HomeMy WebLinkAbout20191699 Ver 1_More Information Received_20200226SYnF.
Staff Review
Does this application have all the attachments needed to accept it into the review process?
(-- Yes C No
ID#* Version*
20191699
Is this project a public transportation project?* C Yes
r No
Reviewer List:* Stephanie Goss: eads\szgoss
Select Reviewing Office:* Raleigh Regional Office - (919) 791-4200
Does this project require a request for payment to be sent?*
C
Yes
No
Project Submittal Form
Please note: fields marked with a red asterisk below are required. You will not be able to submit the form until all
mandatory questions are answered.
Project Type: r
New Project
r
New Project w Existing ID
r
Pre -Application Submittal
r
More Information Response
r
Other Agency Comments
r
For the Record Only (Courtesy Copy)
r
Stream or Buffer Appeal
New Project - Please check the new project type if you are trying to submit a new project that needs an official approval
decision.
Pre -Application Submittal - Please check the pre -application submittal if you just want feedback on your submittal and
do not have the expectation that your submittal will be considered a complete application requiring a formal decision.
More Information Response - Please check this type if you are responding to a request for information from staff and
you have and ID# and version for this response.
Other Agency Comments - Please check this if you are submitting comments on an existing project.
Is this supplemental information that needs to be sent to the Corps?*
r Yes r No
Project Contact Information
Name: Who is submtting the inforrration?
Email Address: brownenvgrp@gmail.com
Project Information
Existing ID #: Existing Version:
20191699 1
20170001(no dashes)
Project Name: Everwood 2
Is this a public transportation project?
r Yes
r No
Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)?
r Yes r No r Unknown
County (ies)
Johnston
Please upload all files that need to be submited.
Oickthe upload button or drag and drop files here to attach document
Reply to Chris's comments.pdf 137.91 KB
IPaC_ Explore Location.pdf 488.59KB
Everwood Various lots 43-45, 54, 55, 69-77, 81, 82,
9.22MB
and 93S..pdf
Master Plans.pdf 2.2MB
Only pdt or Iv17 files are accepted.
Describe the attachments:
SAW-2019-00882, Reply to COE comments on January 9, 2020. Attached includes 1) Written reply to
comments 2) IPaC list of possible endangered species 3) Lots of concern with wetlands showing on -site
sewage lines 4) Master plan of S/D showing utilities.
Sign and Submit
P By checking the box and signing box below, I certify that:
• I have given true, accurate, and complete information on this form;
• I agree that submission of this form is a "transaction" subject to Chapter 66, Article 40 of the NC General Statutes (the
"Uniform Electronic Transactions Act")
• I agree to conduct this transaction by electronic means pursuant to Chapter 66, Article 40 of the NC General Statutes
(the "Uniform Electronic Transactions Act");
• I understand that an electronic signature has the same legal effect and can be enforced in the same way as a written
signature; AND
• I intend to electronically sign and submit the online form."
Signature:
Submittal Date: Is filled in automatically.
AW-2019-00882 / Everwood Subdivision Phase II /
Johnston County - INCOMPLETE NOTIFICATION
Inbox x
Hopper, Christopher D CIV (USA) <Christopher.D.Hopper@usace.army.mil>
Thu, Jan 9,
4:12 PM
to me, Andrew
Good Afternoon, Wyatt:
(Answers to your questions/comments are in red below)
Thanks for your time this afternoon. Per our conversation, the Pre-construction
Notification (PCN) for the proposed Everwood Subdivision - Phase II (SAW-2019-
00882), dated December 11, 2019 is incomplete. To facilitate our documentation of the
proposed project's compliance with requirements and conditions for use of Nationwide
Permit 29, please provide the following information:
1) NWP General Condition 15: Single and Complete Project,
a. Please provide either construction or grading plans to demonstrate that lots
and their individual septic systems would be constructed without crossing stream and/or
wetland areas, or include these crossings in this application. Report unavoidable
crossings with both construction (temporary) and access (permanent/maintenance).
i. Based on our conversation earlier today, I've attempted to identify lots
that appear to require wetland crossings. Those include 43-45, 53-55, 69-77, 81, 82,
and 93S.
The attached set of construction plans shows layouts for these lots. Please note:
any possible impact with wetlands by sewage lines will be avoided by directional
boring.
b. An explanation of how cumulative impacts will be avoided on this
project in the future (e.g. methods to avoid impacts may include deed restrictions,
conservation easements, etc).
