20011492 Ver 1_COMPLETE FILE_20011012

`0? PG
Governor
?? r William G. Ross, Jr., Secretary
Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Alan W. Klimek, PE, Director
Division of Water Quality
June 4, 2002
(Replaces May 1, 2002 Approval)
DWQ Project # 01-1492
Durham County
Page 1 of 2
The Manson Company, Inc.
Ms. Patricia S. Manson
21 Stoneridge Circle
Durham, NC 27705
Subject Property: Eno Forest S/D (formerly Village by the Eno), 4213 Guess Rd. (SR1003), Durham, NC
PIN No. 0814-04-84-7223 & 0814-04-84-8730; 30.34, acres
USACE Action ID No. 2001121300
Unnamed tributary streams to the Eno River [03-04-01, 27-2-(10), WS-IV & B NSW]
APPROVAL of 401 Water Quality Certification and Authorization Certificate per the Neuse River Buffer Protection
Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0233) with ADDITIONAL CONDITIONS
Dear Ms. Manson:
You have our approval, in accordance with the attached conditions and those listed below, to impact 149 feet of perennial
stream and 14,343 ft2 (0.32 acres) of riparian buffers to construct the proposed road crossing at the subject property as
described within your revised application provided with the response letter from Sear-Brown dated May 17, 2002 and
received by the Wetlands/401 Unit on May 21, 2002. After reviewing your application, we have determined that this fill is
covered by the Division of Water Quality (DWQ) General Water Quality Certification Number 3362. This Certification
allows you to use Nationwide Permit No. 39 when issued by the US Army Corps of Engineers (USACE). This letter shall
also act as your approved Authorization Certificate for impacts to the protected Neuse riparian buffers as required under
15A NCAC 2B .0233(8). In addition, you should get or otherwise comply with any other federal, state and local
requirements before you go ahead with your project including (but not limited to) Erosion and Sediment Control Permit
and water supply regulations. Also, this approval will expire when the accompanying 404 permit expires unless otherwise
specified in the General Certification. This approval shall replace the one issued on May 1, 2002.
This approval is only valid for the purpose and design that you described in your application except as modified below. If
you change your project, you must notify us and you may be required to send us a new application. If the property is sold,
the new owner must be given a copy of this Certification and approval letter and is thereby responsible for complying with
all conditions. If total fills for this project (now or in the future) exceed one acre of wetland or 150 feet of stream,
compensatory mitigation may be required as described in 15A NCAC 2H .0506 (h). Also, if total fills associated
with the road crossing (now or in the future) exceed 113 acre or 150 feet of protected buffers, compensatory
buffer mitigation may be required as described in 15A NCAC 2B.0233. For this approval to be valid, you must follow
-the conditions listed in the DWQ General Water Quality Certification No. 3362 and any additional conditions listed below.
Conditions:
1. Diffuse Flow
An additional condition is that all stormwater shall be directed as diffuse flow at non-erosive velocities through the
protected stream buffers and will not re-concentrate before discharging into the stream as identified within 15A NCAC
213 .0233(5).
2. Sewer Systems
This letter does not approve any impacts to wetlands, streams or buffers associated with a sewer system. Any
proposed sewer systems associated with this project shall comply with relevant non-discharge regulations (15A
North Carolina Division of Water Quality, 401 Wetlands Certification Unit,
1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1650 (Mailing Address)
2321 Crabtree Blvd., Raleigh, NC 27604-2260 (Location)
919-733-1786 (phone), 919-733-6893 (fax), http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/newetiands/
rcayc c uI c
NCAC 2H .0200) and all other State, Federal and local sewer system regulations."
3. Deed notifications
Deed notifications or similar mechanisms shall be placed on all retained jurisdictional wetlands, waters and protective
buffers in order to assure compliance for future wetland, water and buffer impact. These mechanisms shall be put in
place prior to impacting any wetlands, waters and/or buffers approved for impact under this Certification Approval and
Authorization Certificate.
4. Certificate of Completion
Upon completion of all work approved within the 401 Water Quality Certification or applicable Buffer Rules, and any
subsequent modifications, the applicant is,required to return the attached certificate of completion to the 401/Wetlands
Unit, North Carolina Division of Water Quality, 1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC, 27699-1650.
If you do not accept any of the conditions of this certification, you may ask for an adjudicatory hearing. You must act
within 60 days of the date that you receive this letter. To ask for a hearing, send a written petition, which conforms to
Chapter 150B of the North Carolina General Statutes to the Office of Administrative Hearings, 6714 Mail Service Center,
Raleigh, NC 27699-6714. This certification and its conditions are final and binding unless you ask for a hearing.
On-Site Determination:
Please note that on June 4, 2002, Division of Water Quality (DWQ) staff conducted an on-site determination to review the
drainage feature closest to Guess Road on the subject property for applicability to the Neuse Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B
.0233). As a result of this on-site determination, the Division of Water Quality (DWQ) has determined that the drainage
feature indicated on the Durham County Soil Survey and located closest and parallel to Guess Road does not contain a
surface water subject to the Neuse Buffer Rules.
This letter completes the review of the Division of Water Quality under Section 401 of the Clean Water Act.. If you have
any questions, please telephone Mr. John Dorney at 919-733-9646.
Sincerely,
Klimek, PE
DWQ
Attachment: General Water Quality Certification. No. 3362
DWQ Certificate of Completion
Sample Deed Notification
Cc: Lynnise Hawes & Stephen Ballentine, Sear-Brown, 1000 Corporate Drive, Hillsborough, NC 27278
Steve Mitchell, DWQ Raleigh Regional Office
Todd Tugwell, USACE Raleigh Regulatory Field Office, 6508 Falls of Neuse Road, Suite 120, Raleigh, NC 27615
File Copy
Central Files
DWQ 011492
June 4, 2002
Eno Forev Subdivision
r ,.
Subject: Eno Forest Subdivision
Date: Wed, 5 Jun 2002 10:07:05 -0400
From: "Ballentine, Stephen" <[e-mail]>
To: "Bob Zarzecki (E-mail)" <bob.zarzecki @ncmail.net>
Hi Bob,
ate. <,0`&10Z_
Have you issued an approval letter for Eno Forest? Please fax a copy to me at 732-667.
Thanks,
Stephen
SEAR BROWN
Stephen Ballentine, P.E.
Professional Engineer
Land Development
1000 Corporate Drive
Suite 101
Hillsborough, NC 27278
Phone : ( 919 .-.7
Fax: [phone]
stephen.ba arbrown.com
1 of 1 6/6/02 7:43 An
rvuuiac? c . cnsiey
Governor
William G. Ross, Jr., Secretary
>_ - I Department of Environment and Natural Resources
4 Alan W. Klimek, PE, Director
Division of Water Quality
June 4, 2002
(Replaces May 1, 2002 Approval)
DWQ Project # 01-1492
Durham County
Page 1 of 2
The Manson Company, Inc.
Ms. Patricia S. Manson
21 Stoneridge Circle
Durham, NC 27705
Subject Property: Eno Forest S/D (formerly Village by the Eno), 4213 Guess Rd. (SR1003). Durham, NC
PIN No. 0814-04-84-7223 & 0814-04-84-8730; 30.34. acres
USACE Action ID No.. 2001121300
Unnamed tributary strearns to the Eno River [03-04-01, 27-2-(10), WS-IV & B NSW]
APPROVAL of 401 Water Quality Certification and Authorization Certificate per the Neuse River Buffer Protection
Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0233) with ADDITIONAL CONDITIONS
Dear Ms. Manson:
You have our approval, in accordance with the attached conditions and those listed below. to impact 149 feet of perennial
stream and 14,343 ft2 (0.32 acres) of riparian buffers to construct the proposed road crossing at the subject property as
described within your revised application provided with the response letter from Sear-Brown dated May 17, 2002 and
received by the Wetlands/401 Unit on May 21, 2002. After reviewing your application, we have determined that this fill is
covered by the Division of Water Quality (DWQ) General Water Quality Certification Number 3362. This Certification-
allows you to use Nationwide Permit No. 39 when issued by the US Army Corps of Engineers (USACE). This letter shall
also act as your approved Authorization Certificate for impacts to the protected Neuse riparian buffers as required under
15A NCAC 213 .0233(8). In addition, you should get or otherwise comply with any other federal, state and local
requirements before you go ahead with your project including (but not limited to) Erosion and Sediment Control Permit
and water supply regulations. Also, this approval will expire when the accompanying 404 permit expires unless otherwise
specified in the General Certification. This approval shall replace the one issued on May 1, 2002.
This approval is only valid for the purpose and design that you described in your application except as modified below. If
you change your project, you must notify us and you may be required to send us a new application. If the property is sold,
the new owner must be given a copy of this Certification and approval letter and is thereby responsible for complying with
all conditions. If total fills for this project (now or in the future) exceed one acre of wetland or 150 feet of stream,
compensatory mitigation may be required as described in 15A NCAC 2H .0506 (h). Also, if total fills associated
with the road crossing (now or in the future) exceed 1/3 acre or 150 feet of protected buffers, compensatory
buffer mitigation may be required as described in 15A NCAC 2B.0233. For this approval to be valid, you must follow
the conditions listed in the DWQ General Water Quality Certification No. 3362 and any additional conditions listed below.
Conditions:
1. Diffuse Flow
An additional condition is that all stormwat-er shall be directed as diffuse flow at non-erosive velocities through the
protected stream buffers and will not re-concentrate before discharging into the stream as identified within 15A NCAC
213 .0233(5). .
2. Sewer Systems
This letter does not approve any impacts to wetlands, streams or buffers associated with a sewer system. Any
proposed sewer systems associated with this project shall comply with relevant non-discharge regulations (15A
North Carolina Division of Water Quality, 401 Wetiands Certification Unit,
1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1650 (Mailing Address)
2321 Crabtree Blvd., Raleigh, NC 2'7604-2260 (Location)
919-733-1786 (phone), 919-733-6893 (fax), h:tp:/,'h2o.enr.state.nc.usfncwetiands/

I
May 17, 2002
Mr. Bob Zarzecki
North Carolina Division of Water Quality
401 Wetlands Certifications Unit
1650 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1650
Subject: Eno Forest Subdivision
DWQ # 01-1492
Dear Mr. Zarzecki:
ARCHITECTURE
ENGINEERING
PLANNING
CONSTRUCTION

1000 Corporate Drive
Hillsborough, NC 27278
919.732.3883 phone
919.732.6676 fax
www.searbrown.com
MAY
0
We are seeking DWQ approval for proposed Eno Forest Subdivision, in Durham, NC. Attached is a copy of a
letter from John Dorney of DWQ, dated May 1, 2002. You and I spoke about this project yesterday on the
telephone. Attached are a revised stream crossing application and a revised grading and storm drainage plan.
The following revisions have been made to satisfy DWQ concerns:
The spillway and level spreader outlet from Detention Pond #1 has been realigned to be perpendicular to the
slope, and away from the proposed fill slope on Blackstone Drive. As we discussed with Todd St. John's,
this will help to diffuse flow across the buffer.
The outlet pipe and level spreader from Detention Pond #4 has been relocated so that it no longer releases
into the existing gulley. As we discussed with Todd St. John's, this will help to diffuse flow across the
buffer. (Note that the emergency spillway from this pond still releases into the existing gulley. Todd said
that this is alright, and that we only need to diffuse flow for the 1-year, 24-hour storm.)
The geometry of Detention Pond #5 has been revised to create room for a proposed 50' long bermudagrass
vegetated conveyance. The new outlet pipe location will level spread and release flow from the 1-year, 24-
hour storm into this conveyance, where it will be treated across its' 50' length prior to entering the existing
intermittent channel (Not a Neuse Riparian Stream.). This revision was made consistently with your
recommendation on the phone yesterday.
Please take note of the following issues:
• I spoke with Debbie Edwards of DWQ this morning. Debbie met with Tim Morris of our office several
months ago and made a verbal ruling that the existing intermittent channel near Guess Road on our property
is not a Neuse Stream. She told me that yesterday, she mailed us a letter certifying the aforementioned
ruling. She sent a copy of this letter to your associate, John Dorney, which you should be able to obtain as
confirmation. When we receive the letter from her, we will fax it to you.
• As we discussed on the phone, DWQ will not be requiring stormwater BMP's on this project, provided that
we can provide diffuse flow for the 1-year, 24-hour storm across the 50' Neuse Riparian Stream Buffers. (If
we exceeded 30% impervious coverage, then BMP's would be required by DWQ, but our project proposes
less than 24% impervious coverage.)
• Our current stream crossing design, including a concrete channel, a 54"RCP culvert, headwalls, wingwalls,
grading, and outlet riprap; plus an additional 5' on each end as room for construction, affect 149' of existing
stream centerline length. Our stream crossing. application has been revised to reflect this.

Page 2
John Dorney's letter of May 1, 2002, addressed four conditions. Please consider how those conditions are
affected by the latest revisions:
1. We should no longer have to mitigate, as specified in John's Condition # 1. We are proposing to impact less
than the 150' stream length limit.
2. As we discussed with Todd St. John's, a stormwater management plan for 85% TSS removal and stormwater
BMP's is not required by DWQ for this project. This pertains to John's Condition #2.
3. John's Condition #3 will be adhered to.
4. John's Condition #4 will be adhered to.
Bob, thank you for your assistance with Eno Forest Subdivision. Please notify me of DWQ approval of this
submittal, and sent me a copy of the approved stream crossing application.
Sincerely,
SEAR-BROWN
Stephen Ballentine, PE
Copy: Patricia Manson
File: L:\Jobs\00208\Documents\L06.DOC
Office Use Only: Form Version April 2001
USACE Action ID No. DWQ No.
If any particular item is not applicable to this project, please enter "Not Applicable" or "N/A" rather than
leaving the space blank.
1. Processing
1. Check all of the approval(s) requested for this project:
? Section 404 Permit
? Section 10 Permit
® 401 Water Quality Certification
? Riparian or Watershed Buffer Rules
2. Nationwide, Regional or General Permit Number(s) Requested: 39
3. If this notification is solely a courtesy copy because written approval for the 401 Certification
is not required, check here: ?
4. If payment into the North Carolina Wetlands Restoration Program (NCWRP) is proposed for
mitigation of impacts (see section VIII - Mitigation), check here: ?
II. Applicant Information
1. Owner/Applicant Information
Name: The Manson Company Inc
Mailing Address: 21 Stoneridge Circle Durham NC 27705
Telephone Number: (919).489-2862 Fax Number:
E-mail Address:
2. Agent Information (A signed and dated copy of the Agent Authorization letter must be
attached if the Agent has signatory authority for the owner/applicant.)
Name:
Company Affiliation:
Mailing Address:
Telephone Number: Fax Number:
E-mail Address:
Page 3 of 12
III. Project Information
2
Attach a vicinity map clearly, showing the location of the property with respect to local
landmarks such as towns, rivers, and roads. Also provide a detailed site plan showing property
boundaries and development plans in relation to surrounding properties. Both the vicinity map
and site plan must include a scale and north arrow. The specific footprints of all buildings,
impervious surfaces, or other facilities must be included. If possible, the maps and plans should
include the appropriate USGS Topographic Quad Map and NRCS Soil Survey with the property
boundaries outlined. Plan drawings, or other maps may be included at the applicant's discretion,
so long as the property is clearly defined. For administrative and distribution purposes, the
USACE requires information to be submitted on sheets no larger than 11 by 17-inch format;
however, DWQ may accept paperwork of any size. DWQ prefers full-size construction
drawings rather than a sequential sheet version of the full-size plans. If full-size plans are
reduced to a small scale such that the final version is illegible, the applicant will be informed that
the project has been placed on hold until decipherable maps are provided.
1. Name of project: V. Rage 2s'Eno ENo F oce s T
T.I.P. Project Number (NCDOT Only): NA
3. Property Identification Number (Tax PIN): 0814-04-84-7223 & 0814-04-84-8730
4. Location
County: Durham Nearest Town: Durham
no 'Ei"I _ Oo mss
Subdivision name (include phase/lot number): y4gammyrr
Directions to site (include road numbers, landmarks, etc.):
4213 Guess Road (SR 1003) Durham, NC 27712
5. Site coordinates, if available (UTM or Lat/Long): NA
(Note - If project is linear, such as a road or utility line, attach a sheet that separately lists the
coordinates for each crossing of a distinct waterbody.)
6. Describe the existing land use or condition of the site at the time of this application:
Wooded with residential use
7. Property size (acres): 30.34
8. Nearest body of water (stream/river/sound/ocean/lake): Eno River
9. River Basin: Neuse River
(Note - this must be one of North Carolina's seventeen designated major river basins. The
River Basin map is available at http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/admin/maps/.)
Page 4 of 12
10. Describe the purpose of the proposed work: Road construction.
11. List the type of equipment to be used to construct the project:
Grading and paying equipment.
12. Describe the land use in the vicinity of this project: Residential uses and a state park.
IV. Prior Project History
If jurisdictional determinations and/or permits have been requested and/or obtained for this
project (including all prior phases of the same subdivision) in the past, please explain. Include
the USACE Action ID Number, DWQ Project Number, application date, and date permits and
certifications were issued or withdrawn. Provide photocopies of previously issued permits,
certifications or other useful information. Describe previously approved wetland, stream and
buffer impacts, along with associated mitigation (where applicable). If this is a NCDOT project,
list and describe permits issued for prior segments of the same T.I.P. project, along with
construction schedules.
Important stream evaluation was performed 8/7/01. See attachment.
USACE ACTION ID: 2001121300
V. Future Project Plans
Are any additional permit requests anticipated for this project in the future? If so, describe the
anticipated work, and provide justification for the exclusion of this work from the current
application: No.
VI. Proposed Impacts to Waters of the United States/Waters of the State
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
wetlands, open water, and stream channels associated with the project. The applicant must also
provide justification for these impacts in Section VII below. All proposed impacts, permanent
and temporary, must be listed herein, and must be clearly identifiable on an accompanying site
plan. All wetlands and waters, and all streams (intermittent and perennial) must be shown on a
delineation map, whether or not impacts are proposed to these systems. Wetland and stream
evaluation and delineation forms should be included as appropriate. Photographs may be
included at the applicant's discretion. If this proposed impact is strictly for wetland or stream
mitigation, list and describe the impact in Section VIII below. If additional space is needed for
listing or description, please attach a separate sheet.
Page 5 of 12
1. Wetland Impacts
Wetland Impact
Site Number
(indicate on ma)
Type of Impact* Area of
Impact
(acres) Located within
100-year Floodplain**
(yes/no) Distance to
Nearest Stream
(linear feet)
Type of Wetland***

* List each impact separately and identify temporary impacts. Impacts include, but are not limited to: mechanized clearing, grading, fill,
excavation, flooding, ditching/drainage, etc. For dams, separately list impacts due to both structure and flooding.
** 100-Year floodplains are identified through the Federal Emergency Management Agency's (FEMA) Flood Insurance Rate Maps
(FIRM), or FEMA-approved local floodplain maps. Maps are available through the FEMA Map Service Center at 1-800-358-9616, or
online at htty://www.fema.gov.
*** List a wetland type that best describes wetland to be impacted (e.g., freshwater/saltwater marsh, forested wetland, beaver pond,
Carolina Bay, bog, etc.)
List the total acreage (estimated) of existing wetlands on the property: NA.
Total area of wetland impact proposed:
2. Stream Impacts, including all intermittent and perennial streams
Stream Impact
Site Number
(indicate on ma)
Type of Impact* Length of
Impact
(linear feet)
Stream Name** Average Width
of Stream
Before Impact Perennial or
Intermittent?
(please specify)
1 Culvert 149 UT - Eno River 6' Perennial

* List each impact separately and identify temporary impacts. Impacts include, but are not limited to: culverts and associated rip-rap,
dams (separately list impacts due to both structure and flooding), relocation (include linear feet before and after, and net loss/gain),
stabilization activities (cement wall, rip-rap, crib wall, gabions, etc.), excavation, ditching/straightening, etc. If stream relocation is
proposed, plans and profiles showing the linear footprint for both the original and relocated streams must be included.
** Stream names can be found on USGS topographic maps. If a stream has no name, list as UT (unnamed tributary) to the nearest
downstream named stream into which it flows. USGS maps are available through the USGS at 1-800-358-9616, or online at
www.usQs.gov. Several intemet sites also allow direct download and printing of USGS maps (e.g., www.topozone.com,
www.mayguest.com, etc.).
Cumulative impacts (linear distance in feet) to all streams on site: 149
Page 6 of 12
3. Open Water Impacts, including Lakes, Ponds, Estuaries, Sounds, Atlantic Ocean and any
other Water of the U.S.
Open Water Impact

Site Number
indicate on ma

Type of Impact* Area of

Impact
(acres)
Name of Waterbody
(if applicable) Type of Waterbody

(lake, pond, estuary, sound,
bay, ocean, etc.

* List each impact separately and identify temporary impacts. Impacts include, but are not 1i Yea to: fill, excavation, dredging,
flooding, drainage, bulkheads, etc.
4. Pond Creation
If construction of a pond is proposed, associated wetland and stream impacts should be
included above in the wetland and stream impact sections. Also, the proposed pond should
be described here and illustrated on any maps included with this application.
Pond to be created in (check all that apply): M uplands ? stream ? wetlands
Describe the method of construction (e.g., dam/embankment, excavation, installation of
draw-down valve or spillway, etc.): Dam/embankment excavation, and installation of
spillways -
Proposed use or purpose of pond (e.g., livestock watering, irrigation, aesthetic, trout pond,
local stormwater requirement, etc.): Local stormwater requirement.
Size of watershed draining to pond: (00.7 ac • (2)7.1 ac., (3)3.8 ac.• (4)8.6 ac.; (5)-25.5 ac.
Expected pond surface area: (,1)962 sf, (2)2 201 sf, (3)4 244 sf, (M5,578 sf; (5)5,967 sf
VII. Impact Justification (Avoidance and Minimization)
Specifically describe measures taken to avoid the proposed impacts. It may be useful to provide
information related to site constraints such as topography, building ordinances, accessibility, and
financial viability of the project. The applicant may attach drawings of alternative, lower-impact
site layouts, and explain why these design options were not feasible. Also discuss how impacts
were minimized once the desired site plan was developed. If applicable, discuss construction
techniques to be followed during construction to reduce impacts.
Crossing the stream is the only way to access that portion of the property.
Page 7 of 12
VIII. Mitigation
DWQ - In accordance with 15A NCAC 2H .0500, mitigation may be required by the NC
Division of Water Quality for projects involving greater than or equal to one acre of impacts to
freshwater wetlands or greater than or equal to 150 linear feet of total impacts to perennial
streams.
USACE - In accordance with the Final Notice of Issuance and Modification of Nationwide
Permits, published in the Federal Register on March 9, 2000, mitigation will be required when
necessary to ensure that adverse effects to the aquatic environment are minimal. Factors
including size and type of proposed impact and function and relative value of the impacted
aquatic resource will be considered in determining acceptability of appropriate and practicable
mitigation as proposed. Examples of mitigation that may be appropriate and practicable include,
but are not limited to: reducing the size of the project; establishing and maintaining wetland
and/or upland vegetated buffers to protect open waters such as streams; and replacing losses of
aquatic resource functions and values by creating, restoring, enhancing, or preserving similar
functions and values, preferable in the same watershed.
If mitigation is required for this project, a copy of the mitigation plan must be attached in order
for USACE or DWQ to consider the application complete for processing. Any application
lacking a required mitigation plan or NCWRP concurrence shall be placed on hold as
incomplete. An applicant may also choose to review the current guidelines for stream restoration
in DWQ's Draft Technical Guide. for Stream Work in North Carolina, available at
htlp://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands/strmgide.html.
Provide a brief description of the proposed mitigation plan. The description should provide
as much information as possible, including, but not limited to: site location (attach directions
and/or map, if offsite), affected stream and river basin, type and amount (acreage/linear feet)
of mitigation proposed (restoration, enhancement, creation, or preservation), a plan view,
preservation mechanism (e.g., deed restrictions, conservation easement, etc.), and a
description of the current site conditions and proposed method of construction. Please attach
a separate sheet if more space is needed.
NA.
Page 8 of 12
2. Mitigation may also be made by payment into the North Carolina Wetlands Restoration
Program (NCWRP) with the NCWRP's written agreement. Check the box indicating that
you would like to pay into the NCWRP. Please note that payment into the NCWRP must be
reviewed and approved before it can be used to satisfy mitigation requirements. Applicants
will be notified early in the review process by the 401/Wetlands Unit if payment into the
NCWRP is available as an. option. For additional information regarding the application
process for the NCWRP, check the NCWRP website at h=://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/wrp/index.htnL If
use of the NCWRP is proposed, please check the appropriate box on page three and provide
the following information:
Amount of stream mitigation requested (linear feet): NA.
Amount of buffer mitigation requested (square feet): NA:
Amount of Riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres): NA.
Amount of Non-riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres): NA.
Amount of Coastal wetland mitigation requested (acres): NA.
IX. Environmental Documentation (DWQ Only)
Does the project involve an expenditure of public funds or the use of public (federal/state/local)
land?
Yes ? No
If yes, does the project require preparation of an environmental document pursuant to the
requirements of the National or North Carolina Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
Note: If you are not sure whether a NEPA/SEPA document is required, call the SEPA
coordinator at [phone] to review current thresholds for environmental documentation.
Yes ? No ?
If yes, has the document review been finalized by the State Clearinghouse? If so, please attach a
copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval letter.
Yes ? No ?
X. Proposed Impacts on Riparian and Watershed Buffers (DWQ Only)
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
required state and local buffers associated with the project. The applicant must also provide
justification for these impacts in Section VII above. All proposed impacts must be listed herein,
and must be clearly identifiable on the accompanying site plan. All buffers must be shown on a
map, whether or not impacts are proposed to the buffers. Correspondence from the DWQ
Regional Office may be included as appropriate. Photographs may also be included at the
applicant's discretion.
Will the project impact protected riparian buffers identified within 15A NCAC 2B .0233
(Meuse), 15A NCAC 2B .0259 (Tar-Pamlico), 15A NCAC 2B .0250 (Randleman Rules and
Water Supply Buffer Requirements), or other (please identify )?
Yes ® No ? If you answered "yes", provide the following information:
Page 9 of 12
Yes ® No ? If you answered "yes", provide the following information:
Identify the square feet and acreage of impact to each zone of the riparian buffers. If buffer
mitigation is required calculate the required amount of mitigation by applying the buffer
multipliers. Required
Zone* (square afeet Multiplier Mitigation
1 8,734 3
2 5,609 1.5
Total 14,343
{ Gone 1 extends out su teet perpenaicular nom near tianK of channel; zone 2 extends an
additional 20 feet from the edge of Zone 1.
If buffer mitigation is required, please discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (i.e., Donation
of Property, Conservation Easement, Riparian Buffer Restoration / Enhancement, Preservation or
Payment into the Riparian Buffer Restoration Fund). Please attach all appropriate information as
identified within 15A NCAC 2B .0242 or .0260.
NA.
M. Stormwater (DWQ Only)
Describe impervious acreage (both existing and proposed) versus total acreage on the site.
Discuss stormwater controls proposed in order to protect surface waters and wetlands
downstream from the property.
The existinpimpervious surface is 2.59%. The proposed maximum impervious surface is 24%.
Rip-rap will be used at all outlets. Level spreaders will be used at all detention ponds.
XII. Sewage Disposal (DWQ Only)
Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of
wastewater generated from the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
The wastewater generated by the proposed project will be pumped away from the site.
XIII. Violations (DWQ Only)
Is this site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500) or any Buffer Rules?
Yes ? No Z
Is this an after-the-fact permit application?
Page 10 of 12
Yes ? No
XIV. Other Circumstances (Optional):
It is the applicant's responsibility to submit the application sufficiently in advance of desired
construction dates to allow processing time for these permits. However, an applicant may
choose to list constraints associated with construction or sequencing that may impose limits on
work schedules (e.g., draw-down schedules for lakes, dates associated with Endangered and
Threatened Species, accessibility problems, or other issues outside of the applicant's control).
NA.
r4L in/i/rSOA) ?m IJgA) 1, 1NC-
Applicant/Agent's Signature ate
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant is. provided.)
US Army Corps Of Engineers Field Offices and County Coverage
Asheville Regulatory Field Office Alexander Cherokee Iredell Mitchell
US Army Corps of Engineers Avery Clay Jackson Polk
151 Patton Avenue Buncombe Cleveland Lincoln Rowan
Room 208 Burke Gaston Macon Rutherford
Asheville, NC 28801-5006 Cabarrus Graham Madison Stanley
Telephone: [phone] Caldwell Haywood McDowell Swain
Fax: [phone] Catawba Henderson Mecklenburg Transylvania
Raleigh Regulatory Field Office Alamance Durham Johnston Rockingham
US Army Corps Of Engineers Alleghany Edgecombe Lee Stokes
6508 Falls of the Neuse Road Ashe Franklin Nash Surry
Suite 120 Caswell Forsyth Northampton Vance
Raleigh, NC 27615 Chatham Granville Orange Wake
Telephone: [phone] Davidson Guilford Person Warren
Fax: [phone] Davie Halifax Randolph Wilkes
Washington Regulatory Field Office Beaufort Currituck Jones
US Army Corps Of Engineers Bertie Dare Lenoir
Post Office Box 1000 Camden Gates Martin
Washington, NC 27889-1000 Carteret* Green Pamlico
Telephone: [phone] Chowan Hertford Pasquotank
Fax: [phone] Craven Hyde Perquimans
Wilmington Regulatory Field Office
US Army Corps Of Engineers
Post Office Box 1890
Wilmington, NC 28402-1890
Anson Duplin Onslow
Bladen Harnett Pender
Brunswick Hoke- Richmond
Carteret Montgomery Robeson
Pitt
Tyrrell
Washington
Wayne
Union
Watauga
Yancey
Wilson
Yadkin
*Croatan National Forest Only
Page 11 of 12
F ?N A TFq
O O QG
• ? r
y
o -c
Michael F. Easley
Governor
William G. Ross, Jr., Secretary
Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Gregory J. Thorpe, Ph.D., Acting Director
Division of Water Quality
May 1, 2002
DWQ Project # 01-1492
Durham County
Page 1 of 2
The Manson Company, Inc.
Ms. Patricia S. Manson
21 Stoneridge Circle
Durham, NC 27705
Subject Property: Eno Forest Subdivision (formerly Village by the Eno), 4213 Guess Rd. (SR1003), Durham
PIN No. 0814-04-84-7223 & 0814-04-84-8730; 30.34 acres
USACE Action ID No. 2001121300
Unnamed tributary streams to the Eno River [03-04-01,.27-2-(10), WS-1V & B NSW]
APPROVAL of 401 Water Quality Certification and Authorization Certificate per the Neuse River Buffer
Protection Rules (15A NCAC 2B.0233) with ADDITIONAL CONDITIONS
Dear Ms. Manson:
You have our approval, in accordance with the attached conditions and those listed below, to impact 150 feet of
perennial stream and 13,736 square feet of riparian buffers to construct the proposed road crossing at the subject property
as described within your application dated April 19, 2002. After reviewing your application, we have determined that this
fill is covered by the Division of Water Quality (DWQ) General Water Quality Certification. Number 3362. This
Certification allows you to use Nationwide Permit No. 39 when issued by the US Army Corps of Engineers (USACE).
This letter shall also act as your approved Authorization Certificate for impacts to the protected Neuse riparian buffers as
required under 15A NCAC 2B .0233(8). In addition, you should get or otherwise comply with any other federal, state and
local requirements before you go ahead with your project including (but not limited to) Erosion and Sediment Control
Permit. Also, this approval will expire when the accompanying 404 permit expires unless otherwise specified in the
General Certification.
This approval is only valid for the purpose and design that you described in your application except as modified
below. If you change your project, you must notify us and you may be required to send us a new application. If the
property is sold, the new owner must be given a copy of this Certification and approval letter and is thereby responsible
for complying with all conditions. If total fills for this project (now or in the future) exceed one acre of wetland or 150
feet stream, compensatory mitigation may be required as described in 15A NCAC 2H.0506 (h). For this approval to be
valid, you must follow the conditions listed in the DWQ General Water Quality Certification No. 3362 and any additional
conditions listed below.
Conditions:
1. You are required to mitigate for the stream impacts. The length of stream mitigation required to compensate for the
impacts shall be 150 feet as required under this Certification, 15A NCAC 211.0506 (h) and DWQ General Water
Quality Certification No. 3362. You are required to submit to and have approved by the DWQ a stream mitigation
plan that satisfies this mitigation condition prior to impacting any surface waters approved under this Certification.
2. A final, written stormwater management plan shall be approved in writing by this Office before the impacts specified
in this Certification and Authorization Certificate shall occur. The stormwater management plan must include plans
and specifications for stormwater management facilities designed to remove 85% TSS according to the most recent
North Carolina Division of Water Quality, 401 Wetlands Certification Unit, R C _ j/ ' -L U2
1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1650 (Mailing Address) 2 J ??
2321 Crabtree Blvd., Raleigh, NC 27604-2260 (Location)
919-733-1786 (phone), 919-733-6893 (fax), http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands/
version of the NC DENR Stormwater Best Management Practices Manual. These facilities must be designed .
to ,
the runoff from the entire project, unless otherwise explicitly approved by the Division of Water Quality (DWQ).
Stormwater shall be directed to flow in a diffuse manner at non-erosive velocities through the entire protected streans,_
buffers without re-concentrating, unless otherwise approved by the DWQ. The plan shall specify all stormwater
discharge points, plan details, and calculations to indicate that diffuse flow through the protected buffers as described
above will be achieved. Also, before any permanent building is occupied at the subject site, the facilities (as approved
by this Office) shall be constructed and operational, and the stormwater management plan (as approved by this Office)
shall be implemented. The structural stormwater practices as approved by this Office as well as drainage patterns must
be maintained in perpetuity. No changes to the structural stormwater practices shall be made without written
authorization from the Division of Water Quality.
3. Deed notifications or similar mechanisms shall be placed on all retained jurisdictional wetlands, waters and protective
buffers in order to assure compliance for future wetland, water and buffer impact. These mechanisms shall be put in
place prior to impacting any wetlands, waters and/or buffers approved for-impact under this Certification Approval
and Authorization Certificate.
4. Upon completion of all work approved within the 401 Water Quality Certification or applicable Buffer Rules, and any
subsequent modifications, the applicant is required to return the attached certificate of completion to the 401/Wetlands
Unit, North Carolina Division of Water Quality, 1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC, 27699-1650.
If you do not accept any of the conditions of this certification, you may ask for an adjudicatory hearing. You must act
within 60 days of the date that you receive this letter. To ask for a hearing, send a written petition, which conforms to
Chapter 150B of the North Carolina General Statutes to the Office of Administrative Hearings, 6714 Mail Service Center,
Raleigh, NC 27699-6714. This certification and its conditions are final and binding unless you ask for a hearing.
This letter completes the review of the Division of Water Quality under Section 401 of the Clean Water Act. If you
have any questions, please telephone Mr. John Dorney at 919-733-9646.
Sincerely,
J. Thorpe, Ph.D.
Z, Acting Direct
Attachment: General Water Quality Certification No. 3362
DWQ Certificate of Completion
Cc: Lynnise Hawes, Sear-Brown, 1000 Corporate Drive, Hillsborough, NC 27278
Steve Mitchell, DWQ Raleigh Regional Office
Todd Tugwell, USACE Raleigh Regulatory Field Office, 6508 Falls of Neuse Road, Suite 120, Raleigh, NC 27615
File Copy
Central Files
DWQ 011492
WAT?9QG
r
Michael F. Easley
Governor
William G. Ross, Jr., Secretary
Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Q `C Gregory J. Thorpe, Ph.D., Acting Director
Division of Water Quality
May 1, 2002
DWQ Project # 01-1492
Durham County
Page 1 of 2
The Manson Company, Inc.
Ms. Patricia S. Manson
21 Stoneridge Circle
Durham, NC 27705
Subject Property: Eno Forest Subdivision (formerly Village by the Eno), 4213 Guess Rd. (SR1003), Durham
PIN No. 0814-04-84-7223 & 0814-04-84-8730; 30.34 acres
USACE Action ID No. 2001121300
Unnamed tributary streams to the Eno River [03-04-01, 27-2-(10), WS-IV & B NSW]
APPROVAL of 401 Water Quality Certification and Authorization Certificate per the Neuse River Buffer
Protection Rules (15A NCAC 2B.0233) with ADDITIONAL CONDITIONS
Dear Ms. Manson:
You have our approval, in accordance with the attached conditions and those listed below, to impact 150 feet of
perennial stream and 13,736 square feet of riparian buffers to construct the proposed road crossing at the subject property
as described within your application dated April 19, 2002. After reviewing your application, we have determined that this
fill is covered by the Division of Water Quality (DWQ) General Water Quality Certification Number 3362. This
Certification allows you to use Nationwide Permit No. 39 when issued by the US Army Corps of Engineers (USACE).
This letter shall also act as your approved Authorization Certificate for impacts to the protected Neuse riparian buffers as
required under 15A NCAC 213 .0233(8). In addition, you should get or otherwise comply with any other federal, state and
local requirements before you go ahead with your project including (but not limited to) Erosion and Sediment Control
Permit. Also, this approval will expire when the accompanying 404 permit expires unless otherwise specified in the
General Certification.
This approval is only valid for the purpose and design that you described in your application except as modified
below. If you change your project, you must notify us and you may be required to send us a new application. If the
property is sold, the new owner must be given a copy of this Certification and approval letter and is thereby responsible
for complying with all conditions. If total fills for this project (now or in the future) exceed one acre of wetland or 150
feet stream, compensatory mitigation may be required as described in 15A NCAC 2H.0506 (h). For this approval to be
valid, you must follow the conditions listed in the DWQ General Water Quality Certification No. 3362 and any additional
conditions listed below.
Conditions:
1. You are required to mitigate for the stream impacts. The length of stream mitigation required to compensate for the
impacts shall be 150 feet as required under this Certification, 15A NCAC 2H.0506 (h) and DWQ General Water
Quality Certification No. 3362. You are required to submit to and have approved by the DWQ a stream mitigation
plan that satisfies this mitigation condition prior to impacting any surface waters approved under this Certification.
2. A final, written stormwater management plan shall be approved in writing by this Office before the impacts specified
in this Certification and Authorization Certificate shall occur. The stormwater management plan must include plans
and specifications for stormwater management facilities designed to remove 85% TSS according to the most recent
North Carolina Division of Water Quality, 401 Wetlands Certification Unit,
1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1650 (Mailing Address)
2321 Crabtree Blvd., Raleigh, NC 27604-2260 (Location)
919-733-1786 (phone), 919-733-6893 (fax), hftp://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetiands/
Page 2 of 2
version of the NC DENR Stormwater Best Management Practices Manual. These facilities must be designed to treat
the runoff from the entire project, unless otherwise explicitly approved by the Division of Water Quality (DWQ).
Stormwater shall be directed to flow in a diffuse manner at non-erosive velocities through the entire protected stream
buffers without re-concentrating, unless otherwise approved by the DWQ. The plan shall specify all stormwater
discharge points, plan details, and calculations to indicate that diffuse flow through the protected buffers as described
above will be achieved. Also, before any permanent building is occupied at the subject site, the facilities (as approved
by this Office) shall be constructed and operational, and the stormwater management plan (as approved by this Office)
shall be implemented. The structural stormwater practices as approved by this Office as well as drainage patterns must
be maintained in perpetuity. No changes to the structural stormwater practices shall be made without written
authorization from the Division of Water Quality.
3. Deed notifications or similar mechanisms shall be placed on all retained jurisdictional wetlands, waters and protective
buffers in order to assure compliance for future wetland, water and buffer impact. These mechanisms shall be put in
place prior to impacting any wetlands, waters and/or buffers approved for impact under this Certification Approval
and Authorization Certificate.
4. Upon completion of all work approved within the 401 Water Quality Certification or applicable Buffer Rules, and any
subsequent modifications, the applicant is required to return the attached certificate of completion to the 401/Wetlands
Unit, North Carolina Division of Water Quality, 1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC, 27699-1650.
If you do not accept any of the conditions of this certification, you may ask for an adjudicatory hearing. You must act
within 60 days of the date that you receive this letter. To ask for a hearing, send a written petition, which conforms to
Chapter 150B of the North Carolina General Statutes to the Office of Administrative Hearings, 6714 Mail Service Center,
Raleigh, NC 27699-6714. This certification and its conditions are final and binding unless you ask for a hearing.
This letter completes the review of the Division of Water Quality under Section 401 of the Clean Water Act. If you
have any questions, please telephone Mr. John Dorney at 919-733-9646.
Sincerely,
J. Thorpe, Ph.D.
Acting Direct
c(T.,
Attachment: General Water Quality Certification No. 3362
DWQ Certificate of Completion
Cc: Lynnise Hawes, Sear-Brown, 1000 Corporate Drive, Hillsborough, NC 27278
Steve Mitchell, DWQ Raleigh Regional Office
Todd Tugwell, USACF -- - :e, 6508 Falls of Neuse Road, Suite 120, Raleigh, NC 27615
File Copy
Central Files
DWQ 011492

Re: [Fwd: Eno Forest Subdivision]
..'.
Subject: Re: [Fwd: Eno Forest Subdivision] G
Date: Mon, 03 Jun 2002 13:42:42 -0400 ?`
From: Bob Zarzecki <[e-mail]>
Organization: Division of Water Quality; 401 Certification Unit
To: Deborah Edwards <[e-mail]>, tow
Danny Smith <[e-mail]>
Debbie:
We need to know if this is the same feature or not before I can issue the 401 / buffer
days from that date, but I would like to get this taken care of before I leave for vac;
is for you to contact the engineer and see if he can provide you additional maps indic;
- Bob
Deborah Edwards wrote:
> Bob,
> I know this response is late but I just got my computer up and running, complete cra
> area next to the Eno River, I later noticed that the feature extended farther south .
> if you have any Q's, please email me back.
> Deb
> Bob Zarzecki wrote:
> > Debbie:
> > is this the same feature that is indicated on their site map that I
> > faxed you?
> > - Bob
> > PS...Danny says Hi!
---------------------------------------
> > Subject: Re: Eno Forest Subdivision
> > Date: Tue., 28 May 2002 16:11:31 -0400
> > From: Bob Zarzecki <[e-mail]>
> > Organization: Division of Water Quality; 401 Certification Unit
> > To: "Ballentine, Stephen" <[e-mail]>
> > CC: "Debbie Edwards (RRO) " <[e-mail]>
> > References: <[e-mail]>
> > Stephen:
> > I received Ms. Edward's letter. Thanks for faxing it over. I'll write the approv,
> > - Bob
> > "Ballentine, Stephen" wrote:
> > > Hi Bob,
> > > Yes, we have received a letter from Debbie Edwards of DWO, in which she confirms
> > > Thanks,
> > > Stephen
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Bob Zarzecki [mail to: bob. [e-mail]: ]
> > > Sent: Tuesday, May 28, 2002 2:17 PM
> > > To: Ballentine, Stephen
> > > Subject: Re: Eno Forest Subdivision th
> > > Stephen:
> > > We have received the information and are prepared to issue the project. Have you
> > > - Bob
1 of 3 6/3/02 1:43 PT
Re: [Fwd: Eno Forest Subdivision]
> > > "Bq,?1 en t ifi t e4 A", wro t e
> > > 4
> > > > Hi jyafi
> > > >
> > > > I maileackage for Eno Forest two weeks ago. It contains revised draw
> > > > Regards,
> > > > Stephen
> > > > SEAR BROWN
> > > > Stephen Ballentine, P.E.
> > > > Professional Engineer
> > > > Land Development
> > > > 1000 Corporate Drive
> > > > Suite 101
> > > > Hillsborough, NC 27278
> > > > Phone: [phone]
> > > > Fax: [phone]
> > > > [e-mail]
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: Bob Zarzecki [mailto:[e-mail]]
> > > > Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2002 10:01 AM
> > > > To: Ballentine, Stephen
> > > > Cc: Todd St. John
> > > > Subject: Detention No. 4
> > > > Stephen:
> > > > What you proposed on your voice mail message sounds reasonable. Devil
> > > > is always in the details, but I would go ahead an submit as proposed.
> > > > Todd will conduct the stormwater plan review, so any detailed questions
> > > > should go his way. I sent Debbie an email to try and get you written
> > > > confirmation as soon as possible. You can reach her at 919-571-4700 ext.
> > > > 245 if you want to make sure that she has everything that she needs.
> > > > Look forward to your revised plan.
> > > > - Bob
---------------------------
---------------------------------------------
> > Bob Zarzecki
> > NC DENR/DWQ 401 Wetlands Certification Unit
> > 919-733-9726
> > Bob Zarzecki
> > NC DENR/DWQ 401 Wetlands Certification Unit
> > 919-733-9726
> > 2321 Crabtree Blvd (office address) 1650 Mail Service Center (mail address) Fa.
> > Raleigh Wo_
> > NC
> > 27669-1650
> > Additional information:
> > Version 2.1
--------------------------------------------
> > Bob Zarzecki
> > NC DENR/DWQ 401 Wetlands Certification Unit
> > 919-733-9726
2 of 3 6/3/02 1:43 PM
Re: [Fwd: Eno Forest Subdivision)
.? w
> > Bob Zarzecki
> > NC DENR/D[Qf 401 Wetlands Certification Unit
> > 919-733-9726
> > 2321 Crabtree Blvd (office address) 1650 Mail Service Center (mail address) Fa.
> > Raleigh IVo.
> > NC
> > 27669-1650
> > Additional Information:
> > Version 2.1
Bob Zarzecki
NC DENR/DWQ 401 Wetlands Certification Unit
919-733-9726
3 of 3 6/3/02 1:43 PN
May 29 02 02:34a
. r
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Raleigh Regional Office
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. (Bill) Ross, Secretary E,,,,"R
Division of Water Quality
May 16, 2002
Tim Morris
SEAR-BROWN
1000 Corporate Drive, Suite 101
Hillsborough, NC 27278
p.1
?-e OM
-iss (?s93
2 S??s
Subject: Neuse River Basin Buffer Rules
NBRRO 02-106
Eno Forest
Durham, Durham County, NC
Dear Mr. Morris:
On March 4, 2002, I conducted a site visit of the feature involved in the above referenced
project as identified on the attached maps. It was determined that this feature shown on the
Durham County Soil Survey, but absent on the USGS Northwest Durham, NC Quad map is
subject to protection under the Neuse River Basin: Nutrient Sensitive Waters Management
Strategy; Protection and Maintenance of Existing Riparian Areas, Administrative Code T15A:
02B.0233 (NCAC .0233). There are 2 features located within the Property Boundaries at this
site, however the only feature that received a field determination was the feature located closest
to Guess Road and only at the lower end, closest to the Eno River. This end of the feature was
determined to be not subject. The higher portion of this feature along with the feature running
south to north through the middle of the property has not received a field determination from the
Division of Water Quality.
This letter only addresses the applicability of the Neuse Buffer Rules. For information
relevant to wetlands and other impacts, please contact the Central Office at 733-1786. Thank you
for your attention to this matter and if this office can be of any assistance or if you have additional
questions, please do not hesitate to contact us.
Sincerely,
Deborah Edwards
Environmental Specialist I
cc: John Dorney/DWQ
Durham County
1628 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1628 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/10% post-consumer paper
May 29 02 02:34a p•2

Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Gregory J. Thorpe, Ph.D.
Acting Director
Division of Water Quality
Division of Water Quality
Department of Environmental and Natural Resources
Wetlands/401 Unit
Street Address: 2321 Crabtree Boulevard, Suite 250
Raleigh, NC 27604-2260
Mailing Address: 1650 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1650
Contact Information: Phone #: [phone]
Fax #: [phone]
Fax To: T")ebbl-r_
Company: 9?0
Number of pages including cover sheet: 2
Notes or special instructions:
Fax #: 57:t I _y -?j b
Date: 6-1 IZa )o 2
Eno 6-0')
a =7
SX-b ENRR
N. C. Division of Water Quality, 401 Wetlands Certification Unit,
1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1650 (Mailing Address)
2321 Crabtree Blvd., Raleigh, NC 27604-2260 (Location)
[phone] (phone), 919-733-6893 (fax), (http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands
30'AM
SEWER
+?v
"A'. \ F
CURVE 2 ?1
1 10-00-47 /
R 181.00' Q
LOT 2
21,566 SF
15
L - 31.83' END TAPER
STA. 13+32.11 Y 1 6/
Dc 31-39-18 / QO ?p0 OFFSET: 12.00 R LO",
LOT 45 61,61
\15,011 SF//o ?? ??• ti? // \\ o \\
CA\ / A Bp /BEGIN TAPER \ h
STA: 12+88.37 \ \
ROPOSED OFFSET. 17'00 R \ \
SIDEWALK 4, / / \ \ `SO• \
X\ ?G 4 LOT 1 \
SF
44oQo \ \ \ ?9??s
X10' x 70' POSED \
SIGHT CITY STORM \
TRIANGLE DRAINAGE EASEMENT \
c (TYP.) \ \
LINE TABLE
LINE BEARING LENGTH
L1 11'1 4'
L2 N30*54'11*E 38,87'
L3 7" 1
L4 '4 31,08'
L5 N71*54'00*W 30,90'
L6 S08*05'13"W 39,06'
L7 7 7
L8 7'
L9 1
L10 7' 17'
L11 1
L12 7' 1
L13 7' 4
L14 S20*27'36"E 34,09'
L75 N26-24'50*E 39,36'
L16 '1 1
L17 N30*20'33"W 50,00'
L18 '4 ' 5,13'
1-19 S71'42'05"W 20,80'
L20 40 W
I N3035 '
L22 7' 17'
L23 15,00' 1
0
295.
o• ? /tio
s? \ sF
C",
r --
\
CURVE TABLE
CURVE LENGTH RADIUS CHORD DIRECTION CHORD
C4 162.88
C5 63.61
C6 23.18
C7 52.94
C8 63.00
C9 51.00
C10 48.08
C11 34.79
C12 23.18
C13 146.24
C14 132.77
C15 39.27
C16 36.00
C17 49.90
C18 33.26
C19 63.36
C20 70.00
000001- CURVE TABLE
CURVE LENGTH RADIUS CHOF
C21 21.38 170.00 S
C77 81.76 170.00 S
1

37.

i.
',
i

.J
L?
(;
}
* .
-. h
? an
? ?y?
Y .
C
* .w
d'.
?'
•
!"
Eno Forest (Village by the Eno)01 1492
Subject: Eno Forest (Village by the Eno)011492
Date: Thu, 16 May 2002 09:46:36 -0400
From: Bob Zarzecki <bob.zarzecki @ncmail.net>
Organization: Division of Water Quality; 401 Certification Unit
To: Cyndi Karoly <[e-mail]>, "Todd St. John" <[e-mail]>,
"Debbie Edwards (RRO)" <[e-mail]>
Cyndi:
Todd and I spoke with Stephen Ballentine today regarding this project.
He plans to send in a revised application. He plans to reduce his
stream impacts associated with the road crossing to less than 150 feet
to avoid the stream mitigation. He also plans to revise his stormwater
plan to better provide diffuse flow prior to discharge per Todd and my
recommendations. He said that Debbie Edwards reviewed the small channel
near Guess Road and determined that it was not subject to the buffer
rules. He said the buffers shown on this channel are Durham / Eno River
Buffers (?) and not Neuse Buffers. I told him to provide written
documentation of the RRO's call in his revision. He said he was waiting
on a letter from the RRO. I made a copy of this email, put it in the
file and put the file back in the ISSUE cabinet.
Debbie: Please send Stephen a confirmation letter of your call as soon
as possible. Thanks.
Todd: Thanks for the help.
- Bob
r ............. _.._--.. -- -- _.__ . ......... _..._...... ......... _.......
_-__... - --
Bob Zarzecki
NC DENR/DWQ 401 Wetlands Certification Unit
919-733-9726
1 of 1 5/16/02 9:47 AN
Re: village by the eno; durham county; 0101492
Subject: Re: village by the eno; durham county; 0101492
Date: Mon, 29 Apr 2002 13:45:56 -0400
From: John Dorney <[e-mail]>
To: Bob Zarzecki <[e-mail]>
CC: Cyndi Karoly <[e-mail]>
thanks. leave it in the normal order in the stack. i'll call consultant and say
we have the information he sent and will be preparing approval but will NOT give
him a schedule.
Bob Zarzecki wrote:
> JD:
> Cyndi gave it to me to write up the approval letter last Weds. since it was a
> complicated buffer1401 project. It's on my pile to write. I was hoping to get
> to it today but it may be tomorrow or Thursday (unless you tell me to move it
> up in the stack).
> - Bob
> Cyndi Karoly wrote:
> > I think it went thru last week's triage. This is the one Dave and I
> > visited. They miraculously found a way to reduce stream impacts to 149
> > feet after we proved to them it was perennial. I'm not sure but I think we
> > recommended issuance on the revised version, rather than sending it back to
> > the RRO again. Possibly look for it in your signature box John.

> > John Dorney wrote:
> > > anyone know the whereabouts of this file? was on hold and they sent in
> > > additional information last week.thankx
1 of 1 4/29/02 '
SEAR• BROWN
April 22, 2002
Mr. John Dorney
NCDENR
Division of Water Quality
Wetlands/401 Unit
1650 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1650
Subject: Eno Forest Neuse Tributary Crossing
DWQ # 01-1492
Dear Mr. Dorney:
ARCHITECTURE
ENGINEERING
PLANNING
?y (III RUCTION
#k
1000 Corporate Drive
Hillsborough, NC 27278
919.732.3883 phone
919.732.6676 fax
www.searbrown.com
The following information is being provided in response to your letter:
• The stream crossing was revised to impact only 150-linear feet. This includes all inlet and outlet stream
stabilizations. The driveway access is no longer needed.
• The preliminary plat and the storm drainage and grading plan are attached.
• The revised application notes the stream as perennial.
Sincerely,
SEAR-BROWN
r?
Lynnise Hawes
File: L:\Jobs\00-208\DWQ-02.DOC
III. Project Information
LJ
t
a
Attach a vicinity map clearly showing the location of the property with respect to local
landmarks such as towns, rivers, and roads. Also provide a detailed site plan showing property
boundaries and development plans in relation to surrounding properties. Both the vicinity map
and site plan must include a scale and north arrow. The specific footprints of all buildings,
impervious surfaces, or other facilities must be included. If possible, the maps and plans should
include the appropriate USGS Topographic Quad Map and NRCS Soil Survey with the property
boundaries outlined. Plan drawings, or other maps may be included at the applicant's discretion,
so long as the property is clearly defined. For administrative and distribution purposes, the
USACE requires information to be submitted on sheets no larger than 11 by 17-inch format;
however, DWQ may accept paperwork of any size. DWQ prefers full-size construction
drawings rather than a sequential sheet version of the full-size plans. If full-size plans are
reduced to a small scale such that the final version is illegible, the applicant will be informed that
the project has been placed on hold until decipherable maps are provided.
1. Name of project: Eno Forest (formerly Village by the Eno
2. T.I.P. Project Number (NCDOT Only): NA
3. Property Identification Number (Tax PIN): 0814-04-84-7223 & 0814-04-84-8730
4. Location
County: Durham Nearest Town: Durham
Subdivision name (include phase/lot number): Eno Forest
Directions to site (include road numbers, landmarks, etc.):
4213_Guess _Road (SR 1003), Durham, NC 27712
5. Site coordinates, if available (UTM or Lat/Long): NA
(Note - If project is linear, such as a road or utility line, attach a sheet that separately lists the
coordinates for each crossing of a distinct waterbody.)
6. Describe the existing land use or condition of the site at the time of this application:
Wooded with residential use
7. Property size (acres): 30.34
8. Nearest body of water (stream/river/sound/ocean/lake): Eno River
9. River Basin: Neuse River
(Note - this must be one of North Carolina's seventeen designated major river basins. The
River Basin map is available at http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/admin/maps/.)
Page 4 of 12
Office Use Only: Form Version April 2001
USACE Action ID No. DWQ No.
If any particular item is not applicable to this project, please enter "Not Applicable" or "N/A" rather than
leaving the space blank.
1. Processing
1. Check all of the approval(s) requested for this project:
? Section 404 Permit
? Section 10 Permit
® 401 Water Quality Certification
® Riparian or Watershed Buffer Rules
2. Nationwide, Regional or General Permit Number(s) Requested:
39
3. If this notification is solely a courtesy copy because written approval for the 401 Certification
is not required, check here: ?
4. If payment into the North Carolina Wetlands Restoration Program (NCWRP) is proposed for
mitigation of impacts (see section VIII - Mitigation), check here: ?
II. Applicant Information
1. Owner/Applicant Information
Name: The Manson Company, Inc.
Mailing Address: 21 Stoneridge Circle, Durham, NC 27705
Telephone Number: [phone] Fax Number:
E-mail Address:
2. Agent Information (A signed and dated copy of the Agent Authorization letter must be
attached if the Agent has signatory authority for the owner/applicant.)
Name:
Company Affiliation:
Mailing Address:
Telephone Number:
E-mail Address:
Fax Number:
Page 3 of 12
III. Project Information
Attach a vicinity map clearly showing the location of the property with respect to local
landmarks such as towns, rivers, and roads. Also provide a detailed site plan showing property
boundaries and development plans in relation to surrounding properties. Both the vicinity map
and site plan must include a scale and north arrow. The specific footprints of all buildings,
impervious surfaces, or other facilities must be included. If possible, the maps and plans should
include the appropriate USGS Topographic Quad Map and NRCS Soil Survey with the property
boundaries outlined. Plan drawings, or other maps may be included at the applicant's discretion,
so long as the property is clearly defined. For administrative and distribution purposes, the
USACE requires information to be submitted on sheets no larger than 11 by 17-inch format;
however, DWQ may accept paperwork of any size. DWQ prefers full-size construction
drawings rather than a sequential sheet version of the full-size plans. If full-size plans are
reduced to a small scale such that the final version is illegible, the applicant will be informed that
the project has been placed on hold until decipherable maps are provided.
1. Name of project: Eno Forest (formerly Village by the Eno)
2. T.I.P. Project Number (NCDOT Only): NA
3. Property Identification Number (Tax PIN): 0814-04-84-7223 & 0814-04-84-8730
4. Location
County: Durham Nearest Town: Durham
Subdivision name (include phase/lot number): Eno Forest
Directions to site (include road numbers, landmarks, etc.):
4213 Guess Road (SR 1003), Durham, NC 27712
5. Site coordinates, if available (UTM or Lat/Long): NA
(Note - If project is linear, such as a road or utility line, attach a sheet that separately lists the
coordinates for each crossing of a distinct waterbody.)
6. Describe the existing land use or condition of the site at the time of this application:
Wooded with residential use
7. Property size (acres): 30.34
Nearest body of water (stream/river/sound/ocean/lake):
Eno River
9. River Basin: Neuse River
(Note - this must be one of North Carolina's seventeen designated major river basins. The
River Basin map is available at http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/admin/m4ps/.)
Page 4 of 12
10. Describe the purpose of the proposed work: Road construction.
11. List the type of equipment to be used to construct the project:
Grading and paving equipment.
12. Describe the land use in the vicinity of this project: Residential uses and a state park.
IV. Prior Project History
If jurisdictional determinations and/or permits have been requested and/or obtained for this
project (including all prior phases of the same subdivision) in the past, please explain. Include
the USACE Action ID Number, DWQ Project Number, application date, and date permits and
certifications were issued or withdrawn. Provide photocopies of previously issued permits,
certifications or other useful information. Describe previously approved wetland, stream and
buffer impacts, along with associated mitigation (where applicable). If this is a NCDOT project,
list and describe permits issued for prior segments of the same T.I.P. project, along with
construction schedules.
Important stream evaluation was performed 8/7/01. See attachment.
USACE ACTION ID: 2001121300
V. Future Project Plans
Are any additional permit requests anticipated for this project in the future? If so, describe the
anticipated work, and provide justification for the exclusion of this work from the current
application: No.
VI. Proposed Impacts to Waters of the United States/Waters of the State
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
wetlands, open water, and stream channels associated with the project. The applicant must also
provide justification for these impacts in Section VII below. All proposed impacts, permanent
and temporary, must be listed herein, and must be clearly identifiable on an accompanying site
plan. All wetlands and waters, and all streams (intermittent and perennial) must be shown on a
delineation map, whether or not impacts are proposed to these systems. Wetland and stream
evaluation and delineation forms should be included as appropriate. Photographs may be
included at the applicant's discretion. If this proposed impact is strictly for wetland or stream
mitigation, list and describe the impact in Section VIII below. If additional space is needed for
listing or description, please attach a separate sheet.
Page 5 of 12
1. Wetland Impacts
Wetland Impact
Site Number
(indicate on map)
Type of Impact* Area of
Impact
(acres) Located within
100-year Floodplain**
(yes/no) Distance to
Nearest Stream
(linear feet)
Type of Wetland***

* List each impact separately and identify temporary impacts. Impacts include, but are not limited to: mechanized clearing, grading, fill,
excavation, flooding, ditching/drainage, etc. For dams, separately list impacts due to both structure and flooding.
** 100-Year floodplains are identified through the Federal Emergency Management Agency's (FEMA) Flood Insurance Rate Maps
(FIRM), or FEMA-approved local floodplain maps. Maps are available through the FEMA Map Service Center at 1-800-358-9616, or
online at http://www.fema.gov.
*** List a wetland type that best describes wetland to be impacted (e.g., freshwater/saltwater marsh, forested wetland, beaver pond,
Carolina Bay, bog, etc.)
List the total acreage (estimated) of existing wetlands on the property: NA.
Total area of wetland impact proposed:
2. Stream Impacts, including all intermittent and perennial streams
Stream Impact
Site Number
(indicate on map)
Type of Impact* Length of
Impact
(linear feet)
Stream Name** Average Width
of Stream
Before Impact Perennial or
Intermittent?
(please specify)
1 Culvert 150 UT - Eno River 6' Perennial

* List each impact separately and identify temporary impacts. Impacts include, but are not limited to: culverts and associated rip-rap,
dams (separately list impacts due to both structure and flooding), relocation (include linear feet before and after, and net loss/gain),
stabilization activities (cement wall, rip-rap, crib wall, gabions, etc.), excavation, ditching/straightening, etc. If stream relocation is
proposed, plans and profiles showing the linear footprint for both the original and relocated streams must be included.
** Stream names can be found on USGS topographic maps. If a stream has no name, list as UT (unnamed tributary) to the nearest
downstream named stream into which it flows. USGS maps are available through the USGS at 1-800-358-9616, or online at
www.usgs.gov. Several internet sites also allow direct download and printing of USGS maps (e.g., www.topozone.com,
www.mapquest.com, etc.).
Cumulative impacts (linear distance in feet) to all streams on site: 150
Page 6 of 12
3. Open Water Impacts, including Lakes, Ponds, Estuaries, Sounds, Atlantic Ocean and any
other Water of the U.S.
Open Water Impact
Site Number
(indicate on map)
Type of Impact* Area of
Impact
(acres) Name of Waterbody

(if applicable) Type of Waterbody
(lake, pond, estuary, sound,
bay, ocean, etc.)

* List each impact separately and identify temporary impacts. Impacts include, but are not limited to: fill, excavation, dredging,
flooding, drainage, bulkheads, etc.
4. Pond Creation
If construction of a pond is proposed, associated wetland and stream impacts should be
included above in the wetland and stream impact sections. Also, the proposed pond should
be described here and illustrated on any maps included with this application.
Pond to be created in (check all that apply): ® uplands ? stream ? wetlands
Describe the method of construction (e.g., dam/embankment, excavation, installation of
draw-down valve or spillway, etc.): Dam/embankment, excavation, and installation of
spillways
Proposed use or purpose of pond (e.g., livestock watering, irrigation, aesthetic, trout pond,
local stormwater requirement, etc.): Local stormwater requirement.
Size of watershed draining to pond: (00.7 ac.; Q7.1 ac.; (3)3.8 ac.; (4)8.6 ac.; (5)-25.5 ac.
Expected pond surface area: (1)962 sf; (2)2,201 sf; (3)4,244 sf, (4)5,578 sf; (5)5,967 sf
VII. Impact Justification (Avoidance and Minimization)
Specifically describe measures taken to avoid the proposed impacts. It may be useful to provide
information related to site constraints such as topography, building ordinances, accessibility, and
financial viability of the project. The applicant may attach drawings of alternative, lower-impact
site layouts, and explain why these design options were not feasible. Also discuss how impacts
were minimized once the desired site plan was developed. If applicable, discuss construction
techniques to be followed during construction to reduce impacts.
Crossing the stream is the only way to access that portion of the property.
Page 7 of 12
VIII. Mitigation
DWQ - In accordance with 15A NCAC 2H .0500, mitigation may be required by the NC
Division of Water Quality for projects involving greater than or equal to one acre of impacts to
freshwater wetlands or greater than or equal to 150 linear feet of total impacts to perennial
streams.
USACE - In accordance with the Final Notice of Issuance and Modification of Nationwide
Permits, published in the Federal Register on March 9, 2000, mitigation will be required when
necessary to ensure that adverse effects to the aquatic environment are minimal. Factors
including size and type of proposed impact and function and relative value of the impacted
aquatic resource will be considered in determining acceptability of appropriate and practicable
mitigation as proposed. Examples of mitigation that may be appropriate and practicable include,
but are not limited to: reducing the size of the project; establishing and maintaining wetland
and/or upland vegetated buffers to protect open waters such as streams; and replacing losses of
aquatic resource functions and values by creating, restoring, enhancing, or preserving similar
functions and values, preferable in the same watershed.
If mitigation is required for this project, a copy of the mitigation plan must be attached in order
for USACE or DWQ to consider the application complete for processing. Any application
lacking a required mitigation plan or NCWRP concurrence shall be placed on hold as
incomplete. An applicant may also choose to review the current guidelines for stream restoration
in DWQ's Draft Technical Guide for Stream Work in North Carolina, available at
ht!p://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands/strrngide.html.
1. Provide a brief description of the proposed mitigation plan. The description should provide
as much information as possible, including, but not limited to: site location (attach directions
and/or map, if offsite), affected stream and river basin, type and amount (acreage/linear feet)
of mitigation proposed (restoration, enhancement, creation, or preservation), a plan view,
preservation mechanism (e.g., deed restrictions, conservation easement, etc.), and a
description of the current site conditions and proposed method of construction. Please attach
a separate sheet if more space is needed.
NA.
Page 8 of 12
2. Mitigation may also be made by payment into the North Carolina Wetlands Restoration
Program (NCWRP) with the NCWRP's written agreement. Check the box indicating that
you would like to pay into the NCWRP. Please note that payment into the NCWRP must be
reviewed and approved before it can be used to satisfy mitigation requirements. Applicants
will be notified early in the review process by the 401/Wetlands Unit if payment into the
NCWRP is available as an option. For additional information regarding the application
process for the NCWRP, check the NCWRP website at http://h2o.enT.state.nc.us/m/index.htm. If
use of the NCWRP is proposed, please check the appropriate box on page three and provide
the following information:
Amount of stream mitigation requested (linear feet): NA.
Amount of buffer mitigation requested (square feet): NA.
Amount of Riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres): NA.
Amount of Non-riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres): NA.
Amount of Coastal wetland mitigation requested (acres): NA.
IX. Environmental Documentation (DWQ Only)
Does the project involve an expenditure of public funds or the use of public (federal/state/local)
land?
Yes ? No
If yes, does the project require preparation of an environmental document pursuant to the
requirements of the National or North Carolina Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
Note: If you are not sure whether a NEPA/SEPA document is required, call the SEPA
coordinator at [phone] to review current thresholds for environmental documentation.
Yes ? No ?
If yes, has the document review been finalized by the State Clearinghouse? If so, please attach a
copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval letter.
Yes ? No ?
X. Proposed Impacts on Riparian and Watershed Buffers (DWQ Only)
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
required state and local buffers associated with the project. The applicant must also provide
justification for these impacts in Section VII above. All proposed impacts must be listed herein,
and must be clearly identifiable on the accompanying site plan. All buffers must be shown on a
map, whether or not impacts are proposed to the buffers. Correspondence from the DWQ
Regional Office may be included as appropriate. Photographs may also be included at the
applicant's discretion.
Will the project impact protected riparian buffers identified within 15A NCAC 2B .0233
(Meuse), 15A NCAC 2B .0259 (Tar-Pamlico), 15A NCAC 213 .0250 (Randleman Rules and
Water Supply Buffer Requirements), or other (please identify )?
Page 9 of 12

Yes ® No ? If you answered "yes", provide the following information:
Identify the square feet and acreage of impact to each zone of the riparian buffers. If buffer
mitigation is required calculate the required amount of mitigation by applying the buffer
multipliers.
Zone* Impact
(square feet) Multiplier Required
Mitigation
1 8,450 3
2 5,286 1.5
Total 13,736
Zone 1 extends out 3U teet perpendicular trom near bank of channel; Gone 2 extends an
additional 20 feet from the edge of Zone 1.
If buffer mitigation is required, please discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (i.e., Donation
of Property, Conservation Easement, Riparian Buffer Restoration / Enhancement, Preservation or
Payment into the Riparian Buffer Restoration Fund). Please attach all appropriate information as
identified within 15A NCAC 2B .0242 or .0260.
NA.
XI. Stormwater (DWQ Only)
Describe impervious acreage (both existing and proposed) versus total acreage on the site.
Discuss stormwater controls proposed in order to protect surface waters and wetlands
downstream from the property.
The existing impervious surface is 2.59%. The proposed maximum impervious surface is 24%.
Rip-rap will be used at all outlets. Level spreaders will be used at all detention ponds.
XII. Sewage Disposal (DWQ Only)
Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of
wastewater generated from the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
The wastewater generated by the proposed project will be pumped away from the site.
XIII. Violations (DWQ Only)
Is this site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 211.0500) or any Buffer Rules?
Yes ? No
Is this an after-the-fact permit application?
Page 10 of 12

Yes ? No
XIV. Other Circumstances (Optional):
It is the applicant's responsibility to submit the application sufficiently in advance of desired
construction dates to allow processing time for these permits. However, an applicant may
choose to list constraints associated with construction or sequencing that may impose limits on
work schedules (e.g., draw-down schedules for lakes, dates associated with Endangered and
Threatened Species, accessibility problems, or other issues outside of the applicant's control).
/r1R?so? ec?n? 10AN)l, INC
___r ?Z L.L 1. ? tee. ,_ ?- `L-.
Applicant/Agent's Signature ate
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant is provided.)
US Army Corps Of Engineers Field Offices and County Coverage
Asheville Regulatory Field Office Alexander Cherokee Iredell Mitchell
US Army Corps of Engineers Avery Clay Jackson Polk
151 Patton Avenue Buncombe Cleveland Lincoln Rowan
Room 208 Burke Gaston Macon Rutherford
Asheville, NC 28801-5006 Cabarrus Graham Madison Stanley
Telephone: [phone] Caldwell Haywood McDowell Swain
Fax: [phone] Catawba Henderson Mecklenburg Transylvania
Raleigh Regulatory Field Office Alamance Durham Johnston Rockingham
US Army Corps Of Engineers Alleghany Edgecombe Lee Stokes
6508 Falls of the Neuse Road Ashe Franklin Nash Surry
Suite 120 Caswell Forsyth Northampton Vance
Raleigh, NC 27615 Chatham Granville Orange Wake
Telephone: [phone] Davidson Guilford Person Warren
Fax: [phone] Davie Halifax Randolph Wilkes
Washington Regulatory Field Office Beaufort Currituck Jones
US Army Corps Of Engineers Bertie Dare Lenoir
Post Office Box 1000 Camden Gates Martin
Washington, NC 27889-1000 Carteret* Green Pamlico
Telephone: [phone] Chowan Hertford Pasquotank
Fax: [phone] Craven Hyde Perquimans
Wilmington Regulatory Field Office
US Army Corps Of Engineers
Post Office Box 1890
Wilmington, NC 28402-1890
Anson Duplin Onslow
Bladen Harnett Pender
Brunswick Hoke Richmond
Carteret Montgomery Robeson
Pitt
Tyrrell
Washington
Wayne
6M
Union
Watauga
Yancey
Wilson
Yadkin
*Croatan National Forest Only
Page 11 of 12
SEAR•BROWN
1000 CORPORATE DRIVE, SUITE 101
HILLSBOROUGH, NORTH CAROLINA 27278
[phone] Fax: [phone]
r Letter Of Transmittal
APR
3 j
4D) tG2.T1F1LCAT1br1 VN!T DATE 4/Z2-/C;)2- PROJ.NO. (OWg
1650 Moo I Sc-.agca C'eOTEe RE EM0 FbejaS i 01 1qQ2l
X141 -LG N >,1C a lt®9 9- t 61 6n
ATTN 34)h"
WE ARE SENDING YOU D? Attached ?
? Prints ? Reproducibles ?
? Copy of Letter ? Change Order ?
Under Separate Cover ?
Specifications ?
Transmitted Via
Shop Drawings
COPIES DRAWING DATE DESCRIPTION
0 44-ZZ-a2. Z"s oy e r= ¢.
-•22-02. Z u;:5, A9pL..icA,-reotj
°7 OD-U)9-0 4-22-02 Siparr '1>aq-kn C?2?1o(Na lPlaA)
!?0-Za8'-04 q'2Z-1) Z 1i m "-f' )14-r

TRANSMITTED
ZFor Approval ? As Requested ? For Your Use ? For Review and Comment
COMMENTS
COPY TO
with (?) Enc.
with (?) Enc. SIGNED
#SB-01-HI (11/01)
Office Use Only: Form Version April 2001
USACE Action ID No. DWQ No.
If any particular item is not applicable to this project, please enter "Not
leaving the space blank.
1.
II.
Processing
1. Check all of the approval(s) requested for this project:
? Section 404 Permit
? Section 10 Permit
® 401 Water Quality Certification
® Riparian or Watershed Buffer Rules
.' or "N/A" rather than
APR 3 r 71 ?I
2. Nationwide, Regional or General Permit Number(s) Requested: 39
3. If this notification is solely a courtesy copy because written approval for the 401 Certification
is not required, check here: ?
4. If payment into the North Carolina Wetlands Restoration Program (NCWRP) is proposed for
mitigation of impacts (see section VIII - Mitigation), check here: ?
Applicant Information
1. Owner/Applicant Information
Name: The Manson Company, Inc.
Mailing Address: 21 Stoneridge Circle, Durham, NC 27705
Telephone Number: [phone] Fax Number:
E-mail Address:
2. Agent Information (A signed and dated copy of the Agent Authorization letter must be
attached if the Agent has signatory authority for the owner/applicant.)
Name:
Company Affiliation:
Mailing Address:
Telephone Number: Fax Numben.
E-mail Address:
Page 3 of 12
III. Project Information
Attach a vicinity map clearly showing the location of the property with respect to local
landmarks such as towns, rivers, and roads. Also provide a detailed site plan showing property
boundaries and development plans in relation to surrounding properties. Both the vicinity map
and site plan must include a scale and north arrow. The specific footprints of all buildings,
impervious surfaces, or other facilities must be included. If possible, the maps and plans should
include the appropriate USGS Topographic Quad Map and NRCS Soil Survey with the property
boundaries outlined. Plan drawings, or other maps may be included at the applicant's discretion,
so long as the property is clearly defined. For administrative and distribution purposes, the
USACE requires information to be submitted on sheets no larger than 11 by 17-inch format;
however, DWQ may accept paperwork of any size. DWQ prefers full-size construction
drawings rather than a sequential sheet version of the full-size plans. If full-size plans are
reduced to a small scale such that the final version is illegible, the applicant will be informed that
the project has been placed on hold until decipherable maps are provided.
1. Name of project: Eno Forest (formerly Village by the Eno)
2. T.I.P. Project Number (NCDOT Only): NA
3. Property Identification Number (Tax PIN): 0814-04-84-7223 & 0814-04-84-8730
4. Location
County: Durham Nearest Town: Durham
Subdivision name (include phase/lot number): Eno Forest
Directions to site (include road numbers, landmarks, etc.):
4213 Guess Road (SR 1003), Durham, NC 27712
5. Site coordinates, if available (UTM or Lat/Long): NA
(Note - If project is linear, such as a road or utility line, attach a sheet that separately lists the
coordinates for each crossing of a distinct waterbody.)
6. Describe the existing land use or condition of the site at the time of this application:
Wooded with residential use
7. Property size (acres)
30.34
8. Nearest body of water (stream/river/sound/ocean/lake): Eno River
9. River Basin: Neuse River
(Note - this must be one of North Carolina's seventeen designated major river basins. The
River Basin map is available at http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/admin/mgps/.)
Page 4 of 12
10. Describe the purpose of the proposed work
Road construction.
11. List the type of equipment to be used to construct the project:
Grading and paving equipment.
12. Describe the land use in the vicinity of this project: Residential uses and a state park.
IV. Prior Project History
If jurisdictional determinations and/or permits have been requested and/or obtained for this
project (including all prior phases of the same subdivision) in the past, please explain. Include
the USACE Action ID Number, DWQ Project Number, application date, and date permits and
certifications were issued or withdrawn. Provide photocopies of previously issued permits,
certifications or other useful information. Describe previously approved wetland, stream and
buffer impacts, along with associated mitigation (where applicable). If this is a NCDOT project,
list and describe permits issued for prior segments of the same T.I.P. project, along with
construction schedules.
Important stream evaluation was performed 8/7/01. See attachment.
USACE ACTION ID: 2001121300
V. Future Project Plans
Are any additional permit requests anticipated for this project in the future? If so, describe the
anticipated work, and provide justification for the exclusion of this work from the current
application: No.
VI. Proposed Impacts to Waters of the United States/Waters of the State
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
wetlands, open water, and stream channels associated with the project. The applicant must also
provide justification for these impacts in Section VII below. All proposed impacts, permanent
and temporary, must be listed herein, and must be clearly identifiable on an accompanying site
plan. All wetlands and waters, and all streams (intermittent and perennial) must be shown on a
delineation map, whether or not impacts are proposed to these systems. Wetland and stream
evaluation and delineation forms should be included as appropriate. Photographs may be
included at the applicant's discretion. If this proposed impact is strictly for wetland or stream
mitigation, list and describe the impact in Section VIII below. If additional space is needed for
listing or description, please attach a separate sheet.
Page 5 of 12
1. Wetland Impacts
Wetland Impact
Site Number
(indicate on map)
Type of Impact* Area of
Impact
(acres) Located within
100-year Floodplain**
(yes/no) Distance to
Nearest Stream
(linear feet)
Type of Wetland***

* List each impact separately and identify temporary impacts. Impacts include, but are not limited to: mechanized clearing, grading, fill,
excavation, flooding, ditching/drainage, etc. For dams, separately list impacts due to both structure and flooding.
** 100-Year floodplains are identified through the Federal Emergency Management Agency's (FEMA) Flood Insurance Rate Maps
(FIRM), or FEMA-approved local floodplain maps. Maps are available through the FEMA Map Service Center at 1-800-358-9616, or
online at http://www.fema.gov.
*** List a wetland type that best describes wetland to be impacted (e.g., freshwater/saltwater marsh, forested wetland, beaver pond,
Carolina Bay, bog, etc.)
List the total acreage (estimated) of existing wetlands on the property: NA.
Total area of wetland impact proposed:
2. Stream Impacts, including all intermittent and perennial streams
Stream Impact
Site Number
(indicate on map)
Type of Impact* Length of
Impact
(linear feet)
Stream Name** Average Width
of Stream
Before Impact Perennial or
Intermittent?
(please specify)
1 Culvert 150 UT - Eno River 6' Perennial

* List each impact separately and identify temporary impacts. Impacts include, but are not limited to: culverts and associated rip-rap,
dams (separately list impacts due to both structure and flooding), relocation (include linear feet before and after, and net loss/gain),
stabilization activities (cement wall, rip-rap, crib wall, gabions, etc.), excavation, ditching/straightening, etc. If stream relocation is
proposed, plans and profiles showing the linear footprint for both the original and relocated streams must be included.
** Stream names can be found on USGS topographic maps. If a stream has no name, list as UT (unnamed tributary) to the nearest
downstream named stream into which it flows. USGS maps are available through the USGS at 1-800-358-9616, or online at
www.usgs.gov. Several internet sites also allow direct download and printing of USGS maps (e.g., www.topozone.com,
www.mNquest.com, etc.).
Cumulative impacts (linear distance in feet) to all streams on site: 150
Page 6 of 12
3. Open Water Impacts, including Lakes, Ponds, Estuaries, Sounds, Atlantic Ocean and any
other Water of the U.S.
Open Water Impact
Site Number
(indicate on map)
Type of Impact* Area of
Impact
(acres) Name of Waterbody

(if applicable) Type of Waterbody
(lake, pond, estuary, sound,
bay, ocean, etc.)

