20181218 Ver 2_PCN Form Submission_20200225

DWR
mrislon Of Water Re ..l
Pre -Construction Notification (PCN) Form
September 29, 2018 Ver 3
Initial Review
Has this project met the requirements for acceptance in to the review process?*
r Yes
r No
Is this project a public transportation project?*
r Yes r No
Change only if needed.
BIMS # Assigned
20181218
Is a payment required for this project?*
r No payment required
r Fee received
r Fee needed - send electronic notification
Reviewing Office*
Mooresville Regional Office - [phone]
Information for Initial Review
1a. Name of project:
Farmington Commercial Development - Phase 1
1a. Who is the Primary Contact?*
Daniel Kuefler
1b. Primary Contact Email:*
daniel. kuefler@wetlands-epg. com
Date Submitted
2/25/2020
Nearest Body of Water
Fuda Creek
Basin
Yadkin-PeeDee
Water Classification
C
Site Coordinates
Latitude: Longitude:
35.2870-80.6728
A. Processing Information
County (or Counties) where the project is located:
Cabarrus
Mecklenburg
Is this project a public transportation project?*
r Yes r No
1a. Type(s) of approval sought from the Corps:
V Section 404 Permit (wetlands, streams and waters, Clean Water Act)
r- Section 10 Permit (navigable waters, tidal waters, Rivers and Harbors Act)
1 b. What type(s) of permit(s) do you wish to seek authorization?
Version#*
2
What amout is owed?*
B $240.00
r $570.00
Select Project Reviewer*
Nan Johnson:eads\adjohnson1
1c. Primary Contact Phone:*
[phone]

* Nationwide Permit (NWP)
r Regional General Permit (RGP)
F Standard (IP)
1c. Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps?
r Yes r No
Nationwide Permit (NWP) Number:
Nationwide Permit (NWP) Number:
Nationwide Permit (NWP) Number:
NWP Numbers (for multiple NWPS):
1d. Type(s) of approval sought from the DWR:
W 401 Water Quality Certification - Regular
r Non-404 Jurisdictional General Permit
r Individual Permit
18 - Minor Discharges
29 - Residential Developments
39 - Commercial/Institutional Developments
le. Is this notification solelyfor the record because written approval is not required?
For the record onlyfor DWR 401 Certification:
For the record onlyfor Corps Permit:
r 401 Water Quality Certification - E)press
r Riparian Buffer Authorization
1f. Is this an after -the -fact permit application?*
r Yes r No
1g. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for mitigation of impacts?
r Yes r No
1g. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for mitigation of impacts?
(- Yes r No
Acceptance Letter Attachment
1h. Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties?
r Yes r No
1j. Is the project located in a designated trout watershed?
r Yes r No
B. Applicant Information
1d. Who is applying for the permit?
W Owner ❑ Applicant (other than owner)
le. Is there an Agent/Consultant for this project?*
r Yes r No
2. Owner Information
2a. Name(s) on recorded deed:
Rocky River Rd Associates, LLC
2b. Deed book and page no.:
24792-354,8789-255
2c. Responsible party:
James E. Merrifield
2d.Address
Street Address
2400 South Boulevard #300
Address Line 2
city
Charlotte
Fbstal / Zip Code
28203
2e. Telephone Number:
[phone]
2g. Email Address:*
[e-mail]
State / Rwinoe / legion
NC
Country
USA
2f. Fax Number:
r Yes r No
r Yes r No

4. Agent/Consultant (if applicable)
4a. Name:
Daniel Kuefler
4b. Business Name:
Wetlands & Environmental Planning Group
4c.Address
Street Address
10612-D Providence Road
Address Line 2
aty
Charlotte
Postal / Zip Code
28227
4d. Telephone Number:
[phone]
4f. Email Address:*
heath.caldvvell@v,etiands-epg.com
Agent Authorization Letter*
agent auth _duplicate.pdf
C. Project Information and Prior Project History
1. Project Information
1b. Subdivision name:
(if appropriate)
1c. Nearest municipality/ town:
Charlotte
2. Project Identification
2a. Property Identification Number:
10536101,5506141031
State / Province / Region
NC
Caudry
USA
4e. Fax Number:
2b. Property size:
152.2
2c. Project Address
Street Address
Located on the north side of Rocky River Road and adjacent to the east side of 1-485.
Address Line 2
City Sate / Province / Region
Charlotte NC
Postal / Zip Code Country
3. Surface Waters
3a. Name of the nearest body of water to proposed project:*
Fuda Creek
3b. Water Resources Classification of nearest receiving water:*
C
3c. What river basin(s) is your project located in?*
Yadkin-PeeDee
94.43KB
3d. Please provide the 12-digit HUC in which the project is located.
030401050301
4. Project Description and History
4a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinityof the project at the time of this application:*
The site consists primarily of vacant cleared fields with scattered forested areas. General land use in the vicinity consists of light commercial
development, residential development, and agricultural use.
4b. Have Corps permits or DWR certifications been obtained for this project (including all prior phases) in the past?*
r Yes r No r Unknown
4c. If yes, please give the DWR Certification number or the Corps Action ID (exp. SAW-0000-00000)

