Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout20130957 Ver 1_Year 5 Monitoring Report_2019_20200227ID#* 20130957 Version* 1 Select Reviewer:* Mac Haupt Initial Review Completed Date 02/28/2020 Mitigation Project Submittal - 2/27/2020 Is this a Prospectus, Technical Proposal or a New Site?* r Yes r No Type of Mitigation Project:* V Stream r- Wetlands r` Buffer r` Nutrient Offset (Select all that apply) Project Contact Information Contact Name:* Harry Tsomides Project Information ......................................................................... ID#:* 20130957 Existing IDY Project Type: Project Name: County: r DMS r Mitigation Bank Tributaries of Wicker Branch Union Document Information Email Address:* harry.tsomides@ncdenr.gov Version: *1 Existing Version Mitigation Document Type:* Mitigation Monitoring Report File Upload: Tribs of Wicker Branch _95022_MY5_2019.pdf 21.59MB Rease upload only one RDFof the conplete file that needs to be subnitted... Signature Print Name:* Harry Tsomides Signature:* ���•t t% r.'srrr���l YEAR 5 of 5 Monitoring Report Tributaries of Wicker Branch Stream Restoration Union County, North Carolina DMS Project Number: 95022 Contract No: 003982 USACE Action Id No: SAW 2013-01680 Yadkin River 03040105 Prepared for: NC Department of Environmental Quality Division of Mitigation Services 1652 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC 27699-1652 Data Collection Period November 2019 Submitted: February 2020 YEAR 5 of 5 Monitoring Report Tributaries of Wicker Branch Stream Restoration Union County, North Carolina DMS Project Number: 95022 Contract No: 003982 USACE Action Id No: SAW 2013-01680 Yadkin River 03040105 Prepared for: NC Department of Environmental Quality Division of Mitigation Services 1652 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC 27699-1652 Prepared by: 701 Corporate Center Drive, Suite 475 Raleigh, NC 27607 Phone: 919-854-6200 Fax: 919-854-6259 February 2020 February 11, 2020 Harry Tsomides North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality Division of Mitigation Services 5 Ravenscroft Dr., Suite 102 Asheville, NC 28801 RE: Year 5 (2019) Monitoring Report the Tributaries of Wicker Branch Project (DMS Project # 95022) Dear Mr. Tsomides, Please find enclosed two copies of the Year 5 Monitoring Report for the Tributaries of Wicker Branch Project. Also included is a disc containing the Digital Data submission files. This report has been finalized following your review comments dated January 9, 2020. The following changes have been made to the draft report based on your comments (in italics). Please include copies of both the 2017 IRT site meeting minutes, and the AECOM January 2019 memo to DMS (addressing site concerns) in an Appendix, and reference them in the Project Summary. A short paragraph has been added to the Project Summary and the memos have been included as Appendix F. Also included was my memo dated May 3, 2018 that was a response to the IRT site meeting. If possible, please add a photo of the recently repaired structure on Tributary 1b. A photo of the repair was added to the end of Appendix B. Digital support file comments DMS does not have spatial features for the creditable assets for the site. Please provide features that characterize the creditable assets that have been reported, ensuring that features are segmented and attributed as they are in the asset table and that feature lengths match the linear feet reported. The shapefiles in Figure 2 Assets were modified to match the asset table. A map package of Figure 2 as well as the asset shapefile can be found in the digital submittal under 6.0 Other. - There is no MY5 CVS file within the given data. The MY5 cvs (raw survey data) has been placed in the digital submittal under 4. Geomorphological Data. AECOM 701 Corporate Center Drive Suite 475 Raleigh, North Carolina 27607 www.aecom.com 919 854 6200 tel 919 854-6259 fax - Please provide DMS with stream gage data and precipitation data used to create streamflow figures. The stream gauge data and precipitation data has been placed in the digital submittal under 5. Hydro. The precipitation data is included on the same spreadsheet as the flow as well as in a separate spreadsheet. If you have any questions regarding this Monitoring Report, please feel free to give me a call. Regards, Ron Johnson Project Manger AECOM Technical Services of North Carolina, Inc. i Tributaries to Wickers Branch Stream Restoration Site Year 5 (2019) Monitoring Report DMS Project No. 95022 Table of Contents 1.0 PROJECT SUMMARY ......................................................................................................... 1 2.0 METHODOLOGY ................................................................................................................. 3 2.1 VEGETATION .................................................................................................................. 3 2.2 STREAM ASSESSMENT ................................................................................................. 4 2.3 VISUAL ASSESSMENT ................................................................................................... 4 2.4 DIGITAL PHOTOS ........................................................................................................... 4 3.0 REFERENCES .................................................................................................................... 4 ii Tributaries to Wickers Branch Stream Restoration Site Year 5 (2019) Monitoring Report DMS Project No. 95022 APPENDICIES Appendix A – Background Tables Figure 1: Vicinity Map Figure 2: Stream Assets Map Table 1: Project Components and Mitigation Credits Table 2: Project Activity and Reporting History Table 3: Project Contacts Table 4: Project Baseline Information and Attribute Appendix B – Visual Assessment Data Figure 3: Current Condition Plan View Table 5: Visual Stream Morphology Stability Assessment Table 6: Vegetation Condition Assessment Photos: Stream Stations Photos: Vegetation Plots Appendix C – Vegetation Plot Data Table 7: Vegetation Plot Counts and Densities Appendix D – Stream Geomorphology Data Cross-Sections Longitudinal Profiles Pebble Counts Table 8: Baseline Stream Data Summary Table 9a: Cross-Section Morphology Data Table 9b: Stream Reach Morphology Data Appendix E – Hydrologic Data Table 10: Verification of Bankfull Events Appendix F – 2018 IRT Site Visit Memorandum and Response 1 Tributaries to Wickers Branch Stream Restoration Site Year 4 (2018) Monitoring Report DMS Project No. 95022 1.0 PROJECT SUMMARY The Tributaries of Wicker Branch Stream Restoration Project is located in Union County, North Carolina in the Yadkin River Basin, (HUC 03040105081010), and within a North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality, Division of Mitigation Services (DMS) Targeted Local Watershed (TLW). It is also located within the watershed of Lanes Creek, a 303d-listed stream and Water Supply Watershed. The project site consists of four headwater stream channels that flow through agricultural land and prior to restoration efforts were devoid of riparian vegetation. Past and present agricultural use of the land had severely impacted and degraded the channels. The project goals address stressors identified in the TLW and include the following: • Improved water quality in Wicker Branch. • Improve aquatic habitat in the tributary channels. • Provide aesthetic value, wildlife habitat, and bank stability through the creation of a riparian zone. • Create a contiguous wildlife corridor, with connection of some isolated adjacent natural habitats to larger downstream forested tracts. • Provide shading and biomass input to the stream and mast for wildlife when vegetation is mature. These objectives were achieved through restoring, enhancing, and preserving 4020 feet of perennial and intermittent stream channel. The riparian areas were also planted with native vegetation to improve habitat and protect water quality. The project reaches consist of Tributary 1A (Priority 1 Restoration), Tributary 1B (Enhancement Level II including invasive species control), Tributary 2 (Preservation), Tributary 3 (Enhancement Levels I and II), and Tributary 4 (Enhancement Level II)(See Table 1 in Appendix A and Figure 2 in Appendix A). Tributary 2 was determined to be unsuitable for mitigation credits during a site visit with the USACE in August, 2011. It was requested by the USACE that a 30 foot buffer and conservation easement be acquired to provide riparian habitat connectivity between the restored segments of Tributary 1A and upstream wooded areas. An Interagency Review Team (IRT) visit to the site was performed in April 25 that identified several issues that included: • Areas of low stem density • Lack of channel formation on Tributary 3 between wetlands • Bankfull data event collection and verification • Presence of invasive privet along Tributary 1b • Easement encroachments at several equipment crossings A memorandum documenting the meeting and the actions taken is included in Appendix F. A site visit was also performed by DMS Property and NCDEQ Stewardship personnel on October 5, 2018. A memorandum documenting their concerns and the actions taken is also included in Appendix F. 2 Tributaries to Wickers Branch Stream Restoration Site Year 4 (2018) Monitoring Report DMS Project No. 95022 Project success will be determined by monitoring channel stability and vegetation within the easement. Success criteria have been outlined in the 2013 Mitigation Plan and include a stable dimension, pattern, and profile documented through the surveying of cross-sections and longitudinal profiles. Vegetation monitoring plots will have a minimum of 260 stems per acre after 5 years. Project design was completed in December 2013 and the project constructed in September and October 2014. Planting was complete in March 2015 (See Table 2 in Appendix A). Herbaceous vegetation is well established though out the easement. The vegetation monitoring plots show an average density of 445 stems per acre down from baseline planting of 684 stems per acre but still well above the 320 stems per acre at end of year 3 and 260 stems per acre at year 5. Two plots do not meet the vegetation success criteria. Plots 6 and 10 are at 243 stems per acre, just under the success criteria. A number of volunteer woody stems are present throughout the easement. Volunteer species included black locust, elm, box elder, persimmon, oaks, sweetgum, pine, willows, elderberry, and redbud. Work on controlling or removing invasive species occurred throughout the summer. Chinese privet (Ligustrum sinense) that was present in the buffer along Tributary 1B responded well to treatment in 2018 contained isolated stems which were cut and treated in 2019. Isolated privet that has started to appear in the buffer along Tributary 1A, and Tributary 4 were also treated. Several areas of dense honeysuckle (Lonicera japonica) that developed in isolated areas on Tributary 1 and 3 were treated in 2019. Scattered chinaberry (Melia azedarach) trees along the edges of Tributary 1 and 3 were cut as well. A small area of cat-tails (Typha sp.) was also treated but did not seem to respond to the herbicide. The cat-tails will be treated again in the spring once growth begins. The restored stream channels appear to be stable with no areas of bank erosion observed. During construction in 2014 a headcut at the bottom of Tributary 1B was stabilized with a log sill and stone. Floodplain flows during bankfull events started to erode the bank around the left bank side of the sill in 2018. This was repaired in 2019 by filling the eroding area with soil and rock and placing a log sill in the floodplain to direct flow away from the end of the instream sill (see photograph at the end of Appendix B). The adjacent fields were planted in corn in 2019. The only encroachment that has occurred this year is at the top of Tributary 2. The encroachment has occurred because the equipment crossing is not wide enough to accommodate the farmers equipment. AECOM is working with the landowner and the farmer that leases the property to develop a temporary exception to the easement that will allow access. The buffer present in this area is along an ephemeral drainage that does not generate any credits and not along the main stream channel (Tributary 1). The area of encroachment is shown on Figure 3 in Appendix B. Hydrology AECOM is currently monitoring the stream flow on Tributaries 1 and 3 using Onset HOBO pressure transducers. Transducers are installed in two separate pools on each of the tributaries for a total of 4 locations. On Tributary 1A a transducer is located on the downstream end of the project and a second is located above the confluence with Tributary 2. On Tributary 3 one 3 Tributaries to Wickers Branch Stream Restoration Site Year 4 (2018) Monitoring Report DMS Project No. 95022 transducer is located on the downstream end and a second is located in a pool just below the wetland at the beginning of the Enhancement I reach. The locations of the transducers are shown on Figure 3 Current Condition Plan View in Appendix B. The transducers are suspended in the pool at a set elevation and use pressure to measure the depth of water over (above) the transducer. The elevation of the transducer is known, as is the elevation of the head of the riffle and the top of the bank (for bankfull flow). When the elevation of the water level in the pool above the transducer exceeds the elevation of the head of the riffle, then it is assumed that flow is occurring. The data for the transducers (which monitor flow) is presented in graphs that can be found in Appendix E. A large rain event in early October 2018 (1.2 inches on October 10 and 1.9 inches on October 11) recharged flow in the site tributaries so that flow was typically present through April. Tributary 1 had continuous flow in the lower portion from October 21, 2018 through April 22, 2019. The upper portion of Tributary 1 fluctuated a bit more but had continuous flow from January 23 through April 22, 2019. Tributary 3 had flow in both the upper and lower reaches from October through April 22, 2019. A bankfull event was recorded by the transducers on April 8, 2019 and confirmed through visual observation of rack lines and debris in the floodplain during an April 22, 2019 site visit. Bankfull events were also recorded on February 22, and March 1, 2019 by the transducers. Tributary 3 Stream Mitigation Units The project as described in the Mitigation Plan is projected to generate 2539.65 SMUs through a mixture of Restoration, Enhancement I, and Enhancement II. During the Interagency Review Team (IRT) site visit in April 2017 it was noted that the upper reach located between two wetland areas was silted in and lacked a distinct channel. This reach is 264 feet in length and has been proposed as Enhancement II at a Mitigation Ratio of 2.5:1. This length was projected to generate 105.6 SMUs. During the October 2018 monitoring it was observed that a channel was starting to reform in this reach. The channel will continued to be monitored to see if a channel continues to reform and to what extent (length). 