To avoid cumulative impacts we will show the approved wetland line on all plots
and the recorded map. A note will be added by the PLS stating the wetlands are
federally proteted any impact must first be approved by the US Army Corps of
Engineers.
c. Identify water and power utility tie-ins on project plans.
The revised set of construction plans have been attached.
2) A preliminary jurisdictional determination is on file for this phase of the
Everwood Subdivision (Phase II), but we are unable to locate mapping for Phase
I. If a determination or delineation concurrence has been provided on Phase I,
please forward that for our records. Per our conversation, I'll look at the calendar
and look for a date we can schedule a site visit for this site and the Barnes
Landing site just east of this project.
As already discussed, the earlier phase was called South Branch (2017) and was
sent to you on January 9, 2020.
3) The PCN application states that no federally protected species or habitat
occurs in or near the project, but that the USFWS has not been contacted. A
review of the USFWS IPaC website identifies several federally protected species
potentially affected by activities in this location. Please visit the USFWS IPaC
website and provide text justification for the claim no impacts would result
(https://ecos.fws.gov/ipac/location/index). We will use this information in our
request to USFWS for concurrence with this project.
I checked the IPaC website and have attached their resource list.
Red-cockaded Woodpecker-The red cockaded woodpecker “The red-cockaded
woodpecker makes its home in mature pine forests… generally over 80 years
old.” Our construction site where the S/D is going was logged ~3 years ago. The
woodland left is around the riparian areas and is a mixture of hardwood and
some pines. The pines are not old growth pines. No habitat no effect.
Neuse River Waterdog- “Are found in streams ranging from larger headwater
streams in the Piedmont to coastal streams up to the point of saltwater intrusion.
None have been found in lakes or ponds.” The 2 major streams on the property
drain directly to a pond with a dam. No habitat, no effect.
Carolina Madtom-“ prefer clean water with permanent flow and are not tolerant
of siltation and turbidity.” We do not have any stream impacts and the streams
are first order and flow into a pond. No habitat, no effect.
Dwarf Wedgemussel- “Impoundments (dams), channelization projects, and in-
stream dredging operations directly eliminate habitat”. No habitat due to the large
pond, no affect.
Yellow Lance-“This species is most common in streams and rivers inhabiting
sandy to coarse sandy areas and sometimes gravels, but does not appear to
tolerate fine sediments.” As stated there will be no impact to existing streams, the
2 existing streams in our project area are first order streams with muddy, silty
bottoms and both drain into a pond. No habitat, no effect.
Michaux's Sumac-“ Michaux's sumac grows in sandy or rocky open woods in
association with basic soils.” The area was logged approximately 3 years ago, I
have been over the area and saw no signs of Michaux’s Sumac.
Please provide the requested information within 30 days, or your application will
be withdrawn. Feel free to contact me with any questions or concerns.
Replies in red From Wyatt Brown, February 26, 2020
EVERWOOD DRIVE
50' PUBLIC R/W
FOR
EVERWOOD SUBDIVISION - PHASE II
ELEVATION TOWNSHIP - JOHNSTON COUNTY, N.C.
WETLAND IMPACT MAP
Sheet:
Revision:
File:
Job:Date:
Drawn:
and Associates, P. A.
Dalton Engineering
(919)550-4740
Fax (919) 550-4741
446 East Main Street
Clayton, NC 27520
P.O. Box 426
NC
H
W
Y
2
1
0
-
60'
P
U
B
L
I
C
R
/
W
MAHOGANY WAY50'
PUBL
IC
R
/WMAHOGANY WAY - 50' PUBLIC R/WSTREET "A
"
-
5
0
'
P
U
B
L
I
C
R
/
W
STREET "B" - 50' PUBLIC R/WWETLAND IMPACT AREA #1 AND #2
WETLAND IMPACT AREA #3
WETLAND IMPACTS
IMPACT AREA #AREA (SQ.FT. / ACRE)
1 1,530 SF / 0.0351 AC.
2 612 SF / 0.014 AC.
3 587 SF / 0.0134 AC.
TOTAL 2,729 SF / 0.0625 AC.
