510039_Monitoring (Report)_20190819

,51-003q
GW-59A COMPLIANCE REPORT FORM Permit #
(Submit one each monitoring period with GIV-59fornas.)
I
Enter date monitoring results were due. ( ) Will this monitoring report (GW-59 and GW-59A)
YGs
NO
be submitted after the established due date?
--
2
Was any required information missing on the GIN-59 report forms?
YCS�
(NO
IF the answer to question I or 2 is "YES', list in the space provided below the well identification number(s) and
explain the problems encountered in obtaining the required information.
3
Are any of the monitor wells in need of repair m' main to na lice (damaged casing, unlocked or missing cap, missing
Y
i O
identification plate, area overgrown, etc.)? 1jthe onswer is "yes", contact the Regional Office for guidance.
--
4
Are any monitored constituents equal to or above the established standards?
If the answer to question 4 is "NO", skip to section 8.
If the answer to question 4 is "YES" list the affected wells individually with constituent(s) and concentrations)
exceeding standards in the space provided below,
�✓ �CQ.(!' =6f�r9�, �r i.3�hl. -;^P,
��.�ccry -.-
5
For the constituents identified in question 4 above have standards been previous) for the
YES
O
---
same constituents) in the same well(s) in the last two years?-
—--------
If the answer to question 5 is "NO", skip to section 8.
----
--'—
If the answer to question 5 is "YES", list in the space provided below, each exceeding
standards, concentrations) reported, and sample collection date for each oc6u4e6ce (for the fast two years).
AUG 2 9 2019
ti
Are the monitoring wells listedd fn section 5 located at or beyond the review boundary? --
Y[sti;
NO
If the answer is "YES", a groundwater quality problem may be occurring. CONTACT THE REGIONAL
OFFICE IMMEDIATELY FOR GUIDANCE. If the answer is "NO", monitoring wells may be improperly
located; contact the Regional Office.
7
Is the permittee implementing previously approved actions required by the Division involving this
Y4;S�
NO
groundwater quality problem?
If the answer to question 7 is "YES', describe those actions in the space provided below.
If the answer to question 7 is "NO", contact the Regional Office within 90 days; an evaluation may be
required to determine the impact the waste disposal system is having at the review and compliance
boundaries surrounding this facility. Failure to do so may subject the Lermittee to a Notice of Violation
fines, and/or penalties.
r
Uy
M
rj
g
The person completing this portion (GW-59A) of the monitoring report should sign below and submit this
form with GW-59 forms for required wells to the address provided at the top of the current GW-59 form.
I hereby acknowledge that the above information was evaluated and the information submitted in this
report (Compliance eport GW-59A). is true and complete to the best of my knowledge.
S gnature of Permittee (or Authorized Agent) �t©
r-1
r,!
(AV-59A 12/8/2003

Cameron Testing Services, Inc. Laboratory Report NCDENR#654
is NC PHHS #37799
Lassiter Farms ftow:
'US EPA#NC01918
�191338
1 MR ctwJuly 2019 Monitoring Wells Yes Page 1 of 3
iol ,
Sample Information
C. Cameron 3 Da_ Y 07/16/19 Ke iv d F. Steen 4� 07/16/19
3�
Analyses and Results
1 uo
71.0
mg/L
25
07/19/19
2540 C - TDS
Chloride
12.5
mg/L
0.01
07/17/19
4500 Cl- D
N-NO2
<0.005
mg/L
0.005
07/18/19
4500 NO2 - 8
N-NO3
0.902
mg/L
0.05
07/18/19
4500 NO3 - E
N-NH3
<0.100
mg/L
0.1
07/18/19
4500 NH3 - D
Tot. P
0,061
mg/L
o.05
07/22/19
4500 P - WE
Metals
Attached
Fee. Coliform-W
<1
CFu
/100mL
1
07/16/19
9222 D • MF
02 MW-3 cW Gr TDS
432
mg/L
25
07/19/19
2540 C •TDS
Chloride
18.5
mga
0.01
07/17/19
4500 Cl. D
N-NO2
<0.005
mg/L
0.005
07/18/19
4500 NO2 - B
N-NO3
<0.050
mg/L
0.05
07/18/19
4500 NO3 - E
N-NH3
<0.100
mg/L
0.1
07/18/19
4500 NH3 -D
Tot. P
0.545
mg/L
0.05
07/22/19
4500 P - B/E
Metals
Attached
Fee. Coliform-W
26
CFU
nOomL
1
07/16/19
9222 D - MF
Metals (K, Na, CU, Zn) analyzed by ENCO, Cary, NC; report attached.
219 S. Steele Sir.
Sanford NC 27330 919.208-4240
[e-mail]01

