20001429 Ver 1_COMPLETE FILE_20001118

N1ATF Michael F. Easley, Governor
0 9 William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
\O? QG North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
7 Gregory J. Thorpe, Ph.D.
Acting Director
O Division of Water Quality
C13
March 5, 2002
CERTIFIED MAIL- RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Ms Gina Razete
CGR Development Corporation
3000 Carefree Blvd.
Fort Myers, FL 33917
Re: Carefree Cove
DW Q # 001429
Ashe and Watauga Counties
Dear Ms. Razete:
On January 30, 2001, the Division of Water Quality wrote to you concerning your plans to impact 2100 ft of
stream ( UT Wallace Branch) in Ashe and Watauga County. This letter informed you that the project was incomplete and
was being placed on hold until the additional information outlined in the letter was supplied. To date, we have not
received this additional information. Unless we hear from you in writing within 3 weeks of the receipt of this letter, we will
consider that you no longer want to pursue this project and we will retire the file and consider the application as
withdrawn. Please be aware that reapplication for this project will require a Certification fee and new applications.
Please call Mr. Mike Horan of my staff at 919-733-3574 if you would like to discuss this matter.
Sincerely yours, per,
i? John Dorney
Wetlands/401 Unit Supervisor
Cc: File copy
Central files
Winston Salem DWQ Regional Office
Raleigh and Wilmington Field Office US Army Corps of Engineers
. X17
NCDENR
N. C. Division of Water Quality 1617 Mail Service Center _ Raleigh, NC 27699-1617 [phone] Customer Service
1 800 623-7748
ve, 00 1429, ashe and watauga counties
loft
Subject: carefree cove, 001429, ashe and watauga counties
Date: Fri, 02 Feb 200108:46:48 -0500
From: Jennifer Frye <[e-mail]>
Organization: NC DENR Water Quality
To: "cyndi.karoly" <[e-mail]>
Hey Cyndi,
Hope you are doing well -
Attached is a letter that I sent out this week (we spoke briefly about
this on Tuesday). This is a Chris Huysman project - basically, they
want the cert. prior to submitting a plan ...this letter is telling them
no way.
Call me if you have any questions.
Ciao!
Jen
Jennifer Serafin Frye
Division of Water Quality
NC Department of Environment
Winston-Salem Regional Office
Winston-Salem, NC 27107
Voice: 336-771-4608 ext. 275
f [jcarefreecovejan30'.d
E
and Natural Resources
Fax: [phone]
Name: carefreecovej an30'. doe
Type: Microsoft Word Document (application/msword)
Encoding: base64
Download Status: Not downloaded with message

2/2/019:45 AN
Division of Water Quality
January 30, 2001
Certified Mail: 7099 3220 0006 8502 5202
Return Receipt Requested
Ms. Gina Razete
CGR Development Corporation
3000 Carefree Boulevard
Fort Myers, FL 33917
SUBJECT: Carefree Cove
DWQ Project # 00 1429
Ashe and Watauga Counties
Dear Ms. Razette:
This Office is in receipt of information, supplied by Mr. Chris Huysman, Wetland and
Natural Resource Consultants, Inc., which refers to a quoted design, permitting, construction
management, and monitoring fee for the subject stream restoration plan. While it is
understandable that the costs for stream restoration are considerable, the Division cannot
determine, based on the information submitted, that the project meets our definition of stream
restoration. Stream restoration is defined as the process of converting an unstable, altered, or
degraded stream corridor, including adjacent riparian zone and flood-prone areas to its natural or
referenced, stable conditions considering recent and future watershed conditions. This process
also includes restoring the geomorphic dimension, pattern and profile as well as biological and
chemical integrity, including transport of water and sediment produced by the stream's
watershed in order to achieve dynamic equilibrium.
Simply stated, a detailed stream restoration plan must be submitted to and approved by
the Division prior to the issuance of a Section 401 Water Quality Certification for stream
restoration. Please respond both to this Office and to John Dorney, 4401 Reedy Creek Rd,
Raleigh, NC 27607 within three weeks of receipt of this letter outlining your intent to proceed
with this project or withdraw your application. Once the project is withdrawn, you are welcome
to re-apply if and when you reach the decision to pursue this stream restoration.
