Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout20061579 Ver 1_Application_20061002n fa ~ ~~ .~~~~. STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA o~ ~~/~n,, DST U!/ o ®~ S,yN~ T~irk~u f~j' ~Mw`41~Re DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION ~,,,~, MICHAEL F. EASLEY LYNDO TIPPETT GOVERNOR SECRETARY September 27, 2006 U. S. Army Corps of Engineers Regulatory Field Office Post Office Box 1000 Washington, NC 27889-1000 O ~! ~ ~ _. (~ ~ - 5? ~~ Attention: Mr. William Wescott NCDOT Coordinator Dear Sir: p n Subject: Nationwide 23 Permit Application and Neuse River Buffer Authorization, z for the proposed replacement of Bridge 74 on SR 1615 over Branch Upper Broad O Creek (Morgan Swamp) in Craven County. Federal Aid ~'roject No. BRST ~ I 1615(2), State Project No. 8.2171301, TIP No. B-4088. ~1 ~~j~ ?j~--r [ Please find enclosed the permit drawings, Categorical Exclusion (CE) Action Classification Form, Natural Resource Technical Report (NRTR) Executive Summary, and half-size plan sheets C for the above referenced project. The North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT) proposes to replace existing Bridge No. 74 on SR 1615 over Branch Upper Broad Creek (Morgan Swamp) in Craven County. The project involves replacement of the existing bridge structure with a 90-foot bridge at approximately the same location and roadway elevation of the existing structure using top-down construction. Permanent impacts will consist of 0.04-acre to surface waters, 0.12-acre of to wetlands adjacent to Morgan Swamp, and 8,842 ftz of riparian buffer. Traffic will be detoured off-site along surrounding roads, during construction. Impacts to Waters of the United States General Description: The project is located in the Neuse River Basin (Hydrologic Unit 03020102). A best usage classification of "C SW NSW" has been assigned to Morgan Swamp [DWQ Index # 03-04-10]. Neither High Quality Waters (HQW), Water Supplies (WS-I: undeveloped watersheds or WS-II: predominately undeveloped watersheds), listed Section 303(d) impairments, nor Outstanding Resource Waters (ORW) occur within 1.0 mile (1.6 km) of project study area. Morgan Swamp is not designated as a North Carolina Natural or Scenic River, or as a National Wild and Scenic River. Permanent Impacts: Morgan Swamp and its adjacent wetlands will be impacted by the proposed project. Construction of the proposed project will result in permanent impacts, including 0.08- acre of fill, 0.03-acre of mechanized clearing, and 0.04-acre of impacts to surface water (see permit drawings). MAILING ADDRESS: TELEPHONE: 919-733-3141 LOCATION: NC DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION FAX: 919-733-9794 TRANSPORTATION BUILDING PROJECT DEVELOPMENT AND ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS 'I SOUTH WILMINGTON STREET 1546 MAIL SERVICE CENTER WEBSITE: WWW.NCDOT.ORG RALEIGH NC RALEIGH NC 27699-1548 Temporary Impacts: Construction of the proposed project will result in 0.12-acre of temporary impacts to wetlands from hand-clearing activities (see permit drawings). Utility Impacts: No impacts to jurisdictional resources will occur due to relocation of utilities in the project area. Existing utility lines are in conflict with the proposed project; however, all utility work will be conducted in upland areas and existing road fill. The existing 6-inch PVC and ductile iron water line will be replaced by means of open-cut in the existing and proposed road fill and will not impact wetlands or buffer zones. All telephone and electrical lines will be replaced via directional drill method from upland to upland, and existing buried lines will be abandoned in place. Neuse River Basin Buffer Rules This project is located in the Neuse River Basin; therefore, the regulations pertaining to the buffer rules apply. There will be a total of 6,638 ftz of impacts to riparian buffers. This includes 2,499 ft2 (2,400 ft2 in Zone 1 and 99 ftZ in Zone 2) due to the bridge crossing. According to the buffer rules, bridges are allowable. Uses designated as allowable may proceed within the riparian buffer provided that there are no practical alternatives to the requested use pursuant to Item (8) of this Rule. In addition, 6,343 ftZ (4,440 ftZ in Zone 1 and 1,903 ftZ in Zone 2) of impacts will occur from approach fill and mechanized clearing activities. According to the buffer rules, road crossings greater than 150 feet, are allowable with mitigation. Uses designated as allowable with mitigation may proceed within the riparian buffer provided that there are no practical alternatives to the requested use pursuant to Item (8) of this Rule and an appropriate mitigation strategy has been approved pursuant to Item (10) of this Rule. All practicable measures to minimize impacts within buffer zones were followed. These uses require written authorization from the Division of Water Quality. Bridge Demolition The existing bridge is a four-span structure consisting of a concrete deck on timber joists with an asphalt-wearing surface. The substructure is composed of timber caps on timber piles. The bridge can be removed without dropping components into Waters of the United States during construction. Best Management Practices for Bridge Demolition and Removal will be followed to avoid any temporary fill from entering Waters of the United States. During project development, the NC Division of Marine Fisheries (DMF) recommended an in-water work moratorium for anadromous fish between February 15 and June 30. Federally Protected Species As of April 27, 2006 the US Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) has listed six federally protected species for Craven County (see Table 1). A biological conclusion of "no effect" remains valid for each species due to lack of suitable habitat. A biological conclusion is not required for the American alligator due to its designation of Threatened (due to similarity of appearance). No species have been added or deleted from the list since the completion of the CE (March 31, 2004). NCDOT T/P B-4088 Page 2 of 4 Table 1. Federally protected species of Craven Countv. Scientific Name Common Name Federal Status Survey Notes Biological Conclusion Alli ator mississi iensis American alli ator T(S/A) N/A N/A Haliaeetus leucoc•e halus• Bald ea le T(PFD) No Habitat No Effect Dermochel s coriacea Leatherback sea turtle E No Habitat No Effect Trichechus manatus West Indian Manatee E No Habitat No Effect Picoides borealis Red-cockaded wood ecker E No Habitat No Effect Aesch nomene virginica Sensitive 'oint-vetch T No Habitat No Effect (E) -Endangered T(S/A) - "Similarity of Appearance" (T) -Threatened T(PFD) - "Proposed for Delisting". Avoidance and Minimization Avoidance examines all appropriate and practicable possibilities of averting impacts to "Waters of the United States". Due to the presence of surface waters and wetlands within the project study area, avoidance of all impacts is not possible. The NCDOT is committed to incorporating all reasonable and practicable design features to avoid and minimize jurisdictional impacts. Minimization measures were incorporated as part of the project design these included: • Use of an off-site detour during construction. • Construction of a 21-foot longer bridge • The new structure will have only one bent in Morgan Swamp. • Best Management Practices will also be utilized during demolition of the existing bridge and construction of the new bridge. Mitigation The North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources Ecosystem Enhancement Program (EEP) will assume responsibility for satisfying the federal Clean Water Act compensatory mitigation requirements for the unavoidable impacts to 0.12-acre of wetlands and 3,787 ftz of riparian buffer. A copy of the EEP Acceptance Letter, dated August 28, 2006, is attached. Regulatory Approvals Section 404 Permit: All aspects of this project are being processed by the Federal Highway Administration as a "Categorical Exclusion" in accordance with 23 CFR 771.115(b). The NCDOT requests that these activities be authorized by a Nationwide Permit 23 (FR number 10, pages 2020-2095, January 15, 2002). Section 401 Certification: We anticipate 401 General Water Quality Certification number 3403 will apply to this project. All general conditions of the Water Quality Certifications will be met. Therefore, in accordance with 15A NCAC 2H, Section .0500(a) and 15A NCAC 2B.0200, we are providing copies of this application to the North Carolina Department of Environmental and Natural Resources, Division of Water Quality for their review. Neuse River Basin Buffer Authorization: NCDOT requests that the NC Division of Water Quality review this application and issue a written approval for a Neuse River Riparian Buffer Authorization. NCDOT T/P B-4088 Page 3 of 4 CAMA: According to attached email dated July 23, 2003 from NCDCM, the project site does not fall under NCDCM jurisdiction. A copy of this application will be posted on the NCDOT website at: http://www.doh.dot. state. nc.us/preconstruct/pe/neu/permit. html Thank you for your time and assistance with this project. Please contact Tyler Stanton at tstanton@dot.state.nc.us or (919) 715-1439 if you have any questions or need additional information. Sincerely, ~~ Gregory J. Thorpe, Ph.D. Environmental Management Director, PDEA Cc: W/attachment: Mr. John Hennessy, NCDWQ (5 Copies) Mr. Travis Wilson, NCWRC Mr. Gary Jordan, USFWS Mr. Ron Sechler, NMFS Mr. Michael Street, NCDMF Mr. Steve Sollod, NCDCM Ms. Tere Barrett, District Manager, NCDCM Dr. David Chang, P.E., Hydraulics Mr. Greg Perfetti, P.E., Structure Design Mr. Mark Staley, Roadside Environmental Mr. C. E. Lassiter, P.E., Division 2 Engineer Mr. Jay Johnson, Division 2 Environmental Officer W/o attachment Mr. Scott McLendon, USACE, Wilmington Mr. Jay Bennett, P.E., Roadway Design Mr. Majed Alghandour, P. E., Programming and TIP Mr. Art McMillan, P.E., Highway Design Ms. Beth Harmon, EEP Mr. Todd Jones, NCDOT External Audit Branch Mr. Bill Goodwin, P.E., PDEA NCDOT T/P B-4(188 Page 4 of 4 Office Use Only: Form Version March OS 9 USACE Action ID No. DWQ No. ~ ~ ~~ ~' ~u any pamcwar item ~s not applicable to this project, please enter "Not Applicable" or "N/A".) I. Processing 1. Check all of the approval(s) requested for this project: ® Section 404 Permit ® Riparian or Watershed Buffer Rules ^ Section 10 Permit ^ Isolated Wetland Permit from DWQ ® 401 Water Quality Certification ^ Express 401 Water Quality Certification 2. Nationwide, Regional or General Permit Number(s) Requested: NW 23 3. If this notification is solely a c urtesy copy because written approval for the 401 Certification is not required, check here: 4. If payment into the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program (NCEEP) is proposed for mitigation of impacts, attach the acceptance letter from NCEEP, complete section VIII, and check here: 5. If your project is located in any of North Carolina's twenty coastal counties (listed on page 4), and the project is within a North Carolina Division of Coastal Management Area of Environmental Concern (see the top of page 2 for further details), check here: II. Applicant Information 1. Owner/Applicant Information Name: _ Gregory J. Thorpe PhD Environmental Management Director Mailing Address: 1598 Mail Service Center Raleigh NC