20200321 Ver 1_Preliminary Wetland Delineation_20200228

WETLAND DETERMINATION,
DELINEATION, AND STREAM
IDENTIFICATION

Gastonia, NC
Fairview Drive
Gastonia, North Carolina, 28052

February 11, 2019
Partner Project No. 18-221787.3

Prepared for:
Copart
14885 Dallas Parkway Dallas, Texas 75254

8720 Red Oak Boulevard, Charlotte, North Carolina 28217 ◊ Phone [phone] ◊ Fax [phone]
February 11, 2019
Mr. Mason Laycock
Copart
14885 Dallas Parkway
Dallas, Texas 75254

Subject: Wetland Determination, Delineation, and Stream Identification
Gastonia, NC
Fairview Drive
Gastonia, North Carolina, 28052
Partner Project No. 18-221787.3

Dear Mr. Laycock:
Partner Engineering North Carolina, PLLC (Partner) is pleased to provide the results of the Wetland
Determination, Delineation, and Stream Identification report of the abovementioned address (the “subject
property”). This assessment was performed in general conformance with the scope and limitations as
detailed in our proposal dated December 12, 2018.
This assessment included a site reconnaissance, completion of applicable field data forms, mapping
features located on the subject property, as well as review of available online resources. An assessment
was made, conclusions stated, and recommendations outlined.
We appreciate the opportunity to provide environmental services to you. If you have any questions
concerning this report, or if we can assist you in any other matter, please contact me at
[e-mail].

Sincerely,
Katie L. Morgan, WPIT Gary Reynolds
Project Manager Relationship Manager

Wetland Determination, Delineation, and Stream Identification Project No. 18-221787.3 February 7, 2019 Page i
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Partner has performed a Wetland Determination, Delineation, and Stream Identification in general
conformance with the scope and limitations as detailed in our proposal for the property located at
Fairview Drive and Dallas Bessemer City Highway in the City of Gastonia, Gaston County, North Carolina
(the “subject property”). The Wetland Determination, Delineation, and Stream Identification is designed
to provide Copart with an assessment concerning wetlands and streams (limited to those issues identified
in the report) as they exist at the subject property.
Property Description
The subject property is situated between Fairview Drive and Dallas Bessemer City Highway within a
residential area of Gaston County. Please refer to the table below for further description of the subject
property:
Subject Property Data Address: Fairview Drive and Dallas Bessemer City Highway, Gastonia,
North Carolina Property Use: Undeveloped/vacant land Land Acreage (Ac): 110.24 (Total)
37.17 (Parcel 1) 43.00 (Parcel 2)
30.07 (Parcel 3) Assessor’s Parcel Number (APN): 135621 (Parcel 1)
135702 (Parcel 2) 222326 (Parcel 3) Site Assessment Performed By: Katie L. Morgan, of Partner
Site Assessment Conducted On: January 23-25, 2019
The subject property currently consists of 110.24 acres of undeveloped/vacant land. A gravel drive
provides access to the subject property from Dallas Bessemer City Highway on the west side of the
subject property. An intermittent stream flows from southwest to northeast along the northwestern and
northern property boundary. Two wetland areas were identified on the subject property. Wetland A is a
wet meadow wetland located along the intermittent stream on the west-central portion of the subject
property. Wetland B is a forested swamp located on the northern portion of the subject property south of
Long Creek.
According to available historical sources, the subject property appears to be agricultural land and
undeveloped wooded land from 1952 through 1964, and undeveloped wooded land from 1978 through
present. Historically, Long Creek has been depicted along the northern property boundary and an
unnamed tributary to Long Creek has been depicted along the western side of the subject property.
Obvious inundation is not visible in the historical aerial photographs due to dense wooded vegetation on
the subject property.
The immediately surrounding properties consist of undeveloped/vacant parcel of land to the north across
Long Creek; undeveloped/vacant parcels of land and residential (single-family homes) properties along

Wetland Determination, Delineation, and Stream Identification Project No. 18-221787.3 February 7, 2019 Page ii
with Fairview Drive to the south; undeveloped/vacant parcel of land to the east; and various residential
and commercial properties to the west across Dallas Bessemer City Highway.
Findings
According to our delineation, resource document review, and preliminary site visit observations, an
intermittent stream and approximately 20.47-acres of wetlands are located on the subject property.
Conclusions, Opinions and Recommendations
This assessment has revealed evidence of wetlands located on the subject property.
In the event the United States Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) considers the observed features to be
jurisdictional, proposed impacts to the features could require a Section 404 Permit. It is the opinion of
Partner that the wetland areas on the subject property, are connected to Long Creek and the Catawba
River Basin and would be considered jurisdictional and regulated by the USACE as well as by local / state
agencies. If proposed development onsite will impact the observed features regulatory concurrence
should be obtained.
It should be noted the USACE has the ultimate authority for wetland and Waters of the United States
(WoUS) determinations. The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has the ultimate authority for official
jurisdictional determinations; however, authority has been delegated to the USACE to give an approved
jurisdictional determination (AJD) on potential Waters of the United States.
In addition, this assessment has revealed evidence of an intermittent stream on the subject property. In
the event Gaston County or the City of Gastonia considers the observed features to be jurisdictional,
proposed impacts to the features could require a Section 401 Permit and a 10-foot buffer around the
identified features. It is the opinion of Partner that the intermittent stream and Long Creek on the subject
property would be considered jurisdictional and regulated by Gaston County or the City of Gastonia. If
proposed development onsite will impact the 10-foot buffer around observed features regulatory
concurrence should be obtained.

Wetland Determination, Delineation, and Stream Identification Project No. 18-221787.3 February 7, 2019 Page iii
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1.0 INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................................................... 1
1.1 Purpose ................................................................................................................................................................................ 1
1.2 Scope of Work ................................................................................................................................................................... 1 1.3 Limitations .......................................................................................................................................................................... 1 1.5 Limiting Conditions ......................................................................................................................................................... 2
2.0 SITE DESCRIPTION ............................................................................................................................... 3
2.1 Site Location and Legal Description ......................................................................................................................... 3
2.2 Current Property Use ...................................................................................................................................................... 3 2.3 Physical Setting Sources ................................................................................................................................................ 3
2.3.1 Topography .............................................................................................................................................................. 3 2.3.2 Hydrology ................................................................................................................................................................. 3 2.3.3 Geology/Soils .......................................................................................................................................................... 3
2.3.4 Flood Zone Information ...................................................................................................................................... 4 2.3.5 National Wetlands Inventory ............................................................................................................................ 4
3.0 HISTORICAL INFORMATION............................................................................................................... 5
4.0 SITE RECONNAISSANCE ...................................................................................................................... 6
4.1 Wetland Observations .................................................................................................................................................... 6 4.1.1 Plant Community Assessment .......................................................................................................................... 6
4.1.2 Hydric Soils Assessment ...................................................................................................................................... 8 4.1.3 Wetland Hydrology Assessment ................................................................................................................... 10
4.1.4 Delineation of Wetlands................................................................................................................................... 10 4.1 Stream Observations ................................................................................................................................................... 11 4.2.1 Geomorphology Indicators ............................................................................................................................. 11
4.2.2 Hydrology Indicators ......................................................................................................................................... 11 4.2.3 Biology Indicators ............................................................................................................................................... 11
4.1.5 Delineation of Streams ..................................................................................................................................... 12
5.0 FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS........................................................................................................ 13
8.0 SIGNATURES OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROFESSIONALS ................................................................. 14
9.0 REFERENCES ........................................................................................................................................ 15

Figures
Figure 1 Site Location Map
Figure 2 Site Plan
Figure 3 Topographic Map

Appendices
Appendix A Site Photographs
Appendix B Supporting Information

Wetland Determination, Delineation, and Stream Identification Project No. 18-221787.3 February 7, 2019 Page 1
1.0 INTRODUCTION
Partner has performed a Wetland Determination, Delineation, and Stream Identification in general
conformance with the scope and limitations as detailed in our proposal for the property located at
Fairview Drive and Dallas Bessemer City Highway in the City of Gastonia, Gaston County, North Carolina
(the “subject property”). The Wetland Determination, Delineation, and Stream Identification is designed
to provide Copart with an assessment concerning wetlands and streams (limited to those issues identified
in the report) as they exist at the subject property.
1.1 Purpose
The purpose of performing the Wetland Determination, Delineation, and Stream Identification is to
identify and characterize the existing site conditions, observe the subject property for the presence of
wetlands and intermittent or perennial streams.
1.2 Scope of Work
The scope of work for this Wetland Determination, Delineation, and Stream Identification was performed
in general conformance with the scope and limitations as detailed in our proposal. This assessment
included: 1) a review of topographical maps, the National Wetlands Inventory map, and aerial photograph
resources to assist with identifying suspect streams and wetland areas on the subject property; 2) a
property site reconnaissance including wetland and stream data point sampling, and flagging wetland and
stream boundaries; 3) preparation of a map depicting approximate locations of wetlands and streams
observed on the subject property; 4) completion of this report that includes site characterization
information, a discussion of applicable data, and recommendations for the subject property.
1.3 Limitations
Partner warrants that the findings and conclusions contained herein were accomplished in accordance
with the methodologies set forth in the Scope of Work. These methodologies are described as
representing good commercial and customary practice for conducting a Wetland Determination,
Delineation, and Stream Identification of a property for the purpose of identifying wetlands and streams
on the subject property. There is a possibility that even with the proper application of these
methodologies there may exist on the subject property conditions that could not be identified within the
scope of the assessment or which were not reasonably identifiable from the available information. Partner
believes that the information obtained concerning the subject property is reliable. However, Partner
cannot and does not warrant or guarantee that the information provided by these other sources is
accurate or complete. The conclusions and findings set forth in this report are strictly limited in time and
scope to the date of the evaluations. The conclusions presented in the report are based solely on the
services described therein, and not on scientific tasks or procedures beyond the scope of agreed-upon
services or the time and budgeting restraints imposed by the Client. No other warranties are implied or
expressed.

Wetland Determination, Delineation, and Stream Identification Project No. 18-221787.3 February 7, 2019 Page 2
Some of the information provided in this report is based upon research of available documents, records,
and maps held by the appropriate government and private agencies. This report is subject to the
limitations of historical documentation, availability, and accuracy of pertinent records.
1.5 Limiting Conditions
The findings and conclusions contain all of the limitations inherent in these methodologies that are
referred to the 1987 USACE Manual Regional Supplement to the Corps of Engineers Wetland Delineation
Manual: Eastern Mountain and Piedmont Region Version 2.0 (U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, April 2012);
and the Identification Methods for the Origins of Intermittent and Perennial Streams Version 3.1 (North
Carolina Division of Water Quality, February 28, 2005).
Specific limitations and exceptions to this Wetland Determination, Delineation, and Stream Identification
are more specifically set forth below:
• The site reconnaissance was conducted outside of the growing season and dieback of herbaceous
plants and loss of deciduous leaf cover, typical of winter months, was encountered in the field.
The available datum required to accurately identify trees, shrubs, and certain herbaceous
vegetation to species was limited and significantly reduced compared to warmer months. Based
on available vegetation and leaf litter, at the time of the site reconnaissance, this limitation is not
expected to alter the overall findings of this assessment.
• The North Carolina Stream Identification Form for Stream Identification Sample Point 1 was
completed approximately 4 hours after a rain event that produced 0.24-inches of precipitation in
the vicinity of the subject property. The North Carolina Stream Identification Form for Stream
Identification Sample Point 2 was completed within 24 hours of the 0.24-inch rain event, and an
additional 0.58-inch rain event which ended approximately 1 hour prior to sample collection. Due
to the rain events “Presence of Baseflow” was not rated at the Stream Identification Sample
Points. Omitting “Presence of Baseflow” evaluation did not alter the rating of the stream. Based
on intermittent stream rating at each sample point with or without evaluating “Presence of
Baseflow”, this limitation is not expected to alter the overall findings of this assessment.
Due to time constraints associated with this report, the Client has requested the report despite the above-
listed limitations.

Wetland Determination, Delineation, and Stream Identification Project No. 18-221787.3 February 7, 2019 Page 3
2.0 SITE DESCRIPTION
2.1 Site Location and Legal Description
The subject property is situated between Fairview Drive and Dallas Bessemer City Highway in Gastonia,
North Carolina, is located on the north side of Fairview Drive and the west side of Dallas Bessemer City
Highway. According to the Gaston County Assessor, the subject property ownership is currently vested in
GASTONIA INDUSTRIAL REALTY CO since 1988 and is comprised of three parcels totaling 110.24 acres.
Please refer to Figure 1: Site Location Map, Figure 2: Site Plan, Figure 3: Topographic Map, and Appendix
A: Site Photographs for the location and site characteristics of the subject property.
2.2 Current Property Use
The subject property is currently vacant wooded land.
The subject property is designated for I-2 Industrial development by the City of Gastonia.
2.3 Physical Setting Sources
2.3.1 Topography
The United States Geological Survey (USGS), Gastonia North, North Carolina Quadrangle 7.5-minute series
topographic map was reviewed for this report. According to the contour lines on the topographic map,
the subject property is located at approximately 785 feet above mean sea level (MSL). The subject
property is depicted on the 2014 map with vegetation and Long Creek along the northern property
boundary and an unnamed tributary to Long Creek along the western side of the subject property
A copy of the most recent topographic map is included as Figure 3 of this report.
2.3.2 Hydrology
According to topographic map interpretation, the direction of groundwater in the vicinity of the subject
property is inferred to flow toward the northeast. Historically, Long Creek has been depicted along the
northern property boundary and an unnamed tributary to Long Creek has been depicted along the
western side of the subject property. Obvious inundation is not visible in the historical aerial photographs
due to dense wooded vegetation on the subject property.
2.3.3 Geology/Soils
The subject property is situated within the Southern Outer Piedmont of the Piedmont ecoregion in North
Carolina. The Southern Outer Piedmont ecoregion has lower elevations, less relief, and less precipitation
than the Southern Inner Piedmont ecoregion. The landform class is mostly irregular plains. Pine (mostly
loblolly and shortleaf) dominates on old field sites and pine plantations, while mixed oak forest is found in
less heavily altered areas. Gneiss, schist, and granite are typical rock types, covered with deep saprolite
and mostly red, clayey subsoils. Kanhapludults are common soils, such as the Cecil, Appling, and Madison
series. Some areas within this region have more alkaline soils, such as the Iredell series, formed over
diabase, diorite, or gabbro, and may be associated with areas once known as blackjack oak prairies.

Wetland Determination, Delineation, and Stream Identification Project No. 18-221787.3 February 7, 2019 Page 4
The subject property is situated within the Kings Mountain Belt of the Piedmont physiographic province of
the State of North Carolina. The subject property is underlain by the Foliated to Massive Granitic Rock
Formation. These rock formations, consist largely of megacrystic to equigranular high shoals granite.
Based on information obtained from the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) Natural
Resources Conservation Service Web Soil Survey online database, the subject property is mapped as Cecil
sandy clay loam, 2 to 15 percent slopes, moderately eroded; Chewacla loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes,
frequently flooded; Madison sandy clay loam, 2 to 15 percent slopes, moderately eroded; Madison sandy
loam, 15 to 25 percent slopes; Pacolet sandy loam, 15 to 25 percent slopes; and Vance sandy loam, 2 to 8
percent slopes.
The Chewacla loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes, frequently flooded soils are listed as hydric soils in the NRCS
hydric soil list for Gaston County Area, North Carolina and are considered hydric.
2.3.4 Flood Zone Information
Partner performed a review of the Flood Insurance Rate Map, published by the Federal Emergency
Management Agency. According to Community Panel Number 3710353700J, dated September 28, 2007,
the south and southwest portions of the subject property appear to be located in Zone X, an area of
minimal flood hazard. The norther portions of the subject property appear to be located in Zone AE,
special flood hazard areas and in the regulatory floodway.
FEMA maps typically do not reflect potential local drainage problems or the ability of the local storm
water management system to convey the surface water runoff created by storms or other occurrences,
and Partner expresses no opinion in this regard.
A copy of the reviewed flood map is included in Appendix B of this report.
2.3.5 National Wetlands Inventory
The National Wetlands Inventory (NWI) Map of the subject property was reviewed to identify suspect
wetland areas. The map was published by the U.S. Department of the Interior’s Fish and Wildlife Service
(USFWS) and depicts suspect wetland areas and waterbodies based on stereoscopic analysis of high
altitude aerial photographs.
Review of the online United States Fish and Wildlife (USFW) National Wetlands Inventory (NWI) map,
depicted current and/or historic wetland areas on the subject property. A portion of a 27.66-acre
Palustrine Forested Broad-Leaved Deciduous Temporary Flooded (PFO1A) wetland habitat is depicted on
the north side of the subject property. A portion of a 1.77-acre Riverine Intermittent Streambed Seasonally
Flooded (R4SBC) wetland habitat is depicted along the western side of the subject property. A portion of a
Riverine Lower Perennial Unconsolidated Bottom Permanently Flooded (R2UBH) wetland habitat,
identified as Long Creek, is located along the northern property boundary of the subject property.
A copy of the reviewed NWI map is included in Appendix B of this report.

Wetland Determination, Delineation, and Stream Identification Project No. 18-221787.3 February 7, 2019 Page 5
3.0 HISTORICAL INFORMATION
Partner obtained historical use information about the subject property from a variety of sources. A
chronological listing of the historical data found is summarized in the table below:
Historical Use Information Period/Date Source Description/Use
1952-1964 Aerial Photographs, Interviews, Topographic Maps Agricultural land and undeveloped wooded land; Long Creek to the north and an
unnamed tributary to Long Creek of the west side of the property
1978-Present Aerial Photographs, Building Records, City Directories, Interviews, Onsite Observations, Sanborn Maps
Undeveloped/vacant land; Long Creek to the north and an unnamed tributary to Long Creek
of the west side of the property
Historically, the subject property appears to be agricultural land and undeveloped wooded land from
1952 through 1964, and undeveloped wooded land from 1978 through present. Historically, Long Creek
has been depicted along the northern property boundary and an unnamed tributary to Long Creek has
been depicted along the western side of the subject property. Obvious inundation is not visible in the
historical aerial photographs due to dense wooded vegetation on the subject property.

Wetland Determination, Delineation, and Stream Identification Project No. 18-221787.3 February 7, 2019 Page 6
4.0 SITE RECONNAISSANCE
Partner conducted a reconnaissance of the subject property on January 23-25, 2019 to characterize the
existing site conditions and identify the presence of wetlands and streams on the subject property, if any.
Characteristics of potential jurisdictional wetlands and streams were assessed (when applicable) utilizing
the criteria detailed below. The evaluation methods generally followed the routine on-site determination
method referenced in the 1987 USACE Manual Regional Supplement to the Corps of Engineers Wetland
Delineation Manual: Eastern Mountain and Piedmont Region Version 2.0 (U.S. Army Corps of Engineers,
April 2012); and the Identification Methods for the Origins of Intermittent and Perennial Streams Version
3.1 (North Carolina Division of Water Quality, February 28, 2005).
4.1 Wetland Observations
Wetlands generally have three essential characteristics: hydrophytic (wetland) vegetation, hydric soils, and
wetland hydrology. Suspect wetland areas were identified on the subject property prior to the site
reconnaissance. Vegetation, soils, and hydrology observations were performed throughout the site where
access was permitted and were evaluated to determine if wetland characteristics were present. Data
regarding the three essential characteristics was gathered within observed suspect wetland areas, if any,
to further delineate boundaries. Partner personnel traversed the project site on foot while performing
wetland observations.
4.1.1 Plant Community Assessment
Suspect areas were visually observed to determine the species, when possible, and absolute percentage of
ground cover for five strata of plant community types. Herbs were generally observed within a five-foot
radius, shrubs/saplings within a fifteen-foot radius, and trees and vines within a thirty-foot radius of the
observation location.
For each species of vegetation observed, their wetland indicator status was evaluated. The indicator
status was determined using the USACE National Wetlands Plant List (NWPL). Per guidance from the
USACE, as of April 28, 2016, the 2016 NWPL should be used for wetland determinations and delineations
(the NWPL can be found at http://rsgisias.crrel.usace.army.mil/NWPL/).
According to the US Army Corps of Engineers, July 2012, National Wetland Plant List Indicator Rating
Definition document, wetland indicator status ratings and their rating categories, as described in the
National List of Plant Species that Occur in Wetlands (Reed 1988) are provided in the table below.

Wetland Determination, Delineation, and Stream Identification Project No. 18-221787.3 February 7, 2019 Page 7

Indicator status (abbreviation) % Occurrence
in wetlands
Obligate (OBL). Occur almost always under natural conditions in wetlands. 99
Facultative Wetland (FACW). Usually occur in wetlands but occasionally found in non-wetlands. 67–99
Facultative (FAC). Equally likely to occur in wetlands and non-wetlands. 34–66
Facultative Upland (FACU). Usually occur in non-wetlands but occasionally found
in wetlands.
1–33
Upland (UPL). Occur in wetlands in another region, but occur almost always under
natural conditions in non-wetlands in the region specified.
1
* For Species listed as NI (no regional indicator) or NO (no known occurrence in the region at the time the list was
compiled), the indicator status assigned to the species in the nearest adjacent region was applied. If the species is listed
as NI or NO but no adjacent regional indicator is assigned the species is not used to calculate hydrophytic vegetation
indicators.
The percent cover of each stratum was determined and dominance was evaluated. Dominant species
were the most abundant species that accounted for more than 20 percent of the absolute percent
coverage of the stratum. The number of dominant species with an indicator status of OBL, FACW, and/or
FAC was compared to the total number of dominant species across all strata. If all dominant species
across all strata are rated OBL and/or FACW, hydrophytic vegetation was present. If all dominant species
across all strata are not rated OBL and/or FACW then the dominance test is applied; and typically, when
more than 50 percent of the dominant species had an indicator status of OBL, FACW, and/or FAC,
hydrophytic vegetation was present. If the percentage of dominant species with an indicator status of
OBL, FACW, and/or FAC was less than 50 percent, prevalence index and morphological adaptations may
have been evaluated to confirm if hydrophytic vegetation was present or absent.
The site reconnaissance was conducted outside of the growing season and dieback of herbaceous plants
and loss of deciduous leaf cover, typical of winter months, was encountered in the field. The available
datum required to accurately identify trees, shrubs, and certain herbaceous vegetation to species was
limited and significantly reduced compared to warmer months.
At the time of the site reconnaissance, the following vegetation species were observed in the wetland area
at Sample Point 2: Acer rubrum (FAC); Fagus grandifolia (FACU); Quercus coccinea* (NI); and Ligustrum
sinense (FACU). Based on the NWPL vegetation indicator status of the dominant species, the wetland area
associated with Sample Point 1 is not dominated by hydrophytic vegetation.

