Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout470003_Inspection_20191202Division of Water Resources Facility Number ®- ® O Division of Soil and Water Conservation 0 Other Agency Type of Visit: ompliance Inspection O Operation Review O Structure Evaluation O Technical Assistance Reason for Visit: routine O Complaint O Follow-up O Referral O Emergency O Other O Denied Access Date of Visit: ` Arrival Time: P O Departure Time: 57 1 yy County: Y Farm Name: �� I!irck 1- � e) (i .S _n1pl ��ft Owner Email: Owner Name: lvaa/i yv f/1% rS Phone: Mailing Address: Physical Address: Facility Contact: W_ene% 9 Title: dwp , b, - Phone: Onsite Representative: Certified Operator: Back-up Operator: Location of Farm: Latitude: Region: Integrator: z- a Certification Number: Certification Number: Longitude: Design Current Design Current Design 'Current Swine Capacity,k Pop. -' Wet Poultry Capacity Pop. 'Cattle Capacity , pop. Wean to Finish Wean to Feeder Z itV( Feeder to Finish Farrow to Wean Farrow to Feeder Farrow to Finish Gilts Boars Other Layer Non -Layer Design Current Dry Pnvltry Canacitv "Pon. ` Layers Non -Layers Pullets Turkeys Turkey Poults Other Dairy Cow Dairy Calf Dairy Heifer Dry Cow Non -Dairy Beef Stocker Beef Feeder Beef Brood Cow Discharges and Stream Impacts 1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes E N ❑ NA ❑ NE Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other: a. Was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)? d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE 2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes [3] No ❑ NA ❑ NE 3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters 0 Yes �o ❑ NA ❑ NE of, the State other than from a discharge? Page 1 of 3 21412015 Continued Facility Number: Id Z - jDate of inspection: — — Waste Collection & Treatment 4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ Yes a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Identifier: Spillway?: _ Designed Freeboard (in):_ Observed Freeboard (in): _ 5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.) 6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or closure plan? Ej_N_*o ❑ NA ❑ NE [:]No ❑ NA ❑ NE Structure 6 ❑ Yes E] No [:]Yes ffNo ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ NA ❑ NE If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWR 7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? Ellyes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE 8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes �o ❑ NA ❑ NE (not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks) 9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes [] N ❑ NA ❑ NE maintenance or improvement? Waste Application 10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes C:fNo ❑ NA ❑ NE maintenance or improvement? 11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes to ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.) ❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil ❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of/Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area 12. Crop Type(s):�'Nd 13. Soil Type(s): H p4pI.— 14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes allo ❑ NA ❑ NE 15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes E1 o ❑ NA ❑ NE 16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE acres determination? 17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes N ❑ NA ❑ NE 18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? El Yes WNo ❑ NA ❑ NE Required Records & Documents 19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available? ❑ Yes ]j No ❑ NA ❑ NE 20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check ❑ Yes [!]No ❑ NA ❑ NE the appropriate box. ❑ WUP ❑ Checklists ❑ Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑ Other: 21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes �o ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Weather Code ❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspectionse ❑ Sludge Survey 22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes �/No ❑ NA ❑ NE 23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? [—]Yes E No ❑ NA ❑ NE Page 2 of 3 21412015 Continued Facility Number: q7 - ` Date of Inspection: / 24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes L11VO 25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check ❑ Yes Q'�o the appropriate box(es) below. ❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑ Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels ❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance: 26. Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes []'No 27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification? ❑ Yes [3N Other Issues 28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document and report mortality rates that were higher than normal? 29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately. 30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application) 31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other: 32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? 33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative? 34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency? ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑NA ❑NE ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑NA ❑NE ❑ Yes Q No ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Yes []] No ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Yes ICJ o ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Yes [] No ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Yes [r] No ❑ Yes [E["No ❑ YesFI-No ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑NA ❑NE ❑NA ❑NE Comments (refer to question #): Explain any YES answers and/or any additionalrecommendations or any other comments. Use drawings of facility to better explain situations (use additional pages as necessary). 0 l,U(i ! /\ L--x- bdl ,,-- u .mac +5 ems- /, 0 or , Reviewer/Inspector Name: Reviewer/Inspector Signatui Page 3 of 3 Phone: 9-/- o ` � L2 /✓� Date: �l g _, l % 2141201 S