20040243 Ver 1_Mitigation Info_20120710

�-- 11 114 - oa-4�
wcu� Q-` oq--
®s stem
E a cemeht
PROGRAM
MEMORANDUM
TO
THROUGH
FROM
DATE
RE
Amy Chapman
Ar
Tim Baumgartner
Kristie Corson `((F„
July 2 2012
12@2aeED
JUL 1 0 2012
Closeout Request for Whitelace Creek Mitigation Site (EEP IMS #420)
The Whitelace Creek Mitigation Site is located in Lenoir County in the Neuse 02 watershed
The 6" year monitoring for the site concluded in November 2011 While in field reviewing
nearby sites, buffer assets were evaluated in the field by DWQ (Katie Merritt and Eric Kulz) and
EEP (Kristie Corson and Tim Baumgartner) staff on June 13 2012 Based upon the onsite
review EEP revised the enclosed asset map accordingly and request closure of the site s buffer
assets generating 13 66 acres (595 134 square feet) of buffer mitigation
Perpetual site protection will be maintained by
Eric Galamb
Stewardship Program
Office of Conservation Planning and Community Affairs DENR
1601 Mail Service Center
Raleigh NC 27699
919 715 8696
Please find attached a copy of the 6th year monitoring report a map detailing the final
enumeration of credits and a credit /debit ledger We respectfully request your concurrence to
officially close out the buffer assets of Whitelace Creek Mitigation Project
cc Jeff Jurek
Jim Stanfill
File
Rstort ftg Prot7e�tt a� OW St-A& � �NR
North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program 1652 Mail Service Center Raleigh NC 27699 1652 / 919 715 0476 / www nceep net

•
Cl�
a ppl:
4�
v
V
U
m
4�
+r
zw°
0
'o
N
0
O
cd
W 4''
w
M
cn V4
� V
GA
a,
v�
44
U
0
Z
b
I
w
o
�
y
4-4
b
W
H
c�
fm
can
looftN
�
v
�
100ON
;.4
V
M
..�
a�
00
N
.
M
•O
��
N
O
�
�
v
v
cn
Cl)
0
O
cd
W 4''
w
M
cn V4
� V
GA
a,
v�
44
U
0
Z
b
I
O
O
O
O
O
O
°
°
N
C
a,
U
W W W
III
o
y
4-4
b
W
H
c�
fm
can
O
O
O
O
O
O
°
°
N
C
a,
U
W W W
III

N
0
a
U
N
a
Q
d
U N
a
W N
O N
� O
W
� v Z o
d
E
A
Z
m
°- y R 'm
R ? m 0
rna d R
"W? 15 rL W iE 0
snioydsoyd
ON
uafioJl!N ON
(ta19P) j"m
unWS Ip4�t
(is) RIuO losll0
luaulnNjabng
0
0
0
0
0
0
v
v
o
M
(h
W
O1
W)
ui
0)
Lo
ys�eW lelseo
luawa0ueyu3
ys.iew !elseo0
uo!leaa0
ysiew jeise00
uo!lejolsau
ysiew !else00
uo!lenJasaM
ueueduuoN
lu8w80ue4u3
ueueduuoN
u0yeaJ0
ueueduuoN
uopejolsall
ueueduuoN
M
O
Cl)
O
r
r
n
o
rn
O
�i
o
o
°•
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
O
O
of
M
0)
m
of
o
rn
V
c
N
O
000
^
� O
O
O
O
M
O
0)
Cl)
u) 00
(D 0)
O
V
O
00
O
V
N
N
a)
co
c
(1)
o
U
E
rn
c
o o
N
o
M
m
o
m>
0
Z
N
U
N
C
N U
A-)
�
It m
a
m� U
m 0
x z
Up
a
a 0
2
c
N
oaz
�' F p)
Erna
'O
O
a~
c
N
cu C
!-
c a)
F- 0)
-, c
a
a a
@=
Q
o
N
a
Q V
U
D .�
O..
m�
s 0
Y
>
Q a)
a
Z
Z U
2 a
(a U a
U Z D
c
Q
U—
Z
N
O
O
00
U) (D
N V
v
C
O
m
O
Lo
O
U
Q
0)
m
Q
0)
(7 I,-
o O
O 0)
U
o
Q
o
U)
U
�
N
a)
Co
V
I`
co
O O
00 N
V 00
V
(D
(D
d C
U C
(/)
m
L7
l0
l0
�
O
N
O m
V
aJ
c
L
C d0
a
O
9.
(`
9
6)
9 7
aD (o
92
co
0
'p
-'
O
0
O 0)
0) 0)
0)
d
d
C14
N
—
N
—
N
w
�a�o
—
m
c
C a
(Ui
ca'i
c
m
�W
R
m
W
m
c O
o
m
60
a
mzw

BK1427PGO28I
MARGARET SEYMOUR
RELENOIR COUNTY DEEDS
05 MAY 31 PM 3 19
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
CONSERVATION EASEMENT
LENOIR COUNTY
SPO File Number 54 -k
Prepared by Office of the Attorne) General
,Y
roperty Control Section
Return to Blane Rice State Property Office
1321 Mail Service Center
Raleigh NC 27699 1321
THIS CONSERVATION EASEMENT DEED, made this 13th day of April
2005 by Baptist Children s Homes of North Carolina, a North Carolina corporation
( Grantor ) to the State of North Carolina ( Grantee ) whose mailing address is State
of North Carolina, Department of Administration State Property Office 1321 Mail
Service Center Raleigh NC 27699 1321 The designations Grantor and Grantee as used
herein shall include said parties their heirs successors and assigns and shall include
singular plural masculine feminine or neuter as required by context
WITNESSETH
WHEREAS, pursuant to the provisions of N C Gen Stat § 143 214 8 et sea ,
the State of North Carolina has established the Ecosystem Enhancement Program
(formerly known as the Wetlands Restoration Program) within the Department of
Environment and Natural Resources for the purposes of acquiring maintaining restoring
enhancing creating and preserving wetland and riparian resources that contribute to the
protection and improvement of water quality flood prevention fisheries aquatic habitat
wildlife habitat and recreational opportunities and
WHEREAS The State of North Carolina is qualified to be the Grantee of a
Conservation Easement pursuant to N C Gen Stat § 121 35 and
WHEREAS, the Ecosystem Enhancement Program in the Department of
Environment and Natural Resources has approved acceptance of this instrument and
WHEREAS, the Department of Environment and Natural Resources the North
Carolina Department of Transportation and the United States Army Corps of Engineers

BK 1427PGO28 I
MARGARET SEYt OUR
RELE:NQ1� C00 �E05
ij
05 MAY 31 PM 3 19
�
01) � 1®
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
CONSERVATION EASEMENT
LENOIR COUNTY
SPO File Number 54-k
Prepared by Office of the Attorne} General
Property Control Section
Return to Blane Rice State Property Office
1321 Mail Service Center
Raleigh NC 27699 1321
THIS CONSERVATION EASEMENT DEED, made this 13th day of April
2005 by Baptist Children s Homes of North Carolina, a North Carolina corporation
( Grantor ) to the State of North Carolina, ( Grantee ) whose mailing address is State
of North Carolina, Department of Administration State Property Office 1321 Mail
Service Center Raleigh NC 27699 1321 The designations Grantor and Grantee as used
herein shall include said parties their heirs successors and assigns and shall include
singular plural masculine femimne or neuter as required by context
WITNESSETH
WHEREAS, pursuant to the provisions of N C Gen Stat § 143 214 8 et seg ,
the State of North Carolina has established the Ecosystem Enhancement Program
(formerly known as the Wetlands Restoration Program) within the Department of
Environment and Natural Resources for the purposes of acquiring maintaining restoring
enhancing creating and preserving wetland and riparian resources that contribute to the
protection and improvement of water quality flood prevention fisheries aquatic habitat
wildlife habitat and recreational opportunities and
WHEREAS The State of North Carolina is qualified to be the Grantee of a
Conservation Easement pursuant to N C Gen Stat § 121 35 and
WHEREAS, the Ecosystem Enhancement Program in the Department of
Environment and Natural Resources has approved acceptance of this instrument and
WHEREAS, the Department of Environment and Natural Resources the North
Carolina Department of Transportation and the United States Army Corps of Engineers

