately well to well- drained. A small portion (0.7 %) of the project tract
is classified as water. These areas form the southeast tract boundary (United States Department of Agriculture
[USDA] 2012).
8

- - t
Al
,r
M1�'1� iy r arm 39
Figure 7. Soil map for the Williamsburg Plantation expansion tracts (USDA 2012; 1997 Jacksonville
North, NC USGS 7.5 minute topographic quadrangles).
9
]1r k
hw
jp
Tye` IN
Williamsburg Plantation Survey
Project Tracts =Survey Area
tr
rf L
Soil Type
e~
yr _ } •
� ty
,� Baym soda SM sandy loam - Ly9eh6ury Fr*sondy loam
Craven hna sandy loam ®r marnn loamy Ime sand
-
lllllll■ ft.tly, Me,and
1`
Dorown muG'�
�10- - �� — _ Godworo loamy fim nand - fo•nunia fine sandy loam
/4• �
•
i
— �_ - t - ppd*oro-Vfban Land ComvlaK ® Waur
S
• [ a : •
%� "—`�\ �..
�� 4 "•� 0 ia] eou 1.200
1.600
Mesas
Figure 7. Soil map for the Williamsburg Plantation expansion tracts (USDA 2012; 1997 Jacksonville
North, NC USGS 7.5 minute topographic quadrangles).
9

Table 2. Summary of Soils Present in the Williamsburg Plantation Expansion Tracts (USDA 2012).
Soil Type
Characteristics
Percent
Covera e
Baymeade fine sandy loam
well - drained, 0 -6% slope, forms on ridges on marine terraces
36.1
Craven fine sandy loam
moderately well drained, 14% slope, forms on flats and ridges
on marine terraces
2.5
Dorovan muck
very poorly drained, 0 -1% slope, forms on floodplains
29.5
Goldsboro fine sandy loam
moderately well drained, 0 -2% slope, forms on flats and broad
interstream divides on marine terraces
0.9
Goldsboro -Urban land complex
moderately well drained, 0 -5% slope, forms on flats and broad
interstream divides on marine terraces
0.1
Lynchburg fine sandy loam
somewhat poorly drained, 0 -2% slope, forms on flats and broad
interstream divides on marine terraces
5.2
Marvyn loamy fine sand
well - drained, 6 -15% slope, forms on ridges on marine terraces
9.9
Pactolus fine sand
moderately well drained, 0 -2% slope, forms on ridges on marine
terraces
14.5
Torhunta fine sandy loam
very poorly drained, 0 -2 % slope, forms on flats and Carolina
Bays on marine terraces and depressions on stream terraces
0.7
water
-
0.6
Cultural Overview
Prehistoric Overview
The various periods of human settlement are characterized pri marily by technological distinctions, but
social organizations also helped inhabitants adapt to their surroundings. These technological and social
classifications are used to divide prehistory into distinctive time periods. Table 3 provides a brief chronology
of Native American occupation of the project region based on previous research done by Coe (1964), Herbert
and Mathis (1996), Hargrove and Eastman (1997), Ward and Davis (1999), and others.
Paleoindian Period (12,000 - 8, 000 BC)
The Paleoindian Period refers to the earliest human occupations ofthe New World, the origins and age
of which remain a subject of debate. The most accepted theory dates the influx of migrant bands of hunter -
gatherers to approximately 12,000 years ago. This time period corresponds to the exposure of a land bridge
connecting Siberia to the North American continent during the last ice age (Driver 1998; Jackson et al. 1997).
Research conducted over the past few decades has begun to cast doubt on this theory.
10

Table 3. Native American Chronology for the Southern North Carolina Coast.
Temporal
Phase
Diagnostic Artifacts
Settlement
Subsistence
Period
Paleoindian
Clovis
small, seasonal camps
intensive foraging,
(10,000 -8,000 BC)
large, fluted lanceolate projectile
focus on large fauna
points /knives
Dalton
Archaic
Taylor
side - notched projectile points
larger, seasonal camps,
intensive foraging
(8,000 -1,000 BC)
Kirk /Palmer
corner -- notched projectile points
base camps
Lecroy
Morrow Mtn.
stemmed points
Guilford
—
large Savannah River Points
first shell middens in the
use of marine
—
Savannah
River
Stallings Island fiber tempered and Thoms
Carolinas
resources
Creek sand tempered ceramics in southern
part of NC coast
Woodland
Hamps
Limestone /marl tempered pottery, triangular
intensive foraging
(1,000 BC- 1450 AD)
Landing
points
supplemented by
horticulture,
agriculture, continued
New River
large triangular points (Roanoke
small, dispersed villages,
focus on shellfish
Triangular)
focus on flood plain
sand tempered pottery
areas
cord marked surface treatments
flexed burials and
Hanover
grog tempered ceramics w/a variety of
cremations
surface decorations
Cape Fear
sand tempered ceramics w/ fabric and cord
large, permanent
European trade
marked surface decorations, small triangular
villages, deer skin trade
intensive agriculture,
projectile points
focus remains on
--------------
corn; supplemented
___________
by European grains
White Oak
shell tempered ceramics w /various surface
Tuscarora War
decorations
Investigations at Paleoindian sites have produced radiocarbon dates predating 12,000 years. The
Monte Verde site in South America has been dated to 10,500 BC (Dillehay 1997; Meltzer et al. 1997). In
North America, the Meadowcroft Rockshelter in Pennsylvania had deposits dating to 9,500 BC. Current
research conducted at the Topper Site indicates occupations dating between 15,000 to 19,000 (or more) years
ago (Goodyear 2006). Two sites, 44SM37 and Cactus Hill, in Virginia have yielded similar dates. One
contentious point about these early sites is that the occupations predate what has been recognized as the earliest
New World culture, Clovis. Artifacts identified at pre - Clovis sites include flake tools and blades, prismatic
blades, bifaces, and lanceolate -like points (Adovasio et al. 1998; Goodyear 2006; Johnson 1997; McAvoy and
McAvoy 1997; and McDonald 2000).
11

The major artifact marker for the Clovis period is the Clovis lanceolate fluted point (Gardner 1974,
1989; Griffin 1967). First identified in New Mexico, Clovis fluted points have been recovered throughout the
United States. However, most of the identified Clovis points have been found in the eastern United States
(Ward and Davis 1999). Most Clovis points have been recovered from surface contexts, although some sites
(e.g., Cactus Hill and Topper sites) have contained well - defined subsurface Clovis contexts.
The identification ofpre - Clovis sites, higher frequencies of Clovis points on the east coast ofthe United
States (the opposing side of the continent where the land bridge was exposed during the last glaciation), and
the lack of predecessors to the Clovis point type have led some researchers to hypothesize other avenues ofNew
World migration (Bonnichsen et al. 2006). These alternative migration theories contend that the influx of
people to the Americas occurred prior to the ice -free corridor 12,000 years ago and that multiple migration
episodes took place. These theories include overland migrations similar to the one presumed to have occurred
over the Bering land bridge and water migrations over both the Atlantic Ocean and the Pacific rim ( Stanford
et al. 2006). Coastal migration theories envision sea faring people using boats to make the journey, evidence
for which has not been identified (Adovasio and Page 2002).
In the southeastern United States, Clovis was followed by smaller fluted and non -fluted lanceolate
spear points, such as Dalton and Hardaway point types, that are characteristic of the later Paleoindian Period
(Goodyear 1982). The Hardaway point, first described by Coe (1964), is seen as a regional variant of Dalton
(Oliver 1985; Ward 1983).
Most Paleoindian materials occur as isolated surface finds in the eastern United States (Ward and
Davis 1999); this indicates to many scholars that population density was extremely low during this period and
that groups were small and highly mobile (Meltzer 1988). It has been noted that group movements were
probably well - scheduled and that some semblance of territories was probably maintained to ensure adequate
arrangements for procuring mates and maintaining population levels (Anderson and Hanson 1988).
O'Steen (1996) analyzed Paleoindian settlement patterns in the Oconee River valley in northeastern
Georgia and noted a pattern of decreasing mobility throughout the Paleoindian period. Sites of the earliest
portion of the period seem to be restricted to the floodplains, while later sites were distributed widely in the
uplands, showing an exploitation of a wider range of environmental resources. If this pattern holds true for
the Southeast in general, it may be a result of changing environments trending toward increased deciduous
forest and decreasing availability of Pleistocene megafauna and the consequent increased reliance on smaller
mammals for subsistence; population growth may have also been a factor.
Archaic Period (8, 000 -1, 000 BC)
The Archaic period has been the focus of considerable research in the Southeast. However, for the
Coastal area of North Carolina, much data are still needed to refine the chronology and gain a better
understanding of subsistence strategies and site size and function of Archaic time period. Most of what is
known ofthis time period comes from surface collections (Ward and Davis 1999). The chronological sequence
defined by Coe (1964) for the Archaic North Carolina Piedmont is applicable to the Coast and Coastal Plain.
12

Early Archaic (8,000 - 6, 000 BC). The Early Archaic period is marked by a shift from a boreal forest
to more northern hardwoods. Southern pines became the dominant species as the Oak - Hickory forest retreated
to the Piedmont ( Delcourt and Delcourt 1981; Delcourt and Delcourt 1985). Site types are generally of two
kinds: base camps at stream confluences and small temporary procurement sites located in areas with
seasonally variable resources (Phelps 1981, 1983; Ward and Davis 1999). The smaller temporary procurement
camps and the larger base camps are found at a ratio of ten to one (Ward and Davis 1999). Palmer and Kirk
corner - notched spear points are diagnostic of the time period.
Middle Archaic (6,000 -3, 000 BC). Settlement and subsistence strategy remained constant through
the Middle Archaic, although there is a noted increase in site frequency (Ward and Davis 1999). Stanly
Stemmed, Morrow Mountain Stemmed, and Guilford Lanceolate spear points are the primary diagnostic
artifacts ofthis time period. Morrow Mountain and Guilford phases are believed to have been introduced from
the west (Coe 1964). Phelps (1964) referred to this as the "Western Intrusive horizon." Halifax projectile
points have also been found in the north Coastal Plain of North Carolina. These points date to approximately
4,000 BC and were introduced from peoples living to the north (Coe 1964).
Late Archaic (3, 000 -1, 000 BC). This time period marks a shift of settlements from upland tributary
streams to the mouths of major rivers. This shift allowed native peoples to include marine and estuarine
resources in their diet. The predominant characteristic tool type of the Late Archaic is the Savannah River
spear point. These large points are stemmed with triangular blades and may have been used as knives as well
as spear points.
The earliest well dated ceramic types in the Southeast are fiber tempered Stallings wares and the sand
tempered Thorns Creek wares and are found primarily in the coastal regions of South Carolina and Georgia.
Stallings and Thorns Creek wares have been recovered from sites in the coastal plain of North Carolina.
Stallings sherds have been found as far north as the Tar River drainages and sand tempered Thorns Creek
wares tend to be limited to Brunswick and New Hanover counties (Ward and Davis 1999). These ceramics
tend to be found in association with Late Archaic Savannah River phase contexts, leading some researchers
to date them to Late Archaic Period (Sassaman 1993). However, many North Carolina archaeologists see the
introduction of ceramic technology as a hallmark of the Woodland Period.
Woodland Period (1, 000 BC -1450 AD)
A transition between the preceramic Archaic cultures and the Woodland cultures has been identified
by Oliver (1985). Stemmed point types continue and are represented by the Gypsy/Thelma /Swannanoa point
types in the Early Woodland subperiod (1,000 BC -300 AD). Throughout much ofthe southeast, the Woodland
Period represents a time of technological and social change preceding the Mississippian Period, which is
marked by chiefdoms and agricultural -based subsistence. "Mississippianization" of local groups is not
recognized in much of coastal North Carolina. Consequently, the Woodland Period extended to the early
eighteenth century, a period of close contact between Native Americans and Europeans.
13

Early Woodland (1, 000 BC - 300 BC). Along the North Carolina coast, Early Woodland sites consist
of shell middens near tidal marshes and ceramic and/or lithic scatters in different environmental zones. Site
type categories established by Trinkley (1990) for this portion of the state include seasonal camps located in
upland settings at springs or stream confluences, small seasonal campsites located on swamp edges, and large
semipermanent camps on swamp edges. Site location patterns suggest a dispersed, highly mobile lifeway that
continued from the Late Archaic into the Woodland.
Two ceramic types are associated with the Early Woodland along the southern coast ofNorth Carolina.
New River ceramics are coarse sand tempered and exhibit surface treatments that are dominated by cord
marking, but also include fabric impressing, net impressing, and simple stamping (Loftfield 1975; Mathis 1999;
Ward and Davis 1999). Hamps Landing ceramics are characterized by limestone or marl temper and have
plain, faint thong marked, cord marked, fabric impressed, and simple stamped surfaces (Ward and Davis
1999).
The Hamp's Landing ceramic series was identified in the mid- 1990s. At the Hamps Landing site
(31NH142), these wares were recovered from strata also containing Thorns Creek ceramics. At the Topsail
Island site (31 ON 190), charcoal obtained from a pit feature containing Hamps Landing ceramics dated to 1945
BC, suggesting that Hamps Landing ceramics were contemporaneous with Thorns Creek wares (Ward and
Davis 1999). The dating of Hamps Landing wares remains controversial. The radiocarbon date obtained from
the Topsail Island site was questioned even by the site archaeologists. Jones and his colleagues felt that the
Hamps Landing wares were more similar to Hanover than to Thorns Creek ceramics (Jones et al. 1997).
Hargrove (1993) has suggested that the stratigraphic position of the Hamps Landing ceramics at the Hamps
Landing site falls within an Early to Middle Woodland transition period rather than into the Late Archaic
period.
Middle Woodland (300 BC -1000 AD). Sites dating to this period include small single house shell
middens, more significant shell middens, and shell -less sites in the interior that vary in size and artifact density.
Trinkley (1990) notes that the site types from Early Woodland continue into the Middle Woodland but with
the addition of sand burial mounds. By this time, the bow and arrow had been introduced as reflected in the
occurrence of small triangular points. Settlements became more permanent and sand burial mounds begin to
occur in coastal regions. The low, sand burial mounds have been identified at several archaeological sites in
the region. Estuarine resources made a significant contribution to the subsistence of Middle Woodland peoples,
but whether the sites were permanent or seasonal is not clearly understood (Drucker and Jackson 1984;
Espenshade and Brockington 1989; Trinkley 1976, 1980). Domestic plants also became a more important part
of the diet (Ward and Davis 1999).
The two ceramic series associated with the Middle Woodland in the southern coastal plain are the grog
tempered Hanover wares and the sand tempered Cape Fear wares. Hanover wares are typically cord marked
or fabric impressed (Ward and Davis 1999). Cape Fear ceramics have similar decorations, although South
(1976) observed rare net impressing on these wares (Ward and Davis 1999).
14

Late Woodland (AD 1000 - 1450). Sand burials continued to be used during the Late Woodland with
burials generally being secondary and bundled. Cremations or charred remains are common (Jones et al. 1997).
House structures include both circular and rectangular outlines but it is unclear whether the two house styles
indicate seasonal differences or the presence of Algonquin speakers in the area (Loftfield 1990; Mathis 1995).
The Late Woodland in the southern Coastal Plain of North Carolina is characterized by the White Oak Phase.
South (1976), working in Brunswick and New Hanover counties, described the "Oak Island" series as being
shell tempered pottery that included cord marked, net impressed, fabric impressed, and plain surface treatments.
Working near the White Oak River, South (1962) identified shell tempered fabric impressed sherds that he
defined as White Oak fabric impressed. Loftfield (1976) expanded the definition of White Oak to include
simple stamped and smoothed surfaces based on work conducted in Onslow and Carteret County. Few
researchers, today, distinguish between South's "Oak Island" and Loftfield's "White Oak" ceramic series
(Ward and Davis 1999). However, it is believed by some that many of the shell tempered Oak Island sherds
identified by South (1976) are actually limestone tempered and part of the Early Woodland Hamps Landing
series, and that the term White Oak should be used to define the shell tempered Oak Island ceramics (Ward and
Davis 1999).
Historic Overview
After Colombus's venture to the New World, the Spanish, French, and English all made strong efforts
to colonize and explore the land, including the areas that make up the Carolinas today. In 1524, Giovanni de
Verrazzano explored the Carolina coast under the service of King Frances I of France. He anchored his ship,
La Dauphine near Cape Fear and was probably the first European to land on Brunswick County soil. Two
years later the Spaniard, Luis Vasquez de Ayllon, led an expedition to the same spot and moved further down
the river where he made an unsuccessful attempt at a settlement. It was not until 1584 that more settlers
returned, this time the English. Sir Walter Raleigh had been granted a charter by Queen Elizabeth to establish
colonies in the New World. Many attempts failed, including the famous "lost colony" of Roanoke. He lost
his charter, but a group of his former associates secured another, the Virginia charter, and went on to establish
Jamestown in 1607, the first permanent settlement in the Americas (Powell 1989).
The disastrous mismanagement and resulting loss of life in Virginia during the first two decades ofthe
colony's existence resulted in the revocation of the Virginia Company's charter in 1624 (Noel Hume 1994).
In 1663, King Charles II chartered the Province of Carolina to eight Lords Proprietors. Shortly after, in 1664,
the province was divided into three precincts: Albemarle, Bath, and Clarendon (Corbitt 2000). The area that
now represents Onslow County was in Bath, where settlers under the leadership of William Hilton from
Massachusetts colonized as early as 1663 (Corbitt 2000).
Tensions grew between the European settlers and the natives, and soon the Chowanoc War began in
1675. Natives were no match for colonists with firearms, and after a couple of years the Chowanoc were
forced onto a reservation in Gates County (Ward and Davis 1999). Following the Chowanoc War, relations
with the natives did not improve over time.
The Lords Proprietors gave colonists permission to deal with the natives as they saw fit, and colonists
continued to encroach upon native lands with little or no compensation. The open and illegal trade of Native
American slaves compounded the problem. The Tuscaroras sought permission to move to Pennsylvania, but
were denied when North Carolina failed to certify their past good behavior. Seeing no alternative, on
September 22, 1711 the Tuscarora killed 130 colonists. The Tuscarora War lasted three and half years and
15

left 200 colonists and 1,000 Native Americans dead, and approximately 1,000 more sold into slavery (Ward
and Davis 1999:274). Many Tuscarora were forced from their homes and placed on reservations or migrated
to Pennsylvania and New York.
The Tuscarora War effectively cleared the region of Native Americans, allowing for more European
settlers to move into the area. One of the first towns founded in present day Onslow County was the town of
Swansboro along the White Oak River. It had been called Weeks Wharf, Bogue, and New Town before being
officially named Swansboro in 1746 (Anon 1950). In 1722, North Carolina became a royal colony. By that
time, Bath County had been subdivided into precincts with present day Onslow County within the Carteret
Precinct. In 1739, Bath County was dissolved and its precincts were instated as counties (Corbitt 2000).
By 1734, so many people had moved into the region that it became necessary to form a new local
government. Onslow County was formed as Onslow Precinct of Bath County from part of New Hanover
County in 1734. It was bordered to the north by the White Oak River and contained the New River along with
its major branches and creeks. The county was named after Arthur Onslow, a long established Speaker of the
House of Commons in British Parliament (Corbitt 2000). The location of the courthouse was originally set
at "the courthouse on New River" but was held in various locations, including private residences (Corbitt
2000:165).
In 1741, the town of Johnston was established and the first publicly funded ferry was built to facilitate
transportation between Johnston and the town of Whitehouse. When the courthouse was moved to Johnston
in 1744, the ferry allowed for residents of the county to travel there to conduct business (Corbitt 2000). A
large amount of the county's expenditures was used for public works, including the courthouse and jail
(Watson 1995).
In the 1740s, slaves made up only 15 percent of the population of Onslow County, but by the 1770s
that number had jumped to 45 percent. However, only eight people are recorded as having more than ten slaves
in 1771 (Watson 1995). Slaves were used for labor in the agricultural development of the county. While
Indian corn and livestock were the predominant resources, people also grew peas, fruit, flax, cotton, and
tobacco. Fishing and hunting were relied upon as well, and the forests of the region provided lumber,
turpentine, tar, and pitch (Watson 1995).
During the Revolutionary War in 1781, Earl Cornwallis wrote to General Clinton "North Carolina is,
of all the provinces in North America, the most difficult to attack... on account of its great extent, of its
numberless rivers and creeks, and the total want of interior navigation" (Carrington 1974). In spite of these
setbacks the British did fight in North Carolina, though unsuccessfully. British commanders focused much of
their strength on dividing the north and the south somewhere along the Virginia line, but they were hindered
by the low number of Loyalist supporters in the area as well as their minimal knowledge ofthe land. Two large
battles were won along the North Carolina /South Carolina border that helped turn the tide toward eventual
American victory. The October 7, 1780 Battle of Kings Mountain was an enormous victory of Patriots over
Loyalists that caused Cornwallis to withdraw out of North Carolina back into South Carolina (Cleveland
County Government [CCG] 2005). Not long after, at Cowpens, on January 17, 1781, the Americans defeated
the British again under the command of Daniel Morgan. Nine months later Cornwallis surrendered to
Washington in Yorktown, Virginia (National Park Service [NPS] 2005). Most of Onslow County was spared
from any battles during the Revolution, although in 1781 the county was raided for supplies by British troops
under the direction of Major James Craig (Brown 1960).
16

In 1787, the port district of Swansboro was established, complimenting the existing districts of
Brunswick (Wilmington), Beaufort, Bath, Roanoke, and Currituck. Trade through Port Swansboro was
relatively insignificant. Twenty -two vessels, mostly small sloops and schooners, entered the port from July 1,
1789 to March 10, 1790. Trade beyond the state boundaries was mainly linked to South Carolina, but a few
vessels arrived from the West Indies and New England (Watson 1995:55). Improvements to river
transportation were undertaken in 1800 when the White Oak River was divided into districts, and in 1810
Swansboro commissioners were vested with the power to remove obstructions which might impede the
movement of vessels along the river (Watson 1995).
Richlands Plantation, located in the northwest portion of Onslow County east of the present town of
Richlands, was one of the largest naval stores producers in the region during the nineteenth century. Richlands
plantation was owned by John Avirett. Having been in the county since pre - Revolutionary War times, the
Aviretts became one of Onslow County's most prominent antebellum landholding families. Most of what we
know about the plantation was recorded by John Avirett's his son, James B. Avirett (1901; Polson and Brown
1989; Watson 1995).
John Avirett was born in 1797 in Onslow County. His father, also named John Avirett, hosted George
Washington on his southern tour (Cecelski 2000). Avirett was involved in local politics. He served as the
Justice of the Peace for Onslow County and was on the Council of State. By 1850 John Avirett was the second
wealthiest man in Onslow County (Watson 1995). James B. Avirett was born in 1837 and grew up on
Richlands Plantation.
At its height, John Avirett owned 2,500 arable acres and 20,060 acres of timberland near the New
River ( Polson and Brown 1989; Watson 1995) with the turpentine orchard stretching from the New River to
White Oak pocosin (Cecelski 2000). In 1850, his land was worth an estimated $25,000. In addition, he owned
125 slaves, two turpentine distilleries (including one steam distillery), and several cooperage shops. His
cooperage shops produced the barrels for the turpentine at a rate of 42 barrels per cooper per week. Annual
income for the plantation was approximately $60,000. Turpentine production totaled 30,000 barrels a year.
Crops grown on the arable land included tobacco, sorghum, cotton, wheat, oats, rye, and corn. Limestone and
marl, which was abundant in the area, was used in the agricultural fields to improve the yield. Small amounts
of rice were grown along the river banks ( Avirett 1901).
Many plantation owners used white overseers to supervise the work of the slaves. However, Avirett
believed that white overseers were not to be trusted. Instead, Avirett used a black foreman named "Uncle
Phillip." There were also subordinate foremen, who were in charge of individual activities including hoeing,
ditching, boxing, turpentine production, and grist milling ( Avirett 1901).
Avirett (190 1) noted that the turpentine plantations could not be insured as the timber as well as their
products (e.g., turpentine, rosin, tar), were all combustible. To help alleviate the potential for disaster,
approximately 20 white families lived throughout the pine lands. They lived in cabins, rent free, in return for
providing necessary services. Foremost was the suppression of fire. Each family was required to extinguish
fires, mostly begun by lightning strikes, before they got out of hand. Other families were to be called for help
if the fire became too big for one family to control. These families were also in charge of salting and caring for
the cattle and sheep. Sheep were penned up every night to be protected from dogs, wildcats, and bears. The
families also attended to the honey bees on the plantation. They collected the honey when it got cold and
delivered it to the main house for their use. Lastly, as part of the contract, the men were to work on the estate's
road system. Most of the families provided for themselves. The men hunted and fished during the day, and the
17

women tended to garden plots. The Richlands Plantation did serve as a market for game, poultry, and berries
collected by these families ( Avirett 1901).
Captain Otway Burns is another renowned Onslow County native, born near Swansboro. He served
as a privateer in command of the Snap Dragon during the War of 1812. Burns had been a sailing master
before the war, trading between New Bern and Portland, Maine. The Snap Dragon had three successful
voyages under Burns, before it was lost to the British under another captain's command. In 1818, Burns also
built and financed the Prometheus, the first steamboat built in North Carolina (Watson 1995).
Jacksonville was authorized as the county seat in 1842, but it was not laid out until after 1849. During
the middle 1800s, the need for improved transportation saw the establishment of numerous plank road
construction companies, including the Jacksonville and Trent River Plank Road Company in 1852, and the
Richlands and New River Plank Road Company in 1855. Ultimately, attempts to connect Onslow County with
markets in Wilmington and New Bern by plank roads were not successful (Watson 1995).
During the Antebellum period, rice and cotton became increasingly important crops. The number of
slaves in the county rose from 174 in 1790 to 3,499 in 1860. Livestock populations increased. Swansboro
became a prominent center for ship and steamboat production (Watson 1995). Turpentine production also
increased in the county. However, some planters (including Avirett) sold off their land, likely due to the mass
destruction and deforestation caused by the collecting of pine products. In fact, Cecelski (2000) suggests that
the entire North Carolina naval stores industry was affected by the self - destructive force ofthe turpentine boom
of the 1840s and 1850s. They often collected only the first season's pine sap because it brought the highest
price. Pines only lived about six years after being boxed, which resulted in thousands of acres of dying forests.
North Carolina saw much more fighting on its own soil during the Civil War than it had during the
Revolutionary War. The fall ofNew Bern in 1862 alarmed the North Carolinians who responded by initiating
military training camps all over the state (Trotter 1989). Onslow County supplied five infantry and two
cavalry companies to the confederacy equaling nearly one fifth of the county's population. The residents of
the county suffered as there were repeated assaults to their saltworks and the general problems of poverty and
hunger in the region (Watson 1995).
After the Civil War, the South was divided into five military districts with a general commander to help
organize elections and the rebuilding of government. The Carolinas were overseen by Major General Daniel
Sickles. All of the Southern states were required to ratify the Fourteenth Amendment, which gave citizenship
and civil liberties to freed blacks, and allowed universal suffrage before they could rejoin the Union (Powell
1989). North Carolina reentered the Union in 1868.
Local economies in most of the southern states were devastated after the Civil War due to the loss of
slave labor and damage to property and fields. Few farmers had the money to pay for field labor and many
had to sell their land (York 1992). Farm size also began to decline during this time period as tenancy increased
(Piehl 1979). The tenant farmer system led to economic and social problems in the region, and many African
American laborers could afford to migrate to other parts of the county. This migration began at the end ofthe
1870s and continued through the 1890s (Watson 1979). The population of Onslow County dropped from
8,856 to 7,569 during this time (U.S. Census 1870 - 1890). Shipbuilding declined and crop and livestock
production failed. The construction of railroad lines through the county connecting Swansboro with New Bern
and Wilmington allowed for increased mercantilism between the towns (Watson 1995). During the late 1800s,
18

maritime trade centered on White Oak River and Swansboro. Naval stores, cotton, peanuts, lumber and fish
were common exports (Watson 1995).
The outbreak of World War II and the establishment of Camp Lejeune brought about the most
important change in Onslow County during the twentieth century. Camp Lejeune became operational in 1941.
The construction ofthe base changed the demographics ofthe county as increasing numbers of single men and
young families moved into the area. However, it also disrupted local life, as 720 families (2,400 people) were
left homeless when their homes and/or land were taken by the government for the base construction. It took
an average of two years between the time residents were evicted and they were paid some form of compensation
for the loss of their property (Watson 1995). Camp Lejeune grew to be the largest Marine Corps training base
in the country, covering 151,000 acres, almost 30 percent of the county's land.
Today, Onslow County has more than 150,000 residents. It encompasses 900 square miles, with about
15 percent being open water. Jacksonville has become increasingly urbanized and Swansboro has grown as
the lumber industry has become more profitable there (OCO 2006). Agriculture and fishing are still large
industries in the county, although retail sales have now become the largest driving force in local economy
(Greater Topsail Area Chamber of Commerce [GTACC] 2004).
History of the Project Tract
The project area falls within the large land holdings of members of the Dudley family. During the
eighteenth and nineteenth centuries, this family was influential in the area. According to census data,
Christopher Dudley, Esquire was in North Carolina as early as 1717. His son, Christopher, accumulated
thousands of acres in the project vicinity through 1799. In 1790, Christopher (junior) owned 17 slaves; his
slave holdings increased to 60 by 1800. Thomas Dudley acquired 3,300 acres between 1729 and 1785. In
1790, he is shown as owning nine slaves in the first North Carolina census. In 1800, he owned only six slaves,
and owned only four in 1810.
Edward Bishop Dudley was born in 1789 in the project vicinity. He was a Lieutenant Colonel in the
Onslow Regiment of Volunteers who were charged with protecting Wilmington during the War of 1812. He
was instrumental in the formation and success of the Whig party in North Carolina on to become the first
governor of the state elected by popular vote. He served as governor from 1836 to 1841 (Hill 2007). He also
organized the Wilmington and Weldon Railroad, which was the longest continuous rail line in the world at the
time of its completion in 1840 at 161 miles (Gilbert and Jefferies 1969). Edward Dudley owned tens of
thousands of acres of land in the county. The 1830 Federal Census lists him as owning 159 slaves. On the
1850 census, he is listed as a farmer owning 20,000 acres and 140 slaves ranging in age from 2 months to 95
years. This same record shows his son, Robert, living in his household. Robert is also listed as a farmer.
After Edward's death in 1855, his son, Robert, began selling off the land holdings. The 1860 Federal Census
shows Robert's real estate valued at $4,000, although the value of his personal estate exceeded $15,000. There
are few records for the white Dudleys in the project area after 1860; however, a large number of black Dudleys
are shown in the federal census from 1870 into the twentieth century, some of whom may have been slaves of
the Dudley family who remained in the area after their emancipation.
There are gaps in the ownership records for the project area; however, in 1942 it was owned by the
John L. Roper Lumber Company. Captain John L. Roper, a Virginian, began this company following the Civil
War and specialized in North Carolina pine. Captain Roper retired in 1905, but the Roper Lumber Company
19

continued operation throughout the eastern seaboard. In 1942, the project area property was transferred to the
North Carolina Pulp Company. The North Carolina Pulp Company was established in 1937 and merged with
Weyerhauser in 1957 (Lilly 2012). Weyerhauser held the property until the mid 1980s when it was purchased
by John Koenig. From that time on, title to the property has passed through a number of entities including
Woodland Developers, LLC, and the Westminster Company. It is presently owned by Mr. Koenig, who is the
developer of the Williamsburg Plantation subdivision.
20