* List each impact separately and identify temporary impacts. Impacts include, but are not limited to: fill, excavation, dredging,
flooding, drainage, bulkheads, etc.
4. Pond Creation
If construction of a pond is proposed, associated wetland and stream impacts should be
included above in the wetland and stream impact sections. Also, the proposed pond should
be described here and illustrated on any maps included with this application.
Pond to be created in (check all that apply): ® uplands ? stream ? wetlands
Describe the method of construction (e.g., dam/embankment, excavation, installation of
draw-down valve or spillway, etc.): Dam/embankment, excavation, and installation of
Proposed use or purpose of pond (e.g., livestock watering, irrigation, aesthetic, trout pond,
local stormwater requirement, etc.): Local stormwater requirement.
Size of watershed draining to pond: (1)0.7 ac.; (2)7.1 ac.; (3)3.8 ac.; (4)8.6 ac.; (5)-25.5 ac.
Expected pond surface area: (0962 sf; (2)2,201 sf; (3)4,244 sf; M5,578 sf; (5)5,967 sf
VII. Impact Justification (Avoidance and Minimization)
Specifically describe measures taken to avoid the proposed impacts. It may be useful to provide
information related to site constraints such as topography, building ordinances, accessibility, and
financial viability of the project. The applicant may attach drawings of alternative, lower-impact
site layouts, and explain why these design options were not feasible. Also discuss how impacts
were minimized once the desired site plan was developed. If applicable, discuss construction
techniques to be followed during construction to reduce impacts.
Crossing the stream is the only way to access that portion of the property.
Page 7 of 12
VIII. Mitigation
DWQ - In accordance with 15A NCAC 2H .0500, mitigation may be required by the NC
Division of Water Quality for projects involving greater than or equal to one acre of impacts to
freshwater wetlands or greater than or equal to 150 linear feet of total impacts to perennial
streams.
USACE - In accordance with the Final Notice of Issuance and Modification of Nationwide
Permits, published in the Federal Register on March 9, 2000, mitigation will be required when
necessary to ensure that adverse effects to the aquatic environment are minimal. Factors
including size and type of proposed impact and function and relative value of the impacted
aquatic resource will be considered in determining acceptability of appropriate and practicable
mitigation as proposed. Examples of mitigation that may be appropriate and practicable include,
but are not limited to: reducing the size of the project; establishing and maintaining wetland
and/or upland vegetated buffers to protect open waters such as streams; and replacing losses of
aquatic resource functions and values by creating, restoring, enhancing, or preserving similar
functions and values, preferable in the same watershed.
If mitigation is required for this project, a copy of the mitigation plan must be attached in order
for USACE or DWQ to consider the application complete for processing. Any application
lacking a required mitigation plan or NCWRP concurrence shall be placed on hold as
incomplete. An applicant may also choose to review the current guidelines for stream restoration
in DWQ's Draft Technical Guide for Stream Work in North Carolina, available at
htlp://h2o.enr.state.ne.us/ncwetlands/strmgide.html.
Provide a brief description of the proposed mitigation plan. The description should provide
as much information as possible, including, but not limited to: site location (attach directions
and/or map, if offsite), affected stream and river basin, type and amount (acreage/linear feet)
of mitigation proposed (restoration, enhancement, creation, or preservation), a plan view,
preservation mechanism (e.g., deed restrictions, conservation easement, etc.), and a
description of the current site conditions and proposed method of construction. Please attach
a separate sheet if more space is needed.
NA.
Page 8 of 12
2. Mitigation may also be made by payment into the North Carolina Wetlands Restoration
Program (NCWRP) with the NCWRP's written agreement. Check the box indicating that
you would like to pay into the NCWRP. Please note that payment into the NCWRP must be
reviewed and approved before it can be used to satisfy mitigation requirements. Applicants
will be notified early in the review process by the 401/Wetlands Unit if payment into the
NCWRP is available as an option. For additional information regarding the application
process for the NCWRP, check the NCWRP website at http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/mU/index.htm. If
use of the NCWRP is proposed, please check the appropriate box on page three and provide
the following information:
Amount of stream mitigation requested (linear feet): NA.
Amount of buffer mitigation requested (square feet): NA.
Amount of Riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres): NA.
Amount of Non-riparian wetland mitigation,requested (acres): NA.
Amount of Coastal wetland mitigation requested (acres): NA.
IX. Environmental Documentation (DWQ Only)
Does the project involve an expenditure of public funds or the use of public (federal/state/local)
land?
Yes ? No
If yes, does the project require preparation of an environmental document pursuant to the
requirements of the National or North Carolina Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
Note: If you are not sure whether a NEPA/SEPA document is required, call the SEPA
coordinator at [phone] to review current thresholds for environmental documentation.
Yes ? No ?
If yes, has the document review been finalized by the State Clearinghouse? If so, please attach a
copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval letter.
Yes ? No ?
X. Proposed Impacts on Riparian and Watershed Buffers (DWQ Only)
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
required state and local buffers associated with the project. The applicant must also provide
justification for these impacts in Section VII above. All proposed impacts must be listed herein,
and must be clearly identifiable on the accompanying site plan. All buffers must be shown on a
map, whether or not impacts are proposed to the buffers. Correspondence from the DWQ
Regional Office may be included as appropriate. Photographs may also be included at the
applicant's discretion.
Will the project impact protected riparian buffers identified within 15A NCAC 2B .0233
(Meuse), 15A NCAC 2B .0259 (Tar-Pamlico), 15A NCAC 2B .0250 (Randleman Rules and
Water Supply Buffer Requirements), or other (please identify )?
Page 9 of 12
Yes ® No ? If you answered "yes", provide the following information:
Identify the square feet and acreage of impact to each zone of the riparian buffers. If buffer
mitigation is required calculate the required amount of mitigation by applying the buffer
multipliers.
Zone* Impact
(square feet) Multiplier Required
Mitigation
1 8,450 3
2 5,286 1.5
Total 13,736
* Gone 1 extends out 3U feet perpendicular from near bank of channel; Gone 2 extends an
additional 20 feet from the edge of Zone 1.
If buffer mitigation is required, please discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (i.e., Donation
of Property, Conservation Easement, Riparian Buffer Restoration / Enhancement, Preservation or
Payment into the Riparian Buffer Restoration Fund). Please attach all appropriate information as
identified within 15A NCAC 2B .0242 or .0260.
XI. Stormwater (DWQ Only)
Describe impervious acreage (both existing and proposed) versus total acreage on the site.
Discuss stormwater controls proposed in order to protect surface waters and wetlands
downstream from the property.
The existing impervious surface is 2.59%. The proposed maximum impervious surface is 24%.
Rip-rap will be used at all outlets. Level spreaders will be used at all detention ponds.
XII. Sewage Disposal (DWQ Only)
Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of
wastewater generated from the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
The wastewater generated by the proposed project will be pumped away from the site.
XIII. Violations (DWQ Only)
Is this site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H.0500) or any Buffer Rules?
Yes ? No
Is this an after-the-fact permit application?
Page 10 of 12
Yes ? No
YJV. Other Circumstances (Optional):
It is the applicant's responsibility to submit the application sufficiently in advance of desired
construction dates to allow processing time for these permits. However, an applicant may
choose to list constraints associated with construction or sequencing that may impose limits on
work schedules (e.g., draw-down schedules for lakes, dates associated with Endangered and
Threatened Species, accessibility problems, or other issues outside of the applicant's control).
NA_
?g_ Co/Yl AgAjl, iNL.
---y is C -.P- e . w? - L_
Applicant/Agent's Signature ate
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant is provided.)
US Army Corps Of Engineers Field Offices and County Coverage
Asheville Regulatory Field Office Alexander Cherokee Iredell Mitchell
US Army Corps of Engineers Avery Clay Jackson Polk
151 Patton Avenue Buncombe Cleveland Lincoln Rowan
Room 208 Burke Gaston Macon Rutherford
Asheville, NC 28801-5006 Cabarrus Graham Madison Stanley
Telephone: [phone] Caldwell Haywood McDowell Swain
Fax: [phone] Catawba Henderson Mecklenburg Transylvania
Raleigh Regulatory Field Office Alamance Durham Johnston Rockingham
US Army Corps Of Engineers Alleghany Edgecombe Lee Stokes
6508 Falls of the Neuse Road Ashe Franklin Nash Surry
Suite 120 Caswell Forsyth Northampton Vance
Raleigh, NC 27615 Chatham Granville Orange Wake
Telephone: [phone] Davidson Guilford Person Warren
Fax: [phone] Davie Halifax Randolph Wilkes
Washington Regulatory Field Office Beaufort Currituck Jones
US Army Corps Of Engineers Bertie Dare Lenoir
Post Office Box 1000 Camden Gates Martin
Washington, NC 27889-1000 Carteret* Green Pamlico
Telephone: [phone] Chowan Hertford Pasquotank
Fax: [phone] Craven Hyde Perquimans
Wilmington Regulatory Field Office
US Army Corps Of Engineers
Post Office Box 1890
Wilmington, NC 28402-1890
Anson Duplin Onslow
Bladen Harnett Pender
Brunswick Hoke- Richmond
Carteret Montgomery Robeson
Pitt
Tyrrell
Washington
Wayne
6S
Union
Watauga
Yancey
Wilson
Yadkin
*Croatan National Forest Only
Page 11 of 12

Office Use Only: Form Version April 2001
USACE Action ID No. DWQ No.
If any particular item is not applicable to this project, please enter "Not Applicable" or "N/A" rather than
leaving the space blank.
1. Processing
APR . 3 2002
1. Check all of the approval(s) requested for this project: --
? Section 404 Permit Ws GROUP
? Section 10 Permit
® 401 Water Quality Certification
® Riparian or Watershed Buffer Rules
2. Nationwide, Regional or General Permit Number(s) Requested: 39
3. If this notification is solely a courtesy copy because written approval for the 401 Certification
is not required, check here: ?
4. If payment into the North Carolina Wetlands Restoration Program (NCWRP) is proposed for
mitigation of impacts (see section VIII - Mitigation), check here: ?
II. Applicant Information
1. Owner/Applicant Information
Name: The Manson Company, Inc.
Mailing Address: 21 Stoneridge Circle, Durham, NC 27705
Telephone Number: [phone] Fax Number:
E-mail Address:
2. Agent Information (A signed and dated copy of the Agent Authorization letter must be
attached if the Agent has signatory authority for the owner/applicant.)
Name:
Company Affiliation:
Mailing Address:
Telephone Number: Fax Number:
E-mail Address:
Page 3 of 12
III. Project Information
Attach a vicinity map clearly showing the location of the property with respect to local
landmarks such as towns, rivers, and roads. Also provide a detailed site plan showing property
boundaries and development plans in relation to surrounding properties. Both the vicinity map
and site plan must include a scale and north arrow. The specific footprints of all buildings,
impervious surfaces, or other facilities must be included. If possible, the maps and plans should
include the appropriate USGS Topographic Quad Map and NRCS Soil Survey with the property
boundaries outlined. Plan drawings, or other maps may be included at the applicant's discretion,
so long as the property is clearly defined. For administrative and distribution purposes, the
USACE requires information to be submitted on sheets no larger than 11 by 17-inch format;
however, DWQ may accept paperwork of any size. DWQ prefers full-size construction
drawings rather than a sequential sheet version of the full-size plans. If full-size plans are
reduced to a small scale such that the final version is illegible, the applicant will be informed that
the project has been placed on hold until decipherable maps are provided.
1. Name of project: Eno Forest (formerly Village by the Eno)
2. T.I.P. Project Number (NCDOT Only): NA
3. Property Identification Number (Tax PIN): 0814-04-84-7223 & 0814-04-84-8730
4. Location
County: Durham Nearest Town: Durham
Subdivision name (include phase/lot number): Eno Forest
Directions to site (include road numbers, landmarks, etc.):
4213 Guess Road (SR 1003), Durham, NC 27712
5. Site coordinates, if available (UTM or Lat/Long): NA
(Note - If project is linear, such as a road or utility line, attach a sheet that separately lists the
coordinates for each crossing of a distinct waterbody.)
6. Describe the existing land use or condition of the site at the time of this application:
Wooded with residential use
7. Property size (acres): 30.34
8. Nearest body of water (stream/river/sound/ocean/lake):
Eno River
9. River Basin: Neuse River
(Note - this must be one of North Carolina's seventeen designated major river basins. The
River Basin map is available at http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/admin/maps/.)
Page 4 of 12
10. Describe the purpose of the proposed work: Road construction.
11. List the type of equipment to be used to construct the project:
Grading and paving equipment.
12. Describe the land use in the vicinity of this project: Residential uses and a state park.
IV. Prior Project History
If jurisdictional determinations and/or permits have been requested and/or obtained for this
project (including all prior phases of the same subdivision) in the past, please explain. Include
the USACE Action ID Number, DWQ Project Number, application date, and date permits and
certifications were issued or withdrawn. Provide photocopies of previously issued permits,
certifications or other useful information. Describe previously approved wetland, stream and
buffer impacts, along with associated mitigation (where applicable). If this is a NCDOT project,
list and describe permits issued for prior segments of the same T.I.P. project, along with
construction schedules.
Important stream evaluation was performed 8/7/01. See attachment.
USACE ACTION ID: 2001121300
V. Future Project Plans
Are any additional permit requests. anticipated for this project in the future? If so, describe the
anticipated work, and provide justification for the exclusion of this work from the current
application: No.
VI. Proposed Impacts to Waters of the United States/Waters of the State
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
wetlands, open water, and stream channels associated with the project. The applicant must also
provide justification for these impacts in Section VII below. All proposed impacts, permanent
and temporary, must be listed herein, and must be clearly identifiable on an accompanying site
plan. All wetlands and waters, and all streams (intermittent and perennial) must be shown on a
delineation map, whether or not impacts are proposed to these systems. Wetland and stream
evaluation and delineation forms should be included as appropriate. Photographs may be
included at the applicant's discretion. If this proposed impact is strictly for wetland or stream
mitigation, list and describe the impact in Section VIII below. If additional space is needed for
listing or description, please attach a separate sheet.
Page 5 of 12
1. Wetland Impacts
Wetland Impact
Site Number
(indicate on map)
Type of Impact* Area of
Impact
(acres) Located within
100-year Floodplain**
(yes/no) Distance to
Nearest Stream
(linear feet)
Type of Wetland***

* List each impact separately and identify temporary impacts. Impacts include, but are not limited to: mechanized clearing, grading, fill,
excavation, flooding, ditching/drainage, etc. For dams, separately list impacts due to both structure and flooding.
** 100-Year floodplains are identified through the Federal Emergency Management Agency's (FEMA) Flood Insurance Rate Maps
(FIRM), or FEMA-approved local floodplain maps. Maps are available through the FEMA Map Service Center at 1-800-358-9616, or
online at http://www.fema.gov.
*** List a wetland type that best describes wetland to be impacted (e.g., freshwater/saltwater marsh, forested wetland, beaver pond,
Carolina Bay, bog, etc.)
List the total acreage (estimated) of existing wetlands on the property: NA.
Total area of wetland impact proposed:
2. Stream Impacts, including all intermittent and perennial streams
Stream Impact
Site Number
(indicate on map)
Type of Impact* Length of
Impact
(linear feet)
Stream Name** Average Width
of Stream
Before Impact Perennial or
Intermittent?
(please specify)
1 Culvert 150 UT - Eno River 6' Perennial

* List each impact separately and identify temporary impacts. Impacts include, but are not limited to: culverts and associated rip-rap,
dams (separately list impacts due to both structure and flooding), relocation (include linear feet before and after, and net loss/gain),
stabilization activities (cement wall, rip-rap, crib wall, gabions, etc.), excavation, ditching/straightening, etc. If stream relocation is
proposed, plans and profiles showing the linear footprint for both the original and relocated streams must be included.
** Stream names can be found on USGS topographic maps. If a stream has no name, list as UT (unnamed tributary) to the nearest
downstream named stream into which it flows. USGS maps are available through the USGS at 1-800-358-9616, or online at
www.usgs.gov. Several internet sites also allow direct download and printing of USGS maps (e.g., www.topozone.com,
www.mapquest.com, etc.).
Cumulative impacts (linear distance in feet) to all streams on site: 150
Page 6 of 12
3. Open Water Impacts, including Lakes, Ponds, Estuaries, Sounds, Atlantic Ocean and any
other Water of the U.S.
Open Water Impact
Site Number
(indicate on map)
Type of Impact* Area of
Impact
(acres) Name of Waterbody
(if applicable) Type of Waterbody
(lake, pond, estuary, sound,
bay, ocean, etc.)

* List each impact separately and identify temporary impacts. Impacts include, but are not limited to: fill, excavation, dredging,
flooding, drainage, bulkheads, etc.
4. Pond Creation
If construction of a pond is proposed, associated wetland and stream impacts should be
included above in the wetland and stream impact sections.- Also, the proposed pond should
be described here and illustrated on any maps included with this application.
Pond to be created in (check all that apply): ® uplands ? stream ? wetlands
Describe the method of construction (e.g., dam/embankment, excavation, installation of
draw-down valve or spillway, etc.): Dam/embankment, excavation, and installation of
Proposed use or purpose of pond (e.g., livestock watering, irrigation, aesthetic, trout pond,
local stormwater requirement, etc.): Local stormwater requirement.
Size of watershed draining to pond: (1)0.7 ac.; Q7.1 ac.; (3)3.8 ac.; (4)8.6 ac.; (5)-25.5 ac.
Expected pond surface area: (1)962 sf; (2)2,201 sf; (3)4,244 sf, (4)5,578 sf; (5)5,967 sf
VII. Impact Justification (Avoidance and Minimization)
Specifically describe measures taken to avoid the proposed impacts. It may be useful to provide
information related to site constraints such as topography, building ordinances, accessibility, and
financial viability of the project. The applicant may attach drawings of alternative, lower-impact
site layouts, and explain why these design options were not feasible. Also discuss how impacts
were minimized once the desired site plan was developed. If applicable, discuss construction
techniques to be followed during construction to reduce impacts.
Crossing the stream is the only way to access that portion of the property.
Page 7 of 12
VIII. Mitigation
DWQ - In accordance with 15A NCAC 2H .0500, mitigation may be required by the NC
Division of Water Quality for projects involving greater than or equal to one acre of impacts to
freshwater wetlands or greater than or equal to 150 linear feet of total impacts to perennial
streams.
USACE - In accordance with the Final Notice of Issuance and Modification of Nationwide
Permits, published in the Federal Register on March 9, 2000, mitigation will be required when
necessary to ensure that adverse effects to the aquatic environment are minimal. Factors
including size and type of proposed impact and function and relative value of the impacted
aquatic resource will be considered in determining acceptability of appropriate and practicable
mitigation as proposed. Examples of mitigation that may be appropriate and practicable include,
but are not limited to: reducing the size of the project; establishing and maintaining wetland
and/or upland vegetated buffers to protect open waters such as streams; and replacing losses of
aquatic resource functions and values by creating, restoring, enhancing, or preserving similar
functions and values, preferable in the same watershed.
If mitigation is required for this project, a copy of the mitigation plan must be attached in order
for USACE or DWQ to consider the application complete for processing. Any application
lacking a required mitigation plan or NCWRP concurrence shall be placed on hold as
incomplete. An applicant may also choose to review the current guidelines for stream restoration
in DWQ's Draft Technical Guide for Stream Work in North Carolina, available at
hlt2://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands/strrngide.hbnl.
Provide a brief description of the proposed mitigation plan. The description should provide
as much information as possible, including, but not limited to: site location (attach directions
and/or map, if offsite), affected stream and river basin, type and amount (acreage/linear feet)
of mitigation proposed (restoration, enhancement, creation, or preservation), a plan view,
preservation mechanism (e.g., deed restrictions, conservation easement, etc.), and a
description of the current site conditions and proposed method of construction. Please attach
a separate sheet if more space is needed.
NA.
Page 8 of 12
2. Mitigation may also be made by payment into the North Carolina Wetlands Restoration
Program (NCWRP) with the NCWRP's written agreement. Check the box indicating that
you would like to pay into the NCWRP. Please note that payment into the NCWRP must be
reviewed and approved before it can be used to satisfy mitigation requirements. Applicants
will be notified early in the review process by the 401/Wetlands Unit if payment into the
NCWRP is available as an option. For additional information regarding the application
process for the NCWRP, check the NCWRP website at http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/wm/index.htm. If
use of the NCWRP is proposed, please check the appropriate box on page three and provide
the following information:
Amount of stream mitigation requested (linear feet): NA.
Amount of buffer mitigation requested (square feet): NA.
Amount of Riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres): NA.
Amount of Non-riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres): NA.
Amount of Coastal wetland mitigation requested (acres): NA.
IX. Environmental Documentation (DWQ Only)
Does the project involve an expenditure of public funds or the use of public (federal/state/local)
land?
Yes ? No
If yes, does the project require preparation of an environmental document pursuant to the
requirements of the National or North Carolina Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
Note: If you are not sure whether a NEPA/SEPA document is required, call the SEPA
coordinator at [phone] to review current thresholds for environmental documentation.
Yes ? No ?
If yes, has the document review been finalized by the State Clearinghouse? If so, please attach a
copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval letter.
Yes ? No ?
X. Proposed Impacts on Riparian and Watershed Buffers (DWQ Only)
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
required state and local buffers associated with the project. The applicant must also provide
justification for these impacts in Section VII above. All proposed impacts must be listed herein,
and must be clearly identifiable on the accompanying site plan. All buffers must be shown on a
map, whether or not impacts are proposed to the buffers. Correspondence from the DWQ
Regional Office may be included as appropriate. Photographs may also be included at the
applicant's discretion.
Will the project impact protected riparian buffers identified within 15A NCAC 2B .0233
(Meuse), 15A NCAC 2B .0259 (Tar-Pamlico), 15A NCAC 2B .0250 (Randleman Rules and
Water Supply Buffer Requirements), or other (please identify )?
Page 9 of 12
Yes ® No ? If you answered "yes", provide the following information:
Identify the square feet and acreage of impact to each zone of the riparian buffers. If buffer
mitigation is required calculate the required amount of mitigation by applying the buffer
multipliers.
Zone* Impact
(square feet) Multiplier Required
Mitigation
1 8,450 3
2 5,286 1.5
Total 13,736
fi Zone 1 extends out 3U teet perpendicular from near bank of channel; Zone l extends an
additional 20 feet from the edge of Zone 1.
If buffer mitigation is required, please discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (i.e., Donation
of Property, Conservation Easement, Riparian Buffer Restoration / Enhancement, Preservation or
Payment into the Riparian Buffer Restoration Fund). Please attach all appropriate information as
identified within 15A NCAC 2B .0242 or .0260.
NA.
XI. Stormwater (DWQ Only)
Describe impervious acreage (both existing and proposed) versus total acreage on the site.
Discuss stormwater controls proposed in order to protect surface waters and wetlands
downstream from the property.
The existing impervious surface is 2.59%. The proposed maximum impervious surface is 24%.
Rip-rap will be used at all outlets. Level spreaders will be used at all detention ponds.
XII. Sewage Disposal (DWQ Only)
Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of
wastewater generated from the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
The wastewater generated by the proposed project will be pumped away from the site.
XIII. Violations (DWQ Only)
Is this site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H.0500) or any Buffer Rules?
Yes ? No
Is this an after-the-fact permit application?
Page 10 of 12
Yes ? No
XIV. Other Circumstances (Optional):
It is the applicant's responsibility to submit the application sufficiently in advance of desired
construction dates to allow processing time for these permits. However, an applicant may
choose to list constraints associated with construction or sequencing that may impose limits on
work schedules (e.g., draw-down schedules for lakes, dates associated with Endangered and
Threatened Species, accessibility problems, or other issues outside of the applicant's control).
NA.
evm AqA) 1, INC
Applicant/Agent's Signature ate
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant is provided.)
US Army Corps Of Engineers Field Offices and County Coverage
Asheville Regulatory Field Office Alexander Cherokee Iredell Mitchell
US Army Corps of Engineers Avery Clay Jackson Polk
151 Patton Avenue Buncombe Cleveland Lincoln Rowan
Room 208 Burke Gaston Macon Rutherford
Asheville, NC 28801-5006 Cabamxs Graham Madison Stanley
Telephone: [phone] Caldwell Haywood McDowell Swain
Fax: [phone] Catawba Henderson Mecklenburg Transylvania
Raleigh Regulatory Field Office Alamance Durham Johnston Rockingham
US Army Corps Of Engineers Alleghany Edgecombe Lee Stokes
6508 Falls of the Neuse Road Ashe Franklin Nash Surry
Suite 120 Caswell Forsyth Northampton Vance
Raleigh, NC 27615 Chatham Granville Orange Wake
Telephone: [phone] Davidson Guilford Person Warren
Fax: [phone] Davie Halifax Randolph Wilkes
Washington Regulatory Field Office Beaufort Currituck Jones
US Army Corps Of Engineers Bertie Dare Lenoir
Post Office Box 1000 Camden Gates Martin
Washington, NC 27889-1000 Carteret* Green Pamlico
Telephone: [phone] Chowan Hertford Pasquotank
Fax: [phone] Craven Hyde Perquimans
Wilmington Regulatory Field Office
US Army Corps Of Engineers
Post Office Box 1890
Wilmington, NC 28402-1890
Anson Duplin Onslow
Bladen Harnett Pender
Brunswick Hoke- Richmond
Carteret Montgomery Robeson
Pitt
Tyrrell
Washington
Wayne
6M
Union
Watauga
Yancey
Wilson
Yadkin
*Croatan National Forest Only
Page 11 of 12
Office Use Only: Form Version April 2001
USACE Action ID No. DWQ No.
If any particular item is not applicable to this project, please enter "Not Applicable" or "N/A" rather than
leaving the space blank. 7_1
u
2
1. Processing s. .
?.
1. Check all of the approval(s) requested for this project: App 3 2Qm
? Section 404 Permit
Section 10 Permit WETLANDS GROUP
F-1 _W_ A7E OUALITV SECTI N
® 401 Water Quality Certification rt,°
® Riparian or Watershed Buffer Rules
2. Nationwide, Regional or General Permit Number(s) Requested
39
3. If this notification is solely a courtesy copy because written approval for the 401 Certification
is not required, check here: ?
4. If payment into the North Carolina Wetlands Restoration Program (NCWRP) is proposed for
mitigation of impacts (see section VIII - Mitigation), check here: ?
II. Applicant Information
1. Owner/Applicant Information
Name: The Manson Company, Inc.
Mailing Address: 21 Stoneridge Circle, Durham, NC 27705
Telephone Number: [phone] Fax Number:
E-mail Address:
2. Agent Information (A signed and dated copy of the Agent Authorization letter must be
attached if the Agent has signatory authority for the owner/applicant.)
Name:
Company Affiliation:
Mailing Address:
Telephone Number:
E-mail Address:
Fax Number:
Page 3 of 12
III. Project Information
Attach a vicinity map clearly showing the location of the property with respect to local
landmarks such as towns, rivers, and roads. Also provide a detailed site plan showing property
boundaries and development plans in relation to surrounding properties. Both the vicinity map
and site plan must include a scale and north arrow. The specific footprints of all buildings,
impervious surfaces, or other facilities must be included. If possible, the maps and plans should
include the appropriate USGS Topographic Quad Map and NRCS Soil Survey with the property
boundaries outlined. Plan drawings, or other maps may be included at the applicant's discretion,
so long as the property is clearly defined. For administrative and distribution purposes, the
USACE requires information to be submitted on sheets no larger than 11 by 17-inch format;
however, DWQ may accept paperwork of any size. DWQ prefers full-size construction
drawings rather than a sequential sheet version of the full-size plans. If full-size plans are
reduced to a small scale such that the final version is illegible, the applicant will be informed that
the project has been placed on hold until decipherable maps are provided.
1. Name of project: Eno Forest (formerly Village by the Eno)
2. T.I.P. Project Number (NCDOT Only):
3. Property Identification Number (Tax PIN): 0814-04-84-7223 & 0814-04-84-8730
4. Location
County: Durham Nearest Town: Durham
Subdivision name (include phase/lot number): Eno Forest
Directions to site (include road numbers, landmarks, etc.):
4213 Guess Road (SR 1003), Durham, NC 27712
5. Site coordinates, if available (UTM or Lat/Long): NA
(Note - If project is linear, such as a road or utility line, attach a sheet that separately lists the
coordinates for each crossing of a distinct waterbody.)
6. Describe the existing land use or condition of the site at the time of this application:
Wooded with residential use
7. Property size (acres): 30.34
8. Nearest body of water (stream/river/sound/ocean/lake): Eno River
9. River Basin: Neuse River
(Note - this must be one of North Carolina's seventeen designated major river basins. The
/.)
River Basin map is available at http://li2o.enr.state.nc.us/admin/m.aps
Page 4 of 12
10. Describe the purpose of the proposed work: Road construction.
11. List the type of equipment to be used to construct the project:
Grading and paving equipment.
12. Describe the land use in the vicinity of this project: Residential uses and a state
IV. Prior Project History
If jurisdictional determinations and/or permits have been requested and/or obtained for this
project (including all prior phases of the same subdivision) in the past, please explain. Include
the USACE Action ID Number, DWQ Project Number, application date, and date permits and
certifications were issued or withdrawn. Provide photocopies of previously issued permits,
certifications or other useful information. Describe previously approved wetland, stream and
buffer impacts, along with associated mitigation (where applicable). If this is a NCDOT project,
list and describe permits issued for prior segments of the same T.I.P. project, along with
construction schedules.
Important stream evaluation was performed 8/7/01. See attachment.
USACE ACTION ID: 2001121300
V. Future Project Plans
Are any additional permit requests anticipated for this project in the future?
anticipated work, and provide justification for the exclusion of this work
application: No.
VI. Proposed Impacts to Waters of the United States/Waters of the State
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
wetlands, open water, and stream channels associated with the project. The applicant must also
provide justification for these impacts in Section VII below. All proposed impacts, permanent
and temporary, must be listed herein, and must be clearly identifiable on an accompanying site
plan. All wetlands and waters, and all streams (intermittent and perennial) must be shown on a
delineation map, whether or not impacts are proposed to these systems. Wetland and stream
evaluation and delineation forms should be included as appropriate. Photographs may be
included at the applicant's discretion. If this proposed impact is strictly for wetland or stream
mitigation, list and describe the impact in Section VIII below. If additional space is needed for
listing or description, please attach a separate sheet.
If so, describe the
from the current
Page 5 of 12
1. Wetland Impacts
Wetland Impact
Site Number
(indicate on map)
Type of Impact* Area of
Impact
(acres) Located within
100-year Floodplain**
(yes/no) Distance to
Nearest Stream
(linear feet)
Type of Wetland***

* List each impact separately and identify temporary impacts. Impacts include, but are not limited to: mechanized clearing, grading, fill,
excavation, flooding, ditching/drainage, etc. For dams, separately list impacts due to both structure and flooding.
** 100-Year floodplains are identified through the Federal Emergency Management Agency's (FEMA) Flood Insurance Rate Maps
(FIRM), or FEMA-approved local floodplain maps. Maps are available through the FEMA Map Service Center at 1-800-358-9616, or
online at http://www.fema.gov.
*** List a wetland type that best describes wetland to be impacted (e.g., freshwater/saltwater marsh, forested wetland, beaver pond,
Carolina Bay, bog, etc.)
List the total acreage (estimated) of existing wetlands on the property: NA.
Total area of wetland impact proposed:
2. Stream Impacts, including all intermittent and perennial streams
Stream Impact
Site Number
(indicate on map)
Type of Impact* Length of
Impact
(linear feet)
Stream Name** Average Width
of Stream
Before Impact Perennial or
Intermittent?
(please specify)
1 Culvert 150 UT - Eno River 6' Perennial

* List each impact separately and identify temporary impacts. Impacts include, but are not limited to: culverts and associated rip-rap,
dams (separately list impacts due to both structure and flooding), relocation (include linear feet before and after, and net loss/gain),
stabilization activities (cement wall, rip-rap, crib wall, gabions, etc.), excavation, ditching/straightening, etc. If stream relocation is
proposed, plans and profiles showing the linear footprint for both the original and relocated streams must be included.
** Stream names can be found on USGS topographic maps. If a stream has no name, list as UT (unnamed tributary) to the nearest
downstream named stream into which it flows. USGS maps are available through the USGS at 1-800-358-9616, or online at
www.usgs.gov. Several intemet sites also allow direct download and printing of USGS maps (e.g., www.topozone.com,
www.mapquest.com, etc.).
Cumulative impacts (linear distance in feet) to all streams on site: 150
Page 6 of 12
3. Open Water Impacts, including Lakes, Ponds, Estuaries, Sounds, Atlantic Ocean and any
other Water of the U.S.
Open Water Impact
Site Number
(indicate on map)
Type of Impact* Area of
Impact
(acres) Name of Waterbod
(if applicable) y Type of Waterbody
(lake, pond, estuary, sound,
bay, ocean, etc.)

* List each impact separately and identify temporary impacts. Impacts include, but are not limited to: fill, excavation, dredging,
flooding, drainage, bulkheads, etc.
4. Pond Creation
If construction of a pond is proposed, associated wetland and stream impacts should be
included above in the wetland and stream impact sections. Also, the proposed pond should
be described here and illustrated on any maps included with this application.
Pond to be created in (check all that apply): ® uplands ? stream ? wetlands
Describe the method of construction (e.g., dam/embankment, excavation, installation of
draw-down valve or spillway, etc.): Dam/embankment, excavation, and installation of
spillways
Proposed use or purpose of pond (e.g., livestock watering, irrigation, aesthetic, trout pond,
local stormwater requirement, etc.): Local stormwater requirement.
Size of watershed draining to pond: (1)0.7 ac.; Q7.1 ac.; (3)3.8 ac.; M8.6 ac.; (5)-25.5 ac.
Expected pond surface area: (1)962 sf; (2)2,201 sf; (3)4,244 sf; 05,578 sf; (5)5,967 sf
VII. Impact Justification (Avoidance and Minimization)
Specifically describe measures taken to avoid the proposed impacts. It may be useful to provide
information related to site constraints such as topography, building ordinances, accessibility, and
financial viability of the project. The applicant may attach drawings of alternative, lower-impact
site layouts, and explain why these design options were not feasible. Also discuss how impacts
were minimized once the desired site plan was developed. If applicable, discuss construction
techniques to be followed during construction to reduce impacts.
Crossing the stream is the only way to access that portion of the property.
Page 7 of 12
VIII. Mitigation
DWQ - In accordance with 15A NCAC 2H .0500, mitigation may be required by the NC
Division of Water Quality for projects involving greater than or equal to one acre of impacts to
freshwater wetlands or greater than or equal to 150 linear feet of total impacts to perennial
streams.
USACE - In accordance with the Final Notice of Issuance and Modification of Nationwide
Permits, published in the Federal Register on March 9, 2000, mitigation will be required when
necessary to ensure that adverse effects to the aquatic environment are minimal. Factors
including size and type of proposed impact and function and relative value of the ,impacted
aquatic resource will be considered in determining acceptability of appropriate and practicable
mitigation as proposed. Examples of mitigation that may be appropriate and practicable include,
but are not limited to: reducing the size of the project; establishing and maintaining wetland
and/or upland vegetated buffers to protect open waters such as streams; and replacing losses of
aquatic resource functions and values by creating, restoring, enhancing, or preserving similar
functions and values, preferable in the same watershed.
If mitigation is required for this project, a copy of the mitigation plan must be attached in order
for USACE or DWQ to consider the application complete for processing. Any application
lacking a required mitigation plan or NCWRP concurrence shall be placed on hold as
incomplete. An applicant may also choose to review the current guidelines for stream restoration
in DWQ's Draft Technical Guide for Stream Work in North Carolina, available at
htlp://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands/stnugide.html.
Provide a brief description of the proposed mitigation plan. The description should provide
as much information as possible, including, but not limited to: site location (attach directions
and/or map, if offsite), affected stream and river basin, type and amount (acreage/linear feet)
of mitigation proposed (restoration, enhancement, creation, or preservation), a plan view,
preservation mechanism (e.g., deed restrictions, conservation easement, etc.), and a
description of the current site conditions and proposed method of construction. Please attach
a separate sheet if more space is needed.
Page 8 of 12
2. Mitigation may also be made by payment into the North Carolina Wetlands Restoration
Program (NCWRP) with the NCWRP's written agreement. Check the box indicating that
you would like to pay into the NCWRP. Please note that payment into the NCWRP must be
reviewed and approved before it can be used to satisfy mitigation requirements. Applicants
will be notified early in the review process by the 401/Wetlands Unit if payment into the
NCWRP is available as an option. For additional information regarding the application
process for the NCWRP, check the NCWRP website at http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/wrp/index.htm. If
use of the NCWRP is proposed, please check the appropriate box on page three and provide
the following information:
Amount of stream mitigation requested (linear feet): NA.
Amount of buffer mitigation requested (square feet): NA.
Amount of Riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres): NA.
Amount of Non-riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres): NA.
Amount of Coastal wetland mitigation requested (acres): NA.
IX. Environmental Documentation (DWQ Only)
Does the project involve an expenditure of public funds or the use of public (federal/state/local)
land?
Yes ? No
If yes, does the project require preparation of an environmental document pursuant to the
requirements of the National or North Carolina Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
Note: If you are not sure whether a NEPA/SEPA document is required, call the SEPA
coordinator at [phone] to review current thresholds for environmental documentation.
Yes ? No ?
If yes, has the document review been finalized by the State Clearinghouse? If so, please attach a
copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval letter.
Yes ? No ?
X. Proposed Impacts on Riparian and Watershed Buffers (DWQ Only)
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
required state and local buffers associated with the project. The applicant must also provide
justification for these impacts in Section VII above. All proposed impacts must be listed herein,
and must be clearly identifiable on the accompanying site plan. All buffers must be shown on a
map, whether or not impacts are proposed to the buffers. Correspondence from the DWQ
Regional Office may be included as appropriate. Photographs may also be included at the
applicant's discretion.
Will the project impact protected riparian buffers identified within 15A NCAC 2B .0233
(Meuse), 15A NCAC 2B .0259 (Tar-Pamlico), 15A NCAC 2B .0250 (Randleman Rules and
Water Supply Buffer Requirements), or other (please identify. )?
Page 9 of 12
Yes ® No ? If you answered "yes", provide the following information:
Identify the square feet and acreage of impact to each zone of the riparian buffers. If buffer
mitigation is required calculate the required amount of mitigation by applying the buffer
multipliers.
Zone* Impact
(square feet) Multiplier Required
Mitigation
1 8,450 3
2 5,286 1.5
Total 13,736
* Zone 1 extends out 30 feet perpendicular trom near bank of channel; Zone Z extends an
additional 20 feet from the edge of Zone 1.
If buffer mitigation is required, please discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (i.e., Donation
of Property, Conservation Easement, Riparian Buffer Restoration / Enhancement, Preservation or
Payment into the Riparian Buffer Restoration Fund). Please attach all appropriate information as
identified within 15A NCAC 2B .0242 or.0260.
XI. Stormwater (DWQ Only)
Describe impervious acreage (both existing and proposed) versus total acreage on the site.
Discuss stormwater controls proposed in order to protect surface waters and wetlands
downstream from the property.
The existinlz impervious surface is 2.59%. The proposed maximum impervious surface is 24%.
Rip-rap will be used at all outlets. Level spreaders will be used at all detention ponds.
XII. Sewage Disposal (DWQ Only)
Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of
wastewater generated from the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
The wastewater generated by the proposed project will be pumped away from the site.
XIII. Violations (DWQ Only)
Is this site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500) or any Buffer Rules?
Yes ? No
Is this an after-the-fact permit application?
Page 10 of 12

Yes ? No
XIV. Other Circumstances (Optional):
It is the applicant's responsibility to submit the application sufficiently in advance of desired
construction dates to allow processing time for these permits. However, an applicant may
choose to list constraints associated with construction or sequencing that may impose limits on
work schedules (e.g., draw-down schedules for lakes, dates associated with Endangered and
Threatened Species, accessibility problems, or other issues outside of the applicant's control).
NA
Tlg, / 7A1y-soA ) C<Dm Ag1U1, INN-
Applicant/Agent's Signature 15ate
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant is provided.)
US Army Corps Of Engineers Field Offices and County Coverage
Asheville Regulatory Field Office Alexander Cherokee Iredell Mitchell
US Army Corps of Engineers Avery Clay Jackson Polk
151 Patton Avenue Buncombe Cleveland Lincoln Rowan
Room 208 Burke Gaston Macon Rutherford
Asheville, NC 28801-5006 Cabarr s Graham Madison Stanley
Telephone: [phone] Caldwell Haywood McDowell Swain
Fax: [phone] Catawba Henderson Mecklenburg Transylvania
Raleigh Regulatory Field Office Alamance Durham Johnston Rockingham
US Army Corps Of Engineers Alleghany Edgecombe Lee Stokes
6508 Falls of the Neuse Road Ashe Franklin Nash Surry
Suite 120 Caswell Forsyth Northampton Vance
Raleigh, NC 27615 Chatham Granville Orange Wake
Telephone: [phone] Davidson Guilford Person Warren
Fax: [phone] Davie Halifax Randolph Wilkes
Washington Regulatory Field Office Beaufort Currituck Jones
US Army Corps Of Engineers Bertie Dare Lenoir
Post Office Box 1000 Camden Gates Martin
Washington, NC 27889-1000 Carteret* Green Pamlico
Telephone: [phone] Chowan Hertford Pasquotank
Fax: [phone] Craven Hyde Perquimans
Wilmington Regulatory Field Office
US Army Corps Of Engineers
Post Office Box 1890
Wilmington, NC 28402-1890
Anson Duplin Onslow
Bladen Harnett Pender
Brunswick Hoke, Richmond
Carteret Montgomery Robeson
Pitt
Tyrrell
Washington
Wayne
cy?b
Union
Watauga
Yancey
Wilson
Yadkin
*Croatan National Forest Only
Page 11 of 12
Office Use Only: Form Version April 2001
USACE Action ID No. DWQ No.
If any particular item is not applicable to this project, please enter "Not Applicable" or "N/A" rather than
leaving the space blank. ss
1. Processing
APR ` 32002
1. Check all of the approval(s) requested for this project:
? Section 404 Permit WETLANDS GPOUP
? Section 10 Permit WATER QUALITY SECTION
® 401 Water Quality Certification
® Riparian or Watershed Buffer Rules
2. Nationwide, Regional or General Permit Number(s) Requested:
3. If this notification is solely a courtesy copy because written approval for the 401 Certification
is not required, check here: ?
4. If payment into the North Carolina Wetlands Restoration Program (NC)VRP) is proposed for
mitigation of impacts (see section VIII Mitigation), check here: ?
II. Applicant Information
1. Owner/Applicant Information
Name: The Manson Company, Inc.
Mailing Address: 21 Stoneridge Circle, Durham, NC 27705
Telephone Number: [phone] Fax Number:
E-mail Address:
2. Agent Information (A signed and dated copy of the Agent Authorization letter must be
attached if the Agent has signatory authority for the owner/applicant.)
Name:
Company Affiliation:
Mailing Address:
Telephone Number:
E-mail Address:
Fax Number:
Page 3 of 12
III. Project Information
Attach a vicinity map clearly showing the location of the property with respect to local
landmarks such as towns, rivers, and roads. Also provide a detailed site plan showing property
boundaries and development plans in relation to surrounding properties. Both the vicinity map
and site plan must include a scale and north arrow. The specific footprints of all buildings,
impervious surfaces, or other facilities must be included. If possible, the maps and plans should
include the appropriate USGS Topographic Quad Map and NRCS Soil Survey with the property
boundaries outlined. Plan drawings, or other maps may be included at the applicant's discretion,
so long as the property is clearly defined. For administrative and distribution purposes, the
USACE requires information to be submitted on sheets no larger than 11 by 17-inch format;
however, DWQ may accept paperwork of any size. DWQ prefers full-size construction
drawings rather than a sequential sheet version of the full-size plans. If full-size plans are
reduced to a small scale such that the final version is illegible, the applicant will be informed that
the project has been placed on hold until decipherable maps are provided.
1. Name of project: Eno Forest (formerly Village by the Eno)
2. T.I.P. Project Number (NCDOT Only)
NA
3. Property Identification Number (Tax PIN): 0814-04-84-7223 & 0814-04-84-8730
4. Location
County: Durham Nearest Town: Durham
Subdivision name (include phase/lot number): Eno Forest
Directions to site (include road numbers, landmarks, etc.):
4213 Guess Road (SR 1003), Durham, NC 27712
5. Site coordinates, if available (UTM or Lat/Long): NA
(Note - If project is linear, such as a road or utility line, attach a sheet that separately lists the
coordinates for each crossing of a distinct waterbody.)
6. Describe the existing land use or condition of the site at the time of this application:
Wooded with residential use
7. Property size (acres):
8. Nearest body of water (stream/river/sound/ocean/lake): Eno River
9. River Basin: Neuse River
(Note - this must be one of North Carolina's seventeen designated major river basins. The
River Basin map is available at http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/admin/maps/.)
Page 4 of 12
10. Describe the purpose of the proposed work: Road construction.
11. List the type of equipment to be used to construct the project:
Grading and paving equipment.
12. Describe the land use in the vicinity of this project: Residential uses and a state park.
IV. Prior Project History
If jurisdictional determinations and/or permits have been requested and/or obtained for this
project (including all prior phases of the same subdivision) in the past, please explain. Include
the USACE Action ID Number, DWQ Project Number, application date, and date permits and
certifications were issued or withdrawn. Provide photocopies of previously issued permits,
certifications or other useful information. Describe previously approved wetland, stream and
buffer impacts, along with associated mitigation (where applicable). If this is a NCDOT project,
list and describe permits issued for prior segments of the same T.I.P. project, along with
construction schedules.
Important stream evaluation was performed 8/7/01. See attachment.
USACE ACTION ID: 2001121300
V. Future Project Plans
Are any additional permit requests anticipated for this project in the future?
anticipated work, and provide justification for the exclusion of this work
application: No.
VI. Proposed Impacts to Waters of the United States/Waters of the State
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
wetlands, open water, and stream channels associated with the project. The applicant must also
provide justification for these impacts in Section VII below. All proposed impacts, permanent
and temporary, must be listed herein, and must be clearly identifiable on an accompanying site
plan. All wetlands and waters, and all streams (intermittent and perennial) must be shown on a
delineation map, whether or not impacts are proposed to these systems. Wetland and stream
evaluation and delineation forms should be included as appropriate. Photographs may be
included at the applicant's discretion. If this proposed impact is strictly for wetland or stream
mitigation, list and describe the impact in Section VIII below. If additional space is needed for
listing or description, please attach a separate sheet.
If so, describe the
from the current
Page 5 of 12
1. Wetland Impacts
Wetland Impact
Site Number
(indicate on map)
Type of Impact* Area of
Impact
(acres) Located within
100-year Floodplain**
(yes/no) Distance to
Nearest Stream
(linear feet)
Type of Wetland***

* List each impact separately and identify temporary impacts. Impacts include, but are not limited to: mechanized clearing, grading, fill,
excavation, flooding, ditching/drainage, etc. For dams, separately list impacts due to both structure and flooding.
** 100-Year floodplains are identified through the Federal Emergency Management Agency's (FEMA) Flood Insurance Rate Maps
(FIRM), or FEMA-approved local floodplain maps. Maps are available through the FEMA Map Service Center at 1-800-358-9616, or
online at http://www.fema.gov.
*** List a wetland type that best describes wetland to be impacted (e.g., freshwater/saltwater marsh, forested wetland, beaver pond,
Carolina Bay, bog, etc.)
List the total acreage (estimated) of existing wetlands on the property: NA.
Total area of wetland impact proposed:
2. Stream Impacts, including all intermittent and perennial streams
Stream Impact
Site Number
(indicate on map)
Type of Impact* Length of
Impact
(linear feet)
Stream Name** Average Width
of Stream
Before Impact Perennial or
Intermittent?
(pleasespecify)
1 Culvert 150 UT - Eno River 6' Perennial

* List each impact separately and identify temporary impacts. Impacts include, but are not limited to: culverts and associated rip-rap,
dams (separately list impacts due to both structure and flooding), relocation (include linear feet before and after, and net loss/gain),
stabilization activities (cement wall, rip-rap, crib wall, gabions, etc.), excavation, ditching/straightening, etc. If stream relocation is
proposed, plans and profiles showing the linear footprint for both the original and relocated streams must be included.
** Stream names can be found on USGS topographic maps. If a stream has no name, list as UT (unnamed tributary) to the nearest
downstream named stream into which it flows. USGS maps are available through the USGS at 1-800-358-9616, or online at
www.usgs.gov. Several intemet sites also allow direct download and printing of USGS maps (e.g., www.topozone.com,
www.mapquest.com, etc.).
Cumulative impacts (linear distance in feet) to all streams on site: 150
Page 6 of 12
3. Open Water Impacts, including Lakes, Ponds, Estuaries, Sounds, Atlantic Ocean and any
other Water of the U.S.
Open Water Impact
Site Number
(indicate on map)
Type of Impact* Area of
Impact
(acres) Name of Waterbody
(if applicable) Type of Waterbody
(lake, pond, estuary, sound,
bay, ocean, etc.)

* List each impact separately and identify temporary impacts. Impacts include, but are not limited to: fill, excavation, dredging,
flooding, drainage, bulkheads, etc.
4. Pond Creation
If construction of a pond is proposed, associated wetland and stream impacts should be
included above in the wetland and stream impact sections. Also, the proposed pond should
be described here and illustrated on any maps included with this application.
Pond to be created in (check all that apply): ® uplands ? stream ? wetlands
Describe the method of construction (e.g., dam/embankment, excavation, installation of
draw-down valve or spillway, etc.): Dam/embankment, excavation, and installation of
spillways
Proposed use or purpose of pond (e.g., livestock watering, irrigation, aesthetic, trout pond,
local stormwater requirement, etc.): Local stormwater requirement.
Size of watershed draining to pond: (1)0.7 ac.; (2)7.1 ac.; (3)3.8 ac.; (4)8.6 ac.; (5)-25.5 ac.
Expected pond surface area: (1)962 sf; (2)2,201 sf; (3)4,244 sf, (4)5,578 sf, (5)5,967 sf
VII. Impact Justification (Avoidance and Minimization)
Specifically describe measures taken to avoid the proposed impacts. It may be useful to provide
information related to site constraints such as topography, building ordinances, accessibility, and
financial viability of the project. The applicant may attach drawings of alternative, lower-impact
site layouts, and explain why these design options were not feasible. Also discuss how impacts
were minimized once the desired site plan was developed. If applicable, discuss construction
techniques to be followed during construction to reduce impacts.
Crossing the stream is the only way to access that portion of the property.
Page 7 of 12
VIII. Mitigation
DWQ - In accordance with 15A NCAC 2H .0500, mitigation may be required by the NC
Division of Water Quality for projects involving greater than or equal to one acre of impacts to
freshwater wetlands or greater than or equal to 150 linear feet of total impacts to perennial
streams.
USACE - In accordance with the Final Notice of Issuance and Modification of Nationwide
Permits, published in the Federal Register on March 9, 2000, mitigation will be required when
necessary to ensure that adverse effects to the aquatic environment are minimal. Factors
including size and type of proposed impact and function and relative value of the impacted
aquatic resource will be considered in determining acceptability of appropriate and practicable
mitigation as proposed. Examples of mitigation that may be appropriate and practicable include,
but are not limited to: reducing the size of the project; establishing and maintaining wetland
and/or upland vegetated buffers to protect open waters such as streams; and replacing losses of
aquatic resource functions and values by creating, restoring, enhancing, or preserving similar
functions and values, preferable in the same watershed.
If mitigation is required for this project, a copy of the mitigation plan must be attached in order
for USACE or DWQ to consider the application complete for processing. Any application
lacking a required mitigation plan or NCWRP concurrence shall be placed on hold as
incomplete. An applicant may also choose to review the current guidelines for stream restoration
in DWQ's Draft Technical Guide for Stream Work in North Carolina, available at
htlp://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands/strmgide.html.
Provide a brief description of the proposed mitigation plan. The description should provide
as much information as possible, including, but not limited to: site location (attach directions
and/or map, if offsite), affected stream and river basin, type and amount (acreage/linear feet)
of mitigation proposed (restoration, enhancement, creation, or preservation), a plan view,
preservation mechanism (e.g., deed restrictions, conservation easement, etc.), and a
description of the current site conditions and proposed method of construction. Please attach
a separate sheet if more space is needed.
NA.
Page 8 of 12
2. Mitigation may also be made by payment into the North Carolina Wetlands Restoration
Program (NCWRP) with the NCWRP's written agreement. Check the box indicating that
you would like to pay into the NCWRP. Please note that payment into the NCWRP must be
reviewed and approved before it can be used to satisfy mitigation requirements. Applicants
will be notified early in the review process by the 401/Wetlands Unit if payment into the
NCWRP is available as an option. For additional information regarding the application
process for the NCWRP, check the NCWRP website at http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/wW/index.htm. If
use of the NCWRP is proposed, please check the appropriate box on page three and provide
the following information:
Amount of stream mitigation requested (linear feet): NA.
Amount of buffer mitigation requested (square feet): NA.
Amount of Riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres): NA.
Amount of Non-riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres): NA.
Amount of Coastal wetland mitigation requested (acres): NA.
IX. Environmental Documentation (DWQ Only)
Does the project involve an expenditure of public funds or the use of public (federal/state/local)
land?
Yes ? No
If yes, does the project require preparation of an environmental document pursuant to the
requirements of the National or North Carolina Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
Note: If you are not sure whether a NEPA/SEPA document is required, call the SEPA
coordinator at [phone] to review current thresholds for environmental documentation.
Yes ? No ?
If yes, has the document review been finalized by the State Clearinghouse? If so, please attach a
copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval letter.
Yes ? No ?
X. Proposed Impacts on Riparian and Watershed Buffers (DWQ Only)
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
required state and local buffers associated with the project. The applicant must also provide
justification for these impacts in Section VII above. All proposed impacts must be listed herein,
and must be clearly identifiable on the accompanying site plan. All buffers must be shown on a
map, whether or not impacts are proposed to the buffers. Correspondence from the DWQ
Regional Office may be included as appropriate. Photographs may also be included at the
applicant's discretion.
Will the project impact protected riparian buffers identified within 15A NCAC 2B .0233
(Meuse), 15A NCAC 2B .0259 (Tar-Pamlico), 15A NCAC 2B .0250 (Randleman Rules and
Water Supply Buffer Requirements), or other (please identify )?
Page 9 of 12
Yes ® No ? If you answered "yes", provide the following information:
Identify the square feet and acreage of impact to each zone of the riparian buffers. If buffer
mitigation is required calculate the required amount of mitigation by applying the buffer
multipliers.
Zone* Impact
(square feet) Multiplier Required
Mitigation
1 8,450 3
2 5,286 1.5
Total 13,736
* Zone 1 extends out 30 feet perpendicular from near bank of channel; "Lone 2 extends an
additional 20 feet from the edge of Zone 1.
If buffer mitigation is required, please discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (i.e., Donation
of Property, Conservation Easement, Riparian Buffer Restoration / Enhancement, Preservation or
Payment into the Riparian Buffer Restoration Fund). Please attach all appropriate information as
identified within 15A NCAC 2B .0242 or .0260.
XI. Stormwater (DWQ Only)
Describe impervious acreage (both existing and proposed) versus total acreage on the site.
Discuss stormwater controls proposed in order to protect surface waters and wetlands
downstream from the property.
The existing impervious surface is 2.59%. The proposed maximum impervious surface is 24%.
Rip-rap will be used at all outlets. Level spreaders will be used at all detention ponds.
XII. Sewage Disposal (DWQ Only)
Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of
wastewater generated from the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
The wastewater generated by the proposed project will be pumped away from the site.
XIII. Violations (DWQ Only)
Is this site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500) or any Buffer Rules?
Yes ? No
Is this an after-the-fact permit application?
Page 10 of 12
Yes ? No
XIV. Other Circumstances (Optional):
It is the applicant's responsibility to submit the application sufficiently in advance of desired
construction dates to allow processing time for these permits. However, an applicant may
choose to list constraints associated with construction or sequencing that may impose limits on
work schedules (e.g., draw-down schedules for lakes, dates associated with Endangered and
Threatened Species, accessibility problems, or other issues outside of the applicant's control).
NA
?r/g, eom PA.)1, INC-
.
Applicant/Agent's Signature ate
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant is provided.)
US Army Corps Of Engineers Field Offices and County Coverage
Asheville Regulatory Field Office Alexander Cherokee Iredell Mitchell
US Army Corps of Engineers Avery Clay Jackson Polk
151 Patton Avenue Buncombe Cleveland Lincoln Rowan
Room 208 Burke Gaston Macon Rutherford
Asheville, NC. 28801-5006 Cabamrs Graham Madison Stanley
Telephone: [phone] Caldwell Haywood McDowell Swain
Fax: [phone] Catawba Henderson Mecklenburg Transylvania
Raleigh Regulatory Field Office Alamance Durham Johnston Rockingham
LJS Army Corps Of Engineers Alleghany Edgecombe Lee Stokes
6508 Falls of the Neuse Road Ashe Franklin Nash Surry
Suite 120 Caswell Forsyth Northampton Vance
Raleigh, NC 27615 Chatham Granville Orange Wake
Telephone: [phone] Davidson Guilford Person Warren
Fax: [phone] Davie Halifax Randolph Wilkes
Washington Regulatory Field Office Beaufort Currituck Jones
US Army Corps Of Engineers Bertie Dare Lenoir
Post Office Box 1000 Camden Gates Martin
Washington, NC 27889-1000 Carteret* Green Pamlico
Telephone: [phone] Chowan Hertford Pasquotank
Fax: [phone] Craven Hyde Perquimans
Wilmington Regulatory Field Office
US Army Corps Of Engineers
Post Office Box 1890
Wilmington, NC 28402-1890
Anson Duplin Onslow
Bladen Harnett Pender
Brunswick Hoke, Richmond
Carteret Montgomery Robeson
Pitt
Tyrrell
Washington
Wayne
6D2
Union
Watauga
Yancey
Wilson
Yadkin
*Croatan National Forest Only
Page 11 of 12
,OF wATFq Michael F. Easley
`O\ QG Governor
C? William G. Ross, Jr., Secretary
Department of -Environment and Natural Resources
4 `C Gregory J. Thorpe, Ph.D., Acting Director
Division of Water Quality
April 1, 2002
Durham County
DWQ Project No. 01-1492
CERTIFIED MAIL: RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
William D. Cardin
The Manson Company, Inc.
21 Stoneridge Circle
Durham, NC, 27705
Dear Mr. Cardin:
On February 11, 2002, the NC Division of Water Quality receivgd your additional application materials for your proposal to impact
192 linear feet of streams, and 23,958 square feet of Neuse Buffers in order to construct the proposed Village By the Eno Subdivision in .
Durham County. You have requested a 401 Water Quality Certification and approval under the Neuse Buffer Rules. In accordance with
15A NCAC 2H .0506, a thorough inspection of the site has been conducted by Mr. Steve Mitchell of the DWQ Raleigh Regional Office
and by Mr. Dave Penrose and Ms. Cyndi Karoly of the DWQ Central Office in Raleigh. Based on this review, we have determined that
significant uses would be removed or degraded by this project. It is still unclear from the site visit or from your application where precisely
all the proposed stream and buffer impacts would be located. Therefore, we have determined that insufficient information has been
provided in order for us to complete our review. Specifically, please provide the following information so that we can complete our review
of your application:
Does the 192-linear foot calculation include all inlet and outlet stream stabilization measures? If not, these structures (such as rip-
rap) must be included in your calculations;
We understand that you are delaying design of your stormwater management plan pending feasibility studies on the site. We must
reiterate that you are required to provide site-specific stormwater details, specifically with respect to the Neuse Buffers, in order for us
to complete our review;
In your application, you stated that the stream you propose to impact is intermittent. Based upon a field review conducted by my staff
on March 28, 2002, we have determined that the stream in question is clearly perennial. As such, cumulative impacts of 150 linear
feet or more will require mitigation. A copy of our biological reconnaissance form is attached for your information.
Since the stream impacts associated with this project exceed 150 linear feet, compensatory stream mitigation will be required for
this project in accordance with 15A NCAC 2H .0506(h). You have the following options for satisfying the stream mitigation requirement
associated with this project:
1. Payment into the North Carolina Wetland Restoration Program (W RP), if the W RP will accept the responsibility for conducting this
mitigation work, or
2. Preparing and implementing a stream mitigation plan.
Please note that your application will be considered incomplete until a detailed mitigation plan including a 1:1 stream restoration
component is forwarded to this office. We strongly suggest that you locate a mitigation site within the same river sub-basin as your
project. At this time we are unable to conclusively determine the stream (and possibly buffer) mitigation requirements due to the lack of
clarity in the application with respect to stream stabilization measures and buffer impact locations. We strongly suggest that you schedule
a meeting with staff of the DWQ Central Office (Cyndi Karoly and Bob Zarzecki) and Steve Mitchell of the Raleigh Regional Office so that
we may clarify the scope of impacts associated with this project, and make a determination as to mitigation requirements.
If you decide to propose use of the Wetland Restoration Program in lieu of developing your own stream mitigation
plan, you will need to notify this office in writing in your response, and we will contact the W RP on your behalf to see if they will accept
the project. You should note that mitigation requirements proposed to be mitigated through the Wetland Restoration Program must be
rounded to the nearest linear foot increment according to 15 2r .0503(b).
By copy of this letter, I am notifying the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers that this project should be placed on hold. Thank you for your
attention. If you have any questions, please contact Steve Mitchell in our Raleigh Regional Office at [phone] or Cyndi Karoly in
Raleigh at [phone].
North Carolina Division of Water Quality, 401 Wetlands Certification Unit, J /
1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1650 (Mailing Address) V
2321 Crabtree Blvd., Raleigh, NC 27604-2260 (Location)
919-733-1786 (phone), 919-733-6893 (fax), http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetiands/
Page-42 of :2 .
cc: Coij _• o'`Ingineers Raleigh Regulatory Field Office
Rake:gh DWQ Regional Office
Fila :.:opy
Central Files
Bob Zarzecki
Lynnise M. Hawes/Stephen Ballentine, 1000 Corporate Drive, Suite 101, Hillsborough, NC, 27278
011492
Biological Reconnaissance Form # 4:??U_
BIOLOGICAL RECONNAISANCE FORM
Perennial/Intermittent Point
Send to Dave Penrose
401/Wetlands Unit, Division of Water Quality
1650 Mail Services Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1621
e-mail Dj,.e.PenroseCNCmail.net, FAX [phone]
a) Location Eno Forest Subdivision
Stream Name: UT Eno river Receiving Waterbody: Eno river
Location/Road: Guess Rd County: Durham Date: 28 March 2002 Regional Office: RRO
Basin: Neuse Subbasin: 030401 Latitude/Longitude:
Ecoregion: Slate Belt Rosgen Class: Observers: DP/CK USGS Quad Sheet: Northwest
Durham
Notes (attach photograph or drawing on the back of this form): the UT is located directed behind the road to the power
station. Collection site was near the manhole at the bend in the road.
b) Habitat -
Primary Adjacent Land Use: Forest Riparian Zone Characteristics: Hardwood
(Maple/Beech/Sycamore)
Stream Width: > one ( Flow Conditions: high, clear Stream Order: first
meter =
Stream Permanence Characteristics. Rating (if relevant): Good riffle/pool sequence, Good bed and bank characteristics,
angled rocks typical of the slate belt ecoregion. Much of the substrate had macrophytes growing on it (Podostomum?),
with some algae. Fairly deep pools.
c) Biology
Benthic Macroinvertebrate Taxa: Mayfly - Ameletus, Caddisfly - Dolophilodes
Amphipoda: X Isopoda: ? Decapoda: X Chironomidae: X Oligochaeta: ? Mollusca: ?
Ephemeroptera: X Plecoptera: ? Trichoptera: X Coleoptera: ? Other Diptera: ?
Fish and Salamander Taxa: Salamanders were present.
Other Observations (i.e. Presence of Iron Oxidizing Bacteria): Strongly perennial system typical of the slate belt
ecoregion. Flow may be reduced or eliminated during very low flow periods of late summer, early fall. However there
is a good likelihood that the ground .rater and hyporheic zones are good.
Q ,
Office Use Only: 01 1 4 9 2Form Version April 2001
USACE Action ID No. DWQ No.
If any particular item is not applicable to this project, please enter "Not Applicable" or "N/A" rather than
leaving the space blank.
I. Processing
1. Check all of the approval(s) requested for this project:
? Section 404 Permit
? Section 10 Permit
® 401 Water Quality Certification
® Riparian or Watershed Buffer Rules
2. Nationwide, Regional or General Permit Number(s) Requested: 39
3. If this notification is solely a courtesy copy because written approval for the 401 Certification
is not required, check here: ?
4. If payment into the North Carolina Wetlands Restoration Program (NCWRP) is proposed for
mitigation of impacts (see section VIII,- Mitigation), check here: ?
II. Applicant Information
1. Owner/Applicant Information
Name: The Manson Company, Inc.
Mailing Address: 21 Stoneridge Circle, Durham, NC 27705
Telephone Number: [phone] Fax Number:
E-mail Address:
2. Agent Information (A signed and dated copy of the Agent Authorization letter must be
attached if the Agent has signatory authority for the owner/applicant.)
Name:
Company Affiliation:
Mailing Address:
Telephone Number: Fax Number:
E-mail Address:
Page 3 of 12
RECI
III. Project Information
Attach a vicinity map clearly showing the location of the property with respect to local
landmarks such as towns, rivers, and roads. Also provide a detailed site plan showing property
boundaries and development plans in relation to surrounding properties. Both the vicinity map
and site plan must include a scale and north arrow. The specific footprints of all buildings,
impervious surfaces, or other facilities must be included. If possible, the maps and plans should
include the appropriate USGS Topographic Quad Map and NRCS Soil Survey with the property
boundaries outlined. Plan drawings, or other maps may be included at the applicant's discretion,
so long as the property is clearly defined. For administrative and distribution purposes, the
USACE requires information to be submitted on sheets no larger than 11 by 17-inch format;
however, DWQ may accept paperwork of any size. DWQ prefers full-size construction
drawings rather than a sequential sheet version of the full-size plans. If full-size plans are
reduced to a small scale such that the final version is illegible, the applicant will be informed that
the project has been placed on hold until decipherable maps are provided.
1. Name of project: Village By the Eno
2. T.I.P. Project Number (NCDOT Only):
3. Property Identification Number (Tax PIN): 0814-04-84-7223 & 0814-04-84-8730
4. Location
County: Durham Nearest Town: Durham
Subdivision name (include phase/lot number): Village By the Eno
Directions to site (include road numbers, landmarks, etc.):
4213 Guess Road (SR 1003), Durham, NC 277
5. Site coordinates, if available (UTM or Lat/Long): NA
(Note - If project is linear, such as a road or utility line, attach a sheet that separately lists the
coordinates for each crossing of a distinct waterbody.)
6. Describe the existing land use or condition of the site at the time of this application:
Wooded with residential use
7. Property size (acres):
30.34
8. Nearest body of water (stream/river/sound/ocean/lake): Eno River
9. River Basin: Neuse River
(Note - this must be one of North Carolina's seventeen designated major river basins. The
River Basin map is available at http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/admin/mgps/.)
Page 4 of 12
10. Describe the purpose of the proposed work: Road and driveway construction.
11. List the type of equipment to be used to construct the project:
Grading and paving equipment.
12. Describe the land use in the vicinity of this project: Residential uses and a state park.
IV. Prior Project History
If jurisdictional determinations and/or permits have been requested and/or obtained for this
project (including all prior phases of the same subdivision) in the past, please explain. Include
the USACE Action ID Number, DWQ Project Number, application date, and date permits and
certifications were issued or withdrawn. Provide photocopies of previously issued permits,
certifications or other useful information. Describe previously approved wetland, stream and
buffer impacts, along with associated mitigation (where applicable). If this is a NCDOT project,
list and describe permits issued for prior segments of the same T.I.P. project, along with
construction schedules.
Intermittent stream evaluation was performed 8/7/01. See attachment.
USACE ACTION ID: 2001121300
V. Future Project Plans
Are any additional permit requests anticipated for this project in the future? If so, describe the
anticipated work, and provide justification for the exclusion of this work from the current
application: No.
VI. Proposed Impacts to Waters of the United States/Waters of the State
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
wetlands, open water, and stream channels associated with the project. The applicant must also
provide justification for these impacts in Section VII below. All proposed impacts, permanent
and temporary, must be listed herein, and must be clearly identifiable on an accompanying site
plan. All wetlands and waters, and all streams (intermittent and perennial) must be shown on a
delineation map, whether or not impacts are proposed to these systems. Wetland and stream
evaluation and delineation forms should be included as appropriate. Photographs may be
included at the applicant's discretion. If this proposed impact is strictly for wetland or stream
mitigation, list and describe the impact in Section VIII below. If additional space is needed for
listing or description, please attach a separate sheet.
Page 5 of 12
1. Wetland Impacts
Wetland Impact
Site Number
(indicate on map)
Type of Impact* Area of
Impact
(acres) Located within
100-year Floodplain**
(yes/no) Distance to
Nearest Stream
(linear feet)
Type of Wetland***

* List each impact separately and identify temporary impacts. Impacts include, but are not limited to: mechanized clearing, grading, till,
excavation, flooding, ditching/drainage, etc. For dams, separately list impacts due to both structure and flooding.
** 100-Year floodplains are identified through the Federal Emergency Management Agency's (FEMA) Flood Insurance Rate Maps
(FIRM), or FEMA-approved local floodplain maps. Maps are available through the FEMA Map Service Center at 1-800-358-9616, or
online at http://www.fema'gov.
*** List a wetland type that best describes wetland to be impacted (e.g., freshwater/saltwater marsh, forested wetland, beaver pond,
Carolina Bay, bog, etc.)
List the total acreage (estimated) of existing wetlands on the property: NA.
Total area of wetland impact proposed:
2. Stream Impacts, including all intermittent and perennial streams
Stream Impact
Site Number
(indicate on map)
Type of Impact* Length of
Impact
(linear feet)
Stream Name** Average Width
of Stream
Before Impact Perennial or
Intermittent?
(please specify)
1 Culvert 144 UT - Eno River 6' Intermittent
2 Culvert 48 UT - Eno River 6' Intermittent

* List each impact separately and identify temporary impacts. Impacts include, but are not limited to: culverts and associated rip-rap,
dams (separately list impacts due to both structure and flooding), relocation (include linear feet before and after, and net loss/gain),
stabilization activities (cement wall, rip-rap, crib wall, gabions, etc.), excavation, ditching/straightening, etc. If stream relocation is
proposed, plans and profiles showing the linear footprint for both the original and relocated streams must be included.
** Stream names can be found on USGS topographic maps. If a stream has no name, list as UT (unnamed tributary) to the nearest
downstream named stream into which it flows. USGS maps are available through the USGS at 1-800-358-9616, or online at
www.usgs.gov. Several internet sites also allow direct download and printing of USGS maps (e.g., www.topozone.com,
www.manauest.com, etc.).
Cumulative impacts (linear distance in feet) to all streams on site: 192
Page 6 of 12
3. Open Water Impacts, including Lakes, Ponds, Estuaries, Sounds, Atlantic Ocean and any
other Water of the U.S.
Open Water Impact
Site Number
(indicate on map)
Type of Impact* Area of
Impact
(acres) Name of Waterbody

(if applicable) Type of Waterbody
(lake, pond, estuary, sound,
bay, ocean, etc.)

* List each impact separately and identify temporary impacts. Impacts include, but are not limited to: fill, excavation, dredging,
flooding, drainage, bulkheads, etc.
4. Pond Creation
If construction of a pond is proposed, associated wetland and stream impacts should be
included above in the wetland and stream impact sections. Also, the proposed pond should
be described here and illustrated on any maps included with this application.
Pond to be created in (check all that apply): ? uplands ? stream ? wetlands
Describe the method of construction (e.g., dam/embankment, excavation, installation of
draw-down valve or spillway, etc.):
Proposed use or purpose of pond (e.g., livestock watering, irrigation, aesthetic, trout pond,
local stormwater requirement, etc.):
Size of watershed draining to pond: Expected pond surface area:
VII. Impact Justification (Avoidance and Minimization)
Specifically describe measures taken to avoid the proposed impacts. It may be useful to provide
information related to site constraints such as topography, building ordinances, accessibility, and
financial viability of the project. The applicant may attach drawings of alternative, lower-impact
site layouts, and explain why these design options were not feasible. Also discuss how impacts
were minimized once the desired site plan was developed. If applicable, discuss construction
techniques to be followed during construction to reduce impacts.
One stream crossing with an access easement is being proposed to provide_access to four lots
instead of using individual access.
Page 7 of 12
VIII. Mitigation
DWQ - In accordance with 15A NCAC 2H .0500, mitigation may be required by the NC
Division of Water Quality for projects involving greater than or equal to one acre of impacts to
freshwater wetlands or greater than or equal to 150 linear feet of total impacts to perennial
streams.
USACE - In accordance with the Final Notice of Issuance and Modification of Nationwide
Permits, published in the Federal Register on March 9, 2000, mitigation will be required when
necessary to ensure that adverse effects to the aquatic environment are minimal. Factors
including size and type of proposed impact and function and relative value of the impacted
aquatic resource will be considered in determining acceptability of appropriate and practicable
mitigation as proposed. Examples of mitigation that may be appropriate and practicable include,
but are not limited to: reducing the size of the project; establishing and maintaining wetland
and/or upland vegetated buffers to protect open waters such as streams; and replacing losses of
aquatic resource functions and values by creating, restoring, enhancing, or preserving similar
functions and values, preferable in the same watershed.
If mitigation is required for this project, a copy of the mitigation plan must be attached in order
for USACE or DWQ to consider the application complete for processing. Any application
lacking a required mitigation plan or NCWRP concurrence shall be placed on hold as
incomplete. An applicant may also choose to review the current guidelines for stream restoration
in DWQ's Draft Technical Guide for Stream Work in North Carolina, available at
http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands/stnngide.html.
Provide a brief description of the proposed mitigation plan. The description should provide
as much information as possible, including, but not limited to: site location (attach directions
and/or map, if offsite), affected stream and river basin, type and amount (acreage/linear feet)
of mitigation proposed (restoration, enhancement, creation, or preservation), a plan view,
preservation mechanism (e.g., deed restrictions, conservation easement, etc.), and a
description of the current site conditions and proposed method of construction. Please attach
a separate sheet if more space is needed.
Page 8 of 12
2. Mitigation may also be made by payment into the North Carolina Wetlands Restoration
Program (NCWRP) with the NCWRP's written agreement. Check the box indicating that
you would like to pay into the NCWRP. Please note that payment into the NCWRP must be
reviewed and approved before it can be used to satisfy mitigation requirements. Applicants
will be notified early in the review process by the 401/Wetlands Unit if payment into the
NCWRP is available as an option. For additional information regarding the application
process for the NCWRP, check the NCWRP website at http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/w-M/index.htrn. If
use of the NCWRP is proposed, please check the appropriate box on page three and provide
the following information:
Amount of stream mitigation requested (linear feet): NA.
Amount of buffer mitigation requested (square feet): NA.
Amount of Riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres): NA.
Amount of Non-riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres): NA.
Amount of Coastal wetland mitigation requested (acres): NA.
IX. Environmental Documentation (DWQ Only)
Does the project involve an expenditure of public funds or the use of public (federal/state/local)
land?
Yes ? No
If yes, does the project require preparation of an environmental document pursuant to the
requirements of the National or North Carolina Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
Note: If you are not sure whether a NEPA/SEPA document is required, call the SEPA
coordinator at [phone] to review current thresholds for environmental documentation.
Yes ? No ?
If yes, has the document review been finalized by the State Clearinghouse? If so, please attach a
copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval letter.
Yes ? No ?
X. Proposed Impacts on Riparian and Watershed Buffers (DWQ Only)
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
required state and local buffers associated with the project. The applicant must also provide
justification for these impacts in Section VII above. All proposed impacts must be listed herein,
and must be clearly identifiable on the accompanying site plan. All buffers must be shown on a
map, whether or not impacts are proposed to the buffers. Correspondence from the DWQ
Regional Office may be included as appropriate. Photographs may also be included at the
applicant's discretion.
Will the project impact protected riparian buffers identified within 15A NCAC 2B .0233
(Meuse), 15A NCAC 2B .0259 (Tar-Pamlico), 15A NCAC 2B .0250 (Randleman Rules and
Water Supply Buffer Requirements), or other (please identify V
Yes ® No ? If you answered "yes", provide the following information:
Page 9 of 12
Identify the square feet and acreage of impact to each zone of the riparian buffers. If buffer
mitigation is required calculate the required amount of mitigation by applying the buffer
multipliers.
Zone* Impact
(square feet) Multiplier Required
Mitigation
1 14,375 3
2 9,583 1.5
Total 23,958
Zone 1 extends out 30 teet perpendicular trom near bank of channel; Gone z extends an
additional 20 feet from the edge of Zone 1.
If buffer mitigation is required, please discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (i.e., Donation
of Property, Conservation Easement, Riparian Buffer Restoration / Enhancement, Preservation or
Payment into the Riparian Buffer Restoration Fund). Please attach all appropriate information as
identified within 15A NCAC 2B .0242 or.0260.
XI. Stormwater (DWQ Only)
Describe impervious acreage (both existing and proposed) versus total acreage on the site.
Discuss stormwater controls proposed in order to protect surface waters and wetlands
downstream from the property.
The existing impervious surface is 2.59%. The proposed impervious surface can not exceed
24%. Rip-rap will be used at all outlets.
XII. Sewage Disposal (DWQ Only)
Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of
wastewater generated from the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
The wastewater generated by the proposed project will be pumped away from the site.
XIII. Violations (DWQ Only)
Is this site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H.0500) or any Buffer Rules?
Yes ? No
Is this an after-the-fact permit application?
Yes ? No
Page 10 of 12
XIV. Other Circumstances (Optional):
It is the applicant's responsibility to submit the application sufficiently in advance of desired
construction dates to allow processing time for these permits. However, an applicant may
choose to list constraints associated with construction or sequencing that may impose limits on
work schedules (e.g., draw-down schedules for lakes, dates associated with Endangered and
Threatened Species, accessibility problems, or other issues outside of the applicant's control).
NA.
UL C?,
Agent's Signature
Date
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant is provided.)
US Army Corps Of Engineers Field Offices and County Coverage
Asheville Regulatory Field Office Alexander Cherokee Iredell Mitchell
US Army Corps of Engineers Avery Clay Jackson Polk
151 Patton Avenue Buncombe Cleveland Lincoln Rowan
Room 208 Burke. Gaston Macon Rutherford
Asheville, NC 28801-5006 Cabarrus Graham Madison Stanley
Telephone: [phone] Caldwell Haywood McDowell Swain
Fax: [phone] Catawba Henderson Mecklenburg Transylvania
Raleigh Regulatory Field Office Alamance Durham Johnston Rockingham
US Army Corps Of Engineers Alleghany Edgecombe Lee Stokes
6508 Falls of the Neuse Road Ashe Franklin Nash Surry
Suite 120 Caswell Forsyth Northampton Vance
Raleigh, NC 27615 Chatham Granville Orange Wake
Telephone: [phone] Davidson Guilford Person Warren
Fax: [phone] Davie Halifax Randolph Wilkes
Washington Regulatory Field Office Beaufort Curntuck Jones
US Army Corps Of Engineers Bertie Dare Lenoir
Post Office Box 1000 Camden Gates Martin
Washington, NC 27889-1000 Carteret* Green Pamlico
Telephone: [phone] Chowan Hertford Pasquotank
Fax: [phone] Craven Hyde Perquimans
Wilmington Regulatory Field Office
US Army Corps Of Engineers
Post Office Box 1890
Wilmington, NC 28402-1890
Telephone: [phone]
Anson Duplin Onslow
Bladen Harnett Pender
Brunswick Hoke Richmond
Carteret Montgomery Robeson
Columbus Moore Sampson
Pitt
Tyrrell
Washington
Wayne
-6 r
Union
Watauga
Yancey
Wilson
Yadkin
*Croatan National Forest Only
Page 11 of 12
r
c it.•. J rr S k.+, .a
nz,
"rc_x'. •-u"' :: 3t ...?'? w - .ti. 77 7'; r? j^ s _ 'yc--i`
it a:a s = Fri
' t
Huckq?
Q N5
t .?.
-Lx
C Radi6.Towe ` s Awl e Mike ..
' \ r' 1 - 4 rya. f ti ¢ # f
n x P
_ f 7
laast!alie z I , ?l-
?-'`.1
-16
v _ -t
a13L
11C1arffiOO?2iR -...?? as
-. ?.,'? ?'' : i . "?-?. ?- ` F`AS3?3 ?`-?- 9a ?? ; ? I-? ?.a- i ?_ ?? _ axe ?4 ' _
4,
Golf Course ¢. s `}
Name: NORTHWEST DURHAM Location: 036° 02'52.3" N 078° 36,?o a `N
Date: 8/6/2001
Scale: 1 inch equals 2000 feet

Copynght (C) 1997, Maptecth. Inc
Sketch ma of wetland observation points
Property location:
4213 Guess Rd.
Durham Outside TWP., Durham Co., North Carolina
-a Obswvadw points
- stream
STREAM BUFFER: W WIDE UNDISTURBED STREAM
BUFFER EACH SIDE OF STREAM. MEASURED FROM TOP OF
BAWL
SITE
A
: 77591-013 PIN. 0814.048/-7773
TAX M
018 PIN
081494848!30
77501
:
TAX MAP:
-
41 ACRES
TOTALAREA• LOTH: 27 /
.
LOT2: 263ACRES
TWAL• 30UACRP3(1.321.846SF)

ZOWNQ R40
8 WATERSHED
E
09STRICT
T
RSHED ? 11
'•
-
:
WA
E
LIMITS. INSIDE A
I
CURRENT USE RESIOENTW.

/
/ •9 11
i/

doe
It

z 1
!/
f3 ,/.

600 S. Churton Street, Suite 93
Hillsborough, NC 27278
TS-MR
1 "= 200'

r-j

moo. wd ~ ta@IwM .. arelad b ew eaK Not
ft?xwvmay
DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION

Project /Site: 4213 Guess Road Date: 8/6/01
Applicant/Owner: Patricia and Bill Manson County: Durham
Investigator: F. Chandler & D. Chandler of Chandler Soil Consultants Inc. State: NC
Do normal circumstances exist on the site? ® Yes ? No Community ID:
Is the site significantly disturbed (atypical situation)? ? Yes ® No Transit ID:
Is the area a potential problem area? ? Yes ® No Plot ID: 7
(If needed, explain on reverse.)
r r.lrrJ l A 11V1?1
Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator Dominant Plant Species Stratum indicator
1. Liriodendron talipifera Tree FACU 9.
2. Pinus echinata Tree - 10.
3. Acer-rnbram Tree FAC 11.
4. Vibumum dentatt m°dentatum S/S OBL 12.
5. Carpinus carol' 'ana S/S FAC 13.
6. Comus florida S/S FACU 14.
T Polystichum acrostichoides Herb FAC 15.
8. Lyocopodium obscunun Herb FACU- 16.
Percent of dominant species that are OBL, FACW or FAC
(excluding FAC-).
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
? Recorded Data (Describe in Remarks) Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
? Stream, lake or tide gauge Primary indicators:
? Arial Photographs ? Inundated
? Other ? Saturated in upper 12 inches
® No recorded data available ? Water marks

® Drift lines
Field observations ® Sediment Deposits
? Drainage patterns in wetlands
Depth of surface water: (in.) Secondary indicators: (2 or more required)
Depth of free water in pit: (in.) ? Oxidized root channels in upper 12 inches
? Water-stained leaves
Depth to saturated soil: 17 (in.)
? Local soil survey data
? FAC neutral test
? Other (explain in remarks)
Remarks:
SOII.S
Map unit name
(Series and phase): Tatum gravelly silt loam 15-25% slopes Drainage class: well drained
Field observations
Taxonomy (Subgroup): Typic Hapludults Confirm mapped type? ? Yes ® No
Profile descriptions:
Depth Matrix colors Mottle colors Mottle
(inches) Horizon (Munsell moist) (Mussel moist) Abundancelcontrast Texrture, concretions, structures, eta
0-7 A I OYR 4/3 10YR 516 few, fine, distinct Sandy Loam; weak, fine, granular
7-10. E IOYR 5/4 1OYR 6/3 common, medium, faint Sandy Loam, weak, fine, subangular
10-17 Bt 10YR 4/4 2.5Y 6/2 common, medium, distinct Sandy Loam, weak, fine, subangular
17-19 Btg 10Y6/2 7.5YR 5/8 fine, common, distinct. Sandy Loam; weak, fine; subangular
Hydnc soil indicators:
? Histosol ? Concretations
? Histic epipedon ? High organic content in surface laver in sandy soil
? Sulfidic odor' ? Organic streaking in sandy soils
? Aquic moisture regime ? Listed on local hydric soils list
? Reducing conditions ? Listed on national hydric soils list
? Gleyed or low-chroma colors ? Other (explain in remarks)
Remarks: This soil appears at observation site 7.
WETLAND DETERMINATION
Hydorphytic vegetation present?
Wetland hydrology present?
Hydric soils present?
® Yes ? No
® Yes ? No
? Yes ® No
Is the sampling point within a wetland? ? Yes ® No

ACTION ID
INTERMITTENT CHANNEL ?? -
EVALUATION FORM
APPLICANT NAME Patricia and Bill Manson DATE 08/06/01
PROPOSED CHANNEL WORK (i.e., culvert, relocation, etc.)
WATERBODY/RIVER BASIN Neuse River Basin COUNTY/CITY Durham/Durham
RECENT WEATHER CONDITIONS Rained the Previous week
P SP NP Observation Comments or Description
P Fish/Shellfisb/Crustaceans Present Crayfish, minnows
Benthic Macro Invertebrates
P Amphibians PresentBreeding Small frogs, salamanders
NP Algae And/Or Fungus (water quality function)
P Wildlife Channel Use (i.e. tracks, feces, shells, others) Raccoon and deer tracks, garter snake, hawks
Federally Protected Species Present (Discontinue)
'
P Riffle/Pool Structure
SP Stable Streambanks
SP Channel Substrate
(i.e. gravel, cobble, rock, coarse sand) Coarse sand, gravel, cobbles
P Riparian Canopy Present (SP =h 5o% closure)
P Undercut Banks/Instream Habitat Structure
SP Flow In Channel
NP Wetlands Adjacent To/Contig. With Channel (Discontinue)
P Persistent Pools/Saturated Bottom
(June through Sept.)

F
T
- NP Seeps/Groundwater Discharge (June through Sept.)
P Adjacent Floodplain Present Near area # 1, there was some indication of previous inundation.
P Wrack Material or Drift Lines Near area a 1.
P Hydrophytic Vegetation in/adjacent to channel Microstegium vimineum, Boehmeria cvlindnea
Important To Domestic Water Supply? Y / N
Does Channel Appear On A Quad Or Soils Map? QY / N Approx. Drainage Area: 36 acres
lnaauiiiiiiinuniiimnimlaanriuanmmuiuuiinaiinamnlimumnnliiliniaininininininiannuiliuninaniiiuiniiunnnniuniaiiiimiiinniuiiiinuianinniluuiiuuai
Determination:
Perennial Channel (Stop) R Important Channel: LF PROJECT MGR Initials
Intermittent Channel (P) Unimportant Channel: LF
Ephemeral Channel (nojd) (attach map indicating location of important/unimportant channel)
Ditch Through Upland (nojd)
Evaluator's SigtaturQ? 6„p
(if other than C.U.E. project manager)
/ l l l / / 1 / l / / l / / / / l / / / / l / 1 / / / / / 1 / /
Biological Reconnaissance Form # mad
BIOLOGICAL RECONNAISANCE FORM
PerenniaVIntermittent Point
Send to Dave Penrose
401/Wetlands Unit, Division of Water Quality
1650 Mail Services Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1621
e-mail [e-mail], FAX [phone]
a) Location Eno Forest Subdivision
Stream Name: UT Eno river Receiving Waterbody: Eno river
Location/Road: Guess Rd County: Durham Date: 28 March 2002 7 Regional Office: RRO
Basin: Neuse Subbasin: 030401 Latitude/Longitude:
Ecoregion: Slate Belt Rosgen Class: Observers: DP/CK USGS Quad Sheet: Northwest
Durham
Notes (attach photograph or drawing on the back of this form): the UT is located directed behind the road to the power
station. Collection site was near the manhole at the bend in the road.
b) Habitat
Primary Adjacent Land Use: Forest Riparian Zone Characteristics: Hardwood
(Maple/Beech/Sycamore)
Stream Width: > one Flow Conditions: high, clear Stream Order: first
meter
Stream Permanence Characteristics, Rating (if relevant): Good riffle/pool sequence, Good bed and bank characteristics,
angled rocks typical of the slate belt ecoregion. Much of the substrate had macrophytes growing on it (Podostomum?),
with some algae. Fairly deep pools.
c) Biology
Benthic Macroinvertebrate Taxa: Mayfly - Ameletus, Caddisfly - Dolophilodes
Amphipoda: X Isopoda: ? Decapoda: X Chironomidae: X Oligochaeta: ? Mollusca: ?
Ephemeroptera: X Plecoptera: ? Trichoptera: X Coleoptera: ? Other Diptera: ?
Fish and Salamander Taxa: Salamanders were present.
Other Observations (i.e. Presence of Iron Oxidizing Bacteria): Strongly perennial system typical of the slate belt
ecoregion. Flow may be reduced or eliminated during very low flow periods of late summer, early fall. However there
is a good likelihood that the ground water and hyporheic zones are good.
Copyright (C) 1997, Maptech, Inc-

Re: Village By the Eno, Durham Co., 01-1492
Subject: Re: Village By the Eno, Durham Co., 01-1492
Date: Thu, 14 Mar 2002 07:56:33 -0500
From: Steve Mitchell <[e-mail]>
To: Cyndi Karoly <[e-mail]>
> Two individual xings. 144 looks like an underestimate. ie mitigation if
> over Construction drawings show no disapater and shows what looks like a
> drop inlet on to span. Smaller crsosing does not depict buffer
> correctly. It is squared off and therefore, calculations may be wrong.
> Need to address stormwater and hav_DP mI?e a callon'the large crossig
> I think it is perrenial and will require $$$. and deed
> notifications.