SAW-2018-01705. Based on our previous discussions regarding the logistics associated with phased mitigation, the
application is being resubmitted in multiple phases. Phase 1 is presented here and includes
impacts associated rough grading, BMP construction and utility installation. A followup
submittal for Phase 2 will include impacts associated with road crossings specifically associated
with the mixed -use development, and also an additional PCN will be submitted for an
onsite/offsite sewer connection.
Project History Upload
4d. Attach an 8 1/2 X 11 excerpt from the most recent version of the USGS topographic map indicating the location of the project site. (for DWR)
usgs _duplicate.pdf 119.68KB
4e. Attach an 8 1/2 X 11 excerpt from the most recent version of the published County NRCS Soil Survey map depicting the project site. (for DWR)
soils _duplicate.pdf 188.28KB
4f. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property:
1.59
4g. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams on the property:
6937
4h. Explain the purpose of the proposed project:*
The project consists of grading, fill, utility crossings & BMPs for a mixed -use development.
4i. Describe the overall project in detail, including indirect impacts and the type of equipment to be used:*
Excavation and grading of the site will use standard equipment - excavator, dump trucks, track hoe, etc.
4j. Please upload project drawings for the proposed project.
plans _duplicate.pdf 6.29MB
5. Jurisdictional Determinations
5a. Have the wetlands or streams been delineated on the property or proposed impact areas?*
r Yes r No r Unknown
Comments:
5b. If the Corps made a jurisdictional determination, what type of determination was made?*
G Preliminary r Approved r Not Verified r Unknown r N/A
Corps AID Number:
SAW-2014-01152
5c. If 5a is yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas?
Name (if known): Nic Nelson
Agency/Consultant Company: WEPG
Other:
5d. List the dates of the Corp jurisdiction determination or State determination if a determination was made by the Corps or DWR
These features were field -verified by William Elliot (USACE) and a preliminary
jurisdictional determination was approved on August 28th, 2015 (SAW-2014-01152). Please
refer to the Jurisdictional Determination section for information on onsite surface waters.
5d1. Jurisdictional determination upload
delineation _duplicate.pdf 365.9KB
6. Future Project Plans
6a. Is this a phased project? *
r Yes r No
7b. If yes, explain.
A nationwide permit for this project has been previously approved. However, based on our previous discussions with the USACE (Catherine Janiczak) regarding the logistics associated
with phased mitigation, the application is being resubmitted in multiple phases.
Phase 1 is presented here and includes
impacts associated rough grading, BMP construction and utility installation. A followup
submittal for Phase 2 will include impacts associated with road crossings specifically associated
with the mixed -use development, and also an additional PCN will be submitted for an
onsite/offsite sewer connection.
Are any other NWP(s), regional general permit(s), or individual permits(s) used, or intended to be used, to authorize any part of the proposed project or related activity?
No.
D. Proposed Impacts Inventory

1. Impacts Summary
1a. Where are the impacts associated with your project? (check all that apply):
W Wetlands W Streams -tributaries
F Open Waters r Pond Construction
2. Wetland Impacts
r Buffers
2a1 Reason(?)
2b. Impact type * (?)
2c. Type of W.*
2d. W. name *
2e. Forested*
2f. Type of
Impact
Jurisdicition*(?)]2g.
area*
W1
Fill
P
Bottomland Hardwood Forest
Wetand 00
Yes
Corps
0.017
W2
Fill
P
ff-mland Hardwood Forest
Wetlands WE/WB/A/B
Yes
Corps
0.054
W3
Fill
P
Bottomland Hardwood Forest
Wetland MM
Yes
Corps 14LI
2g. Total Temporary Wetland Impact
0.000
2g. Total Wetland Impact
0.075
2h. Comments:
W1 Impacts include Wetland 00 (0.017 ac) for BMP fill under NWP 18.
W2 Impacts include wetlands WE/WB/A/B (0.054 ac) for commercial grading/fill under NWP 39.
W3 Impacts include Wetland MM (0.004) ac for BMP grading under MNP 18.
3. Stream Impacts
2g. Total Permanent Wetland Impact
0.075
3a. Reason for impact (?) 3b.lmpact type * 3c. Type of impact* �3�name* ��3e. Stream Type * 3f. Type of 3g. S. width * 3h. Impact
(?) Jurisdiction* length*
S1
Sewer Installation
Tem orar
P Y
Excavation
Stream K
Perennial
Corps
P
6
Average (fed)
20
(linearfed)
S2
BMP grading
9 9
Permanent
Fill
Stream NN
Interrrdttent
Corps
P
4
Average (feet)
46
(linearfed)
3i. Total jurisdictional ditch impact in square feet:
0
3i. Total permanent stream impacts:
46
3i. Total stream and ditch impacts:
66
3i. Total temporary stream impacts:
20
3j. Comments:
Temporary Stream Impacts noted above are due to sewer line crossings that are not feasible by directional boring
S1 Impacts include Stream K (20 LF) for sanitary sewer installation under NWP 29.
S2 Impacts include Stream NN (46.2 If / 0.004 ac) for BMP construction under NWP 18.
E. Impact Justification and Mitigation U
1. Avoidance and Minimization
1a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing the project:
Due to the location of the numerous on site streams and wetlands, opportunities to avoid these areas were limited. Impacts to site surface waters
associated with the proposed development were limited through site selection location, design, location/orientation of the proposed lots, associated
parking areas and access routes. Please refer to cover letter for additional details regarding specific avoidance and minimization measures.
1b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques:
Construction techniques will implement approved erosion control methods to avoid/minimize impacts to onsite/adjacent offsite receiving conveyances.
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State?
r Yes r No
2b. If this project DOES NOT require Compensatory Mitigation, explain why:

F. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWR)
1. Diffuse Flow Plan
1a. Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
r Yes r No
If no, explain why:
2. Stormwater Management Plan
2a. Is this a NCDOT project subject to compliance with NCDOT's Individual NPDES permit NCS000250?
r Yes r No
2b. Does this project meet the requirements for low density projects as defined in 15ANCAC 02H .1003(2)?
r Yes r No
2c. Does this project have a stormwater management plan (SMP) reviewed and approved under a state stormwater program or state -approved local government stormwater
program?
r Yes r No
2d. Which of the following stormwater management program(s) apply:
V Local Government r- State
Local Government Stormwater Programs
17 Phase II r NSW r USMP r- Water Supply
Please identify which local government stormwater program you are using.
Mecklenburg County / Town of Harrisburg
Comments:
Storm water on the site will be handled by facilities shown on the attached plans. The stormwater plan will be reviewed by both Mecklenburg County
and the Town of Harrisburg. The stormwater plan has not yet been submitted to /approved by Meckenburg County and the Town of Harrisburg but it
has been designed to meet both their criteria.
G. Supplementary Information
1. Environmental Documentation
1a. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the use of public (federal/state) land?*
r Yes r No
2. Violations (DWR Requirement)
2a. Is the site in violation of DWR Water Quality Certification Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), or DWR Surface Water or Wetland Standards or
Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)?*
r Yes r No
3. Cumulative Impacts (DWR Requirement)
3a. Will this project result in additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?*
r Yes r No
3b. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
4. Sewage Disposal (DWR Requirement)
4a. Is sewage disposal required by DWR for this project?*
r Yes r Nor WA
4b. Describe, in detail, the treatment methods and dispositions (non -discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from the proposed project. If the wastewater will be treated
at a treatment plant, list the capacity available at that plant.
Wastewater generated on the site will be transported to the nearest treatment facility via sewer lines.
5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or habitat?*
r Yes r No
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act impacts?*
r Yes r No

