310256_Compliance Evaluation Inspection_20200206

Facility Number - ® V Division of Water Resources 131 m S` 3
O Division of Soil and Water Conservation
O Other Agency
Type of Visit: C pliance Inspection Operation Review O Structure Evaluation O Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: Routine O Complaint O Follow-up O Referral O Emereencv O Other O Denied Access
Date of Visit: — - odo Arrival Time:: p Departure Time:County: �`) p� � Region: �
Farm Name: 11s�t,I�V RroVW1J t
irpx i Owner Email:
Owner Name: a e: i�A G QrO�JVv Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: an <) Title:
Onsite Representative: OTj1 a &P4WtJ
Certified Operator: 0-T 15 N By -P
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Design Current
Swine Capacity Pop.
Wean to Finish
Wean to Feeder
Feeder to Finish ')L8$ 0 00
Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder
Farrow to Finish
Gilts
Other
Other
Latitude:
Phone:
Integrator:Smli'l, ,,jj$ M)ghT�.owyn
Certification Number: 0 r7 I
Certification Number:
Design Current
Wet Poultry Capacity Pop.
La er
Non -La er
Design Current
Longitude:
Design Current
Cattle Capacity Pop.
Dairy Cow
Dairy Calf
Dairy Heifer
Dry Cow
Non -Dairy
Beef Stocker
Beef Feeder
Beef Brood Cow
Discharees and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes MNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
❑ Yes o
❑ NA
❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWR)
❑ Yes No
❑ NA
❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWR)
❑ Yes N
❑ NA
❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes 54 ❑ NA ❑ NE
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page 1 of 21412015 Continued

Facility Number: Date of Inspection:
Waste Collection & Treatment /
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
�
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Stricture 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: 1
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in): 9�
Observed Freeboard (in): oZ3
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes [O/No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes dNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWR
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes IrJ ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ 8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes �o ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes O? No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes �No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s): '"l Corn WhCy+ rug
13. Soil Type(s):
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
❑ Yes
dNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
T Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable
❑ Yes
do
❑ NA
❑ NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
dNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
ErNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
Required Records & Documents
No
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
[a
❑ NA
❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
❑ Yes
Ej6o
❑ NA
❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑WUP ❑Checklists ❑Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements
❑Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes
[�o
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis
❑ Waste Transfers
❑ Weather
Code
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and V Rainfall Inspections
El Sludge Survey
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑ Yes
[f"No
❑ NA
❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
❑ Yes
[j�No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Page 2 of
21412015 Continued

Facility Number: - Dateoflnspectioit: - -
oat)
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑ Yes
❑ NA
❑ NE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check
❑ Yes No
❑ NA
❑ NE
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑ Failute to develop a POA for sludge
levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes o
❑ NA
❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus Toss assessments (PLAT) certification'?
❑ YesNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do ubsurfaee tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewer/hispector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency'?
❑ Yes ZNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes Z/No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ff�No ❑ NA ❑ NE
3
Yes - No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes Z<
❑ Yes W
❑ Yes No
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
Comments (refer to question #): Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or any other comments. I
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations (use additional pages as necessary).
&1; 6m�im, due SvMmtr aoao
KeeQ Wee-07 records
RVr\ Ot.3 Skmeje-ootf P-Tndex S 4oLt CAu �4rEdwqj-d5(g1)0)77p-o- Q
Lag00n 51Vdje-331
Sm PN*P-a. S'
' 18 (W NmfC { 3x ai, w�eo,�j
P1an�ed! bob �a:\cd Fo p)Fnk -,)l-z-4
cf ae ho w� -� el�ds
wweQkv 0�1}' ac Cc�Jes- �Sfl�'1 icy j� do �o wl'th . pv^p�^, cb�a;n i� �ass;61e,
NON
(a-a1-19 S-9
1 -cl—)-0 1a,1
l�lo_a0 [1.(
-a0sior% IS (XWYLINCr
dN [8 Keljlovs l,.,otz'k'-
HAS 9C6�N f%tJr- 16 hlELli
APlCrL MATT 6vJ- -Vn-Y Ta
AVOID Ou&-e-A JCB77od of
Ak&--A vSr*G>t good
c )e(',
Reviewer/Inspector Name: 7pV1%) ilkgy' Phonet9low-+-95a
Reviewer/htspector Signature: Date: - (o—
Page 3 of 3 21412015