20121145 Ver 2_401 Application_20171217

Kimley»>Horn
Transmittal
Date: December 28, 2017 Job Number: 015016181
Project Name: City View Stream
To: Karen Higgins
NC DWR, 401 & Buffer Permitting Unit
512 N. Salisbury Street, 91 Floor
Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
We are sending these by
Fj U.S. Mail ® FedEx
F] Other:
We are sending you
N Attached
❑ Shop Drawings
® Other: Check
❑ Under separate cover via
El Prints/Plans El Samples
❑ Hand Deliver
the following items:
Specifications ❑ Change Orders
Copies Date No. Description
4 5/14/2015 1 404/401 Pre -Construction Notification Package
1 5/14/2015 2 PCN Application Fee Check
2 5/14/2015 3 Full -Size Plan Sheets
4 5/14/2015 4 Half -Size Plan Sheets
These are transmitted as checked below:
® For your use E] Approved as gabmitted ❑ Resubmit F� Copies for approval
As requested ❑ Approved as noted ® Submit ❑ Copies for distribution
❑ For review and comment ❑ Returned for corrections [:] Return E] Corrected prints
Remarks:
If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at 704-409-1802.
Copy to: File Signed Chris Tinklenberg
PAI

Preliminary ORM Data Entry Fields for New Actions
ACTION ID #: SAW- 2017- Begin Date (Date Received):
Prepare file folder ❑ Assign Action ID Number in ORM ❑
1. Project Name [PCN Form A2a]: City View Stream Restoration Project
2. Work Type: ❑Private ❑Institutional ❑✓ Government 1:1 Commercial
3. Project Description / Purpose [PCN Form 133d and 133e]:
The proposed project seeks to perform stream restoration on 1,340 linear feet (If) of an unnamed tributary to Campbell Creek, in Charlotte, North Carolina. Stream
restoration was previously performed on the unnamed tributary in 2013 which resulted in 1,340 if of stream however, there were significant failures which require a
full redesign of two reaches within the mitigation site. The proposed redesign will result in 1,222 If of stream, which results in a net loss of 1181£ of waters of the
US from implementing natural channel design techniques to repair the reach and adjust the dimension, plan, and profile. The previous design included a belt width
typically associated with a meandering C-type channel which is not appropriate for this setting. The redesign includes a smaller belt width associated with more of a
step -pool system. This change is what primarily resulted in the loss of the stream length.
4. Property Owner / Applicant [PCN Form A3 or A41: City of Charlotte; POC: Erin Shanaberger, WPIT
5. Agent / Consultant [PNC Form A5 — or ORM Consultant ID Number]:
Kimley-Horn & Associates, Inc. - Chris Tinklenberg, PWS
6. Related Action ID Number(s) [PCN Form 135b]: SAW -2012-0028
7. Project Location —Coordinates, Street Address, and/or Location Description [PCN Form Blb]:
The project limits -of -disturbance includes two separate areas. The Reach 1 project area begins behind an adjacent car dealership at 6025 E.
Independence Blvd. and ends at Dion Avenue. The Reach 3 project area begins behind a residential property at 2246 Brook Crossing Ct. and ends
at Dom Cir
8. Project Location —Tax Parcel ID [PCN Form Bla]: Multiple Parcels (PID# 16504227 & 16507167)
9. Project Location— County [PCN Form A2b]: Mecklenburg County
10. Project Location —Nearest Municipality or Town [PCN Form A2c]: Charlotte
11. Project Information — Nearest Waterbody [PCN Form 132a]: UT to Campbell Creek
12. Watershed / 8 -Digit Hydrologic Unit Code [PCN Form 132c]: 03050103
Authorization: Section 10 ❑ Section 404 ❑
Regulatory Action Type:
❑ Standard Permit
✓ Nationwide Permit # 27
Regional General Permit #
✓ Jurisdictional Determination Request
Section 10 and 404 ❑
Pre -Application Request
Unauthorized Activity
8 Compliance
No Permit Required
9 0
N
Inn
Revised 20150602

Kimley>»Horn
December 27, 2017
Ms. Crystal Amschler
Asheville Regulatory Field Office
US Army Corps of Engineers
151 Patton Avenue, Room 208
Asheville, NC 28801-5006
Ms. Karen Higgins
NC DWR, 401 & Buffer Permitting Unit
512 North Salisbury Street
Raleigh, NC 27604
Re: 404/401 Pre -Construction Notification (NWP 27) &
Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination Request
City View Stream Restoration Project
Charlotte, Mecklenburg County, NC
Dear Ms. Amschler and Ms. Higgins:
On behalf of our client, The City of Charlotte (City), Kimley-Horn (KH) is submitting the enclosed joint
Section 404/401 Preconstruction Notification for the above referenced project for your review
pursuant to Nationwide Permit 27 and General 401 Water Quality Certification number 4134, as well
as a Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination (PJD) request. Authorization is requested to perform
stream restoration activities necessary to repair failures along two reaches of an unnamed tributary of
Campbell Creek (City View Creek) within the City View Stream Mitigation Site, part of the City of
Charlotte's Stream and Wetland Mitigation Bank. Stream failures within the site require a full redesign
of Reaches 1 and 3 in order to re -stabilize the stream reaches' bed and banks to provide the uplift to
the aquatic environmental originally intended. The center of the project area is located at
35.17916°N, - 80.74971'W. The following information is included as part of this application submittal:
• Project Summary Sheet
• Pre -Construction Notification Form
• Project Site Figures
■ Figure 1 — Vicinity
■ Figure 2 — USGS 7.5' Topo (Charlotte East Quadrangle)
■ Figure 3 — Meck. Co. SSURGO Soils (2017 Meck. Co. Aerial)
■ Figure 4 — PJD Field Sketch (2017 Meck. Co. Aerial)
■ Figure 5 — Proposed Conditions
• Construction Plans of Proposed City View Restoration Project
• Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination (PJD)
• Field Data Forms
■ NCDWR Stream Identification Forms
• Project Site Photographs
• Agency Correspondence
kimley-horn.com 200 South Tryon Street, Suite 200, Charlotte, NC 28202 704-333-5131

Kimley>»Horn
Project Background
Page 2
Charlotte Storm Water Service (CSWS) performed stream restoration and enhancement along 1,908
linear feet of an unnamed tributary of Campbell Creek in 2013 in order to provide uplift to the aquatic
environmental while generating mitigation credits as part of the City of Charlotte's Stream and
Wetland Mitigation Bank. Since that time, CMSWS has identified two reaches within the mitigation
site that have demonstrated instabilities and failures which require a redesign of each reach. An
approved jurisdictional determination was provided with the original permit authorization dated
January 2, 2013 (SAW -2012-0028). Since the AJD is set to expire on January 2, 2018, at the request
of CMSWS, Kimley-Horn has reevaluated the jurisdictional status of features within the project limits -
of -disturbance and a request for a preliminary jurisdictional determination is included with this
submittal.
Field Observations
On December 19, 2017, Kimley-Horn staff, Chris Tinklenberg, PWS, visited the site to verify the
location and classification of potentially jurisdictional waters within the project area. Kimley-Horn's
field review of the project area identified three potentially jurisdictional non -wetland waters. Streams
1 and 2 were classified as perennial streams, while Stream 3 was classified as intermittent. Results
of the site visit are depicted on Figure 4 PJD Field Sketch and representative photographs of each
feature are included in the project site photo pages.
Approach
A segmented channel rehabilitation approach will be used to create hydraulic and geomorphic
functional uplift of the project area and help the stream evolve to a more stable form. A combination
rehabilitation approach—that includes restoring profile and dimension at existing or slightly raised bed
elevation—will be used for both reaches with some very minor relocation and pattern adjustment
(mostly to low flow; see attached Plan). Rehabilitation activities primarily will focus on the creation of
improved hydraulic geometry and improved bank angles. An active floodplain at the bankfull elevation
will be created where constraints allow. In addition, stable bank slopes, riffle -pool sequences (i.e., depth
variability), step -pools, and buffers will be enhanced or restored. Improved hydraulic geometry (low
flow, inner berms, and flood prone) combined with an "active" floodprone bench (where feasible) will
help reduce total suspended solids (TSS) within the channel by eliminating the onsite source and
providing a sediment sink. Point bars and inner -berms will also be constructed for sediment deposition
and to improve sediment competency. The inner berms also will serve to dissipate stream velocities
during the more frequent storms, which is especially important in an urban setting where the storm
events are flashy in nature.
The designed size of a floodplain bench will incorporate the ideal hydraulic geometry with newly sloped
banks which will seek to lower shear stress with the intent to reduce future bank erosion to natural
levels (BEHI of low -to -moderate). The stream profile is modified to create more local slope variability
(i.e., steeper riffles and flat pools).
The existing buffers in the project area will be improved or restored if impacted through the addition of
a mix of trees, shrubs, and herbaceous species.
The proposed redesign will result in 1,222 If of stream, which results in a net loss of 118 If of waters of
the US from implementing natural channel design techniques to repair the reach and adjust the
dimension, plan, and profile. The previous design included a belt width typically associated with a
meandering C-type channel which is not appropriate for this setting. The redesign includes a smaller
200 South Tryon Street, Suite 200, Charlotte, NC 28202

Kimley>»Horn
Page 3
belt width associated with more of a step -pool system. This change is what primarily resulted in the
loss of the stream length.
AVOIDANCE AND MINIMIZATION
Impacts have been avoided and minimized to the extent practicable and have been limited to what is
necessary to facilitate stream restoration. To prevent sedimentation of downstream portions of the
affected streams, construction will be conducted in the dry through the use of coffer dams and pump-
arounds. Temporary erosion and sediment control measures placed in waters will be removed and
the original grade restored upon completion of the project. Banks temporarily affected by
maintenance work will be matted, re -seeded and restored to stable bank conditions.
Please feel free to contact me at [phone] if you have any questions or if additional information
is necessary.
Sincerely,
KIMLEY-HORN AND
ASSOCIATES, INC.
Chris Tinklenberg, PWS
Environmental Scientist
Attachments
Cc: Kyle Hall, P.E.
Project Manager
City of Charlotte

Kimley>>>Horn
Project Summary Sheet
Project Name: City View Stream Restoration Project
Applicant Name and Address: City of Charlotte
POC: Erin Shanaberger
600 East Fourth Street
Charlotte, NC 28202
Telephone Number: 704-562-2691
Type of Request:
® Nationwide PCN (NWP # 27) ❑ Individual Permit Application
® Jurisdictional Determination ❑ Other:
Included Attachments:
® Project Plans
® USGS Map ® NRCS Soil Survey
Intermittent and/or Unimportant Perennial and/or Important
❑ Agent Authorization
® Delineation Sketch ❑ Delineation Survey
(acres)
❑ Data Forms (Up & Wet)
® NCDWR Stream Forms ❑ USACE Stream Forms
❑ NCEEP Confirmation
® Aerial Photo ® Site Photos
Perm. Temp.
❑ Agency Correspondence
❑ Other: ❑ Other:
Check if applicable:
❑ CAMA County
❑ Trout County ❑ Isolated Waters
If ac if
❑ Section 7, ESA
❑ Section 106, NHPA ❑ EFH
❑ Mitigation Proposed (❑ NC EEP ❑ On -Site ❑ Off -Site ❑ Other)
County: Mecklenburg
Nearest City/Town: Charlotte
Waterway: UT to Campbell Creek
River Basin: Lower Catawba
H.U.C.: 03050103
USGS Quad Name: Charlotte East, NC
Property Size (acres): 1.48ac
Site Coordinates (in decimal degrees):
Approx. Size of Jurisdiction on Site (acres): 0.18ac
35.179128 ON -80.747846 °W
Project Location: The project limits -of -disturbance are located in Charlotte, Mecklenburg County, NC and includes two
separate areas. The Reach 1 project area begins behind an adjacent car dealership at 6025 E. Independence Blvd. and
ends at Dion Avenue. The Reach 3 proiect area begins behind a residential property at 2246 Brook Crossing Ct. and ends
at Dorn Cir.
Site Description: The project area is part of the City View Stream Mitigation Site and is contained within a conservation
easement. Existing land use in the vicinity of the project includes residential neighborhoods and commercial
development
Impact Summary (if applicable): The proposed project will impact 1,340 linear feet 0f) of stream. Stream restoration
was previously performed on the unnamed tributary in 2013 which resulted in 1,340 if of stream however, there were
significant failures which require a full redesign of two reaches within the mitigation site. The proposed redesign will result
in 1,222 if of stream which results in a net loss of 118 if of waters of the US from implementing natural channel design
techniques to repair the reach and adjust the dimension, plan, and profile. The previous design included a belt width typically
associated with a meandering C-type channel which is not appropriate for this setting. The redesign includes a smaller belt
width associated with more of a stgppool system. This change is what primarily resulted in the loss of the stream length.
Kimley-Horn Contact: Chris Tinklenberg, PWS Direct Number: [phone]
Email: chris.tinklenberg(a,kimley-horn.com
200 South Tryon Street, Suite 200, Charlotte, NC 28202
Stream Channel
Open Water
Wetland
Intermittent and/or Unimportant Perennial and/or Important
NWP
(acres)
(acres)
Aquatic Function Aquatic Function
#
Tem .
Perm. Temp.
Perm.
Temp. Perm.
Temp. Perm.
if ac
If ac if
ac if Ac
27
1,340 0.18
Total
1,340 0.18
1,340/0.18
Total Permanent Impact to Waters of the U.S. (If/acres)
1181f net loss WoUS
Kimley-Horn Contact: Chris Tinklenberg, PWS Direct Number: [phone]
Email: chris.tinklenberg(a,kimley-horn.com
200 South Tryon Street, Suite 200, Charlotte, NC 28202

WI
>OO�W A
��(;)b
�
oNiii�,c
Office Use Only:
Corps action ID no.
DWQ project no.
Form Version 1.3 Dec 10 2008
Page 1 of 12
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
Pre -Construction Notification (PCN) Form
A. Applicant Information
1.
Processing
1 a.
Type(s) of approval sought from the
Corps:
®Section 404 Permit El Section 10 Permit
1 b.
Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number: 27 or General Permit (GP) number:
1c.
Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps?
® Yes
❑ No
1 d.
Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply):
N 401 Water Quality Certification — Regular ❑ Non -404 Jurisdictional General Permit
❑ 401 Water Quality Certification — Express ❑ Riparian Buffer Authorization
1 e.
Is this notification solely for the record
because written approval is not required?
For the record only for DWQ 401
Certification:
❑ Yes ® No
For the record only for Corps Permit:
❑ Yes N No
1f.
Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for mitigation
of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank or in -lieu
fee program.
❑ Yes
® No
1g.
Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties. If yes, answer 1 h
below.
❑ Yes
N No
1 h.
Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)?
❑ Yes
N No
2.
Project Information
2a.
Name of project:
City View Stream Restoration Project
2b.
County:
Mecklenburg
2c.
Nearest municipality/ town:
Charlotte
2d.
Subdivision name:
N/A
2e.
NCDOT only, T.I.P. or state
project no:
N/A
3.
Owner Information
3a.
Name(s) on Recorded Deed:
Multiple Parcels (PID# 16504227 & 16507167)
3b.
Deed Book and Page No.
3c.
Responsible Party (for LLC if
applicable):
D
I
3d. Street address:
-
—inn
3e. City, state, zip:
3f.
Telephone no.:
Df9l, A:R!E:OUR
ES
3g.
Fax no.:
3h.
Email address:
Page 1 of 12
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

4.
Applicant Information (if different from owner)
4a. Applicant is:
❑ Agent ® Other, specify: Public Agency
4b.
Name:
Erin Shanaberger, WPIT
4c.
Business name
(if applicable):
Charlotte-Mecklenburg Storm Water Services
4d. Street address:
600 East Fourth Street
4e. City, state, zip:
Charlotte, NC 28202
4f.
Telephone no.:
704-562-2691
4g.
Fax no.:
4h.
Email address:
Erin. [e-mail]
5.
Agent/Consultant Information (if applicable)
5a.
Name:
Chris Tinklenberg, PWS
5b.
Business name
(if applicable):
Kimley-Horn and Associates
5c.
Street address:
200 South Tryon Street, Suite 200
5d. City, state, zip:
Charlotte, NC 28202
5e. Telephone no.:
704-409-1802
5f.
Fax no.:
5g.
Email address:
[e-mail]
Page 2 of 12
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

B.
Project Information and Prior Project History
1.
Property Identification
1a.
Property identification no. (tax PIN or parcel ID):
Multiple Parcels (PID# 16504227 & 16507167)
1 b.
Site coordinates (in decimal degrees):
Latitude: 35.179128 Longitude: - 80.747846
(DD.DDDDDD) (-DD.DDDDDD)
1c.
Property size:
1.48 acres (Limits -of -Disturbance)
2.
Surface Waters
2a.
Name of nearest body of water (stream, river, etc.) to
proposed project:
UT of Campbell Creek
2b. Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water:
Campbell Creek: 11-137-9-1, Class C
2c.
River basin:
Lower Catawba River Basin (HUC 03050103)
Page 3 of 12
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

3. Project Description
3a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this
application:
The project area is part of the City View Stream Mitigation Site and is contained within a conservation easement. Existing
land use in the vicinity of the project includes residential neighborhoods and commercial development.
On December 19, 2017, Kimley-Horn staff, Chris Tinklenberg, PWS, visited the site to verify the location and classification
of potentially jurisdictional waters within the project area. Kimley-Horn's field review of the project area identified three
potentially jurisdictional non -wetland waters. Streams 1 and 2 were classified as perennial streams, while Stream 3 was
classified as intermittent. Results of the site visit are depicted on Figure 4 PJD Field Sketch and representative
photographs of each feature are included in the project site photo pages.
No potentially jurisdictional wetland waters of the US were identified within the project area.
3b. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property:
0.18 ac
3c. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property:
1,340 If
3d. Explain the purpose of the proposed project:
The purpose of the project is to perform stream restoration activities necessary to repair failures along two reaches of an
unnamed tributary of Campbell Creek (City View Creek) within the City View Stream Mitigation Site, part of the City of
Charlotte's Stream and Wetland Mitigation Bank. Stream failures within the site require a full redesign of Reaches 1 and 3
in order to re -stabilize the stream reaches' bed and banks to provide the uplift to the aquatic environmental originally
intended.
3e. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
CMSWS performed stream restoration and enhancement along 1,908 linear feet of an unnamed tributary of Campbell
Creek in 2013 in order to provide uplift to the aquatic environmental while generating mitigation credits as part of the City
of Charlotte's Stream and Wetland Mitigation Bank. Since that time, CMSWS has identified two reaches within the
mitigation site that have demonstrated significant instabilities and failures which require a redesign of each reach.
A segmented channel rehabilitation approach will be used to create hydraulic and geomorphic functional uplift of the
project area and help the stream evolve to a more stable form. A combination rehabilitation approach—that includes
restoring profile and dimension at existing or slightly raised bed elevation—will be used for both reaches with some very
minor relocation and pattern adjustment (mostly to low flow; see attached Plan). Rehabilitation activities primarily will
focus on the creation of improved hydraulic geometry and improved bank angles. An active floodplain at the bankfull
elevation will be created where constraints allow. In addition, stable bank slopes, riffle -pool sequences (i.e., depth
variability), step -pools and buffers will be enhanced or restored. Improved hydraulic geometry (low flow, inner berms, and
flood prone) combined with an "active" floodprone bench (where feasible) will help reduce total suspended solids (TSS)
within the channel by eliminating the onsite source and providing a sediment sink. Point bars and inner -berms will also be
constructed for sediment deposition and to improve sediment competency. The inner berms also will serve to dissipate
stream velocities during the more frequent storms, which is especially important in an urban setting where the storm
events are flashy in nature.
The designed size of a floodplain bench will incorporate the ideal hydraulic geometry with newly sloped banks which will
seek to lower shear stress with the intent to reduce future bank erosion to natural levels (BEHI of low -to -moderate). The
stream profile is modified to create more local slope variability (i.e., steeper riffles and flat pools).
The existing buffers in the project area will be improved or restored if impacted through the addition of a mix of trees,
shrubs, and herbaceous species.
The proposed redesign will result in 1,222 If of stream, which results in a net loss of 118 If of waters of the US from
implementing natural channel design techniques to repair the reach and adjust the dimension, plan, and profile. The
previous design included a belt width typically associated with a meandering C-type channel which is not appropriate for
this setting. The redesign includes a smaller belt width associated with more of a step -pool system. This change is what
primarily resulted in the loss of the stream length. Track hoes and other earth moving equipment is anticipated to be used
on this project.
Page 4 of 12
PCN Form – Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

