20120658 Ver 1_Restoration Plan_20121113

I I
I'EcoEngineering
- 1 A division of The John R. McAdams Company, Inc.
LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL
To: Mr. Eric Kulz
NC Division of Water Quality
WeBSCaPe Unit
Stream / Wetland Mitigation Coordinator
512 N. Salisbury St.,
Archdale Building - 9th floor
Raleigh, NC 27604
Re: Duke Water Reclamation Pond
DWQ # 20120658
STREAM RESTORATION PLAN
I am sending you the following item(s):
Date: November 13. 2012
** HAND DELIVER **
Job No.: DKU -08010
COPIES
DATE
NO.
DESCRIPTION
aL
Stream Restoration Plan Notebook w. Figures /Appendices
2
Large 24 x 36° Design Detail Sheet Plans
1
1
1
1 1 CD Copy of Design Detail Sheet Plans
These are transmitted as checked below:
I
Copy to:
As requested
For approval
For review and comment
'� 11
f''' Cii12
ei QUALITY
❑ For your
Signed:
Kevin Yates
Senior Enviro
FOR INTERNAL USE ONLY
® Copy Letter of Transmittal Only to File
❑ Copy Entire Document to File
2905 Meridian Parkway, Durham, North Carolina 27713
PO Box 14005, RTP, North Carolina 27709
Scientist

Stream Restoration Plan
for the Duke University
Water Reclamation Pond
DURHAM, NORTH CAROLINA
299
DKU -08010 N 0 V 1 33 20 e?
DENR - WATEP WiWY
October 2012
Angela Gardner
Water Resources Engineer
Kevin Yates
Senior Environmental Scientist

Restoration Plan • Duke University Water Reclamation Pond Stream Mitigation
USGS HUC 03030002 • Durham County, North Carolina • October 2012
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1.0 Introduction ................................................................................................. ............................... l
2.0 Project Goals and Objectives ....................................................................... ..............................4
3.0 Site Description ........................................................................................... ..............................5
3.1 Project Location ..................................................................................... ..............................5
3.2 Surface Waters ....................................................................................... ..............................5
4.0 General Watershed Description ................................................................... ..............................5
4.1 Proposed Project and Stormwater Controls ........................................... ..............................6
5.0 Existing Stream Conditions ........................................................................ ............................... 7
5.1 Existing Stream Geometry ..................................................................... ..............................8
5. 1.1 Stream Survey Methodology ........................................................ ..............................8
5.1.2 Bankfull Verification .................................................................... ..............................8
5.1.3 Stream Classification .................................................................... ..............................8
5.1.4 Channel Classification ................................................................. ............................... 9
5.2 Stream Substrate .................................................................................... ..............................9
5.3 Soils ....................................................................................................... ..............................9
5.4 Existing Plant Communities ................................................................. .............................10
5.5 Threatened and Endangered Species .................................................... .............................11
5.6 Cultural Resources ................................................................................ .............................12
6.0 Reference Reaches ...................................................................................... .............................12
6.1 Terrible Creek ....................................................................................... .............................13
7.0 Stream Channel Design .............................................................................. .............................13
7.1 Natural Channel Design ........................................................................ .............................13
7.2 Dimension ............................................................................................. .............................14
7.3 Pattern ................................................................................................... .............................14
7.4 Bed Form .............................................................................................. .............................14
7.5 Riparian Area ........................................................................................ .............................15
7.6 Stormwater ............................................................................................ .............................15
7.7 Stream Structures .................................................................................. .............................15
7.7.1 Rock -and -Roll Riffle ................................................................... .............................16
7.7.2 Toe Wood .................................................................................... .............................16
7.7.3 Rock Clusters ............................................................................... .............................16
7.7.4 Log Vane and Log Cross - Vanes .................................................. .............................16
8.0 Riparian Planting Plan ................................................................................ .............................16
9.0 Monitoring Plan .......................................................................................... .............................18
9.1 Stream Monitoring ................................................................................ .............................19
9. 1.1 Bankfull Events ........................................................................... .............................19
9.1.2 Longitudinal Profile ..................................................................... .............................19
9.1.3 Cross Sections .............................................................................. .............................19
9.1.4 Photograph Stations and Visual Monitoring ................................ .............................20
9.2 Vegetation Planting Monitoring ........................................................... .............................20
9.3 Long - Term Preservation Mechanism ................................................. .............................20
10.0 Success Criteria ........................................................................................ .............................20
10.1 Stream Success Criteria ...................................................................... .............................20
10.2 Vegetation Planting Success Criteria .................................................. .............................21
11.0 References ................................................................................................. .............................22
FFB]EcoEngineering
1 AdYmmof7Le John RMMdmCam ,I=

Restoration Plan • Duke University Water Reclamation Pond Stream Mitigation
USGS HUC 03030002 • Durham County, North Carolina • October 2012
In -Text Tables
Table 1. Proposed Stream Mitigation Units ( SMUs) ........................................ ..............................1
Table 2: HEC -RAS modeled existing hydrology and bankfull indicators ........ ..............................8
Table 3. Stream Substrate from Pebble Counts and Sieve Analysis ................ ..............................9
Table 3. Soils within 200 feet of Unnamed Tributary to Sandy Creek ........... .............................10
Table 4. Federally Protected Species .............................................................. ..............................1 l
Table 5. Federal Species of Concern ............................................................... .............................11
Table 7. Plant List ........................................................... 12
Appendix 1— Figures
Figure 1. USGS Quadrangle — Northwest/Southwest Durham
Figure 2. Durham County Soils Survey — Sheet 21
Figure 3. Vicinity Map: Proposed Water Reclamation Pond & Stream Exhibit w/. Inset 1
Figure 4. Conceptual Mitigation Plan
Figure 5. Drainage Area Map
Appendix 2 — Regulatory Records & Agency Letters
Natural Heritage Program
Wildlife Resource Commission
US Fish and Wildlife Service
NC State Historic Preservation Office
Stream Data Forms
Appendix 3 — Data Summary: Reference Reach / Existing Conditions / Proposed Design
Appendix 4 — Photos of Existing Stream Reaches
FE-J]EcoEngineering
11 A &vimn of The John R. McAdams Company, me

Restoration Plan • Duke University Water Reclamation Pond Stream Mitigation
USGS HUC 03030002 • Durham County, North Carolina • October 2012
With the integration of wetland benches within the proposed water reclamation pond and
stormwater management devices along the proposed stream restoration corridor, we are
proposing a 1.5:1 mitigation ratio to offset unavoidable impacts to 1,674 linear feet of
perennial stream associated with construction of the water reclamation pond. We are
proposing to restore 2,572 linear feet of perennial stream for a total of 2,572 linear feet of
restoration SMUs, and enhance 634 linear feet of perennial stream for a total of 151
SMUs.
EcoEngineering has been working closely with Duke University and their consultant
VHB, on the long -term plans for improvements along Campus Drive. The proposed
conservation easement to protect the mitigation project has offsets to accommodate future
widening along Campus Drive, which includes a greenway parallel to Campus Drive.
We have proposed a reduction of 4:1 SMUs where Campus Drive and/or the sewer
easement encroach into the 50 -foot riparian buffer.
Although this is an urbanized setting most of the impervious surface within the watershed
is built -out and there would be little to no new impervious surface draining to the
proposed project. The proposed restoration plan also incorporates stormwater
management devices, such as level - spreaders, plunge pools, and vernal pools where
stormwater runoff is currently untreated. The riparian areas will be planted with the
appropriate native riparian vegetation and will provide channel stability, flood
attenuation, and a vegetated buffer that will intercept overland stormwater. Species will
consist primarily of native trees and small shrubs of the Piedmont, listed in the planting
plan below.
The long -term preservation mechanism will be in the form of a Conservation Easement in
perpetuity. The Durham County Soil and Water Conservation District has agreed to hold
the Conservation Easement to provide, third -party, long -term assurance to the success of
the project.
Although permittee responsible mitigation is not the favored form of mitigation
according to the most recent Federal Mitigation Rule, Duke University has the experience
and resources to provide good quality, on -site mitigation, and ensure its long -term
success for the following reasons:
1) The proposed stream restoration project is within the same watershed as the
proposed impacts and both are upstream unnamed tributaries to Sandy Creek,
providing on -site, in -kind mitigation.
2) The proposed stream restoration project would tie directly into existing, downstream,
stream restoration projects providing approximately 13,000 linear feet of contiguous
riparian corridor for flora and fauna.
3) Duke University is a large, stable, and very well funded institution, with national and
international exposure that has a vested interest in seeing this mitigation plan be
highly successful.
[JEcoEngineering
A divis on of The Jdm It McAdams Company, Inc

Restoration Plan • Duke University Water Reclamation Pond Stream Mitigation
USGS HUC 03030002 • Durham County, North Carolina • October 2012
4) Duke has secured a long -term, third -party to help maintain the success of this
mitigation proposal and ensure it is compliant with its goals.
5) Although the proposed project is to be compliant with the Federal Mitigation Rule,
Duke has been pursuing on -site stream restoration since 2008, before finalization of
the Federal Mitigation Rule, before any approved mitigation within this HUC, and
four years of due diligence invested into pursuing on -site stream mitigation.
6) Duke University is also very engaged in research and monitoring efforts on their
stream restoration and stormwater management projects on campus, and sees this as
an exciting opportunity to continue these efforts within the same watershed.
An unnamed tributary to Sandy Creek has been selected for restoration by Duke University to
fulfill a portion of the compensatory mitigation requirements associated with the Individual
Permit for a water reclamation pond project. The goal of this restoration project is to modify the
current dimension, pattern and profile of an existing stream channel so it will be stable and self -
maintaining by utilizing natural channel design techniques and procedures. Duke University is
proposing to restore 2,572 linear feet of perennial stream for a total of 2,572 linear feet of
restoration SMUs, and enhance 634 linear feet of perennial stream for a total of 151 SMUs.
The site has been selected because of the highly degraded and poorly functioning state of the
unnamed tributary to Sandy Creek. The historic development of institutional, commercial, and
industrial facilities in the drainage area of the UT to Sandy Creek has aggravated the existing
erosion problem by increasing the runoff to the area. Development in this watershed threatens to
worsen a sediment pollution problem that contributes to water quality issues in Jordan Lake.
Based on site observations the degraded condition of the streams within the project area may be
the result of historic channelization, periodic dredging, and past vegetation maintenance
practices and to a lesser extent storm water runoff onto the site from the incremental increase in
impervious surface associated with urbanization.
The existing stream banks are generally denuded, actively eroding, and have a nearly vertical
profile. As a result, the banks are eroding, subsequently slumping, promoting lateral channel
migration, and asymmetrical meander creation. Most sections of channel have limited access to
the floodplain during peak flood flows. The channels do not have access to the floodplain during
bankfull events that typically occur in stable stream channel during the 1.5 to 2 year return
period storm (Leopold et al. 1992). The channels are in a highly incised state; therefore, flood
flows are constrained to the channel and the floodplain functions more as a terrace that is not
accessible at the bankfull elevation. The streams are in a progressive state of channel evolution
referred to as Stage III and Stage IV (Ward and Trimble, 2004). In some areas a new lower and
functional floodplain located at the bankfull elevation is beginning to take form within the
existing confined channel as a result of active stream bank erosion and bed degradation. Only
during intense rain storm events does flood water ever reach the historic floodplain.
The unnamed tributary to Sandy Creek is a viable and feasible restoration project. The unnamed
tributary to Sandy Creek is morphologically unstable and is contributing to water quality
degradation. The current degraded state of the channel, limited floodplain functionality due to
FEB]EcoEngineering
A division of The John R McAdams Company, Inc

Restoration Plan • Duke University Water Reclamation Pond Stream Mitigation
USGS HUC 03030002 • Durham County, North Carolina • October 2012
channel incision, existing and future erosion potential, limited native vegetation along the banks
and riparian area, and amenable landowners make this site a viable and feasible restoration
project. To ensure long term stability of the restoration project, a wide floodplain will be
provided along the majority of the project area to allow for increased flood frequency, associated
with any future development upstream. With increased flow frequency from an increase in
impervious surface, the channel morphology will adjust. Increased flow frequency associated
with future land use changes will be conveyed by the floodplain and any adjustment to channel
dimension will occur as floodplain aggradation instead of channel degradation.
Additional information is located in the Appendices of this report. Report figures are located in
Appendix 1. The restoration design plan sheets are located included in the 24 x 36" Design
Detail Sheets and CD enclosed. Documents related to the project such as agency correspondence
and legal agreements with the property owners are located in Appendix 3. A comparison of the
North Carolina Stream Restoration Institute's Regional Curve versus the project specific regional
curve is presented in Appendix 4. The existing conditions data collected for the unnamed
tributary to Sandy Creek is presented in Appendix 4. Photographs of the project site can be
found in Appendix 5.
2.0 Project Goals and Objectives
The goal of this restoration project is to modify the current dimension, pattern and profile
of an existing stream channel so it will be stable and self - maintaining by utilizing natural
channel design techniques and procedures. The design has been developed utilizing
Rosgen -based natural channel design principles ( Rosgen, 1996). Preventing future
stream bank erosion will be accomplished by fulfilling the following general objectives:
1) Conversion of approximately 3,459 linear feet of the tributary from an eroding, degraded
channel to a natural, stable system with restored aquatic habitat.
2) Reduction of sediment loading to a river system that flows into Jordan Lake - a recreational
water body.
3) Establishment of a riparian corridor that has a restored floodplain, aquatic, and morphological
functions which provide habitat connectivity to the area and will be protected in perpetuity.
The following specific objectives will allow the restoration plan to succeed in obtaining the
project's goal:
1) Design a channel with the appropriate cross - sectional dimension, pattern, and longitudinal
profile utilizing the existing channel condition survey, and collected reference reach data as a
guide.
2) Improve upon and create bedform and aquatic habitat diversity (riffles, runs, pools, and
glides).
3) Create a nested floodplain (bankfull bench) that will be accessible at the proposed bankfull
channel elevation along the entire reach.
4) Ensure channel and stream bank stabilization by integrating in- channel grade control
structures, and native vegetation into the proposed restoration design while also creating a
stable and functional aquatic and terrestrial habitat.
5) Establish a native forested riparian plant community within a minimum of 50 feet from the
proposed top of the bankfull channel along with the removal of exotic vegetation during
FE-I]EcoEngineering
A dwmon of The John R McAdams Company, Inc

Restoration Plan • Duke University Water Reclamation Pond Stream Mitigation
USGS HUC 03030002 - Durham County, North Carolina • October 2012
construction implementation and the elimination of current embankment maintenance
practices.
3.0 Site Description
3.1 Project Location
The proposed project site is located on the main campus of Duke University, in Durham, Durham
County, North Carolina. Specifically, the proposed stream mitigation corridor starts just south of
NC Hwy. 147, runs parallel to Campus Drive, crosses Campus Drive and ties back in to the
receiving waters at Oregon Street (Figure 4). The proposed stream mitigation project is
approximately 1.5 miles from the proposed stream impacts associated with the Duke Univeristy
water reclamation pond.
Duke University owns the entire corridor proposed for mitigation as well as parcels upstream and
downstream from the proposed project.
3.2 Surface Waters
The project site is located within the Cape Fear River Basin, USGS Hydrologic Unit 03030002
(USGS 1974), DWQ subbasin 03 -06 -05 and Local Watershed 14 -digit basin 03030002060110
(NCDENR, 2009). The unnamed tributary flows directly into Sandy Creek (DWQ stream index
number of 16- 41 -1 -11) approximately 2.5 miles downstream of the project terminus. The North
Carolina Division of Water Quality (NC DWQ) has not assigned stream index numbers to the
unnamed tributaries of Sandy Creek located within the project extents.
The current State classification of Sandy Creek and unnamed tributaries is Water Supply V (WS-
V) and C and Nutrient Sensitive Waters (NSW) (NCDENR, 2011). Water Supply V waters are
protected as water supplies which are generally upstream and draining to waters which are
sources of water supply for drinking, culinary, or food processing purposes and are protected for
aquatic life propagation and survival, fishing, wildlife, secondary recreation, and agriculture
(NCDENR, 2011). Nutrient Sensitive Waters require control of pollutants (typically 85% of
total suspended solids) for water quality benefits (NDENR, 2011). Analyzing the United States
Geological Survey (USGS) Northwest and Southwest Durham, North Carolina 7.5 minute
Quadrangle, the unnamed tributary to Sandy Creek within the project extent is a 2nd order stream
based on stream channel characterizations from Leopold's Fluvial Processes in Geomorphology
(Leopold, 1992).
4.0 General Watershed Description
The drainage area of the unnamed tributary proposed for stream restoration is approximately 141
acres at the downstream end Figure 5). Based on our detailed watershed analysis approximately
27 percent (39 acres) of the watershed area is impervious. The subject property is located within
the Piedmont Physiographic Province of North Carolina. A review of the Ecoregions of North
Carolina and South Carolina (Griffith et al., 2002) shows the geology of the subject property is
A]EcoEngineering
A drvaan of The John R NIcAdz= Compmy, Inc.

Restoration Plan • Duke University Water Reclamation Pond Stream Mitigation
USGS HUC 03030002 • Durham County, North Carolina • October 2012
comprised of quaternary to tertiary red sandy loam to silty clay decomposition residuum,
sandstone, conglomerate, mudstone, shale, coal, dikes, and sills within the Triassic Basin. There
are no current agricultural croplands or activities within the watershed, however, there was
stream channelization and relocation associated with the sanitary sewer line installation adjacent
to the unnamed tributary.
The historic development of institutional, commercial and industrial facilities in the drainage
area of the UT to Sandy Creek has aggravated the existing erosion problem by increasing the
runoff to the area. Based on site observations the degraded condition of the streams within the
project area may be the result of historic channelization, periodic dredging, and past vegetation
maintenance practices and to a lesser extent storm water runoff onto the site from the
incremental increase in impervious surface associated with urbanization. Development in the
Sandy Creek watershed threatens to worsen a sediment pollution problem that contributes to
water quality issues in Jordan Lake. However, the proposed stream restoration corridor will tie
into current and future stream restoration projects downstream of the same unnamed tributary,
which will incorporate a more watershed based design approach. There is approximately 11,000
linear feet of stream restoration and enhancement projects sponsored by the Clean Water
Management Trust Fund, in partnership with Duke University, downstream of the currently
proposed stream restoration project.
4.1 Proposed Project and Stormwater Controls
The North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources — Division of Water
Quality (DWQ) has recently issued a nutrient management strategy for the Jordan Lake
watershed, known as the Jordan Lake Rules, designed to restore water quality in the lake by
reducing the amount of pollution entering upstream. The City of Durham, is the local delegated
authority for administering the Jordan Lake Rules for the region in which the Duke water
reclamation pond project is located. Any new development within the Cape Fear River Basin
(Jordan Lake Watershed) shall meet the applicable stormwater management requirements, per
the Durham City Code, Chapter 70, Article X, Sections 70 -736 through 70 -749, effective July 6,
2012.:
Specific requirements that will apply to this development include:
- Removal of 85% of the Total Suspended Solids (TSS) in stormwater runoff from the site.
- Removal of 40% of TN and TP in stormwater runoff on -site OR providing on -site removal of TN
and TP such that export rates of TN do not exceed 6.0 lb/ac/yr for residential development and
10.0 lb/ac/yr for other development, whichever is most restrictive.
- Removal of TN and TP through on -site or off -site measures such that cumulatively the export of
TNfrom the site is equal to or less than 2.2 lb/ac/yr and export of TP from the site is equal to or
less than 0.82 lb/ac/yr.
- Detention such that the post - development flowrates in the 1, 2, and 10 year storm events do not
exceed those computed for the pre- development condition. The City's Stormwater Services
Division is to determine the need for detention based upon this analysis.
Fjj]EcoEngineering
A dmsmn orlbe John a. McAdzs Company, loe.

Restoration Plan • Duke University Water Reclamation Pond Stream Mitigation
USGS HUC 03030002 • Durham County, North Carolina • October 2012
There are currently untreated stormwater conveyances coming off of Campus Drive, and into our
project which will mitigated with project design components described below. And although
there is no impervious surface associated with our overall project there will likely be new
development in the future that will be held to the stormwater management requirements above.
However, to ensure long term stability of the restoration project, a wide floodplain will be
provided along the majority of the project area to allow for increased flood frequency. With
increased flow frequency from an increase in impervious surface, the channel morphology will
adjust. The proper approach to accommodate urbanization in the watershed is to construct the
channel to the current conditions design flow while allowing the entrenchment ratio of the new
channel to be at least 10:1 ratio or greater if possible, instead of the minimum 2.2 to 1 ratio.
Increased flow frequency associated with future land use changes will be conveyed by the
floodplain and any adjustment to channel dimension will occur as floodplain aggradation instead
of channel degradation.
5.0 Existing Stream Conditions
The Unnamed Tributary to Sandy Creek is an incised stream characterized by highly eroded
banks, lack of connection to the floodplain, and lack of bedform complexity. The stream is both
laterally and vertically unstable. The pattern consists of straightened reaches along roads and
sewer lines coupled with highly erosive, tightly meandering reaches. Many of the existing
meanders have too small a meander length and radius of curvature, which could potentially lead
to meanders cutting off and forming oxbows in the future.
The changes in hydrology resulting from a highly urbanized watershed have resulted in a flashy
system that ranges in flows from 0.1 ft3 /s during base flow to over 400 ft3 /s during a recorded
storm event. The power of these flows has led to downcutting in the stream through the original
channel substrate to a layer of Saprolite (weathered bedrock) along several portions of the
stream. In these areas there is no channel bed material create riffle -pool features or support
aquatic life. Several headcuts are located along the reach, the most significant being over a foot
in height located at the sewer crossing in the Central reach of the project.
The downcutting in the system has also led to an incised channel that has no access to a
floodplain during storm events. This has resulted in bank erosion throughout the majority of the
project reach. The eroded banks lack vegetation and root mass necessary for stabilizing the
banks.
A survey of existing conditions led the discovery of brick spoil piles located along the North and
Central sections of the project. Erosion has led to the release of buried brick into the stream,
creating riffles comprised of pulverized brick and native sand/gravel. The brick has also created
weak points in the banks. See Appendix 4 for Existing Conditions Data.
kjEcoEngineering
A& moofThe John RMoak=Cowpony,hr.

Restoration Plan • Duke University Water Reclamation Pond Stream Mitigation
USGS HUC 03030002 • Durham County, North Carolina • October 2012
5.1 Existing Stream Geometry
5. 1.1 Stream Survey Methodology
• one -foot topographic map of existing conditions was provided by Taylor Wiseman & Taylor.
• supplemental survey was then completed with Taylor Wisemen & Taylor in conjunction with
EcoEngineering, a division of the John R. McAdams Company Inc. that comprised of stream
cross - sections, longitudinal profiles, bankfull indicators, and trees greater than eight inches
diameter at breast height (DBH). This supplemental survey was used to evaluate existing
morphological conditions.
5.1.2 Bankf ill Verification
Field reconnaissance of the stream was performed prior to the commencement of the site survey.
The purpose of field reconnaissance was to identify the bankfull elevation from existing
indicators. In some reaches typical bankfull indicators were obscured and sporadic due to active
bank erosion. Where occurring, scour lines, wrack lines, material deposition, and bankfull
benches were used to identify bankfull in the field.
After bankfull elevations were surveyed, existing cross - sections were entered into the hydraulic
model HEC -RAS. Bankfull flowrates estimated from HEC -HMS 1 and 2 year storms and the
North Carolina Piedmont Urban Regional Curve were put into the model. The Regional Curve
flowrate had the closest match to the bankfull indicators found in the field and the existing top -
of -bank (TOB) ranged between the HMS estimates for the 1.5 and 2 year storms.
Table 2 below is a summary of the existing modeled hydrology. The reaches correspond to any
flow change locations on the site as modeled by EcoEngineering in the HEC -HMS model. The
final flowrates chosen for the cross - section design were 67cfs upstream of Campus Drive, and
102cfs downstream of Campus Drive.
Table 2: HEC -RAS modeled exictino hvdrnlnQV anrd hankfnll indiramrc
Reach
DA
(mil)
DA
(Acres)
Field
Est.
Regional
Curve
1- ear
HEC -HMS
2-year 1.5-year
1
1 0 091
58.34
6660
67.85
13498
1 177.86
156.42
2A
1 0.138
88.29
99.00
88.08
163.91
214.53
189.22
P
0.202
129.40
9600
112.07
222.07
293.51
25779
32B
1 0.353
225.69
1 159.10
408.2
503.21
455.705
5.1.3 Stream Classification
Stream channels were classified utilizing the stream classification system devised by Dave
Rosgen ( Rosgen, 1996; Rosgen et al. 1998). This classification system utilizes several
parameters based on field collected data and site observations, which collectively determines the
stream type. The criteria utilized to determine stream type includes the stream slope, width -to-
depth ratio, entrenchment ratio, sinuosity, and substrate class. The section of stream upstream of
Campus Drive is classified as a C4, and the section downstream of Campus drive is classified as
EcoEngineering
A division of The John R McAdams Compm�; loc

Restoration Plan • Duke University Water Reclamation Pond Stream Mitigation
USGS HUC 03030002 • Durham County, North Carolina • October 2012
a B4c. Averaged entrenchment ratios allowed for the C classification, however, many individual
cross - sections had entrenchment ratios approaching the threshold of 1.4 for an F channel.
5.1.4 Channel Classification
Based on the completed channel survey and observations made during the site reconnaissance, it
is evident that the stream has been functionally and hydrologically modified. The southern
section was re- aligned and now follows the sewer line, including 90 degree turns. The riparian
corridor has been encroached upon reducing the protection from stormwater outfalls. The
channel is considered to be incised resulting in the concentration of flood flows within the
confines of the channel that would otherwise be dispersed onto the floodplain. As a result of the
incision, stream power increases beyond sustainable levels causing bed degradation and bank
erosion (Ward and Trimble, 2004; Gordon et al., 1992).
The channel is currently in Stage III of the Channel Evolution Model, which consists primarily of
degradation or erosion of the bed. The channel is currently in transition from a C channel type to an
F channel type. The F channel type consists of a severely incised channel that is completely
separated from its floodplain and an entrenchment ratio less than 1.4.
5.2 Stream Substrate
Bed material in the existing stream is dominated with fine to medium gravel. The D50 ranged
from 4 to a maximum of 9.7 millimeters (mm). Therefore 50% of the bed material sampled
consisted of particles that are classified as medium gravel or finer. A Bar sieve analysis was also
done in order to estimate bedload and incorporate the information in the sediment transport
modeling for the final design. The bar sample had average D50 ranging from 2.1 — 2.9 mm. Table
3 below provides a summary of stream substrate for the unnamed tributary to Sandy Creek.
it Ault o. stream auDstrate I<rom rennie Uounts and Sieve Analysis
Upstream Campus Downstream Campus
Sample Drive Drive
PC d5o (mm) D 50 97 4
PC d84 (mm) 25 27
(largest from subpave) (DI) 26 57
bar /subpave d5o (mm) Dhat
50 2.1 29
5.3 Soils
The subject property is located within the Piedmont Physiographic Province of North Carolina.
A review of the Ecoregions of North Carolina and South Carolina (Griffith et al., 2002) shows
the geology of the subject property is comprised of quaternary to tertiary red sandy loam to silty
clay decomposition residuum, sandstone, conglomerate, mudstone, shale, coal, dikes, and sills
within the Triassic Basin. The Triassic Basin has unusual Piedmont geology of
unmetamorphosed shales, sandstones, mudstone, silstones, and conglomerates. Soils tend to be
FaIlEcoEngineering
A divismo of the John R McAdams Company, hr

Restoration Plan • Duke University Water Reclamation Pond Stream Mitigation
USGS HUC 03030002 • Durham County, North Carolina • October 2012
clayey with low permeability, and streams will typically have low base flows. The clay has a
high shrink -swell potential which could hinder construction.
Figure 2 depicts the Soil Survey of Durham County, North Carolina (Soil Conservation Service,
1977) and Table 3 below lists the soils within 200 feet of UT to Sandy Creek within the project
extents:
Table 3. Soils within 200 feet of Unnamed Tributaa to Sandi Creek
Map Unit Soil Name Percent Slope Comments
Mtll
Mayodan sandy loam
10 to 15
well drained, moderate permeability
WsC
White Store sandy loam
6 to 10
well drained, very slow permeability
WE
Mayodan sandy loam
15 to 25
well drained, moderate permeability
MrD
Mayodan — Urban land
10 to 15
well drained, moderate permeability
complex
Cc Chewacla and Cartecay 0 to 2 somewhat poorly drained, moderate permeability
5.4 Existing Plant Communities
Distribution and composition of plant communities throughout the project site reflect landscape -
level variations in topography, soils, hydrology, as well as past and present land use practices.
Overall, approximately 90 percent of the project site is comprised of forested areas and would
generally be characterized as a Dry Mesic Oak- Hickory Forest according to the North Carolina
Natural Heritage Program (NHP) classification system (Schafale and Weakley, 1990). Tree
species on the property include various oak species (Quercus spp.), American beech (Fagus
grandifolia), tulip poplar (Liriodendron tulipifera), various hickory species (Carya spp.), loblolly
pine (Pinus taeda), red maple (Acer rubrum), and sweet gum (Liquidambar styraciflua).
Groundcover and secondary canopy layer species consist of common greenbriar (Smilax
rotundifolia), giant cane (Arundinaria gigantea), sweet pepperbush (Clethera alnifolia), Virginia
creeper (Parthenocissus quinquefolia), American holly (Ilex opaca), red cedar (Juniperus
virginiana), various viburnum species (Viburnum spp.), Christmas fern (Polystichium
acrostichoides), New York fern (Thelypteris noveboracensis), and netted chain fern
(Woodwardia aerolata).
More specifically, the plant community located along the unnamed tributary to Sandy Creek
would be generally characterized as a Piedmont Bottomland Forest according to the NHP
classification system. Typical species observed within this sub - community include tulip poplar,
sweet gum, various oak species, river birch (Betula nigra), American elm (Ulmus americana),
giant cane, Chinese privet, American holly, poison ivy (Toxicodendron radicans), Virginia
creeper, common greenbriar, Indian wood -oats (Chasmanthium latifolium), Japanese stilt grass
(Microstegium vimineum), and Christmas fern. Although the forested areas surrounding the
unnamed tributary to Sandy Creek would be generally characterized as a Piedmont Bottomland
Forest, these particular forested areas would be considered a very young Piedmont Bottomland
Forest community due to the likely historic agriculture activities resulting in the clearing of the
majority of the forest area. As a result there is an abundance of early succession species such as
loblolly pine, sweet gum, and red maple.
FEMIEcolEngineering
A dWmon of7Le John R McAdam Company, Inc

