20011725 Ver 1_COMPLETE FILE_20011127

Triage Check List
Date: -2q/ o ( - (( >??cvGt,fZ
To: RO S c e l l? Project Name_ ` ?c(
'UFRO Ken Averitte DWQ Project Number__ I z'
?WaRO Deborah Sawyer County ?u - ---
?WiRO Joanne Steenhuis
?WSRO Jennifer Frye
LARO Mike Parker
?MRO Peter Colwell
From: -Telephone (919) 733-
The file attached is being forwarded to you for your evaluation. Please call if you need
assistance.
? Stream length impacted
? Stream determination
? Wetland determination and distance to blue-line surface waters on USGW topo maps
? Minimization/avoidance issues
? Buffer Rules (Neuse, Tar-Pamilco, Catawba, Randleman)
? Pond fill
? Mitigation Ratios
? Ditching
? Are the stream and or wetland mitigation sites available and viable?
? Check drawings for accuracy
? Is the application consistent with pre-application meetings?
? Cumulative impact concerns

Comments o' ?CLCw
EK; ENGINEERING CONSULTING SERVICES, LTD.
Geotechnical * Construction Materials • Environmental
November 20, 2001 FILE Copy
Mr. Todd Tugwell, M.F.
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
6508 Falls of Neuse Road, Suite 120 011725
Raleigh, North Carolina 27615
Mr. John Dorney
NCDENR - Division of Water Quality
401 Wetlands Unit
1650 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1650
RE: Pre-Construction Notification Application and Partial NOV Response i
Fuquay Varina Sanitary Sewer Line Relocation
Wake County, Fuquay Varina, North Carolina ? 7
ECS project # T2839
Dear Sirs:
Enclosed, please find the Pre-Construction Notification Application for the above referenced
site. We estimate that the project has impacted approximately 0.17 acres of wetlands. The new
sewer line will not impact any wetlands or stream; however, a written authorization to impact
Zone II of the Neuse buffer of the on-site stream (approx. 550-linear feet/ approx. 0.07-acre
impact) is requested. 7-0
A gravity sanitary sewer line was placed on the subject property in 2001. The site was not issued t ,
a 401 or a 404 permit prior to construction. The site was issued a Notice of Violation on July 30,-?
2001 (see attached letter). Q?=) --a
This pre-construction notice is to inform you of the intent to abandon the former line and
construct a new sanitary sewer line, with the written permission of the North Carolina
Department of water quality, in Zone II of the Neuse buffer of the stream located on-site. The
purpose of this relocation is to move the current sanitary sewer line out of Zone I of the Neuse
Buffer and replant and restore all impacts made to this Zone I buffer area during the previous
construction. The replanting and restoration (restoration plan) of Zone I will be covered in a
separate letter.
During the construction of the current gravity sanitary sewer system, approximately 0.17 acre of
wetlands were disturbed. Due to the physical characteristics of the site (on-site stream, the
physical size of the site, and site topography), the only applicable place to replace the gravity
sanitary sewer line is in Zone II of the Neuse buffer area of the on-site stream.
P. O. Box 12015, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina 27709 - [phone] - FAX [phone] - www.ecslimited.com
Aberdeen, MD* Atlanta GA Austin, TX Baltimore, MD Chantilly, VA Charlotte, NC Chicago,p?'? INCi* I ??i J?TZYIC +5 "III , MD • Fredericksburg, VA
Greensboro, NC • Greenville, SC • Norfolk, VA - Research Triangle Park, NC • Richmond, VA Roano e, an Antonio, Williamsburg, VA' Wihnington, NC • Winchester, VA
*Testing Services Only
A review of the Wake County soil survey indicates that a stream is located on the west side of
the site (See Attached figures). The stream that is shown on the soils map is perennial and
appears to originate well to the south of the site. The soils map additionally shows a pond
located on the east side of the site. This pond is shown to discharge runoff ! into the westerly
located stream. Based on our site reconnaissance conducted on November 2, 2001, there is a
small overflow/discharge pipe located on the north side of the pond. ECS did not observe any
wetlands or streams located near this discharge pipe. Additionally, ECS did, not observe any
wetland or streams on, around, or associated with this on-site pond.
A review of the USGS 7.5 series topographic map of Fuquay Varina indicates that a stream is
located on the western portion of the site. This USGS map shows the strean> originating at a
pond located on the east side of the site. Based on our site reconnaissance conducted on
November 2, 2001, there is a small overflow/discharge pipe located on the north side of the
pond. ECS did not observe any wetlands or streams located near this discharge pipe.
Additionally, ECS did not observe any wetland or streams on, around, or associated with this on-
site pond.
Based on our calculations, we estimate the total amount of wetlands previously impacted by this
project is approximately 0.17 acres. The relocation and construction of the new sewer line will
not impact any wetlands or stream areas. A Nationwide Permit 12 and 401 Water Quality
certification for the existing wetland impact is required. We additionally request written
authorization to impact Zone II of the Neuse buffer (approx. 550-linear feet/ approx. 0.07-acre
impact) of the on-site stream for the construction of the new gravity sanitary sewer line.
Once the new gravity sanitary sewer line has been constructed, stable vegetation will be planted
in the Zone II area. A replanting and restoration (restoration plan) of the impacted Zone I of the
Neuse riparian buffer will be submitted under a separate letter.
In addition, we will respond to the remaining "bulleted" items in the NOV letter (dated July 30,
2001) under a separate letter.
Please feel free to contact us at [phone] if you have any questions concerniog this request
or if additional information is required. Thank you in advance for your timely consideration in
this matter.
Sincerely,
Engineering Consulting Services
Paul G. Wiesner
Staff ScientisG? ?P'E.
en?amm J. Wilson, Principal Engineer / Vice President
I: \Projects\T2000-T2999\T-2839\APP letter.doc
ENGINEERING CONSULTING SERVICES LTD.
Office Use Only:
USACE Action ID No. DWQ No. 0117
If any particular item is not applicable to this project, please enter "Not Applicab]
leaving the space blank.
I.
II.
Processing
Form Version October 2001
'.5
or "N/A" rather than
1. Check all of the approval(s) requested for this project:
0Section 404 Permit
? Section 10 Permit j
R 401 Water Quality Certification
Riparian or Watershed Buffer Rules
2. Nationwide, Regional or General Permit Number(s) Requested:
3. If this notification is solely a courtesy copy because written approval for the 401 Certification
is not required, check here: ?
I
4. If payment into the North Carolina Wetlands Restoration Program (NCWkP) is proposed for
mitigation of impacts (see section VIII - Mitigation), check here: ?
Applicant Information
1. Owner/Applicant
Name: ?.
Mailing Address:
Information
Telephone Number: o 7 `'i - Fax Number: e-, l c/ - .? }
E-mail Address:
2. Agent Information (A signed and dated copy of the Agent Authorization letter must be
attached if the Agent has signatory authority for the owner/applicant.)
Name: ?'.,,> >! !???`??-??r / j'F r
Company Affiliation: 72- r l .!
Mailing Address: J r " S . . 7,77, Telephone Number: ( I r) . a Y Fax Number: % d
E-mail Address: L?Zd. r' f ,'/T,I
/ V ;-)

Page 5 of 12
III. Project Information
9.
Attach a vicinity map clearly showing the location of the property with respect to local
landmarks such as towns, rivers, and roads. Also provide a detailed site plan showing property
boundaries and development plans in relation to surrounding properties. Both the vicinity map
and site plan must include a scale and north arrow. The specific footprints of all buildings,
impervious surfaces, or other facilities must be included. If possible, the maps and plans should
include the appropriate USGS Topographic Quad Map and NRCS Soil Survey with the property
boundaries outlined. Plan drawings, or other maps may be included at the applicant's discretion,
so long as the property is clearly defined. For administrative and distribution purposes, the
USACE requires information to be submitted on sheets no larger than 1? by 17-inch format;
however, DWQ may accept paperwork of any size. DWQ prefers ll-size construction
drawings rather than a sequential sheet version of the full-size plans. If full-size plans are
reduced to a small scale such that the final version is illegible, the applicant will be informed that
the project has been placed on hold until decipherable maps are provided.
1. Name of project: v y?? ,??/? i• 5 ?•, r1. ? y J-f- J/r 11h
2. T.I.P. Project Number or State Project Number (NCDOT Only):
3. Property Identification Number (Tax PIN): (-, 7 L/ v2 'r7
4. Location -
County: Nearest Town: y
??/
Subdivision name (include phase/lot number):
Directions to site (include road numbers, landmarks, etc.):
-? lf/??G' a! • L?. 0 00 F /"[?. ? ? ^4 S ? ci . C•;1, i ? t ; ?] ' L f"r { ?"(. . ?? ?
c3 .G N( 40 / d i(/ <? - .S S" v4r l/n i ? A/o rA ?{moo /.; ?
5. Site coordinates, if available (UTM or Lat/Long): l) T/I /7 Ton _S 5? E J %Yl
(Note - If project is linear, such as a road or utility line, attach a sheet that separately lists the
coordinates for each crossing of a distinct waterbody.)
6. Describe the existing land use or condition of the site at the time of this ap lication:
?. ?? i? . 7 !/' ! ,. /` '?r, ?- it ?/, /r i /. no f `, / r9 ,•'. r /. ? ,.,y ? ..
! /fits A CLc.L--? (r el /rr. i.• f i
7. Property size (acres):
8. Nearest body of water (stream/river/sound/ocean/lake): A 4 7cr ?. ??r elf°!?
River Basin: /V Cui C -
(Note - this must be one of North Carolina's seventeen designated major
River Basin map is available at htip://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/admin/maps/.)
ver basins. The
Page 6 of 12
10. Describe the purpose of the proposed work: C n ,,? Sf ?? f ?q a CJ ru ?.
11. List the type of equipment to be used to construct the project: i _?- ?< ZCJ Pl roc/(' . ;
12. Describe the land use in the vicinity of this project: ?l'S-
IV. Prior Project History
If jurisdictional determinations and/or permits have been requested and/or obtained for this
project (including all prior phases of the same subdivision) in the past, please explain. Include
the USACE Action ID Number, DWQ Project Number, application date, and date permits and
certifications were issued or withdrawn. Provide photocopies of previously issued permits,
certifications or other useful information. Describe previously approved wetland, stream and
buffer impacts, along with associated mitigation (where applicable). If this is a NCDOT project,
list and describe permits issued for prior segments of the same T.I.P. project, along with
construction schedules. l
T ? 'C_ S. -/ e, Uc, S , JS U .? N O {: i P .? f V. n /c. . ?r .•?'''JVK) l? J
/.r" r' .: 0.- J (-, ./,f C:) , :20C)1, J(P r -f fc •-/r ln--1 e^ee t .;e/,-
V. Future Project Plans
Are any future permit requests anticipated for this project? If so, describe the anticipated work,
and provide justification for the exclusion of this work from the current application:
VI. Proposed Impacts to Waters of the United States/Waters of the State
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
wetlands, open water, and stream channels associated with the project. The applicant must also
provide justification for these impacts in Section VII below. All proposed impacts, permanent
and temporary, must be listed herein, and must be clearly identifiable on an accompanying site
plan. All wetlands and waters, and all streams (intermittent and perennial) must be shown on a
delineation map, whether or not impacts are proposed to these systems. Wetland and stream
evaluation and delineation forms should be included as appropriate. Photographs may be
included at the applicant's discretion. If this proposed impact is strictly for wetland or stream
mitigation, list and describe the impact in Section VIII below. If additional space is needed for
listing or description, please attach a separate sheet.
Page 7 of 12
1. Wetland Impacts ?0 L/e f)G,j 46"- /)e"/ )/ ^-(
1 J/
?feV,,ouS??
J-9
Wetland Impact
Site Number
indicate on ma
Type of Impact* Area of
Impact
acres Located within
100-year Floodplain**
es/no Distance to
Nearest Stream
linear feet
Type of Wetland***
22 10 Y c-) /0 f

* List each impact separately and identify temporary impacts. Impacts include, but are not limited to: mec anized clearing, grading, fill,
excavation, flooding, ditching/drainage, etc. For dams, separately list impacts due to both structure and fl. oding.
** 100-Year floodplains are identified through the Federal Emergency Management Agency's (FEMA) Mood Insurance Rate Maps
(FIRM), or FEMA-approved local floodplain maps. Maps are available through the FEMA Map Service henter at 1.800-358-9616, or
online at haR://www.fema.gov.
*** List a wetland type that best describes wetland to be impacted (e.g., freshwater/saltwater marsh, forested wetland, beaver pond,
Carolina Bay, bog, etc.)
List the total acreage (estimated) of existing wetlands on the property:
Total area of wetland,impact%e?---Ao;_, ? 17 4C ft
-
Ire-J/
2. Stream Impacts, including all intermittent and perennial streams
* List each impact separately and identify temporary impacts. Impacts include, but are not limited to: culverts and associated rip-rap,
dams (separately list impacts due to both structure and flooding), relocation (include linear feet before and lifter, and net loss/gain),
stabilization activities (cement wall, rip-rap, crib wall, gabions, etc.), excavation, ditching/straightening, etc! If stream relocation is
proposed, plans and profiles showing the linear footprint for both the original and relocated streams must be ir4cluded.
** Stream names can be found on USGS topographic maps. If a stream has no name, list as UT (unnamed tributary) to the nearest
downstream named stream into which it flows. USGS maps are available through the USGS at 1-800i.358-9616, or online at
www.usgs.aov. Several internet sites also allow direct download and printing of USGS maps (e.j., www.tooozone.com,
www.mgpguest.com, etc.).
Stream Impact
Site Number
indicate on ma
Type of Impact* Length of
Impact
linear feet
Stream Name** Average Width
of Stream
Before Impact Perennial or
Intermittent?
leasespecify)

Cumulative impacts (linear distance in feet) to all streams on site:
i
i
Page 8 of 12
3. Open Water Impacts, including Lakes, Ponds, Estuaries, Sounds, Atlantic Ocean and any
other Water of the U.S. 'I'A
Open Water Impact
Site Number
indicate on ma
Type of Impact* Area of
Impact
acres Name of Waterbody
(if applicable) Type of Waterbody
(lake, pond, estuary, sound,
bay, ocean, etc.

* List each impact separately and identify temporary impacts. Impacts include, but are not limited to: fill, excavation, dredging,
flooding, drainage, bulkheads, etc.
4. Pond Creation
If construction of a pond is proposed, associated wetland and stream impacts should be
included above in the wetland and stream impact sections. Also, the proposed pond should
be described here and illustrated on any maps included with this application.
Pond to be created in (check all that apply): ? uplands ? stream ? wetlands
Describe the method of construction (e.g., dam/embankment, excavation, installation of
draw-down valve or spillway, etc.):
Proposed use or purpose of pond (e.g., livestock watering, irrigation, aesthetic, trout pond,
local stormwater requirement, etc.):_
Size of watershed draining to pond: Expected pond surface area:
VII. Impact Justification (Avoidance and Minimization)
Specifically describe measures taken to avoid the proposed impacts. It may be useful to provide
information related to site constraints such as topography, building ordinances, accessibility, and
financial viability of the project. The applicant may attach drawings of alternative, lower-impact
site layouts, and explain why these design options were not feasible. Also discuss how impacts
were minimized once the desired site plan was developed. If applicable, discuss construction
techniques to be followed during construction to reduce impacts.
/7de //) 1 % /?F_' -411 111,(1, / ?llC-IGI41, /!!`l oaf 7!e 5-, ??/! .srfr
/?u• 7`h r 1, -r, 1 J` ej r -1-le '<,' s " / ?r
f,

Q X--,,e C.O ,
VIII. Mitigation
DWQ - In accordance with 15A NCAC 2H .0500, mitigation may be required by the NC
Division of Water Quality for projects involving greater than or equal to one acre of impacts to
freshwater wetlands or greater than or equal to 150 linear feet of total impacts to perennial
streams.
Page 9 of 12
USACE - In accordance with the Final Notice of Issuance and Modification of Nationwide
Permits, published in the Federal Register on March 9, 2000, mitigation will be required when
necessary to ensure that adverse effects to the aquatic environment are minimal. Factors
including size and type of proposed impact and function and relative value of the impacted
aquatic resource will be considered in determining acceptability of appropriate and practicable
mitigation as proposed. Examples of mitigation that may be appropriate and practicable include,
but are not limited to: reducing the size of the project; establishing and!, maintaining wetland
and/or upland vegetated buffers to protect open waters such as streams; and replacing losses of
aquatic resource functions and values by creating, restoring, enhancing, or preserving similar
functions and values, preferable in the same watershed.
If mitigation is required for this project, a copy of the mitigation plan must] be attached in order
for USACE or DWQ to consider the application complete for processinl?g. Any application
lacking a required mitigation plan or NCWRP concurrence shall be !,placed on hold as
incomplete. An applicant may also choose to review the current guidelines fbr stream restoration
in DWQ's Draft Technical Guide for Stream Work in North Carolina, available at
http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands/strmgide.html.
Provide a brief description of the proposed mitigation plan. The description should provide
as much information as possible, including, but not limited to: site location (attach directions
and/or map, if offsite), affected stream and river basin, type and amount acreage/linear feet)
of mitigation proposed (restoration, enhancement, creation, or preservion), a plan view,
preservation mechanism (e.g., deed restrictions, conservation easement, etc.), and a
description of the current site conditions and proposed method of construction. Please attach
n cPnnrntP chPPt ifmnrP annnp is nPPAPA
.0.4 e
F G C"
2. Mitigation may also be made by payment into the North Carolina Wetlands Restoration
Program (NCWRP) with the NCWRP's written agreement. Check the box indicating that
you would like to pay into the NCWRP. Please note that payment into the. NCWRP must be
reviewed and approved before it can be used to satisfy mitigation requirements. Applicants
will be notified early in the review process by the 401/Wetlands Unit if !;payment into the
NCWRP is available as an option. For additional information regardinl the application
process for the NCWRP, check the NCWRP website at hU://h2o.enr.state.nc.tis/=/index.htm. If
use of the NCWRP is proposed, please check the appropriate box on page three and provide
the following information:
Amount of stream mitigation requested (linear feet):
Amount of buffer mitigation requested (square feet):
Amount of Riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres):
Amount of Non-riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres):
Amount of Coastal wetland mitigation requested (acres):_
Page 10 of 12
IX. Environmental Documentation (DWQ Only)
Does the project involve an expenditure of public funds or the use of public (federal/state/local)
land?
Yes ? No
If yes, does the project require preparation of an environmental document pursuant to the
requirements of the National or North Carolina Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
Note: If you are not sure whether a NEPA/SEPA document is required, call the SEPA
coordinator at [phone] to review current thresholds for environmental documentation.
Yes ? No ?
If yes, has the document review been finalized by the State Clearinghouse? If so, please attach a
copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval letter.
Yes ? No ?
X. Proposed Impacts on Riparian and Watershed Buffers (DWQ Only)
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
required state and local buffers associated with the project. The applicant must also provide
justification for these impacts in Section VII above. All proposed impacts must be listed herein,
and must be clearly identifiable on the accompanying site plan. All buffers must be shown on a
map, whether or not impacts are proposed to the buffers. Correspondence from the DWQ
Regional Office may be included as appropriate. Photographs may also be included at the
applicant's discretion.
Will the project impact protected riparian buffers identified within 15A NCAC 2B .0233
(Meuse), 15A NCAC 2B .0259 (Tar-Pamlico), 15A NCAC 2B .0250 (Randleman Rules and
Water Supply Buffer Requirements), or other (please identify. )?
Yes ? No ? If you answered "yes", provide the following information:
Identify the square feet and acreage of impact to each zone of the riparian' buffers. If buffer
mitigation is required calculate the required amount of mitigation by applying the buffer
multipliers.

Zone* Impact Multiplier Required
(square feet Miti ation
d 1 - 3
2 1.5
Total
* Zone 1 extends out 30 feet perpendicular from near bank of channel; Zone 2 extends an
additional 20 feet from the edge of Zone 1.

Page 11 of 12 I
If buffer mitigation is required, please discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (i.e., Donation
of Property, Conservation Easement, Riparian Buffer Restoration / Enhandement, Preservation or
Payment into the Riparian Buffer Restoration Fund). Please attach all appropriate information as
identified within 15A NCAC 2B .0242 or .0260. /
A ?Q/s//?rt?.h ?C /b!? ?.D i /???. D f 'T_/1 ? /?/PC ( Cl
frr?.
M.
Stormwater (DWQ Only) i
Describe impervious acreage (both existing and proposed) versus total acreage on the site.
Discuss stormwater controls proposed in order to protect surface waters and wetlands
downstream from the property.
-/b
lof'?` '5•s ). I t ., (f? Nr . ?.? 1!!c f/ `
Zoe-) In ?[{ //?7 r'i f?"? `,f {1 rti' i7r iQ /?7??+C/f A4?e
U e, C C),-rd 6 r - /'G
XII. Sewage Disposal (DWQ Only)
Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of
wastewater generated from the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
XIII. Violations (DWQ Only)
Is this site in -491ation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H.0500) or any Buffer Rules?
Yes VT_ No ?
Is this an aft -t a-fact pe it application?
Yes No
XIV. Other Circumstances (Optional):
It is the applicant's responsibility to submit the application sufficiently in advance of desired
construction dates to allow processing time for these permits. However, an applicant may
choose to list constraints associated with construction or sequencing that may impose limits on
work schedules (e.g., draw-down schedules for lakes, dates associated with Endangered and
Threatened Species, accessibility problems, or other issues outside of the applicant's control).

