090099_Inspection_20180115

74
Type of Visit: O-CotUpliance Inspection O Operation Review O Structure Evaluation O Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: tine O Complaint Follow-up O Referral O Emergency 0 Other O Denied Access
Date of Visit: Arrival Time: '.'3 Departure Time: County: Region:
Farm Name:t:� �t j7f
Owner Name:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: / Title:
Onsite Representative:
Certified Operator:
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Latitude:
Owner Email:
Phone:
Phone:
Integrator:
Certification Number:
Certification Number:
Longitude:
Design Current .-1Design Current Desurrent
twine Capacity ' 1'op, Wet Poultry Capacity 1'op Cattle Capacity `: l'op. .v
Wean to Finish
Layer
=
Dairy Cow
Wean to Feeder
Non -La er
Dairy Calf '
TM Feeder to Finish
auoza --
= -
=
.:
Dairy Heifer
Farrow to Wean
- roiltr
Design Curren
Ca achy Po
-
Dry Cow
Non-Dai
Farrow to Feeder
_`Dr
Farrow to Finish
Layers
Beef Stocker
Gilts
Non -Layers
Beef Feeder
Boars
=
Pullets
Beef Brood Cow
ILI
Turkeys
Turk e Poults
, _
r
Other
Otherkfp
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify D.WR)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWR)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters
of the State other than from a discharge?
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA E0-NE—
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
[:]No
❑ NA
©1
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
[ —E---
Page 1 of 3 21412015 Continued

Facility Number: jDate of Inspection: r—/S`-=
44
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural storm storage heavy less than
plus plus rainfall) adequate?
❑ Yes
EJNo
❑ NA
E19E
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
�E
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure
5
Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in):
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
[�E
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
D Z
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental
threat,
notify DWR
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
D-NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
[D'�1B
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
EjNE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
[—]Yes
[:]No
❑ NA
[] N
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate
Manure/Sludge into
Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside
of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s):
13. Soil Type(s):
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
E] ]�
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
[] NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑TE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
M NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
07KE
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
Q' o
❑ NA
❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
❑ Yes
EjlNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑WUP ❑Checklists ❑Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. Fj`Yes0 or ❑ NA ❑ NE
Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers [�eaiher Code
rainfall❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑'T20 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections ❑ Sludge Survey
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ffYes EYNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 21412015 Continued

Facility Number: - Date of Inspection: js=
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? 0 Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑ Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification?
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency?
Reviewer/Inspector Name:
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
❑ Yes
ErTg0
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
ED-%
❑ NA
❑ NE
[:]Yes
Q-T�o
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes Q No ❑ NA ❑ NE
[:]Yes fj­&o ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes IJ go_ ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes 0 No
[:]Yes [TNo
❑ Yes 0 o
❑NA ❑NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
Phone: gff% �ls' /
Date:
21412015
Page 3 of 3