20011820 Ver 1_COMPLETE FILE_20011210

W ATF Michael F. Easley, Governor
? ?QG William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
r Gregory J. Thorpe, Ph.D.
> =i Acting Director
p Y Division of Water Quality
December 27, 2001
Dr. Michael Orbach
Duke University Marine Laboratory
135 Duke Marine Lab Road
Beaufort Beach, NC 28516-9721
.aAN - 8 ?
SUBJECT: Approval of 401 Water Quality and
Additional Conditions
Shoreline stabilization and Marsh
restoration
Western shoreline Duke Marine Lab
Property
DWQ Project # 011820
Carteret County
Dear Dr. Orbach:
You have our approval, in accordance with the attached conditions (WQC # 3274) to conduct the
following activity at the property located at 135 Duke Marine Lab Road, Beaufort in Carteret County. This
approval allows you to:
1). Remove 260' of asbestos sheeting forming the flounder pens;
2). Remove the top portion of the northern 250' bulkhead (see drawings);
3). Place a Class 2 granite rock sill offshore approximately 10-12 feet off the bulkhead of the NOAA
property to the north and exending to the flounder pen area (approximate length 300 feet with a bottom
width of 12.5 feet and a top width of 2 feet). The structure will have side slopes of 1.5 :1 and will be
approximately 3.5 feet in height extending to approximately 0.5 feet above nhw and at it's most
waterward extent, the structure will be 70 feet offshore;
4). Fill with suitable sand behind the sill to within tidal flood range and plant marsh plants in tidal
flood zone and upland plants along the west border line;
5). Place a 426' stone revetment along outer face of remaining bulkhead along west border (see
drawings).
This approval is only valid for the purpose and design that you described in your CAMA application
dated December 10, 2001 received by the Division of Water Quality (DWQ). After reviewing your
application, we have determined that General Water Quality Certification Number 3274 covers this activity.
This Certification allows you to use your CAMA Permit when the NC Division of Coastal Management
issues it. Please keep in mind that there may be additional Federal, State or Local regulations applicable to
your project, such as (but not limited to) Sediment and Erosion Control, Non-Discharge and Water Supply
Watershed regulations and Coastal Stormwater. In addition, this approval will expire when the
accompanying CAMA Permit expires unless otherwise specified in the General Certification.
This approval is only valid for the purpose and design that you described in your CAMA
application dated December 10, 2001. If you change or modify your project, you must notify the Division
(DWQ) in writing and you may be required to send us a new application for a new certification. If the
Ex127. Cardinal Drive t., Wilmington, NC 28405-3845 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer -
DE-NR
Page Two
Dr. Michael Orbach
December 27, 2001
property is sold, the new owner must be given a copy of the Certification and approval letter and is thereby
responsible for complying with all conditions. If total wetland fills for this project (now or in the future)
exceed one acre, compensatory mitigation may be required as described in 15A NCAC 2H .0506 (h). For
this approval to be valid, you must follow the conditions listed in the attached certification and the
additional conditions listed below.
1). Turbidity, controls must be maintained when dredging and during the placement of material on the beach
re'a so t turbidity does not exceed 25 NTUs outside the project area (i.e., Turbidity curtains). Please
contact this Office at the number listed below if there are any problems with turbidity.
2). The attached Certificate of Completion (COC) must be submitted to the Division upon final
construction of the site.
Please notify this Office at the number listed below if any problem arises during the construction of the project
that may affect water quality.
If you do not accept any of the conditions of this certification, you may ask for an adjudicatory
hearing. You must act within 60 days of the date that you receive this letter. To ask for a hearing, send a
written petition conforming to Chapter 150B of the North Carolina General Statutes to the Office of
Administrative Hearings, 6714 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, N.C. 27699-6714. This certification and its
conditions are final and binding unless you ask for a hearing.
This letter completes the review of the DWQ Permit # 011820 under Section 401 of the Clean Water
Act. If you have any questions, please telephone Joanne Steenhuis or Rick Shiver at 910-395-3900.
Sincerely,

?7 Gregory J. Thorpe, Ph.D.
Acting Director, Division of Water Quality
Attachments: GC # 3274
Certificate of Completion
cc: Corps of Engineers Wilmington Field Office - Henry Wicker
WiRO- Joanne Steenhuis
CAMA Wilmington -Tere Barrett
CAMA Raleigh - Doug Huggett
Central Files
? W A TF Michael F: Easley, Governor
\O?? RQG William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
CO W7 Gregory J. Thorpe, Ph.D.
> .? Acting Director
.? Division of Water Quality
December 27, 2001
Dr. Michael Orbach
Duke University Marine Laboratory
135 Duke Marine Lab Road
Beaufort Beach, NC 28516-9721
SUBJECT: Approval of 401 Water Quality and
Additional Conditions
Shoreline stabilization and Marsh
restoration
Western shoreline Duke Marine Lab
Property
DWQ Project # 011820
Carteret County
Dear Dr. Orbach:
You have our approval, in accordance with the attached conditions (WQC # 3274) to conduct the
following activity at the property located at 135 Duke Marine Lab Road, Beaufort in Carteret County. This
approval allows you to:
1). Remove 260' of asbestos sheeting forming the flounder pens;
2). Remove the top portion of the northern 250' bulkhead (see drawings);
3). Place a Class 2 granite rock sill offshore approximately 10-12 feet off the bulkhead of the NOAA
property to the north and exending to the flounder pen area (approximate length 300 feet with a bottom
width of 12.5 feet and a top width of 2 feet). The structure will have side slopes of 1.5 :1 and will be
approximately 3.5 feet in height extending to approximately 0.5 feet above nhw and at it's most
waterward extent, the structure will be 70 feet offshore;
4). Fill with suitable sand behind the sill to within tidal flood range and plant marsh plants in tidal
flood zone and upland plants along the west border line;
5). Place a 426' stone revetment along outer face of remaining bulkhead along west border (see
drawings).
This approval is only valid for the purpose and design that you described in your CAMA application
dated December 10, 2001 received by the Division of Water Quality (DWQ). After reviewing your
application, we have determined that General Water Quality Certification Number 3274 covers this activity.
This Certification allows you to use your CAMA Permit when the NC Division of Coastal Management
issues it. Please keep in mind that there may be additional Federal, State or Local regulations applicable to
your project, such as (but not limited to) Sediment and Erosion Control, Non-Discharge and Water Supply
Watershed regulations and Coastal Stormwater. In addition, : this approval will expire when the
accompanying CAMA Permit expires unless otherwise specified in the General Certification.
This approval is only valid for the purpose and design that you described in your CAMA
application dated December 10, 2001. If you change or modify your project, you must notify the Division
(DWQ) in writing and you may be required to send us a new application for a new certification. If the
N DE
Ex127 Cardinal Drive t., Wilmington, NC 28405-3845 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer
Page Two
Dr. Michael Orbach
December 27, 2001
property is sold, the new owner must be given a copy of the Certification and approval letter and is thereby
responsible for complying with all conditions. If total wetland fills for this project (now or in the future)
exceed one acre, compensatory mitigation may be required as described in 15A NCAC 2H .0506 (h). For
this approval to be valid, you must follow the conditions listed in the attached certification and the
additional conditions listed below.
1). Turbidity controls must be maintained when dredging and during the placement of material on the beach
area so that turbidity does not exceed 25 NTUs outside the project area (i.e., Turbidity curtains). Please
contact this Office at the number listed below if there are any problems with turbidity.
2). The attached Certificate of Completion (COC) must be submitted to the Division upon final
construction of the site.
Please notify this Office at the number listed below if any problem arises during the construction of the project
that may affect water quality.
If you do not accept any of the conditions of this certification, you may ask for an adjudicatory
hearing. You must act within 60 days of the date that you receive this letter. To ask for a hearing, send a
written petition conforming to Chapter 150B of the North Carolina General Statutes to the Office of
Administrative Hearings, 6714 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, N.C. 27699-6714. This certification and its
conditions are final and binding unless you ask for a hearing.
This letter completes the review of the DWQ Permit # 011820 under Section 401 of the Clean Water
Act. If you have any questions, please telephone Joanne Steenhuis or Rick Shiver at 910-395-3900.
Sincerely,
Gregory J. Thorpe, Ph.D.
Acting Director, Division of Water Quality
Attachments: GC # 3274
Certificate of Completion
cc: Corps of Engineers Wilmington Field Office - Henry Wicker
WiRO- Joanne Steenhuis
401/Wetland Unit, Central Office - Cyndi Karoly
CAMA Wilmington -Tere Barrett
CAMA Raleigh - Doug Huggett
Central Files
©I a t Cc„r-e Vim; X5,5 '& e

REPLY TO
ATTENTION OF:
8) DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY
WILMINGTON DISTRICT, CORPS OF ENGINEERS
P.O. BOX 1890
WILMINGTON. NORTH CAROLINA 28402-1890
January 2, 2002
Regulatory Division
Action ID No. 200200219
Mr. Michael Orbach
Duke University Marine Laboratory
135 Duke Marine Lab Road
Beaufort, North Carolina 28516
Dear Mr. Orbach:
MAIM _ 7 V
On July 24, 2000, we renewed general permit No. 198000291 (copy enclosed), which
provides Federal authorization for construction activities that receive authorization from the State
of North Carolina.
A review of your application received December 13, 2001, for Department of the Army
authorization to construct a shoreline stabilization project by restoring marsh, removing flounder
pens, constructing an offshore stone sill, and protecting the existing bulkhead with riprap at the
Duke Marine Lab facility on Piver's Island, Carteret County, North Carolina, indicates it to be a
candidate for Federal authorization under this general permit. Accordingly, the administrative
processing of your application will be accomplished by the North Carolina Division of Coastal
Management. Comments from Federal review agencies will be furnished to the State.
If your application must be withdrawn from this general permit process for any reason,
you will be informed regarding its further management. If there are no unresolved differences in
State-Federal positions or policies, the final action taken on your application by the State will
result in your receiving written notice from us that your application is consistent with the general
permit and you may commence your activity. Only after receiving such confirmation should
begin work.
Your application, pursuant to Section 404 of the Clean Water Act and Section 10 of the
River and Harbor Act, has been assigned Action ID No. 200200219 and will be coordinated by
the undersigned in the Wilmington Regulatory Field Office. If you have questions or comments
you may contact me at telephone [phone].
Sincerely,
Henry Wicker, Project Manager
Wilmington Regulatory Field Office
Enclosure
Copies Furnished (without enclosure):
Mr. Doug Huggett
Division of Coastal Management
North Carolina Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
1638 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1638
Mr. John Dorney
Division of Water Quality
North Carolina Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
1650 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1650
Mr. Garland B. Pardue
U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service
Fish and Wildlife Enhancement
Post Office Box 33726
Raleigh, North Carolina 27636-3726
Mr. David Rackley
National Marine Fisheries Service, NOAA
219 Fort Johnson Road
Charleston, South Carolina 29412-9110
Mr. William L. Cox, Chief
Wetlands Section-Region IV
Water Management Division
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
61 Forsyth Street, SW
Atlanta, Georgia 30303
Mr. Ted Tyndall Jr., District Manager
Morehead City Regional Office
North Carolina Division of Coastal Management
151-B Highway 24
Hestron Plaza II
Morehead City, North Carolina 28557
Mr. Ron Sechler
National Marine Fisheries Service, NOAA
Pivers Island
Beaufort, North Carolina 28516
2