5d. Is another Federal agency involved?*
r Yes r No r Unknown
5e. Is this a DOT project located within Division's 1-8?
r Yes r No
5f. Will you cut any trees in order to conduct the work in waters of the U.S.?
r Yes r No
5g. Does this project involve bridge maintenance or removal?
r Yes r No
5h. Does this project involve the construction/installation of a wind turbine(s)?*
r Yes r No
Si. Does this project involve (1) blasting, and/or (2) other percussive activities that will be conducted by machines, such as jackhammers, mechanized pile drivers, etc.?
r Yes r No
5j. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical Habitat?
A threatened/Endangered species assessment was conducted in which no species were identified. Habitat does exist for the Northern Long Eared Bat
but the project is exempt as noted in the included T&E report.
Consultation Documentation Upload
T&E _duplicate.pdf 259.04KB
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as an Essential Fish Habitat?*
f Yes r No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact an Essential Fish Habitat?*
No essential fish habitat in this region.
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation status?*
r Yes r No
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?*
SHPO's website: http://gis.ncder.gov/hpoweb/
7c. Historic or Prehistoric Information Upload
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA-designated 100-yearfloodplain?*
r Yes r No
8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMArequirements:
No fill / grading Will occur within the floodplain as part of the proposed project
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination?*
http://polaris3g.mecklenburgcountync.gov ; https://gis.cabarruscounty.us/mycabarrusgis/
Miscellaneous
Comments
A compiled PCN package is included here, including updated cover letter, ORM, plans, maps, photos, JD approval, and other supporting documentation.
Miscellaneous attachments not previously requested.
Farmington Development Updated PCN Compiled _022520.pdf
Signature
*
V By checking the box and signing below, I certify that:
8.29MB
• I have given true, accurate, and complete information on this form;
I agree that submission of this PCN form is a "transaction" subject to Chapter 66, Article 40 of the NC General Statutes (the "Uniform Electronic Transactions Act");
• I agree to conduct this transaction by electronic means pursuant to Chapter 66, Article 40 of the NC General Statutes (the "Uniform Electronic Transactions Act");
I understand that an electronic signature has the same legal effect and can be enforced in the same way as a written signature; AND
• I intend to electronically sign and submit the PCN form.
Full Name:
Daniel Kuefler
Signature

Date
2/25/2020

1Ne*'.-A-Os T = rtr,1 f twit e� r 1 r nirt C>. csup
Agent Authorization Letter
Loor-=rd Rindn,�r. C'LLC.
The purpose of this form is to authorize our firm to act on your behalf in matters related to aquatic
resource (i.e. stream/wetlands) identification/mapping and regulatory permitting. The
undersigned, who are either registered property owners or legally authorized to conduct due
diligence activities on the property as identified below, do hereby authorize associates of
Leonard S. Rindner, PLLC, Wetlands and Environmental Planning Group (WEPG) to act on my
behalf and take all actions necessary for the processing, issuance, and acceptance of applicable
permit(s) and/or certification(s).
Project/Site Name: Farmington
Property Address: 152.2-acres north of Rocky River Road and adjacent to the east side of I-485.
Parcel Identification Number (PIN): 10536101 (Mecklenburg) and 55061407290000 (Cabarrus)
Select one: I am other
Name: James E. Merrifield
Company: MPV Properties
Mailing Address: 2400 South Boulevard #300, Charlotte, NC 28203
Telephone Number: 704-561-5241
Electronic Mail Address: [e-mail]
%©
* The lbterested Buyer/Other acknowledges that an agreement and/or formal contract to purchase and/or conduct
due diligence activities exists between the current property owner and the signatory of this authorization in cases
where the property is not owned by the signatory.
cC ,: okl'�: OfiicC" +.-rwv ,wot€Ands,-�a?xim
&he v lle Office:
10612Pi? Rd.
1070 Tut,s?e:C Rd,, B:dy;, C
Pma 5 o
pp FMB
�ti l�e* C V. i� �4i &6i�
28
q
C r=rCe:tcW: WC 282'17
:'dt vile, NC 2880
(70-1) 90,, .2277

1
U
figure No. LEONARD S. RINDNERPLLC FARMINGTON
4 Wetlands & Environmental Planning Group Mecklenburg Co. / Cabarrus Co.
3714 Spokeshave Lane
Matthews, NC 28105 SOIL MANUSCRIPT
(704) 904 — 2277 MAP
[e-mail] *Approximate Boundary
CIm ;
Sheet: I Page:
Drawn Reviewed
by: NRN by: LSR
Date:
6-u-tz

