The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About20120107 Ver 1_Year 5 Monitoring Report Ph II_2017_20170815PotashCorp® PotashCorp -Aurora Helping Nature Provide Federal Express August 11, 2017 Mr. Tom Steffens U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Washington Regulatory Field Office 2407 West 5h Street Washington, North Carolina 27889 Dear Mr. Steffens: Enclosed is the P and U Lands mitigation site Phase 2 (Year 5) monitoring report for this 2017 monitoring year. The entire report, including all text, tables, figures and appendices, as well as the 2017 well data tables, are located on the CD which accompanies the report. Planting in Phase 2 was complete in March 2013. This report was completed early this year in order to get the 5b year tree density data in time to plan for any adaptive management work before the end of the year. An adaptive management plan is being developed to address high water levels and low tree densities, and will be coordinated with you and DWR before implementation. If you have any questions, please call me at (252) 322-8249, or Julia Berger of CZR Incorporated at (910) 392-9253. Sincerely, Q* Jeffrey C. Furness Senior Scientist Enclosure PC: Mac Haupt, DWR - Raleigh w/encl. Anthony Scarbraugh, DWR — Wash. w/ encl. S. Cooper, CZR w/encl. 23-11-020 w/encl. 1530 NC Hwy 306 South, Aurora, NC USA 27806 T (252) 322-4111 PotashCorp. I www.potashcorp.com FIFTH ANNUAL (2017) AND SUMMARY MONITORING REPORT FOR THE P AND U LANDS RESTORATION SITE PHASE 2 RICHLAND TOWNSHIP BEAUFORT COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA Phase 2 r Prepared for: PCS Phosphate Company, Inc. Prepared by: CZR Incorporated August 2017 FIFTH ANNUAL (2017) REPORT FOR THE P AND U LANDS RESTORATION SITE PHASE 2 RICHLAND TOWNSHIP BEAUFORT COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA Prepared for: PCS Phosphate Company, Inc. Prepared by: CZR Incorporated August 2017 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 PROJECT OVERVIEW ...................... 1.1 History ................................................ 1.2 Location .............................................. 1.3 Goals and Performance Criteria......... 2.0 REQUIREMENTS .............................. 2.1 Normal Rainfall and Growing Season 2.2 Hydrology ........................................... 2.3 Vegetation .......................................... 2.4 Photographic Documentation ............. 2.5. Reporting ............................................ 3.0 2017 RESULTS ................................. 3.1 Rainfall ............................................... 3.2 Hydrology ........................................... 3.3 Vegetation .......................................... 3.4 Photographic Documentation ............. 4.0 SUMMARY ........................................ LITERATURE CITED .......................................... Cover Photos: Top photo: Aerial photo taken on 26 April 2013 over the western portion of Phase 2. Bottom photo: Aerial photo taken on 11 March 2017 over the western portion of Phase 2. LIST OF TABLES Table 1 P and U Lands Phase 2 performance criteria, methods summary, and current LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1 Vicinity Map P and U Lands Phase 2 and Rodman Control Figure 2 Monitoring Locations P and U Lands Phase 2 and Rodman Control Figure 3 Soils P and U Lands Phase 2 and Rodman Control Figure 4 P and U Lands Phase2 and Rodman Monitoring Well Locations on As -Built LiDAR Figure 5 2017 Bay City and WETS -Aurora Rainfall January -June Figure 6 P and U Lands Phase 2 and Rodman Longest 2017 Hydroperiods and Estimated Hydrologic Zones Excluding WETS Above Normal Rainfall Figure 7 P and U Lands Phase 2 and Rodman Longest 2017 Hydroperiods and Estimated Hydrologic Zones During All Rainfall Conditions APPENDICES Appendix A Stem Counts at Individual Plots at P and U Lands Restoration Site Phase 2 Appendix B Selected Fifth Annual Restoration Photographs NOTE: Copy of entire report and hydrology data from monitoring wells included on accompanying CD. P and U Lands Restoration Site Phase 2 iii PCS Phosphate Company, Inc. Fifth Annual Monitoring and Summary Report August 2017 status.......................................................................................................................... T-1 Table 2 Hydroperiods of 49 non -riparian monitoring wells at P and U Lands Phase 2 restoration site, three Rodman control wells, and four Bay City control wells during WETS normal and below normal rainfall......................................................... T-2 Table 3 Hydroperiods of 49 non -riparian monitoring wells at P and U Lands Phase 2 restoration site, three Rodman control wells, and four Bay City control wells independent of WETS thresholds............................................................................... T-7 Table 4 Fifth annual (summer 2017) survival of trees and shrubs planted in 48 0.3 -acre plots at P and U Lands Phase 2............................................................................... T-11 Table 5 Woody volunteer vegetation..................................................................................... T-13 Table 6 Planted and woody wetland volunteer density......................................................... T-14 Table 7 WETS rainfall 2014-2017......................................................................................... T-15 Table 8a Summary hydroperiods WETs normal rainfall.......................................................... T-16 Table 8b Summary hydroperiods all rainfall............................................................................ T-19 LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1 Vicinity Map P and U Lands Phase 2 and Rodman Control Figure 2 Monitoring Locations P and U Lands Phase 2 and Rodman Control Figure 3 Soils P and U Lands Phase 2 and Rodman Control Figure 4 P and U Lands Phase2 and Rodman Monitoring Well Locations on As -Built LiDAR Figure 5 2017 Bay City and WETS -Aurora Rainfall January -June Figure 6 P and U Lands Phase 2 and Rodman Longest 2017 Hydroperiods and Estimated Hydrologic Zones Excluding WETS Above Normal Rainfall Figure 7 P and U Lands Phase 2 and Rodman Longest 2017 Hydroperiods and Estimated Hydrologic Zones During All Rainfall Conditions APPENDICES Appendix A Stem Counts at Individual Plots at P and U Lands Restoration Site Phase 2 Appendix B Selected Fifth Annual Restoration Photographs NOTE: Copy of entire report and hydrology data from monitoring wells included on accompanying CD. P and U Lands Restoration Site Phase 2 iii PCS Phosphate Company, Inc. Fifth Annual Monitoring and Summary Report August 2017 1.0 PROJECT OVERVIEW 1.1 History. The approximately 3,667 -acre P and U Lands restoration site is part of the PCS Phosphate Company Inc.'s (PCS) compensatory mitigation to offset unavoidable impacts to wetlands and waters authorized under United States Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) Action ID: 200110096 and North Carolina Division of Water Quality (DWQ) Water Quality Certification (WQC) #2008-0868 version 2.0. As described in the mitigation plan prepared for the pre -construction notification (PCN) to the USACE (CZR 2012), the site is to be constructed in three phases as shown on Figure 1. Wet conditions delayed construction in —138 acres of Phase 3; these acres were planted in 2015, will be monitored as Phase 4, and will be one year behind the remainder of the previously described Phase 3 area. This annual report concerns fifth annual monitoring of the 1,089 acres of Phase 2 of the P Lands portion, conducted by CZR Incorporated (CZR) of Wilmington, NC. (The P and U designation have no special meaning other than that was the historic label given to PCS and Weyerhaeuser properties with similar ownership agreements.) The design team consisted of Jonathan T. Ricketts, Inc. of Palm Beach Gardens, FL, the restoration design engineer, PCS, and CZR. Earthwork was performed by Sawyer's Land Developing, Inc. out of Belhaven, NC and supervised by the design team. Phase 1 and 2 restoration activities occurred September 2011 -March 2013. Construction of Phase 2 was authorized by five NC Division of Land Resources Erosion and Sediment Control permits for land clearing which were subsequently modified for the construction of the interior ditch plugs and perimeter berms and ditches. Planting of Phase 2 occurred March 2013. Further details of construction are included in the as built, first, and second annual reports (CZR 2014a, CZR 2014b, and CZR 2015). The P and U Lands site is a key component linking PCS Phosphate Company, Inc.'s (PCS) Parker Farm Mitigation Site, Bay City Farm Mitigation Site, Gum Run Mitigation Site, and the South Creek Corridor into a large and varied collection of restored wetland and preserved natural areas (South Creek Corridor Complex). The headwaters and upper valley of historic Gum Swamp Run, a tributary to South Creek, will also be restored as part of the P and U Lands mitigation site in Phase 3. Unlike most other PCS mitigation sites, the P and U Lands are not prior -converted agricultural fields. Other than the existing roads, all of Phase 2 acreage in which earthwork occurred was in some stage of silvicultural activity, usually various -aged pine stands, and contained regularly spaced ditches (deeper than the agricultural ditches on other restoration sites that were filled in as part of restoration work) and the bedding common to pine plantations. The removal of all standing timber and stumps and post-harvest debris presented particular challenges as the organic soils precluded safe burning of the timber slash on site. 1.2 Location. The P and U Lands site is located east and west of Bay City Road (SR 1002), approximately 4.5 miles southeast of Aurora, Richland Township, North Carolina. Bay City Road runs through the P Lands portion of the site, which is bounded on the east by SR 1918 (Peele Road is the unpaved extension of SR 1918) and on the south by "County Line Road" (a gated gravel road that functions as the Beaufort/Pamlico County border). The U Lands portion of the site lies west and southwest of Bay City Farm (the western portion of the P Lands site referred to as the "panhandle" separates Bay City Farm from the U Lands site). South Creek and the South Creek Canal form the northern and northwestern boundaries, Bonner/Rodman Road forms the western boundary, and the Pamlico/Beaufort County line forms the southern boundary of the U Lands (County Line Road itself is the southern boundary of only the eastern half of the U Lands as the western limit of County Line Road terminates at the midpoint of the south property line). The entire site is accessed via multiple gated roads along Bay City Road, Peele Road, County Line Road, and/or Jaime/Executive Road. The site is located within the Pamlico Hydrologic Unit 03020104 of the Tar -Pamlico River basin within the South Creek subbasin at P and U Lands Restoration Site Phase 2 1 PCS Phosphate Company, Inc. Fifth Annual Monitoring and Summary Report August 2017 latitude 35.233831 and longitude 76.775742. Portions of the site can be found on the USGS Aurora, Bayboro, South Creek, and Vandemere quadrangles (Figure 1). 