Telephone Number: (919) 733-3141 Fax Number: (919) 733-9794 E-mail Address: 2. Agent/Consultant Information (A signed and dated copy of the Agent Authorization letter must be attached if the Agent has signatory authority for the owner/applicant.) Name: Company Affiliation: Mailing Address: Telephone Number: E-mail Address: Fax Number: Page 1 of 9 III. Project Information Attach a vicinity map clearly showing the location of the property with respect to local landmarks such as towns, rivers, and roads. Also provide a detailed site plan showing property boundaries and development plans in relation to surrounding properties. Both the vicinity map and site plan must include a scale and north arrow. The specific footprints of all buildings, impervious surfaces, or other facilities must be included. If possible, the maps and plans should include the appropriate USGS Topographic Quad Map and NRCS Soil Survey with the property boundaries outlined. Plan drawings, or other maps may be included at the applicant's discretion, so long as the property is clearly defined. For administrative and distribution purposes, the USACE requires information to be submitted on sheets no larger than 11 by 17-inch format; however, DWQ may accept paperwork of any size. DWQ prefers full-size construction drawings rather than a sequential sheet version of the full-size plans. If full-size plans are reduced to a small scale such that the final version is illegible, the applicant will be informed that the project has been placed on hold until decipherable maps are provided. Name of project: 2. T.I.P. Project Number or State Project Number (NCDOT Only): B-4088 3. Property Identification Number (Tax PIN): N/A 4. Location County: Craven Nearest Town: New Bern Subdivision name (include phase/lot number): N/A Directions to site (include road numbers/names, landmarks, etc.): 5. Site coordinates (For linear projects, such as a road or utility line, attach a sheet that separately lists the coordinates for each crossing of a distinct waterbody.) Decimal Degrees (6 digits minimum): -77.0025 °N 35.1772 °W 6. Property size (acres): N/A 7. Name of nearest receiving body of water: Moran Swamp 8. River Basin: Neuse (Note -this must be one of North Carolina's seventeen designated major river basins. The River Basin map is available at http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/admin/mansl.) 9. Describe the existing conditions on the site and general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this application: Rural with forested areas and scattered residential and farms. Page 2 of 9 10. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used: Replacement of the existing bridge structure with a 90-foot bridge at approximately the same location and roadway elevation of the existing_structure using top-down construction. 11. Explain the purpose of the proposed work:__ The bridge is considered to be structurally deficient and functionally obsolete and the replacement will result in safer traffic operations IV. Prior Project History If jurisdictional determinations and/or permits have been requested and/or obtained for this project (including all prior phases of the same subdivision) in the past, please explain. Include the USACE Action ID Number, DWQ Project Number, application date, and date permits and certifications were issued or withdrawn. Provide photocopies of previously issued permits, certifications or other useful information. Describe previously approved wetland, stream and buffer impacts, along with associated mitigation (where applicable). If this is a NCDOT project, list and describe permits issued for prior segments of the same T.I.P. project, along with construction schedules. N/A V. Future Project Plans Are any future permit requests anticipated for this project? If so, describe the anticipated work, and provide justification for the exclusion of this work from the current application. VI. Proposed Impacts to Waters of the United States/Waters of the State It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to wetlands, open water, and stream channels associated with the project. Each impact must be listed separately in the tables below (e.g., culvert installation should be listed separately from. riprap dissipater pads). Be sure to indicate if an impact is temporary. All proposed impacts, permanent and temporary, must be listed, and must be labeled and clearly identifiable on an accompanying site plan. All wetlands and waters, and all streams (intermittent and perennial) should be shown on a delineation map, whether or not impacts are proposed to these systems. Wetland and stream evaluation and delineation forms should be included as appropriate. Photographs may be included at the applicant's discretion. If this proposed impact is strictly for wetland or stream mitigation, list and describe the impact in Section VIII below. If additional space is needed for listing or description, please attach a separate sheet. Page 3 of 9 1. Provide a written description of the proposed impacts: approach fill, hand clearing, mechanized clearing 2. Individually list wetland impacts. Types of impacts include, but are not limited to mechanized clearing, grading, fill, excavation, flooding, ditching/drainage, etc. For dams, separately list impacts due to hcth ctn~ctnrP and flnnrlinu Wetland Im act P Site Number (indicate on map) Type of Impact T ype of Wetland (e.g., forested, marsh, herbaceous, bog, etc.) Located within 100-year Floodplain ( es/no) Distance to Nearest Stream (linear feet) Area of Impact (acres) 17+62 to 24+35-L- Permanent Fill Forested/Riverine Yes 0.08 17+62 to 24+35-L- Mechanized Clearing Forested/Riverine Yes 0.03 17+62 to 24+35-L- Hand Clearing Forested/Riverine Yes 0.12 Total Wetland Impact (acres) 0.23 3. List the total acreage (estimated) of all existing wetlands on the property: N/A 4. Individually list all intermittent and perennial stream impacts. Be sure to identify temporary impacts. Stream impacts include, but are not limited to placement of fill or culverts, dam construction, flooding, relocation, stabilization activities (e.g., cement walls, rip-rap, crib walls, gabions, etc.), excavation, ditching/straightening, etc. If stream relocation is proposed, plans and profiles showing the linear footprint for both the original and relocated streams must be included. To calculate acreage, multiply length X width, then divide by 43,560. Stream Impact Number (indicate on map) Stream Name Type of Impact Perennial or Intermittent? Average Stream Width Before Im act Impact Len th g (linear feet) Area of Im act p ) (acres N/A Total Stream Impact (by length and acreage) 0 0 Page 4 of 9 5. Individually list all open water impacts (including lakes, ponds, estuaries, sounds, Atlantic Ocean and any other water of the U.S.). Open water impacts include, but are not limited to fill, excavation, dredging, flooding, drainage, bulkheads, etc. Open Water Impact Site Number indicate on ma (~ p) Name of Waterbody (if applicable) Type of Impact Type of Waterbody (lake, pond, estuary, sound, bay, ocean, etc.) Area of Impact ) (acres 17+62 to 24+35-L- Morgans Swamp Fill Impounded Creek 0.04 17+62 to 24+35-L- Morgans Swamp Bent Creek 0.00 Total Open Water Impact (acres) 0.04 6. List the cumulative impact to all Waters of the U.S. resulting from the project: Stream Impact (acres): 0.0 Wetland Impact (acres): 0.23 Open Water Impact (acres): 0.04 Total Impact to Waters of the U.S. (acres) 0.27 Total Stream Impact (linear feet): 0 7. Isolated Waters Do any isolated waters exist on the property? ^ Yes ®No Describe all impacts to isolated waters, and include the type of water (wetland or stream) and the size of the proposed impact (acres or linear feet). Please note that this section only applies to waters that have specifically been determined to be isolated by the USACE. N/A 8. Pond Creation If construction of a pond is proposed, associated wetland and stream impacts should be included above in the wetland and stream impact sections. Also, the proposed pond should be described here and illustrated on any maps included with this application. Pond to be created in (check all that apply): ^ uplands ^ stream ^ wetlands Describe the method of construction (e.g., dam/embankment, excavation, installation of draw-down valve or spillway, etc.): N/A Proposed use or purpose of pond (e.g., livestock watering, irrigation, aesthetic, trout pond, local stormwater requirement, etc.): Current land use in the vicinity of the pond: Size of watershed draining to pond: Expected pond surface area: VII. Impact Justification (Avoidance and Minimization) Specifically describe measures taken to avoid the proposed impacts. It may be useful to provide information related to site constraints such as topography, building ordinances, accessibility, and financial viability of the project. The applicant may attach drawings of alternative, lower-impact site layouts, and explain why these design options were not feasible. Also discuss how impacts were minimized once the desired site plan was developed. If applicable, discuss construction Page 5 of 9 techniques to be followed during construction to reduce impacts. Use of an off-site detour during construction, construction of a 21-foot lon er single-span bridge Best Management Practices will also be utilized during demolition of the existing bridge and construction of the new bridue. VIII. Mitigation DWQ - In accordance with 15A NCAC 2H .0500, mitigation. may be required by the NC Division of Water Quality for projects involving greater than or equal to one acre of impacts to freshwater wetlands or greater than or equal to 150 linear feet of total impacts to perennial streams. USACE - In accordance with the Final Notice of Issuance and Modification of Nationwide Permits, published in the Federal Register on January 15, 2002, mitigation will be required when necessary to ensure that adverse effects to the aquatic environment are minimal. Factors including size and type of proposed impact and function and relative value of the impacted aquatic resource will be considered in determining acceptability of appropriate and practicable mitigation as proposed. Examples of mitigation that may be appropriate and practicable include, but are not limited to: reducing the size of the project; establishing and maintaining wetland and/or upland vegetated buffers to protect open waters such as streams; and replacing losses of aquatic resource functions and values by creating, restoring, enhancing, or preserving similar functions and values, preferable in the same watershed. If mitigation is required for this project, a copy of the mitigation plan must be attached in order for USACE or DWQ to consider the application complete for processing. Any application lacking a required mitigation plan or NCEEP concurrence shall be placed on hold as incomplete. An applicant may also choose to review the current guidelines for stream restoration in DWQ's Draft Technical Guide for Stream Work in North Carolina, available at http://h2o. enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands/strm~;ide.html. 1. Provide a brief description of the proposed mitigation plan. The description should provide as much information as possible, including, but not limited to: site location (attach directions and/or map, if offsite), affected