OR1427PG0''`2
Wilmington District entered into a Memorandum of Agreement (MOA) duly executed
by all parties in Greensboro NC on July 22 2003 This MOA recognizes that the
Ecosystem Enhancement Program is to provide for compensatory rrutigation by effective
protection of the land water and natural resources of the State by restoring enhancing
and preserving ecosystem functions and
WHEREAS, the acceptance of this instrument for and on behalf of the State of
North Carolina was granted to the Department of Administration by resolution as
approved by the Governor and Council of State adopted at a meeting held in the City of
Raleigh North Carolina on the 8h day of February 2000 and
WHEREAS, Grantor owns in fee simple certain real property situated lying and
being in Falling Creek Township Lenoir County North Carolina (the "Property ") and
being more particularly described as that certain parcel of land containing approximately
1366 59 acres and being conveyed to the Grantor by deed as recorded in Deed Book 740
at Page 163 and Deed Book 44 at Page 277 of the Lenoir County Registry North
Carolina and
WHEREAS, Grantor is willing to grant a Conservation Easement over the herein
described areas of the Property thereby restricting and limiting the use of the included
areas of the Property to the terms and conditions and purposes hereinafter set forth and
Grantee is willing to accept such Conservation Easement This Conservation Easement
shall be for the protection and benefit of the waters of Whitelace Creek
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants terms
conditions and restrictions hereinafter set forth Grantor unconditionally and irrevocably
hereby grants and conveys unto Grantee its successors and assigns, forever and in
perpetuity a Conservation Easement of the nature and character and to the extent
hereinafter set forth over a described area of the Property referred to hereafter as the
Easement Area for the benefit of the people of North Carolina and being all of the
tract of land as identified as 7 97 acres and 27 84 acres as shown on a plat of survey
entitled Conservation Easement along Whitelace Creek for the N C Ecosystem
Enhancement Program on the Property of the Baptist Children s Home dated February
22 2005 certified by Patrick W Hartman PLS L 4262 and recorded in Map Book 10,
Pages 9 and 10, Lenoir County Registry The tract being more particularly described in
Exhibit A
The purposes of this Conservation Easement are to maintain restore enhance
create and preserve wetland and/or riparian resources in the Easement Area that
contribute to the protection and improvement of water quality flood prevention fisheries
aquatic habitat wildlife habitat and recreational opportunities to maintain permanently
the Easement Area in its natural condition consistent with these purposes and to prevent
any use of the Easement Area that will significantly impair or interfere with these
purposes To achieve these purposes the following conditions and restrictions are set
forth
2

8K 1427PGO2 -3
I DURATION OF EASEMENT
This Conservation Easement shall be perpetual It is an easement in gross runs
with the land and is enforceable by Grantee against Grantor their personal
representatives heirs, successors and assigns lessees agents and licensees
II GRANTOR RESERVED USES AND RESTRICTED ACTIVITES
The Easement Area shall be restricted from any development or usage that would
impair or interfere with the purposes of this Conservation Easement Unless expressly
reserved as a compatible use herein any activity in or use of the Easement Area by the
Grantor is prohibited as inconsistent with the purposes of this Conservation Easement
Any rights not expressly reserved hereunder by the Grantor have been acquired by the
Grantee The following specific uses are prohibited restricted or reserved as indicated
A Recreational Uses Grantor expressly reserves the right to undeveloped
recreational uses including hiking bird watching hunting and fishing and
access to the Easement Area for the purposes thereof Usage of motorized
vehicles in the Easement Area is prohibited except as they are used
exclusively for management maintenance or stewardship purposes and on
existing trails paths or roads
B Educational Uses The Grantor reserves the right to engage in and permit
others to engage in educational uses in the Easement Area not inconsistent
with this Conservation Easement and the right of access to the Easement Area
for such purposes including organized educational activities such as site visits
and observations Educational uses of the property shall not alter vegetation
hydrology or topography of the site
C Vegetative Cutting Except as related to the removal of non native plants
diseased or damaged trees and vegetation that obstructs destabilizes or
renders unsafe the Easement Area to persons or natural habitat all cutting
removal mowing harming or destruction of any trees and vegetation in the
Easement Area is prohibited
D Industrial, Residential and Commercial Uses All are prohibited in the
Easement Area
E Agricultural Use All agricultural uses within the Easement Area including
any use for cropland waste lagoons or pastureland are prohibited
F New Construction There shall be no building facility mobile home
antenna, utility pole tower or other structure constructed or placed in the
Easement Area
3

B11(1427PG028°
G Roads and Trails There shall be no construction of roads trails walkways
or paving in the Easement Area Existing roads or trails located in the
Easement Area may be maintained by Grantor in order to minimize runoff
sedimentation and for access to the interior of the Property for management
maintenance stewardship purposes or undeveloped recreational and
educational uses of the Easement Area Existing roads trails or paths may be
maintained with loose gravel or permanent vegetation to stabilize or cover the
surfaces
H Signs No signs shall be permitted in the Easement Area except interpretive
signs describing restoration activities and the conservation values of the
Easement Area, signs identifying the owner of the Property and the holder of
the Conservation Easement signs giving directions or signs prescribing rules
and regulations for the use of the Easement Area may be allowed
I Dumping or Storing Dumping or storage of soil trash ashes garbage
waste abandoned vehicles appliances or machinery or other material in the
Easement Area is prohibited
J Grading, Mineral Use, Excavation, Dredging There shall be no grading
filling excavation dredging mining or drilling, no removal of topsoil sand
gravel rock peat minerals or other materials
K Water Quality and Drainage Patterns There shall be no diking draining
dredging channeling filling leveling pumping impounding or diverting
causing allowing or permitting the diversion of surface or underground water
No altering or tampering with water control structures or devices or
disruption or alteration of the restored enhanced or created drainage patterns
All removal of wetlands polluting or discharging into waters spnngs seeps
or wetlands or use of pesticide or biocides is prohibited In the event of an
emergency interruption or shortage of all other water sources water from
within the Easement Area may temporarily be used for good cause shown as
needed for the survival of livestock and agricultural production
L Subdivision and Conveyance No further subdivision partitioning or
dividing of the Easement Area is allowed Unless agreed to by the Grantee in
writing any future conveyance of the Easement Area and the rights as
conveyed herein shall be as a single block of property Any future conveyance
of the remaining fee simple rights shall be subject to this Conservation
Easement Grantor agrees for itself its successors and assigns that in the
event it transfers the Property or any portion thereof such transfer is subject
to the Grantees right of ingress egress, and regress over and across the
Property to the Easement Area for the purposes set forth herein
M Development Rights All development rights are removed from the
Easement Area and shall not be transferred
4

ON' 1427PG028r
N Disturbance of Natural Features Any change disturbance alteration or
impairment of the natural features of the Easement Area or any intentional
introduction of non native plants trees and/or animal species by Grantor is
prohibited
The Grantor may request permission to vary from the above restrictions for good
cause shown provided that any such request is consistent with the purposes of this
Conservation Easement The Grantor shall not vary from the above restrictions without
first obtaining written approval from the N C Ecosystem Enhancement Program whose
mailing address is 1652 Mail Servii es Center Raleigh NC 27699 1652
III GRANTEE RESERVED USES
A Ingress, Egress, Regress and Inspection The Grantee its employees
and agents successors and assigns receive the perpetual right of general ingress egress
and regress to the Easement Area over the Property at reasonable times to undertake any
activities to restore manage maintain enhance and monitor the wetland and riparian
resources of the Easement Area, in accordance with restoration activities or a long term
management plan Unless otherwise specifically set forth in this Conservation Easement
the rights granted herein do not include or establish for the public any access rights
B Restoration Activities These activities include planting of trees shrubs
and herbaceous vegetation installation of monitoring wells utilization of heavy
equipment to grade fill and prepare the soil modification of the hydrology of the site
and installation of natural and manmade materials as needed to direct in stream above
ground and subterraneous water flow
IV ENFORCEMENT AND REMEDIES
A Enforcement To accomplish the purposes of this Conservation
Easement Grantee is allowed to prevent any activity within the
Easement Area that is inconsistent with the purposes of this
Easement and to require the restoration of such areas or features of
the Easement Area that may have been damaged by such activity
or use Upon any breach of the terms of this Conservation
Easement by Grantor their successors or assigns that comes to the
attention of the Grantee the Grantee shall except as provided
below notify the Grantor their successors or assigns in writing of
such breach The Grantor shall have ninety (90) days after receipt
of such notice to correct the conditions constituting such breach If
the breach remains uncured after ninety (90) days the Grantee may
enforce this Conservation Easement by appropriate legal
proceedings including damages injunctive and other relief The
Grantee shall also have the power and authority consistent with its
statutory authority (a) to prevent any impairment of the Easement

