20070465 Ver 1_Application_20070315

Office Lse Onh-: O ~ Form V~ersi~o~njMarch OS
LSACE Action ID \o. DWQ No. ®~ `~' `-'
(If any particular item is not applicable to this project. please enter "Not Applicable"
I. Processing

1. Check all of the approval(s) requested for this project: _
~] Section 404 Permit ^ Riparian or W atershed BwufRules"'o ~ ~~;
^ Section 10 Permit ^ Isolated Wetland Permit from DWQ
® 401 Water Quality Certification ^ Express 401 Water Quality Certification
?. Nationwide, Regional or General Permit Number(s) Requested: NWP 14
If this notification is solely a courtesy copy because written approval for the 401 Certification
is not required. check here: ^
4. It payment into the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program (NCEEP) is proposed
for mitigation of impacts, attach the acceptance letter from NCEEP, complete section VIII,
and check here: ^
If your project is located iri any of North Carolina's twenty coastal counties (listed on page
4), and the project is within a North Carolina Division of Coastal Management Area of
Environmental Concern (see the top of page ?for further details), check here: ^
II. Applicant Information
1. Owner- Applicant Information
Name:~ North Carolina Department of Transportation
'~failin~ Address: P.O. Box 1587
Greenville NC 27835
Telephone Number: 252-830-3490 Fax Number: 252-830-3341
E-mail Address:
?. Agent%Consultant Information (A signed and dated copy of the Agent Authorization letter
must be attached if the Agent has signatory authority for the owner/applicant.)
Name: Jav B. Johnson
Company Affiliation: Division 2 Environmental Officer
Mailing Address: P.O. Box 1587
Greenville. NC 27835
Telephone Number: 252-830-3490 Fax Number: 252-830-3 "`~'~ i~•4'
E-mail Address: 'b"ohnson~dotstate.nc.us "°=' ° /~~Y
u~~ 1 ulaoos r~~~'~~'' ~;,~ t~~q;;< ~, . ~~~
,,
Page 5 of 13 r~R~.~q x~RB~k
C.y

III. Project Information
:attach a vicinity map clearly showing the location of the property with respect to local
landmarks such as towns, rivers, and roads. Also provide a detailed site plan showing property
boundaries and development plans in relation to surrounding properties. Both the vicinity map
and site plan must include a scale and north arrow. The specific footprints of all buildings,
impervious surfaces, or other facilities must be included. If possible, the maps and plans should
include the appropriate L SGS Topographic Quad Map and MRCS Soil Survey with the property
boundaries outlined. Plan drawings, or other maps maybe included at the applicant's discretion,
so tong as the property is clearly defined. For administrative and distribution purposes, the
L SACE requires information to be submitted on sheets no larger than 11 by 17-inch format;
however. DWQ may accept paperwork of any size. DWQ prefers full-size construction
drawings rather than a sequential sheet version of the full-size plans. If full-size plans are
reduced to a =mail scale such u'~at the final version is ille`ible, the applicant will be informed that
the project has been pissed on hold until decipherable maps are provided.
i. dame of project. SR 193. Keys Road Pipe Replacement Beaufort County
?. T.LP. Project Number or State Project Number (NCDOT Only):
3. Propem Identification Number (Tax PIN): N/A
~. Location
County: Beaufort Nearest Town: Cox's Crossroads
Subdivision name (include phase/lot number):
Directions to site include road numbers/names, landmarks, etc.): From Cox's Crossroads.
(intersection of SR 1100 and NC 33)proceed North on Sr 1100 for 1.5 miles. Sr 1953.
Keys Road will be on the right.
~. Site coordinates (For linear projects, such as a road or utility line, attach a sheet that
separately- lists the coordinates for each crossing of a distinct waterbody.)
Decimal Degrees (o digits minimum): 3.3893 °N 76.9415 °V~%
6. Property size (acres): N/A
7. Name of nearest receiving body of water: Herring Run
S. River Basin: Tar-Pamlico
(Note -this must be one of North Carolina's seventeen designated major river basins. The
River Basin map is available at http:i.h2o.enr.state.nc.us/admin/maps/.)
9. Describe the existing conditions on the site and general land use in the vicinity of the project
at the time of this application: Existing unpaved secondary road and pine in a rural
a~riculturaUforested area.
1 U.
t;paatea t t; i. ^oos
Page 6 of 13