1.3 Goals and Performance Criteria. The primary goal of the entire project is to re- establish a self-sustaining functional wetland complex to allow surface flow to move through vegetated wetlands before reaching any stream. Mitigation yields are estimated and performance criteria are described for the project in detail in the Compensatory Mitigation Plan for P and U Lands Restoration Site (CZR 2012). Performance criteria for Phase 2 are summarized in Table 1. Over time the 1,089 -acre Phase 2 portion of the site is expected to successfully re-establish approximately: 40 wetland acres of headwater forest, 562 wetland acres of non-riverine swamp forest, 135 wetland acres of hardwood flat forest, and 25 acres of open water in plugged ditches. The remaining 34 acres are comprised of existing roads, perimeter berms, and other man -dominated areas. Approximately 25,131 linear feet of jurisdictional waters in roadside ditches and canals have been plugged in order to increase the hydroperiods within the adjacent planted areas (these plugged jurisdictional ditches and canals are included in the 25 acres of reestablished open water). 2.0 REQUIREMENTS 2.1 Normal Rainfall and Growing Season. A continuous electronic rain gauge on the adjacent Bay City Mitigation Site is downloaded once a month and its data are used in conjunction with data from nearby automated weather stations (e.g., NRCS WETS data from NOAA's site at Aurora and rain gauges at other nearby monitoring sites) to determine normal rainfall during the monitoring period. Bay City data were compared to the WETS range of normal precipitation to determine if Bay City rainfall was within the normal range. The range of normal precipitation for this report refers to the 30th and 70th percentile thresholds of the probability of having onsite rainfall amounts less than or higher than those thresholds. The range of normal and the 30 -day rolling total data lines begin on the last day of each month and the 2017 Aurora monthly precipitation total is plotted on the last day of each month (this report includes only the first six months of 2017). Under the 2010 regional guidance from the Corps of Engineers for wetland hydroperiods, the normal growing season for Beaufort County is 28 February to 6 December or 282 days (WETS table for Beaufort County first/last freeze date 28 degrees F 50 percent probability) (US Army Corps of Engineers 2010). At the suggestion of the Corps' Washington regulatory field office, data collected between 1 February and 27 February provide important information related to analyses of site hydrology during the early growing season, but are not part of the hydroperiod calculation for success. 2.2 Hydrology. Figure 2 depicts the locations of hydrology monitoring equipment, Figure 3 shows the locations on Beaufort County soil polygons, and Figure 4 shows monitoring locations on the as -built LiDAR. To document surface storage and hydroperiods of all wetland types on the site, 49 semi -continuous electronic LevelTroll water level monitoring wells (manufactured by InSitu) are deployed at a density of approximately 1 well/15 acres across all planted areas of Phase 2, with the exception of one well that was installed near a ditch to be used in conjunction with a nearby well to monitor lateral drainage effects from the open perimeter ditch. Exclosures constructed of barbed wire wrapped around metal fence posts were built around all wells to reduce likelihood of disturbance or equipment loss by black bears. Three wells were installed 13 March 2013 in a recently timbered tract west of Rodman Road in the Ponzer soil P and U Lands Restoration Site Phase 2 2 PCS Phosphate Company, Inc. Fifth Annual Monitoring and Summary Report August 2017 series as controls for the P and U Lands wells in the same soil type (Rodman Control Site, Figures 2 and 3). Additionally, four wells at the Bay City Mitigation Site were monitored for three or four years (depending on well) in conjunction with Phase 2 wells to use for comparison. Electronic wells collect data every 1.5 hours, are downloaded once a month, and the data evaluated on an annual basis to document wetland hydroperiods. Wetland hydroperiods are calculated by counting consecutive days with water level no deeper than 12 inches below the soil surface during the growing season during WETS normal or below normal rainfall and then for all rainfall conditions. Review of hydrology data in 2017 ended June 13 so that data could be evaluated for this report. Monitoring wells are still deployed and downloaded regularly, but the data are not included in this report. 2.3 Vegetation. The first annual survey of the 48 0.3 -acre planted tree and shrub monitoring plots occurred July -September 2013. The second annual survey occurred October and November 2014, the third annual survey August -October 2015, the fourth survey October and November 2016, and the fifth survey June and July 2017. During the 2017 survey, volunteer woody vegetation was also counted in each plot. The plots represent 2 percent of the restoration area (Figure 2). Due to their quick growth, the Corps determined that three tree species have the possibility to outcompete young planted hardwoods at a mitigation site and need to be monitored as nuisance species to ensure they do not outcompete the preferred species. The three species considered nuisance are loblolly pine (Pinus taeda), red maple (Acer rubrum), and sweetgum (Liquidambar styraciflua). Nuisance monitoring plots (1 meter square) were established in 2014 at the upper corner opposite the well (along the long axis of the plot) in all tree plots and all woody stems taller than 1 foot were counted and identified in 2014 and 2015; results showed no nuisance remediation was necessary. 2.4 Photographic Documentation. Six permanent photo point locations were established along the perimeter of the restoration area (Figure 2). The first annual photos were taken on 24 October 2013, second annual photos were taken on 23 October 2014, third annual were taken in December 2015, fourth annual photos were taken in October 2016, and fifth annual photos were taken in July 2017. 2.5. Reporting. Annual monitoring reports required per the P and U Lands mitigation plan (CZR 2012) have been prepared and submitted to regulatory agencies each year following yearly monitoring (CZR 2014a, 2014b, 2015-2017). 3.0 2017 RESULTS 3.1 Rainfall. Total rainfall from 1 January -14 June 2017 at Bay City was 19.8 inches. The 30 -day rolling total for this period of Bay City rainfall was considered above normal WETS rainfall from 26 April to 23 May (Figure 5). Wetland hydroperiods were calculated regardless of rainfall and also with the above normal rainfall period excluded. The US Drought Monitor (http://droughtmonitor.unl.edu) provides a synthesis of multiple indices and reflects the consensus of federal and academic scientists on regional conditions on a weekly basis (updated each Thursday). In 2017, all weeks through June were considered normal with no drought status in the vicinity of the P and U Lands project area. 3.2 Hydrology. All wells exhibited wetland hydroperiods from 2013 to 13 June 2017 (Tables 2 and 3, Figures 6 and 7). When the WETS above normal rainfall period (26 April -23 May) is excluded, three wells recorded a wetland hydroperiod >6 to 12.5 percent of the growing season, and the remaining 46 wells recorded a wetland hydroperiod >12.5 to 25 percent of the P and U Lands Restoration Site Phase 2 3 PCS Phosphate Company, Inc. Fifth Annual Monitoring and Summary Report August 2017 growing season (Table 2, Figure 6). Review of 2017 hydrology data ended June 13 but by using the full 282 days to calculate wetland hydroperiods, they could not be longer than 20.2 percent. Independent of WETS thresholds, three wells recorded a wetland hydroperiod >6 to 12.5 percent of the growing season, one recorded a wetland hydroperiod >12.5 to 25 percent of the growing season and the remaining 45 wells recorded a wetland hydroperiod >25 to 75 percent of the growing season (Table 3, Figure 7). Again, review of 2017 hydrology data ended June 13, but by using the full 282 days to calculate wetland hydroperiods, they could not be longer than 37.9 percent. Many wells were still recording wetland water levels when data review ended, so it is likely the hydroperiods would be longer if the data were reviewed later in the year. The percentages increase if only 106 days (28 February-13June) are used for hydroperiod calculation. Additionally, all wells recorded wetland water levels for more days than those counted consecutively for wetland hydroperiods. The reference wells in the Rodman Control Site recorded water levels similar to Phase 2 wells (Tables 2 and 3, Figures 6 and 7). Two of the Bay City wells recorded wetland hydroperiods similar to most of the Phase 2 wells, but two recorded shorter wetland hydroperiods that were similar to only three of the Phase 2 wells (PUM 61, 67, and 90). Tables depicting 2017 daily well readings and rainfall are included on a companion CD with this report. 