OK1427PG02''
Area by acts which may be unlawful or in violation of this
Conservation Easement (b) to otherwise preserve or protect its
interest in the Property or (c) to seek damages from any
appropriate person or entity Notwithstanding the foregoing the
Grantee reserves the immediate right without notice to obtain a
temporary restraining order injunctive or other appropriate relief if
the breach of the term of this Conservation Easement is or would
irreversibly or otherwise materially impair the benefits to be
derived from this Conservation Easement The Grantor and
Grantee acknowledge that under such circumstances damage to the
Grantee would be irreparable and remedies at law will be
inadequate The rights and remedies of the Grantee provided
hereunder shall be in addition to and not in lieu of all other rights
and remedies available to Grantee in connection with this
Conservation Easement
B Inspection The Grantee its employees and agents successors
and assigns have the nght with reasonable notice to enter the
Easement Area over the Property at reasonable times for the
purpose of inspection to determine whether the Grantor their
successors or assigns are complying with the terms conditions and
restrictions of this Conservation Easement
C Acts Beyond Grantor's Control Nothing contained in this
Conservation Easement shall be construed to entitle Grantee to
bring any action against Grantor their successors or assigns for
any injury or change in the Easement Area caused by third parties
resulting from causes beyond the Grantors control including
without limitation fire flood storm and earth movement or from
any prudent action taken in good faith by the Grantor under
emergency conditions to prevent abate or mitigate significant
injury to life damage to property or harm to the Property resulting
from such causes
D Costs of Enforcement Beyond regular and typical monitoring
any costs incurred by Grantee in enforcing the terms of this
Conservation Easement against Grantor their successors or
assigns including without limitation any costs of restoration
necessitated by Grantors acts or omissions in violation of the
terms of this Conservation Easement shall be borne by Grantor
E No Waiver Enforcement of this Easement shall be at the
discretion of the Grantee and any forbearance delay or omission
by Grantee to exercise its rights hereunder in the event of any
breach of any term set forth herein shall not be construed to be a
waiver by Grantee
I!.

II427PGO287
V MISCELLANEOUS
A This instrument sets forth the entire agreement of the parties with
respect to the Conservation Easement and supersedes all prior
discussions negotiations understandings or agreements relating to
the Conservation Easement If any provision is found to be
invalid the remainder of the provisions of the Conservation
Easement and the application of such provision to persons or
circumstances other than those as to which it is found to be invalid
shall not be affected thereby
B Any notices shall be sent by registered or certified mail return
receipt requested to the parties at their addresses shown above or to
other address(es) as either party establishes in writing upon
notification to the other
C Grantor shall notify Grantee in writing of the name and address
and any party to whom the Property or any part thereof is to be
transferred at or prior to the time said transfer is made Grantor
further agrees to make any subsequent lease deed or other legal
instrument by which any interest in the Property is conveyed
subject to the Conservation Easement herein created
D The Grantor and Grantee agree that the terms of this Conservation
Easement shall survive any merger of the fee and easement
interests in the Property or any portion thereof
E This Conservation Easement may be amended but only in a
writing signed by all parties hereto and provided such amendment
does not affect the qualification of this Conservation Easement or
the status of the Grantee under any applicable laws and is
consistent with the purposes of the Conservation Easement
F Thy. parties recognize and agree that the benefits of this
Conservation Easement are in gross and assignable provided
however that the Grantee hereby covenants and agrees that to the
event it transfers or assigns this Conservation Easement the
organization receiving the interest will be a qualified holder under
N C Gen Stat § 121 34 et seq and § 170(h) of the Internal
Revenue Code and the Grantee further covenants and agrees that
the terms of the transfer or assignment will be such that the
transferee or assignee will be required to continue in perpetuity the
conservation purposes described in this document
7

�tI427PG0288
VI QUIET ENJOYMENT
Grantor reserves all remaining rights accruing from ownership of the Property
including the right to engage in or permit or invite others to engage in only those uses of
the Easement Area that are expressly reserved herein not prohibited or restricted herein
and are not inconsistent with the purposes of this Conservation Easement Without
limiting the generality of the foregoing the Grantor expressly reserves to the Grantor
and the Grantor's invitees and licensees the right of access to the Easement Area and the
right of quiet enjoyment of the Easement Area
TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the said rights and easements perpetually unto the
State of North Carolina for the aforesaid purposes
AND Grantor covenants that Grantor is seized of said premises in fee and has the
right to convey the permanent Conservation Easement herein granted that the same are
free from encumbrances and that Grantor will warrant and defend title to the same against
the claims of all persons whomsoever
IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF the Grantor has hereunto set his hand and seal
the day and year first above written
1�2"�ez ?-IV
ichael C Blackwell
President Baptist Children s Homes of N C Inc
NORTH CAROLINA
COUNTY OF &4�
a notary Public for said County and State certify that
ZU0 Zf ersonally came before me this day and acknowledged
that he is � of hw &af
a corporation and that by authority duly given and as the act of the corporation the

BKI427PGO2 ®9
signed in its name by its ` '.tda.,. -
;al and attested by himself as its �%C•jL('YA4
official seal this the 130" day of 200,6
,�,OTA)q,y `p low
v (Noter�eal)
y,
,,sp e4
If G i
My Commission Expires
r
Notary Public
2dORTH CAROLINA Qertifi ate o G
The foregoing F P of
is cert'f ed to be correot Iq o�elock
F 41 for re- istratl n
this day of R r of Deeds
BY
E

8t 1427PGO29#1
EXHIBIT A
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
7 97 Acres t CONSEVATION EASTMENT
Located on WHITELACE CREEK
NC ECOSYSTEM ENHANCEMENT PROGRAM
ON THE PROPERTY OF
THE BAPTIST CHILDREN S HOME
LENOIR COUNTY, NC
PLAT CABINET 10 FILE 9 10
All that certain easement being located in the County of Lenoir Falling Creek Township
North Carolina on the property of Baptist Children s Home property recorded in Deed
Book 44 page 277 and Deed Book 740 Page 163 and being described by the following
metes and bounds
THE POINT OF BEGINNING BEING located S 30° 56 02 E 6297 93 feet from N C
G S Monument Farm Grid Coordinates (SPC 83) of Nortlung 552 052 315 US feet and
Easting 2 388 2113 10 US feet thence from said point of beginning S 07° 10 -30 E
9 40 feet to a point thence S 09° 39 11 E 79 04 feet to a point thence S 02° 530 58 E
68 06 feet to a point thence S 06° 06 -47 E 64 79 feet to a point thence S 100 54 25 E
5131 feet to a point thence N 72° 02' 11 'W 77191 feet to a point thence N 63° 18
26 W 510 65 feet to a point thence N 850 47 05 W 24122 feet to a point thence S
80 ° -07 29 W 719 81 feet to a point thence N 160 12 45 W 74 84 feet to a point
thence N 59° 03 02 E 34 55 feet to a point thence S 77 141 39 E 40 05 feet to a
point thence N 86° 16 -41 E 52 01 feet to a point thence N 61° 12 16 E 38 84 feet to
a point, thence N 79° 00 -15 E 9197 feet to a point thence S 810 57 51 E 75 76 feet
to a point thence N 55° 19 05 E 39 22 feet to a point thence N 780 49 02 E 314 72
feet to a point thence N 810 59 07 E 200 01 feet to a point thence N 120 30 56 W
70 58 feet to a point thence S 890 58 03 E 202 02 feet to a point thence S 63° 41 01
E 519 19 feet to a point thence S 73° 25 03 E 578 38 feet to a point thence N 77° 40
25 E 62 59 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING containing 7 97 acres f and being
shown on an Easement Survey Conservation Easement Along Whitelace Creek for the
N C Ecosystem Enhancement Program on the Property of the Baptist Children s Home
Prepared by Rivers & Associates Inc dated February 23 2005 and recorded in the
Lenoir County Registry Plat Cabinet 10 File 9 and 10

