WQ0014046_Staff Report_20200227

ROY COOPER
Corernw.
MICHAEL S. REGAN
Secretary
LINDA CULPEPPER
NORTH CAROLI` A
Environmental Quality
February 27, 2020
To: Water Qualit4ftrrnitting Section C ntral Office
Attn: V_ivien Zhone
No.:
From: &y
Mi h
Raleigh Regional Oflice
Granville County
1. GENERAL SITE VISIT INFORMATION
1. Was a site visit conducted? ® Yes or ❑ No
a. Date of site visit: February 21. 2020
b. Site visit conducted by: Ray Milosh
c. Inspection report attached? ® Yes or ❑ No
Application No.: WW,0014046
Permittee:
Regional Log -in
d. Person contacted: Dale Mathews and their contact information: (919) 691 - 1056 ext.
e. Driving directions:
Il. FACILITY AND APPLICATION FOR NEW AND MODIFICATION APPLICATIONS
I. Facility Classification: Is this correct? ❑ Yes ❑ No
If no, please explain:
2. Are the new treatment facilities adequate for the type of waste and disposal system?
❑ Yes ❑ No
If no, please explain:
3. Are site conditions (soils, depth to water table, etc.) consistent with the submitted
reports? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ N/A
If no, please explain:
4. Do the plans and site map represent the actual site (property lines, acreage, wells, etc.)?
❑ Yes ❑No❑N/A
If no, please explain:
5. Is the proposed residuals management plan adequate? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ N/A
FrL
\ 'N )rtl S",rr I n.a IL I, r rr- e r t n' f is.iroj a r:r InI Q%j r','y f .irn ell WaIl'f Re illtr4 CS
e��D�W �} R.de eih R [Al .ru: U:i ';.�5!}(J l:.,n, t! IJr i,c i> +1 •.yh. !li (a. nlm.r 2ri,01)

If no, please explain:
6. Are the proposed application rates (e.g., hydraulic, nutrient) acceptable? ❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ N/A
If no, please explain:
7. Are there any setbacks conflicts for proposed treatment, storage and disposal sites? ❑
Yes ❑ No ❑ N/A
If yes, attach a map showing conflict areas.
8. Is the proposed or existing groundwater monitoring program adequate? ❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ N/A
If no, explain and recommend any changes to the groundwater monitoring program:
9. For residuals, will seasonal or other restrictions be required? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ N/A
If yes, attach list of sites with restrictions (Certification B)
/11. EXISTING FACILITIES FOR MODIFICATION AND RENEWAL APPLICATIONS
1. Are there appropriately certified Operators in Charge (ORCs) for the Facility? ® Yes ❑ No
❑ N/A
ORC: Dale Mathews Certificate #: 22T94 Backup ORC: Andy Mathews Certificate #993132
2. Are the design, maintenance and operation of the treatment facilities adequate for the type
of waste and disposal system? ® Yes or ❑ No - If no, please explain below in Section IV.
Review Items
3. Are the site conditions (e.g., soils, topography, depth to water table, etc) maintained
appropriately and adequately assimilating the waste? ® Yes or ❑ No - If no, please
explain below in Section IV. Review Items
4. Has the site changed in any way that may affect the permit (e.g., drainage added, new wells
inside the compliance boundary, new development, etc.)? ❑ Yes or ® No - If yes, please
explain below in Section IV. Review Items
5. Is the residuals management plan adequate? ® Yes or ❑ No - If no, please explain below
in Section IV. Review Items
6. Are the existing application rates (e.g., hydraulic, nutrient) still acceptable? ® Yes or ❑ No
- If no, please explain below in Section IV. Review items
7. Is the existing groundwater monitoring program adequate? ® Yes ❑ No ❑ N/A
If no, explain and recommend any changes to the groundwater monitoring program below
in Section IV. Review Items
8. Are there any setback conflicts for existing treatment, storage and disposal sites? ❑ Yes or
® No
if yes, provide comments below attach a map showing conflict areas.
9. Is the description of the facilities as written in the existing permit correct? ® Yes or ❑ No
- If no, please explain below in Section M Review Items

10. Were monitoring wells properly constructed and located? ® Yes ❑ No ❑ N/A If no,
please explain below in Section IV. Review Items.
11. Are the monitoring well coordinates correct in BIMS? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ N/A
If
lease complete
the followin ex and table if necessar
Monitoring Well
Latitude
_
Longitude � ~�
r
�V
a r rr
c r aTi
O r r/
L f „
12. Has a review of all self -monitoring data been conducted (e.g., NDMR, NDAR, GW)? ® Yes
El No or❑N/A
Please summarize any findings resulting from this review below in Section IV. Review
Items.
13. Are there any permit changes needed in order to address ongoing BINIS violations? ❑ Yes
or ®No
If yes, please explain below in Section IV. Review Items.
14. Check all that apply:
® No compliance issues ❑ Current enforcement ❑ Currently under JOC
action(s)
❑ Notice(s) of violation ❑ Currently under SOC ❑ Currently under
❑ Notice(s) of deficiency moratorium
Please explain and attach any documents that may help clarify answer/comments (i.e., NOV,
NOD, etc.)
15. Have all compliance dates/conditions in the existing permit been satisfied? ® Yes ❑ No
❑ N/A
If no, please explain below in Section IV. Review Items.
16. Are there any issues related to compliance/enforcement that should be resolved before
issuing this permit?
❑ Yes ® No ❑ N/A
If yes, please explain below in Section IV. Review Items.
IV. REGIONAL OFFICE RECOMMENDATIONS
1. Do you foresee any problems with issuance/renewal of this permit? ❑ Yes or ® No
If yes, please explain:
2. List any items that you would like Central Office to obtain through an additional information
request:

3. List specific permit conditions recommended to be removed from the permit when issued:
Reason
4. List specific special conditions or compliance schedules recommended to be included in the
permit when issued:
Condition
Reason
S. Recommendation: ❑ Hold, pending receipt and review of additional information by
regional office
❑ Hold, pending review of draft permit by regional office
❑ Issue upon receipt of needed additional information
® Issue
❑ Deny [Please state reasons: ]
6. Signature of report preparer: -Z77:Z
Signature of APS regional sup isor:
Date: 2— 2
V. ADDITIONAL REGIONAL STAFF REVIEW ITEMS
Chloride and TDS sampling is required 3 times a year. All other parameters are required 4 times a year. The
ORC requested that all parameters be required 4 times a year to simplify the sampling regimen. (March, June,
September and December)
The ORC requested that water sampling of monitoring wells match the months of water sampling of effluent to
simplify the sampling regimen. (March, June and September)
The ORC requested customized NDMR and NDAR sheets.