1 of 1 3/14/02 8:41 AM
MEMORANDUM
TO: John Dorney
Non-Discharge Branch
(46?)
Regional Contact: Steve Mitchell
WO Supervisor: Ken Schuster
Date:
SUBJECT: WETLAND STAFF REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS
Facility Name Village By The Eno c% The Manson Company
Project Number 01 1492
Recvd From APP
Received Date 10/12/01 Recvd By Region
Project Type residential / commercial
County DURHAM
County2
Region Raleigh
Certificates Stream Stream Impacts (ft.)
Permit Wetland Wetland Wetland Stream Class Acres Feet
Type Type Impact Score Index Prima Supp. Basin Req. Req. ME
39 Stream ©} D N I 27 2 wSTT HQw(- X0,401. T 192.00 ?- ??
NBR F__77 _@),N ?? F_F__30;-to, . F_ I
F_QY ON F-F-F-F-F-F-F- F_ F_?
Mitigation Wetland
MitigationType Type Acres Feet
Is Wetland Rating Sheet Attached? O Y O N Did you request more info? O Y O N
Have Project Changes/Conditions Been Discussed With Applicant? O Y O N
Is Mitigation required? O Y O N Recommendation: Issue O Issue/Coed O Deny
Provided by Region: Latitude (ddmmss) Longitude (ddmmss)
Comments:
16101 t
"AA,?
CC) l() 1
C CA" w ?,4
cc: Regional Office
Central Office Page Number 1
file:///Untitlec
Steve, this application, and the follow-up info, are rather confusing, so I want to make sure I'm interpreting
your staff report correctly.
The applicant reports two "intermittent" stream impacts of 144' and 48' on the PCN, then later states 192
feet of impact to "a" stream. Their drawings don't clearly show the impact LOCATIONS. Your staff
report says mitigation is necessary if they go over the 150' threshold. I am still unable to determine
positively if a) there is 192 feet cumulative on one stream or if this is two streams, b) if mitigation is
required (i.e. I think you're saying this is perennial, not intermittent). You've said it's ok to issue, so does
that mean there's two sites and/or the stream(s) are intermittent? They haven't proposed mitigation yet.
If you're recommending issuance without mitigation, I'll get it outa here. I'll likely add conditions for
stormwater, diffuse flow and deed notifications.
Please advise. Thanks.
__Q? ? / -qj
I of 1 3/13/02 3:47 M,
CALLEMYN • PARKER
A division of SEAR- BROWN
1000 CORPORATE DRIVE, SUITE 101
HILLSBOROUGH, NORTH CAROLINA 27278
[phone] Fax: [phone]
Letter Of Transmittal
TO D %J lS? X n or
We ?uw c)5 / '+01 O N 1 T DATE I I- 1 113101 PROJ. NO. 0() 7_o g
11050 MRIL SEIZUJICZ c..FNTEZ RE riNo 1-Ue6S )jvj O!-'1q-9z,
IZryIEIc;N NL a-7(, ci9- &Sy
ATTN V O VIN ?y 2 X1'u.1
WE ARE SENDING YOU [ Attached ? Under Separate Cover ? Transmitted Via
? Prints ? Reproducibles ? Specifications ? Shop Drawings
? Copy of Letter ? Change Order ?
COPIES DRAWING DATE DESCRIPTION
7 00-2a-04 /Z ID U l ITS /`I'I4/a

TRANSMITTED
al/For Approval ? As Requested
FIL E
? For Your Use
or Review and Comment
COMMENTS
COPY TO
with (?) Enc.
with (?) Enc. SIGNED
-01-11I (03/01)
SEAR•BROWN
The Summit at Meadowlands
1000 Corporate Drive, Suite 101
Hillsborough, NC 27278
co STR ;, , 919.732.3883 phone
919.732.6676 fax
www.searbrown.com
December 10, 2001
To: John Dorney
From: Lynnise Hawes
Subject: Eno Forest Subdivision (Village By the Eno)
DWQ #01-1492
Dear Sir:
Enclosed is a copy of the revised site map with all streams shown. The project will not disturb the
area (see previous submittal).
Thank you,
Lynnise Hawes

API if ?>' ?
fz
i°
401 s for February
Subject: 401s for February
Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2002 13:01:05 -0500
From: Milt Rhodes <[e-mail]>
To: [e-mail]
CC: Cyndi Karoly <[e-mail]>
Mike:
Sorry for the delay.
Here are my comments.
020179 - Deck shown in sketch must be water dependent in order to be
constructed within the specified water supply watershed setback (buffer
requirement). From the sketch it is difficult to determine whether the deck is
within the minimum setback. The sketch indicates a deck at 100 sf. A deck is
not a water dependent structure by definition, therefore we ask that the deck
be placed outside of the minimum water supply watershed setback as defined in
the local ordinance for the lake. If the deck serves as access to the walkway,
we request that the deck be sized to no larger than needed to provide this
accessibility, and the deck must remain uncovered.
020157 - No comment
020168 - No comment - Lake James is not a WS Watershed, however, the county has
established ordinances to better protect the lake. The 8' foot pathway is
larger than would be allowed in WS watersheds, and the applicant should check
with the local government to determine if the pathway plans are consistent with
local ordinances.
011492 Please notify us when final plans come in.
020129 - Road crossings do not appear to have been avoided or minimized. These
are public roads, I presume, therefore they should reduce all avoidable impacts
to the buffer areas and stream features. In addition, the NC DOT allows for
road widths to be reduced when the TND road guidelines are utilized. If the
roads have not been designed using these standards, then the applicant should
consider utilizing these guidelines to help reduce stream crossing impacts.
Additionally, I am interested in whether bottomless culverts could be utilized
on the stream crossing to minimized disturbance of channels. (See Designing
Highway Culverts That Do Not Impede the Movements of Resident Fish Species
http://www.usroads.com/journals/p/rej/9711/re971102.htm for more information.)
020221 - No comment - I guess now is the time to dredge, although he may need
to dredge deeper, as it looks like it will be a dry summer.
020222 - The site doesn't appear to have a stabilzation need, therefore we
question whether a stabilization of the stream (lake) bank is necessary. We
recommend, as this shoreline illustrates a very gradual slope utilizing a lower
impact stabilization technique, perhaps incorporating a sandy beach style
shoreline, as opposed to the harder structure "seawall with backfill" as
proposed. In addition, the pictures attached to the application indicate that
gravel (rock) has been deposited within the water supply watershed protection
buffer setback zone associated with Lake Norman. The rules state that no new
impervious surfaces are allowed within this zone, and specifically mentions
gravel being an impervious surface. The material illustrated in the pictures
should be relocated outside of the minimum water supply setback zone so as to
be consistent with the state rules regarding water supply watershed protection.
020240 and 020232 - DOT project (and DOT projects in general. The roads
appear to be wider than is necessary. The DOT should explore the use of their
own TND Road Guidelines to determine if the reduction in street width proposed
in the TND guideline manual could be utilized in these locations. Reducing
] of 2 2/25/02 1:02 PM
401 s for February
rt
impervious surfaces is a
goal of the water supply watershed protection program
and in all the DOT project submitted for review, there appear to be
opportunities for reducing the water quality impacts associated with roads that
are too wide and have more covered surfaces than is necessary.
I have no comments on the other projects.
Thanks for the chance to review the projects.
Sincerely,
Milt Rhodes
2 of 2 2/25/02 1:02 PM
Date: a I a I
To: RRO
?FRO
?WaRO
?WiRO
?WSRO
?ARO
?MRO
Steve Mitchell
Ken Averitte
Deborah Sawyer
Joanne Steenhuis
Jennifer Frye
Mike Parker
Pete Colwell
From: ( ( . -,rA -\
Triage Check List
Project Name V, I k,?q 4I
DWQ Project Number o - Li
County
Telephone (919) 733- C d I
?I
i
A 0W A TF'9 >
r
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
> y Gregory J. Thorpe, Ph.D.
d < Acting Director
Division of Water Quality
January 25, 2002
DWQ # 01-1492
Durham County
CERTIFIED MAIL - RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Manson Company, Inc.
21 Stoneridge Circle
Durham, North Carolina 27705
Dear Sirs:
The Division of Water Quality (DWQ) was notified by receipt of your revised application dated
December 10, 2001 regarding your plan to fill streams for the purpose of developing the Village by the Eno
project in Durham County. Approval from DWQ is required to disturb these streams. Please provide 7 copies
of the following information and refer to the DWQ# listed above in your reply. In particular as described in 15A
NCAC 2B .0502, we will require you to determine whether the stream adjacent to Guess Road that is shown on
the County Soil Survey is subject to the Neuse River buffer rules. Also your plans show stormwater from the
road directly entering the stream. This design must be changed to provide diffuse flow through the buffer.
Finally the total stream impact must be reported. Please show these on maps of suitable scale (for instance
1" = 100 feet) so we can begin to determine your projects' compliance with 15A NCAC 2H.0500.
Please telephone at 919-733-1786 if you have any questions or would require copies of our rules or
procedural materials. This project will remain on hold as incomplete in accordance with 15A NCAC 2H
.0505(c). The processing time for this application will begin when this information is received. If we do not hear
from you by writing within three (3) weeks we will assume you no longer want to pursue the project and will
consider it withdrawn.
rDorney ific tion Program
cc: Raleigh DWQ Regional Office
Raleigh'Corps of Engineers
Central Files
- File Copy
Lynn'tse Hawes
Wetlands/401 Unit 1650 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC 27699-1650 Ph: [phone] Fax: [phone]
AIN?
Customer Service
1 800 623-7748
Date:
To: ?RRO
?FRO
?WaRO
?WiRO
?WSRO
CARO
?MRO
From:
Triage Check List
r QZ _
Steve Mitchell Project Name ??111?1' /'iY ?llZ? L?N2? _
Ken Averitte - - DWQ Project Number ?I=/UQZ
Deborah Sawyer County t
Joanne Steenhuis
Jennifer Frye
Mike Parker
Pole Colwell
3 , ?sLZ62?! Telephone [phone]Z(o
The file attached is being forwarded to you for your evahiafion. Please call if you need
assistance. `
Stream length impacted
Stream determination
? Wetland determination and distance to bhie-fug sup waters on USGW topo maps
Minimization/avoidance issue
Buffer Rules euse, ar-PammHco, Catawbe, F.andlemran)
? Pond fill
? Mitigation Ratios
? Ditching
? Are the stream and or wetland mitigafdon sits ova71ab&-m- and viable?
? Check drawings for accuracy
? Is the application consistent with pre-alppficabon zz gs?
? Cumulative impact concerns
..o
Comments`
? w?.?':'+.2.+9 Y ?_?. .x.' e.._` ? '?' - j _ .:s _il.s -.''..+'?".. - s a.Y'^?'a-.??? `s- `' -12'X ?-Myny
exLOA5
Lam" 1 a
xv, -Ai
•-• - 4_ f+.,,`.-., - .x" '' ?. sue- •Y.°..'tiG'."ra."'}"' - 1 '3 '?'
1` 9c bT
00
Y
r
y'
ARCHITECTURE
ENGINEERING
PLANNING
/ SEAR - BROW N CONSTRUCTION
w
j r
February 5, 2002
FEB i
Mr. John Dorney
NCDENR
Division of Water Quality
Wetlands/401 Unit
1650 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1650
Subject: Eno Forest Neuse Tributary Crossing
DWQ # 01-1492
Dear Mr. Dorney:
1000 Corporate Drive
Hillsborough, NC 27278
919.732.3883 phone
919.732.6676 fax
www.searbrown.com
Sear-Brown recently submitted a package to NCDENR-DWQ for approval and permitting of the proposed
crossing of a Neuse Stream. On January 25, 2002, you responded with a letter, addressing some issues that need
to be resolved prior to approval. A copy of your letter is attached for your reference.
Thank you for your attention to this project. Please consider the following information in response to your letter:
• We will coordinate an onsite meeting with as NCDENR-DWQ employee, so they can make a ruling to
determine if the drainageway along the west side of Guess Road qualifies as a Neuse Stream.
• The current storm drainage plan is preliminary and schematic. We are waiting for the developer to make
some feasibility decisions before we proceed with advanced storm drainage design. Five detention features
are currently proposed. Each one will limit post-developed runoff to pre-developed levels for the 1-year, 24-
hour storm; per Durham's "Neuse Performance Standards". Runoff from each detention feature will be
converted to sheet flow through the use of level spreaders prior to entering the Neuse Stream Buffers.
• Per your instruction, seven sets of the following are attached: Preliminary Storm Drainage Plan, Watershed
Map.
The proposed total stream impact is'as follows:
• Construct a 45-lot residential subdivision within the watershed of a Neuse Stream.
Abide by the City of Durham's "Neuse Performance Standards".
Disturb 192 linear feet of a Neuse Stream for the construction of a proposed road and driveway crossing.
I will contact your Division to coordinate the aforementioned onsite meeting. Please proceed with your
review\approval process.
Sincerely,
SEAR-BROWN

Stephen Ballentine, PE
W ATFR pG
r
r
-c
5
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Gregory J. Thorpe, Ph.D.
Acting Director
Division of Water Quality
January 25, 2002
DWQ # 01-1492
Durham County
CERTIFIED MAIL - RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Manson Company, Inc.
21 Stoneridge Circle
Durham, North Carolina 27705
Dear Sirs:
The Division of Water Quality (DWQ) was notified by receipt of your revised application dated
December 10, 2001 regarding your plan to fill streams for the purpose of developing the Village by the Eno
project in Durham County. Approval from DWQ is required to disturb these streams. Please provide 7 copies
of the following information and refer to the DWQ# listed above in your reply. In particular as described in 15A
NCAC 2B .0502, we will require you to determine whether the stream adjacent to Guess Road that is shown on
the County Soil Survey is subject to the Neuse River buffer rules. Also your plans show stormwater from the
road directly entering the stream. This design must be changed to provide diffuse flow through the buffer.
Finally the total stream impact must be reported. Please show these on maps of suitable scale (for instance
1" = 100 feet) so we can begin to determine your projects' compliance with 15A NCAC 2H .0500.
Please telephone at 919-733-1786 if you have any questions or would require copies of our rules or
procedural materials. This project will remain on hold as incomplete in accordance with 15A NCAC 2H
.0505(c). The processing time for this application will begin when this information is received. If we do not hear
from you by writing within three (3) weeks we will assume you no longer want to pursue the project and will
consider it withdrawn.
S
cc: Raleigh DWQ Regional Office
Raleigh Corps of Engineers
Central Files
File Copy
Lynnise Hawes
?orney
Quality C ific tion Program
Wetlands/401 Unit 1650 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC 27699-1650 Ph: [phone] Fax: [phone]
40
Customer Service
4 Qf%n C7-27'7AQ
?'M t yy
® North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission 9
Charles R. Fullwood, Executive Director
MEMORANDUM
.?
TO: John Dorney, Supervisor DEC g
Wetlands/401.W4ter Quality Certification Unit
Division of Water Q^ u?ality
FROM: Danielle R. Pender, Piedmont Region Coordinator
Habitat Conservation Program
DATE: 13 December 2001
SUBJECT: Pre-construction Notification Application for Village By the Eno (Eno Forest),
Durham County, North Carolina. DWQ ID: 01140
Biologists with the North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission have reviewed the
subject pre-construction notification. An on site investigation was conducted on 29 November
2001 by a NCWRC biologist to further assess impacts to fish and wildlife resources. Our
comments are provided in accordance with provisions of the Clean Water Act of 1977 (as
amended), the Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act (48 Stat. 401, as amended; 16 U.S.C. 661-
667d), and North Carolina General Statutes (G.S. 113-131 et seq.).
The applicant proposes to impact 192 linear feet of stream channel and 23,958 square feet
of riparian buffer with culverts and fill for access roads associated with a 30.34-acre residential
development, Village By the Eno (Eno Forest). The intermittent stream that runs through the
project is an unnamed tributary to the Eno River in the Neuse River Basin. The current condition
of the proposed site is wooded with limited residential use. The adjacent properties consist of
Eno River State Park land. The streambed was dry at the time of inspection, but appeared to
handle relatively high gradient flows during rain events. There are records for the presence of
the federal species of concern and state significantly rare, panhandle pebblesnail (Somatogyrus
virginicus) and the state significantly rare, Roanoke bass (Ambloplites cavifrons) within the Eno
River immediately downstream from these proposed impacts.
There was no mitigation plan or details for avoidance to streams and associated riparian
buffer zones submitted with this application. However, at the time of inspection, the applicant
indicated that site impact number 2 would be eliminated from the proposed plans. This would
reduce the overall proposed impact to 144 linear feet of stream channel. Riparian buffer impacts
would subsequently be reduced with this newly proposed plan. In addition, the applicant stated
that the remaining 50-foot buffer zones within the property would be placed in a conservation
easement with the Eno River State Park. The applicant also stated that scenic easements would
be incorporated throughout the property by leaving existing trees with a diameter at breast height
(DBH) of 16 inches.
Mailing Address: Division of Inland Fisheries • 1721 Mail Service Center • Raleigh, NC 27699-1721
Telephone: [phone] ext. 281 • Fax: [phone]
Page 2
13 December 2001
Village by the Eno
DWQ ID: 011492
Stream piping and placing fill in aquatic resources can result in significant negative
impacts to downstream areas and eliminate fish and wildlife habitat. Stream piping reduces the
infiltration of storm water and associated pollutants, as well as the dissipation of stream energy.
Piping a stream and placing it underground obviously removes both aquatic and terrestrial
habitat. Existing uses by wildlife are lost and future opportunities to improve aquatic diversity,
even if water quality improves, are precluded. The loss of pervious substrate due to residential
development may exacerbate channel degradation due to increased stormwater runoff. However,
we will not object to the project provided that the following recommended conditions are
incorporated into the permit to reduce impacts to fish and wildlife resources.
1. The remaining stream reach within the Village By the Eno Subdivision site; including the
section associated with impact number 2, should be protected from additional impacts by
placing it in a permanent conservation easement to prohibit filling, draining, flooding,
and excavation. Maintaining these areas with forested buffers will minimize impacts to
fish and wildlife resources, water quality, aquatic habitat both within and downstream of
the project area, and help prevent the extirpation of endangered and threatened species.
In addition, wide riparian buffers are helpful in maintaining stability of stream banks and
for treatment of pollutants associated with urban stormwater. Whereas a grassed buffer,
particularly fescue, is a vegetated buffer, it will not provide the necessary and highly
valuable functions offered by forested buffers.
2. If culverts must be used, the culvert should be designed to allow for aquatic life passage.
Generally, this means that the culvert or pipe invert is buried at least one foot below the
natural streambed. If multiple cells are required, the second and/or third cells should be
placed so that their bottoms are at stream bankfull stage (similar to Lyonsfield design).
This will allow sufficient water depth in the culvert or pipe during normal flows to
accommodate fish movements. If culverts are long, and sufficient slope exists, baffle
systems are required to trap gravel and provide resting areas for fish and other aquatic
organisms. If multiple pipes or cells are used, at least one pipe or box should be designed
to remain dry during normal flows to allow for wildlife passage. In addition culverts
should maintain stream dimension, pattern, and profile above and below the culvert.
Riprap should not be placed on the streambed and disturbance of the stream channel must
be limited to only what is necessary to install the pipes. Heavy equipment should be
operated from the bank rather than in the stream channel to minimize sedimentation and
reduce the likelihood of introducing other pollutants into the stream. If concrete will be
used, work must be accomplished so that wet concrete does not contact stream water or
wetland areas.
Stringent erosion control measures should be installed where soil is disturbed and
maintained until project completion. This is especially important in areas adjacent to
streams and wetlands. Temporary or permanent herbaceous vegetation should be planted
on all bare soil within 15 days of ground disturbing activities to provide long-term
erosion control. We encourage the applicant to utilize onsite vegetation and materials for
bank stabilization, to minimize the use of riprap (or hard stabilization methods), and to
maximize the use of native vegetation for stabilization and shade. We request that
matting along with vegetation be used to stabilize the side slopes adjacent to wetlands to
prevent soil erosion into these sensitive areas.
. ? T
Page 3
13 December 2001
Village by the Eno
DWQ ID: 011492
4. Locate sewers and other utilities as far away from creeks as functionally possible and
minimize stream crossings. It is preferable that sewers be located outside the riparian
buffers.
5. A stormwater management plan should be implemented in order to reduce both the short-
term and long-term impacts associated with the construction of roadways in new
neighborhoods. Stormwater runoff can accelerate erosion of stream banks and scouring
of the stream channel. In addition, the pollutants (e.g., sediment, heavy metals,
herbicides, pesticides, and fertilizers) washed from roads and urban landscapes can
adversely affect and extirpate species downstream of developed areas. Grassed swales in
place of curb and gutter and on-site stormwater management (i.e. bioretention areas) can
be installed to produce no net change in the hydrology of the watershed and are
recommended. These designs often cost less to install and significantly reduce
environmental impacts from residential development. Many of these recommendations
have been applied in Maryland in efforts to protect the Chesapeake Bay from water
quality degradation.
Thank you for the opportunity to review this pre-construction notice. If you require
further assistance please contact our office at [phone].,
cc: Todd Tugwell, USACOE, Raleigh
E-mail: Steve Hall, NHP
WT/drp
v `?J - FilFCQoo?.

C

sided ur<n??sc>d j[/Pa;?C?al pc ?aSv Sn, uon: ?o!IUULl gjv .talunuoddo zib3 uv
6SW _L # XVA . 98Li --HL-616 a;'JOgdaPl
IZ9I 699LZ?4J(oraD t{uoy `106i2?-d laluaJ a?cniaS I'K 1Z91 a-;-I tot'/sFc-PaM qa<.-g aar..ux:(j-uo
AE)SWPH !uuap
sullln uaalo0 :00
` pored siy1 6uunp
ppol Ide u66?9si?ajci `asue suo!} nb Aua 11 sans Ja ng Job slenoid pue suo!}eo?trIaa0
LOt' Jo} JoswadnS iiun 6ulio se u4of "IS Pcol 6u4?aubisap 8Je4 wP I ` LOOZ `6z
JagWanON y6noJyl LZ JagW9AON uoourag e 41 Wo>>-uo aou qtr Aw 6uiJna
i!un L0v/spun, M - ics.. d' S 6u y jo uotjeu6lsaa :3U
r t J ^ /?
Joa u4o(':W0ad
!?oazJeZ' qo8
a1-31M Jaa uen aiy?u?0
u40r S PPO1
140u S Auuea
s8ulp!H qoU
asol.uad an>?Q,
JafiaoJN, anaIS .
AssauuaH uyop
uo1? ?JJe-i
aWeS 4ja9 :01
MEN
LOOZ `LZ JagwanoN
s:gz)anos3H -ivan-LvN a 1N3wNOainN3 JOIOOJIQ `sUBAGIS JJa>I
30 _LN3WJ_HVd3Q V OavO HIHON / elaJOaS `UeWIOH II!9
JouJOA09 '-jr 'junH •9 saWer
:)N
e ?4ijpno JGJUM 10 uOISIAIa
saaJnosaa peanjuN pue
[e-mail]] #O juawlile'da4
'eU[IOJ'eo L;,JON 10 al-elS
\0 0? W ATF9oG
? W77-
Michael
F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secfetary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Gregory J. Thorpe, Ph.D.
Acting Director
Division of Water Quality
December 5, 2001
DWQ #01-1492
Durham County
CERTIFIED MAIL-RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED ,
Mason Co., Inc. _
21 Stoneridge Circle f
Durham, NC 27705
Dear Sirs:
On October 12 2001, the DivWon of Waite 0rality (DWQ) was noffed by recent of your application regarding
your plan to fill streams for the purpose of de abping the vfge by the Erb project in Durham County Approval from
DWQ to disturb these streams. Please provide seven copes of the bliowing infoirimlion and refer to the DWQ
number listed above in your reply. in partia;iaas described im 15A NGAC 26.0502, we will require you to locate all
streams on the property. A stream is shown cm the Durham Courrty soli survey, which has not been depicted on the
site plan. This stream wil need tD eitter be dx n on the plan or DWQ slaif will need to determiine if this channel is
subject to the Neuse River buffer males. Please ftw these on a mp of siillable scale (for instance 1' =100 feet) so
we can begin to determine your pmjects compL-mce with 15A NCAC 2F M- 0.
Please call Dave Penrose alt X19) 733-TM A you have any quesnors or would require copiesof our rules or
procedural materials. This prood wN remain zin hold as incomplete is a=dance viih 15 A NCAN 2H .0505 ®.
The processing time for this appfiaion wil begin when ft kftnnafion is nseived. if vie do not tearfrom you within
three (3) weeks of the receipt of Us lle#t?, we mtll asses that you m bnger wit b pursue tt>Es project and wtil
consider it withdrawn.
YOM,

Central Files
File Copy
Lynnise Hawes
Wetlands/401 Unit 1650 Mail SerAce C 0dw. ,.11C 27%8 !1 D P4z §M) 733-7015 Fax [phone]W Custiomer Service
1 800 623.7748
Michael F. Easley
Governor
s William G. Ross,Jr.Secretary
- v Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Kerr T. Stevens
I Division of Water Quality
2MI
DWQ # - (02
? County
?k a/n5r? C .? c
-21 AA Y C1 fc(? ' ` ??
65'L ^
!. 4( [,g
DearbK
On tZi the Divi ' n of Water Quality (DW was notified by receipt of your
application f regarding your plan to fill ds for the purpos of in tv
County. Approval from DWQ is required to disturb these ?JYevm-.r Please provide seven copies
of the following information and refer to the DWQ # listed above in your reply. In particular as described in
15A NCAC 2B .0502, we will require you to locate all streams aids on the property Please show
these on maps of suitable scale (for instance 10 = 100 feet) so we can begin to determin your projects'
compliance with 15A NCAC 2H.0500.
- YA2
Please call me at [phone] if you have any questions or would require c "es of our rules or
procedural materials. This project will remain on hold as incomplete in accordanc with 15A NCAC 2H
.0505(c). The processing time for this application will begin when this information ' received. If we do not
hear from you by writing within three (3) weeks we will assume you no longer w t to pursue the project and
will consider it withdrawn. ?
rS ? `I
Sincerely,
John R. Dorney
Cc: DWQ Regional Office
Corps of Engineers
File Copy
5??'??
C?-
b-A
U-11
Central Files RdO C-0- 11 -
it oz-k /0 6
b?ll `r 'C ENH

Division of Water Quality 1650 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC 27699-1650
Wetlands/401 Unit [phone]
Fa)c [phone]
401 review
Subject: 401 review
Date: Thu, 08 Nov 2001 10:42:07 -0500
From: Megan Owen <[e-mail]>
Organization: NC DENR, DWQ
To: Cyndi Karoly <[e-mail]>, John Dorney <[e-mail]>,
Todd St John <[e-mail]>
Here are my comments:
Projects without issues:
"'Y
011504 (DOT, Ashe county) - not in WS
ram
Projects with issues:
011506 (City of Durham, Durham Co) - no WS issues, but Neuse Rules apply
011584 (Philip Rollins, Catawba Co) - no WS issues, but Catawba Rules
apply
011553 (David Mecimore, Alexander Co) - no WS issues, but Catawba Rules
apply
011538 (C. Breck Patterson, Regions Bank, Macon Co.) - Monger Creek is
WS-III, will need to go to local planning department for bua/buffer
review; will need to minimize bua, divert stormwater and use BMPs as
much as possible.
011521 (DOT, Clay Co.) - Town Creek is WS-IV; will need to revegetate
buffer if it gets impacted; DOT must follows their BMPs guidance
document; must minimize bua and divert stormwater.
011540 (Cassidy Residence, Jackson Co) - WS-III, revegetate buffer if
impacted during construction, keep all non water-dependent structures
out of the buffer.
011511 (Domer Reeves, Beltway Business Park, Mecklenburg Co) - WS-IV and
Catawba Rules apply. County will need to approve bua and buffers.
Development will need to stay out of the buffers.
V1 011492 (Village By the Eno, Durham Co.) - within WS-IV-PA. Durham
Planning Dept. will need to review bua, stormwater, buffers. If streams
truly intermittent WSWP buffers do not apply. Neuse buffer do apply.
011524 (DOT, Macon Co) - Cloer Creek is WS-III Tr. DOT must follow
their BMPs guidance document, minimize bua, and divert stormwater away
from surface waters. Revegetate buffer when construction is done.
Megan Owen <meg?[e-mail]>
Environmental Planner
North Carolina Department of Environment & Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
1 of 2 11/8/0111:42 AN.
MEMORANDUM
TO: John Dorney Regional Contact:
Non-Discharge Branch WO Supervisor:
Date:
SUBJECT: WETLAND STAFF REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS
Facility Name Village By The Eno c/o The Manson Company
Project Number 01 1492
Recvd From APP
Received Date 10/12/01 Recvd By Region
Project Type residential /'commercial
County DURHAM
County2
Region Raleigh
Certificates Stream Stream Impacts (ft.)
Permit Wetland Wetland Wetland Stream Class Acres Feet
Type Type Impact Score Index Prim. Supp. Basin Req. Req. ME
F39 Stream O1 ON 127-2 WSII HQWCA 30,401. F- F t92.00 r-?
NBR F O TO N r--?r-r 30,401.
Mitigation Wetland
MitigationType Type Acres Feet
Is Wetland Rating Sheet Attached? O Y ON Did you request more info? O Y ON
Have Project Changes/Conditions Been Discussed With Applicant? O Y O N
Is Mitigation required? O Y O N
Recommendation: O Issue O Issue/Cond O Deny
Provided by Region: Latitude (ddmmss) Longitude (ddmmss)
Comments:
Ther a is a feature depicted on the Soils ma a ,'acent to Guess Road that is not represented on
the construction drawing. Also, road crossing does not show the entire length of impact. Second
feature should be looked and a more specific diagram of the road crossing should be provided.
cc: Regional Office
Central Office Page Number 1
Facility Name Village By The Eno c/o The Manson Company County DURHAM
Project Number 01 1492 Regional Contact:
Date:
Comments (continued from page 1):
cc: Regional Office
Central Office Page Number 2
Triage Check List
Date:
To: RRO Steve Mitchell Project Name

?FRO
Ken Averitte
DWO Pro
, mber
1 --r z
OWaRO Deborah Sawyer 71
E
CountyOt - --
E WiRO Joanne Steenhuis
EIWSRO Jennifer Frye
DARO Mike Parker
?M P ?e Ewell

From: Telephone 919 .733-

The file atta is t Being forwarbed to you for your evaluation. Please call if you need
assistance.
? Stream length impacted
? Stream dete.,,nation
? Wetland deter,. ' -lien a-? .once to blue-line surface waters on USGW topo maps
MinimizaticrJa roidance i-oes
KBuer Ruler
e, i ar1s;,1co, Catawba,'Randleman)
? Pond fill
? Mitigation Ra bcs
? Ntcr?ing
? Are the strew ar)d cr we?? midga-gin sites avalable and viable?
? Che--t dr-eN r r,- for acer of
? is the appfc? corris: i-arkh pr=-a piication meetings?
? Cumulative k pact cNic

CALLEMYN • PARKER
A A division of SEAR BROWN .i
@, _JUI
1000 CORPORATE DRIVE, SUITE 101
HILLSBOROUGH, NORTH CAROLINA 27278
,
[phone] Fax: [phone]
TO >> V IS1ON bf= WA,-MZ, QVA l 1:W
,4DI I VJ1ETLaNj>5 OW T
(O 5b M A t 1. Se"ic e (_G nl-ree
QALaicN NC "Ologq- r?? v
Letter Of Transmitt
DATE ((? 3 Q r PROD. NO. (?d
RE J t ArtsE U +h15 GOO I
ATTN ()11492
WE ARE SENDING YOU E3' Attached ? Under Separate Cover ? Transmitted Via
? Prints ? Reproducibles ? Specifications ? Shop Drawings
? Copy of Letter ? Change Order ?
COPIES DRAWING DATE DESCRIPTION
7 W13101 '? 'P2mI
7 Cam-ZD8- o 3 . lot 1jM1Al ?11+r
f

TRANSMITTED ?r
For Approval ? As Requested ? For Your Lg'se ? For Review and Comment
COMMENTS
Pq YMT
VLU
COPY TO
with (?) Enc.
with (?) Enc. SIGNED( i?
#SB-01-HI (03/01)
- W A TF
O 9 Michael F. Easley
?O? pG Governor
Oj 7 William G. Ross, Jr., Secretary
Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Gregory J. Thorpe, Ph.D., Acting Director
Division of Water Quality
April 1, 2002
Durham County
DWQ Project No. 01-1492
CERTIFIED MAIL: RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
William D. Cardin
The Manson Company, Inc.
21 Stoneridge Circle
Durham, NC, 27705
Dear Mr. Cardin:
On February 11, 2002, the NC Division of Water Quality received your additional application materials for your proposal to impact
192 linear feet of streams, and 23,958 square feet of Neuse Buffers in order to construct the proposed Village By the Eno Subdivision in .
Durham County. You have requested a 401 Water Quality Certification and approval under the Neuse Buffer Rules. In accordance with
15A NCAC 2H..0506, a thorough inspection of the site has been conducted by Mr. Steve Mitchell of the DWQ Raleigh Regional Office
and by Mr. Dave Penrose and Ms. Cyndi Karoly of the DWQ Central Office in Raleigh. Based on this review, we have determined that
significant uses would be removed or degraded by this project. It is still unclear from the site visit or from your application where precisely
all the proposed stream and buffer impacts would be located. Therefore, we have determined that insufficient information has been
provided in order for us to complete our review. Specifically, please provide the following information so that we can complete our review
of your application:
Does the 192-linear foot calculation include all inlet and outlet stream stabilization measures? If not, these structures (such as rip-
rap) must be included in your calculations;
We understand that you are delaying design of your stormwater management plan pending feasibility studies on the site. We must
reiterate that you are required to provide site-specific stomrvater details, specifically with respect to the Neuse Buffers, in order for us
to complete our review;
In your application, you stated that the stream you propose to impact is intermittent. Based upon a field review conducted by my staff
on March 28, 2002, we have determined that the stream in question is clearly perennial. As such, cumulative impacts of 150 linear
feet or more will require mitigation. A copy of our biological reconnaissance form is attached for your information.
Since the stream impacts associated with this project exceed 150 Linear feet, compensatory stream mitigation will be required for
this project in accordance with 15A NCAC 2H .0506(h). You have the following options for satisfying the stream mitigation requirement
associated with this project:
1. Payment into the North Carolina Wetland Restoration Prograrn (W RP), if the W RP will accept the responsibility for conducting this
mitigation work, or
2. Preparing and implementing a stream mitigation plan.
Please note that your application will be considered inconviete until a detailed mitigation plan including a 1:1 stream restoration
component is forwarded to this office. We strongly suggest that you locate a mitigation site within the same river sub-basin as your
project. At this time we are unable to conclusively determine the stream (and possibly buffer) mitigation requirements due to the lack of
clarity in the application with respect to stream stabilization measures and buffer impact locations. We strongly suggest that you schedule
a meeting with staff of the DWQ Central Office (Cyndi Karoly and Bob Zarzecki) and Steve Mitchell of the Raleigh Regional Office so that
we may clarify the scope of impacts associated with this project, and make a determination as to mitigation requirements.
If you decide to propose use of the Wetland Restoration Program in CLeu of developing your own stream mitigation
plan, you will need to notify this office in writing in your response, and we mll contact the W RP on your behalf to see if they will accept
the project. You should note that mitigation requirements proposed to be mitigated through the Wetland Restoration Program must be
rounded to the nearest linear foot increment according to 15 2r .0503(b).
By copy of this letter, I am notifying the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers that this project should be placed on hold. Thank you for your
attention. If you have any questions, please contact Steve Mdcheil in our Raleigh Regional Office at [phone] or Cyndi Karoly in
Raleigh at [phone].
North Carolina Division of Water Quality, 401 Wetfarxis Certification Unit,
1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1650 (MaTing Address)
2321 Crabtree Blvd., Raleigh, NC 27604-2260 (Location)
919-733-1786 (phone), 919-733-6893 (fax), httpl/t2o.vrustate_r.c.us/ncwetlands/
t+- . ',-
Page 2 of 2
cc: Corps of Engineers Raleigh Regulatory Field Office
Raleigh DWQ Regional Office
File Copy
Central Files
Bob Zarzecki
Lynnise M. Hawes/Stephen Ballentine, 1000 Corporate Drive, Suite 101, Hillsborough, NC, 27278
011492
R• , -s
Biological Reconnaissance Form #
BIOLOGICAL RECONNAISANCE FORM
PerenniaVIntermittent Point
Send to Dave Penrose
401AVetlands Unit, Division of Water Quality
1650 Mail Services Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1621
e-mail Di•[e-mail], FAX [phone]
a) Location Eno Forest Subdivision
Stream Name: UT Eno river Receiving Waterbody: Eno river
Location/Road: Guess Rd County: Durham Date: 28 March 2002 Regional Office: RRO
Basin: Neuse I Subbasin: 030401 Latitude/Longitude:
Ecoregion: Slate Belt Rosgen Class: Observers: DP/CK USGS Quad Sheet: Northwest
Durham
Notes (attach photograph or drawing on the back of this form): the UT is located directed behind the road to the power
station. Collection site was near the manhole at the bend in the road.
b) Habitat
Primary Adjacent Land Use: Forest Riparian Zone Characteristics: Hardwood
(Maple/Beech/Sycamore)
Stream Width: > one i Flow Conditions: high, clear I Stream Order: first
meter i
Stream Permanence Characteristics. Rating (if relevant): Good riffle/pool sequence, Good bed and bank characteristics.
angled rocks typical of the slate belt ecoregion. Much of the substrate had macrophytes growing on it (Podostomum?),
with some algae. Fairly deep pools.
c) Biology
Benthic Macroinvertebrate Taxa: Mayfly - Ameletus, Caddisfly - Dolophilodes
Amphipoda: X Isopoda: ? Decapoda: X Chironomidae: X OIigochaeta: ? Mollusca: ?
Ephemeroptera: X Poeoptera: ? Trichoptera: X Coleoptera: ? Other Diptera: ?
Fish and Salamander Taxa: Salamanders were present.
Other Observations (i.e. Presence of Iron Oxidizing Bacteria): Strongly perennial system typical of the slate belt
ecoregion. Flow maybe reduced or eliminated during very low flow periods of late summer, early fall. However there
is a good likelihood that the ground water and hyporheic zones are good.
RE: Village by the Eno
Subject: RE: Village by the Eno
Date: Tue, 14 May 2002 16:40:42 -0400
From: "Ballentine, Stephen" <[e-mail]>
To: "Cyndi Karoly" <[e-mail]>
Cyndi,
Water Supply Watersheds should not be a topic of concern. I have inquired to DWQ nume
As I mentioned to you on the phone, the City of Durham has Water Supply Watershed regu
The City of Durham has Water Supply Watershed regulations and Neuse Performance Standa
The City of Durham's Neuse Performance Standard requires that projects exceeding 15% it
Nationwide Permit 39, section 3 states that projects exceeding 30% impervious coverage
As you advised, I will speak with Todd further on this.
Stephen
-----Original Message-----
From: Cyndi Karoly [mailto: cyndi. karoly@ncmail. net I
Sent: Monday, May 13, 2002 2:54 PM
To: Ballentine, Stephen
Subject: Village by the Eno
I tried the searbrown phone lines, but couldn't get a response through
the operator, so I'm e-mailing.
I discussed your project with Bob zarzecki, who issued your 401/Buffer
approval for this project. We do absolutely have the option to add
stormwater conditions at our discretion. Bob had reviewed this project
with Todd (our stormwater engineer) and Todd had wanted the 85% TSS
condition included due to the water supply involvement and other
specific details on your site. Todd is out this week, but I am going to
call him at home tonight and ask him to contact you. In my opinion, it
would be best for you to sit down with Todd and go over the details of
your stormwater management-plan. I'll ask Todd to call you if he gets a
break this week to schedule a meeting as soon as the two of you can get
together. Also, from talking to Bob, it's clear that diffuse flow
design was a big concern for them with respect to this project, as there
were substantial buffer impacts. Bob will be in this afternoon (May
13), and he says you're welcome to call him at 733-9726. He'll be out
Tuesday, but you might also be able to sit down with him later this week
as well if you'd like. We still have to get Todd's final word, but you
may be interested in talking with Bob as well since he's our buffer
expert.
The best format for you to process your revisions is thus - once you and
Todd agree to the best plan form for you to submit, send us one revision
request, clearly including our DWQ#011492 and referencing your May 1
401. Include a drawing showing your final, worst-case scenario for
stream impact, which must be below 150 to avoid mitigation, and provide
whatever stormwater details which you agree to with Todd. You can
direct your revision package to my attention.
I of 1 5/15/02 9:26 AM
? bC
?? V,A ?
o.OF W A 7- 9Q
o ?
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Gregory J. Thorpe, Ph.D.
Acting Director
Division of Water Quality
June 24, 2002
Macon County
DWQ Project #: 01-1538
Project Name:
Regions Bank
APPROVAL OF 401 QUALITY CERTIFICATION WITH
ADDITIONAL CONDITIONS
C. Breck Patterson
Regions Bank
P.O. Box 2379
Highlands, NC 28741
Dear Mr. Patterson:
You have our approval, in accordance with the attached conditions and those listed below, to
culvert 146 linear feet, realign 68 feet and enhance 225 feet (135 feet on the main channel and 90
feet on the tributary channel) of streams for construction of the Regions Bank facility located at Spring
Street and NC 106 in the Town of Highlands, as you described in your revised application dated
March 13, 2002 (received March 22, 2002) with a final revision dated April 4, 2002 (received April 8,
2002). After reviewing your application, we have decided that this fill is covered by General Water
Quality Certification Number 3362. This certification allows you to use Nationwide Permit Number 39
when the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers issues it. This approval also is for the Water Supply
Watershed Protection Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0215).
In addition, you should get any other federal, state or local permits before you go ahead with
your project including (but not limited to) Sediment and Erosion Control, Coastal Stormwater, and
Non-Discharge regulations. This approval will expire when the accompanying 404 Permit
expires unless otherwise specified in the General Water Quality Certification.
This approval is only valid for the purpose and design that you described in your application
except as modified below. This approval shall expire when the corresponding Nationwide Permit
expires or as otherwise provided in the General Certification. For this approval to be valid, you must
follow the conditions listed in the attached certification and any special or site-specific conditions
listed below.
SPECIAL CONDITIONS:
1. Deed notifications or similar mechanisms such as a conservation easement shall be placed on
all remaining jurisdictional wetlands and waters to notify the state in order to assure compliance
for future wetland and/or water impact. These mechanisms shall be put in place within 30 days
of the date of this letter or the issuance of the 404 Permit (whichever is later).
2. Upon completion of the project, the applicant shall complete and return the enclosed "Certificate
of Completion Form" to notify DWQ that all the work included in the 401 Certification has been
completed. The. responsible party shall complete the attached form and return it to the
401 /Wetlands Unit of the Division of Water Quality.
VXX
NCDENR
N. C. Division of Water Quality, 401 Wetlands Certification Unit,
1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1650 (Mailing Address)
2321 Crabtree Blvd., Raleigh, NC 27604-2260 (Location)
[phone] (phone), 919-733-6893 (fax), (http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetiands

3. If you change your project, you must notify us in writing and you may be required to send us a
new application.
4. If the property is sold, the new owner must be given a copy of this Certification and approval
letter and is thereby responsible for complying with all conditions.
5. If total wetland fills for this project (now or in the future) exceed one acre or permanent stream
impacts exceed 150 linear feet, then compensatory mitigation may be required as described in
15A NCAC 2H .0506 (h) (6) and (7).
SITE-SPECIFIC CONDITIONS:
An additional condition is that a final written stormwater management plan shall be approved in
writing by the Wetland/401 Unit of DWQ before the impacts specified in this Certification occur.
A final copy of the plans for the bioretention cells must be sent to DWQ for written approval.
The stormwater management plan must include plans and specifications for stormwater
management facilities designed to remove 85% TSS according to the most recent version of the
NC DENR Stormwater Best Management Practices Manual. These facilities must be designed
to treat the runoff from the entire project, unless otherwise explicitly approved by the Division of
Water Quality. Also, before any permanent building is occupied at the subject site, the facilities
(as approved by the Wetland/401 Unit of DWQ) shall be constructed and operational, and the
stormwater management plan (as approved by the Wetland/401 Unit of DWQ) shall be
implemented. The structural stormwater practices as approved by the Wetland/401 Unit of DWQ
as well as drainage patterns must be maintained in perpetuity. No changes to the structural
stormwater practices shall be made without written authorization from the Division of Water
Quality.
2. Stream realignment and stream bank enhancement must follow the plans submitted on March
13, 2002 (received on March 22, 2002) and updated on April 4, 2002 (received on April 8, 2002)
submitted by your consultant Mr. Mickey Henson of Appalachian Environmental Services unless
otherwise approved in writing by DWQ.
If you do not accept any of the conditions of this certification, you may ask for an adjudicatory
hearing. You must act within 60 days of the date that you receive this letter. To ask for a hearing,
send a written petition, which conforms to Chapter 150B of the North Carolina General Statutes to the
Office of Administrative Hearings, P.O. Box 27447, Raleigh, N.C. 27611-7447. This certification and
its conditions are final and binding unless you ask for a hearing.
This letter completes the review of the Division of Water Quality under Section 401 of the Clean
Water Act. If you have any questions, please telephone John Dorney at 919-733-1786 or Mike Parker
at our Asheville Regional Office at 828-251-6208.
Sincerely,
Attachments:
General Water Quality Certification
Certificate of Completion
Klimek,
cc: Dave Baker, US Army Corps of Engineers Asheville Field Office
Mike Parker, Asheville DWQ Regional Office
File copy
Central Files
Todd St. John
Philip Ward, Philip Ward L.A.
Mickey Henson, Appalachian Environmental Services
Eric Braun; Womble, Carlyle, Sandridge and Rice

Office Use Only: Form Version April 2001
USACE Action ID No. DWQ No.
If any particular item is not applicable to this project, please enter "Not Applicable" or "N/A" rather than
leaving the space blank.
L Processing -?
s ? ? e
1. Check all of the approval(s) requested for this project: i
? Section 404 Permit `p f 2002
? Section 10 Permit J1
® 401 Water Quality Certification ?i VULAAf_ ($0up
® Riparian or Watershed Buffer Rules U`"t S«iftf
2. Nationwide, Regional or General Permit Number(s) Requested: 39
3. If this notification is solely a courtesy copy because written approval for the 401 Certification
is not required, check here: ?
4. If payment into the North Carolina Wetlands Restoration Program (NCWRP) is proposed for
mitigation of impacts (see section VIII - Mitigation), check here: ?
II. Applicant Information
1. Owner/Applicant Information
Name: The Manson Company, Inc.
Mailing Address: 21 Stoneridge Circle, Durham, NC 27705
Telephone Number: [phone] Fax Number:
E-mail Address:
2. Agent Information (A signed and dated copy of the Agent Authorization letter must be
attached if the Agent has signatory authority for the owner/applicant.)
Name:
Company Affiliation:
Mailing Address:
Telephone Number:
E-mail Address:
Fax Number:
Page 3 of 12
III. Project Information
Attach a vicinity map clearly showing the location of the property with respect to local
landmarks such as towns, rivers, and roads. Also provide a detailed site plan showing property
boundaries and development plans in relation to surrounding properties. Both the vicinity map
and site plan must include a scale and north arrow. The specific footprints of all buildings,
impervious surfaces, or other facilities must be included. If possible, the maps and plans should
include the appropriate USGS Topographic Quad Map and NRCS Soil Survey with the property
boundaries outlined. Plan drawings, or other maps may be included at the applicant's discretion,
so long as the property is clearly defined. For administrative and distribution purposes, the
USACE requires information to be submitted on sheets no larger than 11 by 17-inch format;
however, DWQ may accept paperwork of any size. DWQ prefers full-size construction
drawings rather than a sequential sheet version of the full-size plans. If full-size plans are
reduced to a small scale such that the final version is illegible, the applicant will be informed that
the project has been placed on hold until decipherable maps are provided.
1. Name of project: Eno Forest (formerly Village by the Eno)
2. T.I.P. Project Number (NCDOT Only):
3. Property Identification Number (Tax PIN): 0814-04-84-7223 & 0814-04-84-8730
4. Location

County: Durham Nearest Town: Durham
Subdivision name (include phase/lot number): Eno Forest
Directions to site (include road numbers, landmarks, etc.):
4213 Guess Road (SR 1003) Durham NC 27712
5. Site coordinates, if available (UTM or Lat/Long): NA
(Note - If project is linear, such as a road or utility line, attach a sheet that separately lists the
coordinates for each crossing of a distinct waterbody.)
6. Describe the existing land use or condition of the site at the time of this application:
Wooded with residential use
7. Property size (acres):
8. Nearest body of water (stream/river/sound/ocean/lake): Eno River
9. River Basin: Neuse River
(Note - this must be one of North Carolina's seventeen designated major river basins. The
River Basin map is available at http•//h2o.enr.state.nc.us/admin/maps/.)
Page 4 of 12
10. Describe the purpose of the proposed work: Road construction.
11. List the type of equipment to be used to construct the project:
Grading and paving equipment.
12. Describe the land use in the vicinity of this project: Residential uses and a state park.
IV. Prior Project History
If jurisdictional determinations and/or permits have been requested and/or obtained for this
project (including all prior phases of the same subdivision) in the past, please explain. Include
the USACE Action ID Number, DWQ Project Number, application date, and date permits and
certifications were issued or withdrawn. Provide photocopies of previously issued permits,
certifications or other useful information. Describe previously approved wetland, stream and
buffer impacts, along with associated mitigation (where applicable). If this is a NCDOT project,
list and describe permits issued for prior segments of the same T.I.P. project, along with
construction schedules.
Important stream evaluation was performed 8/7/01. See attachment.
USACE ACTION ID: 2001121300
V. Future Project Plans
Are any additional permit requests anticipated for this project in the future? If so, describe the
anticipated work, and provide justification for the exclusion of this work from the current
application: No.
VI. Proposed Impacts to Waters of the United States/Waters of the State
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
wetlands, open water, and stream channels associated with the project. The applicant must also
provide justification for these impacts in Section VII below. All proposed impacts, permanent
and temporary, must be listed herein, and must be clearly identifiable on an accompanying site
plan. All wetlands and waters, and all streams (intermittent and perennial) must be shown on a
delineation map, whether or not impacts are proposed to these systems. Wetland and stream
evaluation and delineation forms should be included as appropriate. Photographs may be
included at the applicant's discretion. If this proposed impact is strictly for wetland or stream
mitigation, list and describe the impact in Section VIII below. If additional space is needed for
listing or description, please attach a separate sheet.
Page 5 of 12
1. Wetland Impacts
Wetland Impact
Site Number
(indicate on map)
Type of Impact* Area of
Impact
(acres) Located within
100-year Floodplain**
(yes/no) Distance to
Nearest Stream
(linear feet)
Type of Wetland***

* List each impact separately and identify temporary impacts. Impacts include, but are not limited to: mechanized clearing, grading, fill,
excavation, flooding, ditching/drainage, etc. For dams, separately list impacts due to both structure and flooding.
** 100-Year floodplains are identified through the Federal Emergency Management Agency's (FEMA) Flood Insurance Rate Maps
(FIRM), or FEMA-approved local floodplain maps. Maps are available through the FEMA Map Service Center at 1-800-358-9616, or
online at htip://www.fema.gov.
*** List a wetland type that best describes wetland to be impacted (e.g., freshwater/saltwater marsh, forested wetland, beaver pond,
Carolina Bay, bog, etc.)
List the total acreage (estimated) of existing wetlands on the property: NA.
Total area of wetland impact proposed:
2. Stream Impacts, including all intermittent and perennial streams
Stream Impact
Site Number
(indicate on map)
Type of Impact* Length of
Impact
(linear feet)
Stream Name** Average Width
of Stream
Before Impact Perennial or
Intermittent?
(please specify)
1 Culvert 150 UT - Eno River 6' Perennial

* List each impact separately and identify temporary impacts. Impacts include, but are not limited to: culverts and associated rip-rap,
dams (separately list impacts due to both structure and flooding), relocation (include linear feet before and after, and net loss/gain),
stabilization activities (cement wall, rip-rap, crib wall, gabions, etc.), excavation, ditching/straightening, etc. If stream relocation is
proposed, plans and profiles showing the linear footprint for both the original and relocated streams must be included.
** Stream names can be found on USGS topographic maps. If a stream has no name, list as UT (unnamed tributary) to the nearest
downstream named stream into which it flows. USGS maps are available through the USGS at 1-800-358-9616, or online at
www.usgs.gov. Several internet sites also allow direct download and printing of USGS maps (e.g., www.tol)ozone.com,
www.mapquest.com, etc.).
Cumulative impacts (linear distance in feet) to all streams on site: 150
Page 6 of 12
3. Open Water Impacts, including Lakes, Ponds, Estuaries, Sounds, Atlantic Ocean and any
other Water of the U.S.
Open Water Impact
Site Number
(indicate on map)
Type of Impact* Area of
Impact
(acres) Name of Waterbody

(if applicable) Type of Waterbody
(lake, pond, estuary, sound,
bay, ocean, etc.)

* List each impact separately and identify temporary impacts. Impacts include, but are not limited to: fill, excavation, dredging,
flooding, drainage, bulkheads, etc.
4. Pond Creation
If construction of a pond is proposed, associated wetland and stream impacts should be
included above in the wetland and stream impact sections. Also, the proposed pond should
be described here and illustrated on any maps included with this application.
Pond to be created in (check all that apply): ® uplands ? stream ? wetlands
Describe the method of construction (e.g., dam/embankment, excavation, installation of
draw-down valve or spillway, etc.): Dam/embankment, excavation, and installation of
spillways
Proposed use or purpose of pond (e.g., livestock watering, irrigation, aesthetic, trout pond,
local stormwater requirement, etc.): Local stormwater requirement.
Size of watershed draining to pond: (1)0.7 ac.; Q7.1 ac.; (3)3.8 ac.; (4)8.6 ac.; (5)-25.5 ac.
Expected pond surface area: (1)962 sf; Q2,201 sf; (3)4,244 sf, (4)5,578 sf, (5)5,967 sf
VII. Impact Justification (Avoidance and Minimization)
Specifically describe measures taken to avoid the proposed impacts. It may be useful to provide
information related to site constraints such as topography, building ordinances, accessibility, and
financial viability of the project. The applicant may attach drawings of alternative, lower-impact
site layouts, and explain why these design options were not feasible. Also discuss how impacts
were minimized once the desired site plan was developed. If applicable, discuss construction
techniques to be followed during construction to reduce impacts.
Crossing the stream is the only way to access that portion of the property.
Page 7 of 12
VIII. Mitigation
DWQ - In accordance with 15A NCAC 2H .0500, mitigation may be required by the NC
Division of Water Quality for projects involving greater than or equal to one acre of impacts to
freshwater wetlands or greater than or equal to 150 linear feet of total impacts to perennial
streams.
USACE - In accordance with the Final Notice of Issuance and Modification of Nationwide
Permits, published in the Federal Register on March 9, 2000, mitigation will be required when
necessary to ensure that adverse effects to the aquatic environment are minimal. Factors
including size and type of proposed impact and function and relative value of the impacted
aquatic resource will be considered in determining acceptability of appropriate and practicable
mitigation as proposed. Examples of mitigation that may be appropriate and practicable include,
but are not limited to: reducing the size of the project; establishing and maintaining wetland
and/or upland vegetated buffers to protect open waters such as streams; and replacing losses of
aquatic resource functions and values by creating, restoring, enhancing, or preserving similar
functions and values, preferable in the same watershed.
If mitigation is required for this project, a copy of the mitigation plan must be attached in order
for USACE or DWQ to consider the application complete for processing. Any application
lacking a required mitigation plan or NCWRP concurrence shall be placed on hold as
incomplete. An applicant may also choose to review the current guidelines for stream restoration
in DWQ's Draft Technical Guide for Stream Work in North Carolina, available at
htlp://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands/strmgide.html.
1. Provide a brief description of the proposed mitigation plan. The description should provide
as much information as possible, including, but not limited to: site location (attach directions
and/or map, if offsite), affected stream and river basin, type and amount (acreage/linear feet)
of mitigation proposed (restoration, enhancement, creation, or preservation), a plan view,
preservation mechanism (e.g., deed restrictions, conservation easement, etc.), and a
description of the current site conditions and proposed method of construction. Please attach
a separate sheet if more space is needed.
NA.
Page 8 of 12
2. Mitigation may also be made by payment into the North Carolina Wetlands Restoration
Program (NCWRP) with the NCWRP's written agreement. Check the box indicating that
you would like to pay into the NCWRP. Please note that payment into the NCWRP must be
reviewed and approved before it can be used to satisfy mitigation requirements. Applicants
will be notified early in the review process by the 401/Wetlands Unit if payment into the
NCWRP is available as an option. For additional information regarding the application
process for the NCWRP, check the NCWRP website at htrp://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/wrp/index.htm. If
use of the NCWRP is proposed, please check the appropriate box on page three and provide
the following information:
Amount of stream mitigation requested (linear feet): NA.
Amount of buffer mitigation requested (square feet): NA.
Amount of Riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres): NA.
Amount of Non-riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres): NA.
Amount of Coastal wetland mitigation requested (acres): NA.
IX. Environmental Documentation (DWQ Only)
Does the project involve an expenditure of public funds or the use of public (federal/state/local)
land?
Yes ? No
If yes, does the project require preparation of an environmental document pursuant to the
requirements of the National or North Carolina Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
Note: If you are not sure whether a NEPA/SEPA document is required, call the SEPA
coordinator at [phone] to review current thresholds for environmental documentation.
Yes ? No ?
If yes, has the document review been finalized by the State Clearinghouse? If so, please attach a
copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval letter.
Yes ? No ?
X. Proposed Impacts on Riparian and Watershed Buffers (DWQ Only)
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
required state and local buffers associated with the project. The applicant must also provide
justification for these impacts in Section VII above. All proposed impacts must be listed herein,
and must be clearly identifiable on the accompanying site plan. All buffers must be shown on a
map, whether or not impacts are proposed to the buffers. Correspondence from the DWQ
Regional Office may be included as appropriate. Photographs may also be included at the
applicant's discretion.
Will the project impact protected riparian buffers identified within 15A NCAC 2B .0233
(Meuse), 15A NCAC 2B .0259 (Tar-Pamlico), 15A NCAC 2B .0250 (Randleman Rules and
Water Supply Buffer Requirements), or other (please identify )?
Page 9 of 12
Yes ® No ? If you answered "yes", provide the following information:
Identify the square feet and acreage of impact to each zone of the riparian buffers. If buffer
mitigation is required calculate the required amount of mitigation by applying the buffer
multipliers.
Zone* Impact
(square feet) Multiplier Required
Mitigation
1 8,450 3
2 5,286 1.5
Total 13,736
* Zone 1 extends out 3U teet perpendicular trom near banK of cnannel; zone 2 extends an
additional 20 feet from the edge of Zone 1.
If buffer mitigation is required, please discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (i.e., Donation
of Property, Conservation Easement, Riparian Buffer Restoration / Enhancement, Preservation or
Payment into the Riparian Buffer Restoration Fund). Please attach all appropriate information as
identified within 15A NCAC 2B .0242 or .0260.
XI. Stormwater (DWQ Only)
Describe impervious acreage (both existing and proposed) versus total acreage on the site.
Discuss stormwater controls proposed in order to protect surface waters and wetlands
downstream from the property.
The existing impervious surface is 2.59%. The proposed maximum impervious surface is 24%.
Rip-rap will be used at all outlets. Level spreaders will be used at all detention ponds.
XII. Sewage Disposal (DWQ Only)
Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of
wastewater generated from the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
The wastewater generated by the proposed project will be pumped away from the site.
XIII. Violations (DWQ Only)
Is this site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H.0500) or any Buffer Rules?
Yes ? No
Is this an after-the-fact permit application?
Page 10 of 12
Yes ? No
XIV. Other Circumstances (Optional):
It is the applicant's responsibility to submit the application sufficiently in advance of desired
construction dates to allow processing time for these permits. However, an applicant may
choose to list constraints associated with construction or sequencing that may impose limits on
work schedules (e.g., draw-down schedules for lakes, dates associated with Endangered and
Threatened Species, accessibility problems, or other issues outside of the applicant's control).
NA.
TfbE /nR?So? 0-0/h A9A)1, INN-
Applicant/Agent's Signature Date
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant is provided.)
US Army Corps Of Engineers Field Offices and County Coverage
Asheville Regulatory Field Office Alexander Cherokee Iredell Mitchell
US Army Corps of Engineers Avery Clay Jackson Polk
151 Patton Avenue Buncombe Cleveland Lincoln Rowan
Room 208 Burke Gaston Macon Rutherford
Asheville, NC 28801-5006 Cabamis Graham Madison Stanley
Telephone: [phone] Caldwell Haywood McDowell Swain
Fax: [phone] Catawba Henderson Mecklenburg Transylvania
Raleigh Regulatory Field Office Alamance Durham Johnston Rockingham
US Army Corps Of Engineers Alleghany Edgecombe Lee Stokes
6508 Falls of the Neuse Road Ashe Franklin Nash Sur y
Suite 120 Caswell Forsyth Northampton Vance
Raleigh, NC 27615 Chatham Granville Orange Wake
Telephone: [phone] Davidson Guilford Person Warren
Fax: [phone] Davie Halifax Randolph Wilkes
Washington Regulatory Field Office Beaufort Currituck Jones
US Army Corps Of Engineers Bertie Dare Lenoir
Post Office Box 1000 Camden Gates Martin
Washington, NC 27889-1000 Carteret* Green Pamlico
Telephone: [phone] Chowan Hertford Pasquotank
Fax: [phone] Craven Hyde Perquimans
Wilmington Regulatory Field Office
US Army Corps Of Engineers
Post Office Box 1890
Wilmington, NC 28402-1890
Anson Duplin Onslow
Bladen Harnett Pender
Brunswick Hoke, Richmond
Carteret Montgomery Robeson
Pitt
Tyrrell
Washington
Wayne
CTb
Union
Watauga
Yancey
Wilson
Yadkin
*Croatan National Forest Only
Page 11 of 12
r ?
S
Office Use Only: Form Version April 2001
USACE Action ID No. DWQ No.
If any particular item is not applicable to this project, please enter "Not Applicable" or "N/A" rather than
leaving the space blank.
1.
II.
Processing
1. Check all of the approval(s) requested for this project
? Section 404 Permit
? Section 10 Permit
® 401 Water Quality Certification
® Riparian or Watershed Buffer Rules
2. Nationwide, Regional or General Permit Number(s) Requested: 3

3. If this notification is solely a courtesy copy because written approval for the 401 Certification
is not required, check here: ?
4. If payment into the North Carolina Wetlands Restoration Program (NCWRP) is proposed for
mitigation of impacts (see section VIII - Mitigation), check here: ?
Applicant Information
1. Owner/Applicant Information
Name: The Manson Company, Inc.
Mailing Address: 21 Stoneridge Circle, Durham, NC 27705
Telephone Number: [phone]
E-mail Address:
Fax Number:
2. Agent Information (A signed and dated copy of the Agent Authorization letter must be
attached if the Agent has signatory authority for the owner/applicant.)
Name:
Company Affiliation:
Mailing Address:
Telephone Number:
E-mail Address:
Fax Number:
APR inn
Page 3 of 12
III. Project Information
Attach a vicinity map clearly showing the location of the property with respect to local
landmarks such as towns, rivers, and roads. Also provide a detailed site plan showing property
boundaries and development plans in relation to surrounding properties. Both the vicinity map
and site plan must include a scale and north arrow. The specific footprints of all buildings,
impervious surfaces, or other facilities must be included. If possible, the maps and plans should
include the appropriate USGS Topographic Quad Map and NRCS Soil Survey with the property
boundaries outlined. Plan drawings, or other maps may be included at the applicant's discretion,
so long as the property is clearly defined. For administrative and distribution purposes, the
USACE requires information to be submitted on sheets no larger than 11 by 17-inch format;
however, DWQ may accept paperwork of any size. DWQ prefers full-size construction
drawings rather than a sequential sheet version of the full-size plans. If full-size plans are
reduced to a small scale such that the final version is illegible, the applicant will be informed that
the project has been placed on hold until decipherable maps are provided.
1. Name of project: Eno Forest (formerly Village by the Eno)
2. T.I.P. Project Number (NCDOT Only): NA
3. Property Identification Number (Tax PIN): 0814-04-84-7223 & 0814-04-84-8730
4. Location
County: Durham Nearest Town: Durham
Subdivision name (include phase/lot number): Eno Forest
Directions to site (include road numbers, landmarks, etc.):
4213 Guess Road (SR 1003), Durham, NC 27712
5. Site coordinates, if available (UTM or Lat/Long): NA
(Note - If project is linear, such as a road or utility line, attach a sheet that separately lists the
coordinates for each crossing of a distinct waterbody.)
6. Describe the existing land use or condition of the site at the time of this application:
Wooded with residential use
7. Property size (acres)
30.34
8. Nearest body of water (stream/river/sound/ocean/lake)
Eno River
9. River Basin: Neuse River
(Note - this must be one of North Carolina's seventeen designated major river basins. The
River Basin map is available at http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/admin/maps/.)
Page 4 of 12
10. Describe the purpose of the proposed work: Road construction.
11. List the type of equipment to be used to construct the project:
Grading and paving equipment.
12. Describe the land use in the vicinity of this project: Residential uses and a state park.
IV. Prior Project History
If jurisdictional determinations and/or permits have been requested and/or obtained for this
project (including all prior phases of the same subdivision) in the past, please explain. Include
the USACE Action ID Number, DWQ Project Number, application date, and date permits and
certifications were issued or withdrawn. Provide photocopies of previously issued permits,
certifications or other useful information. Describe previously approved wetland, stream and
buffer impacts, along with associated mitigation (where applicable). If this is a NCDOT project,
list and describe permits issued for prior segments of the same T.I.P. project, along with
construction schedules.
Important stream evaluation was performed 8/7/01. See attachment.
USACE ACTION ID: 2001121300
V. Future Project Plans
Are any additional permit requests anticipated for this project in the future? If so, describe the
anticipated work, and provide justification for the exclusion of this work from the current
application: No.
VI. Proposed Impacts to Waters of the United States/Waters of the State
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
wetlands, open water, and stream channels associated with the project. The applicant must also
provide justification for these impacts in Section VII below. All proposed impacts, permanent
and temporary, must be listed herein, and must be clearly identifiable on an accompanying site
plan. All wetlands and waters, and all streams (intermittent and perennial) must be shown on a
delineation map, whether or not impacts are proposed to these systems. Wetland and stream
evaluation and delineation forms should be included as appropriate. Photographs may be
included at the applicant's discretion. If this proposed impact is strictly for wetland or stream
mitigation, list and describe the impact in Section VIII below. If additional space is needed for
listing or description, please attach a separate sheet.
Page 5 of 12
1. Wetland Impacts
Wetland Impact
Site Number
(indicate on map)
Type of Impact* Area of
Impact
(acres) Located within
100-year Floodplain**
(yes/no) Distance to
Nearest Stream
(linear feet)
Type of Wetland***

* List each impact separately and identify temporary impacts. Impacts include, but are not limited to: mechanized clearing, grading, fill,
excavation, flooding, ditching/drainage, etc. For dams, separately list impacts due to both structure and flooding.
** 100-Year floodplains are identified through the Federal Emergency Management Agency's (FEMA) Flood Insurance Rate Maps
(FIRM), or FEMA-approved local floodplain maps. Maps are available through the FEMA Map Service Center at 1-800-358-9616, or
online at htty://www.ferm.gov.
*** List a wetland type that best describes wetland to be impacted (e.g., freshwater/saltwater marsh, forested wetland, beaver pond,
Carolina Bay, bog, etc.)
List the total acreage (estimated) of existing wetlands on the property: NA.
Total area of wetland impact proposed:
2. Stream Impacts, including all intermittent and perennial streams
Stream Impact
Site Number
(indicate on map)
Type of Impact* Length of
Impact
(linear feet)
Stream Name** Average Width
of Stream
Before Impact Perennial or
Intermittent?
(please specify)
1 Culvert 150 UT - Eno River 6' Perennial

* List each impact separately and identify temporary impacts. Impacts include, but are not limited to: culverts and associated rip-rap,
dams (separately list impacts due to both structure and flooding), relocation (include linear feet before and after, and net loss/gain),
stabilization activities (cement wall, rip-rap, crib wall, gabions, etc.), excavation, ditching/straightening, etc. If stream relocation is
proposed, plans and profiles showing the linear footprint for both the original and relocated streams must be included.
** Stream names can be found on USGS topographic maps. If a stream has no name, list as UT (unnamed tributary) to the nearest
downstream named stream into which it flows. USGS maps are available through the USGS at 1-800-358-9616, or online at
www.usgs. og_v. Several internet sites also allow direct download and printing of USGS maps (e.g., www.topozone.com,
www.mapquest.com, etc.).
Cumulative impacts (linear distance in feet) to all streams on site: 150
Page 6 of 12
3. Open Water Impacts, including Lakes, Ponds, Estuaries, Sounds, Atlantic Ocean and any
other Water of the U.S.
Open Water Impact
Site Number
(indicate on map)
Type of Impact* Area of
Impact
(acres) Name of Waterbody

(if applicable) Type of Waterbody
(lake, pond, estuary, sound,
bay, ocean, etc.)

