710029_Plan of Action_20180118

PLAN OF ACTION(Poa) FOR HIGH FREEBOARD AT ANIMAL FACILITIES
Facility Number: 71-29
County: Ponder
Facility Name: Barnhill Farms
Certified Operator Name: Kenny Barnhill Operator Number:
1. Current liquid level(s) in inches as measured from the current liquid level in the lagoon to the
lowest point on the top of the dam for lagoons without spillways; and from the current liquid level
in the lagoon to the bottom of the spillway for lagoons with spillways.
Lagoon Name/ID:
Spillway(Y or N):
Level(inches):
Lagoon'Z Lagoon 2 Lagoon 3 Lagoon 4 Lagoon 5
N
12
2. Check all applicable items
XXX Liquid level is within the designed structural freeboard elevations of one or more structures.
Five and 30 day Plans of Action are attached. Hydraulic and agronomic balances are
within acceptable ranges.
Liquid level is within the 25 year 24 hour storm elevations for one or more structures. A
30 day Plan of Action is attached. Agronomic balance is within acceptable range.
Waste is to be pumped and hauled to off site locations. Bolume and PAN content of waste
to be pumped and hauled is reflected in section III tables. Included within this plan is a list
of the proposed sites with related facility numbers, number of acres and receiving crop
information. Contact and secure approval from the DWQ prior to transfer of waste to a site
not covered in the facility's CAWMP.
Operation will be partially or fully depopulated.
*Attach a complete schedule with corresponding animal units and dates for depopulation
*if animals are to be moved to another permitted facility, provide facility number, lagoon
freeboard levels and herd population for the receiving facility
3. Earliest possible date to begin land application of waste:
I hereby certify that I have reviewed the information listed above and included within the
attached Plan of Action, and to the best of my knowledge and ability, the information is
accurate and correct.
Kenny Barnhill Phone:
Facility Owner/Manager (print)
Kenny Barnhill Date: 2/21/2018
Facility Owner/Manager (signature)

II. TOTAL VOLUME OF WASTE STORED WITHIN STRUCTURAL FREEBOARD ELEVATIONS
FOR ALL WASTE STRUCTURES FOR FACILITY
1. structure ID: 71-29
2. structure ID:
3. structure ID:
4. structure ID:
5. structure ID:
6. structure ID:
n.lines 1+2+3+4+5+6=
o. line n / 27154 =
line I = 14490 gallons
line I = gallons
line I = gallons
line I = gallons
line I = gallons
line I = gallons
14490 gallons
0.53 acre -inches
III. TOTAL ACRES AVAILABLE TO RECEIVE WASTE DURING 5 DAY DRAW DOWN PERIOU,2
'While this section deals with hydraulic loading capacities, applications cannot exceed
agronomic rate for receiving crop according to its certified waste plan.
2Fields with no remaining PAN balance, no receiving crop, and/or completely saturated are
not considered available to receive waste.
p. tract #
q. field #
r. soil type
s. crop
I. acres
u. remaining IRR-2
PAN balance
(lb/acre)
v.
maximum
application
rate (in/hr)
W.
maximu
m
applicat
ion
amount
(inches
743
1
Small Grain Overs
2.10
48.55
0.51
1
743
3
Small Grain Overs
1.60
46.92
0.5
1
743
5
Small Grain Overs
2.00
48.77
0.5
1
743
7
Small Grain Overs
2.10
48.46
0.5
1
0.5
1
0.5
1
0.51
1
051
1
x. total acres available during 6 day draw down (sum of column t) = 7.80 acres