{stir. r- — :w I •-_ -. -
IL
� �,� ray _ •—•y 1 5�.• — � - _ •. ,
SITE f f
¢fi
-��— f � �_''�� .�— M1 4 ALL "-� . .� � _ — � 1 7•'•- s �_j
7.
If I
F I�5~� I •fix 5 r 1 I' x L , I.t• �ti•_ t
USGS QUAD
LOCATION Harrisburg (NC) 1
Lat: 35:2888 ON HUC: 03040105 SCALE
Lon 80 67.74 °W Rocky River
g 1:24,000 Iq1i VIM
1 N
LEONARD S. RINDNERPLLC
FARMINGTON
sheet:
Page:
Figure No.
wetlands & Environmental Planning Group
Mecklenburg Co. / Cabarrus Co.
Drawn
Reviewed
3
3714 Spokeshave Lane
by:NRN
by: LSR
Matthews, NC 28105
(704) 904 — 2277
[e-mail]*Approximate
jJSGS MAP
Bound rY
Date:
5-6-13

0
W
C
J
�3 0
o <y
>
O
-p
V
z c a 'E
Q c�
z
z -
O
a
Q
Qp gir
Y
00
�a
00
Z
;cD
LL
o
(�:=M L L
oa�co
z>o
Qof�ziw
S
�3a MF
o
a
3
z
O
0.
0.
J
Z
J
z
Q
zz
...• r W
W
N
O
Q
LU
LU
fN
to
to
m ZQO
0. z000.
U OHZ ?�
O Q ~OgLU
0'
a o g !L, W
0
W W q
fN
U I \
g ` z
F
W gLU
IT
g_
W

1
WETLAND
i 1--,_-WEILAND
PEREMIAL RPW PERENNIAL FM
STREAM S STREAM K SEASONAL RPW JJ
111 INPeRewIAAt_ RPw.. y I
STREAM N 5EASONAL RPW SEASONAL RPW II
SEASONAL RPW STREAM BS
STREAM %\ P ❑ WE LAND EE I SEASONAL RPW
� D WETLAND CC STREAM LL
'I'h ti
WETLAND WETLAND R WETLAND AA
SEASONAL RPWI WETLAND Z SEASONAL RAW
STREAM M 11 WETLAN7] STREAM W
11 11 PERENNIAL RF'W r r SEASONAL RPW
STREAM K STREAM V
,11 11 a
PERENNIAL RPw
PERB HAL RPW / PEREMIIAL RPW WETLAND u STREAM KK
11 11 WETLAND I j
x (J HROOKDALE
11 11 WETLAND A NOW OR FORMERLY
ROCKY RIVER ROAD ASSOCIATES LLC
WETLAM
LDR- 8987-0255
WETLAND J WETLAND F� WF' PIN 5506I40729
1 11 11 WETLAND
11 11 1 WETLANv oa
,PERENNIAL WETLAND WE
11 STREAM D WETLAND WEI l A
11 11 l
11 11 I -AND WETLAND B
11 11 INTERMffTENT
11 INWETLAND A ' FM NN
11611
NOW OR FORMERLY
ROCKY RIVER ROAD ASSOCIATES LLCl
11 '' DR 24792-354
PIN 105-361-D1 WETLAND MM
1 11 11 � FAi#fd4T0iV RDC+E PAFitWAY
11 11 EXETM THOROUOFFARE
11 11 �
11 11
1 1, 11 11
� 11 11
- - - ---------------------
SHEET TITLE SAW-
EXISTING SITE CONDITIONS '"-50°'
TE
12/07/17
PROJECT DTG r
FARMINGTON MAH r
CRAB ORc:Kq0 TWSP, MECK. CO, NC
Soo a 250 Soo 1000 FOR. ROOK' RIVER ROAD ASSOCIATES LLC
iaft I Tae.
Planning o Krveying o Hxsinscrlxs Figure
p
GRAPHIC SCALE nc ca ..ee �. North rrw` .. am �e. 11-w C—ILM 2KS4 v
IN FEET ) / !!on -G1m 7N4.MeAW 704.eea.oao la)

a•
PHASE 2
MPACT
1 7
PHASE,
_ = f LIPAC
PHASE I.
WACr
PAC
NOW OR. FORM
_ R CKY RIVER f
D13, 2479 354
1 1 PIN 105-3 -01 �s'r�•y? r ' 1
t
FAFAMWON FIDGE,EPA AY
BOMM MIT mr
500 0 250 500 1000
GRAPHIC SCALE
( IN FEET )

d PROP08ED EENF3i CF OSMOG
' 0 TSFORARY STREAM WACT
BEE DETAL r
i
11 1� 1 '� .Y{�" tip: BMP
WETLAND UPACr
w1 SM bETFL'C 11
SHEET 4OF7
is
ty,,
�.. PLC
E
P F40
111 11 1 7
�
R�oroeeF- WAD cTaaeeNw `�� � ` / r . ! • 11
WETLAND UPACr
SEE DETAL 'D' \ f 11
aF�r 6 OF 7,
J I • Y
NQW 11 6k- Fri k PFK POB® BW
1 1' CKr RIVER 1 WETLAND AND BIREMI WAGT
'D'B 2479 354 �' SEE DETAIL
l 1 1 PIN 105-3 -01 SHEET 7 OF 7
I 1 xry FAR IANaTON FILE PARKWAY
i s F EXISTNA THOROWWARE
f ,
11 11 -
� Q�
r
11
SHEET TITLE "W_
OVERVIEW OF IMPACTS =500'
12/08 /17
MAW TT —
PROJECT BTG
/FARMINGTON MAH V
son 0 250 500 1000 FOR ROCKY RNER ROAD ASSOCIATES LLC
Ypla"t ms 0 sor1itylas8 ar NoTnas, Ii¢c. Figure
r[annrnr a Sr►veylaj o 8srrar.rlsj 10
zvii.d— a.& t—t o. r :.a
GRAPHIC SCALE ca.KotW. Rorte CMULn Mn PtmwMK xata c. U.
( IN FEET ) ffAdfftrmU= c-oars 704aobAM "4.Mt.oea fug

