090103_Inspection_20190712

_ Division of Water Resources
Facility Number 0 Division of Soil and Water Conservation
0 Other Agency
Type of Visit: Compli nce Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: URoutine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit: 7 — Arrival Time: q Departure Time: County: Region: �� �✓
Farm Name: Owner Email:
Owner Name: r ^ �--�y1 ��P -C /� � c. -
_ I7rl/_� rGz.``JIy75� 7f�Y `r3V",�/ i � �.��hone.
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: r+_;:3 7,j/tt) i c-k Title:
Onsite Representative: SGty�
Certified Operator:
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm: Latitude:
Phone:
Integrator:
Certification Number:
Certification Number:
Longitude:
Design Current, °•
Desiga
Current °
=P' Design Ctarrent
Swine Capacity Pop.
Wet Poultry
Capacity
__
Pop.
Cattle Capacity Pop.
Wean to Finish
Layer
Wean to Feeder
Non -La er
Feeder to Finish
Farrow to Wean c E� r
= Design
Current
Farrow to Feeder
Dry _ Poultry
Capacity
Pop.
Non -Dairy
Non -Layers
Pullets
Turke Poults
Turkeys
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWR)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWR)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters
of the State other than from a discharge?
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWR)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWR)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters
of the State other than from a discharge?
❑ Yes 10 ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑-moo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes D'Ne ❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 1 of 3 2/4/2015 Continued

Facility Number: - Date of Inspection:
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ Yes
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in): 37
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
Structure 5
No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑No ❑NA ❑NE
Structure 6
❑ Yes E j o ❑ NA ❑ NE
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes No ❑ NA
❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWR
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes []"No ❑ NA
❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes I'_I Zo ❑ NA
❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes No ❑ NA
❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need [:]Yes No ❑ NA
❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes No ❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s): D-ey`yYbL ka— 4 /, Pt AS "/u­-
13. Soil Type(s): ` x+ % / a N 0- ! -0,4— / J&JU ,-3 „
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
es
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
'es
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable
❑ Yes
©'l�wo
❑ NA
❑ NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
NA
❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
27N—o
❑ NA
❑ NE
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check esNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑ WUP ❑ Checklists ❑ Design ❑ Maps ErLease Agreements ❑ Other:
i
es record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. Q"Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Weather Code
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections ❑ Sludge Survey
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? [:]Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes ❑'9'o ❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 21412015 Continued

r
Facility Number: jDate of Inspection: '7-
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes ETNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check ❑ Yes ❑-go— ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑ Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes No ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification? ❑ YesFI-NorN❑NE
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document ❑ Yes [/] No ❑ NA ❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the ❑ Yes L"J No ❑ NA ❑ NE
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes E No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other: At
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? es No ❑ NA ❑ NE
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency? Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Comments (refer to question #): Explain any YES answers and/or apy additional recommendations or any other comment
Use drawings of facility, to better explain situations (use additional pages as necessary).
oY,�
I r ee I%C�rn u�/G,
u� c WJ`�'`
c cl
rQl Z Y
5? 7ri
Reviewer/Inspector Name:
Reviewer/Inspector Signatur
Page 3 of 3
Phone: 922 -TD-_5—t9h 1
Date:
21412015

▪ Division of Water Resources
❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number: 090103
Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Facility Status: Active
Permit: AWS090103 ❑ Denied Access
Inactive Or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Routine County: Bladen Region: Fayetteville
Date of Visit: 07/12/2019 Entry Time: 09:45 am
Farm Name: Ham Hock Farm
Exit Time: 10:10 am Incident #:
Owner Email:
Owner: Hd3 Farms of the Carolinas LLC Phone: [phone]
Mailing Address: PO Box 2107
Elizabethtown NC 283370535
Physical Address: 5014 Elkton Rd Clarkton NC 28433
Facility Status: ❑ Compliant 1 Not Compliant
Location of Farm:
Integrator: Prestage Farms Inc
Latitude: 34° 28' 57" Longitude: 78° 36' 12"
Hwy. 701 south from Clinton to Elizabethtown, go through town and turn left at McDonalds onto Mercer Rd. (SR 1700), go 5 3/4
miles, tum left on to Elton Rd. (SR 1710), go through 2 Crossroads (1712 & 1760) farm 5.1 miles on right.
Question Areas:
Dischrge & Stream Impacts Waste Col, Stor, & Treat
1. Records and Documents • Other Issues
Waste Application
Certified Operator:
Secondary OIC(s):
Samuel Allen Bragg
Operator Certification Number:
994542
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
24 hour contact name Curtis Barwick 910-385-1000
On -site representative Curtis Barwick
Primary Inspector:
Inspector Signature:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Steve Guyton
Phone: [phone]
Date:
Inspection Summary:
Farm was at 19 in. after storm.
15. spray field has been taken over by off type grass, spray field has not been cut,grass has shaded out bermuda.
could only find small spots of bermuda., offtype grass must be removed.
untill bermuda can be reasablished you need to amend WUP to have a crop to pump on.
21. correct IRR 2 form on pumping time (Curtis will do when he gets back to his office).
20 you need to have lease agreement if you pump across the road with out the land across road you are limited on pumping.
34. will follow-up on spray field condition.
Reviewed records off site @30 min.
Page 1 of 5