IV. 1 ACILITY'S PoA OVERALL HYDRAULIC LOAD TO BE LAND APPLIED PER ACRE
y. flues = 0.07 inches per acre to be applied within 5 days
line x
If unable to land apply hydraulic load listed in line y, list course of action here including pump
and haul, depopulation, herd reduction, etc. For pump & haul and herd reduction options,
recalculate new hydraulic load based on new intormaaon.
Plan to land apply hydraulic load:
1 necrriha moisture conditions of fields? (e.g. Is there water standing in field; does irrigation
equipment mar down in field; "trafficability" across soils; will soils absorb application without runot
Fields are very wet.
2. Date and amount of last raintall event?
DATE: AMOUNT: =inches
z pates f laat wa5te annliration event per field:
12/21/17
4. Given optimum soil and weatner conanions, is Irr1rdl1u1 I cyuq n,cn aNav rrv•••o
etc.)
me in
ine "n" at appropriate seasonal (i.e. winter) application rates within 5 days?
Yes it is capable
5. Irrigation schedule for next 5 days - include daily schedule; proposed application rates and amounts
per irrigation event; changes made in gun sizes, nozzles, "o" rings, operating time, travel speed, etc. to
meet proposed changes in application rates and amounts; and
Shorter pumping times and lower applications will be used.
Mr. Barnhills daughter Kendi called 2/21/17 to ask me to do a 5 day POA. This POA was created
on 2/21/18 by Sam Edwards Environmental Specalist/Division of Soil and Water Conservation.
Mr. Barnhill also has more small grain PAN available.
tion.

PLAN OF ACTION (PoA) FOR HIGH FREEBOARD AT ANIMAL FACILITIES
FIVE (5) DAY DRAW DOWN PERIOD
I. TOTAL VOLUME TO BE LAND APPLIED PER WASTE STRUCTURE
1. structure Name/Identifier (ID): 1 Lagoon
2. Current liquid volume in structural freeboard
a. current liquid level according to marker
b. designed structural freeboard zone
(Normally 12 inches or greater)
c. line b - line a (inches within structural freeboard) _
d. top of dike surface area according to design
(area at below structural freeboard elevation)
e. line c/12 x line d x 7.48 gallons/ft3
3. Projected volume of waste liquid produced during draw down period
12.0 inches
12.0 inches
inches
60450 ftz
gallons
f. temporary storage period according to structural design 180 days
g. volume of waste produced according to structural design 80750 ft3
h. current herd # 1000 certified herd # 2448
actual waste produced = current herd # x line g =
certified herd #
i. volume of wash water according to structural design
j. excess rainfall over evaporation according to design
k. (lines h + i + j) x 7.48 x 5 days/line f =
4. Total volume of waste to be land applied during 5 day draw down
I. total volume to be land applied line e + line k =
32986 ft3
�ft3
36750 ft3
14490 gallons
14490 gallons
REPEAT SECTION 1 FOR EACH WASTE STRUCTURE ON SITE WITH A LIQUID LEVEL WITHIN
THE STRUCTURAL FREEBOARD ELEVATIONS. (Click on the next Structure tab shown below)

PLAN OF ACTION(Poa) FOR HIGH FREEBOARD AT ANIMAL FACILITIES
Facility Number. 71-29
Facility Name: Barnhill Farms
County Pender
Certified Operator Name: Kenny Barnhill Operator Number:
1. Current liquid level(s) in inches as measured from the current liquid level in the lagoon to the
lowest point on the top of the dam for lagoons without spillways; and from the current liquid level
in the lagoon to the bottom of the spillway for lagoons with spillways.
Lagoon 1 Lagoon 2 Lagoon 3 Lagoon 4 Lagoon 5
Lagoon Name/ID:
Spillway(Y or N):
Level(inches):
2. Check all applicable items
13
Liquid level is within the designed structural freeboard elevations of one or more structures.
Five and 30 day Plans of Action are attached. Hydraulic and agronomic balances are
within acceptable ranges.
XXX Liquid level is within the 25 year 24 hour storm elevations for one or more structures. A
30 day Plan of Action is attached. Agronomic balance is within acceptable range.
Waste is to be pumped and hauled to off site locations. Bolume and PAN content of waste
to be pumped and hauled is reflected in section III tables. Included within this plan is a list
of the proposed sites with related facility numbers, number of acres and receiving crop
information. Contact and secure approval from the DWQ prior to transfer of waste to a site
not covered in the facility's CAWMP.
Operation will be partially or fully depopulated.
*Attach a complete schedule with corresponding animal units and dates for depopulation
*if animals are to be moved to another permitted facility, provide facility number, lagoon
freeboard levels and herd population for the receiving facility
3. Earliest possible date to begin land application of waste:
I hereby certify that I have reviewed the information listed above and included within the
attached Plan of Action, and to the best of my knowledge and ability, the information is
accurate and correct.
Kenny Barnhill Phone:
Facility Owner/Manager (print)
Kenny Barnhill Date: 2/23/2018
Facility Owner/Manager (signature)
bD Q
P�`