1/27/2020 IPaC: Explore Location
https://ecos.fws.gov/ipac/location/TQUCBZ2S7ZEE7GVQYH2UO7ML4M/resources 1/14
IPaC resource list
This report is an automatically generated list of species and other resources such as critical habitat (collectively referred to as
trust resources) under the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service's (USFWS) jurisdiction that are known or expected to be on or near
the project area referenced below. The list may also include trust resources that occur outside of the project area, but that
could potentially be directly or indirectly a ected by activities in the project area. However, determining the likelihood and
extent of e ects a project may have on trust resources typically requires gathering additional site-speci c (e.g.,
vegetation/species surveys) and project-speci c (e.g., magnitude and timing of proposed activities) information.
Below is a summary of the project information you provided and contact information for the USFWS o ce(s) with jurisdiction
in the de ned project area. Please read the introduction to each section that follows (Endangered Species, Migratory Birds,
USFWS Facilities, and NWI Wetlands) for additional information applicable to the trust resources addressed in that section.
Location
Johnston County, North Carolina
U.S. Fish & Wildlife ServiceIPaC
1/27/2020 IPaC: Explore Location
https://ecos.fws.gov/ipac/location/TQUCBZ2S7ZEE7GVQYH2UO7ML4M/resources 2/14
Local o ce
Raleigh Ecological Services Field O ce
(919) 856-4520
(919) 856-4556
MAILING ADDRESS
Post O ce Box 33726
Raleigh, NC 27636-3726
PHYSICAL ADDRESS
551 Pylon Drive, Suite F
Raleigh, NC 27606-1487
1/27/2020 IPaC: Explore Location
https://ecos.fws.gov/ipac/location/TQUCBZ2S7ZEE7GVQYH2UO7ML4M/resources 3/14
Endangered species
This resource list is for informational purposes only and does not constitute an analysis of project level impacts.
The primary information used to generate this list is the known or expected range of each species. Additional areas of
in uence (AOI) for species are also considered. An AOI includes areas outside of the species range if the species could be
indirectly a ected by activities in that area (e.g., placing a dam upstream of a sh population, even if that sh does not occur
at the dam site, may indirectly impact the species by reducing or eliminating water ow downstream). Because species can
move, and site conditions can change, the species on this list are not guaranteed to be found on or near the project area. To
fully determine any potential e ects to species, additional site-speci c and project-speci c information is often required.
Section 7 of the Endangered Species Act requires Federal agencies to "request of the Secretary information whether any
species which is listed or proposed to be listed may be present in the area of such proposed action" for any project that is
conducted, permitted, funded, or licensed by any Federal agency. A letter from the local o ce and a species list which ful lls
this requirement can only be obtained by requesting an o cial species list from either the Regulatory Review section in IPaC
(see directions below) or from the local eld o ce directly.
For project evaluations that require USFWS concurrence/review, please return to the IPaC website and request an o cial
species list by doing the following:
1. Draw the project location and click CONTINUE.
2. Click DEFINE PROJECT.
3. Log in (if directed to do so).
4. Provide a name and description for your project.
5. Click REQUEST SPECIES LIST.
Listed species and their critical habitats are managed by the Ecological Services Program of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
(USFWS) and the sheries division of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA Fisheries ).
Species and critical habitats under the sole responsibility of NOAA Fisheries are not shown on this list. Please contact NOAA
Fisheries for species under their jurisdiction.
1
2
1/27/2020 IPaC: Explore Location
https://ecos.fws.gov/ipac/location/TQUCBZ2S7ZEE7GVQYH2UO7ML4M/resources 4/14
1. Species listed under the Endangered Species Act are threatened or endangered; IPaC also shows species that are
candidates, or proposed, for listing. See the listing status page for more information.
2. NOAA Fisheries, also known as the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), is an o ce of the National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration within the Department of Commerce.
The following species are potentially a ected by activities in this location:
Birds
Amphibians
Fishes
Clams
NAME STATUS
Red-cockaded Woodpecker Picoides borealis
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/7614
Endangered
NAME STATUS
Neuse River Waterdog Necturus lewisi
There is proposed critical habitat for this species. Your location is outside the critical
habitat.
https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/6772
Proposed Threatened
NAME STATUS
Carolina Madtom Noturus furiosus
There is proposed critical habitat for this species. Your location is outside the critical
habitat.
https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/528
Proposed Endangered
NAME STATUS
1/27/2020 IPaC: Explore Location
https://ecos.fws.gov/ipac/location/TQUCBZ2S7ZEE7GVQYH2UO7ML4M/resources 5/14
Flowering Plants
Critical habitats
Potential e ects to critical habitat(s) in this location must be analyzed along with the endangered species themselves.