stream and river basin, type and amount (acreage/linear feet) of mitigation proposed (restoration, enhancement, creation, or preservation), a plan view, preservation mechanism (e.g., deed restrictions, conservation easement, etc.), and a description of the current site conditions and proposed method of construction. Please attach a separate sheet if more space is needed. The NCEEP will provide compensatory mitigation for impacts from this project 2. Mitigation may also be made by payment into the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program (NCEEP). Please note it is the applicant's responsibility to contact the NCEEP at (919) 715-0476 to determine availability, and written approval from the NCEEP indicating that they are will to accept payment for the mitigation must be attached to this form. For Page 6 of 9 additional information regarding the application process for the NCEEP, check the NCEEP website at http://h2aenr.state.nc.us/wrp/index.htm. If use of the NCEEP is proposed, please check the appropriate box on page five and provide the following information: Amount of stream mitigation requested (linear feet): 0 Amount of buffer mitigation requested (square feet): 3,787 Amount of Riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres): 0.12 Amount ofNon-riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres): 00 Amount of Coastal wetland mitigation requested (acres): 0 IX. Environmental Documentation (required by DWQ) Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the use of public (federal/state) land? Yes ® No ^ 2. If yes, does the project require preparation of an environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or North Carolina Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)? Note: If you are not sure whether a NEPA/SEPA document is required, call the SEPA coordinator at (919) 733-5083 to review current thresholds for environmental documentation. Yes ® No ^ 3. If yes, has the document review been finalized by the State Clearinghouse? If so, please attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval letter. Yes ® No ^ X. Proposed Impacts on Riparian and Watershed Buffers (required by DWQ) It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to required state and local buffers associated with the project. The applicant must also provide justification for these impacts in Section VII above. All proposed impacts must be listed herein, and must be clearly identifiable on the accompanying site plan. All buffers must be shown on a map, whether or not impacts are proposed to the buffers. Correspondence from the DWQ Regional Office may be included as appropriate. Photographs may also be included at the applicant's discretion. 1. Will the project impact protected riparian buffers identified within 15A NCAC 2B .0233 (Neuse), 15A NCAC 2B .0259 (Tar-Pamlico), 15A NCAC 02B .0243 (Catawba) 15A NCAC 2B .0250 (Randleman Rules and Water Supply Buffer Requirements), or other (please identify Neuse )? Yes ® No ^ 2. If "yes", identify the square feet and acreage of impact to each zone of the riparian buffers. If buffer mitigation is required calculate the required amount of mitigation by applying the buffer multipliers. Page 7 of 9 Zone* Impact (s uare feet) Multiplier Required Miti ation 1 6840 3 (2 for Catawba) 7011 2 2002 1.5 2175 Total 8842 9186** * Zone 1 extends out 30 feet perpendicular from the top of the near bank of channel; Zone 2 extends an additional 20 feet from the edge of Zone 1. ** Total offset by compensatory wetland mitigation 3. If buffer mitigation is required, please discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (i.e., Donation of Property, Riparian Buffer Restoration /Enhancement, or Payment into the Riparian Buffer Restoration Fund). Please attach all appropriate information as identified within 15A NCAC 2B .0242 or .0244, or .0260. The NCEEP will provide compensatory mitigation for buffer impacts from this proiect XI. Stormwater (required by DWQ) Describe impervious acreage (existing and proposed) versus total acreage on the site. Discuss stormwater controls proposed in order to protect surface waters and wetlands downstream from the property. If percent impervious surface exceeds 20%, please provide calculations demonstrating total proposed impervious level. See Stormwater Management Plan XII. Sewage Disposal (required by DWQ) Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility. N/A XIII. Violations (required by DWQ) Is this site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500) or any Buffer Rules? Yes ^ No Is this an after-the-fact permit application? Yes ^ No XIV. Cumulative Impacts (required by DWQ) Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality? Yes ^ No If yes, please submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the most recent North Carolina Division of Water Quality policy posted on our website at http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands. If no, please provide a short narrative description: Page 8 of 9 XV. Other Circumstances (Optional): It is the applicant's responsibility to submit the application sufficiently in advance of desired construction dates to allow processing time for these permits. However, an applicant may choose to list constraints associated with construction or sequencing that may impose limits on work schedules (e.g., draw-down schedules for lakes, dates associated with Endangered and Threatened Species, accessibility problems, or other issues outside of the applicant's control). Applicant/Agent's Signature Date (Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant is provided.) Page 9 of 9 CATEGORICAL, EXCLUSION ACTION CLASSIFICATION FORM TIP Project No. State Project No. W.B.S. No. Federal Project No. B-4088 8.2171301__ 33446.1.1 BRSTP-1615(2) A. Project Description: The purpose of this project is to replace Craven County Bridge No. 74 on SR 1615 over Upper Broad Creek. The replacement structure will be a bridge 75 feet long and 40 feet wide. The cross section will include two 12- foot lanes and 8-foot offsets. The south approach will be approximately 345 feet and north approach will be approximately 364 feet long. The approach cross section will include two 12-foot lanes and 8-foot shoulders. Traffic will be detoured offsite during construction (see Figure 1). The roadway will be designed as a Rural Major Collector with a 60 mile per hour design speed. B. Purpose and Need: Bridge Maintenance Records indicate the bridge has a sufficiency rating of 47.2 out of 100. The bridge's four- span superstructure is composed of a concrete deck on timber joists. The substructure is composed of timber caps on timber piles. The bridge's timber substructure including a timber abutment is deteriorating (currently rated 4 out of 10) qualifying the bridge as structurally deficient and therefore eligible for FHWA's Highway Bridge Replacement Program. C. Proposed Improvements: Circle one or more of the following Type II improvements that apply to the project: 1. Modernization of a highway by resurfacing, restoration, rehabilitation, reconstruction, adding shoulders, or adding auxiliary lanes (e.g., parking, weaving, turning, climbing). a. Restoring, Resurfacing, Rehabilitating, and Reconstructing pavement (3R and 4R improvements) b. Widening roadway and shoulders without adding through lanes c. Modernizing gore treatments d. Constructing lane improvements (merge, auxiliary, and turn lanes) e. Adding shoulder drains f. Replacing and rehabilitating culverts, inlets, and drainage pipes, including safety treatments g. Providing driveway pipes h. Performing minor bridge widening (less than one through lane) i. Slide Stabilization j. Structural BMP's for water quality improvement 2. Highway safety or traffic operations improvement projects including the installation of ramp metering control devices and lighting. a. Installing ramp metering devices b. Installing lights c. Adding or upgrading guazdrail d. Installing safety barriers including Jersey type barriers and pier protection e. Installing or replacing impact attenuators f. Upgrading medians including adding or upgrading median barriers g. Improving intersections including relocation and/or realignment h. Making minor roadway realignment i. Channelizing traffic j. Performing clear zone safety improvements including removing hazazds and flattening slopes k. Implementing traffic aid systems, signals, and motorist aid 1. Installing bridge safety hardware including bridge rail retrofit 3. Bridge rehabilitation, reconstruction, or replacement or the construction of grade sepazation to replace existing at-grade railroad crossings. a. Rehabilitating, reconstructing, or replacing bridge approach slabs b. Rehabilitating or replacing bridge decks c. Rehabilitating bridges including painting (no red lead paint), scour repair, fender systems, and minor structural improvements . O Replacing a bridge (structure and/or fill) 4. Transportation corridor fringe parking facilities. 5. Construction of new truck weigh stations or rest areas. 6. Approvals for disposal of excess right-of--way or for joint or limited use of right-of--way, where the proposed use does not have significant adverse impacts. 7. Approvals for changes in access control. 8. Construction of new bus storage and maintenance facilities in areas used predominantly for industrial or transportation purposes where such construction is not inconsistent with existing zoning and located on or near a street with adequate capacity to handle anticipated bus and support vehicle traffic. 9. Rehabilitation or reconstruction of existing rail and bus buildings and ancillary facilities where only minor amounts of additional land are required and there is not a substantial increase in the number of users. 10. Construction of bus transfer facilities (an open area consisting of passenger shelters, boarding areas, kiosks and related street improvements) when located in a commercial area or other high activity center in which there is adequate street capacity for projected bus traffic. 11. Construction of rail storage and maintenance facilities in azeas used predominantly for industrial or transportation purposes where such construction is not inconsistent with existing zoning and where there is no significant noise impact on the surrounding community. 2 12. Acquisition of land for hardship or protective purposes, advance land acquisition loans under section 3(b) of the UMT Act. Hardship and protective buying will be permitted only for a particular parcel or a limited number of parcels. These types of land acquisition qualify for a CE only where the acquisition will not limit the evaluation of alternatives, including shifts in alignment for planned construction projects, which may be required in the NEPA process. No project development on such land may proceed until the NEPA process has been completed. 13. Acquisition and construction of wetland, stream and endangered species mitigation sites. 