2.0 METHODOLOGY Vegetation survival, channel stability, and wetland hydrology were monitored on the project site. Post restoration monitoring will occur for a minimum of five years or until success criteria are met. 2.1 VEGETATION Eleven vegetation plots were established and assess for the baseline vegetation monitoring. The Carolina Vegetative Survey-EEP Protocol Level 2 methodology was used to sample vegetation on October 14 and 15, 2015 (Lee et al. 2006, http://cvs.bio.unc.edu/methods.htm). 4 Tributaries to Wickers Branch Stream Restoration Site Year 4 (2018) Monitoring Report DMS Project No. 95022 2.2 STREAM ASSESSMENT Twelve permanent monitoring cross-sections have been established on the site as follows: • Tributary 1A (1,390 feet) – 4 riffle and 3 pool cross-sections • Tributary 3 (640 feet) – 2 riffle and 1 pool cross-sections • Tributary 4 (631 feet) – 2 riffle cross-sections Wolman pebble counts were conducted on each cross-section. Particle sizes less than 2.0 millimeters (mm) were determined by touch using the following guidelines: • Silt – Smooth feeling (not gritty) • Fine sand – Slightly gritty texture • Coarse sand – Very gritty texture Multiple parameters were located including top of bank, thalweg, and water surface. Pool and riffle features were called out to calculate feature slopes and lengths. The survey was performed with a survey grade GPS (Trimble TCS3 with an R8 Model 3 GNSS receiver). 2.3 VISUAL ASSESSMENT A visual assessment of the stream was performed to assess the bank (lateral stability), bed (vertical stability), the easement boundary, and site vegetation. 2.4 DIGITAL PHOTOS Digital photos of each of the vegetation plots and each cross-section were also taken as seen in Appendix B. 3.0 REFERENCES Lee, M.T., R.K. Peet, S.D. Roberts, T.R. Wentworth. 2006. CVS-EEP Protocol for RecordingVegetation Version 4.0. Tributaries to Wickers Branch Stream Restoration Site Year 5 (2019) Monitoring Report DMS Project No. 95022 APPENDIX A – General Figures and Tables Figure 1: Vicinity Map Figure 2: Stream Assets Map Table 1: Project Components and Mitigation Credits Table 2: Project Activity and Reporting History Table 3: Project Contacts Table 4: Project Baseline Information and Attribute 1. Vicinity Map £¤74 Tributaries of Wicker Branch Stream Restoration Site O UNION ANSON STANLY MECKLENBURG CABARRUS §¨¦485 £¤74 Tributaries of Wicker Branch Stream Restoration Site (DMS No. 95022) Union County, NC ¯Monroe 0120.5 Miles Site Boundary SnydersStoreRdM e dlin R d BelkMillRdO ld P a g ela n d- M o n ro e R d Wingate £¤601 O ld M o n ro e- M ars h ville R d St ackRdGriffithRdWolfPondRdMacedoniaChurchRdFrom the sourtheast of Monroe take US Highway 601 South 6.3 miles to Griffin Cemetery Road. Turn left onto Griffin Cemetery Road. Follow Griffin Cemetery Road approximately 0.7 miles and turn right onto gravel drive. Follow gravel drive to farm field and to the head of Tributary 1A. 2. Stream Assets Map MONTG-OMERY UNION ANSON STANLYMECKLENBURG CABARRUS Tributaries of Wicker BranchStream R esto rat ion Sit e (DMS No . 95022)Union County, NC 0 500 1,000250 Feet Legend Easement Boundary No Credit Restoration Enha ncement I Enha ncement II Tr ibutary 1A Tr ibutary 3 Tribu tary 1B Tr ibutary 4 74 Type R RETotals 2539.67 0Mitigation RatioSMUs by Reach1:1 1390.003:1 365.00N/A 0.002.5:1 105.601.5:1 426.672.5:1 252.40CreationHigh Quality PreservationPreservationEnhancement II 1990Restoration 1390Enhancement I 640EnhancementUpland(acres)Riverine Non-RiverineComponent SummationRestoration LevelStream(linear feet)Riparian Wetland(acres)Non-Riparian Wetland (acres)Buffer (square feet)Tributary 4 631 Enhancement II Enhancement II 631Tributary 3 640 Enhancement I Enhancement I 640Tributary 3 264 Enhancement II Enhancement II 264Tributary 2 330 N/A N/A 330Tributary 1B 1095 Enhancement II Enhancement II 1095Tributary 1A 1293 RestorationProject ComponentsProject Component Stationing/Location Existing FootageRestoration 1390ApproachRestoration or Restoration EquivalentRestoration FootageRRE R RETable 1. Project Components and Mitigation CreditsTributaries of Wicker Branch Stream Restoration/ DMS No. 95022Mitigation CreditsStream Riparian Wetland Non-riparian Wetland BufferNitrogen OffsetPhosphorous Offset Activity or Report Data Collection Complete Completion or Delivery Restoration Plan Dec-13 Dec-13 Final Design – Construction Plans Mar-14 Mar-14 Construction Nov-14 Nov-14 Permanent seed applied to entire site Nov-14 Nov-14 Plantings for entire site Mar-15 Mar-15 Mitigation Plan (Year 0 Monitoring – baseline)May-15 Jan-16 Year 1 Monitoring - Vegetation and Stream Channel Oct-15 Mar-16 Year 2 Monitoring - Vegetation and Stream Channel Oct-16 Dec-16 Invasives Control Oct-17 Oct-17 Year 3 Monitoring -Vegetation and Stream Channel Oct-17 Feb-18 Invasives Control July/Spt-18 July/Spt-18 Year 4 Monitoring Vegetation and Stream Channel Oct-18 Jan-19 Invasives Control May-19 May, July -19 Year 5 Monitoring -Vegetation and Stream Channel Nov-19 Feb-20 Table 2. Project Activity and Reporting History Tributaries of Wicker Branch Stream Restoration/ DMS No. 95022 Owner NCDEQ - Division of Mitigation Services Harry Tsomides NCDEQ - Division of Mitigation Services 5 Ravenscroft Drive, Suite 102 Asheville, NC 28801 (828) 545-7057 Designer Ron Johnson, Project Manager AECOM of North Carolina, Inc. 701 Corporate Center Drive, Suite 475 Raleigh, NC 27607 (919) 854-6210 Landowner 3308 Old Pageland Monroe Rd. Richard Simpson Monroe, NC 28112 704-506-5184 Riverworks 6105 Chapel Hill Road Raleigh, NC 27607 Efird's Landscaping 42759 Greenview Drive Albemarle, NC 38001 (704) 985-6559 Riverworks Invasives Contractor Habitat Assessment & Restoration Professionals Charlotte, North Carolina Monitoring Performer 701 Corporate Center Drive, Suite 475 AECOM of North Carolina, Inc. Raleigh, NC 27607 919-760-4000 Seeding Contractor Table 3. Project Contact Table Tributaries of Wicker Branch Stream Restoration/ DMS No. 95022 Planting Contractor Construction Contractor Trib 1A Trib 1B Trib 2 Trib 3 Trib 4 1293 1095 330 1184 631 Type II Type II Type II Type II Type II 71.5 94.5 17.6 32.7 29.8 38.5 38.5 27 43 31.5 WS-V WS-V WS-V WS-V WS-V B4c, G4c, F4 C4/F4 N/A F/B6c/F6 N/A* GFC N/A N/A GFC N/A Cid channery silt loam Chewacla silt loam Cid channery silt loam, Badin channery silt loam Cid channery silt loam Cid channery silt loam, Goldston- Badin complex Moderately well drained/ somewhat poorly drained Somewhat poorly drained Moderately well drained/ somewhat poorly drained, well drained Moderately well drained/ somewhat poorly drained Somewhat poorly drained to excessively drained No Yes No No No 1.30% 1.00% 1.70% 1.40% 1.00% Zone X Zone X Zone X Zone X Zone X None Mesic Mixed Hardwoods None None None 0 50 % Understory 0 0 0 Regulation Resolved Waters of the US – Section 404 Yes Waters of the US – Section 401 Yes Endangered Species Act Yes Historic Preservation Act N/A CZMA/CAMA N/A FEMA Floodplain Compliance N/A Essential Fisheries Habitat N/A No No Applicable Yes Yes Yes No No Regulatory Considerations FEMA Classification Native Vegetation Percent Composition of Exotic Invasive Vegetation Drainage Class Soil Hydric Status Slope Morphological Description Evolutionary Trend Underlying Mapped Soils Drainage area (acres) NCDWQ Stream ID Score NCDWQ Water Quality Classification Reach Summary Information (Pre-restoration) Parameters Length of Reach (feet) Valley Classification Project Drainage Area (acres) 173 Project Drainage Area Percentage of Impervious Area 2% to 3% CGIA Land Use Classification Cultivated/Managed Herbaceous Cover Project River Basin Yadkin-Pee Dee USGS HUC for Project 3040105081010 NCDWQ Sub-basin for Project 3/7/2014 Project County Union Project Area (acres)15.49 Physiographic Province Carolina Slate Belt - Piedmont Table 4. Project Baseline Information and Attributes Tributaries of Wicker Branch Stream Restoration/ DMS No. 95022 Project Information Project Coordinates (lat/long) 34.8946849, -80.4472082 Project Watershed Summary Project Name Tributaries of Wicker Branch Tributaries to Wickers Branch Stream Restoration Site Year 5 (2019) Monitoring Report DMS Project No. 95022 APPENDIX B – VISUAL ASSESSMENT DATA Figure 3: Current Condition Plan View Table 5: Visual Stream Morphology Stability Assessment Table 6: Vegetation Condition Assessment Photos: Stream Stations Photos: Vegetation Plots Existing Unimproved RoadDrivewayWicker BranchUTTributary 3 Tributary 4 Trib utary 1A Tributary 1B Trib utary 2 Wicker BranchVP - 5VP - 3 VP - 4 VP - 1VP - 9VP - 6VP - 2VP - 8VP - 7VP - 11VP - 10Existing Condition Plan ViewTributaries of Wicker Branch Stream RestorationUnion County, NCDMS Project No. 95022010050Scale in FeetFIGURE3Year 5 Conditions Photo Locations Vegetation Plots Cr iteria Met Cr iteria Not Met Figure 3a Figure 3c Figure 3b LegendCross SectionsEquipment CrossingLog SillLevel SpreaderExisting WetlandsEasement BoundaryStream Existing Unimproved RoadTrib utary 1A Trib utary 2 Tributary 1AXS-9XS-11XS-1 X S -6 X S -7 X S -4XS-3 Cattails andhoneysuckletreated Honey suckle andprivet treated and removed VP - 3 VP - 4 VP - 1 VP - 2XS-8XS-12XS-2 X S -5XS-10PhotoMonitoringPoint 1 PhotoMonitoringPoint 2 PhotoMonitoringPoint 6 0+00 1+00 2+00 3+00 4+00 8+00 5+00 6+00 7+00 9+00 10+00 11+00 12+00 Tr ansducer 1 Tr ansducer 2 Existing Condition Plan ViewTributaries of Wicker Branch Stream RestorationUnion County, NCDMS Project No. 95022010050Scale in FeetFIGURE3aYear 5 Conditions Sta tioning Photo Locations Crest Gauge Tran sducer Enchroachment Vegetation Plots Cr iteria Met Cr iteria Not Met As sets No Credit Restoration Enhan cement I Enhan cement II LegendUnimproved RoadCulvertCross SectionsEquipment CrossingLog SillLevel SpreaderStreamEasement BoundaryExisting Wetlands Wicker BranchTributary 1B Trib utary 1A Wicke r Branch Priv et sc at tered through floodp la in treatedXS-9XS-11XS-1 X S -6 X S -7 X S -4XS-3 Cattails andhoneysuckletreated Scour aroundlog sill repaired Honeysuckle andprivet treated and removed VP - 3 VP - 4XS-8XS-12XS-2 X S -5XS-1011+00 12+00 13+00 14+00 15+00 16+00 17+00 18+00 19+00 20+00 21+00 22+00 23+00 24+00Transducer 1 Crest Gauge Existing Condition Plan ViewTributaries of Wicker Branch Stream RestorationUnion County, NCDMS Project No. 95022010050Scale in FeetFIGURE3bYear 5 Conditions Sta tioning Photo Locations Crest Gauge Tran sducer Enchroachment Vegetation Plots Cr iteria Met Cr iteria Not Met As sets No Credit Restoration Enhan cement I Enhan cement II LegendUnimproved RoadCulvertCross SectionsEquipment CrossingLog SillLevel SpreaderStreamEasement BoundaryExisting Wetlands Tributary 3 Tributary 4 XS-9 XS-11 XS-1 XS-3 Honeysuckle treated and removed V P - 5 VP - 9 VP - 6 V P - 8 VP - 7 VP - 11 VP - 10 XS-8 XS-12 XS-2 XS-10 PhotoMonitoringPoint 3 PhotoMonitoringPoint 5 PhotoMonitoringPoint 4 1+00 2+00 3+00 4+00 5+00 6+00 7+00 0+00 1+00 2+00 3+00 4+00 5+00 6+00 0+00 Tr ansducer 3 Tr ansducer 4 Crest Gauge Existing Condition Plan ViewTributaries of Wicker Branch Stream RestorationUnion County, NCDMS Project No. 95022010050Scale in FeetFIGURE3cYear 5 Conditions Sta tioning Photo Locations Crest Gauge Tran sducer Enchroachment Vegetation Plots Cr iteria Met Cr iteria Not Met As sets No Credit Restoration Enhan cement I Enhan cement II LegendUnimproved RoadCulvertCross SectionsEquipment CrossingLog SillLevel SpreaderStreamEasement BoundaryExisting Wetlands Reach ID Tributary 1Assessed Length 24851. Bed 1. Vertical Stability (Riffle and Run units)1. Aggradation - Bar formation/growth sufficient to significantly deflect flow laterally (not to include point bars)0 0 100%2. Degradation - Evidence of downcutting0 0 100%2. Riffle Condition1. Texture/Substrate - Riffle maintains coarser substrate50 50 100%3. Meander Pool Condition1. Depth Sufficient (Max Pool Depth : Mean Bankfull Depth > 1.6)49 49 100%2. Length appropriate (>30% of centerline distance between tail of upstream riffle and head of downstrem riffle)49 49 100%4.Thalweg Position1. Thalweg centering at upstream of meander bend (Run)50 50 100%2. Thalweg centering at downstream of meander (Glide)50 50 100%2. Bank 1. Scoured/ErodingBank lacking vegetative cover resulting simply from poor growth and/or scour and erosion0 0 100% 0 0 100%2. UndercutBanks undercut/overhanging to the extent that mass wasting appears likely. Does NOT include undercuts that are modest, appear sustainable and are providing habitat.0 0 100% 0 0 100%3. Mass WastingBank slumping, calving, or collapse0 0 100% 0 0 100%0 0 100% 0 0 100%3. Engineered Structures1. Overall IntegrityStructures physically intact with no dislodged boulders or logs.32 33 97%2. Grade ControlGrade control structures exhibiting maintenance of grade across the sill. 33 33 100%2a. PipingStructures lacking any substantial flow underneath sills or arms.33 33 100%3. Bank ProtectionBank erosion within the structures extent of influence does not exceed 15%. (See guidance for this table in EEP monitoring guidance document) 33 33 100%4. HabitatPool forming structures maintaining ~ Max Pool Depth : Mean Bankfull Depth ratio > 1.6 