THERE ARE NO CRITICAL HABITATS AT THIS LOCATION.
Migratory birds
Atlantic Pigtoe Fusconaia masoni
There is proposed critical habitat for this species. Your location is outside the critical
habitat.
https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/5164
Proposed Threatened
Dwarf Wedgemussel Alasmidonta heterodon
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/784
Endangered
Yellow Lance Elliptio lanceolata
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/4511
Threatened
NAME STATUS
Michaux's Sumac Rhus michauxii
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/5217
Endangered
Certain birds are protected under the Migratory Bird Treaty Act and the Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act .1 2
1/27/2020 IPaC: Explore Location
https://ecos.fws.gov/ipac/location/TQUCBZ2S7ZEE7GVQYH2UO7ML4M/resources 6/14
The birds listed below are birds of particular concern either because they occur on the USFWS Birds of Conservation Concern
(BCC) list or warrant special attention in your project location. To learn more about the levels of concern for birds on your list
and how this list is generated, see the FAQ below. This is not a list of every bird you may nd in this location, nor a guarantee
that every bird on this list will be found in your project area. To see exact locations of where birders and the general public
have sighted birds in and around your project area, visit the E-bird data mapping tool (Tip: enter your location, desired date
range and a species on your list). For projects that occur o the Atlantic Coast, additional maps and models detailing the
relative occurrence and abundance of bird species on your list are available. Links to additional information about Atlantic
Coast birds, and other important information about your migratory bird list, including how to properly interpret and use your
migratory bird report, can be found below.
For guidance on when to schedule activities or implement avoidance and minimization measures to reduce impacts to
migratory birds on your list, click on the PROBABILITY OF PRESENCE SUMMARY at the top of your list to see when these birds
are most likely to be present and breeding in your project area.
Any person or organization who plans or conducts activities that may result in impacts to migratory birds, eagles, and their
habitats should follow appropriate regulations and consider implementing appropriate conservation measures, as described
below.
1. The Migratory Birds Treaty Act of 1918.
2. The Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act of 1940.
Additional information can be found using the following links:
Birds of Conservation Concern http://www.fws.gov/birds/management/managed-species/
birds-of-conservation-concern.php
Measures for avoiding and minimizing impacts to birds http://www.fws.gov/birds/management/project-assessment-tools-
and-guidance/
conservation-measures.php
Nationwide conservation measures for birds
http://www.fws.gov/migratorybirds/pdf/management/nationwidestandardconservationmeasures.pdf
NAME BREEDING SEASON (IF A BREEDING
SEASON IS INDICATED FOR A BIRD ON
YOUR LIST, THE BIRD MAY BREED IN YOUR
PROJECT AREA SOMETIME WITHIN THE
1/27/2020 IPaC: Explore Location
https://ecos.fws.gov/ipac/location/TQUCBZ2S7ZEE7GVQYH2UO7ML4M/resources 7/14
Probability of Presence Summary
The graphs below provide our best understanding of when birds of concern are most likely to be present in your project
area. This information can be used to tailor and schedule your project activities to avoid or minimize impacts to birds. Please
make sure you read and understand the FAQ “Proper Interpretation and Use of Your Migratory Bird Report” before using or
attempting to interpret this report.
TIMEFRAME SPECIFIED, WHICH IS A VERY
LIBERAL ESTIMATE OF THE DATES INSIDE
WHICH THE BIRD BREEDS ACROSS ITS
ENTIRE RANGE. "BREEDS ELSEWHERE"
INDICATES THAT THE BIRD DOES NOT
LIKELY BREED IN YOUR PROJECT AREA.)
Prairie Warbler Dendroica discolor
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the continental USA
and Alaska.
Breeds May 1 to Jul 31
Prothonotary Warbler Protonotaria citrea
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the continental USA
and Alaska.
Breeds Apr 1 to Jul 31
Red-headed Woodpecker Melanerpes erythrocephalus
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the continental USA
and Alaska.
Breeds May 10 to Sep 10
Rusty Blackbird Euphagus carolinus
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the continental USA
and Alaska.
Breeds elsewhere
Wood Thrush Hylocichla mustelina
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the continental USA
and Alaska.