I421PG02P'
EXHIBIT A (continued)
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
27 84 Acres t CONSERVATION EASEMENT
LOCATED ON WHITELACE CREEK
NC ECOSYSTEM ENHANCEMENT PROGRAM
ON THE PROPERTY OF
THE BAPTIST CHILDREN S HOME
LENOIR COUNTY NC
PLAT CABINET 10 FILE 9 10
All that certain easement being located in the County of Lenoir Falling Creek Township
North Carolina on the property of Baptist Children s Home property recorded in Deed
Book 44 page 277 and Deed Book 740 Page 163 and being described by the following
metes and bounds
THE POINT OF BEGINNING BEING located S 23° 39 21 E 329 81 feet from an
existing iron pipe North Carolina Sate Plane Grid Coordinates (SPC83) of Northing
546 949 876 US feet and Eastmg 2 393 426 554 US feet thence from said point of
beginning S 03° 39' 57 W 328 91 feet to a point thence S 16° 30 38" W 292 22 feet to
a point thence S 47° 40' 31" W 136 42 feet to a point thence S 26" 51' 00" W 129 10
feet to a point thence S 19 ° -53 -02' W 369 43 feet to a point thence S 16° 13 -01 E
1 l 2 08 feet to a point thence N 87 °42' 19 W 369 70 feet to a point thence N 09° 58'
53 ' E 354 13 feet to a point thence N 27-49' 48' E 658 45 feet to a point thence N 42°
53' 59 E 17140 feet to a point thence N 33° 38' -20" W 133 20 feet to a point thence S
580 33 51" W 254 22 feet to a point thence N 86° 50 19" W 715 82 feet to a point
thence S 39° 35' 08 W 174 57 feet to a point thence N 88° 05' 53 W 363 96 feet to a
point thence N 62° 42 22 W 115 09 feet to a point thence S 820 11 30 W 213 83 feet
to a point thence N 72° 02 11 W 7 79 feet to a point thence N 12° 25 48 W 7 01 feet
to a point, thence N 100 54 25 W 59 69 feet to a point thence N 06° 06'47 W 62 69
feet to a point thence N 020 53 58 W 68 99 feet to a point thence N 09° 39 11 W
80 16 feet to a point thence N 07° 10 30" W 1145 feet to a point thence N 77° 40' 25"
E 1603 70 feet to a point thence S 550 38 21 'E 623 40 feet to the POINT OF
BEGINNING containing 27 84 acres f and being shown on an Easement Survey
Conservation Easement Along Whttelace Creek for the N C Ecosystem Enhancement
Program on the Property of the Baptist Children s Home Prepared by Rivers &
Associates Inc dated February 23 2005 and recorded in the Lenoir County Registry
Plat Cabinet 10 File 9 and 10

� s
.fir aG fay. s t:
p:K J7'Pt r ,.
rta r
�l
�! 1.sflF iota:

Monitoring Firm
Stantec
Stantec Consulting Services Inc
801 Jones Franklin Road Suite 300
Raleigh NC 27606

Table of Contents
10 Executive Summary
1
20 Methodology
3
21 Vegetation Assessment
3
22 Stream Assessment
3
23 Wetland Assessment
3
30 References
4
Project Condition and Monitoring Data Appendices
5
Appendix A General Figures and Plan Views
5
Appendix B General Project Tables
11
Appendix C Vegetation Assessment Data
15
Appendix D Stream Assessment Data
25
Appendix E Wetland Assessment
27
Protect Condition and Monitoring Data Appendices
Appendix A General Figures and Plan Views
Figure 1 — Location Map
Figure 2 — Consolidated Current Condition Plan View
Appendix B General Project Tables
Table 1 — Project Restoration Components 11
Table 2 — Project History and Reporting Activity 11
Table 3 — Project Contacts Table 12
Table 4 — Project Background Table 13
Appendix C Vegetation Assessment Data
Table 5 — Vegetation Plot Mitigation Success Summary Table 15
Photos — Vegetation Monitoring Plot Photos 16
Table 6 — Vegetation Metadata Table 21
Table 7 — Stem Count Total and Planted by Plot and Species 23
Vegetation Problem Area Photos (electronic submission only)
Vegetation Problem Area Inventory Table (electronic submission only)
Appendix D Stream Assessment Data
Photos — Stream Station Photos 25
Appendix E Wetland Assessment Data
Figures — Water Level and Precipitation Plots 27
Table 10 — Wetland Hydrology Criteria Attainment 37
Whitelace Stream Enhancement and Wetland Restoration Project Page i
Stantec — Monitoring Year 6 of 6 — Final November 2011

(This page intentionally left blank)

10 Executive Summary
The North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program (EEP) enhanced 5 182 linear feet of the Whitelace
Creek stream channel located west of Kinston in Lenoir County North Carolina Additionally 2 77 and
8 01 acres of wetland area were enhanced and preserved respectively Also 12 99 acres (565 734 square
feet) of riparian buffer were restored The site construction was completed in August of 2005 and
planting occurred in March of 2006 This report provides the monitoring information for year six (6) of
the stream enhancement and wetland restoration project
Previous dredging and straightening of Whitelace Creek had lowered the streambed elevation thereby
causing a reduction in the acreage of riverine wetlands due to a lowered water table Restoration and
enhancement objectives for this project included the restoration of historic stream and wetland functions
that existed on site prior to dredging and vegetation removal Site alterations at Whitelace Creek included
the excavation or re establishment of the floodplain and in situ stream channel modification to the
existing stream The goals of these activities are as follows
• to introduce surface water flood hydrodynamics from a 10 1 square mile watershed along the
restored length of stream and floodplain
• to restore wetland hydrology
• to reforest the site with streamside and riparian forest communities
The Year 6 vegetative monitoring was performed on October 5 2011 using the Carolina Vegetation
Survey Level 2 methodology on 9 of the original 15 plots as requested by NCEEP Refer to Table 7 and
the Current Condition Plan View (CCPV) Map in the appendices for the vegetation results Monitoring
revealed that only 2 of the 9 plots (22 %) met the 5 year vegetative success criteria of 260 planted stems or
greater per acre for streams and wetlands When volunteer stems are included all of the vegetation plots
meet or exceed the required density of 260 stems or greater per acre with the average vegetation density
across the site being 2 788 stems per acre (planted and volunteer) Located within the Neuse River Basin
this project was instituted prior to October 11 2007 and is therefore eligible for riparian buffer restoration
credit up to 200 feet from the top of bank of all perennial and intermittent waterways within the
conservation easement As such applicable vegetation plots have been assessed for the vegetation success
criteria for buffers (320 planted trees or greater per acre) Vegetation Plots 4 and 6 lie within the riparian
buffer restoration areas of the project site (refer to the CCPV Map) Only Vegetation Plot 4 is currently
meeting the vegetation success criteria of 320 planted trees or greater per acre When volunteer trees are
also included both Vegetation Plot 4 and Vegetation Plot 6 meet or exceed the required density of 320
trees or greater per acre
Many factors have contributed to the loss of planted species and include drought (2007) direct beaver
damage and excessive flooding due to beaver activity Mowing has occurred along both sides of the main
farm road in the area around the bridge As of the monitoring visit beavers had not rebuilt any dams in
the project area and there are no signs of new beaver activity However previous beaver activity
Whitelace Stream Enhancement and Wetland Restoration Project Page I
Stantec —Monitoring Year 6 of 6 —Final November 2011