PLAN OF ACTION (PoA) FOR HIGH FREEBOARD AT ANIMAL FACILITIES
30 DAY DRAW DOWN PERIOD
I. TOTAL PAN TO BE LAND APPLIED PER WASTE STRUCTURE
1 Structure Name/Identifier (ID): I Lagoon #1
2. Current liquid volume in 25 yr./24 hr storm storage & structural freeboard
a. current liquid level according to marker
b designed 25 yr./24 hr. storm & structural freeboard
c line b - line a (inches in red zone) _
d, top of dike surface area according to design
(area at below structural freeboard elevation)
e. line c/12 x line d x 7 48 gallons/ft3
3 Projected volume of waste liquid produced during draw down period
f. temporary storage period according to structural design
14.0 inches
19.5 inches
5.5 inches
39000 ft2
133705 gallons
180 days
g. volume of waste produced according to structural design 40153.3 ft3
h. current herd # F 500 certified herd # 1224
actual waste produced = current herd # x line g =
certified herd #
i. volume of wash water according to structural design
j. excess rainfall over evaporation according to design
k. (lines h + i +j) x 7.48 x 30 days/line f=
4. Total PAN to be land applied during draw down period
I. current waste analysis dated 1 12/14/2017
m. ((lines e + k)/1000) x line I =
REPEAT SECTION I FOR EACH WASTE STRUCTURE ON SITE.
(Click on the next Structure tab shown below)
16402 ft'
0 It
25878 ft3
52710 gallons
0.57 Ibs/1000 gal.
106.3 Ibs. PAN
PoA (30 Day) 2/21/00

PLAN OF ACTION (PoA) FOR HIGH FREEBOARD AT ANIMAL FACILITIES
30 DAY DRAW DOWN PERIOD
I. TOTAL PAN TO BE LAND APPLIED PER WASTE STRUCTURE
1. Structure Name/Identifier (ID): I Lagoon #2
2. Current liquid volume in 25 yr /24 hr. storm storage & structural freeboard
a current liquid level according to marker
b. designed 25 yr./24 hr storm & structural freeboard
c, line b - line a (inches in red zone) _
d top of dike surface area according to design
(area at below structural freeboard elevation)
e. line c/12 x line d x 7.48 gallons/ft'
3. Projected volume of waste liquid produced during draw down period
f temporary storage period according to structural design
13.0 inches
19.0 inches
6.0 inches
60450 ft2
226083 gallons
180 days
g. volume of waste produced according to structural design 80705 ft3
h. current herd # 500 certified herd # 2448
actual waste produced = current herd # x line g =
certified herd #
i. volume of wash water according to structural design
j excess rainfall over evaporation according to design
k (lines h + i + j) x 7 48 x 30 days/line f=
4. Total PAN to be land applied during draw down period
I. current waste analysis dated 12/14/2017
m. ((lines e + k)/1000) x line I =
REPEAT SECTION I FOR EACH WASTE STRUCTURE ON SITE.
(Click on the next Structure tab shown below)
16484 ft'
0 ft3
36750 ft3
66365 gallons
0.57 Ibs/1000 gal.
166.7 Ibs. PAN
PoA (30 Day) 2/21/00