11. Descrbe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
Pipe Replacement with typical road construction equipment
12. Explain the purpose of the proposed work: Pipe Replacement
I~~. Prior Project History
If jurisdictional determinations and/or permits have been requested and/or obtained for this
project (including all prior phases of the same subdivision) in the past, please explain. Include
the L SACS Action ID Number, DWQ Project dumber. application date, and date permits and
certifications were issued or withdrawn. Provide photocopies of previously issued permits.
certincations or other useful information. Describe previously approved wetland, stream and
buffer impacts. along with associated mitigation (where applicable). If this is a NCDOT project.
fist and describe permits issued for prior segments of the same T.LP. project, along with
construction schedules. There are no other sites on this project that require a permit
Construction to be performed in 2007
v. Future Project Plans
Are any future permit requests anticipated for this project'? If so, describe the anticipated work,
and provide justification for the exclusion of this work from the current application.
~Z. Proposed Impacts to Waters of the United States/Waters of the State
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
wetlands. open water, and stream channels associated with the project. Each impact must be
listed separately in the tables below (e.g., culvert installation should be listed separately from
riprap dissipater pads). Be sure to indicate if an impact is temporary. All proposed impacts.
permanent and temporary, must be listed, and must be labeled and clearly identifiable on an
accompanying site plan. All wetlands and waters, and all streams (intermittent and perennial)
should be shown on a delineation map, whether or not impacts are proposed to these systems.
Wetland and stream evaluation and delineation forms should be included as appropriate.
Photographs maybe included at the applicant's discretion. If this proposed impact is strictly for
wetland or stream mitigation, list and describe the impact in Section VIII below. If additional
space is needed for listing or description, please attach a separate sheet.
1. Provide a written description of the proposed impacts: Fill will be placed in the wetlands
for roadway and shoulder construction. The fill will be vegetated as soon as possible to
provide slope stabilization.
Updated llil/2005
Page 7 of 13

~. Individually list «-etland impacts. Types of impacts include, but are not limited to
mechanized clearing=. grading, till. excavation, flooding, ditching/drainage, etc. For dams,
separately list impacts due to both structure and tloodin~.
Wetland Impact ~
Site Number
(indicate on map)
Type of Impact Tvpe of Wetland
(e.s.. forested, marsh,
herbaceous, bog, etc.) Located within
100-year
Floodplain
(yes/no) Distance to
Nearest
Stream
(linear feet) Area of
Impact
(acres)
Area 1 j Fill Forested Yes <50' 186 SF
.-area ? j Fill Forested ~ Yes X50' 34 SF
Area 3 ;Fill Forested Yes <50 60 SF
Area 4 I Fill Forested Yes X50' 130 SF
i

Total ATV"etland Impact i acres) 410 Square Feet 0.009
List the total acreage (estimated) of all existing «~etlands on the property: N/A
4. Individually list all intermittent and perennial stream impacts. Be sure to identify temporary
impacts. Stream impacr~s include, but are not limited to placement of fill or culverts, dam
construction, flooding, relocation, stabilization activities (e.g., cement walls, rip-rap, crib
walls, gabions, etc.). excavation, ditching/straightening, etc. If stream relocation is proposed,
plans and profiles sho«-ing the linear footprint for both the original and relocated streams
must be included. To calculate acreage, multiply length X width, then divide by 43,560.
None
Stream Impact I
Number Stream Name Type of Impact
(indicate on map)
Perennial or
Intermittent? Average
Stream Width
Before Impact Impact
Length
(linear feet) Area of
Impact
(acres)
I 8 0.00046
I

