820445_Inspection_20181231

�� Davisaon of Water Resourees
IF&'nc�a AMW J��u�nb+er � l�� , ' � �� Q�lhv�on of Soal and Water�Cr��servatio��`� ���
a
Type of Visit: ompliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: outine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit: Arrival Time: Departure Time: j, ;/1: County: S P-,— Region:
FarmName: Seer �St? w Owner Email:
Owner Name:,/ f��u )�/a���c�/�- Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: _�/ cchaoyc. i�i" Title:
Integrator: � , ;14/ / �'%ai,
Certification Number: 1/0-31
Onsite Representative:
Certified Operator: emu_
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Latitude:
Phone:
Certification Number:
Longitude:
Desgd Current ,
Design
Current
Design °Currrent .
Swine
Cava I'o
p' p
'Wet Poult
Ca ac Po
p.y, P
Cattle Capacity i'op'' '
.
-
Wean to Finish
RLayer
Dairy Cow
Wean to Feeder
Non -Layer
Dairy Calf
Feeder to Finish
Dairy Heifer
arrow to Wean
/f€
Design
Current
Dry Cow
Farrow to Feeder
D �opitry
city'o
Non -Dairy
Farrow to Finish
Layers
Beef Stocker
Gilts
Non -Layers
Beef Feeder
Boars
Pullets
Beef Brood Cow
Turkeys
IML-
Otter _. , _. ,
�a
Turkey Poults
Other
Other
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes
ErNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWR)
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWR)
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes
[J No
❑ NA
❑ NE
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters
❑ Yes
0-lqo
❑ NA
❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page I of 3 21412015 Continued

Facility Number: - j- Date of Inspection:
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate?[Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? 2-les ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in):
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes E No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes ETNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWR
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? 'es ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes /rNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes EfNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA �l
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑-15E—
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s): z`d rr�.r �x / % �f ow—
13. Soil Type(s): —49a; r�.65
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes [:]No ❑ NA E 1
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes �No ❑ NA �E
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA E3- E
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA D-NV-
❑ Yes [:]No ❑ NA [114h
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA 011E
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check ❑ Yes [:]No ❑ NA LJ TVh
the appropriate box.
❑ WUP ❑ Checklists ❑ Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑ Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Weather Code
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections ❑ Sludge Survey
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA [�J</
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA aNE
Page 2 of 3 21412015 Continued

Facility Number: - o . "I jDate of Inspection: — -J
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes ❑ No
' 25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check ❑ Yes ❑ No
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑ Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes ❑ No
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification? ❑ Yes ❑ No
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency?
❑ NA N/E
❑ NA 0- E
❑ NA ISivE
❑ NA B-I E
❑ Yes
,[3"1qo
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
E No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
lJ O/
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
[ N
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
E No
❑ NA
❑ NE
[rYes
[:]No
❑ NA
❑ NE
�YI� 1 li `w a-vYli L / �� GvJ7y',� Gad /�� /_rt✓IYG{,i�'��j''�'
Reviewer/Inspector Name:
Reviewer/Inspector Signatui
Page 3 of 3
Phone:
Date:
21412015