090056_Inspection_20190711

vision of Water Resources
Facility Number j w 0 Division of Soil and Water Conservation
x
0 Other Agency
a
type of visit: ompliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
[teason for Visit: G-Ifoutine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit: /-/ Arrival Time: J' j C) I Departure Time: j ; S`T> County:
Farm Name: / /+C) 2 '`' Gj Owner Email:
Owner Name: /��.pQ� Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: ('p ! 4 i Dee' ut6k Title:
Onsite Representative:
Certified Operator: (1'6mG"s( Pw&a-,
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Latitude:
t Phone:
Region:
Integrator: �'e_g7cf��
Certification Number:
Certification Number:
Longitude:
Design Current
Design
Current
Design Current
Swine.
Capacity =,=,.Pop.,-
Wet Poultry
Capacity
Pop.
Cattle Capacity , -Pop. o
Wean to Finish
Layer
Wean to Feeder
I INon-Layer
Feeder to Finish
SfGj b0
Farrow to Wean
Design-
Current
Farrow to Feeder
Dry Poultry
Capacity
Pop.
Non -Dairy
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWR)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWR)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters
of the State other than from a discharge?
.r To ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
[-]No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
�o
❑ NA
❑ NE
[:]Yes
®-Ivo
❑ NA
❑ NE
Page 1 of 3 2/4/2015 Continued

Facility Number: - Date of Inspection:
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ Yes
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Identifier:
Spillway?: _
Designed Freeboard (in): --
Observed Freeboard (in):
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
Structure 5
❑'No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑No ❑NA ❑NE
Structure 6
❑ Yes Q'No ❑ NA ❑ NE
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
❑ Yes
2l90
❑ NA
❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environm;4FO
reat, notify DWR
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
Yes
❑ NA
❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit?
❑ Yes
alio
❑ NA
❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
❑ Yes
©-1lo
❑ NA
❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
❑ Yes
ONo
❑ NA
❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. [:]Yes I rJ lac ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop TYPe(s)=
13. Soil Type(s):
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
❑ Yes
/ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
[� Yes
2wo
❑ NA
❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable
❑ Yes
ENo
❑ NA
❑ NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
/
u 1 o
❑ NA
❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
0 NE
Required Records & Documents
facility fail
19. Did the to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
❑ Yes
EJN
❑ NA
❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑ WUP ❑ Checklists ❑ Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements
❑ Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes
To
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis
❑ Waste Transfers
❑ Weather Code
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and 1" Rainfall
Inspections ❑ Sludge Survey
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑ Yes
to
❑ NA
❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
❑ Yes
��O[—]
NA
❑ NE
Page 2 of 3
21412015 Continued

Facility Number: - Date of Inspection:
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes ET&o
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check ❑ Yes [r] N
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑ Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑NA ❑NE
26. Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification? ❑ Yes El No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency?
❑ Yes ETNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes E3 o ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes E N ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes
En -No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
E�.No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑'Fio
❑ NA
❑ NE
Comments (refer to question �#): Explain' any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or any- ther comments:.
Use drawings,of facility to better explain situations (use additional pages as necessary).
b 67 / D
Ocs,-7701 L�),J5
vdY l,(`��1 (i��t (' J /� �t� /J- b-"t �-�e_ C+.��^S s�) 'I /I de,-A/!L'S
Reviewer/Inspector Name:
Reviewer/Inspector Signatur
Page 3 of 3
Phone: tjjy3c�3/S-/
Date:21412015