Wetland Determination, Delineation, and Stream Identification Project No. 18-221787.3 February 7, 2019 Page 8
At the time of the site reconnaissance, the following vegetation species were observed in the wetland area
at Sample Point 2: Platanus occidentalis (FACW); Fagus grandifolia (FACW); Andropogon geradii (FAC);
Hydrocotyle Americana (OBL); and Pulicaria paludosa (UPL). Pulicaria paludosa was observed to be
primarily rooted in adjacent upland areas, and is an established invasive species prolific in the area. Based
on the NWPL vegetation indicator status of the dominant species, the dominance test for the vegetation
was met, and the wetland area associated with Sample Point 2 is dominated by hydrophytic vegetation.
At the time of the site reconnaissance, the following vegetation species were observed in the wetland area
at Sample Point 3: Celtis laevigata willd (FACW); Liquidambar styraciflua (FAC); Platanus occidentalis
(FACW); Arundinaria gigantea (FACW); Ligustrum sinense (FACU); and Pulicaria paludosa (UPL). Pulicaria
paludosa was observed to be primarily rooted in adjacent upland areas, and is an established invasive
species prolific in the area. Ligustrum sinense was observed to be stunted in comparison to other areas it
dominated on the subject property. Ligustrum sinense is an established invasive species prolific in the
area. Based on the NWPL vegetation indicator status of the dominant species, the dominance test for the
vegetation was met, and the wetland area associated with Sample Point 3 is dominated by hydrophytic
vegetation.
At the time of the site reconnaissance, the following vegetation species were observed in the wetland area
at Sample Point 4: Acer rubrum (FAC); Liquidambar styraciflua (FAC); Platanus occidentalis (FACW); Betula
nigra L. (FACW); Quercus marilandica* (NI); Ligustrum sinense (FACU); Smilax laurifolia (OBL); and Smilax
rotundifolia (FAC). Ligustrum sinense was observed to be stunted in comparison to other areas it
dominated on the subject property. Ligustrum sinense is an established invasive species prolific in the
area. Based on the NWPL vegetation indicator status of the dominant species, the dominance test for the
vegetation was met, and the wetland area associated with Sample Point 4 is dominated by hydrophytic
vegetation.
At the time of the site reconnaissance, the following vegetation species were observed in the wetland area
at Sample Point 5: Arundinaria gigantea (FACW); Smilax laurifolia (OBL); Acer rubrum (FAC); Pulicaria
paludosa (UPL); Liquidambar styraciflua (FAC); Quercus marilandica* (NI); Ligustrum sinense (FACU); and
Quercus coccinea* (NI). Based on the NWPL vegetation indicator status of the dominant species, the
wetland area associated with Sample Point 1 is not dominated by hydrophytic vegetation. Based on the
NWPL vegetation indicator status of the dominant species, the dominance test for the vegetation was
met, and the wetland area associated with Sample Point 5 is dominated by hydrophytic vegetation.
4.1.2 Hydric Soils Assessment
A hydric soil is a soil that forms under conditions of saturation, flooding, or ponding long enough during
the growing season to develop anaerobic conditions in the upper part. Hydric soil field indicators and a
hydric soil technical standard have been developed to determine whether a soil meets the criteria for
hydric soils. The soil samples were visually compared to Munsell Soil Color Charts (Munsell, 2009); and
examined for hydric soil indicators.
The soil sample collected at Sample Point 1 wetland area exists within the Chewacla loam, 0 to 2 percent
slopes, frequently flooded soil map unit; which is listed as a hydric soil in the NRCS hydric soil list for

Wetland Determination, Delineation, and Stream Identification Project No. 18-221787.3 February 7, 2019 Page 9
Gaston County, North Carolina. A subsurface soil samples was collected to a depth of approximately 18
inches below the ground surface (bgs) at Sample Point 1. The soil profile from 0 to 2 inches bgs has a hue
of 7.5YR with a value of 3 and chroma of 1 (color of 7.5YR 3/1); with 5% prominent redox concentrations
in the matrix that have a color of 7.5YR 5/8. The soil profile from 2 to 8 inches bgs has a matrix color of
5YR 5/8; with 10% distinct redox depletions in the matrix that have a color of 7.5YR 4/2. The soil profile
from 8 to 18 inches bgs has a matrix color of 7.5YR 5/8; with 25% prominent reduced matrix with a color
of Gley1 5/10Y. The soil texture from 0 to 18 inches bgs is silty clay. The evaluation of the soil revealed the
presence of the field hydric soil indicator Redox Depressions – F8.
The soil sample collected at Sample Point 2 wetland area exists within the Chewacla loam, 0 to 2 percent
slopes, frequently flooded soil map unit; which is listed as a hydric soil in the NRCS hydric soil list for
Gaston County, North Carolina. A subsurface soil samples was collected to a depth of approximately 18
inches below the ground surface (bgs) at Sample Point 2. The soil profile from 0 to 18 inches bgs has a
color of 7.5YR 4/4; with 5% distinct redox concentration in the matrix that have a color of 5YR 5/6. The soil
texture is silty clay. The evaluation of the soil revealed the presence of the field hydric soil indicator Redox
Depressions – F8.
The soil sample collected at Sample Point 3 wetland area exists within the Chewacla loam, 0 to 2 percent
slopes, frequently flooded soil map unit; which is listed as a hydric soil in the NRCS hydric soil list for
Gaston County, North Carolina. A subsurface soil samples was collected to a depth of approximately 20
inches below the ground surface (bgs) at Sample Point 2. The soil profile from 0 to 2 inches bgs has a
color of 10YR 3/1; with a texture of loamy sand. The soil profile from 2 to 20 inches bgs has a matrix color
of 10YR 4/4; with 10% distinct redox concentrations in the matrix with a color of 10YR 7/4. The soil profile
from 2 to 20 inches bgs has a texture of sand with clay. The evaluation of the soil revealed the presence of
the field hydric soil indicator Redox Depressions – F8.
The soil sample collected at Sample Point 4 wetland area exists within the Chewacla loam, 0 to 2 percent
slopes, frequently flooded soil map unit; which is listed as a hydric soil in the NRCS hydric soil list for
Gaston County, North Carolina. A subsurface soil samples was collected to a depth of approximately 18
inches below the ground surface (bgs) at Sample Point 4. The soil profile from 0 to 2 inches bgs has a
texture of loamy clay with a matrix color of 10YR 4/2; with 2% prominent redox concentrations along pore
linings that have a color of 5YR 4/6. The soil profile from 2 to 4 inches bgs has a texture of loamy clay with
a matrix color of 10YR 4/3; with 7% prominent redox concentrations along pore linings that have a color
of 2.5YR 3/6. The soil profile from 4 to 12 inches bgs has a texture of clayey sand with a matrix color of
7.5YR 5/8, with a reduced matrix color of Gley1 6/10Y, and 1% prominent redox concentrations along
pore linings that have a color of 2.5YR 4/6. The soil profile from 12 to 18 inches bgs has a texture of clay
with sand; and a matrix color of 7.5YR 5/8, with a 60% reduced matrix color of Gley1 6/10Y, and 1%
prominent redox concentrations along pore linings that have a color of 2.5YR 4/6. The evaluation of the
soil revealed the presence of the field hydric soil indicator Loamy Gleyed Matrix – F2.
The soil sample collected at Sample Point 5 wetland area exists within the Chewacla loam, 0 to 2 percent
slopes, frequently flooded soil map unit; which is listed as a hydric soil in the NRCS hydric soil list for
Gaston County, North Carolina. A subsurface soil samples was collected to a depth of approximately 18

Wetland Determination, Delineation, and Stream Identification Project No. 18-221787.3 February 7, 2019 Page 10
inches below the ground surface (bgs) at Sample Point 5. The soil profile from 0 to 1-inch bgs has a
texture of sandy loam with a matrix color of 2.5Y 3/1. The soil profile from 1 to 3 inches bgs has a texture
of sandy clay loam with a matrix color of 10YR 4/2. The soil profile from 3 to 5 inches bgs has a texture of
sandy clay loam with a matrix color of 7.5YR 5/6. The soil profile from 3 to 5 inches bgs has a texture of
sandy clay loam with a matrix color of 7.5YR 3/4. The evaluation of the soil did not reveale the presence of
field hydric soil indicators.
4.1.3 Wetland Hydrology Assessment
Visual indicators of wetland hydrology were evaluated. Examples of primary wetland hydrology indicators
include, but are not limited to, surface water, high water table, soil saturation, water marks, sediment
deposits, drift deposits, iron deposits, inundation visible on aerial imagery, and water-stained leaves.
Examples of secondary wetland hydrology indicators include, but are not limited to, surface soil cracks,
drainage patterns, moss trim lines, and crayfish burrows. If at least one primary wetland hydrology
indicator or two secondary wetland hydrology indicators were observed, the observation location was
considered to have wetland hydrology.
The following wetland hydrology indicators were observed at Sample Point 1: Surface Water (A1);
Saturation (A3); Water Marks (B1); Sediment Deposits (B2); Drift Deposits (B3); Water-Stained Leaves (B9);
and Drainage Patterns (B10).
The following wetland hydrology indicators were observed at Sample Point 2: Geomorphic Position (D2)
and Drainage Patterns (B10).
The following wetland hydrology indicators were observed at Sample Point 3: Drift Deposits (B3); Water-
Stained Leaves (B9); Drainage Patterns (B10); Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1); and Geomorphic Position
(D2).
The following wetland hydrology indicators were observed at Sample Point 4: Surface Water (A1); High
Water Table (A2); Saturation (A3); Drift Deposits (B3); Water-Stained Leaves (B9); Oxidized Rhizospheres
on Living Roots (C3); Presence of Reduced Iron (C4); Drainage Patterns (B10); Stunted or Stressed Plants
(D1); and Geomorphic Position (D2).
The following wetland hydrology indicators were observed at Sample Point 5: Geomorphic Position (D2).
Geomorphic Position is a secondary indicator. Two or more secondary indicators are required for wetland
hydrology to be present. As such, wetland hydrology was not present at Sample Point 5.
Wetland hydrology was observed at Sample Points 1 through 4.
4.1.4 Delineation of Wetlands
Upon completion and review of the three wetland criteria at each area, a wetland determination was
made. Under normal circumstances, if one or more of the wetland criteria were not identified, the area
was not considered to be a wetland. Additional observations were made throughout the wetland area to
define the wetland/non-wetland boundary, which was flagged in the field for mapping by a licensed
surveyor. Vegetation, soil, and hydrology assessment data from at least one location within identified
wetland areas and one upland location outside of the identified wetland areas were recorded on a USACE

Wetland Determination, Delineation, and Stream Identification Project No. 18-221787.3 February 7, 2019 Page 11
Wetland Determination Data Forms. The recorded data forms for the subject property can be found in
Appendix B. The data sample point locations, and delineated wetland areas can be seen on Figure 2.
4.1 Stream Observations
NC Department of Water Quality (DWQ) Methodology for Identification of Intermittent and Perennial
Streams and Their Origins Manual and the Stream Identification Form Version 4.11, were used for the
identification of ephemeral, intermittent and perennial streams using geomorphic, hydrologic and
biological stream features. Each indicator outlined in the Stream Identification Form was rated on a scale
of absent, weak, moderate, and strong and points for each indicator rating were given. The stream was
assessed at three locations on the subject property; one at each branch of the stream (two locations); and
one downstream of the joining of the two branches. Each stream assessment location indicated the
stream is a perennial stream.
4.2.1 Geomorphology Indicators
Geomorphology indicators were evaluated for the streams located on the subject property, which
included: continuity of channel bed and bank, sinuosity of channel along thalweg, in-channel structure:
riffle-pool, step-pool, ripple-pool sequence, particle size in stream substrate, active/relict floodplain,
depositional bars or benches, recent alluvial deposits, head cuts, grade control, natural valley, and second
(or greater) order channel. Each geomorphology indicator is given a score based on strength of presence
of the indicator. For individual geomorphology indicator scores please reference the NC DWQ Stream
Identification Forms Version 2.11 in Appendix B.
Geomorphology scored 14.5 point at Stream Identification Sample Point 1; and 16.5 at Stream
Identification Sample Point 2.
4.2.2 Hydrology Indicators
Hydrology indicators were evaluated for the streams located on the subject property, which included:
presence of baseflow, iron oxidizing bacteria, leaf litter, sediment on plants or debris, organic debris lines
or piles, and soil-based evidence of highwater table. Each hydrology indicator is given a score based on
strength of presence of the indicator. For individual hydrology indicator scores please reference the NC
DWQ Stream Identification Forms Version 2.11 in Appendix B.
Due to rain events within 48-hours of completing the Stream Identification Form Version 4.11, the
presence of baseflow was not evaluated.
Hydrology scored 7.5 point at Stream Identification Sample Point 1; and 6.5 at Stream Identification
Sample Point 2.
4.2.3 Biology Indicators
Biology indicators were evaluated for the streams located on the subject property, which included: fibrous
roots in streambed, rooted upland plants in streambed, macrobenthos, aquatic mollusks, fish, crayfish,
amphibians, algae, and wetland plants in streambed. Each biology indicator is given a score based on

Wetland Determination, Delineation, and Stream Identification Project No. 18-221787.3 February 7, 2019 Page 12
strength of presence of the indicator. For individual biology indicator scores please reference the NC
DWQ Stream Identification Forms Version 2.11 in Appendix B.
Biology scored 6.5 point at Stream Identification Sample Point 1; and 6 at Stream Identification Sample
Point 2.
4.1.5 Delineation of Streams
Upon completion and review of the criteria Identification Methods for the Origins of Intermittent and
Perennial Streams Version 3.1 at each stream reach, a stream determination was made. Under normal
circumstances, if the total points across the stream indicators was equal to or greater than 19 the stream
is identified as an intermittent stream; and if total points were equal to or greater than 30 the stream is
identified as a perennial stream. Additional observations were made throughout the stream reach to
define the ordinary highwater mark, which was flagged in the field for mapping by a licensed surveyor.
Geomorphology, Hydrology, and Biology indicators are rated and recorded on the NC DWQ Stream
Identification Forms Version 2.11 in Appendix B. The sample point locations, and ordinary highwater mark
of the intermittent stream identified on the subject property can be seen on Figure 2.

Wetland Determination, Delineation, and Stream Identification Project No. 18-221787.3 February 7, 2019 Page 13
5.0 FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS
Findings
According to our delineation, resource document review, and preliminary site visit observations, an
intermittent stream and approximately 20.47-acres of wetlands are located on the subject property.
Conclusions, Opinions and Recommendations
This assessment has revealed evidence of wetlands located on the subject property.
In the event the United States Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) considers the observed features to be
jurisdictional, proposed impacts to the features could require a Section 404 Permit. It is the opinion of
Partner that the wetland areas on the subject property, are connected to Long Creek and the Catawba
River Basin and would be considered jurisdictional and regulated by the USACE as well as by local / state
agencies. If proposed development onsite will impact the observed features regulatory concurrence
should be obtained.
It should be noted the USACE has the ultimate authority for wetland and Waters of the United States
(WoUS) determinations. The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has the ultimate authority for official
jurisdictional determinations; however, authority has been delegated to the USACE to give an approved
jurisdictional determination (AJD) on potential Waters of the United States.
In addition, this assessment has revealed evidence of an intermittent stream on the subject property. In
the event Gaston County or the City of Gastonia considers the observed features to be jurisdictional,
proposed impacts to the features could require a Section 401 Permit and a 10-foot buffer around the
identified features. It is the opinion of Partner that the intermittent stream and Long Creek on the subject
property would be considered jurisdictional and regulated by Gaston County or the City of Gastonia. If
proposed development onsite will impact the 10-foot buffer around observed features regulatory
concurrence should be obtained.

Wetland Determination, Delineation, and Stream Identification Project No. 18-221787.3 February 7, 2019 Page 14
8.0 SIGNATURES OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROFESSIONALS
Partner has performed a Wetland Determination, Delineation, and Stream Identification of the property
located at Fairview Drive and Dallas Bessemer City Highway in the City of Gastonia, Gaston County, North
Carolina in general conformance with the scope and limitations of the protocol and the limitations stated
earlier in this report. Exceptions to or deletions from this protocol are discussed earlier in this report.
By signing this report, we declare that, to the best of our professional knowledge and belief, we have the
specific qualifications based on education, training, and experience to assess a property of the nature,
history, and setting of the subject property.
Prepared By:
Katie L. Morgan, WPIT
Project Manager

Reviewed By:
Angelique Crews
Senior Author

Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Project No. 18-221787.3 February 7, 2019 Page 15
9.0 REFERENCES
Reference Documents
Lichvar, R.W., D.L. Banks, W.N. Kirchner, and N.C. Melvin. 2016. The National Wetland Plant List: 2016
wetland ratings. Phytoneuron 2016-30: 1-17. Published 28 April 2016. ISSN 2153 733X
http://www.phytoneuron.net/
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers 2018. National Wetland Plant List, version 3.3
http://wetland_plants.usace.army.mil/
Environmental Data Resources (EDR), Radius Report, February 7, 2019
Federal Emergency Management Agency, Federal Insurance Administration, National Flood Insurance
Program, Flood Insurance Map, accessed via internet, February 7, 2019
United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service, accessed via internet,
February 7, 2019
United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service, Web Soil Survey,
accessed via the internet, February 7, 2019
United States Geological Survey, accessed via the Internet, February 7, 2019
United States Geological Survey Topographic Map 2013, 7.5-minute series, accessed via internet, February
7, 2019

FIGURES
1 SITE LOCATION MAP
2 SITE PLAN
3 TOPOGRAPHIC MAP
FIGURE 1: SITE LOCATION MAP
Project No. 18-221787.3

Drawing Not To Scale
KEY:
Subject Property

FIGURE 2: SITE PLAN
Project No. 18-221787.3

KEY:
Subject Property

FIGURE 3: TOPOGRAPHIC MAP
Project No. 18-221787.3

USGS 7.5 Minute Gaston North, North Carolina Quadrangle Created: 2013
KEY:
Subject Property

APPENDIX A: SITE PHOTOGRAPHS
1. Steam Identification Sample Point 1 view down-stream
3. Soil based evidence of high water table at Steam Identification Sample Point 1
5. Organic debris piles or lines at Stream Identifi-cation Sample Point 1
2. Steam Identification Sample Point 1
4. Soil based evidence of high water table at Steam Identification Sample Point 1
6. Channel structure at Stream Identification Sample Point 1
Appendix A: Site Photographs
Project No. 18-221787.3
7. Sinuosity at Stream Identification Sample Point 1
9. Organic drift lines near Identification Sample Point 2
11. View of natural valley and channel structure at Identification Sample Point 2
8. View down stream of Stream Identification Sample Point 2 sinuosity and baseflow
10. View of natural valley at Identification Sample Point 2
12. Soil based evidence of highwater table at Stream Sample Point 2
Project No. 18-221787.3
Appendix A: Site Photographs
13. Soil based evidence of highwater table at Stream Sample Point 2
15. Grade control along the stream reach
17. Depositional bars/benches along the stream reach
14. Leaf litter and organic drift lines common throughout the stream reach
16. Head cut along the upper stream reach
18. Wetland Sample Point 1
Project No. 18-221787.3
Appendix A: Site Photographs
19. Wetland Sample Point 1 view west
21. Wetland Sample Point 1 view south
23. Wetland Sample Point 1—water marks on trees
20. Wetland Sample Point 1 view north
22. Wetland Sample Point 1—Surface water depth
24. Wetland Sample Point 1—soil profile
Project No. 18-221787.3
Appendix A: Site Photographs
25. Wetland Sample Point 2 view to the east—Wetland area A
27. Wetland Sample Point 2 view to the west—Wetland area A
29. Wetland Sample Point 2 soil profile—Wetland area A
26. Wetland Sample Point 2 view to the north—Wetland area A
28. Wetland Sample Point 2 view to the south—Wetland area A
30. Wetland area B
Project No. 18-221787.3
Appendix A: Site Photographs
25. Long Creek
27. Soil through hand lens at Wetland Sample Point 3
29. View east-southeast of Wetland Sample Point 3
26. Soil profile at Wetland Sample Point 3
28. View north of Wetland Sample Point 3
30. View south of Wetland Sample Point 3
Project No. 18-221787.3
Appendix A: Site Photographs
31. View of Wetland Sample Point 4
33. View south of Wetland Sample Point 4
35. View of Wetland Area B
32. View north of Wetland Sample Point 4
34. View west of Wetland Sample Point 4
36. View of typical flagging across the subject property
Project No. 18-221787.3
Appendix A: Site Photographs

APPENDIX B: SUPPORTING INFORMATION
8/15/2018 Print Map and Report
https://gis.gastongov.com/GastonGIS/PrintMapAndReport.aspx 1/1
Tax Information
LOCATION: FAIRVIEW DR
PID #: 135621
PIN #: 3537-70-0779
NBHD #: GA034
NBHD NAME: FAIRVIEW RD INDUSTRIAL
TOWNSHIP : GASTONIA TOWNSHIP
______________________________________
OWNER ID : 00661457
CURRENT OWNERS : GASTONIA
INDUSTRIAL REALTY CO
MAILING ADDRESS : PO BOX 876 ,
GASTONIA , NC 28053-0000
JANUARY 1st OWNERS: GASTONIA
INDUSTRIAL REALTY CO
Tax Information
DEED TYPE: WD
DEED BOOK: 0894 / PAGE: 0188
DEED RECORDING DATE: 05/19/1965
SALES AMOUNT: $0
______________________________________
PLAT BOOK: / PAGE:
LEGAL DESC. 1: .
LEGAL DESC. 2:
STRUCTURE TYPE:
YEAR BUILT: 0
SQUARE FOOTAGE: 0
BASEMENT: NO
BEDROOMS: 0 / BATHS: 0
MULTI-STRUCTURES: NO
ACREAGE: 37.17
DISTRICT CODE: 180
TAX DISTRICT: GASTONIA CITY
VOLUNTARY AG DISTRICT: NO
______________________________________
MARKET LAND VALUE: $146,062
MARKET IMPV. VALUE: $0
MARKET VALUE: $146,062
FARM DISCOUNT: NO
TAXABLE VALUE: $146,062
Election Information
PRECINCT NAME: HEALTH CENTER
POLLING PLACE: HIGHLAND HEALTH
CENTER
POLLING ADDRESS: 609 N HIGHLAND ST
WARD #: 4
CONGRESS REPRESENTATIVE: MEMBER
PATRICK MCHENRY
CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICT: 10
HOUSE REPRESENTATIVE:
REPRESENTATIVE KELLY E. HASTINGS
(REP)
HOUSE DISTRICT: 110
SENATOR: SENATOR KATHY HARRINGTON
(REP)
SENATE DISTRICT: 43
Parcel Information
POLICE DISTRICT: GASTONIA
FIRE DISTRICT: GASTONIA FD
EMS RESCUE:
STATION #: GEMS STATION 1
FLOOD: AE,0.2 PCT
CENSUS TRACT: 315,304.02
Disclaimer: The information provided is not to be considered as a legal document or description. The map & parcel data is believed to be accurate, but
Gaston County does not guarantee its accuracy. Values shown are as of January 1, 2015. - Document created for printing on 8/15/2018
8/15/2018 Print Map and Report
https://gis.gastongov.com/GastonGIS/PrintMapAndReport.aspx 1/1
Tax Information
LOCATION: FAIRVIEW DR
PID #: 135702
PIN #: 3537-50-6457
NBHD #: GA034
NBHD NAME: FAIRVIEW RD INDUSTRIAL
TOWNSHIP : GASTONIA TOWNSHIP
______________________________________
OWNER ID : 00661457
CURRENT OWNERS : GASTONIA
INDUSTRIAL REALTY CO
MAILING ADDRESS : PO BOX 876 ,
GASTONIA , NC 28053-0000
JANUARY 1st OWNERS: GASTONIA
INDUSTRIAL REALTY CO
Tax Information
DEED TYPE: WD
DEED BOOK: 1907 / PAGE: 0769
DEED RECORDING DATE: 04/01/1988
SALES AMOUNT: $117,000
______________________________________
PLAT BOOK: / PAGE:
LEGAL DESC. 1: .
LEGAL DESC. 2:
STRUCTURE TYPE:
YEAR BUILT: 0
SQUARE FOOTAGE: 0
BASEMENT: NO
BEDROOMS: 0 / BATHS: 0
MULTI-STRUCTURES: NO
ACREAGE: 43
DISTRICT CODE: 270
TAX DISTRICT: AG. CENTER FD
VOLUNTARY AG DISTRICT: NO
______________________________________
MARKET LAND VALUE: $180,000
MARKET IMPV. VALUE: $0
MARKET VALUE: $180,000
FARM DISCOUNT: NO
TAXABLE VALUE: $180,000
Election Information
PRECINCT NAME: HEALTH CENTER
POLLING PLACE: HIGHLAND HEALTH
CENTER
POLLING ADDRESS: 609 N HIGHLAND ST
WARD #:
CONGRESS REPRESENTATIVE: MEMBER
PATRICK MCHENRY
CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICT: 10
HOUSE REPRESENTATIVE:
REPRESENTATIVE KELLY E. HASTINGS
(REP)
HOUSE DISTRICT: 110
SENATOR: SENATOR KATHY HARRINGTON
(REP)
SENATE DISTRICT: 43
Parcel Information
POLICE DISTRICT: GASTON COUNTY
FIRE DISTRICT: AG CENTER
EMS RESCUE:
STATION #: GEMS STATION 1
FLOOD:
CENSUS TRACT: 315
Disclaimer: The information provided is not to be considered as a legal document or description. The map & parcel data is believed to be accurate, but
Gaston County does not guarantee its accuracy. Values shown are as of January 1, 2015. - Document created for printing on 8/15/2018
8/15/2018 Print Map and Report
https://gis.gastongov.com/GastonGIS/PrintMapAndReport.aspx 1/1
Tax Information
LOCATION: HWY 275 .
PID #: 222326
PIN #: 3537-61-6575
NBHD #: GA034
NBHD NAME: FAIRVIEW RD INDUSTRIAL
TOWNSHIP : GASTONIA TOWNSHIP
______________________________________
OWNER ID : 00661457
CURRENT OWNERS : GASTONIA
INDUSTRIAL REALTY CO
MAILING ADDRESS : PO BOX 876 ,
GASTONIA , NC 28053-0000
JANUARY 1st OWNERS: GASTONIA
INDUSTRIAL REALTY CO
Tax Information
DEED TYPE:
DEED BOOK: 0894 / PAGE: 0188
DEED RECORDING DATE: 00/00/0000
SALES AMOUNT: $0
______________________________________
PLAT BOOK: 000 / PAGE: 000
LEGAL DESC. 1: .
LEGAL DESC. 2:
STRUCTURE TYPE:
YEAR BUILT: 0
SQUARE FOOTAGE: 0
BASEMENT: NO
BEDROOMS: 0 / BATHS: 0
MULTI-STRUCTURES: NO
ACREAGE: 30.07
DISTRICT CODE: 270
TAX DISTRICT: AG. CENTER FD
VOLUNTARY AG DISTRICT: NO
______________________________________
MARKET LAND VALUE: $114,262
MARKET IMPV. VALUE: $0
MARKET VALUE: $114,262
FARM DISCOUNT: NO
TAXABLE VALUE: $114,262
Election Information
PRECINCT NAME: HEALTH CENTER
POLLING PLACE: HIGHLAND HEALTH
CENTER
POLLING ADDRESS: 609 N HIGHLAND ST
WARD #:
CONGRESS REPRESENTATIVE: MEMBER
PATRICK MCHENRY
CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICT: 10
HOUSE REPRESENTATIVE:
REPRESENTATIVE KELLY E. HASTINGS
(REP)
HOUSE DISTRICT: 110
SENATOR: SENATOR KATHY HARRINGTON
(REP)
SENATE DISTRICT: 43
Parcel Information
POLICE DISTRICT: GASTON COUNTY
FIRE DISTRICT: AG CENTER
EMS RESCUE:
STATION #: GEMS STATION 1
FLOOD: AE,0.2 PCT
CENSUS TRACT: 315,304.02
Disclaimer: The information provided is not to be considered as a legal document or description. The map & parcel data is believed to be accurate, but
Gaston County does not guarantee its accuracy. Values shown are as of January 1, 2015. - Document created for printing on 8/15/2018
2/8/2019 COG Municipal Operations Center (MOC) Weather | Personal Weather Station: KNCGASTO28 by Wunderground.com | Weather Undergr…
https://www.wunderground.com/personal-weather-station/dashboard?ID=KNCGASTO28#history/tdata/s20190121/e20190128/mweek 1/16
COG Municipal Operations Center (MOC) KNCGASTO28 About this PWS | Report | Comments
Forecast for Gastonia, NC > 35.282 -81.177 > 787 ft
This PWS is not reporting
Last updated: 2/7/2019, 2:30:28 PM,
15 minutes ago
78.2 °F
Feels Like 80 °F
Current Conditions
Udemy
8% Cash Back
Shop Now
Dollar General
4% Cash Back
Shop Now
Walmart
Up to 10% Cash Back
Shop Now
Amazon
Up to 10% Cash Back
Shop Now
ebates.com
Wind from South
Gusts 11.0 mph
4
mph
Dew Point:
63 °F
Humidity:
59%
Precip Rate:
0.00 in/hr
Precip Accum:
0.00 in
Pressure:
30.03 in
UV:
3
Solar:
2/8/2019 COG Municipal Operations Center (MOC) Weather | Personal Weather Station: KNCGASTO28 by Wunderground.com | Weather Undergr…
https://www.wunderground.com/personal-weather-station/dashboard?ID=KNCGASTO28#history/tdata/s20190121/e20190128/mweek 2/16
7:19 AM 5:58 PM
Waxing Crescent | 8% Illuminated
Next Previous
Weather History for Gastonia, NC [KNCGASTO28]
Weekly Mode
January 28
2019
--
Soil Moisture:
--
Soil Temp:
--
Leaf Wetness:
--
Radar Webcam