4. Jurisdictional Determinations
4a. Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the
Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property /
® Yes ❑ No ❑ Unknown
project (including all prior phases) in the past?
Comments: AJD; SAW -2012-0028
4b. If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination, what type
❑ Preliminary ® Final
of determination was made?
4c. If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas?
Agency/Consultant Company: S&ME
Name (if known): David Homans and Joey Lawler
Other:
4d. If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation.
January 2, 2013
5. Project History
5a. Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for
® Yes ❑ No ❑ Unknown
this project (including all prior phases) in the past?
5b. If yes, explain in detail according to "help file" instructions.
CMSWS has identified two reaches within the previously authorized mitigation site that have demonstrated instabilities
and failures which require a redesign and reworking of each reach.
6. Future Project Plans
6a. Is this a phased project?
❑ Yes ® No
6b. If yes, explain.
Page 5 of 12
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

C. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
1a. Which sections were completed below for your project (check all that apply):
❑ Wetlands ® Streams - tributaries ❑ Buffers
❑ Open Waters ❑ Pond Construction
2. Wetland Impacts
If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted.
2a.
2b.
2c.
2d.
2e.
2f.
Wetland impact
Type of jurisdiction
number —
Type of impact
Type of wetland
Forested
(Corps - 404, 10
Area of impact
Permanent (P)
(if known)
DWQ — non -404, other)
(acres)
or Temporary
T
W ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
W ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
W ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
2g. Total wetland impacts
2h. Comments:
3. Stream Impacts
If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this
question for all stream sites impacted.
3a.
3b.
3c.
3d.
3e.
3f.
3g.
Stream impact
Type of impact
Stream name
Perennial
Type of jurisdiction
Average
Impact
number -
(PER) or
(Corps - 404, 10
stream
length
Permanent (P)
intermittent
DWQ — non -404,
width
(linear
or Temporary
(INT)?
other)
(feet)
feet)
(T)
S1 -Impact 1
Stream restoration
S1 -UT to
® PER
® Corps
g
1235
® P ❑ T
activities
Campbell Creek
❑ INT
® DWQ
S2 -Impact 2
Stream restoration
S2 -UT
® PER
® Corps
g
41
❑ P ®T
activities
❑ INT
® DWQ
S3 -Impact 3
Stream restoration
S3 -UT
❑ PER
® Corps
4
64
® P ❑ T
activities
® INT
® DWQ
3h. Total stream and tributary impacts
1340
3i. Comments: The redesign proposes 1,222 If of restored stream length, which results in a net loss of 118 If of waters of the
US from implementing natural channel design techniques to repair the reach and adjust the dimension, plan, and profile. The
previous design included a belt width typically associated with a meandering C-type channel which is not appropriate for this
setting. The redesign includes a smaller belt width associated with more of a step -pool system. This change is what primarily
resulted in the loss of the stream length.
Page 6 of 12
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

4. Open Water Impacts
If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of
the U.S. then individually list all open water impacts below.
4a.
Open water
impact number
— Permanent
(P) or
Temporary T
4b.
Name of waterbody
(if applicable)
4c.
Type of impact
4d.
Waterbody type
4e.
Area of impact (acres)
01 ❑P❑T
02 ❑P❑T
03 ❑P
04 ❑P❑T
4L Total open water impacts
4g. Comments:
5. Pond or Lake Construction
If pond or lake construction proposed, then com tete the chart below.
5a.
Pond ID
number
5b.
Proposed use or purpose of
pond
5c.
Wetland Impacts (acres)
5d.
Stream Impacts (feet)
5e.
Upland
(acres)
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
Flooded
P1
P2
K Total
5g. Comments:
5h. Is a dam high hazard permit required?
❑ Yes ❑ No If yes, permit ID no:
5i. Expected pond surface area (acres):
5j. Size of pond watershed (acres):
5k. Method of construction:
Page 7 of 12
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

6. Buffer impacts (for DWQ)
If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below. If yes, then individually list all buffer impacts
below. If any impacts require mitigation, then you MUST fill out Section D of this form.
6a.
❑ Neuse ❑ Tar-Pamlico ❑ Other:
Project is in which protected basin?
❑ Catawba ❑ Randleman
6b.
6c.
6d.
6e.
6f.
6g.
Buffer impact
number —
Reason
Buffer
Zone 1 impact
Zone 2 impact
Permanent (P)
for impact
Stream name
mitigation
(square feet)
(square feet)
or Temporary
required?
T
El Yes
B1 ❑P❑T
❑ No
El Yes
B2 ❑P❑T
❑ No
El Yes
B3 ❑P❑T
❑ No
6h. Total buffer impacts
6i. Comments:
D. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
1a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project.
Impacts are limited only to the areas that have been identified in the annual mitigation monitoring reports as in need of repairs.
1 b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques.
To prevent sedimentation of downstream portions of the affected streams, construction will be conducted in the dry through
the use of coffer dams and pump-arounds. Temporary erosion and sediment control measures placed in waters will be
removed and the original grade restored upon completion of the project. Banks temporarily affected by maintenance work will
be matted, re-seeded and restored to stable bank conditions.
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for
❑ Yes ® No
impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State?
2b. If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply):
❑ DWQ ❑ Corps
❑ Mitigation bank
2c. If yes, which mitigation option will be used for this project? ❑ Payment to in-lieu fee program
❑ Permittee Responsible Mitigation
3. Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank
3a. Name of Mitigation Bank:
3b. Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter)
Type
Quantity
Page 8 of 12
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

3c. Comments:
4. Complete if Making a Payment to In -lieu Fee Program
4a. Approval letter from in -lieu fee program is attached.
❑ Yes
4b. Stream mitigation requested:
linear feet
4c. If using stream mitigation, stream temperature:
❑ warm ❑ cool ❑cold
4d. Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only):
square feet
4e. Riparian wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4f. Non -riparian wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4g. Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4h. Comments:
5. Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
5a. If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan.
6. Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) — required by DWQ
6a. Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires
buffer mitigation?
❑ Yes ® No
6b. If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation. Calculate the
amount of mitigation required.
Zone
6c.
Reason for impact
6d.
Total impact
(square feet)
Multiplier
6e.
Required mitigation
(square feet)
Zone 1
3 (2 for Catawba)
Zone 2
1.5
6f. Total buffer mitigation required:
6g. If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e.g., payment to private mitigation bank,
permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in -lieu fee fund).
6h. Comments:
Page 9 of 12
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

E. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ)
1. Diffuse Flow Plan
1 a. Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified
❑ Yes ® No
within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
1 b. If yes, then is a diffuse flow plan included? If no, explain why.
❑ Yes ❑ No
Comments:
2. Stormwater Management Plan
2a. What is the overall percent imperviousness of this project?
0%
2b. Does this project require a Stormwater Management Plan?
❑ Yes ® No
2c. If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why:
2d. If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan, then provide a brief, narrative description of the plan:
❑ Certified Local Government
2e. Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan?
❑ DWQ Stormwater Program
❑ DWQ 401 Unit
3. Certified Local Government Stormwater Review
3a. In which local government's jurisdiction is this project?
❑ Phase II
3b. Which of the following locally -implemented stormwater management programs
❑ NSW
EI USMP❑
apply (check all that apply):
Water Supply Watershed
❑ Other:
3c. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
❑ Yes ❑ No
attached?
4. DWQ Stormwater Program Review
❑ Coastal counties
❑ HQW
4a. Which of the following state -implemented stormwater management programs apply
❑ ORW
(check all that apply):
❑ Session Law 2006-246
❑ Other:
4b. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
❑ Yes ❑ No
attached?
5. DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review
5a. Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements?
❑ Yes ❑ No
5b. Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met?
❑ Yes ❑ No
Page 10 of 12
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

F.
Supplementary Information
1.
Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement)
1 a.
Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the
® Yes ❑ No
use of public (federal/state) land?
1 b.
If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an
environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State
❑ Yes ® No
(North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
1 c.
If you answered "yes" to the above, has the document review been finalized by the
State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval
❑ Yes ❑ No
letter.)
Comments:
2.
Violations (DWQ Requirement)
2a.
Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated
Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards,
❑ Yes ® No
or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B.0200)?
2b.
Is this an after -the -fact permit application?
❑ Yes ® No
2c.
If you answered "yes" to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s):
3.
Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement)
3a. Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in
❑ Yes ® No
additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?
3b.
If you answered "yes" to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the
most recent DWQ policy. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
4.
Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement)
4a. Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non -discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from
the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
Page 11 of 12
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or
❑ Yes ® No
habitat?
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act
❑ Yes ® No
impacts?
El Raleigh
5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted.
❑ Asheville
5d. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical
Habitat?
A copy of this application will be provided to the USFWS - Asheville Field Office. Field review of the project area did not
indicate the presence of habitat or endangered species listed for Mecklenburg County. The project area and vicinity are not
located in a Designated Critical Habitat. A review of the North Carolina Natural Heritage Program (NCNHP) database on
December 20, 2017 did not indicate known occurrences of threatened or endangered species within a 2 -mile radius of the
proposed project.
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat?
❑ Yes ® No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat?
NCNHP element occurrence database did not indicate the presence of EFH within the project boundary.
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal
governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation
❑ Yes ® No
status (e.g., National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in
North Carolina history and archaeology)?
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?
A review of the North Carolina State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO) HPOWEB GIS Service on December 20, 2017
indicated that there were no properties currently listed or determined eligible for listing in the National Register of Historic
Places within a one mile radius of the project.
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA -designated 100 -year floodplain?
❑ Yes ® No
8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements:
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination?
The proposed project will be constructed outside of the 100- ear FEMA floodplain. htt:// olaris.mecklenbur count nc. ov
STORMCharbtleMxkleM Erin Shanaberger
2017.12.27
WATER
12/27/2017
Erin Shanaberger, WPIT
Services 15:24:29 -05-00-
Date
Applicant/Agent's Signature
Applicant/Agent's Printed Name
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant
isprovided.)
Page 12 of 12
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

Figure 1
PA, Rorty" •:
L
Gh.arlorie
�i
�' �" t.i grit Hill
tl f.
0 5 10
R, , Hill ;.; Miles
rc
u
0
IiF�klertbun� a
Hi.th 2
ti.+sl�n tAsAAtaM my Ea8/eWOOd aft
Etiefm tor,-: r
cc afen,r
�} pr
a
I
Misl`f Way Ln c
C, Sunrise Ct
a' c
t
4 F.I.mogi— Ct
g
yunse4 GI'ase La
A.mty q/
Idlewild
R sprirygrry
d
Cedar SPr`n�s a6,
0
Idlev�H y o _
Ei=tn@nifiN n � `�_
Idi,
pyo ori
E�
0 tdlewud Rd cy'/
A'
C c
o , �, Lockmont Ur
r
�p04 p drk'/� � ''9r�pay 44 Creel
V
Rd
ttl Vrw "- 3'o C Sh, 1pt,�
f/ C as
.A
V err o''\�re. 4�esEp L'n pe�WppdF E
E
a
E
�
p
�
u
e/4i ppb Cv
/W
rn
b
�
G�
Ctty
Vic'
o
n
oa w
3
F
�Br
Btiyh`
� rard CfeE`e�
R
00 Stre
Fowtpr springs
d�s'oE at
a
o
y
In
�Pbetl
0
Creek
E
w
East In Dr
Co
ftY tee Or
Wallace Ln
6
r0 YnO
MaPtecrest Ui
r
Nr
hl ar
Idlewild
Fv g awn Saith
8e f
o6a 4
9P 4 0
EpI ESt a
�I00 La�ta Dr
n hs'
iE0 ��,4 Pre O
Legend
0 1,000 2,000
Project Boundary Feet
Figure 1: Vicinity
City View Stream Restoration
-- Kimley>Morn Charlotte, Mecklenburg County, NC
ENGINEERING &PROPERTY December 2017
MANAGEMENT

«
• r « t
4
> m .. 4 s t �y r • Y n m t • •} • • }• t
« c s Y
a#• _ t r • r i
4
«
}• `
M
v 4
ANN -
Ile OP 000!
• „„
41
Of
oe
#
x -
,kea '•
t h Sch
Forco+ }.
i to
1 Ory- � U i • i # • } } R • ♦ i � w if
v
#ww9s
w: r
} v �,�''V� }" mar • "°'ti. }•} t # } �t
k le•
}
•
Legend
ISO 1,000 2,000
Project Boundary . ` '`' • } Feet
Figure 2: USGS Topo (Charlotte East)
City View Stream Restoration
-- Kimley>Morn Charlotte, Mecklenburg County, NC
C,>LA> LWYE
December 2017
MANAGEMENT

N;�� " n
' r � City ��iw�•C�r � .�. �_
y .'moi,
��t
r z ��e
"�a
a�
r`.�y
35.�-�^4�� �; 1..T .
?-. ,� .✓"'.aye'
f e((
4*
(trn
SY('E
11MY11111
i
'o ,4 yds 54
ur
Legend
QProject Boundary
SSURGO Soils 74
•
Kimley>>Morn
utilit 1
MANAGFMFNT
D2
ami
v
f EnB
'F
F CeD2
CeB2 T
t
;t-Ililllo _J r SPI1
40,1
ane
"Marino C
r
P.W M O Y rd
J f
x � a,. �=�► � Map/ecres
a
0 400 800
o _ _MI == Feet
Figure 3: SSURGO Soils
Cite View Stream Restoration
Charlotte, Mecklenburg County, NC
December 2017

';� 4�r^_e«."�['.'r�T`.3�'."�F.-�''C•+�`�'-��"'}`��n�etili-1*L7.d...""�°f`����li�$� -�1'�
_
!"
!� "',�.
_
a
N
0'
Stream 1 y
UT to Campbell Creek
x.
)r;
Y
C
�
rQY_
�
crz r` Y
r i
-
JI
Stream 2
Rid9�`
0
75 150
-
Feet
r
I ,7 i
D'
! y View r.
C q ti A
� e1
'' - -
?.' = {
.ff Io, 3
1
0 E
GI/allace.RdINall-.., o`
Stream 1 �p
'7
74 UT to Campbell
�.,�;#r ., ►�� Creek 0 75 150
Feet
�
�F�, ,:.,r . 4 •cis a ` ��� 'fit <?1; a`' N�9h la t
xjF
Legend r d . • •-r _>�
toy t = + Laura`D
® Project Boundary ae� bra ti� w
'�ote� 0 300 600
Potential Non -Wetland WOUS a ° �f ', Feet
•
�rn Kiml >>>
(7I,RIOTTU ey Horn
MANAGEMENT
Figure 4: Preliminary JD Field Sketch
City View Stream Restoration
Charlotte, Mecklenburg County, NC
December 2017

a � �
r r ` ! e `4 ,• N
;. elwestone
._ o A
� 7
S
N
� n
�N'
s
� �� +� e,i I ilr�r+ t►P, x�'yi. fi _V �3 � , �f �� },
z .�p
s
City,fiewiDr E
t
A
rw
See Figure 5b
a Brighton
w
,
y. pgs
/`74� Book °n
lin
GO/d'-
o/dc ;
I Y� VV
• s�`,. �� � �
Orth
j-
j"`��
-�anno Ct"
IT-
7
_ k�j t
-� 'ty+ � � 4 : S 'k• i ,�• ' dee
Wallace Ln1
Legend �a r f�` 5, i l *wfj Maplecrest O�
Project Boundary
Proposed Centerline ' �G�` �'". '' �s#' �"� 0 200 400
— — — Existing Streams ,� << Feet
x..
•
Figure 5: Proposed Conditions
Kimley>>> Horn City View Stream Restoration
�� U1 ..1.�. Charlotte, Mecklenburg County, NC
FNGINFFNING& PROPERTY December 2017
MANA(.FMFN'I

. fi
S1 -impact 1
Stream Restoration Activities
�"�►
1,235 linear feet
Ok
S3 -Impact 3
Stream Restoration Activities, ,
64 linear feet
r
it G �§- # �q •s'
a �• �R
. S2 -Impact 2 �y ;
P Stream Restoration Activities
41 linear feet -
4
r
r
3 ,
I r
Q Project Boundary Bankfull Bench
o
® Vernal Pool Proposed Channel o�
® Channel Plugs Logvanes , _ 0 40 80
Feet
Constructed Riffles — — — Existing Streams
Figure 5a: REACH 1 Proposed Conditions
City View Stream Restoration
--- Kimley>Morn Charlotte, Mecklenburg County, NC
CIIARIA)TTE- December 2017
ENGINEERING A RRORERIY
MANAGFMFNT

Xvv
City View Dr
! c
XT
a t
y
:{4. `
S1-Imp �
>r
act 1
Stream Restoration Activities • •
1,235 linear feet
-:. C ... ., i ;.I `I �Y f �'. AFs 1. 1.... • l�wfi � '� 'i �I. �1 .• ' ! _. .. . ..
4
1
• .;1�;�C ries �1�! lam• .�@� - � .
4'$, .* { � � { 1 � fr*4 � �� �w�._'t; � f / \ r�4� � '� ti qy • I r
1 �,
Y t x ,r
t AIj'gg'� . _ "'*' f"' Ir tr ! ` , •,� F.^' °' '
rs !�r _
r t
�Iv
till
rv•
r
✓ r
Legend
Project Boundary Bankfull Bench r _
f`
b• r ;
Vernal Pool Proposed Channel
® Channel Plugs Logvanes
0 40 80
Constructed Riffles — — — Existing Streams r/ Feet
•
Figure 5b: REACH 3 Proposed Conditions
Kimley>>> Horn City View Stream Restoration
CHARLOTTE_ Charlotte, Mecklenburg
+ County, NC
ENGINEERING A PROPERTY December 2017
MANAGEMENT

INDEX OF SHEETS PE SEAL
CoverSheet.................................................................................. C-1.011n114111II
General Notes and Stream Legend ............................................. C-2.0 3�01N CARD(+y+
?O pd'y
Typical Sections ............................................................. C-3.0 to C-3.1 ftss/e
ne �
s
Plan & Profile................................................................ C-4.0 to C-4.2 - - z
Grading Plan................................................................. C-4.3 to C-4.4 lot
l NEt o03$
Details............................................................................. C-5.1 to C-5.5 i J� CLA1�.x',`'.
Dec 13 IL�/ 5:17 PM
VegetationNotes.......................................................................... C-6.1
Cross Sections................................................................ C-7.1 to C-7.3 ENGINEERING & PROPERTY
MANAGEMENT Record Drawings
TOT.ALSHEETS 18
VICINITY MAP
NTS
i
SURVEY PREPARED BY:
JAMES MAUNEY & ASSOCIATES, P.A.
PROFESSIONAL Sl: R V EVORS
6405 WILKINSON BLVD., SUITE 11- BELMONT, NC 28012
TEL: [phone] - FAX: [phone]
LICENSE NO. C-2373
PLANS PREPARED BY:
■
Kim ey)O Horn©2ot7
NC LICENSE #F-0102
200 South Tryon Street Suite 200
Charlotte, North Carolina 28202
Phone: [phone]
DP. A!`u 1
Construction Plans of Proposed
City View Stream Repair
Project Features:
Stream Restoration
Riparian Planting
REACH 3
2012 STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS
LOCATION MAP
NTS
GRAPHIC SCALES
RECOMMENDED 1
I FOR CONSTRUCTION I
Contract Administration
Storm Water Construction
Landscape Management
CDOT - Design
CDOT- Implementation
Charlotte Water
Water Project Manager
CONVENTIONAL SIGNS
New Property Line.........................................—
V
40
60
PlanView .................
Existing Structures .........................................
Railroad Tracks..............................................
20
40
60
Horz. Profile ............
SlopeStake Line ............................................. — G F
—
Temporary Construction Easement ............. e
20
40
60
Vert. Profile .............
SOE—
ExistingGas Line ........................................... c
c —
Existing Water Line ....................................... W
20
40
60
Cross Section ...........
UT
Existing Underground Electric ..................... uE
UE —
RECOMMENDED 1
I FOR CONSTRUCTION I
Contract Administration
Storm Water Construction
Landscape Management
CDOT - Design
CDOT- Implementation
Charlotte Water
Water Project Manager
CONVENTIONAL SIGNS
New Property Line.........................................—
ExistingProperty Line ................................... —
Maintained as WW Line................................--+�— — —
Existing Structures .........................................
Railroad Tracks..............................................
Proposed Edge of Pavement ..........................
Fence................................................................ x
SlopeStake Line ............................................. — G F
—
Temporary Construction Easement ............. e
e —
Sidewalk Utility Easement ............................ —SUE
SUE
StormDrainage Easement ............................ SDE
SOE—
ExistingGas Line ........................................... c
c —
Existing Water Line ....................................... W
w —
Existing Sanitary Sewer ................................ ss
ss —
Existing Underground Telecommunications UT
UT
Existing Underground Electric ..................... uE
UE —
f
Existing Storm Drainage ...............................
ProposedStorm Drainage .............................
ExistingTree..........................................................................................
0
WM
ExistingWater Meter.............................................................................
❑
Existing Water Valve.............................................................................
W
Pa
Existing Gas Valve.................................................................................
GV
oa
Existing Sanitary Sewer Manhole.........................................................0
ProposedSanitary Sewer Manhole.......................................................0
ExistingStorm Drain Manhole.............................................................0
Proposed Storm Drain Manhole...........................................................�
ExistingTelephone Manhole.................................................................0
Proposed Telephone Manhole...............................................................0
Existing Electric Manhole.....................................................................0
ProposedElectric Manhole...................................................................
Existing Catch Basin..............................................................................8
Proposed Catch Basin............................................................................�
ExistingLight Pole.................................................................................
#
Proposed Light Pole................................................................................
ExistingUtility Pule................................................................................
0.
GuyWire............................................................................................ —<
Proposed Utility Pole..............................................................................
VL
Iron Pin.................................................................................................... 0
Existing Fire Hydrant............................................................................ .6
ProposedFire Hydrant..........................................................................
ExistingDrop Inlet..................................................................................L-J
Proposed Drop Inlet................................................................................
Accessible Ramp...................................................................................®
TreeProtection.............................................................................
Proposed Guardrail ...................................................................
_
SiltFence.....................................................................................
Proposed Curb & Gutter, Cone. Drive, Sidewalk ...................
Proposed Asphalt Pavement ................ .................................... ....�
ProposedRip Rap Ditch..............................................................
ProposedGravel .. . .......................................................................
Proposed Pavement Removal......................................................®
Proposed Sidewalk Bridging Tree Roots ........... I ......................
Bid Set No.
ENGINEERING & PROPERTY
MANAGEMENT
APPROVED
CITY ENGINEER DATE