00 1429
Page 2
If you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact Mrs. Jennifer Frye or me
at [phone].
Sincerely,
Larry D. Coble
WQ Regional Supervisor
cc: Mr. Chris Huysman, Wetland and Natural Resources Consultants, Inc.
Raleigh Field Office, US Army Corps of Engineers
Wilmington Office, US Army Corps of Engineers
Wetlands/401 Unit Central Office
Central Files
WSRO
December 19, 2000
Certified Mail: 7099 3220 0006 8502 5189
Return Receipt Requested
Ms. Gina Razete
CGR Development Corporation
3000 Carefree Boulevard
Fort Myers, FL 33917
SUBJECT: Carefree Cove
DWQ Project # 001429
Ashe and Watauga Counties
Dear Ms. Razette:
On November 14, 2000, this Office sent a written request to you for additional
information for the proposed activities at the subject property. To date, we have not
received this required information and will continue to place your project on hold.
Please notify this Office, in writing, if you wish to continue this project or
withdraw your application. We are requesting (by copy of this letter) that the U.S.
Army Corps of Engineers continue to place your project on administrative hold.
If you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact Mrs. Jennifer
Frye or me at [phone].
Sincerely,
Larry D. Coble
WQ Regional Supervisor
cc: Mr. Chris Huysman, Wetland and Natural Resources Consultants, Inc.
Raleigh Field Office, US Army Corps of Engineers
Wilmington Office, US Army Corps of Engineers
Wetlands/401 Unit Central Office
Central Files
WSRO
Wetlands Tracking Projects
- Print
Facility Name Carefree Cove c/o CGR Development - NW 27 I County Ashe
Project Number 00 1429 County2 Watauga
Q Inactive Region Winston-Sale
Project Type ;pit.-pose of road cross ings/restoration(I SEE ALSO 001332)) DCM Office
Location UT Wallace Branch COE Office Raleigh
Last
401s Recvd Sent to Recvd Action
Recvd From Date Region Region Date Last Action
App I Q48-2000 10-19-2(9)0 ' ..fNIU 11-6-200011/13120(N) Hold
`
Total for Project:
Inspections/ Violations
IncnArtinn hate In-nPrtr)r
Total Total Total
401 401 Total Mit ` Mit
Acres Feet Acres Feet
, 401
(':mmnliant I attar Tvna Data ',ant RanIV Data Currant St
0 Y 0 `? t° .. ? Inspect.
? s
Subject: Carefree Cove, 001332, Ashe & Watauga Co.
Date: Mon, 06 Nov 2000 09:59:37 -0500
From: Jennifer Frye <[e-mail]>
Organization: NC DENR Water Quality
To: "cyndi.karoly" <[e-mail]>
Staff report completed for 00 1332. Comments: I am recommending that
the NWP 14 portion of the project be issued and the NWP 27 be given a
separate #?and put on hold. I was unsure as to whether or not to write
the on hold letter (I didn't). If the restoration is assigned a
separate project number, then will the initial review (and hence the
request for more info), start with the CO? We can talk about this later
this week.
Jen
Jennifer Serafin Frye
Division of Water Quality
NC Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Winston-Salem Regional Office
Winston-Salem, NC 27107
Voice: 336-771-4608 ext. 275 Fax: [phone]
vly?l

1 1 /C /AA 1.11 1
....1V1%JrIM114 vvm
TO: John Dorney Regional Contact:
Non-Discharge Branch WQ Supervisor:
Date:
SUBJECT: WETLAND STAFF REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS
Facility Name Carefree Cove c% CGR Development
Project Number 00 1332
Recvd From APP
Received Date 10/18/00 Recvd By Region 10/24/2000
Project Type road crossings, restoration
Certificates
Permit Wetland Wetland Wetland Stream
Type Type Impact Score Index
County Ashe
County2 Watauga
Region Winston-Salem
Stream
Class Acres Feet
Prim. Supp. Basin Req. Req.