Breeds May 10 to Aug 31
1/27/2020 IPaC: Explore Location
https://ecos.fws.gov/ipac/location/TQUCBZ2S7ZEE7GVQYH2UO7ML4M/resources 8/14
Probability of Presence ()
Each green bar represents the bird's relative probability of presence in the 10km grid cell(s) your project overlaps during a
particular week of the year. (A year is represented as 12 4-week months.) A taller bar indicates a higher probability of species
presence. The survey e ort (see below) can be used to establish a level of con dence in the presence score. One can have
higher con dence in the presence score if the corresponding survey e ort is also high.
How is the probability of presence score calculated? The calculation is done in three steps:
1. The probability of presence for each week is calculated as the number of survey events in the week where the species was
detected divided by the total number of survey events for that week. For example, if in week 12 there were 20 survey
events and the Spotted Towhee was found in 5 of them, the probability of presence of the Spotted Towhee in week 12 is
0.25.
2. To properly present the pattern of presence across the year, the relative probability of presence is calculated. This is the
probability of presence divided by the maximum probability of presence across all weeks. For example, imagine the
probability of presence in week 20 for the Spotted Towhee is 0.05, and that the probability of presence at week 12 (0.25) is
the maximum of any week of the year. The relative probability of presence on week 12 is 0.25/0.25 = 1; at week 20 it is
0.05/0.25 = 0.2.
3. The relative probability of presence calculated in the previous step undergoes a statistical conversion so that all possible
values fall between 0 and 10, inclusive. This is the probability of presence score.
To see a bar's probability of presence score, simply hover your mouse cursor over the bar.
Breeding Season ()
Yellow bars denote a very liberal estimate of the time-frame inside which the bird breeds across its entire range. If there are
no yellow bars shown for a bird, it does not breed in your project area.
Survey E ort ()
Vertical black lines superimposed on probability of presence bars indicate the number of surveys performed for that species
in the 10km grid cell(s) your project area overlaps. The number of surveys is expressed as a range, for example, 33 to 64
surveys.
To see a bar's survey e ort range, simply hover your mouse cursor over the bar.
No Data ()
A week is marked as having no data if there were no survey events for that week.
Survey Timeframe
1/27/2020 IPaC: Explore Location
https://ecos.fws.gov/ipac/location/TQUCBZ2S7ZEE7GVQYH2UO7ML4M/resources 9/14
no data survey e ort breeding season probability of presence
Surveys from only the last 10 years are used in order to ensure delivery of currently relevant information. The exception to
this is areas o the Atlantic coast, where bird returns are based on all years of available data, since data in these areas is
currently much more sparse.
SPECIES JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC
Prairie Warbler
BCC Rangewide (CON) (This
is a Bird of Conservation
Concern (BCC) throughout
its range in the continental
USA and Alaska.)
Prothonotary Warbler
BCC Rangewide (CON) (This
is a Bird of Conservation
Concern (BCC) throughout
its range in the continental
USA and Alaska.)
Red-headed
Woodpecker
BCC Rangewide (CON) (This
is a Bird of Conservation
Concern (BCC) throughout
its range in the continental
USA and Alaska.)
Rusty Blackbird
BCC Rangewide (CON) (This
is a Bird of Conservation
Concern (BCC) throughout
its range in the continental
USA and Alaska.)
Wood Thrush
BCC Rangewide (CON) (This
is a Bird of Conservation
Concern (BCC) throughout
its range in the continental
USA and Alaska.)
Tell me more about conservation measures I can implement to avoid or minimize impacts to migratory birds.
1/27/2020 IPaC: Explore Location
https://ecos.fws.gov/ipac/location/TQUCBZ2S7ZEE7GVQYH2UO7ML4M/resources 10/14
Nationwide Conservation Measures describes measures that can help avoid and minimize impacts to all birds at any location year round.
Implementation of these measures is particularly important when birds are most likely to occur in the project area. When birds may be
breeding in the area, identifying the locations of any active nests and avoiding their destruction is a very helpful impact minimization measure.
To see when birds are most likely to occur and be breeding in your project area, view the Probability of Presence Summary. Additional
measures and/or permits may be advisable depending on the type of activity you are conducting and the type of infrastructure or bird species
present on your project site.
What does IPaC use to generate the migratory birds potentially occurring in my speci ed location?
The Migratory Bird Resource List is comprised of USFWS Birds of Conservation Concern (BCC) and other species that may warrant special
attention in your project location.