14. Remedial activities involving the removal, treatment or monitoring of soil or groundwater contamination pursuant to state or federal remediation guidelines. D. S ecial Pro'ect Information: (Include Environmental Commitments and Permits Require .) Estimated Costs: Total Construction $ 675,000 Right of Way $ 50,000 Total $ 715,000 Estimated Traffic: Current - 1500 vpd Year 2025 - 2600 vpd TTST - 1% Dual - 2% Design Exceptions: There are no design exceptions anticipated for this project. Functional Classification: Rural Major Collector Bridge Demolition: There will be no appreciable fill associated with debris from demolition of the bridge. Alternatives Discussion: An offsite detour will be utilized during construction including SR 1620, SR 1617, and back to SR 1615. The average road user would follow a detour requiring 1.3 miles additional travel resulting in a delay of approximately 2.5 minutes. Division 2 and the School Bus Transportation Director for Craven County have no objection to an offsite detour at this location. Craven County EMS has firmly requested that the time of construction be kept to an absolute minimum. E. Threshold Criteria The following evaluation of threshold criteria must be completed for Type II actions ECOLOGICAL YES NO (1) Will the project have a substantial impact on any unique or important natural resource? X (2) Does the project involve habitat where federally listed endangered or threatened species may occur? ^ X (3) Will the project affect anadromous fish? ^ X (4) If the project involves wetlands, is the amount of permanent and/or temporary wetland taking less than one-tenth (1 / 10) of an acre and have .all practicable measures to avoid and minimize wetland takings been evaluated? X ^ (5) Will the project require the use of U. S. Forest Service lands? ^ X (6) Will the quality of adjacent water resources be adversely impacted by proposed construction activities? ^ X (7) Does the project involve waters classified as Outstanding Water Resources (OWR) and/or High Quality Waters (HQW)? ^ X (8) Will the project require fill in waters of the United States in any of the designated mountain trout counties? ~ X (9) Does the project involve any known underground storage tanks (UST's) or hazardous materials sites? ^ X PERMITS AND COORDINATION YES NO (10) ~ If the project is located within a CAMA county, will the project significantly affect the coastal zone and/or any "Area of Environmental Concern" (AEC)? X (11) Does the project involve Coastal Barrier Resources Act resources? X (12) Will a U. S. Coast Guard permit be required? a X (13) Will the project result in the modification of any existing regulatory floodway? X 4 (14) Will the project require any stream relocations or channel changes? X SOCIAL, ECONOMIC, AND CULTURAL RESOURCES YES NO (15) Will the project induce substantial impacts to planned growth or land use for the area? ^ X (16) Will the project require the relocation of any family or business? X (17) Will the project have a disproportionately high and adverse human health and environmental effect on any minority or low-income population? ^ X (18) If the project involves the acquisition of right of way, is the amount of right of way acquisition considered minor? X (19) Will the project involve any changes in access control? ^ X (20) Will the project substantially alter the usefulness and/or land use of adjacent property? ^ X (21) Will the project have an adverse effect on permanent local traffic patterns or community cohesiveness? X (22) Is the project included in an approved thoroughfare plan and/or Transportation Improvement Program (and is, therefore, in conformance with the Clean Air Act of 1990)? X (23) Is the project anticipated to cause an increase in traffic volumes? X (24) Will traffic be maintained during construction using existing roads, staged construction, or on-site detours? ^ X (25) If the project is a bridge replacement project, will the bridge be replaced at its existing location (along the existing facility) and will all construction proposed in association with the bridge replacement project be contained on the existing facility? ^ X (26) Is there substantial controversy on social, economic, or environmental grounds concerning the project? X (27) Is the project consistent with all Federal, State, and local laws ^ ' relating to the environmental aspects of the project? X (28) Will the project have an "effect" on structures/properties eligible for or listed on the National Register of Historic Places? X 5 (29) Will the project affect any archaeological remains which are important to history orpre-history? X (30) Will the project require the use of Section 4(f) resources (public parks, recreation lands, wildlife and waterfowl refuges, historic sites, or historic bridges, as defined in Section 4(f) of the U. S. Department of Transportation Act of 1966)? X (31) Will'the project result in any conversion of assisted public recreation sites or facilities to non-recreation uses, as defined by Section 6(f) of the Land and Water Conservation Act of 1965, as amended? X (32) Will the project involve construction in, across, or adjacent to a river designated as a component of or proposed for inclusion in the National System of Wild and Scenic Rivers? X F. Additional Documentation Required for Unfavorable Responses in Part E Question 3. Will the project affect anadromous fish? The stream is habitat for anadramous fish. Impact from the project will be minimized by the use of the measures included below which are repeated in the Project Commitments Green Sheet of this document. • NCDOT will implement Stream Crossing Guidelines for Anadramous Fish • The North Carolina Division of Marine Fisheries has indicated that a moratorium on in-water construction will be in place from February 1 to September 30 of any given year. • To the extent practical, construction should be accomplished without the use of construction pads. • To the extent practical, bridge demolition should occur without getting into the water. 6 G. CE Approval TIP Project No. B-4088 State Project No. 8.2171301 W.B.S. No. 33446.1.1 Federal Project No. BRSTP-1615(2) Project Description: The purpose of this project is to replace Craven County Bridge No. 74 on SR 1615 over Upper Broad Creek. The replacement structure will be a bridge 85 feet long and 40 feet wide. The cross section will include two 12- foot lanes and 8-foot offsets. The south approach will be approximately 345 feet and north approach will be approximately 364 feet long. The approach cross section wilt include two 12-foot lanes and 8-foot shoulders. Traffic will be detoured offsite during construction (see Figure 1). The roadway will be designed as a Rural Major Collector with a 60 mile per hour design speed. Categorical Exclusion Action Classification: (Check one) TYPE II(A) X TYPE II(B) Approved: Date .~ 3.-- Date Proiec ect Development & Environmental Analysis Branch - (, ! i~~ Date Project lamm~g ngineer Project Development & Environmental Analysis Branch For Type II(B) projects only: Date J F. Sullivan, III, Division Adnu Federal Highway Administration Assistant Manager Project Development & Environmental Analysis Branch PROJECT COMMITMENTS: Craven County Bridge No. 74 on SR 1615 Oven-Branch of Upper Broad Creek Federal Aid Project No. BRSTP-1615(2) State Project No. 8.2171301 W.B.S. No. 33446.1.1 T.I.P. No. B-4088 All Pre-Construction Units/ Resident Engineer -EMS Concerns Craven County EMS has indicated that SR 1615 is a critical route. Road closure is tolerable but its duration should be kept to a minimum. All aspects of design and construction should facilitate the shortest reasonable duration of road closure. Resident Engineer -EMS Notification Craven County EMS must be provided a minimum 2 weeks notice prior to road closure. All Pre-Construction Units/ Resident Engineer - Anadramous Fish The North Carolina Division of Marine Fisheries has indicated that a moratorium on in-water construction will be in place from February 15 to June 30 of any given year. Strong consideration should be given to spanning the stream completely. To the extent practical, construction should be accomplished without getting into the water. To the extent practical, bridge demolition should occur without getting into the water. Hydraulics - Anadramous Fish NCDOT will implement Stream Crossing Guidelines for Anadramous Fish Resident Engineer -School Bus Turnaround Prior to the Construction Letting, the Division will coordinate with school bus officials to establish a turnaround for busses during the period of construction. Office of Natural Environment -Bridge Demolition -104 Permit It should be possible to remove all portions of the bridge without any resulting debris/fill in the stream. Categorical Exclusion Page 1 of 1 Green Sheet March 2004 23{ ~ ~ r~ + ~~ ~ POCOS IN _•__ ° _ 6~0 `• 22 +. ~'" 16~ •, Studied Offsite Detour ,. : `. w.. +~ ` 205 ,• i= ~ '` i ~ ' ,, i • •Q1..8 t1'~"" '~ 126 . ..: ~i ~~ ~~ / ~ / .~ ~. 27 `.. ~ ~a ~5; ~ ~ '~ i / ~ ! ~ ~~ 1 „/ ~ . ~ Ser~q ' t~\ 126; ~ i "°°'+ "}' ~\ _ I `' ~ .` O 44 I ~'.., ~~ '. i• P64 ~ •, ~., '~ 74 ~ 209 ~, ,~ • ~`'' ~ •.;: ~~ ~. •• ~ ''. i .: ~. .•: ..I 13 ~ 207 'i ~ .. •.~'.~' ~~ j, 65 ~ , ., _ ..: ,_._ ~4 ~. ~~ .ti..m o ..~ ._..; - .~ , ~~ ~'~ / i ~ 1 .may o ~ i ~ ` ,'~ ,. I J ~i~ ( ~ hiY ~y .. ` Q i 0 ~ ~ _ i ~ r ~~• r ~ •~ w.r. ~ 71 / ~° ~ . ~o '~ ~EVS F ~ ~ . / • ~0 / ~ yrr~ ~` ~ f '~ ~~ •' NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF /E ~ ~ TRANSPORTATION ~' '~; DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS ~'± ,~' PROJECT DEVELOPMENT & '~~ / , M1~~ , ` ' ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS BRANCH CRAVEN COUNTY REPLACE BRIDGE NO. 74 ON SR 1615 OVER BRANCH UPPER BROAD CREEK 8-4088 Figure 1 s~ RFc ~ ~ ~ ~i i ,~ =n 'L~ G i ~ `~ G ~,z,~; rn t- :~ r~ p O North Carolina Department of Cultural State Historic Preservation Ot~ice David L. S. Brook. ?-dministrator Michael F. Easley, Governor Lisbeth C~ Evans, Secretary Je&ey J. Clow, Deputy Secretary Ol3ice of :lrchsves and History October 28, 2003 MEMORANDUM _ .~~~~, ~:.:rte L n_~%: ,~ Resource~,~~~,,~ ~*~.~~„~~yl' tl~~ ~`~:_'_ ~~ ~ ~.~~' Cyr Division of Historical Resources TO: Greg Thorpe, Ph.D., Director Project Development and Environmental Analysis Branch NCDOT Division of Highways FROM: David Brook a I ~~i SUBJECT: Replacement of-Bridge No. 74 on SR 1615 over Br. Upper Broad Creek, B-4088, Craven County, ER03-0929 On September 4, 2003, Sarah McBride, our preservation spetdaiist for transportation projects met with the North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT) staff for a meeting of the minds concerning the above project. We reported on our available information on historic architectural and archaeological surveys and resources along with our recommendations. DOT provided project area photographs and aerial photographs at the meeting. Based on our review of the photographs and the information discussed at the meeting, we offer our preliminary comments regarding this project. In terms of historic azchitectural resources, we aze aware of no historic structures located within the areas of potential effect. We recommend that no historic architectural survey be conducted for this project. There are no recorded azchaeological sites within the proposed project azea. Based on our present knowledge of the azea, it is unlikely that any archaeological resources which may be eligible for listing in the National Register of Historic Places will be affected by the project construction. We, therefore, recommend that no archaeological investigation be conducted in connection with this project. Having provided this information, we look forward to receipt of either a Categorical Exclusion or Environmental Assessment which indicates how NCDOT addressed our comments. www. h ao. d c r.s to te. v c. u~ Location Mailing :\ddress TelephondFr+x< ADMINISTRATION 507 N. t3lount St., Raleigh NC 4617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh NC 17699-.1617 19191733-1763 •733-865 RESTOR,\'TION 515 N. Blount St., Raleigh NC 4617 `tail Service Ccntcr, Raleigh NC 17699-1617 1919) 733-6567 •715-48C 5l'RVEY & PLANNING i15 N. Bluunt St., Raleigh NC 4617 ~1ail Service Center, Raleigh NC 2;699-1617 1919) 73~-6545 •715''8( October 28, ?003 Page 2 The above comments are made pursuant to Section lOG of the National Historic Preservation Act and the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation's Regulations for Compliance with Section 106 codified at 36 CFR Part 800. Thank you for your cooperation and consideration. If you have questions concerning the above comment, contact Renee Gledhill-Earley, environmental review coordinator, at 919/733-4763. In all future communication concerning this project, please cite the above referenced tracking number. ~ w Irk lip L~; _7' MEMORANDUM TO: William T. Goodwin, Jr., PE NCDOT Bridge Replacement Planning Unit FROM: Mike Street DATE: July 8, 2003 SUBJECT: Bridge Replacement for: # 8-4168, # B-4088, # B-4085 Preston P. Pate, Jr., Director Attached is the Divisions' reply for the above referenced project. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me. MS/sw :>~ -. , ,. -- .. '.._...,',retaa~ C,t'~ qtr>r,n Carolina 26557 ~r..:,r _ _-- . _ . -- - _ .--_ ~ _-'•. Interne: :~^d-rf nit ~~~ ^~~ ~~~ ~~~ NCDENR _.::~ ~ rr.~ ~ ~t :~f r:r ~, ironment and Natural Resources _ .~i~i; . ~. P.':~~:n :Fisheries ~r =,,:~i ~p~ ; _,: - - _ - `~~ic P.c/c'~:; ~.'~~'~ Post Consumer Paper Memo To: Mike Street From: Mike Marshall Date: 06/27/03 Re: Review of bridge replacement projects The three bridge replacement projects in the Central District should be classified as yellow light projects due to anadromous fish spawning concerns. Bachelor Creek 6- 4085, and Upper Broad Creek 8-4088 are river herring spawning areas and Mussel Shell Creek 8-4168 is adjacent to river herring spawning activity in the Trent River and neighboring creeks indicating it may also have spawning activity. An in-stream construction moratorium from Feb.15 to June 30 should be implemented for these projects. Best management practices and restoration measures should be undertaken to minimize impacts to wetland habitats in these areas. • Page 1 Natural Systems Technical Report Replacement of Bridge No. 74 on SR 1615 Over Branch Upper Broad Creek Craven County, North Carolina State Project No. 8.2171301 TIP Project No. B-4088 North Carolina Department of Transportation Project Development and Environmental Analysis Branch March 2003 Natural Systems Report for B-4088, Craven County Executive Summary Executive Summary The following is a Natural Systems Technical Report for the proposed replacement of Bridge No. 74 on Saints Delight Church Road (SR1615) over Morgan Swamp (Branch - Upper Broad Creek) in Craven County, North Carolina (TIP No. B-4088). Introduction The proposed project will replace Bridge No. 74 on Saints Delight Church Road over Morgan Swamp in Craven County, North Carolina. The project study azea is primarily disturbed urban and agricultural lands and forested land. The project study area is located in the Coastal Plain physiographic region, approximately 19 to 25 feet (5.8 to 7.6 meters) above mean sea level (msl). Two hydric soil mapping units aze depicted within the project study azea -undivided Masontown mucky fine sandy loam and Muckalee sandy loam, and Rains fine sandy loam. Physical Characteristics Water Resources Water resources located within the project study area lie in North Carolina Division of Water Quality (NCDWQ) Subbasin 03-04-10 and the United States Geological Survey (USGS) Subbasin 03020202 of the Neuse River Drainage Basin. The best usage classification of Morgan Swamp (NCDWQ Stream Index #27-106-3-1) is Class C, Sw, NSW (NCDEM 2002). No water resources classified as High Quality Waters, Water Supplies, Outstanding Resource Waters, or listed Section 303(d) impairments aze located within the project study area. Biotic Resources The following three plant communities were found within the project study area: Coastal Plain small stream swamp, Coastal Plain mixed pine/hardwood forest, and agriculturaUdisturbed lands. The table that follows shows the acreage of the plant communities within the project study area. Natural Systems Report for B-4088, Craven County Executive Summary List of Plant Communities Community Area Coastal Plain Small Stream Swamp 7.3 acres (3.0 ha) Coastal Plain Mixed Pine/Hardwood Forest 1.8 acres (0.7 ha) Urban/Agricultural Disturbed lands 32.6 acres (13.2 ha) Jurisdictional Topics Surface Waters and Wetlands Morgan Swamp is considered jurisdictional surface waters under Section 404 of the Clean Water Act. Based upon the results of the field investigation, the project study area also contains jurisdictional wetlands. The total amount of jurisdictional wetlands within the project area is 7.3 acres (3.0 hectares). The NCDWQ rating for the wetland area is 74. Since no alternatives have been selected, impacts to these "Waters of the United States" cannot be determined. Due to the potential for water quality impacts during construction, in-stream construction moratoriums to limit the effects on fishery resources have been suggested. The moratorium applies if the following species are supported by the stream: sturgeon (February 1 to June 30), brown and brook trout (October 15 to April 15), rainbow trout (January 1 to Apri115), spotfin chub (May 15 to August 15), smallmouth bass (May 1 to July 15), eastern sunfish (April l to June 30), western sunfish (May 1 to June 30), and other anadromous fish (February 15 to June 30). A 25 foot (7.6 meter) buffer moratorium exists relative to the smallmouth bass. Qualified biologists from the NCDOT will assess the stream for the abovementioned species. Once the fish have been identified as being supported by the stream, the appropriate moratorium will be applied. Essential fish habitat (EFI~ is defined as "those waters and substrate necessary to fish for spawning, breeding, feeding, or growth to maturity." The aforementioned waters include aquatic areas and their associated physical, chemical, and biological properties used by fish and include aquatic areas historically used by fish where appropriate. The aforementioned substrate includes sediment, hard bottom, structures underlying the waters, and associated biological communities. The proposed project is not anticipated to involve EFH. 2 Natural Systems Report for B-4088, Craven County Executive Summary Permits A Nationwide Permit #23 (Approved Categorical Exclusions) should cover the impacts to jurisdictional streams in the project study azea. A Nationwide Permit #33 (Temporary Construction, Access, and Dewatering) maybe needed for temporary construction access if that is not addressed in the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) document. A final permitting strategy cannot be developed until a design alternative is selected. A Section 401 General Water Quality Certification is also required for any activity that may result in a dischazge into "Waters of the United States" or for which an issuance of a federal permit or license is issued. Certifications are administered through the NCDWQ. Final determination of permit applicability lies with the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USAGE). A Coastal Area Management Act (CAMA) permit is required for any development within Areas of Environmental Concern (AEC): Craven County is one of the 20 _ _ CAMA counties in North Carolina. The AECs include navigable waters, marshes and wetlands, azeas within 75 feet of mean high water line along an estuarine shoreline, the ocean beach, inlets, azeas designated as inland fishing water by the N.C. Marine Fisheries Commission (NCMFC), and azeas neaz a public water supply. A Major Permit is required if there is any dredging or filling of water or marsh, or if another state or federal permit is required. Section 103(5)(b) of the CAMA exempts road maintenance within a public right-of--way. The North Cazolina Division of Coastal Management (NCDCM) administers LAMA permits within the state. The NCDCM will review the desiga plans and determine the permit requirements for the project. Permit requirements cannot be determined until a design alternative is selected. Federally Protected Species Plants and animals with federal classifications of Endangered, Threatened, Proposed Endangered, and Proposed Threatened are protected under provisions of Section 7 and Section 9 of the Endangered Species Act. As of February 11, 2003, the United States Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) identified three endangered species, two threatened species, and one threatened species due to similarity of appearance as potentially occurring in Craven County. The table that follows lists each species, its status and biological conclusion. Common Name Scientific Name Federal Biological Status Conclusion American alligator - Bald Eagle Leatherback sea turtle West Indian Manatee A /l ig s t o r m ississip p i e n s is Ha/iaeetus /eucocepha/us Dermochelys coriacea Trichechus manatus Red-cockaded woodpecker Picoides borealis Sensitive jointvetch Aeschynomene uirginica American Alligator Threatened (S/A) Threatened Endangered Endangered Endangered Threatened No Effect No Effect No Effect No Effect No Effect No Effect Suitable habitat for the American alligator does exist within the project area in Morgan Swamp. A review of the North Carolina Natural Heritage Program (NCNHP) database of rare species and unique habitats on December 11, 2002 has no record for the presence of the American alligator within the project vicinity. A survey for the American alligator was conducted within the project area; however, no individuals or their nests were observed. Bald Eagle Biological Conclusion: No Effect Suitable habitat for the bald eagle (i.e., lazge bodies of water) does not exist within the project study area. In addition, a large amount of human disturbance has occurred within and azound the project study area. Review of NCNHP maps indicated no lmown populations of this species within 1 mile of the project study area. No impacts to this species from project construction aze anticipated. Leatherback Sea Turtle Biological Conclusion: No Effect Suitable habitat for the leatherback sea turtle (i.e., high-sloped beaches) does not exist within the project area. A review of the NCNHP database of raze species and unique habitats on December 11, 2002, depicts no occurrences of the leatherback sea turtle within or near the proj ect area. West Indian Manatee Biological Conclusion: No Effect Suitable habitat for the West Indian manatee (i.e., sufficient depth of at least five feet [1.5 meters]) does not exist within the project study area. The NCNHP has no records Natural Systems Report for B-4088, Craven County Executive Summary 4 Natural Systems Report for B-4088, Craven County Executive Summary of any known populations of the West Indian Manatee within cone-mile radius of the project study area. No impacts to this species