II. TOTAL POUNDS OF PAN STORED WITHIN STRUCTURAL FREEBOARD AND/OR 25 YR./24
HR. STORM STORAGE ELEVATIONS IN ALL WASTE STRUCTURES FOR FACILITY
1. Structure ID: Lagoon#1 line m = 106.3 lb PAN
2. Structure ID: Lagoon #2 line m = 166 7 lb PAN
3. Structure ID: line m = lb PAN
4. Structure ID:
5. Structure ID
6. Structure ID
n.lines 1+2+3+4+5+6=
line m = lb PAN
line m = lb PAN
line m = lb PAN
273 0 lb PAN
III. TOTAL PAN BALANCE REMAINING FOR AVAILABLE CROPS DURING 30 DAY DRAW DOWN
PERIOD. DO NOT LIST FIELDS TO WHICH PAN CANNOT BE APPL IFD DURING THIS sn DAY PFRInn
o. tract #
p. field #
q. crop
r. acres
s. remaining IRR
2 PAN balance
(lb/acre)
L TOTAL PAN
BALANCE FOR
FIELD (Ibs.)
column r x s
u. application window'
743
1
Small Grain Overseed
2.10
48.55
102.0
10/1-3/31
743
3
Small Grain Overseed
1.60
46.92
75.1
10/1-3/31
743
5
Small Grain Overseed
2.00
48.77
97.5
10/1-3/31
743
7
Small Grain Overseed
2.10
48.46
101.8
10/1-3/31
743
8
Small Grain Overseed
2.10
48.30
101.4
10/1-3/31
743
11
Small Grain Overseed
3.80
47.34
179.9
10/1-3/31
743
12
Small Grain Overseed
2.80
47.52
133A
10/1-3/31
743
13
Small Grain Overseed
4.90
47.55
233.0
10/1-3131
state current crop ending application date or next crop application beginning date for available
receiving crops during 30 day draw down period.
v. Total PAN available for all fields (sum of column t) = 1023.7 lb. PAN
IV. FACILITY'S PDA OVERALL PAN BALANCE
w. Total PAN to be land applied (line n from section II) = 273.0 lb. PAN
x. Crop's remaining PAN balance (line v from section III) = 1023.7 lb. PAN
y. Overall PAN balance (w - x) = -751 lb. PAN
PDA (30 Day) 2/21/00

Line y must show as a deficit. If line y does not show as a deficit, list course of action here including pump and
haul, depopulation, herd reduction, etc. For pump & haul and herd reduction options, recalculate new PAN
based on new information. If new fields are to be included as an option for lowering lagoon level, add these
fields to the PAN balance table and recalculate the overall PAN balance. If animal waste is to be hauled to
another permitted facility, provide information regarding the herd population and lagoon freeboard levels at the
receiving facility.
Irrigation onto existing spray fields will continue as weather and field conditions permit. This farm has more
pumping fields if necessary This POA was completed by Sam Edwards Environmental Specalist with
NCDA/Soil and Water on 2/23/18.
PoA (30 Day) 2/21/00

PLAN OF ACTION(Poa) FOR HIGH FREEBOARD AT ANIMAL FACILITIES
Facility Number:
Facility Name:
71-29
Barnhill Fams
County: Pender
Certified Operator Name: Kenney Barnhill Operator Number:
1. Current liquid level(s) in inches as measured from the current liquid level in the lagoon to the
lowest point on the top of the dam for lagoons without spillways: and from the current liquid level
in the lagoon to the bottom of the spillway for lagoons with spillways.
Lagoon'$ Lagoon 2 Lagoon 3 Lagoon 4 Lagoon 5
Lagoon Name/ID: e 2. 2
Spillway(Y or N): N
Level(inches): 13
2. Check all applicable items
Liquid level is within the designed structural freeboard elevations of one or more structures.
Five and 30 day Plans of Action are attached. Hydraulic and agronomic balances are
within acceptable ranges.
XXX Liquid level is within the 25 year 24 hour storm elevations for one or more structures. A
30 day Plan of Action is attached. Agronomic balance is within acceptable range.
Waste is to be pumped and hauled to off site locations. Bolume and PAN content of waste
to be pumped and hauled is reflected in section III tables. Included within this plan is a list
of the proposed sites with related facility numbers, number of acres and receiving crop
information. Contact and secure approval from the DWQ prior to transfer of waste to a site
not covered in the facility's CAWMP.
Operation will be partially or fully depopulated.
*Attach a complete schedule with corresponding animal units and dates for depopulation
*if animals are to be moved to another permitted facility, provide facility number, lagoon
freeboard levels and herd population for the receiving facility
3. Earliest possible date to begin land application of waste:
I hereby certify that I have reviewed the information listed above and included within the
attached Plan of Action, and to the best of my knowledge and ability, the information is
accurate and correct.
Kenney Barnhill Phone:
Facility Owner/Manager (print)
Kenny Barnhill Date: 2/21/2018
Facility Owner/Manager (signature)