GENERAL NOTES GENERAL NOTES ABBREVIATIONS
ABAND............................ABANDONED MTL........................... METAL I
1:,l -k N(' F : A.D.................................ALGEBRAIC DIFFERENCE N.-.- .......................... NORTH/NORTHING
ASPH ................-............ASPHALT NTS .................. ........NOT TO SCALE
THE CONTRACTOR SHALL SET AND ADJUST PROPOSED CURB ELEVATIONS AS NECESSARY TO STRUCTURES INCLUDING STORM DRAIN PIPE, STORM STRUCTURES, SEWER PIPE, AND RETAINING APPROX..........................APPROXIMATELY O/H.- ....................... OVER HEAD
ENSURE PROPER LONGITUDINAL GRADE FOR DRAINAGE. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL RETAIN WALLS SHALL HAVE A TOLERANCE OF *0,10 FEET. STRUCTURES INCLUDING RISERS, WEIRS, B/C.................................BACK OF CURB OC ..................... ...-.-.ON CENTER
a EXISTING PAVEMENT, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. AND ORIFICES, SHALL HAVE A TOLERANCE OF *0.05 FEET. BIT...................................BITUMINOUS OTCB .................. OPEN THROAT CATCH BASIN
s BM...................................BENCH MARK PAVT........................ PAVEMENT
sDRI F %W _ vC AN- � PFW " I <c: STREAM IMPROVEMENT STRUCTURES SHALL HAVE A VERTICAL TOLERANCE OF *0.10 FEET, BRG.................................BEARING PC_ .............. ........_POINT OF CURVATURE
}� AND A PLANIMETRIC TOLERANCE OF *0.50 FEET, CB.. .................................CATCH BASIN PERM....... ................. PERMANENT
PROPOSED DRIVEWAY ENTRANCE DIMENSIONS ARE FROM EXPANSION JOINT TO EXPANSION �. �. _ _ _ C&G................................CURB AND GUTTER PG. .......... _PACE = H
JOINT. MATCH REPLACEMENT MATERIALS TO THE EXISTING SURFACE ACCORDINGLY: ,I, !.I CL...................................CLEARANCE PI ............................. POINT OF INT
♦
CUR .................................CLEAR PK ............................ PK NAIL SET
CONCRETE - SIX INCH PORTLAND CEMENT CONCRETE (3600 PSI). OO! oo Ne
H1 ASPHALT C/L FENCE.....................CHAIN LINK FENCE PP............................POWER POLE r n
(COMMERCIAL TWO INCH SF9.5B COURSE AND FOUR INCH 119.OB LIMITS OF PROPOSED SLOPES ARE INDICATED IN THE PLANS, DETAILS AND STANDARD ev
3, ) CMP................................CORRUGATED MTL PIPE PROP...................,....PROP.
s INTERMEDIATE COURSE. DRAWINGS. THE MAXIMUM SLOPE SHALL NOT EXCEED A 3:1 (HORIZONTAL TO VERTICAL) CONC..............................CONCRETE PSE .......................... PERM SW ESMT o a
.y RESIDENTAL TWO INCH SF9.5B COURSE AND FOUR INCH AGGREGATE UNLESS DESIGNATED BY THE ENGINEER, A CUT SLOPE OF 2:1 MAXIMUM WILL BE USED ONLY PT............................POINT OF TANGENCY
( l CONST............................CONSTRUCTION m
AS DIRECTED BY THE ENGINEER, cq
s BASE (ABC) COURSE. DB..................................DEED BOOK PVI........................... POINT OF VERT INT � d
u
am # GRAVEL - SIX INCH INCIDENTAL STONE DCB................................DOUBLE CB PUE .......................... PERM UTILITY ESMT a °i
.......DROP INLET r...............................RADIUS m r`
_ SIDEWALK SHALL BE FOUR INCHES THICK, AND SIX INCHES THICK AT DRIVEWAY CROSSINGS, -" MI.- .......................... ° e t E
PER CITY STD, NO. 10.22.
DIA_ ................................DIAMETER RT.,................ -.-.......RIGHT M` \ Z o
THE CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL AND MAINTAIN EROSION CONTROL DEVICES IN DW..................................DRIVEWAY RCP ........... ...............REINFORCED CONIC PIPE /� ,y �• ••
ACCORDANCE WITH THE APPROPRIATE CITY AND STATE EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL DIM.................................DIMENSION RELOC..................._RELOCATE a /�� U E" Z
a UNI1\ UL _ I -U;, I Lam: .3 Y/
ORDINANCES AND CHARLOTTE STORM WATER SERVICES RGP #163/GC 14100 OR /E R/W ..........................RIGHT OF WAY a U r i
E.....................................EAST ASTING
APPLICABLE PERMIT DOCUMENT. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PREVENT STANDING WATER DUE S...............................SOUTH
GRADES, ELEVATIONS AND LOCATIONS SHOWN ARE APPROXIMATE. AS DIRECTED BY THE EA...................................EACH
� ENGINEER, THEY MAY BE ADJUSTED TO ACCOMMODATE UNFORESEEN CONDITIONS. STATIONS, TO CONSTRUCTION. DISTURBED AREAS SHALL BE SEEDED AND MULCHED AT THE ELEV................................ELEVATION SD ............................ STORM DRAIN � L
OFFSETS AND ELEVATIONS REFER TO THE CENTER OF DROP INLETS, MANHOLES AND JUNCTION DIRECTION OF THE ENGINEER. EOP.................................EDGE OF PAVEMENT SF ............................ SQUARE FOOT r U
d BOXES, AND THE MIDPOINT OF THE LIP FOR CATCH BASINS, ALL PIPES SHALL BE RCP CLASS ESMT__ ........... EASEMENT S/R FENCE.. ............. SPLIT RAIL FENCE ■ `M`111111
III, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. EXIST..............___.,.........EXIST. SS ............................ SANITARY SEWER
WEEPHOLES ARE TO BE CONSTRUCTED IN ALL DRAINAGE STRUCTURES, A MINIMUM OF 1 Rn1AF7 "ND F)F-IR-_1 7F7
EX..................................E%IST. STA .......................... STATION
WEEPHOLE PER STRUCTURE. WEEPHOLES ARE TO BE CONSTRUCTED IN THE BOTTOM 1/3 OF F/C.................................FACE OF CURB STD..........................STANDARD
6 .
STRUCTURE AND COVERED ON THE OUTSIDE OF THE STRUCTURE BY A BAG MADE OF FILTER THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONSTRUCT 6 -INCH THICK CONCRETE ACCESSIBLE CURB RAMPS AT FES.................................FLARED END SECTION SW ...........................SIDEWALK
FABRIC AND FILLED W/17B STONE. THERE WILL BE NO SEPARATE PAYMENT FOR THIS WORK. INTERSECTIONS IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE LATEST REVISIONS FOR ACCESSIBLE CURB RAMP FH...................................FIRE HYDRANT TAN ......................... .TANGENT
°m TB............................TRAFFIC BEARING
1, FOC.................................FIBER OPTIC CABLE
V � _ _ DETAILS, "PROPOSED ACCESSIBILITY GUIDELINES FOR PEDESTRIAN FACILITIES IN THE PUBLIC TCE ...........................TEMP CONST ESMT
r. GV..................................GAS VALVE
c � I TI I I " �. RIGHT-OF-WAY" (PROWAG). CONSTRUCTION PLANS & NCDOT STANDARD DRAWINGS. HORI Z..............................HORIZONTAL TEMP ........................ TEMPORARY 'o
°+ INT................................INTERSECTION TP.,............ --,........... TRAVERSE POINT E
E g UTILITIES ARE ILLUSTRATED FOR INFORMATION PURPOSES ONLY. THE CITY WILL NOT B - IE HELD N VI .0 N V _ \ I - L - L + v I I N
:. NV....................................INVERT T/W ......................... TEST WIRE _
RESPONSIBLE FOR THE ACCURACY OF UTILITY LOCATIONS, SIZES DEPTHS OR FOR IP....................................IRON PIN SET TYP.......................... TYPICAL PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION AND VIA THE CITY UTILITY COORDINATOR AND CITY INSPECTORTHE .k-
0 8 COMPLETENESS OF UTILITY INFORMATION. c
c 8 401/404 JURISDICTIONAL AREA(S) HAVE BEEN PERMITTED UNDER CHARLOTTE STORM WATER JB...................................JUNCTION BOX U/G..........................UNDER GROUND
,
5+ I CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY AND MEET WITH ALL UTILITIES AFFECTED TO DETERMINE UTILITY SERVICES RGP /}163/GC )}4100, OR APPLICABLE PERMIT DOCUMENT. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL L......................................LENGTH VC ........................ ....VERTICAL CURVE
a 6 LOCATIONS. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROTECT ALL UTILITIES FROM DAMAGE CAUSED BY HIS FOLLOW ALL APPLICABLE PERMIT REQUIREMENTS. LF....................................LINEAR FOOTAGE VERT. ................... .....VERTICAL
R OPERATIONS OR THOSE OF HIS AGENTS. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL HOLD THE CITY HARMLESS LT....................................LEFT W. ............................. WEST
E FOR ANY THIRD -PARTY INCONVENIENCE CREATED BY WORK OF HIS OWN FORCES OR THAT OF BY CITY ORDINANCE, THE DISCHARGE OF STORMWAER POLLUTANTS TO THE STORM WATER Ib....................................POUND W/., .. WITH
° - SYSTEM OR WATER BODIES IS PROHIBITED. LPM4 ..........
POLE WM-....-.-...................WATER METER
N S HIS AGENTS. ANY DAMAGES INCURRED SHALL BE THE CONTRACTORS FINANCIAL MAX.................................MAXIMUM W VAULT..................WATER VAULT
6 RESPONSIBILITY. MIN..................................MINIMUM WV ......... ................. WATER VALVE
-�" AS NEEDED, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL ADJUST/RELOCATE THE SANITARY SEWER AND WATER SAV',-r.I-I T`_+: MH_ ............ ............. MANHOLE 60p .......... SIXTY PENNY NAIL SET
r - LINES ONLY. ADJUSTMENTS/RELOCATIONS WILL BE PERFORMED BY THE VARIOUS
g ALL OTHER ADJUSTMENTS /R MONO..............................MONOLITHIC '...............................FOOT
o £ UTILITY OWNERS. VIA THE CITY UTILITY COORDINATOR AND CITY INSPECTOR, THE CONTRACTOR THE CONTRACTOR SHALL SAWCUT EXISTING ASPHALT AND/OR CONCRETE SURFACES PRIOR mph................................MILES PER HOUR •• _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ,-.....INCH
SHALL COORDINATE WORK WITH UTILITY OWNERS SO AS NOT TO ADVERSELY AFFECT THE TO REMOVAL UNLESS OTHERWISE DIRECTED BY THE ENGINEER. SAW CUT WIDTH SHALL BE • "- "-"'-"•
,i E PROJECT SCHEDULE. THE CITY WILL NOT BE HELD RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY DELAYS OR 1 FOOT MINIMUM FROM THE EXISTING EDGE OF PAVEMENT. SAW CUT PAVEMENT SHALL BE
3 DISRUPTIONS TO THE WORK SCHEDULE OF OTHER UTILITY OWNERS. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REPLACED AS WELL AS ADDITIONAL PAVEMENT REWIRED TO TIE-IN TO FACE OF
o s STAY A MINIMUM OF 5 FEET AWAY FROM ALL UTILITY POLES. PROPOSED cuRe AND GUTTER. PROPOSED STREAM PLAN LEGEND PROPOSED STREAM PROFILE LEGEND
A FOR UTILITY LOCATES CALL NORTH CAROLINA ONE -CALL ® 1-800-632-4949.
Z O WARNING: OVERHEAD UTILITIES. UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED FOR RELOCATION. THE F -A LN L\ ULhKA_rr HUN --L:
w CONTRACTOR IS TO WORK UNDER ALL EXISTING OVERHEAD UTILITIES. 103
COOT HAS DETERMINED THAT NO PAVEMENT DEGRADATION FEE IS TO BE ASSESSED. PROPOSED STREAM CENTERLINE --- ---- EXISTING GROUND ATTHE �T�alnanvT,
z. xE VAULTSNTOACTOR FINSH DHALL GRADEJUST ALL WA ER METERR VALVES, S LOCATED NTSIDEWALKSMETER BORES AND CONCRETVE DRIVEWAYS ATER LDOT FEEE ISAND E&PM REQURED.HAVE AGREED ON E DEGRADATIONHFEETASSESSMENTEET CUTS FOR SHALL(CH A BE PAID VIAENTERNALNT ADCTYON PROPOSED CENTERLINE � �H,N C4pO'f�"
wo SHALL BE INSTALLED WITHIN CONCRETE BOXES. MECHANISMS (DTI) PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. B PROPOSED STREAM BANKFULL
p " GAS LINES WILL BE ADJUSTED/RELOCATED AS NEEDED BY PIEDMONT NATURAL GAS. VIA THEPROPOSED CHANNEL BOTTOM a SFA(
Z ° CITY UTILITY COORDINATOR AND CITY INSPECTOR, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT PIEDMONT - : FP PROPOSED BACK OF FLOODPLAIN BENCH
o 111 rc NATURAL GAS AT LEAST TWO WEEKS PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. TRAF— — — — — — — PROPOSED BANKFULL s 4sIMEEO Or'
Q �' " V �'- 1 AREAFITRAOFICRCON TROLOL LHANoO HABE IN NDBOOK-
ACCORDANCE WITH THE MOST CURRENT EDITION OF THE "WORK _ _ _ PROPOSED STREAM TOE OF SLOPE p F4Icil'o"
a F �I'l IIN", NI I RY UHF + "ND G1 IF � 11\ l-
o THE CONTRACTOR SHALL USE CARE WHEN WORKING AROUND SANITARY SEWERS AND WATER C/F—C/F PROPOSED CUT/FILL LINE PROPOSED LOG SILL Dec 13 2017 5:17 PM
w § LINES. SHOULD THE CONTRACTOR DAMAGE EXISTING SEWER OR WATER LINES, HE SHALL ,�-F iN(i AN ) LI �" ," H\,;.
w € IMMEDIATELY REPLACE THE LINE AT HIS EXPENSE WITH DUCTILE IRON PIPE. THE CONTRACTOR
a SHALL REPLACE SANITARY SEWER AND/OR WATER LINE. WITH A MINIMUM TEN FOOT SECTION DISTURBED AREAS SHALL BE SEEDED AND MULCHED OR MATTED WTHIN 14 CALENDAR DAYS PROPOSED VARIABLE
o OF DUCTILE IRON PIPE WHEN DRAINAGE PIPE COMES WITHIN TWO FEET OF SAID LINES,
Z FOLLOWING COMPLETION OF ANY PHASE OR GRADING. PERIMETER AREAS AND SLOPES GREATER CONSTRUCTED RIFFLE
b VERTICALLY OR HORIZONTALLY. THAN 3:1 SHALL BE SEEDED AND MULCHED OR MATTED WITHIN 7 CALENDAR DAYS FOLLOWINGPROPOSED LOG SILULOG STEP
_ COMPLETION OF ANY PHASE OF GRADING. ESTABLISH TEMPORARY VEGETATION AS NEEDED TO
#$ J�RFPC, E PLA\ CONTROL SEDIMENT RUNOFF (NCDOT SECTIONS 1615 & 1620). ESTABLISH PERMANENT 0 PROPOSED LOG VANE
Z iL _ VEGETATION IN ACCORDANCE WITH NCOOT SECTION 1660 AND CHARLOTTE LANDSCAPE "
oI F NO SUBSURFACE PLANS ARE AVAILABLE ON THIS PROJECT, THE CONTRACTOR MAY MAKE CONSTRUCTION STANDARDS MANUAL - SECTION 04200.
PROPOSED LOG VANE p,- <
HIS OWN INVESTIGATION TO DETERMINE SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS,w M °
y a THIS SEEDING SPECIFICATION SHALL BE USED FOR GRASSING ALL DISTURBED AREAS WITHIN THE / PROPOSED ROCK STEP a =
PROJECT LIMITS THAT DO NOT CALL OUT FOR SPECIAL SEEDING OR MEASURES ALONG THE
u = N " L = LI " L =: CHANNEL BANKS.
c °
THE CONTRACTOR SHALL RELOCATE ALL MAIL BOXES AS REQUIRED BY SECTION 107-11 OF THE r - - r = - \ PROPOSED ROCK TOE PROTECTION
i 8 NCDOT STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR ROADS AND STRUCTURES. COORDINATE THIS WORK WITH J_CDINC,S.. I _DI_ __:
THE U.S. POSTAL SERVICE.
° s SEEDING SCHEDULE SHALL FOLLOW SECTION 04200 - SEEDING AND SODDING TURFGRASS OF -
i THE CHARLOTTE LANDSCAPE CONSTRUCTION STANDARDS MANUAL. UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED IN PROPOSED ROCK STEP
- F= N � 1 ,`
y a THIS PLAN SET. x
r 3
THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REMOVE AND RESET FENCES AS NOTED ON THE PLANS AND/OR AS
DIRECTED BY THE ENGINEER. PROPOSED CONSTRUCTED RIFFLE
14-S �Hk_H3 . STANDARDS
6 THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REMOVE TREES, SHRUBS, AND HEDGES WITHIN THE OF DISTURBANCE
oo
S UNLESS SHOWN ON THE PLANS TO BE PROTECTED AND THOSE THAT FALL *THIN
THE TREE PROTECTION PROPOSED VARIABLE CONSTRUCTED RIFFLE
° BARRIERS THE CONTRACTOR SHALL ALSO PROTECT TREES AND SHRUBS OUTSIDE OF CUT/FILL LINES IN THE FOLLOWING STANDARDS AND THE LATEST REVISION THERETO ARE APPLICABLE
ADDITION TO THOSE THAT RECEIVE TREES/SHRUB PROTECTION BARRIERS. WHEN ROOT PRUNING IS TO THIS PROJECT AND BY REFERENCE ARE CONSIDERED A PART OF THESE PLANS. i/]
NECESSARY, CUT ROOTS CLEANLY USING A DISC TRENCHER OR OTHER APPROVED METHOD IN ACCORDANCE
B NCDOT STANDARDS SHALL BE USED. CHARLOTTE LAND DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS jra
6 WITH SECTION 01000 OF THE CITY OF CHARLOTTE LANDSCAPE CONSTRUCTION STANDARDS- PRUNING
i SHALL BE PER THE LATEST BE USED IF THERE IS NOT AN APPLICABLE NCDOT STANDARD.FF,—,7-v—, v v
ST STANDARD OF THE LANDSCAPE CONSTRUCTION STANDARDS MANUAL (TYP.) (~ O
a USE PLYWOOD FORMS WHEN TREE ROOTS ARE ADJACENT TO PROPOSED CURB & GUTTER OR SDEWALK, avav PROPOSED TOE WOOD 3 z I
N� LI O
m USE CLD STD. 40.11 FOR BRIDGING TREE ROOTS. TREES SPECIFIED BY THE PLANS TO HAVE ASPHALT - W
$. ovvv
o y� CURBING MUST USE CLD SRT. 40.13. TREE PROTECTION SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WTH CLD STD. 40.02
'O AND WTH SECTION 1000 OF THE CITY OF CHARLOTTE LANDSCAPE CONSTRUCRON STANDARDS. WHEN THE STD, NO., TITLE.
'
'g TREE IS CLOSE TO THE WORK AREA TREE PROTECTION CLD STD. 40.12 SHALL BE USED. 840.01 ................... BRICK CATCH BASIN L
840.03 ..............__ FRAME, GRATES, AND HOOD PROPOSED RIP RAP
a B CONTRACTOR SHALL OBTAIN APPROVAL FROM THE CITY PRIOR TO REMOVING ANY TREES IN ADDITION, I�1
ALL TREES LOCATED "THIN THE LOD THAT ARE TO REMAIN AFTER CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE INSPECTED
= BE THE CITY TO VERIFY THEY ARE SUITABLE TO REMAIN. - HA R - __F: U
U S W
� FOLLO"NG CONSTRUCTION STAKING THE PROJECT TEAM (CONTRACTOR, CITY INSPECTOR, CITY ARBORIST STD. NO.: TITLE Gi
Y AND CONSULTANT, IF APPLICABLE) WILL HOLD AN ON-STE MEETING TO ENSURE THE LIMITS W PROPOSED CHANNEL PLUG
DISTURBANCE AND THAT TREES PROPOSED FOR PROTECTION ARE CLEARLY IDENTIFIED. THE TEAM WLL 10.17A ................... 2'-6" CURB AND GUTTER
E $ WALK THE PROJECT AREA AND AGREE ON THE TREES TO BE PROTECTED AND THOSE TO REMOVE. DISCUSS 10,19 2'-6 CURB AND GUTTER TRANSITION
° PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES, AND IDENTIFY ANY ADDITIONAL TREES TO PROTECT THAT WERE NOT 10.22 ..................... CONCRETE SIDEWALKS
c ORIGINALLY MARKED AS SUCH. THE CONTRACTOR WILL BE GIVEN APPROVAL FOR TREE REMOVAL, IN 10.25A .................. RESIDENTIAL DROP CURB TYPE I DRIVEWAY WITH PLANTING STRIP
WRITING• AFTER APPROPRIATE TREE PROTECTION HAS BEEN INSTALLED AND BEFORE ANY CLEARING OR (2'-6" CURB AND GUTTER)
REMOVAL CAN BEGIN.
o 30.14 ................... TEMPORARY STREAM CROSSING PROPOSED FLOODPLAIN DEPRESSION - O
00THERE WILL BE NO ADDITIONAL PAYMENT FOR TREE PROTECTION INSTALLED AROUND ADDITIONAL TREES 30.20 ..................... EMBANKMENT MATTING - N
IN IDENTIFIED FOR PROTECTION. 40,02 __................. TREE PROTECTION DETAIL '~
THE CONTRACTOR ASSUMES RESPONSIBILITY FOR 'IN-KIND' REPLACEMENT OF TREES DAMAGED THAT HAVE
BEEN MARKED FOR PROTECTION OR NOT MARKED FOR REMOVAL. �•/