F14 Stream r 7y O N F__ 10-2-7-2 ?- TR+ 50,702. 0.09 140.00
F 27 Stream PT-@-
Y O N F- F_F__F__7r__F_- 2,100.00
Mitigation Wetland
MitigationType Type Acres Feet

Is Wetland Rating Sheet Attached? O Y (ON Did you request more info? *Y ON
Have Project Changes/Conditions Been Discussed With Applicant? Q Y O N
Is Mitigation required? O Y (0 N Recommendation: O Issue * Issue/fond O Deny
Provided by Region: Latitude (ddmmss) 362328 Longitude (ddmmss) 814311
Comments:
They have also requested certific ation for appx 2100 L F of stre am restoration (NWP27). This is
not currently associated with com pensatory mitigation; howeve r, this office has been told by the
consultant that the restoration e ject mavt[?4 to be "so ld" as m ation credits to an outside
iti
)mpacter (DOT?) Recommend that the restoration portion g
of the eject be assigned a
separate WO # and placed on h old pending plans a nd spec ifications (copies to RO and CO) for
DV approval. It is recommen ded that they follow the Div ision's Draft Technical Guide for
Stream Work in IVY' when deswa n*na their restoratio n plan,
cc: Regional Office
Central Office Page Number 1
Facility Name Carefree Cove c% CGR Development County Ashe
Project Number 00 1332 Regional Contact:
Date:
Comments (continued from page 1):
cc: Regional Office
Central Office
Jennifer Frye
11/6/2000
Page Number 2

November 14, 2000
Certified Mail 7099 3220 0006 8502 5134
Return Receipt Reauested
Ms. Gina Razete
CGR Development Corporation
3000 Carefree Boulevard
Fort Myers, FL 33917
SUBJECT: Request for Additional Information
Carefree Cove
DWQ Project #00 1429
Ashe and Watauga Counties
Dear Ms. Razete:
The Division of Water Quality has reviewed your plans for the restoration of
approximately 2100 linear feet of an Unnamed Tributary to Wallace Creek, Class C Tr+
waters, New River Basin. Insufficient evidence is present in our files to conclude that your
project must be built as planned in waters and/or wetlands in accordance with 15A NCAC 2H
.0506. Therefore, unless modifications of the proposal are made as described below, we will
have to move toward denial of your 401 Certification as required by 15A NCAC 2H.0507(e)
and will place this project on hold as incomplete until we receive this additional information.
We are requesting (by copy of this letter) that the U. S. Army Corps of Engineers place your
project on administrative hold.
Please submit detailed plans and specifications for the stream channel restoration. It is
recommended that you utilize the Division's Draft Technical Guide for Stream Work in North
Carolina as guidance when designing the restoration plan. Copies of this document may be
obtained through the Wetland Unit homepage at http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands.
Please respond within three weeks of the date of this letter by sending one copy
of this information to me and one copy to John R. Dorney, 4401 Reedy Creek Road,
Raleigh, NC 27607. If we do not hear from you in three weeks, we will assume that you no
longer want to pursue this project and we will consider the project as withdrawn. If you have
any questions regarding this matter, please contact Mrs. Jennifer Frye or me at (336) 771-
4600.
Sincerely,
Larry D. Coble
WQ Regional Supervisor
Carefree Cove
Page 2
cc: Mr. Chris Huysman, Wetland and Natural Resource Consultants, Inc.
Raleigh Field Office, US Army Corps of Engineers
Wilmington Office, US Army Corps of Engineers
Wetlands/401 Unit Central Office
Central Files
WSRO

NATIONWIDE PERMIT REQUESTED: # 27
PRE-CONSTRUCTION NOTIFICATION APPLICATION
1. Owners Name: CGR Development Corporation
Contact: Ms. Gina Razete
2. Mailing Address: 3000 Carefree Boulevard
Fort Myers, FL 33917
subdivision name: Carefree Cove
Project location address, including subdivision name (if different from mailing address above): Carefree Cove,