u
II. TOTAL POUNDS OF PAN STORED WITHIN STRUCTURAL FREEBOARD AND/OR 25 YR./24
HR. STORM STORAGE ELEVATIONS IN ALL WASTE STRUCTURES FOR FACILITY
1. Structure ID: Lagoon#!& line m = 178.4 lb PAN
2. Structure ID:
3. Structure ID:
4. Structure ID:
5. Structure ID:
6. Structure ID:
In. lines 1+2+3+4+5+6=
line in = lb PAN
line m = lb PAN
I a - u 170101
line m = lb PAN
line m = to PAN
178.4 lb PAN
III. TOTAL PAN BALANCE REMAINING FOR AVAILABLE CROPS DURING 30 DAY DRAW DOWN
PERIOD. DO NOT LIST FIELDS TO WHICH PAN CANNOT BE APPLIED DURING THIS 30 DAY PERIOD.
o. tract #
p. field #
q. crop
r. acres
s. remaining IRR
2 PAN balance
(lb/acre)
I. TOTAL PAN
BALANCE FOR
FIELD (Ibs.)
column r x s
u. application window
743
1
Small Grain Overseed
2.10
48.55
102.0
10/1-3/31
743
3
Small Grain Overseed
1.60
46.92
75.1
10/1-3/31
743
5
Small Grain Overseed
2.00
48.77
97.5
10/1-3/31
743
7
Small Grain Overseed
2.10
48.46
101.8
10/1-3/31
'State current crop ending application date or next crop application beginning date for available
receiving crops during 30 day draw down period.
v. Total PAN available for all fields (sum of column t) = 376.3 lb. PAN
IV. FACILITY'S FDA OVERALL PAN BALANCE
w. Total PAN to be land applied (line n from section 11) = 178.4 lb. PAN
x. Crop's remaining PAN balance (line v from section 111) = 376.3 lb. PAN
y. Overall PAN balance (w - x) = -198 lb. PAN
PoA (30 Day) 2/21/00

Line y must show as a deficit. If line y does not show as a deficit, list course of action here including pump and
haul, depopulation, herd reduction, etc. For pump & haul and herd reduction options, recalculate new PAN
based on new information. If new fields are to be included as an option for lowering lagoon level, add these
fields to the PAN balance table and recalculate the overall PAN balance. If animal waste is to be hauled to
another permitted facility, provide information regarding the herd population and lagoon freeboard levels at the
receiving facility.
Irrigation onto existing spray fields will continue as weather and field conditions permit. This farm has more
pumping fields if necessary. This PDA was completed by Sam Edwards Environmental Specalist with NCDA/Soil
and Water on 2/21/18.
PoA (30 Day) 2/21/00

PLAN OF ACTION (PoA) FOR HIGH FREEBOARD AT ANIMAL FACILITIES
30 DAY DRAW DOWN PERIOD
I. TOTAL PAN TO BE LAND APPLIED PER WASTE STRUCTURE
1. Structure Name/Identifier (ID): I Lagoon #1
2. Current liquid volume in 25 yr./24 hr. storm storage & structural freeboard
a. current liquid level according to marker
b. designed 25 yr./24 hr. storm & structural freeboard
c. line b - line a (inches in red zone) _
d. top of dike surface area according to design
(area at below structural freeboard elevation)
e. line c/12 x line d x 7.48 gallons/ft'
3. Projected volume of waste liquid produced during draw down period
f. temporary storage period according to structural design
13.0 inches
19.0 inches
6.0 inches
60450 ftZ
226083 gallons
180 days
g. volume of waste produced according to structural design 80705 ft3
h. current herd # 1000 certified herd # 2448
actual waste produced = current herd # x line g =
certified herd #
i. volume of wash water according to structural design
j. excess rainfall over evaporation according to design
k. (lines h + i + j) x 7.48 x 30 days/line f=
4. Total PAN to be land applied during draw down period
I. current waste analysis dated 12/14/2017
m. ((lines e + k)/1000) x line I =
REPEAT SECTION I FOR EACH WASTE STRUCTURE ON SITE.
(Click on the next Structure tab shown below)
32968 ft'
0 ft3
36750 ft3
86915 gallons
0.57 Ibs/1000 gal.
178.4 Ibs. PAN
PoA (30 Day) 2/21/00