name: K:\CHL-PRJ\015016 City of Charlotte\181 City View\Cadd\Plan Sheets\40-PLAN AND PROFILE.dwg C-4.0 PLAN AND PROFILE Dec 13, 2017 1; 08pm by. noncy.mancuso
Ihcl9stl^°N6R29"° Swl•Rt ;RM dsey^vie"M='LMr88e!^c°vro ^IrtAq•MNb•PR®Fk�"t•IN!leiMeir h3, A7?9NM o°Oa!08^671A4t 1> w^�tNL•�noNarShce•cay°e0t harervarfLl•C161^°clMf^Ik'WlR1d1iBCP16HIS11!!l9^Y46�L99t ^MPbliwnFrl4e+.vWU°'" ^^a A•.xl•teA IM..nmi a runwt amour 1° K�mmr-s.�• -a A..od°la m..
�4
r --'>r-----
K"
ai
1/ l
i \\N
111 I m �� l Illll
II �I I I 11
I I � ; *i �l l l 1 1' I •^
\iii/Ili �' I �I I L' - c4 / � liiiliiii Its/
% IiIi Ili ii
-
/,�///
i\\In\\\
JF \ 1 \ \ I IIII
\ rn `\ \ \ \ T \ n III I I n 1
m illllliln I
CJI
I\ m I II II l
at, /I II i 11 n IIIIIII^ v
if
N-11
0;ZmA / /\ /
I �� I / / / I I I I I I I I I
Do
) 111111 ID 1 )
Zm �9 I I / IIII III 1 /
'm-°�AAi)o I 1
I )(1 lX� � I I I) 11
)zo) In 1 I IIII I I / m �i I III I
/ z 1 0I i 11� 1 II`\ I <a IIIIIII I
\\m t\ Im1II\ II °< 11 1 �� I IIII I I I II
It(
\\\ \\ \\k \I 1 1\Iv \ \ \ m
\� \1\ II III II II I I
1 1 II I II
I\�\1' 2, II I II II II IIII II II
1
,� mew , 11 1111 I I` �\ 1111111 � 11 1 11
In
III11
I l
� n I,� 1T I1 111111 \ /1
\ I\\ I I 111LJ
11111111
xy w ^\�� " 11 111111111fl
1j1it� < I
(/ Eg>Fn)'
x C)
I 1
It J
it
\\ I IOD
f
000woo
"s 3* Z
1
l33 Nw o
�m =
Q�kCJ� z
m
A�
O
O
O
0
O
0
N
+
O
N
0
W
O
W
+
0
A
0
A
0
015016181
JOB NO.
x
H/N'qi
S0. DATE BY DESCRIPTION
Plans Prepared By:
V
C-4°0
CITY VIEW
w a�t4 A9
NST ! ��
_ - s
O �n �• m cr_
u, 5 d' c
, o F
.
Kirk ey})> Horn
NC LICENSE NO. F-0102
�\
CAD FII.F. PATH
----------
--------
---
-
`
PKLPARLD BY
r --'>r-----
K"
ai
1/ l
i \\N
111 I m �� l Illll
II �I I I 11
I I � ; *i �l l l 1 1' I •^
\iii/Ili �' I �I I L' - c4 / � liiiliiii Its/
% IiIi Ili ii
-
/,�///
i\\In\\\
JF \ 1 \ \ I IIII
\ rn `\ \ \ \ T \ n III I I n 1
m illllliln I
CJI
I\ m I II II l
at, /I II i 11 n IIIIIII^ v
if
N-11
0;ZmA / /\ /
I �� I / / / I I I I I I I I I
Do
) 111111 ID 1 )
Zm �9 I I / IIII III 1 /
'm-°�AAi)o I 1
I )(1 lX� � I I I) 11
)zo) In 1 I IIII I I / m �i I III I
/ z 1 0I i 11� 1 II`\ I <a IIIIIII I
\\m t\ Im1II\ II °< 11 1 �� I IIII I I I II
It(
\\\ \\ \\k \I 1 1\Iv \ \ \ m
\� \1\ II III II II I I
1 1 II I II
I\�\1' 2, II I II II II IIII II II
1
,� mew , 11 1111 I I` �\ 1111111 � 11 1 11
In
III11
I l
� n I,� 1T I1 111111 \ /1
\ I\\ I I 111LJ
11111111
xy w ^\�� " 11 111111111fl
1j1it� < I
(/ Eg>Fn)'
x C)
I 1
It J
it
\\ I IOD
f
000woo
"s 3* Z
1
l33 Nw o
�m =
Q�kCJ� z
m
A�
O
O
O
0
O
0
N
+
O
N
0
W
O
W
+
0
A
0
A
0
SHEET
015016181
JOB NO.
AS NOTED
SCALE.
H/N'qi
S0. DATE BY DESCRIPTION
Plans Prepared By:
•
C-4°0
CITY VIEW
w a�t4 A9
NST ! ��
_ - s
O �n �• m cr_
u, 5 d' c
, o F
.
Kirk ey})> Horn
NC LICENSE NO. F-0102
TIE TO EXISTIN
CAD FII.F. PATH
PKLPARLD BY
CHUCKLUBY
O 9 1�
PLAN AND PROFILE
%.�'o/ 9 �s:'
200 South Tryon Street, Suite 200
CRAM,
JCD
12/11/=7h�Y.
3
18
•HINI••r�
Charlotte, North Carolina 28202
STA=9+88.36
APPROVEDBr
UAIE
Ph- [phone]
7.71
I
Ix
BECIN VARIABLECONSTRUCTED RIFFLE
BEGIN
STA=10+07.98
I
ELEV=708.00
TA,10
14.9
ELEV:7
7.9
TA: 10+
1.9
V:70
A 10+1
.7
8.9
".70
'.6
s
Ato+
.8
V 70
5
\E
_S11:1-411
M.707
\
ST
:10+49
7
V. 707.
K10+56.
10+63.
706.9
0+70.
706.8
\:706.8
END
VARIABLE
CONSTRUCTED
RIFFLE
I
/ROCK
STEP
STA=10+84.16
I
I
El F1=706
BEGIN CONSTRUCTED RIFFL
I
I
STA=11+09.08
I
I
ELEV=706.30
I
END CONSTRUCTED RIFFLE/ROCK STEP
STA=11+22.78
ELEV=706.00
1>,
1
/
I
/
BEGIN CONSTRUCTED
RIFFLE/LOG SILL
//
STA=11+60.28
/
ELEV=705.80
L
1
I
END CONSTRUCTED RIFFLE/LOG VANE
STA=11+71.96
I
ELEV=705.60
U
I„
\I
I
BEGIN CONSTRUCTED RIFFLE
I
STA=12+11.71
1
I
ELEV=705.50
I
II
END
CONSTRUCTED RIFFLE/LOG VANE
STA=12+33
lob
ELEV=705.10
BEGIN
VARIABLE CONSTRUCTED RIFFLE
STA=12+67.30
-
STA
12+72.
ELEV=705.00
E
:704.9
I
5M
12+77.4
.704704.7.6
BTA
2+82.3
ELEELE\:
END VARIABLE CONSTRUCTED RIFFLE
STA=12+87.28
I
o I
ELEV=704.50
I
I
1
I
I
I
EGIN CONSTRUCTED RIFFLE
STA=13+28.03
I
I
ELEV=704.40
'
END CONSTRUCTED RIFFLE/ROCK STEP
/
STA=13+50.19
ELEV=704.00
I I
7
/
\IBEGIN
CONSTRUCTED RIFFLE
STA=13+88.31
\
I
ELEV=703.80
I
END
CONSTRUCTED RIFFLE/ROCK STEP
I
x
STA=14+08.35
ELEV=703.50
r
1
BEGIN
VARIABLE CONSTRUCTED RIFFLE
STA=14+35.29
:1 0430.3
ELEV=703.20
SSE
1{+45.
E
V: 703.
EU
V. 702.
STA
4+55.
ElE
STA:
t702.8
4+60.
/
ELE
7027
STA
ELE
6.6
702.8
END
VARIABLE CONSTRUCTED RIFFLE
/ROCK STEP
r
STA=14+70.02
ELEV=702.50
�\
I
O
J � J
r
al
J
J
n
n�i
�OrppI
01
pJ
O
A
00u
N T O
SHEET
015016181
JOB NO.
AS NOTED
SCALE.
H/N'qi
S0. DATE BY DESCRIPTION
Plans Prepared By:
•
C-4°0
CITY VIEW
w a�t4 A9
NST ! ��
_ - s
O �n �• m cr_
u, 5 d' c
, o F
.
Kirk ey})> Horn
NC LICENSE NO. F-0102
CAD FII.F. PATH
PKLPARLD BY
CHUCKLUBY
O 9 1�
PLAN AND PROFILE
%.�'o/ 9 �s:'
200 South Tryon Street, Suite 200
CRAM,
JCD
12/11/=7h�Y.
3
18
•HINI••r�
Charlotte, North Carolina 28202
APPROVEDBr
UAIE
Ph- [phone]

5016 Citv of Ch
C-4.1 PLAN AND PROFILE Dec 13. 2017 5:
tl¢.'Prdhd4Mf!aNlRE1M1°SNCBlt5YM 6Mi!"419'M"'Ltly08!!"Com?} q>LCWIININD �PREIiIhE4iifi/blelPlDdP 1P7 ROWf P�9M9^lBYIMt ror�0�ry.p4dpERya64
, T
S �N11N� 1-000
/111
I l l r 711171
r.�r
woo\ j1� l `\ i II i il�r/i/('I/i
f0-0
I I I I 11 11� 1 1 JJJ
Ili
m \\ 1 \ \ / I 1 1 1IJill 1111 10
If I
If I It II0
// l 1 1 ( j l I / l J� l l I j � j � �I II I I
I/
� // / I Of
/
I /l �/l //�� / j'/� ' 1111111/ �Jlllll(
-/ j 1
+
/ I I II(
If It I
If
I
If
n
\ l I 1 l 1 \ \\ 100 I i / ' _ \It
2
L_z
1 1 1 \\ 1 11 1 1 11 0
\ II 1\ 1 1 1 I n I m P I r q
E�1 11 11 \ \\ \\ \\ i I 1 I I l�l I �W � I \ I �`•���_
NQ ,
J
J, SD i' I m / 1,
/ „Zoo/
z oD
,f
.�
\ I - ) \ ✓�� / , IJi \\\\ \ \\ I
//1\
I
al
0
�n
O z u CI
O a CFn _
N _
D z Z
S.
I m A�
O
n
x
A
A
D
til
0
0
rn
0
0
0
0
m
m
0
rn� 0+
O
m
0
d"d Am,c W.. tho. Nal ee without IfthIty Id Kt"br- d A -111M W.
SHEET
015016181
JOR �O.
AS NOTED
SCALE
n}o}, AI
to. 01rr Rv OexRlrrlo�
Plans Prepared By:
•
C-�al
CITY VIEW
\
Kimley� Horn
Q 2017
NC LICENSE NO. F-0102
�_
BEGIN
VARIABLE CONSTRUCTED RIFFLE
()I
KJH
J(A
PIt4:PARLU a7
STAG
EUV:
08.5
102.3
%O
.i'D +��s.
STA=15+02.41
ELEV=702.40
� j
MI�,
JCD
IZA tai W 77
i8
bA -
cloSouth
Charlotte, North Carolina 282U2
I
STA:i
14.8
AtM'itUYLU 91
UATE
Phone: [phone]
ELEV:
02.2
/
STA: 15
ELEV..
20.7
02.1
END VARIABLE CONSTRUCTED RIFFLE
/LOG VANE
I
1
STA=15+26.65
ELEV=701.90
I,
I
H
I I
II
I
I
I
I
BEGIN CONSTRUCTED RIFFLE
1
STA=15+63.38
/
ELEV=701.80
END CONSTRUCTED RIFFLE
/LOG VANE
I
STA=15+79.38
I �o
ELEV=701.50
I I$
I I
\
CRIFFLEJ
/
BEGIN VARIABL U
STA=16+14.66
S1
ae+2
.0
ELEV=701.40
I E
V. 701
1^701
END VARIABLE CONSTRUCTED RIFFLE
/ROCK STEP
STA=16+30.45
IVI
ELEV=701.10
I Ix
I
I
I
I
I
BEGIN VARIABLE CONSTRUCTED RIFFLE
--
STA=16+65.39
-
STA:6+70.
ELEV=700.90
ELE
.700.9
ELE
.700.7
END
VARIABLE CONSTRUCTED RIFFLE
/ROCK STEP
\
STA=16+81.18
1 c \ 1
ELEV=700.60
th
„ I
If
I I
I
BEGIN CONSTRUCTED RIFFLE
STA=17+19.56
I
ELEV=700.40
END
CONSTRUCTED RIFFLE
I
/ROCK STEP
STA=17+27.97
ELEV=700.30
/
II I
Ia
II \
I \ 1
BEGIN CONSTRUCTED RIFFLE
/LOG SILL
STA=17+69.03
ELEV=700.1 O
i
TIE TO EXISTING
CULVERT
- --
STA=17+96.59
ELEV=699.72
\
1
1
1
I
_
I
1
I
�l
�1
/
SHEET
015016181
JOR �O.
AS NOTED
SCALE
n}o}, AI
to. 01rr Rv OexRlrrlo�
Plans Prepared By:
•
C-�al
CITY VIEW
� �Sp "°qo
w Aq ' '
_a T t On S �_
L
V ' pp a a a Z
0? a ��" c 1 E
91�
Kimley� Horn
Q 2017
NC LICENSE NO. F-0102
�_
CAT VILE PATH
()I
KJH
J(A
PIt4:PARLU a7
PLAN AND PROFILE
(7ILCKI:U 9Y
%O
.i'D +��s.
zoo TryonStreet,Caeolina29202ite
� j
MI�,
JCD
IZA tai W 77
i8
bA -
cloSouth
Charlotte, North Carolina 282U2
AtM'itUYLU 91
UATE
Phone: [phone]

awing name: K:\CHL-PRJ\015016 City of Charlotte\181 City Vlew\Codd\Plan Sheets\40-PLAN AND PROFILE.dwg C-4.2 PLAN AND PROFILE Dec 13, 2017 3:1
49 grehcW6^°NeR21N•Sw88t191^P.81ry^VIpT"LMyP,84pc°°a?21Pf76f^MND°Prt>9Fk2^I"t9eEeIN61w Y7. -VI WVS!goresZwW 10'N^�1CiIL•9Ro4878d1ei°t8y^eR tnreH5rlt�sen°c1Mf 4�1eWldd5lflwL8A51net
A
D
W 0
I
-19 , > O 0 Z
1a
O W.
00 N 1.100 A
n o 0 0
rD Z i rrD Z l Z
O~
N
O1
0
w
w
+
Ln
J
A
aD
\0. DATE By OF.SCWI'TIDS
N
�/-
O
CITY VIEW
P OWU
:imi
SCALE
A
D
W 0
I
-19 , > O 0 Z
1a
O W.
00 N 1.100 A
n o 0 0
rD Z i rrD Z l Z
O~
N
O1
0
w
w
+
Ln
J
A
aD
\0. DATE By OF.SCWI'TIDS
N
(a
O
CITY VIEW
P OWU
:imi
SCALE
A9 °9y
Kimley>>) Horn
CAD FIIF PATH
�+�
ti 5r as w aZ
u, $ ��' a o
Q z0n
NC LICENSE NO. F-0102
-
KJH
JCD
vw:vALU:Unv
<TI6cLceDBT
i4o�9 �'d!�
��DT�r��1
PLAN AND PROFILE
a, r
200 South Tryon Street, Suite 200
lAlu�lli�.�ll� .
JCD
12/11/2017
1
4 kill "k
Charlotte, North Carolina 282U2
BEGIN VARIABLE CONSTRUCTED RIFFLE
STA=30+01.82
ARVROVEDOI
PAIL
Phaao: (704) 11MII11
STA:'
ELEV=676.60
)+08.0
676.4
I
ELEV
STA:3
+14.2
ELEV.
576.3
STA: 3(
20.4
ELEV.
78.1
'El V:
6.0
TA'. 332.121
ELEV B
5.8
'
TA:30+
A.
9.0
LEVB
.7
N
$ 311+
2
LEV:67
.6
:675
L
ST :30+5
.6
EV.875.
3
VARIABLE
CONSTRUCTED RIFFLE
-7IEND
/ROCK STEP
L
STA=30+63.82
ELEV=675.10
BEGIN VARIABLE CONSTRUCTED RIFFLE
I
STA=30+84.54
ELEV=674.90
STA: 0+91.5
674.7
STA: 98.5
END VARIABLECONSTRUCTED RIFFLE
/ROCK STEP
STA=31+05.24
I
I
ELEV-674.30
BEGIN VARIABLE CONSTRUCTED RwrLEj
I I
STA=31+20.89
ELEV=674.10
TA: 314 29.8
MEM B 3.8
A 31+ 7
V67 .6 END
VARIABLE CONSTRUCTED RIFFLE
I N I
/ROCK STEP
STA=31+47.23
ELEV=673.30
/II
I
rEGIN
VARIABLE CONSTRUCTED RIFFLE
STA=31+68.66
ELEV=673.10
:6728
/
I/ STA:
1+85.6
ELEN
872.8
VARIABLE CONSTRUCTED RIFFLE
]END
/ROCK STEP
STA=31+72.393.79
-
ELEV=60
I'
,
BEGIN VARIABLE CONSTRUCTED RIFFLE
STA=32+24.99
I
I
ELEV=672.10
TA: 32
3.9
IElEV:6
1.8
/
S A:32+
28
L
tEV 67
VARIABLE CONSTRUCTED RIFFLE
/ROCK STEP
STA=32+51.41
JEND
ELEV=671.30
GIN VARIABLE CONSTRUCTED RIFFLE
STA=32+74.91
'
ELEV=671.10
STA: 2+82
ELE .670.8
STA +90.4
'
ELE 870.5
STA: 3 98.{
TA 33. M.
ELEV:6 9.9
TIE TO EXISTING CULVERT INVERT
-
-
- - -
STA=33+16.43
\
ELEV=669.50
i
1
�
7
I
,
1
'
1
1
/
SHEET
015016181
AS NOTED
\0. DATE By OF.SCWI'TIDS
Plans Prepared By:
-4.2
CITY VIEW
Joe SO.
SCALE
A9 °9y
Kimley>>) Horn
CAD FIIF PATH
�+�
ti 5r as w aZ
u, $ ��' a o
Q z0n
NC LICENSE NO. F-0102
-
KJH
JCD
vw:vALU:Unv
<TI6cLceDBT
i4o�9 �'d!�
��DT�r��1
PLAN AND PROFILE
a, r
200 South Tryon Street, Suite 200
lAlu�lli�.�ll� .
JCD
12/11/2017
1
4 kill "k
Charlotte, North Carolina 282U2
ARVROVEDOI
PAIL
Phaao: (704) 11MII11