Baldwin Gap, Ashe Countv/Watau2a County. North Carolina
3. Telephone number (home): (work): 941-731-3000
4. Agent: Wetland and Natural Resource Consultants, Inc.
720 South Main Ave.
Newton, North Carolina 28658
Phone: [phone] - Fax: [phone]
5. Location of work:
County: Ashe/Watauga
Nearest town or city: Trade, TN
Specific location: Adiacent to TN 67/NC 88 (see attached USGS TopoQuad as site vicinity map)
6. Impacted or nearest stream / river: Unnamed Tributary to Wallace Branch
River Basin: New River Basin
7a. Is project located near water classified as trout, tidal saltwater (SA), high
quality waters (HQW), outstanding resource waters (ORW), water supply (WS-I
or WS-2)? Yes ? No ® If yes, explain:
7b. Is the project is located within a North Carolina Division of Coastal Management Area of Environmental
Concern (EAC)? Yes ? No
7c. If the project is located within a coastal county, what is the land use plan designation (LUP): n/a
8a. Have any Section 404 permits been previously requested for use on this property? Yes ? No ® If
yes, provide Acton I.D. number of previous permit and any additional information (include photocopy of 401
Certification):
8b. Are additional permit requests expected for this property in the future?
Yes ? No ® If yes, describe anticipated work:
9a. Estimated total number of acres in tract of land: 165.63 ac.
9b. Estimated total acres of wetlands located on project site: 1.26 ac.
I Oa. Number of acres of wetlands impacted by the proposed project:
Filling: ac Excavation: ac
Flooding: ac Other-. 0.24 (channel restoration) ac
Drainage: ac Total acres to be impacted: 0.24 (channel, 2100 linear
feet in length and 5 linear feet in width) ac
IOb. (1) Stream channel to be impacted by the proposed project (if relocated, provide distance both before and
after relocation):
Length before: 2000 if Length after: 21001f
Width before: 5 ft Width after: 5 ft
(based on normal high water contours)
Average depth before: 0.2 ft Average depth after: 0.2-0.5 ft
(2) Stream channel impacts will result from:
Open channel relocation ? Placement of pipe in channel ?
Channel elevation ? Construction of a dam/flooding ?
Other: Stream Restoration
11. If construction of a pond is proposed, what is the size of the watershed draining to the pond? n/a ac
What is the expected pond surface area? ac
12. Description of proposed work including discussion of type of mechanical equipment to be used (attach plans: 8
''/s" x 11" drawings only): Restoration of stream bed that has moved over time into an adjacent road bed.
Current channel has failing banks and a lack of substantial cobble substrate uresent within historic channel bed.
13. Purpose of proposed work: To restore stream to historic location.
14. State reasons why it is believed that this activity must be carried out in wetlands. (include any measures taken
to minimize wetland impacts): The restored channel will be constructed with the following attributes: stable
banks at a 2:1 side slope ratio more sinuosity than current reach, better substrate, and better aquatic wildlife
habitat (areas of deeper pools will be constructed in hopes of re-establishing trout populations).
15. You are required to contact the State Historic Preservation Officer (SHPO) regardig the presence of historic
properties in the permit area which may be affected by the proposed project. Date contacted: To be completed
by the USACOE.
16. Does the project involve an expenditure of public funds or the use of public (State) land? Yes ? No $?
(if no, go to 18)
a. If yes, does the project require preparation of an environmental document pursant to the requirements of the
North Carolina Environmental Policy Act?
Yes ? No ?
b. If yes, has the document been reviewed through the North Carolina Department of Administration State
Clearinghouse? Yes ? No ?
If answer to 16b. is yes, then submit appropriate documentation from the State Clearinghouse to Division of
Environmental Management regarding compliance with the North Carolina Environmental Policy Act.
17. The following items should be included with this application if proposed activity involves discharge of
excavated or fill material into wetlands:
a. Wetland delineation map showing all wetlands, streams, lakes and ponds on the property (for Nationwide
Permit numbers 14, 18, 21, 26, 29, and 38). All streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property must
be shown on the map. Map scales should be 1 inch equals 50 fleet or 1 inch equals 100 feet or their
equivalent.
b. If available, representative photograph of wetlands to be impacted by project.
c. If delineation was performed by a consultant, include all data sheets relevant to the placement of the
delineation line.
d. Attach a copy of the stormwater management plan if required.
e. What is the land use of surrounding property? Mostly agricultural.
f. If applicable, what is proposed method of sewage disposal? on site septic systems
g. Signed and dated by agent authorization letter, if applicable.
