HomeMy WebLinkAboutNC0028037_Compliance Evaluation Inspection_20200211ROY COOPER
Governor
MICHAEL S. REGAN
Secretary
S. DANIEL SMITH
Director
Ronald S. Walser
City of Lexington
28 W. Center St
Lexington, NC 27292
NORTH CAROLINA
Environmental Quality
February 11, 2020
Subject: Compliance Evaluation Inspection Report
NPDES Permit NCO028037
Lexington WTP #1 & 2, Davidson County
Dear Mr. Walser:
On January 14, 2020, Paul DiMatteo of the Division of Water Resources (Division), Winston-
Salem Regional Office met with Ronald Walser, Operator in Responsible Charge (ORC), to
conduct a Compliance Evaluation Inspection of the above referenced wastewater treatment plant.
This inspection consists of (1) a review of the permit and accompanying documentation to
determine compliance with permit conditions, and (2) an on -site inspection of several collection
system components. The attached inspection form notes the areas that were evaluated for the
inspection, with any notable findings outlined as follows.
Item of Concern
Mr. Walser explained that leachate from the residuals drying beds is designed to combine with the
effluent rather than cycle back to the lagoons for settling and treatment. The Division is concerned
that this arrangement could impact water quality, as this set up is not a typical design seen at other
water treatment facilities. Therefore, the Division wishes to investigate this issue further via
sampling inspections and discussion with the Water Quality Permitting Section. If you wish, you
may provide any additional sampling results or other information related to the above for review.
If you have any questions concerning this report, please contact Paul DiMatteo at (336) 776-9691
or me at (336) 776-9800.
Sincerellv,
Docuft ed by:
A, l sMak
L"L
L49 gonal Supervisor
cn mer,Ri
Water Quality Regional Operations Section
Winston-Salem Regional Office
Division of Water Resources, NCDEQ
Enclosures — Inspection Report
CC: WSRO Laserfiche Files
North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality I Division of Water Resources
Winston-Salem Regiona[ Office 1 450 West Hanes Mill Road, Suite 300 1 Winston-Salem, North Carolina 27105
kORrHCA
Den. add �o-Ul Q,,I,Ly /^� 336.776.9800
United States Environmental Protection Agency
Form Approved.
EPA Washington, D.C. 20460
OMB No. 2040-0057
Water Compliance Inspection Report
Approval expires 8-31-98
Section A: National Data System Coding (i.e., PCS)
Transaction Code NPDES yr/mo/day Inspection Type Inspector Fac Type
1 IN I 2 IF I 3 I NCO028037 111 12 I 20/01/14 I17 18 I S J 19 L G] 201 I
211111 I I I I I I II I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I II I I I I I f6
Inspection
Work Days Facility Self -Monitoring Evaluation Rating 131 QA ---------------------- Reserved -------------------
671
70 I I 71 I I 72 I r I 73 I I 174 751 I I I I I I I80
u I� I I i
Section B: Facility Data
Name and Location of Facility Inspected (For Industrial Users discharging to POTW, also include
Entry Time/Date
Permit Effective Date
POTW name and NPDES oermit Number)
09:30AM 20/01/14
15/04/01
Lexington WTP #1 & 2
2979 Old Greensboro St Extension
Exit Time/Date
Permit Expiration Date
Lexington INC 27292
10:45AM 20/01/14
20/02/29
Name(s) of Onsite Representative(s)/Titles(s)/Phone and Fax Number(s)
Other Facility Data
Ronald Stephen Walser/ORC/336-248-5820/
Name, Address of Responsible Official/Title/Phone and Fax Number
Contacted
Ronald S Walser,28 W Center St Lexington NC 27292/Utility Plant
Supervisor/336-248-3910/ No
Section C: Areas Evaluated During Inspection (Check only those areas evaluated)
Permit Flow Measurement Operations & Maintenance Records/Reports
Self -Monitoring Program Sludge Handling Disposal Facility Site Review Effluent/Receiving Waters
Laboratory
Section D: Summary of Finding/Comments (Attach additional sheets of narrative and checklists as necessary)
(See attachment summary)
Name(s) and Signature(s) of Inspector(s) Agency/Office/Phone and Fax Numbers Date
Paul DiMatteo �Docusigned by: DWR/WSRO WQ/336-776-9691/ 2/11/2020
4';M 1=4a
F10C7C2E5BB34D4...