Chapter 3. Results of Investigation
Background Research Results
A review of the archaeological site files was conducted at the North Carolina Office of State
Archaeology (OSA) in Raleigh prior to the initiation of field investigations. Only one archaeological
investigation has been conducted in the project area. This investigation was a survey of the proposed Western
Blvd. Extension corridor which comes into close proximity to the project tracts. This survey was conducted
in 1979. It did not identify any archaeological resources in the project area (Coats 1979). No archaeological
resources had been recorded within the tract boundaries prior to our investigation.
Field Investigation Results
Approximately 314 acres of the Williamsburg Plantation Expansion tracts were slated for
archaeological survey. Shovel tests were excavated at 30 meter intervals along parallel transects spaced 30
meters apart. Shovel test soil profiles varied throughout the tracts depending on the specific environmental
setting. However, most soil profiles exhibited 10 to 20 cm of grayish brown sand overlaying brown or
yellowish brown sandy loam to a depth of 50 to 60 cm. Yellow or red sandy clay subsoil was typically
encountered below that depth. Eleven archaeological sites were recorded during this investigation. Each is
discussed individually below. Fifteen isolated finds were also recorded and are discussed as a group following
the archaeological site discussion. Figure 8 shows the location of all recorded archaeological resources.
Archaeological Sites
Site 31ON1831
Site Type: Prehistoric artifact scatter Topographic Setting: Upland flat
Component(s): Woodland Vegetation: Mixed pines and hardwoods
UTMs (NAD27): 3853141 N 275442 E NRHP Recommendation: Ineligible
Site 31 ON 1831 is a prehistoric artifact scatter located at the northern end of the project area (Figure
8). The site is situated on an upland flat. Although the site area is relatively level, the landform slopes down
steeply to the east to an intermittent stream. A woods trail is present west of the site. The site vicinity is
characterized by a mixed pine and hardwood forest.
Site dimensions measure 30 by 15 meters based on the distribution of positive shovel tests and the edge
of the landform (Figure 9). Typical soil profiles in the site vicinity consisted of 25 cm of dark grayish brown
sandy loam overlaying grayish brown sandy loam to a depth of 60 cm. Pale brown sandy loam was present
between 60 and 100+ cm below the ground surface.
21

r►� 11 fir` _
'•r. _ f'f •f `• \. 310NIS31
310N1843
M 310N1842'f �i• s:. j�
81ON1832 i ��+ ^. ^ 4 �7 `
JP
,w• ^�� „ 1 _ ` r 11v —,mil � '
34
310N1854 Fri
Of
1 ~� 310N1845 �. 310Ni$34
•� ' `_ 310N1851
L p 310N1844
31ON1846
31ON1852
31ON1836 u L
1^ l• t... - 31ON1849 41
rl► 31ON1853 4
rde` 3ION1838
yx / r 310N7837 meth .
—'
'22
310N1850
310N184 P
31gN1835 31gN184B IT �OK�A" k
31ON1841
31ON1833 L•' iJ r.
Williamsburg Plantation Survey
_ - Project Parcels N
Archaeological site wF
' - Isolated Find 8
0 300 (W %.0
Figure 8. Map showing the Williamsburg Expansion tracts and identified archaeological resources
(1997 Jacksonville North, NC USGS 7.5 minute topographic quadrangle).
22

31ON1831 N
wH
Site Plan S
❑ Negative Shovel Test
• Positive Shovel Test
a 15 30
meters
Site Dimensions: 30 x 15 meters
Total Shovel Tests: 11
Grid Interval: 15 meters
Positive Artifact Locations: 2 sub.
Datum: N500 E500
Figure 9. Plan map of site 3ION1831.
Woods Trail 1 /f 0 ///;74
❑ , ❑ r
1J a
a / �r � 2.1
11 �.
1
Site Boundary
s
❑ i
(Pines and
Hardwoods �
�J
r
Intermittent Stream
Artifacts recovered from 3 ION 1831 consist of one metavolcanic flake and two cord marked body
sherds with fine /medium sand temper. The ceramic sherds could not be identified by type and can only be dated
to the general Woodland Period. The flake is not culturally diagnostic.
Site 3 ION 1831 is a very small scatter of prehistoric artifacts. Despite the presence of diagnostic
artifacts, no cultural features or organic remains were identified. The small size of the site does not allow for
the identification of activity areas. This site will not add significantly to our understanding of the Middle
Woodland Period in the project area and is recommended not eligible for the NRHP.
23

Site 31ON1832
Site Type: Prehistoric artifact scatter
Component(s): Middle Woodland
UTMs (NAD27): 3852425 N 275420 E
Topographic Setting: Upland flat
Vegetation: Mixed pines and hardwoods
NRHP Recommendation: Ineligible
Site 3ION1832 is a prehistoric artifact scatter located in the northern portion of the project area (see
Figure 8). The site is situated at the edge of an upland flat. Steep down slope leading to an unnamed drainage
is located south of the site. A trail extends through the site from north to south, before turning west at the
southern end of the site. The surrounding forest contains a mix of pines and hardwoods.
The distribution of positive shovel tests forms site boundaries measuring 75 by 30 meters (Figure 10).
Soil profiles from positive shovel tests typically exhibited 15 to 30 cm of brown sandy loam overlaying yellow
brown sandy loam to a depth of 80 cm. Reddish yellow sandy clay was present below that depth. In some
areas, the soil was much shallower with reddish yellow clay present at 40 cm below the surface.
Nine artifacts were recovered from this site (Table 4). These artifacts include seven flakes /flake
fragments and two ceramic sherds. The flakes /flake fragments are made of metavolcanic and quartz. One
sherd is a Hanover cord marked sherd with grog temper and is generally associated with the Middle Woodland
Period. The residual sherds and lithics are not diagnostic of any particular cultural period. Artifacts were
recovered from depths of up to 70 cm. However, six of nine artifacts were recovered within 30 cm of the
ground surface, including the ceramics.
Table 4. Summary of Artifacts Recovered from 3ION1832.
Artifact
Count
Comments
Ceramics
cord marked sherd, grog temper
1
Hanover; Middle Woodland
residual sherd
1
possibly Hanover
Lithics
metavolcanic flake /flake fragment
4
quartz flake /flake fragment
3
all with cortex
Site 31ON1832 is a Middle Woodland artifact scatter. Organic remains and cultural features were
not identified at the site. Logging and cultivation ofthe project area has disturbed the site deposits, particularly
those deposits within 30 cm of the ground surface. This site is not likely to contain well - preserved, intact
deposits. Site 31ON1832 has no further research potential and is recommended not eligible for the NRHP.
24

v
a
A
a °
Site Boundary °
fit
v
� v
0
31 v
c c , 21 1
Pines and v 1
Hardwoods o '
Figure 10. Plan map of site 31ON1832.
v
31 ON 1832
W' t
Site Plan s
o Negative Shovel Test
• Positive Shovel Test
0 15 :30
+ricrrrs
P
Site Dimensions: 75 x 30 meters
Total shovel Tests: 31
Grid Interval: 15 meters
Positive Artifact Locations: 7 sub.
❑ Datum: N500 E500
i
A
v
Site 31ON1833
Site Type: Prehistoric artifact scatter; Historic artifact scatter Topographic Setting: Upland flat
Component(s): Early -Late Woodland, Unknown Historic Vegetation: Mixed pines and hardwoods
UTMs (NAD27): 3850201 N 375345 E NRHP Recommendation: Unassessed
Site 31ON1833 is a prehistoric artifact scatter with a few intrusive pieces of historic material. It is
located at the southern end of the survey area (see Figure 8). The site is situated on a upland adjacent to a
wetland associated with the New River and one of its unnamed tributaries. A trail extends from north to south
along the western edge ofthe landform and along the western site boundary. Pines and hardwoods characterize
the surrounding forest.
Positive shovel tests and the wetland were used to define site boundaries measuring 210 by 120 meters
(Figure 11). Soil profiles typically exhibited 20 cm of dark gray sandy loam overlaying brown sand to a depth
of 35 cm. Yellowish brown sand was present to a depth of 75 to 100 cm.
25

p
N
f 31ON1833 zlh,
Site Plan
o Negative Shovel Test
Law /Wet _ • Positive Shovel Test
I
0 1g 3D
I 351 � _ mnMs
I p
r ■ Site Dimensions. 210 x 120 meters
Total Shovel Tests: 100
331 r Grid Interval: 15 meters
Positive Artifact Locations: 35 sub.
a ❑Datum: N500 E500
I
I J
°
U
31A 0
r' a 311 •
J 0 za.1 �
■
j I 29.1 c
4 ❑
I+
f •
26.1 ,
I I 27.1 � 25.1
° 1 24.1
a
f ■ a
I 23.1 ■ '
0 ■ 21.1
4 0 19
an 6 m1
❑ Pines ti .1
Hardwoods � Low /Wet
Trail' i ■ 7 a 1
1
17.1
D ■
■
16.1
a 11.1 •
1 p 13.1 i
°
f J 0 ,
ij •
,o, '
D
0
A
a { ' S, ❑
, 4.1
t 1Q
o x
, i I
°
�4
1A a
""'Site Boundary �
0
�owlwet
Figure 11. Plan map of site 31ON1833.
26

The historic assemblage includes five pieces of clear bottle glass. All were recovered from a single
shovel test (Provenience 9.1) in close proximity to the trail. These artifacts are likely intrusive and are related
to prior land use activities (i.e., logging, cultivation, hunting) at the site.
A total of 115 prehistoric artifacts were recovered from 31ON1833 (Table 5). These included 80
ceramic sherds and 35 lithic artifacts. Identified surface treatments include fabric impressing and cord
marking. Tempering agents identified include sand (fine to very coarse grain size), limestone, grog (crushed
ceramic), and shell. Diagnostic ceramics consist of Early Woodland Hamp's Landing (limestone tempered),
Middle Woodland Hanover (grog tempered), and Late Woodland White Oak (shell tempered) wares. It was
not possible to definitively type the sand tempered sherds, so they can only be dated to the general Woodland
Period.
Table 5. Summary of Prehistoric Artifacts Recovered from 31 ON] 933
Artifact
Count
Comments
Ceramics
fabric impressed, very coarse sand/granular temper
1
Woodland
cord marked, very coarse sand temper
1
Woodland
fabric impressed, fine sand temper
1
Woodland
fabric impressed, limestone temper
1
Hamp's Landing; Early Woodland
fabric impressed, coarse sand and grog
6
Hanover; Middle Woodland
fabric impressed, grog temper
33
Hanover; Middle Woodland
cord marked, grog temper
3
Hanover; Middle Woodland
unidentified decoration, grog temper
7
Hanover; Middle Woodland
unidentified decoration, shell temper
1
White Oak, Late Woodland
residual sherd
26
Woodland
Lithics
metavolcanic flake /flake fragment
5
all fine grained Rhyolite
quartz flake /flake fragment
24
15 with cortex
quartz pebble
1
possibly heat treated; tool or FCR?
chert flake /flake fragment
5
1 with cortex and heat treated
Hanover is the most common ceramic type and is scattered throughout the site, indicating extensive
use of the landform during the Middle Woodland Period. The Hamp's Landing sherd was recovered from the
central portion of the site (Provenience 19.1). The Late Woodland White Oak sherd was recovered from
Provenience 30.1 near the northern end of the site. The low frequency of Early and Late Woodland artifacts
suggests that these occupations were ephemeral. The Early Woodland Hamp's Landing and Middle Woodland
Hanover sherds were recovered between 0 and 30 cm below the surface. The Late Woodland White Oak was
recovered between 0 and 20 cm below surface. The difference in depths between the earlier and later artifacts
suggests that the site may retain some level of stratigraphic integrity.
27

The lithic assemblage is composed of 34 flakes /flake fragments and one quartz pebble. Lithic raw
materials include metavolcanic, chert and quartz. None of these artifacts can be attributed to a particular
cultural period. There are no distinctive concentrations of lithic artifacts or raw materials at the site. Most
of the artifacts (ceramics and lithics) were recovered within 40 cm of the ground surface. However, deposits
extended to depths approaching 70 cm. In some instances (Proveniences 2.1/2, 13. 1, and 27. 1), a distinct
stratigraphic break between artifacts was observed, indicating deep deposits and possible stratigraphically (and
temporally) distinct occupations. These deep deposits may indicate a possible, as yet unrecognized, Archaic
component.
Site 31ON1833 is a large scatter of prehistoric artifacts dating to the Early through Late Woodland
Periods with a minor historic component. The historic component is minimal, likely intrusive, and has no
further research potential. The prehistoric component contains several diagnostic ceramics. Specific loci for
the Early and Late Woodland Period occupations may be identified by the distribution ofthe Hamp's Landing
and White Oak ceramics. The site also appears to retain some stratigraphic integrity based on the depths of
the ceramic and lithic deposits. Although no cultural features were identified during the survey, there appears
to be little observable disturbance to the site, and the potential for identifying intact cultural deposits (i.e.,
features) is good. 31ON1833 has the potential to yield important data pertaining to the ceramic chronology,
lithic reduction strategies, and settlement patterns of Woodland Period peoples. Additional work is necessary
to fully determine the research potential of this site. Therefore, we recommend 31ON1833 be considered
unassessed with respect to NRHP criteria pending further investigation.
Site 31ON1834
Site Type: Prehistoric artifact scatter Topographic Setting: Ridge toe
Component(s): Woodland Vegetation: Mixed pines and hardwoods
UTMs (NAD27): 3851334 N 276112 E NRHP Recommendation: Ineligible
Site 31 ON 1834 is a prehistoric lithic scatter located in the east - central portion of the project area (see
Figure 8). The site is situated on a narrow, relatively level ridge toe. A steep down slope toward an unnamed
tributary of the New River is present east of the site deposits. Steep ridge side slope is present north and south
of the deposits. An existing sewer line corridor bounds the site on the east. A mixed pine and hardwood forest
characterizes the site vicinity.
Site dimensions measuring 15 by 75 meters were established based on the distribution of positive
shovel test and the landform (Figure 12). Typical soil profiles in the site vicinity consisted of 20 cm of grayish
brown sandy loam overlaying yellowish brown sandy loam to a depth of 30 cm. Mottled sandy clay subsoil
was present below 30 cm.
Excavations at 31ON1834 yielded two quartz flakes /flake fragments, one quartz projectile point
fragment, and one residual sherd. The residual sherd can be placed within the broad Woodland Period, but
none of the artifacts can be attributed to a specific subperiod.
Site 3ION1834 is a Woodland artifact scatter. No diagnostic artifacts, organic remains, or cultural
features were identified at the site. The site has been adversely impacted by logging and cultivation and is not
likely to contain well - preserved, intact cultural deposits. 31ON1834 is recommended not eligible for the
NRHP.
28

31ON1834
Site Plan 5
o Negative Shovel Test
■ Positive Shovel Test
n ig 30
Site Dimensions: 15 x 75 meters
Total Shovel Tests: 24
Grid Interval: 15 meters
Positive Artifact Locations: 4 sub.
❑Datum: N500 E500
0 0 0
Site Boundary..
~ ~ b
O ° 1 1 Y� ❑ S�1 HP� 7Q i V
J
Pines and
Hardwoods 1 -`
�J
0 0 °
A
Treeline
Figure 12. Plan map of site 310N1834.
Site 31ON1835
Site Type: Prehistoric artifact scatter Topographic Setting: Upland flat
Component(s): Woodland Vegetation: Mixed pines and hardwoods
UTMs (NAD27): 3850428 N 275305 E NRHP Recommendation: Ineligible
Site 310N1835 is a prehistoric artifact scatter located in the southern portion of the project tract,
approximately 120 meters north of 31ON1833 (see Figure 8). This site is situated on the edge of an upland
flat and extends slightly down the side slope which slopes down to the west toward a marsh associated with
the New River. Mixed pine and hardwood forest characterizes the site vicinity.
Positive shovel tests at the site form boundaries measuring 45 by 15 meters (Figure 13). Shovel test
soil profiles exhibited 10 cm of very dark gray sandy loam overlaying brown sandy loam to a depth of 30 cm.
Yellowish brown sandy loam was present between 30 and 50 cm, below which pale brown sandy loam was
encountered.
29

y
31 ❑N 1835
W L
Site Plan 5
a Negative Shovel Test
* Positive Shovel Test
o 15 30
�neiers
Site Dimensions: 45 x 15 meters
Total Shovel Tests: 16
Grid Interval: 15 meters
Positive Artifact Locations: 2 sub.
❑ Datum: N500 E500
Figure 13. Plan map of site 310N1835.
D
D
a
�
1 �
0
70
� o
Site Boundary
a
0
Pines and
Hardwoods
o f�
Artifacts recovered from site 3ION1835 consist of one metavolcanic flake /flake fragment and two
ceramic sherds. Surface treatments include fabric impressed and an unidentified decoration. Both sherds are
sand tempered. Neither sherd has characteristics distinctive of a particular ceramic type. They can only be
associated with the general Woodland Period. The ceramics were recovered within 15 cm of the ground
surface. The flake was recovered between 20 and 40 cm below the surface.
Site 310N1835 yielded an extremely small artifact assemblage. No diagnostic artifacts, cultural
features, or organic remains were identified. The cultural deposits are shallow and have been disturbed by
logging and agricultural activities. This site will not contribute new or significant data pertaining to the
Woodland Period. Site 31ON1835 is recommended not eligible for the NRHP.
30

Site 31ON1836
Site Type: Prehistoric artifact scatter
Component(s): Middle Woodland
UTMs (NAD27): 3850995 N 274982 E
Topographic Setting: Ridge nose
Vegetation: Mixed pines and hardwoods
NRHP Recommendation: Ineligible
Site 3ION1836 is a prehistoric artifact scatter located in the west - central portion of the survey area
(see Figure 8). The site is situated on a ridge nose that slopes down to the southwest. Steeper ridge side slopes
are present northwest and southeast ofthe site. The surrounding forest contains a mix of pines and hardwoods.
Dimensions of the site measure 120 by 30 meters (Figure 14). These boundaries were determined
based on the distribution of positive shovel tests and the landform. Soil profiles consisted of 15 cm of grayish
brown sandy loam overlaying brown sandy loam to a depth of 35 cm. Yellowish brown sandy loam, grading
to pale brown, was present below 35 cm and extended to depths greater than 75 cm below surface.
A total of 25 artifacts were collected from this site (Table 6). They include 14 ceramic sherds, one
piece of fired clay, and 10 flakes /flake fragments. The ceramics include both rim and body sherds. Fabric
impressed, net impressed, and cord marked account for the identifiable surface treatments. Tempering agents
include various grain sizes of sand and grog. Middle Woodland Hanover (grog tempered) ceramics are the only
diagnostic wares in the assemblage. The sand tempered wares could not be identified by type. The lithic
assemblage consists of non - diagnostic debitage. Lithic raw materials include quartz and metavolcanics.
Table 6. Summary of Artifacts Recovered from 3 ION 1836.
Artifact
Count
Comments
Ceramics
fabric impressed, fine /medium sand temper
1
Woodland
fabric impressed, medium sand temper
1
Woodland
net impressed, coarse /very coarse sand temper
1
Woodland
cord marked, grog temper
2
Hanover, Middle Woodland
net impressed, grog temper
1
Hanover; Middle Woodland
unidentified decoration, very coarse sand temper
1
Woodland
residual sherd
7
Woodland
fired clay
1
Lithics
metavolcanic flake /flake fragment
3
quartz flake /flake fragment
7
31

31 ON1836
Site Plan s P
❑ Negative Shovel Test
■ Positive Shovel Test
0 15 30
melnrs
Site dimensions: 120 x 30 meters
Total Shovel Tests: 39
Grid Interval: 15 meters
Positive Artifact Locations; 10 sub.
❑ Datum: N500 E500
0
■
o
10 0
4.1 ,O
L
■ I' - -- -Site BoundaryO
8.1 ,0
' 6,1 ' O
0 I ' q
C■ 41
1 0 , Pines and
5.1 / Hardwood
3.7 r ❑
4
°
I p
O
Figure 14. Plan map of site 310N1836.
32
l

The distribution of the artifacts do not show any apparent patterns. The ceramics are evenly
distributed throughout the site. The lithics are also relatively evenly distributed, although three of the four
shovel tests that yielded lithic artifacts are located in the central and northern portions of the site. Artifacts
were typically recovered within 30 cm of the ground surface. The two exceptions are Proveniences 3.1 and
4.1 which had deposits extending to 40 and 50 cm, respectively.
Site 31ON1838 is a Middle Woodland artifact scatter. The site has been disturbed by logging and
agricultural activities. The deposits are relatively shallow, increasing their likelihood of being disturbed and
mixed. The potential for identifying well - preserved, intact deposits (i.e., cultural features) and stratigraphically
distinct occupations is low. Specific activity areas were also not discernable from the artifact distributions.
This site has no further research potential and is recommended not eligible for the NRHP.
Site 31ON1837
Site Type: Prehistoric artifact scatter
Component(s): Middle Woodland
UTMs (NAD27): 3850948 N 275640 E
Topographic Setting: Upland flat
Vegetation: Mixed pines and hardwoods
NRHP Recommendation: Ineligible
Site 3ION1837 is a prehistoric artifact scatter located in the east - central portion of the project area
(see Figure 8). The site is situated on an upland flat. There is virtually no topographic relief in the immediate
site vicinity. An old logging road/trail is located approximately 45 to 60 meters southwest ofthe site. A mixed
pine and hardwood forest characterizes the site vicinity.
The distribution of positive shovel tests forms site boundaries measuring 60 by 60 meters (Figure 15).
Typical shovel test soil profiles consisted of 10 cm of dark gray sandy loam overlaying grayish brown sandy
loam to a depth of 30 cm. Yellowish brown sandy loam, grading to pale brown/white sand, was present
between 40 and 70+ cm below surface.
A total of 11 artifacts were recovered from 31ON1837 (Table 7). They include lithic debitage and
prehistoric ceramics. The lithic assemblage includes quartz and metavolcanic flakes /flake fragments and one
piece of shatter. The ceramic assemblage consists of six sherds. Cord marking and simple stamping account
for the identified surface treatments. Two of the sherds are diagnostic Hanover wares. One has an
unidentified decoration, and one is cord marked. Hanover wares are typically associated with the Middle
Woodland Period. The remaining sherds could not be specifically identified to type.
The majority of the artifacts were recovered within 30 cm of the surface, although deposits did extend
up to 60 cm in some areas. Artifacts are widely dispersed, and their distribution does not show any particular
pattern.
Site 3 ION 1837 is a Middle Woodland artifact scatter. The site has low artifact density, and the
artifact assemblage is limited. The site deposits have been disturbed by logging and cultivation leaving little
potential for the presence of intact cultural deposits. Site 31 ON1837 will not yield significant data pertaining
to the Middle Woodland period and is recommend not eligible for the NRHP.
33

a
Site Boundary
..-I
R.1 �
0
/ \a:i
°r
o ,
•
•'
° � 1°
° \ /
f
o Pines and
Hardwoods °
r
0
0
Figure 15. Plan map of site 310N1837.
Tahle 7. Summary of Artifacts Recovered from 31 ON] 837
°
31 ON1837
Site Plan
° Negative Shovel Test
■ Positive Shovel Test
n 15 30
- N-
Site Dimensions: 60 x 60 meters
Total Shovel Tests: 32
Grid Interval: 15 meters
Positive Artifact Locations: 6 sub.
Q Datum. N500 E500
°
n
Artifact
Count
Comments
Ceramics
cord marked, fine sand temper
1
Woodland
cord marked, grog temper
1
Hanover; Middle Woodland
unidentified decoration, grog temper
1
Hanover; Middle Woodland
residual sherd
3
1 simple stamped
Lithics
metavolcanic flake /flake fragment
3
quartz flake /flake fragment
1
with cortex
quartz shatter
1
with cortex, possible core fragment
34

Site 31ON1838
Site Type: Prehistoric artifact scatter
Component(s): Early Woodland
UTMs (NAD27): 3850975 N 275721 E
Topographic Setting: Upland flat
Vegetation: Mixed pines and hardwoods
NRHP Recommendation: Ineligible
Site 31 ON 183 8 is a prehistoric artifact scatter located approximately 60 meters east of site 31 ON 1837
(see Figure 8). The site is situated at the edge of an upland flat. Steep side slope is present north of the site.
At the bottom of the side slope is a small intermittent drainage. Pines and hardwoods characterize the
surrounding forest. Push piles extend through the site. A large, shallow depression is present at the southern
end of the site.
Site dimensions measure 56 by 60 meters based upon the distribution of positive shovel tests and the
landform (Figure 16). Typical soil profiles observed at the site consisted of 15 cm of dark gray sandy loam
overlaying yellow or pale brown sandy loam to a depth of 40 cm. Pale brown clay loam was present below
40 cm.
Positive shovel tests yielded nine artifacts (Table 8). The assemblage includes four ceramics and five
non - diagnostic quartz flakes /flake fragments. The ceramics exhibited fabric impressed and cord marked
surface treatments. One sherd has an unidentifiable decoration. Identified tempering agents include limestone
and sand. The limestone tempered sherds are Hamp's Landing dating to the Early Woodland Period. The sand
tempered sherds could not be identified to type. All artifacts were recovered within 40 cm of the ground
surface.
Table 8. Summary of Artifacts Recovered from 3 ION 1838.
Artifact
Count
Comments
Ceramics
fabric impressed, fine sand temper
1
Woodland
fabric impressed, limestone tempered
1
Hamp's Landing; Early Woodland
unidentified decoration, limestone tempered
1
Hamp's Landing; Early Woodland
cord marked, medium sand temper
1
Woodland
Lithics
quartz flake /flake fragment
5
all with cortex
Site 31ON1838 is a scatter of ceramics and lithics dating from the Early Woodland Period. The site
deposits are shallow and have been disturbed by logging and cultivation. Additional disturbance is indicated
by the push piles and depression. This site deposits will not yield significant data pertaining to the Early
Woodland Period and have no further research potential. Site 31 ON1838 is recommended not eligible for the
NRHP.
35

Pines and
Hardwoods
O
310N1$38 �` e
Site Plan
o Negative Shovel Test
■ Positive Shovel Test
%Push Pile
C,'3Depression
n 15 sa
Site Dimensions: 45 x 60 meters
Total Shovel Tests: 21
Grid Interval: 15 meters
Positive Artifact Locations: 5 sub.
❑Datum: N500 E500
■ 3�i
•
a 4.1 l _
�a
0
1
V -Site Boundary
J _
a
0
0
Figure 16. Plan map of site 3ION1838.
Site 31ON1839
Site Type: Prehistoric artifact scatter Topographic Setting: Bluff
Component(s): Middle Woodland Vegetation: Mixed pines and hardwoods
UTMs (NAD27): 3851048 N 276088 E NRHP Recommendation: Ineligible
IV
Site 3ION1839 is a prehistoric artifact scatter located along the eastern boundary of the project area
(see Figure 8). The site is situated on a bluff edge overlooking an unnamed tributary of the New River. Steep
slope leading down to the unnamed creek borders the site on the east. The site is surrounded by mixed pine
and hardwood forest.
The distribution of positive shovel tests forms site boundaries measuring 20 by 60 meters (Figure 17).
Soil profiles exhibited 30 cm of dark grayish brown sandy loam overlaying yellowish brown sandy loam.
Yellow sandy clay was present below 60 cm.
36

O
a
E
Site Boundary
❑ X 3r .1 III
a
❑
a ,
Pines and /
Hardwoods
tJ r a
L 1.1
0
Figure 17. Plan map of site 31ON1839.
31ON1839 �
Site Plan W `' x
❑ Negative Shovel Test
• Positive Shovel Test
❑ 15 30
meters
Site Dimensions: 20 x 60 meters
Totat Shovel Tests: 14
Grid Interval: 15 meters
Positive Artifact Locations: 3 sub.
A Datum: N500 E500
Artifacts recovered from 31ON1839 include one grog tempered sherd with an unidentifiable
decoration, two residual sherds, one quartz cobble fragment, and three metavolcanic flakes /flake fragments.
The grog tempered sherd and one of the residual sherds are Hanover wares and date to the Middle Woodland.
Artifacts were typically recovered within 30 cm of the ground surface.
Site 31 ON 1839 is a scatter of Middle Woodland artifacts. The artifact assemblage is limited and has
been disturbed by past logging and cultivation. The potential for identifying intact cultural features is low.
This site does not retain sufficient data to address pertinent research questions pertaining to the Middle
Woodland Period. Therefore, 31ON1839 is recommended not eligible for the NRHP.
37