3.3 Vegetation. By using only the number of planted stems that were unquestionably alive in the monitoring plots, the most conservative estimate of survival is presented. Many stems were not found or appeared dead or questionable, but based on prior monitoring experience, a stem needs to appear dead (or not be found) for two survey events before it can be confidently counted as dead. Appendix A contains the number of stems that were alive in each plot for the fall 2017 survey. Overall survival of trees that were unquestionably alive in the 48 plots from the time of planting to the fifth annual survey in 2017 was 59 percent, with a corresponding density of 214 trees per acre (Table 4). If trees with uncertain survival status are included with trees that were definitely alive, survival increases to 64 percent and a density of 235 trees per acre. Excluding unknown species/uncertain survivals, sycamore (Plantanus occidentalis), laurel oak (Quercus laurifolia), cherrybark oak (Q. pagoda), and willow oak (Q. phellos) had the lowest survival of the 21 species (Table 4). Eight of the remaining known species had survivals of 80 percent and higher, with pond cypress (Taxodium ascendens) at 100 percent. Overall survival of shrubs that were unquestionably alive from the time of planting to the fifth annual survey was 63 percent with a corresponding density of seven shrubs per acre (Table 4). Including shrubs with uncertain survival status with shrubs that were definitely alive did not increase survival. Spicebush (Lindera benzoin) and honey cup (Zenobia pulverulenta) had the lowest survival of the 10 species with 20 and 0 percent, respectively. Buttonbush (Cephalanthus occidentalis), winterberry (Ilex verticillata), Virginia sweetspire (Itea virginica), and possumhaw (Viburnum nudum) had the highest survival with 100, 71, 79, and 86 percent, respectively (Table 4). Phase 2 is divided into three community types: headwater forest, non-riverine swamp forest, and hardwood flat. Survival of all zones was similar: 50, 47, and 48 percent, respectively. After combining the planted trees and shrubs that were definitely alive, density increases to 221 stems per acre and if stems with uncertain survival are added, the density increases to 242 stems per acre. Plots with low stem survival are spread throughout Phase 2 and are not concentrated in any particular area of the site. No correlation can be made between low stem survival and soil series, water depth, or ponding duration. Volunteer woody vegetation in the 48 plots was also counted in the 2017 survey. All volunteer woody stems taller than 1 foot were counted, but those with upland status or considered a nuisance species, were excluded from density calculations. A total 3,781 stems of 24 tree and shrub species were identified as woody volunteers and of those, 1,450 stems of 19 P and U Lands Restoration Site Phase 2 4 PCS Phosphate Company, Inc. Fifth Annual Monitoring and Summary Report August 2017 species are considered non -nuisance wetland species (Table 5). The density of non -nuisance wetland trees was 59 stems per acre, the density of non -nuisance wetland shrubs was 42 stems per acre, and the total density of non -nuisance wetland stems was 101 stems per acre. After adding the volunteer tree stems to the planted tree stems, the tree density is 273 stems, which is above the required 260 stems per acre for success (Table 6). Furthermore, after adding volunteer tree and shrub stems to the planted tree and shrub stems, density increases even more to a total of 322 wetland tree and shrub stems per acre. The volunteer stems enhance the diversity of the site because some of the volunteer species were not the same species that were planted. However, the performance criteria calls for 260 stems per acre of 5 -year old planted stems, which was not achieved. Therefore, an adaptive management plan is being developed separately to address the issue. 3.4 Photographic Documentation. A few photos representative of 2017 conditions are included with this report (Appendix B). More are available upon request. C K11MV1 Ji I ►vi /_1:x'1 According to WETS rainfall calculations, Bay City rainfall was normal or below normal WETS rainfall except for 26 April to 23 May. There have been several periods of above normal WETS rainfall over the monitoring years (Table 7). Post -restoration wetland hydrology monitoring for success officially began in 2013. All wells exhibited wetland hydroperiods from 2013 to 2017. During periods of WETS normal or below normal rainfall in 2017, most wells (46 of 49) had a wetland hydroperiod for >12.5 percent to 25 percent of the growing season. The wetland hydroperiods at the other three wells were 11 and 12 percent. Review of data ended 13 June, but hydroperiods calculations mentioned above used the entire 282 -day growing season, and so if review continued, hydroperiods might lengthen. However, by June 2017, all wells had met the hydrology success criteria. Wetland hydroperiods during WETS normal and below normal rainfall periods and those during the entire growing season regardless of rainfall were evaluated separately. Hydroperiods for all monitoring years were also evaluated taking into account two drought indices: the Palmer Drought Severity Index (PDSI) and the Palmer Hydrological Drought Index (PHDI) (Tables 8a,b). Even though some of the years included a few weeks of drought status according to the US Drought Monitor, no year from 2013 to 2016 was assigned a yearly drought status -all years were either near normal or some level of above normal. The consecutively wet years might have contributed to the low survival of stems at the site. According to the US Drought Monitor in 2017, all weeks through June were considered normal in the vicinity of the P and U Lands project area. Overall survival of trees that were unquestionably alive in the 48 plots from the time of planting to the fifth annual survey was 59 percent, with a corresponding density of 214 trees per acre. Overall survival of shrubs that were unquestionably alive from the time of planting to the fifth annual fall survey was 63 percent with a corresponding density of seven shrubs per acre. After combining the trees and shrubs that were definitely alive, density increases to 221 stems per acre and if stems with uncertain survival are added, the density increases to 242 stems per acre. The planted tree density is below to the 260 stems required for success. Currently, plans are being made to address mortality and appropriate adaptive management steps will be coordinated with permitting agencies. However, when volunteer woody wetland tree stems are added to the planted tree stems, the density increases to 273 tree stems per acre and is above the required 260 stems per acre for success. Additionally, after the addition of volunteer wetland tree and shrub stems to the planted tree and shrub stems, density increases further to a total of 322 wetland stems per acre. P and U Lands Restoration Site Phase 2 5 PCS Phosphate Company, Inc. Fifth Annual Monitoring and Summary Report August 2017 LITERATURE CITED CZR Incorporated. 2012. Compensatory Mitigation Plan for P and U Lands Restoration Site. CZR Incorporated. 2014a. As -Built Report for the P and U Lands Restoration Site Phase 2. CZR Incorporated. 2014b. First Annual Report for the P and U Lands Restoration Site Phase 2. CZR Incorporated. 2015. Second Annual Report for the P and U Lands Restoration Site Phase 2. CZR Incorporated. 2016. Third Annual Report for the P and U Lands Restoration Site Phase 2. CZR Incorporated. 2017. Fourth Annual Report for the P and U Lands Restoration Site Phase 2. Kirby, Robert M. 1995. The soil survey of Beaufort County, North Carolina. Natural Resources Conservation Service, USDA. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. 2002. Regulatory guidance letter (RGL) 02-02. Guidance on Compensatory mitigation projects for aquatic resource impacts under the Corps regulatory program pursuant to Section 404 of the Clean Water Act and Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. 2005. Technical Standard for Water -Table Monitoring of Potential Wetland Sites. WRAP Technical Notes Collection (ERDC TN -WRAP -05-2). U.S. Army Engineer Research and Development Center, Vicksburg, MS U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. 2008. Regulatory Guidance Letter (RGL) 08-03. Minimum monitoring requirements for compensatory mitigation projects involving the restoration, establishment, and/or enhancement of aquatic resources. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. 2010. Regional supplement to the Corps of Engineers wetland delineation manual: Atlantic and Gulf coastal plain region. Version 2.0. J.S. Wakeley, R.W. Lichvar, and C.V. Noble, eds. ERCD/EL TR -08-30, Vicksburg, MS. P and U Lands Restoration Site Phase 2 6 PCS Phosphate Company, Inc. Fifth Annual Monitoring and Summary Report August 2017 0 O N O L a) E O L U U C O E v A M > m c 0 C — a ami '> 3 - A- c-0 0 c a) o m -2 O,-0 0 c 3N -000 C.� oN o 0 C H—> O v� (LE n 0 U— n 0 0 W LO a) O 0 U n5 � 0 N Q N a) M O 0) N Q 0) � —O L rn� ° E 3 cD E v 0—� C 0 °C) a3) a) 0 3 N C) E a) a) C6 0 'O C�> a)> V" a) 0) CA O Q O 0) M -O 0— N O- C Q T :E- C L (U0 � -0 L O O L? C) (9 O E VOi O (9 `� O '0 C d .0 C O C; C 0)-5 -0 r� N a) .� C L O "0 N 0 U 0E -0 O -O M Qa) 0- •� -0 a U C U C (n "0 U X N Q.L.. a) X O N 0 T 0 a)� �j, 0) U a) 0- O C E L N L a) C U) O H — C V) LL = 0 00 (U N _ 0 +S+ C O ca 0 N 0 Z O CO06 O y a) C N O L a O E Q O 0 O a cc (� Q a) C Cn O CU V) 7 0 L 0) O a) 0 +S+ O i C C06 N U O 0) U E OcU6 a O LO u) E a) -p L O O L a) Lp O 0 0 0 E a) ++ •� O U 0 7 T ,� p 0 't � O I_ o L-2 OO a ceM L)n I Ala c 0 a E 0 d Q H (n _ E -0 -0 E�0"m�' W L N O O 0) a) c w. a)i m m ate) C(n a) Q C ami E O b U N (6 U 0 C > C > -0 E ca O_ '- a) C L .> C O '� O C d in T O w U 0 >> U) Q m E-0.>_'� m f9 ,0 N> 0 O 0 (a C tp Q U) C N tp � O N CO > 6 U 0> O E O C0. C a) N � as E ° w 3 . r, O �, Z N E O O a) N a) a) (n > ti a) En 'a 4 C '>_ E rn L L (6 U O O N O O _ U) 04 r-�C C CA L O > . C N N N O O (6 P and U Lands Restoration Site Phase 2 T-1 PCS Phosphate Company, Inc. Fifth Annual Monitoring and Summary Report August 2017 5gE 99$ §Ga 2 §ƒ/ 4>& E%5. �=aa 9%t2 \/\/ CO \�)= a#gCO O\\t *�� a 2 } / n �o=o \ $� E/E\ 7-$/ ±§E a) 0) _&&}/ ®Q� \ \ ! / wb7= )�§-0 �\»7 a) co LL ƒ f .2@ :9 8 ==§o CL_. =<E6 7R5f \\</ m=\£ %§:o !�=z =2;[ \@#{ =05= §§\_ Eno= .ro- E M r $j/§ »f(\ 0 >' \5g2 /E/\ \@: LL fE/� /$/ /\]§ P P and U Lands Reston !a an Si! Phase 2 2 PCS Phosphate Company, Inc. Fifth annum Monitoring and Summary Report August 2017 \ ! \ o \ ( \ ƒ a x x x x x x x x A _ LO. x x / 9 _ % §(D /7/{a)� c 7 m- 9 9 = _ 9 9 9 ) E E_ E_ } 2 2 \ } \ } 2 2 2 o 2 2 c - = ƒ�2 _£ /�_: k > f E 6 ) =&om \ / / / / / \ R / / {2f§m y ° \ 3 3 \ 3 \ j C\1 \ 3 ° \ � \ / j 2 @ \ # } # § « § « § # § \ ® $ # } # a M 2 f$$ ® \ ® \ $ ® \ $ 4$ ® N \ f G a \ a \ > 6 r 6 c& m& e o& m> e e a r e a r e a r /);@ {ft3 ,0 # w+ w+ w+ a o w+# w= w+ w+ a !