I
r
WE7LANd "04"
II
-rr, r
w
w
\
I 1
17,iii=lL
\
r 111
w w
,' y
� 'lllfi ��i_ I
�
- 1
li .Ti
/
WETLAND "00"
.of
IMPACT: 741 SF
w w w w W w
W w
i
1
�•► A
4UNUT, A 0
\
- 0 L.F. STREAM IMPACT
�OD 0.017 AC WETLAND IMPACT
50 0 25 50 100
GRAPHIC SCALE
SHEET TITLE mW_
WETLAND IMPACT
DETAIL 'OV
PROJECT
FARMINGTON
TWSP f I TOWN OF HARMIK CA9AFi M CO, NC
FOR: ROCKY WIM ROAD MOOMMS LLC
YAasaoucx-m«• •■u� � Hausa, Wc.
Pls>Ksls= n Srrderd>Kf � 8>K IrMr.ri>Mr
�o`�im.,r atr Cav! Fa. A� ucn
xc ay.�,,.ta ca.asw.. aase c.:am� Ai�P9 r!¢.r�s, ac�rh Gr.uoti Amu
�,�-gym ao�neeswc aoaen�r
gure
11

+
STREAM "C"
}
W ti
WETLAND "WE"
r
r �
WETLAND "WE"
BM
_ L '
IMPACT. 383 SF
�QO �1
,
TREE SAVE/STREAM
+
1 ; BUFFER
r
�+
1 '
WETLAND "A"
SPLITTER BOX
\
r
WETLAND "WB"
IMPACT: 49 SF
r'
WETLAND "C"
IMPACT: 401 SF
�
r
i
70
WETLAND "A"
IMPACT: 1,249
SF
rr
"B"
WETLAND
IMPACT: 287 SF
1
1 �
�
�
w +
7O6
1
ti
1
0 L.F. STREAM IMPACT
�1
SHEET
0.054 AC WETLAND IMPACT
TITLE
WETLAND
DETAIL
IMPACT
"D"
1"=50,
so 0 25 s0
100
12/08/17
PROJECT
FARMINGTON
CRAB ORMW
FORROCKY
TVW, NECK 00, NG
RIVER ROAD LLC
8TG
5MOWN
AH
- Houma, rya.
YPlansi
Figure
xc cmyamt,
g a ylass�
Prrrslaj o srrrryir= o x,�� r...rfEl,
� �• b&V ems, urn Cud" Emx
12
GRAPHIC SCALE
( IN F`EEr
uo„ Of sn.aee,aoo mieedomm(L.1
s

J r J � } I �p�, �� ■ r J
/ I+U'1'URI;, r1"AlUll1VC�I'ON RIDGIN PARKWAY ■—■ ¢ �r ■— rl r r 'll10RO UC.I II -ARl-, BY0,111I',1ZS �— r
r
!J rr r/ r! rrr � — � � r- r� � rrrr�•.
/r t / r � — r r • err �_�
/ r /IF
r ! r � !/ rr ■ — �� yyr � ��
r r EX. TOP OF STREAM BANK. / ■ r STREAM
r
I � � r-
- r �
_ 1 STREAM K;
TEMPORARY-----��■rr
■ ! !/ /. \ J IMPACr: 20 L.F. -'
V.
r r r
r r
r-
r
' 1 ,. !J /t rr I■-1 '` 1 rrr ram.
--
t
-�-
1
rr �; / � I ' ! + �' 1 � /,'¢ /' rrr /•' � � r
141RhIING'!'{]N RiDGI? I'ARKWAY .—
I
ri 1 II 1 1 II I Il ol'osr'.D 17IUROUGIH�A1tIi !r
r ! I 1 r
. •/ ,yam �-. 1 I .' �r / / J f /J
/ ! J
r / ! , 1 / r I ! r♦
20 L.F. TEMPORARY STREAM IMPACT
APKSHEET TITLE SAW_ _ _
WETLAND IMPACT =50-
DETAIL "I" 12/07/17
PRIIJECTFARMINGTON RIDGE PARKWAY BTc
aka PLAZA ROAD EXTENSION) MAH
TWV # 1, TOWN OF HARMURQ CABAMM oo, NC
50 q 25 50 100 FM THE TOWN OF HAS
Yae -W s a Hou$, ic. Figure
P1xxmisig o Sarvaylso; o BoIxex
p�x 13
GRAPHIC SCALE xc ca po..e. cn,riou., Nash c.romu. Mrs PW.,x., xwh c.Vilm mE34
( IN FEET ) 70"wim 7o►, mome(w

1
1
r
1 �
r � �
I_'.11
':wz'3e
.,atk`';'E{
INTERMITTENT RPW "NN"
fMPACT: A6 40 LF
/
f
�
I
WETLAND "MM"
INTERMITTENT
IMPACT: 182 SF
RPW "NN"
- ��
WETLAND "MM"
— — - - — -
��
PROPERTY
LINE
46A8 L.F. STREAM IMPACT
- -
i
0.004 AC WETLAND IMPACT
TITLE
wftSHEET
SAW
—
WET -AND IMPACT
DETAIL AJ"
12/08/17
PROJECT
W%N By
BTC
FARMINGTON
TWr f t TOWN OF HAFNcI IR CAeAMW CO, SIC
MAH
5a 0 25 50
100
FOR ROCKY RWR ROAD AS90aATF8 LLC
Y l n ning - -W Surveying
x Houca, list
PI..�rMs � Srrreyrarx o Bx r,r...trr
Figure
14
V"ok� «1
GRAPHIC SCALE
me carpo to 0.,Wtv, xwtk cuVIEW mu
( IN F%ET)
uoa tg773

� ` 1 I � � 1111 1 1V p4lil Il 1
1k .xl, ,•.
aan x
„ x
K S:e L ' � '11
1� `ll 11
Mill' ME
I
Ca S u
���
j� dddd
ro
let
'll
rr
L
3 LO