i

Total Stream Impact (by length and acreage) 8 0.00046
~. Individually list all open water impacts (including lakes, ponds, estuaries, sounds, Atlantic
Ocean and any other water of the U.S.). Open water impacts include, but are not limited to
fill_ excavation_ dredQina_ fl~odin~_ drainage, bulkheads. etc.
Opea Water Impact Type of Waterbody Area of
Site Number ~ Name of Waterbody Tvpe of Impact (lake, pond, estuary, sound, bay, Impact
j (if applicable)
(indicate on ma)
ocean, etc.)
(acres)
I I Trib. Of Herring Run Excavation Stream 8 Lin.
1 Trib. Of Hemn~ Run Excavation Stream 8 Lin. I
Ft
i
i
lipdatad lii1;2005
Page 8 of 13

?-,tal Open «-ate: Impact (acres) 4 Square Feet 0.000' '.
6. List the cumulative impact to all Waters of the U.S. resulting from the project:
Stream Impact (acres): 8'
`~"etland Impact (acres): ~ 0
Open Water Impact (acres): 0
Total Impact to Waters of the U.S. (acres) ~ 0
Total Stream Impact (linear feet): I 0
solated ~~-aters
Do any isolated waters exist on the property? ^ Yes ®No
Describe sll impacts to isolated waters, and include the type of water (wetland or stream) and
she size of the proposed impact (acres or linear feet). Please note that this section only
applies t~~ waters that have specifically been determined to be isolated by the USACE.
8. Pond Creation `i a
If construction of a pond is proposed, associated wetland and stream impacts should be
included above in the wetland and stream impact sections. Also, the proposed pond should
be described here and illustrated on any maps included with this application.
Pond to be created in (check all that apply): ^ uplands ^ stream ^ wetlands
Describe the method of construction (e.g., datn~'embankment, excavation, installation of
draw-do«~ valve or spillway, etc.):
Proposed use or purpose of pond (e.g., livestock watering, irrigation, aesthetic, trout pond.
local stornwater requirement, etc.):
Current lend use in the vicinity of the pond:
Size of watershed draining to pond: Expected pond surface area:
~-II. Impsct Justification (avoidance and Minimization)
Specifically describe measures taken to avoid the proposed impacts. It may be useful to provide
information related to site constraints such as topography, building ordinances, accessibility, and
financial viability of the project. The applicant may attach drawings of alternative, lower-impact
site layouts, and explain why these design options were not feasible. Also discuss how impacts
were minimized once the desired site plan was developed. If applicable, discuss construction
techniques to be followed during construction to reduce impacts.
40=1 Wetlands are to be filled to facilitate an adequate slope to maintain vegetation instead
of Rip Rap in the Stream Buffer Zone.
`"III. Mitigation
D~~'Q - In accordance with 1 ~A NCAC 2H .0500, mitigation may be required by the NC
Division of «~ater Quality for projects involving greater than or equal to one acre of impacts to
l..~p3aced i ~ i r_ous
Page 9 of 13