Cameron Testing Services, Inc. Laboratory Report
NCDENR#654
" `Client L
Lassiter Farms
wd,
NC PHHS #37799
US EPA #NC01918
� lj
191338
P�ojeot July 2019 Monitoring Wells
"A"
Page
Yes 2 of 3
N
Sample Information
' NN ampied C. Cameron Y Datea 07/16/19 I e elved? F. Steen Datpiite 07/16/19
Analyses and Results
l ua
116
mg/L
25
07/19/19
2540 C - TDS
Chloride
44.5
mg/L
0.01
07/17/19
4500 Cl- D
N-NO2
<0.005
mg/L
0.005
07/18/19
4500 NO2 - B
N-NO3
3.39
mg/L
0.05
07/18/19
4500 NO3 - E
N-NH3
<0.100
mg/L
0.1
07/18/19
4600 NH3 - D
Tot. P
0.302
mg/L
0.05
07/22/19
4500 P - B/E
Metals
Attached
Fee. Coliform-W
<t
CFu
/100mL
1
07/16/19
9222 D - MF
04 M W-1 Gw Gr TDS
50.0
mg&
25
07/19/19
2540 C - TDS
Chloride
6.50
mga
0.01
07/17/19
4500 Cl- D
N-NO2
<0.005
mg/L
0.005
07/18/19
4500 NO2 - B
N•NO3
4.39
mg/L
0.05
07/18/19
4500 NO3 - E
N-NH3
5.72
mg/L
0.1
07/18/19
4500 NH3 - D
Tot, P
0.061
mg/L
0.05
07/22/19
4500 P - B/E
Metals
Attached
Fee. Coliform-W
<1
CFu
/100mL
1
07/16/19
9222 D - MF
Metals (K, Na, Cu, Zn) analyzed by ENCO, Cary, NC; report attached.
219 S. Steele Str.
Sanford NC 27330 919-208-4240
chris rr camerontesting.com

Cameron Testing Services, Inc. Laboratory Report
Lassiter Farms
July 2019 Monitoring Wells
NC DENR #654
NC PHHS #37799
US EPA#NC01918
191338
Yes Page 3 of 3
Sample Information
4
$amP1etl ` t C. Cameron Date v 07/16/19� v�d; F. Steen tDOO, 07/16/19
Analyses and Results
uiy uverl
Report
Review-
--
Project Manager
219 S. Steele Str.
Sanford NC 27330
Datte o -- ------ (r �--._...__._— --
919-208.4240
chris@camerontesting. corn

i I
N
i OI 1
w
ro
ti
NI
m
' I I
i I j
I � I
j I
l�
t
Crn
C ,
coI
� I
L
�
N
VI
o
NI
C
o �
eU)O
w ro
N
d/0l t
m
IGS b'OA
-
epetseg?_I
ro
009 / OZE
'luo Z/t
I I
�
I
I
(N/A) 001
>-
1
xlj;ew
I
3: I
I Z
(�7
quiC / dw0o
ewll
I M.
o�
ejecl17
I
�
TmEMZ-
d