Rootwads/logs providing some cover at base-flow.33 33 100%Table 5. Visual Stream Morphology Stability AssessmentTributaries of Wicker Branch Stream Restoration/ DMS No. 95022Major Channel CategoryChannel Sub-Category MetricNumber Stable, Performing as IntendedTotals% Stable, Performing as IntendedTotal Number in As-builtAdjusted % for Stabilizing Woody VegetationNumber of Unstable SegmentsNumber with Stabilizing Woody VegetationFootage with Stabilizing Woody VegetationAmount of Unstable Footage Reach ID Tributary 3Assessed Length 9041. Bed 1. Vertical Stability (Riffle and Run units)1. Aggradation - Bar formation/growth sufficient to significantly deflect flow laterally (not to include point bars)0 0 100%2. Degradation - Evidence of downcutting0 0 100%2. Riffle Condition1. Texture/Substrate - Riffle maintains coarser substrate12 12 100%3. Meander Pool Condition1. Depth Sufficient (Max Pool Depth : Mean Bankfull Depth > 1.6)12 12 100%2. Length appropriate (>30% of centerline distance between tail of upstream riffle and head of downstrem riffle)12 12 100%4.Thalweg Position1. Thalweg centering at upstream of meander bend (Run)12 12 100%2. Thalweg centering at downstream of meander (Glide)12 12 100%2. Bank 1. Scoured/ErodingBank lacking vegetative cover resulting simply from poor growth and/or scour and erosion0 0 100% 0 0 100%2. UndercutBanks undercut/overhanging to the extent that mass wasting appears likely. Does NOT include undercuts that are modest, appear sustainable and are providing habitat.0 0 100% 0 0 100%3. Mass WastingBank slumping, calving, or collapse0 0 100% 0 0 100%0 0 100% 0 0 100%3. Engineered Structures1. Overall IntegrityStructures physically intact with no dislodged boulders or logs.13 13 100%2. Grade ControlGrade control structures exhibiting maintenance of grade across the sill. 13 13 100%2a. PipingStructures lacking any substantial flow underneath sills or arms.13 13 100%3. Bank ProtectionBank erosion within the structures extent of influence does not exceed 15%. (See guidance for this table in EEP monitoring guidance document) 13 13 100%4. HabitatPool forming structures maintaining ~ Max Pool Depth : Mean Bankfull Depth ratio > 1.6 Rootwads/logs providing some cover at base-flow.13 13 100%Major Channel CategoryTable 5. Visual Stream Morphology Stability AssessmentTributaries of Wicker Branch Stream Restoration/ DMS No. 95022Number with Stabilizing Woody VegetationFootage with Stabilizing Woody VegetationAdjusted % for Stabilizing Woody VegetationNumber Stable, Performing as IntendedChannel Sub-CategoryNumber of Unstable SegmentsTotal Number in As-builtTotalsAmount of Unstable Footage% Stable, Performing as IntendedMetric Reach ID Tributary 4Assessed Length 6301. Bed 1. Vertical Stability (Riffle and Run units)1. Aggradation - Bar formation/growth sufficient to significantly deflect flow laterally (not to include point bars)0 0 100%2. Degradation - Evidence of downcutting0 0 100%2. Riffle Condition1. Texture/Substrate - Riffle maintains coarser substrate4 4 100%3. Meander Pool Condition1. Depth Sufficient (Max Pool Depth : Mean Bankfull Depth > 1.6)4 4 100%2. Length appropriate (>30% of centerline distance between tail of upstream riffle and head of downstrem riffle)4 4 100%4.Thalweg Position1. Thalweg centering at upstream of meander bend (Run)4 4 100%2. Thalweg centering at downstream of meander (Glide)4 4 100%2. Bank 1. Scoured/ErodingBank lacking vegetative cover resulting simply from poor growth and/or scour and erosion0 0 100% 0 0 100%2. UndercutBanks undercut/overhanging to the extent that mass wasting appears likely. Does NOT include undercuts that are modest, appear sustainable and are providing habitat.0 0 100% 0 0 100%3. Mass WastingBank slumping, calving, or collapse0 0 100% 0 0 100%0 0 100% 0 0 100%3. Engineered Structures1. Overall IntegrityStructures physically intact with no dislodged boulders or logs.4 4 100%2. Grade ControlGrade control structures exhibiting maintenance of grade across the sill. 4 4 100%2a. PipingStructures lacking any substantial flow underneath sills or arms.4 4 100%3. Bank ProtectionBank erosion within the structures extent of influence does not exceed 15%. (See guidance for this table in EEP monitoring guidance document) 4 4 100%4. HabitatPool forming structures maintaining ~ Max Pool Depth : Mean Bankfull Depth ratio > 1.6 Rootwads/logs providing some cover at base-flow.4 4 100%Number of Unstable SegmentsNumber with Stabilizing Woody VegetationFootage with Stabilizing Woody VegetationAmount of Unstable FootageTotals% Stable, Performing as IntendedTotal Number in As-builtAdjusted % for Stabilizing Woody VegetationTable 5. Visual Stream Morphology Stability AssessmentTributaries of Wicker Branch Stream Restoration/ DMS No. 95022Major Channel CategoryChannel Sub-Category MetricNumber Stable, Performing as Intended Planted Acreage 11.57Vegetation Category DefinitionsMapping ThresholdCCPV DepictionNumber of PolygonsCombined Acreage% of Planted Area1. Bare AreasVery limited cover of both woody and herbaceous material. 0.1 acresBeige dot pattern0 0.00 0.0%2. Low Stem Density AreasWoody stem densities clearly below target levels based on MY3, 4, or 5 stem count criteria. 0.1 acres Red Hatch 0 0.00 0.0%0 0.00 0.0%3. Areas of Poor Growth Rates or VigorAreas with woody stems of a size class that are obviously small given the monitoring year. 0.25 acres N/A 0 0.00 0.0%0 0.00 0.0%Easement Acreage215.494. Invasive Areas of Concern4Presence of Chinese privet and honeysuckle 1000 SF Yellow Hatch 0 0.00 0.0%5. Easement Encroachment Areas3Areas or points (if too small to render as polygons at map scale). none Green Hatch 1 0.03 0.2%Number of PolygonsCombined Acreage% of Easement AcreageTable 6. Vegetation Condition AssessmentTributaries of Wicker Branch Stream Restoration/ DMS No. 95022TotalCumulative TotalVegetation Category DefinitionsMapping ThresholdCCPV Depiction1= Enter the planted acreage within the easement. This number is calculatedas the easement acreage minus any existing mature tree stands that were notsubject to supplemental planting of theunderstory, the channel acreage, crossings or any other elements not directly planted as part of the project effort.2= The acreage within the easement boundaries.3= Encroachment may occur within or outside of planted areas and will there25fore be calculated against the overall easement acreage. In the event a polygon is cataloged into items 1, 2 or 3 in the tableand is the result of encroachment, the associated acreage should be tallied in the relevant item (i.e., item 1,2 or 3) as well as a parallel tally in item5.4= Invasives may occur in or out of planted areas, but still within the easement and will therefore be calculated against the overall easement acreage.Invasives of concern/interest are listed below. The listof high concern spcies are those with the potential to directly outcompetenative, young, woody stems in the short-term (e.g. monitoring period or shortly thereafter) or affect the community structure forexisting, more established tree/shrub stands over timeframes that are slightly longer (e.g. 1-2 decades). The low/moderate concern group are those species that generally do not have this capacity over thetimeframes discussed and therefore are not expected to be mapped with regularity, but can be mapped, if in the judgement of the observer their coverage, density or distribution is suppressing the viability,density, or growth of planted woody stems. Decisions as to whether remediation will be needed are based on the integration of risk factors by EEP such as species present, their coverage, distributionrelative to native biomass, and the practicality of treatment. For example, even modest amounts of Kudzu or Japanese Knotweed early in the projects history will warrant control, but potentially largecoverages of Microstegium in the herb layer will not likley trigger control because of the limited capacities to impact tree/shrub layers within thetimeframes discussed and the potential impacts of treatingextensive amounts of ground cover. Those species with the "watch list" designator in gray shade are of interest as well, but have yet to be observed across the state with any frequency. Those inred italicsare of particular interest given their extreme risk/threat level for mapping as points where isolated specimens are found, particularly ealry in a projects monitoring history. However, areas of discreet, densepatches will of course be mapped as polygons. The symbology scheme below was one that was found to be helpful for symbolzing invasives polygons, particulalry for situations where the conditon for anarea is somewhere between isolated specimens and dense, discreet patches. In any case, the point or polygon/area feature can be symbolized to describe things like high or low concern and species canbe listed as a map inset, in legend items if the number of species are limitedor in the narrative section of the executive summary. Tributaries to Wickers Branch Stream Restoration Site Year 5 (2019) Monitoring Report DMS Project No. 95022 Vegetation Monitoring Plot 1 – 11/14/2019 Vegetation Monitoring Plot 2 – 11/14/2019 Vegetation Monitoring Plot 3 – 11/14/2019 Vegetation Monitoring Plot 4 – 11/14/2019 Vegetation Monitoring Plot 5 – 11/13/2019 Vegetation Monitoring Plot 6 – 11/14/2019 Tributaries to Wickers Branch Stream Restoration Site Year 5 (2019) Monitoring Report DMS Project No. 95022 Vegetation Monitoring Plot 7 – 11/13/2019 Vegetation Monitoring Plot 8 – 11/14/2019 Vegetation Monitoring Plot 9 – 11/14/2019 Vegetation Monitoring Plot 10 – 11/14/2019 Vegetation Monitoring Plot 11 – 11/14/2019 Tributaries to Wickers Branch Stream Restoration Site Year 5 (2019) Monitoring Report DMS Project No. 95022 Cross Section 1 (looking upstream) – 11/13/19 Cross Section 2 (looking upstream) – 11/13/19 Cross Section 3 (looking upstream) – 11/13/19 Cross Section 4 (looking upstream) – 11/13/19 Cross Section 5 (looking upstream) – 11/13/19 Cross Section 6 (looking upstream) – 11/13/19 Tributaries to Wickers Branch Stream Restoration Site Year 5 (2019) Monitoring Report DMS Project No. 95022 Cross Section 7 (looking upstream) – 11/14/19 Cross Section 8 (looking upstream) – 11/14/19 Cross Section 9 (looking upstream) – 11/14/19 Cross Section 10 (looking upstream) – 11/14/19 Cross Section 11 (looking upstream) – 11/14/19 Cross Section 12 (looking upstream) – 11/14/19 Tributaries to Wickers Branch Stream Restoration Site Year 5 (2019) Monitoring Report DMS Project No. 95022 Photo Monitoring Point 1 – 11/14/19 Photo Monitoring Point 3 – 11/14/19 Photo Monitoring Point 5 – 11/14/19 Photo Monitoring Point 2 – 11/14/19 Photo Monitoring Point 4 – 11/13/19 Photo Monitoring Point 6 – 11/14/19 Tributaries to Wickers Branch Stream Restoration Site Year 5 (2019) Monitoring Report DMS Project No. 95022 Repair of log sill erosion on lower portion of Tributary 1B Tributaries to Wickers Branch Stream Restoration Site Year 5 (2019) Monitoring Report DMS Project No. 95022 APPENDIX C: VEGETATION PLOT DATA Table 7: Vegetation Plot Counts and Densities Table 7. Vegetation Plot Stem Count SummaryEEP Project Code 95022.  Project Name: Tributaries to Wicker BranchPnoLS P‐all T PnoLS P‐all T PnoLS P‐all T PnoLS P‐all T PnoLS P‐all T PnoLS P‐all T PnoLS P‐all T PnoLS P‐all T PnoLS P‐all TAcer negundo boxelder TreeAcer rubrum red maple Tree888Carya hickory TreeCeltis laevigata sugarberry TreeCeltis occidentalis common hackberry TreeCercis canadensis eastern redbud Tree111222333444223 333111333Cornus alternifolia alternateleaf dogwood TreeCornus amomum silky dogwood Shrub 4 4 4225222 222111Diospyros virginiana common persimmon Tree111111111333Juniperus virginiana eastern redcedar Tree 11Liquidambar styraciflua sweetgum Tree111362Liriodendron tulipifera tuliptree Tree111111 222444 111 222Pinus taeda loblolly pine Tree 4 1Platanus occidentalis American sycamore Tree1Populus deltoides eastern cottonwood Tree2Prunus serotina black cherry TreeQuercus oak TreeQuercus alba white oak Tree333333222111444444777444222Quercus falcata southern red oak Tree 4 4 4111111 222Rhus copallinum flameleaf sumac shrubRhus glabra smooth sumac shrubRobinia pseudoacacia black locust Tree1111114 10111444 111Salix nigra black willow Tree11Sambucus canadensis Common Elderberry Shrub555333333111Ulmus alata winged elm Tree 1 3Ulmus americana American elm Tree 2 1Ulmus rubra slippery elm TreeUnknown Shrub or Tree202027111127 9 912 91020131330 6 616171717121223 8 8168812668447458557335555669445809.4 809.4 1093 445.2 445.2 1093 364.2 364.2 485.6 364.2 404.7 809.4 526.1526.1 1214 242.8 242.8 647.5 688 688 688 485.6 485.6 930.8 323.7 323.7 647.5PnoLS P‐all T PnoLS P‐all T PnoLS P‐all T PnoLS P‐all T PnoLS P‐all T PnoLS P‐all T PnoLS P‐all T PnoLS P‐all TAcer negundo boxelder Tree153Acer rubrum red maple Tree 24 17Carya hickory Tree111111113Celtis laevigata sugarberry Tree1Celtis occidentalis common hackberry Tree41Cercis canadensis eastern redbud Tree222112222224232324232323222225212121262626Cornus alternifolia alternateleaf dogwood Tree2Cornus amomum silky dogwood Shrub 1 1 1 12 12 15 10 10 10 10 10 10 11 11 12 18 18 18212121Diospyros virginiana common persimmon Tree1137796676667710666777Juniperus virginiana eastern redcedar Tree 2 1Liquidambar styraciflua sweetgum Tree 4 9 27 17 13Liriodendron tulipifera tuliptree Tree 1 1 1 12 12 12 11 11 11 13 13 13 16 16 1816 16 16 38 38 38Pinus taeda loblolly pine Tree 1 6 2 2Platanus occidentalis American sycamore Tree 1 1Populus deltoides eastern cottonwood Tree 2 2 1Prunus serotina black cherry Tree1Quercus oak Tree111222Quercus alba white oak Tree111333343434343434343434353536262626414141Quercus falcata southern red oak Tree8887777779911101010202020Rhus copallinum flameleaf sumac shrub1Rhus glabra smooth sumac shrub61Robinia pseudoacacia black locust Tree 1 1 3 5 9 9 40 9 9 139998814777999Salix nigra black willow Tree 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 4 1 1 1 1Sambucus canadensis Common Elderberry Shrub222222161616161616161616181821151515212121Ulmus alata winged elm Tree 1 5 2Ulmus americana American elm Tree 3Ulmus rubra slippery elm Tree82Unknown Shrub or