'freshwater wetlands or greater than or equal to 1 ~0 linear feet of total impacts to perennial
streams.
li SACE - In accordance with the Final Notice of Issuance and Modification of Nationwide
Permits. published in the Federal Register on January 1 ~, 2002, mitigation will be required when
necessary to ensure that adverse effects to the aquatic environment are minimal. Factors
including size and type of proposed impact and function and relative value of the impacted
aquatic resource will be considered in determining acceptability of appropriate and practicable
mitigation as proposed. Examples of mitigation that may be appropriate and practicable include.
but are not limited to: reducing the size of the project; establishing and maintaining wetland
and; or upland vegetated buffers to protect open waters such as streams; and replacing losses of
aquatic resource functions and values by creating, restoring, enhancing, or preserving similar
functions and values. preferable in the same watershed.
if mitigation is required for this project, a copy of the mitigation plan must be attached in order
for L'S.-SCE or D`VQ to consider the application complete for processing. Any application
iac'.:ing a required mitigation plan or NCEEP concurrence shall be placed on hold as incomplete.
An applicant may also choose to review the current guidelines for stream restoration in DWQ's
Draft Technical Guide for Stream Work in North Carolina (see DWQ website for most current
version.).
1. Provide a brief description of the proposed mitigation plan. The description should provide
as much information as possible, including, but not limited to: site location (attach directions
and/or map, if offsite), affected stream and river basin, type and amount (acreage/linear feet)
of mitigation proposed (restoration, enhancement, creation. or preservation), a plan view,
preservation mechanism (e.g., deed restrictions. conservation easement, etc.), and a
description of the current site conditions and proposed method of construction. Please attach
a separate sheet if more space is needed.
There is 410 Square Feet (0.009 Acres) of 404 Wetland Impacts. Onsite mitigation
(restoration) covers an area of 473 Square Feet (0.01 Acres), thus leaving a miti~adon
credit to NCDOT of 63 Square Feet (0.001 Acres). This will negate all 404 Wetland
Impacts.
2. :Mitigation may also be made by payment into the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement
Program (NCEEP). Please note it is the applicant's responsibility to contact the NCEEP at
(919) 71 ~-0476 to determine availability, and written approval from the NCEEP indicating
that they are will to accept payment for the mitigation must be attached to this form. For
additional information regarding the application process for the NCEEP, check the NCEEP
website at http: /www.nceep.net/paaes/inlieurenlace.htm. If use of the NCEEP is proposed.
please check the appropriate box on page five and provide the following information:
mount of stream mitigation requested (linear feet):,
Amount of buffer mitigation requested (square feet):
t~t~a ! is t:aaos
Page 10 of 13

_~triount ofNon-riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres):
Amount of Coastal wetland mitigation requested (acres):
LX. Environmental Documentation (required by DWQ)
1. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the use of
public (federalistate) Land? Yes ® No ^
?. If yes, does the project require preparation of an environmental document pursuant to the
requirements of the National or North Carolina Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
Note: If you are not sure whether a NEPA/SEPA document is required, call the SEPA
coordinator at (919) 73 ~-~ 083 to review current thresholds for environmental documentation.
Yes i i No
~. If ves. has the document review been finalized by the State Clearinghouse? If so. please
attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval Letter. Yes ^ No ^
t. Proposed Impacts on Riparian and Watershed Buffers (required by DWQ)
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
required state and local buffers associated with the project. The applicant must also provide
justification for these impacts in Section VII above. All proposed impacts must be listed herein,
and must be clearly identifiable on the accompanying site plan. All buffers must be shown on a
map, whether or not impacts are proposed to the buffers. Correspondence from the DWQ
Regional Otiice may be included as appropriate. Photographs may also be included at the
applicant's discretion.
1. Will the project impact protected riparian buffers identified within 15A NCAC 2B .0233
(Meuse}. 1 ~A NC_~C 2B .0259 (Tar-Pamlico), 1 ~ A NCAC 02B .0243 (Catawba) 15A NCAC
2B .02~~7 (Randleman Rules and Water Supply Buffer Requirements), or other (please
identify Tar-Pamlico )'? Yes ® No ^
?. If "ves'', identify the square feet and acreage of impact to each zone of the riparian buffers.
If buffer mitigation is required calculate the required amount of mitigation by applying the
buffer multipliers.
* ~ Impact
i Zone i
i (s uare feet)
Multiplier Required

Miti ation
i I i 3 (2 for Catawba)
2 i 1.~
j Total
[.one t extends out 30 feet perpendicular from the top of the near bank of channel; Zone 2 extends an
aeditional 20 teet from the edge of Zone 1.
~. If buffer mitigation is required, please discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (i.e.,
Donation of Property, Riparian Buffer Restoration /Enhancement, or Payment into the
Riparian Buffer Restoration Fund). Please attach all appropriate information as identified
t;~tea t tit~aoos
Page 11 of 13