The migratory bird list generated for your project is derived from data provided by the Avian Knowledge Network (AKN). The AKN data is based
on a growing collection of survey, banding, and citizen science datasets and is queried and ltered to return a list of those birds reported as
occurring in the 10km grid cell(s) which your project intersects, and that have been identi ed as warranting special attention because they are a
BCC species in that area, an eagle (Eagle Act requirements may apply), or a species that has a particular vulnerability to o shore activities or
development.
Again, the Migratory Bird Resource list includes only a subset of birds that may occur in your project area. It is not representative of all birds
that may occur in your project area. To get a list of all birds potentially present in your project area, please visit the AKN Phenology Tool.
What does IPaC use to generate the probability of presence graphs for the migratory birds potentially occurring in my speci ed location?
The probability of presence graphs associated with your migratory bird list are based on data provided by the Avian Knowledge Network (AKN).
This data is derived from a growing collection of survey, banding, and citizen science datasets .
Probability of presence data is continuously being updated as new and better information becomes available. To learn more about how the
probability of presence graphs are produced and how to interpret them, go the Probability of Presence Summary and then click on the "Tell me
about these graphs" link.
How do I know if a bird is breeding, wintering, migrating or present year-round in my project area?
To see what part of a particular bird's range your project area falls within (i.e. breeding, wintering, migrating or year-round), you may refer to
the following resources: The Cornell Lab of Ornithology All About Birds Bird Guide, or (if you are unsuccessful in locating the bird of interest
there), the Cornell Lab of Ornithology Neotropical Birds guide. If a bird on your migratory bird species list has a breeding season associated with
it, if that bird does occur in your project area, there may be nests present at some point within the timeframe speci ed. If "Breeds elsewhere" is
indicated, then the bird likely does not breed in your project area.
What are the levels of concern for migratory birds?
1/27/2020 IPaC: Explore Location
https://ecos.fws.gov/ipac/location/TQUCBZ2S7ZEE7GVQYH2UO7ML4M/resources 11/14
Migratory birds delivered through IPaC fall into the following distinct categories of concern:
1. "BCC Rangewide" birds are Birds of Conservation Concern (BCC) that are of concern throughout their range anywhere within the USA
(including Hawaii, the Paci c Islands, Puerto Rico, and the Virgin Islands);
2. "BCC - BCR" birds are BCCs that are of concern only in particular Bird Conservation Regions (BCRs) in the continental USA; and
3. "Non-BCC - Vulnerable" birds are not BCC species in your project area, but appear on your list either because of the Eagle Act requirements
(for eagles) or (for non-eagles) potential susceptibilities in o shore areas from certain types of development or activities (e.g. o shore
energy development or longline shing).
Although it is important to try to avoid and minimize impacts to all birds, e orts should be made, in particular, to avoid and minimize impacts to
the birds on this list, especially eagles and BCC species of rangewide concern. For more information on conservation measures you can
implement to help avoid and minimize migratory bird impacts and requirements for eagles, please see the FAQs for these topics.
Details about birds that are potentially a ected by o shore projects
For additional details about the relative occurrence and abundance of both individual bird species and groups of bird species within your
project area o the Atlantic Coast, please visit the Northeast Ocean Data Portal. The Portal also o ers data and information about other taxa
besides birds that may be helpful to you in your project review. Alternately, you may download the bird model results les underlying the portal
maps through the NOAA NCCOS Integrative Statistical Modeling and Predictive Mapping of Marine Bird Distributions and Abundance on the
Atlantic Outer Continental Shelf project webpage.
Bird tracking data can also provide additional details about occurrence and habitat use throughout the year, including migration. Models relying
on survey data may not include this information. For additional information on marine bird tracking data, see the Diving Bird Study and the
nanotag studies or contact Caleb Spiegel or Pam Loring.
What if I have eagles on my list?
If your project has the potential to disturb or kill eagles, you may need to obtain a permit to avoid violating the Eagle Act should such impacts
occur.