Signature of Management Q A RevieLL1QdQ—'QQ—
EPA
Page#
NPDES yr/mo/day Inspection Type
NC0028037 I11 121 20/01/14 117 18 JCJ
Section D: Summary of Finding/Comments (Attach additional sheets of narrative and checklists as necessary)
During the inspection, the effluent looked rather turbid due to also carrying carbon dust. Carbon -rich
sludge is stored in the drying beds and leachate is sent to the effluent. Operators said this typically
happens during rain. He mentioned that they tested it some time ago and it wasn't over their turbidity
limits. I tried to observe the receiving stream downstream of the outfall but it already looked turbid due
to rain.
Page#
Permit: NCO028037 Owner - Facility: Lexington WTP #1 & 2
Inspection Date: 01/14/2020 Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation
Operations & Maintenance Yes No NA NE
Is the plant generally clean with acceptable housekeeping? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑
Does the facility analyze process control parameters, for ex: MLSS, MCRT, Settleable ❑ ❑ ❑
Solids, pH, DO, Sludge Judge, and other that are applicable?
Comment:
Permit
Yes No NA NE
(If the present permit expires in 6 months or less). Has the permittee submitted a new
0
❑
❑
❑
application?
Is the facility as described in the permit?
0
❑
❑
❑
# Are there any special conditions for the permit?
❑
0
❑
❑
Is access to the plant site restricted to the general public?
0
❑
❑
❑
Is the inspector granted access to all areas for inspection?
0
❑
❑
❑
Comment: The permit expires on 2/29/2020. The renewal application was received on 1/14/2020.
Record Keeping
Are records kept and maintained as required by the permit?
Is all required information readily available, complete and current?
Are all records maintained for 3 years (lab. reg. required 5 years)?
Are analytical results consistent with data reported on DMRs?
Is the chain -of -custody complete?
Dates, times and location of sampling
Name of individual performing the sampling
Results of analysis and calibration
Dates of analysis
Name of person performing analyses
Transported COCs
Are DMRs complete: do they include all permit parameters?
Has the facility submitted its annual compliance report to users and DWQ?
(If the facility is = or > 5 MGD permitted flow) Do they operate 24/7 with a certified operator
on each shift?
Is the ORC visitation log available and current?
Is the ORC certified at grade equal to or higher than the facility classification?
Is the backup operator certified at one grade less or greater than the facility classification?
Is a copy of the current NPDES permit available on site?
Yes No NA NE
❑
❑
❑
❑
❑
❑
❑
❑
❑
■
❑
❑
❑
❑
❑
❑
❑
❑
❑
❑
❑
❑
❑
❑
■
❑
❑ ❑ ❑
❑ ❑ ❑
❑ ❑ ❑
❑ ❑ ❑
Page# 3
Permit: NCO028037
Inspection Date: 01/14/2020
Record Keeping
Facility has copy of previous year's Annual Report on file for review?
Owner - Facility: Lexington WTP #1 & 2
Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation
Yes No NA NE
■ ❑ ❑ ❑
Comment: In response to the previous inspection, ORC began keeping a binder containing all relavent
visitation documents. Checked DMRs from 10/2018 and 8/2019.
Lagoons
Type of lagoons?
# Number of lagoons in operation at time of visit?
Are lagoons operated in?
# Is a re -circulation line present?
Is lagoon free of excessive floating materials?
# Are baffles between ponds or effluent baffles adjustable?
Are dike slopes clear of woody vegetation?