Site 31ON1840
Site Type: Prehistoric ceramic scatter
Component(s): Middle Woodland
UTMs (NAD27): 3850557 N 275470 E
Topographic Setting: Ridge toe
Vegetation: Mixed pines and hardwoods
NRHP Recommendation: Ineligible
Site 3ION1840 is a prehistoric ceramic site located in the southern portion of the project area (see
Figure 8). The site is situated on a ridge toe that slopes down to the south. An unnamed creek is located at
the bottom of the landform. Pines and hardwoods characterize the site vicinity.
Site boundaries measuring 15 by 15 meters were established based on a single positive shovel test
(Figure 18). Soil profiles exhibited 10 cm of dark grayish brown sandy loam overlaying yellow sandy loam
to a depth of 50 cm. Yellow sandy clay was present below 50 cm.
t
Pines and
N q Hardwoods
31 ON 1840 �J
Site Plan g o
o Negative Shovel Test Site Boundary
■ Positive Shovel Test / 1
n
15 3o
meters --- ONEENEEMn
1111 v r Q o v
Site Dimensions: 15 x 15 meters
Total Shovel Tests: 7
Grid Interval: 15 meters
Positive Artifact locations: 1 sub. t
A Datum: N500 E500 0
■
Figure 18. Plan map of site 31 ON 1840.
Site 31 ON 1840 yielded three Hanover Fabric Impressed sherds, two of which mend. This would date
the site occupation to the Middle Woodland period. The artifacts were recovered between 0 and 20 cm below
surface.
Site 31 ON 1840 is a small site consisting of Middle Woodland Hanover sherds. The site deposits are
minimal and have been disturbed by past land -use activities. No lithic artifacts, organic remains, or cultural
features were identified. The site will not contribute significantly to our understanding ofthe Middle Woodland
Period and is recommended not eligible for the NRHP.
38

Site 31ON1841
Site Type: Prehistoric ceramic scatter
Component(s): Middle Woodland
UTMs (NAD27): 3850466 N 275413 E
Topographic Setting: Ridge top
Vegetation: Mixed pines and hardwoods
NRHP Recommendation: Ineligible
Site 3 ION 1841 is a prehistoric ceramic scatter located approximately 90 meters southwest of site
31 ON 1840 (see Figure 8). The site is situated at the edge of a relatively level ridge. Steep ridge side slope
leading down to an unnamed creek borders the site on the east. The surrounding forest contains a mix of pines
and hardwoods.
Site boundaries measure 60 by 15 meters (Figure 19). These dimensions were based on the distribution
of positive shovel tests. Soil profiles consisted of 20 cm of grayish brown sandy loam overlaying brown sandy
loam to a depth of 40 cm. Pale yellow sandy clay was present below 40 cm.
a
31 ON 18141
Site Plan
o Negative Shovel Test
• Positive Shovel Test
n is 30
meiera
Site Dimensions: 40 x 15 meters
Total Shovel Tests: 17
Grid Interval: 15 meters
Positive Artifact Locations: 3 sub.
❑Datum: N500 E500
■
Site Boundary--.. ■ �`
❑ I1I 3 1 1
l '
0
O
l Q 111
CPines and
Hardwood,
' 1
❑ `r /J
0
Figure 19. Plan map of site 31 ON 1841.
39
I;
i { I
I � +
t
I
I
4
a I i
I
I
I '
f { I
>f
�
1
1
Site Boundary--.. ■ �`
❑ I1I 3 1 1
l '
0
O
l Q 111
CPines and
Hardwood,
' 1
❑ `r /J
0
Figure 19. Plan map of site 31 ON 1841.
39
I;
i { I
I � +
t
I
I
4
a I i
I
I
I '
f { I
>f

Two fabric impressed sherds with grog temper and four residual sherds, also with grog temper, were
recovered at site 31 ON 1841. There ceramics are attributed to the Middle Woodland Hanover series. Ceramics
were recovered within 30 cm of the ground surface.
Site 31ON1841 is scatter of Middle Woodland Hanover sherds. The artifact assemblage is limited
with no lithic artifacts identified. Cultural features and organic remains were also not observed at the site. The
shallow deposits have been disturbed by logging and cultivation. The lack of well - preserved, intact deposits
leaves the site with no further research potential. Site 31 ON 1841 is recommended not eligible for the NRHP.
Isolated Find Discussion
Fifteen isolated finds were identified during the survey (Table 9). Their locations are shown in Figure
8. Of these isolated finds, two are historic and 13 are prehistoric. The historic isolates consist of brick, metal,
and glass. None of the historic isolates can be dated to a specific time period. The prehistoric isolates consist
of metavolcanic, quartz, and chert debitage, residual and cord marked sherds. None of the lithic artifacts are
culturally diagnostic. The ceramic sherds cannot be identified by specific type and can only be affiliated with
the general Woodland Period. In all instances, supplemental shovel testing at these resources was conducted
at 15 meter intervals, but no more than two artifacts were identified. These isolated finds do not retain
sufficient data to address current research issues pertaining to the history or prehistory ofthe region. Therefore,
all 15 isolated finds are recommended not eligible for the NRHP.
Table 9. Summary of Isolated Finds Identified in the Williamsburg Expansion Tracts.
Isolate Number
Description
Comment
31ON1842
cord marked sherd, coarse sand temper
Woodland
31ON1843
chert flake /flake fragment
31ON1844
quartz flake /flake fragment
31ON1845
quartz flake /flake fragment
31ON1846
quartz flake /flake fragment
31ON1847
metavolcanic flake /flake fragment
31ON1848
quartz flake /flake fragment
31ON1849
1 cord marked sherd with fine /medium sand temper
1 quartz flake /flake fragment
Woodland
31ON1850
1 residual sherd
1 metavolcanic flake /flake fragment
Woodland
31 N1851
1 quartz flake /flake fragment
1 quartz cobble fragment
31ON1852
2 residual sherds
Woodland
40

Isolate Number
Description
Comment
31ON1853
1 metavolcanic flake /flake fragment
1 quartz flake /flake fragment
31ON1854 **
brick fragment, unidentified metal fragment
31ON1855 **
light olive green bottle glass
31ON1856
1 metavolcanic flake /flake fragment
1 chert flake /flake fragment
41

Chapter 4. Discussion and Recommendations
In October 2011, Archaeological Consultants of the Carolinas, Inc. (ACC), conducted an
archaeological reconnaissance of approximately 900 acres within the Williamsburg Plantation expansion tracts.
The reconnaissance survey identified approximately 314 aces ofuplands within the tract deemed to have a high
potential for archaeological remains. The subsequent archaeological survey of 314 -acres was conducted in
January and February 2012.
The archaeological survey resulted in the identification of 11 archaeological sites (31ON1831-
31ON1841) and 15 isolated finds (31ON1842- 31ON1856). Most ofthe archaeological sites and the isolated
finds are located along the edges of uplands and ridges overlooking a drainage or other water source (i.e.,
wetland). With the exception of isolates 31ON1843 and 31ON1855 * *, all resources are located within 100
meters of a water source. 31ON1843 and 31ON1855 ** are only slightly more distant at approximately 120
meters. Despite the numerous micro landforms extending from the uplands, only site 31 ON 1834 and Isolates
31 ON 1846, 31 ON 1847, 31 ON 1849 and 31 ON 1853 are located on these smaller landforms. The small size
ofthe landform, and correspondingly small size ofthe archaeological resources, may be indicative of short-term
camps related to hunting or resource procurement activities.
The archaeological sites all contain components dating to the Early, Middle, and/or Late Woodland
periods. Specifically there are one Early Woodland, six Middle Woodland, and one Early through Late
Woodland sites. These components are defined by the ceramic assemblages and include Hamp's Landing
(Early Woodland), Hanover (Middle Woodland), and Late Woodland (White Oak) series. Three sites can only
be placed within the general Woodland Period. The prehistoric isolated finds include unknown lithic and
general Woodland ceramic components. Two of the isolated finds are historic but cannot be dated to a specific
time period. In summary, the Williamsburg Plantation expansion tracts were used extensively throughout the
Woodland Period, with the most intensive occupation of the area dating to the Middle Woodland Period.
Native Americans living within the project tract likely made use of the abundant faunal and floral resources
made available by the presence of the New River and its associated wetlands.
Ten ofthe archaeological sites (31ON1831, 31ON1832, 31ON1834 -1841) and all ofthe isolated finds
do not retain sufficient deposits to address current research issues pertaining to the prehistory or history of the
region. No further work is advocated for these sites, and they are recommended not eligible for the NRHP.
Clearance to proceed with development is recommended for these areas.
Site 31 ON 1833, however, contains numerous diagnostic artifacts, deep deposits, and has the potential
for intact cultural features and good stratigraphic integrity. This site has the potential to address research
issues pertaining to ceramic and lithic technology, as well as settlement patterns, of Woodland Period peoples.
Additional work is necessary to fully assess the research potential of the site. Therefore, we recommend site
31 ON 1833 be considered unassessed with regards to NRHP criteria. This site is located in an area where there
are currently no plans to develop and will be preserved in place. We recommend that consultations be held with
the North Carolina State Historic Preservation Office regarding the possible need for a Memorandum of
Agreement or other legal documentation (e.g., deed restrictions) to insure this site's protection into the future.
42

References Cited
Adovasio, J. M. and Jake Page
2002 The First Americans: In Pursuit ofArchaeology's Greatest Mystery. Random House, New
York.
Adovasio, J. M., Pedler J. Donahue, and R. Struckenrath
1998 Two Decades of Debate on Meadowcroft Rockshelter. North American Archaeologist
19:317 -41.
Anderson, David G. and Glen T. Hanson
1988 Early Archaic Settlement in the Southeastern United States: A Case Study from the Savannah
River Basin. American Antiquity 53:262 -286.
Anonymous
1950 Swansboro: The Friendly City by the Sea. Pamphlet on file, North Carolina State Library,
Raleigh.
Avirett, James B.
1901 The Old Plantation: How We Lived in Great House and Cabin Before the War. F.
Tennyson Neely Company, New York.
Barnhill, W.L.
1992 Soil Survey of Onslow County, North Carolina. United States Department of Agriculture,
Washington D.C.
Bonnichsen, Robson, Michael Waters, Dennis Stanford, and Bradley T. Lepper (editors)
2006 Paleoamerican Origins: Beyond Clovis. Texas A & M University Press, College Station.
Brown, Joseph Parsons
1960 The Commonwealth ofOnslow County History. The Owen G. Dunn Company, New Bern,
NC.
Carrington, Henry B.
1974 Battle Maps and Charts of the American Revolution. Arno Press, New York.
Cecelski, David
2000 A Historian's Coast Adventures into the Tidewater Past. John F. Blair, Winston Salem, NC.
43

Cleveland County Government (CCG)
2005 Battle of Kings Mountain. Electronic document, www.co.cleveland.nc.us /
battle—of kings_mountam.htm, accessed 2005.
Clemments, John
1988 North Carolina Facts. A Comprehensive Look at North Carolina Today, County by County.
Clements Research, Inc. Dallas, TX.
Coats, Melanie A.
1979 Cultural Resources Survey of SR 1470 (Western Blvd) Extension from US 17 to SR 1308
(Gum Branch Road), Onslow County, North Carolina. Manuscript on file at the North Carolina
Office of State Archaeology.
Coe, Joffre L.
1964 Formative Cultures of the Carolina Piedmont. Transactions of the American Philosophical
Society 54(5).
Corbitt, David Leroy
2000 The Formation of the North Carolina Counties 1663 -1943. Originally published 1950.
North Carolina Department of Cultural Resources, Raleigh.
Craig, Cynthia and Jim Sumner
1986 Venters Farm Historic District. National Register ofHistoric Places Nomination Form, Fall
1986. On file at the Survey and Planning Branch, State Historic Preservation Office, North
Carolina Office of Archives and History.
Delcourt, Hazel R., and Paul A. Delcourt
1985 Quaternary Palynology and Vegetational History of the Southeastern United States. In Pollen
Records ofLate- Quaternary North American Sediments, edited by V. M. Bryant, Jr., and R. G.
Holloway. American Association of Stratigraphic Palynologists Foundation.
Delcourt, Paul A., and Hazel R. Delcourt
1981 Vegetation Maps for Eastern North America: 400,000 B.P. to Present. In Geobotancy II,
edited by R. C. Romans. Plenum Publishing Corporation.
Dillehay, T.D. (editor)
1997 Monte Verde - A Late Pleistocene Settlement in Chile. Volume 1: The Archaeological
Context and Interpretations. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, DC.
Driver, J.C.
1998 Human Adaptation at the Pleistocene/Holocene Boundary m Western Canada, 11,000 to 9,000
FP. Quaternary International 49:141 -150.
Drucker, Lesley M. and Susan Jackson
1984 Shell in Motion: An Archaeological Study of Minim Island National register Site,
Georgetown County, South Carolina. Carolina Archaeological Services Resources Studies Series
73, Columbia, SC.
44

Espenshade, Christopher T. and Paul E. Brockington, Jr. (compilers)
1989 An Archaeological Study of the Minim Island Site: Early Woodland Dynamics in Coastal
South Carolina. Prepared for the US Army Corps of Engineers, Charleston District, Charleston,
South Carolina. Brockington and Associates, Inc., Atlanta, GA.
Gardner, William H.
1974 The Flint Run Paleo Indian Complex: A Preliminary Report 1971 through 1973 Seasons.
Catholic University of America, Archaeology Laboratory, Occasional Paper No. 1. Washington,
D.C.
1989 An Examination of Cultural Change in the Late Pleistocene and Early Holocene (ca. 9200 to
6800 B.C.). In Paleoindian Research in Virginia: A Synthesis, edited by J. Mark Wittkofski and
Theodore R. Reinhart, pp. 5 -52. Archaeological Society of Virginia.
John Gilbert, John and Grady Jefferys
1969 Crossties Through Carolina: The Story of North Carolinas Early Day Railroads. Helios
Press, Raleigh, NC.
Goodyear, Albert C.
1982 The Chronological Position of the Dalton Horizon in the Southeastern United States.
American Antiquity 47:382 -395.
2006 Evidence for Pre - Clovis Sites in the Eastern United States. In Paleoamerican Origins:
Beyond Clovis, edited by Robson Bonnichsen, Bradley T. Lepper, Dennis Stanford, and Michael
R. Waters, pp. 103 -112. Texas A & M University Press, College Station.
Griffin, James B.
1967 Culture Periods in Eastern United States Archaeology. In Archaeology of Eastern United
States, edited by J. B. Griffin. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL.
Greater Topsail Area Chamber of Commerce (GTACC)
2004 Onslow County. Electronic document, http:// www.topsailcoc.com /communities/
Onslow_County.asp, accessed 2004.
Hargrove, Thomas
1993 Archaeological Excavations at 31NH142, Hamp's Landing, River Road Park, New Hanover
County, North Carolina. Archaeological Research Consultants, Inc., Wilmington, NC.
Hargrove, Thomas and Jane Eastman
1997 Limestone- or Marl- tempered Pottery from the Lower Cape Fear River Region, New Hanover
County, North Carolina. North Carolina Archaeologist 46:91 -108.
Herbert, Joseph M. and Mark A. Mathis
1996 An Appraisal and Re- evaluation of the Prehistoric Pottery Sequence of Southern Coastal
North Carolina. In Indian Pottery of the Carolinas, edited by D.G. Anderson, pp. 136 -189.
Council of South Carolina Professional Archaeologists, Columbia.
45

Hill, Michael, editor
2007 The Governors of North Carolina. Office of Archives and History, North Carolina
Department of Cultural Resources, Raleigh.
Jackson, L.E., F.M. Philips, K. Shimamura, and E.C. Little
1997 Cosmogenic 36C 1 Dating ofthe Foothills Erractics Train, Alberta, Canada. Geology 125:73-
94.
Johnson, M. F.
1997 Additional Research at Cactus Hill: Preliminary Description of Northern Virginia Chapters
—ASV's 1993 and 1995 Excavations. In Archaeological Investigations ofSite 44SX202, Cactus
Hill, Sussex County, Virginia, edited by J. M. McAvoy and L. D. McAvoy, Appendix G.
Virginia Department of Historic Resources, Research Report Series No. 8, Richmond.
Jones, David C., Christopher T. Espenshade, and Linda Kennedy
1997 Archaeological Investigation at 31ON190, Cape Island, Onslow County, North Carolina.
Brockington and Associates, Inc., Charleston, SC.
Lilly, J. Paul
2012 Agricultural History of North Carolina. Electronic document,
http:// www. ncagr .gov /stats /general/history.htm, accessed March 2012.
Loftfield, Thomas C.
1975 Archaeological and Ethno- Historical Data Bearing on the Southern Boundary of Algonkian
Indian Occupation. In Papers of the Sixth Algonquian Conference, 1974, edited by W. Cowan,
pp. 100 -111. Canadian Ethnology Paper 423, National Museum of Canada Mercury Series.
1976 A Brief and True Report: An Archaeological Interpretation of the Southern Coast ofNorth
Carolina. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill.
1990 Ossuary Interments and Algonquian Expansion on the North Carolina Coast. Southeastern
Archaeology 9(2):116 -123.
Mathis, Mark A.
1995 The Carolina Algonkians: comments from the Fringe (the Southern Frontier). Paper presented
at the 27th Annual Meeting of the Algonquian Conference, Chapel Hill, NC.
1999 Oak Island: A Retiring Series. North Carolina Archaeology 48:18 -36.
McAvoy, J. M. And L. D. McAvoy, editors
1997 Archaeological Investigations of Site 44SX202, Cactus Hill, Sussex County, Virginia.
Virginia Department of Historic Resources, Research Report Series No. 8, Richmond.
McDonald, J. N.
2000 An Outline of the Pre - Clovis Archaeology of SV -2, Saltville, Virginia, with Speical Attention
to a Bone Tool Dated 14,510 yr B. P. Jeffersoniana 9:1 -59. Contributions from the Virginia
Museum of Natural History, Martinsville.
46

Meltzer, David J.
1988 Late Pleistocene Human Adaptations in Eastern North America. Journal of World Prehistory
2:1 -53.
Meltzer, D.J., D.K. Grayson, G. Ardila, A.W. Barker, D.F. Dincause, C.V. Haynes, F. Mena, L. Nunez, and
D. Stanford
1997 On the Pleistocene Antiquity of Monte Verde, Southern Chile. American Antiquity 44(1):172-
179.
National Park Service (NPS)
2005 Battle of Cowpens. Electronic document, http: / /www.nps.gov /cowp, accessed 2005.
Noel Hume, Ivor
1994 The Virginia Adventure: Roanoke to Jamestown, An Archaeological Odyssey. Alfred A.
Knopf, New York.
Oliver, Billy
1985 Tradition and Typology: Basic Elements of the Carolina Projectile Point Sequence. In
Structure and Process in Southeastern Archaeology, edited by Roy S. Dickens, Jr. and H.
Trawick Ward, pp. 195 -211. University of Alabama Press, Tuscaloosa.
Onslow County On -line (OCO)
2006 About Onslow County. Electronic document, http: / /www.co.onslow.nc.us /main/ about.htm.
Accessed March 10, 2012.
O'Steen, Lisa D.
1996 Paleoindian and Early Archaic Settlement along the Oconee Drainage. In The Paleoindian and
Early Archaic Southeast. David G. Anderson and Kenneth E. Sassaman, editors. University of
Alabama Press, Tuscaloosa.
Pezzoni, J. Daniel
1989 Richlands Historic District. National Register ofHistoric Places Registration Form, March
1989. On file at the Survey and Planning Branch, State Historic Preservation Office, North
Carolina Office of Archives and History.
1998 The Architectural History of Onslow County, North Carolina. Onslow County Museum,
Richlands, NC.
Phelps, David Sutton
1964 The Final Phases of the Eastern Archaic. Ph.D. dissertation, Department of Anthropology,
Tulane University, LA.
1981 The Archaeology of Colington Island. East Carolina University Archaeology Research
Report 3, Greenville, NC.
47

Phelps, David Sutton, continued
1983 Archaeology of the North Carolina Coast and Coastal Plain: Problems and Hypotheses. In
The Prehistory of North Carolina, edited by Mark A. Mathis and Jeffrey J. Crow. North
Carolina Division of Archives and History, Raleigh.
Piehl, C.
1979 White Society in the Black Belt, 1870 -1920, A Study of Four North Carolina Counties.
Unpublished Ph. D. Dissertation, Washington University, NC.
Polson, Mary Ellen and Claudia Brown
1989 Avirett- Stephens Plantation. National Register ofHistoric Places Registration Form, April
1989. On file at Survey and Planning Division of the North Carolina Department of Cultural
Resources, Raleigh.
Powell, William S.
1989 North Carolina Through Four Centuries. University of North Carolina Press, Raleigh.
Sassaman, Kenneth E.
1993 Early Pottery in the Southeast: Tradition and Innovation in Cooking Technology. The
University of Alabama Press, Tuscaloosa.
South, Stanley
1962 An Archaeological Survey of Two Islands in the White Oak River near Swansboro, North
Carolina." MS on file, North Carolina Office of State Archaeology, Raleigh.
1976 An Archaeological Survey of Southeastern Coastal North Carolina. The Institute of
Archaeology and Anthropology Notebook 8:1 -55. University of South Carolina, Columbia.
Stanford, Dennis, Robson Bonnichsen, Betty Meggers, and D. Gentry Steele
2006 Paleoamerican Origins: Models, Evidence, and Future Directions. InPaleoamerican Origins:
Beyond Clovis, edited by Robson Bonnichsen, Bradley T. Lepper, Dennis Stanford, and Michael
R. Waters, pp. 313 -353. Texas A & M University Press, College Station.
Townsend, Jan, John H. Sprinkle, Jr., and John Knoerl
1993 Guidelines for Evaluating and Registering Historical Archaeological Sites and Districts.
National Register Bulletin 36. National Park Service. United States Department of the Interior,
Washington, D.C.
Trinkley, Michael
1976 Paleoethnobotanical Remains from Archaic - Woodland Transitional Middens Along the South
Carolina Coast. Southeastern Archaeological Conference Bulletin 19:64 -67.
1980 Investigations of the Woodland Period Along the South Carolina Coast. Ph.D. dissertation,
University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, University Microfilms.
1990 An Archaeological Context for the South Carolina Woodland Period. Chicora Foundation
Research Series 22, Chicora Foundation, Inc., Columbia, SC.
48

Trotter, W.
1989 Ironclads and Columbiads. Signal Research, Greensboro, NC.
United States Department of Agriculture (USDA)
2012 Web Soil Survey. Electronic Document, http : / /websoilsurvey.nres.usda.gov /app /. Accessed
18 October 2011.
United States Geological Service (USGS)
1997 Jacksonville North, NC 7.5 minute topographic quadrangle.
Ward, H. Trawick
1983 A Review of Archaeology in the North Carolina Piedmont: A Study of Change. In The
Prehistory of North Carolina: An Archaeology Symposium, edited by Mark A. Mathis and
Jeffrey J. Crow, pp. 53 -81. North Carolina Division of Archives and History, Raleigh.
Ward, H. Trawick and R. P. Stephen Davis, Jr.
1999 Time Before History, The Archaeology of North Carolina. University of North Carolina
Press, Chapel Hill.
Watson, Alan D.
1979 Edgecombe County, A Brief History. North Carolina Division of Archives and History,
Raleigh.
1995 Onslow County: A BriefHistory. North Carolina Division of Archives and History, Raleigh.
York, D. H.
1992 National Register of Historic Places Nomination Form for the Tull - Worth- Holland Farm.
Ms. on file, North Carolina Division of Archives and History, Raleigh.
49

Appendix A. Artifact Catalog and Projectile Point Report
Provenience Techniques
Each location from which artifacts were recovered was assigned a unique provenience number. Numbers
after the decimal place designate a surface collection (e.g., 0), a general subsurface collection (e.g., 1), or a specific
level below surface (e.g., 1, 2, 3, 4, etc.)

Artifact Catalog
Williamsburg Plantation
Site Number:
31ON1831
Accession Number: 2012.0042
Provenience Number:
1.1
Site 1, N485 E500, 40 -60cm
Catalog Specimen
Number Number
Quantity
Weight (g)
Description
Comments
1 ml
1
0.1
Metavolcanic Flake /Flake Fragment
weighs < 0.1g, fine grained
Provenience Number:
2.1
Site 1, N500 E500,
TR 56 -9, ST 1, 20 -40cm
Catalog Specimen
Number Number
Quantity
Weight (g)
Description
Comments
1 p2
2
5.3
Fine /Medium Sand Temper Cord Marked
2- Woodland, 2 mend
Body Sherd
Site Number:
31ON1832
Accession Number: 2012.0043
Provenience Number:
1.1.
Site 2, N440 E485, 30 -50cm
Catalog Specimen
Number Number
Quantity
Weight (g)
Description
Comments
1 ml
1
0.2
Metavolcanic Flake /Flake Fragment
Provenience Number:
2.1
Site 2, N455 E500,
0 -20cm
Catalog Specimen
Number Number
Quantity
Weight (g)
Description
Comments
1 m2
1
1.7
Concretion
Provenience Number:
3.1
Site 2, N470 E485, 20 -30cm
Catalog Specimen
Number Number
Quantity
Weight (g)
Description
Comments
1 m3
1
0.6
Quartz Flake /Flake Fragment With Cortex
Provenience Number:
4.1
Site 2, N470 E500,
TR25 ST14, 0 -25cm
Catalog Specimen
Number Number
Quantity
Weight (g)
Description
Comments
1 m4
2
2.9
Metavolcanic Flake /Flake Fragment
Provenience Number:
5.1
Site 2, N485 E485, 50 -70cm
Catalog Specimen
Number Number
Quantity
Weight (g)
Description
Comments
1 m5
1
12.4
Metavolcanic Flake /Flake Fragment
large
Provenience Number:
6.1
Site 2, N500 E485, 0 -50cm
Catalog Specimen
Number Number
Quantity
Weight (g)
Description
Comments
1 p6
1
1.3
Residual Sherd
Hanover, UID decoration, grog
tempered with minimal coarse sand,
temper, possibly cord marked
2 m7
1
2.5
Quartz Flake /Flake Fragment With Cortex
Provenience Number:
7.1
Site 2, N500 E500,
TR25 ST13, 0 -25cm
Catalog Specimen
Number Number
Quantity
Weight (g)
Description
Comments
1 p8
1
6.9
Grog Temper Cord Marked Body Sherd
Hanover
2 m9
1
1.6
Quartz Flake /Flake Fragment With Cortex
Site Number:
31ON1833
Accession Number: 2012.0044
Provenience Number:
1.1
Site 3, N485 E500, 40 -50cm
Catalog Specimen
Number Number
Quantity
Weight (g)
Description
Comments
1 ml
1
0.3
Quartz Flake /Flake Fragment With Cortex
Page 1 of 11

Artifact Catalog
Provenience Number:
2.1
Site 3, N485 E530, 10 -35cm
Catalog
Specimen
Number
Number
Quantity
Weight (g)
Description
Comments
1
m2
1
0.2
Metavolcanic Flake /Flake Fragment
2
m3
1
0.4
Quartz Flake /Flake Fragment
3
p4
1
5.5
VCS /Granular Temper Fabric Impressed Body
with minimal grog inclusions,
Sherd
Woodland
4
p5
1
2.5
Residual Sherd
matches 2.1:3, Woodland
Provenience Number:
2.2
Site 3, N485 E530,
45 -55cm, possible feature
Catalog
Specimen
Number
Number
Quantity
Weight (g)
Description
Comments
1
m6
1
0.2
Quartz Flake /Flake Fragment
2
m7
1
5.9
Quartz Pebble
heat treated, has indentations, possible
fire cracked rock, tool?
3
eb8
0
1.1
Charcoal
4
p9
7
27.6
Grog Temper Fabric Impressed Rim Sherd
Hanover, rounded rims, 2 vessels, 1
includes 5 sherds that mend and have a
thin rim, the other includes 2 sherds
that mend and have a fabric impressed
interior and exterior
Provenience Number:
3.1
Site 3, N485 E545,
0 -30cm
Catalog
Specimen
Number
Number
Quantity
Weight (g)
Description
Comments
1
plo
6
9.3
Grog Temper Fabric Impressed Body Sherd
Hanover, 6 mend
2
P11
1
1.1
Residual Sherd
fine /medium sand temper, eroded,
Woodland
Provenience Number:
4.1
Site 3, N500 E485, 0 -30cm
Catalog
Specimen
Number
Number
Quantity
Weight (g)
Description
Comments
1
p12
2
4.2
Grog Temper Fabric Impressed Body Sherd
2- Hanover, 2 -mend, eroded exterior
Provenience Number:
5.1
Site 3, N500 E500,
0 -20cm
Catalog
Specimen
Number
Number
Quantity
Weight (g)
Description
Comments
1
p13
1
7.1
Very Coarse Sand Temper Cord Marked Rim
Woodland, possibly over stamped,
Sherd
most of lip broken off
2
m14
2
0.7
Quartz Flake /Flake Fragment With Cortex
2 with cortex
Provenience Number:
6.1
Site 3, N500 E515,
10 -60cm
Catalog
Specimen
Number
Number
Quantity
Weight (g)
Description
Comments
1
p15
2
3.6
Residual Sherd
1 -UID decoration and grog temper, 1-
fabric impressed with grog temper, 2-
Hanover
2
m16
2
3.6
Quartz Flake /Flake Fragment With Cortex
2 with cortex
Provenience Number:
7.1
Site 3, N500 E530,
TRl ST3, 20 -40cm
Catalog
Specimen
Number
Number
Quantity
Weight (g)
Description
Comments
1
p17
1
1.1
Grog Temper Fabric Impressed Rim Sherd
Hanover, scraped interior and exterior
Provenience Number:
8.1
Site 3, N500 E545,
0 -20cm
Catalog
Specimen
Number
Number
Quantity
Weight (g)
Description
Comments
1
p18
1
7
Grog Temper Fabric Impressed Body Sherd
Hanover, eroded exterior
Provenience Number:
9.1
Site 3, N515 E485, 0 -20cm
Catalog
Specimen
Number
Number
Quantity
Weight (g)
Description
Comments
Page 2 of 11