Permit: AWS090103
Owner: Hd3 Farms of the Carolinas LLC
Inspection Date: 07/12/19 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Facility Number: 090103
Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations
Design Capacity
Current promotions
Swine
Swine - Farrow to Wean
1,500
Waste Structures
Type
Identifier
Effective
Date
Total Design Capacity:
Total SSLW:
Built
Date
Closed
Date
Designated
Freeboard
Observed
Freeboard
Lagoon
1
04/26/2005
01/01/1992
19.00
Lagoon
P 44
04/06/2005
Lagoon
P-44
03/08/2005
Page 2 of 5

Permit: AWS090103
Inspection Date: 07/12/19
Owner: Hd3 Farms of the Carolinas LLC
Facility Number: 090103
Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at:
Structure
Application Field
Other
a. Was conveyance man-made?
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the
State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (I.e./ large
trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
waste management or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable
to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding?
Hydraulic Overload?
Frozen Ground?
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
PAN?
Is PAN > 10%/10 lbs.?
Total Phosphorus?
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil?
Outside of acceptable crop window?
Evidence of wind drift?
Application outside of application area?
Crop Type 1
Page 3 of 5
Yes No NA NE
❑ • ❑ ❑
0
0
0
❑ U ❑ ❑
O 1000
❑•❑ ❑
❑ ■❑❑
❑ ■❑❑
Yes No NA NE
❑ ❑ ❑
❑■❑❑
❑•❑ ❑
❑ • ❑ ❑
❑ • ❑ ❑
❑ ■❑❑
Yes No NA NE
❑•❑ ❑
❑•❑ ❑
❑❑❑❑❑❑❑❑❑❑❑
Com, Wheat, Soybeans

Permit: AWS090103
Inspection Date: 07/12/19
Owner: Hd3 Farms of the Carolinas LLC
Facility Number: 090103
Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application
Crop Type 2
Crop Type 3
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste
Management Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre
determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
Records and Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP?
Checklists?
Design?
Maps?
Lease Agreements?
Other?
If Other, please specify
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
Weekly Freeboard?
Waste Analysis?
Soil analysis?
Waste Transfers?
Yes No NA NE
Coastal Bermuda Grass w/
Rye Overseed
Small Grain (Wheat, Barley,
Oats)
Exum very fine sandy loam,
0 to 3% slope
Goldsboro -Urban land
complex, 0 to 3% sl
Nahunta very fine sandy
loam
Norfolk loamy fine sand, 2
to 6% slopes
❑ • ❑ ❑
• ❑ ❑ ❑
❑ • ❑ ❑
❑■❑❑
Yes No NA NE
❑ ❑ ❑
• ❑ ❑ ❑
1
IN
❑ ❑ ❑
El
El
El
El
Page 4 of 5

Permit: AWS090103
Inspection Date: 07/12/19
Owner: Hd3 Farms of the Carolinas LLC
Facility Number: 090103
Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents
Weather code?
Rainfall?
Stocking?
Crop yields?
120 Minute inspections?
Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections
Sludge Survey
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment
(NPDES only)?
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check the
appropriate box(es) below:
Failure to complete annual sludge survey
Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
and report mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes,
contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit?
(i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility?
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Application Field
Lagoon / Storage Pond
Other
If Other, please specify
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or
CAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
Page 5 of 5
Yes No NA NE
0
El
❑ • ❑ ❑
❑ • ❑ ❑
❑ • ❑ ❑
❑ III ❑ ❑
El
El
0
❑ • ❑ ❑
❑ • ❑ ❑
Yes No NA NE
❑ • ❑ ❑
❑ ❑ ❑
❑ • ❑ ❑
❑ • ❑ ❑
❑ 11❑ ❑
❑ • ❑ ❑
■❑❑❑