Riparian Buffer Restoration Fund). Please attach all appropriate information as identified
«~ithin l~A NCAC 2B .0242 or .0244, or .0260. This is a Pipe Replacement Project. All
buffer impacts are under the 40 linear foot threshhold.
XI. Stormwater (required by DWQ)
Describe impervious acreage (existing and proposed) versus total acreage on the site. Discuss
storm~vater controls proposed in order to protect surface waters and wetlands downstream from
the property. If percent impervious surface exceeds 20%, please provide calculations
demonstrating total proposed impervious level.The existing ditches will dissipate water flow
into the adjacent wetlands and not directly into the tributary of Herring Run. Stormwater
~~~ill sheet flow over the vegetated roadway shoulder into the wetlands in those areas where
no uplands exist to construct road side ditches.
XII. Sewage Disposal (required by DWQ)
Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of
wastewater generated from the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
ti one
XIII. ~"iolations (required by DWQ)
Is this site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (1 ~A NCAC 2H .0500) or any Buffer Rules?
Yes ^ No
Is this anafter-the-fact permit application'' Yes ^ Rio ^
XIS". Cumulative Impacts (required by DWQ)
Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in additional
development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality? Yes ^ No
If yes, please submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with
the most recent North Carolina Division of Water Quality policy posted on our website at
http: ~;h?o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands. If no, please provide a short narrative description:
X~". Other Circumstances (Optional):
It is the applicant's responsibility to submit the application sufficiently in advance of desired
construction dates to allow processing time for these permits. However, an applicant may
choose to list constraints associated with construction or sequencing that may impose limits on
u~ i i ~ zoos
Page 12 of 13

wore schedules (e.g., dra~z--down schedules for lakes, dates associated with Endangered and
Threatened Species, accessibility problems, or other issues outside of the applicant's control).

Appli~~htl:~gent's Signatuf
(Agent's signature is valid only if an
/ 'Date "
letter from the applicant is provided.)
~~~~~a i ~: i,~zoos
Page 13 of 13

ILEY S ROAD SR 1953 MITIGATION SITE
FLVAL MITIGATION PLANNING REPORT
North Carolina Department or Transportation
Division of Highways
P.O. Bog 1587
Greenville, NC 27835-1587
Issued: February 2007

1.0 L'~RI"RODti CT'TON & GO ALS
T'ne NCDOT proposes to construct 404 wetland compensatory mitigation site at the
culvert replacement site located on SR 1953 Keys Rd. in Beaufort County, North
Carolina. This site will be used as compensatory wetland mitigation for impacts planned
(.OI acres} for the pipe replacement and road widening on SR 1953. A 1:1 wetland
mitigation ratio on .0 i acres of wetland impacts (Restoration) was a requirement by the
L S Army Corps of Engineers.
The n•~itigation concept for this site focuses on restoration of 404 wetlands onsite in kind
of where the impacts are taking place. Therefore, this project has been designed to include
the following components; 1) Excavating historic spoil built up in 404 wetlands to
appropriate elevations for the establishment of targeted adjacent 404-wetland elevation.
2.0 PROTECT APPI<20ACH
The NCDOT site is on SR 1953 and an existing stream and slough of 404 wetlands that is
a tributary to Herring Run and connects to Blounts Creek (refer to topo maps).
U plands/wetlands have been delineated and mapped inside of this slough. Upland
vegetation at the proposed mitigation site is currently a fallow farm field.
The NCDOT proposes to remove the existing vegetation and spoil from the wetland area
down to the adjacent wetland grade that will allow surface water exchange from the
existing wetlands into the excavated area.
Existing on-site plant species or "biological benchmarks" were used to identify the plant
species and target elevations.
3.0 E~IISTL~IG CONDITIONS,'ELEVATIONS
The existing site consists of two community types; Loblolly pine (Pinus taeda) dominates
the upland area. The wetland area contains loblolly, (Pinus taeda) and black willow (Salix
nigra) in the tree canopy, wax myrtle (Myrica cerifera}, eastern false willow (Baccharis
halimifolia) and highbush blueberry (Vaccinium corymbosum) as the saplings and
blackrasberry (Kobus occidentalis), giant cane (Anandinaria gigantea), saw greenbrier
(Smilax glauca) and Japanese honeysuckle (Lonicera japonica.) at the ground level.
Existing site elevations range from 14 feet in the upland areas to 7 feet in the lower areas
of the wetland areas.
Kevs Road February 2007
Final mitigation Plan Page 2 of 4