Artifact Catalog
1
m19
5
11.4
Clear Bottle Glass
Provenience Number:
10.1
Site 3, N515 E545,
0 -25cm
Catalog
Specimen
Number
Number
Quantity
Weight (g)
Description
Comments
1
p20
2
13.2
Grog Temper Fabric Impressed Rim Sherd
2- Hanover, 2 vessels, 1 with flattened
rim, fabric impressed lip, and
smoothed over surface, 1 with tapered
rim and tight weave.
Provenience Number:
11.1
Site 3, N530 E500,
20 -30cm
Catalog
Specimen
Number
Number
Quantity
Weight (g)
Description
Comments
1
p21
1
4.6
Grog Temper Fabric Impressed Body Sherd
Hanover, smoothed over
2
p22
5
11
Residual Sherd
5- Hanover, fabric impressed, smoothed
over and grog tempered, 3 -mend
Provenience Number:
12.1
Site 3, N530 E545,
0 -20cm
Catalog
Specimen
Number
Number
Quantity
Weight (g)
Description
Comments
1
m23
3
1
Quartz Flake /Flake Fragment With Cortex
1 with cortex
Provenience Number:
13.1
Site 3, N537 N505, TR2 ST1 0 -70cm
Catalog
Specimen
Number
Number
Quantity
Weight (g)
Description
Comments
1
m24
2
5.3
Quartz Flake /Flake Fragment With Cortex
2 with cortex
2
p25
1
0.6
Residual Sherd
cord marked? Hanover
Provenience Number:
14.1
Site 3, N545 E500,
0 -20cm
Catalog
Specimen
Number
Number
Quantity
Weight (g)
Description
Comments
1
p26
1
3.1
Grog Temper UID Decoration Body Sherd
Hanover, cord marked ?, fabric
impressed ?, smoothed over exterior
Provenience Number:
15.1
Site 3, N545 E545m
0 -20cm
Catalog
Specimen
Number
Number
Quantity
Weight (g)
Description
Comments
1
m27
2
0.5
Quartz Flake /Flake Fragment With Cortex
1 with cortex
Provenience Number:
16.1
Site 3, N560 E485, 10 -50cm
Catalog
Specimen
Number
Number
Quantity
Weight (g)
Description
Comments
1
p28
1
3.3
Grog Temper Fabric Impressed Rim Sherd
Hanover
2
p29
1
3.4
Grog Temper Fabric Impressed Body Sherd
smoothed interior, tight weave,
Hanover
3
p30
1
3.8
Grog Temper UID Decoration Body Sherd
exterior mostly spalled, smoothed
interior, likely fabric impressed,
Hanover
4
p31
2
2
Residual Sherd
Woodland
5
p32
4
2.9
Chert Flake /Flake Fragment With Cortex
1 with cortex and heat treated, 3 -white
6
m33
1
0.2
Metavolcanic Flake /Flake Fragment
likely Rhyolite
Provenience Number:
17.1
Site 3, N560 E500,
0 -20cm
Catalog
Specimen
Number
Number
Quantity
Weight (g)
Description
Comments
1
p34
1
10
Grog Temper Fabric Impressed Body Sherd
interior smoothed, tight weave,
Hanover
Provenience Number:
18.1
Site 3, N560 E545,
20 -35cm
Catalog
Specimen
Number
Number
Quantity
Weight (g)
Description
Comments
1
p35
1
10.9
Grog Temper Fabric Impressed Rim Sherd
rounded rim, Hanover
Page 3 of 11

Artifact Catalog
2
p36
1
3.2
Grog Temper UID Decoration Body Sherd
smoothed over interior and exterior,
Hanover
3
p37
2
2.1
Residual Sherd
2 -grog tempered, uid decoration, likely
fabric impressed, 2- Hanover
Provenience Number:
19.1
Site 3, N560 E560,
0 -30cm
Catalog
Specimen
Number
Number
Quantity
Weight (g)
Description
Comments
1
p38
1
2.1
Limestone /Sand Temper Fabric Impressed
limestone and fine sand tempered,
Body Sherd
Hamps Landing
2
p39
6
16.7
Coarse Sand Temper Fabric Impressed Body
interior scraped, 5 mend, 1 with
Sherd
organic impressions on exterior,
Woodland
3
p40
2
2
Residual Sherd
2 -grog tempered, UID decoration,
likely fabric impressed, 2- Hanover
Provenience Number:
20.1
Site 3, N560 E575,
0 -30cm
Catalog
Specimen
Number
Number
Quantity
Weight (g)
Description
Comments
1
041
1
26.1
Grog Temper Fabric Impressed Body Sherd
Hanover, has ferruginous inclusions
2
p42
2
2.3
Residual Sherd
2- fabric impressed, 1- Hanover with
grog temper, 1- Woodland, possibly
Hamps Landing with limestone and
grog temper that matches 19.1:1,
3
m43
2
4.9
Quartz Flake /Flake Fragment With Cortex
1 primary flake with cortex
Provenience Number:
21.1
Site 3, N560 E590,
0 -15cm
Catalog
Specimen
Number
Number
Quantity
Weight (g)
Description
Comments
1
m44
1
0.7
Quartz Flake /Flake Fragment
Provenience Number:
22.1
Site 3, N575 E545,
0 -20cm
Catalog
Specimen
Number
Number
Quantity
Weight (g)
Description
Comments
1
p45
1
2.2
Residual Sherd
coarse sand temper, fabric impressed,
Woodland
Provenience Number:
23.1
Site 3, N590 E500,
0 -20cm
Catalog
Specimen
Number
Number
Quantity
Weight (g)
Description
Comments
1
p46
1
8.1
Grog Temper Cord Marked Body Sherd
Hanover
2
p47
1
5.5
Grog Temper Fabric Impressed Body Sherd
scraped interior, Hanover
Provenience Number:
24.1
Site 3, N590 E545,
0 -20cm
Catalog
Specimen
Number
Number
Quantity
Weight (g)
Description
Comments
1
m48
1
0.3
Quartz Flake /Flake Fragment With Cortex
Provenience Number:
25.1
Site 3, N590 E560,
0 -30cm
Catalog
Specimen
Number
Number
Quantity
Weight (g)
Description
Comments
1
p49
2
6.7
Grog Temper Fabric Impressed Body Sherd
1 with small amount of very coarse
sand temper, 1 with incision? over
fabric impressed surface, 2- Hanover
2
p50
1
0.7
Residual Sherd
UID decoration with grog temper,
Hanover
3
m51
3
2.2
Quartz Flake /Flake Fragment With Cortex
3 with cortex, 1 ofthese is a primary
flake
4
m52
1
0.2
Chert Flake /Flake Fragment
Provenience Number:
26.1
Site 3, N590 E575,
0 -30cm
Catalog
Specimen
Number
Number
Quantity
Weight (g)
Description
Comments
Page 4 of 11

Artifact Catalog
1
p53
1
6.7
Grog Temper UID Decoration Rim Sherd
scraped interior, possibly cord marked,
exterior smoothed over, folded over
rim, Hanover
2
p54
3
5.5
Residual Sherd
3 UID decoration, 2- Woodland, 1
possibly net impressed with fine sand
and grog? temper, and 1 with coarse
sand temper, 1- Hanover with grog
temper
3
m55
1
0.2
Quartz Flake /Flake Fragment With Cortex
Provenience Number:
27.1
Site 3, N605 E500,
ceramics 0 -20cm, lithics 0 -60cm
Catalog
Specimen
Number
Number
Quantity
Weight (g)
Description
Comments
1
p56
1
2.4
Grog Temper UID Decoration Rim Sherd
smoothed over exterior, flat rim,
Hanover
2
p57
1
15.4
Grog Temper Fabric Impressed Body Sherd
Hanover
3
p58
1
23.3
Grog Temper UID Decoration Body Sherd
smoothed over exterior, sooting/residue
on interior, possibly fabric impressed,
Hanover
4
m59
3
0.9
Metavolcanic Flake /Flake Fragment With
likely Rhyolite, very fine grained, 1
Cortex
with cortex
Provenience Number:
28.1
Site 3, N605 E575,
0 -20cm
Catalog
Specimen
Number
Number
Quantity
Weight (g)
Description
Comments
1
p60
2
1.8
Residual Sherd
2 mend, 2 -White Oak
2
m61
1
2.7
Quartz Flake /Flake Fragment With Cortex
Provenience Number:
29.1
Site 3, N620 E500,
20 -30cm
Catalog
Specimen
Number
Number
Quantity
Weight (g)
Description
Comments
1
p62
3
20.4
Grog Temper Fabric Impressed Body Sherd
2 match and have sooting/residue on
interior and exterior, 3- Hanover
Provenience Number:
30.1
Site 3, N620 E530,
0 -20cm
Catalog
Specimen
Number
Number
Quantity
Weight (g)
Description
Comments
1
p63
1
7.4
Shell Temper UID Decoration Body Sherd
possibly cord marked, White Oak
Provenience Number:
31.1
Site 3, N635 E500,
0 -20cm
Catalog
Specimen
Number
Number
Quantity
Weight (g)
Description
Comments
1
p64
1
2.8
Residual Sherd
medium sand temper, UID decoration,
possibly cord marked with incising ?,
Woodland
Provenience Number:
32.1
Site 3, N665 E500,
lithic 0 -15cm, sherds 0 -25cm
Catalog
Specimen
Number
Number
Quantity
Weight (g)
Description
Comments
1
p65
2
19.3
Grog Temper Cord Marked Body Sherd
with some granular and possibly fiber
inclusions, over stamped cord marked,
hard paste, Hanover
2
m66
1
0.4
Quartz Flake /Flake Fragment With Cortex
Provenience Number:
33.1
Site 3, N665 E515,
0 -15cm
Catalog
Specimen
Number
Number
Quantity
Weight (g)
Description
Comments
1
p67
1
8.5
Grog Temper Fabric Impressed Body Sherd
scraped interior, Hanover
Provenience Number:
34.1
Site 3, N665 E530,
0 -15cm
Catalog
Specimen
Number
Number
Quantity
Weight (g)
Description
Comments
Page 5 of 11

Artifact Catalog
1 p68
1
3.1
Grog Temper UID Decoration Body Sherd
with some fine sand in temper,
sooting/residue on interior, smoothed
over exterior, Hanover
Provenience Number:
35.1
Site 3, N680 E515,
0 -15cm
Catalog Specimen
Number Number
Quantity
Weight (g)
Description
Comments
1 p69
1
3.4
Fine Sand Temper Fabric Impressed Body
with some grog temper, Hanover
Sherd
Site Number:
31ON1834
Accession Number: 2012.0045
Provenience Number:
1.1
Site 4, N500 E440, 0 -15cm
Catalog Specimen
Number Number
Quantity
Weight (g)
Description
Comments
1 ml
1
1.6
Quartz Flake /Flake Fragment With Cortex
Provenience Number:
2.1
Site 4, N500 E455, 0 -15cm
Catalog Specimen
Number Number
Quantity
Weight (g)
Description
Comments
1 m2
1
0.5
Quartz Flake /Flake Fragment
Provenience Number:
3.1
Site 4, N500 E485, 0 -30cm
Catalog Specimen
Number Number
Quantity
Weight (g)
Description
Comments
1 p3
1
1.1
Residual Sherd
Woodland
Provenience Number:
4.1
Site 4, N500 E500,
J ST101, offsewer line, 0 -40cm
Catalog Specimen
Number Number
Quantity
Weight (g)
Description
Comments
1 a4
1
5.8
Translucent Quartz P. Point Fragment
Site Number:
31ON1835
Accession Number: 2012.0046
Provenience Number:
1.1
Site 7, N470 E510, TR2 ST3, 0 -15cm
Catalog Specimen
Number Number
Quantity
Weight (g)
Description
Comments
1 P1
1
6.3
Fine Sand Temper Fabric Impressed Body
with ferruginous inclusions in the paste
Sherd
that leached out to create sm. Holes,
Woodland
2 p2
1
2
Fine Sand Temper UID Decoration Rim Sherd
rolled rim, body broken off, almost
untempered, Woodland
Provenience Number:
2.1
Site 7, N500 E500,
TR3 ST2, 20 -40cm
Catalog Specimen
Number Number
Quantity
Weight (g)
Description
Comments
1 m3
1
0.8
Metavolcanic Flake /Flake Fragment
possibly chert?
Site Number:
31ON1836
Accession Number: 2012.0047
Provenience Number:
1.1
Site 10, N425 E500, 0 -30cm
Catalog Specimen
Number Number
Quantity
Weight (g)
Description
Comments
1 pl
1
1.3
Fine Sand Temper Fabric Impressed Body
interior surface spalled off, possibly
Sherd
some grog inclusions, Woodland
Provenience Number:
2.1
Site 10, N440
E500, 20 -30cm
Catalog Specimen
Number Number
Quantity
Weight (g)
Description
Comments
1 m2
5
2.2
Quartz Flake /Flake Fragment
Provenience Number:
3.1
Site 10, N455
E500, 30 -40cm
Catalog Specimen
Number Number
Quantity
Weight (g)
Description
Comments
1 p3
2
4.5
Grog Temper Cord Marked Rim Sherd
cord marking on lip and body, scraped
interior, 2 mend, Hanover
Page 6 of 11

Artifact Catalog
2
p4
1
1.2
Residual Sherd
over stamped cord marked, grog and
coarse sand tempered, Hanover
3
m5
1
10.1
Fired Clay Other
with very coarse sand temper
Provenience Number:
4.1
Site 10, N470
E500, sherds 30 -40cm, lithics 0 -50cm
Catalog
Specimen
Number
Number
Quantity
Weight (g)
Description
Comments
1
p6
1
8.1
Coarse /VC Sand Temper Net Impressed Body
Woodland
Sherd
2
p7
2
3.2
Residual Sherd
2- Woodland, 1- fabric impressed with
fst, 1- net impressed with coarse sand
temper
3
m8
1
0.3
Metavolcanic Flake /Flake Fragment
Provenience Number:
5.1
Site 10, N470
E515, TR17 ST4, 0 -20cm
Catalog
Specimen
Number
Number
Quantity
Weight (g)
Description
Comments
1
p9
1
4.6
Very Coarse Sand Temper UID Decoration
likely net impressed, interior scraped,
Body Sherd
organic material in paste, Woodland
Provenience Number:
6.1
Site 10, N485
E500, 0 -30cm
Catalog
Specimen
Number
Number
Quantity
Weight (g)
Description
Comments
1
mlo
2
1.1
Metavolcanic Flake /Flake Fragment
Provenience Number:
7.1
Site 10, N500
E500, TR18 STS, 0 -25cm
Catalog
Specimen
Number
Number
Quantity
Weight (g)
Description
Comments
1
P11
1
3.8
Grog/Fine Sand Temper Net Impressed Body
Hanover
Sherd
2
p12
1
1.3
Residual Sherd
Woodland
Provenience Number:
8.1
Site 10, N500
E515, 0 -30cm
Catalog
Specimen
Number
Number
Quantity
Weight (g)
Description
Comments
1
p13
1
2.9
Medium Sand Temper Fabric Impressed Body
Woodland
Sherd
2
m14
2
1.4
Quartz Flake /Flake Fragment
Provenience Number:
9.1
Site 10, N515
E515, 0 -20cm
Catalog
Specimen
Number
Number
Quantity
Weight (g)
Description
Comments
1
p15
1
1.4
Residual Sherd
Fabric impressed with coarse sand
temper, Woodland
Provenience Number:
10.1
Site 10, N530
E515, 0 -20cm
Catalog
Specimen
Number
Number
Quantity
Weight (g)
Description
Comments
1
p16
2
5.2
Residual Sherd
cord marked ?, with coarse /very coarse
sand temper, Woodland
Site Number:
31ON1837
Accession Number: 2012.0048
Provenience Number:
1.1
Site 12, N500 E500, TR3 ST4, 0 -25cm
Catalog
Specimen
Number
Number
Quantity
Weight (g)
Description
Comments
1
pl
1
7.1
Grog/Coarse Sand Temper UID Decoration
cord marked? fabric impressed ?,
Body Sherd
smoothed over exterior, Hanover
Provenience Number:
2.1
Site 12, N515
E455, 0 -20cm
Catalog
Specimen
Number
Number
Quantity
Weight (g)
Description
Comments
1
p2
1
7.8
Fine Sand Temper Cord Marked Body Sherd
Woodland
Page 7 of 11

Artifact Catalog
Provenience Number:
3.1
Site 12, N515 E470, 0 -60cm
Catalog
Specimen
Number
Number
Quantity
Weight (g)
Description
Comments
1
m3
2
1.1
Metavolcanic Flake /Flake Fragment
Provenience Number:
4.1
Site 12, N530
E470, 30 -50cm
Catalog
Specimen
Number
Number
Quantity
Weight (g)
Description
Comments
1
p4
1
4.9
Grog Temper Cord Marked Body Sherd
shell scraped interior, Hanover
Provenience Number:
5.1
Site 12, N530
E500, 20 -60cm
Catalog
Specimen
Number
Number
Quantity
Weight (g)
Description
Comments
1
p5
1
2
Residual Sherd
Woodland
2
m6
1
0.2
Metavolcanic Flake /Flake Fragment
3
m7
1
0.2
Quartz Flake /Flake Fragment With Cortex
Provenience Number:
6.1
Site 12, N545
E465, TR2 ST3, 0 -30cm
Catalog
Specimen
Number
Number
Quantity
Weight (g)
Description
Comments
1
p8
2
3
Residual Sherd
2- Woodland, 1 simple stamped with
coarse sand temper
2
m9
1
63.6
Quartz Shatter With Cortex
possibly core fragment
Site Number:
31ON1838
Accession Number: 2012.0049
Provenience Number:
1.1
Site 13, N500 E500, TR2 ST6, 0 -30cm
Catalog
Specimen
Number
Number
Quantity
Weight (g)
Description
Comments
1
ml
3
1.7
Quartz Flake /Flake Fragment With Cortex
1 with cortex
Provenience Number:
2.1
Site 13, N500
E515, 20 -40cm
Catalog
Specimen
Number
Number
Quantity
Weight (g)
Description
Comments
1
p2
1
3.3
Fine Sand Temper Fabric Impressed Body
Woodland
Sherd
2
m3
1
1.2
Quartz Flake /Flake Fragment With Cortex
with cobble cortex
Provenience Number:
3.1
Site 13, N515
E470, 0 -30cm
Catalog
Specimen
Number
Number
Quantity
Weight (g)
Description
Comments
1
p4
1
2.9
Limestone /Sand Temper Fabric Impressed
with fst, Hamps Landing
Body Sherd
2
m5
1
3.6
Quartz Flake /Flake Fragment With Cortex
primary flake with cobble cortex
Provenience Number:
4.1
Site 13, N515
E500, 0 -15cm
Catalog
Specimen
Number
Number
Quantity
Weight (g)
Description
Comments
1
p6
1
2.3
Limestone /Sand Temper UID Decoration
with c /vcst, Hamps Landing
Body Sherd
Provenience Number:
5.1
Site 13, N530
E500, 0 -15cm
Catalog
Specimen
Number
Number
Quantity
Weight (g)
Description
Comments
1
p7
1
4.9
Medium Sand Temper Cord Marked Body
Woodland
Sherd
Site Number:
31ON1839
Accession Number: 2012.0050
Provenience Number:
1.1
Site 14, N500 E485, 0 -20cm
Catalog
Specimen
Number
Number
Quantity
Weight (g)
Description
Comments
1
P1
1
1.8
Residual Sherd
fabric impressed, grog tempered,
Hanover
Page 8 of II

Artifact Catalog
Provenience Number:
2.1
Site 14, N500 E500, TR13 ST1, 0 -30cm
Catalog Specimen
Number Number
Quantity
Weight (g)
Description
Comments
1 p2
1
5
Grog/Coarse Sand Temper UID Decoration
possibly fabric impressed, some fiber
Body Sherd
in temper, Hanover
2 p3
1
0.5
Residual Sherd
Woodland
3 m4
1
9.3
Quartz Cobble Fragment With Cortex
Provenience Number:
3.1
Site 14, N515
E530, Judgemental ST1 20 -60cm
Catalog Specimen
Number Number
Quantity
Weight (g)
Description
Comments
1 m5
3
0.6
Metavolcanic Flake /Flake Fragment
2 likely Rhyolite
Site Number:
31ON1840
Accession Number: 2012.0051
Provenience Number:
1.1
Site 15, N500 E500, TR15, ST1, 0 -20cm
Catalog Specimen
Number Number
Quantity
Weight (g)
Description
Comments
1 pl
3
11.4
Grog Temper Fabric Impressed Body Sherd
2 mend, Hanover
Site Number:
31ON1841
Accession Number: 2012.0052
Provenience Number:
1.1
Site 16, N470 E500, 0 -30cm
Catalog Specimen
Number Number
Quantity
Weight (g)
Description
Comments
1 pl
1
4.2
Grog Temper Fabric Impressed Body Sherd
Hanover
Provenience Number:
2.1
Site 16, N500
E500, TR3 ST6, 0 -20cm
Catalog Specimen
Number Number
Quantity
Weight (g)
Description
Comments
1 p2
3
2.6
Residual Sherd
2 -mend and have fine cord marking
and possible grog tempering, 1 has
UID decoration and grog temper, 3-
Hanover
Provenience Number:
3.1
Site 16, N515,
E500, 0 -20cm
Catalog Specimen
Number Number
Quantity
Weight (g)
Description
Comments
1 p3
1
12.3
Grog Temper Fabric Impressed Body Sherd
Hanover
2 p4
1
1.4
Residual Sherd
UID decoration, and grog temper,
Hanover
Site Number:
31ON1842
Accession Number: 2012.0053
Provenience Number:
1.1
Isolate 1, N500 E500, MOJ 1, 0 -20cm
Catalog Specimen
Number Number
Quantity
Weight (g)
Description
Comments
1 pl
1
19.7
Coarse Sand Temper Cord Marked Body Sherd
very deptford like, Cape Fear/New
River
Site Number:
31ON1843
Accession Number: 2012.0054
Provenience Number:
1.1
Isolate 2, N500 E500, TR24 ST1 1, 0 -20cm
Catalog Specimen
Number Number
Quantity
Weight (g)
Description
Comments
1 ml
1
0.7
Chert Flake /Flake Fragment
possible fine grained metavolcanic
Site Number:
31ON1844
Accession Number: 2012.0055
Provenience Number:
1.1
Isolate 3, N500 E500, TR106 ST4, 0 -20cm
Catalog Specimen
Number Number
Quantity
Weight (g)
Description
Comments
1 ml
1
2.4
Quartz Flake /Flake Fragment With Cortex
with cobble cortex
Site Number:
31ON1845
Accession Number: 2012.0056
Page 9 of 11

Artifact Catalog
Provenience Number:
1.1
Isolate 4, N500 E500, TR9 ST3, 0 -20cm
Catalog Specimen
Number Number
Quantity
Weight (g) Description
Comments
1 ml
1
0.3 Quartz Flake /Flake Fragment
cultural?
Site Number:
31ON1846 Accession Number:
2012.0057
Provenience Number:
1.1
Isolate 5, N500 E500, TR26 ST4, 0 -30cm
Catalog Specimen
Number Number
Quantity
Weight (g) Description
Comments
1 ml
1
3.2 Quartz Flake /Flake Fragment With Cortex possible utilized edge, possible tool?
Site Number:
31ON1847 Accession Number:
2012.0058
Provenience Number:
1.1
Isolate 6, N500 E500, Judgemental ST101, 30 -50cm
Catalog Specimen
Number Number
Quantity
Weight (g) Description
Comments
1 ml
1
0.2 Metavolcanic Flake /Flake Fragment
likely Rhyolite
Site Number:
3ION1848 Accession Number:
2012.0059
Provenience Number:
1.1
Isolate 7, N500 E500, TR15 ST2, 30 -40cm
Catalog Specimen
Number Number
Quantity
Weight (g) Description
Comments
1 ml
1
0.4 Quartz Flake /Flake Fragment With Cortex
Site Number:
31ON1849 Accession Number:
2012.0060
Provenience Number:
1.1
Isolate 8, N500 E500, Judgemental ST JX, 0 -30cm
Catalog Specimen
Number Number
Quantity
Weight (g) Description
Comments
1 pl
1
9.4 Fine /Medium Sand Temper Cord Marked
overstamped, fine cord marking, Cape
Body Sherd
Fear /New River
Provenience Number:
2.1
Isolate 8, N515 E500, 0 - -30cm
Catalog Specimen
Number Number
Quantity
Weight (g) Description
Comments
1 m2
1
0.1 Quartz Flake /Flake Fragment
Site Number:
31ON1850 Accession Number:
2012.0061
Provenience Number:
1.1
Isolate 9, N485 E500, 0 -30cm
Catalog Specimen
Number Number
Quantity
Weight (g) Description
Comments
1 pl
1
0.8 Residual Sherd
fine /medium sand and shell? temper,
UID decoration, possibly fabric
impressed, Woodland, possibly White
Oak
Provenience Number:
2.1
Isolate 9, N500 E500, TR5 ST1, 0 -25cm
Catalog Specimen
Number Number
Quantity
Weight (g) Description
Comments
1 m2
1
0.8 Metavolcanic Flake /Flake Fragment
Site Number:
3ION1851 Accession Number:
2012.0062
Provenience Number:
1.1
Isolate 10, N500 E500, Judgemental ST X -J -1
Catalog Specimen
Number Number
Quantity
Weight (g) Description
Comments
1 ml
1
0.9 Quartz Flake /Flake Fragment With Cortex with cobble cortex
2 m2
1
7.3 Quartz Cobble Fragment
Site Number:
31ON1852 Accession Number:
2012.0063
Provenience Number:
1.1
Isolate 11, N500 E500, TR20 STS, 20 -30cm
Catalog Specimen
Number Number
Quantity
Weight (g) Description
Comments
Page 10 of 11

Artifact Catalog
1 pl
2 4.4
Residual Sherd
2- Woodland, 1 -plain with fine sand
temper, 1- fabric impressed with coarse
sand temper
Site Number:
31ON1853
Accession Number:
2012.0064
Provenience Number:
1.1 Isolate 12, N480 E515, TR15 ST3, 0 -20cm
Catalog Specimen
Number Number
Quantity Weight (g)
Description
Comments
1 ml
1 1.3
Metavolcanic Flake /Flake Fragment
1 likely Rhyolite
Provenience Number:
2.1 Isolate 12, N500 E500. TR16 ST2, 0 -20cm
Catalog Specimen
Number Number
Quantity Weight (g)
Description
Comments
1 m2
1 1.1
Quartz Flake /Flake Fragment
Site Number:
310N1854 **
Accession Number:
2012.0065
Provenience Number:
1.1 Isolate 13, N500 E500m TR21 ST2, 0 -20cm
Catalog Specimen
Number Number
Quantity Weight (g)
Description
Comments
1 ml
0 20.9
Brick Fragment
2 m2
1 1
UID Metal Unidentified Form
iron, likely nail fragment
Site Number:
310N1855 **
Accession Number:
2012.0066
Provenience Number:
1.1 Isolate 14, N500 E500, TRl l ST2, 0 -15cm
Catalog Specimen
Number Number
Quantity Weight (g)
Description
Comments
1 ml
1 0.3
Light Olive Green Bottle Glass
frosted interior and exterior
Site Number:
31ON1856
Accession Number:
2012.0067
Provenience Number:
1.0 Isolate 15, N500 E500, power line, surface
Catalog Specimen
Number Number
Quantity Weight (g)
Description
Comments
1 ml
1 0.3
Metavolcanic Flake /Flake Fragment
2 m2
1 0.6
Chert Flake /Flake Fragment
Page 11 of 11

PPK Fragment Report
Site Number 31ON1834
Provenience: Cat 4.1 1
Lithic Material Translucent Quartz
General Measurements
Length
28.6 mm
Width
20.7 mm
Weight
5.8 g
Fracture Type
Unknown
Fragment Type
Body
Base Type
Unknown
low
Comments: possibly base broken off and retouched
into thin straight base with basal
thinning, has pentagonal shape but is thick
Page 1 of 1

Appendix S. Resume of Principal Investigator

Bobby Gerald Southerlin
Archaeological Consultants of the Carolinas, Inc.
121 East First Street
Clayton, NC 27520
(919) 553 -9007
Email: bobbysoutherlin @archcon.org
PROFESSIONAL POSITIONS
CEO, Archaeological Consultants of the Carolinas, Inc.
Senior Archaeologist, Principal Investigator, Field Director, Zooarchaeologist
AREAS OF SPECIALIZATION
Archaeological Field Investigation Methods
Material Culture Replication (lithics and ceramics)
EDUCATION
M.A. in Anthropology, University of Georgia, 1993.
B.A. in Anthropology, University of South Carolina, 1988.
PROFESSIONAL ORGANIZATION MEMBERSHIP
North Carolina Archaeological Society Society for American Archaeology
North Carolina Professional Council Archaeological Society of South Carolina
Georgia Council of Professional Archaeologists Southeastern Archaeological Conference Society
CULTURAL RESOURCE SURVEYS (Phase I) and ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITE TESTING (Phase II)
Utility Corridors for ANR Pipeline Company (Detroit), Georgia Power Company (Atlanta), Duke Power
Company (Charlotte), Oglethorpe Power Corporation, and Transco Pipeline Company (Houston).
Transportation Corridors for Georgia Department of Transportation (Atlanta), South Carolina Department
of Transportation (Columbia)
Development Tracts for Consolidated Government of the City of Columbus /Muscogee County (Georgia),
Macon County (North Carolina), U.S. Corps of Engineers (Savannah and Mobile Districts), U.S. Forest
Service (South Carolina), South Carolina Electric and Gas Company (Columbia), and various private
developers (Georgia and South Carolina)
ARCHAEOLOGICAL DATA RECOVERY (Phase III)
Prehistoric village (31 ON 1578) and late 18`h /early 19`h century plantation (31 ON 1582) for R.A. Management,
Charlotte, NC
Three prehistoric sites (38HR243, 38HR254, and 38HR258) in Horry County, South Carolina for Tidewater
Plantation and Golf Club (Myrtle Beach, S.C.)
Two Prehistoric sites (38LX50 and 38LX141) in Lexington County, South Carolina for the South Carolina
Department of Transportation
** A detailed listing of individual projects and publications is available upon request

Williamsburg
Final
I
Plantation Development - IP Submittal
JD Wetlands - October 24, 2012
Northern Tract &Pelletier Tract (NRCS Soils Data)
Tract Boundary in Project Scope
= Proposed Lot Layout - FUTURE
Wetland Delineation - FINAL Recorded JD
= Previous Phases of Development
NRCS Soil Types
L BaB - Baymeade fine sand
K: CrB - Craven fine sandy loam
= CrC - Craven fine sandy loam
Da - Dorovan muck
r GoA - Goldsboro fine sandy loam
K: GpB - Goldsboro -Urban land complex
C Ly - Lynchburg fine sandy loam
C MaC - Marvyn loamy fine sand
Pa - Pactolus fine sand
I To - Torhunta fine sandy loam
0 400 800 1,600 2,400 3,200 4,000 4,800 5,600
Fe
is
(map scale 1" = 800')
Gum Branch Rd (SR 1308)
J
7
Williamsburg Pkwy T
n
YAW
'L
WWI pIUti0is
NOTE: All boundaries and distances as shown are considered approximate.
A PLS survey of delineated areas and review and approval by the
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers is required prior to specific site planning.