Accurate. Timely.
Responsive.
102-A Woodwinds Industrial Court
Cary NC, 27511
Phone: [phone] FAX: 919.467,3515
Monday, August 12, 2019
Cameron Testing Services, Inc. (CA039)
Attn: Maryanne Sims
219 South Steele Street
Sanford, NC 27330
RE: Laboratory Results for
Project Number: 191338, Project Name/Desc: July MWs
ENCO Workorder(s): CC12345
Dear Maryanne Sims,
Enclosed is a copy of your laboratory report for test samples received by our laboratory on
Friday, July 19, 2019.
Unless otherwise noted in an attached project narrative, all samples were received in
acceptable condition and processed in accordance with the referenced methods/procedures.
Results for these procedures apply only to the samples as submitted.
The analytical results contained in this report are in compliance with NELAC standards, except
as noted in the project narrative if applicable. This report shall not be reproduced except in
full, without the written approval of the Laboratory.
This report contains only those analyses performed by Environmental Conservation
Laboratories. Unless otherwise noted, all analyses were performed at ENCO Cary. Data from
outside organizations will be reported under separate cover.
If you have any questions or require further information, please do not hesitate to contact me.
Sincerely,
Stephanie Franz
Project Manager
Enclosure(s)
FINAL This report relates only to the sample as received by the laterstory, and may only be reproduced in full. Page 1 of 6

www.encolabs.com
PROJECT NARRATIVE
Date: 12 August 2019
Client: Cameron Testing Services, Inc. (CA039)
Project: July MWs
Lab ID: CC12345
Overview
This report is an amendment to the original report dated 30 July 2019 for this work order. This report was revised, at the
client's request, to add Copper to the list of reported analytes.
Environmental Conservation Laboratories, Inc. (ENCO) analyzed all submitted samples in accordance with the methods
referenced in the laboratory report. Any particular difficulties encountered during sample handling by ENCO are discussed In
the QC Remarks section below.
Quality Control Samples
No Comments
Quality Control Remarks
No Comments
Other Comments
The analytical data presented in this report are consistent with the methods as referenced in the analytical report. Any
exceptions or deviations are noted in the QC remarks section of this narrative or in the Flags/Notes and Definitions section of
the report.
Released By:
Environmental Conservation Laboratories, Inc.
Stephanie Franz
Project Manager
FINAL This report relates only to the Sample as received by the laboratory, and may only be reproduced In full. I Page 2 Of B