REPLY TO
ATTENTION OF:
Regulatory Division
Action ID No. 200200219
January 23, 2002
Mr. Doug Huggett
Division of Coastal Management
North Carolina Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
1638 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1638
Dear Mr. Huggett:
01
• .J 1 ,?"?? ???f ?rs
Reference the application of Duke University Marine Laboratory to construct a shoreline
stabilization project by restoring marsh, removing flounder pens, constructing an offshore stone
sill, and protecting the existing bulkhead with riprap at the Duke Marine Lab facility on Piver's
Island, Carteret County, North Carolina.
The Federal agencies have completed review of the proposal as presented by the
application and your field investigation report.
We recommend that the following conditions be included in the State authorization:
1. All work authorized by this permit must be performed in strict compliance with the
permit plans, which are a part of this permit.
2. No excavation or filling will be permitted between the dates of April 1 and
September 30 of any year without the prior approval of the North Carolina Division of Coastal
Management and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers.
3. All excavated materials will be confined landward of the mean high water (MHW)
elevation contour and any regularly or irregularly flooded vegetated wetlands.
4. No vegetated wetlands will be excavated or filled.
DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY
WILMINGTON DISTRICT, CORPS OF ENGINEERS
P.O. BOX 1890
WILMINGTON. NORTH CAROLINA 28402-1890
5. The temporary placement or double handling of excavated or fill materials within
waters or vegetated wetlands is not authorized.
6. This permit does not authorize the interference with any existing or proposed Federal
project, and the permittee will not be entitled to compensation for damage or injury to the
authorized structure or work that may be caused from existing or future operations undertaken by
the United States in the public interest.
7. No attempt will be made by the permittee to prevent the full and free use by the public
of all navigable waters at or adjacent to the authorized work. Use of the permitted activity must
not interfere with the public's right to free navigation on all navigable waters of the United
States.
8. The authorized structure and associated activity will not cause an unacceptable
interference with navigation.
9. The activity will be conducted in such a manner as to prevent a significant increase in
turbidity outside the area of construction or construction-related discharge. Increases such that
the turbidity in the waterbody is 50 NTU's or less in all rivers not designated as trout waters by
the North Carolina Division of Environmental Management (NCDEM), 25 NTU's or less in all
saltwater classes and in all lakes and reservoirs, and 10 NTU's or less in trout waters, are not
considered significant.
10. This Department of the Army permit does not obviate the need to obtain other Federal,
State, or local authorizations required by law.
11. The permittee understands and agrees that, if future operations by the United States
require the removal, relocation, or other alteration, of the structure or work herein authorized, or if,
in the opinion of the Secretary of the Army or his authorized representative, said structure or work
shall cause unreasonable obstruction to the free navigation of the navigable waters, the permittee
will be required, upon due notice from the Corps of Engineers, to remove, relocate, or alter the
structural work or obstructions caused thereby, without expense to the United States. No claim
shall be made against the United States on account of any such removal or alteration.
12. No portion of any structure will be located within 61 feet of the near bottom edge
of the Federally maintained channel.
13. If the display of lights and signals on the authorized structure is not otherwise provided
for by law, such lights and signals as may be prescribed by the U.S. Coast Guard will be installed
and maintained by and at the expense of the Permittee.
In addition, the permittee shall notify
NOAA/NATIONAL OCEAN SERVICE
Chief Source Data Unit
Attention: Sharon Tear N CS261
1315 E West HWY RM 7316
Silver Spring, MD 20910-3282
2
i
at least two weeks prior to beginning work and upon completion of work.
Should you have any questions or comments, please contact the undersigned at telephone
[phone].
Sincerely,
Henry Wicker, Project Manager
Wilmington Regulatory Field Office
Copies Furnished:
Mr. John Dorney
Division of Water Quality Section
North Carolina Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
1650 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1621
Dr. Garland Pardue
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
Fish and Wildlife Enhancement
Post Office Box 33726
Raleigh, North Carolina 27636-3726
Mr. C. Robert Stroud, Jr., District Manager
Wilmington Regional Office
127 Cardinal Drive Extension
North Carolina Division of Coastal Management
Wilmington, North Carolina 28405
Commanding Officer
U.S. Coast Guard
Marine Safety Office Wilmington
1502 North 23rd Street
Wilmington, North Carolina 28405
Mr. Ron Sechler
National Marine Fisheries Service, NOAA
Pivers Island
Beaufort, North Carolina 28516
Mr. David Rackley
National Marine Fisheries Service, NOAA
219 Fort Johnson Road
Charleston, South Carolina 29412-9110
Mr. Ronald J. Mikulak, Chief
Wetlands Section - Region IV
Water Management Division
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
61 Forsyth Street, SW
Atlanta, Georgia 30303
3
DIVISION OF COASTAL MANAGEMENT {
FIELD INVESTIGATION REPORT
1. APPLICANT'S NAME: Duke University Marine Laboratory/Dr. Michael Orbach
2. LOCATION OF PROJECT SITE Adjacent to Beaufort Channel along the west side of the Duke
Marin Lab property on Piver's Island, off of Old Causeway Rd. between Beaufort and Morehead City.
Photo Index - 2000: #528, grid 17 T,U 1995: #528, grid 4 V,W
State Plane Coordinates - X: 2699700 Y: 359200-600 Rover # L111413A
3. INVESTIGATION TYPE: CAMA/D&F
4. INVESTIGATIVE PROCEDURE: Dates of Site Visit - May 09, 2001; Nov. 14, 2001
Was Applicant Present - Yes; No
5. PROCESSING PROCEDURE: Application Received - cc: Nov. 30, 2001
Office - Morehead City
6. SITE DESCRIPTION:
(A) Local Land Use Plan - Carteret County
Land Classification From LUP - Developed/Conservation
(B) AEC(s) Involved: CS, EW, PT
(C) Water Dependent: Yes
(D) Intended Use: Private
(E) Wastewater Treatment: Existing - Beaufort municipal
Planned - None
(F) Type of Structures: Existing - Bulkhead, asbestos flounder pens
Planned - Marsh restoration project, rock sill, riprap
(G) Estimated Annual Rate of Erosion: N/A
Source - N/A
7
HABITAT DESCRIPTION:
[AREA]
DRET)GRD FTT .T .ET) OTNFR
3
(A) Vegetated Wetlands
(B) Non-Vegetated Wetlands
(C) Other - Shallow Bottom Habitat
High Ground - CS 17,110 sf
7,500 sf
(D) Total Area Disturbed: 24, 610 (.56 acre)
(E) Primary Nursery Area: No
(F) Water Classification: SA Open: No
PROJECT SUMMARY: Duke Marine Lab proposes to construct a shoreline stabilization project by
restoring marsh, removing flounder pens, constructing an offshore stone sill, and protecting the
existing bulkhead with riprap.
FIELD INVESTIGATION REPORT:
Duke Marine Lab
Page 02
9. NARRATIVE DESCRIPTION:
The applicant is Dr. Michael Orbach, on behalf of the Duke Marine Lab facility on Piver's Island, Carteret County.
Piver's Island is an historic fill peninsula extending southward from the Morehead/Beaufort Causeway into the waters
of Beaufort Inlet. The project tract is 14.5 acres in size, averaging +3' to +6' above sea level. The soil composition
on the property is predominantly historic spoil, and vegetation is ornamental. The western shoreline of the property is
stabilized by an asbestos bulkhead to the north, and timber and concrete walls to the south. There is a ±70' section
toward the southern end that is stabilized with marl. This area appears to have been avoided with the bulkhead for the
installation of a boat ramp, which was never constructed. The bottom composition of Beaufort Inlet in this area is
sandy, ridged, and indicative of high energy systems. The bottom is riddled with shell material, but few live shellfish,
excepting oysters on the bulkhead, pier pilings, and flounder pen. There is an existing flounder pen composed of
asbestos sheeting that is in very poor repair, and has not been used recently. The upland portion of this tract is
bordered by Piver's Island Road. The facility is serviced by Beaufort municipal water and sewer services.
The waters of Beaufort Inlet around the project site are classified SA by the Division of Water Quality. The area is
not a designated Primary Nursery Area, and is closed to the taking of shellfish for consumption. The Carteret County
Land Use Plan classifies this area of the county as Developed, with all AEC's classified as Conservation.
The proposal is for an overall shoreline stabilization project, avoiding the replacement of the vertical bulkhead walls.
The 260' of asbestos sheeting forming the flounder pens will be removed. The top portion of the northern 250' of
bulkhead wall will be removed. A rock sill, approximately 300' in length with a bottom width of 12.5' is to be
constructed offshore. This structure will begin approximately 10' - 12' off of the bulkhead of the NOAA property to
the north, extending southward and arcing around the flounder pen area. At its most waterward extent, the structure
will be 70' offshore. The sill will have a 2' top width, with 1.5:1 side slopes. The structure will be approximately
3.5' in height, extending to approximately .5' above the nhw level. It will be composed of Class 2 Granite, and will
have two "drop. down" areas with 11' top and 5' bottom widths. These depression areas will have an elevation equal
to the substrate elevation of marsh growing further along the shoreline. The sill will be placed on a layer of geotextile
material to prevent settling.
The sill will end where the riprap, or revetment begins along the southern half of the existing bulkhead. The rock
revetment will extend 10' from the bulkhead, for a length of 426'. At the point where there is a 70' gap in the
bulkhead wall, the rock will "wing" landward and connect to existing marl. At the beginning point of this structure,
rock is proposed around the southern end of the NOAA bulkhead to prevent scouring. Likewise, at the southern end
of the portion of the bulkhead to be cut, there is a small section of rock to wrap the comer and prevent scouring.
Current movement along this shoreline is predominantly north/south, and consequently the applicant expects scouring.
Along the 250' stretch of shoreline at the northern end of the project, there is a marsh restoration project proposed.
The bulkhead cap will be cut, and the area landward graded from the nhw elevation to an elevation of +2.28' nhw,
for the planting of high marsh to high ground vegetation. A 10' wide shrub vegetated berm will border the eastern
edge of the marsh restoration project. Waterward of the bulkhead, clean sand will be used to begin at the nhw
elevation and grade to the rock sill at the elevation of the waterward edge of marsh growing in the same system. This
area will be vegetated with SSpart ina alterniflora. Oysters presently in the project area will be planted along the newly
constructed rock sill.
lo. ANTICIPATED IMPACTS:
As proposed, the rock sill and revetment portion of the proposal will fill 8010 square feet of sandy shallow bottom
habitat. The marsh restoration area will fill another 9100 square feet of sandy shallow bottom area for the placement
of fill and planting of marsh species. The upland portion of the proposal will affect ±7500 square feet for the grading
to accomplish necessary elevations for the chosen high marsh and upland vegetation. The total disturbance area for
this proposal is 24,610 square feet, or .56 acres.
The rock revetment, or riprap is a traditional shoreline stabilization structure, and except for the bottom incorporation
Page 02
T?uke Marine Lab
area, poses little possibility for impacts, assuming proper materials and installation. The sill offers different impact
possibilities in the areas of navigation hazard at 70' offshore, and greater difficulties for stabilizing the structure.
Using Class 2 Granite should eliminate the problem of stability. Navigation will be largely unaffected, as the channel
is located approximately 100' west of the existing flounder pens, and the sill will be located up to 15' west of the
flounder pens. The greatest potential for impacts to the estuarine system from this type of proposal comes from the
placement of unconsolidated fill material. Along a high energy shoreline such as this, the difficulties of fill
containment are greater still. The applicant has proposed to place sediment booms along the waterward side of the
project during installation to reduce the possibility of turbidity problems.
T. Barrett December 07, 2001 MoreheadCity
APPLICATION
(Follows format of Farm DCM-MR1)
1. APPLICANT
a. Landowner:
NOV 8 2001
Name: Duke 1AAyersity Marine Laboratory
Address: 135 Duke Maxine Lab Road
Beaufort, NC 28516-9721
Day Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
b. Authorized Agent: Dr. Michael Orbach
Address: same as above E-Mail: MKOODUKE.EDU
C. Project Name: Shoreline Stabilization and Marsh Restoration
Along Western Shoreline of Duke Marine Lab PrV.yrt
2. LOCATION OF PROPOSED PROJECT
a. County: Carteret
b. City, town, community or landmark Beaufort. NC
c. Street Address: 135 Duke Marine Lab Road
d. Is proposed work within city limits or planning jurisdiction? YES
e. Name of body of water nearest project: Beaufort Net
N
Newport River 101
W 70
Morebsad City
Radio
Island
Duke Marine Lab S
Pivers Island
E

ii. DESCRIPTION AND PLANNED USE OF PROPOSED PROJECT
NO V 2 8 2001
a. List all development activities proposed:
• Demolition of existing Flounder Pens.
• Removal of upper portion of existing bulkhead for 250 feet.
• Construction of stone sill structure.
• Fill with sandy soil behind sill to within tidal flood range.
• Planting marsh plants in tidal flood zone and upland plants along west border line.
• Placing a stone revetment along outer face of remaining buMead along west border.
b. Is the proposed activity maintenance or new work?
The proposed activity is both maintenance of an existing bulkhead using stone armor facing and
creation of new stone sill and restoration of tidal marsh in lieu of rigid bulkhead where possible.
c. Will the project be for public, private or commercial use?
The project is for preservation and protection of private property.
d. Give a brief description of purpose, use, methods of construction and daily operations of the project.
The existing bulkhead and flounder pens have deteriorated over time and are m need of
maintenance. The flounder pews are no longer in use. The purpose of this project is to maintain
the westem shoreline of the property using construction methods that will support and enhance
the surrounding environment. This project has two parts: 1) construction of a stone sill and
restoration of tidal marsh in the northern part and 2) construction of a stone revetment in the
southern portion.
The northern portion of the existing wall (approximately 250 lineal feet) borders deteriorated
flounder pens that extend 55 feet into tidal waters. The sandy bottom outside the pens is
approximately 4 feet below Mean High Water. A stone sill (approximately 300 lineal feet) will
be constructed around the existing flounder pens. The stone sill will be depressed to a depth
equal to the interior marsh bottom grade at a minimum spacing of every 100 feet along the sill to
allow tidal water and marine life into the enclosed marsh area. A turbidity curtain will be used
around the work area to contain silt and sediment during constriction. The asbestos sheeting and
wood bracing of the flounder pens will be removed and properly disposed of at a licensed landfill..
The concrete cap and upper section of the bulkhead will also be demolished and disposed of in
like manner. The site will then be graded behind the stone sill to create a gradual sloping bottom
ranging from Mean Sea Level Elevation at the stone sill to Mean Hugh Water Elevation at the
existing bulkhead wall and then sloping up to meet existing ground (about 2 feet above high
water) in a distance of approximately 20 feet. Oysters lying in the path of construction will be
relocated to the base of the new stone sill. The lower marsh and upland slope will be planned with
local native species of marsh plants; an additional 10 foot apron beyond the slope will be planted
with upland plains to form a vegetative berm. See Section A for additional details.
The southern portion of the existing wall (approximately 426 lineal feet) borders the Backwaters
of Beaufort Channel which is subject to flood and ebb tidal currents. A turbidity curtain will be
used around the work area to contain silt and sediment during construction. The proposed
maintenance is to construct a stone revelment along the west side of the existing wall. Oysters
growing along the base of this wall will be relocated prior to construction of each section of
revetment. See Section B for additional details.
NOV 2 8 2001
4,
North
NavigationMarkers (?) --------
Construction of New Stone Sill
(300 lineal feet) +i
t
S S ;'
Remnant Flounder Pens to be Removed ............. &.
Depress Sill in Two Locations
Fill to Tidal Range / Marsh Plants
High Marsh/Native Upland Vegetation _
Upland Berm (10 ft.) Native Vegetation
?•/i W
/o,l =` W W
`11 ....... ......._W w
`o w
A 1 I
NOAA Property
Existing Bulkhead
to Remain
Stone Revetment for
Endwall Protection
Section "A"
Applies Here
250'
s
?s