Williamsburg Plantation Development - IP Submittal
Final JD Wetlands - October 24, 2012
Southern Tract &Pelletier Tract (NRCS Soils Data)
[New River Floodplain
vi Etl solnt15ns
An
m
r.1
m
in
1
EVANS1111111� Mai
400 800 1,600 2,400 3,200 4,000 4,800 5,600 Feet (map scale 1" = 800')
11�
Y
Tract Boundary in Project Scope
0 Proposed Lot Layout - FUTURE
Wetland Delineation - FINAL Recorded JD
0 Previous Phases of Development
M BaB - Baymeade fine sand
CrB - Craven fine sandy loam
0 CrC - Craven fine sandy loam
Da - Dorovan muck
C GoA - Goldsboro fine sandy loam
GpB - Goldsboro -Urban land complex
0 Ly - Lynchburg fine sandy loam
0 MaC - Marvyn loamy fine sand
Pa - Pactolus fine sand
To - Torhunta fine sandy loam
NOTE: All boundaries and distances as shown are considered approximate.
A PLS survey of delineated areas and review and approval by the
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers is required prior to specific site planning.

Williamsburg Plantation Development - IP Submittal
Final JD Wetlands - October 24, 2012
Northern Tract, Southern Tract & Pelletier Tract
Watershed Drainage Areas for Rapanos Forms
Drainage Area #1 = 238 Acres Inside Tracts; 606 Acres Total Watershed
r
Drainage Area #2 = 86 Acres Inside Tracts; 259 Acres Total Watershed ,4
Drainage Area #3 = 369 Acres Inside Tracts; 1,147 Acres Total Watershed 4:
100 -Year Floodplain = 560 Acres Inside Tracts
GRAND TOTAL = 1,253 Acres Inside Tracts
- -�V
i.
Stream Locations
Tract Boundary in Project Scope
Proposed Lot Layout - FUTURE
Wetland Delineation - FINAL Recorded JD
Previous Phases of Development
Floodplain Areas Beyond JD Scope
1,000 2,000 4,000 6,000 8,000 10,000 12,000 14,000
Fei
c" Continuation of Watershed Areas x
. Beyond Project Boundaries a's�Indicated,
sawCl.`wxY ' vJArr!P`3k.3Rt ..
(map scale 1" = 2,000')
~ .n_ Gum Branch Road
46
.•Yi �
• i
fi
!• �i_ a" 5
MAL.
Mt
2
tyF
NOTE: All boundaries and distances as shown are considered approximate.
A PLS survey of delineated areas and review and approval by the
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers is required prior to specific site planning.