flooding and deer browsing affected many of the planted trees in vegetation plots It should be noted that
vigorous woody volunteer recruitment (especially Betula nigra) is present in the upper section of the
reach near Vegetation Plots 1 and 2
Other problems continue to include the presence of invasive or exotic species such as Typha lattfoha and
Lespedeza cuneata Existing areas of Typha are located in small pockets along the middle to lower end of
the project with the densest areas at the downstream end of the site Currently Typha does not appear to be
negatively impacting the planted woody vegetation Lespedeza is present along the drier slopes near
Vegetation Plots 1 and 2 and does not appear to be spreading into the floodplam Murdannia keisak
observed in past years was not observed in significant amounts in MY6
As in previous years a general assessment of stream stability was conducted Results were the same as in
the past in that the stream is stable and is well connected to the floodplam Stream channels bars are still
present which could lead to lateral migration and bank instability however migration and instability were
not observed during current monitoring
Groundwater data collected through October of 2011 was used to assess the compliance of the site with
wetland hydrology criteria Seven groundwater monitoring gauges are currently active on the project site
A site is considered to meet the requirements for wetland hydrology if the groundwater level is within 12
inches of the ground surface for 12 5% of the growing season consecutively All 7 of the gauges met the
criteria during the growing season of 2011 Three reference gauges are also currently active All three of
the reference gauges met the success criteria in 2011
Summary information/data related to the occurrence of items such as beaver or encroachment and
statistics related to performance of various project and monitoring elements can be found in the tables and
figures in the report appendices Narrative background and supporting information formerly found in
these reports can be found in the mitigation and restoration plan documents available on EEP s webs►te
All raw data supporting the tables and figures in the appendices is available from EEP upon request
Whitelace Stream Enhancement and Wetland Restoration Project Page 2
Stantec — Monitoring Year 6 of 6 —Final November 2011

2 0 Methodology
21 VEGETATION ASSESSMENT
Fifteen vegetative sample plots were quantitatively monitored during the first growing season Species
composition density and survival were monitored during Year 0 and Year 1 The number of plots was
reduced to nine for monitoring in the second year as requested by NCEEP These plots include the
original plots named VP1 VP2 VP4 VP6 VP8 VP9 VP11 VP14 and VP15 The Carolina Vegetation
Survey (CVS) methodology Version 2 2 7 was utilized for vegetative monitoring in Years 2 3 4 5 and 6
Level 2 (planted and natural stems) methodology was completed on all monitored plots
The vegetative success criteria are based on the US Army Corps of Engineers Stream Mitigation
Guidelines (USACE 2003) In the stream and wetland restoration areas the final vegetative success
criteria are the survival of 260 5 year old planted woody stems per acre at the end of the Year 5
monitoring period An interim measure of vegetation planting success was the survival of at least 320 3
year old planted woody stems per acre at the end of year 3 of the monitoring period A ten percent
mortality rate was accepted in year four (288 stems /acre) and another ten percent in year five resulting in
a required survival rate of 260 trees /acre through year five Located within the Neuse River Basin this
project was instituted prior to October 11 2007 and is therefore eligible for riparian buffer restoration
credit up to 200 feet from the top of bank of all perennial and intermittent waterways within the
conservation easement The vegetative success criteria for the riparian buffer restoration areas is 320
planted trees per acre at the end of Monitoring Year 5
The Year 6 stem counts within each of the nine vegetative monitoring plots are included in Exhibit Table
7 in Appendix C Photos of the vegetative monitoring plots are also included in Appendix C
22 STREAM ASSESSMENT
Changes in stream profile and pattern were not included in the stream enhancement project for Whitelace
Creek As such cross section and longitudinal profile surveys and pebble counts were not performed for
the Year 6 monitoring as directed by NCEEP However a general assessment of stream stability and
problem areas was performed during field reconnaissance
23 WETLAND ASSESSMENT
A site is considered to meet the requirements for wetland hydrology if the groundwater saturation is
within 12 inches of the ground surface consecutively for 12 5% of the growing season (30 Days) The
growing season in this area is from March 18'' to November 8`h for a total of 234 days (MRCS 2002)
Seven groundwater monitoring gauges are currently active on the project site Data from these gauges
were collected and analyzed to assess their success Three reference gauges are located northwest of the
project site Reference gauges 1 & 2 are located near the intersection of Sutton Road with Moseley Creek
Reference gauge 3 is located between Hillcrest Road and Moseley Creek approximately 5 500 feet north
of Route 70 Please refer to the project Vicinity Map (Figure 1) in Appendix A for locations of the
reference groundwater monitoring gauges Graphs of precipitation and water level plots are included in
Appendix E
Whitelace Stream Enhancement and Wetland Restoration Project Page 3
Stantec — Monitoring Year 6 of 6 —Final November 2011

30 References
Lee Michael T R K Peet S D Roberts and T R Wentworth 2008 CVS EEP Protocol for Recording
Vegetation Version 4 2 (http / /cvs bio unc edu/methods htm)
NC CRONOS 2011 NC CRONOS Database — Cunningham Research Station (KINS) North Carolina
State University State Climate Office of North Carolina http / /www nc climate ncsu edu/cronos
NCEEP 2009 Revised Table of Contents for 2009 Monitoring Report Submissions North Carolina
Department of Environment and Natural Resources Ecosystem Enhancement Program Raleigh NC
Version 12 1 June 1 2009
NRCS 2002 WETS Table for Lenoir County NC Natural Resource Conservation Service National
Water and Climate Center
USACE EPA NCWRC NCDWQ 2003 Stream Mitigation Guidelines
Weakley Alan S 2007 Flora of the Carolinas Virginia Georgia and surrounding areas University of
North Carolina Herbarium Chapel Hill NC Working draft as of January 11 2007
Whitelace Stream Enhancement and Wetland Restoration Project Page 4
Stantec — Monitoring Year 6 of 6 —Final November 2011

Project Condition and Monitoring Data Appendices
APPENDIX A GENERAL FIGURES AND PLAN VIEWS
Whitelace Stream Enhancement and Wetland Restoration Project Page 5
Stantec — Monitoring Year 6 of 6 —Final November 2011

This page left Intentionally blank for double sided printing
Whnelace Stream Enhancement and Wetland Restoration Project Page 6
Stantec — Monitoring Year 6 of 6 —Final November 2011

wh = c m
o
r. i0 a S a m
IIr i'
/ i1
"ZrVf
I -.I �ri_le ��` CL O ��
CU LLI
C c°"
co
� w I z 3 -- /'I ✓`�`j.} I ', d °a, a Imo. -
e
.o
vT
f
t� P2,
I � s sMueO �F�
lS, .J If
vv
9
w � I ? h4pebua� w
Co
m LL.I
u
�
q � 0
N p
sm;i`j
Elk
k��YY 'ems
��.[yJ�- y�§•t{ti,!`.. �„1 e�_ � d � T/e( -. -_ � I o °'= � Em rno
pc£vEw °U
j� J • q% q o oo u d L:
a 3 0 ^'
u
../ f y EvUcy TKCU«p
-'- fir .'� — — �. —• �.. 11. _ »....n —__ -_ I vl � � a t ` A v «
y w p w p c v

c
C
a
d
�o
v
'o
v
�°_
Y
A
a
m
a
F
d
z
i
e
a
oG
5
3°
�'
��
�2�
Ul C
o
s 0
8�i
3�

%
\ O \
/ «\
/\4
\ �¥
4�§
!r;!!r!!■
- ■ ■m
!¥mmmKmmmm(m§m9¥
.;§n,■,;.�
§
|22
■§,|
■;2;�!!!§
;r-
|)§
!§:
%|
»
&!
\
■
\2;;;;\\
e - Ul o�
}
0 z\ 5
k /§ {E
0 >
o
§b2z
1\-
@ §_(
+)5�
d %]
§
§ §k■
$f
LL.
[
E
)
!
!r;!!r!!■
- ■ ■m
!¥mmmKmmmm(m§m9¥
§,
§
|22
■§,|
■;2;�!!!§
;r-
|)§
!§:
%|
»
&!
\
■
\2;;;;\\
e - Ul o�
}
0 z\ 5
k /§ {E
0 >
o
§! ! k
"2 |
LL' )
\ �
f«°
�E#�\ f
\\ \ \\ \ �
§)k\\ ^ /
{ -� &
w w
�2� «)j( \§
))J&m!z£!f$
o
§
E
ƒ §
»
22bk
e - Ul o�
0 z\ 5
k /§ {E
0 >
o
§b2z
1\-
@ §_(
CD
d %]
)
C-4
@ $
&
LL.
[
§! ! k
"2 |
LL' )
\ �
f«°
�E#�\ f
\\ \ \\ \ �
§)k\\ ^ /
{ -� &
w w
�2� «)j( \§
))J&m!z£!f$
o