Tree1111111111116 6 13 10 10 28 121 122 230 117 118 188 119 120 129 127 128 175 121 122 122 186 187 187446771091018910229101491017101111101111242.8 242.8 526.1 404.7 404.7 1133 445.2 448.8 846.2 430.4 434.1 691.6 437.8 441.5 474.6 467.2 470.9 643.8 445.2 448.8 448.8 684.3 688 688Color for DensityExceeds requirements by 10%Exceeds requirements, but by less than 10%Fails to meet requirements, by less than 10%95022‐01‐0007 95022‐01‐0008 95022‐01‐0009Scientific Name Common Name Species Type95022‐01‐0001 95022‐01‐0002 95022‐01‐0003 95022‐01‐0004 95022‐01‐0005 95022‐01‐0006Species count10.0210.020.0210.02Stem countsize (ares)size (ACRES)Annual MeansScientific Name Common Name Species Type10.0210.0210.0210.02Stems per ACRE10.021MY2 (2016) MY1 (2015) MY0 (2015)95022‐01‐0010 95022‐01‐0011Stem countsize (ares)MY5 (2019) MY4 (2018) MY3 (2017)Current Plot Data (MY5 2019)Current Plot Data (MY5 2019)0.02 0.02 0.27 0.27 0.2711size (ACRES)1 111111111110.27 0.27 0.27Species countStems per ACRE Tributaries to Wickers Branch Stream Restoration Site Year 5 (2019) Monitoring Report DMS Project No. 95022 APPENDIX D: STREAM GEOMORPHOLOGY DATA Cross-Sections Longitudinal Profiles Pebble Counts Table 8: Baseline Stream Data Summary Table 9a: Cross-Section Morphology Data Table 9b: Stream Reach Morphology Data Cross‐section Plot ExhibitRiver BasinYadkin‐Pee DeeWatershedWicker BranchX‐Sec IDXS‐1,  Sta. 4+65FeatureRiffleDrainage Area (sq mi)0.15Date11/13/2019Field CrewRon JohnsonStation Elevation Summary Data0 578.29 LBPINBankfull Elevation 577.71.99 577.86 GRBankfull Width (ft) 4.336.21 577.52 GRFloodprone Width (ft) 5011.4 577.59 GRBankfull Mean Depth (ft) 0.3515.3 577.61 GRBankfull Max Depth (ft) 0.5518.2 577.75 TOBBankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft2)1.5118.81 577.30 TOEBankfull Width/Depth Ratio 12.3720 577.15 TWBankfull Entrenchment Ratio 11.521.2 577.16 TOELow Top of Bank Depth (ft) 0.46Photo: Cross‐section 1 looking upstream21.68 577.61 TOBBankfull Bank Height Ratio 0.8323.25 577.74 GR26.99 577.57 GR30.77 577.53 GR35.6 577.86 GR39.69 578.05 GR39.88 578.05 RBPIN577577.5578578.55790 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45Elevation (ft)Distance (ft)Tributaries of Wicker BranchTributary 1, XS‐1BankfullFloodprone AreaAsbuiltY1Y2Y3Y4Y5 Cross‐section Plot ExhibitRiver BasinYadkin‐Pee DeeWatershedWicker BranchX‐Sec IDXS‐2,  Sta. 5+05FeaturePoolDrainage Area (sq mi)0.15Date11/13/2019Field CrewRon JohnsonStation Elevation Summary Data0 577.97 LBPINBankfull Elevation 577.031.44 577.56 GRBankfull Width (ft) 6.16.52 576.93 GRFloodprone Width (ft) 5010.58 577.10 GRBankfull Mean Depth (ft) 0.6514.51 577.14 GRBankfull Max Depth (ft) 1.417.73 577.13 TOBBankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft2)3.9818.26 576.92 TOEBankfull Entrenchment Ratio 9.418.9 576.06Low Top of Bank Depth (ft) 8.220.08 575.63 TWLow Top of Bank Depth (ft) 1.26Photo: Cross‐section 2 looking upstream20.89 575.69Bankfull Bank Height Ratio 0.921.47 576.31 TOE22.2 576.89 TOB23.97 576.97 GR26.42 576.88 GR29.4 577.02 GR33.56 576.89 GR38.13 577.29 GR39.65 577.45 RBPIN575575.5576576.5577577.5578578.55790 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45Elevation (ft)Distance (ft)BankfullFloodprone AreaAsbuiltY1Y2Y3Y4Y5Tributaries of Wicker BranchTributary 1, XS‐2 Cross‐section Plot ExhibitRiver BasinYadkin‐Pee DeeWatershedWicker BranchX‐Sec IDXS‐3,  Sta. 9+34FeatureRiffleDrainage Area (sq mi)0.15Date11/13/2019Field CrewRon JohnsonStation Elevation Summary Data0.16 572.15 LBPINBankfull Elevation 571.732.04 572.03 GRBankfull Width (ft) 9.95.31 571.58 GRFloodprone Width (ft) 508.55 571.17 GRBankfull Mean Depth (ft) 0.3112.3 571.43 GRBankfull Max Depth (ft) 0.8616.76 571.68 GRBankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft2)3.0818.02 571.64 TOBBankfull Width/Depth Ratio 32.0318.67 571.25Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio 519.08 570.87 TWLow Top of Bank Depth (ft) 0.82Photo: Cross‐section 3 looking upstream19.83 570.90Bankfull Bank Height Ratio 0.9520.59 570.9221.07 571.28 TOE21.26 571.64 TOB22.34 571.78 GR24.57 571.77 GR28.24 571.67 GR32.19 571.64 GR35.97 571.89 GR38.76 571.97 RBPIN570570.5571571.5572572.55730 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45Elevation (ft)Distance (ft)BankfullFloodprone AreaAsbuiltY1Y2Y3Y4Y5Tributaries of Wicker BranchTributary 1, XS‐3 Cross‐section Plot ExhibitRiver BasinYadkin‐Pee DeeWatershedWicker BranchX‐Sec IDXS‐4,  Sta. 9+72FeaturePoolDrainage Area (sq mi)0.15Date11/13/2019Field CrewRon JohnsonStation Elevation Summary Data0.04 571.80 LBPINBankfull Elevation 571.170.68 571.73 GRBankfull Width (ft) 9.64.46 571.30 GRFloodprone Width (ft) 508.1 571.03 GRBankfull Mean Depth (ft) 0.3511.27 571.25 GRBankfull Max Depth (ft) 1.3512.88 571.10 GRBankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft2)3.7213.72 571.10 TOBBankfull Width/Depth Ratio 27.414.77 570.10 TOEBankfull Entrenchment Ratio 5.215.26 569.97Low Top of Bank Depth (ft) 1.25Photo: Cross‐section 4 looking upstream16 569.85 TWBankfull Bank Height Ratio 0.9216.5 570.49 TOE16.9 571.17 TOB17.97 571.21 GR21.98 571.11 GR26.33 571.23 GR31.96 571.18 GR36.13 571.27 GR38.79 571.45 GR39.78 571.61 RBPIN569.5570570.5571571.5572572.55730 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45Elevation (ft)Distance (ft)BankfullFloodprone AreaAsbuiltY1Y2Y3Y4Y5Tributaries of Wicker BranchTributary 1, XS‐4 Cross‐section Plot ExhibitRiver BasinYadkin‐Pee DeeWatershedWicker BranchX‐Sec IDXS‐5, Sta. 12+10FeatureRiffleDrainage Area (sq mi)0.15Date11/13/2019Field CrewRon JohnsonStation Elevation Summary Data0.02 568.88 LBPINBankfull Elevation 568.320.05 568.85 GRBankfull Width (ft) 4.21.82 568.64 GRFloodprone Width (ft) 504.53 568.44 GRBankfull Mean Depth (ft) 0.388.4 568.25 GRBankfull Max Depth (ft) 0.5512.36 568.15 GRBankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft2)1.5414.11 568.26 GRBankfull Width/Depth Ratio 10.9516.06 568.35 GRBankfull Entrenchment Ratio 1216.87 568.40 TOBLow Top of Bank Depth (ft) 0.58Photo: Cross‐section 5 looking upstream17.53 568.21Bankfull Bank Height Ratio 1.0518.06 567.88 TOE18.45 567.8619.27 567.77 TW20.59 567.86 TOE21.3 568.3221.66 568.54 TOB23.32 568.53 GR26.18 568.33 GR28.93 568.21 GR31.93 568.38 GR35.85 568.52 GR38.51 568.65 GR39.85 568.89 RBPIN567.5568568.5569569.55700 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45Elevation (ft)Distance (ft)BankfullFloodprone AreaAsbuiltY1Y2Y3Y4Y5Tributaries of Wicker BranchTributary 1, XS‐5 Cross‐section Plot ExhibitRiver BasinYadkin‐Pee DeeWatershedWicker BranchX‐Sec IDXS‐6, Sta. 12+37FeatureRiffleDrainage Area (sq mi)0.15Date11/13/2019Field CrewRon JohnsonStation Elevation Summary Data0.05 568.15 LBPINBankfull Elevation 567.910.85 568.11 GRBankfull Width (ft) 5.093.06 568.08 GRFloodprone Width (ft) 506.31 568.10 GRBankfull Mean Depth (ft) 0.3410.43 568.04 GRBankfull Max Depth (ft) 0.5714.5 567.99 GRBankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft2)1.7217 567.90 GRBankfull Width/Depth Ratio 14.9717.59 567.88 TOBBankfull Entrenchment Ratio 7.8517.92 567.74 TOELow Top of Bank Depth (ft) 0.53Photo: Cross‐section 6 looking uptream18.65 567.45Bankfull Bank Height Ratio 0.9219.6 567.34 TW20.95 567.3721.68 567.85 TOE21.87 568.04 TOB22.82 568.01 GR25.57 567.82 GR28.61 567.78 GR32.42 567.76 GR35.45 568.09 GR38.16 568.61 GR39.51 569.08 RBPIN567567.5568568.5569569.55700 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45Elevation (ft)Distance (ft)BankfullFloodprone AreaAsbuiltY1Y2Y3Y4Y5Tributaries of Wicker BranchTributary 1, XS‐6 Cross‐section Plot ExhibitRiver BasinYadkin‐Pee DeeWatershedWicker BranchX‐Sec IDXS‐7, Sta. 12+72FeaturePoolDrainage Area (sq mi)0.15Date11/14/2019Field CrewRon JohnsonStation Elevation Summary Data0 567.74 LBPINBankfull Elevation 567.391.56 567.61 GRBankfull Width (ft) 5.535.42 567.44 GRFloodprone Width (ft) 409 567.15 GRBankfull Mean Depth (ft) 0.5814.66 567.29 GRBankfull Max Depth (ft) 0.9319.67 567.50 GRBankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft2)3.2123.65 567.61 GRBankfull Width/Depth Ratio 9.5324.41 567.48 TOBBankfull Entrenchment Ratio 7.225.15 566.98Low Top of Bank Depth (ft) 0.94Photo: Cross‐section 7 looking upstream26.04 566.60 TOEBankfull Bank Height Ratio 1.0126.51 566.4927.17 566.46 TW28.14 566.55 TOE29.15 567.1230.38 567.40 TOB32.69 567.55 GR35.68 567.62 GR36.9 567.72 GR39.04 568.28 GR39.8 568.53 RBPIN566566.5567567.5568568.5569569.50 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45Elevation (ft)Distance (ft)BankfullFloodprone AreaAsbuiltY1Y2Y3Y4Y5Tributaries of Wicker BranchTributary 1, XS‐7 Cross‐section Plot ExhibitRiver BasinYadkin‐Pee DeeWatershedWicker BranchX‐Sec IDXS‐8, Sta. 1+83FeatureRiffleDrainage Area (sq mi)0.05Date11/14/2019Field CrewRon JohnsonStation Elevation Summary Data0 575.27Bankfull Elevation 574.490.43 575.28 GRBankfull Width (ft) 6.74.21 574.91 GRFloodprone Width (ft) 407.51 574.77 GRBankfull Mean Depth (ft) 0.2512.42 574.50 GRBankfull Max Depth (ft) 0.7216.23 574.64 GRBankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft2)1.6618.13 574.37 GRBankfull Width/Depth Ratio 26.819.11 574.39 TOBBankfull Entrenchment Ratio 5.9719.56 574.19 TOELow Top of Bank Depth (ft) 0.67Photo: Cross‐section 8 looking downstream20.15 574.05 TWBankfull Bank Height Ratio 0.9320.6 573.77 TOE21.11 573.82 T0B21.48 574.09 GR22.56 574.37 GR23.13 574.44 GR25.27 574.42 GR29.02 574.54 GR32.55 574.42 GR35.68 574.35 GR38.23 574.88 GR39.45 574.96 RBPIN573573.5574574.5575575.55760 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45Elevation (ft)Distance (ft)BankfullFloodprone AreaAsbuiltY1Y2Y3Y4Y5Tributaries of Wicker BranchTributary 3, XS‐8 Cross‐section Plot ExhibitRiver BasinYadkin‐Pee DeeWatershedWicker BranchX‐Sec IDXS‐9, Sta 3+19FeatureRiffleDrainage Area (sq mi)0.05Date11/14/2019Field CrewRon JohnsonStation Elevation Summary Data0 574.29 LBPINBankfull Elevation 572.651.02 573.48 GRBankfull Width (ft) 3.045.86 573.03 GRFloodprone Width (ft) 3411.31 572.78 GRBankfull Mean Depth (ft) 0.3916.05 572.70 GRBankfull Max Depth (ft) 0.6319.38 572.82 TOBBankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft2)1.1619.45 572.74Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio 7.820 572.36 TOEBankfull Entrenchment Ratio 11.520.41 572.15Low Top of Bank Depth (ft) 0.63Photo: Cross‐section 9 looking upstream21.02 572.02 TWBankfull Bank Height Ratio 121.84 572.18 TOE22.57 572.6523.21 572.71 TOB24.58 572.75 GR27.99 572.62 GR32.55 572.54 GR34.26 572.67 GR37.57 573.23 GR39.94 573.78 RBPIN572572.5573573.5574574.55750 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45Elevation (ft)Distance (ft)BankfullFloodprone AreaAsbuiltY1Y2Y3Y4Y5Tributaries of Wicker BranchTributary 3, XS‐9 Cross‐section Plot ExhibitRiver BasinYadkin‐Pee DeeWatershedWicker BranchX‐Sec IDXS‐10, Sta. 4+95FeaturePoolDrainage Area (sq mi)0.05Date11/14/2019Field CrewRon JohnsonStation Elevation Summary Data0 573.87 LBPINBankfull Elevation 570.951.17 573.53 GRBankfull Width (ft) 113.21 572.97 GRFloodprone Width (ft) 356.42 572.17 GRBankfull Mean Depth (ft) 0.638.44 571.16 GRBankfull Max Depth (ft) 1.5410.58 570.97 GRBankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft2)6.9813.6 570.75 GRBankfull Width/Depth Ratio 17.514.92 570.86 GRBankfull Entrenchment Ratio 3.215.56 570.78 GRLow Top of Bank Depth (ft) 1.45Photo: Cross‐section 10 looking upstream16.04 570.63 TOBBankfull Bank Height Ratio 0.9416.72 570.0417.65 569.63 TOE18.32 569.4819.23 569.41 TW20.42 569.72 TOE21.38 570.6422.22 570.87 TOB23.5 570.85 GR26.08 570.84 GR28.74 570.76 GR33.64 571.04 GR36.74 571.53 GR39.54 572.08 GR40.64 572.31 RBPIN569569.5570570.5571571.5572572.5573573.55740 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45Elevation (ft)Distance (ft)BankfullFloodprone AreaAsbuiltY1Y2Y3Y4Y5Tributaries of Wicker BranchTributary 3, XS‐10 Cross‐section Plot ExhibitRiver BasinYadkin‐Pee DeeWatershedWicker BranchX‐Sec IDXS‐11, Sta. 3+61FeatureRiffleDrainage Area (sq mi)0.05Date11/14/2019Field CrewRon JohnsonStation Elevation Summary Data0 576.13 LBPINBankfull Elevation 574.780.96 576.12 GRBankfull Width (ft) 3.234.19 576.00 GRFloodprone Width (ft) 187.29 575.84 GRBankfull Mean Depth (ft) 0.3812.69 575.39 GRBankfull Max Depth (ft) 0.6116.08 575.09 GRBankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft2)1.2117.96 574.85 GRBankfull Width/Depth Ratio 8.518.5 574.73 TOBBankfull Entrenchment Ratio 5.718.86 574.61Low Top of Bank Depth (ft) 0.56Photo: Cross‐section 11 looking upstream19.19 574.25Bankfull Bank Height Ratio 0.9119.97 574.17 TW20.62 574.1921.3 574.73 TOB21.83 574.91 GR23.71 574.94 GR28.36 575.16 GR33.56 575.57 GR37.66 575.79 GR39.63 575.92 RBPIN573.5574574.5575575.5576576.55770 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45Elevation (ft)Distance (ft)BankfullFloodprone AreaAsbuiltY1Y2Y3Y4Y5Tributaries of Wicker BranchTributary 4, XS‐11 Cross‐section Plot ExhibitRiver BasinYadkin‐Pee DeeWatershedWicker BranchX‐Sec IDXS‐12, Sta. 6+42FeatureRiffleDrainage Area (sq mi)0.05Date11/14/2019Field CrewRon JohnsonStation Elevation Summary Data0 572.72 LBPINBankfull Elevation 572.091.66 572.60 GRBankfull Width (ft) 3.185.45 572.69 GRFloodprone Width (ft) 239.71 572.60 GRBankfull Mean Depth (ft) 0.3914.7 572.56 GRBankfull Max Depth (ft) 0.5717.6 572.31 GRBankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft2)1.2318.33 572.26 TOBBankfull Width/Depth Ratio 8.1518.78 571.93Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio 7.219.24 571.71Low Top of Bank Depth (ft) 0.64Photo: Cross‐section 12 looking upstream19.63 571.58Bankfull Bank Height Ratio 1.120.5 571.52 TW21.16 571.6621.85 572.17 TOB23.53 572.41 GR27.3 572.72 GR32.77 573.05 GR37.3 573.58 GR40 573.91 RBPIN571571.5572572.5573573.5574574.55750 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45Elevation (ft)Distance (ft)Tributaries of Wicker BranchTributary 4, XS‐12BankfullFloodprone AreaAsbuiltY1Y2Y3Y4Y5 564.00566.00568.00570.00572.00574.00576.00578.007+00 8+00 9+00 10+00 11+00 12+00 13+00 14+00Elevation (ft)Station (ft)Tributaries of Wicker Branch - Tributary 1A Longitudinal ProfileBKFAsbuilt TWY1 TWY2 TWY3 TWY4 TWY5 TWCross Section 3Cross Section 4Cross Section 5Cross Section 6Cross