from project construction are anticipated. Red-Cockaded Woodpecker Biological Conclusion: No Effect Suitable habitat for the red-cockaded woodpecker (RCW) (i.e., old pine stands) within or neaz the project study area does not exist. In addition, large agricultural fields fracture the landscape generating boundaries that RCW do not typically cross. Therefore, a large enough area of appropriate habitat is not located within the prof ect study area. The NCNHP lists no documented occurrences of the RCW within 5 miles of the project study azea. No impacts aze anticipated to the RCW because of project construction Sensitive Jointvetch Biological Conclusion: No Effect Suitable habitat for the sensitive jointvetch (i.e., intertidal canes neaz the edge of the tidal fluctuation) does not exist within the project study area. A review of the NCNHP database of rare species and unique habitats on December 11, 2002, depicts no occurrences of the sensitive jointvetch within or near the project area. Surveys for these species are valid for two years from the survey data. If the project is not constructed within those two years, the species may need to be resurveyed before the let date. Conclusions The project study area contains an approximately 7.2-acre (3.0 ha) jurisdictional wetland area. Since no alternatives have been selected, impacts to these "Waters of the United States" cannot be determined. Nationwide Permit #23 and #33 and a Section 401 General Water Quality Certification may also be required for the project. No federally protected species aze likely to be impacted by this project. During replacement of the bridge, construction of an onsite temporary detour bridge, use of existing roadways for an off-site detour, or construction of an offsite temporary detour bridge will be required. Approximately 7.2 acres (3.0 ha) of riverine wetlands are located within the floodplain of Branch Upper Broad Creek throughout the project study area. If an off-site detour is not feasible and an onsite temporary bridge crosses the riverine wetlands, a geotechnical investigation of the wetland substrate's consolidation potential will have to be performed Construction of a temporary detour bridge within the wetland area will potentially degrade the ability of the wetland to function as well as it did before extreme compaction or distortion of the substrate occurred from the weight of the bridge. The existing causeway is comprised of compacted soils and is abutted by wetlands to the north and south. The causeway extends beyond the wetlands associated with the floodplain of Branch Upper Broad Creek. Removal of sections of the existing causeway, thereby lengthening the bridge, has the potential to impact abutting wetlands. Based on the width of the stream channel relative to the existing causeway, lengthening the bridge will not improve surface flows. Natural Systems Report for B-4088, Craven County Executive Summary 6 5u~ject: ~UU6 Bridge Projects Date: Wed, 23 Jul ?003 l-x:37: IO -000 From: Bill Arrington <Bill .-~rringtonLncmail.net> Organization: NC DENR DCIvt To: "Goodwin, William" <bgoodwin~a dot.state.nc.us> CC: "Brittingham, \"Cathy" <C3thy.Brittingham@ncmail.net» :ii Bill, i finally visited all the sites in the coastal counties. The =ollowinq are my comments for t:~e proposed bridge replacement sites: 3-3811 - No DCM jurisdiction • B-4021 - No DC;K jurisdiction 8-4022 - 1 have received no request or_nforaation 3-4023 - Public Trust Area (PTA) and Public T=ust Shoreline (PTS) Areas of Environmental Concern (AFC's) `:ellow light project - Access to the =ara road approximately 50' ,:rpm the br'_dge in the north past quadrant should be maintained 3'-4025 - ?TA and PTS AFC's. Yellow light project along the creels in t:~e north east and north west maintained. ~ - 9-4027 - ?TA and PTS AFC's. Green 1_ght project H-4073 - PTA and PTS AFC's. Yellow light project approximately 180 feet rrom the soutz east cor^e be maintained. ~ 3-4085 - PTA and PTS AFC's. Green i_ght project ` H-4088 - No DC~I jurisdiction 3-4151 - No DC:4 jurisdiction - Access to the roads quadrants should be - Access to driveway r of the bridge should 3-4224 - ?TA and PTS AFC's. Green lghL project 3-4225 - yc DC:'! juradiction 3-4225 - `to :.C~a juradict'_on ~. 3-4228 - Vo DC:~! ;urisdiction - 3-4313 - 'Jo ~C'~ jurydiction 3-4420 - to 3r":! =lr~.sd_ction 3-4431 - ?'!'e"-. 3r~ ?"_',i r.Lr' J. ]~GCn _:h~ Jr'~'cr,- , 3-4435 - %T=. 3r_c ?n... =:F~'~, ^.rac.• _. :n. :iri~cr~ ~6?1aCl':~ _..^.F ^,C:r1CJF; `_haC :lz'l~: .~r„~ .:Cr:. _mGd~'-.. iJlr:i 3 a-Tl~-at Dt].~1~]P O[1 _^? 3dmF ~i-.nmeac Yl,'1.: '7Ud--i'/ ::~ :1 ;r+nc_! __ ;~c.rm~ . 1n!1 .5::~1:L? ~ _' ~' °_ .:.mF ,O .~:f~l~. .~C=_ .1'? f5?~1-=:. .:mc.~!: _:G.._;dr_7n, _':9 .•'sn: •'t:j3C°n~ _-anCLdn :r:G~f' Z~.'---:(3r..~if:.. ~r_ ~ir:.•ci o~~ .r~!jlnl7 C;r~. ~ ~.^.. ': ;".a :)C :~~~: ~:, :~: ~: ... ..-. :r//~C~ ..C .. '~:~ if ,.1 =l:~i: ~l.i'1, _ .:=1 G:. _:!~~ •1~ in ,i'F aatJUr br_aae Jr causeway a~Ce2a~.^.u ttia al_Jwabla _moacts -~_ the ~enaral permit or construct_nq the br~dQe Jn a new al_cnment would :equine the 3Dp11C3t_On for a ~aM.~ mayor oer-ilt 3s weal 3s more coordination oetween COT and OCM and additional time to process the permit appl_cation Thank you .or expla~n_na the process _~r this veers br,dQe scooines I appreciate your et_orts to nest=acute ttie lists oz oro~ects we_1 _n advance o. the comment aeadl_ne oe~_eve zest year will work more smoothly Hill o stem E a ement PROGRAM August 28, 2006 Mr. Gregory J. Thorpe, Ph.D. Environmental Management Director Project Development and Environmental Analysis Branch North Carolina Department of Transportation 1548 Mail Service Center Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1548 Dear Dr. Thorpe: Subject: EEP Mitigation Acceptance Letter: ~p ~ ~E~F~ o ;,:,r ..:. ~ GF 6`~~~ . ` L,~~rq~~~~ ~~~ F~~~ Or y Hy B-4088, Replace Bridge 74 over Upper Broad Creek on SR 1615, Craven County The purpose of this letter is to notify you that the Ecosystem Enhancement Program (EEP) will provide the compensatory riparian wetland mitigation and buffer mitigation for the subject project. Based on the information supplied by you in a letter dated August 8, 2006, the impacts are located in CU 03020202 of the Neuse River Basin in the Southern Outer Coastal Plain (SOCP) Eco-Region, and are as follows: Riparian: 0.3 8 acre Zone 1 Buffer: 2,236 square feet Zone 2 Buffer: 1,903 square feet The NCDOT estimated buffer impacts in the 7-year Impact Projection Database submitted to EEP in February 2006. The buffer mitigation required for the NCDOT's impact projections was incorporated into EEP's biennial budget that was submitted to the NCDOT for approval in Apri12006. All buffer mitigation requests and approvals are administrated through the Riparian Buffer Restoration Fund. The NCDOT will be responsible to ensure that the appropriate compensation for the buffer mitigation will be provided in the agreed upon method of fund transfer. Upon receipt of the NCDWQ's Buffer Certification, the NCDOT will provide the EEP a copy of the Certification along with a letter verifying the buffer impact/mitigation amounts and RP~StDY0009... ~ ... PYOtect~ OG~ ltate I~D~ENR North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program,1652 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 21699-1652 / 919-115-0476 / www.nceep.net requesting a fund transfer to provide the required compensation. The EEP will transfer funds from the MOA Account (Fund 2984) into the Riparian Buffer Restoration Fund (Fund 2982) and commit to provide the appropriate buffer mitigation to offset the impacts associated with this project. At that time, the EEP will be responsible for the buffer mitigation required for this project. Mitigation for this project will be provided in accordance with the Memorandum of Agreement between the N. C. Department of Environment and Natural Resources, the N. C. Department of Transportation, and the U. S. Army Corps of Engineers. EEP will commit to implementing sufficient compensatory riparian wetland mitigation to offset the impacts associated with this project by the end of the MOA year in which this project is permitted. If the above referenced impacts amounts are revised, then this mitigation acceptance letter will no longer be valid and a new mitigation acceptance letter will be required from EEP. If you have any questions or need additional information, please contact Ms. Beth Harmon at 919-715-1929. Sincerely, ~~ Wi liam D. Gilmore_ P.E. EEP Director cc: Mr. William Wescott, USACE-Washington Mr. John Hennessy, Division of Water Quality, Wetlands/401 Unit File: B-4088 STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PLAN State Project: 33446.1.1 (B-4088) Craven County April 18, 2005 The project involves the removal and replacement of Bridge Number 74, in its existing location, carrying SR 1615 over Morgan Swamp in Craven County. The existing two lane, sixty nine foot long bridge will be replaced with a two lane, ninety foot long cored slab bridge. Morgan Swamp has a Class C, Sw, and NSW classification. The overall length of the project is 0.15 miles. SR 1615 will be closed during construction. The existing roadway is a two lane (nine foot lanes), eighteen foot paved road with six foot wide grassed shoulders . The proposed roadway will be a two lane (twelve foot lanes), twenty four foot paved road, with eight foot wide grassed shoulders. The proposed bridge width will be thirty three feet wide while the existing bridge width is twenty nine feet. Approximately 0.11 acres of additional pavement will be added as a result of the project. The following best management practices and measures were taken during the design of the project to reduce the stormwater impacts: 1. Drainage from the proposed bridge deck will be conveyed off the bridge and into a drainage system located beyond the end of the low side of the bridge and outside of Buffer Zone 2. A rip rap pad located at the end of the pipe system will dissipate the waters energy before draining into adjacent wetlands. 2. The roadway typical section width has been narrowed to the extent practical in order to minimize impacts to the wetlands (existing on both sides of the roadway) and to a blue line stream running along the toe of the fill slope at the north east approach. 3. Ditching through the wetlands is being avoided. 4. The roadway typical section consists of grass shoulders, fill slopes, and ditches with side slopes of 3:1 or flatter. ~- ~ N ~ ~ ~ r. r~ ~ 4 d a L_ o~-srrE n.~rnr~x ~ ~,dCINI°JC~' ~~~~ N~~®T DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS CRAVEN COUNTY PROJECT: 8.2171301 (B-088) REPLACEMENT OF BRIDGE N0.7~ ON SR 1615 OVER MORGAN SWAMP pE4~M,~T pR~wIHf~S G10RTH CAPOLII~J%` ,~_ ;~ __ . ~, t `r... -"V y~--.. ,_ ~ `- - ~ ~~ ~, L ~~ li I .1 ~~ .,.lip.. ~''~~' .+~.... .- * 1 li' .• ~- ~ ~ 4 I I ~.. i.r., it I a .: 1 • II 11 1 *Glw I I~ 11~ It?1 ... , rr I I i 11:, ' ''T I 1 . ra 1''J't_3. .. I },II} {i, I I 11 3 ~ i.-.._.~,-r.~ ~,I ,} = I-_~~~aFi I i}J I ~ , r~,'~IllriyrW :yam i . ~ 1 i:N ~. I:IJ} ~ 'I~ i- i 'i~il!^"1r ~!~il 'i' ~ :: is , to r 3J I I:~1 ~' i l ~'Mrr .. ;. !~ ~: h?i!i~?:;;1:i,'.1 1 r j.l~ ; ?+. }_~il ra''aP.:.... 1..: ..is . : ~ : ~13:.. ..1' r.: '1..: .( i. .:~!~'ii' ii~S.:i;" I";~?.a'~;.j?'~'1 I:~:L:~ k. ihi:: .,. 1,::::_lijl: J ... ,~ ~ ...