4.0 PR©POSED MITIGATION CO11~iUNITIES
A transect was used to identify plant species. The transect extended from lowest to highest
elevations within the existing wetland and upland area. Sample points were selected along
the transect to represent the lower and upper boundary of the wetland. Plant species were
invernoried. The plant species identified and elevations selected for the wetland creation
effort resulted from the use of the transect method.
5.~ Wetland Creation
Hydrology to the site will be provided by the adjacentJexisting wetland, stream, and
stormwater runoff from the surrounding uplands. Upon receiving a permit and approved
plan, In early spring ?007 target elevations will be set onsite. Silt fence will be placed
around the upland to be excavated. The plan is to remove the existing vegetation and
made the sites to a target elevation of 0.7' nearest the existing wetland. All vegetation and
anv spoil material will be removed and taken offsite to an upland stockpile area. The site
wail be accessed from Keys Road. The plan is to allow the site to revegetate naturally. If
Phragmites australis emerges in the mitigation area it will be controlled with "round-up"
herbicide.
5.2 MONITORING PROCEDURES
An asbuilt report will be submitted to the US Army Corps of Engineers once the site is
constructed. The mitigation site is owned by NCDOT. Routine road maintenance or
mowing will not disturb the sites being restored to wetland elevation. Emergent wetland
vegetation w-iIl be monitored at randomly located sample plots using GIS software. The
location of the sample plots in the field will be determined using real-time GPS. A
minimum of three 1.0 m2 sample plots will be located in the wetland areas. Vegetation at
the site will be visited twice a year and monitored for five years, or longer as necessary,
fcilowing the completion of the grade work.
5.3 SUCCESS CRITERIA
The success of the wetland creation project will be evaluated using the frequency and
average percent cover of emergent herbaceous vegetation. The site will be considered a
success if the calculated value for frequency is 0.5 and the calculated value for
average percent cover is at least 80% by the end of the fifth growing season.
Frequency will be determined by f-~;/n,,, where ~ frequency, nt number of plots where
emergent herbaceous vegetation occurs, and ny total number of plots. Average percent
cover will be determined by c=Edn, where c= average percent cover, E~ =the sum of
estimated fofiar cover for all plots, and n= the total number of plots.
Keys Road Mitigation Site February 2007
Fena! Mi~gation Plan Page 3 oj4

6.0 CONCLUSIONS
The Keys Road i~titigation Site will provide onsite wetland mitigation for impacts
generated on Keys Road SR 1953.
Table 1 summarizes wetland mitigation credits that will be generated by constructing Keys
Road Mitigation Site. Credits at the site are "restoration".
Table 1. Summary of Mitigation at Keys Road Mitigation Site
Location -Dec. Degrees : 35.3893N 76.9415W
'on T e S seise Miti ation Area Miti ation Credits
404 Wetland 404 s seise .O1 acre
Amount used 0.009 acre 0.00 acre
Balance O~OOlacre
Keys Road Mitigation Site February 2007
Final mitigation Plan Page ~of 4

