20120107 Ver 1_Year 4 Monitoring Report Ph III_2017_20180525

lutrien-
Feeding the Future -
Federal Express
May 25, 2018
Mr. Tom Steffens
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Washington Regulatory Field Office
2407 West 5th Street
Washington, North Carolina 27889
Dear Mr. Steffens:
Enclosed is the P and U Lands mitigation site Phase 3 (Year 4) monitoring report for the 2017 monitoring
year. The entire report, including all text, tables, figures and appendices, as well as the 2016 well data
tables, Gum Swamp Run flow data and flow videos, are located on the DVD which accompanies the report.
Earthwork was initiated on Phase 3 in May 2012 and planting was complete in February 2014. If you have
any questions, please call me at [phone], or Julia Berger of CZR Incorporated at [phone].
Sincerely,
Jof Prey C. Furness
Senior Scientist
Enclosure
PC: Mac Haupt, DWR - Raleigh w/encl.
Anthony Scarbraugh, DWR —Wash. w/ encl.
S. Cooper, CZR w/encl.
J. Ricketts w/encl.
23-11-020 w/encl.
1630 NC Hwy 306 South, Aurora, NC USA 27806
1 Effective January 1, 2018, PCS Phosphate Company, Inc. is an indirect subsidiary of Nutrien Ltd. PCs Phosphate Company, Inc.
remains the legal operating entity and permittee.

FOURTH ANNUAL (2017) REPORT FOR THE
P AND U LANDS RESTORATION SITE PHASE 3
RICHLAND TOWNSHIP
BEAUFORT COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
Prepared for:
PCS Phosphate Company, Inc.
Prepared by:
CZR Incorporated
May 2018

FOURTH ANNUAL (2017) REPORT FOR THE
P AND U LANDS RESTORATION SITE PHASE 3
RICHLAND TOWNSHIP
BEAUFORT COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
Prepared for:
PCS Phosphate Company, Inc.
Prepared by:
CZR Incorporated
May 2018

TABLE OF CONTENTS
1.0
PROJECT OVERVIEW .......................
1.1
History .................................................
1.2
Location ...............................................
1.3
Goals and Performance Criteria..........
2.0
REQUIREMENTS ...............................
2.1
Normal Rainfall and Growing Season.
2.2
Hydrology ............................................
2.3
Flow .....................................................
2.4
Vegetation ...........................................
2.5
Photographic Documentation ..............
2.6
Reporting .............................................
3.0
2017 RESULTS ..................................
3.1
Rainfall ................................................
3.2
Hydrology ............................................
3.3
Flow .....................................................
3.4
Vegetation ...........................................
3.5
Photographic Documentation ..............
4.0
SUMMARY .........................................
1
1
1
2
3
3
3
3
4
4
4
4
4
5
5
6
7
7
LITERATURECITED.......................................................................................................................9
Cover Photos — Aerial photo looking north over the section of Phase 3 that contains the upper
headwater valley of Gum Swamp Run, 11 March 2017. Bottom Left: Aerial photo looking south
over the western section of Phase 3 near the South Creek Canal, 27 August 2017. Bottom Right:
Aerial photo looking east over the middle and eastern section of Phase 3 that borders County
Line Road.
LIST OF TABLES
Table 1 P and U Lands Phase 3 performance criteria, methods summary, and current
Figure 1 P and U Lands Mitigation Site - Phase 3 Vicinity Map
Figure 2 P and U Lands Mitigation Site - Phase 3 Monitoring Locations
Figure 3 P and U Lands Mitigation Site - Phase 3 Soils
Figure 4 P and U Lands Mitigation Site - Phase 3 Monitoring Locations on As Built LiDAR
Figure 5 2017 Bay City and WETS -Aurora Rainfall
Figure 6 P and U Lands Mitigation Site - Phase 3 2017 Longest Hydroperiods and
Estimated Hydrologic Zones during All Rainfall Conditions
Figure 7 P and U Lands Mitigation Site - Phase 3 2017 Hydroperiods and Estimated
Hydrologic Zones during WETS Normal and Below Normal Rainfall
P and U Lands Restoration Site Phase 3 iii PCS Phosphate Company, Inc.
Fourth Annual Report May 2018
status..........................................................................................................................
T-1
Table 2
Hydroperiods of 96 non -riparian monitoring wells at P and U Lands Phase 3
restoration site and three Rodman control wells during all rainfall conditions in
2017............................................................................................................................
T-2
Table 3
Hydroperiods of 96 non -riparian monitoring wells at P and U Lands Phase 3
restoration site and three Rodman control wells during normal and below normal
rainfallin 2017..........................................................................................................
T-16
Table 4
Summary of flow events recorded at fixed flow camera stations and during
monthlysite visits......................................................................................................
T-33
Table 5
Fourth annual survival of trees and shrubs planted in 94 0.3 -acre plots at P and
ULands Phase 3......................................................................................................
T-34
Table 6
Fourth annual survival of trees and shrubs planted in four 0.11 -acre buffer plots
along Gum Swamp Run and two 0.11 -acre buffer plots along a low energy
headwater valley south of Gum Swamp Run at P and U Lands Phase 3 ................
T-36
LIST OF FIGURES
Figure 1 P and U Lands Mitigation Site - Phase 3 Vicinity Map
Figure 2 P and U Lands Mitigation Site - Phase 3 Monitoring Locations
Figure 3 P and U Lands Mitigation Site - Phase 3 Soils
Figure 4 P and U Lands Mitigation Site - Phase 3 Monitoring Locations on As Built LiDAR
Figure 5 2017 Bay City and WETS -Aurora Rainfall
Figure 6 P and U Lands Mitigation Site - Phase 3 2017 Longest Hydroperiods and
Estimated Hydrologic Zones during All Rainfall Conditions
Figure 7 P and U Lands Mitigation Site - Phase 3 2017 Hydroperiods and Estimated
Hydrologic Zones during WETS Normal and Below Normal Rainfall
P and U Lands Restoration Site Phase 3 iii PCS Phosphate Company, Inc.
Fourth Annual Report May 2018

APPENDICES
Appendix A Gum Swamp Run Stream 2017 Survey and Evidence of Flow
Appendix B Stem Counts at Individual Plots at P and U Lands Restoration Site Phase 3
Appendix C Selected Fourth Annual Restoration Photographs
NOTE: Copy of entire report, hydrology, and flow data included on the DVD:
DVD - Fourth Annual (2017) Report for the P and U Lands Restoration Site Phase 3 Report,
Cover Letter, Hydrology Tables, Gum Swamp Run Daily Flow Observations in 2017, Gum
Swamp Run Stream Survey Videos, 2017 Monthly Flow Observation Videos, and Selected 2017
Mounted Game Camera Flow Videos
P and U Lands Restoration Site Phase 3 iv PCS Phosphate Company, Inc.
Fourth Annual Report May 2018

1.0 PROJECT OVERVIEW
1.1 History. The approximately 3,667 -acre P and U Lands restoration site is part of
the PCS Phosphate Company Inc.'s (PCS) compensatory mitigation to offset unavoidable
impacts to wetlands and waters authorized under United States Army Corps of Engineers
(USACE) Action ID: 200110096 and North Carolina Division of Water Quality (DWQ) Water
Quality Certification (WQC) #2008-0868 version 2.0. As described in the mitigation plan prepared
for the pre -construction notification (PCN) to the USACE (CZR 2012), the site was planned to be
constructed in three phases as shown on Figure 1 of the plan. This report concerns third annual
monitoring of the 1,755 acres of Phase 3 conducted by CZR Incorporated (CZR) of Wilmington,
NC. (The P and U designation have no special meaning other than that was the historic label
given to PCS and Weyerhaeuser properties with similar ownership agreements.)
The design team consisted of Jonathan T. Ricketts, Inc. of Palm Beach Gardens, FL, the
restoration design engineer, PCS, and CZR. Earthwork was performed by Sawyer's Land
Developing, Inc. out of Belhaven, NC and supervised by the design team. Phase 1 and 2
restoration activities occurred September 2011 -March 2013. Phase 3 construction began in Gum
Swamp Run on 9 May 2012 and on 22 June 2012 on the larger Phase 3 area. Phase 3 was
constructed with a total of 14 NC Division of Land Resources Erosion and Sediment Control
(DLR) permits for land clearing which were subsequently modified for the construction of the
interior ditch plugs and perimeter berms and ditches. Planting of Phase 3 occurred February
2014.
The P and U Lands site is a key component linking PCS Phosphate Company, Inc.'s
(PCS) Parker Farm Mitigation Site, Bay City Farm Mitigation Site, Gum Run Mitigation Site, and
the South Creek Corridor into a large and varied collection of restored wetland and preserved
natural areas (South Creek Corridor Complex). Restoration of the headwaters and upper valley
of historic Gum Swamp Run, a tributary to South Creek, is one of the goals of Phase 3. Unlike
most other PCS mitigation sites, the P and U Lands are not prior -converted agricultural fields.
Other than the existing roads, most of the acreage in which earthwork occurred was in some
stage of silviculture, usually various -aged pine stands, and contained regularly spaced ditches
(deeper than the agricultural ditches on other restoration sites that were filled in as part of
restoration work) and the bedding common to pine plantations. The removal of all standing
timber and stumps and post-harvest debris presented particular challenges as the organic soils
precluded safe burning of the timber slash on site. Consequently, some of the debris was piled
into somewhat evenly shaped and sized mounds throughout the site which provide additional
wildlife habitat.
1.2 Location. The P and U Lands site is located east and west of Bay City Road
(SR1002), approximately 4.5 miles southeast of Aurora, Richland Township, North Carolina. Bay
City Road runs through the P Lands portion of the site, which is bounded on the east by SR 1918
(Peele Road is the unpaved extension of SR 1918) and on the south by "County Line Road" (a
gated gravel road along the Beaufort/Pamlico County border). The U Lands portion of the site
lies west and southwest of Bay City Farm (the western portion of the P Lands site referred to as
the "panhandle" separates Bay City Farm from the U Lands). South Creek and the South Creek
Canal form the northern and northwestern boundaries, Bonner/Rodman Road forms the western
boundary, and the Pamlico/Beaufort County line forms the southern boundary of the U Lands
(County Line Road itself is the southern boundary of only the eastern half of the U Lands as the
western limit of County Line Road terminates at the midpoint of the south property line). The
entire site is accessed via multiple gated roads along Bay City Road, Peele Road, County Line
Road, and/or Jaime/Executive Road. The site is located within the Pamlico Hydrologic Unit
03020104 of the Tar -Pamlico River basin within the South Creek subbasin at latitude 35.233831
and longitude 76.775742. Portions of the site can be found on the USGS Aurora, Bayboro, South
Creek, and Vandemere quadrangles (Figures 1 and 2).
P and U Lands Restoration Site Phase 3 1 PCS Phosphate Company, Inc.
Fourth Annual Report May 2018

1.3 Goals and Performance Criteria. The primary goal of the entire project is to re-
establish a self-sustaining functional wetland and coastal plain headwater stream valley complex
to allow surface flow to move through vegetated wetlands before reaching any stream. Mitigation
yields are estimated and performance criteria are described for the project in detail in the
Compensatory Mitigation Plan for P and U Lands Restoration Site (CZR 2012). Performance
criteria for Phase 3 are summarized in Table 1. Over time the 1,755 -acre Phase 3 portion of the
site is expected to successfully re-establish approximately:
19 acres of riverine swamp forest (erroneously omitted in previous reports),
150 wetland acres of headwater forest,
580 wetland acres of non-riverine swamp forest,
479 acres of pond -pine pocosin forest,
96 wetland acres of hardwood flat forest,
30 acres of Tar -Pamlico riparian buffer of Gum Swamp Run (under the new consolidated
rules, the estimated acres may increase),
12 acres of existing non -wetland forest (at upper end of Gum Swamp Run),
4 acres (7,141 linear feet) of zero and first order stream including a low energy stream
(Gum Swamp Run), and
33 acres of open water in plugged ditches.
The work is also expected to successfully enhance/rehabilitate portions of the 271 acres
of existing forested wetland north and east of the north end of Gum Road. At the end of
December 2013, there was a 9.06 acre unplanted area designated for equipment to complete
construction of the perimeter berm and parking lot post -Phase 3 planting. This area was a 25 -
foot wide corridor offset from the inside edge of the perimeter berm. Construction progress
allowed 2.36 acres of the offset to be planted during 2014 Phase 3 planting and the remaining 6.7
acres were planted in 2015 when Phase 4 was planted. The stems used for planting in the offset
were an assortment of stems from the unplanted debris pile footprints. The species mix in the
offset did not replicate the original planting zones; therefore, these 9.06 acres are not included in
the specific wetland planting zones in the list above but are to be included in wetland restoration
total.
The remaining 73 acres are comprised of existing roads, perimeter berms, and other
man -dominated areas. The --18,301 linear feet of jurisdictional waters in roadside ditches and
canals along Bay City Road 2 and County Line Road 2 will remain unplugged (these distances
are included in the 33 acres of open water). Approximately 12,980 feet of roadside ditches
parallel to Gum Road and a 3,400 -foot roadside ditch north of Bay City 4 will also remain
unplugged. To increase surface water storage, the original plans showed installation of plugs in
these roadside ditches after the first year. However, data collected thus far indicates sufficient
surface water storage to meet the wetland hydrology criterion at almost every well location.
The numbers listed in this year's report reflect corrections recently noticed in previous
reports (e.g., omissions and/or calculation errors) during the final acres tally for Phase 4 reports
and rectification for the entire P and U Lands mitigation site. The wetland acreages shown in the
PCN represent the various wetland target types based on the boundaries established in the field
by the project surveyor. Minor changes which occurred during the site's development, such as
the placement of excess fill in some of the interior and roadside ditches, required minor
adjustments to the original distribution of acres proposed in the PCN. These small differences
are typical for a project which took over four years to complete and included changes with each
year's work as a result of weather delays or excessive wetness.
P and U Lands Restoration Site Phase 3 2 PCS Phosphate Company, Inc.
Fourth Annual Report May 2018

2.0 REQUIREMENTS
2.1 Normal Rainfall and Growing Season. A continuous electronic rain gauge on the
adjacent Bay City Mitigation Site is downloaded once a month and its data are used in
conjunction with data from nearby automated weather stations (e.g., NRCS WETS data from
NOAA's site at Aurora and rain gauges at other nearby monitoring sites) to determine normal
rainfall during the monitoring period. Bay City data were compared to the WETS range of normal
precipitation to determine if Bay City rainfall was within the normal range. The range of normal
precipitation for this report refers to the 30th and 70th percentile thresholds of the probability of
having onsite rainfall amounts less than or higher than those thresholds. The range of normal
and the 30 -day rolling total data lines begin on the last day of each month and the current year
Aurora monthly precipitation total is plotted on the last day of each month.
Under the 2010 regional guidance from the Corps of Engineers for wetland hydroperiods,
the normal growing season for Beaufort County is 28 February to 6 December or 282 days
(WETS table for Beaufort County first/last freeze date 28 degrees F 50 percent probability) (US
Army Corps of Engineers 2010). At the suggestion of the Corps' Washington regulatory field
office, data collected between 1 February and 27 February provide important information related
to analyses of site hydrology during the early growing season, but are not part of the hydroperiod
calculation for success.
2.2 Hydrology. Figure 2 depicts the locations of hydrology monitoring equipment,
Figure 3 shows these locations on Beaufort County soil polygons, and Figure 4 shows all
monitoring locations on the as -built LiDAR. To document surface storage and hydroperiods of all
wetland types on the site, 96 semi -continuous electronic LevelTroll water level monitoring wells
(manufactured by InSitu) are deployed at a density of approximately 1 well/15 acres across all
planted areas of Phase 3, with the exception of two wells that were installed near a ditch to be
used in conjunction with a nearby well to monitor lateral drainage effects from the open perimeter
ditches. Exclosures constructed of barbed wire wrapped around metal fence posts were built
around all wells to reduce likelihood of disturbance or equipment loss by black bears.
Three wells were installed 13 March 2013 in a recently timbered tract west of Rodman
Road in the Ponzer soil series as controls for the P and U Lands wells in the same soil type
(Figures 1-4). To serve as additional controls, in November of 2015, four wells were installed at
previous well locations within the adjacent Bay City Farm. According to the LiDAR data, these
four locations will also represent Ponzer soils but at lower elevations than the three Rodman
wells. Four wells were reinstalled in the Bay City Mitigation Site, also in the Ponzer soil series, on
3 and 4 November 2015 to be used as control wells to compare to the P and U Lands Restoration
Sites.
Electronic wells collect data every 1.5 hours, are downloaded once a month, and the data
evaluated to document wetland hydroperiods. Wetland hydroperiods are calculated by counting
consecutive days with water level no deeper than 12 inches below the soil surface during the
growing season under normal or below normal rainfall conditions and then for all rainfall
conditions.
2.3 Flow. Stream surveys are conducted annually to document conditions in the
restored headwater stream valley of Gum Swamp Run and the valley to the south. The entire
length of the valley is walked. Active flow and features formed by previous flow are documented
with GPS, photo and/or video. In the first few years, the surveys will be performed usually twice
annually (once in the dry time of year and once in the wet); however, herbaceous vegetation
colonization may vary this schedule. As an experiment, in April 2015, two game/trail cameras (Ltl
Acorn HD Video MMS Wireless 12 mega pixels) were installed in the upper valley of Gum Swamp
Run to capture flow conditions in the valley on a daily basis via regularly programmed video.
These cameras are mounted on wooden posts at the edge of the 40 -foot valley; the locations of
P and U Lands Restoration Site Phase 3 3 PCS Phosphate Company, Inc.
Fourth Annual Report May 2018

the camera may be moved over the course of monitoring depending on their functionality and
valley conditions through time. Also beginning in June 2015, at the monthly downloads, biologists
download these cameras and make observations at these two locations and also walk to the Gum
Swamp Run valley/stream in the vicinity of eight nearby monitoring wells and at two locations
along the valley to the south, to take additional video of flow, make note of other observations of
evidence of past or current flow (e.g., debris wrack, sediment scour or sorting), and water depth.
The cameras are programmed to record twice each day.
Within the Gum Swamp Run valley, a 2 -foot wide channel was constructed within the first
two field sections east of Bay City Road (SR1002) and in the lower half of the third section (in the
upper half of third section, no construction occurred). In order to recapture flow from a portion of
the adjacent Parker Farm which LiDAR indicated historically flowed to Gum Swamp Run, a
shallow 40 -foot wide valley was constructed from the fifth field section east of Bay City Road up
to the top of the valley. No construction occurred in the fourth field section, an area called the
bowl, where the slope flattened between the two constructed segments.
2.4 Vegetation. Annual surveys of the 94 0.3 -acre planted vegetation monitoring
plots occur in the fall, usually between September - December. The plots represent 2 percent of
the restoration area (Figure 2). Nuisance monitoring plots (1 meter square) were established in
2014 at the upper corner opposite the well (along the long axis of the plot) in all tree plots and all
woody stems taller than 1 foot were counted and identified. Six additional 0.11 -acre plots were
established and surveyed in December 2015 to monitor stem density in potential stream buffer
zones along the restored Gum Run headwaters (four plots) and the low-energy headwater valley
system south of Gum Swamp Run (Figure 2).
Extra stems (the unplanted footprint of the debris piles) from the Phase 4 2015 planting
were planted in Phase 3 in the 25 -foot wide area along the interior of the perimeter berm in some
locations (the bottom of the U Lands west of Gum Road, along Bay City Road, County Line Road,
and along Jamie Road at the top of Gum Road; a total of approximately 6 acres). These "25 -foot
offset areas", were unplanted in 2014 in order to maintain an equipment access corridor post -
planting in 2014. No additional vegetation monitoring plots were added.
2.5 Photographic Documentation. Fifteen permanent photo point locations were
established along the perimeter of the restoration area (Figure 2). Annual photos are taken in the
fall.
2.6 Reporting. Further details of construction and monitoring are included in the as
built, first, second, and third annual reports (CZR 2015a, 2015b, 2016, 2017).
3.0 2017 RESULTS
3.1 Rainfall. Total rainfall in 2017 at Bay City was 50.61 inches, 9.99 inches less
than 2016. The 30 -day rolling total of 2017 Bay City rainfall shows the following periods as above
normal (above the WETS 701" percentile longer than several days): 1 July — 24 July and 24
August — 22 September (Figure 5). Wetland hydroperiods were calculated for the entire year
regardless of rainfall and also calculated with above normal rainfall periods excluded.
The US Drought Monitor (http://droughtmonitor.uni.edu) provides a synthesis of multiple
indices and reflects the consensus of federal and academic scientists on regional conditions on a
weekly basis (updated each Thursday). In 2017, nine of the 41 weeks of the growing season
were considered abnormally dry (DO) (10 October — 5 December); the remaining weeks were
normal with no drought status in the vicinity of the P and U Lands project area.
P and U Lands Restoration Site Phase 3 4 PCS Phosphate Company, Inc.
Fourth Annual Report May 2018