c
c
a
v
v
u
0
a
w
Y
A
L
d
A
a
s
F
o_-
u N
a�
0
z
d
z
S
3=
f�
W
�y

APPENDIX B GENERAL PROJECT TABLES
Table 1 Project Restoration Components
Whitelace Creek Wetland Restoration Site/EEP Pro ect No 420
El
iv
E2
s
`o
Wetland Enhancement
P =
Preservation
NA
NA
Nov 2004
Construction
Aug 2005
NA
Reach ID
F j 14
NA
°
�° "
Stationing
Comment
NA
Aug 2005
Bare Root Seedling Installation
Mar 2006
NA
Mar 2005
Total accounts for 30 1 f
NA
NA
Apr 2005
Final Report
NA
NA
gap in easement at road
Reach 1
3 293
1 El
P2
1 3 293
7 +84 40 +77
crossing
Reach 2
1 889
E2
SS
1 889
40 +77 59 +66
Nov 2009
Riverme Wetland
Nov 2009
Year 5 Monitoring
Nov 2010
Nov 2010
Nov 2010
Year 6 Monitoring
Enhancement
Nov 2011
E
NA
2 77 ac
NA
Riverme Wetland
Preservation
P
NA
8 01 ac
NA
Neuse River Buffer
Restoration
R
I NA
1 12 99 ac
NA
R =
Restoration
El
= Stream Enhancement l
E2
= Stream Enhancement 2
E =
Wetland Enhancement
P =
Preservation
P2 = Priority 2
SS = Streambank Stabilization
Table 2 Project Activity and Reporting History
Whitelace Creek Wetland Restoration Site/EEP Pro ect No 420
Activity or Report
Scheduled
Completion
Data
Collection
Complete
Actual Completion
or Delivery
Restoration Plan
NA
NA
Feb 2004
Final Design 90%
NA
NA
Nov 2004
Construction
Aug 2005
NA
Aug 2005
Temporary S &E mix applied to entire project area
NA
NA
Jul 2005
Permanent seed mix applied to entire project area
NA
NA
Aug 2005
Bare Root Seedling Installation
Mar 2006
NA
Mar 2005
Mitigation Plan / As built Year 0 Monitoring baseline
NA
NA
Apr 2005
Final Report
NA
NA
Apr 2005
Year 1 Monitoring
Nov 2006
Nov 2006
Nov 2006
Year 2 Monitoring
Nov 2007
Nov 2007
Dec 2007
Year 3 Monitoring
Nov 2008
Nov 2008
Nov 2008
Year 4 Monitoring
Nov 2009
Nov 2009
Nov 2009
Year 5 Monitoring
Nov 2010
Nov 2010
Nov 2010
Year 6 Monitoring
Nov 2011
Nov 2011
Nov 2011
NA =Not Applicable
Whitelace Stream Enhancement and Wetland Restoration Project Page 1 I
Stantec — Monitoring Year 6 of 6 —Final November 2011

Table 3 Project Contacts
Whitelace Creek Wetland Restoration Site/EEP Project No 420
Designer
EcoScience Corporation
1101 Haynes Street
Suite 101
Ralei h NC 27604
Construction Contractor
Shamrock Environmental Corporation
PO Box 14987
Greensboro NC 27415
Planting Contractor
Emerald Forest Incorporated
4651 Backwoods Road
Chesapeake VA 23322 2456
Seeding Contractor
Wheat Swamp Landscaping
4675 Ben Dail Road
LaGrange NC 28551 8038
Seed Mix Sources
IKEX Inc
PO Box 250
Middlesex, NC 27557
Nursery Stock Suppliers
Warren County Nursery
6492 Beersheba Highway
McMinnville TN 37110
Pinelands Nursery and Supply
323 Island Road
Columbus NJ 08022
Coastal Plain Conservation Nursery
3067 Connors Drive
Edenton NC 27932
Monitoring Performers (Year 0 1)
EcoScience Corporation
1101 Haynes Street Suite 101
Raleigh NC 27604
919 828 3433
Monitoring Performers (Year 2-6)
Stantec Consulting Services Inc
801 Jones Franklin Road Ste 300
Raleigh NC 27606
Stream Monitoring POC
David Bidelspach [phone]
Vegetation Monitoring POC
Amber Coleman [phone]
Wetland Monitoring POC
Amber Coleman 919 851 6866
Whitelace Stream Enhancement and Wetland Restoration Project Page 12
Stantec — Monitoring Year 6 of 6 —Final November 2011

Table 4 Protect Attribute Table
Whitelace Creek Wetland Restoration Site /EEP Project No 420
Project County
Lenoir
Drainage Area
10 1 sq m►
Drama a impervious cover estimate %
< 1 percent
Stream Order
2 d order
Physiographic Region
Coastal Plain
Ecorelzion
Southeastern Flood plains and Low Terraces
Ros en Classification of As built
C/E
Coward►n Classification
R2UB23Cb (Riverine Lower Perennial
Uncosolidated Bottom Sand/Mud Seasonally
Flooded Beaver
Dominant soil types
Riverine Wetland Restoration
Riverine Wetland Enhancement
Johnston stream channels 80% of Site
Johnston stream channels 80% of Site
Reference site ID
O1 05471 O 1 A
USGS HUC for Project
USGS HUC for Reference
03020202040020
03020202040020
NCDWQ Subbasin for Project
03 0405
NCDWQ Subbasm for Reference
03 04 05
NCDWQ Classification for Project
C SW NSW
NCDWQ Classification for Reference
C SW NSW
Any portion of any project segment 303d hsted9
No
Any portion of any project segment upstream of a 303d listed
segment9
No
Reasons for 303d listing or stressor
No
Percent of project easement fenced
No
Whitelace Stream Enhancement and Wetland Restoration Project Page 13
Stantec — Monitoring Year 6 of 6 —Final November 2011

This page left intentionally blank for double sided printing
Whitelace Stream Enhancement and Wetland Restoration Project Page 14
Stantec — Monitoring Year 6 of 6 —Final November 2011

Appendix C. Vegetation Assessment Data
Table 5 - Vegetation Plot Mitigation Success
Summary
Whitelace Creek Wetland Restoration Site /
EEP Project No. 420
Vegetation
Stream/Wetland
Vegetation
Density Met
Buffer
Vegetation
Density Met
Plot ID
(260 planted
stems /acre )
(320 planted
trees /acre
VP 1
N 202
n/a
VP2
N (81)
n/a
VP4
Y 364
Y 364
VP6
N 162
N 162
VP8
N 242
n/a
VP9
Y 283
n/a
VP11
N 40
n/a
VP 14
N 243
n/a
V P 15
N 162
n/a
Tract
Mean
22% (198 planted
stems /acre ) I
50% (263 planted
trees /acre
Whitelace Stream Enhancement and Wetland Restoration Project Page 15
Stantec — Monitoring Year 6 of 6 —Final November 2011

Vegetation Monitoring Plot Photos
Photo Station 1: Vegetation Plot 1 (10/05/11)
Photo Station 2: Vegetation Plot 2 (10/05/11).
Whitelace Stream Enhancement and Wetland Restoration Project Page 16
Stantec — Monitoring Year 6 of 6 —Final November 2011

Photo Station 3: Vegetation Plot 4 (10/05/ 11)
Photo Station 4: Vegetation Plot 6 (10105111)
Whitelace Stream Enhancement and Wetland Restoration Project Page 17
Stantec — Monitoring Year 6 of 6 —Final November 2011

Photo Station 5: Vegetation Plot 8 (10/05/ 11)
Photo Station 6: Vegetation Plot 9 (12/14/2011)
Whitelace Stream Enhancement and Wetland Restoration Project Page 18
Stantec — Monitoring Year 6 of 6 —Final November 2011