! ~ S R 1953 KEYS ROAD
,:
~ ~ BEAUFORT COUNTY
~ ~_ ~ ~,.
~~~ ~
~'
=+\~f ~ 1
VV ~ ' A JaCObs Ln
I V V Sh:- .i
y~ ~ ~
°r
- ~ ~^
S `~ ~ BEGiN PROJECT
--~ ~ a ~ N 35^-23,_2 ~ „
'~,=~ ,`~~ z °%~'~~ W 76^-56,_29„
\ /
,~
i /
\~~ ~~~e`SRvo t
- ~~
F
~a
-~-~ PIPE REPLACEMENT ~` ~ v
l
~ PERMIT SITE
,~. Y=601864.2528
/ ? X=2614662.0981 ~~ ! ,
' ~.
~ \ `/"
N 35^-23'-10.26962" % ~
W 76^-50'-15.26723" ' ~ ``~
~ ~ END PROJECT
_ '~~~3 ~ ~ ti~ ~ ~ N 35^-22,_53„
-~~ i~ ~ W 76^-56'-29"
~a
N
~~
BLOUNT'S BAY USGS QUAD MAP
m
L
0 2,150 4,300 8,600 12,900 17,200
Feet

- ,: a.
~~ S R 1953 KEYS ROAD

-~' BEAUFORT COUNTY
. _

~.~ _
,~
~;
1V ~L ~~ _
~.~ L^`~~ W~
^~
U' L ( ~~

E
~ :, L
-rep t ~ t~ ~.~ {
_\
i;

~ E ~ ~ obs Ln
° M` ~ a
1i !6
t e ~ ~ ~ / ~~ ~ 1
1
-
~ _
~
`
~
~~~, i ~ ~ _~ af~
w ,;
1
1 - Qi. i z
f
~
~ ~~r~ ~1~': ~:.'
~

J
,
~.:..,.. .. ~ T
n~ , _

,
S -~ ~
; ;
~ =~IBEGIN PROJECT=
~'~
,,
~,a ,

s

_
x...
a,

r er !
'
~ ~ -o .,
x ~,
_ ., .
r ~. - ~:~
~ ~~ r- ) ±~~ ~l ~.~ i
.. -

~~ r
~ ~~

Y..
~~
_ . i
`C'
- p~ ,~i l '~~
P ~~~
- ~ f 'U
` ~
_
~
.
,
_
_
-:
~~ PIPE REPLACEMENT r ;~~'~
.
'