* List each impact separately and identify temporary impacts. Impacts include, but are not limited to: fill, excavation, dredging,
flooding, drainage, bulkheads, etc.
4. Pond Creation
If construction of a pond is proposed, associated wetland and stream impacts should be
included above in the wetland and stream impact sections. Also, the proposed pond should
be described here and illustrated on any maps included with this application.
Pond to be created in (check all that apply): ® uplands ? stream ? wetlands
Describe the method of construction (e.g., dam/embankment, excavation, installation of
draw-down valve or spillway, etc.): Dam/embankment, excavation, and installation of
spillways
Proposed use or purpose of pond (e.g., livestock watering, irrigation, aesthetic, trout pond,
local stormwater requirement, etc.): Local stormwater requirement.
Size of watershed draining to pond: (1)0.7 ac.; Q7.1 ac.; M3.8 ac.; M8.6 ac.; (5)-25.5 ac.
Expected pond surface area: (0962 sf; (2)2,201 sf; (3)4,244 sf; (4)5,578 sf, (5)5,967 sf
VII. Impact Justification (Avoidance and Minimization)
Specifically describe measures taken to avoid the proposed impacts. It may be useful to provide
information related to site constraints such as topography, building ordinances, accessibility, and
financial viability of the project. The applicant may attach drawings of alternative, lower-impact
site layouts, and explain why these design options were not feasible. Also discuss how impacts
were minimized once the desired site plan was developed. If applicable, discuss construction
techniques to be followed during construction to reduce impacts.
Crossing the stream is the only way to access that portion of the property.
Page 7 of 12
VIII. Mitigation
DWQ - In accordance with 15A NCAC 2H .0500, mitigation may be required by the NC
Division of Water Quality for projects involving greater than or equal to one acre of impacts to
freshwater wetlands or greater than or equal to 150 linear feet of total impacts to perennial
streams.
USACE - In accordance with the Final Notice of Issuance and Modification of Nationwide
Permits, published in the Federal Register on March 9, 2000, mitigation will be required when
necessary to ensure that adverse effects to the aquatic environment are minimal. Factors
including size and type of proposed impact and function and relative value of the impacted
aquatic resource will be considered in determining acceptability of appropriate and practicable
mitigation as proposed. Examples of mitigation that may be appropriate and practicable include,
but are not limited to: reducing the size of the project; establishing and maintaining wetland
and/or upland vegetated buffers to protect open waters such as streams; and replacing losses of
aquatic resource functions and values by creating, restoring, enhancing, or preserving similar
functions and values, preferable in the same watershed.
If mitigation is required for this project, a copy of the mitigation plan must be attached in order
for USACE or DWQ to consider the application complete for processing. Any application
lacking a required mitigation plan or NCWRP concurrence shall be placed on hold as
incomplete. An applicant may also choose to review the current guidelines for stream restoration
in DWQ's Draft Technical Guide for Stream Work in North Carolina, available at
htlp://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands/stnngide.html.
1. Provide a brief description of the proposed mitigation plan. The description should provide
as much information as possible, including, but not limited to: site location (attach directions
and/or map, if offsite), affected stream and river basin, type and amount (acreage/linear feet)
of mitigation proposed (restoration, enhancement, creation, or preservation), a plan view,
preservation mechanism (e.g., deed restrictions, conservation easement, etc.), and a
description of the current site conditions and proposed method of construction. Please attach
a separate sheet if more space is needed.
NA.
Page 8 of 12
2. Mitigation may also be made by payment into the North Carolina Wetlands Restoration
Program (NCWRP) with the NCWRP's written agreement. Check the box indicating that
you would like to pay into the NCWRP. Please note that payment into the NCWRP must be
reviewed and approved before it can be used to satisfy mitigation requirements. Applicants
will be notified early in the review process by the 401/Wetlands Unit if payment into the
NCWRP is available as an option. For additional information regarding the application
process for the NCWRP, check the NCWRP website at http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/wm/index.htm. If
use of the NCWRP is proposed, please check the appropriate box on page three and provide
the following information:
Amount of stream mitigation requested (linear feet): NA.
Amount of buffer mitigation requested (square feet): NA.
Amount of Riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres): NA.
Amount of Non-riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres): NA.
Amount of Coastal wetland mitigation requested (acres): NA.
IX. Environmental Documentation (DWQ Only)
Does the project involve an expenditure of public funds or the use of public (federal/state/local)
land?
Yes ? No
If yes, does the project require preparation of an environmental document pursuant to the
requirements of the National or North Carolina Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
Note: If you are not sure whether a NEPA/SEPA document is required, call the SEPA
coordinator at [phone] to review current thresholds for environmental documentation.
Yes ? No ?
If yes, has the document review been finalized by the State Clearinghouse? If so, please attach a
copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval letter.
Yes ? No ?
X. Proposed Impacts on Riparian and Watershed Buffers (DWQ Only)
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
required state and local buffers associated with the project. The applicant must also provide
justification for these impacts in Section VII above. All proposed impacts must be listed herein,
and must be clearly identifiable on the accompanying site plan. All buffers must be shown on a
map, whether or not impacts are proposed to the buffers. Correspondence from the DWQ
Regional Office may be included as appropriate. Photographs may also be included at the
applicant's discretion.
Will the project impact protected riparian buffers identified within 15A NCAC 2B .0233
(Meuse), 15A NCAC 2B .0259 (Tar-Pamlico), 15A NCAC 2B .0250 (Randleman Rules and
Water Supply Buffer Requirements), or other (please identify )?
Page 9 of 12
Yes ® No ? If you answered "yes", provide the following information:
Identify the square feet and acreage of impact to each zone of the riparian buffers. If buffer
mitigation is required calculate the required amount of mitigation by applying the buffer
multipliers.
Zone* Impact
(square feet) Multiplier Required
Mitigation
1 8,450 3
2 5,286 1.5
Total 13,736
* Zone 1 extends out 30 teet perpendicular trom near bank of cnannet; Gone z extends an
additional 20 feet from the edge of Zone 1.
If buffer mitigation is required, please discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (i.e., Donation
of Property, Conservation Easement, Riparian Buffer Restoration / Enhancement, Preservation or
Payment into the Riparian Buffer Restoration Fund). Please attach all appropriate information as
identified within 15A NCAC 2B .0242 or. 0260.
NA.
XI. Stormwater (DWQ Only)
Describe impervious acreage (both existing and proposed) versus total acreage on the site.
Discuss stormwater controls proposed in order to protect surface waters and wetlands
downstream from the property.
The existing impervious surface is 2.59%. The proposed maximum impervious surface is 24%.
Rip-rap will be used at all outlets. Level spreaders will be used at all detention ponds.
XII. Sewage Disposal (DWQ Only)
Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of
wastewater generated from the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
The wastewater generated by the proposed project will be pumped away from the site.
XIII. Violations (DWQ Only)
Is this site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500) or any Buffer Rules?
Yes ? No
Is this an after-the-fact permit application?
Page 10 of 12
Yes ? No
XIV. Other Circumstances (Optional):
It is the applicant's responsibility to submit the application sufficiently in advance of desired
construction dates to allow processing time for these permits. However, an applicant may
choose to list constraints associated with construction or sequencing that may impose limits on
work schedules (e.g., draw-down schedules for lakes, dates associated with Endangered and
Threatened Species, accessibility problems, or other issues outside of the applicant's control).
NA.
T jil ?n f+ /V so.c? Corm 10P AJ I, I NC- -
Applicant/Agent's Signature Date
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant is provided.)
US Army Corps Of Engineers Field Offices and County Coverage
Asheville Regulatory Field Office Alexander Cherokee Iredell Mitchell
US Army Corps of Engineers Avery Clay Jackson Polk
151 Patton Avenue Buncombe Cleveland Lincoln Rowan
Room 208 Burke Gaston Macon Rutherford
Asheville, NC 28801-5006 Cabarrus Graham Madison Stanley
Telephone: [phone] Caldwell Haywood McDowell Swain
Fax: [phone] Catawba Henderson Mecklenburg Transylvania
Raleigh Regulatory Field Office Alamance Durham Johnston Rockingham
US Army Corps Of Engineers Alleghany EdQecombe Lee Stokes
6508 Falls of the Neuse Road Ashe Franklin Nash Surry
Suite 120 Caswell Forsyth Northampton Vance
Raleigh, NC 27615 Chatham Granville Orange Wake
Telephone: [phone] Davidson Guilford Person Warren
Fax: [phone] Davie Halifax Randolph Wilkes
Washington Regulatory Field Office Beaufort Currituck Jones
US Army Corps Of Engineers Bertie Dare Lenoir
Post Office Box 1000 Camden Gates Martin
Washington, NC 27889-1000 Carteret* Green Pamlico
Telephone: [phone] Chowan Hertford Pasquotank
Fax: [phone] Craven Hyde Perquimans
Wilmington Regulatory Field Office
US Army Corps Of Engineers
Post Office Box 1890
Wilmington, NC 28402-1890
Anson Duplin Onslow
Bladen Harnett Pender
Brunswick Hoke- Richmond
Carteret Montgomery Robeson
Pitt
Tyrrell
Washington
Wayne
CQ?
Union
Watauga
Yancey
Wilson
Yadkin
*Croatan National Forest Only
Page 11 of 12
\ ,
I~ i 1
TREE COVERAGE CALCULATION `i \ 1b•0 4' I I i ~ \ ~ ~ ; j „ l
..w ~ I TREE PROTECTED NUMBER TREE COVERAGE , \ , 28"POPLAR w ' 4
DIAMETER AREA OF TREES CREDIT ' ~ , e'Paru,R 2'HIa~oR 1...,.2a•aORu 22•BIRCH \ 22"OAK r,~ .a r_
(IN,) (SF) (sF) ~ I I I y: ~ 24- • I I _ __w~., GUM! . .`.'20"OAKS.,.."..... . ",OAKS..,. s GU \ . I ( ~ W Z 0 : ,'2b'R4PU~,r' ~ 24 8M4 1 ~ ? 32 OAK I A p
18 1018 5 7634 ~ 4•oAK I I r..20'i I I I CE „B„ I « IOKOR , , . if~OR . , . '.~:~.?4"Q111(. q , 1 v,~ i a 8 8 ~1 ~L ~
20 1257 5 9425 I , OPEN SPA ~ , AK - I I I ~a, I I 22 1521 4 9123 I I I I ~ LOT 21 ~ I r _ 1 ' ~ \ LOT~Q, ~ I I \ ~ s Q ~ Lk N
24 1810 5 13572 r I t I ~ ] ~ i O'HICKORY ~ 4'BMiEET 4 ~ ~ I ( A\ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 1 OAK
2124 1 3186 I LOT 33 I i t k 2r o•. ~c 28 i LOT 32 I G~ a 0' t , . I 4'SWEET I I z01A1, ~ 3 "POtjlAl~'~ \ ~ ; m ~ V • ~ o a I ' ~ ,
I ° I e I I I \ ~ ~ OAK ' 1 ` . / / 1 1 ti,. 1 ~ I ¢ W a
PROTECTIVE TREE PROTECTED AREA r, 1 I I I m..• 28 POPLAR / / o•oAKl1 . 3" 1 t \ ~ / 22 OAK.. \ ~ x 0"DAK-1 . ~+i4., ~ \ `O'AK \ ~l Q „J N ~ LL Q
SAVE AREA AC. r' L--------------J I --'i" ~ k Ik / / s 180AK 1 18"OAK: 1 } 1 ~ \ ( ~ ~ j ~ U 1 . , i . \ 1 20 OAK ~ \ i 4 V ~ 1 ~ LLl ~ ~ ~ ~ `N
1 A 2,07 ~ I ~ ^ \ I' LOT 20 / / a z, a
C 0,35 I ~2 / d r / / a 4 ~ 1 , ~ OAK 24 ~FR ` Q ~ ~ a
r------- , I ~Y D t.3o I ~ ~ 2o'oAK / LOT 19 I " r I LOT 22 2 ~ ie / z zo•oAKI 20 oAK~ 1O`. swEET .tAlM . a ~ LOT i l i ` t U W ~
E 0.18 I I I ( I I ~ i / / } ~ F 0,25 r I i I I r ~ F/ / , 1 , , . _ ' I ' ! 26"OAK ~ 5 Z 0 ~ ` ~ / ; 1 , ..~.`.`.'..'.~.~28"0 ~~'~~44"OMK ~ I "C"(W~ l ~ U m w ~
G 0.05 I I I 80 OAK I I 2 I ~ ~ \ / ~ / I ' , A .1.. ~ 1 18'POPLAR ~ 4 - `i ~ ~ o ~ U \ ¢ ~ 12 PINE, I _ ( _,_~w_ W g=0
H 0,34 t I I I i e I ~ ~~R ~ , ~ I 0.17 1 I ,~a j I i Q~ ~ I ~ ? y~ ~ I LOT 34 LOT 31 I I ~ ) ~ ~ ~ .4. 1. 20 AKA I ~ I t,
TREE COVERAGE CREDIT AREA: 42,939 SF (0.98 AC.) I i I I O ~ ~ r ~ F Y ~ "HICIWRY , , ,
I 3a APLE ~ ~ ~ i , PROTECTIVE TREE SAVE AREA: 5.14 AC. I I I I ~ ~ ~ / ; ~ / , .".1"2`PMIE L ~ ~ l ~ ~ ~ ! 112`PINE ,
-----------------J ~ 1 ~ ~ i1 r TOTAL TREE COVERAGE AREA: 6.13 AC, (20.296 OF TOTAL AREA) ~ I I I ~ ~ \ \ i , I . 1 I ~ 4 q 4 ~ , LOT 8 z 13, ' . , 20 CAR.`:.;.
TREE COVERAGE AREA REQUIRED: 6.07 AC. (20~ OF TOTAL E) I ~ ~ ~ ~ ` ~ ~ I
~ ~ LOT 1~ LOT 1 4s oAK 1 , / , . ' ~ ~ a.. ~ \ I , ,PROTECTIVE IREE ,
~ I ,4 I I \ I i LQT 23 ~ ,l I ~ 3 : , .h,... , ; \ 1 ~ ( I , 12"PNE, 'SAVE AREA "C" I ,uHla~t>R \1 I L--------------~ ; 0.35 AC. I~ , .
SYMBOL LEGEND r I I ~ I I LET 24 \ s..~ , . . , 1 LOT-12 ,
r LOT 35 I I I I I I I ~ r\ t~ ~ - lf.....i A ~ \ f '.20"POPLAR /
T 30 r r I ~,.<,.~~~~.i_ r v I I I ~ \ i 1 OAK 1„
EXISTING TREE LOCATION I cxNSntucnaN I I \ a ~ I ~ ~ uM1T5 I L- t 22 p~ 4 I , I i .q , { m...
L ( I 4 . \ \ e I ~ 1 a , , 1 y y i LQT `7 I t4k NE ~ ~ 1e oAK~~
1 PINE, I I I ' . , , ~ _ e„ 4 \ I I t 14"PIN
TREE TO BE REMOVED ~ 1 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 1~~ ~ / I?R01E \ \ ~ I 18"PINE , ,
4'MAPLE \ I \ J I ~ 22.PINE..,.,,..... .
/ / r I LOT 17 I ..LOT 17 t.3r~~ AC' 4.. - ti~PnrE t3"~NV~, 18~ P81E... 2"CEDAR ~ 14"PINE
ORY I I / r ? ~ ~ . <sFto~ECA ~ c ROOT ZONE PROTECTION AREA t i ' I A," f2'PINE , , ~ /
~ I OT 36 ~ LOT 29 / ate. ~ . 1~ t LOT - 5 I I t2:HICt~ , ~ ~ DAK 1 12"PIE I • ~ . ~ ` ~ y"P~ .q OAK,.. ---~~,1
~ I 1 t / , I I I 7~0"OAK L _ _ , ~ ~ le.._ .,rte I--I
I 1 V / ~ - - ~20 OAK „'10~OiYt~ ~ ~ \ I v ~ I ` LOT 6 1
/ - \l 1 M.
X - TREE PROTEC110N FENCE I t ~ I''--__ ~ 1 E I OAK - \ ` 1 e \ I
- \ - ~ / / LOT 2 I ~ I ~ r` - 2Q'oAK t +aoAK ~ r
~ 200 / \ : l \ 3O' ACCESS 1 ~ / \ s, \ \ EASEMENT J
~ I LOT 27 I? t t / t 0 \ ~ .39,` ~ ~
LOT 37 ~ ~ ~ \ I I 1 ` < ~ ' 22'a r ~ , , \ I I I I t t / 2D" AK 18'DAK j " / ~4 ~ \ ' q /.2'' ~ .
r 1 ~ > \ I I I I LOT 26 t t / a LOT I F~,, coNSTRUCno~ ~ / ~ I I I I It t \ / C E..,./ i LOT 16 ~
9' ~ 3 ~ 2e`o q
~I ,~_..0 1 ~i ~i / / ~ _J ~ / ~ ~~i / ~ / / \ ~ ~ ~ / pAK I'
- / I v ~ LOT. 5 ,
1 i i / / ~ 1 ~ /
r 1 / / ~ ~ ~ 2.OAK. ~ LOT 13 / ~ - y f~.. l5 v • ..4 ~ ~ i ~ v t
/ / t ~ LOT 15 / ~ LOT 40 \ • /~V A\ I ~ s ~ ~ \ 1 'OAK 4 q ~bAK ,
/ \ 1 , ~ / ~o'eEECH j / ~ / A
4' / a i \ / \ / 'I \ r ~ \ .
r LOT 39 / , %Ie«arc \ 1 r r° 2ooAx -LOT 41 a / / ~ ~ / " / / PROTECTIVE TREE vy ~ I ~ ~ I ~
~ 1 „ / 36 OAK 4e' / a ze auc ~ - ~ . - ) ~ 24.oAK / LOT 38 1 OPEN SPACE G / I r----~---'" / ~ , ~4.oAK i / : , SAVE AREA ~E' ~ t I
- f 4• 30 BEECH r 1 / n ~ 1 1 • , 0.18 AC,' ~ P \ , I ~ caNSr~ucnoN / ~ ~ t, to
a 18.OAK . / r ~ / \ 4 • ~ 9 1 ~ _ I / / r f...~ / LOT 14 ~r j, s I
. . oAa I LOT 42 r r / / v / f e~'"" S ~ ' I ,
1' . ' . ~220AK\ , a .I I r LOT 43 / / a ~ ~ . . / 6P 33 ~ ~ 'I 32 OAK 5~V1~ ?O1~ ~ 1 , ~ ° ~y0, A s
14" 12 PIN . ~ ~Z4"0 1a"OAK M..._,_. / _ / ; / J. 12"SYC, , . . j . 2a OA ~ _ / ~ i9.OAK / / \ ~ .1 ti IN , r / , / 20•A ~ \ / 1 \ " / \ 1
P 4.. 0 . AMOAF,, . 4 1a'PINE ~ 20 OAK \ ~ ~ ~ 1j! pjtE'.. q I / 20'OAK ~ . / 38AAK / \ 18 OAK ~ \ ' " f i , a 38",DAK 1 , f LOT 2 ~ 1, /
.4' . 2•$YCAiI ...1 OAK 12: , lqf ~ ~ ~ ~ / i M, /
~tOTEC1IVE 1REE _ , ~ ,,l"MICK accar . a . ~ \ 1 r / ro"oAK / SAVE.. AREA "I"' a'PI 12'SICAHOR " q" , , J / / t "GAK'. ' •o a / LOT 44 f" ~ ~ ~ , - " 3soAK , i LOT 4 ~~v
a» Ac, , / 14 0 21iICKOR 14ORY Q a 20.OAK / ,0 OAK / .s / \ / < , a / ~ i c~ : 2e•oAK
OAK T• / ' / / / 'PACK Y 38"0 ~ a ```1111111111f1ff~4
ICNORY. . ~ 0 Y.... / / ,r , ~y ~ / ~ , .Y 50 , 1'. 1 ' /i PINE'. 18 / 30"0 :.1 ' ~
4.' PROTECTIVE 1REE Eay, . , . , . \ \ / ~ / 1.,': ~ ' ~HICKORY,'9 "ASH . 22" AK / ! ~ / ~ t - SEAL
/ ~ 1 ~ a ~ LOT 3 ~ 1~: 1 = =
~ a34 AC. ...:ORE:.. / , LOT 45 , j \ ~ ~ r F : 1 . ~ ~ 15456 ~ a le"POPLAR 18'NIG( Y f~, 4 ~ ll: ~ : ~ t ~
, caNSmucn - y i, i.. I i ~ / OAK ~i l- . • r' OAK 20'OAK V
, ~ 4
DO NOT WRAP TRUNK; MARK THE NORTH ~ q ' " 12«OAK / SIDE OF THE TREE IN THE NURSERY AND AVOID PURCHASING TREES MITFI TWO / ~i~Nl..... 2 12•~11acaR I 1 ffllnuunll`
LOCATE TO THE NORTH IN THE FIELD LEADERS OR REMOVE ONE AT PLANTING, 12• p~ ~ : ~ 2,OAK / ' pTHERWiSE, DO NOT PRUF~ TREE AT RAL / . PROTEC 4'OAK 18'OAK 4 ~ 1 1
PLANTING EXCEPT FOR SPECIFIC STRUCTU ~ N , ~ ~ CORRECTIO S. •~~~~~SAVE ARE • ,18'FACI(ORY.~,',~ , 30"8EE •28`OAK + 1
ii q ~ . ~ ouc 1 1 4 / iD"SWEET'OUM 30 X t m = _ _ _
,'i r ~ j PROTECTIVE 11~EE 20"0r4K 1 ~ ~ ~ ~ 2o`oAK 12'M , 3~oAK~ 1 J J J J
it \ SAVE AREA DO NOT STAKE TREES EXCEPT 0,05 AQ, t • / ` 20" AK." 22;0 ~ ~
I ~ ; 5' POSTS ~ WHERE SPECIFIED BY LANDSCAPE ~ ! I 24 AK 24" AK Z,, \ to
ARCHITECT, IF STAKING IS g ~ ~ 4 NECESSARY, USE TIMD OPP0611G
STAKES MATH SEPARATE TIES, "`1. REMOVE STAKING AT THE END OF t ~1 ` 4 ~ 3 5 S o 1. w
THE f1RST GROWMIG SEASON. I t~~, w w o: N 0 w ~
NOTES: ' TRUNK FLARE ANO TOP OF ROOT BALL = 1, TREE PROTECTION FENCING MUST , ' H ~ ~ W ~ ~ ~ LOT 1 a 1 ~ ; ••:38.oA~; ; . ~ \ _ Q \ I a
SHOULD BE AT GRADE RV WELL DRAM~D ~ BE IN PLACE PRIM TO ANY ~ 4 ~ D_ ~ W 22"OAK ~ 4"0 \ \ uVi Q
SOIL, UP TO 4 INCHES (10 CM) ABOVE ~ DEM TION LAND DISTURBANCE OR GRADE tN POORLY DRAINED SOILS. ~ ~ ~ ' 24"OAK ~ .q \ ~ } \ 12 ~ Z ~ Q Z ~
~ ~ 2• (5 CM) BARK MULCH; DO NOT PLACE ~j ISSUANCE OF A GRADING PERMIT. MULCH IN CONTACT WITH TREE TRUNK. ~ ~ \ _ ~ C7
2. SIGNS IN BOTH ENGLISH AND SPANISH ~ W ~ a Z 20 ~ ~ ~ 1 ~ or - O -
SHALL BE BE PLACE IN TREE PROTECTION ~ AREAS. THE SIGNS SHOULD READ, TREE ; 1 - n. J J z ~1~~~~ w \ ~ ~ ~ z
12 MAX NOTE: WDTH OF PLANTING HOLE IS 3 TIMES PROTECTION AREA 0 TRESPASSING" AND 4 (10 CM) RAISED RING OF S0~ TO M ~ - ae DAK:. ! W Q oAK 24•oAK i • NOTES: o. w J
ROOT BALL DIAMETER IN HIGHLY COMPACTED T ZONA PROTECTORA PARR LOS ARBOLES , ~ DIRECT WATER INTO Roo BALL - / OR CLAY SOIL; 2 TIMES THE ROOT DIAMETER ESPEgALLY IMPORTANT If TOP OF \ ` 4 / \ NOTE "A" ~
PROHIBIDO ENTRA", ~ MINIMUM IN ALL OTHERS ~ ~ ' R00T BALL IS RAISED ABOVE GRADE 2' 1 ~ ` ~ rt AT THE ST ~ ~ \ . _ ~ , ART OF GRADING INVOLVING THE LOWERING w \ \
) ~ 3. SIGN SPACING WILL BE AT 75' INTERVALS. ' i ; `t ~ ! OF EXISTING GRADE AROUND A TREE OR STRIPPING ¢ N N \ T o ~ \ ao OF OPSOII, A CLEAN, SHARP, VERTICAL CUT SHALL \ \ N \
E 't ~~:.t , / BE MADE AT THE EDGE OF TREE SAVE AREA AT THE °J ~ ~ / ~ AM nM
~ ~ S E E AS OTHER EROSION CONTROL MEASURES 1x"P~LAR • b ~ ARE INSTALLED. THE TREE PROTECTION FENCING w
- SHALL BE INSTALLED ON THE SIDE OF THE CUT ~ 1 Y.~' ~ ~ N 17
pft01~C11VE: , ' ~ • FARTHEST AWAY FROM THE TREE TRUNK ANO SHALL 14"St~ET. ~ AVE :AREA '"A".. : , REMAIN IN PLACE UNTIL ALL CONSTRUCTION IN THE Z
AN RANGE PLASTIC FENCING ~ ~ :1 ~ ~ ' METAL POSTS D 0 , ~.p. S .1 ~f W w:y~ ~ s. IY r~ \ DATE: 207; AC:.. ~ ' ~ • " " MCINITY OF THE TREES IS COMPLETE, NO STORAGE 8I01l01
11 : TP~f XY~ r o. w •r t~' ~ ~~~.+1r ! ' ~ - ~ OF MATERIALS, FILL, OR EQUIPMENT AND NO dOB N0: ~ TRESPASSING SHALL BE ALLOWED WITHIN THE 00208
Dlc WaDE PLANTING HOLE ° k,~''•~~~ ~ ~I?-, ~fi., STREE TREE CALCUL ONS \ BOUNDARY OF THE PROTECTED AREA.
WTH TAPERED SIDES =f` * EXTEND STAKES INTO UNDISTURBED SOIL N0. OF TREES ~ FRONTAGE/30 FT \ DRAWING: \ 00-208
\ NOTE "8" \ STREET TREES SHALL BE PLANTED IN ACCORDANCE DESIGNED; ~Wp
CUT BURLAP, ROPE AND WIRE 4"-6• (10-15 CM) DEEPER THAN BASKET AWAY FROM TOP AND SIDES ROOT ZONE BALL FOR LOWERED STREET TREE CALCULATIONS STREET TREE CALCULATIONS IONS ~ \ ~ V` WITH SECTION 10.5. STREET TREE STANDARDS, AND
OF ROOT BALL PLANTING HOLE AS NEED WITH NOTES LOT FRONTAGE N0, OF TREES LOT FRONTAGE N0. OF TREES POOR DRAINAGE 1 534,74 18 20 88.44 3 )F TREES SHALL BE AT LEAST TWO AND ON HALF INCH 2 1 2 DRAWN' LMH ~
SET BALL ON UNDISTURBED SOIL TO 1. MFERE SEVERAL TREES WILL BE PLANTED CLOSE 3 CALIPER. CHECKED:
PR T NG PACK BACKFlLL SOIL AROUND BASE TOGETHER SUCH THAT THEY WILL LIKELY SHARE ROOT • 2 213.47 8 21 119.80 4 EVEN SETTU SPACE TILL IN SOIL AMENDMENTS TO A DEPTH OF 4-8 4 STREET TREE CALCULATIONS STREET TREE TYPES 1. ACER RUBRUM -RED MAPLE NOTE "C" 3 LOT FRONTAGE N0, OF TREES 2 ACER SACCHARUM -RED MAPLE HORIZONTAL SCALE.
OF Roor eau. TO SraeluZE; ALLOW 3 64.61 3 22 65.71 3 i REST OF BACKFlLL TO SETTLE (10-15 CM) OVER 1HE ENTIRE AREA, 8 83,61 3 23 81.05 2 37 3. FRAXINUS AMERICANA - WHI1E ASH ALL LANDSCAPING MUST BE IN PLACE PRIOR TO t" = 60' 2 53.38 2 4. UOUIDAMBER STYRACIFLUA - AMERK;AN SWFETt;<1M REQUEST FOR A CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY OR
NATURALLY, OR TAMP LIGHTLY 2, fOR CONTAINER-GROWN TREES, USE FINGERS OR SMALL 7 100.00 4 24 245.0 9 «IF PLANTING HOLES ARE DUG WITH 9 38 148.64 5 S. GUERCUS RUBRA -NORTHERN RED OAK CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE. VERTICAL SCALE:
A LARGER AUGER, BREAKING GOWN HAND TOOLS TO PULL THE ROOTS OUT OF THE OUTER 8 108,01 4 25 244.98 9 THE SIDES WITH A SHOVEL CAN LAYER OF POTTING SOiI; THEN CUT OR PULL APART 39 2 NA 9 50.00
,.,,,..r. ,~.,wr „~s,,,~T<e TLIC Aft\ITA,AIt•O 9 az nn 3 28 149.90 5 5 40 s~.1~ 4 NOTE "D" SHFFT Nn_
ELIMINATE GLAZING AND CREATE THE MT rtuuW wRwnV ma rcnimalcn yr me wi.nn.~n. 00 4 41 97.70 4 EACH LANDSCAPING COMPLIANCE INSPECTION AFTER
PREFERRED SLOPING SIDE 10 51.00 2 27 94, 4 3• DURING THE DESIGN PHASES, CONFIRM THAT WATER 11 48.08 2 28 133.13 5 5 42 124.09 5 THE INITIAL INSPECTION WILL INCUR A =100 RE-INSPECTION FEE. PAYMENT MUST BE RECEIVED
DRAINS OUT OF THE SOIL; USE LOWERED PLANTING HOLE 5 43 137.82 5 BY THE DURHAM CITY COUNTY PLANNING
TREE PLANTING DETAIL (B & B PLANTS) DEPTH AND DESIGN ALTERNATIVE DRAINAGE SYSTEM AS 12 177.97 6 29 134.36 5 ADAPTED FROM "ARCHITECTURAL GRAPHIC STANDARDS) REWIRED. 13 163.67 6 30 125.10 5 1998 AND WATSON do HIMELICK "PRINCIPLES AND PRACTICE 4. THOROUGHLY SOAK THE TREE ROOT BALL AND ADJACENT 14 266.82 9 31 105.00 4 5 44 108.71 4 DEPARTMENT PRIOR TO RE-INSPECTION.
4 45 247.15 9 5 OS A 146.24 5 " _ NOTE "E"
OF PLANTING TREES AND SHRUBS" 1997 PREPARED SOIL SEVERAL TIMES DURING THE FIRST 15 249,56 9 32 137.00 5 0 MONTH AFTER PLANTING AND REGULARLY THROUGHOUT 16 78.70 3 33 118,00 4 0! 4 OS B 15.00 1 SCALE 1" 60' ROOT ZONE PROTECTION AREAS ARE ONE FOOT
THE FOLLOWING TWO SUMMERS. 17 93,49 4 34 103.50 4 0' 4 OS C 758.52 26 RADIUS FOR EVERY INCH OF DIAMETER OF OF 60' 0 60' 120' EXISTING TREES. NO DISTURBANCE ALLOWED WITHIN
5. THE PLANTING PROCESS IS SIMILAR FOR DECIDUOUS AND 18 81.35 3 35 99.98 4 FE 4 FD 118.01 4 THIS AREA. OF 5
EVERGREEN TREES 19 68.44 3 36 74,73 3 3
I

~ N30'2o'33"w CLUSTER SUBDIVISION DATA Z N3o'zo'33" TOTAL AREA: 30.34 ACRES (1,321,649 SF) p
, " ~ '33"W I N30'2O'3 "W \ N30'2 33 W ~ N3O'2O 33 W 33"W 238'x7' 88.22' AREA IN NEW STREETS: 3.05 ACRES p ~
157.15' L1 148.02' 131.60' 271.38' G ',1,7E,O4',• ~ N3O'20 33 W , , \ AREA IN OPEN SPACE: 2,66 ACRE Z U S ~
103.40' a~'• ~ ~ , . I- ~ Ts~: r ~ " ~ - 'OPEN.SPACE A,. o. W J .o OPEN SPACE "H - - ~ n r-------------- 1-- , ~ o ~ - AREA IN FUTURE DEVELOPMENT: 2.78 ACRES w ~
I I ~ ~ ~ r ~ I I ~ ~ ~ ~ „ I 87,817 SF,~,'; . , ~ \ I \ AREA IN LOTS: 21,85 ACRES w ~ 13 p Z ~ .o
3 I I 8 N 11,411 SF ~ J J N223~.02.'W.'~ , , ','0' . I I ~ ' ~ TOT LOT ~ I '.'9 O ,.o ~ ~ . J \ 6 TOTAL NUMBER OF LOTS: 43 - Z ~ . 9 o J h 9~ AVERAGE LOT SIZE: 22,134 SF (7 ~o
m l ~ I ~ y N ~ ~ ','Y , ~ , . \ LOT 10 N I \ A~ Z 0 ;',',T• y~ tii~ J \ ti Sj ZONING: R-20 w U ~
N LOT 33 w I I LOT 21 J ! ~y , ~ .y c' 1 I ~ ~ LOT 32 N3o'2o'33•w , , ~ 20,030 SF ~ 8 1 J ,W 1 ~ , , . , ' ' 'y ~ . 20 295 SF ~ ~ i ~ ~ ~ 9? I \ , ~ WATERSHED DISTRICT: E-B WATERSHED
I I ~ 8 I 20,005 SF I y 22,288 SF r $ ~ J I ~ INSIDE CITY LIMITS, INSIDE UGA o
7• I LOT 9 ~ PROPOSED USE: RESIDENTIAL W ~ • , - ~ \ MINIMUM EXTERIOR LOT SIZE: 20 000 SF m ~
I m I s,, ~ J r ! LOT 20 1 . , • . x ~ L 20,178 SF \ , w i \ MINIMUM EXTERIOR LOT WIDTH: 100' ? N o0 Q
N D W • ~I r r , \ EXTERIOR LOT MINIMUM SETBACKS: 35 FRONT; ~ \ ~ _cv~
I ~-------J ~ ~ ~ \ 17,261 SF / 182.33 ~ ~ •0 , , , , , • I LOT 22 0 2 ~ J / %pROPD$ED 30 ~ y . , \ \ 30 TOTAL SIDE;12 SIDE ~ ~ ~
~ / /CITY OF DURHAM ' ' ~ _ _ _ ~ 17,448 SF ~ J ',y , . , , LOT 11 o U ~ o ~ \ , 17,5 STREET SIDE; 25 REAR w z ~ r . N 15,388 SF _ _ ~
m ~ r - - - - - - 1 / / / SANITARY SEWER ,y , I I I ~ ~ EASEMENT - W Q = c ,29.W MINIMUM INTERIOR LOT SIZE. 10,000 SF w ~ U ~ 3
I I I ~ 1 ~ / / (SEE NOTE A ~ •n , I I N37'S2 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 0 ~ MINIMUM INTERIOR LOT WIDTH: 50 ~ ~ 137,42 _ ~ o_ ~ ~
o ~ V ~ I 1 ~ . ~ I LOT 34 I 8 I I I " x / / ~ , a" ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ I 20`~r~e w _ 1t LOT 19 '~0 ~ , IN I T ~ ~ a ` "1 TER OR LO MINIMUM SETBACKS: 17,5 FRONT; p ~ _ o ~ 1, U o o a~
~ 20 014 SF I m I LOT 31 I e ~ 1~.1r 1 , m 15,332 SF I ~ ~ , 17,503 SF / / 1 I 5 TOTAL SIDE; 7,5 SIDE w Z iJ m w h 8 n ~ ~ - a~nU
.f9~ J I ti 17,5 STREET SIDE; 12.5 REAR = Z a ~ - „ ~ Z o~0
~ i~ ? \ I , x,55, ~ 1 g J LOT 8 I ~ U Q 9• \ ~ ~ ; STREET CONSTRUCTION DATA ~ ~
033 ~ ~ \ n ~ ~ / ~ I LENGTH OF NEW STREETS: 26 F T TA Q n_ \ / 20,055 SF ~ 35 L 0 L
2oa.a1' V ~ LOT 23 ~ ~ / ~ ~ ` ~ ` LOT 18 ~ , n _ ~ I STREET CONSTRUCTION IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CITY OF „ ~
~o i ~ i \ . - - - N3o'2 w 16 580 SF ~ . , ~ 148.oz' 17,303 SF , I DURHAM STANDARDS. LOT 12 ~
I I N I ~ LOT 24 \ \ ~ a I \ 1 L---------J I NQIES, 15,353 SF "
O• I I f ~ ~ _ ~ 1 ~ ~ ~ PROPOSED 30 CITY I ~ 18,634 SF \ ~ \ ~ ~ \ S30'20 33 E PROPOSED 10 FOOT HIDE dTY aF DURHAM SANITARY SEVER EASEMENT.
~ I LOT 35 I ~ 8 ~ N I ~ , OF DURHAM SANITARY N , , ~ dl N 1 , , 21517 SF ~ LOT 30 SEWER EASEMENT ~ CURVE 4 \ , „ 229.70' 9UB,ECT TO TERMS STATED Ri THE DECLARATION IN REV. ESTATE BOOK , - - - - { 15i0, PAGE 986 NO STRUCTURES, FILL, EMBANKMENTS, TREES OR
A I F PT ¦ z1+68.49 16,026 SF (SEE NOTE A R tso.oo' 3"E . , „ / d T T 8 ~ OBSTRUCTIONS PERMITTED 1M1H61 THE EASEMEN EXCEP ACCORDING TO 71106E TERNS
\ I L . 414.zz' 1 Sao . „ PROPOSED I CITY STORM L20 NOTE 'B'
o, L-------------J ! D~•38-11-60 ~ 151.60 „ I I I , . DRAINAGE EASEME oppp LOT 7 I STREAM ERIiFER: 50 FOOT IMDE UNdSTURBED SIREALI BUFFER EAdI 9DE , \ , „ 00 Z OF STREAM, MEASURED FROM TOP OF BANG NO d.EARMIC OR GRADING
S30'20'33"E ~ ~ ~ ~ g ~ , , , I , ~ S?O~r / N 228.89 ~ , ~ ? ~ E EE NOTE C ~ 28 249 SF I + 07FIER THAN SELECTIVE 7HINIIINO AND aRDINARY MNN7ENANCE OF EIQSnNO M ~ p, m VEOETARON PERMITTED,
- - ~ ~ ' ~ / 13B.Oa 9.40 , , „ „ I J 1S ~ PROPOSED 16 CITY c ~o "c.
r ~ ~ ' / Z I LOT 29 ~ / W I \ \ s I STORM DRAINAGE EASEMENT ~ N PROPOSED T6 Foor woE Pueuc sTGRN wATER DRAINAGE EASEMENT. • , i , , ' • M '36.01'E _ - - _ _ J (SEE NOTE c ~ owNERnRP aF, AND RESPONSIBILITY FOR IMPROVEMENT AND NNNTENANCE
I ,00 ~ / PROP 1 ' = Z I 114 15,420 SF OSED s m G' ~ I LOT 17 , , /O~pF ~S~ITO/~RpM WATER FApLI11ES IN THIS EASEMENT REMNNS YA1H 7HE 1, (Q ¦ T • 2 I Y GRANTOR.
/ CITY STORM ~ + ~ ~ . I $ I a ni r3 . . 3 LOT 38 \ / 1 DRAINAGE EASEMENT I~,,• N ~ N I 22,002 SF ';'PROPOSED 32 S30'2033 E IF 7FIE PROPERTY Is WITHIN oR BECOMES A PARt OF THE aTY, ~t TIE EASEMENT AND ACCESS PO91T5 10 1HE EASEMENT ARE SUEI.ECT TO , ','qTY STQRId DRAINA 8 O 280,88' TIE TERMS AND RESTRIC710NS STALED IN THE 'REVISED DECURA110N OF
N I 1 N M I # 25 371 SF ~ \ PROPOSED 16 CITY ~ (SEE NOTE C • ~ R I \ ''EASEMENT ° \ - - - - - - - - - _ - RaHTS AND PRIVILEGES of THE aTY of DURHAM rI STORM wATER \ ' ~ ~ - - - - - 1 MANAGEMENT FACIUTf EASEMENTS" RECORDED RI REAL ESTATE BOOK 2296,
N I T M RAINA ~ I m m a ~ ~ s oR D GE ~ LOT 28 \ LOT 25 ~ I , ~ ~ I EASEMENT / \ I ~ EE NOTE D \ PAGE 206, M?NCM DOdiMENT IS INCORPORATED HERDN. THIS EASEMENT
y ~ \ SEE NOTE "D" . / ° W 17,487 SF 17,931 SF ~ - _ _ _ _ _ , , LOT 8 I 2: MID REND DECLARATION Do Nor CREATE THE o6uGAnaN ro PROr1oE \ , m PUBLIC MANTENANCE NO EX~DINGS, SiRUCTURES, F9.LS, EMBANKMENTS OR
,55 01 W ~ ~ \ / . ~ a ti PC • 13+97.94 ~ 7' I Na2 \ ~ \ / / NM ,W 8 \ 30,335 SF ~ ,3 OBSiRUC110115 PERMITTED WTFAN THE EASEMENT EXCEPT ACCORDING TO , , ~ m 7HOSf 7EIM1$,
/ LOT 28 a f \ \ / - , N ~o I PROPOSED ~ , , \ I , ' o N NOTE b' t~, , , PROPOSED 30 CITY I
~ - / N~ I ~ \ / 15,38 SF ,t ~ , N J CITY STORM STORM DRAINAGE EASEMENT ~ ~ FooT WoE PUEpJC STORM WATER DRNNAOE EA5EMa1T. I N1 \ 8Jg01 \ ~ ~ ~ owNERSHIP oF, AND RESPONS911UTY FOR IMPROVEMENT AND MNN7ENANCE
5 1 ~ ~ / ~ ' ~ . N~ DRAINAGE EAS M NT 425 ~ ~ V I I ~ ~ I E E 1 LOT 37 / / a~ 6 _ ~ 1 1 eEaN woereRC R LOT 18 :ASEMENT \ 4, \ (SEE NOTE D aF s7oRN NN7ER FACNJnES 9r THIS EASEMENT REMNNS WiH THE • \ ~ GRANTOR. ~ THE PROPERTY Is WiHM OR BEC011ES A PART aF 7HE an,
a2• / i . eo-o7 03 I I LOT 27 s sty; 1s+4a79 r / / ~ ~ R .460.00' I I I • cb-,o-zo \ 23,024 SF 23,813 SF ~ ~ - 1 aFFSEr taoo R l ~„v',' y • \ ~ . - THE EASEMENT AND ACCESS POINTS TO 1TE EASEMENT ARE SUB,ECT TO , ' ~ \ , . ' THE 1ERUS AND RESTRICTXINS STALED Ei 1HE 'RENSED DECURATKXr OF
/ / \ L -363.86' I I 18,482 SF I R 1es.1r / / / \ ~ . 44-o4-t I L - 264.90' 1 1 / C ,tio ~ RIGHTS AND PPoNIEGES OF T1E dTY OF DURHAM IN STORM WATER 8 ~~0 ~0~ ^ . ~ \ • MANAODEIIT FACILITY EASEMENTS" RECORDED 91 REV. ESTATE BOOK 2296,
/ / ~ I I ~ - 34-4z-o7 / , ~ I I ~ 1 1 / ~ o'' ~ ~ , . ' V: 111 \ N h PAGE 204 NFNCH DOCUMENT IS XiCORPORAtED HEREIN. THIS EASEMENT ?3, K' . , 99' AND REVISED DECLARATKXV DO NOT CREATE THE OBUGA710N TO PRONDE
I / / LOT 39 c ~ I I I ~ 1 1/ ~ y A ~J~I`F'+' O~ . , . 2~ PUBLIC MARIIENANCE NO EXAlDINOS, STRUCTURES, FNJ.S, EMBANKMENTS OR 1u~ 5 ~7~ A M . , . , OBSTRUCTgNS PERMITTED WTHIN THE EASEMENT EXCEPT ACCORDING TO 1~
1 ~ < / 23,321 SF / ~ ~ J n s~ t~s+"se~7 r • ~ I I W ~ / / / \ SSA ~ A ~ ~ ~ _ ~ OFFSET: 13.00 R ~ ~ \ ; \ 1 LOT 13 So F9 GB ~ \ FUTURE DEVELOPMENT THOSE 7ERMIS 17,927 SF A'~'~o \
~ ~ ~_4 - ~ ~~F 120,952 SF ~~~r \ \ PROPOSED 17 FOOT WDE PUBLIC STORM WA7ER DRNNAOE EASEMENL uu
~ / / \ \ ~ / LOT 15 ~ ~ CURVE 1 . , \ ONTIERSHIP aF, MO RESPONSIBILITY FOR IMPROVEMENT AND MNNIENNVCE I ¦ 48-26-33 ~ \ . , \ OF STORM WATER FACILI11E5 9i THIS EASEMENT REAINNS W1H THE
/ / / / LOT 40 \ ~ ao a ~ ~ I / / / / \ 20,520 SF ~ R ¦ 350.00' R \ \ , . . , , . THE A9EMENT MID ACCESS IPdN TO 1HE EASEMENT ARE SUB~CT TO ' L ¦ 293.92' / \ THE 1ERM3 AND RESTRICTIONS STALED IN THE ' N A
3 / PROPOSED 30 CITY OF / 18,522 SF / / CURVE 3 ~ ] ^ \ , I / / DURHAM SANITARY / 3e~ 17 1b ~ $ I - t8-19-37 / \ ti \ Dc ¦ 18-22-1 . , , . \ RE SED DECLAR RON OF RWHTS AND PRIV9EGES OF THE dTY OF DURHAM MV STORM WATER
c ro • R A MENT ~ / ~ ~ A ~ ~ ti R • tel.oo' / / \ ~ / ,~0„` \ \ MNVAOENEFIT FACILITY EASEMENTS' RECORDED MV REAL ESTATE BOON 2294 ~ / , \ PAGE 2O4 NNIfxI DOdJMENT IS RiCORPORATED HEREIN, THIS EASEMENT
N ~ I / SEWE ESE " / PROPOSED 16 CITY ~ `'m \ ,>•a ~ - sz9o' ~ I (SEE NOTE A STORM DRAINAGE ~ \ xti~ Dc - 31-38-18 ~ \ PROPOSED \ MO REVISED DECLARAnON DO Nor CREATE THE OBUOAiION TO PRONDE
t-, I LOT 38 EASEME ~ 1?a 'F' h / \ / CITY STORM ~ PUENJC MANTENMICE NO EXALdNOS, STRUCTURES, FlU.S, EMBANKMENTS OR \ DRAINAGE EASEMENT\ , , , , aEx7RUCTIDFIS PERM97TED WTHN THE EASEMENT EXf1:Pt ACCORDING To \ / \ ~ THOSE 7ERMS
~ / (SEE NOTE "D"). ~ ~ _ _ , ~ F ~ 0 \ I 22,205 SF ,a Q - , , ~ \ 4 / \ ~
~ ~ LOT 41 ~A - ~ ~ \ \ I z NOTE 'F'
13,188 SF '~1H[j PROPOSED ~ / 5 SIDEWALK n ? C / \ w ~ ALL LOTS To eE sERVTCED Err Pubuc 9EwER AND wA7ER, N
c65 / \ p / / LOT 14 I 1 ` ~'1?1 ~ / 4 \ / / cA 1 I m No7E •c' / ~ , , . , . ~ ' STREET NO d6VEMIAY 6MPACT TO AIPAAUW BUFFER SHALL REQUIRE
/ ~ / 20,248 SF I LOT 42 ~ / \ bs. / ~s~; I , I . APPROVU. FRGM K a DI~ION aF wA7ER auNm. / G
g / / \ A9 / / ~ • $ 14 387 SF LOT 43 '9s• w ,a d ~ ~ / \ / / T~' ~8~ dS . , . . , . I No7E 'H' ~ Q C~,~~ ~ , . . , FlNN. PUT AND OEEED DEDICATNC RIGHT OF WAY TO BE RECORDED PRIOR TO
~ r / 15,757 SF / / 4 / / LOT 44 \ ~ \ / ~ EP G 13 ~ I \ THE IS9IJANgE aF BIALDINO PERMIT. > ~ E y o I
e M \ ~ \ I , , NGOOT oRncI11AY PERMIT REaSRED PRIOR To caNSTnt,cr~a+.
/ 18,298 SF \ ~ 1'` cp ~ \ \ . , \PROPOSED NorE •,r
" " PROPOSED 30' bS ~ c~~ / ~ OPEN SPACE C / / , ~ G ~ ~ / CITY OF DURHAM \ y , , . , , ~iTY STORM LOT 1 SHALL NAVE NO DM'6iCT ACCESS TO OUETaS R0. ' / LOT 2 'ir \ . , . ,
~ G 38,741 SF / \ F SANITARY SEWER G \ ~ 15 , a \ gRAINAGE EASEMENT ,N, 21588 SF
EASEMENT " " ~ \ '~i• \ ~ / / a~ as , . 1 aTY ~ 110N aF THE s9xwMxs sHOwN aN THIS PLAN Is sdEMA1N;, A / / ~ \ . , , ~ DlIR11AM/OR NCDOT ENplOAdMYQIT PERMT IS REQINRED PPoOR TO I I
G SEE NOTE A , .h \ ~ ~ ~ \ / / \ , , , ' ' Io CONTACT 1111E do OF~NI rENGEEERr+c CONSTAU \\~I11111 I I11T~~~/ CRON \ / / ~ OFFICE AT 660-4326 FOR APRE-CONSTRUCTION CONFERENCE AND A FlEID ~ ~~~i
CURVE 2 G - i / PROPOSED 1 G oR rn ANY MnRK oN THE PRDPOSEn sIDEwALK. • , \ ~
I 10-00-47 / ~ ~ R • 181.00' / 1Ox ~'j, ~ / CITY STORM I . •,•y I ~ • \ I~ / ~ o NOTE 'L' ~ •'9 ; / DRAINAGE ~ . , , ' ~ Z LOT 1 AS PER DEED BOOK PAGE 673-6
L - 31.83 / ~ .yV ~ t~ ,11 G Dc - 31-39-18 / QG , OFFSET: 14.00 R S• ~ To " SEAL TAPER tii~ \ / / o, , . • y I ~ PERPE7UN. ooenNUrw 9CENC EASEIiENr. TILE PROPERTY WLL FaT BE - T3+32,tt ~ >s, % EASEMENT „ " AI ANY TRK F'OR ANYTHING OTHER THAN ONE s99xx,EE-FAME.Y RESDENnAi~ _ =
/ * ~ ET: 12.00 R ? / LOT 3 SEE NOTE C TAI I - >r ~ ~ DMElL11C Whl SUPPORTING OUTBIRLDINOS (sucH As A GARAGE aR PUMP 15456 ; ~9~ F Z ' I . , . I~ HOUSE, ETC.). NO MOBEE HOME CAN BE LocAtED aN LOT 1.
' PROPOSED 17' cl LOT 45 ~ ~ / / TY / dry, STORM DRAINAGE \ 15,011 SF / ~ ~ / \ 81,888 SF 6 'c y `
EASEMENT / / \ \ ~ ~ S
NOTE E ip\ ~ ~~Ni A+PER 7 \ ER \ ~o ~ ~I 1 ~ninl,lnr 16,37 \ \ ~~<n ~ y.'.'.','."
\ / ~ ~ ~ / OFFSET: 700 R PROPOSED ~ ,,ti'}l \ 1,OOR \ \ iI '~0' \ 1
5' SIDEWALK / \ \ ~ ~ 9 G ~I , , ~ ti~ OPEN SPACE CALCULATION
l 4c PROPO D ~ ~ ,cP \ ~ \ .y . PROPOSED OPEN SPACE m
r I SIDEWA ~ ~y~~ 00 \ ~~P ~+~y , , , LOT AR A R IR SF \ Ga ~ I G . \
\ Fq ' \ 11 1 4 1 ti I 12 1 7
(A +Pp C ~ F '~;I 'y 13 17 7 7 ~r / \
A U ~ G a p LOT 1 LOT 1 \ 16 17 6 7 a~ \ ~ k 19 17 4 7
I S ~ 108 788 S 108,788 SF ti, \ ?'ss, 20 17 1 71
! I ~ ~d o \ o~ \ 9~t ?,p 22 17 4 0
A ~ \ \ F \ 23 1 4 0 F \ ~ \ 24 1 4 1 0.
\ +~0 \ X10 x 70 PROPOSED
SIGHT CITY STORM \ ~ 26 ~ ~ \ 1~. \ 17 7 1 Z o
TRIANGLE ~ ~ DRAINAGE EASEMENT ~ (TYP.) \ \ 27 1 1 \ \ 28 1 0 4
J
~ \ ~ \ 30 1 74 - \ \ 31 i 4 1
f~ ~ \ \ \ ~ W \ \ c~ ap 40 1 478 ~
\~o. ~ , \a \10, \ 41 1 1 1
~ \G, \ BG~ \ 42 14 7 1
/ sp. ~ s S, \ 43 1 7 7 4 4 F 0 \ NC 44 1 7 0 S~ \ Se` / n~ P, 45 15 011 4
G"q \ ~ J ry0p•
~O• Fq, s~ '~i ~ qp _ _ _ - ~ TOTAL OPEN SPACE REQUIRED: 79,407 SF (1,82 AC,) o:
Fq eG . - - - PROPOSED OPEN SPACE: 115,969 SF (2.86 AC.) m ~
~ \ z
~G \ PROPOSED IMPERVOUS SURFACE GAL OLILA710NS~ DATE: 4109102
295.7r \ IMPERNOUS SURFACE MAY NOT EXCEED 24>< Of LOT AREA.
\ SITE AREA: 1,200,897 SF JOB NO. 00208 CURVE TABLE MAX, IMPERVIOUS SURFACE ALLOWED: 288,187 SF
CURVE TABLE CURVE LENGTH RADIUS CHORD DIRECTION CHORD ROADS: 75,794 SF DRAWING: QO-208-04 SIDEWALKS: 10,190 SF
UNE TABLE UNE BEARING LENGTH CURVE TABLE CURVE LENGTH RADIUS CHORD DIRECTION CHORD C43 33.41 25.00 11 1'57"E 30.97 PUMP STA710N: 7,717 SF DESIGNED: ~WP
L1 CURVE LENGTH RADIUS CHORD DIREC11ON CHO C21 21.36 170.00 7'4 ' 1"W 21,37 C44 82.98 1028.18 'S5" 82.94 TOTAL MAX. IMPERVIOUS SURFACE ALLOWED FOR LOTS: 194,466 SF ~ DIREC710N CHORD C22 81,78 170,00 'W 80,98 C45 9&50 190.11 N 9 ' "W 97,40 AVERAGE MAX. IMPERVIOUS SURFACE ALLOWED PER LOT: 4,522 SF DRAWN: LMH
~ C1 281.88 978.18 S17'47'4 "W 281, 1'47'4 "W 281,08 C23 80.00 170.00 S1 "W 59.89 Cox 114.50 1028,16 11'10'41" 114,44 MAX. IMPERVIOUS SURFACE ALLOWED PER LOT: 4,500 SF
~ C2 8.35 370.00 N7 '3 ' 'W B. L4 ' C3 88.09 370.00 N7 7 ' 'W 88. '3 ' 'W 8,35 C24 83.47 170.00 7 '47" 63,10 C47 131,33 1028.18 1 131.24 MAX. IMPERVIOUS SURFACE FOR LOT 3: 11,217 SF CHECKED:
f C4 182.88 370.00 T 'W 181. 7 ' 'W 88,00 C25 18.18 170.00 7.44' 16,17 C48 97,70 285,00 N1 ' '23"W 97.22 HORIZONTAL SCALE: 7' 'W 161,57 C28 23.18 25.00 N '1 " 22.36 C49 81,30 1028.18 '0 81.29 1" = 60'
L8 C5 83.61 370.00 83. 1 L7 ' 63,53 C27 71,94 50.00 65.89 C50 81.00 1054.14 "17'10 80.99
LS " C8 23.18 25.00 N 'I ' 1" 22. 'I ' 1" 22.38 C28 85.71 50.00 N7 81,08 C51 97,17 285,00 N '51` 98.70 SYMBOL LEGEND VERTICAL SCALE: 7' 50.50 C29 59.88 50.00 N '1 " 58.37 C52 13,75 1054,14 S24'1 '0 ' 13.75 NA
L9 " C7 52.94 50.00 7' 50. CB 83.00 50.00 1 '44' 58 '44' 58.91 C30 37,28 50.00 7 ' 1"W 38.42 C53 50,00 285,00 N '44'28" 49,94
L10 Y. M R1 M RflM r~nti•/4 a"r t0 ~n., ~4 a"r iC ne Pit ei 1Y 9RM n~~nn.l+,n"r nnm nee e: to nee nn ..~..~~I~~"- a",w . C2 LICCT AIr1
Lll ' * 'f' 1 " C10 48,08 50.00 N7 46. -ap If 1 r+.va w. &w- .-.w i Ju r- ca.w w+ aa,-Jo 90,j.w Na4U/ 00 L .7d..A! M LAIWINto UUIYUKLIL MUNUMLNI VI ILL 1 IVV. 46.25 C32 134.36 235.00 N '44" 132.53 C55 148.64 1912.51 • '41' 14&80 QQ EXISTING IRON PIN
L 2 L13 Cil 34.79 50.00 N 7' 34. ' 5*27*35*E 34.09 C33 133.13 235.00 N 9 ' "W 131,36 C56 74.73 285.00 N4 74.52
L14 S20*27'36*E 34,09' C12 23.18 25.00 22. ' 22,36 C34 105.46 140.11 N4 1' "W 102.99 C57 25.54 285.00 N 7 '23" 25.54 Q IRON PIN SET
L15 C13 146.24 330.00 7 1' 145.1 L16 SOB*05'13"W 10,00' C14 132.77 330.00 N •W 131. 1' 145,04 C35 140.59 145.11 7' 7"W 135.16 C58 61.11 235.00 N 92'27" 60.94 1*25*34OW 131,88 C36 172,31 130.00 S17*30'40*W 159.97 C62 261.86 976.18 7'47'45"W 261,08
L17 N30-29-33-W 50,00' C15 39.27 25.00 N "W 35. "W 35.36 C37 15.34 158.00 S1 4'1 "W 15,34 C63 72.63 1004,14 44rW '17` 72.61
L18 C16 36.00 206.00 1 "W 35.1. L19 7 ' C17 49.90 156.00 N17*1 ' 1" 49. 'W 35.95 C38 41,18 25.00 4' "W 36.68 C64 11.89 370.00 11.89 SCALE 160' 79 ' 1" 49.69 C39 541,48 976.18 1'18" 534,57 C85 110,04 1982 51 ' 1' 110.02
L20 N30*35'40*W 20,25' C18 33.26 25.00 4' 1'4 " 30- 4' 1'4 " 30.86 C40 93.09 1026.18 04' '30"W 93.06 C66 93,43 1912.51 ' 7" 93.42 60' 0 60' 120'
L22 C19 6136 185.11 " 63.1 L23 S59*56*W*W 15,00' C20 70.00 185.11 7 '1 ' 4"W 69. 63.05 C41 94,18 1026.16 SO '4 '11" 94,15 C67 60.89 976.16 60.88 OF 23
II 2'04"W 69.58 C42 65,89 206.00 N17*1' *E 1 65.61 C68 13.35 130,00 "W 13,35

i \ z
Oi \ 5 O
I ? U
\ ~ ~
00 U7 OPEN SPACE B \ w o: 1 z ~
-Z 1
~ LOT 10 Z ~ 1 w U M
LOT 33 ~ ~ ~
LOT 32 LOT 21 a \ ~ o
~ 1 W a r
1 ~ma
LOT 20 1 ~ N
e LOT 9 ~ 1 ~ - N ~ ~ LOT 11 ~ m ~
LOT 22 1 1 0 ~ 0 JOR 1 ~ Z ~ U
PE ANENT MINOR RSION, 1 ~ c LlJ Q = 3
ICAL. SEE DETAIL, DETAIL. 1 w ~ ~ " ~ ~=P o 1 36g v
a LOT 19 N ~ a.~^ .0
LOT 31 N 1 I ~ ~ D s U 0 ~ 1 I ~ ? U m11'
LOT 34 ~ ~ 1 I a _Z oJU
= Z o~0 I I U Q
I LOT 8 Q
e~ I
1
LOT 23 1
LOT 18 \ LOT 12 I )T 18 \
LOT 35 LOT 30 1 DE1EN110N 1
.LOT 24 1 14 \ 31 ~ 9 _
~ ~i i~ ~ ~
351 w \
LOT 7 , 55
19 s,
t5 \ P \
9 ` ~ 3 1
LOT 29 13 ~ ~
LOT 36 s LOT 1"
LOT 17 ~ ",AND ICI
~ LOT 25 ~ a 1
1 LOT 6 1
a+ e ~ 4~i.~ a 1
/1 ~ \ \ ~
\ ~ PERMANENT MEDIUM 1 \ ~ f DIVERSION,
® LOT 37 ~ LOT 28 L09 LOT 16 ~ 2 9~ ~ww ~ ~ TYPICAL, SEE DETAIL,
wnroweu,s No \
LOT 27 9 ~ LOT 26 OE1Q1110N ~ ~ \
w 4 ~
3 ~8 J N \
SS \ ~ FUTURE
1 \ DEVELOPMENT
LOT 13 + ~ \
4 LOT 39 e \ \
LOT 15 LOT 40 LOT 15 \ \ ~ \
5 \ OElEN110N 3 t' 1
\ ~
\ LOT 41 } 3A, - I
\ \ ' ~ 9 LOT 14 ss a,
\ 4 ''t
S$ ~ 5' \ LOT 42
LOT 43 ~
6 \ \ M 55 s S ~ \
\ \ ~ ~ ~ ~ \
~J"
\ ,p / ,
~ a°j 1 ~ s \ 4 W
~ ~ LOT 44 ~ ~ \ I w W y ~ 1 W ~ ~
\
STORM DRAINAGE STRUCTURES TABLE w LOT 2 \ 1 1 1 4 5 ~ ,
STRUCTURE TOP INV. IN INV. OUT REMARKS u~ ~ CI 1 397,30 390,30 N W 1 I 1
~.w CI 2 397,30 390.10 S 389.90 NE 'ss `~S` LOT 45 1 s~ 1 1 1
CI 3 391,80 385.0 S 384.80 SE ~ 1 i I
'~s CI 4 391,80 384.60 N 379.00 SE STORM DRAINAGE PIPE TABLE 1 1 1 e
JB 5 388.00 373.50 N 373.30 SE " " " FROM TO DIA, AT, LENGTH SLOPE y~ FES 6 371.00 CLASS B RIPRAP APRON - 12 Lx6 Wx8 TH CI 1 1 " W w ~ ~ 1 1 1
CI 2 5 RCP 21 1.OX A W 5 1 Is + 1 3; ~ LOT 3 ~
p 1 C CI 2 CI 3 15 RCP 167 2.9X ~h a CI7 382.00 374.40 CI3 4 ~
CI 8 382,00 374,20E 374,00 N CI 15" RCP 21 ~ 1,OX ss"~ CI 4 JB 5 15 RCP 55 10,OX w ~ ~ I r 1
CI 9 377,00 369.60 SE 369.40 NW JB 5 ' ~ ~ m
CI 10 375,00 367.70 S FES 6 15 RCP 83 2.8% \ a y CI 11 375,00 367.50 N 367,30 W CI 7 " \ ~ 4 1 1
367.50 SE CI 8 15 RCP 21 1,oX by 1 1
CI 8 CI 9 t5" RCP 96' 4.6X y FES 12 370.00 CI 9 ' 1 ~ ~ \ ~y 1
CI 13 376,00 366.70E 366.50 N CI 11 15 RCP 78 2,4X CI 10 CI 11 15" RCP 21' 1,OX 1
367,50 S CI 11 CI 13 15" RCP 62' 1.OX 1
YI 14 364,00 360.20E FES 12 ti YI 15 363,00 358,30 358.10 E CI 13 18 RCP 25 10.OX h o
CI 13 YI 15 24" RCP 130' 6.3X 358, 30 S LOT 1 \ a ~ ~
YI 14 YI 15 15" RCP 33' 5.8X YI16 367,00 356,80 356.60 " , / ~ U 3S i (n to
11 15 YI 16 24 RCP 63 2.1 X pg~ FES 17 356.00 CLASS "B" RIPRAP APRON - t2'Lx6'Wx14"TH ~ 16 " ~ \ OETEN110N 4 ~ A w 6 : ~ f-. i ~ ~ Z O
RISER 18 360,00 355.90 FES 17 24 RCP 62~ 1.OX w ~~9 6 FES 19 355.00 CLASS "A" RIPRAP APRON - 6'Lx5'Wx6"TH RISER 18 FES 19 15 RCP 89 1,oX ~
~A r ~ vA - ~ -
I CI 20 CI 21 15" RCP 21' 1,OX r C 20 360.90 354,0 SE CI 21 " , ^ ~ ~ 1 W
CI 21 360.90 353,80 N 353.60E CI 22 15" RCP 31 1,3X CI 22 CI 24 15 RCP 162 3.2X DG 4 \
CI 22 358.20 353,40 W 353.20 SE " , FES 23 CI 24 30 RCP 35 2.OX PRES ,339', \ ..r
FES 23 347,00 CI 24 ' CI 24 352.90 346,10 NW 346.00 NE CI 25 30 RCP 29 1,oX YS. r \ w \ ~ ~
CI 25 FES 26 30" RCP 60' 1,OX 346,30 S YI 27 FES 28 15" RCP 45' LOX 9 s, ~ ; o
CI 25 352.90 344,70 SW 339.60 N PIPE 28 ' V
FES 26 339.00 CLASS "B" RIPRAP APRON - 18'Lx8'Wx14"TH FES 30 15 RCP 38 1,OX \ w ~ m
1127 354.50 339.50 " , YI 31 FES 32 15 RCP 35 1.oX
FES 28 339.00 CLASS "A" RIPRAP APRON - 6'Lx5'Wx6"TH " , PIPE 33 FES 34 15 RCP 45 1.oX PIPE 29 338.50 \ ~ \ Z
FES 30 338.10 CLASS "A" RIPRAP APRON - 6'Lx5'Wx6"TH , \ € ~ DATE: 4109!02
DOUBLE CI 35 CI 36 15 RCP 21 1.OX ~ CI 36 FES 37 15" RCP 85' 1.OX (,.,1 ` JOB N0:
11 3t 356.50 351.30 N FES 38 ' \ 00208 \
FES 32 351.00 CLASS "A" RIPRAP APRON - 6'Lx5'Wx6"TH YI 39 15 RCP 76 10.2X PIPE 33 ~ 39 FES 40 15" RCP 49' 1.OX ~ DRAWING: \ 00-208-04
350,40 PIPE 41 FES 42 15" RCP 46' 1.OX ~ ~ FES 34 349,90 CLASS "A" RIPRAP APRON - 6'Lx5'Wx6"TH DESIGNED: SJB
. DRAWN: LMHISJB
YI 43 FES 44 15" RCP 24' 1.OX DOUBLE CI 35 349.50 340,00 N PIPE 45 ' v
CI 36 349.50 339,80 S 337,90E FES 46 15 RCP 67 1,OX CHECKED:
FES 37 337.00 CLASS "A" RIPRAP APRON - 6'Lx5'Wx6"TH FES 47 ' FES 48 54 RCP 54 0.30X HOR120NTAL SCALE:
FES 38 347.00 1"=60'
Y~ 39 341,00 339.20 SE 337.50 w HEADWALLS AND WIN WA N T VERTICAL SCALE: NA
FES 4a " "RIPRAP APR N - ' x 'Wx "TH G LLS ~ E. 337.00 CLASS A 0 6 L 5 6
PIPE 41 336.40 THESE PLANS SHOW THE PROPOSED CROSSING OF A NEUSE RIPARIAN STREAM AND BUFFER SHEET N0.
FES 42 336.00 CLASS "A" RIPRAP APRON - 6'Lx5'Wx6"TH FOR BLACKSTONE DRIVE, IN ORDER TO AVOID COSTLY MITIGATIONS, IT IS NECESSARY
IU LIMII UISIUKUANUL Uh IHt AhUKLMLNIIONLU 51KLAM BUFFER TO WHAT 15 SHOWN
THIS REQUIRES THAT TALLER HEADWALLS (12' INVERT-TOP), AND LONGER 30 DEGREE 11 43 340.00 337.30 NE WINGWALLS (20' MAX.) MUST BE CONSTRUCTED. THERE ARE NO KNOWN STANDARD DETAILS
FES 44 337.00 CLASS "A" RIPRAP APRON - 6'Lx5'Wx6"TH FOR THIS APPLICATION. IT WILL BE NECESSARY FOR THE DEVELOPER TO HIRE A
PIPE 45 336.60 STRUCTURAL ENGINEER TO DESIGN CONSTRUCTION DETAILS OF THESE HEADWALLS AND SCALE 1" = 60'
FES 46 336.00 CLASS "A" RIPRAP APRON - 6'Lx5'Wx6"TH WINGWALLS, CUSTOMIZED TO FIT THE SITUATION. THESE DETAILS MUST BE DESIGNED AND SUBMITTED TO CITY OF DURHAM ENGINEERING AND STORMWATER FOR APPROVAL 60' 0 60' 120'
FES 47 336.10 CONCRETE CHANNEL - SEE DETAIL. PRIOR TO BEGINNING ANY CONSTRUCTION. A RAILING MUST BE INSTALLED AT THE TOP
OF THE WALLS. SEE RAILING DETAIL. FES 48 335.90 CLASS "B" RIPRAP APRON - 27'Lx14'Wx12"TH OF 23

, I -r- 1 z
~ _ / i - 1
;f x199.0 398 ~ ' ~ - j z
\ ~ ~ ~ ,;a \ 1 w
~ OPEN ~°ACE B _ ~ ~ ~T~ a1 1 WIDE STORM ~ ~ CTS .A 1 ~ 1 ~ \ 1 1 Z c~ ,11
D AINAGE ESMT. ~ ~ `Is 7 \ ~ ~ U ~ I` ~ \ 9~ LOT 10 p •o
~ ~ 1 1 ~ z ~ I 1 1 A. ~ a ~
LOT 33 ~ ~ \ LOT 21 ~ LOT 32 a ~ 1 \ W~ ~ ~4 \ 1 `1 \ \ \ 1t ~ i ~
u ;a ~ \ t t 1 1 ~ O 1 1 / 1 LLB
A i \ ` 7. ` I / ~ ~ ~ H { ~ ~ I ~ ~ / ~ x
•l ~ s \ f ~ / ~ ~aoQ v i 1 , ~ 1 I I ~ ~ LOT/9 / + . \ I 32 WIDE S RM ~ ~ ~ ~ / w ~
- MINOR DIVERSION ~ ~ s DRAINAGE E 't t ~ > N ~ I ~ LOT 11 ~ ~ ~ ~
j,~' e`~,, DITCH.. SEE DETAIL. LOT 22 I ~ v 1 \ 1 1 ti L... o U~ o
LOT 20 a ~ A ~~.I, 16 WIDE S Rf;~ ~ U ~ \ ~ i I I 'y rw-?N y ~ ~ ~ / DRAINAGE E T,.• m c
f I ~ ti 16 WIDE STOR I ~ W Q= I ~ \ I \ DRAINAGE ESMT. / J w ~ (7 ~ 3 a i ` 1 366 ~ ~ 0
r ~ 16 IMDE STORM , DRAINAGE ESMT. WgDE STORM \ I ~ I ~ ~ ~ ~ P 11NAGE ESMT. ; ~ ~ ~ \ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 0 ~
~ J l.Hr ~ LOT 31 cs ° I ~ ~ ~ I .0 3 I ti ~ o' 0 \ I _yr--•_'~ 6 I U 0 ~ N
LOT 34 ~ LOT 19 f ~ rn c' I 1 ~ "f~E W Z U m w v~ LOT 19 ~ ~ I I J - U I I~ I ~ 1 ~ z a~-
M 1 I ~ 1 I ~ z z ~~o ~I I"; I ~ I U ° z>
~ ~ ~ 0 I MINOR DIVERSION 6 0 I I I LOT 8 ~ a
\ ~ 1' G I DITCH. SEE DETAIL r' J ~ Q I, I I I
~ \ 16' WIDE STORM eA DRAINAGE ESMT. ~ ~ ~ I ; I ~ > I, 1 I I
/ r i I I ~ 1
\ 23 $ LOT ~'•r I ~ I I I LOT 12 ~ r~ I 1 V ,
\ _ LOT ,..tA I ~ ~ ~ AQ D T N110N 1 I , LOT 18 I ; \ E E _
LOT 35 \ LOT 30 ` \ \ ~;"3?1 ~ 1 ! 1 ~
~ v v ~ ~ ~ LOT 24 \ ~ ,c,y' e ~ ~ V ' ~ f~ A• CONCRETE \ 350 ~t \ ~ ~ ` MONUMENT
~ ~ • S \ _ ~5 w u ~ ` ~ _ "`EtEV:- 370,65,%'
a T ~ ~ ~ V~ w1 LOT 7~~ i a ~~4' _ ~ \ 55 . ;
d , , 1' ~ 3 ~ ~ N aR, WIDTH ~ \ ~ \ STORM
~ ~ 15 \ A `"'~ti, A~ DRAINAGE ES
- w - -..c-= = \ \ 1 \ ~ ~ `
~s LOT 29 13 ~
~ ~ ~ ~4 , \ ~ SEE H I uu LOT 17 SAND WINGWALLS I s~e.a
LOT 36 s '°j, is ~ I \ [jETAILS. \ , \
~ LOT 25 \ - ~.y \
``VAR, WIDTH STORM - \ ~ J, °j ~s 1 . 1 r-~
DRAINAGE ESMT, ~ . t~ ~ \ ` \ ° ~ \ LOT 6
\ , ? ~ EE~DE~AIL- as ` \ 4 ~ ' p e NCRETE•,~C~ANN L ~ e p ` \
~ ~ \ HEADWALL 4 . a ti ~
\ ' LOT 37 's\ VAR,' WIDTH STORM © R LOT 28 ~ DRA AGE. ESMT, ~s ~s \ ~ ~ \ \ ` \
~A ~ \ LOT 16 ~ tt ~ SEE HEAD ALL \ ,1 \ DETENTION - ° 2 1AND WING MEDIUM DIVERSION D •
LOT 27 ? ` DETAILS, SEE DETAI 4 1 B 15 \ ~ 1' 8 A ~
~ \ LOT 26 \ ~ 6a \
~ / f \ V \ ,
~ ~ / MINOR DIVERSION 1 \ \ p ° . CH. SEE DETAIL. ~ / ss \ \ \
~ ~ / f 3z' w~oE sroRM 1 \ \ \ FUTURE .
W ~ J ~ ~ l / DRAIN.acE EsMT, ~ '`DEVELOPMENT \ ~ L T 13 \ \ \
LOT 40 8 R H STORM ~ ~ \ , AiNA ESMT, ~ ~ \
-LOT 39 ` i/ W LOT 15 ~ ~ \ \ ~1 ` \ ~
16' WIDE STORM ~ ~ ~ DRAINAGE ESMT: ~Q W , ca ~
5 y ~ W W ' DETENTION \ / \ \ \ fa,
^0 \ ( ~ \
~ ~ SS I S ~ \ ~ VAR, W1DTF~ ~ 16~ NODE STORM ,t ~ STORM DRAINAGE I \ GE ESMT•
LOT 41 e ~ 1 ~ ^ ~ i Ss \ ESMT. DRAINA LOT 1 \ 4, ?
~ 1 1 ~ } w I . I
~ / 1 r 4 ' R" ~ ~ I I
.S ~ ~ ~ LOT 42 LOT 4.3 ^ ~ ~ I \ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 4ao / ? i I ~ ~ DETENTION 2 !
i ~ _ _rw ~y~e? / ~ 1\ ~ , SS S ! I ~ I , ~
6 \ ~ ~
_ ~ ~ i \ \ \ ~ \ 4 0
SS / ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ f ~ \ l ~ - 16 WIDE STORM / / ~ \ 1 \ ,
- - t ~ s S \ \ EMI DIVERSION DI CN, i' ~a ~ , DRAINAGE. E MT. , \,s \ / TA .t \ ~ I 44 \ SEE DE V
G ~ ` G _ - ~ - - - ~ sc ~ LOT 44 N 5~ 6 I I N \ ~ w
~ ~ ~ 5 MINOR DVERSO ~ A ICI o ~ V A , ~ s DITCH. SEE DETAIL. ~ {y ~ ~ ae
- - - - .VAR. ~ ` ~+ss ~ \ i~.ir i \ :I I l ' 11 h + 1:: to LOT 2 ~ ~ of w 4 ? y 0,
~ 1.,,, DRAINAGE-°ES ~ STORM DRAINAGE STRUCTURES TABLE _ ` ~ \ w ~ ~ i 1 ~'41 t I ' ~ 8 ~ e~ m v
STRUCTURE TOP INV. IN INV. OUT REMARKS ! _ ~ \ ` r L... ~ t 1 1 u ~
DOUBLE CI 1 397.30 3 0.30 N ~ ~`~S > ~ SS LOT- 45 ' ~ i ~ VAR, WID STORM ~ ~ OT 45 I ~ 11 ~ ~ ~ DRAINAGE ESMT• u ' r:, y'' h t.
CI 2 7. 0 9 .10 S 389.90 NE ~~,.v \ ~ \ ~G, ~ • ; 39 3 3 0 ~ t ~s ~ 4 ~ 1'~ I i ~ ~ t, I~ (Mf~Yo2
CI 3 _ w ~ ~ ~ ass ' h~ r~ 391.80 385.0 S 384.80 SE ~ ~ ~ t-.., ~ I i 16 WIDE STORM ~ ~
CI4 391,80 384.60 NW 379.00 SE ~ F~`~ ~ ~ ,~W JB 5 388.00 373.50 NW 373.30 SE STORM DRAINAGE PIPE TABLE r ~ ~ ~ ~ a~ y~' ~ DRAINAGE ESMT. ~ ~ I _ 4s ~ ~ 1 ,1 \
W F ~ s FES 6 371.00 CLASS "B" RIPRAP APRON - 12'Lx6'Wx8"TH FROM TO DIA. AT. LENGTH ~ ~ ~ 'r~'s SLOPE Ra ~ ' LOT 3 / / ~ ~ 33 y ~ \ t~ } ~ 1 1 ! I
DOUBLE CI 1 " ` ~ \ qo ~ ~ CI 2 15" RCP 23 1.0% . ~ ~ s~ ~ a ~ \ MINOR IVERSION / ~ ~ ; ~ r~ ' ~ / ~ S. DITCH. E DETAIL / I I ~
CI 7 382.00 374.40 W CI 2 CI 3 15 RCP 177 2.8% w ~ \ MINOR DIVERSION DITCH• ~ / ~ ~
CI 8 382.00 374.20E 374.00 NW CI 3 CI 4 15" RCP 23' 1.0% ~RF~ \ ~ ~ \ EE DETAIL / ~ ` i / ~ ~1 1 1 ~ m
377.14 369.60 SE 369.40 NW CI 4 ~ R ~ JB 5 15 RCP 55 10.0% FRs~ oqo \ \ CI 10 375.75 367,78 S JB 5 1 ` ' 'y\ VAR, WIT TQ ~ / ~ / ~ ;1 ti 1 / ( ~ t \
FES 6 5 RCP 83 2.8% ~ ~ W RAINAG ` ~ r CI 11 375.75 367.54 N 367.44 W \ ~ \ 1 \
" ~ ~ ~y~ p,, 367.54 SE CI 7 CI 8 15 RCP 23 1.0% ~t 5~ / \ ~ A I 4
FE5 t2 370.00 CI 8 I 1 " P C 9 5 RC 96 4.6% , ~ , ~ ~ LOT 1 I 1 ~
CI t3 376.91 366.70 E 366.50 N CI 9 CI 11 15" RCP 78' 2.4% 'i, ly-•., ' ~ / " 1 ~ ?n ~ a Y ~ ~ ~ I MINOR VERSION DITCH• ' \ l ' ~ }M`t
367.50 S CI 1O CI 11 15 RCP 21 1.0% ~ 5 YI 14 364.00 360.20 E CI 11 1 ~ \ CI 13 18 RCP 62 1,0% ~ a ~ SEE DET ~ ~ z I` x,16 WIDE STORM ~ I ~ p g ~ ~ m ;.a~ \ .
YI 15 6. W 1 1 ~ \ 3 3 00 358.30 358.0 E FES 2 CI 13 18 RCP 25 10.0% 3 ` DRALNAGE ESMT. ~ ) t'~~ t, H - DETEN ~ ~ ' \ \
358.30 S CI 13 11 15 24" RCP 130' 6.3% i 5 3^6 ~ ~ \ 1 ~ aw \ ~ ~ ._3 _ ~ I ~ w
367.00 356.80 356.60 YI 14 YI 15 15" RCP 33 5.8% M W M w \ ~ ~ i \ Z o
FES 17 356.00 CLASS "B" RIPRAP APRON - 12'Lx6'Wx14"TH YI 15 11 i6 24" RCP 63' 2.1% rn RISER 18 T I T ~ \ ~ 360 00 355.90 SEE POND DE A LS SHEE . 11 16 FES 17 30 RCP 62 1.0% \ ~ ~ \ ~
FES 19 3 5.00 CLASS "A" RIPRAP APRON - 6'Lx5'Wx6"TH RISER 18 FES 19 15"RCP 89' 1,0% \ ~ \ 34 VAR. WIDTH STORM t \ \ \ r,,
~ \ `A n DRAINAGE ESMT. ~
CI 20 REMOVE EX. \ ~ 360.90 354,0 SE CI 20 CI 21 15 RCP 21 1.0% RM PIPES \ W \ \ A~
CI 21 360.90 353.80 NW 353.60 E CI 21 CI 22 15" RCP 31' 1.3% U R DRIVEWA A 33 \ , to / t
CI 22 356.20 353.40 W 353.20 SE CI 22 CI 24 15" RCP 162' 4.4% a 1`r, \ FES 23 347,00 FES 23 CI 24 36" RCP 35' 2,0% ~ ~ ~ \ - \ r
CI 24 353.02 346.10 NW 345,87 NE CI 24 CI 25 36" RCP 29' 1.0% ~ ~ il 4 ~ \ \ a
346.30 SW CI 25 FES 26 36" RCP 60' 1.0% \ \ \ \ ~
CI 25 353.02 345.58 SW 339.50 N YI 27 FES 28 t5" RCP 45' 1.0% \
FES 26 339.00 CLASS "B" RIPRAP APRON - 18'Lx8'Wx14"TH PIPE 29 FES 30 15" RCP 36' 1.0% \ \ \ ~ \ \ \ ~
~ 27 354.50 339.5 FES 28 339.00 CLASS "A" RIPRAP APRON - 6'Lx5'Wx6"TH YI 31 FES 32 15" RCP 18' 1.0% \ \ \ z
PIPE 29 338,50 SEE POND DETAILS SHEET. PIP \ E 33 FES 34 15 RCP 40 1.0% ~ \ \ kY`'a \ \ \ DATE: ,4 \ ~ \ ~ 4ro9ro2
FES 30 338.10 CLASS "A" RIPRAP APRON - 6'Lx5'Wx6"TH ~ , \ \ \ JOB NO:
DOUBLE CI 35 CI 36 18" RCP 21' 1 NOTES .0% \ \ \ 00208
YI 31 356.50 351.20 N CI 36 FES 37 t8" RCP 85' 1.0% NOTE "A" \ FES 32 351.00 CLASS "A" RIPRAP APRON - 6'Lx5'Wx6"TH FES 38 " ~ A STORM WATER FACILITY OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE PERMIT AGREEMENT, \ VAR. WIDTH'STOR \ DRAWING: \ \ \ 00-208-04 DRAINAGE ESMT,
YI 39 15 RCP 76 10.2% STORM WATER FACILITY PERMIT FEE >~2,000 PER DETENTION POND WATER PIPE 33 350.40 SEE POND DETAILS SHEET. YI 39 FES 40 18" RCP 49' 1.0% ( / ~ \ DESIGNED: gJB
FES 34 350.00 CLASS "A" RIPRAP APRON - 6'Lx5'Wx6"TH PIPE 41 FES 42 15" RCP 4 ' QUALITY POND/DEVICE), AND PERPETUAL SURETY FOR THE CONTINUOUS ~ 6 1.0% OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE OF THE FACILITY (BASED ON FINAL DESIGN OF ~ DRAWN:
LMHISJB
DOUBLE CI 35 350.18 340.00 N YI 43 POND/DEVICE) IS REQUIRED PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION PLAN APPROVAL FOR ALL FES 44 24 RCP 24 1.0% STORM WATER CONTROL FACILITIES. AN AS-BUILT CERTIFICATION PROVIDED BY CHECKED:
CI 36 350.18 339.80 S 337.90 E PIPE 45 FES 46 15" RCP 67' 1.0% THE DESIGN ENGINEER IS REQUIRED PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF A CERTIFICATE OF FES 37 337.00 CLASS "A" RIPRAP APRON - 6'Lx5'Wx6"TH OCCUPANCY FOR ANY STORM WATER FACILITY CONSTRUCTED. HORIZONTAL SCALE;
HW 47 HW 48 54" RCP 54' 0,31% „ „ 1"=60'
FES 38 347.00 NOTE B VERTICAL SCALE: NA
11 39 342,00 339.20 SE 337.50 W THE EXISTING NEUSE RIPARIAN STREAM BUFFER IS NOT TO BE DISTURBED, WITH
FES 40 337.00 CLASS "A" RIPRAP APRON - 6'Lx5'Wx6"TN THE EXCEPTION OF 149 UNEAR FEET (14,343 SO. FT.) OF DISTURBANCE AT THE STREAM CROSSING FOR BLACKSTONE DRIVE. THIS AREA IS TO BE PIPE 41 336.40 SEE POND DETAILS SHEET. REVEGETATED ACCORDING TO THE "REVEGETATION PLAN," SHEET N0.
FES 42 336.00 CLASS "A" RIPRAP APRON - 6'Lx5'Wx6"TH
YI 43 342.00 337.30 NE
FES 44 337.00 CLASS "A" RIPRAP APRON - 6'Lx5'Wx6"TH PIPE 45 336.60 SEE POND DETAILS SHEET. SCALE 1" = 60'
FES 46 336.00 CLASS "A" RIPRAP APRON - 6'Lx5'Wx6"TH
60' 0 60' 120'
HW 47 336.10 CONCRETE CHANNEL - SEE DETAIL. OF 24
HW 48 335.90 CLASS "B" RIPRAP APRON - 27'Lx14'Wx12"TH

Z
U ~ Z_
. Project: ~ U
Project:,,,,. ?roject: Project No. ] Project No. w ~ w ~
$y: Z vii .o 3 Checked BY~ Checked - Z ~
CALLEMYN•PARKER Y~ CALIEMYN~Pl~2KER U Z ~
I ~a, wae,~e•,aaax * Date: w U N Sheet of Aate: ?-G v Sheet ? of ! ~ )ate
o ~
# w
VARIABLE /1 ~ ~ x ~i ~ ~ cn oo Q
~ ~ W N ~
6.0 max:- , ~ , * ~ ~d ~ l'1. Q~Cr 'T~p ~ > ~ ~~G?~aM ~ -Nm
' o ~ ~ N~ ~ !I Z ~ ~
b:. _ ~ ~q w~Hcr~ To E Q" LL! Q z M c

2' ~ ~ ~ ~ w ~ ~ q @.a ~ a ~ .o
• ch w ..~,~r~ b W -P w F- ~ ~ a ~ w ~ ~ U U 0 0 w Z Umw ~
2 b 00 GD ~ 0 _ . ~ ~ Z ~ JU
~ ~ko '~40 , . $ o U _ >
4 ~ a .s . , 3 _ . g s~. 1~D~lu. 41 • I5 ~*4 3 , EYl W~~ Q a
\ r ~ ~ , ~ ~ ~ ~ ItiaFaa4+N • R~ N~Qv~Au. 48 ~ 20 5
-P 4
~ ToP. 348,8 ~ , 'PLa~.
\ ,
~ ~ T7 ~ ~ . T_ . ~k All Gael
GROUND 3" Sleeve . 8" . r
OR 1 a" _ a 1~I N1v~UMn~f`M of ~ Z
SIDEWALK rill sleeve with \ vs ~ 4~O~Q,. arVt .
CONCRETE grout material, \ _ a e t 8 such as R ils 3 3' ~ ~ (c X11 ~x£
to be approved by in 3.n , : . 1,~~+P ~~aS iKl I~~O
m ~ the engineer A H
. vv~r.n ~ o
, Z _ cq
~ n ~ESSlp 9•p ~Il~x~ p ~ d,~~s~l~ "t) q, ,a ~Z, SRS
t'Jate: H ~ I~Gll~taly
-.l " I.D. Steel Rails c ~ ~ s ~ I5 6 m ~ E...~ M
6,p~ (Headwalls and/or Wingwallsl ~ Maximum Span ~ ~
*Note= puantit of handrail to be pai~~ II y Vl~~,`ie ~a
Y will be the number of linear • ,fin P ' , ~ A. ~
:Installation of a hand rail is required on head ~ of handrail as measured along I So "+Ite• i r.
walls and w~.ngwalls, ar along a wa.ngwall location 8 3 q
' t built for all locations where: top rail, complete in place anr~ 3 even if one is na ~ ''3~6 To ~ ~ ~ P ~ 348.3
ainted. ~ P ~ 1. There is a single pipe culvert 42 a.n diameter ! ~ w ~
~ 3 or larger" ~ 3 ~ ! I . ~ ~ n ~ '~xczs Top dF ~ ~ . 0 ~ 11.. I~
box culvert ar 5TANbARD DCTAILS AND SPCCII'ICATTO' 1,, 3yo 2. A , 3 ~o ~ 40 ~
3, There are mull•i le i e culvertt~ whe ~ p ,p p re one or Lp ~
more of the pipes a.s 3q" in diameter or larger. * r ~ N j
nl4... ..P h T ao wp w w _ ~
~ ~ ~ ~ i~
o o ~ n ~ GSVSY. Ja~lT' 3 'R/c. I
54 Rip iNVEAT Ta
NOT TO SCALE 8E t" NIW~,R 'MA?~ Y'a'r~c~! 3~ PVC 'DRAINS,
NOT TO SCALE
STEEL RAILING ALONG ALL WALL ~,,.~.,..,~w~.~~„µ
TOPS, SEE DETAIL,
y~ 6 T ~I 4,~ ~ I
HEADWALL. SEE DETAIL 1 I ~ ~ k ~ ~ € I { ~
IMNGWALL, SEE DETAIL, ~ ~ { I 3 !
~ # 4"THICK CONCRETE ~ I 1 ~ w
CHANNEL SIDEWALL ~ r~ ' a
W\ WELDED WIRE h~ESH. I , 3 y "b 4
~ ~ „8„ a~ 1 a° +
,~E' I ~ HEADWALL TOP ELEV, = 348.5 ~ 1 ~ I t I I
w__. ~ ~ _ _.1_..~..,w..__..__..,.._.. ~_w ~ i ......~.~e..m..~.......a.w,.....w...~.W.. 6 . , .~.......n.~_~..__._.,_.~
j ~ r ~ _..w... w ~ ~ "
R $ ; ...~........~.A I ~ ~ I J f I E r ~ f ,~..~.F..y ~ ~ ~
{ I i i s ~ I 1' ~ Z r ~ ~
7.6' fi ~ ~ 11 ~ ~ 1 ~ I '~4 € a 3 ~ I'`~. I I ~ 1 ' t ~
/N~ ' ~ ' ,~P~, ~ nFStiF z.ri ~ s,, i \ \ N
,~°''~~0 " TO ~ C ~ M~ r' I SHAPE CONCRETE TO PROVIDE - „ ~ ! I STEEL STEPS 0 12 OC, FkjR k I f~. " V ~ { s W TO PROVIDE I 1 ~ O~O,~~~G ~ I I ~ Z
A ,~y' OF ( EACH SIDE OF 54"RCP, PER Sn N L. ,r~~ . 1 DEEP V-NOTCH FOR EACH FOR EACH ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
CHANNEL SIDEWALL TOP ; ~-COQ ~ w NCDOT STANDARD DETAI ' C _ ~ DRAIN, ALONG ENTIRE 27 ELEV, 341.9 Z L 840.66, I CHANNEL LENGTH, 1RE 27 ~ , i t i '''1 ~ F ~ ~ I ~
~ [ ~ (HEADWALL 47 ONLY, NOT HEADWALL 48.) ~ i ~ ~ j 1 } x f i ~
r ~ Q { ~t ~ CHANNEL SPILLWAY ti.- , 1 I 3 W ~ ~ ? j ~ ,i i ~ SIDEWALLS END ~
ELEV, 340.9 i w I ' ~ ~ ~ INTO WINGWALLS, ~ a ~ i ~ ~ n-...... ~ ~ w
o f , ~ ? • t f~, I ~ ' _ ~ i
I ; ~ ~t ~ ~ I i ~ 1 SHAPE CONCRETE Td PROM ' ~ I a \1 I I ~ r ~ DE r I ~ o ~ ; ~ t DEEP V-NOTCH F~R~EACH '~~5~ i
~ ~ - pI, ~ ~ 3 ! o~` j I ; 1 I~ I 3 E 1 ,J~~ Y I ~ I I ~ DRAIN, ALONG ENTIRE 22 j
" II „ , III MI. ~ I 3 DIA, DRAINS, ¢ ~ 4 THICK X 3 DEEP I ~ { ? i ~ I I I ~ I CHANNEL LENGTH, ; i w )EEP I I I ~ € ~ f I
I I r CONCRETE KEYWALL. , I INV, = 335,9 ~ i i I j i ~ ~ m ;YWALL. I ~m I I I i j ~ 'I j I i j j ~
~ ti j i III ~ ~ k w~ ;o ~ ~W ~ ~ ~ ~ Q, r i I ~ I ".h ~ I I ~ I j i ~ Z
3; ,w , _-~,p I I , ~~.I I CHANNEL K Y ~ ~ I ' ! I ~ I E WALL BOTTOM ; v r~ ~~-.-mow,, E I ~ I r i h~ I ~ ~ I I ~ I I g ~ DATE: i i t I ~ I 4110102
~Q ~ I I I ~ I I, i I I ELEV, 337,9 ~ E ~ w ~ 1III i ~ ~ E ~ ~ I ~ I ~ , ~ i I Jab N0: 00208
~ I I ..~I I , I ~ I r~ I ~ j i ~ I I ~ A r' 1 ~
2' "A" o f I i I t i I o f 0,31 I I I I I I I ! ' i DRA N ~ I ~ I ~ I ,i i wl c: 00-208DETAILS I i I ~ I 1 ~ ? ~i t l ~ I I ....~.a
~ s I_ ~ ~ , 1 i ~ i1' ~ ~ E ^ DESIGNED: ~ ; I I ~ ~ ; I ~ I SJB
L_ I Im~~ w' CHANNEL FLOOR = 335,9 m._"°~~~---~-----~--- - . I . ....._we._.~. 1 ~ ~ _v~.- ~ ~ _ , ~ ~ ` M~ (4) 3"PVC DRAINS r~`~ _ I ~ ; ~ , ~`~'a ~ I DRANIN;
~ I .w~_.__... w_4< _w___~_.~.~ 1 _ ...w_. ~ u....__ _!_M_~.,_, SJB
; ~___.__.....___~_~..__~_..__..~_.~...~___~.m._.~~___.______.~_.__ 4"THICK X 3'DEEP ~ ~ „B„ I ~ ~ ' ' ! CHECKED: r I ~ i i ..~...__...V._.._~~,_~.....M.~...._._...~._._.~__..____..~._._...~___....._..~_.._,__~..._~....___,_._.._._~.,~~~_._.._...__..._...__.~...._~._._..,._.._,...a.._.~_~.~,._..._ J
CONCRETE KEYWALL ~ j ! ~ ~ HDRITONTAL SCALE: E _..m~..o.~_.__.__.e._n.....~.._.._~.......,.~__...._._.__......._..a__.......r ~....._._l._..W.~_._.__......~._._..~......_..! .~..~..___.__.._,,...d._..~,.._......~_._.__,,.,_.....~_......_._~,_...._..__.__~.....~...___..__.W._.._._~.,_._.~._..W~,.._,_
1' 6~ g' 6' 1' _.~_..v.~.....~....~.~_.~~..o.~_._. J NA
1 ~ 18' VERTICAL SCALE: ~ ~ 1 ~ 18' 1' NA
4"THICK CONCRETE CHANNEL 4"TUirk rnNrRGTC ruen~uri
W\ NEEDED PARE MESH. V/~ NEEDED MARE MESFI. 4 INIUK UUNUKLIt UNANNtL
W\ WELDED WRE MESH.
wA-Aw n "
CONCRETE CHANNEL a HEADWALL 47 SECTION "A-A°
NOT TO SCALE kLE I40T TO SCALE
NOT TO SCALE
OF 24