Restoration Plan - Duke University Water Reclamation Pond Stream Mitigation
USGS HUC 03030002 - Durham County, North Carolina - October 2012
5.5 Threatened and Endangered Species
Some populations of plants and animals are declining because of natural forces or their inability
to coexist with human activity. Plants and animals with Endangered or Threatened status are
protected under the Endangered Species Act (ESA) of 1973 (16 US 1531 et seq.). Table 4 lists
species that, as of November 9, 2011, have Federal protection in Durham County according to
the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS). Federal Species of Concern (FSC) are species not
legally protected under the ESA and are not subject to any of its provisions, including Section 7,
until they are formally proposed or listed as Endangered or Threatened. Table 5 lists FSC
species for Durham County.
Table 4. Federally Protected Species
Scientific Name Common Name Federal Status
Haliaeetus leucocephalus bald eagle BGPA
Rhus michauxii Michaux's sum-'a-c­"
umac _
Echinacea laevigata smooth coneflower E
Notes:
BGPA - Denotes a species declared recovered and is protected under the Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act.
E - Denotes a species in danger of extinction throughout all or a significant portion of its range.
Table 5. Federal Species of Concern
Scientific Name Common Name NC Status
_Anguilla rostrata American eel SC
Etheostoma collis lepidinion Carolina darter_ SC
Noturus uriosus Carolina madtom _ T
_L thrurus matutinus pinewoods shiner SC "�-
Ambloplltes cTv &ns Roanoke bass SR __ _ ­ '.
Fusconaia masoni Atlantic pigtoe E
Lasmigona subviridis green floater _ E
_ SomatgUrus virginicus panhandle pebblesnail SR
Gomphus septima Septima's clubtail SR
Lampsilis cariosa yellow lampmmussel E
Juglans cinerea butternut SC
Monotropsis odorata sweet pinesap SR -V
Del phinium exaltatum tall larkspur E
Notes:
E - Denotes a species whose continued existence as a viable component of the state's flora or fauna is determined to be in
jeopardy.
E -SC- Denotes a species whose continued existence as a viable component of the state's flora or fauna is determined to be in
jeopardy and needs monitoring.
T - Denotes a species which is likely to become an endangered species within the foreseeable future throughout all or a
significant portion of its range.
SIC- Denotes a Special Concern species which requires monitoring but may be taken or collected and sold under regulations
adopted under the provisions of Article 25 of Chapter 113 of the General Statutes (animals) and the Plant Protection
and Conservation Act (plants). Only propagated material may be sold of Special Concern plants that are also listed as
Threatened or Endangered.
SR- Denotes a Significantly Rare species not listed as "E ", "T ", or "SC ", but which exists in the state in small numbers and
has been determined to need monitoring.
SR -V - Denotes a Special Concern Vulnerable which are species that occurred in North Carolina at one time, but for which all
known populations are currently considered to be either historical or extirpated
[JEcoEngineering
A dmisim of lbc John R. McAdam Company, Inc

Restoration Plan • Duke University Water Reclamation Pond Stream Mitigation
USGS HUC 03030002 • Durham County, North Carolina • October 2012
EcoEngineering conducted field surveys by walking transects within the project site. The
objective of the field surveys was to determine the presence of Federally Threatened or
Endangered Species on the property. There were no Federally Threatened or Endangered species
observed during the field surveys. EcoEngineering coordinated with the U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service ( USFWS) and a response from USFWS was reeived on February 19, 2010 explaining
that the proposed action is not likely to adversely affect any federally - listed endangered or
threatened species, their formally designated critical habitat, or species currently proposed for
listing under the Endangered Species Act (Appendix 3).
Prior to conducting field surveys, EcoEngineering reviewed the North Carolina Department of
Environment and Natural Resources - Natural Heritage Program (NHP) database of potentially
rare and protected species and unique habitats within the project site and coordinated with NHP
in a letter dated November 7, 2011. Based on the research, NHP does not have any records of
rare species, significant natural communities, or conservation/managed areas located at the
project site. NHP has ten (10) element occurrences listed within two miles of the project site,
and they are as follows: Rota's feather moss (Brachythecium rotaeanum), variable fork moss
(Dicranella varia), showy aster (Eurybia spectabilis), four -toed salamander (Hemidactylium
scutatum), crested coralroot (Hexalectris spicata — 2 occurrences), wiry panic grass (Panicum
flexile — 2 occurrences), liverwort (Plagiochila ludoviciana), Appalachian golden - banner
(Thermopsis mollis). Based on the field surveys conducted by EcoEngineering, the elemental
occurrences were not observed on the property. In a letter dated January 20, 2010 (Appendix 3),
NHP responded with the following statements: "The Natural Heritage Program has no record of
rare species, significant natural communities, significant natural heritage areas, or conservation
/managed areas at the site or within a mile of the project area."
Coordination with the North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission (WRC) in a letter dated
November 7, 2011. In a letter dated February 12, 2010 (Appendix 3), WRC responded with the
following statements: "There are records no records for threatened and endangered species in
Sandy Creek or its tributaries."
5.6 Cultural Resources
A review of the N.C. State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO) HPOWEB GIS Service database
(http: / /gis.ncdcr.gov/hpoweb/) was conducted. According to their website, HPOWEB "has
current location data for all National Register listings, most Study List entries and
Determinations of Eligibility, and surveyed rural properties for many counties ". Based on the
review, no listings are located within the proposed project area. Correspondence was received
on February 9, 2012 and July 13, 2012 from SHPO explaining that they are aware of no historic
resources which would be affected by the project (Appendix 3).
6.0 Reference Reaches
The driving factor for the design of this restoration project is the flashy hydrology resulting from
a highly urbanized watershed upstream. Data collected for the reference reach was not used as an
exact template for the restored stream but as a vital part of the design process. This channel was
EcoEngineering
Adm moflbe John RMcAdnnCaopmy,1w,

Restoration Plan - Duke University Water Reclamation Pond Stream Mitigation
USGS HUC 03030002 - Durham County, North Carolina - October 2012
chosen because of the similarity to existing stream reaches. Stable features in the existing
channel, as well as existing bankfull geometry were also used in the design process.
6.1 Terrible Creek
Terrible Creek is located approximately 1.3 miles north east of the downtown Fuquay - Varina,
North Carolina within Wake County. More specifically, Terrible Creek crosses Sunset Lake
Road approximately 1.0 mile north of the intersection of Sunset Lake Road and North Main
Street located within Fuquay- Varina. Based on the Fuquay - Varina 7.5- minute topographic
quadrangle Terrible Creek is a 1St order stream and the reference survey was collected at a point
at which the drainage area was calculated to be approximately 2.19 square miles. The
headwaters of the stream originate approximately 0.1 mile east of Broad Street (State Route 55),
which is predominately characterized as commercial and residential. As the creek flows east
towards Sunset Lake Road the watershed becomes forested with the exception of residential
areas located to the north and south which are separated from Terrible Creek by an
approximately 1,200 foot riparian buffer.
Stream data was collected in June of 2009. Information gathered included pattern and
longitudinal profile, cross - sectional area, slope, and pebble count data. Based on the data
collected, Terrible Creek was determined to be a C4 channel type ( Rosgen Stream
Classification). The channel was determined to have a bankfull cross - sectional area of 24.9
square feet, a width of 15.6 feet, and a mean depth of 1.6 feet. The channel is located in a Type
VIII Valley, which is characterized as a wide alluvial valley with a low slope gradient.
In addition to Terrible Creek, typical dimensionless ratios for Rosgen type B channels were used
in sections of the streams where a wide floodplain was unable to be established. In those
instances the entrenchment ratio for a B channel was used.
7.0 Stream Channel Design
7.1 Natural Channel Design
The restoration design for the unnamed tributary to Sandy Creek is based on natural channel
design principles and techniques utilizing reference reach data sets, the existing conditions
survey data collected from the restoration site, and hydrologic and hydraulic modeling of
existing conditions. Additional reference material used to develop the design includes the North
Carolina Urban Piedmont Regional Curve (Harmon et al. 1999; SRI 2000) and Terrible Creek
reference reach data (collected by EcoEngineering in 2009). Design parameters were also
developed based on past professional experience and design constraints at the site.
The proposed stream design will restore the existing incised and degraded channel to a naturally
meandering, ecologically functional C4 type stream channel. With the bed elevation being
constrained by culverts upstream and downstream of each reach (North, South, and Central),
raising the bed to connect to the existing floodplain was not an option. Instead, a nested
floodplain will be established at bankfull elevation creating a terraced landscape. This will allow
energy dissipation during storm events and ecological connectivity.
[jEcoEngineering
A drvisvm orThe John R. McAdams Compmy, hr

Restoration Plan • Duke University Water Reclamation Pond Stream Mitigation
USGS HUC 03030002 • Durham County, North Carolina • October 2012
This restoration is considered to be a Rosgen Priority I and Priority II type of channel restoration.
Sections of the design are designated Priority II type stream restoration since a bankfull bench
(nested floodplain) will be constructed adjacent to the proposed channel alignment and will be
located at a lower elevation relative to the existing floodplain. The existing and proposed
morphological characteristics are depicted in Table 6 on the following pages. Due to an increase
in flow -rate above and below campus drive, the morphology tables have been separated into two
sections.
The restoration design will result in a riffle -pool channel profile that will be reinforced utilizing
in- stream structures such as wood toe, rock -and -rill riffles (a combination of logs and rocks),
boulder clusters, and log vanes. The new channel, floodplain and any disturbed areas within the
conservation easement will subsequently be vegetated with transplants, bare -root seedlings, live
stakes and seeded with temporary and permanent ground cover. Erosion control matting,
temporary /permanent seeding, and live stakes will be applied to the channel embankment
immediately following completion of each channel segment providing surface protection of the
banks.
See Appendix 4 for the Morphological Data Table.
7.2 Dimension
The design bankfull cross - section areas selected for UT Sandy are 14.6 ft north of Campus Drive
and 18.9 ft south of Campus drive. The proposed with is 16 ft upstream and 18 ft downstream.
Average bankfull depth is approximately 1 ft throughout the length of the project. The channel
dimensions were determined utilizing the average measured width of the existing stream, the
North Carolina regional curve, reference reach data, existing site constraints and the required
shear stress to move the D84. The proposed dimensions result in a Rosgen "C" channel type.
7.3 Pattern
The existing pattern is characterized by fairly straight reaches and reaches with tight, unstable
meanders. This results in a sinuosity that is deceptive (1.3- 1.31), as it does not highlight this
inconsistency in pattern. The proposed channel has integrated a meander pattern throughout the
length of the project to the maximum extent possible based on existing site constraints. The
design sinuosity ranges from 1.2 -1.29. The belt width, radius of curvature, and meander length
were established based on stable meanders found in the existing stream along with reference
reach dimensionless ratios.
Incorporating a meander pattern throughout the length of the project will reduce channel shear
stress resulting in less erosion, and provide a stable and diversified 'aquatic habitat. See 24 x 36"
Design Detail Sheets enclosed.
7.4 Bed Form
Bed form along the project stream reach is in poor and unstable condition, primarily due to the
incised and entrenched nature of the channel. Several sections of the existing reach have incised
down to Saprolite (weathered bedrock) resulting in a lack of diversity in bedform. The
[AEcoEngineering
A d'nwon or7he Jahn R McAdam Company, for

Restoration Plan • Duke University Water Reclamation Pond Stream Mitigation
USGS HUC 03030002 • Durham County, North Carolina • October 2012
restoration design incorporates riffles, runs, pools, and glides into the longitudinal profile in
order to reestablish this diversity. Riffles will be located along straight segments of the channel,
runs connect the riffles to the pools which are located along the outside meander bends and
glides connect the pool to the riffle. Riffles are designed to be approximately half the depth of
pools. The surveyed as -built profile may differ slightly because of unforeseen site constraints,
limitations that may be discovered during construction (i.e. bedrock), or slight shifts in the
proposed alignment. These bed features may be reinforced with in- stream structures to insure
bed stability and to maintain bed form. Structures may be omitted or added during construction
due to unknown site conditions or unconsolidated soils. At times, the designer may not install
structures that appear on the design sheets. This action is reserved for instances where the
damage and potential instability caused by installation is greater than the benefit installing a
structure. Structure placement is typically field adjusted to conform to the constructed stream
alignment and profile. Large Design Detail Sheets enclosed within this report contains detailed
plan drawings of the proposed stream's longitudinal profile.
7.5 Riparian Area
A riparian buffer area will be established immediately adjacent to the restored stream channel.
Typical width will be no less than 50 feet on either side of the bankfull elevation of each stream
bank. These areas will be planted with the appropriate native riparian vegetation and will
provide channel stability, flood attenuation and a vegetated buffer that will intercept overland
stormwater. Species will consist primarily of native trees and small shrubs of the Piedmont.
Refer to Section 9.0 Riparian Planting Plan for more details.
7.6 Stormwater
There are several stormwater outlet pipes discharging into the existing riparian buffer along
Campus Drive and Swift Avenue. While enhancement for these outlets is not a regulatory
requirement, it is felt that incorporation of said enhancement will greatly benefit the overall
impact of the project on the ecosystem. Design of enhancement areas will be provided in the
finalized construction documents and may include slowing discharge during storms, allowing for
attenuation of flow in vernal pools, and providing flow access to the floodplain.
7.7 Stream Structures
To provide grade control following construction of the channel, cross -vanes will be used at the
entrance and exit of each culvert. This will concentrate flow into the center of the stream
providing protection to the culvert structure. Rock and roll riffles (a combination of log and rock)
will be used for energy dissipation, flow variation and grade control at certain riffles. Log vanes
will be used on meanders with a small radius of curvature in order to angle flow towards the
center of the channel, lowering the shear stress on outer meanders and reducing erosion potential.
Toe Wood will be used along some pools to provide habitat and bank protection. Rock clusters
will be used in riffles to provide bed stability and flow variation where there is a lack of
appropriate channel material and a high riffle slope.
AEcoEngineedng
A dwn= ofTbr Jobe R MrAdmn Compmy, bir_

Restoration Plan • Duke University Water Reclamation Pond Stream Mitigation
USGS HUC 03030002 - Durham County, North Carolina - October 2012
All wooden structures will use trees taken down during the construction of the proposed channel.
Rock material, if not recovered on site during construction, will be acquired from a local quarry.
7.7.1 Rock - and -Roll Riffle
A Rock - and -Roll riffle (developed by Wildlands Engineering) uses logs imbedded into the
stream that protrude slightly in order to provide grade control and flow variation. The logs
are keyed into the bank and set at different angles along the length of the riffle. Large rocks
are added into the structure to apply additional flow variation and habitat within the riffle.
The purpose of the structure is to create a feature that mimics a natural riffle better than
traditional constructed riffles used in the past.
7.7.2 Toe Wood
The purpose of toe wood is to stabilize streambanks, provide a natural appearance, eliminate
the need for rock toe, and have a cost effective solution with a lower risk. The Toe -wood
incorporates native material harvested during channel construction. Harvested trees are
positioned on the lower third of the bank to ensure it is submerged under water year round to
prevent rot. Cuttings, sod, and live staking are used to cover the toe wood up to the bankfull
stage. The resulting structure provides protection from streambank erosion and habitat for
aquatic life.
7.7.3 Rock Clusters
Rock/boulder clusters are used in riffles to provide habitat, stability and flow variation.
Rocks are sized so as to not be moved by 10 year storm events and are placed sporadically
throughout the riffle. This provides rest areas for fish traveling upstream, habitat for
macroinvertibrates, and increases the channel roughness so that flow is slowed during storm
events.
7.7.4 Loa Vane and Loa Cross -Vanes
The purpose of these log structures is to concentrate streamflow into the thalweg of the
stream and away from streambanks. This reduces shear stress and erosion on the
streambanks.Log vanes are used along the channel meanders, and cross -vanes are used
before and after culverts along the stream.
8.0 Riparian Planting Plan
The proposed riparian planting plan was developed by integrating the native plant species
observed on site, procedures outlined in Guidelines for Riparian Buffer Restoration (NCEEP
2004), along with selected species known to inhabit the Piedmont Bottomland Forest community
type as described in Classification of the Natural Communities of North Carolina (Schafale and
Weakley, 1990) and to institute species diversity. According to this publication, "Very few
bottomlands of any significant size remain. While many bottomlands exist as successional forest
grown up in abandoned fields, intact Bottomland Forests are among the rarest of communities in
North Carolina." Most of the bottomlands that have been cleared or logged in the past are
dominated by loblolly pine, red maple, sweet gum, or sycamore."
The majority of the restored riparian zone will be located within the created bankfull bench and
toe slope areas. This area will be planted with bare root seedlings consisting of bottomland
[JEcoEngineering
A division ofTbe John R McAdams Company, Inc

Restoration Plan • Duke University Water Reclamation Pond Stream Mitigation
USGS HUC 03030002 • Durham County, North Carolina • October 2012
hardwood species as outlined in Schafale and Weakley. Native trees and shrubs that are
currently located within the channel clearing and excavation limits will be removed with as much
of the root ball intact and transplanted adjacent to the restored creek channel or bankfull bench
when possible. The bare root seedlings will be planted during the fall or early spring seasons, as
soon as possible after the completion of the earthwork associated with constructing the new
stream channel. During the following fall, supplemental shrub and tree species will be planted if
survival rates of previously planted seedlings are below target densities as determined in late
summer (August- September). Plant species that will be utilized within the restoration site are
listed in Table 7, presented in this section.
The restored active channel will be planted with the appropriate channel bank species in the form
of live stakes, bare -root seedlings, and transplants consisting primarily of black willow (Salix
nigm), and silky dogwood (Corpus amomum). If quantities from on site sources are not
plentiful, the live stakes will be supplemented by locally identified plant sources (i.e. existing
power line right -of -ways (ROWs), adjacent properties, etc.) or purchased from locally reputable
nurseries. Black willow will not consist of more than 40 percent of the stream bank plantings.
The planting plan will consist of individual tree species as listed in the Table 7, below. Within
riparian buffer areas which are considered maintained/disturbed and cultivated land, the goal is
to plant 436 to 681 trees per acre, with an approximate 8 -foot to 10 -foot spacing. Plant
composition will consist of at a minimum at least six (6) of the tree species. Planting is required
such that a density sufficient to provide an average of 320 trees per acre following five years of
successful monitoring at the Site.
[JEcoEngineering
A dnrision oflbe John R McAdams Company, Inc

Restoration Plan • Duke University Water Reclamation Pond Stream Mitigation
USGS HUC 03030002 • Durham County, North Carolina • October 2012
Table 7. Plant List
Scientific Name
Common Name
Trees
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
green ash
Platanus occidentalis
American sycamore
Quercus a oda
the bark oak
Betula nigra
river birch
Quercus lauri olia
laurel oak
Quercuslyrata
overcup oak
Quercus michauxii
swamp chestnut oak
Quercus phellos
willow oak
Quercus alba
white oak
Quercus falcata
southern red oak
Quercus nigra
water oak
Acer barbatum
southern sugar maple
Ulmus americana
American elm
Fa us grandifolia
American beech
Liriodendron tuli ifera
tulip poplar
Small Trees and Shrubs
Cornus orida
flowering dogwood
Alnus serrulata
tag alder
M rica ceri era
wax myrtle
Car inus caroliniana
ironwood
Magnolia vir iniana
sweet bay
Aronia arbuti olia
red chokeberry
Ilex verticillata
winterberr
Ce halanthus occidentalis
buttonbush
Lindera benzoin
s icebush
Leucothoe racemosa
fetterbush
Aesculus sylvatica
painted buckeye
Asimina triloba
pawpaw
Ilex o aca
American holly
apccics composition may be aajustea based on local availability.
Temporary and permanent seed will be applied simultaneously to the disturbed areas and channel
embankments. Temporary seed will provide cover until the permanent seed becomes
established. Temporary cover will consist of millet (Ecbinocbloa crusgalb), rye grain (Secale
cereale), and crimson clover (Trifolium incarnatum). Permanent ground cover will consist of
switchgrass (Panicum virgatum), deertongue (Panicum clandestinman), black -eyed susan
(Rudbeckia birta), riverbank wildrye (Elymus riparius), and silky dogwood. Silky dogwood will
only be applied along the channel embankments.
9.0 Monitoring Plan
The monitoring plan to evaluate the success of the Site is based the U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers (USACE) Stream Mitigation Guidelines (April, 2003) and the North Carolina
Ecosystem Enhancement Program (NCEEP) Monitoring Requirements and Performance
FEg-]EcoEngineering
A dm m oflbe John R McAdams Cmnpaoy, he

Restoration Plan • Duke University Water Reclamation Pond Stream Mitigation
USGS HUC 03030002 • Durham County, North Carolina • October 2012
Standards for Stream and /or Wetland Mitigation (November, 2011). Monitoring of the Site will
occur annually for seven (7) full years. A monitoring report will be generated by December 31St
of each monitoring year documenting the activities at the Site.
9.1 Stream Monitoring
Stream geometry will be considered successful if the geometry, profile, and sinuosity are stable
or reach a dynamic equilibrium. It is expected that there will be minimal changes in the designed
cross sections, profile, and/or substrate composition. Changes that may occur during the
monitoring period will be evaluated to determine if they represent a movement toward a more
unstable condition (e.g. down cutting, or bank erosion) or are minor changes that represent an
increase in stability (e.g. settling, vegetative changes, coarsening of bed material, etc.).
Deviation from the design ratios will not necessarily denote failure as it is possible to maintain
stability and not stay within the design geometry.
9.1.1 Bankfull Events
The occurrence of bankfull events within the monitoring period will be documented by the use of
a crest gage and photographs. A crest gage will be installed which will record the highest
watermark between site visits. The crest gage will be checked each time there is a site visit to
determine if a bankfull event has occurred. Photographs will be used to document the
occurrences of debris lines and sediment deposition on the floodplain during monitoring site
visits. Monitoring years must cover at least two bankfull events. If by year seven there has only
been one event, monitoring will continue until a second bankfull event occurs.
9.1.2 Longitudinal Profile
A longitudinal profile of the stream will be surveyed after construction of the Site as part of the
As -built surveys. Measurements will include the thalweg, water surface, bankfull, and top of
bank at the head of each feature (e.g., riffle, pool, etc.) and at the maximum pool depth. The
survey will be tied to a permanent benchmark to facilitate comparison of data year to year.
Reference stakes (containing a notation of the stream station) will be installed every 100ft along
the stream length in the riparian buffer. Longitudinal profiles are only required in years 1 -7 if
monitoring efforts indicate significant bank or bed instability.
9.1.3 Cross Sections
A total of ten (10) cross sections will be installed after construction of the Site and will be
surveyed as part of the As -built survey and during Monitoring Years 1, 2, 3, 5, and 7. Each cross
section will be marked on both banks with permanent pins /monuments to establish the exact
transect used. A common benchmark will be used for the cross sections and it will be
consistently used to facilitate easy comparison of year to year data. The cross section survey will
include points measured at all breaks in slope, including top of bank, bankfull, inner berm, edge
of water, and thalweg, if the features are present. There will be five (5) riffle cross sections and
each be classified using the Rosgen Stream Classification System. Pebble counts shall be
completed at each of the riffle cross - sections.
Bank pins will be installed at the five (5) cross - sections located at meander bends. Bank pins
may be rebar, chain, or wire that is driven horizontally in the bank face and must be a minimum
of three (3) ft. long. Bank pins should be installed at an interval of one (1) pin for every two (2)
feet of bank height with the lowest pin above the normal pool line. Bank pins will be installed at
the cross - section (located at the maximum pool location), at the first third of the meander bend,
[JEcoEngineering
A dmsnm of The Jahn R McAdams Company, luc.

Restoration Plan • Duke University Water Reclamation Pond Stream Mitigation
USGS HUC 03030002 • Durham County, North Carolina • October 2012
and last third of the meander bend. Exposed length of pins shall be measured and recorded each
monitoring year to track lateral movement of the stream.
9.1.4 Photograph Stations and Visual Monitoring
Photographs shall be taken at each cross - section with one photograph facing each bank.
Additionally 12 permanent photo stations will be located across the site. Pictures shall be taken
annually at each photostation in the north, south, east, and west directions.
Visual monitoring shall take place along all streams twice annually to document any lateral
movement, structure failure, aggradation/degradation, invasive species, headcuts, or beaver
activity. Visual monitoring will also be required in the buffer to document any excessive
mortality, low stem density, encroachements, or invasive species.
9.2 Vegetation Planting Monitoring
The Site will contain six (6) vegetative monitoring plots (Figure A 11), which will be monitored
in general accordance with the CVS -EEP Protocol for Recording Vegetation (CVS -EEP, v4.2).
Ten (10) by ten (10) meter square plots will be permanently established following completion of
the planting phase and at least two opposing corners will be permanently installed and surveyed
for future use. The plant species, density, survival rates, and the cause of mortality, if
identifiable, will be recorded within each plot. A minimum of 180 days between March 1 and
November 30 must separate initial planting and monitoring of year one. Vegetation plots will be
sampled and reported in years 1, 2, 3, 5, and 7. The primary focus of the vegetative monitoring
will be solely on the tree stratum, although shrub and herbaceous species encountered may also
be recorded.
9.3 Long — Term Preservation Mechanism
The long -term preservation mechanism will be in the form of a Conservation Easement in perpetuity.
The Durham County Soil and Water Conservation District has agreed to hold the Conservation Easement
to provide, third -party, long -term assurance to the success of the project. A Conservation Easement
document agreed to by all parties will be provided once the final mitigation plan is approved.
10.0 Success Criteria
Success criteria will determine if the mitigation project is meeting its prescribed goals as listed in
Section 3.0. A determination will be made regarding the success of the project following the
collection and evaluation of ecological and physical monitoring data, photographs, site
observations, and the performance of the streams during storm events. Monitoring components
that will be evaluated include vegetation survival, channel bed and bank stability, and in- stream
structure performance.
10.1 Stream Success Criteria
Channel stability will be reflected in the surveyed permanent cross - sections, longitudinal profile,
evaluation of bank stability and cover, evaluation of in- stream structure performance and to a
lesser degree pebble counts compared to the as -built and any previously collected monitoring
data. The general trend should reflect a stable or slightly decreasing riffle cross - sectional area
whereas pools may increase and yet be considered relatively stable. The longitudinal profile will
FFfEcoEngineering
A drawn ofTheJahnRMcAdwnCompmy,Inc.

Restoration Plan • Duke University Water Reclamation Pond Stream Mitigation
USGS HUC 03030002 • Durham County, North Carolina • October 2012
typically adjust depending on the frequency of bankfull or greater storm events. Normally the
constructed channel profile will adjust (especially in a sand dominated bed) but it will need to
function without significant degradation (bed scour), aggradation (mid - channel bars), or bank
erosion.
The Bank Height Ratio (BHR) as determined by cross - section surveys, shall not exceed 1.2 and
the Entrenchment Ratio shall be no less than 2.2 within the restored reaches. The stream shall
remain stable over seven years, through two bankfull events, as indicated by visual surveys,
cross - sections, and bank pins. If monitoring (including- vegetation) demonstrates success by year
five (5) a proposal can be issued by the Owner to terminate monitoring of the site.
10.2 Vegetation Planting Success Criteria
Vegetation planting success criteria will be based on the survival of a minimum density of 320
trees per acre (to include both planted and existing trees) after three (3) years of monitoring.
After five (5) years of monitoring, the density shall be no less than 260 trees per acre (to include
both planted and existing trees). After seven (7) years of monitoring, the density shall be no less
than 210 trees per acre (to include both planted and existing trees). In addition, planted
vegetation must average 10 feet in height in each plot at year seven (7). If the height standard is
met and the stem density is trending toward success after five (5) years of monitoring,
monitoring of vegetation on the site may be terminated provided written approval is provided by
the USACE and NCDWQ.
[JEcoEngineedng
A dnmm of The John R. McAdm Compmy, Inc

Restoration Plan • Duke University Water Reclamation Pond Stream Mitigation
USGS HUC 03030002 • Durham County, North Carolina - October 2012
11.0 References
American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE). 1975. Sedimentation Engineering, Manuals and
Reports on Engineering Practice No. 54, Vito A. Vanoni, ed., New York.
Andrews, E.D. 1983. Entrainment Of Gravel From Naturally Sorted Riverbed Material.
Geological Society of America Bulletin 94, pp. 1225 -1231.
Gordon, N.D., T.A. McMahon, and B.L. Finlayson. 1992. Stream Hydrology. John Wiley &
Sons Ltd. West Sussex, England.
Griffith, G. and Omernik, J., 2002. Draft Level III and IV Ecoregions of North Carolina.
USAEPA, USDA -NRCS, and NCDENR.
Harmon, W.A., G.D. Jennings, J.M. Patterson, D.R. Clinton, L.O. Slate, A.G. Jessup, J.R.
Everhart, R.E. Smith. 1999. Bankf ill Hydraulic Geometry Relationships for North
Carolina Streams.
http: / /www5.bae.ncsu.edu/ programs / extension /wqg/sri /rural _pied _paper.html
Hupp, C.R. and A. Simon. 1986. Vegetation and bank -slope development. Proceedings of the
Fourth Federal Interagency Sedimentation Conference 4:83 -92.
Leopold, L.B., M.G. Wolman, and J.P. Miller. 1992. Fluvial Processes in Geomorphology.
Dover Publications, Inc. New York, NY.
Leopold, L.B., 1994. A View of the River. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
NC Department of Environment and Natural Resources. November 2011. Surface Water
Classifications. http: / /portal.ncdenr.or /web /wq/ps /csu/classifications
NC Department of Environment and Natural Resources. July 2007. Stormwater Best
Management Practice Manual.
NC Department of Environment and Natural Resources Ecosystem Enhancement Program.
October 2004. Guidelines for Riparian Buffer Restoration.
NC Department of Environment and Natural Resources. 2011 -2012. Jordan Lake Water Nutrient
Management Strategy
Rosgen, D.L. 1996. Applied River Morphology. Wildland Hydrology Books, Pagosa Springs,
Colorado.
Rosgen, D.L. and Silvey, Lee. 1998. Field Guide for Stream Classification. Wildland
Hydrology.
PlEcoEngineering
A &view of The John R Mum Compmy. 1w