~J. .. .:.: J.i ....:.:..:..:.i+" *~~ •.?3:i- 111 r _ :1:rJ i r ~. ~.:.:.r.i .:..:.~.:... .. r.:, :,. .:.r.:..:.r:. ,r.: ' ~ 3::.. }:ii:: sa.:::r...i:.ra:li,::..:i::. .~ _ - ~ - ::,~s ";:1 ~..'.. ~~ ., 11:I~J?;: .:::1Jx-g}ti :1.1: _~.:i:c,, `'-~::i3 ,}.;31 ., a:l:l~j _~. +.,~ --- r.:~., - .. r.:.: _. ,}, „-}:I:.:.I..r, :_3.1..:. J.,v.:.:.:.1:::.::1 _ 31.:1;. :.:.:..,.. ':'.::,}:i::: 1 I v.r .,,.r.: ~ .Irv}:; ~!' .:1..; ~J:j9: ti ;,.: .41.:.1+;.1.~ ,:. ;. ~.;;.1 ...:: 'p'w .:.r::.;ai~ ~ Ly. '~;-, .11.r. -.:''L ~1;~-:11_...~ ..,.:!:I,:.I:1}i' ~ a.:aa;33`' 1;J3r:•.,-..... ~ :. ii:a:, ~,; .1'1 .....r...:.r.:,.:~...a:¢'rl:':Ia7.r_i:::r,..r,;!,;::w..l~~ .:.!}1!s. i.'3i!?.:. IyaiJ,!: ...... :. __.: , ia1;1.. , !.,__,,.111;11:.}jl _ i:rJ::.: }:}.::I:i ,11.I;:riti3..i .:: _....r:.:..:.:.. _ i,:+:..11...:.1,::i'}2:,J::1]:1}i;.I;;„•11=:c:;.r,.:.,., :;.;.r.r. _.......: I~y..,;_.:::::.:.:.:.:::.::.:: J.. .r.:;.r,. .y:~ 1 I.::v.:.:.r.: iii.F.i'}u ii.v,.::e =.I.i..v i..::. v.r.ii:'^:1 - - ...... .LI. - =!1}i}};11:jai,.!1i:;~11~;.,~:q}cj}~q;1:4'~!:i:i. .xl:~I, ';a;i1;::;dE _ J i t J 11~ 1 I i; ~ i ~ 1-ii:.. ': i~ 1~1~:11:ei i .Fij yj; i ~___.- li LI iqJ I II X111 ,,i 41 , io-~~':~? ;,. 1.19'a 1+•?~_;:~1; Ii' I .. _ ' f 1 r33,.r::,: !?.:. i ii 1 I J 1 '.'1 '. ' ~~ ':Iaiii~: i i ii:'?:1:: Ii~ 1 , ! 1,1 L ,.~ :1::.~ ;:.:.... ~ ~...:.._. i x;11.::.,.:::;1; .. ~ I:.,:!•:I:;: r:;} 1a l:':1.: ~.i:1'I:I:I ~.... ::...r,.:..r... I ~~ '. r1 1.: . J ,:... I.::;.:.rg:i.;;,.:.:.::?:....:. ' :.. 'i.;:,.;;_.:.;:,.1:.r1}} 1~„ 1 j l! 11:i 11 +A1.,, j::# '` ~:.I s .; {}111}:11}j:i::i ;=::11=;:13:;: .1 1 ~~: t ': .. r.r.::.:,..~.r.r.r„v;:,.r.:: ,::. :{.:11' 1 _}}~'' 3~.311li~N~I}=:iai: }::_~'.:.i:;. ~: _ 1:,: ~ - '~ 1'. :.: ,.:.:.1::...... r _ r 1 -. ~'cJ11jJ~J'1_':;31:;;1111113:..:.;.:.:.. .i I i- :i~,} li•i_ v: ..i}:.:.: } i 1:1':11 ~J:11.r. 11,1:1 r ~... 3:41.,.:xr_v :+1:!11x': ' `i3:i1}-~...,J r J. ~ I .. '1a..1„ .i ...:.I..:iJ. : ai..ia.1; ~ yi;. .:r:i:.:i: 1; .r;..,. .: ..... I iL:u.:, ..:.~,.r~.,.~.I;i.;.y: ..f.n..;.:3. .:.:I:~:!'.'~~.~1:i~J3~:E1~.'~,:!~~i:i'}i:! ''i~::ri~;;:Jd,il:i!~~~1 ~~Jij3ii~i133'.':~rdi 'a11~1 ;: 111 I• ~ 11 ;.} I ~ ;~ 1 y 11iai Ilii it ,j1 I 1:1;1:: ' ~ 1 { i 113. . :_~~c r. A. '_. .. ..:.a it ~.. ~ r._.'- +i'.. la,::::::_.:..:; ..,;, ,.. .:. •...: ....:. NOT TO SCALE ~~~®~ ~j ~ ~ DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS CRAVEN COUNTY PROJECT: 8.2171301 (B-~088> REPLACEMENT OF BRIDGE N0.7~1 ON SR 1615 OVER MORGAN SWAMP SHEET ~ OF 7 110' 07 A OS -WLB WETLAND BOUNDARY WETLAND L ® DENOTES FILL IN WETLAND DENOTES FILL IN SURFACE WATER ® DENOTES FILL IN SURFACE WATER (POND) T T:.DENOTES TEMPORARY FILL IN WETLAND DENOTES EXCAVATION E ~ IN WETLAND DENOTES TEMPORARY TS -;:TS;. FILL IN SURFACE WATER * • DENOTES MECHANIZED • • •' • * = CLEARING -~- -~ FLOW DIRECTION TB ~-- TOP OF BANK WE EDGE OF WATER - - ~ - - PROP. LIMIT OF CUT - - ~- - PROP. LIMIT OF FILL -~- PROP. RIGHT OF WAY - - NG- - NATURAL GROUND - - PL - . PROPERTY LINE -TDE- TEMP. DRAINAGE EASEMENT - PDE - PERMANENT DRAINAGE EASEMENT - EAB- - EXIST. ENDANGERED ANIMAL BOUNDARY - EPB- • EXIST. ENDANGERED PLANT BOUNDARY - -~ - - - WATER SURFACE Xx XXX X X LIVE STAKES BOULDER --- COIR FIBER ROLLS PROPOSED BRIDGE PROPOSED BOX CULVERT PROPOSED PIPE CULVERT 12'-48' (DASHED LINES DENOTE PIPES EXISTNG STRUCTURES) 54' PIPES & ABOVE SINGLE TREE . .. .. .. .. .. .. WOODS LINE DRAINAGE INLET ROOTWAO RIP RAP 5 ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNER OR PARCEL NUMBER IF AVAILABLE PREFORMED SCOUR HOLE LEVEL SPREADER (L S) DITCH / GRASS SWALE l~l `l.~® Jl DIVI5ION OF HIGHWAYS CRAVEN COUNTY PROJECT; 82171301 (B-~088> REPLACEMENT OF BRIDGE N0.7~ ON SR 1615 OVER MORGAN SWAMP SHEET .3 OF 7 11f07/OS ~~®~~~~ 1L ®V'V' ~~~sy NAMES AND ADDRESSES PAIaCEL N®. NAMES ADDRE5SE5 Noted This entire project can be built within the existing right of wayo I~T~C~®7C DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS CRAVEN COUNTY PROJECT: 8.2171301 <B-~088) REPLACEMENT OF BRIDGE N0.7~ ON SR 1615 OVER MORGAN SWAMP SHEET T OF 7 11 / 07 / OS a ~ oc ° z~ ,~ ~ o I ® {D~ ~ 1~3yy F fly z v ai m 1 ~ l1 .f~ytiy r~ O I.~ X01 \/ ~ m ~ ° Q j C ~ U z~ Wp o ® ~ ~ U "' U ~ ~ ~ O~ ~ '' ~ A °' a n H ~' ~ `~ z ~ o / ~ I o l ~ o of of a I ~ I a ~ 01 ~ ® ® ~ of o b ~ ~ ~ ® ~ ~ I ~ ~~ I ~ ~ (~ ® U ~ ~ ~ ® b ~ ~ • rr ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 4) ~ en o ~ l ~ ~ '~ I "~ ~ U ® ~ ~' ~ Q~ m 3 ' I ~ ~ ~ Z ~ Q ~ a= zm z = O ~ o ~ ~ O C~ Z W O O > ~ U a~ caw ~ ~_ ~ ~ ~ U d ~ Z N ~ ~ ~ rn ° v w m N Q ~ W rn ~ I ~ o O Z ~ O ~ N N N W 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~ N W J N m U Q f0 3 E ~ m Q 7 a W `o Z o 0 0 0 `~ ~ O N C . y V f0 CL ~E Z '- N M et Q ~ F ~ N O N Z Z W O .... W ~ W Q r m d W -~. W p N Q ,-. M ~ C7 N M M ~ (MO W J m Q N W ~ CO N M H O v M ~ t1y ~ ~ ~ v '- N N ~ J O ~ N OOp M O ~ Q W ~ N J ~ U Q w ^ ~ N y Q ~ N O O l~ r O C O M ~ ~ N V N Q d -~ U a ~~ a W w w o ~ n- x x x x LL ~ m ~ C7 M W ~ (A ~ O X X X X ~ ~ U O O ~ O O _ O J J J S O ~ J ~ ~ ~ J ~. ~ 2 Q p C~ f`O') ~ op _~ ~ Q' `_ ~ ~ ~ lA iy ~ + t l!) } ~ + ~ ~ + N 0 0 r N O _ N N ~ N N N N w N N ~w ~ d m m ~ '~ U ~ ~ m m m ` m ~ F J w ~ N C7 ~ ~ ~ O ~ Q 0 Z N O Q N ~ ~ W ~ a ¢ ~ ~ m 3 z ~ `~ o F- S ,, U . p ~ ~ E Z > ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 0 ~ ~ a > ~ o m a 3 U Z F G~ o- a~ a 3 c a> O . ~ c m w 0 c o _ U c 0 U 0 N f0 3 a~ U 7 N N L_ O U m a E m a~ c . ~ . ~ N 'D N L C D7 .N N N 7 U w o ~ N v Z 2 m E ~ m .rn .~ ~ N of ~ m +`. a~ v Z ~ ~ ~ c c v a U . N m o.~~ vE~ a W ~ c ~ N m C U W C :. c m m ~ F- ,NmaE ~ L WvEn . W U N LL ri. ~ ~ fD U ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Q C N N ~, C G '~~ a~ ~ 0 0 ~ ~~ ~- o W E ~ •- ~ a U Q a N ~' ~ • ~ o .. ~ ~ U ~ ~ ~ ~ W v ~ ~ ~ v j,,, a "-_~ ~ ~ ~ L ~ ~ ~ O O ~U~-- o o J U ~ ,c ~ a o ~' ~ m v ~ Z ~•~ ~`° g > X w W N a~~~ E__ ,~ F- LL ~ .., c ~ ~ c c _ m_ i° m o ~ O N d J J N LL _ ~~ 2 V O c m a~ ~ ~ a « a J to C ~ O + N J ~ ~ O ~ ~ t v ~ N t r N « % O ~ _ (~ Z O I OFF~ITE DEVOUR N]EgJ~]E I8. ~U1F1F~R ~g~ INY~f°~' ~,~u~s ~~~® ~L DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS CRAVEN COUNTY PROJECT: 8.2171301 (B-~088) REPLACEMENT OF BRIDGE N0.7~ ON SR 1615 OV$R MORGAN SWAMP D10RTH CAROLIfVA it ~ j ~ d ~• `~, ~. `'~ ® •,~ .4 _ tr i ; .. i' ~f i X43 i i ,_ I' i :r li~il J.aI 1 ~' ~ ~~ ~~ ai 1aJ :~ 'ifI a -~ .. ~~ i i:9x i, I:r~ ~i;, i t I i i f ~~ . . J I d 1. - i al ;~~, 1 iJ i ~'ai:~::: i . a 1 1 ' ~ ; i j# • a h; J;iili-i.l.:;;{.p . A . J~ ii ,:.:, ~~.ril I1,.11da:l~:l ~i3~M i V ;.,;. " J:iL:~:.:.ii.fa?~':;. r ~t6''li~.i~%1!:;i~i il;!ci~:;i~;i...LL..,, ... ._ _ :I:i'.i;i'ii~~.yiii7~:r':1;ii'i7~"ii :;i. id:f:!;-is€}i:.::f::;.r.:.a:. _:..;I. ~ f ~'`k~.r~} ~ ~;: it i d li ;:;.i;::9;... 1 i 11. ; / ii , li Ii r::.:rdds~iij:,V ~ ~ i~ ,~[~~itl:.. ') ~ - r~ ~:. ~. 1 i'.,}fi:l.: a:i{t~ '. a li.r. .. i19J i.i;.;~;:e:i::": :ii. :.j.y .. J :.:.:.r.:...,: ~ a . ~:c:.r.l.: ..;.r....a.:.:.1,..'::i:.:.r.r.:.:J.:;.r.:.rJ .~!;: r :~i:{::_ :I :.::..:.:..:.:.:.1.:.: !...:.r.:.:.:.r.:;:l.,::..::. - .,.;...::;.:. ..... ..__r::c.... ...,,:I_r.::.~r.:.r,.:...r.:. ~:.r.~;;.:.;.;. iii ii:i:~;:::::,.;. {j ,,: _...... r .: r.. 'i 9 ':~'i:::.:t":''. .:ih'j :I;lis ;,!,~. 'i:id:!_ - -:iili.,.l.. ;:. ,,:.rix1::;;EC:...,..... :I:.:::,a:,ajila:::;a,::aa:r:; ,':;x3 ._.r.Ia. .;:;a. ~~I:ii',:;:i~~. `` ~:xr.::::a:::..a ..:.dda:i:,a;' i:::C;_iii:i;: ~. .r!'''.'i;i i,,;a - :.,.: , .:., :Ji;i;.;.:.y.r. i:iaa'iiii:ivi as _ :i:ia:i:aiix 'ii~rj:ji'a'...a ,.: :... ..r.:.::_,.r_i.:•:'i.i. .rv.l!.:•i;:++i r.r.i.:;]1i.. i.r.:i:1:Li'.. ~ i:i:li. 't':la:i:;::.... ri:Ii: i:~i:i.,.:: ,.; .....ia: '':'.;,_:7a:i ;_J~:I.r„ .. .I...., ~J• ~ , r:.ri.,.... ~~~~~}:Iva: A:ia..:~ ;eu_I:!:l: isisl"v.:i:j:l:'~~I:i~i{?:;i:;J:;: ;i':I:i~J:l.;. ~ t:i,~ '~1;: a:' . : . ' :}:I i JI J ~ f ;' a ~ ; f 1 'i i,l~ i ~ ~i : r.:.i - ~' -:r.L'Ji~!,ti:: :... ~ :_i ;.:~;._ ar. aa~.,;:r1q. .iir.. .,I tar .,, q.~:;;~}7r~{:iJi o.c': ~I:L':..~: '._:r.::i~jiJ~»9~ P ..fo-; :~:.i :.:::I..:... ,.. ,.. ,~ aa:.-:i~ 19dr,: .' :. _. -- f '~ dl a. 1 ~ ,: '~. ,'>#. f 1 ~' 1 idi~~ii i:~~i jiia j i'~;~ 1'~i'',',-~:'',~':11~ Iti 1, ~. 1,..d. ~ H a... '..111 fiJJ.:. ;, . 79aj~: i7i .:.r !i . _.:: i:ia o-.;.:,~.rd.l:.I:~.. ...L 9 };11: aa1: ..q~~r ' i i . . • ;.::i.'.::.Isr.!,. J:17~. :I i ';TEi: did~J~"~ ,:Ii;:i '±i=J:li:i Tr: ~:I. " ii~~1'A:i :;i"'a t :..rt'..ri..;?:, i::.r.r::.::::ls?.::., .:_~.. ....;. 1:.:. , .::.. r.. .. _ !{.iA.. ~id:!:::::idJ j}ii::.r ; ~a~ .r -ai:l....'"-:i:;1;I;.::i ~.I.i.!;.~ _ `; ~~a~ ;::I.......r.r_ . m~ ...:a. i~:i::.: r,_:,:3:i: ! 1:i~:i:i:t:.: - - ~.:j:i±.I .. .:: aJ:.:.:. ~.: .r:i:i.a:,.,:: :.,J.:.:. :.i.:.:.r,. Ii:ia::. ::id:i:i::: ~".i: I.:'~::I:[ :I'=Ji:'.: ~. i:~ I: {';I.~ ~~c9:1;,.:.r.i~:r . ~ ;.;;.::: J ::i:li:l'pL~ L:~ ~ I:I:c 'ti. :.:. .. ;. :.. i.: i:l:~;, ;~.I.lii.:.l .:; :. :i~S.J.r:a:i:':!;d';'dii:l.::1: :I:4xJ~l:i ~I~:'r.~~i:li'=;:::;,1:. ~ i::,r i:;: I: d.... ; ~,~:I:Lif:~: J.":. ' i _ • .; ~~':~ ~~iai:l1=:;- ;.{•::J_.:.: .r.l..:: d:: ~~y ~~,: `'~ lij; :~.j :~.:..:.::.r::::.,.; .u...I:J. i. ::.:raiiff. .. J.i.:.. .._ .:1J::r:JJ.:.r.r:.:;i,.....r.:.r d: Vida +;:L:,:I . ' 1.I;i~; :i,ili:rl~1~:!.i~_+iii~ ~i~}Y:il~ iiliddddd~ i!'ii iiai:i;J:2x: ;.I..J]1t.I.;, i::i:i _ 'd;.:;.r.i~l-:vt i .i. ~ :;{.;:r.;ii __ :td.I:LIi :. :j]}!:fJ{?:r ;.r ; 'a ~ ~' •- !:L'!iri.'. a~ia'y:iaa9l:.i;a~ d;?•iLiar=': -~:Ij i;.:',a d dj ~ }, ' I ~ aJ.r:::::: d3'Ei_!:. ,~r: ~';;d1:;:p::d;?.~iad~i,l~ ai d~tr.;3;~~,_::.:;':j;d ;II. ~J_!.,Jd,;i:1.t r.arl_ .. ~>: * ~ i I~liial jJii d»i~rl~. ,1,3 d it~ ii ;,fr"~!WIi i i drr:l:i -ji:; i i iii:':.:: a: a:!aa:.: ~ ~, a3 ~I I i i ' .. ;.:.i.ra.r.;: ,~~; l i Yl i .'j a i f IJ a a~ J~ :. M.: '~ ' ..:ai3::.;.: f.13:,:;:'? 'irµ.a.:: ~~ ::; ~.: ~ad:r : J.; .i_ra_; _ ... , _ +; .. ~ . _aaaaa:;:-;.:i:,J.::!'.Y!:°~.. ..... I fs~*i..:... :'ii; °.ai; i.::': ~ s. ;.::::.. J1 1 :i:'~.ii. ...: .. ,:,a~i-.~ij,,..:,;. . ,. rr~r.?.r.... 'ir 1 .~ -~. i.l, ., ;~i:l':.~iii:: .:: ,:: ai aa::.l, as :}r :cr.:... _ .i:~.:;,. {;~i~'1.~` ~ L:_:...~. + . !'_: da'd'~•' Vii; :Id~?L.~~:;; ~. ~~:ii[I: :::! .r,.i.~.;j.:.r1-:~ia d.:.:.J_:;J.;d..:Idi '!~1' iJ:~:i:l I: d :.I. 1 "';.:.,;. ,. ..~ a:... ;. :~: - ~ a.;sr.i:r i;l.,.y._.rJa.G :iillrid' ~i:r fJ:I~t~;1;11i:f:k=:1.. ~di•i:'~a~.IJa.;...._.:. :. ,a:.; • :1::. ra:.r:..:::.r..: :. :.:, ~: a:. ' r.,;:'-..r..,d.~. ,'''~. ;:~-ii'ii:...::J~;i~,lid:li~3~1:_:i~:i: ;:,~= I. ;.:;:i.r : ;i..: - - : r 1 ;,,. ...:.r ..., .. :... J-;ii i :i; r j ::.:i::.:::i3 :::.:...........:. r:: ' -:: :.I.; iai.~, i'i:ii::: ,.: ::..iJ.. r.r .;.:...:a;:;' a,::11::'i .. ,.... Ila ......::.I~:!:i:i.:.t ~ :. J:..I:::lj:,...r...r..i.,,.f.l~;.~}ja;,Ji.;'.~;='' .:.: ...r .....::....... .:.d.r ,. ~;.I::laa:j: ..I:::.iii~:r'.: {:::i{a:. •ia J.s~ii:id:1.'li}:;.:;:i;'.ji;:~~Idd:~':: i "xi.w_.:y.:.r.:. ::. ...,1 r.. t+:•r q:':i';i:r..i:ua: ,.: ,.,:I:_~s':.:;:`:pl:; ad;_~.~'..:..:;;.y ;;~;.;.. i ai Id I J ... ~ i ..J:.:....r:a - `_ i.. ~ J ''- r' r.rJ..rd:: ~ :: __.. o-;; as: n.::.,:. ..r. _..:J:....:.. ,,..,, ..:..,,.r. .r.:.:::.:;.:;.::.:.:. . ,.... NOT TO SCALE ~TI~I~T~IE If~o IBl~JI~I~1~1~ ~~~®~ DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS CRAVEN COUNTY PROJECT: 8.2171301 (B-088) REPLACEMENT OF BRIDGE N0.7~ ON SR 1615 OVER MORGAN SWAMP SHEET ,Z OF 7 11 B 07 B 05 ~u~~~~ ~,~~~~~ -WLB WETLAND BOUNDARY PROPOSED BRIDGE L WETLAND PROPOSED BOX CULVERT ALLOWABLE IMPACTS ZONE I PROPOSED PIPE CULVERT 12'-48' (DASHED LINES DENOTE PIPES ALLOWABLE IMPACTS ZONE 2 EXISTNG STRUCTUR ES) 54' PIPES & ABOVE ~ MITIGABLE IMPACTS ZONE I SINGLE TREE ® MITIGABLE IMPACTS ZONE 2 . .. .. .. .. WOODS LINE - BZ - RIPARIAN BUFFER ZONE ~ DRAINAGE INLET - BZ1 - RIPARIAN BUFFER ZONE 1 l' 30 f t (9.2m) ~ = ROOTWAD - BZ2 - RIPARIAN BUFFER ZONE 2 20 ft (6.1m) RIP RAP -~- -~ FLOW DIRECTION ~ ..