Applicant/Agent's Signature Date
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant is provided.);
i
Page 12 of 12 I
Sep-06-01 04:33pm From-Tricor
5EP. -05' 01 MEDi 09:07 NCDENR RRO
?bN of NMrthf?rolronmant
Raidgh Rplmons' I O?il1 s??
Mlehnl F. Faeley, Govemor
William 0. Raw seffetury
July 30, 2001
Mr. Mate Halt, CEO
Main Street Station of NC, LP
100 E Sybelia. Drive
Maitland, F132751
40T 629 6030 T-363 P.003/006 F-030
TEL:[phone]i8 P.002
et1mcr: NOTICE OF VIOLATION and
REMMMMATIONFOR MFORCSUNMT
FOR WE' LAND STANDARD VIOLATION, 1
4o1 WATER QUALrrv CERTawATION VmLATION
FUQUAY VARINA 9E1M E CMSION
WAKE COtiN`1"Y
Dear Mr. Hagle:
On tops 5, 2001, Charles Brown of the Reloigh Regional Office end Danny t3raitbl rthe Control
Ofte with the Division of Wafer Quality conducted a site visit of the sewer extcttsion t for Nero
Street Station in Fuquay Venue, North Cualma. Wedend and strum impeotc essooiated the
insWistion of the gravity sewer line wave doted during the site vidt. A file review and ussions with
Corps ofEt* were confirm that no 404 Permit (NW 12) has been issued ornotifioation p ovided to the
Corp of Engineers for this activity. As a result of these observations Regional Office staf Wso
conducted a file review. Accor4ingly, site visit sad respective review has confirmed violedons related to
the following items. (1) this pM,iect is not covered by a General 401 Water Quality C edar (3288),
(2) impacts were observed pr eseat in wetlands and to the stream, sod (3) the spy- imatdy 1500 feat of
dw Now Ripariert Buf lkc mme bad been mmvcd during the installation of the mnverlfrle,
Its L 491 w2w gnaw c
Wetland and stream disturbanoeB corresponding to mcchanizW land ele;:& .
and All ft a utility line installation wen observed. A file review indicates that U.S. Army
Corps of Engiaears (COE) has not authorized use of NW 12 or has notificadon been provided by
the Corps o[8oginewrs ft this activity. Accordingly, the review con&xned that no Prb-
combuodon Notification had been received by the Division of Water Quality for this jest and
no 401 Water Quality Certification bas been issued, not is it covered by a Guma 40 Water
Quafity Certificatioa. A 401 Water Quality CartiBcation ie required for the above boned
impacts punuent to 1SA NCAC 2H,0$00.
IOn Mall t)elvlea Confer. Relalah, NC 27BOB-IUB
An Equal Oppottunlty AfBrwwbg Action Employer
T919ph0na [phone] FAX (8!19)8714718
581E neycla4110% post-aonisumer paper
i
i
Sep-06-01 04:33pm From-Tricor
SEP. -05' 01 (WED) 09:07 NODENR RRO
Main St. Station NOV/NOIE
fags 2
407 629 5030 T-383 P.004/005 F-030
TEG:919 571 4718 P.003
Item H. Wsthpd rAma d Vie rise
Wetland didutbattoe corregwndinS to mechsaizdd land eimmg, grading, and fill for a utility
has insWlstion was observed. A file review indicates that the U.S. Army Corps of P*&wm (COB) W&
not suthorized use of NW 12 for this activity. Further, there is no ahb issued 401 We* Quality
Certification for this prgjeat. The respective placement of 811, grubbing, and ditching In wetlands
represent violatloos of the fallowing North Carolina wetland standard, which stain:
1SA r4CAC 28 .0231(b) (1) aid (5)
1) Liquids, fill or other solids or dissolved gases may not be present in amounts which may
cause adverse impacts an existing wcd and tyres;
5) Hydrological conditions necessary to support the biological and physical abaracteristics
naturally present in wetlands shall be protected to prevent adverse itolmto on:
Q The eharaieal, nutrient and dissolved oxygen mllms of the wetland;
D) The movement of aquatic lhtaa;
F) Water levels or elovations.
Iteiq M. Nense Ow SA NCAC 2B.0233 rat
Thh rule d*Wb that a 50 foot riparian (streamside) butfat zone, Zone I and Zone 11, shall consist
of stable, vegetated area that is u ndisturbcd except Soon activities and uses provided 1br in Item (6)
of the Rule. Specifically, for non electric utility lines impacts, other than perpetulicWw
gx. requim wcittem au11110d ,soar for impaft to zm 11 and impacts to zone I requires
written author=atiou and mitigatiom. Also. a the review con&med that notiHeadon wait not
provided to DWQ prior to the riparian zone impacts wd no Variance Request or laiaedcal
Alternative Request was readvad prior to the approximate 500 feet of riparian zone aawer line
impacts.
This Office requests that you respond, in writing, within 15 days of receipt of this Nodec of
Violation. Your response must address the following items:
• Please disowa your efforts to abate impacts to wetlands and written of the State.
s Plena provide an itemized estimation of the wetland impeots with in the tbotp*t of the
easem alit.
[[ Please show your construction corridor width and maintenance corridor width all your act of
plane.
?• Please clearly depict the locations and the design of each anti-seep collar, installed along this
sower liras.
• Also, planes indicate whether this sewer line includes lift stadons, any respective wetland
impacts associated with the installation of a lib station, and name of Bmgirt= tba jt styled the
plans.
Finally. please explain why you did not secure a Section 401 Water Quality Ca dfication and
detail bow you propose to primmi hums problem dram oeautring on fixture projects.'.
(a Please slowly disown your efforts and provide an accurate time whedade with dates which
L detail how hupacts to the stream and the riparian zone (stresmaide area) will be restored.
• You should provide an e90matc of the total acreage of Impact of zone I and zone II,
respectively.
l a please indicate your piano to remove the sewer line flrom, zone 1 of the ripatisr zone; and
restore the buffer zone. Specifically, it appears that the sewarline could be located outside
riparian zone, eliminating any impact. Please clearly explain why the sewer line wa? installed
in the buffer zone and whether it can be removed and the stream restored.
I= Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NO 27899-IM Telephone (91A)971.4700 pax (si9)471.4711
An Equal Opportunity Af irmadwe Action Employer 50% romclsdi111% nnal-rn....._-- ___ .
SIP-08-01 04:34pm From-Tricor 407 620 5030 T-363 P.005/005 F-030
5EP. -05' 01(WED) 09:07 NCDENR RR8 TEL:[phone] P.004
Mein St. Station NOV/NOIE
Page 3
You should detail your plans to replant and reatore all impacts to riparian zone (s restoration
Plan)-
9 If complete riparian zone and stroam restoration it not possible you obould ?lsarly a:oWlain as
to why this can't be accomplished. You should then apply for an after-tite-iiet 401 Witter
Quality Certincetion and Authorization to impact the riparian zone.
Fe In addition, the restoration plans must account for and clearly detail all impilets. Tbose
impacts not satistiiatoriiy restomd on-site at required to be mitigated at a 3:1 ratio.
• It should be noted that aadafactory riparian zone reabration requires replant of at least 2
hordwoW species and maintaining a stem denAtyhonvivorship of at leant 32 um per we at
the end 5 Yew
• Also, please provide this office with copies of any barvesting or timber sells ieoeipts and any
copies of a forest maunazemont plan.
This Office requires that violations, as detailed above, be canceled immediately. Also
plea sse note, these violations and any tgt= violations arc subject to civil penalty "sessaont of
up to $2S,000.00 per day for each violation.
Also. Pre-construction nodficadon will be required and written autlnayrixati t Imo the
Division of Water Quality will need to secured for this prgjeet if it Can not coo 1 with the
conditions so set forth in the General Cordfication (3288). Thwk you for your attchtien to this
motor. This office is considering h vva *ug an enfon mient acdon recosnrnendatkon, to the
Director ngsrding this matron. If you have any questions, please am Charles B:o*n or myself at
(919) $71-4700.
Sincerely.
Kennoth Schuster
Wster Quality Regional Supervisor
cc: RRO -DWQ
Central Of ace File copy
401 Wetland Unit -Danny Smith
Corp of 8ngincers
Division of Land Quality - John Holly
1028 Mali SOMM Cantor, Raleigh. NC a70N-1020
An Bquai opportunity AAirmotlen Action Employer
Telephones [phone] FAX (01)i71V10
s09i nayd$dNo% post agna'Mr preen
I.
DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)_
Project/S(te: Lv sr.ie, i? Ila "-"el. ••?
Appiicant/Owner: °?/ Date: 2ZZ2 / O /
Investigator: L• - )J / I?/ Co4mty; L I,./l-e
State: -No„-A
Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site? Yes No Community ID:
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation)? Yes No Transecti ID:
Is the area a potential Problem Area? Yes No Plot ID:
(it needed- awnfain en revarsa 1
VEGETATION

Dominant Plant a -
I - Stratum Indicator
1.-L , r In e,1j,-on tv 1,t? r,o' F ".t U
r
3.-AC Pr IRv hrd Ni ?
4. 1X! ,,de, a, I'wc?iCunS F`C
s.
H.
7
Dominant Plant speeiss ratum kLdbatg.
9
10
11.
12.
13.
14.
1s.
1 e. _
Pwant of Dominant Species that are 081. FACW or FAC 7 S - L
(enluding FAC-). Fr-i C
Remarks:
i

Y
_ Recorded Data (Describe in Remarks):
_ Stream. Lake, or lids Gauge
_ Aerial Photogrephe
_ other
_ No Recorded Data Amenable
Field Observations:
Depth of Surface Water:
Depth to Free Water in Pit:
Depth to Saturated Soil:
N/A (in.)
A/ J /\L'-
/-? 1 ?c ?i f (in.)
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Primary Indicators:
- Inundated
_ Saturated In Upper 12 Inches
_ Water Marks
_ Drift Lbaa
Sediment Deposits
_ Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Secondary Indicators (2 or more required):
Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 Inches
_ Water-Stained Leaves
_ Local Sol Survey Data
_ FAC-Neutral Test
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks: Al
B2

Appendix 13 Blank an Example Data Forms
f
SOILS
hJ
Mop Uhk Nome
(Series and Phase): Drainage Class:
Taiaonomy (Subgroup): Field Observations
Ccnfkm Mapped Type? Yes No
ProrY_ w QOMlotion:
Depth Matrix Color
jipgheal Horison (Munsell Mo

w I
Mottle Colors Mouts Abundance/ Toxlure, Concretions,
Munsell Maistl Sina/Cantre_at nrctura. ate.
5 - / fV6rl

"tic Sod indicators:
_ Histosol
_ Hatt Epipedon _ Concretions
_ Hgh Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
_ SuMdlo Odor _ Organic Streaking In Sandy Solo
_ Aqulo Mofaturs Regime
_ Reducing Cdnddbns _ Ltated on Local P"rkt Soils Litt
_ Listed on Ntilonal HAdc Sods List
Chroms Colors
d or Low
_ Gleye _ Other (EjgftM in Remarks)
ed
(
A
Remarks: I -e." /)O l A'r .. r Chidrrc d

Hydrophydc Vegetation Present? .( (Circle) (CIMID) -
Wedend Hydrology Presant? Yet
Hydrlc Sops present? Yes Is this Sampling Point Within a Wetland? Yes (14-0
Remarks:
1
Y/ S
.' ? o ? I _S G •, cX /l? /<.'? / G t= if ?" ? f7 5;?- , t?
Approved by HOUSACE 3192
Appendix B Blank and Example Data Forms
83
DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION'
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
Project/Site: Fy4?a, v
Applicant/Owner: '
Investigator: Cs L -/ - G , roJ n r
Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site? Yes No
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation)? Yes No
Is the area a potential Problem Area? Yes No
VEGET
1. Sttatum IndLI'L icator
L. '
2. •au,cfa,-, h?? S-fV?tr.?l,??. hoc -?
3. ?. `D S TP n Un `( 'en -e an
4._D;s-i-:'c4 ), t Sic ? . (L•?}_ t5?
s.
tl.
Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL. FACW or FAC
>Y??
Date:
County: _ I,?? Ire,
State: Al,,, A Community ID: D? _ a
Transect ID:
Plot ID:
Domino^t Plsnt?a^actes aratum
hdkatol-
to:
11.
19.
f3.
14.
Is.
Is.

Remarks:
?,
S" Cc S
_ Recorded Data (Describe in Remarks):
_ Stream. Lake, or 17da Gauge
_ Aerial Photographs
_ Other
_ No Recorded Data Available
Field Observations:
Depth of Surface Water:
Depth to Free Water in Pit:
Depth to Saturated Sop:
C, (in.)
0 5- (in.)
(in.)
Remarks: /
B2

Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Primary Indicatorti:
Inundated
z Saturated In Upper 12 Inches
- Water Marks
- OrIfE Linea
_ Sediment Deposits
_ Drains" Patterns in Wetlands
Secondary indicators (2 or more required):
_ Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 1 Inches
_ Water-Stained Leaves
_ Local SON Survey Data
_ FAC-Neutral Test
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
i
Appendix 9 Blank and Example Data Forms
f
SOILS
f J
f
Map Link Name
(Series and Phase): Drainage Class:
Taxonomy (Subgroup): Field Observations
Confkm Mapped Type? Yes No
proms Descrintk+n:
Depth Matrix Color Mottle Colors Mottle Abundance/ Texlurs, Concretions,
(Inge Harisen IMuns_ ke 11dow1_ (Mun¦all Moistl AhwContraax
Structure. ate.
C> °lb
10
r Nose l?/a? 2 ? , 1 ??. C. /s/i
P"do Sag indicators:
_ Fletosol _ Concretions
_ Hole Epipedon _ Ngh Organic Content In Surface layer In Sandy 3ogs
_ Sufl6dlo Odor _ Organic Streaking In Sandy Solis
Reduc0 Conditions s _ LkListed on ted on Wetkmi dale s Lid Plydrfc
_ Gleyed or Low Chrome Colors _ Other Sops List
(Etgtlaln in Remarks)
c /
Remarks: ??U ??? /? ?<•, . ? / 1 /1?4t i, C C ? ?Ci,-?? ? --.
l O
No
M O'?'?/?^?? //l,-/P/C' f9 b S`f. ?!//?:? n ? c? '? a U li(: C? 2' '°cd'
Hydrophytlo Vspatatlon Present? No (Clrole)
Wetland Wydrology Present? No
"rlc Soils Present? / 18 No
Remarks:
A
(Circle)
k this Sampling Point Within a Wetland? ( Ye No
/Ii e 7(-,
[. _; r ?/C . C/
Approved by HOUSACE 3/92
Appsndbx B Blank and Example Data Forms
83
4'1B
14
., . /? '' / 1 yet
• ? ? ??f?.?d10 Tl'YN?'h- ?l f ? 1 ? ._ y//??}J' ?i' y' ?`1.C "?.?.
1400)
ii 5 ,(?i1? Imo-. n?r??l-? ?r"! /1 r, 'ti i t.,'•? ,r? '?,1
- / l? J ?° t i "A?' • F 'gyn. I.''
II dl
Yr .?'I i / i .. Mf... ,C^.rw?lU? / • h 1 ?rw.,.?. s. Jf
071
{' .,? r ..:? (;auntry. G??•? ti ? _. ? ter-
+? ?? 1 •,? ..fit `µ !'} ry - __c-:- ??-:??, I ?1 °y. ,.+?'e itt
i ?, ly% / rf 1 J Jr
'HM 4'4 2 f
v 'Par.k
ti/? - ,., W H lir?I. t - - ` .iL1 ??J?y'•°" J?•e ." r? 3 : ? ('.. i ? I 1 1 ,1` .
C?l? ???^- 'ya,J/ ? ? ??,y'',•+y.` ?r _. t • ,,,,Fr ' • .t. ! ? \t I ? l y 1? ? Y??
C-?7??/,?' I I I' . f . : ' ? ,? ? ? ?`•?n `?'S;Y " 1 ?j?? 4,.s. ?' ? ? 1 i • j? f 1 I t? ...1 "? ' ?' `y'• ,
•../• 1.? yl ?1` !n ,te•.•, »?-;.i -:.:>w, tfn . • r' t Ali 1 l'\ __ ?± "•\ /-- n :;;;
--\?G ?• I' (I ?{` ;7?'Jl/'?`'W r M7r?"-? ?. (?,. .? fJ? ly ? ?. !f L. ? ,'?, _•,al`?,?-,..
.tea ? Ir'. +1''? y -y?`_-•T- -tl ? .__ sr't'v
? auk 1 1 y .:
U ??..?
Ai Irk . •yi? 1 qtc, / LJ J tY K
r ? = _.a,1?+'+, :' y',??jl + '> ? . ? Y ? •t I, ? ? 1 v ?`' ; J w,?I,t 5 ' ? ?•r { i1 ! i
INV
I' S 1 l w - } k ?'.
y4 l:'J i:15r ' rl`T,I, r•./J.!. s. y$.••(?F/ 1?7r ,If. -u'
Aly
? ? ? ?I? ,y 1. ??.I? y ?
A" A
?J •, ??.1???? y ???1'? r. • ' _ c . 1? • ' •I I?IMMJUh 11? ? . ?.>.f??l ? ?' `?: 1 t ? ?.. r''II( ' y y'y, t
?I.. ?. ..,.?? ` ?t* F ,t?? ? •?1? *..' _.}?,, ?.-} °,?..,??Y ' ? -? ,411 y "?
SCALE = 1" 2,000' L . `.I'
Engineering Vicinity Map
Consulting USGS Topographic Map: Fuquay Varina Quadrangle FIGURE NO.
Services, 1
1-td. ECS Project No.
Fuquay Varina Sanitary Sewer Property
T2839

SPECIFICATIONS FOR SEDIMENT CONTROL AND BUFFER RESTORATION
FOR THE FUQUAY VARINA SEWER OUTFALL PROJECT
FUQUAY VARINA,WAKE COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
PREPARED FOR:
TOWN OF FUQUAY VARINA
C/O MAIN STREET STATION LIMITED PARTNERSHIP LLC
100 EAST SYBELIA AVE.
SUITE 225
MAITLAND, FLA 32751
PREPARED BY:
ENGINEERING CONSULTING SERVICES, LTD.
POST OFFICE BOX 12015
RESEARCH TRIANGLE PARK, NORTH CAROLINA 27709
ECS, LTD. PROJECT NUMBER 2839-A.
December 14, 2001

SPECIFICATIONS FOR SEDIMENT CONTROL AND BUFFER RESTORATION
FOR THE FUQUAY VARINA SEWER OUTFALL PROJECT
FUQUAY VARINA,WAKE COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
PREPARED FOR:
TOWN OF FUQUAY VARINA
C/O MAIN STREET STATION LIMITED PARTNERSHIP! LLC
100 EAST SYBELIA AVE.
SUITE 225
MAITLAND, FLA 32751
PREPARED BY:
ENGINEERING CONSULTING SERVICES, LTD.
POST OFFICE BOX 12015
RESEARCH TRIANGLE PARK, NORTH CAROLINA 27709
A?ZH CARp?
ESS?
SVAL
10361
may,, F?'C? 11E'??' Sow

BENJAMIN V. WILSON, P.E.
NC REGISTRATION # 10361
ECS, LTD. PROJECT NUMBER 2839-A
December 14, 2001

' SEDIMENT CONTROL AND STABILIZATION SEQUENCE AND SPECIFICATIONS
FOR OUTFALL PIPE RELOCATION,
1
AND RESTORATION OF BUFFER ZONE PLANTS
SEWER OUTFALL, FUOUAY VARINA, NC - ECS PROJECT # 2839-A

' PART 1: SEDIlVIENT CONTROL CONSTRUCTION PROCEDURES AND SPECIFICATIONS
' Construction Procedures shall be as follows:
' 1. Since the project is constructed in a live drainage, erosion control measures are an integral part of
the construction sequence. The overall approach is to place the horizontal spillway pipe and
complete the project foundation as early as possible. Then water from the upstream drainage can
be safely passed through the construction area via the pipe.
' 2. The first phase of construction will be the layout of the project and sediment control structures by
the surveyor with review by ECS, Ltd. Install sediment fences as shown on the sediment and
' erosion control plan.
3. Project Construction:
' The relocated sewer outfall shall be constructed as shown on the plans by Freeland and
Kauffman.
' The abandonment of the existing sewer line will be accomplished by removing the tops of the
manholes and backfilling the bottom of the manholes with lean concrete to 6" above the sewer
' pipe. In addition 3 hydraulic barriers will be installed by excavating and removing a section of the
pipe and filling the bottom of the excavation immediately to 6" above the pipe with lean concrete
as shown on the plan. After 48 hours the excavation will be backfilled with on site
wetlands/bottomlands soils (see specifications for compaction). Placement of fill in the
' excavations should then continue until the elevation of the fill is brought', to the existing the
existing grade.
' 4. The restoration of the existing outfall easement may be performed existing outfall is abandoned.
5. Sediment control measures should be maintained in the project area until stabilization of area is
' completed.

l

C

1

PART 2: SPECIFICATIONS FOR BACK FILL
All procedures will be observed by an experienced geotechnician working under the direct supervision of
a registered, geotechnical engineer familiar with project design and construction.i. No material will be
placed in any section of the project embankment until the stripped, excavated surface has been approved
by the geotechnician.
No fill material will be placed unless it has been approved and tested in the lab by the engineer.
The proposed fill material will be tested prior to placement in accordance with ASTM D-698-A, Moisture
Density Relationship of Soils, using a 5.5 pound hammer with a 12.0 inch drop, Standard Proctor Method.
Fill material will be placed in lifts not to exceed 12.0 inches in loose thickness and will be compacted
using the backhoe bucket or other approved means.
The fill will be compacted to a least 90% of the maximum dry density as determined by ASTM D-698-A
and the moisture content at the optimum moisture, +/- 5%.
The inspector will make field moisture density tests in accordance with ASTM D-2167, D-1557, D-2922,
or other approved means.
PART 3: LANDSCAPING SEOUENCE AND SPECIFICATIONS
The landscaping sequence will be as follows:
1. Temporary stabilization of all disturbed areas to be performed within 72 hours of final grade.
2. The aquatic planting window is from April 1 to June 15.
3. Reconfirm planting one week prior to planting.
4. The planting area at the site should be staked and flagged prior to planting.
5. Area should be harrowed or tilled prior to planting.
6. Plant and stabilize the disturbed area of stream bank first, then work outward planting remaining trees
and shrubs. Seed grass last.
7. Mulch and water stock as needed
8. Inspect landscape twice per year and report survival rate to NCDENR/DWQ.
9. Reinforce planting at end of first and second growing season.
10. Restrict mowing to designated areas.
11. Suppress weeds, and vines on trees and shrubs during years 2 and 3.
Zone A: Stream Bank
Species Quantity Size
Silky Dogwood 10 1" B&B
Tulip Poplar 10 1" B&B
Elder Berry 25 Container
Black Willow 25 1" B&B
Shad Bush 20 1" B&B

Zone 1: 30 Ft. Primarv Buffer

Species Quantity Size
Tall fescue 100 lbs/acre H droseed
Willow Oak 20 1" B&B
Spice Bush 10 Container
Tulip Poplar 20 1" B&B
Loblolly Pine 10 Seedling
Silky Dogwood 10 1" B&B
Zone 2: 20 Ft. Secondary Buffer
S ecies Quantity Size
Tall fescue 100 lbs/acre H droseed
Loblolly Pine 80 Seedling,
Silky Dogwood 20 1" B&B
PART 4: PHYSICAL MONITORING PLAN
Stream Restoration/Mitigation Success Criteria----NC Division of Water Quality,
Duration of the Monitoring: Shall be 5 years from end of construction (channel modifications and
vegetation planted)-based on the fact of a 1.4-1.7 year bankfull return period.
Reporting Period for the Monitoring. Three monitoring reports shall be issued (1 st , 3 rd , 5 th years)
Monitoring Reports sent at end of yearly monitoring period to USACOE and NCDWQ 401-Wetlands
group.
Monitoring OF STREAM VEGETATION SHALL INCLUDE:
-Monitoring shall begin once Riparian buffer zones are established and shall be
quarterly for the first year but reporting shall be yearly.
-Zones are planted with native vegetation based on reference stream vegetation.
-Survival must be 320 stems/acre for trees after five years in accordance with the plans. All replanting
shall be performed in accordance with the plans and specifications.

i
SPECIFICATIONS FOR SEDIMENT CONTROL AND BUFFER RESTORATION
FOR THE FUQUAY VARINA SEWER OUTFALL PROJECT
FUQUAY VARINA,WAKE COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
PREPARED FOR:
TOWN OF FUQUAY VARINA
C/O MAIN STREET STATION LIMITED PARTNERSHIP LLC
100 EAST SYBELIA AVE.
SUITE 225
MAITLAND, FLA 32751
PREPARED BY:
ENGINEERING CONSULTING SERVICES, LTD.
POST OFFICE BOX 12015
RESEARCH TRIANGLE PARK, NORTH CAROLINA 27709
ECS, LTD. PROJECT NUMBER 2839-A
December 14, 2001

SPECIFICATIONS FOR SEDIMENT CONTROL AND BUFFER RESTORATION
FOR THE FUQUAY VARINA SEWER OUTFALL PROJECT
FUQUAY VARINA,WAKE COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
PREPARED FOR:
TOWN OF FUQUAY VARINA
C/O MAIN STREET STATION LIMITED PARTNERSHIP LLC
100 EAST SYBELIA AVE.
SUITE 225
MAITLAND, FLA 32751
PREPARED BY:
ENGINEERING CONSULTING SERVICES, LTD.
POST OFFICE BOX 12015
RESEARCH TRIANGLE PARK, NORTH CAROLINA 27709
o 4GA«kp ry?? .
SEAL • ' I?
10361
BENJAMIN V. WILSON, P.E.
NC REGISTRATION # 10361
ECS, LTD. PROJECT NUMBER 2839-A
December 14, 2001

J

SEDIMENT CONTROL AND STABILIZATION SEQUENCE ANDjSPECIFICATIONS
FOR OUTFALL PIPE RELOCATION,
AND RESTORATION OF BUFFER ZONE PLAN'S
SEWER OUTFALL, FUOUAY VARINA. NC - ECS PROJEgT # 2839-A
PART 1: SEDIMENT CONTROL CONSTRUCTION PROCEDURES AND $EECIFICATIONS
Construction Procedures shall be as follows:
1. Since the project is constructed in a live drainage, erosion control measures are an integral part of
the construction sequence. The overall approach is to place the horizontal spillway pipe and
complete the project foundation as early as possible. Then water from the upstream drainage can
be safely passed through the construction area via the pipe.
2. The first phase of construction will be the layout of the project and sediment control structures by
the surveyor with review by ECS, Ltd. Install sediment fences as shown' on the sediment and
erosion control plan.
Project Construction:

The relocated sewer outfall shall be constructed as shown on the plates by Freeland and
Kauffman.
The abandonment of the existing sewer line will be accomplished by removing the tops of the
manholes and backfilling the bottom of the manholes with lean concrete to 6" above the sewer
pipe. In addition 3 hydraulic barriers will be installed by excavating and removing a section of the
pipe and filling the bottom of the excavation immediately to 6" above the pipe with lean concrete
as shown on the plan. After 48 hours the excavation will be backfilled with on site
wetlands/bottomlands soils (see specifications for compaction). Placement of fill in the
excavations should then continue until the elevation of the fill is brought' to the existing the
existing grade.
The restoration of the existing outfall easement may be performed existing oudall is abandoned.
Sediment control measures should be maintained in the project area until stabilization of area is
completed.

