20200306 Ver 1_PCN Form Submission_20200225

DWR
mrlslon of Water Resources
Pre -Construction Notification (PCN) Form
September 29, 2018 Ver 3
Initial Review
Has this project met the requirements for acceptance in to the review process?*
6 Yes
r No
Is this project a public transportation project?*
G Yes r No
Change only if needed.
BIMS # Assigned
20200306
Is a payment required for this project?*
r No payment required
6 Fee received
r Fee needed - send electronic notification
Select Project Reviewer*
Rob Ridings:eads\rgridings
Information for Initial Review
1a. Name of project:
Replacement of Bridge 216 over Buffalo Creek on SR 2366 (Old Battle Bridge Road)
1a. Who is the Primary Contact?*
Christopher Murray
1b. Primary Contact Email:*
[e-mail]
Date Submitted
2/25/2020
Nearest Body of Water
Buffalo Creek
Basin
Neuse
Water Classification
B; NSW 27-57-16-(2)
Site Coordinates
Latitude: Longitude:
35.79896-78.40464
A. Processing Information
County (or Counties) where the project is located:
Wake
Is this project a public transportation project?*
/: Yes r No
Is this a NCDOT Project?*
IT Yes r No
(NCDOT only) T.I.P. or state project number:
WBS # (1)
17BP.5.R.79
1a. Type (a) of approval sought from the Corps:
Version#*
1
Reviewing Office*
Central Office - [phone]
1c. Primary Contact Phone:*
[phone]
v

W Section 404 Permit (wetlands, streams and waters, Clean Water Act)
r Section 10 Permit (navigable waters, tidal waters, Rivers and Harbors Act)
1b. What type(s) of permit(s) do you wish to seek authorization?
W Nationwide Permit (NWP)
r Regional General Permit (RGP)
r Standard (IP)
1c. Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps?
r Yes r No
Nationwide Permit (NWP) Number: 03 - Maintenance
NWP Numbers (for multiple NWPS):
1d. Type(s) of approval sought from the DWR:
W 401 Water Quality Certification - Regular
r Non-404 Jurisdictional General Permit
r Individual Permit
le. Is this notification solely for the record because written approval is not required?
For the record only for DWR401 Certification:
For the record only for Corps Permit:
r 401 Water Quality Certification - Express
FJ Riparian Buffer Authorization
1f. Is this an after -the -fact permit application?*
r Yes r No
1g. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for mitigation of impacts?
r Yes r No
1g. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for mitigation of impacts?
r Yes r No
Acceptance Letter Attachment
1h. Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties?
r Yes r No
1j. Is the project located in a designated trout watershed?
r Yes r No
B. Applicant Information
1d. Who is applying for the permit?
V Owner r Applicant (other than owner)
le. Is there an Agent/Consultant for this project?*
r Yes r No
2. Owner Information
2a. Name(s) on recorded deed:
Elizabeth Anderson Beckert, BW & G Group, LLC, William M. Womble, Jr.
2b. Deed book and page no.:
2c. Responsible party:
North Carolina Department of Transportation
2d.Address
Street Address
2612 N. Duke Street
Address Line 2
city
Durham
Rostal / Zip Code
27704
2e. Telephone Number:
[phone]
2g. Email Address:*
State / Rovince / Rion
NC
Country
USA
2f. Fax Number
r Yes r No
r Yes r No

[e-mail]
C. Project Information and Prior Project History
1. Project Information
1b. Subdivision name:
ff appropriate)
1c. Nearest municipality/ town:
Wendell
Project Identification
2a. Property Identification Number:
1774653625;1774761247 and1774665953
2c. Project Address
Street Address
622 Old Battle Bridge Road
Address Line 2
CKY
Wendell
Postal / Zip Code
27591
3. Surface Waters
3a. Name of the nearest body of water to proposed project:*
Buffalo Creek
3b. Water Resources Classification of nearest receiving water:*
B; NSW 27-57-16-(2)
3c. What river basin(s) is your project located in?*
Neuse
3d. Please provide the 12-digit HUC in which the project is located.
030202011502
4. Project Description and History
2b. Property size:
3.54
State / Province / legion
North Carolina
Country
USA
4a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this application:*
Existing land use is all wooded land in the nearby vicinity of the bridge. The existing bridge and adjacent roadway have been closed since 2011.
4b. Have Corps permits or DWR certifications been obtained for this project (including all prior phases) in the past?*
r Yes r No r Unknown
4d. Attach an 8 1/2 X 11 excerpt from the most recent version of the USGS topographic map indicating the location of the project site. (for DWR)
17BP.5.R.79 USGS topo map.pdf 1.25MB
4e. Attach an 8 1/2 X 11 excerpt from the most recent version of the published County NRCS Soil Survey map depicting the project site. (for DWR)
17BP.5.R.79 Wake County Soil Survey map.pdf 1.39MB
4f. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property:
0.06
4g. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams on the property:
275 feet
4h. Explain the purpose of the proposed project:*
Replacement of structurally deficient bridge currently closed to traffic.
41. Describe the overall project in detail, including indirect impacts and the type of equipment to be used:*
Project will involve removal and demolition of existing bridge with timber vertical abutments. The existing bridge is a 2 @ 25.3 foot timber floor on salvaged I -beams with timber caps on
timber piles and abutments. The proposed structure is a 1 @ 50 foot and 1 @ 35 foot 21-inch cored slab with 2.5 foot caps. Interior structural component comprised of drilled shaft
bents. Equipment will include grader, bull dozer, excavator, mini excavator, crane, etc.
4j. Please upload project drawings for the proposed project.
5. Jurisdictional Determinations
5a. Have the wetlands or streams been delineated on the property or proposed impact areas?*
r Yes r No O Unknown
U
Comments:

5b. If the Corps made a jurisdictional determination, what type of determination was made?*
r Preliminary r Approved r Not Verified r Unknown f N/A
Corps AID Number:
SAW-2017-00853
5c. If 5a is yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas?
Name (if known): Heather Smith and David Cooper
Agency/Consultant Company: Ecological Engineering (now part of VHB)
Other:
5d. List the dates of the Corp jurisdiction determination or State determination if a determination was made bythe Corps or DWR
September 27, 2017
5d1. Jurisdictional determination upload
17BP.5.R.79 Wake PJD.pdf 128.36KB
17BP.5.R.79 Wake PJD form.pdf 129.93KB
17BP.5.R.79 approved Jurisdictional Features Wake216.pdf 3.14MB
6. Future Project Plans
6a. Is this a phased project?*
r Yes r No
Are any other NWP(s), regional general permit(s), or individual permits(s) used, or intended to be used, to authorize any part of the proposed project or related activity?
D. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
1a. Where are the impacts associated with your project? (check all that apply):
P Wetlands W Streams -tributaries P Buffers
r Open Waters r Pond Construction
2. Wetland Impacts
2a1 Reason (?) �t�e2b. Impact type * (?) of W. 2d. W. name * 2e. Forested* 2f. Type of 2g. Impact
Jurisdicition*(?) area*
1
Roadway fill
P
Riverine Swamp Forest
Perm Fill
Yes
Both
0.020
(acres)
1
Mechanized clearing
P
rv.rine Swamp Forest
Mech Fill
Yes
Both
0.040
(acres)
2g. Total Temporary Wetland Impact
0.000
2g. Total Wetland Impact
0.060
2h. Comments:
Project results in 0.02 ac permanent fill in wetland and 0.04 ac mechanized clearing in wetland.
3. Stream Impacts
2g. Total Permanent Wetland Impact
0.060
3a. Reason for impact (?) 3b.lmpact type * 3c. Type of impact* �3�name* ��3e. Stream Type* 3f. Type of ff��
3h. Impact
(?) Jurisdiction* length*
S1
Bank Stabilization
Permanent
Bank Stabilization J
Buffalo Creek
Perennial
Both
30
Average (feet)
93
(linearfeet)
S2
Temporary Dewatering
Temporary
Dewatering
Buffalo Creek
Perennial
Both
30
Average (feet)
104
(lir�rfeet)
3i. Total jurisdictional ditch impact in square feet:
0
3i. Total permanent stream impacts: 3i. Total temporary stream impacts:
93 104

31. Total stream and ditch impacts:
197
3j. Comments:
Note that wasting channel impacts permanent and ebsting channel impacts temporary are coincident.
6. Buffer Impacts (for DWR)
6a. Project is in which protect basin(s)?
Check all that apply.
W Neuse j— Tar -Pamlico
r Catawba r Randleman
r Goose Creek r Jordan Lake
r Other
b. Impact Type 6c. Per or Temp 6d. Stream name 6e. Buffer mitigation required? 6f. Zone 1 impact 6g. Zone 2 impact
Jlowable P Buffalo Creek No 5,610 3,541
6h. Total buffer impacts:
.... .......
Zone 1 Zone 2
Total Temporary impacts: 0.00 0.00
Zone 1
Zone 2
Total Permanent impacts: 5,610.00
3,541.00
Zone 1
Zone 2
Total combined buffer impacts: 5,610.00
3,541.00
6i. Comments:
Supporting Documentation
910216_Permit Drawings_20200225.pdf
910216_Permit Drawings_ BUFFER_20200225.pdf
E. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
2.13MB
924.14KB
u
1a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing the project:
Fill slopes have been steepened to 2:1 in wetlands to minimize impacts. Only the smallest amount of wetland and stream impact has been permitted to
construct a stable roadway and bridge. The temporary causeway was sized to provide minimal access to install the interior drilled shafts.
1b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques:
Measures to minimize construction of impervious dikes and temporary causeways will be determined in the field based on ebsting field conditions. Only
the smallest amount of fill necessary to construct a stable roadway and bridge will be allowed during construction of this project.
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State?
r Yes r No
2b. If this project DOES NOT require Compensatory Mitigation, explain why:
Stream, wetland and riparian buffer impacts to not reach thresholds to require mitigation for this bridge replacement project.
F. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWR)
1. Diffuse Flow Plan
1a. Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
r Yes r No
What type of SCM are you providing?