View WunderMap
 Icon
+
–
© Mapbox © OpenStreetMap | Improve this map
View
2/8/2019 COG Municipal Operations Center (MOC) Weather | Personal Weather Station: KNCGASTO28 by Wunderground.com | Weather Undergr…
https://www.wunderground.com/personal-weather-station/dashboard?ID=KNCGASTO28#history/tdata/s20190121/e20190128/mweek 3/16
High Low Average
Temperature 61.8 °F 19.4 °F 38.6 °F
Dew Point 60 °F 1 °F 25.9 °F
Humidity 100%23%65.2%
Precipitation 0.93 in ----
High Low Average
Wind Speed 11 mph --1.2 mph
Wind Gust 25 mph ----
Wind Direction ----SE
Pressure 30.75 in 29.55 in --
Summary
January 21, 2019 - January 28, 2019
Jan 20 Temperature Dew Point Humidity Wind Speed Gust Pressure Precip. Rate.Precip. Accum.
12:00 AM 24.8 °F 16 °F 69 %NNW 0 mph 0 mph 30.11 in 0 in 0 in
12:30 AM 24.8 °F 16 °F 68 %NNW 0 mph 0 mph 30.13 in 0 in 0 in
Jan 21 Temperature Dew Point Humidity Wind Speed Gust Pressure Precip. Rate.Precip. Accum.
1:00 AM 24.8 °F 18 °F 76 %NNW 0 mph 1 mph 30.15 in 0 in 0 in
1:30 AM 25.4 °F 16 °F 67 %NNW 3 mph 6 mph 30.16 in 0 in 0 in
2:00 AM 25.9 °F 13 °F 58 %NNW 1 mph 6 mph 30.18 in 0 in 0 in
2:30 AM 25.6 °F 11 °F 54 %North 3 mph 7 mph 30.2 in 0 in 0 in
3:00 AM 25.1 °F 10 °F 54 %NNE 4 mph 5 mph 30.22 in 0 in 0 in
3:30 AM 24.6 °F 10 °F 55 %North 3 mph 5 mph 30.23 in 0 in 0 in
4:00 AM 24 °F 10 °F 55 %North 4 mph 5 mph 30.24 in 0 in 0 in
4:30 AM 23.6 °F 9 °F 55 %NNE 1 mph 4 mph 30.25 in 0 in 0 in
5:00 AM 22.5 °F 10 °F 58 %NNW 0 mph 1 mph 30.26 in 0 in 0 in
5:30 AM 21.1 °F 10 °F 63 %NNW 0 mph 0 mph 30.27 in 0 in 0 in
Graphs Table
Weather History Table
January 21, 2019 - January 28, 2019
2/8/2019 COG Municipal Operations Center (MOC) Weather | Personal Weather Station: KNCGASTO28 by Wunderground.com | Weather Undergr…
https://www.wunderground.com/personal-weather-station/dashboard?ID=KNCGASTO28#history/tdata/s20190121/e20190128/mweek 4/16
Jan 20 Temperature Dew Point Humidity Wind Speed Gust Pressure Precip. Rate.Precip. Accum.
6:00 AM 20.7 °F 11 °F 66 %NNE 3 mph 3 mph 30.29 in 0 in 0 in
6:30 AM 20.6 °F 11 °F 66 %North 0 mph 1 mph 30.31 in 0 in 0 in
7:00 AM 19.9 °F 9 °F 64 %North 0 mph 1 mph 30.34 in 0 in 0 in
7:30 AM 19.6 °F 11 °F 69 %NNW 0 mph 1 mph 30.36 in 0 in 0 in
8:00 AM 19.5 °F 11 °F 69 %North 0 mph 1 mph 30.38 in 0 in 0 in
8:30 AM 21.6 °F 11 °F 65 %NNE 0 mph 3 mph 30.41 in 0 in 0 in
9:00 AM 23.3 °F 9 °F 55 %NNW 2 mph 6 mph 30.42 in 0 in 0 in
9:30 AM 24.1 °F 6 °F 47 %North 2 mph 8 mph 30.43 in 0 in 0 in
10:00 AM 25.4 °F 6 °F 43 %ENE 3 mph 8 mph 30.46 in 0 in 0 in
10:30 AM 26.9 °F 4 °F 38 %North 1 mph 8 mph 30.47 in 0 in 0 in
11:00 AM 28.5 °F 5 °F 36 %North 1 mph 12 mph 30.48 in 0 in 0 in
11:30 AM 29.8 °F 6 °F 36 %WSW 2 mph 4 mph 30.49 in 0 in 0 in
12:00 PM 30.8 °F 4 °F 32 %NE 6 mph 9 mph 30.49 in 0 in 0 in
12:30 PM 32 °F 1 °F 27 %NNW 2 mph 10 mph 30.48 in 0 in 0 in
1:00 PM 33.3 °F 2 °F 26 %North 4 mph 9 mph 30.48 in 0 in 0 in
1:30 PM 33.3 °F 2 °F 26 %NNE 1 mph 5 mph 30.48 in 0 in 0 in
2:00 PM 34.4 °F 2 °F 25 %NNE 4 mph 7 mph 30.47 in 0 in 0 in
2:30 PM 35.6 °F 3 °F 25 %North 0 mph 7 mph 30.48 in 0 in 0 in
3:00 PM 35.8 °F 2 °F 24 %NNE 4 mph 7 mph 30.48 in 0 in 0 in
3:30 PM 36.2 °F 2 °F 23 %NE 0 mph 6 mph 30.48 in 0 in 0 in
4:00 PM 35.8 °F 2 °F 24 %NNE 1 mph 7 mph 30.48 in 0 in 0 in
4:30 PM 35.1 °F 2 °F 24 %NNE 2 mph 3 mph 30.48 in 0 in 0 in
5:00 PM 34.6 °F 3 °F 26 %NE 0 mph 4 mph 30.5 in 0 in 0 in
5:30 PM 33.1 °F 2 °F 27 %NE 0 mph 2 mph 30.5 in 0 in 0 in
6:00 PM 31.1 °F 4 °F 32 %NE 0 mph 0 mph 30.51 in 0 in 0 in
6:30 PM 29.4 °F 3 °F 33 %NE 0 mph 0 mph 30.52 in 0 in 0 in
7:00 PM 28.2 °F 8 °F 42 %NE 0 mph 0 mph 30.53 in 0 in 0 in
7:30 PM 27.2 °F 10 °F 48 %NE 0 mph 0 mph 30.53 in 0 in 0 in
8:00 PM 26.8 °F 8 °F 46 %NE 0 mph 0 mph 30.54 in 0 in 0 in
8:30 PM 26.8 °F 12 °F 54 %NE 0 mph 1 mph 30.54 in 0 in 0 in
9:00 PM 26 °F 12 °F 56 %NE 0 mph 0 mph 30.54 in 0 in 0 in
2/8/2019 COG Municipal Operations Center (MOC) Weather | Personal Weather Station: KNCGASTO28 by Wunderground.com | Weather Undergr…
https://www.wunderground.com/personal-weather-station/dashboard?ID=KNCGASTO28#history/tdata/s20190121/e20190128/mweek 5/16
Jan 20 Temperature Dew Point Humidity Wind Speed Gust Pressure Precip. Rate.Precip. Accum.
9:30 PM 25.3 °F 14 °F 63 %NE 0 mph 1 mph 30.55 in 0 in 0 in
10:00 PM 24.5 °F 13 °F 63 %NE 0 mph 0 mph 30.56 in 0 in 0 in
10:30 PM 24 °F 17 °F 75 %NE 0 mph 1 mph 30.57 in 0 in 0 in
11:00 PM 23.1 °F 16 °F 74 %NE 0 mph 1 mph 30.57 in 0 in 0 in
11:30 PM 23.7 °F 15 °F 70 %NE 0 mph 1 mph 30.59 in 0 in 0 in
12:00 AM 22.9 °F 18 °F 80 %NE 0 mph 0 mph 30.59 in 0 in 0 in
12:30 AM 22.4 °F 16 °F 77 %NE 0 mph 0 mph 30.59 in 0 in 0 in
Jan 22 Temperature Dew Point Humidity Wind Speed Gust Pressure Precip. Rate.Precip. Accum.
1:00 AM 22.4 °F 14 °F 71 %NE 0 mph 0 mph 30.59 in 0 in 0 in
1:30 AM 23.8 °F 13 °F 63 %NE 0 mph 1 mph 30.61 in 0 in 0 in
2:00 AM 22 °F 13 °F 68 %NE 0 mph 1 mph 30.61 in 0 in 0 in
2:30 AM 22.4 °F 13 °F 67 %NE 0 mph 0 mph 30.62 in 0 in 0 in
3:00 AM 22.3 °F 12 °F 64 %NE 0 mph 0 mph 30.61 in 0 in 0 in
3:30 AM 22.5 °F 14 °F 71 %NE 0 mph 1 mph 30.62 in 0 in 0 in
4:00 AM 22.1 °F 13 °F 68 %NE 0 mph 1 mph 30.63 in 0 in 0 in
4:30 AM 22.5 °F 14 °F 71 %NE 0 mph 1 mph 30.63 in 0 in 0 in
5:00 AM 21.3 °F 12 °F 67 %NE 0 mph 1 mph 30.64 in 0 in 0 in
5:30 AM 21.6 °F 12 °F 66 %NE 0 mph 1 mph 30.66 in 0 in 0 in
6:00 AM 21.3 °F 14 °F 74 %NE 0 mph 1 mph 30.66 in 0 in 0 in
6:30 AM 21.5 °F 13 °F 69 %NE 1 mph 2 mph 30.68 in 0 in 0 in
7:00 AM 21.2 °F 12 °F 69 %NE 0 mph 1 mph 30.7 in 0 in 0 in
7:30 AM 20.9 °F 12 °F 69 %NE 1 mph 1 mph 30.72 in 0 in 0 in
8:00 AM 20.8 °F 13 °F 72 %NE 0 mph 1 mph 30.73 in 0 in 0 in
8:30 AM 22.9 °F 12 °F 64 %NNE 2 mph 3 mph 30.73 in 0 in 0 in
9:00 AM 24.8 °F 10 °F 54 %NE 3 mph 5 mph 30.73 in 0 in 0 in
9:30 AM 26.9 °F 8 °F 45 %East 0 mph 5 mph 30.73 in 0 in 0 in
10:00 AM 29.8 °F 9 °F 41 %NE 3 mph 7 mph 30.74 in 0 in 0 in
10:30 AM 31.8 °F 8 °F 37 %NE 0 mph 3 mph 30.74 in 0 in 0 in
11:00 AM 31.7 °F 8 °F 37 %NNE 2 mph 6 mph 30.73 in 0 in 0 in
11:30 AM 34.3 °F 8 °F 34 %NE 7 mph 7 mph 30.73 in 0 in 0 in
12:15 PM 36.3 °F 8 °F 31 %SSW 3 mph 7 mph 30.7 in 0 in 0 in
2/8/2019 COG Municipal Operations Center (MOC) Weather | Personal Weather Station: KNCGASTO28 by Wunderground.com | Weather Undergr…
https://www.wunderground.com/personal-weather-station/dashboard?ID=KNCGASTO28#history/tdata/s20190121/e20190128/mweek 6/16
Jan 20 Temperature Dew Point Humidity Wind Speed Gust Pressure Precip. Rate.Precip. Accum.
12:45 PM 38 °F 8 °F 29 %NNE 4 mph 7 mph 30.69 in 0 in 0 in
1:15 PM 37.8 °F 9 °F 30 %NNE 2 mph 5 mph 30.67 in 0 in 0 in
1:45 PM 38.4 °F 9 °F 29 %NNE 2 mph 4 mph 30.64 in 0 in 0 in
2:15 PM 40.8 °F 8 °F 26 %SSE 2 mph 5 mph 30.64 in 0 in 0 in
2:45 PM 41.5 °F 7 °F 24 %NNE 0 mph 6 mph 30.63 in 0 in 0 in
3:15 PM 42.2 °F 8 °F 24 %SSW 1 mph 5 mph 30.63 in 0 in 0 in
3:45 PM 41.7 °F 9 °F 26 %SSE 0 mph 7 mph 30.62 in 0 in 0 in
4:15 PM 40.7 °F 9 °F 27 %NE 2 mph 7 mph 30.61 in 0 in 0 in
4:45 PM 40.6 °F 9 °F 27 %NE 1 mph 5 mph 30.61 in 0 in 0 in
5:15 PM 40.3 °F 10 °F 29 %East 0 mph 4 mph 30.6 in 0 in 0 in
5:45 PM 39.7 °F 10 °F 29 %SSE 0 mph 3 mph 30.6 in 0 in 0 in
6:15 PM 38.5 °F 11 °F 32 %SSE 0 mph 2 mph 30.61 in 0 in 0 in
6:45 PM 37.7 °F 12 °F 34 %SSE 0 mph 1 mph 30.61 in 0 in 0 in
7:15 PM 38.1 °F 13 °F 36 %SE 0 mph 1 mph 30.61 in 0 in 0 in
7:45 PM 38.7 °F 14 °F 37 %East 0 mph 1 mph 30.61 in 0 in 0 in
8:15 PM 38.7 °F 14 °F 37 %ESE 0 mph 1 mph 30.61 in 0 in 0 in
8:45 PM 38.5 °F 15 °F 39 %East 3 mph 6 mph 30.58 in 0 in 0 in
9:15 PM 38.5 °F 15 °F 38 %ESE 0 mph 8 mph 30.6 in 0 in 0 in
10:00 PM 38.5 °F 15 °F 39 %SE 0 mph 2 mph 30.6 in 0 in 0 in
10:30 PM 37.7 °F 17 °F 44 %SE 0 mph 1 mph 30.6 in 0 in 0 in
11:00 PM 37.3 °F 18 °F 46 %NNE 0 mph 0 mph 30.59 in 0 in 0 in
11:30 PM 37.2 °F 18 °F 45 %NNE 0 mph 1 mph 30.58 in 0 in 0 in
12:00 AM 37.1 °F 17 °F 45 %NNE 0 mph 1 mph 30.57 in 0 in 0 in
12:30 AM 37.1 °F 17 °F 45 %NNE 0 mph 1 mph 30.57 in 0 in 0 in
Jan 23 Temperature Dew Point Humidity Wind Speed Gust Pressure Precip. Rate.Precip. Accum.
1:00 AM 36.7 °F 21 °F 53 %NNE 0 mph 1 mph 30.55 in 0 in 0 in
1:30 AM 35.8 °F 23 °F 59 %NNE 0 mph 1 mph 30.54 in 0 in 0 in
2:00 AM 35.9 °F 24 °F 63 %NNW 0 mph 3 mph 30.53 in 0 in 0 in
2:30 AM 35.9 °F 24 °F 62 %NNE 4 mph 4 mph 30.52 in 0 in 0 in
3:00 AM 35.3 °F 25 °F 65 %NNE 2 mph 4 mph 30.51 in 0 in 0 in
3:30 AM 34.7 °F 25 °F 68 %NNE 3 mph 5 mph 30.49 in 0 in 0 in
2/8/2019 COG Municipal Operations Center (MOC) Weather | Personal Weather Station: KNCGASTO28 by Wunderground.com | Weather Undergr…
https://www.wunderground.com/personal-weather-station/dashboard?ID=KNCGASTO28#history/tdata/s20190121/e20190128/mweek 7/16
Jan 20 Temperature Dew Point Humidity Wind Speed Gust Pressure Precip. Rate.Precip. Accum.
4:00 AM 33.7 °F 27 °F 77 %NNE 2 mph 3 mph 30.48 in 0 in 0 in
4:30 AM 33.6 °F 27 °F 76 %North 3 mph 5 mph 30.47 in 0 in 0 in
5:00 AM 33.6 °F 28 °F 79 %NE 0 mph 4 mph 30.45 in 0 in 0 in
5:30 AM 33.3 °F 28 °F 80 %NNE 3 mph 7 mph 30.42 in 0 in 0 in
6:00 AM 33.5 °F 29 °F 82 %NNE 3 mph 3 mph 30.42 in 0 in 0 in
6:30 AM 33 °F 28 °F 83 %NE 2 mph 5 mph 30.42 in 0 in 0 in
7:00 AM 32.9 °F 29 °F 84 %NE 3 mph 6 mph 30.41 in 0 in 0 in
7:30 AM 32.8 °F 29 °F 86 %NNE 1 mph 3 mph 30.4 in 0 in 0 in
8:00 AM 32.8 °F 30 °F 88 %NNE 1 mph 4 mph 30.39 in 0.01 in 0.01 in
8:30 AM 32.2 °F 31 °F 94 %NW 0 mph 3 mph 30.39 in 0.04 in 0.04 in
9:00 AM 32.1 °F 31 °F 95 %NNE 1 mph 4 mph 30.39 in 0.04 in 0.05 in
9:30 AM 32.3 °F 31 °F 96 %NNE 4 mph 5 mph 30.38 in 0.01 in 0.05 in
10:00 AM 32.7 °F 32 °F 96 %NNE 1 mph 5 mph 30.39 in 0.04 in 0.09 in
10:30 AM 33.3 °F 33 °F 97 %North 3 mph 4 mph 30.38 in 0.13 in 0.18 in
11:00 AM 33.8 °F 33 °F 97 %NNE 5 mph 6 mph 30.35 in 0.14 in 0.23 in
11:30 AM 35.4 °F 35 °F 98 %ENE 1 mph 5 mph 30.33 in 0.05 in 0.24 in
12:00 PM 36.3 °F 36 °F 97 %North 2 mph 2 mph 30.3 in 0.01 in 0.24 in
12:30 PM 38.6 °F 38 °F 97 %NNE 3 mph 3 mph 30.27 in 0 in 0.24 in
1:00 PM 40.4 °F 39 °F 96 %North 0 mph 2 mph 30.25 in 0 in 0.24 in
1:30 PM 40.9 °F 40 °F 97 %NNE 0 mph 4 mph 30.22 in 0 in 0.24 in
2:00 PM 41.6 °F 41 °F 96 %NE 2 mph 4 mph 30.19 in 0 in 0.24 in
2:30 PM 42.2 °F 41 °F 96 %NNE 0 mph 3 mph 30.18 in 0 in 0.24 in
3:00 PM 43 °F 42 °F 95 %North 1 mph 8 mph 30.14 in 0 in 0.24 in
3:30 PM 43.5 °F 42 °F 94 %North 4 mph 5 mph 30.12 in 0 in 0.24 in
4:00 PM 43.2 °F 42 °F 95 %NNW 1 mph 7 mph 30.1 in 0 in 0.24 in
4:30 PM 44.4 °F 43 °F 95 %NNW 1 mph 3 mph 30.09 in 0 in 0.24 in
5:00 PM 45.2 °F 44 °F 94 %NE 2 mph 5 mph 30.06 in 0 in 0.24 in
5:30 PM 45.4 °F 44 °F 94 %NE 5 mph 6 mph 30.04 in 0 in 0.24 in
6:00 PM 45.3 °F 44 °F 94 %NNE 4 mph 6 mph 30.02 in 0 in 0.24 in
6:30 PM 44.9 °F 43 °F 94 %East 2 mph 6 mph 29.99 in 0 in 0.24 in
7:00 PM 45 °F 44 °F 95 %NNW 0 mph 2 mph 29.99 in 0 in 0.24 in
2/8/2019 COG Municipal Operations Center (MOC) Weather | Personal Weather Station: KNCGASTO28 by Wunderground.com | Weather Undergr…
https://www.wunderground.com/personal-weather-station/dashboard?ID=KNCGASTO28#history/tdata/s20190121/e20190128/mweek 8/16
Jan 20 Temperature Dew Point Humidity Wind Speed Gust Pressure Precip. Rate.Precip. Accum.
7:30 PM 44.9 °F 44 °F 95 %NNE 2 mph 4 mph 29.97 in 0 in 0.24 in
8:00 PM 44.6 °F 43 °F 95 %NE 0 mph 3 mph 29.95 in 0 in 0.24 in
8:30 PM 44.6 °F 44 °F 96 %North 1 mph 2 mph 29.94 in 0 in 0.24 in
9:00 PM 44.8 °F 44 °F 96 %NNE 0 mph 1 mph 29.91 in 0 in 0.24 in
9:30 PM 45.1 °F 44 °F 96 %NNE 0 mph 2 mph 29.9 in 0 in 0.24 in
10:00 PM 49.2 °F 49 °F 100 %SSE 1 mph 5 mph 29.86 in 0 in 0.24 in
10:30 PM 58.6 °F 58 °F 96 %South 7 mph 12 mph 29.84 in 0 in 0.24 in
11:00 PM 59.3 °F 58 °F 95 %South 5 mph 16 mph 29.84 in 0.03 in 0.27 in
11:30 PM 59.4 °F 58 °F 96 %SSE 5 mph 14 mph 29.82 in 0.07 in 0.31 in
12:00 AM 59.4 °F 59 °F 97 %SSE 8 mph 19 mph 29.8 in 0.15 in 0 in
12:30 AM 59.4 °F 59 °F 98 %SSW 3 mph 19 mph 29.78 in 0.18 in 0.08 in
Jan 24 Temperature Dew Point Humidity Wind Speed Gust Pressure Precip. Rate.Precip. Accum.
1:00 AM 59.6 °F 59 °F 98 %SSW 8 mph 13 mph 29.74 in 0.15 in 0.15 in
1:30 AM 60.3 °F 60 °F 98 %SW 8 mph 21 mph 29.71 in 0.11 in 0.19 in
2:00 AM 61.1 °F 60 °F 97 %SSE 8 mph 18 mph 29.71 in 0.09 in 0.24 in
2:30 AM 61.8 °F 60 °F 94 %SE 7 mph 25 mph 29.7 in 0.08 in 0.27 in
3:00 AM 60.9 °F 60 °F 97 %SW 7 mph 11 mph 29.69 in 0.06 in 0.3 in
3:30 AM 60.4 °F 60 °F 98 %SSW 3 mph 10 mph 29.66 in 0.07 in 0.34 in
4:00 AM 60.1 °F 60 °F 99 %South 6 mph 13 mph 29.65 in 0.08 in 0.38 in
4:30 AM 60.7 °F 60 °F 97 %SSW 6 mph 21 mph 29.64 in 0.05 in 0.4 in
5:00 AM 60.7 °F 60 °F 98 %SSW 9 mph 19 mph 29.63 in 0.09 in 0.47 in
5:30 AM 60.6 °F 60 °F 98 %SSE 3 mph 9 mph 29.61 in 0.1 in 0.5 in
6:00 AM 60.7 °F 60 °F 98 %SSW 6 mph 16 mph 29.59 in 0.04 in 0.51 in
6:30 AM 60.4 °F 60 °F 98 %SSW 3 mph 7 mph 29.57 in 0.05 in 0.55 in
7:00 AM 60.2 °F 60 °F 99 %SW 2 mph 9 mph 29.56 in 0.05 in 0.56 in
7:30 AM 60 °F 60 °F 99 %SSW 0 mph 7 mph 29.55 in 0.01 in 0.56 in
8:00 AM 59 °F 58 °F 96 %WSW 2 mph 6 mph 29.57 in 0 in 0.56 in
8:30 AM 58.2 °F 57 °F 95 %SSW 1 mph 10 mph 29.58 in 0 in 0.56 in
9:00 AM 57.5 °F 56 °F 95 %SSW 3 mph 5 mph 29.6 in 0 in 0.56 in
9:30 AM 57 °F 55 °F 94 %SE 2 mph 6 mph 29.61 in 0 in 0.56 in
10:00 AM 56.2 °F 55 °F 94 %West 3 mph 11 mph 29.63 in 0.01 in 0.57 in
2/8/2019 COG Municipal Operations Center (MOC) Weather | Personal Weather Station: KNCGASTO28 by Wunderground.com | Weather Undergr…
https://www.wunderground.com/personal-weather-station/dashboard?ID=KNCGASTO28#history/tdata/s20190121/e20190128/mweek 9/16
Jan 20 Temperature Dew Point Humidity Wind Speed Gust Pressure Precip. Rate.Precip. Accum.
10:30 AM 56.5 °F 55 °F 93 %West 1 mph 9 mph 29.64 in 0.01 in 0.57 in
11:00 AM 56.7 °F 54 °F 91 %SSE 2 mph 8 mph 29.67 in 0 in 0.57 in
11:30 AM 58.4 °F 55 °F 89 %NW 0 mph 8 mph 29.65 in 0 in 0.57 in
12:00 PM 57.5 °F 50 °F 75 %WSW 0 mph 8 mph 29.68 in 0 in 0.57 in
12:30 PM 57.8 °F 48 °F 71 %WNW 4 mph 10 mph 29.68 in 0 in 0.57 in
1:00 PM 59.8 °F 48 °F 66 %WSW 1 mph 8 mph 29.68 in 0 in 0.57 in
1:30 PM 60 °F 46 °F 61 %WNW 5 mph 9 mph 29.68 in 0 in 0.57 in
2:00 PM 60.4 °F 44 °F 55 %SSE 3 mph 10 mph 29.69 in 0 in 0.57 in
2:30 PM 60 °F 38 °F 44 %WNW 2 mph 7 mph 29.71 in 0 in 0.57 in
3:00 PM 59.3 °F 35 °F 40 %WNW 3 mph 10 mph 29.73 in 0 in 0.57 in
3:30 PM 58 °F 37 °F 46 %NE 0 mph 7 mph 29.76 in 0 in 0.57 in
4:00 PM 56.1 °F 35 °F 45 %WNW 2 mph 6 mph 29.79 in 0 in 0.57 in
4:30 PM 53.6 °F 32 °F 44 %NNW 3 mph 5 mph 29.8 in 0 in 0.57 in
5:00 PM 52.1 °F 30 °F 43 %NNW 2 mph 7 mph 29.82 in 0 in 0.57 in
5:30 PM 49.9 °F 27 °F 42 %NW 2 mph 6 mph 29.84 in 0 in 0.57 in
6:00 PM 48 °F 25 °F 41 %NNW 0 mph 8 mph 29.86 in 0 in 0.57 in
6:30 PM 45.8 °F 24 °F 42 %North 0 mph 6 mph 29.88 in 0 in 0.57 in
7:00 PM 43.7 °F 25 °F 49 %NW 2 mph 4 mph 29.91 in 0 in 0.57 in
7:30 PM 42.2 °F 27 °F 55 %NW 0 mph 5 mph 29.92 in 0 in 0.57 in
8:00 PM 40.7 °F 26 °F 57 %NNW 3 mph 4 mph 29.94 in 0 in 0.57 in
8:30 PM 39.5 °F 26 °F 59 %NNW 0 mph 4 mph 29.97 in 0 in 0.57 in
9:00 PM 38.3 °F 26 °F 62 %NNW 0 mph 2 mph 29.98 in 0 in 0.57 in
9:30 PM 37.2 °F 26 °F 64 %NW 2 mph 5 mph 29.99 in 0 in 0.57 in
10:00 PM 35.8 °F 26 °F 67 %WNW 0 mph 1 mph 29.99 in 0 in 0.57 in
10:30 PM 34.6 °F 26 °F 70 %NNW 0 mph 1 mph 29.99 in 0 in 0.57 in
11:00 PM 33.8 °F 26 °F 72 %NNW 0 mph 2 mph 30 in 0 in 0.57 in
11:30 PM 33.6 °F 25 °F 72 %North 1 mph 2 mph 30 in 0 in 0.57 in
12:00 AM 32.6 °F 25 °F 73 %North 0 mph 1 mph 30 in 0 in 0.57 in
12:30 AM 32.1 °F 25 °F 74 %North 1 mph 2 mph 30 in 0 in 0 in
Jan 25 Temperature Dew Point Humidity Wind Speed Gust Pressure Precip. Rate.Precip. Accum.
1:00 AM 31.5 °F 25 °F 76 %NNW 0 mph 1 mph 30.01 in 0 in 0 in
2/8/2019 COG Municipal Operations Center (MOC) Weather | Personal Weather Station: KNCGASTO28 by Wunderground.com | Weather Undergr…
https://www.wunderground.com/personal-weather-station/dashboard?ID=KNCGASTO28#history/tdata/s20190121/e20190128/mweek 10/16
Jan 20 Temperature Dew Point Humidity Wind Speed Gust Pressure Precip. Rate.Precip. Accum.
1:30 AM 29.8 °F 25 °F 81 %NNW 0 mph 1 mph 30.02 in 0 in 0 in
2:00 AM 30.1 °F 25 °F 80 %NNW 0 mph 1 mph 30.03 in 0 in 0 in
2:30 AM 31 °F 24 °F 76 %NNW 1 mph 2 mph 30.04 in 0 in 0 in
3:00 AM 30.7 °F 24 °F 76 %NW 0 mph 0 mph 30.06 in 0 in 0 in
3:30 AM 29.5 °F 24 °F 79 %SW 0 mph 1 mph 30.08 in 0 in 0 in
4:00 AM 28.6 °F 24 °F 83 %SW 0 mph 0 mph 30.09 in 0 in 0 in
4:30 AM 27.9 °F 25 °F 88 %SW 0 mph 1 mph 30.09 in 0 in 0 in
5:00 AM 27.3 °F 24 °F 88 %SSW 0 mph 0 mph 30.1 in 0 in 0 in
5:30 AM 26.9 °F 24 °F 89 %SSW 0 mph 0 mph 30.11 in 0 in 0 in
6:00 AM 26.5 °F 24 °F 90 %SSW 0 mph 0 mph 30.13 in 0 in 0 in
6:30 AM 26.1 °F 24 °F 92 %SSW 0 mph 0 mph 30.14 in 0 in 0 in
7:00 AM 25.5 °F 24 °F 94 %SSW 0 mph 0 mph 30.14 in 0 in 0 in
7:30 AM 25.6 °F 24 °F 95 %SSW 0 mph 0 mph 30.15 in 0 in 0 in
8:00 AM 25.9 °F 25 °F 96 %SSW 0 mph 0 mph 30.17 in 0 in 0 in
8:30 AM 30.2 °F 29 °F 93 %SSW 0 mph 1 mph 30.18 in 0 in 0 in
9:00 AM 32.7 °F 28 °F 81 %WSW 0 mph 1 mph 30.19 in 0 in 0 in
9:30 AM 36.6 °F 28 °F 71 %WSW 0 mph 2 mph 30.2 in 0 in 0 in
10:00 AM 38.9 °F 26 °F 61 %West 0 mph 4 mph 30.2 in 0 in 0 in
10:30 AM 39.9 °F 26 °F 59 %NNE 0 mph 5 mph 30.23 in 0 in 0 in
11:00 AM 41.6 °F 26 °F 54 %North 0 mph 6 mph 30.23 in 0 in 0 in
11:30 AM 43.3 °F 27 °F 52 %SSW 1 mph 4 mph 30.22 in 0 in 0 in
12:00 PM 45 °F 27 °F 49 %SW 1 mph 5 mph 30.21 in 0 in 0 in
12:30 PM 45.7 °F 26 °F 46 %NW 3 mph 5 mph 30.21 in 0 in 0 in
1:00 PM 46.6 °F 27 °F 46 %ESE 2 mph 5 mph 30.2 in 0 in 0 in
1:45 PM 47.9 °F 26 °F 43 %WSW 1 mph 5 mph 30.19 in 0 in 0 in
2:15 PM 48.5 °F 25 °F 40 %WNW 2 mph 4 mph 30.18 in 0 in 0 in
2:45 PM 49.8 °F 26 °F 39 %SSW 3 mph 4 mph 30.18 in 0 in 0 in
3:30 PM 49.7 °F 24 °F 37 %SSE 1 mph 3 mph 30.19 in 0 in 0 in
4:00 PM 49.1 °F 22 °F 34 %WNW 1 mph 3 mph 30.2 in 0 in 0 in
4:30 PM 47.4 °F 21 °F 36 %SW 0 mph 2 mph 30.2 in 0 in 0 in
5:00 PM 46.9 °F 22 °F 37 %SSW 0 mph 2 mph 30.2 in 0 in 0 in
2/8/2019 COG Municipal Operations Center (MOC) Weather | Personal Weather Station: KNCGASTO28 by Wunderground.com | Weather Undergr…
https://www.wunderground.com/personal-weather-station/dashboard?ID=KNCGASTO28#history/tdata/s20190121/e20190128/mweek 11/16
Jan 20 Temperature Dew Point Humidity Wind Speed Gust Pressure Precip. Rate.Precip. Accum.
5:30 PM 45 °F 21 °F 38 %SSW 0 mph 1 mph 30.19 in 0 in 0 in
6:00 PM 43.4 °F 19 °F 37 %NNE 1 mph 2 mph 30.21 in 0 in 0 in
6:30 PM 41 °F 17 °F 38 %NNE 0 mph 0 mph 30.21 in 0 in 0 in
7:00 PM 39.7 °F 18 °F 41 %NNE 0 mph 0 mph 30.23 in 0 in 0 in
7:30 PM 36.4 °F 16 °F 43 %NNE 0 mph 0 mph 30.23 in 0 in 0 in
8:00 PM 34.1 °F 18 °F 52 %NNE 0 mph 0 mph 30.23 in 0 in 0 in
8:30 PM 32.4 °F 21 °F 63 %NNE 0 mph 1 mph 30.24 in 0 in 0 in
9:00 PM 31.7 °F 21 °F 66 %NNE 0 mph 0 mph 30.24 in 0 in 0 in
9:30 PM 30 °F 23 °F 75 %NNE 0 mph 0 mph 30.25 in 0 in 0 in
10:00 PM 29.3 °F 23 °F 76 %NNE 0 mph 0 mph 30.26 in 0 in 0 in
10:30 PM 27.6 °F 23 °F 84 %NNE 0 mph 0 mph 30.26 in 0 in 0 in