I

1

PART 2: SPECIFICATIONS FOR BACK FILL
All procedures will be observed by an experienced geotechnician working under the direct supervision of
a registered, geotechnical engineer familiar with project design and construction. No material will be
placed in any section of the project embankment until the stripped, excavated surface has been approved
by the geotechnician.
No fill material will be placed unless it has been approved and tested in the lab by the engineer.
The proposed fill material will be tested prior to placement in accordance with ASTM D-698-A, Moisture
Density Relationship of Soils, using a 5.5 pound hammer with a 12.0 inch drop, Standard Proctor Method.
Fill material will be placed in lifts not to exceed 12.0 inches in loose thickness and will be compacted
using the backhoe bucket or other approved means.
The fill will be compacted to a least 90% of the maximum dry density as determined by ASTM D-698-A
and the moisture content at the optimum moisture, +/- 5%.
The inspector will make field moisture density tests in accordance with ASTM D-2167, D-1557, D-2922,
or other approved means.
PART 3: LANDSCAPING SEOUENCE AND SPECIFICATIONS
The landscaping sequence will be as follows:
1. Temporary stabilization of all disturbed areas to be performed within 72 hours of final grade.
2. The aquatic planting window is from April 1 to June 15.
3. Reconfirm planting one week prior to planting.
4. The planting area at the site should be staked and flagged prior to planting.
5. Area should be harrowed or tilled prior to planting
6. Plant and stabilize the disturbed area of stream bank first, then work outward planting remaining trees
and shrubs. Seed grass last.
7. Mulch and water stock as needed
8. Inspect landscape twice per year and report survival rate to NCDENR/DWQ.
9. Reinforce planting at end of first and second growing season.
10. Restrict mowing to designated areas.
11. Suppress weeds, and vines on trees and shrubs during years 2 and 3.
Zone A: Stream Bank
Species Quantity Size
Silky Dogwood 10 1" B&B
Tulip Poplar 10 1" B&B
Elder Ben-y 25 Container
Black Willow 25 1" B&B
Shad Bush 20 1" B&B

0

Zone 1: 30 Ft. Primarv Buffer
Species Quantity Size
Tall fescue 1001bs/acre H droseed
Willow Oak 20 1" B&B
Spice Bush 10 Container
Tulip Poplar 20 1" B&B
Loblolly Pine 10 Seedling
Silky Dogwood 10 1" B&B
Zone 2: 20 Ft. Secondarv Buffer
Species Quantity Size
Tall fescue 100 lbs/acre H droseed
Loblolly Pine 80 Seedling
Silky Dogwood 20 1" B&B
PART 4: PHYSICAL MONITORING PLAN
Stream Restoration/Mitigation Success Criteria----NC Division of Water Quality
' Duration of the Monitoring: Shall be 5 years from end of construction (channel modifications and
vegetation planted)-based on the fact of a 1.4-1.7 year bankfull return period.
Reporting Period for the Monitoring: Three monitoring reports shall be issued (1 st , 3 rd , 5 th years)
' Monitoring Reports sent at end of yearly monitoring period to USACOE and NCDWQ 401-Wetlands
group.
Monitoring OF STREAM VEGETATION SHALL INCLUDE:
-Monitoring shall begin once Riparian buffer zones are established and shall be
quarterly for the first year but reporting shall be yearly.
-Zones are planted with native vegetation based on reference stream vegetation.
-Survival must be 320 stems/acre for trees after five years in accordance with the plans. All replanting
' shall be performed in accordance with the plans and specifications.

SPECIFICATIONS FOR SEDIMENT CONTROL AND BUFFER RESTORATION
FOR THE FUQUAY VARINA SEWER OUTFALL PROJECT
FUQUAY VARINA,WAKE COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
PREPARED FOR:
TOWN OF FUQUAY VARINA
C/O MAIN STREET STATION LIMITED PARTNERSHIP LLC
100 EAST Sl?'BELIA AVE.
SUITE 225
MAITLAND, FLA 32751
PREPARED BY:
ENGINEERING CONSULTING SERVICES, LTD.
POST OFFICE BOX 12015
RESEARCH TRIANGLE PARK, NORTH CAROLINA 27709
ECS, LTD. PROJECT NUMBER 2839-A
December 14, 2001
SPECIFICATIONS FOR SEDIMENT CONTROL AND BUFFER R19STORATION
FOR THE FUQUAY VARINA SEWER OUTFALL PROJECT
FUQUAY VARINA,WAKE COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
' PREPARED FOR:
TOWN OF FUQUAY VARINA
C/O MAIN STREET STATION LIMITED PARTNERSHIP LLC
' 100 EAST SYBELIA AVE.
SUITE 225
' MAITLAND, FLA 32751
PREPARED BY:
ENGINEERING CONSULTING SERVICES, LTD.
POST OFFICE BOX 12015
' RESEARCH TRIANGLE PARK, NORTH CAROLINA 27709
' •Mg11•tfgt?
CARp?N?
?-
SL'AL
10361 ?? r3lJ
1
BENJAMIN V. WILSON, P.E.
' NC REGISTRATION # 10361
ECS, LTD. PROJECT NUMBER 2839-A
December 14, 2001
I

SEDIMENT CONTROL AND STABILIZATION SEQUENCE AND SPECIFICATIONS
' FOR OUTFALL PIPE RELOCATION,
AND RESTORATION OF BUFFER ZONE PLANTS
SEWER OUTFALL, FUQUAY VARINA, NC - ECS PROJECT # 2839-A

PART 1: SEDIMENT CONTROL CONSTRUCTION PROCEDURES AND SPECIFICATIONS
Construction Procedures shall be as follows:
1. Since the project is constructed in a live drainage, erosion control measures are an integral part of
the construction sequence. The overall approach is to place the horizontal spillway pipe and
complete the project foundation as early as possible. Then water from the upstream drainage can
be safely passed through the construction area via the pipe.
'
2. The first phase of construction will be the layout of the project and sediment control structures by
the surveyor with review by ECS, Ltd. Install sediment fences as shown on the sediment and
' erosion control plan.
3. Project Construction:
' The relocated sewer outfall shall be constructed as shown on the plans by Freeland and
Kauffman.
The abandonment of the existing sewer line will be accomplished by removing the tops of the
manholes and backfilling the bottom of the manholes with lean concrete to 6" above the sewer

A pipe. In addition 3 hydraulic barriers will be installed by excavating and removing a section of the
pipe and filling the bottom of the excavation immediately to 6" above the pipe with lean concrete
as shown on the plan. After 48 hours the excavation will be backfilled with on site
wetlands/bottomlands soils (see specifications for compaction). Placerient of fill in the
excavations should then continue until the elevation of the fill is brought, to the existing the
existing grade.
1 4. The restoration of the existing outfall easement may be performed existing outfall is abandoned.
5. Sediment control measures should be maintained in the project area until stabilization of area is
completed.

1

1

PART 2: SPECIFICATIONS FOR BACK FILL
All procedures will be observed by an experienced geotechnician working under the diprect supervision of
a registered, geotechnical engineer familiar with project design and construction. No material will be
placed in any section of the project embankment until the stripped, excavated surface has been approved
by the geotechnician.
No fill material will be placed unless it has been approved and tested in the lab by the engineer.
The proposed fill material will be tested prior to placement in accordance with ASTM D-698-A, Moisture
Density Relationship of Soils, using a 5.5 pound hammer with a 12.0 inch drop, Standard Proctor Method.
Fill material will be placed in lifts not to exceed 12.0 inches in loose thickness and will be compacted
using the backhoe bucket or other approved means.
The fill will be compacted to a least 90% of the maximum dry density as determined by ASTM D-698-A
and the moisture content at the optimum moisture, +/- 5%.
The inspector will make field moisture density tests in accordance with ASTM D-2167, D-1557, D-2922,
or other approved means.
PART 3: LANDSCAPING SEOUENCE AND SPECIFICATIONS
The landscaping sequence will be as follows:
1. Temporary stabilization of all disturbed areas to be performed within 72 hours of final grade.
2. The aquatic planting window is from April 1 to June 15.
3. Reconfirm planting one week prior to planting.
4. The planting area at the site should be staked and flagged prior to planting.
5. Area should be harrowed or tilled prior to planting
6. Plant and stabilize the disturbed area of stream bank first, then work outward planting remaining trees
and shrubs. Seed grass last.
7. Mulch and water stock as needed
8. Inspect landscape twice per year and report survival rate to NCDENR/DWQ.
9. Reinforce planting at end of first and second growing season.
10. Restrict mowing to designated areas.
11. Suppress weeds, and vines on trees and shrubs during years 2 and 3.
Zone A: Stream Bank
Species Quantity Size
Silky Dogwood 10 1" B&B
Tulip Poplar 10 1" B&B
Elder Berry 25 Container
Black Willow 25 1" B&B
Shad Bush 20 1" B&B

1
1
1
1
1
1
1
Zone 1: 30 Ft. Primary Buffer
Species Quantity Size
Tall fescue 100 lbs/acre H droseed
Willow Oak 20 1" B&B
Spice Bush 10 Container
Tulip Poplar 20 1" B&B
Loblolly Pine 10 Seedling
Silky Dogwood 10 1" B&B
Zone 2: 20 Ft. Secondarv Buffer
Species Quantity Size
Tall fescue 100 lbs/acre H droseed
Loblolly Pine 80 Seedling
Silky Dogwood 20 1" B&B
PART 4: PHYSICAL MONITORING PLAN
Stream Restoration/Mitigation Success Criteria----NC Division of Water Quality
Duration of the Monitoring: Shall be 5 years from end of construction (channel modifications and
vegetation planted)-based on the fact of a 1.4-1.7 year bankfull return period.
Reporting Period for the Monitoring: Three monitoring reports shall be issued (1 st , 3 rd , 5 th years)
Monitoring Reports sent at end of yearly monitoring period to USACOE and NCI?WQ 401-Wetlands
group.
Monitoring OF STREAM VEGETATION SHALL INCLUDE:
-Monitoring shall begin once Riparian buffer zones are established and shall be
quarterly for the first year but reporting shall be yearly.
-Zones are planted with native vegetation based on reference stream vegetation.
-Survival must be 320 stems/acre for trees after five years in accordance with the plans. All replanting
shall be performed in accordance with the plans and specifications.

SPECIFICATIONS FOR SEDIMENT CONTROL AND BUFFER RESTORATION
FOR THE FUQUAY VARINA SEWER OUTFALL PROJECT
FUQUAY VARINA,WAKE COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
PREPARED FOR:
TOWN OF FUQUAY VARINA
C/O MAIN STREET STATION LIMITED PARTNERSHIP LLC
100 EAST S'YBELIA AVE.
SUITE 225
MAITLAND, FLA 32751
PREPARED BY:
ENGINEERING CONSULTING SERVICES, LTD.
POST OFFICE BOX 12015
RESEARCH TRIANGLE PARK, NORTH CAROLINA 27709
ECS, LTD. PROJECT NUMBER 2839-A
December 14, 2001

SPECIFICATIONS FOR SEDIMENT CONTROL AND BUFFER RESTORATION
FOR THE FUQUAY VARINA SEWER OUTFALL PROJECT
FUQUAY VARINA,WAKE COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
PREPARED FOR:
TOWN OF FUQUAY VARINA
C/O MAIN STREET STATION LIMITED PARTNERSHIP LLC
100 EAST SYBELIA AVE.
SUITE 225
MAITLAND, FLA 32751
PREPARED BY:
ENGINEERING CONSULTING SERVICES, LTD.
POST OFFICE BOX 12015
RESEARCH TRIANGLE PARK, NORTH CAROLINA 27709

BENJAMIN V. WILSON, P.E.
NC REGISTRATION # 10361
ECS, LTD. PROJECT NUMBER 2839-A
December 14, 2001

' SEDIMENT CONTROL AND STABILIZATION SEQUENCE AND SPECIFICATIONS
' FOR OUTFALL PIPE RELOCATION,
AND RESTORATION OF BUFFER ZONE PLANTS

SEWER OUTFALL, FUQUAY VARINA, NC - ECS PROJECT # x839-A

PART 1: SEDIMENT CONTROL CONSTRUCTION PROCEDURES AND SPECIFICATIONS
r Construction Procedures shall be as follows:
' 1. Since the project is constructed in a live drainage, erosion control measures are an integral part of
the construction sequence. The overall approach is to place the horizontal spillway pipe and
complete the project foundation as early as possible. Then water from the upstream drainage can

' be safely passed through the construction area via the pipe.
2. The first phase of construction will be the layout of the project and sediment control structures by
the surveyor with review by ECS, Ltd. Install sediment fences as shown on the sediment and
erosion control plan.
3. Project Construction:
The relocated sewer outfall shall be constructed as shown on the plans by Freeland and
Kauffman.
' The abandonment of the existing sewer line will be accomplished by removing the tops of the
manholes and backfilling the bottom of the manholes with lean concrete to 6" above the sewer
pipe. In addition 3 hydraulic barriers will be installed by excavating and removing a section of the
pipe and filling the bottom of the excavation immediately to 6" above the pipe with lean concrete
as shown on the plan. After 48 hours the excavation will be backfilled with on site
wetlands/bottomlands soils (see specifications for compaction). Placement of fill in the
' excavations should then continue until the elevation of the fill is brought to the existing the
existing grade.
' 4. The restoration of the existing outfall easement may be performed existing outfall is abandoned.
5. Sediment control measures should be maintained in the project area until stabilization of area is
' completed.

1

?J

PART 2: SPECIFICATIONS FOR BACK FILL
All procedures will be observed by an experienced geotechnician working under the direct supervision of
a registered, geotechnical engineer familiar with project design and construction. Np material will be
placed in any section of the project embankment until the stripped, excavated surface has been approved
by the geotechnician.
No fill material will be placed unless it has been approved and tested in the lab by the engineer.
The proposed fill material will be tested prior to placement in accordance with ASTM D-698-A, Moisture
Density Relationship of Soils, using a 5.5 pound hammer with a 12.0 inch drop, Standard Proctor Method.
Fill material will be placed in lifts not to exceed 12.0 inches in loose thickness and will be compacted
using the backhoe bucket or other approved means.
The fill will be compacted to a least 90% of the maximum dry density as determined by ASTM D-698-A
and the moisture content at the optimum moisture, +/- 5%.
The inspector will make field moisture density tests in accordance with ASTM D-2167, D-1557, D-2922,
or other approved means.
PART 3: LANDSCAPING SEOUENCE AND SPECIFICATIONS
The landscaping sequence will be as follows:
1. Temporary stabilization of all disturbed areas to be performed within 72 hours of final grade.
2. The aquatic planting window is from April 1 to June 15.
3. Reconfirm planting one week prior to planting.
4. The planting area at the site should be staked and flagged prior to planting.
5. Area should be harrowed or tilled prior to planting
6. Plant and stabilize the disturbed area of stream bank first, then work outward planting remaining trees
and shrubs. Seed grass last.
7. Mulch and water stock as needed
8. Inspect landscape twice per year and report survival rate to NCDENR/DWQ.
9. Reinforce planting at end of first and second growing season.
10. Restrict mowing to designated areas.
11. Suppress weeds, and vines on trees and shrubs during years 2 and 3.
Zone A: Stream Bank
Species Quantity Size
Silky Dogwood 10 1" B&B
Tulip Poplar 10 1" B&B
Elder Berry 25 Container
Black Willow 25 1" B&B
Shad Bush 20 1" B&B

1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
Zone 1: 30 Ft. Primarv Buffer
Species Quantity Size
Tall fescue 100 lbs/acre H droseed
Willow Oak 20 1" B&B
Spice Bush 10 Container
Tulip Poplar 20 1" B&B
Loblolly Pine 10 Seedling
Silky Dogwood 10 1" B&B
Zone 2: 20 Ft. Secondarv Buffer
Species Quantity Size
Tall fescue 1001bs7acre H droseed
Loblolly Pine 80 Seedling
Silky Dogwood 20 1" B&B
PART 4: PHYSICAL MONITORING PLAN
Stream Restoration/Mitigation Success Criteria----NC Division of Water Quality
Duration of the Monitoring: Shall be 5 years from end of construction (channel modifications and
vegetation planted)-based on the fact of a 1.4-1.7 year bankfull return period.
Reporting Period for the Monitoring: Three monitoring reports shall be issued (1 st3 rd , 5 th years)
Monitoring Reports sent at end of yearly monitoring period to USACOE and NCDWQ 401-Wetlands
group.
Monitoring OF STREAM VEGETATION SHALL INCLUDE:
-Monitoring shall begin once Riparian buffer zones are established and shall be
quarterly for the first year but reporting shall be yearly.
-Zones are planted with native vegetation based on reference stream vegetation.
-Survival must be 320 stems/acre for trees after five years in accordance with the plans. All replanting
shall be performed in accordance with the plans and specifications.
MEMORANDUM
TO: John Dorney
Non-Discharge Branch
Regional Contact: Charles Brown
WO Supervisor: Ken Schuster
Date:
SUBJECT: WETLAND STAFF REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS
Facility Name Fuquay-Varina Sewer relocation County WAKE
Project Number 01 1725 County2
Recvd From APP Region Raleigh
Received Date 11/27/01 Recvd By Region
Project Type sewer line violation
Certificates Stream
Permit Wetland Wetland Wetland Stream Class Acres Feet
Type Type Impact Score Index Prim. Supp. Basin Req. Req.
12 F_ O ?' OO N ?- 27-43-15-8 FB NSW 30,403. ? I -
Mitigation Wetland
MitigationType Type Acres Feet
Is Wetland Rating Sheet Attached? Q Y 0 N Did you request more info? 0 Y 0 N
Have Project Changes/Conditions Been Discussed With Applicant? 0 Y 0 N
Is Mitigation required? 0 Y 0 N Recommendation: 0 Issue O Issue/fond 0 Deny
Provided by Region: Latitude (ddmmss)
Longitude (ddmmss)
Comments:
They need to provide a detailed buffer restoration plan for the disturbance of zone one and also need
a certification that the line is abandoned and a letter detailing what was done to remove the line.
cc: Regional Office
Central Office Page Number 1
December 17, 2001
Memo
To: John Dorney
CA-
From: Danny Smith?j' ???
Subject: Fuquay-Varian Sewer relocation
-Meuse Buffer - Wake Co. - ?J
C 01-1725,)
- I have conducted several site visits and disc}rssed this project with RRO and Bob Zarzecki. The
Fuquay Varian Sanitary Sewer Line Relodation project is proposed as a solution to the installation of a
sewer line in Zone I of the Buffer. T1116 new sewer line is proposed to be located in Zone 2 and the old
sewer line abandoned. Impacts te II are allowable due to issues with wetlands, adjacent pond
dam-toe, and property owner/ - Accordingly, Zone I is p0posed to be restored as detailed in the December 14, 2001 restoration plan
prepared by Engineefydg Consulting Services, LTD. The restoration plan is adequate; however, the
RO is still aytsidereg forwarding an Enforcement Action recommendation.
- Please i ue PMR autt rization
1
danny \_,

SPECIFICATIONS FOR SEDIMENT CONTROL AND BUFFER RESTORATION
FOR THE FUQUAY VARINA SEWER OUTFALL PROJECT
FUQUAY VARINA,WAKE COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
PREPARED FOR:
TOWN OF FUQUAY VARINA
C/O MAIN STREET STATION LIMITED PARTNERSHIP LLC
100 EAST SYBELIA AVE.
SUITE 225
MAITLAND, FLA 32751
PREPARED BY:
ENGINEERING CONSULTING SERVICES, LTD.
POST OFFICE BOX 12015
RESEARCH TRIANGLE PARK, NORTH CAROLINA 27709
ECS, LTD. PROJECT NUMBER 2839-A
December 14, 2001

i
SPECIFICATIONS FOR SEDIMENT CONTROL AND BUFFER RESTORATION
FOR THE FUQUAY VARINA SEWER OUTFALL PROJECT
FUQUAY VARINA,WAKE COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
PREPARED FOR:
TOWN OF FUQUAY VARINA
C/O MAIN STREET STATION LIMITED PARTNERSHIP LLC
100 EAST SYBELIA AVE.
SUITE 225
MAITLAND, FLA 32751
PREPARED BY:
ENGINEERING CONSULTING SERVICES, LTD.
POST OFFICE BOX 12015
RESEARCH TRIANGLE PARK, NORTH CAROLINA 277,09
,Mrtt?ttq,?
?ZH CARp?
SEAL
10361 ?2 3 l?
44'
BENJAMIN V. WILSON, P.E.
NC REGISTRATION # 10361
ECS, LTD. PROJECT NUMBER 2839-A
December 14, 2001

SEDIMENT CONTROL AND STABILIZATION SEQUENCE AND SPECIFICATIONS
FOR OUTFALL PIPE RELOCATION,
AND RESTORATION OF BUFFER ZONE PLANTS
SEWER OUTFALL, FUQUAY VARINA, NC - ECS PROJECT #2839-A
PART 1: SEDIMENT CONTROL CONSTRUCTION PROCEDURES AND SPECIFICATIONS
Construction Procedures shall be as follows:
1. Since the project is constructed in a live drainage, erosion control measures are an integral part of
the construction sequence. The overall approach is to place the horizontal spillway pipe and
complete the project foundation as early as possible. Then water from the upstream drainage can
be safely passed through the construction area via the pipe.
2.
3
4
5.
The first phase of construction will be the layout of the project and sediment control structures by
the surveyor with review by ECS, Ltd. Install sediment fences as shown on the sediment and
erosion control plan.
Project Construction:
The relocated sewer outfall shall be constructed as shown on the plans by Freeland and
Kauffman.
The abandonment of the existing sewer line will be accomplished by removing the tops of the
manholes and backfilling the bottom of the manholes with lean concrete to 6" above the sewer
pipe. In addition 3 hydraulic barriers will be installed by excavating and removing a section of the
pipe and filling the bottom of the excavation immediately to 6" above the pipe with lean concrete
as shown on the plan. After 48 hours the excavation will be backflled with on site
wetlands/bottomlands soils (see specifications for compaction). Placement of fill in the
excavations should then continue until the elevation of the fill is brought to the existing the
existing grade.
The restoration of the existing outfall easement may be performed existing outfall is abandoned.
Sediment control measures should be maintained in the project area until stabilization of area is
completed.