f�
W
u7 r m r L J W IO W u1 w W M w M 'T 7 0. J N rV T M d Cn tT d d 11 V) CV ul W I J w t l d N w d fT w LL. W n N W J. M w n M M r, d ry U. u, r, V W u) 7 J I V I J I J ' t J I lL W M- w d d ❑v W n, {) d a, r] u W I I r M,
w m u] U7 w u) d N O M m m d tV w ul M w N u] M M w m N 0 T r w W w N d d w m w u) w w N W N d 0 O M N T O W w U7 O N O w O iD N w- O m M w w- O M n _ j d d O O, M n U) N M n M to N d G u> M N d rD Cn W N n LL M n U rn U d I, rJ, d I. JI a M N r N u' u) M n O 4, V1 U r M J r I r) - r u 'L S, M d U ,V W L ` r V h
N a7 P G d aI n d N r a, r n w n W d W r O d N 0) w d ul O w a1 O N a) d W d N O N w O o N O, d w N m to W u] 1/] d tow to W a) W O LD d M d N w d w U) N O W N N M M w a r M '' r ,� w N d m d M N n w 0 to n O M r N N N N N In N C d T D n w tV to u` In F r 7
O a, N M m O N N O U7 N M m h d O N M a) O d u) N U M r N M w r w w m M N r u] O N r U ` W V r( ^ J, w- - u7 G, N N w 7 G IT l J tU N r tT ) M w r N u) g d d h M r) m
M w W w d W w w t0 w w If) d w W w N u] d w d to M d In w d w W M w a) w M M d n r W w M a, N d M m w d M d d w fV d `i M M w M M M w u' n N M w N d d N N d d t J V M In Nl N N w M C N (n N N N m `r O C N N w d M M M N r r u7 _ '- d u) u7 O u7 N w N m N N N N 01 d M C) r M N In N M M d d O M W d (T N O (n r [() d d T
w N M V M M w d u1 M d N m U] W N M M M n CO M d lD r w 10 r M u) to w r M M R C .- O N N .-- N M M N M M d w d M M M N M M d r d w w 0, d (T w 6, w d tP N d d ,O M O C w r`, w h r d r d m 'D N w In d r r M NG] w d r O w W M d d N CD to W 0 ul O O n M w 0 W w M
w u) W d d M M � d M d ul d d d d to d d � M M '- w M N n M w `r d w N W u) M N rJ w w ", d S N d d M d r d w W tf1
LT AAH 'S fl
a
T W W W W W IIJ I,J 41 W tll '
W W 4j 3; W W W W W l,I W 4J w w w; 3 3 3; 3$ 3 3 3 3 3 W W W 3 W W 3 W W W W 3 U 3 03 3 3 3 IJ 'S U3] ran 3 M] N w f�l r w w [_ V [,. U W d w n W rl u , J lal S z{ IJl { IA 3 -� j 3 3; W W W W W W; W; ul w W W W w W W 3 3 3 W w to 1,1 1.1 W w W w III ; S �. z 3 3 W W LI 3 3 3; W 3 3 3 3 3 z 3 z W w [,I W W w; W to W 3 3{ 3{ LJ IA {{ lal ',1 W I,I W W $. IJ) W LLI W W W W W; W W W W; W w LJ W W W W w W W ut 3 3 W W W W W
J A 04 w - N d rn w w N r d m O r N N N h w N N N O m N d N M V M r [V O m (V h d , ,), I, U N N - u) N m M O O d � d N •- M d M N) W M M d O M M V N d M U] N � to d C N •_ •' d w O u) N M M M •- CV N N m 0 � O M O �, O � O M d d C d O M d M N u) W p u7 - t J V w h, � LL, V u_1 N N h U] �] d V] In Co W (V w J) F 1 W lD d d U d M lU u) W N rJ � N w n rT [V V, O, d [V W tL YI V, f M N) u r w r� l_ V F - V r r 'z) f V J. u] 3 W
Q U in w W u 1 w V o w w r u 1 M u7 J, d r) ul n' U u) V � S'
d N M O O G V7 O d _- M V M N) d d M M N] d- V L l M d V) d M N M O M if u) a, r n w w F , t r W
N M- uJ I J l V
N 1 G '- M d t`J 0) N N M (V d O M O N U u) Y) ul d � G W P P M � (J � - U) .- u, J[ t 1 - M N LL+ , II ._- LL - rn- N f- d r u, Io
Z OC - d r w n O d d M N In r 1n U7 w 0 ID ;- M O u) M r r m w In r (P M M ID O M rT ,w�, 0 w w rn 0) m O n w m O m n N 'w,, w a, d w a, N d M r rn to r [V d Y] rn u) N a, w N M w M M w (J tT u7 hl IP In h N d w (7) r M M n w w N O (V 1p ❑J UJ u7 u) u) O m w C) d m d d u w C) m P d w N a, w M d w W V N N W d M O g d u7 N tV V N U 'f M O d d W N V, m O M d N u) M- i+] W IN
� W M d '- U) N d M M u1 d N r- .- N r- M M U7 N O -- O m O M -- p M O M .- u) O d )� d V 0 u) � d d N .- M Ln M M M O d m J d d V I� U G V [V u] M ul -- N V, _ NI � LJ N1 IJ V ul U d N u) N •- u) .- N U7 M r O w M to � m w d u7 M V w � w M o h � d � W m W 7 T 117 W M ul u1 V CJ m d J O u7 -- r, N d d M N) M fV W N Y, N
N d w � r r O u l t ACA -- N N 'J M ) .- d N) - N V) d U u I`J 7 M d P u7 tV U � U I ,_) u) G m 0 I') U p d V1 U) M N U I N to O d d d M P ' In 7 0 M •- , 7 t J'- N t l p r �' O In w fT tr7V u7 d p d d d C_ fn T (T N m 0 w M d w a, ry p N -
r d N) w •- N n 0 0 M d N V) a) N N M N r r7 p r) r N 0 m O M 0 to d r w w M [v It, W lJ) tT w d U m V d w O N O C d u7 - u) r N u) - M M, I q M, J W M W r n m M- tow M
W Y w d M O d W u) m r w r u) w d M m n d N r w d M N d r- M M d N w u7 u) m r r In m u) M N O ID N d w O m n N U) In M w d IJ w M h W V) w r r M N to (V r, n W„ 4) .r .I7 `r) LL, N !w) P n N w m d tT M_ _ u
►- /) S N3H w - In m to n D a) p n d w N M _ tJ w w IL) d V u] D M w M CT G W W M U, [V t CJ
N M r o o M W n w tow r) ) w W d W n In W w w v u) rr N M p ]- rn w ul n n d rn rn d G w CO M M r n a, an d cn D) N n J) uL w IJ . 1 I., rJ d d ,, P ] , d v M u d� � M d N N t` a
3 IMQ NU 213Q W z z zzzlz nzzzzz n n v7 v7 n
N Z L Z L 7 Z N W N V) N N N N W I/) m Z Z Z Z L7 W N V) L Z L L L Z z Z Z Z Z 7 V1 Z Z L L7 L L L� _ L Z L V) L) Ur W V1 ul 1/1 C7 ul V) Z O 7- ) u) r , L N M d U) W h w M
V L' C Z Z u) W Z 7 L L L Z Z Z U) L Z C L L L Z Z I I Z t l I I u, ul t l l � 0 m u7 m D .} n '(' m d N � n w O O I� M r C` tD r d In N In � r r d U) N N r7 • -- r u r M ul N w U` w u) W h n� d r. d ,V �, � N r G O w w M 0.7 D V) lD u] m p p (T f d u) w h r m W � M M O d w r M 'O M n d
Z 7< '�] � L'r Z/ In L u7 L Z L u] � i 1 Il V� V) u] t l [) l7 IJ W U v d ' u) r W d c` O w Co n u) to O � (`J N M N tL tD n
(�% J Z 7 Z 7 7 7 Z Z Z Z C %, (!) , ll [!, L C ,? _ Z! Z 1 7 I, C Z ul Z L to to -' L V) L❑ L Vr rV IC 'i r m It) h P ul W d d N In tD R m N
Z 7 L Z Z I V' Z > L7
Z L7 to W to V L to V
U) 7 1, Vr 1 c [l VI 1 Ll VI In V) V) L', L 7
= ~Z f N N N N CV rl M M _ M M M M M M M M d d _ d d d d d d d d to m _ w O w _N iM D wd m w w UlU O r U-) r r f r w 1` h f W f r O m m _
'C
w a' O C M d N w N W T O N M V ID N m T 0 to i w 'J 1 J J I J 11 r 0 0 0 O O O O p O O P O O O G O U V U C U J �, O O w r
C � � _ C,
D J m C C O O O U O C O P 0 O ,
IJ tl `I NJ �J ^! '^ •
1--L o � 3 � 3�333l3`- 33333333'333333333==s 33333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333; � 33333333333333333333; 3333333 �3 � `-3 - - NN J + J !NI N,JN11 NNt�J
U Z 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3
a-r
«~.
N N w t w M m m w to ID 0) O w w M - r m w O M m 01 m M O W N m w W n N N M n N M w N J W M U7 r w 0 d Io d CJ '1 ul d M w wnw w U)- I I I r m h N r- w t0 to 0.l - u'. fJ rJ C m O W G In O r m - S Z
d r w r N d M w w IA O) rn M d h d a, M lV to N r w N w U a) O N w M O O d r d a) O d N u.7 w ul ul w N r "r M II , u' f u M m w N M N u7 r d W a, O d m W In W iy h M O m 0 rJ u") w (T J M r W w J 4. w tC m w M, Q) N C")
O m M a, d d d d M M r t J M w u) t J U1 u-) ID '- CP W V u l I f f') I r d i d N, [ v f LL Vi M r d W S r V r` ) d f J V Y U, "`1 0.J u to •1 - f J` ,- 'J, ! ") -,
O O D M M w M r d N M G M d M w o M W m M r w Io N N O O N N d 0117 w w In W w d d r N w d ID u") w ( W (T IJ1 n r 0 w N O N N w 19 ,T d w 0 a, M
n r w w d d M M w u) M w d N M m to w N w d ul M t/7 w M N N d d d M w N d I'r) I") d r w w N d N N N w M M M M d m d N M w N N u7 M M N r'7 M w d d (V M M d V7 w N d I l - +) I`J M M d M r d w w r Vr w M d N N M d In M f- M M M d
Z
M d M w M d d l W d d r1 M d n W in n w m d d a, w M iD to n w d w w O I_
< O V
www 3 3 w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w 3 3; 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 w w W w w w w W w W W W W WI w 3 Www w w w 3 3; 3 3 w wwww Ll11) w w w w II C z 3 3 3 3 W W t 3 3 3 3; 3 ; 3 3 3 3; 3 3 w 3 's ; 3 3 3 3 ;; 3 3 w 3 w w W w w w; ''") Q 11 Z
M M N N w CID N M tV u) d m U U) U r M d h W r w m I� O w M a p �D O d• l0 1� r M lD M �0 N rn w M N U m w u) d U) p, r) u] I+) d I r N) 1 10 ID Q O U (p M u7 w rn d w O �- W W t J M U., U ID h a, w a) d m _ � W; 3 W 3 W W; s ; 3 3 3; W
p o W N d w M d U7 O 117 d 4 =- B O O N V7 M d m o tJ7 d u) W m M M n w o n r- rn G n u) w 'D O P a, N w N r 0 If', O u M 01 a) w n w N m M n d) O co w W u In m O M M M r u- r n W w w I.iJ
O d O d G O O N to w M N N d N N N N _ _ _ _ _ r tL (P V u N LL, r M m a) f . n
I'll M 3
lL J LL> ,
W w LL M r w W i IL N u r) n (ti r r W Z W t 1
w w d w r ■ ■■
OD w P d N N n Y)
d O N M O N d M V) (V M M M U u) M O v N d V C. N U d I+) M u) M d M O M V) N N d IV O d I'1 N O O N P d W U d u7 d d w d d N w V m O M d N V, D7 w U N W w I`) w m u) O M v r- C N rn w N w W w rn d d M w W w d w w N
d I') V) m N O O w r N lD d w d M (T, r d (T w d r d r u) O w M w d m N r M 0 M a) w u7 [D (T (D w M N d tP 0.J d M d u) W d W O W O Cn a) to d w V D N M w _ �a _ N d N w M o M In N d- M M N - -�� w r ,p m r tD n n w G w r r tv w O O w � d w d M
M - _ M u) c o r d u] M (T w V) U f •J - w u) (T (T N w w m N d w C) u7 w M d r d w d M n d w u) w G w !r M to d h O
w u) N O d M d d N d M M m N ,o O N N M O M M W W Io N d d d M O lV d Ln O d M w O w w O w d V u) u) M) d O 0 11 (� N d O N N O CO w fJ !T u) m n V w M a) w p d w N R n Y] rn w
O d u) N N O O W w N M N d � N u7 u7 p N d W M � W -- O O O d d d N d u7 . M M d u, u _ _ w d rn w n d
a, M r M O r Io m M1 d o lr O N fn W W w N tJ) h N n w d w IT (V r w w h fJ w w CO a) V U7 - fl N d M d N d ) d d N u) u) N )_ 'V •i d N r1 O M d M M p M N I.-, ,.) 0) to Q
N w M tU _ m - m J) In N O w (T r r f- m O w . L I r , M u)
d C] d. p r N M 1O M M W M O M M N W n w w r u) N M w w m V) w r w d d M M M O M `r d m W w d r r w to w Z w n d N O 2 M to M N O N n r N r ul u) d In r ❑, d lJ M I w M r w In tD N N r w w m r w w r, h w u, d R M f� W V) V7 d w rn w N \� Q L&J
W m Io w W In Z Z Z Z w Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z W W Z V) !n N W !n W m m in In /n w W W !n Z Z m Z Z Z V) Z Z Z V) z Z Z Z 2 Z Z Z W V7 U) V) (f) In W Z W Z Z Z Z Z L 7 U� V, [,7 N (/) V'1 to V) to u) Z Z Z N !n Z Z V7 V) u7 [,) Z V) I, u7 L u) u7 [,^, L V, Z Z l) u) Vr t. I) L L L In In U V, n d r p r] tV U z z z d r LV \ W Y
� � V) to U N V) L7 V) Z Z Z Z N to V] �i
;wwww w w w w w w w W w w W w w w 3 w w w w I,) w 3 w 3 W w W W W a-
n woNwd d I.- vnrNd d Nw NMNwou O Jd h No)v, - ur M Z
(V w J d' -J ul In fJ M N _ N N t M rNj V,j V) Fv M d Z
N f d d M O Q
M d N w N m M O N M d In w n w W O N M d U7 w N m rn 0 N M d u) w N m a, 0 N M d W w r ro V) O N M d lCl w n w rn 0 N M d Lo S, r m rn 0 N M d W u, N m Ln P N r, d u) ,C1 f` CO 0) U N M ^` \ v) u) W d r, d N 0 w d M N w W N C W M W w 10 d I 1 [T C IV w P- u7 O w I ry (D w w d a
d u7 M M
m �- N M In N Y N N O d U7 M
d wrm U) O R w W S O � N ) n r l .- N u] M N O
d u) tD w U L N N) If'
_ _ __ d I w n w rn C' � N N d 1
h M lI Io wnw V) O N O u C
m U w w IT "7 M d N d d M
M N d d U U] )n u7 1f] 1 w w w w r r n r l n r n h Rl (D iT 7[ h
N N ) d d dddd u7 u7 )In w ww n w m wwmm W W D)a,rnrna�rnlr ,) ) lr,_ N
w w w m w N w w w w w w m w m m w w w w m W w w w m w W w w W m w m w w w w w m m w W w m m w W w w m w w w W CO 0.7 W w W w w w w w (D W w w w w W w UJ V) ) Cn U J ,T U) V a, U) (T a V) V) (T a, f N a I J "1 I ! r J L J ' I J N )" - u7 to u7 U) U u) u i U t11 w LL7 W w tU w S O M M '>- 0., N, U) n to u% w w w V d d w p u) r V) M U d M r U) u) u) W M lD
��oo ��oo ggoo 5m0 ��++ 0' U1 QI U+ tT ,], J J V VI J J LT J, tT O VI a, S. J V) m G O U Of VI C) tT CP O C) O) \ r! w M M r m to r !
3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 ) 3 3 tt,� $ \ vpi (n v7 vi ° V, z w z z z z 00 z z Z z z z z z z V, (n z z z 7 z o n In �)rJ r w o
\ L Z Z� Z Z Z Z Z L Z Z Z Z Z O
1
w n a N
M w V7 M1 N W n O w O h d IV C 'D N r 0 W M m m lT N w 0 O N d r d N w u7 W r w h w W M N m 0) N w w w O w O M r') m www O tT w d m w N N m N u7 O tV N w M r a W d �, O A t0 W u) O 3 w w M u) O In O n CT O M r M w w W a, W w w d O d ID W o W S M V d M IT [It] m h n r Q) W Lo w N U7 rn C] IJ0 ul h w w w d In d tD w M N m w N M d W w
2 'D M M
W U N [P N O .- N w u) u) O tD u) V7 IT w n - r M w tD w to w w r w CO w w r w O) w d to C, N O II') T O O m N 0- O w d W N r- w w U M 0 w w In O d d r r O O d .- M CV n n L] O - W- N w N r a, W I r) V, .n .a r u) VJ rn d r NMd rn N m w r d h h w d to u' %J M d r) U, w T (P C J �. In N C) CT i t) C` u, n w r M M W d N (T O) M M d O a) to U) a` (T tT (l) U' V) V) tT tT (P lT U, (T (T m C, 01 a, O tJ CI, C a) a` a) lT U U cV U O O O G G O C
ww tnN dNOlnmwu7 d MMtDO, dwnlnd wrr rnN(nOtnn dwNru7ootDU)NaornwoGNNOD• -rntDr or[n1�i�ooMlnr� d� mrndM r n o1n Nr cJrJ,ln r rJ pNN� u7 W In�NOp. -rnM.- rn d _ tDtD rnNr Ur wU waJwd n M� ow W rnrnw d N� m)nu7lnwmMw 333 3333333333333333333333; 3 3 3 3 33; 333333333
O T N M d w
V N w w 1- U) r d u) r w to d M 'V N w� m d w w ") d M d d w d In N n In d m .- r w^ M M w w M N � M N M d (T M d •- M d (V M N d (V m d d d N d � w a) w N � N w � d w M d d M N d N N "') N) d r w M M � to M n a, u7 d W W� t V w N M d d N m m w In w V d C w d in N [„ r` N ul N) `i u7 .- M w d w m d w U) V, rJ w M u] V N w M r d w d M
IJ ; w ;; w w w w W w w w w w w w w to w w w W to w w L,jL,J w w; w w 3 w 3 LD w w w w w w w 3 w w w w w w w w w w w w w w 3 3 3 3 3 3 w; w; 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 ;; 3; ; 3 3 3 3 3;; 3 3 w 3 3 ;; 3 w w w w w 3 I,1 w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w W W w `s w w w w w t,, s 3 3 w w w W; l,l 3 3 3 w w w w w w w w 3 w W I,J w \
lV (O d r M N M M m W M d d (P O u) w M p d d w N d M_ 0 0 IV O V) M d U N d M w w w r U V7 N O to tV I d` lD p) m to w w r M N N (T F7 ,a 0 (P r .- w a) r- M d m` In w w N N m n M M M M m d 'o- w N In N In O u) L M N) u7 u) to O to d u) w d d iD M d u7 w w tV u7 d- N O U d N) r Jr tV - w Cr1 N,
[(DD pppp O d C d N 0- N d M M d M N d 0 W tV u] M M p M N M d d d N N u7 W N N. M d M N
W d C N CJ 0 to M u) M W to N .- O M M N d ar N O I"7 d M d N 0 m O M N m M N W O m u7 N N d In O O N d d W P D N N M O - - - In r W N N O N M O u) N n w N N w N N
N d d d m N O O O M N to N Jn V V] O N- u) V w u7 M d M O R - C d U) N d d w M In d rV (n N N d M
w ul rn 0 � 0 .- w 117 U N w d W U S M w p W w r h w N w h d w d r� N r N O d n w M d U') m (V W r lT w d N N N ip n d M N 0 0 0 N M M O d r 0 w r U') m u7 lA w N h w w N � U 7 O r U r r M h
U CJ N N d M d d d M M M to d w O d N M O N to 0 0 0 - M M M w d t N M M 0 10 d O d M O O N u) u) O N a N 0 M SV N N N w M w d u) d m M O O N d N M N M Ln M o d O M M O M w d M) O w s d M d w a, LT d m r a) d N r p to p M M w d d u) d N N w N n w (P
m OI d m U O) r M M 0 N d r M N d � -co W M to _
C7 d w w w M � w r O O d d w N M u7 N d � N u7 N d N d In .-. O .- � M N O O d .- N � M - A \
N m N) w w M r C, d r to d CD w rn tD m W w M M^ d d d p d N w N d IT r w 01 N 0 d d w a, w w w m a, M W O N O d O r W `w u7 M r w d n r V7 N d N u) N w O) U W m r N N O w O d T U m IV W d N n N w r J N m d N rn u) d N d N W m w N w m M w n w O M u M ,� M M d n W d M u7 M N M V M p Y) O )n M to M
M G tV N O w w m w w w w O M u) d m O r d W o n w w O w u) O N d m m w M w ry w w r M1 0 u) M r r u) W m M M M r r d O N M N w M w N to W O m w W W r m N w d r U) M n w r N d m r N O N d (n 4 - N w r w r w w r r d w u) r w r _ \
w u] w w M w w m u] r N n M N d h N m d W d r w I-�- N d Q O CO N w m II') O IV O W N^ v �-�-- \ ,[1
V) V7 In (o W V) V) !n z Z Z N V) Z 2 Z In Z Z Z Z Z N Z V7 (n In Z Z u] Z Z Z Z Z Z W W 2 Z Z Z Z L Z !n to Z Z L Z Z Z V7 Z W N W {!) Z W V) N Z Z W W Z to to W N !n Z W V) W Z In (() W Z W W L V) V) Z to W Z N N t! N U) Z V7 U) (1) Ul Ul U) V) U) W In IJ7 V7 If) Z z Z z V) Z Z Z Z L Z V, U] Z V) (,) Z_ V) L L_ VJ V7 V) Z UJ N L7 V) �, V7 u7 V1 U, W (o Z L L L L) V) V) In V) N In
IV r) d W w n m W 0 N M d to w r w a) O N M d N w n w rn 0 N M d w w r m C) O N M d w w r m a) O N M d If) lD r W CJ) O N N n d u] w n W (T O �, N r'7 d 117 w r OD C) O N N) d In lD r OD Ct O u_, N M d U) tD n m C) O N M d U) w h [Yl C) O N rl d In w n w C) O N I") d In t0 n W V, O N M d u] t0 n 0.7 a, O N M d In w r m C) O N M d W (O r llp C) O N
IC LL w IC w r n 1` r r 1` h r h r m m m m m w m m m w tP rn 07 CT a) l7) O) 01 DI D) P O O r r r U� O U r r h h r r r r r r r r h r^ cli IN "A n r N N n n L� n n n h n n M rn r r r r N r N r n r In (� r r n h In Ln In in r r n N tLo� �' rJ V Lo L o 4 w 1 h r r r r- n f` n n m w m ro w 170 w m m W C )' 01 T M 01 O 0 O a C) (1 V C) C' L O n 0 O
I u)�wwwww ww www ww 3w www ww � w w wr t 3 3 3 rnrnrnrrrrrr rnnnr rrrrnnrrrnrrhrnr n nnnmmw mmWwwmaDwliomwaDaDaoaommwm e \ ��'V �/
3 3 3 3 3 3; 3� 3� 3 3 3� 3 3� �� 3� 3�� 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3� 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3; 3 3 3 3 3; 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 ; 3 3 3 3; 3 3 ; 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3
t J u) Cn M N tow t r N M w w r] r w d w N O m N a7 M N a7 w w w w d w m m d N O r W N d N r w w N d m O u7 O N O m O d N Cn u7 U7 N m m w d N W N N r h to N w m N T o n w O h N w In v1 m w w [D Cn O N d O w p 0 w V u) W n W O M O w m w w to
O w In W N W 0, O m N O r w w w d w M W M W `3 M .- d m w M tT N M W d - 0 0 0 w r') � N ^- w U) m M r w w w w U O D m r w m � w d a1 w -- -- w N w n N r D w In If) w n r N _- w N O w m h (T W u, w w G r - n O V U -- '- N M w to w o O CO w m U) CT (T u) d W
V, I J U m d N W O N m r• rn 0 U1 m u) N M U M a) w w w w d N W w n M w M O, n h M m N In r n d M m d m W N d O) N d M In w N w M w N M W a) a1 O) O n m M r Io 0) -- M M w w O r a1 a1 n^ P r M m w (T N W a) r N w U w I`1 d M w u) h N W M m N N d r N d w U` (T N) 17 r h W m w N w G V) w r W d / m h w
u 1 V n ] V, N u] w d lD w N d d d '7 M w r w ul d h u) n m r r d d w d u7 M^ w CV O, d d M 00 r to N M d- VI m d d M u] N w M N N I17 01 d N N 1!') d w In d d d I") M d n d M w In to w h d M m w u] ) w r` n n n rn LLJ r V7 r r- �! r In t0 w w d M f- 0 rWj to m w w M Imr,J O I t` 7 rrj N O d tJ r)J, f\ O) 01 CNj W 1 4 (P U` D l W ID w w r w ro O
41 w w w w w 3; 3 w w w 3 3 3 3 3 r,j w w w 3 3 3 3 3 3 w w w 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 w w 3 3 3 3; 3 w 3 3 w 3 3 3 3 3 3 w W w w 3 3 w 3 3 w w w W w W w W w W W LO W w w w W 3 W 3 3 W w W 3 3 3 3 3; 3; 3 3 w 3 3 z; 3 3 ;; 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 w w w W Li3 Low 3 3; 3; 3 3 3 w w w w 3; 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 w w W w �(� VO /
w V u, () tU M V) w w a) h w w M V - r) w r) r w r M V) d r U (P M r M tV n w O V h rn m 0 e'1 U G h O r N(D m V) m M M N r M m O r d M (\j N M d r N d u) m w w w u) If) to w m a1 m U w n d w n d O N m M r h d CJ M a) w ul N _ _ r�
d m U V, d N d N M- W _.-- )`) N M V N W d M O M p d U O N rV d w u7 u) N M u) O d w d V U'1 d u) O O d to N O M M M O M w r N m m O d 0 M d w N d u7 r `0(, w V u] d r m N d w w r M N M w w w r In N r- M m 2 N / `
uJ M ry N1 ,) M N M u) u] U N U V - 11") N N d tV M M N) d u) _ O O In N N M u) In u) U) I d U) O C N o M N d M M N d 0 w M , O d O u) p -- C O d
IT, U D .D w- tV u7 n W (T w r 0 w M r d N w a) m M d O O r r N w M to w M 01 N W m C) O N h N w a) IV O N w 0, p 0 (D w r M a, O r r r w r m m M r O w N u) d M M m V) p O d d In 0 w N IT N N w N W N N M U N r h O d U) u] M O N m 0 cV N M LI'j �
w u7 O d 0 u7 to o N N o m N N m 0 4 W m d rn u O w d n M \\ �%
M O M [V O O LV N M to N N M u] d 0 N u) M d If) U7 d O O d M M u7 d 0 w M In M LJ) to O d M N M m d 0 M d `r `d M O �- M N U N In P Y) M M m u) u) d m d P W O N d d N d to m o N W m r M (T d N (T `1' m
)`J M G N O O M M d w M N M M W N M Ip M O U") d O d M U7 d M 11'I N d M ry O N d M M N N N d N Ill d O M N M O N
tD [D w C) O n In N in n 'D O, Qi M O d O a h v r O id'1 M d d O ON d U") N Q) CO W a N M [D O O O N N d N O 1wV O O tp dN W W W W �D N N m D n I` D) W d In N v w M [n M w d w M to d 00 d w In GD r Y7 r; O tp u7 Ot N r d 00 W M CO f d d Q) O O N v p W r N N] G d r d d u7 N m N u7 ID N t'P Vl
M w N M W N w n N d d N d w m d m d d r Nl o w r d N N M to (V u) w w w d M w w n h d W O O M O ` /
to d N to M r w 0 0 m N O d d w w N O N N uJ m r w w m r N 0 0 M
ur V) N w w m In V7 W 7 V, W V) U In W Z V, V7 to U) W Ul W V) V) W N (/) m m m N N m N N V] N W N V) U) U] W In Z Z Z Z Z Z W W Z Z Z Z Z Z Z !n N W 'n m N N N !n N N N N m N Z Z Z Z Z Z Z 2 Z Z Z L Z m N N V7 U) Z Z W In N 1f) V7 N W V] In N Z Z L Z Z L Z L 2 Z N Z Z Z Z fn W W (n In N N V) u1 47 V) Ul to Vl V) V7 N Vl In Q Z Z Z Z Z U) U, fn ul U) U7 w (/) W
LO LLJ
\' �m0
f W J) C3 N M d U) w r w a, 0 lV M d u] w N w Cn O n N M d W w r w a) U N M d u) w r w O O N M d V7 w h W a) O N M d m w N m m 0 1� N M d In w r m O O N M d u) w n m rn O N M 7 W w N w tT O N M d W w f`- W rn O N M d In w n m fT U N M d u7 w n w V, O N N) d u] r n pp (T O N M d u) w n w U) O N M d In w r [O (7) O
r) fr - rJ (V N (l N CJ N (`J CA N M M M M M M M M M d d' d V d d d d d d U' W u) ul to U7 W W N W w D w w w w w w w w r to r h n r r n n N W 'L) w w m m w W m w a) O a1 01 IT IT IT o (T O o 0 0 0 0 0 0 G 0 N (V N N N N N N N N M I") M M M M ) M M M d d d d d d d d d d u] u) N W m N N W w u1 w w
u r LL I u7 u l LL) Ifl u] u] Ifl ] In [� U7 U7 �) In u) In (f) U] In U7 w In N N U I U7 u7 W In u7 In In 3 u7 m In m In m N N u> 3 U7 In V7 u] u) In W m u'1 m W Ili m to Ifl m N N 3 m N N In In If] In W In N N w m ICJ W m m N m W W W l0 N m w N [n w w w w w w w w w w 3 w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w wwww lD w w w w w w w w w tD wwww w w w w /
3`
w
w T w LL) m o M w w w Cn w / / \
'j, , I V G d n IV w P N h Cr w O w In M M m m a) N d r W - M N N O) m U) G O In N N O C1 (J O a N to d d O u) N 01 U r to n to w N u) M r M N N M N N w W In r
N
M d rl u7 W W O
u V w W r d M d w N M d N d d uN d O M In N V1 W N m V1 w W V a) w d J w W a) W O w M n N m N N w LV (T a) N lT a) d uN ] N O d M M r d W r0 V 4 0, M rr- J M w a) w (7) O
. cI,J1,11.133tJJI,J3w LIJ www w3 w333w; 333333333333ww33ww33w
I w tP W rn- O, N W d OD u7 r co (D `I'7 O u) m m t/') N w w d a) w - M r �t w rn u7 rn W lD d M JD w d N In p w (D Lo M If] n in d m I w N t A N � A}
g d w U) W N O M in N M M M M u-1 d w O O N O N) M M N IV d p d d d o N (n W N N W to N W O N O O W M W O N d 0 N N O N W d In O W V7 0 0 d O N d
I J r> v w If- r V (� W O n M n C N a, d O N d 1p O O tT u) T W 0, w N M P a7 w d r M O w w r d m w r M n O w W W
p M d d N In M u) - N M- M N p d d u7 d N If) N M N d O M M M In N d M d N m w O d W N O M N 'f) � N d In u) . O d In In M N O O M O N 117 M � In M I0 J^ N 0 \
Cn m M U w d (V U CT r N N 0) O w d 0 to d O N w M In w w O M d w w 0^ d W ID C, w M1 a) M N IT (D d d w O d M 0 M M O N N w CV O N (n w w d (V r O M 0
r J- U tv M O _ N d M w G N d G N O W w J') N w W N N O N M N M N W N M N M m M N d to W If) O w r to d co f)
Z Z Z 7 =) Z Z f) V) In Ln M to N Z Z 7 Z Z 7 I W In !n !n !n V1 to N !n In (n N (n W W W W N V) In Z Z Z N (n N N N V) In (o U7 (o !n L7 W W 2 Z_ Z Z 7 Z Z Z In z (n Lo N N N \w Q. z
O
I w rn O N M d W w r m a, U- N M d m w r m T O N M d to wrm T O N M d W wrm T O N M d m w r W D1 O N M d W w h m a) o N M d m w r W 0) O N M d w w Z O 'd ,<O� Q��!
1 I J I! r l M r) M M M N, M M M-4 d d d d d d d d d m In In u) 117 w In m m Vi w w w w w w w w w w r n r r r r r r r n w w w w w w m w w w p a) a, lT ar a1 a) (T W a, 0 0 0 CJ 0 0 0 Q. m Z > (10 Q
d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d "r d d d d d d d d d d d d d V d d d d N u) Io to W W to ✓ /
Z O � W W oJ
0 ^ a. D v L269 268 <� L256 L265 J�6 GA VO
W fi rn W N M d d w U) m M N w d U] w d M to d N W d N r w d w m d m u) 'n d u) C, to V1 u7 w N O M M N V7 M N m m N M m O w w M w M W r d M V) O d r w n N M N U = e'� L7'1
U, d d 1 r r ur r` tn- to In t r• Mo a, Now• wwNwCV W If In `0 WNwwlnminMNMlnoalNM�wlnh a,dn u, WGdwMmin�w dw
V LL, M tJ) tU M V, d V) J) [P W- d w M to In w •- O r m V) W m rn N N O C) N d r- In M O N M w ) to o u7 m Lo d M d r N o u) o d r w o CID n M o r m O w w m N w to N d 00 "�
d M w w W n M w to 117 N d w M w N M w d M M M w W W 1
r J d d u) N M ul d V) °' �� w In d to w d N w d w w W �2�ry 6� r��
E
LI ws 3 w w W w w g W w w W w 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 w 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 m n E
J u U W r r u) V I M d r w (n d to p M N w N d r w O w M M w O N to N M w O - `d ° w d r M r d u) d ID a) d N N N N N O O O a1 d N w N n M d N u7 CA m w W r I N - E
+ N d d N r) P d d N M d d M W O M O N M m N to d O O d d 0 N N d O O d .- N O M d W V7 O M N N u) N O N )17 O N d 0 w w N J W453 E E E E
d r m O W O d m M d w n r^ N a) a1 M d d r M to w 117 r d O N N M r w m m w w m M m w w II') O w r D) d w w O d M N to N IT u7 M U7 p r) u7 O M w In m 1
O U d IN O •- d M 0 0 M U7 M N d M d W Ln d' M m V7 N u) M M .- N N N N M N M M d M N W d N O O IE E
0 0 0 !T V If, O 0) M d to M T W N w OD w u7 w N w O O w r u7 (n N n N m m d N M O N D) w w O ID d- r - m W if] m N O V) 4 w d E 1 E -
- N r m N M I_) If) M d N N M M M ") m M M w I w r d In r to n w w w N O r w w d r w r w n w w w r It w N d M m d M d w w d 11") N 'd M w I m d M w w N M d n c
1 �J .• [,) w L Z Z 7 Z Z 7 L In to (o N to N VI m W N to Z N Z Z Z Z Z Z N ZL In W W m m Z N W Z W Z N In Z Z Z Z N N N W N N N V) N N N m m N N V7 In ro to (n (n U) In to to fo ks W450 E� E
+ oo E d c N
3 r N E E d n A c W4 Q LO
8
W,
LL-
O
w
LLJ
I
V)
r3
E O
W N
G4 II
Z
U
v C'r
H
z m
(Z
Q
U
Z
Q-
o0
00
11
.d. a
Q -
C
-
F-
MLO
W L l M
^^V
I I I I I
CYO G
w
(^t
LL
Ln `t 't r L
O
U
UN -
Z
v) ;)
Q Z L
J
I I I I I
\i f C O (Y_) 01
F-
ILL)
3
U
C)
o
O5
w
W
z
��
V/
< Q
Om
U, t,) I!) U)
fr c'
V)
m
Y Z
U
W CY
;wto
a
ul
a
wa
w
7
U
V)
a "V
p
0
N
0
Ix
4
.LZa
WrIC
U
0
oN
!
T
zoo
I U
M n
V
J
w
O °I)
$.
Li U ILL
\ \\
c`J
O 0
I-
N 0
z
Z m
L
:E p
LLJ
V)
_j
) Z
o
U
Q
z
J
a
t M
�
T
1
0 �
LI 7 ll R
0
I�
J CI V (D
LY
LL
r5 :'7
8
W,
LL-
O
w
LLJ
I
V)
r3
E O
W N
G4 II
Z
U
v C'r
H
z m
(Z
11
Q -
-
Z
Q�EL
I I I I I
CYO G
Ln `t 't r L
n
v) ;)
Q Z L
I I I I I
\i f C O (Y_) 01
F-
C)
,�
(1 I(J
Q lyl Z
0
�.
L11 t J LLJ LJJ LJJ
Q
U
U, t,) I!) U)
fr c'
LIJ LJ I W l IJ I
W CY
;wto
ZON
Y ID
\
U
V)
Z m
0O
N
F X Z W
.LZa
WrIC
!
T
zoo
I U
D
e
Z (n 'f
n
r�)
? zm
Li U ILL
\ \\
c`J
O 0
I-
I
>
L
Y
v7
1
C-' U I
t M
LCJ
LI 7 ll R
\
I�
J CI V (D
LY
LL
r5 :'7
Z C]
?
\\
T r
��
C.
Jr LJ1 LY EL
Z
(P
y/
/ 11,
11 I1f 1111111(.
ry E Ny'r w4sJ �E ; �'3 c y�°` N 44
w E Sg r w66B / \ \ a
I" u' UN, M ij� vl �i n' Mi trVi Yw) "w) Ywi n n n n I+wi n O i n n Iri n n Nri n ro aNMD AMMO adr,o awMO orN,D oWMO ro m NOi n n rOi r'�7 i'07 M n O O a d a a O a a O a d c v d a a a O v a v d -1 folo v a 'o`J' E / W45�W4$B W4 9 �p ` 3 °ry° �{���° ?W� o ZO n- Q 1^ CA 1)
I 3 3 3 ; 3 3 3 3 '`J- 3 3; 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 N N ( 41 r o 'vp N F U' It
E N a 'l W435 r. o �p c 3� d •399 \
E E a v° a W392 y W Z m m