Note: wetlands or waters of the U.S. may not be impacted prior to:
1) Issuance of a section 404 Corps of Engineers permit, and
2) Either the issuance or waiver of a 401 Division of Environmental Management (Water Quality)
Certification.
tai tlnnnc qr 1 I Se - O'J
Owner's / Agent's signaturd3 Q1- Date
Wetland and
Natural Resource
Consultants, Inc.
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Raleigh Regulatory Field Office
Attn: Mr. John Thomas
6508 Falls of the Neuse Road, Suite 120
Raleigh, North Carolina 27615
0C 133'1
PAYMENT
RECEIVED
October 5, 2000
N.C. Division of Water Quality
Attn: Mr. John Domey
4401 Reedy Creek Road
Raleigh, North Carolina 27606
Re: Section 404 Permit / 401 Water Quality Certification Request
CGR Development Corporation / Carefree Cove
Baldwin Gap, Ashe/Watauga County, North Carolina
Dear Mr. Thomas and Mr. Dorney:
On behalf of CGR Development Corporation, WNR, Inc. requests authorization for
proposed impacts to jurisdictional Waters of the U.S. for their proposed Carefree Cove
Development located in Baldwin Gap, NC. The attached USGS Topo Quad depicts the
location of the site. In its current state the site contains some 3000 linear feet of
unnamed tributaries to Wallace Branch and 1+ acres of vegetated wetlands.
The on-site channel proposed for impacts is assessed to be a moderately high quality
channel with average peaks in its hydrograph resulting from the approximate 150-acre
rural drainage area. The channel does show on the USGS Topo Quad. Down-cutting
and bank failure is evident along several reaches of the channel. The channel has also
relocated itself in several areas into an adjacent historic roadbed, which is at a higher
elevation than the historic channel bed. There is better substrate in the historic channel
bed. Crayfish and salamanders inhabit the channel throughout its length.
Ephemeroptera, Plecoptera, and Tricoptera were all observed during the initial wetland
field evaluations in June.
Site development requires piping impacts of 140 linear feet of this DWQ important
channel under a Nationwide Permit 14. The entire reach of this channel was flowing
during June 2000. There are numerous springheads further up the drain within the
property limits that provide the hydrology for this feature.
Site development requires impacts to 0.09 acres of vegetated wetlands under
Nationwide Permit 14. The total wetland impacts for the site will be 0.11 acres, which
represents the area of wetlands and of channels (waters) impacted by the development.
Wetland impacts of 0.06 acres will be needed for the construction of Road Crossing #2
82&"312,1,9207 Chris 720 South Main Ave.
828,-312-9205 Jennifer Newton, NC 28658
828312."9206 Tamp 828-465-3050 Fax
utilizing Nationwide Permit 14 while 0.03 acres of wetland impacts will also be permitted
under Nationwide Permit 14 for the construction of Road Crossing #3.
Avoidance was achieved by a layout that consists of 95 lots on the 165-acre tract of
land. If permitted, the net wetland and waters loss would be approximately 4.7% of
channel length and approximately 9% of vegetated wetland area. Channel impacts are
high in the drainage area. As a point of interest, the channel on site is at the top of the
drainage area for Wallace Branch. With the exception of road crossings in the
headwaters all other wetlands are avoided by the proposed development. The slope of
existing topography dictated road layout that could more easily cross the steep drainage
feature.
Wetlands located at the top of the drainage at an elevation of 3700 feet are important
for water storage and biological diversity. These wetlands are wooded with a diverse
stable canopy and are not proposed for extensive impacts.
The mitigative proposal is that all remaining wetlands and channels on the site will be
protected by a deed mechanism similar to the state recommended format. Also
included within this package is a Nationwide Permit 27 application to restore
approximately 2100 linear feet of the channel on site. Aforementioned conditions make
this channel attractive for restoration. The location of the channel, at the top of the
drainage area for Wallace Branch, also makes the proposal for restoration attractive.
Once this section of the drainage is restored, there may be downstream possibilities for
channel reaches currently in pastured land.
Please call with any questions or concerns that you may have.
Sincerely,
Aa.