,
,
,
Transition Zone Q
From
Sill to Revetment ;
Flood
n
Backwater of
Beaufort Channel
v
Ebb
SW Corner of
Pivers Island
Scale 1" = 100 Ft.
Blda.
t23,"2 6'
......................
,
Undisturbed Area
20 ft. Return
/
,---. Walls
Upper Wall Section
to be Removed
Stone Revetment for
Endwall Protection
New Stone Revetment
(approx. 426')
Existing Bulkhead to
150' Remain
See Section "B"
,
,,,\g Concrete Wall
To Remain
?J J
Owner: Duke University
Date: November 19, 2001
Location: Pivers Island
Duke Marine Lab Site Plan
West Boundary of Property
NOV 2 8 2001
II 3??
Stone Sill
Class RR Granite
Crest -0.5 Ft (MB.W)
Top 2FL Wide
Max. Height = 3.51
Max Base =17-5,
Side Slope L5H 1V
Geotedfle below Base
MEW
W CM
I Scale l" = 20 Ft
Area of Sandy Fill and Slope Regrading (Distance Varies)
4 10
Vegetative
Marsh Planting Area (Distance Vanes) Bmrm-_,
oyster
Relocation -----
C1ean?Sand Fill _---------- j" I Remove Upper
:---- I Wall Section
nave Sheeting
Existinu Grade
Section "A" I
r
55
0
-30

Drop--Down Area Tolnl Depression=ll feet
Depress Stone Sill as shown on
sketch at the right. Depress sill
in two locations shown on the
site plan. The Depression
should follow a 1.5H:IV slope

both down and -up vvith a 5 foot
flatbottomat -4 ?? Ml3w 0.5 Fit .- ..... __ _ . _ w -

2 Ft
IS) ??? C
? D
s "-- " -"
/1???.f? (-1 gR
Geotegtile

Class II Granite Revetment
Crest to matchtop of existing Cap.
Top width approximately 1 Ft
Base VAdth Varies (Max 10 Ft)
Height Varies (Max. 5 Ft)
Side Slope 1.5R-IV
Geotextile below Base & along wall ExistingWall
Affm 14-to Remain
(30 Existing Grade
Q-
C,Geo
fl-=-?
Geotextile I
Sectim "B"
Scale .1" = 4A
i
3A. FIELD NOTES
Summary of Field Notes taken on 9/13/01 by Tracy Skcabal, Melanie Severin and Bill Zaist
- - • 4 O 2001
Location Average ab Water Elevation I&n ifiedby Plant Species
Point Elevation
A -2.41 wCm
B 0.0 C 2.28 Mi3w k , ?
K104 s WATEkWA t t, 669- a V YI T Spaitina Patens
t.-adV MAKS9
v ? Spartina Alternifloia
I/
The existing wall is used as a baseline. The intersection with the north property line is station 0 + 00.
The i b igbted cells indicate probable location of center of sill. Elevations are based on M13W = 0.00
Elevations at locations relative to the existing bulkhead wall. 0
Station Top of
wall Base of
wan 10' west 20' west 30' west 401 west 5W west
0-20 3.05 -3.16 =3.34 -3:74
0+00 1.82 -2.69 -2.99 -3.29 -3.74 -4.08
0+50 1.86 -2.47 -2.73 -2.86 -3.01 -3.11 -3.45
1+00 1.85
Flounder -2.33
Pen Area -3.70
Station
0+70 to 1+55, 45' west 55' west 65' west
-3.90 -3.91
1+50 1.84 -1.20 -2.68 -4.55 -4.46 .:3.78 -4.25
2+00 1.85 -2.78 -3.28 -3.91 -"7 -4.82
2+50 1.83 2.76 -3.64 -4.54 -5.50
3+00 1.81 -2.44 -3.74 -5.52
3+50 1.81 -2.14 -3.09 -5.47
4+00 1.84 -2.16 -3.50
4+50 1.82 -3.19 -4.49
5+00 No Wall -1.21 -3.77
5+50 No Wall -1.16
6+00 1.80 -3.29 -4.47
6+50 1.71 -3.18 449 15' west
-5.17
7+00 1.85 -3.50 -4.56 -5.12
7+10 End of Project
°? ? ? zoor
4. LAND AND WATER CHARACTERISTICS rvoa. Size of entire tract:

Duke Property consists of approximately 14.5 acres; however, this project only impacts 710 lineal
feet of shoreline (approximately '/z acre) along the west border of the property.
b. Size of individual lots: Not Apphcgble
c. Approximate elevation of tract above Mean High Water
Duke Property ranges from 3 to 6 feet above MHiW.
d Soil type and texture of tract.
The soil on site consists of medium to fine sand. Most of the sand was formerly dredged from the
adjacent Beaufort Channel.
e. Vegetation on tract: Mostly mowed lawn glass with shrubs planted throughout.
f. Man-made features on tract
The Duke Marine Laboratory and. Classroom Buildings along with roads and parking areas.
g. What is the CAMA Land Use Plan land classification of the site?
?csAl???ZVi4Tl aN?? ? ??;b a t
h. How is the tract zoned by local Government?
University Campus
i. Is the proposed project consistent with the applicable zoning? YES
j. Hasa professional ardieological assessment been done for the tract? NO
k. Is the project located in a National Registered Historic District or does it involve a National Register
listed or eligible property?
NO
1. Are there wetlands on the site? veS
m. Describe existing wastewater treatment facilities.
Beaufort City Sewer
n. Describe location and type of discharges. to waters of the state. (For example: surface runoff, sanitary
wastewater, industrial/commercial effluent, "wash down" and residential discharges.)
Several Small Seawater Recirculation Lines
5uR_T-- ce 2U A) O F F Avja it 30/
o. Describe existing drinking water supply so ceJ c
Beaufort City Water ?DO j
5. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
• A copy of the deed to property is attached.
• Work Plat and cross-section views were provided in preceding pages.
• Location map is provide as part of Section 2 above.
• Stormwater Certification - Not applicable since no upland work is contemplated.
• Names and Addresses of adjacent waterfront landowners.
Name: NOAA / National Ocean Service Center Mr. Rod Hoel
for Coastal Fisheries and Habitat Research 424 Old Causeway Road
101 Pivers Island Road Beaufort, NC 28516
Beaufort, NC 28516-9722
Attn: Don Hoss
Phone: [phone]
[phone]
• List of previous state or federal permits issued for work on the project tract. Include permit
numbers, permittee, and issuing dates.
NC DEHNR Permit #4-97 for Major Development in an Area of Environmental Concern.
A copy is attached.
• Checks totaling $400 made payable to the North Carolina Department of Environment,
Health, and Natural Resources (DEHNR) to cover the costs of processing.
<< Attach Check Here >>
Previously Submitted.
NOV 2 8 2001
• A signed AEC hazard notice for projects in oceanfront and inlet areas. NOT APPLICABLE
• A statement of compliance with the North Carolina Environmental Policy Act (N.C.G. S.
113A-1 to 10). If project involves the expenditure of public funds or use of public lands,
attach a statement documenting compliance with the North Carolina Environmental Policy
Act.
Expenditure of public funds will be in strict compliance with the North Carolina
Environmental Policy Act (N.C.G. S. 113A-1 to 10).
1V duel Orbach, Director
6. CERTIFICATION AND PERMISSION TO ENTER ON LAND
I understand that any permit issued in response to this application will allow only the development
described in the application. The project will be subject to conditions and restrictions contained in the
permit.
I certify that to the best of my knowledge, the proposed activity complies with the State of North
Carolina's approved Coastal Management Program and will be conducted in a manner consistent with
such program.
I certify that I am authorized to grant, and do in fact grant permission to representatives of state and
federal review agencies to enter on the aforementioned lands in connection with evaluating information
related to this permit application and follow-up monitoring of the project.
I further certify that the information provided in this application is truthful to the best of my knowledge.
This is the -1"O day of 1'14m *'11 2001.
DUKE UNIVERSITY MARINE LAB
Print Name: Mchael Orbach_ Director
Signature:
Landowner or Authorize
Attachments pertaining to the proposed project.
• DCM W-2 Excavation and Fill Information
• DCM W-4 Structures Information
Form DCM MP-2
EXCAVATION AND FILL
q1xcept'wic*s and culverts)
Attach this form to Joint Application for CAMA Major
Permit, Form DCM MP-1. Be sure to complete all
other sections of the Joint Application that relate to this
proposed project.
Describe below the purpose of proposed excavation or
fill activities. All values to be given in feet.
Average Final
Lmgth Width Existing - Project
Access
charnel
(MH.W) or
(NWL)
Boat Basin.
Boat Ramp
Rock Groin
Rock SELL
Other
(Excluding 250 ft. 0-55 ft. -5.0 ft.
0 to
Shordine 2.4 ft.
-
Stabilization)
Depth Dep1h
300 ft. Maximum
12..5 ft.

1. EXCAVATION "N/A"
a) Amount of material to be excavated from below MHW or
NWL in cubic yards
b) Type of material to be excavated
c) Does the am to be excavated include coastal wetlands
(marsh), submerged aquatic vegetation (SAVs) or other
walands: Yes No
d) High ground: excavation in cubic yards
2. DISPOSAL OF EXCAVATED MATERIAL "N/A"
a) Location of disposal area _
b) Dimensions of disposal area
c) Do you claim title to disposal area?
Yes No
If no, attach a letter granting permission from the owner.
d) Will a disposal area be available for fiture maintenance?
Yes No
If yes, where?
1EVISED 03/95
Form DCM W-2 Page 2
- NO *V 2 8 2001
e) Does the disposal area include any coastal wetlands
(marsh), SAVs or other wetlands?
Yes No
f) Does the disposal include any area m the water?
Yes No
If yes,
(1) Amount of material to be placed in the water
800 CY
(2) Dimensions of fill area
25Y Lang X 0-55 ft. wide = 5.500 SF
(3) Purpose of fill
Establish suitable depth for marsh plants.
b. Will fill material be placed in coastal wetlands
(marsh), SAVs or other wetlands?
_ Yes X No
3. SHORELINE STABALMATION
a. Type of shoreline stabilization
Bulkhead X Riprap REVETMENT
b. Length 426 ft.
c. Average distance waterward of MHW or NWL 10 ft.
d. Maximum distance waterward of MHW or NWL 10 ft.
e. Shoreline erosion during preceding 12 months
N/A REPLACING BULKHEAD
(Source of infornuldon)
f. Type of bulkhead or riprap material.
CLASS H GRANITE STONE
g. Amount of fill in cubic yards to be placed below water
level
(1) Riprap 400 CY
(2) Bulkhead backfill N/A
h. Type of fill material CLASS H GRANITE STONE
L Source of fill material QUARRY MATERIAL
4. OTHER FILL ACTIVITIES "N/A"
(Excluding Shoreline Stabilization)
a. Will fill material be brought to site?
X Yes No
If yes,
(1) Dimensions of fill area
(2) Purpose of fill
5. GMERA7
a. How will excavated or fill material be kept on site and
erosion controlled?
TURBIDITY CURTAIN AND STONE SILL ALONG
WITH MARSH PLANTS
b. Wbat type of won equipment will be used (for
example, draglne, backhoe, or hydraulic dredge)?
BACKHOE / EXCAVATOR and/or CRANE
c. Will wetlands be crossed in transporting equipment to
project site? Yes X No
If yes, explain steps that will be taken to lessen
environmental impacts.
DUKE UNIVERSITY MARINE LAB
Applicant or Project name

Signature Michael Orbach, Director
Date
Form DCM MP4
STRUCTURES
(Construction within Public Trust Areas) 2 8 2001
Attach this form to Joint Application for CAMA e. Mooring buoys "N/A"
Major Permit, Form DCM MP-1. Be sure to (1) _Commercial -Community Private
complete all other sections of the Application (2) Number
vfich relate to this proposed project. (3) Description of buoy (Color,
inscription, size, anchor, etc.)
a. Dock(s) and/or Pier(s) "N/A"
(1) _Commercial _Community. Private
(2) Number
(3) 1 Amgb (4) Width of water body
(4) Width (5) Distance buoy(s) to be placed
(5) Finger Piers _ Yes No beyond shoreline
(i) Number
(i i) Length f. Mooring structure (boatlift, mooring
(iii) Width pilings, etc.) "N/A"
(6) Platform(s) Yes _ No (1) _ Commercial -Community
(i) Number Private
(ii) Length (2) Number
(iii) Width (3) Length.
() Number of slips proposed (4) Width
(8) Proximity of structure to adjacent
riparian property lines g. Other (Give complete descrlption) "NIA"
(9) Width of water body
(10) Water depth at waterward end of
pier at MLW or NEVI.
b. Boathouse (including covered lifts) "N/A"
(1) Commercial Private
(2) Length.
(3) Width
c. Groin (e.g. wood, sheerpile, etc.) "N/A"
(1) Number
(2) Length(s)
d
STONE SILL SEE SITE PLAN
(1) Length = 300 feet
(2) Average distance from MHW =30'
(3) Maximum distance beyond MHW = 60'
DUKE UNIVERSITY MARINE LAB
Applicant or Project name

