670063_Compliance Evaluation Inspection_20200131

Division of Water Resources
Facility Number i - O Division of Soil and Water Conservation
O Other Agency
Type of Visit: ® Compliance Inspection O Operation Review O Structure Evaluation O Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: (�) Routine O Complaint O Follow-up O Referral O Emergency O Other O Denied Access
Date of Visit: 3 Arrival Time: Departure Time: County: Region:
Farm Name: �y��ry� Owner Email:
Owner Name: Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: IL2 i e-- 9:-Lc�S Title:
Onsite Representative:
Certified Operator:
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Swine
Wean to Finish
Wean to Feeder
Feeder to Finish
Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder
Farrow to Finish
Gilts
Boars
Other
Other
Integrator:
Phone: G 10 (, S—Q -15ci
Certification Number:
Certification Number:
Latitude:
Design Current Design Current
Capacity Pop. Wet Poultry Capacity Pop.
Layer
Non -Layer
Design Current
Dry Ponitry Canaeity Pon.
Layers
Non -Layers
Pullets
Turkeys
Turkey Poults
Other
DischarSes and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWR)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
Longitude:
Design Current
Cattle Capacity Pop.
Dairy Cow
Dairy Calf
Dairy Heifer
Dry Cow
Non -Dairy
Beef Stocker
Beef Feeder
Beef Brood Cow
❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No DNA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No [.� ❑ NE
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWR) ❑ Yes
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters ❑ Yes
of the State other than from a discharge? 1
Page I of 3
r
❑No D< ❑NE
W. ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
21412015 Continued

Facility Number: (� - Date of Inspection: 1131 zo
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? Dyes No ❑ A ❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑Yes ❑ No LtLj NA ❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in): 31
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes EZNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWR
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes []/No ❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? 'es ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes [] N ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. TYes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
xcessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
FA ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s):
13. Soil Type(s):
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
❑ Yes
E3 <o
❑ NA
❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable
❑ Yes
[ -Ko
❑ NA
❑ NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
[/ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
El No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
[/3No
❑ NA
❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
❑ Yes
Ea<o
❑ NA
❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑ WUP ❑ Checklists ❑ Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑ Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. 2Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Weather Code
❑ Rainfall [7rStocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections ❑ Sludge Survey
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes � No ❑ NA ❑ N
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA NE
Page 2 of 3 21412015 Continued

Facility Number: - Date of inspection:
Isl
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑ Yes
axxo
❑ NA
❑ NE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ F i ure to complete annual sludge survey ❑ Failure to develop a POA for sludge
levels
Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
3
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance: �1
26. Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification?
❑ Yes
❑ No
E�to
❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
❑ Yes
[ "N' o
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
[l] No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
[:2-<o
❑ NA
❑ NE
[—]Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
[3 <
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative? ❑ Yes
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency? ❑ Yes
No ❑ NA .❑ NE
�No ❑ NA ❑ NE
E]rN'o ❑ NA ❑ NE
Comments (refer to question #): Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations, or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations (use additional pages as necessary).
L_'� re- GCS F-iz - 2- s"_cJ---�-
Reviewer/Inspector Name:
Phone
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: �/� Date
Page 3 of 3
aIo�'-Z©3 IF I©
,31
412o J5