1I

I

PART 2: SPECIFICATIONS FOR BACK FILL
All procedures will be observed by an experienced geotechnician working under the direct supervision of
a registered, geotechnical engineer familiar with project design and construction. No material will be
placed in any section of the project embankment until the stripped, excavated surface has been approved
by the geotechnician.
No fill material will be placed unless it has been approved and tested in the lab by the!engineer.
The proposed fill material will be tested prior to placement in accordance with ASTM D-698-A, Moisture
Density Relationship of Soils, using a 5.5 pound hammer with a 12.0 inch drop, Standard Proctor Method.
Fill material will be placed in lifts not to exceed 12.0 inches in loose thickness and will be compacted
using the backhoe bucket or other approved means.
The fill will be compacted to a least 90% of the maximum dry density as determined by ASTM D-698-A
and the moisture content at the optimum moisture, +/- 5%.
The inspector will make field moisture density tests in accordance with ASTM D-2167, D-1557, D-2922,
or other approved means.
PART 3: LANDSCAPING SEQUENCE AND SPECIFICATIONS
The landscaping sequence will be as follows:
1. Temporary stabilization of all disturbed areas to be performed within 72 hours of final grade.
2. The aquatic planting window is from April 1 to June 15.
3. Reconfirm planting one week prior to planting.
4. The planting area at the site should be staked and flagged prior to planting.
5. Area should be harrowed or tilled prior to planting:,
6. Plant and stabilize the disturbed area of stream bank first, then work outward planting remaining trees
and shrubs. Seed grass last.
7. Mulch and water stock as needed
8. Inspect landscape twice per year and report survival rate to NCDENR/DWQ.
9. Reinforce planting at end of first and second growing season.
10. Restrict mowing to designated areas.
11. Suppress weeds, and vines on trees and shrubs during years 2 and 3.
Zone A: Stream Bank
Species Quantity Size
Silky Dogwood 10 1" B&B
Tulip Poplar 10 1" B&B
Elder Berry 25 Container
Black Willow 25 1" B&B
Shad Bush 20 1" B&B

t
Zone 1: 30 Ft. Primarv Buffer
Species Quantity Size
Tall fescue 100 lbs/acre H droseed
Willow Oak 20 1" B&B
Spice Bush 10 Container
Tulip Poplar 20 1" B&B
Loblolly Pine 10 Seedlin
Silky Dogwood 10 1" B&B
Zone 2: 20 Ft. Secondarv Buffer
Species Quantity Size
Tall fescue 100 lbs/acre H droseed
Loblolly Pine 80 Seedling
Silky Dogwood 20 -
1" B&B
PART 4: PHYSICAL MONITORING PLAN
Stream Restoration/Mitigation Success Criteria----NC Division of Water Quality
Duration of the Monitoring: Shall be 5 years from end of construction (channel modifications and
vegetation planted)-based on the fact of a 1.4-1.7 year bankfull return period.
Reporting Period for the Monitoring: Three monitoring reports shall be issued (1 st , 3 rd , 5 th years)
Monitoring Reports sent at end of yearly monitoring period to USACOE and NCDWQ 401-Wetlands
group.
Monitoring OF STREAM VEGETATION SHALL INCLUDE:
-Monitoring shall begin once Riparian buffer zones are established and shall be
quarterly for the first year but reporting shall be yearly.
-Zones are planted with native vegetation based on reference stream vegetation.
-Survival must be 320 stems/acre for trees after five years in accordance with the plans. All replanting
shall be performed in accordance with the plans and specifications.
o?GF W ATF9OG
Michael F. Easley
Governor
William G. Ross, Jr., Secretary
Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Kerr T. Stevens
Division of Water Quality
December 21, 2001
DWQ Project # 011725
Wake
Mr. Marc Hagle, CEO
Main Street Station of NC, LP
100 E Sybelia Drive
Maitland, Fl 32751
Re: Fuquay Varina Sanitary Sewer Line Relocation
and riparian restoration
APPROVAL of 401 Water Quality Certification and AUTHORIZATION CERTIFICATE per the Neuse River Buffer
Protection Rules (15A NCAC 2B.0233) with ADDITIONAL CONDITIONS
Dear Sirs
You have our approval, in accordance with the attached conditions, to place fill within 0.17 acres of wetlands and disturb 0.08
acres of protected riparian buffers for the purpose of constructing the sewer line, as described within your application dated November
20, 2001 with additional information provided within the December 14, 2001 restoration plan. After reviewing your application, we
have decided that this fill is covered by General Water Quality Certification Numbers 3288. This Certification allows you to use
Nationwide Permit 12 when issued by the US Army Corps of Engineers (USACE). This letter will also act as your Authorization
Certificate for impacts to the protected riparian buffers per 15A NCAC 213 .0233. In addition, you should get any other required
federal, state or local permits before you go ahead with your project including (but not limited to) Sediment and Erosion Control.
Also, this approval will expire when the accompanying 404 permit expires unless otherwise specified in the General Certification.
This approval is only valid for the purpose and design that you described in your application dated November 20, 2001 with
additional information provided within December 14, 2001. If you change your project, you must notify us and you may be required
to send us a new application. If the property is sold. the new owner must be given a copy of this Certification and approval letter and
is thereby responsible for complying with all conditions. If total fills for this project (now or in the future) exceed one acre of wetland
or 150 tin= feet of stream, compensatory mitipation may be required as described in 15A NCAC 2H .0506 (h). For this approval to
be valid. you must follow the conditions listed in the attached certification and any additional conditions listed below.
1. Stormw-ater shall be directed as diffuse flow at non-erosive velocities through the protected stream buffers as identified within
15A tiC aC 2B .(r33.
2. Upon completion of all work approved within this Certification Approval and Authorization Certificate, and any subsequent
modifications, the applicant is required to return the attached certificate of completion to the 401/Wetlands Unit, North Carolina
Division of Water Quality, 1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC, 27699-1650..
3. The outside buffer, wetland or water boundary and along the construction corridor within these boundaries approved
under this authorization shall be clew marked by orange fabric fencing for the areas that have been approved to
infringe within the buffer, wetland or mater prior to any land disturbing activities to ensure compliance with 15A
NCAC 2B.0233 and GC 3288.
4. The Zone I sewer line is required to be completely abandoned by no later April 1, 2002.
5. After the Zone I sewer line is abandoned please provide a letter to the Division of Water Quality, Raleigh Regional
Office, 3800 Barrett Dr., Raleigh NC, 27609 and to the 401 Wetlands Certification Unit at the letterhead address
detailing that the sewer line is property abandoned as indicated in the restoration plan prepared by Engineering
Consuhant Services, LTD. dated December 14, 2001.
6. Restoration to Zone 1, as indicated by the restoration plan prepared by Engineering Consultant Services, LTD. dated
December 14, 2001, is required. Also. additional conditions include the restoration planting efforts as proposed in the
plan be completed prior to the submission of the first monitoring report which is to be no latter than December 31,
401 WETLANDS CERTFICATIM UNIT
North Cardin Division of Wauw Quality, Department of Err*onment and Natural Resources
2321 Crabtree Blvd., Raleigh, NYC 27604-2260 (Location)
1650 Mail Service Center, Rafetigh_ NC 27699-1650 (Mailing Address)
919-733-1786 (phone), 919-7'.S-53 (fax), httpJ/h2o,enr.state.nc.us/ncwedands

Page 2 of 2
2002. Also, it is a condition that these monitoring reports specifically include accounts, dates, and actions taken to
abate problems that are observed during monitoring efforts to insure the restoration success of Zone I.
If you do not accept any of the conditions of this certification and authorization certificate, you may ask for an adjudicatory
hearing. You must act within 60 days of the date that you receive this letter. To ask for a hearing, send a written petition, which
conforms to Chapter 150B of the North Carolina General Statutes to the Office of Administrative Hearings, P.O. Box 27447, Raleigh,
N.C. 27611-7447. This certification and its conditions are final and binding unless you ask for a hearing.
This letter completes the review of the Division of Water Quality under Section 401 of the Clean Water Act and Neuse
riparian buffer protection rule as described within 15A NCAC 2B .0233. If you have any questions, please telephone John Dorney at
919-733-9646 or Danny Smith at 919-733-9716.
Sincerely,
gry J. Thorpe ,--
WQ, Acting Di ctor
TIFeldOffice
Cc: US Army Corps of Engineers Raleigh ReguNC Division of Water Quality Raleigh Regional Office - Charles Brown
File Copy
Central Files
Danny Smith -401 Wetland Unit
Ben Wilson -Engineering Consulting Services, LTD.
P.O. Box 12015, Research Triangle Park, NC 27709
[DWQ # 0117251

MEMORANDUM
TO: John Dorney Regional Contact: Charles Brown
Non-Discharge Branch WQ Supervisor: Ken Scb inter
Date:
SUBJECT: WETLAND STAFF REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS
Facility Name Fuquay-Varina Sewer relocation
Project Number 01 1725
Recvd From APP
Received Date 11/27/01 Recvd By Region
Project Type sewer line violation
County WAKE
County2
Region Raleigh
Certificates Stream
Permit Wetland Wetland Wetland Stream Class Acres
Type Type -Impact Score Index Prim. Supp. Basin Req.
\L\1` /
Feet
Req.
F12 ? O YO N F 27-43-15-8 I NSW 30,403. I - ?-
7_71 10 Y O
Mitigation Wetland
MitigationType Type Acres Feet

(19A X ( U?
U \ 1y /?1
Is Wetland Rating Sheet Attached? 0 Y 0 N Did you request more Info? 0 Y 0 N
Have Project Changes/Conditions Been Discussed With Applicant? 0 Y 0 N
Is Mitigation required? 0 Y 0 N Recommendation: 0 Issue 0 Issue/fond 0 Deny
Provided by Region: Latitude (ddmmss) Longitude (ddmmss)
Comments:
4
They need to provide a detailed buffee i
a certeficatwon that the fine is abandoned and a letter detailing what VAs "I rl_
cc: Regional Office Page Number 1
Central Office
DWQ Project No.:
Applicant:
Project Name:
Date of Issuance of 401 Water Quality Certification:
County:
Certificate of Completion
Upon completion of all work approved within the 401 Water Quality Certification or applicable Buffer Rules, and any subsequent
modifications, the applicant is required to return this certificate to the 401/Wetlands Unit, North Carolina Division of Water
Quality, 1621 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC, 27699-1621. This form may be returned to DWQ by the applicant, the
applicant's authorized agent, or the project engineer. It is not necessary to send certificates from all of these.
Applicant's Certification
I, , hereby state that, to the best of my abilities, due care and diligence was
used in the observation of the construction such that the construction was observed to be built within substantial
compliance and intent of the 401 Water Quality Certification and Buffer Rules, the approved plans and specifications,
and other supporting materials.
Signature: Date:
Agent's Certification
I, , hereby state that, to the best of my abilities, due care and diligence was
used in the observation of the construction such that the construction was observed to be built within substantial
compliance and intent of the 401 Water Quality Certification and Buffer Rules, the approved plans and specifications,
and other supporting materials.
Signature: Date:
Engineer's Certification
Partial Final
I, , as a duly registered Professional Engineer in the State of North
Carolina, having been authorized to observe (periodically, weekly, full time) the construction of the project,for the
Permittee hereby state that, to the best of my abilities, due care and diligence was used in the observation of the
construction such that the construction was observed to be built within substantial compliance and intent of the 401
Water Quality Certification and Buffer Rules, the approved plans and specifications, and other supporting materials.
Signature Registration No.
Date
ENGINEERING CONSULTING SERVICES, LTD.
Geotechnical • Construction Materials • Environmental
November 20, 2001
Mr. Todd Tugwell, M.F.
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
6508 Falls of Neuse Road, Suite 120 1 ' 7 2 5
Raleigh, North Carolina 27615
Mr. John Dorney
NCDENR - Division of Water Quality
401 Wetlands Unit
1650 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1650
"7
RE: Pre-Construction Notification Application and Partial NOV Response
Fuquay Varina Sanitary Sewer Line Relocation
Wake County, Fuquay Varina, North Carolina
ECS project # T2839
Dear Sirs:
Enclosed, please find the Pre-Construction Notification Application for the above referenced
site. We estimate that the project has impacted approximately 0.17 acres of wetlands. The new
sewer line will not impact any wetlands or stream; however, a written authorization to impact
Zone II of the Neuse buffer of the on-site stream (approx. 550-linear feet/ approx. 0.07-acre
impact) is requested.
A gravity sanitary sewer line was placed on the subject property in 2001. The site was not issued r'=
a 401 or a 404 permit prior to construction. The site was issued a Notice of Violation on July 30, , cD
2001 (see attached letter).
This pre-construction notice is to inform you of the intent to abandon the former line and
construct a new sanitary sewer line, with the written permission of the North Carolina
Department of water quality, in Zone II of the Neuse buffer of the stream located on-site. The
purpose of this relocation is to move the current sanitary sewer line out of Zone I of the Neuse
Buffer and replant and restore all impacts made to this Zone I buffer area during the previous
construction. The replanting and restoration (restoration plan) of Zone I will be covered in a
separate letter.
During the construction of the current gravity sanitary sewer system, approximately 0.17 acre of
wetlands were disturbed. Due to the physical characteristics of the site (on-site stream, the
physical size of the site, and site topography), the only applicable place to replace the gravity
sanitary sewer line is in Zone II of the Neuse buffer area of the on-site stream.
P. O. Box 12015, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina 27709 • [phone] * FAX [phone] * www.ecslimited.com
Aberdeen, MD* • Atlanta, GA • Austin, TX • Baltimore, MD • Chantilly, VA • Charlotte, NC • Chicago, T.1?C?oN eFliaa,?Gt*OallII ?7 XT VD?n 1 A* r k, MD • Fredericksburg, VA
Greensboro, NC • Greenville, SC • Norfolk, VA • Research Triangle Park, NC • Richmond, VA RoanIke; VA-Sad'Antonto"TX ?V?lia ms urg, ?E ifnungion, NC Winchester, VA
*Testing Services Only
A review of the Wake County soil survey indicates that a stream is located on the west side of
the site (See Attached figures). The stream that is shown on the soils map is perennial and
appears to originate well to the south of the site. The soils map additionally shows a pond
located on the east side of the site. This pond is shown to discharge runoff into the westerly
located stream. Based on our site reconnaissance conducted on November 2, 2001, there is a
small overflow/discharge pipe located on the north side of the pond. ECS did not observe any
wetlands or streams located near this discharge pipe. Additionally, ECS did not observe any
wetland or streams on, around, or associated with this on-site pond.
A review of the USGS 7.5 series topographic map of Fuquay Varina indicates that a stream is
located on the western portion of the site. This USGS map shows the stream originating at a
pond located on the east side of the site. Based on our site reconnaissance conducted on
November 2, 2001, there is a small overflow/discharge pipe located on the north side of the
pond. ECS did not observe any wetlands or streams located near this discharge pipe.
Additionally, ECS did not observe any wetland or streams on, around, or associated with this on-
site pond.
Based on our calculations, we estimate the total amount of wetlands previously impacted by this
project is approximately 0.17 acres. The relocation and construction of the new sewer line will
not impact any wetlands or stream areas. A Nationwide Permit 12 and 401 Water Quality
certification for the existing wetland impact is required. We additionally request written
authorization to impact Zone II of the Neuse buffer (approx. 550-linear feet/ approx. 0.07-acre
impact) of the on-site stream for the construction of the new gravity sanitary sewer line.
Once the new gravity sanitary sewer line has been constructed, stable vegetation will be planted
in the Zone II area. A replanting and restoration (restoration plan) of the impacted Zone I of the
Neuse riparian buffer will be submitted under a separate letter.
In addition, we will respond to the remaining "bulleted" items in the NOV letter (dated July 30,
2001) under a separate letter.
Please feel free to contact us at [phone] if you have any questions concerning this request
or if additional information is required. Thank you in advance for your timely consideration in
this matter.
Sincerely,
Engineering Consulting Services
Paul G. Wiesner
Staff Scientist
enjamm J. Wilson, P.E.
Principal Engineer / Vice President
I:\Projects\T2000-T2999\T-2839W PPletter.doc
ENGINEERING CONSULTING SERV'CES, LTD.
Form Version October 2001
Office Use Only: O 725
USACE Action ID No. DWQ No.
If any particular item is not applicable to this project, please enter "Not Applicable" or "N/A" rather than
leaving the space blank.
I. Processing
1. Check all of the approval(s) requested for this project:
X Section 404 Permit
? Section 10 Permit
401 Water Quality Certification
Riparian or Watershed Buffer Rules
2. Nationwide, Regional or General Permit Number(s) Requested: ?c
3. If this notification is solely a courtesy copy because written approval for the 401 Certification
is not required, check here: ?
4. If payment into the North Carolina Wetlands Restoration Program (NCWRP) is proposed for
mitigation of impacts (see section VIII - Mitigation), check here: ?
II. Applicant Information
1
2
Owner/Applicant licant
Name:
Mailing Address:
Telephone Number: N v 7) 1,25 .1 D y U Fax Number:
E-mail Address:
Agent Information (A signed and dated copy of the Agent Authorization letter must be
attached if the Agent has signatory authority for
owner/applicant.)
the,,
Name:
Company Affiliation:
Mailing Address:
Telephone Number: I 5 1 Fax Number:_ 1 % '
?d,
E-mail Address:
Information

Y1,111. h'.
Page 5 of 12
III. Project Information
Attach a vicinity map clearly showing the location of the property with respect to local
landmarks such as towns, rivers, and roads. Also provide a detailed site plan showing property
boundaries and development plans in relation to surrounding properties. Both the vicinity map
and site plan must include a scale and north arrow. The specific footprints of all buildings,
impervious surfaces, or other facilities must be included. If possible, the maps and plans should
include the appropriate USGS Topographic Quad Map and NRCS Soil Survey with the property
boundaries outlined. Plan drawings, or other maps may be included at the applicant's discretion,
so long as the property is clearly defined. For administrative and distribution purposes, the
USACE requires information to be submitted on sheets no larger than 11 by 17-inch format;
however, DWQ may accept paperwork of any size. DWQ prefers full-size construction
drawings rather than a sequential sheet version of the full-size plans. If full-size plans are
reduced to a small scale such that the final version is illegible, the applicant will be informed that
the project has been placed on hold until decipherable maps are provided.
1. Name ofprofect: f e I' 'll
2. T.I.P. Project Number or State Project Number (NCDOT Only):
3. Property Identification Number (Tax PIN): l? 7 y y?
4. Location
County: Wc, c Nearest Town• 'v Y V.
'
.. Subdivision name (include phase/lot number):
Directions to site (include road numbers, landmarks, etc.): `
A IdI IrI ,/ . 41 r7 (717 / t f . /9/7 / -/ ? e..1 f J .r1`1 rr.1 .. 7` 1 f 4111 -i re+ e

9
5. Site coordinates, if available (UTM or Lat/Long): 1) T-11 /7 7on S -? ? t= .3 W7/I/
(Note - If project is linear, such as a road or utility line, attach a sheet that separately lists the
coordinates for each crossing of a distinct waterbody.)
6. Describe the existing land use or condition of the site at the time of this ap lication:T
T h e' rP /z r l? n r 1 , ?ne^./?P €:?_ /? / ?TS'??;,IPi?(r' /.S / :-(• w:,s' ??'C..,.
!. ,
fl, t lief
7. Property size (acres): 0 r r - fl ; r
8. Nearest body of water (stream/river/sound/ocean/lake):
River Basin: ,N Fc?/S ('
(Note - this must be one of North Carolina's seventeen designated maj
River Basin map is available at htip://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/admin/mVs/.)
river basins. The
Page 6 of 12
10. Describe the purpose of the proposed work:
?? ; f r?ic f ??
Ste. it . ' ??., ?. ?? •.i F . 1. f -f e, -41 0 r

11. List the type o equipment to be used to construct the project: • i i ,c )C4, n PI ?, e
kf ?"
12. Describe the land use in the vicinity of this project: / 1fS - ??-? T < f //
IV. Prior Project History
If jurisdictional determinations and/or permits have been requested and/or obtained for this
project (including all prior phases of the same subdivision) in the past, plea§ i e explain. Include
the USACE Action ID Number, DWQ Project Number, application date, and date permits and
certifications were issued or withdrawn. Provide photocopies of previously issued permits,
certifications or other useful information. Describe previously approved Wetland, stream and
buffer impacts, along with associated mitigation (where applicable). If this is, a NCDOT project,
list and describe permits issued for prior segments of the same T.I.P. project, along with
construction schedules.
? C S, f r 1 /G s Jr r urJ il/n f; e n ls'
V. Future Project Plans
Are any future permit requests anticipated for this project? If so, describe the anticipated work,
and provide justification for the exclusion of this work from the current application:
VI. Proposed Impacts to Waters of the United States/Waters of the State
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
wetlands, open water, and stream channels associated with the project. The applicant must also
provide justification for these impacts in Section VII below. All proposed impacts, permanent
and temporary, must be listed herein, and must be clearly identifiable on ark accompanying site
plan. All wetlands and waters, and all streams (intermittent and perennial) must be shown on a
delineation map, whether or not impacts are proposed to these systems. Wetland and stream
evaluation and delineation forms should be included as appropriate. Photographs may be
included at the applicant's discretion. If this proposed impact is strictly for wetland or stream
mitigation, list and describe the impact in Section VIII below. If additional space is needed for
listing or description, please attach a separate sheet.
Page 7 of 12
1. Wetland Impacts ?p U-ef)u,j 1,PY11C Y d'6,' . /1-C LJ

Wetland Impact
Site Number
indicate on ma
Type of Impact* Area of
Impact
acres Located within
100-year Floodplain**
es/no) Distance to
Nearest Stream
feet
Type of Wetland***

* List each impact separately and identify temporary impacts. Impacts include, but are not limited to: mechanized clearing, grading, fill,
excavation, flooding, ditching/drainage, etc. For dams, separately list impacts due to both structure and flooding.
** 100-Year floodplains are identified through the Federal Emergency Management Agency's (FEMA) Flood Insurance Rate Maps
(FIRM), or FEMA-approved local floodplain maps. Maps are available through the FEMA Map Service Center at 1-800-358-9616, or
online at htto://www.fema.Rov.
*** List a wetland type that best describes wetland to be impacted (e.g., freshwater/saltwater marsh, fores?ed wetland, beaver pond,
Carolina Bay, bog, etc.)
List the total acreage (estimated) of existing wetlands on the property:
Total area of wetland impact?epeeed ?A???a,? ?. / 7 c c r
2. Stream Impacts, including all intermittent and perennial streams
Stream Impact
Site Number
indicate on ma
Type of Impact* Length of
Impact
linear feet
Stream Name** Average Width
of Stream
Before Impact Perennial or
Intermittent?
leasespecify)

* List each impact separately and identify temporary impacts. Impacts include, but are not limited to: culverts and associated rip-rap,
dams (separately list impacts due to both structure and flooding), relocation (include linear feet before and after, and net loss/gain),
stabilization activities (cement wall, rip-rap, crib wall, gabions, etc.), excavation, ditching/straightening, etc. If stream relocation is
proposed, plans and profiles showing the linear footprint for both the original and relocated streams must be included.
** Stream names can be found on USGS topographic maps. If a stream has no name, list as UT (unnamed tributary) to the nearest
downstream named stream into which it flows. USGS maps are available through the USGS at 1-800-358-9616, or online at
www.usas.¢ov. Several intemet sites also allow direct download and printing of USGS maps (e.g., www.tol2ozone.com,
www.magguest.com, etc.).
Cumulative impacts (linear distance in feet) to all streams on site: /V T,
5 .
e
Page 8 of 12
3. Open Water Impacts, including Lakes, Ponds, Estuaries, Sounds, Atlantic Ocean and any
other Water of the U.S. lV , / J/?
D''1 C / /V
Open Water Impact
Site Number

indicate on ma
Type of Impact* Area of
Impact

acres
(if Name p Waterbody
applicable) Type of Waterbody

(lake, pond, estuary, sound,
a , ocean, etc.

* List each impact separately and identify temporary impacts. Impacts include, but are not limited to: ill, excavation, dredging,
flooding, drainage, bulkheads, etc.
4. Pond Creation
If construction of a pond is proposed, associated wetland and stream impacts should be
included above in the wetland and stream impact sections. Also, the proposed pond should
be described here and illustrated on any maps included with this application.
Pond to be created in (check all that apply): ? uplands ? stream ? wetlands
Describe the method of construction (e.g., dam/embankment, excavation, installation of
draw-down valve or spillway, etc.):
Proposed use or purpose of pond (e.g., livestock watering, irrigation, aesthetic, trout pond,
local stormwater requirement, etc.):
Size of watershed draining to pond: Expected pond surface area:
VII. Impact Justification (Avoidance and Minimization)
Specifically describe measures taken to avoid the proposed impacts. It may be useful to provide
information related to site constraints such as topography, building ordinances, accessibility, and
financial viability of the project. The applicant may attach drawings of alternative, lower-impact
site layouts, and explain why these design options were not feasible. Also discuss how impacts
were minimized once the desired site plan was developed. If applicable, discuss construction
techniques to be followed during construction to reduce impacts. /
dle l f?/f 0 yl IG lf?Gir?r?'r, e/.IJ ? 7-,/1 (fin -.S.?'P
_.t.C:! 'Irq ?•i r .:. / , .) r-/1 '? Z -t 'C] I Al r U (4A;"; . _'e..T Mi" N?'? / /O Fa
V l i-,7 t° 'fn C,,_f-"' V(- e I?e t'l e-,/G,/ .',n?
VIII. Mitigation
DWQ - In accordance with 15A NCAC 2H .0500, mitigation may be required by the NC
Division of Water Quality for projects involving greater than or equal to one acre of impacts to
freshwater wetlands or greater than or equal to 150 linear feet of total ir4pacts to perennial
streams.
Page 9 of 12
USACE - In accordance with the Final Notice of Issuance and Modification of Nationwide
Permits, published in the Federal Register on March 9, 2000, mitigation will be required when
necessary to ensure that adverse effects to the aquatic environment are minimal. Factors
including size and type of proposed impact and function and relative value of the impacted
aquatic resource will be considered in determining acceptability of appropriate and practicable
mitigation as proposed. Examples of mitigation that may be appropriate and practicable include,
but are not limited to: reducing the size of the project; establishing and jmaintaining wetland
and/or upland vegetated buffers to protect open waters such as streams; and replacing losses of
aquatic resource functions and values by creating, restoring, enhancing, or preserving similar
functions and values, preferable in the same watershed.
If mitigation is required for this project, a copy of the mitigation plan must be attached in order
for USACE or DWQ to consider the application complete for processing. Any application
lacking a required mitigation plan or NCWRP concurrence shall be ,placed on hold as
incomplete. An applicant may also choose to review the current guidelines fj r stream restoration
in DWQ's Draft Technical Guide for Stream Work in North Carolina, available at
htip://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands/strin.gide.html.
1.
Provide a brief description of the proposed mitigation plan. The description should provide
as much information as possible, including, but not limited to: site location (attach directions
and/or map, if offsite), affected stream and river basin, type and amount ;(acreage/linear feet)
of mitigation proposed (restoration, enhancement, creation, or preservation), a plan view,
preservation mechanism (e.g., deed restrictions, conservation easement, etc.), and a
description of the current site conditions and proposed method of construction. Please attach
9 QP.ngrgtt- eheet if mnrn cnnre is nP..P.AAr1
Ile
?6f1'1
2.
Mitigation may also be made by payment into the North Carolina Wetlands Restoration
Program (NCWRP) with the NCWRP's written agreement. Check the box indicating that
you would like to pay into the NCWRP. Please note that payment into the NCWRP must be
reviewed and approved before it can be used to satisfy mitigation requirements. Applicants
will be notified early in the review process by the 401/Wetlands Unit if payment into the
NCWRP is available as an option. For additional information regarding the application
process for the NCWRP, check the NCWRP website at ho://h2o.enr.state.n?.us/wro/index.htm. If
use of the NCWRP is proposed, please check the appropriate box on page three and provide
the following information:
Amount of stream mitigation requested (linear feet):
Amount of buffer mitigation requested (square feet):
Amount of Riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres):
Amount of Non-riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres):
Amount of Coastal wetland mitigation requested (acres):
Page 10 of 12
IX. Environmental Documentation (DWQ Only)
Does the project involve an expenditure of public funds or the use of public (federal/state/local)
land?
Yes ? No
If yes, does the project require preparation of an environmental doculn1ent pursuant to the
requirements of the National or North Carolina Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
Note: If you are not sure whether a NEPA/SEPA document is requited, call the SEPA
coordinator at [phone] to review current thresholds for environmental documentation.
Yes ? No ?
If yes, has the document review been finalized by the State Clearinghouse? If so, please attach a
copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval letter.
Yes ? No ?
X. Proposed Impacts on Riparian and Watershed Buffers (DWQ Only)
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
required state and local buffers associated with the project. The applicant must also provide
justification for these impacts in Section VII above. All proposed impacts must be listed herein,
and must be clearly identifiable on the accompanying site plan. All buffers must be shown on a
map, whether or not impacts are proposed to the buffers. Correspondence from the DWQ
Regional Office may be included as appropriate. Photographs may also be included at the
applicant's discretion.
Will the project impact protected riparian buffers identified within 15A NCAC 2B .0233
(Meuse), 15A NCAC 2B .0259 (Tar-Pamlico), 15A NCAC 2B .0250 (Randleman Rules and
Water Supply Buffer Requirements), or other (please identify, )?
Yes El No ? If you answered "yes", provide the follolwing information:
Identify the square feet and acreage of impact to each zone of the riparian buffers. If buffer
mitigation is required calculate the required amount of mitigation by applying the buffer
multipliers.

