510129_Compliance Evaluation Inspection_20200219

WS 1�lw t)al-u
V Division of Water Resources
Facility Number - ® 0 Division of Soil and Water Conservation
0 Other Agency
Type of Visit: IR Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit: I El Arrival Time:
Farm Name: Hq M r-fl(+t I
Owner Name:
Mailing Address:
Departure Time: County: Region: 99Q
Owner Email:
Phone:
Physical Address: T N
Facility Contact: $joltmjichipfj Title: C&SiJ464- Phone:
Onsite Representative: Bf84 H "elf NV' 111t Maya Integrator: 6dd,Ad, H;1hh4
Certified Operator: 14.1"Cift Haleo Certification Number: $
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Swine
Wean to Finish
Wean to Feeder
Feeder to Finish
Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder
Farrow to Finish
Boars
Other
Other
Certification Number:
Latitude:
Design Current Design Current
Capacity Pop. Wet Poultry Capacity Pop.
Layer
Non -La er
Pullets
Other
Poults
Design Current
Discharges and Stream impacts
I . Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWR)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWR)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters
of the State other than from a discharge?
Longitude:
Design Current
Cattle Capacity Pop.
Dairy Cow
Dairy Calf
Dairy Heifer
Dry Cow
Non -Dairy
Beef Stocker
Beef Feeder
Beef Brood Cow
❑ Yes 0 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes No
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑NA ❑NE
❑NA ❑NE
Page 1 of 3 21412015 Continued

Facili Number: - Ja Date of Inspection: a
Waste Collection & Treatment of "T
NVY
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑Yes [No @a NA ❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in): —�
Observed Freeboard (in):-
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes NJ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
❑ Yes
1Z No
❑ NA
❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental
threat, notify DWR
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑ Yes
0 No
❑ NA
❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit?
❑ Yes
Callo
❑ NA
❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
❑ Yes
bg No
0 NA
❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
❑ Yes
[5�No
❑ NA
❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes P No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground
❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑
Failure to Incorporate Manure?Sludge into
Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift
0 Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s): Coil&
I fartlife,` sn
&471"j)
13. Soil Type(s): 6 P_ 1
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
❑ Yes ® No
❑ NA
❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ Yes [0 No
❑ NA
❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable
❑ Yes ® No
❑ NA
❑ NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑Yes No ❑NA ❑NE
❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
[)-g No
❑ NA ❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components ofthe CAWMP readily available? Ifyes, check
❑ Yes
[�g No
❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑ WUP ❑Checklists ❑ Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements
❑Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement? Ifyes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes
� No
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis
❑ Waste Transfers
❑ Weather Code
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stacking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections
❑ Sludge Survey
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑ Yes
® No
❑ NA ❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes R No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 21412015 Coalinued

Facility Number: 51 d Date of Inspection:
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑ Yes
])-a No
❑ NA ❑ NE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check
❑ Yes
l;;Z;' No
❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑ Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification?
❑ Yes
No
[] NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document
❑ Yes
❑ No
® NA ❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
24. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
❑ Yes
C'No
❑ NA ❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
❑ Yes
0No
❑ NA ❑ NE
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes
VNo
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
❑ Yes
�gNo
❑ NA ❑ NE
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
❑ Yes
[)_� No
❑ NA ❑ NE
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency?
❑ Yes
E�a No
❑ NA ❑ NE
Comments (refer to question ft Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations (use additional pages as necessary).
16- qw i ('Win v )b ed b.�y -fh?- aid of a oa I,
.�_ [ud bSvr�rJJJ 3�l1q Sll�d �.aT-�r rn}S'Ptl' tr`7t`
Ca<or�a, 1o��sil� -are �, 3�o-P-I-. 1Vee-ifs Pc�
a l- w16� Am
-71301Iq h►r7��
a jjajjq yV 00 ra a 1 s �ejPd C� ),' rc are e l ° t b�� C� I'� P`-1
sp 1rtPj f 1113118 sL D& `� , lea l�m,e n �� - .9�'
b-94eeii boo �+a� 600 = �Ueed PLAT be&re. 1a1ar l'3oap l�t- QnAe-
h at cap b t*r,
Sxallm- l a jot� berm coy
o, iia �s up *o dAe
Reviewer Inspector Name: �Fo_w cSanfkr Phone: 919-7ql — Hi 3
Reviewer:Inspector Signature: Date: i q,ao a O
Page 3 of 3 U 21412015