Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout090040_Inspection_20191029ivision of Water Resources Facility Number - O Division of Soil and Water Conservation O Other Agency . Type of Visit: C,o�mppliance Inspection O Operation Review O Structure Evaluation O Technical Assistance Reason for Visit: U xoutine O Complaint O Follow-up O Referral O Emergency O Other O Denied Access Date of Visit: 9 Arrival Time: / Departure Time: 6Q County: ,t. �=t Region: Farm Name: i �� ���� �� 5 �, ,�¢- Owner Email: Owner Name: %�, �; la g �� ✓a��� /��, ,r� Phone: Mailing Address: Physical Address: Facility Contact: Title: tzL- Z -N� Phone: Onsite Representative: r'j tee Integrator: Certified Operator: 71� .�i %c'!��� c}� Certification Number: Back-up Operator: Location of Farm: Swine Wean to Finish Wean to Feeder Feeder to Finish Farrow to Wean Farrow to Feeder Farrow to Finish Gilts Boars Other Other Certification Number: Latitude: Design Current Design Current Capacity Pop. Wet Poultry Capacity Pop. Layer Non -Layer Design Current Dry Poultry Capacity Pon. Layers Non -Layers Pullets Turkeys Turkey Poults Other Discharges and Stream Impacts 1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other: a. Was the conveyance man-made? b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWR) c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)? _ d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWR) 2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? 3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge? Longitude: Design Current Cattle Capacity Pop. Dairy Cow Dairy Calf Dairy Heifer Dry Cow Non -Dairy Beef Stocker Beef Feeder Beef Brood Cow ❑ Yes E]INo ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ Yes [�No [:]Yes O o DNA ❑NE ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ NA ❑ NE Page I of 3 21412015 Continued Facility Number: - 0 jDate of Inspection: 2 97AW Waste Collection & Treatment 4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ Yes eo ❑ NA ❑ NE a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6 Identifier: Spillway?: Designed Freeboard (in): Observed Freeboard (in): % 5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes ®fi<o ❑ NA ❑ NE (i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.) 6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes [�No ❑ NA ❑ NE waste management or closure plan? If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWR 7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes []'No ❑ NA ❑ NE 8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes E]�No ❑ NA ❑ NE (not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks) 9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes [/] N ❑ NA ❑ NE maintenance or improvement? Waste Application 10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE maintenance or improvement? 11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes [�fNo ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.) ❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil ❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window/ ❑ Evidence of Wind/Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area 12. Crop Type(s) 13. Soil Type(s): �..� 14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes [o ❑ NA ❑ NE 15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? E 'Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE 16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable ❑ Yes ❑No ❑ NA ❑ NE acres determination? 17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE 18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ Yes �o ❑ NA ❑ NE Required Records & Documents 19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available? ❑ Yes dNo ❑ NA ❑ NE 20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check ❑ Yes [frNo ❑ NA ❑ NE the appropriate box. ❑ WUP ❑ Checklists ❑ Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑ Other: 21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. 0 Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Weather Code ❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections ❑ Sludge Survey 22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes Q No ❑ NA ❑ NE 23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes eo ❑ NA ❑ NE Page 2 of 3 21412015 Continued Facility Number: a - 0 Date of Inspection: Z49 24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes Q o ❑ NA ❑ NE 25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check es ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE the appropriate box(es) below. ❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑ Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels Q-N'on-compliant sludge levels in any lagoon List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance: 26. Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes E]"No ❑ NA ❑ NE 27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification? ❑ Yes ®'No ❑ NA ❑ NE Other Issues 28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document and report mortality rates that were higher than normal? 29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately. 30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application) 31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below ❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other: ❑ Yes El"No ❑ Yes �No ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Yes �No ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Yes E5 No ❑ NA ❑ NE 32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes El"No ❑ NA ❑ NE 33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative? ❑ Yes ®No ❑ NA ❑ NE 34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency? ❑ Yes ETNo ❑ NA ❑ NE Comments (refer to question ft Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or any other comments. I Use drawings of facility to better explain situations (use additional pages as necessary). `rPL a, reel PCU ez'e_ ,xx 09— , vela-3 rl%ei �� %� •�(�' f}?G'� C�'�— l jam- �'' % ��' � ��J /%" ` Cr Reviewer/Inspector Name: Reviewer/Inspector Signatur Phone: /2 & �a- e2l_ �' / Date: A9 21412015 Page 3 of 3