Zone* Impct
e Multiplier Required
s u
ar
feet Mitigation
1 )c << 3
2 _ 1.5
Total
Zone 1 extends out 30 feet perpendicular from near bank of channel; Zone 2 extends an
additional 20 feet from the edge of Zone 1.

Page 11 of 12

If buffer mitigation is required, please discuss what type of mitigation is pro osed (i.e., Donation
of Property, Conservation Easement, Riparian Buffer Restoration / Enhancement, Preservation or
Payment into the Riparian Buffer Restoration Fund). Please attach all appro riate information as
identified within 15A NCAC 2B.0242 or.0260.
0
e t_1
XI. Stormwater (DWQ Only)
I
Describe impervious acreage (both existing and proposed) versus total ?creage on the site.
Discuss stormwater controls proposed in order to protect surface waters and wetlands
downstream from the property.
loft, I L/f?/r_.,?,/ { (± ` ?, r Otl^1?°ra//.F
'70e) [J fC. /:f{'!? T"f~`'r ne{ r!l f^f', ?'f,..I Nf,t C 7/ A
U ?CV/tom! O< <• /"C Q/in%??°.,? I c?i: ./ ?i f .f?iP??');
XII. Sewage Disposal (DWQ Only)
i
Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discha a or discharge) of
wastewater generated from the proposed project, or available capacity of the ubject facility.
XIII. Violations (DWQ Only)
Is this site in ation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H.0500) or an? Buffer Rules?
Yes PT_ No ?
Is this an aft - e-fact pe it application?
Yes No
XIV. Other Circumstances (Optional):
It is the applicant's responsibility to submit the application sufficiently in (advance of desired
construction dates to allow processing time for these permits. However; an applicant may
choose to list constraints associated with construction or sequencing that m4y impose limits on
work schedules (e.g., draw-down schedules for lakes, dates associated with Endangered and
Threatened Species, accessibility problems, or other issues outside of the applicant's control).

l/ r?c?/?0
Applicant/Agent's Signature Date
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant is provided.)
Page 12 of 12
Sep-06-01 04:33pm From-Tricor
40T 628 6030 T-383 P-003/005 F-030
SEP. -05' O1(WED) 09:07 NCDENR RRO
Btate?TNorth isroffins
?esourai meM
V7*I14'stural Italoigh Regbnsl o1lks
NOW F. EMIsy, Gavsmor
Winism 0. Rota, 01"retary
July 30, 2001
Mr. Mate Halle, Cfi0
Main Sttemt Station of NC, LP
100 E Sybelia Drive
Maitland, Fi 32751
"Cam 4ROLa
CAM"ONMc"r &NO
S>YTMCr: NOTICE OF VIOLATION and
REC0hQRNDATT0N FOR MgF0RLJJU NT'.
FOR WETLAM STANDARD VIOLATION,
401 WATER QUAI TT4 CSRTIFICATM VIOLATION
FUQUAY VA"4A SOWBR =MSION
WAn COUNi"Y
Dear Mr. Hagle:
P. 002
On Juno S. 2001, Charles Brown of Ow Raleigh Regional Office and Denny Smith of the Central
Office with the Division of Water Quality conducted a site visit of to sawar entension pctoeet for Main
Street Station in Fuquay Vsriaa, North Carolina. Wetland and strum impacts assmiaed with the
installation of this gravity newer line wero noted during this site visit. A file review and ' utsiws with
Corps of T"Swers confirm that no 404 Permit (NW 12) has beets issued oTnotlfiaatinn N the
Corps of Engineers for this activity. As a result of dwse observations Regional Office also
conduoted a file review. Accordingly, site visit and reapeetive review has confirmed vin ems related to
the following items: (1) this project to not covered by a General 401 Water Quality an (3188),
(2) irr pam were observed pmeed in wetlands and to the stream, and (3) the approximately goo fat of
the N'wse Riparian Buffer zonc bad been removed during the installation of the sewerline,
hags L tat WAR DRAW cuffleawa
Wetland and stream disturbances corresponding to machanizt d lead elearilic goading,
and All for a utility line installation wom observcd. A file review indicates that the ?T S. Army
Carps of Engineers (COE) has not authorized use of NW 12 or has. notification boo provided by
the Corps of 8agineers ibr this activity. Accordingly, the review confirmed that no 1Pre-
consh uation Notification had been nrAdved by the Division of Water Quality for tike project and
no 401 Water Quality Ceziifiation has been issued, nor is it covered by a Ganeca1401 Water
Quality Certification. A 401 Water Quality Certification is to WvA for the aboveahentioned
Impacts pursuant to 1 SA NCAC MOW.
1626 MON S*MCG Conter? Rataloh, NC 2706-1S2B Telophono (HO)671- 4700 A4X [phone]
An Equal AppoAunity Affir n ft Aetlon Employer 00% mayeledM 0% post-tonsumer paper
TEL:[phone]
SIP-08-01 04:33pm From-Tricor
S'EP. -05' 01(WED) 09:07 NODENR RRO
Ml<in St Station NOVINOIE
Page 2
407 828 5030 T-383 P.004/005 F-030
TEb:919 571 471t P.003
Hest H, Watlali Standard VlejdM
wetland dishabsoce corresponding to mmhaniadd lath! clearing, vending, and for s utility
lino isartsAatioa was observed. A file review indicates drat the U.S. Anny Corps of I?n (C0M has
not sudtotised use ofNW 12 for tl* activity. Further., drone is uO 1 tM issued 401 Water IQtulity
Cer"catioa for this ptgjML The reveetive placommt of fill, grubbing, and dlw?ft in pvC tds
teprase a violadoos of the following North Carolina wedand slondard, which statss:
15A NCAC 28 -Onl(b) (1) said (5)
1) Liquids, All or other solids or dissolved gaga may not be present in amounts which my
cause advww impacts an existing yvcdmd usa.
5) Hydrological conditions neaesssty to support the biological and pbysical o1ac?stics
naturally present in wetlands shall be pmtmted to prewt>t adverse itllpeota
C) The chemical, nutrient and dissolved oxygen regims of the wetland;
D) The movement of aquatic hurm
F) Water levels or sievatio»s.
lfalq M. Nsa= fluff ISA MQC Z_H =
This rale details that s 50 foot ripwian (Wmnside) busier sons, Zoos I and Zone II, shall con4st
of stable, vegetated area that is undisturbed =cept ft activities auto usas provided for in Item (6)
of the Rule. Specifically, for non electric utility linos impacts, other than p"andiculv
closings, require written authorlzationt for impacts to zone 11 and impacts to zone I requim
wrW= authorization and mitigation. Also, a file review oonthued that notifies ' was not
provided to DWQ prior to the riparian zone impacts and Ao Variance Requeat or Praotical
Alt*mWvo Request was readvad prior to the approximate S00 fart of riparian zone aewa line
impacts.
This OfYks requests that you respond, in writing, within is days of recwpt of this Nodco of
Violation. Your response must address the following items;
e Please discuss your efforts to abate impacts to wetlands and waters of the Stets
e Please provide an itemized estimation of the wetladd impacts with in the fbvtprrnt of the
easement.
Fe Please show your constcuation corridor width and maintenance corridor width oa your act of
plans.
[• Please clearly depict the locations and the design of each anti-seep collar installed along this
sewer line.
• Also, please indicate whether this sewer line includes lift stations, any raspactiv wetland
impacts associated with the installation of a lift station, and name of &tgi = that sealed the
plans.
Finally, please explain why you did not serum a Section 401 Water Quality Certification and
detail how you propose to pmm mt this problem from amutring on tlrture projects.
C Please abarly diacttes your effara and provide an accurate tittle schedule with dates which
detail how h upaets to the stream and the riparian zone (streamside eras) will be stored.
"• You should provide an emtimato of the total acreage of impact of zone I and zona Ii
resPectively.
• Please indicate your plans to rermove the Sewer line AM stone 1 of the riparian z6a and
restore the buffer zone. Specifically, it appears that the sewerlfrte could be locerei'i outside
riparian zone, eliminating any impact. Please clearly explain wby the sewer line has installed
in the buffer zone and whether it can be removed and the stream rsatorad.
t= M80 Beivlea Csntsr, Rsleiph, NO 27016.1028
An Equal opportunity A}firmstWe Aegon Employer
7alsphone [phone] F"1919)471-4711
6011, r?ssvWed/1Det.,.,R?.r.r..?..------
I
Sep-06-01
04:34pm From-Tricor
9EP, -0S I NED) 09:07 NCDENR RRO
407 621 5030 T-363 P.005/005 F-030
TEL:9I9 571 4719, P. 004
Main SR Station NOV/NOIB
Page 3
You Should detail your plans to replant and restore all impacts to riparian zond (n r+eatoration
0140)-
• If compiow r*wi= row and stream matoration is mot possible you should clearly Mlain as
to why this can't be acemmpliebad. Your should than apply In an after-the-fact 1401 Water
Quality Certification and Authorization to impact the tiparlm zone.
e In addition, the mitomdon plans must accoW for and Clearly detail all impact. Those
impacts not safishotorily restored on site we required to be ridtigated at a 3:1 ftfio.
e It should be noted that satiafactory riparian zone restoration requires replandn* of at least 2
hardwood species and maintaining a stem daoaitylaurvivwImp of at least 320 >Rreee per acre at
the end S years.
• Also, please provide this offico with copies of any harvesting or timber sells receipts and any
copies of a forest manazeamnt plan.
This Office requires that violations, as detailed above, be co nveted immediately. Also
please note, these violations and any fainter violations are subject to civil penalty moment of
up to $2S,000.00 per day for each violation.
Also. Pre-construction notiffoation will be required and written aut}torixatidu fiv a the
Division of Water Quality will need to secured for this project if It cam not comply with am
conditions as set fth in do General Certification (3288). Thank you for your alt lion to this
maaar. This office is considetiuS hwarding an enforcement action recommandagon to the
Director regarding this matron. If you bave any questions, please caU Charles Brown or myself at
[phone].
Sincerely,
-cv?
Ismnoth Schuster
Water Quality Regional Supervisor
cc: RRO -DWQ
Central Office File copy
401 Wetland Unit -Danny Smith
Corp of surinccrs
Division of Land Quality - John Holly
1026 Mail Service Centw, Raleigh, NC 170N-1GU Telephone [phone] PA* (6211)1171.0111
An itquo opportunity AfOrmetiw Action Employer 00% reeye1e41110% pest-censumer paper
DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)_
Project/Site: 5-.,.
Applicant/Owner:
Investigator: F r`S L f c -
,7 7
i
Date: ///? O
County: c ?? /rf
State: _d/a,,,A
Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site? Yes No J.COm unity it):
- /
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation)? Yes No 1"ra act IfS:
Is the area a potential Problem Area? Yes No Plot I
IN naar M oxnlain nn reveres 1
VEGETATION

Dacus Stratum Indicator Dominant nt So .ice
111-r1) P11drOl1 -tyj,r04ePeh F-r.{ U Sraturn
8
2. iuiGrl ham., s j ra r 10,14 - C 10.
3._ A r P, ??? rd Nt ??L
4. T6 X r.(Pn nl -0 C.
-L-= s. 12.
S. 13.
14.
7 1s.
6. 16.
Percent of Dominant Species that are OBI. FACW or FAC 6
exaludin FAC
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
_ Recorded Data (Describe in Remarks):
_ Stream. Lake, or Tide Gouge
,_ Aerial Photographs
_. Other
_ No Recorded Data Available
Field Observations:
Depth of Surface Water:
Depth to Free Water in Pit:
Depth to Saturated Sol:
?? (in.)
1 (In.)
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Primary Indicetors:
_ Inundated
Saturated In Upper 12 inches
_ Water Marks
_ Drift Lines
_ Sediment Deposit
_ Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Secondary Indicators (2 or more required):
_? Oktdized Root Channels In Upper 12 Inches
_ Water-Stained Leaves
_ Local Sol Survey Data
_ FAC-Neutral Test
_ Other (Explain In Remarks)
Remarks: Al O (' I/
BZ Appendix 13 Bien and Example Data Forms
f
SOILS
t?
Map Limit Name
(Series and Phase): Drainage Clan:

Taxonomy (Subgroup): Field Observations
Confirm Mapped Type? Yes No
PmfLOnserlodom
Depth Matrix Color
jinchpj. Horizon Munsall Moist) (
Wide Colors MOO Abundance/ Texture, Concretions,
MunaaN Melet) S kagantrast Structure- etc.
o-10 )Vb,-l A/ 0

N"He Soll Indicators:
_ Hstonl _ Concretions
_ Histlc Spipedon _ Hgh Organic Content in Surface Layer In Sandy Soils
_ SuMdlo Odor _ Organic Streaking in Sandy Solis
_ Aqulo Moisture Regime _ Listed on Local Hydrlo Solis List
Reducing Conditions _ Listed on National Hydric Solo List
_ Qleyed or Low-Chroms Colors _ Other (E*bh in Remarks)
/
Remarks: //VJ/! J rll /CafC
.7 /loci
L C7 ?

el n/ I' f Oj %
AA'
C_7

-sv l l f

WETLAND DETERMINATION
ytlc Vegetation Present? (Carole) (Ckcle)
hydrology Present? Yep
F
olis Present? Yes is this Sampling Point Within a Wetland? Yes ?Vo)
Remarks:
/

Approved by HOUSACE 3/92
Appendix B Blank and Example Data Forms
B3
DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
Project/Site: ??J ?G 1/ A,?
c? . Date:
Applicant/Owner: Coup ?
Investigator: ors L / „ h , ,?f„ ty: IMP
Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site? Yes No Community ID: 1) a
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation).? Yes No
ot ID: I?:
Is the area a potential Problem Area? Yes No Plot ID:
(If needed. explain on reverse-1
ATION
Dominant Plant stratum kldic?tor
c. i.
Lt
3. _ / t 11 r /' S TP n tl r, `1'; /!1 ? Q q, •1-t? C 7
s.
8.
7.
a.
Percent of Dominant Species that are 081, FACW or FAC
Dominant Plant SoacWs a return kjdkalg?
t3.
14.
is.
ie.

Remarks: -
- ?'?Y?r o l
_ Recorded Data (Describe in Remarks):
_ Stream. Lake, or Tide Gauge
_ Aerial Photographs
Other
_ No Recorded Data Available
Field Observations:
Depth of Surface Water:
Depth to Free Water In Pit:
Depth to Saturated Solt:
Remarks:
CG
U - J
(in,)
0 ,, Z- (in.)

Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Primary Indicators:
Inundated
z Saturated in Upper 12 Inches
_ Water Marks
_ Drift Lines
_ Sediment Deposits
_ Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Secondary hdicatora (2 or more requir?d):
Oxidized Root Channels In Upper 12 Inches
_ Water-Stained Leaves
_ Local Soll Survey Data
_ FAC•Neutral Test
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)

B2
Appendix 9 Blank and Example Data Forms

SOILS
!J
f
Map Unit Name
(Series and Phase): Drainage Class:
Taxonomy (Subgroup): Field Observations
Confirm Mapped Type? Yes No
Profile rMadriollan:
Depth Matrix Color Mottle Colors Mottle Abundance/ Texture, Concretions,
linger Horizon IMunsell Mohr fMunselt Moisn zs/Conlraal
r?fl Stmeture_ etc.
U ?lb 10 /y/- ill lU0'1C A/e ?, ??? :?y?.
Hydric Son Indicators:
_ Hlstosol _ Concretions
_ Hello Bpipedon _ Hgh Organic Content in Surface Layer In Sandy Solis
Sulildlo Odor _ Organic Streaking In Sandy Soils
Aquta Moisture Regime _ Listed on Local Hydrlo Solis List
_ Reducing Conditions _ Listed on f4donal RAdc Soils List
aksyld or Low•Chroma Colon _ Other (Explain in Remarks) /
Remarks: / U /? f-. // / - - / .? /lydf ?- C < !? fli,• ! c I
(f.?? i ?! c o c? /7,0 U k;l? •^c7
DETERMINATION
Fydrophytic Vegetation PrsswV No (Circle)
Welland hydrology Present? No
Hydric Solis Present? I No
Remarks: IPG /a ^, ?_r
(Circle)
Is this Sampling Point Within a Wetland? Yes No
t. e-
Approved by HOUSACE 3/92
AWsndix B Blank and Example Data Forms
B3
N
t ?\ 4 ?,??i ( ,?A^t ?..1 .} r.^ } .:c- ?,? .... 1 fi r.r?'•? ' ..t•""{ t' ?``
I 4
l"m 44 ` • - y. Sr?dsMet 4 _ r
bd } +? , G ^ti rr Park' }L
GSIT1L`
> r- ?t5 T •
r t. '.,. l
A r`` ? I I'?1 ` 1a i 4?. ,• ?'.\ i ?I? r r I ;:r !~`^ ? ?. III ?.
If{,() t
dT 4,
Pl,
'1 1?rr ??ti!?•:ll•Y. .t 1 ",_? ?' ? ( l I ? ^? + ?,? ?..I:r :i V +l s f 9 "'•?f
?? ?ZN I•I(? '?•II:. ?, 1 '^q in'' r ?t?'`?.``+{,? ?! J ?' ! ? i i
` ?? ?? P ill.' • '?i ? J '? ,•?, Zyy,y,?l,llt 4 ry r +r. {r'fl ''
+?}.?? ??i }? ?,A??Jfi• 'I+r..r. r.. ? i r4;.? ,1. ( ? i, ?'...?"4y
Y!?_ ?..+??•'"?? ? ? 'M 77VV •l?• 1?. ? -!-?"?'?"r .--i :??1' -- 11^??•:?• `? J.r~ tit ?'?, 11
j' 1 ` .{f t t ??•, 1 ?. ? ?'Ij ?`y ??' ? 7 ?'? ?? tjr? '1+??•t ?'M ... ?r
?1 • t 1 1
•J r ? 1 • 1 a . , 'i. ? t A?? i J i .i rrli }
,,t. r .? t 1? ••?ti? ?. ? 1' ,,.? ? IMAq t1J1?C ! -ply ?`- 1
'I.. I ? r-•.. ? _.,?'? ? ., ?-? ? ??J ?: ??.:......? -irk:-. ? ,,..;?._., , ?:.? I? i til `
`- _ ?I ` ... ,',
SCALE = I" 2,00 1
Engineering Vicinity Map
Consuidl,g USGS Topographic Map: Fuquay Varina Quadrangle FIGURE No.
Services, I
Ltd. ECS Project No.
Fuquay Varina Sanitary Sewer Property
T2839
V-1-1 Mr 3
MR4
-Y I

NoH ? r' :? I' 4 r $ WOO*
: Mn
?

W r u
J W4 ;
' Nab? wati
wp.A w
?, Was

V
` t MJ ?t)1 H 1 ?F

°
t°
'
J
0 p Wt,A
h r eC i 0 .
l r
' ??

y }
09 1
a? r
j'?' ' N ' '

t ?'J1t3
S WPA ? 1168 ?
s
U
•
r? e
4N # ' av
1
a W 5 u 1Yii
,s
a
' ,err=? - i. - :,?. -
•
?
^ . q
„? ?,,.,Wab..
a y °
8
Nog •?0 , ?
?^
l'
? t ' ?, ;r
-
? -.
°
Wv 7,WA13
° , i
M1tu,
'? a13
HnR
,. 4 0? VigA
wa '` NVd ?„ t '' ?n(nG N

No W.R I N
Wa t ;W
HJ1 ?.
r
N?`A Wet3 A
W&
Nnp2
tomb
'
` UteH '
.
\ -
f
', .. i Watt
4y A a 1 Nos
Nos
tp
r:- Pall? 4 , dE
r'
t A N°B2 WaC M H ?jRaa'v ?,

R Writ: r
T!„R
NnC1. ?,
SCALE= 1: 15840 ,4
y
Wan
.G W

-- --__--"- --_ ---- Vicinity Map
Engineering
Consulting 1970 Wake County N .C. Soil Survey Map - page 98 FIGURE NO.
2
2
Services,
Ltd. ECS Project No.
Fuquay Varina Sanitary Sewer Property
'('2839
1c 1
I?I• r ! . Ala } r
k { ?' r x ' ,1l,
• Was ?• R sr

wttA.