Section 7572.00574.00576.00578.00580.00582.00584.00586.00588.00+ 1+00 2+00 3+00 4+00 5+00 6+00 7+00Elevation (ft)Station (ft)Tributaries of Wicker Branch - Tributary 1A Longitudinal ProfileBKFAsbuilt TWY1 TWY2 TWY3 TWY4 TWY5 TWCross Section 2Cross Section 1Cross Section 7 5685705725745765782+00 3+00 4+00 5+00 6+00 7+00 8+00Elevation (ft)Station (ft)Tributaries of Wicker Branch - Tributary 4 Longitudinal ProfileBKFAsbuilt TWY1 TWY2 TWY3 TWY4 TWY5 TWCross Section 7566568570572574576578+ 1+00 2+00 3+00 4+00 5+00 6+00 7+00Elevation (ft)Station (ft)Tributaries of Wicker Branch -Tributary 3 Longitudinal ProfileBKFAsbuilt TWY1 TWY2 TWY3 TWY4 TWY5 TWCross Section 9Cross Section 8Cross Section 10Cross Section 11Cross Section 12 Cross ‐ Section Pebble CountProject Name :  Tributaries of Wickers BranchCross Section: 1Feature: RiffleDescription Particle Millimeter Total # Item % Cum %S/CSilt/Clay < 0.062 8 11% 11%SVery Fine .062 ‐ .125 0 0% 11%AFine .125 ‐ .25 0 0% 11%NMedium .25 ‐ .50 1 1% 13%DCoarse .50 ‐ 1.0 2 3% 16%SVery Coarse 1.0 ‐ 2.0 2 3% 19%Very Fine 2.0 ‐ 4.0 2 3% 21%GFine 4.0 ‐ 5.7 3 4% 26%RFine 5.7 ‐ 8.0 3 4% 30%AMedium 8.0 ‐ 11.3 2 3% 33%VMedium 11.3 ‐ 16.07 10% 43%ECoarse 16.0 ‐ 22.6 9 13% 56%LCoarse 22.6 ‐ 32.010 14% 70%SVery Coarse 32.0 ‐ 45.012 17% 87%Very Coarse 45.0 ‐ 64.05 7% 94%CSmall 64 ‐ 90 4 6% 100%OSmall 90 ‐ 128 0 0% 100%BLarge 128 ‐ 180 0 0% 100%LLarge 180 ‐ 256 0 0% 100%BSmall 256 ‐ 362 0 0% 100%LSmall 362 ‐ 512 0 0% 100%DMedium 512 ‐ 10240 0% 100%RLrg‐ Very Lrg 1024 ‐ 20480 0% 100%BDRKBedrock 0 0% 100%Totals70100%Summary DataD50 19.7D84 43D95 670%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%100%0.01 0.1 1 10 100 1000 10000% Cumulative (finer than)Particle Size (mm)X-Sec 1Particle Size DistributionTributary 1 - Tributaries of Wicker Branch - Union County, NCAsbuiltY1Y2Y3y4Y50%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%100%0.01 0.125 0.25 0.5 1 2 4 6 8 11 16 22 32 45 64 90 128 180 256 362 512 1024 2048Individual Class PercentParticle Size (mm)X-Sec 1Particle Size DistributionTributary 1 - Tributaries of Wicker Branch - Union County, NCAsbuiltY1Y2Y3Y4Y5 Cross ‐ Section Pebble CountProject Name :  Tributaries of Wickers BranchCross Section: 2Feature: PoolDescription Particle Millimeter Total # Item % Cum %S/CSilt/Clay < 0.062 10 14% 14%SVery Fine .062 ‐ .125 3 4% 19%AFine .125 ‐ .25 0 0% 19%NMedium .25 ‐ .50 0 0% 19%DCoarse .50 ‐ 1.0 3 4% 23%SVery Coarse 1.0 ‐ 2.0 3 4% 27%Very Fine 2.0 ‐ 4.0 8 11% 39%GFine 4.0 ‐ 5.7 3 4% 43%RFine 5.7 ‐ 8.0 11 16% 59%AMedium 8.0 ‐ 11.3 7 10% 69%VMedium 11.3 ‐ 16.014 20% 89%ECoarse 16.0 ‐ 22.6 0 0% 89%LCoarse 22.6 ‐ 32.01 1% 90%SVery Coarse 32.0 ‐ 45.07 10% 100%Very Coarse 45.0 ‐ 64.00 0% 100%CSmall 64 ‐ 90 0 0% 100%OSmall 90 ‐ 128 0 0% 100%BLarge 128 ‐ 180 0 0% 100%LLarge 180 ‐ 256 0 0% 100%BSmall 256 ‐ 362 0 0% 100%LSmall 362 ‐ 512 0 0% 100%DMedium 512 ‐ 10240 0% 100%RLrg‐ Very Lrg 1024 ‐ 20480 0% 100%BDRKBedrock 0 0% 100%Totals70100%Summary DataD50 6.75D84 15D95 390%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%100%0.01 0.1 1 10 100 1000 10000% Cumulative (finer than)Particle Size (mm)X-Sec 2Particle Size DistributionTributary 1 - Tributaries of Wicker Branch - Union County, NCAsbuiltY1Y2Y3Y4Y50%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%100%0.01 0.125 0.25 0.5 1 2 4 6 8 11 16 22 32 45 64 90 128 180 256 362 512 1024 2048Individual Class PercentParticle Size (mm)X-Sec 2Particle Size DistributionTributary 1 - Tributaries of Wicker Branch - Union County, NCAsbuiltY1Y2Y3Y4Y5 Cross ‐ Section Pebble CountProject Name :  Tributaries of Wickers BranchCross Section: 3Feature: RiffleDescription Particle Millimeter Total # Item % Cum %S/CSilt/Clay < 0.062 46% 6%SVery Fine .062 ‐ .125 11% 7%AFine .125 ‐ .25 00% 7%NMedium .25 ‐ .50 00% 7%DCoarse .50 ‐ 1.0 00% 7%SVery Coarse 1.0 ‐ 2.0 11% 9%Very Fine 2.0 ‐ 4.0 11% 10%GFine 4.0 ‐ 5.7 11% 11%RFine 5.7 ‐ 8.0 11% 13%AMedium 8.0 ‐ 11.3 11% 14%VMedium 11.3 ‐ 16.069% 23%ECoarse 16.0 ‐ 22.6 11% 24%LCoarse 22.6 ‐ 32.034% 29%SVery Coarse 32.0 ‐ 45.046% 34%Very Coarse 45.0 ‐ 64.01116% 50%CSmall 64 ‐ 90 1319% 69%OSmall 90 ‐ 128 1116% 84%BLarge 128 ‐ 180 1014% 99%LLarge 180 ‐ 256 11% 100%BSmall 256 ‐ 362 00% 100%LSmall 362 ‐ 512 00% 100%DMedium 512 ‐ 102400% 100%RLrg‐ Very Lrg 1024 ‐ 204800% 100%BDRKBedrock 00% 100%Totals70100%Summary DataD50 64D84 127D95 1670%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%100%0.01 0.1 1 10 100 1000 10000% Cumulative (finer than)Particle Size (mm)X-Sec 3Particle Size DistributionTributary 1 - Tributaries of Wicker Branch - Union County, NCAsbuiltY1Y2Y3Y4Y50%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%100%0.01 0.125 0.25 0.5 1 2 4 6 8 11 16 22 32 45 64 90 128 180 256 362 512 1024 2048Individual Class PercentParticle Size (mm)X-Sec 3Particle Size DistributionTributary 1 - Tributaries of Wicker Branch - Union County, NCAsbuiltY1Y2Y3Y4Y5 Cross ‐ Section Pebble CountProject Name :  Tributaries of Wickers BranchCross Section: 4Feature: PoolDescription Particle Millimeter Total # Item % Cum %S/CSilt/Clay < 0.062 3550% 50%SVery Fine .062 ‐ .125 00% 50%AFine .125 ‐ .25 23% 53%NMedium .25 ‐ .50 00% 53%DCoarse .50 ‐ 1.0 00% 53%SVery Coarse 1.0 ‐ 2.0 57% 60%Very Fine 2.0 ‐ 4.0 710% 70%GFine 4.0 ‐ 5.7 23% 73%RFine 5.7 ‐ 8.0 23% 76%AMedium 8.0 ‐ 11.3 23% 79%VMedium 11.3 ‐ 16.023% 81%ECoarse 16.0 ‐ 22.6 11% 83%LCoarse 22.6 ‐ 32.034% 87%SVery Coarse 32.0 ‐ 45.034% 91%Very Coarse 45.0 ‐ 64.023% 94%CSmall 64 ‐ 90 34% 99%OSmall 90 ‐ 128 00% 99%BLarge 128 ‐ 180 11% 100%LLarge 180 ‐ 256 00% 100%BSmall 256 ‐ 362 00% 100%LSmall 362 ‐ 512 00% 100%DMedium 512 ‐ 102400% 100%RLrg‐ Very Lrg 1024 ‐ 204800% 100%BDRKBedrock 00% 100%Totals70100%Summary DataD50 0.06D84 25 35D95 680%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%100%0.01 0.1 1 10 100 1000 10000% Cumulative (finer than)Particle Size (mm)X-Sec 4Particle Size DistributionTributary 1 - Tributaries of Wicker Branch - Union County, NCAsbuiltY1Y2Y3Y4Y50%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%100%0.01 0.125 0.25 0.5 1 2 4 6 8 11 16 22 32 45 64 90 128 180 256 362 512 1024 2048Individual Class PercentParticle Size (mm)X-Sec 4Particle Size DistributionTributary 1 - Tributaries of Wicker Branch - Union County, NCAsbuiltY1Y2Y3Y4Y5 Cross ‐ Section Pebble CountProject Name :  Tributaries of Wickers BranchCross Section: 5Feature: RiffleDescription Particle Millimeter Total # Item % Cum %S/CSilt/Clay < 0.062 5 7% 7%SVery Fine .062 ‐ .125 1 1% 9%AFine .125 ‐ .25 1 1% 10%NMedium .25 ‐ .50 2 3% 13%DCoarse .50 ‐ 1.0 4 6% 19%SVery Coarse 1.0 ‐ 2.0 1 1% 20%Very Fine 2.0 ‐ 4.0 3 4% 24%GFine 4.0 ‐ 5.7 3 4% 29%RFine 5.7 ‐ 8.0 1 1% 30%AMedium 8.0 ‐ 11.3 2 3% 33%VMedium 11.3 ‐ 16.05 7% 40%ECoarse 16.0 ‐ 22.6 4 6% 46%LCoarse 22.6 ‐ 32.08 11% 57%SVery Coarse 32.0 ‐ 45.09 13% 70%Very Coarse 45.0 ‐ 64.013 19% 89%CSmall 64 ‐ 90 5 7% 96%OSmall 90 ‐ 128 3 4% 100%BLarge 128 ‐ 180 0 0% 100%LLarge 180 ‐ 256 0 0% 100%BSmall 256 ‐ 362 0 0% 100%LSmall 362 ‐ 512 0 0% 100%DMedium 512 ‐ 10240 0% 100%RLrg‐ Very Lrg 1024 ‐ 20480 0% 100%BDRKBedrock 0 0% 100%Totals70100%Summary DataD50 16.1D84 59D95 870%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%100%0.01 0.1 1 10 100 1000 10000% Cumulative (finer than)Particle Size (mm)X-Sec 5Particle Size DistributionTributary 1 - Tributaries of Wicker Branch - Union County, NCAsbuiltY1Y2Y3Y4Y50%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%100%0.01 0.125 0.25 0.5 1 2 4 6 8 11 16 22 32 45 64 90 128 180 256 362 512 1024 2048Individual Class PercentParticle Size (mm)X-Sec 5Particle Size DistributionTributary 1 - Tributaries of Wicker Branch - Union County, NCAsbuiltY1Y2Y3Y4Y5 Cross ‐ Section Pebble CountProject Name :  Tributaries of Wickers BranchCross Section: 6Feature: RiffleDescription Particle Millimeter Total # Item % Cum %S/CSilt/Clay < 0.062 16 23% 23%SVery Fine .062 ‐ .125 1 1% 24%AFine .125 ‐ .25 3 4% 29%NMedium .25 ‐ .50 1 1% 30%DCoarse .50 ‐ 1.0 4 6% 36%SVery Coarse 1.0 ‐ 2.0 0 0% 36%Very Fine 2.0 ‐ 4.0 1 1% 37%GFine 4.0 ‐ 5.7 2 3% 40%RFine 5.7 ‐ 8.0 2 3% 43%AMedium 8.0 ‐ 11.3 2 3% 46%VMedium 11.3 ‐ 16.02 3% 49%ECoarse 16.0 ‐ 22.6 1 1% 50%LCoarse 22.6 ‐ 32.04 6% 56%SVery Coarse 32.0 ‐ 45.09 13% 69%Very Coarse 45.0 ‐ 64.013 19% 87%CSmall 64 ‐ 90 8 11% 99%OSmall 90 ‐ 128 1 1% 100%BLarge 128 ‐ 180 0 0% 100%LLarge 180 ‐ 256 0 0% 100%BSmall 256 ‐ 362 0 0% 100%LSmall 362 ‐ 512 0 0% 100%DMedium 512 ‐ 10240 0% 100%RLrg‐ Very Lrg 1024 ‐ 20480 0% 100%BDRKBedrock 0 0% 100%Totals70100%Summary DataD50 22.6D84 61D95 820%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%100%0.01 0.1 1 10 100 1000 10000% Cumulative (finer than)Particle Size (mm)X-Sec 6Particle Size DistributionTributary 1 - Tributaries of Wicker Branch - Union County, NCAsbuiltY1Y2Y3Y4Y50%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%100%0.01 0.125 0.25 0.5 1 2 4 6 8 11 16 22 32 45 64 90 128 180 256 362 512 1024 2048Individual Class PercentParticle Size (mm)X-Sec 6Particle Size DistributionTributary 1 - Tributaries of Wicker Branch - Union County, NCAsbuiltY1Y2Y3Y4Y5 Cross ‐ Section Pebble CountProject Name :  Tributaries of Wickers BranchCross Section: 7Feature: PoolDescription Particle Millimeter Total # Item % Cum %S/CSilt/Clay < 0.062 22 31% 31%SVery Fine .062 ‐ .125 1 1% 33%AFine .125 ‐ .25 3 4% 37%NMedium .25 ‐ .50 2 3% 40%DCoarse .50 ‐ 1.0 1 1% 41%SVery Coarse 1.0 ‐ 2.0 2 3% 44%Very Fine 2.0 ‐ 4.0 4 6% 50%GFine 4.0 ‐ 5.7 2 3% 53%RFine 5.7 ‐ 8.0 10 14% 67%AMedium 8.0 ‐ 11.3 6 9% 76%VMedium 11.3 ‐ 16.09 13% 89%ECoarse 16.0 ‐ 22.6 2 3% 91%LCoarse 22.6 ‐ 32.02 3% 94%SVery Coarse 32.0 ‐ 45.02 3% 97%Very Coarse 45.0 ‐ 64.01 1% 99%CSmall 64 ‐ 90 1 1% 100%OSmall 90 ‐ 128 0 0% 100%BLarge 128 ‐ 180 0 0% 100%LLarge 180 ‐ 256 0 0% 100%BSmall 256 ‐ 362 0 0% 100%LSmall 362 ‐ 512 0 0% 100%DMedium 512 ‐ 10240 0% 100%RLrg‐ Very Lrg 1024 ‐ 20480 0% 100%BDRKBedrock 0 0% 100%Totals70100%Summary DataD50 4D84 14D95 350%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%100%0.01 0.1 1 10 100 1000 10000% Cumulative (finer than)Particle Size (mm)X-Sec 7Particle Size DistributionTributary 1 - Tributaries of Wicker Branch - Union County, NCAsbuiltY1Y2Y3Y4Y50%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%100%0.01 0.125 0.25 0.5 1 2 4 6 8 11 16 22 32 45 64 90 128 180 256 362 512 1024 2048Individual Class PercentParticle Size (mm)X-Sec 7Particle Size DistributionTributary 1 - Tributaries of Wicker Branch - Union County, NCAsbuiltY1Y2Y3Y4Y5 Cross ‐ Section Pebble CountProject Name :  Tributaries of Wickers BranchCross Section: 8Feature: RiffleDescription Particle Millimeter Total # Item % Cum %S/CSilt/Clay < 0.062 30 43% 43%SVery Fine .062 ‐ .125 0 0% 43%AFine .125 ‐ .25 0 0% 43%NMedium .25 ‐ .50 0 0% 43%DCoarse .50 ‐ 1.0 0 0% 43%SVery Coarse 1.0 ‐ 2.0 3 4% 47%Very Fine 2.0 ‐ 4.0 4 6% 53%GFine 4.0 ‐ 5.7 4 6% 59%RFine 5.7 ‐ 8.0 2 3% 61%AMedium 8.0 ‐ 11.3 7 10% 71%VMedium 11.3 ‐ 16.06 9% 80%ECoarse 16.0 ‐ 22.6 5 7% 87%LCoarse 22.6 ‐ 32.04 6% 93%SVery Coarse 32.0 ‐ 45.02 3% 96%Very Coarse 45.0 ‐ 64.02 3% 99%CSmall 64 ‐ 90 1 1% 100%OSmall 90 ‐ 128 0 0% 100%BLarge 128 ‐ 180 0 0% 100%LLarge 180 ‐ 256 0 0% 100%BSmall 256 ‐ 362 0 0% 100%LSmall 362 ‐ 512 0 0% 100%DMedium 512 ‐ 10240 0% 100%RLrg‐ Very Lrg 1024 ‐ 20480 0% 100%BDRKBedrock 0 0% 100%Totals70100%Summary DataD50 3D84 20D95 420%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%100%0.01 0.1 1 10 100 1000 10000% Cumulative (finer than)Particle Size (mm)X-Sec 8Particle Size DistributionTributary 3 - Tributaries of Wicker Branch - Union County, NCAsbuiltY1Y2Y3Y4Y50%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%100%0.01 0.125 0.25 0.5 1 2 4 6 8 11 16 22 32 45 64 90 128 180 256 362 512 1024 2048Individual Class PercentParticle Size (mm)X-Sec 8Particle Size DistributionTributary 3 - Tributaries of Wicker Branch - Union County, NCAsbuiltY1Y2Y3Y4Y5 Cross ‐ Section Pebble CountProject Name :  Tributaries of Wickers BranchCross Section: 9Feature: RiffleDescription Particle Millimeter Total # Item % Cum %S/CSilt/Clay < 0.062 50 71% 71%SVery Fine .062 ‐ .125 1 1% 73%AFine .125 ‐ .25 0 0% 73%NMedium .25 ‐ .50 0 0% 73%DCoarse .50 ‐ 1.0 3 4% 77%SVery Coarse 1.0 ‐ 2.0 1 1% 79%Very Fine 2.0 ‐ 4.0 1 1% 80%GFine 4.0 ‐ 5.7 1 1% 81%RFine 5.7 ‐ 8.0 0 0% 81%AMedium 8.0 ‐ 11.3 0 0% 81%VMedium 11.3 ‐ 16.01 1% 83%ECoarse 16.0 ‐ 22.6 2 3% 86%LCoarse 22.6 ‐ 32.01 1% 87%SVery Coarse 32.0 ‐ 45.04 6% 93%Very Coarse 45.0 ‐ 64.04 6% 99%CSmall 64 ‐ 90 1 1% 100%OSmall 90 ‐ 128 0 0% 100%BLarge 128 ‐ 180 0 0% 100%LLarge 180 ‐ 256 0 0% 100%BSmall 256 ‐ 362 0 0% 100%LSmall 362 ‐ 512 0 0% 100%DMedium 512 ‐ 10240 0% 100%RLrg‐ Very Lrg 1024 ‐ 20480 0% 100%BDRKBedrock 0 0% 100%Totals70100%Summary DataD50 0.04D84 19D95 520%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%100%0.01 0.1 1 10 100 1000 10000% Cumulative (finer than)Particle Size (mm)X-Sec 9Particle Size DistributionTributary 3 - Tributaries of Wicker Branch - Union County, NCAsbuiltY1Y2Y3Y4Y50%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%100%0.01 0.125 0.25 0.5 1 2 4 6 8 11 16 22 32 45 64 90 128 180 256 362 512 1024 2048Individual Class PercentParticle Size (mm)X-Sec 9Particle Size DistributionTributary3 - Tributaries of Wicker Branch - Union County, NCAsbuiltY1Y2Y3Y4Y5 Cross ‐ Section Pebble CountProject Name :  Tributaries of Wickers BranchCross Section: 10Feature: PoolDescription Particle Millimeter Total # Item % Cum %S/CSilt/Clay < 0.062 55 79% 79%SVery Fine .062 ‐ .125 0 0% 79%AFine .125 ‐ .25 0 0% 79%NMedium .25 ‐ .50 2 3% 81%DCoarse .50 ‐ 1.0 3 4% 86%SVery Coarse 1.0 ‐ 2.0 4 6% 91%Very Fine 2.0 ‐ 4.0 3 4% 96%GFine 4.0 ‐ 5.7 2 3% 99%RFine 5.7 ‐ 8.0 1 1% 100%AMedium 8.0 ‐ 11.3 0 0% 100%VMedium 11.3 ‐ 16.00 0% 100%ECoarse 16.0 ‐ 22.6 0 0% 100%LCoarse 22.6 ‐ 32.00 0% 100%SVery Coarse 32.0 ‐ 45.00 0% 100%Very Coarse 45.0 ‐ 64.00 0% 100%CSmall 64 ‐ 90 0 0% 100%OSmall 90 ‐ 128 0 0% 100%BLarge 128 ‐ 180 0 0% 100%LLarge 180 ‐ 256 0 0% 100%BSmall 256 ‐ 362 0 0% 100%LSmall 362 ‐ 512 0 0% 100%DMedium 512 ‐ 10240 0% 100%RLrg‐ Very Lrg 1024 ‐ 20480 0% 100%BDRKBedrock 0 0% 100%Totals70100%Summary DataD50 0.03D84 0.04D95 0.80%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%100%0.01 0.1 1 10 100 1000 10000% Cumulative (finer than)Particle Size (mm)X-Sec 10Particle Size