± CO z% z % LO = a z % CO o o % z % - (n U \\(n\ \5 \ \ \ \ J / / / 4 / ? r / / /e\± /\2\ ,00 f}LL j ) % \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ ®o; ƒ/2 , a Cl) # m m w = _ / § § 7 § � Z) i i i i 0- P P and U Lands Reston !a an Si! Phase 2 2 PCS Phosphate Company, Inc. Fifth annum Monitoring and Summary Report August 2017 P and U Lands Restoration Site Phase 2 T-3 PCS Phosphate Company, Inc. Fifth Annual Monitoring and Summary Report August 2017 0 A LO LO a� n 0 N o U U7 N p in X X X X X X X X X X O N 'O T n 0 U? N O nl v v c n .4 CO 0 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 U QCO MM U) U) M U) M U) M U) M U) M U) M V) M V) M U) p O O .p O N _ d p O 8 O O C6 C -O O N N N N N N N N N N NO N U 2 O O O O O O O O O O oo 2 O (U N N N N N N N N N N N a -a C\1 ZT T L U-) t U7 t U') t M t U) t U) t U') t M U') t M U7 t M U7 t M N N N (6 NNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNN N O > C > O p� CU t t t t t t t t t t O U 3= Q U7 N U7 N U-) N U-) N U-) N U7 N U) N U-) N Cf) N U-) N U N UT C N � 00N U 3 N > Q > C= -0 � > a p CO CSS p7 t t t t t t t t t t 00 CO M CO CO CO CO W CD CO N N 7LL 00N Un O Q `o 3 Li N O U N N N N N N N n N N N 3 Q) o s CU N M U) Cfl r-- 00 O O d d d d d d d d d d P and U Lands Restoration Site Phase 2 T-3 PCS Phosphate Company, Inc. Fifth Annual Monitoring and Summary Report August 2017 O Lq X X X X X X X X X X X X O N '0 n T 0 Ln N X M nl v v 0 0 O >'C6 O .� CO 0) 10 � 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 N 00 00 00 U QM M Cl) Cl) CO M M M M M O M M M p O O .p O) Ln Ln Lr) LO LO LO LO LO N LO LO U') N _ d 0 O � O O O N Q N O) p 0 A N N N N N N N N > C N LO O N N N O2 N o oo O N O N O N O N O N O N O N O N O N LO O N O N O N a � N O N t a� n t t t t t t O U 3= Q LO N c p LO N L(j In N Ln N Ln N In N In N M LSi N T L o C N � 0 00 U N U 3 N t l0 t l0 t LO t lf) t lf) t lf) t M_ M O Lq X X X X X X X X X X X X O N '0 n T 0 Ln N X M nl v v 0 0 O >'C6 O .� CO 0) 10 � 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 N 00 00 00 U QM M Cl) Cl) CO M M M M M O M M M p O O .p O) Ln Ln Lr) LO LO LO LO LO N LO LO U') N _ d 0 O � O O O N Q N O) p t t t t W W N N N O d M O 0- P P and U Lands Restoration Site Phase 2 T-4 PCS Phosphate Company, Inc. Fifth Annual Monitoring and Summary Report August 2017 - -O .p N OU N N N N N N N N > C N N O N N N O2 N o oo O N O N O N O N O N O N O N O N O N O N O N O N O N a � N O N t + + t t t t t t O U 3= Q LO N LO N LO N L(j In N Ln N Ln N In N In N M LSi N T L C N � 0 00 U 3 N t l0 t l0 t LO t lf) t lf) t lf) t M_ M lf) + lf) t Uf t M Ln LO t N N N N N N N N N t N _M N _M N CO t p 8 7 00 00 007 1- N N 03 00 N 00 N 00 N 00 N 00 N 00 N 00 N N w N M 00 N 00 N 00 N N N N Z?5 N N N Z?5 N N N Z?5 N N N N N N N �-) N N N �-) N N N �) N N N �-) M N N N -L�5 N N N N N N i?5 t t t t W W N N N O d M O 0- P P and U Lands Restoration Site Phase 2 T-4 PCS Phosphate Company, Inc. Fifth Annual Monitoring and Summary Report August 2017 N > C N 03 C t + + t t t t t t O U 3= Q LO N LO N LO N L(j In N Ln N Ln N In N In N M LSi N C N � 0 00 U 3 N N > Q >CU C > pCOt t t t t t t t CO t p 8 7 00 00 007 1- N N E LL U N O Q `o 3 Li N O U N r N r N N N N N N N r N r N 3 Q) o s Co M N 00 M 00 7 00 U') 00 O 00 h 00 CO 00 O 00 O O O d d d d d d d d d d d t t t t W W N N N O d M O 0- P P and U Lands Restoration Site Phase 2 T-4 PCS Phosphate Company, Inc. Fifth Annual Monitoring and Summary Report August 2017 P and U Lands Restoration Site Phase 2 T-5 PCS Phosphate Company, Inc. Fifth Annual Monitoring and Summary Report August 2017 0 A LO LO a� n 0 N o U U7 N 0 Lq x x x x x x x x x x x x x O N O T n 0 U7 N O nl v v c O � Tt6 � n .4 CO 0 co 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 Q (0 Cl) LO Cl) U') Cl) LO CO LO CO LO cli LO cri LO cri LO cli U') ri U') ri U') ri V') M LO 0 0 0 .� �— a 0 0 0 c -O N N N N N N N N N N N N N N OO N U 0 O O O O O O O O O O O O 0 00 O O N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N a � N O T L U'j t U'j t M U') t M M t M U) t M U7 t M U') t M U') t M U7 t M U7 t M U') t M U) t M U) NM N N N N N N N N N N N N N 0000 N N 00 N 00 N 00 N N 00 N N 00 N N 00 N N 00 N N 00 N 00 N 00 N w N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N > C > O� t t t t t t t t t t t t rl- O U 3= Q U7 N U7 N U-) N U-) N U-) N U7 N U) N U-) N U) N U-) N U-) N U) N U) O N UT C N � 0 00 U 3 N N > Q > C. -0 > a CO `O7 t t t t t t t t t t t t O (B O O CO CO CO CO CO CO CO CO CO CO 7 N N LL 00N Un O Q `o 3 Li N O U N N N N N N N N N N N N N 3 Q) o s CU (0 r-- 00 � O O O N O CO O O U') O CO O � � >_ D 0- D 0- D 0- D 0- D 0- 0- a a a a a a a P and U Lands Restoration Site Phase 2 T-5 PCS Phosphate Company, Inc. Fifth Annual Monitoring and Summary Report August 2017 N O N O Cl) V V CO CO CO M U') N O N LON CO V N N N LO �I�I�I IVI N N N w in 0 rco- 0 U C N M j P and U Lands Restoration Site Phase 2 T-6 Fifth Annual Monitoring and Summary Report 0 U N A N O A in az w C 0 0 =o CD LO c -O a) O h LO M Q) n N 0 a) O N C N a5 3 C o UU U U') N 00 CO M 0 ui X X X O N 7 � t � T A a) CU N 0 M Lq COt N r LO N E c6 O O nl N � � C o c � L a) N v C O `m 0 C o `O 3 a C o N 7 O T CU � O T o a n CO ns 00 00 00 PCS Phosphate Company, Inc. U QM O� p O O ,C O) M 11) M 11) M o — 7 d 0 O � O O O T O) C 'O p C 0 N N N a) U O CD OL O O a) O N O N O N a N O N T L N l0 M N l0 t N M LO CO N (6 N N N N N N N N N M N > C N �2 t - j 3 0 s LO N UO N U') N N a) N U- C: a) 00 U 3 N a) Q > C a5 o M r M M 3 s 7 N N E w 00N U 3 0 3 Li CV I-- O N O U N N N 3 a) o o s Co O 00 O M O o a a a N O N O Cl) V V CO CO CO M U') N O N LON CO V N N N LO �I�I�I IVI N N N w in 0 rco- 0 U C N M j P and U Lands Restoration Site Phase 2 T-6 Fifth Annual Monitoring and Summary Report X U N N N O C in az w C 0 0 =o CD 0 U c -O a) O h O M N N 0 a) O N � a5 3 C U UU U7 M N U 00 CO M CO m C O U X U a) 3 a`) t O C az w C 0 =o CD 0 U M 117 -O a) O 0 7 N N 0 a) O N � a5 3 C a3 U7 M N a) 3 00 7 N N C C O U a) E 7 � t � N O a) CU N M COt N r LO E c6 O w a) CU C N � � C o c � L a) N E C 0 C O `m `O 3 a a 23 � O T o a m N PCS Phosphate Company, Inc. August 2017 %fes � » \ \ \ \ \#7 /) \ 0 \�f -/k 2 CO 0M 0 o m O#a& �=gt \ _ % /f\� 0 75 § e z k \}kcn ) o = \§�\ ƒ \(0 f*=5 £777 a> 0 \5#e § \ / \ 0 m b m E _ ^ ) E ( 0- -0 E�� kk\7 25,\\ =6±$ 00 \ \ a E / 7 § 7 3 ] / k 2 [-2 ®} 2 @ cno= g = o ® \ ) cLLU£ / % E e = - $ / / _[ k3M \�2\ o @ _ _ \f/$ \g/2 0§2± %gf2 a=oe -a/ T- >1 a)(.0 / ) \@77 Ra�LT P and U Lands Reston !a an Si! Phase 2 7 PCS Phosphate Company, Inc. n!h! annum Monitoring and Summary Report August 2017 I \ x x x x x x x x x E § \ G x 0 I y � x x (0 f 0 \ ( >' CO o== n £='=7m— & 0 0 6 f � @ 0 0 0 0 ) E E e = = 2 % \ \ \ % / % \ \ \ \ = 0 0 C) / / c£ � /%�y== f $E \ .� o w o o # # CO =_= o ) E E 00 / M 2 \ \ \ \ \ 2 \ \ \ \ \ ƒ0/C140� � C) r a c % o r ° \ \ Z-6 Z-6 # \ \ \ \ \ ƒ Z-25 Z-25 Z-25 Z25 #2 a \\ a 4 A a 2 a a a a a A \ d � � \ 4 \ \ d A \ \ � %/o= ƒf k\ CO k \ \ CO Q $ \ \ / q \ / $ CO % q \ \ \ \ ®& \ ^ ^ 2 U) e LL \\\\ %/°° 2�0 _ @ n / � \ \ \ M \ 0 k \ \ \ \ \ / E LL /\2\ M o = ± §w w w w w w w w w w w w {/\ a a a s a R a a a a a a //O _ CO G % 2 7 f $ % 2 E F& Nr - 2 2 5 5 > 2 5 2 2 5 5 2 4 = 2 = = 2 2 = 2 = _ _ E I E E I I E I E E E i P and U Lands Reston !a an Si! Phase 2 7 PCS Phosphate Company, Inc. n!h! annum Monitoring and Summary Report August 2017 0 Ln A 0 LO r X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X LO N A 0 LO N N_ A 0 N X CO Al O V N O O � O70 Cn6 , O >' C� .L CO O M U O O O O O O O O OO O O O O O O N O O) O Q O 0) O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O N O O O O O O O O O O aj L N p � O O _ O O 00 O O O O O O O O O O O M O O O O O O CO U 0 O O 00 M M M M M CO CO CO CO CO CO N CO CO CO CO CO N N O T L t t t t t t t t t t t t t t t LO t CO M M M M M M M M M M CO M M M M M CO CO CO CO CO CO CO CO CO CO CO CO CO CO CO CO CU N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N M CO >C -O O Z3 L -0 � > O O CO t t t t t t t t t t t t t t t t L O CO CO CO CO CO CO CO CO CO CO CO I-- CO CO CO CO CO U O O O O O O O O O O O Il- O O O O O M N O N r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r LL C N U � a� > > O D > Q) N M t t t t t t t t t t t t t t t t CO CO CO CO CO CO CO CO CO CO CO w CO CO CO c0 Co LL N CN U 3 L L c6 O LL � N � L N O I� O H N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N O N > O CO 0 N M 'IT LO CO CO M O N M LO CO I-- CO M O d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d al P and U Lands Restoration Site Phase 2 T-8 PCS Phosphate Company, Inc. Fifth Annual Monitoring and Summary Report August 2017 0 LO r- n 0 LO x x X X x X X X X X X X X X X X x x x LO N A 0 LO N N_ A 0 N CO Al (D V N O O � O70 W O >' C6 , .L CO N MLO O O O O O O O O O O O O O O CO O O Ln O O) O O_ t0 Lr) O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O N O O O O L C O O O O r p � O O O C 00 . O O O O O Cfl Cfl Cfl Cfl Cfl Cfl CO (D (D CO CO Cfl 0 U Q NO O M M M M M M M M M M M ti M M O O M L O N M M M M M M M M M M M M M M N MM N _0N O T L + M + M + M + M + M + M + M + M + M + M + MM CO + + M + M + M + M LO M C, � 7 r (9 Cfl Cfl CO (9 (9 CO CO CO CO CO CO C\O CO CO CDLf) CL 00 Cb Cb Cb Cb 0� 0� 0� 0� 0� 0� 0� 0� 0� 0� 00 00 Cb 00 N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N LC CO > C -O +0 Z3 a) L -0 � > O O CO + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + L O (9 (9 (9 CO CO CO CO CO CO Cfl Cfl Cfl Cfl Cfl r- CO CO O d UO O N O O O O O O O O O O O O O O r- O O CO C' N O N N LL C N 0 � a� > > C O D N N N CO + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + It V (D(D (D (D (D CO CO CO CO (D (D CO CO CO Cl) Cfl CD 3 O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O M O O C) LL E N � U L L c6 O � N � LN O I� ti ti O N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N O N O 0 N _ M M M M M M CO M O O O N O CO O -t O LO O (D O `r p CO O N � _ O D_ d d d d d d d d P and U Lands Restoration Site Phase 2 T-9 PCS Phosphate Company, Inc. Fifth Annual Monitoring and Summary Report August 2017 n!h! annum Monitoring and Summary Report PCS Phosphate Company, Inc. August 2017 \ \ \ \ x x x x x E A § \ 0 \ 2 C14 A _ I— 8-0 $ & x x / Al7 0 v / = m 0 >' CU f$ 7\$/ @ n e @ @ g S // / E p / / % \ % / / k _ - 0 0 0 _ =a = 0 \ 5�=»c= 5 f S 7\ g o n g g R e g o\ / / } \ \ \ 2 \ 2 0 / Cl) m ƒ�6�� 0 � ® \ / \ \ / Q / $ \ — c a a a / $ / i-25 \ CO CO \ - 0 & & & \ R \ / / \ o { 23/\ \ / ° n + $ .\ \ 2 / ± % % % Cl) / A \ CU U° 0 } % / 0 \ \ f .