Restoration Plan • Duke University Water Reclamation Pond Stream Mitigation
USGS HUC 03030002 • Durham County, North Carolina • October 2012
Rosgen, D.L. 2001. The Cross -Vane, W -Weir, and J -Hook Vane Structures... Their
Description, Design and Applications for Stream Stabilization and River Restoration.
2001 ASCE Conference Proceedings. Reno, NV.
Schafale, Michael P. and Weakley, Alan S. 1990. Classification of the Natural Communities of
North Carolina Third Approximation. NC Department of Environment, Health, and
Natural Resources.
Soil Conservation Service (SCS), 1977. Soil Survey of Durham County, North Carolina.
USDA.
Stream Restoration Institute (SRI). 2000. NC Rural Piedmont Regional Curve.
http: / /www.bae.ncsu. edu/ programs / extension /wqg /sri /rural _pied_regcurves.html
United States Geological Survey. 1974. North Carolina Hydrologic Unit Map.
USDA Chapter 11, Rosgen Geomorphic Channel Design, Part 654 Stream Restoration Design
Issued August 2007.
Ward, Andy D., Stanley W. Trimble. 2004. Environmental Hydrology, Second Edition. Lewis
Publishers.
Wildland Hydrology. 1998. The Reference Reach Field Book. Wildland Hydrology.
[jEcoEngineering
A dirnaon orThe John R McAdams Company, Inc

aen; -
•
qg
N� yi��• Ste,
NO' '
F
J�
•�•,3 :• �R£iN' � �' if 'Jtf.,.
1, bstation 22 wa
qw
r '
,• tl ,
3yy .t�
f.
%.: t�. -..try I. : • K ■ ' ,
YEA ld
• - yr l.- z
14, 1 444
.STREAM
'
RESTORATION CORRIDOR y♦��,� �\ `r�i y1 1
j
. 1 4
1,4 ve
lin
E WO
r•
U565 QUADRANGLE NORTHWE5T AND 5OUfHkE5T DURHAM, NG; Ig72 FHOTOREV15EV ma-7;
36.003118 ■N, - 18.c14cicf23•W
FIGURE 1. NORTHWE r & SOUTIEWWr DURHAM, NC USGS QUADS �
rxor�cr no. DKU -08010 ■
Fn�`a DKU0 —080 0 DUKE WATER EcoEngineering
® A &Owim of T4■ lcm A m@A
REC 'ION POND m'.
5 1 " = 1, 000' ">Zxs • "' • 'xraram • oeL CH S�1ZEAM PES'PORATION CORRIDOR M6IZ RM -
n nen: 12 -14 -11 = *ROM r., M, a�,m as ?7713
DURHAM, NORTH CAROIDLA W734 -Mg. gym •

s
Ai
i
Ur
BUS
W c MrC�
Wwc
Ur
sE MrD
STREAM RESTORATION CORRIDOR
Ur WSE
Gu wss r
aler ,F -' Ws8
MfM
VbsB
WsC /'N,C �
1
Mfr c�
Mf8 Mf
W wC:
Mfb
Wss
i
W,
WwE /
SC
WwC
U50A -5G5 501L 5UR1/EY OF DURHAM COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA; 5HEET 21; Ic10
F1 2. F
PxoraCT no. DKU DUKE WATER AEcoEngineering
DKU0801X.DW 1X.DWG
1ENUOU'dClAMATION POND A���'�RMoAd ®Stns.
1" = 1,000' STREAM RESMRAMON CORRIDOR
t mss t� . clista�arra
DURH M, NORTH CAROLM MT�� '*"' �,V� ft.: s -M

r� . 4* ,�'. ,' -, �► -.-'- -, ft ; ,�. � �. "� oU %,/ SMITH WAREHOUSE
-
L
_ MAINjGARDENS f� �F T t
� E
0
;<
POND -
+ ti
N '
:
i>
PROPOSED CAMPUS DRIVE
Al
T
WATER REAM MITIGATION /
,Y
REUSE POND # 1 y - ► PROPOSED-
PROPOSED a c,
1
_ Y
r> k FISH POND 4 w #r;
:� CAMPUS DRIVE -�
SOUTH LAWN
t tf
F
POND �. �• u ® �� � �-- � - _ - � �.
j
Mf
�., PLIS DELTA SMART HOU R
— — r_� f
B I O R ET E N T I O N
,
ARE
. BM
F 4 # C TO BE RESTORED h
WITH REALIGNMEN
_.
OF CAMPUS DRIVET
°r
` i
cl
3 S
-
s Ss
- P
g
c
_
z-
_' s
j.
PROPOSED SWAMP PHASE V
WETLAND, DESIGNED AND , SWAMP V.
CONSTRUCTION FUNDING
,
APPROVED
%
SWAMP III - - r..:.,
SWAMP STREAM `
WETLAND.'
SWAMP STREAM _
,i F CURE E R S I T Y
t
. #3 OSED
RESTORATION
s`f
(EXISTING AND FUTURE). ( 3 . PROP
WATER RECLAMATION AND :, STREAM MITIGATION EXHIBIT
R � SWAMP I y
SWAMP II —�� � �� $+ `.x :�' '; ' � — �' ¢ � PROPOSED STREAM RESTORATION (POND)
PROPOSED STREAM RESTORATION:
DESIGNED, WAITING ON CONSTRUCTION
e
3` 4 j" { }' FUNDING (DR. RICHARDSON)
ke
wl
SWAMP WETLANDx t- .A may: = %,
FU
" x W ^ .i EXISTING STREAM RESTORATION
IMPOUNDMENT
�' ..
(DR. RICHARDSON)
IA
, All PROPOSED STREAM RESTORATION:
s
• € ° DESIGNED, CITY PROPERTY
* t'a < �t ' (DR. RICHARDSON)
r
t yye
,
x
i k
R „ .t 4 PROPOSED DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS/
SWAN P 1 V g'` MODIFICATIONS ALONG OREGON ST. JANUARY. 2oi2
SWAMP IV B 2 4
�\ y
t a - [4EcoEngineering ' ,3" RTH
� Inc. A division of The John R. WAdarnn Cornpany, tr,

x_
UPPER GARDENS
POND - ,
,r
I ' J
., f
jt.
col
R:
.z
M
MAIN GARDENS
' A ,
1
POND ,.
' tr
< - O a°8
a
:
P.
= o '
SMITH WAREHOUSE
PROPOSED CAMPUS DRIVE
— , k WETLAND BMP"
STREAM MITIGATION
_
3. R 4v. {
rk
w .. f �� ,.,
#,
's
PROPOSED
-CAMPUS DRIVE
t
a
ALIGNMENT
IvL:._
�O
s1m k DELTA SMART HOUSE--//
BIORETENTION
CAMPUS AREA BMP
4 TO
S DIVE
n
TO BE RESTORED
` WITH REALIGNMENT -- �
r
*- OF CAMPUS DRIVE `' ,
PROPOSED CAMPUS DRIVE
a DIKE Un IV R
u EP STREAM MITIGATION
` Y
SITy F,OAD+
FIGURE 3 : INSET I
a
PROPOSED STREAM RESTORATION (POND)
PROPOSED STREAM RESTORATION:
3 5-
Y
S T r CONSTRUCTION
DES!GNEC, WAI. IN.. ON CONS
b_, FUNDING (DR. RICHARDSON)
xyy ;
x EXISTING STREAM RESTORATION
' s T
- (DR. RICHARDSON)
}k x. r , D
PROPOSE EDDC IT PROPERTORATION.
. �.
(DR. RICHARDSON)
ke
3
PROPOSED DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS/
4
JANUARY. ODIFICATIONS ALONG OREGON ST
�
y _
L � t
C 7t
640
i [4EcoEngineering
- l og.. a }' d- A division of'The John R. NlcAc4�nin Company, Inc, NOS

a
A
O
z
A
CA
F"
d
O
x
0
z
naoaect nn. DKU - 0801 0
CAMPUS DRIVE STREAM MITIGATION PLAN
EcoEngineerind
ettenee�t: WEST NIT. EXHIBITS
FIGURE 4: CONCEPTUAL CAMPUS DRIVE MITIGATION PLAN
P
SCALE: 1 N =,200'
can
ne�re:
06 -19 -2012
DURHAM, NORTH CAROLINA
M" P b" W War„"

irk
R.2 P a
WA
Fr
i
1
!!.n!1�" .��� F :�1• � �' .rift r
77
—
F��
r
i
.a_
PR°ACT Y0
DKU -08010 t�Tri Ax�: EXHIBITS
scats: NTS
DAT
10 -26 -2012
CAIVIP`US DRIVE NMGATION PIAN
FIGURE 5: DRAINAGE AREA
DUMAM, NORTH CAROLINA
AEcoEngineedng A �,,��,, , hr.
�►�.��
TXMWZ ,
eistW*,e. wwwjghwmcmbmcm ,Ucumft: CAM

North Carolina Department of Cultural Resources
,'State Historic Preservation Office
Ramona M Bartos, Administrator
Beverly Eaves Perdue, Governor
Linda A Carlisle, Secretary
Jeffrey J Crow, Deputy Secretary
July 13, 2012
Eric Alsmeyer
Raleigh Regulatory Field Office
3331 Heritage Trade Drive
Suite 105
Wake Forest, NC 27587
Office of Archives and History
Division of Historical Resources
David Brook, Director
Re: Stream Impacts for the Construction of the Duke University Water Reclamation Pond,
Duke University, West Campus, SAW 2012 - 01043, Durham County, ER 11 -2184
Dear Mt. Alsmeyer:
We have received a public notice from the US Army Corps of Engineers concerning the above project.
We have conducted a review of the project and are aware of no historic resources which would be affected by
the project. Therefore, we have no comment on the project as proposed.
The above comments are made pursuant to Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act and the
Advisory Council on Historic Preservation's Regulations for Compliance with Section 106 codified at 36 CFR
Part 800.
Thank you for your cooperation and consideration. If you have questions concerning the above comment,
please contact Renee Gledhill- Earley, environmental review coordinator, at 919- 807 -6579. In all future
communication concerning this project, please cite the above - referenced tracking number.
Sincerely,
60311Ramona M. Bartos
Location 109 East]ones Street, Raleigh NC 27601 Mailing Address. 4617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh NC 27699 -4617 Telephone /Fax- (919) 807 - 6570/807 -6599

North Carolina Department of Cultural Resources
State Historic Preservation Office
Peter 13. Sandbeck, ldmtnistrttor
Beverly 1:at•es 11cidue, Governor Office of Acehivez and I listory
I Midi A Carlisle, Secrelaty Dtvtason of 1 listoncal Re,outce%
Jeffrey) Clow, Deputy Secrctaty baud Brook, Uncctor
February 9, 2010
George Buchholz
Lcol:?ngineer>ng
Pty Boy( 11005
Research Triangle Park, NC 27709
Re: Duke Universiq Storrnwater Harvesting facility and Mitigation Design, Durham, DKU- 08010,
Durham County, ER 10 -0133
Dear Mr. Buchholz:
Thank you for your letter of January 15, 2010, concerning the above project.
We have conducted a review of the project and arc aware of no historic resources which would be affected by
the project. Therefore, we have no comment on the project as proposed.
The above comments are made pursuant to Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act and the
Advisory Council on Historic Preservation's Regulations for Compliance with Section 106 codified at 36 CFR
Part 800.
Thank you for your cooperation and consideration. If you have questions concerning the above comment,
please contact Renee Gledhill - Farley, environmental review coordinator, at 919 -807 -6579. In all future
communication concerning this project, please cite the above - referenced tracking number.
Sincerely,
LaL && Lo -&At
Teter Sandbeck
Location- 109 Vast Jonc.. Street, Raleigh N(: 27001 Mailing Address-4617 Afad ScnicY (aver, Raleigh N(.27699-4617 Telephone/Fax- ()19) 807 -6570 /807 -0599

United States Department of the Interior
George Buchholz
EcoEngincering
2905 Meridian Parkway
Durham, NC 27713
FISH ANi) WILDLIFE' SLIMC1=.
Raleigh field Office
Post (Mice Box 33726
Ralei-h. North Carolina 27636 -3726
February 16, 2010
Re- Duke University Stormwater Harvesting facility and Mitl�ation Desien DKI J- 08010
Dear Mr. Buchholz:
This letter is to iilfOr•nl you that a list of all federally- protected endangered and threatened species
with known occurrences In North Carolina is now available on the U.S. Dish and Wildlife
Service's (Service) web page at ilttp: / /www.fws.gov /raleigh. Therefore, if you have projects that
occur within the Raleigh Field Office's area of responsibility (see attached county list), you no
longer need to contact the Raleigh Field Office for a list of federally- protected species.
Our web page contains a complete and fi•equently updated list of all endangered and threatened
species protected by the provisions of the Endangered Species Act of 1973, as amended (16
U.S.( . 1531 ct seq.)(Act), and a list of federal species of concern' that are known to occur" in
each county in North Carolina.
Section 7 of the Act requires that all federal agencies (or their designated notl4ederal
representative), in consultation with the Service, insure that any action federally authorized,
funded, or carried out by such agencies is not likely to jeopardize the continued existence of any
federally - listed endangered or threatened species. A biological assessment or evaluation play be
prepared to fulfill that requirement and in determining whether additional consultation with the
Service is necessary. In addition to the federally- protected species list, Information on the
species' life histories and habitats and information on completing a biological assessment or
evaluation and can be found ail our web page at Ilttp: / /www.fws.gov /raleigh. Please check the
web site often for updated information or changes.
' The term " fedei al species of concern" refers to those species which (lie Service believes might be iii need of
concenoated conscivatson actions. Federal species of concern ieceive no legal protection and their designation does
not necessarily imply that the species will eventually be proposed for listing as a federally endangered or threatened
species. However, we recommend that all practicable measures be taken to avoid or minimize adverse impacts to
federal species of concern.

If your project contains suitable habitat for any of the federally- listed species known to be
present within the county where your project occurs, the proposed action has the potential to
adversely affect those species. As such, we recommend that surveys be conducted to determine
the species' presence or absence within the project area. The use of North Carolina Natural
Heritage program data should not be substituted for actual field surveys.
If you determine that the proposed action may affect (i.e., likely to adversely affect or not likely
to adversely affect) a federally - protected species, you should notify this office with your
deternnrnation, the results of your surveys, survey methodologies, and an analysis of the effects
of the action on listed species, including consideration of direct, indirect, and cumulative effects,
before conducting any activities that might affect the species. If you determine that the proposed
action will have no effect (i.e., no beneficial or adverse, direct or indirect effect) on federally
listed species, then you arc not required to contact our office for concurrence (unless an
Environmental Impact Statement is prepared). HOWevcr, you should maintain a complete record
of the assessment, including steps leading to your determination of effect, the qualified personnel
conducting the assessment, habitat conditions, site photographs, and any other related articles.
With regard to the above - referenced project, we offer the following remarks. Our comments arc
Submitted pursuant to, and in accordance with, provisions of the Endangered Species Act.
Based on the information provided and other information available, it appears that the proposed
action is not likely to adversely affect any federally - listed endangered or threatened species, their
formally designated critical habitat, or species currently proposed for listing under the Act at
these sites. We believe that the requirements of section 7(a)(2) of the Act have been satisfied for
your project. Please remember that obligations under section 7 consultation must be
reconsidered if: (1) new information reveals impacts of this identified action that may affect
listed species or critical habitat in a manner not previously considered; (2) this action is
subsequently modified in a manner that was not considered in this review; or, (3) a new species
is listed or critical habitat determined that may be affected by the identified action.
However, the Service is concerned about the potential impacts the proposed action might have
on aquatic species. Aquatic resources are highly susceptible to sedimentation. Therefore, we
recommend that all practicable measures be taken to avoid adverse impacts to aquatic species,
including implementing directional boring methods and stringent sedinnent and erosion control
measures. An erosion and sedimentation control plan should be submitted to and approved by
the North Carolina Division of Land Resources, Land Quality Section prior to construction.
Erosion and sedimentation controls should be installed and maintained between the construction
site and any nearby down - gradient surface waters. In addition, we recommend maintaining
natural, vegetated buffers on all streams and creeks adjacent to the project site.
The North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission has developed a Guidance Memorandum (a
copy can be found on our website at (littp: / /www.fAs.gov /raleigh) to address and mitigate
secondary and cumulative impacts to aquatic and terrestrial wildlife resources and water quality.
We recommend that you consider this document in the development of your projects and in
completing an initiation package for consultation (if necessary).
2

We hope you find our web page useful and inibrmative and that following the process described
above will reduce the time required, and eliminate the need, for general correspondence for
species' lists. If you have any questions or comments, please contact Mark Bowers of this office
at (919) 856 -4520 ext. 19.
Sincerely,
A4--- Pcte Benjamin
Field Supervisor
3

List of Counties in the Service's Raleigh Field Orrice Area of Responsibility
Alamance
Beaufort
Bertie
Bladen
Brunswick
Camden
Carteret
Caswell
Chatham
Chowan
Columbus
Craven
Cumberland
Currituck
Dare
Duplin
Durham
Edgecombe
Franklin
Gates
Granville
Greene
Guilford
Halifax
Harnett
I lertford
Hoke
Hyde
Johnston
Jones
Lee
Lenoir
Martin
Montgomery
Moore
Nash
New Hanover
Northampton
Onslow
Orange
Pamlico
Pasquotank
Pender
0
Perqulmans
Person
Pitt
Randolph
Richmond
Robeson
Rockingham
Sampson
Scotland
Tyrrell
Vance
Wake
Warren
Washington
Wayne
Wilson

ir&ENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Beverly Eaves Perdue
Governor
January 20, 2010
Mr. George Buchholz
EcoEnginecring
P.O. Box 14005
Research Triangle Park, NC 27709
Dee Freeman
Secretary
DI0)d�ty
Subject: Duke University -- Stormwater Harvesting Facility and Mitigation Design; Durham, Durham
County
Project DKiJ -0$010
Dear Mr. Buchholz:
'The Natural Heritage Program has no record of rare species, significant natural communities, significant
natural heritage areas, or conservation /managed areas at the site nor within 0.25 -mile of the project area.
Our maps show vague locations between 0.25 -mile and a mile of two plant species that have not been
seen since 1955. Considering; the amount ofdevclopmcnt in the area, and the 55 years or more that has
elapsed, we assume that such species are no longer present within a mile of the project.
You may wish to check the Natural Heritage Program database website at www.iiciihl).org fora listing of
rare plants and animals and significant natural communities in the county and on the quad map. Our
Program also has a new website that allows users to obtain information on element occurrences and
significant natural heritage areas within two miles of a given location:
< http : / /iilipwcb.ei)i•.state.iic.tis /phis /public /giiiap75_maii).pl)tii3l >. The user name is "public" and the
password is "heritage ". You may want to click "Help" for more information.
NC OneMap now provides digital Natural Heritage data online for free, 'This service provides site
specific information on GIS layers with Natural Ileritagc Program rare species occurrences and
Significant Natural Heritage Areas. "The NC OneMap website provides Element Occurrence (EO) 1D
numbers (instead of species name), and the data user is then encouraged to contact the Natural Heritage
Program for detailed information. ']'his service allows the user to quickly and efficiently get site specific
NHP data without visiting the NHP workroom or waiting f'or the Information Request to be answered by
NHP staff. For more information about data formats and access, visit <www,nconcmap.com >, then click
on "FTP Data Download ", and then "nheo.zip" [to the right of "Natural Heritage Element Occurrences "]
You may also e -mail NC OneMap at <dataa (a),ncmaiLnel> for more information.
Please do not hesitate to contact me at 919- 715 -8697 if you have questions or need further information.
Sincerely, JJ
Harry E. LeGrand, Jr., Zoologist
Natural Heritage Program
1601 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699 -1601
Phone, 919- 733.49841 FAX. [phone] Internet. www.enr state nc us
An Equal oppodumly 1 Affirmative Action Employer - 59% Recycled 1'tU% Post Consumer Paper
One
NorthCarohna
I/ WIM7101

, North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission
Gordon Myers, Executive Director
12 February 2010
Mr. George Buchholz
EcoEngincering
P.O. Box 14005
Research Triangle Park, NC 27709
Subject: Duke University Stormwater Harvesting Facility and Mitigation Design, Durham, North
Carolina. DKI3- 08010.
Dear Mr, Buchholz:
Biologists with the North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission (NCWRC) have reviewed the
subject information and we are familiar with the habitat values of the area. Our comments are provided in
accordance with provisions of the Dish and Wildlife Coordination Act (48 Stat. 401, as amended; 16
U.S.C. 661 -667d) and North Carolina General Statutes (G.S. 113 -131 et seq.).
Duke University proposes to construct a water harvesting system that includes two stormwater
capture basins. The purpose of the project is to harvest stormwater runoff to replace potable City water
for process and irrigation water on the campus. The project also includes stream restoration as on -site
mitigation for construction of the stormwater capture basins.
The proposed stormwater capture basins appear to be impoundments of unnamed tributaries to
Sandy Creek in the Cape fear River basin. There are no records for threatened or endangered species in
Sandy Creek or its tributaries. Although we do not have any records for listed species on or near the
proposed project site, an on -site survey is the only definitive means to determine whether the proposed
project would directly impact threatened or endangered species, We suggest you consult with the U.S.
Fish and Wildlife Service at (919) 856 -4520 to ensure that any issues related to federally listed species are
addressed.
We recognize your request for information is specifically related to the presence of threatened or
endangered species; however, it appears the proposed project may impound stream channels. The
NCWRC hesitates to concur with the construction of instream dams because these can modify stream
flows, affect water quality, and can alter the natural diurnal, seasonal, and annual patterns of the upstream
and downstream movements of instream biota (Yeager 1993). NCWRC recommends that small
impoundments be located off - channel and wetlands be avoided. Any environmental documents or
permits related to this project should discuss the reason(s) off - channel impoundments are not feasible.
The following are NCWRC's general comments and recommendations regarding construction of
impoundments and are provided as information for the applicant
Mailing Address: Division of Inland Fisheries - 1721 Mail Service Center - Raleigh, NC 27699 -1721
Telephone: [phone] a Fax: [phone]
9i3o1 '6f'�' 9 C C 4ueSA
Q Tje 4S e9i :60 OI ZI qeJ

Page 2
12 February 2010
Duke University Stormwater Basins
DKU -08010
I . The applicant should contact the N.C. Division of Land Quality to determine if a dam safety
review is required.
2. The applicant should contact the N.C. Division of Water Resources (DWR) regarding a minimum
flow release.
3. The outflow pipe must be designed to draw water from near the bottom of the pond. Coldwater
bottom withdrawal devices should be within 1 -2 feet of the bottom, but not on the bottom. This
design will prevent buildup of poorly oxygenated water and improve water quality in the pond.
The discharge should be aerated to enhance dissolved oxygen levels.
4. Discharge from the impoundment should be routinely monitored to ensure compliance with the
required minimum flow release. In addition, outflow water temperatures and dissolved oxygen
should be monitored. Outflow water temperatures should be compared to inflow water
temperatures and should not exceed the temperature standard for piedmont streams.
5. Only native piedmont species should be stocked in the impoundment. A stocking permit from the
NCWRC is now required to stock any species of fish, mollusks or crustaceans in the public,
inland fishing waters of North Carolina. Applications for a stocking permit are available at
hLA?-/ /v . There is no fee associated with the permit application process.
G. Native woody vegetation (e.g., river birch, sycamore, bald cypress, water oak, willow oak,
overcup oak, swamp white oak, swamp chestnut oak) should be re- established wherever possible
around the impoundment, but not on the dam. We recommend a 50 -foot forested buffer on
intermittent streams and a 100 -foot forested buffer on perennial streams. These areas should be
protected with conservation easements.
7. Residual flow in the stream below the dam must be maintained during filling of the impoundment
to protect aquatic life. However, turbid water should not be discharged. Until water in the
impoundment is clear, flexible pipe should be used to maintain any stream flow around the
impoundment.
S. Concrete is toxic to aquatic life and should not be allowed to come in contact with surface waters
until cured.
9. All mechanized equipment operated near surface waters should be inspected and maintained
regularly to prevent contamination of stream waters from fuels, lubricants, hydraulic fluids or
other toxic materials.
10. Rock, sand, or other materials should not be excavated from the stream channel except in the
immediate permitted area. Also, sandbags, flexible pipe, or other stable diversion structures
should be used to avoid excavation in flowing water.
H. A plan should be developed to manage sediment behind the dam. Potential examples include
periodical flushes (thorough sediment analysis and prior assessment of the foreseeable effects of
releasing sediment must be included) and sediment removal (passive techniques are preferred
such as sediment trapping devices).
12. Sediment and erosion controls measures should be installed prior to any land clearing or
construction. These measures should be routinely inspected and properly maintained. Excessive
silt and sediment loads can have numerous detrimental effects on aquatic resources including
destruction of spawning habitat, suffocation of eggs, and clogging of gills of aquatic species.
E ' d SZ9L ' 6tb ' 9EE queF,.ig t je4S eg T :60 01 a T qoj

Page 3
12 February 2010
Duke University Stormwater Basins
DKU -08010
Thank you for the opportunity to comment on this project. If we can provide further assistance,
please contact our office at (336) 449 -7625.
Literature cited
Yeager, B. L. 1993. Dams. Pages 57-114. In C_ F. Bryan and D. A. Rutherford, editors. Impacts on
wormwater streams: Guidelines for evaluation. Southern Division, American Fisheries Society, Little
Rock, Arkansas.
Sincerely,
,-<s "—A 1�6�
Shari L. Bryant
Piedmont Region. Coordinator
Habitat Conservation Program
-�''°1 229L'6-1�119 19CE 4ueRJg tje4s e9T :GO OT ZT qOJ

Digital File Name Morpt _Table As
Input Data in White Calls (print Copy only)
Parameter
Drainage Area (m12)
Stream Type (Rosgen)
Bankfull X -Sec Area, Abia (ft`)
Bankfull Width, Wme (ft)
Bankfull Mean Depth, Dba (ft)
Width to Depth Ratio, Wbia/Dbu
Width of Flood -Prone Area, Wipa (ft)
Entrenchment Ratio, Wipa/Wbie
Bankfull Velocity, VbM (ft/sec)
Bankfull Discharge,QbM (ft'
/sec)
Max Depth at Bankfull, Dma. (ft)
Max Depth Ratio, Dma4Dme
Bank Height, Drab (ft)
Bank Height Ratio (BHR), Dtw/Dmm
Meander Length, Lm (ft)
Meander Length Ratio, L^bxr
Radius of Curvature, Rp (ft)
Radius of Curvature Ratio, RdWbM
Belt Width, W, (ft)
Meander Width Ratio, Wba/WbM
Valley Length, L., (ft)
Channel Length, L. (ft)
Sinuosity, K
Valley Slope, svia (ft/ft)
Channel Slope, Sa„ (ft/ft)
Rr fle Length, Lnr (ft)
Riffle Length Ratio, LnMW
Riffle Slope, Sar (ft/ft)
Riffle Slope Ratio, S„r /Sm
Glide Slope, Sai,,e (ft/fl)
Pool Max Depth, Dpod (ft)
Pool Max Depth Ratio, Dp./DbM
Pool Area, Apaa, (ft`)
Pool Area Ratio, Apaa�/Abu
Pool Width, Wpbai (ft)
Pool Width Ratio, WpwMbu
Pool Length, Lp. (ft)
Pool Length Ratio, Lpoo✓Wbd
Pool -Pool Spacing, p -p (ft)
Pool -Pool Spacing Ratio, p -p/WbM
PC d. (mm) D 50
PC du (mm)
(largest from subpave) (Di)
Dar /subpave dm (mm) Dhat 50
Stream Name UT Sandy Creek, Duke Campus
TERRIBLE CREEK
1 / 1A 2/1B 3 / 3A
EXISTING CONDITIONS
Upstream Campus Dr
EXISTING CONDITIONS
Downstream Campus Drive
DESIGN STREAM
Upstream Campus Drive
DESIGN STREAM
Downstream Campus Drive
Min Max Median
Min Max Median
Min Max Median
Min Max Median
Min Max Median
00912
00912
00912
0 128
035
02022
00912
00912
00912
0 128
035
02022
C4 i C4 C4
C4
C4
C4
B4c
B4c
B4c
C4
C4
253 ! 249 275
103
161
155
143
217
178
145
165
155
17
20
18
201 156 192
76
138
9
95
129
112
147
17.2
157
1 f60
too
t7.0
12
1.6 14
12
2 t
16
14
1,8
1.5
ID
1.0
10
1.1
1.1
1.1 =
160
98 134
63
66
56
68
7.2
75
150
180
160
150
180
160
200
200 I 200
178
51 3
1 216
155
238
218
60
60
60
60
60
60
100
52.8
104
23
37
24
1,6
18
19 _
41
35
38
20
32
25
46
5.3
51
58
47 -
4.3
61
4.9
37
46
41
43
51
52
51
1165 b 1314 1404
602
762
666
88
106
67
67
67
67
102
102
102
19 18 18
21
27
22
21
24
23
13
1.7
1,5
114
1.9
16
1 5 I 1,t 13
18
t 3
14
1,5
13
1.5
13
1 8
1 5
13
1 8
1 5
19 18 r 18
28
61
37
29
6
41
13
.1,7
15
1.4
19
16
10 10 10
13
23
t7
14
25
1,8
1
1
1
1
1
1
52 125 , j 102
424
151
67
54
151
893
369
1206
86,6
479
142,3
-433
26 80 53
15.t
24,8
t8t
186
252
2L8
25
7
55
3
75
55
13 1 48 15
96
27
133
72
51
207
133
431
'157
t44
474
17.0
06 31 0.8
02
0,2
02
01
03
02
09
25
1
09
25
1
27 40 36
186
578
3425
21
947
432
22.1
4-14
33,1
24,0
522
356
13
26
1,9
1,9
21
2.6
29
1.9
21
15
275
21
15
275
21
316
316
316
1 1091
1091
1091
1535
1535
1535
10910
10910
10910
15360
15350
15350
403 i
403
403
1414
1414
1414
2012
2012
2012
13092
13092
13092
19M 2'
19832
1980 2
t,28
1,28
1,28
t,30
1,30
130
131
131
1,31
120
1 20
120
129
129
129
0 004
0 004
0 004
00137
00137
00137
00130
00130
00130
00137
00137
00137
00130
00130
00130
0 004
0 004
0 004
00149
00149
00149
00084
00084
00084
0 0114
0 0f 14
00114
00101
00101
00101
546 ,, 2663 1181
372
8846
971
1 74
2131
663
74
30,2
15.7
40
32.3
102
027 i f 71 062
05
64
1.1
02
17
0.6
05
1 75
1
025
17
06
0 002 0 029 0 013
00030
0,1180
00150
00100
1 00730
0 0260
0.006
0 086
0 020
0 010
0 061
0 030
05 78 34
C2
7.9
f,d
12
66
31
05
75
25
1
8
3
00129 00599 00390
00210
02690
00600
00000
0o080
0 0010
00100
01500
00600
0 0100
01500
00600
37 ! 29 29
28
32
3
23
35
29
18
29
20
10
32
21
29 1.8 20
23
15
t9
16
19
10
18
3
2
18
3
2
46 233 ? 233
171
301
236
159
327
252
189
201
213
204
300
24,3
16 09 08
17
1,0
1,5
,11
1,5
14
13
18
15
12
15
135
218 138 138
85
146
115
97
196
125
147
224
18,1
16.0
241
195
t 1 0,9 0,7
1 1
1 1
13
t 0
1,5
1,1
1
13
1 15
1
1 3
1 15
1871 , 5857 3086
247
1802
714
27
2514
1083
80
345
230
56
417
272
09 38 t6
03
13
OS
0,3
19
10
06
2
15
06
22
16
34.13 1274 - 5788
1077
426
261
112
4054
2232
206
862
47,2
208
949
424
17 82 30
14
3,1
20
12
31
20
14
5
3
13
5
25
177 181 i 102
1
97
97
97
4
4
4
97
97
97
4
4
4
29 37 32
25
25
25
27
27
27
25
25
25
27
27
27
35 45 44
26
26
26
57
57
57
26
26
26
57
57
57
93 382 1125
21
21
21
29
29
29
21
21
21 1
29
29
29

Restoration Plan • Duke University Water Reclamation Pond Stream Mitigation
USGS HUC 03030002 • Durham County, North Carolina • October 2012
Photo 1 — Highly eroded banks (Northern Tributary)
Photo 2 — Highly eroded banks (Northern Tributary)
AEcoEngineering
A division of The John R McAdams Company, Inc.

Restoration Plan • Duke University Water Reclamation Pond Stream Mitigation
USGS HUC 03030002 • Durham County, North Carolina • October 2012
Photo 3 — Highly eroded banks (Northern Tributary)
[aEcoEngineering
A dMsion ofThc John R. McAdams Compafry, Inc.

Restoration Plan • Duke University Water Reclamation Pond Stream Mitigation
USGS HUC 03030002 • Durham County, North Carolina • October 2012
Photo 4 — Highly eroded banks (Central Tributary)
Photo 5 — Bricks located within the banks (Central Tributary)
[jEcoEngineering
A division of The John R McAdams Company, Inc.

Restoration Plan • Duke University Water Reclamation Pond Stream Mitigation
USGS HUC 03030002 • Durham County, North Carolina • October 2012
Photo 6 — Highly eroded banks (Central Tributary)
Photo 7 — Existing utility crossing (Central Tributary)
[jEcoEngineering
A division of The John R. McAdams Company, Inc.

Restoration Plan • Duke University Water Reclamation Pond Stream Mitigation
USGS HUC 03030002 • Durham County, North Carolina • October 2012
Photo 8 — Highly eroded banks (Southern Tributary)
Photo 9 — Highly eroded banks and bricks (Southern Tributary)
[jEcoEngineering
A division of The John R McAdams Com{wny, Inc.

Restoration Plan • Duke University Water Reclamation Pond Stream Mitigation
USGS HUC 03030002 • Durham County, North Carolina • October 2012
Photo 10 — Highly eroded banks (Southern Tributary)
FjfftoEngineering
4 di ision orThc John R McAdams Company, Joe.