3.2 Hydrology. The performance criterion for hydrology in the hardwood flat zones
(Z5 and Z6) is a wetland hydroperiod for 6 percent or more of the growing season, and 10
percent or more for the other zones (Table 1). All 10 wells in Z5 and Z6 had a wetland
hydroperiod for more than 6 percent of the growing season, even when periods of above normal
rainfall were excluded (Tables 2 and 3, Figures 6 and 7). Pre -construction LiDAR and field
reconnaissance indicated higher elevations in these two hardwood flat planting zones and they
were planted with species less tolerant of longer hydroperiods.
In the other zones, 90 percent of wells (78 of 86) had a wetland hydroperiod for more
than 10 percent of the growing season, even when periods of above normal rainfall were
excluded. There were eight wells that did not meet the hydrology criterion in 2017. Of those
eight wells, two (PUM115 and PUM116) are located along the most downstream section of the
Gum Swamp Run 2 -foot valley where heavy equipment was used to move dirt and construct the
channel. Another well, PUM113, is located near PUM115 and PUM116 and just off a constructed
berm. Soil compaction in these areas may have affected the hydrology. For PUM161, 2017 was
the first year the well did not record a wetland hydroperiod for 10 percent or more of the growing
season. Total annual rainfall for 2017 was lower than any other year of monitoring for Phase 3.
Two wells, PUM187 and PUM195, were installed in areas of higher elevation (based on field
observation and herbaceous volunteers). The drainage ditch along the west side of County Line
No. 2 may have affected the hydrology at PUM175. The eighth well is one of a pair of wells,
PUM192 and PUM193, used to measure the effectiveness of the keyway in the berm to prevent
drainage effects from the perimeter canal. PUM193 recorded a wetland hydroperiod for more
than 10 percent of the growing season while PUM192 did not; PUM192 is immediately next to the
25 -foot unplanted corridor used to complete construction of the perimeter berm while other areas
of Phase 3 were planted (the corridor was planted the next year along with Phase 4 acres). The
corridor and adjacent areas may also have been affected by compaction from weeks of
concentrated use by construction vehicles. All other keyway well pairs in Phase 1 and Phase 2 in
various soil types (Dare, Ponzer, Wasda, and Portsmouth) met the wetland hydrology criterion
and demonstrated effectiveness of the keyway in the berm; these two wells are the only pair in
soil mapped as Tomotley.
During all rainfall conditions, the three Rodman control wells recorded a wetland
hydroperiod for 25-75 percent of the growing season. The four Bay City control wells had a
wetland hydroperiod in three of the four hydrologic zones: >6-12.5 percent, >25-75 percent, and
>75 percent. Hydrologic zones for six of the seven control wells were not affected by the above
normal rainfall; however, one Bay City control well dropped from >75 percent to >25-75 percent.
3.3 Flow. Appendix A contains the 2017 flow information collected in Phase 3
stream valley survey, selected photographs and referenced videos, and a list of videos of flow
captured in the two valleys in 2017. All 2017 flow videos are included only on the accompanying
DVD in three folders: selected mounted game cameras, monthly observations, and stream
survey. Four representative flow videos were selected from each of the two mounted game
cameras; one video per quarter of the year recorded during a different week of the monthly
downloads. Daily flow videos from the game cameras are available upon request. Also included
on the DVD is a file containing data for each month with daily flow observations taken from the
videos of the two mounted cameras. In 2017, a stream survey occurred (20 September) which
documented continuous moderate to low flow within the lower Gum Swamp Run 2 -foot valley.
Water depths varied from 5 to 15 inches and was bankfull or out of the channel. Occasionally
moderate flow was observed, but low flow was more common due to vegetation growing in the
channel. Herbaceous vegetation obscured the visibility of the channel and any features that have
formed, especially downstream of XS5, and was rooted in the channel itself in places, which was
first noted in 2016.
For the area known as the bowl (area of no construction between the 2 -foot channel and
the 40 -foot valley), the survey documented low to moderate flow along a continuous path across
the entire bowl with depths averaging between 4 to 12 inches, and 14 inches deep in rutted
P and U Lands Restoration Site Phase 3 5 PCS Phosphate Company, Inc.
Fourth Annual Report May 2018

areas. Two distinct flow paths were mapped in previous stream surveys between Stations
40+00 and 44+00 and during the September survey, water seemed to prefer a middle path
between them.
In the 40 -foot valley, low to moderate flow was consistent for the entire length during the
survey with water depths mostly between 6 to 14 inches and some areas around 24 inches deep.
Low flow occurred in areas with shallower depths and/or thicker vegetation, but moderate flow
was more common. Due to vegetation clumps and overbank flow, a discernible flow path was not
picked up until near station 6+00.
All Gum Swamp Run flow observation locations had at least two observed flow events
during all rainfall and when periods of above normal rainfall were excluded (Table 4). Flow
events were also inferred at observation locations based on instances of observed flow at
shallower depths at the same station. The downstream flow station near PUM127 along the
headwater valley to the south of Gum Swamp Run had no documented flow events with four
inferred events during all rainfall and three inferred events during normal and below normal
rainfall; flow was not observed in 2017 at the upstream flow station near PUM126. The volunteer
channel that formed downstream of the intervalley connector between Gum Swamp Run and the
secondary headwater valley (PUM115 South Feature), had no documented flow events (three
inferred) during all rainfall and normal and below normal rainfall. The two mounted cameras in
the 40 -foot valley captured numerous flow events for 2017; GSR Camera 1 recorded 60 flow
events (284 inferred) and GSR Camera 2 recorded 227 flow events (257 inferred).
3.4 Vegetation. Planting zones of Phase 3 were divided into several community
types: riverine swamp forest (Z1), headwater forest (Z2), non- riverine swamp forest (Z3), pond
pine pocosin forest (Z4), and two zones of hardwood flat (Z5 and Z6). Using only the number of
planted stems that were unquestionably alive in the monitoring plots, the most conservative
estimate of survival is presented. Some stems appeared dead or questionable, but based on
prior experience, a stem needs to appear dead (or not be found) for two surveys before it can be
confidently counted as dead. Appendix B contains the number of stems by zone that were
unquestionably alive in each plot for the fall 2017 survey.
Overall survival of trees that were unquestionably alive in the 94 plots from the time of
planting to the Year 4 fall survey was 73 percent, with a corresponding density of 294 trees per
acre (Table 5). Bald cypress (Taxodium distichum), pond cypress (T. ascendens), titi (Cyrilla
racemiflora), Atlantic white cedar (Chamaecyparis thyoides), and cherrybark oak (Quercus
pagoda) had the highest survival of stems with 97, 96, 90, 87, and 84 percent of stems alive
respectively. Excluding unknown species, white oak (Q. alba), persimmon (Diospyros virginiana),
and ironwood (Carpinus caroliniana) had the lowest survival with 38, 43, and 47 percent of alive
stems respectively. If trees with uncertain survival status (stem appeared dead but could not be
confirmed) were included with trees that were definitely alive, survival increased to 78 percent
and a density of 315 trees per acre.
Overall survival of shrubs that were unquestionably alive from the time of planting to the
Year 4 fall survey was 76 percent with a corresponding density of nine shrubs per acre scattered
among the 11 species planted (Table 5). Inkberry (Ilex glabra), possumhaw (Viburnum nudum),
and Virginia sweetspire (Itea virginica) had the highest percent of unquestionably alive stems with
93, 86, and 85 respectively. If all shrubs with uncertain survival status (stem appeared dead but
could not be confirmed) were included with shrubs that were definitely alive, survival increased to
81 percent but the density remained at nine stems per acre.
When trees, shrubs and unknown species that were definitely alive were combined,
density increased to 303 stems per acre and if stems with uncertain survival were added, the
density increased to 324 stems per acre. At year four, different species of trees are surviving and
there is a diverse assemblage of trees interspersed with a healthy shrub component. In many
areas of the site, volunteer woody wetland stems (e.g. red bay [Persea borbonia], sweet bay
P and U Lands Restoration Site Phase 3 6 PCS Phosphate Company, Inc.
Fourth Annual Report May 2018

[Magnolia virginiana]) will enhance the diversity and density of the site. The volunteers will be
counted in 2018 (Year 5).
In the buffer plots, a total of 250 alive stems among 12 large tree species, two small tree
species, and one shrub species were found in the 2017 survey (Table 6). Most of the identified
trees were swamp chestnut oak (Quercus michauxii), bald cypress, and water tupelo (Nyssa
aquatica); one shrub, an American beautyberry (Callicarpa americana), was tagged in a buffer
plot. Based on the six plots, the total density of trees alive in the buffer area was 377 stems per
acre at year four survey and 408 if the unsure stems are added. After combining the trees, shrubs
and unknown species that were definitely alive, stem density increases to 379 stems per acre and
if stems with uncertain survival are added, the density within the riparian buffer increases to 414
stems per acre. Even though the stem density criterion is the same for the alternate riparian
buffer restoration and non -riparian wetland restoration, the results from the six buffer plots were
not added to the results from the other plots because the buffer plots were established within
what was considered the riparian buffer footprint (see Table 1).
The Corps determined that three tree species have the possibility to outcompete young
planted trees at a mitigation site and need to be monitored as nuisance species to ensure they do
not take over a mitigation site. These species are loblolly pine (Pinus taeda), red maple (Acer
rubrum), and sweetgum (Liquidambar styraciflua). In 2016, a total of 470 stems were found in all
nuisance plots and 50 stems were of the three species mentioned (10.6 percent). Of the 50
stems, 25 were pine, 21 were red maple, and four were sweetgum. Young loblolly pine and pond
pine are often difficult to distinguish from each other and so some of the pond pine counted in
nuisance plots might be loblolly pine. Of the 25 pines previously mentioned, 17 were identified as
pond pine. None of the three nuisance species exceeded 20 percent (either in aggregate or
separately) in either Year 2 or Year 3 survey, so per the nuisance monitoring plan, no remediation
was necessary.
3.5 Photographic Documentation. A few photos representative of 2017 conditions
are included with this report (Appendix C). More are available upon request.
4.0 SUMMARY
According to WETS rainfall calculations, 2017 rainfall recorded at the Bay City gauge was
normal or below normal WETS rainfall except for July 1 — July 24 and August 24 - September 22.
The wells in the hardwood flat zones had a wetland hydroperiod for 6 percent or more of the
growing season during all rainfall conditions and during normal or below normal rainfall. In the
other zones, 90 percent of wells (78 of 86) had a wetland hydroperiod for more than 10 percent of
the growing season during all rainfall conditions. After hydroperiods that occurred during the two
periods of above normal rainfall were excluded, 78 wells had a hydroperiod for more than 10
percent of the growing season.
In 2017, a stream survey occurred (20 September) which documented continuous
moderate to low flow within the lower Gum Swamp Run 2 -foot valley. Water depths varied from 5
to 15 inches and was bankfull or out of the channel. For the area known as the bowl (area of no
construction between the 2 -foot channel and the 40 -foot valley), the September survey
documented low to moderate flow along a continuous path across the entire bowl with depths
averaging between 4 to 12 inches, and 14 inches deep in rutted areas. Flow preferred a new
middle path between the two paths noted in 2016. In the 40 -foot valley, low to moderate flow was
consistent for the entire length during the survey and water depths were mostly between 6 to 14
inches with some areas around 24 inches deep.
All Gum Swamp Run flow observation locations had at least two observed flow events
during all rainfall and when periods of above normal rainfall were excluded. The downstream flow
P and U Lands Restoration Site Phase 3 7 PCS Phosphate Company, Inc.
Fourth Annual Report May 2018

station near PUM127 along the headwater valley to the south of Gum Swamp Run had no
documented flow events, three inferred events during all rainfall, as well as four inferred events
during normal and below normal rainfall; flow was not observed in 2017 at the upstream flow
station near PUM126 but three events were inferred during normal and below normal rainfall.
The volunteer channel, called PUM115 South Feature, that formed downstream of the intervalley
connector between Gum Swamp Run and the secondary headwater valley had no documented
flow events (3 inferred) during all rainfall and normal and below normal rainfall. The two mounted
cameras in the 40 -foot valley captured numerous flow events for the year; GSR Camera 1
recorded 61 flow events (284 inferred) and GSR Camera 2 recorded 227 flow events (257
inferred).
Overall survival of trees that were unquestionably alive in the 94 plots from the time of
planting to the Year 4 fall survey was 73 percent, with a corresponding density of 294 trees per
acre. Overall survival of shrubs that were unquestionably alive from the time of planting to the
Year 4 fall survey was 76 percent with a corresponding density of nine shrubs per acre. When
trees, shrubs and unknown species which were definitely alive were combined, density increased
to 303 stems per acre. A total of 250 stems among 14 tree species and one shrub stem were
found unquestionably alive in the buffer plots. Based on these six buffer plots, total density of tree
and shrub stems unquestionably alive was 379 stems per acre (414 when the unsure stems are
included). The buffer stem density was not added into the stem density of the other planted acres
because the plots were established within what was considered the riparian buffer footprint.
Different species of trees and shrubs are surviving well in the fourth year and there is a diverse
assemblage of trees interspersed with a healthy shrub component. In many areas of the site,
volunteer woody wetland stems (e.g. red bay [Persea borbonia] and sweet bay [Magnolia
virginiana]) will enhance the diversity and density of the site.
P and U Lands Restoration Site Phase 3 8 PCS Phosphate Company, Inc.
Fourth Annual Report May 2018

LITERATURE CITED
CZR Incorporated. 2012. Compensatory Mitigation Plan for P and U Lands Restoration Site.
CZR Incorporated. 2015a. As -Built Report for the P and U Lands Restoration Site Phase 3.
CZR Incorporated. 2015b. First Annual Report for the P and U Lands Restoration Site Phase 3.
CZR Incorporated. 2016. Second Annual Report for the P and U Lands Restoration Site Phase 3.
CZR Incorporated. 2017. Third Annual Report for the P and U Lands Restoration Site Phase 3.
Kirby, Robert M. 1995. The soil survey of Beaufort County, North Carolina. Natural Resources
Conservation Service, USDA.
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. 2002. Regulatory guidance letter (RGL) 02-02. Guidance on
Compensatory mitigation projects for aquatic resource impacts under the Corps
regulatory program pursuant to Section 404 of the Clean Water Act and Section 10 of the
Rivers and Harbors Act.
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. 2005. Technical Standard for Water -Table Monitoring of Potential
Wetland Sites. WRAP Technical Notes Collection (ERDC TN -WRAP -05-2). U.S. Army
Engineer Research and Development Center, Vicksburg, MS
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. 2008. Regulatory Guidance Letter (RGL) 08-03. Minimum
monitoring requirements for compensatory mitigation projects involving the restoration,
establishment, and/or enhancement of aquatic resources.
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. 2010. Regional supplement to the Corps of Engineers wetland
delineation manual: Atlantic and Gulf coastal plain region. Version 2.0. J.S. Wakeley,
R.W. Lichvar, and C.V. Noble, eds. ERCD/EL TR -08-30, Vicksburg, MS.
P and U Lands Restoration Site Phase 3 9 PCS Phosphate Company, Inc.
Fourth Annual Report May 2018

Table 1. P and U Lands Phase 3 performance criteria, methods summarv. and current status fourth annual. 2017.
Type of mitigation
Performance criteria
Documentation methods
Dimension & controls
Current status
acre including 4 native
Planted stem plots within
as stated in modified 401
In 2017, all 10 wells in the
Alternate riparian buffer
species (trees/shrubs);
buffer area or buffer plots
certification dated 15
hardwood flat zones had a
restoration -coastal plain
no one species shall
that may be monitored
January 2009 (DWQ#based
wetland hydroperiod for 6
headwater stream valley
exceed 50 percent;
on stream
2008-0868); per October
percent or more of the growing
>6 % hydroperiod on
development or new buffer
Growing season 28 Feb-
season during all rainfall and
hydric soils for
Semi -continuous monitoring
6 Dec; Aurora NOAA
when periods of above normal
hardwood flats; >10%
wells (1/15ac); nearby rain
WETS data for normal
rainfall were excluded. In the
for other communities
gauge
rainfall
remaining zones, 78 of 86 wells
had a hydroperiod for more than
Non -riparian wetland re-
10 percent of the growing
establishment
season, even when periods of
(restoration) of non-
above normal rainfall were
riverine swamp forest,
excluded.
hardwood flat, headwater
forest communities
In 2017, survival of planted tree
stems that were unquestionably
alive was 294 stems/acre and
Survival of 260 stems
survivial of shrubs was 9
per acre of 5 -year old
Vegetation plots on
Annual monitoring
stems/acre for a density of 303.
planted woody wetland
approximately 2% of the site
When trees, shrubs, and
stems
unknown species of both
categories are added together,
survival becomes 324
stems/acre.
All Gum Swamp Run flow
observation locations had at least
two flow events during all rainfall
conditions and when periods of
above normal rainfall were
excluded. The downstream flow
station along the headwater valley
to the south of Gum Swamp Run
had no documented flow events
(three inferred events) during all
Linear feet of credit
rainfall conditions and when periods
based on most
Documentation of flow
Calendar year; Aurora
of above normal rainfall were
Zero to first order stream
upstream location of
p
conditions' (see text for list
NOAA WETS data for
excluded. Flow was not observed
restoration within coastal
flow documented at
of conditions);
normal rainfall; flow
in 2017 at the upstream flow station.
plain riparian headwater
system
least twice per year in 3
semi -continuous monitoring
confined to times of
The volunteer channel, called
PUM115 South Feature, that
years out of 5 (starting
well arrays; GPS
normal rainfall
formed downstream of the
February 2013)
intervalley connector between Gum
Swamp Run and the secondary
headwater valley had no
documented flow events (three
inferred) during all rainfall and when
periods of above normal rainfall
were excluded. The stream survey
conducted in September 2017 noted
flow along the 2 -foot and 40 -foot
channel sections of Gum Swamp
Run.
P and U Lands Restoration Site Phase 3 T-1 PCS Phosphate Company, Inc.
Fourth Annual Report May 2018
260 woody stems per
Flexible buffer mitigation
Six 0.11 -acre plots (2 in 40 -foot
acre including 4 native
Planted stem plots within
as stated in modified 401
Gum Swamp Run valley, 1 in the
Alternate riparian buffer
species (trees/shrubs);
buffer area or buffer plots
certification dated 15
bowl, 2 in 2 -foot Gum Swamp
restoration -coastal plain
no one species shall
that may be monitored
January 2009 (DWQ#based
Run valley, and 1 in headwater
headwater stream valley
exceed 50 percent;
on stream
2008-0868); per October
stream valley to south) showed
native volunteer stems
development or new buffer
2014 new consolidated
379 planted stems per acre
allowed in count
rule
buffer rule 15A NCAC
unquestionably alive in 2017.
026.0295
P and U Lands Restoration Site Phase 3 T-1 PCS Phosphate Company, Inc.
Fourth Annual Report May 2018

V)»22
@=e\
>1 00
M
o- 4
I / E
70
m « _
\ 7 U k
£E=7
=e 2 =
e=aR
0 / %
a = >
t
�k\\
�U)
\q\�
E u)
) \ k
rJ/2
\ 3 0
i7\0
e =
=>e>
= s = _
��a)
_§%>'
CO
3 $ \ 7
12/0
\ X %
\\\/
opt®
g a o >
0\££e
\#\2/
e\=E=
M 7 0-0
_
\E-a7E
.o===
0 a \ E ®
= 2 -0 §
(.0 >
\\ƒ\0-
0E�b\
\b -0=V)
0 = = 2 «
CO f 75 (
I I = t o
0)C7a
&
_ = 0
5 = 0 n @
/ CU ¥ E z =
Pak u Lands Restoration Site Phase 3 a2 PCS Phosphate Company, Inc.
Fourth Annual Report May 2018
\
!
\
x
x
x
\11�
/
\
\
\
\
/
x
x
x
x
Al
CO
x
0777»/
EE /\
o
n0\
m
e
n
/
/
\
«@
`
\�h\\
_
w=
t
$
It R n+
r R r+
r a r
9
/
\
\ 9
2
a
\ e
2
/
/
4
/
#
=
a
\ 9
2
3
\
CO \
CN
\
CO \
�
t
4
4
z
\
\
\ \
k
&
a =
\
&
a =
\
\
»
\
»
&
a =
\
\/\
7 3 $ o
L\\\
CO
3 /
m
w
E \«
t
CO
o#
w
w
/«
\ 6 3
w
n
w
n
n
N
n%
t
w\
n
»
22= LL
0±/
Ogg
7�0
\ Co r.0
/
CO
1--
/
$
?
CO
/
CO
=
E 00
/\a^
a)
70ƒ
}\r-
w
w
w
o
w
oa
w
2 2 �
t
cli
CIJ
N
N
N
® _ $
_
�/-0
%
4
k
k
k
k
k\
k
\
a
a
a
a
a
I
a
E
Pak u Lands Restoration Site Phase 3 a2 PCS Phosphate Company, Inc.
Fourth Annual Report May 2018

P and U Lands Restoration Site Phase 3 T-3 PCS Phosphate Company, Inc.
Fourth Annual Report May 2018
0
LL)
r -
n
0
LL)
X
X
LL)
N
A
0
Ln
N
Ln
x
X
X
N_
n
0
Ln
N
r
6
O
V
O
O
O j
V
O w N O 0
O
00
—
00
—
00
N
00
N
a
N O >
L
N M
�
00
1-M
c0
10
N Ln N M (.0
OQ0
M
r— M
10
U
N
�—
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
O
N
N
N
Ln
GO
00
i
i
CD
i
Ln
GO
00
i
LO
LO CO
i
00
4
M
6
N
00
00
N
1
M GO
N
00
�
LLQ
M
N
00
M 6
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
oo
—N
O
7
COLO
N
w
O
N
N
N
LO
N
-
N
-
N
N
N N
Ln ti
�
r0
U N M
f N
-O j U
O L O O
M L6
*
N
=
O't
N
O
O
M
= 00
O
O
Lr)
O
Lo
't
O
O O
M
7 LQ?
Ln
N
N
M
,T
Ln
M
Ln
N
M
CO
N
M
r-
N M
M
U O -0
C N U-
0 L
U � �
a�
0
m a) is
(B 0 �'
0')C(0
t(0
0
0000
(6
7 N N U-
E N 00
L
L
(B O
fV
N
to
N
N
N
N
N
> O
CO
Co
0 CU
CO
O
O
N
N
N
N_
P and U Lands Restoration Site Phase 3 T-3 PCS Phosphate Company, Inc.
Fourth Annual Report May 2018

P
P and U Lands Restoration Site Phase 3 T-4 PCS Phosphate Company, Inc.
Fourth Annual Report May 2018
0
LL)
r -
n
0
LL)
X
X
LL)
N
A
0
Ln
N
Ln
X
X
N_
n
0
Ln
N
X
X
X
X
6
CD
v
O
O
O j
CO 0) Q
CO
N
00
O
rl-
O
M
V
O w N a 0
f�
N
4
00
O
r-
N
O
N
a
U N O >
L
Ln
N
M
M N
LL)
CO
O
N
(O
M
M
M
M
U)0,
N
N
N
N
M
i
i
L?
(O
00
i
L?
(O
'T
M
N
(6
N
Ln M
CO
M
M
LO
N
�
00
M
00
,:I-
M
N
L 5
M
00
O
N
M O
r
N
NIn
N
N
N
r`
O)
M
N
N
N
Ln
O
M
M
M
U N 00
f N
CO -O j U
O L O 0)
L6
r-
CO
00
O
O M
M
M
O
O
M
O
00
N
(O
O
U O -0
C fV LL
O -r-
C)
U 3
a�
0
> a? co
.7
Ln
C1400
Ln
0')0')Ln
O
000
1-
V
00
7 O N LL
E 00
L
L
(B O
N
r`
L N
N
rl-
O
r—
U
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
2� O >
U O
(B6
0 CU
M
It
LA
(4
ti
CO
Cn
O
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
M
0-
a
a
a
a
0-
P
P and U Lands Restoration Site Phase 3 T-4 PCS Phosphate Company, Inc.
Fourth Annual Report May 2018

P and U Lands Restoration Site Phase 3 T-5 PCS Phosphate Company, Inc.
Fourth Annual Report May 2018
0
LC)
r—
n
0
LC)
x
X
X
X
LC)
N
A
0
Ln
N
Ln
X
X
N_
n
0
Ln
N
r
6
CO
V
O
O
ZT j
U-0
p CU N p 0
06
N
C15
06
06
M
a
N p >
L
LO M
r�
O �,.�
O
O
Cl)
�
M M
Lt)
M
00
CO
U
N
N
N
M
N
00
N
LO N
N O
N
N
a)
V
Ln
I
Lr')
CO
i
CQ
co
00
i
CO
00
dO
Cp
N
00
M Cb
N
LSA
M
- Cb
c0
LA ('')
N
c0
LA
M
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N N
N
N
N
N
Co
N
Ln
N
67
M
N
r --
O
N
O N M
f N
-O j U
O L O O
0 0
CO
Co
7 O
M
N Cfl
O
O
O Cfl
O
N
O
LO
(fl
O
O M
�t
O
Lf)
LQ?
Lo
N
M
r�
M
M
r--
Lo
M
M
r-
0
O -0
C N U-
0 L
U � �
a�
0
N N (6
O
(A
Ln
00
O
N
O
(B p �'
Cfl
f�
N0
N
(6 2� c N
r
N
—
N
N
7 N N U-
E oo
L
L
fV
N
rn
N
N
N
N
N
N
U O
CO
Co -0
0 Ca
M
MM
MLO
CO
P and U Lands Restoration Site Phase 3 T-5 PCS Phosphate Company, Inc.
Fourth Annual Report May 2018