- TOP OF BANK ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNER WE 5 OR PARCEL NUMBER EDGE OF WATER IF AVAILABLE - -~ - PROP. LIMIT OF CUT PREFORMED SCOUR HOLE (PSH) - -F - PROP. LIMIT OF FILL --~- PROP. RIGHT OF WAY LEVEL SPREADER (LS) - - NG - - NATURAL GROUND - -P-~ - PROPERTY LINE -TDE- TEMP. DRAINAGE ~ DRASS SWALE EASEMENT -PDE- PERMANENT DRAINAGE EASEMENT - EAB- • EXIST. ENDANGERED ANIMAL BOUNDARY - EPB- • EXIST. ENDANGERED PLANT BOUNDARY - - -~ - - - WATER SURFACE ~~~®~ X Xx x X LIVE STAKES DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS X CRAVEN COUNTY BOULDER PROJECT: 8.2171301 (B-~f088) - - - COIR FIBER ROLLS REPLACEMENT OF BRIDGE N0.74 ON SR 1b15 OVER MORGAN SWAMP SHEET 3 OF 7 116 076 05I ~~®~~~ ~L ~L ®~~~~~ NAMES AND ADDRESSES PARCEL N®. NAMES ADDRESSES Noted This entire project can be built within the existing right of wayo N~~®~ DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS CRAVEN COUNTY PROJECT:82171301 (B-4088) REPLACEMENT OF BRIDGE N0.7~! ON SR 1615 OVER MORGAN SWAMP SHEET '~ OF 7 l l .d 07 / 05 a ~o o~ z~ ~ ~" ~ o ; z J ® ~' ~ ~ z ~ ~' A~ a m I ~ ® Q ~ t~ " 3 ~- ~ W V M i G~. ~ O I ~ o E ? ~ r ; w O ® ~a U ti w~ h ~ ~ ~ U ~ ~~ 1 ° °" a ~ ~- ^~~ ~ w a z w ~ o ~ ~ I ~ f o of ~I o I I ~ ~ °ol ~ ® ® e~ ~ I o ~+ ~ ~ ~ I ® ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ U ~ °~ ® ~ ~ \ ~ ~ ~ ~ I o ~ I ~ '~ ~ m 3 ` I ~ . ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ z b b ; ~ w= ~ ~ ' g ~ z ~~ ~~m aZ ~ ~' `~ a s G W O J ~ J a o ~ ~H Q o~c vWi= ~ °" O~ ~ !i doG ~ 1 d~ ~ O ~ U LL Z~ ~ ~n in'L O `IW' y ~O ~ N O~ Ha Q w O. Vf Z ~ ~ ~ ¢s /~ o O ~, a ~ ~ a a .~ \ L ~ d ~ a ~a ~ C3 @3 a ~ Gp C3 \1 \~ 1 ~3 ~ 1 11 ' d 1 I 1 I i L I I II I I ` I ~ I I ~_ __ I -~. t l ~ ~ '~ ~ -,~ . ~ , . .gyp ~ i I ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ I I ~~~ i i ~5d ~ ~ I ~ I I I~l 11 / / ~ ~ I,,. ~~ ~ ~ ~i Y / ~"b ~ ~ I ~ ' ~ I` ~~: ,l 1 I SZ a ~~i ~ ~r ~ I ~ a I7 M1 \ L I: ~~~ ~ / ~~ ~J d z I\~ II ~ i i I , I ~ I 7f ~ _~ I I I ~ 1 I I I ~ ~ I I I rl ~ ~N ' b I I ~i {~ £ -~..\~ ~ ~'-- 66/LI/ 4s ON j ~ ~ m a W ~ V1 ~ Qm} ~ J J88N N ago ° ~ ° Q~.G ° Jz ~ M N W `~ ~ b s~ 4'- ~ ~ -ti ~~i ,~ii~. ~6~, i,. N I ~~ ~p i I i 1 d+ I I I P ~ ~ I~ I ~ i I~ I I SNOISU~Y r O O ' ~ . ~~ 5 ~d ~,o \ ~~ a ~ > ~i a ~.... ~" s ~ ~ ~ v1a~ ~ ~ \4e ~ ~,~e ~ ~ s~ ~ ~9 f4~ ~ ~ i W°^ ~ ~~~~ ee-p~ ~.~ I W ~; ~ ~ ~ ~ `~' .ao ~ Y r J ~~ ywW W N ~ 'L ,L r r Y ~ ~ 1~2~ Y ~ r 1Q r ~. ~. ~ ~ 1 ~ ~ ~' ~ / ~ # \, \ er i \ ~ ~ ! ` r y / '1 :i r ..1 ~a, '~ ~ r r r I• 'i J~ ~ ~ r :& ~ ~ ~a ~\ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ a ~ ~ ~ ~ r r ~ r ~~~ ~~4~ ~ ~ r r .~\ ~ r r ~ r ~ ,~ ~ o ~ r ~ I 11 ~ ~ ~ P~ ~ 3 =~ ~ o ~ ~ .~v~=' ~~ 4~ ~g ~3i 'Y t`, NJ W W~ ~~ ~~0~ O 0 0 a o 0 'c~~do caw ~p Fy~:J 5`80 900 Z-NM-BZ y d z Q'I I ~ Z ~ es a= ~ ~ ~8 ~ Z ~ ~ ml Z ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ a= ~ ~ ag ~ a ~i W O ~ J ~ Q LL Q ~ ON~ ~ !, n.~ LL I ooo~ ~~ U p Z~ ~ ~ ~LL ~ ~ _ N ~_ ~ N ~ _~ W O I-~ aa. in Z I I I / a /~ 0 O \\ \\ \~ ~\ $ ~~ ' ~M1~ ~a . P ~ ~~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ w ,9 w SZ ~~~ii ~s~a 1° , ~ \ dY ae' ! a ~'~ '1 , ~ ~I (ul I ~~ I II 1 1 I II I ~ i u ~ 1 ` C3 1 , ~ 1 ~ ~ 1 II 1 I I I I II ' ~ I S 6 a )~J I 9 I ` I I I I 1 I ~ I I I y l I I I II ~ ` i y i ~T ~ I ~ I I "\ ~~ ~ i I I I ~ x~ ~ ~ `'' ~ ' ~ ~ ~ f I al: I~ ~ ~ I, I' 0 I I 7 I ~ ~~ W l/1 ~~ ~ ~. //~ ~~ ~~~J i ^' ~ W a ~ a `~ ~~ it is ~~ ~ ~~_~ •tZ 2,a:.i~is~ ~. e$ aNt am J S ~ ~ ~ ~ W ~ ~~ + N J'~~ o O ~... W ~ ~ Wr« O Qty ~ J~ ~ N aW ` `~ N .___ ~os , I r I ~~ I a I~ III I ~ ~ ail II I III II I ~~ I ~ '~~ I I I t~ ~I I ,I ~s a~ a I. -- ~ I ~ u II e `~V\ ~3 a a ,~ •. d L as ° ~3 ~3 a O O ~~ 5 ~a ~O ^\ J v / / \]~ C3 b ~ ~. -,., ~'~ ~ .~..~~ e~ ~ ~ ~a~ 0. ~ \4s ~ ~,~s ~. •~ ~,a uQw w w ~~ '~_ ~ ~ aW ~ ,R._ o ~ II a I C of '~ y~ ~ W ^~'~w• ~ w • ~~f ~ ~ / J 4 ~ W ~ ~ / W y=j ~ w ~ / / y 'L ~ / / l ~2~ ~y ~ 1Q,\ W w ~ ~ ~. L/ ~ ~ 1 5.. / ~\i\ \ ~' w ~ '~ ` \ / / ~\` w w / I \ w ~ ~, C~J ~ / ~ / i w w / 1 1 ~_ ~ 3~ ~ ~ / ~: ,~ w w $ ~ ~ ~ 1 1 ~ ~ o W ' M Y ~ ~ w\ w ~ w ~ I w w / o w 1 ~ ~ I ~ ~ ~~ '1 ~ ~ u ~ Z ~ ~~~~`' r~ LL~ ~~ NJJ tV Yl/-R w X~1 ~~ WF NJ ~U I" ~a~ ~~ I I I i I I I I I i Ip (F I~ Iti I ~~~nie 1 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ~ I s i~ i ,a, I ~ I I N Y I ~ I~ I FI it V ~ ^~ ~~I ~~u~ ~6p•a~w.ad- 0 O Q ~ N O -c~~sa~~no apFy.~:~ S°80 900Z-NM-BZ SNOISIA311 1:6 ~~ ~ N Q r ~ ~ ~ U r ~ r a~ ~@ ~~ O. ~x U ~~ ~~ ~ ~~ ~~ ~ U w ;u g _~ ~~ a ~~ ~~ LL' g a ~ ~~~ ~ ~\N ~ ~ ~ a ~~ ~ ~ ga O W„ '~ U ~ g ~ ~ h~ P `~ A ~ y ~ b Q' o '~ w ~ `~ y ~ ~x ~ ~+ ~ Q ~ ~ h ~ y ~ \ ~~ ~ ~ ~ $ `~ x ~ ±~ y ~ y~ W ~ N 4 1 ~~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ .tj~ ~~," ~ ~ ti m " ~ U ~.~ 4 ~ 1~~ ~ s ors ~. 0 O 0 W N 3 N W W ~ G~o H ~ ~ ~ ~ m d N U d O ~ m W Z U Q y H ~ 03~ _N ~o U N Z ~ 0 N ~ Z ~~a W N H U ~~ ~~ ~~ ~~ ~~ ~~ ~~ ~~ ~ ~ h h ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~e y ~ o Q~ `a N Q ~ 0 '$~,, Z~ 8~ ~ ` ~~a ~ ~~ $O~ ~O~ ~ H ~, a ~ ~ O N A ~ ~ f M ~ ~ o O ~ ~ II II II a°DO m ~ ~~o ~ ~G~ U ~ ~ °- °~ ~' O °- °' ~ ~ ~ F" a°C. ~ ~~d ~ F o oC N ~ C 1 .~ O a = H ~ ~~ ~ u u a a a u y G C~ O H~ ~ N ~ N ~ .~ g c 1F-, ~ ~ a y y ~ o U ~ ~ ~ a N N ~ h VVV y ~ O u6p•US~-~pa-BSObq\~o$~wdompoo$$$$ Sb~ll 9002-21VW-FI ~' a `" c ~ v ~ 3 ~' ~ ~ T 0 S ~~ $~ ~ ~ a a c ~ ~ ~ c D ~ O O O ~' s s ° N~o°m^s^ N 1 ~ ,J 3 ~ ~. o ~ ~ 1 e,~ • 1 I ~~ °s~~~' ~3soa~^~+~'~a~aaa'~'oaa8'a~~oo~~, 3 c a~~ o 3 C~ '~ ~~ ~. 3` c• Q N ~ ~ ~ o ~ ~ ~ ~ c a ~ 3 g s ~ ~ ~ 3 ~ ~ o ' ~ a ° 3 c ~ o ~ ~ c'a a ~' a ~' o ~ 3 0 ~ ~ ' ~ ;' O . °-~ g' 8 g' o g ~ ~ b hh ~i '' I I I I I~ x I I I I ~ ~ t~~°~ °i ~l l l l aaC S-~y 3 y~ n~~ ~~a~.nm~ ~.~~~man n.~~i~~~n o a, o a. ~ 2 ~ a ~ ~ o ~, ~ ~. N N C Q -o 'o -~ -~ ° n o ~ Zo ~ ~o Zo e~ en ° ~, ° ~ ~ Q ~ o ~ e ~ c ~ ~ o o a- s ~ ~ ° ° ~ ° ~ a o' o ~ S Q ~ o a a ~~ ~~ $ ~vvn~ ~~s~°ss ~ ~~ a - - a - $ 3 -'_l~ ~ -3 ~ - ~ o ~ ~~ ~3 3 ~ ~' S ° o ~ ~ ° ° Z ~~'~, $ ~ 3 ~ ~ 3 ~ ~ ~ 3, 3 S° ~~ii~~~~ ~ ~ ~ { ~~ Q ~ ,. {~ ~ ~ I I ( { IIII IIII~ ~ I O ~ O -1 -1 -1 -1 ~ t~t p -o 'v -o 'o ~ ~ w y 'v p ~ 'o = ; ~ m ~ s ~ ~~ ~~~ ~.° ~-a ~~ ~ ~~~ a ~'a ~ o a o Z ~. F~ ° O ~ O O -i Z ~ ~ O ~ a ~ ~ Q N * ~ O C G' ~ ~ ~?° a ~$°~~$ m ~~e S° ~~ 3c~~ ~ ~sx ~~ o' ? Q ~ ~ f o '-' s s ~~ o 0 o s ~ -e o - g O o 0 0 o c~ °~ a ~ °~ o~ o s~= s~~ ° _ O~ c~ o~= o o ~~ ~ e ~° a e Q ~° o° o a o' u v o a. o ~ ~ °- °c ~ o y ° ~ o a ~ C ~ tq ~ c .: o o it ~ w ~ r.*. ~ N N C a m _`mL~ m I Q T ~ I I I I I I I I I I u .. .. m I , I I i ,--. I ~ I i I N ~ gg a4~ ~.a-~-~-. ~ a~ ~~> ado ~ a~ a~~ g.s ~ a, ., ~ S N - - s H n C: ~ f1 ° H ~^ m o' s FCe C ~ ° V• m M N ~ s "' I m I I I x I ' I I I I ~ I ~ I ~ , ~ I r I ; I n 0 z rn Z O Z D r z rn rn N W r to ~. ~f ~~ h ~~ ~ ~ c~ a r-~ F~ ®~ ~~ ®~ ~~ ~ ~ rn •-- o .o p ~ " c ~ 2 ~ aat ~ ~ ~ ~• H ~ "' ~QD u~ ~' o' 13-M \ AR- 0 0~ 11:37 \64088 r: r oa ua ro _sum.dgn 6/21/00 r ~ r r ~ O T; ~~ ~ ~~ + + + ~ @ ~~ O w w - ~ 0 0 1 - ~ ~p u+ s S ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ +~ ~ f IoGL7IOfI arxr dt cy W ~ w m a t ~ > p 6 ~ ~ ~ A 1~ Li N N - - 111OIA F > ~ 51MlCIUIE NO. ~ ~ N TO N w N a N N [ ~ # D W QI + O + O u ~ ~ ~ ~ $ ~ ~ ~ N ~ N TOf BEVATIDN ~ ~ A ~ IN W W ~ ~~ 8~ i p O 2 ~ f~ ~ ~ ~ ~ C ~ ~ Sj ' ~ a_ w ~ O DNHI BNATgN M ~ •• ~ ~ •• 7 { •• p •' ~ { ~ { ~ ~ ~ 4 C n r O p a w NVBR ENA7ION our ~ ~ IIAR QII1[Y~L T W pt Q1 i ~} ~ K O N to O ~ ~ O N I fV U7 W v (JI g L 4 U P a ~ N 0 O ~ ~~~eee ~ ~ n ~ r ~~ ~ s N N '~ O A6~ Z O a .061 4 ~ ~ Y y N N _ ` } } '3 g + + Y r : ~ ~ + ; S ~ w i S 'v ~ i ~~ i i H o g g~ ~ d7f ~ ~~ C W ~ ,~ ~ ~ ~ ~ '~ ~ .~ ~ ~ s~~~ ~ ~ r ~ ~~ ~ ~ _ _ _ ~ ~ ~ Ir any o.A,+ ~ ~ ~, ~ ~ -J N In U1 ~ ~ d d tA• SU! DRASi Re ~ ~ :V ~ ~ RGf. LJI 333 2 ~~~ 0 0 8~ ~, ~ ~ y~ ~//~J, ~.» N ~ ~ N - - r9l GdL p 11i1U aA'I fot aANK.! ~ `~--9 N tJ~i SIYICItIIi YYY 60 n~a! 70.V > ~ ~ ~ IOTAL Lf. lOR MY OIMWIif! S/1NL ~ ODL f ~ X,O A!D ASDYE ~ A + D~ 7C O01.'a') • N N 8 u.SID. NOm oa sro.NO~ !~ a w+ 1 `~J o ~ ~ a ~ c a ~ ~ ~o~ ~ ~ a o n ~ A C O ~ ~ "~ O ~ ~~~ ~ ~ ( ~ O ~ \ L l as O ~ ID 7 a - - - - -v ao ;;~ ~ w. sID. Neu at sID. Nas ~ ~r + to O ~ aL rarAL~ a rraAta srtr. Nau ~ Q®~ N n n MD.l1TIE •A• SID. N0.17 OR Na=t V ~/~ ~ ~ O a - - - - ~ MD.L itrE T SID. SIOi.A Ot NQ27 ~ f ~~ MD.L TIfE •D• SID. N0.1f Oa a~tl '~ ALDl I#11ME WITH QRA7E SID. NOIt ~-{ MAL Fa11ME YAIH IIYD ORAl6 SDl ND.ti S µn I PLS~ RAAI! 1Y1111 GNi! SID. N0.24 M.Dl l-la) AI1ME VIIM 7YiD OUTS S1D. Na2t iR SID aw~I oS aw a . . `~ 7' N - - ALD.L DLSJ IWA! 1MID1 lrl'O tiATa SID. aazf t Y N - - T.aDl SID. amss € O ~L = ~S - LL tl ~t¢ 0 d aoeLSlm awwa flD.a s~ 3 cavc oaua n •r cr. sm aan oollc a eea er.e wr, cr. sm. aan a a u u-trr. rrre aww } M ~~ ~ ~~~ ~ ~ Q O ~ TI ~ 1 ~7 __ u F t + M o 1 g 1 r ~ 13 ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~~ iC . . >R t ~ n O t7 v m~ Q a O m m ~~ D I Z G a~ ~~ .~T ~T ~ +~! ++ ~+ 191 ~~ r~ a~ -/y 4088_rdy_p~h4.dgn \~,r ,,~.`6 9 1~~ `\ k , ~ ,~ h ~e L:, i +: I + ~ ~~ J ~ ~4a ~ 1 ~ ~ ~ ~ 4 A~rrD; ~ ~ mgr- 1F 1 v~~~ !, ~ p / n'.tpf's n ~~ O ''~ / tngNN Yu i '~ ~ N ° 9s~~C a A ~I 1F V ~ y t/GI <~ ~ ~ f ~ 7•_ ~ mm A~~~ hwil~ C 1-A-1 ~~~~ i ~." ~ ~ h ~' ~ ~h9~ $pN `~ ~~r h ~~ ~ , ti~ ~~ aR wow °~.$$ ~ ~ M ~~ ~~_~ ~~ ~ g~.. -= i- .SY'S6~ Y9~ . ~ ~~ r i J V A ~NI L AP N. ~N ~~r. ~~ y. >~ Cv~ • ~ \~ ,~S N ~/ ~~s'a ,, `/6 0 Q ~ a . ~i i;~i . ~stos ~ i i ~ ~ I II I~ III yp a 10~ I i.SZ.BSS ~ 1 ~ II I III L_ ~ I III Q~ _ ~,~ !II i II o~ . I u III • Q III4•-.vl III I~ I ~ III I ^a~'~ ~ . ~ I I II I I ^ ~~ ~y I '' I I ~ ~ I VII 1 II111 .Ij`® ~~~ ~~y` Y-ru y ~~ .~' '~ P~ pp i°/ =a~ h ~~ d ~ ~ I / ~ fi iii ~ ~ • ~r; ~ i S ,~ ~~N / + ~ £ sn ~I ~ * \ `,~~ ~ µ `~ ~ ~ I £ i. ( w h fi ~ 'F ~ _I ~ I ~ i k ~~ ~ ` ~ 1 ;r , I I II ~ III .. tl II . II I . I I 'I I .I .~ II I : l 1 1 1 • -9 Od • iSR 60 I xn t~'83R~dS 3MOH~ 11d3S0(' M.LLI0.29N ./1'9fd • H V ~ ~ ~ ~•~/ ~ _ I ,'~/ ....~ ~ ~, y~ ~ ~ 1 ~ I ~ ~ ~ µ I I P Z ,~ I ~ I ~I ~ ~ ~ i ~ I I ~I~ oa! * w A ~ +~ o ~ z fi ~ I I ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ $ ~ ~ , I ~ ~ ~ I 'I fi I ~ 1 ~ ~ I ` h - ~'~ '~ £ £ I I q rn 1F I ~I y'~~~ ~Y:°~ m ~ h I p~ ~ ~E ~$~ ~~~ aa: ~~T M I I ~ ~ h ~ I Y I JI M V 6a Ily I 'I 1 ~ sp ~ 1F '~?LL h ~ , h r sBf I ~~ II ~ .iI ~ ~ 2 ,~ ~ ~~~ Qs I ~ 4 ~ h .S ~~ ~~ C I :~ I~ h N~ .~ ~ I ~ I~~ I :' h I I Z I I I M I~ '~ ~ * ~ I ~ I 6 I I II `,I w ~ ~ I $~g~ B I I '~~ x15.00 fi~ x, ~ a~3 I i I ~ A 1= ~ ~ h ~~ ~ I as I ti ~ ~ 25 - -e >, I~v . ~ ,~ i fi / / ~ s ~e_/ ~ n~,y . III '' ~ ~ $~ I II I ~ ~ d ~ II I I I~ 1 . ~ 6 III ~11 5~~1 I I ~1 I a~ Q I!~~` , ~~ ~~~ ~ ~~~ ~~~ y9 q a~ ~~ ~ ~. T ,: ~ ~- ~~ a ~. 8~~ g ~~ ' ~~ p ~ -~ ~m a 6 rtl J ~ J ~ ID -.~ N + + ,~ ;, 0 ~_ ~.~~ \ $ ~~ ~\ \~~ `~~ ~~~ \ I~`~ \~~ ~", `~~ ~` \~ \~~ \ ~~~\ 0 0 ~p ...,~p8~ a I I ~ z m C '~-~ Q rn Ctrl ~~ H ~y O m O ~NI y ~ ~ ~ ~ yoZ { r~l - ~ m ~ °O y c ~- ~ C ~~ ~ $ a ~ ~v .0 Opp r m ~ ~ ~ r m mN "i $g m~ „o n ~ N ~ * ~ ~A ~ o Nm ~~~ r ~~D m 5 ? mo g ~ ~ N~ ~~ ~~~~~oDv u n n l l n ~,`+~bq°Q~?, ~'i H ~~a~~oD~ 1 1 1 II , N p v,cn ~w ~i"+ ~ ~ ~ j~~ ' ~~ y N~ a0, a~ 7/99 $~ ~~ ~~ t" ~~ ~ ~z ~~ ~ ~ ,~ r ~y A