Drawfna name: K:\CHL_PRJ\015016 My of
C-4.3 GRADING PLAN Dec 12, 2017 7:58am by. nancy.mancuso
*sw*. .pw?%renbimIQF mo-OHg" PZ71NA6(y, KimleY and Am LM M.'�t a ;ty to
S1N�
*goo'[
�� �1i
l.dA-s �N,'1N. 1f I I
o ) I I
S I� m )
1 / \
1 \ I I 1 _ 1 i-= iii
v I
\ 11 1 \\ � I i I � j ( \ \\ f 11111 I nll //!� � \\\ \`--�-' i � viii � i � � i i��/ Il I (I \IlI
\ \ \ 11 \ I I I \ l I 11 1 111) I I li lI ! )/ ----------
-----------
It
------
-\\\ j I I I
I I I 1 ) I (f ---_-----_
I I III
I I 1 /
/' / / \ /� \ / 1
/ / Jill I
III I I
ziI !)Ill I
1 ( / j / ♦ // I IIIII I ;I 11111 1 / '/i i/ _ o I III II I(I II
I III I I1 1 1Ij11111I
/,
I 1 1 I
I I I I tl
(�
1 1 1 11 j/ \
11) \\ t \ // �/ j j/ ! l I / 1 1 1 1 I I I
I 1 III,/ \ \ \� .\ / / / / / / 11 II / Ill IIII (I
Il,/ (
Ir l I 1 ll( , I I -+ 1 I l�\�-• \\ �\� / `\ // // ///111 I 1 m 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
\\_J
V�
) I l 1 11'1\1 I c I ,�/♦ \ \_� �\\\-� � � � /� / \� I I L_ p0 III 11 I I I t )
_ _ \� \
\\ It
\ \ 1 \ \ I / _ r7 \ \ �\ I l� \ \ \ \ \ 1 0 I I 1 1 I
_21
NN
it
\ \ \ \oma, \ IIIII 1 I f
N. \ 1 \ n IIIII II )
\ I I I j 1 I j l Il t
)\NI 1 \ \ 1 l jl I I ( I \ I ��� _ "//\ \
1 1 1) N I I I
\\\\\)\ I
\ \\ \ I I I / ' ,/ 1 II \ I I�
\\ I \ \\ r / L
1 1 1 1
\I\I`
N.
\
N. /m I ! I I (\ � " <� ♦ i / t n 1 III 1111 I \
I �G )`\\ ) , ,/ /•' I 1 ,/ I I I I '\\, ,% - ' 1 -o m 1 \,III II , �
III I 1141 .t
\ J 1 \\ \ _ \ y� (n \\♦ �/ \ I I I /\ / i / i' m 111 I
1NN
1
\\ / m / /) / //
N. I II \ 1 ( 1 11 \` I\ 11 I I 1 II III 1 I I I I
/� �\� \ \ \ / ♦ / \ \ 1 a I IV I
\ ' ` _ II
/
%i-�J/✓-� / / '• \ \ \ \ \\` � % (/ t/ \ \\ \ 1 1 1 1 \ I 1 II IIII I
/11 \\ \\
\\
N.
\�
u
N.
10
\ I I / +, \ 1 j I I i I I III/
1-4
\\ \
I
1'/'
oa
`1 ' li%t 1 1:33 �N �H�ldW oD
S d 1 R
Z
A�
O
015016181 AS NOTED Ur NO. Dalt et UbvRIPHON Plans Prepared By: •
sliEer CITY VIEW JOB No. SCA1 s Np Vii,, ■
C-�.3 N � , °p�,9== Kimley>>> Horn
CAU 1111 PAIH p ?a -
's' �" cs a_ © 2017
K'� u, �� m� 0 05 NC LICENSE NO. F-0102
DI PRCPARLDBY CIILCNLD BI' O 9
p GRADING PLAN °o ''+ya �t �,.�` 200 South Tryou Street, Suite 200CHARLOM
18 JCD 12/it%1a17 Charlotte North Carolina 28202
1 APPRO'LU 8Y DAIC �/1111111M�" Phaae: [phone]

name: K:\CHL_PRJ\015016 Clty of Charlotte\181 Clly VIeW\Gadd\PlanSh eels\45-GRADING PLAN.dWg C-4.4 GRADING PLAN Dec 12, 2017 7:513— by. .Doty.
V,d9aNheNai{iJse SMaatl3Np dR�➢^V'i2�ri""L'I�s✓!16t4^Cd+1°{'OkMM01111�fPtPETtV°• 'DlLlIA1�aP�l� �4HH ia'fM7�B�9aMl d'r'Ik:k(CML�{ia�9R'JW�dOI'Jr'N� EN6PIIBE4Pl{7!!0"EAt�' �>`lNlha9hMlll!'\49mOR1{01N�
-----------
1
-
1 / �
ll r ' 1 11 I,I
+
/'i
LLA'
O
sheer
015016181
JOB HD.
AS NOTED
SI:ALL
• htryi
No. Dail, M D�:�:HlvuOn
Plans Prepared By:
•
C4.4
CITY VIEW
W _ �� ° °9i-
�� � '^„ �;
ut ;",^ �o o ?
.
Kimley>> Horn
© 2017
NC LICENSE NO. F-0102
—
CAD PILL PKIH
OF
K JK
JCD
PRI:PARDD BY
GRADING PLAN
CIII:CKI;D BI'
200 South Tryon Street, Suite 200
JCD
u/tthon
18
� �. ,.�"
CharlotlF North Carolina 28202
APPRONLD13Y
DAI'L
Phu.e: (71141333-5I3I

8
MIN. LOG DIM.
EF
BANKFULL
fi EDGE OF WATER A
i
F
FLOW_
EDGE OF WATER
BANKFULL
NAIL ALL UPSTREAI
OF LOGS WITH N(
GEOTEXTILE FAB[
BOULDERS TO BE BURIED AND
PLACED AT END OF LOGS
CON5THUC1 H11FLE 1WIH 1.0 ULLH UKAUAI
OF 1"-12" RIP -RAP. #57 STONE, AND
APPROXIMATELY 10% STICKS. BRANCHES LE
THAN 4" IN DIAMETER, AND LEAF PACK.
TOP OF�
BANK
ADD SOME 18"-30"
BOULDERS INTO RIFFLES.
PLACE RANDOMLY.
BOULDERS SHOULD BE 0.2
TO 1.0 ABOVE BASE FLOW
BANKFULL
3E OF WA'
ALTERNATE 3 FLOW
POOL
(PER PLAN) . 9�. 121
+ t�. +.„1+ :`moi• iii �� y� ti ��
W,1�.;. &® . GE .F WATER ., BANKFULL
CB
BOULDER AND ROCK TOE
PROTECTION WHERE NORMAL
WATER MEETS THE BANKS
I
I
B
[�C� SEE PROFILE FOR SPACING
BETWEEN LOGS, TYP.
PLAN VIEW
PLAN VIEW
)PE
IFFLE
EXCAVATED POOL
PER PROFILE
EDGE OF WATER
A
FLOW
'OOL
EDGE OF WATER
BANKFULL
HEADER LOG. TYP.
SEE PROFILE FOR ELEVATION
MICRO -POOL DEPTH
0.2' TO 0.4'
WELL GRADED MIX OF 1"-12"
RIP RAP, #57 STONE AND
NATURAL CHANNEL MATERIAL
FLOW
COIR FIBER
MATTING (TYP)
'C' SLOPE
TOE OF SLOPE
SECTION B -B
OO
COIR FIBER
MATTING (TYP)
POOL
EXCAVATED POOL
PER PROFILE
NAIL ALL UPSTREAM FACES OF LOGS 0
WITH NONWOVEN GEOTEXTILE FABRIC, TYP.
SEE PROJECT SPECIAL PROVISIONS CP
SECTION A -A TOE OF SLOPE
SECTION C C
NOTES:
1. PLACE NON -WOVEN FABRIC ON THE UPSTREAM SIDE OF
THE MOST UPSTREAM LOG SILL IN THE CONSTRUCTED
RIFFLE.
2. COIR MATTING MUST BE KEYED IN BELOW THE RIFFLE
BELOW THE RIFFLE MATERIAL ON THE BANKS.
--KEY INTO BANK
MINIMUM OF 'A"
1 VARIABLE CONSTRUCTED RIFFLE
Not to Scale
HEAD OF RIFFLE
(PER PLAN/PROFILE)
FLOW (PER
OF RIFFLE
(PER PLAN/PROFILE)
OC(OE RIFFLE
POOL
POOL
SECTION A -A
2 CONSTRUCTED RIFFLE
Na t0 Scale
SECTION B -B
DIMENSION CHART
LABEL
VALUE UNIT
A
3 FEET
B
8-10 I INCHES
C
0 1 PERCENT
COIR FIBER
MATTING (TYP)
0.7 MIN.
TOE OF SLOPE
'':�QAHIBA 0,���A
�?O eOFESSi�� y�4�
a SF!!
i�m�`o`r
Dec 13 2017 5:18 PM

U
o
Oft^
1
I
I
I I
PLAN VIEW
BACKFILL WITH WELL GRADED MIX OF
2"-12" RIP RAP AND ON-SITE MATERIAL
ANON -WOVEN
GEOTEXTILE FABRIC
FLOW —
STREAM BED—
\�9 ---4- FOOTER LOG/CUT OFF SILL
END OF LOG BURRIED
INTO STREAM BED
SECTION B -B
3 LOG VANE
Not to Scale
APPROXIMATEBASE COARSE BACKFILL (SEE NOTE 10)
FLOW WATER LEVEL
%7 -CONTROL POINT ELEVATION
STREAM BED HEADER LOG (SEE NOTES 7,8AND 11C)
FLOW
�i XZ -POOL CONTROL POM ELEVATION
X4 �
COARSE BACK LL 2.X7 POOL
(SEE NOTE 10) � p
X1- SILL CONTROL PODRHL-VATION
(SEE NOTE 3) I I FILTER FABRIC FOOTER LOC
(SEE NOTES) (SEE NOTE 7,N
XB
A
B B PROFILEA-A'
1 �
-�X7
X5 APPROXIMATE BASE
FLOW WATER LEVEL
ppp� - LDGSTNG GfROUPD
f I STREAM BOK STABaYATI N, TOP OF BOOK
- FSPECIFIED(SEEMCMEI2) TOE LF
SLOPE
HEALOG SILL (SEF NOTE 1; (SEE NR Lac
(SEE N07E47ANDH)
STREAM BANK. TYPICAL
TOPOFSANL _
TYPICJIL
X2 -POOL CONTROL
PONT ELEVATK7N I X7
TOE OF BOK, (SEE NOTE 3) X5 L,
TYPrAL �f
STREAMS®
PLAN VIEW " N�
CROSS SECTION B - IT
NONWOVEN GEOTEXTILE
FABRIC, TYP.
FOOTER LOG
LAYER
_� PERPENDICULAR TO THE CHANNEL.
SECTION A -A
NOTE&
1
BRUSH LAYER
1. A LOO SILL MAY BE USED ALONE OR IN COMBINATION WITH A CONSTRUCTED RIFFLE.
BELOW LOG
Z THE USE OF LOGS IN THE STREAM BED SHALL BE LIMITED TO PERENNIAL WATERBODES ONLY.
(
3- AN ELEVATION CONTROL POINT SHALL BE DESIGNATED AT THE CENTER OF THE SILL TO ESTABLISH PMT
)L2 See pr fle FT. (NAV POOL CONTROL PONT ELEVATION
PLAN VIEW
BACKFILL WITH WELL GRADED MIX OF
2"-12" RIP RAP AND ON-SITE MATERIAL
ANON -WOVEN
GEOTEXTILE FABRIC
FLOW —
STREAM BED—
\�9 ---4- FOOTER LOG/CUT OFF SILL
END OF LOG BURRIED
INTO STREAM BED
SECTION B -B
3 LOG VANE
Not to Scale
APPROXIMATEBASE COARSE BACKFILL (SEE NOTE 10)
FLOW WATER LEVEL
%7 -CONTROL POINT ELEVATION
STREAM BED HEADER LOG (SEE NOTES 7,8AND 11C)
FLOW
�i XZ -POOL CONTROL POM ELEVATION
X4 �
COARSE BACK LL 2.X7 POOL
(SEE NOTE 10) � p
X1- SILL CONTROL PODRHL-VATION
(SEE NOTE 3) I I FILTER FABRIC FOOTER LOC
(SEE NOTES) (SEE NOTE 7,N
XB
A
B B PROFILEA-A'
1 �
-�X7
X5 APPROXIMATE BASE
FLOW WATER LEVEL
ppp� - LDGSTNG GfROUPD
f I STREAM BOK STABaYATI N, TOP OF BOOK
- FSPECIFIED(SEEMCMEI2) TOE LF
SLOPE
HEALOG SILL (SEF NOTE 1; (SEE NR Lac
(SEE N07E47ANDH)
STREAM BANK. TYPICAL
TOPOFSANL _
TYPICJIL
X2 -POOL CONTROL
PONT ELEVATK7N I X7
TOE OF BOK, (SEE NOTE 3) X5 L,
TYPrAL �f
STREAMS®
PLAN VIEW " N�
CROSS SECTION B - IT
NONWOVEN GEOTEXTILE
FABRIC, TYP.
FOOTER LOG
LAYER
_� PERPENDICULAR TO THE CHANNEL.
SECTION A -A
NOTE&
DIM BNSIONS(VALLIES TO BE PROVIDED BY OESIGNBq
1. A LOO SILL MAY BE USED ALONE OR IN COMBINATION WITH A CONSTRUCTED RIFFLE.
VAIBABLE VALUES TYPICAL UNT DESCRIPTION
Z THE USE OF LOGS IN THE STREAM BED SHALL BE LIMITED TO PERENNIAL WATERBODES ONLY.
X1 see pro(Ne FT. (NAV D) SILL. CONTROL PONE ELEVATION
3- AN ELEVATION CONTROL POINT SHALL BE DESIGNATED AT THE CENTER OF THE SILL TO ESTABLISH PMT
)L2 See pr fle FT. (NAV POOL CONTROL PONT ELEVATION
OF THE PROFILE POOL ELEVATION CONTROL POINTS OR EXCAVATIM TO A SPECIFIED MAXIMUM POOL.
X3 see typtals FT. STWAMBEDVW)TH
DEPTH SHALL BE DESIGNATED TO ESTABLISH THE REMAINING PROFILE. SURVEY OF CONTROL POINTS
X4 seetypcals FT. CHANNEL WIDTH
SHALL BE REQUIRED TO ESTABLISH ACCURATE INSTALLATION WITH IN THE TOLERANCE SPECIFIED BY THE
DESIGNER.
3W 3.5 FT LENGTH OF SILL Bl8®®N N(
OBA
XS 3 FT. LENGTH OF TXTA RSE BACKFILL
4. NO PMT OF THE SILL SHALL BE PLACED ABOVE THE EtEVAT10NCF EG"6WA IEw BASE FLOW
XT 5-1O IN.LOC- CIA METER
5. IF PLANS DESIGNATE THE USE OF MULTIPLE LOG BILLS A TABLEOFALL ATOM LOCATIONSMD CONTROL
XS 1-3 N IN OR FT. APP;i6XR1A TE BASE FLOW DEPTH
POINT ELEVATIONS SHALL BE PROVIDED IN THIS DETAIL OR PROVIDED ELSEWHERE N THEPLOISAND
REFERENCED HEREIN.
8. TYPICAL RIFFLE AND POOL CROSS SECTIONS SHALL BE PROVIDED ELSEWHERE N THEPUWSTC
ESTABLISH THE DIMENSIONS OF THE CHANNEL GRADING NTO WHICH THE LOG SILLS ARETO BE
INSTALLED.
7. LOGS SHALL BE OF A LENGTH AND DIAMETER SPECIFIED BY THE DESIGNER AND BE RELATNELY STRNGIR
HARDWOOD. RECENTLY HARVESTED. THE LENGTH OF THE SILL EMBEDDED INTO EACH BARK SHALL EQUAL
OR EXCEED THE WIDTH OF THE CHANNEL
B A SINGLE LOG4AVA WILL BE USED N LIEU OFA HEADERfF007ER LOG COMBINATION.
S. FILTER FABRIC OFATYPE MDSRE SPECIFllD BY THE DES('NB2 SHALLBE USEDTOSEALTHEGAPS
BETWEEN THE LOG(S) AND THE STREAM BED, LNDER THE COARSE R40 L.L MATERIAL THE FABRIC
SHALL BE NAILED TO THE ENTIRE LENGTH HEADER LOG USING AGALVANPFD NAL WITH APLASTIC CAP.
THE SIZE AND GAGE OF NAL AND NAIL SPACING SHALL BE SPECIFIED BY THE DESICMER. THERE SHALL BE
NO FILTER FABRIC VISIBLE N THE FINISHED WORK EDGES SHALL BE FOLDED, TUCKED, OR TRIMMED AS
NEEDED.
70. COARSE BACKFILL OF THE LOG SILL SHALL BE OF A TYPE, SIZE, AND GRADATION AS SPECIFIEDBY THE
DESIGNER, COARSE BACKFLL SHALL BE PLACED TO A THICKNESS EQUAL TOTHE DEPTH OF THE HEADER
(ARD ANY FOOTER) LOGS AND SHALL EXTEND UPSTREAM FROM THE SILLA DISTANCE SPECIFIED BY THE
DESICNER-
11. THE LOG SILL IS GENERALLY CONSTRUCTED AS FOLLOWS
A OVER4EXCAVATE STREAM BED TOA DEPTH EQUAL TO THE. TOTAL THICKNESS OF THE HEADER "D
FOOTER IF SPECIFIED) LOGS.
e. PLACE FOOTER LOGS. IF SPECIFIED. A LAYER OF BEDDING MATERIAL UNDER THE F007E R LOC MAY
EE SPECIFIED BY THE DESIGNERC.
INSTALL HEADER LOG ON TOP OF THE FOOTER LOG. HEADER LOG MAY BE SET FORWARD OR BACK
FROM FOOTER LOG ASM OPTION.
D. NAIL FILTER FABRIC TO THE WADER LOG.
E. PLACE COARSE BACKFILL BEHIND LOGS) ENSURING THAT ANYMXOS BETWEEN THE LOGS ARE
FILLED.
F. TRIM ANY EXPOSED FILTER FABRIC AROUND THE SILL INSTALLATION.
12. STREW BANK STABLIZATDN. IF SPECIFIED, SHALL BE ADDED TOTHS DETAILOR DETAILED SEPARATELY
AND REFERENCED HEREIN.
a`•,�N LICA BO! ''•
��oQeFESsi�� p'•; -
SF t
" 'PS I lit o ,•
CLP�V�, c
Dec 13 2017 5:18 PM
O
Z
G i
IDM lYl�l� Y
i
i
LOG SILL
Not to Scale W tri o0