STONE REVETMENT SEE SITE PLAN
(1) Length 426 feet
(2) Average distance from MHW =10'
(3) Maximum distance beyond MHW =10'
Signature Michael` Orbach, Director
Date
Revised 03/95
Form DCM-MP-3
UPLAND
DEVELOPMENT
(Construction and/or land disturbing activities)
t. !
Attach this form to Joint Application for CAMA Major
Permit, Form DCM-MP-1. Be sure to complete all
other sections of the Joint Application that relate to this
proposed project.
a. Type and number of buil, ' gs, facilities, units or
structures proposed
h. Projects that require a CAMA Major Development
Permit may also require a Stormwater Certification.
Has a site development plan been submitted to the
Division of Environmental Management for review?
Yes
If yes, date submitted
i.
b. Number of lots or parcels
c. Density. (give the number o residential units. and the
units per acre)
k
d. Size of area to be graded, filled or disturbed
including roads, ditches, etc.
ID',< Zro, -60.600 5
If the proposed project will disturb more than one
acre of land, the Division of Land Resources must
receive an erosion and sedimentation control plan at
least 30 days before land disturbing activity begins.
If applicable, has a sedimentation and erosion
control plan been submitted to the Division of Land
Resources? Yes 0 No
If yes, date submitted
f. List the., materials (such as marl, paver stone,
asphalt, or concrete) to be.used for paved surfaces.
g. Give the percentage of Le tract within 75 feet of
MHW or NWL, or within 575 feet in the case of an
Outstanding Resource Water, to be covered by
impervious and/or built-upon surfaces, such as
pavement, buildings, rooftops, or to b sed for
vehicular driveways or parking.
Revised 03/95
No
Describe proposed method sewage disposal.
-A tA
Have the facilities described in Item i. above
received state or local approval?
(Attach appropriate documentation)
Describe location and type of propos o
waters of the state (for example, rface runo
sanitary wastewater, industrial/commerce uent,
"wash down" and residential discharges).
Describe proposed drinking water supply/source
(e.g. well, community, public syster etc / .
in. Will water be impounded? Yes LZNo
If yes, how many acres?
n. If the project is a oceanfront develo t, when
was the lot(s) platted and recorded?
Applicant or
0%uat-L/ , 36u
Date
W I C 14 ,O IL A S
School of the ENVIRONMENT
MARINE LABORATORY
November 21, 2001
NCDENR - Division of Coastal Management
151-B Highway 24
Hestron Plaza H
Morehead City, NC 28557
Attention: Mr. Charles Jones
Subject: Major CAMA Permit Application for a Shoreline Stabilization and Marsh Restoration Project
along western shoreline of Duke Marine Lab Property on Pivers Island, Carteret County, NC.
Dear Mr. Jones:
The Duke Marine Laboratory is located on Pivers Island in Carteret County, North Carolina. Currently,
there is an existing asbestos bulkhead and remnant flounder pens along the western shoreline of the
property (adjacent to Pivers Island Drive). Attached is a Joint State/ Federal Permit Application to:
1) Remove approximately 250' of degraded asbestos bulkheading and approximately 250' of
remnant asbestos wall previously used as flounder containment pens;
2) Restore approximately 0.25 acres of tidal marsh S artina alterniflora and Spartina ap tens) ;
3) Construct approximately 300' of stone sill for shoreline stabilization of upland property and
restored marsh areas;
4) Construct approximately 426' of stone revetment for stabilization of an existing degraded
bulkhead and as return wall protection; 'rj 1
5) Regrade existing upland area landward of removed bulkhead (25V) to provide upland
vegetated bank, berm and swale area for increased stormwater retention and infiltration.
During construction and restoration phases of the project, all work will be contained by a turbidity
curtain. Following guidance provided during on-site consultations with staff from NC Division of Marine
Fisheries, NC DCM, Duke Marine Laboratory, and NOAA, the project will include transplanting existing
live oysters along the length of the marsh restoration / sill area. Additional oyster cultch may be
incorporated into the project within the constructed stone revetment alignment.
The attached application follows the format of Division of Coastal Management form DCM-MP-1.
Additional supporting information is included as a part of the application. Checks totaling $400 were
previously submitted. This is Revision #1 to our November Oh Application. If you have any questions
regarding this proposed project, please do not hesitate to contact Mr. Howard Weckerle, Coordinator for
Projects and Building Maintenance for Duke Marine Lab. He can be reached at [phone].
Respectfully submitted,
Dr. Michael Orbach
Director
Duke University Marine Laboratory
Enclosure - Permit Application
135 DUKE MARINE LAB ROAD, BEAUFORT, NC 28516-9721
Development Type FEE DCM % DWQ %
(14300 1601435100093 1625 6253 24300 1602 435100095 2341
1. Private, non-commercial
development that does not involve $250 100%($250) 0%($0)
the filling or excavation of any
wetlands or open water areas:
II. Public or commercial development
that does not involve the filling or $400 100%($400) 0%($0)
excavation of any wetlands or open
water areas:
111. For development that involves the
filling and/or excavation of up to 1
acre of wetlands and/or open water
areas, determine if A, B, C. or D
below applies:
III(A). For Private, non-commercial
development, If General water Quality S250 100%($250) 0%($0)
Certification No.3301 (see attached)
can be applied:
III(B): For public or commercial
development, if General water Quality $400 100%($400) 0%($0)
Certification No.3301 (see attached)
can be applied:
III(C). If General Water Quality
Certification No. 3301 (see attached)
could be applied, but DCM staff
determined that additional review and $400 60%($240) 40%($160)
written DWQ concurrence is needed
because of concerns related to wifter
qual,
If General Water Quality
Certification No. 3301 (see attached) 00 60%($240) 40% (S160)
can of be applied:
IV. For development that involves
the filling and/or excavation of more $475 60°k ($285) 40%($190)
than one acre of wetlands and/or
open mater areas:
c
llll?l01
6o?
aT

North Carolina Department of
Division of 0
Michael F. Easley, Govemor Donna D.
December 10, 2001
MEMORANDUM:
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
Applicant:
vironment and Natural Resources
rGreg:Thorpe, Acting Director
er Quality
Doug Huggett
Major Permits Processing Coordinator
William G. Ross Jr., Smmtary
r:
(YJ A 4 9
001
©IV, OF
DIREC OR,S QUALI
OFFICE
CAMA/DREDGE & FILL Permit Application Review
Duke University' Marine Laboratory/ Dr. Michael Orbach
Project Location: Carteret County, adjacent to Beaufort Channel along the west side of the Duke
Marine Lab property on Piver's Island, off of Old Causeway Road, between
Beaufort and Morehead City.
Proposed Project: Proposes to construct a shoreline stabilization project by restoring marsh,
removing flounder pens, constructing an offshore stone sill, and protecting the
existing bulkhead with ripmp.
Please indicate below your agency's position or viewpoint on the proposed project and return this form
by December 31, 2001. If you have any questions' regarding the proposed project, please contact Tere
Barrett at [phone]. When appropriate; in-depth comments with supporting data is requested.
REPLY: This agency has no objection to the project as proposed.
This agency has no comment on the proposed project.
This agency approves of the project only if the recommended changes are
incorporated. See attached:
This agency objects to the projectfor reasons described in the attached comments.
SIGNED - DATE
151-B Hwy. 24, Hestron Plaza II, Morehead City, North Carolina 28557
Phone: [phone] FAX: X52,-247:33301 Internet http;//dcrn2.enr.state.nc.us
An Equal Opportunity 1 Affirmative Action Employer - 50% Recycled 110% Post Consumer Paper

Development Type FEE DCM % DWQ %
(14300 1601435100093 1625 6253 (243001602 435100095 2341)
1. Private, non-commercial
development that does not involve S250 100%($250) 0% (SO)
the filling or excavation of any
wetlands or open water areas:
11. Public or commercial development
that does not involve the filling or 5400 100%($400)
0% (SO)
excavation of any wetlands or open
water areas:
III. For development that involves the
filling and/or excavation of up to 1
acre of wetlands and/or open water
areas, determine if A, B, C, or D
below applies:
III(A). For Private, non-commercial
development, If General water Quality S250 100%($250) 0% (SO)
Certification No.3301 (see attached)
can be applied:
III(B): For public or commercial
development, if General water Quality 5400 100%($400) 0% ($0)
Certification No.3301 (see attached)
can be applied:
III(C). If General Water Quality
Certification No. 3301 (see attached)
could be applied, but DCM staff
determined that additional review and 5400 60%(S240) 40%($160)
written DWQ concurrence is needed '
because of concerns related to wdter
quell
If General Water Quality
Certification No. 3301 (see attached) 00 60%($240) 40% (5160)
can of be applied:
IV. For development that involves
the filling and/or excavation of more $475 60%($285) 40%($190)
than one acre of wetlands and/or
open water areas:
G-
llI l?l01
r