DistributionTributary 3 - Tributaries of Wicker Branch - Union County, NCAsbuiltY1Y2Y3Y4Y50%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%100%0.01 0.125 0.25 0.5 1 2 4 6 8 11 16 22 32 45 64 90 128 180 256 362 512 1024 2048Individual Class PercentParticle Size (mm)X-Sec 10Particle Size DistributionTributary 3 - Tributaries of Wicker Branch - Union County, NCAsbuiltY1Y2Y3Y4Y5 Cross ‐ Section Pebble CountProject Name :  Tributaries of Wickers BranchCross Section: 11Feature: RiffleDescription Particle Millimeter Total # Item % Cum %S/CSilt/Clay < 0.062 60 100% 100%SVery Fine .062 ‐ .125 0 0% 100%AFine .125 ‐ .25 0 0% 100%NMedium .25 ‐ .50 0 0% 100%DCoarse .50 ‐ 1.0 0 0% 100%SVery Coarse 1.0 ‐ 2.0 0 0% 100%Very Fine 2.0 ‐ 4.0 0 0% 100%GFine 4.0 ‐ 5.7 0 0% 100%RFine 5.7 ‐ 8.0 0 0% 100%AMedium 8.0 ‐ 11.3 0 0% 100%VMedium 11.3 ‐ 16.00 0% 100%ECoarse 16.0 ‐ 22.6 0 0% 100%LCoarse 22.6 ‐ 32.00 0% 100%SVery Coarse 32.0 ‐ 45.00 0% 100%Very Coarse 45.0 ‐ 64.00 0% 100%CSmall 64 ‐ 90 0 0% 100%OSmall 90 ‐ 128 0 0% 100%BLarge 128 ‐ 180 0 0% 100%LLarge 180 ‐ 256 0 0% 100%BSmall 256 ‐ 362 0 0% 100%LSmall 362 ‐ 512 0 0% 100%DMedium 512 ‐ 10240 0% 100%RLrg‐ Very Lrg 1024 ‐ 20480 0% 100%BDRKBedrock 0 0% 100%Totals60100%Summary DataD50 0.03D84 0.05D95 0.060%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%100%0.01 0.1 1 10 100 1000 10000% Cumulative (finer than)Particle Size (mm)X-Sec 11Particle Size DistributionTributary 4 - Tributaries of Wicker Branch - Union County, NCAsbuiltY1Y2Y3Y4Y50%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%100%0.01 0.125 0.25 0.5 1 2 4 6 8 11 16 22 32 45 64 90 128 180 256 362 512 1024 2048Individual Class PercentParticle Size (mm)X-Sec 11Particle Size DistributionTributary 4 - Tributaries of Wicker Branch - Union County, NCAsbuiltY1Y2Y3Y4Y5 Cross ‐ Section Pebble CountProject Name :  Tributaries of Wickers BranchCross Section: 12Feature: RiffleDescription Particle Millimeter Total # Item % Cum %S/CSilt/Clay < 0.062 50 71% 71%SVery Fine .062 ‐ .125 0 0% 71%AFine .125 ‐ .25 0 0% 71%NMedium .25 ‐ .50 0 0% 71%DCoarse .50 ‐ 1.0 3 4% 76%SVery Coarse 1.0 ‐ 2.0 3 4% 80%Very Fine 2.0 ‐ 4.0 3 4% 84%GFine 4.0 ‐ 5.7 2 3% 87%RFine 5.7 ‐ 8.0 3 4% 91%AMedium 8.0 ‐ 11.3 2 3% 94%VMedium 11.3 ‐ 16.01 1% 96%ECoarse 16.0 ‐ 22.6 2 3% 99%LCoarse 22.6 ‐ 32.01 1% 100%SVery Coarse 32.0 ‐ 45.00 0% 100%Very Coarse 45.0 ‐ 64.00 0% 100%CSmall 64 ‐ 90 0 0% 100%OSmall 90 ‐ 128 0 0% 100%BLarge 128 ‐ 180 0 0% 100%LLarge 180 ‐ 256 0 0% 100%BSmall 256 ‐ 362 0 0% 100%LSmall 362 ‐ 512 0 0% 100%DMedium 512 ‐ 10240 0% 100%RLrg‐ Very Lrg 1024 ‐ 20480 0% 100%BDRKBedrock 0 0% 100%Totals70100%Summary DataD50 0.04D84 3.9D95 13.70%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%100%0.01 0.1 1 10 100 1000 10000% Cumulative (finer than)Particle Size (mm)X-Sec 12Particle Size DistributionTributary 4 - Tributaries of Wicker Branch - Union County, NCAsbuiltSeries1Y2Y3Y4Y50%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%100%0.01 0.125 0.25 0.5 1 2 4 6 8 11 16 22 32 45 64 90 128 180 256 362 512 1024 2048Individual Class PercentParticle Size (mm)X-Sec 12Particle Size DistributionTributary 4 - Tributaries of Wicker Branch - Union County, NCAsbuiltY1Y2Y3Y4Y5 ParameterStream TypeDrainage Area (sq mi)DimensionMin MaxAvgMin MaxAvgMin MaxAvgMin MaxAvgMin MaxAvgnBF Width (ft)3.27 3.903.58 12.30 7.30 4.003.93 4.934.434BF Cross Sectional Area (ft2)1.52 1.991.74 10.80 4.20 1.501.62 2.801.944BF Mean Depth (ft)0.43 0.610.50 0.88 0.60 0.380.30 0.610.414BF Max Depth (ft)0.54 1.100.76 1.80 1.10 0.500.42 0.690.534Width/Depth Ratio5.36 8.487.37 13.98 12.60 10.527.49 14.9411.564Entrenchment Ratio1.54 1.881.70 >2.20 2.70 >2.207.16 10.188.634Wetted Perimeter (ft)3.94 4.314.17 14.13 5.77 4.764.31 5.094.734Hydraulic radius (ft)0.39 0.470.43 0.76 0.76 0.320.29 0.550.384Bank Height Ratio2.21 2.412.32 1.10 1.00 1.001.00 1.001.004Pool Area/Riffle AreaN/A 1.17 1.00 5.70 1.98Max riffle depth/mean riffle depth1.08 1.221.52 2.05 1.90 1.32 1.29Max pool depth/mean riffle depth1.22 2.31.76 2.38 2.5 6.50 2.76PatternChannel Beltwidth (ft)710924 52383.20 5.704.4015 302318 2522Radius of Curvature (ft)6875221351395301862012Meander Wavelength27 49718154 19612510.00 17.0013.6030 1107034 10650Meander Width ratio1.98 2.792.391.95 4.233.090.40 0.800.601.80 4.503.15 5.0Meander Length ratio7.64 138.7850.534.39 15.9310.161.40 2.301.907.50 27.5017.50 11.20Radius of Curvature/Riffle Width (ft)1.68 2.231.960.44 4.231.050.70 1.701.201.00 4.202.601.35 4.062.71Pool Length/Riffle Width3.91 7.655.530.76 1.941.45 N/A1.05 3.752.40 2.50Pool to Pool Spacing/ Riffle Width5.50 26.2613.081.06 3.781.972.40 3.302.903.50 14.759.132.93 13.77 6.00Riffle Length/Riffle Width1.90 20.758.130.30 1.841.07 N/A2.45 11.006.731.85 10.61 3.54Profile.Pool length (ft)14.0 27.419.89.3 23.917.8 N/A4.2 15.09.84.9 17.811.349Pool spacing (ft)19.7 94.046.813.0 46.524.217.6 24.120.814.0 59.026.513.0 61.026.648Riffle length (ft)6.8 74.329.13.7 22.613.1 N/A9.8 44.026.98.2 47.015.750Riffle slope (ft/ft)0.014 0.0270.020.020 0.0360.0260.006 0.0490.0280.018 0.0290.020.01 0.480.0350Pool slope (ft/ft)0.006 0.0170.0120.000 0.0050.0030.008 0.0140.0100.018 0.0290.0240.010 0.0010.00548Run slope (ft/ft)0.009 0.0250.0180.028 0.0590.041N/A N/A* N/A*Glide slope (ft/ft)0.006 0.0160.010.000 0.0120.003N/A N/A* N/A*Riffle Slope/Avg. Water Surface Slope1.09 2.111.561.52 2.731.970.40 3.201.801.29 2.091.69 2.36Run slope/Avg. Water Surface Slope0.73 1.951.412.12 4.473.11 N/A N/A* N/A*Pool Slope/Avg. Water Surface Slope0.47 1.330.940.00 0.380.230.50 0.900.601.29 2.091.69 0.39Glide Slope/Avg.Water Surface Slope0.50 1.250.780.00 0.910.23 N/A N/A* N/A*Substrated50 (mm)2.5 23.3210.09 8.6 12.7013.8 35.525.64d84 (mm)10.38 44.325.7 77.00 38.00123 37 8865.34Additional Reach ParametersValley Length (ft)1285 235 N/A 1284 1285Channel Length (ft)1293 266 N/A 1395 1390Valley Slope (ft/ft)0.0113 0.01380.0132 0.0139 0.0173 0.0132 0.0129Water Surface Slope (ft/ft)0.0080 0.01770.0128 0.0132 0.0156 0.0139 0.0127Sinuosity1 1.1 1.05 1.1 1.1* Runs and Glides are too short to obtain meaningful measurements0.50.11 0.1As-built Baseline (Tributary 1A)0.14Table 8. Baseline Stream Data SummaryTributaries of Wicker Branch Stream Restoration/ DMS No. 95022Existing Trib 1A to Wickers BranchReference Reach- Spencer CreekReference Reach UT4 Rockwell PasturesG4/B4c C4C4 E4Proposed Trib 1 to Wickers Branch ParameterStream TypeDrainage Area (sq mi)DimensionMin MaxAvgMin MaxAvgMin MaxAvgMin MaxAvgMin MaxAvgMin MaxAvgn Min MaxAvgnBF Width (ft)2.55 2.662.612.90 3.663.28 12.30 7.30 3.603.58 6.744.703 3.53 4.29 3.91 2BF Cross Sectional Area (ft2)0.40 0.630.520.83 1.130.98 10.80 4.20 1.081.16 6.983.231.21 1.231.222BF Mean Depth (ft)0.15 0.250.200.23 0.390.31 0.88 0.60 0.300.32 1.040.593 0.29 0.340.322BF Max Depth (ft)0.38 0.450.420.38 0.650.52 1.80 1.10 0.600.49 1.530.893 0.43 0.690.562Width/Depth Ratio10.20 17.7313.977.44 15.9111.68 13.98 12.60 12.006.48 11.199.153 10.38 14.7912.592Entrenchment Ratio1.36 1.881.622.46 4.843.65 >2.20 2.70 >2.205.12 8.607.203 4.26 5.504.882Wetted Perimeter (ft)2.83 2.842.843.26 3.773.52 14.13 5.77 4.203.59 6.805.202 3.81 4.424.122Hydraulic radius (ft)0.14 0.220.180.22 0.350.29 0.76 0.76 0.260.24 0.72 0.48 2 0.28 0.320.32Bank Height Ratio2.24 3.322.781.00 1.601.30 1.10 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Pool Area/Riffle AreaN/A N/A 1.17 1.00 8.00 0.52 N/AMax riffle depth/mean riffle depth1.9 2.252.08 1.68 2.05 1.90 2.00 1.51 1.78Max pool depth/mean riffle depth2.15 3.42.781.13 1.971.55 2.38 2.5 8.30 2.64 N/APatternChannel Beltwidth (ft)597 N/A24 52383.20 5.704.40 N/A* N/A*** N/A***Radius of Curvature (ft)285 N/A522135139 N/A* N/A*** N/A***Meander Wavelength109 312189 N/A54 19612510.00 17.0013.60 N/A* N/A*** N/A***Meander Width ratio2.00 3.312.65 N/A1.95 4.233.090.40 0.800.60 N/A* N/A*** N/A***Meander Length ratio41.68 119.3872.24 N/A4.39 15.9310.161.40 2.301.90 N/A* N/A*** N/A***Radius of Curvature/Riffle Width (ft)0.69 3.071.88 N/A0.44 4.231.050.70 1.701.20 N/A* N/A*** N/A***Pool Length/Riffle Width6.79 14.399.133.60 10.096.220.76 1.941.45 N/A1.11 1.67N/A* 2.19 2.38Pool to Pool Spacing/ Riffle Width14.80 34.6624.865.46 15.709.911.06 3.781.972.40 3.302.905.56 16.1110.83 11 37Riffle Length/Riffle Width2.72 8.585.405.46 11.168.450.30 1.841.07 N/A4.44 14.449.44 8.64 35.29Profile..Pool length (ft)17.7 37.623.811.8 33.120.49.3 23.917.8 N/A4.0 6.05.07.7 17.710.311 7.6 11.29.34Pool spacing (ft)38.6 90.564.917.9 51.532.513.0 46.524.217.6 24.120.820.0 58.045.334.7 885210 140 1501454Riffle length (ft)7.1 22.414.117.9 36.6227.73.7 22.613.1 N/A16.0 52.034.022.2 74.940.610 133 1451383Riffle slope (ft/ft)0.011 0.0270.0190.008 0.0140.00950.020 0.0360.0260.006 0.0490.0280.018 0.0290.020.0048 0.01790.011510 0.007 0.0140.0093Pool slope (ft/ft)0.012 0.0130.0110.008 0.0090.00850.000 0.0050.0030.008 0.0140.0100.018 0.0290.0240.0001 0.00480.0025100.0001 0.00120.00074Run slope (ft/ft)0.013 0.0340.0230.008 0.0300.01250.028 0.0590.041N/A N/A N/A**** N/A****Glide slope (ft/ft)0.008 0.0200.0120.0050 0.04600.0150.000 0.0120.003N/A N/A N/A**** N/A****Riffle Slope/Avg. Water Surface Slope0.79 1.931.360.89 1.561.061.52 2.731.970.40 3.201.801.29 2.091.69 0.97 0.95Run slope/Avg. Water Surface Slope0.93 2.431.640.87 3.331.392.12 4.473.11 N/A N/A N/A**** N/A****Pool Slope/Avg. Water Surface Slope0.86 0.930.790.89 0.970.940.00 0.380.230.50 0.900.601.29 2.091.69 0.21 0.07Glide Slope/Avg.Water Surface Slope0.57 1.430.860.56 5.111.670.00 0.910.23 N/A N/A N/A**** N/A****Substrated50 (mm)0.04 0.04 8.6 12.700.06 167.13 0.03 4.72.42d84 (mm)0.06 6.16 77.00 38.00 108529173 0.05 1472Additional Reach ParametersValley Length (ft)1184 629 235 N/A 1284 1184 629Channel Length (ft)1184 631 266 N/A 1395 1184 631Valley Slope (ft/ft)0.0116 0.01640.01350.0087 0.01220.0095 0.0139 0.0173 0.0132 0.0119 0.0097Water Surface Slope (ft/ft)0.0100 0.01760.01400.0090 0.00900.0090 0.0132 0.0156 0.0139 0.0119 0.0095Sinuosity1 1 1.1 1.05 1.1 1.0 1.0* Tributary 3 and 4 - The Pattern of the channel was not altered. Tributary 4 only minimal work consisting of altering dimension was performed. ** Tributary modified/channelized in past so application of classification of natural channels may not be applicable***Note on Tributaries 3 and 4 Pattern Data. These two tributaries are relatively straight channels. Beltwidth, radius of curvature, and other measurements are not applicable.**** Runs and glides are too short to obtain meaningfull measurementsTable 8. Baseline Stream Data SummaryTributaries of Wicker Branch Stream Restoration/ DMS No. 95022Existing Trib 3 to Wickers BranchExisting Trib 4 to Wickers BranchReference Reach- Spencer CreekReference Reach UT4 Rockwell PasturesProposed Trib 3 & 4 to Wickers Branch*As-built Baseline (Tributary 3) As-built Baseline (Tributary 4)0.05 0.05 0.50.11 0.05B6c E6** C4C4 C4 Base MY1 MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5 MY+ Base MY1 MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5 MY+ Base MY1 MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5MY+ Base MY1 MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5 MY+ Base MY1 MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5 MY+Bankfull Width (ft) 3.97 3.93 3.07 3.26 4.77 4.33 5.13 6.09 5.85 4.81 8.836.1 4.51 4.57 5.08 4.25 11 9.9 5.14 5.31 6.2 9.9 9.6 9.6 4.76 4.27 3.8 3.9 4.5 4.2Floodprone Width (ft) 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 5050 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50Bankfull Mean Depth (ft) 0.38 0.41 0.42 0.28 0.31 0.35 0.78 0.7 0.69 0.820.45 0.65 0.68 0.61 0.8 0.6 0.28 0.31 0.72 0.68 0.83 0.41 0.38 0.35 0.32 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.34 0.38Bankfull Max Depth (ft) 0.53 0.51 0.5 0.37 0.45 0.55 1.19 1.21 1.38 1.21 1.2 1.4 1 0.69 1.22 0.9 0.89 0.86 1.33 1.26 1.5 1.28 1.42 1.35 0.79 0.42 0.45 0.42 0.47 0.55Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft2)1.51 1.62 1.28 0.92 1.51 1.51 3.98 4.27 4.03 3.96 3.98 3.98 3.08 2.8 4.06 2.363.08 3.08 3.72 3.59 5.17 4.1 3.72 3.72 1.54 1.7 1.3 1.1 1.54 1.54Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio 10.45 9.59 7.31 11.64 15.39 12.37 6.58 8.7 8.5 4.81 19.6 9.4 6.63 7.49 6.4 7.59 39.29 32.03 7.14 7.81 7.4 24.1 25.2 27.4 14.87 14.23 11.5 13.6 13.24 10.95Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio 10.06 10.18 16.29 15.34 8.03 11.5 7.79 6.578.5 10.4 5.6 8.2 11.1 8.72 9.8 11.8 4.5 5 9.7 7.49 8.1 5 5.2 5.2 10.5 8.44 13.2 12.6 11.11 12Low Top of Bank Depth (ft) NA NA NA NA 0.43 0.46 NA NA NA NA 1.07 1.26 0.89 0.82 1.31 1.25 0.43 0.58Bankfull Bank Height Ratio 1 1 1 1 0.96 0.83 1 1 1 1 0.89 0.9 1 1 0.9 0.9 1 0.95 11 1 1 0.92 0.92 1 1 1 1 0.9 1.05Based on current/developing bankfull featureBankfull Width (ft)Floodprone Width (ft)Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)Bankfull Max Depth (ft)Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft2)Bankfull Width/Depth RatioBankfull Entrenchment RatioBankfull Bank Height RatioCross Sectional Area between end pins (ft2) d50 (mm) 35.5 32.9 31.2 14.5 21.8 19.7 7.7 6.9 0.8 13.6 6.8 6.8 25.7 32 73 64 6564 0.03 0.04 0.05 0.06 0.06 0.06 27.3 42.4 45 11.3 30.6 26.1Base MY1 MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5 MY+ Base MY1 MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5 MY+ Base MY1 MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5MY+ Base MY1 MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5 MY+ Base MY1 MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5 MY+Bankfull Width (ft) 4.39 4.93 4.37 3.98 10.02 5.09 6.59 6.21 9.94 10.5 7.15.53Floodprone Width (ft) 50 50 50 50 50 50 40 40 40 40 40 40Bankfull Mean Depth (ft) 0.39 0.33 0.4 0.34 0.17 0.34 0.49 0.59 0.4 0.4 0.45 0.58Bankfull Max Depth (ft) 0.58 0.5 0.5 0.43 0.5 0.57 0.85 0.92 0.97 0.87 0.90.93Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft2)1.72 1.64 1.73 1.35 1.72 1.72 3.21 3.69 3.98 3.92 3.21 3.21Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio 11.26 14.94 10.97 11.7 58.4 14.97 13.45 10.53 24.8 28.5 15.78 9.53Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio 11.4 7.16 11.4 11.4 4.99 7.85 6.1 6.37 4.02 3.8 5.6 7.2Low Top of Bank Depth (ft) NA NA NA NA 0.44 0.53 NA NA NA NA 0.74 0.94Bankfull Bank Height