1. UPON COMPLETION OF STREAM CROSSING WORK, CONTRACTOR SHALL BACKRI L
AND MECHANICALLY TAMP (NO SPECIFIC DENSITY) SOILS INTO PLACE AND DRESS
DISTURBED SURFACES
2. BEGINNING AT A POINT 2' ABOVE WATER SURFACE ELEVATION, GRASS DISTURBED
AREAS (SEED, FER RLIZER do STRAW MULCH) STREAM BANK, TOP OF BANK AND
DISTURBED AREAS UPLAND OF STREAM
3, INSTALL COIR FIBER NET/MAT STARTING MINIMUM 12' BELOW WATER SURFACE
ELEVATION AND EXTENDING A MINIMUM 5' BEYOND TOP OF BANK. MINIMUM
SPECIFICATIONS FOR COIR FIBER NET/MAT AS FOLLOWS,
— MIN. THICKNESS OF 0.30 INCHES
— 100% COCONUT FIBER AND WOVEN INTO THINE
— AVG- WEIGHT OF 20 OUNCES/SQ. Y➢,
4, COIR FIBER NET/MAT SHALL BE SECURELY HELD IN PLACE HITH USE OF WOODEN
STAKED AND WIRE STAPLES (AS NEEDED)
5. INSTALL LIVE STAKES BEGINNING AT WATER SURFACE ELEVATION AND EXTENDING
2 VERTICAL FEET UP THE STREAM BANK. SEE LIVE STAKE DETAIL FOR
ADDITIONAL REQUIRNENTS.
8. INSTALL SILT FENCE "RE REINFORCEMENT ALONG TOP OF BANK (ADJACENT TO
END OF COIR FIBER NET/MAT) FOR HIOTH OF DISTURBED SOILS.
WATER SURFACE ELEVATION
COIR FIBER NET/MAT
GRASS (SED, MULCH h FERTILIZE) -
REMAiNiNG DISTURBED STREAM BANK
AREAS INCLUDING TOPS OF BANK
(UNDER COIR NET/MAT)
LIVE STAKE (WILLOWS OR -
SPECIES APPROVED BY
COW/OHE.C) FOR FIRST 24-
ABOVE NORMAL WATER
SURFACE ELEVATION
12't
1, LIVE STAKES SHALL DE APPROXIMATELY 24'IN LENGTH
2. LIVE STAKES SHALL B£ 0.5'-1.5' IN DIAMETER AT THE TIME
OF PLANTING
3. LIVE STAKES SHALL BE BLACK NQLOW OR SPECIES
SPECIFIED BY COE/DHEC OR CONSULTANT
H
i. SPECIES SHALL BE DORMANT AT THE TIME OF ACQUISITION
AND PLANTING AND LOCALLY GROWN/HARVESTEO
5, LIVE STAKES SHALL BE SPACED 3' O.C.
6, LIVE STAKES SHALL BE PLANTED A MINIMUM OF 18' IN
DEPTH XITH NO MORE THAN 4'-8' OF STAKE EXPOSED
LIVE_ STAIN DETAIL
EXTEND COIR FIBER MAT
5' BEYOND TOP OF BANK
�-
EXTEND COIR FIBER NET/1dAT
W E I 12' BELOW WATER SURFACE
ELEVATION
STREAM BANK STABILIZATION - LIVE STAKE
TYPICAL DETAIL — N.T.S.
5 0 2.5 5 10
VERTICAL GRAPHIC SCALE
( IN FRET )
20 ❑ 10 20 40
I
HORIZONTAL GRAPHIC SCALE
( IN F'EEr )
INSTALL SILT FENCE
REINFORCED HITH HOC
WRE AT TOP OF BANK
(EDGE OF COIR FIBER
NET/MAT)
' ARGE ROCK (SHOT OR IMPORT]
AY BE USED TO REFORM
(REAM BANK (STACKED). 18- OF
nL SHALL COVER STREAM
DE FACE OF ROCK STACK.
ISE OF ROCK TO ANCHOR BANK
OPTIONAL)

Wetlands and Environmental Planning Group
Leonard S. Rindner, PLLC.
Threatened / Endangered / Protected Species
Evaluation
For: Farmington
Cabarrus and Mecklenburg Counties, North Carolina
By: Lisa R. Gaffney
April 26, 2018
Charlotte Office: www.wetlands-epg.com Asheville Office:
10612-D Providence Rd. 1070 Tunnel Rd., Bldg. I
PMB 550 Suite 10, PMB 283
Charlotte, NC 28277 Asheville, NC 28805
[phone]
I en. ri nd ner@wet Ian ds -epg. co nn

Farmington Site - Threatened /Endangered /Protected Species Evaluation
GENERAL LANDSCAPE DESCRIPTION:
The Farmington Site — formerly called Rocky River Road - (+/- 152.2 acres) is
located just north of Rocky River Road; and just east of Interstate 485; in
Mecklenburg and Cabarrus Counties, North Carolina. It can be found on the
Harrisburg NC USGS Topographic Quadrangle Map; latitude is 35.2909 N,
longitude is-80.6746 W. The topography is gently to moderately sloped. The
elevation ranges from 670 to 730 ft. The project is bisected by the
Cabarrus/Mecklenburg county line. (Figure 1). The site is primarily old farmland
and woodlands covered with successional old fields, old pastures, fencerows, dirt
roads, and mixed pine and hardwood forest that is disturbed throughout.
Figure 1:
ROCKV RIVER RD
Harrisburg, NC
t.EONARD S. RIKDN ER PLLC
Figure No. Wellauds& )Environmental Ph ito in Z Grou 1) ROCKY RIVER RD.
3
Irru..n Rr•ir,reJ
3714 SpokcSlravc U- Tic h'':ti111 h,: f NR
Mattimix-s, NC 2905
[phone] USGS MAP �•°
LEN.RINDNERPWS'rr.gmail.coln 'Appro\iacnc Srnindin
Wetlands and Environmental Planning Group Leonard S. Rindner, PLLC.