POND ~ DETENTION DE1EN110N DALI TOP SPILLWAY FLOOR SPILLWAY SPILLWAY ORIFlCE ORIFlCE OUTLET PIPE OUTLET PIPE OUTLET PIPE OUTLET PIPE OUTLET PIPE RI VOLUME DEPTH ELEVATION ELEVATION ELEVATION WIDTH DEPTH ELEVA110N DIAMETER RICH INVERT LOW INVERT LENGTH SLOPE RIPRAP EI I NEL SPILLWAY AND SPREADER SPREADER SPREADER SPREADER Z OUTLET PIPE RISER TOP RISER CONCRETE SPILL CHANNEL SP LL CHAN ~ Q RIPRAP ELEVATION DIAMETER RISER ANCHOR LENGTH SLOPE SPREADER RIPRAP ENT, WIDTH DEPTH END NiDTH LENGTH Z
POND 1 805 CF 3,0' 355,D 354.0 351.0 3,0' 1.0' J504 4,0" 350.4 3500 40' 1,0% CLASS 'A' CLASS 'A' N/A N/A N/A 25' 20% 9"DIA. x 12'TH 10 0,5' 3' 10' U
8'L X 5'W X 8"TH P ~ L X 5'W X 8"TH IW Q,
POND 2 3,880 CF 3,0' 341,0 340,0 337,0 12,0' 1.0' 338,8 4,8` 338,8 338,0 88' 1.0% CLASS "A' 8'L X 5'W X 8'TH CLASS "A' N/A N/A N/A 40' 10% 8" DIA. X 10`TH 16' 0,8' 3' 20' Z ~ ~ I'L X 5'W X 8'TH ~ Z ~
POND 3 8,599 CF 3,0' 341.0 340.0 337,0 14,0' 1,0' 336.4 3,4" 338.4 338,0 35' 1,0% CLASS "A' 8'L X 5'W X 8`TH CLASS "A' N/A N/A N/A 40' 10% 8"DIA X 10`TH 16' 0,8' 3' 20' Z ~ ~ I'L X 5'W X 8"TH W N
POND 4 13,987 CF 4,0' 38J.0 381.0 358,0 8,0' 2.0' 355.9 4,4" 355,9 355,0 90' 1.0% CLASS "A" t0X SPILLWAY - 9'bIA X 12"TH 24' 0,7' 3' 30' ~ q.ASS A 380.0 48"CMP 55 CU.FT, 80'
8'l X 5 W X B'TH I'L X 5'W X 8'TH e'L X 8'W x 3'H PIPE - 8"DIA X 10'TH 10' 0,5' J' 10' ~ Q. {.L.
POND 5 11,123 CF 3,0' 344.0 3420 339.0 8,0' 2.0' 338,5 4,5' 338.5 338,1 38' 1.0% CLASS "A' 8'L X 5'W X 8`TH CLASS "A' N/A N/A N/A 80' S% SPIIIWAY - 8"DIA x 10"TH " , W ~ I'L X 5'W X 8TH PIPE - 8'DIA X 10'TH 10' 0,5' 3 10' ~ H X
~ v=i~d
N w cv {.i. ~ N M
Q' ~ QV~ 0
~ZN U
W Q=~ 3 ~ o
v J ~ o. ~ n. ~ .p
~ ~ U ~ ~ N
W Z U~w ~ Z a~U
= Z °0 ='0
U Q ~ J
Q 0-
~ ~
'r ~
/ .w_.~.__.__. ` ~ ~ ` 6"DIA. STEEL TRASH RACK TOP RING.
REBAR Q 8 MAX, SPACING, (TYPICAL)

~ CMP RISER, ,iJ
~ ~
`
~ 8" MAX, REBAR SPACING,
I 1' ~
~ ~
~ / ~ ~ CMP TRASH RACK BASE RING; ~
MP THAT IS i ~ ' CUT AN 8 LONG SECTION OF C 6"DIA. LARGER THAN THE RISER DIAMETER.
flN15HED GROUND,
,....~,,.._.._v~._. _~.__._.~...~._._.~._...__...w..___..~.___..~___.__.__~, ' - - WELD TRASH RACK BASE RING TO CMP RISER ~ EXISTING CRWND.
WITH FOUR STEEL FLANGES.
6" SPILLWAY CUT MITO E>aSTING GROUND.
- ~ ~ " SPI N'AY 8' WIDE WIDTH"~ DAM TOP
I 4° 6 DIA. STEEL TRASH RACK TOP RING. CONE HEIGHT ~ " DAM TOP ELE F--I I--I
EQUALS RISER REBAR ~ 8 MAX. SPACING. (TYPICAL,) SPILLWAY DAM TOP ELEVATION, - SPILLWAY DEPTH, _ - _ ~ SPILLWAY _ -
RADIUS. I SPILLWAY ELE SPILLWAY ELEVATION, " FLARED-END SECTION.
i `'L_,
RISER TOP ELEVATION. --ALIGN TOP OF CMP TRASH RACK BASE RING " ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ WITH RISER TOP, DETENTION RIPRAP AND LEVEL SPREADER AS + DETENTION `5 SPECIFED.
8 I ~ ~ I DETENTION DEPTH, VOLUME ~ ~ N , 'QQo
i ~ w~ ' , ~ Myw
i FLOOR ELE FLOOR ELEVA110N, 15" DIA, ~l
i ~ ~ CMP OU TIEi PIPE
~ CMP TRASH RACK BASE RING: I CUT AN 8" LONG SECTION OF CMP THAT IS
i CMP RISER " I 6 DIA, LARGER THAN THE RISER DIAMETER.
' I I WELD TRASH RACK BASE RING TO CMP RISER OONpiE1E ANTI-SEA COIlARA
rx~'xe'n+.
CMP TRASH RACK BASE RING WITH FOUR STEEL FLANGES, STEEL ORIFN~ PLATE. WELD PLATE TO CHIP OUTLET PIPE. (NO LEAKS.)
CUT ORIFICE HOLE INTO PLATE AT DIAMETER AND INVERT ELEVAl10N
SPEgFIED.
3'L X 3'W X 4"1H CONCRETE PAD BELOW ORIFCE,
~a~,aa~~alar.',~.
~
i
_ w '
M1v
' ~
°,.+.~o~J~~N~dci
~r. ;x,11 ~v° .r,,RrL.

m
,
1 1
~.t ~.t
'G. 'G,
FlNISHED GROUND. Z
TRANSITION TO ZERO GRADE 0 `gym. EltlSTING GROUND. Q
VEGETATED DIVERSION
STABILIZED SLOPE V SPILLWAY CUT INTO EXISTING ~ GROUND. (n N
Z ~
J
STABLE UNDISTURBED • • • • • • • SPltl AY 8' WIDE W WIDTH`'~t DAM TOP
W1LET ~ . . 1--I f-i
DAM TOP ELI SPILLWAti DAM TOP ELEVATION. - - CONICAL TRASH RACK. LU ~ SPILLWAY ~}'a, SEE DETAIL SPILLWAY DEPTH.
' . SPILLWAY EU SPILLWAY ELEVATION.
• RISER TOPEU 2-YEAR STORM VOLUME ~ FLARED-END SECTION. RISER TOP ELEVATION, a ~ ~
RIPRAP AND LEVEL SPREADER A5 Q ~ ~ SPECIFED.
DETENTION DETENTION N Sr DETENTION DEPTH. VOLUME s
i r, O W ;I. m
i,; I` 1 " ..t ~ FLOOR ELEVA110N. 5 DIq, CMP ~
LEVEL UP OF SPREADER VARIABLE FLOOR EU CR.;.. OUTLET PIPE ' z
MATERIAL STAPLED IN PLACE DATE: 4110102
z Job No: 00208
s n CONCRETE ANTI-SEEP COLLARS,
3' x 3' X e"TH. DRAWING: 00-208DETAILS CMP RISER. (DIAMETER AS SPECIFIED,)
WELD OUTLET PIPE TO RISER. (NO LEAKS.) DESIGNED: SJB
CONCRETE ANCHOR AS SPEgflED. DRAWN: SJB
BURIED 8` MINIMUM 15'DIA. CMP. WELD TO RISER, (NO LEAKS)
STEEL ORIFCE PLATE WELD PLATE CHECKED: TO 15' DIA, CMP PIPE (NO LEAKS)
CONSTRUC110N SPEgFlCAiIONS CUT ORIFICE HOLE INTO PLATE AT HORI20NTAL SCALE;
1. 1HE MATTING SHOULD BE A MINIMUM OF 4-FT. WIDE EXTENDING 8 INCHES OVER THE UP AND BURIED DIAMETER AND INVERT ELEVATION NA SPEgFlED~ VERTICAL SCALE;
B INCHES DEEP IN A VERTICAL TRENCH ON THE LOWER EDGE, THE UPPER EDGE SHOULD BUTT AGAINST SMOOTHLY CUT SOD AND EIE SECURELY HELD IN PLACE Wi1H CLOSELY SPACED HEAVY DUTY 3'L X 3'W X 4'TH CONgtETE PAD NA
WIRE STAPLES AT LEAST 12 INCHES LONG. 2, ENSURE THAT THE SPREADER UP IS LEVEL FOR UNIFORM SPREADING OF STORM RUNOFF, BELOW ORIFICE.
3, CONSTRUCT THE LEVEL SPREADER ON UNDISTURBED SOIL (NOT ON FlLL), 4, CONSTRUCT A 20-FT, TRANSITION SECTION FROM THE DIVERSION CHANNEL TO BLEND SMOOTHLY TO SHEET N0.
INE 11IDTH AND DEPTH OF THE SPNEAUEK 5. DISPERSE RUNOFF FROM THE SPREADER ACROSS A PROPERLY STABILIZED SLOPE NOT TO EXCEED
1OX MAKE SURE THE SLOPE IS SUFFICIENTLY SMOOTH TO KEEP FLOW FROM CONCENTRATING. 8, IMMEDIATELY AFTER ITS CONSTRUCTION, APPROPRIATELY SEED AND MULCH THE ENTIRE DISTURBED
AREA OF THE SPREADER. TYPICAL SN L SMALL DETENTION POND (WITH RISER) 22
LEVEL SPREADER usi USE THIS DETAIL FOR DETENTION POND 4.
OF 24

_
~ ~ O 8 I 5 Z O ~ ~ 0
-mac 39 ~ Ai ~ A ~ I I \ z ~ U
\ ~ ~ ~ . ~ p0 t.~ ~ \ \ ~ w
° OPEN S~~ACE "B" _ ` ~ °t`~ ~ 1 .~-~-a--~-- 1 'WIDE STORM ~ ~ ~r, \ t / ~ 1 i ~ / w F-
D AiNAGE ESMT. ~ I 1~ \ i \ ~ ~ z I ~1 , 1 9 LOT 10 ~ '0
` ~ I ~ 1 ~ - ~ 1 ~ ~ ~ r Z 0 I \ ~
LOT 33 ~ ~ OT rt, LOT 21 I L 32 u ~ ~ 1 ~ ' ~ f ~
/ ~r3 1 o \ l i1 \ ~ ``t ~ / 4 a ~ ' 1 ~ ° ~ ~ y ~ 1 ~ 1 / ~
% \ \ ~ \ /
~6 ~ ~ ~ ~ 1 1 ~ / m I i ~ 1 1 / ~ x
f r' MINOR DIVERSION i ~ ~ ~ 1 \ 1 1 \ ~ / ~ • \ ~ 32' WIDE S RM 1 ~ ~t LOT/9 `.t w cv SION B DRAINAGE E T. V `t 1 1 / > ~
j DITCH, .SEE DETAIL. ti ' ~ ~ i , LOT 11 ~ - ~ ~ DETAIL. V 1 \ 1 I ~ ao ~ I o U ~ o
LOT 22 ` i f i LOT 20 ~ 1 { 1 I: 16 WIDE S RM w ~ c? U
a i i \ I ~ ~ ~ ~ I ~ DRAINAGE E r , w ~ I a, ; y \ 1, I 16 WIDE STOR ! I W Q z r~
, 16 WIDE S ° \ 1 ~ ~ DRAINAGE ESMT. 3 ( ~ w ~ U ~ 3 ' STORM ~ r ~ \ ~ I t 68 f ~ O ~ 0 16 WIDE i A j I ~ ~ rn
r DRAINAGE l DRAINAGE ESMT. o ~ ~ ~ 1 ~ _ 1 ~ 0 ~ I ~ ~ I .o N- ~ ~ o, o
~s LOT 31 ~ LOT 34 ~ ~ ~ LOT ~ I I I w Z o w > LOT19 I 1 I I _ U m
~ ~ M~ I' I 1 I z o~u I I = o
k. 4 ~ ~ ~ r~ \ ~ ~I I' I I \ z o-o I I I , 1 I U Q z>
\ O I I ; MINOR DIVERSION B8 ~ I LOT 8 ~ ~ C I I DITCH. SEE DETAIL. / ( Q n-
' \ ~ ` ~ 16 WIDE STORM ~a ! ` I I I ( ~ I ? I 1
DRAINAGE ESML 0 / ~ ~ I ~'v 1 r' I I 1 ~ ~ I l
~ 5~, LOT 23 I ~I l I I LOT 12 / 1.
\ / -._CA I 1 , ~ ~ TENTION 1 LOT 18 I \ DE / r„ j ~
LOT 35 \ / LQT 30 y, \ .1 r.~ ,r ~ I ! ' 3, ~ ~ ~
f •t \ \ ~ .u LOT 24 .lam 3 e ~ ~ \ CONCRETE
,i'' ~ \ 350: , \ ~5~ wl 1~, MONUMENT
~ ~ r• S , ~~~~1~ pU ~ ~ ~ a ! , ~ Vl wl LOT 7~ fl . ~ ~ - ~ 1,
r ~ 5 :ti t~ ~ AR, VdDTH
_ - - - ~ - - - ~ 5 ' • ~ \ TORY uu - - \ \ ~ DRAINAGE ES
~ ~ { \ \ \ . 1
1 \ ; ~ ~ v ~ ~ 1 }
LOT 29 e~ \ a 1 11
~ LOT 36 ~ s ~ LOT 17 \SEE- H AND WINGWALLS ' o ~ ( ~
~ ~e t,~,. 1 A [1ETAIL$. V A I Y ~
LOT 25 o, ~~VAR. N~OTH STORM 5
~ DRAINAGE ESMT, ~ . ~ 15 \ ~ ~ , \ \ \ LOT 6
~ ~ d,~J ~ EE.DETAIL-~~/ a ~ A \
\ ' ` ~ ~ s ~ TE... HANN L ~ A
\ ~ ~ , \ r~... , \ \
LOT 37 'J~ VAR,' WIDTH STORM Q ~P LOT 28 ~ DRA AGE. ESMT, 6 ~s 19 f ~ SEE HEAD ALL v \ ~ A LOT 1 e r ~ v \
~ ,1 DETENTION 2 lt1ND WING S ~ MEDIUM DIVERSION I 4 DERAILS. SEE DETAI
f'%' ~ \ LOT 27 LOT' 26 I w ~ k ti \ \ ~ \
39C,,_ rn ~6/ is \ ~ \ ''s.
~ s MINOR DIVER IpN \ \ ~ ~ , '8 ETAIL , / S , \ H. SEE D C r s \ \ ~ FUTURE..
i u...~,~' ' / r~ 32' WIDE STDRM \ ,y \ \
1 W ~ , ~ ,F t \ ~ 37 / DRAINAGE EsMT. ~ ~ IJEVELOPMENT ~ L T 13 t,~ \ ~
LOT 40 ' 4 ~ i `fin \ ` 4", \ ~r g~p V1 R SMT.RM ~ \ \ \
LOT 39 ~ a W AINA ~
16' WIDE STORM ~ , LOT 15 i, ~ ~ \ \ j ~ \ \ ~ \ ~ \
DRAINAGE ESMT. ~e ~ cc ~ / 't,A \ a ' DETENTION V
s ti~ W %W y ~ s%i 3 3 \ \
~ Spu / / s;, SS I \ ~ \ S is~ VAR. WIDTI~ 1 ~ ~ \ 16' WIDE STORM
~ ~ LOT 41 ' _ - - _ ~ \ 3 a r STORM DRAMAGE I ~ 1 DRAINAGE ESMT.
\ \ h ~ ~ ~ ~ LOT 14 ;I Ss \ a, ,ESML I ( ~ r' ` , H
/ / ~ I EI 4
S \ ~ ~ ~ LOT 42 LOT 43 `I ; I ~ ~ A, ~ 1
ASS ^ ~ I ~ ,,I TNT ON 5 ; s ~
6 ~v`~I I I I, 1 Y,Q ~ 1
, ~ i _ _ y m ~ v o I I~ \ ~ 1 1 ,
~ i ss ~ \ ~A V ~I \ a o 16' WIDE STORM / / ~ \ I \ * ,f
_ ~ d~ -.c, _ _ ~ r a , DRAINAGE ESMT. \ \ NII IVERSION DI H. \ 1 r ~ ~o s \ ~ , / SEE DETA ; : as
G ---r-----
G _ LOT 44 ~ - - ~ I - , S 5 MINOR DIVERSION ~ ~ \ I 1 ,1 r.:,,..,,
DITCH. SEE DETAIL. 4 ` ` 11 1 1 1 ~ r LOT 2 ~ ~ a„o ~
r,,, VAR. n~ ~ DRAINAGE~ES ~ ~ `~s ~ n., of ~ ' w a I c`°° ~ 1 ~~I 1 , 1 , , . 5 ~ \ t , ;
s ~ STORM DRAINAGE STRUCTURES TABLE ~ ~ ~w ~ r ; t
STRUCTURE TOP INV. IN INV, OUT REMARKS _ ~ ~ ~ ~ - ~ 'ass ~ / ~ 1 1 ! ` J 1'`, 1 LOT 45 ~ 1 l ~ ~ ~ VAR. WID STORM
DOUBLE CI 1 397.30 3 0.30 N - ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ S~+ LOT 45 CI 2 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~G - ~ r,-~ 5 S 11 I'~~ 1 1 I ~ DRAINAGE ESMT. ~ , ; / t I ~ ' 16~ MAY oz ~ .
397.30 390.10 S 389.90 NE \ ~ - w ~ nz$s CI 3 391.80 385.0 SW 364.80 SE ~ ~ \ ~ 1 I. 1 ! ~ 16' WIDE STORM ~ ~ ~ /
CI 4 391,80 384,60 NW 379.00 SE ~ ~ ~ ~ DRAINAGE ESML II 1 1- ~ - K as rr j / v ~ A
JB 5 388.00 373.50 NW 373.30 SE STORM DRAINAGE PIPE TABLE f W -`fin ~ I,uy~ ~ ~ ~ ~ / ~ ~ ; I 1 °33 LOT 3 / ~ ; I ~ , , 1 } ; 1 ~ 1 ~
FES 6 371,00 CLASS B RIPRAP APRON - 12 Lx6 Wx8 TH FROM TO DIA. MAT. LENGTH SLOPE y \ Ro .4 ~ \ , ...m,.,f ~,h~ ~ \ MINOR IVERSION / ~ 1 1 ~ r` /
DOUBLE CI 1 CI 2 15" RCP 23' 1.OX ~ ° ~ ~ ~ s ~ 17 " ~ M s,~ ~ \ C 382.00 374.40 W CI 2 CI 3 15 RCP 177 2,896 ~ ~RF ~ DITCH. E ~ DETAIL. / ~r I 1, , / ~
CI 8 382.00 374,20 E 374,00 NW CI 3 CI 4 15" RCP 23' 1.OX ~ gar ~ A MINOR DIVERSION DITCH. I / 1 ~ j. w / / ~ ~ \SEE DETAIL. I > ~ ~ ' ~ t ~
377.14 369.60 SE 369.40 NW C JB 5 15 RCP 55 10AX eqS~ o,~ ~ \ a / I s,/ \ 1 ti, 1 1
CI 10 a~ VAR. T 1^Q 375.75 367,78 S JB 5 FES 6 15 RCP 83 2.8% ~ w / ~ 1 t \ ss \ ~ 1 \
~ RAINAG ~s CI 11 375.75 367.54 N 367.44 W \ ~ ~ r;5~ Is . .1 1 \ / \ I , ~
_ 367.54 SE CI 7 CI 8 15" RCP 23' 1,0% ° ' e FES 12 370.00 CI 8 CI 9 15" RCP 96' 4.6x 1 `;1 ,
CI 13 N t _ ~ ~ 376.91 366.70 E 366.50 N CI 9 CI 11 15 RCP 78 2.496 % ~ ,~Y°--. \ LOT 1 I I r'' ~ / . I ~ I MINOR VERSION DITCH, ' 1 't
367.50 S CI 10 CI 11 15" RCP 21' 1.096 ~ ?ti ~ SEE DET I z x,16 WIDE STORM I ~ o
1114 364.00 360.20 E CI 11 CI 13 18 RCP 62 1,OX ~ ~ ~ a d DRAINAGE ESMT.: c;7
YI 15 363.00 358.30 W 358.10 E FES 12 P l t CI 13 18 RC 25 10.0% 5 3 ~ i / ~ i ~ ~
358.30 S CI 13 YI 15 24" RCP 130' 6.3x v 1~ 16 367.00 356.80 356.60 YI 14 YI 15 15" RCP 33' 5,896 \ q~ n6 _ . ~ \ (n N M° \ ~ ` ~ ~ 338 / \ w Z o
FES 17 LASS "B" RIPRAP APRON - 12'Lx6'Wx14"TH YI 15 ~ ~ 356.00 YI 16 24 RCP 63 2.1 % ,
RISER 18 360.00 355.90 EE POND DETAILS SHEET, YI 16 FES 17 30" RCP 62' 1,OX \ ~ ~a \ - \ `:'~.`~x dA VAR. WIDTH STORM 1 ~
FES 9 355.00 CLASS A RIPRAP APRON 6 Lx5 Wx6 TH RISER 18 FES 19 15 RCP 89 1.OX \ \ ~ I DRAINAGE ESMT, e ~
REMOVE EX. \ <<~ 'a ~ EX. \ AA W ~ \ ,i;.
CI 20 360.90 354.0 SE CI 20 CI 21 15" RCP 2i' 1,0% RM PIPES ~ CI 21 360.90 353.80 NW 353,60 E CI 21 CI 22 15" RCP 31' 1,396 U R DRIVEWA I PIPES , \ ~~3 \ t
CI 22 358.20 353.40 W 353.20 SE CI 22 CI 24 15" RCP 162' 4,4X ; \ \ , \ .
N ~ FES 23 347,00 FES 23 CI 24 36 RCP 35 2.OX ~ \ \
CI 24 353.02 346.10 NW 345.87 NE CI 24 CI 25 36" RCP 29' 1.OX 't, \
346.30 SW CI 25 FES 26 36" RCP 60' 1,0% \ \ ~
CI 25 353.02 345.58 SW 339.50 N 11 27 FES 28 15" RCP 45' 1,0% ~.,,y ' FES 26 339.00 CLASS "B" RIPRAP APRON - 18'Lx8'Wx14"TH PIPE 29 FES 30 15" RCP 36' 1.096 `ti4 \ \ \ ~ m \ \
YI27 354.50 339.50 \ \ \ ~ \ \ \ ~ \ z
FES 28 339.00 CLASS "A" RIPRAP APRON - 6'Lx5'Wx6"TH YI 31 FES 32 15" RCP 18' 1,0?: \ \ \ \ ` \ DATE. 4109102
PIPE 29 338,50 SEE POND DETAILS SHEET. PIPE 33 FES 34 15" RCP 40' 1,0% ~ \
FES 30 338.10 CLASS "A" RIPRAP APRON - 6'lx5'Wx6"TH \ ~ a \ Joe No: 00208 \ \
DOUBLE CI 35 CI 36 18" RCP 21' 1.096 NOTES YI 31 356.50 351,20 N CI 36 FES 37 18" RCP 85' 1,OX NOTE "A" \ \ \ DRAWING: \ VAR. WIDTH ~$TOR 00-208-04
FES 32 " " _ ~ ~ N " ~ A STORM WATER FACILITY OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE PERMIT AGREEMENT, 351,00 CLASS A RIPRAP APRON 6 Lx5 Wx6 TH FES 38 YI 39 15" RCP 76 10.2X STORM WATER FACILITY PERMIT FEE X2,000 PER DETENTION POND/WATER ' \ DRAINAGE ESf~1T. O„a \ \ \ DESIGNED;
PIPE 33 350.40 SEE POND DETAILS SHEET, YI 39 F 40 18 RCP 49 1 OX ~ ' ES QUALITY POND/DEVICE), AND PERPETUAL SURETY FOR THE CONTINUOUS • \ \ SJB
FES 34 350.00 CLASS "A" RIPRAP APRON - 6'Lx5'Wx6"TH PIPE 41 FES 42 15" RCP 46' 1,096 OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE OF THE FACILITY (BASED ON FINAL DESIGN OF DRAWN. LMHlSJB
" ~ POND/DEVICE)IS REQUIRED PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION PLAN APPROVAL FOR ALL DOUBLE CI 35 350.18 340.00 N YI 43 FES 44 24 RCP 24 1,096 STORM WATER CONTROL FACILITIES. AN AS-BUILT CERTIFICATION PROVIDED BY CHECKED;
CI 36 350.18 339.80 S 337,90 E PIPE 45 FES 46 15" RCP 67' 1,OX THE DESIGN ENGINEER IS REQUIRED PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF A CERTIFICATE OF HORIZONTAL SCALE:
FES 37 337,00 CLASS "A" RIPRAP APRON - 6'Lx5'Wx6"TH OCCUPANCY FOR ANY STORM WATER FACILITY CONSTRUCTED, 1"=60'
HW 47 HW 48 54" RCP 54' 0,31% NOTE "B" VERTICAL SCALE:
FES 38 347.00 THE EXISTING NEUSE RIPARIAN STREAM BUFFER IS NOT TO BE DISTURBED, WITH NA
YI 39 342.00 339.20 SE 337.50 W THE EXCEPTION OF 149 LINEAR FEET (14,343 SQ. FT.) OF DISTURBANCE AT FES 40 337.00 CLASS "A" RIPRAP APRON - 6'Lx5'Wx6"TH THE STREAM CROSSING FOR BLACKSTONE DRIVE. THIS AREA IS TO BE SHEET N0.
PIPE 41 336.40 5EE POND DETAILS SHEET, REVEGETATED ACCORDING TO THE "REVEGETATION PLAN."
ht5 41 336.00 CLASS "A" RIPRAP APRON - 6'Lx5'Wx6 TH
'1 43 342.00 337.30 NE FES 44 337.00 CLASS "A" RIPRAP APRON - 6'Lx5'Wx6"TH SCALE V = 60' 1 7
PIPE 45 336.60 SEE POND DETAILS SHEET.
FES 46 336.00 CLASS "A" RIPRAP APRON - 6'Lx5'Wx6"TH 60' 0 60' 120'
HW 47 336.10 CONCRETE CHANNEL - SEE DETAIL. HW 48 335.90 CLASS "8" RIPRAP APRON - 27'Lx14'Wx12"TH OF 24

Z
~ ~
Z ~ ~ U
Project: Project No. w ~
Project: . Project No. w ~ Z vf-i ~
B By : Checked • ~ Z ~ Checked: CALLEMI'N~PARKER Z Q ~
CAIIEMYN ~ PARKER ~ AIAIw"IIA/ 1.0"" W U M
` A"MI"lIFAR~IROWN ZG• ~v ~ of + ~ Date: Sheet Sheet_____~of
I Date: * o ~
t~. ~ V
. _ v~,Rln~ ~ A x ~ ~ LL
,
__._______r- G ~wvl ~ ~ E
6 , 0 max;- A ~ N 0 Z ~ 0 c~` ~~~IZ OIG~~'OM ~ .N
~ P li w o V?~ ~ 0 ~
~ ~ w ~ ~ a ~:b~ 3 U ~ o v
2' ~ ~ w b w w ~ w Z Umw ~
~,r~ N" ~ v ~o 2 ~ ~ Z o~~ ioo ~o ~ ~ = o ~ a
a' ~ U z >
~ ~ ~ 6 3 4O•S - - o ~ s _ . ~ . I~D~41. is ~4 3.Qa W~~ . a a
\ r ti 4 ~ ~p ' ~ _ . ~~ApWA~. ¢8:20 1
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 1~ N .
c~, k~ q 3 T• kV q r . A ~y ~ .
TnP:346,g 3 "PLb,~~ l
~ ~ ~ ~ J_
-lo c~~c. os Gtr-~~f.
3 Sleeve 8" ` GRQUNb n I~7 NIKI nnt+ d~M 1. _ ~ _ ~ tiara, able..
QR l© ` ~ I( Cill sleeve with ~ ~ c u , N ~
SIDEWAL ~ a ial NCRETE grout m ter , CO ailset 4 5~oa~ h 'LII .
8 such as R 3 3 SINS ~t I-!o H P ~i
to be a roved by - PP min mi.n , . ;
the en iheer ~ g ~ ~ ~ , _ ~ -P in - ~n o• aSN Rp ~ ~ . 1.
. _ ~ 2. • _ rn
• i~ES51p 9.~ X11 ark ~~ac~Wi n Q ~ , P~ F...~ -b c .q S ~ S 41
~ n NG?Il~ltt?g SE ~
Cate; • 15 „ i ~
b. Steel Rails ~ _.l~ I' ~eadwalls and/or Wingwalls~ ~ ~ (TT S t( : ~ ~ I I.3
w Maximum Span ~ 6.0 ti VI~LL,e . 4
*Note= Quantity of handrail to be pail -
' will be the number of linear t, :n °Eus+ 1 w ~
' n of a hand rail is required on head-~ as measured along I ~ 8 Installat~.o of handrail s 3~ ~ .3
an win walls, ar along a wingwall location lace anr~ wa11s d g ail coin fete in p a.3~ T ` far all locat~.ons where: top r p ~ R, , ~ ' ~ ToP ; 349.3 ' ° ~l, .
even if one is not bu~.lt? aimed. ~ ~ 1 ~ p ,4 ~w ,4 c ~ ~ n ~ ~z.z Tq~ ~
i e culvert 42 in diameter ~ ,,3 1. inhere ~.s a single p p o ~ ~ o -emu. •I
~ ° 3 ar larger. 5T11NDnRD DE'T'AILS ANb SPECII,ICATZt'~ ?i 94 ~ ~
2. A box culvert, or ~ c' L~ lq .~i ~ ~
e culverts whe ~ 3R There are multiple rip re one ar ~ `v
more of the i es i9 3d" in diameter or lar er. w w W ~ w ~ r~~~ 1'
~h ~ ~ 1~~11~ . 'lp II • ` .S1 Gsvsl•. JanTf ~j '{SIG . ~ u
o ~ 0 ~ ~ o . N u 41:~•b
` ~ , ~ ~ 1 II
, . ~ _ Q_ ~
5~4 NAP iNVEaT Ta 8E t" N~Gt~f,R ~MAr,?
~i~, V~~"t'i~J AVM 9R"A~tJS.
NOT TO SCALE
Nor ro scA~
E -,~~.....w STEEL RAILING ALONG ALL WALL ~.~....~.n,.~,.~,....'.~...-~~ 5 ~._.~.~,.~..,w.....~~.~.,._..~,~~,.~,~..,~,..~~•,~.~~.~.~ i I
TOPS. SEE DETAIL. ~ t +t t ~j'~''b . 3 3
e HEADWALL. SEE DETAIL. ~ A r i I i
WINGWA E ETAI. ~ ' 3 LL, SE D L ~ ~
3 ~ ~ ~ a.~~,.~,~.~.~..M~ '
4"THICK CONCRETE d~ ~ , ~ m
CHANNEL SIDEWALL I ~ ~ I 4, W WELDED WIRE MESH. ~ I F I 4,. s n ~ ~a ~ ; I g ~
N N ~ ~ ~ 3
6 I k ¢ : ~ I i ~ ! 'a x
. T P V = 4 5 ~ w..~ _.~...~.~.__,u_~...a..~ ~ ,,~..~~..___,.w r ~k HEADWALL 0 ELE . 3 8. ~ ~ $ 3 ~ ~ i p i .,w ~ -a.. ......~3.....>._...,.a,.,...,.....~....._..............e~,....,......_ .........,..wti...~......~...,m......,...e,._......d_......_.~.~J..~w; R~f~'t yF Zku 9 ~ ~ I g Y
~ ~ j ....~w.,~, ~ w,~uw,.. ~ Y ~ i ~I I
i r f ~ , ' i ~ IM..H. ~ p I ?r' y,~` ~ ~ ~ ~ 3 4 1 i J f" I I M1 t Z 4 1
, ,J , i I a - ~
I I F I ,E r' € ~ I i t t ~
(~'~S ~ ~ , ~ A i / ~ " (n ~ 4 ~ A ~ ` ~ t ~ ~ S~ ~ w t• Z o
I I F TyFO ~ I ,.~y~P ~ I " 0 O `M,~~ 8 t'' ~ SHAPE CONCRETE TO PROVIDE I
{ STEEL STEPS ®12 OC, Fk/SRQ ~ s~ 1" DEEP V-NOTCH FOR EACH N N ~ ~ I " ~ ~ 1 5 0 s s
A OF ~ ! EACH SIDE OF 54 RCP, PER ~ G I DRAIN, ALONG ENTIRE 27 I ~ , ~ F I ~ ~ ~
CHANNEL SIDEWALL TOP COQ w NCDOT STANDARD DETAIL 840.66. ~ ~ ~ CHANNEL LENGTH. ELEV. 34L9 j ~ (HEADWALL 47 ONLY, NOT HEADWALL 48.) ~ r' , t' I r ~ W .a ~ K' ~ 1 1~ ~ !
' r~ SIDEWALLS END
3 CHANNEL SPILLWAY - ' { ~ ,f~ ,fr ~ INTO WINGWALLS, ti 1 w I r'~ - i ~ ~ W
r r I ELEV. 340,9 ~ ..w 1 ~ t" I i ~ ~ ~ ~ ( 3 SHAPE CONCRETE TO PROVIDE ~ ; j
I I ~ ~ { ~ - ~ I I ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 1 DEEP V-NOTCH FbR~EACH f.. I ~ ~ ~ DRAIN, ALONG ENTIRE 221 ~ ~
j J ~ ~ ,yl., I ( I I I t ~i i I
, Q ~ J -'3 I ; 1 III N , 3 " I ! 4 THICK X 3 DEEP ,I. nr I j I CHANNEL LENGTH. tf' ; ! I m ~ ~ ~ 3 j ~ ~ ~ ~
~ , i I I ~ I~ CONCRETE KEYWALL. ~ I I s 3 DIA. DRAINS, 'z i ~ r ~ ~ i I ~ i I i ~ f 3 Z
INV. = 335.9 ~ ; j III ~ ! ~i i f ~ i ~ j C i DATE: 4110102
~ . ~ o , ~ w.. I .:~I,el. I , ; I L... , II I ' ~ ~ i i ~ a > 3 f ~ 3 I ~ 1 ~ ~ ~ f ~ ~ j d08 No. 00208
3' ~ ~ I i I r I o~ 4~ I I ~ I I; )I I I CHANNEL KEYWALL BOTTOM z~ ;~a ~ ~ i j
ELEV. 337.9 ~ ; w t ~ I ~ ~ ~ la.. l ~ I i I ( III ~ I"° i ~ ~ ~ ) ~ ~ ~ ~ DRAWING: ~ ~ I g ~ 00.208DETAILS
w I I I I I I ~ I I ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 9 ~ ~w, ~ ~ ~ DESIGNED: S,1B
2• NA" o~ I I , I ~ I , o ~ o.31x I I ~b~ I I ~L. I 1 ~ z! ~ I...I I ~I~ ~ . ~ ~ z ~ ~ ~ , i ! DRAWN:
F.~ s ~ ,y w ~ ~ I~.~ ~ , ~m.4., . , ~ ~ ~.u..~.u_e_._~__._____.._. , ~ ~ ~~__.I , ~ I ~`ti ~ I SJB ~ .w .r.u_. ~ , ~ CHECKED:
CHANNEL FLOOR = 335.9 _ 4 _ ~_~~.~...L,.~. ~ ..._w.~_.~~_,.~~_-_,_-__.I~I..~V._..~~ ,...~__.~a . N.......__~~_...._._,_...~.~w. 1xl.t..._..~rv_. O 3 PVC DRAINS ~m_._.._...______...~..w.... I ~.u.. ~~~~..~..,...~~_.~_.e.~~,.y.~.._ _.~..._M._,~ ,.~._a. ...,~__.._._____._w___. ___r _ ~I I
_ ~ ~...r__. ,._____...._.~..a.__..__a.,~~___.... ~~..~._,_...._._,____...._~n.__._~.~..~..w...,__~._.. _I N~N I ~..~..._.._..ue__._____.___ HORIZONTAL SCALE; ._..~~,.~w. ~_._w...__._...~.,____...u~_...~..~.. ~a_,_ ,..____~...._a ..._......~.._.._...~~....__~_....~.._.~.~_.w~__~.__~.__.~
i ~ , i j NA 1
4"THICK X 3'DEEP '....___i ~ ? _w__._._.. p._.__.~ _...__.~...~_.~a.~..~_.,~.....___..._.,..~____..~.,~..w~.....~..~_..__.~,. '~.w CONCRETE KEYWALL, ~ ~ g' 6' 1' 1 6 VERTICAL SCALE;
1' 18' 1' 181 1' NA
SHEET N0.
~"ru~nv nn?inorrr nue?i?iri 4"THICK CONCRETE CHANNEL
-r mwn wi~~n~i~ ~nnnn« 4"THICK CONCRETE CHANNEL W\ WELDED WIRE MESH. W\ WELDED PARE MESH.
W\ WELDED WIRE MESH.
SECTION "A-A" 4 SECTION B-B 21
NOT TO SCALE
CONCRETE CHANNEL HEADWALL 47 NOT TO SCALE
NOT TO SCALE OF 24

POf~ / DETENTION DETENTION DAM TOP SPILLWAY FLOOR SPILLWAY SPILLWAY ORIflCE ORIFlCE OUTLET PIPE OUTLET PIPE OUTLET PPE OUTLET PIPE OUTLET PIPE RISER 1 VOLUUE DEPTH ELEVATION ELEVATION ELEVATION MOTH DEPTH ELEVATON DIAMETER HIGH INVERT LOW INVERT LENGTH SLOPE RIPRAP ELEVAT LET PIPE RISER TOP RISER CONCRETE SPILL CHANNEL SPILL CHANNEL SPILLWAY ANO SPREADER SPREADER SPREADER SPREADER Z IPRAP ELEVATON DIAMETER RISER ANCHOR LENGTH SLOPE SPREADER RIPRAP ENT, YAO1H DEPTH END YADTH LENGTH ~ _O
POND 1 805 CF 3.0' 355.0 354.0 351,0 3.0' 1.0' J50.4 4,0" 350,4 350,0 40' 1,0X CLASS "A' N/A _Z ISS 'A' N/A N/A N/A 25' 20% 9bIA X 12"TH 10' 0,5' 3' 10'
8'LX5'WX8'TH 5'W X 6'TH LLB W
POND 2 3,880 CF 3.0' 341.0 340.0 337,0 12,0' 1,0' 338,8 4,8" 338,8 338,0 88' 1,0% CLASS 'A' N/A 8'LX5'WX8'TH ISS 'A' N/A N/A N/A 40' 10% 8' DIA. X 10"TH 18' 0,8' 3' 20' W ~ 5'W X 8'TH Z c~ ~O
POND 3 8,599 CF 3.0' 341.0 340.0 337,0 14,0' 1.0' 338.4 3,4" 338.4 338.0 35' 1,0X CLASS 'A' N/A ISS 'A' N/A N/A N/A 40' 10% 8"DIA X 10"TH 18' 0,8' 3' 20' ~ ~
8'L X 5'W X B'iH 5'W X 8'iH Z ~ ~ w U N
POND 4 13,987 CF 4,0' 383,0 381,0 358,0 8.0' 2,0' 355.9 4,4" 355.9 355,0 90' 1,0X CLASS "A' 350.1 B'L X 5'W X 8"TH ISS "A' 380.0 48`CMP 55 CU,FL 80' 10% SPILLWAY - 9'DIA X 12'TH 24' 0,T' 3' 30' ~ 5'W X 8"TN 8'L X B'W X 3'H PIPE - 8'DIA X 10"TH 10' 0,5' 3' 10' ~
PONDS 11,123 CF 3,0' 344.0 3420 339,0 8,0' 2,0' 33&5 4,S' ]38,5 338,1 38' 1.OX CLASS "A' N/A • • SPILLWAY - 6"DIA X 10'TH LL ~ ISS A N/A N/A N/A 80' S%
B'L X 5'W X 8'TH W ~ 5'W X 8'TH PIPE - 8'DIA X 10'1H 10' 0.5' 3' 10' ~ r
N ~ Q
? w c~v "
~N~
n ~ ~ UM U
~ Z. N W Q2m C W tY~~
U ~ 0~~ ° w Z (Jmw ~
Z a~U = Z a~0
U ~ g
Q ~
L._._._. _k.._.a.._.,D ~ ~.~,..N___.~_._._.,
c
i
~ ~ ~i
' ~ ~ ~ 6"DIA, STEEL TRASH RACK TOP RING. a-~
i ~ REBAR 0 8 MAX, SPACING, (TYPICAL.)
/ ~ ; CMP RISER,
~ I.~ I
i
I ~ ~ _~4.w____ »
J - 8 MAX. REBAR SPACING, H
.t ~
'1
~ CMP TRASH RACK BASE RING; i ~ - ~ CUT AN 8" LONG SECTION OF CMP THAT IS 1 1 M-I
6"DIA. LARGER THAN THE RISER DIAMETER. i
.....__...__.~._~__.~~,..._____.a...~.._.._~,_~_._,,..____.___.__~`:~.._.__ yyELD TRASH RACK BASE RING TO CMP RISER FlNISHED GROUND,
WITH FOUR STEEL FLANGES. EXISTING GROUND.
6" SPILLWAY CUT INTO E%ISTINC GROUND.
E~ L,..
~ ti~
- 6 DIA, STEEL TRASH RACK TOP RING. SPIL~WAY 8' YNDE
CONE HEIGHT N1F ~ -i~4 D~~ DAM TOP ELEVATON. - - - ~ - - -
EQUALS RISER w- REBAR ®8" MAX, SPACING. (TYPICAL.) D'w~u,W~w''~Ph RADIUS. I SPILLWAY ELEVATION SPILLWAY DEPTH. SPILLWAY
SPILLWAY ELEVATON, FLARED-END SECnON.
RISER TOPE ~ LEVATION, .I -ALIGN TOP OF CMP TRASH RACK BASE RING
1MTH RISER TOP, 6" I i ~ ( DETEN110N DEPTH d RPRAP AND LEVEL SPREADER AS DETENnON DEPTH, ~ DVOLUMEN 9' SPECIFlED.
~ ~ ~ ~ I ~
~v
i I I ~ FLOOR ELEVATION FLOOR ELEVATION, 15" Dlq,
i ` CMP TRASH RACK BASE RflVOr-° CMP OU nET PIPE
~ ' CUT AN 8" LONG SECTION OF CMP IS I~__,___~CMP RISER~~~ ~ „
~ 6 DIA, LARGER THAN THE RISER DIAMETER. I I
I ° WELD TRASH RACK BASE RING TO CMP RISER OOIICIIEIE ANl-SEA OaIARS rx3'xe~nl
CMP TRASH RACK BASE RING WITH FOUR STEEL FLANGES. STEEL DRIFlCE PLATE. wELD PLATE
TO GP DuTLEr PPE. (ND LFAKffi)
CUT ORIf1CE HOIE NTO PLATE AT DIAMETER AND INVERT ELEVATION
SPEgFlEO,
31 X 3'W X 4'TH CONCRETE PAD BELOW ORIFCE,
rAe99456"Para„ ~0r,.
k~,
C`' n:A ~
c.; ~;,'...tl... r ~ ~ .
~M r~..

Z m
l.~
1
Z4 t4
4., ...'^w.. 4., ~^a,..'^w.....,,
FlNISHED GROUND.
VEGETATED DIVERSION }'C~'. 1RANSITION TO ZERO GRADE Z E>4STINC GROUND. d
STABILIZED SLOPE a
v . 'ti SPILLWAY CUT INTO EXISTING ~ GROUND. U ~ w
J J Z o
0
STABLE UNDISTURBED . , , OUTLET SPILLWAY 8' MADE - YAD1H'~ DAM TOP U)
„ DAM TOP ELEVATION, I--I , I-H DAM TOP ELEVATON, - - - - - - CONICAL TRASH RACK.
SPILLWAY DEPTH SPILLWAY ELEVATION SPILLWAY DEPTH. ~ SPILLWAY ~ SEE DETAIL W SPILLWAY ELEVATON,
2-YEAR STORN VOLUME ~ FLARED-END SECnON.
• . RISER TOP ELEVATION, USER TOP EIEVAnON. a
Gy ~1 ~ RIPRAP AND LEVEL SPREADER AS d OETENnON ~ SPECIFlED. ~
DETENTION DEPTH, DETENnON DEPTH, VOLUME
, f~, a °y/q%% W
LEVEL UP OF SPREADER VARIABLE FLOOR ELEVATION, f/" • m FLOOR ELEVATON, ~ 15 Dl,~ ~ g
MATERIAL STAPLED 01/1~T ~ ~ Z E
IN PLACE DATE: 4(10102
i 3 " ,.o
m JOB N0: CONCRETE ANn-SEEP COLLARS, 00208 3' x 3' z e`nl. DRAWING:
GP RISER, (aAMETER AS SPECIFlED.) 00-208DETAILS
i YA1D OUnET PIPE TO RISER. (NO LEAKS,) DESIGNED: SJB
CONCRETE ANCHOR AS SPECIFlED,
BURIED 8' MINNIUN 15'DIA, GIP. MiELD TO RISER. (NO LEAKS.) DRAWN' SJB
STEEL ORIFICE PLATE. YA1D PLATE CHECKED; 1n 15' dA. GIP PPE. (NO LEAKS.)
CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATIONS CUT ORIFICE HOLE INTO PLATE AT DIAMETER AND INVERT ELEVATON HORIZONTAL SCALE:
1. THE MATDNO SHOULD BE A MINIMUM OF 4-FT. WIDE EIfTENDiNG 8 INCHES OVER THE UP AND BURIED 8 INCHES DEEP IN A VERTICAL TRENCH ON THE LOWER EDGE. THE UPPER EDGE SHOULD BUTT SPEgFlEO. NA
AGAINST SMOOTHLY CUT SOD AND BE SECURELY HELD IN PLACE WITH CLOSELY SPACED HEAVY DUTY WIRE STAPLES AT LEAST 12 INCHES LONQ 31 X 3'W X 4'1H CONCRETE PAD VERTICAL SCALE;
2 ENSURE THAT THE SPREADER UP IS LEVEL. FOR UNIFORM SPREADING OF STORM RUNOFF. 3, CONSTRUCT THE LEVEL SPREADER ON LMIDISTURBED SOIL (NOT ON FILL), BELOW ORIFICE. NA
4. CONS1RUCi A 20-FT. TRANSITION SEC110N FROM THE DIVERSION CHANNEL TO BLEND SMOOTHLY TO THE IMDTH AND DEPTH OF THE SPREADER, SHEET N0.
a D15YER5E RUNOFF FKUM THL SPREADER ACK= A PROPERLY STABILIZED SLOPE NOT TO EXCEED 1OX MAKE SURE THE SLOPE IS SUFFICIENTLY SMOOTH TO KEEP FLOW FROM CONCENTRATING.
6. IMMEDIATELY AFTER ITS CONSTRUCTION, APPROPRIATELY SEED AND MULCH THE ENTIRE DISTURBED AREA OF THE SPREADER. TYPICAL SMA
SMALL DETENTION POND (WITH RISER) I 22
LEVEL SPREADER USE T USE THIS DETAIL FOR DETENTION POND 4.
J OF 24

L ` ' ~ 4 r Y acv g,3~ t, 175
a r , fr T..-. - , , , r~ O ~ , •
F ~ ;r ~ ; ~ - J ~ ~ ,,,.y- ~ a t / 'fy ~~t~ ~ 'SZ4 1 ~.r ~ 'SL w, ~ ti Y - ,
n~.u '"e[e r,, ~ , fi ~ ~ ' - 4 r' tl r.,•
` i x~ - ;r A i i ~ ~ ~ 4f1 its .1 ~,0 111
L [E , " 6 ~ r, a L6E 4 , . r , ~ q ~
J f b ~ ~ r 9S6 t ~ t ) ~ , p / t ~ ~1 • ~ w`° ~ r ; ~ s ~
, r x 1 ' . r ~ > 'ESb .r ~ ~ ~ _ , ~ ~ ~ 'm,~w,~. f ' ~ rf ~ ~ ;
~ 004 , r _ ` ` M'' ~a, , r _ ~ , m_ e r a ~ j ~ i 4 .d. s ~ i 644 w 4 t ti
~ ,y ,t , ; y 1 ' I 6 y,g (r ~ I ' ~ ; 4 n,... 1 ~r "J j 1 ~ ~ 4 e
~ z 'a'te s 0. ,A -t..,. ~ ` 1-~' ~ . . , , ~.r _ ~,,,..w , 1 ~ v r /SY t " 9-'L4 , SSb
dN _ , _ _ "~•~r •t ~ ~ ~ 1 i I E 6 ~ • ~3ld~S lb'~112~3A • ;t~~ ,°,w.. 1 ? ~ 6 'ESb ~ r ~ 6 'S94 1 I , ~ t ~ ~'ILb k.~ 1 1 ~ ~ ` >1
~ l ~ ~ ..4.,.,, L4 _ , ~OOZ = L , , L44 ~ G4 ~ 'x• y 'l+,~t94 ~ - E '854 8 'SSb
~ , ' I ,t I ~ . a ! 'S44 31d~S 1tl1NOZRiOH ,t ' 6 846 , a , ,
~ i , ' _ ~ 1. , % 1 r' 9 '944 r _ b .~r a1 w, ~ J _ S 644 9, ~ 0 ~ ~ 0 • CSvf A, i ~ , . 9b6 g '644 ~ ~ ~ - ~
r SEE ~ ~ ~ _ , i 1R r' ~ ~
Wl ' H ~NMHMO i ,__~.,r e I t w> ~ ~ .F- . °y - ~ , r , I I) ~ t w 2 ~
~ q k a dMf ~a3N~ls3a ~ ~ t _ y~ ~ ~ t a d tita~Ear: ~ 4'cae~.. o eoeE ~ _ p ~ ~ _ ' ~.,....w~.,~• , 0944 I r tiJ
862-00 r~ 6 'eee .w... ~ ~ , . , _ . ~ r j •JNIMtIba ~ - a ~
0 ,cc ~ v! ~ ~ ti , r
~ 80200 ~oN eor ~ . _w~ A ~r , - ,.y ~ `V T ~ L , S , b,
_t ~ 3 r ..,d. ~ ~ ~ ~ w y e , ~ S44 ~ 9 8L6 ~ {
Z y ~gl ;X., . , ' ' t N` ~ 4i r ~ i ? , ~ I \ , , , ti, s ...,d ~ r ~t ~ ~ 'I44 ~ I 4 __e..~. ~ ~ ; Il , t b~ \yd' ~ ~ ~ v
3 e ~ '44e . / ~ i < 4 ' C I 6 '444 f 1~ l ~ 1
i 1 ~ 1 . ' ~ f ~.....,m p r ~
u 1 - , ~ ~ ~ b r ~ -a-..., i H p ~ r 1 ; ,i L N II 1 t ~ f , z 'ebb ~ , y C ~ 11 ~ , r
~ ~ 1 s '44e ~ - , , 1 ~ f` , . e ~ ~ ~ ~ , ~ ~ i r ~ II' ~ f. J,, i
' r r` s '924 , ~ ~ v a , F r,~ ~ w,q ~ ' S '9zb ~ , _ ' ~ 1 . i I ~ iab i ` ~ ~ E 'Eb4 ~ `g. 6 'Ob4 ~ v, ~
m.,..~. ~ i , ..d 1 ~ ! ~ t ~ . ~ ~ ~ r ~ t ~ ~
~ ~ . y ? - r , . e~.. tl~ ,J JAI , 1 1 ~ ~ ! 1 '`m..... ? E ~z ~ i f t m ~ , , ~ ~_n~ ~ ~ , 'BZ4 b~~~1 C1 I~ Ol3Il11tlH tl; ~ I II? i '4, 4'8^y, 1~ ` j 1 s r
° ~ ~ t I f ~ ~ ~ i t , ` .a.., . 9 '826. ~ ~e . I :.f I t , ft
~ o \ } 6 S ~ , . ~ ~ 4.~; ~ ~ ~ , ~ ~ c i ~ ,
f ~ s r, ~ ~ g f i 1i I r ' (I f ~1 1 \ t ~ . , ~ti r eb4
r , ~ , rn i i 6 rt4 ~ d 3 f 11
7 ~ ~ I ~ ~ ~ , n ~ r ~ ~ ~ ~ , ~ ~ , _ f ; r _ , 1 o ' Y r , ~ a ,,f' 8 5t4 ~ ~ ~ i 9 'EZ4 ~ Q 1
~ . ~ / o ~ ~ ~ i - ~ 1 f'~ t t f- I ~r ~ ~ ~ ~ ,,L t~` ~ rte I s 'et', S ,8~ ~ 1, t - l \ f . r E 'L I 1 /
0 i' ti e ~ ' t ~ _ / b ~ I' a , , \ o E 1
i ~ - _ , ~ ~ ~ \ 1.~ i ' lIl~pl ,t a i ~ rt°~ fl 'L t 4 L6E J ~ '224 s E ctb Q ~ zb ~ ~
0 s r~ „ l1 r, 0 U~. f i i ' ~ <
. ^ M- , s ~ ~ na ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ b 'b44 i._,, , ~ ~~~-R v r ~ ~
~iw' ~ ~ . ~ ~ A ~ ~ p ~ L '6B4 l 'EZ6 ~ u ~ ~ E f`'~ P
~ \ 8 ; f/ ~ ~ 4'04 1 \ "°i ~ [Iti/ 11 t i
k - , ~ 1 " , w. - ~ / ~ ti I ` r' ~ ~ ; Q r ( U
, l 1 ` r ~ 9'604 1 f r ~ ~ i \ ~ i' ~ I ~ / 6 'Sd4 1 r / J r~~ r ~ ,a ~ f I
O ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Ix ~ r~~~ e'ca4 ,v ~ ~ ~ ~ y ' ~ y _ ' , ~ r 1 ! ~
f , , ~ , , ' r , , w ~ ~ $N „ , ~ '824 a ~ ~ , E I r i , r- In8 .
~ s c; ~e[4 ~ _ I a, rl r ; d ~ ~ z 1 ~ r I ~ . , w~_ ~ ~ ` e'b , 1 W 1 ri
b '9Z4 ~ Zv f,, ,t ~ • 9 2Z4 ~ I ~ s .
r i , '804 ~ ~ j ; o ' 14 ~ '6 F4 ~ 1''~ S 's6E ; ~ ~ ~ 0 ~ / ~ , ~ ~1 i~~! ,\%~r~ ~ I ~ 9'4[4 E ~r ~ , ,
11 i~ r t4 J~ r E : w..,,w,., I ~ '8Zb - ~ ~ a~ ~ a,,` ~ l ~ I r,w°`~ x„'~ t
1 , ~ i { ` 1 ' I _ ~
r~ , 1 , ~ ~ , i ; a ~ 'e,~ ~'q i 2 ~ ~ ~ w ut r
I Y ~ ' '.l ~ i ; 3 ' n g o y ~ - I I 6 5 ~ `•w , •
d , , F 1 _ i I M-..., - ; , ~ l ~ -~•w,, (l 1 ; tt , I~ ( 16 '9I4 ( , 'yet ~R, . , ;4 i
~ r f L o ~'a i~ 5~^' s ~ . 't04 f ~ V I I i ! ~ t ~..w~_ ~ _o- ~ l• ~ , - a /i ~ r ~ t l ~ \ a - 3 , , ~ t6 ~ % ° v ' ~ t ~
i , , ~ ~ , 4 a ~ ~ 0 t 11 ' '1 ~ 1 ~ ~ ~ , •r. q..
1~ \ ~ \ f w ~ ~ JrE S'"' ~ e ~ ~ .k i ~ E'Ltb ilx II 10 , t ~ ~ If r~ t i~~ ~ ~ y P r
I ! , +ly~ ~ 1~ 1 ~ ~ t r I'I 1 ` ~.s ' S 'i @ tt4 8'[t4 , ' i ~ ,:ro= ~ ( i' !a'S2b •f' 0 ~ r'' , Ii~ ~ ~ ~ 1 r r ~ ,
r-° ~ \ ? II~ t<S'Otb ~ 11 1 ~ ~ l ~ v , . ~ ,
• h • I ~ ~ ~ ~ Lob 0
1 t "W,. e 7 , a"td O r' ~ : , rte".. ' , I t 3
~ ~ ~ 'see l,r, 1 \ ~ _ t . "r.... ~ ! ~ , r' 1 `II ' I I I ~ ~ ! ~ f } F< I~ I ttb J ~ !0 1 1 ! 1 i ~ 013!l11tlH i i 1 ~ ~ 4 ~ ~ L ' r
~V , r~' ti ti.~ r ~ . r, , ,{/i f ! , ~ ~ 5 ~1..~ ~ g ~ ~ 4^~ tb i ~ ~ 6 z06 ~ , ~ ~ I I ~ ~ ~ y I t a ; boo ~ ~ I ~ C-- ~
, _ ~ ~ ~ ~ e., b _ , e i - ` ~ ~r ~k ~1 ~ ~ A ~ d : ~ J r~ ~ S Ot6 J ; I 1 ~ _ , S Zt4 f ~ 1 ' ; L 606 ? ~ ~ 6° ~ E j,~ 1 ~ ,I
`,ti. f' 'f ~ f
o ~ ' t f / 11 ~ ~ ~ s . ~ ,r , t ` ~ L__J ~'st4 d `1 ~ e [ '604 ~ '9Ib t e ~w..J ~ `g d J i I ~ , r ! Y
/ , % Y 1 , / ~ ~ / ° , M 1 t' 1 j _ 'Et6 's ~rJ R 1, ; ~ , ~ } 'boo E
e a i ~ \ ~ `6 ! J,_ I 'mob , ° L 40b tw r F - , ~ S '604 '4-.. ~ ~ ~
1 t i` d r 1 Via. .t \ I ,t t> y
' ~ ~ i ~ O~t;~ ~ i/. .d ~ ~y ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ X004 ~ s ~ ~ i `t ~ . . ~ a _ .r 1 , , y "
, ~ ' £ 1 r ! J 1 z' _ ~ t .I . ~ 3 'OI ~ I I m.~ f J ~ 1 4 ~ t ~ :,_...f e' 't 1 ~ st ` 1 E / ~ / ,
, ~ f e6e _ . r ~ , ,
~ , , I E # ~ ~ i ~ I' , . a~ ~ ~ 'cob ~ tl3atl , ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ( ~ _ ° E ,L
s ~ . i . '08Et .1 i .d r ~ 6 '6bE r ~ L 906 • < ~ ~ ~ ~ _ ~
' , ~w ~ • - ~ , ~ '
r ~ ~ J . ~ ~ ~ ~ { ~'T , ~ b '9bE ;i ~ ' 9 'ao4 ~ - ,9 cbE , , ~ / on ~ I 1 J 3b i, g ,
- . r , t ~ ~ 1 . ~ , 7 ~ ~ f u'98 t ~'''bliE", a'66E ,.k.%' i ~ ~ ~ f''Otbf j ~ r a `4 bar i z
; t 1 ~ ~ t ` ice: ~ ~ ' %r ' i ~~~v f N ''`ti ~ iii,, i+^ + ~ .~f : 1 "i. ~ 'S8 j ~ 1 , , ` •
1 l r' 1 1 J f ~ ~ ~ 1, ~ I I ~ ~ ~ ~ sari ~ , ~ z i ~ ~ 1
i E / \ ~ ~ELE ~ , r. ~ ~ ' ~ ~ , ~
. i ~ ~ ~r ' v i ~ l i , lr 1. { e ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ f-.
1 ~ 'l r 1 ~ ~ j' f i I
r , i ~ 'LYE / 1 r ~ j ~ . t ~ ~ I t 1 y l t . ~ i , , ~ 1 _ / lA, i J -
s r \ , 1
I , / ~ ~ ~ . ; ~ ~ , ! d ` ~ t r ,
I ~ i ~ 11 ~ ! - ~ 1 ~ / ~ / a
~ 1.., 1 r ~ ~ F p ' \ - , ~ ;
H ' ~ . , t ~ / / ~ ~ , , , ~ G ' ~ ,1 ~ a 9 3 ~ r
r , Y 9 ~ y ~-r ' w € x
I i ~'I e ~ < P E w ~ ~ -6-9L~ , . ~ r f , ~ ~ 1-'r J i ~ - ~ r _ s' , ; . ' ~ ~,w._ _
H , _ a_ 4~1 r =
- ~ ~ ~ q ' _..r~..~ ~ 9LE ~ ~ ~ - ~ P t r 1~ ` { ~ _
l , , . w , ~ . ,s ~ I s , 1 ~ ....m
y y i o, y, r~< , , 6 6'8tE 4 ~ .•~..~,,..~,_w, i ,
~ I ' ~ , ~ / ~ ~ f l f ~ , i x ~ ~ , ' ~ b ~"ti e J E S ` r i f
, . ~~M, g'~&~~ y ..._.i s a bz i ~ _ _ , ,
~ , 4'COe _ . ~ ~ ~ ~ ,11,E ~ I / ~ , ~ ~ r' a rr ~ ~ ~ ~ f 'y , J I i \ i r J i t r
t , r , ~ I ~i , - i : ~ f J r y/ ~ / ~ ~ ~ r
,l 4 ~ ~ ` ~~~:y I ~ i `Ire} ~.,,w b 'oze •.x ` 1 , ~ s l ' ~ r' - r
< x ~ , ~ . / ~
_ ~ ~ ; 1 \ ('°•r, n G o ~ ~ r h ~ . ~ , . J _ - .W,•r 3 I t 9 ' ^ C2a' r ~ ° ~
~ , ~ ~ ~ ~r m O n 1 ~ X, . 1 - ~ ti , A 2 i i ~ , ~ e s ~ M , sE y / .,,E • ° ' t
m ~ 0 ~ rn , , w ~ ~ ~ ~.~,..~.r ~ f t ~ ti, rn n ~ ~ f ~ , t x , , e 1 ! , ~ ~
/ i x ~ p a ._.M- i 1 , , _ ~ ' , ,
T_ - o Z R1 n. r ~ `r, " f ~ _ ~ ~ lP l~ „F , , ~ ,y { j / j t ~ ; ` - r =
. r i. ' ~ - . i { ~
Jay %"r ' ~ , , .i t t ^ ~ a r t r t ,
Q , x ° ~ ~ , ~ w 1 M ~ ~ ~ ~ i . r~
~ m z D Z ~ ` iji k5.~ ~i , ~ ~ i ' , r a ~ i ; l .
TT ` ~ , / N o mN~,, j a` w~ r, , r r • , , i ar ~ aP ja'E9E ~ • 1 ` a_
iV ~ ° . , ~~1 D z.• I ,~.u.y, I I y j , _ , ~
~ _ ~ ' ~ ~ 4 80f. w~~ ~t x L a`$ ? F `
II ( ~ ~ A: r , ' 1 1 e ~ 1 ~ 'A ~..w<s 7 ~ _ :J - \ rte, ~
l I. 1 l? ,~o~e t e' Ire r t 1 n
spy- ~d g t t
{ \ f ! 1.
.,,.w. ' Q } ll
t

I ~ i
TM 775-01-007 I I I I ae TM 775-01-0070 I e~p p I ~ PIN 0814-04`-74-7431.
CURVE rnBLE PIN 0814-04-83-2544 I I { I s~ STATE OF NORTH. CAROLINA '
CURVE LENGTH RADIUS ` DIRECTION CHORD LOT 3 I I I I- _ C1 261,86 976.16 S1T4745 W 261.08 PB 14/90 I I_- '~'~e DB 1465/698 v ~ ~
C2 50,70 976,16 saa•3T23"w 50,69 CAROLYN JANE BROWI SMITH I ~ 1 ZONING; R-20 ~ r ~ x~ ~ ~ w 2
C3 551,68 976,16 544,37 I ~ sosro3l E DB 2817/601 , \ E-B WATERSHED ~ 1 , ~ ~
C4 72,63 1004,14 S22'35'17"E 72.61 ZONING: R-20 I ~ ~ VACANT ~ Z w
4 7 1st2.5t " 241.91 E-B WATERSHED I C5 2 2.0 S29 3 4 E I' VACANT I Q 3 ~ n 11 ~ ~ ~ ~
3 ~ m cn a CONTROL ~ 0 0
- 12 7,08' i S 1\ CORNER .TM 775-01-019 Z W 2 ~ a
„ I • , . 1 PIN 0814 04 74 9844 ° ~ , LL o
I , 1 STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA o ~ > N
I , 1 W ~ v 1 D~ 435-673 J~ ~ z ~ o
, - 1 LbT 1 -J Q 2~. N a Q , , , 1 PB 87-57 ~ ~ ~ ~
~ „ U W Ora m ~ _ ~ ~O. P 87-66 W ~ o
~ ~ , . ~ ~ ~ P ~ ' 1~'c Z NING• R-20 ~ ~ m W ~
, ~ , . , 1' - ~ 0 t,,~, 6 E B WATERSHED ~ o
, , e• , , 1 2 ~J V CANT ~ _ >
~ ~s , ~ w Q ; ~ 1~
TM 775-01-014 0 ~ 1~ ',a,' 19 2
PIN 0814-04-83-4861 3
WILLIAM G. SCO at o ' ~ ~ wife GLADYS H, N n ~ a ' ~ ~ ~ 1 ~
^o ~ ~ DB 1166 613 n M ~ ~ / n 1 1 ~d'p, t~ cr
ti ~ 2 ~ PB 1~3-25 ~ ~ ~ 1 I 1 1
ZONING: R-20 ~ 3 ~ I 1
J~ 1 E-~ WATERSHED o I, 1 I I` I
RESIDENTIAL USE I , I , , I WQODS
I I I I
WOODS I 1 I I' H I 1
, I 1 50 STREAM SUFFER ,;r , 1 SEE NOTE G .
I' ' / I! 1` t I' , r~
~ . ~ " V1 l ' 1 N30'35 40 W
1 ? ~ ' 1 1 20.25' \ \
~ 1 1 \ 1 H
\ CONTROL \ ~ , , . \ CORNER _ I-I
- - 1 1 ~ \ y' ~ 1. '
1 \ 1 I-I
LOT- A 1 . , \ ~ 1 \ 1
2 \ 7.41 ACRES . • \ ~ 1 H
PB 15 -25 _ . EX. MANHOLE RIM ELEV.: 362,86 OLE ; 1 l.: 362.86 A 1
INV. IN ELEV,: 353,34 :LEV.: 353.34 , , 1 NOTE:
III. OUT ELEV.: 353,14, ~ 1 ~ V ELEV.: 353.14 ~ STATE AND FEDERAL PERMIT AJTHORIZATION r l . , r,,, ,.,~,,..r,.,',",..,,,,,.
/ \ 1 MAY BE REQUIRED FROM THE DEHNR AND • ORP ER 1
/ / / / , .r,., 1 1'iiE COMMENCEMENT OF ANY LAND DISTURBING • 126.68' OF " " ~ ~ " ' -
~t\ ~ 126.68 OF \ \ / r EXISTING BUILDINGS 8 SS 0 0. 1 ACTIVITIES ~N OR NEAR A LAKE, STREAM, 8" SS 0 0.6891 , , , , , , , 1 CREEK, TRIBUTARY OR ANY UNNAMED BODI'
i / ~ / 17 TO BE REMOVED \ , , 1 OF WATERS AN ITS ADJACENT WETLANDS. ~ D
i ~ 1 ` F--I
\ ~ ~
r / E I T~ l I I / / R EX. MANHOLE RIM ELEV.: 360.87 - ~ r~
I I l l II „ V1 INV. IN ELEV.: 352.2 ; \
3 / / II + I I EXISTING DRIVEWAY / INV. OUT ELEV,: 352.24' , , 1 H 1 1 1 ,
o ' I I ~1 ~ TO BE REMOVED / j l N I 1 1 ' ~
226.48 OF 1 M , , 1 8 SS 0 5.50X ~ 1
r 1 ~ _ ~ _ 11, 1 1 1 EXISTING BUILDING ~ 1 I ` , ~ \
I I TO BE REMOVED ~ ~ EXISTING BUILDINGS TM 775-01-01 ~B 11 ~ I I c\ 1 ' ` \ 30 CITY OF DURHAM ~ \ T ` \ SANITARY SEWER EASEMEN .
TO BE REMOVED PIPJ 0814-04-~~3-1444 1 1 1 I 1 1 I~'~ r I ` \ PB 150-133 `
1 l I I 1 /l ` I B~_'RNARD F, WARREN JR I I I I I ~ l ` ~ \ SEE NOTE E ` ~ ( \ \ EX. MANHOLE •
J ~ . & DENISE SCOTT 1 ~ I I ? I ~ / I ! I i ter : _ R1M ELEV.: 348.88
DB 143$/754 1 I 1 1 IIVV. IN ELEV.: 339.7~Q 1 ~ t ~ INV. IN ELEV.: 339.78 ~ ; • • ~ I
PB 1i7 62 ~ EXISTING / / I r~ / DRIVEWAY ~ ` I / 1 ' INV. OUT ELEV.: 339.68 \ I
ZO~~ING: R-20 ~ TO BE RETAINED 1 1 ti ~l 1 v I E~~ ~ I 56M ~.1 \ I z
E-B WATERSHED 1 1 ` 1 _ 1 XI TING ~ 1 RF_SID~w fIAL USE / E s ! 241.46 OF EP " ~ g3 r'f ~ I N coo
/ ! DRIVEWAYS I 1 / ! TO BE REMOVED I 1 EX. MANHOL 8 SS 00.6796 56'x' G~ ~ \ ~ ~ ~,IC 50' P ~ _ ` ~ I I cn so
. ! II RIM ELEV. , EX. MANHOLE Q~9 01 ~ \ I ~ RIM ELEV.. 358.84 P r ~j ~ ` I I pD' N* I u
/ ! ! INV. IN ELE INV. IN ELEYI,; 341.43 rr ~ I ` I ``\~~~~il rrrr~h,
1 ! 1 1 ~ INV, OUT EL I! 1 INV. OUT ELEV.: 341,3 \ 1 I ',',y', J ~ ~~'i ~ ~ ~ ~
I1 11 ! 1 ! 1 STEEP SLOPE 1 I ~ 1 ~ ~ 9 ; I ~
1 1 ! I AREA C5 ! _ 1fl,400 SF ~ ~ ~ 1 ~ i ;,r ~ = SEAL -
C4 AIR/VAZrUUM ~ H ~ . 50 CITY OF DURHAM 1 ~ ~ 15456 ' a;; rMAN OLE . '
- -------------l-L-- W/MANHOLE . . SANITARY SEWER EASEMENT. 1 1 '.,',',~,'y' 1 i . PB 150-133 1 ~ , 1 .
I G '`i~ SEE NOTE D 1`' ~,S
SSr ~ G ----1-- G Rf ~ G G _L_- c~ ~ i~4?1 EXISTIN ~ J VENT ~ ~ i ~ ( 1 li 1 , ~~i W, P i 253,42 OF 1 ~ 1 ~~rrrnnln~~~
i EXISTING " SS 0 0.4596. $ ` ~'~~r'~~~1' 1 '
w _ \ W ~ 4 DIP ' , w ' / i~ 8 1 ~ 1 ~i 12 GRAVEL ~ IN~ ..Y.'.'.' 1 i a ACCESS ROAD 1 „
3 , , • m_.._ FORCE ii ~ :rya \ W ry, ~ ~ 60' CITY OF DURHAM 1 ~ \ 2 P ','n;',', 1
~ 1 r MAIN ii ti _~~h PERM`ANENT R/W DEPT. OF TRANSPORTATION 1 - W ' ~ ~ . 323.03 ~ ~ ' i~ , ~ ` / 8" SS ®'0:5676. ~i ~ SANITARY SEWER EASEMENT. ~ 1y1~ 1 . 1 m ~ ~ i PB 150-133 14?1\ 1: w J
R W SUBJECT 1'0 MONUMENTATION BY NCDOT I ~ ~ ~ ` ' ' ~ ~ , _ DB 2869-870 DB 2$134-39 l l ' I ~ ii i ~ SEE NOTE "F" ``1 1~ 11 1 1
' ~ W EX. MANHOLE' 1 / I I I \ RIM ELEV.: 349,59 iii i~ 1 ~?1 ~ ~'N•' 1
` ~ \ i ' ' ~ W ~ ~ ~ ~ INV, IN .ELEV.: 343,26 , EX. MANHOLE ~ 1'11 1 : ; ; . rp; ' 1 ; PROPERTY LINE TO BI REMOVED A~ RIM ELEV,: 348.84 \ 1~ ~ ~ 1 1 3 w
. ~ 11 I 1 ~ ~ ~ ~ 1.1~ INV, .OUT ELEV.: 343.2 ii i b 1 / ` ~ ~a / ,~j F R IMINARY PLAT ~~i 9o L~ ! 1 1 1'~y, w 5 (SE.. P EL ) F INV. IN ELEV.: 338.53. k ~ , 1 w
~ / I I I ~ F f ~ { ~ ~ ~ / I I ~ i I ~ I EX, FIRE ^ ' • ls, qS ~ ~ i~ ~ ys' R V. OUT ELEV.: 338, 1'. ~ 1 6 ~ ~
n 111 I~ 1 ~ HYDRANT F W Aq ~/NF 4+ ~ , F~?N ~ 1 1 ti o a I- F EX. PUMP ~ } Q
~ i I C ~ ?A , / I r I I 1 1 1 / ~ Nj F a T 1 1 a~ J STATION ~ 1 1 ~ Q a
/ 1 I ~ ! ! ~ ! ! Wq ~ ~4 _ ~ 2" OOPPER A 1 ~ ai Z
~ ~ ~\~1 ~ ~ ~1 M ~n'~9/ . ,i POTABLE WATERLINE ! ! v glry ~ ~ ~h , ~ TO BE RELOCAT~F3.. TERLINE LOT 2 ~A ! 1 \ ~ w - ~ z o ~ Q ~AT~F3.. ~ ` - 2.93 ACRES ~ 4 \ ~
~ / ~ ! ~ 1 1 ~ ~ ~ ~ i 0 1 \ Q w z • \ ~
~ ~ / ~ ~ .1 l~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ? RPZ BACK. LOW _ ~ \ \ 1 1 ~ ~ i •PREVEN?ION ~ ~ ~ ~ ~cKFLOw' PB 87-57 ,.1 - I?ION ~ ~'1 ~~1 ~ - a ~
\ d ~ ~ \ ~ 1 Q ~ ~ ~ ASSEMBLI' 1 1 ` > w 3LY WOODS 1 1 1 W ~
~~l 1 ~ ~ i TO BE RELOCATED SITE DATA ~ ^ t ~ I ~ I 1 +a~ ~ RELOCATED 1 1 1 1 a 1 \ ~ ~ 1
TAX MAP: 775-01-015 PIN: 0814-04-84-7223 ~ ~ ~ 8 ~ ~ c " l Zt~ ~ s 2 .WATER 1TER . 1 1 •w \ ~
TAX MAP: 775 01 018 PIN: 0814 04 84 8730 ~ c / , ~ ~ ~ Fq ~ ti,ET'E}Z ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~l' ~ S i TOTAL AREA: LOT A: 27.41 ACRES I / ~ ~ ~ 0 9E RELOCATED t ~ 1 .0~ , \ w \ \ RELOCATED 1 1 ` ~ N ~
~ / ~ / ~ AFB LOT 2: 2.93 ACRES ~i ~ I I ~ \ S~Fy i' 1 r~ \
/ ~ r TOTAL: 30,34 ACRES (1,321,649 SF) _ - ~ / / ~ ~ \ EXISiiNG 1' 1 , ~
I ~ ~ ~ ZONING: R 20 / b ~ ~ DRIVEWAY ~ ~ EXISIING 1 w
TE E / \ \ ~ ~ WA RSH D DISTRICT: E-B WATERSHED ~ ~ ~ ~ INSIDE CITY LIMITS, INSIDE UGA ~ / /t ~ ~ ' i1 TO BE REMO 1 TRAILER ~ ~ ~ N vu \ ~ TO BE REMOVED ~
CURRENT USE: RESIDENTIAL ` \ ~ z
I ~ ~ Ci --fir J IMPERVIOUS SURFACE MAY NOT EXCEED 246 OF LOT AREA, ~ ~ \ i . \ / ~ DATE: J ~ ~i a• 8!01!01 . . '
EXISTING IMPERVIOUS SURFACE: 34 251 SF 2.59 / ~ ~ ,i JOB NO: 00208 .~y Jam. ~ - ~ '
NOTE "A" \ / i~ ' \ ,,~a DRAWING.
SEE PLAT "PROPERTY SURVEYED FOR THE MANSON COMPANY, INC,' BY /L \ ' ~ NPAT / ~ WIWAM H. McCARTHY, JR„ PLS, DATED 4/6/01, RECORDED I L / \ , , 00-208 ~ ' ` S.
BOOK 153, PAGE 25. / ~ , , , , / \ ' ' ' ' ~ ' ~ry DESIGNED: JWP \1 ~
NOTE B NOTE 'F" / \ V ~ , ~ ~ DRAWN: LMH ~
SEE PLAT "PROPERTY SURVEYED FOR W.Y, MANSON do WIFE, PATRICIA g0 FOOT WIDE CITY OF DURHAM ACCESS ROAD k SANITARY SEWER / \ \ ` ' 0"E \ $35'~ 0 CHECKED:
" Y WAT EY PL DATED 3 3 78 RECORDED \ \ SCOTT MANSON B J, TS COPL S, / / EASEMENT. SUBJECT TO TERMS STATED IN THE DECLARATION IN REAL ~ / ~ , ~ \ PLAT BOOK 87, PAGE 57. ESTATE BOOK 1510, PAGE 958. NO STRUCTURES, FlLL, EMBANKMENT'S, / \ ~ EXISTNG HUB . v 295.17 & TACK V ~ HORIZONTAL SCALE:
TREES OR OBSTRUC110NS PERMITTED WITHIN THE EASEMENT EXCEPT / \ v PROPERTY SURVEYED FOR \ ~ 1"=60'
NOTE 'C" ACCORDING TO THESE TERMS, / \ \ SEE PLAT "PROPERTY SURVEYED FOR JOHN L, SCO1T do SADIE J, SCOTT \ \ ' \ \ \ \ VERTICAL SCALE:
ESTATE" BY CULBRETH ENgNEER, DATED 4/22/42, RECORDED IN PLAT NOTE "G" \ \ \ \ \ ` ` NA \ \ ` \
R ' H1 UNDI TUBBED STREAM BUFFER EACH SIDE OF \ \ BOOK 14, PAGE 90. STREAM BUFFE . 50 DE S \ \ STREAM, MEASURED FROM TOP OF BANK, NO CLEARING OR GRADING / \ ` ` SHEET N0.
nTUra rasa m renur ruiuwur. sun naniueav ueiureNeucv nc \
NOTE "D" EXISTING VEGETATION PERMITTED,
50 FOOT WIDE CITY OF DURHAM ACCESS ROAD k SANITARY SEWER SYMBOL LEGEND EASEMENT. SUBJECT TO TERMS STATED IN THE DECLARATION IN REAL *H" DURHAM OUTSIDE TWP., DURHAM CO., NORTH CAROLINA
CONTOUR LINES TAKEN FROM CITY OF DURHAM TOPOGRAPHIC MAP. EXISTING CONCRETE MONUMENT ESTATE BOOK 1510, PAGE 958. NO STRUCTURES, FILL, EMBANKMENTS, NOTE TREES OR OBSTRUCTIONS PERMITTED WITHIN THE EASEMENT EXCEPT FIELD WORK PERFORMED NOVEMBER 27, 2000
ACCORDING TO THESE TERMS. NOTE "J" EXISTING IRON PIN
SCALE 1" = 60' PROPERTY AS DESCRIBED IN DEED BOOKS 932-319, 3037-575, 396-82
NOTE "E" ALL DISTANCES ARE HORIZONTAL GROUND AND AREA BY COORDINATE COMPUTATION. SEWER MANHOLE , 30 FOOT WIDE CITY OF DURHAM SANITARY SEWER EASEMENT. SUBJECT
TO TERMS STATED IN THE DECLARATION IN REAL ESTATE BOOK 1510, NOTE "K" FIRE HYDRANT PAGE 958, NO STRUCTURES, FILL, EMBANKMENTS, TREES OF THIS PROPERTY IS LOCATED IN ZONE X OUTSIDE 500 YEAR FLOODPLAIN. 60' 0 60' 120' STANDING IN THE NAME OF
OBSTRUCTIONS PERMITTED WITHIN THE EASEMENT EXCEPT ACCORDING TO AS DEFINED BY FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP #3706300058G, ® PUMP STATION W. Y. MANSON & WIFE AND THE MANSON COMPANY, INC. OF 5
THESE TERMS. 3706300054G, DATED 2/2/96.
T