W Wtv.encolabs.com
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
Description: MW4 Lab Sample ID:CC12345-01 Received: 07/19/19 14:57
Matrix: Ground Water Sampled:07/16/19 13:12 Work Order: CC12345
Project: July MWs Sampled By: Client
Metals (total recoverable) by EPA 6000/7000 Series Methods
Analyte [CAS Numb ri
Resul Flag
Units
PE Hu LQ.I_
Batch
Method
Analyzed
By Notes
Calcium [7440.70.2]A
4050
ug/L
1 39.0 100
9G25013
EPA 6010D
07/29/19 14:12
JDH
Copper [7440.50-8]A
16.2
ug/L
1 1.60 10.0
9G25013
EPA 6010D
07/29/19 14:12
JDH
Potassium [7440.09-7]A
3840
ug/L
1 150 Soo
9G25013
EPA 6010D
07/29/19 14:12
JDH
Sodium[7440.23-5]A
15800
ug/L
1 400 500
9G25013
EPA 6010D
07/29/19 14:12
JDH
Zinc [7440.66-6]A
26.9
ug/L
1 4.40 1010
9G25013
EPA 6010D
07/29/19 14:12
)DH
Description: MW3
Lab Sample ID:CC12345-02
Received: 07/19/19 14:57
Matrix: Ground Water
Sampled:07/16/19
13:31
Work Order: CC12345
Project: July MWs
Sampled By: Client
Metals (total recoverable)
by EPA 6000/7000
Series Methods
^ - ENCO Cary eerfiAed analyfe[NC 591]
Analyte rCASNumberl
Results ,Flag
units
RE MP_L M
Batch
Method
Analyzed
,gy Notes
Calcium[7440-70-2]A
10600
ug/L
1 39.0 100
9G25013
EPA 6010D
07/29/19 14:15
JDH
Copper (7440.50-8]A
48.4
ug/L
1 1.60 10.0
9G25013
EPA 6010D
07/29/19 14:15
JDH
Potassium[7440.09-7]A
21500
ug/L
1 150 500
9G25013
EPA 6010D
07/29/19 14:15
JDH
Sodium [7440-23-5]A
6840
ug/L
1 400 Soo
9G25013
EPA 6010D
07/29/19 14:15
JDH
Zinc [7440-66.6]A
35.6
ug/L
1 4.40 10.0
91525013
EPA 6010D
07/29/19 14:15
JDH
Description: MWS
Lab Sample ID:CC12345-03
Received: 07/19/19 14:57
Matrix: Ground Water
Sampled:07/16/19
13:47
Work Order: CC12345
Project: July MWs
Sampled By: Client
Metals (total recoverable)
by EPA 6000/7000
Series Methods
Analyte [CAS Number]
Results
fjg_q
Units
gE MOL
"
Batch
Method
Analyzed
$y Notes
Calcium [7440.70-2]A
548
ug/L
1 39.0
100
9625013
EPA 6010D
07/29/19 14:18
JDH
Copper[7440-50-e]A
3.92
J
ug/L
1 1.60
10.0
9G25013
EPA 6010D
07/29/19 14:18
JDH
Potassium[7440.09-7]A
9380
ug/L
1 150
Soo
9G25013
EPA 6010D
07/29/19 14:18
JDH
Sodium [7440.23.5]A
340D
ug/L
1 400
Soo
9G25013
EPA 6010D
07/29/19 14:18
JDH
Zinc[7440-66-6]A
4.40
U
ug/L
1 4.40
10.0
9G25013
EPA 6010D
07/29/19 14:18
JDH
Description: MI
Lab Sample ID: CC12345-04
Received: 07/19/19 14:57
Matrix: Ground Water
Sampled:07/16/19
14:01
Work Order: CC12345
Project: July MWs
Sampled By: Client
Metals (total recoverable)
by EPA 6000/7000
Series Methods
^ -ENCO Cary rertiged m,1yM[NC 5911
Analyte rCAS Number!
Results
plan
Units
12E M"
E41
A=
Method
Analyze tl
@y Notes
Calcium[7440-70-2]A
4120
ug/L
1 39.0
100
9G25013
EPA 6010D
07/29/1914:33
JDH
Copper[7440-50-8]A
4.10
J
ug/L
1 1.60
10.0
9G25013
EPA 6010D
07/29/1914:33
JDH
Potassium[7440.09-7]A
5750
ug/L
1 150
500
9G25013
EPA 6010D
07/29/1914:33
JDH
Sodium [7440.23-Sp
4320
ug/L
1 400
Soo
9G25013
EPA 6010D
07/29/19 14:33
JDH
Zinc[7440.66-6]A
10.6
ug/L
1 4.40
10.0
9G25013
EPA 6010D
07/29/1914:33
JDH
FINAL This report relates only to the sample as received by the laboratory, and may only bereprcducedInfull. Page 3 D] 6

411111111 WD
www.encolabs.com
FLAGS/NOTES AND DEFINITIONS 1
B The analyte was detected In the associated method blank.
D The sample was analyzed at dilution.
J The reported value is between the laboratory method detection limit (MDL) and the laboratory method
reporting limit (MRL), adjusted for actual sample preparation data and moisture content, where applicable.
U The analyte was analyzed for but not detected to the level shown, adjusted for actual sample preparation
data and moisture content, where applicable.
E The concentration indicated for this analyte Is an estimated value above the calibration range of the
Instrument. This value is considered an estimate.
MRL Method Reporting Limit, The MRL is roughly equivalent to the practical quantitation limit (PQL) and is
based on the low point of the calibration curve, when applicable, sample preparation factor, dilution
factor, and, in the case of soil samples, moisture content.
PQL PQL: Practical Quantitation Limit. The PQL presented is the laboratory MRL.
N The analysis Indicates the presence of an analyte for which there is presumptive evidence (85% or greater
confidence) to make a "tentative Identification".
Greater than 25% concentration difference was observed between the primary and secondary GC column.
The lower concentration is reported.
(CALC] Calculated analyte - MDL/MRL reported to the highest reporting limit of the component analyses.
FINAL This report relates only to the sample asrecelvedbythe labomtory,and may only bereproduced Infull, I Page 4o16