Farmington Site - Threatened /Endangered /Protected Species Evaluation
METHODOLOGY:
The US Fish and Wildlife Service website
https://www.fws.gov/raleigh/species/cntylist/nc counties.html was referenced to
determine the occurrence of Threatened, Endangered and Protected species for
Cabarrus and Mecklenburg Counties, North Carolina, the results of which are
listed below (Tables 1 & 2). Maps and aerial photographs were assembled, and
the site was investigated during the weeks of April 2 and April 16, 2018
Table 1: Threatened / Endangered / Protected Species listed for
Mecklenburg County
County: Mecklenburg, NC
*Source: US Fish & Wildlife Service
**Data search on April 2, 2018
Group Name Status Record Status
Invertebrate
Carolina Heelsplitter (Lasmigona
Endangered
Current
decorata
Invertebrate
Rusty -patched Bumble Bee
Endangered
Historic
(Bombus affinis)
Vascular Plants
Smooth Coneflower (Echinacea
Endangered
Current
laevi ata
Vascular Plants
Schweinitz's Sunflower (Helianthus
Endangered
Current
schweinitzii)
Vascular Plants
Michaux's Sumac (Rhus michauxii)
Endangered
Current
Vertebrate
Northern Long -Eared Bat (Myotis
Threatened
Probable/Potential
septentrionalis)
Vertebrate
Bald Eagle (Haliaeetus
Protected under the Bald
Current
leucocephalus)
and Golden Eagle
Protection Act
Wetlands and Environmental Planning Group Leonard S. Rindner, PLLC.

Farmington Site - Threatened /Endangered /Protected Species Evaluation
Table 2: Threatened / Endangered / Protected Species listed for
Cabarrus County
County: Cabarrus, NC
*Source: US Fish & Wildlife Service
**Data search on April 2, 2018
Federal
Group Name Status Record Status
Vascular Schweinitz's Sunflower (Helianthus Endangered Current
Plants schweinitzii)
Vertebrate Northern Long -Eared Bat (Myotis Threatened Probable/Potential
septentrionalis)
Vertebrate Bald Eagle (Haliaeetus leucocephalus) Protected Current
Invertebrate Carolina Heelsplitter (Lasmigona decorata) Endangered Historic
Three plant species with federal protection were included in the survey efforts:
• Schweinitz's Sunflower (Helianthus schweinitzii), listed as Federally
Endangered, is typically found in open habitats which historically have
been maintained by wildfires and grazing bison and elk herds. Now most
occurrences are limited to roadsides, woodland and field edges, and utility
rights -of -way (ROW).
• Smooth Coneflower (Echinacea laevigata), listed as Federally
Endangered, is typically found in open woods, cedar barrens, roadsides,
clear cuts, dry limestone bluffs and power line rights -of -way, requiring
abundant sunlight and little competition from other plant species.
• Michaux's Sumac (Rhus michauxii), listed as Federally Endangered,
requires habitat of sandy forests and woodland edges. This species
requires periodic fire as a part of its ecology.
A total of four animal species with federal protection are listed as potentially
occurring in Mecklenburg and Cabarrus Counties:
Wetlands and Environmental Planning Group Leonard S. Rindner, PLLC.

Farmington Site - Threatened /Endangered /Protected Species Evaluation
Bald Eagle (Haliaeetus leucocephalus), protected by the Bald and Golden
Eagle Protection Act, typically inhabits forested areas near large bodies of
open water such as lakes, marshes, seacoasts and rivers, where there are
suitable fish populations and tall trees for nesting and roosting.
Carolina Heelsplitter (Lasmigona decorata), listed as Federally
Endangered, is restricted to cool, clean, well -oxygenated water. Stable,
silt- free stream beds are required for this species. Typically stable areas
occur where the stream banks are well -vegetated with trees and shrubs.
Northern Long-eared Bat (Myotis septentrionalis), listed as Federally
Threatened. During summer, northern long-eared bats roost singly or in
colonies underneath bark, in cavities, or in crevices of both live and dead
trees. Males and non -reproductive females may also roost in cooler
places, like caves and mines. It has also been found, rarely, roosting in
structures like barns and sheds. Northern long-eared bats spend winter
hibernating in caves and mines, called hibernacula.
Rusty -patched Bumble Bee (Bombus affinis), listed as Federally
Endangered, live in colonies that include a single queen and female
workers. Rusty -patched Bumble Bees historically occupied grasslands
and tallgrass prairies. Bumble bees need areas that provide nectar and
pollen from flowers, nesting sites (underground and abandoned rodent
cavities or clumps of grasses), and overwintering sites for hibernating
queens (undisturbed soil).
RESULTS:
The site is primarily old farmland and woodlands covered with successional old
fields, old pastures, fencerows, dirt roads, and mixed pine and hardwood forest
that is disturbed throughout. Old farm operation remnants are present including
old barn, silo, sheds, barbed wire fences, farm roads, scattered trash dumps and
wood piles.
A large portion of the site is abandoned agricultural, pasture and hay fields in a
state of old field succession. This scrub/shrub community is composed of pine
and hardwood saplings and young trees, and blackberry and woody vine
thickets. Dominant species present include Red Cedar (Juniperus virginiana),
Honey Locust (Gleditsia triacanthhos), Sweetgum (Liquidambar styraciflua),
Winged Elm, (Ulmus alata), Shortleaf Pine (Pinus echinata), Virginia Pine (Pinus
virginiana), Black Cherry (Prunus serotina), Black Gum (Nyssa sylvatica),
Blackberry (Rubus sp.), Russian Olive (Elaeagnus umbellate), Smooth Sumac
(Rhus glabra), Groundsel (Baccharis halimifolia), Japanese Honeysuckle
(Lonicera japonica), Catbrier (Smilax sp.), and Poison Ivy (Toxicodendron
radicans).
Wetlands and Environmental Planning Group Leonard S. Rindner, PLLC.