It, U, ao N h d M r m r r r w 00 a w a, aM, M N N h n o d m In N w w W r to co m m N d �, M o In In In O M M d a1 N N N M a1 w m n w N m N O w M o m d m m O w E Fr, d 96N E0 ° a`c) 0 --� o o W39B 32'x/ W \
u .I, f f N- U G N w m O, [V w r N 01 O M O d m u) O d 0 0 U7 M M O W N d d w N h w d O O IN M m tT w N d N w w u) (V N O M 14 m r o w N M M h N j a N 3' Z V 4 a) 4 d r 8'
-1 f) Ul V W V a) a W w OM crn w D OdD m N (wn N N M to o) w w W m° I°n) ttoo r uu ao N III (MD to N (OD Iwo to ado Lo a W W N° v w O V W w IdD w V W d oNO m a (r° d V ldD twD r N W IN Nni W V E N , E o f a 'i € 3 .5 o k' ys3 J9 a Y
W E d W L a o �A \ a,
_ _ _ W N m W�s4J� �� Nc p v \ Om
_ u
It to W[A W w w w 3 3 3 3 3 3 3: 3: to to 3 w 3 w; w w w w W w w L,j w 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3; 3 3 3 R. 3 3 3 w 3' 3 3 3 w w w w w to w w w w w w w w w w W w Q o E m y, °J � rJn 3 ° d° ~�
1 V J to n Iu l N IA u, w M r) w w N tT r p a, M a w W m m m w m O p` O) N m w N N` , io In M `O D O O N r M M n O w N iD N m a1 O W o In W O O D) 0) w In M N E E �' c ° 3
I I (1 a N d M- N d M O M d u7 P d G G N O W N d M M d 0 0 W d d d d u7 O O d u) u) N M M M p M M d M u) d G D G O M N Io N N ul d O N d d m M 0 m S
d d O) r r In u) O N M w d m M tT u7 N N m W N w n o M ap M N u7 !T N M N N m O m M 0, O) M W d d N r M d W w w (n w rn (T M m U Q E gj c b o / Z
r l Ivl , I In M^ M M N d d o d o In LO N O N p In N d to - W In - m In O d N O In d- p IN IN .- N d U) In N N d M N to N O M d O M N u7 `� +� c c 3'} (� s �' / Z
to d( J u 0 N in d O N O O M
I in , J h r r, - u) J O, N O M r w c7 0 r m O o O N m r IT w CA d U) N r m o M N N r N m m rn N w o N m w M m U M r a, CV M r M r w d r d 0) O N r O) d m w W
.y w II ] W u) m t J M r to tV O M O d `, N O Lot N M m w w w W w m N to m d to d w n m r M w m r d Y7 d w w M M O N d w d d d m m r N w u) u7 d N m II') w w w Q
V I 7 (I Z 1 1 ul In VI Vl (o N N In In W to V7 VI (/1 Z fn to V) N Z Z Z Z N N to W (/) Z Z Z Z W W o W o Lo N N Lo (n W Z v) (o W III fn N W z !n (o In Z W z Z to z N W (o N (o N W N Z Z
z F d ^ 3°�'
F 3 3
_ _ /r
w w n W a1 O N M d w w n m m O N M d V7 N w m O N M d W w r m W O M d u7 w r OD O) O N M d W w N W M O N M d u) w N m m C^ N M d o w r E C N rn
r ( r f r r t` r f I` o UL) w IO w't LL) m w w w a) a1 a, a, III M M M a, I O O O O O O U 0 0 N N CJ N N N N N N CV M M M M rn M M M M M d d d d d d d d E n h
N (Al N N N N (V N N N tV N N N N (V N N N N N N N M M M M M M M M M M M 3 M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M
r l l) 1 I J J _J J J J J J _J J J J J 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 ; 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 R. 3 3 3 ; r EIn J
E v J
Jyq J y ° -t 1crJr`11412 ! \
N
.0 IP W r) r N w O O w m r O (o W O w It O) d M w O O to 'D rm r n in d O .4 U m- D) d O m r LD n In tV M w o O M O M W O m N N O N d m ul N O N N W E F� F d E E li v_ ot [SJ 'D M m ry d w M C N in n V O M a1 N d w w a, w 0 V7 d 0 0 O w 0 0 n 0 o N w d W M OD w w a) d N p N w d N p N N m E r; E'SF 3 r a
I I I r d N V N r 1 N d w a) o ^ N N to O N W r cn 1r N N m w N N N d cD u) w w M d LD •- tD r d r w u] d U7 d a) M M N M M m w a1 N N
E rnYry `E
d [ tJ E M O W a) r n d w at w N w M S- r G m rh U, mm u] M u) G d u) w 0, IV O w^ d w u, r- r r w u7 d N r w O N a) O d w N M w d N d N d w a1 w w 0) w O M T W IV u) d CV w n w u7 N IV Q \
3 Iu E S\ (�y N w M M r m w W d 0 0 d U' CJ d' d W a) m M O N d (V W N d IJ u7 N w a N_ N o M p If d m M M n m r d N U7 (J) d w r w w w t7, w d r w M to d C N w d w G h r tV u) _ G d d d U
O r7 A° �.J,E E N m W w to d N N w d o r N CA M a N 0 0 u) d .- M O m N O N u) N d r w l7, u7 N o w w '� d 0 M O w 0 ", N N n N n-4 d to w In w N N M d m w 0) w M w d M N O U m w d O w O w d N d a, a' to
In W 1.1 lJ Co W W W W W W W; W W; W W 3 W W 3 3 3 3 3 W 3 W W W W W W W W LJJ 3 W 3 W 3 3 W W 3 3 w ; 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 W W W W W W W W W W W r' E -!! ' ,tN j E: L Z w N M N Ip to w M w M N d U7 u7 M N w N M to u) N d N to M M M I`) d N d M N d M In d w d to N M M M to d M N M In ^ d in '� w M r N M d In d d N N CA -1 E
1 u, u, w M J, d fT M V r a) U) w m m d N N N N m d 0, w w O W w tT r d N 0 0) N w In N M d w w m W IN N d 0 0 0 to m IN a) .- r 0 w M ;; n\ O Z a
ul r) d N O In Io N N r) W d d M N w d d M W N In 11") O •- M N d N N In d O N 0 w M .- M N N M M M m N O N N O p N O \
U rJ - U I) w M d V r M N N m IN (T M w- M N N M n d 7 d IN r m r d N U7 d M w W d d N O, '� d M W O m w r N h w (n 0) N m U M 0 [ E rJ 3� E Q o f
I J d N u, V O M O O U W G V LD d ry f') M M N M d M N to N If, W Lo '" O d In d W M u] d MOO N 4 0 fV M In d to W p p N d d M N o W d N O N `i U) d N E
r ul f [J r r) M V M rV N) N M V in V, h O m In N d a, N M m m m N d In N N a) N d m O M N m to O N M a) N In N w N M w r O M LD M M w N w u r` d w IJ J E W rJ, W W W W W 3 3 3 3 3 3 W W W W W ;; 3 ?+ 3 3 '� 3; 3: W W; 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3; 3 ; ;; 3 3 W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W Z
u, u, u) M Y) M M M
I. M M O N d O N O w r w w r w m M N M m w w n d w N u) N w w N m Lot In N N w w M w W N d n r w N to N 0 0 N N (V r w ID Q' _ W W W W W W W W W W W; W W W 3 W w 3 W W w
4 _ _ d O N d m d- M .^- 0 0 u) N u7 O O C N) d d N w w In QI m O w w M r m m m m V M w d M n fV F O
(o to Z V) W W V) !n to Z Z Z (/) m VJ to W l/7 w In N N d O IN O d O N d M M d u7 N N O Lo O M d d d N N In d w M M p M u) o M d 4 U M u7 N M u) N M d tr d d M N M N M Z
(n Z In W z Z o m m Z Z Z z w Z Z o w Z z o z N V d U7 m m N M M O N 01 w d IN _ m
_ I I Z Z Z Z! 7 7 Z I Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z N N N to N Z 0' O Z w
Q' w w 0 n N p d (-,, n n ,D O O a) w N n u) w O M r O d m M m d M N0.! w r M
LY W ` d d M U7 M w d w N M- n w a, W to N N to N 1- M (D n n n a, g N 4 d N r ID N O w M w N a, In M tD ID d u) O to N d M m m m r r w M N 0 u) IN w N u-) d d tJ, O r M W w h W O
4 N C to V N d N d N d O d u7 Y, d In J to O I^ d M M d - u. O O d d O N W M m_ N M N N Io O M C O M d
N m D) n d w M tV w h w r fV r M co u) N In d M w V n w r d u7 rn O w rr a, G d w M h d d M d W m N O d w N w
O (n E Q. O W u7 O M N M M O N O M C •- to w CA N_ M In M (i to M M In M If) CA OD OLD
_ _ O u, E (o to !n Z Z Z n Imo u] N M M Z w N (n c L w to m w u] O N U W w d tf) I� N W w m M d r M d M U U) CO w n w m w d M to M n ry n to Nm M m w to h n u7 a� r Ul u, O w n M 0 w p M N m
J, U N M d N w r w tT O N M d m w N w O O N M d W wrw a) O N M d w w r w C) O N M d m wrw a) O N M d m w N w a, O N M d u') wnw Z CY" L.i d Z Z Z L Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z z z z z Z z V7 Z V Z Z z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z V) z In In z V) Z Z Z Z In In W Z Z Z N In Z W m W m Z W U7 u) N w ul w !r v) W (/) ll) Z Z
_.. f` 71 0 fl O- C7 - - .- - N N N N N N N N N N M M M M M M M M M M d d d t R V d d d d u) w u) m m W to W u] N w w w w w w 4) W w Q y Q
I J , J (V I J I`' t'V tV (v tV IN (V N IN N IN N N N N N IN N N N N N N N N N (V N N N N N N N N N N N CV N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N VA (V N N N CV N N N J 3 E
1 , I -1 J _J J J J J J J -J J J J J J J J J J J J J .J ) J J J _I .J -) J J J J J J _J _J J J -I J J J J J J J J J J J _1 J _I -1 J- P2� O /
LO O 3 / (� N M d to w n m M O (Al M I u) w N w M O N M d to ID r (D Cr U N M d (n w r w m p N M d to w N m M O N M d to w N m m O N n d u) w N m m O � N n d to w r w M O
\ Z O o 0 0 0 0 0 0 . - - IN f J IN , J If N CA N (V f, M M M M M M M ) M n d d d R d o1 d d d d w W to In Vi In u u) (f) In to ID w w w w w to w w r '� r r f r r r f r w w w w m w
b ( Dwwwwwwwinw (Dw�DwwwwwwwLL,wwwwwwwwwww wwwwwwww wwwwwwwwwLDtDwwwwwwwwwlDwwwwwwo r)'D c Dwwwwwwwwwwww
0 in d w N w d M p 0 w 47 d' m a, 0 0 0 tT M d to m o m M 0 m In C O P 1- d N p w N r M w O w W w N M E -J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J _l _J J J J J _,
I) w O r o r to p M N a, p N N d w 0 L) N o M to O 0 O d o N d M 0 0 0 w r d CJ M (D N O M N d w O U CO \ N J _J 1 J 1 J I J J) _I J _J J J J J J I J J J J J J J J J J) J J
J, III U M m O m N 0 M d d O) M N ❑� .-- W M N d m 0 a) d n M N W M W 90 _ < r J J J J J J J ) J J J 1 _1 J J J J _I , _l 1 _J , J _1 J J J 1 J
ul in M u) w M (D (D In O N In m N In a0 In CA N a, In n D) w O n CID (D w rn N
a U J, t`, tD w O r ul Cn r N w (T r 01 O) w al w N m N N N r w al QI In 1f] r� pO In pp N N .�- �- N r w N N w to N L
a (Q
W v °ry n .11c7CL3 ° o�D mil_
Q N
O � � b
I,. III I I LIJ W w IIJ IL1 W W III w w Www W W W w W Wl W ILA 3 w III ill to w W 3 3 3 3 3 3; 3 3? 3 w 3 W 3 3 3 3; 3 3 w Lo W w w w w w Q u('
r (J U r d d M d V O M u) JT N N W ar - d O N (V U_ ` ` r- r- in ✓, O) a ID d m E� tJ D 3 E tp w to N N N M N to d N M d N N W w w d w d to W 'i' r f O r, �) I� Ir) w i J w w O) w In N In a u) (J) M to M Y) w N a1 w w In w U w In d d Ul d
_ 1 h r r u)' -IMOtc u)w Jw(nrn h Mwu",01 InoMMM� N
W N 1� n U d d 01 w a) G V r, W- N In ID + p, i7 d- (f' L u (( 0. w J d m N C) C C tl. p w h w d If) U Ir M W I
O 0 W N u) d M N d N M M O to N N u) N m CA d d !- N N In M M N d w N d w N d "') - G M M d .- d O d ° Ol Q d W4 w n tT d W w d w M U) w d d d d d N N O N M N O W N V) u) W N d G d m .- O n ,1 1 +' O, M r r I„ iJ rJ o w 0
CJ w w N d u) d O N w U U U] h (T a) d h d O m w m O N w w w N d M p w 0 O m O n to N W S )
O v S _ 94 rn- dmr wolf- o,drtn rnwwNN)rn M
L _ O E _ m to d W N w M N w d u) m w m to tV M N O N O w w N d
E E o i M tC` M )1] d d M m d M w N N M d w w N d M to d d N M d d u. r M W M d V M N N Mi N S M d d N M w M w N r7 M d U7 d W M d N W M d N d N w d d w O) N d d d w w d W
M M p (V d M O N III to LV O N M Ln r- d d O Ir W M w N d M d M N d M- O d O M d d d U) M O Q W5 2 O I_n - E v,
W w U, w w u7 d w M M In io O n m M m O d N P w lT d N 0 a, w N w w d w M ) U lV M w N O M O (D ^ r w w lD \ r E E E N ° 'm
N C LL w u) N I!) to w d M w d N w d w M N M O It N to M w d w d rV M M O CJ - M N r) n m w W M W w w u] u) N E p Ifj E < ^
V) N V) In W V) In Ul W N V) N to W m W V) W v) V7 U, W W Z 7 L Z Lo m Z Z Z Z z Z E 3 F ; N to ic
GO \ / '^ .j "497 W496 W4 JE wwwwwww W w W www33ww wwww W w ww towww w III ICJw ( �\
E 1169 W49 E _ w w ;wwwwwwwwLtjwwwwww33 w; ;wwww; 333 wwwww3333 w3wwwwwwwww
U u1 W$ ,( Q \� _Z O d d O N r N M N O N d to N ry d (n I.-V In N w N d r') u) M d N to u] to N u' O N d u) O (n V W u M qJ u 3 l J W N w w N d tf) r u. J m lT N N O m a) M M N u, N w n^ w d U U N w IN f`J
W If W5CT d M Nj P d M d tV to to u7 In M d d in N d O N d m 10 M d ._ M M to d M d O N o O M O u7 d O M O N d w
i d N M d
in w r w 07 U �, N M d u) w n w a) O N M d to w r w O) O ^ N M d u] w r w a) O N M d w tD N w m 0� N M d In w n m a t] E W5D9 r 1 W j� .-1Cp/ f d d L G �, . In N w w "') d N `� NO N d o to d r- N M d d O I•) r N to N O r r (D r O a, w r w O ul O O d w N w M O a, (D M N d. d a, r m tP d w w w w M a) to to u] a, to u) r tf) \
r V V d V V d d d d W u) U] m V) U7 to to In w w w w w www D r r r h r h r N r w w m w aD m w m W O O, tT 0) a) 0, O) a) v E m E /1 E Jj�j E W ,� r to to d N , G M d_ M N O d , N M 7 P d 7 I J N O d d to O d M (`) M d u) I., In ) o to M to M O u7 M d O CA �- M u7 O N- � \ fD
_ _ _ _ �, pp ID - n N C m O In M w r O M M Y) n M M u) w O 15) 0) w C n ,O w R W r u1 - M r U M M i2
fl f J J J J J J J J J J -I J J J J J J J J J 't J J J J J J �J J J -J J J J J J J J W N O an d u, N w I M w w ) V to h u) D N w w h N w d LLJ w tU d d N w I`) N t. (� r _ 07 M d rT N O w r- M O m v) N N d M N N) w w w w N M w 0 u, C C
J J _I _I J J J J J J J �J J J J J J J �+ r7 O H 3 �N i V, z to I N N In z 7_ Z Z z Z z z Z Z Z Z Z (n V, 7 V) N N W V1 V, O w n w u f IJ m M n r to d O U o. _ q O o u, N n w N m d w d M
V E t0 \0 N h W V) U] l7 ul Ll z Z u) u, V) U) Ul Z Z U7 V) Ul u) V) V) In N V) W U1 z Z Z Z O N O d O- - r r w r u) �_ G
Q � Z � V15 E y1 F L❑ lI) V, (n W W W W m (0 7 Z 7 Z Z Z Z Z m (/, V) V1 V1 C`1 N L25B
r_ N _ O I "
O Q O E a E <'.
f t)r Urn CJOwr whr0mO MM mNM od wMmNwtowNN0 NNu) NMO r,wdInO ; e51�Ktfj _ W, Jylc / J Z Q 11_ `�--�� F<<--0
a, „7 01 r N m d W m to d a) a, N m d f' - O )V to w `r CJ w N 0) 'V to O M _ / S N w w (T O- N M d u) uJ r 0.) a, O U
O 3 \ W h W m O N M d to w r 0 0 r M d to w r F N M d U) wnw T O N M V u) w r m rn V N M d m w r w T O N M d u7 w n Q
V v ID M w J, ) W ,d U u) M M O d 0 M D N W n N d M U N) N w U p 0 (n U N "r ^ O u) w O O N p r, Q IE E - J (V V J J V lV N N V M 1 ) ) 1 , , d `J V d d R V R d d If1 w T O N M d u7 w r W a, C u] Z
N i 1wrn d MoN wornmN w M- odommo wm wLDOUlwrnod �u7mv)Inw� �rnnm J b N Z u)w )u u7wLL)wu u)w nu)V riu)u)toInIntoIntou,u u,u wu oww riwu)u) nu)u u, nu)wu w« I wwwwwr r rhr, r r r N r` wawwmwmmww n n Ta ca)rn Trnsc OO Q N
n In I) to u) a)wu)Inro In in u) to totnwu]u)u)u)u)tnmu7wwu7w wtnwwlnntnrowwwwu)wwrou7lntc
ID tT ry N N W N N N N U O E r E f �� J J J J J J J J J J J J J J -J J J J J J _, J _J J -) J J J J J J _J J J J J J J J J J J _J ) J J J _J J J J J J _l -J _J J J J J J _I J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J_ % N N M ry t1 \(, 1, 1 Ci N a Q a
W / to �E ; / Y 3 Vt M ss 030 (n It,
N 3f- wE (V U , o r'3 ; ;. `\ m wt7\"1
333 ww33 3333 w3wwl•Iwwwww ;I�w3331.Iww3.3333 3333ww W Wd E �'� F, o, G �d W Cr Li
N r N f J V M1 d N I J` M d r- w M d N m W w W / 1 `
N _ to )N d MwmI, M oN wMU JM /`. M u ^ W1208 i o \� J 'Z .-
t V M CJ w N W w In to O d N M d 4 d M N^ �- U7 N M d d o, 0 o u7 Q N E %
v C d Y) d d N d N O d W tV O O W O N d - V ii //' i)
u l I V O w V M W CJ f` N U M d O r d to w M a o n ul T w N M O O N m w M N Up M r a w M N M o O d Q °� 3 F L F n N N 1713 1{7a'J Z u' a O O
\ [r / W120 a v
I" J N N U N v- IN U M .- O M O N M M in ''', O O O N u) f) d u7 O M `r d O O M N N O O P d d 0
w m d M d d m N o m M u) o w N r R m N o o r u) w m M M f- M M Y d �. m h = EW523 ��I)`L z _d > Q / ��W d ,,, �W t9 O
U1 u V In M O M J) U U p O O d w w w W w d N O d- M, w M U d O M w M N O O V N Y ) d
,) I L Z L Z L Z z z z z z z z z z z z z z Ln w w z z z z z z v, z z z z z z z z z z z z z z v) z O� �, V ks� o a �u � W Z k! 2 �° 0}� �, ryh� �� �� d � O
\Q v ,� z v E r i / ° 'Jy `wt 222 t2 \ryryo U l0 V)
o Q o z Ir a W I - �\ 1\ Z Q Ln W
uY u o O Lu
U J N M d u7 w h w V, U N M d N w r w a) o N M d w w r m C, O N Y) d 1n w r to S G N. N M d to w r to N O 2 N �- `J Z i'Q 0 f \ a �\ N-H1�O �`ryh \ry d P \� O m / W E"
U O O O O O O U O O_ _ - •- CJ N N N N N N N N N M I r) M Y M M N M O (� d _ O -� - / O ---\ / IN v ry Y J
J J J J J J) I J J J J-1 1 1 ) J J J ) J J J _J 1 _1 J _J _J J 2 Z `L } ' 1// \ J 3= \ r = 41V O Q LLJ F
p. a y '� W In Q.
a I- , / / `, J I`D <84 \� / Y O W /''4 0'�' `o�ry X226 .` U FQ--a La
O O•b LLJ
u Nwu)C'i �� °DO rn�oornomcwnoF)as) oor n v°woor%1�w �oN°r° w �r 2� w z� E 1 4' / �V Q ll r` 33 a--U
u) NIJNNww �MNpa omu]oa r�m�Nma na mn�NOud �: a� °NpaDp�Q °n I rn fit/ 3Y J� _ r M 3 N v
W w 0' - lT't fV N w (V tf) N N N _ N- J _ 3 N LL
Q
a Q
Z LO co O v 3 ,W1231 _� ���T0 cr
z3w33 ;3w333333 jwwww3w33333R' 33 ;33;3333333 w3 ;3 W m o 1�
t Id I J) W d Y] w m CJ rn f- Oo a) O M d M Ni iD - w In w In N 1� I o M N a, V V, cr - w M 0 N d n w q] tD OU U U U E /3 W m / \ VI N W W II
v v u u) d d M d N M d In G C) ro o In CA - to o l d In In o d N M 0 o o 0 0 :mil d d G to M �O a °'� a a F n \ \g0 q0 �hh ry\
1 1' I J d IV [_) w Cn m- N O w u) m O M tT O n M W O O w u) M w r In d a' a, a, W fJ r O h I u) Q N d d d a O rn �% J 1 // .,4 \ Z
r, V d M d W (V ) O d V7 In d d O M O M M O M M M O O O O O M d W d N) O u7 (V O N N) N O m V, O W O ,,, `f, LLJ / Z \ , 3 It 0
i J d 0.1 tJ (A (() rl tJ d 0 Ul d d M O 0 0 d d N w O a1 w r w m N m w V W 0 1`) IN M N d Mtn w r r w Q o Nom, O a E ` (- O N \ \ 00 l/) II a II Y W
r` d I J W ul u) m w M P w M - O O O O M d M In r U') M In d M w m N w w w m d n W O N m M \ /
L) v] () In Ll Vl to z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z In V, In vl (n oo w v1 W z In w (n V7 to 0 v) In to o O U / J F _� \, 3 ") �) 253 '+ �• to a (n a a=�j
( rI Q N�4'i '� fnV)4J WO
w p w 1J m w LL G w o ,rI F-- Q I/ W W1185 3 - rSy \` \\ 11 J 7 V7
t\ _ Z p V) p p N Z V) E w LL Z W
1- N O OO W r, \ (i 1 `ti t`) IJJ
W c rn m N� ; \ \ ^ a' W\ `~\ r yJZ v u, / W 1 E Il I F L CAI
V) 71 I O m Ll O w O r J4 \ I� C, L - -
4 d 0 z a
u) w r w to a N M d u7 w r w T U N M d V) w r w (P C N M d u1 w r w T o N M d m w r �yf p.b �vl _n < Q a U M E Siq - r'j- `�' .z.4�p L244 a' O _+Ips!'� t^�V m a, \ -
r ., I d d d d In u) to In In In IC) to In It) (f) (D w w w w w w w r r N r r r n r` r n w (f) w w w (n w m h `� ` ' `
J = Tc #\ / r ul g� ` w N ti 12¢g F- L 1 .� V) �►
Q i !/ '_ ? ?`yam is o d A ( J3 n , P o W t11 I' J UU 1`v
") w M1301 << f \ '!, w o p !
��`.j }8 3M \ IJ_ LIJ t J
ar m n N� W598c v, `v W
rA
Ir w N m N w d d O m M w W m r N lT Q N w d M (P W M N d M O d ID N N U') r M w 00,
J6 f d 2811 _
d CAL d d d M p, O O M to h O N C W60 d d u7 N b ) ) c L\
OD w In N rn / \ J/ ✓`l -,t \ " (n v t` 62 `a W 0 N \ > .mil
/4. , a 4 4 u, tl 1. 1O C24 Io N v+t266 \ ID t24B W7
?5
I, In I ww - inwmtno)rnrno4Gw Q c n / _ u,
" N m M d w N d d W W r (n n 0 I, - L J n C) I
r od Nw r rnd -Odr W du110 N hw Oct `3 .n N. m u, \ ZLI d Wc(i
ton D w d L2 ,a LD \1 A� `'C L1 J-) U I
U N n d M M N w N M u) r d O) w r O N M M J � L P 4 ra= to `}1 `L
In E '3 tP V: V � v" � 7 iC
LI r� d d d w W w M w u7 li, d w m 1!i M N N .- .- N 2 \ '- t< d d .. __
' h 3 rn +.ton N r vJ Y, v I, I V 4 Q N r Li v ~
rn (°v E a) _ _ �* < ° Q ►'� Q o Mf3/1 �i ` 3� a'Fryy �5A zS2 Wtt�t \
o
L� 4 to WP ?53
2 3 3 3 3 w 3 3 3 3 w w 3 3; 3 w 3; ; 3 3 3 3 3; 3 3; 3 3 3 w 3; w 3 3 w 3; c w yah° - Li Lr1
to (" u1 o r M Ir, w o, iD �J In Of m o rn :o `n o m rn iv 1 d N E oLL ,1s' 'L� 4 W yp28�" ,Nt256 m \ -
111 ' •- - N N 1 IV O d M N N p M M d N d m M d d u, M N P M u) N d N) O IN O '- M LL) t` d /' d T :rJ O w � iT9 I \\ _' 4 IIJ F `r 1
a it I r) M d to d U _ ip r w N w w^ '07- w W tP N W M Nt d d U 1, m r` In d w u) w O u) C- 3 °- E ..
e z °
O O M to c, d d N N N d IN O- M d N P M in LO M d M TE 3 4 - 1 , '
IJ (J U f] d w V) d OD w O d (V Q1 m M V1 U] u) w r n W CO d (P M h O, M r to M W U 0, d M 0 ��9 C E s
Z lIl V u) In _ OD u1 M M r n N d w N d N M O d M N tV N N M d M M M n M 0 0 0 0 M C (V O w C h fsl n / O / \,
< 7 Z Z to L In V) U) V) W w V) 0 U7 U) in V, V) V) N N V, V) N V7 Ul V) V V) V, V) V) In V) V1 V7 V) N 1 m d / LL U J� ( - V _ - ♦ 1
o s IJ, / W/25 \ W 1 Jr )T 1 fL [ J I Z I i C U
Li
d �7r7
° B' U .-: CL CL �� r T L- L�j Z w c
f ms' \ 25 M 4 ', Y 4 N J I', II, `� nl a I vl NI M co Q
rn Ir, CI° n
u 4 /
L I p "An"' m wrw a, o N M d u] w N m M O N M d to w r CO m O n c d h �\ t< O S 2 z Lh m U) D W L . I \
N M d n w h m rn _ M l M M M ) M d d VJ ul O 1- 1- Q. T IY J
_ E o \ 4 >IJ1tr w \ Q 00 � v Y L� L I n (., L1 LJI I �� `I l
J J J J ~I fJ -f J ^I JA J J J _, -1 J J J J 1 of F- LL N O T l Z -,l LCJ
N N N CJ N N N N N N O N Z LL a b lY W V, I I I
-J J J _l 1 I J J _l J -J u) '+, 3 r) d
Z 4 u i1 t1 LL 4 ~ L L \ I LY �! LJI _ Ill
I n3 _ n Y o o n ,n d a= o U Q LJ1
LLJ
^ n t1 n w N_ 3 W E- `
U = y r lJJ I tJ o I I I I�
zn 1
1,9D_ r, Iv rJ 4 LL N d T M o 0 o Lil t �J U/
h E 3 ` I 4 4 r a LL `-v c e m n o f LL m L J
ea 1 92 n °u i, N 1 LL c, n rn ° a :,� a
L18J o v 3 oN u a' W I _ Lim N IL LJJ 1 1 J II
W62 ° ; d _ o \ lil uJ I �I
LL �J N� li Z _ LY 1 I, 11 liJ T 7 I I
` ud1 N (` LL LL n m \ t< _ h to m 4 \P s 1
w c o JIV 80c W581 W582 N E R N n 0 1 N 1i i, o o !h rn t, ' S} \+^ Z o E- C-1 f- LJJ I E O
W1325 A c _ 9 V� p u ° o Ii rn IL N ,1 _ Y In u CC Z l J I '✓ 4" 1 L/ , 1 I "� r
w m�b1 c c o18� N ♦ n.. �� N P.0 �ry u r4 4 :° ti u o W LL m \\ ; , �'
LLJ
_• S 1 r r LL i7 I I Q V/
° u, > r) _ t' LL 4 c N LL ., N m Z m U L IJ t [) L J
w N54 IE (� o c W w O n
c 61I Ir' L220 n ,,, u� m w n m rn rn = CY I ) _J LL (D l,J Q
cW61A cN 5 E to (n N � 4 (D t,, (, 4 to(w„ I, t, ii` W O O / V� L� 11l jj ) l2 1 W W U '�1
�� lLl J I Q W Q
E Ilr Q n \ LL e❑ a T LY. S 11. Q lJJ (Y' F- [� 7 �r� ED o / VL6 0 3 F f3 tcLL I- Z N Q L 4 [� tr, LL / n 4 rn z N Q i \p1�' u) H S Q lJJ L7 LL t, l F Q tIJ W
LO
W567 % 13 S '�) �iJ " m C. QL1 1+� v
N ks WS6j A eB �\S6S r 11 uri W55pkSS� m 3 N Ln u- �i t` d 3 N O \\\ _o / �-- LL.�
/ LLJ
E N E n LL .0 n N 3 n \\
E
LL- LL-
c ��r• Z
fl) W57 X91 /t(` f E 5 W556 � I{SS3 E LL o wi157 Y �`-, \a��'
,{ I I 0 0
C9 Q r 6❑ M E ^ /3 nrG r Q
o �m LL z F¢ r E tlw�) `° .,a o \ Q fQ, Q
�,• ye` Z O r- O ; , k W557 � E o, 4 4 ,1P�5� �\ Jiy 3 \ '�0\ tu \\ Li W W
c tQ ,. Y U') �` \� W5> i3, d N J o,
m _o .2 �.�6 0 0 4 m tD ,[�. _ W1053 \ fNV
m h•! � � 16! d Iu °
It) c Z m E E s6 W1155 m 3 y �. / Q Q Q
A 2 E�r, \ \\ �)
3 O ; 'E r,N•j [ TILL u 4 --�_� d Itoo W1153 WA50 r) Y
Z Nrj 4 4 O N r2 / C
3 c "�J �' e c L Ur' n Q l(1 Q yi� `h r o0 �J - 9CO Lt1 Y \r1,0`�0 \�\ Q mil. Q
\ c N 3J Z U a LO ! $ Q f-
1 1� L0 0 0
3 y O Q \ Z 913iM f-
H
Z Ln N N N
W d d d 03 d
U 1^ t` d N M7
ZtoLnmNLn
Q N N d
cV Ln W) OD
(� 't to 11) O
Q N to It O It
O N 11)
(n O O N 0
OOOCOOI
p 0 0 0 �}
Q N- N N O
to
• •
�Q Ln��
> N
W O
U V) N
Q � -
O p 01 O Ln N \ 3 N
O LJ7
U Lt] N r7
Z J t`
Qm
is o
Z33W33 <o
a I)oLnLnN
LLJ nLO"*10Ln
m 01 .- w to o
O M to r N O
O
O IninZ V)z
U
N fn d Ln
U
�p
^ti
J
a'
>_ ! 16
65
W
Z
U-
0
W '
O
O
W
t0 W in In m w m In In w to u) to d In r,-, W w a, a, m M d M N M M M 10
p O r N m 0 W M n N w 't r- d a, m N C) m M m m M W O d O r w N w V, OD O
w d N l J P O W O G - d d M N w O m N a) W r w N d w w to w d M d C
M r CO w N O 0 0 w d w 1w w w w O w a M O W M O T o N N M O w M w P N M T M N w N O w P w rn C", N r M M
Iw )
u) w CV d N V V N M N M N M N N N d M to N M W N M
IIi III w3 W W wwww It: w Lot Ww_wW 3333 Ww3333 W Lot 3 ;3333w ; ;3333333wwWw ;wwwwJUJ 3 jwww3ww•Lu Lot
I U, u IJ U a- u) w M IV r o N to N in w j� ` O 'ED M er) ry h d N p `d O w N M U d n V in r `W O w n w 00 U ID (V CID d `d �V Q Q, W d M �D u) F V, N O
d [- Lo:- d N N _- d M N to d d O 4-1,1:! W m d d. N d O N to N d 0 M N d d 0 to d W d In O N O. M N N O O W O d d m d u, N N N u7
u u) w n r t- d a) N O w d In w a) CO N M w m to a) d M �D d N to w r M In O O d N N 01 d M u] In N O W N N r M M w 0) M M O In M w N m 10 m 0) M G
1t1 tv V '1 ul M M d V G O d C d M LO d o o N M m LA to .- i- M O In 0 0 M M to o N N M G M U M to N N O M M O o to N M w M W N O ,f, '- d 0 rJ N
ud V ,M) N J w d ID w N r 0 u] w N I� O n r In d w w r M {0 M1 N N t W O CD VdI N N d In W d M w n d r rD r w (OD N M In IN m to w In p d w oD Nw) w
J to wwmwwm n(aNwN o IndMrnwwwtoCC) d
V) , N Z Z Z Z z Z m W Z Z m z w to to N W z z Z Z Z V) N m N N N Z N V) N Z 0 (o Z z Z Z z Z W In V) z W V) Z W Z Io !n Z Z W Z z N (/) W N Z z z
1U CT (D N M d m to n w M O N M d 0 w r w m O N M d in w N m o O N M d w w r m m 0 N M d W w n m M O N M d W w r m m 0 •- N M d u1 w
N N N f V N N Y N N IN M M M M M M M M M M d V d d V d d d d d to W w u) u) -) Ill to In In w w w W w w w w w w r t� h h h n r`
M M M M M M ) M M M M In M M M N) M M M M M "') M M M M M M M M M r, M M M M M M ) M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M
J _J J J J J _J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J a z > -- z�> m> M. � J
U - N 1 V d O N OD m w M to M N r w to It W o w m m m N O d p O N d d' w ID O M a0 N O r O N r,) m In w ID M w w In 0 w W 0 n 0 0) O O O to M M O w ID W
IN w in d M a, w O m o tT w d N r M r o O N m r w O m M a) m_ M IN n a, v m w O N w r IN w In O a, w w N u) h d V to M r d 0
") C)> h u) w M n w w m M W U N N d w w O C- w d w M m N d w d M M W N d N m M M m ") fT ", '� a, N G d 0 fV r, W m a) m In a) a, d a, O M w w N (T N d 0 M1
u, ') w I J N) d In d M w d d r w d w N d u] In m M N u) w 01 M 0 0 M M 10 M u) N � � M w r -- -- N N N
3 3; 3 3 3 3 w CIA Lot w w w w w 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 w w 3 3 w 3 3 W w uJ w w w W 3 w 3 3 w w aid 3 w to w 3 3 3 3 3 w 3 3 w 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3
r I f M 1 M D) N d m O) m IN M M m w d O N- d m n d V7 w N m to N pO N M (V d t', u7 j..) w N U) a) 0 n In � u) tV 'D N w U) w w a) M M w r w p w 4 N r n m w h
N I M N N d d- V N ul N M d O N d d d M u7 M M M W O O O m d M N a O O U7 - d N m d M d M 0 M p u) N M N u) O u) u) N- In d d d M M 117 O 0!0 p Io
u 1 C) N I- .- O to O 17) d r w w r 1 O w M 0) M M N N d 0) p O N d M N w O w r M u) to to N N a) to IV p W w n ^ w M m w 0 M1 m d h W m w N M n W 0) N
M M w N O In Y] N N O d O M d M d N7 M O ,A m d CV N 0 N d U7 W -- N a w p M p d m w M N M M M w V] N w u7 M N d d O d
Ii) U) M In to d N tT w In rn t7 m w 0) M M tT LD N O N m �`) M O w i'] tl] M (V u7 h u) N N O O u) N r N N (7, r u) [n u7 m w r N d O r7 In M 0, O w m N M m o d
r) r V tf) u) f q In v w W W h w N) r w d m w O M O r M M w O M d d d m G N M N O N m U O N O lV u) N O N O O O N In M O N M u7 In O w o N r M
L I C VI I Z U) In In V) W W Ln Z W (n 0 Z Z Z Z W !n W Z Z z z z Z Z Z z W (/) N N V) Ln W W In U) N U) U) N N W N W V) Z Z Z z Z z Z Z Z Z Z z Z Z Z z Z Z w In z to
u] w r m M O N M d N w r m 0) O •- N M d U'7 w N m O, O N M d In w N W M O N M d m w r m M O N M d In w h W M O N M d In w r m m O N M d m w r
r M, r1 r M d d d d d d d V d d N U) u) u) n In In N In N w w CO w w w w w IO If- r r r r 1- r n r r h W w W m W W w w w CO M a, M M M M M M M O) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
N t J (V t J I V N IV N N N N N N N N N (V N N N N N N N N N (V N N N N N N N N N^ rV N N N N N rJ N I N N N IN rV N N N N N (V N N (V N N N N N M N, M 'n M M M
S s c s i 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3
!
\I
L
i
W
W v) J
4 \'J9 1158 �\ 1 Vl (if
::3 W V)
N /
Ld \,
` �1=Za.
Q` z _j -J
aaZ°N° \
O m %
�o
W \< /
Z / a
O
W
W
N
V) LY
wo
O N
It
� W Q n
za: J OD
Q a- zN
WOm
F-
W
W Q
Mo=
; W %J 0 (L
Ljj J
Ian r
rn J Zm00
vI N
I m
� O
V) % v.
LJ
7°
h�
to
�.6.
P
rU
U�
r
nl
a
v
O
G
7
LLl-
4
I
IL
1
\ I I )
j I I
I
i
1 I
I
I i
1
i U
i zN
j ( Z
IL W
ZOO
It
L`tO NM
O
^nPq r-4�
a(L aaa-
tO 04 W) OD
N N � -
mmmmm
D O 0 6 6
W
w
�l
i
uewie£ueu8 JWy 9£ TO OT ZTOZ /E /OT Jbmp 3SVO \bmP \ZTOZ SCINVIGM 9IN30 )I\q3aIoJd\ 9
z m
U
;wto
ZON
Y ID
\
U
Z m
0O
N
\
.LZa
!
\
zoo
\
e
? zm
\ \\
!I t
O 0
>
/
t M
\
I�
\\
L`tO NM
O
^nPq r-4�
a(L aaa-
tO 04 W) OD
N N � -
mmmmm
D O 0 6 6
W
w
�l
i
uewie£ueu8 JWy 9£ TO OT ZTOZ /E /OT Jbmp 3SVO \bmP \ZTOZ SCINVIGM 9IN30 )I\q3aIoJd\ 9

