510030_Compliance Evaluation Inspection_20200218

0a-I -1
Facility Number
W Division of Water Resources
0 Division of Soil and Water Conservation
0 Other Agency
Type of Visit: 12F Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: _'Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit: 13 �� Arrival Time: Departure Time: ' County: �O i1 Region:
Farm Name: UtIlly U812417X Owner Email:
Owner Name: Doniel 1<nra P#ay - Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address: 433 NoflpvU Pflrseh23
n
Facility Contact: ! Title: UflSURont Phone:
Onsite Representative: ateOaill Integrator: i1936
Certified Operator: I)a,jel Iiowf4y Certification Number: 60ySI yo 1wl�
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm: Latitude:
Swine
Wean to Finish
Wean to Feeder
Feeder to Finish
Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder
Farrow to Finish
Gilts
Boars
Other
Other
Certification Number:
!SCANTa D
Design Current Design Current
Capacity Pop. Wet Poultry Capacity Pop.
[ILayer
Non -Layer
Non-L,
Pullets
Other
Poults
Design Current
Discharges and Stream Impacts
I. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWR)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWR)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the watet%
of the State other than from a discharge?
Longitude:
Design Current
Cattle Capacity Pop.
Dairy Cow
Dairy Calf
Dairy Heifer
Dry Cow
,Non -Dairy
Beef Stocker
Beef Feeder
Beef Brood Cow
❑ Yes CZNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
[—]Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes No
❑ YesNo
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑NA ❑NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
Page I of 3 21412015 Continued

w
Facility Number: 5 - Q jDate of Inspection: 511,315
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ Yes 'No ❑ NA ❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Structure 5
Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in): - �q
Observed Freeboard (in):
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
❑ Yes
P No
❑ NA
❑ NE
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
❑ Yes
CZ No
0 NA
❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health
or environmental threat, notify DWR
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑ Yes
� No
❑ NA
[] NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit?
❑ Yes
[] No
❑ NA
❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
[] NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
1 I . Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes & No ❑ NA ❑ NE
ION
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s): �r}
I3. Soil Type(s):
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA 0 NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
M No
❑ NA
❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
�Z No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
� No
❑ NA
❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑ WUP ❑Checklists ❑ Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements
❑Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis
❑ Waste Transfers
❑ Weather
Code
❑ Rainfall [:]Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and I" Rainfall Inspections
❑ Sludge Survey
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑ Yes
PNo
❑ NA
0 NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
❑ Yes
❑ No
� NA
❑ NE
Page 2 of 3
21412015 Continued

Facifi ' Number: - 3 Date of Inspection: a
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes U No ❑ NA ❑ NE
25. is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check ❑ Yes [� No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑ Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes tZ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification? ❑ Yes ❑ No [SNA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours andlor document ❑ Yes fo No ❑ NA ❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? ❑ Yes 0 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
❑ Yes
[)I No
❑ NA
❑ NE
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? I f yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes
(Z No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
❑ Yes
[E No
❑ NA
❑ NE
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss reviewlinspection with an on -site representative?
❑ Yes
n No
❑ NA
❑ NE
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency?
❑ Yes C'No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Comments (refer to question #): Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations (use additional pages as necessary).
gy
t) /Aj +vi (Y1�f CP has Con ]nv,1� @� b -�I� t a� 1,
--slUsdrr�Siuj. _o AC
a �4 elIv�ech.f'�e�j'�
rxx1j �4��e s
`ho , �3eTh ij wolW o4-
abA �' hs/IL p ti �Idsir4y �6 rah ae e, -;,11 /P medidw j �- gle4j
%hfCovdrd e fs� S10� es fie W00c11401� 101100q. %
a � a�- Cali r 01 1509�m� a'75'Pf� Pivot al�1M13oD-L
a j_ Soil -t -
�►��n _byy Bunn ��dr�e , CU 21) e0K. p T c r�a0
I tc Thal S P v-'e, mI-
Abe l Rri as )v)�la Or`iv�c Gayer ins 'ad V&')Vhfta l/v A
r
rallal�� w003&aq eNVU) PAW;
3) 19 woo 5g0y
jai 1�11S W003q38
Will Iq 7s q -� da-�_,
Reviewerl Inspector Name: Jowa_ ;
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
Page 3 of 3
1 `t -- 7 or rl?
Phone: ljjq�121-q33
Date: l II E s Ij a. ar c
1/4/2015