F LAN OF ACTION(Poa) FOR HIGH FREEBOARD AT ANIMAL FACILITIES
Facility Number: 71-29
Facility Name: Barnhill Farms
County: Pender
Certified Operator Name: Kenny Barnhill Operator Number:
1. Current liquid level(s) in inches as measured from the current liquid level in the lagoon to the
lowest point on the top of the dam for lagoons without spillways; and from the current liquid level
in the lagoon to the bottom of the spillway for lagoons with spillways.
Lagoon Name/ID:
Spillway(Y or N):
Level(inches):
Lagoon Lagoon 2 Lagoon 3 Lagoon 4 Lagoon 5
2
N
10
2. Check all applicable items
XXX Liquid level is within the designed structural freeboard elevations of one or more structures.
Five and 30 day Plans of Action are attached. Hydraulic and agronomic balances are
within acceptable ranges.
Liquid level is within the 25 year 24 hour storm elevations for one or more structures. A
30 day Plan of Action is attached. Agronomic balance is within acceptable range.
Waste is to be pumped and hauled to off site locations. Bolume and PAN content of waste
to be pumped and hauled is reflected in section III tables. Included within this plan is a list
of the proposed sites with related facility numbers, number of acres and receiving crop
information. Contact and secure approval from the DWQ prior to transfer of waste to a site
not covered in the facility's CAWMP.
Operation will be partially or fully depopulated.
*Attach a complete schedule with corresponding animal units and dates for depopulation
*if animals are to be moved to another permitted facility, provide facility number, lagoon
freeboard levels and herd population for the receiving facility
3. Earliest possible date to begin land application of waste:
I hereby certify that I have reviewed the information listed above and included within the
attached Plan of Action, and to the best of my knowledge and ability, the information is
accurate and correct.
Kenny Barnhill
Facility Owner/Manager (print)
Kenny Barnhill
Facility Owner/Manager (signature)
Phone:
Date: 2/23/2018 ��

PLAN OF ACTION (PoA) FOR HIGH FREEBOARD AT ANIMAL FACILITIES
FIVE (5) DAY DRAW DOWN PERIOD
1. Structure Name/Identifier (ID): I Lagoon 42
2. Current liquid volume in structural freeboard
a. current liquid level according to marker
b. designed structural freeboard zone
(Normally 12 inches or greater)
c. line b - line a (inches within structural freeboard) _
d. top of dike surface area according to design
(area at below structural freeboard elevation)
e. line c/12 x line d x 7.48 gallons/ft3
3. Projected volume of waste liquid produced during draw down period
10.0 inches
12.0 inches
2.0 inches
60450 ftz
75361 gallons
f. temporary storage period according to structural design 180 days
g. volume of waste produced according to structural design 80750 ft3
h. current herd # 500 certified herd # 2448
actual waste produced = current herd # x line g =
certified herd #
i. volume of wash water according to structural design
j. excess rainfall over evaporation according to design
k. (lines h + i + j) x 7.48 x 5 days/line f =
4. Total volume of waste to be land applied during 5 day draw down
I. total volume to be land applied line e + line k =
16493 ft3
0 ft3
36750 ft3
11063 gallons
86424 gallons
REPEAT SECTION 1 FOR EACH WASTE STRUCTURE ON SITE WITH A LIQUID LEVEL WITHIN
THE STRUCTURAL FREEBOARD ELEVATIONS. (Click on the next Structure tab shown below)

If. TOTAL VOLUME OF WASTE STORED WITHIN STRUCTURAL FREEBOARD ELEVATIONS
FOR ALL WASTE STRUCTURES FOR FACILITY
1. structure ID: 71-29
line I =
86424 gallons
2. structure ID:
line I =
gallons
3. structure ID:
line I =
gallons
4. structure ID:
line I =
gallons
5. structure ID:
line I =
gallons
6. structure ID:
line I =
gallons
n. lines 1 + 2 + 3 + 4 + 5 + 6 =
o. line n / 27154 =
86424 gallons
3.18 acre -inches
III. TOTAL ACRES AVAILABLE TO RECEIVE WASTE DURING 5 DAY DRAW DOWN PERIOD''2
'While this section deals with hydraulic loading capacities, applications cannot exceed
agronomic rate for receiving crop according to its certified waste plan.
'Fields with no remaining PAN balance, no receiving crop, and/or completely saturated are
not considered available to receive waste.
p. tract #
q. field #
r. soil type
s. crop
t. acres
u remaining IRR-2
PAN balance
(lb/acre)
v
maximum
application
rate (in/hr)
w
maximu
no
applicat
ion
amount
(inches
743
1
Small Grain OverSE
2.10
48.55
0.5
1
743
3
Small Grain OverSE
1.60
46.92
0.5
1
743
5
Small Grain OverSE
2.00
48.77
0.5
1
743
7
Small Grain OverSE
2.10
48.46
0.5
1
743
8
Small Grain OverSE
2.10
48.3
0.5
1
743
11
Small Grain OverSE
3.80
47.34
0.5
1
743
12
Small Grain Overse
2.80
47.52
0.5
1
743
13
Small Grain Overse
4.90
47.55
0.5
1
743
14
Small Grain Overse
3.10
47.6
0.5
1
x. total acres available during 5 day draw down (sum of column t) = 24.50 acres