F
I
�r
a
Ii
t,
�z
f3
r
>I\sPa[wd\
r
1

r;
r
S
�- ..-- L—U rvV �U LU Ul L &ULILIUL —V NozinvJ wu— lJuul4v/y\ \Lxv4J \C IUC �>UNV LL--M J1N:J0)ASI-^QLUa

STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA FIRM PANEL LOCATOR DIAGRAM
DATUM INFORMATION
The projection used in the preparation of this map was the North Carolina
State Plane (FIPSZONE 3200). The horizontal datum was the North American
Datum of 1983, GRS80 ellipsoid. Differences in datum, ellipsoid, projection, or
Universal Transverse Mercator zones used in the production of FIRMS for adjacent
jurisdictions may result in slight positional differences in map features across
jurisdictional boundaries. These differences do not affect the accuracy of this
FIRM. All coordinates on this map are in U.S. Survey Feet, where
1 U.S. Survey Foot = 1200/3937 Meters.
Flood elevations on this map are referenced to the North American Vertical
Datum of 1988 (NAVD 88). These flood elevations must be compared to structure
and ground elevations referenced to the same vertical datum. An average
offset between NAVD 88 and the National Geodetic Vertical Datum of 1929
(NGVD 29) has been computed for each North Carolina county. This offset was
then applied to the NGVD 29 flood elevations that were not revised during the
creation of this statewide format FIRM. The offsets for each county shown on
this FIRM panel are shown in the vertical datum offset table below. Where a
county boundary and a flooding source with unrevised NGVD 29 flood elevations
are coincident, an individual offset has been calculated and applied during the
creation of this statewide format FIRM. See Section 6.1 of the accompanying
Flood Insurance Study report to obtain further information on the conversion of
of elevations between NAVD 88 and NGVD 29. To obtain current elevation,
description, and /or location information for bench marks shown on this map,
please contact the North Carolina Geodetic Survey at the address shown below.
You may also contact the Information Services Branch of the National Geodetic
Survey at (301) 713 -3242, or visit its website at www.ngs.noaa.gov.
North Carolina Geodetic Survey County Average Vertical Datum Offset Table
121 West Jones Street County Vertical Datum Offset (ft)
Raleigh, INC 27601 Onslow - 1.05
(919) 733 -3836
www. ncgs. state. nc. us
Example: NAVD 88 = NGVD 29 + ( -1.05)
All streams listed in the Flood Hazard Data Table below were studied by
detailed methods using field survey. Other flood hazard data shown on this
map may have been derived using either a coastal analysis or limited detailed
riverine analysis. More information on the flooding sources studied by these
analyses is contained in the Flood Insurance Study report.
FLOOD HAZARD DATA TABLE
Floodw ay Width (feet)
�h
ti
Stream
Station
tpc
0
NEW RIVER
080
8,0421
11,400
I
I
093
9,3151
11,400
6.5
JONES
111
11,067 '
11,400
6.6
1,800 /1,000
154
15,354'
11,400
6.9
1,800 /1,100
159
15,928'
1 11,400
W
1,500 /1,100
167
16,7081
11,400
7.0
1,400 /1,100
(ima
17,526'
11,400
7.1
1,100 /1,100
186
18,570'
11,400
7.2
1,575/700
218
21,8341
2l��
7.5
4,250/85
228
o�h�
11,400
^�
4,250/275
237
23,7321
11,400
7.6
4,200/100
C�
CO
CO
a3°�
o�`'A
271
27,0541
11 ,
7.8
2,000/150
281
GO
�njrrl
���
U
1,600/650
sz�
V
1 2,5002
1 NA 11 6.6 4 406
LITTLE CREEK
032
`vJJ
vJJ V
6.6 `
19
045
4,480 2
NA
15.8
118
056
5,584 2
NA
17.6
57
073
7,2692
NA
21.5
154
. r
015
1 1,5003
NA 6.64 159
Feet above railroad 2 Feet above confluence w ith New River
3 Feet above confluence w ith Blue Creek ° Elevation includes backwater effects from New River
trxl`� lave
above should be used on insurance applications for the subject
10
,rV
community.
®
EFFECTIVE DATE MAP NUMBER
NOVEMBER 3, 2005 37204367001
h
ati
�ti
DATUM INFORMATION
The projection used in the preparation of this map was the North Carolina
State Plane (FIPSZONE 3200). The horizontal datum was the North American
Datum of 1983, GRS80 ellipsoid. Differences in datum, ellipsoid, projection, or
Universal Transverse Mercator zones used in the production of FIRMS for adjacent
jurisdictions may result in slight positional differences in map features across
jurisdictional boundaries. These differences do not affect the accuracy of this
FIRM. All coordinates on this map are in U.S. Survey Feet, where
1 U.S. Survey Foot = 1200/3937 Meters.
Flood elevations on this map are referenced to the North American Vertical
Datum of 1988 (NAVD 88). These flood elevations must be compared to structure
and ground elevations referenced to the same vertical datum. An average
offset between NAVD 88 and the National Geodetic Vertical Datum of 1929
(NGVD 29) has been computed for each North Carolina county. This offset was
then applied to the NGVD 29 flood elevations that were not revised during the
creation of this statewide format FIRM. The offsets for each county shown on
this FIRM panel are shown in the vertical datum offset table below. Where a
county boundary and a flooding source with unrevised NGVD 29 flood elevations
are coincident, an individual offset has been calculated and applied during the
creation of this statewide format FIRM. See Section 6.1 of the accompanying
Flood Insurance Study report to obtain further information on the conversion of
of elevations between NAVD 88 and NGVD 29. To obtain current elevation,
description, and /or location information for bench marks shown on this map,
please contact the North Carolina Geodetic Survey at the address shown below.
You may also contact the Information Services Branch of the National Geodetic
Survey at (301) 713 -3242, or visit its website at www.ngs.noaa.gov.
North Carolina Geodetic Survey County Average Vertical Datum Offset Table
121 West Jones Street County Vertical Datum Offset (ft)
Raleigh, INC 27601 Onslow - 1.05
(919) 733 -3836
www. ncgs. state. nc. us
Example: NAVD 88 = NGVD 29 + ( -1.05)
All streams listed in the Flood Hazard Data Table below were studied by
detailed methods using field survey. Other flood hazard data shown on this
map may have been derived using either a coastal analysis or limited detailed
riverine analysis. More information on the flooding sources studied by these
analyses is contained in the Flood Insurance Study report.
FLOOD HAZARD DATA TABLE
Floodw ay Width (feet)
LefVRight Distance From
the Center of Stream to
Encroachment Boundary
(Looking Downstream) or
Total Floodw ay Width
Cross
Section
Stream
Station
Flood Discharge
(cfs)
1 % Annual Chance
(1 00 -year)
Water Surface Elevation
(feet NAV D 88)
NEW RIVER
080
8,0421
11,400
6.5
1,450 /1,150
093
9,3151
11,400
6.5
1,450 /1,100
111
11,067 '
11,400
6.6
1,800 /1,000
154
15,354'
11,400
6.9
1,800 /1,100
159
15,928'
1 11,400
6.9
1,500 /1,100
167
16,7081
11,400
7.0
1,400 /1,100
175
17,526'
11,400
7.1
1,100 /1,100
186
18,570'
11,400
7.2
1,575/700
218
21,8341
11,400
7.5
4,250/85
228
22,7791
11,400
7.6
4,250/275
237
23,7321
11,400
7.6
4,200/100
261
26,051 '
11,400
7.7
2,450/300
271
27,0541
11 ,
7.8
2,000/150
281
28,1251
11
7.9
1,600/650
BLUE CREEK
025
1 2,5002
1 NA 11 6.6 4 406
LITTLE CREEK
032
3,200 2
NA
6.6 `
19
045
4,480 2
NA
15.8
118
056
5,584 2
NA
17.6
57
073
7,2692
NA
21.5
154
BRICK KILN BRANCH
015
1 1,5003
NA 6.64 159
Feet above railroad 2 Feet above confluence w ith New River
3 Feet above confluence w ith Blue Creek ° Elevation includes backwater effects from New River
2YARTkF
Tq
r Ij, o ti
FEMA'SGOOPERAiIIJG itCHNIL`ALPAR7MEH
--I ND SVG
This digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM) was produced through a unique
cooperative partnership between the State of North Carolina and the Federal
Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). The State of North Carolina has
implemented a long term approach of floodplain management to decrease
the costs associated with flooding. This is demonstrated b the State's com-
mitment to ma floodplain areas at the local level. As art of this effort the
P P P
State of North Carolina has joined in a Cooperating Technical State agreement
1 P 9 9
with FEMA to produce and maintain this digital FIRM.
www.ncfloodmaps.com
77° 28'00" 77° 27'30" JOINS PANEL 4368 77° 26'30"
2 460 000 FEET
380 000 FEETFT7�",
34° 47'00"
OXBOW
3851 000 M
34° 46'30"
3850 000 M
34° 46'00"
372 500 FEET
Onslow County
Unincorporated Areas
370340
34° 45'30"
3849 000 M -
370 000 FEETL�_-
2 460 000 FEET
This map is for use in administering the National Flood Insurance Program. It does not
necessarily identify all areas subject to flooding, particularly from local drainage sources
of small size. The community map repository should be consulted for possible updated
or additional flood hazard information.
T 0 obta in more detailed information in a r eas where B ase Fl ood Elevations (BFE
s
and /or floodways have been determined, users are encouraged to consult the Flood
Profiles, Floodway Data and /or Summary of Stillwater Elevations tables contained within
the Flood Insurance Study (FIS) report that accompanies this FIRM. Users should be
aware that BFEs shown on the FIRM represent rounded whole -foot elevations. These
BFEs are intended for flood insurance rating purposes only and should not be used
as the sole source of flood elevation information. Accordingly, flood elevation data
presented in the FIS report should be utilized in conjunction with the FIRM for purposes
of construction and /or floodplain management.
Coastal Base Flood Elevations shown on this map apply Y a only landward of 0.0'
North American Vertical Datum of 1988 (NAVD 88). Users of this FIRM should be
aware that coastal flood elevations are also provided in the Summary of Stillwater
Elevations tables in the Flood Insurance Study report for this jurisdiction. Elevations
shown in the Summary of Stillwater Elevations tables should be used for construction
and /or floodplain management purposes when they are higher than the elevations shown
on this FIRM.
NOTES TO
Boundaries of regulatory floodways shown on the FIRM for flooding sources studied
by detailed methods were computed at cross sections and interpolated between cross
sections. The floodways were based on hydraulic considerations with regard to requirements
of the National Flood Insurance Program. Floodway widths and other pertinent floodway
data for flooding sources studied by detailed methods as well as non - encroachment widths
for flooding sources studied by limited detailed methods are provided in the FIS report
for this jurisdiction. The FIS report also provides instructions for determining a floodway
using non - encroachment widths for flooding sources studied by limited detailed methods.
Certain areas not in Special Flood Hazard Areas may be protected by flood control
structures. Refer to Section 4.4 "Flood Protection Measures" of the Flood Insurance
Study report for information on flood control structures in the jurisdictions.
Base map information and geospatial data used to develop this FIRM were obtained from
various organizations, including the participating local commun state and federal
agencies, and /or other sources. The primary basis for this FIRM is aerial imagery acquired b
9 P rY 9 rY q Y
Onslow County. The time period of collection for the imagery is 2001. Information and
Y P 9 rY
data supplied b the local communit ies that met FEMA base ma specifications
geospatial PP Y Y( ) P P
were considered the preferred source for development of the base map. See geospatial
metadata for the associated digital FIRM for additional information about base map
preparation.
USERS
Base map features shown on this map, such as corporate limits, are based on the
most up -to -date data available at the time of publication. Changes in the corporate
limits may have occurred since this map was published. Map users should
consult the appropriate community official or website to verify current conditions of
jurisdictional boundaries and base ma features. This ma may contain roads that were
1 P P Y
not considered in the h yd r au li c analysis of streams where no new hydraulic model was
created during the production of this statewide format FIRM.
This map reflects more detailed and up -to -date stream channel configurations than
those shown on the previous FIRM for this jurisdiction. The floodplains and floodways
that were transferred from the previous FIRM may have been adjusted to conform to
these new stream channel configurations. As a result, the Flood Profiles and Floodway
Data tables in the Flood Insurance Study report (which contains authoritative hydraulic
data) may reflect stream channel distances that differ from what is shown on this map.
Please refer to the separately printed Map Index for an overview map of the county
showing the layout of map panels; community map repository addresses; and a Listing of
Communities table containing ational Flood Insurance Program dates for each community
9 9 Y
as well as a listing of the panels on which each is located.
If you have questions about this map, or questions concerning the National Flood
Insurance Program in general, please call 1- 877 -FEMA MAP (1 -877- 336 -2627) or visit the
FEMA website at www.fema.gov.
277 000 M
2 470 000 FEET
"r' 1 380 000 FEET
377 500 FEET
3851 000 M
ZONE AE
ZONE X
3850 000 M
X
3849 000 M
FAIIII 370 000 FEET
2 470 000 FEET
An accompanying Flood Insurance Study report, Letter of Map Revision (LOMB) or Letter
of Map Amendment (LOMA) revising portions of this panel, and digital versions of this
FIRM may be available. Visit the North Carolina Floodplain Mapping Program website
at www.ncfloodma s.com or contact the FEMA Ma Service Center at 1- 800 - 358 -9616
P P
for information on all related products associated with this FIRM. The FEMA Map Service
Center may also be reached by Fax at 1 -800- 358 -9620 and its website at www.msc.fema.gov.
MAP REPOSITORY
Refer to listing of Map Repositories on Map Index or visit www- ncfloodmaps -com.
EFFECTIVE DATE OF FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP PANEL
NOVEMBER 3, 2005
EFFECTIVE DATE(S) OF REVISION(S) TO THIS PANEL
For community map revision history P rior to statewide mapping, to the Community Map
History table located in the Flood Insurance Study report for this jurisdiction.
To determine if flood insurance is available in this community, contact your insurance agent, the
North Carolina Division of Emergency Management or the National Flood Insurance Program at the
following phone numbers or websites:
NC Division of Emergency Management National Flood Insurance Program
( 919) 715 -8000 www.nccrimecontrol.org /nfip 1- 800 -638 -6620 www.fema.gov /nfip
LEGEND
SPECIAL FLOOD HAZARD AREAS (SFHAs) SUBJECT TO
INUNDATION BY THE 1 % ANNUAL CHANCE FLOOD
The 1 % annual chance flood (100 year flood), also known as the base flood, is the flood
that has a 1 % chance of being equaled or exceeded in any given year. The Special
Flood Hazard Area is the area subject to flooding by the 1 % annual chance flood. Areas
of Special Flood Hazard include Zones A, AE, AH, AO, AR, A99, V, and VE. The Base
Flood Elevation is the water surface elevation of the 1% annual chance flood.
ZONE A No Base Flood Elevations determined.
ZONE AE Base Flood Elevations determined.
ZONE AH Flood depths of 1 to 3 feet (usually areas of ponding); Base Flood
Elevations determined.
ZONE AO Flood depths of 1 to 3 feet (usually sheet flow on sloping terrain);
average depths determined. For areas of alluvial fan flooding, velocities
also determined.
ZONE All Special Flood Hazard Area formerly protected from the 1% annual
chance flood by a flood control system that was subsequently
decertified. Zone AR indicates that the former flood control system is
being restored to provide protection from the 1% annual chance or
greater flood.
ZONE A99 Area to be protected from 1 % annual chance flood by a Federal
flood protection system under construction; no Base Flood Elevations
determined.
ZONE VE Coastal flood zone with velocity hazard (wave action); Base Flood Elevations
determined.
FLOODWAY AREAS IN ZONE AE
The floodway is the channel of a stream plus any adjacent floodplain areas that must be
kept free of encroachment so that the 1% annual chance flood can be carried without
substantial increases in flood heights.
OTHER FLOOD AREAS
ZONE X Areas of 0.2% annual chance flood; areas of 1% annual chance flood
with average depths of less than 1 foot or with drainage areas less than
1 square mile; and areas protected by levees from 1 % annual chance
flood.
OTHER AREAS
ZONE X Areas determined to be outside the 0.2% annual chance floodplain.
ZONE D Areas in which flood hazards are undetermined, but possible.
COASTAL BARRIER RESOURCES SYSTEM (CBRS) AREAS
OTHERWISE PROTECTED AREAS (OPAs)
CBRS areas and OPAs are normally located within or adjacent to Special Flood Hazard Areas.
1% annual chance floodplain boundary
0.2% annual chance floodplain boundary
Floodway boundary
- - Zone D Boundary
•••••••••••••••••••• CBRS and OPA boundary
- - - - - - - - - - Boundary dividing Special Flood Hazard Areas of different
Base Flood Elevations, flood depths or flood velocities.
513 Base Flood Elevation line and value; elevation in feet*
(EL 987) Base Flood Elevation value where uniform within zone;
elevation in feet*
*Referenced to the North American Vertical Datum of 1988
ois Cross section line
23 - - - - - - 23 Transect line
97° 07' 30" , 32° 22' 30" Geographic coordinates referenced to the North American
Datum of 1983 (NAD 83)
4276000M 1000 -meter Universal Transverse Mercator grid ticks, zone 18
1 477 500 FEET 2500 -foot grid values: North Carolina State Plane coordinate
system (FIPSZONE 3200, State Plane NAD 83 feet)
BM5510 North Carolina Geodetic Survey bench mark (see explanation
X in the Datum Information section of this FIRM panel).
BM5510 National Geodetic Survey bench mark (see explanation in
(9 the Datum Information section of this FIRM panel).
o M1.5 River Mile
Z&
GRID NORTE
MAP SCALE 1" = 500' (1 : 6,000)
250 0 500 1000
FEET
METERS
150 0 150 300
D
PANEL 4367)
FIRM
®
m
FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP
NORTH CAROLINA
®
O Cl
m
PANEL 4367
(SEE LOCATOR DIAGRAM OR MAP INDEX FOR FIRM
PANEL LAYOUT)
CONTAINS:
COMMUNITY CID No. PANEL SUFFIX
®
JACKSONVILLE, CITY OF 370178 4367 J
O CZ
ONSLOW COUNTY 370340 4367 J
VILNotice
to User: The Map Number shown below should be used
when placing map orders; the Community Number shown
above should be used on insurance applications for the subject
community.
®
EFFECTIVE DATE MAP NUMBER
NOVEMBER 3, 2005 37204367001
�yYART1t
�1
A' o
x
tn�• o �"
AND
SE
State of North Carolina
Federal Emergency Management Agency

STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA FIRM PANEL LOCATOR DIAGRAM
DATUM INFORMATION
The projection used in the preparation of this map was the North Carolina
State Plane (FIPSZONE 3200). The horizontal datum was the North American
Datum of 1983, GRS80 ellipsoid. Differences in datum, ellipsoid, projection, or
Universal Transverse Mercator zones used in the production of FIRMS for adjacent
jurisdictions may result in slight positional differences in map features across
jurisdictional boundaries. These differences do not affect the accuracy of this
FIRM. All coordinates on this map are in U.S. Survey Feet, where
1 U.S. Survey Foot = 1200/3937 Meters.
Flood elevations on this map are referenced to the North American Vertical
Datum of 1988 (NAVD 88). These flood elevations must be compared to structure
and ground elevations referenced to the same vertical datum. An average
offset between NAVD 88 and the National Geodetic Vertical Datum of 1929
(NGVD 29) has been computed for each North Carolina county. This offset was
then applied to the NGVD 29 flood elevations that were not revised during the
creation of this statewide format FIRM. The offsets for each county shown on
this FIRM panel are shown in the vertical datum offset table below. Where a
county boundary and a flooding source with unrevised NGVD 29 flood elevations
are coincident, an individual offset has been calculated and applied during the
creation of this statewide format FIRM. See Section 6.1 of the accompanying
Flood Insurance Study report to obtain further information on the conversion of
of elevations between NAVD 88 and NGVD 29. To obtain current elevation,
description, and /or location information for bench marks shown on this map,
please contact the North Carolina Geodetic Survey at the address shown below.
You may also contact the Information Services Branch of the National Geodetic
Survey at (301) 713 -3242, or visit its website at www.ngs.noaa.gov.
North Carolina Geodetic Survey County Average Vertical Datum Offset Table
121 West Jones Street County Vertical Datum Offset (ft)
Raleigh, INC 27601 Onslow - 1.05
(919) 733 -3836
www. ncgs. state. nc. us
Example: NAVD 88 = NGVD 29 + ( -1.05)
All streams listed in the Flood Hazard Data Table below were studied by
detailed methods using field survey. Other flood hazard data shown on this
map may have been derived using either a coastal analysis or limited detailed
riverine analysis. More information on the flooding sources studied by these
analyses is contained in the Flood Insurance Study report.
FLOOD HAZARD DATA TABLE
Floodway Width (feet)
LeWRight Distance From
the Center of Stream to
Encroachment Boundary
(Looking Downstream) or
Total Floodway Width
Cross
Section
Stream Station
Flood Discharge
(cfs)
(0�
NEW RIVER
306
30,628
11,300
S
I
JONE JON
31,684
11,300
8.1
1,425 / 2,325
328
32,791
11,300
8.2
1,000 / 1,950
340
34,040
11,300
8.3
ED
NORTH BRANCH AT LAURADALE SUBDIVISION
054
5,400
1 NA 11
17.5
26
rb"
i ��0
1 NA 11
30.2
1 105
SOUTH BRANCH AT LAURADALE SUBDIVISION
���
���
���
46 �`�
m
determined.
do
4210
Apo
�o
✓��
:JOU
J��
�o
�`o
��'
�1`b
��o
�0
:.JO
J�
� ' J�
v w
C�
CONTAINS:
el\
A
COMMUNITY CID No. PANEL SUFFIX
®
U
JACKSONVILLE, CITY OF 370178 4368 J
O CZ
ONSLOW COUNTY 370340 4368 J
�m
'kO�
VLNotice
tX
to User: The Map Number shown below should be used
pti6(b
when placing map orders; the Community Number shown
above should be used on insurance applications for the subject
community.
®
EFFECTIVE DATE MAP NUMBER
h
ati
rxti
DATUM INFORMATION
The projection used in the preparation of this map was the North Carolina
State Plane (FIPSZONE 3200). The horizontal datum was the North American
Datum of 1983, GRS80 ellipsoid. Differences in datum, ellipsoid, projection, or
Universal Transverse Mercator zones used in the production of FIRMS for adjacent
jurisdictions may result in slight positional differences in map features across
jurisdictional boundaries. These differences do not affect the accuracy of this
FIRM. All coordinates on this map are in U.S. Survey Feet, where
1 U.S. Survey Foot = 1200/3937 Meters.
Flood elevations on this map are referenced to the North American Vertical
Datum of 1988 (NAVD 88). These flood elevations must be compared to structure
and ground elevations referenced to the same vertical datum. An average
offset between NAVD 88 and the National Geodetic Vertical Datum of 1929
(NGVD 29) has been computed for each North Carolina county. This offset was
then applied to the NGVD 29 flood elevations that were not revised during the
creation of this statewide format FIRM. The offsets for each county shown on
this FIRM panel are shown in the vertical datum offset table below. Where a
county boundary and a flooding source with unrevised NGVD 29 flood elevations
are coincident, an individual offset has been calculated and applied during the
creation of this statewide format FIRM. See Section 6.1 of the accompanying
Flood Insurance Study report to obtain further information on the conversion of
of elevations between NAVD 88 and NGVD 29. To obtain current elevation,
description, and /or location information for bench marks shown on this map,
please contact the North Carolina Geodetic Survey at the address shown below.
You may also contact the Information Services Branch of the National Geodetic
Survey at (301) 713 -3242, or visit its website at www.ngs.noaa.gov.
North Carolina Geodetic Survey County Average Vertical Datum Offset Table
121 West Jones Street County Vertical Datum Offset (ft)
Raleigh, INC 27601 Onslow - 1.05
(919) 733 -3836
www. ncgs. state. nc. us
Example: NAVD 88 = NGVD 29 + ( -1.05)
All streams listed in the Flood Hazard Data Table below were studied by
detailed methods using field survey. Other flood hazard data shown on this
map may have been derived using either a coastal analysis or limited detailed
riverine analysis. More information on the flooding sources studied by these
analyses is contained in the Flood Insurance Study report.
FLOOD HAZARD DATA TABLE
Floodway Width (feet)
LeWRight Distance From
the Center of Stream to
Encroachment Boundary
(Looking Downstream) or
Total Floodway Width
Cross
Section
Stream Station
Flood Discharge
(cfs)
1 % Annual Chance
(100 -year)
Water - Surface Elevation
(feet NAVD 88)
NEW RIVER
306
30,628
11,300
8.1
450/2,550
317
31,684
11,300
8.1
1,425 / 2,325
328
32,791
11,300
8.2
1,000 / 1,950
340
34,040
11,300
8.3
1,615/950
NORTH BRANCH AT LAURADALE SUBDIVISION
054
5,400
1 NA 11
17.5
26
066
6,553
1 NA 11
30.2
1 105
SOUTH BRANCH AT LAURADALE SUBDIVISION
015
1 1,450
1 NA 11 12.6 86
Feet above mouth. 2 New River station referenced in feet above railroad.
?Z
0
�r
OFEMA'SGOOPEHA71Nii iEC:MNICRLPAHiNEH
iND 5�
This digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM) was produced through a unique
cooperative partnership between the State of North Carolina and the Federal
Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). The State of North Carolina has
implemented a long term approach of floodplain management to decrease
the costs associated with flooding. This is demonstrated b the State's com-
mitment to ma floodplain areas at the local level. As art of this effort the
P P P
State of North Carolina has joined in a Cooperating Technical State agreement
with FEMA to produce and maintain this digital FIRM.
www.ncfloodmaps.com
2 46i
390 000 FE
34° 48'31
3854 000 M
34° 48'01
a
u
cr
d
>n
Le
3853 000 M
34° 47'31
382 500 FE
3852 000 M
380 000 FEE
24
77° 28'00" JOINS PANEL 4369 77° 26'30"
77° 28'00" 77° 27'30" JOINS PANEL 4367 77'26'30''
This map is for use in administering the National Flood Insurance Program. It does not
necessarily identify all areas subject to flooding, particularly from local drainage sources
of small size. The community map repository should be consulted for possible updated
or additional flood hazard information.
T 0 obta in more detailed information in a r eas where B ase Fl ood Elevations (BFE
s
and /or floodways have been determined, users are encouraged to consult the Flood
Profiles, Floodway Data and /or Summary of Stillwater Elevations tables contained within
the Flood Insurance Study (FIS) report that accompanies this FIRM. Users should be
aware that BFEs shown on the FIRM represent rounded whole -foot elevations. These
BFEs are intended for flood insurance rating purposes only and should not be used
as the sole source of flood elevation information. Accordingly, flood elevation data
presented in the FIS report should be utilized in conjunction with the FIRM for purposes
of construction and /or floodplain management.
Coastal Base Flood Elevations shown on this map apply Y a only landward of 0.0'
North American Vertical Datum of 1988 (NAVD 88). Users of this FIRM should be
aware that coastal flood elevations are also provided in the Summary of Stillwater
Elevations tables in the Flood Insurance Study report for this jurisdiction. Elevations
shown in the Summary of Stillwater Elevations tables should be used for construction
and /or floodplain management purposes when they are higher than the elevations shown
on this FIRM.
NOTES TO
Boundaries of regulatory floodways shown on the FIRM for flooding sources studied
by detailed methods were computed at cross sections and interpolated between cross
sections. The floodways were based on hydraulic considerations with regard to requirements
of the National Flood Insurance Program. Floodway widths and other pertinent floodway
data for flooding ources studied b detailed methods as well as non - encroachment widths
9 Y
for flooding sources studied by limited detailed methods are provided in the FIS report
for this jurisdiction. The FIS report also provides instructions for determining a floodway
using non - encroachment widths for flooding sources studied by limited detailed methods.
Certain areas not in Special Flood Hazard Areas may be protected by flood control
structures. Refer to Section 4.4 "Flood Protection Measures" of the Flood Insurance
Study report for information on flood control structures in the jurisdictions.
Base map information and geospatial data used to develop this FIRM were obtained from
various organizations, including the participating local community(ies), state and federal
agencies, and /or other sources. The primary basis for this FIRM is aerial imagery acquired by
Onslow County. The time period of collection for the imagery is 2001. Information and
data supplied b the local communit ies that met FEMA base ma specifications
geospatial PP Y Y( ) P P
were considered the preferred source for development of the base map. See geospatial
metadata for the associated digital FIRM for additional information about base map
preparation.
USERS
Base map features shown on this map, such as corporate limits, are based on the
most up -to -date data available at the time of publication. Changes in the corporate
limits may have occurred since this map was published. Map users should
consult the appropriate community official or website to verify current conditions of
jurisdictional boundaries and base ma features. This ma may contain roads that were
1 P P Y
not considered in the h yd r au li c analysis of streams where no new hydraulic model was
created during the production of this statewide format FIRM.
This map reflects more detailed and up -to -date stream channel configurations than
those shown on the previous FIRM for this jurisdiction. The floodplains and floodways
that were transferred from the previous FIRM may have been adjusted to conform to
these new stream channel configurations. As a result, the Flood Profiles and Floodway
Data tables in the Flood Insurance Study report (which contains authoritative hydraulic
data) may reflect stream channel distances that differ from what is shown on this map.
Please refer to the separately printed Map Index for an overview map of the county
showing the layout of map panels; community map repository addresses; and a Listing of
Communities table containing National Flood Insurance Program dates for each community
as well as a listing of the panels on which each is located.
If you have questions about this map, or questions concerning the National Flood
Insurance Program in general, please call 1- 877 -FEMA MAP (1 -877- 336 -2627) or visit the
FEMA website at www.fema.gov.
U 500 FEET
3854 000 M
° 48'00"
i
r
C
3853 000 M
° 47'3D"
CARTERS GROVE CIR
3852 000 M
10 000 FEET
FEET
An accompanying Flood Insurance Study report, Letter of Map Revision (LOMB) or Letter
of Map Amendment (LOMA) revising portions of this panel, and digital versions of this
FIRM may be available. Visit the North Carolina Floodplain Mapping Program website
at www.ncfloodma s.com or contact the FEMA Ma Service Center at 1- 800 - 358 -9616
P P
for information on all related roducts associated with this FIRM. The FEMA Ma Service
P P
Center may also be reached by Fax at 1 -800- 358 -9620 and its website at www.msc.fema.gov.
MAP REPOSITORY
Refer to listing of Map Repositories on Map Index or visit www- ncfloodmaps -com.
EFFECTIVE DATE OF FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP PANEL
NOVEMBER 3, 2005
EFFECTIVE DATE(S) OF REVISION(S) TO THIS PANEL
For community map revision history P rior to statewide mapping, to the Community Map
History table located in the Flood Insurance Study report for this jurisdiction.
To determine if flood insurance is available in this community, contact your insurance agent, the
North Carolina Division of Emergency Management or the National Flood Insurance Program at the
following phone numbers or websites:
NC Division of Emergency Management National Flood Insurance Program
( 919) 715 -8000 www.nccrimecontrol.org /nfip 1- 800 -638 -6620 www.fema.gov/nfip
FLOODWAY AREAS IN ZONE AE
The floodway is the channel of a stream plus any adjacent floodplain areas that must be
kept free of encroachment so that the 1% annual chance flood can be carried without
substantial increases in flood heights.
OTHER FLOOD AREAS
ZONE X Areas of 0.2% annual chance flood; areas of 1% annual chance flood
with average depths of less than 1 foot or with drainage areas less than
1 square mile; and areas protected by levees from 1 % annual chance
flood.
OTHER AREAS
ZONE X Areas determined to be outside the 0.2% annual chance floodplain.
ZONE D Areas in which flood hazards are undetermined, but possible.
COASTAL BARRIER RESOURCES SYSTEM (CBRS) AREAS
OTHERWISE PROTECTED AREAS (OPAs)
CBRS areas and OPAs are normally located within or adjacent to Special Flood Hazard Areas.
1% annual chance floodplain boundary
0.2% annual chance floodplain boundary
Floodway boundary
- - Zone D Boundary
•••••••••••••••••••• CBRS and OPA boundary
Boundary dividing Special Flood Hazard Areas of different
Base Flood Elevations, flood depths or flood velocities.
513 Base Flood Elevation line and value; elevation in feet*
(EL 987) Base Flood Elevation value where uniform within zone;
elevation in feet*
*Referenced to the North American Vertical Datum of 1988
ms Cross section line
23 - - - - - - 23 Transect line
97° 07' 30" , 32° 22' 30" Geographic coordinates referenced to the North American
Datum of 1983 (NAD 83)
4276000M 1000 -meter Universal Transverse Mercator grid ticks, zone 18
1 477 500 FEET 2500 -foot ggrid values: North Carolina State Plane coordinate
system (FIPSZONE 3200, State Plane NAD 83 feet)
BM5510 North Carolina Geodetic Survey bench mark (see explanation
X in the Datum Information section of this FIRM panel).
BM5510 National Geodetic Survey bench mark (see explanation in
(9 the Datum Information section of this FIRM panel).
a M1.5 River Mile
Z&
GRID NORTE
MAP SCALE 1" = 500' (1 : 6,000)
250 0 500 1000
FEET
METERS
150 0 150 300
LEGEND
1 FEET
SPECIAL FLOOD HAZARD AREAS (SFHAs) SUBJECT TO
10 000 FEET
INUNDATION BY THE 1 % ANNUAL CHANCE FLOOD
The 1 % annual chance flood (100 year flood), also known as the base flood, is the flood
that has a 1 % chance of being equaled or exceeded in any given year. The Special
Flood Hazard Area is the area subject to flooding by the 1 % annual chance flood. Areas
of Special Flood Hazard include Zones A, AE, AH, AO, AR, A99, V, and VE. The Base
®
Flood Elevation is the water surface elevation of the 1% annual chance flood.
ZONE A No Base Flood Elevations determined.
ZONE AE Base Flood Elevations determined.
ZONE AH Flood depths of 1 to 3 feet (usually areas of ponding); Base Flood
Elevations determined.
ZONE AO Flood depths of 1 to 3 feet (usually sheet flow on sloping terrain);
average depths determined. For areas of alluvial fan flooding, velocities
also determined.
ZONE AR Special Flood Hazard Area formerly protected from the 1% annual
®
chance flood by a flood control system that was subsequently
° 48'30"
decertified. Zone AR indicates that the former flood control system is
being restored to provide protection from the 1 % annual chance or
O Cl
greater flood.
ZONE A99 Area to be protected from 1 % annual chance flood by a Federal
flood protection system under construction; no Base Flood Elevations
m
determined.
ZONE VE Coastal flood zone with velocity hazard (wave action); Base Flood Elevations
determined.
U 500 FEET
3854 000 M
° 48'00"
i
r
C
3853 000 M
° 47'3D"
CARTERS GROVE CIR
3852 000 M
10 000 FEET
FEET
An accompanying Flood Insurance Study report, Letter of Map Revision (LOMB) or Letter
of Map Amendment (LOMA) revising portions of this panel, and digital versions of this
FIRM may be available. Visit the North Carolina Floodplain Mapping Program website
at www.ncfloodma s.com or contact the FEMA Ma Service Center at 1- 800 - 358 -9616
P P
for information on all related roducts associated with this FIRM. The FEMA Ma Service
P P
Center may also be reached by Fax at 1 -800- 358 -9620 and its website at www.msc.fema.gov.
MAP REPOSITORY
Refer to listing of Map Repositories on Map Index or visit www- ncfloodmaps -com.
EFFECTIVE DATE OF FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP PANEL
NOVEMBER 3, 2005
EFFECTIVE DATE(S) OF REVISION(S) TO THIS PANEL
For community map revision history P rior to statewide mapping, to the Community Map
History table located in the Flood Insurance Study report for this jurisdiction.
To determine if flood insurance is available in this community, contact your insurance agent, the
North Carolina Division of Emergency Management or the National Flood Insurance Program at the
following phone numbers or websites:
NC Division of Emergency Management National Flood Insurance Program
( 919) 715 -8000 www.nccrimecontrol.org /nfip 1- 800 -638 -6620 www.fema.gov/nfip
FLOODWAY AREAS IN ZONE AE
The floodway is the channel of a stream plus any adjacent floodplain areas that must be
kept free of encroachment so that the 1% annual chance flood can be carried without
substantial increases in flood heights.
OTHER FLOOD AREAS
ZONE X Areas of 0.2% annual chance flood; areas of 1% annual chance flood
with average depths of less than 1 foot or with drainage areas less than
1 square mile; and areas protected by levees from 1 % annual chance
flood.
OTHER AREAS
ZONE X Areas determined to be outside the 0.2% annual chance floodplain.
ZONE D Areas in which flood hazards are undetermined, but possible.
COASTAL BARRIER RESOURCES SYSTEM (CBRS) AREAS
OTHERWISE PROTECTED AREAS (OPAs)
CBRS areas and OPAs are normally located within or adjacent to Special Flood Hazard Areas.
1% annual chance floodplain boundary
0.2% annual chance floodplain boundary
Floodway boundary
- - Zone D Boundary
•••••••••••••••••••• CBRS and OPA boundary
Boundary dividing Special Flood Hazard Areas of different
Base Flood Elevations, flood depths or flood velocities.
513 Base Flood Elevation line and value; elevation in feet*
(EL 987) Base Flood Elevation value where uniform within zone;
elevation in feet*
*Referenced to the North American Vertical Datum of 1988
ms Cross section line
23 - - - - - - 23 Transect line
97° 07' 30" , 32° 22' 30" Geographic coordinates referenced to the North American
Datum of 1983 (NAD 83)
4276000M 1000 -meter Universal Transverse Mercator grid ticks, zone 18
1 477 500 FEET 2500 -foot ggrid values: North Carolina State Plane coordinate
system (FIPSZONE 3200, State Plane NAD 83 feet)
BM5510 North Carolina Geodetic Survey bench mark (see explanation
X in the Datum Information section of this FIRM panel).
BM5510 National Geodetic Survey bench mark (see explanation in
(9 the Datum Information section of this FIRM panel).
a M1.5 River Mile
Z&
GRID NORTE
MAP SCALE 1" = 500' (1 : 6,000)
250 0 500 1000
FEET
METERS
150 0 150 300
D
PANEL 4368)
FIRM
®
FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP
NORTH CAROLINA
®
O Cl
m
PANEL 4368
(SEE LOCATOR DIAGRAM OR MAP INDEX FOR FIRM
PANEL LAYOUT)
CONTAINS:
COMMUNITY CID No. PANEL SUFFIX
®
JACKSONVILLE, CITY OF 370178 4368 J
O CZ
ONSLOW COUNTY 370340 4368 J
VLNotice
to User: The Map Number shown below should be used
when placing map orders; the Community Number shown
above should be used on insurance applications for the subject
community.
®
EFFECTIVE DATE MAP NUMBER
NOVEMBER 3, 2005 31204368001
CD
A .n
' G
AND
r•
Sti
State of North Carolina
Federal Emergency Management Agency