Ratio 1 1 1 1 0.88 0.92 1 1 1 1 0.82 1.01Based on current/developing bankfull featureBankfull Width (ft)Floodprone Width (ft)Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)Bankfull Max Depth (ft)Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft2)Bankfull Width/Depth RatioBankfull Entrenchment RatioBankfull Bank Height RatioCross Sectional Area between end pins (ft2) d50 (mm) 13.8 12.9 41 5.2 10 22.6 11.2 6.3 0.8 3 3.6 4Note: Bankfull elevation for MY 1 - 3 based on fixed baseline bankfull elevation. Bankfull elevation for MY 4 and 5 based on Bankfull Cross-sectional area per USACE guidance.Cross Section 4 (Pool) Cross Section 5 (Riffle)Cross Section 6 (Riffle) Cross Section 7 (Pool) Cross Section Cross Section Cross Section Table 9a. Morphology and Hydraulic Monitoring Summary (Dimensional Parameters – Cross Sections)Tributaries of Wicker Branch Stream Restoration/ DMS No. 95022Cross Section 1 (Riffle) Cross Section 2 (Pool) Cross Section 3 (Riffle) Base MY1 MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5 MY+ Base MY1 MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5 MY+ Base MY1 MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5MY+Bankfull Width (ft) 4 4.3 4.2 4.9 3.8 6.7 3.58 3.48 3.3 3.2 4.17 3.04 6.74 6.19 6.61 6.39 12.03 11Floodprone Width (ft) 32 32 40 40 40 40 31 31 32 33 33 34 35 35 33 32 35 35Bankfull Mean Depth (ft) 0.41 0.38 0.33 0.25 0.44 0.25 0.32 0.24 0.31 0.32 0.27 0.39 1.04 0.79 0.84 0.8 0.57 0.63Bankfull Max Depth (ft) 0.65 0.71 0.6 0.6 0.77 0.72 0.49 0.38 0.49 0.54 0.55 0.63 1.53 1.29 1.22 1.2 1.46 1.54Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft2)1.66 1.65 1.38 1.25 1.66 1.66 1.16 0.85 1.01 1.03 1.16 1.16 6.98 4.87 5.53 5.09 6.98 6.98Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio 9.78 11.32 12.8 19.9 8.59 26.8 11.19 14.5 10.6 10 15.44 7.8 6.48 7.84 7.87 7.99 21.1 17.5Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio 7.9 9.31 9.48 8 10.57 5.97 8.6 6.89 9.77 10.35 7.89 11.5 5.12 5.1 4.96 5.02 2.96 3.2Low Top of Bank Depth (ft) 0.89 0.67 0.51 0.63 1.29 1.45Bankfull Bank Height Ratio11111.15 0.9311110.93 111110.89 0.94Based on current/developing bankfull featureBankfull Width (ft)Floodprone Width (ft)Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)Bankfull Max Depth (ft)Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft2)Bankfull Width/Depth RatioBankfull Entrenchment RatioBankfull Bank Height RatioCross Sectional Area between end pins (ft2) d50 (mm) 5.42 0.04 0.03 4 4 3 16 0.04 0.04 0.03 0.04 0.04 0.06 0.04 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03Based on fixed baseline bankfull elevationBase MY1 MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5 MY+ Base MY1 MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5 MY+ Base MY1 MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5MY+Bankfull Width (ft) 3.53 2.98 3.22 3.54 3.58 3.23 4.29 4.17 4.18 3.15 3.813.18Floodprone Width (ft) 19.5 19.5 18 14 14 18 18.3 18.3 24 11 19 23Bankfull Mean Depth (ft) 0.34 0.41 0.35 0.36 0.33 0.38 0.29 0.25 0.28 0.30.32 0.39Bankfull Max Depth (ft) 0.69 0.69 0.62 0.53 0.53 0.61 0.43 0.44 0.5 0.48 0.53 0.57Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft2)1.21 1.22 1.12 1.27 1.21 1.21 1.23 1.05 1.19 0.94 1.23 1.23Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio 10.38 7.27 9.2 9.83 10.85 8.5 14.79 16.68 14.93 10.5 11.91 8.15Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio 5.5 6.39 5.42 3.94 3.97 5.7 4.26 5.4 5.83 3.55.1 7.2Low Top of Bank Depth (ft) 0.49 0.56 0.6 0.64Bankfull Bank Height Ratio11110.93 0.91 1 1 1 1.1 1.1 1.1Based on current/developing bankfull featureBankfull Width (ft)Floodprone Width (ft)Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)Bankfull Max Depth (ft)Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft2)Bankfull Width/Depth RatioBankfull Entrenchment RatioBankfull Bank Height RatioCross Sectional Area between end pins (ft2) d50 (mm) 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 4.7 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.04Note: Bankfull elevation for MY 1 - 3 based on fixed baseline bankfull elevation. Bankfull elevation for MY 4 and 5 based on Bankfull Cross-sectional area per USACE guidance.Table 9a. Morphology and Hydraulic Monitoring Summary (Dimensional Parameters – Cross Sections)Tributaries of Wicker Branch Stream Restoration/ DMS No. 95022Cross Section 8 (Pool) Cross Section 9 (Riffle) Cross Section 10 (Riffle)Cross Section 11 (Riffle) Cross Section 12 (Riffle) Cross Section ParameterDimension and Substrate - RiffleMin Max Avg Min Max Avg Min Max Avg Min Max Avg Min Max Avg Min Max AvgBankfull Width (ft) 3.97 4.76 4.41 3.93 4.93 4.43 3.07 5.08 4.08 3.26 4.253.84 4.50 11.00 7.57 4.33 9.9 6.2Floodprone Width (ft) 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 40 50 47.5Bankfull Mean Depth (ft) 0.32 0.68 0.44 0.30 0.61 0.41 0.30 0.80 0.48 0.28 0.6 0.38 0.17 0.34 0.28 0.31 0.58 0.391Bankfull Max Depth (ft)0.53 1.00 0.73 0.42 0.69 0.53 0.45 1.22 0.67 0.37 0.9 0.53 0.45 0.89 0.58 0.550.93 0.72Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft2)1.51 3.08 1.96 1.62 2.80 1.94 1.28 4.06 2.09 0.92 2.36 1.43 1.51 3.08 1.96 1.51 3.21 2.38Width/Depth Ratio 6.63 14.87 10.80 7.49 14.94 11.56 6.40 11.50 9.05 7.59 13.6 11.13 13.24 58.40 31.58 9.53 32.03 17.2Entrenchment Ratio 10.1 11.4 10.8 7.16 10.18 8.63 9.80 16.29 12.67 11.4 15.34 12.79 4.50 11.11 7.16 5.00 11.5 7.89Low Top of Bank Depth (ft)0.43 0.89 0.55 0.46 0.94 0.691Bank Height Ratio11110.88 1 0.94 0.83 1.01 0.93ProfileRiffle Length (ft) 8.2 47 15.7 6.3 46 14.4 10 47 16 6.7 48 16.5 8 48 16.5 8 48 15Riffle Slope (ft/ft) 0.0125 0.475 0.0253 0.007 0.047 0.024 0.006 0.047 0.022 0.011 0.048 0.025 0.012 0.047 0.025 0.012 0.048 0.024Pool Length (ft) 4.9 17.8 11.3 7.8 17.9 13.1 7.9 18 12.9 5.2 17.3 10.4 7.6 17.5 10.3 6 18 11Pool Max depth (ft) 1.27 1.78 1.53 1.15 1.92 1.49 1.14 1.8 1.47 1.2 1.6 1.41.2 1.58 1.42 1.2 1.6 1.4Pool Spacing (ft) 13 61 26.6 13.8 60 26.9 12.7 60 27.6 14 60 27.1 13 60 27.5 1660 27PatternChannel Beltwidth (ft) 18 25 22 18 25 22 18 25 22 18 25 22 18 25 22 18 25 22Radius of Curvature (ft) 6 20 12 6 20 12 6 20 12 6 20 12 6 20 12 6 20 12Rc/Bankfull width (ft/ft) 1.36 4.54 2.72 1.35 4.51 2.71 1.47 4.90 2.94 1.56 5.21 3.13 0.79 2.64 1.58 0.97 3.23 1.94Meander Wavelength (ft) 34 106 50 34 106 50 34 106 50 34 106 50 34 106 50 34 10650Meander Width Ratio 5.0 5.0 5.4 5.7 2.9 3.5Transport parametersReach Shear Stress (competency) lb/f2Max part size (mm) mobilized at bankfullStream Power (transport capacity) W/m2Additional Reach ParametersRosgen ClassificationBankfull Velocity (fps)Bankfull Discharge (cfs)Valley length (ft)Channel Thalweg length (ft)Sinuosity (ft)Water Surface Slope (Channel) (ft/ft)BF slope (ft/ft)3Bankfull Floodplain Area (acres)4Proportion over wide (%)Channel Stability or Habitat MetricBiological or OtherMY 2 MY 3 MY 4 MY 50.0129 0.0129 0.0129 0.0129 0.0129 0.01290.0127 0.0127 0.0127 0.0127 0.0127 0.01271.1 1.1 1.1 1.1 1.1 1.11390 1390 1390 1390 1390 13901285 1285 1285 1285 1285 1285C4 C4 C4 C4 C4 C4Table 9b. Stream Reach Data Summary Tributaries of Wicker Branch Stream Restoration/ DMS No. 95022Trib 1A Trib 1A Trib 1A Trib 1A Trib 1A Trib 1AMY 0 MY 1 ParameterDimension and Substrate - RiffleMin Max Avg Min Max Avg Min Max Avg Min Max Avg Min Max Avg Min Max AvgBankfull Width (ft) 3.58 6.74 4.77 3.48 6.19 4.66 3.30 6.61 4.70 3.2 6.39 4.833.80 12.03 6.673.04 11 7.02Floodprone Width (ft) 31.00 35.00 32.67 31 35 32.70 32 40 35 32 40 35.0033 40 3634 35 34.5Bankfull Mean Depth (ft) 0.32 1.04 0.59 0.24 0.79 0.47 0.31 0.84 0.49 0.25 0.8 0.460.27 0.57 0.430.39 0.63 0.511Bankfull Max Depth (ft)0.49 1.53 0.89 0.38 1.29 0.79 0.49 1.22 0.77 0.54 1.2 0.780.55 1.46 0.930.63 1.54 1.085Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft2)1.16 6.98 3.27 0.85 4.87 2.45 1.01 5.53 2.64 1.03 5.09 2.461.16 6.98 3.271.16 6.98 4.07Width/Depth Ratio 6.48 11.19 9.15 7.84 14.5 11.22 7.87 12.80 10.42 7.99 19.9 12.638.59 21.10 15.047.8 17.5 12.65Entrenchment Ratio 5.12 8.60 7.21 5.1 9.31 7.10 4.96 9.77 8.07 5.02 10.35 7.792.96 10.57 7.143.2 11.5 7.35Low Top of Bank Depth (ft)0.51 1.29 0.900.63 1.45 1.041Bank Height Ratio11110.89 1.15 0.990.94 1 0.97ProfileRiffle Length (ft) 22.2 74.9 40.6 22.2 74.9 40.6 24 73 43 25 76 43 23 73 43 23 7343Riffle Slope (ft/ft) 0.0048 0.0179 0.0115 0.0048 0.019 0.013 0.0048 0.0179 0.0115 0.003 0.019 0.012 0.0048 0.0179 0.013 0.0048 0.0179 0.012Pool Length (ft) 7.7 17.7 10.3 7.6 17.8 10.4 6 12 9.4 6 9 7.6 6 12 10 6 13 9Pool Max depth (ft) 1.01 1.97 1.56 1 1.95 1.52 0.9 1.7 1.3 0.9 1.6 1.2 0.9 1.7 1.2 0.9 1.7 1.3Pool Spacing (ft) 34.7 88 52 34.8 88.1 52 31 84 52 31 83 50 32 83 52 36 87 58PatternChannel Beltwidth (ft) N/A* N/A* N/A* N/A* N/A* N/A* N/A* N/A* N/A* N/A* N/A* N/A* N/A* N/A* N/A* N/A* N/A* N/A*Radius of Curvature (ft) N/A* N/A* N/A* N/A* N/A* N/A* N/A* N/A* N/A* N/A* N/A* N/A* N/A* N/A* N/A* N/A* N/A* N/A*Rc/Bankfull width (ft/ft) N/A* N/A* N/A* N/A* N/A* N/A* N/A* N/A* N/A* N/A* N/A* N/A* N/A* N/A* N/A* N/A* N/A* N/A*Meander Wavelength (ft) N/A* N/A* N/A* N/A* N/A* N/A* N/A* N/A* N/A* N/A*N/A* N/A* N/A* N/A* N/A* N/A* N/A* N/A*Meander Width Ratio N/A* N/A* N/A* N/A* N/A* N/A* N/A* N/A* N/A* N/A* N/A*N/A* N/A* N/A* N/A* N/A* N/A* N/A*Transport parametersReach Shear Stress (competency) lb/f2Max part size (mm) mobilized at bankfullStream Power (transport capacity) W/m2Additional Reach ParametersRosgen ClassificationBankfull Velocity (fps)Bankfull Discharge (cfs)Valley length (ft)Channel Thalweg length (ft)Sinuosity (ft)Water Surface Slope (Channel) (ft/ft)BF slope (ft/ft)3Bankfull Floodplain Area (acres)4Proportion over wide (%)Channel Stability or Habitat MetricBiological or Other*Note on Tributary 3 Pattern Data. This tributary is a relatively straight channel. Beltwidth, radius of curvature, and other pattern measurements does not provide meaningfull information0.0119 0.0119 0.0119 0.0119 0.0119 0.01190.0119 0.0119 0.0119 0.0119 0.0119 0.01191.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.01184 1184 1184 1184 1184 11841184 1184 1184 1184 1184 1184C4 C4 C4 C4 C4 C4Trib 3 Trib 3 Trib 3 Trib 3 Trib 3 Trib 3Table 9b. Stream Reach Data Summary Tributaries of Wicker Branch Stream Restoration/ DMS No. 95022MY 0 MY 1 MY 2 MY 3 MY 4 MY 5 ParameterDimension and Substrate - RiffleMin Max Avg Min Max Avg Min Max Avg Min Max Avg Min Max Avg Min Max AvgBankfull Width (ft) 3.53 4.29 3.91 2.98 4.17 3.57 3.57 4.17 2.98 3.15 3.543.343.58 3.81 3.703.18 3.23 3.205Floodprone Width (ft) 18.30 19.50 18.90 18.3 19.5 18.9 18.9 19.5 18.3 11 14 12.5014.00 19.00 16.5018 23 20.5Bankfull Mean Depth (ft) 0.29 0.34 0.32 0.25 0.41 0.33 0.33 0.41 0.25 0.30.36 0.330.32 0.330.33 0.38 0.39 0.3851Bankfull Max Depth (ft)0.43 0.69 0.56 0.44 0.69 0.56 0.56 0.69 0.44 0.48 0.53 0.510.53 0.530.53 0.57 0.61 0.59Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft2)1.21 1.23 1.22 1.05 1.22 1.13 1.13 1.22 1.05 0.94 1.27 1.111.21 1.231.22 1.21 1.23 1.22Width/Depth Ratio 10.38 14.79 12.59 7.27 16.68 11.97 11.97 16.68 7.27 9.83 10.5 10.1710.85 11.91 11.388.15 8.5 8.325Entrenchment Ratio 4.26 5.50 4.88 5.4 6.39 5.89 5.89 6.39 5.40 3.5 3.94 3.723.97 5.10 4.545.7 7.2 6.45Low Top of Bank Depth (ft)0.49 0.60 0.550.56 0.64 0.601Bank Height Ratio1110.93 1.10 1.020.91 1.1 1.005ProfileRiffle Length (ft) 133 145 138 130 145 136 140 160 148 134 146 139 134 160 148Riffle Slope (ft/ft) 0.007 0.014 0.009 0.006 0.014 0.009 0.006 0.014 0.009 0.007 0.014 0.01 0.006 0.014 0.009Pool Length (ft) 7.6 11.2 9.3 7.4 11.1 9.2 7.1 13 10.6 5 9 7 7.4 13 10.6Pool Max depth (ft) 1.39 2.35 1.78 1.37 2.35 1.77 1.18 1.79 1.46 1 1.53 1.22 1.39 1.79 1.46Pool Spacing (ft) 140 150 145 140 150 145 140 150 145 140 150 145 140 150 145PatternChannel Beltwidth (ft) N/A* N/A* N/A* N/A* N/A* N/A* N/A* N/A* N/A* N/A* N/A* N/A* N/A* N/A* N/A* N/A* N/A* N/A*Radius of Curvature (ft) N/A* N/A* N/A* N/A* N/A* N/A* N/A* N/A* N/A* N/A* N/A* N/A* N/A* N/A* N/A* N/A* N/A* N/A*Rc/Bankfull width (ft/ft) N/A* N/A* N/A* N/A* N/A* N/A* N/A* N/A* N/A* N/A* N/A* N/A* N/A* N/A* N/A* N/A* N/A* N/A*Meander Wavelength (ft) N/A* N/A* N/A* N/A* N/A* N/A* N/A* N/A* N/A* N/A*N/A* N/A* N/A* N/A* N/A* N/A* N/A* N/A*Meander Width Ratio N/A* N/A* N/A* N/A* N/A* N/A* N/A* N/A* N/A* N/A* N/A*N/A* N/A* N/A* N/A* N/A* N/A* N/A*Transport parametersReach Shear Stress (competency) lb/f2Max part size (mm) mobilized at bankfullStream Power (transport capacity) W/m2Additional Reach ParametersRosgen ClassificationBankfull Velocity (fps)Bankfull Discharge (cfs)Valley length (ft)Channel Thalweg length (ft)Sinuosity (ft)Water Surface Slope (Channel) (ft/ft)BF slope (ft/ft)3Bankfull Floodplain Area (acres)4Proportion over wide (%)Channel Stability or Habitat MetricBiological or Other*Note on Tributary 4 Pattern Data. This tributary is a relatively straight channel. Beltwidth, radius of curvature, and other pattern measurements does not provide meaningfull information0.0095 0.0095 0.0095 0.0095 0.0095 0.00950.00972 0.00972 0.00972 0.00972 0.00972 0.009721.