TWINE TIES, TYPICAL
X1 - BMI FULL CONTROL PONT
(SEE NOTE 2)
GRASSES.
APPROXIMATE BASE
FLOW WATER LEVEL
FOOTERLOG
EXISTING GROUND \
EXISTINGTOP
OF SLOPE
1 % XX12
X11 I 11
ir—F 1
STABILIZATION, IF SPECIFIED
(SEE NOTE 7)
-NONWOVEN GEOMMLE BETWEEN COARSE WOODY
MATERIAL AND SOD MATS
\ TYPICAL (SEE NOTES 1 A 4)
`LINE STAKES. TYPICAL
F SPECIFIED (SEE NOTE 5)
SMALL BRANCHESOEBRIS
(SEE NOTE 3)
TOE OF BANK, TYPICAL J
. X4 -SOD MATS WANE
STAKES SHOWN CROSS SECTION A - A'
(SEE NOTES 1 S 4)
MATTING. TYPICAL TOP OF BANK
(SEE NOTE i
TOP OF BANKANCHOR
(SEE DETAIL, THIS SHEET)
S DEAD STOUTSTAKE
TYPICAL (SEE DETAIL,
THIS SHEET)
�Ii
615
SATING OVERLAP /
(SEE DETAIL. THIS SHEET) J
MATTING STAKE, TYPICAL (SEE NOTE SI
TOE OF BANK ANCHOR (SEE DETAIL, THS SHEET) /
CROSS-SECTION
4.
UNTREATED
TX4•(N BOARD
BOARD
X9
P-1?
DEAD STOUT STAKE DETAIL
PHOTO: TOE WOOD WITH SOD MATS
TOP OF BANK
(BANKFULL)
COARSE WOOD MATERAL
(SEE NOTE 3)
SMALL BRANCHESIDEBRIS,TYPICAL)
(SEE NOTE 3) F
LIVE STAKES,TYPICAL
IF SPECIFIED (SEE NOTE 5)1
F o A,
•.Y. '4 �: o
o. e
Xt - BANHffULL CONTROL POINT
GRASSES.TYPI,,
SOD MATT TRANSFiANTSIDTHER.
TYPICAL (SEE NOTES 1 a4)
EASTNkW.
DIMENSIONS (VALUES TO BE PROVIDED BY DESIGNER)
y�
3 Q IQ
GROUNX14
pDY
X1
MATERIAL
n
X2
ED BANKFULLX13Ti'xBX17TO-_.
Fr.
HEIGHT OF STREAM BANK REPA R
X3
1.3 FT
N CR Fr.
TOE WOOD HEIGHT
X4
Bee plan
N OR FT.
HEIGHT OF STREAM BANG REPAIR ABOVE TOE WOOD
X5
see plan
NCR FT.
HEIGHT OF SLOPE STABILIZATION
XB
Na
N OR FT.
SOD MAT THICKNESS
X7
2
NONE
STREAM BANK REPAIR SLOPE RATIO (HORIZONTAL COMPDNEIM
X8
24 N O.C.
N CR FT.
LINE STAKE SPACING
X9
24 IN
N CR FT.
LIVE STAKE LENGTH
APPROXIMATE BASE
FLOW WATER LEVEL
FOOTERLOG
EXISTING GROUND \
EXISTINGTOP
OF SLOPE
1 % XX12
X11 I 11
ir—F 1
STABILIZATION, IF SPECIFIED
(SEE NOTE 7)
-NONWOVEN GEOMMLE BETWEEN COARSE WOODY
MATERIAL AND SOD MATS
\ TYPICAL (SEE NOTES 1 A 4)
`LINE STAKES. TYPICAL
F SPECIFIED (SEE NOTE 5)
SMALL BRANCHESOEBRIS
(SEE NOTE 3)
TOE OF BANK, TYPICAL J
. X4 -SOD MATS WANE
STAKES SHOWN CROSS SECTION A - A'
(SEE NOTES 1 S 4)
MATTING. TYPICAL TOP OF BANK
(SEE NOTE i
TOP OF BANKANCHOR
(SEE DETAIL, THIS SHEET)
S DEAD STOUTSTAKE
TYPICAL (SEE DETAIL,
THIS SHEET)
�Ii
615
SATING OVERLAP /
(SEE DETAIL. THIS SHEET) J
MATTING STAKE, TYPICAL (SEE NOTE SI
TOE OF BANK ANCHOR (SEE DETAIL, THS SHEET) /
CROSS-SECTION
4.
UNTREATED
TX4•(N BOARD
BOARD
X9
P-1?
DEAD STOUT STAKE DETAIL
PHOTO: TOE WOOD WITH SOD MATS
TOP OF BANK
(BANKFULL)
COARSE WOOD MATERAL
(SEE NOTE 3)
SMALL BRANCHESIDEBRIS,TYPICAL)
(SEE NOTE 3) F
LIVE STAKES,TYPICAL
IF SPECIFIED (SEE NOTE 5)1
F o A,
•.Y. '4 �: o
o. e
Xt - BANHffULL CONTROL POINT
GRASSES.TYPI,,
SOD MATT TRANSFiANTSIDTHER.
TYPICAL (SEE NOTES 1 a4)
5 TOE PROTECTION - TOE WOOD
Not to Scale
X2
DRECTgN RATTING, TYPICAL
(SEE NOTE 1)
X4
MATTING OVERLAP
(SEE NOTES)
Q DIRECTKXN OF STREAK FLOW
®DIRECTION DOWN THE BANK SLOPE
APPROXIMATEBASE MATTING OVERLAP DETAIL
FLOW WATER LEVEL
VTOP OF BANK
NK
1
TYPICAL
E 1)
y
MATTING ANCHOR DETAIL
TOE OF BANK
MATTING WRAP
+s (SEE NOTE 2)
N TOE OF BANK
DEAD STOUT STAKE. TYPICAL
(SEE DETAIL, SHEET 1)
"—TOE OF BANK
MATTING OVERLAP
DIMENSIONS (VALUES TO BE PROVIDED BY DESIGNER)
VARIABLE VALUES
TYPICAL
UNIT
DESCRIPTION
X1
see profte FT. (NAVD)
BANKFULL CONTROL PONT ELEVATION
X2
n/a
Fr.
HEIGHT OF STREAM BANK REPA R
X3
1.3 FT
N CR Fr.
TOE WOOD HEIGHT
X4
Bee plan
N OR FT.
HEIGHT OF STREAM BANG REPAIR ABOVE TOE WOOD
X5
see plan
NCR FT.
HEIGHT OF SLOPE STABILIZATION
XB
Na
N OR FT.
SOD MAT THICKNESS
X7
2
NONE
STREAM BANK REPAIR SLOPE RATIO (HORIZONTAL COMPDNEIM
X8
24 N O.C.
N CR FT.
LINE STAKE SPACING
X9
24 IN
N CR FT.
LIVE STAKE LENGTH
X10
VM -2N
N
LIVESTAKEDIA ETEi
X11
1 2
NONE
JTOPOFSTFIEAM BANK REPAIR SLOPE RATA (FIDPRONTAL COMPONH(T)
X12
3
NONE
SLOPE STABILIZATION RATIO(HOR¢ONTAL COMPCNWO
X13
see plan
FT.
STREAM BED WIDTH
X14
See plan
FT.
BANffULL WIDTH
X15
Na
N
FOOTER LOG DIAMETER(MAX. AND MN FAPPLIC.ABLE)
X16
variable
N
COARSEVVLGDY DEBRISDVIMETER(MAX. AND MIN IF .ARFLIC;ABLE)
X17
6
N
TOE WOOD RELATIONSFIP WITH APPROXIMATE BAEE FLOC!✓ %,%,ATM LEVEL
X18
rl/a
NOR F7,
SOD MAT LENGTH
X19
Ma
N OR FT.
SOD MAT WIDTH
X20
TVa
N
SOD MAT THICKNESS
X21
1-2 FT
N OR FT.
I DOTH OF BASE FLOW
5 TOE PROTECTION - TOE WOOD
Not to Scale
X2
DRECTgN RATTING, TYPICAL
(SEE NOTE 1)
X4
MATTING OVERLAP
(SEE NOTES)
Q DIRECTKXN OF STREAK FLOW
®DIRECTION DOWN THE BANK SLOPE
APPROXIMATEBASE MATTING OVERLAP DETAIL
FLOW WATER LEVEL
VTOP OF BANK
NK
1
TYPICAL
E 1)
y
MATTING ANCHOR DETAIL
TOE OF BANK
MATTING WRAP
+s (SEE NOTE 2)
N TOE OF BANK
DEAD STOUT STAKE. TYPICAL
(SEE DETAIL, SHEET 1)
"—TOE OF BANK
MATTING OVERLAP
DIMENSIONS (VALUES TO BE PROVIDED BY DESIGN68
VAAABLE VALUES TYPICAL UNIT
(SEE DETAIL, THIS SHEET)
NOTES: "
X<75
-,T
FT.
1. EROSION CONTROL MATTING SHALL CONSIST OF A GEOTEXTLE OF ATYPE SPECIFIED BY THE DESIGNER
X2
18N
INSTALLED FLAT AND STAKED AGAINST A SLOPE MIDOR ASTREAM BANK
........
X3
12N
.I'.':.::'.{.':.'::.1:.'.:.::'(:'.'.:':...F:.'::... .. ......
....... ......, ........ ......... ...... ,..................
WITTING RELATIONSHIP TO APPROXI NTE BA SE FLOW WATER LEVEL
2. MATTING SHALL BE ANCHORED INA TRENCH AT BOTH THE TOE AND TOPOFTNE STREAM BANK OEPD STOUT
I
- -TOP OF BINK
STAKES AND CLEAN SOIL BACKFILL SHALL BE USED TO SECURE THE MATTING MOTHE TOE AND TOP OF BANK
X5
TFT
TRENCHFSTOPREVENT EROSION OR'WASHNG OUT OF BACKFIL N THE TOE OF BANK ANCHOR TRENCH,
I.. 1 11 1 t'' i I I
I i
MATTING SHALL BE INSTALLED SO THAT IT WRAPS OVER THE DEAD STOUT STAKEAND BACKFpl, MILDS
K
TOP OF BA NK AN}IDRTRENCH suawCFROM TOP OF BANK
POSTI ZONING THE REMAINING MATTING FOR INSTALLATION UP THE STREAM BANK.
5
N
AMLFDR TRENCIH DOTH
X8
8
3. THE SLOPE ANDIOR STREAM BANK SHABE PREPARED (GRADED. TL. SMOOTHED. ETC.) AND SEEDED AND
AN1Ci7R TRENCH WIDTH
MATTING, TYPICALT
(SEE NOTE 1)
MULCHED AS SPECIF IED BY THE DESIGNER PRIOR TO THE PLACEMENT OF TIE NATTNG.
KI
MATTING STAKE TYPICAL
4' THE MATTING SHALL BE INSTALLED SO AS TO NOT BE N TENSION, BUT BE PLACED NEATLY. FLUS/ AGAINST THE
(SEE NOTE S)
SOIL. AND WITH NO GAPS OR WRINKLES.
5. PINY MATTWO OVERLAPS NECESSARY SHALL BE OF A LENGTH SP .. BY THE MANUFACTURER OR AS
XT
;' ' I (.'I'
I
OTHERWISE SPECIFIED BY THE DESIGNER. ALSO, OVERLAPS SHALL BE ORIENTED N A DOWNSLOPE DIRECTION,
%4
APPROXBMTEBASE
DOWNSTREAM DIRECTION, OR OTHERWISE'SHNGLESTYLE' N ACCORDANCE WRH THE DIRECTION OF THE
FLOWWATERLEVEL
DOMINANT EROSIVE ACTON SO THAT THE MATTING END IS PROTECTED AGAINST MOVEMENT.
• -- - - - '
S. THE HELD OF THE MATTING OVER THE SURFACE OF THE SLOPE ANOIOR STREAM BANK SHALL BE SECURED WITH
'. - - '' :TIN•.-
TOE OF BAN(
MATTING STAKES OF A SIZE AND TYPE. IN A PATTE RN, AND WITH SPACING DIMENSIONS AS SPECIFIED BY THE
X3 ...... :-:.�_-...... ... . ..._..-. ":' .��":. .. .... .....
...... ......
MANUFACTURER OR AS OTHERWISE SPECFIED BC/THE DESIGNER.
T. MRNOSHALL ND ANY PROJECT STRUCTESIILVCtURE PRM9,AO9lLSro
RUR
PREVENT LOOSE OR FAYED
a. THERE SHALL BE NO LOOSE ENDS OR UNSECURED MATTING ON THE COMPLETED WORK
TOE OF BANK ANCHOR FLOW
DEAD STOUT
(SEE DETAIL. SHEET A
STAKE TYPICAL
9. THE PLAN VIEW ILLUSTRATES A PERPENDICULAR PERSPECTIVE OF EACH SURFACE DEPICTED IN THE CROSS
PLAN VIEW
(SEE DETAIL. THIS SHEET)
SECTION, THERE IS NO FORESHORTENING OF THE STREAM BANK (OR AMY OTHER SLOPED SURFACE) IN THE PLAN
NOTE 9)
VIEW(SEE
EROSION CONTROL MATTING
6
Not to Scale
NOTES:
1. TOE WOOD IS A STREAM BANK REPAIR/REVETMENT COMPRISED OF.
A LOGS AND OTHER WOODY BRANCH MATERIALS USED TO FORM
THE TOE OF BANK
S. STACKED SOD MATS. TRANSPLANTS. ANMCR OTHER SOIL
SICENGIEERING. STABILIZATION METHOD USED TO FORM THF
STREAM BANK
Z. AN ELEVATION CONTROL PONT SHALL BE DESIGNATED AT BAWFULL
STAGE. SURVEY OF CONTROL POIYTS SHALL BE REOUIPED TO
ESTABLISH THAT TOE WOOD INSTALLATION ISACCURATE TO WITHIN
THE TOLERANCE SPECIFIED BY THE DESIGNER
3. THE CONTRACTOR SHVLLL USE COARSE WOODY MATERIAL SUCH AS
LOGS.-TAWLESS THANO' GZr BRANCHES. AND WOODY DEBRIS,
IDEALLY COLLECTED FROM ON-SITE SOURCES (SUCH AS MATERIAL
CUT FOR PROJECT ACCESS). TO FORM THE TOE OF THE STREAM
THE DESIGNER SI ALL SPECIFY ALL DI MENSIONS OF WOODY MATERIAL
4. EAM BAN( L FORMED FROM
STACKED SOD MATS. TRANSPLANTS COLLECTED FROM HEALTHY
ON-SITE SOURCES, ANDVOR OTHER SOIL BIOENGINEERING
STABILIZATION METHODS. PLANT SPECIES SHALL BE DESIGNATED BY
THE DESIGNER SPECIFIC INFORMATION REGARDING THE STREAM
BANK REPAIR METHOD ABOVE TOE WOOD SHALL BE ADDED TO THIS
DETAIL OR DETAILED SEPARATELY AND REFERENCED HEREIN.
STACKED SOD MATS ARE USED IN THIS EXAMPLE
5 L NE STAKES IF SPECIFIED. SHALL BE OF THE SIZE SPECIFIED BY THE
DESIGNER AND PLACED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PATTERN: AND
SPACING DESIGNATED BY THE DESIGNER ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
REGARDING LIVE STAKING SHALL BE ADDED TO THIS DETAIL OR
DETAILED SEPARATELY AND REFLRLNCLOHLFLN. LTVLSIAKLSAVAY
BE INSTALLED AFTER CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES ARE COMPLETE.
8. IF SOD HATS ARE USED TO FORM THE STREAM BANKS ABOVE THE TOE
WOOD, TWINE, AS SPECIFIED BY THE DESIGNER, MAY BE USED TO
SECURE SOD MATS TO THE LIVE B TAKES TO PREVENT FLOTAI ION OF
SOD MATS DURING HIGH FLOWS PRIOR TO ROOT RE-ESTABLISHMENT.
IF LIVE STAKES ARE NOT SPECIFIED, OTHER STAKES MAY BE USED TO
SECURE SOD MATS, THE DESIGNER SHALL SPECIFY THE MATERIALS.
SIZE AND SPACING OF SUCH STAKES AND INCLUDE THEM IN THIS
DETAIL.
7. IF THE EXEITING TOP OF SLOPE IS HIGHER THAN BAN(FULL STAGE,
ADDITIONAL STABILIZATION ACTIVITIES ABOVE INSTALLATION OF THE
STACKED SOD MATS ANDOR TRANSPLANTS SHALL BE ADDED TO THIS
DETAIL OR DETAILED SEPARATELY AND REFERENCED HEREIN.
,`TWRRIMIRI
CA Bpi &
4N0 eOYiSS/pw I1
G
SEP[
t 1
CL
Dec 13 2017 5:18 PM
PHOTO: EROSION CONTROL MATTING
Iii
5
(-1
U
ei
DIMENSIONS (VALUES TO BE PROVIDED BY DESIGN68
VAAABLE VALUES TYPICAL UNIT
MCRPTION
X1
we plan
FT.
ANTTING HEIGHT (SPECIFY RIO, NGE;F HEIGHT VARIES)
X2
18N
NOR FT.
MATTNGOV6iAP
X3
12N
KORFT.
WITTING RELATIONSHIP TO APPROXI NTE BA SE FLOW WATER LEVEL
X4
3 FT
N OR FT.
ANTTNG STAKE SPACING
X5
TFT
NOR FT.
DEAD STOUT STAKE SPACING IN AN(}ORTRQJDES
X8
t2
K
TOP OF BA NK AN}IDRTRENCH suawCFROM TOP OF BANK
X7
5
N
AMLFDR TRENCIH DOTH
X8
8
K
AN1Ci7R TRENCH WIDTH
X8
18
KI
DEAD STOUT STAKE LENGTH
Iii
5
(-1
U
ei