IV. FACILITY'S PoA OVERALL HYDRAULIC LOAD TO BE LAND APPLIED PER ACRE
Y. line o = 0.13 inches per acre to be applied within 5 days
line x
If unable to land apply hydraulic load listed in line y, list course of action here including pump
and haul, depopulation, herd reduction, etc. For pump & haul and herd reduction options,
recalculate new hydraulic load based on new information.
land apply hydraulic load:
1. Describe moisture conditions of fields? (e.g. Is there water standing in field; does irrigation
equipment mar down in field; "trafficability" across soils; will soils absorb application without runoff, etc.)
Fields are very wet.
2. Date and amount of last rainfall event?
DATE:
1/24/18
AMOUNT: inches
4. Given optimum soil and weather conditions, is irrigation equipment capable of applying the volume in
line "n" at appropriate seasonal (i.e. winter) application rates within 5 days?
Yes it is capable
S. Irrigation schedule for next 5 days - include daily schedule; proposed application rates and amounts
per irrigation event; changes made in gun sizes, nozzles, "o" rings, operating time, travel speed, etc. to
meet proposeo cnanges in appucauon rates anu arnoums; anu any oorer iniorniauun iui wiimuer
Shorter pumping times and lower applications will be used.
Mr. Barnhills daughter Kendi called 2/22/17 to ask me to do a 5 day PDA. This PDA was created
on 2/23/18 by Sam Edwards Environmental Specalist/Division of Soil and Water Conservation.
ition.

facility Number -
VJ Division of Water Resources
0 Division of Soil and Water Conservation
0 Other Agency
xyp�vl .i,ir, v wugnutuce inspection v r)permom eview U structure Evaluation U Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: 0 Routine 0 Complaint ollow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit: / Arrival Time: O / Departure Time: County: Region:
Farm Name:
Owner Name:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Owner Email:
Phone:
Facility Contact: Title:
Onsite Representative: P^� (J fl/-�r A //
Certified Operator:
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Swine
Wean to Finish
Wean to Feeder
Feeder to Finish
Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feede
Farrow to Finish
Other
Other
Latitude:
Phone:
Integrator:
Certification Number:
Certification Number:
Longitude:
Design Current Design Current
Capacity Pop. Wet Poultry Capacity Pop.
Non--
La er
Design Current
Discharees and Stream Impacts
I. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other: _
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWR)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)? _
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWR)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters
of the State other than from a discharge?
Design Current
Cattle Capacity Pop.
Dairy Cow
Dairy Calf
Dairy Heifer
Dry Cow
Non -Dairy
Beef Stocker
Beef Feeder
Beef Brood Cow
❑ Yes ZNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes rNo
❑ NA ❑ NE
Yes❑ NA ❑ NE
Yes❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 1 of 3 21412015 Continuer!