11:00 PM 26.8 °F 24 °F 87 %NNE 0 mph 0 mph 30.26 in 0 in 0 in
11:30 PM 26.4 °F 24 °F 90 %NNE 0 mph 0 mph 30.26 in 0 in 0 in
12:00 AM 25.7 °F 24 °F 91 %NNE 0 mph 0 mph 30.26 in 0 in 0 in
12:30 AM 26.1 °F 24 °F 91 %SW 0 mph 2 mph 30.27 in 0 in 0 in
Jan 26 Temperature Dew Point Humidity Wind Speed Gust Pressure Precip. Rate.Precip. Accum.
1:00 AM 26 °F 24 °F 92 %East 0 mph 1 mph 30.26 in 0 in 0 in
1:30 AM 25.5 °F 24 °F 93 %WNW 0 mph 1 mph 30.26 in 0 in 0 in
2:00 AM 24 °F 22 °F 93 %NW 0 mph 0 mph 30.26 in 0 in 0 in
2:30 AM 24.2 °F 23 °F 94 %WSW 0 mph 0 mph 30.26 in 0 in 0 in
3:00 AM 23.5 °F 22 °F 95 %WSW 0 mph 0 mph 30.27 in 0 in 0 in
3:30 AM 22.5 °F 22 °F 96 %SSW 0 mph 1 mph 30.27 in 0 in 0 in
4:00 AM 22.4 °F 22 °F 96 %South 0 mph 0 mph 30.27 in 0 in 0 in
4:30 AM 22 °F 21 °F 96 %South 0 mph 0 mph 30.26 in 0 in 0 in
5:00 AM 21.7 °F 21 °F 96 %South 0 mph 0 mph 30.25 in 0 in 0 in
5:30 AM 21 °F 20 °F 96 %South 0 mph 0 mph 30.25 in 0 in 0 in
6:00 AM 20.7 °F 20 °F 96 %South 0 mph 0 mph 30.25 in 0 in 0 in
6:30 AM 20.7 °F 20 °F 97 %South 0 mph 0 mph 30.24 in 0 in 0 in
7:00 AM 21 °F 20 °F 96 %South 0 mph 0 mph 30.25 in 0 in 0 in
7:30 AM 21.1 °F 20 °F 95 %South 0 mph 0 mph 30.25 in 0 in 0 in
8:00 AM 21.3 °F 20 °F 96 %South 0 mph 0 mph 30.27 in 0 in 0 in
2/8/2019 COG Municipal Operations Center (MOC) Weather | Personal Weather Station: KNCGASTO28 by Wunderground.com | Weather Undergr…
https://www.wunderground.com/personal-weather-station/dashboard?ID=KNCGASTO28#history/tdata/s20190121/e20190128/mweek 12/16
Jan 20 Temperature Dew Point Humidity Wind Speed Gust Pressure Precip. Rate.Precip. Accum.
8:30 AM 25.2 °F 24 °F 93 %South 0 mph 1 mph 30.28 in 0 in 0 in
9:00 AM 27.4 °F 23 °F 82 %NNE 0 mph 1 mph 30.28 in 0 in 0 in
9:30 AM 32.8 °F 25 °F 72 %NNE 1 mph 1 mph 30.29 in 0 in 0 in
10:00 AM 34.5 °F 24 °F 65 %NNW 0 mph 3 mph 30.29 in 0 in 0 in
10:30 AM 38.5 °F 23 °F 55 %SE 0 mph 2 mph 30.3 in 0 in 0 in
11:00 AM 40.6 °F 21 °F 45 %North 3 mph 3 mph 30.3 in 0 in 0 in
11:30 AM 43.1 °F 19 °F 38 %NNE 2 mph 3 mph 30.28 in 0 in 0 in
12:00 PM 45.1 °F 18 °F 34 %WSW 1 mph 2 mph 30.27 in 0 in 0 in
12:30 PM 47.9 °F 18 °F 31 %SE 0 mph 3 mph 30.24 in 0 in 0 in
1:00 PM 48.9 °F 19 °F 31 %NW 5 mph 5 mph 30.23 in 0 in 0 in
1:30 PM 49.6 °F 20 °F 31 %NW 2 mph 4 mph 30.21 in 0 in 0 in
2:00 PM 51.6 °F 22 °F 31 %SSW 2 mph 8 mph 30.21 in 0 in 0 in
2:30 PM 51.6 °F 22 °F 31 %NNW 3 mph 7 mph 30.2 in 0 in 0 in
3:00 PM 51.3 °F 21 °F 30 %SW 0 mph 5 mph 30.19 in 0 in 0 in
3:30 PM 52.1 °F 21 °F 29 %South 2 mph 3 mph 30.19 in 0 in 0 in
4:00 PM 50.6 °F 20 °F 30 %SSW 6 mph 6 mph 30.18 in 0 in 0 in
4:30 PM 49 °F 22 °F 34 %WSW 0 mph 5 mph 30.18 in 0 in 0 in
5:00 PM 48.5 °F 22 °F 36 %NNW 0 mph 5 mph 30.18 in 0 in 0 in
5:30 PM 47.5 °F 23 °F 39 %SSE 0 mph 6 mph 30.19 in 0 in 0 in
6:00 PM 45.5 °F 22 °F 40 %SSE 0 mph 4 mph 30.19 in 0 in 0 in
6:30 PM 43.9 °F 22 °F 42 %South 0 mph 3 mph 30.2 in 0 in 0 in
7:00 PM 42.7 °F 22 °F 44 %SE 0 mph 2 mph 30.2 in 0 in 0 in
7:30 PM 41.5 °F 22 °F 46 %SE 0 mph 3 mph 30.21 in 0 in 0 in
8:00 PM 41.9 °F 22 °F 45 %South 1 mph 4 mph 30.22 in 0 in 0 in
8:30 PM 41.8 °F 22 °F 45 %SSE 0 mph 3 mph 30.21 in 0 in 0 in
9:00 PM 41.1 °F 22 °F 46 %SSW 0 mph 3 mph 30.2 in 0 in 0 in
9:30 PM 41.1 °F 22 °F 47 %SE 2 mph 3 mph 30.21 in 0 in 0 in
10:00 PM 40.5 °F 23 °F 49 %South 1 mph 4 mph 30.21 in 0 in 0 in
10:30 PM 38.9 °F 24 °F 55 %SE 1 mph 3 mph 30.21 in 0 in 0 in
11:00 PM 37.1 °F 24 °F 60 %SE 0 mph 2 mph 30.21 in 0 in 0 in
11:30 PM 35.2 °F 24 °F 64 %SE 0 mph 1 mph 30.2 in 0 in 0 in
2/8/2019 COG Municipal Operations Center (MOC) Weather | Personal Weather Station: KNCGASTO28 by Wunderground.com | Weather Undergr…
https://www.wunderground.com/personal-weather-station/dashboard?ID=KNCGASTO28#history/tdata/s20190121/e20190128/mweek 13/16
Jan 20 Temperature Dew Point Humidity Wind Speed Gust Pressure Precip. Rate.Precip. Accum.
12:00 AM 34.4 °F 24 °F 67 %SSE 0 mph 2 mph 30.2 in 0 in 0 in
12:30 AM 33.5 °F 25 °F 70 %SW 0 mph 2 mph 30.2 in 0 in 0 in
Jan 27 Temperature Dew Point Humidity Wind Speed Gust Pressure Precip. Rate.Precip. Accum.
1:00 AM 32.2 °F 24 °F 73 %SW 0 mph 0 mph 30.2 in 0 in 0 in
1:30 AM 31 °F 24 °F 75 %SW 0 mph 0 mph 30.2 in 0 in 0 in
2:00 AM 30 °F 24 °F 79 %SW 0 mph 0 mph 30.19 in 0 in 0 in
2:30 AM 29 °F 25 °F 83 %SW 0 mph 0 mph 30.19 in 0 in 0 in
3:00 AM 28.1 °F 25 °F 86 %SW 1 mph 1 mph 30.18 in 0 in 0 in
3:30 AM 28.4 °F 25 °F 85 %SW 0 mph 0 mph 30.19 in 0 in 0 in
4:00 AM 27.6 °F 24 °F 87 %SW 0 mph 0 mph 30.18 in 0 in 0 in
4:30 AM 27.1 °F 24 °F 88 %SW 0 mph 0 mph 30.17 in 0 in 0 in
5:00 AM 26.6 °F 24 °F 90 %SW 0 mph 0 mph 30.16 in 0 in 0 in
5:30 AM 26.3 °F 24 °F 91 %SE 0 mph 1 mph 30.16 in 0 in 0 in
6:00 AM 26.3 °F 24 °F 92 %SE 0 mph 0 mph 30.18 in 0 in 0 in
6:30 AM 24.8 °F 23 °F 93 %SE 0 mph 0 mph 30.18 in 0 in 0 in
7:00 AM 24.2 °F 23 °F 95 %SE 0 mph 0 mph 30.18 in 0 in 0 in
7:30 AM 24.3 °F 23 °F 95 %SE 0 mph 0 mph 30.18 in 0 in 0 in
8:00 AM 25.3 °F 24 °F 96 %SE 0 mph 0 mph 30.18 in 0 in 0 in
8:30 AM 30.5 °F 29 °F 94 %SE 0 mph 0 mph 30.18 in 0 in 0 in
9:00 AM 32.5 °F 29 °F 87 %SE 1 mph 1 mph 30.17 in 0 in 0 in
9:30 AM 34.1 °F 29 °F 82 %NNE 2 mph 2 mph 30.18 in 0 in 0 in
10:00 AM 36.3 °F 29 °F 74 %NNE 2 mph 3 mph 30.2 in 0 in 0 in
10:30 AM 38.9 °F 28 °F 66 %WNW 0 mph 2 mph 30.2 in 0 in 0 in
11:00 AM 41.3 °F 29 °F 62 %NNE 0 mph 1 mph 30.17 in 0 in 0 in
11:30 AM 44.8 °F 29 °F 55 %North 0 mph 2 mph 30.16 in 0 in 0 in
12:00 PM 48.2 °F 29 °F 48 %North 2 mph 4 mph 30.13 in 0 in 0 in
12:30 PM 50.5 °F 29 °F 44 %ENE 0 mph 1 mph 30.12 in 0 in 0 in
1:00 PM 51.2 °F 30 °F 44 %SE 1 mph 2 mph 30.11 in 0 in 0 in
1:30 PM 52.2 °F 30 °F 42 %South 0 mph 2 mph 30.11 in 0 in 0 in
2:00 PM 51.6 °F 29 °F 42 %SE 1 mph 3 mph 30.09 in 0 in 0 in
2:30 PM 52.4 °F 29 °F 40 %SSW 1 mph 2 mph 30.07 in 0 in 0 in
2/8/2019 COG Municipal Operations Center (MOC) Weather | Personal Weather Station: KNCGASTO28 by Wunderground.com | Weather Undergr…
https://www.wunderground.com/personal-weather-station/dashboard?ID=KNCGASTO28#history/tdata/s20190121/e20190128/mweek 14/16
Jan 20 Temperature Dew Point Humidity Wind Speed Gust Pressure Precip. Rate.Precip. Accum.
3:00 PM 52.4 °F 29 °F 41 %South 0 mph 3 mph 30.07 in 0 in 0 in
3:30 PM 52.4 °F 29 °F 40 %SW 0 mph 2 mph 30.07 in 0 in 0 in
4:00 PM 51.6 °F 28 °F 41 %SW 0 mph 1 mph 30.06 in 0 in 0 in
4:30 PM 50.9 °F 29 °F 43 %SSE 0 mph 1 mph 30.05 in 0 in 0 in
5:00 PM 49.9 °F 29 °F 45 %SSE 0 mph 1 mph 30.05 in 0 in 0 in
5:30 PM 48.4 °F 30 °F 50 %SSE 0 mph 0 mph 30.05 in 0 in 0 in
6:00 PM 47 °F 30 °F 52 %SSE 0 mph 0 mph 30.07 in 0 in 0 in
6:30 PM 45.7 °F 29 °F 53 %SSE 0 mph 1 mph 30.07 in 0 in 0 in
7:00 PM 45.7 °F 30 °F 54 %SSE 0 mph 0 mph 30.07 in 0 in 0 in
7:30 PM 44.4 °F 29 °F 56 %SSE 0 mph 0 mph 30.06 in 0 in 0 in
8:00 PM 44.1 °F 30 °F 59 %SSE 0 mph 0 mph 30.06 in 0 in 0 in
8:30 PM 42.5 °F 32 °F 67 %SSE 0 mph 0 mph 30.05 in 0 in 0 in
9:00 PM 41.9 °F 32 °F 68 %SSE 0 mph 0 mph 30.06 in 0 in 0 in
9:30 PM 40.9 °F 33 °F 74 %SSE 0 mph 0 mph 30.05 in 0 in 0 in
10:00 PM 40.2 °F 33 °F 76 %SSE 0 mph 0 mph 30.04 in 0 in 0 in
10:30 PM 39.6 °F 34 °F 80 %NE 0 mph 2 mph 30.04 in 0 in 0 in
11:00 PM 38.7 °F 33 °F 79 %North 1 mph 3 mph 30.05 in 0 in 0 in
11:30 PM 39.3 °F 32 °F 76 %NNE 1 mph 2 mph 30.04 in 0 in 0 in
12:00 AM 39 °F 32 °F 76 %NNE 0 mph 0 mph 30.03 in 0 in 0 in
12:30 AM 38.4 °F 32 °F 78 %NNE 0 mph 0 mph 30.03 in 0 in 0 in
Jan 28 Temperature Dew Point Humidity Wind Speed Gust Pressure Precip. Rate.Precip. Accum.
1:00 AM 38 °F 32 °F 78 %NNE 0 mph 0 mph 30.03 in 0 in 0 in
1:30 AM 37.4 °F 33 °F 83 %NNE 0 mph 0 mph 30.03 in 0 in 0 in
2:00 AM 37.1 °F 32 °F 83 %NNE 0 mph 0 mph 30.02 in 0 in 0 in
2:30 AM 35.9 °F 32 °F 86 %NNE 0 mph 0 mph 30.02 in 0 in 0 in
3:00 AM 35.5 °F 33 °F 89 %NNE 0 mph 0 mph 30.01 in 0 in 0 in
3:30 AM 35.6 °F 33 °F 89 %NNE 0 mph 1 mph 30 in 0 in 0 in
4:00 AM 35.5 °F 33 °F 89 %NNE 0 mph 0 mph 30.01 in 0 in 0 in
4:30 AM 36.2 °F 32 °F 85 %NNE 0 mph 1 mph 30 in 0 in 0 in
5:00 AM 35.9 °F 32 °F 86 %North 0 mph 1 mph 30 in 0 in 0 in
5:30 AM 35.5 °F 32 °F 86 %NE 0 mph 1 mph 29.99 in 0 in 0 in
2/8/2019 COG Municipal Operations Center (MOC) Weather | Personal Weather Station: KNCGASTO28 by Wunderground.com | Weather Undergr…
https://www.wunderground.com/personal-weather-station/dashboard?ID=KNCGASTO28#history/tdata/s20190121/e20190128/mweek 15/16
Jan 20 Temperature Dew Point Humidity Wind Speed Gust Pressure Precip. Rate.Precip. Accum.
6:00 AM 35.2 °F 31 °F 86 %North 0 mph 1 mph 29.99 in 0 in 0 in
6:30 AM 32.7 °F 30 °F 90 %North 0 mph 0 mph 30 in 0 in 0 in
7:00 AM 32 °F 30 °F 92 %North 0 mph 0 mph 30.01 in 0 in 0 in
7:45 AM 31.2 °F 30 °F 95 %North 0 mph 0 mph 30.06 in 0 in 0 in
8:15 AM 32.5 °F 31 °F 93 %North 0 mph 0 mph 30.06 in 0 in 0 in
8:45 AM 39.2 °F 34 °F 82 %North 0 mph 0 mph 30.07 in 0 in 0 in
9:15 AM 42.4 °F 35 °F 74 %East 2 mph 2 mph 30.08 in 0 in 0 in
9:45 AM 44.8 °F 34 °F 65 %SSE 3 mph 7 mph 30.08 in 0 in 0 in
10:15 AM 46.9 °F 33 °F 58 %East 2 mph 7 mph 30.08 in 0 in 0 in
10:45 AM 48.3 °F 33 °F 57 %WNW 0 mph 6 mph 30.07 in 0 in 0 in
11:15 AM 50.1 °F 32 °F 51 %ESE 1 mph 7 mph 30.07 in 0 in 0 in
11:45 AM 52.4 °F 32 °F 47 %ESE 1 mph 6 mph 30.06 in 0 in 0 in
12:15 PM 52.5 °F 33 °F 47 %West 1 mph 6 mph 30.04 in 0 in 0 in
12:45 PM 54.1 °F 32 °F 44 %SE 2 mph 8 mph 30.01 in 0 in 0 in
1:15 PM 54.9 °F 32 °F 42 %SW 7 mph 11 mph 30 in 0 in 0 in
1:45 PM 55 °F 32 °F 42 %SE 3 mph 10 mph 29.98 in 0 in 0 in
2:15 PM 55.8 °F 32 °F 41 %SE 4 mph 8 mph 29.96 in 0 in 0 in
2:45 PM 57 °F 32 °F 39 %SW 8 mph 10 mph 29.95 in 0 in 0 in
3:15 PM 57.2 °F 32 °F 38 %South 6 mph 7 mph 29.95 in 0 in 0 in
3:45 PM 56.5 °F 32 °F 40 %East 5 mph 10 mph 29.94 in 0 in 0 in
4:15 PM 55.8 °F 32 °F 40 %SSW 3 mph 9 mph 29.94 in 0 in 0 in
4:45 PM 54.6 °F 32 °F 42 %SSW 2 mph 12 mph 29.93 in 0 in 0 in
5:15 PM 53.6 °F 32 °F 44 %South 0 mph 10 mph 29.93 in 0 in 0 in
5:45 PM 52 °F 32 °F 47 %SE 0 mph 6 mph 29.94 in 0 in 0 in
6:15 PM 50.3 °F 32 °F 50 %South 0 mph 3 mph 29.93 in 0 in 0 in
6:45 PM 48.4 °F 32 °F 53 %SSW 0 mph 2 mph 29.95 in 0 in 0 in
7:15 PM 47.5 °F 32 °F 55 %South 0 mph 2 mph 29.95 in 0 in 0 in
7:45 PM 47.1 °F 32 °F 56 %South 1 mph 3 mph 29.96 in 0 in 0 in
8:15 PM 46.1 °F 32 °F 59 %SSE 1 mph 4 mph 29.96 in 0 in 0 in
8:45 PM 45.9 °F 32 °F 59 %SSE 1 mph 4 mph 29.97 in 0 in 0 in
9:15 PM 45.1 °F 33 °F 62 %South 1 mph 4 mph 29.98 in 0 in 0 in
2/8/2019 COG Municipal Operations Center (MOC) Weather | Personal Weather Station: KNCGASTO28 by Wunderground.com | Weather Undergr…
https://www.wunderground.com/personal-weather-station/dashboard?ID=KNCGASTO28#history/tdata/s20190121/e20190128/mweek 16/16
Please note that DISQUS operates this forum. When you sign in to comment, your sign in information, along with your comments, will be governed
by DISQUS' privacy policy. By commenting, you are accepting the DISQUS terms of service.
The comments made below do not necessarily represent the views of Weather Underground; The Weather Company, an IBM Business; or IBM.
Comments below should not be perceived as official forecasts or emergency information. For official information on potential storm impacts and
evacuation information, please follow guidance from your local authority's emergency operations department.
Comments for KNCGASTO28
0 Comments Weather Underground Login1
t Tweet f Share Sort by Newest
LOG IN WITH OR SIGN UP WITH DISQUS
Name
Start the discussion…
?
Be the first to comment.
Subscribe✉Add Disqus to your siteAdd DisqusAddd Disqus' Privacy PolicyPrivacy PolicyPrivacy🔒
Recommend
Jan 20 Temperature Dew Point Humidity Wind Speed Gust Pressure Precip. Rate.Precip. Accum.
9:45 PM 45.1 °F 33 °F 63 %SSE 0 mph 3 mph 29.98 in 0 in 0 in
10:15 PM 46.2 °F 34 °F 63 %SE 1 mph 3 mph 29.98 in 0 in 0 in
10:45 PM 46.9 °F 34 °F 61 %South 2 mph 5 mph 29.97 in 0 in 0 in
11:15 PM 47.2 °F 34 °F 61 %South 3 mph 4 mph 29.96 in 0 in 0 in
11:45 PM 47.3 °F 34 °F 61 %SE 2 mph 4 mph 29.95 in 0 in 0 in
page-
APPENDIX B: AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHS
Project No.
Key: Subject Property
Aerial Photograph Year: 1950
500 1000 2000
5375609 8 3
page-
APPENDIX B: AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHS
Project No.
Key: Subject Property
Aerial Photograph Year: 1956
500 1000 2000
5375609 8 4
page-
APPENDIX B: AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHS
Project No.
Key: Subject Property
Aerial Photograph Year: 1961
500 1000 2000
5375609 8 5
page-
APPENDIX B: AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHS
Project No.
Key: Subject Property
Aerial Photograph Year: 1964
500 1000 2000
5375609 8 6
page-
APPENDIX B: AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHS
Project No.
Key: Subject Property
Aerial Photograph Year: 1976
500 1000 2000
5375609 8 7
page-
APPENDIX B: AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHS
Project No.
Key: Subject Property
Aerial Photograph Year: 1984
500 1000 2000
5375609 8 8
page-
APPENDIX B: AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHS
Project No.
Key: Subject Property
Aerial Photograph Year: 1993
500 1000 2000
5375609 8 9
page-
APPENDIX B: AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHS
Project No.
Key: Subject Property
Aerial Photograph Year: 2006
500 1000 2000
5375609 8 11
page-
APPENDIX B: AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHS
Project No.
Key: Subject Property
Aerial Photograph Year: 2009
500 1000 2000
5375609 8 12
page-
APPENDIX B: AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHS
Project No.
Key: Subject Property
Aerial Photograph Year: 2012
500 1000 2000
5375609 8 13
page-
APPENDIX B: AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHS
Project No
Key: Subject Property
Aerial Photograph Year: 2016
500 1000 2000
5375609 8 14
-
APPENDIX B: Topographic Maps
Project No.
Key: Subject Property
Topographic Map Year: 1914
TP, Gastonia, 1914, 15-minute
0 Miles 0.25 0.5 1 1.5
5375609 4
-
APPENDIX B: Topographic Maps
Project No.
Key: Subject Property
Topographic Map Year: 1916
TP, Gastonia, 1916, 15-minute
0 Miles 0.25 0.5 1 1.5
5375609 4
-
APPENDIX B: Topographic Maps
Project No.
Key: Subject Property
Topographic Map Year: 1970
TP, Gastonia North, 1970, 7.5-minute
0 Miles 0.25 0.5 1 1.5
5375609 4
-
APPENDIX B: Topographic Maps
Project No.
Key: Subject Property
Topographic Map Year: 1996
TP, Gastonia North, 1996, 7.5-minute
W, Bessemer City, 1996, 7.5-minute
0 Miles 0.25 0.5 1 1.5
5375609 4
-
APPENDIX B: Topographic Maps
Project No.
Key: Subject Property
Topographic Map Year: 2003
TP, Gastonia North, 2003, 7.5-minute
0 Miles 0.25 0.5 1 1.5
5375609 4
-
APPENDIX B: Topographic Maps
Project No.
Key: Subject Property
Topographic Map Year: 2013
TP, Gastonia North, 2013, 7.5-minute
W, Bessemer City, 2013, 7.5-minute
0 Miles 0.25 0.5 1 1.5
5375609 4
Soil Map—Gaston County, North Carolina
Natural Resources
Conservation Service
Web Soil Survey
National Cooperative Soil Survey
8/15/2018
Page 1 of 339057003905800390590039060003906100390620039063003906400390650039066003905700390580039059003906000390610039062003906300390640039065003906600478900479000479100479200479300479400479500479600479700479800479900480000480100480200480300480400
478900 479000 479100 479200 479300 479400 479500 479600 479700 479800 479900 480000 480100 480200 480300 480400
35° 18' 11'' N 81° 13' 57'' W35° 18' 11'' N81° 12' 54'' W35° 17' 37'' N
81° 13' 57'' W35° 17' 37'' N
81° 12' 54'' WN
Map projection: Web Mercator Corner coordinates: WGS84 Edge tics: UTM Zone 17N WGS84
0 350 700 1400 2100
Feet
0 100 200 400 600
Meters
Map Scale: 1:7,290 if printed on A landscape (11" x 8.5") sheet.
Soil Map may not be valid at this scale.
MAP LEGEND MAP INFORMATION
Area of Interest (AOI)
Area of Interest (AOI)
Soils
Soil Map Unit Polygons
Soil Map Unit Lines
Soil Map Unit Points
Special Point Features
Blowout
Borrow Pit
Clay Spot
Closed Depression
Gravel Pit
Gravelly Spot
Landfill
Lava Flow
Marsh or swamp
Mine or Quarry
Miscellaneous Water
Perennial Water
Rock Outcrop
Saline Spot
Sandy Spot
Severely Eroded Spot
Sinkhole
Slide or Slip
Sodic Spot
Spoil Area
Stony Spot
Very Stony Spot
Wet Spot
Other
Special Line Features
Water Features
Streams and Canals
Transportation
Rails
Interstate Highways
US Routes
Major Roads
Local Roads
Background
Aerial Photography
The soil surveys that comprise your AOI were mapped at
1:24,000.
Warning: Soil Map may not be valid at this scale.
Enlargement of maps beyond the scale of mapping can cause
misunderstanding of the detail of mapping and accuracy of soil
line placement. The maps do not show the small areas of
contrasting soils that could have been shown at a more detailed
scale.
Please rely on the bar scale on each map sheet for map
measurements.
Source of Map: Natural Resources Conservation Service
Web Soil Survey URL:
Coordinate System: Web Mercator (EPSG:3857)
Maps from the Web Soil Survey are based on the Web Mercator
projection, which preserves direction and shape but distorts
distance and area. A projection that preserves area, such as the
Albers equal-area conic projection, should be used if more
accurate calculations of distance or area are required.
This product is generated from the USDA-NRCS certified data as
of the version date(s) listed below.
Soil Survey Area: Gaston County, North Carolina
Survey Area Data: Version 17, Sep 26, 2017
Soil map units are labeled (as space allows) for map scales
1:50,000 or larger.
Date(s) aerial images were photographed: Apr 23, 2014—Nov
28, 2017
The orthophoto or other base map on which the soil lines were
compiled and digitized probably differs from the background
imagery displayed on these maps. As a result, some minor
shifting of map unit boundaries may be evident.
Soil Map—Gaston County, North Carolina
Natural Resources
Conservation Service
Web Soil Survey
National Cooperative Soil Survey
8/15/2018
Page 2 of 3
Map Unit Legend
Map Unit Symbol Map Unit Name Acres in AOI Percent of AOI
CeB2 Cecil sandy clay loam, 2 to 8
percent slopes, moderately
eroded
18.2 16.9%
CeD2 Cecil sandy clay loam, 8 to 15
percent slopes, moderately
eroded
37.7 35.2%
ChA Chewacla loam, 0 to 2 percent
slopes, frequently flooded
23.3 21.7%
MaB2 Madison sandy clay loam, 2 to
8 percent slopes, moderately
eroded
3.7 3.5%
MaD2 Madison sandy clay loam, 8 to
15 percent slopes,
moderately eroded
2.4 2.3%
MaE Madison sandy loam, 15 to 25
percent slopes
2.9 2.7%
PaE Pacolet sandy loam, 15 to 25
percent slopes
15.6 14.5%
VaB Vance sandy loam, 2 to 8
percent slopes
3.4 3.2%
Totals for Area of Interest 107.2 100.0%
Soil Map—Gaston County, North Carolina
Natural Resources
Conservation Service
Web Soil Survey
National Cooperative Soil Survey
8/15/2018
Page 3 of 3
8/15/2018 Official Series Description - CECIL Series
https://soilseries.sc.egov.usda.gov/OSD_Docs/C/CECIL.html 1/3
LOCATION CECIL NC+AL GA SC VA
Established Series Rev. DTA, RHB 02/2007
CECIL SERIES