DIVISION OF COASTAL MANAGEMENT
FIELD INVESTIGATION REPORT
1. APPLICANT'S NAME: Duke University Marine Laboratory/Dr. Michael Orbach
2. LOCATION OF PROJECT SITE: Adjacent to Beaufort Channel along the west side of the Duke
Marin Lab property on Piver's Island, off of Old Causeway Rd. between Beaufort and Morehead City.
Photo Index - 2000: #528, grid 17 T,U 1995: #528, grid 4 V,W
State Plane Coordinates - X: 2699700 Y: 359200-600 Rover # L1 11413A
3. INVESTIGATION TYPE: CAMA/D&F
4. INVESTIGATIVE PROCEDURE: Dates of Site Visit - May 09, 2001; Nov. 14, 2001
Was Applicant Present - Yes; No
5. PROCESSING PROCEDURE: Application Received - cc: Nov. 30, 2001
Office - Morehead City
6. SITE DESCRIPTION:
(A) Local Land Use Plan - Carteret County
Land Classification From LUP - Developed/Conservation
(B) AEC(s) Involved: CS, EW, PT
(C) Water Dependent: Yes
(D) Intended Use: Private
(E) Wastewater Treatment: Existing - Beaufort municipal
Planned -None
(F) Type of Structures: Existing - Bulkhead, asbestos flounder pens
Planned - Marsh restoration project, rock sill, riprap
(G) Estimated Annual Rate of Erosion: N/A
Source - N/A
7. HABITAT DESCRIPTION: [AREA]
DRF.T)aRD FTT .T FT) 0TN1R12
(A) Vegetated Wetlands
(B) Non-Vegetated Wetlands
(C) Other - Shallow Bottom Habitat
High Ground - CS 17,110 sf
7,500 sf
(D) Total Area Disturbed: 24, 610 (.56 acre)
(E) Primary Nursery Area: No
(F) Water Classification: SA Open: No
8. PROJECT SUMMARY: Duke Marine Lab proposes to construct a shoreline stabilization project by
restoring marsh, removing flounder pens, constructing an offshore stone sill, and protecting the
existing bulkhead with riprap.
FIELD INVESTIGATION REPORT:
Duke Marine Lab
Page 02
9. NARRATIVE DESCRIPTION:
The applicant is Dr. Michael Orbach, on behalf of the Duke Marine Lab facility on Piver's Island, Carteret County.
Piver's Island is an historic fill peninsula extending southward from the Morehead/Beaufort Causeway into the waters
of Beaufort Inlet. The project tract is 14.5 acres in size, averaging +3' to +6' above sea level. The soil composition
on the property is predominantly historic spoil, and vegetation is ornamental. The western shoreline of the property is
stabilized by an asbestos bulkhead to the north, and timber and concrete walls to the south. There is a ±70' section
toward the southern end that is stabilized with marl. This area appears to have been avoided with the bulkhead for the
installation of a boat ramp, which was never constructed. The bottom composition of Beaufort Inlet in this area is
sandy, ridged, and indicative of high energy systems. The bottom is riddled with shell material, but few live shellfish,
excepting oysters on the bulkhead, pier pilings, and flounder pen. There is an existing flounder pen composed of
asbestos sheeting that is in very poor repair, and has not been used recently. The upland portion of this tract is
bordered by Piver's Island Road. The facility is serviced by Beaufort municipal water and sewer services.
The waters of Beaufort Inlet around the project site are classified SA by the Division of Water Quality. The area is
not a designated Primary Nursery Area, and is closed to the taking of shellfish for consumption. The Carteret County
Land Use Plan classifies this area of the county as Developed, with all AEC's classified as Conservation.
The proposal is for an overall shoreline stabilization project, avoiding the replacement of the vertical bulkhead walls.
The 260' of asbestos sheeting forming the flounder pens will be removed. The top portion of the northern 250' of
bulkhead wall will be removed. A rock sill, approximately 300' in length with a bottom width of 12.5' is to be
constructed offshore. This structure will begin approximately 10' - 12' off of the bulkhead of the NOAA property to
the north, extending southward and arcing around the flounder pen area. At its most waterward extent, the structure
will be 70' offshore. The sill will have a 2' top width, with 1.5:1 side slopes. The structure will be approximately
3.5' in height, extending to approximately .5' above the nhw level. It will be composed of Class 2 Granite, and will
have two "drop down" areas with 11' top and 5' bottom widths. These depression areas will have an elevation equal
to the substrate elevation of marsh growing further along the shoreline. The sill will be placed on a layer of geotextile
material to prevent settling.
The sill will end where the riprap, or revetment begins along the southern half of the existing bulkhead. The rock
revetment will extend 10' from the bulkhead, for a length of 426'. At the point where there is a 70' gap in the
bulkhead wall, the rock will "wing" landward and connect to existing marl. At the beginning point of this structure,
rock is proposed around the southern end of the NOAA bulkhead to prevent scouring. Likewise, at the southern end
of the portion of the bulkhead to be cut, there is a small section of rock to wrap the corner and prevent scouring.
Current movement along this shoreline is predominantly north/south, and consequently the applicant expects scouring.
Along the 250' stretch of shoreline at the northern end of the project, there is a marsh restoration project proposed.
The bulkhead cap will be cut, and the area landward graded from the nhw elevation to an elevation of +2.28' nhw,
for the planting of high marsh to high ground vegetation. A 10' wide shrub vegetated berm will border the eastern
edge of the marsh restoration project. Waterward of the bulkhead, clean sand will be used to begin at the nhw
elevation and grade to the rock sill at the elevation of the waterward edge of marsh growing in the same system. This
area will be vegetated with S artina alterniflora. Oysters presently in the project area will be planted along the newly
constructed rock sill.
1o. ANTICIPATED IMPACTS:
As proposed, the rock sill and revetment portion of the proposal will fill 8010 square feet of sandy shallow bottom
habitat. The marsh restoration area will fill another 9100 square feet of sandy shallow bottom area for the placement
of fill and planting of marsh species. The upland portion of the proposal will affect ±7500 square feet for the grading
to accomplish necessary elevations for the chosen high marsh and upland vegetation. The total disturbance area for
this proposal is 24,610 square feet, or .56 acres.
The rock revetment, or riprap is a traditional shoreline stabilization structure, and except for the bottom incorporation
Page 02
Duke Marine Lab
area, poses little possibility for impacts, assuming proper materials and installation. The sill offers different impact
possibilities in the areas of navigation hazard at 70' offshore, and greater difficulties for stabilizing the structure.
Using Class 2 Granite should eliminate the problem of stability. Navigation will be largely unaffected, as the channel
is located approximately 100' west of the existing flounder pens, and the sill will be located up to 15' west of the
flounder pens. The greatest potential for impacts to the estuarine system from this type of proposal comes from the
placement of unconsolidated fill material. Along a high energy shoreline such as this, the difficulties of fill
containment are greater still. The applicant has proposed to place sediment booms along the waterward side of the
project during installation to reduce the possibility of turbidity problems.
T. Barrett December 07, 2001 MmdwadCity
APPLICATION
(Follows format of Form DCM-MP-1)
1. APPLICANT
a. Landowner:
Name: Duke University Marine Laboratory
Address: 135 Duke Marine Lab Road
Beaufort, NC 28516-9721
Day Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
b. Authorized Agent: Dr. Michael Orbach
Address: same as above E-Mail: MKOQ DUKE.EDU
C. Project Name: Shoreline Stabilization and Marsh Restoration
Along Western Shoreline of Duke Marine Lab Propet
2. LOCATION OF PROPOSED PROJECT
a. County: Carteret
b. City, town, community or landmark: Beaufort, NC
c. Street Address: 135 Duke Marine Lab Road '
d Is proposed work within city limits or planning jurisdiction? YES
M 8 2001
e. Name of body of water nearest project: BeaufortInlet
N
Newport River 101
W 70 E
3. DESCRIP'T'ION AND PLANNED USE OF PROPOSED PROJECT
a. List all development activities proposed fi!'y n
• Demolition of existing Flounder Pens.
• Removal of upper portion of existing bulkhead for 250 feet.
• Construction of stone sill structure.
• Fill with sandy soil behind sill to within tidal flood range.
• Planting marsh plants in tidal flood zone and upland plants along west border line.
• Placing a stone revetment along outer face of remaining bulkhead along west border.
b. Is the proposed activity maintenance or new work?
The proposed activity is both maintenance of an existing bulkhead using stone armor facing and
creation of new stone sill and restoration of tidal marsh in lieu of rigid bulkhead where possible.
c. Will the project be for public, private or commercial use?
The project is for preservation and protection of private property.
d Give a brief description of purpose, use, methods of construction and daily operations of the project.
The existing bulkhead and flounder pens have deteriorated over time and are in need of
maintenance. The flounder pens are no longer in use. The purpose of this project is to maintain
the western shoreline of the property using constriction methods that will support and enhance
the surrounding environment. This project has two parts: 1) construction of a stone sill and
restoration of tidal marsh in the northem part and 2) construction of a stone revetment in the
southern portion.
The northern portion of the existing wall (approximately 250 lineal feet) borders deteriorated
flounder pens that extend 55 feet into tidal waters. The sandy bottom outside the pens is
approximately 4 feet below Mean High Water. A stone sill (approximately 300 lineal feet) will
be constructed around the existing flounder pens. The stone sill will be depressed to a depth
equal to the interior marsh bottom grade at a minimum spacing of every 100 feet along the sill to
allow tidal water and marine life into the enclosed marsh area. A turbidity curtain will be used
around the work area to contain silt and sediment during constriction. The asbestos sheeting and
wood bracing of the flounder pens will be removed and properly disposed of at a licensed landfill.
The concrete cap and upper section of the bulkhead will also be demolished and disposed of in
like manner. The site will then be graded behind the stone sill to create a gradual sloping bottom
ranging from Mean Sea Level Elevation at the stone sill to Mean High Water Elevation at the
existing bulkhead wall and then sloping up to meet existing ground (about 2 feet above high
water) in a distance of approximately 20 feet. Oysters lying in the path of construction will be
relocated to the base of the new stone sill. The lower marsh and upland slope will be planted with
local native species of marsh plants; an additional 10 foot apron beyond the slope will be planted
with upland plants to form a vegetative berm. See Section A for additional details.
The southern portion of the existing wall (approximately 426 lineal feet) borders the Backwaters
of Beaufort Channel which is subject to flood and ebb tidal currents. A turbidity curtain will be
used around the work area to contain silt and sediment during construction. The proposed
maintenance is to construct a stone revetment along the west side of the existing wall. Oysters
growing along the base of this wall will be relocated prior to construction of each section of
revetment. See Section B for additional details.
NUV 2 8 2001
North
Navigation Markers ( ) - - ' - - - - -
Construction of New Stone Sill
(300 lineal feet) +i
Remnant Flounder Pens to be Removed T'%"`
Depress Sill in Two Locations
• ? 250
Fill to Tidal Range / Marsh Plants *1i1
?•I w
High Marsh/Native Upland Vegetation ?'
Upland Berm (10 ft.) Native Vegetation \\\ ,.
\ AV
A 16 '
,
,
,
Transition Zone Q
From
Sill to Revetment ;
Flood
n
Backwater of
Beaufort Channel
v
Ebb
SW Corner of
Pivers Island
Scale 1" = 100 Ft.
Blda.
t236'
Undisturbed Area
20 ft. Return
- Walls
NOAA Property
Existing Bulkhead
to Remain
Stone Revetment for
Endwall Protection
Section "A"
Applies Here
Upper Wall Section
to be Removed
Stone Revetment for
Endwall Protection
New Stone Revetment
(approx. 426')
Existing Bulkhead to
150' Remain
See Section "B"
\g Concrete Wall
To Remain
Owner: Duke University
Date: November 19, 2001
Location: Pivers Island
Duke Marine Lab Site Plan
West Boundary of Property

Stone Sill
Class II Granite
Crest -0.5 Ft (MRW)
Top 2Ft Wide
Max Height = 3.5'
Max Base =12.5'
Side Slope 1.51E-1V
Geotextile below Base
NEW
1?oi( cm
Scale l" = 20 Ft
Area of Sandy Fill and Slope Regrading (Distance Varies)
Vegetative
Marsh Planting Area (Distance Vanes)
4 - - --
Oyster
\A I
r-lean Sand Fill: --:j:. I Remove Upper
I Wall Section
j Remove Sheeting- r
ExisWm Grade
j Section "A'•
r
55
0
-30
Drop-Down Area
Depress Stone Sill as shown on
sketch at the right. Depress sill
m two locations shown on the
site plan. The Depression
should follow a 1.5H:1 V slope
both down and up with a 5 foot
flat bottom at - tN F NM , -.
?q- I o
Total Depression =11 feet
r -
M11W ...__._......_.... 0.5 Ft
Es?? 2 Ft
J? ?? Yoe ? ? ? ? Stone Sill
Geotextile
Class II Granite Revetment
Crest to match top of existing Cap.
Top Width approximately 1 Ft
Base Width Varies (Max 10 Ft)
Height Varies (Max 5 Ft)
Side Slope 1.5R-1V
Geotextile below Base & along Wall
?/j I? YY??
-pia
I Scale 1" = 4 Ft.
I I
?4 Existing Wall
to Remain
Existing Grade
I
I
Section "B"
I
3A. FIELD NOTES
Summary of Field Notes taken on 9/13/01 by Tracy Skrabal, Melanie Severin and Bill Zaist
` U"0 t
Location
Pont Average
Elevation
NJ r j f 3
A -2.41 W Elul
B 0.00 MIiW
C 2.28
WEn1= Ahx E,ewhat? rme- a
L-6VV MA, K-S N
J?6 f/ ?/,. i
Water Elevation Identified by Plant Species
Spartina Altemiflora
spartina Patens
The existing wall is used as a baseline. The intersection with the north property line is station 0 + 00.
The highlighted cells indicate probable location of center of sill. Elevations are based on MHW = 0.00
Elevations at locations relative to the existing bulkhead wall. ?
Station Top of
wan Base of
wall 10' west 20' west 30' west 40' west 50' west
0-20 3.05 -3.16 -3.34 -3.74
0+00 1.82 -2.69 -2.99 -3.29 -3.74 -4.08
0+50 1.86 -2.47 -2.73 -2.86 -3.01 -3.11 -3.45
1+00 1.85
Flounder -2.33
Pen Area -3.70
Station
0+70 to 1+55 45' west 55' west 65' west
-3.90 -3.91
1+50 1.84 -1.20 -2.68 -4.55 -4.46 -3.78 4.25
2+00 1.85 -2.78 -3.28 -3.91 4.37 -4.82
2+50 1.83 -2.76 -3.64 -4.54 -5.50
3+00 1.81 -2.44 -3.74 -5.52
3+50 1.81 -2.14 -3.09 -5.47
4+00 1.84 -2.16 -3.50
4+50 1.82 -3.19 -4.49
5+00 No Wall -1.21 -3.77
5+50 No Wall -1.16
6+00 1.80 -3.29 -4.47
6+50 1.71 -3.18 -4.49 15' west
-5.17
7+00 1.85 -3.50 -4.56 -5.12
7+10 End of Project
4. LAND AND WATER CHARACTERISTICS y 20Q 1
a. Size of entire tract:
Duke Property consists of approximately 14.5 acres; however, this project only impacts 710 lineal
feet of shoreline (approximately '/z acre) along the west border of the property.
b. Size of individual lots: Not Applicable
c. Approximate elevation of tract above Mean High Water
Duke Property ranges from 3 to 6 feet above WiW.
d. Soil type and texture of tract.
The soil on site consists of medium to fine sand Most of the sand was formerly dredged from the
adjacent Beaufort Channel.
e. Vegetation on tract: Mostly mowed lawn crass with shrubs planted throu hoot.
f Man-made features on tract
The Duke Marine Laboratory and Classroom Buildings along with roads and parking areas.
g. What is the CAMA Land Use Plan land classification of the site?
C A/?9,e, t/AT ofJ r4/,/h. How is the tract zoned by local Government? University Campus

i. Is the proposed project consistent with the applicable zoning? YES
j. Hasa professional archeological assessment been done for the tract? NO
k. Is the project located in a National Registered Ffistoric District or does it involve a National Register
listed or eligible property?
NO
1. Are there wetlands on the site? VAS
m. Describe existing wastewater treatment facilities.

Beaufort City Sewer

n. Describe location and type of discharges to waters of the state. (For example: surface runoff, sanitary
wastewater, industrial/commercial effluent, "wash down" and residential discharges.)
Several Small Seawater Recirculation Lines//
S(JR.r- tG? 2vN G r-F /vl-a P 10/? I
o. Describe existing drinking water supply so ce.(
Beaufort City Water
5. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
• A copy of the deed to property is attached.
• Work Plat and cross-section views were provided in preceding pages.
• Location map is provide as part of Section 2 above.
• Stormwater Certification - Not applicable since no upland work is contemplated.
• Names and Addresses of adjacent waterfront landowners.
Name: NOAA / National Ocean Service Center Mr. Rod Hoel
for Coastal Fisheries and Habitat Research 424 Old Causeway Road
101 Pivers Island Road Beaufort, NC 28516
Beaufort, NC 28516-9722
Attn: Don Hoss
Phone: [phone] [phone]
• List of previous state or federal permits issued for work on the project tract. Include permit
numbers, permittee, and issuing dates.
NC DEHNR Permit #4-97 for Major Development in an Area of Environmental Concern.
A copy is attached.
• Checks totaling $400 made payable to the North Carolina Department of Environment,
Health, and Natural Resources (DEHNR) to cover the costs of processing.
<< Attach Check Here >>
Previously Submitted.

• A signed AEC hazard notice for projects in oceanfront and inlet areas. NOT APPLICABLE
• A statement of compliance with the North Carolina Environmental Policy Act (N.C.G. S.
113A-1 to 10). If project involves the expenditure of public funds or use of public lands,
attach a statement documenting compliance with the North Carolina Environmental Policy
Act.
Expenditure of public funds will be in strict compliance with the North Carolina
Environmental Policy Act (N.C.G. S. 113A-1 to 10).
Michael Orbach, Director
6. CERTIFICATION AND PERMISSION TO ENTER ON LAND
I understand that any permit issued in response to this application will allow only the development
described in the application. The project will be subject to conditions and restrictions contained in the
permit.
I certify that to the best of my knowledge, the proposed activity complies with the State of North
Carolina's approved Coastal Management Program and will be conducted in a manner consistent with
such program.
I certify that I am authorized to grant, and do in fact grant permission to representatives of state and
federal review agencies to enter on the aforementioned lands in connection with evaluating information
related to this permit application and follow-up monitoring of the project.
I further certify that the information provided in this application is truthful to the best of my knowledge.
This is the ZO day of 2001.
DUKE UNIVERSITY MARINE LAB
Print Name: Michael Orbach. Director
Signature:
Landowner or Authorize
Attachments pertaining to the proposed project.
• DCM W-2 Excavation and Fill Information
• DCM MP-4 Structures Information
rm DCM-MP-2
XCAVATION AND FILL
xcept bridges and culverts)
_tach this form to Joint Application for CAMA Major
;rmit, Form DCM-MP-1. Be sure to complete all
her sections of the Joint Application that relate to this
•oposed project.
--scribe below the purpose of proposed excavation or
1 activities. All values to be given in feet.
Average Final
Length Width Existing Project
zrC s
annel
HiW) or
WL)
anal
)at Basin
)at Ramp
)ck Groin
)ck SILL
her
xcluding
orehne
abilization)
Depth Depth
300 ft. Maximum
12.5 ft.
250 ft. 0-55 ft. -5.0 ft. 0 to
-2.4 ft.