@ %§\± 2 Cl) 70 0 \\\} \ 7 / $ G C) \ +\ \ / -0 / / \(�\ cj L) C14 _0 k( # o = 0 0 }/� \2 7 a \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ f§0 �7 2 %3\ 7 a 7 = 7 7 e= \ 2 ® 0 ° \ \ & CO 7 \ / / ƒ \ ƒ ) \ \ M 0 m § § § CIO P and U Lands Reston !a an Si! Phase 2 ]O n!h! annum Monitoring and Summary Report PCS Phosphate Company, Inc. August 2017 O O O N O�2 �2 O O N M LO O N N N LO O V VO (O O h Cl) O 0 0 (0 N 7 M f- r- V M LO t} 0) V O V 0) 0) N l0 M N M (O � M 00 CO �tO M O N I- O O M O Lf) O 00 I- LO N LO M M M V (O Cl) M 00 LO M O-t� O N M O O 00 M O C) (O 00 M 4 LO co Cl) V (O V N N I- M N V O O O) O M 00 N O O M V N O M M O Cn N N _ I� O l0 OC)O M M O O S O r r� O^ M CO LO Cl) (OM (O Cl) y C' N N V M M M't M L� V M O O LO LM ((O LOO CMO O O O N——— O M Nc0 CO M N OLO O M O—— O I" Cl) O O NM V LO CO _ _ Lo O V) CO O M Cl) M 00 Lr)� "T M L e - LO (O M N LO r--('7 M _ M M LO O O N M r V LO LO 00 00 V LO � 00 M M (O N CO V LO r (O V r 't LO O M M Ln Ln r (D h E .O U (6 N d. 2)N V E NCO i• � CO O E h L6 7 0) M U O O jCO L 7 N ` O CO O en Cn NN O O O Y O 0 _ OO_ OLN QO Q O aO_ O- T OUN_ O E E °c F E o a a� a) CO QC) o m 2 Q m 3> c m> 3 L- o m 3 3 Q) E-) rE _ cn Q C7 w cn U) O cn U a m U) H U) I— co Q) m a ,Q > m m a m � � .ti ami a Q) d CUi Q s;• '� N k y N E ip t y P and U Lands Restoration Site Phase 2 T-11 PCS Phosphate Company, Inc. Fifth Annual Monitoring and Summary Report August 2017 ƒ CO) /= Q r$—"t w 2 c , CO w/@& w\ 2 7 w c 5' o w/% p E\ w%± c@' o / = 2M $ — "t 00 / c \ w f = 2 C') N c� c o o— o o=— o § 04 w / c \ w o / § 2 c@ w G 2 m/2—®^ w 5 % o f■ C) o a c c c c c c m=\ § m 2 c 9 w\ c m/ 2/ a 5 \ R 2 CO / w @ m = 2 / — 2 \ \ § (� §(n as �§ p+ �2 ± 2) w Ua) CL ± / \ ) a)2 $ _ \ ] § ° 2 J \ a j \ j \ ° \ \ E > $ k q a = \ / / \ \ \ ƒ } f j ƒ ® \ e / } E 2 k \ \ ! \ \ /Q) E ! \ \ \ a 2 Z3\ f a ; a No \ P and U Lands Reston !a an Si! Phase 2 12 PCS Phosphate Company, Inc. Fifth annum Monitoring and Summary Report August 2017 § (L LU « ] �« K ; U k a ) M k� E E E 3 E / � % �k (L � j � k] ( � E E E 3 E k 2 fN LO CC = CO 2 ; / \ 2 \ _ L _ L _ o2m 4»« / o m 2 a w e r g % w r g/\/ m 3 � _! E \ ! @ 7 4 4 4 e § 4 00 0< o e < < < _ < m LL LLLL LL LU . §! 2 I!{ < /; M c g— \ e / w a e a a4 n r n e e\ 3- � m m m 2 ± ± § / / / \ 2 G � _ _ § \ 2 OE � � « b = m w _ R k Z k ( / » Z 5 § § 2 s/! e e z Uj =03 2 . J§/] j g E F \|��7/%ee� a = _ § § / \ i ? 0 L § § 2 2 \ \ % ) \ § 2f t{zz § , \ § \ \ ) \ k \ \ \ / A2_ M) \ 3 2 # / § ) e 4 m o a A m%> P and U Lands Reston !a an Si! Phase 2 ]a PCS Phosphate Company, Inc. Fifth annum Monitoring and Summary Report August 2017 \ CD \ \ ! ! ; a _ )\72/ @ f M a} % 2 a 3® G o / / \ Cl) k \ E \ / (E2 ] \ j ` E CO f \3\/ƒ0cy \/\//$ < /; M c g— \ e / w a e a a4 n r n e e\ 3- � m m m 2 ± ± § / / / \ 2 G � _ _ § \ 2 OE � � « b = m w _ R k Z k ( / » Z 5 § § 2 s/! e e z Uj =03 2 . J§/] j g E F \|��7/%ee� a = _ § § / \ i ? 0 L § § 2 2 \ \ % ) \ § 2f t{zz § , \ § \ \ ) \ k \ \ \ / A2_ M) \ 3 2 # / § ) e 4 m o a A m%> P and U Lands Reston !a an Si! Phase 2 ]a PCS Phosphate Company, Inc. Fifth annum Monitoring and Summary Report August 2017 Table 6. Fifth annual (summer 2017) survival of trees and shrubs planted in 48 0.3 -acre plots in Phase 2 of PU Lands Restoration Site and volunteer woody wetland stems (taller than 1 ft) counted in those plots in 2017. PLANTED AND VOLUNTEER STEMS Wetland Trees Wetland Shrubs Cou Densi Dens 3,933 297 4,230 273 21 294 701 8 709 49 1 49 Total Wetland Stem Count 4,634 305 4,939 Total Wetland Stem Density 322 21 343 'Survival was considered unsure if the stem appeared dead (brittle, no green, broken, etc.) at the current sampling event and dead if at both the current and last sampling events the stem was not unquestionably alive. 2Total includes alive + unsure. P and U Lands Restoration Site Phase 2 T-14 PCS Phosphate Company, Inc. Fifth Annual Monitoring and Summary Report August 2017 Tagged at Summer 2017 stems baseline Alive Unsure' Tota 12 PLANTED STEMS Planted Trees Count 5,266 3,087 297 3,384 Density 366 214 11 235 Planted Shrubs Count 154 97 8 105 Density 11 7 1 7 Planted Unknown Count 1,327 0 0 0 Total Planted Stems Count 6,747 3,184 305 3,489 Planted Density 14.4ac) 469 221 21 242 -(stems- VOLUNTEER STEMS3 Volunteer Wetland Trees Count 846 846 NA NA Density 59 59 Volunteer Wetland Shrubs Count 604 604 NA NA Density 42 42 Total Volunteer Stems Count 1,450 1----101 1,450 NA NA Density (stems=14.4 ac) 101 PLANTED AND VOLUNTEER STEMS Wetland Trees Wetland Shrubs Cou Densi Dens 3,933 297 4,230 273 21 294 701 8 709 49 1 49 Total Wetland Stem Count 4,634 305 4,939 Total Wetland Stem Density 322 21 343 'Survival was considered unsure if the stem appeared dead (brittle, no green, broken, etc.) at the current sampling event and dead if at both the current and last sampling events the stem was not unquestionably alive. 2Total includes alive + unsure. P and U Lands Restoration Site Phase 2 T-14 PCS Phosphate Company, Inc. Fifth Annual Monitoring and Summary Report August 2017 Table 7. Summary of rainfall recorded at the Bay City Farm rain gauge and PCS Aurora NOAA station 6N over the five monitoring years and periods of each year considered above WETS normal rainfall. Periods of above normal WETS rainfall were not included in hydroperiods used for restoration success criteria. a total through 14 June 2017 b total through 31 May 2017 P and U Lands Restoration Site Phase 2 T-15 PCS Phosphate Company, Inc. Fifth Annual Monitoring and Summary Report August 2017 Annual total Annual total Entire year Monitoring inches rainfall inches rainfall considered within Above WETS normal year recorded at Bay recorded at PCS or below normal periods City rain gauge Aurora NOAA 6N WETS rainfall 2013 43.00 42.61 Yes None 2014 54.00 58.16 No 19 June — 20 July 3 August — 30 August 7 June — 5 July 2015 52.40 63.02 No 2 October — 1 November 18 November — 6 December 4 February — 4 March 7 June — 28 June 2016 60.60 59.92 No 2 July — 5 August 12 September — 2 October 7 October — 5 November 2017 19.80a 18.92b NA 26 April -23 May a total through 14 June 2017 b total through 31 May 2017 P and U Lands Restoration Site Phase 2 T-15 PCS Phosphate Company, Inc. Fifth Annual Monitoring and Summary Report August 2017 ti O N Ln O N O N M 0 N O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O Lf) Lf) u) Lf) u) M M M M M Lf) M Lf) M Lf) M Lf) M Lf) N N N 'It N N N N N N N N N N N N N M O M Cfl M Cfl Ln MNN N N N I -- N N N f -- N M O 6 M M M 6 O M M M M M O M 6 M O M N N N = N == M M M M M N M M M N M M N O M M M M ti ti ti ti. ti M M CO CO N M N �� CO M M M M CO CO CO CO M M N M M M N M N N M M M M M M M M M M M N w Cfl C6 Lf) O Lf) M 'IT 00 00 00 O 00 00 00 M O O N M M O N O) M Lf)00 LO N 't 6) 00 M N L� M O L-- M, -' N CO O Lf) CV N LL) Lf) N N O N N Lf) Lf) UC) U)� M L() Q Q Q Q Q Q o L 0) D > (A N •' E C O C V) Co Yn O N�a�� 00 z 3 O N — Q 00L OL _ O O NMco d' 0) 07 Lo > Qj E O OL NCA -0 M C C L M CU >, J f2 � .E L O X C'6 � N N ai M C — U L a M C L o 0 fo >, c . O � E N +-� (0 7 Z i II 1 > O N Z 2i I I L 2 CO a) CA C >, m O ?� � N Q O a) 0- ' � C __ >, O O t0) a) U f6 a) O C NOCo > fo OL •C " LO Lo O �' O C f>o 0 coJ E O CME +cO O r-0 O o y CO N E O O fo U O II N C O •� p > Z CO a) 7 M C NC Uqq N L U C O O Q Y f23 O L� C•C a)fo co Z L Loo -0 N C N cN6 0 7 N a) ^�O a) Z U 1Co U> C N q- .... C -aSZ U O N C 1J O •� CO L -a O D Y N a) C CL Ln o M O> U — CV L Y M O C\1 C) C L Z3 o a) �-0-0 :M E U C � +.� O I'- � OL C -2 U_ Lf) O a) j +� N U . > O E O (A N a) X U O O N (6 •N OCL a D U O C O -0Q (o N C >, a) L E � LU ��-0 fo fa O C' > a) 11 C E co fo in+�_� >Z m L a� o o N Q 7 -O r p C 0 O fA 0 U N ~ 00 N 2 O CU O O U MZ a) "N >, E H a_ Z� 0 2 0 E L E c ti O N Ln O N O N M 0 N O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O Lf) Lf) u) Lf) u) M M M M M Lf) M Lf) M Lf) M Lf) M Lf) N N N 'It N N N N N N N N N N N N N M O M Cfl M Cfl Ln MNN N N N I -- N N N f -- N M O 6 M M M 6 O M M M M M O M 6 M O M N N N = N == M M M M M N M M M N M M N O M M M M ti ti ti ti. ti M M CO CO N M N �� CO M M M M CO CO CO CO M M N M M M N M N N M M M M M M M M M M M N w Cfl C6 Lf) O Lf) M 'IT 00 00 00 O 00 00 00 M O O N M M O N O) M Lf)00 LO N 't 6) 00 M N L� M O L-- M, -' N CO O Lf) CV N LL) Lf) N N O N N Lf) Lf) UC) U)� M L() Q Q Q Q Q Q P and U Lands Restoration Site Phase 2 T-16 PCS Phosphate Company, Inc. Fifth Annual Monitoring and Summary Report August 2017 N M �t Lf) (0 I,- 00 O O N M 't Lf) (9 I- 00 0) U) P and U Lands Restoration Site Phase 2 T-16 PCS Phosphate Company, Inc. Fifth Annual Monitoring and Summary Report August 2017 s � z p N Z"" O o O o O o O o O o O o O o 0 0 0 0 0 o O O O o O o O L O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O a r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r 3 ° � m 0 _z y Z o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 L OO O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O 0 r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r IL Ix 3 z 0 CO 0 L L 0 L ai x 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 C) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 s = o Q 3 x o Ln LO Ln Ln Ln Ln Ln LO Ln M M M M LO Ln Ln Ln Ln Ln Ln Ln LO Ln LO Ln LO LO 3 ti N N N N N N N N N N O N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N NCDO O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O ' N N N N N N N N N N r N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N to N N N N f-. N N O N LO r I- N N N (N N (N N N N N N N N N Z Z co co CIS Cl) 00 co co 00 00 co It CF) 0) CO M ci M CO M CO co co co co co co co Q Q N M M M M r M M r r M r r N M M M M M M M M M M CO M M CO 2E 2j r— M M r— M cfl f— f— O O ti t— t-- r-- t— r-- tir�, M ti r— r- I-- O Z Z QM M M M4 N M4 N M N N M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M Q Q N M M M M N M M N M M N M M M M CO M CO M CO CO M CO M CO M N 2E 2j 00 'q 00 00 N d7 00 Ln N 00 r N 00 'q 00 00 00 00 00 It It N M 00 M 00 (D Z Z N M M M M N M M N N M M CO M CO M M M M M CO M M M M M M LO r Q Q N r M NLr)r CO M f� N M LC) f� M CO N COM I� _ _ _ N Z Z p 6 CO N N06 00 E r r M 4 6 0 M ti N M Z Z N N CO LC) U) N LO N r LO LO LO M N N N N N O r N M t Ln CO I� M O O r N M;T LO CO f— M M O N M S LO CO M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M 6' O O M 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 a a- a- a- a- a- a - P and U Lands Restoration Site Phase 2 T-17 PCS Phosphate Company, Inc. Fifth Annual Monitoring and Summary Report August 2017 2 0 � o � — /� Q � 0 2 � � C14 4LO q Lf) C14 � q f \ q \ \ I / k / / \ \ / \ \ LO r r @ @ @ \ \ \ @ @ / / CO, » » CO / / / @ @ R 7 / 7 » » » 7 7 \ / / E R R R CL E E / \ / / \ / / 0 / LO r r @ @ @ \ \ \ f 0 9 \ % % @ R R 7 7 7 R R R / / / R » » / % % G G / U U 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 � e � e 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 r r � C) 5 0 Q 4 & E @ Z Z C6 \ ¢ / / k \ \ \ ' / ' ƒ ƒ @» @ \ \ \ ƒ ƒ t n — \ 4 R 4 q $ ± I I U U U U III I § M > % 7 ) # % §U) (j)\ § k /\/ = u o �±) \ \32 k (C)R -a CIJ " 0 \ 22E a 2 = k 5=\ e *_ % o e U) ± 4 f ® £ E E 0 M ° E j } N 0 k 0a) / \ \ /E CO \ |' § M % � 2 R = n — g �/ E U) 3\/ % / f § .5 g= _ 6-- a) E m / E \ � \ 2 M \ ƒ /M / 2 E U) ® o U) k ƒ § f 2 CL / R 0 \ / E ¥ a f 0# 2 E ') / /n\$=\\ P and U Lands Reston !a an Si! Phase 2 ]a PCS Phosphate Company, Inc. n!h! annum Monitoring and Summary Report August 2017 _N C 0 L 0 O 0 (1) U) "' E O C O M Y O O C NO L .