INSTRUCTIONS FOR SILT FENCE
INSTALLATION
1. REFER TO THE PLANS FOR LOCATION, EXTENT AND SPECIFICATIONS. IF THERE ARE QUESTIONS OR PROBLEMS WITH
THE LOCATIONS, EXTENT OR METHOD OF INSTALLATION, CONTACT THE ENGINEER, ARCHITECT OR CONTROL PERSONNEL
ON THE SITE FOR ASSISTANCE. EROSION CONTROL PERSONNEL HAVE COPIES OF INSTRUCTIONS AND MAY HAVE
PHOTOGRAPHS OF PROPERLY INSTALLED SILT FENCES AS AN AID TO INSTALLATION.
2. IF THE SILT FENCE IS NOT INSTALLED CORRECTLY THE FIRST TIME IT WILL HAVE TO BE REBUILT.
DETERMINE THE LOCATION ON THE GROUND TAKING INTO CONSIDERATION:
A SILT BARRIER (PREFABRICATED SILT FENCE) CANNOT BE SUBSTITUTED!! THE
SILT FENCE MUST BE CONSTRUCTED AS DESCRIBED IN THESE INSTRUCTIONS.
ALLOW SUFFICIENT SPACE FOR MAINTENANCE, GRADING, FILLING AND OTHER
CONSTRUCTION ACTMTY BETWEEN THE SILT FENCE AND THE CONSTRUCTION
SITE.
ALLOW AT LEAST:
15 FEET BETWEEN THE FENCE AND SINGLE -STORY BUILDINGS.
25 FEET BETWEEN THE FENCE AND MULTIPLE -STORY BUILDINGS.
10 FEET BETWEEN THE FENCE AND THE TOE OF FILL SLOPES.
WHERE POSSIBLE, INSTALL THE SILT FENCE ON THE CONTOUR SO THAT RUNOFF
GOES THROUGH THE SLIT FENCE AND DOES NOT FLOW ALONG THE SILT FENCE
AT THE LOWEST POINT. WHERE PONDING DOES OCCUR SILT FENCE OUTLETS
MAY BE NECESSARY SO THAT THE FENCE DOES NOT COLLAPSE.
3. CLEAR THE LOCATION OF THE SILT FENCE, CLEARING ONLY WHAT IS NEEDED TO PROVIDE ACCESS TO PERSONNEL
AND EQUIPMENT FOR INSTALLATION. IT IS PERMISSIBLE TO PLACE THE SILT FENCE IN THE EDGE OF EXISTING TREES
AS LONG AS THE OWNER ALLOWS IT AND CARE IS TAKEN TO PROTECT THESE TREES DURING INSTALLATION
MAINTENANCE AND REMOVAL IF THE TREES ARE TO REMAIN AFTER CONSTRUCTION. DO NOT ATTACH THE FILTER FABRIC
TO THE TREES, AS IT MAKES BURYING THE TOES IMPOSSIBLE.
4. EXCAVATE A 6 INCH X 6 INCH TRENCH ALONG THE LOCATION OF THE FENCE, USING A "DITCH WITCH" IS HELPFUL
5. ALONG THE LOWER SIDE OF THE TRENCH, PLACE STEEL FENCE POSTS NO MORE THAN 8 FEET APART AND DRIVE
THEM 18 INCHES INTO THE GROUND.
6. ATTACH WIRE FENCE ( "HOG WIRE" OF MINIMUM 14 GAUGE WITH MAXIMUM MESH OF 6 INCHES) TO THE UPHILL SIDE
OF THE POSTS AND PLACE 12 INCHES OF THE BOTTOM OF THE FENCE INTO THE TRENCH. DO NOT USE "CHICKEN
WIRE ". USE WIRE TO FASTEN THE FENCE TO THE POSTS. THE COMPLETED FENCE MUST BE AT LEAST 2 FEET HIGH
AND NOT MORE THAN 3 FEET HIGH.
7. ATTACH SYNTHETIC FILTER TO THE UPSIDE OF THE WIRE FENCE WITH STAPLES A MINIMUM OF 12 INCHES APART AND
PLACE 12 INCHES OF THE FABRIC INTO THE TRENCH WITH THE WIRE FENCE. USE ROLLS OF FABRIC AND CUT TO THE
NECESSARY LENGTH IN ORDER TO MINIMIZE THE NUMBER OF JOINTS.
8. BACKFILL THE TRENCH AND TAMP THE FILL TO FIRMLY ANCHOR THE BOTTOM OF THE FILTER FABRIC AND WIRE FENCE
TO PREVENT WATER FROM FROM FLOWING UNDER THE FENCE; MAKE IT GO THROUGH THE FILTER FABRIC.
9. WHERE IT IS IMPOSSIBLE TO INSTALL THE SILT FENCE ON THE CONTOUR, RUNOFF WILL FLOW ALONG THE FENCE AND
POND AT THE LOWEST POINT, WHERE THE TOTAL DRAINAGE AREA TO THE POINT OF PONDING IS GREATER THAN 5,000
SQUARE FEET (FOR EXAMPLE: A SQUARE 70 FEET ON A SIDE), A SILT FENCE OUTLET IS REQUIRED; WHERE THE
DRAINAGE ARE IS GREATER THAN 10,000 SQUARE FEET (FOR EXAMPLE: A SQUARE 100 FEET ON A SIDE), A SEDIMENT
TRAP IS NECESSARY. THE LOCATION OF THIS OUTLET MAY BE SHOWN ON THE PLAN, BUT CHECK THE INSTALLATION IN
THE FIELD WHEN THE WIRE FENCE IS UP TO DETERMINE IF ADDITIONAL OUTLETS ARE NEEDED. SEE THE DETAILS OF
THE SILT FENCE FOR INSTRUCTIONS.
MAINTENANCE
MATERIALS, EQUIPMENT AND PERSONNEL MUST BE AVAILABLE FOR MAINTENANCE AT ALL
TIMES
1. INSPECT THE SILT FENCE:
DURING CONSTRUCTION: TO SEE IF MACHINERY OR FALLING TREES HAVE
DAMAGED THE SILT FENCE, REPAIR IT. TO SEE THAT FILL MATERIAL HAS
NOT ACCUMULATED AGAINST THE FENCE; IF IT HAS, REMOVE THAT MATERIAL,
REPAIR THE FENCE AND MOVE THE FENCE OR FILL SO THAT IT DOES NOT
HAPPEN AGAIN.
AFTER EACH RAINFALL: TO SEE IF RUNOFF IS NOT FLOWING UNDER THE FENCE;
IF IT IS, BURY THE BOTTOM OF THE FENCE CORRECTLY. TO SEE THAT RUNOFF
HAS NOT TOPPED THE FENCE IN LOW POINTS; IF IT HAS, AN OUTLET MAY BE
NEEDED AT THAT POINT TO PREVENT FUTURE FAILURES.
2. CLEAN OUT ACCUMULATED SEDIMENT WHEN IT REACHES A DEPTH OF ONE -HALF THE HEIGHT OF THE FILTER FABRIC.
PLACE THE SEDIMENT IN A DISPOSAL AREA OR, IF APPROPRIATE, MIX IT WITH DRY SOIL ON THE SITE.
3. DO NOT DISPOSE OF SEDIMENT IN A MANNER THAT WILL CREATE AN EROSION HAZARD. DO NOT ERECT A NEW SILT
FENCE ON TOP OF ACCUMULATED SEDIMENT BEHIND THE FENCE.
4. REPAIR ANY BREAKS OR ROTTED PLACES IN THE FILTER FABRIC.
5. IF THE FENCE IS SAGGING BETWEEN POSTS, INSTALL ADDITIONAL POSTS.
6. WHEN MAKING REPAIRS, ALWAYS RESTORE THE SILT FENCE TO ITS ORIGINAL DESIGN CONFIGURATION.
REMOVAL
1. WHEN GRADING IN THE DRAINAGE AREA ABOVE THE SILT FENCE HAS BEEN FINISHED AND DISTURBED AREAS
SUFFICIENTLY STABILIZED TO RESTRAIN EROSION, THE SILT FENCE AND ANY OUTLETS MAY BE REMOVED.
2. REMOVE ANY ACCUMULATED SEDIMENT AND DISPOSE OF IT PROPERLY.
3. REMOVE POSTS, FENCE AND FABRIC; DISPOSE OF THEM PROPERLY.
4. STABILIZE THE DISTURBED AREA WHERE THE FENCE WAS LOCATED.
FILTER
(CAVATE A 6" X 6"
H ALONG THE LOCATION
E FENCE. DRIVE POSTS
TO THE GROUND ON
OWER SIDE OF THE
H. ATTACH WIRE FENCE
WIRE) TO THE POSTS
:XTEND THE BOTTOM 12"
"HE TRENCH.
6" X 6"
TRENCH
2. ATTACH THE FILTER
FABRIC TO THE WIRE FENCE
WITH STAPLES AND EXTEND
THE BOTTOM 12" INTO THE
BOTTOM OF THE TRENCH. USE
A SYNTHETIC FABRIC
D0 NOT USE BURLAP !II
3. BACKFILL THE TRENCH
AND COMPACT SOIL TO
SECURELY ANCHOR THE
BOTTOM
.. ..... STEEL POST
"HOG WIRE"
NOT
CHICKEN WIRE
SYNTHETIC
FILTER
FABRIC
BOTTOM WIRE FENCE
AND FILTER FABRIC
BURIED IN THE
EXCAVATED TRENCH
AN ACCEPTABLE ALTERNATIVE TO BURYING
THE BOTTOM OF THE FENCE IS TO LAY 12"
OF THE FENCE AND FABRIC ON THE
GROUND AND COVER IT WITH 6" OF WASHED
STONE, BUT NOT JUST SOIL.
ILLUSTRATION OF A
SILT FENCE INSTALLATION
(NOT TO SCALE)
INSTRUCTIONS FOR SILT FENCE OUTLET
INSTALLATION
1. REFER TO THE PLANS FOR LOCATIONS AND SPECIFICATIONS.
DURING INSTALLATION OF THE SILT BARRIER OR SILT FENCE,
INSPECT THE INSTALLATION TO DETERMINE IF OUTLETS ARE NEEDED
ACCORDING TO THE CRITERIA SET FORTH IN THE SPECIFICATIONS
FOR THE BARRIER AND FENCE. IF THERE ARE Q UESTIONS OR
PROBLEMS WITH THE LOCATION EXTENT OR METHOD OF
INSTALLATION CONTACT THE ENGINEER ARCHITECT OR
RESPONSIBLE PERSONNEL ON THE SITE FOR ASSISTANCE. EROSION
CONTROL PERSONNEL HAVE COPIES OF INSTRUCTIONS AND MAY
HAVE PHOTOGRAPHS OF PROPERLY INSTALLED OUTLETS AS AN AID
TO INSTALLATION.
IF THE SILT FENCE OUTLET IS NOT INSTALLED CORRECTLY THE
FIRST TIME, IT WILL HAVE TO BE REBUILT.
2. DETERMINE THE EXACT LOCATION ON THE GROUND BEFORE
COMPLETING INSTALLATION OF THE SILT FENCE TAKING INTO
CONSIDERATION:
• INSTALL THE OUTLET AT THE LOWEST POINT (S) IN THE BARRIER
OR FENCE WHERE WATER WILL POND.
• INSTALL THE OUTLET WHERE IT IS ACCESSIBLE FOR INSTALLATION,
MAINTENANCE, AND REMOVAL
• ALLOW AT LEAST:
15 FEET BETWEEN THE BARRIER OR FENCE AND SINGLE -STORY
BUILDINGS.
25 FEET FOR FORK LIFTS BETWEEN THE BARRIER OR FENCE AND
MULTIPLE -STORY BUILDINGS.
10 FEET BETWEEN THE BARRIER OR FENCE AND THE TOE OF FILL
SLOPES.
• PLACE THE OUTLET SO THAT WATER FLOWING THROUGH IT WILL
NOT CREATE AN EROSION HAZARD BELOW: AVOID STEEP SLOPES
BELOW THE OUTLET AND AREAS WITHOUT PROTECTIVE VEGETATION.
USE SLOPE DRAINS IF NECESSARY.
• DETERMINE THE LOCATION OF THE OUTLET: FOR A SILT BARRIER,
WHEN THE TRENCH IS DUG TO BURY THE BOTTOM OF THE FABRIC
BECAUSE THE BARRIER WILL BE OMITTED AT THE OUTLET; FOR A
SILT FENCE, WHEN THE WIRE FENCE IS IN PLACE BECAUSE THE
FILTER FABRIC WILL BE OMITTED AT THE OUTLET.
3. REFER TO THE ILLUSTRATIONS OF THE OUTLET IN THE PLAN.
4. CLEAR STUMPS AND ROOTS FROM THE LOCATION OF THE OUTLET.
CLEAR ADEQUATE ACCESS FOR THE EQUIPMENT NEEDED FOR
INSTALLATION, MAINTENANCE, AND REMOVAL
5. FOR A SILT BARRIER:
• JUST BELOW THE GAP IN THE BARRIER, PLACE A LAYER OF FILTER
FABRIC ON THE GROUND TO PROTECT THE SOIL FROM EROSION BY
OUTFLOW FROM THE OUTLET, PLACE 6 INCHES OF THE UPPER
EDGE IN THE TRENCH. STAKE THE REMAINING EDGES OF THE
FABRIC TO HOLD IT IN PLACE.
• ALONG THE GAP WHERE THE OUTLET WILL GO, PLACE STEEL FENCE
POSTS FOR STRENGTH. THE POSTS MUST BE A MAXIMUM OF 2
FEET APART AND DRIVEN INTO SOLID GROUND AT LEAST 18
INCHES.
• PLACE HARDWARE CLOTH (WELDED GALVANIZED SCREEN WITH
SQUARE 1/4 - 1/2 -INCH HOLES) ON THE UPHILL SIDE OF THE
POSTS TO HOLD THE WASHED STONE IN PLACE. PUT 6 INCHES OF
THE BOTTOM OF THE CLOTH IN THE TRENCH AND FASTEN IT TO
THE POSTS WITH LENGTHS OF WIRE.
• BURY THE BOTTOM OF THE HARDWARE CLOTH AND THE UPPER
EDGE OF THE FILTER FABRIC BELOW THE OUTLET IN THE TRENCH
AND COMPACT THE FILL
• PLACE A FILTER OF 1 -INCH DIAMETER WASHED STONE ON THE
UPHILL SIDE OF THE OUTLET. PILE THE STONE UP TO THE TOP OF
THE HARDWARE CLOTH AND OVER THE JOINT BETWEEN THE OUTLET
AND THE BARRIER.
6. FOR A SILT FENCE:
• JUST BELOW THE GAP IN THE BARRIER, PLACE A LAYER OF FILTER
FABRIC ON THE GROUND TO PROTECT THE SOIL FROM EROSION BY
OUTFLOW FROM THE OUTLET, 6 INCHES OF THE UPPER
EDGE IN THE TRENCH. STAKE THE OTHER EDGES OF THE FABRIC
TO HOLD IT IN PLACE.
• ALONG THE GAP WHERE THE OUTLET WILL GO, PLACE ADDITIONAL
STEEL FENCE POSTS FOR STRENGTH. THE POSTS MUST BE A
MAXIMUM OF 2 FEET APART AND DRIVEN INTO SOLID GROUND AT
LEAST 18 INCHES.
• PLACE HARDWARE CLOTH (WELDED GALVANIZED SCREEN WITH
SQUARE 1/4 - 1/2 -INCH HOLES) ON THE UPHILL SIDE OF THE
POSTS TO HOLD THE WASHED STONE IN PLACE. PUT 6 INCHES OF
THE BOTTOM OF THE CLOTH IN THE TRENCH AND FASTEN IT TO
THE POSTS WITH LENGTHS OF WIRE.
• BURY THE BOTTOM OF THE HARDWARE CLOTH, THE UPPER EDGE
OF THE FILTER FABRIC BELOW THE OUTLET, AND THE WIRE FENCE
IN THE TRENCH AND COMPACT THE FILL
• -
PLACE A FILTER OF 1 INCH DIAMETER WASHED STONE ON THE
UPHILL SIDE OF THE OUTLET. PILE THE STONE UP TO THE TOP OF
THE HARDWARE CLOTH AND OVER THE JOINT BETWEEN THE OUTLET
AND THE SILT FENCE.
MAINTENANCE
MATERIALS, EQUIPMENT, AND PERSONNEL MUST BE AVAILABLE FOR
MAINTENANCE AT ALL TIMES.
1. INSPECT THE SILT FENCE:
• DURING CONSTRUCTION: TO DETERMINE IF MACHINERY, FALLING
TREES, ETC. HAVE DAMAGED THE BARRIER, FENCE, OR OUTLET, IF
DAMAGED, MAKE REPAIRS. TO SEE THAT FILL MATERIAL HAS NOT
ACCUMULATED AGAINST THE OUTLET, BLOCKING OUTFLOW; IF IT HAS,
REMOVE THE MATERIAL, REPAIR THE DAMAGE, AND MOVE THE
FENCE OR FILL SO THAT IT DOES NOT HAPPEN AGAIN.
• AFTER EACH RAINFALL TO DETERMINE IF RUNOFF FLOWING
THROUGH THE OUTLET HAS CAUSED DAMAGE BY UNDERMINING THE
FENCE OR OUTLET, OR IF ACCUMULATED WATER HAS COLLAPSED
THE OUTLET. IF IT HAS, MAKE REPAIRS OR INSTALL A SEDIMENT
TRAP IF NECESSARY TO PREVENT FUTURE FAILURES.
2. CLEAN OUT ACCUMULATED SEDIMENT WHEN IT REACHES A DEPTH
OF ONE -HALF THE HEIGHT OF THE OUTLET. PLACE THE SEDIMENT
IN A DISPOSAL AREA, OR MIX IT WITH DRY SOIL ON THE SITE IF
APPROPRIATE.
DO NOT DISPOSE OF SEDIMENT IN A MANNER THAT WILL CREATE
AN EROSION HAZARD.
3. WHEN THE WASHED STONE BECOMES CLOGGED WITH SEDIMENT AND
DEBRIS, SCRAPE THE CONTAMINATED STONE OFF, DISPOSE OF IT
PROPERLY, AND REPLACE IT WITH CLEAN STONE.
4. REPAIR THE OUTLET IF DAMAGED BY USE OR DURING MAINTENANCE.
REBUILD IT TO THE ORIGINAL CONFIGURATION.
REMOVAL
1. WHEN GRADING IN THE DRAINAGE AREA ABOVE THE OUTLET HAS
BEEN COMPLETED AND DISTURBED AREAS SUFFICIENTLY STABILIZED
TO RESTRAIN EROSION, THE OUTLET MUST BE REMOVED.
2. CLEAN OUT ACCUMULATED SEDIMENT AND DISPOSE OF IT
PROPERLY.
3. REMOVE POSTS, FENCE, FABRIC WIRE, AND WASHED STONE;
DISPOSE OF THEM PROPERLY.
4. GRADE THE LOCATION AS NECESSARY.
5. STABILIZE THE DISTURBED AREA WHERE THE OUTLET WAS LOCATED.
EXISTING GROUND
PUMP HOSE
SEDIMENT FILTER
BAG
INSTRUCTIONS FOR GRAVEL CONSTRUCTION EXIT
INSTALLATION:
1. REFER TO PLANS FOR LOCATION AND SPECIFICATIONS. IF THERE ARE QUESTIONS OR PROBLEMS WITH THE LOCATION
OR METHODS OF INSTALLATION CONTACT THE ENGINEER, ARCHITECT OR RESPONSIBLE PERSONNEL ON THE SITE FOR
ASSISTANCE. EROSION CONTROL PERSONNEL HAVE COPIES OF INSTRUCTIONS AND PHOTOGRAPHS OF PROPERLY
INSTALLED EXITS AS AN AID TO INSTALLATION.
IF THE CONSTRUCTION EXIT IS NOT INSTALLED CORRECTLY THE FIRST TIME, IT HALL HAVE TO BE REBUILT.
2. DETERMINE THE LOCATION ON THE GROUND, TAKING INTO CONSIDERATION:
• THE CONSTRUCTION EXIT MUST BE IN PLACE DURING ALL PHASES OF CONSTRUCTION; IF THE LOCATION IS TO BE
GRADED, THE EXIT MUST BE INSTALLED FOR THE INITIAL WORK, REMOVED TO ALLOW GRADING OF THE LOCATION, AND
REPLACED IMMEDIATELY AFTER GRADING SO THAT IT IS IN PLACE AND FUNCTIONING AT ALL TIMES.
IF THE SITE WILL HAVE A LARGE NUMBER OF VEHICLES USING THE EXIT IT IS ADVISABLE TO HAVE A DIVIDED
ENTRANCE THAT DIRECTS ENTERING TRAFFIC THROUGH A SEPARATE TRAVEL WAY PARALLEL TO THE GRAVEL
CONSTRUCTION EXIT IN ORDER OT REDUCE THE NUMBER OF TRIPS OVER THE STONE, INCREASING THE LIFE OF THE
GRAVEL, AND REDUCING MAINTENANCE, REFER TO THE ILLUSTRATION FOR DETAILS.
• RUNOFF AND SEDIMENT FROM THE SITE MUST BE DIRECTED AWAY FROM THE EXIT SO THAT IT DOES NOT FLOW INTO
HE STREET OR OTHER OFF -SITE AREA; CHOOSE A LOCATION FOR THE EXIT THAT WILL MAKE IT EASY TO DIVERT THE
RUNOFF TO SEDIMENT - TRAPPING DEVICES.
• IF THE PERSON RESPONSIBLE FOR THE DISTURBANCE FAILS TO TAKE INITIATIVE TO KEEP SOIL AND DEBRIS ON THE
SITE ENFORCEMENT ACTION MAY BE TAKEN AGAINST THE SITE AND THE GRADING PERMIT REVOKED AND /OR A STOP
WORK ORDER ISSUED.
3. CLEAR THE LOCATION OF THE EXIT, REMOVING STUMPS, ROOTS AND OTHER VEGETATION IN ORDER TO PROVIDE A
FIRM FOUNDATION SO THAT THE STONE IS NOT PRESSED INTO SOFT GROUND. CLEAR ENOUGH WIDTH TO ALLOW
PASSAGE OF LARGE VEHICLES, BUT CLEAR ONLY WHAT IS NECESSARY FOR THE EXIT. DO NOT CLEAR ADJACENT AREAS
UNTIL THE REQUIRED EROSION CONTROL DEVICES ARE IN PLACE. IF THE SOIL AT THE LOCATION IS SOFT IT IS
ADVISABLE TO PLACE A 6 TO 8 INCH LAYER OF CRUSHER RUN STONE DOWN FIRST TO PROVIDE A FIRM FOUNDATION
AND PREVENT THE WASHED STONE BEING PRESSED INTO THE GROUND.
4. AT THE LOCATION OF THE EXIT, PLACE AN 8 -INCH LAYER OF WASHED STONE 2 TO 3 INCHES IN DIAMETER AT
LEAST 50 FEET LONG AND AS WIDE AS THE FULL WIDTH OF THE EXIT OR AT LEAST 10 FEET WIDE. FLARE THE END OF
THE STONE WHERE IT MEETS THE PAVEMENT SO THAT THE WHEELS OF TURNING VEHICLES REMAIN ON STONE AND DO
NOT TRAVEL OVER UNPROTECTED SOIL.
5. A SQUARE -EDGED SHOVEL AND BROOM WITH STIFF BRISTLES MUST BE PROVIDED AT THE EXIT FOR
REMOVING ANY MUD THAT MAY BE TRACKED INTO THE STREET.
USE:
1. AS VEHICLES LEAVING THE SITE DRIVE ACROSS THE WASHED STONE THE ABRASIVE ACTION OF THE WASHED
STONE SHOULD BE REMOVE SEDIMENT FROM THE TIRES. IT MAY BE NECESSARY TO USE A SHOVEL TO REMOVE
MUD TRAPPED BETWEEN DUAL WHEELS.
2. ANY SOIL TRACKED FROM THE SITE MUST BE REMOVED IMMEDIATELY. A SHOVEL AND BROOM MUST BE USED
TO REMOVE AS MUCH SOIL AS POSSIBLE BEFORE WASHING PAVEMENT.
MAINTENANCE
MATERIALS, EQUIPMENT AND PERSONNEL MUST BE AVAILABLE FOR MAINTENANCE AT ALL TIMES.
1. WHEN THE STONE IS THE EXIT BECOMES CONTAMINATED NTH SOIL AND ITS FUNCTION IS REDUCED TO WHERE
SEDIMENT IS BEING TRACKED INTO THE STREET, A 4 -INCH LAYER OF CLEAN STONE MUST BE ADDED.
2. DIVERSIONS USED TO DIRECT RUNOFF AWAY FROM THE EXIT TO SEDIMENT - TRAPPING DEVICES MUST BE
MAINTAINED ACCORDING TO SPECIFICATIONS FOR THOSE DEVICES.
3. THE GRAVEL CONSTRUCTION EXIT MUST BE MAINTAINED SO THAT MUD AND DUST ARE KEPT ON -SITE.
PROBLEMS MUST BE ANTICIPATED AND PREVENTIVE MAINTENANCE MUST BE PERFORMED.
REMOVAL
1. WHEN THE GRAVEL CONSTRUCTION EXIT IS NO LONGER NEEDED , WHEN THE TRAVEL WAYS HAVE BEEN
STABILIZED AND THE POTENTIAL FOR TRACKING SOIL AND DEBRIS INTO THE STREET HAS BEEN REMOVED, THE
GRAVEL CONSTRUCTION EXIT MAY BE REMOVED.
2. THE STONE AND ANY SEDIMENT SHOULD BE REMOVED AND PROPERLY DISPOSED OF WHERE THE WALL NOT
CREATE AN EROSION HAZARD.
A
IT IS ADVISABLE TO PROVIDE A ,
SEPARATE ENTRANCE TO May A MINIMUM
REDUCE TRAFFIC ACROSS THE 12
EXIT AND WEAR AND \ KEEP A BROOM AND
MAINTENANCE \\ SHOVEL CLOSE TO
THE EXIT TO CLEAN
THE EXIT LOCATION MUST SLOPE THE STREET
AWAY FROM THE STREET OR STEPS
MUST BE TAKEN (GRADING,
DIVERSIONS, ETC) TO PREVENT
RUNOFF FLOWING INTO THE STREET
LAYER OF 2 " -3"
WASHED STONE
8" FOUNDATION OF COMPACTED
RUN STONE
SECTION A -A'
CONSTRUCTIONE ENTRANCE/E= DETAIL
N To
BANKFULL STAGE
BLANKET KEYED 6 INCH MIN. ':.�
6 " -12"
BACKFILLED AND
COMPACTED
EROSION CONTROL
(COIR) MAT ANCHORING
CROSS- SECTION VIEW
APPROPRIATE SIZE `
12"-24"
RIP RAP PAD C O STREAM BANK
MIN. THICKNESS 8" STREAM I I
�O o
CLASS A OR B JOU 6 " -� 2"
O
:... .:....
OJ�O
EROSION CONTR FILTER FABRIC
J
STONE J� O( FOR DRAINAGE �S� MIN.
OL O�
1 >Z1 C1f 1 �Y,
(NON - WOVEN) EDGE ANCHORING
SECTION A -A'
ROCK CHECK DAM DETAIL
NOT TO SCALE
NOTES:
AT THE DESIGNER'S DISCRETION, ALTERNATE DEWATERING
STRUCTURES MAY BE USED (i.e. SEDIMENT TANKS, FILTER BOX,
STRAW BALE /SILT FENSE PIT). HOWEVER, REGARDLESS OF THE
DEWATERING STRUCTURE USED, ALL MUST BE SIZED AND
OPERATE TO ALLOW ALL PUMPED WATER TO BE FILTERED TO
PREVENT SEDIMENTS FROM ESCAPING THE SITE.
PROFILE VIEW
TEMPORARY DEWATERING STRUCTURE DETAIL
NOT TO SCALE
MATCH MAT EDGE ELEVATIO1
WITH BASE FLOW ELEVATION
CROSS - SECTION
24" ECOSTAKE OR
EQUIVALENT INSTALLED
AT TOE OF SLOPE,
CHANNEL
EROSION CONTROL
(COIR) MAT ANCHORING
ISOMETRIC VIEW
0..
1 FOOT MIN.
EROSION CONTROL BLANKET
BLANKET KEYED 6 INCH MIN.
FLOW
EROSION CONTROL MATTING,
ANCHOR IN TRENCH ® BOTH
TOP AND BOTTOM EDGES
BOTH - I _ 3. BOTH
24" ECOSTAKE OR
EQUIVALENT INSTALLED
ABOVE TOE OF SLOPE
EROSION CONTROL
COIR) MAT ANCHORING
PLAN VIEW
l
12" & 24"
/Xl AS DIRECTED
NORTH AMERICAN GREEN
EC ❑STAKES OR EQUIVALENT
ECO -STAKE
PROFILE VIEW
NOTES:
1. THE COIR FIBER MAT SHALL BE USED
TO STABILIZE THE NEWLY CONSTRUCTED
CHANNEL FROM THE TOP OF BANK TO TOE OF
SLOPE.
2. THE CHANNEL SIDE SLOPES SHALL BE FINE
GRADED, SEEDED, FERTILIZED, AND LIMED PRIOR
TO INSTALLING THE EROSION CONTROL
BLANKET.
3. THE EROSION CONTROL BLANKET SHALL CONSIST
OF A MACHINE - PRODUCED BLANKET MADE OF
COCONUT FIBER. SEE SPECS.
4. THE STAPLES SHALL BE MADE OF WOOD
SHAPED WITH LEGS 18" IN LENGTH AND A 1"
CROWN. STAPLES SHALL BE SPACED ACCORDING
TO THE BLANKET MANUFACTURERS
INSTRUCTIONS TO ENSURE THE MATTING IS HELD
FIRMLY IN PLACE.
EROSION CONTROL MAT ANCHORING DETAILS
NOT TO SCALE
PRELIMINARY DRAWING - NOT RELEASED FOP, CONSTRUCTION
0)
•
r�"-i W w
■ � ,�"� cat
U
E � o
0 5
rr
z
z ��
v, W a � d'
q
0 v
c
W
F-�
0
O o z U y
z��
um
d= It
W o
,7 a oa =
W0.i
W d
W o
U'
z
W
O
y
F
z
W
P4 !4
4WD
E-4 a a z
cn A 0
Imo' F,
W zz�
�E
z wxo
z
z
E'' x
d�
W �
O �
a
z
O
6 6z
z �
°
U W
a
O
z
z
U
O z
0
�D U Q
N�
W
w
AQ
V)
c�
a
U
PROJECT N0. DKU -8010
FILENAME: DKU8010 -D1
DESIGNED BY: AN G
DRAWN BY: AN G
SCALE: N.T.S.
DATE: 10-26-2012
SHEET N0.
D -1
E���
END OF
/FILTER FABRIC
SILT FENCE
4' MIN.
STEEL FENCE POST
T
WIRE FENCE -
HARDWARE CLOTH
TOP OF SILT FENCE
MUST BE AT LEAST
- FILTER OF 1" DIA. WASHED STONE
V ABOVE THE TOP
FILTER FABRIC
OF THE WASHED
ON GROUND
STONE
SILT FENCE
BURY WIRE FENCE AND
END OF
HARDWARE CLOTH
STEEL FENCE POST
FILTER FABRIC
SET MAX. 2' APART
BURY WIRE FENCE, FILTER
FABRIC, AND HARDWARE
CLOTH IN TRENCH
PLAN VIEW SECTION
FRONT VIEW
SILT FENCE GRAVEL OUTLET DETAIL
NOT TO SCALE
EXISTING GROUND
PUMP HOSE
SEDIMENT FILTER
BAG
INSTRUCTIONS FOR GRAVEL CONSTRUCTION EXIT
INSTALLATION:
1. REFER TO PLANS FOR LOCATION AND SPECIFICATIONS. IF THERE ARE QUESTIONS OR PROBLEMS WITH THE LOCATION
OR METHODS OF INSTALLATION CONTACT THE ENGINEER, ARCHITECT OR RESPONSIBLE PERSONNEL ON THE SITE FOR
ASSISTANCE. EROSION CONTROL PERSONNEL HAVE COPIES OF INSTRUCTIONS AND PHOTOGRAPHS OF PROPERLY
INSTALLED EXITS AS AN AID TO INSTALLATION.
IF THE CONSTRUCTION EXIT IS NOT INSTALLED CORRECTLY THE FIRST TIME, IT HALL HAVE TO BE REBUILT.
2. DETERMINE THE LOCATION ON THE GROUND, TAKING INTO CONSIDERATION:
• THE CONSTRUCTION EXIT MUST BE IN PLACE DURING ALL PHASES OF CONSTRUCTION; IF THE LOCATION IS TO BE
GRADED, THE EXIT MUST BE INSTALLED FOR THE INITIAL WORK, REMOVED TO ALLOW GRADING OF THE LOCATION, AND
REPLACED IMMEDIATELY AFTER GRADING SO THAT IT IS IN PLACE AND FUNCTIONING AT ALL TIMES.
IF THE SITE WILL HAVE A LARGE NUMBER OF VEHICLES USING THE EXIT IT IS ADVISABLE TO HAVE A DIVIDED
ENTRANCE THAT DIRECTS ENTERING TRAFFIC THROUGH A SEPARATE TRAVEL WAY PARALLEL TO THE GRAVEL
CONSTRUCTION EXIT IN ORDER OT REDUCE THE NUMBER OF TRIPS OVER THE STONE, INCREASING THE LIFE OF THE
GRAVEL, AND REDUCING MAINTENANCE, REFER TO THE ILLUSTRATION FOR DETAILS.
• RUNOFF AND SEDIMENT FROM THE SITE MUST BE DIRECTED AWAY FROM THE EXIT SO THAT IT DOES NOT FLOW INTO
HE STREET OR OTHER OFF -SITE AREA; CHOOSE A LOCATION FOR THE EXIT THAT WILL MAKE IT EASY TO DIVERT THE
RUNOFF TO SEDIMENT - TRAPPING DEVICES.
• IF THE PERSON RESPONSIBLE FOR THE DISTURBANCE FAILS TO TAKE INITIATIVE TO KEEP SOIL AND DEBRIS ON THE
SITE ENFORCEMENT ACTION MAY BE TAKEN AGAINST THE SITE AND THE GRADING PERMIT REVOKED AND /OR A STOP
WORK ORDER ISSUED.
3. CLEAR THE LOCATION OF THE EXIT, REMOVING STUMPS, ROOTS AND OTHER VEGETATION IN ORDER TO PROVIDE A
FIRM FOUNDATION SO THAT THE STONE IS NOT PRESSED INTO SOFT GROUND. CLEAR ENOUGH WIDTH TO ALLOW
PASSAGE OF LARGE VEHICLES, BUT CLEAR ONLY WHAT IS NECESSARY FOR THE EXIT. DO NOT CLEAR ADJACENT AREAS
UNTIL THE REQUIRED EROSION CONTROL DEVICES ARE IN PLACE. IF THE SOIL AT THE LOCATION IS SOFT IT IS
ADVISABLE TO PLACE A 6 TO 8 INCH LAYER OF CRUSHER RUN STONE DOWN FIRST TO PROVIDE A FIRM FOUNDATION
AND PREVENT THE WASHED STONE BEING PRESSED INTO THE GROUND.
4. AT THE LOCATION OF THE EXIT, PLACE AN 8 -INCH LAYER OF WASHED STONE 2 TO 3 INCHES IN DIAMETER AT
LEAST 50 FEET LONG AND AS WIDE AS THE FULL WIDTH OF THE EXIT OR AT LEAST 10 FEET WIDE. FLARE THE END OF
THE STONE WHERE IT MEETS THE PAVEMENT SO THAT THE WHEELS OF TURNING VEHICLES REMAIN ON STONE AND DO
NOT TRAVEL OVER UNPROTECTED SOIL.
5. A SQUARE -EDGED SHOVEL AND BROOM WITH STIFF BRISTLES MUST BE PROVIDED AT THE EXIT FOR
REMOVING ANY MUD THAT MAY BE TRACKED INTO THE STREET.
USE:
1. AS VEHICLES LEAVING THE SITE DRIVE ACROSS THE WASHED STONE THE ABRASIVE ACTION OF THE WASHED
STONE SHOULD BE REMOVE SEDIMENT FROM THE TIRES. IT MAY BE NECESSARY TO USE A SHOVEL TO REMOVE
MUD TRAPPED BETWEEN DUAL WHEELS.
2. ANY SOIL TRACKED FROM THE SITE MUST BE REMOVED IMMEDIATELY. A SHOVEL AND BROOM MUST BE USED
TO REMOVE AS MUCH SOIL AS POSSIBLE BEFORE WASHING PAVEMENT.
MAINTENANCE
MATERIALS, EQUIPMENT AND PERSONNEL MUST BE AVAILABLE FOR MAINTENANCE AT ALL TIMES.
1. WHEN THE STONE IS THE EXIT BECOMES CONTAMINATED NTH SOIL AND ITS FUNCTION IS REDUCED TO WHERE
SEDIMENT IS BEING TRACKED INTO THE STREET, A 4 -INCH LAYER OF CLEAN STONE MUST BE ADDED.
2. DIVERSIONS USED TO DIRECT RUNOFF AWAY FROM THE EXIT TO SEDIMENT - TRAPPING DEVICES MUST BE
MAINTAINED ACCORDING TO SPECIFICATIONS FOR THOSE DEVICES.
3. THE GRAVEL CONSTRUCTION EXIT MUST BE MAINTAINED SO THAT MUD AND DUST ARE KEPT ON -SITE.
PROBLEMS MUST BE ANTICIPATED AND PREVENTIVE MAINTENANCE MUST BE PERFORMED.
REMOVAL
1. WHEN THE GRAVEL CONSTRUCTION EXIT IS NO LONGER NEEDED , WHEN THE TRAVEL WAYS HAVE BEEN
STABILIZED AND THE POTENTIAL FOR TRACKING SOIL AND DEBRIS INTO THE STREET HAS BEEN REMOVED, THE
GRAVEL CONSTRUCTION EXIT MAY BE REMOVED.
2. THE STONE AND ANY SEDIMENT SHOULD BE REMOVED AND PROPERLY DISPOSED OF WHERE THE WALL NOT
CREATE AN EROSION HAZARD.
A
IT IS ADVISABLE TO PROVIDE A ,
SEPARATE ENTRANCE TO May A MINIMUM
REDUCE TRAFFIC ACROSS THE 12
EXIT AND WEAR AND \ KEEP A BROOM AND
MAINTENANCE \\ SHOVEL CLOSE TO
THE EXIT TO CLEAN
THE EXIT LOCATION MUST SLOPE THE STREET
AWAY FROM THE STREET OR STEPS
MUST BE TAKEN (GRADING,
DIVERSIONS, ETC) TO PREVENT
RUNOFF FLOWING INTO THE STREET
LAYER OF 2 " -3"
WASHED STONE
8" FOUNDATION OF COMPACTED
RUN STONE
SECTION A -A'
CONSTRUCTIONE ENTRANCE/E= DETAIL
N To
BANKFULL STAGE
BLANKET KEYED 6 INCH MIN. ':.�
6 " -12"
BACKFILLED AND
COMPACTED
EROSION CONTROL
(COIR) MAT ANCHORING
CROSS- SECTION VIEW
APPROPRIATE SIZE `
12"-24"
RIP RAP PAD C O STREAM BANK
MIN. THICKNESS 8" STREAM I I
�O o
CLASS A OR B JOU 6 " -� 2"
O
:... .:....
OJ�O
EROSION CONTR FILTER FABRIC
J
STONE J� O( FOR DRAINAGE �S� MIN.
OL O�
1 >Z1 C1f 1 �Y,
(NON - WOVEN) EDGE ANCHORING
SECTION A -A'
ROCK CHECK DAM DETAIL
NOT TO SCALE
NOTES:
AT THE DESIGNER'S DISCRETION, ALTERNATE DEWATERING
STRUCTURES MAY BE USED (i.e. SEDIMENT TANKS, FILTER BOX,
STRAW BALE /SILT FENSE PIT). HOWEVER, REGARDLESS OF THE
DEWATERING STRUCTURE USED, ALL MUST BE SIZED AND
OPERATE TO ALLOW ALL PUMPED WATER TO BE FILTERED TO
PREVENT SEDIMENTS FROM ESCAPING THE SITE.
PROFILE VIEW
TEMPORARY DEWATERING STRUCTURE DETAIL
NOT TO SCALE
MATCH MAT EDGE ELEVATIO1
WITH BASE FLOW ELEVATION
CROSS - SECTION
24" ECOSTAKE OR
EQUIVALENT INSTALLED
AT TOE OF SLOPE,
CHANNEL
EROSION CONTROL
(COIR) MAT ANCHORING
ISOMETRIC VIEW
0..
1 FOOT MIN.
EROSION CONTROL BLANKET
BLANKET KEYED 6 INCH MIN.
FLOW
EROSION CONTROL MATTING,
ANCHOR IN TRENCH ® BOTH
TOP AND BOTTOM EDGES
BOTH - I _ 3. BOTH
24" ECOSTAKE OR
EQUIVALENT INSTALLED
ABOVE TOE OF SLOPE
EROSION CONTROL
COIR) MAT ANCHORING
PLAN VIEW
l
12" & 24"
/Xl AS DIRECTED
NORTH AMERICAN GREEN
EC ❑STAKES OR EQUIVALENT
ECO -STAKE
PROFILE VIEW
NOTES:
1. THE COIR FIBER MAT SHALL BE USED
TO STABILIZE THE NEWLY CONSTRUCTED
CHANNEL FROM THE TOP OF BANK TO TOE OF
SLOPE.
2. THE CHANNEL SIDE SLOPES SHALL BE FINE
GRADED, SEEDED, FERTILIZED, AND LIMED PRIOR
TO INSTALLING THE EROSION CONTROL
BLANKET.
3. THE EROSION CONTROL BLANKET SHALL CONSIST
OF A MACHINE - PRODUCED BLANKET MADE OF
COCONUT FIBER. SEE SPECS.
4. THE STAPLES SHALL BE MADE OF WOOD
SHAPED WITH LEGS 18" IN LENGTH AND A 1"
CROWN. STAPLES SHALL BE SPACED ACCORDING
TO THE BLANKET MANUFACTURERS
INSTRUCTIONS TO ENSURE THE MATTING IS HELD
FIRMLY IN PLACE.
EROSION CONTROL MAT ANCHORING DETAILS
NOT TO SCALE
PRELIMINARY DRAWING - NOT RELEASED FOP, CONSTRUCTION
0)
•
r�"-i W w
■ � ,�"� cat
U
E � o
0 5
rr
z
z ��
v, W a � d'
q
0 v
c
W
F-�
0
O o z U y
z��
um
d= It
W o
,7 a oa =
W0.i
W d
W o
U'
z
W
O
y
F
z
W
P4 !4
4WD
E-4 a a z
cn A 0
Imo' F,
W zz�
�E
z wxo
z
z
E'' x
d�
W �
O �
a
z
O
6 6z
z �
°
U W
a
O
z
z
U
O z
0
�D U Q
N�
W
w
AQ
V)
c�
a
U
PROJECT N0. DKU -8010
FILENAME: DKU8010 -D1
DESIGNED BY: AN G
DRAWN BY: AN G
SCALE: N.T.S.
DATE: 10-26-2012
SHEET N0.
D -1
E���

FILTER FABRIC FOR —
DRAINAGE (NON - WOVEN)
* FOR REPAIR OF SILT FENCE
FAILURES, USE No. 57 WASHED S' MAX.
STONE. FOR ANCHOR WHEN SILT VARIABLE AS DIRECTED BY THE ENGINEER
FENCE IS PROTECTING CATCH BASIN. COMPACTED FILL BASEFLOW
LINED WITH STONE \ r7
MIN. 10 GA.
LINE WIRES
/ STEEL POST
WOVEN WIRE FABRIC
WARNING SIGN
ORANGE, UV RESISTANT,
HIGH - TENSILE STRENGTH,
z POLY BARRICADE FABRIC (TYPICAL)
- o
M 7i
-- GRADE
6" MIN. COVER OVER SKIRT
EXTEND WIRE 6" MIN. INTO TRENCH
AND ANCHOR SKIRT AS DIRECTED
BY ENGINEER
SIDE VIEW
NOTES:
MIN. 12 -1/2 GA. INTERMEDIATE
WIRES
D1it
III I:�
L =n.=1
HIGH - TENSILE STRENGTH, —
POLY BARRICADE FABRIC (TYPICAL)
GRADE
40
FRONT VIEW
MS
TREE PROTECTION AREA 16"
DO NOT ENTER
WARNING SIGN DETAIL
NOTE:
-USE SILT FENCE ONLY WHEN DRAINAGE AREA
DOES NOT EXCEED 1/4 ACRE AND NEVER IN
AREAS OF CONCENTRATED FLOW
-END OF SILT FENCE NEEDS TO BE TURNED UPHILL.
WARNING SIGNS TO BE MADE OF DURABLE, WEATHERPROOF MATERIAL
LETTERS TO BE 3" HIGH MINIMUM, CLEARLY LEGIBLE AND SPACED AS DETAILED.
SIGNS SHALL BE PLACED AT 50' MAXIMUM INTERVALS.
PLACE A SIGN AT EACH END OF LINEAR TREE PROTECTION AND 50' ON CENTER THEREAFTER.
FOR TREE PROTECTION AREAS LESS THAN 200' IN PERIMETER, PROVIDE NO LESS THAN ONE SIGN PER PROTECTION AREA.
ATTACH SIGNS SECURELY TO FENCE POSTS AND FABRIC.
MAINTAIN TREE PROTECTION FENCE THROUGHOUT DURATION OF PROJECT.
ADDITIONAL SIGNS MAY BE REQUIRED BY CITY OF RALEIGH INSPECTIONS DEPARTMENT BASED ON ACTUAL FIELD CONDITIONS.
PLACE A SIGN AT EACH END OF LINEAR TREE PROTECTION AND 50' ON CENTER THEREAFTER.
NOTE: FOR TREE PROTECTION ONLY
TREE PROTECTION FENCE DETAIL
NOT TO SCALE
2' EXISTING 2'
MIN. CHANNEL WIDTH MIN.
TOP OF
EXISTING
BANK
EXISTING
CHANNEL
BOTTOM
CHANNEL �/
PLUG � 1'
VARIES
CROSS - SECTION B -B'
5'
VARIES
SECTION A -A'
TOP OF
EXISTING
BANK —
EXISTING
CHANNEL
BOTTOM
TOP OF
EXISTING
BANK —
EXISTING
CHANNEL
BOTTOM
1'
EMPEMOUS CHANNEL PLUG DETAILS
NOT TO SCALE
WORKING
AREA
IMPERVIOUS SHEET
PROFILE VIEW
H"EMOUS DOE DETAIL
NOT TO SCALE
NOTES: TEMPORARY SPLASH PAD
(SEE DETAIL, LOCATE (AS
1. EXCAVATION SHALL BE PERFORMED IN ONLY DRY SECTIONS OF CHANNEL UNLESS DIRECTED AT THE TIME OF
DRAINAGE AREA EXCEEDS 6 SQUARE MILES. CONSTRUCTION)
2. IMPERVIOUS DIKES SHOULD BE USED TO ISOLATE WORK AREAS FROM STREAM FLOW.
3. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOT DISTURB MORE AREA THAN CAN BE
STABILIZED IN ONE WORKING DAY.
4. EACH PUMP AROUND PUMP SHOULD ADEQUATELY CONVEY BASE FLOW VOLUMES.
5. PUMP AROUND OPERATIONS SHOULD NOT BE UNDERTAKEN IF SIGNIFICANT RAINFALL IS
FORECAST IN THE CONSTRUCTIN PERIOD.
PLAN VIEW
CHANNEL PLUG NOTES:
1. CHANNEL PLUGS TO BE LOCATED AS SHOWN ON PLAN
SHEETS 6 THROUGH 8 AND AT OTHER LOCATIONS AS
DIRECTED BY THE CONSTRUCTION MANAGER.
2. CHANNEL PLUG MATERIAL SHALL BE OBTAINED FROM SELECT
IMPERVIOUS MATERIAL AND, IF SUITABLE, MATERIAL FROM
REMOVED ROCK CHECK DAMS.
3. SOIL SHALL BE COMPACTED TO 95% OF STANDARD PROCTOR.
PUMP AROUND PUMP
TYPICAL PUMP AROUND SETUP
NOT TO SCALE
LOG BUP'r^
11
STREAMB,
ATLEAS'
C
BOULDERS
�1:3'_P►f+��l
n
N
\c
PLAN VIEW
SPECIAL STILLING BASIN
(AS DIRECTED AT THE
TIME OF CONSTRUCTION)
LOG 1
BELO'
STRE,
DEWATERING PUMP
TEMPORARY I;_
FLEXIBLE o
HOSE
Z
10
EXISTING m
CHANNEL v
IMPERVIOUS DIKE
(LOCATE AS
DIRECTED AT
THE TIME OF
CONSTRUCTION)
TOP OF STREAMBANK
FLOW —
STREAMBED
TRANSPLANTS
� S�OpE
A0 X10
1I BURY END OF LOG 1
BELOW MAX POOL DEPTH
PROFILE VIEW
NOTES:
3URIED
N 1. LOGS SHOULD BE ATLEAST 12" IN DIAMETER.
AMBED RELATIVELY STRAIGHT, AND RECENTLY HARVESTED.
LOG VAIN
NOT TO SCALE
2. SOIL SHOULD BE COMPACTED WELL AROUND BURIED
PORTIONS OF THE LOG.
3. LOGS SHOULD BE HELD IN PLACE BY LARGE
BOULDERS BURIED IN THE BANK
4. TRANSPLANTS ARE PLACED ALONG THE TOP OF THE
BANK OVER THE BURIED LOG VAIN TO PREVENT EROSION
DURING HIGH FLOW EVENTS.
FOOTER BOULDER
PRELIMINARY DRAWING - NOT RELEASED FOR CONSTRUCTION
0 E
•
W w
Z °
U
W
E � o
U z z
Lm M
v, a
W a
q
mz 0.
a U E
.� p n p
W A c;
cj
Wpt
H a a 3,
O o W E-'
Z L)
o z aa>
�
; w pq =
LuA
W d
W o
z
c�
z
W
O
y
a a
E-
4
w
P4�
4WD
E-� a a z
A 0 a
E,
W zzL)
F
z wxo
� D
z
pq
E- x
d+
W �
r-
O �
a
z
O
z
U
z
U
''A Q
V�
Q a
U
PROJECT N0. DKU -8010
FILENAME: DKU8010 -D1
DESIGNED BY: AN G
DRAWN BY: AN G
SCALE: N. T. S.
DATE: 10-26-2012
SHEET N0.
D -2
IMPERVIOUS DIKE
SEQUENCE
OF CONSTRUCTION FOR TYPICAL PUMP AROUND
(LOCATE AS DIRECTED
AT THE TIME OF
1.
INSTALL SPECIAL STILLING BASINS AT THE DOWNSTREAM END OF THE DESIGNATED
CONSTRUCTION)
2.
PROJECT WORKING AREA.
THE CONTRACTOR WILL INSTALL THE PUMP AROUND PUMP AND THE THE TEMPORARY
3.
PIPING THAT WILL CONVEY THE BASE FLOW FROM UPSTREAM OF THE WORK SITE TO THE
4.
SPECIAL STILLLING BASIN.
INSTALL UPSTREAM IMPERVIOUS DIKE AND BEGIN PUMPING OPERATIONS FOR STREAM
DIVERSION.
5.
INSTALL THE DOWNSTREAM IMPERVIOUS DIKE AND PUMPING APPARATUS IF NEEDED TO
6.
DEWATER THE ENTRAPPED AREA. THE PUMP AND HOSE FOR THIS PURPOSE SHALL BE OF
TEMPORARY PIPING —
SUFFICIENT SIZE TO DEWATER THE WORK AREA. THIS WATER WILL ALSO FLOW INTO A
7.
SPECIAL STILLING BASIN.
THE CONTRACTOR WILL PERFORM STREAM RESTORATION WORK IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE
PLAN AND FOLLOWING THE GENERAL CONSTRUCTION SEQUENCE.
THE CONTRACTOR WILL EXCAVATE ANY ACCUMULATED SEDIMENT AND DEWATER BEFORE
REMOVAL OF THE IMPERVIOUS DIKE. REMOVE IMPERVIOUS DIKES, PUMPS, AND TEMPORARY
FLEXIBLE HOSE /PIPING STARTING WITH THE DOWNSTREAM DIKE FIRST.
ONCE THE WORKING AREA IS COMPLETED, REMOVE THE STILLING BASINS AND STABILIZE
DISTURBED AREAS TO SPECIFICATIONS AS SHOWN ON PLANS.
PLAN VIEW
CHANNEL PLUG NOTES:
1. CHANNEL PLUGS TO BE LOCATED AS SHOWN ON PLAN
SHEETS 6 THROUGH 8 AND AT OTHER LOCATIONS AS
DIRECTED BY THE CONSTRUCTION MANAGER.
2. CHANNEL PLUG MATERIAL SHALL BE OBTAINED FROM SELECT
IMPERVIOUS MATERIAL AND, IF SUITABLE, MATERIAL FROM
REMOVED ROCK CHECK DAMS.
3. SOIL SHALL BE COMPACTED TO 95% OF STANDARD PROCTOR.
PUMP AROUND PUMP
TYPICAL PUMP AROUND SETUP
NOT TO SCALE
LOG BUP'r^
11
STREAMB,
ATLEAS'
C
BOULDERS
�1:3'_P►f+��l
n
N
\c
PLAN VIEW
SPECIAL STILLING BASIN
(AS DIRECTED AT THE
TIME OF CONSTRUCTION)
LOG 1
BELO'
STRE,
DEWATERING PUMP
TEMPORARY I;_
FLEXIBLE o
HOSE
Z
10
EXISTING m
CHANNEL v
IMPERVIOUS DIKE
(LOCATE AS
DIRECTED AT
THE TIME OF
CONSTRUCTION)
TOP OF STREAMBANK
FLOW —
STREAMBED
TRANSPLANTS
� S�OpE
A0 X10
1I BURY END OF LOG 1
BELOW MAX POOL DEPTH
PROFILE VIEW
NOTES:
3URIED
N 1. LOGS SHOULD BE ATLEAST 12" IN DIAMETER.
AMBED RELATIVELY STRAIGHT, AND RECENTLY HARVESTED.
LOG VAIN
NOT TO SCALE
2. SOIL SHOULD BE COMPACTED WELL AROUND BURIED
PORTIONS OF THE LOG.
3. LOGS SHOULD BE HELD IN PLACE BY LARGE
BOULDERS BURIED IN THE BANK
4. TRANSPLANTS ARE PLACED ALONG THE TOP OF THE
BANK OVER THE BURIED LOG VAIN TO PREVENT EROSION
DURING HIGH FLOW EVENTS.
FOOTER BOULDER
PRELIMINARY DRAWING - NOT RELEASED FOR CONSTRUCTION
0 E
•
W w
Z °
U
W
E � o
U z z
Lm M
v, a
W a
q
mz 0.
a U E
.� p n p
W A c;
cj
Wpt
H a a 3,
O o W E-'
Z L)
o z aa>
�
; w pq =
LuA
W d
W o
z
c�
z
W
O
y
a a
E-
4
w
P4�
4WD
E-� a a z
A 0 a
E,
W zzL)
F
z wxo
� D
z
pq
E- x
d+
W �
r-
O �
a
z
O
z
U
z
U
''A Q
V�
Q a
U
PROJECT N0. DKU -8010
FILENAME: DKU8010 -D1
DESIGNED BY: AN G
DRAWN BY: AN G
SCALE: N. T. S.
DATE: 10-26-2012
SHEET N0.
D -2

NORTH
r —
. ..... .... ...........
. . ...........
�.....
�
..
,
-
=
�.....
/ -
\Xm
CENTRAL
WE
0
—�A — �f
V ::.
EXIS77NG
J
Lvol
EXIS77NG
LEGEND
TP
LD
PLANTING ZONE - PIEDMONT
BOTTOMLAND FOREST
CONSERVATION EASEMENT LIMITS
LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE
TREE PROTECTION
EXISTING 5' CONTOUR
EXISTING 1' CONTOUR
LIVE STAKES /WHIPS OR BRUSH CUTTINGS
HARDWOOD TREE
PINE TREE
TREE REMOVAL
LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE (WIDTH VARIES - REFER TO PLAN VIEW)
CHANNEL WIDTH / J
TOP OF BANK (BANKFULL WIDTH)
FLOODPLAIN —i r FLOODPLAIN
FLOODPLAIN
1
BANKFULL V STAGE r
TYPICAL BASEFLOW v
ELEVATION
T COIR MATTING
I'MCAL POOL
LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE (WIDTH VARIES - REFER TO PLAN VIEW)
CHANNEL WIDTH /
BANKFULL V STAGE
3' TYPICAL BV OW
ELEVATION ION V
COIR MATTING
1YPICAL RIFFLE
FLOODPLAIN
�— EXISTING
BARE ROOT
SEEDLINGS
J
J
TIE TO
EXISTING
9
9
GRAPHIC SCALE
50 0 25 50 100
1 inch = 50 ft.
PRELIMINARY DRAWING — NOT RELEASED FOR CONSrIRUCTION
0) E
•
W w
.� �
U
RDA
E c o
U z z
�z
0 En 0
W � A "•
H P4 7,
O 0 W E
z
o z
:� d = uo
m
:� ■ W C,2 Cm
W d
W o
U'
z
W
[n
O
y
G� a
E
zA
z
d a z
Z -!4
z�z
�W x
W [/] �
W O
Q 0 -4
a
0-4 ,--1
z
0
a
z
O
c� o
F-1 z
O
z
a
a
� U
�D O
rim)
Qa
PROJECT N0. DKU -8010
FILENAME: DKU8010 —LS1
DESIGNED BY: GH B
DRAWN BY: ANG /GHB
SCALE: 1 " -50'
DATE: 10-26-2012
SHEET N0.
LS -1
E���

GENERAL NOTES
1. ALL RIPARIAN BUFFER AREAS WITHIN THE LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE TO BE SEEDED TO SPECIFICATIONS
UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.
2. ALL AREAS OUTSIDE OF THE LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE TO REMAIN IN THEIR NATURAL CONDITION, UNLESS
OTHERWISE NOTED FOR REMOVAL DUE TO INVASIVE SPECIES.
3. CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY ALL DIMENSIONS IN FIELD. ANY DISCREPANCIES SHALL BE REPORTED TO THE
OWNER AND DESIGNER, PRIOR TO PROCEEDING WITH THE WORK.
4. THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR HAVING ALL UTILITIES LOCATED 48 HOURS PRIOR TO MOBILIZATION
TO THE SITE. "CALL BEFORE YOU DIG." TOLL FREE NUMBER (800- 698 - 4949).
5. CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY LOCATIONS AND ELEVATIONS OF ALL EXISTING UTILITIES (IF ANY).
PLANING NOTES
1. THE PLANTING STOCK SHALL BE GROWN WITHIN THE PIEDMONT REGION BY NURSERIES WITHIN 200 MILES
OF THE PROJECT SITE. THE SEED SOURCES FOR THE PLANT MATERIAL SHALL ALSO BE FROM THE PIEDMONT
REGION AND SHALL BE OBTAINED WITHIN 200 MILES OF THE PROJECT SITE. PLANT STOCK AND SEED MIXES
MAY BE USED FROM NURSERIES BEYOND THE 200 MILE LIMIT WITH THE APPROVAL OF THE DESIGNER.
2. THE CONTRACTOR I.E. PLANTING SUPERVISOR INSTALLING THE VEGETATION SHALL HAVE ONE OF THE
FOLLOWING QUALIFICATIONS / CERTIFICATIONS: CERTIFIED LANDSCAPE TECHNICIAN, CERTIFIED PLANT
PROFESSIONAL, REGISTERED FORESTER, REGISTERED LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR, OR CERTIFIED NURSERYMEN.
3. THE CONTRACTOR (I.E. PLANTING SUPERVISOR) WILL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR MANAGING ALL ACTIVITIES
INVOLVING PERMANENT PLANTING, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO THE FOLLOWING: SITE PREPARATION FOR
PLANTING, EXOTIC PLANT REMOVAL (WHERE SPECIFIED), SEEDLING HANDLING AND STORAGE, PLANTING
OPERATIONS, QUALITY CONTROL INSPECTIONS, AND MANAGING PLANT COMPETITION.
4. THE PLANTING PERIOD FOR THIS PROJECT SHALL OCCUR IN THE FALL OR WINTER (IF THE GROUND IS NOT
FROZEN). PLEASE NOTE PLANTING SHALL NOT TAKE PLACE IF ANY OF THE FOLLOWING OCCUR: (1) THE
TEMPERATURE IS BELOW 32 -F, (2) THE SOIL TO BE EXCAVATED FOR THE PLANT HOLE IS FROZEN, OR (3)
THE SOIL TO BE USED FOR BACKFILLING IS FROZEN OR TOO WET.
5. FOR ALL PLANTED MATERIAL (BARE ROOT / CONTAINERIZED SEEDLINGS, LIVE STAKES, AND PERMANENT
SEEDING) THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR MAINTAINING (I.E. A WARRANTY) AN 80% SURVIVAL
RATE FOR THE DURATION OF THE FIRST YEAR MONITORING PERIOD. ANY COSTS ASSOCIATED WITH REPLACING
PERMANENT PLANTINGS THAT DO NOT SURVIVE THE FIRST YEAR SHALL BE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE
CONTRACTOR. PLEASE NOTE THE ONE -YEAR MONITORING PERIOD BEGINS UPON ACCEPTANCE OF THE
PERMANENT PLANTINGS BY THE DESIGNER. AT THE END OF THE FIRST YEAR MONITORING PERIOD, AN
ON -SITE INSPECTION WILL BE CONDUCTED BETWEEN THE CONTRACTOR AND DESIGNER. AT THAT TIME, THE
CONTRACTOR WILL BE DIRECTED ACCORDINGLY ON REPLACEMENT OF ANY NECESSARY PLANTINGS.
6. THE ONE -YEAR WARRANTY SHALL INCLUDE MORTALITY AND POOR GROWTH DEFECTS, BUT SHALL NOT
INCLUDE DEFECTS RESULTING FROM ABUSE BY OTHER PARTIES AND ABNORMAL WEATHER CONDITIONS.
PLEASE NOTE THE 80% SURVIVAL RATE IS A MINIMUM STANDARD AND THE CONTRACTOR MAY PROVIDE
ADDITIONAL MEASURES THEY DETERMINE WILL BE BENEFICIAL TO PLANT SURVIVABILITY. ANY ADDITIONAL
MEASURES WILL BE CONSIDERED PART OF THE 80% SURVIVAL CLAUSE AND WILL NOT CONSTITUTE A
CHANGE ORDER. THIS MAY INCLUDE, BUT IS NOT LIMITED TO, SOIL AMENDMENTS, IRRIGATION, AND MULCH.
7. IN ORDER TO ELIMINATE COMPETITION WITHIN THE BUFFER RESTORATION AREAS, THE EXISTING VEGETATION
MAY BE SPRAYED WITH AN AQUATIC HERBICIDE. THE PARTY APPLYING THE HERBICIDE SHALL BE PROPERLY
LICENSED IN THE STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA. PLEASE REFER TO "INVASIVE SPECIES CONTROL" FOR
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION.
B. AT THE CONTRACTOR'S DISCRETION, THE PROPAGATION METHOD LISTED FOR EACH PLANT MAY BE ALTERED
IF IT IS LIKELY TO IMPROVE SURVIVABILITY. THIS WILL BE SOLELY AT THE CONTRACTOR'S DISCRETION AND
WILL THEREFORE NOT BE CONSIDERED A CHANGE ORDER. ALSO, NO CHANGE IN THE PLANTING DENSITY
WILL BE GIVEN.
9. THE CORRECT SPACING OF VEGETATION WITHIN THE PLANTING ZONE SHOULD BE CHECKED BY THE PLANTING
SUPERVISOR ON A REGULAR BASIS.
PLANT DISTRIBUTTION NOTES
1. PLANT SPACING SHALL BE BASED ON A 8' X 8' GRID. THIS SPACING REFERS TO PLANTING THE PLANTS EACH
8 FEET APART FROM EACH OTHER IN ALL DIRECTIONS. THIS SPACING DOES NOT RELATE TO PLANTING
DISTANCE AT THE ZONE BOUNDARY.
2. PLANT SPACING SHALL TAKE INTO ACCOUNT EXISTING TREES WITHIN THE RIPARIAN BUFFER.
3. PLANT DISTRIBUTION SHALL BE RANDOM AND IS DEFINED AS FOLLOWS: RANDOM DISTRIBUTION - TAKE ALL
PLANTS AND MIX THE PLANTS SO THAT THEY ARE ALL PLANTED RANDOMLY. IF DONE PROPERLY, SOMETIMES
TWO OR MORE OF THE SAME SPECIES WILL BE PLANTED ADJACENT TO EACH OTHER AND OTHER TIMES
THERE MAY ONLY BE ONE PLANT OF A SPECIES COMPLETELY SURROUNDED BY ONE OR MORE OTHER
SPECIES. THE PLANTING CONTRACTOR SHALL ALSO RANDOMLY DISTRIBUTE CONTAINERIZED AND BARE ROOT /
TUBLING PLANTINGS. IN GENERAL, 50% OF EACH PLANTING ZONE (7 TOTAL) SHALL BE CONTAINERIZED
PLANTINGS AND 50% SHALL BE BARE ROOT / TUBLING PLANTINGS.
4. THE FIRST PLANTING ROW SHOULD BEGIN 1% OF THE PLANTING DISTANCE IN FROM THE OUTER EDGE OF THE
PLANTING ZONE. THE ENTIRE ZONE SHALL BE PLANTED FULLY AT THE DESIGNATED SPACING. THE
PLANTING ZONE IS TO BE PLANTED TO WITHIN 1% THE DESIGNATED PLANT SPACING DISTANCE FROM ANY
EDGE OF THE ZONE. IN ALL CASES, PLANTS SHALL BE PLANTED UNTIL PLANTS ARE PLACED TO WITHIN A
MAXIMUM OF 3/4 OF THE PLANT SPACING DISTANCE FROM THE EDGE OF THE PLANTING ZONE.
5. THE CORRECT SPACING OF VEGETATION WITHIN THE PLANTING ZONE SHOULD BE CHECKED BY THE PLANTING
SUPERVISOR ON A REGULAR BASIS DURING PLANTING. DOCUMENTATION OF EACH INSPECTION SHALL BE KEPT BY
THE SUPERVISOR AND SHALL BE MADE AVAILABLE FOR INSPECTION UPON REQUEST. PLEASE NOTE ANY COSTS
ASSOCIATED WITH CHECKING THE PLANT SPACING / DOCUMENTATION ARE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR.
6. THERE SHALL NOT BE ANY BARE ROOT SEEDLINGS PLANTED WITHIN COIR MATTING.
SPECIES SELECTION
1. THE PERMANENT PLANTING SPECIES SELECTION SHALL BE BASED ON THE "TREE" AND /OR "SMALL
TREE /SHRUB" SPECIES LISTED WITHIN THE PLANTING ZONE TABLE ON SHEET LS -1. PLANT SUBSTITUTES
WILL NOT BE CONSIDERED FOR THIS PROJECT AS FLEXIBILITY HAS BEEN INCLUDED BELOW IN NOTES #3
AND #4.
2. THE PERMANENT PLANTINGS WILL BE PLANTED IN THE DESIGNATED PLANTING ZONES ONLY (SEE HATCHED
AREAS ON SHEET LS -1). PLEASE NOTE IT IS THE CONTRACTORS RESPONSIBILITY TO ENSURE THAT AN
ADEQUATE NUMBER OF PLANTINGS ARE AVAILABLE DURING THE SPECIFIED PLANTING PERIOD.
3. PRIOR TO PLANTING, A WRITTEN LIST (SIGNED BY THE PLANTING SUPERVISOR) OF THE ACTUAL SPECIES
PURCHASED FROM THE NURSERY (AND IN WHAT PERCENTAGES OF THE TOTAL) MUST BE DELIVERED TO THE
DESIGNER FOR REVIEW AND APPROVAL.
4. THE PLANTING ZONES SHALL BE PLANTED WITH AT LEAST SIX OF THE LISTED SPECIES AS DEPICTED ON THE
PLANTING ZONE TABLE LISTED ON THIS SHEET. NO MORE THAN 20% OF ANY ONE SPECIES SHALL MAKE UP
EACH PLANTING ZONE. NO SPECIES SHALL MAKE UP LESS THAN 10% OF THE EACH PLANTING ZONE.
5. THE PLANTING SUPERVISOR SHALL ENSURE THAT THE MINIMUM PLANTING DENSITY OF 436 TO 681 INDIVIDUAL
TREE SPECIES PER ACRE IS MET WITHIN EACH PLANTING ZONE.
6. PRIOR TO SEEDING /APPLICATION, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE THE DESIGNER WITH SEED MIX
INFORMATION, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO: GERMINATION RATES, NOXIOUS WEED SEEDS, AND DATE /
LOCATION OF HARVEST. THIS INFORMATION MUST BE REVIEWED / APPROVED BY THE DESIGNER.
7. AFTER PLANTING, A WRITTEN LIST (SIGNED BY THE PLANTING SUPERVISOR) OF THE ACTUAL SPECIES
INSTALLED (AND IN WHAT PERCENTAGES OF THE TOTAL) MUST BE DELIVERED TO THE DESIGNER FOR REVIEW
BEFORE FINAL APPROVAL (I.E. - START OF THE ONE -YEAR MONITORING PERIOD) OF THE PLANTING WILL BE
ISSUED.
GRADING AND SOIL PREPARATION NOTES
1. THE TOPSOIL MUST BE STOCKPILED.
2. ANY AREAS ON THE SITE THAT ARE COMPACTED DURING THE CONSTRUCTION PROCESS, MUST BE DEEP
TILLED TO ENSURE THAT THE ROOT GROWTH OF THE PLANTS WILL NOT BE IMPEDED BY COMPACTED SOIL.
THIS DOES NOT INCLUDE ANY AREAS THAT ARE PURPOSEFULLY COMPACTED IN THE SUBSOIL TO PREVENT
THE DOWNWARD MOVEMENT OF WATER.
3. ALL TOPSOIL SHALL BE STOCKPILED SEPARATELY FROM ANY SUBSOIL MATERIAL.
4. ANY AREA THAT HAS FILL APPLIED TO IT OR ANY AREA EXCAVATED TO THE SUBSOIL MUST BE TOP
DRESSED WITH AT LEAST 4 INCHES OF STOCKPILED TOPSOIL. BEFORE THE APPLICATION OF TOPSOIL, THE
SURFACE MUST BE TILLED TO ENSURE GOOD INTERACTION BETWEEN THE TOPSOIL AND THE SUBSOIL.
5. UPON COMPLETION OF FINAL GRADING, THE PLANTING SUPERVISOR SHALL CONDUCT A SITE ASSESSMENT TO
DETERMINE IF THE SOIL IS APPROPRIATELY PREPARED FOR PLANTING. IF ANY PROBLEMS EXIST, THEY SHALL
BE NOTED AND CORRECTED BEFORE PLANTING MAY COMMENCE.
CONSTRUCTION METHODS
BARE ROOT / CONTAINERIZED SEEDLINGS
1. THE STORAGE, HANDLING, AND PLANTING OF BARE ROOT / CONTAINERIZED SEEDLINGS WILL FOLLOW THE
PROCEDURES OUTLINED IN THE NC DIVISION OF FOREST RESOURCES (NCFS) "POCKET GUIDE TO SEEDLING
CARE AND PLANTING STANDARDS ", 6th EDITION. JANUARY 2007. ONLY THE HIGHEST QUALITY BARE ROOT
/ CONTAINERIZED SEEDLINGS SHALL BE PLANTED. THE PLANTED SEEDLINGS SHALL HAVE WELL - DEVELOPED
FIBROUS ROOT SYSTEMS AND HEALTHY BUDS.
2. ALL BARE ROOT / CONTAINERIZED SEEDLINGS SHALL BE DORMANT AT TIME OF ACQUISITION AND PLANTING.
3. ALL BARE ROOT / CONTAINERIZED SPECIES SHALL HAVE A MINIMUM OF FOUR (4) FIRST ORDER LATERAL
ROOTS (FOLR) THAT EXCEED 1 MM IN DIAMETER. SEEDLINGS THAT DO NOT POSSESS THE MINIMUM NUMBER
OF FOLR SHALL BE CULLED FROM PLANTING. BARE ROOT / CONTAINERIZED TREE SPECIES SEEDLINGS
THAT WILL FORM THE CANOPY MUST HAVE A MINIMUM ROOT COLLAR DIAMETER (RCD) OF 3/8 INCH.
SEEDLINGS WITH LESSER RCD'S CULLED FROM PLANTING.
4. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PAY CLOSE ATTENTION TO THE HANDLING OF THE PLANT MATERIAL DURING
CONSTRUCTION TO PREVENT INJURY TO OR DRYING OUT OF THE TRUNK, BRANCHES, OR ROOTS. FREEZING
OF THE PLANT ROOTS SHALL ALSO BE PREVENTED.
5. UNLESS THEY ARE PROMPTLY PLANTED IMMEDIATELY FOLLOWING DELIVERY TO THE PROJECT SITE, ALL
PLANTS WITH BARE ROOTS SHALL BE HEELED -IN CONSTANTLY WITHIN MOIST SOIL OR SAWDUST (IN A
MANNER CONSISTENT WITH GENERALLY ACCEPTED HORTICULTURAL PRACTICES).
6. IF THE PLANTING AREA IS LOCATED ON COMPACTED SOIL, THE SOIL IN THIS AREA SHALL BE LOOSENED TO
A MINIMUM DEPTH OF 1 -FOOT. SEEDLINGS MAY BE PLANTED IN HOLES MADE BY A MATTOCK, DIBBLE,
PLANTING BAR, OR OTHER PROVIDED THE MEANS ARE APPROVED BY THE DESIGNER. ROOT STOCK SHALL
BE PLANTED IN A VERTICAL POSITION WITH THE ROOT COLLAR LOCATED APPROXIMATELY 0.5- INCHES
BELOW THE SOIL SURFACE. THE PLANTING TRENCH OR HOLE SHALL BE WIDE ENOUGH TO ALLOW ROOTS
TO SPREAD OUT AND DOWN WITHOUT J- ROOTING. AFTER PLANTING, THE SOIL AROUND THE SHRUB OR
TREE SHALL BE TAMPED FIRMLY TO REMOVE POTENTIAL AIR POCKETS.
7. TO PROMOTE PROPER GROWTH, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL DEEPLY TILL AND SCARIFY THE PLANTING ZONES
TO ENSURE THAT THE ROOT GROWTH OF THE PLANTS WILL NOT BE IMPEDED BY COMPACTED SOIL. ANY
SUB - SURFACE HARDPANS WITHIN THE PLANTING ZONE SHALL BE ELIMINATED. RIPPING, DISKING, OR
RAKING SHALL BE PERFORMED IN ALL AREAS TO BE SEEDED TO A MINIMUM DEPTH OF 3 INCHES TO 4
INCHES.
B. STRAW MULCH SHALL BE PLACED: (1) AROUND THE BASE OF EACH SEEDLING /PLANT IN A MINIMUM 4" TO
6" LAYER AND (2) OVER ALL SEEDED AREAS.
9. IN SEEDED AREAS, TO LIMIT EROSION POTENTIAL, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL LIMIT SUB -GRADE AND FINISH
GRADE PREPARATION TO AREAS THAT WILL BE PLANTED IMMEDIATELY. PREPARED AREAS SHALL BE
MOISTENED PRIOR TO SEEDING WHEN THE SOIL IS DRY, BUT CARE SHALL BE TAKEN TO NOT CREATE
MUDDY CONDITIONS.
10. THE PLANTING ZONE SHALL NOT BE GRADED LEVEL. MICROTOPOGRAPHY IS DESIRED TO PROMOTE DIFFUSE
FLOW AND SURFACE WATER STORAGE. MICROTOPOGRAPHICAL DEPRESSIONS SHALL NOT BE GREATER THAN
6 INCHES IN DEPTH.
11. UPON COMPLETION OF FINAL GRADING, THE PLANTING SUPERVISOR SHALL CONDUCT A SITE ASSESSMENT
TO DETERMINE IF THE SOIL IS APPROPRIATELY PREPARED FOR PLANTING. IF ANY PROBLEMS EXIST, THEY
SHALL BE NOTED AND CORRECTED BEFORE PLANTING MAY COMMENCE.
LIVE STAKES
1. AREAS NOTED AS LIVE STAKES WITHIN THE PLANTING ZONE SHALL BE PLANTED WITH SILKY DOGWOOD
(CORNUS AMOMUM), SILKY WILLOW (SALIX SERICEA), AND BLACK WILLOW (SALIX NIGRA).
2. ONE LIVE STAKE SPECIES PER LIVE STAKE AREA. ALTERNATE SPECIES PER LIVE STAKE AREA.
3. ALL LIVE STAKES SHALL BE DORMANT AT TIME OF ACQUISITION AND PLANTING.
4. LIVE STAKES SHALL BE 1/2 -2" (12 -50 MM) IN DIAMETER. LIVE STAKES SHALL ALSO BE 2 - 4 FEET (0.6
- 1 METER) IN LENGTH.
5. DURING PREPARATION, THE BASAL ENDS OF THE LIVE STAKES SHALL BE CLEANLY CUT AT AN ANGLE TO
FACILITATE EASY INSERTION INTO THE SOIL, WHILE THE TOPS SHALL BE CUT SQUARE OR BLUNT FOR
TAMPING. ALL LIMBS SHALL BE REMOVED FROM THE SIDES OF THE LIVE CUTTING PRIOR TO INSTALLATION.
6. CUTTINGS FOR LIVE STAKES SHALL BE HARVESTED IN A MANNER SUCH THAT THEY ARE CUT, IMMEDIATELY
PUT INTO WATER TO BE SOAKED FOR TEN DAYS, AND THEN PLANTED IMMEDIATELY AFTER THE TEN DAYS
ARE COMPLETED. CUTTINGS SHALL REMAIN WET UNTIL THEY ARE PLANTED. OUTSIDE STORAGE LOCATIONS
SHOULD BE CONTINUALLY SHADED AND PROTECTED FROM WIND AND DIRECT SUNLIGHT.
7. LIVE STAKES SHALL BE TAMPED AT AN ANGLE INTO THE GROUND SURFACE WITH A DEAD BLOW HAMMER,
WITH BUDS ORIENTED IN AN UPWARD DIRECTION. STAKES SHOULD BE TAMPED UNTIL APPROXIMATELY 3/4
OF THE STAKE LENGTH IS WITHIN THE GROUND. ANY STAKES THAT ARE SPLIT OR DAMAGED DURING
INSTALLATION SHALL BE REMOVED AND REPLACED.
8. THE AREA AROUND EACH LIVE STAKE SHALL BE COMPACTED BY FOOT AFTER THE LIVE STAKE HAS BEEN
INSTALLED.
9. ONE TO TWO INCHES SHALL BE CUT CLEANLY OFF OF THE TOP OF EACH LIVE STAKE (WITH LOPPERS) AT
AN ANGLE OF APPROXIMATELY 15 DEGREES FOLLOWING INSTALLATION.
SEQUENCE OF PLANTIINiG EVENTS
THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR THE FOLLOWING GENERAL SEQUENCE OF CONSTRUCTION:
1. SET UP STAGING AREAS AND ACCESS ROADS. INSTALL CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCES, SILT FENCE, AND SILT
FENCE OUTLETS (AS REQUIRED). SEE EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL DETAILS FOR ADDITIONAL
INSTRUCTIONS.
2. CONTRACTOR TO STOCKPILE AND STAGE MATERIALS ONLY AT THE LOCATIONS SHOWN ON THE PLANS
UNLESS OTHERWISE APPROVED BY THE DESIGNER. NO WASTE STOCKPILING IS ALLOWED. ALL WASTE
MATERIALS MUST BE REMOVED FROM THE FLOODPLAIN AND THE PROJECT SITE.
3. REMOVE INVASIVE SPECIES WHERE PRESENT. STOCKPILE BAGGED INVASIVE SPECIES AND HAUL OFF -SITE
(SEE INVASIVE SPECIES CONTROL THIS SHEET).
4. PREPARE PLANTING AREAS AS NEEDED. APPLY TEMPORARY OR PERMANENT SEED. SEE PLANTING NOTES
AND SEEDING NOTES THIS SHEET FOR ADDITIONAL INSTRUCTIONS.
5. PLANT SITE ACCORDING TO THE PLANTING SPECIFICATIONS.
6. IN SEEDED AREAS, TO LIMIT EROSION POTENTIAL, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL LIMIT SUB -GRADE AND FINISH
GRADE PREPARATION TO AREAS THAT WILL BE PLANTED IMMEDIATELY. PREPARED AREAS SHALL BE
MOISTENED PRIOR TO SEEDING WHEN THE SOIL IS DRY, BUT CARE SHALL BE TAKEN TO NOT CREATE
MUDDY CONDITIONS.
7. COMPLETE ALL FINAL SITE WORK NECESSARY TO COMPLETE THE PROJECT.
TEMPORARY SEEDING
TEMPORARY SEEDING SHALL BE APPLIED AS NEEDED DURING
CONSTRUCTION TO STABILIZE BARE OR DISTURBED AREAS OF SOIL AND
AT THE COMPLETION OR ALL GRADING AND EARTHWORK ACTIVITIES
WITHIN A PARTICULAR AREA OF THE SITE. PERMANENT SEED MAY BE
DISTRIBUTED WITH TEMPORARY SEED UPON THE FINAL APPLICATION OF
TEMPORARY SEED.
SEEDBED PREPARATION
APPLY LIME ACCORDING TO SOIL TEST RECOMMENDATIONS. SOILS WITH A
PH OF 6 OR HIGHER NEED NOT BE LIMED. IF RECENT TILLAGE
OPERATIONS HAVE RESULTED IN A LOOSE SURFACE, ADDITIONAL
ROUGHENING MAY NOT BE REQUIRED EXCEPT TO BREAK UP LARGE
CLODS. IF RAINFALL CAUSES THE SURFACE TO BECOME SEALED OR
CRUSTED, LOOSEN IT JUST PRIOR TO SEEDING BY DISKING, RAKING,
HARROWING, OR OTHER SUITABLE METHODS.
SEEDING METHODS
1. EVENLY APPLY SEED USING A CYCLONE SEEDER, DRILL, CULTIPACKER
SEEDER, OR HYDROSEEDER. THIS MUST BE DONE WITHIN 48 HOURS OF
LAND DISTURBING ACTIVITIES.
2. MULCH WITH CLEAN WHEAT STRAW.
3. AFTER SEEDING, APPLY MULCH TO AREAS UNDER HARSH CONDITIONS
SUCH AS AREAS THAT HAVE BEEN GRADED OR THOSE WHICH WILL
RECEIVE CONCENTRATED FLOWS. AREAS CONSIDERED TO BE UNDER
HARSH CONDITIONS WILL BE CONSIDERED THE AREAS GRADED FOR
THE WETLAND VALLEY.
4. RESEED AND MULCH AREAS WHERE SEEDLING EMERGENCE IS LESS
THAN 80% COVERAGE, OR WHERE EROSION OCCURS, AS SOON AS
POSSIBLE. DO NOT MOW. PROTECT FROM TRAFFIC AS MUCH AS
POSSIBLE.
MAINTENANCE PLAN
1. ALL EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PRACTICES WILL BE CHECKED
FOR STABILITY AND OPERATION FOLLOWING EVERY RUNOFF - PRODUCING
RAINFALL BUT IN NO CASE LESS THAN ONCE EVERY WEEK. ANY
NEEDED REPAIRS WILL BE MADE IMMEDIATELY TO MAINTAIN ALL
PRACTICES AS DESIGNED.
2. SEDIMENT WILL BE REMOVED FROM BEHIND THE SEDIMENT FENCES
WHEN IT BECOMES APPROXIMATELY SIX (6) INCHES DEEP AT THE
FENCE. THE SEDIMENT FENCE WILL BE REPAIRED AS NECESSARY TO
MAINTAIN A BARRIER. ALL SEEDED AREAS WILL BE FERTILIZED,
RESEEDED AS NECESSARY, AND MULCHED ACCORDING TO
SPECIFICATIONS IN THE VEGETATIVE PLAN. BECAUSE THE GOAL OF
THE RESTORATION IS TO ESTABLISH A SELF MAINTAINING VEGETATED
CORRIDOR, MAINTENANCE SHOULD BE MINIMAL.
TEMPORARY EROSION CONTROL SEEDING
PLANTING ZONE
PIEDMONT BOTTOMLAND FOREST
SEEDING DATES
ECOREGION
SPECIES
SPECIES
COMMON NAME
SOIL AMENDMENTS
GROWTH HABIT
PROPAGATION METHOD
SPACING
FRAXINUS PENNSYLVANICA
GREEN ASH
SECALE CEREALE
TRIFOLIUM INCARNATUM
TREE
BARE
ROOT / CONTAINERIZED
8
X 8
PLATANUS OCCIDENTALIS
SYCAMORE
SECALE CEREALE
TRIFOLIUM INCARNATUM
TREE
BARE
ROOT / CONTAINERIZED
8
X 8
QUERCUS PAGODA
CHERRYBARK OAK
TREE
BARE
ROOT / CONTAINERIZED
8
X 8
BETULA NIGRA
RIVER BIRCH
TREE
BARE
ROOT / CONTAINERIZED
8
X 8
QUERCUS NIGRA
WATER OAK
TREE
BARE
ROOT / CONTAINERIZED
8
X 8
QUERCUS LYRATA
OVERCUP OAK
TREE
BARE
ROOT / CONTAINERIZED
8
X 8
QUERCUS MICHAUXII
SWAMP CHESTNUT OAK
TREE
BARE
ROOT / CONTAINERIZED
8
X 8
QUERCUS PHELLOS
WILLOW OAK
TREE
BARE
ROOT / CONTAINERIZED
8
X 8
QUERCUS LAURIFOLIA
LAUREL OAK
TREE
BARE
ROOT / CONTAINERIZED
8
X 8
QUERCUS ALBA
WHITE OAK
TREE
BARE
ROOT / CONTAINERIZED
8
X 8
QUERCUS FALCATA
SOUTHERN RED OAK
TREE
BARE
ROOT / CONTAINERIZED
8
X 8
ACER BARBATUM
SOUHTERN SUGAR MAPLE
TREE
BARE
ROOT / CONTAINERIZED
8
X 8
ULMUS AMERICANA
AMERICAN ELM
TREE
BARE
ROOT / CONTAINERIZED
8
X 8
LIRIODENDRON TULIPIFERA
TULIP POPLAR
TREE
BARE
ROOT CONTAINERIZED
8
X 8
FAGUS GRANDIFOLIA
AMERICAN BEECH
TREE
BARE
ROOT / CONTAINERIZED
8
X 8
CORNUS FLORIDA
FLOWERING DOGWOOD
SMALL TREE SHRUB
BARE
ROOT / CONTAINERIZED
8
X 8
ALNUS SERRULATA
TAG ALDER
SMALL TREE /SHRUB
BARE
ROOT / CONTAINERIZED
8
X 8
ASIMINA TRILOBA
PAWPAW
SMALL TREE SHRUB
BARE
ROOT / CONTAINERIZED
8
X 8
MYRICA CERIFERA
WAX MYRTLE
SMALL TREE /SHRUB
BARE
ROOT / CONTAINERIZED
8
X 8
CARPINUS CAROLINIANA
IRONWOOD
SMALL TREE /SHRUB
BARE
ROOT / CONTAINERIZED
8
X 8
MAGNOLIA VIRGINIANA
SWEET BAY
SMALL TREE /SHRUB
BARE
ROOT / CONTAINERIZED
8
X 8
ARONIA ARBUTIFOLIA
RED CHOKEBERRY
SMALL TREE /SHRUB
BARE
ROOT / CONTAINERIZED
8
X 8
ILEX VERTICILLATA
WINTERBERRY
SMALL TREE /SHRUB
BARE
ROOT / CONTAINERIZED
8
X 8
CEPHALANTHUS OCCIDENTALIS
BUTTONBUSH
SMALL TREE /SHRUB
BARE
ROOT / CONTAINERIZED
8
X 8
LINDERA BENZOIN
SPICEBUSH
SMALL TREE /SHRUB
BARE
ROOT / CONTAINERIZED
8
X 8
LEUCOTHOE RACEMOSA
FETTERBUSH
SMALL TREE /SHRUB
BARE
ROOT / CONTAINERIZED
8
X 8
AESCULUS SYLVATICA
PAINTED BUCKEYE
SMALL TREE /SHRUB
BARE
ROOT / CONTAINERIZED
8
X 8
ILEX OPACA
AMERICAN HOLLY
SMALL TREE /SHRUB
BARE
ROOT / CONTAINERIZED
8
X 8
TEMPORARY SEEDING
TEMPORARY SEEDING SHALL BE APPLIED AS NEEDED DURING
CONSTRUCTION TO STABILIZE BARE OR DISTURBED AREAS OF SOIL AND
AT THE COMPLETION OR ALL GRADING AND EARTHWORK ACTIVITIES
WITHIN A PARTICULAR AREA OF THE SITE. PERMANENT SEED MAY BE
DISTRIBUTED WITH TEMPORARY SEED UPON THE FINAL APPLICATION OF
TEMPORARY SEED.
SEEDBED PREPARATION
APPLY LIME ACCORDING TO SOIL TEST RECOMMENDATIONS. SOILS WITH A
PH OF 6 OR HIGHER NEED NOT BE LIMED. IF RECENT TILLAGE
OPERATIONS HAVE RESULTED IN A LOOSE SURFACE, ADDITIONAL
ROUGHENING MAY NOT BE REQUIRED EXCEPT TO BREAK UP LARGE
CLODS. IF RAINFALL CAUSES THE SURFACE TO BECOME SEALED OR
CRUSTED, LOOSEN IT JUST PRIOR TO SEEDING BY DISKING, RAKING,
HARROWING, OR OTHER SUITABLE METHODS.
SEEDING METHODS
1. EVENLY APPLY SEED USING A CYCLONE SEEDER, DRILL, CULTIPACKER
SEEDER, OR HYDROSEEDER. THIS MUST BE DONE WITHIN 48 HOURS OF
LAND DISTURBING ACTIVITIES.
2. MULCH WITH CLEAN WHEAT STRAW.
3. AFTER SEEDING, APPLY MULCH TO AREAS UNDER HARSH CONDITIONS
SUCH AS AREAS THAT HAVE BEEN GRADED OR THOSE WHICH WILL
RECEIVE CONCENTRATED FLOWS. AREAS CONSIDERED TO BE UNDER
HARSH CONDITIONS WILL BE CONSIDERED THE AREAS GRADED FOR
THE WETLAND VALLEY.
4. RESEED AND MULCH AREAS WHERE SEEDLING EMERGENCE IS LESS
THAN 80% COVERAGE, OR WHERE EROSION OCCURS, AS SOON AS
POSSIBLE. DO NOT MOW. PROTECT FROM TRAFFIC AS MUCH AS
POSSIBLE.
MAINTENANCE PLAN
1. ALL EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PRACTICES WILL BE CHECKED
FOR STABILITY AND OPERATION FOLLOWING EVERY RUNOFF - PRODUCING
RAINFALL BUT IN NO CASE LESS THAN ONCE EVERY WEEK. ANY
NEEDED REPAIRS WILL BE MADE IMMEDIATELY TO MAINTAIN ALL
PRACTICES AS DESIGNED.
2. SEDIMENT WILL BE REMOVED FROM BEHIND THE SEDIMENT FENCES
WHEN IT BECOMES APPROXIMATELY SIX (6) INCHES DEEP AT THE
FENCE. THE SEDIMENT FENCE WILL BE REPAIRED AS NECESSARY TO
MAINTAIN A BARRIER. ALL SEEDED AREAS WILL BE FERTILIZED,
RESEEDED AS NECESSARY, AND MULCHED ACCORDING TO
SPECIFICATIONS IN THE VEGETATIVE PLAN. BECAUSE THE GOAL OF
THE RESTORATION IS TO ESTABLISH A SELF MAINTAINING VEGETATED
CORRIDOR, MAINTENANCE SHOULD BE MINIMAL.
TEMPORARY EROSION CONTROL SEEDING
SEASON
SEEDING DATES
ECOREGION
SPECIES
SCIENTIFIC NAME
RATE (LB /ACRE)
SOIL AMENDMENTS
MAINTENANCE
FALL
AUGUST 15 - JANUARY 1
PIEDMONT
RYE GRAIN
CRIMSON CLOVER
SECALE CEREALE
TRIFOLIUM INCARNATUM
120
FOLLOW SOIL TESTS
FOR LIME
SEE TEMPORARY
SEEDING
MAINTENANCE PLAN
LATE WINTER AND EARLY
SPRING
JANUARY 1 - MAY 1
PIEDMONT
RYE GRAIN
CRIMSON CLOVER
SECALE CEREALE
TRIFOLIUM INCARNATUM
120
SUMMER
MAY 1 - AUGUST 15
PIEDMONT
GERMAN MILLET
ECHINOCHLOA CRUSGALLI
j 40
KtrtrctNl:t: Jfn Olen, M. u. ea. IJaa. Norm l:aronna trOBion ana Jeainnent l:ontroi morning ana ueBign Manual. Kamign, Nl:: Norm uaronno Jealfnentation l:ontroi LoOM MIBBion, Norm
Carolina , and the North Carolina Cooperative Extension Service. 511 pp. Section 6.10.1.
PERMANENT SEED MIX SPECIES
SPECIES (COMMON NAME)
MIN. PERCENTAGE
Panicum rigidulum (Redtop Panicgrass)
25
Panicum anceps (Beaked Panicgrass)
21
Chasmanthium latifolium (River Oats)
20
Elymus virginicus (Virginia Wildrye)
20
Sorghastrum nutans (Indiangrass)
10
Juncus coriaceous (Leathery Rush)
2
Agrostis hyemalis (Winter Bentgrass)
2
TOTAL =
100
PERMANENT SEEDING
1. PERMANENT SEEDING WILL BE REQUIRED ABOVE THE BANKFLOW
ELEVATION ON THE STREAM BANKS, IN THE RIPARIAN BUFFER,
REMNANTS OF THE FILLED CHANNEL, FLOODPLAIN POOL AREAS, AND
ALL STAGING AND STOCKPILING AREAS. ONLY CERTIFIED SEED SHALL
BE ALLOWED.
2. PERMANENT SEEDING WILL BE REQUIRED ONCE ALL PLANTING OF
TREE AND SHRUB SPECIES HAS BEEN COMPLETED WITHIN THE
PLANTING ZONE. PERMANENT SEEDING SHALL OCCUR IN
CONJUNCTION WITH TEMPORARY SEEDING WHEN APPLICABLE.
3. PERMANENT SEED MIX SHALL CONTAIN THE LISTED SPECIES AT THE
MINIMUM PERCENTAGE SHOWN.
4. SPECIES FOR THE PERMANENT SEED MIX WERE DERIVED FROM
RIPARIAN BUFFER MIX ERNMX -307 FROM ERNST CONSERVATION
SEEDS.
5. PERMANENT SEED MIX SHALL CONTAIN A MINIMUM 96 % PURITY
RATE.
6. SEE TEMPORARY SEEDING GUIDELINES FOR SEEDBED PREPARATION.
7. SEED MAY BE APPLIED WITH TEMPORARY SEED OR OVER SEEDED
WHEN TEMPORARY SEEDING HAS BEEN COMPLETED.
8. MULCH IF PERMANENT SEED IS SOWN DURING WINTER OR THE
TEMPORARY PLANTING IS NO LONGER PRESENT.
9. RESEED AND MULCH AREAS WHERE SEEDLING EMERGENCE IS LESS
THAN 80% COVERAGE, OR WHERE EROSION OCCURS, AS SOON AS
POSSIBLE. DO NOT MOW. PROTECT FROM TRAFFIC AS MUCH AS
POSSIBLE.
10. SEE TEMPORARY SEEDING GUIDELINES FOR MAINTENANCE PLAN.
11. PERMANENT SEED SHALL BE APPLIED IN ALL DISTURBED AREAS AT
A RATE OF 15 LBS /ACRE.
PLANTING INSTRUCTIONS
PLANTING TECHNIQUES:
A) ENSURE THAT ROOTS, ONCE REMOVED FROM POT, ARE STRAIGHTENED AND FACE DOWNWARD.
B) CREATE PLANTING AREA FOR EACH PLANT AND EXCAVATE PIT.
C) PLACE PLANTS IN PIT INSURING ROOTS ARE FACING COMPLETELY DOWNWARD.
D HEEL IN SOIL AROUND PLANT AND PROCEED TO NEXT PLANTING LOCATION.
E) NEWLY PLANTED PLANTS NEED TO BE FASTENED TO THE SUBSTRATE FOR THE ESTABLISHMENT OF NEW ROOTS
F) ROOTS SHALL BE SPREAD IN THEIR NORMAL POSITION. ALL BROKEN OR FRAYED ROOTS SHALL BE CUT OFF CLEANLY.
G) THE DIAMETER OF THE PITS FOR ALL VEGETATIVE STOCK SHALL BE AT LEAST THREE TIMES THE DIAMETER OF THE ROOT
MASS. PLANT PIT WALL SHALL BE SCARIFIED PRIOR INSTALLATION.
H) SET THE PLANTS UPRIGHT, IN THE CENTER OF THE PIT. THE BOTTOM OF THE ROOT MASS SHOULD BE RESTING ON
UNDISTURBED SOIL.
1) PLACE THE BACKFILL AROUND THE BASE AND SIDES OF THE MASS, AND WORK EACH LAYER TO SETTLE BACKFILL AND TO
ELIMINATE VOIDS AND AIR POCKETS. WHEN PIT IS APPROXIMATELY j FULL, WATER THOROUGHLY BEFORE PLACING
REMAINDER OF THE BACKFILL. WATER AGAIN AFTER PLACING FINAL LAYER OF BACKFILL.
J) BROKEN OR DAMAGED PARTS WILL BE CUT BACK TO UNDAMAGED TISSUE, LEAVING AS MUCH GREEN BASAL TISSUE AS
POSSIBLE ABOVE THE ROOTS. IF MORE THAN FIFTY PERCENT (50 %) OF THE PLANT IS DAMAGED THEN CONTRACTOR SHALL
REPLACE THE PLANT.
BARE ROOT / CONTAINERIZED STOCK:
A) STOCK SHALL HAVE BEEN GROWN LONG ENOUGH FOR THE ROOT SYSTEM TO HAVE DEVELOPED SUFFICIENTLY TO HOLD ITS
SOIL TOGETHER ONCE REMOVED.
B) CONTAINER PLANTS WILL NEED TO BE WATERED REGULARLY AND PLACED IN SHADY CONDITIONS UNTIL PLANTING OCCURS.
C) BARE ROOT PLANTS ARE FOR IMMEDIATE PLANTING, OTHERWISE SEE D) BELOW.
D) IF BARE ROOTS SPECIMENS ARE NOT TO BE PLANTED WITHIN FOUR (4) DAYS, TEMPORARY HOLDING OF BARE ROOT
SPECIMENS ARE TO BE COVERED ENTIRELY BY A SUITABLE MEDIUM (ETC. SOIL, SAWDUST, MULCH OR THE LIKE) AND
WATERED REGULARLY SO AS NOT TO DRY OUT.
E) ALL SPECIES CHANGE REQUESTS MUST BE APPROVED BY ECOENGINEERING BEFORE PLANTING.
PLANT LOCATIONS:
A) NEW PLANTINGS SHALL BE LOCATED WHERE SHOWN ON PLAN EXCEPT WHERE CHANGES HAVE BEEN APPROVED IN
PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION.
B) PLANT SPACING SHALL FOLLOW REQUIREMENTS NOTED WITHIN PLANT DISTRIBUTION NOTES LISTED ON THIS SHEET.
C) NECESSARY ADJUSTMENTS SHALL BE MADE ONLY AFTER APPROVAL BY THE OWNER OR THE OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE.
WATER:
WATER SHALL BE POTABLE AND SHALL NOT CONTAIN ELEMENTS TOXIC TO PLANT LIFE.
SEEDBED PREPARATION WITHIN LIMITS OF
DISTURBANCE AREAS ONLY
1. CHISEL COMPACTED AREAS AND SPREAD TOPSOIL 3 INCHES DEEP OVER ADVERSE SOIL CONDITIONS, IF AVAILABLE.
2. RIP THE ENTIRE AREA TO 6 INCHES DEPTH.
3. REMOVE ALL LOSE ROCK, ROOTS, AND OTHER OBSTRUCTIONS LEAVING SURFACE REASONABLY SMOOTH AND
UNIFORM.
4. PER ONE TIME ONLY, APPLY LIME UNIFORMLY AND MIX WITH SOIL.
5. CONTINUE TILLAGE UNTIL A WELL- PULVERIZED, FIRM, RESONABLY UNIFORM SEEDBED IS PREPARED 4 TO 6 INCHES
DEEP.
6. SEED ON FRESHLY PREPARED SEEDBED AND COVER.
7. MULCH IMMEDIATLEY AFTER SEEDING AND ANCHOR MULCH.
8. INSPECT ALL SEEDED AREAS AND MAKE NECESSARY REPAIRS OR RESEEDINGS WITHIN THE PLANTING SEASON, IF
POSSIBLE.
9. CONSULT INSPECTOR ON MAINTENANCE TREATMENT AFTER PERMANENT COVER IS ESTABLISHED.
INVASIVE SPECIES CONTROL
1. PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE THE AREAS WHERE INVASIVES ARE TO BE
REMOVED / TREATED WITH HERBICIDE WITH THE PROPERTY OWNER, EASEMENT OWNER, AND THE DESIGNER.
2. REMOVE CHINESE PRIVET (LIGUSTRUM SINESE), RUSSIAN OLIVE (ELAEAGNUS ANGUSTIFOLIA), ENGLISH IVY
(HEDRA HELIX), AND MULTIFLORA ROSE (ROSA MULTIFLORA) FROM THE DESIGNATED WOODED AREAS.
3. THE TRUNKS, BRANCHES, AND VINES OF THESE SPECIES WILL BE BAGGED & REMOVED FROM THE SITE
WITH MINIMAL DISTURBANCE TO THE SOIL SURFACE.
4. LIQUID HERBICIDE CONTAINING GLYPHOSATE WILL BE APPLIED TO ALL AREAS WHERE THE CHINESE PRIVET
AND MULTIFLORA ROSE HAVE BEEN REMOVED. PLEASE NOTE THE USE OF HERBICIDES WILL REQUIRE THE
APPROVAL OF THE PROPERTY OWNER, EASEMENT OWNER, AND THE DESIGNER. ONLY EPA APPROVED AQUATIC
FORMULATIONS SHALL BE USED, WITH THE FOLLOWING CHEMICALS BANNED FROM USE:
• NON- AQUATIC HERBICIDES
• COPPER SULFATE
INSERT BAR AT ANGLE SHOWN
AND PUSH FORWARD TO
UPRIGHT POSITION.
PUSH BAR FORWARD FROM
PLANTER FIRMING SOIL AT TOP
OF ROOTS.
REMOVE BAR AND PLACE
SEEDLING AT CORRECT DEPTH.
FILL IN LAST HOLE BY
STAMPING WITH HEEL.
DON'T EXPOSE ROOTS TO AIR
DURING FREEZE OR PLANT IN
FROZEN GROUND.
INSERT BAR TWO INCHES
TOWARD PLANTER FROM
SEEDLING.
FIRM SOIL AROUND SEEDLING
WITH FEET.
PLANT SEEDLINGS UPRIGHT - DO NOT BEND ROOTS SO
NOT AT AN ANGLE. THAT THEY ANGLE UPWARDS
OUT OF THE GROUND.
DIBBLE DETAIL
NOT TO SCALE
PULL BAR TOWARD PLANTER
FIRMING SOIL AT BOTTOM OF
ROOTS.
TEST PLANTING BY PULLING
LIGHTLY ON SEEDLING.
ALWAYS PLANT IN SOIL -
NEVER LOOSE LEAVES OR
DEBRIS. PACK SOIL TIGHTLY.
PRELIMINARY DRAWING - NOT RELEASED FOR CONSTRUCTION
•
W w
Z °
U
W
E � o
U z z
v, W a Lm M
U 00
� xz�
■� 0 a q
W A c;
A
H P2 3,
O o W E''
Z
o z p� �
.w dumm■
wo
> a Mw�
m
� m
■
W
i
w��
W d
W o
C3
z
W
rn
O
y
ll'i a
E4
zA
E-+ d a z
I-+ a a
W d
E-4 "
�E
G�
W
x
��z
Z m
W �x�
E��
Q � A
L) -4
z
I:
O
a
z
O
C`3 O
U
° z
Z
z
O
� U
a
�D Mm
Qa
U
PROJECT N0. DKU -8010
FILENAME: DKU8010 -LS1
DESIGNED BY: GH B
DRAWN BY: ANG /GHB
SCALE: N.T.S.
ATE: 10 -26 -2012
HEET N0.
LS -2
E 1 ' 1