d Was 't
r
3l W,
1

ed t r.
Aj Q"_. ?. L NuR
}
,f

Engineering Vicinity Map
Consulting 1999 Wake County N.C. Aerial Photograph - Parcel #
Services, 0667423753
Ltd.
Fuquay Varina Sanitary Sewer Property
NO. I
ECS Project No.
T2839
Fuquay Varina Sanitary Sewer Property
ENGINEERING CONSULTING SERVICE, L'I'D.
I
Photo 2: A view of pond located to the east of the current sanitary sewer line.
sewer line.
ENGINEERING CONsuu ING SERVICE, LTD.
I
Fuquay Varina Sanitary Sewer Property
Fuquay Varina, North Carolina
T4 (rQ C. 1D-V--PCU1 I
\RJ ?5 l?(
MEMO
TO: Coleen Sullins
FROM: Danny Smith (as edited by John Dorney since Danny is out of town!)
DATE: December 4, 2001
RE: Fairfield Harbor project -
Resolution of Neuse River buffer rule violations
On November 30, Representative Alice Underhill requested that I meet with her
in order to discuss the problems (including the delay) with resolving the Fairfield Harbour
(violations/ complaints) on Thursday December 13th at 9:00 a.m. at the General
Assembly building. John Dorney also plans to attend. The purpose of this memo is to
seek your guidance on how to proceed before that meeting. We need your advise since
we have been unable to resolve this matter with the WaRO and now Rep. Underhill will
want some sort of resolution by the meeting next week.
For background, Fairfield Harbor is a large residential subdivision located along
Northwest Creek in Craven County in the Neuse River Basin. Large portions of this
tract contain upland soil (Seabrook Loamy sand) systems. However, many lots contain
wetland or upland/wetland matrices (Leon sand and Murville muck). Also, many lots are
located adjacent to a tidal creek that experience episodic flooding.
In response to drainage and flooding problems the Property Owners Association
(POA) installed six ditches through the riparian buffer in order to address local flooding
issues. DWQ was notified of this unauthorized action by the Neuse River Foundation.
The WaRO office issued an NOV for Neuse Buffer Violations on April 11, 2000 and with
the assistance of the Central Office 401/Wetland Unit the WaRO issued a second Notice
of Violation on January 16, 2001 (see attached chronology for details). In response to
the second Notice of Violation, the POA 1) removed some sediment that had
discharged into the edge of Northwest Creek, 2) removed three ditches and three
ditch/breaches that were draining wetlands, 3) submitted a nutrient management plan,
and 4) provided DWQ with a revised application for a Coastal Stormwater management
plan in efforts to resolve violations.
On November 26, 2001, 1 meet with Bill Moore while at the WaRO. He explained
that he was ready to issue the Coastal Stormwater Permit. However, due to time
constraints I was unable to resolve this matter last Monday. Since that time
Representative Alice Underhill, has called to request a meeting. Accordingly, I'm not
sure what is the appropriate way to proceed at this point. Specifically, should the WaRO
issue the Coastal Stormwater Permit with additional conditions (our preferred option I
outlined below) or should the WaRO send a letter similar to that attached (option II
outlined below) prior to the above mentioned meeting with Representative Alice
Underhill? We need your advise since we have been unable to resolve this issue with
the WaRO and we anticipate that Representative Underhill will want some sort of
resolution at the planned meeting next week.
The attached chronology should help you in your decision as should the two
attached options to resolving this matter. Also, if you have any questions please do not
hesitate to call me I will be in the field in WiRO this week with our EPA friends. Cell 218-
0745 or Joanne's cell 910 520-2240.
Option I. Include the following conditions in the coastal stormwater permit
The POA may leave previously constructed outfalls in place with the following caveats:
1) If wetland impacts are proposed or will occur by the implementation of the plan a
determination of the acreage of impact is necessary and must be submitted to the
US Army Corps of Engineers and DWQ for any necessary written approval, and
2) The constructed wetlands and other control structures approved under the coastal
stormwater permit must be installed within one year of issuance of this permit for
each respective outlet (#1-6). If this can not be accomplished, then the respective
ditches installed through the riparian zone are to be back-filled and riparian zone
restored through replanting within one year plus two months of the date of the
stormwater permit.
Please note that this condition may be unacceptable to the POA (time frame too
short) and to the Neuse River Foundation (time frame too long).
Option II:
Send this letter that then puts the project on hold pending resolution and decision
on these items by the POA. A major reason for this letter is that some of these lots will
flood again and DWQ may be "held to task" about that issue. Further, it is my
understand that: 1) the POA does not have the money to install the stormwater
management system they propose (although this problem could be addressed by a
Special Assessment by the POA)and 2) a POA correspondence dated June 29, 2001
faxed to me indicated that the POA intends to modify their stormwater plan once DWQ
issues it.
Please note that I emailed this draft letter to Bill Moore on Sept. 24, 2001. We
have no record of it being sent. My intention was that this letter or some version of this
letter be sent from the RO. I also, mailed a copy of the this letter to and the wetland
map that bob and I produced to Bill Moore in an effort to assist the RO with stormwater
plan review and the issuance of some sort of correspondences or a Coastal Stormwater
Permit. Despite this effort and numerous voice messages, I have not heard from Bill on
this matter or received a return phone call. I have only discussed this matter with Bill last
Monday (November 261h) when I encountered him in the RO during my compliance
presentation..... Bill explained that he was ready to issue the Stormwater Permit I
agreed with that approach but stated that we needed to discuss possible conditions
regarding wetland and buffer issues first. My intention was to discuss this letter or the
option of including permit conditions in the stormwater permit to address these issues.
Unfortunately, due time constraints I had to return to Raleigh for our 2:00 p.m. meeting
and did not get to discuss these issues with Bill. He has not returned subsequent phone
calls.
September 19, 2001 (apparently never sent)
Certified Mail
Return Receipt Requested
Fairfield Harbour POA
Attn: Mr. Bernie Teubert, Board President
902 Coral Reef Dr.
New Bern, NC 28560
Subject: Additional Information Request
Fairfield Harbour
Coastal Stormwater Permit
Wetland Standards
Neuse Riparian Buffer
Craven County
Dear Mr. Teubert:
On September 17, 2001, Danny Smith and Bob Zarzecki of the Division of Water
Quality Central Office conducted a site visit of the subject tract. This visit was in
response to your letter dated August 23, 2001. The Washington Regional Office and
Central Office Wetland 401 Unit are both reviewing the "No Practical Alternatives"
request and the respective stormwater management proposals provided by Fairfield
Harbour Property Owners Association in an effort to resolve concerns detailed in the
January 16, 2001 Notice of Violation. The purpose of this visit was to determine whether
wetlands might be impacted by the implementation of the Stormwater Management
Plan.
The US Army Corps of Engineers is the agency you should contact in order to
get determinations of the extent of wetlands on the site. However, the attached map
indicates areas that DWQ staff believes may contain wetlands. The intent of this effort
and the attached map is to provide information and assistance to the POA. Also, this
information is offered to help the POA to focus on the areas of concern with respect to
choosing how best to resolve the January 16, 2001 Notice of Violation and Coastal
Stormwater Permit issues.
Accordingly, please note that 15A NCAC 2H .1003 (g) requires the delineation of
relevant boundaries including drainage areas, seasonal high water table, wetlands,
property/project boundaries and drainage easements for a complete Coastal Stormwater
Plan review to take place. Also, 15 A NCAC 2H .0500 requires that for projects that
require a 404 Permit properly receive a 401 Water Quality Certification. Further, 15A
NCAC 2B .0321 depicts the wetland standards that require that wetland uses be
maintained.
Observations from the September 17, 2001 site visit, the absence of detail
depicting wetlands in the stormwater proposal, and your August 23, 2001 response that
explained the implementation schedule of these structures ranged from approximately
1.5 -7 years are problematic. It is the belief of this office that the POA has taken these
concerns noted in the January 16, 2001 Notice of Violation seriously. This is sincerely
appreciated by this office. However, the absences of wetland information, despite
detailed stormwater plans, is a serious concern. Also, the protracted time scheduled
proposed for the ultimate implementation/installation of the extended wetlands
stormwater detention, the respective resolution of the Neuse River Riparian Buffer Rule
violation, is not satisfactory. It is the intention of this office to resolve this matter;
however, if a resolution is not forthcoming this office will proceed with enforcement
recommendations. The following solutions are provided for your consideration:
Option (1)
The POA may leave any of the respective outfalls in place with the following
constraints:
1) Provide a revised plan that provides the location and affirmation in a written
response that the above mentioned standards will be maintained; 2) if wetland
impacts are proposed or will occur by the implementation of the plan a
determination of the acreage of impact is necessary such that you may
determine if a 404/401 Permit notification or other such notifications (i.e. isolated
wetland permit) is required and that proper permits for wetland impacts are
obtained; and 3) that the constructed wetlands and other control structures
approved under the coastal stormwater permit can be installed within one year.
• Option (2)
Fill the ditch and restore the riparian vegetation within the 50-foot riparian zone.
(This response will result in this office not proceeding with the enforcement action
recommendation matter.)
Option (3)
- Fill in the outfall ditch and restore the vegetation within the 50-foot
riparian zone.
- Priorities the locations that the POA desires to affect drainage.
- Determine the extent of wetland impacts that may result from drainage or
installation of structures to design to remove nitrogen. (Note: Impacts to
wetlands that exceed 1 acre will require mitigation).
- Submit a revised Coastal Stormwater Permit application depicting the
constructed wetlands, a complete no-practical alternative analysis
request, and a Pre-Construction Notification that appropriately detail
wetland locations and impacts.
- For future prioritized drainage stormwater management efforts you must
repeat this effort and request a respective modification of your Coastal
Stormwater Permit and secure a new authorization under the Neuse
Buffer Rules.
(Note: The above mentioned option 3 will resolve violations, enables you to
affect your desired drainage efforts, comply with Neuse Buffer Rules and Coastal
Stormwater Rules, and stem enforcement action recommendation. )
This Office requests that you respond to this letter, in writing, within 20 days of
receipt of this correspondence. Your response should clearly address what you intend
to do permanently resolve this matter. It is the intention of this office to immediately
address this matter, thereby the information you provided will be directly considered in
whether this office proceeds with an enforcement action recommendation. Also, please
provide 2 copies of your response to the DWQ Washington Regional Office (Attention
Bill Moore) and two copies to the 401 Wetland Unit (attention Danny Smith) at 2321
Crabtree Blvd., Raleigh, NC 27604-2260. Should you have any questions regarding this
matter, please contact Bill Moore at [phone] or Danny Smith at [phone].
Sincerely,
Jim Mulligan
Regional Supervisor
cc: WaRO-Division of Water Quality
WaRO-Land Quality Section
Corps of Engineer
Danny Smith, Central 401/Wetlands Unit
Central Files
Robert M. Chiles Engineers, P.O. Box 3496,
New Bern, NC 28564
Chronology (key items are in bold):
April 11, 2000 - DWQ issued NOV for buffer violations
April 14, 2000 - Bob Chiles response for POA to April 11, 2000 NOV
May 26, 2000 - CAMA NOV and request to Cease Unauthorized Development
July 14, 2000 - additional information provided to Bill Moore from Bob Chiles.
August 16, 2000 - additional Stormwater Management information provided to Bill
Moore
October 30, 2000 - Bob Chiles explains that the WaRO received a "no-practical
alternatives request" and the RO did not respond w/in 60 days. Thereby, he believed
that the POA had met the requirements of the Neuse buffer rules.
November 3, 2000 - Bob Chiles resubmits correspondences previously sent to the
Washington field office as relates to the Stormwater Management Plan and request for a
determination of "no practical alternatives"
November 6, 2000 - A copy was received in the Central Office of Bob Chiles' "no
practical alternatives request" dated: August 22, 2000.
November 10, 2000 - on hold "no practical alternatives" letter - info. request from
Dorney
November 13, 2000- Bob Chiles response to John Dorney's November 10, 2000 letter.
November 20, 2000 - Meeting in Raleigh with Dick Goodwin and Tom Jones (of the
Neuse River Foundation) with Danny Smith and Bob Zarzecki.
November 27, 2000 - Mr. Dick Goodwin (complainant, resident, and Neuse River
Foundation member) discuss the POA's stormwater permit application dated May 9,
2000 etc.
November 28, 2000 - Mr. Dick Goodwin, (complainant, resident, and Neuse River
Foundation member) comments on POA's stormwater permit application and comments
on buffer violations dated April, 11, 2000.
November 28, 2000 - Nature Conservancy supports NC's Stormwater Management and
Neuse River Buffer Rules and opposes the issuance of any permits to Fairfield Harbour.
December 13, 2000 - DWQ site visit (WaRO, 401 Unit staff ) - note: Neuse River
Foundation was present at the pre-meeting, but not during the site visit
December 13, 2000 - Letter from Southern Environmental Law Center -"express strong
support for the efforts of the Neuse Riverkeeper to ensure full compliance with existing
permitting, buffer protection, and pollution control requirements.
December 13, 2000 - Tom Jones letter to Deborah Sawyer objecting to be excluded (not
invited by the POA during) DWQ's site visit on December 13, 2000.
January 9, 2001 - letter thanking DWQ staff for the December 13, 2000 site visit.
January 16, 2001 - WaRO Notice of Violation
January 24, 2001 - Sierra Club oppose the issuance of any permits to Fairfield Harbour
until the applicant fully and completely complies with the sprit and intent of the Rules.
January 31, 2001 - Fairfield Harbour Response to January 26, 2001 letter
February 19, 2001 - Fairfield Harbour approval request for removal of sediment
discharge
April 11, 2001 - WaRO approval letter for ditch-outlet clean up.
April 16, 2001 - Fairfield Harbor Redesigned Stormwater Plan
May 28, 2001 - Opposition letter to stormwater plan from Fairfield Harbor residents
May 30, 2001 - Neuse River Foundation letter : detailed concerns for DWQ
consideration prior to the issuance of a Coastal Stormwater Permit
September 4, 2001 - Mr. Goodwin (complainant)
-meeting between Bob Zarzecki, Danny Smith, Roger Thorp, and Bill Moore - Day of
Tommy's goodbye celebration - wetlands, 401 Cert. and wetland standards was the
subject
August 6, 2001 - DWQ's additional information Request
August 23, 2001 - Response to DWQ's August 6th letter requesting additional
information
August 27, 2001 - Fax from Tom Jones of the Neuse River Foundation. The fax
provides a letter from Jim Scharbrough, President of the POA to Don Pollock Chairman
of the POA indicating their intent to modify the Stormwater Management plan once the
DWQ issued their original plan.
September 4, 2001- Jim Goodwin - provides written comments regarding concerns with
stormwater management and the continued presence of the ditches at Fairfield
Prior to September 17, 2001 - Danny Smith rec'd permission for POA to conduct a site
visit. Also, Danny Smith called the WaRO office left message for Bill Moore
communicating the intended site visit.
September 17, 2001 - Danny smith and Bob Zarzecki conduct site visit to determine
areas of uplands, potential wetlands and matrix of upland and wetlands necessary for an
expeditious/ complete review of the proposed nutrient management plan and appropriate
Coastal Stormwater plan review.
Danny Smith phoned and left messages with Bill Moore on numerous occasions
between September 17, 2000 and November 30, 2001. Danny Smith has yet to
received a return phone call from Bill Moore.
September 24, 2001 - Danny Smith - emailed Bill Moore the draft additional information
letter to be sent to the POA. (The email also notified Bill Moore of the onsite wetland
information collected by Danny Smith and Bob Zarzecki).
Danny Smith had not received a response regarding the September 24, 2001 email from
the RO or voice message left for Bill Moore.
November 12, 2001 - Nat Baggett of the Neuse River foundation called Danny
Smith and explained over the phone and followed up in an email that "our BOD
(board of directors) was very concerned, wanted more communication and in light
of the lack of communication and had voted to file a 60 day letter under the Clean
Water Act".
November 26, 2001 - Danny Smith visit to WaRO for compliance presentation. It was
explained to him that by Bill Moore that he was ready to issue the Stormwater Permit.
Time constraints prevented additional discussions on that day.
November 30, 2001 - Danny Smith rec'd request from Representative Alice
Underhill
rrl
6JLJ
Coleen:
Representative Alice Underhill has requested t at I meet with her in order to discuss the problems
(including the delay) with resolving the Fair f Id Harbour (violations/ complaints) on DeWmber 13`h at
9:00 a.m. at the General Assembly building.
Fairfield Harbor i Lsubdivision located along Northwest Creek in Craven County ' the Neuse River Basin. QV
Large portions of this tract contain upland soils (Seabrook Loamy sand) system .However, many lots
contain or are located on large matrix of uplands and wetland or wetlands pol gons (Leon sand and dd -l
Murville muck). Also, many lots are located wWdwt'ancF3C'?:p is ad' cent to a tidal 0 vY*Lq
creek that 1"4hemselves to episodic flooding ons.
.? "? <i?
etiL In response to drainage and flooding problems the Property Owners sociation (POA) installed *=ditches
through the riparian zone in orde The Wa office issued an NOV for Neuse
Buffer Violations-on Apni 11, 2000 and with the assistance of the entral Office 401/Wetland Unit the
Wa Notice of Violation on January 16, 2001, nt to the Me' nd of of Violation the 4
p moved some sediment that had discharge into the edge of orthwest , t ree itches and three
dbreaches that were draining wetlands were plugged, the4z9A ubmitted nutrient management plan, ?r^
?, 55 a provideoWQ with a revised Coastal Stormwater management plan in of orts to resolve violations.
G .
On November 26, 2001, I meet with Bill Moore while at the WaRO. He explained that he was ready to
?Ju? \ issue the Coastal Stormwater Permit. However, due to time constraints I was unable to resolve this matter
S? last Monday. Since that time Representative Alice Underhill, has called to request a meeting.
Accordingly, I not sure That is, do we issue the Coastal Stormwater
Permit with additional condi 'ons r issue a letter similar to that attached prior to the above mentioned
meeting wit Representativ Alic Underhil ? Please advise
O ` ?Nqy ? C(VoaZ'
I have att
ac ed Chronolog for your re is and t pss to resolving this
matter for ur considerat on. Also, if you have anyq es?tiOns please do not sitate to call me I will be in
the field in iRO this we k with our EPA friends. Cell 218-0745 or Joanne's ce 10 520-2240.
j PcY Cj
dannY a*
?ption4-''•
Send this letter thaWut the decision process on the POA. I e reason, is some of these lots will flood again and D Q may be "held to task" about that issue. Further, it is my
understand that: 1) the POA does not have the money to install the stormwater management system they 1
propos 2) a POA correspondence#dated June 29, 2001 faxed to M?indicated that the POA intends to
mo their stormwater plan once DWQ issues it.
c?
(Please note: I emailed this draft letter to Bill Moore on Sept. 24, 2001. My intention was that this letter or yT'
some version of this letter be sent from the RO. I also, mailed a copy of the d4gletterj& and the wetland
map that bob and I produced to Bill Moore in an effort to assist the RO with stormwater plan review and
the issuance of some sort of correspondences or a Coastal Stormwater Permit. Despite this effort and
numerous voice messages, I have not heard from Bill on this matter or received a return phone call. I have
only discussed this matter with Bill last Monday ( 6`h) when I encountered him in the RO during my
compliance presentation..... Bill explained that he was ready to issue the stormwater Permit.... I said okay,
0 bdYkt . My intention was to discuss thi letter or the option of including a schedule as a permit
4
conditions.... Unfortunately, due time constraints I had to return to Raleigh for our 2:00 p.m. meeting and
did not get to discuss these issues with Bill...) M-* 0-?-Xj,
1
11 CmSeA)
l?
Se "ember 19, 2001
Certified Mail
Return Receipt Requested
Fairfield Harbour POA
Attn: Mr. Bernie Teubert, Board President
902 Coral Reef Dr.
New Bern, NC 28560
Subject: Additional Information Request
Fairfield Harbour
Coastal Stormwater Permit
Wetland Standards
Neuse Riparian Buffer
Craven County
Dear Mr. Teubert:
On September 17, 2001, Danny Smith and Bob Zarzecki of the Division of Water Quality Central
Office conducted a site visit of the subject tract. This visit was in response to your letter dated August 23,
2001. The Washington Regional Office and Central Office Wetland 401 Unit are both reviewing the "No
Practical Alternatives" request and the respective stormwater management proposals provided by Fairfield
Harbour Property Owners Association in an effort to resolve concerns detailed in the January 16, 2001
Notice of Violation. The purpose of this visit was to determine whether wetlands might be impacted by the
implementation of the Stormwater Management Plan.
The US Army Corps of Engineers is the agency you should contact in order to get determinations
of the extent of wetlands on the site. However, the attached map indicates areas that DWQ staff believes
may contain wetlands. The intent of this effort and the attached map is to provide information and
assistance to the POA. Also, this information is offered to help the POA to focus on the areas of concern
with respect to choosing how best to resolve the January 16, 2001 Notice of Violation and Coastal
Stormwater Permit issues.
Accordingly, please note that 15A NCAC 2H .1003 (g) requires the delineation of relevant
boundaries including drainage areas, seasonal high water table, wetlands, property/project boundaries and
drainage easements for a complete Coastal Stormwater Plan review to take place. Also, 15 A NCAC 2H
.0500 requires that for projects that require a 404 Permit properly receive a 401 Water Quality
Certification. Further, 15A NCAC 2B .0321depicts the wetland standards that require that wetland uses be
maintained.
Observations from the September 17, 2001 site visit, the absence of detail depicting wetlands in
the stormwater proposal, and your August 23, 2001response that explained the implementation schedule of
these structures ranged from approximately 1.5 -7 years are problematic. It is the belief of this office that
the POA has taken these concerns noted in the January 16, 2001 Notice of Violation seriously. This is
sincerely appreciated by this office. However, the absences of wetland information, despite detailed
stormwater plans, is a serious concern. Also, the protracted time scheduled proposed for the ultimate
implementation/installation of the extended wetlands stormwater detention, the respective resolution of the
Neuse River Riparian Buffer Rule violation, is not satisfactory. It is the intention of this office to resolve
this matter; however, if a resolution is not forthcoming this office will proceed with enforcement
recommendations. The following solutions are provided for your consideration:
Option (1)
The POA may leave any of the respective outfalls in place with the following constraints:
1) Provide a revised plan that provides the location and affirmation in a written response that the
above mentioned standards will be maintained; 2) if wetland impacts are proposed or will occur by
the implementation of the plan a determination of the acreage of impact is necessary such that you
may determine if a 404/401 Permit notification or other such notifications (i.e. isolated wetland
permit) is required and that proper permits for wetland impacts are obtained; and 3) that the
constructed wetlands and other control structures approved under the coastal stormwater permit
can be installed within one year.
• Option (2)
Fill the ditch and restore the riparian vegetation within the 50-foot riparian zone. (This response
will result in this office not proceeding with the enforcement action recommendation matter.)
Option (3)
Fill in the outfall ditch and restore the vegetation within the 50-foot riparian zone.
- Priorities the locations that the POA desires to affect drainage.
- Determine the extent of wetland impacts that may result from drainage or installation of
structures to design to remove nitrogen. (Note: Impacts to wetlands that exceed 1 acre
will require mitigation).
Submit a revised Coastal Stormwater Permit application depicting the constructed
wetlands, a complete no-practical alternative analysis request, and a Pre-Construction
Notification that appropriately detail wetland locations and impacts.
For future prioritized drainage stormwater management efforts you must repeat this effort
and request a respective modification of your Coastal Stormwater Permit and secure a
new authorization under the Neuse Buffer Rules.
(Note: The above mentioned option 3 will resolve violations, enables you to affect your desired
drainage efforts, comply with Neuse Buffer Rules and Coastal Stormwater Rules, and stem
enforcement action recommendation. )
This Office requests that you respond to this letter, in writing, within 20 days of receipt of this
correspondence. Your response should clearly address what you intend to do permanently resolve this
matter. It is the intention of this office to immediately address this matter, thereby the information you
provided will be directly considered in whether this office proceeds with an enforcement action
recommendation. Also, please provide 2 copies of your response to the DWQ Washington Regional Office
(Attention Bill Moore) and two copies to the 401 Wetland Unit (attention Danny Smith) at 2321 Crabtree
Blvd., Raleigh, NC 27604-2260. Should you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact Bill
Moore at [phone] or Danny Smith at [phone].
Sincerely,
Jim Mulligan
Regional Supervisor
cc: WaRO-Division of Water Quality
WaRO-Land Quality Section
Corps of Engineer
Danny Smith, Central 401/Wetlands Unit
Central Files
Robert M. Chiles Engineers, P.O. Box 3496,
New Bern, NC 28564

