090126_Inspection_20190712

UDivision of Water Resources.
Facility Number 4 Division of Soil and Water Conservation
x
O Other Agency
Type of Visit: ompliance Inspection O Operation Review O Structure Evaluation O Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: outine O Complaint O Follow-up O Referral O Emergency O Other O Denied Access
Date of Visit: Arrival Time:E=Departure Time: ,' D County: �1
Farm Name:lns,o Gip f�Ct�jrt� Owner Email:
Owner Name: 2/ % U���lj' ��� r�r��/J�c, Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: C,G�f/ �.5 �a r'G�` Title:
Onsite Representative:
Certified Operator:
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Latitude:
Phone:
Integrator:
Certification Number:
Certification Number:
Design ':Current Design Current
W t P It C
-r-
Wean to Finish
Wean to Feeder
Feeder to Finish 1
Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder
Farrow to Finish
Gilts
Boars
-Other
I I V LlIVA
e ou ry, apaccdy Pop.
Layer
Non -Layer
Design Current
Dry Poultry Capacity Pop.
Layers
Non -Layers
Pullets
Turkeys
Turkey Poults
Other
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWR)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
Longitude:
Region:
Design Current
Cattle Capacity : Pop. ,
Dairy Cow
Dairy Calf
Dairy Heifer
Dry Cow
Non -Dairy
Beef Stocker
Beef Feeder
Beef Brood Cow
❑ Yes Io ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes El N ❑ NA ❑ NE
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters ❑ Yes �o ❑ NA ❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page 1 of 3 21412015 Continued

Facility Number: -772 Date of Inspection:
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:/
Designed Freeboard (in):�
Observed Freeboard (in):
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
❑ Yes
D No
❑ NA
❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or
environmental
threat, notify DWR
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑ Yes
[i] No
❑ NA
❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit?
❑ Yes
�To
❑ NA
❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
❑ Yes
[f No
❑ NA
❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that
Yes
No
need
❑
,
❑ NA
❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes D40 ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop aWindow ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s): Zo
13. Soil Type(s): �j
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes [i]"No ❑ NA ❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
the appropriate box.
❑ WUP ❑Checklists ❑ Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements
❑ Yes [] No
❑ Yes to
❑ Yes L`J `0
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes
01 o
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
E] No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
ErNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes E3 1Vo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Weather Code
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections ❑ Sludge Survey
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes E] o ❑ NA ❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes ET<o ❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 21412015 Continued

Facility Number: - (� Date of Inspection: /�-
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes EKO
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check ❑ Yes �o
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes [EI No
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification? ❑ Yes To
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency?
❑NA ❑NE
❑NA ❑NE
❑NA ❑NE
❑NA ❑NE
❑ Yes �No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes 4
❑ Yes No
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes 0 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes Io ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Comments (refer to question #)': Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to Metter, explain situations (ease additional pages as necessary):
Reviewer/Inspector Name:
Reviewer/Inspector Signatur
Page 3 of 3
Phone:
Date:
21412015