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0631 631 631 631 631 631631 631 631 631 631 631N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/ATrib 4 Trib 4 Trib 4 Trib 4 Trib 4 Trib 4Table 9b. Stream Reach Data Summary Tributaries of Wicker Branch Stream Restoration/ DMS No. 95022MY 0 MY 1 MY 2 MY 3 MY 4 MY 5 Tributaries to Wickers Branch Stream Restoration Site Year 5 (2019) Monitoring Report DMS Project No. 95022 APPENDIX E: HYDROLOGIC DATA Table 10 – Verification of Bankfull Events Tributaries to Wickers Branch Stream Restoration Site Year 5 (2019) Monitoring Report DMS Project No. 95022 Table 10. Documentation of Geomorphologically Significant Flow Events Tributaries of Wicker Branch Stream Restoration/ DMS No. 95022 Date of Observation Date of occurrence Method Greater Than Qgs=Q2*0.66 Stage Greater than Qbkf Stage? Notes 12/3/2014 11/23/2014 Photo on- site wrack line Yes See photo below 4/17/2017 Apr-17 Crest Gauge Yes See photos below. Most likely occurred on 1/2/2017 or 1/3/2017 when site received a total of 1.5 inches of rain 2/6/2018 1/29/2018 Photo, crest gauge, and transducer data Yes See photos and transducer graphs 9/16/2018 9/16/2018 Transducer data Yes See transducer graphs 4/8/2019 4/8/2019 Transducer data Yes See transducer graphs 4/22/2019 Feb or Apr- 19 Crest Gauge Yes See Photo Photo of wrack lines from 11/23/2014 bankfull event Tributaries to Wickers Branch Stream Restoration Site Year 5 (2019) Monitoring Report DMS Project No. 95022 Tributary 1 Crest Gauge 4/17/2017 Tributary 3 Crest Gauge 4/17/2017 Tributary 1 wrack lines 2/6/2018 Tributary 3 wrack lines 2/6/2018 Tributary 1 Crest gauge 4/22/2019 Tributaries to Wickers Branch Stream Restoration Site Year 5 (2019) Monitoring Report DMS Project No. 95022 Tributaries to Wickers Branch Stream Restoration Site Year 5 (2019) Monitoring Report DMS Project No. 95022 Tributaries to Wickers Branch Stream Restoration Site Year 5 (2019) Monitoring Report DMS Project No. 95022 Tributaries to Wickers Branch Stream Restoration Site Year 5 (2019) Monitoring Report DMS Project No. 95022 APPENDIX F: 2018 IRT SITE VISIT MEMORANDUM AND RESPONSE MEMORANDUM To: Todd Tugwell (USACE), Kim Browning (USACE), Mac Haupt (NCDWR) Cc: Paul Wiesner (NCDMS), Ron Johnson (AECOM) From: Harry Tsomides (NCDMS) Re: Tributaries to Wicker Branch Restoration Site, Union County - 2017 Credit Release and IRT Site Visit Date: 5/4/2017 Meeting Summary Below are summary points discussed during the 4/17/2017 Tributaries to Wicker Branch Credit Release on-site meeting. The meeting was held to evaluate the viability of the 2017-MY2 requested credit release. This full delivery site is currently undergoing MY3 mitigation success monitoring. Project Name: Tributaries to Wicker Branch DMS ID: 95022 DMS PM: Harry Tsomides Full Delivery Provider: AECOM FD Contract No.: 003982 Site Meeting Attendees: Ron Johnson, AECOM Harry Tsomides, NCDMS Paul Wiesner, NCDMS Mac Haupt, NCDWR Kim Browning, USACE Todd Tugwell, USACE Areas of low stem density - While the overall stem density is showing success, there are numerous grassy expanses along the stream where planted stems are not evident. It was recommended that supplemental planting be conducted this fall/winter so that larger areas with low woody stem density more closely represent the plot location densities. Transect data collection was also discussed as a tool to provide data for non-plot areas, and if this is collected it should be included in the annual monitoring reports (locations, basic methodology, stem counts, etc). Stream segment between wetland areas on Trib 3 where a stream is not evident – Keep monitoring and looking for stream channel formation; if wetland conditions persist there could be withholding of stream credits in future years. Bank full event data collection and verification – Several recommendations were made by the IRT: (1) Add a continuous flow gage on Trib 1A, 50-100 feet above the confluence with Trib 2, (2) add a second continuous flow gage at least half way up Trib 3, as flow gages at the bottom end of low flow channels do not represent reach-wide average flow conditions, (3) maintain crest gages /flow gages/mounted cameras appropriately to make sure they are working and that we get good data every year since hydrology has been the main project concern so far. The subject of proper placement of flow gages came up and question asked why these were placed in pools rather than riffles. AECOM indicated they were submerged in pools but the atmospheric corrections are being made and the elevations have been set to record flow elevations at the head of the next downstream riffle. Overall, hydrology is a significant concern since the site has not had a true documented post-construction bankfull flow event. Invasives treatment – Everyone agreed privet needs to be treated aggressively on lower Tributary 1B. AECOM indicated they are getting quotes from subcontractors for this work and that it will be performed soon. Easement violations –AECOM needs to keep the farmer from scalloping the edges in some locations; also the crossing at lower Trib 3 has had recent encroachment along it due to equipment crossing. AECOM indicated (and the group viewed) some areas where recent boundary marking improvements had been installed by AECOM. AECOM will continue to monitor, post/repost as necessary to maintain ensure compliance. The IRT concluded that MY2 requested credits will be released; however the above issues will be revisited during the MY3 requested credit release in early 2018. \ AECOM 701 Corporate Center Drive Suite 475 Raleigh, North Carolina 27609 www.aecom.com 919 854 6200 tel 919 854 6259 fax Memorandum This memorandum is to follow up on the April 25 IRT meeting. During that meeting the IRT requested that AECOM provide an Adaptive Mitigation Plan to address invasives within the wooded area of Reach 1B and to address encroachments on the equipment crossings on Tributary 2 and 3. Additionally, they wanted information on the stream lengths and stream mitigation units (SMUs) that were being generated by Tributary 1A and the upper reach of Tributary 3. Invasives Treatment – The primary invasive species on Tributary 1B is Chinese privet, which is present throughout the buffer. An initial treatment of the privet was performed in October 2014 when the project underwent construction. A second treatment was performed in the Spring of 2016 but it was not very effective. A third treatment was performed in October 2017. AECOM has contracted with Habitat Assessment & Restoration Professionals (HARP) to perform two treatments of the privet in 2018. The first treatment will occur in May with a second treatment to follow. The timing of the second treatment has not yet been determined, and will depend upon the effectiveness of the May treatment. Additional treatments in 2019 (MY05) will be performed if necessary to control any remaining privet. Easement Encroachment – The farmer that leases the land is currently encroaching on the easement at the equipment crossings at Tributary 1 and Tributary 3. While additional signage was placed in these areas in 2017, a small amount of encroachment is still occurring. Longitudinal encroachments that occurred in 2015 and 2016 are no longer occurring. AECOM will reinstall signage at the easement corners where the signs have been damaged by the large farm equipment. The posts will be taller and more robust to ensure that the farmer sees and avoids the signs and the encroachments. AECOM will also have additional discussions with the farmer regarding the need to stay within the boundaries of the equipment crossings, and convey the seriousness of the easements. We will also discuss the need to communicate the need to stay out of the easements to any of the farm hands or equipment operators that farm the adjacent property. Stream Lengths and Stream Mitigation Units – The project as described in the Mitigation Plan is projected to generate 2539.65 SMUs through a mixture of Restoration, Enhancement I, and Enhancement II. Tributary 1A consisted of 1390 feet of Restoration at a Mitigation Ratio of 1:1 which would generate 1390 SMUs. On Tributary 3, there is a 264 foot reach between 2 wetland areas that has been proposed as Enhancement II at a Mitigation Ratio of 2.5:1. This length was projected to generate 105.6 SMUs. The total SMUs from Tributary 1A and the upper section of Tributary 3 is 1495.6 SMUs. To Harry Tsomides, DMS Project Manager Page 1 CC Subject Tributaries of Wickers Branch – MY03 Credit Release From Ron Johnson Date May 3, 2018 \ AECOM 701 Corporate Center Drive Suite 475 Raleigh, North Carolina 27609 www.aecom.com 919 854 6200 tel 919 854 6259 fax Memorandum This memorandum is to respond to observations and comments from the October 5, 2018 site visit performed by DMS Property (Jeffery Horton) and NCDEQ Stewardship ) Ed Hajnos) and provided to AECOM via an email dated December 19, 2018 as well as a your site visit on October 16, 2018 and provided in an email dated October 26, 2018 and letter dated December 17, 2018. Invasives – Please continue treatments, including privet which is still abundant on UT1b; other areas have honeysuckle which is choking out the planted trees. Some cattails; china berry, etc. AECOM will continue to treat the privet along UT-1b. Areas with extensive growth of honeysuckle will also be treated this spring. China berry trees will be physically cut. The cattails are confined to a relatively small wet area. It is not anticipated that they will spread from that area. The cattails will eventually be shaded out as the overstory develops. However, AECOM will treat the cattails with a herbicide and plant willow livestakes to help initiate the process. Lack of proper easement marking (loose/crooked signage, lack of signs/posts in between distant corners, lack of corner posts altogether, poor visibility of low posts along easement edges, accuracy of some corner/line locations). The site needs to be marked to stewardship standards before the project closes out. AECOM will replace/update the existing easement posts and signage with a combination of wooden posts and taller t-posts to meet DMS standards. Erosion - recent storm-induced damage on UT1b. AECOM indicates planned repair for 2019. Please confirm. AECOM will be repairing the erosion that has occurred at the log sill toward the lower end of Tributary 1B. Geotextile matting will be placed in the scour area and the hole backfilled with soil and rock. A log sill will be installed in the floodplain immediately upstream of the scour hole to redirect flows during flood events to help alleviate stress on the area. Please confirm transducer locations are accurately mapped on the CCPV. Transducer locations have been confirmed and updated locations are shown on the CCPV that was submitted with the MY 4 report. To Harry Tsomides, DMS Project Manager Page 1 CC Subject Tributaries of Wickers Branch – 10/16/2018 Site Visit Comments From Ron Johnson Date January 23, 2019 2 4-wheeler paths and minor access road incursions, Reach 1B. AECOM will evaluate the areas to determine if they are still being used by 4-wheelers. The access roads were present in the wooded areas of the easement when the easements were purchased and are slowly becoming overgrown. Additional signage will be installed in the access roads to notify 4- wheelers that a restricted buffer is present. AECOM will also discuss the use of 4-wheelers in the easement with the landowner. Stream mapping – It appears trib 4 may be migrating out of the easement before reentering it; this will need to be analyzed and rectified if necessary since any streams outside the easement will not yield assets. This should not be an issue with asset generation. The very upper portion of Tributary 4 (shown in black) is not included in the asset calculations. As shown on the figure to the left only the lower 631 feet of Tributary 4 is generating credits (highlighted in green). The Asset map submitted with the MY4 report was updated to more accurately reflect which portions of Tributaries 3 and 4 are generating assets. Easement encroachment – Clipping of crossing corners. What is being done to rectify this? This was noted in the MY03 report as an issue in progress with the landowner. What is the current status? During project development AECOM established 3 equipment crossing to allow for access to the adjacent fields by the farmer that leases the land from the landowner. These crossings were established at the top of Tributary 1A, top of Tributary 2, and at the bottom of Tributary 3. Historically clipping has occurred at all three crossings. Following discussions with the farmer and the installation of additional signage clippage at Tributary 3 is no longer occurring. There has been some clippage at the northeast corner of Tributary 1A. This has been due to lack of adequate signage and the farmer not knowing/aware of where the corner was. AECOM had difficulty installing adequate signage in this area due to the hardness of ground. A wooden post was installed in this area in the Fall of 2018 and should eliminate the encroachment. The post will be “updated” with 3 a taller post this winter/spring when other boundary markers are upgraded. The crossing at the top of Tributary 2 remains problematic. A 35 wide easement was established at this crossing during the early stages of site development. When the easement was established AECOM assumed that the edge of the property was the edge of the treeline. The easement boundary was established in CAD prior to surveying the easement in the field. When the easement was finally surveyed and marked in the field it became apparent that there was not enough room between the edge of the easement and the treeline for the farmer to cross the easement with his equipment. The photo below depicts that combines that the farmer utilizes to harvest crops on the property . 4 The above photo depicts the location of the corner of the easement at the top of Tributary 2 in relation to the treeline. The Yellow Line is the far (northeast) corner of the easement and the wood post with the sign is he northwest corner. There is sufficient room at the northeast corner but not at the southeast corner. The photo below shows the farm equipment crossing the easement. 5 Expanding (or clearing) the crossing to the property line to allow for full use of the crossing would require removal of several large trees. AECOM would like permission to modify the easement to allow adequate room for the equipment. We would work with the farmer to determine the exact distance but anticipate that it would look something like the photo above. The above photo shows reducing the length of the easement by about 35 feet on one side and maintaining it on the other. This would reduce the easement by about 1530 square feet or 0.035 acre. It should be noted that the easement in this area is not actually buffering an asset. Tributary 2 is an ephemeral feature that does not generate any stream credits. Another option would be to not physically change the easement but just allow the area to continue to be cleared by the farmer. It would remain grassed or overgrown but no trees would end up growing on it. AECOM would like to discuss these options with DMS personnel in depth to determine a possible solution.