/ i / ......� ............ _ ...
...
.......
/..
4 ..... �`......... ,
/ _ - _
- -_ '- ... _ / - - -- -_ 11 / -
/ - / y_ -� / 11 _ _ / - -
/ - o,: - - - - - -- i
1. .::. ­­ ... ..... _ _ -
.........
�S�Z�7'_�\
.. :::.. -- -- - -
::
° .—
EXISTING 1' CONTOUR ::. -
CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE ..... - ,. M - TYPICAL RIFFLE 30 0 ,5 30 60
�u =ui�u iii - iii =iii iii - iii = iii- ui�ii=
H a =iii a =i iii =iii�ii =i i�
iii- ui�ii- iii = iii - iii - iii - iii - iii -ui 1 - STAGING AND STOCKPILE AREAS SCALE: 1 = 5
u�u- iii�u- iii�I- iii�I- iii�I- iii�ii�ii WOOD TOE 11 1 inch = 30 ft. / I � \
.111111111, SILT FENCE OUTLET LIVE STAKES /WHIPS OR BRUSH CUTTINGS 20.0'
LOG VANE 11.6' M
SF - SF - SF SILT FENCE HARDWOOD TREE 2.5' � o
�� SEE SHEET EC -1 FOR CONSTRUCTION
LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE LOG CROSS -VANE 5 0� SEQUENCE AND EROSION CONTROL NOTES.
� PINE TREE
����� DIVERSION DITCH TYPICAL POOL
SCALE: 1"=5'
0�7 g
OWNER:
DUKE UNIVERSITY
FACILITIES MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT
114 SOUTH BUCHANAN BOULEVARD
DURHAM, NORTH CAROLINA
EcoEngineering
A division of The John R. McAdams Company, Inc.
PROJECT NO. DKU -08010
PLAN & PROFILE
NORTH, STA. 0 +00 THRU STA. 12 +00
KE IVE y
STREAM MITIGATION
DURHAM COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
SHEET N0.
Mc
PRINT DATE:
Pjj
5
N 0 RTH
FILENAME: DKU08010 -P1
4
1
DESIGNED BY: ANG
3
DRAWN BY: ANG /JES /KAS
ENGINEERS ■ PLANNERS ■ SURVEYORS ■ ENVIRONMENTAL
z
HORIZ. SCALE: 1" = 30'
RESEARCH TRIANGLE PARK ■ CHARLOTTE
2905 Meridian Parkway, Durham NC 27713
800 -733 -5646 ■ wwwjohnrmeadams.com ■ License No.: C -0293
1
..
365
REVISIONS
DATE
DATE:
10 -26 -12
365
z
0
���
of
EXISTING
o
;; W)
"' ir'
PROPOSED
STREAM
BED
II
STREAM
BED
EXIS
ING
GRADE
- - -
-
U�
oQ
-
J
,�
11
11
��
360
W
Q
H J
t0 C7
N o
\
.. 360
. ........ .........
__� -`_
....... ............................... ......... .......:.
-�
................. ..........................�....
r
.........
.........
......... ........ .........
°'
............................. .. ...............................
._
\
.........
.........
.........
..
......... ......
... ......... ......... .........
+�
M
�iUO
��
M
0) O....
O
QO
J
QO N
N
n�
- --
\
�-�
�a�
aOM
rl'I II
wry
OM
3.
u7^
O
II
\ ✓/'
��
n
•�
,ri
©�
��
+�
oo,
,n
aNM
II
J��
O
+�
/
I
=�v~iw
J
nM
wM
II
n
_
_
Go
OQ�
O
^M
-
- _\
zv~iW
J
W
a�j
M
J
c9v~i
I
_j
Orn
O
;;
+� o
M
I
co
�N
O
aNM
+�
W
OQ�
II
M
+�
�M
CV -
+'M
W
II'
/
I
I
II
arnM
J
J
o
II
C�v~iW
wN
II
DOM
�W
7���
EC
OQ�
J
I
o
N I
II
p�
w FIB
M
II
X:
W
JI��.
�p
JaJ
�n ;. c�
v~i W
ONpj
OQ�
I
_
I
2
W
I ..
Q
0
O
,,�
�.
O+
daOM
�n J
U'W
J
I�
M�
^j
rno
N\
/
1
777
11
I I
W
�a
04 I
�FaF�
+�
OW
��
355
- - - -. :.
............................ ......... .........
- - - -. ..
.......... ............................... ......... .........
.......... ............................... ......... .........
- - - -.
- - - -.:
.......... ............................... ......... .........
.......... ............................... .........
.........
+ .:
......... .......
- - -- .......
,.
O :1 - - --
N..............................
...............................
- --
SO
I
I - - - -. I
- - - -. II .:
................
- - - -. I
521-
- - - -.2
N W -.
.........
......... .....
��.��
1
N
.�
...
.... ....
.........
.........
......
rn
.....
......... ......
.........
355
........ ......... .....................................
1. 3
..
W
J
�QT,.
M ;:
II:
Jrn
oM
I�
+�
M
Oco:,
+�:,
J�cO
. t0
��
co
'`�
;:
to
��
:.
I
;:
�..
I
I
I;
zQ�.,��`'
N II
II
W
ISM
�'3.
+
NM
J
o
p t0 ':::3
+�
t0
+�
\�
���
I
to O
+.°
co
J.;
O
+
W
M II
'`� :
O
+
coo
rn CV
o
J
II =:3.
II
rn
i. �.
.
ENHANCEME T AREA
oQ
'`�
II
II
i
�Fn
Q JZa�'
WO
II
J
a
M - �Rul
II I�
Q
I
-J
J co
o +i°
o0to
ao :. O
�i° oM
0Ui LO
in
'moow
CVM
J
J
v~iw
o
�Q�
N II W
II o
'.:
N II
II
Q�
'
\
JOi°
Opp
co
I
it
+�
I
o
N p
II
Q
of
M
Ltla
lil
O
x
W
0
lal
d M II
11 -
+ 1n + 1n
i
1n
i-
I
J J
J
i..
O+
1n
1n M
J
CA
J
J
II
..
..
.
.
JM^
p
+�
oa J
�v~iW
�'`�
w
10
II II prnM
II II aN
II
�h
'�st
om
N�
V�
M
O�
NM
,�
T.
I
1,
o
N II
II
1 333. �
WQ�
-
II
t+
Jao�
c�
J
w
N 3.333..
n
�r?i.
p�M
w_Q
Q�
II
rn
+in
+�n
MN
^
I
rI
�a
�v~iw
N
II
OMB
a�
n� _
pQ�
19 ii
J
.
�W
J
�Q
II I
toles
JMM
JN
w
II
II
ZEI'
N II
WN
U+OM
II
+�
DOM
"' 1
O�
M
'}��
I3
I
li
1
Q
t aNM
11,41
' o
II
��
+ :... \
,
II Jrn�
ISO i
�v~iw
F
r
O0)M
wa�
OQ
J
J
II
N II
+�
'�
o
ao
fl.
a ,�i
IE
I O�up
pQ�
�
W
�aJ
v~iw
.. \J
II I
Z
I1
WNM
II
Jto�
oaoC.�n�
...
^O tp
n^
�O
1
QQN
Ltla
..
:. I
W aNM
o
II
350
...
......
.........
............
...............
................. ...............................
_ J
FF
.NNW
,�a�.,
......... -
J .........a'
J
W......
J
L�
-- ......,
I ....
..... o+
In ........
....
........ .........
�N
M
.......:-
n�
......:.
.........
--
.. ..... O..
.3
........
-.
.......: .......
...
1 : .......
...
--
..
.......
--
.. --
.........
--
/=v~i
..
...... -..
... -.
......
.........
.. -- .....Q
....... .... L�.l
:: 350
J ............................................... .
- - - -. - - - -.
Ei
- - - -. - - - -. - - - -. - - - -.
;.
- - - -. - -. - - - -. -.
-- .:::.
- - - -. - - - -.
-- - -.;:.
:.
- - - -. - - - -.
;;:.
- - - -. ::�
:.
- - -. - - - -.
- - - - -. --
::;. - -.
- - - -.
- - --
- - - -.
:::. - - - -.
- - - -.
- - - -.
- - - -. - - - -. - - - -.
:3.
- - - -.
- - - -. - - - -.
- - - -.
- - - -.
- - - -.
- - --
- - - -.
- - - -. --
- -a'
W
--
- -. _
UL
a'
.. J
W
- -.iL
h Try - -.
N
- -.
- -. .')'d'
0
- -.
+
+ -- --
-- y
+
': - -.
�
O - -.
-
- -.
.-q -.
04 O
' --
-
- - -.
)T77
- -.
--
- -.
- -- �
- -.
- -. _a
- - - -. - -. - -.
W
:.:;
#:
t
...
t
t
t
t
t
...
t
t;:.
o
pQ
lLil1
jI�M
LJ
coo
pcj
WI�M
I
N
II I
ISM
cp I
ato
UO
N �I
_�
L
JO
N�
�c00
J
NW
�W
,�W
O
+�
c+o�
IJi II
-'.
NM
O
0
coON
.1
✓
.
\
I
.
+�
O
+�
J1CV
W
II
a-
II
�v~i
Zd;..,�
M-
+
�M
CVN
_
^
aN
I''I
aCl]
I''I
OaNM
J
O
J
W
D
�W
a'
W
NO
N,�ij
WN
DQ
I.. �_�
LO
II
ijN
.1 :
CV�
CVM
OQ
J
0
J
pQ
,�.�
N
JN
II
.1
.1
.1
+�
0,7
+�
oN c4 0
w
Q
�v~iw
WJ
W
.1
Z
N II JM�
II'' p
+�
N II
zQ�
�,�
'nom
0Drn
�M
v~iw
OQ
J pNM
> J JO00
1.
N II
n
345
M
D
-
�v~iw
Q
J
t0
.O
N t0
O
=a
M
N II
II
D
-
J
C9W
Q
J
N to
co
J
t0'
M
1�
.
::.
.
:::.
:::.
:::.
:::.
:::.
:::.
:::.
:::.
::
::
:::.
:::.
:::.
�
N
D
Q
W
II
_.
.
it
N II
�a�
a
II
II
.:
..
D
Q:�
1. .
.
..
..
-
Q�
W
J
i W
340
340
1. .1
1. .1
1. .1
- - -
- ..
. ..
- ..
. ..
- ..
. ..
- ..
- ..
. ..
- ..
. ..
- ..
. ..
- ..
- ..
. ..
- ..
. ..
- ..
. ..
- ..
- .. -
. ..
. ..
- .. -
- .. -
. ..
- .. -
..
#n
':N
. ..
fan ;:t0
_ _
.
..W
:in
[;.0
,:;0
:.0
:i0
.. 0
':N
: N
:ice
: t0
':�
:.0
:ice
: t0
':N
;
:i0
N
O
:.01 ..; =.'01
_
:A.
:140
:A.
[;.0 :A30
':M
i:�
t0
:NCO
':CA
:O
n
:.301
:A.
ti,a)
,:.�
;:3N
:A.
.x.;::01
At0 : t0
':�O
F G �'3
.I�
3n
::�
::�
;3.ri
An
::*
An
;3*
::*
:3�
M
:3r•i .
r3CV
:.. 3CV
:.0
30
Ln
u1
::301
: --
i30i
30i
`M
.. M .. M
.. M
.. M
..
M
.. M
.. M
.. M
.. M
.. M
'M
11 M
.. M .. M
..
M
.. M 'M
`M
M
:M
'M
f3M
'::MI
;:-
'M
;:-
'M :-
34 +00
33 +50 33 +00 32 +50 32 +00
31+50
31+00
30
+50
30 +00
29 +50
29 +00
28 +50
28 +00
27 +50
27 +00
26 +50
26 +00
25 +50
25 +00
24 +50
FINAL DRAWING -
NOT RELEASED
FOR CONSTRUCT N
0�7 g
OWNER:
DUKE UNIVERSITY
FACILITIES MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT
114 SOUTH BUCHANAN BOULEVARD
DURHAM, NORTH CAROLINA
EcoEngineering
A division of The John R. McAdams Company, Inc.
PROJECT NO. DKU -08010
PLAN & PROFILE
NORTH, STA. 0 +00 THRU STA. 12 +00
KE IVE y
STREAM MITIGATION
DURHAM COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
SHEET N0.
Mc
PRINT DATE:
Pjj
5
FILENAME: DKU08010 -P1
4
1
DESIGNED BY: ANG
3
DRAWN BY: ANG /JES /KAS
ENGINEERS ■ PLANNERS ■ SURVEYORS ■ ENVIRONMENTAL
z
HORIZ. SCALE: 1" = 30'
RESEARCH TRIANGLE PARK ■ CHARLOTTE
2905 Meridian Parkway, Durham NC 27713
800 -733 -5646 ■ wwwjohnrmeadams.com ■ License No.: C -0293
1
..
VERT. SCALE: » >
1 = 3
REVISIONS
DATE
DATE:
10 -26 -12

°f 15.8'
0
Md 2.5' 1 4.1' 1 2.5'
TYPICAL RIFFLE
SCALE: 1 " = 5'
20.0'
11.6'
ih
5.0
TYPICAL POOL
SCALE: 1 " =5'
STREAM RESTORATION LEGEND (TYP. ALL SHEETS)
250 5' CONTOUR � �
( ROCK CLUSTERS IN RIFFLE ©` ROCK AND ROLL RIFFLE
252 1' CONTOUR
- - - - -- 250------ EXISTING 5' CONTOUR CLAY PLUG
- - - - -- EXISTING 1' CONTOUR
IF —IV —IF
m m m
STAGING AND STOCKPILE AREAS
SILT FENCE OUTLET
SILT FENCE
LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE
DIVERSION DITCH
CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE
WOOD TOE
LIVE STAKES /WHIPS OR BRUSH CUTTINGS
LOG VANE
HARDWOOD TREE
401% LOG CROSS-VANE
PINE TREE
/:.
\ ...
—
' \ TEMPORARY ACCESS
LOCATION
SILT FENCE WITH SILT
FENCE OUTLET AT ALL 6
\ >..
1
#
■ .
/ /
GRAPHIC SCALE
30 0 15 30 60
1 inch = 30 ft.
SEE SHEET EC -1 FOR CONSTRUCTION
SEQUENCE AND EROSION CONTROL NOTES.
FINAL DRAWING - NOT RELEASED FOR CONSTRUCTION
PROJECT NO. SHEET NO.
EcoEngineering �"M
6 OWNER: DKU -08010
5 ` DKU08010 -P1 P_
4 DUKE UNIVERSITY DESIGNED BY: ANG PLAN & PROFILE
A division of The John R. McAdams Company, Inc. U UN RS
3 FACILITIES MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT DRAWN BY: ANG /JES /KAS AWADAMS
2 114 SOUTH BUCHANAN BOULEVARD ENGINEERS ■ PLANNERS ■ SURVEYORS ■ ENVIRONMENTAL HORIZ. SCALE: 1" = 30' NORTH, STA. 24+50 THRU STA. 20 +28 STREAM MITIGATION
DURHAM, NORTH CAROLINA RESEARCH TRIANGLE PARK ■ CHARLOTTE VERT. SCALE: » > PRINT DATE:
1 2905 Meridian Parkway, Durham NC 27713 1 = 3 DURHAM COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
600- 733 -5646 ■ www.johnrmcadams.com. ■ License No.: C -0293 DATE:
REVISIONS DATE 10 -26 -12
NORTH
360
360
355
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..
355
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. .................................... .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..
. . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..............................................................
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
EXISTING
GRADE:
\
r\
b.
�_
REAM BED
\
o,
JOB
.
`
I
JO
<:
Lij
II
a- qt
\
O
+
N
\
O a
N
QN
Z
ai
N p
a350
N
.....,
350
'W
2
WJ
W
MME)
+�
+�
I
'
JOp
��...
1
/
`
2fA
GN
II
N II
NM
Ofd
M
O�
I
�Ciw
FQ
FQN�
NW
I
N II QN
NM
II
�..11<1�
1N
O
NM
•�
1
U
Oi
Inn
tf
M CNI
I
tn W O
W
1
II 0II
<� �
+�
M
+�
+
1pn
i
Jfd�
OM
+�
�M
`
vl
/
I
iLJ
U'W
WNM\
l
II
^�
�M
O +t
N II
n
Z
�M
M
+�N
Iry
\
I
�=
LU
w c9�nW
Za�J
�W
II
N II
Qa
QF
NW
J
O
'�
0) (1!
+
N
OCW
Wa�
`
345
ZN
=aJ
II
��
JNn
WPM
II II
NLO
fOn
M
`
1
I II WON
��
II
W
1
W
345
:,�
.
M
M
::::::::.
ro
d
��
N
...........
...
...........
... : :.::::..
1..::::
W
....... .........
O�
O
I. II
–
�V)W
F
Z.
II
W
!+)
N II
d+
�:
+
MM
O
+�
N
Oi
np
/
•
va
Za
N II
�N
IIM�
p.....
?
II
L�7a
2
W
WF
W
Z
..
N
II
�M
II
M
�
JN
0=CWa
Z
l:if
WN
+
�M
OC�W
g
0_'(/IW
6
�Q
I`
WNM
JON
+
N�
't
�N
�„
+
o
O
aN
in
dN
_
��
N
Q
�W
aNM
Z
JN
N�:
11
Of
O
I
�W
IWiQ
.
�f~!1W
QaN17
Q
+��
W
F
eq
340
.........
.........
........
.........
...........
.........
........ ...
..... ......:..........
........
I II
a
N jj
J
OOi
W
N jj
340
�rnw
D
–
a
^M
N II
j
O
w
^�......
02
W
JMM
O
+�
M
�fAW
II
00
QN
—
O
+�
IL
p
rill
F J
335
335
:f0 O
tm
:N
W!
O
N
O N
n
4 'N
slo
F/C'
V
+
°�
+
+
a
�
a
M
#Ml
Mf
317
-Ml
31
i17
:31
3 n
1
n
3 1
.......... ...............................
24 +50
.......... ...............................
.......... ...............................
24 +00
.......... ............................... .......... ...............................
23 +50
.......... ...............................
.......... ...............................
23 +00
.......................................... ............................... .......... ............................... .......... ...............................
22 +50 22 +00
.......... ............................... .......... ............................... ..........
21+50
...............................
.......... ...............................
21+00
.......... ............................... .......... ...............................
20 +50
20 +00
GRAPHIC SCALE
30 0 15 30 60
1 inch = 30 ft.
SEE SHEET EC -1 FOR CONSTRUCTION
SEQUENCE AND EROSION CONTROL NOTES.
FINAL DRAWING - NOT RELEASED FOR CONSTRUCTION
PROJECT NO. SHEET NO.
EcoEngineering �"M
6 OWNER: DKU -08010
5 ` DKU08010 -P1 P_
4 DUKE UNIVERSITY DESIGNED BY: ANG PLAN & PROFILE
A division of The John R. McAdams Company, Inc. U UN RS
3 FACILITIES MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT DRAWN BY: ANG /JES /KAS AWADAMS
2 114 SOUTH BUCHANAN BOULEVARD ENGINEERS ■ PLANNERS ■ SURVEYORS ■ ENVIRONMENTAL HORIZ. SCALE: 1" = 30' NORTH, STA. 24+50 THRU STA. 20 +28 STREAM MITIGATION
DURHAM, NORTH CAROLINA RESEARCH TRIANGLE PARK ■ CHARLOTTE VERT. SCALE: » > PRINT DATE:
1 2905 Meridian Parkway, Durham NC 27713 1 = 3 DURHAM COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
600- 733 -5646 ■ www.johnrmcadams.com. ■ License No.: C -0293 DATE:
REVISIONS DATE 10 -26 -12

g
OWNER:
DUKE UNIVERSITY
FACILITIES MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT
114 SOUTH BUCHANAN BOULEVARD
DURHAM, NORTH CAROLINA
EcoEngineering
A division of The John R. McAdams Company, Inc.
PROJECT NO. DKU -08010
PLAN & PROFILE
CENTRAL, STA. 29 +37 THRU STA. 19 +97
DU UN RS
STREAM MITIGATION
DURHAM COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
SHEET N0.
-
HIMCADAMS
PRINT DATE:
5
FILENAME: DKU08010 -P3
4
DESIGNED BY: ANG
3
DRAWN BY: ANG /JES /KAS
ENGINEERS ■ PLANNERS ■ SURVEYORS ■ ENVIRONMENTAL
z
CENTRAL
HORIZ. SCALE: 1" = 30'
RESEARCH TRIANGLE PARK ■ CHARLOTTE
2905 Meridian Parkway, Durham NC 27713
800 -733 -5646 ■ wwwjohnrmeadams.com ■ License No.: C -0293
1
..
VERT. SCALE: �/ /
1 = 3
REVISIONS
DATE
DATE:
10 -26 -12
350
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
11
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
350
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1.
0
�'?
o
�rn
+
�
-
- -
�
11
11
-rnN
Q
H
J
- �\
345
n
W
I
0
/
1. 345
00
�
\
.:
.
rQJ
..x
\
:
G
: GRADE
_
t N
p
1
M
.
. J
.
\
N II
M
Q J
r5
.
N
:
N
C
I
j
\
..i .
/
p
II
I
,
Go-
c
i
vi w
W
O
+
0
II
-
(0 0
O
f
1n
Q
\
I
\
-
.
�
� '
\
1.
O
N
II
Q
=
3
+
rl to
J
p
( .
- -
- . =
\
D
.. ..
W
J
'
F
d+
(0
II
N.
\O
\
1.
1. 1.
1.
1.
�
Q
�
11
+
M
\
1.
EXISTING
/
a
QF
S TR EAM
BED:
-
340
I .............
/
I
Q
I
Q �
J
^
p +M
+ M
4 *
W
n ti
o
I
O
. N
...
i
\
11
340
/
(
Y
N
p
.
..
I
I
N
o
w
1n
+ �
D h
N
.
0)
.
N
I ......_..
t0
\
:
�
�:
.
3.
I
II
QQ
= 11
!
=
-i
11
(
�
�
. :n
1
#re)
N
:
+
\
4.
::
I
y
AO
O
0 M
N II
;
,
a
1
Q
Q' -
-
N
�
I
I
O
O
0
'
�
t0
: I
do
M
1
I
+ M
%.j
a
11
C
�
Z
II :
.
� O
n M
O
� M
NA
I
M
O
W
. L a
Q
J
J
0
n
0
I
-
�
Q
J
O 1
II
+
C
1.
I
. :I
2M
O
M
1.
I
Q
II
'
Q
U
Q
�
II
J
IIN
II
1.
+i
°
M
*
+
M
a'
QU
1
QQ
' '
r
IJN
O
J
'o
p:
�(p
1.
N
'
`
1
to
co
N
1.
O
aW jQ
11
N
�
0
. :: �
W
M
}N
I
Q
Q�
JI�
ln
� II
II
M a0
�t0
��
+
(off
N1n
�o
p
p
a
II
QQ
�
?
II
II
�{
O
0 M
+
N
\
O~
h
II
1.
335
.
.........
...
. .........
D .
.
a
+
....
C
Q ......
... ..
II
. ..............G.
�
:�.
.:::...
M
M ..:
J
�
M..N
. ........
...........................
O s
. .. N
� F* ..
:.
.......
0 Imo . ::::::::
.......
..
�a.}......
.�
..................
...............................
. ........
.... .....
.........
:::::::.
:
:::: :::
::.
.....
..
.......
:::::::. .
......
...... :
o
:.
�
: "
"I':: ....:

STREAM RESTORATION LEGEND (TYP. ALL SHEETS) _ 1
/� SILT FENCE WITH S,LT
Vii% / /�/ / \
/ FEN OUTLET AT ALL
250 SfLl__FE 0€ _ ' i // / / LOW POINTS (TYP.) w LD
5' CONTOUR // 00 ROCK CLUSTERS IN RIFFLE �UTLET�TYP'
252 1' CONTOUR 0 Q' ' p ROCK AND ROLL RIFFLE j ' / / — — A \
\ \\ \ \ / / / BOCI�AND�OLL� — �s��s�_es�A�
- - - - -- 250 - - - - -- EXISTING 5' CONTOUR CLAY PLUG -- % \ \ \\ — _ — — // / / iii / / / RIFFLE-(TYYPi % J fir/ \
... .,
-_ —� \ — / 9
..
EXISTING 1 CONTOUR — — _ — i — \ _ / i/ % �/ WOOD TOE &P.) ROCK CLUSTERS
CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE � � — —__ -_ ��� � _ �1 \ \ � — — � � — � � � /� / / �i i
_ A \ VA /� E (TYP.)
STAGING AND STOCKPILE AREAS `..
WOOD TOE
F20LL ..... A \
r SILT FENCE OUTLET LIVE STAKES/WHIPS OR BRUSH CUTTINGS \?
illllllli / - - -- - - -� 9N/ /
/ /// ��% ��� ��_ -- /�IFLE (TYP) i
sF —sF —sF SILT FENCE LOG VANEy // / _ _ _ _ _ _ j/
// / //i
/
// TA S// / �s
HARDWOOD TREE �KkiI�S- 8R'TYP max,
GG // ��A V� m �— —�� \
LOG //ANE TYP: / _CUTTIM6S� / / .
//
LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE LOG CROSS -VANE / �Q�
TH
f, - --
PINE TREE _
DIVERSION DITCH 1 GIVE SbAKES /; / /
IIIr 111 �
II�III I s
it ili �
I;! I.
;I 4, I#
FV�W!Ao
/ ) 1 V —
/
tom I _ i
/: :; :....
Lr
4/
llr / ill
r6
OWNER:
DUKE UNIVERSITY
FACILITIES MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT
114 SOUTH BUCHANAN BOULEVARD
DURHAM, NORTH CAROLINA
gineering
A division of The John R. McAdams Company, Inc.
PROJECT NO. DKU -08010
PLAN & PROFILE
SOUTH, STA. 18 +80 THRU STA. 9 +61
DU UN RS
STREAM MITIGATION
DURHAM COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
SHEET N0. d
P_ 4
HiMcADAMS
PRINT DATE:
FILENAME: DKU08010 -P1
4
DESIGNED BY: ANG
3
DRAWN BY: ANG /JES /KAS
ENGINEERS ■ PLANNERS ■ SURVEYORS ■ ENVIRONMENTAL
2
HORIZ. SCALE: 1" = 30'
RESEARCH TRIANGLE PARK ■ CHARLOTTE
2905 Meridian Parkway, Durham NC 27713
800 -733 -5646 ■ wwwjohnrmeadams.com ■ License No.: C -0293
1
VERT. SCALE: » >
1 = 3
REVISIONS
DATE
DATE:
10 -26 -12

REACH
EXISTING
LENGTH
(LF)
RESTORED
LENGTH
(LF)
APPROACH
MITIGATION
RATIO
CREDITS
(SMUs)
1
243
243
E2/4
1:4
61
2
622
562
R
1:1
562
3
550
540
R
1:1
540
4
721
609
R
1:1
609
4A
33
33
E2/4
0
0
5
339
300
R
1:1
300
6
312
258
R
1:1
258
7
373
358
E2/4
1:4
90
8
266
303
R
1:1
303
TOTAL SMUs = 2,723
LEGEND
EXISTING STREAM CHANNEL
RIPARIAN BUFFER
— - . ' `'� PROPOSED (RESTORED /ENHANCED) STREAM CHANNEL
REACH BREAK
GRAPHIC SCALE
100 0 50 100 200
1 inch = 100 ft.
PRELIMINARY (NARY DRAWING e NOT RELEASED FOR CONSTRUCTION
0) E
•
W w
L zz
U Z Fez
o C „
� W a CQ a
uz
L) 0
W aQ
ai tea'' dG1. �
A0
O W F
0 °•
o z x •�,
o z
Wa pqw�
;b wLN2�
w d
w o
z Co
c�
z
w
0
y
a a
H
zA
z
d w z
�-+ a �Z> a
wZ
x
z�z
dm
W x
��
w o a"
Q � `� A
a
c� d
z
0
a
z
O
00
U
� a
o
z W
a
o
� U
O
AQ
V i
Qa
U
PROJECT NO DKU -8010
FILENAME: DKU- 8010 -51
DESIGNED BY: AN G
DRAWN BY: JES
SCALE: 1 n =100,
DATE: 10-26-2012
SHEET N0.
C -1

J (S�JIS I RHI QEV -JBIk�
/ allor R METAL
A)£E(EN- .TBB.O I bVV WT },T)L 85/ /s NV WJ 3
4N
X55
- ��. L IIII "C.� ��� %i %i�� /���i, /l� ✓ ,:�, ,.r?�, : / %�y�l l��ii / /�f'( \ _ / a _.:...__ \ _ / v %�
\f/ 1'i''is /
/�V WTT (SW/ -JJA05 /
� / I
- .- I \\ \Illlllll�\\I I 1 \\
--
� \���`�� / \11
��
�A \�'�
LEGEND
0
EXISTING IRON PIPE
•
IRON PIPE SET
•
CALCULATED POINT
BORE HOLE
�S
SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE
©
SANITARY SEWER CLEANOUT
Wv
WATER VALVE
®
WATER METER
FIRE HYDRANT
T❑
TELEPHONE PEDESTAL
Q
TELEPHONE MANHOLE
Q
ELECTRIC BOX
C
LIGHT POLE
0-)
POWER POLE
CURB INLET
O
STORM DRAINAGE MANHOLE
❑
YARD INLET
DRIVEWAY CULVERT
SD
STORM DRAIN
OU
OVERHEAD UTILITY LINE
UE
UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC
UT
UNDERGROUND TELEPHONE
W
WATER LINE
SS SANITARY SEWER LINE
G
GAS LINE
— X
X FENCE LINE
� ► I
GRAPHIC SCALE
100 0 50 100 200
1 inch = 100 ft.
PRELIMINARY DRAWING e NOT RELEASED FOP, CONSTRUCTION
0) E
•
W w
z °
U
w
E � o
U z
b-4
a
O L, p
W a A "•
ujpt
H a a9
O W E-
z xl
o z a�
duno'
ko
W a �wko
A
P4 d
W o
c�
z
w
r�r^
Vhl
a a
E
zA
z
d w z
�-+ a a
wZ
z�z
d�
W x
w o x
Q 0 -4
a
L
z
0
a
z
O
O
o� a
F
U Z
O
O
z
0
U
O
U Z
rrA Q
vi
A a
U
PROJECT N0. DKU -08010
FILENAME: DKU- 8010 -C2
DESIGNED BY: AN G
DRAWN BY: JES
SCALE: 1 » =100'
DATE: 10-26-2012
SHEET N0.
C -2
E���

DURHAM COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
PROJECT NUMBER: DKU-80 10
DATE: OCTOBER 26, 2012
OWNER
I ol li IkIl Ali � I kyj D) t4"j 0 V4
PRELIMINARY DRAWING - NOT RELEASED FOR CONSTRUCTION

NORTH
o
CENTRAL
4
lr
�� /// / �� _ �� - �A� \ \� \ VA\ V\o I I \I
SOUTH
............
......... ..........
/7r,//
�(li��lvv1 it / v A v v v vv vv��vAvvv� \vv
\)�
\ ?�TE PO R�AAESS \ 1 I I 1\ \ I I
\
HARDWOOD TREE
\ I
- - - f / /
/
..:- LOCATION OF STORMWATER
OUTFACE ENHANCEMENT
I
/
�k
1
�
II I
............
......... ..........
/7r,//
�(li��lvv1 it / v A v v v vv vv��vAvvv� \vv
\)�
\ ?�TE PO R�AAESS \ 1 I I 1\ \ I I
\
L:ttLT FENCE \
Q
�- m am
SILT FENCE
/ (TYP.)
..1
... \
dv
Lo
lD�- .... \ :.:, i / - - - J - - - - / / T 1
I I- III -I I �I I I- :.. ► . � ::/ / / � / - � /� \..t�
-
I
Yl
070 P
I
I
/ --
/� /%_ Imo,
II
: � \ � - -- �_ �!/ _� � - -\ ✓/ ✓ \�I�� ,�` ��
-III Hil
�
,1111111
/ III ,/
/ l
/p 'z
LEGEND
• SILT FENCE OUTLET
SILT FENCE
LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE
mug=
5
CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE
1' CONTOUR
5' CONTOUR
EXISTING 5' CONTOUR
EXISTING 1' CONTOUR
STAGING AND STOCKPILE AREAS
CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE
LIVE STAKES /WHIPS OR BRUSH CUTTINGS
HARDWOOD TREE
\ I
- - - f / /
/
..:- LOCATION OF STORMWATER
OUTFACE ENHANCEMENT
I
/
L:ttLT FENCE \
Q
�- m am
SILT FENCE
/ (TYP.)
..1
... \
dv
Lo
lD�- .... \ :.:, i / - - - J - - - - / / T 1
I I- III -I I �I I I- :.. ► . � ::/ / / � / - � /� \..t�
-
I
Yl
070 P
I
I
/ --
/� /%_ Imo,
II
: � \ � - -- �_ �!/ _� � - -\ ✓/ ✓ \�I�� ,�` ��
-III Hil
�
,1111111
/ III ,/
/ l
/p 'z
LEGEND
• SILT FENCE OUTLET
SILT FENCE
LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE
mug=
5
CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE
1' CONTOUR
5' CONTOUR
EXISTING 5' CONTOUR
EXISTING 1' CONTOUR
STAGING AND STOCKPILE AREAS
CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE
LIVE STAKES /WHIPS OR BRUSH CUTTINGS
CONSTRUCTION SEQUENCE AND EROSION & SEDIMENT CONTROL
MOBII.I7 kIlON AND EROSION AND SEDDIENT CONTROL
1. ESTABLISH CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE (SHEET D1) AND STAGING AREA. LIMIT TREE REMOVAL TO THE MINIMUM
EXTENT POSSIBLE.
2. LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE SHALL BE MARKED BY SILT FENCE OR ORANGE TREE PROTECTION FENCE (SHEET D2).
3. USE THE AREA DESIGNATED ON THE PLANS FOR ALL STAGING ACTIVITIES RELATED TO THE PROJECT.
4. PARK ALL CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT, INCLUDING TRUCKS AND HEAVY EQUIPMENT WITHIN THE LIMITS OF
DISTURBANCE.
5. CONTRACTOR TO UTILIZE TEMPORARY STREAM CROSSINGS FOR ACCESS.
6. INSTALL SILT FENCE FOR STAGING AND STOCKPILE AREAS (SHEET D1).
7. SILT FENCE WITH 6' SUPPORT SPACING OR WITH WIRE BACKING SHALL BE INSTALLED AROUND THE DOWNSLOPE
PERIMETER OF ALL SOIL STOCKPILE AREAS.
8. LARGE SPECIMEN TREES THAT HAVE BEEN FLAGGED SHOULD BE AVOIDED TO THE GREATEST EXTENT POSSIBLE.
9. COMPLETE ALL PLANTING.
10. STABILIZE ALL DISTURBED AREAS. REMOVE STAGING AREA AND CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE.
11. DEMOBILIZE ALL EQUIPMENT AND MATERIALS FROM SITE.
SM PREPARATION: CLEARING. AND SOIL SUBSOIL EXCAVATION
1. ALL SHRUBS AND SMALL TREES DESIGNATED BY THE ENGINEER WILL BE SAVED FOR TRANSPLANTING. PLANTS
THAT ARE TO BE TRANSPLANTED WILL BE MARKED WITH HIGHLY VISIBLE TAPE.
2. CONTRACTOR SHALL MANAGE EXCAVATED TOPSOIL SEPARATELY FROM EXCAVATED SUBSOIL. EXCAVATED TOPSOIL
SHALL BE PLACED WITHIN THE DESIGNATED TEMPORARY STOCKPILE AREAS AWAY FROM THE CHANNEL TO BE
FILLED (SEE PLANS). TOPSOIL SHALL BE FREE OF STONES OVER 1" IN DIAMETER, ROOTS, STICKS, RUBBISH,
STIFF CLAY, AND EXTRANEOUS MATTER.
3. EXCAVATED SUBSOIL SHALL BE PLACED NEAR THE CHANNEL TO BE FILLED. ONCE THE NEW STREAM IS
CONSTRUCTED, SUBSOIL SHALL BE USED TO FILL THE EXISTING CHANNEL FIRST, THEN STOCKPILED TOPSOIL
SHALL BE USED FOR THE FINAL 6 INCHES OF FILL.
4. IF FILL MATERIAL IS REQUIRED, IT SHALL BE FREE OF DEBRIS AND MEET THE FOLLOWING GRADATION TESTED IN
ACCORDANCE WITH ASTM D -422
SIEVE SIZE PERCENT PASSING
2 INCH 100
1 INCH 90 -100
j INCH 60 -90
NO. 40 0 -60
NO. 200 0 -35
PLASTICITY INDEX (PI) < 15 AND LIQUID LIMIT <40 PER ASTM D -4318.
THE MAXIMUM AGGREGATE SIZE SHALL BE LIMITED TO INCH
FILL MATERIAL MAY BE SITE - EXCAVATED SOILS WHERE T HE ABOVE REQUIREMENTS CAN
BE MET. UNSUITABLE SOILS FOR BACKFILL (HIGH PLASTIC CLAYS OR ORGANIC SOILS) SHALL NOT BE USED
IN THE BACKFILL OR IN THE REINFORCED SOIL MASS. VISUAL OBSERVATION SHALL BE SUFFICIENT FOR THE
APPROVAL OF SITE - EXCAVATED SOILS.
6. IMPORTED TOSOIL SHALL HAVE A LOAMY TEXTURE AND HAVE SAND, SILT, AND CLAY PERCENTAGES THAT MEET
THE U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICUTLTURE CHARACTERISTICS OF A LOAMY SOIL. ORGANIC CONTENT SHALL NOT BE
LESS THAN 1.5% BY WIEGHT. PH RANGE SHALL BE FROM 6 -7.5. IF PH IS LESS THAN 6, LIME SHALL BE ADDED.
SOLUBLE SALTS SHALL NOT EXCEED 50OPPM. IMPROTED TOPSOIL SHALL BE FREE OF DEBRIS, ROOTS, PLANTS,
STICKS, RUBBISH, STIFF CLAYS, AND STONES OVER 1 INCH IN DIAMETER.
1. INSTALL PUMP AROUND ALONG 200' TO 300' OF STREAM CHANNEL, OR NO MORE THAN
CAN BE CONSTRUCTED IN ONE (1) WORKING DAY (DEWATERING AND PUMP AROUND
DETAILS ON SHEETS D1 AND D2).
2. HARVEST MATERIAL FROM THE BOTTOM OF THE EXISTING CHANNEL TO BE PLACED IN
THE BOTTOM OF THE PROPOSED CHANNEL. THIS SHALL INCLUDE THE SURFACE MATERIAL
AND UP TO ONE (1) FOOT BELOW.
3. FILL EXISTING CHANNEL ON THE SAME WORKING DAY AS COMPLETING THE PROPOSED
CHANNEL. IN NO EVENT SHALL THE EXISTING CHANNEL BE FILLED PRIOR TO THE
COMPLETE CONSTRUCTION OF THE CORRESPONDING PROPOSED CHANNEL.
4. ANY EXCAVATED MATERIAL CONTAINING BRICK IS NOT SUTABLE MATERIAL FOR CHANNEL
FILL AND MUST BE DISPOSED OF OFFSITE UNLESS OTHERWISE DIRECTED BY OWNER.
5. IN ANY SECTION WHERE THE NEW CHANNEL ALIGNMENT CROSSES THE EXISTING
CHANNEL A CLAY PLUG WILL BE INSTALLED IN THE EXISTING CHANNEL AS PER DETAIL
ON SHEET D2.
6. THE PROPOSED CHANNEL BANKS SHALL BE STABILIZED WITH COIR FIBER MATTING AND
TEMPORARY SEEDING UPON COMPLETION OF EACH SECTION (REFER TO SHEET D1).
7. COMPLETE ALL EARTHWORK, STRUCTURE INSTALLATION, AND STABILIZATION IN THE PUMP
AROUND AREA.
8. AT A MINIMUM, 20 -FOOT LENGTHS OF EXISTING CHANNEL SHOULD BE FILLED EVERY
50 -FEET OR AS DIRECTED BY THE ENGINEER.
9. COMPLETE ALL SITE WORK INCLUDING PLANTING AND REMOVE ALL SILT FENCE WITHIN
PUMP AROUND AREA. HALT ANY FURTHER ACCESS IN THIS AREA BY HEAVY EQUIPMENT.
10. CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY ENGINEER UPON DISCOVERY OF ANY CONSTRAINS
DISCOVERED IN THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE PROPOSED CHANNEL.
DIAENTEMMCE PLAN
lilt
GRAPHIC SCALE
50 0 25 50 100
1 inch = 50 ft.
TOTAL DISTURBED AREA = 5.8 ACRES
1. ALL EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PRACTICES WILL BE CHECKED FOR STABILITY AND OPERATION FOLLOWING EVERY
RUNOFF - PRODUCING RAINFALL BUT IN NO CASE LESS THAN ONCE EVERY WEEK. ANY NEEDED REPAIRS WILL BE MADE
IMMEDIATELY TO MAINTAIN ALL PRACTICES AS DESIGNED.
2. SEDIMENT WILL BE REMOVED FROM BEHIND THE SEDIMENT FENCES WHEN IT BECOMES APPROXIMATELY SIX (6) INCHES DEEP
AT THE FENCE. THE SEDIMENT FENCE WILL BE REPAIRED AS NECESSARY TO MAINTAIN A BARRIER. ALL SEEDED AREAS WILL BE
FERTILIZED, RESEEDED AS NECESSARY, AND MULCHED ACCORDING TO SPECIFICATIONS IN THE VEGETATIVE PLAN. BECAUSE THE
GOAL OF THE RESTORATION IS TO ESTABLISH A SELF MAINTAINING VEGETATED CORRIDOR, MAINTENANCE SHOULD BE MINIMAL.
PRELIMINARY DRAWING - NOT RELEASED FOR CONSTRUCTION
0) E
W w
z °
U
w
E-
8 � o
" z Lz
L-
v, W a LM d'
a
.� O ■ A
W � A "•
W
p
H P2 3,
O o W E''
z
o z a�
;� d = uo
m
w In
C,2 Cm
W d
W o
c�
z
w
z
O
5
a a
F
zA
z
d w z
�-+ a �Z> a
�
wz�
d
x
z�z
CQ
W x
woa
Q ESA
a
L
z
0
a
z
O
V 0
0 U
a
a
zz
0
U
Q 0
0
�D
� U �
w
AQ
V�
Qa
U
PROJECT N0. DKU -8010
FILENAME: DKU8010 -EC,`1
DESIGNED BY:
ANG
DRAWN BY: AN G
SCALE: 1 " =50'
DATE: 10-26-2012
SHEET N0.
EC -1
E���
HARDWOOD TREE
PINE TREE
TREE REMOVAL
CONSTRUCTION SEQUENCE AND EROSION & SEDIMENT CONTROL
MOBII.I7 kIlON AND EROSION AND SEDDIENT CONTROL
1. ESTABLISH CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE (SHEET D1) AND STAGING AREA. LIMIT TREE REMOVAL TO THE MINIMUM
EXTENT POSSIBLE.
2. LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE SHALL BE MARKED BY SILT FENCE OR ORANGE TREE PROTECTION FENCE (SHEET D2).
3. USE THE AREA DESIGNATED ON THE PLANS FOR ALL STAGING ACTIVITIES RELATED TO THE PROJECT.
4. PARK ALL CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT, INCLUDING TRUCKS AND HEAVY EQUIPMENT WITHIN THE LIMITS OF
DISTURBANCE.
5. CONTRACTOR TO UTILIZE TEMPORARY STREAM CROSSINGS FOR ACCESS.
6. INSTALL SILT FENCE FOR STAGING AND STOCKPILE AREAS (SHEET D1).
7. SILT FENCE WITH 6' SUPPORT SPACING OR WITH WIRE BACKING SHALL BE INSTALLED AROUND THE DOWNSLOPE
PERIMETER OF ALL SOIL STOCKPILE AREAS.
8. LARGE SPECIMEN TREES THAT HAVE BEEN FLAGGED SHOULD BE AVOIDED TO THE GREATEST EXTENT POSSIBLE.
9. COMPLETE ALL PLANTING.
10. STABILIZE ALL DISTURBED AREAS. REMOVE STAGING AREA AND CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE.
11. DEMOBILIZE ALL EQUIPMENT AND MATERIALS FROM SITE.
SM PREPARATION: CLEARING. AND SOIL SUBSOIL EXCAVATION
1. ALL SHRUBS AND SMALL TREES DESIGNATED BY THE ENGINEER WILL BE SAVED FOR TRANSPLANTING. PLANTS
THAT ARE TO BE TRANSPLANTED WILL BE MARKED WITH HIGHLY VISIBLE TAPE.
2. CONTRACTOR SHALL MANAGE EXCAVATED TOPSOIL SEPARATELY FROM EXCAVATED SUBSOIL. EXCAVATED TOPSOIL
SHALL BE PLACED WITHIN THE DESIGNATED TEMPORARY STOCKPILE AREAS AWAY FROM THE CHANNEL TO BE
FILLED (SEE PLANS). TOPSOIL SHALL BE FREE OF STONES OVER 1" IN DIAMETER, ROOTS, STICKS, RUBBISH,
STIFF CLAY, AND EXTRANEOUS MATTER.
3. EXCAVATED SUBSOIL SHALL BE PLACED NEAR THE CHANNEL TO BE FILLED. ONCE THE NEW STREAM IS
CONSTRUCTED, SUBSOIL SHALL BE USED TO FILL THE EXISTING CHANNEL FIRST, THEN STOCKPILED TOPSOIL
SHALL BE USED FOR THE FINAL 6 INCHES OF FILL.
4. IF FILL MATERIAL IS REQUIRED, IT SHALL BE FREE OF DEBRIS AND MEET THE FOLLOWING GRADATION TESTED IN
ACCORDANCE WITH ASTM D -422
SIEVE SIZE PERCENT PASSING
2 INCH 100
1 INCH 90 -100
j INCH 60 -90
NO. 40 0 -60
NO. 200 0 -35
PLASTICITY INDEX (PI) < 15 AND LIQUID LIMIT <40 PER ASTM D -4318.
THE MAXIMUM AGGREGATE SIZE SHALL BE LIMITED TO INCH
FILL MATERIAL MAY BE SITE - EXCAVATED SOILS WHERE T HE ABOVE REQUIREMENTS CAN
BE MET. UNSUITABLE SOILS FOR BACKFILL (HIGH PLASTIC CLAYS OR ORGANIC SOILS) SHALL NOT BE USED
IN THE BACKFILL OR IN THE REINFORCED SOIL MASS. VISUAL OBSERVATION SHALL BE SUFFICIENT FOR THE
APPROVAL OF SITE - EXCAVATED SOILS.
6. IMPORTED TOSOIL SHALL HAVE A LOAMY TEXTURE AND HAVE SAND, SILT, AND CLAY PERCENTAGES THAT MEET
THE U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICUTLTURE CHARACTERISTICS OF A LOAMY SOIL. ORGANIC CONTENT SHALL NOT BE
LESS THAN 1.5% BY WIEGHT. PH RANGE SHALL BE FROM 6 -7.5. IF PH IS LESS THAN 6, LIME SHALL BE ADDED.
SOLUBLE SALTS SHALL NOT EXCEED 50OPPM. IMPROTED TOPSOIL SHALL BE FREE OF DEBRIS, ROOTS, PLANTS,
STICKS, RUBBISH, STIFF CLAYS, AND STONES OVER 1 INCH IN DIAMETER.
1. INSTALL PUMP AROUND ALONG 200' TO 300' OF STREAM CHANNEL, OR NO MORE THAN
CAN BE CONSTRUCTED IN ONE (1) WORKING DAY (DEWATERING AND PUMP AROUND
DETAILS ON SHEETS D1 AND D2).
2. HARVEST MATERIAL FROM THE BOTTOM OF THE EXISTING CHANNEL TO BE PLACED IN
THE BOTTOM OF THE PROPOSED CHANNEL. THIS SHALL INCLUDE THE SURFACE MATERIAL
AND UP TO ONE (1) FOOT BELOW.
3. FILL EXISTING CHANNEL ON THE SAME WORKING DAY AS COMPLETING THE PROPOSED
CHANNEL. IN NO EVENT SHALL THE EXISTING CHANNEL BE FILLED PRIOR TO THE
COMPLETE CONSTRUCTION OF THE CORRESPONDING PROPOSED CHANNEL.
4. ANY EXCAVATED MATERIAL CONTAINING BRICK IS NOT SUTABLE MATERIAL FOR CHANNEL
FILL AND MUST BE DISPOSED OF OFFSITE UNLESS OTHERWISE DIRECTED BY OWNER.
5. IN ANY SECTION WHERE THE NEW CHANNEL ALIGNMENT CROSSES THE EXISTING
CHANNEL A CLAY PLUG WILL BE INSTALLED IN THE EXISTING CHANNEL AS PER DETAIL
ON SHEET D2.
6. THE PROPOSED CHANNEL BANKS SHALL BE STABILIZED WITH COIR FIBER MATTING AND
TEMPORARY SEEDING UPON COMPLETION OF EACH SECTION (REFER TO SHEET D1).
7. COMPLETE ALL EARTHWORK, STRUCTURE INSTALLATION, AND STABILIZATION IN THE PUMP
AROUND AREA.
8. AT A MINIMUM, 20 -FOOT LENGTHS OF EXISTING CHANNEL SHOULD BE FILLED EVERY
50 -FEET OR AS DIRECTED BY THE ENGINEER.
9. COMPLETE ALL SITE WORK INCLUDING PLANTING AND REMOVE ALL SILT FENCE WITHIN
PUMP AROUND AREA. HALT ANY FURTHER ACCESS IN THIS AREA BY HEAVY EQUIPMENT.
10. CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY ENGINEER UPON DISCOVERY OF ANY CONSTRAINS
DISCOVERED IN THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE PROPOSED CHANNEL.
DIAENTEMMCE PLAN
lilt
GRAPHIC SCALE
50 0 25 50 100
1 inch = 50 ft.
TOTAL DISTURBED AREA = 5.8 ACRES
1. ALL EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PRACTICES WILL BE CHECKED FOR STABILITY AND OPERATION FOLLOWING EVERY
RUNOFF - PRODUCING RAINFALL BUT IN NO CASE LESS THAN ONCE EVERY WEEK. ANY NEEDED REPAIRS WILL BE MADE
IMMEDIATELY TO MAINTAIN ALL PRACTICES AS DESIGNED.
2. SEDIMENT WILL BE REMOVED FROM BEHIND THE SEDIMENT FENCES WHEN IT BECOMES APPROXIMATELY SIX (6) INCHES DEEP
AT THE FENCE. THE SEDIMENT FENCE WILL BE REPAIRED AS NECESSARY TO MAINTAIN A BARRIER. ALL SEEDED AREAS WILL BE
FERTILIZED, RESEEDED AS NECESSARY, AND MULCHED ACCORDING TO SPECIFICATIONS IN THE VEGETATIVE PLAN. BECAUSE THE
GOAL OF THE RESTORATION IS TO ESTABLISH A SELF MAINTAINING VEGETATED CORRIDOR, MAINTENANCE SHOULD BE MINIMAL.
PRELIMINARY DRAWING - NOT RELEASED FOR CONSTRUCTION
0) E
W w
z °
U
w
E-
8 � o
" z Lz
L-
v, W a LM d'
a
.� O ■ A
W � A "•
W
p
H P2 3,
O o W E''
z
o z a�
;� d = uo
m
w In
C,2 Cm
W d
W o
c�
z
w
z
O
5
a a
F
zA
z
d w z
�-+ a �Z> a
�
wz�
d
x
z�z
CQ
W x
woa
Q ESA
a
L
z
0
a
z
O
V 0
0 U
a
a
zz
0
U
Q 0
0
�D
� U �
w
AQ
V�
Qa
U
PROJECT N0. DKU -8010
FILENAME: DKU8010 -EC,`1
DESIGNED BY:
ANG
DRAWN BY: AN G
SCALE: 1 " =50'
DATE: 10-26-2012
SHEET N0.
EC -1
E���