Are weeds controlled around the edge of the lagoon?
Are dikes free of seepage?
Are dikes free of erosion?
Are dikes free of burrowing animals?
# Has the sludge blanket in the lagoon (s) been measured periodically in multiple
locations?
# If excessive algae is present, has barley straw been used to help control the growth?
Is the lagoon surface free of weeds?
Is the lagoon free of short circuiting?
Yes No NA NE
Facultative
N
Parallel
❑
❑
■
❑
■
❑
❑
❑
❑
❑
■
❑
■
❑
❑
❑
■
❑
❑
❑
■
❑
❑
❑
■
❑
❑
❑
■
❑
❑
❑
■
❑
❑
❑
❑
❑
■
❑
❑
❑
❑
■
❑
❑
❑
Comment: Operator said the liner was replaced in 1 lagoon in the past year, and the other is to be
replaced this year.
De -chlorination
Type of system ?
Is the feed ratio proportional to chlorine amount (1 to 1)?
Is storage appropriate for cylinders?
# Is de -chlorination substance stored away from chlorine containers?
Comment:
Are the tablets the proper size and type?
Are tablet de -chlorinators operational?
Number of tubes in use?
Yes No NA NE
Liquid
❑ ❑ ■ ❑
❑ ❑ ■ ❑
Page# 4
❑ ❑ ■ ❑
❑ ❑ ■ ❑
Page# 4
Permit: NCO028037
Inspection Date: 01/14/2020
De -chlorination
Owner - Facility: Lexington WTP #1 & 2
Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation
Yes No NA NE
Comment: Dechlor is only added when decanting from the lagoons, as operators said that leachate
from the drying beds is not chlorinated.
Flow Measurement - Effluent
Yes No NA NE
# Is flow meter used for reporting?
0
❑
❑
❑
Is flow meter calibrated annually?
0
❑
❑
❑
Is the flow meter operational?
0
❑
❑
❑
(If units are separated) Does the chart recorder match the flow meter?
❑
❑
0
❑
Comment:
Effluent Sampling
Yes No NA NE
Is composite sampling flow proportional?
❑
❑
0
❑
Is sample collected below all treatment units?
0
❑
❑
❑
Is proper volume collected?
0
❑
❑
❑
Is the tubing clean?
❑
❑
0
❑
# Is proper temperature set for sample storage (kept at less than or equal to 6.0 degrees
❑
❑
❑
Celsius)?
Is the facility sampling performed as required by the permit (frequency, sampling type
0
❑
❑
❑
representative)?
Comment: DH. flow. chlorine. turbiditv and TSS run here. certification # 690: metals and toxicitv are
analyzed by Cameron Testing.
Effluent Pipe
Yes No NA NE
Is right of way to the outfall properly maintained?
❑
❑
❑
Are the receiving water free of foam other than trace amounts and other debris?
❑
❑
❑
If effluent (diffuser pipes are required) are they operating properly?
❑
❑
❑
Comment: Outfall was not viewed during the inspection due to area flooding/rain.
Drying Beds
Is there adequate drying bed space?
Is the sludge distribution on drying beds appropriate?
Are the drying beds free of vegetation?
# Is the site free of dry sludge remaining in beds?
Is the site free of stockpiled sludge?
Is the filtrate from sludge drying beds returned to the front of the plant?
• ❑ ❑ ❑
• ❑ ❑ ❑
• ❑ ❑ ❑
• ❑ ❑ ❑
• ❑ ❑ ❑
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Page# 5
Permit: NC0028037
Inspection Date: 01/14/2020
Drying Beds
# Is the sludge disposed of through county landfill?
# Is the sludge land applied?
(Vacuum filters) Is polymer mixing adequate?
Comment: Leachate from drying beds goes to the outfall.
Owner - Facility: Lexington WTP #1 & 2
Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation
Yes No NA NE
❑
❑
❑
❑
❑
❑
❑
❑
❑
Page# 6