61-
Chris Huysman
Copies Furnished To:
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Ashe Regulatory Feld Office
Attn: Mr. Steve Chapin
151 Patton Avenue, Room 143
Asheville, North Carolina 28801-5006
CGR Development
Attn: Ms. Gina Razete
3000 Carefree Blvd
Fort Myers, Florida 33917
W
?
N

a
_ c " y /-?f .(( Lam/ '. ?• ' ?,, `' / `? ;
\. l ?v ?i r(R Z
;kr
O / ?l ` \\ ?`; Q t
t _.'?- ,? ?. - - - ,?,,?,?\ - -_ Jam. ._? ?-,?\' ??? ?'-; /t C?1 1? ;1,:?. i'.? I.? :?, ,!' /`? ? ? -..?` ,
rm,
10.
??Ya+ ace ifl%/l, ?' ?? \ ~?1?? `? _\ - - ;1'?_ ?,? •?
?ca
1 ,r. ?j'? . } 11 Q 7t+amss Gam : .r
44
Z;6
fit
6' W
"I n MY w 681- 43 0.00" 61- 47 0.00" I -w
Name: BALDWIN GAP Location: 036° 23'27.6" N 0810 43' 112' W
Date: 1015/100 Caption: CGR DEVELOPMENT
Scale: 1 inch equals 2000 feet Carefree Cove, Ashe Co., NC
WNR, Inc. Job # CGR-1000
Copyright (0) 1997, Meptech, Inc.
i '
-• ~-?
%
% -
l S 1 _
:IL
t?j ?S `fit ! ,}? 4• °
}1Fr? ?1 ,; ? •'ti ? Q
10
z
'lam ?6- r,F 'My°/ rLJ+j t ` s / ti
000
Z
? r
Z.c r L s+a ( r 1
CU-
%
r 10?
Z -`? icy ' ° F + ! }? z
' •' (< ? f ref ( ? ,, '?? ? , ?t M
•W
1 ') z
'3
081° 1 0. I I I 0
Name: BALDWIN GAP Location: 036° 23' 27.6" N 081° 43' 11.7' W
Date: 10/51100 Caption: CGR DEVELOPMENT
Scale: 1 inch equals 666 feet Carefree Cove, Ashe Co., NC
WNR, Inc. Job # CGR-1000
Copyright (C) 1997, %Uptech, Inc
CAREFREE COVE, BALDWIN GAP
ASHE/WATAUGA COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
WNR, Inc Project # CGR-1000-CarefreeCove
IMPACT DATA TABLE

STREAM RESTORATION: 2100 linear feet (0.23 acres) of perennial, important
channel
(Mitigation Credits Anticipated)
NATIONWIDE 14 IMPACTS
ROAD CROSSING #1: 80 linear feet (0.01 acres) of fill in perennial, important
channel
(No Mitigation Anticipated)
ROAD CROSSING #2: 60 linear feet (0.01 acres) of fill in perennial, important
channel
(No Mitigation Anticipated)
0.06 acres of fill in vegetated wetiands
(45 linear feet long, 60 linear feet for road width)
(No Mitigation Anticipated)
ROAD CROSSING #3: 0.03 acres of fill in vegetated wedands
(25 linear feet long, 60 linear feet for road width)
(No Mitigation Anticipated)
??/ / / / ??,\ 111 1 \ II.• I II f/ ?\ \ ? / ?
NW 27
Stream Restoration 1 1111 I I I I I / ` \ \ \ \ -
2100 linear feet of channel impact I 1I I I I I / \ \ - _ -
- (currently approx. 2000 linear feet) I ' Ilt Itl II II I' I I ?? \ \ -
\\ \\ \\\\ \ \ \r.l 1 tt I I I it I \\\ \\?