~-~ ~ PERMIT SITE
~ ,_ - _ ,..
~~~ '
~~
,
, -
..

Y=601864.2528 ~ -
-.
~ ~
~ _
_
~ „; .
_
. t
` }
~ . ~:,
i X=2614662.0981 ' .^
~
`{----._: --~-- --
~~ . ~ N 35^-23'-10.26962" ~ ~; ~ -_
,
,
~~
-
-

~ W 76^-56'-15.26723" -~~ _
;
~ .
`- ^~-
'~'°` - END PROJECT -
-. :~5 ,~
~.: ~ 3. ,~ ~~~ ~ tiC

-~`~~ BLOUNT'S BAY USGS QUAD MAP
y84
0 2,150 4,300 8,600 12,900 17,200
Feet

NORTH CAROIINA DEPART~iEN'r OF Z~NSPORTATION
DIVLSION OF HIGHWAYS
20
15
SR 1953
PIPE REPLACEME11tT
sF~uFORT coUN1Y
DETAII. SHEET 1

~
~

o N
~
O
v
z

ti~ ~r

=,4E.a ; _ ;S6 SOFT. / AREA ? = 34 SQ.Fr.
RAtOY a EVA SYTH RAIJDY 3 EVA SMTH
TOO TRPP ROAD T00 TIbPP RO-0
BLOtINTS CAEEx.IiC 278H BI.ODUTS CREfiK,IiC 278N R/W CHANGE
STA. 17+30
30' TO 25'
404 WETLAND BOUNDARY ~ SR 195
TOE OF SLOPE .~ ~ r .,
KEYS ROAD
~, \\ „\\

~ ? ~~ -
~
_~ _ EXISTING 30'x40' PIPE

TOE OF SLOPE ~ ~ aJa
404 WETLAND BOUNDARY ~ ~ ~ "'
AREA 4 = 130 SIFT.
R/W CHANGE
STA. 17+30
30' TO 25'
AREA 1 - 220 SQ. Fr
PROPOSED 95'x67' CAMP ^~'~ 2 ~ t90 SQ. Fr.
ao sc~. Fr. TorA~ wETtavD IAwa~r
20' 30' 30' 20• wwpr a EVA SYTH
404 WETLAND IMPACT: 410 SQ. FT. e~olli°r°s ~c.ROitc'~ zTel4 ,~ 3 ~+~scao. ~.
COASTAL WETLAND IMPACT. O SQ. FT. BUFFER ZONE 1 ItNPAGT:374 5(~. Fi_
OPEN WATER IMPACT: 40 SQ_ FT. euFFER ZONE z ItiAPACT:36 SQ. FT.
UNEAR STREAM IMPACT: 8 FT.
NOTES:
~ ro e `" ~... u+an~m .uEw
'}1115 PROIEC7 IS W THE C}1000WINfTY TV+IP. cum a ~f I1~i 11111111111111
2JTH6 PRQlECT 6 W THE TAR-PAMUCO RIVER tIASW ~'® 111111111111111111
11 Illilitlllll FIlV9i® FJJRl1 SIArE (1:1)
31TH6 PRQIKT DOES NOT FAU_YVfTHW ANY MUNICIPAL BOUNDARIES ~ 1111
~ PRDIE(.T RAN VARIES ~ Pltd'OS®
~ ROAD NAME f~l'S ROAD
r~wC
w
~ e 95'Sd7•
s,
o
61 NO I~IOVVN NCGS MONUMENTS ON PROECi ~~ °M°E r
I!
E ~rt~csoErAL
DRAWN BY: I~IECKED BY: 1D3W6 NOT TO SGU PIPEFaIODETAd.
.
ORB DRf Ms Mis

CRASS SECT~(~11~ ~~'
JANUARY 24.2007 CULVRRT CR~SSI11 t~
' 1953
KEYS RoAO SR 1953
BEAUFORT BE~UFORT COUNTY
PIPE REPLACEMENTS
EXISTING ~40' a 30" CMP
PROPOSED 95" a b7" a ~8' CMP
EXISTING 40' x 30°CMP
~ ~ i
~~ ~ o~
~„ ro ~ Esurw~ ~ ~~~30" ~~2.5~ ~ ~
iuo seoffiu~ ~~~. t \\ ~ f °i00NG rt ~.•..~
uoacvr t~ NOT TO SCALE
..ten ~
PROFOS = D 95' x 67° x 48' CMAP
/2.0'
~ ~~
' a- r
1 i~ _
-- T ,1``\~ Y, ~
I~BCUT [
BAOffILL
'NOT TG SCALE
nwL
lC MINL4fUM BECDING
PROPO cD RIP RAP D END
OF PIPS
ID'
DITCH
10'
EXCAVATION ABOVE NWL:
65'w x ~=C'L x 24'd = 26Q SUC ARE F
EXCAVATION BELOW NWL
12.0'w x S2'L x 3'd = 624 SQU~;E Fit rr
~'
W
m
N

PROPOSED RIP RAP ®END
OF PIPE
~ ~ r-- w
,,~ z z a
w w ~
° ~ ~ z
~ ~ ~ o
~ T®P VIEW ~ "'
0
o w w z
z o o r
Vl ~ (w? X
w ~ ~ W ~~
P pPE "I I Y/l,~l DIrcH
FINISHED EARTH SLOPE AS REQUIRED