The Cecil series consists of very deep, well drained moderately permeable soils on ridges and side slopes of the
Piedmont uplands. They are deep to saprolite and very deep to bedrock. They formed in residuum weathered
from felsic, igneous and high-grade metamorphic rocks of the Piedmont uplands. Slopes range from 0 to 25
percent. Mean annual precipitation is 48 inches and mean annual temperature is 59 degrees F. near the type
location.
TAXONOMIC CLASS: Fine, kaolinitic, thermic Typic Kanhapludults
TYPICAL PEDON: Cecil sandy loam--forested. (Colors are for moist soil unless otherwise stated.)
Ap--0 to 8 inches; dark yellowish brown (10YR 4/4) sandy loam; weak medium granular structure; very friable;
slightly acid; abrupt smooth boundary. (2 to 8 inches thick)
Bt1--8 to 26 inches; red (10R 4/8) clay; moderate medium subangular blocky structure; firm; sticky, plastic;
common clay films on faces of peds; few fine flakes of mica; strongly acid; gradual wavy boundary.
Bt2--26 to 42 inches; red (10R 4/8) clay; few fine prominent yellowish red (5YR 5/8) mottles; moderate medium
subangular blocky structure; firm; sticky, plastic; common clay films on faces of peds; few fine flakes of mica;
very strongly acid; gradual wavy boundary. (Combined thickness of the Bt horizon is 24 to 50 inches)
BC--42 to 50 inches; red (2.5YR 4/8) clay loam; few distinct yellowish red (5YR 5/8) mottles; weak medium
subangular blocky structure; friable; few fine flakes of mica; very strongly acid; gradual wavy boundary. (0 to 10
inches thick)
C--50 to 80 inches; red (2.5YR 4/8) loam saprolite; common medium distinct pale yellow (2.5Y 7/4) and
common distinct brown (7.5YR 5/4) mottles; massive; very friable; few fine flakes of mica; very strongly acid.
TYPE LOCATION: Franklin County, North Carolina; about 9.7 miles west of Louisburg on North Carolina
Highway 56 to Franklinton, about 4.4 miles south on U.S. Highway 1, about 0.4 mile east on North Carolina
Highway 96, about 500 feet north of the road, in a field; Franklinton USGS topographic quadrangle; lat. 36
degrees 02 minutes 24 seconds N. and long. 78 degrees 29 minutes 27 seconds W.
RANGE IN CHARACTERISTICS: The Bt horizon is at least 24 to 50 inches thick and extends to 40 inches or
more. Depth to bedrock ranges from 6 to 10 feet or more. The soil ranges from very strongly acid to moderately
acid in the A horizons and is strongly acid or very strongly acid in the B and C horizons. Limed soils are
typically moderately acid or slightly acid in the upper part. Content of coarse fragments range from 0 to 35
percent by volume in the A horizon and 0 to 10 percent by volume in the Bt horizon. Fragments are dominantly
gravel or cobble in size. Most pedons have few to common flakes of mica in the Bt horizon and few to many
flakes of mica in the BC and C horizons.
The A or Ap horizon has hue of 2.5YR to 10YR, value of 3 to 5, and chroma of 2 to 8. A horizons with value of
3 are less than 6 inches thick. The texture is sandy loam, fine sandy loam, or loam in the fine earth fraction.
Eroded phases are sandy clay loam, or clay loam in the fine earth fraction.
8/15/2018 Official Series Description - CECIL Series
https://soilseries.sc.egov.usda.gov/OSD_Docs/C/CECIL.html 2/3
The E horizon, where present, has hue of 7.5YR or 10YR, value of 4 to 6, and chroma of 3 to 8. It is sandy loam,
fine sandy loam, or loam in the fine-earth fraction.
The BA or BE horizon, where present, has hue of 2.5YR to 10YR, value of 4 to 6, and chroma of 3 to 8. It is
sandy clay loam, loam, or clay loam.
The Bt horizon averages 35 to 60 percent clay in the control section but may range to 70 percent in some
subhorizons. It has hue of 10R or 2.5YR, value of 4 or 5, and chroma of 6 or 8. Hue also ranges to 5YR if
evident patterns of mottling are lacking in the Bt and BC horizons. Mottles that are few and random are included.
The Bt horizon is clay loam, clay, or sandy clay and contains less than 30 percent silt.
The BC horizon has hue of 10R to 5YR, value of 4 or 6, and chroma of 4 to 8. Mottles in shades of yellow or
brown are few to common in some pedons. The texture is sandy clay loam, clay loam, or loam.
The C horizon is similar in color to the BC horizon or it is variegated. It is loamy saprolite weathered from felsic,
igneous and high-grade metamorphic rocks.
COMPETING SERIES: These are the Appling, Bethlehem, Georgeville, Herndon, Madison, Nanford, Nankin,
Pacolet, Saw, Tarrus, and Wedowee series in the same family. Those in closely related families are the Cataula,
Chestatee, Cullen, Hulett, Lloyd, Mayodan, and Mecklenburg series. Appling soils have dominant hue of 7.5YR
or yellower or where hue is 5YR it has evident patterns of mottling in a subhorizon of the Bt or BC horizon.
Bethlehem soils have soft bedrock at depths of 20 to 40 inches. Cataula soils have a perched water table at 2 to 4
feet, Chestatee soils contain more than 15 percent, by volume, coarse fragments throughout. Cullen soils have
more clay in the Bt horizon. Mayodan and Mecklenburg soils have mixed mineralogy and in addition, Mayodan
soils formed in Triassic age sediments and Mecklenburg soils formed from basic diabase parent material.
Georgeville, Herndon, Nanford, and Tarrus soils formed in Carolina slate and contain more than 30 percent silt.
Hulett, Nankin, and Wedowee soils have a Bt horizon with hue of 5YR or yellower. In addition, Nankin soils
formed from marine sediments. Lloyd soils have rhodic colors to depths of 40 inches or more. Madison, Pacolet,
and Wedowee soils have thinner argillic horizons. Saw soils have hard bedrock at depths of 20 to 40 inches.
GEOGRAPHIC SETTING: Cecil soils are on nearly level to steep Piedmont uplands. Slope gradients are 0 to
25 percent, most commonly between 2 and 15 percent. These soils have developed in weathered felsic igneous
and high-grade metamorphic rocks. Average annual precipitation is about 48 inches. Mean annual soil
temperature is about 59 degrees F.
GEOGRAPHICALLY ASSOCIATED SOILS: In addition to the competing Appling, Bethlehem, Cataula,
Chestatee, Cullen, Lloyd, Madison, Mecklenburg, Pacolet, Saw, and Wedowee series these are the Durham,
Louisburg, Rion, and Worsham series. Durham, Louisburg, and Rion soils have less clay in the Bt horizon.
Worsham soils are poorly drained and are around the heads of drains.
DRAINAGE AND PERMEABILITY: Well drained; medium to rapid runoff; moderate permeability.
USE AND VEGETATION: About half of the total acreage is in cultivation, with the remainder in pasture and forest. Common crops are small grains, corn, cotton, and tobacco.
DISTRIBUTION AND EXTENT: The Piedmont of Alabama, Georgia, North Carolina, South Carolina, and Virginia. The series is of large extent, with an area of more than 10 million acres.
MLRA SOIL SURVEY REGIONAL OFFICE (MO) RESPONSIBLE: Raleigh, North Carolina
SERIES ESTABLISHED: Cecil County, Maryland; 1899.
REMARKS: The June 1988 revision changed the classification to Typic Kanhapludults and recognized the low
activity clay properties of this soil as defined in the Low Activity Clay Amendment to Soil Taxonomy, August
8/15/2018 Official Series Description - CECIL Series
https://soilseries.sc.egov.usda.gov/OSD_Docs/C/CECIL.html 3/3
1986. The December 2005 revision changed the type location from Catawba County, North Carolina to a more
representative location. The May 2006 revision changed language in competing series for Wedowee.
Diagnostic horizons and features recognized in this pedon are: Ochric epipedon--the zone from the surface of the soil to a depth of 8 inches (Ap horizon) Kandic horizon--the zone between 8 and 42 inches meets the low activity clay requirement in more than 50 percent of the horizon (Bt1 and Bt2 horizons) Argillic horizon--the zone between 8 and 42 inches (Bt1 and Bt2 horizons)
ADDITIONAL DATA: McCracken, R. J., editor: Southern Cooperative Series Bulletin 61, issued January,
1959, Virginia Agricultural Experiment Station, Blacksburg, Virginia. Soil Survey of Catawba County, North
Carolina, issued 1975. Soil Survey of Forsyth County, North Carolina, issued 1976.
MLRA--136
REVISED--09/1997, RLV; 12/2005, DTA; 05/2006, RHB
TABULAR SERIES DATA:
SOI-5 Soil Name Slope Airtemp FrFr/Seas Precip Elevation
NC0018 CECIL 0-25 57-65 175-200 45-55 200-900
NC0268 CECIL 0-25 57-65 160-190 44-55 300-800