=1?y; ?? \\\\\\\\\\?\\\\\ ? ? III tii I I ? ? ?! f If /\`?\ \\\ -
?t? ?\ \\\\\\\ so \? NW 14 \
Road Crossing #1 .?° ?\\`' \? \\\ \ \\ \\ \ \ 80 linear feet of channel impact /
(65 linear feet of pipe, i5 linear
\\? \ \\\?\\\\ \ ??\ v\? \ feet of rip-rap dissipater)
1A
/III i 1 11 1 1\g \t \\\\ ??? \?\ AG•
I-- IQ Z-f
//// // / ? / i ice/ -- ?1 \? _ ???? \\ \ \\\ \• ?,
3650
NW 14
Road Crossing #2
{ /?// I(( i / / \ \ 60 linear feet of channel impact / - \ \
(50 linear feet of pipe; 10 linear : \ \ \ \
feet of rip-rap dissipater)
\-
\
\ \ \ \ \ _ NW 14
Road Crossing #2 \\ _ - \
1 \ \ 0.06 acres of wetland impact
z 3750
3800 _?
66 \30'
See Full-Size Site Plan Map // /? /I /l Ir /' I I?
for Actual Road Placement
/
11 l I t g ! 1 / I
Original road lay-out abandoned
because slope exceeds Watauga
County Standards and excessive cut
and fill required. New location more 1 I - NW 14 j
closely follows existing topography. ' I I \ 4 Road Crossing #3 /
New location approximately hatched. 1 I \ \ - - 0.03 acres of wetland impact /
'loll
Trrr
\\
rrrrrrr'???
?rr
\111 11 1\ \\\ \ \\\ \ 1 , --' ?/?? / I?? 1; 1 \ I
\? 1 \\ 1 \\ \\? \ \ \ 1 \ ?1 1 \ 1 1 1 LA
1
111 1 t \ 1\\\ \\\? ??\\ \\\\\\\\?\ \\?? \ \,?._-__ -??\?\ a ??? ???? \
_ \?
19-
NW.
Road Crossing #1
• . ? ? ? / ^ •\`•?. ? 80 linear feet of channel impact
(6S linear feet of pipe, 15 linear
\ `'\ feet of rip-rap dissipater)
4e
Air- 4004%*
-Z- ` .
ti TST 8- ,???? _ D
\4 f
i \ \\ SILT
FEN(`
'65 A
60 4V
_e ? TS"
RCO
/ .6
NW 14
Road Crossing #2
60 linear feet of channel impact
= - -
(SO linear feet of pipe; 10 linear 22
feet of rip-rap dissipater) + -
.30
`MT 27
TST 26
_RVE 21
TST3l },49x33 "ARCH _
CMP
'MT 3j
f L / SILT
[['err
131 24 --
TST 21
P rP E?2 0"
/ 42x29 ARCH ,
CMP TST 34\ - -' - - __ _ -_ - - __ -
lbD ,
PIPE s TDD
36 -
? RCD ?-*%*7
uMms of 4%%*
-ROD /---CONS RUC: oN RO sw, ,
1
78
Delineation Performed by: Wetland and Natural Resource Consultants, Inc.
720 South Main Avenue
Newton, NC 28658
Phone: [phone] Fax: [phone]
WETLAND DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
Project/Site: Carefree Cove Property Date: 6100
Applicant/Owner. CGR Development / Gina Razete County: Ashe County
Investigator: T Bandy, C Huysman, and J Robertson State. North Carolina
Do normal circumstances exist on the site?
Is the site significantly disturbed?
(Atypical situation)
Is the area a potential problem area?
(If needed, explain on reverse.)
VEGETATION
1. Juncus spp. grass FACW+
2. Carex spp. grass FACW+
3. Boehmeria cylindrica herb FACW+
4. Impatiens capensis herb FACW,
5. Solidago spp. herb FACW
6. Acer rubrum tree FAC
7. Comus amomum shrub FACW+
8. S. canadensis shrub FACW-
Yes Community ID: Wetland
No Transit ID: Wetland
No Plot ID: Wetland
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
16.