Photo Station 7: Vegetation Plot 11 (10105111 )
Photo Station 8: Vegetation Plot 14 (12/14/2011)
Whitelace Stream Enhancement and Wetland Restoration Project Page 19
Stantec — Monitoring Year 6 of 6 —Final November 2011

Photo Station 9: Vegetation Plot 15 (10/05/11)
Whitelace Stream Enhancement and Wetland Restoration Project Page 20
Stantec — Monitoring Year 6 of 6 —Final November 2011

Table 6. Vegetation Metadata
Report Prepared By
Alex Baldwin
Date Prepared
10/7/201110:52
database name
Stantec_Whitelace2011_A.mdb
database location
U: \175613003 \Whitelace \project \site data \cvs
computer name
BALDWINA
file size
28180480
Metadata
Description of database file, the report worksheets, and
a summary of project(s) and project data.
Proj, planted
Each project is listed with its PLANTED stems per acre,
for each year. This excludes live stakes.
Proj, total stems
Each project is listed with its TOTAL stems per acre, for
each year. This includes live stakes, all planted stems,
and all natural /volunteer stems.
Plots
List of plots surveyed with location and summary data
(live stems, dead stems, missing, etc.).
Vigor
Frequency distribution of vigor classes for stems for all
plots.
Vigor by Spp
Frequency distribution of vigor classes listed by species.
Damage
List of most frequent damage classes with number of
occurrences and percent of total stems impacted by
each.
Damage by Spp
Damage values tallied by type for each species.
Damage by Plot
Damage values tallied by type for each plot.
Planted Stems by Plot and Spp
A matrix of the count of PLANTED living stems of each
species for each plot; dead and missing stems are
excluded.
ALL Stems by Plot and spp
A matrix of the count of total living stems of each
species (planted and natural volunteers combined) for
each plot; dead and missing stems are excluded.
PROJECT SUMMARY-------------------------------------
Project Code
420
project Name
Whitelace Creek
Description
Wetland restoration and enhancement
River Basin
N e u se
length(ft)
5900
stream -to -edge width (ft)
100
area (sq m)
80,937
Sampled Plots
9
Whitelace Stream Enhancement and Wetland Restoration Project Page 21
Stantec — Monitoring Year 6 of 6 —Final November 2011

(This page intentionally left blank for two -sided printing)
Whitelace Stream Enhancement and Wetland Restoration Project Page 22
Stantec — Monitoring Year 6 of 6 —Final November 2011

Nil
IN
IN
IOU
pillillilillillillillillillillillillilI
ISO
IS
IIIIIIIIII
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIN11
I
III
�
1111
IOU
Ilni��ii�i���m��ii�
Ilk
IN
����
�■�
�imiYllll�i�i
INM
IIY
III
.
.
. . . . . . . . .
........
.
. . . . . . . . . . .........
.......

a
v
b
3
Y
G
A
Y
T
G
G
C
d
-4
n
s
F

Appendix D. Stream Assessment Data
Photo Station 1 (S1) —Overview of Project (looking downstream from Sta.10 +00 (10105111)
Photo Station 2 (S2) - Overview of upstream portion of reach (looking upstream from Sta.10 +00
(10/05/11)
Whitelace Stream Enhancement and Wetland Restoration Project Page 25
Stantec — Monitoring Year 6 of 6 - Final November 2011

Photo Station 3 (S3) — Looking downstream from bridge (06/15/11)
Photo Station 4 (S4) — Looking upstream from crest gauge (10105111)
Whitelace Stream Enhancement and Wetland Restoration Project Page 26
Stantec — Monitoring Year 6 of 6 - Final November 2011

Appendix E. Wetland Assessment
0
Mo
O O
W
� m
O
tQ O
30
�o
�O
�o
O Z
r �
N j
0
(ui) uopeaidiaaM
� O 00 r CO to 7 M N � O
!L
O�
!L
O1 /` /L
LL
0e,
L
LL
oe /9 /s
!L
OBI&
m
LL0 o
19-
!L
02�s /9
!!
0-
Oe
L!
02/,
/O
LL
L
o LO o to o LO LOS,
C N IC N (�l M V /!
(u!) 4jda(i /L
Whitelace Stream Enhancement and Wetland Restoration Project Page 27
Stantec — Monitoring Year 6 of 6 - Final November 2011

O (ui) uopepdiaWd
.- o) 00 t-_ (0 to M N O
Whitelace Stream Enhancement and Wetland Restoration Project Page 28
Stantec — Monitoring Year 6 of 6 - Final November 2011
4i
O O�
C m o _
W �
C
30 —
11{
°'9 W
Q
O
/ O
3
O� v
/ Z
u
�o
( a
Cu �0C,
—
9i6, v
U- x
W
3
J
W
M
f0 fD
� N
M CD
C
O
9
�(9
m
w
w 3
3a
m
°
0
r o
9/�
c
Cu
Z
U
(C
rf�
V
%
7
!O
.C-
N
E�
9
N d
p
C
(�
O
N
O aa)
rn U)
Oe
U) C Of •-
C
/
lT0
.n c •3 co
M C `O
ca
m C9 0
e
°�'
LI-
�
- -
--� - - --
-�
Ocl
t
a
N -
O
Cr
{0
(n
o U)
o U) o
(n o (n o (n
o`
r
.- N N M M
V /
,
e
(w)
4adaa
Whitelace Stream Enhancement and Wetland Restoration Project Page 28
Stantec — Monitoring Year 6 of 6 - Final November 2011

N
R Q
1) ti
L 00
� N
3�
0
�o
=o
�o
0Z
C7 �
� M
N d
O (u J uoge;tdIoa.id
Q> CU n O LO d' M N O
tt
Oe /O
IF,-
tt
Oel
tt
Oc, /�/O
t
tt
O1- /O /S
tt
Oil
t0� o
tt
tt
0e,
tt
O�
tt
A
/O
tt
t
o o in o LO N o to o in o LO o toe
N N M M /t /t
(u!) y1daa
Whitelace Stream Enhancement and Wetland Restoration Project Page 29
Stantec - Monitoring Year 6 of 6 - Final November 2011

O (ui) uopepdiOWd
O Co n O to V M N O
Whitelace Stream Enhancement and Wetland Restoration Project Page 30
Stantec - Monitoring Year 6 of 6 - Final November 2011
C
I
—�
o
C m°n
W (n
tT
1
i
0, 0
V1
! Ca
m
O
o
Off`/ 0
[[ Z
Ln
Z
[[ u
O,
/,q/ —aai
6
v ._
cc
M to
u x
W
W
[[Q�
Q
0
�- m
+% W
o
Q
O
C
w
\4&
9/l
U
0 to
3
[
[O6/
O
c
s/9
(V d
o
?y
0
C
> °
_
M N
O
[[Q
CT
a/
C_
r-
C C
.C.§ T
00`-
mU0
[[
![02
/A
/F
Q
v
[Oe
v
e
rT
v
tY
!
[Q2/
O O LO O LO 0 LO N N M M c0h
N
(ui) qjdaa
Whitelace Stream Enhancement and Wetland Restoration Project Page 30
Stantec - Monitoring Year 6 of 6 - Final November 2011

ti
*- LL
M W
V
� m
.�. W
t0 0
3°
�o
c°
:3o
oZ
r
N N
.7
0
(ui) uoge;tdioa,Jd
� O W N (O to V M N O
O�
o c �: !O
o
w wo !
W�
+I L
m
!!
OC". /A /G
Oet
!
O�' /9 0
Li
Oc./
S/9
c
0
U) O m !!
>. Mw Oc`
[] c
�c
_
�o�
m C7 0 !L
Oe/
n
L!
(D �
(0 s /F
t N
U) O L
!O
c'/
C7 a�
tr
!
o LO o LO o LO o a7 0 to o to !0
N N N M M /!
/L
(U!) 41dea
Whitelace Stream Enhancement and Wetland Restoration Project
Stantec — Monitoring Year 6 of 6 - Final
Page 31
November 2011

o00
+- N
ate. Q
ca o
O
.a O
= O
� O
O Z
os
r O
N
O (ui) uo{IeIidioOJd
O O fl- c0 fn M N O
------------
7 ----
r c�
0
0
v r°n 00
C7
C m
W 4):7-
N C
N
M
O rn to
c c�
O
M
N
C7
..
`(9
(O
_
v
c
0
C7
N C
N
M
O rn to
c c�
2C,
N
CO O
`(9
v
w
.3
Cr
w
L!
0
82
L!
L!
!
L!
L�
Oe�919
L!
0��9
LL
O�1s/9
L!
0e,
LL
O2.
did
L!
Oel
i0
LL
O��
`'c'
L
!
O fn O to O Ln o Ln o n o Ln o 0
N N N M M /!
(u!) L11dea
Whitelace Stream Enhancement and Wetland Restoration Project
Stantec - Monitoring Year 6 of 6 - Final
Page 32
November 2011