I ~
i
TM 775-01-007 I I I I aB TM 775-01-007C" I 6~ A
CURVE TABLE PIN 0814-04-83-2544 I I I ~ PIN 0814-04=74-7431` I s~ STATE ~F NORTH CAROLINA
CURVE LENGTH RADIUS ! DIRECTION CHORD LOT 3 I I , I I- - C1 261.86 976.16 S17 47 45 W 261.08 PB 14/90 I I--- DB 1465 698
C2 50.70 97s.1s so6'3 '23"w 5a.s9 CAROLYN JANE BROWI SMITH I \ ~ ~ ZONING: R-20 , ~ ~
C3 551.68 976.16 S09'03'19"E 544.37 DB 2817 601 I / ~ E-B WATERSHED Lu ? \ ~ ~
C4 72.63 1004,14 S22'35'17"E 72.61 ZONING: R-20 I \ VACANT r ~ Z W \ 3 > ~
" E-B WATERSHED I C5 242.07 1912.51 S29 35 42 E 241.91 I . Q c>; N
VACANT ~ I 3 ~ m ~ o it , , , " , • CONTROL ~ 0
1 7.08' S; - 2 I ~ ,'.i \ CORNER ..TM 775-01-019 Z w z w ,ii O
`n ~ X i i „ u , i ~ \ „ PIN 0814-04-74-9844 S \ G ~ J uia 0
I , I \ STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA G s ~S N 1 L1J ~ m
DB 435-673 ~ ~ a ~ ~ ~ 1 J ~ ~ZN p
1 LQT 1 Q z a Q=~
~ . PB 87 57 w o ~ a ~ U w ~0~
I y PB 87-66 O ~ 'o ZONING• R-20 ? ~ o W ~
~ , , Ic - WAT R H D ~ ~ ~ E B ESE J o
, .6 z ;y VACANT w ~ _ >
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ y , , ~
TM 775-01-U14 ~ ~ ~ o , 1 ~
PIN 0814-04-83-4861 3 f 2 ~ ~ , 1~ ~ ~ ~
?MLLIAM G. SCOTT x p ~ ~ ~ wife GLAOYS H. N n ? a ~z$ ',•r ~ 1 ~
o a' ~ DB 11 6 613 ~ M ~ ~ 6/ ~ \ 1 ~~o.'.
y 2 1 PB 153-25 ~ \ 1 1
e~ ~ ZONING: R-20 ~ 3 ~ \ 1 \ !
~ E-B WATERSHED o I' 1 , I
RESIDENTIAL USE I 1 I WOODS I
I 1 1' 1
WOODS I ` I` I H
I „ \ ' 1 \ 50 STREAM SUFFER , , \ SEE NOTE G ,
I' li 1 , f', r H
~ l ~J \ ~ I 1 N30'35'40"W
~ / \ \ , \ _ 20.25
1 _ 1 \ \ . \ H 1 ~ CONTROL
- , \ \ CORNER I-I
\ `
~ i \ ~ ~i
_ LOT A \ ~ i' \
27.:41 ACRES \ \ , ~ , ~ i' i' \
PB 1.5.3-25 _ H EX. MAN OLE H
RIM ELEV.: 362.86 , INV. IN ELEV.: 353.34 V• .6 ~ 1 LE , 362 8 ~ 4 „ 1 N ELEV,: 353.3 ! \ NOTE: ~
~ IN1f, OUT ELEV.: 353. )UT ELEV,: 353.14 \ ~ STATE AND FEDERAL PERMIT AJTHORI2{~TION r ~ , U
/ ~ \ `.J „ , , „ 1 THE Ci.S. CORPS OF ENGINEERS PRIOR TO ,
/ / / ~ . „ \ - ~ 8 , liiE COMMENCEMENT OF A AND UISTUR ,
t ` 126.68' ~ / r r, EXISTING BUILDINGS 8" SS Q 126,68' OF ' ' ' ' ' ' 1 ACTIVITIES N OR NEAR A LAKE, STREAM, 8" SS 0 0.68X , , , \ CREEK TRI TARP OR ANY UNNAMED BOD'i'
i / ~ / ~ / ~ TO BE REMOVED \ c ~ OF WATERS ANp ITS ADJACENT WETLANDS,
i ~ / I i / Z ~ t ~ ~ , , , ` H-I
~ , ~ ~ ` , `
rT.l ~ l I ' I ` / ~ / EX. MANHOLE RIM ELEV.: 360.87 ~
/ / ,i / / / i~ / / INV, IN ELEV.: 352.2 ; ~ ~ ~ \
3 / / EXISTING DRIVEWAY / INV, OUT ELEV.: 352.2 1 \ ~ 1 \
o ' J I r1 TO BE REMOVED j l l/ II If ~ i ~ l 1 „ 1 \ \
o~ ~ / ~ / ~ ~ J 226.48 OF \ ~ 8" SS 0 5.50% t , , , ~ \
/ / 1 I I I EXISTING BUILDING / ` , , ~ `
_ _ / I TO BE REMOVED / ~ ~ EXISTING BUILDINGS TM 775 01 01 ~8 / / y I I c\ .Y / 30' CITY OF DURHAM ` ` ~ ~
/ TO BE REMOVED PIPJ 0814-04-93-1444 / l 1 I I i I~'~ r SANITARY SEWER EASEMENT, ~ P 1 0-133 ` ` B 5 „ `
I I ~ / B?_'RNARD F. WARREN JR / I I I I ~ / ~ SEE NOTE "E" , ~
& IIENL`aE_ S~1TT J~ I I 1 1 M E~~V,: 348.88 ~ ~ \
DB S8/ 5 , I I I 'EXISTING / / I r~ INV, IN ELEV.: 339,79 ~ ~ - \ I
PB 117/62 DRIVEWAY / _ ~ 1 I r INV. IN ELEV.: 339J8 \ , , INV, OUT ELEV,: 339,68 ~ , , I ~ , , I
ZO~~ING. 20 ~ TO BE RETAINED J J ~ ~l l ~E~ , , I
E-B WATERSHED ; / J ~ J - - RFSIDE~dTIAL USE r / EXISTING ~ J 241.48 OF EPS~ i'1 ~ I ~ " ,~R ~~3 ~'f ~ ~ I cn co
J J DRIVEWAYS I I 8 SS 0 0,67% SE QG• ~ ~ I car
J J TO BE REMOVED I J EX. MANE II RIM ELEV EX. MANHOLE ~01,~C 15G' ' ~~1 I ~ co RIM ELEV.: 58.84 P P~ % I I ~ N,
• J J I I INV. IN E JJ II / i /i ~ ~ I VIII I I I I I III INV, IN ELEV. 341,43 ~ I I ~ ~~h I ~ ~i
r J I INV. OUT INV, OUT @LEV,: 341.3 ~ 1 1 ~ ~i ~ ~ \ I • ~
II r1 r I ! I STEEP SLOPE ` ~ I ~ .,y ~ ~ \ I ~
I J J I AREA C5 I 1, F ~ 1 1 ~ ,I \ - SEAL
C4 {1,400 S AIR/VACUUM - ~ r ~ .AIR VACUUM ` ~ \ ~ \ \ / 50 CITY OF DURHAM 1 \ ~ 15456
W/MANHOLE. 7 / r ~ W/MANHOLE . /r, SANITARY SEWER EASEMENT. \ ~ ~ , , 1
/ I ~ G q ~ ~--s _-1---~-------------- G Rfg PB 150-133 \ 1 \ 1' t~ ~ ' i / (SEE NOTE D ~i s
Sr EXISTIN G G 1- - _ G' ~ ,4213 ~ i 253,42 OF 1 ~ 1 ~ ~~rrilltlin~~~
~ VENT i ~ i EXISTING 8" SS 0 0.45X ~ ` , ~ 1
----------------------~---r---- ~ ~ 4" DIP ~ ~i W W C3 • , w. FORCE ,r i/ ~ ~ 12' GRAVEL \ ~ \ 1 i / 1 a ~ 1
-------r- - i W ' I . MAIN ~ i ~ ry~ ACCESS ROAD \ 1~ . 2 p~ 1 i 60 CITY OF DURHAM STUB1~ ~ 1~ I 2 2
/W DEPT. OF TRANSPORTATION 1 W 323A~3 OF ~i~ , \ ERMANENT R _ ~ ~ ~i SANITARY SEWER EASEMENT, \y1, 1 m ~ ~ i PB 150-133 1; 1 J ~
R/W SUBJECT 1`0 MONUMENTATION BY NCDOT / BASS 0 .58X i~ i - - DB 2869-870 DB 284-39 11 1 W ~ ~ iii i ~ , (SEE NOTE F `1 \ ; b 1
/ P EX. MANHOLE" ~ 1 - ~ - / / I ' I I ~ \ RIM ELEV.: 349.59 iii /i ~ \0~ ~ EX19,TI 1 .1
~ °,1 ~ ~ ENHR ~ 4 3 EX. MANHOLE 1 1 ; ' ,10,'~~,
I W ~ ~ ~ INV. IN ELEV.: 343.26 ~ ~ I ~ ~ ~ ~ INV.:OUT ELEV.: 343.2 ii i a PROPERTY LINE TO BE REMOVED A~ V' 4 . 4 \ ~ 1 1 3 w RIM ELE 3 6 8 1 \ , g w 5 (SEF PRELIMINARY PLAT) 9o INV. IN ELEV,: 338.53: Lek + 1 ~ ; , ;y~?', . ~ - w
~ I I I F F / it ~ ~9, ~CIV. OUT ELEV,: 338.4li! 1 5 p. w 1 ~t',' 'S z
Il 1' ~ EX. FIRE F W s A S(/ ~ ~ ~ ~ n ~ I ~ HYDRANT q HF ~`A, ~ i F '~~ti ~ ~ ~ 1 g ~ ~ F EX, PUMP ~ Q
~ ~ ~ ~ I_ . c ~,o i r ~ 1 1 a ~ ~ STATION ~ 1 ' ' • ' 1 it Q a
/ I ` ! I ( ! I r J r Wq ~ ~ ~~~`pR... i 2" COPPER 1 ' •1 U .R LOT 2 A, , , ~ W Z
C ~ l~ I 1 I I 1 ~R ~ ~ ~CF i , / t,,~l ~ 1J Mqh~ ~\M9i _ ~i _ POTAt3LE ~9ATERUINE WATER~INE x 1 , , - ~ A 'Jj, ~ '..1 ~ Z o~ Q .LGC T~@ 2.93 ACRES , \ 0 J z
~ c l ~ . ~ ~ ~ r I ~ /h ~ ~ i ~ ° : TO BE RELCCAT'E@ / r J JI GU , .
~ J ~ I ~l 8 ~ ` ~ v, c? ~ RPZ BACKFLOW _ \ \ 1 J ~ i •PREVEN?ION . ~ ~ a BACk~ Low PB 87-57 ~ ~ ~ ~ VEN?ION 1 ~ - D_ ~
~ ~ 1 ''1 ~ ty ~ i ~ / . ~ I ~ ~ ASSEMBLI' EMBLY 'WOODS ~ ~ 1 ~ w
~ 1 ~ ~ i TO BE RELOCATED SITE DATA n n t ) I ~ I I A~ ~ BE RELOCATED 1 ~ 1 W ~ \ ~ i ~
TAX MAP: 775-01-015 PIN: 0814-04-84-7223 ~ ~ J 8 ~ ~ " ~ ~ ~ Zl~ ~ s 2 ,WATER ,WATER \ a
TAX MAP: 775 01-018 PIN: 0814 04 84 8730 ~ ~ / ~ ~ 1p / ~ coq F ME1~ER TOTAL AREA: LOT A: 27.41 ACRES I / ~ 9 ~ 0 9E RELOCATED ,DER ~ ~ \ I- BE"RELOCATED ~ ~ ~ \ \ ¢ ~ ~
/ / ~ / ~ A~ LOT 2: 2.93 ACRES i / / ~ ~ S~Fti i' \ ~ 1 ti ` ° \ \ ~ ~ \
/ / ~ J• TOTAL. 30.34 ACRES (1,321,649 SF) / / ~ \ ~ ~ ~ i ~ 1• XISTING ` EXISTING \ ~
ZONING: R-20 C~ r~~ / / ~ ~ , DRIVEWAY ! i TRAILER 1 ~ m
WATERSHED DISTRICT: E-B WATERSHED ~ ~ INSIDE CITY LIMITS, INSIDE UGA / /y`~ ~ ~ TO BE REM i TO BE REMOVED ~ N
~ ~ CURRENT USE: RESIDENTIAL I ~ ~ o~ ~ - ~ ~ z i ~ ~ ~
IMPERVIOUS SURFACE MAY NOT EXCEED 24~ OF LOT AREA. ~ ~ ~ J , J~ - r a. DATE: 8101!01 i ~
EXISTING IMPERVIOUS SURFACE: 34 251 SF 2.59 / ~ ~ ( ) \ ~ ~ ~ ,,,,~,r~ ~G,,^ JOB NO: 00208
NOTE "A" ~ ~ / i~ i ~ i ~ WIN
SEE PLAT "PROPERTY SURVEYED FOR THE MANSON COMPANY, INC." BY ~L ~ \V ~ ARTHY R P S DATED 4 g 01 RECORDED IN PLAT / ~ ~ ~ WIWAM H. McC , J L , / / / ~ ~ . 00-208 ~ ~ ~ S . ~'h
BOOK 153, PAGE 25. / ' , , , ' F ti DESIGNED: , ' DRAWN
/ / \ N TE "B" ~ 1 ` LMH
0 " NOTE F / ~ SEE PLAT PROPERTY SURVEYED FOR W,Y, MANSON WIFE, PATRICIA g0 FOOT IMDE CITY OF DURHAM ACCESS ROAD k SANITARY SEWER / ~ ~ ` » ~ $35'4600 E CHECKED:
" Y P A 3 3 8 RECORDED / ~ SCOTT MANSON BY J. WATTS COPLE , LS, D TED / /7 , EASEMENT. SUBJECT TO TERMS STATED IN THE DECLARATION IN REAL ~ / ; ~ ~ PLAT BOOK 87, PAGE 57. ESTATE BOOK 1510, PAGE 958. NO STRUCTURES, FILL, EMBANKMENTS, / ~ • • • ~ • 295 77' EXISTING HU ~ & TACK HORIZONTAL SCALE:
TREES OR OBSTRUCTIONS PERMITTED WITHIN THE EASEMENT EXCEPT / ~ \ \ PROPERTY SURVEYED FOR 1"=60'
NO1E "C" ACCORDING TO THESE TERMS. / ~ SEE PLAT "PROPERTY SURVEYED FOR JOHN L SCOTT rI< SADIE J. SCOTT " " ~ \ ~ \ ~ VERTICAL SCALE:
ESTATE" BY CULBRETH ENGINEER, DATED 4/22/42, RECORDED IN PLAT NOTE G ` ` ` NA
STREAM BUFFER: 50' WIDE UNDISTURBED STREAM BUFFER EACH SIDE OF ~ BOOK 14, PAGE 90. STREAM, MEASURED FROM TOP OF BANK. NO CLEARING OR GRADING / ~ \
nTUro Tueu eci rrnvc Tuiuuiur eun naniueav ueiu~rueurc nc \ ~ SHEET N0.
NOTE "D" EXISTING VEGETATION PERMITTED. 1-1--.- „ SYMBOL LEGEND
50 FOOT WIDE CITY OF DURHAM ACCESS ROAD & SANITARY SEWER EASEMENT. SUBJECT TO TERMS STATED IN THE DECLARATION IN REAL "H" DURHAM OUTSIDE TWP., DURHAM CO., NORTH CAROLINA
ESTATE BOOK 1510, PAGE 958. NO STRUCTURES, FILL, EMBANKMENTS, NOTE TREES OR OBSTRUCTIONS PERMITTED WITHIN THE EASEMENT EXCEPT CONTOUR LINES TAKEN FROM CITY OF DURHAM TOPOGRAPHIC MAP. EXISTING CONCRETE MONUMENT FIELD WORK PERFORMED NOVEMBER 27, 2000
ACCORDING TO THESE TERMS. NOTE EXISTING IRON PIN
SCALE i" = 60' PROPERTY AS DESCRIBED IN DEED BOOKS 932-319, 3037-575, 396-82 2
NOTE "E" ALL DISTANCES ARE HORIZONTAL GROUND AND AREA BY COORDINATE COMPUTATION. SEWER MANHOLE . 30 FOOT WIDE CITY OF DURHAM SANITARY SEWER EASEMENT. SUBJECT
TO TERMS STATED IN THE DECLARATION IN REAL ESTATE BOOK 1510, NOTE "K" FIRE HYDRANT PAGE 958. NO STRUCTURES, FILL, EMBANKMENTS, TREES OR THIS PROPERTY IS LOCATED IN ZONE X OUTSIDE 500 YEAR FLOODPLAIN. PUMP STATION 60' 0 60' 120' STANDING IN THE NAME OF
OBSTRUCTIONS PERMITTED WITHIN THE EASEMENT EXCEPT ACCORDING TO AS DEFINED BY FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP #3706300058G, W. Y. MANSON & WIFE AND THE MANSON COMPANY, INC. OF 5
THESE TERMS. 3706300054G, DATED 2/2/96.
T

N \ N30'20'33"W CLUSTER SUBDIVISION DATA Z
N30'20'33"W ~ N30'20'33"W '33"W N 0'33"W I N '20'33"W N'~~ ~ TOTAL AREA: 30.34 ACRES (1,321,649 SF) 236.6r 66.2z' ~ ~
157.15' L1 148.02' 131.80' 271.38' " G '~1Jb.p~¢~,• AREA IN NEW STREETS: 3.05 ACRES Z ~ - - - - - AREA IN OPEN SPACE: 2.66 ACRES ~ U
r-- ~ 103.40' r -I ~ ~ » ~ "OPEN SPACE A . m OPEN SPACE B ~ - - - - - - r `o.. o• ~ - - - - - - - - - - ~ ~ ~ AREA IN FUTURE DEVELOPMENT: 2.78 ACRES w ~
( ~ I I U r :~'87 817 SF'~'•'~' ~ I ~ 11411 SF I N I I \ AREA IN LOTS: 21,85 ACRES Z N ~
a' I ( ~ TOT LOT ~ I ',y ~ I \ pe TOTAL NUMBER OF LOTS: 43 - Z ~ I n n sj AVERAGE LOT SIZE: 22134 SF ~ ~
1 I ~ ~ - -z d LOT 33 ~ I - '~9 w o \ LOT 10 NI \ a ZO tii/ I~ \ y G Sj ZONING: R-20 w U ~
I I ~ m I LOT 32 I LOT 21 l \Z ~ .z 20,030 SF 8 N N3o'2o 33 w \ l ~W f ~ . ~ 5 SF ~ I ~ - ~ ? ~s, 20,29 I , WATERSHED DISTRICT: E B WATERSHED
I I ~ $ ~ I 20,005 SF I 7.se s 22,288 SF , , ',c~ ~ _ r , ~ I I INSIDE CITY LIMITS, INSIDE UGA o ~ ` ~ \ \ ~ PROPOSED USE: RESIDENTIAL - ~
8 ~ I I s ~ ~ ~ ~ I LOT 9 \ IL A ~ ~ MINIMUM EXTERIOR LOT SIZE: 20,000 SF m
; ~ L 20,178 SF \ . w i ~ MINIMUM EXTERIOR LOT WI TH' 1 N w Q
" I I g N \ LOT 20 / / o ~ , N o w L------J =1 l f ,.~1~ \ \ w cv \ EXTERIOR LOT MINIMUM SETBACKS: 35 FRONT; > ~
1BZ.33' ' ~ \ 17,281 SF / / ~ ; \ ~ ~ cv ~ \ \ 30 TOTAL SIDE;12 SIDE o ~ E
~ 8 N o33w LOT 22 0 .y. r ~ m ~ 46. I 17 446 SF I / /CITY OF DURHAM ~ LOT 11 \ 17.5 STREET SIDE; 25 REAR W z ~
~ ~ ANITARY SE R I N I ` EASEMENT , 15,388 SF ~ ~ •N c 1 c 2,29"W MINIMUM INTERIOR LOT SIZE: 10,000 SF w o! ~ ^ o
I `l I ~ 1 ~ (SEE NOTE A 'o~'~'•;•;•' . , p n >E u ~ I ~ ~ / / i , . i N3'1'S ~ ~ 0 o Q, ~
a I LOT 34 I g I I n / 01 ) a h ~ ~ I 2 N2o~r ~ / . ~ 13744 MINIMUM INTERIOR LOT WIDTH: 50 ~ o_ 0 ^ ,p _ _ ~I INTERIOR LOT M?NIMUM SETBACKS: 17,5 FRONT; ~ ~ ~ o
o ~ a I LOT 31 I m ~ ~v I ~ r -1 LOT 19 ~ \ , . J I 20,014 SF I o W $ I ~e 2 os+r J ~ W ~ U 0 ~ _ 15' TOTAL SIDE' 7.5 SIDE w Z 0 w ~ J s ~ ~ _ Um
15,332 SF I • J 17,503 SF / / 1 , , , , 1 I o 8N I 8N I ~ i \ / . W • ; I o ~ \ / / I { ^ I ti 17,5' STREET SIDE; 12.5 REAR ~ Z o ~ ~ , , ~ 29~ I = o 0 Z o -
~-----------J E fl ~I ~ , ~ / / 11.55 ~ 1 ry ! LOT 8 ~ ~ U Q ~ _ > ~ \ ~ ~ , STREET CONSTRUC110N DATA ~ ~
\ / / I . N30'20 33 W I ~ ~ i \ ~ / ~ ~ LENGTH OF NEW STREETS: 2635 LF TOTAL Q \ / 20,055 SF F
2oa.a1' I V ~ LOT 23 \ ~ ~ / . , , , ~ _ I STREET CONSTRUCTION IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CITY OF
~ ~ ~ ~ ffi ~ LOT 18 ~ N 0 3W ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 3o'z ~ 18,580 SF + ~ , , , , r W ~ ~ \ ~ ~ ~ DURHAM STANDARDS. LOT 12 ~
3 I m 146.02 \ 17,303 SF I I I ~ LOT 24 \ , , , I rte,
O • N ti~ \ \ 1 , ~ I I f ~ w o t z ~ 18,834 SF , ~ m 9 ~ PROPOSED 30 CITY $I \ o \ 15,353 SF " NOTE •A' , , \ S30'2033 E PROPOSED 30 FOOT MIRE qn OF DURHAM SANITARY SENER EASEMENT.
a I LOT 35 I ~ 8 N I ? A OF DURHAM SANITARY \ , , ~ dal \ N \ I 21,517 SF I ; ~ I LOT 30 ~ SEWER EASEMENT v CURVE 4 229.70' SUBJECT TO TERMS STATED Ri THE DECLARATION W REAL ESTATE BOOK 1510, PAGE 986 NO STRUCTURES, FNJ., EMBANKMENTS, TREES OR
m SEE NOTE "A" ~ N) I . 8+-49-40 \ / • , , . , I I PT 2,+ae.49 18,028 SF ( R +saao' 3 E , . , / - - - - - - - - t~ OBSTRUCTIONS PERMITTED NATAIN THE EASENENi EXCEPT ACCORDING TO , ~ 8 , THOSE TERMS
m •pT2 , , I ~ L ¦ 214.22' \ 540 ~ \ PROPOSED I L20 CITY STORM No1E "e"
o L-------------"~ ! Dc•38-11-80 ~ 151.80 I I I DRAINAGE EASEME LOT 7 ~ euFFER: so Foor HIDE uNDISTUReED sTREAM BllfFER EACH SIDE \ " " ~ Z OF STREAM, MEASURED FROM TOP OF BANK. NO CLEARRIO OR GRADING
530'20'33"E ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ , , , , 228.89 a ~ , ~ 1? 38 E ~ E NOTE C ~ 28 249 SF ~ # OTHER THAN sELECnVE THINNING AND aRD91ARY MARiTENANCE aF EwsnNG ~ ~ ~ vEGETAnaN PERMITTED.
- - ~ , ~ 198 / 138• ~ - + +9.40 ~ PR 16' CITY ~o a OPOSED o
L ~ . r ~ z I , LOT 29 ~ ~ W I \ ~ Z ~ STORM DRAINAGE EASEMENT ~ ' , ~ N• PROPOSED 18 FOOT MIDE PUBLIC STORM WATER DRAINAGE EASEMENT. , , , , '36: ~ - - J (SEE NOTE "c"). oMNERSHIP aF, AND AESPONSD31Un FOR IMPROVEMENT AND MAINTENANCE
I 4.00 ~ / PROPOSED 1 ' z z , I 11 ~ 15,420 SF 6 ~ ~ I LOT 17 , , , ¦ t8~ - - - OF STORM WATER FACAIiIES IN iNIS EASEMENT REMAINS INiN THE
I / CITY STORM I ~ ~ 3 LOT 38 $ / 1 ~ ~ ~ a , , , I \ DRAINAGE EASEMENT I N ~ N I 22,002 SF ' ' 530'20'33"E GRANTOR. IF THE PROPERn Is wnNIN OR COMES A PART OF THE an, ','PROPOSED 32 ' THE EASEMENT AND ACCESS P08i1S TO THE EASEMENT ARE SUBJECi 10 , , 280,88' '~'CIT1s ST M DRAINA Q THE tE101S AND RESiRIC110NS STALED IN THE `REVSED DECLARA110N OF
o PROPOSED 16' CITY ~ \ SEE NOTE " " ~ ~ ~ . ~ 25,371 SF 1 \ ( ~ ~ ~ I \ , , , ~ ~ 8 " - - - RIGHTS AND PRIVLEGES OF THE qn OF DUAHAN RI STORM WATER •'EASEMENTT,' p 1 - - - - - - - - - - - - - MANAGEMENT FAd
N I STORM DRAINAGE ~ I m , , a 1 ~p LOT 28 \ LOT 25 ~ I , EE NOTE "D" , , ~ un EASEI~NTS" RECORDED RI REAL ESTATE BOOR 2298, \ PAGE 208, MI9CH DOWMENT IS INCORPORATED HEREIN. THIS EASEMENT
~ I EASEMENT ~ I ~ ti \ / 17487 SF \ 17931 SF I--____ I ~ , ~ "w ~ ~ ~ (SEE NOTE D i- , ,W - " , . LOT 8 ~ z AND REVISED oECXARAnaN DO NOT CREATE THE oBUCATKxI TG PROVIDE 1 ~ ~ PUBUC MAINTENANCE NO BINLDINOS, STRUCTURES, OILS, EMBANKMENTS OR
.55 Ot ~ . \ / ~ ~ N , Z PC . +3+97.94 ' 7 I N42 ~ \ ~ \ / / ~ W 8 30,335 SF ~ ~ aeSTRllcnoNS PERMITTED MATNNi THE EASEMENT Exgpr AccaRanc To , ~ $ ,o TNOSE TERMS.
. _ ~ r - \ \ / / LOT 28 - _ , , N ; I PROPOSED ~ , , 1 ~ . PROPOSED 30' CITY ~ ' N• NOTE b" t^ PROPOSED 32 FOOT HIDE PUBUC STORM WA1ER DRNNAGE EASEMENT,
" \ / 15,38 SF ~ - N I CITY STORM \ , l \ p183 \ STORM DRAINAGE EASEMENT oMNERSHIP aF, Ara RESPONSIBIUn FOR IMPRGVEMENr AND MARiTENANCE
.51 ~ / ~ 425 / ~ I I I DRAINAGE EASEMENT \ , ~ LOT 37 q, / a+RVE B \ / R LOT 16 , 9 Ot \ SEE NOTE "D" ~ aF STORM WATER FAquTRS R+ THIS EASEMENi REMAINS MITH THE \ ~ GRANTOR. IF THE PROPERn IS MAiH91 OR BECOMES A PART OF THE qn, a~y '
42• / I ¦ 80-G7-03 CURVE 8 ~ BEGIN MIDENM~G I I LOT 27 _ srA; +5+2a7s I / / ~ ~ ~ R . 2eG,~' I I 98 +0-20 \ 23,024 SF 23,813 SF / \ I R . +BS.++' \ aFFSEr: +zoo R J , ~ Z \ ~ 1HE EASEMENT ANO ACCESS POINTS TO THE EASEMENT ARE SUBJECT TO , \ ~ . THE TERMS AND RESTRIC110NS STATED IN THE 'REVSED DECLARATION OF
/ \ L 3ea6e' l I 18,482 SF I / / / \ \ . 22-02-+ I L - 2ea9o' 1 \ ,tip ~ ` 8 ~ . ~ RIGHTS AND PRIVILEGES OF THE qn OF DURHAM IN STORM WATER ~0~ ^ ~ \ MANAOEIJENT FACIUn EASEMENTS" RECORDED Ni REAL ESTATE BOOK 2290.
/ / ~ I I Dc ¦ 34-42-07 / / / ~ I I ~ \ \ ~ Apr` p ~ w 1P. ~ \ N 7 PAGE 208, MHICH DOCUMENT IS INCORPORATED HEREIN, iHIS EASEMENT 7 ~ F` ?S w ' ~ 00.99 AND REVISED DECLARA710N DO NOT CREATE THE OBLIGATION TO PROVDE
1 / / LOT 39 ~ I I ~ \ 1 / ~ ~ / / C33 ~ I + END IMDENINC ~ ~ ~ A 04 2 PUBUC MNNTENANCE NO BIAU~IGS, STRl1CTURE$ flLLS, EMBANKMENTS OR •)'Q ' A U OBSTRUC110NS PERMITTED MIiHIN THE EASEMENT EXCEPT ACCORDING TO
~ 23 321 SF ~ J m ~ LOT 1 ! / / , L I I sTA: +s+88.57 V ~ ~ ~ LOT 13 soFq GB \ FUTURE DEVELOPMENT THOSE TERMS.
w $ / / \ ~ a ~ - , , ; OFFSET: +3.0o R 8 / ~ 17,927 17,927 SF A'~' 4c , \ ~ ~F 120,952 SF NOTE ~~ti~, \ \ PROPOSED 17 F00T WIDE PUBUC STORM WATER DRAINAGE EASEMENi.
I . / 'lo/ / / \ 5207738"E ~ - - / ~ ~ \ ~ CURVE ~ / / / \ \ 90 / LOT 15 ~ ~ I ¦ CURVE 1 \ OMNERSHIP OF, AND RESPONSIBIUn FOR IMPROVEMENT AND MAINTENANCE I ¦ 48-28-3J \ , . OF STORM WATER FAgUTES IN THIS EASENp1T REMARIS MI1H THE
I / / / LOT 40 \ ~ o0 / / / \ 4 , 20,520 SF ~ ~ ~ R . 3: R ¦ 350.00' / \ GRANTOR. IF THE PIlOPERn IS MITHRI OR BECOMES A PART OF 1HE qn,
I / PROPOSED 30' CITY OF ' / 18,522 SF ~ ~ L ' 29 3 I / / DURHAM SANITARY ~ / 520 3e" ~ GG $ i ~ 18-19-37 ~ / \ \ °c ¦ + L ¦ 295.92' / R \ , , \ THE EASEMENT AND ACCESS POSITS TO THE EASEM~rIT ARE SUBJECT TO DC ¦ 18-22-1 \ 1HE TERMS AND RESTRICTIONS STATED IN 1FIE 'REVSED DECLARA110N OF RKiHT3 AND PRIVILEGES OF THE do OF DURHAM w STORM WATER
O ~ ~ / / / \ E - 12409' 17 GG A ~~1~ y R • 181,00' / / \ / E~ , \ MANAGEMENT FAgUn EASEMENTS' RECORDED NI REAL ESTATE BOON 2298, + \ , , , , , PACE 208, MI9CH DOCUMp7T IS INCORPORATED HEREIN, iNIS EASETAENT
a n I / SEWER EASEMENT / 1 .n, ~ ~ \ tia - ~ + ~ ' a+ , L 57.90' / / \ ? a (SEE NOTE "A") / /PROPOSED 6 CI ~ I / STORM DRAINAGE 3 ~ \ xti~ Dc - 31-39-18 / ~ Cb~ ~Z~ ~ / PROPOSED , , , , \ AND REVTSEO DEaARAnaN DG Nor CREATE THE oBlKiAna+ ro PROWDE ~ / \ PUBUC MNN AN
y LOT 38 / EASEMENT ~ 4 ' / ~ F\ ~ p, F\ CITY STORM \ . , ~ aesTRUCTION~S PER~ITTm M,~THI~n~iE E~ASEM~ENT~c~T AccoRO~iNG Tn ~ \ DRAINAGE EASEMENT \ ~ THOSE TERMS
22 205 SF ~ / (SEE NOTE D f - _ ~ 9 F ~ g, \ /
. LOT 41 ~A ~ \ I 1 ~ ~ ~ v~pr~~~~ LE ~ - - ~ ~ + NGTE 'F'
• 13,185 SF ~ ~ / ~ PROPOSED P I 1 4 ~ ~ • ~c / s / / \ ~ ALL LOTS TO BE SERVNID BY PUBLIC SEMER Ara WATER. ti W
~ 5 SIDEWALK n ? C LOT 14 / d I 1 c6s / \ 0 / / / , ~ ~ ~ ~ / to > . , , . . , ~ 0~ m NOTE 'C' i ~ , , , ~ N STREET AND DRIVEWAY (PACT 10 RtA1WIN TUNER lIALL IEOIRTE
sRs / 20,248 SF L_ e 1 LOT 42 / A s ?A ~l~ I I ' APPROVAL FROM N, C. DINIpI ~ ~111R GUKJTi:
c ~ LOT 43 / \ 99 'a• / . 14,387 SF / \ s w / ~ VO ~ ~ ' Pie E~ 1 NOTE 'H• ~,~13g I , . \ TM All PLAT AND DEED DEDICATRK; RIGHT aF WAY TO BE RECORDED PRIOR TO
~ , ~ / / 15,757 SF / Qp• / R ~PQO, , E SSUANCE OF BUWDNO PERMI ,
~ / / LOT 44 \ ~ \ / \ s ,cp ~ l c, ~ / ~ 1 , . NOTE 1' 5~ g. \4r ~ Q ' NCDOi DRIVEWAY P~1T REGIAAED PRIGII 10
/ 18,298 SF \ € / ~ ~ \ \ ~ ~ \ Z ~ , , PROPOSED NOTE 'J'
" " PROPOSED 30' 's'~ G OPEN SPACE C / / s / / \ , >rITY STORM LOT 1 SHAU. NAVE NO aRECT ACCESS TO GUESS R0.
G ~ CITY OF DURHAM ~ ~ G 38,741 SF / SANITARY \ ~ ~ SEWER / ~T 2 \ RAINAGE EASEMENT 21,588 SF ~ . , , . , THE LocATIGN of THE saEWALKS sawn aN THIS PLAN a SCHEMATIC. A
G EASEMENT .4~ \ '~Gi• 15 \ \ / / \ , . , ~ ~ an aF WRHAM/OR Ncoor ErlcaoAalLR>ar PERwr Is REGUR~D PRIOR Tn \ / / t~ . , , . O ANY CONSTRUC110N. AFTER OBTARNKi THE REOUIIIED PERMITS, PLEASE \\\IUIIIIII111j1!
G ~ SEE NOTE "A', .hh \ \ \ ~ ~ \ / / \ , . , ~ CONTACT THE qn OF DURHAM ENOlirEERr1C CONSiRUC110N NiSPEC110N \ OFFlCE AT 880-4328 FOR APRE-CONSTRUCTION CCNFEAENCE AND A HELD ~ ~ ~ i
CURVE 2 / , ~ ~ . C ~i \ / 1 . , 1 G NST PPoOR TO ANY MOAK ON THE PROPOSED SCEWN.K. ~ . ~ i / PROPOSED 1 , , . , , . , . ~
G ~ I ¦ 10-00-47 ~ ~ R ¦ +8+.00' ~,~p" T N \ / / CITY STORM ~ , ~r0 NGTE'L" ~ ~'9 •Cp \ / . ~ LOT 1 AS PER DEED eoac 435, PAGE 873-875 SHALL BE SUBJECT TO A
4~ L ¦ 31.83' / ? ~ .Q1 STk 1~ .11 G Dc ¦ 31-39-18 / QC, ti, \ / DRAINAGE o~ ~ PERPETUU cGNTRIUINO sco8c EASEMENT: THE PROPERn wLL NGT 9E usED - SEAL i , / 1'` ~ EASEMENT AT ANY TIME FOR ANYTHING OTIIERR THAN ONE SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL
. ,CA , OFFSET: +2.00 R ~?R s~. T R S LOT 3 SEE NOTE "C" . , , ' , DMELLING IMTH SUPPORTIIC WTBUILDINOS SUCH AS A GARAGE OR PUMP = 15456 ~ Q;; Z 1 , , . 1 HOUSE, ETC,). NO MOBN,E NOME CAN BE LOCATED ON LOT 1, '
LOT 45 / ~ F / / PROPOSED 17 CITY / 1ti n ~ 81688 SF o ~ ~ t\ .
STORM DRAINAGE 15,011 SF / , •P ~ / \ EASEMENT \ / / \ y' 1 CT ~i`- n ''T'Y~ V
C " " / /BEGIN TAPER \ NOTE E ~ / ~ STA: 12+88.37 \
\ ~ ~ / OFFSET, 17.00 R \ PROPOSED u ,~ry7r f ~ \ \ ~ 9~ •0 1
5' SIDEWALK / \ \ ~ \ `SO• ~ 9 G \ '.9~~'.... ~ ~ 'SL's OPEN SPACE CALCULATION \ S \ ,O~~d ti
. NC~T .4r 4' / \ I 4' c ~ \ I PROPOS D < PROPOSED OPEN SPACE } \ cC'T• \ ~ ~''0 \ 'y ' m
I ~ ~ \ I SIDEWALK ~ ~ 0 ~ \ '~'/C W Z 1 ' , 1 LOT AR A SF R IR \ F to ~ G.'.'.'.. \ 11 1 4 1
I ~ y1 ~ 0 \ 9~ Z 1 12 1 4847
(A ~ 13 17 7 7
~o G G a . A ~ ~x~ LOT 1 Og 18 ,7 7 LOT 1 \ 'a ~ \
1 ~ S ~ 108,788 SF d S ti ~ 1s 17 a 7 )8,788 SF \ ~,y 20 17 1 71
1 I ~V ~d o \ \ ~ S~ 22 17 4 0 \ - \ 23 1 4 ~
0 ~ ~ \ \ . \ 24 1 4 1 0.
\ 1P~ \ X10 x 70 PROPOSED \ 25 17 1 9 U \ \ (n N
SIGHT CITY STORM \ ~ \ 28 17 7 13 w \ \ 27 1 t Z o
' . ~ TRIANGLE ~ ~ DRAINAGE EASEMENT TYP. \ \ 28 1 4
S ~ ( ) J \ 1 29 1 4 4 (n \ ~M \ 30 1 74 >
/ / \ \ ~ 31 1 4 LU
/ \ \ ~ry 40 1 47 ~ \ \ 4t 1 1 1
/ \~o. \ 42 14 7 t
~ \B / \~~l \ BG, \ 43 1 7 7 4 4 ~
. / \~iti \ ti 1 7 ~ s ~ / 45 1 11 4
~ s \c 'A ~ Fq \
so• s ~G~, 4j \ qC, _ _ _ . - ~ TOTAL OPEN SPACE REQUIRED: 79,407 SF (1.82 AC.) w 9G \'f _ _ . _ - PROPOSED OPEN SPACE: 115,989 Sf (2.88 AC,) m
~F ~ ~ ~ F,p \ z
9,~ F
~G \ ~ ~ \ PROPOSED IMPERVIOUS SURFACE CALCULATIONS: DATE, 4IO9iO2
295.77' \ IMPERVIOUS SURFACE MAY NOT EXCEED 24% OF LOT AREA.
\ SITE AREA: 1,200,897 SF JOB N0: 00208 CURVE TABLE MAX. IMPERVIOUS SURFACE ALLOWED: 288,167 SF
CURVE TABLE ROADS: 75,794 SF DRAWING: 00-208-04 CURVE LENGTH RADIUS CHORD DIRECTION CHORD SIDEWALKS: 10,190 SF
LINE TABLE CURVE LENGTH RADIUS CHORD DIREC110N CHORD C43 33,41 25,00 S11 1'57" 30.97 PUMP STAl10N: 7,717 SF DESIGNED: ~Wp
LINE BEARING LENGTH CURVE TABLE L1 CURVE LENGTH RADIUS CHORD DIRECTION CHORD C2t 21.38 170.00 7' ' 1"W 21,37 C44 82,98 1028.18 SO 9' 5" 82.94 TOTAL MAX IMPERVIOUS SURFACE ALLOWED FOR LOTS: 194,468 SF T10N CHORD C22 81.78 170.00 "W 80.98 C45 98.50 190.11 N3 '1 '09" 97.40 AVERAGE MAX. IMPERVOUS SURFACE ALLOWED PER LOT: 4,522 SF DRAWN; LMH
L2 C1 281.88 976.16 S17'47'45"W 261.08 'W 261,08 C23 80.00 170.00 S18'2 ' 5"W 59,89 C48 114.50 1028.18 S11'10'41" 114.44 MAX IMPERVIWS SURFACE ALLOWED PER LOT: 4,500 SF
L3 C2 8.35 370.00 N7 '3 ' "W 8.35 L4 ' 'W 8,35 C24 83.47 170.00 S 47 '47" 63.10 C47 131,33 1026.18 S1 '02'28" 131.24 MAX IMPERVIWS SURFACE FOR LOT 3: 11,217 SF CHECKED:
C3 88.09 370.00 N7 'I ' "W 88.00 L5 ' , " C4 182.88 370.00 7'3 "W 161.57 'W 66.00 C25 18,18 170.00 17'44' 16.17 C48 97,70 285.00 Nt ' B'2 "W 97.22 HORIZONTAL SCALE: 'W 181,57 C28 23.18 25.00 N '1 " 22.38 C49 61,30 1026.16 3'25'0 " 81.29
L8 C5 83.81 370.00 S '25' "W 63.53 L7 ' 'W 63,53 C27 71,94 50.00 $ 65.89 C50 81,00 1054,14 2`11'10" 80.99 1" = 60'
CB 23.18 25.00 N 8'I ' 1"E 22.36 LB C7 52.94 50.00 7' "W 50.50 "E 22.36 C28 85.71 50.00 N7 61,08 C51 97,17 285,00 N08'56'51` 96,70 SYMBOL LEGEND VERTICAL SCALE: "W 50.50 C29 59.88 50.00 NO '1 " 56,37 C52 13,75 1054,14 S24'19'03" 13.75 NA
l9 ' L10 ~ CS 83.00 50.00 1 1'44"W 58.91 "W 58,91 C30 37.28 50.00 N 7 ' 1'W 36.42 C53 50,00 285,00 N23'44' 49,94 SHEET N0.
nn a"nn en nn goon on nx• n2 ~e nee nn n.~.n.':n"r 99 'iR I`5L Si 'tR 9iiR M1 u:.m'ec"r F{ '{(1 ~ EVICTING f`fUJfKiCT'C IIANI111CNT
L11 • 1 M 1 VA J1.VV NV.VV 4 I/1 a r. T .VL TOOL VJI LJ•IV LJ,Y 7/ I IwT V/ r..••. •,.r vv...n.r r " 46,25 C32 134.36 235,00 N '44" 132,53 C55 148.64 1912.51 S30'59'41" 148,80 EXISTING IRON PIN
L12- s2o*2 '36"E 19.00 . C10 48.08 50.00 N7 ' " 46.25 L13 S20-27-36-E 34,00' C11 34.79 50.00 N26"27 3" 34.09 34,09 C33 133,13 235,00 N049 "W 131,38 C56 74,73 285,00 N47'00 74,52
L14 1 C12 23.18 25.00 5' 33"W 22.36 V 22.36 C34 105.46 140.11 N4 '01' "W 102,99 C57 25.54 285,00 N 7'05'2 " 25,54 Q IRON PIN SET
L15 N26-24-50-E 39,38' C13 146.24 330.00 7 1'09"W 145.04 L16 S08-05-13-W 10,00' C14 132.77 330.00 N 5'34"W 131.88 'W 145.04 C35 140.59 145.11 S89 *0727"W 7"W 135,16 C58 61,11 235,00 N 2'12' 7" 60,94 'W 131.88 C36 172.31 130.00 7' '40"W 159,97 C62 261,86 976.18 1747'45"W 261,08
L17 N30-20-33-W 50,00' C15 39.27 25.00 N ' 4'00"W 35.36 "W 35,36 C37 15,34 156.00 ' 4'16"W 15.34 C63 72,63 1004,14 S '3 '17" 72.61 3
L18 N39*43'22*E 5,13' C16 36.00 206.00 S13 '36"W 35.95 "W 35.95 C38 41,18 25,00 S60* 54'39"W 38,68 C64 11,89 370,00 S6 '34'4 "W 11.89 SCALE 11' = 60' " 49.69 C39 541,48 976.16 9 1'16" 534,57 C65 110.04 1962,51 S27'33' 1" 110,02
L19 S71*42'05*W 20,80' C17 49.90 156.00 N17'15'01" 49.69 L20 C18 33.26 25.00 N 4' '49-E 30.86 " 30,86 C40 93.09 1026.16 ' '30"W 93,06 C66 93,43 1912.51 S27 2' 7" 83.42 60' 0 601 1201
L22 N20-27'36"W 8,17' C19 63.36 185.11 N 7 "W 63.05 'W 63.05 C41 94,18 1026.16 SOO*43'11"E 94,15 C67 60,89 976.16 SO '19' "W 60.88 OF 23
L23 C20 70.00 185.11 7 '1 ' 4"W 69.58 'W 69.58 C42 65.89 206,00 N17"1 '01" 65,61 C68 13,35 130,00 S5 "W 13,35

~ Z
01 _ \
i - ~ ~ - - Z ~
\ ~ U \ w ~
„ U OPEN SPACE B w 1 z ~
\1 - Z 1 ~
~ ~1 ~1 LOT 10 Z U w U M
LOT 33 ~ ~ -
LOT 32 .LOT 21 ~ 1 a 1 ~ o 1 w
1 W ~
ti 1 a 1 h~Q
1 LOT 20 e 1 ~ wN"
e LOT 9 > 1 ~ - N LOT 11 ~ 00 ~
LOT 22 P ANENT MINOR 1 1 oU~ o ~ try FZN U
RSION. ICAL. SEE DETAIL. 1 M C W Q= 3
1 3gg ~ 0 ~ ~ 0 ~ ~ -0
a LOT 19 f- ~~o. ~ 1 I U ~~ti o
LOT 31 LOT 34 g w Z ~ W 1 I _ ~m
o, ~ 1 I a Z o~U = Z o~0
I I U Q
I LOT 8 Q
b I
9 1
LOT 23 I 1 LOT 12
LOT 18 ~ I 1 ~ 1
LOT 35 LOT 30 1 oEmi~loN t
LOT 24 4 4 g 31 ~
t-~' ,~51
~ \ K LOT 7
~ ~ - ~
~ / I5 19 s, / 15 ~ ~
9 \ / ~ LOT 29 , J
_
LOT 36 n z
LOT 17 LOT 17 wNOweu~ws H~o,e,,"~° H 1
a LOT 25 ~ o
1 LOT 6 ~ ~ 1
p~ a ~ a 1
~ 8 ~ ~I
~ ~ PERMANENT MEDIUM . \ ~ f DIVERSION,
® LOT 37 LOT 28 LOT 16 LOT 16 ~ ~ 2 ~ mow ~ ~ ~ TYPICAL. SEE DETAIL.
` ~owws Ho ~ DE1Dl1101!
LOT 27 9 LOT 28 W ' ~
W ~
3 1g N ss
\ ~ FUTURE
\ r , \ DEVELOPMENT
LOT 13 ~ ~ \ A7
LOT 39 a e LOT 15 \ \ )T 15
LOT 40 ~ ~ \ \
5 DE1Dl110N
\ 3 E; a . 1
\ ~ ~>7
\ LOT 41 ~A,
\ \ ' ~ 4 \ LOT 14 ss a~ H
~ \ ~w a
\ LOT 42 LOT 43 ~
~ I
s \ ,r- _ j ~ ~ ~
r \ ' / ~`.'1
' ~ ~ V
a
G \ `4~ s \ 1 W
LOT 44 SS ` I w J
w~ STORM DRAINAGE STRUCTURES TABLE ~+s a' J LOT 2 ~ 1
STRUCTURE TOP INV. IN INV. OUT REMARKS 1 ~ 1,
w CI 1 397.30 390.30 N 1 E 1 1
\\ry CI 2 397.30 390.10 S 389.90 NE ass LOT 45 _ _ , 1 1 I - 1 1 I
CI 3 391.80 385.0 S 384.80 SE ~ ~s 1 h
CI 4 391.80 384.60 N 379.00 SE STORM DRAINAGE PIPE TABLE ~B 5 388.00 373.50 NW 373.30 SE FROM TO DIA. AT. LENGTH SLOPE 1 1
FES 6 371.00 CLASS "B" RIPRAP APRON - 12'Lx6'Wx8"TH " a 1 ~ ~ 1 1 w 1 ~ 1
CI 1 q 2 15 Rq' 21 1.oX ~ W ~s q 2 q 3 15" RCP 16T 2.9X a LOT 3 1 ~
CI 7 382.00 374.40 W CI 3 q 4 1" R 1' 1 1~ a ~ x 1 ~~r F
CI B 382.00 374.20 E 374.00 NW 5 CP 2 .OX s~ q 4 JB 5 15" RCP 55' tO.OX w cn CI 9 377.00 369.60 SE 369.40 NW JB 5 FES 6 1 " R P ' ~ ~ 1 f 1
5 C 83 2.8X ~1 CI 10 375.00 367.70 S ~ L > > 1 1 m
CI 11 375.00 367.50 N 367.30 q 7 ~ ~ 1 1
367.50 SE q 8 15 RCP 21 1.OX !y 1 ~
t q 8 9 15" RCP 96' 4.6X FES 2 370.00 q 9 " y~ ~yh ~ , ,1 ~
CI t3 376.00 366.70 E 368.50 N q tt 15 RCP 76 2.4X q 10 q tt 15" RCP 21' 1.OX `,1
367.50 S 11 q q 13 15" RCP 62' 1.0X 11 14 364.00 360.20E FES 12 1 1 " 1 ~ 1
8 RCP 25 O.OX h YI 15 363.00 356.30 358.10 E q 13 " , z o LOT 1 ~ \ ~
358.30 S Y11 24 RCP 130 6.3X YI 14 YI 15 15" RCP 33' 5.8X ~ a ~ ~
11 16 367.00 356.80 358.60 ~ t " , 5 1116 24 RCP 63 2.1X ~ ~ U
FES 17 356.00 CLASS "B" RIPRAP APRON - 12'Lx6'Wx14"TH yl 16 FES 17 24 RCP 62 1,0X i ( RISER 18 360.00 355.90 t . o
FES 19 355.00 CLASS "A" RIPRAP APRON - 6'Lx5'Wx6"TH RISER 8 FES 19 15 RCP 89 1,0X ~
q 20 q 21 15" RCP 21' 1.0X N 1
CI 20 360.90 354.0 SE CI 21 1 " 1 q 22 5 RCP 31 .3X ~
CI 21 360.90 353.80 N 353.60 E CI 22 ' q 24 15 RCP 162 3.2X ~ CI 22 358.20 353.40 353.20 SE " , W ~
FES 23 q 24 30 RCP 35 2.OX FES 23 347.00 " , 3 . .
q 24 q 25 30 RCP 29 1.0X Y8. CI 24 352.90 346.10 NW 348.00 NE q 25 " I J ,r:; \ w \
346.30 SW FES 28 30 RCP 60 1.OX ; 9 \ p
~ 27 FES 28 15" RCP 45' 1.OX CI 25 352.90 344,70 SW 339.60 N PIPE 28 '
FES 26 339.00 CLASS "B" RIPRAP APRON - 18'Lx8'Wxt4"TH FES 30 15 RCP 38 1.OX \ i w
1127 354.50 339.50 , YI 31 S 32 15 RCP 35 1.0X FES 28 339.00 CLASS "A" RIPRAP APRON - 6'Lx5'Wx6"TH , \ f" ' ~ \ ~
PIPE 33 FES 34 15 RCP 45 1.0X PIPE 29 338.50 \ Z
FES 30 338.10 CLASS "A" RIPRAP APRON - 6'Lx5'Wx6"TH , DOUBLE CI 35 q 38 15 RCP 21 1.0X ~ ~ \ DATE: 4 091 2 ~ I 0
CI 36 FES 37 15" RCP 85' 1.OX \ JOB N0: 00208
YI 31 356.50 351.30 N FES ~ , FES 32 351.00 CLASS "A" RIPRAP APRON - 6'Lx5'Wx6"TH >7 39 15 RCP 76 10.2X ~ ~ DRAWING: 00-208-04
PIP ~ 39 FES 40 15" RCP 49' 1.OX E 33 350.40 PIPE 41 ~ ~
FES 34 349.90 CLASS "A" RIPRAP APRON - 6'Lx5'Wx6"TH FES 42 15 RCP 46 1.OX DESIGNED: SJB
YI 43 FES 44 15" RCP 24' 1.OX DRAWN: LMHlSJB
DOUBLE CI 35 349.50 340.00 N PIPE 45 ' CI 36 349.50 339.80 S 337.90E FES 46 15 RCP 67 1.OX
FES 37 337.00 CLASS "A" RIPRAP APRON - 6'Lx5'Wx6"TH FES 47 ' CHECKED:
FES 48 54 RCP 54 0.30X HORIZONTAL SCALE:
FES 38 347.00 1"=60'
~ 39 341.00 33s.2o sE 337.50 H A WAL AN WINGWA L N T ; VERTICAL SCALE: NA
FES 40 M" LS D L S O E 337.00 CLASS A RIPRAP APRON - 6 Lx5 Wx6 TH PIPE 41 336.40 THESE PLANS SHOW THE PROPOSED CROSSING OF A NEUSE RIPARIAN STREAM AND BUFFER
FES 42 336.00 CLASS "A" RIPRAP APRON - 8'Lx5'Wx8"TH FOR BLACKSTONE DRIVE. IN ORDER TO AVOID COSTLY MITIGATIONS, IT IS NECESSARY SHEET N0.
T~ I INIT ~ISTIIRRAN(x AF TNF AF~RFWFNTIANFII CTRFAII RIIFFFR TA WHAT IC CH(1WN
THIS REWIRES THAT TALLER HEADWALLS (12' INVERT-TOP), AND LONGER 30 DEGREE
YI 43 340.00 337.30 NE WINGWALLS (20' MAX.) MUST BE CONSTRUCTED. THERE ARE NO KNOWN STANDARD DETAILS
FES 44 337.00 CLASS "A" RIPRAP APRON - 6'Lx5'Wx6"TH FOR THIS APPLICATION. IT WILL BE NECESSARY FOR THE DEVELOPER TO HIRE A PIPE 45 336.60 STRUCTURAL ENGINEER TO DESIGN CONSTRUCTION DETAILS OF THESE HEADWALLS AND
FES 46 336.00 CLASS "A" RIPRAP APRON - 6'Lx5'Wx6"TH WINGWALLS, CUSTOMIZED TO FIT THE SITUATION. THESE DETAILS MUST BE DESIGNED SCALE 1" = 60'
AND SUBMITTED TO CITY OF DURHAM ENGINEERING AND STORMWATER FOR APPROVAL 60' 0 60' 120'
FES 47 336.10 CONCRETE CHANNEL -SEE DETAIL. PRIOR TO BEGINNING ANY CONSTRUCTION. A RAILING MUST BE INSTALLED AT THE TOP OF THE WALLS. SEE RAILING DETAIL.
FES 48 335.90 CLASS "B" RIPRAP APRON - 27'Lx14'Wx12"TH OF 23

" CLUSTER SUBDIVISION DATA
I N3o'20'33"W \ N30'2O'33"W ~ N30'20'33"W 0'33"W N ' 0'33"W \ N30 0' N3o'2o 33 W TOTAL AREA: Z 30,34 ACRES (1,321,649 SF) p 236.BY 66'22 AREA IN NEW STREETS: 3.05 ACRES ~ ~
1 1 146,02' 131,60' 2]1,38' " G '.178,p{~,~ 157.15 L , ~ N30'20 33 W , , \ \ ? U AREA IN OPEN SPACE: 2,66 ACRES ~
~ 103.40' „ ~ ~ ~ ~ „ „ ~ m - 'OPEN•SPACE A , „ o „ \ ' o ~ - - - - - - - - - - - - - ~ r - - ~ AREA IN FUTURE DEVELOPMENT: 2,78 ACRES w ~
r ~ .o OPEN SPACE B ~ ~ - - - - - - r ~ I I ~ ~ m ~ ~ 67 817 SF'.'.','.'' , , ' 1 w 1 I \ AREA IN LOTS: 21.85 ACRES Z N ,c
I I 1° ~ 1411 S 8 N I ~ N2 ' , , , ' :1 13 A - 1~ ,,o, ~ ~ , I \ g TOTAL NUMBER OF LOTS: 43 Z ,c
~ io ~ (TOT LOT) I f ~ I l , , , , ~ ° i m I ~ I ~ i o I n h 8~ AVERAGE LOT SIZE: 22134 SF ~ ~ T,,,~,. \ LOT 10 a \ a z 0 Z N I I ti ~ ZONING: R-20 w U N
e I LOT 33 ~ ~ J ' - , ''9 c ~ ~ I LOT 32 I LOT 21 I ~ , , , ,2 I I ~ N30'20'33"W , , , , ~ d ? 20,295 SF I WATERSHED DISTRICT: E-B WATERSHED
20,030 SF ~ $ N 1 I ,W I ~ , , , , ~ c I I ~ $ ~ I 20,005 SF I 7,se z 22,288 SF , , , ~c \ i9 ~ INSIDE CITY LIMIT ~ , F I I ~ , S, INSIDE UGA o
r I , , , , ~ \ \ ,o. ~ a 9 I LOT 9 t^ PROPOSED USE: RESIDENTIAL w , - ~ \ MINIMUM EXTERIOR LOT SIZE: 20 000 SF ~
I ~ m l \ ~ ~ ! '1 „ „ z # ~ L 20,178 SF \ ' , N ~ Q w i ~ MINIMUM EXTERIOR LOT WIDTH: 100 ? •
I I . I 2 l LOT 20 ~ / a.~ , , ~ N o w ~-------J , I \ 117281 SF / a m, ~ ~ \ \ ~ w cv \~t EXTERIOR LOT MINIMUM SETBACKS: 35 FRONT; N ~ ~
182.33 ~ ~ Q' ~v ~ i0~ •0 , \ 30 TOTAL SIDE;12 SIDE ~ ~ E
• I LOT 22 0 ~ I / /1~ROPOSED 30 ,9 , ~ ~ N30 033W ~ / /CITY OF DURHAM LOT 11 \ 17.5' STREET SIDE' 25 REAR o U ~ o
~ ~ ~ _ _ 146. _ _ ( 17,446 SF ~ I ~,9 , , , , ~ $ r - - - - - ~ I / / SANITARY SEWER ,ti , „ ~ \ _ ~ Lw z ~ v 15 388 SF - • N c
I I I ~ ` EASEMENT , " I I I I 1 ~ SEE NOTE A ~ ~ ~ , o '29"W MINIMUM INTERIOR LOT SIZE: 10,000 SF w ~ 0 0 \ ~ N37'52 MINIM M IN RI ~ ~ 0 ~ ~ `
o LOT 34 I ~ g I I v ~ ~ ~ / cl , a ~ 1 ~ ~ I 2 I Nio7r,~ n ~ / T 19 < ~ , , ~ 137 a2 U TE OR LOT WIDTH: 50 ~ ~ 0 ^ ,p _ _ INTER OR LO MINIMUM SETBACKS: 17,5 FRONT; U U 0 a:
a ~ ~ ~ v . LO , , , ~ 0 014 SF o t0 I LOT 31 I o ~ to~1r 1 , „ ~ w z aW r" I 15 TOTAL SIDE; 7,5 SIDE U m ~ s 1- -
~ 15,332 SF I • m ~ J 17,503 SF / / 1 I I o gN I gN I ~ ~ \ / „ ' ^ y 17.5' STREET SIDE; 12.5 REAR - Z o ~ U 29~ I I 2 0 ~ 0
1 .55~ LOT 8 I ~a~.. T T ~ Q ~ \ , STREE CONSTRUCTION DA A ~
~ \ ~ N30'20 33 W ~ ~ \ ~ \ ~ / ~ I LENGTH OF NEW STREETS: 2635 LF TOTAL Q ~ \ ~ / 20,055 SF F
V i ^ / , , 204,41 ~ ~ LOT 23 ~ / ~ ~ ~ _ v I STREET CONSTRUCTION IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CITY OF
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ LOT 18 m N30'2033W 16580 SF ~ , „ / I DURHAM STANDARDS.
~ ~ 146.02 ~ \ \ 17,303 SF " I I N I I A LOT 24 , LOT 12 ~ , I rte,
.a' I ~ y~ z \ \ ~ I f o• I I 18,634 SF ~ 1 ~ PROPOSED 30 CITY N \ , , 15,353 SF " NOTE 'A• \ S30'20 33 E PROPOSED 30 FOOT HIDE qtt OF DURHAM SANTARY SEVER EASEMENT,
LOT 35 I 8 m N I F DURHAM SANITARY m 1 229.70' SUBJECT TO TERMS STALED RI T1E DECLARAiIgi NI REV. ESTATE BOOK ' - - - - ~ 151q PAGE p5lL NO STRUCTURES, FNJ, EMBANKMENTS, TREES OR
21,517 SF ; • I LOT 30 F SEWER EASEMENT p, ~ CURVE 4 1 , , 1 I ~ " W NI I .81-49-40 \ „ - - - - ~ OBSTRUCTIONS PERMITTED YATHNV THE EASEMENT EXCEPT ACCORDING 10 , , ~ g , THOSE TERMS
PT ¦ 2t+88,49 16 026 SF (SEE NOTE A R - 1 3"E I , I m~ 50.00' 1 S40b7 2 1 L -214,22' ' , , PROPOSED I L20 CITY STORM ~
o~ ~--------------J fj I Dc-38-11-50 ' 151,60 I , , ~ I , , I STREAM BUFFER: 50 FOOT HIDE UNDISNRBED STREAM BUFFER EACH SIDE \DRAINAGE EASEME ~ LOT 7 aF STREAM, MEASURED FROM 1oP OF BANK. NO dJEARR4o oR ORADNC
S30'20'33"E ~ ~ , ~ ~ $ ~ , EE NOTE C N I + OTHER THAN sELECnUE THRIVING AND aRaNARY MNNIENANCE of EwsnNG
226,es o , ~ , ~ ? ~ e , I ~ 98.~~ 4' PT¦1 19.40 , M 28,249 SF „ ~ VEGETATION PERMITTED, ~ PROPOSED 16' CITY '~~o,
--1 ~ / 188.0 ~ / / A \ , , , \ i I STORM DRAINAGE EASEMENT " » PROPOSED ib FOOT HIDE PUBLIC STORLI WATER DRAINAGE EASEMENT.
I , ~ LOT 29 / I , , I X4,00' ~T / PROPOSED 16' z ~ z \ , , ` 1 ~ 15,420 SF / ~ ~ ~ I LOT 17 ~ , , , , '36'01" _ - _ J SEE NOTE c owNERSH~ oF, AND RESPGNS~IUtt FOR IIWR04EME11T AND MAp11ENANCE E ( aF STORM WATER FACILITIES Ri THIS EASEMENT REMNNS WITH THE \j , , , ~ " DRANIOR. IF THE PROPERtt IS YATHRI OR BECOMES A PART OF THE qtt,
I $ CITY STORM I ~ ~ a ~ t~' ,'PROPOSED 32 ' S30'2033 E 11NE EASEMEIIT AND ACCESS POINTS TO THE EASEMENT ARE SUBJECT 10 u
3 LOT 36 \ / 1 DRAINAGE EASEMENT a ~t N I 22,002 SF , ~ 'L,1' ~ I , 6 1 M" I I T , , , , DRAINA~E•~ 0 280,68' THE TERMS AND RESTRICTIONS STALED IN THE `RENSED DECLARA710N OF ~'~1 ','qTY STORM, g o , , - - - - - - - - - - - RIGHTS AND PRINLEOES OF THE qtt OF WAHAM IN STORM WATER EASEMENT,',', ~ ~ ~ _ - - - -
25 371 SF ~ \ PROPOSED 16 CITY (SEE NOTE C • R R I \ ; a~ I T RM DRAINAGE I m ~ s o LOT 28 1 LOT 25 ~ I \ . „ ~ ~ 1 MANAODAENT FACILITY EASEMENTS' RECORDED R4 REV. ESTATE BOOK 22p6, EE NOTED M \ PAGE 206, WHICH DOWMENT IS INCORPORATED HEREIN. THIS EASEMENT
~ I EASEMENT ~ o,• I ~ 1 LOT 8 1 z AND REUSED DEaARAnoN Do nor CREATE THE aeucAnaN To PRONOE , , \ ~ ~ PUBLIC MNNIENANCE NO BUILDINGS, STRIICIURES, OILS, EMBANKMENTS OR
~ , ~ \ (SEE NOTE "D"), / ° ,W 17,487 SF 17,931 SF L - _ _ _ _ _ " 30,335 SF 1 ~ aesTRUCnoNS PERMITTED WITHMI THE EASEMENT ExcEPT ACCORDING To \ $ ,o ,HOSE TERMS
I N42g5G \ ~S / NM W Z~ 3+97.94 g \ / / LOT 28 a ~vo1 ~ , 1 1 S' PROPOSED 30' CITY ' N' ?~~E b'
\ / . a ,o ~ I PROPOSED ~ / ~ a u~ I `f--- " ~ ~ - \ / 15,36 SF ~ ~ , _ N I CITY STORM D ~ 1 ~ PROPOSED 32 FOOT HIDE PUBLIC STORM WATER DRNNAOE EASEMENT. RM \ , , N183g \ STORM DRAINAGE EASEMENT I owNERS111P aF, AND RESPONSIBIUtt FOR IMPROUDIENT AND MNNIENANCE
. 5 1 ~ ~ / ~ ~ - . ~ DRAINAGE EASEMENT 425 ~ I I 1 / LOT 16 EASEMENT \ , , 01 4 \ (SEE NOTE D aF sralM WATER FACIUnES IN THIS EASEMNNr REMNNS MATH THE • \ I J GRANTOR, IF THE PROPERTY IS YNTHRI OR BECOMES A PART OF 111E dtt,
LOT 37 / / CURVE 8 ~ ~ \ R ,1 $ - 2 CURVE 5 ~ BEgN WDENING I 42 / ~ I .80-07 03 I I LOT 27 I I - 9e-io-zo STk 18+2&79 Z \ ~ , THE EASEMENT AND ACCESS POINTS TO 7HE EASEMENT ARE SUBJECT TO \ ' THE TERMS AND RESiTNCTIONS STATED IN THE "REUSED DECLARATION OF
/ / ~ ~ R 280.00' I \ 1 23,024 SF 23,813 SF / / \ ~ ~ L - 383,5e' I 18,462 SF R - 185,11' OFFSET 1200 R/ / RNIH75 AND PAINLEOES OF 7HE qtt OF DURHAM IN STORM WATER 0 ~ ~ 8 ~ \ ~ . MANAOFAENT FACIUtt EASEMENTS' RECORDED IN REV. ESTATE BOOK 2296,
/ / ~ c-- -i I I I L- ze2,90' 1 1 , e / / \ \ ~ ~ I n Dc - 34-42-07 / ` ry ~ I ~ ~ ~31' w 1:111 PAGE 208, WHICH DOWMENT S INCORPORATED HEREIN, TINS EASEMENT
~ ~ I ~ ~ ,ti I / / LOT 39 c ~ I I I 2 1 1/ ~ ~?S ~"W . , , . ' ~ \ N ,99' AND REUI9ED DECLARA710N DO NOT CREATE THE OBLIGATION TO PRONDE ~,~'Y A ~.F.r- ~ , , , . 2~ PUBLIC MAWTEIIANCE NO BINLDINGS, STRUCTURES, FlLLS, EMBANKMENTS aR ~ e~'Q q Vw OBSiRI1CTI0NS PERMITTED YdTHIN THE EASEMENT EKCEPT ACCORDING TO
~ ~ 23 321 SF / ~ ~ ~ J sa ~+~'S7 ~ . ~ LOT 13 ~Fq Ge 1 FUTURE DEVELOPMENT THOSE TERMS
~ ~ /1 / / / \ CS 8 A ~ , ` A OFFSET, 13.00 R $ ~ T ; ~ 17,927 SF a`~` (~o , , , . , , . \ ~ 120,952 SF ~~NJ. \ PROPOSED 17 FOOT WIDE PUBLIC STORK WATER DRNNAOE EASEMENT, uu
6~` / ` , a ~ ~ f / / / \ ~ ~ sE LOT 15 ~ CURVE 1 ~ \ , OWNERS1iIP OF, AND RESPONSIBNJtt FOR NIPROUEMENT AND MNNTENANCE
I / / / / LOT 40 \ ~ 4 / I ¦ 48-28-33 \ \ OF STORM WATER FAgUTIES N4 THIS EASEMENT REMNNS WITH THE R ¦ 350,00' / \ , GRANTOR, IF THE PROPERTY IS WITHIN OR BECOMES A PART OF THE qtt,
/ / / ~ 20,520 SF I / PROPOSED 30' CITY OF • / 18,522 SF CURVE 3 ~ n \ L ¦ 295,92' / t" \ \ THE EASEMENT MID ACCESS POINTS TO THE EASEMENT ARE SUBJECT TO \ Dc ¦ 18-22-1 ~ \ THE 1ERM3 AND RESTRIC110N3 STALED IN THE 'REUSED DECLARAiIpV OF
3 I / / DURHAM SANITARY ` / X07 3e ~ a I ¦ 18-19-37 ~ / \ o" ~ / / ~ 124,Og• 00 ~ y R .1B1.ao' / / \ y~ ~ ~ g ~ . , , , RNiN75 AND PRINLEOES OF THE dtt OF DURHAM Mr STORM WATER \ , / ,b \ \ MANAGEMENT FACIUtt EASEMENTS' RECORDED W REAL ESTATE BOOK 229&
N ~ I ~ / SEWER EASEMENT /PROPOSED 16' CITY ~ ~ z 1 ~ `'a' \ ya L - 5790' ~ w (SEE NOTE A / / ~ ~ ~ ~ \ Dc - 31-39-18 / / \ PACE 208, WHICH DOCUMENT N3 INCORPORATED HERENi. T111S EASEMENT \ , / PROPOSED . , \ AND REUSED DEaARAnaN Do NoT CREATE THE oeuoAnaN t0 PRONOE
I / STORM DRAINAGE i? kti / / \ • ~ y I LOT 38 E SE E " » 124, ~ ~ ~ / \ ~ ~ ~ / \ , PUBLIC MANIENANCE NO BUILDI STRUCTU Fl ET~IBANKMENIS OR \ 1~, CITY STORM \ ~ ~ ~ ~ OBSTRUCTIONS PERMITTED YATHpI T1N: EASEMENT EXCfP1 ACCORDING TO \ \ DRAINAGE EASEMENT \ ~ ~ THOSE
/ (SEE NOTE D , ~ O9 c^ ~ ~ 22,205 SF ,w R ~ _ , ~ / \
I El'N _ \ ~ OLD _ , ~ x ~ \ LOT 41 A C \ z NOTE 'F•
I r \ \ ~ jRC ~ ~ \ ~ 1 ~ ~ v LE ~ , ~ , / ~ 13,185 SF ARIABI~ ALL IDTS to eE sERNCED BY PUILIC No WATTDL N \ w m
~ 4 ~v PUeLtc ~ s / m ~ 5 SIDEWALK n ~ C LOT 14 / I C85 / \ 0 / / / / ~ ''y . ~ , I i~~o, NOTE .o.
~ / ~ \ \ / ~ / 20,246 SF , / , J~ ~ , . ~ p STREET AND DRIVEWAY NIPACT TO RIPARIAN BUFFER SHALL REWIRE 4~ . I I ~ APPROVAL FROM 1L a orASlpoN aF wATER WAtltt, / 4 ~
c l LOT 42 / \ *9 ,J~ / / < ~ o ~ LOT 43 / e~, y, / ,w / 1~ 9~1C~'~ I NoTt X / ~M Q~ ~ , . PIIAI PLAT AND DBID OFDICAiNO RIOIT OF WAY 10 BE AEOOIpED PRIOR TO
o ~ 14,387 SF / \ ~ ~ / / 15,757 SF / Qo• \ / E~' P`•'~' 13 , ,y. I \ THE IBBUANDE OF BUIDIq PEIrIT. R~ PO `~0 ~d \ ~
LOT 4 \ s \ l l J / q'b• w~ q 5 Q0 \ ~ , . NCDOT ORIUEWAY PERMIT AEOIIIRED PRIOR TO CONSIRUC110N,
/ 16 298 SF \ / \ 1 \ \ . , , \PROPOSED No1E'J"
" " PROPOSED 30' bS W Js' / M OPEN SPACE C / / J~ ~ w ~ ti , . TTY STORM LOT t SHALL NAVE NO DIRECT ACCESS TO C<lESS Ro. / LOT 2 \ \ ~
G G ~ CITY OF DURHAM / ~ G 36,741 SF / \ F ~ ~ ~ gRAINAGE EASEMENT No1E •K• 21,588 SF ~ a• \ THE LOCAnoN of THE SIDEWALKS sHOwN oN THIS PLAN rs SCI1EMAnC. A
G SANITARY SEWER EASEMENT .w \ 0J. 15 \ / / atr'.atP \ 1 qtt OF DURHAM/OR NCDOT ENCROACHMENT PERMIT IS REWIRED PAKJR TO
G ~ SEE NOTE "A". \ \ / / ~ , O ANY CONSiRUCiION, AFTER OBTARNNO THE REWIRW PERIHTS, PLEASE UUIIIIII I 1111111// , / / \ ~ , . , , ~ 1 CONTACT THE qtt aF WRHAM ENGINEERING CONSTRUCTION INSPECTION \ ~1 OFFlCE AT 5E0-4326 FCR A PRE-CONS71tUCilON COi~EAEI4CE AND A FlELD ~ ~ "'1 i
\ ~ ~ "A ~h' / / lA J ~ ~i \ 1 . , ' 'O, I NSIT PRIOR TO ANY WORK ON THE PROPOSED SIDEWALK. ? ~ i / PROPOSED 1 , , , , , , , G , ~i
G ~ CURVE 2 J ~ / I ¦ 10-00-47 ~ ~ J , \ / / CITY STORM 1 . , , 1~ NOTE 1' '9
R - 181.00' Q ~,~Ox ~j, 4~ L ¦ 31,83 / ~ QJ END TAPER X77 \ / DRAINAGE ~ , , ~ LOT 1 AS PER DEED B001t 435, PAGE e73-675 SHALL ~ suB,ECT To A ID TAPER ~•j \ / O,1 ' y 1~ PERPEIUN. CON1pNIN1fi SCENIC EASEMENT, 7HE PROPERTY MILL NOT BE USED SEAL 'A: 13+32,11 'y / ~ ~ EASEMENT " " ~ AT ANY TNIE FOR ANYIINNC OTHER THAN ONE SINGLE-FAMN.Y RESDE1111AL
G Dc ¦ 31-39-18 / STA: 13+32.11 Y, . b~ , OFFSET: 12.00 R J~v 1•SET: 12.00 R `A LOT 3 SEE NOTE C ~1 , , • y 1 DWELLING INTH SUpPgtTINO WTBUALDINGS sucH As A GARAGE oR PIRiP ~ ~ ~ 15456 ~
LOT 45 / ~ 8a / / PROPOSED 17 CITY / / 8~y, y ~1 , 1 , 1~ HWSE, ETC,). NO MOBN.E HOME CAN BE LOCATED ON LOT 1. ~.fi', ; ~ 81,888 SF , 6 ' ' . , ~ ' Q`•~
STORM DRAINAGE ~ 15,011 SF / •P \
EASEMENT ~ / / \ G NOTE "E"). Ct0\ / /BEGIN TAPER \ //nIIIIIIn11U PAPER \ \ •o~ o. ~ ~ ~ .
~ / ~ 0C STA: T 188.37 R \ t+68.37 \ d 1~ 1 1 F. \ ~ ~ ,o. 17.OOR \ \ 71 ~~0' 1 'r11
PROPOSED ~ 1M1~ / oFFSE ' \ 5' SIDEWALK / \ \ 0 9 G ~ ' ~ OPEN SPACE CALCULATION
NC~OT 4 / 1 4~ I \ •O ~ \ s0 c~`~"G 'y PROPOSED OPEN SPACE > F \ ~ 1 m
PROPOS D I I SIDEWAL \ ~ ' \ '~/C ~ y \ . . , . , l LOT AR A R IR \ ul.~ G.'.'.'.. \ 11 1 4 1
9~ ~o' Q \ q ti 1 ' ' 12 15 4 47 . \
(A ~
~o ~ ~ G a . A ~ ,x~ LOT OS ~ 18 17 897 LOT 1 \ •a ~ \ ~ lA• k 19 17 497
1 t~ S ~ ~ 106,78E d S 108,788 SF \ ~,y 20 17 1 71s
II ~ ~d o \ \ ? S?" 22 174 4 Z \ 9 0
o~ ~ T \ F \ 23 18 4 ~ \ . \ 24 1 4 1 0.
\ X10 x 70 PROPOSED \ \ ~ N \ 25 17 1 U
SIGHT CITY STORM \ ~ \ 28 17 7 13 w \ \ 27 148 1 Z o
~ TRIANGLE DRAINAGE EASEMENT ~ ~ T \ \ 28 1 4 40 Q
G, (TYP.) J ~ \ 1 29 1 4 0 4 (n
^ \ •,,~M 30 18 74 ~ \ •h \ 31 1 4 ~
/ \ / \ \ \ 0°j 8 LU y0• 40 t8 478 ~ \ \ 41 1 1 15
/ \ Jp,
~ / \ / , \ ~0' \ 42 14 7 1 \ ~G~ \ 43 1 7 7 4 43 ~
/ Sp, \ ~ •4' 44 `r0• \ 18 8 7 p
/ s ~ ~ s ~ / 45 1 11 49 9 \ ~ Fq \ ~ __J 1V~R
sO• ~ q0, _ _ _ _ c~ TOTAL OPEN SPACE REQUIRED: 79,407 SF (1,82 AC,) w
s~ 9G \'f _ _ _ . - _ PROPOSED OPEN SPACE: 115,989 SF (2.66 AC.) m ~ ~
F9 ~i \ z
~G \ PROPOSED IMPERVIOlS SURFACE CALCULATIONS: DATE: 4IO9IO2
295,77' \ IMPERVIOUS SURFACE MAY NOT EXCEED 24X OF LOT AREA,
\ SITE AREA: 1,200,697 SF JOB N0: 00208 CURVE TABLE MAX, IMPERVOUS SURFACE ALLOWED: 288,187 SF DRAWING:
CURVE TABLE CURVE LENGTH RADIUS CHORD DIRECTION CHORD ROADS: 75,794 SF 00-208-04 SIDEWALKS: 10,190 SF
LINE TABLE CURVE LENGTH RADIUS CHORD DIRECTION CHORD C43 33.41 25.00 S11' 1'57" 30.97 PUMP STATION: 7,717 SF DESIGNED: JWP
LINE BEARING LENGTH CURVE TABLE L1 1 CURVE LENGTH RADIUS CHORD DIRECTION C21 21,38 170.00 7' '51"W 21,37 C44 82,96 1026,18 S '39'55" 82,94 TOTAL MAX, IMPERVIWS SURFACE ALLOWED FOR LOTS: 194,488 SF
L2 Ci 281,86 976.16 7'47'4 "W 2 )RD DIRECTION CHORD C22 81.76 170.00 ' 6"W 80,98 C45 98,50 190,11 N3 '18'09'W 97,40 AVERAGE MAX, IMPERVIOUS SURFACE ALLOWED PER LOT: 4,522 SF DRAWN: LMH 7'47'4 "W 261,08 C23 80,00 170.00 '3 "W 59,89 C46 114,50 1026,16 S1190'41" 114.44 MAX, IMPERVOUS SURFACE ALLOWED PER LOT: 4,500 SF
l3 " C2 8.35 370.00 N7 ' '4 'W N7 ' '4 "W 8,35 C24 63,47 170.00 49 '47"E 83,10 C47 131,33 1026,18 S1 '02' 131,24 MAX, IMPERVIOUS SURFACE FOR LOT 3: 11,217 SF CHECKED:
L4 " C3 86,09 370.00 N7 '18'3 'W L5 7 • " C4 162.88 370.00 • T3 "W 1 N7 '18'3 "W 88,00 C25 16,18 170.00 17'44'03"E 18,17 C48 97,70 285.00 N1 '3 ' "W 97.22 HORIZONTAL SCALE: • T3 "W 161.57 C28 23,18 25.00 N '0 '1 " 22,38 C49 61,30 1026,18 '0 " 81,29
L6 ' 5' 'W 63,53 C27 71,94 50.00 SO ' '48"E 65,89 C50 81,00 1054.14 '17'1 " 80,99 1 - ti0
L7 " C5 63.61 370.00 5' 'W l8 " C8 23.18 25.00 N '13' 1" N 93' 1" 22,38 C28 85.71 50.00 N7 '53"E 61,08 C51 97,17 285,00 N '5 ' 1" 96,70 SYMBOL LEGEND VERTICAL SCALE:
L9 " C7 52.94 50.00 S8 7'2 'W " CS 83.00 50.00 S18'01'44'W S8 7'2 'W 50,50 C29 59,88 50.00 N03 '18"E 58,37 C52 13,75 1054.14 49 '0 " 13,75 NA S18'01'44'W 56,91 C30 37,28 50.00 N5 93'51"W 36.42 C53 50,00 285,00 N '44' 49.94
uo N~n•~~ 3a w R 17 - -
Lid , " , " C9 51.00 50.00 S4997'1 " S491 71 " 4952 C31 25.10 ZO.UU S47'0130"E zz3a c0+ 0030 zo0vu N 4W" 9 03.3u ¦ aAlzoimci WMAtin MUNUMGni vi IL-L- I J11%-f.
02 S20*27'36"E 19,00, C10 48.08 50.00 N7 56'29" N7 '56'29" 46.25 C32 134.36 235.00 N '44" 132.53 C55 148.64 1912.51 3 ' '41" 148.60 Q EXISTING IRON PIN N 6'27'35" 34.09 C33 133.13 235.00 N 413'48"W 131.36 C56 74.73 285.00 N47'0 ' 74.52
L13 S20*27'36"E 34,00' C11 34.79 50.00 N 6'27'35" L14 S20*27'36"E 34,09' C12 23.18 25.00 '05' "W '05' "W 22.36 C34 105.46 140.11 N4 1' 3"W 102.99 C57 25.54 285.00 N 7'05' 25.54 Q IRON PIN SET
L15 N26*24'50*E 39,36' C13 146.24 330.00 7 1'0 "W 1 7 1'p "W 145.04 C35 140.59 145.11 Sg 7' 7"W 135.16 C58 61.11 235.00 N 1 '27" 60.94
L18 S08*05'1 3"W 10.00, C14 132.77 330.00 N '34"W 1 L17 N30-20'33"W 50,00' C15 39.27 25.00 N ' 4' 0"W N '34"W 131.88 C36 172.31 130.00 S17' '40"W 159.97 C62 261.86 976.18 17'47'45"W 261.08 3 j N ' 4' 0"W 35.36 C37 15.34 156.00 S10' 4'16"W 15.34 C63 72.63 1004.14 '35'17" 72.61
L18 N39*43'22"E 5,13' C16 36.00 206.00 "W ' "W 35.95 C38 41.18 25.00 0' 4'39"W 36.68 C64 11.89 370.00 6 '34'42"W 11.89 SCALE 1" = 60'
L19 S71*42'05"W 20,80' C17 49.90 156.00 N17'1 ' 1" L20 N3o,35'4o"w 20,25' C18 33.26 25.00 N64 ' 1'4 " N171 ' 1" 49.69 C39 541.48 976.16 1'16" 534.57 C65 110.04 1962.51 27'3 '31" 110.02 N 4' 1'4 " 30.86 C40 93.09 1026.16 S04* 30'30"W 93.06 C66 93.43 1912.51 27'22'07" 93.42 60' 0 60' 120'
L22 N20"27*36.w 8,17' C19 63.36 185.11 N "W N "W 63.05 C41 94.18 1026.16 '4 '11" 94.15 C67 60.89 976.18 19'26"W 60.88 ~F 23
L23 C20 70.00 185.11 7 7 2'04"W S72-12'04'W 69.58 C42 65.89 208.00 N171 ' 1" 65.61 C68 13.35 130.00 "W 13.35

I` \ Z
01 I \ ~ p
z U \ ~ ~
\ w o!
ti OPEN SPACE B 1 z n
1 - z 1 U
LOT 10 Z 0 1 w U M
LOT 33 ~ - \ \
LOT 32 LOT 21 , i ~ a ~ \ ~ ~ w a
1 ~ ~ 1 x
b ~ h ~ Q
LOT 20 ~ LOT 9 w N LL a \ L.f 1 N M
~ LOT 11 ~ 00 ~ 1 1 ~ oU~ o
LOT 22 PE MANENT MINOR ~R ~ ~ ~ ~ZN c
D RSION. ICAL. SEE DETAIL. LLJ a = ^ 3 DETAIL. 1 w ~ ~ 0
1 ass ~ ~ o ~
LOT 19 ~ ~~a
LOT 31 LOT 34 1 I e w Z U m w
4 ~ Z ~U 1 I = Sao ~ z o=>
I I ~Q
I LOT 8 Q ~
I
e 1
LOT 23 1 I LOT 12
LOT 18 I ~ r lb ~
LOT 35 LOT 30 4 ~ o~naN ~
LOT 24 7 ~ 4 ~ 31 ~ •g ~7
y5 1~
,r \ 3 l~ LOT
5
~ ~
• \
9 ~ 12 LOT 29 , 3
~
LOT 36 s
LOT 17 LOT 17 w~hawN~is ? H 1
~ LOT 25 o 1 ~ LOT 6
1
s~ oer~- 4 1 ~ p~Wria a ~s 4a
~ ~ i
~ ~ PERMANENT MEDIUM • \ ~ ~ DIVERSION,
® LOT 37 ~ LOT 28 LOT LOT 16 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~o ~ ~ ~ TYPICAL. SEE DETAIL,
` w,rawuu eo ~ OE1D1110N ~ ~ ~
LOT 27 s LOT 26 W 4 a
W ~ J
3 18 N \ Ss
\ ~ FUTURE
\ DEVELOPMENT LOT 13 , \
8 LOT 39 4 LOT 15 \ \ LOT 15 \
LOT 40 a ~ ~ ~
5 OE1EN110N
b 3 1 J3~