� N N O N C M -O (O >, Qj E "O i U) C � L O 06 In_ o CO U C v _ o ">10 m > O >, C •"•' O L E cn co N Z L II > 3 -0Z a) o c0 co a) Cn C >' CO L O NQ .- C - II p = a) U O a) O = > OL E z O U. C. -O N d 00 C > M M co >' c0 _O r O N a)— a) O O CD '= o M C N o o u E o — mUiOZi0 O U O Lam. C Co 'O O a) — > a) r L C O 6 'F C N C U U i U to EO OQ �� CO 2 .� Q Y 0) U) Q� U) O M i 7.0 •( O Z a5 O C > 0a) U a) a) O N -a O M _Q C a) II � L 0) MO N a) C O Z U Z U > N a) `. C CO Q Y U a) C U 3 O w M U CO M O L LSO CO O CO M a� � ME m ami �L� o a) a O O -0 O❑❑ U C C LO (O L r a O N = O > o a) a iv .E O (Uj U) a) a) QO a) O O O O a w O V O C O C "a (O M LO •O > II EE m a 0� Q 7Cf) C �' 0❑ C CO O O L 0 ED aO) C a) M CO 00 N H O Na) O O a) M 4) U (O (O 4) O i� " N >, E O L C >, L (6 O L H a- Z� 0= E° ti O N Co O N Ln O N O N M_ O N O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r Lf) LO Lf) u) Lf) u) Ln LO M LO Ln Lf) LO Lf) LO Lf) Ln Lf) Ln r I- O O�� r CO O M O O O O 0) 0) O 0) O N o0 f- I� M o0 N I,� r-� r-� r-: r--: r-� r--: r-� r--: ti P-: ti r N M M r N r w M M M M M M M M M M M M M M Ln Il- I r S S. Ln M Z Z m M 6 6 O O M L() � S. S — N � LM f) � � � o0 6 O< r M M M N M r N (fl 1 C'') M O M N Cfl a0 M M CO LL) M O r Op r M Z Z N COCO CO M N CO M N N It Cfl Ln CD LO �� It M M 2 2i N Ln CO (fl LL) r O Ln 'IT W Ln a0 M 00 00 N M M L!) I— 4 Cfl 6 CO O 6 N � M h N= N M Ln Nr z z r M N N r r N Cfl CO 't (fl M CO Cfl CO M M O N 00 CO O N O C') L() 00 L() N � CA r Z Z 00 M N I� M C� 0 I- M N CM Cn Ln r N Z Z N Lf) LL) N N N N Ln LO L() Ln It M LL) P and U Lands Restoration Site Phase 2 T-19 PCS Phosphate Company, Inc. Fifth Annual Monitoring and Summary Report August 2017 r N M� Ln Cfl f— M M O r N M� LL) (fl f— M O O O O O O O O O O ti ti ti _ _ U) ❑ P and U Lands Restoration Site Phase 2 T-19 PCS Phosphate Company, Inc. Fifth Annual Monitoring and Summary Report August 2017 t � o N z L Z a 3 ° � m 0 z N Y a 3 z ° � m 0 L L 0 L � x � 0 a = •3 O T O N LO T- Q O N T O N Cl) r O N O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O 7fZ�fZ�fZfZfs�fZfZfZfZfZrfZ�fZrfZ�fZfZ�fZrfZ�fZrfZrfZ�lsrfZ�fZ�fZ�fZ�fZ� Ci) O CS) O M 0 0 0 67 M 0 I M M O M M M M M O M O M O M M : M O CT O O M M O N Z Z C 0 C cyi • 0 (N 'q- Ln M r CO M CD CD 0 0 O�� r 't M w CO CO N CO LO f- CO O 00 Mn Ln O Ln � M M 00 00 r LO O Z Z N Cfl - 4 N O 6 N- N N CO Cfl CO Cfl 6- CO O M Cfl O O 6 Q Q 'IT CO LO qt N M Cfl N CO qt N M CO 't It 't LO 't LO LO M e q qt N 2i 2 - 00 00 N O r In N r r N 00 r r M N COM N 00 00 r 00 Z Z N M N Cfl - CO 6 Cfl M CO V- N M Cl) CM 4 CMN N M N Cfl Q Q CO CO CO N M CO N N CO r M CO CO CO CO CO COM CO CO CO CO r N r M 00 fl- N 00 f� M M N M M I- N Z Z CO CO N N Ll r 00 E r r � M� � � � LSA CO r CO L� N M Z Z N CO Ln Mn N LO N r LO LO LO CO N N N N N O r N M t LOCO Il- M M O r N M S LO(D I-- XM v� v V j V u) w _ M M M M M 00 M 00 M 00 O O O O O O M O O O O O O O O O O P and U Lands Restoration Site Phase 2 T-20 PCS Phosphate Company, Inc. Fifth Annual Monitoring and Summary Report August 2017 S ■ _ � o — /� Q L. � 0 2 � � C14 (D 04 Lf) k � k \ CV) f K \ \ I / k / \ / \ \ / \ / 0 0 LO r r @ R y \ \ \ M Cl?0 "t \ \ \ / \ $ 0 o n / \ / / \ / LO r r ■ ■ @ 0 0 \ \ \ 04 \ / @ R 9 CV) 7 CO q 2 CO CV) / / e � � U) % % N G / U / 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 r r � Q / ' 2 2 rLc) 06 / / \ \ \ ' / ' ƒ ƒ @ »@ Z Z \ \ \ Z Z C'4 n � — \ 4 R 4 q $ ± ± I I U U U U I I I I / L)- -0 ) ( » 0 7 % § U) { § k 2 \ f° 0 3 0 \ k ( 0 Ln R \ / /\/ o ?(D\ e _ M o EM \ U) o=— 7 m 3 ? _ ¥ 3 R = 7 $ E 0) 0 CO c \ * 0 E \ k A"=g }kk / \ E \ E _ / \ |' ( k\J 0 2 R = n g 2\/ E } _§ ) CO \ / § / f § .5 g = (\ '� 2 2 / \ 0 W \ \E�ƒ E = 0 U) _ /) \ƒ : =202 a2 U) CM R k)0//\\ 0& / E ® f 0 # = E ') / / � 2 5 % = A R = . in P and U Lands Reston !a an Si! Phase 2 21 PCS Phosphate Company, Inc. n!h! annum Monitoring and Summary Report August 2017 r; l AURORA r iI y, SOUTH CREEK CORRIDOR. _.. ♦�.� ... ..... ..'n........... ................. ...•�•�' J' P LANDS & 4 SOUTH CREEK 1._ CORRIDOR L A� All Ro.o PHASE 2 PHASE - — - 1 .._717 PHASE 2P LliNDS PHASE BAY CITU [ PHASE 4, CONTROL U LANDS - _ PHASE? PHASE , \ _ P LANDS PARKER FARM - SECTIONS A-J j �� ! LAT: 35'14'15.04" i .. LONG: 76"46'19.20" ,i ..'r ! . RODMAN ' �• - _ CONTROL SITE CASEY TRACT PHASE 4 - --- U LANDS P LANDS U LANDS + 1 •T 1' 1 LEGEND P AND U LANDS BOUNDARY P and U LANDS PHASE 2 0 5,500 11,000 SOUTH CREEK CORRIDOR AND PARKER FARM BOUNDARY SCALE IN FEET VICINITY MAP NORTH CAROLINA P AND U LANDS PHASE 2 AND TWO CONTROL SITES SITE LOCATION PCS PHOSPHATE COMPANY, INC. P LANDS SOURCE: SCALE: AS SHOWN APPROVED BY: DRAWN BY: BFG/TLJ PORTIONS OF THE BOUNDARY PROVIDED BY: ROBERT M. CHILES, P LANDS_VIC_ NEW BERN, NORTH CAROLINA, JOB #2009096, DATED: 11/19/2009 DATE: 10/20/16 FILE- AND 02/02/2010 AND BEAUFORT COUNTY GIS DATA WEBSITE PH2 2016 WWW.CO. BEAU FORTAC. US, BEAUFORT COUNTY PARCEL DATA SHAPEFILES, »E NAD 1983 FEET. 1%6 CP#1745.59.32.2 ddb ' J 4709 COLLEGE ACRESUITEIV2 USGS TOPOGRAPHIC MAP IMAGES, NC STATEPLANE, L NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION WILMINGTON, NORTH CAROLINA 28403 NAD83, FEET, 1:24000—SCALE, WEBSITE: WWW.NCDOT.ORG INCORPORATED TEL 910/392-9253 FIGURE 1 ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS FAX 910/392-9139 J/ SOUTH CREEK CANAL EXECUTIVE ROAD/ JAIME ROAD A� RODMAN RC -1 SITE PHASE 4 RC -2 U LANDS rn Zo RC -3 11Z b PHASE 4 U LANDS O oD U LANDS rn O SOURCE: PORTIONS OF THE BOUNDARY PROVIDED BY: ROBERT M. CHILES, NEW BERN, NORTH CAROLINA, JOB #2009096, DATED: 11/19/2009 AND 02/02/2010 AND BEAUFORT COUNTY GIS DATA WEBSITE WWW.CO.BEAUFORT.NC.US, BEAUFORT COUNTY PARCEL DATA SHAPEFILES, NAD 1983 FEET. BAY CITY FARM BCRW-44 BCRW-29 BAY CITY FARM CONTROL SITE N I BAY CITY No. 2 P LANDS PLPS 12 BENFEWELL ROAD PLPS 13 ,0s 107 108 los 103 1 105 /-1. , 102 PLPS 11 104 ROYAL ROA 96 97 99 PLPS 10 a 0 ®98 1001 PLPS 59 `_� ss 87 P LAND- 92 � 85 83 95 94 g2 88 0 O 4 0 91 90 86 93 0 74 0 76 67 I I 68 ROAD 69 Goo 070 % 0 75! 7 71 SMALL 73 � 7 06Oho02 P LANDS 66 SMALL ROAD PLPS 58 0 BCRW-33 BCRW-17 P LANDS Fel BAY CITY No. 3 COUNTY ROAD BAY CITY No. 1 0 1,800 3,600 SCALE IN FEET LEGEND PLPS 7 P LANDS PLANTING AREA OPEN WATER OR PLUGGED/FILLED DITCH - ROADS ® PERIMETER BERM AND PARKING AREAS TREE SAMPLING PLOT O WELL LOCATION AND TREE MONITORING PLOT (WELLS TO MONITOR LATERAL DRAINAGE EFFECT MAY NOT HAVE A TREE PLOT. LOCATIONS ARE APPROXIMATE.) CONTROL WELL PHOTO STATION NUMBER AND LOCATION PLPS 1 AREAS PLANTED IN PHASE 2: 0 ZONE 2 HEADWATER FOREST 0 ZONE 3 NON-RIVERINE SWAMP FOREST 0 ZONE 5 HARDWOOD FLAT 1 o P AND U LANDS PH2 (796.4 ACRES) To BAY CITY FARM 0 WELL LOCATION AND TREE MONITORING PLOT J 4 (WELLS TO MONITOR LATERAL DRAINAGE EFFECT BCW -44 PI{ASE BAY CITY No. MAY NOT HAVE A TREE PLOT. LOCATIONS ARE ASE APPROXIMATE.) O BCW -29 BCW -33 0 CONTROL WELL BAY CITY SOUTH CREEK CANAL FARM SOILS EXECUTIVE ROAD/ Po CONTROL BCW -17 JAIME ROAD SYMBOL SOIL NAME SITE AP ARAPAHOE (MINERAL) (12.7 ACRES) D° DARE (ORGANIC) (0.1 ACRES) R 0 D M A N BAY CITY NO' 3 Po PONZER (ORGANIC) (488.5 ACRES) PO CONTROL Pt PORTSMOUTH (MINERAL) (74.0 ACRES) RC -1 SITE PHASE 4 To TOMOTLEY (MINERAL) (1.9 ACRES) U LANDS Wd WASDA (ORGANIC) (219.2 ACRES) RC -2 rn 20 Q HYDRIC SOILS RC -3 me Zk NOTE: Z ONLY HYDRIC SOILS ARE DESIGNATED MINERAL To UHLANDS C SE 4�' BAY CITY N°• 2 OR ORGANIC. o '• fir. r;• BAY CITY No. 0 1,800 3,600 z', .. - j D L 1 k- .'� T' i ,��;�,,.- e • S!. SCALE IN FEET o SOILS U LANDS D 4•._. o �•��, 'tr,,,;,:;' jr-='.. rs;'�- ,�� - ,, P AND U LANDS PHASE 2 and TWO CONTROL SITES Po TY LINE ROAD SOURCE: PCS PHOSPHATE COMPANY INC. ;rouN = PORTIONS OF THE BOUNDARY PROVIDED BY: ROBERT M. CHIL . , .: T = v NEW BERN, NORTH CAROLINA, JOB #2009096, DATED: 11/19/2009 v D__ — -- '� x.. •4 �. w m AND 02/02/2010 AND BEAUFORT COUNTY GIS DATA WEBSITE WW CO.BEA1983 FORT.NC.US, BEAUFORT COUNTY PARCEL DATA SHAPEFILES, SCALE AS SHOWN APPROVED BY: DRAWN BY: TLJ 70 SOIL SURVEY OF BEAUFORT COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA, US DEPARTMENT DATE: 02/21/17 FILE: PLANDS_SOILS_PH2_ O' OF AGRICULTURE NATURAL RESOURCES CONVERSATION SERVICE,. 2016 D - - - ISSUED: SEPTEMBER 1995 CP# 1745.59.32.2 - - AERIAL IMAGE FROM: NC ONE MAP GEOGRAPHIC DATA, 4709 COLLEGE ACRES DRIVE 2016, NORTH CAROLINA STATE PLANE, NAD1983 FEET, SUITE 2 S •=WE SI�E:WWW.NCMAPONE.COM R ��..•._,� P - Z ■ _ WILMINGTON, NORTH CAROLINA 28403 V_ INCORPORATED TEL 910/392-9253 FIGURE 3 ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS FAX 910/392-9139 i Pt , BENFEWELL ROAD . T. a Pt 08 109 � 106 107 _ Pt 103 102 101 05 104 ROYAL ROAD - - 96 97 99 98 10o 87 P LANDS A Pt 89 F 94 2 91 90 88 85 83 82 F 95 93 84 86 Po lAo Wd 90 To A - 74 76 79 67 69 71 72 73 75 77 78 80 81 68 70 SMALL ROAD 03 Dt Pa Pt65 Dao 63 62 61 66 SMALL ROAD PHA 2 PH � Wd - Y v ti 9sm� �u� !A LEGEND U Pt Pt Z] PHASE3 PHASE 1 o P AND U LANDS PH2 (796.4 ACRES) To BAY CITY FARM 0 WELL LOCATION AND TREE MONITORING PLOT J 4 (WELLS TO MONITOR LATERAL DRAINAGE EFFECT BCW -44 PI{ASE BAY CITY No. MAY NOT HAVE A TREE PLOT. LOCATIONS ARE ASE APPROXIMATE.) O BCW -29 BCW -33 0 CONTROL WELL BAY CITY SOUTH CREEK CANAL FARM SOILS EXECUTIVE ROAD/ Po CONTROL BCW -17 JAIME ROAD SYMBOL SOIL NAME SITE AP ARAPAHOE (MINERAL) (12.7 ACRES) D° DARE (ORGANIC) (0.1 ACRES) R 0 D M A N BAY CITY NO' 3 Po PONZER (ORGANIC) (488.5 ACRES) PO CONTROL Pt PORTSMOUTH (MINERAL) (74.0 ACRES) RC -1 SITE PHASE 4 To TOMOTLEY (MINERAL) (1.9 ACRES) U LANDS Wd WASDA (ORGANIC) (219.2 ACRES) RC -2 rn 20 Q HYDRIC SOILS RC -3 me Zk NOTE: Z ONLY HYDRIC SOILS ARE DESIGNATED MINERAL To UHLANDS C SE 4�' BAY CITY N°• 2 OR ORGANIC. o '• fir. r;• BAY CITY No. 0 1,800 3,600 z', .. - j D L 1 k- .'� T' i ,��;�,,.- e • S!. SCALE IN FEET o SOILS U LANDS D 4•._. o �•��, 'tr,,,;,:;' jr-='.. rs;'�- ,�� - ,, P AND U LANDS PHASE 2 and TWO CONTROL SITES Po TY LINE ROAD SOURCE: PCS PHOSPHATE COMPANY INC. ;rouN = PORTIONS OF THE BOUNDARY PROVIDED BY: ROBERT M. CHIL . , .: T = v NEW BERN, NORTH CAROLINA, JOB #2009096, DATED: 11/19/2009 v D__ — -- '� x.. •4 �. w m AND 02/02/2010 AND BEAUFORT COUNTY GIS DATA WEBSITE WW CO.BEA1983 FORT.NC.US, BEAUFORT COUNTY PARCEL DATA SHAPEFILES, SCALE AS SHOWN APPROVED BY: DRAWN BY: TLJ 70 SOIL SURVEY OF BEAUFORT COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA, US DEPARTMENT DATE: 02/21/17 FILE: PLANDS_SOILS_PH2_ O' OF AGRICULTURE NATURAL RESOURCES CONVERSATION SERVICE,. 