?tslt rOption It Include the following coastal stormwater permit

• The POA may leave any of the respective outfalls in place with tLei s aints:
1) If wetland impacts are proposed or will occur by the implemen e determination of
the acreage of impact is necessary and must be submitted to
2) If i? ' determined that implementatio of this plan re res 404/40 emit no at on or oth
nvhificatiod-sYi.e. ise a e'd wetla ermi it is a nditi of t thatthese C - atF ions or
The constructed wetlands and other control structures approved under the coastal stormwater permit
must be installed within one year of issuance of this permit for each respective outlet (#1-6). If this
can not be accomplishe the respective ditches installed thro gh the riparian zone are to be back-
filled and riparian zone re tored.
(note: This uld likely up-:
?they ain wi have iss
not ha the f ds to
otal project pletion.)
Chronology
the Neuse River Foundation because I be
stal Storm er mit. This ' also li ly
ip ment eir Storm ter PI in a timely f shit
April 11, 2000 - DWQ issued NOV for buffer violations
April 14, 2000 - Bob Chiles response for POA to April 11, 2000 NOV
May 26, 2000 - CAMA NOV and request to Cease Unauthorized Development
July 14, 2000 - additional information provided to Bill Moore from Bob Chiles

f't0 7 years

August 16, 2000 - additional Stormwater Management information provided to Bill Moore
October 30, 2000 - Bob Chiles explains that the WaRO received a "no-practical alternatives request" and
the RO did not respond Win 60 days. Thereby, the POA as meet the requirements of the Neuse buffenetc.
November 3, 2000 - Bob Chiles resubmits correspondences previously sent tof4ex Washington field office
as relates to the Stormwater Management Plan and request for a determination of "no practical alternatives" U 1?
November 6, 2000 - A copy was received, of Bob Chiles' "no practical alternatives request" dated: August
22, 2000.
November 10, 2000 - on hold "no practical alternatives" letter - info. request from Dorney
November 13, 2000- Bob Chiles response to John Dorney's November 10, 2000 letter.
November 20, 2000 - Meeting in Raleigh with Dick Goodwin, Tom Jones, Danny Smith, and Bob
Zarzecki.
November 27, 2000 - Mr. Dick Goodwin (complainant, resident, and Neuse River Foundation member)
discuss the POA's stormwater permit application dated May 9, 2000 etc.
November 28, 2000 - Mr. Dick Goodwin, (complainant, resident, and Neuse River Foundation member)
comments on POA's stormwater permit application, and comments on buffer violations dated April, 11,
2000.
November 28, 2000 - Nature Conservancy supports NC's Stormwater Management and Neuse River
Buffer Rules and opposes the issuance of any permits to Fairfield Harbour.
December 13, 2000 - DWQ site visit (WaRO, 401 Unit staff) - note: Neuse River Foundation was present
at the pre-meeting, but not during the site visit
December 13, 2000 - Letter from Southern Environmental Law Center -"express strong support for the
efforts of the Neuse Riverkeeper to ensure full compliance with existing permitting, buffer protection, and
pollution control requirements.
December 13, 2000 - Tom Jones letter to Deborah Sawyer objecting to be excluded (not invited by the
POA during) DWQ's site visit on December 13, 2000.
January 9, 2001 - letter thanking DWQ staff for the December 13, 2000 site visit.
January 16, 2001 - WaRO Notice of Violation
January 24, 2001 - Sierra Club oppose the issuance of any permits to Fairfield Harbour until the applicant
fully and completely complies with the sprit and intent of the Rules.
January 31, 2001 - Fairfield Harbour Response to January 26, 2001 letter
February 19, 2001 - Fairfield Harbour approval request for removal of sediment discharge
April 11, 2001 - WaRO approval letter for ditch-outlet clean up.
April 16, 2001 - Fairfield Harbor Redesigned Stormwater Plan
May 28, 2001 - Opposition letter to stormwater plan from Fairfield Harbor residents
May 30, 2001 - Neuse River Foundation letter : detailed concerns for DWQ consideration prior to the
issuance of a Coastal Stormwater Permit
September 4, 2001 - Mr. Goodwin (complainant)
-meeting between Bob Zarzecki, Danny Smith, Roger Thorp, and Bill Moore - Day of Tommy's goodbye
celebration - wetlands, 401 Cert. and wetland standards was the subject
August 6, 2001 - DWQ's additional information Request
August 23, 2001 - Response to DWQ's August 6" letter requesting additional information
August 27, 2001 - Fax from Tom Jones of the Neuse River Foundation. The fax provide a letter from the
Jim Scharbrough, President of the POA to Don Pollock Chairman of the POA indicating their intent to
modify the Stormwater Management plan once the DWQ issued their original plan.
September 4, 2001- Jim Goodwin - provides written comments regarding concerns with Stormwater
management and the continued presence of the ditches at Fairfield
Prior to September 17, 2001 - Danny Smith rec'd permission for POA to conduct a site visit . Also, Danny
Smith called the WaRO office left message for Bill Moore communicating the intended site visit.
September 17, 2001 - Dann6mith and Bob Zarzecki conduct site visit to determine areas of uplands,
potential wetlands and matrix of upland and wetlands necessary for an expeditious/ complete review of the
proposed nutrient management plan and appropriate Coastal Stormwater plan review.
Danny Smith phoned and left messages with Bill Moore on numerous occasions between September 17,
2000 and November 30, 2001. Danny Smith has yet to received a return phone call from Bill Moore.
September 24, 2001 - Danny Smith - emailed Bill Moore: Attached was providing a draft additional
information letter to the POA . (The email also notified Bill Moore of the onsite wetland information
collected by Danny Smith and Bob Zarzecki).
Danny Smith had not received a response regarding the September 24, 2001 email from the RO or voice
message left for Bill Moore.
November 12, 2001 - Nat Baggett of the Neuse River foundation called Danny Smith and explained
over the phone and followed up in an email that "our BOD (board of directors) was very concerned,
wanted more communication and in light of the lack of communication and had voted to file a 60 day
letter under the Clean Water Act".
November 26, 2001 - Danny Smith visit to WaRO for compliance presentation. It was explained to him
that by Bill Moore that he was ready to issue the Stormwater Permit. Time constraints prevented additional
discussions on that day. November 30, 2001-

request form Representative Alice Underhill
La
Facility Name Fuquay-Varina Sewer relocation lect Number Ol 1725
Project #
Project Type purpose of sewer line violation t : County, WAKE
Location UT Terrible Creek Fu ua -Varina County2
ago-
Received From APP T COE ID # , k 1, Region Raleigh
Received Date November 27, 2001 COE Susp Date Reg. Contact ; Charles Brown
-tit rr. .,........ ,,.,. , :. .•? _ :.,'?'i5 ... -..... , _ ,. . ... -:,
Sent to Region Date 11/28/2001 DCM Susp Date _
?.-- -- m
Rcvd Region Date TIP Number Payment Date" 11/27/2001
Last Action Date More Info Requested Amount Paid $201
Last Action More Info Received 77- Payor Engineering
titude (ddmmss) Mitigation ? NCheck #11800
y
Strea Ara Arch Le lH' L'
?e yFz tiarid Wetla> Stream Clas' An 7b s 'Vlietland (Baas) 'acres) (felt) ° (fei
Score
F ?I Impa Index Prim. r Class f;Appr.
R1• Apl
OY ON
WRP
, . hi?ation
oil 11
11111 Project INWetl!nd llanid etArea Lang h` rripletion ?Peren "Inter-?Nb Type Class .g'
Nber acres feet Subbslnfeet Subbsln
Mitlga um or L ) ( ?,??oate ", nial4? " m(ttent
T ?` I I I ?
't
? j ,' j
? ? ? ?:
L
TT
? N

Engineering
Consulting
Services,
Ltd.

?
d
?.

Vicinity Map
1999 Wake County N.C. Aerial Photograph - Parcel #
0667423753
Fuquay Varina Sanitary Sewer Property
RE NO.
3
ECS Project No.
839
f
.k

fi ;,
ENGINEERING CONSULTING S RVICE, LTD.
Fuquay Varina Sanitary Sewer Property
Fuquay Varina Sanitary Sewer Property
Fuquay Varina, North Carolina
A view of wetlands observed on the central/northern portion of the
sewer line.
sanitary
ENGINEERING CONSULTING SEIRVICE, LTD.
I I
V ~
W z A U.l ~ N _ ~ z
~ A z ~ M ~ ~ u ~ m o
w 1' _ 0 w ~ ~
J~ ~ o Jl ~ 9 ~ ~ ~ ~ W ~ ~ ~ ~ c
~ 1 ~ ~ ~ ~ Cq p~ ~ 0 u u ~ f,,, ~ ~
0 ~ ~ U h-~ ~ o0 ~ ~ 0 ~ Ow z H N 1~1 1`~1 a ~ N ~ ~ t- ~ ~ ,n Q
A U ~ Q~ - ~ h~~"" C7 w ~ to ~ Q1 Q o ~ a~
w u. ~ o ti Z ~ ~ W U~o~ z 0 ~ h ~ ~ Q~ i ~ t~ ~ ~m f-
~ } Q ~i0 ~ p ti~ U U W f~ ~ H „ a 3 a 0t~ ~ c ~
~ Q Ofd C7 ~ 0 V 1 A N ` Iii ~i ~ ~ - ~-i n tt ~ ~ ~t L ~ ~ U
p :o`'f „d 0 0 H ~ a,~3z ~ A w v ~
Z - `0
a ~ ~ W ~ ~ ~ 1 9 s cn ~ a ~ o ~ x ~ ~ L O 4.
~ r V ~ o o d ~ z a b ~ U1 0 ~ ~ 'Q z ~ ~ ~
C \ ~Qa ~P w O w ~ w a ~ H 9 ~ gE. U t7 M ~ a 11.t ~ ~
~ w > ~
0 „ d a ~ r~ W W ~ o ~ w A A Q ~
~H~ro ~ w> ~ w w 0
W~U~~~ 7 3 H ~~~~d > J
0 Oz NwA ~ ~WvwiO 0'O~w - ~ o ~ ,
z ~ W oWx ~ ~ N J Wa~aa,ww w E~~d
~ wF~~'a o 7 4 0~~ ~ O ~ ~
w W N W W ^
(i+ ¢ o ~
F ~ a ~
~ o o ? v w z a ~ ~ ~ u.
S 0 ~ o ~ > > ; ~ a ~ ~ A
, U ~ 0 4 7 1~ i
~
4 v~ ~ ~ v
i ~ r ~
o ~~4 ~ ~ J
J ^ ~ > a ~ lL s
l y ~ ~ ~ a ~ e
0 Q h ~ 1 J O ~ 0 d~ co r ~ ~ ~ 0 v m ~ m m m m ~ v
0 ~ ~ r M ~
Z ~ 1 Q ~ ,
7 Q
r A ~ ~ - Z'IL£ _ 'l3 WIC! - - - - -
~ ~ ~ - a' 370NNbW '151X3
~ 1 H ~ r
~k.
~ e m~ OC a
J~1d1 ~ 0
-or ~ ~ , ~~mz • 1 ~
iA
~ w~0!? J ~ ~ ~ r
i~ q , 0
~ ~ , ~ ~ ~ y~o r a ~
~ i • ; o 4
I ~ ~ ~ ~ I ~ / /
f ~ ~ ~ m~, 0'89£{ _ "13 WI~I l9£ = 1 'hNl
~l- ~ ~ N - ~ wro~ i i N~ a r c
m ~ J 3~I ~ ~ 0 cn ~ / / 1 3C1t~1~7 3~09d 31011N'dW = 9619£ I hNl
a ~ ~ 1 ~ ~
~ ~ ~ w I Q- ~ ~ zz ~ i
~ ~ i ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Q ~ , 9
° ~ 1 i ' ~ {n I ~ r--
~z ~ , zQ W
a m ~ mu, m
~o wFQ ~a ~ I o QO
~~W I a ,r ~J I , to
~ o I ~ ~ z w ~ ~ o , cA
-~Q ~ ~ 1 I ~WZ ~ , ~ - I r 0
_~na ~ ~ x Q ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
I i I ~ J W W ~ • 1 I ~ ~ `I V a
1 m~ - ll 1~;. ~ ,
II ~ ~ ~ s a to ~ 1. ~
~ ~ ~
~ a a I
~ ~ ~ J ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
'l _ - - ? ~ i 7 I
I ~ 7 ~ ~ ~ I J ~ ~ ~ e
I~ 9 I o, I ? ~ I
~ I ?n c a J~ ~ i ~ z m ~ J ~ ~ ~ lU W ~ ~ ~ ~V N 51
~ ~E ~(L ~ ~ ~ J m ~ ~ ~ ~ 50L£{ 13 WI~I _ ~ _
I t w Qo ~ ~ ~ aot~~ ~c i Vl 4Q cD ~ ~t~ 0 J d ~ 09 0 ~ £L'~9£ = I '~NI 3 t~ 3h 31 HNb'W
~y1 z ~ o L~ ~ v i ~ 4QC Jrm~ 7 Q

- z ~ ~ ~ 8
I N~ ~ ~ ~/zz '~j. ~ i • 4
~ ~ ~I J wl ~ N I ~
1? ~ N ~ o J ~I ~ ~ I• (/U~
~ o Q Q
_ ~ z ~ 1- . b,~ a
~ ~ -0 ~ Q . ~ ~ m~ w m
~ ~ JJ J~ ~ a i I , W v ~ r v ~ ~ , I
~ ~ ~ ~ ti' ` I ~
Y i ~ ~ N , I N~
I ~ f I
: ( ,n ~ Q `^w
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~Q. I
~ ~ 0 0 Q , ~
~ m
~ ! ~w v; 41-' ~
-W ~ a ~ ~ ~ ~0 com ~ ~m i ~ ~ ~ w - _55L£ _ '13 WIJ L'99£ = l 0 '/lNi
- , ~ 34'd~~ 3~09b 3'IOHNdW £8'99£ _ '/l I NI N 9
W~ •I I ~ ~ o Or I. N ~ a. z zm_~
I ~ I i 0
~@ -zz ~ I o
' Z I ~ o
a f / \ J
b ~ irn~ r~~ 1 I (Y w
7 ~ ~ ~ ,
6 o
I ~
`-L r- ~ / _ I / / 1 o e
- - - F-- - - - - ~ ui - - 1 ~ ~
( EXISANG SOIL PA iN _ OSSBLE DJOINE VERLAP _ -
~0
W w m I ~ lQ mr ~ w I
~ ~ 0 ~ m I
UJ~Q ' I
~ w w ~m ~w I Q Q. I ~ ~ z ~`~m~ _ z a~ ~ / ~ _58L£ _ '13 WI~1 1 14"89£ = 1 '~NI
\ ~w0 Or ~ 0 I ? Q ~ m? 0 . ~ I ~ 34~~ ~c Z ~ OC ~ z w~ v d ~ 09 W - - - E - • 3 b21 3~ d 3'10HNb 1589£ I ~NI 0
0' ~ w a d~» o I
p - ~ ~ -zz a. ~ I x a ~ a__ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~A wwa I
Z ________~0---_
r E1P W mw I
I I
w I ~ J ~ I I
I
QW~o a~'~
=o aQm~ I Q
o~ NW~d I z I w I r
W W~ ~ U W W, I w J
W ~j4f I ~"JZ _ _ - I Fa ~
_ -EIP I - ~ I z i I ~
~ I a f~ \ I
. N~ 1 ~ + o
I ~ w o I N~ Z 1 roi ~
o~ I o = a I \ a ~ I 9
o I ~ ' ~ S ~
~ ° I I N I ~ ~ r cn ® ~
~t I
~ 0~ ~ ~ I I
I ~;@
~ I 61r ~ o I warm
m I Jcvm~- ~W W i p~z
z3 ~ z w~°i~ I z~ , I ~ i
NW ~ ~W ^ I a-» ^o ~ oQ O, I ~~zz 1 ~ a z _
aw~a I
~ Jw z W Z ~ `NI I ~ ~Q i ~
~ ~w _ I
oo p(L I ~ U _5Z8£ _ '13 WIJ £'PJL£ = 1110 "~NI
~ o ~ ~ . J ~Cib'Z1~7 3/~G w ~ z ` ~ I 3Cib'z1~7 3~09G' 3'IONNbW I 94'0L£ = I '~NI
~ I
~ I ~ X
~ I \ \ acv I a~ I \ ` ~
\ m I ~t
E ~ ~ I _ ~
~ ~ ~ / i -
` I \ ; v ~ I
I ~ Q
~ ~ I \ I ~ / ' can
~ I ~ / ~w
I ~ h I ~ Qa ~o ~
~ I m ` M I w ~ ~ ~
~a I 0 x ~
Q~ ~ ~ v ~ ~ w ~ ~
9 / ~ N
0
wW ` W rm ~ ~ ~ ~ ` ` I .J~ \ ~ ~
~ ~W ~ ~ Omz~ p ~ z ~ 7cc~_ z \ ~p
\ z ~ ~ z' Q~ bz \ i i
~ ~ ~ 0 I
o N
\ a Z \ \ W -i ~ ~ \
\ O \ \ ~
~ ~ ~ r - P~ \ ~Q~~ £'16£ 13 WI J - - ~ - ~ 6l£ 1 0 "~NI
.v ti ~ 3C1'v'~~ 3~09V' 3~ONNbW _
v` ~ w
8 r
m ~ ~ 1 ~ W e
w ~m a Q ~
J~ cc1H Opz~ w / w = u I
~v_0 `n z ~A a
z~» a-zz Z , z
Q
@u
3 3N1'1 ?J31dm ..g
dS ..45
aD - 5104 = '13 WIJ L'£8£ = 1 '/lN1 0 - - -
3'tOHNb'W 0
9 ~ ~ ~ r ~ 9
0 9 ~ m r ~ ~ v ~ m ~ m ~

~ lu W W W W W ~ +s ~ p, ~ ~ 0 0
0 v? 0 u? 0 @ tr
0
MANHOLE ~ - ~
~ INY. T = 383.1 RIM EL. = 401.5
- 54" 5D
8" tUATER LINE 0 ~ (1 ~
r-
~D I D - ~ zzA~
~ z / - z ~D z
= z N Oz~~
rN I ~ _ m ! m c 00
~ 0~ ~ d 0 mw ~ ~~m w~,
u+ ~ w ~
i 0
0 m ~ ~
MANHOLE ABOVE GRADE ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ \ 1
- ~ - - - - ~ v INY, O T = 319 ~ ~ RIM EL. = 3913 ` V_ Y v ~ I \
f O \ \ \ ~ r m \ \
N f ~ ~
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Z ~ ~
~ ~ ~ ~ \ N ~ z \ \ za Z
~
\ \ zm zWI ~ Z m p C m0 ~ ~ ~ ~
/ ~I ~ A ~ v, ~
N0 i ~ ~ ~
U
m X ~c ~ 1 ~ ~ rN I ~ ~ 1
w ~ - N 0~ N Od I -0~
mW I ~ ~ I
0 ON i z / ~0 d ~ G~ I ~
m~ ~ ~ ~ ~
w ~ ~ ~ ` ~ I ~ I
d I ~ I p
I l~
i / ~ I \ I ~
\ I ~
~ ~ 0 N0
x X I lr ~ ~ ~ I ~
\ \ I
INv I 1 4 3 0. 6 _ MANHOLE ABOVE GRADE I N~ ~ , Zm \ _ ~ o r ~ ~
INY. OUT = 310.3 RIM EL. = 382.5 ~ I p cn a
n ~ I -00 o z,
r m ~ I ~m~~ ~ cn ~ ~ m ~,p ~ I ~ ~ n ~ ~ o z'~ n
n 1 z 0 •I• ~ m~ ~ v
~ - ~ mN U3~N ~ 3 I ~ Do c o..
~ Z n 1 zzA \ A ~N . {~~D I ~ ~ m
m t Z I o~z~ z m f~
1}1 ~ m J0 I D
0 ~ I
W~ I c0 ~ , ~
~w \ `p , i
~ ~ V' I ~ b w
/ c9 I v- S
0 v- I ~ o ~ I ~ ~o Z I ~ ~
z N~ ~ r- , ~ o NN I m0 I
0 N f ~J ~N
l D I ~
~ I W . ~ I d13---- - - - ~~o ~
I D I - ;~m i
m I ;Z.. z ~ I ~ °
I +m m ,i m z I a ono ov
0 mN - ~D
rn~~A Am I O~ZD
i i ~~z r~ ~
~ I
~ / t
1 w ~ I d13 ~-a
{ 1 I - m Z
zz~ 3 (p D X I ~e ~ -
Cv D D N 0 I ~ .0
~ INY. I = 368.51 _ I MANHOLE ABOVE GRADE r - - - - N ~ I cnm -u~i z3=~ r- 0 d z ~ (n Z~ Z I pN ~ ~,0 p z ~
INY. T = 368.41 I RIM EL. 318.5 I ~ d w r z W~~rm m N 0
I m~ ~ s m I ~ n ~
I ~ ~ p ~ ~
i I ~ Cp C ~ I w _ _ m rn
e _ _ _ - ddla3n 3NIOf0 3781SS0
~ ~ - ~ 0 - ~ ~ Hl vd 7lOS ONIl5fX3~ I .
~ ~ ~ , I
o / ~ 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ J ' ^
~ N ~ /I ~ I -
0d ~ '
m ~ , , ,M, l
cr ~o i
O ` z _ I~I
~ zz~ ~ m
0 <{~D 0 - i z ~ II
I -W ~ N
INV. IN = 366.83 ~ MANHOLE ABOVE GRADE - - - - ~ I m I I o x w r N = 00 I ~ -
INY. 0 ' T = 366.1 RIM EL. = 315.5 w~~m r I tl~N ~m N I ~ pd . 1 m- .
m o I ~ ~ w m ,
i
~ ~0 T /~~0~n ~ v
~ ~ ~1 ~
I mw d ~ c~ ~n I : ~
I I ~ ~ / i
0 ~ N r" u+ I I ~ I
00 r I c: ~ ~ per ~ ^ ~ I ~ i.
I ~ e O r- r f I e wr ~ ~
I ~ lo- I ~
o ~ r = ~'A D ~ c . Z ~ ~ l A .l N
~d i~, ~i i~ .i ~ f
I ~ , m~ o ~ ~ I ~ N ~
N W ( v+ F ' , ~ ~m A ~ ~ F ~
L I t r zZ1U3 ~ N
\ D «3z 0W m6 I
I ~ ~ ~i ~ .y ' 0 N i r~ ~ ~zw ~
I u z0
~ ~ ~ L ~ 1 ~,6~Om ° ~ mz q ~ ~C V' . 11 0 ~ o ~~r N ~ J 0~, DD ~
INV, i = 364.13 _ _ MANHOLE ABOVE GRADE ~ i~ ~ r U i
= RIM EL. = 13'105 W INV. 7 364 3 ~ m m ~1 ~ Od m ~ ~ ~ ~ A
~ x m ~ ~ / m ~ ~ < ~ I x ~ z o v? o ~
w ~ ~ I ~ ~ ~ - z - i .I
~ '1 0 ~ ~ ~ Ji ~ ~ r ~ I
L ~1 ~ ~ 2 ~ - z I o ~ Z
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ t~
~ ~ ~ o
~ t ~ ~ .
~ ~~l
m ~ ~ ~.I c. fi 1 - ~ 1 ~ ~ ~ a
~ 9 ~p I L ~ 1 0 I 7 ~ ~ I ; 1 Dx
~ D~'N
~ ~ o I ~ m ~l z I I ~ -
lp I r _ ~ dmz r _ N ~ a o ~ L N I z z
rN ~ an I
Od I m ~ ~ dim ,1 ~ 0
W 1 mw ~ f ~ ~
mA D Z
_ ~ ~ ~ Z\ i i cn ~
~ ~ I ~ o
0 . ~ ; ~ D ~ ~ ~
~ ~ zz~~ ~ ~ ~ r ~ ~ C -
t r 'I A / / ~ µ ~ f
INV. I = 361.96 MANHOLE ABOVE GRADE 5 i / ~ ~,0 ~ m a.
N L i i / ~r ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ m
INV. T = 361 RIM EL. = 1368.0 ~ ~ ~ .I ~1 o G 0 ~o ~ ~
I ~ c ~ i ~ ~ a ~ I ~
i ~ { ~ ~ ~ / / ~ ~~9~0
~ ~ ~ . I~ any ~I 1
0 ~
~ . I ~ i ~ ~ q '11 zA~m ~ t
= J a , o., ~r. -z~'
N . "L . zw ` _ -
0 , 4~wm
~ A ~ ~ a; mW a. - 6 ~ k~
cn ~ a N
J 1 I ~
1 EXISt. MANHOLE 8 - - - ~ ~ ~
RIM EL. = 3~1.~ ~ ~ 4 ~
d
m? ~ ~ _ ~ ~ m~ z
ti m D ~ ~
~1 ~ ~ ~
W W W W A ~ JJ W W W W ja O - ~l o ~ ~
0 ~ ~ l~ ~ l~ lP ~ 8 ~ ~ ~ ~
~~iro ~ ~ r Z b ~ i ~ ~ ~ r
~ r ~ > ~ ~ o
(c ~ ~ ~ o ~
" n
m d
~ ~ ~ r d ~ r 7~ o a C C 0 s
i, ~ ~ ~ ~ p ~ ~ ~ ~ ti
~ ~ ~ ~ o o~ z ~ ~a ~ ~ ~
~1
mm ~ d d ~d `'a Y Y y ~~o ~ ~ y ~ ~
"I Q u X10 y o ~ _ M I~f N~~
O r ~ 0 - a L o ~ y V1
.
c` ~o ~ ~ z ~ ~ - ~ o~ ~ o ~-y ~z ~ ~ ~
v+ V N Ccf [ " ~0 ~ o r~r~9 cry..
N „C ~~~xN~ ~ ~ ~ any ~~;o o~
O Crf Cti ~ C C7 ~ ~ cn H
m ~ ~ D~ d d bd~ ~'b N a ~ ~ Gi < ~ ~ c ~ 0 «n,,
~ ~ < ~ ~ ~C ~C w ~
D rn ~ ~ ~ r ~z r n 39 0 ~ y ~ ro ~
o ~ ~ , rn ~a m^p~
~ - N ~s N rn X. x l 1 0 ~ ? a Z
m N m n BZ ~ - r a z ~ ~ a,.. . ~ t~
~ ~ r ~ ~,0, 0 , m d z ~ ~ 0 0 ~ o: ~ _ $ 1~,
N~ ~ S n n o~,~,~ N ~ i 1a~ ~ ~ y ~ x ~ C ~ ~ A (/1 x ~ 0 y s •«~d
A N Q O NW?''~ lD , rn W ~Nn ro ~ m ~ n w D< O
o ~ tr1 ~ ~ AFC ~ ~ - o ~ ~C ~ ~ N z
~ N ~JoD ~ ~p r~ ~ ~~~y y ~ ` mm ~
r o~ z ~o~ ~ a ~ ~
D -u~~ d "'t N ~ l ~ 0 N W o a ~ °
~ ~ G N~ rn E ~ a r a Y ~ ~ o
~ ~ ~ n, ~ o n ~ r L ~ m 0 ~ ~ m
u W M ~ Z d r--- ~ A r
z ~ N rn w z
m