Facility. Number: Date of Inspection:
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: _ k 2'
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in): -I-D
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environment
I threat,
notify DWR
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes [o ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes ONo ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes do ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s)
13. Soil Type(s):
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes LJ ❑ NA ❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes �o ❑ NA ❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ Yes LJ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA I lE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA [3/NE
the appropriate box.
❑WUP ❑Checklists El Design El Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Weather Code
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections ❑ Sludge Survey
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA 7 N
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA IFNE
Page 2 of 3 21412015 Continued

Facifly Number: 2 jDate of inspection: /
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA F/TN-E
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA C3'9—E
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ,e'NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification? ❑Yes ❑ No D NqA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do s surface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency?
:ter to question #): Explain any YES answers and/or any addi
of facility to better explain situations (use additional pages as
Reviewer/Inspector Name:
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
Page 3 of 3
❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ETNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Yes []No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes No ,❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
ons or any other comments.
/(N 5 4-e C y'� e). F-� \. '-- /4 p e ", �'
he r� t 12 e)
Pn#
YQ� 1( f�S ISllr ��/ (�1�1/ Phone: �� t �l0 730/
Date:
21412015

T-Z�
Miguez, Kristin
From: Powell, David C
Sent: Friday, March 16, 2018 4:37 PM
To: Mclawhorn, Martin; Lawson, Christine
Cc: Miguez, Kristin; Edwards, Sam; Young, Jeff; King, Morella s
Subject: RE: Summary of site visit: Fender Co facility 71-29 Barnhill topping farm
Thanks Martin and Sam and please be sure and pass along our thanks to Chris Love, Jason Lee, Stewart Satterwhite. I
think this will be sufficient for DWR but I want to be sure Christine is satisfied. Please be sure Kenny Barnhill gets a copy
in his records. I know he was considering having a surveyor come out and recheck since there was such a drastic change
in the lagoon markers. I am unsure if he proceeded with doing so. NCDA's finding seemed to be in line with what
Kristin, Aaron and myself guessed the level to be during our last inspection. Thanks again.
Thanks
David Powell, Environmental Specialist
North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality
Division of Water Resources
Water Quality Regional Operations Section
Wilmington Regional Office
127 Cardinal Drive Extension '
Wilmington, NC 28405-3845
0.
Tel. [phone]
Fax [phone]
E-mail correspondence to and from this address may be subject to the North Carolina Public Records Law and
may be disclosed to third parties.
From: Mclawhorn, Martin
Sent: Friday, March 16, 2018 9:28 AM
To: Powell, David C <[e-mail]>
Subject: FW: Summary of site visit: Pender Co facility 71-29 Barnhill topping farm
This is the info you requested.
Martin
From: Kennedy, Tim
Sent: Thursday, March 08, 2018 12:02 PM
To: Mclawhorn, Martin <[e-mail]>
Cc: Love, Chris <[e-mail]>; Young, Jeff <[e-mail]>
Subject: Summary of site visit: Fender Cc facility 71-29 Barnhill topping farm

Martin,
Not knowing the format you want this in, I'm going to just put it in an email. I can attach it as a letter if that doesn't
suffice.
Chris Love, Jason Lee, Stewart Satterwhite and I traveled to the Kenny Barnhill Farm in Atkinson, NC on Thursday, Feb.
22, 2018 to meet Environmental Specialists Martin McLawhorn and Sam Edwards to reset hog lagoon markers that had
been raised on two ponds. We set up a laser level between the two ponds and took shots on the top of both dams to
find the low spot on each. The readings were 6.40' for the southern pond and 6.14' for the northern pond. Chris and
Jason then used a boat to drive fiberglass lagoon markers, with freeboard levels marked in red, to where the top of the
marker matched the low dam elevation for each respective pond. The original markers were not removed due to the
possibility of leakage through the holes that would be left in the lagoon liners. Martin reported to us by email that "the
original marker in the front lagoon (southern) was recorded at 21" and the back lagoon (northern) was recorded at
27". With the installment of new lagoon markers, the front lagoon freeboard level was recorded at 14" and the back
lagoon was recorded at 10"."
Chris and I were also asked to look at the drainage around the hog houses protecting the lagoons from surface water. It
seems attempts had been made to provide drainage away from the lagoons, but the drainage systems had been rutted
by equipment. Regrading needs to be done to ensure positive drainage towards the tile located in the low spot between
the two ponds. V-ditches should be a minimum of 1' in depth, with 8:1 side slopes where farming equipment may cross
the ditch and 3:1 side slopes elsewhere. Crossing the ditches should be limited if possible, with ingress/egress moved to
the eastern side of the northern hog houses if feasible.
Tim Kennedy, PE
Environmental Engineer
Division of Soil and Water Conservation
NC Dept. of Agriculture & Consumer Services
1614 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1614
Phone: [phone] FAX: [phone]
Note: New Phone Number