2016 D - - - ISSUED: SEPTEMBER 1995 CP# 1745.59.32.2 - - AERIAL IMAGE FROM: NC ONE MAP GEOGRAPHIC DATA, 4709 COLLEGE ACRES DRIVE 2016, NORTH CAROLINA STATE PLANE, NAD1983 FEET, SUITE 2 S •=WE SI�E:WWW.NCMAPONE.COM R ��..•._,� P - Z ■ _ WILMINGTON, NORTH CAROLINA 28403 V_ INCORPORATED TEL 910/392-9253 FIGURE 3 ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS FAX 910/392-9139 # 1 LL BENFEWELL ROAD 109, 4 107 t os ° - ti— e - i q ' � � � 106 � { � � � � � - * i_ ■ ■ 0105 i 3 00 ••i ' ` •• s+ �- ` • J - 010 1 2 � � • r � ' + °RO AL RID _ � 96 097 99 0 _ I' 99 � - i •9� 100 T ti' r _ F P LA D A r 8 8_ • ■ r i4 _ °88 • 85 •' 3 82 86 84, • �O *79 L i 072 e76 1� • o • *� N ° 67 y 9 70 • • 750 i 77 7 81 } • 71 SMALL 73 ROAD • e80 PHAse2 ' � � ' ' � •� Y a _ - PHASE 1 t_ � P ..LANDS + 65 ®3 .•1 , i � • (� Be64® 062 • 1 , i A • =1 6 SMALL ROAD 1 J - y • PHASE 2 ' PHASE 3 T7 O D v i a i i t\n . ,� 9sF _I LEGEND ' PHASE 3 - PHASE 1 PHASE 2 PLANTING AREA B CITY ARM w I � OPEN WATER OR PLUGGED/FILLED DITCH Ar _r t F . }L ROADS - �� BCRW-44 ❑e _ } PHASE 1 g ® PERIMETER BERM AND PARKING AREAS _ • • O ! PHASE 1 + � � WELL LOCATION _29 BCRW-33 - - - CONTROL WELL y BA ITY SOUTH CREEK CANAL , ' R Legend EXECUTIVE ROAD/ _ s 416.. FARM ' BCRW-17❑ P LANDS Elevation in Feet JAIME ROAD + - CONTROL Value 0-2 SITE D2-4 RODMAN 3 -4-6 CONTROL gAY CITY N� =6-6 RC -1 SITE PHASE 4 Q 6 � � � 7-a RC -2 U LANDS o8-9 _ =9-10 ZO ' 10-11 RC -3 �' f1C _ �n-12 Z .ZH 12 -13 O 13-14 PHASE 414-1 - U LANDS N BAY ciTY NO 2 _6 _ 15-16 C Q 16-21 ED Q 21 - 48 z 0 gAY o 0 1,800 3,600 Z D 14k I 'v U c '0 LA N D S P LANDS T SCALE IN FEET o MONITORING WELL LOCATIONS ON AS—BUILT LIDAR 1o COUNTY LINE ROAD P AND U LANDS PHASE 2 and TWO CONTROL SITES PCS PHOSPHATE COMPANY , INC. SOURCE: o SCALE: AS SHOWN APPROVED BY: DRAWN BY: TLJ PORTIONS OF THE BOUNDARY PROVIDED BY: ROBERT M. CHILES, D NEW BERN, NORTH CAROLINA, JOB #2009096, DATED: 11/19/2009 DATE: 02/06/17 FILE; PLANDS_WELL_LIDAR_ p AND 02/02/2010 AND BEAUFORT COUNTY GIS DATA WEBSITE PH2-2016 WWW.CO. BEAU FORT.NC.US, BEAUFORT COUNTY PARCEL DATA SHAPEFIL NAD 1983 FEET. V CP#1745.59.32.2 NORTH CAROLINA FLOODPLAIN MAPPING PROGRAM, BEAUFORT AND%4709 COLLEGE ACRESUTE 2 PAMLICO COUNTIES, LIDAR, NC STATEPLANE, NAD 1983, FEET, `/ L WILMINGTON, NORTH CAROLINA 28403 WWW.NCFLOODMAPS.COM INCORPORATED TEL 910/392-9253 FIGURE 4 ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS FAX 910/392-9139 au E `o � O � L t � O N O — ro H �H J-+ � O +, \� N � O cO O 0 C 1_ � Q f6 U O C L � Q m r -I r -I .N O O O C O O ++ N N u O '� ate+ Q v a O = v � Q Z �l 0 UJ O — CLQ L O O aL-+ U Q bA "O � 4J Q c a0-+ O � N O :2vOi � O U O- O � 4J c0 T r6 � ate-+ 4J O � s U p L to O OL W M T0 uc0 v p O C C fCD � co m O N L O �+ t ci C O 00 I� I 0QC I G ^ C L N � c E O O � � L G J Y Q N N M = 0q M f6 LD- 76 C `r9 on 'FU v yr0 U U U T V) V) CO J rl o ru CD O to 1 tel, 00 tD r1i CD U0 (sayz)ui) Ilejuieb Alyluow pue Allen r0 au U0 O O O —C +.. n• � L L •U LO LOra O v Z ,*,� •� f0 +� O f0 s O 00 � Oro C O -p cQ •� C G 0 N U H O Q 7 ? O t6 C + z� �sQm au LEGEND PHASE 2 PLANTING AREA OPEN WATER OR PLUGGED/FILLED DITCH - ROADS PERIMETER BERM AND PARKING AREAS WELL LOCATION 01 CONTROL WELL SOUTH CREEK CANAL EXECUTIVE ROAD/ JAIME ROAD RODMAN CONTROL RC -1 SITE RC -2\RC -3 PHASE 4 U LANDS 33 D 1090 O z 0107 108+ Z O D M 106 10 103+ 0 100 PHASE 2 U LANDS 05 104+ • o PHASE 3 ROY L ROA O O 96+ 0 D D 0 Z O P D 6�+ 87+ SOURCE: o PORTIONS OF THE BOUNDARY PROVIDED BY: ROBERT M. CHILES, NEW BERN, NORTH CAROLINA, JOB 02009096, DATED: 11/19/2009 0 AND 02/02/2010 AND BEAUFORT COUNTY GIS DATA WEBSITE 88+ 86+ WWW.CO.BEAUFORT.NC.US, BEAUFORT COUNTY PARCEL DATA SHAPEFILES, N NAD 1983 FEET. HYDROLOGIC ZONES WETLAND HYDROPERIODS 0 O = >6 - 12.5 PERCENT OF THE GROWING SEASON O O (24.85 ACRES) _ >12.5 - 25 PERCENT OF THE GROWING SEASON (712.75 ACRES) NOTE: HYDROLOGIC ZONES ARE A VISUAL APPROXIMATION OF TOTAL ACRES REPRESENTED BY WELL HYDROPERIOD CATEGORIES BASED ON ONE WELL PER 15 ACRES, KNOWLEDGE OF SITE CONDITIONS, AND LIDAR CONTOURS. THE ZONES DO NOT REPRESENT ACTUAL HYDROPERIOD BOUNDARIES. REVIEW OF HYDROLOGY DATA ENDED JUNE 13 (BUT MONITORING WELLS ARE STILL RECORDING DATA). A (+) SIGN AT WELLS INDICATES WETLAND HYDROLOGY WAS CONTINUING PAST JUNE 13. II BENFEWELL ROAD 33 D 1090 0107 108+ n 106 10 103+ 0 100 PHASE 2 05 104+ • 102Q+ PHASE 3 ROY L ROA O 96+ 97+ D 90+ 99+10\79+ 0 U P LA D S 6�+ 87+ BAY CITY FARM o 9®+ 85+ 83 095+ 0 ®91 090 88+ 86+ 84 N 93+ 074+ BCRW- 0. PHASE3 J 0 70+ 0 77+ 7 0+ PHASE El MAL 73+ ROAD BRW-29 i BCRW 33 P BAY CITY 65 64+ 03+ 61 0 660 -,KA4LL 062+ o ROAD FARM BCRW 17� CONTROL SITE PHASE 4 U LANDS rn ZO r*1 Z z -� o� N BAY CITY No. 2 P LANDS BAY Co 4 L ROAD COUNTY P LANDS BAY CITY NO. 3 BAY CITY No. 0 1,800 3,600 SCALE IN FEET BENFEWELL ROAD 1090 0107 108+ 106 10 103+ 0 100 05 104+ • 102Q+ ROY L ROA 96+ 97+ 90+ 99+10\79+ P LA D S 6�+ 87+ 94+ 9®+ 85+ 83 095+ ®91 090 88+ 86+ 84 93+ 074+ 76+ 0 67 69+ ,.+ 70+ 72+ 0 70+ 0 77+ 7 0+ BS MAL 73+ ROAD 0 0 P LANDS 65 64+ 03+ 61 0 660 -,KA4LL 062+ o ROAD BAY Co 4 L ROAD COUNTY P LANDS BAY CITY NO. 3 BAY CITY No. 0 1,800 3,600 SCALE IN FEET I LEGEND PHASE 2 PLANTING AREA OPEN WATER OR PLUGGED/FILLED DITCH ® ROADS ® PERIMETER BERM AND PARKING AREAS O WELL LOCATION 1 CONTROL WELLS SOUTH CREEK CANAL EXECUTIVE ROAD/ JAIME ROAD RODMAN CONTROL RC -1 SITE RC -2\RC -3, PHASE 4 U LANDSGI m K O A Z o Z D m v 70 U LANDS v O v D Z A O D v SOURCE: PORTIONS OF THE BOUNDARY PROVIDED BY: ROBERT M. CHILES, NEW BERN, NORTH CAROLINA, JOB 02009096, DATED: 11/19/2009 AND 02/02/2010 AND BEAUFORT COUNTY GIS DATA WEBSITE WWW.CO.BEAUFORT.NC.US, BEAUFORT COUNTY PARCEL DATA SHAPEFILES, NAD 1983 FEET. J� PHASE 4 U LANDS BAY CITY FARM BCRW- 4+L C BRW -29 BAY CITY FARM CONTROL SITE r0 ZO mZ Z {II ro I BAY CITY No. 2 P LANDS BAYo. 4 J 7 P LANDS U --1 BAY CITY No. 3 ROAD COUNTY BAY CITY No. 1 0 1,800 3,600 SCALE IN FEET BENFEWELL ROAD HYDROLOGIC 1090 ZONES WETLAND HYDROPERIODS 0107 100 106 105+ 103+ p 1011+ D 0 104+ D O 25 PERCENT OF THE GROWING SEASON ACRES) 019AL ROAD = >12.5 - (21.21 D O = >25 - 75 PERCENT OF THE GROWING SEASON (667.53 ACRES) 06+ 97+ 0 98+ 99+ 0 100+0 NOTE: 87+ P LA DS 8?+ HYDROLOGIC ZONES ARE A VISUAL APPROXIMATION OF TOTAL ACRES 94+ go+ 0 85+ 0 83+ 82+ F REPRESENTED BY WELL HYDROPERIOD CATEGORIES BASED ON ONE 00 °90 91 0 88+ 86+ 84 0 p WELL PER 15 ACRES, KNOWLEDGE OF SITE CONDITIONS, AND LIDAR 95+ y°3+ O V6 CONTOURS. THE ZONES DO NOT REPRESENT ACTUAL HYDROPERIODe 0 0 BOUNDARIES. e 74+ 76+ 79+ REVIEW OF HYDROLOGY DATA ENDED JUNE 13 (BUT MONITORING WELLS °67 88 069+ 70+ 70+ 72+ 0 70+ 0 0 77+ 70+ 80+ 81+ ARE STILL RECORDING DATA). A (+) SIGN AT WELLS INDICATES WETLAND MAL 73+ ROAD 0 HYDROLOGY WAS CONTINUING PAST JUNE 13. P LANDS 65 64+ 613+ 61 66° o e62+ 0 cAJ II_ ROA PHASE 4 U LANDS BAY CITY FARM BCRW- 4+L C BRW -29 BAY CITY FARM CONTROL SITE r0 ZO mZ Z {II ro I BAY CITY No. 2 P LANDS BAYo. 4 J 7 P LANDS U --1 BAY CITY No. 3 ROAD COUNTY BAY CITY No. 1 0 1,800 3,600 SCALE IN FEET APPENDIX A 2017 (Fifth Annual) Stem Counts at Individual Plots at P and U Lands Restoration Site Phase 2 Appendix A. Individual tree/shrub plot counts from P and U Lands Phase 2 first (2013) and fifth annual (2017) monitoring. Numbers in each column indicate trees unquestionably alive at sampling. Plot size is 0.3 acre. Zone 3 63 Zone 2 104 105 107 108 Total 1 st 5th Common name Scientific name 1st 5th 1st 5th 1st 5th 1st 5th 1st 5th Unknown ? 12 12 Serviceberry Amelanchier canadensis 1 1 1 8 5 2 Red chokeberry Aronia arbutifolia 39 25 26 19 Paw paw Asima triloba 18 20 40 29 1 1 1 4 2 River birch Betula nigra 3 5 1 2 5 6 11 17 17 30 American beautyberry Callicarpa americana 1 Ironwood Carpinus caroliniana 13 1 5 1 4 3 17 6 26 10 Water hickory Carya aquatica 4 2 2 2 1 3 3 3 Sugarberry Celtis laevigata 1 1 1 1 Buttonbush Cephalanthus occidentalis 1 2 3 3 6 3 Atlantic white cedar Chamaecyparis thyoides 2 2 10 10 9 9 7 6 Sweet pepperbush Clethra alnifolia 7 14 20 13 16 15 1 8 7 3 Silky dogwood Cornus amomum 1 1 1 2 4 1 5 1 Swamp dogwood Cornus foemina 1 Titi Cyrilla racemiflora 18 1 1 2 18 2 2 4 3 5 Persimmon Diospora virginiana 15 8 33 23 19 11 31 25 13 8 Strawberry bush Euonymous americana 6 5 4 3 10 2 24 14 Green ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica 23 14 57 20 37 12 6 2 123 48 Deciduous holly Ilex decidua 13 1 10 4 19 18 17 18 Inkberry Ilex glabra 21 20 10 13 10 9 15 17 1 1 Winterberry Ilex verticillata 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 4 3 Virginia sweetspire Itea virginica 2 2 4 4 6 5 10 4 22 15 Swamp doghobble Leucothoe (Eubotrys) racemosa 61 48 116 81 130 71 166 106 113 73 Spicebush Lindera benzoin 1 69 1 Fetterbush Lyonia lucida Sweetbay Magnolia virginiana 8 7 5 4 6 4 2 2 21 17 Mulberry Morus rubra Unknown gum/tupelo Nyssa spp. Water tupelo N. aquatica 1 2 17 14 15 13 33 29 Swamp tupelo Nyssa biflora 6 6 23 24 23 32 3 55 62 Red bay Persea borbonia Pond pine Pinus serotina Sycamore Platanus occidentalis 2 4 6 Oak Quercus spp. 1 1 White oak Q. alba Laurel oak Q. laurifolia Overcup oak Q. lyrata Swamp chestnut oak Q. michauxii 11 1 8 3 9 4 36 8 64 16 Water oak Q. nigra Willow oak Q. phellos Cherrybark oak Quercus pagodaefolia Dwarf azalea Rhododendron atlanticum Swamp azalea Rhododendron viscosum Swamp rose Rosa palustris Pond cypress Taxodium ascendens 34 34 27 26 7 8 68 68 Bald cypress Taxodium distichum American elm Ulmus americana High bush blueberry Vaccinium corymbosum Possumhaw Viburnum nudum 4 1 3 4 4 Dusty zenobia Zenobia pulverulenta TOTALI 98 1 76 1 162 1 99 1 117 1 88 99 48 476 1 311 Zone 3 63 64 65 66 69 70 71 1 st 5th 1 st 5th 1 st 5th 1 st 5th 1 st 5th 1 st 5th 1 st 5th 1 1 1 1 8 5 2 39 25 26 19 22 16 18 20 40 29 1 1 1 4 2 2 2 3 3 1 1 2 3 3 1 4 3 13 6 2 1 3 1 4 2 2 2 1 2 3 1 1 3 3 6 6 8 8 2 2 10 10 9 9 7 6 12 11 14 14 20 13 16 15 1 8 1 3 3 3 1 2 1 2 6 1 18 2 6 2 18 2 5 2 7 1 3 15 8 33 23 19 11 31 25 13 8 4 1 6 5 4 3 10 2 24 14 14 3 9 19 6 7 2 13 9 11 1 21 5 13 1 10 4 19 18 17 18 3 3 21 20 10 13 10 9 15 17 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 1 1 61 48 116 81 130 71 166 106 113 73 79 47 106 69 P and U Lands Restoration Site Phase 2 2017 Fifth Annual Report A-1 Appendix A. (continued) P and U Lands Restoration Site Phase 2 2017 Fifth Annual Report A-2 Zone 3 72 73 74 75 76 77 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 Common name Scientific name 1 st 5th 1 st 5th 1 st 5th 1 st 5th 1 st 5th 1 st 5th 1 st 5th 1 st 5th 1 st 5th 1 st 5th 1 st 5th 1 st 5th 1 st 5th Unknown ? 