FLOW \
IMPERVIOUS DME \
CLEAN WATER PUMIIAROUND PUMP
TEMPORARY
FLEXIBLE ROSE
DEWATERINGPUMP
SEDIMENT REMOVAL DEVICE
(SEE DETAIL NEXT SHEET)
I�
PLAN VIEW
TOP OF BAN(— X11 A x2
INSTALLED LIVE STAKE
(SE.E DETAIL, THMSHFF.T)
FLEX13LE HOSE
IMPERVIOUS DME
(SEE DETAIL. THIS SHEET)
TEMPORARY STABILIZED OUTLET
(SEE NOTE D
— LIVE STAKE, SHOWN
WITH LEAF AND
ROOT DEVELOPMENT
X4
APPROXIMATE
BASE FLOW
WATER LEVEL
TOE OF BANKJ
CROSS-SECTION
FLOW WATER LEVEL
SANDBAG /STONE
`7 (SEE NOTE 8)
WORKING
FiOw X10lxilTw
AREA
(SEE NOTE 81
IMPERVIOUS DIKE DETAIL
X2
-VARA�E VALl6
SEDIMENT REMOVAL DEVICE
DIMENSIONS VALUES TO BE PROVIDED BY DESIGNER)
VMLAME
APPROXIMATE
TYPICAL UNIT
DESCRIPTION
BALE -LOW
5
FT.
WATER SURFACE
TOP OF SANK,
STABIOlR1Ef
TEMPORARY FLEXIBLE
HOSE OR SEDIMENT BAG
(SEE NOTE 5)
X2
-VARA�E VALl6
DMEMWtm(VlWNWE PFI IW DESIGNER)
TYPICAL LMT �ClapfiON
N.ORFT -E STAKE MCB.BR HYMN TOP OF BANK
DIMENSIONS VALUES TO BE PROVIDED BY DESIGNER)
VMLAME
VALUES
TYPICAL UNIT
DESCRIPTION
X1
5
FT.
SPLASH PAD I STABILIZED OUTLET WIDTH
X2
5
FT.
SPLASH PAD LENGTH
X3
6
... IN.
SPLASH PAD/ STABILIZED OUTLET THICKNESS
X4
2
FT.
STABILIZED OUTLET LENGTH
X5
4
FT.
STREAM BED WIDTH
X8
N/A
FT.
SEDIMENT BAG PAD LENGTH
X7
10
FT.
SEDIMENT BAG SETBACK FROM TOP OF BANK
XS
N/A
IN
SEDIMENT BAG PAD THICKNESS
XV
3
FT.
IMPERVIOUS DICE LENGTH
X70
1
FT.
IMPERVIOUS DDT HEIGHT
X11
0.2 FT
FT. OR N.
APPROXIMATE BASE FLOW WATER LEVEL
X12
4
IN.
D50 OF STABILIZED OUTLET STONEN.IPERVIOUS STOVE
X2
-VARA�E VALl6
DMEMWtm(VlWNWE PFI IW DESIGNER)
TYPICAL LMT �ClapfiON
N.ORFT -E STAKE MCB.BR HYMN TOP OF BANK
X2
3
R.
W E STAKE SPA.QG
13IN
AKE DA MATE iWSEFL(M'SVA
%/
4
W STAKE PI-AC38Tf Fl70MNT aIANC
X4
Xg
3Ja
LIVE STAKE— W-1—FAF—ILE)
M
IN
CF LINE SiA(=MOGROIAD
.1
t-
WESTAKE DA IMIXMMAIO MFI.tM A
LIVE STAKE. TYP.
(SEE DETAIL, SHEET 2)
X3
X2
X5
TEMPORARY STABILIZED OUTLET - SECTION A -
70—PUMP AROUND STREAM DIVERSION
Not to Scale
to
CONTROL MATTING,
FIED (SEE NOTE 182)
INSTALLED LIVE STAKE DETAIL
APPROXIMATE
BASE FLOW
WATER LEVEL
PLAN VIEW
(SEE NOTE 8)
II
MAW
:1
TREES ANODR SHIM=
.DRIP UNE (SEE NOTES)
PHOTO: LIVE STAKES INSTALLED OVER EROSION
CONTROL FABRIC
X7
SQUARE CUT TOP
— TOP OF BANK
BUDS FACING
UPWARDS
ANGLECUT
45 DEGREES
X5
TOE OF BANK
LIVE STAKE DETAIL
TOP OF BANK
(TIE TO TEMPORARY
STABILIZED OUTLET)
NOTES:
1. ALL CHANNEL WORK INVOLVING EXCAVATION SHALL BE PERFORMED IN DRY CONDITIONS OR IN
CHANNEL SECTIONS ISOLATED BY IMPERVIOUS DIKES AND KEPT DE -WATERED.
2. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOT DISTURB MORE AREA THAN CAN BE STABILIZED THE SAME
WORKNGDAY.
3. PUMP-AROUN D PUMP AND HOSE SHALL ADEQUATELY CONVEY B/SEFLOW AS SPECIFIED BY
THEDESIGNER. DE -WATERING PUMP SHALL. ADEQUATELY DE -WATER THE WORKING ARFAAT
THE DOWNSTREAM IMPERVIOUS DIKE
4. GRAVITY -BASED GEOTEXDLE BAG FILTERS SHALL BE USEDTOCOLLECTSLTAND SEDIMENT
FROM WORK AREA DEWATERING. THE DESIGNER MAY SPECIFY A SEDIMENT BASH OR OTHER
SEDIMENT CONTROL MEASURE IN LIEU OF A SEDIENT BAG F SDE CONDFI IONS ARE
FAVORABLE (IF - TRFFS WILL NOT OF IMPACTED FOR BASIN FXCAVATIO N. ETC.).
5. EFFLUENT FROM CLEAN WATER PUMP AROUND MAY BE DISCHARGED DIRECTLY INTO
STABILIZED OUTLET (NO SEDIMENT REMOVAL DEVICE REQUIRED).
8. A STABILIZED OUTLET SHALL BE USED TO CONTROL THE EFFLUENT FROM ALL PUMPING
OPERATIONS. THE DESIGNER SHALL SPECIFY ALL MATERIALS AND DIMENSIONS ASSOCIATED
WITH STABILIZED OUTLETS
7. FILTER FABRIC AS SPECIFIED BY THE DESIGNER SHALL BE USED UNDERNEATH ALL STONERIP
RAP PLACED FOR SEDIMENT BAGS, STABILIZED OUTLETS, SPLASH PADS,
8. IMPERVIOUS DIKES SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED TO ISOLATE THE IN -STREAM WORKING AREA AN
IMPERVIOUS FABRIC MEMBRANE AND SAND BAGS OR STONE. AS SPECIFIED BY THE DESIGNER,
SHALL BE USED TO CREATE THE DIKES
S. THE WORK SEQUENCE IN PUMP -AROUND OPERATIONS PROCEEDS TYPICALLY AS FOLLOWS:
A INSTALL SEDIMENT REMOVAL DEVICE AND TEMPORARY STABLUED OUTLETS AT THE
DOWNSTREAM END OF WORKING AREA.
8.INSTALL PUMP AROUND PUMP AND FLEXILE HOSE -
C.
INSTALL UPSTREAM IMPERVIOUS DICE AND BEGIN PUMPING (CLEAN WATER) DOWNSTREAM
TO LIZ
STASED OUTLET.
D. INSTALL DOWNSTREAM IMPERVIOUS DOE AND DEWATERING PUMP.
E. PERFORM CHANNEL WORK N ACCORDANCE WITH THE PLANS IN THE WORKING AREA
F. DE -WATER THE WORKING AREA (AS NEEDED) INTO THE SEDIMENT REMOVAL DEVICE AND
TEMPORARY STAB42ED OUTLET.
G. UPON COMPLETION OF WORK REMOVE ANY SEDIMENT ACCUMULATION BEHIND
IMPERVIOUS ONES.
H. REMOVE DOWNSTREAM AND THEN UPSTREAM DICESANDALL PUMPS AND HOSE
I. SEED AND MULCH ALL DISTURBED AREAS PER THE PLAITING PUN.
NOTES:
1. LIVE STAKES SHALL BE INSTALLED ON FINISHED STREAM BANKS. 'FINISHED' GENERALLY REFERS TOAAYANDiOR ALL OF
THE FOLLOWING AS SPECIFIED SYTHE DESIGNER:
A. GRADED
B. PREPARED(ROTO-TLLED. RAKED, AND AMENDED),
C. SEEDED,
D. MULCHED,AND
E. COVERED WITH EROSION CONTROL MATTING.
2. INFORMATION REGARDING ACTIVITIES REWIRED TO FINISH THE STREAM BANKS SHALL BE ADDED TO THE LIVE STAKING
DETAIL OR DETAILED SEPARATELY AND REFERENCED HEREIN.
3. LIVE STAKES SHALL BE OF THE SIZE SPECIFIED BY THE DESIGNER AND PLACED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PATTERN AND
SPACING DESIGNATED BY THE DESIGNER.
4. LIVE STAKES SHALL BE FASHIONED FROM DORMANT CUTTINGS OF WOODY PLANT SPECIES (TREES AND SHRUBS)
SPECIFIED BY THE DESIGNER AND SHOWN IN THIS DETAILED IN A TABLE OR ELSEWHERE IN THE PLANS (EG. -A PLANTING
PLAN).
S. LIVE STAKE SPACING AND PLACEMENT MAY VARY, AS SPECIFIED BY THE DESIGNER. AT DIFFERENT LOCATIONS ALONG THE
STREAM, SUCH AS ON STREAM BANKS THROUGH RIFFLE SECTIONS OR ON STREAM BANKS ALONG THE OUTSIDE OF
MEANDER BENDS.
S. LINE STAKES SHALL NOT BE PLACED WITHIN THE DRP UNE OF ANY EXISTING TREES ANDAXR SHRUBS THAT REMAIN ON
THE BANKS.
7. DETAILED HANDLING, PREPARATION, AND INSTALLATION GUIDELINES FOR LME STAKES SHALL BE SPECIFIED SYTFE
DESIGNER, INCLUWNG:
A LIVE STAKES SHALL BE CUT AND INSTALLED ON THE SAME DAY UNLESS OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR IN THE
SPECIFICATIONS.
B. ALL LATERAL BRANCHES SHALL BE CAREFULLY REMOVED FROM THE WOODYCUTTINGS PRIOR TO INSTALLATION.
C. LIVE STAKES SHALL BE DRIVEN INTO THE GROUND USING A -DEAD STOW PLASTIC HAMMER, BY CREATING
PILOT HOLE AND SLIPPING THE STAKE INTO IT. OR WITH THE USE OFA HYDRAULIC INJECTION SYSTEM SOL
SHALL BE FIRMLY PACKED AROUND THE HOLE AFTER INSTALLATION.
D. LIVE STAKES SHALL BE TAMPED IN AT A RIGHT ANGLE TO THE GROUND WITH BETWEEN 70%-80%OF THE STAKE
INSTALLED BELOW THE GROUND SURFACE
E. BETWEEN 20%_30% AND TWO BUDS (OR PRUNED. LATERAL BRANCH LOCATIONS) ON THE LIVE STAKE SHALL BE
ABOVE THE GROUND SURFACE
F. SPLIT OR OTHERWISE DAMAGED LIVE STAKES SHALL NOT BE USED.
S. THE PLAN VIEW ILLUSTRATES A PERPENDICULAR PERSPECTIVE OF EACH SURFACE DEPICTED IN THE CROSS SECTION.
THERE IS NO FORESHORTENING OF THE STREAM BANK (OR ANY OTHER SLOPED SURFACE) IN THE RAN NEW.
�.` 4NRLDA 80( /4i
?O��EESS/Qti fir t
SEA
hpi1�^At�
Dec 13 2017 5:18 PM
i
5
I�
IFI
U
LIVE STAKING
8 - v7
Not to Scale Uoc

Drawing name: K:\CHL—PRJ\015016 City of Chorlotte\181 City View\Codd\PlonSheets\C-7.1 CROSS SECTIONS.dwg C-7.1 CROSS SECTIONS Dec 12, 2017 1:
wotTP.k 45hcW6!"N4REl"6 SML•!lt•9e'P. doajs^vlrgMLtly96t4c••)w bteesst5E13R1iNsk h7ee2+haYr tn!KPatFI !BD35M,idknt fa. `lb IM>c!rueV�DWaanY^61^^Edandntelglelr•cve�^N2N°��ev1d"lw�h91V14
p g N OI O A Ou N
Etl MMUM
8
O
— A•rockt•e. Inc. -11 M rill-! IftAlty to KMWy- aid A kta ft.
vnill
N
O
SHEET
015016181
JOB
AS NOTED
SCALE
"',t','�r„�
\0. DnTF. 3Y DESCRIPTION
Plans Prepared By:
•
-gal
CITY VIEW
n N 9
Kimleyl Horn
CAD Fit £PATH
n 3� "a o o
Q 2a17
NC LICENSE NO. F411102
KJH
JCD
YKCPAHLU 87'
or
CI ILCKI:U OY
-+ i 0 �� ^�
CROSS SECTIONS
'ry'o s^ +rte
�rh
Suite
200 South TryonStreet,Carolina
M.
JCD
tznl/2017
18
3 qunnsr�
Charlotte, North Carolina 282U2
A14ROYtU OY
UAIL
Phone: [phone]
HIM
O
— A•rockt•e. Inc. -11 M rill-! IftAlty to KMWy- aid A kta ft.
vnill
N
O
SHEET
015016181
JOB
AS NOTED
SCALE
"',t','�r„�
\0. DnTF. 3Y DESCRIPTION
Plans Prepared By:
•
-gal
CITY VIEW
n N 9
Kimleyl Horn
CAD Fit £PATH
n 3� "a o o
Q 2a17
NC LICENSE NO. F411102
KJH
JCD
YKCPAHLU 87'
or
CI ILCKI:U OY
-+ i 0 �� ^�
CROSS SECTIONS
'ry'o s^ +rte
�rh
Suite
200 South TryonStreet,Carolina
M.
JCD
tznl/2017
18
3 qunnsr�
Charlotte, North Carolina 282U2
A14ROYtU OY
UAIL
Phone: [phone]

name: K:\CHL-PRJ\015016 City of Chorlotte\181 City VIeW\Codd\PlonSheets\C-7.1 CROSS SECTIONS.dwg C-7.2 CROSS SECTIONS Dec 12, 2017 1
Iha"OMNfi 24he SKMISP. dIlm^41PAP�'Ltlt06t!"C^ J'.°24k99919f94kAi9° 4114�°A,9Mx 112!ME91^Na°Ot!O�!369rH1C^t N!'Qt!klt.X11!'FW'J�6aBA°i°61^L74EM9Me'!ME'%°6H3�"hll7PlCElldtl�aFlHV
-3iiiai
V
+
N
V
+
O
0
CRE94.9°eELH ft!QBft-H= ad A—r°t°.. i"a "I w Wlt wt r elrtr to KmNy-� ,"a Au *tw
O O O N N tp O O O
OI O A W N Or O A al___O__A W
0
0
9MMEIMM Z0
92002■
O
O
O
AS NOTED
scnl.F
V
O O
A
M
N
O
SHEET
015(y18181
ion No.
AS NOTED
scnl.F
try
wej�
S0. DATE BY DESCRUMON
Plans Prepared By:
C-7°2�
CITY VIEW
g'
° °"
N n B� Z
Kimley}� Horn
�
CAD FII.F. PATH
p zO N H
Ln tet" o�
Q 201-1
NC LICENSE NO. F-0102
—
KJH
JCD
SECTIONS
¢DaiY
200 South? on Street, Suite 200
M L .PxcPAxmeY
ncutzccxt
1O
rA�rc t111tr1�Ats� �
Charlotte, North Carolina 28202
APJCL,LDBI
o
DAIF
Phone: [phone]CROSS

name: K:\CHL-PRJ\015016 City of Charlotte\181 City Vlew\Codd\Plan Sheets\C-7.1 CROSS SECTIONS.dwg C-7.3 CROSS SECTIONS Dec
Rd9st{^•NEk2Jn•svr�elt5pP.9fem^vlr Lag,kcl�C�n3l'eao�s�sfearans•k)nhrhe>�r g2tnq lrteaw,oe!1"rol•tW\ek!It�jMep05Raft obn1tri®wenre�pllewam�nWEM
wiw
r
+
N
117
MMM "aawwww1
W
0
N
+
O
rn rn m
rn
rn
rn
m
Orno N aVi
O
A
u
rn rn m
m N m
0160161a1
AS NOTED
y0. DATE BY DRSCRIVrION
Plans Prepared By:
C-7.3
CITT VIEW
n
O ��
s a a
0, c '"tn o o g
9��'
Kider Horn
Q 2017
NC LICENSE NO. F-0102
��`V�
—
CAD TII.F DATH
Ot.
KJH
CCD
YaIiYAlIIU aY
CROSS SECTIONS
11"C1,111111
�O �'
200 South Tryon Street, Suite 200
CIMMM.
CCD
1zMnm
Ig
(laY�tghp
Charlotte, North Carolina 2X202
AYF7lUVhU UY
llA IL
Phone: [phone]

Jurisdictional Determination Request
US Army Corps
of Engineers
Wilmington District
This form is intended for use by anyone requesting a jurisdictional determination (JD) from the
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Wilmington District (Corps). Please include all supporting
information, as described within each category, with your request. You may submit your request
via mail, electronic mail, or facsimile. Requests should be sent to the appropriate project
manager of the county in which the property is located. A current list of project managers by
assigned counties can be found on-line at:
h=://www. saw.usace.army.mil/Missions/RegulatoryPennitProp-ram/Contact/CountyLocator.aspx,
by calling 910-251-4633, or by contacting any of the field offices listed below. Once your
request is received you will be contacted by a Corps project manager.
ASHEVILLE & CHARLOTTE REGULATORY
FIELD OFFICES
US Army Corps of Engineers
151 Patton Avenue, Room 208
Asheville, North Carolina 28801-5006
General Number: [phone]
Fax Number: [phone]
RALEIGH REGULATORY FIELD OFFICE
US Army Corps of Engineers
3331 Heritage Trade Drive, Suite 105
Wake Forest, North Carolina 27587
General Number: [phone]
Fax Number: [phone]
INSTRUCTIONS:
WASHINGTON REGULATORY FIELD OFFICE
US Army Corps of Engineers
2407 West Fifth Street
Washington, North Carolina 27889
General Number: [phone]
Fax Number: [phone]
WILMINGTON REGULATORY FIELD OFFICE
US Army Corps of Engineers
69 Darlington Avenue
Wilmington, North Carolina 28403
General Number: 910-251-4633
Fax Number: [phone]
All requestors must complete Parts A, B, C, D, E, F and G.
NOTE TO CONSULTANTS AND AGENCIES: If you are requesting a JD on behalf of a
paying client or your agency, please note the specific submittal requirements in Part H.
NOTE ON PART D — PROPERTY OWNER AUTHORIZATION: Please be aware that
all JD requests must include the current property owner authorization for the Corps to
proceed with the determination, which may include inspection of the property when
necessary. This form must be signed by the current property owner(s) or the owner(s)
authorized agent to be considered a complete request.
NOTE ON PART D - NCDOT REQUESTS: Property owner authorization/notification for
JD requests associated with North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT)
projects will be conducted according to the current NCDOT/USACE protocols.
NOTE TO USDA PROGRAM PARTICIPANTS: A Corps approved or preliminary JD
may not be valid for the wetland conservation provisions of the Food Security Act of
1985. If you or your tenant are USDA Program participants, or anticipate participation in
USDA programs, you should also request a certified wetland determination from the local
office of the Natural Resources Conservation Service, prior to starting work.
Version: May 2017 Page 1

Jurisdictional Determination Request
A. PARCEL INFORMATION
Street Address: Dion Avenue and Dorn Circle
City, State:
Charlotte, NC
County: Mecklenbu
Parcel Index Number(s) (PIN): City of Charlotte and Right of Entry Agreement
B. REQUESTOR INFORMATION
Name: Erin Shanaberqer, WPIT
Mailing Address: City of Charlotte, 600 East Fourth Street
Telephone Number:
Charlotte, NC 28202
704-562-2691
Electronic Mail Address: [e-mail]
Select one:
❑ I am the current property owner.
❑ I am an Authorized Agent or Environmental Consultant'
Interested Buyer or Under Contract to Purchase
aOther, please explain. Easement holder
C. PROPERTY OWNER INFORMATION
Name: Multiple Parcels (PID# 16504227 & 16507167)
Mailing Address:
Telephone Number:
Electronic Mail Address:
' Must provide completed Agent Authorization Form/Letter.
2 Documentation of ownership also needs to be provided with request (copy of Deed, County GIS/Parcel/Tax Record).
Version: May 2017 Page 2

Jurisdictional Determination Request
D. PROPERTY ACCESS CERTIFICATION 1,4
By signing below, I authorize representatives of the Wilmington District, U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers (Corps) to enter upon the property herein described for the purpose of conducting on-
site investigations, if necessary, and issuing a jurisdictional determination pursuant to Section
404 of the Clean Water Act and/or Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of 1899. I, the
undersigned, am either a duly authorized owner of record of the property identified herein, or
acting as the duly authorized agent of the owner of record of the property.
Erin Shanaberger, WPIT
Print Name
Capacity: ❑✓ Owner [:]Authorized Agents
12/20/2017
Date
Signature
E. REASON FOR JD REQUEST: (Check as many as applicable)
❑ I intend to construct/develop a project or perform activities on this parcel which would be
designed to avoid all aquatic resources.
❑ I intend to construct/develop a project or perform activities on this parcel which would be
designed to avoid all jurisdictional aquatic resources under Corps authority.
I intend to construct/develop a projector perform activities on this parcel which may
require authorization from the Corps, and the JD would be used to avoid and minimize
impacts to jurisdictional aquatic resources and as an initial step in a future permitting
process.
✓❑ I intend to construct/develop a project or perform activities on this parcel which may
require authorization from the Corps; this request is accompanied by my permit application
and the JD is to be used in the permitting process.
❑ I intend to construct/develop a project or perform activities in a navigable water of the
U.S. which is included on the district Section 10 list and/or is subject to the ebb and flow of
the tide.
8 A Corps JD is required in order obtain my local/state authorization.
I intend to contest jurisdiction over a particular aquatic resource and request the Corps
confirm that jurisdiction does/does not exist over the aquatic resource on the parcel.
❑ I believe that the site may be comprised entirely of dry land.
Other:
For NCDOT requests following the current NCDOT/USACE protocols, skip to Part E.
If there are multiple parcels owned by different parties, please provide the following for each additional parcel on a
continuation sheet.
s Must provide agent authorization form/letter signed by owner(s).
Version: May 2017 Page 3

jurisdictional Determination Request
F. JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION (JD) TYPE (Select One)
I am requesting that the Corps provide a preliminary JD for the property identified herein.
A Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination (PJD) provides an indication that there may
be "waters of the United States" or "navigable waters of the United States"on a property.
PJDs are sufficient as the basis for permit decisions. For the purposes of permitting, all
waters and wetlands on the property will be treated as if they are jurisdictional "waters of
the United States". PJDs cannot be appealed (33 C.F.R. 331.2); however, a PJD is
"preliminary" in the sense that an approved JD can be requested at any time. PJDs do
not expire.
❑ I am requesting that the Corps provide an approved JD for the property identified herein.
An Approved Jurisdictional Determination (AJD) is a determination that
jurisdictional "waters of the United States" or "navigable waters of the United
States" are either present or absent on a site. An approved JD identifies the limits of
waters on a site determined to be jurisdictional under the Clean Water Act and/or
Rivers and Harbors Act. Approved JDs are sufficient as the basis for permit
decisions. AJDs are appealable (33 C.F.R. 331.2). The results of the AJD will be
posted on the Corps website. A landowner, permit applicant, or other "affected
party" (33 C.F.R. 331.2) who receives an AJD may rely upon the AJD for five years
(subject to certain limited exceptions explained in Regulatory Guidance Letter 05-
02).
❑ I am unclear as to which JD I would like to request and require additional information
to inform my decision.
G. ALL REQUESTS
Map of Property or Project Area. This Map must clearly depict the boundaries of the
review area.
✓❑ Size of Property or Review Area 1.48 acres.
❑ The property boundary (or review area boundary) is clearly physically marked on the site.
Version: May 2017 Page 4