Percent of dominant species that are OBL, FACW or FAC (excluding FAC-): 100 %
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
X Recorded Data (describe in remarks) Wetland Hydroioav Indicators:
Stream, Lake or Tide Gauge Primary Indicators:
Aerial Photographs Inundated
Other X Saturated in Upper 12 Inches
No Recorded Data Available Water Marks
Drift Lines
Field Observations: Sediment Deposits
Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Depth of Surface Water. _0 to 1_ (in.) Secondary Indicators: (2 or more required)
X Oxidized Root Channels in
Depth to Free Water in Pit: 0 to 8_.. (in.) Upper 12 inches
X Water-Stained Leaves
Depth to Saturated Soil: 0 to 4_ (in.) Local Sal Survey Data
FAC Neutral Test
Other (explain in remarks)
Remarks: Wetlands associated with channel and groundwater seeps
WLdata.frmCGR-1000
Project # CGR-1000
SOILS
Map Unit Name
(Series and Phase): Wehadkee fine sandy loam
Drainage Class: poorly drained
Field Observations:
Taxonomy (Subgroup): Fluvaquentic Confirm Mapped Type? Ashe County Soil
Survey
Profit Description:
De h Matrix Color Mottle Colors Mottle Texture. Concretions,
(ins. Horizon (Munsell Moist) (Munsell Moist) Abundance/Contrast Structure etc.
0-9 Ap 10YR 4/3 loam
9-13 B1g 2.5Y 6/2 loam
13-32 B21g 5Y 6/1 sandy clay loam
HYdric Soil Indicators:
Histosol Concretions
Histic Epipedon High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soil
X Sulfidic Odor Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
X Aquic Moisture Regime X Listed on Local Hydric Soils List **
X Reducing Conditions Listed on National Hydric Soils List
X Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors Other (explain in remarks)
Remarks: Wetlands adjacent to channel
Wetland Determination
(yes or no)
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? YES
Wetland Hydrology Present? YES
Hydric Soils Present? YES
Is This Sampling Point Within a Wetland? YES
Remarks:
WLdata.frmCGR-1000
Delineation Performed by: Wetland and Natural Resource Consultants, Inc.
720 South Main Avenue
Newton, NC 28658
Phone: [phone] Fax: [phone]
WETLAND DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
Project/Site: Carefree Cove Property Date: 6100
Applicant/Owner: CGR Development / Gina Razete County: Ashe county
investigator T Bandy, C Huysman, and J Robertson State: North Carolina
Do normal circumstances exist on the site? Yes Community ID: Channel
Is the site significantly disturbed? No
(Atypical situation) Transit ID: Channel
Is the area a potential problem area? No Plot ID: Channel
(if needed, explain on reverse.)
VEGETATION
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
16.
Percent of dominant species that are OBL, FACW or FAC (excluding FAG): WA
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
X Recorded Data (describe in remarks) Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Stream, Lake or Tide Gauge Primary Indicators:
Aerial Photographs X Inundated
Other X Saturated in Upper 12 Inches
No Recorded Data Available Water Marks
Drift Lines
Field Observations: Sediment Deposits
Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Depth of Surface Water: -0 - 5_ (in.) Secondary Indicators. (2 or more required)
Oxidized Root Channels in
Depth to Free Water in Pit: 0 (in.) Upper 12 Inches
Water-Stained Leaves
Depth to Saturated Soil: 0 (in.) Local Soil Survey Data
FAC Neutral Test
Other (explain in remarks)
Remarks:
WLdata.frmCGR-1000
Project # CGR-1000
SOILS
Map Unit Name
(Series and Phase): Wehadkee fine sandy loam
Taxonomy (Subgroup): Fluvaquentic Endoaquepts
Drainage Class: poorly drained
Field Observations:
Confirm Mapped Type? Ashe County Soil
Survey
Profile Description:
Depth Matrix Color Mottle Colors Mottle Texture. Concretions,
ins. Horizon (Munsell Moist) (Munsell Moist) Abundance/Contrast Structure etc.
0-8 Ap 10YR 5/2 fine sandy loam
8-17 Bg1 10YR 4/1 loam
17-24 Bg2 10YR 6/1 sandy clay loam

Hydric Soil Indicators:
Histosol Concretions
Histic Epipedon High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soil
_X Sulfidic Odor Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
_X Aquic Moisture Regime X Listed on Local Hydric Soils List *`
X Reducing Conditions Listed on National Hydric Soils List
X Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors Other (explain in remarks)
Remarks: Bottom of Tributaries to Wallace Branch
Wetland Determination
(yes or no)
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? WA
Wetland Hydrology Present? YES
Hydric Soils Present? YES
Is This Sampling Point Within a Wetland? YES
Remarks:
WLdata.frmCGR-1000