Proper Interpretation and Use of Your Migratory Bird Report
The migratory bird list generated is not a list of all birds in your project area, only a subset of birds of priority concern. To learn more about how
your list is generated, and see options for identifying what other birds may be in your project area, please see the FAQ “What does IPaC use to
generate the migratory birds potentially occurring in my speci ed location”. Please be aware this report provides the “probability of presence”
of birds within the 10 km grid cell(s) that overlap your project; not your exact project footprint. On the graphs provided, please also look
carefully at the survey e ort (indicated by the black vertical bar) and for the existence of the “no data” indicator (a red horizontal bar). A high
survey e ort is the key component. If the survey e ort is high, then the probability of presence score can be viewed as more dependable. In
contrast, a low survey e ort bar or no data bar means a lack of data and, therefore, a lack of certainty about presence of the species. This list is
1/27/2020 IPaC: Explore Location
https://ecos.fws.gov/ipac/location/TQUCBZ2S7ZEE7GVQYH2UO7ML4M/resources 12/14
not perfect; it is simply a starting point for identifying what birds of concern have the potential to be in your project area, when they might be
there, and if they might be breeding (which means nests might be present). The list helps you know what to look for to con rm presence, and
helps guide you in knowing when to implement conservation measures to avoid or minimize potential impacts from your project activities,
should presence be con rmed. To learn more about conservation measures, visit the FAQ “Tell me about conservation measures I can
implement to avoid or minimize impacts to migratory birds” at the bottom of your migratory bird trust resources page.
Facilities
National Wildlife Refuge lands
Any activity proposed on lands managed by the National Wildlife Refuge system must undergo a 'Compatibility
Determination' conducted by the Refuge. Please contact the individual Refuges to discuss any questions or concerns.
THERE ARE NO REFUGE LANDS AT THIS LOCATION.
Fish hatcheries
THERE ARE NO FISH HATCHERIES AT THIS LOCATION.
Wetlands in the National Wetlands Inventory
Impacts to NWI wetlands and other aquatic habitats may be subject to regulation under Section 404 of the Clean Water Act,
or other State/Federal statutes.
For more information please contact the Regulatory Program of the local U.S. Army Corps of Engineers District.
1/27/2020 IPaC: Explore Location
https://ecos.fws.gov/ipac/location/TQUCBZ2S7ZEE7GVQYH2UO7ML4M/resources 13/14
Please note that the NWI data being shown may be out of date. We are currently working to update our NWI data set. We
recommend you verify these results with a site visit to determine the actual extent of wetlands on site.
This location overlaps the following wetlands:
Data limitations
The Service's objective of mapping wetlands and deepwater habitats is to produce reconnaissance level information on the location, type and
size of these resources. The maps are prepared from the analysis of high altitude imagery. Wetlands are identi ed based on vegetation, visible
hydrology and geography. A margin of error is inherent in the use of imagery; thus, detailed on-the-ground inspection of any particular site may
result in revision of the wetland boundaries or classi cation established through image analysis.
The accuracy of image interpretation depends on the quality of the imagery, the experience of the image analysts, the amount and quality of
the collateral data and the amount of ground truth veri cation work conducted. Metadata should be consulted to determine the date of the
source imagery used and any mapping problems.
Wetlands or other mapped features may have changed since the date of the imagery or eld work. There may be occasional di erences in
polygon boundaries or classi cations between the information depicted on the map and the actual conditions on site.
Data exclusions
Certain wetland habitats are excluded from the National mapping program because of the limitations of aerial imagery as the primary data
source used to detect wetlands. These habitats include seagrasses or submerged aquatic vegetation that are found in the intertidal and subtidal
zones of estuaries and nearshore coastal waters. Some deepwater reef communities (coral or tuber cid worm reefs) have also been excluded
from the inventory. These habitats, because of their depth, go undetected by aerial imagery.
Data precautions
FRESHWATER POND
PUBHh
PUBHx
RIVERINE
R4SBC
A full description for each wetland code can be found at the National Wetlands Inventory website
1/27/2020 IPaC: Explore Location
https://ecos.fws.gov/ipac/location/TQUCBZ2S7ZEE7GVQYH2UO7ML4M/resources 14/14
Federal, state, and local regulatory agencies with jurisdiction over wetlands may de ne and describe wetlands in a di erent manner than that
used in this inventory. There is no attempt, in either the design or products of this inventory, to de ne the limits of proprietary jurisdiction of
any Federal, state, or local government or to establish the geographical scope of the regulatory programs of government agencies. Persons
intending to engage in activities involving modi cations within or adjacent to wetland areas should seek the advice of appropriate federal, state,
or local agencies concerning speci ed agency regulatory programs and proprietary jurisdictions that may a ect such activities.