Farmington Site - Threatened /Endangered /Protected Species Evaluation
The assemblage of plants growing in the transitional and open disturbed areas
and roadsides includes Sericea Lespedeza (Lespedeza cuneata), Oxeye Daisy
(Chrysanthemum leucanthemum), Goldenrod (Solidago sp.), Blackberry,
Broomsedge (Andropogon virginicus), Groundsel (Senicio sp.), Johnson Grass
(Sorghum halepense), Rabbit Tobacco (Gnapthalium obtusifolium), Splitbeard
(A. ternarius), Goldenrod (Solidago sp.), Beggars Ticks (Desmodium sp.),
Thoroughwort (Eupatorium sp.), St. John's Wort (Hypericum punctatum), and
Venus' Looking Glass (Specularia perfoliata).
The disturbed mixed pine/hardwoods forest on the slopes and drainages has an
average diameter at breast height (dbh) for the canopy trees of 12 inches, with
some larger trees up to 30 inches dbh present. Canopy trees present include
Virginia Pine (Pinus virginiana), Shortleaf Pine (P. echinata), Sweetgum
(Liquidambar styraciflua), Tulip Poplar (Liriodendron tulipifera), White Oak
(Quercus alba), Post Oak (Q. stellata), Red Oak (Q. rubra), Southern Red Oak
(Q. falcata), Willow Oak (Q. phellos), Mockernut Hickory (Carya tomentosa),
Shagbark Hickory (C. ovata), Hackberry (Celtis laevigata), American Elm (Ulmus
americans), and White Ash (Fraxinus americans). The subcanopy is composed
of Flowering Dogwood (Cornus florida), American Holly (Ilex opaca), Mulberry
(Morus rubra), Winged Elm (Ulmus alata), Black Cherry (Prunus serotina),
Eastern Red Cedar (Juniperus virginiana), and Black Gum (Nyssa sylvatica).
The shrub layer includes Black Haw (Viburnum prunifolium), Chinese Privet
(Ligustrum sinense), Blueberry (Vaccinium spp.), and Russian Olive (Elaeagnus
angustifolia). Vines present are Japanese Honeysuckle (Lonicera japonica),
Virginia Creeper (Parthenocissus quinquefolia), Muscadine (Vitis rotundifolia),
Catbrier (Smilax sp.), and Poison Ivy (Toxicodendron radicans). The herb layer is
sparse, and includes Bracken Fern (Pteridium aquilinum), Christmas Fern
(Polystichum acrostichoides), Ebony Spleenwort (Asplenium platyneuron),
Spotted Wintergreen (Chimaphila maculata), Running Pine (Lycopodium
flabelliforme), Downy Rattlesnake Plantain (Goodyera pubescens), Curlyheads
(Clematis ochroleuca), Beardtongue (Penstemon sp.), Solomon's Seal
(Polygonatum biflorum) and Japanese Stilt Grass (Microstegium vimineum).
Threatened & Endangered/Protected Species Results
• All potential habitats for Schweinitz's Sunflower, Michaux's Sumac and
Smooth Coneflower along the roadsides and woods edges were examined
and none of these species were present.
• No habitat exists on the site for Bald Eagles, and there were no sightings
nor were any nesting sites observed.
• The on -site streams do not have the habitat characteristics required to
support populations of the Carolina Heelsplitter. Based on existing
documentation, Carolina Heelsplitter populations have not been previously
Wetlands and Environmental Planning Group Leonard S. Rindner, PLLC.

Farmington Site - Threatened /Endangered /Protected Species Evaluation
identified within this basin. No individuals were observed during the survey
nor would any be expected on -site.
Comparing this site location to the USFWS Asheville office's website
(http://www.fws.gov/asheville/htmis/project review/NLEB in WNC.html) it
appears that the site meets the "exempt" criteria which requires no further
action under section 7 of the Endangered Species Act for the Northern
Long-eared Bat.
Comparing this site location to the USFWS Range Map for Rusty -patched
Bumble Bee
(https://www.fws.gov/midwest/endangered/insects/rpbb/rpbbmap.htmi)
Mecklenburg County is in it's Historic Range, and as such, Section 7
consultation is not needed. WEPG concludes that Rusty -patched Bumble
Bee is not present.
RECOMMENDATIONS:
Based on the site investigation and the review of available data, WEPG did not
identify any protected species occurring on the subject property. No further
investigation of the presence of protected species on this site is recommended at
this time.
Respectfully submitted,
04W-1 # 1*e�l
Lisa R. Gaffney
Biologist
April 26, 2018
Wetlands and Environmental Planning Group Leonard S. Rindner, PLLC.

Farmington Site - Threatened /Endangered /Protected Species Evaluation
Curriculum Vitae for:
Lisa R. Gaffney
Biologist / Botanist
B.S. Biology, University of North Carolina at Charlotte
Ms. Gaffney is a classically trained Botanist and has conducted field work and
investigative studies covering thousands of cumulative acres in both North and South
Carolina since 1996, including:
• Cabarrus County NC Natural Heritage Inventory 1997-1998. Organized,
directed, and worked in field survey of natural areas in Cabarrus County for the
North Carolina Natural Heritage Program.
• Lincoln County NC Natural Heritage Inventory 2000-2001. Organized, directed,
and worked in field survey of natural areas in Lincoln County for the North
Carolina Natural Heritage Program.
• Threatened and Endangered Species Surveys and Natural Communities
Evaluation for over 45,000 acres in North and South Carolina, 1996 - present.
• Located and identified at least six previously unreported populations of Federally
Endangered Schweinitz's Sunflower (Helianthus schweinitzii).
• Located and identified four previously unreported populations of
Threatened Dwarf Heartleaf (Hexastylis naniflora).
• Located a previously unknown population of Federally Endangered Schweinitz's
Sunflower at Redlair Farm in Gaston County, NC. This discovery led (in part) to
the purchase of the site by the State of North Carolina Plant Conservation
Program, now called Redlair Preserve. This population has become a Recovery
Site for the species.
• Participated in numerous Piedmont Prairie restoration projects in Mecklenburg,
Union, Cabarrus and Gaston Counties, North Carolina.
Wetlands and Environmental Planning Group Leonard S. Rindner, PLLC.