~ LOT 41 ~A ~ ~
\ ' LOT 14 ss 41 ' , , r H
~ vw I 4
LOT 42 LOT 43 v I ~
1 8 ` ~ ss s A
s ~ ~ \ ~
f i ~
\ ~ ~
A~ G A 1 ~ ~ 4
G 1 w ~ ~ w
LOT 44 yS ~v \ 1 w ~
LOT 2 ~ 1
T RM RAINAGE STRUCTURES TABLE ~ S 0 D ws STRUCTURE TOP INV. IN INV. OUT REMARKS ~ iu 1 1 ,
W-. w CI 1 397.30 390.30 N 1 1 1 1 ~s
CI 2 397.30 390.10 S 389.90 NE ",ss LOT 45 1 1 1 1
CI 3 391.80 385.0 S 384.80 SE G 1 1
CI 4 391.80 384.60 N 379.00 SE STORM DRAINAGE PIPE TABLE i 1 1
JB 5 388.00 373.50 NW 373.30 SE T FES 6 371.00 CLASS "B" RIPRAP APRON - 12'Lx6'Wx8"TH TO DIA. A . LENGTH SLOPE a / 1 1 1 w 1 ~ 1
CI 1 CI 2 15 RCP 21 1.OX ~ W " ~ ~s LOT 3 ~ ~
CI 7 382.00 374.40 W CI 2 CI 3 15 RCP 167 2.9X 1b CI 3 CI 4 15" RCP 21' 1,OX ,ti ~ 1 ~
CI B ~ ~ ~ 382.00 374.20E 374.00 NW CI 4 JB 5 15" RCP 55' 10.OX W / 1 1 ,
CI 9 377.00 369.60 SE 369.40 N JB 5 FES 6 15" RCP 83' 2.8X CI 10 375.00 367.70 S ~ ~ ~ ~ m 1 1
CI 11 375.00 367.50 N 367.30 W " ~ ~ ~ t 1
CI 7 CI 8 15 RCP 21 1.OX !y 367.50 SE CI 8 q 9 15" RCP 96' 4.6X r"~ ~ \
FES 12 370.00 CI 9 q 11 15" RCP 78' 2.4X X54 ~ ,r 1 \ ~ ~ \
CI 13 376.00 366.70 E 366.50 N " , CI 10 q 11 15 RCP 21 1.OX `,1
367.50 S q 11 q 13 15" RCP 62' 1.OX 11 14 364.00 360.20E FES 12 hti ~ 1
113 18 RCP 25 10.0% YI 15 363.00 358.30 358.10E , o ~ ~ LOT 1 / ~
CI 13 YI 15 24 RCP 130 6.3X 358.30 S YI 14 YI 15 15" RCP 33' S.BX ~ - / \ a
YI16 367.00 356.80 356.60 " , / U JS f ~ N A ~ ~ W
FES 17 356.00 CLASS "B" RIPRAP APRON - 12'Lx6'Wx14"TH ~ 15 YI 16 24" RCP 63 2.1X ~ ~ OE1Q111 d YI 16 FES 17 24 RCP 62 1.OX d a F \ Z D ~9 ~ ` \ 0
RISER 18 360.00 355.90 " ~9 1 RISER 8 FES 19 15 RCP 89 1.OX ~ FES 19 355.00 CLASS "A" RIPRAP APRON - 6'Lx5'Wx6"TH i. \ -
. ,,a ~ r~ • ~ ~ -
CI 20 q 21 15" RCP 21' 1.OX CI 20 360,90 354,0 SE CI 21 ' W
CI 21 360.90 353.80 N 353.60 E q 22 15 RCP 31 1.3X CI 22 q 24 15" RCP 162' 3.2X p(, ~ 3 9' \
CI 22 358.20 353.40 W 353.20 SE " , FES 23 q 24 30 RCP 35 2.OX FES 23 347.00 " ,
CI 24 q 25 30 RCP 29 1.OX ~ CI 24 352.90 346.10 NW 346.00 NE " ~ \ w t: ~
CI 25 FES 28 30 RCP 60 1.OX 346.30 SW YI 27 FES 28 15" RCP 45' 1.0X 9 \ o \ ;
CI 25 352.90 344.70 S 339.60 N PIPE 28 FES 30 15" RCP 38' 1.OX V ~ ~
FES 26 339.00 CLASS "B" RIPRAP APRON - 18'Lx8'Wx14"TH ~ w ~ m
YI27 354.50 339.50 " , " " _ 'Wx .TM 11 31 FES 32 15 RCP 35 1.OX FES 28 339.00 CLASS A RIPRAP APRON 6 Lx5 6 PIPE 33 FES 34 15" RCP 45' 1.OX \ ~
PIPE 29 338.50 \ z
FES 30 338.10 CLASS "A" RIPRAP APRON - 6'Lx5'Wx6"TH DOUBLE CI 35 q 36 15" RCP 21' 1.OX ` ~ s \ DATE: ~ 4!09102
CI 36 FES 37 15" RCP 85' 1.OX \ JOB No: 00208
YI 31 356.50 351.30 N FES 38 YI 39 15" RCP 76' 10.2X \ DRAWING: 00-208-04
FES 32 351.00 CLASS "A" RIPRAP APRON - 6'Lx5'Wx6"TH yl 39 FES 40 15" RCP 49' 1.OX PIPE 33 350.40 PIPE 41 FES 42 15" RCP 46' 1.0X ~ ~
FES 34 349.90 CLASS "A" RIPRAP APRON - 6'Lx5'Wx6"TH DESIGNED: SJB
YI 43 FES 44 15" RCP 24' 1.OX DRAWN: LMHISJB
DOUBLE CI 35 349.50 340.00 N PIPE 45 FES 46 15" RCP 67' 1.OX CHECKED:
CI 36 349.50 339.80 S 337.90 E FES 37 337.00 CLASS "A" RIPRAP APRON - 6'Lx5'Wx6"TH FES 47 S 48 54" RCP 54' 0.30X
FE HOR120NTAL SCALE: 1"=60'
FES 38 347.00 VERTICAL SCALE:
YI 39 341.00 33s.2o sE 337.50 w HEADWALLS AND WINGWALLS NOTE: NA
FES 40 337.00 CLASS "A" RIPRAP APRON - 6'Lx5'Wx6"TH
PIPE 41 336.40 THESE PLANS SHOW THE PROPOSED CROSSING OF A NEUSE RIPARIAN STREAM AND BUFFER FES 42 336.00 CLASS "A" RIPRAP APRON - 6'Lx5'Wx6"TH FOR BLACKSTONE DRIVE. IN ORDER TO AVOID COSTLY MITIGATIONS, IT IS NECESSARY SHEET N0.
T~ I IIIIT 111CTIIRpANCF AC TLIG OCnRFWFNT1f1NC11 CTRFAII iiIIFFFR Tf1 IIAdOT IC C41f1WN
THIS REQUIRES THAT TALLER HEADWALLS (12' INVERT-TOP), AND LONGER 30 DEGREE
YI 43 340.00 337.30 NE WINGWALLS (20' MAX.) MUST BE CONSTRUCTED. THERE ARE NO KNOWN STANDARD DETAILS
FES 44 337.00 CLASS "A" RIPRAP APRON - 6'Lx5'Wx6"TH FOR THIS APPLICATION. IT WILL BE NECESSARY FOR THE DEVELOPER TO HIRE A SCALE 1" = 60' 1 7
PIPE 45 336.60 STRUCTURAL ENGINEER TO DESIGN CONSTRUCTION DETAILS OF THESE HEADWALLS AND FES 46 336.00 CLASS "A" RIPRAP APRON - 6'Lx5'Wx6"TH WINGWALLS, CUSTOMIZED TO FIT THE SITUATION. THESE DETAILS MUST BE DESIGNED
AND SUBMITTED TO CITY OF DURHAM ENGINEERING AND STORMWATER FOR APPROVAL 60' 0 60' 120'
FES 47 336.10 CONCRETE CHANNEL - SEE DETAIL. PRIOR TO BEGINNING ANY CONSTRUCTION. A RAILING MUST BE INSTALLED AT THE TOP OF THE WALLS. SEE RAILING DETAIL.
FES 48 335.90 CLASS "B" RIPRAP APRON - 27 Lx14 Wx12"TH OF 23

N \ N30'2o'33"w CLUSTER SUBDIVISION DATA Z N3o'2o' " TOTAL AREA: 30.34 ACRES (1,321,649 SF)
' ~ N30'20'33"W ' 0'33"W N '20'33"W I N3o'20'33"W N30'20 33 W 238,87' 86.22' 0
157,15' Lt 146.02' 131.60' 271,38' " G ',178.0'4,' ~ N30'20 33 W , , \ AREA IN NEW STREETS: 3.05 ACRES Z ~ AREA IN OPEN SPACE: 2.66 ACRES ~ U
to ~ 103,40' r -I o r ~ ~ ~ f0 _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ' 'OPEN SPACE A , , , ~ ~ ,o OPEN SPACE H ~ m - - - - - - - ~ ' ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ - - - - - - - - - - - - - ~ - - ~ AREA IN FUTURE DEVELOPMENT: 2.78 ACRES w ~ ~ ~
~ I I ~ ~ l- '~'67 817 SF'~'•' I I o ~N I •N 3 N I 18 N 11,411 SF ~ I I •??°3~PZ;'YV:•' ','o' . y I \ AREA IN LOTS: 21,85 ACRES w ~ 13 p Z N •o
~ ' I I ~ TOT LOT f , , , ','9 ~ I \ 6 8 TOTAL NUMBER OF LOTS: 43 Z ~ ~ Ina ~ AVERAGE LOT SIZE: 22134 SF 0 ~
~ I I ~ o f I N Z ,'z \ LOT 10 NI \ p~ ' z 0 G tii~ I \ ~ Sj ZONING: R-20 w U M
a LOT 33 w ~ I I I ! , , Z I I ~ m LOT 32 LOT 21 ~ , , , , 20,030 SF ~ 8 N I N30'20'33 W \ I .W ! , , , , ~ ~ i ~ . 0 295 SF ~ I > _ I. ~ J;'~ 2 , I \ ~ WATERSHED DISTRICT; E B WATERSHED G ~ ~ ~
1 I ~ 8 ~ I 20,005 SF 7,98 - Z 22,288 SF , ~ ~y, F I 1 i,~ INSIDE CITY LIMITS, INSIDE UGA o a , \ \ ~
I I \ ~ p, , / pal Z 9 ~ I LOT 9 \ ~ PROPOSED USE: RESIDENTIAL W a y MINIMUM EXTERIOR LOT SIZE: 20,000 SF m ~
N ~o I \ s,* ~ \ 12 I \ ' cr ~ w L 20,178 SF \ ~ x , ~ v i ~ MINIMUM EXTERIOR LOT WIDTH: 100 ? ~ LL
~t I I 8 „ 2• \ LOT 20 / o.~ ~ , ~ \ \ EXTERIOR LOT MINIMUM SETBACKS: 35' FRONT' w cv
~ L------J ~ I \ 117281 SF / / ~ 182,33 ~ ~ ~ ~ ' '0'. , , , , ' I LOT 22 p = ~ I /pRDPO$ED 30 ~ „ \ 30 TOTAL SIDE;12 SIDE ~ oD i;
N30 0'33"w ~ '9' „ ~ ~ m _ 146. _ _ I 17,446 SF ~ ,Fv I / /CITY OF DURHAM LOT 11 \ 17. ' TR T o U ~ 0 ~ \ ~ 5 S EE SIDE; 25 REAR w z ~ 15388 SF - ~
m ~ r - - - - - / / / SANITARY SEWER '9y \ I ( I ~ ~ A MENT , } c ,2g*w MINIMUM INTERIOR LOT SIZE: 10,000 SF w ~ 0 ~ ~
a N N I I z I ~ E~ o ,~c \ ' I I Y I t o0 5 ~ SEE NOTE A '.n ~ , , ( N37'S2 MINIMUM INTERIOR LOT WIDTH: 50' ~ ~ 0 ~ ~ ~ '
~ ~ LOT 34 I ~ g I I ~ ~ ~ ~ / c \ ~ ~ , , , , 137.42 _ ~ o_ 0 .U , I _ f- ~ ~ _ _ _ ~1 INTERIOR LOT MINIMUM SETBACKS: 17,5 FRONT; 0 0 ~ ~ o
o ~ ~o LOT 31 I ~ ~ ~ I ~'w _ t t LOT 19 ~ \ , , ) I 20,014 SF I o w I o ~ I e os.tr ~k , , , , z ~ ~ „ 15,332 SF I a; ~ J 17,503 SF / / 1 , , ) r 1' T T 7 U 0 ~ 8 I 5 0 AL SIDE; .5 SIDE w Z U m w
I I o gN I $N I J i \ / W I I ~ ~ \ / v I , r~ ^ I ti 17,5' STREET SIDE; 12.5 REAR ~ Z o ~ ~ , ~ ' 9~ I 2 0 -i 0
b ~ ~I ~ / , \ / I .55~~~1 cl ~ U Z o 2> 41- LOT 8 I a Q \ ~ ; STREET CONSTRUCTION DATA ~ J
N30'20 33 W I ~ ~ i \ ~ ? / \ 20,055 SF ~ LENGTH OF NEW STREETS: 2635 LF TOTAL Q
2oa,a1' I ~ ~ LOT 23 \ ~ ~ / , , , , ~ ~ I STREET CONSTRUC110N IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CITY OF - /
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ LOT 18 ~ „ '~N - - - - N3o'zo'33"w ~ ~ ~ c , , , ~ 16 580 SF ~ , , , , , ~ ~ I DURHAM STANDARDS. LOT 12 ~
a ~ 146.02' 17,303 SF , , , , , , I I N I ~ LOT 24 \ \ , y I \ 1 „ i r~ 15,353 SF " NOTE •A•
1 I f W `'o z ~ \ . a PROPOSED 30 CITY I cnl 18,634 SF \ ~ \ \ $30'20 33 E PROPOSED 30 F00T NN7E a1Y OF DURHAM SANITARY SENER EASEMENT,
LOT 35 8 ~o I s~ ~o a 1 , , , , , ~ I I ~ m N , OF DURHAM SANITARY ~ d , , , , I 21,51 SF I ~ I LOT 30 F SEWER EASEMENT A CURVE 4 „ 229.70' SUBJECT TO 7E1tMS STATED N THE DECLARAnON N REAL ESTATE BOOK - ~ 1510, PAGE 95a NO SiRUCTURES, FlLL, EMBANKMENTS, iREES OR
t0• SEE NOTE A" ~ N) i ¦ 81-49-40 \ / " , , , I I PT 21+8a49 16,026 SF ( R ¦ 1S0,pp~ ~q3 E , , , , , ~ / - - - - - - - a OBSTRUC110NS PERMITTED N11HN THE T % T N 8 1 EASEMEN E CEP ACCORq G TO n1osE 1ERMS.
I m~ L ¦ 214.22' \ 840'07 ~ \ , PROPOSED I L20 CITY STORM ~ More 'e"
o+ L-------------J 1, Dc¦38-t1-SO ' 151,60 , I \ I I DRAINAGE EASEME ~3 LOT 7 I STREAM BUFFER: SO FOOT YADE uNgsTURBED STREAM BUFFER EACH SIDE , \ . a0 Z a' STREAM, MEASURED FROM TOP OF BANK, NO CLEARNO OR GRADING
S30'20'33"E ~ ~ ~ ~ n , I ~ , ~ s2o~r " " 8 N , 228,89 0 ~ , ~ t? 38 E ~ EE NOTE C ~ 28 249 SF I + OTHER THAN saECnvE THNNNO AND oRgNARY MNNTENANae aF E1NSiNC M ~ ~ ~ VEOETAnON PERIMTTED. u
I g6,~i FT¦ / a - - 1 ~ ~1~ / 138.04 t 19.40 ~ , ~ PROPOSED 16' CITY .o b 1~
r z I ~ LOT 29 / p I \ \ Z I STORM DRAINAGE EASEMENT ~ N „ ~ PROPOSED id FOOT WA1E PUBLIC STORM WATER DRANACE EASEMENT, , , , 'J6'OI"E _ - - _ J (SEE NOTE "c"). owNERSHIP a', AND AESPON91BIUrr FOR IMPROVEMENT AND MuN1ENANCE
I ~ , 11~~00 15,420 SF / PROPOSED 16 ~ ~ ~ d: STORM WATER FACNlnES N THIS EASEMENT REMANS Nlnl THE , , , , ' ' ~ » GRANTOR. IF 111E PROPERTY IS 1MTNN OR BECOMES A PART OF 1HE aTY,
1 I ~ / CITY STORM ~ ~ ~ ~ I LOT 17 3 LOT 36 \ / \ DRAINAGE EASEMENT N ~ N I 22,002 SF ;PROPOSED 32 ' 530'20 33 E THE EASEMENT „ AND ACCESS PONTS TD THE EASEMENT ARE SUBJECT TO ','CITY STORM DRAINAGE'' 280.88 THE TERNS AND RESTINCTIONS STALED 1N THE •REVSED DECLARAnat OF
~ 25 371 SF ~ \ PROPOSED 16 CITY ~ \ (SEE NOTE C • ~ ~ I \ , , , 8 $ - - - - - - - _ RK~tTS AND PINVnEGES aF THE an of ouRHAM N sTGRM wA1ER \ • EASEMENT,'," ~ o } _ _ - - - - - -
a I STORM DRAINAGE ~ I m m ~ e~ LOT 28 \ LOT 25 ~ I , ~ I EASEMENT / \ I ~ . , NOTE "D" , ~ ~ 1 MANAGEMENT FACILITY EASEMENTS" RECORDED N REAL ESTAn: BOOK 7198, , \ PACE 208, YANa1 DOCUMENT IS INCORPORATED HEREIN. 1HIS EASEMENT
to I i, , ~ \ (SEE NOTE "D"), / ` ~w 17,487 SF 17,931 SF _ _ _ _ _ _ LOT 8 I z AND REVISm oEaARAnoN DG Nor CREATE THE aeuoAnaN ro PROVIDE , ~ m PUBLIC MANIENANCE NO BULDINOS, STRUCTURES, FlLLS, EMBANKMENTS OR
I ~ ~ NaZ 55 G ~ . \ / - ~ N M to y Pc 13+97,94 g - - - - - - - • \ 30,335 SF I r3 aESTRUCnoNS PERMITTED TA1HN THE EASEMENT EXCEPT Ac~aRaNC ro , , , S ,o THOSE TERMS
\ / / LOT 28 ~ ~ f j~ ~ ~ \ \ / ~ ~ N ~o w I PROPOSED ~ e;, , , , , , PROPOSED 30' CITY } • N, Non: ro•
" \ / 15,36 SF ~ , N I CITY STORM \ t ~'i ~ a I N1 . STORM DRAINAGE EASEMENT ~ PRavosFD ~ Foot w1DE Pueuc sraRM wArER atuNACE EASEMENT, \ 83g 0f \ » » } ONTERSIIP OF, AND RESPONSEIUTY FOR IMPROVEMENT AND MNNIENANCE
a25 ~ / I I I DRAINAGE EASEMENT \ LOT 37 q, / CURVE 8 ~ / R LOT 16 :MENT \ , , \ (SEE NOTE D aF sTaRM wATER FAaunES N TH1s EASEMENT REMANS IRTH THE \ ~ aRANraR. ~ n1E PIta~ERTV 1s rNTHN a: BECaMES A PART of THE aTY,
a21 / i ¦ eo-o7-D3 z cuRVE s ~ \ ~+c 1 I I LOT 27 I / / Sr ~ ~ R ¦ 2eaoo' I i • 9e-to-2a \ 23,024 SF 23,813 SF / \ I R . , 1t' \ OFFSET: 12aD R ! ' `S,t'.'. \ ~ THE EASEMENT ANO ACCESS POINTS TO THE EASEMENT ARE SUBJECT TO , ~ THE TERMS AND RESiRICTAN4 STALED IN THE 'REVISED DECLARAnON OF
/ \ L ¦ 38368' I I 18,462 SF I es. / / / \ ~ pc - 22-02-1 I L - 26290' \ \ ,ry0 \ - RIGHTS AND PRIVNEOES OF nIE aTY OF DURHAM N STORM WATER 8 •~0 ~04~, ^ . , ~ \ , " MANAGEMENT FACILITY EASEMENTS' RECORDED N REAL ESTATE BOOK 7198,
/ / ` I I Dc ¦ 34-42-07 / ` k / / ~ I 1 ~ \ \ ~ ~o ~ I / ~ ,1Q Ck ~ ' tT. ~ \ N4 h PAGE 208, WHN3i DOa1ME11T E INCORPORAIEO HEREIN, THIS EASEMENT ' AND REVISED DECLARAnON DO NOT ptEATE THE OBLIGAnON TO PROVDE
/ / LOT 39 ~ I I ~ ~ \ / ~ ti / / X33 ~ I + END MIDENINC ~ ~ ~ ~,~'V A ~I~C.F.~ Os , , , 200 PL6UC MANIENANCE NO BUILgNGS, STRUCTURES, FlLLS, EMBANKMENTS at u A M , . OBS1RUCnONS PEAMITiED YA1HN 1HE EASEMENT EXCEPT ACCORgNO TO t~
23 321 SF ~ J m ~ LOT ' ! / / , I I su is+6667 v ~ ~,F? LOT 13 soFq Ge ~ • • 1 FUTURE DEVELOPMENT n1osE tE1>MS. 17 927 SF A~' . , \
W $ / / / \ os ~ - . , ; OFFSET: 13,ao R ~ / ~ ' , 17 9R ~ ~'F 120,952 SF 'E' ~ ti , . , \ PROPOSED 17 FOOT MADE PUBLIC STORM WATER DRAINAGE EASEMENT.
4 / / / \ \ / LOT 15 ~ ~ , . CURVE 1 ? \ ~ , . ONNERSHIP OF, AND RESPONSIBILITY FOR IMPROVEMENT AND MNNTENANCE ~ I ¦ 48-28-33 \ , • \ OF STORM WATER FAgLInES IN TENS EASEMENT REMAINS WI1H THE
/ / / LOT 40 \ ~ oo a I / / / / \ 20,520 SF ~ ~ R ; R ¦ 330,00' / \ GRANTOR, IF THE PROPERTY IS 1M1HIN OR BECOMES A PART a' THE aTY, L ¦ 295.92' / R \ , . \ THE EASEMENT ANp ACCESS PONTS TO THE EASEMENT ARE SUBJECT TO
3 / PROPOSED 30 CITY OF / 16,522 SF / / S?0 CURVE 3 ~ ~ n \ Dc ~ DC ¦ 18-22-1 , . \ 1HE lER1AS AND RES11NCnON3 STALED IN THE 'REVISED DECLARAnON OF 8 RNNTS AND PRIVNJEDES OF THE d1Y OF DURHAM N STORM WATER
, I / / DURHAM SANITARY / ~ ~"E 17 to p0 I ¦ 18-t9-37 / \ ,t, ~ ~ SEWER EASEMENT ~ / ~ ~ ~ ~ ti R . 181,00' / / \ ~ g+ g / \ \ MANAGEMENT fACR1TY EASEMENTS" RECORDED N REAL ESTATE BOOK 2298, ~ ~ / PAGE 208, WHN31 DOCUMENT q INCORPORATED HEREN, nNS EASEMENT
N ~ I / " » / PROPOSED t6 CITY ~ a~ \ , is L ¦ 57,90' ~ ~ ~ (SEE NOTE A / ~ ~ ~ • p~ \ ~ Dc ¦ 31-39-i8 / / \ ~ a f / STORM DRAINAGE ~ „ xti / / ~ PROPOSED \ \ AND aEVISED DEaARAnaN Do NoT CREATE THE OBL10AnOt1 TO PRGViDE
ti LOT 38 ~ / EASEMENT ~ 4 ,`o, I » . 1 124.0 ~ ~ / \ ~ ~ / CITY STORM , , , , } PIA3LIC MANIENANCE NO BUILDINGS, SiRUCTURES, FlL1S, EMBANKMENTS OR \ Q3S11R1CnONS PERLg71ED YATHN THE EASEMENT EXCEPT ACCORDNC TO \ \ DRAINAGE EASEMENT \ I TMo~ iERMS
~ / SEE NOTE D r ` - . , 9 ~ ~ 0 \ / 22,205 SF ( ) R _ , / \ I E'YN ~
LOT 41 A C _ , ~ . / \ ~ ~ ~ ~ v LE r ~ \ \ I + NGTE 'F'
~ 13,185 SF ~g PROPOSED ~ / P ~ ~ UBLtC S / / \ . , , . Au LGTS To BE SERVICED eY 141BLIC 9ENER AND wATEII N a
~ J~ 5 SIDEWALK ? C LOT 14 / I 1 C85 ` / \ ~ / / / 1 ~ / / 4 STREET AND aNVTLrNIY IIPACr >D ~AIBMI NAROI lIN1 KGIARE ~ ; ~F I I APPROVx FRGM N, c DnaaN a IrNTe~ auam
~ / 20,246 SF e I LOT 42 ! / \ bs, / ~e k9 ~ I ~
$ o l• / / \ 'se ~s• / / d 14,387 SF LOT 43 / \ s• ~r / Q~9 fat . , NOTE ht• . ~13g I , . , \ FlNAL PLAT AND DEED DEDICATNG RIGHT of WAY TO BE RECORDED PItlOR TO
~ ! 15,757 SF / / ! \ \ R ~PQO, ~ ? , , THE ISSUANCE OF tNALDING PERANr.
~ ! / LOT 44 ~ A / ~ ~ s ! c, ~ / ~ / 18 298 SF \ ~ 1 6 1 NDTE r ~ ~ ~ \ I , Ncoor ORIIENi rollrr RgARD PT9at To ooNST~,cT1GN.
\ \ . , \PROPOSED NGTE't
" " PROPOSE ~ ~ o, / ~ G OPEN SPACE C / / 0 30 ,s ~ / ~ / G ~ CITY OF DURHAM ~ ~ \ Z ' ~ , i;1TY STORM Lor i suu xAVC to GNECr ACCEf4 TO aESS Ra / LOT 2 \ ~ • , , RAINAGE EASEMENT
G 36,741 SF / IT \ F ~ SAN ARY SEWER ~ a. \ . , , q NOTE ,r 21,588 SF . , 1IE LOCATION aF nE sAEwA<xs SHOYN oN iH15 PLAN 1s BCIELUna A
G EASEMENT .~v \ ~~i• t5 \ \ / / ''u'. as \ I aTY aF gRNtAM~bR NCDOT QtCROAa1MEN7 PERINT ~ AEOURED PRIOR TO \ / / i^ . , ' ANY COrISTRUCTIDN. AFTER OBTAINNG nE REDLINED PERMTS PLEASE `1111 n I n rr qU
G ~ SEE NOTE "A". .hh \ \ \ ~ ~ ~ ~ / / \ , , . , . , to axlrACr nE aTY aF aNN1AM ENawEERNG ~ NsPECnoN ``~~V ri'~~ \ / , . , OFFlCE AT 580-328 Fat APRE-CONSIRUC110N CONFERENCE AND A FlEID ~ ""'?Q/ i
~ ~y. G o~ s CURVE 2 + ~ / \ / PROPOSED 1 } . , IG Msrr PRIOR TO ANY PARK ON iNE PROP09ED 9AEWNJL • , / \ ~ i
I ¦ 10-00-47 ~ , R ¦ 181.00' Q ~,~p°f T ti / / CITY STORM I 1~ Norf ';9 ; \ / DRAINAGE ~ ~ LoT i AS PER DEED BOOK PAGE a7s-N7s sHU.L BE sueJECT To A
47 L ¦ 31,83' / I ~ STk 13+3211 ~~f R ~1 \ / O,I ' Y IZCf PERPETUAL CatnNUNO SCE?UC EASEMENT, 7HE PROPERTY WAL NOT BE USED SEAL I2.ii ~ ~Y~, / 1,~ % EASEMENT „ » I .'A AT ANY nME FOIL ANYTHwc onER THAN ONE s91GU:-fAMN.Y RESIDENnAL
•CP , OFFSET: 1200 R ~9• 20o R ~ / LOT 3 SEE NOTE C ~ . , . • y I Dw]J.NG wTH SUPPORTNG OUiBUNJ7NVGS SUCH AS A GARAGE aR PUMP - 15456 ; Q;. F y I I~ HOUSE, ETC.} NO NOBNE HOME CAN BE LOCATED ON LOT i, :
LOT 45 / F / / PROPOSED 17' CITY / a1 ry~ti n 81,888 SF l-
STORM DRAINAGE 15,011 SF / ~ 'P / \ EASEMENT ~ / / \
G " M ~ / 1~ /BEaN rAAER \ NOTE E tp\ / ~ STk 12+88.37 \
~ 51 ~ ~ / OFFSET: 17,00 R \ PROPOSED ~ ,,ti'~ \ \ z•1 ~o ' 1 ,y,
5' SIDEWALK / \ 9 G , , . ~ OPEN SPACE CALCULATION \ ti >
NCQ~OT 4 / \ 1 G~ PROPOS D ~ ~ 1y S \ ~'y••••~•••••'•'•'•'.'. ~ PROPO D OPEN SPACE
I I SIDEWAL \ ~ ' ,I ~0 \ ti/C WI^y } ' , , } LOT A R IRED SF \ F to ~ GI.;.;.. \ 11 1 4 812
~ fi•,,,..' 1 4 847
(A ~ '~o G G a \ tt' ~ } • \ 13 17 7 7
. A U LOT 1 Os LOT 1 ~ 1e 17 7 \ •a ~ \ 19 17 497
~ 1 S ~ 106,786 SF 108 788 SF tii ~ 20 17 1 719 \ ? Sys' z
11 ~ ~d o \ \ ~ 22 17 5 4 O \ t~• F \ 23 1 3 4 0 I-
~ ~ ~ T \ \ \ . \ 24 1 4 13 8
~r \ A 10' X 70' '~p \ \ PROPOSED \ \ 25 17 1 9 U
SIGHT CITY STORM \ ~ \ 28 17 7 13 ~ w \ A°'' 27 1 1 Z ~ \ \ O
' . '~f TRIANGLE DRAINAGE EASEMENT s ~ ~ (TYP,) \ \ 28 1 4 40
J „ \ ~ 29 1 4 4 (n \ } 30 18 B 974 -
/ / \ i \ ,a3', \ 31 15 4 888 LU
/ \ \ \ ti 40 1 47 \ \ ~ ~
/ \~o. 41 1 1 8 81 \ 42 14 7 1
~ \6 / \~~l \ BG~ \ 43 1 7 7 4 43 w
/ \~~1~ `SO• \ 1 3 702 p S C / 45 1 11 4 989
~ m Fq ~ \ ~ ~
'so' s m~ 4j \ q _ _ . _ ~ TOTAL OPEN SPACE REQUIRED: 79,407 SF (1.82 AC.) w 9 . - - _ PROPOSED OPEN SPACE: 115,989 SF (2,88 AC,) m ~ _ ~
~F F~ \ i
~G , \ PROPOSED IMPERVIOUS SURFACE CALCULATIONS: DATE: 4IO9IO2
295.77' \ IMPERVIOUS SURFACE MAY NOT EXCEED 24X OF LOT AREA. \ SITE AREA: 1,200,897 SF JOB NO: 00208
CURVE TABLE MAX. IMPERVIOUS SURFACE ALLOWED: 288,187 SF
CURVE TABLE IR ~ ROADS: 75,794 SF DRAWING: 00-208-04 CURVE LENGTH RADIUS CHORD D EC ON CHORD SIDEWALKS: 10,190 SF
LINE TABLE LINE BEARING LENGTH CURVE TABLE CURVE LENGTH RADIUS CHORD DIRECTION CHORD C43 33.41 25,00 11'51'57" 30.97 PUMP STATION: 7,717 SF DESIGNED: ~~yP
Lt CURVE LENGTH RADIUS CHORD DIRECTION CHORD C21 21,38 170.00 7' ' 1"W 21,37 C44 82.98 1028.18 0 '3 '55" 82.94 TOTAL MAX. IMPERVIOUS SURFACE ALLOWED FOR LOTS: 194,468 SF IECTION CHORD C22 81.76 170.00 "W 80,98 C45 98.50 190,11 N 98'0 "W 97.40 AVERAGE MAX, IMPERVIOUS SURFACE ALLOWED PER LOT: 4,522 SF DRAWN: LMH
L2 C1 281.88 978.16 S17'47' "W 281,08 "W 281,08 C23 80.00 170.00 "W 59.89 C48 114.50 1026.18 S1190'41" 114.44 MAX. IMPERVIOUS SURFACE ALLOWED PER LOT: 4,500 SF
L3 " C2 8.35 370,00 N7 ' "w 8.35 L4 ' C3 86.09 370.00 N718'38"W 88,00 "W 8.35 C24 83,47 170.00 49 '47" 83.10 C47 131.33 1026.18 S1 '0 ' 131.24 MAX IMPERVIOUS SURFACE FOR LOT 3: 11,217 SF CHECKED: '38"W 88,00 C25 18,18 170.00 1744' 18.17 C48 97.70 285,00 N1 "W 97,22 HORIZONTAL SCALE:
L5 ' 39"w 181,57 C28 23.18 25.00 N 't " 22.38 C49 81.30 1026,18 ' 8" 81,29 1" = 60'
LB " C4 162.88 370.00 S ' 7'39"w 181,57 " C5 83.61 370,00 S8 5' 8"W 83,53 U C8 23.18 25.00 N86'13' 1" 22.38 8"W 83,53 C27 71,94 50.00 85,89 C50 81.00 1054.14 $ 9T1 ' 80,99
L8 ' 1" 22.38 C28 85.71 50.00 N7 81.08 C51 97.17 285.00 N '51' 96.70 SYMBOL LEGEND VERTICAL SCALE: 33"W 50.50 C29 59,88 50.00 N '1 " 58.37 C52 13.75 1054,14 49 ' 13.75 NA
L9 " C7 52,94 50.00 S 7'23"W 50.50 L10 ~ ~ 83.00 50,00 1 1'44"W 58,91 '44"W 58,91 C30 37,28 50.00 N 9 ' 1"W 36.42 C53 50.00 285.00 N2 '44' 49.94
ro a nn Fn nn c.e„vo"r dA A~ ~Me"e dAA7 Ott 7.'~1A 75.nn et•r•nt'zn"c 77_'iR f`5l .ri3..1R 7A.ri_fN1 uurYaa•c fi1.3n ¦ FYISTINn (:fNJCAFIF MANUMFNT SHEET N0.
'42"E 21.00* ' , C10 48.08 50.00 N73'56'29" 46.25 '29" 46.25 C32 134.36 235.00 N '44" 132.53 C55 148.64 1912,51 '5'41' 148.60Q EXISTING IRON PIN
L12 S20*2736"E 19,00, L13 Ctt 34.79 50,00 N 6'27'35" 34,09 S20*27'36"E 34,00' '35" 34,09 C33 133,13 235.00 N 4'1 3'48"W 131,36 C56 74.73 285.00 N4 '36` 74,52
S20*27'36"E 34,09' C12 23.18 25.00 S 3'05' "W 22.36 L14 33"W 22,36 C34 105.46 140.11 N4 '01' "W 102.99 C57 25.54 285.00 N57'05'23" 25.54 0 IRON PIN SET
L15 26-24-50-E 39,36' C13 146,24 330.00 S7 2'21'09"W 145.04 L16 S08*05'1 3"W 10,00, C14 132.77 330.00 N 8325'34"W 131.88 '09"W 145.04 C35 140.59 145.11 S89'07'27"W 135,16 C58 61,11 235.00 N52'1 2'27"E 60.94 34"W 131.88 C36 172.31 130.00 S17'3 '40"W 159.97 C62 261.86 976.16 S17.47'4 "W 261,08
L17 '33*W 50,00' C15 39.27 25.00 N '54' "W 35,36 00"W 35,36 C37 15,34 156.00 S10'54'16"W 15.34 C63 72.63 1004.14 S2 • 5'17' 72.61
L18 39-43-22-E 5,13' C16 36,00 206.00 St '05'36"W 35.95 L19 7 *42'05*W 20,80' C17 49,90 156.00 N17'15'01"E 49,69 36"W 35.95 C38 41,18 25.00 S60' 4'39"W 36.68 C64 11.89 370.00 • 4'4 "W 11,89 SCALE 1" = 60' 01"E 49,69 C39 541,48 976.16 S09'21'16"E 534.57 C65 110.04 1962,51 S 7' ' 1' 110,02
L20 C18 33.26 25.00 N64'31'49" 30.86 '49" 30.86 C40 93.09 1026.16 S04' 0'30"W 93,06 C66 93.43 1912,51 S '07" 93.42 60' 0 60' 120'
L22 C19 83.36 185.11 N87'09'33"W 63.05 L23 C20 70,00 185.11 S72'1 2'04"W 69.58 33"W 63.05 C41 94,18 1026.16 S00.43'11"E 94.15 C67 60.89 976,16 SO '1 ' 6"W 60.88 OF 23
04"W 69.58 C42 65.89 206,00 N17'1 '01" 65.61 C68 13.35 130.00 5 0"W 13.35
T

_ _
i
0i \ ~ Z
i Z ~
\ ~ U
° OPEN SPACE "B" \ w ~ w ~
~ Z ~n \ _ Z ~
~ ~ ~ LOT 10 Z 0
LOT 33 ' • , 1 w U cv ~
LOT 32 .LOT 21 1 ~ ~ ~ ~
1 ~ 1 W a
ti m 1 h~Q
~ ~ LOT 20 a 1 ~ ~ N "
a LOT 9 ~ 1 ~ -N~ 0 ~ ro E
LOT 22 1 ~ LT11 oU~o 0 1 1`~ w Z U
PE ANENT MINOR ERSION, 1 H .N ~
ICAL, SEE DETAIL. FAIL ~ ~ ~ ^ O ~ 368 v J ~ ~ Q•
~ LOT 19 ~
LOT 31 6 U 00 ~ ~ I ~ Z Umw
LOT 34 ~ ~ 1 I a _ Z o~U
M = Z od0 I I U Q
I LOT 8 Q
6b I
1
LOT 23 1
\ LOT 12 I
LOT 18 LOT 35 LOT 30 18 ` ~ OE1EN11ON ~
LOT 24 a 4 ~ . 31 ~ 9 ~ ~
~
w ~g1 ~ LOT 7
S5
1 ~ g ~ s+
~ Z 5 ~ F
9 i r8l~ ~ . 3
LOT 29 ~ ~ v f
LOT 36 s
LOT 17 SEE HEADWALLS AND LOT 17 raNawws NoiE. H , ~
a LOT 25
~ o ~ LOT 6
1 sEE DETAIL-ter: a 1
i1 ~ p1ANNEL a DES az ~ ~
~ \ PERMANENT MEDIUM
® LOT 37 ~ LOT 28 LOT 1 ~ \ \ f DIVERSION. 2 \ LOT 16 ~ ~ TYPICAL. SEE DETAIL, SEE !#AD Alp \
NMIOWAl1S NO ~
LOT 27 9 LOT 26
w 4 ~
3 1g w J N
ss \ ~ FUTURE
~ DEVELOPMENT
LOT 13 ~A
LOT 39 a s \ \
LOT 15 LOT 40 LOT 15 ~ 1
y
5 OE1EN11ON 3 3~ v, ~
\ V ~ M '
\ LOT 41
\ \ ' ~ ~ a s ~ f ~ LOT 14 s a, < , ,
H I
~ \ ~w \ LOT 42 4 a a
j LOT 43 ~ \
_ s \ 55 J` / I ~
'.:CY,_ ~ ~ I \ a
,1
ee~~~i ~ \ ~ \ s ~
_ G ~ s \ ~ ti, w
LOT 44 SS ~ \ I w w 5 1 w
~ \
STORM DRAINAGE STRUCTURES TABLE w N~ \ 1 LOT 2 ~
STRUCTURE TOP INV. IN INV, OUT REMARKS ~ W . w CI 1 397,30 390.30 N 1 1> J
CI 2 397,30 390.10 S 389.90 NE "sss 1 ~ I ~ ~ I n
LOT 45 CI 3 391,60 385.0 S 384.80 SE ~ 1 u I
CI 4 391,60 384.60 NW 379.00 SE ~r h
JB 5 388.00 373.50 N 373,30 SE STORM DRAINAGE PIPE TABLE ~ ~ 6 ~ ~ I 1
FES 6 371.00 CLASS "B" RIPRAP APRON - 12'Lx6'Wx8"TH FROM TO DIA. AT, LENGTH SLOPE ~ CI t CI 2 15" RCP 21' 1,OX ~ W w w ~ x ~
~s CI 2 CI 3 15 RCP 167 2.9X ~g CI 7 382, 00 374,40 W CI 3 ' LOT 3 1 ~ 3._ 1b Lek x I
CI 8 CI 4 15 RCP 21 1.OX s 382,00 374,20E 374.00 N " i/ 1
CI 9 377,00 369.60 SE 369.40 NW CI 4 JB 5 15 RCP 55 10,OX w ~ , JB 5 FES 6 15" RCP 83' 2.8X 1 ,
CI 10 375,00 367.70 S ~.y ~ y4~ CI 11 375,00 367.50 N 367,30 W CI ~ " ~ ~ a ~ ~ m ~x ~ ~
367.50 SE CI 8 15 RCP 21 1.OX !y ~ ~
CI 8 CI 9 15" RCP 96' 4,6X k FES 12 370.00 ~ h ~ ~ k ,yh 1 \
CI 9 CI 11 15" RCP 78' 2.4X ~ ~ CI 13 376,00 386.70 E 366.50 N CI 10 ' ~ ~
367,50 S CI 11 15 RCP 21 1,OX CI 11 CI 13 15" RCP 62' 1,OX ~ 1
YI 14 364,00 360.20E FES 1 ti YI 15 363,00 358,30 W 358.10E 2 CI 13 t8 RCP 25 10,OX h o
CI 13 YI 15 24" RCP 130' 6.3X 358, 30 S LOT i \ a
YI 16 367,00 358,80 356.60 ~ 14 11 15 15" RCP 33' 5.BX ~ ~ ~ ~ U
„ » „ YI 15 11 16 24" RCP 63' 2.1 X FES 17 356.00 CLASS B RIPRAP APRON - 12 Lx6 Wx14 TH " ~ DE1ENil01' YI 16 FES 17 24 RCP 62 1,OX w d~ 6 S ~ N ~ 4 ~ ~ W 6 \ Z o
RISER 18 360,00 355.90 " 9
FES 19 355.00 CLASS "A" RIPRAP APRON - 6'Lx5'Wx6"TH RISER 18 FES 19 15 RCP 89 1.OX ~A ~ ~ ~ 1 ~ 4A 1
CI 20 CI 21 15" RCP 21' 1.OX `A CI 20 360.90 354.0 SE CI 21 '
CI 21 360.90 353.80 NW 353.60E CI 22 15 RCP 31 1,3X e r / W \ ~
CI 22 358.20 353,40 353.20 SE CI 22 CI 24 15" RCP 162' 3.2X ~ FES 23 CI 24 30" RCP 35' 2.OX 339 ~
FES 23 347,00 CI 24 CI 24 352,90 346,10 NW 346.00 NE CI 25 30 RCP 29 1,OX YS.
CI 25 FES 26 30" RCP 60' 1.OX 346,30 S YI 27 FES 26 15" R P 4 ' 1 E` : ~ w \ a 9 ~ o
CI 25 352.90 344,70 SW 339,60 N C 5 .OX
„ „ „ PIPE 28 FES 30 15" RCP 38' t.OX FES 26 339.00 CLASS B RIPRAP APRON - 18 Lx8 Wx14 TH Y \ o:
~ 27 354.50 339,50 1 " , ~ w \ \ ~
FES 28 339.00 CLASS "A" RIPRAP APRON - 6'Lx5'Wx6"TH ~ 3 FES 32 15 RCP 35 1.OX PIPE 29 338.50 PIPE 33 FES 34 15" RCP 45' 1,OX \ z
FES 30 338.10 CLASS "A" RIPRAP APRON - 6'Lx5'Wx6"TH ~ DATE:
DOUBLE CI 35 CI 36 15" RCP 21' 1.OX ` ~ ~ 4!09!02
CI 36 FES 37 15" RCP 85' t.OX YI 31 356.50 351.30 N FES 38 ' ~ JOB No: 00208
FES 32 351.00 CLASS "A" RIPRAP APRON - 6'Lx5'Wx6"TH 11 39 15 RCP 76 10,2X \ DRAWING: \ 00 208 04
PIPE 33 4 YI 39 FES 40 15" RCP 49' 1.OX 350.0 PIPE 41 FES 42 1 " R P ~ ~ FES 34 349.90 CLASS "A" RIPRAP APRON - 6'Lx5'Wx6"TH 5 C 46 1,OX DESIGNED: SJB
DOUBLE CI 35 349,50 340.00 N YI 43 FES 44 15" RCP 24' 1,OX DRAwN: LMHlSJB
CI 36 349,50 339.80 S 337.90E PIPE 45 FES 46 15" RCP 67' 1,OX CHECKED:
FES 37 337.00 CLASS "A" RIPRAP APRON - 6'Lx5'Wx6"TH FES 47 ' FES 48 54 RCP 54 0,30X HORIZONTAL SCALE:
FES 38 347,00 1"=60'
YI 39 341,00 339.20 SE 337.50 VERTICAL SCALE:
FES 40 " " _ ~ ~ " HEADWALLS AND WINGWALLS NOTE: 337.00 CLASS A RIPRAP APRON 6 Lx5 Wx6 TH NA
PIPE 41 336.40 THESE PLANS SHOW THE PROPOSED CROSSING OF A NEUSE RIPARIAN STREAM AND BUFFER SHEET N0.
FES 42 338_nn ri arc "a" RIPRAP APRON - R'I Y5'WYR"TH FOR BLACKSTONE DRIVE. IN ORDER TO AVOID COSTLY MITIGATIONS, IT IS NECESSARY
TO LIMIT DISTURBANCE OF THE AFOREMENTIONED STREAM BUFFER TO WHAT IS SHOWN
THIS REQUIRES THAT TALLER HEADWALLS (12' INVERT-TOP), AND LONGER 30 DEGREE YI 43 340.00 337.30 NE WINGWALLS (20' MAX.) MUST BE CONSTRUCTED. THERE ARE NO KNOWN STANDARD DETAILS
FES 44 337.00 CLASS "A" RIPRAP APRON - 6'Lx5'Wx6"TH FOR THIS APPLICATION. IT WILL BE NECESSARY FOR THE DEVELOPER TO HIRE A
PIPE 45 336.60 STRUCTURAL ENGINEER TO DESIGN CONSTRUCTION DETAILS OF THESE HEADWALLS AND SCALE 1" = 60' 1 7
FES 46 336.00 CLASS "A" RIPRAP APRON - 6'Lx5'Wx6"TH WINGWALLS, CUSTOMIZED TO FIT THE SITUATION. THESE DETAILS MUST BE DESIGNED AND SUBMITTED TO CITY OF DURHAM ENGINEERING AND STORMWATER FOR APPROVAL
FES 47 336,10 CONCRETE CHANNEL -SEE DETAIL. PRIOR TO BEGINNING ANY CONSTRUCTION. A RAILING MUST BE INSTALLED AT THE TOP 60' 0 60' 120'
OF THE WALLS. SEE RAILING DETAIL. FES 48 335.90 CLASS "B" RIPRAP APRON - 27'Lx14'Wx12"TH
OF 23

_
i
N ~ ~ • •W I N3o'20'33"W \ N30'20'33"w CLUSTER SUBDIVISION DATA Z N3o'2o'33'w TOTAL AREA: 30.34 ACRES (1,321,649 SF) 0
N30'20'33"W $ N30'20 33 W 0 33 W N30'20 33 238,67 88'22' AREA IN NEW STREETS: 3.05 ACRES 0 1=
1 7.15' Li 148,02' 131,60' 271,38' • G ~ ~',17b•0~4~,',',';~,• 5 ~ N30'20'33W \ AREA IN OPEN SPACE: 2.66 ACRES ? U
~ 103,40' " , r ~ ~ r ~ ~ " - 'OPEN,SPACE A,' o 1 ~ ~ ~ w - - - - r , , • O•. 1~\ ~ ~ 1,0 ~ ~ ~ ~ AREA IN FUTURE DEVELOPMENT: 2.78 ACRES w ~
~ I I OPEN SPACE B „ ~ l- '•'67 817 SF'~'~'~'•'~'~~' , I I ~ 11411 SF ~ I 'N22.' ' • I I \ AREA IN LOTS: 21.85 ACRES Z N
3 I ~ I I$ N < ~ m I ~ (TOT LOT) f I f , , , , '~'9 O 3 \ Ae TOTAL NUMBER OF LOTS: 43 - Z ~ ,9 ~ I t; . I s~ p
~ I I _ 1 I N ~ I ~ - „ ' ~ i ~ \ LOT 10 " N I \ p AVERAGE LOT SIZE: 22,134 SF Z 0 ~ ~ tii, I ~ \ ti ~ S~ ZONING: R-20 w U ~
N LOT 33 W ~ I I I , , , , '''z o ~ I LOT 32 LOT 21 \i , , , , I I N30'20'33 W , , , ~ ~ 20,030 SF $ „ 1 I .W I , , , , ~ c "Z ~ ~s• 20,295 SF I ~ I WATERSHED DISTRICT: E-B WATERSHED
1 I ~ 8 v I 20,005 SF I 7,98 s 22,288 SF r $ I ~ ~9, F I I INSIDE CITY LIMITS, INSIDE UGA o
I m l \ ~ l a ~ z ~ \ LOT 9 \ i0' PROPOSED USE: RESIDENTIAL ~ ( \ F MINIMUM EXTERIOR LOT SIZE: 20,000 SF ~ - x
N m \ s ~ 1 2 1 „ w I I . I I LOT 20 / o.. ~ ~ L 20,178 SF \ , N ~ Q w~ i ~ MINIMUM EXTERIOR LOT WIDTH: 100 ? ,
N o w L------~ ~ I \ 117,281 SF / „ ' ~ " \ \ ~ W N \ EXTERIOR LOT MINIMUM SETBACKS: 35 FRONT; > ~
182.33 ~ ~ ~ „ » I LOT 22 0 ~ ~ I / ~ROPOSED 30 ,9 \ ~ N M 30 TOTAL SIDE;12 SIDE ~ oo ~
~ ~ N30 O'33W ~ / /CITY OF DURHAM ~ ~ ~ _ _ 148. z _ _ I 17,448 SF ~ I ~,9 , , , , LOT 11 \ \ ~ ~ °o a \ , 17.5 STREET SIDE; 25 REAR w z ~ 15,388 SF ~ _ - ~ • N c
w ~ r - - - - ~ / / / SANITARY SEWER ,Z , I I t0• I y ~ EASEMENT , , , , - - _ L~.~ Q = ~ 3
' I I I I ~ + o0 5 ~ (SEE NOTE A T , , , , , \ e 2'2g"w MINIMUM INTERIOR LOT SIZE: 10,000 SF , ^ w o! ~ ^ a , , I N37'S I I v' ~ 0 ~ ~
~ ~ LOT 34 ~ $ I I o ~ r ` / ~ 1 ~ , ~ 137 42 M NIMUM NTERIOR LOT WIDTH: 50 _ - INTERIOR LOT MINIMUM SETBACKS: 17.5 FRONT• ~ ~ o' ~ o
a o" ~ LOT 31 I ~ m ~ ~ I 3e"w . + + LOT 19 I 20,014 SF I o W I o W l Q os,t7' l ~a N N ~ ~ \ , , ~ r ~ 15 TOTAL SIDE; 7,5 SIDE w Z (J m w ~
~ 15,332 SF I m ~ J 17,503 SF / / 1 1 I o gN I gN I ~ ~ \ / , , 8 ^ 17 ~ TR T I 1 R AR ~ Z U ti ,5 S EE S DE; 2.5 E o 2g~1 o I ~ 2 0 ~ 0 Z o -
~-----------J ~ ~I ~I ~ c / / „ „ , , ~ 1.55 ~ g / LOT 8 ~ ~ U Q ~ _ > 4 \ ~ ~ , STREET CONSTRUCTION DATA ~ ~
30'2033"W ( ~ \ ~ ? / ~ ~ LENGTH OF NEW STREETS: 2635 LF TOTAL Q ~ \ ~ 20,055 SF ~
^ ~ 1` / 204,41' ~ ~ ~ LOT 23 ~ / ~ ~ _ _ _ _ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ LOT 18 ~ , _ ~ I STREET CONSTRUCTION IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CITY OF /
~ N30'20'33W 18580 SF ~ ~ ~ DURHAM STANDARDS. LOT 12 ~
a ~ 148.02 \ \ 17,303 SF I ( N I I ~ LOT 24 , , , , y \ 1 1 15,353 SF " •A•
1 I ~ 8~ w ~a I Z 18 834 SF ~ „ PROPOSED 30 CITY ~I ~ \ o \ S30'20 33 E PROPOSED 30 FOOT wDE qTY OF DURHAM SANITARY SEw7t EASEMENT,
LOT 35 I $ m N I A ITARY f0 1 , , ~ I ~ m ~ OF DURHAM S N ~ dl \ N \ 229,70' SUBJECT TO tERMS STATED N TIE DECLARAnON IN REAL ESTATE BOOK - - - - 1610, PAGE 938. NO STRUCTURES, FAl, EMBANKMENTS, TREES OR
I 21,517 SF I A ~ I LOT 30 F SEWER EASEMEN ~ # cu ~ 4 '0• SEE NOTE "A" • N) I - et-49-40 1 PT ¦ 2t+88,49 16 028 SF ( R . + 3'E , „ / - - - - G OBS1RUCnONS PERMITTED wTHN THE EASEMENT EXCEPT ACCORDING TO , , , , ~ 8 ~ THOSE TERMS, PROPOSED ~ L20
I I ~ I m~ 50,00' 1 S40b12 \ , , L - 214,22' ' , qTY STORM ~ NDTE 'e'
a L-------------~ I Oc•3e-++-SO ~ 151,60 I ~ \ I DRAINAGE EASEME LOT 7 I STREAM BUFFER: 6o FOOT wDE UNDISTURBED STREAM BUFFER EACH SIDE \ " " N ~ Z OF STREAM, MEASURED FROM TOP OF BANK. NO CLEARNG OR GRADING
S30'20'33"E ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ $ ~ , , , 228.89 a ~ ? ~ E 7 EE NOTE ~ ~ 28 249 SF + on~R THAN THNNINO AND ORDNARY MNNTENANCE aF E>asnNG M ~ m VEGETAnON PERMITTED.
~ I ~ 4' PT¦1 19.40 , / ,38.0 ~ „ , JN1 N PROPOSED 16 CITY c
~ / a \ I , ~ LOT 29 ~ / I , , ~ z ~ STORM DRAINAGE EASEMENT ' „ N~ PROPOSED 16 FOOT YADE PUBLIC STORM WATER ORNNAOE EASEMENT. , , '36' ~ - - - J SEE NOTE "C" rn OWNER9AP OF, AND RESPONSIBILITY FOR IMPROVEIAENT AND MNNTENANCE Of E - - (
I 4,00 ~ / PROPOSED 16' _ ~ Z \ , , ~ ~ 15,420 SF / v ~ ~ ~ I LOT 17 ~ , OF STORM WATER FACIUnES N iHIS EASEMENT REMAINS wTH THE ' , ' ~ ¦ T + S30'20'33"E GRANTOR, IF THE PROPERTY IS wTHN oR BECOMES A PART OF THE aTY,
I $ CITY STORM I ~ ~ ~ ~ 3 LOT 38 1 / 1 DRAINAGE EASEMENT N "i a I 22,002 SF , , ','PROPOSED 32 THE EASEMENT AND ACCESS PONTS TO THE EASEMENT ARE SUBJECT TO '.'CITI~ ST DRAINAG~E~~ p 280.88' THE TERMS AID RESiRICTIONS STATED N THE 'REVISED DECLARAnON GF
I I ~ x 25 371 SF ~ \ PROPOSED 16 CITY ~ 1 (SEE NOTE C • ~ ~ I \ , , ~ , ~ , g o PoGHTS AID PRIMUEOES OF THE aTY OF DURHAM N STORM WA •'EASEMENT, : ~ MANAGEMENT FACILITY EASEMENTS' RECORDED N REAL ESTATE BOOK
N ~ I ' I m a ~ STORM DRAINAGE LOT 28 1 LOT 25 ~ I , E NOTE D 1 ~ ~ \ PAGE 206, wMCH DOCUMENT IS INCORPORATED HEREIN, THIS EASEMENT LOT 8 I z AND REVISED DEaARAnaN Do Nor CREATE THE o6uGAna+ id PROwOE
~ I EASEMENT / I x ^ ~ \ • • / 17,487 SF 1 17,931 SF L - _ _ _ _ _ , I , ~ (SEE NOTE D ,m 1 , 7, " \ m Pueuc MANTENANCE No BUILDINGS, STRUCTURES, Flus, EMBANKMENTS oR , , 30,335 SF I ~ aesTRUCnaNS PERMITTED wTHN THE EASEMENT EXCEPT ACCORDING To
x25501 ~ ~ \ / / ~ ~ N n y PC 13+97.94 - - - ~ $ ~ THOSE TERMS
~ / LOT 28 ~i' - a ~ '0 r \ \ / ' - . N M ~ I PROPOSED ~ ,i i \ I 0 . PROPOSED 30' CITY I • N~ 'D' rn PROPOSED 32 FORT wDE PUBLIC STORM WATER DRNNAGE EASEMENT.
• , , ~ \ / 15,38 SF - _ , a I CITY STORM \ \ 1V1839 \ STORM DRAINAGE EASEMENT OMNERSHIP aF, AND RESPONSIBILITY FOR NAPROVELIENT AND MAINTENANCE , , 01 \ SEE NOTE "D" I OF STORM WATER FAaunES N THIS EASEMENT REMAINS wTH TI6E
• ~ ~ ~ / ~ - . # f DRAINAGE EASEMENT az 55 / V R I I / LOT 18 LOT 37 / ~ a ~ 1 R ,1 ~ ~ . 7_ Z CURVE 5 ~ BEGIN +NOEIBNG I GRANTOR, IF THE PROPETtTY N wTHN OR BECOMES A PART aF THE aTY, z~', . \ - THE EASEMENT ANO Access FONTS To THE EASEMENT ARE sueJECr To
a2 / ~ ~ -ea-o 03 I I LOT 27 I I - ae-+a2o +~+~79 / / s ~ R 280.00' I 1 1 23,024 SF 23,813 SF / / \ \ ~ - I 18,482 SF R - +es.++' aFFSEr: +200 R/ / " " • ~ • ~ • \ _ ' ~ ' THE TERMS AND RESTT6C110NS STATED IN 1HE 'REVISED DECLARAnON OF \ ~ ~ RIGH7S AND PRINLEOES OF THE qTY OF DURHAM N STORM WATER
/ / ~ pc • - I I I l - 28290' 1 1 , ° ~Yt• ~ 8 _ 0 ~0 \ + MANAGEMENT FACXlTY EASEMENTS" RECORDED N REAL ESTATE BOOK 2296,
/ / \ ` ~ ~ I Oc - 34-42-07 / ` h h I ~ / / ~ I I ~ 1 1 / ~ ~ ° ~ ' iP. 111 ~ PAGE 206, w#CN DOCUMENT IS INCORPORATED HEREN, 1HIS EASEYENT 0~ ~?s ~"w \ AND REVISED DECLARA110N DO NOT CREATE THE OBUOAiION 1T) PRONDE • •99 ~,~'v a ~F~ os , , . , 20o Pubuc MANTENANCE No ewusNCS, STRUCTURES, FILLS, EMBANKMENTS oR
~ ~ I ~ ~ 1 / / LOT 39 ~ I I I ~ 1 1 / ~ ~ A ~ . , oesTaucnals PERMITTED wTHN nIE EASEMENT EXCEPT AccaROlNC to LOT 13 soFq G~ 1 FUTURE DEVELOPMENT THOSE TERMS
~ / 23 321 SF / ~ ~ ~ J ~ END NIDENING7 ~ ~ ~ L , STA. 558,5 V ~ / ~ I I < ,,F? / $ / / / \ CS ~ ~ . ~ I ~ OFFSET: 13.00 R ~ \ ~ r ~ 1 1 17,927 SF A~`' , . , , \
s / `ten ~ ~s ~ c ~F 120,952 SF ~~tir \ \ PROPOSED 17 F00T MADE PUBLIC STORM WATER DRAINAGE EASEMENT. u
I / ~ / \ S?073" / ~ ~ ~ / / / ~ \ 90 e E LOT 15 ~ ~ CURVE 1 \ OWNERSHIP OF, AND RESPONSIB6JIY FOR NAPROVEMENT AND MAINTENANCE i~ I ¦ 48-28-3J \ , . OF STORM WATER fAgU11ES N iIMS EASEMENT REMANS w1H THE
1 / / / / LOT 40 \ ~ / ~ ~ / / / ~ 20,520 SF R ¦ 350.00' I \ GRANTOR, ~ THE PROPERTY IS wTHN OR BECOMES A PART OF THE qTY, l ¦ 293.92' ~ O< \ . , \ THE EA9EIRHT AND ACCESS FONTS ib THE EASEMENT ARE SUBJECT TO
I / PROPOSED 30' CITY OF ' / 18,522 SF g1RYE 3 ~ \ 3 I / / DURHAM SANITARY ~ / ~ 3B•E ~ ~ I - 18-+9-37 ~ / \ ti \ Dc ¦ 16-22-1 \ 1HE TERMS AND RESTI6C110NS STATED N THE 'REVISED DECLARAiIpV OF RNiHTS AND PAINUEOES OF THE aTY OF DURHAM N STORM WATER
e ~ / / ~ \ 124 09, 00 1b~ y R - +81,00' / / \ ! . ^ ~ / SEWER EASEMENT / A ~ \ a / ,~b%` \ MANAGEMENT FACILITY EASEMENTS' RECORDED N REAL ESTATE BOOK 2290. + \ , , , , PAGE 206, w1cH DOCUMENT IS INCORPORATED HEREN, THS EA9EMEIIT
N ~ I " " / PROPOSED 16 CITY ~ ~ ~ ~ . ti ~ - 57.90' / / \ ,r (SEE NOTE A /STORM DRAINAGE ~ \ xti~ Dc - 31-39-18 / ~ C~ 'a~ / PROPOSED \ , , \ AND REVISED DEa.ARAnoN Do NDT aIEATE THE oeuoAnow TD PROVIDE ~ / CITY STORM , , . , ~ Pubuc MANTENANCE No BLILDNGS, STRUCTURES, FlLLS, EMBANKMENTS oR
H LOT 38 EASEMENT r h \ ~ ~ \ . , GesTRUCnGNS PERMITTED wTHN THE EASEMENT ExcEPT ACCORDING To \ \ DRAINAGE EASEMENT \ I TNO~ TEwa,
(SEE NOTE D I 22,205 SF •M 0 - - , \ / \
~ ~ LOT 41 ~A - ~ \ I ~ ~ ~ v LE r - - , \ \ I ~ NDTE 'F' \ , , m Au LOTS TD eE lTIMC1D eY PuBUC 1flAET! NO w?TER.
~ 13,185 SF PROPOSED ' / I 1 f \ ~ ~tC , s / / ~ 5 SIDEWALK ? C' LOT 14 / ti / to . i ~ ~ NDTE 'G"
I ces / \ ~ / / / . ~ / / \ 20 248 SF / . ' , . ..r ~ N STREET AND DRPA:NNY 1PADT 10 II6?N6N1 611FfER !TALL RE9U1K ~ ~ • ~ ~ APPROVAL FROM N, G aVISKN aF WA7ER auAUTY,
~ _ LOT 42 / , , /
g ~ / LOT 43 / \ ~~s.a~ / ~ c ~ 14,387 SF / \ ~M Q \ FAMAL PLAT NO OEEO OEgCAiNO RX11T OF WAY TO ~ REGORGED PRK>A lO E srP 13 ~ ~ THE a1luNat a eu1G1IO PERAAR.
3'~, ~ ~ 15,757 SF / Qv» \ / LOT 44 \ e ,gyp ~ `~~5° a . ~ , NDTE r
~e• 9 *o• P I NCOOT DI11Atw~Y PERMR Rt01AAED Pwa ro wFSTIaaIcnGN,
/ 18 298 SF \ / ~ \ \ , . \PROPOSED NOTE V
" " PROPOSED 30' ~ ~ ~e'~ / OPEN SPACE C / / , ~ , G ~ CITY OF DURHAM ~ ~ ~ ~ , , TTY STORM Lot i dull NAVE NO D1ECt ACCTSS TD OIASS AD. / LOT 2 \ \ , C ~ gRAINAGE EASEMENT NOTE .K.
G G 38,741 SF / SANIT \ ~ G ARY SEWER \ ~ 15 21,588 SF ~ a \ . , THE IOCATNM v THE SoEM111JDT SNOwI aN iN6 PLAN RT SaIEMATK: A \ / / a~.~ \ I aTY aF ouRNAMroR NCDOT oiaioAa~IENT PERMIT w RE0111A:D PRIOR to
EASEMENT ~v \ ~i• \ / / o ANY caaTRUDTIDN, AFRJi OBTAif10 THE RE9IMIED PERYTS, PLEASE `~11u u u n~,~~ / / \ , , , 1 ' CONTACT nt qtY aF arrluM ENOIE9rq caaTRIICTIDn NsPECnoN
G ~ SEE NOTE "A', \ , a, ~ \ / OFfiCE AT BIO-1311 Fpt A PILE-OONSABICWON NO A FIELD ~ "'~?Q/ ~i / I I VgITPRKXt ~ C ~i
CURVE 2 G - ~ I +0-00-47 ~ , \ / PROPOSED 1 , , G >ti AIn wXac aN TME PROPasED TADEr?xx. • , ~ / / CITY STORM ~ - I~ NDTE t• •'9
R • 181,00' ~,~pk `b• END TAPER 'I' \ / AINA ~ . , ';o LoT 1 AS PO! P 7 7 / OR GE ~ ~Z DEED Boat 13s, AGE a 3-6 s sHAU ~ suaECT To A FAPER '1'j \ ~ .',~jp Cf PERPETUAL OONTNUNG SCENC EASEMENT. THE PROPERTY wLL NOT BE USED SEAL
Dc 338339-+8 / ~ STA: 13+3211 ~~f , ~ ~ d• / ~ EASEMENT 1 . , ' ~ 1 13+3211 y / " . , AT ANY T1K FOR ANYTHING OTHER 7HAN ONE SINGLE-FAMA.Y RESIDENnAL = t2ao R ?t ~ / LOT 3 SEE NOTE C ~ ~y ~ DwuE,G wTH suPPa6nNO ouTBwLaNOS (sua+ As A oARAGE oR PuMP = E- 15456 ; G;,
. C / Q~ , OFFSET 1200 R ~?t •c9p, ~ ~ 1 . , , . : NouSE, ETC.), No MoeAE HOME CAN BE LocATED aN Lor 1. ~
LOT 45 / ' / / PROPOSED 17' CITY / ,~s'~ ~~ry / STORM DRAINAGE ~ 15,011 SF / ~ \ 81,888 SF 6 ~ , . • • • • ~
EASEMENT a / / \
. ~ NOTE "E" . ~ / /BEGIN TAPER \ ) ~ / STA: 12+88.37 \ a37 \ \ ~L~L~ I ~
` y1 y~/ ~ / OFFSET: 17,00 R \ PROPOSED ~ ~ti?~ .00 \ \ ~ 91 '0' 1 \ `Sep ~ , 5
5' SIDEWALK / \ \ ~ . OPEN SPACE cALCUUTION
G i PROPO D ' N A \ ~ 1 .y PROPOSED OPE SP CE \ / \ LOT m
I I SIDEWAL \ ~ • ~0 O R \ t` 1 , \ 11 1 4 1
\ a Z " \ 12 1 4 47
~A ~ ~'o G ~ a 'D•\ : ' \ 13 17 7 7 ~ /
A ~ LOT 1 0~ ~ LOT 1 ~ 18 17 7 \ •a ~ \
~ S'S ~ ~ 108,788 d 108 788 SF ~ 19 17 4 7 \ 20 17 71 \ s' 22 17 Z
11 ~ ~d o \ o~ ~ o \ F \ 23 1 4 ~
T \ \ \ ~ \ 24 1 1 0.
~O ~ X10 x 70 PROPOSED \ \ 25 17 1 U \ \ 28 17 7 1 N w
SIGHT CITY STORM ' . df ~ TRIANGLE DRAINAGE EASEMENT \ 27 1 1 Z o \ \
~ ~ ~ (TYP,) \ \ 28 1 4 Q
J „ \ ~ 1 29 1 4 4 (n ^ \ ~ \ 30 1 74
/ \ \ ~ 31 1 4 LU \ \ 40 1 47
/ \ \ \ 41 \ 1 1 1
/ vo. ~ / 42 14 7 1
/ / / , \~~i \ 43 t 77 4 w . \ ~~i ~ 44 a
~ s $ \N 1 7 0 s ~ / '3` 45 ,
~ Fq Fq \ ~ _--J Tor • 7 ~
~ s~ ~ \ q~ _ _ _ _ _ _ AL OPEN SPACE REQUIRED. 9,407 SF (1,82 AC.) w 9~ \ PROPOSED OPEN SPACE: 115,969 SF (2.68 AC.) m
F ~ ~ \
~G \ Z , \ PEED IMPERVOUS SURFACE CALCULATIONS: DATE: 4109102
295.7r \ IMPERVIOUS SURFACE MAY NOT EXCEED 24% OF LOT AREA. ,LOB N0:
\ CURVE TABLE AREA. 1'200'697 SF 00208 MAX, IMPERVIWS SURFACE ALLOWED: 288,187 SF DRAWING: CURVE TABLE CURVE LENGTH RADIUS CHORD DIRECTION CHORD ROADS: 75,794 SF 00-208-04
UNE TABLE SIDEWALKS: 10,190 SF
LINE BEARING LENGTH CURVE TABLE CURVE LENGTH RADIUS CHORD DIRECTION CHORD C43 33.41 25.00 i' 30.97 PUMP STAiION: 7,717 SF DESIGNED: JWP C21 21,38 170.00 7' ' 1 21.37 C44 82.96 1028.18 82.94 TOTAL MAX. IMPERVIOUS SURFACE ALLOWED FOR LOTS: 194,488 SF
L1 CURVE LENGTH RADIUS CHORD DIRECTION CHO I DIRECTION CHORD C22 61.78 170.00 80.98 C45 98.50 190.11 97.40 AVERAGE MAX. IMPERVIOUS SURFACE ALLOWED PER LOT: 4,522 SF DRAWN: LMH
L2 C1 261,88 978.18 7'47' "W 281. L3 C2 8.35 370,00 7 'W 8. 747' 'W 281.08 C23 80.00 170.00 59.69 C46 114.50 1028.18 Pt 114.44 MAX. IMPERVIOUS SURFACE ALLOWED PER LOT: 4,500 SF
L4 C3 68,09 370,00 7 'I ' "W 88. ' 'W 8.35 C24 83.47 170.00 7 '4 63.10 C47 131.33 1028.18 131,24 MAX, IMPERVIOUS SURFACE FOR LOT 3: 11,217 SF CHECKED: ' "W 88.00 C25 18,18 170,00 7'44' 18.11 C46 97.70 285.00 97.22
L5 ' LB ~ C4 182.88 370,00 7' 181. 7' 181.57 C28 23.18 25,00 '1 22.36 C49 81.30 1028.16 61,29 HORIZONTAL SCALE:
L7 • C5 63,81 370,00 83. ~ CB 23.18 25,00 7 ' i" 22. ' 83.53 C27 71.94 50.00 65,N C50 81.00 1054,14 7' 80,99 1" = 60' 7 ' 1" 22.36 C28 65.71 50.00 7 81.08 CS1 97,17 285.00 SYMBOL LEGEND VERTICAL SCALE:
r 50.50 C29 59.88 50.00 '1 ' 56.37 C52 13.75 1054.14 7 ' 13.75 NA
L9 ~ C7 52.94 50,00 7' 50. L10 • ~ C8 83.00 50,00 1 '44' S8 6'01'44' 58.91 C30 37,28 50.00 7 ' 1' 36.42 C53 50.00 265,00 44' 41.94
C9 51.00 50,00 S49'IT1B"E 48. l9'I7'1B"E 48.82 C31 23.18 25.00 _ S47'O1'30~ 22,36 CS4 53,38 265.00 T 53.30 ~ EXISi1NG CONCRETE MONUMENT SHEET N0.
C10 48.08 50.00 N7 46. L12 ' 46.25 C32 134.38 235.00 '44" 132.53 C55 148.64 191151 ' 1 148.80 QQ EXISTING IRON PIN
34. L13 C11 34.79 50,00 N26'2 WE r " 34.09 C33 133.13 235.00 'I ' ' 131.36 C56 74.73 285.00 4 74.52
L14 • C12 23.18 25.00 "W 22. "W 22.36 C34 105.46 140.11 4 102.99 C57 25.54 285.00 25.54 Q IRON PIN SET 2-21,09ow 145.04 C35 140.59 145.11 r r 135.16 C58 61.11 235.00 80.94
L15 C13 146.24 330.00 7 1' "W 145. C14 132.77 330.00 N 63-25'34"W 131. L18 S08*05'1 3"W . 10,00' 4"W 131.88 C36 172.31 130.00 159.97 C62 261.86 976.18 Slr47*45*W 261.08
L17 C15 39.27 25.00 N "W 35. ' "W 35.36 C37 15.34 156.00 '1 "W 15.34 C63 72.63 1004.14 1172.81 "W 35.95 C38 41.18 25.00 "W 36.68 C64 11.89 370.00 '4 ' 11.89 SCALE 1" = 60'
L18 C16 36.00 206.00 "W 35. Sl 3'05 L19 C17 49.90 156.00 N17'15'01 *49. 17'1 ' 1" 49.69 C39 541.46 976.18 '1 534.57 C65 110.04 1962.51 ' 1 110.02
L20 C18 33.26 25.00 N 4' 1'4 " 30. 4' 1'4 " 30.86 C40 93.09 1026.16 'W 93.08 C66 93.43 1912.51 93.42 60' 0 60' 120'
L22 N20*27'36"W 8.17' C19 63.36 185.11 N 63. L23 S59*5 )0' C20 70.00 185.11 7 '1 ' 4"W 69. " 63.05 C41 94.18 1026.16 4 '11 94.15 C67 60.89 976.16 "W 80.88 OF 23 '1 ' 4"W 69.58 C42 65.89 208.00 N17'I ' 1' 85 61 C68 13.35 130.00 'W ' 13.35
'1'

~ Z
0 ~ ~ 5 0
I - ~ H- zU
\ ~ ~
~ ° OPEN SPACE B \ w o! 1 z ~
~ 1 ~ Z
\ LOT 10 Z U '0 ~ w U N
LOT 33 ` _ ~
LOT 32 LOT 21 o ~ 1
w
ti ~ 1 x ~ NaoQ
b 1 W N LL LOT 9 >
LOT 20 8 ` 1~.L - N cr) ~ LOT 11 ~ C0 ~
LOT 22 1 ~ ~ out o
P MANENT M4NOR D ERSION, NOR ~ ~ ~?cv U ~ W Q=~ c
PICAL. SEE DETAIL, DETAIL. 1 w ~ ~ 3 36 ~/I ~ ~~a
~ LOT 19 a 1 8 ~ o_Q~ I ~ 1 I U~ Ora O
LOT 31 w Z tJmw ~ 1 I ~ -
LOT 34 1 I 4 = Z o~-
Z o=0 I I U Q
~ J I LOT 8 Q ~
A I
l
9 I 1
LOT 23 ~ LOT 12 I
LOT 18 OT 18 ~ 1 OE1EN110N 1
LOT 35 LOT 30 LOT 24 4 ` 1 31 g ~ , . J' a
\
5~ H ~ ~
1'~ LOT 7 g5 r
19 s,
5 \ P
e~ / ' ` 3 1
LOT 29 ,3 1
N 1 d
LOT 36 s LOT 1 LOT 17 sEE Nuowuis ~+o ~ NINGWALLS NOTE
, 9 LOT 25 , 1
„ ,o ~ LOT 6 1
SEE DETNL-CONCRETE 4 1
gIANtEL 0 FES 47. i ~S ~ \ 8 u` \ ~
PERMANENT MEDIUM
LOT 37 LOT 28 LO ~ \ ~ f DIVERSION, LOT 16 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ww Wq ~ ~ TYPICAL. SEE DETAIL.
~ wrawNts No ~
LOT 27 9 LOT 26 DE1EN110N
w 4 a ~ ~I ~ ~6
J N 1
3 ~8 ss FUTURE
\ DEVELOPMENT
LOT 13 ~ \
8 LOT 39 a \ \
LOT 15 LOT 15 \ ~ ~
LOT 40 ~ ~
5 DE1EN110N 3
V > ~ ~
~ LOT 41 , tTA~ ~7_,~. ~
~ ~ 9 LOT 14 ss 4, ~ HI
,t
SS , . ~w a ~
LOT 42 3 ~ LOT 4 ~ 2
s \ ~ ~ c,5 S ~ S ~
A A ~ ~ ,'.1
SS
1~
~ ~ s \ ~ 1 w
G \ LOT 44 Gj \ J Y 5 ~ \ 1 w cA
'~S a ~ ~ 1
w~~ STORM DRAINAGE STRUCTURES TABLE ws LOT 2 w ~ 1 1
STRUCTURE TOP INV. IN INV. OUT REMARKS ~ y~ w ~ 1 1 11 ~
CI 1 397.30 390.30 N 1 1 1
CI 2 397.30 390.10 S 389.90 NE "ass ~1' LOT 45 CI 3 391.80 385.0 S 384.80 SE G 1 1 1
CI 4 391.80 384.60 N 379.00 SE h 1 1
STORM DRAINAGE PIPE TABLE JB 5 388.00 373.50 N 373.30 SE ~ ~ d 1 1 1 y
FES 6 371.00 CLASS "B" RIPRAP APRON - 12'Lx6'Wx8"TH FROM TO DIA. MAT. LENGTH SLOPE W ~ CI 1 CI 2 15 RCP 21 1.OX ~ W //yq~ e w ~ + 1 3 LOT 3 ~ 1
" 1 V S C CI 2 CI 3 15 RCP 167 2.9X ~ ~ ~k ri 1 1~~ ~ 1
CI 7 382.00 374.40 CI 3 CI 4 15" RCP 21' 1.OX ~ CI 8 382.00 374.20 E 374.00 NW CI 4 JB 5 15" RCP 55' 10.OX W
CI 9 377.00 369.60 SE 369.40 N JB 5 FES 6 15" RCP 83' 2.8X 1 , ~ > m
CI 1 D 375.00 367.70 S fir", ~ ~ 1 1 ~ ~
CI 11 375.00 367.50 N 367.30 W " ~ ~ a CI 7 CI 8 15 RCP 21 1.OX w
367.50 SE CI 8 CI 9 15" RCP 96' 4.6X ~ gk 1 ~ k
FES 12 370.00 CI 9 11 1 " R P 78' 2.4X ~ ~ CI 13 376.00 368.70E 366.50 N CI 5 C 1 ~ 1
CI 10 CI 11 15" RCP 21' 1.OX 367.50 S CI 11 y . \ 1
YI 14 364.00 360.20E CI 13 15" RCP 62 1.oX ti FES 12 CI 13 18 RCP 25 10.OX h ~I z ~ o
YI 15 363A0 358.30 W 358.10E CI 13 YI 15 24" RCP 130' 6.3X LOT 1 ~ ~ \ a
358.30 S YI 14 11 t 5 15" RCP 33' 5.8X YI16 367.00 356.80 356.60 , \ U
" . " YI 15 11 16 24 RCP 63 2.1 X ~ DE1EI FES 17 356.00 CLASS B RIPRAP APRON - 12 Lx6 Wx14 TH yl 16 " 1 \ v' ! \ DEtEN110N 4 ~ Z o
FES 17 24" RCP 62~ .OX w ~9 RISER 18 360.00 355.90 \ ~
RISER 18 FES 19 15 RCP 89 1.OX ~ FES 19 355.00 CLASS "A" RIPRAP APRON - 6'Lx5'Wx6"TH ' ~g ~ v 1 (A gF 1
CI 20 CI 21 15" RCP 21' 1.OX lr n
CI 20 360.90 354.0 SE CI 21 CI 22 15" RCP 31' 1.3X CI 21 360.90 353.80 N 353.60E CI 22 , W~y LL
CI 24 15 RCP 162 3.2X Q(, CI 22 358.20 353.40 353.20 SE , (339' \
FES 23 CI 24 30 RCP 35 2.OX FES 23 347.00 CI 24 ~ \ w \ ~
CI 24 352.90 346.10 N 346.00 NE CI 25 30 RCP 29 1.OX CI 25 FES 26 30" RCP 60' 1.OX \ o 9 \
346.30 SW YI 27 FES 28 15" RCP 45' 1.OX
CI 25 352.90 344.70 S 339.60 N PIPE 28 FES 30 15" RCP 38' 1.OX FES 26 339.00 CLASS "B" RIPRAP APRON - 18'Lx8'Wx14"TH \ ~ w
1127 354.50 339.50 , ~ m ~ _ ~ ~ ~
" " YI 31 FES 32 15 RCP 35 1.OX FES 28 339.00 CLASS A RIPRAP APRON - 6 Lx5 Wx6 TH PIPE 33 FES 34 15" RCP 45' 1.oX z
PIPE 29 338.50 DATE: 4109102 \
FES 30 338.10 CLASS "A" RIPRAP APRON - 6'Lx5'Wx6"TH " , DOUBLE CI 35 CI 36 15 RCP 21 1.oX roe No: 00208
CI 36 FES 37 15" RCP 85' 1.OX YI 31 356.50 351.30 N FES 38 YI 39 15" RCP 76' 10.2X '
FES 32 351.00 CLASS "A" RIPRAP APRON - 6'Lx5'Wx6"TH ~ , DRAWING: ~ \ 00-208-04
39 FES 40 15 RCP 49 1.oX i \ PIPE 33 350.40 PIPE 41 FES 42 15" RCP 46' 1.oX DESIGNED: SJg
FES 34 349.90 CLASS "A" RIPRAP APRON - 6'Lx5'Wx6"TH DRAwN: LMHISJB
YI 43 FES 44 15" RCP 24' 1.oX DOUBLE CI 35 349.50 340.00 N PIPE 45 FES 46 15" RCP 67' 1.oX
CI 36 349.50 339.80 S 337.90 E CHECKED:
FES 37 337.00 CLASS "A" RIPRAP APRON - 6'Lx5'Wx6"TH FES 47 FES 48 54" RCP 54' 0.30X HORIZONTAL SCALE:
1"=60'
FES 38 347.00 VERTICAL SCALE: NA
YI 39 341.00 339.20 SE 337.50 w HEADWALLS AND WINGWALLS NOTE: FES 40 337.00 CLASS "A" RIPRAP APRON - 6'Lx5'Wx6"TH
PIPE 41 336.40 THESE PLANS SHOW THE PROPOSED CROSSING OF A NEUSE RIPARIAN STREAM AND BUFFER SHEET N0.
FOR RLACKSTONE DRIVE. IN ORDER TO AVOID COSTLY MITIGATIONS. IT IS NECESSARY
rt5 4z 336 00 GLA55 A KIF'KAF' ArKUrv - Ci Lx0YYxC1 IM TO LIMIT DISTURBANCE OF THE AFOREMENTIONED STREAM BUFFER TO WHAT IS SHOWN.
THIS REQUIRES THAT TALLER HEADWALLS (12' INVERT-TOP), AND LONGER 30 DEGREE
YI 43 340.00 337.30 NE WINGWALLS (20' MAX.) MUST BE CONSTRUCTED. THERE ARE NO KNOWN STANDARD DETAILS FES 44 337.00 CLASS "A" RIPRAP APRON - 6'Lx5'Wx6"TH FOR THIS APPLICATION. IT WILL BE NECESSARY FOR THE DEVELOPER TO HIRE A
PIPE 45 336.60 STRUCTURAL ENGINEER TO DESIGN CONSTRUCTION DETAILS OF THESE HEADWALLS AND SCALE 1" = 60'
FES 46 336.00 CLASS "A" RIPRAP APRON - 6'Lx5'Wx6"TH WINGWALLS, CUSTOMIZED TO FIT THE SITUATION. THESE DETAILS MUST BE DESIGNED AND SUBMITTED TO CITY OF DURHAM ENGINEERING AND STORMWATER FOR APPROVAL 60' 0 60' 120'
FES 47 CONCRETE CHANNEL - SEE DETAIL. PRIOR TO BEGINNING ANY CONSTRUCTION. A RAILING MUST BE INSTALLED AT THE TOP 336.10 OF THE WALLS. SEE RAILING DETAIL. FES 48 335.90 CLASS "B" RIPRAP APRON - 27'Lx14'Wx12"TH OF 23