1. EXCAVATION "N/A"
a) Amount of material to be excavated from below WM or
NWL in cubic yards
b) Type of material to be excavated
c) Does the area to be excavated include coastal wetlands
(marsh), submerged aquatic vegetation (SAVs) or other
wetlands: Yes No
d) I3igh ground excavation in cubic yards
2. DISPOSAL OF EXCAVATED MATERIAL, "N/A"
a) Location of disposal area
b) Dimensions of disposal area
c) Do you claim title to disposal area?
Yes No
If no, attach a letter granting permission from the owner.
d) Will a disposal area be available for future maintenance?
Yes No
If yes, where?
VISED 03/95
rm DCM MP-2
Page 2

Does the disposal area include any coastal wetlands
(marsh), SAVs or other wetlands?
Yes No
Does the disposal include any area in the water?
Yes No
If yes,
(1) Amount of material to be placed in the water
800 CY
(2) Dimensions of fill area
250' Long X 0-55 ft. wide = 5.500 SF
(3) Purpose of fill
Establish suitable death for marsh plants.
b. Will fill material be placed in coastal wetlands
(marsh), SAVs or other wetlands?
Yes X No
SHORELINE STABALIZATION
Type of shoreline stabilization
Bulldiead X Riprap REVETMENT
Length 426 ft.
Average distance waterward of MHW or NWL 10 ft.
Maximum distance waterward of MHW or NWL 10 ft.
Shoreline erosion during preceding 12 months
N/A REPLACING BULKHEAD
(Source of information)
Type of bulkhead or riprap material
CLASS II GRANITE STONE
Amount of fill in cubic yards to be placed below water
level
(1) Riprap 400 CY
(2) Bulldlead baclfill N/A
Type of fill material CLASS H GRANITE STONE
If yes,
(1) Dimensions of fill area
(2) Purpose of fill
5. GENERAL
a. How will excavated or fill material be kept on site and
erosion controlled?
TURBIDITY CURTAIN AND STONE SILL ALONG
WITH MARSH PLANTS
b. What type of construction equipment will be used (for
example, dragline, backhoe, or hydraulic dredge)?
BACKHOE / EXCAVATOR and/or CRANE
c. Will wetlands be crossed in transporting equipment to
project site? _Yes X No
If yes, explain steps that will be taken to lessen
environmental impacts.
DUKE UNIVERSITY MARINE LAB
Source of fill material QUARRY MATERIAL
OTHER FILL ACTIVITIES
(Excluding Shoreline Stabilization)
Will fill material be brought to site?
X Yes _ No
Applicant or Project name
Signature Michael Orbach, Director
\,\ '?-O -- CD 1
Date
. Form DCM MP4
STRUCTURES
(Construction within Public Trust Areas) i
Attacks this form to Joint Application for CAMA e. Mooring buoys "N/A"
Major Permit, Form DCM MP-1. Be sure to (1) -Commercial -Community Private
complete all other sections of the Application (2) Number
which relate to this proposed project. (3) Description of buoy (Color,
inscription, size, anchor, etc.)
a. Dock(s) and/or Pier(s) "N/A"
(1) -Commercial Community Private
(2) Number
(3) Length (4) Width of water body
(4) Width (5) Distance buoy(s) to be placed
(5) Finger Piers - Yes No beyond shoreline
(i) Number
(i i) Length f. Mooring structure (boadift, mooring
(iii) Width pilings, etc.) "N/A"
(6) Platform(s) -Yes - No (1) _ Commercial -Community
(i) Number Private
(ii) Length (2) Number
(iii) Width (3) Length
(7) Number of slips proposed (4) Width
(8) Proximity of structure to adjacent
riparian property lines g. Other (Give complete description) "NIA"
(9) Width of water body
(10) Water depth at waterward end of
pier at MLW or NWL
b. Boathouse (including covered lifts) "N/A"
(1) _ Commercial Private
(2) Length
(3) Width
c. Groin (e.g. wood, sheetpile, etc.) "N/A"
(1) Number
(2) Length(s)
d Breakwatff (e.g. wood; ,
STONE SILL SEE SITE PLAN
(1) Length = 300 feet
(2) Average distance from MHW =30'
(3) Maximum distance beyond MHW = 60'
DUKE UNIVERSITY MARINE LAB
Applicant or Project name

STONE REVETMENT SEE SITE PLAN
(1) Length 426 feet
(2) Average distance from MHW =10'
(3) Maximum distance beyond MHW = l0'
Signature Mic ael` Orbacb, Director

Date
Revised 03/95
Form DCM-MP-3
UPLAND
DEVELOPMENT
;Construction and/or land disturbing activities)
kttach this form to Joint Application for CAMA Major
'ermit, Form DCM-MP-1. Be sure to complete all
)ther sections of the Joint Application that relate to this
.roposed project.
Type and number of bull " gs, facilities, units or
structures proposed
Number of lots or parcels
Density (give the number o residential units and the
units per acre)
Size of area to be graded, filled or disturbed
including roads, ditches, etc.
?(??X ?S?? _ ?ofaoo 5?
If the proposed project will disturb more than one
acre of land, the Division of Land Resources must
receive an erosion and sedimentation control plan at
least 30 days before land disturbing activity begins.
If applicable, has a sedimentation and erosion
control plan been submitted to the Division of Land
Resources? Yes C? No
If yes, date submitted
List the. materials (such as marl, paver stone,
asphalt, or concrete) to beiused for paved surfaces.
Give the percentage of the tract within 75 feet of
MHW or NWL, or within 575 feet in the case of an
Outstanding Resource Water, to be covered by
impervious and/or built-upon surfaces, such as
pavement, buildings, rooftops, or to b used for
vehicular driveways or parking.
h. Projects that require a CAMA Major Development
Permit may also require a Stormwater Certification.
Has a site development plan been submitted to the
Division of Environmental Management for review?
Yes No
If yes, date submitted
i. Describe proposed method sewage disposal.
j. Have the facilities describer) in Item i. above
.received state or local approval?
(Attach appropriate documentation)
k. Describe location and type of propos o
waters of the state (for example, s rface runo
sanitary wastewater, industrial/commerce uent,
"wash down" and residential discharges).
Describe proposed drinking water supply, source
(e.g. well, community, public system etc /L-
m. Will water be impounded? Yes ?No
If yes, how many acres?
n. If the project is a oceanfront develo t, when
was the lot(s) platted and recorded?
r-V v cE LL\L6CS , r
Applicant or Proj
Signature '
Date
dsed 03/95
Nov 06 01 10:44a Duke Marine Lab 252 504 7648 P.1
Permit Class
NEW
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
Department of Envirorune_ nt;`Heaith & Natural Resources
and
C©astal Resources. Commission
e.`
X Major Development.in an Area Environmental Concern
pursuant to NTCGS I I3A-1.18
_ Excavation and/or filling pursuant to NCGS 113-229
20001
Issued to Duke University Marine Lab 203 Facilities Center Box 90166, Durham, NC 27708-0166
authorizing development in Carteret County at Taylors Creek between Pivers Island and the Town
of Beaufort , as requested in the permittee's application dated 6/19/96 including; attached workplan
drawings CP1 through CP7. dated received 6/24/96.
'I.Ns permit, issued on -- l l is subject to compliance. with the application (where consistent
with the permit), all applicable regulations, special conditions and notes set forth below. Any violation of these terms may
be subject to a fine, imprisonment or civil action; or may cause the permit to be null and void.
F
a.
Easement
1) Prior to the initiation of any drilling activities authorized by this permit, the permittee must apply
for and receive an Easemen from the Department of Administration's State Property Office. This
office may be contacted at [phone].
Excavation and Fill
2) All excavated materials will be confined above mean high water and landward of regularly or
irregularly flooded marsh behind adequate dikes or other retaining structures to prevent spillover of
solids into any marsh or surrounding waters.
(See attached sheet for Additional Conditions)
This permiCaction may be appealed by the permittee or
other qualified persons within twenty (20) days of the
issuing date. An appeal requires resolution prior to work
initiation or continuance, as the case may be.
This permit must be accessible on-site to Department
personnel when the project is inspected for compliance.
A;?y main:maw;e work or project modification not
covered hereunder requires further Departmental approval.
All work must cease when the permit expires on
December 31. 2000
In issuir.; this permit, the State of North Carolina agrees
that jour project is consistent with the North Carolina
Coastal Management Prvg-am.
Permit Number
4-97
Signed by the authority of the Secretary of DEHNR and the
Chairman of the Coastal Resources Commission.
Roger . Schecter, Director
Division of Coastal Management
This permit and its conditions are hereby accepted.
A
Signature of Permittee
f
AM, •?rIt
mini .?
NCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment, and Natural Resources
Division of Coastal Management 01182U
U
Michael F. Easley, Govemor ` Donna D. Moffitt, Director William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
December 10, 2001
MEMORANDUM:
TO: Mr. John R. Dorney
Environmental Biological Supervisor
Division of Water Quality
FROM: Doug Huggett
Major Permits Processing Coordinator - --
SUBJECT: CAMA/DREDGE & FELL Permit Application Review
Applicant: Duke University. Marine Laboratory/ Dr. Michael Orbach
Project Location: Carteret County, adjacent to Beaufort Channel along the west side of the Duke
Marine Lab property on Piver's Island, off of Old Causeway Road, between
Beaufort and Morehead City.
Proposed Project: Proposes to construct a shoreline stabilization project by restoring marsh,
removing flounder pens, constructing an offshore stone sill, and protecting the
existing bulkhead with riprap.
Please indicate below your agency's position or viewpoint on the proposed'prcject and return this form
by December 31, 2001. If you have any questions tegar`ding the proposed project, please contact Tere
Barrett at [phone]. When appropriate, 'in-depth comments with supporting data is requested.

REPLY: This agency has no objection to the project as p'ropo'sed.
This agency has no coinmont on the proposed' project.
This agency approves or 'the project ° only if the recommended changes are
incorporated. See attached:
This agency objects to the project for reasons described in the attached comments.
SIGNED DATE
13 1-13 Hwy. 24. , es on aza II; Morehead Uty, North aroma 557
Phone: [phone] FAX: 252-247=33301i16ternet4 http;1/dcm2.enr.state.nc.us
An Equal Opportunity 1 Affirmative Action' Employer = 5016: Recycled 1' 100% Post Consumer Paper

Development Type FEE DCM % DWQ %
(143001601435100093 1625 6253 (243001602 435100095 2341)
1. Private, noncommercial
development that does not involve $250 100%($250) 0%($0)
the filling or excavation of any
wetlands or open water areas:
II. Public or commercial development
that does not involve the filling or $400 100%($400) 0% (SO)
excavation of any wetlands or open
water areas:
111. For development that involves the
filling and/or excavation of up to 1
acre of wetlands and/or open water
areas, determine if A, B, C, or D
below applies:
III(A). For Private, non-commercial
development, If General water Quality S250 100%(S250) 0%($0)
Certification No.3301 (see attached)
can be applied:
III(B): For public or commercial
development, if General water Quality 5400 100%($400) 0% (SO)
Certification No.3301 (see attached)
can be applied:
III(C). If General Water Quality
Certification No. 3301 (see attached)
could be applied, but DCM staff
determined that additional review and 5400 60%(S240) 40% (5160)
written DWQ concurrence is needed '
because of concerns related to wdter
quell
If General Water Quality
Certification No. 3301 (see attached) 00 60%(S240) 40%($160)
can it tie applied:
IV. For development that involves
the filling and/or excavation of more
than one acre of wetlands and/or $475 60%($285) 40%($190)
open water areas:
ll? ?cnc`? ? cy?
c
ull?lo?
6CA
z
DIVISION OF COASTAL MANAGEMENT
FIELD INVESTIGATION REPORT
1. APPLICANT'S NAME: Duke University Marine Laboratory/Dr. Michael Orbach
2. LOCATION OF PROJECT SITE: Adjacent to Beaufort Channel along the west side of the Duke
Marin Lab property on Piver's Island, off of Old Causeway Rd. between Beaufort and Morehead City.
Photo Index - 2000: #528, grid 17 T,U 1995: #528, grid 4 V,W
State Plane Coordinates - X: 2699700 Y: 359200-600 Rover # L1 11413A
3. INVESTIGATION TYPE: CAMA/D&F
4. INVESTIGATIVE PROCEDURE: Dates of Site Visit - May 09, 2001; Nov. 14, 2001
Was Applicant Present - Yes; No
5. PROCESSING PROCEDURE: Application Received - cc: Nov. 30, 2001
Office - Morehead City
6. SITE DESCRIPTION:
(A) Local Land Use Plan - Carteret County
Land Classification From LUP - Developed/Conservation
(B) AEC(s) Involved: CS, EW, PT
(C) Water Dependent: Yes
(D) Intended Use: Private
(E) Wastewater Treatment: Existing - Beaufort municipal
Planned - None
(F) Type of Structures: Existing - Bulkhead, asbestos flounder pens
Planned - Marsh restoration project, rock sill, riprap
(G) Estimated Annual Rate of Erosion: N/A
Source - N/A
7. HABITAT DESCRIPTION: [AREA]
DREDGED FTT.T .F.T) OTNFR
(A) Vegetated Wetlands
(B) Non-Vegetated Wetlands
(C) Other - Shallow Bottom Habitat
High Ground - CS 17,110 sf
7,500 sf
(D) Total Area Disturbed: 24, 610 (.56 acre)
(E) Primary Nursery Area: No
(F) Water Classification: SA Open: No
8. PROJECT SUMMARY: Duke Marine Lab proposes to construct a shoreline stabilization project by
restoring marsh, removing flounder pens, constructing an offshore stone sill, and protecting the
existing bulkhead with riprap.
FIELD INVESTIGATION REPORT:
Duke Marine Lab
Page 02
9. NARRATIVE DESCRIPTION:

The applicant is Dr. Michael Orbach, on behalf of the Duke Marine Lab facility on Piver's Island, Carteret County.
Piver's Island is an historic fill peninsula extending southward from the Morehead/Beaufort Causeway into the waters
of Beaufort Inlet. The project tract is 14.5 acres in size, averaging +3' to +6' above sea level. The soil composition
on the property is predominantly historic spoil, and vegetation is ornamental. The western shoreline of the property is
stabilized by an asbestos bulkhead to the north, and timber and concrete walls to the south. There is a ±70' section
toward the southern end that is stabilized with marl. This area appears to have been avoided with the bulkhead for the
installation of a boat ramp, which was never constructed. The bottom composition of Beaufort Inlet in this area is
sandy, ridged, and indicative of high energy systems. The bottom is riddled with shell material, but few live shellfish,
excepting oysters on the bulkhead, pier pilings, and flounder pen. There is an existing flounder pen composed of
asbestos sheeting that is in very poor repair, and has not been used recently. The upland portion of this tract is
bordered by Piver's Island Road. The facility is serviced by Beaufort municipal water and sewer services.
The waters of Beaufort Inlet around the project site are classified SA by the Division of Water Quality. The area is
not a designated Primary Nursery Area, and is closed to the taking of shellfish for consumption. The Carteret County
Land Use Plan classifies this area of the county as Developed, with all AEC's classified as Conservation.
The proposal is for an overall shoreline stabilization project, avoiding the replacement of the vertical bulkhead walls.
The 260' of asbestos sheeting forming the flounder pens will be removed. The top portion of the northern 250' of
bulkhead wall will be removed. A rock sill, approximately 300' in length with a bottom width of 12.5' is to be
constructed offshore. This structure will begin approximately 10' - 12' off of the bulkhead of the NOAA property to
the north, extending southward and arcing around the flounder pen area. At its most waterward extent, the structure
will be 70' offshore. The sill will have a 2' top width, with 1.5:1 side slopes. The structure will be approximately
3.5' in height, extending to approximately .5' above the nhw level. It will be composed of Class 2 Granite, and will
have two "drop down" areas with 11' top and 5' bottom widths. These depression areas will have an elevation equal
to the substrate elevation of marsh growing further along the shoreline. The sill will be placed on a layer of geotextile
material to prevent settling.
The sill will end where the riprap, or revetment begins along the southern half of the existing bulkhead. The rock
revetment will extend 10' from the bulkhead, for a length of 426'. At the point where there is a 70' gap in the
bulkhead wall, the rock will "wing" landward and connect to existing marl. At the beginning point of this structure,
rock is proposed around the southern end of the NOAA bulkhead to prevent scouring. Likewise, at the southern end
of the portion of the bulkhead to be cut, there is a small section of rock to wrap the comer and prevent scouring.
Current movement along this shoreline is predominantly north/south, and consequently the applicant expects scouring.
Along the 250' stretch of shoreline at the northern end of the project, there is a marsh restoration project proposed.
The bulkhead cap will be cut, and the area landward graded from the nhw elevation to an elevation of +2.28' nhw,
for the planting of high marsh to high ground vegetation. A 10' wide shrub vegetated berm will border the eastern
edge of the marsh restoration project. Waterward of the bulkhead, clean sand will be used to begin at the nhw
elevation and grade to the rock sill at the elevation of the waterward edge of marsh growing in the same system. This
area will be vegetated with Spartina alterniflora. Oysters presently in the project area will be planted along the newly
constructed rock sill.
io. ANTICIPATED IMPACTS:
As proposed, the rock sill and revetment portion of the proposal will fill 8010 square feet of sandy shallow bottom
habitat. The marsh restoration area will fill another 9100 square feet of sandy shallow bottom area for the placement
of fill and planting of marsh species. The upland portion of the proposal will affect ±7500 square feet for the grading
to accomplish necessary elevations for the chosen high marsh and upland vegetation. The total disturbance area for
this proposal is 24,610 square feet, or .56 acres.
The rock revetment, or riprap is a traditional shoreline stabilization structure, and except for the bottom incorporation
Page 02
Duke Marine Lab
area, poses little possibility for impacts, assuming proper materials and installation. The sill offers different impact
possibilities in the areas of navigation hazard at 70' offshore, and greater difficulties for stabilizing the structure.
Using Class 2 Granite should eliminate the problem of stability. Navigation will be largely unaffected, as the channel
is located approximately 100' west of the existing flounder pens, and the sill will be located up to 15' west of the
flounder pens. The greatest potential for impacts to the estuarine system from this type of proposal comes from the
placement of unconsolidated fill material. Along a high energy shoreline such as this, the difficulties of fill
containment are greater still. The applicant has proposed to place sediment booms along the waterward side of the
project during installation to reduce the possibility of turbidity problems.
T. Barrett December 07, 2001 MoreheadCky
APPLICATION
(Follows format of Facet MM-MP-1)
1. APPLICANT
a. Landowner:
2001
Name: Duke Urriversity Marine Laboratory
Address: 135 Duke Marine Lab Road
Beaufort, NC 28516-9721
Day Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
b. Authorized Agent: Dr. Michael Orbach
Address: same as above E-Mail: MKOD-DUKE.EDU
C. ProjectName: Shoreline Stabilization and Marsh Restoration
Along Western Shoreline of Duke Marine Lab Propert
2. LOCATION OF PROPOSED PROJECT
a. County: Carteret
b. City, town, community or landmark Beaufort, NC
c. Street Address: 135 Duke Marine Lab Road
d Is proposed work within city limits or planning jurisdiction? YES
e. Name of body of water nearest project: Beaufort Inlet
1 1. N
Newport River ,61
W 70
Morehead City
Radio
Island
Duke Marine Lab S
Pivers Island
E
3. DESCRIPTION AND PLANNED USE OF PROPOSED PROJECT
a. List all development activities proposed
• Demolition of existing Flounder Pens.
• Removal of upper portion of existing bulkhead for 250 feet.
• Construction of stone sill structure.
• Fill with sandy soil behind sill to within tidal flood range.
• Planting marsb plants in tidal flood zone and upland plants along west border line.
• Placing a stone revetment along outer face of remaining bulkhead along west border.
b. Is the proposed activity maintenance or new work?
The proposed activity is both maintenance of an existing bulkhead using stone armor facing and
creation of new stone sill and restoration of tidal marsh in lieu of rigid bulkhead where possible.
c. Will the project be for public, private or commercial use?
The project is for preservation and protection of private property.
d. Give a brief, description of purpose, use, methods of construction and daily operations of the proj ect.
The existing bulkhead and flounder pens have deteriorated over time and are in need of
maintenance. The flounder pens are no longer muse. The purpose of this project is to maintain
the western shoreline of the property using construction methods that will support and enhance
the surrounding environment. This project has two parts: 1) construction of a stone sill and
restoration of tidal marsh in the northern part and 2) construction of a stone revetment in the
southern portion.
The northern portion of the existing wall (approximately 250 lineal feet) borders deteriorated
flounder pens that extend 55 feet into tidal waters. The sandy bottom outside the pens is
approximately 4 feet below Mean High Water. A stone sill (approximately 300 lineal feet) will
be constructed around the existing flounder pens. The stone sill will be depressed to a depth
equal to the interior marsh bottom grade at a minimum spacing of every 100 feet along the sill to
allow tidal water and marine life into the enclosed marsh area. A turbidity curtain will be used
around the work area to contain silt and sediment during -construction. The asbestos sheeting and
wood bracing of the flounder pens will be removed and properly disposed of at a licensed landfill.
The concrete cap and upper section of the bulkhead will also be demolished and disposed of in
like manner. The site will then be graded behind the stone sill to create a gradual sloping bottom
ranging from Mean Sea Level Elevation at the stone sill to Mean F igh Water Elevation at the
existing bulkhead wall and then sloping up to meet existing ground (about 2 feet above high
water) in a distance of approximately 20 feet. Oysters lying in the path of construction will be
relocated to the base of the new stone sill. The lower marsh and upland slope will be planted with
local native species of marsh plants; an additional 10 foot apron beyond the slope will be planted
with upland plants to form a vegetative berm. See Section A for additional details.
The southern portion of the existing wall (approximately 426 lineal feet) borders the Backwaters
of Beaufort Channel which is subject to flood and ebb tidal currents. A turbidity curtain will be
used around the work area to contain silt and sediment during construction. The proposed
maintenance is to construct a stone revetment along the west side of the existing wall. Oysters
growing along the base of this wall will be relocated prior to constriction of each section of
revetment. See Section B for additional details.

,L.
North
------- 10?
--
Markers --

Construction of New Stone Sill
(300 lineal feet)
.
......... :t..
Remnant Flounder Pens to be Removed -?*
Depress Sill in Two Locations

Fill to Tidal Range / Marsh Plants I.0I::
I I .

High Marsh/Native Upland Vegetation ..... w ;
1' • ; ??
/

Upland Berm (10 ft.) Native Vegetation

1 `
AI
NOAA Property
Existing Bulkhead
to Remain
Stone Revetment for
Endwall Protection
Section "A"
Applies Here
!5
I
Upper Wall Section
to be Removed
,
,
Transition Zone
From
Sill to Revetment
Flood
n
Backwater of
Beaufort Channel
v
Ebb
SW Corner of
Pivers Island
Scale V = 100 Ft.
Blds.
€
t2,"2 36'
'
,
Undisturbed Area
20 ft. Return
/
Walls
Stone Revetment for
Endwall Protection
New Stone Revetment
(approx. 426')
Existing Bulkhead to
150' Remain
See Section "B"
,
\g Concrete Wall
To Remain
Owner: Duke University
Date: November 19, 2001
Location: Pivers Island
Duke Marine Lab Site Plan
West Boundary of Property
C? ?nni

Stone Sill Am of Sandi' Fill and Slope Regrading (Distance Varies)
Class II Granite
Crest -0.5 Ft (MRW)
Top 2Ft Wide
Max Height = 3.5' Vegetative
Max Base =12.5' Marsh Planting Area (Distance Varies) Berm
Side Slope 1.5R- IV
- - --
Geotodile below Base
DYE
Relocation - --- --- --
MHw -
Clean Sand Fill' Remove Upper
- - - I Wall Section
??Remove Sheeting-- -
Existins Grade
I
Scale 1"= 20 Section "N'
Ft I I
55
0
-30
Drop-Down Area
Depress Stone Sill as shown on
sketch at the right. Depress sill
in two locations shown on the
site plan. The Depression
should follow a 1.5H:1 V slope
bath down and up with a 5 foot
flat bottom at - W FM . .
/? : ? I/-
Total Depression =11 feet
MHw _............... _.......... _........ _......_....._......_..._...
0.5 Ft
Es?? 2 Ft.
Jc??? Yol ? ? ?? ? Stone Sill
Geoteldile
Class II Granite Revetment
Crest to match top of existing Cap.
Top width approximately 1 Ft
Base Width Varies (Max 10 Ft)
Height Varies (Max. 5 Ft)
Side Slope 1.5R- IV
Geoted& below Base & along wall
om -
fl 30/vl ------
Scale 1" = 4 Ft
^^ ??-Existing wan ? ?(j
pp to Remain
(30 II
\ J ? Existing Grade
_ I
?Geotextile I
Section "B"
i
3A. FIELD NOTES
Summary of Field Notes taken on 9/13/01 by Tracy Skrabal, Melanie Severin and Bill Zaist
- '0017
Location
Point Average
Elevation
/' r
A -2.41 W EM
B 0.00 MHW
C 2.28
KAN = ?/Aj E?.w??,?? 666- s
LadV MA, K.S N
? f `/ ,l
J4,
Water Elevation Identified by Plant Species
Spartina Alteniflora
Spartina Patens
The existing wall is used as a baseline. The intersection with the north property line is station 0 + 00.
The highlighted cells indicate probable location of center of sill. Elevations are based on MFiW = 0.00
Elevations at locations relative to the existing bulkhead wall-
Station Top of
wall Base of
wall 10' west 20' west 30' west 40' west 50' west
0-20 3.05 -3.16 -3.34 -3.74
0+00 1.82 -2.69 -2.99 -3.29 3.74 -4.08
0+50 1.86 -2.47 -2.73 -2.86 -3.01 -3.11 -3.45
1+00 1.85
Flounder -2.33
Pen Area -3.70
Station
0+ 70 to 1+55 45' west 55' west 65' west
-3.90 -3.91
1+50 1.84 -1.20 -2.68 -4.55 -4.46 3.78 -4.25
2+00 1.85 -2.78 -3.28 -3.91 437 4.82
2+50 1.83 2.76 -3.64 -4.54 -5.50
3+00 1.81 -2.44 -3.74 -5.52
3+50 1.81 -2.14 -3.09 -5.47
4+00 1.84 -2.16 -3.50
4+50 1.82 -3.19 -4.49
5+00 No Wall -1.21 -3.77
5+50 No Wall -1.16
6+00 1.80 -3.29 -4.47
6+50 1.71 -3.18 -4.49 15' west
-5.17
7+00 1.85 -3.50 -4.56 -5.12
7+10 End of Project
4. LAND AND WATER CHARACTERISTICS
a. Size of entire tract:

Duke Property consists of approximately 14.5 acres; however, this project only impacts 710 lineal
feet of shoreline (approximately '/z acre) along the west border of the property.
b. Size of individual lots: Not Applicable
c. Approximate elevation of tract above Mean High Water
Duke Property ranges from 3 to 6 feet above M1-]W.
d Soil type and texture of tract.
The soil on site consists of medium to fine sand Most of the sand was formerly dredged from the
adjacent Beaufort Channel.
e. Vegetation on tract: Mostly mowed lawn axass with shrubs planted throughout.
f. Man-made features on tract
The Duke Marine Laboratory and Classroom Buildings along with roads and parking areas.
g. What is the CAMA Land Use Plan land classification of the site?
C A1,r6kt/A-10 N ,
h. How is the tract zoned by local Government? ?/
University Campus
i. Is the proposed project consistent with the applicable zoning? YES
j. Hasa professional archeological assessment been done for the tract? NO
k. Is the project located in a National Registered Historic District or does it involve a National Register
listed or eligible property?
NO
1. Are there wetlands on the site?
in. Describe existing wastewater treatment facilities.
Beaufort City Sewer
n. Describe location and type of discharges to waters of the state. (For example: surface runoff, sanitary
wastewater, industrial/commercial effluent, "wash down" and residential discharges.)
Several Small Seawater Recirculation Lines//
?j tJ f2 ?tG? 2v N 0 F ? /YJ'a / 1 3 0/ V 1
o. Describe existing drinking water supply so ce.(((((
Beaufort City Water
5. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
• A copy of the deed to property is attached.
• Work Plat and cross-section views were provided in preceding pages.
• Location map is provide as part of Section 2 above.

• Stormwater Certification - Not applicable since no upland work is contemplated.
• Names and Addresses of adjacent waterfront landowners.
Name: NOAA / National Ocean Service Center Mr. Rod Hoel
for Coastal Fisheries and Habitat Research 424 Old Causeway Road
101 Pivers Island Road Beaufort, NC 28516
Beaufort, NC 28516-9722
Attn: Don Hoss
Phone: [phone]
[phone]
• List of previous state or federal permits issued for work on the project tract. Include permit
numbers, permittee, and issuing dates.
NC DEHNR Permit #4-97 for Major Development in an Area of Environmental Concern.
A copy is attached.
• Checks totaling $400 made payable to the North Carolina Department of Environment,
Health, and Natural Resources (DEHNR) to cover the costs of processing.
<< Attach Check Here >>
2
Previously Submitted.
!! ?J
• A signed AEC hazard notice for projects in oceanfront and inlet areas. NOT APPLICABLE
• A statement of compliance with the North Carolina Environmental Policy Act (N.C.G. S.
113A-1 to 10). If project involves the expenditure of public funds or use of public lands,
attacks a statement documenting compliance with the North Carolina Environmental Policy
Act.
Expenditure of public funds will be in strict compliance with the North Carolina
Environmental Policy Act (N.C.G. S. 113A-1 to 10).
Michael Orbach, Director
6. CERTIFICATION AND PERMISSION TO ENTER ON LAND
I understand that any permit issued in response to this application will allow only the development
described m the application. The project will be subject to conditions and restrictions contained in the
permit.
I certify that to the best of my knowledge, the proposed activity complies with the State of North
Carolina's approved Coastal Management Program and will be conducted in a manner consistent with
such program.
I certify that I am authorized to grant, and do in fact grant permission to representatives of state and
federal review agencies to enter on the aforementioned lands in connection with evaluating information
related to this permit application and follow-up monitoring of the project.
I further certify that the information provided in this application is truthful to the best of my knowledge.
This is the -'-""4 day of N m -*42001.
DUKE UNIVERSITY MARINE LAB
Print Name: Michael Orbach. Director
Signature:
Landowner or Authonze
Attachments pertaining to the proposed project.
• DCM MP-2 Excavation and Fill Information
• DCM MP-4 Structures Information
rm DCM MP-2
XCAVATION AND FILL
xcept bridges and culverts)
.tack this form to Joint Application for CAMA Major
;rmit, Form DCM-MP-l. Be sure to complete all
her sections of the Joint Application that relate to this
oposed project.
-scn'be below the purpose of proposed excavation or
1 activities. All values to be given in feet.
Average Final
Length Width Existing Project
.cess
annel
1HW or
WL)
Inal
)at Basin
fat Ramp
)ck Groin
)ck SILL
her
xcluding
oreline
ibilization)
300 ft. I Maximum
12.5 ft.
250 ft. 1 0-55 ft. 1 -5.0 ft.
0 to
-2.4 ft.

1. EXCAVATION "N/A"
a) Amount of material to be excavated from below MHW or
NWL in cubic yards
b) Type of material to be excavated
c) Does the area to be excavated include coastal wetlands
(marsh), submerged aquatic vegetation (SAVs) or other
wetlands: Yes No
d) High ground excavation in cubic yards
2. DISPOSAL OF EXCAVATED MATERIAL ' N/A"
a) Location of disposal area
b) Dimensions of disposal area
c) Do you claim title to disposal area?
Yes No
If no, attach a letter granting permission from the owner.
d) Will a disposal area be available for future maintenance?
Yes No
If yes, where?
VISED 03/95
rm DCM-MP-2
Page 2
C U1
Does the disposal area include any coastal wetlands
(marsh), SAVs or other wetlands?
Yes No
Does the disposal include any area in the water?
Yes No
If yes,
(1) Amount of material to be placed in the water
800 CY
(2) Dimensions of fill area
25U Long X 0-55 ft. wide = 5.500 SF
(3) Purpose of fill
Establish suitable death for marsh plants.
b. Will fill material be placed in coastal wetlands
(marsh), SAVs or other wetlands?
_ Yes X No
SHORELINE STABALIZATION
Type of shoreline stabilization
Bulkhead X Riprap REVETMENT
If yes,
(1) Dimensions of fill area
(2) Purpose of fill
Length 426 ft.
Average distance waterward of MRW or NWL 10 ft.
Maximum distance waterward of MHW or NWL 10 ft.
Shoreline erosion during preceding 12 months
N/A REPLACING BULKHEAD
(Source of information)
Type of bulkhead or riprap material
CLASS II GRANITE STONE
5. GENERAL
a. How will excavated or fill material be kept on site and
erosion controlled?
TURBIDITY CURTAIN AND STONE SILL ALONG
WITH MARSH PLANTS
b. What type of construction equipmnt will be used (for
example, dragline, backhoe, or hydraulic dredge)?
BACKHOE / EXCAVATOR and/or CRANE
Amount of fill in cubic yards to be placed below water
level
(1) Riprap 400 CY
(2) Bulkhead backfill N/A
Type of fill material CLASS II GRANITE STONE
Source of fill material OUARRY MATERIAL
c. Will wetlands be crossed in transporting equipment to
project site? Yes X No
If yes, explain steps that will be taken to lessen
environmental impacts.
DUKE UNIVERSITY MARINE LAB
Applicant or Project name

OTHER FILL ACTIVITIES "N/A" Signature Michael Orbach, Director
(Excluding Shoreline Stabilization) " ,J?-O O 1
Will fill material be brought to site?
X Yes _ No
Date
Form DCM-MP4
STRUCTURES
(Construction within Public Trust Areas)
? J V
Attach this form to Joint Application for CAMA e. Mooring buoys "N/A"
Major Permit, Form DCM MP-1. Be sure to (1) -Commercial-Community Private
complete all other sections of the Application (2) Number
which relate to this proposed project: (3) Description of buoy (Color,
inscription, size, anchor, etc.)
a. Dock(s) and/or Pier(s) "N/A"
(1) -Commercial Community. Private
(2) Number
(3) Length (4) Width of water body
(4) Width (5) Distance buoy(s) to be placed
(5) Finger Piers - Yes No beyond shoreline
(i) Number
(i i) Length f. Mooring structure (boatlift, mooring
(iii) Width pilings, etc.) "N/All
(6) Platform(s) -Yes _ No (1) _ Commercial -Community
(i) Number Private
(ii) Length (2) Number
(iii) Width (3) Length
(7) Number of slips proposed (4) Width
(8) Proximity of structure to adjacent
riparian property lines g. Other (Give complete description) "N/A"
(9) Width of water body
(10) Water depth at waterward end of
pier at MLW or NWL
b. Boathouse (including covered lifts) "N/A"
(1) _ Commercial Private
(2) Length
(3) Width
c. Groin (e.g. wood, sheetpile, etc.) "N/A"
(1) Number
(2) Len(s)
d. Breakowatff (e.g. wood; ,
STONE SILL SEE SITE PLAN
(1) Leargth = 300 feet
(2) Average distance from MHW =39
(3) Maximum distance beyond MHW = 69
DUKE UNIVERSITY MARINE LAB
Applicant or Project name

STONE REVETMENT SEE SITE PLAN
(1) Length 426 feet
(2) Average distance from MW =10'
(3) Maximum distance beyond MHW = 10'
Signature Micbael`Orbach, Director

Date
Revised 03/95
Form DCM-MP-3
UPLAND
DEVELOPMENT
;Construction and/or land disturbing activities)
kttach this form to Joint Application for CAMA Major
3ermit, Form DCM-MP-1. Be sure to complete all
)ther sections of the Joint Application that relate to this
,,roposed project.
Type and number of buil. " gs, facilities, units or
structures proposed
Number of lots or parcels
Density (give the number o residential units and the
units per acre)
Size of area to be graded, filled or disturbed
including roads, ditches,. etc.
¢L'X ?S0, _ "ofaoo 5
If the proposed project will disturb more than one
acre of land, the Division of Land Resources must
receive an erosion and sedimentation control plan at
least 30 days before land disturbing activity begins.
If applicable, has a sedimentation and erosion
control plan been submitted to the Division of Land
Resources? Yes No
If yes, date submitted
List the., materials (such as marl, paver stone,
asphalt, or concrete) to be/used for paved surfaces.
Give the percentage of the tract within 75 feet of
MHW or NWL, or within 575 feet in the case of an
Outstanding Resource Water, to be covered by
impervious and/or built-upon surfaces, such as
pavement, buildings, rooftops, or to b used for
vehicular driveways or parking.
h. Projects that require a CAMA Major Development
Permit may also require a Stormwater Certification.
Has a site development plan been submitted to the
Division of Environmental Management for review?
Yes No
If yes, date submitted
i. Describe proposed method 9f sewage disposal.

j. Have the facilities described in Item i. above
.received state or local approval?
(Attach appropriate documentation)
k. Describe location and type of propos o
waters of the state (for example, s rface runo
sanitary wastewater, industrial/commerce uent,
"wash down" and residential discharges).
Describe proposed drinking water supply source
(e.g. well, community, public system etc /L,
m. Will water be impounded? Yes ?No
If yes, how many acres?
n. If the project is a oceanfront develo t, when
was the lot(s) platted and recorded?
?V v cE N?VE12s it
Applicant or Projp
i4z3G p
Date
iced 03/95
Nov 06 01 10:44a Duke Marine Lab 252 504 7648 p.l
Permit Class
NEW
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
Department of Environme_ lit; Health; & .Natural Resources
and -
Coastal Resources. Commission
4_
rMl_'
for =.,
X Major Development in an Arei.A fivhr nmental Concern
pursuant to NCGS 113A=a.l 8
_ Excavation and/or filling pursuant to NCGS 113-229
2001
iFr, 1 12
Issued to Duke University Marine Lab 203 Facilities Center Box 90166, Durham, NC 27708-0166
authorizing development in Carteret County at Taylors Creek between Pivers Island and the Town
of Beaufort as requested in the permittee's application dated 6/19/96 including attached workplan
drawings CPI through CPT dated received 6/24/96.
ibis permit, issued on N ^ "l -- Ctn , is subject to compliance with the application (where. consistent
with the permit), all applicable regulations, special conditions and notes set forth below. Any violation of these terms may
!?e subject to a fine, imprisonment or civil action; or may cause the permit to be null and void.
IF
Easement
1} Prior to the initiation of any drilling activities authorized by this permit, the permittee must apply
for and receive an Easement from the Department of Administration's State Property Office. This
office may be contacted at [phone].
Excavation and Fill
2) All excavated materials will be confined above mean high water and landward of regularly or
irregularly flooded marsh behind adequate dikes or other retaining structures to prevent spillover of
solids into any marsh or surrounding waters.
(See attached sheet for Additional Conditions)
This permit action may be appealed by the permittee or
other qualified persons within twenty (20) days of the
issuing date. An appeal requires resolution prior to work
initiation or continuance, as the case may be.
This permit must be accessible on-site to Department
personnel when the project is inspected for compliance.
A.ry mair;ena=e work or project modification not
covered hereunder requires further Departmental approval.
Alt work must cause when the permit expires on
December 31, 2000
In issuir: this permit, the State of North Carolina agrees
that jour project is consistent with the North Carolina
Coastal Management Prig : am.
Permit Number
4-97
Signed by the authority of the Secretary of DEHNR and the
Chairman of the Coastal Resources Commission.
Roger . Schecter, Director
ivision of Coastal Management
This permit and its conditions are hereby acc cptcd.
Signature of Permittee