Z
0
0
0
horlh
U)
(D
',
.I ipn
M
C,
C,
0
C,
�,5 M
cot,w
co
co
(0
Cl
co
g 0
cr
7
V
0
m
fixi�o
z
co
it
z
z
z
z
K, Na, Ca, Zn
m
(n
o
0
>
X
m
0
O
ur
Page 5 of 6

Sample Preservation Verification
ENCO Cary
Work Order:
CC12345
Project:
July MWs
Client:
Cameron Testing Services, Inc. (CA039)
Project #:
191338
Logged In: 20-Jul-19 09:12 /� /� Logged By: Rachel Ann Yonish _
Preservation Check Performed By: L%,t,� Date/Time: %Ig l q'
CC12345-01
fir r n
p lh , d ted el
t d_� dideaanF
tisdfCam uta r
A
250mLP+HNO3
<2
' Y N / NA
Y / N / NA
CC12345-02
�5�
(� (`T'
,� 9.'
"fi,'' m��s'�eO7y,Q
bb�ll
A
250mLP+HNO3
<2
Y N/ NA
I Y/ N NA
CC12345-03
ConC
7� e r 3r�P
7t@m�d
hie !A @�
U�.tF t9
_ b .r.>_° lust .._., I
(1�rtUAedC� rte�ts# y',:
„T�
A
250mLP+HNO3
<2
Y N/ NA
I Y/ N NA
CC12345-04
COpix
�
fYPepM`'
.S 8
R iYj�
hEl'
is e�o .:�tlft2sf
-. .` te' fE'
da�,ga4Gmi7�eEtt$
r RT%15M c^} s ws
A
250rnLP+HNO3
<2 �J
Y N / NA
I Y &I NA
2 Rea ent Name ID
pH Strip ID:
PH Strips C810741
C:\elmnt\Prin...... .._, ,,,,, ,,,,Nt
4 Reaen 1
Rea ent Name ID
5
6
Page 6 of 6
Page; o 1

SuInmary of Monitored Constituents Exceeding Standard
Lassiter Swine Farm (07/16/19)
MONITORING I MONINSTITELL In CDUENTORE DT SS DATES EXCEEDING ESTABLISHED CONCENTRATIONSREPORTED CLASS GA GROUNDWATER
OSTANDARDS STANDARD
MW-I Fecal Coliforms 11/30/2009 <10 cfu/l00mL I cfu/100mL
03/30/2010 <10 cfu/100mL
07/28/2010 <20 cfu/100mL
11/10/2010 <5 cfu/100mL
03/29/2011 <20 cfu/100mL
07/29/2011 82 cfu/l00mL
11/30/2011 <10 cfu/100mL
03/30/2012 <4 cfu/100mL
11/20/2015 1.0 cfu/100inL
Nitrate
11/30/2009
12.1 mg/L as N
10.0 mg/L
03/30/2010
19.0 mg/L as N
07/28/2010
13.1 mg/L as N
11/10/2010
11.3 mg/L as N
07/29/2011
11.1 mg/L as N
11/30/2011
10.3 mg/L as N
07/31/2012
10.7 mg/L as N
03/28/2013
12.1 ing/L as N
07/30/2013
11.7 ing/L as N
11/26/2013
11.4 mg/L as N
03/28/2014
11.9 mg/L as N
03/31/2015
11.4 ing/L as
NO2+NO3
07/06/18
10.2 mg/L as N
Zinc
03/31/16
1.07 mg/L
1.0 mg/L
MW-2
Nitrate
11/30/2009
30.0 mg/L as N
10.0 mg/L
03/30/2010
16.1 ing/L as N
07/28/2010
22.7 mg/L as N
11/10/2010
21.8 mg/L as N
03/29/2011
26.7 ing/L as N
07/29/2011
29.4 ing/L as N
11/30/2011
21.6 mg/L as N
03/30/2012
18.2 mg/L as N
03/28/2013
18.3 mg/L as N
07/30/2013
24.5 mg/L as N
11/26/2013
03/28/2014 116.3
18.7 mg/L as N
mg/L as N