P and
Pak u Lands Restoration Site Phase 3 GB PCS Phosphate Company, Inc.
Fourth Annual Report May 2018
\
\
\
\
x
x
x
x
x
\
/
/
x
w
\
\
/
x
\
}
0
C/)�
\\°CO
/k
00
R
n
o
R
o
g
e
S E
/
CO%
\
\
\o
ƒ
���g5�
_
e CO
w_
n=
d
Lf) r/
n w=
d
a_ n
d
w_ n
n
4
\ /
Q
a
@
e \
\ 0
\
0
/
/
\
/
2
/ \
\
\
\ \
\ \
\
\
CO
\
\ \
CO
# ®
a
&
w a
/
a =
&
n
/
&
m
/
& co
\
\/\
7 3 \ u
ƒk23
0
r
n
o
N =
m
c
o e
It
w e
c
e
c
o
c
c e
\ 2 b 2
a�
a
n��
w�
w�
n=�
n
U) °
U-
0 / /
§
O�2
7�\0
» » n
17- 0-6
�
\
/
/
/
/
3
E oo
/$2^
# o =
} =
@
w
w
w
w
w
w
r
22�
a
a
a
a
a
a
s
® _ $
/\�
2 CU
_
M
\
%
\
&
/
E
I
I
E
E
0-
P and
Pak u Lands Restoration Site Phase 3 GB PCS Phosphate Company, Inc.
Fourth Annual Report May 2018

P and U Lands Restoration Site Phase 3 T-7 PCS Phosphate Company, Inc.
Fourth Annual Report May 2018
0
LO
r -
n
0
LO
X
X
X
x
X
LO
N
A
0
LO
N
LO
x
N_
n
0
Ln
N
r
X
6
O
V
O
j O
-0 C O_
V
O CU
O N a 0
f�
N
00
N
M
N
00
N
N
M
a
N O >
L
GO
M
00
M
O
rl-
M
O
O CO
(O
M
O
M
-
Cl)
M a7
C.0
O
N
N
N
N
N
N
—
N
O
N
r
y
i
LO
i
LO
i
LS�
CO
i
Ln
-
�
L6
0
00
N
6
N
00
N
6
N
V
00
M
N
00
N
— �
N
N
00
N
f�
—
N
—N
"b
N
4 M
N
N
N
O
N
—
�
=
CO
—
O
N
Ln
O
L;)
N
00
O
N
N
r
O
O N 00
f N
CO -O j U
O L O O
D
7 m LOO
W
O
N
O
O
LSA
LO
CO
ao
O
r-
It
�
r`
�
N
CO
—
M
O
�
CO
N N —
M M
M
f�
Cl)
�
CO N
Nt
U O
C N LL
O -r-
C)
U 3
a�
CO CU 0
0
m °� (.0
C)
o
M00
00
O
co
O
r--
7 N N LL
E 00
N
L
L
(O O
04
r`
L N
N '
O
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
O
ma
Co CO
Co O
LO
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
a
0-
a
a_
a
0-
0-
P and U Lands Restoration Site Phase 3 T-7 PCS Phosphate Company, Inc.
Fourth Annual Report May 2018

Pak u Lands Restoration Site Phase 3 se PCS Phosphate Company, Inc.
Fourth Annual Report May 2018
/
\
/
\
x
x
x
x
x
\
/
/
x
w
2
\
C14
\
}
0
c = \ »
\\°°f\
«
o
=
w
o
0
ƒ
/ / \ / \
\
CO
\
q
\
\
_
Q/
\
Q
2
\
U)
G\
a—
N&\
a
N a
a N
/
=
a\
$\
C9
a
\
a
c
/
\
/ \
\
\
c \
\
\
N \
\
\ \
\
_
\
\
\
&
/
\
&
/
/
&
/
/
& _
&
»
_
w
w
w
a
&
\/\
7 3 \ u
ƒk23
n
#n
t#
o
I=
n
It
It r
m/
N
e
e
\ 2 b 2
2 a#
2
7 a
o%
a#
e—
w
a
w
U) C °
±
§ /
O�2
7�\0
°+ > ° =
\
a
r
r
6
3
\
0
&
\
\
/
/
%\
/$n
# o =
} � r-
\
\
\
\
\
\
22�
® _ $
-0
Co\
2 CU
2
2
_
Q
/
2
$
\
\
\
k
\
\
I
I
I
(L
I
I
Pak u Lands Restoration Site Phase 3 se PCS Phosphate Company, Inc.
Fourth Annual Report May 2018

P and U Lands Restoration Site Phase 3 T-9 PCS Phosphate Company, Inc.
Fourth Annual Report May 2018
0
LO
r—
n
0
LO
x
x
X
x
LO
N
A
0
LO
N
LO
x
x
N_
n
0
LO
N
r
6
O
V
X
O
O
O j
`
(O
O O N a 0
�
00
N
O
M
N
N
y
00
MIt
M
a
N O >
L
M
O
rl-
L,.)
O
f�
M rl
LO CO
LO
M c0
O
O
M
(0
U
�?
N
\
r
I4
N
N O
N
- N
Q
-
N
M
N
N
y
c?n
(O
00
LO
(p
00
(O
00
LO
00
Op
M
N
00
V M
N
Z
00
LO M
N
00
LO
CO
CO
N
O
r
N
N
00
—
N
N
N N
ti O
M
N
N
N N
ti
O
N
N
N
ti
N
O N Co
f N
-O j U
O L O O
0M
O
N
O
00
O
LO
-'tM
(O
Q
0
O (O
"t
N
O
LO
CO
C4
Z
M
CO
r-
U O-0
C fV U-
0 L
U � �
a�
0
OO O O
CO
rl-
O
O
O
00
(O O �'
r—
O
O
—
N
O
N
(6 2� c N
—
N
—
N
N
7 O N U-
E M
L
L
(O O
fV
r`
to
N
N
N
N
N
N
(n Z O
ma
Co CO
CU0
L~O
LO
LOO
CD
LO
CD
CD
P and U Lands Restoration Site Phase 3 T-9 PCS Phosphate Company, Inc.
Fourth Annual Report May 2018

Pak u Lands Restoration Site Phase 3 am PCS Phosphate Company, Inc.
Fourth Annual Report May 2018
\
\
\
\
x
x
x
x
x
x
\
/
9
\
\
\
C14
\
}
0
C/)
\°
®
^
o
a\
ƒ
/ \
\ /
%
\
\
\
\
\/
_
=
n o==
r=
m
e
Q&&
e=
e
a
n o
C&
e
U)
g&—
6
a&&
--\
7
g »
_
$
=
a
$
N/
'C'34,
\
\/
\
\\
\\
\
\o
\
/
=
/
_a
/
00
/\
\\\\
w /
a
w
&
r--
/a
00 \/
\
CO
7 3 \ u
ƒk23
n
o w
t
o
o
m\
o
7
r
t
o
o
c\
o o�
= e
\\±
Q
n a#=
n
n#
c
n
n
U) L
±
§ / /
O32
7 \0
» » n
r.0
\/
N
/
\
\/
M a)
§ % / \
/$2^
# o =
} N LL
@
w
w
w
w
w
w
2 2�
a
a
a
a
a
a
® _ $
/\-0
2 CU
7
$
$
%
$
(D
\
\
\
\\
\
I
E
E
I
E
E
Pak u Lands Restoration Site Phase 3 am PCS Phosphate Company, Inc.
Fourth Annual Report May 2018

P and U Lands Restoration Site Phase 3 T-11 PCS Phosphate Company, Inc.
Fourth Annual Report May 2018
0
LL)
r—
n
0
LL)
x
x
x
x
x
x
LL)
N
A
0
Ln
N
Ln
N_
n
0
Ln
N
r
x
6
O
V
x
O
O
O j
N
CO O Q
O
N
O
O
Ln
O
C)
`
O
O O N a 0
O
f�
M
f�
M
f_
N
CO
V
00
N
O
M
a
O N O >
L
C14 CY)
C14
O
O
O
00
CO
O
U
N
N
N
N
Lf')
Q
N
L?
N
y
CO
Ln
GO
00
i
i
a7
CO
00
i
i
a7
LL�
00
i
i
a7
00
i
i
Z
00
i
(O
00
i
i
a7
0
r N
00
N
(D
N
00
N
(D
N
00
N
0000
N
00
N
LO
O7
N
00
N 00
N
(O
N
M V
N
CO
O
N
CO
O
N
CO
O
N
00
CO
N 00
N
00
O
r
U N 00
:Tf N
CO -O j U
O L O O
-0 D
LO
O Lr)
LO
oo
O
oo
O
M
M
67
O
00
N
LO
0
00
O
N O
7 L �
CO
�
M
�
M
f�
�
N
a7
�
N
V
r-
ti
�
M
U O -0
C N LL
O -r-
C)
U 3 U
a�
0
(1)M OM
LO 0 -'
O
O
N
LC)
r---
f�
Q0O
00
LLO
7 O N LL
E o0
L
L
(O O
04
p-
N
'
� U
O
N
�
N
P
N
N
O
�
N
N
U Z O
ma
Co CO
Co CU
Q
�
M
It
LO
CO
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
d
d
d
d
0-
a_
d
0-
P and U Lands Restoration Site Phase 3 T-11 PCS Phosphate Company, Inc.
Fourth Annual Report May 2018

P and U Lands Restoration Site Phase 3 T-12 PCS Phosphate Company, Inc.
Fourth Annual Report May 2018
0
LO
r—
n
0
LO
X
X
X
X
x
LO
N
A
0
LO
N
LO
X
X
X
N_
n
0
LO
N
r
6
CO
V
O
O
O j
OO Q
CO
N
N
O
Il -
V
CU
O O N a 0
M
00
N
f-
M
M
N
f-�
M
M
N
f-�
M
f�
a
O N O >
L
OM
00
O
CO �
O
CO
CO
LO
O
CO
M
N
N
U
N
N
N
N
N
Lf)
N
N
N
d)
In
y
CO
CO
00
CON
Lr)
�
a7
CO
�
1
N
00
0?
i
(fl
00
i
V
0f
00
Cq
i
O
N
N
N
N
N
(D N
N
N
00
N
N
N CO
N
N
N
N
CO
N
M
N
ti
M
N
O
O
N
CO \O
N
00
O
N
ti
O
N
N
00
O
O N00
f N
-O j U
O L O O
(�6 0
CO
O
LO
O
00
O
LO
00 N
LO
LO
(fl
N
LO
O M
M
~
00
O
O
7 L Q
M
f--
c0
—
M
N
Cfl
—
N
M N
-,:I-
Cfl
M
LO
U O -0
C N U-
0 L
U � �
a�
0
- 0
Co
0
00
00
�_
o
O �'
N
00
f�
M
O
MLO
?i c N
N
r
r
r
N
r
r
r
7 O N U-
E 00
L
L
(O O
fV
P-
L N
N '
O
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
O
ma
Co CO
Co CU
00
ti
ti
00
00
_00
_N
_00
>
>
D
D
Z)
D
Z)
a
a
a
a
a_
a_
a
CL
P and U Lands Restoration Site Phase 3 T-12 PCS Phosphate Company, Inc.
Fourth Annual Report May 2018

Pak u Lands Restoration Site Phase 3 a» PCS Phosphate Company, Inc.
Fourth Annual Report May 2018
\a
/ (
ƒ
\ \
/ /
3 M
0 0
0) 0)
\ \
E E
k f
9 0
\
\
\
\
x
x
x
x
x
\
/
/
x
x
w
\
\
/
x
x
\
}
x
0
c = \ »
I
z o=\$
0
w
m
o
o
=
n
y
r
«
)
/ ) 0
=002-0
\
6
\
\
®
\
-
\
\
ƒ���5�
_
\
2
\
\
/
% %
\ %
f \
2
\
U)
=
@
r=
4
G$
\ 0
a
—
7
a
4<$
a
C
/
�_
\
\
4
\
G_ \
\
\ \
4
\ \
\
\
c
\
\
c/
\
\
®
\
&
a
\
& \
& 0
&
&
O
\
&
® /
\
\00
/\
CO 7 3 \ u
ƒk23
o
e
o=/=
e
c
w
w o
m
7/
e
c\
o
\=ne
\±
r
r
a
w m n
a
w a
r
2
Cl)
U) °
±
§ / /
O32
7�\0
» » n
\
LO
CO
CO
/G
\E\\
CO
//
_
\
E % / \
/$2^
# o =
} 04 �
2 2
N
\
\
\
CO
\
\
r
\
\
® _ $
/\�
2 CU
$
00
7
_
$
G
/
§
%
$
\
\
k
\
\
\
k
\
\
\
\
I
(L
E
I
I
(L
E
E
I
I
Pak u Lands Restoration Site Phase 3 a» PCS Phosphate Company, Inc.
Fourth Annual Report May 2018
\a
/ (
ƒ
\ \
/ /
3 M
0 0
0) 0)
\ \
E E
k f
9 0

P and U Lands Restoration Site Phase 3 T-14 PCS Phosphate Company, Inc.
Fourth Annual Report May 2018
0
LO
r -
n
0
LO
x
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
LO
N
A
0
Ln
N
Ln
N_
n
0
Ln
N
r
6
O
V
O
j O
O C3 O
0')
M
N
O
O
M
(n O
w a 0
M
N
NN
N
N
NNO
V
N
CO
a
O
N O >
L
O
LO M
N
MO
00
L,.
O
00
r�
L,.
O
r--
L,.
O
00
L,.
O
LO
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
GO
i
L?i
CO
O
i
L?
O
i
L?L?
O
i
L?O
i
LOO
i
LO
0
ao
aD
d7
N
O O
a0
op
a7
N
a0
00
a7
N
O
a0
00
a7
N
00
(O
a7
N
00
00
07
N
00
N
N
O
O
r
N O
�
N
N
c
O
O
r
N
N
co
00
O
r
N
N
N
N
00
O
r
N
N
00
O
r
00
N
00
O
r
N
N
U N 00
f N
CO -O j U
O L O O
7 O
O
LQ?
m
r-- m
M
00
co
00
r-
co
F-
co
00
co
r -
U O -0
C N LL
O -r-
C)
U 3
a�
0
N O (a
O
O
O
Ln
Ln
Ln
CO
O
CO
LB 0
00
Lr)
00
O
O
t0
r�
O
(6
7 N N LL
E 00
N
L
L
(B O
fV
r`
N
U
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
U O
CO
M -0
0 CU
00
r
GO
rl-
00
O
O
N
O
O
O
O
O
O04
r
_
C14
C14
C14
C14
04
M
D
Z:)
Z:)
D
a
a-
a-
a
a-
a
a_
0-
P and U Lands Restoration Site Phase 3 T-14 PCS Phosphate Company, Inc.
Fourth Annual Report May 2018

2 2 r
\ \_ / %
/ C14 (0C14
a = /
Q \ / %
\
mm�=
1�
W10
\
\
>
\I
EI
C')
\
o
\
0
\
=
\
2
%
b n
\
Q
7
7
7 /
\
/
\
\
/ \
00
&
&
o
G
7
4(D
&
w
\0?
\
\
L
/
E
F
F
\
1�
W10
\
\
>
\I
EI
x
@
LO
g
=
\
\
\
\
Q
\
\
/
\
Q
00
7
G
7
4(D
o
w
\0?
\
\
L
\
^
�
/
\
)
4
}
}
a
\
\
/
g
>CO
x
@
Pak u Lands Restoration Site Phase 3 se PCS Phosphate Company, Inc.
Fourth Annual Report May 2018
LO
g
=
r.0
\
Q
/
Q
7
G
7
4(D
\
\0?
\
\
\
/
/
&
4
>
a
\
a
w
/
/
%
CO
Pak u Lands Restoration Site Phase 3 se PCS Phosphate Company, Inc.
Fourth Annual Report May 2018

%\
f \
\\O
2 / (
2�£
\\k
m
%\ E
°\
(CL 2 R
(
7 >1 0)
=yg\
£ =n
\ c: 'k
\ )
£tet[
k\\0
= 7 0 $
0 = _ _
\ P / N
o ®® o
7 E.E S
E o 2
J) E = E
I 0 %
M \ .§ _
If\\
\/n
M = o
L)
=23f
7 0 -0 \
e°cs
\ 0 .�
nnES
\7C
.7 \ k 0
�t3#
-yo=
§I§a
.§\�\
% m
.�.§ 4 \
}\M
0)
0 >
\
F 0
w E
CL
E % = o
-0£\
\ E -0 0
M —0
Pand uLands
Fourth Annual
ƒ
\
ƒ
\
a)^
( /
: \
_0 \
I 7
\
\
C.0
\
5 77
\�CO f\\
B E CN 2 0
ƒN0�
&
\
c
\R»
\f\0
>3(0e
5 0
} % ±
o=m%
O ±—
CU 0>
ƒk�(.0
\2/\
E % / \
C)
CO o =
\/\
/g04
®® \
2050
(0
$
4
Restoration Site Phase 3
#M,
94:
q
\
$
k
D
a
x
CO
/
® 2
N
n
\
/
\
q
$
w
/
x
CO
x
/
6
\ \
\
\
00
CO
k
\
\
&
a
2
I
/
/ &
/
It
%
q
\
$
k
D
a
x
CO
/
/
2
x
CO
\
q
%
M
x
x
CO
x
�
T-1
\
k
�
a
?
x
U')
y
z
#
2
Q
/
\
CO
\
UQ
CO
/
/
2
/
CO
\
q
%
M
$
$
CO
w
/
6
00
CO
k
\
\
&
a
2
I
/
(L
fL
�
T-1
\
k
�
a
?
x
U')
y
z
#
2
Q
/
\
CO
\
UQ
PCS Phosphate Company, Inc.
May 2018
CO
/
\
\
q
%
M
�
\
CO
/
\
(L
fL
a_
PCS Phosphate Company, Inc.
May 2018

0
Ln
r—
n
0
Ln
x
x
Ln
N
A
0
LO
N
LO
x
x
N
A
O
Ln
N
r
(6
Al
V
C
O _
p CO .O
% L
C (Ory CO 0) 0
M
00
N C Q
C'40
i 0
ti
N
Ln
M
a0
r
o0
r
-2
a o
O �.
Ln
N
(DM
N
M
N
M
O
(D
N
M
y
N
N
N
N
0
N
N
c N
N
(N
\
M
M
N
a)
LO
(O
r-
Ln
Cfl
r
CO
(B
D
a0
M
Lr)
N
a0
N
N
M
N
Ln
N
N
N
N 00
N
M
Ln
CSO
N
N
N
N
M
N
N
CO
O
N
Lf)
CO
M
N
"t
Ln
CO
O
N
(D CO
O
O
cB O O
L
(.O
0 0
ti
�
N
N
M
Ln
CA
M
Ln
N
N
N
O
O
't
N
Ln
o0
M Ln
O
M
M
M
N
ti
M
O
�
O
M
N O N LL
O L (q N
a�
m
-a
D
m
1--
Ln
00
M p
(B 3: c O
N
N
N
N
N
N
7 O N LL
00
U N
L
L
CO O La)
0 N
(�
N
N
N
N
O
CO
(a
� (B
f-
00
O
O
N
Z:)
D
a
a
a
a
P and U Lands Restoration Site Phase 3 T-17 PCS Phosphate Company, Inc.
Fourth Annual Report May 2018

\R»
ƒ
04
\
04
w
m
\
k
\f\�
_\
k
_
k
_
\
s
\ M / 2
/ \ / $
� \ E $
CO / %
�
ƒ
/ \ \ / %
&
®
x
x
x
x
\
§/(n%
A
O 3:1-
—(3)
(
(3)
/
0
\
/
x
o
w
>\\\
2
/
/
\
A
cli
04
/
0
04
§ % / \
7
/\a~
g
2
(3)�_
\
CO o =
\/\
9
C.0
5\ 77
w
w
w
w
/gam
a
\$f\\
o
ƒ
r
\
g
\
0
/
n
\
B E2 e
2050
Co
ƒ�0
&
c c E
2&
w 9r
t—
t e f
m
r o N
N&±&
n CO
$
a \
'
2
/ $
n
/ \ f a
4 \
/ $ $
CO
c
4
$ -
N&&
0% 6*
e 9 9^
r r Jƒ
04^ k ^
N 6
04
w 6 6 6+
^
9 9 04 9
& 3$/
E«/@$
2 c/
A 6 6�
4 a c/
\R»
04
\
04
w
m
\
k
\f\�
_\
k
_
k
_
_\
k
_
s
\ M / 2
/ \ / $
� \ E $
CO / %
�
/ ? \
/ \ \ / %
&
\ } \ L
§/(n%
O 3:1-
—(3)
(3)
0
>\\\
2
/
/
%
\ = »
cli
04
/
0
04
§ % / \
/\a~
(3)�_
CO o =
\/\
9
w
w
w
w
w
/gam
a
04
04
04
04
® ® \
2050
Co
G
04
\
04
w
m
\
k
k
_
_\
k
_
k
_
_\
k
_
s
a
I
E
E
0-
P and
Pak u Lands Restoration Site Phase 3 a» PCS Phosphate Company, Inc.
Fourth Annual Report May 2018

0
0
X
X
LO
r—
x
M
\
T
M
n
r
4
M
w
N
0
M
\
M
N
CO
M
r
M
-
CO
LO
U')—
r
,I -M
N
It
CO
N
(O
N
A
N
C
O
N
LO
N
U
L6
O
N
O
n
_
8-°
0
a
a
a
a
N
r
X
c�
(6
Al
cB
M O O
V
P and U Lands Restoration Site Phase 3
C
O _
p CO .O
%L
T-19
C y CO O N
N OO_
O
Fourth Annual Report
i �N 0
a
o O
L
May 2018
0)
L
0
ti I O I M I U I a0
ti O M Co
N r r r r
O
M
D
N N
3 M
M 40
X
X
x
x
M
\
T
M
O
m
ti I O I M I U I a0
ti O M Co
N r r r r
O
M
D
N N
3 M
M 40
CO
00
N
N
M
M
N
O
M
MTo
N
Cfl
O
N
———-"-
co
M
\
T
M
O
m
r
4
M
w
N
O
r
4
M
M
\
M
N
CO
M
r
M
-
CO
N
a0
N
N
U')—
r
,I -M
N
It
CO
N
(O
(* O
N N
(b N
co
_N
a
a
a
a
a
a
c�
cB
M O O
P and U Lands Restoration Site Phase 3
T-19
PCS Phosphate Company, Inc.
Fourth Annual Report
May 2018
L
L(D
N O N LL
ON
a�
m
-a
-D 0
OO O
L O
CO
O
O')
0
CO
_� ���
O
O
CO
N
7 O N LL
E 7 Cb
U N
L
L
M O
04 r ­
0 N
O
N
N
N
N
N
N
O O
O
Q "' M
U
U
N
N
OM
N
M
M
>
2
_N
a
a
a
a
a
a
c�
P and U Lands Restoration Site Phase 3
T-19
PCS Phosphate Company, Inc.
Fourth Annual Report
May 2018

0
LO
x
r—
n
0
LSA
x
x
x
x
LO
N
A
0
LO
N
LO
x
x
N
A
O
Ln
N
r
(6
Al
V
C
O
O CO .O
C y CO0) O
O
O
O
M
N Q00
i C N O 0
N
O
CD
0o
r
O
O
(D
O
r
00
M
a o
O �.
I-
O_
—
co
LO
Q0
00 (o
LO
rn
r`
cn
M
N
N
L�
O
N
N
-
-
N
O
Ln
CO
;
Cfl
—
ifl c--
'T
L?
CO
D
00
N
Cf)
N
LOLf)
N
O
6
N
N
�
M
N
N
N N
N
N
OD
67
N
00
N
N
N
N
L1)
Cfl
00
O
N
M a0
N
C-4
N CO
M
(fl
O
r
N
(D
M
LB O 0)
L
(3) L
O
O
ti
N
O
(N
r (0
00
M
I
0)
M
N
rl-
(O
N
US O
M
LO
M
00
LO M
M
N
N
N O N LL
C N
OcnN
U '—
(3)
m
Co 0
� D
O O O (O
O
N
O
fl-
O
O
I-
' M p
N
00
LO
(O
00
00
LO
(B 2� c O
N
N
N
N
—
N
7 O N LL
00
U N
L
L
CO O L�
0 � N
t�
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
O (3)
O
(a .0-
� (B
N
CO
LP>
(O
h
00
CO
M
CO
M
Cl)
Cl)
CO
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
P and U Lands Restoration Site Phase 3 T-20 PCS Phosphate Company, Inc.
Fourth Annual Report May 2018
O
E
Q
a)
U)
O
O
to
7
O)
7
Q
O
al
C
En
U
E
c�
0

s I
/
Pak u Lands Restoration Site Phase 3
Fourth Annual Report
a
■9PA
a
x
�
$
% / "t
/
\
C14
k
D
a
x
9
I-
Q
LO
�
n
G
e
o
o/
+
\
\
\
/
\
\
\
\
\
A
®
&Q
©
6
e
x
x
x
%
A
0
/
)
^
\
0
_0
\
J
R
2
Al
f
\
0 7 7
\U)f/k
2 E 2 °
\
\
\
ƒ 0
t00
&
U")
/
�
\
N
m
_
/
w
y
mw$
(0
6
CO
\
\
k
\
% \
N
\
_9
/ \
&
=
m
&
$ _
/
&
e =
/
\R=
\fk�
.>$�o
= \ 3
I-
/
?
%
/ Q
%
n
o
\ /
%
5
\ } d LL
\ \�
2�\3
Q)_ o
n
n
c
\2/\
�
&
\
§ % / %
/\®^
\ 0 =
LL
\\w
9
w
w
w
f .§
C\1
04
CN
* = I
m 5 0
\
3�a
:
%
q
w
\
k
k
k
s I
/
Pak u Lands Restoration Site Phase 3
Fourth Annual Report
a
■9PA
a
x
�
$
% / "t
/
\
C14
k
D
a
x
9
I-
Q
�
n
G
e
o
o/
+
\
\
/
\
\
\
\
\
A
®
&Q
©
6
e
$
\
\
g 7
k \
CL
0-
s Phosphate Company, Inc.
May 2018

0
LO
rin
0
Ln
x
x
x
Ln
N
A
0
Ln
N
LO
X
N
A
O
L1')
N
X
(4
Al
(D
V
C
_
Orn
O O ,O
i1 L
C U)(6 pJ N
fl-
O
f�
C Q
L N O 0
CO
N
M
N
00
N
f�
N
N p
O L
O)
M
0�
O
LO
O
O
CO 00
(D
N
O
L?
M
N
L?
r�
CY)N
M
LO
O
On
�
CO
N
�f
N
OON
N
LO
(O
O
W
N
(
0Ofr
N
N
O
Lf
CO
I--
NN
N
N
(fl
ti
—
M
N
OMC
N
O
r
N
N
O00
M
N
(D
f--
00
O
(6 O N
L
"' L
O
CO
O
N
(D
LO
O
M
L1�
(0
O
L1�
rn
CO
N
a0
M
f�
LSA
rn
M
O
M
a0
f�
ap
Ln
LO
O
M
VO N
N O N LL
C N aD
0 N
3 '
a�
M 0
O
CO (fl
.O.
00
N
O
00
(0 0 -6
N
00
tt
00
7 O N LL
E 00
U N
L
L
ca O LL
N
ti
N
f—
fl-
f-
LO
Il -
to
N
N
N
N
N
O N
U O
COC—Co -0
0 C6
>
>
Z:)
Z:)
a
a
a
a
a
P and U Lands Restoration Site Phase 3 T-22 PCS Phosphate Company, Inc.
Fourth Annual Report May 2018

\
\
/
�
t
\
/ \
\
\
\
& =
a
&
CO
/
\
/
\ %
7
\
\
x
x
x
x
\
\
/
x
&
\
\
w
Al
f
\
0 7 7
\U)f/k
0')
®
�
2 E 2 °
\
\
\
7
\
ƒ N 0
t
&
/
2
-
2
-
\
/
2
9
t
\ /
$
2»
/
2»
\
2»
2»
* 0
a«
CO
\4
\
\
%
%
\
\
\
\
4
ob N \
\ \
\
a
\
e
@
2
9/
\
/
@
$
& o
\R=
\fk�
:-r- \ 3
o
0/
7
to
CD
t
o
7/
e
w
7
7/
2
5
Q$
Q
Q
r-
0
} dCU
0\'��
2�0
\\/\
\
\
\
\
\
§ % / %
/\®^
\ 0 =
(D
9
w
w
w
w
w
f .§
C\1
a
N
N
N
* = I
En 5 0
>'3a
2
g
2
2
_
G
a
a
a
a
a
g
94:
\
\
k
_
I
Pak u Lands Restoration Site Phase 3 Ga PCS Phosphate Company, Inc.
Fourth Annual Report May 2018
\
/
�
t
\
/ \
\
\
\
& =
a
&
CO
/
/
\ %
7
\
\
k
_
I
Pak u Lands Restoration Site Phase 3 Ga PCS Phosphate Company, Inc.
Fourth Annual Report May 2018

P and
Pak u Lands Restoration Site Phase 3 a& PCS Phosphate Company, Inc.
Fourth Annual Report May 2018
\
k
n
\
x
x
x
%
A
\
/
x
x
&
\
\
\
x
Al
f
\
0 7 7
£$n\(
f
o
o
CO
oCD
/
U E /
2
\
ƒ
\
a
0')
k
ƒ ./ \ %
>
&
/
\
N
7
®
\
%
»
\
/
/
/
F
\
f
En
LO
c
*
d
o
+
/
\
»
\
\
$
CO
k
\
\
&
CO
k
/
\
/
\
6
/
\
\
\
«
00
a
&
$
\
_
»
\R=
\fk�
\ k \ 2
$
/
q
%
q
/
/
%
/
E
7
2
%
$
\
E
/
$
\
\ } d L
\ \�
2�\3
_ _
\\/\
— -
\
\
\
/
�
\
\
§ % / %
/\®^
\ o =
LL
\\w
9
=
w
C14
w
t
w
t
w
04
w
A
w
C\1
m 5 /
3a
�
LO
/
S
_
2
G
w
2
k
\
k
\
k
k
\
a
I
a
I
a
a
0-
P and
Pak u Lands Restoration Site Phase 3 a& PCS Phosphate Company, Inc.
Fourth Annual Report May 2018

0
Ln
r -
n
0
Ln
X
X
X
X
X
x
LO
N
A
0
LO
N
Ln
N
A
O
Ln
N
r
(6
Al
V
C
O _
p CO .O
c y CO O N
O
N
N
O
00
N Q
C'40
i 0
N
It
O
M
ti
M
O
M
O
N
-2
a o
O �.
00
O
(O
a0
O
NM
N
(fl
00
N
O
(O
y
N
M
N
r
\O
N
r
N
N
N
N
N
N
O
OO
Ln
O
CO
CO
O
r
CO O
(D
O
D
co
N
O
O
N
co
N CO
N
O
Ln
N
O
N CO
07
N
OLn
-
4
N
N
N
O
N
N
O
N
O o0
—
O
N
N
co
O
N
iV
(0 o0
N—
O
N
N
o
CV
-
N
O
CV
CV
O
cV
N-
cB O O
L
>� L( I
—
—
't
O
N
O
LC)
Ln CO
It
't
O rl-
It
O
O ti
O
M
O
It
UO N
C\1It
CO
00
M
00
It Lr)
It
00
N M't
CO
M Ln
M
C)
N O N U-
C
O cq N
a�
m
-a
D
OO O O
O
N
O
O
O
M p -'
rl
Ln
M
It
r --
(B 3: c O
N
N
N
N
N
N
7 O N U-
E O
U N
L
L
CO O �L
� � N
N
N
N
N
N
N
O O
O
W CO
� (B
_
W
to
to
to
to
a
a
a
a
a
a
P and U Lands Restoration Site Phase 3 T-25 PCS Phosphate Company, Inc.
Fourth Annual Report May 2018

.g
0
0
z
\
\
\
\
x
x
x
x
\
\
9
@
%
A
\
/
x
Al
f
\
0 >1 7 7
\$f/\
m
o
w
R
2 E 2 °
\
\
\
\
%
ƒ %
t00
&
C\1
G
®
^
\
/
\
/
\
00
/
f
m
®
\
*
\
\ »
$
/
\ a
\
@
\ \
w $
@
\
\
w
\
$
/
/
f
f\�\
f-
�\
\
\
C14
\\
\
7
%
\
't
m
_ »
/
_ «
/
_ ©
/
c
/
=
6
\R=
\fk�
\ k \ 2
/
f
\
E
/ \
$
/ /
$
CO
\
%
/
\
/
2
\
\ } d LL
0�
2�\3
_ CO
\\/\
_
\
\
\
\
§ % / %
/\®^
\ 0 =
LL
\\w
9
2
w
w
w
w
f .§ �
04
04
04
04
* = I
m 5 0
3a
�
F
C14
F
/
_
�
\
k
k
\
\
I
a
a
I
I
x
K
7
z
\
LO
n
I-
k
_
0-
P and
Pak u Lands Restoration Site Phase 3 am PCS Phosphate Company, Inc.
Fourth Annual Report May 2018

Pa
FOL
x
r 0,
N
00 N �
00 C3)
N N N
N Cp 00 O
r
04 LO M
It LSA M
r
O
It
N
x
O
O
O
r
N
00
N
N
N
00
N
N
00
N
T-27
X
00
0
O
O
LO
M
rin
—
—
N
Lp
f
0
Ln
O
�
CA
00
LSA
x
L()
N
N
—
N
M
CV
—00Fz
A
00
O
N
N
N
C:
o
O
O
N
CO
U
N
�
O
N
O
n
_0
0
N
C4
Al
CO
V
C
_
Orn
O O ,O
i1 L
C U) CO 0
O
L N O 0
o6
N
N0�
O L
L
0)
I-
N
O
.O
r
L
r
CO
Q
00
N
i
LO
N
N
Cfl
CO O N
L � Q
CA
00
N N N LL
C N aD
0 N
3 '
a�
M 0
�
m CO
> L(O
6 p N
Cfl
7 N N LL
E oo
U N
L
L
ca
O LL
N
ti
N
rl-
N
O N
U O
S
CO
Q C6
CO
r-
1
�
s
a
id U Lands Restoration Site Phase
3
rth Annual
Report
x
r 0,
N
00 N �
00 C3)
N N N
N Cp 00 O
r
04 LO M
It LSA M
r
O
It
N
x
O
O
O
r
N
00
N
N
N
00
N
N
00
N
T-27
X
00
N
O
O
M
N
—
—
N
Lp
f
O
�
CA
00
LSA
Cfl
04
N
N
—
- N
M
CV
—00Fz
N
00
O
O 00 M M M
CO — — LSA M
CO
N
N
a
X
4
V
LO
O O O N LO
0 N Lfj N
CO
CO
N
N
O
Co
D
0 -
PCS
PCS Phosphate Company, Inc.
May 2018
N
00Cfl
M
N
N
(
N
N
N
�
O
O
CO
r
LO
O O O N LO
0 N Lfj N
CO
CO
N
N
O
Co
D
0 -
PCS
PCS Phosphate Company, Inc.
May 2018

0
LO
r—
n
0
LO
x
x
N
A
0
LO
N
LO
x
x
x
x
N
A
O
N
r
x
(6
Al
V
C
O _
p CO v7 .O
% L
CO 0)a)
r
r
r
0)
r—
rl-
N C CL
i �NO 0
N
N
M
O
a o
O �.
M
0\0 O
N
U)
O
M
O
00
It
(DN
N
N
(D
O
�
m
f—
�
O
L?
W O
—
N
r
cB
D
N
N 00
O
00
N
N
N
00
N
N (D
6
N
4 N
4
00
N
N
N
(O Co
N
CD
N
N
N
O
N
N
M
—
M
N
O 00
O
—
CO 00
—
M
00
CO
O
M
O
r
r
cB O O
L
.7-"'' L
Ln
M
N
00
M
O
00
00
N ti
O
O N
O
Ln
O
00
O N
CO
.4N
4
O
-'t
It M
M
LO M
LO
It
M
N
N O N LL
ON
a�
m
-a
-
D
00 0 (O
CO
00
LO
00
00
M
M
I
;� M p
(B
O
—
CO00
N
—
N
O
00
7 O N LL
E 00
U N
L
L
CO O �L
r r—
N
'
LO
ti
t�
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
O O
O
W CO
� (B
00
00
00
0000
00
00
CCO
D
Z:)
z:)
Z:)
Z:)
Z:)
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
Uq
Co =
L L
CO
LL
I-
0 O
T �
O al
C C
.T .In
E .E
M M
M t�
0 0
U 'O
P and U Lands Restoration Site Phase 3 T-28 PCS Phosphate Company, Inc.
Fourth Annual Report May 2018

c�
a
P and U Lands Restoration Site Phase 3
Fourth Annual Report
0- a- a
T-29
V
O
X
N
rl-
M
O
0
D
O
O
a
N
O
O
04
LO
—
N
1-
C�)
Q
'-?
r
rl-
Z
63
6
CO
'tT
CO
n
N
N
N
N
-
N
N
0
O
c0
N
r
LO
X
X
X
Ln
N
A
O
C:
o
O
N
U
N
�
O
N
O
n
2
N
r
x
6
(0
V
C
O _
O (U6 rn >1 U) ,O
L
U 0) Q
O
O
O
M
L NO 0
O
M
M
N
O
ti
N
a § N p
O L
O)
e0
N
-
N
00
N
—
LO
� 0)
N
—
— C
O
O
CO
0
e0
N
N C�0
4
NN
c0
LSA N6
N
N
4 4
N
co
N
LO N
N
O
N
N
O CO
O
N
O c0
O
M ao
N
CO CO
O
(0 O N
L
O
Lf) It
It
O
f0 CO
O
i` LO
rl-
r— rl-
O
VO N
O
M
N
ti
N
N O N LL
0CU
a�
0
O
N CO
- c9
r--
Co
Co
' Co -6
(6 3: = O
C.0
N
r
N
O
N
7 O N U-
E - c0
U fn N
L
L
ca
O U-
N
r -
`U Nr--
r--
co
rl-
L U
N
N
N
N
O N
E O
N
0 ca
C
O
U
00
O
a7
0)
c�
a
P and U Lands Restoration Site Phase 3
Fourth Annual Report
0- a- a
T-29
V
O
X
N
rl-
M
00
LO N
N
rl-
CN
Q
'z
LLQ
LO
O It LO M
LO
Cfl
N
N
0')
O
O
D
O
O
a
N
O
O
04
04
—
N
1-
C�)
Q
'-?
r
Z
63
6
CO
'tT
CO
N
N
N
N
-
N
N
c0
O
c0
N
r
00
LO N
N
rl-
CN
Q
'z
LLQ
LO
O It LO M
LO
Cfl
N
N
0')
O
O
D
D
D
a
a
0 -
PCS Phosphate Company, Inc.
PCS
May 2018

Pa
FOL
0
LO
1`
n
0
LO
x
x
x
x
x
L()
N
A
O
C:
o
O
N
U
N
�
O
N
O
n
"0
2
N
r
6
Cfl
V
C
O _
O (U6 O i U) ,O
L
U p)
C
Cl)
'TQ
L NO 0
ti
M
M
ti
N
M
M
N
a N p
O L
O)
't
N M
�
�t
"t
O
O
U)
O CO
O
M
N
— O
a0
N O CO
O
� -
-
-
-
M
M
-
-
- N
M M
N
.O
(D
O
,
C
fl
�
r-
L?
T
Lf)
O
Ln
O
(6
Q
M
N
N O
qt
N
M
N
N
(D
'
-
O
N
a0
N
M M
N
C))
N
00
N
'
N —
O)
O
N
00
N
LO' O)
N - N
N
O a0
N
O
ti
M
N
CO a0
r
N
O a0
O
CV
O 00 O
CO O N
(0
L � Q
") L
1`
00
M 0)
1`
OD
,,
Ln
t
m
r-
CD N
M
Ln
OO
O)
O
OO O)
V� O N
(D
N
—
O
M
�
— 't
M
't LC)
M
CO
M
N N N LL
(n N M
0 N
3 '
a�
M 0
�
Q) a) CO m
LO
rn
00
rn
(6 3: = N
N
N
N
N
7 N N LL
E 00
U N
L
L
ca O LL
N
1`
U
N
N
N
N
N
N N
O O
S
Q C6
S
1`
00
r
(fl
r -
S
0)
CA
O
O
O
_
C14
C14
C14
a
a
a
a
0 -
id
id U Lands Restoration Site Phase
3
T-30
PCS Phosphate
Company, Inc.
rth Annual Report
May 2018

0
O
N
CO
-
-
M
N
N
L9
LO
-T
01,
00
(D
N
N
N
rl-
NLn
M
O
Cp
n
0
LO
x
x
x
x
x
Ln
N
A
0
Ln
N
L(j
N
A
O
Ln
N
r
6
Lfl
V
C
O _
O (06 O U) ,O
i L
UCO 0) Q
O
O
Cl)
00
L NO 0
N
00
N
00
N
00
N
r-�
N
a § N p
O L
0)
00
N
LO
rl-
N
N
r-
04o0
('`4
N O
LO
O
O
O
—
N
r
N
N
r
N
N
r
N
N
9
1�
L?
�
L?
� �
L(�
� �
Ln
COca
LO
N
CO
M 00
N
00
LO (0
N
00
LO 00
N
00
LO
't
N
N
N
a0
N
N
NN
CO M
O
N
N
CO M
O
N
N
N
CO M
O
N
N
N
CO
N
a0
CO O N
(0
L
000
CO
—
LO
O
r—
00 00
— �
O
M
O
r—
00 O
— �
O
M
O
CO
00 O
— LSA
O
M
r-
rl-
Lfl
—
r -
N
VO N
N O N LL
(n N ao
0 N
3 '
a�
M 0
O
00- (D
(D
O
N
(D
(6 N
-
N
N
N
7 O N LL
E 00
U N
L
L
ca O LL
Nr'-
`N
C14
r-
r—
r—
r—
r-
to
N
N
N
N
N
O N
O O
COC—Co -0
0 C6
00
O
O
N
N
C14
C14
C14
C14
04
Z:)
D
D
D
a
a-
0-
0-
a
0
r -
M
N
M — 67
CO N It L[) M
00
CO
N
r -
N
M
r
N
2
D
a
P and U Lands Restoration Site Phase 3 T-31 PCS Phosphate Company, Inc.
Fourth Annual Report May 2018
O
N
CO
-
-
M
N
N
L9
LO
-T
01,
00
(D
N
N
N
N
NLn
M
O
Cp
M — 67
CO N It L[) M
00
CO
N
r -
N
M
r
N
2
D
a
P and U Lands Restoration Site Phase 3 T-31 PCS Phosphate Company, Inc.
Fourth Annual Report May 2018

Pa
FOL
0
LO
rin
0
LO
l()
N
A
O
rZ o
O
N N
U 6
0)
O N
O n
-a
2
0
Uj
N
r
6
Al
Lfl
V
C
O _
O (U6 O U) ,O
> L
N Z7 C Q
i
C'4
OL
a N p >'
O L
L
0)
O
N
c�6
0
CO
O N
O L o
Co
U � 0 N
N O N LL
C N
U 3 ' N
a�
Co
Z3 CSO
Q) CO
E � O N
7 O N LL
E00
U � � N
L
L
O LL
N ti
N
N
O N
>
S O O N
1 0 C6
S p
i
C
O
� U
a� c
ca
s E
i Z3
s �
id U Lands Restoration Site Phase 3
rth Annual Report
T-32
X
C]
x
LO
r
X
X
M
U
U
C
00
m
M
�
Cl)
a0
4
O
6 6
N
O
N Qc
r
N
M 00
C6
o OC
C6
N
N
N
M
't
N
S`
N
CO
N
S`
-
M
-
N
l,n
�
CA
LO
ti
M
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
(.0
N
CD
M
N
CSC)
M
N
CD
rn
00
CA
N
P-
S`
ti
N
N
N
04
Cl)
Of
Of
Of
id U Lands Restoration Site Phase 3
rth Annual Report
T-32
X
C]
LO
r
M
M
U
U
C
00
m
M
�
a0
4
�
6 6
N
N Qc
r
N
M 00
N
o OC
x
x
SI- CO Co CO r = f : I N
CO OD CO LO N M Co
LO
M
N
CO
N
I-
N N
N
M
N
N
00
N
r -
CN
PCS Phosphate Company, Inc.
May 2018
11
N
M
U
U
U
00
m
m
PCS Phosphate Company, Inc.
May 2018

�=
\ \
k/
.\g / 2
/
_\m I
I
% o — o
3
E > $
w
A
=_ =
_ $ o.§
5
R
-0__= £
>
= o o p %
o
---=
---
y = CU
U)
§ $ = S
= (D C _
a)m
U)
a)
CO
> \ k }
_ _£
m
\ &))
[
&_
[
'> % o w 2
E
k
$ ° � \
CO
a) --0q
^
2 s > •C 3 ƒ
y > CO m
=
k
E \ \ /
ƒ
a-
a-
CO
0)4-- \Ui
L
_
CO
\ \ / 0 $
E
ƒ a A
= c : $ \
2
0 2
%'k $ R
gdG/
E
= >
\m
CO
q
COO
\\=\§_
/
k
o = _
U) E
@
D
I
_
(\k\%
%
%
U
\
°°
k
§I/£2
/
0 \ \ 2
0
\\$_
70" a)o
m o= E e
_
) 3 -
k
\0L)m
E
f J /
ƒ
±
\/
k\V)—�_
ECo
0
J
r ¥
2 t_ 2 � E
f_ e
> ° I-- t
= =
m E I m o
k\ U
R 2 E£ w
0 0 0
= mƒ
7 20
2R�
\ ƒ _ / £
m ° U)
% =
> m
± _ % m
°ƒƒ/\
�
� > E \
/da) -0_C
n 5 G ® ¥
\ a) -2 # (
5 2 L) s% E
/ \
k
7 \ $ E
oo\00CDCD oo00 \�
oo\\000\\000
////\\\/\8/\
®=&�\�G^ o4
///— oo \--o\��
N\\ /7\\%/\
7*2%%
h0 CD MM/\0\\
CD CD CD\ �
CO
7 �
/
CO
/
2
\
CO
CO
/
/
7 CO
CO
/
CO
®�9I$�%
N
I,-
N \ / \
N Co/
q =
o0-----�1
--==oo==—o--I
o\�0000000\o
\ » ° » R 0- k > §
_ 0 c = —
ƒ<�22J//k3
mmmigm
M CO I n CO
6 6 6 6
s
Pak u Lands Restoration Site Phase 3 sS PCS Phosphate Company, Inc.
Fourth Annual Report May 2018

a
LD
c
m
0.
U)
mo
2
a
a)
a)
a)
0
a U) I--
C 2 O
N
M V
V00
LO O O
a,
O M
O 00 O� W
LO M O
O r
M N V
O LO
a) U
(6 M
LO
— 0 0
0 M O
M W O O C6
M-
M M
M O O O
V
p
c0 M
6 O O O LO
6 W O
O c0 N� O
O
N O
a o >
V M
M
M M1-
O co O r
W
N O M C) (0
M O (6 c0
00 O (0 O DM
OJ
H
N C6
r-
t` M r --O
M r-
CO r-- M co
W (6
W P- O O O
O 6) N!�)
N (6
r-,
7
to
0
a)
2 >
t`
M r-- O p
p 0 r-
r- r.- p W N
LO M M
'It '�T (6 �
LO O M O
O r--
M
O Q
a
W V
I-
M c0 I-
c0 C0
I- M M LO
I- LO I-
c0 (6 M M (0
(0 6) V LO
M Co
r'
M
Lp
O
6)V
M M
0') LO 00 V O
't r- O N (6 M W O W
M N
(My Cl) M M
6)
O N
O
M M
Lf)
Co
O co
c0 c0
c0 LO
C0 r
C CO
O
E
N
U) P
U)
V 6)
N
N M� O
c
M (0 M N co
co c0
N LO co O
V O M
c0
Cl) Q0
LO
C:)
N Z)
M
LL
>
OF
M c0
LO
O N
O M O
c0
O
6) M
f� 0 C6 t`
O O
t` O
r-
CO CO
M d1 M
M
N r --
N
d'
N 6)
Q
N
O Cl)
I- I-
r
I- V
LO r
M
�
M
Cd N
M@
N
co 0
It p CY
M
N
O
V
LO
N O M N
W
6) O O (0
M 4 r-
t`
M V N
M V co
N �
a)
(`')
N
E
N
U)
O
O
O -t N O
N O M
O qt O N
O
LO O
N O O
O O O O
N M
O r"
_
N
U
U)
M
m
O (o N
M I N
LO O O- V
M N
It p 6)
V
V
LO
N
W
M
M co r-
r-
N
N Lo
C')¢
m
0 '�
t` 6)
f�
N
MO 6) 6) co N
LO P. -N
f� LO O N ()
(6
r� LO
N O
'It
O O
U
LO
(0
N O N
Itd1
N
p O co
M W
(.0 N
r. -N
Cl) p O N
O 1- N
N L()
N
O
cl-
O
H
� U
Q) N
O N
Lia
i) iq
E
E
M
C
n
U)
T)
Y
a
=
O
O
O
N
a)
O
Y
CLD
N
O
>
L
O
U
O
O
_
O
O O
@
Y U)O
m
U) O E
a)
0
Q
t
Y
t L
_m
Q N Q
p Y Y
L Y
i Y
Q O U)
h
` O
L
O U m
O Q Q�
O p O
O- U O
.0 O T O- m
O_ E O
m
I-)+
O
@
O NQ
NU
Y t
-Z6
>
U)¢
S
j 3
O (6 !=
C�
cn
no cn _3
O U)
U a m¢
U) a o
(n w
0 m
Q3
-0
0 m
.�
E
W c
m
m
-0 m
N m
s;
0
a)
o
0
.
m W
z
a)
m
0 U cmi
0 yU
m O
;�
F
m
M
N
Cl) iyO
=S m
•m am
io
2'CU
o
0
a) °°m
o
a.mm
m
om
0ai
m
°
m �
t
`°
ama
am
0.
.�
C1,
m Q
m@
,m
E c
a a
ce
r'o
m
m
o
c m�
m
m .g
m 0
C/)
-i
c0 U
U
U U LL g
z Z Z
a a 0 0 0
0 0 0
cf 0 I—
ti U U Q zz
Z (Z
P and U Lands Restoration Site Phase 3 T-34 PCS Phosphate Company, Inc.
Fourth Annual Report May 2018

Pak u Lands Restoration Site Phase 3 Ga PCS Phosphate Company, Inc.
Fourth Annual Report May 2018
\%
r/
r C.0
/=
/ > @
@ \
,
/
o
#"S\/r
D—
r
o IN
X22
�
~
} /
o
=
w=m r=
z = _ #
o
= r
o��
w = _
_ '
o
k 2
w
w# r N
r oo
N=
c,_
ƒ\
w
r= o m=
r
w==
w
ƒ
r
n
a n o
# m � �
n
_
o>
® 7 =
\
~
/-
q
/
6
E
]"
w: ::1
r
o o m
a o
o= r/
m
04
\
\
\
04
}
/
/#\
J w
g
w y g/
a
o
\§
CO
0
#
z= r--
m
00
r
r w
c�'
0
2
CO
§ 3
/
/
R 3
0
0 0 0 0
0 0
0 0 0
0 0\
m
@ �
s
—
\ /
_
7
2& \@
a Q k
7/
E
IN
7 R
\
a
«
-
76
�
g
w 7 4 R
p a
2$ 3&
\
LO 2
U)
m
/
_
(/
\§
7 6
;
/ +
_.
°
(
i
E
5
®
@
5 \
»
/ 2
E
7
a
j
C$
§
7 2
R
]
\
\
§
2 2 L
k§§\
7
I
E
2
0 a±\
3
E
e%
/
3 § j
ƒ \
\ \
%
@
\
\
a
/
»
a
E
\
\
§
.
E
/ g
§
k
( E Q3m
\
, \ \
E
{
t / 2 \
/
/
a
\
/
\ / /
\ \
A
/
Pak u Lands Restoration Site Phase 3 Ga PCS Phosphate Company, Inc.
Fourth Annual Report May 2018

m
C
N
3
0
M
a)
E:
0
m
Cn0
n
d
U
(6
c
o0)I`
N N
7 7 0 0— N� O N� (0 w M 0 0 7
''
O
L)C
N O L O(6 M O OM N O N O
O)
O
O
a o >
a M
@
o o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O
Cl)
O
o
Z0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0�
o
o
w
c
U >O
O r- 0 0 O N O 0 0 0 0
O
O
O
N
IL Q
M O� O M O O M 0 0 0 0 0
O
O
Cl
W M O LO 00 O CO O"t W O (n
CO
GAO O
— N
CO
n
n r
(M
N rh
N a
E
a�
rn
N
O O O O LO 0 0 0 0 M 0 0 0 0 0 CD
D
O O
M
N M
OC
N Z)
M
LL
W OM O't 00 O M O (M O U')
I\
�- N
O
CD n
N
Q
N C`7
N M
MM
LON A V N 0 0 0 M LO C:)
M N LO
't
O
O O
N
T a
O
F
r
N CO
�
N le
U7
E N
N
O N
C
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0— 0 0 0 O O O
�- N
0
0 0
0
N
r -
m
LO N A V N 0 0 0 0 (1') OIt
M N (n
11,
G
O O
N
T M
Q
N CO
V
N�
@ �O
O O
I� N N O 00 O M (O M O (t7
M CO
�- N
N
��
0) N
V V (1')
M @
N
E 'y
N
N to
w to
w
CO (0
CO GO
y
N p
0 .i.
-O p
P .i.
m
y
s Cl)
o :°
E
c)
~ 0
(6
O
Q)
~
0
E
7 N
U
0
E
O
U
Y O C -2L
O Y rn y U d
Q a) CL
O
CL
O
L
O
CL
U
C
N
L L N Y O c M
0 >
i m `o Q `O o= °> n�
m
0 Q Q 0 a
3
3 a O� E 5 U E o U
O @ @ -O O O
U
s`
c
c
>M U O 0 >_ a
0
Y
C > CO U) J 0 U) > d m (n U) d'
I <1
Z)
(6
U
Q)y
M
z N a
'GOi
U
N
O
E
d Q)O N N �
O U
N
d
y i z U :� y y O O> O
N
a
� h O
N CL
OJ
C
w
L y N y N
h m -
o
�_ Q) a�- o
m
U)
J CO 0 (L Z Z Z a CY d d d I- I_ ti U a
CO 0
O
N
3
E
0
m
N
N
L
H
c
N
m
Q
E
N
w
r
C
0
0_
N
L
c
C
_O
N
C
N >
N N
a
N C
a
ca E
a @
O C
E
a O
C U
@ N
N
6
C' U
N
O N
C C
O y0
O
w �
c
N N O
a
O
x
0 o �
n d
w L @
L
U a
N @ @
N a N
o 0 m
a (6 @
N N
CL E
a E w
@
C N �
N O
to Y
L @
N -O
N @
N O N U
� a C @
� O U
@ N + w
aa a) @
a) a) 3
m O m m
@ N U N >
w m d
� @ a O
EU
> C m
c
� �n F-
P
P and U Lands Restoration Site Phase 3 T-36 PCS Phosphate Company, Inc.
Fourth Annual Report May 2018

__,,.
AURORA`Z.
r•
-.�
SOUTH
CORRIDOR
_ r
J P LANDS
SOUTH CREEK
CORRIDOR _
9 P
_ --_ - — — - - PHASE 1
s — - PHASE 2 P L NDSB_- ��'•�� "'�~
PHASE ti
BTao�I SYT HASS3
T--- co
~PHA £ 4
i U LA DS � -
PHASE 1 P LANDS - PARKER FARM \
-J 11
SECTIONS A ,
- LAT:: 76'46' 19.2 •' _
- , LONG: 76'46'19.20"
RO DMAN�' •• 1
CONTROL C
SITE
CASEY TRACT-�-
P LANDS q s I r
HASE 4 U LANDS _ W r. I.wa c . Y - - ~•
LANDS
LEGEND
P and U LANDS BOUNDARY
P and U LANDS PHASE 3
0 6,000 12,000
SOUTH CREEK CORRIDOR AND
PARKER FARM BOUNDARY
SCALE IN FEET
NORTH CAROLINA VICINITY MAP
P AND U LANDS PHASE 3 AND TWO CONTROL SITES
SITE LOCATION PCS PHOSPHATE COMPANY, INC.
P and U LANDS
SOURCE: SCALE: AS SHOWN APPROVED BY: DRAWN BY: TLJ
PORTIONS OF THE BOUNDARY PROVIDED BY: ROBERT M. CHILES, DS_V
NEW BERN, NORTH CAROLINA, JOB #2009096, DATED: 11/19/2009 DATE: 02/15/18 FILE: 2.PLANIC_PH3_
17 FI_V
AND 02/02/2010 AND BEAUFORT COUNTY GIS DATA WEBSITE
WWW.CO.BEAUFORT.NC.US, BEAUFORT COUNTY PARCEL DATA SHAPEFILES,
NAD 1963 FEET. °n CP#1745.59.32.3
4709 COLLEGE ACRES DRIVE
USGS TOPOGRAPHIC MAP IMAGES, NC STATEPLANE, d Z R SUITE 2
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION WILMINGTON, NORTH CAROLINA 28403
INCOPORATED TEL [phone]
NA083, FEET, 1:24000—SCALE, WEBSITE: WWW.N000T.ORG ENVIRON ENTARCONSULTANTS FAX [phone] FIGURE 1

PHASE 3 - AREAS PLANTED: PHASE Z
— ZONE 1 RIVERINE SWAMP FOREST P LANDS
0 ZONE 1A TAR—PAMLICO RIPARIAN BUFFER
0 ZONE 2 HEADWATER FOREST
— ZONE 2A TAR—PAMLICO RIPARIAN BUFFER PLPS 8
0 SMALL ROAD
PHASE 2 ZONE 3 NON—RIVERINE SWAMP FOREST PLPS 14
� 10
0 ZONE 4 POND PINE POCOSIN FOREST 113 O 2 111 •
BUFFER PLOT B
BUFFER PLOT A 7 u 119
0 ZONE 5 HARDWOOD FLAT 1 V,`\� 2' CHANNEL BUFFER PLOT C 120
0 ZONE 6 HARDWOOD FLAT 2 �u - - "'` `*��� 116 BUFFER
'V 125 123 • O PLOT E
{pCHANNEL 124 _ 121
TRANSITION AREA
BAY CITY FARM 127 126 131 BUFFER
CONTROL SITE OF ER PLOT F O PLOT D
O122
O 130 132"1 13 •
D 1208 129 O
¢ PLPS 6
J maw-
197 °
•
,176
BCRW-44 PHASES BAY CITY
NO'
RODMAN 186
CONTROL 198 •
O
-
PHASE 1 n PLPS 5
134•
' t
ITE
201
FORESTED WETLAND
W
° BCRW-29 BCRW-33
RC -1
RC -2
0
W
W
70
` `51•
�50 • PLPS 16
•
RC -30
4 •183
•
•
PHASE 4 o
PHASE 1
SOUTH CREEK
CANAL
PLPS 22
W W
U LANDS
BCRW-17 v1
P LANDS
EXECUTIVE ROAD/
N� W �Y
°
y N
BAY CITY ,59o. 0
0I
150
JAIME ROAD JP 1193°
' So
•®
70 173
•00 155
°
' 160
LPS 1 8
. BAY CI TY NO' 1
PLPS 23 0194
ROAD
�
� ,157
154 169
PLPS 21
O
=
PLPS 24 195
_ 18:N
187
• 171
D
BAY CITY No' 3
197 °
•
,176
! 4%37 x
o Ox
135
°
RODMAN 186
CONTROL 198 •
185.
-
1 141 x
x 139 136
134•
' t
ITE
201
FORESTED WETLAND
W
x 140
-- O O
142
RC -1
RC -2
0
W
W
r0 147
rriC �� O
` `51•
�50 • PLPS 16
•
RC -30
4 •183
•
•
Z
°1aa ft% 146 148 0.149
W 0 -<
U LANDS
181
W W
, 145
•tai 2
152
O
CONTROL WELL
°
y N
BAY CITY ,59o. 0
0I
150
C
Q1
Q _
' So
•®
70 173
•00 155
°
' 160
LPS 1 8
. BAY CI TY NO' 1
� 17
Z 207 Q
ROAD
�
� ,157
154 169
SMALL ROAD
PHASE 1
P LANDS
PHASE 1
LEGEND
•
,176
P & U LANDS BOUNDARY
ROADS
-
®
BERMS AND PARKING AREAS
0
FORESTED WETLAND
0
FORESTED NON -WETLAND
OPENWATER
0
UN -PLANTED 2 FOOT CHANNEL
PLPS 1
UN -PLANTED 25' OFF -SET
166
PHASE 4 NOT PLANTED IN 2014
•
PHASE 3 WELL LOCATION (PUM#)
TREE SAMPLING PLOT
~�
PHOTO STATION NUMBER AND LOCATION
PLPS 6
O
CONTROL WELL
°
BUFFER PLOT LOCATION
rrI_ '• D
x _ _ O
•
,176
°
NOTE:
0 • 177
159%
_°
P & U LANDS BOUNDARY (3,666.92 ACRES)
'o 209 178 •
Q Q
PLPS 1
P AND
166
PLPS 15
(TOTAL ACREAGE INCLUDES 12.52 ACRES OF
208
D •
' U LANDS
1
164
• 167 198
16 •` �•
RIGHT-OF-WAY ALONG STATE ROADS NOT
PLANTED)
174
°
•
•®
70 173
175
161 162
163 •' `
ROAD
—•211 ®• 210
o
° •
`
COUNTY LINE
=
MONITORING LOCATIONS
• 171
D
0170
=
m m
P AND U LANDS PHASE 3 AND TWO CONTROL SITES
172
•
212 2131
W�
`
PCS PHOSPHATE COMPANY, INC.
PLPS 17
Q
PLPS 25 k PLPS 20
SCALE: AS SHOWN
APPROVED BY:
DRAWN BY: TLJ
DATE: 05/10/18
FILE: PLAN DS_PLANT_MON-
WELL PH3 2017
SOURCE:
PORTIONS OF THE BOUNDARY PROVIDED BY: ROBERT M. CHILES,
NEW BERN, NORTH CAROLINA, JOB #2009096, DATED: 11/19/2009
Q
1
1 ,400
1
2,$00
1^
"do
4709 COLLEGE ACRES DRIVE
R
�+
CP#1 745.59.32.3
AND 02/02/2010 AND BEAUFORT COUNTY GIS DATA WEBSITE
WWW.CO. BEAUFORT. NC. US, BEAUFORT COUNTY PARCEL DATA SHAPEFILES,
SCALE IN FEET
SUITE 2
bn WILMINGTON, NORTH CAROLINA 28403
INCORPORATED
FIGURE 2
NAD 1983 FEET.
ENVIRONMENTAL FAX 910%392-9139

Do
Pt
W
D
C)0; n
0
D
CG'tl N
Po �tiio
0
Po PHA 2 ^'
Pt Pt
BAY CITY FARM
CONTROL SITE
BCRW-44
Po
PHASE 4
SOUTH CREEK CANAL Da Po U LANDS
EXECUTIVE ROAD/ 192 To
JAIME ROAD 193 Po
194 191
Pt 196
195 188
RODMAN 187
197
CONTR L
Pt
SMALL ROAD
„3 „2 ,,,
Po 10
1169
\ 117
,is \ _ -�na _ 120
_
125 12 \
124 Da121 PHASE,
127
Wd 126 Po
131
To 122
130 132 133
SF
128 129
BAY CITY No. 4
A
BCRW-29 BCRW-33
37
BCRW-17
SITE 198
PO PO 186 185
142
141 140 136 135 134
INTERMITTENT
201
DARE (ORGANIC)(723.4 ACRES)
139 V
\\�
RC -1
RC -2
To
PHASE 4 184
PONZER (ORGANIC)(815.0 ACRES)
147 51
150
RC -3
U LANDS 183
Da ,a,
r n
zo
144 148 149
46
145 152
2
WASDA (ORGANIC)(103.7 ACRES)
n
Zz ,43
BAY CITY56 NO' 153
Po
a1
0
C 182
180
° -<
160
155
158
Z
Z
m
179
207 0
206 D
N
Da
157 154 169
°
0
177
176
159
P LANDS
0
D
209 178
206
U LANDS
166
165 67 66
(]
Po 70
0
174
173
1 210
75 161
164
162 163 E ?'OAI
7i� _.: LIN
m
170
OUNTY
D 172
Z 212 Po 213
SOURCE:
PORTIONS OF THE BOUNDARY PROVIDED BY: ROBERT M. CHILES,
NEW BERN, NORTH CAROLINA, JOB #2009096, DATED: 11/19/2009
AND 02/02/2010 AND BEAUFORT COUNTY GIS DATA WEBSITE
WWW.CO.BEAUFORT.NC.US, BEAUFORT COUNTY PARCEL DATA SHAPEFILES,
NAD 1983 FEET.
SOIL SURVEY OF BEAUFORT COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA, US DEPARTMENT
OF AGRICULTURE NATURAL RESOURCES CONVERSATION SERVICE,
ISSUED: SEPTEMBER 1995
AERIAL IMAGE FROM: NC ONE MAP GEOGRAPHIC DATA,
2016, NORTH CAROLINA STATE PLANE, NAD1983 FEET,
WEBSITE: WWW.NCMAPONE.COM
P LANDS
BAY CITY No. 3
BAY CITY No.
LEGEND
P AND U LANDS BOUNDARY
• WELL LOCATION (PUM#) AND TREE MONITORING PLOT
(WELLS TO MONITOR LATERAL DRAINAGE EFFECT
MAY NOT HAVE A TREE PLOT. LOCATIONS ARE
APPROXIMATE.)
101 CONTROL WELL
SOILS
SYMBOL SOIL NAME
NOTE:
ONLY HYDRIC SOILS ARE DESIGNATED MINERAL
OR ORGANIC.
SOILS
P AND U LANDS PHASE 3 AND TWO CONTROL SITES
PCS PHOSPHATE COMPANY, INC.
SCALE: AS SHOWN APPROVED BY: DRAWN BY: TLJ
DATE 05/10/18 FILE: P-LANDS-SOILS-PH3-
2017
0 1,200 2,400 CP#1745.59.32.3
� 7 4709 COLLEGE ACRES DRIVE
L SUITE 2
6.RPORATED TEL
WILMINGTON, NORTH CAROLINA 28403
SCALE IN FEET CMRLL CONSULTANTS FAX 910%392 9139 53 FIGURE 3
ENVIRONM
PERENNIAL
INTERMITTENT
Do
DARE (ORGANIC)(723.4 ACRES)
Do
DOROVAN (ORGANIC)(1.2 ACRES)
Po
PONZER (ORGANIC)(815.0 ACRES)
Pt
PORTSMOUTH (MINERAL)(94.8 ACRES)
To
TOMOTLEY (MINERAL)(16.8 ACRES)
Wd
WASDA (ORGANIC)(103.7 ACRES)
NOTE:
ONLY HYDRIC SOILS ARE DESIGNATED MINERAL
OR ORGANIC.
SOILS
P AND U LANDS PHASE 3 AND TWO CONTROL SITES
PCS PHOSPHATE COMPANY, INC.
SCALE: AS SHOWN APPROVED BY: DRAWN BY: TLJ
DATE 05/10/18 FILE: P-LANDS-SOILS-PH3-
2017
0 1,200 2,400 CP#1745.59.32.3
� 7 4709 COLLEGE ACRES DRIVE
L SUITE 2
6.RPORATED TEL
WILMINGTON, NORTH CAROLINA 28403
SCALE IN FEET CMRLL CONSULTANTS FAX 910%392 9139 53 FIGURE 3
ENVIRONM

+ ti
ML � i at L � - lkSSE 2 ■ �
F+ t E 3 2 �1�m
11
I •117 7 ��
# 4 c } i
' ■ ' 125 •123 •118
F • ' 124% 40'121•
i _ } BAY CITY FARM 127 ; %b.0126 13 *►
CONTROL SITE •
122
4 0130 132• 1
-' ■ 0 012 9
aaa tiF- ➢ • -
— BCRW-44 * PHASE 3 Bp CITY
L PHASE n
29 BCRW-33
PHASE 4 v PHASE 1
-T SOU EK CANAL U LANDS P LANDS
XM ' EXECUTIVE ROAD/ ecRw-17❑ v1
•
w LEGEND
JAIME ROAD 193• 191•
•194.1
-
• 196 r - ' PHASE 3 PLANTING AREA
{ 195 188 ■ moo�� N
R O D IVI A N 0, 3 OPEN WATER OR PLUGGED/FILLED DITCH
• •187 -4 138 ,37 BAY CITY
CONTROL 197 r ® ROADS
SITE 141 X36 ® PERIMETER BERM AND PARKING AREAS
198 18• 185 3
201• • - • 140• • _
r C7 142 UN -PLANTED 25' OFF -SET
RC -1 Z 0 1 9 • 151
Rc{2 184 Mc: 150 • WWWWWWW FORESTED WETLAND
RC -3 , H AS E 4 • ■ •144 ' '146• 0149 • ® FORESTED NON—WETLAND
183 • O • 146
U LAND 181 145 • 152
• PHASE 3 WELL LOCATION (PUM#)
•143 No. 2 153
• N BAY CITY 156 • • C CONTROL WELL
C 182 • • 155
c 180 •160 158
0 179 • • Y C Legend
Z � • BA
FZrI 20:0 157 154 1 fi9 N Elevation in Feet
2 O ' Value
•
■ -• cl • 177 •176 159 • Q 2-4
T7 209 178 • 166 Q 4-5
0 208 • 1 7 168
174 164 165 • 6-2
70 •73 • 175• 161 162 163• D 06-9
F ■ 0 210 • • (' LINTY LINE ROA =9-10
• _ • 171 "O = y - 10-11
172 • 0170 m Q 11-12
D • W 12-13
Z •212 213• _ r Q 13-14
14-15
0 ■ 15-16
D 41 016-z1
0 7-121 4e
SOURCE:
PORTIONS OF THE BOUNDARY PROVIDED BY: ROBERT M. CHILES,
NEW BERN, NORTH CAROLINA, JOB #2009096, DATED: 11/19/2009
AND 02/02/2010 AND BEAUFORT COUNTY GIS DATA WEBSITE
WWW.CO.BEAUFORT.NC.US, BEAUFORT COUNTY PARCEL DATA SHAPEFILES,
NAD 1983 FEET.
NORTH CAROLINA FLOODPLAIN MAPPING PROGRAM, BEAUFORT AND
PAMLICO COUNTIES, LIDAR, NC STATEPLANE, NAD 1983, FEET,
WWW.NCFLOODMAPS.COM
MONITORING WELL LOCATIONS ON LIDAR
P AND U LANDS PHASE 3 AND TWO CONTROL SITES
PCS PHOSPHATE COMPANY, INC.
SCALE: AS SHOWN APPROVED BY: DRAWN BY: TLJ
DATE: 05/10/18 FILE: PLAN DS_WELL_LIDAR_
PH3_2017
0 1,400 2,800 4
7 CP#1745.59.32.3
L 4709 COLLEGE ACRES ITE 2
SUITE 2
n WILMINGTON, NORTH CAROLINA 28403
SCALE IN FEET vwoIN NTOAR CONSUL ANTS FAX 910%392-9139 FIGURE 4

16
14
10
r�
4
2
0 4
1
a�
Off',
NOTE: "Range of Normal" and "Aurora Monthly Rainfall Total" plotted on last day of each month.
"Range of Normal" refers to the 30th and 70th percentile thresholds of the probability of onsite rainfall amounts outside of the normal
range (based on historical averages from 1981-2010). WETS Data subject to periodic revision. Data shown are latest available from
http://agacis. rcc-acis.org/?fips=37013
til til ti�
2017 Bay City Daily Rainfall
30% Less Chance
til ti� ti1 ti�
O ; Ory Oti 6;
— Bay City 30 -day Rolling Total
30% More Chance
Figure 5. 2017 Bay City rainfall vs. WETS -Aurora rainfall
til til til til
Off'
• 2017 Aurora Monthly Rainfall Total
2017 Bay City Monthly Rainfall

BENFEWELL ROAD
LEGEND — PHASE 3
HYDROLOGIC
ZONES WETLAND HYDROPERIODS
P & U LANDS BOUNDARY
ROADS 0 e = <6% OF THE GROWING SEASON (36.54 ACRES)
r/////, BERMS AND PARKING AREAS O O = >6 — 12.5 PERCENT OF THE GROWING SEASON (90.06 ACRES) ROYAL ROAD
D FORESTED WETLAND 0 O = >12.5 — 25 PERCENT OF THE GROWING SEASON (183.24 ACRES)
D FORESTED NON—WETLAND O Q = >25 — 75 PERCENT OF THE GROWING SEASON (1,043.42 ACRES) ROYAL ROAD PHASE 2
OPENWATER
P LANDS FF��
UN—PLANTED 25' OFF—SET Po
90
0 PHASE 4 WELL LOCATION
❑o CONTROL WELL NOTE:
HYDROLOGIC ZONES ARE A VISUAL APPROXIMATION OF TOTAL ACRES SMALL ROAD
O WELL MALFUNCTION RESULTED IN AN REPRESENTED BY WELL HYDROPERIOD CATEGORIES BASED ON ONE
ESTIMATION OF EXACT HYDROPERIOD WELL PER 15 ACRES, KNOWLEDGE OF SITE CONDITIONS, AND LIDAR
LENGTH; REPORTED HYDROPERIOD COULD CONTOURS. THE ZONES DO NOT REPRESENT ACTUAL HYDROPERIOD
POSSIBLY BE SHORTER THAN WHAT BOUNDARIES. PHASE 1
ACTUALLY OCCURRED SMALL ROAD P LANDS
PHASE 2 113
PHASE 3 10
� 1140
0111
W 118p 0117 0119
4i 0 115 r 120 0 Qy9
u o sF
U 125 123 Oil PHASE 3
O O 1240 1Nran W cvxn '2'O / PHASE 1
BAY CITY FARM \ 127 0126 1310
CONTROL SITE ^ g22
. 0130 1320 133 0..1
,
O °128 129
�S BCRW44 E PHASE3 ro - BAY CITY No. 4
J PHASE 1
0
n B RW -29 BCRW 33
G
PHASE 4 PHASE 1
SOUTH CREEK CANAL - U LANDS P LANDS
EXECUTIVE ROAD/ W W w BCRW 17
JAIME ROAD 193 191
094 0
0
0196
195 ,88BAY CNo.
o ITY
RODMAN 0 °187'138
CONTROL 197 ° Y5 0
SITE 198
201 180 Fo—
I
141 140 1390 137 134
142RC-1 ZO 1470 ® 1551
184 m Z 150
RC -2 0 °
RC -3 H A S E 4 0, g �� 144ue
0 0� 146° ° ts49 z 0 1,800 3,600
U LAND 1e' - W ^'
o 0743 BAY 56 CITY 11 o. 2 t 0
192 O 0155 SCALE IN FEET
3 0 oeo 0160 t 8 SAY CITY No.
179 0
zo6 200 0 0 =57 169 P AND U LANDS PHASE 3 and TWO CONTROL SIT
° 177 0176 159 LONGEST 2017 HYDROPERIODS AND ESTIMATED HYDROLO(
0 0209 178 O 166
D 208 P LA DS 0 t88 DURING WETS NORMAL AND BELOW NORMAL RAINF,
A ° U LANDS 174 ,g4 165 o7 ° (EXCLUDES JULY IST — JULY 24TH
0 0 0 X175,� AUGUST 24TH — SEPTEMBER 22ND)
v 211 210 173 01 02 ° COUNTY LINE ROAD
Z° 0 171 = _
A 172 ° °170 '� N PCS PHOSPHATE COMPANY, INC
m
0 o w>
0 0/212 2130 ....., ... ... ......., .........".�.. .... .......... ....
SOURCE:
PORTIONS OF THE BOUNDARY PROVIDED BY: ROBERT M. CHILES,
NEW BERN, NORTH CAROLINA, JOB #2009096, DATED: 11/19/2009
AND 02/02/2010 AND BEAUFORT COUNTY GIS DATA WEBSITE
WWW.CO.BEAUFORT.NC.US, BEAUFORT COUNTY PARCEL DATA SHAPEFILES,
NAD 1983 FEET.

LEGEND — PHASE 3
HYDROLOGIC
ZONES WETLAND HYDROPERIODS
P & U LANDS BOUNDARY
ROADS 0 0 = <6% OF THE GROWING SEASON (17.04 ACRES)
BERMS AND PARKING AREAS 0 0 = >6 - 12.5 PERCENT OF THE GROWING SEASON (99.74 ACRE)
D FORESTED WETLAND 0 0 = >12.5 — 25 PERCENT OF THE GROWING SEASON (181.80 ACRES)
D FORESTED NON—WETLAND O 0 = >25 — 75 PERCENT OF THE GROWING SEASON (1,036.76 ACRES)
OPENWATER ® 0 = >75 - 100 PERCENT OF THE GROWING SEASON (17.92 ACRES)
UN -PLANTED 25' OFF -SET
O PHASE 4 WELL LOCATION NOTE:
❑o CONTROL WELL HYDROLOGIC ZONES ARE A VISUAL APPROXIMATION OF TOTAL ACRES
REPRESENTED BY WELL HYDROPERIOD CATEGORIES BASED ON ONE
O WELL PER 15 ACRES, KNOWLEDGE OF SITE CONDITIONS, AND LIDAR
WELL MALFUNCTION RESULTED IN AN CONTOURS. THE ZONES DO NOT REPRESENT ACTUAL HYDROPERIOD
ESTIMATION OF EXACT HYDROPERIOD BOUNDARIES.
LENGTH; REPORTED HYDROPERIOD COULD
POSSIBLY BE SHORTER THAN WHAT
ACTUALLY OCCURRED
PHASE 2
113 SMALL ROAD
PHASE 3 1C
1140
0 111
D 1160 0117 0119
to 0 115 1200
U 125 123 1180
A 0 1240 °' oux¢ 1210 J
BAY CITY FARM 127 0126 1310
CONTROL SITE A 0122
0130 1320
O 0128
h? O
BCRW PHASE3 ro BAY CITY No.
4
O
PHASE 1
O
G RW -29 BCRW 33
ROYAL ROAD
ROYAL ROAD
PHASE 2
P LANDS
9�
PHASE 1
P LANDS
0 1,800 3,600
SCALE IN FEET
PHASE 4
PHASE 1
SOUTH CREEK CANAL
U LANDS
P LANDS
EXECUTIVE ROAD/
W
BCRW 17❑
o
JAIME ROAD
0 194 193 0191
W
W
• 196
195
188
BAY CITY NO. 3
RODMAN 0197
d8713
'
O
W
CONTROL O
: '186
W
O
0
05
O
1340
SITE 188
0
Fl_
141 1�
1�0 137
038
201
142
RC -1
'4©
0 1051
RC -2
19 p
A.r'
0144
150
49
RC -3 ASE 4
0188
0
O
146 1480
0 0
152
U LAND
I
18'
�
0143 14s
CITY No• 2
153
0
0182
158 BA
1560
0� O
o
0
180
r W
•1e 0
BAY CITY
Z
z157 D
0
179
157
O
154 169
206
v 0
0
0209
06
8
7 1770
0176
O
159
-
P LANDS
8
0 0
U LANDS
_
164 165
0' I '0
0
0
173
1740
®175
161 162
0 1
1� -
ROAD
z 0211 210
O
171
0 0
COUNTY LINE
-a
z 9
0172
0
Ono
m m
O 7612 2130
O
/�
w
SOURCE:
PORTIONS OF THE BOUNDARY PROVIDED BY: ROBERT M. CHILES,
NEW BERN, NORTH CAROLINA, JOB #2009096, DATED: 11/19/2009
AND 02/02/2010 AND BEAUFORT COUNTY GIS DATA WEBSITE
WWW.CO.BEAUFORT.NC.US, BEAUFORT COUNTY PARCEL DATA SHAPEFILES,
NAD 1983 FEET.
ROYAL ROAD
ROYAL ROAD
PHASE 2
P LANDS
9�
PHASE 1
P LANDS
0 1,800 3,600
SCALE IN FEET

APPENDIX A
2017 Gum Swamp Run Stream Surveys
P and U Lands Restoration Site Phase 3
1) 2017 Gum Swamp Run Stream Surveys — text and select photos
2) Figure A-1

Gum Swamp Run Flow Survey
20 September 2017
Low to moderate flow was visible and documented for the entire length of the 40 -foot Gum Swamp Run
headwater valley, the entire bowl, and the entire 2 -foot channel of Gum Swamp Run during the survey;
flow speed depended on slope and water depth, amount of vegetation, type of vegetation, and whether or
not flow was constricted at any given location. Overbank flow occurred in the canal at the top of the 40 -
foot valley, the constructed 40 foot valley, and the bowl. Flow paths were identified based on absence or
changes in vegetation, and the absence of algae, seeds, and pollen on the surface of the water. Water in
the 2 -foot channel was at bankfull or out of the channel, although the flow path was difficult to locate in
some segments due to thick vegetation. Water depths varied from 6 to 24 inches in the 40 -foot headwater
valley. Water depth in the bowl ranged from 4 to 12 inches, with some areas of 14 inches. The 2 -foot
channel contained 5 to 15 inches of water. All flow videos from the survey are on the DVD which
accompanies this report and specific ones are mentioned in the text below.
Figure 1 shows the Gum Swamp Run stream construction stationing plan over a 2016 aerial that also
identifies the locations of numbered cross section monitoring poles (e.g., XS10) and eight filled ditches to
show their relationship to the stations/photos/videos referenced in the surveys. Also depicted on Figure 1
are flow features within the Gum Swamp Run system collected by GPS during the annual stream surveys.
NOTE: On 4 April 2016, the XS pole locations were verified in the field with CZR, the project designer
(Jonathan Ricketts), and the project surveyor (Matrix East) and labels were added to all poles. There are
now no poles numbered XS18-XS20 and what was shown as XS20 prior to 2016 is now XS17.
For photo/video camera file number sequence order, the system was walked from upstream to
downstream.
GUM SWAMP RUN
40 -foot Headwater Valle
During the survey, low to moderate flow was consistent throughout the valley. Low flow occurred in areas
with shallower depths and/or thicker vegetation, but moderate flow was more common. Water depths
mostly ranged from 6 to 14 inches with some areas of 24 inches. Due to vegetation clumps and overbank
flow, a discernible flow path was not picked up until near Station 6+00.
Video 1 GSR Video Camera 1 Iocation.MOV shows a flow path through algal mats with moderate flow at
Camera 1; water depth 8 inches. This is the same flow path that was GPS'ed during the November 2014
stream survey.
P and U Lands Restoration Site Phase 3 Appendix A-1 PCS Phosphate Company, Inc.
Fourth Annual Report May 2018

Photos 1 and 2: Upper 40 -foot headwater valley in vicinity of Station 8+00 and Camera 1. Left photo
view upstream and right photo downstream taken from the same location as Video 1. Water depth
was about 8 inches with medium flow.
Photos 3 and 4: Upper 40 -ft headwater valley in the vicinity of Station 12+00. Left photo view upstream
from northwest corner of preserved woods in vicinity of Station 10+00; right photo downstream from same
location. Water depths varied from 10 to 14 inches near the corner with medium flow. The flow path is to
the left in Photo 3 and off to the right in Photo 4.
Photos 5 and 6: Upper 40 -ft headwater valley in the vicinity of PUM 121. Left photo view downstream
taken at the beginning of the flow path that was GPSed during this stream survey (bubbles can be seen
P and U Lands Restoration Site Phase 3 Appendix A-2 PCS Phosphate Company, Inc.
Fourth Annual Report May 2018

flowing downstream); right photo view downstream taken just downstream of Photo 5 with biologist
standing in preferred flow path.
Near the northwest corner of the preserved woods and just south of PUM 121, a new flow path was
observed and GPSed for the first time during this stream survey. The water depth ranged from 6 to 10
inches with medium flow. It was thought the new flow path would connect to a path previously identified in
2014, but remained just south of the older flow path. The flow path ended due to a wall of thick
vegetation. Water continued to flow, but no single path could be found. The path from 2014 just north of
the new path was still evident to Station 20+00.
Photos 7 and 8: Upper 40 -foot headwater valley in vicinity of Station 16+00. Left photo view
downstream standing in the new flow path with the end visible in the distance; right photo view
downstream standing at the end of the new flow path that was covered in thick vegetation.
Photos 9 and 10: 40 -foot headwater valley in vicinity of Station 14+00 and Station18+00. Left photo
view is downstream standing in the 2014 mapped flow path that continues to Station 20+00; right
photo view downstream near Station 18+00 with a section of the stream with bed and bank that can be
seen in the photo at the bottom left corner. Water depth at Station 18+00 was about 7 inches with low
flow.
Video 2 flow 2014 flow path and new flow path near 14+00 shows flow in path observed in 2014 and the
end of the new path with thick vegetation.
P and U Lands Restoration Site Phase 3 Appendix A-3 PCS Phosphate Company, Inc.
Fourth Annual Report May 2018

Photos 11 and 12: 40 -foot headwater valley in vicinity of XS22 and Station 24+00. Left photo view is
downstream near XS22; right photo view downstream near Station 24+00.
The previously identified flow paths in 2014 and 2015 from XS22 to Station 28+00 were difficult to
locate due to thick vegetation, as shown in Photos 11 and 12. Low flow was observed throughout the
section with water depths ranging from 5 to 7 inches.
Video 3 near 26+00 flow but no single flow path.MOV shows low flow across the 40 -foot valley, but no
single flow path. Seeds and pollen covered the surface.
Near Station 30+00, a evident flow path was GPSed that connected to a 2014 path upstream. Flow was
medium to low, depending on the amount of vegetation, slope, depth, and width of channel. Water depth
ranged from 5 to 10 inches. During this stream survey, a distinct, continuous flow path was observed from
Station 30+00 in the 40 -foot valley to near station 45+03 in the bowl. The width of the flow path ranged
from 1 to 2 feet wide with thick vegetation on either side. The path was identified by the lack of rooted
vegetation in the channel.
.4-
Photos
4-
Photos 13 and 14: 40 -foot headwater valley in vicinity of XS17 and Station 34+00. Left photo view is
downstream near XS17 with biologist in channel with visible bed and bank; right photo view
downstream near Station 34+00 showing the flow path with vegetation on either side that had medium
flow and 8 inches of water.
Video 4 just downstream of XS1 T MOV shows the beginning of a flow path that was GPSed during this
stream survey with medium flow in about 6 inches of water. The channel is narrow and cuts through thick
vegetation (note: video has some audio issues and narrator incorrectly says XS17 is downstream, but it is
actually upstream of video).
P and U Lands Restoration Site Phase 3 Appendix A-4 PCS Phosphate Company, Inc.
Fourth Annual Report May 2018

The Bowl (deeply rutted area of no construction between the 2 -foot Gum Swamp Run constructed
channel and 40 -foot constructed headwater valley)
Low to moderate flow was continuous across the entire bowl with water depths consistently 4 to 12 inches
with 14 -inch depths in a few rutted areas (ruts run N to S across the bowl). In previous times of low water,
pin flags were used to mark constriction points, but the flags were difficult to find during this stream
survey. Two distinct flow paths were mapped in previous stream surveys between Stations 40+00 and
44+00. During this stream survey, the water seemed to prefer a middle path between the two paths and
was GPSed.
' Y f
r
V� �Y
a.
F
&
f"As". .5�` .kms ', 4•
Photos 15 and 16: The bowl in the vicinity of Buffer Plot C. Left photo view is downstream standing in
the upstream section of the 2015 mapped flow path; right photo view downstream standing in newly
GPSed flow path in between the two paths that were observed in previous years.
Photos 17 and 18: The bowl in the vicinity of Station 44+00 and XS13. Left photo view is downstream
standing in the flow path that was mapped in 2016 near Station 44+00; right photo view is downstream
looking at XS13 pole where vegetation has obscured the flow path that was visible in previous years.
2 -foot Channel
Water was present within the entire length of the 2 -foot channel with depths ranging for 5 to 15 inches.
Occasionally moderate flow was observed, but low flow was more common due to vegetation growing in
the channel. Herbaceous vegetation (e.g., wool grass Scirpus cyperinus, fragant flatsedge Cyperus
odoratus, and Solidago sp.) obscured the visibility of the channel and any features that have formed,
especially downstream of XS5, and herbaceous vegetation (Polygonum sp. and Bacopa sp.) was rooted
in the channel itself in places, which was first noted in 2016 (predominantly downstream of XS5 as well).
Of the live stake species planted along the channel edge, button bush (Cephalanthus occidentalis) and
P and U Lands Restoration Site Phase 3 Appendix A-5 PCS Phosphate Company, Inc.
Fourth Annual Report May 2018
W � ti
Photos 15 and 16: The bowl in the vicinity of Buffer Plot C. Left photo view is downstream standing in
the upstream section of the 2015 mapped flow path; right photo view downstream standing in newly
GPSed flow path in between the two paths that were observed in previous years.
Photos 17 and 18: The bowl in the vicinity of Station 44+00 and XS13. Left photo view is downstream
standing in the flow path that was mapped in 2016 near Station 44+00; right photo view is downstream
looking at XS13 pole where vegetation has obscured the flow path that was visible in previous years.
2 -foot Channel
Water was present within the entire length of the 2 -foot channel with depths ranging for 5 to 15 inches.
Occasionally moderate flow was observed, but low flow was more common due to vegetation growing in
the channel. Herbaceous vegetation (e.g., wool grass Scirpus cyperinus, fragant flatsedge Cyperus
odoratus, and Solidago sp.) obscured the visibility of the channel and any features that have formed,
especially downstream of XS5, and herbaceous vegetation (Polygonum sp. and Bacopa sp.) was rooted
in the channel itself in places, which was first noted in 2016 (predominantly downstream of XS5 as well).
Of the live stake species planted along the channel edge, button bush (Cephalanthus occidentalis) and
P and U Lands Restoration Site Phase 3 Appendix A-5 PCS Phosphate Company, Inc.
Fourth Annual Report May 2018

willow (Salix sp.) are the only species which appear to have thrived; they also have increased the shade
cover across the channel mostly downstream of XS5. A small section of high flow was noted where the 2 -
foot channel flows into the Newberry riffle.
Photos 19 and 20: Constructed 2 -foot channel. Left photo view downstream in the vicinity of XS12 where
vegetation was absent in the channel; right photo view downstream with XS7 pole shown to the left
(behind the bay tree) and channel covered in vegetation in the middle of the photo.
Photo 21 and 22: Constructed 2 -foot channel. Left photo view downstream in the vicinity of XS5 with thick
vegetation but channel was still visible, shown in the middlle of the photo; right photo view is downstream
near XS1 with the just upstream.
P and U Lands Restoration Site Phase 3 Appendix A-6 PCS Phosphate Company, Inc.
Fourth Annual Report May 2018

Photo 23 and 24: Constructed 2 -foot channel. Left photo view to the south standing in the intervalley
connector (IVC); right photo view to the north standing in the IVC that had no water. No water was
present in the IVC during this stream survey.
Video 5 end of 2ft channel.MOV shows high flow in 2 -foot channel into the Newberry riffle and upstream.
HEADWATER VALLEY SOUTH OF GUM SWAMP RUN
The upper section of the headwater valley from the PUM 126 flow station to the downstream end of the
channel that was dug across the overfilled interior ditch by CZR in 2016 had no flow. Water depths in this
section varied from saturation at the soil surface to 4 inches of standing water. Just outside of the 2016
channel dug across the ditch fill, a 20 -foot long stretch through the valley had low flow with 4 to 6 inches
of water, but no discernible flow path. Another small section of flow with 4 to 6 inches of water was
observed by the PUM 127 flow station.
Photos 25 and 26: Upper headwater valley south of Gum Swamp Run. Left photo view downstream with
PUM 126 flow station pole in middle of photo; right photo view downstream with biologist standing in the
middle of the 1 -foot wide channel dug across Ditch 1.
Video 6 downstream end of dug out channel.MOV shows 4 to 6 inches of water low flow just outside of
the downstream point of the dug out channel.
P and U Lands Restoration Site Phase 3 Appendix A-7 PCS Phosphate Company, Inc.
Fourth Annual Report May 2018

Photos 27 and 28: Headwater valley south of Gum Swamp Run. Left photo view downstream in the
vicinity of Ditch 1 at the end of a 20 -foot long section of flow through the valley; right photo view
downstream at the PUM 127 flow station showing a small flow path through vegetation.
P and U Lands Restoration Site Phase 3 Appendix A-8 PCS Phosphate Company, Inc.
Fourth Annual Report May 2018

93
D 71+41.78
XS1 XS3
XS2
116
a7 00
600
115 s
C) 00
U1
±64+03
O BUFFER PLOT A
O
N
127
SAN ®S
PHASE 2 SMALL ROAD
PHASE 3
[2] 3 � a''iLi� •�
0
LEGEND
0 0 '°tip
s�
PARKER FARM
SPILLWAY \
I8+ BUFFER PLOT B
xs8 xslo SEE DETAIL "A"
XS4 XS7 XS11 BUFFER PLOT C
XS5AXS6 XS12 XS15
XS9 /XS�1 6
0o x0
60+00 50+00 x0 �, 46+ —.O b 0+00_
�p 00 00 38i 00 rn
125 A$. XS14
± _ 23 XS17 BUFFER PLOT E \
54+32± + XS 13 6+8 + lzo
32+00"� XS21
/ BUFFER PLOT F 30+00 29+00 121
Qx
att R • 12+00
P XS22 XS23 a�
126 +53± \` 18+05± <
er, o o 120+00 n oo +70±
si= 122
••'�i
/BUFFER PLOT D
eA
SOURCE:
PORTIONS OF THE BOUNDARY PROVIDED BY: ROBERT M. CHILES,
NEW BERN, NORTH CAROLINA, JOB #2009096, DATED: 11/19/2009
AND 02/02/2010 AND BEAUFORT COUNTY GIS DATA WEBSITE
WWW.CO.BEAUFORT.NC.US, BEAUFORT COUNTY PARCEL DATA SHAPEFILES,
NAD 1983 FEET.
MINOR STREAM HISTORICAL TRIBUTARY LOCATION PROVIDED BY: MATRIX
EAST, LLC, 906 NORTH QUEEN STREET, SUITE A, KINSTON, NC 28501,
[phone]
AS BUILT LIDAR FOR DIGITIZING RESTORED HEADWATER VALLEY
PROVIDED BY:
JONATHAN RICKETTS ENGINEERING,
3450 NORTHLAKE BLVD., PALM BEACH
GARDENS, FLORIDA, PHONE 561_630_6700
AERIAL IMAGE FROM: NC ONE MAP GEOGRAPHIC DATA,
2016, NORTH CAROLINA STATE PLANE, NAD1983 FEET,
WEBSITE: WWW.NCMAPONE.COM
PHASE
BAY CITY 1 NO.
4
t
`' - - -
.y.
- - - ,
0 100 200
SCALE IN FEET
XS25
P AND U LANDS
DESIGN CENTERLINE OF GUM SWAMP RUN
40—FOOT VALLEY FLOW PATH (11-20-14)
MONTHLY FLOW OBSERVATION LOCATION
MONITORING WELL CLOSEST TO MONTHLY
FLOW OBSERVATION
BUFFER PLOT LOCATIONS
FLOW VIDEO CAMERA LOCATIONS
CROSS SECTION NUMBER AND LOCATION
RESTORED HEADWATER VALLEY WITH NO
VALLEY CONSTRUCTION (DIGITIZED FROM
AS BUILT LIDAR)
DITCH NUMBER
e'00 4 100 FLOW PATH OBSERVED/FEATURE FORMED
SORTING/SCOUR
3+60±
- I a BED/BANK
60
0 500 1,000
SCALE IN FEET
P AND U LANDS MITIGATION SITE — PHASE 3
GUM SWAMP RUN
PCS PHOSPHATE COMPANY, INC.
SCALE: AS SHOWN APPROVED BY: DRAWN BY: TLJ
DATE: 04/17/18 FILE: P_LANDS_GUMRUN_PH
2017 APPX FIG1
CP# 1745.59.32.3
�7 4709 COLLEGE ACRES DRIVE
L SUITE 2
WILMINGTON, NORTH CAROLINA 28403 APPENDIX A
ENVIMNMCMALR PCONSULTAM FAX 910%392 9139 FIGURE 1

APPENDIX B
2017 Third Annual Stem Counts at Individual Plots at
P and U Lands Restoration Site Phase 3

Appendix B. Individual tree/shrub plot counts from P and U Lands Phase 3 first (2014) and fourth (2017) annual fall monitoring. Numbers in each column indicate stems unquestionably alive at sampling. Plot size is 0.3 acre.
Zone 2
PUM112
Zone 1
PUM115
PUM116
PUM191
PUM196
Total
1 st
1 st
4th
1 st
4th
1 st
4th
1 st
4th
1 st
4th
Common name
Scientific name
Unknown
?
4
8
5
1
2
1
1
Serviceberry
Amelanchier canadensis
18
20
21
21
9
4
10
5
4
Red chokeberry
Aronia arbutifolia
9
4
7
2
6
Paw paw
Asima triloba
4
1
1
2
River birch
Betula nigra
4
14
2
3
12
2
3
American beautyberry
Callicarpa americana
1
13
8
10
5
Ironwood
Carpinus caroliniana
1
1
1
2
2
2
1
Water hickory
Carya aquatica
1
2
Sugarberry
Celtis laevigata
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
Buttonbush*
Cephalanthus occidentalis
1
1
Atlantic white cedar
Chamaecyparis thyoides
2
10
10
37
31
23
Sweet pepperbush
Clethra alnifolia
7
22
22
13
1
16
1
1
2
1
Silky dogwood
Cornus amomum
1
1
1
Swamp dogwood
Cornus foemina
3
2
3
Titi
Cyrilla racemiflora
2
2
2
2
Persimmon
Diospora virginiana
5
6
3
3
6
4
5
4
13
Strawberry bush
Euonymous americana
1
7
6
1
4
1
6
3
3
Green ash
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
17
13
34
33
5
4
27
26
83
76
Deciduous holly
L decidua
4
2
5
5
10
10
Inkberry
L glabra
1
1
Winterberry
Ilex verticillata
2
Virginia sweetspire
Itea virginica
3
19
16
13
12
1
7
12
6
1
Swamp doghobble
Leucothoe (Eubotrys) racemosa
4
15
18
3
3
7
7
22
21
9
Spicebush
Lindera benzoin
12
26
25
1
Fetterbush
Lyonia lucida
1
2
Sweetbay
Magnolia virginiana
3
3
2
1
1
5
4
Mulberry
Morus rubra
1
1
64
Unknown gum/tupelo
Nyssa spp.
92
76
1
97
3
78
67
112
4
115
Water tupelo
N. aquatica
20
19
17
17
11
12
15
13
63
61
Swamp tupelo
Nyssa biflora
28
22
14
9
11
1
1
1
54
33
Red bay
Persea borbonia
Pond pine
Pinus serotina
Sycamore
Platanus occidentalis
9
7
9
7
Oak
Quercus spp.
White oak
Q. alba
Laurel oak
Q. laurifolia
1
1
Overcup oak
Q. lyrata
2
3
2
1
10
11
17
15
31
30
Swamp chestnut oak
Q. michauxii
48
44
19
21
27
20
11
11
105
96
Water oak
Q. nigra
Cherrybark oak
Q. pagoda
1
20
21
Willow oak
Quercus phellos
1
21
22
Dwarf azalea
Rhododendron atlanticum
Swamp azalea
Rhododendron viscosum
Swamp rose
Rosa palustris
Pond cypress
Taxodium ascendens
4
4
4
4
Bald cypress
Taxodium distichum
6
6
13
14
7
8
12
12
38
40
American elm
Ulmus americana
1
1
6
5
5
5
12
11
High bush blueberry
Vaccinium corymbosum
2
1
2
1
Possumhaw
Viburnum nudum
1
2
1
1
2
3
Dusty zenobia
Zenobia pulverulenta
ALIVE STEMS
124
110
102
96
102
81
115
108
443
395
TOTAL STEMS
134
137
123
125
103
105
126
127
486
494
Zone 2
PUM112
PUM114
PUM117
PUM118
PUM127
PUM193
PUM194
1 st
4th
1 st
4th
1 st
4th
1 st
4th
1 st
4th
1 st
4th
1 st
4th
4
8
5
2
1
2
18
20
21
21
9
4
10
5
4
4
14
9
4
7
2
6
4
1
1
2
4
14
14
12
12
1
13
8
10
5
1
1
1
2
2
2
1
1
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
2
10
10
37
31
23
7
30
7
22
22
13
14
16
16
2
2
1
1
3
2
3
2
1
5
6
3
3
6
4
5
4
13
11
2
1
7
6
1
4
1
6
3
3
2
6
4
13
10
14
11
6
3
13
9
4
2
5
5
10
10
1
1
2
7
3
19
16
13
12
14
7
12
6
19
14
7
4
15
18
3
3
7
7
22
21
9
10
12
12
26
25
1
1
1
2
1
1
1
1
64
61
109
92
76
40
97
49
78
67
112
95
115
103
68
74
118
119
129
129
119
117
98
101
112
113
120
120
P and U Lands Phase 3 Forth Annual Report B-1

Appendix B. (continued)
Zone 2A
PUM121
Zone 2
PUM123
PUM125
PUM195
PUM197
PUM198
Total
Common name
Scientific name
1 st
4th
1 st
4th
1 st
4th
1 st
4th
Unknown
?
1
4
5
9
1
1
29
2
Serviceberry
Amelanchier canadensis
3
5
5
6
3
1
Red chokeberry
Aronia arbutifolia
18
7
1
9
9
1
Paw paw
Asima triloba
1
1
1
3
3
River birch
Betula nigra
23
21
14
9
18
12
135
112
American beautyberry
Callicarpa americana
1
1
5
3
3
Ironwood
Carpinus caroliniana
3
3
1
1
6
11
Water hickory
Carya aquatica
5
3
6
110
6
2
39
37
Sugarberry
Celtis laevigata
2
1
2
2
2
6
26
14
Buttonbush*
Cephalanthus occidentalis
9
1
2
81
6
5
Atlantic white cedar
Chamaecyparis thyoides
14
39
33
141
122
Sweet pepperbush
Clethra alnifolia
7
1
1
1
1
5
4
Silky dogwood
Cornus amomum
125
118
1
1
122
5
4
3
Swamp dogwood
Cornus foemina
5
1
Titi
Cyn1la racemiflora
1
2
Persimmon
Diospora virginiana
1
62
14
28
Strawberry bush
Euonymous americana
7
36
29
139
71
Green ash
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
10
13
13
14
31
25
205
159
Deciduous holly
1. decidua
16
23
27
32
33
13
Inkberry
1. glabra
4
8
8
60
57
1
Winterberry
Ilex verticillata
1
1
223
1
102
Virginia sweetspire
Itea virginica
1
1
1
1
1
2
6
7
Swamp doghobble
Leucothoe (Eubotrys) racemosa
1 107 11
132
1 13411
571
1 573
Spicebush
Lindera benzoin
Fetterbush
Lyonia lucida
Sweetbay
Magnolia virginiana
6
4
Mulberry
Morus rubra
Unknown gum/tupelo
Nyssa spp.
1
Water tupelo
N. aquatica
10
8
4
6
2
2
57
51
Swamp tupelo
Nyssa biflora
12
8
10
5
9
4
78
48
Red bay
Persea borbonia
Pond pine
Pinus serotina
Sycamore
Platanus occidentalis
19
18
12
4
19
14
88
65
Oak
Quercus spp.
2
White oak
Q. alba
Laurel oak
Q. laurifolia
1
1
4
Overcup oak
Q. lyrata
1
1
Swamp chestnut oak
Q. michauxii
4
4
14
13
9
11
118
90
Water oak
Q. nigra
Cherrybark oak
Q. pagoda
Willow oak
Quercus phellos
Dwarf azalea
Rhododendron atlanticum
Swamp azalea
Rhododendron viscosum
Swamp rose
Rosa palustris
Pond cypress
Taxodium ascendens
5
5
18
16
22
17
139
134
Bald cypress
Taxodium distichum
2
3
American elm
Ulmus americana
1
High bush blueberry
Vaccinium corymbosum
Possumhaw
Viburnum nudum
3
Dusty zenobia
Zenobia pulverulenta
ALIVE STEMS
89
85
99
70
121
91
958
753
TOTAL STEMS
100
107
102
103
126
127
1,092
1 1,110
Zone 2A
PUM121
PUM122
PUM123
PUM125
Total
1 st
4th
1 st
4th
1 st
4th
1 st
4th
1 st
4th
4
2
5
4
1
9
1
1
2
8
4
3
5
5
6
3
1
9
18
7
1
9
9
1
1
1
1
1
3
3
3
1
3
13
19
3
3
4
4
5
3
1
1
5
3
3
1
3
1
43
24
24
13
19
5
24
23
110
65
18
13
14
10
2
2
2
2
6
3
2
2
20
9
2
2
81
72
4
3
17
14
39
33
141
122
12
7
12
7
102
89
1
35
171
125
118
118
1
122
5
180
5
1
1
1
1
62
14
28
21
13
7
36
29
139
71
2
2
9
11
14
16
23
27
32
33
13
12
7
4
8
8
60
57
1
2
1
2
223
143
102
73
91
56
109
97
525
369
224
224
107
1 108
108
1 107 11
132
1 13411
571
1 573
Zone 3
PUM111
PUM119
PUM120
1 st
4th
1 st
4th
1 st
4th
2
12
1
3
2
4
1
1
1
10
8
5
5
2
3
6
9
18
7
9
9
1
3
22
21
1
3
13
19
5
4
4
4
37
20
1
1
3
1
4
3
5
7
5
17
10
6
4
18
13
14
10
16
8
18
10
6
3
4
3
20
9
1
2
16
16
1
28
28
3
1
4
102
89
72
35
171
125
118
118
121
122
179
180
P and U Lands Phase 3 Forth Annual Report B-2

Appendix B. (continued)
P and U Lands Phase 3 Forth Annual Report B-3
Zone 3
PUM124
PUM126
PUM128
PUM129
PUM130
PUM131
PUM132
PUM133
PUM135
PUM136
PUM137
PUM138
PUM139
Common name
Scientific name
1 st
4th
1 st
4th
1 st
4th
1 st
4th
1 st
4th
1 st
4th
1 st
4th
1 st
4th
1 st
4th
1 st
4th
1 st
4th
1 st
4th
1 st
4th
Unknown
?
2
9
9
9
3
2
2
6
39
2
15
8
Serviceberry
Amelanchier canadensis
Red chokeberry
Aronia arbutifolia
Paw paw
Asima triloba
River birch
Betula nigra
11
10
American beautyberry
Callicarpa americana
Ironwood
Carpinus caroliniana
1
1
Water hickory
Carya aquatica
Sugarberry
Celtis laevigata
1
1
Buttonbush*
Cephalanthus occidentalis
3
3
2
2
2
2
2
Atlantic white cedar
Chamaecyparis thyoides
21
20
17
15
12
10
15
13
20
9
11
10
14
11
6
6
6
6
3
2
9
6
2
Sweet pepperbush
Clethra alnifolia
1
9
4
9
6
5
3
4
1
1
2
5
4
2
1
5
4
Silky dogwood
Cornus amomum
Swamp dogwood
Cornus foemina
4
1
1
1
2
2
1
1
3
Titi
Cyrilla racemiflora
6
5
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
31
29
2
2
1
1
Persimmon
Diospora virginiana
Strawberry bush
Euonymous americana
Green ash
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
1
1
1
1
1
1
6
4
Deciduous holly
1. decidua
Inkberry
1. glabra
1
Winterberry
Ilex verticillata
1
Virginia sweetspire
Itea virginica
2
2
1
2
1
1
1
1
Swamp doghobble
Leucothoe (Eubotrys) racemosa
Spicebush
Lindera benzoin
Fetterbush
Lyonia lucida
Sweetbay
Magnolia virginiana
5
5
2
2
5
4
3
2
1
16
12
8
7
1
1
1
1
1
3
3
Mulberry
Morus rubra
Unknown gum/tupelo
Nyssa spp.
3
1
2
2
3
5
1
5
1
2
Water tupelo
N. aquatica
12
12
2
2
22
23
8
11
4
4
9
7
14
7
5
11
25
15
12
4
10
11
22
15
21
16
Swamp tupelo
Nyssa biflora
16
12
1
1
12
9
6
3
20
12
8
4
12
4
2
2
29
15
16
10
12
4
18
12
6
7
Red bay
Persea borbonia
2
1
1
2
2
1
3
1
Pond pine
Pinus serotina
Sycamore
Platanus occidentalis
Oak
Quercus spp.
4
9
2
10
5
7
20
7
1
6
3
16
White oak
Q. alba
Laurel oak
Q. laurifolia
16
7
2
10
9
11
11
10
15
6
1
14
2
8
6
7
1
6
4
7
4
2
1
6
4
Overcup oak
Q. lyrata
6
6
5
3
26
22
31
26
15
13
21
12
13
9
17
14
7
4
4
9
6
8
8
Swamp chestnut oak
Q. michauxii
8
6
12
11
19
15
36
27
37
35
31
10
17
10
14
6
7
24
2
33
8
22
12
20
5
Water oak
Q. nigra
Cherrybark oak
Q. pagoda
1
1
Willow oak
Quercus phellos
5
5
8
7
24
19
37
22
15
8
5
2
10
6
11
8
7
4
1
1
3
3
14
14
7
5
Dwarf azalea
Rhododendron atlanticum
Swamp azalea
Rhododendron viscosum
Swamp rose
Rosa palustris
Pond cypress
Taxodium ascendens
Bald cypress
Taxodium distichum
5
5
26
25
17
17
27
27
7
7
14
12
18
17
21
23
15
15
25
22
20
19
16
16
11
11
American elm
Ulmus americana
High bush blueberry
Vaccinium corymbosum
1
1
2
1
1
1
1
2
1
Possumhaw
Viburnum nudum
3
1
3
5
3
3
3
3
2
2
3
4
2
2
1
1
1
Dusty zenobia
Zenobia pulverulenta
ALIVE STEMS1
120
88
86
80
186
143
205
157
166
116
133
71
136
77
147
109
123
63
140
54
120
66
136
86
113
60
TOTAL STEMS
127
127
92
93
190
189
209
211
174
176
134
134
139
139
156
161
140
140
154
1 544
147
1 147
143
1 144
142
144
P and U Lands Phase 3 Forth Annual Report B-3

Appendix B. (continued)
P and U Lands Phase 3 Forth Annual Report B-4
Zone 3
PUM140
PUM141
PUM142
PUM147
PUM149
PUM150
PUM151
PUM178
PUM179
PUM182
PUM183
PUM184
PUM186
Common name
Scientific name
1 st
4th
1 st
4th
1 st
4th
1 st
4th
1 st
4th
1 st
4th
1 st
4th
1 st
4th
1 st
4th
1 st
4th
1 st
4th
1 st
4th
1 st
4th
Unknown
?
23
48
13
3
3
1
12
2
2
6
3
Serviceberry
Amelanchier canadensis
Red chokeberry
Aronia arbutifolia
Paw paw
Asima triloba
River birch
Betula nigra
American beautyberry
Callicarpa americana
Ironwood
Carpinus caroliniana
Water hickory
Carya aquatica
Sugarberry
Celtis laevigata
Buttonbush*
Cephalanthus occidentalis
1
1
1
1
1
2
1
Atlantic white cedar
Chamaecyparis thyoides
29
22
6
5
26
23
7
7
5
5
15
15
24
22
63
60
17
11
24
22
33
20
21
20
21
18
Sweet pepperbush
Clethra alnifolia
4
3
1
1
3
6
1
1
4
1
Silky dogwood
Cornus amomum
Swamp dogwood
Cornus foemina
1
2
2
1
1
1
1
1
Titi
Cyrilla racemiflora
1
1
1
1
6
4
2
2
Persimmon
Diospora virginiana
Strawberry bush
Euonymous americana
Green ash
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
1
Deciduous holly
1. decidua
Inkberry
1. glabra
1
Winterberry
Ilex verticillata
Virginia sweetspire
Itea virginica
1
3
1
1
1
2
1
Swamp doghobble
Leucothoe (Eubotrys) racemosa
Spicebush
Lindera benzoin
Fetterbush
Lyonia lucida
Sweetbay
Magnolia virginiana
7
4
1
1
2
1
9
5
1
1
2
2
Mulberry
Morus rubra
Unknown gum/tupelo
Nyssa spp.
1
2
1
Water tupelo
N. aquatica
12
2
16
7
14
9
16
16
5
4
6
4
4
5
17
13
26
20
16
12
15
14
14
14
20
17
Swamp tupelo
Nyssa biflora
12
7
13
4
20
12
6
2
2
1
9
6
7
2
1
3
3
6
5
5
3
10
8
Red bay
Persea borbonia
2
1
4
4
5
4
2
1
Pond pine
Pinus serotina
1
Sycamore
Platanus occidentalis
Oak
Quercus spp.
1
3
12
6
3
1
7
4
7
4
8
3
White oak
Q. alba
Laurel oak
Q. laurifolia
4
2
1
1
7
5
1
1
2
3
2
2
1
5
7
9
5
17
10
11
7
30
18
12
15
Overcup oak
Q. lyrata
7
5
7
13
7
2
8
5
8
3
9
34
30
21
20
19
13
52
44
15
15
10
10
Swamp chestnut oak
Q. michauxii
19
2
16
1
16
6
9
3
9
6
19
3
13
5
12
12
8
4
41
20
21
21
24
16
28
25
Water oak
Q. nigra
Cherrybark oak
Q. pagoda
Willow oak
Quercus phellos
17
7
4
1
13
7
6
1
9
2
4
2
12
6
2
2
6
5
32
14
20
16
19
16
12
11
Dwarf azalea
Rhododendron atlanticum
Swamp azalea
Rhododendron viscosum
Swamp rose
Rosa palustris
Pond cypress
Taxodium ascendens
Bald cypress
Taxodium distichum
10
10
19
19
23
23
18
17
34
31
8
8
18
18
16
15
22
23
16
15
23
23
20
20
23
24
American elm
Ulmus americana
High bush blueberry
Vaccinium corymbosum
1
1
1
1
1
1
Possumhaw
Viburnum nudum
1
1
1
2
3
1
3
2
1
1
Dusty zenobia
Zenobia pulverulenta
ALIVE STEMS
148
70
138
40 1
161
1 95
1 81
1 57
68
82
50
130
72
151
139
119
89
182
109
186
151
160
123
149
134
TOTAL STEMS
153
153
149
149
169
171
113
113]�92
103
104
1101
110
F 141
1 141 11
156
157
126
1 126 1k
198
200
194
194
167
172
158
160
P and U Lands Phase 3 Forth Annual Report B-4

Appendix B. (continued)
P and U Lands Phase 3 Forth Annual Report B-5
Zone 3
PUM187
PUM188
PUM201
PUM206
PUM207
PUM208
PUM209
PUM210
PUM211
PUM212
PUM213
Total
Common name
Scientific name
1 st
4th
1 st
4th
1 st
4th
1 st
4th
1 st
4th
1 st
4th
1 st
4th
1 st
4th
1 st
4th
1 st
4th
1 st
4th
1 st
4th
Unknown
?
6
1
1
1
3
1
9
256
Serviceberry
Amelanchier canadensis
Red chokeberry
Aronia arbutifolia
Paw paw
Asima triloba
River birch
Betula nigra
7
5
21
17
American beautyberry
Callicarpa americana
Ironwood
Carpinus caroliniana
2
3
Water hickory
Carya aquatica
2
2
Sugarberry
Celtis laevigata
1
1
Buttonbush*
Cephalanthus occidentalis
2
19
14
Atlantic white cedar
Chamaecyparis thyoides
1
1
4
4
5
2
31
30
7
5
14
13
14
13
24
20
31
23
20
20
572
502
Sweet pepperbush
Clethra alnifolia
2
2
1
1
57
40
Silky dogwood
Cornus amomum
Swamp dogwood
Cornus foemina
6
3
2
1
1
1
2
2
4
2
2
1
12
7
44
27
Titi
Cyrilla racemiflora
4
5
5
5
2
1
71
72
Persimmon
Diospora virginiana
Strawberry bush
Euonymous americana
Green ash
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
11
7
39
21
Deciduous holly
1. decidua
Inkberry
1. glabra
2
Winterberry
Ilex verticillata
1
Virginia sweetspire
Itea virginica
1
1
1
1
14
11
Swamp doghobble
Leucothoe (Eubotrys) racemosa
Spicebush
Lindera benzoin
Fetterbush
Lyonia lucida
Sweetbay
Magnolia virginiana
2
1
2
2
77
66
Mulberry
Morus rubra
Unknown gum/tupelo
Nyssa spp.
1
32
Water tupelo
N. aquatica
4
3
5
5
24
19
10
8
7
5
10
5
34
27
22
23
1
1
19
10
16
14
515
438
Swamp tupelo
Nyssa biflora
10
4
2
2
12
11
8
7
17
10
12
4
28
15
5
5
13
7
20
9
415
250
Red bay
Persea borbonia
20
18
Pond pine
Pinus serotina
1
Sycamore
Platanus occidentalis
5
1
8
1
Oak
Quercus spp.
2
7
8
5
4
4
1
3
185
White oak
Q. alba
Laurel oak
Q. laurifolia
2
3
15
10
28
13
15
5
22
15
18
17
28
19
21
11
37
32
48
21
20
17
474
326
Overcup oak
Q. lyrata
6
6
18
10
5
4
24
24
37
27
30
26
7
8
29
25
23
19
9
27
17
13
586
481
Swamp chestnut oak
Q. michauxii
18
16
10
7
14
5
28
21
20
16
29
24
16
13
17
9
11
9
22
17
16
5
736
441
Water oak
Q. nigra
Cherrybark oak
Q. pagoda
1
1
Willow oak
Quercus phellos
6
6
18
7
21
17
61
50
13
8
20
18
29
28
23
18
18
12
50
45
54
25
634
443
Dwarf azalea
Rhododendron atlanticum
Swamp azalea
Rhododendron viscosum
Swamp rose
Rosa palustris
Pond cypress
Taxodium ascendens
9
8
10
10
Bald cypress
Taxodium distichum
7
7
24
24
14
15
10
10
15
15
26
25
24
23
21
21
38
38
26
25
34
34
733
743
American elm
Ulmus americana
High bush blueberry
Vaccinium corymbosum
1
1
2
1
17
9
Possumhaw
Viburnum nudum
28
33
Dusty zenobia
Zenobia pulverulenta
ALIVE STEMSI
108
1 84
106
71
134
91
164
129
156
120
157
130
166
136
187
137
175
145
220
175
209
138
5,567
3,972
TOTAL STEMS1
119
1 119
126
128
140
141
169
170
164
164
160
162
172
172
195
195
185
187
223
223
k210
210
1 6,165
6,200
P and U Lands Phase 3 Forth Annual Report B-5

Appendix B. (continued)
P and U Lands Phase 3 Forth Annual Report B-6
Zone 4
PUM143
PUM144
PUM152
PUM153
PUM154
PUM155
PUM156
PUM157
PUM158
PUM159
PUM160
PUM161
PUM162
Common name
Scientific name
1 st
4th
1 st
4th
1 st
4th
1 st
4th
1 st
4th
1 st
4th
1 st
4th
1 st
4th
1 st
4th
1 st
4th
1 st
4th
1 st
4th
1 st
4th
Unknown
?
5
3
12
16
12
8
21
35
5
3
16
Serviceberry
Amelanchier canadensis
Red chokeberry
Aronia arbutifolia
Paw paw
Asima triloba
River birch
Betula nigra
American beautyberry
Callicarpa americana
Ironwood
Carpinus caroliniana
Water hickory
Carya aquatica
Sugarberry
Celtis laevigata
Buttonbush*
Cephalanthus occidentalis
1
3
2
1
1
Atlantic white cedar
Chamaecyparis thyoides
7
4
5
4
17
13
8
6
15
13
6
8
16
16
6
4
9
9
11
13
16
17
Sweet pepperbush
Clethra alnifolia
5
3
3
3
2
2
1
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
9
4
5
3
Silky dogwood
Cornus amomum
Swamp dogwood
Cornus foemina
1
1
Titi
Cyrilla racemiflora
1
1
Persimmon
Diospora virginiana
Strawberry bush
Euonymous americana
Green ash
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
Deciduous holly
1. decidua
2
Inkberry
1. glabra
1
1
3
Winterberry
Ilex verticillata
6
1
1
4
1
3
Virginia sweetspire
Itea virginica
3
3
1
1
1
1
2
2
2
2
1
1
1
3
6
6
Swamp doghobble
Leucothoe (Eubotrys) racemosa
Spicebush
Lindera benzoin
1
Fetterbush
Lyonia lucida
1
7
6
Sweetbay
Magnolia virginiana
1
1
2
4
8
5
23
13
1
1
4
4
8
9
2
2
2
2
4
4
6
6
Mulberry
Morus rubra
Unknown gum/tupelo
Nyssa spp.
1
Water tupelo
N. aquatica
1
2
1
1
Swamp tupelo
Nyssa biflora
22
19
12
7
11
2
46
28
25
23
41
33
17
13
20
13
20
13
13
6
37
28
13
11
15
11
Red bay
Persea borbonia
1
4
2
1
1
1
Pond pine
Pinus serotina
56
50
50
48
3
1
24
14
38
20
54
33
46
39
31
18
28
24
55
51
35
32
24
28
Sycamore
Platanus occidentalis
Oak
Quercus spp.
5
1
13
3
1
2
3
4
White oak
Q. alba
Laurel oak
Q. laurifolia
3
1
9
5
7
1
2
1
1
2
3
3
1
13
8
9
6
11
6
Overcup oak
Q. lyrata
3
1
1
1
1
2
Swamp chestnut oak
Q. michauxii
4
1
Water oak
Q. nigra
Cherrybark oak
Q. pagoda
1
Willow oak
Quercus phellos
8
2
18
15
1
3
2
2
5
4
8
5
8
5
4
10
6
19
7
7
2
Dwarf azalea
Rhododendron atlanticum
Swamp azalea
Rhododendron viscosum
Swamp rose
Rosa palustris
Pond cypress
Taxodium ascendens
11
11
3
2
Bald cypress
Taxodium distichum
8
8
24
24
15
16
4
5
2
2
15
12
10
10
20
20
20
19
35
32
41
40
42
40
16
16
American elm
Ulmus americana
High bush blueberry
Vaccinium corymbosum
4
4
2
2
1
1
1
Possumhaw
Viburnum nudum
1
1
Dusty zenobia
Zenobia pulverulenta
ALIVE STEMS1
139
96
135
118
83
40
108
65
75
57
120
77
122
82
114
87
122
79
124
69
168
137
158
124
140
103
TOTAL STEMS1
157
157
153
153
93
94
110
110
89
90
141
141
131
131
116
116
132
134
129
129
180
180
172
174
154
155
P and U Lands Phase 3 Forth Annual Report B-6

Appendix B. (continued)
P and U Lands Phase 3 Forth Annual Report B-7
Zone 4
PUM163
PUM164
PUM165
PUM166
PUM167
PUM168
PUM169
PUM170
PUM171
PUM174
PUM175
PUM176
PUM180
Common name
Scientific name
1 st
4th
1 st
4th
1 st
4th
1 st
4th
1 st
4th
1 st
4th
1 st
4th
1 st
4th
1 st
4th
1 st
4th
1 st
4th
1 st
4th
1 st
4th
Unknown
?
3
16
15
3
5
12
2
7
17
4
Serviceberry
Amelanchier canadensis
Red chokeberry
Aronia arbutifolia
Paw paw
Asima triloba
River birch
Betula nigra
American beautyberry
Callicarpa americana
Ironwood
Carpinus caroliniana
Water hickory
Carya aquatica
Sugarberry
Celtis laevigata
Buttonbush*
Cephalanthus occidentalis
1
1
3
3
1
2
Atlantic white cedar
Chamaecyparis thyoides
27
25
15
13
14
12
17
16
5
5
20
17
50
40
22
21
18
18
13
13
25
24
31
31
43
43
Sweet pepperbush
Clethra alnifolia
1
5
3
1
1
3
2
5
2
5
3
1
2
4
3
2
2
2
2
Silky dogwood
Cornus amomum
Swamp dogwood
Cornus foemina
Titi
Cyn1la racemiflora
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
Persimmon
Diospora virginiana
Strawberry bush
Euonymous americana
Green ash
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
Deciduous holly
1. decidua
1
1
Inkberry
1. glabra
2
3
3
1
1
Winterberry
Ilex verticillata
1
4
1
5
3
2
Virginia sweetspire
Itea virginica
2
1
1
1
8
8
5
3
3
3
2
1
Swamp doghobble
Leucothoe (Eubotrys) racemosa
Spicebush
Lindera benzoin
Fetterbush
Lyonia lucida
1
1
Sweetbay
Magnolia virginiana
7
7
2
5
1
2
1
1
1
8
7
3
3
5
6
3
3
4
1
5
5
Mulberry
Morus rubra
Unknown gum/tupelo
Nyssa spp.
Water tupelo
N. aquatica
1
5
4
1
1
Swamp tupelo
Nyssa biflora
16
9
11
9
27
23
16
14
13
9
20
14
11
12
16
15
15
12
19
16
6
3
21
11
Red bay
Persea borbonia
5
2
5
1
2
4
3
1
1
1
3
1
1
1
Pond pine
Pinus serotina
27
17
66
45
34
24
38
27
56
37
10
8
46
46
62
55
42
41
35
33
29
28
48
46
Sycamore
Platanus occidentalis
Oak
Quercus spp.
2
8
3
1
5
2
2
3
2
8
1
White oak
Q. alba
Laurel oak
Q. laurifolia
2
1
2
9
3
3
3
3
1
3
15
14
4
3
27
14
16
6
9
1
12
10
Overcup oak
Q. lyrata
Swamp chestnut oak
Q. michauxii
Water oak
Q. nigra
1
Cherrybark oak
Q. pagoda
Willow oak
Quercus phellos
6
1
3
4
2
5
4
6
3
2
3
4
17
13
32
33
11
5
10
4
18
15
Dwarf azalea
Rhododendron atlanticum
Swamp azalea
Rhododendron viscosum
Swamp rose
Rosa palustris
Pond cypress
Taxodium ascendens
3
3
Bald cypress
Taxodium distichum
30
29
18
18
17
19
9
9
4
4
23
22
25
25
11
11
7
8
18
18
25
24
20
20
American elm
Ulmus americana
High bush blueberry
Vaccinium corymbosum
1
1
6
6
1
1
2
2
Possumhaw
Viburnum nudum
Dusty zenobia
Zenobia pulverulenta
ALIVE STEMS1
124
94
147
94
114
86
107
76
100
67
73
49
105
73
166
149
145
130
152
125
140
110
148
98
175
153
TOTAL STEMS1
161
161
155
155
141
165
108
109
127
127
108
107
107
108
172
172
165
166
155
155
146
147
160
160
176
176
P and U Lands Phase 3 Forth Annual Report B-7

Appendix B. (continued)
Zone 5
PUM110
Zone 4
PUM173
PUM177
Total
Common name
Scientific name
1 st
4th
Unknown
?
220
4th
Serviceberry
Amelanchier canadensis
1 st
4th
Red chokeberry
Aronia arbutifolia
1 st
4th
Paw paw
Asima triloba
3
1
River birch
Betula nigra
10
10
American beautyberry
Callicarpa americana
13
1
Ironwood
Carpinus caroliniana
Water hickory
Carya aquatica
Sugarberry
Celtis laevigata
2
Buttonbush
Cephalanthus occidentalis
13
6
Atlantic white cedar
Chamaecyparis thyoides
416
385
Sweet pepperbush
Clethra alnifolia
57
40
Silky dogwood
Cornus amomum
1
Swamp dogwood
Cornus foemina
1
1
Titi
Cyrilla racemiflora
4
7
Persimmon
Diospora virginiana
3
1
Strawberry bush
Euonymous americana
10
6
Green ash
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
1
Deciduous holly
1. decidua
3
1
Inkberry
1. glabra
4
11
Winterberry
Ilex verticillata
25
7
Virginia sweetspire
Itea virginica
36
38
Swamp doghobble
Leucothoe (Eubotrys) racemosa
4
4
Spicebush
Lindera benzoin
1
4
Fetterbush
Lyonia lucida
9
7
Sweetbay
Magnolia virginiana
102
90
Mulberry
Morus rubra
Unknown gum/tupelo
Nyssa spp.
1
1
Water tupelo
N. aquatica
9
8
Swamp tupelo
Nyssa biflora
483
354
Red bay
Persea borbonia
31
10
Pond pine
Pinus serotina
937
765
Sycamore
Platanus occidentalis
4
Oak
Quercus spp.
69
1
White oak
Q. alba
1
1
Laurel oak
Q. laurifolia
166
87
Overcup oak
Q. lyrata
5
4
Swamp chestnut oak
Q. michauxii
4
1
Water oak
Q. nigra
1
Cherrybark oak
Q. pagoda
1
Willow oak
Quercus phellos
211
131
Dwarf azalea
Rhododendron atlanticum
1
Swamp azalea
Rhododendron viscosum
4
12
Swamp rose
Rosa palustris
1
Pond cypress
Taxodium ascendens
17
16
Bald cypress
Taxodium distichum
459
451
American elm
Ulmus americana
7
6
High bush blueberry
Vaccinium corymbosum
17
18
Possumhaw
Viburnum nudum
2
8
Dusty zenobia
Zenobia pulverulenta
12
10
ALIVE STEMS1
3,304
2,438
TOTAL STEMS1
3,638
3,648
Zone 5
PUM110
PUM172
PUM173
PUM177
PUM181
PUM185
Total
1 st
4th
1 st
4th
1 st
4th
1 st
4th
1 st
4th
1 st
4th
1 st
4th
9
3
1
2
10
10
5
1
13
1
42
2
3
2
2
20
8
2
1
2
1
1
2
1
1
26
10
3
4
3
2
3
1
1
10
6
2
1
1
1
2
1
2
3
15
2
1
3
1
1
4
4
4
4
8
4
11
8
2
2
7
6
4
4
32
24
1
4
1
1
2
2
1
1
1
3
4
7
6
1
2
4
3
6
1
1
1
2
1
1
1
1
1
2
1
1
1
2
1
1
11
2
1
7
4
12
8
1
1
3
3
3
2
5
6
7
6
4
4
17
15
9
8
17
15
12
10
16
13
4
5
12
10
70
61
7
4
3
4
20
18
9
7
26
18
4
2
69
53
84
44
44
91
92
1
1
1
1
5
3
11
11
16
14
4
9
6
5
3
5
32
17
7
9
4
13
7
24
13
16
13
10
13
89
57
12
11
25
15
17
13
11
14
11
7
76
60
1
1
11
6
17
8
23
21
29
14
12
9
30
17
122
75
4
4
12
12
17
17
8
9
8
8
40
40
89
90
1
1
4
2
1
2
5
1
2
7
12
3
3
8
7
1
1
1
1
13
12
112
65
128
82
120
93
136
92
115
87
115
83
726
502
119
119
133
134
126
126
151
153
142
142
124
125
795
799
Zone 6
PUM134
PUM145
PUM146
PUM148
1 st
4th
1 st
4th
1 st
4th
1 st
4th
12
4
3
6
1
10
4
1
1
3
2
14
15
1
1
1
1
1
1
3
1
2
2
1
1
1
5
2
3
15
8
5
3
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
1
1
2
2
1
1
1
3
2
7
6
4
3
6
1
1
4
2
1
1
2
1
2
1
10
11
2
1
7
4
12
8
20
18
7
1
6
5
6
3
3
3
3
1
2
2
1
2
2
89
52
36
4
38
23
59
37
105
106
84
84
44
44
91
92
P and U Lands Phase 3 Forth Annual Report B-8

Appendix B. (concluded)
Gum Swamp Run Buffer Plot
A
Zone 6
C
D
Total
Common name
Scientific name
1 st
4th
Unknown
o
25
4th
Serviceberry
Amelanchier canadensis
1 st
4th
Red chokeberry
Aronia arbutifolia
1 st
4th
Paw paw
Asima triloba
4
River birch
Betula nigra
1
American beautyberry
Callicarpa americana
6
Ironwood
Carpinus caroliniana
12
4
Water hickory
Carya aquatica
Sugarberry
Celtis laevigata
Buttonbush
Cephalanthus occidentalis
3
2
Atlantic white cedar
Chamaecyparis thyoides
14
15
Sweet pepperbush
Clethra alnifolia
3
3
Silky dogwood
Cornus amomum
3
Swamp dogwood
Cornus foemina
Titi
Cyn1la racemiflora
1
Persimmon
Diospora virginiana
4
3
Strawberry bush
Euonymous americana
1
1
Green ash
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
28
10
Deciduous holly
1. decidua
3
1
Inkberry
1. glabra
3
3
Winterberry
Ilex verticillata
Virginia sweetspire
Itea virginica
Swamp doghobble
Leucothoe (Eubotrys) racemosa
1
1
Spicebush
Lindera benzoin
5
5
Fetterbush
Lyonia lucida
1
Sweetbay
Magnolia virginiana
4
1
Mulberry
Morus rubra
2
Unknown gum/tupelo
Nyssa spp.
1
Water tupelo
N. aquatica
1
8
Swamp tupelo
Nyssa biflora
2
3
Red bay
Persea borbonia
4
8
Pond pine
Pinus serotina
Sycamore
Platanus occidentalis
Oak
Quercus spp.
13
White oak
Q. alba
15
6
Laurel oak
Q. laurifolia
1
1
Overcup oak
Q. lyrata
2
1
Swamp chestnut oak
Q. michauxii
2
1
Water oak
Q. nigra
19
16
Cherrybark oak
Q. pagoda
12
8
Willow oak
Quercus phellos
39
27
Dwarf azalea
Rhododendron atlanticum
1
Swamp azalea
Rhododendron viscosum
Swamp rose
Rosa palustris
Pond cypress
Taxodium ascendens
1
Bald cypress
Taxodium distichum
3
3
American elm
Ulmus americana
9
2
High bush blueberry
Vaccinium corymbosum
Possumhaw
Viburnum nudum
1
2
Dusty zenobia
Zenobia pulverulenta
ALIVE STEMS1
222
1 116
TOTAL STEMS1
324
1 326
Gum Swamp Run Buffer Plot
A
B
C
D
E
F
Total
1 st
4th
1 st
4th
1 st
4th
1 st
4th
1 st
4th
1 st
4th
1 st
4th
2
4
11
3
7
6
33
1
5
5
5
6
1
0
1
1
1
1
1
1
8
11
14
1
1
3
1
11
3
3
3
30
30
3
3
1
1
1
1
5
5
1
1
2
1
8
1
8
10
9
16
13
1
27
40
1
4
3
4
4
8
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
1
1
3
7
7
25
27
24
20
21
18
20
10
6
9
103
91
1
2
3
2
4
3
3
6
1
3
7
4
10
11
12
12
23
23
3
56
53
16
26
53
65
47
40
51
42
81
54
2423
272
250
16
28
53
67
47
52
51
51
81
84
24
31
272
313
P and U Lands Phase 3 Forth Annual Report B-9

APPENDIX C
Selected Fourth Annual (2017) P and U Lands Phase 3 Restoration
Photographs

NOTE: A 10 -foot pole marked in one -foot increments held by a biologist about 25 feet from the
camera is visible in all photos. The photos are identified with the station number (see Figure 2),
direction of view, and date taken.
PLPS 5: northeast, top photo 2 November 2017, bottom photo 23 October 2014.
P and U Lands Restoration Site Phase 3 Appendix C-1 PCS Phosphate Company, Inc.
Fourth Annual Report May 2018

PLPS 6: northwest, top photo 2 November 2017, bottom photo 23 October 2014.
P and U Lands Restoration Site Phase 3 Appendix C-2 PCS Phosphate Company, Inc.
Fourth Annual Report May 2018

0
PLPS 14: southeast, top photo 2 November 2017, bottom photo 22 October 2014.
P and U Lands Restoration Site Phase 3 Appendix C-3 PCS Phosphate Company, Inc.
Fourth Annual Report May 2018

PLPS 15: northwest, top photo 2 November 2017, bottom photo 22 October 2014.
P and U Lands Restoration Site Phase 3 Appendix C-4 PCS Phosphate Company, Inc.
Fourth Annual Report May 2018

_ _ � Mi -- _
x-:
�•s
+�, F,�' �
�- � ,� ,
-. ,� .. ,,
s
�' r�"�`'
� .
._ � ��..
f �. � � �, 4
� �
Y 1
S M � �
t I
���
i ��
S ,
�f' w, 1'
'r
�
�i+�
, I �".
'f' dj
�
��y
i
�
� , ,
I
�
s � i
� 1
'
1, 4
. ,, �
�
,�
' ,i
j
_
'� �
i
�
�; ��
,:� ��
� A
�e✓
��
1
_ _ � Mi -- _
x-:
�•s
+�, F,�' �
�- � ,� ,
-. ,� .. ,,
s
�' r�"�`'
� .
._ � ��..
f �. � � �, 4

PLPS 16: southwest, top photo 2 November 2017, bottom photo 22 October 2014.
P and U Lands Restoration Site Phase 3 Appendix C-6 PCS Phosphate Company, Inc.
Fourth Annual Report May 2018

YRS• ���^ ` �a --�
.vT_....r .�... is

PLPS 17: northwest, top photo 2 Novmeber 2017, bottom photo 22 October 2014.
P and U Lands Restoration Site Phase 3 Appendix C-8 PCS Phosphate Company, Inc.
Fourth Annual Report May 2018

IJv �144OW-

i
` f or

4 ; �r,3.i.;� �.�1' r)7v �� �a1 �. ) tip ✓
i
k
F
�
F
i
X
Tl`
t
�- � . i "`lam
t �J'- _ � i •
- � iYc. _ _' �R
_ . ':'y

PLPS 20: northeast, top photo 2 November 2017, bottom photo 22 October 2014.
P and U Lands Restoration Site Phase 3 Appendix C-13 PCS Phosphate Company, Inc.
Fourth Annual Report May 2018

PLPS 20: northwest, top photo 2 November 2017, bottom photo 22 October 2014.
P and U Lands Restoration Site Phase 3 Appendix C-14 PCS Phosphate Company, Inc.
Fourth Annual Report May 2018
`...•`��. it
.
r
1
Y_-
I•
�
R
5
s
•
' r� I
':�`I'�°
' t
1 �:f,�
4 7 �i �.
-•moi'\
Alf—
J0
�i '\11 :'t;..�E {,. �'
` � :Ar �
tj ��r Ela;; � �E�E}1�� �•
J-. .�i 'IIi ':
lL: :"p�, ��i•.�
V i,1•Li 1.' - •i.\�t�- ���
PLPS 20: northwest, top photo 2 November 2017, bottom photo 22 October 2014.
P and U Lands Restoration Site Phase 3 Appendix C-14 PCS Phosphate Company, Inc.
Fourth Annual Report May 2018

PLPS 23: southeast, top photo 2 November 2017, bottom photo 22 October 2014.
P and U Lands Restoration Site Phase 3 Appendix C-15 PCS Phosphate Company, Inc.
Fourth Annual Report May 2018

PLPS 25: northeast, top photo 2 November 2017, bottom photo 22 October 2014.
P and U Lands Restoration Site Phase 3 Appendix C-16 PCS Phosphate Company, Inc.
Fourth Annual Report May 2018