SOI-5 FloodL FloodH Watertable Kind Months Bedrock Hardness
NC0018 NONE >6.0 - - >60
NC0268 NONE >6.0 - - >60

SOI-5 Depth Texture 3-Inch No-10 Clay% -CEC-
NC0018 0-8 SL FSL L 0-5 80-100 5-20 1-5
NC0018 0-8 GR-SL GR-L GR-FSL 5-15 55-85 5-20 1-5
NC0018 0-8 SCL CL 0-5 75-100 20-35 5-10
NC0018 8-50 C CL 0-5 92-100 35-70 3-12
NC0018 50-80 VAR - - - -

NC0268 0-8 GR-SCL GR-CL 0-10 60-85 20-35 5-10
NC0268 8-50 C CL 0-5 90-100 35-70 3-12
NC0268 50-80 VAR - - - -

SOI-5 Depth -pH- O.M. Salin Permeab Shnk-Swll
NC0018 0-8 4.5-6.5 0.5-1.0 0-0 2.0-6.0 LOW
NC0018 0-8 4.5-6.5 0.5-1.0 0-0 2.0-6.0 LOW
NC0018 0-8 4.5-6.5 0.5-1.0 0-0 0.6-2.0 LOW
NC0018 8-50 4.5-5.5 0.0-0.5 0-0 0.6-2.0 LOW
NC0018 50-80 - - - - -

NC0268 0-8 4.5-6.0 0.5-1.0 0-0 0.6-2.0 LOW
NC0268 8-50 4.5-5.5 0.0-0.5 0-0 0.6-2.0 LOW
NC0268 50-80 - - - - -

National Cooperative Soil Survey U.S.A.
8/15/2018 Official Series Description - CHEWACLA Series
https://soilseries.sc.egov.usda.gov/OSD_Docs/C/CHEWACLA.html 1/5
LOCATION CHEWACLA NC+AL GA SC TN VA
Established Series RJL/Rev. JAK/DTA 02/2010
CHEWACLA SERIES

MLRA(s): 136-Southern Piedmont, 133A-Southern Coastal Plain, 153A-Atlantic Coast Flatwoods MLRA SOIL SURVEY REGIONAL OFFICE (MO) RESPONSIBLE: Raleigh, North Carolina Depth Class: Very deep Drainage Class (Agricultural): Somewhat poorly drained Internal Free Water Occurrence: Very shallow to moderately deep, common Flooding Frequency and Duration: Frequent to rare for very brief to long periods Ponding Frequency and Duration: None Index Surface Runoff: Negligible to low Permeability: Moderate Landscape: Piedmont and Coastal Plain river valleys Landform: Flood plains Parent Material: Alluvium Slope: 0 to 2 percent Elevation (type location): Unknown Mean Annual Air Temperature (type location): 59 degrees F. Mean Annual Precipitation (type location): 44 inches
TAXONOMIC CLASS: Fine-loamy, mixed, active, thermic Fluvaquentic Dystrudepts
TYPICAL PEDON: Chewacla loam--cultivated. (Colors are for moist soil unless otherwise stated.)
Ap--0 to 4 inches; brown (7.5YR 4/4) loam; weak medium granular structure; friable; common very fine, fine,
and medium roots; few fine flakes of mica; very strongly acid; clear smooth boundary. (1 to 10 inches thick)
Bw1--4 to 14 inches; dark yellowish brown (10YR 4/4) silty clay loam; weak medium subangular blocky
structure; friable; common fine and medium roots; common fine flakes of mica; few medium faint brown (10YR
5/3) iron depletions; very strongly acid; gradual wavy boundary.
Bw2--14 to 26 inches; dark yellowish brown (10YR 4/4) clay loam; weak medium subangular blocky structure;
friable; common fine and medium roots; many fine flakes of mica; common medium faint grayish brown (10YR
5/2) iron depletions and common medium distinct strong brown (7.5YR 4/6) masses of oxidized iron; very
strongly acid; gradual wavy boundary.
Bw3--26 to 38 inches; brown (7.5YR 4/4) loam; weak medium subangular blocky structure; friable; common
fine roots; many fine flakes of mica; common medium distinct gray (10YR 5/1) iron depletions; very strongly
acid; gradual wavy boundary.
Bw4--38 to 47 inches; strong brown (7.5YR 5/8) clay loam; weak medium subangular blocky structure; friable;
few fine roots; many fine flakes of mica; common medium distinct gray (10YR 5/1) iron depletions; very
strongly acid; gradual wavy boundary.
Bw5--47 to 60 inches; gray (10YR 5/1), strong brown (7.5YR 5/8), and red (2.5YR 5/8) clay loam; weak
medium subangular blocky structure; friable; few fine roots; many fine flakes of mica; areas with gray color are
8/15/2018 Official Series Description - CHEWACLA Series
https://soilseries.sc.egov.usda.gov/OSD_Docs/C/CHEWACLA.html 2/5
iron depletions and areas with red color are masses of oxidized iron; very strongly acid; gradual wavy boundary.
(Combined thickness of the Bw horizons is 6 to 60 inches)
C--60 to 80 inches; brown (7.5YR 4/4) and gray (7.5YR 5/1) loam; massive; friable; many fine flakes of mica;
areas with gray color are iron depletions very strongly acid.
TYPE LOCATION: Halifax County, North Carolina; 1.0 mile east southeast of Norfleet on Secondary Road
1800, 1.3 miles east southeast on a farm path, 1.0 mile south southwest on farm path, 0.5 mile southeast of the
farm path, in a wooded area.
RANGE IN CHARACTERISTICS: Depth to Bedrock: Greater than 80 inches Depth to Seasonal High Water Table: 6 to 24 inches, November to April Rock Fragment content: Less than 5 percent, by volume, in the A and upper B horizons. In some pedons, gravel
content ranges to 15 percent by volume in the lower B horizons. Soil Reaction: Very strongly acid to slightly acid to a depth of 40 inches, very strongly acid to mildly alkaline
below 40 inches, except where limed Other Features: Few to many mica flakes throughout and none to common concretions
RANGE OF INDIVIDUAL HORIZONS: Ap horizon or A horizon: Color--hue of 5YR to 2.5Y, value of 3 to 5, chroma of 1 to 6 Texture (fine-earth fraction)--sandy loam, fine sandy loam, loam, silt loam, silty clay loam or clay loam
Ab horizon (where present): Color--hue of 10YR or 2.5Y, value of 2 to 5, and chroma of 1 or 2 Texture (fine-earth fraction)--sandy loam, fine sandy loam, loam, silt loam, clay loam, sandy clay loam, loamy
fine sand, or loamy sand
AB or BA horizon (where present): Color--hue of 7.5YR to 2.5Y, value of 4 to 7, chroma of 3 to 8 Texture (fine-earth fraction)--loam, silt loam, sandy clay loam, clay loam, or silty clay loam
Bw horizon: Color--hue of 5YR to 2.5Y, value of 4 to 7, chroma of 3 to 8 or variegated in shades of these colors Texture (fine-earth fraction)--sandy clay loam, sandy loam, fine sandy loam, loam, clay loam, silt loam, or silty
clay loam Redoximorphic features (were present)--masses of oxidized in shades of red, yellow, or brown and iron
depletions in shades of brown, yellow, olive, or gray
Bg horizon (where present): Color--hue of 10YR or 2.5Y, value of 4 to 7, and chroma of 1 or 2, or is neutral with value of 4 to 8 Texture (fine-earth fraction)--sandy clay loam, sandy loam, fine sandy loam, loam, clay loam, silt loam, or silty
clay loam Redoximorphic features (where present)-masses of oxidized iron in shades of red, yellow, or brown and iron
depletions in shades of brown, yellow, olive, or gray
BC horizon (where present): Color--hue of 5YR to 2.5Y, value of 4 to 7, chroma of 3 to 8 Texture (fine-earth fraction)--sandy clay loam, sandy loam, fine sandy loam, loam, clay loam, silt loam, or silty
clay loam Redoximorphic features (where present)-- masses of oxidized iron in shades of red, yellow, or brown and iron
depletions in shades of brown, yellow, olive, or gray
8/15/2018 Official Series Description - CHEWACLA Series
https://soilseries.sc.egov.usda.gov/OSD_Docs/C/CHEWACLA.html 3/5
BCg horizon (where present): Color--hue of 10YR or 2.5Y, value of 4 to 7, and chroma of 1 or 2, or is neutral with value of 4 to 8 Texture (fine-earth fraction)--sandy clay loam, sandy loam, fine sandy loam, loam, clay loam, silt loam, or silty
clay loam Redoximorphic features (where present)--masses of oxidized iron in shade of red, yellow, or brown and iron
depletions in shades of brown, yellow, olive, or gray
C horizon or 2C horizon (where present): Color--hue of 5YR to 2.5Y, value of 4 to 7, chroma of 3 to 8 Texture (fine-earth fraction)--sandy clay loam, sandy loam, fine sandy loam, loam, clay loam, silt loam, or silty
clay loam. Below 40 inches, texture is commonly variable, ranging from extremely gravelly sand to clay. Redoximorphic features (if they occur)--masses of oxidized iron in shade of red, yellow, or brown and iron
depletions in shades of brown, yellow, olive, or gray
Cg horizon or 2Cg horizon (where present): Color--hue of 10YR or 2.5Y, value of 4 to 7, and chroma of 1 or 2, or is neutral with value of 4 to 8 Texture (fine-earth fraction)--sandy clay loam, sandy loam, fine sandy loam, loam, clay loam, silt loam or silty
clay loam. Below 40 inches, texture is commonly variable, ranging from extremely gravelly sand to clay. Redoximorphic features (where present)--masses of oxidized iron in shade of red, yellow, or brown and iron
depletions in shades of brown, yellow, olive, or gray
COMPETING SERIES: Oakboro soils--have bedrock at 40 to 60 inches and occur in the Carolina Slate Belt
GEOGRAPHIC SETTING: Landscape: Piedmont and Coastal Plain river valleys that drain out of the Piedmont Landform: Flood plains Parent Material: Alluvium Elevation: 10 to 700 feet Mean Annual Air Temperature: 58 to 68 degrees Mean Annual Precipitation: 37 to 69 inches Frost Free Period: 185 to 250 days
GEOGRAPHICALLY ASSOCIATED SOILS: On flood plains: Bibb soils--are in a coarse-loamy family and are poorly drained Buncombe soils--are sandy and excessively drained Cartecay soils--are in a coarse-loamy family Chastain soils--are in a clayey family and are poorly drained Chenneby soils--are in a fine-silty family Congaree soils--lack a cambic horizon Enoree soils--are in a coarse-loamy family Oakboro soils--have bedrock at 40 to 60 inches and occur in the Carolina Slate Belt Riverview soils--are well drained Shellbluff soils--are well drained and in a fine-silty family Tawcaw soils--are in a clayey family Wehadkee soils--are poorly drained On adjacent stream terraces (all of these soils have an argillic horizon): Altavista soils--are moderatelt well drained Augusta soils--are somewhat poorly drained Dogue soils--are in a clayey family, are moderately well drained, and occur in the Coastal Plain region Dorian soils--are in a clayey family, are moderately well drained, and occur in the Piedmont region Merry Oaks soils--are in a fine-silty family and occur in the Piedmont region
8/15/2018 Official Series Description - CHEWACLA Series
https://soilseries.sc.egov.usda.gov/OSD_Docs/C/CHEWACLA.html 4/5
Moncure soils--are in a fine-silty family, are poorly drained, and occur in the Piedmont region Roanoke soils--are in a clayey family and are poorly drained State soils--are well drained Wahee soils--are in a clayey family and occur in the Coastal Plain region Warne soils--are in a clayey family and occur in the Piedmont region Wickham soils--are well drained
DRAINAGE AND PERMEABILITY: Drainage class (Agricultural): Somewhat poorly drained Index Surface Runoff: Negligible to very low Internal Free Water Occurrence: Very shallow to moderately deep, common Flooding Frequency and Duration: Frequent to rare for very brief to long periods Ponding Frequency and Duration: None Permeability: Moderate
USE AND VEGETATION: Major Uses: Pasture, cropland, some forest Dominant Vegetation: Where cultivated--corn, small grain. Where wooded--yellow poplar, sweetgum, water oak,
eastern cottonwood, green ash, blackgum, red maple, willow oak, and American sycamore. Loblolly pines are in
some areas that are not subject to frequent flooding. Common understory plants include river birch, winged elm,
hackberry, greenbrier, American holly, black willow, sourwood, eastern and hophornbeam.
DISTRIBUTION AND EXTENT: Distribution: Alabama, Florida, Georgia, Mississippi, North Carolina, South Carolina, Tennessee, and Virginia Extent: Large
MLRA SOIL SURVEY REGIONAL OFFICE (MO) RESPONSIBLE: Raleigh, North Carolina
SERIES ESTABLISHED: Hall County, Georgia; 1937.
REMARKS: 4/18/03, DTA. In 2003 version, moved the type location from Burke County, North Carolina to
Halifax County, North Carolina. The former type location is located in the mesic part of MLRA 136. The
05/2006 revision removed MLRA 153B. RIC of Ap revised to allow silty clay loam texture.
Diagnostic horizons and soil characteristics recognized in this pedon are: Ochric epipedon--the zone from 0 to 4 inches (Ap horizon) Cambic horizon--the zone from 4 to 60 inches (Bw horizons) Aquic conditions--the soil has redox depletions and concentrations within the upper 24 inches of the soil, with
periodic saturation and reduction at some time during the year Series control section--the zone from 0 to 60 inches
ADDITIONAL DATA: None
TABULAR SERIES DATA:
SOI-5 Soil Name Slope Airtemp FrFr/Seas Precip Elevation
NC0055 CHEWACLA 0-2 57-70 185-250 37-69 10-700

SOI-5 FloodL FloodH Watertable Kind Months Bedrock Hardness
NC0055 RARE FREQ 0.5-2.0 APPARENT NOV-APR >80

SOI-5 Depth Texture 3-Inch No-10 Clay% -CEC-
NC0055 0-4 FSL SL 0-0 95-100 5-20 4-20
NC0055 0-4 SIL L CL 0-0 95-100 10-35 5-30
8/15/2018 Official Series Description - CHEWACLA Series
https://soilseries.sc.egov.usda.gov/OSD_Docs/C/CHEWACLA.html 5/5
NC0055 4-26 SIL SICL CL 0-0 95-100 18-35 10-25
NC0055 26-38 SCL L SL 0-0 95-100 18-35 10-25
NC0055 38-60 SIL CL SICL 0-0 75-100 18-35 10-25
NC0055 60-72 VAR - - - -

SOI-5 Depth -pH- O.M. Salin Permeab Shnk-Swll
NC0055 0-4 4.5-6.5 1.0-4.0 0-0 0.6-2.0 LOW
NC0055 0-4 4.5-6.5 1.0-4.0 0-0 0.6-2.0 LOW
NC0055 4-26 4.5-6.5 0.5-2.0 0-0 0.6-2.0 LOW
NC0055 26-38 4.5-6.5 0.5-2.0 0-0 0.6-2.0 LOW
NC0055 38-60 4.5-7.8 0.5-2.0 0-0 0.6-2.0 LOW
NC0055 60-72 - - - - -

National Cooperative Soil Survey U.S.A.
8/15/2018 Official Series Description - MADISON Series
https://soilseries.sc.egov.usda.gov/OSD_Docs/M/MADISON.html 1/3
LOCATION MADISON NC+AL GA SC VA
Established Series Rev. RAG/JAK 10/2002
MADISON SERIES

The Madison series consists of well drained, moderately permeable soils that formed in residuum weathered
from felsic or intermediate, high-grade metamorphic or igneous rocks high in mica content. They are very deep
to bedrock and moderately deep to saprolite. They are on gently sloping to steep uplands in the Piedmont. Slopes
are mostly between 4 and 15 percent, but range from 2 to 60 percent. Near the type location, mean annual
temperature is 59 degrees F., and mean annual precipitation is 60 inches.
TAXONOMIC CLASS: Fine, kaolinitic, thermic Typic Kanhapludults
TYPICAL PEDON: Madison gravelly sandy loam. (Colors are for moist soil unless otherwise stated.)
Ap--0 to 6 inches; yellowish brown (10YR 5/4) gravelly sandy loam; moderate, medium and coarse, granular
structure; very friable; many fine and medium roots; few fine flakes of mica; fragments of quartz and schist
about l inch in size, make up about 20 percent of horizon; strongly acid; clear smooth boundary. (2 to 9 inches
thick)
BE--6 to 9 inches; strong brown (7.5YR 5/6) sandy clay loam; weak, medium, subangular blocky structure;
friable; many fine and medium roots; few faint clay films on faces of peds; common medium flakes of mica;
common fragments of quartz and schist; strongly acid; clear wavy boundary. (0 to 5 inches thick)
Bt--9 to 30 inches; red (2.5YR 4/8) clay; moderate, fine subangular blocky structure; friable; sticky; slightly
plastic; few fine and medium roots; common fine pores; common distinct clay films on faces of peds; many fine
flakes of mica; common fragments of quartz and schist; strongly acid; gradual wavy boundary. (12 to 30 inches
thick)
BC--30 to 35 inches; yellowish red (5YR 5/8) sandy clay loam; weak, fine and medium subangular blocky
structure; friable; common distinct clay films on faces of peds; many fine flakes of mica; common fragments of
quartz and schist; strongly acid; gradual irregular boundary. (0 to 14 inches thick)
C--35 to 66 inches; yellowish red (5YR 5/8) saprolite of mica schist that is sandy loam; common, medium,
distinct red (2.5YR 5/8) mottles; massive; friable; strongly acid.
TYPE LOCATION: Catawba County, North Carolina; 5 1/4 miles southeast of Newton on N.C. Highway 16,
one-eighth mile south on SR 1810, 2 1/8 miles southeast on SR 1858, 2 miles west on SR 1874 and 500 feet
north of road.
RANGE IN CHARACTERISTICS: Solum thickness ranges from 20 to 50 inches. Depth to bedrock is more
than 6 feet. Content of coarse fragments, mainly gravel, ranges from 0 to 25 percent in the A and E horizons and
is 0 to 15 percent in the lower horizons. Content of mica ranges from few to many in the A, E, BE, and BA
horizons; common or many in the Bt horizon; and many in the BC and C horizons. The soil is moderately acid to
very strongly acid throughout, except where the surface has been limed. Limed soils are moderately acid or
slightly acid in the upper part.
The A or Ap horizon has hue of 2.5YR to 10YR, value of 3 to 5, and chroma of 3 to 8. It is loam, fine sandy
loam, or sandy loam, in the fine-earth fraction. Eroded pedons are sandy clay loam or clay loam in the fine-earth
8/15/2018 Official Series Description - MADISON Series
https://soilseries.sc.egov.usda.gov/OSD_Docs/M/MADISON.html 2/3
fraction.
The E horizon, where present, has hue of 7.5YR to 10YR, value of 3 or 5 and chroma of 3 to 6. It is fine sandy
loam or sandy loam in the fine-earth fraction.
The BA or BE horizons, where present, have hue of 10R to 7.5YR, value of 4 to 6, and chroma of 3 to 8. They
are sandy loam, loam or sandy clay loam.
The Bt horizon commonly has hue of 10R to 5YR, value of 4 to 6, and chroma of 3 to 8. Some pedons have thin
subhorizons of the Bt horizon that range to 5YR and do not have mottles. Texture is clay, sandy clay or clay
loam.
The BC horizon, where present, has hue of 10R to 5YR, value of 4 to 6 and chroma of 3 to 8. In some pedons it
is mottled in shades of red, yellow, or brown. It is sandy loam, loam, sandy clay loam or clay loam.
The C horizon has hue of 10R to 5YR, values of 4 to 6, and chroma of 2 to 8 or is mottled with these colors. In
some pedons it is mottled in shades of red, yellow, or brown. It is saprolite of mica schist, mica gneiss, or other
high-grade metamorphic or igneous rocks that are high in mica content. Textures are sandy loam, loam, or sandy
clay loam. Locally, streaks or veins of soft quartz mica schist may be near the surface giving an irregular lower
boundary to the Bt horizon.
COMPETING SERIES: Soils in the same family are Appling, Bethlehem, Cecil, Nankin, Pacolet, Saw,
Tumbleton, and Wedowee. Appling, Cecil, Nankin, Pacolet, Tumbleton and Wedowee soils lack the many flakes
of mica that produce a characteristic slick feel to Madison soil material. Bethlehem and Saw soils are moderately
deep to bedrock. Nankin and Tumbleton soils are underlain by stratified Coastal Plain marine sediments.
GEOGRAPHIC SETTING: Madison soils are on gently sloping to steep Piedmont uplands. Slopes range from
2 to 60 percent, but are mostly between 4 and 15 percent. The soils formed in residuum weathered from felsic or
intermediate, high-grade metamorphic or igneous rocks high in content of mica. The mean annual air
temperature ranges from 58 to 65 degrees F., and the mean annual precipitation ranges from about 40 to 65
inches.
GEOGRAPHICALLY ASSOCIATED SOILS: These are the competing Appling, Bethlehem, Cecil, Pacolet,
Saw, and Wedowee soils; and the Grover, Helena and Hulett series. Appling, Bethlehem, Cecil, Pacolet, Saw,
and Wedowee soils are on similar landscape positions underlain by felsic, metamorphic or igneous rocks that are
lower in mica content than the rocks from which Madison forms. The moderately well drained Helena soils have
mixed mineralogy and are on toe slopes, at the heads of drains, and along small drainageways. Grover soils are
fine-loamy and are typically on side slopes. Hulett soils have Bt horizons with hue of 5YR and yellower, and are
on similar landscape positions as Madison.
DRAINAGE AND PERMEABILITY: Well drained; runoff is medium to rapid; permeability is moderate.
USE AND VEGETATION: About half the total acreage is cultivated or used for pasture. Principal crops grown
are cotton, corn, wheat, oats, soybeans, peaches, apples, and vegetables. Original forest species include white,
black, post, and red oaks; hickories; dogwood, sourwood; maple and elm. Shortleaf and loblolly pine were
present in places and are now common, along with Virginia pine, in abandoned fields.
DISTRIBUTION AND EXTENT: The Piedmont of Alabama, Georgia, North Carolina, South Carolina, and
Virginia. The series is extensive.
MLRA SOIL SURVEY REGIONAL OFFICE (MO) RESPONSIBLE: Raleigh, North Carolina
SERIES ESTABLISHED: Madison County, Georgia; 1918.
8/15/2018 Official Series Description - MADISON Series
https://soilseries.sc.egov.usda.gov/OSD_Docs/M/MADISON.html 3/3
REMARKS: The June 1988 revision changed the classification to Typic Kanhapludults according to criteria in
the Low Activity Clay Amendment to Soil Taxonomy, August 1986.
Diagnostic horizons and features recognized in this pedon are: Ochric epipedon - the zone from the surface of the soil to a depth of 6 inches. Kandic horizon - the zone from 9 to 35 inches: it meets the low activity clay requirement for Kandic in more than
50 percent of the horizon. Argillic horizon - the zone from 9 to 35 inches.
ADDITIONAL DATA: None
MLRA: 136
TABULAR SERIES DATA:
SOI-5 Soil Name Slope Airtemp FrFr/Seas Precip Elevation
NC0071 MADISON 2- 60 58- 62 190-210 40- 65 700-1200
NC0231 MADISON 2- 60 58- 62 190-210 40- 65 700-1200