M W--3
07/29/2014
15.1 mg/L as N
11/25/2014
12.5 mg/L as N
03/31/2015
11.7 mg/L as
NO2+NO3
07/29/2015
10.5 mg/L as
NO2+NO3
03/31/2016
12..2 mg/L as N
07/28/2016
12.6 mg/L as N
03/14/17
17.3 mg/L as N
07/11/17
11.1 mg/L as N
11/07/17
15.8 mg/L as N
03/02/18
12.6 mg/L as N
03/08/19
11.9 mg/L as N
Fecal Coliforms 11/30/2009
<2 cfu/IOOmL
03/30/2010
<2 cfu/IOOmL
07/28/2010
<10 cfu/IOOmL
11/10/2010
<5 cfu/IOOmL
03/29/2011
<10 cfu/IOOmL
07/29/2011
<10 cfu/IOOmL
11/30/2011
<10 cfu/100mL
11/20/2015
1 c£u/100mL
03/31/2016
11 cfu/100mL
11/13/18
25 cfu/100mL
Fecal Coliform
11/30/2009
8 cfu/100mL
03/30/2010
3000 cfu/IOOmL
07/28/2010
<20 cfu/IOOmL
11/10/2010
<5 cfu/IOOmL
03/29/2011
<20 cfu/100mL
07/29/2011
<\10 cfu/100mL
11/30/2011
<10 cfu/100mL
03/30/2012
2 cfu/100mL
07/30/2013
1300 cfu/100mL
11/26/2013
1 cfu/100mL
03/28/2014
2 cfu/100inL
07/29/2014
1 cfu/100mL
11/25/2014 1
cfu/100mL
11/20/2015 25
cfu/l00mL
03/31/2016 3
cfu/100mL
Nitrate 103/28/2013 15.8 mg/L As N
1 cfu/IOOmL
I cfu/IOOmL
10 mg/L

Sodium
03/28/2013
25.1 nm /L
g
20.Omg/L
MW-4 Fecal Coliform
11/30/2009
<4 cfu/IOOmL
1 cfu/IOOmL
03/30/2010
<2 cfu/IOOmL
07/28/2010
<20 cfu/100mL
11/10/2010
<5 cfu/IOOmL
03/29/2011
<20cfu/I00mL
07/29/2011
<10 cfu/IOOtnL
11/30/2011
<10 cfu/100mL
07/30/2013
191 cfu/IOOmL
3/28/2014
2 cfu/100mL
11/25/2014
4 cfu/100mL
11/20/2015
6,000 cfu/100mL
MW-5 Fecal Coliform
11/30/2009
<2 cfu/IOOmL
I cfu/100mL
03/30/2010
<2 cfu/100mL
07/28/2010
<10 cfu/IOOmL
11/10/2010
6 cfu/100mL
03/29/2011
<20cfu/100mL
07/29/2011
<10 cfu/I OOmL
11/30/2011
<10 cfu/IOOmL
07/30/2013
3 cfu/IOOmL
11/20/2015
12 cfu/IOOmL
07/06/18
3 cfu/IOOmL
11/13/18
332 cfu/100inL
Nitrate
07/31/2012
11.0 mg/L as N
10 m L
11/28/2012
20.3 mg/L as N
03/28/2013
12.4 mg/L as N
Sodium
Note: Bolded values indicate results above
11/28/2012 24.8 nmg/L
the Class
20.0 mg/ L
r07/1 rn o,
GA Groundwater
Standard for the most
recent