N \ N30'2o'33"w CLUSTER SUBDIVISION DATA Z N30'20'33"w TOTAL AREA: 30,34 ACRES (1,321,649 SF) 0
' ~ N30'20'33"W '33"W N 0'20'33"W I N3o'20'33"W N30'20 33 W 236.67' 6x.22' AREA IN NEW STREETS: 3.05 ACRES U 1=
157,15' L1 146.02' 131,60' 271,38' nW G • , , , •1~78.0'4~,',',' ' ' \ AREA IN OPEN SPACE: 2.66 ACRES ? U
~ 103,40' 1~~'~ ~ ~ ~ r ~ ~ o, •'OPEN,SPACE A,' o ~ m OPEN SPACE H ~ w - - - ~ ,o, ~ - ~ r- - ~ AREA IN FUTURE DEVELOPMENT: 2.78 ACRES Lu ~ w
w I I a ~ ~ '•'67 817 SF'.',' "1 ' 1 I \ AREA IN LOTS: 21,85 ACRES z ~ , I 3t A _ v> ~o
~ N I I g N 11,411 SF • ; / 1 ,z7~3~c~2~w:~:•:''''''' ','o' . ' I I ~ ' ~ TOT LOT ~ ~ , , ~ ,.o ~ ^ I \ 6 TOTAL NUMBER OF LOTS: 43 Z ~ ~ o I h a~ AVERAGE LOT SIZE: 22134 SF C7 ~
o I I N ~ - ,',y y I \ LOT 10 N I \ p z 0 , tii~ I ~ \ ti C Sj ZONING: R-20 w U ~
N LOT 33 w I I I I ' 'y o I ~ w LOT 32 LOT 21 ~i , , 1 $ '0. N30'20'33 W , , , , • ~ 20,030 SF ~ N I 1 I .W I , , , , ' c ' 20 295 SF ~ ~ I ~ ~ ? I , WATERSHED DISTRICT: E-B WATERSHED
1 I ~ 8 ~ I 20,005 SF s7,sa _ ~ 22,288 SF $ l:~ ~ „ ?y,~ I I INSIDE CITY LIMITS, INSIDE UGA o
I „~I \ ~ ~ Ip I s ~ I LOT 9 c^ PROPOSED USE: RESIDENTIAL W ~ , - ~ \ MINIMUM EXTERIOR LOT SIZE: 20 000 SF ~ ' ~ x
L 20,176 SF \ , w i ~ MINIMUM EXTERIOR LOT WIDTH: 100' ? N ~ Q
I I • I e• s~. I = I LOT 20 1 `o , , , , • . nW g ~ ~ \ / „ N 0'20 ~ I ~ \ ! I / / 'y ~ „ . \ EXTERIOR LOT MINIMUM SETBACKS: 35 FRONT; ~
162,33' ~ L - - - f 17,281 SF , , , I ' n I LOT 22 p ~ ~ 1 / ~RDPD$ED 30 ~9', , \ 30 TOTAL SIDE;12 SIDE ~ ~ LOT it \ 17,5 STREET SIDE• 25 REAR o U ~ o
~ N30'2033w ~ ° CITY OF DURHAM „ , ~ ~ m _ 1~6. _ _ I 17,446 SF ~ I / / , , 15,388 SF _ _ N c
m $ r - - - - - ~ / / / SANITARY SEWER ,y , I ( I y L EASEMENT L_- W Q=~ .W MINIMUM INTERIOR LOT SIZE: 10,000 SF w ~ 0 ~ 3
3 J a I '~A 1 ~ ~ "n O ~G, ' I I ~ I I ~ ~ oo S ~ SEE NOTE A ' ~ , , I ~ 13742 MINIMUM INTERIOR LOT WIDTH: 50 0 - , ~ a. .o
~ 1 LOT 34 I ~ $ I I I ~ N 1 ~ ~ / / c , , a a ~ 2 2o7r 1 , , a ~ ~ ~ I se' w , 1 LOT 19 ~ , , , , , , I _ - -'I INTERIOR LOT MINIMUM SETBACKS: 17,5 FRONT; ~ ~ ~ ~ o
~ 20,014 SF I c ~ I LOT 31 I o ~ 1~1r l 1 I f1i w N ~ I ~ ~ \ ~ , 15,332 SF I ~ J 17,503 SF / / 1 r" I 15 TOTAL SIDE; 7.5 SIDE w Z U m w h
' 8 ^ 17 T 1 ~ Z ~nU ti .5 STREE SIDE; 2.5 REAR o ~ - 29~W I I = o ~ 0
~ \ / I , 1 1.55 ~ 1 g ~ LOT 8 I w U Q 4 ~ a , STREET CONSTRUCTION DATA ~ ~
33 W I ~ \ ^ ~ ~ / \ / 20,055 SF ~ LENGTH OF NEW STREETS: 2635 LF TOTAL
204.41 ~ ~ LOT 23 ~ ~ ~ ~ m n ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ LOT 18 ~ _ I STREET CONSTRUCTION IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CITY OF / I DURHAM STANDARDS.
- - - - N3o'2o 33 w ~ 16 580 SF ~ ~ , , , 14s.o2' 17,303 SF , , , , LOT 12 ~
3 1 I N I ~ LOT 24 \ \ ti I 1 M 15,353 SF , , N07E "A'
~ I ~ w ~ PROPOSED 30 CITY I ~I ~ 18,634 SF ~ LOT 35 I 8 m N l sa m \ a l \ S30'20 33 E PROPOSED 3O FOOT YADE aTY OF DURHAM sANTARY SEWER EASEMENT,
ro I + m ~ ,r?~ OF DURHAM SANITARY ~ dl \ N 1 21,517 SF I 's ' I LOT 30 m' F SEWER EASEMENT cuRVE 4 ~ , , , . , ~ , 229.70' SUBJECT TO TERMS STALED IN THE DECLARATON IN REAL ESTATE BOON , 1510, PAGE p68, NO SiRUC1l1RES, FN.L, EMBANKMENTS, TREES OR , , / - - - - - - - - F~ 08STRUCTIONS PERMITTED WITHIN THE EASEMENT EXCEPT ACOORgNG TO
I ,p ~ n n ~ N~ I . , PT . z1+ea49 SEE NOTE A - 81-49-40 1 " ~ 16,026 SF ( R . ,60,00' '23 E , , , , , ~ g , THOSE TERMS PROPOSED I L20
I I m~ I 40'07 1 , , CITY STORM NOTE "B'
L-------------J ~ z14,zz' S t,6O' ~ I ~ i C~ I Dc . 38-11-50 15 , ~ I 1 M ~ DRAINAGE EASEME LOT 7 I sTREAN BUFFER: 6o FOOT 1Wgt ungSTURBED STREAM BUFFER EACH SIDE , \ " " N ~ Z OF STAEAII, MEASURED FROM TOP OF BANK, NO CLIEAR910 OR GRADING
S30'20 33 E ~ ~ ~ , , ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 820 2r ~ 8 N 226.69 ~ ~ ~ 12 38 a ~ ~ EE NOTE C ~ 26 249 SF I , OTHER TNAn sELECnvE THp1NU1c AND aRDINARY MAINTENANCE aF EXIS11nG , M ~ J ~ VECETAiION PERMITTED,
I , ~ Qp ~ , , - - - - - - 1 i ~ 1j•~' / 138•p4 PT ¦ 1 19.40 ~ PROPOSED 16 CITY c ~o
i r ~ z , ~ , ~ LOT 29 / ~ g I \ \ z I STORM DRAINAGE EASEMENT ~ „ „ , PROPOSED 10 FOOT NqE PUBLIC STORM WATER DRAINAGE EASEMENT. , , , '36'01°E _ _ J (SEE NOTE "c"). m ownERSHIP oF, AnD RESPan~eluTr FGR IMPRO~MENr ANO MAINiENANCE
I 4.00 *T ' / PROPOSED 16' Z Z \ , , ~ tt 15,420 SF ~ ~ I LOT 17 ~ , , \ ~ , , , • 1 , 2 - - - aF sTORl1 WATER FACIUnES IN THIS EASEMENT REMUns IWTH THE , S30'20 33 E
/ CITY T RM ~ ~ ~ , , I g S O I m a !pa LOT 36 \ / 1 DRAINAGE EASEMENT ro ~ N I 22,002 SF , , , ,'''PROPOSED 32''; 2 " GRANTOR. IF TI1E PROPERTY Is IWTHr1 OR BECOMES A PART OF THE arr, . , ,88' n1E EASEMENT AND ACCESS PAINTS m THE EASEMEnr ARE SUBJECt TO ','qTY STORM DRAINAGE' 0 280 11R; TERMS AND RESTRICTKXIS STATED p1 THE "REVSED DECLARA110N OF
1 1 ~ N N 25 371 SF ~ \ PROPOSED 16 CITY 1 (SEE NOTE C ' ~ ~ I \ ; 8 ~ - - - - - - - - - - RIGHTS AND PPoVILEGES OF THE a1Y OF DURHAM IN STORM WATER \ " " M 1 MANAGEMENT FACILITY EASEMENTS' RECORDED IN REAL ESTATE BOOK 2298,
N~ I ' I m ~ ' ~ 1 STORM DRAINAGE ~o LOT 26 1 LOT 25 I ~ I EASEMENT ~ ~o,• 1 I ~ EE NOTE D ' \ PAGE 208, WHK21 DOWMENT IS MICORPORATED HEREIN, iHIS EASEMENT LOT 8 I z AND REV1sED DECLARATION DO NOT CREATE THE oeuGATKXI ro PROVIDE
M n y , ~ \ (SEE NOTE D / ,m 17,487 SF 17,931 SF - _ _ _ _ _ \ ~ ~ PUBLIC MAINTENANCE NO BUILDINGS, STRl1CTLnES, FILLS, EMBANKMENTS OR \ 30,335 SF I ~ aesTRLICnoNS PERMITTED IWTHx1 THE EASEMENT EXCEPT AccaRaNC To
' a2'65 01 ~ ' / / ~ - a ~ y Pc 13+97.94 - - , $ ~o THOSE TERMS
/ LOT 28 ~ - , a , ~o'! f f j-r ~ ~ \ \ / ~ cv M ~ w~ I PROPOSED ~ „ , . 1 I , , - PROPOSED 30 CITY I ' N" NOTE ro' ~ ~ m PROPOSET) 32 FOOT HIDE PUBLIC STORM WATER DRNNAOE EASEMENT,
n , \ / / 15,36 SF ~ 1, N I CITY STORM ~ _ a I 01 ~ or _ _ ~ a tM \ , , N18;?g \ STORM DRAINAGE EASEMENT owNERSINP oF, AND RESPONSIBILITY FOR IMPROVEMENT AND MAINTENANCE Ot \ SEE NOTE "D" I aF sroRM WATER FAaunES ~ THIS EASEMENT REMUns WITH THE
4255 I I I DRAINAGE EASEMENT ' LOT 37 / / CURVE e ~ I R ' LOT 16 EASEMENT \ q, ( • \ ~ aRANTdI. IF n1E PROPERTY Is WITHIN oR BECOMES A PART aF THE an, , , , ~ `Z~ \ ~ THE EA9EA~NT AND ACCESS POp175 TO THE EASEI~NT ARE SUB,ECT TO
/ ~ I ¦ - 7- Z CURVE 5 ~ 1 BEgN NIDENING 42 ao 0 03 I I LOT 27 ~ _ srA: i 2a79 1 / / ~ ~ ~ R ¦ z6o.oo' I I I 9e 1o-zo 23,024 SF 23,813 SF / \ I R ¦ 165.1r 1 (OFFSET: 1200 R I , ' 1 • ' , • • ~ 'St' , ' 111E 1ERMS AND RESiRIC11ONS STALED IN THE 'REVSED q:CLARATION OF
/ \ ~L - 36x66' I 18,462 SF I / / / \ c ¦ zz-oz-1 I ~ 282.90' 1 1 ,ry \ RIGHTS AND PPoNLEOES OF THE aTY OF DURHAM 91 STORM WATER ~~v ~ 8 ~ ~ , ~ . • \ . MANAGEMENT FACILITY EASEMENTS' RECORDED pl REAL ESTATE BOOK 2298,
/ / ` I I Dc ¦ 34-42-D7 / / / ~ a I I ~ 1 1 ~ 'ry w ' S.~t>i h PAGE 208, WFNaI DOWMENT IS INCORPORATED HEREIN. 1HI5 EASEMENT OV` ~?S ~"W . , . \ N .99' AND REVISED DECLARATION DO NOT CREATE iNE OBLIGATION TO PROVDE
~ I / ~ 1~ ~ti I / / LOT 39 ~ I I g 1 1 / ~ \ ti / - / x'33 ~ I + END IMDENINC ~ ~ A ~PF~' a . , . , 2~ PU8l1C MAINTENANCE NO BUILDINGS, STRUCTURES, EELS, EMBANKMENTS OR 5 ' A V~ OBSTRUC110NS PERMITTED W11Hp1 THE EASEMENT EXCEPT ACCORgNC TO
~ 23 321 SF ~ J m T. 1+ 7 ~ , l / ' / 1 ~ I I S A, 658,5 V ~ ~ ~ ~ c~ / / \ PS 1 ~ ~ ~ OFFSET: 13.00 R ~ / ~ LOT 13 soFq GB 1 FUTURE DEVELOPMENT THOSE TERMS, 17,927 SF A'~G~ \
~;~F , , , • . , 120,952 SF ~~tir \ , , \ PROP09lT1p 17 FOOT IMDE PUBLIC STORM WATER DRAINAGE EASEMENT. L_~
I . / 'i,i / / \ 8207736"E - - ~ / ~ ~ ~ ~ / / / \ \ so. / LOT 15 CLIRVE 1 \ OWNERSINP OF, AND RESPONSIBILITY FOR IMPROVEMENT AND MAINTENANCE ~1 I ¦ 48-26-33 \ OF STORM WATER FACIUTRS IN THIS EASEMENT REMAINS VB1H THE
I / / / LOT 40 \ ~ ~ 1 / / / / \ 20,520 SF R •360,00' / \ GRANTOR. IF THE PROPERTY IS WITHIN OR BECOMES A PART OF THE pTY, L ¦ 295,92' / M \ , \ THE EASEMENT AND ACCESS PANTS TO iNE EASEMENT ARE SUBJECT TO
3 / PROPOSED 30 CITY OF / 16,522 SF / / 820 CURVE 3 ~ ' ^ \ \ Dc ¦ 16-22-13 ~ \ THE iEAMS AND RESTRICTIONS STALED IN THE 'REVISED DECLARATION OF / CP , , RIGHTS AND PRIVNJ:GES OF 7HE qTY OF DURHAM N1 STORM WATER
h , 1 / / DURHAM SANITARY / 738E 17 ~ do ~ I ¦ 1e-19-37 / \ ti , ro ~ R A M NT ~ / ~ 24.09' ~ A ti R • 181,00' / / \ ~ \ ~ / wed \ . , , \ MANAOEMEIIT FACILITY EASEMENTS' RECORDED IN REAL ESTATE BOOK 2298,
N n I / SEWS E SE E / PROPOSED 16 CITY ~ I (SEE NOTE A /STORM DRAINAGE ~ \ kz~ Dc - 31-3a-1e ~ 0~ ~ / PR P SED . , \ PAGE 208, WI11cs1 DOaIMENT IS INCORPORATED HEREIN, THIS EASEMENT \ ~ ~ O 0 \ AND REVSED DECLARATION DO NOT CREATE THE OBLIGATION TD PROVDE
rn LOT 38 EASEMENT 124 4 'F' ~v \ / CITY STORM \ , . 1 Pueuc MAINTENANCE no BILDINGS, STRUCTURES, Fllls, EMBANKMENTS OR \ DRAINAGE EASEMENT \ GBSTRUCT1oNS PERMITTED WITHNI THE EASEMENT EzcEPr ACCa1DwG io
(SEE NOTE D I 22,205 SF .a 0 - , ~ \ A / \ \ , , , , I nrosE TERMS.
~ ~ LOT 41 ~A - ~ x ~ I 1 ~ ~ v LE ~ - - ~ ~ \ . , ~ NOTE ~ \ w ALL Lots tO aE stRaDED eY PIILIC sErER AHD Wv11ER
13,185 SF ~ ~ / ~ ABLE PROPOSED P 1 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~rac s / /
J~ 5 SIDEWALK n ? C T 14 / I C85 / \ Q / / ~ 1 ~ \ ~ / 4 \ / / s ~~9 ~ . , , , , , N STREET AIO ONVENAY IMPACT m RRMIMI lWrflFER lIALL RBOUI[
/ / ~ / 20,246 SF 5 4 / / \ b. / 4 L_ l LOT 42 / A s w I , I _ . APPROVAL f11O11 iL C. IWMBION OF NfA1ER g1AL11Y.
~ 8 ~ LOT 43 / \ 99 / / w1' o ~ 14,387 SF / \ s~ h• / ~ / B~Oa't , I NOTE h1• / ~N P~ , , . FIND FIAT AND DEED DEgCATpKi RIONT aF WAY TO BE RECORDED PRIOR TO
~ / / 15,757 SF / Qp• / E~" P`''~' 13 ~ I \ n1E nsuANGE aF IWATA110 PEti1ML R ~ PO ~d \ / VIE \~o I . , . .
~ / / LOT 44 \ ~ \ / \ a \ e 1~ , , , NDTE r , ~ ~0' Q I NCOOT DRIVEWAY Pl7WT REOIAAED PROR 10 COi1911WIC110N,
/ 16,298 SF \ / ~ ~ ~ \ \ \PROPOSED NOTE 'J'
" " PROPOSED 30' ~ ~e' / G OPEN SPACE C / / ~ / , \ Z CITY STORM LOT 1 SHAH HAVE NO oDTECT ACCESS m GUESS aD, / LOT 2 \ , . , , . RAINAGE EASEMENT
G ~ CITY OF DURHAM G 36,741 SF / ~ F ~ ~ G SANITARY SEWER \ 9 ~ a. \ , q NOTE "IC 21,586 SF ~ , . n1E LocATK1n aF THE slDEwuxs SHOIW oN THIS PLAN q sa1EMAna A
4 EASEMENT " » .4~ \ •0~, 5 \ / / `'s \ , , , , 1 aTY aF DINIHAM/OR NCDOr ENf2t0Ap1MEN1 PERLAT Is REauIRED PRKXt To \ / / to . , , . , . ~ ANY CONSiRUCTl01l AF1ER OBTAMINO THE REQUIRED PERMITS, PLEASE \\1111111IIIllI/l/
G 4 SEE NOTE A . \ ~ :h~ ~ ~ ~ ~ / / \ . , . , to CA1TACT n1E q1Y aF DLIaHw ENGII+EERINO cGNSlRUCnaN IhsPECnoN \ / , . OFFlCE AT Bp0-4J2p Fd! A PRE-CONSTRlIC110N CONFERENCE NO A FlELD ~ ~ ^ • i
a`'' °Qi. s CURVE 2 G \ / 1 . , ~,•O to V1sr PRIOR To ANY WORK aN THE PROPOSED slDErllux, • ~ . / , / PROPOSED 1 ~ ~ .,~i ; \ ~"'Y
I 10-00-47 ~ ~ R ¦ 181.00' ~j, / CITY STORM I . Io noTE "L' ''9 ; \ / DRAINAGE ~ , , . , ' ~ i LoT 1 As PER DEED Boat us, PAGE e73-e76 sHAU BE sue,lECT To A
47 L ¦ 31,83 / , ~ END TAPER '1'i) G Dc ¦ 3t-39-18 / STA: 13+32,11 ~ Y3 D TAPER '1'j \ / O,1 .',y 1~ PERPETUAL CONIWUIN1i SCENIC EASEMENT, THE PROPERTY WILL NOT BE USED - SEAL A: 13+32,11 'y , / ~ ~ EASEMENT " " . , , ' . ' A AT ANY nME FOR ANYTHING OTHER iHAN ONE anGLE-FAMILY RESOO1nAl - =
. PCP , OFFSET: 1200 R , FSEt: 1200 R / LOT 3 SEE NOTE C ~1 ' y I DWEU.NO TWTH 9UPPgt11NG OUTBUILgNOS SUCH AS A GARAGE OR PUMP = ~ 15456 ; 8~. t~ ti ~ I , I HWSE, ETC,} NO MOBM.E HOME CAN BE LOCATED ON LOT 1. i
' LOT 45 / s~ / / PROPOSED 17 CITY / rygti / 61668 SF ..''o ~ ' ' ~ ~ , Q~.
STORM DRAINAGE ~ 15,011 SF / 'P \ EASEMENT / / \
G n » e~ / ~ /eEaN TAPER \ NOTE E ~p\ / ~ STA: 12+80.37 \ APER \ h° \ •o~ ' ~ , I/nlnll,nll\ +88.37 \ \ I 1 ~
~ ~1 ~ ~ / OFFSET: 17.D0 R \ PROPOSED ~ ,g'Sl 17.DOR '~~17A ~ , \ \ ~ rl •0 1 •s
5' SIDEWALK / \ OPEN SPACE CALCUL 0
NCDlOT 4' / I G i PROPOS D ''y'~'.'~'.'.'.'.'.'.', PROPOSED OPEN SPACE } \ ~ \ i~''n I '2' m
I I SIDEWAL \ ~ ' 0~ \ ')'/C lay I . . , , . 1 LOT AR A RE IR SF \ F ~ G1.., \ 11 1 4 1
~ ~ \ 9~ til 12 1 3 4 47
r'A ~
~0 G' 4 ' A U ~kd~ LOT , os LOT 1 18 17 7 \ •a ~ \
1 ~ S ~ 108,786 ds 106 786 SF ti, ~ 1s 17 a 7 \ ,y 20 17 1 71
11 ~ ~ ~d o \ \ ?Ji 5~9~ 22 17 4 4 ~ \ ~lj. F \ 23 1 4 ~
O ~ ~ T \ I \ \ . \ 44 1 1 a
~A +~0 \ X10 x 70 PROPOSED \ 25 17 1 U \ \ (n N
SIGHT CITY STORM \ ~ \ 26 17 7 1 w \ ,~0• \ 27 1 1 z o
~f TRIANGLE DRAINAGE EASEMENT L~ , ~ ~ (TYP,) ~ \ \ 28 1 4 Q
J „ \ 1 29 1 4 4 (n ~ / ^ \ ~,,~x \ 30 1 8 3 74 ~
/ ~ \ \ \ °0 31 1 4 LU
/ \ \ ,,p' 40 1 47 ~ \ \ 41 11 61
/ vo. \ \ 42 14 7 1
~ / / / \ e~/j \ 43 1 7 7 4 4 F
`SO' \ ti 1 3 70 p S G' / 45 15 11 4 989
~ s~ Fq \ ~ _ J ti 0k
s~ '(j ~ q _ _ _ . ~ TOTAL OPEN SPACE REQUIRED: 79,407 SF (1,82 AC.) w 9 \~1' _ . - PROPOSED OPEN SPACE: 115,969 SF (2,66 AC,) m
F F~, \ z
~G \ PROPOSED IMPERVIOUS SURFACE CALCULATIONS: DATE: 41O9IO2
95.7r IMPERVIOUS SURFACE MAY NOT EXCEED 24X OF LOT AREA. 2 \ JOB N0: \ SITE AREA: 1,200,697 SF 00208
CURVE TABLE MAX. IMPERVIOUS SURFACE ALLOWED: 288,167 SF
CURVE TABLE ROADS: 75,794 SF DRAWING: 00-208-04 CURVE LENGTH RADIUS CHORD DIRECTION CHORD SIDEWALKS: 10,190 SF
LINE TABLE LINE BEARING LENGTH CURVE TABLE CURVE LENGTH RADIUS CHORD DIRECTION CHORD C43 33,41 25.00 S11' 1' 7" 30.97 PUMP STATION: 7,717 SF DESIGNED: ~~/p
Lt CURVE LENGTH RADIUS CHORD DIRECTION C C21 21,38 170,00 57'4 ' 1"W 21,37 C44 82,96 1026,16 '3 ' 82.94 TOTAL MAX. IMPERVIOUS SURFACE ALLOWED FOR LOTS: 194,486 SF iRD DIRECTION CHORD C22 81,76 170,00 40'2 '58"W 80.98 C45 9&50 190,11 N3 "1 '09"W 97,40 AVERAGE MAX, IMPERVOUS SURFACE ALLOWED PER LOT: 4,522 SF DRAWN: LMH
~ " C1 281.86 976,16 S17'47'45"W Zi 517'47'45"W 281,08 C23 80.00 170,00 S16'2 '35"W 59.89 C46 114.50 1026,16 S11'I '41" 114.44 MAX. IMPERVIOUS SURFACE ALLOWED PER LOT: 4,500 SF
~ " C2 8,35 370,00 N7 ' 2' "W L4 " C3 66.09 370,00 N78'18'38"W 1 V7 ' 2' "W 8.35 C24 83.47 170,00 S04'1 '47" 63.10 C47 131,33 1026,16 S18 131.24 MAX. IMPERVIOUS SURFACE FOR LOT 3: 11,217 SF CHECKED:
L5 1' ' V78'18'38"W 88.00 C25 18.18 170,00 517'44'03"E 18.17 C48 97,70 285.00 N1 ' '23"W 97,22 HORIZONTAL SCALE: ' '57'39"W 181,57 C26 23.18 25,00 NOB'08'18"E 22.36 C49 61,30 1026,16 S2 5'08' 61.29 1" = 60'
L8 C4 162,88 370,00 '5739"W 1i L7 " C5 83.61 370,00 S '25'28"W ~ ~ '25'28"W 83.53 C27 71,94 50,00 SO ' 2'48"E 85.89 C50 61,00 1054.14 S '17'10"E 80,99
~ " CB 23,18 25,00 N86'13'21"E " C7 52,94 50,00 S82'27'23"W N86'13'21"E 22,38 C28 65,71 50,00 N7 3'53"E 81,08 C51 97,17 285.00 N08'56'51"E 96.70 SYMBOL LEGEND VERTICAL SCALE: 382'27'23"W 50.50 C29 59,88 50.00 N 6'18" 56,37 C52 13.75 1054.14 S2499'03" 13,75 NA
L9 C8 83,00 50,00 S16'01'44"W UO 7' ' S16'01'44"W 58.91 C30 37,28 50,00 N 7 '51"W 38.42 C53 50.00 285.00 N23'44'26" 49.94
fW F1 M FR M c.eti~Mo"r ~ c~eti~Mo"r dAA7 !!~1 7'{1A 75fl11 et~~n~'in"c 77.'SR (:5d 5.'S.iA 7R5.f1f1 N1dY17'FR"C .ri'i..'Sf1 ¦ EXISTING CON(:RFTF MONUMENT SHEET N0.
L11 vv -..vv ww.vv Jlw 1 / C10 48.08 50.00 N73'58'9» ' N73'56' 9" 46.25 C32 134.36 235.00 N '44" 132.53 C55 148.64 1912.51 '5 '41" 148.60 QQ EXISTING IRON PIN
L12_ S20-27-36-E 19,00, C11 34.79 50.00 N 627'35"E L13 T " N 6'27'35"E 34.09 C33 133.13 235.00 N 41 ' "W 131.36 C56 74.73 285.00 N47'00'36"E 74.52
L14 S20*27'36*E 34,09' C12 23.18 25.00 S '05'33"W 3 '05'33"W 22.36 C34 105.46 140.11 N4 '01' "W 102.99 C57 25.54 285.00 N 7'05'23" 25.54 Q IRON PIN SET
L15 N2624'5 'E 39,36' C13 146.24 330.00 S7 1'09"W L1g S08-05-13-W 10,00' C14 132.77 330.00 N 5' 4"W S7 1'09"W 145.04 C35 140.59 145.11 9'07' 7"W 135.16 C58 61.11 235.00 N5 12'27" 60.94 V 5' 4"W 131.88 C36 172.31 130.00 17'3 '40"W 159.97 C62 261.86 976.16 S1747'4 "W 261.08
L17 N30*20'33"W 50.00, C15 39.27 25.00 N 4' "W V 4' "W 35.36 C37 15.34 156.00 S1 '54'1 "W 15.34 C63 72.63 1004.14 S 2'35'17"E 72.61
L18 N39*43*22"E 5,13' C16 36.00 206.00 S1 "W L19 *42*05"W 20,80' ' C17 49.90 156.00 N17'1 ' 1" S1 "W 35.95 C38 41.18 25.00 S60'54'39"W 36.68 C64 11.89 370.00 S60'34'42"W 11.89 SCALE 1" = 60' N171 ' 1" 49.69 C39 541.48 976.16 S 9'21'16" 534.57 C65 110.04 1962.51 S 7'33'31"E 110.02
L20 N30-35-40-W 90,25' C18 33.28 25.00 N64 1'4" N 4'31'4 " 30.86 C40 93.09 1026.16 S 4' 0'30"W 93.06 C66 93.43 1912.51 S 7'22'07"E 93.42 60' 0 60' 1201
L22 N20-27-3 w 8,17- C19 63.38 185.11 N 7'09' 3"W ! J 7'09' 3"W 63.05 C41 94.18 1026.16 SOO'43'11"E 94.15 C67 60.89 976.16 50819' 6"W 60.88 OF 23
L23 S59*56'00*W 15,00' C20 70.00 185.11 S7 '12'04"W ! 572-12'04"W 69.58 C42 65.89 206.00 N17-15'0-1"E 65.61 C68 13.35 130.00 S58-25'30"W 13.35 0 i
T

i \ ~
01 \ ~ Z
i ~ ~
\ Z U \ w ~
OPEN SPACE "B" w ~ 1 ~
z N .o \ 1 -Z
LOT 33 ~ , 0 ~ 1 LOT 10 Z 0 ,
LOT 32 LOT 21 ' w U N
1 0
~ ~ 1 w a
b 1 m x
LOT 20 \ • "°°a
LOT 2 2 e LOT 9 w N " 1 ~ >N ~ LOT 11 ~
P MANENT MINOR 1 1 0 ~ ~ VOR 1 ~ry wZM o
RSION, ICAL. SEE DETAIL, 1 ~ N .
DETAIL, 1 W Q = ~ ~ w ~U~ 3 1 388 ~ ~ _ ~ 0
a LOT 19
LOT 31 LOT 34 o, ~ s U 0 U~~ m 1 I w Z U U w
M~' 1 I 4 ~ Z o°h°U = o~-
I` Z o='o I U
0 a' Q LOTS Q n.
6~' I
1
LOT 23 1
LOT 18 ~ LOT 12 1 )T 18
LOT 35 ~ LOT 30 1 1 DE1EN110N 1
LOT 24 ' 7 ,4 r 1 31 e ~ ,
i ~
35~ \ P LOT 7
5
~ ~ 1, 5 'T 19 s 5 ~ ~ ~
9
LOT 29 1 _ 3
~ ~ \ I~
LOT 36 2 i
~ LOT 1" LOT 17 s~ Newwuts ANO INNGWALLS Noy. ~
96 LOT 25 ~ ~o 1
1 LOT 6
1 s~ o~~-~a?~h CNId~EL 0 FES 47. 4 1
` ~
© LOT 37 LOT 28 ~ \ PERMANENT MEDIUM ~ \ \
LOT 2 f DIVERSION. LOT 16 ~ ~ N~o ~ \ TYPICAL. SEE DETAIL
\ ~1 MINOWALLS NO \
~ LOT 27 s LOT 26 ~ ~
w 4 ~ ~ 1~ w ~
3 )8 J N
S 1 S \ ~ FU TURF
\ DEVELOPMENT
4 LOT 39 LOT 13 \
a LOT 15 \ \
LOT 40 ~ LOT 15 ~ ~ 1 \
5
DE1a1110N ~ 3 ~ 1
~ ~ a
~ LOT 41 \ \ ~ ~ ~ ' .
~ ~ LOT 14 s s a,
~ ~S ~ ~w ~ _ I ~
LOT 42 LO j T 43 ~ I
s \ ~ M SS • I Z ss I \
\ ~A ~ I \
Sg ``I / ~
G a \ ~a a
~s \ 1
LOT 44 SS \ 1 W W J A
STORM DRAINAGE STRUCTURES TABLE , 1 1 w m
STRUCTURE TOP INV, IN INV. OUT R MA u, ''t+s ,~a E RKS ~ LOT 2 1 1 5 1 ; 4
CI1 _ w 397.30 390.30 N W CI 2 397.30 390.10 S 389.90 NE 1, 1 1 1
"ass CI 3 391,80 385.0 S 384.80 SE LOT 45 1 ~s 1 1 1
c CI 4 391,80 384.60 NW 379.00 SE 5 1 Q
JB 5 STORM DRAINAGE PIPE TABLE 388.00 373.50 N 373.30 SE ~ 1 1 1 U 1 1
FROM TO DIA, AT. LENGTH SLOPE 4`~ FES 6 371.00 CLASS "B" RIPRAP APRON - 12'Lx6'Wx8"TH 5 CI 1 CI 2 15" RCP 21' 1.OX W W B w ~1 1 1
CI 7 38 CI 2 CI 3 15" RCP 1 T ~ 2,00 374.40 6 2.9X W \ x 1 LOT 3 1 ~ ~3~
CI 3 CI 8 382.00 374.20E 374,00 N CI 4 15" RCP 21' 1,OX ,y 1 ~jl „
CI 9 CI 4 JB 5 W ~ / 377,00 369.60 SE 369.40 N 15 RCP 55 tO.OX 1
CI 10 375.00 ~ 5 FES 6 15" RCP 83' 367.70 S 2.8X ~ }
CI 11 375.00 367.50 N 367.30 ~ ~ ~4a ~ m ~ 1 1
367,50 SE CI 7 CI B 15" RCP 21' 1.OX k ~ a FES 12 370.00 CI 8 CI 9 15" RCP 96' 4.6X ~ 1 1
CI9 " ~ ~ h~ CI 13 376.00 366.70E 366.50 N CI 11 15 RCP 78 2.4X y 'h w 1 ~ y ~ ~ \ \
367,50 S CI 10 CI 11 15" RCP 21' 1.OX
YI 14 364,00 CI 11 CI 13 15" RCP 62' 1.OX 360.20 E FES 12 " ~ 1 1
YI 15 363,00 358.30 358.10 E CI 13 18 RCP 25 10.OX hti Z
358.30 S CI 13 YI 15 24" RCP 130' 6.3X ' 3 YI 16 367,00 356,80 356.60 ~ 14 11 15 15" RCP 33' 5.8X LOT i ~ ~ \ a
FES 17 356. " " _ YI 15 YI 16 24" RCP 63' 2.1 X 00 CLASS B RIPRAP APRON 12 Lx6 Wx14 TH 1 ~
RISER t8 360.00 355.90 ~ 6 FES 17 24 RCP 62 1.OX \ ~ 6 DE1F~l110N ~s ~ ~ ~ a.:~\ a \ ~ y
FES 19 355.00 CLASS "A" RIPRAP APRON - 6'Lx5'Wx6"TH RISER 18 FES 19 15"RCP 89' 1.OX ~9 6 \ Z o 9 A~.'~E:~' A p
CI 20 " CI 20 360.90 354,0 SE CI 21 15 RCP 21 1.OX \ ~ -
CI 21 360,90 353.80 NW 353,60 E CI 21 CI 22 15" RCP 31' 1,3X ~ i ; i >
CI 22 358,20 353.40 353.20 SE CI 22 CI 24 15" RCP 162' 3.2X \ W
FES 23 CI 24 30" RCP 35' a' FES 23 347.00 2.OX f~339" \ ~.:a
CI 24 352,90 3 .1 CI 24 CI 25 30" RCP 29' 1 46 0 N 346.00 NE .OX Y$, \ W
346,30 SW CI 25 FES 26 30" RCP 60' 1,OX ~ CI 25 352.90 344,70 SW 339.60 N ~ 27 FES 28 15" RCP 45' 1,OX \ H 3s o \ o
FES 26 339.00 CLASS "B" RIPRAP APRON - 18'Lx8'Wx14"TH PIPE 28 FES 30 15" RCP 38' 1.OX
YI27 354,50 339,50 ~ ~
FES 28 339.00 CLASS "A" RIPRA - ~ 31 FES 32 15" RCP 35' i.OX P APRON 6 Lx5 Wx6 TH PIPE 33 ~ m \ ~
PIPE 29 338.50 FES 34 15 RCP 45 1.OX FES 30 338.10 CLASS "A" RIPRAP APRON - 6'Lx5'Wx6"TH \ ~ \ z
DOUBLE CI 35 CI 36 15" RCP 21' 1,OX !y \ DATE:
CI 36 " ~ 11 31 356,50 351.30 N FES 37 15 RCP 85 1,OX ~ 4109!02
FES 32 351.00 CLASS "A" RIPRAP APR - " FES 38 YI 39 15" RCP 76' 10.2X ON 6 Lx5 Wx6 TH ~ 39 " \ JOB N0: \ 00208
PIPE 33 350.40 FES 40 15 RCP 49 1,OX \ DRAWING: 00-208-04
FES 34 349.90 CLASS "A" RIPRAP APRON - 6'Lx5'Wx6"TH PIPE 41 FES 42 15" RCP 46' 1.OX ~ ~ '
DOUBLE CI 35 349.50 340.00 N ~ 43 FES 44 15" RCP 24' 1.OX DESIGNED: SJB
CI 36 349.50 339,80 S 337,90E PIPE 45 FES 46 15" RCP 67' 1.OX DRAwN: LMHlSJB
FES 37 337,00 CLASS "A" RIPRAP APRON - 6'Lx5'Wx6"TH CHECKED:
FES 47 FES 48 54" RCP 54' 0.30X FES 38 347.00 HORIZONTAL SCALE:
~ 39 341,00 339.20 SE 337.50 1"=60'
FES 40 337.00 CLASS "A" RIPRAP APRON - 6'Lx5'Wx6"TH HEADWALLS AND WINGWALLS NOTE: VERTICAL SCALE:
PIPE 41 336,40 THESE PLANS SHOW THE PROPOSED CROSSING OF A NEUSE RIPARIAN STREAM AND BUFFER NA
FES 42 336.00 CLASS "A" RIPRAP APRON - 6'Lx5'Wx6"TH FOR BLACKSTONE DRIVE. IN ORDER TO AVOID COSTLY MITIGATIONS, IT IS NECESSARY TO LIMIT DISTURBANCE OF THE AFOREMENTIONED STREAM BUFFER TO WHAT IS SHOWN. SHEET N0.
YI 43 340.00 337.30 NE THIS REQUIRES THAT TALLER HEADWALLS (12' INVERT-TOP), AND LONGER 30 DEGREE
WINGWALLS (20' MAX.) MUST BE CONSTRUCTED. THERE ARE NO KNOWN STANDARD DETAILS FES 44 337.00 CLASS "A" RIPRAP APRON - 6'Lx5'Wx6"TH FOR THIS APPLICATION. IT WILL BE NECESSARY FOR THE DEVELOPER TO HIR
PIPE 45 E A 336.60 STRUCTURAL ENGINEER TO DESIGN CONSTRUCTION DETAILS OF THESE HEADWALLS AND
FES 46 336.00 CLASS "A" RIPRAP APRON - 6'Lx5'Wx6"TH WINGWALLS, CUSTOMIZED TO FIT THE SITUATION. THESE DETAILS MUST BE DESIGNED -N*141~ SCALE 1" = 60' 1 7
AND SUBMITTED TO CITY OF DURHAM ENGINEERING AND STORMWATER FOR APPROVAL FES 47 336.10 CONCRETE CHANNEL - SEE DETAIL. PRIOR TO BEGINNING ANY CONSTRUCTION. A RAILING MUST BE INSTALLED AT THE TOP
FES 48 OF THE WALLS. SEE RAILING DETAIL. 335.90 CLASS "B" RIPRAP APRON - 27'Lx14'Wx12"TH 60' 0 60' 120'
OF 23

TIE TIE . SUBDIVISION DATA N30'20'33"W N30'20'33"W
N30'20'33"W ' " 51.57' 85,x8' ~ TOTAL AREA; 30,34 ACRES (1,321,649 SF) N30'2033 W AREA IN NEW STREETS: 3.93 ACRES
' 50.00' N30'20'33"W 30'20'33" N30'20'33"W N30'20'33"W N30'20'33 N30'20 33 W 114.89' ' N30'20~~ "W ' . ' 267,54' 267,54' ENO coNSTRUCnoN ,gyp STA: 21+35.82 AREA IN OPEN SPACE: 0.23 ACRES
- 157.15' END cartsTRUCnoN 146.02' 42.26' 252.65' , ~ • . ~ srA: 24+55.60 \ fi9:32 • , , , . r------------~ N g r ~ \ , . ~•--------t 1ti+T~ v \ AREA IN LOTS. 26.18 ACRES
I LOT 11 1 ~ 1 ~ ~
I _ 1 \ TOTAL NUMBER OF LOTS: 45 W Z I 28 828 SF 1 ~ I \ A AVERAGE LOT SIZE: 25,342 SF i
~ • I I J I I I \ s~, \ LOT 22 \ ~ Lv....~. I ~ 1 0~ I \ 6e ZONING: R-20 ~ w
° 1 I m - ~o I \ ~ b \ 20 310 SF '^i ' N, o,.... . CURVE 2 I c WATERSHED DISTRICT. E-B WATERSHED Q 3 ~ N I I- t4-os-24 I I \ Sj ~ O ~
o I LOT 33 I ~ I I ~ w I \ ~ \ / ,~h p~' ^ N I LOT 32 I ~o \ s s~~ \ ,y. / ^ I 20,029 SF I ~ o I ~ / ~ I R .400,00' I \ Z INSIDE CITY LIMITS INSIDE UGA m ~ a
I 20,005 SF I o ~ \ ~ \ 0 / \ i I I I \ \ ~ LOT 21 / / , I I _ _ _ / ,r, ~ J I I ~ f I \ \ / 21145 SF ~ ~y"' / c . ~ -14-IS_zel \ ao s PROPOSED USE: RESIDENTIAL 0 w g I \ M NIM M T 4 Z~ Z
~ Pc - 20+a~,e~ I U LO SIZE: 20,000 SF ~ ~ x ~ ~ ~ ~ LOT 10 \ O S30'20 33 E ~ a Q LL E
L--------------J ~ N ~ I I I / 0 ry/ ~ ~ o I I / t~ /PROPOSED 30 CITY ~ ~ I \ F MINIMUM LOT WIDTH: 100 ~ -I w N o . , 22 483 SF ~ ~ ~ ~ 238.45 I ' \ MINIMUM SETBACKS: 35 FRONT; lL ° ~ ~ N ~ \ ~ > o v ~
0'20'33"E $ I I I LOT 23 / / OF DURHAM SANITARY ~ , , S3 I ~ C32 , ~ I \ 30' TOTAL SIDE;12 SIDE a ~ w z ~ o
' 20,132 SF , \ / / SEWER EASEMENT 182.33 Z ~ I 1 ~ ~ " / C / SEE NOTE "A" . . m N30 20 33 W I J ~ / " " "
1 I ~ 146.02' I I ` ~ ~ ~ . cti , , . ~ I I Z w ~ I \ 17.5 STREET SIDE; 25 REAR Q ~ ~ o ~ ? N I \ U w o=a ~ I LOT 12 I o ~ • ~ \ w o- -
~ I_ w I I ~ / LOT 20 / ~o o'c. I 22 829 SF N `0• ~ I \ STREET CONSTRUCTION DATA Z o 0 0
~ • I I N w I I ~ ~ I I too ( 29,031 SF R~...~ , • ~ ~ I I ° N LENGTH OF NEW STREETS: 2635 LF TOTAL ~ ~ v ' I I o e ~
~ vi I LOT 34 I I I w ,,J ro2c'zr t \ ~9 y..... p I I ~ ~ N I ~ W -tot ~ t ~ , 69 p~ / . . I m N30'2033W STREET CONSTRUCTION IN ACCORDANCE WITH TH 2 ~Jo I E w . ~ I i 172.58 CITY OF DURHAM STANDARDS.
n ^ I 20,014 SF N I I , p"~ ~a ~ , ~ ,yo , , ~ to I I ~ J I I g S42•161 ~ / / ' . 8 , . L----------J
I ~ w ~ LOT 31 I 124'x°` C w, • . . " ~ I I S30 20 33 E I I
" 0 8 I 20,005 SF I ~ C ~ , • , • 196.38' ~ I I
S30 20 33 E I I o f \ g ~ • . r----------, a I I ti
a.41' ~ I I ~ w I LOT 24 \ c3 s , ~ I ~ N I 20,280 SF LOT 19 ~ ~ ~ . t I I 1 ~ m I I
3 I I ~ °o I I ~ I \ 23,671 SF N • ~ • ~ I b N I LOT 9 I .a NOTE A ~ v , NQ • , . , , LOT 13 I u I 28,846 SF I ~ PROPOSED 30 FOOT WIDE CITY OF DURHAM SANITARY SEWER
• + • • I ~ I I EASEMENT, SUBJECT TO TERMS STATED IN THE DECLARATION IN '.f, , . 31,248 SF I z I I REAL ESTATE BOOK 1510, PAGE 958. NO STRUCTURES, FILL,
~ ~ ` ..f. N ~ 1 I ~ co - - "1- ` PROPOSED 30 CITY 1 Z I ~ ~ I I co ~ N30'20'33 W ~ Of DURHAM SANITARI~ ~ J I ~ Oa ~ ~ ' ' ( ~ ~ ~ EMBANKMENTS, TREES OR OBSTRUCTIONS PERMITTED VWTHIN THE , I I
~ ro I LOT 35 I . SO?, SEWER EASEMENT I ~ A LOT 25 ~ ~ ~ ~ • y 21518 SF I ~ ~ 146.02 d?, SEE NOTE "A" , I I cuRV~ e \ 1 "W , I ~ 4 2 ~ ( ) 120,836 SF \ 19 • ' i N ~ I I EASEMENT EXCEPT ACCORDING TO THOSE TERMS. N L--------------J
1 I ~ ~9 ,3ly I o N I I 1eo-oo-ao \ ? N4135 I ~ ~ 0 ~ I R . 19250' \ ,89 ~ ' ~ • I oo J NOTE "B"
- I PT . 22 09.51 ~ \ - _ _ I m I L - 62a48' \ $ 185 . • • . , • • • I ~ N30'20 33 W L1 STREAM BUFFER: 50 FOOT WIDE UNDISTURBED STREAM BUFFER ' ' , ' ' I ~ 243.40' EACH SIDE OF STREAM MEASURED FROM TOP OF BANK, NO
L--------------------J ~ 44 ~ ---J I Dc ¦ 29-00-38 / N ~ " N g I ~ •8 , d• ~ ,y ~ S30'20 33 E I / 4 ~ _ _ - - - / . , . ' ' ' ' ' ' ' I CLEARING OR GRADING OTHER THAN SELECTIVE THINNING AND • ~ t0 r------------------------ 1
/ S20~7~ " , y"E BEGIN PROPOSED 226.89 1 / 36 E ~i 351 . SA1 ~ 30' CITY OF DURHA • • ' ~ . , ' ' , ' ' I ~ W I I ORDINARY MAINTENANCE OF EXISTING VEGETA110N PERMITTED. I o co I LOT 8 1 z
r-----------~ 1 LOT 30 h 100.00' S202p36" 144.75 I 1 E ,'1 (SANITARY SEWER ~•'A. ~ A. I w ~ I 27 283 SF 1 ~ o NOTE "c"
I I 1 20,018 SF / / 51.00' n (EASEMENT " N I I 114.00 1 ~ o ~ ~ I ~ I ' 1 $ ~ PROPOSED 16 FOOT IMDE PUBLIC STORM WATER DRAINAGE p,N ' 1 23.42 1 ~ ~ EASEMENT, OWNERSHIP OF, AND RESPONSIBILITY FOR ~.0, , . I ,
/ .1~ ° ,i' ~ I ~ ((SEE NOTE "A t~,p. 1 I 1 /„,~ti , ~ ~ 1 PROPOSED 18 I I ' ' ' ' PROPOSED 30 CITY OF DURHAM 1 ~ N IMPROVEMENT AND MAINTENANCE OF STORM WATER FACILITIES
3 I LOT 38 1 ~ 1 ,/,,6 0 ' ^ ~ 1 CITY STORM I I LOT 18 ~ . . . , , • •FROP.O$~D, ~0 'CITI" , I SANITARY SEWER EASEMENT I IN THIS EASEMENT REMAINS W11H THE GRANTOR. IF THE . , S7URM DRAINAGE: ' ~ 8 ~ I SEE NOTE "A" . I PROPERTY IS WITHIN OR BECOMES A PART OF THE qTY, THE
~ " I 1 ~ ' ~ / ` ~ 1 DRAINAGE EASEMENT( I 24198 SF o ° I 25,371 SF 1 w ~ , n " » • ~ N ~ _ _ _ _J EASEMENT AND ACCESS POINTS TO TH A M NT AR • . 'EASEMENT • i E E SE E E
a ~ I 1 a \ , ` 1 (SEE NOTE C • ~ I 1 ~ \ / / LOT 29 ~ ~ ~ - ' " ~ SUBJECT TO THE TERMS AND RESTRICTIONS STATED IN THE •SEE MO.TE.•.~D. N30'35'40"W REVISED DECLARATION OF RIGHTS AND PRIVILI:GES OF THE
~ I "E ~ / 20,077 SF 1 v~ • I 1 1 I N27"IS' " ' • 284,35' CITY OF DURHAM IN STORM WATER MANAGEMENT FAgLITY
~ A2'S5p1 / I N o l I Ln l LOT 28 I 22 w 23t.1s ' • j~21~E'... E N " R 18 •.S~g 3..,,,,•. ASEME TS ECORDED IN REAL ESTATE BOOK 2298, PAGE
I, 2~ oo \ SRO osEO 1s' CITY I ° LOT 28 I I 1 ~ d 1 20,124 SF / I / ~ ~.'.'1'1~~68, ' PROPOSED 20' CITY 208, WHICH DOCUMENT IS INCORPORATED HEREIN. THIS ~ ~ • ' ' , . STORM DRAINAGE EASEMENT ~ EASEMENT AND REVISED DECLARAnON DO NOT CREATE THE
S 1 TORM DRAINAGE I I N 1' > h 1 / . , , , , " » ~ co OBLIGATION TO PROVIDE PUBLIC MAINTENANCE NO BUILDINGS, (SEE NOTE D 7 O ~ STRUCTURES, FILLS, EMBANKMENTS OR OBSTRUCTIONS
~ E MENT I rn I 20,513 SF I ,M c I 1 ~o, 1 / N / ~ 0 ~ I °fN I 1 4, 1 / U 1 / ~ ~ ` ~ (SEE 1VQTE D I I I y I LOT 27 1 1 / / / ~ in ~ PERMITTED W11HIN THE EASEMENT EXCEPT ACCORDING TO THOSE # 30,429 SF N N, TERMS.
1 ~ I ~ I I 120,034 SF 1 1 / I / • ' • ' r^
1 LOT 37 ~ 707-~ I e I I I 1 1 , / LOT 17 / , ~ , ~ F 8 . . .ti , / A~~..r ^ NOTE D •
23,812 SF ~ Q, R 25abB:~f ~I I ~ 22,067 SF / A° ~ / / , I'Q q / F G ' ' • • • PROPOSED 20 FOOT WIDE PUBLIC STORM WATER DRAINAGE H 1~ / , q 9~/ .pR'OPOSED'...•.~. , _ » EASEMENT, OWNERSHIP OF, AND RESPONSIBILITY FOR
1 1 1 \ \ C L -1 H ~ - - , I I 1 BEgN IMOENING ~ ~ / 1~ ,~'y' / I N 1 ~ ,~~y0• 40 Dc 22 02 3 n , - - - I ~ ~ STk 15+81.10 ~ \ / ~ , ~ ~ / ASF p N30 3540 W / ~ ~ IMPROVEMENT AND MAINTENANCE OF STORM WATER FACILITIES
W O, ~ 'y~ n - - - - END WIDENING Gry / ~ ~S ~6" ~ / ~ / 23 ~ LOT 14 ~~ti~ . , p. , .I AGE.'EASEMENT 329.24 IN THIS EASEMENT REMAINS WITH THE GRANTOR. IF THE / v SEE.'N>OT.~'.ME~};•''•',:.•.... PROPERTY IS WITHIN OR BECOMES A PART OF 1HE qTY THE 23,267 SF w ....f....... H
I 1 .•a W 1 6,~9 xe S srk 15+89.72 / 4,sp, w ,~0 / I ry" 1 ~ 1p,~,, 20~~36"E ~ OFFSET: 13,00 R / / . , , • • : . • • ~ LOT ~ ~ EASEMENT AND ACCESS POINTS TO THE EASEMENT ARE
I f 1 i' ~ ~ \ ~ ~ MD 94, 00' a ' I~¦~23-506-37 ~ ~ A°' \ CURVE 1 • o SUBJECT TO THE TERMS AND RESTRICTIONS STATED IN THE ~ I • ,a-26133 ~ ~ 38,18$ SF ~ ~ "REVISED DECLARATION OF RIGHTS AND PRINLECES OF THE
I 1 1 ' \ / ~ L ¦ 7ao~ S~ \ R . 3 1 ~ s0 s! ~ L - 2 .A2' N 0 ' , , • ~ ~ ~ CITY OF DURHAM IN STORM WATER MANAGEMENT FAgLITY ~ ~ W ~ PROPOSED 20 CI w, N
3 \ + 1 ~i / ~ ~ t8 ,8 , $ \ De ¦ 31-39-18 n ~ \ • I ~ / ~ X07 $ y w \ / ~ ~ .c ! ~ Dc y16-22-13 ~ ' . , . , , , STORM DRAINAGE ~ EASEMENTS RECORDED IN REAL ESTATE BOOK 2298, PAGE / 9 ~ . , , . • , 208, WHICH DOCUMENT IS INCORPORATED HEREIN. THIS
o ro ~ ~ LOT 39 \ .~v / ) CS r~ E - 124. 17 .r \ ~ , ~ aA Q0, N I ~ a / / ? 09 ~ < ~3°° LOT 18 / ~ / \ ~Q. 1 ~ aA ` p'~ ,,e ~ EASEMENT ~0+~ ? ~ ~ . , , • • . " " EASEMENT AND REVISED DECLARATION DO NOT CREATE THE ~ ~0• !y ~ ~(p. , . , (SECv ND1E D)~ OBLIGATION TO PROVIDE PUBLIC MAINTENANCE NO BUILDINGS,
I 1 ~ 28,381 SF 'o ' , LOT 40 / . ~ ,ti's ' / ~ \ ~ ~ N I ),a`' / / o / N20~r 1 t • 20,149 SF / ~ ~ ~ ' STRUCTURE FlLL M ANKM TR TI N
ti I ( / ~ ti , 22,787 SF / ~ / ~ 36 w Q \ , / \ 1 / tip 0~ ~ ~ 124.09' CS ~ \ ? / ~ / \ CI! '07"W S, S, E B ENTS OR OBS UC 0 S ~ ~ C3 ,egg 55 PERMITTED VWTHIN THE EASEMENT EXCEPT ACCORDING TO THOSE \ k ~ / , . .88' , . , TERMS.
I ~ / / ^ / ~ ~ 6 e •ti • \ I 1 1 PROPOSED 30 CITY OF / / / LOT • 41 ' ~ C~C p / \ ~ ~ ~ 2~
1 / / / Y I,~ PROPOSED > ~ ~ / LOT 38 Z 1 DURHAM SANITARY / / / / 20,108 SF / 5' SIDEWALK ~ , ~ / ^ h/ ~ I ~ / / 1 1 JC ? ~ / a s / ~ , ~ _ ~ NOTE "E'
> o SEWER EASEMENT / ~ / ~ LOT 15 I 22,204 SF o 1 " • / / / ~ I W I 7 . ,r-_,. _ ~ f / G~' Ca ~ Z, ALL LOTS T1D BE SERNCED BY PUBLIC SEWER AND WATER. ? N ~ ~ NOTE "F"
1 1 N ~ 1 (SEE NOTE A , I . r I • ~ i 21185 °$F / 't / / / PROPOSED 1$ CI'~1' 0 7 / ~ / ~ R ~P 33 ' • ~ ~ STREET AND DRIVEWAY IMPACT TO RIPARIAN BUFFER SHALL
I -1 / / .wry / STORM DRAWAGE I N • I I I / l~ / / r^ o EASEMENT ' / / / ~ ' ~ PG1 C9 • ' . I J ~ RE IRE APPROVAL FROM N. C. DIVISION OF WATER TY.
o --J ' / SEE NOTE 'D" . ~ 1 I I / / \ i h / N ( ) r n LOT 42 I / / \ \ / ~ ` etc 15~' ~ " . , • a N, QU auw h / o e~ Qe / v' LOT 5 ~ NOTE 'G"
a 1 2 1 20,025 SF / •O ~ / LOT 43 / \ is ~ ~ bO,.1' CURVE 3 'h 0~ / I • z9-42-37 ~ 23 580 SF FlNAL PLAT AND DEED DEDICATING RIGHT OF WAY TO BE
C45 7 ~ 5 JI 1 1 ~ I / •4Y / h y ~ / C5 I I o~ ~ I / ,off , / ~ ~ S \ / 0 / n ^ 20,078 SF / a 'PROPOSED 30 ` \ ' 1 / R ¦ 200.00' I ~ • • • RECORDED PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMIT. t~ L ¦ 10x71' ' Obi ~ a ~ ' ' ' .
C4 I = I / A ~ /CITY OF DURHAM ~ chi v ~ - I 1 " ~ / oc 2e-3e-52 I ` q, , N28'13 01 W NOTE 'H'
S3 I I c~ ti / SANITARY SEWER bs. ~ 1 ~ • ' ' 239,fi3' NCDOT DRIVEWAY PERMIT REQUIRED PRIOR TO CONSTRUCnON.
/ / / EASEMENT ~J+ C20 ~ / / / " / cpj• F ` o • ' LOT 2 1 `a. " - ,00 ~ ~0 PROPOSED I NOTE I `~~Ilunnlll//// ~ 29,224 SF • . • . > Z LOT 1 rk LOT 38 SHALL HAVE NO DIRECT ACCESS TO GUESS RD. lei,
/ / SEE NOTE A . / ~ ~ ~p ' ,g 1 . 20 ACCESS 1 ~ ~1 ~ ,
~ / LOT 44 h / ~ ~ 1 y0• ~ . ' . EASEMENT I o •,~y
/ 20,333 SF a / i :R1aao-4~ ' ~ ~ ~~i ti ~ i~,'yti~ ~ 1N,1 18'•'CITY'.S M•'.•.•.,~ G 1 ~ NOTE J ! ~ T~.... ! ~ ~ 'S ~ \ LOT 4 • N THE LOCATION OF THE SIDEWALKS SHOWN ON THIS PLAN IS - SEAL -
~ y / R .181,00' ^ ys• ~ ~ ~ ~ / L ¦ 31,83' / ? V END TAPER ~9, TAPER S? ` ~ 9'~~'~ \ EASE 1•~•'' ~•'.'.'.~..F' Z 41,015 SF 1 to SCHEMATIC. A qTY OF DURHAM/OR NCDOT ENCROACHMENT _4i = J;t+ v ~ ~ \9 Z , , MEN ~ , 16 GI 1 PERMIT IS REWIRED PRIOR TO ANY CONSTRUCTION. AFTER ~ 15456 ;
CS ~ ~ ~ / _ _ / QC' +y1 STk 13+32,11 ~ ~ / Dc 31 39 18, ~ OFFSET: 13.80 R ~ F ~T3 t3~.bp R \ •(~5~.'~~TE••~•~~~''..':'.9 OBTAINING THE REQUIRED PERMITS, PLEASE CONTACT THE qTY ~
/LOT 45 ~ 'ya ~ 70 LOT 3 \ ~ ~ • ~ OF DURHAM ENgNEERING CONSTRUCTION INSPECTION OFFICE AT '••,t~•., I ~ / ~ i ry'YI
/ / / / 1~` 6~ / ~ ' ! / 20,962 SF / ~ ~ / ~ / \ 1,1 • > 580-4328 FOR APRE-CONSTRUCTION CONFERENCE AND A FlELD pis ~ 9• ~ 38,928 SF / 1 \ ~s • . , . i> NSIT PRIOR TO ANY WORK ON THE PROPOSED SIDEWALK. ~~i/ W P V~~~
~ / / ~ / 50' PUBLIC ROW s'9 / / ~ \ t^ T ~ 11111 111~~ "
~ / BEgN TAPER ~'r ~ / A / STA:12+88.44 ~ C ~ / ~ ~ / OFFSET: 17,60 R ~ 'ER ~ h ~ / ) O.•'•'...~..'.'. i ~ NOTE K" 06.44 ~ / 1' > • ' ' 1'~' g'S LOT 1 AS PER DEED BOOK 435, PAGE 873-875 SHALL BE
EX. FlR qS / 1 ~ti / ~ 5' 7' 2fi' BACK TO BACKSTREETWIOTH 12' HYDRANT ~'r ~/ry Cs ~ ~ / Z50 R ~ hry ~ / ~ • ' ' ; ~ 'Sa' SU T A PERP TIN IN NI A M NT, TH ~ BJEC TO ETUAL CON U G SCE C E SE E E ~ 'C' ~ . ' ' ' PROPERTY WILL NOT BE USED AT ANY TIME FOR ANYTHING OTHER
~6• F ? PROPOSED ' f ~ NCDOT / \ } S ~ S ~ / , , • . THAN ONE SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DWELLING WITH m ~
/ +~I' I I Wq PROPOSED 5 SIDEWALK ~ , ~ ~ I ~ • , . SUPPORTING OUTBUILDINGS (SUCH AS A GARAGE OR PUMP J ` ~/t1 tD HOUSE, ETC.). NO MOBILE HOME CAN BE LOCATED ON LOT 1,
~ ~ fit' SIDEWALK , ' R ds / Mq/ )4 33 / /
H .8 , f ~J / ~A ~ ' ~ ? S. 4iF Ng'1
24" 11' AT 2°k SLOPE ~Q Gj~ ~ A x ? . N 432 ~ sir 9 r 6 p 3 F ~S. W
CURB d GUTTER 1 V 1--~" I.2INITIALLYWITH 2' Os A 1" DELAYED OVERLAY 1.OP~ I ~ ~V ` N.~~s Z ~
0~ S I E 2°k SLOPE 8" ABC STONE BASE 2% SLOPE I I ~ ~ 1 D' % 70' ` 1^ 0 ~ TOT LOT ~
SWOP „ I C~ 0 P~titi .1 s 0 SIGHT z l T ~ ~ ~ 10 205 SF PROPOSED IMPERVIOUS SURFACE CALCULATIONS: ~ ~
Q TRIANGLE LOT 1 SIDEWAL COMPACTED SUBGRADE w ~ ~s, LOT 1 ' ti Oti' ,00, ~ ~ Q ~ ~ ^ IMPERVIOUS SURFACE MAY NOT EXCEED 24X OF LOT AREA. w Z
a 95%STANDARDPROCTOR 1P ~ Q 108,484 w ~ 0 SANITARY SEWER LATERAL MIN SLOPE 1!4"lFT. w 106,484 SF ~ R A' 1 t 4 Z ° - ~ ti ^o, SITE A E . ,32 ,6 9 SF ~
rc w Oa w w a w ~ ~ MAX. IMPERVIOUS SURFACE ALLOWED: 317,196 SF ~ J ROADS: 85,643 SF N ~
~ ~ S till SIDEWALKS: 10,735 SF ~ 0.
J a w ~ F 1.0 6. ys, ,h~ PUMP STATION: 2,589 SF W ~ ~j ?9. M ~ TOTAL MAX, IMPERVIOUS SURFACE ALLOWED FOR LOTS: 218,229 SF
N Z ~ ~ NOTE: LOCATION OF WATER, SEWER ~ 'gyp, F ~ 0 AVERAGE MAX. IMPERVIOUS SURFACE ALLOWED PER LOT: 4,849 SF ~
~ AND STORM DRAINAGE MAY VARY, O ti h0• ~ ~ O
N SEE PLANS FOR ACTUAL PROPOSED LOCATIONS. ~ ~ \ ` ¢ N
SCENIC EASEMENT RESIDENTIAL LOCAL STREET WITH CURB ~'i D,8.435 PG.873 .~v ~ \
L. BENTON STREET & REYNOLDA CIRCLE (STA. 15+89.68 - STA. 24+55.50) • / ,h~` ao
e~ w _--J ti 0V`' m
~ ~ ~
40' PUBLIC ROW 50' PUBLIC ROW DATE: • ' 0"E SYMBOL LEGEND 8101101
S35 48 O JOB N0: 295.77' 00208
8' 24' BACK TO BACK STREET WIDTH 8' 5' 6.5' 27' BACK TO BACK STREET WIDTH 11.5' ~ EXISTING CONCRETE MONUMENT DRAWING:
CURVE TABLE Q EXISTING IRON PIN 00-208 CURVE TABLE CURVE RADIUS LENGTH DIREC710N CHORD DESIGNED: ~VVP
CURVE RADIUS LENGTH DIREC710N CHORD C23 N70'14' 1 CURVE TABLE ~ IRON PIN SET
Ct 7 .1 ' 1 147' t ' 1'4 "W 1 1.17' C24 17 1, N81 '11"W 1 CURVE RADIUS LENGTH DIRECTION CHORD DRAWN: C2 7 . 4 7' N7 ' 7"W 4. C25 17 7 7 ' 77 1'44"W 7 7' C45 1 1 1' 1 4' '41"E 1 LMH
10' AT 2% SLOPE C4 1 .7T 1'11'5 "W C28 17 4 ' "W .7T C48 5 N '44' 4 4' CHECKED:
24" 11' AT 2% SLOPE CURB & GUTTER 1 I-21NITIALLYWITH OPE 2'1 CURB & UTTER , , 1 UNE TABU: C5 ,1 ' '4 "W 4, C27 17. 1 1 "W C47 1 1 1' 77 4' T 't " 77 4'
A 1"DELAYED OVERLAY COZ S~ A ~ DELAYE OVERLAY ~oP~ ~ UNE DIRECTION DI$TAI TABS Cs N ' 4" 4 ,11' C28 17. ' 4"w C48 717' N ' t" 7 ' HORIZONTAL SCALE:
S"ABC STONE BASE 2°h SLOPE ~S S :CnON DISTANCE C7 78. N11' '47" C29 217 7 T 11 4'14" 78.1 ' C49 7 1 ' 4 4'1 " 1" = 60' . CB ~ 4, N '4 ' 1"W •,11' C30 N "E .7 ' C50 1 414' 7 '17" 7 . 1' VERTICAL SCALE:
1.~51'OP~2%SL PE ,1 2%SLOPE 8'ABCSTONEBASE 2%SLOPE G L1 N ' "W F~ ti,1 s" S~OP~ 2 s, L2 ' TW 71 i W C9 71 ' 7' "W 8 .81' C31 7' 1 ' 8"W .74' C51 1 1 1' 1 7 ' '1 ' 1 .7 ' NA I ' 7"w 717'
nnuennTCn eneeoene I c11.L _ I ~ utrao'~n"e 19 n C10 1, 1' N 4' '1 " 1. C32 ' 1' "E t' C52 7 7 ' N1 ' "W 7 ' io~~n"c ~ ~ na'
95% STANDARD PROCTOR y COMPACTED SUBGRADE L4 "7T 4' 00 " 1 i4' 1 C11 220.00' 103.70' 16'11' "W 102.75' C33 57,00' N80*23'20"E 53,96' C53 976.16' 14 1 ' 7' 145.39' SHEET NO.
95% STANDARD PROCTOR LJ 71' 4' 1 1 SANITARYSEWERLATERAL MIN. SLOPE 1/4'/FT. a SANITARY SEWER LATERAL MIN. SLOPE 114'hT. L6 $ 1 W 39. 71' N44' 33,50' C34 50.00' 69.76' N07' 64,24' C54 976.16' 111 11 11.4' i4' 162.10'
w o o z w a" 15'1 "W 39.06' C13 375.00' 7 4'44' "W 27.25' C35 0. ' N '52'10"W C55 222,50' 103.64' N 3348'14"W 102.70'
w w L7 1 W 4. " } v m o o L8 '50 20. )5'13'W 4 .95' C14 375.00' 104.01' S74'4 ' "W 103,68- C36 25.00' 22.43' S47'49' 21,68' C56 34.18' 7' '31 *E 1,58' 1150"W 20.73' C15 375.00' 63'12 5 5 C37 177.50' 195.56' 6 W 185.82- C57 976.16' 71 '4 B E 70,98'
W 1.0 4. co 1'11 W 7 r w < to s. L9 S41 1 "W 1( 1 '1 "W 10' C16 4 98.72' 3'00'1 ` 98.49' C38 177.50' 244.96' S80'32'0 "W C58 ' N1 ' ' 1" 53' C17 375.00' 8, 5 *0'47"W 98.6V- C39 17.0' 119,81' N40'21' 5"W 117.41' C59 976.16' 1,17' SOO*59'54"E 91,14'
U) L L10 S 7 30.0 s to a U) L11 ' ' 7"W 21.9 !7* 30.09' i ' 7"W 21,99' C18 9 63'0610 39.06' C40 235,00' 152.60' N00'23 W 14.4 C60 1 7, `W 7
y o L12 S71'42'05 "W 0.8 r C19 235,70' 7'19' 6"W 230,56' C41 235,00' 170.00' N ' 1 C61 p "w SCALE 1 - 60 ' 3 W 0.80'
cn L13 N4 1"W 42.1 1"W 42,16' C20 25,00' 39.27' N 6'54'O W 35,36' C42 285,00' 25.54' N57 '3 4' C62 976.16' 92,99' 4 '24'22"W C21 ae.oo' 1 "W T35795' C43 285,00' 74.73' N4 "E 74,52 C63 78.1 ' 111' 77' "W 1.11 60 0 60' 120
RESIDENTIAL STREET WITH CURB RESIDENTIAL LOCAL STREET WITH CURB L14 1'11' "W 15.6 HOPKINS GROVE & REYNOLDA CIRCLE (STA. 10+00.15+89.68) YATES DRIVE L15 S 'i "W 10. 1' "w 15.62' )5-13-W 10. 00, C22 1156,00' 1 62.92' 1 N1 ' ' 1" 2, ' C44 1285,00'1 53,38' 1 N 4 7' 53.30' C64 235 00' 1 6 S19*43'43"E 6.00' OF 5

\
i
5Tk 1+72,33 ~ +Ba~o Pt • ~ U
8 RIM ELEV.: 395.23 . INV. IN ELEV.: 388.33 ~ • , • w 2 ' ' LOT 11 1L ~
INV. OUT ELEV,: 38223 la ~ ~ ' ' ~ DROP MANHOLE Op ~ • . a PLUG W ~ • . • . STk 21+45.82 p Z ~
8' PLUG ~ e Q3 ~ N ~ 8>p ~ ~ ~ r".
STA: 24+85.50 LOT 22 \ ~ ° 9, ~ . 1 . , MH 5 STk 20+88.89 C$ ? m y o a
0~ LOT 33 PROP05ED 37 aTY . ' OFFSET: 1.00 L ~ ~ O ~ a . " ' ' ' RIM ELEV.: 371.81 Z u~ Z w V
LOT 32 0 OF DURHAM SANITARY . , SEWER EASEMENT ~ . . . ' INV. OUT ELEV.: 380.81 w ~ , } o Q NULL E
MH 8 ~ MH 10 MH 18 STA: 10+45.18 ~ J w N p 7 7 ~ ~ n U
STk 23+9250 OFFSET: 17,00 L STk 3+56.88 • . a OFFSET: 3,00 R STA: 0+00 RIM ELEV.: 370,10 . . B4K IN ELEV.: 384.20 ,
RIM ELEV,: 405.88 RIM ELEV,: 397.55 ,(Y INV. OUT ELEK: 384.10 INV. OUT ELEK; 399,68 V. OUT ELEV,: 391.55 LOT 21 ~ Q Z ~?N Q
FlRE HYDRANT LOT 23 LOT 10 Q ~ ~ _ ~ a W 0 ~ a' E
w/ GATE vALVE STk 23+87,50 FIRE HYDRANT U W ~ 0 ~ m . ~~a LOT 12 ? ooW °
OFFSET: 18,00 L W/ CA1E VALVE STk 10+94.16 Um
8" PLUG OFFSET: 15,00 L . • . • z ~ ~ o
LOT 20 W ~ x >
1 LOT 34 8 ' FIRE HYDRANT
~ S W/ GATE VALVE ' STA: 20+08.53
~ ~ LOT 31 a, ~ ~1 OFFSET: 21.00 R
~ MH 1s + LOT 19 'A
N srk 22+31,50 MH 17 LOT 24 0, o OFFSET: 3,00 R r MH 11 r r 1s e o
6o STA; 0+00 STk 1+8&02 ~ STk 5+82,22 ~1 RIM ELEV.: 400,83 RIM ELEV,: 398,38 a STk 4+61.83 V 5+s2s2 ~ , $ LOT 9
INV. IN ELEV. 394,93 INV. IN ELEV.: 390.48 4+61.83 ~ ~ LOT 13 ~ LEV.: 3511.ae '
INY. OUT ELEV.: 394.83 INV, WT ELEV,: 390,38 RIM ELEV,: 35&89 - CB 12 INV. IN ELEV.: 353.82 N ELEV.: 353.82 . • °D N ELEV.: 353.82
18&02' OF 8' SS 01,796 STk 13+33,03 INV, IN ELEV.: 353.82 LOT 35 ~1 OFFSET; 12 0o R INV, our ELEV.: 353.72 XJT ELEV.: 353.72 . 0
~ PROPOSED 30' qTY TOC ELEV: 374,91 / - LOT 25 24' RCP - e. OF DURHAM SANITARY INV. IN ELEV; 38a31 .
S~ SEWER EASEMENT INV. IN ELEV; 388,05 57,78 LF - N PT ¦ 22+09.51 0 INV. OUT ELEW 381,08 01,00%
`~0~ FES 11 g / ELE 380,50 ~ 11 / w •
;,380.50 N~, BEGIN PROPOSED ' ' ' ' MH 4 LOT 8
LOT 30 151,00' ~ B" ~ o a7zx eEaN PROPOSE ~ 0 7.482 30g,OB OF 8" 30' aTY dF DU FES 11 SANITARY SEWE 30' aTr aF DURHAM . srk n+n.o3 SANITARY SEWER tP, • • ~ • OFFSET: 2.09 R
ELEV: 388, PROPOSED EASEMENT MH 18 \ ~ i ' TY STORM EASEMENT STk 0+00 SED RIM ELEV.: 350.58
CB 2 " STA: 21+ta03 STA; 2+BO,83 / p/ROpO~p 15' RCP DRANAGE Y STORM 0 3.42 INV. IN ELEV.: 343.89
15 RCP OFFSET; 13,00 R RIM ELEV.: 392,59 MH 19 18' qTY STORM 22.50 LF EASEMENT EX, MH 28 LF TOC ELEV! 397,22 INV. IN ELEK; 385,89 DRAINAGE 0 2.OOX o STk 8' EX. MH 12 C ~ INV. IN ELEV.: 343.89 ]VT .'.'PRQP,OSEff • INV. OUT ELEV.: 343.79 PROP05ED 30' CITY OF STA: 8+57.48 ~ • .'.',2q',CF1Y STORM..'.'.' .
CB 1 01,00% INV, IN ELEM. 391,79 INV. OUT ELEK: 385,59 STA: 4+11,83 ~ RIM ELE LOT 36 STk 21+iQ03 NV, WT ELEV; 391,89 RIM ELEV,: 381.32 EASEMENT ~ INV, IN RIM ELEV.; 38288 DURHAM SANITARY ~ . '.".P8?E•28 ..'.DRAINAGE EASENENT•~ SEWER EASEMENT 18 INV. IN ELEV.; 353.34 e~, STk •17*#250.' ' ' -
OFFSET, 13,00 L INV, IN ELEV,; 374,32 ~ LOT 18 INV, OU TOC ELEk 397.22 DRS Mu4 ~ 371,32 LOT 26 m 8 INV. OUT EIEV,: 353.14 .......'j2"~ RCP'.=y'43:$1.'Lf•.0 0:5071 g ~ 82+92.24 Q . •IRV,'IN'EIEV;'.334.74' RIM ELEV.: 380.35
INV, OUT ELEV: 39205 'i CB 10 ~ 9 STk 14+03.41 ~ STA: 14+03.41 .'.INV..'OUT ELEV) 334.00.'. INV. OUT ELEV.: 345.45 13.41 ~1' ~ S 292.24 OF B' DIP SS 0 0.5071 INV. OUT EIEV.; 345.35
~E ~ OFFSET: 1200 R OFFSET: 12,00 L ,p. TOC ELEV; 373,87 ~ may; 373.87 x.00 L •GG~23•'..'.'. , , • ' - 373.67 0 $Tk .11fa3:41 ~ -
~C,b LOT 29 INV. IouT~ELEV~388.97 0 INV. OUT ELEY: 369.31 IEV; 369.31 p •OFFSET:.13.60•L PROPOSED 20' CITY TtIC,EIEVi•350.4fl'...' STORM DRAINAGE
~jo 18' qTY STORM h 15" RCP EX. MH 13 V:•OUT.ELEY:.'348r25 EASEMENT
MH 20 ~ DRAINAGE EASEMENT LOT 28 LOT 27 q3 g 24,00 LF STA; 7+85.14 ' . • RIM ELEV.: 38ae7 LOT
sTk o+oo LOT 37 ~ 3 STk 14+99.73 ~ o''00x RIM ELEV. 394,89 INV• IN ELEV.: 352.27 ~ ' INV• OUT ELEV.; 35224 15 RCP ~ , ~ 27.00 Lf a .
INV, OUT ELEV.: 388.89 0~ STk 19+34,85 TOCTOC ELEV2378,99 N FlRE HYDRANT TOC ELEV:~391.74 INV. IN ELEV; 371.88 h ?B 0 LODX 0
W/ VALVE INV, IN ELEV: 388.58 ~ INV. OUT ELEY: 371,7 $ STk 20+23.72 ~ INV, OUT ELEV: 388.48 q3 7 ,off q, 25 '35.o0•L~.......'.'.'.'.'.' . . t^~i e. ~ ELEV: 340. 0 20Gx.'.'.'.......'.'.'.'
OFFSET: 18.00 L ~ STA: 18+18,53 ~
~ ~ OFFSET; 13.00 R Oy LOT 1 8.00 LF ? ~ TOC ELEN 381.59 W`~ 17 ~ PROPOSED ~ . LOT , o ~ 1e' aTY sraRM , 6Tk.1~~+33.4x.'.'.'.. • . H DRAINAGE ..OFF`6ET:'.13.50'1'.....'.'.'.'.'.'.' .
01.ODX ~ INK IOUT~ELEV: 377.34 MH 3 ~ r~ EASEMENT TOC.ELEN'.3'30.48 • , sTA; 1e+26.93 w' .'.~.IN.k~.E~?. 3~.9a'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.~.'.. LOT 6
~ ! ~ 15' RCP ' LOT 14 oFFSEr a12 L INV.,OUT •d.EV:. 34a?Q'.'.'.'.' ' . STA; 9+14.28 8"X 8' . .
OO F 28.00 LF ,6 a 0 1.0070 FlRE HYDRANT RIM ELEV.: 352.23 . ' INV. IN ELEV.: 343.05 7 b' '4" ~ I ~ •
LOT 39 , X B w/ GATE VALVE INV. IN ELEV.: 343.05 ~ 8"CV ' , • ' INV. OUT ELEV.: 342.9 ~ ,p~ ' . ' ' PIPE 28
~ ~ STk 15+81.19 LOT 40 ce 4 s'c'' oFt:sEr; 15.00 L ~b '.'.'FIRE HYDhANT~.;.. , , • M" ~p ~
soTF~ri3~ L 17 00 6h LOT 16 TOC ELEV: 391.74 xA~' ? 9~ 4B LF 0 O.SOX ~ G1•~19N7•E INV. IN ELEV: 32&24 4
0 INV. IN ELEV: J88.22 ? ~ti INV. WT ELEY: 375.58 PS LOT 15 `D' ~•~OFFSEi:'18. ~L•••'.. INV. OUT ELEW 32&00 ~ o a
CB 8 ~ FKtE HYDRANT 0
LOT 41 STk 16+1&53 4 PROPOSED 30' aTY aF i OFFSET: 13.00 L MH 2 w/ cAiE vurE Q six 15+3a9e \ i
DURHAM SANTARY TOC ELEV: 381.59 11+4.06 R ~ INV. OUT FLEW 317,70 y, 1 OFFSET: 21.00 R
„h 1 ? RIB 9.fV.: 371,26 i' i LOT 5
MH 2t ~ 5 PROPOSED ib' aTY LOT 42 y~ INK 1X77 ELEV.: 364,28 sTk 2+4e.oo ELEW 373,00 sraw DRAINACE LOT 43 ~ c~ 14 CB 14 . /1S~'"~ .
RIM ELEK: 393,51 EASEMENT STA: 10 INV, IN ELEK: 375.61 OFFSET: STA: 10+39.50 ~ ~ V~ E 1'53 \ ~ ~ ~ • OFFSET: 13.00 R a ~`.a£ pG ~ .y;11 1 . .
INV, OUT ELEK: 375,51 ~ TOC ELE TOC ELEV: 382.88 i ~1'~' 11x5 ~ ' • '
~ INK OU1 s~ PROPOSED 30' dTY 4~ ~ ~ INV• OUT ELEV: 358.25 ~ E7L MH 14 ~ ' . s~ STk 10+98.12 P'1 \ ~ . ~ ~ OFFSET: 0.02 R
- 33Q73' MH 22 OF DURHAM SANITARY ~ 15 RCP ~ STk 10+11.62 1 a 6'X 2' ' . • . MH 7 26.00 LF • ~ ~ RIM EIEV.: 348.86 Q~ ~ STk 8+01.64
~ b" ~ 0 4.19% STk 5+98.73 SENER EASEMENT ~ RIM ELEK: 387,72 ~ 01.00>< ~ INV. 9i ELEV.: 339.79 C9 2t'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'..•.....'.'.'.' RIM ELEV.: 351.00 1111111 INV. IN ELEV.: 339.78 • •'•'.STA:'.12+'3x83• INV, OUT ELEV.: 347.00 \\111111 l~~~l//
G G INK N1 ELEV.: 380.82 Qf+ CB 15 ~ - G G 91v, ouT ELEV.: 360.72 LOT 44 soTF~r +ao~R INV. WT ELEV.: 339.88 ~ .'.'.TOC.EL~M •346,21..'.'.'.. , ~ /i~
\ Toc ELEV: 36288 / .'N1V:OUTELEV:.'341,1¢, PROPOSED ~ ' ~i / E A.~14+07.87 ' ' • 20' ACCESS , • //J/ ~~i
G ? INK OUT ELEM~357.89 OFFSET; 4.13 R $0:98 lF.'.' ' ' . EASEMENT •9 NEW RIM ELEV,; 36298 ~T 2 . e roo7c.' ~ .
/ INV• IN ELEV,; 341.43 SEAL INV, OUT ELEV.: 341.39 2~WATER PROPbSED'.16'.'p,T1' ' ~
G ~ e' LOT 45 • • ' ' W ~ 0\ MH 23 15' RCP / 4 CB 18 31,47 LF ETER \ \ : ~ 15456 ~ ' FES22 ~•stoRM.DRMNACE, >
' ' ~ ~ STk 8+69.01 STA: 2+25,00 STk 12+63,61 0 7.5071 OFFSET: 17.50 L / \ ELEV: .7y ,EASEMENi,•, ' LOT 4 RPZ eACaFLOw ~ 1 ' l• / PREVEN110N ~ \ 2• p,K ~ ~.t11'6+~' V~~
RIM ELEV,; 354.83 / C ~ INV. IN ELEV,: 347,93 ~ ELEK 380~~ / ASSEMBLY \ ~ 1 ~~iS II' 8'GV , ; STUB • W 11~`
' W INV. IN ELEV,: 347,93 I ELE / INK OUT ELEV.; 347. INK OUT DFV: 355.43 / /
/ / ~ STA: 10+93.47 15" RCP / / \ EX.
/ w OFFSET; 17,50 L 170.15 IF / ~ ~ ~ TOC ELEN 353.15 / ~ / 0 4.5071 / LOT 3 \ Ga1. ,
\ \ ~ / / ~ ~ INV, IN ELEV: 347,89 ~ Ca i ! I~T ~ ~ r 2" COPPER 1 ' _ PORTABLE \ ` m
W Jl INK OUT ELEV: 347.59 ~ ? e• FES 17 / ~ X MH 1 WATERLINE 1 ,c . . • ~ X MH 1 > . ' ,
G ~ J' ELEV; 34&00 ~ Sik 10+84.87 ~ ~ ~ a ~ ~ STA. 10+84.87 EX. MH 14 ~ Y. OFFSET: 0.33 R RIM ELEV.: 340.84 ' . .
~ 1 0 42 RCP ~ OFFSET+0,33R 30.88 LF F / STa 9 8a 8 ~ ~ !y . 0 toot ~ / ~ NEw RIM ELEV.: 3a STk 9+88.18 P INV. IN ELEK: 338.53 EXISTING " ' NEW RIM ELEV.: 353.00 INV. OUT ELEV.: 33&46 PUMP . '
1' A// INV. IN ELEV.: 343.; INV. IN ELEK: 343. INV. IN ELEV.: 343.28 STA110N ~ 3 INV. IN ELEV.: 343.45 ' LJ
~A C~ dj/ INV. WT ELEV,; 34 1Po GV ~ ~ C8 191 47 INV. OUT ELEV.: 343.25 ~ Z W
,A ~ s a o+93, ~~V ~ 42' RCP OFFSET: 17.50 R q O 0' GR
t;' s ~ 35,00 LF TOC ELEV: 353.15 ~ 1 ~ ippX INV. IN ELEV: 347,24 53.15 a }
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 0 INK OUT ELEV: 342,78 X278 TOT LOT ~ ~ LOT 1 N Z
~ ~ C~ Q 42" RCP 0 9d ~ ~ 7' 2&01 LF \ N W Z o
\j~y, 8"GY Fl HYDRANT 01.00% .1`+ RE SYMBOL LEGEND NOTES ~ ~ ~ FES 20 0 ~ w
0 W/ GATE VALVE ELEK 34250 NOTE "A" ~ sTk 1o+Bao3 N ~ ~ a
FIRE HYDRANT ALL CONSTRUCTION SHALL CONFORM TO THE ~ OFFSET: 21,40 F ~ ~
- WATER METER LATEST CITY OF DURHAM STANDARDS. As ws ~ , W
WATER TEE NOTE "8" F r
STATE WATER AND/OR SEWER PERMITS ARE N \
g GV -WATER GATE VALVE REQUIRED. THE CITY OF DURHAM ENGINEERING • DEPARTMENT SHALL REVIEW AND APPROVE THE ~ ~ 4 N 0 ~
Q MH -SEWER MANHOLE CONSTRUCTION DRAWINGS PRIOR TO SUBMITTING
THEM TO THE STATE FOR APPROVAL. ® PUMP STATION o: W
SS -SEWER CLEANOUT , ~ m
z
¦ CB -CATCH BASIN DATE: 8101101
¦ YI -YARD INLET ~ JOB NO: 00208
DRAWING: 00-208
DESIGNED: ~WP
DRAwN: LMH
i
CHECKED:
HORIZONTAL SCALE:
1"=60'
VERTICAL SCALE: NA
4HFFT Nn
SCALE 1" = 60'
60' 0 60' 120'
OF 5
i