SOI-5 FloodL FloodH Watertable Kind Months Bedrock Hardness
NC0071 NONE 6.0-6.0 - 60-60
NC0231 NONE 6.0-6.0 - 60-60

SOI-5 Depth Texture 3-Inch No-10 Clay% -CEC-
NC0071 0- 6 L FSL SL 0- 3 80-100 5-20 1- 4
NC0071 0- 6 GR-FSL GR-SL 3- 10 60- 85 5-15 1- 4
NC0071 0- 6 CL SCL 0- 3 85-100 25-35 3- 6
NC0071 6-30 C CL SC 0- 3 85-100 30-50 3- 6
NC0071 30-35 L SCL CL 0- 3 85-100 25-35 2- 4
NC0071 35-66 FSL SL L 0- 5 80-100 5-20 1- 3
NC0231 0- 6 GR-SCL GR-CL 3- 10 55- 75 20-35 3- 6
NC0231 6-30 C CL SC 0- 3 85-100 30-60 4- 8
NC0231 30-35 L SCL CL 0- 3 85-100 15-35 2- 5
NC0231 35-66 FSL SL L 0- 3 80-100 8-20 1- 3

SOI-5 Depth -pH- O.M. Salin Permeab Shnk-Swll
NC0071 0- 6 4.5- 6.5 .5-2. 0- 0 2.0- 6.0 LOW
NC0071 0- 6 4.5- 6.5 .5-2. 0- 0 6.0- 20 LOW
NC0071 0- 6 4.5- 6.5 .5-2. 0- 0 0.6- 2.0 LOW
NC0071 6-30 4.5- 5.5 0.-.5 0- 0 0.6- 2.0 LOW
NC0071 30-35 4.5- 6.0 0.-.5 0- 0 0.6- 2.0 LOW
NC0071 35-66 4.5- 6.0 0.-.5 0- 0 0.6- 2.0 LOW
NC0231 0- 6 4.5- 6.5 .5-2. 0- 0 0.6- 2.0 LOW
NC0231 6-30 4.5- 5.5 0.-.5 0- 0 0.6- 2.0 LOW
NC0231 30-35 4.5- 6.0 0.-.5 0- 0 0.6- 2.0 LOW
NC0231 35-66 4.5- 6.0 0.-.2 0- 0 0.6- 2.0 LOW

National Cooperative Soil Survey U.S.A.
8/15/2018 Official Series Description - PACOLET Series
https://soilseries.sc.egov.usda.gov/OSD_Docs/P/PACOLET.html 1/3
LOCATION PACOLET SC+AL GA NC VA
Established Series Rev. ECH-DJD;DTA 08/2008
PACOLET SERIES

The Pacolet series consists of very deep, well drained, moderately permeable soils that formed in residuum
weathered mostly from felsic igneous and metamorphic rocks of the Piedmont uplands. Slopes commonly are 15
to 25 percent but range from 2 to 60 percent.
TAXONOMIC CLASS: Fine, kaolinitic, thermic Typic Kanhapludults
TYPICAL PEDON: Pacolet sandy loam - forested. (Colors are for moist soil.)
A--0 to 3 inches; brown (7.5YR 5/4) sandy loam; few fine distinct yellowish red (5YR 5/8) mottles; moderate
medium granular structure; friable; many fine and medium roots; strongly acid; clear wavy boundary. (1 to 12
inches thick)
Bt1--3 to 23 inches; red (2.5YR 4/6) clay; moderate medium subangular blocky structure; firm, slightly sticky;
common distinct clay films on faces of peds; common fine and medium roots; common very fine pores;
moderately acid; gradual wavy boundary.
Bt2--23 to 29 inches; red (2.5YR 4/6) clay; common fine prominent reddish yellow (7.5YR 7/8) mottles;
moderate medium subangular blocky structure; firm, slightly sticky; common distinct clay films on faces of peds;
common very fine pores; few fine flakes of mica; moderately acid; gradual wavy boundary. (Combined thickness
of the Bt horizon is 12 to 26 inches)
BC--29 to 37 inches; red (2.5YR 4/6) clay loam; many medium prominent reddish yellow (7.5YR 7/8) mottles;
weak medium subangular blocky structure; friable; few fine flakes of mica; strongly acid; gradual wavy
boundary. (3 to 15 inches thick)
C1--37 to 52 inches; mottled red (2.5YR 4/6) and reddish yellow (7.5YR 7/8) clay loam saprolite; massive;
friable; thin discontinuous distinct clay seams in cracks; few fine flakes of mica; strongly acid; gradual wavy
boundary. (10 to 20 inches thick)
C2--52 to 80 inches; light yellowish brown (10YR 6/4) loam saprolite; common medium prominent red (2.5YR
4/6) and strong brown (7.5YR 5/8) mottles; massive; friable; strongly acid.
TYPE LOCATION: Chester County, South Carolina; 3.4 miles south of Chester in Chester County; 1.3 miles
south of junction of State Highways 16 and 350; 3,700 feet northeast of junction of State Highways 16 and 171;
0.9 mile northeast of junction of unpaved State Highway 394 and unmarked county road and unpaved private
road leading north; 35 feet northeast of unpaved private road.
RANGE IN CHARACTERISTICS: The Bt horizon is at least 10 to 24 inches thick and extends to a depth of
18 to 30 inches. Depth to a lithic contact is more than 60 inches. The soil is very strongly acid to slightly acid in
the A horizon, and very strongly acid to moderately acid throughout the rest of the profile. Content of rock
fragments, dominantly gravel, ranges from 0 to 35 percent in the A and E horizons, and 0 to 15 percent in the Bt
horizon. Most pedons have few to common flakes of mica in the solum, and few to many in the C horizon.
8/15/2018 Official Series Description - PACOLET Series
https://soilseries.sc.egov.usda.gov/OSD_Docs/P/PACOLET.html 2/3
The A horizon has hue of 5YR to 10YR, value of 3 to 5, and chroma of 1 to 6. In eroded areas, hue ranges to
2.5YR and chroma ranges to 8. The A horizon commonly is sandy loam, but ranges to loamy coarse sand, loamy
sand, fine sandy loam or loam in the fine-earth fraction. In eroded areas, it is clay loam or sandy clay loam in the
fine-earth fraction.
The E horizon, where present, has hue of 5YR to 10YR, value of 4 to 6, and chroma of 3 to 8. It commonly is
sandy loam, but ranges to loamy coarse sand, loamy sand, fine sandy loam, loam in the fine-earth fraction.
The BA or BE horizon, where present, and the upper part of the Bt in most pedons, has hue of 2.5YR to 10YR,
value of 4 to 6, and chroma of 3 to 8. It is clay loam, sandy clay loam, or loam.
The Bt horizon has hue of 10R or 2.5YR, value of 4 or 5, and chroma of 6 or 8. Mottles in shades of red, yellow,
or brown are in the upper part of the Bt horizon in some pedons and in the lower part of the Bt horizon in most
pedons. Texture is clay, sandy clay, or clay loam.
The BC horizon has hue of 10R to 5YR, value of 4 or 5, and chroma of 6 or 8 commonly with mottles in shades
of red, yellow, or brown. The BC horizon of some pedons is mottled in shades of red, yellow, or brown. It is clay
loam, sandy clay loam, loam, or sandy loam.
The C horizon has hue of 10R to 10YR, value of 4 or 5, and chroma of 3 to 8 commonly with mottles in shades
of red, yellow, or brown or is multicolored. Texture is loamy saprolite weathered from felsic crystalline rock.
COMPETING SERIES: These are the Appling, Bethlehem, Cecil, Georgeville, Herndon, Lloyd, Madison,
Nanford, Nankin, Saw, Tarrus, and Wedowee series. Appling and Cecil soils have a thicker clayey Bt horizon.
Bethlehem soils have a paralithic contact within 20 to 40 inches of the surface. Georgeville, Herndon, Nanford,
and Tarrus soils formed from Carolina slate and have more than 30 percent silt. Lloyd soils have value of 3 in at
least part of the Bt horizon. Madison soils contain more mica. Nankin soils formed from marine sediments. Saw
soils have a lithic contact within 20 to 40 inches of the surface. Wedowee soils have Bt horizons with hue of 5YR
or yellower.
GEOGRAPHIC SETTING: Pacolet soils are on gently sloping to very steep Piedmont uplands. Slopes
commonly are 15 to 25 percent but range from 2 to 60 percent. The soils formed in material weathered mostly
from felsic igneous and metamorphic rocks. The mean annual temperature ranges from 59 to 66 degrees F, the
frost-free season ranges from 190 to 240 days, and the mean annual precipitation ranges from 37 to 60 inches.
GEOGRAPHICALLY ASSOCIATED SOILS: In addition to the competing Appling, Bethlehem, Cecil, Lloyd, Madison, Saw, and Wedowee series, these are the Cataula, Lockhart, Louisburg, Rion,
and Wateree series. Cataula soils have a perched water table at 2 to 4 feet. Lockhart soils have more than 35
percent rock fragments in the particle-size control section. Louisburg, Rion, and Wateree soils have less than 35
percent clay in the particle-size control section.
DRAINAGE AND PERMEABILITY: Well drained; runoff is medium to rapid; permeability is moderate.
USE AND VEGETATION: Most areas are in forests of pine and mixed hardwoods. Cleared areas are used for
small grain, hay, and pasture.
DISTRIBUTION AND EXTENT: The Piedmont of Alabama, Georgia, North Carolina, South Carolina, and
Virginia. The series is of large extent
MLRA SOIL SURVEY REGIONAL OFFICE (MO) RESPONSIBLE: Raleigh, North Carolina
SERIES ESTABLISHED: Catawba County, North Carolina, 1969.
REMARKS: The December 1987 revision recognized the low activity clay property of this soil and
reclassification to Kanhapludults. Pacolet soils were formerly mapped as a thin solum phase of the Cecil series.
8/15/2018 Official Series Description - PACOLET Series
https://soilseries.sc.egov.usda.gov/OSD_Docs/P/PACOLET.html 3/3
Diagnostic horizons and features recognized in this pedon are: Ochric epipedon - the zone from the surface of the soil to a depth of 3 inches (A horizon). Argillic and Kandic horizon - the zone from 3 to 29 inches below the surface (Bt1 and Bt2 horizons).
MLRA=136
ADDITIONAL DATA:
TABULAR SERIES DATA: SOI-5 Soil Name Slope Airtemp FrFr/Seas Precip Elevation SC0015 PACOLET 2-60 59-66 190-240 37-60 200-900 SC0107 PACOLET 2-60 59-66 190-240 37-60 200-900
SOI-5 FloodL FloodH Watertable Kind Months Bedrock Hardness
SC0015 NONE >6.0 - >60
SC0107 NONE >6.0 - >60

SOI-5 Depth Texture 3-Inch No-10 Clay% -CEC-
SC0015 0-3 SL FSL L 0-2 80-100 8-20 4-7
SC0015 0-3 CL SCL 0-1 90-100 20-35 4-10
SC0015 0-3 LS LCOS 0-3 70-100 4-15 2-5
SC0015 3-29 SC CL C 0-1 80-100 35-65 6-18
SC0015 29-52 CL SCL SL 0-2 70-100 15-30 5-12
SC0015 52-80 SL FSL L 0-2 70-100 10-25 4-10

SC0107 0-3 GR-LS GR-LCOS 0-3 65-85 4-15 2-5
SC0107 0-3 GR-SL GR-FSL 0-3 70-85 8-20 4-7
SC0107 0-3 GR-CL GR-SCL 0-3 70-90 27-35 4-10
SC0107 3-29 SC CL C 0-1 80-100 35-65 6-18
SC0107 29-52 CL SCL SL 0-2 70-100 15-30 5-12
SC0107 52-80 SL FSL L 0-2 70-100 10-25 4-10

SOI-5 Depth -pH- O.M. Salin Permeab Shnk-Swll
SC0015 0-3 4.5-6.5 .5-2. 0-0 2.0-6.0 LOW
SC0015 0-3 4.5-6.5 .5-1. 0-0 0.6-2.0 LOW
SC0015 0-3 4.5-6.5 .5-2. 0-0 2.0-6.0 LOW
SC0015 3-29 4.5-6.0 0.-.5 0-0 0.6-2.0 LOW
SC0015 29-52 4.5-6.0 0.-.5 0-0 0.6-2.0 LOW
SC0015 52-80 4.5-6.0 0.-.5 0-0 0.6-2.0 LOW

SC0107 0-3 4.5-6.5 .5-2. - 2.0-6.0 LOW
SC0107 0-3 4.5-6.5 .5-2. 0-0 2.0-6.0 LOW
SC0107 0-3 4.5-6.0 .5-2. 0-0 0.6-2.0 LOW
SC0107 3-29 4.5-6.0 0.-.5 0-0 0.6-2.0 LOW
SC0107 29-52 4.5-6.0 0.-.5 0-0 0.6-2.0 LOW
SC0107 52-80 4.5-6.0 0.-.5 0-0 0.6-2.0 LOW

National Cooperative Soil Survey U.S.A.
8/15/2018 Official Series Description - VANCE Series
https://soilseries.sc.egov.usda.gov/OSD_Docs/V/VANCE.html 1/3
LOCATION VANCE NC+AL GA SC VA
Established Series Rev. ENH:RAG 07/1999
VANCE SERIES

The Vance series consists of well drained, slowly permeable soils that formed in residuum weathered from acid
crystalline rocks in the Piedmont. They are moderately deep to saprolite and very deep to bedrock. The soils are
on ridges and side slopes. Slopes range from 2 to 25 percent. Mean annual precipitation is 44 inches and mean
annual temperature is 61 degrees F. near the type location.
TAXONOMIC CLASS: Fine, mixed, semiactive, thermic Typic Hapludults
TYPICAL PEDON: Vance sandy loam--in a cultivated field. (Colors are for moist soil unless otherwise stated.)
Ap--0 to 5 inches; grayish brown (l0YR 5/2) sandy loam; weak medium and coarse granular structure; very
friable; many fine roots; moderately acid; abrupt smooth boundary. (4 to 9 inches thick)
Bt1--5 to l4 inches; yellowish brown (l0YR 5/8) clay; few fine prominent red mottles; weak coarse prismatic
primary structure that parts to moderate coarse angular blocky; very firm, sticky, plastic; common fine roots
between peds; common fine pores; many prominent clay films on faces of peds; strongly acid; clear smooth
boundary.
Bt2--l4 to 23 inches; strong brown (7.5YR 5/6) clay; common medium prominent red (2.5YR 5/8) mottles;
moderate medium angular blocky structure; very firm, sticky, plastic; few fine roots between peds; few fine
pores; many prominent clay films on faces of peds; strongly acid; clear wavy boundary.
Bt3--23 to 29 inches; yellowish brown (l0YR 5/8) clay loam; many medium prominent red (2.5YR 5/6) mottles;
weak fine angular blocky structure; firm, sticky, plastic; few fine roots between peds; many fine pores; few faint
clay films on faces of peds; common pockets of saprolite; strongly acid; gradual irregular boundary. (Combined
thickness of the Bt subhorizons is 18 to 30 inches)
C--29 to 72 inches; multicolored saprolite that has a loam texture; massive; friable; strongly acid.
TYPE LOCATION: Wake County, North Carolina; 3.5 miles west of Wakefield Baptist Church, 600 feet
northeast on farm road.
RANGE IN CHARACTERISTICS: Solum thickness is 24 to 40 inches over saprolite. Depth to hard bedrock
ranges from 6 to l0 feet or more. The soil is moderately acid to very strongly acid in the A horizon, unless limed.
The B and C horizons are strongly or very strongly acid. Content of coarse fragments ranges from 0 to about 35
percent by volume in the A and E horizons and 0 to l0 percent by volume in the B horizon.
The A or Ap horizon has hue of 10YR to 2.5Y, value of 3 to 6, and chroma of 2 to 6. It is fine sandy loam, sandy
loam, or coarse sandy loam or their gravelly analogues. Eroded phases are sandy clay loam or clay loam and
chroma can range to 8.
The E horizon, where present, has hue of 7.5YR to 2.5Y, value of 5 to 7, and chroma of 3 to 6. It is fine sandy
loam, sandy loam, or coarse sandy loam or their gravelly analogues.
8/15/2018 Official Series Description - VANCE Series
https://soilseries.sc.egov.usda.gov/OSD_Docs/V/VANCE.html 2/3
The BA or BE horizon, where present, has hue of 5YR to 2.5Y, value of 4 to 6, and chroma of 4 to 8. Mottles in
shades of red, brown, and yellow are present in most pedons. Texture is clay loam or sandy clay loam.
The Bt horizon has hue of 5YR to 2.5Y, value of 4 to 6, and chroma of 4 to 8. Mottles in shades of red, brown,
and yellow are present in most pedons. The lower part may contain some low chroma mottles. Texture is clay,
clay loam, or sandy clay with less than 30 percent silt. Consistence is very firm and plastic.
The BC horizon, where present, has hue of 5YR to 2.5Y, value of 4 to 6, and chroma of 4 to 8. Mottles in shades
of red, brown, and yellow are present in most pedons. The lower part may contain some low chroma mottles.
Texture is clay loam, sandy clay loam, clay, sandy clay, or loam.
The C horizon is multicolored loamy saprolite weathered from felsic crystalline rock. Texture is variable and but
commonly is clay loam, sandy clay loam, loam, or sandy loam.
COMPETING SERIES: Series in the same family are Albertville, Badin, Bengal, Bonwier, Brockroad,
Carnasaw, Catharpin, Cullen, Cunningham, Cuthbert, Enders, Endsaw, Fluvanna, Galilee, Gritney, Kirvin,
Luverne, Masada, Mattaponi, Mayodan, McQueen, Nason, Remlap, Sweatman, Tatum, Totier, Townley, Urland,
Uwharrie, and Williamsville soils. Albertville, Badin, Carnasaw, Cunningham, Enders, Endsaw, Nason,
Sweatman, and Townley soils contain sandstone, shale, or other fine-grained coarse fragments. In addition,
Badin, Bengal, and Townley soils have bedrock within 20 to 40 inches. Bonwier and Urland soils have less total
moisture during the growing season. Brockroad and Catharpin soils have lithologic discontinuity within the
series control section. Cullen, Tatum, Totier, and Uwharrie soils have hue of 5YR or redder. Cuthbert, Kirvin,
and Williamsville soils contain ironstone coarse fragments. Fluvanna soils lack mica flakes in the control section.
Galilee, Gritney, Luverne, Masada, Mattaponi, and Mayodan soils lack the very firm consistence. In addition,
Gritney, Luverne, and Mattaponi soils have formed in marine sediments and Masada soils have formed in old
alluvium. McQueen soils contain many mica flakes in the lower Bt horizon and substratum. Remlap soils have
thick sola and clay content in the series control section that ranges from 60 to 75 percent.
GEOGRAPHIC SETTING: Vance soils are on gently sloping narrow and broad ridges and sloping to
moderately steep side slopes in the Piedmont. Slopes range from 2 to 25 percent. These soils formed in residuum
weathered from felsic crystalline rock, primarily aplitic granite. Mean annual precipitation is about 44 inches and
mean annual air temperature is about 6l degrees F. near the type location.
GEOGRAPHICALLY ASSOCIATED SOILS: These are Appling, Cecil, Helena, Louisburg, Pacolet, Rion
and Wedowee soils. All these soils, except Helena, lack the very firm consistence of the Bt horizon. Appling,
Cecil, Pacolet, and Wedowee soils have kaolinitic mineralogy. Helena soils are in small depressions, head of
drainageways, and along intermittent drainageways. Louisburg, Rion, and Wilkes soils have mixed mineralogy
and less than 35 percent clay. In addition, Louisburg soils have a discontinuous Bt horizon.
DRAINAGE AND PERMEABILITY: Vance soils are well drained. Runoff is medium to rapid, and
permeability is slow. A perched water table may occur above the Bt horizon for a few days following periods of
high rainfall.
USE AND VEGETATION: The principal use is for cultivated crops and pasture. The remainder is in a mixed
hardwood and pine forest. Dominant tree species are white oak, southern red oak, mockernut hickory, loblolly
pine, shortleaf pine, and Virginia pine. Common understory plants are American holly, flowering dogwood,
sassafras, sourwood, and hophornbeam.
DISTRIBUTION AND EXTENT: Piedmont of Virginia, North Carolina, South Carolina, Georgia, and
Alabama. The series is of moderate extent.
MLRA SOIL SURVEY REGIONAL OFFICE (MO) RESPONSIBLE: Raleigh, North Carolina
SERIES ESTABLISHED: Franklin County, North Carolina; l938.
8/15/2018 Official Series Description - VANCE Series
https://soilseries.sc.egov.usda.gov/OSD_Docs/V/VANCE.html 3/3
REMARKS: This description restricts the series to soils with very firm, plastic Bt horizons which lack, in the
control section, low chroma mottles that are associated with wetness. Some low chroma particles and streaks in
the lower Bt horizons of some pedons are incompletely weathered parent materials and not mottles indicative of
wetness.
Diagnostic horizons recognized in this pedon are:
Ochric epipedon - the zone from the surface to a depth of 5 inches (Ap horizon).
Argillic horizon - the zone from 5 to 29 inches below the surface (Bt1, Bt2, and Bt3 horizons).
MLRA=136
TABULAR SERIES DATA:
SOI-5 Soil Name Slope Airtemp FrFr/Seas Precip Elevation
NC0039 VANCE 2- 25 58- 65 185-240 37- 60 350- 900

SOI-5 FloodL FloodH Watertable Kind Months Bedrock Hardness
NC0039 NONE 6.0-6.0 - 60-60

SOI-5 Depth Texture 3-Inch No-10 Clay% -CEC-
NC0039 0- 5 FSL SL COSL 0- 5 80-100 8-20 2- 6
NC0039 0- 5 GR-SL GR-COSL 5- 10 55- 80 8-20 2- 6
NC0039 0- 5 SCL CL 0- 5 90-100 20-35 4- 8
NC0039 5-29 CL SC C 0- 5 90-100 35-60 7- 13
NC0039 29-72 VAR - - - -

SOI-5 Depth -pH- O.M. Salin Permeab Shnk-Swll
NC0039 0- 5 4.5- 6.0 .5-2. 0- 0 2.0- 6.0 LOW
NC0039 0- 5 4.5- 6.0 .5-2. 0- 0 2.0- 6.0 LOW
NC0039 0- 5 4.5- 6.0 .5-1. 0- 0 0.6- 2.0 LOW
NC0039 5-29 4.5- 5.5 0.-.5 0- 0 0.06- 0.2 MODERATE
NC0039 29-72 - - - -