i ~
V ~
W z 4 ~ N ~ z
~ A z ~ ~ v o
~ ~ H 0 w ~ x ~ V c 3
~ ~ . H b W 4 ~ ~ ` ~i ~ Q
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ o ~ Ww ~ ~ W U~ 0 0 M ~ 0 ~v~ F- ~ ~ ~ ~
< A ~ Ow ~ ~ ~N
o N ~ a ~ U ~ ~ ~ >r ~ ~ ~Q o~'co ~ L ~ ~ V ~ ~Q cv ~ m
V1 u. ~ o ti ~ ~ W U ~ o ~ ~ 0 Q i 6~ ~ ~ ~ ~ LU cmvcA q,,t~~ 111
Z _ hr r/~ ~ W O ~ Q o ~ U U W 3 ~ ~ ~ N
~ Q CL ~ ~'`~r '~i N ~~~o U U t ~ 1~ J v
. ~ ~ ` :o`'~ ..d ~ 0 A ~ a~3z cn A w y H z H Opt •~x 'Q ~ r v ~ ~ = z 0 . ~ c~ Q
w Q~ ~ ~ a H
a - ~ ~ ~ 9 ~ s,v ~o ~z ~ o r1 x ~ ~ ~ Q1
~ r ~ ~ V ~ v p a •y d ~ z a b ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Q ~ ~ ~ a
~ ~ ~o ~p w 0 w ~ w N M a 9 U ~ ~ Zr ~ ~ Q lU ~ >
- ~ 8 c~ M ~ ~a~a C7 ~ o ~ ~ w ~ ~
~ > x 9 ¢a as x W ~ _ cJ ~ o a W w A A Q ~
~H~o ~ w> w w Q
WNx.,~~ ~
¢awNa N
~~vwi0 ~'O~F ~ _
W a z W ~ oWx ~ H N J Wa~awW w Hid ~
~ wF~~'a o 7 9 o~¢ ~ o ~ ~
Hw WN W W ^ w$ F~°h H
w ¢ o ~
~H A ~ A A p~. H ~ a ~ ~
Q~ z z ~ U h~ 0 0 ~ v '
~ ~ ~ ~ a ~ u, ti w~ ~
S o ~ o >
~ a ~ ~ 4 U A 7 a ~ o I
1~ ~
U v~ > ~ ~
r ~ ~ ~
a ~~4 ~ ~
J ~ ^ r "
0. ~ lL 9 ~ ~ ~ 0 ~ 0 ~ ~ @ ~ p
Q H ~ o 0 ~ ~ c0 r r ~ ~
La O ~ 1 M
~ ti ~ c
O ~ ~ Q ~ ~
~ d
~ P ~ ~ Q , ~ - - Z'IL£ _ "13 WI21 - - - - = 0
~ ~~oNNdw '181x3 ~
~ 1 w r
N h
W ~ ~ ~w ~ ~a
Wm~ ~ ~ ,a J~`Im ti ~ 0
- r ~ ~ ~ ~ m? ~ ~
Ex. ~ Z ~ ~ ~ ~ 12 SEVER ..p m X 4 ~ } ~ ~
z ~ 7 ~ w~ (K- r
~ i -@ 0
~ ~ ~ , ~ ~ / ~ ~ p I ~
~~o / ~ ~ ~b b ~ / / I i
~ / / / -
~ ~ ° ~ / / _ PJ'89£~ _ "13 Wl~i l9£ = 1 'ANI
~ / / N Wro~ / / N ~ a ~ c
~ r., ~ ~ ~ J 3 b21 3~ ,o m \ O m ~ / / 1 4 ~ 09 3"IOFiNdW 96'19£ = I '~NI 3 b21 3~ ~
a ~ / 1 ~ 1
Q- / / ~ w ~ ~,zz , \ i 0
J ~ / / ~ ~
Q I /
~ ~ ~ / / ~ ~ ~ ,
\z ~ / zQ w
mW m
~0 r W~p ~ Qo
~ I p
z z z q - ~ ~ o I ~ zW ~ ~ . o I - ~
_~L1 ro~ ~ f.- .l ~ ~ z ~ I r
Q xdm ~ i ~ 4 J
I J wwQ I :I I ~ ~
,n v Ill ~ Im - a I
l ~ ~ ~ ~ 1 ~ ~u~ J a 1. ~ ~
l~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
I- a a I- I
~ ~ ~ ~ J ~ ~ ~
~ ~ 4 ~ I
i '~7 i e
s ~ ~ a .I ~ ~ I m
~ I z m ~ x £ tr9£ = 1 '~NI
I1 w w i ~ ~ ~ cv 5c , 4 ~ g \ 5ml£3 _ '73 WIJ _ _ _
f w Qo m`~ ~ ~ l~ ~a~~ ~c 1 a ~ i h ~ ~ r~' ~ ~ ~ ~ £L'b9£ = I 'hNl ~Cib21~ 3/~09t/ 3~OtiN17W
Qd _ ~ v~ o ~ g IL -W tUo~ W~~ [ ~ ~ 7 ~ v >
~ ~t 0 mz ~ _ m, z ++-0 ~ ~ ~ ~ r ~ ~
0W m0 z~» Q ~ ~ ro Nzz J ''J 0
~ N~ ~IL_- U ~ ~ ~ L
~ ~ ~ i I ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ I ~ N I K1
J ~ w~ ~ l~ N ~ a ~ ~ ~ ~w Q
~t ~ 0 ~ a~ I
,S ~ ~ I F- u,I } nl ~ - y ~ b J
~ ' - @ ~ Q ~ ~ ~ W •
~ ~ ~m m , ~ ~ J, -J~ r I - ~Y
M ~ ~ ~
I ~ I ~ J f N
s~ N ~ ~ I ~ f
~ I F : ~ dl 1
~ Q mw ~ ~a ~
~ ~ 0 o Q
( m ~ ~ W ~
4~ I (Y z I. (L ~ 1
-w ~ Q ~ ~ c 0 5SL£ _ 'l3 WI?J L'99£ = 11'10 '/~NI
~ (Q I ' w ~m - - _ , ~ £8'99£ _ NI '~NI 3G1t~l~ 3~09d 3'IOHN~fW ~ 0
Xo ~I I ~ or w~ I. ~p ~ rt z _m_0
~ ~ I ~ I F}j 0
-0 ~ ~ ~~zz
o ~ s z
~ o ~
I f aw
'/gIYH.N ' r~~r~~~.~r~ I ~ ~
v ~ o
_ - - ~ ~ - I T~ 1
I ~ / 1 o e
I ~
.r.r - I EXISTING SOIL PAiH '-0 I m
- - OSSIBLE DJOINE VERLAP -
1i W w cn I
~ 0 ~ m I w~ta ' I I
~ w w m Qw I c Q ~ z ~~m QQ. I - z ,n ~ / ~ 58LE _ 'l3 WI~I j I~'89£ = 1 '/~NI - - - - i - _
\ ~ w 0 Or ~ ~0 I ~ ao ~ ~c ? Q zmz0 = ~ I 'v21 ~Ct'v21~ 3~09'd 3~OHN'dW 189£ I /~NI ~
Z ~ ~ ~ ~ z z ~ 0' Fwd ~~>y o I
O _ ~ ~ ~zz I ` ~ x ~ ~ I
~ wwQ I
_ _ m@ EIP I W
I 1 / j
w I J i
~ ~ I I
Qwm° i
a~ .oW^~. w =o °w`~ri Z
I W I r
w I ~ Z W~ I w 1
w ww~ i cp 4 F- H _ - I ~
odz _ _ - _.___EIP I F- z~ns _ - I Z
~ I Q f~ I ~
I I 0W o 1 ~
1 ~i o
I N~ O ~ I a _ ~ I ~ i I ~
S ~ '
o I ~ ~ I i N I r ~ I m~
\ ~ 0 I
o~ I
Q I 61r
~ w I Warm i
a o flj JNmI- I ~N w ~ti ~Z
i 111 ~
z3 w Z Wg°ie ~ I z w < w ~^w I • ~a w o~m ~ I \ (KZZ ~ ~ I z
"O ~ NWF4 N~ N J ~ I ~Q I ~
^W z m~~ ~ 'N, .I.- o ~ ~
Z~ ~ I ~ o Q m
oo pQ I < U _5Z8£ _ 'l3 WI?J 6mLE = 1110 '~NI
N ~ ~ ~0 I ~
~ ~ \ . ~ ~C1V'J~ 31~C wo ~ ~C1V'J~ 3/~09'd 310NNt1W = . 9~ 0L£ I ~NI
z ` ~ I ~ I ~ ~
~1 I ~ X
'W I ~ \ ~N (
0 I mp I \
~ I \ ~ ~ I ` ~ i
_ I y ~ I ~
I ~ a
~ ~ I I ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
~ / aW
I h I as / o ~
~ ~ ~ I mW fi
~ ~a I o I I Q~ X ~ ~
~ ~ ~ ~ w ~ ~
~ 4 ~ ~ ~ w 0 \ 9 / i
m ~ Qtr ~ ~ In
~ c~w ~ ~ 06~z~ ~ \ ~6
z ~ ~c ~
~ 0
o ~ ~ ~ ~
az ~
W ~ ~ ~ O ~ ~ / 6L£ = 1 0 '/~NI
~ + ~ ~ r - £'16E l3 WI?J i - - - - -
\ ` ~ \ ~Cl'v'ZI~ 3nc ~Cl'v'Z{~ 3~09'd 3lOHNb'W =
; ~ w a I
0
r ~ m 1 ~ w 0
m~ w,~ ~m Q a ~
~e ~ w / w ~ x u
O~z ~ 0 z ~ ,
Z~ Q-zz z z ~ LL I Q ~ ~
F~--
J ~ ~ 0~
3Nil J31b'm ..8
Gib ~~b5
510 _ 'l3 WIJ L'£8£ = 11'10 '/~NI 9 - -
~ 3lOFiNV'W 0
~ ~ @ ~ r @ ~ 9
~ m ~ m ~

_._390
EIP ON
LINE
-J
MIN 10 GAUGE
LINE WIRES
NCE
3'-0" SILT FENCE
MIN 12 1/2 INCH GAUGE •,y /�'\ ��-
INTERMEDIATE WIRES U y
ROUND SURFACE \
2'-0" MIN \
NOTE. PENMON DRIVE
SILT FENCE TO HAVE \ \
�y� 1 MINIMUM 12" COVER %O �R/ VII \
Co 0
WOOD\\`PHA SE T Wb\\ NSF
RY
1
NOT TO OASCALE T FENCE DETAIL ��� 1993 — P'g\ 6 71 h1GsePdaFi�/��^1.t'r I N G
\ N.F. RANSDALE
� f S D�'CTbL�U
gg 90 91
COIrTONWOOP PHA E THREE`see VC04 © �V / I EXISTING �FUJER
M.B. 19914 — P 7601 1 EXISTING SEUJER I TO BE RE OVED W. 367.14
/ / g I I EASEMENT TO BEI 1 EXISTING SEUJER N
/ ��
EASEMENT TO BE
ABANDONED
WVAER-fl ABANDONED
0 l I r �-�-- _ —." INV. 365.30
l I .. SEgER
qTp+ BANK96
II NH 04 o .11
+r..._ LI ITS OF w .. ""�„1 I"'°��—`
O / 1 EASEMENTAGE i RIM 31 S SEWELIMIT EASEMENT l I M.B. 1994 I INV. IN 366.83
M.B. 1994 / 1 Pg. 760 i INV. OUT 366.13 VIi MANHOLE "2
Pg. 760 RIl''f t3680
9
3 , / '"5
INV. OUT `3
—1 250' OF 8" SDR 35 ��
/ I I % I I I II I 080 io SLOPE 20 SANITARY *% N\
g,3 I 1 I SEWER EASEMENT
158' OF 8" SDR 35
080.9 F i8 SLOPE 5 a 0.61 io SLOPE
MANHOLE 01
RIM 3913 I 1 I 198' OF 8" SDR 35
I IN 31911 ' 1 / g I I 1 MANHOLE «3
' 1 I
9.0
IN UT 31 /' 300' OF 8" SDR 35 I -'"� � I
.
08 % SLOPE
I I RIM 1310.5INV.
' g 285 % SLOPE
\\ 31+' OF 8" SDR 35
0.5 % SLOPE
`II /
5
IN 364.13
1 j 1 INV. OUT 364.63 f
1 -S
24' PINE I
N CORNER EIP
0
I � l
rtit t�F Gtr G1
z ----� \ I
1 I I POND F}l� l �1 lTS OF �(IST'J C,t GI.E#a�1ti1C.� �1C�' TO CQK-
�/ vl
I
-
------------
+
I
^-(3d jCEl------
ELEA NOR WARD
--------------------------------- t
X ` , N,4q -T_
J
EUJE REASEMENT\ `
I / / `J01
I I 1
�i ode I 161' OF 8" SDR 35 1 � \
RIM 40L5 � i I I �' 285 io LOPE I /MANHOLE
INV.4 1B
INV. OUT 383.10 I / O RIM 362-5
Z+
INV. IN / 310.46 C') INV. OUT 31036 o I
"7
I / l
POND
1, �1
I I
8
.
1
6
5
0
qqQ
OC
Qa
OC
I�
(n
oI�
o Id)
6i
z
J
2
Q 01
Q c�
4 M
J
W
0 W
J
3:W
J
W
J
3:W
I
I
I
I
i
I
.
FINISHED
GRADE
1
I
I
I
EXIST
NG GRAD
CLEARANCE
CLEARANCE
19E
161
OF 8" SD
35
00' OF 8"
SDR 35
3 -le,
OF 8" SCR
35
85 SL
E
il
285 SLOPE
6 05
i, SLOFE
i
Z
z
Z
Z
Z
Z
Z
0.00 1400 2 400 3 400 4 400 5 400 6+00 1400 8400
MANHOLE "5
RIM 318.5
INV. IN 368.51
INV. OUT 368.41
DB. 2172 Pg.
W n1A
�,_ © rbc -Es
N
360.6
:mac nEop apvoo
� Fpew F1
��`I GS
EXISTING
MANHOLE 01
RIM 31123
INV. IN 3608
J�L
REVISIONS
A 10/24/01 REVISED TO MOVE LINE
AWAY FROM BUFFER
l 2/t Q�v(,.j 4?—S L"�v
t %
SEAL ! '
10361
`yi ��'Gt lEEEQ` o
MES
ENGINEERING CONSULTING SERVICES, LTD.
PO BOX 12015
RESEARCH TRIANGLE PARK, NC 27709
PHONE: [phone]
FAX: [phone]
Email: bwilsonCecslimited.com
PROJECT:
FUQUAY VARINA OUTFALL
SEDIMENT CONTROL
AND BUFFER RESTORATION
CLIENT: PROJECT LOCATION:
TOWN OF FUQUAY VARINA Main Street — Fuquay Varina
C/O MAIN STREET STATION LIMITED PARTNERSHIP Wake County
100 EAST SYBELIA AVE. North Carolina
SUITE 225
MAITLAND, FLA 32751
ORIGINAL DATE: DRAWN BY: SCALE:
December 14, 2001 BVW Noted
REVISION DATE: REVISED BY: DRAWING NUMBER:
REVISION DATE: REVISED BY:
l3psUL jFLLL t PLl I ol L -S
2 r2 PQoc-Td 2�
a47' -P 1 CE O
1 OF 1
ECS PROJECT NUMBER:
2839-A
LODESTAR FROPERTIES
181 North Harbor Drive, Suite rz
Davidson, North Carolina 28036
[phone]
fax C�04) 892-6110
FREELAND and KAUFFMAN, INC.
Fng'Ineers , Landscape Architects
209 West Stone Avenue
Greenville, South Carolina 29609
864-233-5491
fax [phone]
OFFSITE SANITARY
61EWER PROFILES
MAIN STREET STATION
RKQl1AY MARINA NORM CAROLINA
Drawn SNF K Job 99049 Drawing
C eck SKS Date 11/30/99 1&of 2 E

REVISIONS
I 10/24/01 REVISED TO MOVE LINE
8' MAXIMUM SILT FENCE AIUAY FROM BUFFER
2 t 2~ ~ l (i'~ Q,V~ C S l,T~
MIN 10 GAUCE 3~_0- SILT FENCE 5 u ~
UNE WIRES ~o
MIN 12 i/2 INCH GAUGE INTERMEDIATE WIRES p~r,10 t~l of ~ z s
GROUND SURFACE ~S~It, 7
2'-0' MIN D~
E ti ~ (
ND~: PENMON DR/VE SILT FENCE TO HAVE ~ MINIMUM 12" COVER 50 R/W ~ I SE'At '
1~3 ~ ~ I 1 10361 ~ NF
c~ l3
TEMPORARY SILT FENCE DETAIL ~ NOT TO SCALE ~ ` ~ ~ RANSDALE y, '~GrltEE• ~ ~ N.F. +~I ,~u~o2p l N 5~,, t~ G q L
_ , ~ I ~ .1993 P . 6 71 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ N Y. ~
~ ~ t~ T 5~ ,I
i i i ~ I
/ ~ i I
~ ~ ~ i EXISTINCx s~ awl © P ~ EXISTING `IrIUER °Jt~
~ _ I i EXISTING SEWER I TO BE RE TO BE RE mVED I x 0 bm 120 ~ I EXISTING SEUJER N
M.B. 199 Pg. 760, / i ~ ti EASEMENT TO BED _ IN b s ,N ~ i EASEMENT TO BE p
/ i i i ABANDONED ' / / I ~ ~ ~ ~ ABANDONED ~ 8CALE 1" N bm' 1
~ i 7 ~ I ~ a l ~
~ / I I / ~ 1 ~ / , / ~ { ~ I ~ 1 i NIY. J65.J0 ~ c~ ~
/ I r' I ~ w~ y~~ . g: / ~ ` ~rr.p
/ i~ i ~ ~ mi / i ~ o ~ ~ , _ ` - . - ara+ s~ . - ENGINEERING CONSULTING SERVICES, LTD.
~ ~ . M~• o ~ ~ . - = Q~N~~ PO BOX 12015 ~ ~ ~ - ~ t ~ GLE PARK NC 27709 RESEARCH TRIAN ,
/ / ~ ~ 20' oRArNACE ~ MANHOLE 4 ~ ~ _ I ITS OF ~ ~ ..rN.... L . _ ~IMIj 6b G~ O 1 -544-1735
/ / t I EASEMENT ~ RIM 3755 I < / / 20' SEWER 1 ~ M.B. 1994 ~ INY. IN 366.83 A I~ - - ~,..r„30 BUFFER PHONE. 9 9 _ ' ~ FAX: [phone]
/ / EASEMENT 760 ~ - M MOLE "2 Email; bwilsonCecslimited.com
/ / / M.B. 1994 P9 ~ iNV. OUT 366.13 , ~ / / / Pg. 760 ~ I U ' I / RI 1368.0
i 1 ~ ~ I l s113fi / ~ I ~ ~ I - ~ INV'. IN-361.96 T; ~ PROJEC
3 ~ I I 8S I I I ~ ~ ~ ~ I I ' -f 250 OF f 250' OF 8" SOR 35 20' SANITARY
~ ~ ~ I, ~ I I m.8m ~o 0.8m SLOPE SEIUER EASEMENT ~ s
~ 1 I f I i J ~ ~ ~ I `I f ~ ~ ~
i A~ ~ ~ ~ I 1 ' OF 8" SDR 35 ~ 283 OF 8 SDR 35 58 ~ ~
~ f t I f / ~ I I MANHOLE "1 / ~ i ~ I I j l ~ 0.94 °r, SLOPE ~ 0bl ~o SLOPE
RIM 3913 ~ ~ i ~ I I I 198' OF 8" SDR ' OF 8" SDR 35 MANHOLE *3 ~``~'o
_-390 I . IN 319.11 ~ ~ ~ I g ms so SLOPE IN Ut 319.01 / 300' OF 8" SDR 35 ~ i I I ~8 qo SLOPE RIM t3~0.5 NY. 78U.6 PROJECT LOCATION: CLIENT:
g 2.85 qo SLOPE ~ ~ 31 ' OF 8" SDR 35 I I INV. IN 364.13 ~ TOWN OF FUQUAY VARINA Main Street - Fuquay Varina INV. OUT 364b3 I
EIP ON / ~ ~ g q, I 0 I LINE 24' PINE I ~ SL PE I t-~tit ~F G~,Q~,Jc~ ~FJE Zo ~~M~nJ~ GO MAIN STREET STATION LIMITED PARTNERSHIP Wake County
I ~ ` N CNRNEa EIP / / / ~ I f I ~ ~"l~Ll. 5l~ FIrTIC~ ~,rJ 1~~/~ I 100 EAST SYBELIA AVE. North Carolina
~ mi rn~ ---J I I POND 1~t1.1, l,i~ lTS of ~clsT~^I c,~ ct.E~~~.l ~~cj' Ta cQ~"K. fx ~ , SUITE22s ~ z SF MAITLAND, FLA 32751
i ~ ~ I I I I i i-- I EI I I ~ I ~ ~ P~JC ~ SCALE: b ORIGINAL DATE: DRAWN BY:
i NOR WARD ELEA December 14 2001 BVW Noted
i i~ ~ I 7 P . 6 EXISTING DB. 21 2 g MANHOLE ~ .
- J / / i REVISION DATE. REVISED BY: DRAWING NUMBER: RIM 3'11.23
~ X 2m SANIT i i ~ SEWE ASEMENT\ INV. IN 360b 1 OF 1
~ i ~ i ~ / ,'r- . REVISION DATE: REVISED BY: ECS PROJECT NUMBER:
~ ~ ~ 83
i i ~ i 5 MANHOLE i i ~ ~ ~ RIM 3185
i i I I61' OF 8" SDR 35 ~ N 36851 MANHOLE "8• ~ ~ ~ ~ INV. I JY. IN 368.51 ^~~ir NthtJ
2B5 o LOPE I I 4015 i I k INY. OUT 368: RM I JY. OUT 368.41 ~ . _ .
I Y. IN 83.80 ' MANHOLE I Y U 383.10 I 0 RIM 3825 Z .0 I ` . ~t~l, wt~ t;"XtS~~, Fl~~i~solt.S ~~~F~I~~ w~~~~r~~ r~
~ INV. IN 310.46 ~ ~i ~ c _ vU2o•s'GQ. PIPS ~ ~
( / INV. OUT 31036 ~ o ,38 I 1 ~ ~ r
S~ it D v • L Oft M%~`~. (~+N ~ ~~.rrt~ ~ ~o~f T
I z p N j f i/ Y
02 ~ Cs~.,o~a. r~ T ~
( ~ t ~ so4t.5 uttoJ~ I ~)M~ o~ .pl~E ~O m~ Ex S~, rJ~ ~~J ~ ~ µ i ~
I I X 1 1 w ~ ~~c~.~'C~ ~ - -a , y1i ~I~~tL~.
1 I ~ ~1 a E PtP~
~ 1 / ~
I / POND 1~,
I
~ ~~ES
I i ~ P~t~G~ -/1 (cll. lp ~oa_. E L
I , Ctso-r To
. ~ lam.,
I I
1 ~ . ~
I
I I
. 2 1
6 5 4 8 1 4 3
W W W w p w w w 0 p 0
p p
~ ~ ~
~ ~ ~ 9 w
w ? I~ o ~ ~ I o~ 0 h
w I I o. z ~ 0 ~ cA ~ 0 ~ 9 m ~ - ldm m ~
0 ~ Qm Q~ Q,~ Qm `r !X m ~ W M W n 4r d 4 m w w N N
Ill n w W„ ~ u J J p ~ N J
p~ ~ p ~ p ~ 0 ~ ~~Q 0~ xw iw ~w 0~ 0~ 0~ zw zw zw ~w
W. ~ iw z z z z z Z~ X~
~ Q~ Q~ Q~ Q ~ Q ~ Q _ - - wtr ~ ~ 405
la 405
I FINISHED GRADE 400
4m©
I I t( 5
5 t 39 5 I
395
181 North Harbor prive, Suite ~
pavideon, North Carolina 28036
390 ~ fax [phone]
EXIST NG GRAD
10' IN. ~ 385
CLEARANCE 385
I I
~ I I 380
380 \
\ 7-
315
CLEA NCE ' I I
I • _ FREELAND and K?4l,FFMAN, INC.
. ~ 310 Enylneers Landscepe 41-chitects
310 ' - 109 West Stone Avenue
- - - - - - - - Greenville, South Carolina 29609
864-233-5491
fax [phone]
365 365
198' 8" SDR 5 250' OF " SDR 35
161, OF 8" SD 35 00' OF 8" SDR 35 -310' OF 8" SCR 35 08 o SLOPE 0.8 q, LOPE
0S 9o SLO ® .85 % SLO=E 2.85 % SLOPE 0% 360
360 - ~ r m r`)- 1 %R
M m v, 61 ~ ~ ~ 191' 8" SD 35 - 18' OF 8" $ R 35 ~ ~ 5 r, SLO ~ I
r. r g ~ ~ I I -0 0,61 % S OPE
r N Al r K1 N N N f- N ~ N N - O -
_Z
l z z z z z z z z > > z z z z z z - - -I- f I ke..vff6ITE 5ANITARY
12+00 13+00 14+00 15+00 16+00 11+00
0+00 1+00 2+00 3400 4+00 5+00 6+00 '1400 8400 9 0 1000 1000 11+00 h 6EWER Pmt,/rILE5 h
STATION MAIN STET
FUMAY VARINA NORM CARXINA
Drawn &IF FK Job Drawing 99fA49
2E~
Check W's Date 1lwm iroof