r Level Spreader
r Vegetated Conveyance (lower SHWT)
r Wetland Swale (higher SMNT)
r Other SCM that removes minimum 30 % nitrogen
W Proposed project will not create concentrated stormwater flow through the buffer
Diffuse Flow Documentation
910216 Stormwater Management Plan.pdf
2. Stormwater Management Plan
2a. Is this a NCDOT project subject to compliance with NCDOT's Individual NPDES permit NCS000250?*
r Yes r No
Comments:
Yes
G. Supplementary Information
1. Environmental Documentation
104.52KB
1a. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the use of public (federal/state) land?*
r Yes r No
1b. If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State (North Carolina)
Environmental Policy Act (NEPAUSEPA)?*
r Yes r No
1c. If you answered "yes" to the above, has the document review been finalized bythe State Clearing House?*
r Yes r No
Comments:*
Minimum Criteria Determination Checklist does not get sent to the State Clearing House.
2. Violations (DWR Requirement)
2a. Is the site in violation of DWR Water Quality Certification Rules (15ANCAC 2H .0500), Isolated Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 21-1.1300), or DWR Surface Water or Wetland Standards or
Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)?*
r Yes r No
3. Cumulative Impacts (DWR Requirement)
3a. Will this project result in additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?*
r Yes r No
3b. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
The purpose of this project is to replace a structurally deficient bridge. The roadway and bridge have been designed to allow for two way traffic with a
left turning lane on the bridge deck at the intersection. The Department has recently been advised of a large proposed development (multiple homes)
on the Elizabeth Anderson Beckert property. This development has not had a significant impact on the project design.
4. Sewage Disposal (DWR Requirement)
4a. Is sewage disposal required by DWR for this project?*
r Yes r Nor WA
5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or habitat?*
r Yes r No
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act impacts?*
r Yes r No
5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted.
Raleigh
5d. Is another Federal agency involved?*
r Yes r No
5e. Is this a DOT project located within Division's 1-8?
r Yes r No
r Unknown
5j. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical Habitat?

Use of the Revised Programmatic Biological/Conference Opinion for Bridge and Culvert Replacements/Repairs/Rehabilitations in Eastern North
Carolina, NCDOT Divisions 1-8 (September 11, 2019), on -site surveys for Michaux's sumac, aquatic mussels, Neuse River waterdog, Carolina
madtom, RCW and Bald eagle.
Consultation Documentation Upload
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as an Essential Fish Habitat?*
r Yes r No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact an Essential Fish Habitat?*
Available mapping.
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation status?*
r Yes r No
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?*
Consultation with Renee -Gledhill Early (State Historic Preservation Office representative), Shelby Reap (NCDOT) and Shane Petersen (NCDOT). The
project as designed will result in No Adverse Effect to the Hood -Anderson Farm (WA2021). Also, coordination with the Catawba Indian Nation.
7c. Historic or Prehistoric Information Upload
16-09-0011Updated EffectsSigned.pdf 6.39MB
AR16-09-0011 NoSitesPresentRevisit2.pdf 25.86MB
Catawba Indian Nation letter.pdf 248.7KB
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA-designated 100-year floodplain?*
r Yes r No
8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements:
Project has been designed using Detailed methods.
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination?*
NCDOT Stormwater Management Plan
Miscellaneous
Comments
Miscellaneous attachments not previously requested.
Environmental summary for USACE.pdf 131.66KB
Signature
*
W By checking the box and signing below, I certify that
• I have given true, accurate, and complete information on this form;
• I agree that submission of this PCN form is a "transaction" subject to Chapter 66, Article 40 of the NC General Statutes (the "Uniform Electronic Transactions Act");
• I agree to conduct this transaction by electronic means pursuant to Chapter 66, Article 40 of the NC General Statutes (the "Uniform Electronic Transactions Act");
I understand that an electronic signature has the same legal effect and can be enforced in the same way as a written signature; AND
• I intend to electronically sign and submit the PCN form.
Full Name:
Christopher A. Murray
Signature
Grf�+s 441)44Y
Date
2/25/2020
U
V