U
10 N
co 00
O 0
� m
ate+ W
3CD
0
ICY CD
C C
:3 O
O Z
0 CO
r ti
N N
J
o (ui) uogepdioaJd
r O 00 h (0 In [P M N r O
t` 0
v
o c�
v
c m 00
Who
-
U
M
o
t` 0
v
v
U
-
C
o
'-
C?
N
a
M
0
C
0)
y
Q
Q M -
m �
c
_c
c 3 CO _
rno r-
m C7 0 --�
v
v
(U
L!
0�
i?
L!
O
!
le
L!
OY
O
lI
0��
9�6
11
O
c�,9�9
r
C,j9�` 0
!!
029
L!
ll
Oe"
l!
Oe,�
l,e
L
o o LO o o U') o LO o U') o l
N N M M 0 e
(u!) W ;dap �l
Whitelace Stream Enhancement and Wetland Restoration Project
Stantec - Monitoring Year 6 of 6 - Final
Page 33
November 2011

M
d'
ate+ N
Cu 0 M
` M
O
O
3°
C Z
3
V r
d
O
N —
d
G
o (u) uoiaepoloaJd
rn CO n m to v CO N o
--------
— — — — / — — —
0 c�
°0
C Ca
W ar
to
t
m�
(n
T
M O
0
O
mop
m
U
7
(n
C
7
O
C7
C
0
0 m
to
t0)
�c
w c
c 3 c2
M
O 0�
0) on 0 o
L
s
D-
0 to O to O to N
(ui) 41dap
LO
N M M
L!
Oe"
?!
!!
O
1; /z
!!
O
!
L!
Oe/9/S
L!
19,
m
Oe 11 in
/9
L!
O
C./s /9
!!
Off/
Oc /,
/O
OC /L
/Ie
L
o !Oe,
Whitelace Stream Enhancement and Wetland Restoration Project Page 34
Stantec — Monitoring Year 6 of 6 - Final November 2011

LL
CU o
D CO
L r
d�
M 0
30
.a o
�Z
0 u)
L �
f� (V
o�
N —
d
►i
J
0 (ui) uope;idi3a�d
�— O 00 t` (O In It M N � O
0
W
(a
— — —
— — — —
— — _ — — _ — —
R
w C
O
a r°n °D
C m o
W (n
rn�
c
I 3
o
M
0
U
1 O
3
`n
O Ol
U)
a
T ��
(0 C rn r
�
U
C CO
m CD
o
C7
m
6 ch
mo
IA-
0-
N
a
v
.3
v
a�
!!
O2�
!!
!!
0(:;"
19
!!
O
2/98
10��9 0
O
!!
Oe,s /s
!!
Oe.
"A,
!!
01-
o
LO o LO o o LO o �n o !
� 0
r i N N M
(ul) yadaa �!
Whitelace Stream Enhancement and Wetland Restoration Project Page 35
Stantec – Monitoring Year 6 of 6 - Final November 2011

ti
O p
CU L es
a+ C
3 °0
�o
C Z
O N
L �
C7 M
d
O �
04 —_
d
O (ui) uopuI!di08Jd
aR 01 ao r O lrr v CO N O
!!
02�(9
!!
!
!!
!
0e,
9 -6'
0CI19/-
!!
O
C'iy/ p
1!
OCI�s /9
!!
!!
01- /
d�6
!.e
Oa
i0
Oe-
O IA O O N N M M d' !!Oe
!/
(ui) 4ldaa !
Whitelace Stream Enhancement and Wetland Restoration Project Page 36
Stantec — Monitoring Year 6 of 6 - Final November 2011
1
6 c�
W a)
J)
a)—
c o
m �
0
0
U
U)
c
0
0
c
0
010
w
C v7
c
M C-
p c -3 cp
(D Al M
m C9 0
o.
Q
m
!!
02�(9
!!
!
!!
!
0e,
9 -6'
0CI19/-
!!
O
C'iy/ p
1!
OCI�s /9
!!
!!
01- /
d�6
!.e
Oa
i0
Oe-
O IA O O N N M M d' !!Oe
!/
(ui) 4ldaa !
Whitelace Stream Enhancement and Wetland Restoration Project Page 36
Stantec — Monitoring Year 6 of 6 - Final November 2011

.0
CL
M
C9
N �
a+ C
C -
N O
V �
� R
OU
a�
'L
�i O
O Z
M
r
O �
N 3
Y O
yU
G1 �-
U c
m m
U J
lC
L
O OD (O �T N O
r r r r
(•ui uoi ;e ;dioaM
U
Q
d
to
�1
7
Q
m
a
C
d
_T U
3 N
� a
0
m
c �
� a
= V
c a
0 `s
ro
T
N
R
C
a
LL.Q o
Q I
rn
4
N
C
l6
Whitelace Stream Enhancement and Wetland Restoration Project Page 37
Stantec — Monitoring Year 6 of 6 - Final November 2011

Table 10 -Summary of Groundwater Results for Years 1 - 6
Whitelace Creek Stream Enhancement and Wetland Restoration Project / EEP Project No.
Success Criteria Achieved/Max Consecutive Days During Growing Season
We rce nt e
Year 1 2006
Year 2 2007
Year 3 2008
Year 4 2009
Year 5 2010
Year 6 2011
Gua a
GW 1
Yes /234 days
Yes /73 days
Yes /160 days
Yes /234 days
Yes /234 days
Yes /130 days
(100% )
(31% )
(68%)
(100%
(1000/0)
(56 %)
GW2
Yes /140 days
No
Yes /93 days
Yes /135 days
Yes /58 days
Yes /63 days
(60% )
(40%)
(58 %)
(43% )
(27%
GW3
Yes /234 days
Yes /92 days
Yes /106 days
Yes /234 days
Yes /153 days
Yes /202 days
(100% )
(39%)
(45%)
(100%
(65%
(86%
GW4
Yes /119 days
No
Yes /38 days
Yes /152 days
Yes/ 146 days
Yes/ 90 days
(51 % )
(16%)
(65% )
(62% )
(38 %)
GW5
Yes /234 days
Yes /66 days
Yes /94 days
Yes /141 days
Yes /70 days
Yes /69 days
100%
(28%)
(40%)
60%
30%
29%
GW6
Yes /234 days
Yes /146 days
Yes /118 days
Yes /234 days
Yes /110 days
Yes /99 days
(100% )
(62%)
(50%)
(100% )
(47% )
(42%
GW7
Yes /234 days
Yes /234 days
Yes /107 days
Yes /234 days
Yes /90 days
Yes /109 days
100%
(100%)
(46%)
100%
38%
47%
Reference
Yes /70 days
Yes /450 days
Unknown
Yes /39 days
Yes /44 days
Yes /49 days
Well 1
(30%)
19%
17%
19%
21%
Reference
Yes /70 days
Yes /93 days
Unknown
Yes /45 days
Yes /83 days
Yes /65 days
Well 2
(30%)
(40%)
19%
35%
28%
Reference
Yes /70 days
Yes /159 days
Yes /112 days
Yes /125 days
Yes /82 days
Yes /68 days
Well 3
(30% )
1 (68%)
(48%)
(53 %)
1 , (35% )
1 (29%
Whitelace Stream Enhancement and Wetland Restoration Project Page 38
Stantec — Monitoring Year 6 of 6 - Final November 2011