820003_Inspection_20181221

/� -----r-------- ---"r—_-_.. __ ....j.-1-11-11 __..... v ...,..... .. .:....,uuaavaa v c 3313aaaaa.c
�n for Visit: 0 Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit: ZI U VArrival Time: '1flJ Departure Time: 1 j County: �, 7L` Region:
Farm Name: kmn? ��, (� Owner Email:
ej
Owner Name:l/� Pf�j L(J//oy j�C�+ Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: ,�/%, �"J.,�'LL A11L/i115 Title: 0&141ZN Phone:
Onsite Representative: '47,4146r Integrator• AW *1 '
y
Certified Operator: Certification Number: �M
Back-up Operator: Certification Number:
Location of Farm: Latitude: Longitude:
_= =Design Current
;Design
Current
-
Design Current
Swine :WCapacity
Pop.
s
Wet Poultry,
;Capacity
Pop
Cattle , 0
Capacity Pop
_m z
�
Wean to Finish
I
JLayer
I
Dairy Cow
Wean to Feeder
Non -La _Layer
Dairy Calf
Feeder to Finish
Dairy Heifer
Farrow to Wean
` "'.
design
Cueient
D Cow
Farrow to Feeder
DryToultry
Ca aci
Po .
Non -Dairy
Farrow to Finish
Layers
Beef Stocker
Gilts
—.Non-Layers
Beef Feeder
Boars
Pullets
Beef Brood Cow
-
x
Turkeys
`
Turk ey Poults
Other
Other
Discharmes and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWR)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWR)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page I of 3
❑ Yes 0 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
[ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
21412015 Continued

Facility Number: - D jDate of Inspection: 7
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: k/A/li 37 / ►vlt
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in): %/� �Z m_ nlr y4, &_zc,1v4
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes M No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ YesNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
waste management or closure plan? A
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWR
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes U� No ❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes [] No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes [� No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s): ,
13. Soil Type(s): % l �R 'C 6�JU�SA S
14. Do the receiving crops differ fro those designated in t e CAWMP?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
[N No
❑ NA
❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
RA No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
[] No
❑ NA
❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑ WUP ❑ Checklists ❑ Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements
❑ Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes
jq No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis
❑ Waste Transfers
❑ Weather
Code
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and I " Rainfall Inspections ❑ Sludge Survey
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
❑ Yes
1 C No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Page 2 of 3
21412015 Continued

Facility Number: - j jDate of Inspection:
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA ❑ NE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
No
YV
❑ NA ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification?
❑ Yes
P No
❑ NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency?
q
situations (u,
IzJ1017,04
any
❑ Yes [�I No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes P No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes [ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes . No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
'A' No
❑ NA
❑ NE
12, IJO-) N!? I,
�d�✓rvv r3�; eAW&LV N�X7-
11 Sl)'/L /ail/ -7SiS 1 zI'llaotS 2-0 124471416"
2-o J
�1�,Ni' //V '70,4 �. C.�`1LGL� /1(A29 CO,ILVOL-141VCL3 Z 01- -' /�/9
�
wA- 'C� 474 h S l�i� v� , �� f1 r� /�% ��1/L�j s � ,ritti`Cr 2;71 r 2, 2�j)
Reviewer/Inspector Name:
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: fi v ` - )
Page 3 of 3
Phone: 0 , ?'3?' #/ 0 ¢
Date: O 4)) 9
21412015