Jurisdictional Determination Request
H. REQUESTS FROM CONSULTANTS
a
Project Coordinates (Decimal Degrees): Latitude:
35.179128
Longitude: -80.747846
A legible delineation map depicting the aquatic resources and the property/review area.
Delineation maps must be no larger than 11 x 17 and should contain the following: (Corps
signature of submitted survey plats will occur after the submitted delineation map has been
reviewed and approved).6
■ North Arrow
■ Graphical Scale
■ Boundary of Review Area
■ Date
■ Location of data points for each Wetland Determination Data Form or tributary
assessment reach.
For Approved Jurisdictional Determinations:
■ Jurisdictional wetland features should be labeled as Wetland Waters of the US, 404
wetlands, etc. Please include the acreage of these features.
■ Jurisdictional non -wetland features (i.e. tidal/navigable waters, tributaries,
impoundments) should be labeled as Non -Wetland Waters of the US, stream, tributary,
open water, relatively permanent water, pond, etc. Please include the acreage or linear
length of each of these features as appropriate.
■ Isolated waters, waters that lack a significant nexus to navigable waters, or non -
jurisdictional upland features should be identified as Non -Jurisdictional. Please
include a justification in the label regarding why the feature is non jurisdictional (i.e.
"Isolated", "No Significant Nexus", or "Upland Feature"). Please include the acreage
or linear length of these features as appropriate.
For Preliminary Jurisdictional Determinations:
Wetland and non -wetland features should not be identified as Jurisdictional, 404,
Waters of the United States, or anything that implies jurisdiction. These features can be
identified as Potential Waters of the United States, Potential Non -wetland Waters of
the United States, wetland, stream, open water, etc. Please include the acreage and
linear length of these features as appropriate.
Completed Wetland Determination Data Forms for appropriate region
(at least one wetland and one upland form needs to be completed for each wetland type)
6 Please refer to the guidance document titled "Survey Standards for Jurisdictional Determinations" to ensure that the
supplied map meets the necessary mapping standards. http://www.saw.usace.army.mil/Missions/Reeulatory-Permit-
Pro Rram/Jurisdiction/
Version: May 2017 Page 5

Jurisdictional Determination Request
Completed appropriate Jurisdictional Determination form
• PJDs, please complete a Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination Form' and include the
Aquatic Resource Table
• AJDs• please complete an Approved Jurisdictional Determination Forms
✓A Vicinity Map
0 Aerial Photograph
FYI USGS Topographic Map
Soil Survey Map
Other Maps, as appropriate (e.g. National Wetland Inventory Map, Proposed Site
Plan, previous delineation maps, LIDAR maps, FEMA floodplain maps)
0 Landscape Photos (if taken)
NCSAM and/or NCWAM Assessment Forms and Rating Sheets
aNC Division of Water Resources Stream Identification Forms
Other Assessment Forms
' www.saw.usace.army.mil/Portals/59/docs/reeulatory/regdocs/JD/RGL 08-02 App A Prelim JD Form fellable pdf
s Please see htty://www.saw.usace.army.mil/Missions/Regulatory-Permit-Pro2ram/Jurisdiction/
Principal Purpose: The information that you provide will be used in evaluating your request to determine
whether there are any aquatic resources within the project area subject to federal jurisdiction under the regulatory
authorities referenced above.
Routine Uses: This information may be shared with the Department of Justice and other federal, state, and local
government agencies, and the public, and may be made available as part of a public notice as required by federal
law. Your name and property location where federal jurisdiction is to be determined will be included in the
approved jurisdictional determination (AJD), which will be made available to the public on the District's website
and on the Headquarters USAGE website.
Disclosure: Submission of requested information is voluntary; however, if information is not provided, the
request for an AJD cannot be evaluated nor can an AJD be issued.
Version: May 2017 Page 6

Appendix 2 - PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION (PJD) FORM
A. REPORT COMPLETION DATE FOR PJD:
B. NAME AND ADDRESS OF PERSON REQUESTING PJD: Erin Shanaberger, 600 East Fourth St. CLT, NC 28202
C. DISTRICT OFFICE, FILE NAME, AND NUMBER:
D. PROJECT LOCATION(S) AND BACKGROUND INFORMATION:
(USE THE TABLE BELOW TO DOCUMENT MULTIPLE AQUATIC RESOURCES AND/OR
AQUATIC RESOURCES AT DIFFERENT SITES)
State: NC County/parish/borough: Mecklenburg city: Charlotte
Center coordinates of site (lat/long in degree decimal format):
Lat.: 35.179128 Long.: -80.747846
Universal Transverse Mercator:
Name of nearest waterbody: UT to Campbell Creek
E. REVIEW PERFORMED FOR SITE EVALUATION (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY):
❑ Office (Desk) Determination. Date:
❑ Field Determination. Date(s):
TABLE OF AQUATIC RESOURCES IN REVIEW AREA WHICH "MAY BE" SUBJECT TO REGULATORY
JURISDICTION.
Site
number
Latitude
(decimal
degrees)
Longitude
(decimal
degrees)
Estimated amount
of aquatic resource
in review area
(acreage and linear
feet, if applicable)
Type of aquatic
resource (i.e., wetland
vs. non -wetland
waters)
Geographic authority
to which the aquatic
resource "may be"
subject (i.e., Section
404 or Section 10/404)
S1
35.179121
-80.750117
1,235 If
non -wetland waters
Section 404
S2
35.179058
-80.749934
41 If
non -wetland waters
Section 404
S3
35.179176
-80.748211
64 If
non -wetland waters
Section 404

1) The Corps of Engineers believes that there may be jurisdictional aquatic resources in
the review area, and the requestor of this PJD is hereby advised of his or her option
to request and obtain an approved JD (AJD) for that review area based on an
informed decision after having discussed the various types of JDs and their
characteristics and circumstances when they may be appropriate.
2) In any circumstance where a permit applicant obtains an individual permit, or a
Nationwide General Permit (NWP) or other general permit verification requiring "pre -
construction notification" (PCN), or requests verification for a non -reporting NWP or
other general permit, and the permit applicant has not requested an AJD for the
activity, the permit applicant is hereby made aware that: (1) the permit applicant has
elected to seek a permit authorization based on a PJD, which does not make an
official determination of jurisdictional aquatic resources; (2) the applicant has the
option to request an AJD before accepting the terms and conditions of the permit
authorization, and that basing a permit authorization on an AJD could possibly result
in less compensatory mitigation being required or different special conditions; (3) the
applicant has the right to request an individual permit rather than accepting the terms
and conditions of the NWP or other general permit authorization; (4) the applicant can
accept a permit authorization and thereby agree to comply with all the terms and
conditions of that permit, including whatever mitigation requirements the Corps has
determined to be necessary; (5) undertaking any activity in reliance upon the subject
permit authorization without requesting an AJD constitutes the applicant's acceptance
of the use of the PJD; (6) accepting a permit authorization (e.g., signing a proffered
individual permit) or undertaking any activity in reliance on any form of Corps permit
authorization based on a PJD constitutes agreement that all aquatic resources in the
review area affected in any way by that activity will be treated as jurisdictional, and
waives any challenge to such jurisdiction in any administrative or judicial compliance
or enforcement action, or in any administrative appeal or in any Federal court; and (7)
whether the applicant elects to use either an AJD or a PJD, the JD will be processed
as soon as practicable. Further, an AJD, a proffered individual permit (and all terms
and conditions contained therein), or individual permit denial can be administratively
appealed pursuant to 33 C.F.R. Part 331. If, during an administrative appeal, it
becomes appropriate to make an official determination whether geographic
jurisdiction exists over aquatic resources in the review area, or to provide an official
delineation of jurisdictional aquatic resources in the review area, the Corps will
provide an AJD to accomplish that result, as soon as is practicable. This PJD finds
that there "may be"waters of the U.S. and/or that there "may be" navigable waters of
the U.S. on the subject review area, and identifies all aquatic features in the review
area that could be affected by the proposed activity, based on the following
information:

SUPPORTING DATA. Data reviewed for PJD (check all that apply)
Checked items should be included in subject file. Appropriately reference sources
below where indicated for all checked items:
Maps, plans, plots or plat submitted by or on behalf of the PJD requestor:
Map:
■❑ Data sheets prepared/submitted by or on behalf of the PJD requestor.
❑ Office concurs with data sheets/delineation report.
❑ Office does not concur with data sheets/delineation report. Rationale:
❑ Data sheets prepared by the Corps:
❑ Corps navigable waters' study:
❑ U.S. Geological Survey Hydrologic Atlas:
❑ USGS NHD data.
❑ USGS 8 and 12 digit HUC maps.
■❑ U.S. Geological Survey map(s). Cite scale & quad name:
1:24,000; Charlotte East
■❑ Natural Resources Conservation Service Soil Survey. Citation: NRcs ssURco sods - Mecklenburg county
❑ National wetlands inventory map(s). Cite name:
❑ State/local wetland inventory map(s):
❑ FEMA/FIRM maps:
❑ 100 -year Floodplain Elevation is: .(National Geodetic Vertical Datum of 1929)
■❑ Photographs: ■❑ Aerial (Name & Date): 2017 Mecklenburg County Aerial
or ■❑ Other (Name & Date): Site photographs, December 2017
■❑ Previous determination (s). File no. and date of response letter: SAW -2012-00228; 1-2-2013
❑ Other information (please specify):
IMPORTANT NOTE: The information recorded on this form has not necessarily
been verified by the Corps and should not be relied upon for later jurisdictional
determinations.
Signature and date of
Regulatory staff member
completing PJD
CnubtlsNeckhn6uy
STORM
'WATER
serviesv^
Erin Shanaberger
2017.12.27
15:25:47 -05'00'
Signature and date of
person requesting PJD
(REQUIRED, unless obtaining
the signature is impracticable)'
' Districts may establish timeframes for requestor to return signed PJD forms. If the requestor does not respond
within the established time frame, the district may presume concurrence and no additional follow up is
necessary prior to finalizing an action.

North Carolina Division of Water Quality - Stream Identification Form, Version 4.11
Date: 12/19/2017
Project/Site- City View Stream Restoration/
S1 -UT to Campbell Creek
Latitude: 35.179121
Evaluator: Chris Tinklenberg, PWS
County: Mecklenburg
Longitude: -80.750117
Total Points: 40.5
0
1
2
Stream Determination (cir
Other
Charlotte East
Stream is at least intermittent
Ephemeral Intermitten erennial
e.g. Quad Name:
if >_ 19 or perennial if >_ 30
3
3
A. Geomorphology Subtotal = 23
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
Score
1 a. Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
3
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
2
3
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool, ripple-
poolsequence
0
1
2
3
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
2
3
3
5. Active/relic floodplain
0
1
2
3
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1
2
3
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
2
3
2
8. Headcuts
0
1
2
3
0
9. Grade control
0
0.5
1
1.5
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
0.5
1
1.5
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
No = 0
Yes = 3
0
a artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hvdroloqv Subtotal = 11.5
12.
Presence of Baseflow
0
1
2
3
3
13.
Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
1
2
3
2
14.
Leaf litter
1.5
1
0.5
0
1.5
15.
Sediment on plants or debris
0
0.5
1
1.5
1
16.
Organic debris lines or piles
0
0.5
1
1.5
1
17.
Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
1.5
Yes = 3
26. Wetland plants in streambed
3
C. Bioloqy Subtotal = 6
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3 2
1
0
3
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3 2
1
0
3
20. Macrobenthos note diversity and abundance
0 1
2
3
0
21. Aquatic Mollusks
0 1
2
3
0
22. Fish
0 0.5
1
1.5
0
23. Crayfish
0 0.5
1
1.5
0
24. Amphibians
0 0.5
1
1.5
0
25. Algae
0 0.5
1
1.5
0
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5; Other = 0
0
'perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes:

North Carolina Division of Water Quality - Stream Identification Form, Version 4.11
Date: 12/19/2017
Project/Site: City View Strre2aU Restoration/
ST
Latitude: 35.179058
Evaluator: Chris Tinklenberg, PWS
County: Mecklenburg
Longitude: -80.749934
Total Points: 33.5
Stream Determination (cir
Other
Stream is at least intermittent
Ephemeral Intermitten Perennial
e.g. Quad Name: Charlotte East
if >_ 19 or perennial if z 30
0
1
A. Geomorphology Subtotal = 15
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
Score
1a. Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
3
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
2
3
1
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool, ripple-
poolsequence
0
1
2
3
1
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
2
3
3
5. Active/relic floodplain
0
1
2
3
2
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1
2
3
2
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
2
3
2
8. Headcuts
0
1
2
3
0
9. Grade control
0
0.5
1
1.5
0
10. Natural valley
0
0.5
1
1.5
1
11. Second or greater order channel
No = 0
Yes = 3
0
a artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hydrology Subtotal = 12.5
12.
Presence of Baseflow
0
1
2
3
3
13.
Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
1
2
3
3
14.
Leaf litter
1.5
1
0.5
0
1.5
15.
Sediment on plants or debris
0
0.5
1
1.5
1
16.
Organic debris lines or piles
0
0.5
1
1.5
1
17.
Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
1
Yes = 3
1
3
C. Biology Subtotal = 6
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
2
1
0
3
19.
Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
2
1
0
3
20.
Macrobenthos note diversity and abundance)
0
1
2
3
0
21.
Aquatic Mollusks
0
1
2
3
0
22.
Fish
0
0.5
1
1.5
0
23.
Crayfish
0
0.5
1
1.5
0
24.
Amphibians
0
0.5
1
1.5
0
25.
Algae
0
0.5
1
1.5
0
26.
Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5; Other = 0
0
`perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes:

North Carolina Division of Water Quality - Stream Identification Form, Version 4.11
Date: 12/19/2017
Project/Site- City View Stream Restoration/
Latitude: 35.179176
Evaluator: Chris Tinklenberg, PWS
County: Mecklenburg
Longitude: -80.748211
Total Points: 20.5
Stream Deter (circle one)
Other
Stream is at least intermittent
Ephemeral termitten Perennial
e.g. Quad Name: Charlotte East
if >_ 19 or perennial if z 30
0
1
A. Geomorphology Subtotal = 8
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
Scorer
1 a. Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
3
2
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
2
3
1
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool, ripple-
poolsequence
0
1
2
3
1
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
2
3
1
5. Active/relic floodplain
0
1
2
3
1
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1
2
3
1
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
2
3
1
8. Headcuts
0
1
2
3
0
9. Grade control
0
0.5
1
1.5
0
10. Natural valley
0
0.5
1
1.5
0
11. Second or greater order channel
No = 0
Yes
= 3
0
a artificial ditches are not rated, see discussions in manual
B. HydroloqV Subtotal = 7.5
12.
Presence of Baseflow
0
1
2
3
2
13.
Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
1
2
3
1
14.
Leaf litter
1.5
1
0.5
0
1
15.
Sediment on plants or debris
0
0.5
1
1.5
0.5
16.
Organic debris lines or piles
0
0.5
1
1.5
0
17.
Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No =
0
Yes = 3
26. Wetland plants in streambed
3
C. Biology Subtotal =
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3 2
1
0
2
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3 2
1
0
3
20. Macrobenthos note diversity and abundance
0 1
2
3
0
21. Aquatic Mollusks
0 1
2
3
0
22. Fish
0 0.5
1
1.5
0
23. Crayfish
0 0.5
1
1.5
0
24. Amphibians
0 0.5
1
1.5
0
25. Algae
0 0.5
1
1.5
0
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75; OBL =
1.5; Other = 0
0
`perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes:

Pnoto rage s
�t t
,a
�M'�`
Photo 5: S3 facing upstream from the confluence with S 1
f
,
r
O'
V
3
,, {,•
L
a.
Photo 6: S3 facing upstream at 30 -inch CMP culvert entering the project boundary
Title
Photo Pages
Prepared For
City View Stream Restoration Project
Prepared By
Project
Charlotte, Mecklenburg County, North Carolina
1711ttIA1171'_
Klmley Morn
Date Project Number
'"'
12/20/17 015016181

noto rage 4
Photo 7: S1 —UT to Campbell Creek (Reach 3) facing downstream near the upper end
of the t)roiect boundary
-W4
1%
Photo 8: SI —UT to Campbell Creek (Reach 3) facing upstream from Dorn Circle
Title
Photo Pages
Prepared For
Project
City View Stream Restoration Project
Prepared By
0
Charlotte, Mecklenburg County, North Carolina
M
OWIllyffl:
Date
L
Project Number
Kimley)OHorn
12/20/17
015016181

�Y �sTNFq,
North Carolina Department of Natural and Cultural Resources
Natural Heritage Program
Governor Roy Cooper
December 20, 2017
Chris Tinklenberg
Kimley-Horn
200 South Tryon St.
Charlotte, NC 28202
RE: City View Stream Restoration
Dear Chris Tinklenberg:
Secretary Susi H. Hamilton
NCNHDE-4946
The North Carolina Natural Heritage Program (NCNHP) appreciates the opportunity to provide information
about natural heritage resources for the project referenced above.
A query of the NCNHP database, based on the project area mapped with your request, indicates that there are
no records for rare species, important natural communities, natural areas, or conservation/managed areas
within the proposed project boundary. Please note that although there may be no documentation of natural
heritage elements within the project boundary, it does not imply or confirm their absence; the area may not have
been surveyed. The results of this query should not be substituted for field surveys where suitable habitat exists.
In the event that rare species are found within the project area, please contact the NCNHP so that we may
update our records.
The attached 'Potential Occurrences' table summarizes rare species and natural communities that have been
documented within a one -mile radius of the property boundary. The proximity of these records suggests that
these natural heritage elements may potentially be present in the project area if suitable habitat exists and is
included for reference. Tables of natural areas and conservation/managed area within a one -mile radius of the
project area, if any, are also included in this report.
Please note that natural heritage element data are maintained for the purposes of conservation planning, project
review, and scientific research, and are not intended for use as the primary criteria for regulatory decisions.
Information provided by the NCNHP database may not be published without prior written notification to the
NCNHP, and the NCNHP must be credited as an information source in these publications. Maps of NCNHP
data may not be redistributed without permission.
The NC Natural Heritage Program may follow this letter with additional correspondence if a Dedicated Nature
Preserve (DNP), Registered Heritage Area (RHA), Clean Water Management Trust Fund (CWMTF) easement,
or Federally -listed species are documented near the project area.
If you have questions regarding the information provided in this letter or need additional assistance, please
contact Rodney A. Butler at rodney.butlerO-ncdcr.aov or 919.707.8603.
Sincerely,
NC Natural Heritage Program
MAILING ADDRESS: Telephone: (919) 7D7-8107 LOCATION_
1651 Mail Service Center www.ncnhp.org 121 West Jones Street
Raleigh, NC 27699-1651 Raleigh, NC 27603

Natural Heritage Element Occurrences, Natural Areas, and Managed Areas Within a One -mile Radius of the Project Area
City View Stream Restoration
December 20, 2017
NCNHDE-4946
Element Occurrences Documented Within a One -mile Radius of the Project Area
Taxonomic EO ID Scientific Name Common Name Last Element Accuracy Federal State Global State
Group Observation Occurrence Status Status Rank Rank
Date Rank
Vascular Plant 13743 Delphinium exaltatum Tall Larkspur 1800s Hi? 5 -Very --- Endangered G3 S2
Low
No Natural Areas are Documented Within a One -mile Radius of the Project Area
Managed Areas Documented Within a One -mile Radius of the Project Area
Managed Area Name Owner
Mecklenburg County Open Space Mecklenburg County
Owner Type
Local Government
Definitions and an explanation of status designations and codes can be found at https://nenhde.natureserve.org/content/help. Data query generated on December 20, 2017; source: NCNHP, Q4 October 2017. Please resubmit
your information request if more than one year elapses before project initiation as new information is continually added to the NCNHP database.
Page 2 of 3

NCNHDE-4946: City View Stream Restoration
`
Nth
n•,r, Sharon _
Retldma Sixr�tie"
mase toIdevAld
c=am snr„�, 1
�-� hlarlwood bic;:•est Ra �y v�•y
rev¢
b�'n,tl
ahapn Memorel klbm v eae 4d rK,,a �ry o nrA�c nib.
h'a,F 6 Camabry
eeW
S"r_
hkch E
n't'afi msµ. - e � fig y..n�: � +i.fr `• s 12 JF
a
Rama
nn n„
t. �i 1, .C`vN � r�T,�ngb ne�° est vn.•t
Kr—1), Eaat y
1W,
4 h
E,elyn Macs, '
�"'8a°”^' IAIew11A
Sa,th ebmxnary
S r,
µd •y m �
Chip . 47 Mol At
Acaeamr ThomCbn
N
WL. H
S, East Forest -
December 20, 2017
❑ Project Boundary
0 Buffered Project Boundary
Managed Area (MAREA)
Page 3 of 3
1:20,851
0 0.175 0.35 0.7 mi
0 0.275 0.55 1.1 km
Sources: Esn, HERE. D.Lorme. Intermap. increment P Cap., GEBCO. USGS,
FAO, NPS, NRCAN, Ge,,Base, IGN. Katlastar NL, Ordnance Survey, Esn Japan,
METI, Esn China (Hong Kong), swiutopo. Mapmylnoia, ® Open5tr Wap
eontnbubra, and the GIS User Community