1 8 3 1 3 4 25 5 Serviceberry Amelanchier canadensis Red chokeberry Aronia arbutifolia Paw paw Asima triloba River birch Betula nigra American beautyberry Callicarpa americana Ironwood Carpinus caroliniana Water hickory Carya aquatica Sugarberry Celtis laevigata Buttonbush" Cephalanthus occidentalis Atlantic white cedar Chamaecyparis thyoides 6 6 6 4 8 4 5 4 35 19 39 31 9 6 4 2 9 4 10 7 22 13 7 7 12 8 Sweet pepperbush Clethra alnifolia 1 Silky dogwood Cornus amomum 1 1 Swamp dogwood Cornus foemina Titi Cyrilla racemiflora Persimmon Diospora virginiana Strawberry bush Euonymous americana Green ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Deciduous holly Ilex decidua Inkberry Ilex glabra Winterberry Ilex verticillata Virginia sweetspire Itea virginica 1 1 Swamp doghobble Leucothoe (Eubotrys) racemosa Spicebush Lindera benzoin 1 Fetterbush Lyonia lucida Sweetbay Magnolia virginiana 1 2 2 1 4 4 1 1 3 3 3 3 1 1 9 9 2 1 5 6 7 7 Mulberry Morus rubra Unknown gum/tupelo Nyssa spp. Water tupelo N. aquatica 11 11 11 10 13 9 18 15 11 7 17 14 13 13 20 20 11 11 15 12 22 22 9 7 25 21 Swamp tupelo Nyssa biflora 2 4 1 1 3 6 5 5 33 30 15 14 10 10 3 2 22 17 13 8 5 8 14 14 5 6 Red bay Persea borbonia 1 1 1 Pond pine Pinus serotina Sycamore Platanus occidentalis Oak Quercus spp. 2 4 4 1 2 1 1 White oak Q. alba Laurel oak Q. laurifolia 2 1 6 4 8 1 2 2 3 9 8 3 3 3 1 7 9 Overcup oak Q. lyrata 22 12 26 9 2 6 1 5 3 12 6 3 2 23 12 3 12 6 4 15 14 Swamp chestnut oak Q. michauxii 22 5 14 1 4 25 2 10 2 8 4 8 3 2 11 1 6 2 8 6 9 8 6 4 Water oak Q. nigra Willow oak Q. phellos 8 5 3 12 1 4 8 5 14 5 6 1 4 3 16 4 Cherrybark oak Quercus pagodaefo/ia Dwarf azalea Rhododendron atlanticum Swamp azalea Rhododendron viscosum Swamp rose Rosa palustris Pond cypress Taxodium ascendens Bald cypress Taxodium distichum 25 31 17 20 19 20 23 24 29 32 10 12 26 29 30 37 14 13 15 17 24 25 24 28 20 21 American elm Ulmus americana High bush blueberry Vaccinium corymbosum 1 1 1 1 1 3 Possumhaw Viburnum nudum Dusty zenobia Zenobia pulverulenta TOTAILI 100 72 99 47 65 40 112 57 122 91 106 82 96 67 84 66 113 58 80 55 133 83 79 74 118 95 P and U Lands Restoration Site Phase 2 2017 Fifth Annual Report A-2 Appendix A. (continued) P and U Lands Restoration Site Phase 2 2017 Fifth Annual Report A-3 Zone 3 86 87 88 89 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 Common name Scientific name 1 st 5th 1 st 5th 1 st 5th 1 st 5th 1 st 5th 1 st 5th 1 st 5th 1 st 5th 1 st 5th 1 st 5th 1 st 5th 1 st 5th 1 st 5th Unknown ? 9 1 2 6 20 11 3 2 Serviceberry Amelanchier canadensis 1 Red chokeberry Aronia arbutifolia 1 3 1 Paw paw Asima triloba River birch Betula nigra American beautyberry Callicarpa americana Ironwood Carpinus caroliniana Water hickory Carya aquatica Sugarberry Celtis laevigata Buttonbush" Cephalanthus occidentalis Atlantic white cedar Chamaecyparis thyoides 2 1 27 11 21 21 22 7 7 1 1 3 2 26 11 68 58 Sweet pepperbush Clethra alnifolia 1 1 1 1 1 1 4 1 Silky dogwood Cornus amomum 1 1 1 Swamp dogwood Cornus foemina Titi Cyrilla racemiflora 1 1 1 1 1 2 5 8 Persimmon Diospora virginiana Strawberry bush Euonymous americana Green ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Deciduous holly Ilex decidua Inkberry Ilex glabra Winterberry Ilex verticillata Virginia sweetspire Itea virginica 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 4 2 3 2 Swamp doghobble Leucothoe (Eubotrys) racemosa Spicebush Lindera benzoin 2 1 Fetterbush Lyonia lucida 2 2 Sweetbay Magnolia virginiana 9 7 5 5 6 5 6 4 7 7 2 1 1 2 2 2 2 5 5 3 3 6 7 Mulberry Morus rubra Unknown gum/tupelo Nyssa spp. 3 Water tupelo N. aquatica 14 16 6 12 4 5 15 19 15 14 10 12 15 14 13 5 19 16 27 30 12 11 11 8 15 14 Swamp tupelo Nyssa biflora 9 9 10 8 5 3 9 6 1 1 4 2 8 11 7 5 3 3 31 28 2 1 14 12 1 Red bay Persea borbonia 1 Pond pine Pinus serotina Sycamore Platanus occidentalis Oak Quercus spp. 13 5 4 18 6 9 4 1 9 White oak Q. alba Laurel oak Q. laurifolia 3 2 2 1 1 10 8 6 3 2 1 8 14 2 13 3 6 1 5 2 Overcup oak Q. lyrata 3 1 6 1 9 1 10 7 7 3 12 10 1 33 20 20 5 2 1 9 7 Swamp chestnut oak Q. michauxii 5 1 1 4 1 12 6 13 18 5 26 2 6 9 34 6 18 19 31 26 Water oak Q. nigra Willow oak Q. phellos 5 2 1 18 4 13 22 8 3 4 1 26 7 8 1 4 1 19 16 Cherrybark oak Quercus pagodaefolia Dwarf azalea Rhododendron atlanticum Swamp azalea Rhododendron viscosum Swamp rose Rosa palustris Pond cypress Taxodium ascendens Bald cypress Taxodium distichum 17 18 11 12 19 20 16 16 9 10 26 29 24 24 51 45 25 26 5 5 22 23 19 19 18 18 American elm Ulmus americana High bush blueberry Vaccinium corymbosum 1 1 1 1 Possumhaw Viburnum nudum 1 1 1 Dusty zenobia Zenobia pulverulenta TOTAILI 86 53 68 46 71 58 113 68 78 41 127 62 127 65 113 55 92 48 174 101 108 51 115 56 190 165 P and U Lands Restoration Site Phase 2 2017 Fifth Annual Report A-3 Appendix A. (continued) Zone 5 61 Zone 3 67 68 102 103 109 Total Common name Scientific name 1st 5th 1st 5th 1st 5th 1st 5th Unknown ? 1 st 5th 17 5th 15 137 Serviceberry Amelanchier canadensis 5 3 1 Red chokeberry Aronia arbutifolia 6 3 1 3 17 10 Paw paw Asima triloba River birch Betula nigra 11 6 1 1 1 American beautyberry Callicarpa americana 1 1 Ironwood Carpinus caroliniana 2 4 Water hickory Carya aquatica 6 4 5 5 3 1 Sugarberry Celtis laevigata 8 2 1 Buttonbush" Cephalanthus occidentalis 2 1 3 1 1 Atlantic white cedar Chamaecyparis thyoides 2 2 6 6 502 344 Sweet pepperbush Clethra alnifolia 3 3 1 3 1 1 21 21 Silky dogwood Cornus amomum 2 3 3 20 6 Swamp dogwood Cornus foemina 2 1 Titi Cyrilla racemiflora 2 1 12 13 45 36 Persimmon Diospora virginiana 2 1 1 Strawberry bush Euonymous americana 1 1 1 1 6 6 Green ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica 9 8 1 1 3 1 4 4 Deciduous holly Ilex decidua 8 4 12 7 14 13 26 20 Inkberry Ilex glabra 5 3 11 14 5 12 2 Winterberry Ilex verticillata 2 5 3 11 2 10 11 11 Virginia sweetspire Itea virginica 4 4 3 3 3 27 28 Swamp doghobble Leucothoe (Eubotrys) racemosa 2 5 Spicebush Lindera benzoin 4 9 1 Fetterbush Lyonia lucida 5 4 1 2 2 Sweetbay Magnolia virginiana 1 1 1 2 3 4 117 110 Mulberry Morus rubra 6 5 6 5 19 21 11 6 Unknown gum/tupelo Nyssa spp. 10 9 7 6 5 2 3 Water tupelo N. aquatica 27 26 27 25 13 12 529 489 Swamp tupelo Nyssa biflora 14 15 6 8 2 4 265 260 Red bay Persea borbonia 5 3 1 15 1 1 4 Pond pine Pinus serotina 10 11 8 8 22 22 3 4 Sycamore Platanus occidentalis 12 12 8 8 2 Oak Quercus spp. 3 1 3 2 95 White oak Q. alba 3 Laurel oak Q. laurifolia 10 3 9 4 1 213 47 Overcup oak Q. lyrata 10 10 6 77 11 9 407 207 Swamp chestnut oak Q. michauxii 20 10 24 13 8 5 468 140 Water oak Q. nigra Willow oak Q. phellos 8 6 7 1 13 3 334 68 Cherrybark oak Quercus pagodaefolia Dwarf azalea Rhododendron atlanticum Swamp azalea Rhododendron viscosum Swamp rose Rosa palustris Pond cypress Taxodium ascendens Bald cypress Taxodium distichum 17 18 1 1 8 8 662 699 American elm Ulmus americana High bush blueberry Vaccinium corymbosum 1 2 1 20 5 Possumhaw Viburnum nudum 1 5 1 6 5 Dusty zenobia Zenobia pulverulenta TOTAILI 122 98 111 61 105 72 3,905 2,482 Zone 5 61 62 67 68 78 90 91 92 1 st 5th 1 st 5th 1 st 5th 1 st 5th 1 st 5th 1 st 5th 1 st 5th 1 st 5th 2 5 3 7 6 3 1 4 4 11 6 1 1 1 1 1 1 5 4 2 6 4 5 5 3 1 4 3 8 2 1 10 1 2 1 3 1 1 1 2 1 1 1 2 1 1 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 6 6 5 3 9 8 1 1 3 1 4 4 2 2 8 4 12 7 14 13 26 20 2 2 5 3 11 14 5 12 2 1 13 2 5 3 11 2 10 11 11 7 11 12 5 1 1 1 2 5 5 4 1 4 10 9 6 2 2 2 1 13 5 7 2 6 5 6 5 19 21 11 6 5 5 10 9 7 6 5 2 6 1 1 3 3 1 20 4 13 1 5 3 15 1 9 2 1 1 10 11 8 8 22 22 3 4 12 12 12 12 8 8 2 3 3 2 1 1 3 32 14 56 49 108 80 114 77 27 31 61 48 73 56 73 36 P and U Lands Restoration Site Phase 2 2017 Fifth Annual Report A-4 Appendix A. (concluded) *Planted but in such a low density, did not show up in plots P and U Lands Restoration Site Phase 2 2017 Fifth Annual Report A-5 Zone 5 Total 1st 5th Common name Scientific name Unknown ? 17 Serviceberry Amelanchier canadensis Red chokeberry Aronia arbutifolia Paw paw Asima triloba River birch Betula nigra American beautyberry Callicarpa americana Ironwood Carpinus caroliniana 10 4 Water hickory Carya aquatica 14 7 Sugarberry Celtis laevigata Buttonbush* Cephalanthus occidentalis Atlantic white cedar Chamaecyparis thyoides 6 7 Sweet pepperbush Clethra alnifolia 26 15 Silky dogwood Cornus amomum 15 4 Swamp dogwood Cornus foemina Titi Cyrilla racemiflora Persimmon Diospora virginiana Strawberry bush Euonymous americana Green ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Deciduous holly Ilex decidua Inkberry Ilex glabra Winterberry Ilex verticillata 3 2 Virginia sweetspire Itea virginica 2 1 Swamp doghobble Leucothoe (Eubotrys) racemosa Spicebush Lindera benzoin 1 Fetterbush Lyonia lucida 4 2 Sweetbay Magnolia virginiana 30 26 Mulberry Morus rubra Unknown gum/tupelo Nyssa spp. Water tupelo N. aquatica 81 75 Swamp tupelo Nyssa biflora 36 68 Red bay Persea borbonia 3 7 Pond pine Pinus serotina Sycamore Platanus occidentalis Oak Quercus spp. 5 White oak Q. alba Laurel oak Q. laurifolia 45 21 Overcup oak Q. lyrata 64 59 Swamp chestnut oak Q. michauxii 6 1 Water oak Q. nigra Willow oak Q. phellos 66 9 Cherrybark oak Quercus pagodaefolia Dwarf azalea Rhododendron atlanticum Swamp azalea Rhododendron viscosum Swamp rose Rosa palustris Pond cypress Taxodium ascendens Bald cypress Taxodium distichum 73 78 American elm Ulmus americana High bush blueberry Vaccinium corymbosum 10 2 Possumhaw Viburnum nudum 3 Dusty zenobia I Zenobia pulverulenta TOTAL 517 391 *Planted but in such a low density, did not show up in plots P and U Lands Restoration Site Phase 2 2017 Fifth Annual Report A-5 APPENDIX B Selected Fifth Annual (2017) Restoration Photographs NOTE: A 10 -foot pole marked in one -foot increments held by a biologist about 25 feet from the camera is visible in all photos. The photos are identified with the station number (see Figure 2), direction of view, and date taken. -0 PLPS 8: northeast, top photo 19 July 2017, bottom photo 24 October 2013 P and U Lands Restoration Site Phase 2 B-1 PCS Phosphate Company, Inc. Fifth Annual Report August 2017 PLPS 9: southeast, top photo 19 July 2017, bottom photo 24 October 2013 P and U Lands Restoration Site Phase 2 B-2 PCS Phosphate Company, Inc. Fifth Annual Report August 2017 PLPS 10: southwest, top photo 19 July 2017, bottom photo 24 October 2013 P and U Lands Restoration Site Phase 2 B-3 PCS Phosphate Company, Inc. Fifth Annual Report August 2017 lv3 17 � r [ Ig or '4W PLPS 12: southeast, top photo 19 July 2017, bottom photo 24 October 2014 P and U Lands Restoration Site Phase 2 B-5 PCS Phosphate Company, Inc. Fifth Annual Report August 2017 PLPS 13: southwest (taken from the berm), top photo 19 July 2017, bottom photo 24 October 2013 P and U Lands Restoration Site Phase 2 B-6 PCS Phosphate Company, Inc. Fifth Annual Report August 2017