National Cooperative Soil Survey U.S.A.
USGS The National Map: Orthoimagery. Data refreshed October 2017.
National Flood Hazard Layer FIRMette
0 500 1,000 1,500 2,000250Feet
Ü81°13'48.98"W 35°18'6.87"N 81°13'11.52"W 35°17'37.51"N
SEE FIS REPORT FOR DETAILED LEGEND AND INDEX MAP FOR FIRM PANEL LAYOUT
SPECIAL FLOODHAZARD AR EAS
Without Base Flood Elevation (BFE)Zone A, V, A99With BFE or Depth Zone AE, AO, AH, VE, AR
Regulator y Floodway
0.2% Annual Chance Flood Hazard, Areasof 1% annual chance flood with averagedepth less than one foot or with drainageareas of less than one square mile Zone X
Future Conditions 1% AnnualChance Flood Hazard Zone XArea with Reduced Flood Risk due toLevee. See Notes.Zone X
Area with Flood Risk due to Levee Zone D
NO SCREE N Area of Minimal Flood Hazard Zone X
Area of Undetermined Flood Hazard Zone D
Channel, Culver t, or Storm SewerLevee, Dike, or Floodwall
Cross Sections with 1% Annual Chance17.5 Water Surface ElevationCoastal Transect
Coastal Transect BaselineProfile BaselineHydrographic Feature
Base Flood Elevation Line (BFE)
Effective LOMRs
Limit of StudyJurisdiction Boundar y
Digital Data Available
No Digital Data Available
Unmapped
This map complies with FEMA's standards for the use of digital flood maps if it is not void as described below. The basemap shown complies with FEMA's basemap accuracy standards
The flood hazard information is derived directly from theauthoritative NFHL web services provided by FEMA. This mapwas exported on 8/15/2018 at 4:29:43 PM and does notreflect changes or amendments subsequent to this date andtime. The NFHL and effective information may change orbecome superseded by new data over time.
This map image is void if the one or more of the following mapelements do not appear: basemap imagery, flood zone labels,legend, scale bar, map creation date, community identifiers,FIRM panel number, and FIRM effective date. Map images forunmapped and unmodernized areas cannot be used forregulatory purposes.
Legend
OTHER AREAS OFFLOOD HAZARD
OTHER AREAS
GENERALSTRUCTURES
OTHERFEATURES
MAP PANELS
8
1:6,000
B 20.2
The pin displayed on the map is an approximate point selected by the user and does not represent an authoritative proper ty location.
Wetlands
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, National Standards and Support Team,[e-mail]
Wetlands
Estuarine and Marine Deepwater
Estuarine and Marine Wetland
Freshwater Emergent Wetland
Freshwater Forested/Shrub Wetland
Freshwater Pond
Lake
Other
Riverine
August 15, 2018
0 0.2 0.40.1 mi
0 0.3 0.60.15 km
1:11,953
This page was produced by the NWI mapperNational Wetlands Inventory (NWI)
This map is for general reference only. The US Fish and Wildlife Service is not responsible for the accuracy or currentness of the base data shown on this map. All wetlands related data should be used in accordance with the layer metadata found on the Wetlands Mapper web site.
8/15/2018 NRCS Hydric Soils List
https://www.nrcs.usda.gov/Internet/FSE_DOCUMENTS/nrcseprd1316620.html 1/2
Soil Data Access (SDA) Hydric Soils List
An SDA-populated select list is used to pick a state and SSA which enables creation of a "Hydric Soils Report" based upon those selections. The data is not static; it hits
Soil Data Access Live. To reset the table hit F5 on the keyboard. Once a survey is selected and table appears, if a new survey is selected it will append to the table at the
bottom. For more information about the table,
North Carolina
selected stateId = NC
Gaston County, North Carolina
selected SSA areasymbol = NC071
State_Sym Area_Symbol Area_Name mukey Mapunit_SYM Mapunit_Name Comp_Name_phase muacres Comp_RV_Pct majcompflag Comp_Acres Comp_Land
NC NC071
Gaston
County,
North
Carolina
2439210 ChA
Chewacla loam,
0 to 2 percent
slopes,
frequently
flooded
Wehadkee, ponded 14755 5 No 737.8 flood plains
NC NC071
Gaston
County,
North
Carolina
112645 HeB
Helena sandy
loam, 1 to 6
percent slopes
Worsham, undrained 2425 0 No 0.0 depressions
NC NC071
Gaston
County,
North
Carolina
112646 HuB
Helena-Urban
land complex, 1
to 6 percent
slopes
Wehadkee,
undrained 570 5 No 28.5 depressions,
plains
NC NC071
Gaston
County,
North
Carolina
112646 HuB
Helena-Urban
land complex, 1
to 6 percent
slopes
Worsham, undrained 570 2 No 11.4 depressions
NC NC071
Gaston
County,
North
Carolina
112647 LgB
Lignum silt
loam, 1 to 6
percent slopes
Roanoke, undrained 283 1 No 2.8 depressions,
stream terrac
NC NC071
Gaston
County,
North
Carolina
112670 WoA
Worsham loam,
0 to 2 percent
slopes
Worsham, undrained 1325 80 Yes 1060.0 depressions
NC NC071
Gaston
County,
North
Carolina
112670 WoA
Worsham loam,
0 to 2 percent
slopes
Worsham, drained 1325 10 Yes 132.5 depressions

Report Metadata: Back to top
Area_Symbol: A symbol that uniquely identifies a single occurrence of a particular type of area (e.g. Dane Co., Wisconsin is WI025).
Area_Name: The name given to the specified geographic area.
mukey: A non-connotative string of characters used to uniquely identify a record in the Mapunit table.
Mapunit_SYM: The symbol used to uniquely identify the soil mapunit in the soil survey.
Mapunit_Name: Correlated name of the mapunit (recommended name or field name for surveys in progress).
Comp_Name_phase: Component name - Name assigned to a component based on its range of properties. Local Phase - Phase criterion to be used at a local level, in
conjunction with "component name" to help identify a soil component.
muacres: The number of acres of a particular mapunit.
Comp_RV_Pct: The percentage of the component of the mapunit.
majcompflag: Indicates whether or not a component is a major component in the mapunit.
Comp_Acres: The number of acres of a particular component in a mapunit. ((muacres*comppct_r)/100)
Comp_Landform: A word or group of words used to name a feature on the earth's surface, expressed in the plural form. Column Physical
Hydric_Rating: A yes/no field that indicates whether or not a map unit component is classified as a "hydric soil". If rated as hydric, the specific criteria met are
listed in the Component Hydric Criteria table.
Hydric_criteria: Criterion code for the soil characteristic(s) and/or feature(s) that cause the map unit component to be classified as a "hydric soil." These codes are
the paragraph numbers in the hydric soil criteria publication.
Criteria:
1. All Histels except Folistels and Histosols except Folists; or
2. Map unit components in Aquic suborders, great groups, or subgroups, Albolls suborder, Historthels great group, Histoturbels great group, or Andic, Cumulic, Pachic,
or Vitrandic subgroups that:
a. Based on the range of characteristics for the soil series, will at least in part meet one or more Field Indicators of Hydric Soils in the United States, or
b. Show evidence that the soil meets the definition of a hydric soil;
3. Map unit components that are frequently ponded for long duration or very long duration during the growing season that:
a. Based on the range of characteristics for the soil series, will at least in part meet one or more Field Indicators of Hydric Soils in the United States, or
b. Show evidence that the soil meets the definition of a hydric soil; or
4. Map unit components that are frequently flooded for long duration or very long duration during the growing season that:
a. Based on the range of characteristics for the soil series, will at least in part meet one or more Field Indicators of Hydric Soils in the United States, or
b. Show evidence that the soils meet the definition of a hydric soil.
8/15/2018 NRCS Hydric Soils List
https://www.nrcs.usda.gov/Internet/FSE_DOCUMENTS/nrcseprd1316620.html 2/2
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM – Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region

Project/Site: City/County: Sampling Date:
Applicant/Owner: State: Sampling Point:
Investigator(s): Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Local relief (concave, convex, none): Slope (%):
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): Lat: Long: Datum:
Soil Map Unit Name: NWI classification:
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are “Normal Circumstances” present? Yes No
Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS – Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
Is the Sampled Area
within a Wetland? Yes No
Remarks:

HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply) Surface Soil Cracks (B6)
Surface Water (A1) True Aquatic Plants (B14) Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8)
High Water Table (A2) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) Drainage Patterns (B10)
Saturation (A3) Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) Moss Trim Lines (B16)
Water Marks (B1) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) Dry-Season Water Table (C2)
Sediment Deposits (B2) Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) Crayfish Burrows (C8)
Drift Deposits (B3) Thin Muck Surface (C7) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
Algal Mat or Crust (B4) Other (Explain in Remarks) Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
Iron Deposits (B5) Geomorphic Position (D2)
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) Shallow Aquitard (D3)
Water-Stained Leaves (B9) Microtopographic Relief (D4)
Aquatic Fauna (B13) FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes No Depth (inches):
(includes capillary fringe)

Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:

Remarks:

US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0
VEGETATION (Four Strata) – Use scientific names of plants. Sampling Point:____________
Absolute Dominant Indicator
Tree Stratum (Plot size: ) % Cover Species? Status
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
= Total Cover
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover:
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: )
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
= Total Cover
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover:
Herb Stratum (Plot size: )
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
= Total Cover
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover:
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: )
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
= Total Cover
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover:
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A)

Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: (B)

Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A/B)

Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
OBL species x 1 =
FACW species x 2 =
FAC species x 3 =
FACU species x 4 =
UPL species x 5 =
Column Totals: (A) (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A =
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
2 - Dominance Test is >50%
3 - Prevalence Index is ≤3.01
4 - Morphological Adaptations1 (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation1 (Explain)

1Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:

Tree – Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height.

Sapling/Shrub – Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft (1
m) tall.

Herb – All herbaceous (non-woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.

Woody vine – All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
height.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes No

Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)

US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0
SOIL Sampling Point:
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type1 Loc2 Texture Remarks

1Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators: Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
Histosol (A1) Dark Surface (S7) 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
Histic Epipedon (A2) Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148) Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
Black Histic (A3) Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148) (MLRA 147, 148)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
Stratified Layers (A5) Depleted Matrix (F3) (MLRA 136, 147)
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N) Redox Dark Surface (F6) Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) Depleted Dark Surface (F7) Other (Explain in Remarks)
Thick Dark Surface (A12) Redox Depressions (F8)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N, Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 147, 148) MLRA 136)
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122) 3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
Sandy Redox (S5) Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148) wetland hydrology must be present,
Stripped Matrix (S6) Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147) unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):

Hydric Soil Present? Yes No
Remarks:

US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM – Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region

Project/Site: City/County: Sampling Date:
Applicant/Owner: State: Sampling Point:
Investigator(s): Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Local relief (concave, convex, none): Slope (%):
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): Lat: Long: Datum:
Soil Map Unit Name: NWI classification:
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are “Normal Circumstances” present? Yes No
Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS – Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
Is the Sampled Area
within a Wetland? Yes No
Remarks:

HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply) Surface Soil Cracks (B6)
Surface Water (A1) True Aquatic Plants (B14) Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8)
High Water Table (A2) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) Drainage Patterns (B10)
Saturation (A3) Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) Moss Trim Lines (B16)
Water Marks (B1) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) Dry-Season Water Table (C2)
Sediment Deposits (B2) Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) Crayfish Burrows (C8)
Drift Deposits (B3) Thin Muck Surface (C7) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
Algal Mat or Crust (B4) Other (Explain in Remarks) Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
Iron Deposits (B5) Geomorphic Position (D2)
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) Shallow Aquitard (D3)
Water-Stained Leaves (B9) Microtopographic Relief (D4)
Aquatic Fauna (B13) FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes No Depth (inches):
(includes capillary fringe)

Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:

Remarks:

US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0
VEGETATION (Four Strata) – Use scientific names of plants. Sampling Point:____________
Absolute Dominant Indicator
Tree Stratum (Plot size: ) % Cover Species? Status
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
= Total Cover
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover:
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: )
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
= Total Cover
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover:
Herb Stratum (Plot size: )
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
= Total Cover
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover:
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: )
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
= Total Cover
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover:
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A)

Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: (B)

Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A/B)

Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
OBL species x 1 =
FACW species x 2 =
FAC species x 3 =
FACU species x 4 =
UPL species x 5 =
Column Totals: (A) (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A =
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
2 - Dominance Test is >50%
3 - Prevalence Index is ≤3.01
4 - Morphological Adaptations1 (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation1 (Explain)

1Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:

Tree – Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height.

Sapling/Shrub – Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft (1
m) tall.

Herb – All herbaceous (non-woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.

Woody vine – All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
height.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes No

Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)

US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0
SOIL Sampling Point:
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type1 Loc2 Texture Remarks

1Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators: Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
Histosol (A1) Dark Surface (S7) 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
Histic Epipedon (A2) Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148) Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
Black Histic (A3) Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148) (MLRA 147, 148)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
Stratified Layers (A5) Depleted Matrix (F3) (MLRA 136, 147)
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N) Redox Dark Surface (F6) Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) Depleted Dark Surface (F7) Other (Explain in Remarks)
Thick Dark Surface (A12) Redox Depressions (F8)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N, Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 147, 148) MLRA 136)
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122) 3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
Sandy Redox (S5) Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148) wetland hydrology must be present,
Stripped Matrix (S6) Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147) unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):

Hydric Soil Present? Yes No
Remarks:

US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM – Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region

Project/Site: City/County: Sampling Date:
Applicant/Owner: State: Sampling Point:
Investigator(s): Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Local relief (concave, convex, none): Slope (%):
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): Lat: Long: Datum:
Soil Map Unit Name: NWI classification:
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are “Normal Circumstances” present? Yes No
Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS – Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
Is the Sampled Area
within a Wetland? Yes No
Remarks:

HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply) Surface Soil Cracks (B6)
Surface Water (A1) True Aquatic Plants (B14) Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8)
High Water Table (A2) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) Drainage Patterns (B10)
Saturation (A3) Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) Moss Trim Lines (B16)
Water Marks (B1) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) Dry-Season Water Table (C2)
Sediment Deposits (B2) Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) Crayfish Burrows (C8)
Drift Deposits (B3) Thin Muck Surface (C7) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
Algal Mat or Crust (B4) Other (Explain in Remarks) Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
Iron Deposits (B5) Geomorphic Position (D2)
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) Shallow Aquitard (D3)
Water-Stained Leaves (B9) Microtopographic Relief (D4)
Aquatic Fauna (B13) FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes No Depth (inches):
(includes capillary fringe)

Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:

Remarks:

US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0
VEGETATION (Four Strata) – Use scientific names of plants. Sampling Point:____________
Absolute Dominant Indicator
Tree Stratum (Plot size: ) % Cover Species? Status
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
= Total Cover
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover:
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: )
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
= Total Cover
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover:
Herb Stratum (Plot size: )
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
= Total Cover
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover:
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: )
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
= Total Cover
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover:
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A)

Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: (B)

Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A/B)

Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
OBL species x 1 =
FACW species x 2 =
FAC species x 3 =
FACU species x 4 =
UPL species x 5 =
Column Totals: (A) (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A =
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
2 - Dominance Test is >50%
3 - Prevalence Index is ≤3.01
4 - Morphological Adaptations1 (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation1 (Explain)

1Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:

Tree – Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height.

Sapling/Shrub – Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft (1
m) tall.

Herb – All herbaceous (non-woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.

Woody vine – All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
height.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes No

Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)

US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0
SOIL Sampling Point:
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type1 Loc2 Texture Remarks

1Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators: Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
Histosol (A1) Dark Surface (S7) 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
Histic Epipedon (A2) Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148) Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
Black Histic (A3) Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148) (MLRA 147, 148)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
Stratified Layers (A5) Depleted Matrix (F3) (MLRA 136, 147)
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N) Redox Dark Surface (F6) Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) Depleted Dark Surface (F7) Other (Explain in Remarks)
Thick Dark Surface (A12) Redox Depressions (F8)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N, Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 147, 148) MLRA 136)
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122) 3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
Sandy Redox (S5) Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148) wetland hydrology must be present,
Stripped Matrix (S6) Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147) unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):

Hydric Soil Present? Yes No
Remarks:

US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM – Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region

Project/Site: City/County: Sampling Date:
Applicant/Owner: State: Sampling Point:
Investigator(s): Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Local relief (concave, convex, none): Slope (%):
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): Lat: Long: Datum:
Soil Map Unit Name: NWI classification:
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are “Normal Circumstances” present? Yes No
Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS – Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
Is the Sampled Area
within a Wetland? Yes No
Remarks:

HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply) Surface Soil Cracks (B6)
Surface Water (A1) True Aquatic Plants (B14) Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8)
High Water Table (A2) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) Drainage Patterns (B10)
Saturation (A3) Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) Moss Trim Lines (B16)
Water Marks (B1) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) Dry-Season Water Table (C2)
Sediment Deposits (B2) Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) Crayfish Burrows (C8)
Drift Deposits (B3) Thin Muck Surface (C7) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
Algal Mat or Crust (B4) Other (Explain in Remarks) Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
Iron Deposits (B5) Geomorphic Position (D2)
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) Shallow Aquitard (D3)
Water-Stained Leaves (B9) Microtopographic Relief (D4)
Aquatic Fauna (B13) FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes No Depth (inches):
(includes capillary fringe)

Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:

Remarks:

US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0
VEGETATION (Four Strata) – Use scientific names of plants. Sampling Point:____________
Absolute Dominant Indicator
Tree Stratum (Plot size: ) % Cover Species? Status
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
= Total Cover
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover:
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: )
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
= Total Cover
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover:
Herb Stratum (Plot size: )
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
= Total Cover
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover:
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: )
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
= Total Cover
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover:
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A)

Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: (B)

Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A/B)

Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
OBL species x 1 =
FACW species x 2 =
FAC species x 3 =
FACU species x 4 =
UPL species x 5 =
Column Totals: (A) (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A =
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
2 - Dominance Test is >50%
3 - Prevalence Index is ≤3.01
4 - Morphological Adaptations1 (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation1 (Explain)

1Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:

Tree – Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height.

Sapling/Shrub – Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft (1
m) tall.

Herb – All herbaceous (non-woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.

Woody vine – All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
height.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes No

Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)

US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0
SOIL Sampling Point:
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type1 Loc2 Texture Remarks

1Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators: Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
Histosol (A1) Dark Surface (S7) 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
Histic Epipedon (A2) Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148) Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
Black Histic (A3) Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148) (MLRA 147, 148)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
Stratified Layers (A5) Depleted Matrix (F3) (MLRA 136, 147)
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N) Redox Dark Surface (F6) Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) Depleted Dark Surface (F7) Other (Explain in Remarks)
Thick Dark Surface (A12) Redox Depressions (F8)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N, Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 147, 148) MLRA 136)
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122) 3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
Sandy Redox (S5) Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148) wetland hydrology must be present,
Stripped Matrix (S6) Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147) unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):

Hydric Soil Present? Yes No
Remarks:

US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM – Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region

Project/Site: City/County: Sampling Date:
Applicant/Owner: State: Sampling Point:
Investigator(s): Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Local relief (concave, convex, none): Slope (%):
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): Lat: Long: Datum:
Soil Map Unit Name: NWI classification:
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are “Normal Circumstances” present? Yes No
Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS – Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
Is the Sampled Area
within a Wetland? Yes No
Remarks:

HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply) Surface Soil Cracks (B6)
Surface Water (A1) True Aquatic Plants (B14) Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8)
High Water Table (A2) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) Drainage Patterns (B10)
Saturation (A3) Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) Moss Trim Lines (B16)
Water Marks (B1) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) Dry-Season Water Table (C2)
Sediment Deposits (B2) Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) Crayfish Burrows (C8)
Drift Deposits (B3) Thin Muck Surface (C7) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
Algal Mat or Crust (B4) Other (Explain in Remarks) Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
Iron Deposits (B5) Geomorphic Position (D2)
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) Shallow Aquitard (D3)
Water-Stained Leaves (B9) Microtopographic Relief (D4)
Aquatic Fauna (B13) FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes No Depth (inches):
(includes capillary fringe)

Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:

Remarks:

US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0
VEGETATION (Four Strata) – Use scientific names of plants. Sampling Point:____________
Absolute Dominant Indicator
Tree Stratum (Plot size: ) % Cover Species? Status
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
= Total Cover
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover:
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: )
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
= Total Cover
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover:
Herb Stratum (Plot size: )
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
= Total Cover
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover:
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: )
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
= Total Cover
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover:
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A)

Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: (B)

Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A/B)

Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
OBL species x 1 =
FACW species x 2 =
FAC species x 3 =
FACU species x 4 =
UPL species x 5 =
Column Totals: (A) (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A =
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
2 - Dominance Test is >50%
3 - Prevalence Index is ≤3.01
4 - Morphological Adaptations1 (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation1 (Explain)

1Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:

Tree – Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height.

Sapling/Shrub – Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft (1
m) tall.

Herb – All herbaceous (non-woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.

Woody vine – All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
height.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes No

Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)

US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0
SOIL Sampling Point:
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type1 Loc2 Texture Remarks

1Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators: Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
Histosol (A1) Dark Surface (S7) 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
Histic Epipedon (A2) Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148) Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
Black Histic (A3) Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148) (MLRA 147, 148)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
Stratified Layers (A5) Depleted Matrix (F3) (MLRA 136, 147)
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N) Redox Dark Surface (F6) Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) Depleted Dark Surface (F7) Other (Explain in Remarks)
Thick Dark Surface (A12) Redox Depressions (F8)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N, Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 147, 148) MLRA 136)
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122) 3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
Sandy Redox (S5) Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148) wetland hydrology must be present,
Stripped Matrix (S6) Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147) unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):

Hydric Soil Present? Yes No
Remarks:

NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
Date: Project/Site: Latitude:
Evaluator: County: Longitude:
Total Points:
Stream is at least intermittent
if ≥ 19 or perennial if ≥ 30*
Stream Determination (circle one)
Ephemeral Intermittent Perennial
Other
e.g. Quad Name:

A. Geomorphology (Subtotal =_________) Absent Weak Moderate Strong
1a. Continuity of channel bed and bank 0 1 2 3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg 0 1 2 3
3. In-channel structure: ex. riffle-pool, step-pool,
ripple-pool sequence 0 1 2 3
4. Particle size of stream substrate 0 1 2 3
5. Active/relict floodplain 0 1 2 3
6. Depositional bars or benches 0 1 2 3
7. Recent alluvial deposits 0 1 2 3
8. Headcuts 0 1 2 3
9. Grade control 0 0.5 1 1.5
10. Natural valley 0 0.5 1 1.5
11. Second or greater order channel No = 0 Yes = 3
a artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hydrology (Subtotal = _________)
12. Presence of Baseflow 0 1 2 3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria 0 1 2 3
14. Leaf litter 1.5 1 0.5 0
15. Sediment on plants or debris 0 0.5 1 1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles 0 0.5 1 1.5
17. Soil-based evidence of high water table? No = 0 Yes = 3
C. Biology (Subtotal = _________)
18. Fibrous roots in streambed 3 2 1 0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed 3 2 1 0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance) 0 1 2 3
21. Aquatic Mollusks 0 1 2 3
22. Fish 0 0.5 1 1.5
23. Crayfish 0 0.5 1 1.5
24. Amphibians 0 0.5 1 1.5
25. Algae 0 0.5 1 1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5 Other = 0
*perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes:

Sketch:

NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
Date: Project/Site: Latitude:
Evaluator: County: Longitude:
Total Points:
Stream is at least intermittent
if ≥ 19 or perennial if ≥ 30*
Stream Determination (circle one)
Ephemeral Intermittent Perennial
Other
e.g. Quad Name:

A. Geomorphology (Subtotal =_________) Absent Weak Moderate Strong
1a. Continuity of channel bed and bank 0 1 2 3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg 0 1 2 3
3. In-channel structure: ex. riffle-pool, step-pool,
ripple-pool sequence 0 1 2 3
4. Particle size of stream substrate 0 1 2 3
5. Active/relict floodplain 0 1 2 3
6. Depositional bars or benches 0 1 2 3
7. Recent alluvial deposits 0 1 2 3
8. Headcuts 0 1 2 3
9. Grade control 0 0.5 1 1.5
10. Natural valley 0 0.5 1 1.5
11. Second or greater order channel No = 0 Yes = 3
a artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hydrology (Subtotal = _________)
12. Presence of Baseflow 0 1 2 3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria 0 1 2 3
14. Leaf litter 1.5 1 0.5 0
15. Sediment on plants or debris 0 0.5 1 1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles 0 0.5 1 1.5
17. Soil-based evidence of high water table? No = 0 Yes = 3
C. Biology (Subtotal = _________)
18. Fibrous roots in streambed 3 2 1 0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed 3 2 1 0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance) 0 1 2 3
21. Aquatic Mollusks 0 1 2 3
22. Fish 0 0.5 1 1.5
23. Crayfish 0 0.5 1 1.5
24. Amphibians 0 0.5 1 1.5
25. Algae 0 0.5 1 1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5 Other = 0
*perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes:

Sketch:

NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
Date: Project/Site: Latitude:
Evaluator: County: Longitude:
Total Points:
Stream is at least intermittent
if ≥ 19 or perennial if ≥ 30*
Stream Determination (circle one)
Ephemeral Intermittent Perennial
Other
e.g. Quad Name:

A. Geomorphology (Subtotal =_________) Absent Weak Moderate Strong
1a. Continuity of channel bed and bank 0 1 2 3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg 0 1 2 3
3. In-channel structure: ex. riffle-pool, step-pool,
ripple-pool sequence 0 1 2 3
4. Particle size of stream substrate 0 1 2 3
5. Active/relict floodplain 0 1 2 3
6. Depositional bars or benches 0 1 2 3
7. Recent alluvial deposits 0 1 2 3
8. Headcuts 0 1 2 3
9. Grade control 0 0.5 1 1.5
10. Natural valley 0 0.5 1 1.5
11. Second or greater order channel No = 0 Yes = 3
a artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hydrology (Subtotal = _________)
12. Presence of Baseflow 0 1 2 3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria 0 1 2 3
14. Leaf litter 1.5 1 0.5 0
15. Sediment on plants or debris 0 0.5 1 1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles 0 0.5 1 1.5
17. Soil-based evidence of high water table? No = 0 Yes = 3
C. Biology (Subtotal = _________)
18. Fibrous roots in streambed 3 2 1 0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed 3 2 1 0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance) 0 1 2 3
21. Aquatic Mollusks 0 1 2 3
22. Fish 0 0.5 1 1.5
23. Crayfish 0 0.5 1 1.5
24. Amphibians 0 0.5 1 1.5
25. Algae 0 0.5 1 1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5 Other = 0
*perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes:

Sketch: