20010833 Ver 1_COMPLETE FILE_20010529

() OF WATFq%
Mr. Bennett Keasler
7200 Stonehenge Drive
Suite 306
Raleigh, NC 27613
r

o ?
May 29, 2002
Subject: Stormwater Management
Stonehaven
Wake County, NC
DWQ# 010833
Dear Mr. Keasler:
This Office is in receipt of the plans dated May 22, 2002 for stormwater management at the subject
facility prepared on your behalf by Aiken & Yelle Associates and submitted to the Division on May 23, 2002.
The plans indicate that all stormwater from the roads, lots and future houses will flow in a diffuse manner at
non-erosive velocities through the entire Neuse buffer. Staff from the Wetlands Unit reviewed the plans and
found them acceptable.
cc
Michael F. Easley
Governor
William G. Ross, Jr., Secretary
Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Gregory J. Thorpe, Ph.D., Acting Director
Division of Water Quality
If you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact Mr. Todd St. John at [phone].
Mr. Todd St. John, Wetlands
Raleigh Regional Office
File
North Carolina Division of Water Quality, 401 Wetlands Certification Unit,
1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1650 (Mailing Address)
2321 Crabtree Blvd., Raleigh, NC 27604-2260 (Location)
919-733-1786 (phone), 919-733-6893 !rax), http://h2o.pni.state.nc.us/ncwetiands/
Aiken & Yelle Associates, PA
Professional Engineers & Land Surveyors
3755 Benson Drive
AYES
Raleigh, North Carolina 27609
Phone: [phone] Fax: [phone]
May 22, 2002
Mr. Todd St. John
Division of Water Quality
401 Wetlands Certification
2321 Crabtree Blvd.
Raleigh, NC 27604-2260
23
RE: Stonehaven Subdivision, Wake County, NC
DWQ# 01-0833
Dear Todd:
Enclosed is a set of revised construction drawings for approval of the Stonehaven
Subdivision. This is being submitted in accordance with the additionally requested
information included on your letter dated May 7, 2002.
Feel free to call our office if you have any questions.
Sincerel ,
Harold A. Yelle II, PE, PLS
o??? W A r ?RQ?
r
O `ii? --?'
Michael F. Easley
Governor
William G. Ross, Jr., Secretary
Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Gregory J. Thorpe, Ph.D., Acting Director
Division of Water Quality
May 7, 2002
Mr. Harold Yelle, PE
Aiken and Yelle Associates
3755 Benson Drive
Raleigh, NC 27609
Dear Mr. Yelle:
Subject:
Stonehaven Subdivision
DWQ Project No. 010833
Wake County
The Wetlands Unit staff reviewed the stormwater management plans for the subject project and determined that additional
information is necessary to complete the technical review process. The required additional information is as follows:
Stormwater From Individual Lots
The 401 Water Quality Certification and Neuse Buffer Rule Approval dated October 31, 2001 requires that
stormwater from the lots must be provided. If no house or grading plans are available at this time, a verbal
description of the measures to be taken to ensure that diffuse flow shall be provided will be acceptable.
Division wetlands unit staff will strive to complete a final technical review within 10 working days of receipt of the
requested information. If you have any questions or would like to discuss this project, please contact me at (919) 733-
9584.
Sincerely,
Todd t. John, PE
Environmental Engineer
cc: Raleigh Regional Office
Bob Zarzecki
File
North Carolina Division of Water Quality, 401 Wetlands Certification Unit,
1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1650 (Mailing Address)
2321 Crabtree Blvd., Raleigh, NC 27604-2260 (Location)
919-733-1786 (phone), 919-733-6893 (tax), http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetiands/
Aiken & Yelle Associates, PA
AYES Professional Engineers & Land Surveyors
()3755 Benson Drive
Raleigh, North Carolina 27609
Phone: [phone] Fax: [phone]
April 5, 2002
Mr. Todd St. John
Division of Water Quality
401 Wetlands Certification Unit
2321 Crabtree Blvd.
Raleigh, NC 27604-2260
RE: Stonehaven Subdivision, Wake County, NC
DWQ# 01-0833
Dear Todd:
As per our conversation, enclosed is a set of construction drawings for approval of the
Stonehaven Subdivision. This is being submitted in accordance with the enclosed
approval letter from DWQ dated October 31, 2001.
Feel free to call our office if you have any questions.
Sincerely,
Harold A. Yelle II, PE, PLS
- WgTF?4
O G
r
>_ y
Michael F. Easley
Govemor
William G. Ross, Jr., Secretary
Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Gregory J. Thorpe, Ph.D.
Acting Director
Division of Water Quality
October 31, 2001
DWQ# 01-0833
Wake County
Mr. Bennett Keasler
7200 Stonehenge Drive
Suite 306
Raleigh, NC 27613
APPROVAL of 401 Water Quality Certification and Neuse River Buffer Rules with Additional Conditions
Dear Mr. Keasler:
You have our approval, in accordance with the attached conditions, to place fill in 277 linear feet of
streams and 0.39 acre of Neuse Buffers in order to construct the Stonehaven subdivision in Wake County, as
described in your fevised application received by the Division of Water Quality on September 4, 2001 (dated
August 31, 2001) with a revised plan dated August 21, 2001. After reviewing your application, we have
determined that this fill is covered by General Water Quality Certification Number 3289. This Certification allows
you to use Nationwide Permit Number 14.when it is issued by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. This approval
is also valid for the Neuse River Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0233). In addition, you should get any other
federal, state or local permits before you go ahead with your project including (but not limited to) Sediment and
Erosion Control, Non-Discharge and Water Supply Watershed regulations. Also this approval will expire when
the accompanying 404 permit expires unless otherwise specified in the General Certification.
This approval is only valid for the purpose and design that you described in your application. If you
change your project, you must notify us and you may be required to send us a new application for a new
certification. If the property is sold, the new owner must be given a copy of the Certification and approval letter
and is thereby responsible for complying with all conditions. If total wetland fills for this project (now or in the
future) exceed one acre, compensatory mitigation may be required as described in 15A NCAC 2H .0506 (h). For
this approval to be valid, you must follow the conditions listed in the attached certification and the additional
conditions listed below:
1. Deed notifications or similar mechanisms shall be placed on all lots with remaining streams or that contain
areas within 50 feet of all streams. These features and the corresponding buffer zones must be clearly
marked on these deeds. These mechanisms shall be put in place within 60 days of the date of this letter or
the issuance of the 404 Permit (whichever is later). A sample deed notification format can be downloaded
from the 401/Wetlands Unit web site at http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlarids.
2. An additional condition is that stormwater shall be directed to diffuse flow at non-erosive velocities through
the protected stream buffers with level spreaders at the upslope edge of Zone 2. Additional written DWQ
approval is required for the final stormwater plan before stream impacts occur. This plan must address
stormwater from all of the lots, roadways and stream crossings in the subdivision.;
3. The upslope edge of Zone 1 must be clearly marked with construction fencing in the field before construction
begins. This fencing must remain in place and be maintained until all construction in the subdivision is
complete.
4. Zone 2 may be cleared and utilized for construction activities as long as the area is left vegetated after
construction is complete.
5. The driveway for lot 14. must be located as close to the boundary of lots 13 and 14 or constructed to share a
driveway with lot 13 as allowed by City of Raleigh subdivision regulations.
North Carolina Division of Water Quality, 401 Wetlands Certification Unit,
1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1650 (Mailing Address)
9` 91 (:rohfrnn Rktrl Kir, ern ne nnnn it _--
1 Page 2 of 2
6. Zone 1 and Zone 2 of the protected buffers must not be impacted during construction of lots 4, 5, 7, 14 and
15 except as allowed for a driveway for lot 14 and the road crossings for the subdivision. The edge of Zone 2
must be staked off on these lots before construction begins to ensure that the homes are constructed entirely
outside the buffer.
7. DWQ shall be sent a copy of the house footprint for lot 4 that is in compliance with the Neuse River Riparian
protection rules. Additional written approval is required from DWQ to ensure that the house will be located
outside the buffer and that diffuse flow is maintained through the buffer.
8. Additional written DWQ approval is required if the stream channel at the first road crossing must be realigned
or relocated outside the edge of the construction limits as shown on the revised site plan.
9. Upon completion of the project, the applicant shall complete and return the enclosed "Certification of
Completion Form" to notify DWQ that all work approved by this Certification has been completed. The
responsible, party shall complete the attached form and return it to the 401 /Wetlands Unit of the Division of
Water Quality.
If you do not accept any of the conditions of this certification, you may ask for an adjudicatory hearing.
You must act within 60 days of the date that you receive this letter. To ask for a hearing, send a written petition
conforming to Chapter 150B of the North Carolina General Statutes to the Office of Administrative Hearings,
P.O. Box 27447, Raleigh, N.C. 27611-7447. This certification and its conditions are final and binding unless you
ask for a hearing.
This letter completes the review of the Division of Water Quality under Section 401 of the Clean Water
Act. If you have any questions, please telephone John Dorney at 919-733-9646.
Sincerely,
I r kDq
ry J. q pe, P
Attachments
cc: Corps of Engineers Raleigh Field Office
Raleigh DWQ Regional Office
Central Files
File Copy
Brian Ruff; The Prescott Co.; 16 Chancery Place; Durham, NC 27706
Alice Lutz; 8305 Druids Lane; Raleigh, NC 27613
Lucy Ringland; 3200 Ringland Rd.; Raleigh, NC 27613
Todd St. John
010833
?OF W A TF9 p Michael F. Easley
?O G Governor
r William G. Ross, Jr., Secretary
Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Gregory J. Thorpe, Ph.D.
Acting Director
Division of Water Quality
Mr. Bennett Keasler
7200 Stonehenge Drive
Suite 306
Raleigh, NC 27613
October 31, 2001
DWQ# 01-0833
Wake County
APPROVAL of 401 Water Quality Certification and Neuse River Buffer Rules with Additional Conditions
Dear Mr. Keasler:
You have our approval, in accordance with the attached conditions, to place fill in 277 linear feet of
streams and 0.39 acre of Neuse Buffers in order to construct the Stonehaven subdivision in Wake County, as
described in your fevised application received by the Division of Water Quality on September 4, 2001 (dated
August 31, 2001) with a revised plan dated August 21, 2001. After reviewing your application, we have
determined that this fill is covered by General Water Quality Certification Number 3289. This Certification allows
you to use Nationwide Permit Number 14 when it is issued by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. This approval
is also valid for the Neuse River Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0233). In addition, you should get any other
federal, state or local permits before you go ahead with your project including (but not limited to) Sediment and
Erosion Control, Non-Discharge and Water Supply Watershed regulations. Also this approval will expire when
the accompanying 404 permit expires unless otherwise specified in the General Certification.
This approval is only valid for the purpose and design that you described in your application. If you
change your project, you must notify us and you may be required to send us a new application for a new
certification. If the property is sold, the new owner must be given a copy of the Certification and approval letter
and is thereby responsible for complying with all conditions. If total wetland fills for this project (now or in the
future) exceed one acre, compensatory mitigation may be required as described in 15A NCAC 2H .0506 (h). For
this approval to be valid, you must follow the conditions listed in the attached certification and the additional
conditions listed below:
1. Deed notifications or similar mechanisms shall be placed on all lots with remaining streams or that contain
areas within 50 feet of all streams. These features and the corresponding buffer zones must be clearly
marked on these deeds. These mechanisms shall be put in place within 60 days of the date of this letter or
the issuance of the 404 Permit (whichever is later). A sample deed notification format can be downloaded
from the 401/Wetlands Unit web site at http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands.
2. An additional condition is that stormwater shall be directed to diffuse flow at non-erosive velocities through
the protected stream buffers with level spreaders at the upslope edge of Zone 2. Additional written DWQ
approval is required for the final stormwater plan before stream impacts occur. This plan must address
stormwater from all of the lots, roadways and stream crossings in the subdivision.;
The upslope edge of Zone 1 must be clearly marked with construction fencing in the field before construction
-,ins. This fencing must remain in place and be maintained until all construction in the subdivision is
'+e.
lay be cleared and utilized for construction activities as long as the area is left vegetated after
n is complete.
for lot 14 must be located as close to the boundary of lots 13 and 14 or constructed to share a
lot 13 as allowed by City of Raleigh subdivision regulations.
.olina Division of Water Quality, 401 Wetlands Certification Unit,
.ail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1650 (Mailing Address)
rabtree Blvd., Raleigh, NC 27604-2260 (Location)
roo 4-r00 i..ti.,..,.? nin inn corm 1;__? ti«...,n.n.........?.. b.........1..,....M,.....1.-1

Page 2 of 2
6. Zone 1 and Zone 2 of the protected buffers must not be impacted during construction of lots 4, 5, 7, 14 and
15 except as allowed for a driveway for lot 14 and the road crossings for the subdivision. The edge of Zone 2
must be staked off on these lots before construction begins to ensure that the homes are constructed entirely
outside the buffer.
7. DWQ shall be sent a copy of the house footprint for lot 4 that is in compliance with the Neuse River Riparian
protection rules. Additional written approval is required from DWQ to ensure that the house will be located
outside the buffer and that diffuse flow is maintained through the buffer.
8. Additional written DWQ approval is required if the stream channel at the first road crossing must be realigned
or relocated outside the edge of the construction limits as shown on the revised site plan.
9. Upon completion of the project, the applicant shall complete and return the enclosed "Certification of
Completion Form" to notify DWQ that all work approved by this Certification has been completed. The
responsible party shall complete the attached form and return it to the 401 /Wetlands Unit of the Division of
Water Quality.
If you do not accept any of the conditions of this certification, you may ask for an adjudicatory hearing.
You must act within 60 days of the date that you receive this letter. To ask for a hearing, send a written petition
conforming to Chapter 150B of the North Carolina General Statutes to the Office of Administrative Hearings,
P.O. Box 27447, Raleigh, N.C. 27611-7447. This certification and its conditions are final and binding unless you
ask for a hearing.
This letter completes the review of the Division of Water Quality under Section 401 of the Clean Water
Act. If you have any questions, please telephone John Dorney at 919-733-9646.
Sincerely,
ry J. rpe, Ph
Attachments
cc: Corps of Engineers Raleigh Feld Office
Raleigh DWQ Regional Office
Central Files
File Copy
Brian Ruff; The Prescott Co.; 16 Chancery Place; Durham, NC 27706
Alice Lutz; 8305 Druids Lane; Raleigh, NC 27613
Lucy Ringland; 3200 Ringland Rd.; Raleigh, NC 27613
Todd St. John
010833
Division of Water Quafity
MEMO Fro 4'J Date: oh 1 U I
To: Subject:
TO T 11J Aell P I 1(444 C&U /44
pR,)tef t s 14W CJ
;r d4VIr"-,J 1"s
pf?
U-?s p S ?r? wad` ??
hlon s?
Pr
NCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Nat?f, /i
PO Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 / Ph6A6.
Gregory J. Thorne, Ph.D.
Acting Director, Division of Water Quality
Department of Environment and Natural Resources
512 North Salisbury Street
Raleigh, North Carolina 27604-1 148
RE: Stonehaven Subdivision
Dear Dr. Thorpe:
You received recently a memorandum dated October 26, 2001, from John Dorney, and a package
of letters requesting a public hearing. As the managing member of Stonehaven\North Raleigh,
LLC., the group seeking the permits to proceed with that project, 1 am requesting that you
decline to grant the requests for public hearing and instruct Mr. Dorney to issue the 401
Certifications and Neuse Buffer Rules approval. I would appreciate an opportunity to meet with
you regarding this matter at your earliest convenience, preferably on Monday, October 29, 2001.
Mr. Dorney's memorandum provides a chronology for your consideration. We have a slightly
different view of the events detailed by Mr. Dorney.
May 29, 2001 - application submitted to 401/Wetlands Unit
July 10, 2001 - "on-hold" letter issued [42 days after application submittal
July 11, 2001 - response to "on-hold" inquiries
July 31, 2001 - supplemental information submitted pertinent to "on-hold" inquiries
August 15, 2001 - notification to applicant of recommendation to deny request for minor
variance to Neuse Buffer rules [assuming the information requested was fully submitted on July
31, 2001, 57 days of review time elapsed since application submittal. Assuming the response
was complete on July 11, 77 review days had elapsed]
August 21, 2001 - revised plans submitted to address DWQ concerns
August 28, 2001 - "on-hold" letter issued [assuming that the August 15 notification constituted
an "on-hold" letter, either 64 or 84 days of review time elapsed since application submittal. If
the August 15 letter was not an "on-hold" letter, which it did not purport on its face to be, then
either 70 or 90 review days had elapsed]
September 4, 2001 - additional supporting information submitted to DWQ; RRO recommends
issuance of 401 certification and Neuse Buffet- Rules Approval.
October 2, 2001 - first of a series of'35 letters from concerned citizens is received by DWQ;
additional letters are received on October 5, 9, 10 and 11, and a package of form letters dated
October 10 are included in the October 26 memorandum; the October 10 forms have no date
stamp indicating when they were received by DWQ [As of October 2, an additional 28 days
review days have passed, for a total of as few as 92 or as many as 118 review days which had
elapsed. The requests for public hearing occurred after the recommendation for issuance by Mr.
Mitchell of the RRO]
Mr. Dorney offers November 2, 2001, as the date by which EMC rules require final action by the
Director of the Division of Water Quality. Ostensibly, Mr. Dorney believes that 60 review
period commenced with the September 4, 2001, submittal. We do not believe that Mr. Dorney's
approach to this certification is fair or consistent with good public policy or EMC rules. The
applicant has provided responses to DWQ staff inquiries within a week or less and has altered
the project plan (which included the removal of one subdivision lot , which in a 16 lot
development constitutes a significant loss of potential revenue). Mr. Dorney seems to believe
that every time he decides to ask for additional information, the regulatory clock is reset to zero.
This approach defeats the intent of a limited review period. Otherwise DWQ staff could review
indefinitely, simply continuing to request further information or demand further concessions in
order to earn approval. In fact, no information "necessary to the Director's decision" was asked
for or furnished after July 31, 2001. The subsequent submittals were responses to demands by
DWQ staff for additional concessions and did not supply "information necessary to the
Director's decision." Additional delay, potentially for up to 60 days, for a public hearing, to
which the requestors are not entitled by statute, is simply unconscionable under these facts.
Moreover, the issues raised by the persons requesting a public hearing are not relevant to your
decision. The requests consist of 28 identical forms, and seven individual letters, most of which
raise the following issues (the forms provide a useful summary):
1. compliance with the "new stormwater rules"
There is no application pending, or requirement, for a stormwater permit under either
15A NCAC 21-1.0126 or under 15A NCAC 2H.1000, for the Stonehaven project.
The Neuse Buffer Rules may be interpreted as a "stormwater" program, but the issue
with the Neuse Buffer rules is control of nutrient inputs to the Neuse River system. No
issue of nutrient inputs has been raised, nor is there any legitimate issue concerning
"stormwater" that is within your purview relative to the matters before you.
2. concern with increased sedimentation to affected streams
A sedimentation and erosion control plan may be required as development commences,
but that program is administered by the Wake County local sedimentation and erosion
control program. No application for such program is before the Division of Water
Quality, and thus, sedimentation issues are premature and irrelevant to the decision
before you.
3. increase in impervious surface and the effect such increase would have on flood potential
This issue is covered most directly by the subdivision, planning and zoning requirements
of the City of Raleigh. A Flood Study for the Stonehaven Subdivision using the HEC-2
model was prepared and submitted to the City of Raleigh pursuant to the City's zoning
requirements. The study was completed and sealed by a professional engineer on
October 22, 2001. The requestors have available to them the process available under the
City of Raleigh ordinances to investigate flooding issues and the related issue of
impervious surface coverage. Because the State Stormwater Program (15A NCAC 2H
1000) is not applicable to this project, these issues are not relevant to your decision
under the 401 Certification and Neuse Buffer Rules programs
4. effect of runoffon drinking water supply
The waters draining the project site are not water supply classified nor are they upstream
of any WS-class waters. While the 401 process is concerned with protection of water
quality, those concerns are limited to the standards applicable to the classification of the
streams impacted by the federal 404 permit and the standards of the downstream waters.
There are no drinking water issues that have any relevance to the decision before you.
Note that the applications before you on which you must make it decision are for Neuse Buffer
Rules approval and for 401 Certification. The concerns expressed in the requests for public
hearing relate to the City of Raleigh process, and perhaps to the approval of a sedimentation and
erosion control plan, but not to the 401 certification issues nor to the Neuse Buffer Rules
approval. The fact that members of the public have concerns, however legitimate, that do not
pertain to the matters before you should not justify a public hearing.
A public hearing held for the purpose of mollifying public uneasiness unrelated to the matters
relevant to your decision merely serve to exacerbate public frustration and distrust of
government, because, ultimately, the outcome 01` the hearing would have to be that the concerns
expressed have no impact on your decisions. There is no statutory provision pertaining to public
hearings for permits other than discharge permits, but it is instructive that for that program for
which hearings are specifically provided, the Director- may hold a public hearing if it is
determined that there is "significant public interest" expressed. "Significance" should be judged
not only on the number of requests (we do not believe that 35 requests, 28 of which are a form
parroting one person's view of the issues, are significant even in terms of numbers), but on
whether there are issues or concerns raised which have some connection to the pertinent
concerns of the Director in making his decision on the applications before him. The issues raised
here are irrelevant to those decisions. Moreover, the cost of a public hearing should also be
factored against the "significance" of the public interest, particularly when the larger public
interest may weigh against expending scarce resources on a matter of extremely localized, and
irrelevant, concerns. The cost to Stonehaven is obvious, as a public hearing at this late date
would cause considerable further delay-related expense. DWQ also would need to invest staff
time, resources and the cost of locating and advertising the hearing.
All of the issues raised by the concerned residents have been addressed by our engineer as a
result of the suggestions from the City of Raleigh Planning and Engineering department heads.
We have accommodated every item of concern in our working drawings that are presently in the
hands of the City.
Please be aware that we are not insensitive to our neighbors' concerns. If it would be helpful to
your decision, we would be glad to arrange or cooperate in a joint meeting with you or any of
your staff you wish to designate and with concerned citizens in the vicinity of the Stonehaven
Subdivision to address the issues and explain the design parameters of our project and the results
of the flood study, which appears to be of paramount importance. However, we are not willing
to accept further significant delay to our project, because we do not believe it is justified or
lawful.
Please let me know at your earliest convenience when I would be able to meet with you
concerning this matter.
Sincerely yours,
Bennett M. Keasler
RALEIGH 165088v1
W AT
?9pG
r
n •r
Z4? 1
CNJ
:V
Michael F. Easley
Governor
William G. Ross, Jr., Secretary
Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Gregory J. Thorpe, Ph.D., Acting Director
Division of Water Quality

? 0 12-6 ?6 /
?.. VJ
\\? \ V I r
measures at very specific locations on the site. ?.? ?.,N., ..._
information, which was forwarded to the DWO Raleigh Regional Office. Mr. Mitchell trim l
401 Certification and Neuse Buffer Rules Approval based upon the revised site plan.
Since then, we have been contacted by downstream and adjacent property owners, who have expressed their
concerns with the proposed new Stonehaven Subdivision. Their primary concerns appear to be turbidity, sedimentation
and flooding downstream, as well as the potential destabilization of Hare Snipe Creek from increased flow. To date, we
have received 35 letters from individuals requesting a Public Hearing for this project.
In the interest of obtaining full public input on this project, Steve Mitchell, Cyndi Karoly and I recommend that we
hold a Public Hearing. Please review the file materials and advise me of your decision as to whether or not a hearing
should be held. All of the correspondence referenced in this memorandum is included to aid in your review. Please note
that we must provide a response to the applicant by November 2, 2001.
Thank you for your attention. Please call Cyndi Karoly at [phone] if you have any questions.
Cc: John Dorney (cover memo only)
Coleen Sullins (cover memo only)
Dennis Ramsey (cover memo only)
Steve Mitchell, RRO, (cover memo only)
Ken Schuster (cover memo only)
stonehaven
t? North Carolina Division of Water Quality, 401 Wetlands Certification Unit,
1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1650 (Mailing Address)
2321 Crabtree Blvd., Raleigh, NC 27604-2260 (Location)
'? n4n 700 47on ?.. L..... ".\ non -,3 aonO is-i L. N...//ti0". ".r.r..b.". ..,.... /.......".H"....?..?
68LI-w-66-969aol ldwoea uanlaa o!lsewo0 6661 AInf ' [ [$£ wao=l S.
C? d7?7oz, fez
(legel aopues wal fdoo) aegwnN 810!IJV
SO), ? (aad eJlx3) L/Jen!!e0 pelo!alsea •y
.G.0.00 IpIN peansu! ?
as!puegojayq jol ld!eoea wnlea ? peiels!6ea ?
!!eyv sseadx3 ? PUN PaWlJe0 ?
ad(1eo!naeS •E
ON ?
sek ?
aesseappy ?
lue6y ?
4e0 10 WO ' (APeelD luud e
i?-9,9v /0
pyr ?t17?'ilJ 07l
L
:ol pessejppv a!o!pv • I
y -sllwaed eoeds 11 luo.il eyl uo ao
7
'pealsep sl iGengeQ pelaulsed;I q WO;!
:mo!eq sselppe tien!!ep ?elue 'S3.1 11
L l wel! wwl lueaeg!p ssaJppe AJen!!ep s! •0
'aosldpew ayl 10 ?loeq syl of paeo slyl 4oe13`d ¦
.? •no?( of paeo ayl uanlaa ueo am leyl os
asaanea ay} uo sseappe pue euleu anon( lulad ¦
•y alaldiuoo ositJ '£ Pue 'Z ' G swell eleldwoo ¦
? 2131N30 S3?1?2i3SN HJI3lb?1 IIVV4 0991
An WV/SaNVI13M - OMO
M3a ON
. xoq siLp ui b+dlz pue `ssaippe `aweu anon( luud aseald :japuas .
0 L-O 'oN llwaad
SdSn
pled S90 J +8 9bels0d
!leyq sselo-isal3
3OIn83S lVlsOd S31ViS 4311Nn
[Fwd: [Fwd: Stronehaven Subdivision1)
e `
Subject: [Fwd: [Fwd: Stronehaven Subdivision]]
Date: Mon, 29 Oct 200108:05:38 -0500
From: Coleen Sullins <[e-mail]>
Organization: NC DENR DWQ
To: "cyndi.karoly" <[e-mail]>
Cyndi - do you know anything about this project? Coleen
Subject: [Fwd: Stronehaven Subdivision]
Date: Sun, 28 Oct 200121:34:21 -0500
From: Greg Thorpe <[e-mail]>
To: Coleen Sullins <[e-mail]>
Coleen,
Please have someone call this gentleman. I will be in DOT meetings
(mitigation workshop) all day tomorrow and Tuesday (as will Mr.
Dorney). Thanks!
Subject: Stronehaven Subdivision
Date: Sun, 28 Oct 2001 19:53:56 -0500
From: "Bennett Keasler" <[e-mail]>
To: <[e-mail]>
CC: <[e-mail]>
Dr. Thorpe,
Please read my attached letter at your earliest moment. I would appreciate a response as soon
as possible.
My office phone is 870-1262 and my office e-mail is [e-mail]
Thank you for your time.
Name: Greg Thorpe Letter.doc
Greg Thome Letter.doc Type: Microsoft Word Document (application/msword)
Encoding: base64
Download Status: Not downloaded with message
1 of 1 10/29/019:41 AN
Gregory J. Thorpe, Ph.D.
Acting Director, Division of Water Quality
Department of Environment and Natural Resources
512 North Salisbury Street
Raleigh, North Carolina 27604-1148
RE: Stonehaven Subdivision
Dear Dr. Thorpe:
You received recently a memorandum dated October 26, 2001, from John Dorney, and a package
of letters requesting a public hearing. As the managing member of Stonehaven\North Raleigh,
LLC., the group seeking the permits to proceed with that project, I am requesting that you
decline to grant the requests for public hearing and instruct Mr. Dorney to issue the 401
Certifications and Neuse Buffer Rules approval. I would appreciate an opportunity to meet with
you regarding this matter at your earliest convenience, preferably on Monday, October 29, 2001.
Mr. Dorney's memorandum provides a chronology for your consideration. We have a slightly
different view of the events detailed by Mr. Dorney.
May 29, 2001 - application submitted to 401/Wetlands Unit
July 10, 2001 - "on-hold" letter issued [42 days after application submittal]
July 11, 2001 - response to "on-hold" inquiries
July 31, 2001 - supplemental information submitted pertinent to "on-hold" inquiries
August 15, 2001 - notification to applicant of recommendation to deny request for minor
variance to Neuse Buffer rules [assuming the information requested was fully submitted on July
31, 2001, 57 days of review time elapsed since application submittal. Assuming the response
was complete on July 11, 77 review days had elapsed]
August 21, 2001 - revised plans submitted to address DWQ concerns
August 28, 2001 - "on-hold" letter issued [assuming that the August 15 notification constituted
an "on-hold" letter, either 64 or 84 days of review time elapsed since application submittal. If
the August 15 letter was not an "on-hold" letter, which it did not purport on its face to be, then
either 70 or 90 review days had elapsed]
September 4, 2001 - additional supporting information submitted to DWQ; RRO recommends
issuance of 401 certification and Neuse Buffer Rules Approval.
October 2, 2001 - first of a series of 35 letters from concerned citizens is received by DWQ;
additional letters are received on October 5, 9, 10 and 11, and a package of form letters dated
October 10 are included in the October 26 memorandum; the October 10 forms have no date
stamp indicating when they were received by DWQ [As of October 2, an additional 28 days
review days have passed, for a total of as few as 92 or as many as 118 review days which had
elapsed. The requests for public hearing occurred after the recommendation for issuance by Mr.
Mitchell of the RRO]
Mr. Dorney offers November 2, 2001, as the date by which EMC rules require final action by the
Director of the Division of Water Quality. Ostensibly, Mr. Dorney believes that 60 review
period commenced with the September 4, 2001, submittal. We do not believe that Mr. Dorney's
approach to this certification is fair or consistent with good public policy or EMC rules. The
applicant has provided responses to DWQ staff inquiries within a week or less and has altered
the project plan (which included the removal of one subdivision lot, which in a 16 lot
development constitutes a significant loss of potential revenue). Mr. Dorney seems to believe
that every time he decides to ask for additional information, the regulatory clock is reset to zero.
This approach defeats the intent of a limited review period. Otherwise DWQ staff could review
indefinitely, simply continuing to request further information or demand further concessions in
order to earn approval. In fact, no information "necessary to the Director's decision" was asked
for or furnished after July 31, 2001. The subsequent submittals were responses to demands by
DWQ staff for additional concessions and did not supply "information necessary to the
Director's decision." Additional delay, potentially for up to 60 days, for a public hearing, to
which the requestors are not entitled by statute, is simply unconscionable under these facts.
Moreover, the issues raised by the persons requesting a public hearing are not relevant to your
decision. The requests consist of 28 identical forms, and seven individual letters, most of which
raise the following issues (the forms provide a useful summary):
1. compliance with the "new stormwater rules"
There is no application pending, or requirement, for a stormwater permit under either
15A NCAC 2H .0126 or under 15A NCAC 2H .1000, for the Stonehaven project.
The Neuse Buffer Rules may be interpreted as a "stormwater" program, but the issue
with the Neuse Buffer rules is control of nutrient inputs to the Neuse River system. No
issue of nutrient inputs has been raised, nor is there any legitimate issue concerning
"stormwater" that is within your purview relative to the matters before you.
2. concern with increased sedimentation to affected streams
A sedimentation and erosion control plan may be required as development commences,
but that program is administered by the Wake County local sedimentation and erosion
control program. No application for such program is before the Division of Water
Quality, and thus, sedimentation issues are premature and irrelevant to the decision
before you.
3. increase in impervious surface and the effect such increase would have on flood potential
This issue is covered most directly by the subdivision, planning and zoning requirements
of the City of Raleigh. A Flood Study for the Stonehaven Subdivision using the HEC-2
model was prepared and submitted to the City of Raleigh pursuant to the City's zoning
requirements. The study was completed and sealed by a professional engineer on
October 22, 2001. The requestors have available to them the process available under the
City of Raleigh ordinances to investigate flooding issues and the related issue of
impervious surface coverage. Because the State Stormwater Program (15A NCAC 2H
.1000) is not applicable to this project, these issues are not relevant to your decision
under the 401 Certification and Neuse Buffer Rules programs
4. effect of runoff on drinking water supply
The waters draining the project site are not water supply classified nor are they upstream
of any WS-class waters. While the 401 process is concerned with protection of water
quality, those concerns are limited to the standards applicable to the classification of the
streams impacted by the federal 404 permit and the standards of the downstream waters.
There are no drinking water issues that have any relevance to the decision before you.
Note that the applications before you on which you must make a decision are for Neuse Buffer
Rules approval and for 401 Certification. The concerns expressed in the requests for public
hearing relate to the City of Raleigh process, and perhaps to the approval of a sedimentation and
erosion control plan, but not to the 401 certification issues nor to the Neuse Buffer Rules
approval. The fact that members of the public have concerns, however legitimate, that do not
pertain to the matters before you should not justify a public hearing.
A public hearing held for the purpose of mollifying public uneasiness unrelated to the matters
relevant to your decision merely serve to exacerbate public frustration and distrust of
government, because, ultimately, the outcome of the hearing would have to be that the concerns
expressed have no impact on your decisions. There is no statutory provision pertaining to public
hearings for permits other than discharge permits, but it is instructive that for that program for
which hearings are specifically provided, the Director may hold a public hearing if it is
determined that there is "significant public interest" expressed. "Significance" should be judged
not only on the number of requests (we do not believe that 35 requests, 28 of which are a form
parroting one person's view of the issues, are significant even in terms of numbers), but on
whether there are issues or concerns raised which have some connection to the pertinent
concerns of the Director in making his decision on the applications before him. The issues raised
here are irrelevant to those decisions. Moreover, the cost of a public hearing should also be
factored against the "significance" of the public interest, particularly when the larger public
interest may weigh against expending scarce resources on a matter of extremely localized, and
irrelevant, concerns. The cost to Stonehaven is obvious, as a public hearing at this late date
would cause considerable further delay-related expense, DWQ also would need to invest staff
time, resources and the cost of locating and advertising the hearing.
All of the issues raised by the concerned residents have been addressed by our engineer as a
result of the suggestions from the City of Raleigh Planning and Engineering department heads.
We have accommodated every item of concern in our working drawings that are presently in the
hands of the City.
Please be aware that we are not insensitive to our neighbors' concerns. If it would be helpful to
your decision, we would be glad to arrange or cooperate in a joint meeting with you or any of
your staff you wish to designate and with concerned citizens in the vicinity of the Stonehaven
Subdivision to address the issues and explain the design parameters of our project and the results
of the flood study, which appears to be of paramount importance. However, we are not willing
to accept further significant delay to our project, because we do not believe it is justified or
lawful.
Please let me know at your earliest convenience when I would be able to meet with you
concerning this matter.
Sincerely yours,
Bennett M. Keasler
RALF,IGH 1650880
o?0F W A TFRpG Michael F. Easley
Governor
William G. Ross, Jr., Secretary
Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Gregory J. Thorpe, Ph.D., Acting Director
Division of Water Quality
Cl)
October 213, 2001
MEMORANDUM
TO: Greg Thorpe
Acting Director
FROM: John Dorney
Supervisor, 401/Wetlands Unit
RE: Request for Public Hearing Decision for Stonehaven Subdivision, Wake County,
DWQ Project No. 01-0833
Enclosed are your copies of application materials for a request for a 401 Water Quality Certification for the
proposed Stonehaven Subdivision in Wake County. The Prescott Company, LLC, first submitted an application to the
401/Wetlands Unit on May 29, 2001. The 404 Permits required for this project will include Nationwide Permits 12 (Utility
Line Backfill), 25 (Structural Discharge) and 39 (Residential, Commercial and Institutional Developments). As currently
designed, this project will also require an Approval of the Neuse Buffer Rules, although the original design would have
required a Minor Variance.
This application was forwarded to the Raleigh Regional Office in June 2001, and was also reviewed by Mr. Bob
Zarzecki in the Central Office. Following his field review, Mr. Steve Mitchell recommended that the applicant provide
explicit details of impacts, justification for any unavoidable impacts and redesign aspects of the project to minimize
wetland and buffer impacts. Mr. Mitchell's and Mr. Zarzecki's recommendations were included in an On-Hold letter
forwarded to the applicant from the Central Office on July 10, 2001. On July 11 and July 31, 2001, the applicant provided
responses to our July 10, 2001 letter.
On August 15, 2001, we notified the applicant of our intent to recommend denial of their request for a Minor
Variance to the Neuse Buffer Rules, citing a lack of evidence that buffer impacts had been minimized. On August 21,
2001, the Prescott Company responded with plan revisions which they claimed would illustrate project details and
reduced wetland and buffer impacts.
On August 28, 2001, we forwarded a third On-Hold letter to the applicant, requesting details of avoidance
measures at very specific locations on the site. On September 4, 2001, the applicant provided additional supporting
information, which was forwarded to the DWQ Raleigh Regional Office. Mr. Mitchell then recommended issuance of the
401 Certification and Neuse Buffer Rules Approval based upon the revised site plan.
Since then, we have been contacted by downstream and adjacent property owners, who have expressed their
concerns with the proposed new Stonehaven Subdivision. Their primary concerns appear to be turbidity, sedimentation
and flooding downstream, as well as the potential destabilization of Hare Snipe Creek from increased flow. To date, we
have received 35 letters from individuals requesting a Public Hearing for this project.
In the interest of obtaining full public input on this project, Steve Mitchell, Cyndi Karoly and I recommend that we
hold a Public Hearing. Please review the file materials and advise me of your decision as to whether or not a hearing
should be held. All of the correspondence referenced in this memorandum is included to aid in your review. Please note
that we must provide a response to the applicant by November 2, 2001.
Thank you for your attention. Please call Cyndi Karoly at [phone] if you have any questions.
Cc: John Dorney (cover memo only)
Coleen Sullins (cover memo only)
Dennis Ramsey (cover memo only)
Steve Mitchell, RRO, (cover memo only)
Ken Schuster (cover memo only)
stonehaven
North Carolina Division of Water Quality, 401 Wetlands Certification Unit,
1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1650 (Mailing Address)
2321 Crabtree Blvd., Raleigh, NC 27604-2260 (Location)
non inn 4- Oo /_. ---% nin -'nn cone 1$-A ?.w... rn.n.........-,........ i.....e...?i.... a..i
Aw Z J iJU
October 02, 2001
NCDENR
Mr. John Dorney
Wetland Scientist
2321 Crabtree Blvd.
Raleigh, NC 27604
Project # 010833
Dear Mr. Dorney,
Lucy Ringland and I appreciate the time to review the Stone Haven file at your office. We do not
oppose this development, per se, but are very concerned about a few critical issues, which we
would like addressed by either your department or the developer. The primary issues are as
follows:
1. We are concerned that the development be kept within the new storm water rules in regards to
run off and water quality.
2. We are concerned that the development on lots 1 and 2 will cause a significant amount of soil
into the creek, since these lots currently provide the main run off conduit for Parklynn subdivision.
3. We are concerned about the amount of impervious surface this development would create and
ask about the need for some sort of pond to hold the run off
4. We, and the adjacent land owners, would like to request a formal public hearing to be held to
answer the public concerns.
We thank you in advance for you input and consideration in these issues. Please contact us if you
need any further information or clarification on our concerns.
Sincerely,
Alice Lutz Lucy Ringland
8305 Druids Lane 3200 Ringland Road
Raleigh, NC 27613 Raleigh, NC 27613
870-8456 676-4499
3020 Dunkirk Drive
Raleigh, NC 27613
Oct. 9, 2001 1u; v
Dear Mr. Dorney:
Although "Stonehaven" subdivision will not be built directly adjacent to my property, I
find that it is AMAZING that the city would allow buiding in what clearly is a FLOOD
PLAIN! Pros e:f- P© l d Ff 3 3
Will the buyers of these homes be made aware of the fact that during Hurricane Fran, my
backyard flooded to the level almost equal to the floor of my elevated ( 8 1/2 ft) back
porch?
I realize that this was a rare occurance, but it CAN and DID happen, and I feel that to
conceal such information to potential buyers is deceptive, and just plain WRONG!
Does this area REALLY NEED another 16 (+/-) homes squeezed into an area that is not
really meant to be built on?
Sincerely,
Charlene & Tim Rafferty
[phone]
IQOZ
October 7, 2001
NCDENR
Mr. John Dorney
Wetland Scientist
2321 Crabtree Blvd.
Raleigh, NC 27604
Project # 010833
Dear Mr. Dorney,
My husband and I are concerned about the Stone Haven subdivision being developed and
would like to address a public hearing. In particular, we are concerned about:
flooding to adjacent landowners, pollution to water supply, and storm drainage issues.
Thank you for your help.

Brian and Betsy Bennett
3005 Dunkirk Drive
Raleigh, NC 27613
(919)-870-1294
October 8, 2001
NCDENR
Mr. John Domey
Wetland Scientist
2321 Crabtree Blvd. 1V?
Raleigh, NC 27604
Project # 010833
Dear Mr. Dorney,
I am a Stonehenge subdivision homeowner and am writing with concerns over the proposed development
of the Stone Haven neighborhood. This property is behind my home at 8313 Druids Lane. As I
understand, some of this property will be developed with 16 homes. The creek that runs through this
property currently flows over its bank and floods part of the woods during heavy rainfall. My daughters
have built a bridge over the creek on the property currently owned by the Edwards family on Druids Lane.
The bridge stands three feet above the creek level, yet every heavy rainfall washes away the bridge. During
the years we experienced the hurricanes, the flooding and standing water was visible from my home.
With this area already very wet and disposed to flooding, I am concerned that more development in this
area will increase pollution to the Falls water shed from the runoff. Would it be possible to get information
on the new storm water drainage rules and regulations in relation to this development?
With the flooding and pollution issues being raised, please consider this a request for a public hearing to
help resolve these issues and questions.
Thank you for your assistance and support.
' .nRAMtch,o'-
Jane Bouchon
83 l3 Druids Lane
Raleigh, NC 27616
919-848-3135
NCDENR
Mr. John Dorney
Wetland Scientist
2321 Crabtree Blvd.
Raleigh, NC 27604
Project # 010833
Dear Mr. Dorney,
om- ! 1 AI'I1
We are concerned about the Stone Haven subdivision being developed and would
like to address a public hearing. In particular, we are concerned about:
flooding to adjacent landowners, pollution to water supply, and storm
drainage issues.
Thank you for your assistance.
Sincerely,
Edward and Joyce Ungemach
3008 Dunkirk Drive
Raleigh, NC 27613
Wednesday, October 03, 2001
Mr. John Dorney
NCDENR
Wetland Scientist
2321 Crabtree Blvd.
Raleigh, NC 27604
Re: Project # 010833
Dear Mr. Dorney,
1I.."' S 1;JO
I am writing to express my concern about the Stone Haven project proposed adjacent to
our Stonehenge subdivision. We do not oppose this development, however, we are
concerned that it be developed in an environmentally sound manner. In particular, we
are concerned about how the project relates to the Neuse River basin, and the potential
impact upon our water supply. 1 request that a formal, public hearing be held to address
these concerns.
Thank you for your consideration of these issues. Please feel free to contact us if you
need additional information or clarification of our concerns.
Sincerely,
c?
rnthia A. Ed s4, Ph.
8317 Druids Lane
Raleigh, NC 27613
[phone]
[e-mail]
October 10, 2001
NCDENR
Cindy Karoly
2321 Crabtree Blvd
Raleigh, NC 27604
Project # 010833
Dear Ms. Karoly,
We arc writing to voice c?
your office. We do not o
which we would like adc
1. We arc concerned tl _Zl?
quality. These two si j
subdivisions (well o,
affected creeks as do
and the effect more 1 \
2. V ti-
c(
c l,
3. W e?? c t •. S?t-vr.e?^cuen dc?.rea.e.'
ha
csl
str S
nc(
pol
4. We
cor
Wethar C_ (O%y-O"1"1iS
(919-67
concern,
Sincerely,
UA,1 rv-
1T/ yo /-?" eA A-'m,4 ???
his area
;ularly
these two
there is
lount of
hcse
gland
about our
October 10, 2001
NCDENR
Cindy Karoly
2321 Crabtree Blvd.
Raleigh, NC 27604
Project # 010833
Dear Ms. Karoly,
We are writing to voice our concerns about the Stonchaven subdivision, which is currently under review by
your office. We do not oppose this development, per se, but are very concerned about a few critical issues,
which we would like addressed by either your department or the developer. Our primary issues are:
1. We are concerned that the development follow the new stormwater rules in regards to runoff and water
duality. These two streams contain the runoff for a large portion of the Stonehenge and Parklyn
subdivisions (well over 100 acres of land). We have noticed more and more particulate buildup in the
affected creeks as development has occurred upstream, and are concerned for the purity of the water
and the effect more building will have on Lake Lynn and the Neuse River Basin.
2. We are concerned that development on lots 1 through 4 will have significant sedimentary impact on
the more northerly creek, since these lots, especially lots I and 2, currently provide the train runoff
conduit for the Parklyn subdivision. When Parklyn was built, mud and water frequently covered
Kncbworlh Court and washed downhill into the stream. This damaged adjoining property and the
environmental impact is still apparent.
3. We are concerned about the amount of impervious surface this development would create. This area
has been seriously flooded on two occasions (Hurricanes Fran and Floyd) and the streams regularly
escape their banks during even minor rain events. The amount and speed of the water flow in these two
streams has significantly increased in the last several years. We are wondering about whether there is
need for some sort of holding pond or filtering facility to control the runoff and reduce the amount of
potential flooding on this property.
4. We, and other area landowners, request that a formal public hearing be scheduled to address these
concerns.
We thank you in advance for your input and consideration in these issues. Please contact Lucy Ringland
(919-676-4459) or Alice Lutz (919-870-8456) if you need any further information or clarification about our
concerns.
Sincerely,
Y l?
u00
?Q??z
October 10, 2001
NCDENR
Cindy Karoly
2321 Crabtree Blvd.
Raleigh, NC 27604
Project # 010833
Dcar Ms. Karoly,
We are writing to voice our concerns about the Slonehaven subdivision, which is currently under review by
your office. We do not oppose this development, per se, but are very concerned about a few critical issues,
which we would like addressed by either your department or the developer. Our primary issues are:
1. We are concerned that the development follow the new stormwater rules in regards to runoff and water
quality. These two streams contain the runoff for a large portion of the Stonehenge and Parklyn
subdivisions (well over 100 acres of land). We have noticed more and more particulate buildup in the
affected creeks as development has occurred upstream, and are concerned for the purity of the water
and the effect more building will have on Lake Lynn and the Neusc River Basin.
2. We arc concerned that development on lots 1 through 4 will have significant sedimentary impact on
the more northerly creek, since these lots, especially lots 1 and 2, currently provide the main runoff
conduit for the Parklyn subdivision. When Parklyn was built, mud and water frequently covered
Knebworth Court and washed downhill into the stream. This damaged adjoining property and the
environmental impact is still apparent.
3. We are concerned about the amount of impervious surface this development would create. This area
has been seriously flooded on two occasions (Hurricanes Fran and Floyd) and the streams regularly
escape their banks during even Honor rain events. The amount and speed of the water (low in these two
streams has significantly increased in the last several years. We arc wondering about whether there is
need for some sort of holding pond or filtering facility to control the runoff and reduce the amount of
potential flooding on this property.
4. We, and other area landowners, request that a formal public hearing be scheduled to address these
concerns.
We thank you in advance for your input and consideration in these issues. Please contact Lucy Ringland
(919-676-4459) or Alice Lutz (919-870-8456) if you need any further information or clarification about our
concerns.
Sincerely,
f-
??V G - 9'00 3
October 10, 2001
NCDENR
Cindy Karoly
2321 Crabtree Blvd.
Raleigh, NC 27604
Project # 010833
Dcar Ms. Karoly,
We arc writing to voice our concerns about the Stonchaven subdivision, which is currently under review by
your office. We do not oppose this development, per se, but are very concerned about a few critical issues,
which we would like addressed by either your department or the developer. Our primary issues are:
I . We are concerned that the development follow the new stormwatcr n?lcs in regards to runoff and water
quality. These two streams contain the runoff fora large portion of the Stonehenge and Parklyn
subdivisions (well over 100 acres of land). We have noticed more and more particulate buildup in the
affected creeks as development has occurred upstream, and are concerned for the purity of the water
and the effect more building will have on Lake Lynn and the Neusc River Basin.
2. We are concerned that development o?? lots I through 4 will have significant sedimentary impact on
the more northerly creek, since these lots, especially lots 1 and 2, currently provide the main runoff
conduit for the Parklyn subdivision. When Parklyn was built, nrud and water frequently covered
Knebworth Court and washed downhill into the stream. This damaged adjoining property and the
environmental impact is still apparent.
3. We arc concerned about the amount of impervious surface (his development would create. This area
has been seriously flooded on two occasions (Hurricanes Fran and Floyd) and the streams regularly
escape their banks during even minor rain events. The amount and speed of the water flow in these two
streams has significantly increased in the last several years. We are wondering about whether there is
need for some sort of holding pond or filtering facility to control the nmoff and reduce the amount of
potential flooding on this property
4. We, and other area landowners, request that a formal public hearing be scheduled to address these
concerns.
We thank you in advance for your input and consideration in these issues. Please contact Lucy Ringland
(919-676-4459) or Alice Lutz (919-870-8456) if you need any further information or clarification about our
concerns.
Sincerely,
0 \`(o N*-6 LU C2,N CD
October 10, 2001
NCDENR
Cindy Karoly
2321 Crabtree Blvd.
Raleigh, NC 27604
Project # 010833
Dear Ms. Karoly,
We arc writing to voice our concerns about (lie Stonehaven subdivision, which is currently under review by
your office. We do not oppose this development, per se, but are very concerned about a few critical issues,
which we would like addressed by either your department or the developer. Our primary issues arc:
1. We are concerned that the development follow the new stormwatcr riles in regards to runoff and water
quality. These two streams contain the runoff for a large portion of the Stonehenge and Parklyn
subdivisions (well over 100 acres of land). We have noticed more and more particulate buildup in the
affected creeks as development has occurred upstrcwn, and arc concerned for the purity of the water
and the effect more building will have on Lake Lynn and the Neuse River Basin.
2. We arc concerned that development on lots 1 through 4 will have significant sedimentary impact on
the more northerly creek, since these lots, especially lots I and 2, currently provide the main nmoff
conduit for the Parklyn subdivision. When Parklyn was built, mud and water frequently covered
Knebworth Court and washed downhill into the stream. This d:unaged adjoining property and the
environmental impact is still apparent.
3. We are concerned about the amount of impervious surface this development would create. This area
has been seriously flooded on two occasions (Hurricanes Fran and Floyd) and the streams regularly
escape their banks during even minor rain events. The amount and speed of the water flow in these two
streams has significantly increased in the last several years. We arc wondering about whether there is
need for some sort of holding pond or filtering facility to control the runoff and reduce the amount of
potential flooding on this property.
4. We, and other adjacent landowners, request that a formal public hearing be scheduled to address these
concerns.
We thank you in advance for your input and consideration in these issues. Please contact Lucy Ringland
(919-676-4459) or Alice Lutz (919-870-8456) if you recd any further information or clarification about our
concerns.
Sincerely,
Lai('iA-Z7???
?o ? %Y-q6l?
October 10, 2001
NCDENR
Cindy Karoly
2321 Crabtree Blvd.
Raleigh, NC 27604
Project # 010833
Dear Ms. Karoly,
We are writing to voice our concerns about (he Stonehaven subdivision, which is currently under review by
your office. We do not oppose this development, per se, but are very concenicd about it few critical issues,
which we would like addressed by either your department or the developer. Our primary issues are:
1. We are concerned that the development follow (lie new storniwater rules in regards to runoff and water
quality. These two streams contain the runoff for a large portion of the Stonehenge and Parklyn
subdivisions (well over 100 acres of land). We have noticed more and more particulate buildup in the
affected creeks as development has occurred upstream, and arc concerned for the purity of the water
and the effect more building will have on Lake Lynn and the Ncuse River Basin.
2. We are concerned that development on lots I through 4 will have significant sedimentary impact on
the more northerly creek, since these lots, especially lots 1 and 2, currently provide the main runoff
conduit for the Parklyn subdivision. When Parklyn was built, amid and water frequently covered
Kncbworth Court and washed downhill into the stream. This damaged adjoining property and the
environmental impact is still apparent.
3. We are concemcd about the amount of impervious surface this development would create. This area
has been seriously flooded on two occasions (Hurricanes Fran and Floyd) and the streams regularly
escape their batiks during even minor rain events. The amount and speed of the water flow in these two
streams has significantly increased in the last several years. We arc wondering about whether there is
need for some sort of holding pond or filtering facility to control the runoff and reduce the aniount of
potential flooding on this property.
4. We, and other adjacent landowners, request that a formal public hearing be scheduled to address these
concerns.
We thank you in advance for your input and consideration in these issues. Please contact Lucy Ringland
(919-6764459) or Alice Lutz (919-870-8456) if you need any further infortnation or clarification about our
concerns.
Sincerely,
ZL -7U
October 10, 2001
NCDENR
Cindy Karoly
2321 Crabtree Blvd.
Raleigh, NC 27604
Project # 010833
Dear Ms. Karoly,
We are writing to voice our concerns about the Stonchaven subdivision, which is currently under review by
your office. We do not oppose this development, per se, but arc very concerned about a few critical issues,
which we would like addressed by cillier your department or the developer. Our primary issues are:
1. We are concerned that the development follow the new stornnvater riles in regards to runoff and water
duality. These two streams contain the nmoff for a large portion of the Stonclienge and Parklyn
subdivisions (well over 100 acres of land). We have noticed more and more particulate buildup in the
affected creeks as development has occurred upstream, and are concerned for the purity of the water
and the effect more building will have on Lake Lynn and the Neuse River Basin.
2. We are concerned that development on lots l through 4 will have significant sedimentary impact on
the more northerly creek, since these lots, especially lots I and 2, currently provide the main runoff
conduit for the Parklyn subdivision. When Parklyn was built, mud and water frequently covered
Knebworth Court and washed downhill into (lie stream. This damaged adjoining properly and the
environmental impact is still apparent.
3. We are concerned about the amount of impervious surface this development would create. This area
has been seriously flooded on two occasions (Hurricanes Fran and Floyd) and (tic streams regularly
escape their banks during even minor rain events. The amount and speed of the water flow in these two
streams has significantly increased in (lie last several years. We arc wondering about whether there is
need for some sort of holding pond or filtering facility to control the runoff and reduce (lie amount of
potential flooding on this property.
4. We, and other adjacent landowners, request that a formal public hearing be scheduled to address these
concerns.
We thank you in advance for your input and consideration in these issues. Please contact Lucy Ringland
(919-676-4459) or Alice Lutz (919-870-8456) if you need any further information or clarification about our
concerns.
October 10, 2001
NCDENR
Cindy Karoly
2321 Crabtree Blvd.
Raleigh, NC 27604
Project # 010833
Dear Ms. Karoly,
We are writing to voice our concerns about the Stonchaven subdivision, which is currently under review by
your office. We do not oppose this dcvelopment, per se, but are very concerned about a few critical issues,
which we would like addressed by either your department or the developer. Our primary issues arc:
1. We are concerned that the development follow the new slormwater rules in regards to runoff and water
quality. These two streams contain the runoff for a large portion of (lie Stonehenge and Parklyn
subdivisions (well over 100 acres of land). We have noticed more and more particulate buildup in the
affected creeks as development has occurred upstrei?m, and are concerned for (lie purity of the water
and the effect more building will have on Lake Lynn and the NCUsc River Basin.
2. We are concerned that development on lots 1 through 4 will have significant sedimentary impact on
the more northerly creek, since these lots, especially lots I and 2, currently provide the main runoff
conduit for the Parklyn subdivision. Whcn Parklyn was built, mud and water frequently covered
Kncbworth Court and washed downhill into the stream. This damaged adjoining property and the
environmental impact is still apparent.
3. We are concerned about (lie amount of impervious surface this development would create. This area
has been seriously flooded on two occasions (Hurricanes Fran and Floyd) and the streams regularly
escape their banks during even minor rain events. The amount and speed of the water flow in these two
streams has significantly increased in (lie last several years. We are wondering about whether there is
need for some sort of holding pond or filtering facility to control the nmoff and reduce the amount of
potential flooding on this property.
4. We, and other adjacent landowners, request that a formal public hearing be scheduled to address these
concerns.
We thank you in advance for your input and consideration in these issues. Please contact Lucy Ringland
(919-676-4459) or Alice Lutz (919-870-8456) if you need any further information or clarification about our
concerns.
Sincerely,

October 10, 2001
NCDENR
Cindy Karoly
2321 Crabtree Blvd.
Raleigh, NC 27604
Project # 010833
Dear Ms. Karoly,
We are writing to voice our concerns about the Stonchaven subdivision, which is currently under review by
your office. We do not oppose this development, per se, but arc very concerned about a few critical issues,
which we would like addressed by either your department or (lie developer. Our primary issues are:
1. We are concerned that the development follow the new stornnvater rules in regards to ninoff and water
quality. These two streams contain the runoff for a large portion of the Stonehenge and Parklyn
subdivisions (well over 100 acres of land). We have noticed more and more particulate buildup in the
affected creeks as development has occurred upstream, and are concerned for the purity of the water
and the effect more building will have on Lake Lynn and the Neuse River Basin.
2. We are concerned that development on lots 1 through 4 will have significant sedimentary impact on
the more northerly creek, since these lots, especially lots 1 and 2, currently provide the main runoff
conduit for the Parklyn subdivision. When Parklyn was built, mud and water frequently covered
Kncbworth Court and washed downhill into the stream. This damaged adjoining properly and the
environmental impact is still apparent.
3. We arc concerned about the amount of impervious surface this development would create. This area
has been seriously flooded on two occasions (Hurricanes Fran and Floyd) and the streams regularly
escape their banks during even minor rain events. The amount and speed of the water flow in these two
streams has significantly increased in the last several years. We are wondering about whether there is
need for some sort of holding pond or filtering facility to control the runoff and reduce the amount of
potential flooding on this property.
4. We, and other adjacent landowners, request that a formal public hearing be scheduled to address these
concerns.
We thank you in advance for your input and consideration in these issues. Please contact Lucy Ringland
(919-6764459) or Alice Lutz (919-870-8456) if you need any further information or clarification about our
concerns.
Sincerely,
? o vim. +- ?a•+?.w. tar, Q
- r??????Ce.Oc
:sz-pp
'L1 b is
October 10, 2001
NCDENR
Cindy Karoly
2321 Crabtree Blvd.
Raleigh, NC 27604
Project # 010833
Dear Ms. Karoly,
We arc writing to voice our concerns about the Stonehaven subdivision, which is currently under review by
your office. We do not oppose this development, per se, but are very concerned about a few critical issues,
which we would like addressed by either your department or the developer. Our primary issues are:
1. We are concerned that the development follow the new stormwater rules in regards to runoff and water
quality. These two streams contain the runoff for a large portion of the Stonehenge and Parklyn
subdivisions (well over 100 acres of land). We have noticed more and more particulate buildup in the
affected creeks as development has occurred upstream, and are concerned for the purity of the water
and the effect more building will have on Lake Lynn and the Neuse River Basin.
2. We are concerned that development on lots 1 through 4 will have significant sedimentary impact on
the more northerly creek, since these lots, especially lots 1 and 2, currently provide the main runoff
conduit for the Parklyn subdivision. When Parklyn was built, mud and water frequently covered
Knebworth Court and washed downhill into the stream. This damaged adjoining property and the
environmental impact is still apparent.
3. We are concerned about the amount of impervious surface this development would create. This area
has been seriously flooded on two occasions (Hurricanes Fran and Floyd) and the streams regularly
escape their banks during even minor rain events. The amount and speed of the water flow in these two
streams has significantly increased in the last several years. We are wondering about whether there is
need for some sort of holding pond or filtering facility to control the runoff and reduce the amount of
potential flooding on this property.
4. We, and other area landowners, request that a formal public hearing be scheduled to address these
concerns.
We thank you in advance for your input and consideration in these issues. Please contact Lucy Ringland
(919-676-4459) or Alice Lutz (919-870-8456) if you need any further information or clarification about our
concerns.
Sincerely,
?vS VEVWN,4 OL .

October 10, 2001
NCDENR
Cindy Karoly
2321 Crabtree Blvd.
Raleigh, NC 27604
Project # 010833
Dear Ms. Karoly,
We are writing to voice our concerns about the Stonehaven subdivision, which is currently under review by
your office. We do not oppose this development, per se, but are very concerned about a few critical issues,
which we would like addressed by either your department or the developer. Our primary issues are:
1. We are concerned that the development follow the new stormwater rules in regards to runoff and water
quality. These two streams contain the runoff for a large portion of the Stonehenge and Parklyn
subdivisions (well over 100 acres of land). We have noticed more and more particulate buildup in the
affected creeks as development has occurred upstream, and are concerned for die purity of the water
and the effect more building will have on Lake Lynn and the Neuse River Basin.
2. We are concerned that development on lots 1 though 4 will have significant sedimentary impact on
the more northerly creek, since these lots, especially lots 1 and 2, currently provide the main runoff
conduit for the Parklyn subdivision. When Parklyn was built, mud and water frequently covered
Knebworth Court and washed downhill into the stream. This damaged adjoining properly and the
environmental impact is still apparent.
3. We are concerned about lite amount of impervious surface this development would create. This area
has been seriously flooded on two occasions (Hurricanes Fran and Floyd) and the streams regularly
escape their banks during even minor rain events. The amount and speed of the water flow in these two
streams has significantly increased in the last several years. We are wondering about whether there is
need for some sort of holding pond or filtering facility to control the runoff and reduce the amount of
potential flooding on this property.
4. We, and other area landowners, request that a formal public hearing be scheduled to address these
concerns.
We thank you in advance for your input and consideration in these issues. Please contact Lucy Ringland
(919-6764459) or Alice Lutz (919-870-8456) if you need any further information or clarification about our
concerns.
Sincerely,

October 10, 2001
NCDENR
Cindy Karoly
2321 Crabtree Blvd.
Raleigh, NC 27604
Project # 010833
Dear Ms. Karoly,
We arc writing to voice our concerns about the Stonehaven subdivision, which is currently under review by
your office. We do not oppose this development, per se, but are very concerned about a few critical issues,
which ive would like addressed by either your department or the developer. Our primary issues are:
1. We are concerned that the development follow the new stormwater rules in regards to runoff and water
quality. These two streams contain the runoff for a large portion of the Stonehenge and Parklyn
subdivisions (well over 100 acres of land). We have noticed more and more particulate buildup in the
affected creeks as development has occurred upstream, and are concerned for the purity of the water
and the effect more building will have on Lake Lynn and the Neuse River Basin.
2. We are concerned that development on lots 1 through 4 will have significant sedimentary impact on
the more northerly creek, since these lots, especially lots I and 2, currently provide the main runoff
conduit for the Parklyn subdivision. When Parklyn was built, mud and water frequently covered
Knebworth Court and washed downhill into the stream. This damaged adjoining property and the
environmental impact is still apparent.
3. We are concerned about the amount of impervious surface this development would create. This area
has been seriously flooded on two occasions (Hurricanes Fran and Floyd) and the streams regularly
escape their banks during even minor rain events. The amount and speed of the water flow in these two
streams has significantly increased in the last several years. We are wondering about whether there is
need for some sort of holding pond or filtering facility to control the runoff and reduce the amount of
potential flooding on this property.
4. We, and other area landowners, request that a formal public hearing be scheduled to address these
concerns.
We thank you in advance for your input and consideration in these issues. Please contact Lucy Ringland
(919-6764459) or Alice Lutz (919-870-8456) if you need any further information or clarification about our
concerns.
Sincerely,
12
October 10, 2001
NCDENR
Cindy Karoly
2321 Crabtree Blvd.
Raleigh, NC 27604
Project # 010833
Dear Ms. Karoly,
We are writing to voice our concerns about the Stonehaven subdivision, which is currently under review by
your office. We do not oppose this development, per se, but are very concerned about a few critical issues,
which we would like addressed by either your department or the developer. Our primary issues are:
1. We are concerned that the development follow the new stormwater rules in regards to runoff and water
quality. These two streams contain the runoff for a large portion of the Stonehenge and Parklyn
subdivisions (well over 100 acres of land). We have noticed more and more particulate buildup in the
affected creeks as development has occurred upstream, and are concerned for the purity of the water
and the effect more building will have on Lake Lynn and the Neuse River Basin.
2. We are concerned that development on lots 1 through 4 will have significant sedimentary impact on
the more northerly creek, since these lots, especially lots 1 and 2, currently provide the main runoff
conduit for the Parklyn subdivision. When Parklyn was built, mud and water frequently covered
Knebworth Court and washed downhill into (lie stream. This damaged adjoining property and the
environmental impact is still apparent.
3. We are concerned about the amount of impervious surface this development would create. This area
has been seriously flooded on two occasions (Hurricanes Fran and Floyd) and the streams regularly
escape their banks during even minor rain events. The amount and speed of the water flow in these two
streams has significantly increased in the last several years. We are wondering about whether there is
need for some sort of holding pond or filtering facility to control the runoff and reduce the amount of
potential flooding on this property.
4. We, and other area landowners, request that a formal public hearing be scheduled to address these
concerns.
We thank you in advance for your input and consideration in these issues. Please contact Lucy Ringland
(919-6764459) or Alice Lutz (919-870-8456) if you need any further information or clarification about our
concerns.
Sincerely,

October 10, 2001
NCDENR
Cindy Karoly
2321 Crabtree Blvd.
Raleigh, NC 27604
Project # 010833
Dear Ms. Karoly,
We are writing to voice our concerns about the Stonehaven subdivision, which is currently under review by
your office. We do not oppose this development, per se, but are very concerned about a few critical issues,
which we would like addressed by either your department or the developer. Our primary issues are:
1. We are concerned that the development follow the new stormwater rules in regards to runoff and water
quality. These two streams contain the runoff for a large portion of the Stonehenge and Parklyn
subdivisions (well over 100 acres of land). We have noticed more and more particulate buildup in the
affected creeks as development has occurred upstream, and are concerned for the purity of the water
and the effect more building will have on Lake Lynn and the Neuse River Basin.
2. We are concerned that development on lots 1 through 4 will have significant sedimentary impact on
the more northerly creek, since these lots, especially lots 1 and 2, currently provide the main runoff
conduit for the Parklyn subdivision. When Parklyn was built, mud and water frequently covered
Knebworth Court and washed downhill into the stream. This damaged adjoining property and the
environmental impact is still apparent.
3. We are concerned about the amount of impervious surface this development would create. This area
has been seriously flooded on two occasions (Hurricanes Fran and Floyd) and the streams regularly
escape their banks during even minor train events. The amount and speed of the water flow in these two
streams has significantly increased in the last several years. We are wondering about whether there is
need for some sort of bolding pond or filtering facility to control the runoff and reduce the amount of
potential flooding on this property.
4. We, and other area landowners, request that a formal public hearing be scheduled to address these
concerns.
We thank you in advance for your input and consideration in these issues. Please contact Lucy Ringland
(919-6764459) or Alice Lutz (919-870-8456) if you need any further inforniation or clarification about our
concerns.
Sincerely,
? n ,
October 10, 2001
NCDENR
Cindy Karoly
2321 Crabtree Blvd.
Raleigh, NC 27604
Project # 010833
Dear Ms. Karoly,
We are writing to voice our concerns about the Stonehaven subdivision, which is currently under review by
your office. We do not oppose this development, per se, but are very concerned about a few critical issues,
which we would like addressed by either your department or the developer. Our primacy issues are:
1. We are concerned that the development follow the new stormwater rules in regards to runoff and water
quality. These two streams contain the runoff for a large portion of the Stonehenge and Parklyn
subdivisions (well over 100 acres of land). We have noticed more and more particulate buildup in the
affected creeks as development has occurred upstream, and are concerned for die purity of the water
and the effect more building will have on Lake Lynn and the Neuse River Basin.
2. We are concerned that development on lots 1 through 4 will have significant sedimentary impact on
the more northerly creek, since these lots, especially lots 1 and 2, currently provide the main runoff
conduit for the Parklyn subdivision. When Parklyn was built, mud and water frequently covered
Knebworth Court and washed downhill into the stream. This damaged adjoining property and the
environmental impact is still apparent.
3. We are concerned about the amount of impervious surface this development would create. This area
has been seriously flooded on two occasions (Hurricanes Fran and Floyd) and the streams regularly
escape their banks during even minor rain events. The amount and speed of the water flow in these two
streams has significantly increased in the last several years. We are wondering about whether there is
need for some sort of holding pond or filtering facility to control the runoff and reduce the amount of
potential flooding on this property.
4. We, and other area landowners, request that a formal public hearing be scheduled to address these
concerns.
We thank you in advance for your input and consideration in these issues. Please contact Lucy Ringland
(919-6764459) or Alice Lutz (919-870-8456) if you need any further information or clarification about our
concerns.
Sincerely,
L) JV)J .4L
f? ILL?G' ,
October 10, 2001
NCDENR
Cindy Karoly
2321 Crabtree Blvd.
Raleigh, NC 27604
Project # 010833
Dear Ms. Karoly,
We are writing to voice our concerns about the Stonehaven subdivision, which is currently under review by
your office. We do not oppose this development, per se, but are very concerned about a few critical issues,
which we would like addressed by either your department or the developer. Our primary issues are:
1. We are concerned that the development follow the new stormwater rules in regards to runoff and water
quality. These two streams contain the runoff for a large portion of the Stonehenge and Parklyn
subdivisions (well over 100 acres of land). We have noticed more and more particulate buildup in the
affected creeks as development has occurred upstream, and are concerned for the purity of the water
and the effect more building will have on Lake Lynn and the Neuse River Basin.
2. We are concerned that development on lots I through 4 will have significant sedimentary impact on
the more northerly creek, since these lots, especially lots 1 and 2, currently provide the main runoff
conduit for the Parklyn subdivision. When Parklyn was built, mud and water frequently covered
Kncbworth Court and washed downhill into the stream. This damaged adjoining property and the
environmental impact is still apparent.
3. We are concerned about the amount of impervious surface this development would create. This area
has been seriously flooded on two occasions (Hurricanes Fran and Floyd) and the streams regularly
escape their batiks during even minor rain events. The amount and speed of the water flow in these two
streams has significantly increased in the last several years. We are wondering about whether there is
need for some sort of holding pond or filtering facility to control the runoff and reduce the amount of
potential flooding on this property.
4. We, and other area landowners, request that a formal public hearing be scheduled to address these
concerns.
We thank you in advance for your input and consideration in these issues. Please contact Lucy Ringland
(919-6764459) or Alice Lutz (9t9-870-8456) if you need any further information or clarification about our
concerns.
Sincerely,
7
I?

dI 1,4d f)
ki r
October 10, 2001
NCDENR
Cindy Karoly
2321 Crabtree Blvd.
Raleigh, NC 27604
Project # 010833
Dear Ms. Karoly,
We are writing to voice our concerns about the Stonehaven subdivision, which is currently under review by
your office. We do not oppose this development, per se, but are very concerned about a few critical issues,
which we would like addressed by either your department or the developer. Our primary issues are:
1. We are concerned that the development follow the new stonnwater rules in regards to runoff and water
quality. These two streams contain the runoff for a large portion of the Stonehenge and Parklyn
subdivisions (well over 100 acres of land). We have noticed more and more particulate buildup in the
affected creeks as development has occurred upstream, and are concerned for the purity of the water
and the effect more building will have on Lake Lynn and the Neuse River Basin.
2. We arc concerned that development on lots 1 through 4 will have significant sedimentary impact on
the more northerly creek, since these lots, especially lots 1 and 2, currently provide the main runoff
conduit for the Parklyn subdivision. When Parklyn was built, mud and water frequently covered
Knebworth Court and washed downhill into the stream. This damaged adjoining property and the
environmental impact is still apparent.
3. We are concerned about the amount of impervious surface this development would create. This area
has been seriously flooded on two occasions (Hurricanes Fran and Floyd) and the streams regularly
escape their banks during even minor rain events. The amount and speed of the water flow in these two
streams has significantly increased in the last several years. We are wondering about whether there is
need for some sort of holding pond or filtering facility to control the runoff and reduce the amount of
potential flooding on this property.
4. We, and other area landowners, request that a formal public hearing be scheduled to address these
concerns.
We thank you in advance for your input and consideration in these issues. Please contact Lucy Ringland
(919-6764459) or Alice Lutz (919-870-8456) if you need any further information or clarification about our
concerns.
Sincerely,
October 10, 2001
NCDENR
Cindy Karoly
2321 Crabtree Blvd.
Raleigh, NC 27604
Project # 010833
Dear Ms. Karoly,
We are writing to voice our concerns about the Stonehaven subdivision, which is currently under review by
your office. We do not oppose this development, per se, but are very concerned about a few critical issues,
which we would like addressed by either your department or the developer. Our primary issues are:
1. We are concerned that the development follow the new stormwater rules in regards to runoff and water
quality. These two streams contain the runoff for a large portion of the Stonehenge and Parklyn
subdivisions (well over 100 acres of land). We have noticed more and more particulate buildup in the
affected creeks as development has occurred upstream, and are concerned for the purity of the water
and the effect more building will have on Lake Lynn and the Neuse River Basin.
2. We are concerned that development on lots 1 through 4 will have significant sedimentary impact on
(lie more northerly creek, since these lots, especially lots I and 2, currently provide the main runoff
conduit for the Parklyn subdivision. When Parklyn was built, mud and water frequently covered
Knebworth Court and washed downhill into the stream. This damaged adjoining property and the
environmental impact is still apparent.
3. We are concerned about the amount of impervious surface this development would create. This area
has been seriously flooded on two occasions (Hurricanes Fran and Floyd) and the streams regularly
escape their banks during even minor rain events. The amount and speed of the water flow in these two
streams has significantly increased in the last several years. We are wondering about whether there is
need for some sort of holding pond or filtering facility to control the runoff and reduce the amount of
potential flooding on this property.
4. We, and other area landowners, request that a formal public hearing be scheduled to address these
concerns.
We thank you in advance for your input and consideration in these issues. Please contact Lucy Ringland
(919-676-4459) or Alice Lutz (919-870-8456) if you need any further inforniation or clarification about our
concerns.
Sincerely,
October 10, 2001
NCDENR
Cindy Karoly
2321 Crabtree Blvd.
Raleigh, NC 27604
Project # 010833
Dear Ms. Karoly,
We are writing to voice our concerns about the Stonchaven subdivision, which is currently under review by
your office. We do not oppose this development, per se, but are very concerned about a few critical issues,
which we would like addressed by either your department or the developer. Our primary issues are:
1. We are concerned that the devclopmcnt follow the new stonnwater rules in regards to runoff and water
quality. These two streams contain the runoff for a large portion of the Stonelienge and Parklyn
subdivisions (well over 100 acres of land). We have noticed more and more particulate buildup in the
affected creeks as development has occurred upstream, and arc concerned for the purity of the water
and (lie effect more building will have on Lake Lynn and the Neuse River Basin.
2. We are concerned that devclopmcnt on lots I through 4 will have significant sedimentary impact on
the more northerly creek, since these lots, especially lots I and 2, currently provide the main runoff
conduit for the Parklyn subdivision. Wlicn Parklyn was built, mud and water frequently covered
Knebworlh Court and washed downhill into the stream. This damaged adjoining property and the
environmental impact is still apparent.
3. We are concerned about the amount of impervious surface this development would create. This area
has been seriously flooded on two occasions (Hurricanes Fran and Floyd) and the streams regularly
escape their banks during even minor rain events. The amount and speed of the water flow in these two
streams has significantly increased in the last several years. We are wondering about whether there is
need for some sort of holding pond or Filtering facility to control the rnnoff and reduce the amount of
potential flooding on this property.
4. We, and other area landowners, request that a formal public hearing be scheduled to address these
concerns.
We thank you in advance for your input and consideration in these issues. Please contact Lucy Ringland
(919-676-4459) or Alice Lutz (919-870-8456) if you need any further information or clarification about our
concerns.
Sincerely,
Ce'.4-
?--
016*LO--b '??.
?
October 10, 2001
NCDENR
Cindy Karoly
2321 Crabtree Blvd.
Raleigh, NC 27604
Proicct # 010833
Dear Ms. Karoly,
We arc writing to voice our concerns about the Stonehaven subdivision, which is currently under review by
your office. We do not oppose this development, per se, but are very concerned about a few critical issues,
which we would like addressed by either your department or the developer. Our primary issues arc:
L We are concerned that the development follow (lie new slormwater rules in regards to runoff and water
quality. These two streams contain the runoff fora large portion of the Stonehenge and Parklyn
subdivisions (well over 100 acres of land). We have noticed more and more particulate buildup in the
affected creeks as development has occurred upstream, and are concerned for the purity of the water
and the effect more building will have on Lake Lynn and the Neuse River Basin.
2. We arc concerned that development on lots 1 through 4 will have significant sedimentary impact on
the more northerly creek, since these lots, especially lots 1 and 2, currently provide the main runoff
conduit for the Parklyn subdivision. When Parklyn was built, mud and water frequently covered
Kncbworth Court and washed downhill into the stream. This damaged adjoining properly and the
environmental impact is still apparent.
3. We are concerned about the amount of impervious surface this development would create. This area
has been seriously flooded on two occasions (Hurricanes Fran and Floyd) and the streams regularly
escape their banks during even minor rain events. The amount and speed of the water flow in these two
streams has significantly increased in the last several years. We are wondering about whether there is
need for some sort of holding pond or filtering facility to control the runoff and reduce the amount of
potential flooding on this property.
4. We, and other area landowners, request that a formal public hearing be scheduled to address these
concerns.
We thank you in advance for your input and consideration in these issues. Please contact Lucy Ringland
(919-676-4459) or Alice Lutz (919-870-8456) if you need any further information or clarification about our
concerns.
Sin ?rcly,
1 i )
Ucie A 'A?- 1?//-g
October 10, 2001
NCDENR
Cindy Karoly
2321 Crabtree Blvd.
Raleigh, NC 27604
Project # 010833
Dear Ms. Karoly,
We arc writing to voice our concerns about file Stonchavcn subdivision, which is currently under review by
your office. We do not oppose tlus development, per se, but arc very concerned about a few critical issues,
which we would like addressed by either your department or the developer. Our primary issues are:
1. We arc concerned that the development follow the new stormwater rules in regards to runoff and water
quality. These two streams contain the runoff for a large portion of the Stonehenge and Parklyn
subdivisions (well over 100 acres of land). We have noticed more and more particulate buildup in the
affected creeks as development has occurred upstream, and are concerned for the purity of the water
and the effect more building will have on Lake Lynn and the Ncusc River Basin.
2. We are concerned that development on lots I through 4 will have significant sedimentary impact on
the more northerly creek, since these lots, especially lots I and 2, currently provide the main runoff
conduit for the Parklyn subdivision. When Parklyn was built, mud and water frequently covered
Knebworth Court and washed downhill into the stream. This damaged adjoining property and the
environmental impact is still apparent.
3. We are concerned about the amount of impervious surface this development would create. This area
has been seriously flooded on two occasions (Hurricanes Fran and Floyd) and the streams regularly
escape their banks during even minor rain events. The amount and speed of the water flow in these two
streams has significantly increased in the last several years. We arc wondering about whether there is
need for some sort of holding pond or filtering facility to control the nmoff and reduce the amount of
potential flooding on this property.
4. We, and other area landowners, request that a formal public hearing be scheduled to address these
concerns.
We thank you in advance for your input and consideration in these issues. Please contact Lucy Ringland
(919-6764459) or Alice Lutz (919-870-8456) if you need any further information or clarification about our
concerns.
Sincerely,
f3o0 lege? 0
k-I e, ? Ne Z7b13
NO ?-n 3 4A
October 10. 2001
NCDENR
Cindy Karoly
2321 Crabtree Blvd.
Raleigh, NC 27604
Project # 010833
Dear Ms. Karoly,
We are writing to voice our concerns about the Stonchaven subdivision, which is currently under review by
your office. We do not oppose this development, per se, but are very concerned about a few critical issues,
which we would like addressed by either your department or the developer. Our primary issues are:
1. We are concerned that the development follow the new stonnwater rules in regards to runoff and water
quality. These two streams contain the nmoff for a large portion of the Stonehenge and Parklyn
subdivisions (well over 100 acres of land). We have noticed more and more particulate buildup in the
affected creeks as development has occurred upstream, and are concerned for the purity of the water
and the effect more building will have on Lake Lynn and the Neuse River Basin.
2. We are concerned that development on lots 1 through 4 will have significant sedimentary impact on
the more northerly creek, since these lots, especially lots 1 and 2, currently provide the main runoff
conduit for the Parklyn subdivision. When Parklyn was built, mud and water frequently covered
Knebworth Court and washed downhill into the stream. This damaged adjoining property and the
environmental impact is still apparent.
3. We are concerned about the amount of impervious surface this development would create. This area
has been seriously flooded on two occasions (Hurricanes Fran and Floyd) and the streams regularly
escape their banks during even minor rain events. The amount and speed of the water flow in these two
streams has significantly increased in the last several years. We are wondering about whether there is
need for some sort of holding pond or filtering facility to control lie runoff and reduce the amount of
potential flooding on this property.
4. We, and other area landowners, request that a formal public hearing be scheduled to address these
concerns.
We thank you in advance for your input and consideration in these issues. Please contact Lucy Ringland
(919-6764459) or Alice Lutz (919-870-8456) if you need any further information or clarification about our
concerns.
Sincerely,
&V? "ns
2?I1Z. .?? r^, ??
?I(, 2?b13 -?4 4 2
October 10, 2001
NCDENR
Cindy Karoly
2321 Crabtree Blvd.
Raleigh, NC 27604
Project # 010833
Dear Ms. Karoly,
We are writing to voice our concerns about the Stonehaven subdivision, which is currently under review by
your office. We do not oppose this development, per se, but are very concerned about a few critical issues,
which we would like addressed by either your department or the developer. Our primary issues are:
1. We are concerned that the development follow the new stormwater rules in regards to runoff and water
quality. These two streams contain the runoff for a large portion of the Stonehenge and Parklyn
subdivisions (well over 100 acres of land). We have noticed more and more particulate buildup in the
affected creeks as development has occurred upstream, and are concerned for the purity of the water
and the effect more building will have on Lake Lynn and the Neuse River Basin.
2. We arc concerned that development on lots 1 through 4 will have significant sedimentary impact on
the more northerly creek, since these lots, especially lots 1 and 2, currently provide the main runoff
conduit for the Parklyn subdivision. When Parklyn was built, mud and water frequently covered
Knebworth Court and washed downhill into the stream. This damaged adjoining property and the
environmental impact is still apparent.
3. We are concerned about the amount of impervious surface this development would create. This area
has been seriously flooded on two occasions (Hurricanes Fran and Floyd) and the streams regularly
escape their banks during even minor rain events. The amount and speed of the water flow in these two
streams has significantly increased in the last several years. We are wondering about whether there is
need for some sort of holding pond or filtering facility to control the runoff and reduce the amount of
potential flooding on this property.
4. We, and other area landowners, request that a formal public hearing be scheduled to address these
concerns.
We thank you in advance for your input and consideration in these issues. Please contact Lucy Ringland
(919-6764459) or Alice Lutz (919-870-8456) if you need any further information or clarification about our
concerns.
Sincerely, t
IWE 1l'1 9wo(f y CT-
????1,( IYC' x&1-3
October 10, 2001
NCDENR
Cindy Karoly
2321 Crabtree Blvd.
Raleigh, NC 27604
Project # 010833
Dear Ms. Karoly,
We are writing to voice our concerns about the Stonehaven subdivision, which is cuffendy under review by
your office. We do not oppose this development, per se, but are very concerned about a few critical issues,
which we would like addressed by either your department or the developer. Our primary issues are:
1. We are concerned that the development follow the new stormwater rides in regards to runoff and water
quality. These two streams contain the runoff for a large portion of the Stonehenge and Parklyn
subdivisions (well over 100 acres of land). We have noticed more and more particulate buildup in the
affected creeks as development has occurred upstream, and are concerned for the purity of the water
and the effect more building will have on Lake Lynn and the Neuse River Basin.
2. We are concerned that development on lots 1 through 4 will have significant sedimentary impact on
the more northerly creek, since these lots, especially lots 1 and 2, currently provide the main runoff
conduit for the Parklyn subdivision. When Parklyn was built, mud and water frequently covered
Knebworth Court and washed downhill into the stream. This damaged adjoining property and the
environmental impact is still apparent.
3. We are concerned about the amount of impervious surface this development would create. This area
has been seriously flooded on two occasions (Hurricanes Fran and Floyd) and the streams regularly
escape their banks during even minor rain events. The amount and speed of the water flow in these two
streams has significantly increased in the last several years. We are wondering about whether there is
need for some sort of holding pond or filtering facility to control die runoff and reduce the amount of
potential flooding on this property.
4. We, and other area landowners, request that a formal public hearing be scheduled to address these
concerns.
We thank you in advance for your input and consideration in these issues. Please contact Lucy Ringland
(919-6764459) or Alice Lutz (919-870-8456) if you need any further information or clarification about our
concerns.
Sincerely,
It A,
? r
October 10, 2001
NCDENR
Cindy Karoly
2321 Crabtree Blvd.
Raleigh, NC 27604
Project # 010833
Dear Ms. Karoly,
We are writing to voice our concerns about the Stonehaven subdivision, which is currently under review by
your office. We do not oppose this development, per se, but are very concerned about a few critical issues,
which we would like addressed by either your department or the developer. Our primary issues are:
1. We are concerned that the development follow the new stormwater rules in regards to runoff and water
quality. These two streams contain (lie runoff for a large portion of the Stonehenge and Parklyn
subdivisions (well over 100 acres of land). We have noticed more and more particulate buildup in the
affected creeks as development has occurred upstream, and are concerned for the purity of the water
and the effect more building will have on Lake Lynn and the Neuse River Basin.
2. We arc concerned that development on lots 1 through 4 will have significant sedimentary impact on
the more northerly creek, since these lots, especially lots 1 and 2, currently provide the main runoff
conduit for the Parklyn subdivision. When Parklyn was built, mud and water frequently covered
Knebworth Court and washed downhill into the stream. This damaged adjoining property and the
environmental impact is still apparent.
3. We are concerned about the amount of impervious surface this development would create. This area
his been seriously flooded on two occasions (Hurricanes Fran and Floyd) and the streams regularly
escape their banks during even minor rain events. The amount and speed of the water flow in these two
streams has significantly increased in the last several years. We are wondering about whether there is
need for some sort of holding pond or filtering facility to control the runoff and reduce the amount of
potential flooding on this property.
4. We, and other area landowners, request that a formal public hearing be scheduled to address these
concerns.
We thank you in advance for your input and consideration in these issues. Please contact Lucy Ringland
(919-6764459) or Alice Lutz (919-870-8456) if you need any further inforniation or clarification about our
concerns.
Sincerely,
October 10, 2001
NCDENR
Cindy Karoly
2321 Crabtree Blvd.
Raleigh, NC 27604
Project # 010833
Dear Ms. Karoly,
We are writing to voice our concerns about the Stonehaven subdivision, which is currently under review by
your office. We do not oppose tliis development, per se, but are very concerned about a few critical issues,
which we would like addressed by either your department or the developer. Our primary issues are:
1. We are concemed that the development follow the new stormwater riles in regards to runoff and water
quality. These two streams contain the runoff for a large portion of the Stonehenge and Parklyn
subdivisions (well over 100 acres of land). We have noticed more and more particulate buildup in the
affected creeks as development has occurred upstream, and are concerned for the purity of the water
and the effect more building will have on Lake Lynn and the Neuse River Basin.
2. We are concerned that development on lots 1 through 4 will have significant sedimentary impact on
the more northerly creek, since these lots, especially lots 1 and 2, currently provide the main runoff
conduit for the Parklyn subdivision. When Parklyn was built, mud and water frequently covered
Knebworth Court and washed downhill into the stream. This damaged adjoining property and the
environmental impact is still apparent.
3. We are concerned about the amount of impervious surface this development would create. This area
has been seriously flooded on two occasions (Hurricanes Fran and Floyd) and the streams regularly
escape their banks during even minor rain events. The amount and speed of the water flow in these two
streams has significantly increased in the last several years. We are wondering about whether there is
need for some sort of holding pond or filtering facility to control the runoff and reduce the amount of
potential flooding on this property.
4. We, and other area landowners, request that a formal public hearing be scheduled to address these
concerns.
We thank you in advance for your input and consideration in these issues. Please contact Lucy Ringland
(919-6764459) or Alice Lutz (919-870-8456) if you need any further information or clarification about our
concerns.
Sincerely,
r
i
October 10, 2001
NCDENR
Cindy Karoly
2321 Crabtree Blvd.
Raleigh, NC 27604
Project # 010833
Dear Ms. Karoly,
We arc writing to voice our concerns about the Stonehaven subdivision, which is currently under review by
your office. We do not oppose this development, per se, but are very concerned about a few critical issues,
which we would like addressed by either your department or the developer. Our primary issues are:
1. We are concerned that the development follow the new stornwater rules in regards to runoff and water
quality. These two streams contain the runoff for a large portion of the Stonehenge and Parklyn
subdivisions (well over 100 acres of land). We have noticed more and more particulate buildup in the
affected creeks as development has occurred upstream, and are concerned for the purity of the water
and the effect more building will have on Lake Lynn and the Neuse River Basin.
2. We arc concerned that development on lots 1 through 4 will have significant sedimentary impact on
the more northerly creek, since these lots, especially lots 1 and 2, currently provide the main runoff
conduit for the Parklyn subdivision. When Parklyn was built, mud and water frequently covered
Knebworth Court and washed downhill into the stream. This damaged adjoining property and the
environmental impact is still apparent.
3. We are concerned about the amount of impervious surface this development would create. This area
has been seriously flooded on two occasions (Hurricanes Fran and Floyd) and the streams regularly
escape their banks during even minor rain events. The amount and speed of the water flow in these two
streams has significantly increased in the last several years. We are wondering about whether there is
need for some sort of holding pond or filtering facility to control the runoff and reduce the amount of
potential flooding on this property.
4. We, and other area landowners, request that a formal public hearing be scheduled to address these
concerns.
We thank you in advance for your input and consideration in these issues. Please contact Lucy Ringland
(919-676-4459) or Alice Lutz (919-870-8456) if you need any further information or clarification about our
concerns.
Sincerely,
n
i_
8133 Knebwer(4i C4-

October 10, 2001
NCDENR
Cindy Karoly
2321 Crabtree Blvd.
Raleigh, NC 27604
Project # 010833
Dear Ms. Karoly,
We are writing to voice our concerns about the Stonehaven subdivision, which is currently under review by
your office. We do not oppose this development, per se, but are very concerned about a few critical issues,
which we would like addressed by either your department or the developer. Our primary issues are:
1. We are concerned that the development follow the new stortnwater rules in regards to runoff and water
quality. These two streams contain the runoff for a large portion of the Stonehenge and Parklyn
subdivisions (well over 100 acres of land). We have noticed more and more particulate buildup in the
affected creeks as development has occurred upstream, and are concerned for the purity of the water
and the effect more building will have on Lake Lynn and the Neuse River Basin.
2. We are concerned that development on lots 1 through 4 will have significant sedimentary impact on
the more northerly creek, since these lots, especially lots 1 and 2, currently provide the main runoff
conduit for the Parklyn subdivision. When Parklyn was built, mud and water frequently covered
Knebwortli Court and washed downhill into the stream. This damaged adjoining property and the
environmental impact is still apparent.
3. We are concerned about the amount of impervious surface this development would create. This area
has been seriously flooded on two occasions (Hurricanes Fran and Floyd) and the streams regularly
escape their banks during even minor rain events. The amount and speed of the water flow in these two
streams has significantly increased in the last several years. We are wondering about whether there is
need for some sort of holding pond or filtering facility to control the runoff and reduce the amount of
potential flooding on this property.
4. We, and other area landowners, request that a formal public hearing be scheduled to address these
concerns.
We thank you in advance for your input and consideration in these issues. Please contact Lucy Ringland
(919-6764459) or Alice Lutz (919-870-8456) if you need any further inforniation or clarification about our
concerns.
Sincerely,
NOV- THE PRESCOTT COMPANY LLC
\\ ?? 0?0
TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERS AND SITE PLANNERS
16 Chancery Place • Durham, North Carolina • 27707
/ Phone or Fax [phone] • Cellular 919.270.2814 • Email lirescottdd@mindspring. coin
DATE
TO
FROM
FACSIMILE
.' /.. '/ ..........................................................................................? ..........
................................................................................................................................
Brian P. Ruff, P.E.
Project Engineer
RE: ........dl.. ad' .......................

ATTACHMENTS:
COPIES DATE NO. DESCRIPTION
.............. ..3?.1......................T,-G?....'...r?y...?,?:?,?.?,?
...............-.., 3,l .. ....?.....................
G'4r :... -1...=?f).............................
REMARKS:
i?...........?...... ?.!lllrC.... / .................
......., ..........r ? .........,C"Lc'? c% .......,G?n 7.A110.57.4
......1 J........ Wi -*.....14&11.,l ....... ?? ??? .........
...................................................................................................................................................
' .....Issvc ...... / .. ....... 12 ............ . . ......T ,s....../? ?
. .....50 . ......................................................................................................... 000f zv,0000,10
. ..........................
EXISTING RINGLAND ROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY
SHOWN AS HATCHED AREA PER WAKE CO. MAP
GENERAL NOTES 0
KEYSTONE RETAINING WALL a
~ 1. BOUNDARY INFORMATION WAS TAKEN FROM A m MAP PREPARED BY PEACOCK LAND SURVEYING,
o BENSON, NC, 27504, MAP N0, 99-0816-C, AND
KNEBWOR H ~ REPRODUCED BY S.D. PUCKETT ASSOCIATES, ~ DURHAM NC. EXISTING IRON PINS WERE FIELD
o CHECKED AND SHALL BE PROPERLY INDICATED ON
Q ~ THE FINAL PLAT. - -
0 0 2. CITY OF RALEIGH SUBDIVISION ~S 44 01 o! w 3. STREET TOPOGRAPHY WAS OBTAINED BY AN
y. ~ ACTUAL FIELD SURVEY BY S.D. PUCKETT
Q ASSOCIATES, DURHAM NC, ~ 4. DOWNSTREAM SS MH EXISTING INFORMATION
HOWARD RD WAS APPROXIMATED; ACTUAL ELEVATION OF
ROAD CROSSING ~1 EXISTING INVERT AND PIPE SIZE TO BE FIELD NEUSE RIVER RULE IMPACT SUMMARY VERIFIED.
STREAM IMPACT LENGTH= 141 LF ALONG CENTERLINE z 5. ANY LAND SUBJECTED TO INCLREASED WATER
( ) ~ LEVELS SHALL BE DESIGNATED AS FLOOD ZONE 1 IMPACT AREA = 5851 SF J STORAGE AREAS" AND DELINEATED AND RECORDED
~ ~ ~ \ ~ , ZONE 2 IMPACT AREA = 4129 SF Q IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 10-3057 OF THE
~ w'~ I I _ ~ , / / I NOTE: AREAS INCLUDE FILL SLOPES/STONE ~ CITY CODE.
\ , 1 / ~ I I/ , p 6. LOT DIMENSIONS ARE APPROXIMATE. ~ 7. A CONDITION OF APPROVAL OF THIS PLAN WILL
\ .o _ I ~ ~ ~ ~ , I' BE THAT THE OWNER SUBMIT A PETITION FOR
I Z I ~ 1 ANNEXATION AFTER THE APPROVAL OF THE PRELIMINARY PLAN, AND RIOR TO RECORDING OF
J f r ~a \ ~ Q ~ I ROAD CROSSING 2 LOT OR ISSUANCE OF ANY CONSTRUCTION PERMITS.
I ' r T ~ N/F LOT 4, PHASE 3 ~ } ! w a PARKLYN WOODS S/D ,o ~ ~ ~ CONTACT KAREN DUKE ®890-3656. ~ NEUSE RIVER RULE IMPACT SUMMARY VICINITY MAP n.t.s. 8. NEUSE RIVER TRIBUTARIES EXIST ON THE
r ~ ~ ~ ~ Zm / S o I Q STREAM IMPACT = 136 LF (ALONG CENTERLINE) PROPERTY. APPLICATION FOR PERMIT TO CRO55
~3.4~, I / z „ i ~ ~ ZONE 1 IMPACT AREA - 4062 SF TWO NRBR STREAMS (SECTION 401) IS MADE TO
m 4 f I ~ , ~ 15 61 • \ ~ ~ IMPACT AREA - 7 F NCDENR-DWQ. PERMIT PENDING. ZONE 2 - 2 65 S 9. THE SITE HAS BEEN INVESTIGATED FOR THE
m ' / S8 3884 11 ~ - ~ , I .6 , A , ~ - NOTE; AREAS INCLUDE FILL SLOPES STONE PRESENCE of wETLANDS BY cooPER /
~ i ~ . ENVIRONMENTAL, INC., 2300 SARDIS ROAD NORTH SUITE Q, CHARLOTTE NC 28227. PHONE
I ~ ~ s~ . , ~ i ~ I 4 ~V 4 8„ ~ , i ~ 704.645.2000. NO SECTION 404 WETLANDS EXIST
\ 3 f ~ 0 87 _ . . 68 ~ ~ , -6 ~ , BEYOND TOP OF BANK, AS INDICATED. 10. CURRENT PROPERTY OWNER: KARAM, MICHAEL
O ~ 1 ~G 1 ~ Q S 81' ' » ~i 11 N/F GERALD T. LUTZ Lutz Q. do MARY, 82
8 18 ~ - 1, 7 0 ~ E 431. 8' ~ ~ OB 4508 PG 484 84 11. THE BUILDING CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE TO VERIFY ALL BUILDING SETBACK
m O ryp, _ ~ I 'I ~ 0 S ~lf~, >;OE AR N/F T.P. RINGLAN REQUIREMENTS WITH THE INSPECTIONS DEPARTMENT.
I DB 6199 PG 8 \ - 12. COUNTOURS, SOILS AND PLANIMETRICS SHOWN
1 ~ •4 I ARE FROM WAKE COUNTY MAPS AND ARE APPROXIMATE.
" 19256 SF ~ \ A \ 1 / , ~ I SUMMARY 13. ALL LOTS TO BE RECORDED AT ONCE. NO
c r i ~ , / PHASING IS PROPOSED.
co ~ 11250 SF < Fs\ ~ rr ~ / ~ \ \ .1 ~J t0 ~ / 1. TOTAL AREA: 6.39 ACRES
` 2. TOTAL NUMBER OF LOTS: 15 EA
= - ~ ~ 3 " ' ~ ~ ~ 126 SF ~ B ah SID o 'Op• BFE 369.5 ~ ~ ~ 3. WAKE COUNTY P.I.N.: 0797.05-19-0179
R A 0 Ro A 13261 S o D S ~ w T • ~ ~ ~ lT 20' PUB_- ~
y-~ L LIC Uill ES ~ ~ l\ / Mi 4. DENSITY: 2.35 UNITS PER ACRE
I' ~ / ~ ~ ~ , - _ 0.00 5. STREET RIGHT-OF-WAY: 1.1 AC
x ~ ~
w ~ _ ` / ~ 4~ 15 6. MINIMUM /AVERAGE LOT SIZE: 10890 SF / 15362 SF
~ 294 ' 0 ti 17432 SF .74 MINIMUM LOT WIDTH 65 Fl'
N 84'25 14" ~ BFE 370.3 ~ W 91.89' 0 MINIMUM CORNER LOT WIDTH 80 F'' MINIMUM LOT DEPTH 100 f7
p oo ' 9'21', 07, 0 REQUIRED SETBACKS
. FRONT YARD 20 FT, REAR YARD 30 FT, AGGREGATE 40 FT
000 , I ~ / p0 ~ 5 CONC. SW ~Q , 510E YARD 10 FT, CORNER 510E YARD 20 FT, AGGREGATE 20 FT
_ i I ~ ~ ~ ~ 7. PART OF AN APPROVED SUBDIVISION; CLIFTON HILLS, WAKE COUNTY
I ~ / / I 6P ~ ~ , / 0~ 85 LF GUARDRAIL ~Q
, i`~ ~ w OR 3 HIGH WALL ~ ou 26 - ' 8. ZONING: PROPOSED R-4 5<NGLE FAMILY
I pr1 - i 100 YR FLOOD 9 INSIDE CITY LIMITS: STORAGE BNDY pFNnl~l, ~yp1E~,gTION
I v ~ ~ ! / ~ I N/F M. KIM AND STEVEN L. F:ICHARDSON ~ ~ , ' m _ ~ OB 6625 PG 265 i 10. INSIDE PRIMARY FIRE DISTRICT: NO INDEX
40.00' a _ ~ 0J /W ~ 1 ai CE-1 SUBDNISION PLAN
! hQ I ; ~ I 11, INSIDE FALLS, PERRY CREEK, OR SWIFT CREEK DRAINAGE AREA: NO CE-2 RINGLAND ROAD P8tP
~ ~ l0 5 I _ / ~ o I 14 , 12. INSIDE FLOOD HAZARD BOUNDARY: NO CE-3 EROSION CONTROL PLAN
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 30660 SF 1' CE-4 OUTFACE A & B, STUB ROAD
_ rn o 21304 SF \ / , 13. FLOOR AREA RATIO: N/A X-1 CROSS SECTIONS 10+00-13+00
~ o ~ ~ BFE 3 / \ ~ ~ , ~ / I 14. OMIT X-2 CROSS SECTIONS 13+60-17+00 X-3 CROSS SECTIONS 17+50-19+50
i ~ Z i ~ i / ~ • . /
, / i / - / / LOT LINE (TYP.) 15. DEDICATED GREENWAY: NONE DTL-1 STREET DETAILS DTL-2 UTILITY DETAILS
i / ~ . 16. DEVELOPER; STONEHAVEN LLC, 7200 STONEHENGE DR. #306, RALEIGH NC 27603, PH. 919-870-1262 DTL-3 EROSION CONTROL DETAILS
/ ~ . / ~ / / . j~ 17. DB 2877 PAGE 0624 ~
/ ~ , ~ ~ I
U~.
I ~ S 81'5 0 ~ N/F KEV G, PEREZ \ $ n 0 I 6 E 0 / DB 42 PG 707 Z NCDENR-DWO REVISION
g 6 8.03 0 / 3 I ~ 0 - i DELETE LOT #6 8/21/01
1 ti° o ~ / / , o ~ y ~ EX. 12 PUBLIC SS 0 , ~ f ~ ~ ~r i
/ - ~ 13 NCDENR-DWQ REVISIONS 7/z5/D1 . ~ 0
/ 50 UFFER . ~ r~ ~ ~ ~n ~ R W R/W ~ / Q 1 COR COMMENTS s/e/D1
\ g2~2 ~ J 4 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ZONE 2 a~,~ ~ J i 10964 SF ~ 45' WITH SIDEWALK 40' WITHOUT SIDEWALK Z
/ \ N GAIL E B^ SM ~ 2 / ~ RIGHT OF WAY Z No. Revi I n ue Date so /ss
~ DB 7832 G B J-- - ~ / , / ZONE 1 I ~ 0
i / 1.0' 5.0 3.5 26.0 3.5 - TT~ ROADWAY ~ ~ Jdi.IV
\ TOP BANK ~ - SIDEWALK UTILITY STRIP MIN, W ~ TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERS AND SITE PLANNERS 2.5' 10.5 10.5 2.5 0 16 Chancery Place, Durham NC 27707
/ 1 / ~ / N ! 12 ~'-1 I I / \ 2:1 MAX. LL Phone or Fax [phone]
~ / ~ ~ R35.OD I TOP BANK ~ 836 SF / / \ Email preecottddOmindep~ng.com
/ ~ I i N N 7 ~ I ~ F Inum ~~~111 n~a~i
/ ~ ^1 i r ~ \ ZONE 1 ~S ~ ~ / ~ l i Z N + / 0 C ARO ~y PAV M NT D SI N ~ ~ Z ~ / ~~i E E 45 40 RIGHT OF WAY
i ~ / _ , , 19065 SF . • - i 0 .•pFESSlpN•.•~.
\ / ~ o - / I\ - , ' h N 7~ONE 2 ~ 6'~ A.B.C.--40' ROW SECTION t ~ 26 ROADWAY SECTION - SEAL ~ -
~ / N _ 50 BUFFER'r • • , . ~ • ' 37,50 ~ ~ DBF3W81~ 50FRITTER 8 A.B.C.--45 ROW SECTION 22508
52 i ~ OWN OF 1 4" PER ~
N I \ 36. ~ NOT :NORMAL CR / i •'•.F ~ •.NGINE~;.• • FOOT UNLESS OTHERWISE DIRECTED ~4~~ F~
Z.~ 1 ~ i / 3 11 \ \ ITY ENGINEER. ~i7gN R~ ~a BY C P . Ilia
- ~ ~ ~ N/F MICHAEL P. SAVILLE / 111111/1
~ De 764s Pc 361 ~ S ~ ~ \11077 SF ~o, I ~i - / Project Nome and Address
I 8 o \
\ 1 5 _ _ 65• 6 r I
11178 SF / ~ / / (
- ( 1~ 10 i ~ ~ 9 ~ \ I ~ UTILITY INSTALLATIONS AND OTHER PUBLIC
! 11214 SF ~ 11426 SF / I „ FACILITIES, INCLUDING SIDEWALKS AND HANDICAP 8200 KNEBWORTH COURT
- _ i / ~ - 30 STD. CONC. C&G RAMPS ARE TO BE CONSTRUCTED ON ALL STREETS
/ N/F JAMES M. BRANNON / - / ~ DB 4713 PG 667 ~ ~ AS SPECIFIED BY CITY CODE. THESE FACILITIES CITY OF RALEIGH HAVE BEEN APPROVED BY THE CITY OF RALEIGH WAKE COUNTY
r , ~ 5.13 RIGHT-OF-WAY (TYP.) AND SHALL BE SO INSTALLED UNLESS A CHANGE NORTH CAROLINA
I \ I N/F EDWARJYJ. UNGEMACH N $3'03' ~ \ ~ DB 7450 G 836 54 W IS AUTHORIZED BY WRITTEN APPROVAL. PUBLIC
\ I SANITARY SEWER EASEMENTS ARE TO BE RECORDED
I / N KENNETH B. LAWSON JR. 1 PRIOR TO FINAL ACCEPTANCE. SIGNATURE; Drowfng sheet
DB 7831 PG 190 N/F CATHERINE M. K15ER 1 I , DB 7623 PG 9485
N/F CHARLES E. BUCHANA \ ( / DB 6352 PG 700 SUBDIVISION
~ \ I ~ / CHIEF ENGINEER Date PLAN
~ \ ~ / ` \ 5.~ 1 DIR. OF PUBLIC UTILITIES
TOA CCIf~ CAIl~IAICC? $C!)e ~
IRMFFI, Lruiv F-r=rl lrr~5V'
CONSERVATION ENGINEER
0 50 100 150 200

;2) 60 I F+ 60" CMP 1.2% SI OPF WITH CI #1 STA. 14+8233, 13.50' LT OFFSET 11
MASONRY I ICADWALL ANC TAILWALL DA=0.50 AC 110=7.22 C=.60 25 LFt 15 RCP ®0.50% SLOPE TA. 14+62, 65 DEG. SKEW W/ CHANNEL Q10=CIA=2.20 CFS, INV OUT=366,50 Q10=2.2 CFS, HW= ,
F-HYD ASSY N KLF LK I U NC UU I HW & I W UL I AIL TOP=373.27 CI 2 STA.14+8 ' HYD ASS'Y W/ 6" GV & BOX
FOP 60" RCP PIPE AND MASONR" T # 2.33,13.50 RT 6X6 TEE W/ BL CON SR. DA=0.28AC 110=7.22 C= 6 TEE W/ BLOCKING ° C U
1 o.ao INV. IN 364.80, INV. OUT 364.10 _ MH 5 STA. 15• O j #5 STA. 15+08.89 L a
Q10-1.6CFS+Q10 CI 1 -3 82 # Q10-115 CFS, d10-1.6 FT V10-10 FP ( ' S TOP=373.271NV = 6 RIGHT OFFSE RIGHT OFFSET N y UTILITY NOTES
03100=228 CFS, 4100=2.4 FT, V100=12.5 FPS IN 366.38 INV OUT=366.18 o
25 LFt 15" RCI LFt 15" RCP ®8.70% SLOPE Q10=3.82 d10= = E ~ 1.ALL MATERIALS AND METHODS OF CONSTRUCTION ~ 0.35 ,V10 10FPS ~ SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE
EX. 30" STD. C&G INV OUT ®TAIL OUT ®TAILWALL=364.00, FROM NYDOT CHT, ZONE 2, USE R WITH THE CITY OF
8'L.X4'W.X18"TH. MH #4 STA. 13+15.64 I ~ , .X4'W.X18" ' ' y o ALEIGH AND THE STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA TH. FLAT CL B RIP-RAP APRON ON 4 FILTER STONE STANDARDS AND SPECIFICATIONS.
6 RIGHT OFFSET ~ N ~ ~y I 0 2.CONTRACTOR SHALL HAVE NORTH CAROLINA ONE ~ _ , V 100 YR FLOOD STORAGE EL. 370.3 ~ E CALL (1-B00-632-4949 LOCATE ALL EXIST
~ 1 1 0• i~ y o ) ING - UTILITIES PRIOR TO BEGINNING CONSTRUCTION.
• U ~ 9 'd~. I ~ • ~•I ~ ~ ~ ti J s , I , 1 ~ „ = 0 3. THE CONSTRUCTION CON TRACTOR RESPONSIBLE ~ A ! ! (2) 145 LFf 60 RCP ®0.90% SLOPE ~ " FDR THE EXTENSI
MH #3 STA. 11+83 ~ ~ R~pP ~ r~ ~ ~ ~ ~P ~ ~ . ~ ~ i ~ ~ ~ qR~q I a_ ON Of WATER AND SEWER, AS WITH MASONRY HEADWALL AND TAILWALL o APPROVED IN THESE PLANS, IS RESPONSIBLE FOR
6 RIGHT OFFSET p ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ \ ~ r~ r`FER N ' z ~ o °L ~ ~ ~ ~ Y I y.C 2 I !~r STA. 17+ - y CONTACTING THE CENTRAL ENGINEERING DEP I • 40, 46 DEG. SKEW W/ CHANNEL E - ARTMENT
PI ST =11±83.62 ~ ! ~ ~ X9.0 ~ "I • ~~m -F- ~ R „ _ ! ~ 11 1 e i ~ 9 1 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~;m 1~ I ~ • REF v ~ AT 831 6810, AND THE PUBLIC UTILITIES ~ ER TO NCDOT HW DETAIL FOR 60 RCP y a~ DEPARTMENT AT 890-3400 AT LEAST TWENTY FO
EX RINGLAND DRIVEWAY ~ 1=12.0138 R I ~ ' ~ ~ r ~ o ~'o ~ I AND MASONRY HEADWALL C HouRS UR ~ ~ ONSTRUCTION. cn ~ a PRIOR TO BEGINNING ANY OF THEIR
~ C> ! I o~ I .d . SHALL BE MAINTAINED ~ ; I I ~ .y la ~q ~ ~ INV. IN 366.30, INV. OUT 365.00 c CONSTRUCTION.
THROUGH CONSTRUCTION ~ ' 1 • ~ ~ 9~~ ~ I - ~ ~ - `r s ~ ~ ~ ~ a . /J o, , 38.14 5~ ~ r ~ ~ R!P FOR USE BY NEIGHBOR. , . ; ~ j ~ ~ ~ l q S ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Q10=125 F - - ~ 4. FAILURE TO NOTIFY BOTH CITY DEPARTMENTS IN J 0, ~ C S, d10-1.9 FT, V10-9.5 FPS 'y t ' Rlp ~ ~ 1 _ _ _ ~ c ADVANCE OF BEGINNING CONSTRUCTION, WILL RESULT
. X38? 6 33~ I ~ ~ R o.o Q , ~ auF qN. - ~ ~ - ~ e A AN ~ ~ Q100-248, 4100-2.7, V100-11 .o_ ~ IN THE ISSUANCE OF MONETARY FINES AND RE UIRE OF f I J w c° Q R I m ~ ~ REINSTALLATION OF ANY WATER OR SEWER FACILITIES
~ ~ ~ I ~ ~ fR 11 ~ ~ ` k , ,6, II ' =1 ~ j , ~ ~ ~ ~ c x ~ NOT INSPECTED AS A RESULT OF THIS NOTIFICATION
30 STD. C&G (TYP. . ~ ; ~ ~ 1 ' i i - o. ~ ~ x ti ~ ~ j ~ ' X n- ° o ~ FAILURE. ~ ~ ~ a 5. FAILURE TO CALL FOR INSPECTION INSTALL A
154 LF KEYSTONE ~C / ~ L=3 • • • ~ i N o ~i o00 ~ ~ ~ i - cy ' ~ i o ° ~ DOWNSTREAM PLUG, HAVE PERMITTED PLANS ON THE
~ . ~ o o ~ RETAINING WALL ~ =3 .4~. ~ i ooa ~ ' • = ~ ° y JOBSITE OR ANY c L ~ OTHER VIOLATION OF THE CITY OF
~ • i .g o ~ ~ 11 ~ ~ ~ 0.83 ~ ~ ~ o ~ \ ~ I ~ ° i o RALEIGH STANDARDS WILL RESULT IN A FINE AND ,1 ~0~ ~ ' 3 o E o POSSIBLE EXLUSION FROM FUTURE W d ~ ORK IN THE CITY
6 1 T I I O . 9 ? I o0 1 D, WA , ERL!e~ ~ e ~ 2 ~ 6' ~ M=0 83 ~6 oo 1 • `tip ~ * rn ccw. OF RALEIGH.
i'" S 39 m ~ °oo ° i ~ I o ~ ! `L . ~ o. cuNTKn~iGR SnHU r~rtiFY THE LOCATION AND iF k ~ o. DEPTH OF ALL EXISTING UTILITIES AND NOTIFY THE
_ \ , o ~ MH 2 STA. 10+83 ~ ~ ob o N o0 .°'c+ y ~ ENGINEER OF ANY DISCREPANCIES OR CONFUCTS
• M ~o o J - 6 RIGHT OFFSET ~ oo ~ ~ c c PRIOR TO BEGINNING CONSTRUCTION. oo° ~ ~ E 7. CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE THE LOCATION
,1 ~ i c9 ~ ~ ~ ' ! , y ~ ~ ~ OF THE ELECTRIC, OPTICAL, AND TELEPHONE SERVICE
~P ~ 1 ~ • • . , , ~ c ` WITH THE APPROP ~ ~ ° o ~ RIATE UTIUTY COMPANY PRIOR TO y _ c ~ BEGINNING CONSTRUCTION. CONTRACTOR SHALL
F ~ ~ ° ~ E PROVIDE CONFLUTS AS REQUIRED FOR THESE / ~ ~ py _
1 ~ ~ ' / I ~ ~ ~ r Loy o ~ UTILITIES UNDER PAVED AREAS.
~ 7 21 ~ o ~ \ ° 1' o_ 0 8. THIS PLAN IS DIAGRAMMA ~ NOT RELEASED FOR CONSTRUC E Y ~ ~ TIC AND REPRESENTS ~ b ~ TION _ o ? a THE APRROXIMATE LOCATION OF UTILITI
~ ~ ~ 5 a ~ ; \ •o ° L° L SPECIFIC ES UNLESS I, r y ~ ALLY DIMENSIONED. THE CONTRACT
/ ~ ~ ~ ~ COORDINATE T OR SHALL ~ \ 9 r / c a~~ c HE ACTUAL AND PROPOSED LOCATION 0 0 o OF UTILITIES TD AVOID CONFLICTS.
R .I \ l ~ ~ - ~ RIP ~ ~ r ~ ~ \ ~ ~ o ~ ~ ~ 9. REFER TO DWG. N0. XXXXX FOR UTILITY
• . Ar C? i• ~ FER ~ ~ . , ~ i \ i 2.U a,~ o o ~ CONSTRUCTION DETAILS. \ , o,~ - ~L c 10. CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL WATER AND SE
6~' ~ T=2 ` 6 , • '•,9 0. ~ a H ~ I o ~ ~ / ~ ~ EX 5 CONC SIDEWALK ~ , I ~ R 50. 'Q ~ WER ti ~ ~ ~ ~ a ~ o LATERAL SERVICES AND SHALL SET THE WATER BOX
~ 'Y I , ~ I 1 E ~ 1 l I \ ~ 1 ~ ~ AND METER.
11 ` ti =46.35 I ~o ~ ~ • ~ 30 V ALLEY C&G o, ~ o C=46.1 I R~ ti ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
I g ti ~ ~ , ~
~ O 1 ~ E=1. ~ , 8X6 TAPPING SLEEVE ~ -
8" GV W BOX - ~ ~ I - .79 I _ ~ _ o 0 / / ~ o ~ 11 ~ ~ I ; ~ ~ ~ o0 00 0 ~ c~
6 GV W BOX ~ . ~ I, ~ ~ ° ;'_I , ~ ~ MH 6 STA. 18+ ; # 89.74 ° ,
~ ~ oo b 1 6' RIGHT ya ~ OFFSET
EX. SS MH #1 ~ - 9 I ~ c o . ~ rn - ~NYDOT OR 2 ~Cl f'If 1 1 0 ~ e~ i,~dt' ~ ~ - ~ STA. 3+93.67 OUTFACE 'A' o ~ \
STA. 9+9 . O C (C ULVCr~TS ~ { ~ o o ~ ~ - ~ Q10 , 3?~1,2~ CFS, V10 10 FPS, ZONE 3 oo I ~ E~
3 RT. OFFSET O s ) oo b° - O- ~ IGi'/ A$ONR HEADV~ALL AN TAILWALL •h~V ° ' TOP 387.45 _ - ~,,p,~ ~ - ~o MH #8 STA. 3+53.88
~ y < ~ ~ M IPLE. C,.ULVE~R : USE D=1.25* =6.25 FT ~ ~ lP ~ ~ . „ 5 '0"/ .001 2 OUTFACE 'A' °
~ ~ ~ ` US ' b ' L. 25' W. X 36 1, R/ qR m~ INSTALL HC RAMP IN EX - - • - - D• ~ ~qN ~ ° of
~ ~ _ F-- - , CL SS 1 RIP-RAP APRON f SIDEWALK, SAW CUT ONE ; ~ 9 ~ _ ~ ° ~ CI 3 STA. 18+72.81 57.64' a # RT OFFSET
JOINT 2 ~ - `M~1X.. STONE S~~ - O 200 I R... I , / ~ i I 9 _ BEYOND AREA REQ D _ •~c I, ~ - _ ~ ~ _ CDIgN,~,T C DIAM TCR - 2~ ~ ~ ~ ~ DA=0.36 AC,110=7.22, C=.85 ~ ~
AND USE EXPANSION JTS ~ ~ ~ i ~ - Q10=CIA=2.21 CFS ~ /i ° ~ ~1 y ~
~ i ~ - _ E
EX WTR, VERIFY SIZE & DEPTH ~ • ~ I ~ , y CJ v 50 LFf 15" RCP ®4% SLOPE WITH FES, INV. OUT=365.00 v'i °'o
~ ~ ~ - r".- '1 F ~ Q F-HYD ASSY W 6 0 ~ ~ ~ _ ~ ~ / GV & BOX ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Q10=2.2 CFS, d10=0.3', V10=6 FPS, FROM NYDCT CHT: c a
o 0 ~ ~ ~F ° 4- USE FLAT CL.'B' RIP-RAP APRON 6'L.X4'W.X18"TH., STONE D=6" °r I
1 j,~ \ 1 1 V 11 I / ~1 . \ \ ~ \ v I EX 3 Dc ~ ~ o " 0 STD CONC C&G ~ I ! / r
• ~ / ~ ~ • ' ~ g~F r !66.5 , ~ X 66.5' i 90 LF 4 FLAT BOTTOM DITCH ®0.90% SLOPE W/ 6:1 SIDE: SLOPES MAX. m w ~ °
1 ~ja ~ 'Fp ~ EX F-HYD ASSY / • .a . ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ° ~ ~ Q10=125, d10=2.0 , V10=3.8 FPS, PERM. SEED AND TACK W STRAW MAT ~ o X ~ 1 / ~ y y
n 1 ~
~o 0 EX MH 37 STA. 1+00 ~ o y
0 0 0 N OUTFACE 'A' N c o H ? o~ c ` ~ a~.~
a~ ~Ea m
o ao " o VPI ST 11+50 mo ~ ~ m VPI EL ~ ° 3 c c U o
II y 395.00 a m Q J N i (O tv`U - F- lD ~a
w ~ N RVE EN-26 y 395 ~ = o t h y ~ C C
(!r °coi° E
O m + z F O o0 J ~ m ~ ~ 00 r • - ~ + i~ i~ 3~1~ y ~vv a
\ N _ N 00 v ~ ~ aci o y C
~ ~ M ~ ~ ~ ~ II II ~ ~ M m v N cOC E o ~
390 ~ W ~ o ~ o L O y ° O °f ~ O
N ~ N ~ cV 00 ~ mo a RNtu \ 00 00 ~ 'a~ E o ? n.
661 O ~ U y noa I~ c0 'o APPROXIM TE LOCATION 6 , n- d ~ ~'1ca d• sr ~ ~ y mm m 3`~0 ~r~ Q:~.° Q,y m N Om G ~ C °7 ~ C
OF EX. " WA ~ ~ > a nn~ N ~ ~ N ~ =z~ TERLINE _ > Q n ~m O C= O
U w = mmF Q M~ Q r~ ~ # a"° VERIFY SIZ AND DEPTH i _ J f =z~ ~ O ~ r II O = o» = w z ~ . a cn p N ~ o ~ ~ F tlI 2 Z~ ~ ° ~ y No. Revision/Issue Date
I ~ M INTAIN P ° a r. II II rn 385 OSITIV GR DIENT ~ ~ °Z> a "a ~ ~ f ..0 0
ON W TERLIN m A - o > ~o > U f- ? Z O O ~t ~ ~ 2Z ~-.'r~ U~ U D MM TTTTT T,~
~9 + Nj 3~~5 TRANSPORTATION ENgNEERS AND SIZE PLANNERS
II ~ r UTILITY INSTALLATIONS AND OTHER PUBLIC 16 Chancery Place, Durham NC 27707
• I ~ N I`1 o USE ~ ~ ~ > ~ ps TANDARD VERTI AL BEND TO II II w I I + ~ ~ PROVID 12 MIN. CLR, /L OVER RCP. N Q ~ w FACILITIES, INCLUDING SIDEWALKS AND HANDICAP Phone or Fax [phone] ~ RAMPS ARE TO Emo~l preecottddOmindap~ing.com
o ~ ENCASE W/L IN REINFO CED CONCRETE ~ c~n W BE CONSTRUCTED ON ALL STREETS ii, of AS SPECIFIED BY CITY CODE. THESE FACILITIES as nh
380 I I + u ~ ~ ~ ~ ao C A HAVE BEEN APPROVED BY THE CITY OF RO y + I RALEIGH ~ ,
o. v~i w > ao I AND SHALL BE SO IN p ' Essl ~ ~ ~ ~ STALLED UNLESS A CHANGE . of o . ~
it Q IS AUTHORIZED BY W I QQ N~ 9' II R TTEN APPROVAL. PUBLIC < . $ ~ SANITARY SEWER EASEMENTS ARE TO BE RECORDED SEAL
o ~ ~ ~ r` VPI ST 16+00 98 LF N VPI E! 75.00 N PRIOR TO FINAL ACCEPTANCE. 22508 _
PE ~ ~ z ~ CURVE: EN=60 SIGNATUR ~ ~ D_ E.
375 o + ~ O '•.E'NC EEt~.~ W 6~ . ~N .
12 , w 1. • CHIEF ENGINEER N P , ,
9 o~ ~ J W - - cilllliiii
8~ ~ Q cn w '17359 DIR. OF PUBLIC UTILITI - Project Name °nd Address
Z o ~ S ~ ~
0 a ~ " S 370 ° ~ ~ ~ \ • ~ z ~ ~ a S _ ~ - TRAFFIC ENGINEE z~ .
~ a v Z m ~ • ~ ~ , / ~ CONSERVATION ENGINEER
Z y ~ > > ~ ~Op 12" MIN, CLR, TO R ~ „ m ~ ° Z 5 F ~ VALE - 3 .58-
o_ > _ = z ~ > > CURVE EN-240 + + o 8200 KNEBWORTH COURT CITY OF RALEIGH
J z a " " ? 12"CLR. TO REINFORCE N `t ~ 365 Q w W° W D ~ ~ > ONCRETE CASI G OF DI SS II II M WAKE COUNTY
Q II Q II Jm USE STD VERTICAL END ~ NORTH CAROLINA .~65
W ~ W fA W RCP OVER WATERLIN
W U U U ~ I-- z a /
J w 191 LF 811 ~o DISS®1
360 wa .o~; sLO 11 ~ E 381 F 8 NOT RELEASED FOR CONST P~°'°~ Sheet RUCTION
o DI SS 0.4~ SL OP w
0 a O O ~ 00 d' N7 ~ ~ ~ c0 O ~ c0 U W ~ ~ ~ ~ O In O ~ N~ O~ ~ 00 O 360 STONEHAVEN
rn O O N 0'1 z) ~ N ~ r~ I'7 ~ 0) O I'7 ~ 0p ~ ~ ~ M °ate PLAN ~ ~ oo ~ o Ln o r ~ o
z O In ~ M N r- ~ ~ ~ ~ 00 ~ ~ 00 ~ O ~ O c~J O O 00 co ~ I~ O N ~ ~ d' 00 P7 O . OO ~n N ~ c0 O ~ ~ &
_ _ ~ ~ O cXl (Y'1 rn rn rn rn r ~ rn rn m ~,r, ,v, 1. _ _ ~ N d" ~ ~ ~ d- ~ M M rl M rn nl m n i ~ r.. ~ , n _ _ . Scele -
f~ ~ `v f'[-AN: 1;;=50 n rKVFILE
w d M i) M M M i~ M M M M ~ M ~ M ~ M ~ M ~ M ~ M ~ M PROFILE: 1 =50, HORIZ. 1 =50' T=on
~ 3~5 „ , 1 = 5 VERT.
0 50 100 150 200
-j7-t~
. r

EXISTING RINGLAND ROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY
SHOWN AS HATCHED AREA PER WAKE CO. MAP
o GENERAL NOTES c
I ~ 1. BOUNDARY INFORMATION WAS TAKEN FROM A
m MAP PREPARED BY PEACOCK LAND SURVEYING,
I I BENSON, NC, 27504, MAP N0. 99-0816-C, AND KNEBWOR H tr REPRODUCED BY S.D. PUCKETT ASSOCIATES,
I ~ DURHAM NC. EXISTING IRON PINS WERE FIELD
o ~ CHECKED AND SHALL BE PROPERLY INDICATED ON
Q ~ THE FINAL PUT. q o 2. CITY OF RALEIGH SUED?VISION /5-44-Ot
3. STREET TOPOGRAPHY WAS OBTAINED BY AN o' ACTUAL FIELD SURVEY BY S.D. PUCKETT
I Q ASSOCIATES, DURHAM NC.
I i I ~ 4. DOWNSTREAM SS MN EXISTING INFORMATION
I i HOWARD RD WAS APPROXIMATED; ACTUAI ELEVATION OF EXISTING INVERT AND PIPE SIZE TO BE FIELD
VERIFIED. = 5. ANY LAND SUBJECTED TO INCLREASED WATER
50' RIPARIAN BUFFER w LEVELS SHALL BE DESIGNATED AS "FLOOD
~ I I Q STORAGE AREAS" AND DELINEATED AND RECORDED IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 10-3057 OF THE ~ CITY CODE.
~ 6. LOT DIMENSIONS ARE APPROXIMATE.
I I ~ I ~ 7, A CONDITION OF APPROVAL OF THIS PLAN WILL 45' W. X 40' D. FOOTPRINT (TYP.) ~ BE THAT THE OWNER SUBMIT
~ I A PETITION FOR ANNEXATION AFTER THE APPROVAL OF THE
~ I _ PRELIMINARY PUN, AND RIOR TO RECORDING OF
~J ~ I Q: LOT OR ISSUANCE OF ANY CONSTRUCTION PERMITS. 20' PUBLIC SS EASEMENT CONTACT KAREN DUKE 0 890-3656.
4 VICINITY htAP n.t.s. B. NEUSE RIVER TRIBUTARIES EXIST ON THE
Q PROPERTY. APPLICATION FOR PERMIT TO CROSS TWO NRBR STREAMS (SECTION 401) IS MADE TO
m I NCOENR-DWQ. PERMIT PENDING.
I ~m I I 9. THE SITE HAS BEEN INVESTIGATED FOR THE PRESENCE OF WETLANDS BY COOPER
~ ENVIRONMENTAL, INC., 2300 SARDIS ROAD NORTH
I ~ i SUITE Q, CHARLOTTE NC 28227. PHONE
N 704.645.2000. NO SECTION 404 WETUNDS EXIST BEYOND TOP OF BANK, AS INDICATED.
10. CURRENT PROPERTY OWNER: KARAM, MICHAEL
r• ~ ,p Q. do MARY, 82 'v ~ 11. THE BUILDING CONTRACTOR SHALL BE
~ RESPONSIBLE TO VERIFY ALL BUILDING SETBACK
~ ~ 1 . REQUIREMENTS WITH THE INSPECTIONS DEPARTMENT. 12. COUNTOURS, SOILS AND PLANIMETRICS SHOWN
Z ' ARE FROM WAKE COUNTY MAPS ANO ARE
4 . ~ SUMMARY APPROXIMATE. 13. ALL LOTS TO BE RECORDED AT ONCE, NO
• / / PHASING IS PROPOSED.
1. TOTAL AREA: 6.39 ACRES 14. IMPERVIOUS SURFACE ENCROACHMENT INTO ~ ZONE 2 FOR LOTS ~?5 AND {t6 SHALL BE
2. TOTAL NUMBER OF LOTS: 16 EA PERMITTED BY MEANS OF A MINOR VARIANCE
3 16 ISSUED BY THE DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
3. WAKE COUNTY P.I.N.: 0797.05-19-0179 PROVIDED RESTRICTIVE COVENANT BE DEEDED WITH THE RESULTING SAID LOTS STATED AS FOLLOWS:
. ~ • 4. DENSITY: 2.5 UNITS PER ACRE "ROOF DRAINAGE DISCHARGE POINTS FOR GUTTER
J , DOWNSPOUTS SHALL BE LOCATED OUTSIDE OF THE 5. STREET RIGHT-OF-WAY: 1.1 AC NEUSE RIVER RIPARIAN BUFFER, ROOF DESIGN
SHALL BE PROVIDED TO ENSURE THAT THE
• ~ • _ ~ 6. MINIMUM /AVERAGE LOT SIZE: 10890 SF / 14390 SF LOCATION OF GUTTER DOWNSPOUTS IS LOCATED OUTSIDE OF THE SAID BUFFER, AS TYPIFIED BY
0~ 15 / ~ ~ p ~ . , MINIMUM LOT WIDTH 65 F" POINTS LIBELLED 'G' ON DRAWING NO. CE-1 FOR
~ ~ MINIMUM CORNER LOT WIDTH 80 F STONEHAVEN SUBDIVISION BY THE PRESCOTT
~ MINIMUM LOT DEPTH 100 I COMPANY.'
0 p NOTE: MODIFIED REQUIRED SETBACKS
I 0 ° ° o o I ` TYP. F-PRINT FRONT YARD 20'FT, REnR YARD 30 FT, AGGREGATE 40 F" SIDE YARD 10 FT, CORNER SIDE YARD 20 FT, AGGREGATE20 FT
J ~ _ ~ °o I ~c ~ ~ 7, PART OF AN APPROVED SUBDIVISION: CLIFTON HILLS, WAKE COUNTY
~ 1~
`/AAA/ J ` .t w. V ~ ti ~ ~ _ i 8, tt7NiNG; PROPOSED R 4 SINGLE FAMILY
1 CO YR FL,~QD
, ~e1 - AGE BNDY 9. " IDS CITY UNITS' ~ PENDING ANNEXATION TOR 10. INSIDE PRIMARY FIRE DISTRICT: ~ NO
rte,
~ - ~ 11. INSIDE FALLS, PERRY CREEK, OR SWIFT CREEK DRNNAGE AREA: ~ NO " I
• 12. INSIDE FLOOD HAZARD BOUNDARY: NO

ZONE 2 IMPACT=548 SF REFER TO NOTE #14, • 1 J. FLOOR AREA RATIO: N A / INDD(
14. DEDICATED STREET RIGHT OF WAY: XXXX AC CE-1 SUBDNISKMI PLAN
ZONE 2 IMPACT=676 SF , CE-2 STONEMAVEN CRCLE P&f
REFER TO NOTE 14, LOT LINE TYP. 15. DEDICATED GREENWAY: NONE ( ~ CE-3 EROSION CONTROL PLAN
~ 16. DEVELOPER: STONEHAVEN LLC, 7200 STONEHENGE DR. (J306, RALFI NC 27603 PH, 919- - CE-4 SANITARY SEWER OUTFALL "A" I 870 1262
` / 14 20' PUBLIC SS x•1 CROSS SECTIONS 10+00.13+00 17. DB 2877 PAGE 0624 X-2 GROSS SEGTIONS 13+60-17+
/ QO x•3 cROSS sECnoNS 17+50.19+50
~ ~ - _ 0 DTL-1 STREET DETAILS
~ -'i 0 0 Z DTL-2 UTILITY DETAILS
p po o _Q DTL-3 EROSION CONTROL DETAILS
pp . ~ EX. 12 PUBLIC SS p • I'
~ • V NCDENR-DW ~ ~ Q REVISIONS /25/D1
50 OFFER • R W ~~W !Y
~ ZONE 2 t 3 Q 1 COR COMMENT s 45 WITH SIDEWALK 40 WITHOUT SIDEWALK 5 /8/Di
` Z RIGHT OF NAY . '1'
~ No. Revision/Issue Date
ZONE1 t.o' 5.0' 3.5' 26.0 3.5 U
T ANK . ~ ~ ~ OP B sroewAlx unuTr s>RIP RoAnwAY ~ Tl'~ T .r r_ 2.5' 10.5' 10.5' 2.5' W ~ TRANSPORTA110N ENGINEERS A1+D SRE PLAI~prERS
Q 18 pat>owy Pkia, Dufiam NC 27707
~ ~ TOP BANK ` 2: ~ Ma U, Photo or Fax [phone] ~ EmoM
12 P^~P8n9.cam I-
~ ~ 20NE 1 ~ CAR PAVEMENT DESIGN ~ ~ Z t~.,..,.,, o~ ~
~ ~ 4 4 I T F T~ s H W S " _ SEE DE.AIL aX (TYP.) ~°;.~oEE 'o~,•;y
2 1 2 ~ . Q . 9
~ ONE 2 WAY TION 6 A.B.C. SEAL
50 BUFFERT • . , , 22508
NOTE NORMAL CROWN OF 1/4 PER I~ TQiF. PAVEMENT. DESIGN SHALL BkgS H W ~'•fNC E~~•'~ $ 0 N, OR AS iN, F
FOOT UNLESS OTHERWISE DIRECTED CALCULATED ACCORDING T i ~ SPECIFICATIONS, qN p, R
~ ~ 7 11 BY CITY ENGINEER. WHICHEVER IS GREATER.
PmJect Name and Addnm
8
10
9 UTILITY INSTALlAT10 OTHER PUBLIC
~ FACILITIES MICLUDI N IDEWALKS AND HANDICAP
30" STD. CONC. C&G RAEIPS ARE TO BE 8200 KNEBWORTH COURT STRUCTED ON ALL STREETS
s / AS SPECIFIEI BY CI ODE. THESE FACILITIES CITY OF RALEIGH HAVE BEEN r1PPROV 8Y THE CITY OF RALEIGH WAi~ COUMY
RIGHT-OF-WAY (TYP.) AND SHA LL BE SO I UNLESS A CHANGE NORTH CAROLINA
\ ~ _ IS AUTHORafD BY APPROVAL. PUBLIC
SANITARY SEER NTS ARE TO BE RECORDED NOTE: MODIFIED TYP. F-PRINT PRIOR TO FNIAI Ar
I ..C ANCE.
TURF: ^9 Sheet
~ 1 ~ ~ SUBDIVISION
~ I I NOTE: MODIFIED TYP. F-PRINT CFpEF ENG~E.l3~._.
°ati PLAN DIR. OF PUBIC U'ILI
TRAFFIC Et"EER S°°"
CONSERVATION ENGINE
0 50 150 200
man&
k
I r

EXISTING RINGLAND ROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY
SHOWN AS HATCHED AREA PER WAKE CO. MAP
KEYSTONE RETAINING WALL GENERAL NOTES 0
a
~ 1. BOUNDARY INFORMATION WAS TAKEN FROM A m MAP PREPARED BY PEACOCK LAND SURVEYING,
o BENSON, NC, 27504, MAP N0. 99-0816-C, AND
KNEBWOR H a! REPRODUCED BY S.D. PUCKETT ASSOCIATES, ~ DURHAM NC. EXISTING IRON PINS WERE FIELD
o CHECKED AND SHALL BE PROPERLY INDICATED ON
Q ~ THE FINAL PLAT. -
0 0 2. CITY OF RALEIGH SUBDIVISION #5-44 01 o! w 3. STREET TOPOGRAPHY WAS OBTAINED BY AN
} ~ ACTUAL FIELD SURVEY BY S.D. PUCKETT
Q ASSOCIATES, DURHAM NC. ~ 4. DOWNSTREAM SS MH EXISTING INFORMATION
HOWARD RD WAS APPROXIMATED; ACTUAL ELEVATION OF
ROAD CROSSING #1 EXISTING INVERT AND PIPE SIZE TO BE FIELD NEUSE RIVER RULE IMPACT SUMMARY VERIFIED.
STREAM IMPACT LENGTH= 141 LF ALONG CENTERLINE z 5. ANY LAND SUBJECTED TO INCLREASED WATER
f r . i i 1 ~ 1 ( ) c.~ LEVELS SHALL BE DESIGNATED AS FLOOD ZONE 1 IMPACT AREA = 5851 SF w STORAGE AREAS" AND DELINEATED AND RECORDED
\ ~ ~ /i C ~ r ZONE 2 IMPACT AREA = 4129 SF a IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 10-3057 OF THE
v' \ 1 I ~ ~ / i ~ NOTE, AREAS INCLUDE FILL SLOPES/STONE ~ CITY CODE.
~ I I/ ~ C 6. LOT DIMENSIONS ARE APPROXIMATE. ~ 7. A CONDITION OF APPROVAL OF THIS PLAN WILL
` \ .o _ I ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ t BE THAT THE OWNER SUBMIT A PETITION FOR
~ ti \ 8~ ~ I~`. I J ~ Z~ I ~ ANNEXATION AFTER THE APPROVAL OF THE PRELIMINARY PLAN, AND RIOR TO RECORDING OF
Q ~Q ` 1~ ( ~ ROAD CROSSING #2 LOT OR ISSUANCE OF ANY CONSTRUCTION PERMITS.
N/F LOT 4, PHASE 3 1 Q PARKLYN WOODS S/D m' ~ ~ ~ NEUSE RIVER RULE IMPACT SUMMARY CONTACT KAREN DUKE ®890-3656.
73 4 I VICINITY MAP n.t.s. 8. NEUSE RIVER TRIBUTARIES EXIST ON THE STREAM IMPACT = 136 LF (ALONG CENTERLINE) PROPERTY. APPLICATION FOR PERMIT TO CROSS
m 4 E I ~ ~ ZONE 1 IMPACT AREA - 4062 SF TWO NRBR STREAMS (SECTION 401) IS MADE TO
15 67• \ ~ 1. S ' 3 ' ~ 1 1 PA T AR = NCDENR-DWQ. PERMIT PENDING. ZONE 2 IM C EA 2765 SF 9. THE SITE HAS BEEN INVESTIGATED FOR THE
I m ~ 8 38 8 4 I ~ ~ i ~ ~ ~ NOTE; AREAS INCLUDE FILL SLOPES STONE PRESENCE OF WETLANDS BY COOPER /
i ~ ~ , ENVIRONMENTAL, INC., 2300 SARDIS ROAD NORTH SUITE Q, CHARLOTTE NC 28227. PHONE
c~ w 4 4 i 704.845.2000. NO SECTION 404 WETLANDS EXIST
,a a E / 1 g • 68 ~ i~ , Q BEYOND TOP OF BANK, AS INDICATED. 10. CURRENT PROPERTY OWNER: KARAM, MICHAEL
\ ~ ~ ~~J s s1 , 81 O 18" ~ ~ - . ; 1~ N/F GERALD T. LUTZ Tz Q. & MARY, 82
• ~ ~ E 431. g' ~ ~ DB 4508 PG 484 O ~ 11. THE BUILDING CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE TO VERIFY ALL BUILDING SETBACK
~ \ _ ry ~ \ - ~ O~ SIDE N F T.P. RINGLAN REQUIREMENTS WITH THE INSPECTIONS DEPARTMENT.
W X24 . 1 12. COUNTOURS, SOILS AND PLANIMETRICS SHOWN ARE FROM WAKE COUNTY MAPS AND ARE
a 1 ~ •4 19256 SF \ \ ~ APPROXIMATE.
~ a 2 ~ A ~ ~ ~ I SUMMARY 13. ALL LOTS TO BE RECORDED AT ONCE. NO
1 Q,ZO SF c J, r r , ~ co \ 11250 SF <F~ ~ 3 / PHASING 15 PROPOSED. / 1. TOTAL AREA: 6.39 ACRES
- - ~ ~ 3 , ' 2 ' ~ ~ ~ 1261 SF rn ~ ` 2. TOTAL NUMBER OF LOTS: 15 EA
2 \ 0 0 FT 16 ~ ~ B - ~ SID o so . R ~ 0 BFE 369.5 A AR 3. WAKE COUNTY P.LN.: 0797.05-19-0179
D 1 , D S 326 S~ ~ o T \ w
L PUBLIC UTII O ~ - / ESMT 4. DENSITY: 2.35 UNITS PER ACRE
~a{ ~ / ~ ~ ~ / - _ 0.00 5. STREET RIGHT-OF-WAY: 1.1 AC
x ~ w
6, MINIMUM /AVERAGE LOT SIZE: 10890 SF / 15362 SF
~ 294 ' 0 ti 15 1 ~ ~ ~ ~ 1 17432 SF MINIMUM LOT WIDTH 65 Fi
°j BFE 370.3 N 84'25' 14" ~ ~ W 91.89' 0 ~ p oo MINIMUM CORNER LOT WIDTH 80 Fi MINIMUM LOT DEPTH 100 FT
9'21' 0~' 0 , REQUIRED SETBACKS
FRONT YARD 20 FT, REAR YARD 30 FT, AGGREGATE 40 Ff
I o0o Q.ti ~ oo ~ 5 CONC. SW Q / I ~ SIDE YARD 10 FT, CORNER SIDE YARD 20 FT, AGGREGATE 20 FT
. _ I ~ ~4 ~ 1 - ' ~ ~ / 7, PART OF AN APPROVED SUBDIVISION: CLIFTON HILLS, WAKE COUNTY
0P ~ I / 85 LF GUARDRAIL 0~
~ ~ ~ ~ OR 3 HIGH WALL ti - ~ ~ 26.00 ~ 4~, 8. ZONING: PROPOSED R-4 SINGLE FAMILY
~ I ^0~ J ~ ' 100 YR FLOOD STORAGE BNDY 9' INSIDE CITY LIMITS: PENDING ANNEXATION
f N M. KIM AND STEVEN L. R:CHAR ON V ~ ~ ~ ~ I /F DS G~ ~ DB 6625 PG 265 V ° i~ 10. INSIDE PRIMARY FIRE DISTRICT: NO INDEX
40.00 a , _ ~ e~ / W ~ 1,-, CE-1 SUBDIVISK)N PLAN
~ t 1 - I '•j / ~ I o 5 I _I 11. INSIDE FALLS, PERRY CREEK, OR SWIFT CREEK DRAINAGE AREA; NO CE-2 RINGLAND ROAD P&P
/ ~ o I 14 CE-3 EROSION CONTROL PLAN 12. INSIDE FLOOD HAZARD BOUNDARY: NO
~ ~ , ~ ~ ~ 30660 SF ~ rn o ~ • 1304 SF CE-4 OUTFACE A & B, STUB ROAD 13. FLOOR AREA RATIO: N/A X-1 CROSS SECTIONS 10+00-13+00
~ ~ BFE . \ o / i
~ ~ ~ I i z , / 14. OMIT X-2 CROSS SECTIONS 13+60-17+00 X-3 CROSS SECTIONS 17+50-19+50
i / ~ ~
/ / / ~ ~ / \ ~ / LOT LINE (TYP.) 15. DEDICATED GREENWAY: NONE DTL-1 STREET DETAILS DTL-2 UTILITY DETAILS
~ / / i / / i 16. DEVELOPER: STONEHAVEN LLC, 7200 STONEHENGE DR. #306, RALEIGH NC 27603, PH. 919-870-1262 DTL-3 EROSION CONTROL DETAILS
~ / ~ ~ i / i 17. DB 2877 PAGE Ofi24 .
~ 'i ~ ~ ~ ~
I S 81' 00 ~ \ I 5$ 6 Q ~ N/F KEVI G, PEREZ
E / DB 42 PG 107 Z NCDENR-DWQ REVISION
I a 6 8.03 0 , / ~ I } 0 - i 0 DELETE LOT #6 8/21/01
/ ! ti~ o ~ ~ ~ . 12 PUBLIC SS 0
_ NCDENR-DWQ REVISIONS 7/25/01
92.2 -J ~ v / ~ ~ R/W R/W ~ Q 1 COR COMMENTS s/e/o1
ep , i 10964 SF ~ \ \ ZONE 2 ~ c~ ~ m i / ~ ~ 8.. ~ ~2 ~ 9 / 45' WITH SIDEWALK 40' WITHOUT SIDEWALK Z
/ \ N/F GAIL EL SS SMp c ~ ~ r DB 7832 G B a ~ RIGHT OF WAY Z No. R Date C ewslon/Issue
1 j--_'-~ l ZONE 1 / G 0 1.D' 5.0 3.5 26.0 3.5
I i ~ ~ i / w / ~ / U RoaowaY J T .T r SIDEWALK UTILITY STRIP ~IIN.
\ \ TOP BANK / - / 1 Q / 2 5' ~ ~ W ~ TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERS AND SITE PLANNERS 10.5 1 D.5 2.5 ~ 16 Chancery Place, Durham NC 27707
/ _ N ~ ! 12 ~ ~ 2: ~ MAC. lL Phone or Fax [phone]
i / \ ~ ~ R35.00 ~ TOP BANK ~ 836 SF r/ / Email preecottddOmindepring.com
/ ~ , / N N 7 F Baum n~~~i 0 ~ GARO ,
i 1 n _ o, R ~ ^ ~ ~ / \ ZONE 1 ~S ~ PAVEMENT D SIGN ~ ~ Z ~
~ ~J / _ , , 19065 SF . • '00' - / I ~~i i o - ~ 45 40 RIGHT OF : o~..•';<ESS,p•.. WAY
~ ~ h N ONE 2 ~ o ~ ~ a ~ 6" A.B.C.--40' ROW SECTION I ~ 26 ROADWAY SECTI ~ ~ . ON SEAL
N 50 BUFFER T ' _ . • ' 37.50 ~ ' N/F WILLIAM C FRITTER 8 A.B.C.--45' ROW SECTION M 22508
~ ~ DB 3528 PG 50 NOTE: NORMAL CROWN OF 1 4" PER ~
N I \ 36_ co I ii '•FN E~•'• ~ ~ ,CINE,, ~ FOOT UNLESS OTHERWISE DIRECTED i~ ~ ~ FF~~~
2~ ~ ~ ~ \ ~ 3 11 \ / BY CITY ENGINEER. y~i~gN RJ~~
N F MICHAEL P. SAVILLE ~ \ / ~ ~ ~ anon
OB 7646 PG 381 / ~f ~ ~ X11077 SF a I \i - / Project Name and Address
~ ~ ~ ~ i
~ 5 ~ _ 65. 6 11178 SF I
_ 10 1 , ~ ~ ~ I 1
~ 9 _ -t ~ ~ I UTILITY INSTALLATIONS AND OTHER PUBLIC
i 11214 SF I 11426 SF / I „ FACILITIES, INCLUDING SIDEWALKS AND HANDICAP 8200 KNEBWORTH COURT
i - - 30 STD. CONC. C&G RAMPS ARE TO BE CONSTRUCTED ON ALL STREETS
N/F JAMES M, BRANNON ..~,,C~~,~' / ~ ~ ~ DB 4713 PG 867 - ~XJ ~ ~ i AS SPECIFIED BY CITY CODE, THESE FACILITIES CITY OF RALEIGH HAVE BEEN APPROVED BY THE CITY OF RALEIGH WAKE COUNTY
I ~ ~ ~ r 385.13 RIGHT-OF-WAY (TYP.) AND SHALL BE SO INSTALLED UNLESS A CHANG NORTH CAROLINA E
i \ ~ N/F EDWARQ'J. UNGEMACH N $ 1 03 5 \ , \ DB 7450 G 836 4 N/ IS AUTHORIZED BY WRITTEN APPROVAL. PUBLIC
SANITARY SEWER EASEMENTS ARE TO BE RECORDED
I / , N/F KENNETH B. LAWSON JR. ~ N CATHERINE M. KISER l PRIOR TO FINAL ACCEPTANCE. SIGNATURE; Dmwing sheet
I DB 7831 PG 190 ` DB 7623 PG 9485 N/F CHARLES E. BUCHANA
\ ( / DB 6352 PG 7D0 \ SUBDIVISION
\ \ I ~ / ~ \ I ~ \ , CHIEF ENGINEER Date PLAN
DIR. OF PUBLIC UTILITIES
rnnrnr r~ininirrn Scale _ ~ _
IRMrr V CwUmF-uz
CONSERVATION ENGINEER
0 50 100 150 200

EXISTING RINGLAND ROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY
SHOWN AS HATCHED AREA PER WAKE CO. MAP
KEYSTONE RETAINING WALL GENERAL NOTES 0
a p 1. BOUNDARY INFORMATION WAS TAKEN FROM A
m MAP PREPARED BY PEACOCK LAND SURVEYING,
o BENSON, NC, 27504, MAP N0. 99-0816-C, AND
KNEBWOR H o! REPRODUCED BY S.D. PUCKETT ASSOCIATES, ~ DURHAM NC, EXISTING IRON PINS WERE FIELD
O CHECKED AND SHALL BE PROPERLY INDICATED ON
Q ~ THE FINAL PLAT. -
p o 2. CITY OF RALEIGH SUBDIVISION #5 44-01 ~ w 3. STREET TOPOGRAPHY WAS OBTAINED BY AN
} ~ ACTUAL FIELD SURVEY BY S.D. PUCKETT Q p ASSOCIATES, DURHAM NC.
~ 4. DOWNSTREAM 5S MH EXISTING INFORMATION
HOWARD RD WAS APPROXIMATED; ACTUAL ELEVATION OF
ROAD CROSSING #1 EXISTING INVERT AND PIPE SIZE TO BE FIELD NEUSE RIVER RULE IMPACT,- MARY VERIFIED.
IMPACT LENGTH= X41 _LF ALONG CENTERLINE ~ z 5. ANY LAND SUBJECTED TO INCLREASED WATER STREAM ( ) p LEVELS SHALL BE DESIGNATED AS FLOOD
1 IMPACT AREA = 551 SF - ZONE U^ D J STDRAGE AREAS AND DELINEATED AND RECORDED
~ i I i \ ~ ~ , 2 IMPACT AREA = 4129 SF ` IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 10-3057 OF THE ZONE ~ Q
/ I I ~ , AS INCLUDE FILL SLOPES STONE ~ ~ CITY CODE. NOTE: ARE / ATE. p 6. LOT DIMENSIONS ARE APPROXIM
~ 11 \ ~ ;r ~ ~ I/ i ~ 7. A CONDITION OF APPROVAL OF THIS PLAN WILL
~ ~ ~ ~J 1 ~ r ' BE THAT THE OWNER SUBMIT A PETITION FOR
2 I l ~ J ~ ANNEXATION AFTER THE APPROVAL OF THE PRELIMINARY PLAN, AND RIOR TO RECORDING OF
~ ~ ~a ~ ~ Q a~ ~ I I ROAD CROSSING 2 LOT OR ISSUANCE OF ANY CONSTRUCTION PERMITS.
Z ~ N/F LOT 4, PHASE 3 , ~ I a PARKLYN WOODS S/D ~ ' CONTACT KAREN DUKE ®890 3656. NEUSE RIVER RULE IM ACT SUMMARY VICINITY MAP n.t.s. 8. NEUSE RIVER TRIBUTARIES EXIST ON THE
~ ~ I ~ ~ \m 1 , Q s zo I ~ STREAM IMPACT = '36 LF ALONG CENTERLINE ti PROPERTY. APPLICATION FOR PERMIT TO CROSS ( )
I3 4 I / 0 2 " i I ~ I TWO NRBR STREAMS (SECTION 401) IS MADE TO ZONE 1 IMPACT AREA'- 4062 SF 1 ` NCDENR-DWQ. PERMIT PENDING.
~ 4 F I ~ ~ ~ ZONE 2 IMPACT AREA = 2765 SF ~ Z R THE ~ ~ 9. THE SITE HAS BEEN INVESTIGATED FO
Ql ~ 58 38 8 ~ , I r _ I , s g¢ ~ NOTE: AREAS INCLUDE FILL SLOPES/STONE 1 PRESENCE OF WETLANDS BY COOPER
~ , Z~ / ENVIRONMENTAL, INC., 2300 SARDIS ROAD NORTH SUITE Q, CHARLOTTE NC 28227. PHONE
~ S~,• ~ , ~ I ~ ~ ~ N 4 ( 704.845.2000. NO SECTION 404 WETLANDS EXIST
~ 'o E ~ ~ 8~ _ • 68 ~ ~ BEYOND TOP OF BANK, AS INDICATED. 10. CURRENT PROPERTY OWNER: KARAM, MICHAEL
~ ~ ~ S 81 ' „ i N GERALD T. LUTZ gun Q. 8c MARY, 82
8 0 18 ~ ~ v ~ rn ~ O ~ E 431 8' ~ DB 4508 PG 484 a 11. THE BUILDING CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE TO VERIFY ALL BUILDING SETBACK
W O ti`O ~ ~ I ~ 1' F. Cv ~ ~ -0~!OE A N/F T.P. RINGLAN i REQUIREMENTS WITH THE INSPECTIONS DEPARTMENT.
I R 4 DB 6199 PG B - Z ~ ~ 12. COUNTOURS SOILS AND PLANIMETRICS SHOWN ! ' ARE FROM WAKE COUNTY MAPS AND ARE
a . , 1 ~ 4 - \ 19256 -SF APPROXIMATE.
~ e to ~ 2 Gg~ i ~ Q ~ SUMMARY 13. ALL LOTS TO BE RECORDED AT ONCE. NO PHASING IS PROPOSED.
c~ r r o~ 1~SF ~ ~r ~ , ~ / / 1. TOTAL AREA: 6.39 ACRES
~ ~ ~ ~ 11250 SF < Fs~ ~ /
r-- ~ ~ ~ co = - ~ 3 ~ • 2 , • ~ ~ 126$ SF rn ~ 2. TOTAL NUMBER OF LOTS: 15 EA
2 0 FT 16 r. , ~ B ~ h• -SID ~ • s0 , FE 36 r; ~ R a 0 B 9,5 ~ 3. WAKE COUNTY P.I.N.: 0797.05-19-0179
A M A RD p 13261 S o S ~ w T
L euc unL e o - / sMr , 4. DENSITY: 2.35 UNITS PER ACRE
11 ~ _ ~ o.oo ~ ~ i _ 5. STREET RIGHT-OF-WAY: 1.1 AC
x i
W 6. MINIMUM /AVERAGE LOT SIZE: 10890 5F / 15362 SF
~ 29 ' ~ ti 17432 SF 4.74 p ~ MINIMUM LOT WIDTH 65 FT
N • „ BFE 370.3 / 1~ 84 25 14 ~ ~ w s1.8s'.. ~ _ _ _ ~ p Q MINIMUM CORNER LOT WIDTH SO FT MINIMUM LOT DEPTH 100 F7
9.21 p~~ _ REQUIRED SETBACKS
/ f / ^ I ^ p 00 Q~ FRONT YARD 20 FT, REAR YARD 30 FT, AGGREGATE 40 Fi
~ / 00 ~ I 5 CONC. SW ~ ~Q ~ SIDE YARD 10 FT, CORNER SIDE YARD 20 FT, AGGREGATE 20 FT
I ~ ~ ~ ' - - r P~ ~ / I ~ 7. PART OF AN APPROVED SUBDIVISION: CLIFTON HILLS, WAKE COUNTY
~ ~ , ~ R I 0~ 85 LF GUARD A L ~Q
, i~ ~ W OR 3 HIGH WALL ti ~ 26 ~ - 8. ZONING: PROPOSED R-4 SINGLE FAMILY
100 YR FLOOD 9. INSIDE CITY LIMITS: PENDING ANNEXATION STORAGE BNDY
1 ti ~ ~ ~ ( N/F Y. KIM AND STEVEN L. r~.AARDSON a I ~ , ~ DB 6625 PG 265 ~ ~ m i 10. INSIDE PRIMARY FIRE DISTRICT: NU INDEX
I 40.00 ~a I CE-1 SUBDNISION PLAN
1 I I I 11. INSIDE FALLS, PERRY CREEK, OR SWIFT CREEK DRAINAGE AREA: NO CE-2 RINGLAND ROAD P&P
~ ~ I o 5 I / ~ 0 14 , _.--4 12. INSIDE FLOOD HAZARD BOUNDARY: NO CE-3 EROSION CONTROL PLAN
i ' ~ ~ ~ / ~ / ~ ~ 30660 SF rn o / • 21304 SF CE-4 OUTFACE A & B, STUB ROAD 13. FLOOR AREA RATIO; N/A X-1 CROSS SECTIONS 10+00-13+00
/ ~ , ~ o f BFE 3
~ ~ / / ~ ~ ~ I 14. OMIT X-2 CROSS SECTIONS 13+60-17+00 x-3 CROSS sECTIONS 17+50-t9+50
i ~ Z i ~ i / ~ /
,i / LOT LINE (TYP.) 15. DEDICATED GREENWAY: NONE DTL-1 STREET DETAILS DTL-2 UTILITY DETAILS
I \ / ~ 16. DEVELOPER: STONEHAVEN LLC, 7200 STONEHENGE DR. #3D6, RALEIGH NC 27603, PH. 919-870-1262 DTL-3 EROSION CONTROL DETAILS M<
/ ~ , ~ / , . • 17. DB 2877 PAGE 0624
L ~ / \
~
\ ~ S 81'58' „ 0 - ~ N/F KEV G, PEREZ 6 E ~ / DB 42 PG 107 Z NCDENR-DWQ REVISION
, 6 88.p 0 ~ / 3 ~ 3 0 - - i ' 0 DELETE LOT ~6 8/21/01
• 0 y ~ EX. 12 PUBLIC SS 0 ` ~ ~ ~ ~r i NCDENR-DWQ REVISIONS 7/z5/o1
/ - 13 _ ~ D
/ 50 UFFER ~ r ~ ~ ~ ~ R/W R/W ~ Q 1 COR COMMENTS s/B/D1
\ 2~Z J 4 ~ / If) ~ g e~, ~ ~ i 10964 SF ~ ~ \ ZONE 2 ~ m ~ 45' WITH SIDEWALK 40' WITHOUT SIDEWALK Z
~ ~ / q ~ \ N/F GAIL EL B° 5S SMp ~ 2 ~ ~ ~ / ~ ~ / RIGHT OF WAY ~ Z No. Revision Issue Date
~ DB 7832 G B / - ~ ZONE 1 ~ T / , , , f. 0 1.D' 5.0 3.5 26.0 3.5 - ~
ROADWAY ~ ~ T •T L'!
~ \ TOP BANK ~ - - SIDEWALK UTILITY STRIP MIN, W ~ TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERS AND SITE PLANNERS 2.5' 10.5 10.5 2.5 0 16 Chancery Ploce, Durham NC 27707
/ l o / ~ / 2. MAX, Phone or Fax [phone] . , ~ Email proacottddOmindapring.com
~ _ R35.00 ^ I / ~ 1~_, TOP BANK ~ ~ ~ \
~ / ti / N ~ 836 SF / I- ~nnnn
/ I r ~ \ ZONE 1 ~s I PAVEMENT DESIGN 0~.•''EESS~O''•. 'L ~~i
~J / _ 19065 S~ . - i ~ o - I 45 40 RIGHT OF WAY . o 2" I-2 r ~ ~ e~ N9~'• v
ONE 2 ~ o 6'~ A.B.C.--40' ROW SECTION ~ ~ S 26 ROADWAY SECTION - SEAL -
~ ~ N I 50 BUFFER T • • 37.50 ~ J - N/F WILLIAM C FRITTER 8 A.B,C,--45' ROW SECTION "s 22508 s
~ ~ DB 3528 PG 50 F 1 NOTE; NORMAL CROWN 0 /4 PER ~'FNGINEE~'~
~ N 36 ~ I \ 21 ' ~ I FOOT UNLESS OTHERWISE DIRECTED FF~~~
3 11 \ \ / IN ER. i~~~ lqN R~ BY CITY ENG E P . H~~a
_ ~ I ~ N/F MICHAEL P. SAVILLE / \ I iuuw
/ DB 7646 PG 381 ~ S r ~ \11077 SF ~a I ~i - ~ Project Name and Address
8 0 ~ ~
_ 65'1 6~ ' 11178 SF \ I i I
I _ ~ 10 ; 1 ~ I
~ 9 l UTILITY INSTALLATIONS AND OTHER PUBLIC
- i 11214 SF I 11426 SF / ~ ~ „ FACILITIES, INCLUDING SIDEWALKS AND HANDICAP 8200 KNEBWORTH COURT
i - - ~ 30 STD, CONC. C&G RAMPS ARE TO BE CONSTRUCTED ON ALL STREETS
/ N/F JAMES M. BRANNON Y-' / ~ ~ DB 4713 PG 867 .1 ~J ~ i AS SPECIFIED BY CITY CODE. THESE FACILITIES CITY OF RALEIGH HAVE BEEN APPROVED BY THE CITY OF RALEIGH WAKE COUNTY
I 3 \ / r _85.13 RIGHT-OF-WAY (TYP.) AND SHALL BE SO INSTALLED UNLESS A CHANGE NORTH CAROLINA
I \ ~ N/F EDWARjYJ. UNGEMACH N $ ~ 03 ~ I DB 7450 G 838 54 w IS AUTHORIZED BY WRITTEN APPROVAL. PUBLIC
I SANITARY SEWER EASEMENTS ARE TO BE RECORDED
~ 1 N F KENNETH B. LAWSON JR. C PRIOR TO FINAL ACCEPTANCE. SIGNATURE: Drowfng sheet
DB 7831 PG 190 N/F CATHERINE M. KISER 1 DB 7623 PG 9485
N/F CHARLES E. BUCHANA ~ ( / DB 6352 PG 700 SUBDIVISION
\ v I ~ l ~ CHIEF ENGINEER Date PLAN
\ I 1 \ , 5.1 1 DIR. OF PUBLIC UTILITIFR
Tonrrir r~i~inirro Sccle
IfSt'\FFI i CIVVIIVCC~
CONSERVATION ENGINEER
0 50 100 150 200

EXISTING RINGLAND ROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY
SHOWN AS HATCHED AREA PER WAKE CO. MAP
KEYSTONE RETAINING WALL o GENERAL NOTES
Q p 1. BOUNDARY INFORMATION WAS TAKEN FROM A
m MAP PREPARED BY PEACOCK LAND SURVEYING,
o BENSON, NC, 27504, MAP N0. 99-0816-C, AND
KNEBWOR H ~ REPRODUCED BY S.D. PUCKETT ASSOCIATES, ~ DURHAM NC. EXISTING IRON PINS WERE FIELD
o CHECKED AND SHALL BE PROPERLY INDICATED ON
Q ~ THE FINAL PLAT. p o 2. CITY OF RALEIGH SUBDIVISION ~S-44-01
~ w 3. STREET TOPOGRAPHY WAS OBTAINED BY AN
} ~ ACTUAL FIELD SURVEY BY S.D. PUCKETT
~ ASSOCIATES, DURHAM NC. 4. DOWNSTREAM SS MH EXISTING INFORMATION
ROAD CROSSING 1 HOWARD RD WAS APPROXIMATED; ACTUAL ELEVATION OF
EXISTING INVERT AND PIPE SIZE TO BE FIELD NEUSE RIVER RULE IMPACT SUMMARY VERIFIED.
STREAM IMPACT LENGTH= 141 LF (ALONG CENTERLINE) z 5. ANY LAND SUBJECTED TO INCLREASED WATER
\ ~ ZONE 1 IMPACT AREA - 5851 SF p LEVELS SHALL BE DESIGNATED A5 °FLOOD w STORAGE AREAS AND DELINEATED AND RECORDED
~ • ZONE 2 IMPACT AREA = 4129 SF Q IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 10-3057 OF THE
/ ~ ~ NOTE: AREAS INCLUDE FILL SLOPES/STONE ~ CITY CODE.
~ I I/ ~ ~ - I i/ O 6. LOT DIMENSIONS ARE APPROXIMATE. 7• A CONDITION OF APPROVAL OF THIS PLAN WILL
~ ~ ~ I i ~ ~ a \ ~ , BE THAT THE OWNER SUBMIT A PETITION FOR
/ Q ~a ~ ANNEXATION AFTER THE APPROVAL OF THE PRELIMINARY PLAN, AND RIOR TO RECORDING OF
2 ~ ~ / N F LOT 4 PHASE 3 a s ~ I ~a ~ / ~ ~ ~ PARKLYN WOODS S/D m ~ ~ ~ ROAD CROSSING #2 LOT OR ISSUANCE OF ANY CONSTRUCTION PERMITS.
~ ~m ~ ~Q S~, zo / / NEUSE RIVER RULE IMPACT SUMMARY CONTACT KAREN DUKE ®890-3656. VICINITY MAP n.t.s. 8. NEUSE RIVER TRIBUTARIES EXIST ON THE
3 / / 40 ~ STREAM IMPACT = 136 LF (ALONG CENTERLINE) PROPERTY. APPLICATION FOR PERMIT TO CROSS
m /T ?4 I i ~ I ~ ZONE 1 IMPACT AREA = 4062 SF TWO NRBR STREAMS (SECTION 401) IS MADE TO
S1. ~ \ ~ ~ ( m / S8 338 , ~ ~ ~ \ 86 44•,1 r I ZONE 2 IMPACT AREA = 2765 SF NCDENR-DWQ. PERMIT PENDING.
1 / ~ NOTE: AREAS INCLUDE FILL SLOPES STONE 9. THE SITE HAS BEEN INVESTIGATED FOR THE / PRESENCE OF WETLANDS BY COOPER
N S24'4 ' ~ / ,v~ \ ~ ~ ~ ~ I .o _ , 3 ,8 1 ~ , ENVIRONMENTAL, INC., 2300 SARDIS ROAD NORTH SUITE Q, CHARLOTTE NC 28227. PHONE
ti 8~ ,g E __6 8 ~ ~ l 704.845.2000. NO SECTION 404 WETLANDS EXIST
~ ~ ~ g ~ ~ 81' " ~ ~v BEYOND TOP OF BANK, AS INDICATED. 10. CURRENT PROPERTY OWNER: KARAM, MICHAEL
81, ~ 1$ E 4 !I ~ _ , ~ I N/F GERALD L LUTZ m ~ rp' _ ~ ,,i 31.8 ~ y DB 4506 PG 484 T. LUTZ Q. 8t MARY, 82 ~4 11. THE BUILDING CONTRACTOR SHALL BE
W~ ~ ~0 SIpE I RESPONSIBLE TO VERIFY ALL BUILDING SETBACK
BAR N/F T.P. RINGLAN ( ` I DB 6199 PG 8 l , REQUIREMENTS WITH THE INSPECTIONS DEPARTMENT.
cu 12 4 1 44, \ ,1 ' 1 / ~ , 12. COUNTOURS, SOILS AND PLANIMETRICS SHOWN ARE FROM WAKE COUNTY MAPS AND ARE
~ ~ A 19256 SF ~ \ \ ~ ~ 1
• ~ 1 SF ~ ~ Q / a ~4 ~ ~ r ~ SUMMARY APPROXIMATE. 13. ALL LOTS TO BE RECORDED AT ONCE. NO / PHASING 15 PROPOSED.
~n ~ ~ 11250 SF _ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ FS\ ` h 3 ~ 1. TOTAL AREA: 6.39 ACRES
2 \ 20 F ~ ~ ~ 12 rn u~ B T & 6~ SF 16 r\ - Q - S o ~ 2. TOTAL NUMBER OF LOTS: 15 EA
A - a ip D - ~o , S 13261 S AR M 0 BFE 369.5 ~ ~ T - p ~w ~o 3. WAKE COUNTY P.I.N.: 0797.05-19-0179
~ _ ~ ~ ~ L (P 20' p ~ - / UBL~C UTII E O 4. DENSITY: 2.35 UNITS PER ACRE
SMT / - ~
/ ~ - X ~ 0,00 w ~ 5. STREET RIGHT-OF-WAY: 1.1 AC
~ ~ ~ Q~ 6. MINIMUM /AVERAGE LOT SIZE: 10890 SF / 15362 SF
~ I 294, ~ 15 ,~~j ~ 1 17432 SF MINIMUM LOT WIDTH 65 FT
N 84'25' " ~ BF 14 W 91 O E 370.3 / MINIMUM CORNER LOT WIDTH 80 FT
9, ~ oo . . p 9 ° o MINIMUM LOT DEPTH 100 FT
~ o>> _ , REQUIRED SETBACKS
I ~ STORMWATER OUTFACE ~ ti' 5 CO SW / ~ SHALL BE OUTSIDE OF / ~ FRONT YARD 20 Ff, REAR YARD 30 FT, AGGREGATE 40 FT SIDE YARD 10 FT, CORNER SIDE YARD 20 FT, AGGREGATE 20 FT
_ I I I - ~ RIPARIAN BUFFER
/ 0P ~ / I ~ 7. PART OF AN APPROVED SUBDIVISION: CLIFTON HILLS, WAKE COUNTY
85 LF GUARDRAIL w • ' ~ B. ZONING; PROPOSED R-4 SINGLE FAMILY
1 OR 3 HIGH WALL ~ ~ 26.00' J - ' ~ 100 YR FLOOD
I v / U • I 60 LF RET WALL ~ m ~ • _ ~ ~ , STORAGE BNDY 9' INSIDE CITY LIMITS: PENDING ANNEXATION
HEIGHT VARIES v w 40.00' a / - . , 10, INSIDE PRIMARY FIRE DISTRICT: NO INDEX
f= ~ ~ 11. INSIDE FALLS PERRY CE-1 SUBDIVISION PLAN CREEK, OR SWIFT CREEK DRAINAGE AREA: NO CE-2 RIN
/ 24 TH, CL. 1 RIPRAP APRON I o ~ 5 GLAND ROAD P&P
~ , o I 14 % CL. 1 RIPRAP CHNNL ~ ~ 30660 SF ~ / , 12. INSIDE FLOOD HAZARD BOUNDARY: NO CE-3 EROSKNd CONTROL PLAN
~rn ~ ~ ~ LINING TO EL 368.60 0 / 29304 SF CE-4 OUTFACE A & B, STUB ROAD 13. FLOOR AREA RATIO: N/A X-1 CROSS SECTIONS 10+00-13+00
~ Qj o ~ ~ BFE 3 , ? ~ ~ (TO TOP OF BANK) ~ ~
i ~ ~z ; 14. OMIT X-2 CROSS SECTIONS 13+60-17+00 , X-3 CROSS SECTIONS 17+50-19+50 ~ -
N F M. KIM ' ~ i 3 ~ / AND STEVEN L. RICFIARDSON / ~ ~ DB 6625 PG 265 ~ ~ d. / IN 15. DEDICATED GREENWAY: NONE DTL-1 STREET D T LOT L E (TYP.) E AILS ~
~ ~ n O _ DTL-2 UTILITY DETAILS 16. DEVELOPER: STONEHAVEN LLC, 7200 STONEHENGE DR. #306, RALEIGH NC 27603, PH. 919-870-1262
/ ; ~ DTL-3 EROSION CONTROL DETAILS
~,i i ~ 17. DB 2871 PAGE 0624
NCDENR-pWQ R~VIgION uf? _ 4 Relocate Storm Dischar e 8 31 01
1 58 6" 0 ~ ~ N/F KEVI G. PEREZ E ~ ~ I 8 ~ DB 42 PG 7D7 g . / / u? Revise Channel Lining Detail
8. a3 0 ~ Z NCDENR-DWQ REVISION
EX. 12 PUBLIC SS ~ ~ / . ~ ~i Q 3 s/21/o1 Delete Lot ~6
I ~ ~ i / ~ _ / / f Z ~ r~ NCDENR-DWQ REVISION 7/25/01 _
5O UFFER ~LJ •J \ ,~2 ~ J ~ r` ~ / i'^ M ~ Revise Roadway Alignment Li„
g2 ~ e ~ • \ ZONE 2 ~~c. i 10964 SF ~ ~ R/W R ~ ~W Q 1 COR COMMENTS s/6/o1
~ N/F GAIL 6^ 55 SNr ~ I / j ~ 45' WITH SIDEWALK 40' WITHOUT SIDEWALK Z
/ DB 7632 8 , / I ZONE 1 • ' / - ___I , / RIGHT Of WAY CC O No• Revision/Issue Date
~ / ~ ~ / w ~ ~ , G 1.a' 5.0' 3.5' 26.0 3.5' U
~ I ~ \ ~ ~ TOP BANK o / - - - 24" TH. C J 'I~ 24 TH. CL. 1 RIPRAP APRON SIDEWALK UTILITY STRIP ROADWAY r+~
/ N ~ / / MIN. W ~ TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERS AND SRE PLANNERS 2.5' 10.5' 10.5' 2.5' O 16 Chancery Place, Durhom NC 27707
~ I ~ 12 ~ / , TOP BANK ~ ~ • ~
' ~ ~ ~ N N ~ 836 SF ~ 2:1 MAX. ~ Phone or Fax [phone]- Email cottddOminde n .com P~ P~ 9
\ ~ , r , ~ ZONE 1 0o R~ ~ ( z + s 1 F- <<~nmmp~ O CAR ~~i
/ ~ ~ i , . N oa, - / > > 0~ fir, PAVEMENT DESIGN Z / ~i
~ ~ ONE 2 ~ N 45 40 •0 .•oFESS~oN•. ti 4 RIG HT OF WA Y
o ~ Q~ / N I / 5O BUFFERS'" ' • ~ • • 37.50 N/F WILLIAM C FRITTER CL. 1 RIPRAP CHNNL 6" A.B.C.--40' ROW SECTION ~ ~ „ 26 R - sEa~ OAD W .
N/F MICHAEL P. SAVILLE ~ ~ DB 3528 PG 5D AY S . I ECTI L NING TO EL 369.70 _ ON 8 A.B.C.- 45 ROW SECTION 22508
DB 7646 PG 381 \ 3 N I 7 6~, f ~ (TO TOP OF BANK) TYPICAL BOTH SIDES NOTE: NORMAL CROWN OF 1 4" PER ~i •'•.F
~2• I (0 t \ \ ~ 11 •.NGINEE•• FOOT UNLESS OTHERWISE DIRECTED ~i~~ F~
\ 19065 SF ~ ~ BY 'wi ~qN . R~ ~`a CITY ENGINEER. y~~~ P ~~~~a llllllll
S ~ ~ \11077 SF
STORMWATER OUTFACE _ ~o- I ~I SHALL BE OUTSIDE OF ~ 8 ' 0 Project Name and Address
_ ~ _ 1 5 RIPARIAN BUFFER 65. 6 i
11178 SF _ _ ~ ~ / ~ ~ / I
10 ti .
- - ~ 11426 SF ~ ~ ~I 11214 SF I / 1 i UTILITY INSTALLATIONS AND OTHER PUBLIC
/ ~ ~ / - ~ ~ FACILITIES, INCLUDING SIDEWALKS AND HANDICAP 8200 KNEBW 30 STD. CONC. C&G RAMPS ARE TO BE CONSTRUCTED ON ALL STREETS ORTH COURT
~ N/F JAMES M. BRANNON ~ DB 4713 PG 867 / ~ AS SPECIFIED BY CITY CODE. THESE FACILITIES CITY OF RALEIGH
~ I I ~ ~ 385.1 ' ~ / I\ I ~ ~ 3 HAVE BEEN APPROVED BY THE CITY OF RALEIGH WAKE COUNTY RIGHT-OF-WAY (TYP.) NORTH CAR
I N/F EDWAR?'J. UNCEMACH N 83'03' ~ , AND SHALL BE SO INSTALLED UNLESS A CHANGE OLINA
74 54 \ DB 50 G 836 W l IS AUTHORIZED BY WRITTEN APPROVAL. PUBLIC SANITARY SEWER EASEMENTS ARE TO BE RECORDED
I PRIOR TO FINAL ACCEPTANCE.
N/F KENNETH B. LAW50N JR. 1 1 DB 7831 PG 190 , N/F CATHERINE M. KISER t SIGNATURE: omwing sheet
/ ~ N F CHARLES E. BUCHANA DB 7623 PG 9485 \ DB 6352 PG 700
\ ~ ~ / ~ SUBDIVISION CHIEF ENGINEER
°ate PLAN
5.~ I DIR. OF PLBLIC UTILITIES
TRAFFIC ENGINEER sCOle an
CONSERVATION ENGINEER
0 50 100 150 200

EXISTING RINGLAND ROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY
SHOWN AS HATCHED AREA PER WAKE CO. MAP
GENERAL NOTES p
KEYSTONE RETAINING WALL a
~ 1. BOUNDARY INFORMATION WAS TAKEN FROM A m MAP PREPARED 8Y PEACOCK LAND SURVEYING,
p BENSON, NC, 27504, MAP N0. 99-0816-C, AND
KNEBWOR H tr REPRODUCED BY S.D. PUCKETT ASSOCIATES, ~ DURHAM NC. EXISTING IRON PINS WERE FIELD
o CHECKED AND SHALL BE PROPERLY INDICATED ON
p ~ THE FINAL PLAT. Q p 2. CITY OF RALEIGH SUBDIVISION #5-44-01
~ w 3. STREET TOPOGRAPHY WAS OBTAINED BY AN ~ w
r ~ ACTUAL FIELD SURVEY BY S.D. PUCKETT
Q v ASSOCIATES, DURHAM NC. ~ 4. DOWNSTREAM SS MH EXISTING INFORMATION
HOWARD RD WAS APPROXIMATED; ACTUAL ELEVATION OF
ROAD CROSSING #1 EXISTING INVERT AND PIPE SIZE TO BE FIELD
NEUSE RIVER RULE IMPACT SUMMARY VERIFIED. 5. ANY LAND SUBJECTED TO INCLREASED WATER
STREAM IMPACT LENGTH= 141 LF (ALONG CENTERLINE) ~ LEVELS SHALL BE DESIGNATED AS °FLOOD ZONE 1 IMPACT AREA = 5851 SF w STORAGE AREAS° AND DELINEATED AND RECORDED
\ , ~ _ ZONE 2 IMPACT AREA = 4129 SF Q IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 10-3057 OF THE
NOTE: AREAS INCLUDE FILL SLOPES/STONE ~ CITY CODE. p 6. LOT DIMENSIONS ARE APPROXIMATE.
~ i ; ~ ~ 7. A CONDITION OF APPROVAL OF THIS PLAN WILL
~ I I/ i \ ~ - I i l BE THAT THE OWNER SUBMIT A PETITION FOR
~ ~ I 2 ? l ~ ANNEXATION AFTER THE APPROVAL OF THE 1 PRELIMINARY PLAN, AND RIOR TO RECORDING OF
~ ~ \ LOT OR ISSUANCE OF ANY CONSTRUCTION PERMITS. ROAD CROSSING #2 CONTACT KAREN DUKE ®890-3656.
Z N/F LOT 4, PHASE 3 4 ~ ~ 1 ~.l a ~ ~ ~ I ~ ~ PARKLYN WOODS S/D ~ ~ ~ / NEUSE RIVER RULE IMPACT SUMMARY VICINITY f~AP n.t.s. 8. NEUSE RIVER TRIBUTARIES EXIST ON THE
~ ~ \m / Q $ Z a ~ I STREAM IMPACT - 136 LF (ALONG CENTERLINE) PROPERTY. APPLICATION FOR PERMIT TO CROSS
13 4 , I / ZONE 1 IMPACT AREA - 4062 SF TWO NRBR STREAMS (SECTION 401) IS MADE TO
m 4 F I ~ 1S 67 • s ~ = 765 SF NCDENR-DWQ. PERMIT PENDING. ZONE 2 IMPACT AREA 2 9. THE SITE HAS BEEN INVESTIGATED FOR THE
1.g ~ 3 - ~ , ~ I Q~ / 8 ~8 84 yl i J 1 ! 1 .6~,4 ~ NOTE; AREAS INCLUDE FILL SLOPES/STONE PRESENCE OF WETLANDS BY COOPER
~ ENVIRONMENTAL, INC., 2300 SARDIS ROAD NORTH SUITE Q, CHARLOTTE NC 28227. PHONE
N wcr 4 4 ~ ~ ~ 704.845.2000. NO SECTION 404 WETLANDS EXIST
I 68 ~ ~ , BEYOND TOP OF BANK, AS INDICATED. 10. CURRENT PROPERTY OWNER: KARAM, MICHAEL
O ~ ~ l .~,J ~ J 5' 8 n ~ ~ V N/F GERALD L LUTZ GERALD L LUTZ Q. 8t MARY, 82
8 18 ~ _ 1.7 0° E 431, ' ~ ~ DB 45D8 PG 484 • { 8 DDB PG 484 11. THE BUILDING CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE TO VERIFY ALL BUILDING SETBACK
mo ~ I ~ 1' ~ ~O~DE A N/F T.P. RINGLAN REQUIREMENTS WITH THE INSPECTIONS DEPARTMENT.
: 11 R I >'V, DB 6199 PG 8 _ - G~ ~ 4 ~ - 12. COUNTOURS, SOILS AND PLANIMETRICS SHOWN ARE FROM WAKE COUNTY MAPS AND ARE
APPROXIMATE.
" 9 SF ~ \ p ~ ~ SUMMARY 13. ALL LOTS TO BE RECORDED AT ONCE. NO ~ PHASING IS PROPOSED.
c\ r i 1 1. TOTAL AREA: 6.39 ACRES
~ co ~ 11250 SF <FS\ /
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ti co ~ = ~ ~ 3 ~ ' ~ ~ ~ ~ 126 SF rn ~ ` 2. TOTAL NUMBER OF LOTS: 15 EA
2 ~ 20 FT B 16 r\ ~ B h• -SID ~ 'o . BFE 369. r; n R a o 5 3. WAKE COUNTY P.I.N.: 0797.05-19-0179
0 A A RD 13261 S o S ~ N. T w
~ euc unL o - / ESM T 4. DENSITY: 2.35 UNITS PER ACRE
~ - - _ ~ 0.00 5. STREET RIGHT-OF-WAY: 1.1 AC
~ / - X ~ ~
w ~ 6. MINIMUM /AVERAGE LOT SIZE: 10890 SF / 15362 SF
~ 294 ' ~ ti 17432 SF ~ .74 MINIMUM LOT WIDTH 65 F1' MINIMUM CORNER LOT WIDTH 80 FT
N 84'25 14" ~1~ BFE 370.3 ~ W 91. g' 0 0 . . MINIMUM LOT DEPTH 100 FT
p o 0 9'1 0 REQUIRED SETBACKS
7 , STORMWATER OUTFACE ~~ti • / FRONT YARD 20 FT, REAR YARD 30 FT, AGGREGATE 40 Fl~
5 CON SW / / , , , I I SHALL BE OUTSIDE OF I SIDE YARD 10 FT, CORNER SIDE YARD 20 FT, AGGREGATE 20 FT
~ ~ - _ r RIPARIAN BUFFER ~ / ~ ~ 7, PART OF AN APPROVED SUBDIVISION: CLIFTON HILLS, WAKE COUNTY
0P ~ ~ ~ . 8, ZONING; PROPOSED R-4 SINGLE FAMILY
w 85 LF GUARDRAIL ~ Q 100 YR FLOOD 9, INSIDE CITY LIMITS: PENDING ANNEXATION
OR 3 HIGH WALL / 00 F ~ ~ ~ • ~i STORAGE BNDY
I \ i/ ~ ~ m 60 LF RET WALL / ~ ' 10. INSIDE PRIMARY FIRE DISTRICT: NO INDEX
HEIGHT VARIES J W 40.00 a ~ - , . ,y^_- ,0 / - I CE-1 SUBDIVISK)N PLAN
i + I I 11. INSIDE FALLS, PERRY CREEK, OR SWIFT CREEK DRAINAGE AREA: NO CE-2 RINGLAND ROAD P&P
/ ~ 24" TH. CL. 1 RIPRAP APRON ~ o ~ 5 I / ~ o ~ 14 , ~ 12. INSIDE FLOOD HAZARD BOUNDARY; NO CE-3 EROSK}N CONTROL PLAN
~ ~ ~ I • i'~ ~ i i CL. 1 RIPRAP CHNNL ~ 30660 SF ~ CE-4 OUTFACE A & B, STUB ROAD 13. FLOOR AREA RATIO: N/A X-1 CROSS SECTIONS 10+00-13+00
~ ~ LINING TO EL 368.60 ~ ~ ~ BFE 3 / ~ o i ~ ~ /
~ (TO TOP OF BANK) ~ , ~ i z , / 14. OMIT X-2 CROSS SECTIONS 13+fi0-17+00 x-3 CROSS sECTIONS 17+50-19+50
n 3 i / ~ w ~ / 15. DEDICATED GREENWAY: NONE DTL-1 STREET DETAILS
N F M. KIM AND STEVEN L. RICHARDSON • / i ~ I / / / ~ d' ~ DB 6625 PG 265 ~ n O LOT LINE (TYP.) DTL-2 UTILITY DETAILS 1
/ % r^ ~ O % 16. DEVELOPER: STONEHAVEN LLC, 7200 STONEHENGE DR. #306, RALEIGH NC 27603, PH. 919-870-1262 DTL-3 EROSION CONTROL DETAILS ;
~ 17. DB 2877 PAGE 0624
~ ~ ~ ~ / ~ / ~ n i~ / ~ NCDENR-pWQ R SION Relocate Sform Discharge 8/31/01 , ;
/ ~ _ L / / \ ~ S 81'5 „ O ~ N/F KEV G. PEREZ 4 Revise Channel Lining Detail ) EREZ
\ I 8 6 E ~ / DB 42 PG 707 ~ Z NCDENR-DWQ REVISION
I k .3 0 - ~ 0 3 6 B/z1/o1 Delete Lot ~
/ I 1, ti~ 0 / / y ~ EX. 12 PUBLIC SS ` ~ ~ i NCDENR-DWQ REVISION 7 25 01 ' ~ Revise Roadwc Ali nment / /
/ \ ~ ~ / _ ~ 3 ' Y 9 LL
/ 50 UFFER . ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~2 J . • ~ / ~ R W R W ~ 6 8 01 Q 1 COR COMMENTS / /
g2 ~ 10964 SF eh . ~ ~ i \ ZONE 2 c ~ ~ ' 45' WITH SIDEWALK 40' WITHOUT 51JEWALK Z
/ \ / N/F GAIL EL SS MT RIGHT OF WAY ~ Z No, Revision Issue Date /
~ DB 7832 G 8 ~ / ` ~ ZONE 1 ~ ~ ~ 0
~ w ~ ~ - - 1.0' S.0' 3.5' 26.0' 3.5' - ~ J ~ ~S,C
i,- / \ ~ 241, ~ \ TOP BANK o - 1 l i / 24" TH. CL. 1 RIPRAP APRON SIDEWALK UTILITY STRIP ROADWAY MIN. W ~ TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERS AND SITE PLANNERS 2.5' 10.5' 10.5' 2.5' ~ O 16 Chancery Place, Durham NC 27707
N ~ ~ , IL Phone or Fax [phone]:1 MAX, ~ Email prescottddOmindspring.com
/ \ ~ ~ R35.00 ~ ~ TOP BANK ~ ~ • • 836 SF / ~ ; I- ~anin
~ ~ I ~ N N / ~ n~a~i O ~ CARD i~
~ ,y ~ " ` ZONE 1 ~ PAVEMENT DESIGN 0 .•oFLSS~oN•.•2
/ I, ~ ~ _ / ~~i ~ o „ 45 40 RIGHT OF WAY ~ 9•.9s 2 I-2 .a
CL. 1 RIPRAP CHNNL 6" A.B.C.--40' ROW SECTION ' SEAL
N 50 BUFFER ~ ' • • 37.50 ~ N/F WILLIAM C FRITTER / ~ DB 3528 PG 50 » 26 ROADWAY SECTION RirrER LINING TO EL 369.70 g A.B.C.--45 ROW SECTION 22508
N/F MICHAEL P. SAVILLE ~ (TO TOP OF BANK) „
DB 7646 PG 381 N I 7 36, co TYPICAL BOTH SIDES NOTE: NORMAL CROWN OF 1/4 PER B'•FNGINEE~`'•~ FOOT UNLESS OTHERWISE DIRECTED ~4~'~/ ~F
2~ ~ ~ / 3 11 ~ ~ / i ~igNP.Ra~ BY CITY ENGINEER. ~ggp~pp~~
- ~ 1 sF / ~ ' 1 ~ / S I ~ \11077 SF
STORMWATER OUTFACE _ a I / i Project Name and Address
8 0 ~ SHALL BE OUTSIDE OF ~ /g. 1
RIPARIAN BUFFER 65. 6 11178 SF r I
_ ~ ~ _ ~ 10 ~ _ ~ I 1
g ~1 _ - ~ SF ~ I } UTILITY INSTALLATIONS AND OTHER PUBLIC
~ 11 1 I 11426 / ~ _ 2 4 S F ~ ~ I FACILITIES, INCLUDING SIDEWALKS AND HANDICAP 8200 KNEBWORTH COURT 30 STD. CONC. C&G RAMPS ARE. TO BE CONSTRUCTED ON ALL STREETS
- - ~ AS SPECIFIED BY CITY CODE. THESE FACILITIES CITY OF RALEIGH
/ N/F JAMES M. BRANNON / ~ J DB 4713 PG 867 ''v ~ ~ ~ ~ WAKE COUNTY HAVE BEEN APPROVED BY THE CITY OF RALEIGH
~ 5.13 RIGHT-OF-WAY (TYP.) AND SHALL BE SO INSTALLED UNLESS A CHANGE NORTH CAROLINA
N/F EDWARJYJ. UNGEMACH N 83'03' ~ , DB 7450 G 838 54 W ~ IS AUTHORIZED BY WRITTEN APPROVAL. PUBLIC ~ SANITARY SEWER EASEMENTS ARE TO BE RECORDED
PRIOR TO FINAL ACCEPTANCE.
I ~ 1 NNETH B. LAWSON JR. N/F KE N/F CATHERINE M. KISER t SIGNATURE: Drawing sheet
I DB 7831 PG 190 1 DB 7623 PG 9485 N/F CHARLES E. BUCHANA
~ ~ DB 6352 PG 700 ~ SUBDIVISION ~ CHIEF ENGINEER
~ ~ \ ~ ~ ~ ~ l Date PLAN
5.1 1 DIR. OF PUBLIC UTILITIFs
TRAFFIC ENGINEER $00~e ~In_cr1~
1 =~?V
CONSERVATION ENGINEER
0 50 100 150 200

_
EXISTING RINGLAND ROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY
SHOWN AS HATCHED AREA PER WAKE CO. MAP
KE:YSTONE RETAINING WALL o GENERAL NOTES
a p i. BOUNDARY INFORMATION WAS TAKEN FROM A
m MAP PREPARED BY PEACOCK LAND SURVEYING,
o BENSON, NC, 27504, MAP N0. 99-0816-C, AND KNEBWOR H ~ REPRODUCED BY S.D. PUCKETT ASSOCIATES,
~ DURHAM NC. EXISTING IRON PINS WERE FIELD
o CHECKED AND SHALL BE PROPERLY INDICATED ON THE FINAL PLAT.
p p 2. CITY OF RALEIGH SUBDIVISION #5-44-01
rY w 3. STREET TOPOGRAPHY WAS OBTAINED BY AN
} U ACTUAL FIELD SURVEY BY S.D. PUCKETT ~ ASSOCIATES, DURHAM NC.
4. DOWNSTREAM SS MH EXISTING INFORMATION
ROAD CROSSING 1 HOWARD RD WAS APPROXIMATED; ACTUAL ELEYATION OF EXISTING INVERT AND PIPE SIZE TO BE FIELD
NEUSE RIVER RULE IMPACT SUMMARY VERIFIED.
STREAM IMPACT LENGTH= 141 LF (ALONG CENTERLINE) = 5. ANY LAND SUBJECTED TO INCLREASED WATER
\ ZONE 1 IMPACT AREA - 5851 SF p_ LEVELS SHALL BE DESIGNATED AS "FL000 w STORAGE AREAS" AND DELINEATED AND RECORDED
,7 ZONE 2 IMPACT AREA = 4129 SF Q IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 10-3057 OF THE
~ ~ ~ NOTE: AREAS INCLUDE FILL SLOPES/STONE ~ CITY CODE. O 6. LOT DIMENSIONS ARE APPROXIMATE.
~ I I/ ~ z4- - I ~ ~ r ~ ~ ~ I ~ 7. A CONDITION OF APPROVAL OF THIS PLAN WILL
z I ~ i I BE THAT THE OWNER SUBMIT A PETITION FOR ANNEXATION AFTER THE APPROVAL OF THE
~ 1 Q a PRELIMINARY PLAN, AND RIOR TO RECORDING OF
1 • ~ ~ ~ N/F L01 4, PHASE 3 , ~ I - ~ a PA K YN WOOOS S D ~ ^ ROAD CROSSING #2 LOT OR ISSUANCE OF ANY CONSTRUCTION PERMITS.
~ 2 m S ~ O / , NEUSE RIVER RULE IMPACT SUMMARY CONTACT KAREN DUKE ®890-3656. VICINITY MAP n.t.s. 8. NEUSE RIVER TRIBUTARIES EXIST ON THE
3 r I / 40 11 I STREAM IMPACT = 136 LF (ALONG CENTERLINE) PROPERTY. APPLICATION FOR PERMIT TO CROSS
m 24 I i ~ l ~ ZONE 1 IMPACT AREA = 4062 SF TWO NRBR STREAMS (SECTION 401) IS MADE TO ZONE 2 IMPACT AREA - 2765 SF NCDENR-DWQ. PERMIT PENDING.
I m ~ 58 3 8 I ~ ~ ~ \ 8 844 ~ ~ 9. THE SITE HAS BEEN INVESTIGATED FOR THE NOTE: AREAS INCLUDE FILL SLOPES/STONE PRESENCE OF WETLANDS BY COOPER
~ , ENVIRONMENTAL, INC., 2300 SARDIS ROAD NORTH
I S ~ ~ - N ~ ~4 4 ~ ~ f cr , , SUITE q, CHARLOTTE NC 28227. PHONE
~ \ .o , 3 ,a E " , ~ 8~ 6 .6 8 ~ ~ 704.845.2000. NO SECTION 404 WETLANDS EXIST BEYOND TOP OF BANK, AS INDICATED.
Q ~ 10. CURRENT PROPERTY OWNER; KARAM, MICHAEL
8 0 1 1 " ~ _ ~ ~ N F GERALD T. LUTZ 1• ~ a 8 E 431 ' ~ ~ I DB 4508 PG 464 Q. & MARY, 82 11. THE BUILDING CONTRACTOR SHALL BE
ry ~ , - i0 slo I RESPONSIBLE TD VERIFY ALL BUILDING SETBACK
~ E AR N/F T, P. RINGLAN ' I DB 6199 PG 8 4 ~ - REQUIREMENTS WITH THE INSPECTIONS DEPARTMENT. 12. COUNTOURS, SOILS AND PLANIMETRICS SHOWN
W ~2~ ~ . ~ , ARE FROM WAKE COUNTY MAPS AND ARE
1 1 ~ '4' ~ • ~ 19256 SF \ \ / ~ o ~ 2 \ A / I I SUMMARY APPROXIMATE.
1 (~Q SF o r , ~ , ~ o ~ / ~ 13. ALL LOTS TO BE RECORDED AT ONCE. NO PHASING IS PROPOSED.
~ M ~ ~ 11250 SF '~<F~ ~ 3 1. TOTAL AREA: 6.39 ACRES
\ ~ ~ , \ - •0 ~ - - ~ ~ ~ 2. TOTAL NUMBER OF LOTS: 15 EA
2 20 ~ 1 F \ FT & _ e 26~ S 16 ~ ~ - B _
R s o 0 a io A - ~ '00~ BFE 369.5 r` S 13261 S ARD ~ T 3. WAKE COUNTY P.I.N.: 0797.05-19-0179
- ~ ~ o ~ L 20 PueL 4. DENSITY: 2.35 UNITS PER ACRE
11 - _
X ~ i 5. STREET RIGHT-OF-WAY: 1.1 AC
W - J ~ 6. MINIMUM /AVERAGE LOT SIZE: 10890 SF / 15362 SF
~ o '.I ~ 294 ' ~ ti 15 `,d ~ ~ 17432 SF MINIMUM LOT WIDTH 65 FT
N 84'25' 14" ~ °j BFE 370.3 / MINIMUM CORNER LOT WIDTH 80 FT
• ~ W 91. ~ 0 1 9 0 / o o . . s• 1~, o MINIMUM LOT DEPTH 100 FT
o~ , REQUIRED SETBACKS
STORMWATER OUTFACE . • ~ ti' / 5 CONC. SW / / , FRONT YARD 20 FT, REAR YARD 30 FT, AGGREGATE 40 FT ~ 510E YARD 10 FT, CORNER 510E YARD 20 FT, AGGREGATE 20 FT
f I SHALL BE OUTSIDE OF / , • • , ~ - - r RIPARIAN BUFFER ~ ~
0P / I ~ ~ . ~ 7, PART OF AN APPROVED SUBDIVISION; CLIFTON HILLS, WAKE COUNTY
85 LF GUARDRAIL W , ~ / 1 ~ ~ 1 J •A 8. ZONING: PROPOSED R-4 SINGLE FAMILY
~ OR 3 HIGH WALL / ~ zs.oo ~ - f J ~ 100 YR FLOOD g. INSIDE CITY LIMITS;
~ I U ~ 60 LF RET WALL ~ m _ ~ ~ , STORAGE BNDY PENDING ANNEXATION
HEIGHT VARIES J 40.00' a / = • ~ - 10. INSIDE PRIMARY FIRE DISTRICT: NO INDEX
0 /w y~~l ~ I i• CE-1 SUBDIVISION PLAN 11. INSIDE FALLS, PERRY CREEK, OR SWIFT CREEK DRAINAGE AREA: NO CE-2 RINGLAND ROAD P&P
/ ~ ~ 'f ~ ~ 24 TH. CL. 1 RIPRAP APRON ~ o ~ 5 f ~ o I 14
~ ~ ~ i CL. 1 RIPRAP CHNNL ~ 30660 SF i' 12. INSIDE FLOOD HAZARD BOUNDARY: NO CE-3 EROSION CONTROL PLAN CE-4 OUTFACE A & B, STUB ROAD
~ rn o 21304 SF ~ LINING TO EL 368.60 ~ 13. FLOOR AREA RATIO: N/A X-1 CROSS SECTIONS 10+00-13+00
- Qj o ~ / BFE 3 ~ ~ (TO TOP OF BANK) ~ 14. OMIT X-2 CROSS SECTIONS 13+60.17+00
~z , • ~ ~ . / i / / w ~ ~ x-3 CROSS sECTIONS 17+50-19+50
/ N/F M. KIM AND STEVEN L, RICHARDSON ' / A ' LOT LINE TYP. 15. DEDICATED GREENWAY: NONE DTL-1 STREET DETAILS )
/ ~ ~ , ~ ~ DB 6625 PG 265 ~ ~ / ~ ~ ~ O DTL-2 UTILITY DETAILS 16. DEVELOPER: STONEHAVEN LLC, 7200 STONEHENGE DR. #306, RALEIGH NC 27603, PH. 919-870-1262 DTL-3 EROSION CONTROL DETAILS
I ~ ~ / ~ i r^ ~
/ o 17. DB 2877 PAGE 0624
r l - 1 i ~ L'_~ i' ~ / NCDENR-DWQ R~VIgION Relocate Storm Discharge 8 31 D1 4 / /
~ I 81 58 O ~ ~ N/F KEVI G. PEREZ I 6 Q E / DB 42 PG 707 Revise Channel Lining Detail
gg I ~ , a3 0 ~ / Z NCDENR-DW REVISION 1 ; R 1 ,
/ I } 0 - ~ 11 ~r O - / / EX. 12 PUBLIC SS O Delete Lot #6 8/21 /01 I: ~ a
/ ~ ~ ,6 3 / - NCDENR-DW REVISION ~ O 7/25/01 _ . Revise Roadway Alignment
T ~ / \ / 50 UFFER ~
92 32 J ~ ~ \ ~ e ~ 10964 SF r i ~ ZONE 2 ~~.U R/W R W ~ Q 1 COR COMMENTS s/a/o1
/ ' a„ / / / / / ~ N/F GAIL EL SS SMT l / 45' WITH SIDEWALK 40' WITHOUT SIDEWALK Z
r DB 7832 G 8 ~ ,a -~'U / RIGHT OF WAY Z No. R Date evlslon/Issue
I ZONE 1 ~ / ~ 0 1.0' 5.0' 3.5' 26.0' 3.5' _ V
- / w / ~ ~ TOP BANK - - 24" TH. CL. 1 RIPRAP J T! ~ LI~C CL. 1 RIPRAP APRON SIDEWALK uTIUTY sTRla ROADWAY MIN. W Q.' TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERS AND SITE PLANNERS
( ~ o 2.5' 10.5' 10.5' 2.5' Q 16 Chancery Place, Durham NC 27707
I ~ 12 ' - - 2: ~ MAX. Phone or Fax [phone]
, TOP BANK ~ ~ ~ . / ~ ~ ~ N N ~ 836 SF a Email rescottddQminde rin .com P P 9
\ ~ ~ r i ~ ZONE 1 ~ R~ ~ µaululp, O CAR ~~i
/ l ~ z N + So . ~ / PAVEMENT DESIGN ~ ~ Z Q ~ • ••SS~~ ~
45 4 , o .•oFE ~oN...~ 0 RI GHT F 0 WAY
ONE 2 ~ N CL. 1 / ~ o • ~ N I CL. 1 RIPRAP CHNNL 6" A.B.C.--40' ROW SECTION ~ S A „ 26 ROA I E L . DWAY SECT.ON
/ 50 BUFFER- • ~ • 37.50 1 N/F WILLIAM C FRITTER LINING N/F MICHAEL P. SAVILLE ~ ~ DB 3528 PG 50 (TO T) LINING TO EL 369.70 8 A.B.C.--45 ROW SECTION 22508
\ DB 7646 PG 381 3 N I TYPCI (TO TOP OF BANK) $ s TYPICAL BOTH SIDES NOTE: NORMAL CROWN OF 1/4" PER g•'FNGINEE`~'~
7 6 ~ 2• ' co \ \ / 3 11 FOOT UNLESS OTHERWISE DIRECTED ~ F~ ~
\ 19065 SF / I '~i, SAN • R~ BY CITY ENGINEER. bql P I~~~a Ipppl
S ~ ~ ~ V11077 SF
ST MWATER 0 TF ~o I ~i OR U ALL _ 1 Project Name and Address
SHALL BE OUTSIDE OF ~ 8 ~ 0 _ 1 5 ~ , - RIPARIAN BUFFER 65 6 r
11178 SF ~ ~ 1 I
_ 10 } - - _
114 F ~ I UTILITY INSTALLATIONS AND OTHER PUBLIC
~ 11214 SF I 26 S / I / ~ ~ ~ „ FACILITIES, INCLUDING SIDEWALKS AND HANDICAP 8200 KNEBWORTH COURT 30 STD. CONC. C&G RAMPS ARE TO BE CONSTRUCTED ON ALL STREETS
N/F JAMES M. BRANNON r~ AS SPECIFIED BY CITY CODE. THESE FACILITIES CITY OF RALEIGH
DB 4713 P 867 ~ ~ ~ G I ~ ~ i r 385.1 ' ~ i HAVE BEEN APPROVED BY THE CITY OF RALEIGH WAKE COUNTY RIGHT-OF-WAY (TYP.) AND SHALL BE SO INSTALLED N NORTH CAROLINA
I \ ~ 3 ~ ~ N/F EDWARJYJ. UNGEMACH N $3'03' U LESS A CHANGE
5 \ DB 7450 G 838 4 ~l IS AUTHORIZED BY WRITTEN APPROVAL. PUBLIC SANITARY SEWER EASEMENTS ARE TO BE RECORDED
PRIOR TO FINAL ACCEPTANCE.
I / 1 N/F KENNETH B. LAWSON JR. I DB 7831 PG 190 t DBF7623HPGIg48S KISER t SIGNATURE; Drawing sheet
/ ~ N/F CHARLES E. BUCHANA \ ~ DB 6352 PG 700
~ \ ~ ~ SUBDIVISION CHIEF ENGINEER
/ , Doie PLAN
5.~ .1 DIR. OF PUBLIC UTILITIES
TRAFFIC ENGINEER s°° ale 111=50'
CONSERVATION ENGINEER
0 50 100 150 200

EXISTING RINGLAND ROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY
SHOWN AS HATCHED AREA PER WAKE CO. MAP
GENERAL NOTES
KEYSTONE RETAINING WALL 0 Q
0 1. BOUNDARY INFORMATION WAS TAKEN FROM A
m MAP PREPARED BY PEACOCK LAND SURVEYING,
o BENSON, NC, 27504, MAP N0. 99-0816-C, AND KNEBWOR H o! REPRODUCED BY S.D. PUCKETT ASSOCIATES,
~ DURHAM NC. EXISTING IRON PINS WERE FIELD
O CHECKED AND SHALL BE PROPERLY INDICATED ON
Q ~ THE FINAL PLAT. - 0 0 2. CITY OF RALEIGH SUBDIVISION ~S 44-O1
D! w 3. STREET TOPOGRAPHY WAS OBTAINED BY AN } ~ ACTUAL FIELD SURVEY BY S.D. PUCKETT
Q ASSOCIATES, DURHAM NC.
~ 4. DOWNSTREAM SS MH EXISTING INFORMATION
HOWARD RD WAS APPROXIMATED; ACTUAL ELEVATION OF ROAD CROSSING #1 EXISTING INVERT AND PIPE SIZE TO BE FIELD
NEUSE RIVER RULE IMPACT SUMMARY VERIFIED.
STREAM IMPACT LENGTH= 141 LF ALONG CENTERLINE = 5. ANY LAND SUBJECTED TO INCLREASED WATER ) c~ LEVELS SHALL BE DESIGNATED AS FLOOD
v ~ ~ ~ ZONE 1 IMPACT AREA = 5851 SF w STORAGE AREAS" ANO DELINEATED AND RECORDED
ZONE 2 IMPACT AREA = 4129 SF a IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 10-3057 OF THE
~ 11 \ ~ , NOTE: AREAS INCLUDE FILL SLOPES/STONE ~ CITY CODE. 0 6. LOT DIMENSIONS ARE APPROXIMATE.
~ ~ I/ i \ ~ ~ ~ 7. A CONDITION OF APPROVAL OF THIS PLAN WILL BE THAT THE OWNER SUBMIT A PETITION FOR
1 ~ ~ ' ANNEXATION AFTER THE APPROVAL OF THE
2 I ~ ~ J ~ ~ ~ ~a ~ ~ 1 PRELIMINARY PLAN, AND RIOR TO RECORDING OF
Q T am ~ ~ I / N/F LOT 4, PHASE 3 . i ROAD CROSSING 2 LOT OR ISSUANCE OF ANY CONSTRUCTION PERMITS. CONTACT KAREN DUKE ®89D-3656.
r- ~ PARKLYN WOODS S/D 4 ~ ~ I \ ~ ~ ~ NEUSE RIVER RULE IMPACT SUMMARY VICINITY MAP n.t.s. 8. NEUSE RIVER TRIBUTARIES EXIST ON THE
/ I I34 I STREAM IMPACT = 136 LF (ALONG CENTERLINE) PROPERTY. APPLICATION FOR PERMIT TO CROSS
4 2 i I ~ m ~ 4 e I ~ ZONE 1 IMPACT AREA - 40fi2 SF TWO NRBR STREAMS (SECTION 401) IS MADE TO NCDENR-DWQ. PERMIT PENDING.
~ ~ ~ 58 38 8 I i - 1 , ~ ZONE 2 IMPACT AREA = 2765 SF 9. THE SITE HAS BEEN INVESTIGATED FOR THE ~ NOTE: AREAS INCLUDE FILL SLOPES STONE PRESENCE OF WETLANDS BY COOPER
. s/g4 ~ Z° i , , / ENVIRONMENTAL, INC., 2300 SARDIS ROAD NORTH
c~ ~ 4 4 ~ 3 8„ ~ ,1 ~ SUITE Q, CHARLOTTE NC 28227. PHONE
~ 76 8 ~ ~i~ l~ 704.645.2000. NO SECTION 404 WETLANDS EXIST BEYOND TOP OF BANK, AS INDICATED.
\ I ~ 10. CURRENT PROPERTY OWNER: KARAM, MICHAEL
I 5 81 ~ ,i ~ j N/F GERALD T. LUTZ 8 0 18 ~ ~ 1. ~ 0 ~ E 431 8, ~ DB 4508 PG ae4 LUTZ Q. & MARY, 82 ea 11. THE BUILDING CONTRACTOR SHALL BE
lI, ~ RESPONSIBLE TO VERIFY ALL BUILDING SETBACK
~l ~ \ - 1 O~~E N F T.P. RINGLAN BAR DB 6199 PG B \ REQUIREMENTS WITH THE INSPECTIONS DEPARTMENT. 12. COUNTOURS, SOILS AND PLANIMETRICS SHOWN
ARE FROM WAKE COUNTY MAPS AND ARE
a 1 ~ •4 \ 19256 SF \ \ ~ APPROXIMATE. SUMMARY 13. ALL LOTS TO BE RECORDED AT ONCE. NO
n 2 ~ A i 'O / I I ~ ~ O Leli \ i ~ ti Q / ~ • ~ 1 070 5F ~ I ~ ~ ` / PHASING IS PROPOSED.
o ~c ~r, / ~ ~ ~ \ 11250 SF l F~ ~ 3 / 1. TOTAL AREA: 6.39 ACRES
` 2. TOTAL NUMBER OF LOTS: 15 EA
20 FT 126.$ SF 16 ~ , ~ - g z ~ -S~o o • so . ~
R ~ BFE ~ 0 369.5 A AR ~ 13261 0 S S~ o T 3. WAKE COUNTY P.I.N.: 0797.05-19-0179
\ w ~ L PUBLIC UTI t_ O 4. DENSITY: 2.35 UNITS PER ACRE
~ L ESMT
~ / - _ O.DO 5. STREET RIGHT-OF-WAY: 1.1 AC
x ~ w ~ 6, MINIMUM /AVERAGE LOT SIZE: 1 D890 SF / 15362 SF
~ 294 ' 0 ti 15 1 ^ ~ 74 1 17432 SF MINIMUM LOT WIDTH 65 FT
°j BFE 370.3 N 84'25' 14'• MINIMUM CORNER LOT WIDTH BO FT
~ W 91.89' 0 p 0 p ~ MINIMUM LOT DEPTH 1 DO FT
9'21'' 0 , 0 ~ REQUIRED SETBACKS
I o0o Qti ~ ~ ~ oo ~ FRONT YARD 20 FT, REAR YARD 30 FT, AGGREGATE 40 FT SIDE YARD 10 FT, CORNER SIDE YARD 20 FT, AGGREGATE 20 FT
5 CONC. SW Q
_ I I ~0 ~ ~ _ I ~ / gP ~ / i ~ 7. PART OF AN APPROVED SUBDIVISION: CLIFTON HILLS, WAKE COUNTY
~ 85 LF GUARDRAIL 0~ ~ OQ ti W . ~ ~ ~ ~ 8, ZONING: PROPOSED R-4 SINGLE FAMILY
/ OR 3 HIGH WALL ti ~ - ~ ~ o0 26.00 ~ - 100 YR FLOOD y INSIDE CITY LIMITS: PEN~'NG ^NP!EXATION
~ ( N/F M. KIM AND STEVEN L. .~.:HARDSON STORAGE BNDY
~ DB 6625 PG 265 V m i~ - 40.00' a - , _ ~ 10. INSIDE PRIMARY FIRE DISTRICT: NO INDEX
i ( I~ ~ 11. INSIDE FA PE RY CE-1 SUBDIVISION PLAN LLS, R CREEK, OR SWIFT CREEK DRAINAGE AREA: NO CE-2 RINGLAND ROAD P&P
'•I l ~ ~o ~ 5 (
-"4 CE-3 EROSION CONTROL PLAN 12. INSIDE FLOOD HAZARD BOUNDARY: NO CE-4 OUTFACE A & B, STUB ROAD
~ / , / ~ ~ 30660 SF ~ ~ rn o ~ • 21304 SF 13. FLOOR AREA RATIO: N/A x-1 CR05S SECTIONS 10+00-13+00
~ ~ ' ~ ~ o ~ BFE 3 , gj ~ / ~ / ~ 14. OMIT X-2 CROSS SECTIONS 13+60-17+00
~ i Z , ~ / x-3 CROSS sECTlonls 17+50-19+50
i / ~ W / LOT LINE (TYP.) 15. DEDICATED GREENWAY: NONE DTL-1 STREET DETAILS
I i / ' ' ~ / \ , ~ \ / 16. DEVELOPER: STONEHAVEN LLC 7200 STONEHENGE DR. 306 RALEIGH NC 27603 PH. 919-870-1262 DTL-2 UTILITY DETAILS
# DTL-3 EROSION CONTROL DETAILS
/ 1 ; ' 11. D8 2877 PAGE 0624
~ ~ ~ trD
\ ~ S 81.5$ » O ~ N/F KEV G. PEREZ 6 E 0
I 8 ~ DB 42 PG 707 I 8.a3' o ~ ~ ~ Z NCDENR-DWQ REVISION 3 B/21/Dt O DELETE LOT #6
0 - ~ I ti~ o ~ / /
EX. 12 PUBLIC SS 0 / ~ ~ - ,6 13 r\ / _ NCDENR-DWQ REVISIONS 7/za/ot
/ 50 UFFER ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ / ~ D R/W R/W ~
92.92 J ~ v ~ ~ ° ~ a~, i 10964 5F Q 1 COR COMMENTS s/e/ot
\ ZONE 2 ~•o ~ m ~ g.. ~ 'Q2 / Q / / \ N/F GAIL EL SS MT c ~ ~ 45' WITH SIDEWALK 40' WITHOUT SIDEWALK Z
DB 7832 G B ~ ~ l~ / RIGHT OF WAY ~ Z No. Revisi n I e Date 0 / SSU
, ZONE 1 ,~l~ ~ I l w ~ ~ 0 1.0' 5.0 3.5 26,0 3.5 U TT~
~ / J ~ TOP BANK ~ - - ROADWAY ~ ~ J..1J..14 SIDEWALK UTILITY STRIP MIN.
/ ~ ( o _ N 1n ~ / / 2.5' 1 . ' W ~ TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERS AND SITE PLANNERS 0 5 10.5 2.5 O 16 Chancery Place, Durham NC 27707
/ ~l I I 12 \ 2:1 MAX. V. Phone or Fax [phone]
I TOP BANK ~ ~ 836 SF / ~ I i N N 7 ~ ~ ~ Email rescottddOminda rin .com P P 9 I- ~nann
~ ~ ~ ~ R ~ ~ ~ , \ i \ ZONE 1 3s I ~~h~i 0 ~ CA~p
~ / _ • • 19065 SF . • - 0 - - PAVEMENT DESIGN Z ~ • '•53~~ ~ ii 45 40 , o FE ~o ~ . RIGHT OF
/ I ,iii o ~ . ~ ~ N WAY
ONE 2 o i ~ a i ~ ~ N 6~~ A.B.C.--40' ROW SECTION ~ ~ 26 ROADWAY SECT ~ ~ . ION SEAL 8 A.B.C.--45 ROW SECTION
50 BUFFER T ' , . ~ • ' 37.50 ~ N/F WILLIAM C FRITTER ~ ~ DB 3528 PG 50 $ 22508
1~ N I : ~ NOTE; NORMAL CROWN OF 1 /4 PER •.,FN E~,.
\ 36, co 2.~ ~ ~ I FOOT UNLESS OTHERWISE DIRECTED ~48~ .~INE,,
\ \ / 3 11 _ / BY CITY ENGINEER. ~~4~qN . R~ anuN
N F MICHAEL P. SAVILLE ~ \ / ~ ~ I ~ DB 7646 Pc 361 ~ S ~ ~ V11077 SF
~o I ~i ~ / 8 ~ ~ 0 ~ Project Name and Address
1 5 _ _ 65• 6
11178 SF I
~ I I ~ 114 F _ i 11214 SF ) 26 S / ~ UTILITY INSTALLATIONS AND OTHER PUBLIC
- ~ / „ FACILITIES, INCLUDING SIDEWALKS AND HANDICAP 8200 KNEBWORTH COURT 30 STD. CONC. C&G RAMPS ARE TO BE CONSTRUCTED ON ALL STREETS
i _ ~ ~ ~ N/F JAMES M. BRANNON ~C~>/ ~ AS SPECIFIED BY CITY CODE. THESE FACILITIES CITY OF RALEIGH
~ DB 4713 PG 867 ~J ~ ~ ~ / I I , \ ~ r 385.13 HAVE BEEN APPROVED BY THE CITY OF RALEIGH WAKE COUNTY RIGHT-OF-WAY (TYP.) AND SHALL BE SO INSTALLED UNLESS A CH NORTH CAROLINA
i \ ~ N/F EDWARjYJ. UNGEMACH N $ ~ ) ANGE
S 03 5 \ , \ DB 7450 G 83B 4 w ) IS AUTHORIZED BY WRITTEN APPROVAL. PUBLIC SANITARY SEWER EASEMENTS ARE TO BE RECORDED
PRIOR TO FINAL ACCEPTANCE.
~ ~ i N/F KENNETH 8. LAWSON JR. ~ N CATHERINE M. KISER 1 DB 7631 PG 190 ' pB 7623 PG 9485 SIGNATURE; Drawing Sheet
I N/F CHARLES E, BUCHANA
\ ( DB 6352 PG 700 \ \ \ I ~ ~ ~ SUBDIVISION CHIEF ENGINEER
~ ~ ~ ~ / 1 \ , Date PLAN
5.1 1 DIR. OF PUBLIC UTILITIES
TRAFFIC ENGINEER s°° a 11
CONSERVATION ENGINEER
0 50 100 150 200

EXISTING RINGLAND ROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY
SHOWN AS HATCHED AREA PER WAKE CO. MAP
GENERAL NOTES p
KEYSTONE RETAINING WALL a
~ 1. BOUNDARY INFORMATION WAS TAKEN FROM A m MAP PREPARED BY PEACOCK LAND SURVEYING,
p BENSON, NC, 27504, MAP N0. 99-0816-C, AND
KNEBWOR H ~ REPRODUCED BY S.D. PUCKETT ASSOCIATES, ~ DURHAM NC. EXISTING IRON PINS WERE FIELD
o CHECKED AND SHALL BE PROPERLY INDICATED ON
p ~ THE FINAL PLAT. Q p 2. CITY OF RALEIGH SUBDIVISION ~5-44-01
~ w 3. STREET TOPOGRAPHY WAS OBTAINED BY AN
} ~ ACTUAL FIELD SURVEY BY S.D. PUCKETT
Q v ASSOCIATES, DURHAM NC. ~ 4. DOWNSTREAM SS MH EXISTING INFORMATION
HOWARD RD WAS APPROXIMATED; ACTUAL ELEVATION OF
ROAD CROSSING #1 EXISTING INVERT AND PIPE SIZE TO BE FIELD
NEUSE RIVER RULE IMPACT SUMMARY VERIFIED. 5. ANY LAND SUBJECTED TO INCLREASED WATER
STREAM IMPACT LENGTH= 141 LF (ALONG CENTERLINE) ~ LEVELS SHALL BE DESIGNATED AS "FLOOD ZONE 1 IMPACT AREA = 5851 SF w STORAGE AREAS" AND DELINEATED AND RECORDED
~ ~ ~ . ZONE 2 IMPACT AREA = 4129 SF Q IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 10-3057 OF THE
NOTE: AREAS INCLUDE FILL SLOPES/STONE ~ CITY CODE. p 6. LOT DIMENSIONS ARE APPROXIMATE.
l/ ~ i i ~ 7, A CONDITION OF APPROVAL OF THIS PLAN WILL
\ ~ ~ / ~ I I/ ~ I i ~ BE THAT THE OWNER SUBMIT A PETITION FOR
~ ~ ANNEXATION AFTER THE APPROVAL OF THE PRELIMINARY PLAN, AND RIOR TO RECORDING OF
z I J -n ~ / ~ as \ ~ \ Q ~ i I LOT OR ISSUANCE OF ANY CONSTRUCTION PERMITS.
~ j N/F LOT 4, PHASE 3 a~ ~ ROAD CROSSING #2 CONTACT KAREN DUKE ®890-3656. NEUSE RIVER RULE IMPACT SUMMARY VICINITY MAP n.t.s. 8. NEUSE RIVER TRIBUTARIES EXIST ON THE
~ PARKLYN WOODS S/D ~o ~ ~ / ~ ~ ~m l STREAM IMPACT - 136 LF (ALONG CENTERLINE) PROPERTY. APPLICATION FOR PERMIT TO CROSS
/ Zo ~ ~ _ ,Q s / ~ X340, I , NE 1 IMPACT AREA - 40fi2 SF TWO NRBR STREAMS (SECTION 401) IS MADE TO ZO - NCDENR-DWQ. PERMIT PENDING.
/ 2 i l ~ m ~ 4 E I ~ ~ ZONE 2 IMPACT AREA = 2765 SF 9. THE SITE HAS BEEN INVESTIGATED FOR THE
l,g, 3, - ~ ~ \ I Q1 / 8 38 84 ,I ~ J ~ ~ ~ NOTE; AREAS INCLUDE FILL SLOPES/STONE PRESENCE OF WETLANDS BY COOPER ENVIRONMENTAL, INC., 2300 SARDIS ROAD NORTH
Z° i SUITE Q, CHARLOTTE NC 28227. PHONE
704.845.2D00. NO SECTION 404 WETLANDS EXIST
~ ~ 3. f ~ ~ 0 87 _ 68 BEYOND TOP OF BANK, AS INDICATED. 10. CURRENT PROPERTY OWNER: KARAM, MICHAEL
-___-6 _ ~s~ _ ~ \ S 8]' ~ ~ i N F GERALD T. LUTZ Q. & MARY, 82
8J ~ ]8 ~ ^ ~ ~ ,I DB 45D8 PG 464 .1 c~ ~ E 431, g l 11. THE BUILDING CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE TO VERIFY ALL BUILDING SETBACK
~ _ 1, Q~ O ~ ry`0 z_ r _D si ~ ODE qR N/F T.P. RINGLAN REQUIREMENTS WITH THE INSPECTIONS DEPARTMENT.
4 ~ ~ DB 6199 PG 8 - 12. COUNTOURS, SOILS AND PLANIMETRICS SHOWN ARE FROM WAKE COUNTY MAPS AND ARE
1 W 24 • 1 , APPROXIMATE.
1 1 ,4, I 1 ~ A 19256 SF ~ \ \ / ~ I ~ e 2 ~ ~ ~ / SUMMARY 13. ALL LOTS TO BE RECORDED AT ONCE. NO PHASING IS PROPOSED.
1 ~ SF L ~ , ~ 3 /
o ~ ~ ~ ~ 11250 SF ~ < FS\ ~ ~ , ` / 1. TOTAL AREA: 6.39 ACRES
~ n~ ,~~0 \ ~ \ r- ~ ~ co , co ~ 2. TOTAL NUMBER OF LOTS: 15 EA
. / \ 3 " ~ ~ ~ 126 SF ~ 2 ~ 0 20 FT ~ ~ G 16 ~ ~ ~ 3. WAKE COUNTY P.I.N.: 0797.05-19-0179
B - ` , ah' SID ~ BFE 369.5 ~ n R a ~ O - RD ~ A 13261 S o D S T
~ L LIC Uill ESM ~ _ ~ r 4. DENSITY: 2.35 UNITS PER ACRE
_ ~ 11 ~ - ~ 5. STREET RIGHT-OF-WAY: 1.1 AC
_ O.oo \ i _ / -
k W ~ ~r ~ 6. MINIMUM /AVERAGE LOT SIZE: 10890 SF / 15362 SF
/ ~ 0 15 ~ 294 ` ~ ti 17432 5F ~ ~ .74 1 ~ MINIMUM LOT WIDTH 65 FT
N • „ BFE 370.3 . 84 25 1 ~ . 4 W ~ 91 0 MINIMUM CORNER LOT WIDTH 80 FT MINIMUM LOT DEPTH 100 FT
9 0 0 p . . p s•1 0, o REQUIRED SETBACKS
~ FRONT YARD 20 FT, REAR YARD 30 FT, AGGREGATE 40 FT
I STORMWATER OUTFACE ~~ti ~ , ~ 5 CO C. SW I / . . I I SIDE YARD 10 FT, CORNER SIDE YARD 20 FT, AGGREGATE 20 FT
SHALL BE OUTSIDE OF 0 ~ I I ~ ~ 7. PART OF AN APPROVED SUBDIVISION; CLIFTON HILLS, WAKE COUNTY
- _ I RIPARIAN BUFFER ~ / / I 0P ~ .
~ ~ w 85 LF GUARDRAIL 8. ZONING: PROPOSED R-4 SINGLE FAMILY
OR 3 HIGH WALL ~ o F 4 1 _ J ~ ~ / 100 YR FL000 9, INSIDE CITY LIMITS: PENDING ANNEXATION
I ~ ~ / , ~ m 60 LF RET WALL ~ , J• STORAGE BNDY 10. INSIDE PRIMARY FIRE DISTRICT: NO INDEX
HEIGHT VARIES ~ W 40.00' a ~ CE-1 SUBDNISION PLAN
,0 / - I ~ ~ : ~ ~ 11. INSIDE FALLS, PERRY CREEK, OR SWIFT CREEK DRAINAGE AREA: NO CE-2 RINGLAND ROAD P&P
~ o ~ 14 / ~ 24" TH. CL. 1 RIPRAP APRON ' S / ~ o 12. INSIDE FLOOD HAZARD BOUNDARY; NO CE-3 ERC?SION CONTROL PLAN
i CE-4 OUTFACE A & B, STUB ROAD
~ i i CL. 1 RIPRAP CHNNL M ~ 30660 SF o / 21304 SF _ ~ / ' / LINING TO EL 368.60 0 ~ BFE 3 / 13. FLOOR AREA RATIO, N/A x-1 CROSS sECnONS 10+00-13+00 X-2 CROSS SECTIONS 13+60-17+00
~ / ~ ~ ~ ~ (TO TOP OF BANK) ~ ~ ~ 14. OMIT • x-3 CROSS SECTIONS 17+50-19+50
i / i ~ , 3 15. DEDICATED GREENWAY: NONE DTL-1 STREET DETAILS
i / ~ w / r N/F M. KIM AND STEVEN L. RICH,4RD50N / i / , ~ d. LOT LINE (TYP.) DTL-2 UTILITY DETAILS
~ ~ DB 6625 PG 265 ~ ~ p ~ / ~ 16. DEVELOPER: STONEHAVEN LLC, 7200 STONEHENGE DR. #306, RALEIGH NC 27603, PH. 919-870-1262 DTL-3 EROSION CONTROL DETAILS
I / i r to p / 17. DB 2877 PAGE Ofi24 µ~.v
~ ~ ~ qq~ ~ ~ / NCDENR-DWQ REVISION , Relocate Storm Discharge 8/31/01
~ ' / ~ ~i / 4 Revise Channel Lining Detail
I 5 81'58• „ Q ~ ~ N/F KEVI G. PEREZ ~ ~ 6 E 0 / DB 42 PG 707 Z NCDENR-DWQ REVISION 8/21/01 ~ t~
I 3 0 - / 0 Delete Lot ~6 tiw o o
/ I ti° o / ~ / NCDENR-DWQ REVISION 7 25 01 ~
y ~ EX. 12 PUBLIC SS ~ ~ / _ ~ , / \ - / ~ Revise Roadwa Ali nment / / IX N~ Y 9 i fi, Li. ~ ,
/ - -6 3 / 50 UFFER ~ ~ r ~ ~ \ g232 ~ .I ~ / ~ R W R W ~ seD1 1 COR COMMENTS / / Q
ZONE 2 er~c. ~ i 10964 SF ~ 45' WITH SIDEWALK 40' WITHOUT SIDEWALK Z,
/ \ N F GAIL EL & S SMr ? ~ / ~ / / ~ / s ~ Z RIGHT GF WAY No. Revision/Issue Date
~ DB 7632 G 8 / ~ ~ / ~ 0
ZONE 1 ~ ~ ~ / w / ~ I „ ' 3.5' 26.0' 3.5' - ~ 1.0 5.0 J r1.~ L,~
~ ~ ~ / - 24 TH. CL. 1 F ~ ~ TOP BANK o ' TH. CL. 1 RIPRAP APRON SIDEWALK l1TILITY STRIP ROADWAY MIN. W Q.' TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERS AND SITE PLANNERS
/ ( / ~ / 2.5' 10.5' 10.5' 2.5' Q 16 Chancery Place, Durham NC 27707 ~ Phone or Fax [phone]
~ R35.00 ~ ~ TOP BANK - • • ~ ~ • • 836 sF / ~ 2:1 MAX. ~ Email preecottddOmindepring.com • ' F- ~nnnnn
I ~ ~ I ~ N N ~ 0 C A ~a~~i
~ ~ ZONE 1 ~ 3 f ~ Z ~ • • ~ES S% ~ ~ ~~i
~ , r i^~ ~ + s I / ~J i _ PAVEMENT DESIGN • •~oF °H'• : y ~ F WAY r~. 9. s 40 RIGHT 0 45 Q <
o / I _ i i h N 2" I-2 • IPRAP CHNNL ' ? CL. 1 R 6" A.B.C.--40' ROW SECTION SEAL
ONE 2 o ~ a / _ ~ N ~ C110N . WAY SE „ 26 ROAD LINING TO EL 369.70 g A.B.C.--45 ROW SECTION ~ 22508
50' BUFFER T • ' • ' 37.50 ~ ~ DB 35281 PG 50~ITTER • ~ ~ N/F MICHAEL P. SAVILLE ~ N TO TOP OF BANK) ( i •.F
DB 7646 PG 381 3 I TYPICAL BOTH SIDES NOTE: NORMAL CROWN OF 1/4 PER i~~B •.NGINEE.• FOOT UNLESS OTHERWISE DIRECTED ~y~7 ~
2• 3 11 ~i qN P . R,~~~ BY CITY ENGINEER, ~hlunnl?~~
~ ~ ~ I ~ 19065 SF ~ ~ / ~ 11077 SF
Project Name and Address
TORMWATER OUTFACE _ 'o• I / ~ s I 8 0
L BE OUTSIDE OF ~ ~ SHAL ~ / , 5 _ 65~~ 6 - RIPARIAN BUFFER ~ 11178 SF ~ \ ~ I
\ / 10 ~ ~ i I
- ~ - - - ~ ~ 1 UTILITY INSTALLATIONS AND OTHER PUBLIC
~ F \ _ - I 11426 S / ~ ~ 11214 SF ~ ~ FACILITIES, INCLUDING SIDEWALKS AND HANDICAP 8200 KNEBWORTH COURT
~ l 30 STD. CONC. C&G RAMPS ARE TO BE CONSTRUCTED ON ALL STREETS AS SPECIFIED BY CITY CODE. THESE FACILITIES CITY OF RALEIGH
/ N/F JAMES M. BRANNON / C / I HAVE BEEPi APPROVED BY THE CITY OF RALEIGH WAKE COUNTY
~ DB 4713 PG 867 "u ~ ~ ~ I ,yf ~ 38 ~ / 5.]3' RIGHT-OF-WAY {TYP.) AND SHALL. BE SO INSTALLED UNLESS A CHANGE NORTH CAROLINA
i \ I N/F EDWARJYJ. UNGEMACH N 83'Q ~ 3 IS AUTHORIZED BY WRITTEN APPROVAL. PUBLIC
DB 7450 G 638 54 NI \ l SANITARY `EWER EASEMENTS ARE TO BE RECORDED PRIOR TO FINAL ACCEPTANCE.
I ~ 1 SIGNATURE; Drowiny sheet
N F KENNETH B. LAWSON JR. DB 7831 PG 19D , N/F CATHERINE M. KISER l
I ~ j N/F CHARLES E. BUCHANA DB 7623 PG 9485 \ DB 6352 PG 700 SUBDIVISION
~ \ I ~ CHIEF ENGINEER Date PLAN
5.1 1 DIR. OF PUBLIC UTILITIF~
TR6FFIC FNf;INFFR Sccle ~1l1 L~/'\7
CONSERVATION ENGINEER
0 50 100 150 200

y > . ~ ~ g t
, ~ y
_ j ,
,J .-.1 ~ . ~ , y ~
;qqN i _ - ~R _ 1 -
` 3 y., CURVE TAS~.E _,r..~______.__.._--!
` i I CURVE LENGTH RADitIS TANGENT , _ CHORD BRG i?HOh'.D tEN i Aw
r ~ / j ~ f / I ~ I~ I 1 E I ` ~ 1 N~ -~5 'fir"W i(~~i.: ~ w C1 1Q 50 15 t?0 ~ 41'2 '35
~ I i ~ _ ~ RKL~ N 0~5 ! ~ ~ I , / ~ o I ~ ~ 1 ~ C2 129.29 15 UO ;.4'23'(10" - .56'55'19"E ~___i25,32__ I i ~ ~ _ ~ "
/ ~ ~ / i V ~ ~ ~ ~ C5 43 0~ :150 0 f6'2 ' 3 ~ N 3'22'52 W ~ Q2.96 I , ~ ~ _ C6 175.8$. 200..0.. 0'2 '12" ~ dSQO' 0 23"#rW_ _,170 ~7~---
~ ~ ~ 1 C7 I 1311.08 240. 0 '3T" N09'1T ' 26.34 ~ ' ~ 3 8 ~E
I I ! ~ ~ + ~ r' CHAkLES H. du NEMATH T, ~ n , ! ~ oq i t,8 68137 150. 2 67 b0 Nt61T OS 8 1 ~ ` f_____._. u,.._..__ Q
D8 8t 76 PG 216E i~ 1 ~ i ~ . ~ I
~ ~ I / 1l J ~ PIN o~9~o~s_se ~ E I i ~ toT 47 ~ 1 f . r ~ 1
~ ~ ,t f r" ' - ~ ~ ~ ~ i I i ~ ~ 1 ~ M 1 ~ 1 1 ~ + j f ~ f i i ~ a
r ~t ~ ~ ~ ' 1 ~ ~ 1 ~ I ~ ~ I i i ~ S
i a _ ~ ~ ~ - , ; i i I ~ ~ t
~.r` ~ ' ~ ti ~ i I ~ r ~ i. ~ ~ ~ i i
1 1 11 V 1 ` _ ~}ti ~ ~ ~ .:'I a~i 151. r C_ I ~ r ' ~ 1 ~ i v/ '
~ I ~ i ~ rQ~ ~ ~ ' ~ . l ~ A ~9 % ~ t n~a~ns K. ~.ucv ~ ~ RkidGL 1 ~i r
A Q ~ ~ ~ 'A ~ ~ - ~ ' 1 I i ~ ~ ~I~~ / ~ ' f ~ OB X199 G 935 . ' ~~w o 1sos3s , ~ TRIBUTARY 5A ~
\ ,e.; ~ ~ c 1 . ~ NEUSf RIVER RULE IMPACT SUMMARY i i ;
. a I f ~ I i7 ~ ` ~ 'i - ~ II I STREAM IMPACT LENGTH = 115 LF ALONG CENTERLINE ~ ~ ( ) - , ZONE 1 IMPACT ARfA = 5,018 SF ~ '
'~F 1 'i. ~ ~ t ' =-:a..__. _ , `"!'mob. - ~ ~C'~2f1 ~ ~ 1 ~ l ' ~ 3r kA' 'F' - ~ i l ~ i ' ZONE 2 IMPACT AREA = 3,868 SF
' ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~l ~ ~ `F ~ 1 ~ ~ ~ ! , / ~ ~ TWIN-1 ' x fi' H ~ NOTE: AREAS INCLUDE FILL SLOPES/STONE S 0 '
~ -e ~ s a / f 1 ~ _ gip. ; ~ a~ f J 51GN[~ 9Y OTHERS ~ ~ i ~
j - ~ ~ I ~a I ~ ~ a. ~i ~ r ~ ~ . ~ _ , US INV. , ' / ~ I INV. 3.5
q~ _ , . a~; ~ l ~ lC9 N ~ ~ / ' r y' i " ~ A 695'EL 371, ~ ~ i
, h ~ 1 _ i I ky ~ r ~ i
. , ~ ~1 I
- , , , ~ X11 ~ _ ~ ~ 1~~~"6 ~;F / ~ - 1 I ~ , .,q ~ \ j _ rr i i
~ 1 i ? F 7 ~ ~ ail II 4. ~ l~ 1 _ _ ~ ~ \ 8~ 37 i .2~, - 4 ~ ~ - ~ 'j1~ ti ~ t
1 + ~ ~ I ~ ` ~ _ .3 I~ PO$ ~ ~ _
C~ i 1 ~t I ` . 1 - ~ ,r r-_..._-.~..=~",. , ~ ~ ~ 7 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~'1 ? r .r 1111111111 0+ e.. 1 I •..7TJ ff \ 1111 _ f+ ! ~ w..,~ r ~ T ~ M \ I ~ ~ t ^ ~ 1111111111111 „u Holm ~ r ~1 ~ ~ _ tJR SS ESMr '
~ J~l ~ 3
~ . ~ 'i'~ r'V ~ +l~i~-y~~~~ ~ ~ V ~
_ _ . .y, ~ A ! ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ G' ~ ,,,11, I ~ BFr .8 -r~
_ _ , . ~ ~7,c ~ ~ ~ ~ 1,1,1 ~ ~ , _ _ ~ ~ - _ ~ a. _ ~t~ ,1 ~ - _ _ , D ~ 'fit n1 . 9 / ~ L.._
~ ~~~r _ . 111 , ~-.,a..~.. ~ _ ~
.v ~ X111 . , \ r , , ,t ~ - ~ J' i \
~ - ~ It ~ - - _ _ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 1' k
~ ,1 ' i I, ' \ vv, ~ GE?IERAL d~lrlSIiRUC'f10N NOi~
r^- R 45 1E SPREADS w , ; w ~ , _ . / t. ALL G~iS~1RUL`iION SHALL CONFOkM TO THE CURRENT CITY OF RAt~El4H
! ` ~ ~ ~i V I ~ / 291.7, a ; ~ jr STANDARD DETAILS ANO SPECIFICA'tWMS. ~ ;
i r n~..) N 94'2S~ 11. w , x~ I ~ i 1 ti ~ r • ~ , , z- ~ ' 2 All. GUTTER SHOYN NiT16N RI6NT OF MIRY SMALL 8E STAI~ARD 30' / , f E 14.
9t . , ~ r ~ ~ ~ ~ w = ~ ~$s ' ~ I !Q ~ ~ ~ ' CURB AND OUT'TER. i r ' j, 3. A tX)MPIFTE OOIDRONATE LlST1tiG Atlb AUTOCAQ RELEASE 14 DRAM~LG FILE
- ~ ~ ` ~ i t ~ l~ ~ ~ 1 I ~ C w e ~ ~ 7 ~ ' r - I ~ ~ J ~,,,a`""" ~ ARE AVA(IAIRE UPON INQUEST fROM TINS Fri.
r f ~ i ! I ~ ' D~ ~ . ~ f f ~ ~ - ; ~ 4: THE CONTRACTOR SMALL LOCAlE ALL UTStTIES PISOR TO CI~MMIEtiT OF i i ~ ~ . ptApl4lG ACTIVITY'S. CONTACT' ULOtA AT ~•1~00-~2-414 FQR i'~1.~
i ~ ~ ( i I ~ 0 D / s l f ~ 1 / ~ ~ ~ 3 P S , _ ~ ulcAnaN of ulr~ uT~I~S.
s „u1 u \ 5. ALL DIiIQlpONS SfiOwN ARE TO 8At3( OF tXNt9, UNLESS OTH>]!tfMSE STATED ON PLANS;
~ r r ,p ~ ~ o , ~h, ~ 1 ~ 'O : ~ @ 'C' ~ . ~ 6. ALL PAVE~iT ON SITE SMALL 8E t-2 AND 8' AEIC STONE.
,7 ~ . . ~ ~ P ~ ti w ~ . ~ ~ Q.o / ~ 1 ~ , ~ ` ~ ~ - ~ ~ , k1NM,ESS 01HERi119E NQ'IED A~. ~ 9P0"f E~VA110fiS ARE TtiP OF M - ~ ' . _ r ~ ASPHALT OR
r- % ~ i I J 1 ! ~ ~ ~ ~ z" ;r ~ FiMSI~ SPACE. ~ 3 5 _ \ , a SEED ALL AREAS DISRIt~ EtY CI~19~tICTiON, Al>81 Nt>Y WOfCATET) TO EIE
l ' ~ 'V 1 1.~' I _ * / PAVED OR PLANTED, UPON C131~„E"TIOI`I,OF pRAQNC ADTIV4T#11wS; tlSE RE8E1. 3 ~ i ; ~ - \
r i ? ~ I ~ ~ rJ %r ; ~ • ~ , FESCUE N ACCORDANCE wTTM SIt~cINO SpIE oN DETA~ 8NEETS. ~ , 9, WATER MANS SitAtl HA A 4' OF gOVEltt.
~ ~ ~ r ~ ~ - r `~l. rd. u,!>I ANi),'cTE.UEN 1. ~ f ~ ~ ' ~ ~ y RICH 1~D50N ~ ; ~ C ~ ~ / r- ~ ~ ' I ~,7a _ - ' ~ _ - IQ THE TOPOGRAPHY IMA'S t~A'tEQ SY O'iHEIIS. '
C6 8601 1 ~6 „s"~.'. I ~ ~ ~ i ~ ~O PIN C79~098253 ~ W I ~ ~ ii, n1E p~ITRACTOR Ls ~ it~R ~ P'ONIiYE QRAMACrE ro ALL ETCRM ~ l I - ~
f F' + ~ r 3~V5~ S 30053 S~ , ~ sTRUCTtr~s, , C ` ~ ~ 12. AU SANITARY ~MIER SLOPES Ai+MI ~ L MS t~OMPUIID PROIf t~NTER
1- ~ F 37 BFE 372.3 ~ - ~ ~ I i ~ ' ~ OF WIhNOIE YO CE'N1FR OF NAEf1t~ '
' rNnn r.rylr 11W61110N TO ~ I t - e _ i, ~ ~ , • 13. CONSTRUCT ALL SAt6TARY'~R YAERiOLES FLUSH TO FNiAI PAVEI~NT (,'BADE _ ~ SCE 12 (W) x b'~MI)
, ~ Y OTHERS OR fi5 SHO~i N Hdf-PAVEb OOST N E1A~ 6 ' ~ ~ .f i ~ ~ ~ V.3fi.3 ~
r y„ ~ ~ S fN 5 ~ / 14. CONSTRUCT ALL M'Ui11E~11TS 'ill, l SDL NC}~S AS01E FNIAI _ , ~ r J r DS iNU 3fi5.o _ .GRADE. AtCl~10E COST N @A~ !D. ~a. ~ ? +
~ ~ r ~ ,a'µ'~ : / • , . 15. CONTRACTOR SHALL CLEAR AND pith ~TI~ 'ice lI1L Ill .
t. ~,a y ~ ~yy , , 11d rw""~i Yr ~ + y ? ~ y,,, _ 100 yr flood hinge , `j1111~ ` ~ / _ 16. DEVELOPER IS > ~ A61. ~ _ ,
t ~1a w yAya 1x1 ~J ~ y ~,i ~ per flood study} : l ~ ,i,l i ~ ~ , _ _ P~vATE sTR~ts, aR~ ~lnoN r~tt~ rTs>~ 'rtEo Tn
t' swlF iua ~ Yo YaY WI Ya V~ ,,,,y 'a'yy ~ % by Becky Ward/ PE 1j11111 1 y ' ~p~p va ya1r, yyy +w yx.v y ; i ~ ``111 ' i,~`'' - / ! THE CITY$ EIIGNEEIdNG NSPEiS MtAt>11; A P.a. X390, RAtEICi{, NC 27602 A , ~ ~ ~ , . , ~ . ~ ~ OR FAXED TO (91 G) 831-6336.
` ~ } s 01~~ WW ~1V~'1 ~M V1w W~I W / ~ r.u,y .r. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~,I,N s `M w r"" y y I I
~`r - W , , 2~'6~1c; ~ m ~ r~~ ~ ~ I ~ }in .~i
' - ~ w w WW 1A w ~ W wWW ~ ~ ~ ~ YEL ADER o a; t 3~~.a / , fl
W W 1fa W 11a~ 11a ~ ~ \F,11 ww _ , , ~ ~ . - -
_ ~ ~ 4 „ SEv,":R EASE?~tEN7~ SANIi/~Y _ , % r~~
I ~ ~ M+~1 % b '
tF. IN1EAl11 ~ ~ _ i i - /
MICE ti ~ , 1 ~ .iiU It,14 ~ ~ 'f l 1 ,i11t1 i V i
~ / • ~ r ~ ' J ~ ' ~ _ , - i p
I ~ ~ ~I ~ ..r I I-_ - -III-I i ~ ~ ~ti,v _ ~ ,1 ~ dr,
-I (I. _I I I (I L- I ~ I I-- I~I I hI I I I I IrI I I. ~I i I- . ~ ~ ~ _-L' 'L ~'R y tlll'~Ilfl~~ ~ ~~>>i Q
~I ~ I I ~-=-I I ~I I I~ _-I ! 1=) ~ ='I I I. =I I I~I ~ ~ , _ _ ~ 50 BUFF R~ ' c~ I-I ~I I I-I I hI I I III-III^) I h) I I-I ~ I--TI ~ I- h. -
. -i I I-i I Iii ~ ~ ~ 1 ~ / F ~ a ~I~ 111=II1~'lll 11 III ~ i ~y / f
uP euum ~ 1 . ~ - ~ I ~ ` 1 ~ TRIBUTARY 5
r , °o ~ \ , . ' ~ i ~ ' ''R~SFu - - NEUSE RIVER RULE IMPACT SUMMARY
oeTa~ ov ~ s>~eAOER cross s~craN. / ~ ~ i r ~ ~.J b ~ . r l - ! ~ ~ / STREAM IMPACT LENGTH ¦ 125 LF (ALONG CENTERINE)
a / i/ N/F Y GAIL A. TYREIL .a , 0 ~ - ~ ? , ~ E`~" ~ ZONE 1 q~PACT AREA ~ 4 3 SF 0 ~ / ~ ~ ~ 1 ~ i -r ZONE 2 A{PAC1 AREA ~ 3,722 SF
OB 7832 PG 39P Q f ~ ~ r PIN ~79'0970f18 A ~ ~ ' / I ( ~ NOTE: AREAS INCLUDE FILL OPES STONE
~ IOT.~ N . ~ - ~ ~ ~ t -level spreoder is dtepned to diepMSe smolt volumes of concenlrolyd floc scrap ttobN tbpet. _ ? ' ~ ,I / / ~ , / ~ I i ~ ~ i [r
OL_ ST~E~fvl ~ - J ~ _ ~ ,t' ~ %
~ ~ /1, o / I~ i / ~ ~ 7 ~ 7 ~ ~itlllNd/~ r i ` 1 ~
TRIBUTARY 5 ti ~ , ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~~~i ~ r ~ ~ t~" t
a LEVEL SPREADER / ' r ' ryry ' ~i ~ '`1 ~ I r to ~ ~~i 1 JBL.. Q i ~ C~
x 1 I ~ R
~ , ~ i ~
1 ~ / ` ~ r~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ` ~ a
, 5; - ~ _ 50 BUFFER 1 is ~
o _ _ ~ ' ~ , 3691 ~F ~ ~ - ~ , ~o i I ~ ~ ' FR~~ A# }~k I i ~ ~ 1 I".? ~ ~ A. { . ~a4
flood h~ ~ 7 , study 1 / far f: ~ J I.1 t z, Se.~ !t, y ~ ' j ~ ~ ~ R;Pi X7971( Nt)i1,
iri b Beck` Wd~d Ifuuru~ r PHASkI 2 y y , aE , Illllllil lfll / a 1 I f i 4. ~ ~ ~ ` ~ ~ ~
f ~ 1j1NII11IIIINIIIIII111I / ~ 111111?I III IIIIII1~1111 IIII 1111111111111111 11 111111 IIAIIIIIIR~ ~ ~ ~ 1 IIIIII11111 yI
W / I / , ' cr 5TOA611DRA6YAC~EDESIGNTABLE _ _ _ p ~ pEaPa u ~ ? i'
o , c. STONEiU1VEN 6i1BON1610N _ \ i r.. ~ ;
_ a - / D8 76x6 PC .391 , / at 1'1N-W5701~6988 p~ ~T>q1 ti A C c 0(cR) PpE l MI UI DS SLOPE Y I D fegtl Dine -a- AO~E. t ,i I ~
SOT 19R ~ ~ ! 5fJ(~ `3F ~ TO (9IIh)' TOTAL ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ -7 r,, i i ~ UTILITY INSTALLATIONS AND OTHER PUBLIC W
~ Br= E _S r 1.1 21 10 ~ 388.12 0.50 SIT l14 1208 15 0.0115 CB6t CB12 0:11 0.81 0,58 5A N 312 RCP ~ •1 ~ ~ ~ ` FACiLITIE5 4NCLUDING SIDEWALKS AND HANDICAP
....r ~ ~ i I i ~ 10, ~ ~ ' 3 RAMPS AR T E CONSTRUCTS ON ALL STREETS E 0 B D f `
' - sa CB62 0.18 0.82 0.56 BA 110 974:10 36112 388.00 0.58 4.10 1~2 1217 15 0,0115 RCp ~ _ ~ ..J \ ru L ~ ~ I r 11343 SF ~ AS SPECIFIED BY .CITY CODE. THESE !`AgL171Es L ~ ; ~
a _ a C6~4 C~ 0.10 0.~0 0.88 t+Q ?a 37517 310.36.,:' .0.50 6:17 1?4 t0a0 15 0.0115 (3,ASS4 ~ . / - _ ~ , ~ ~ 1615 ;Sr ~ ~ J _ HAVE BEEN APPROVED BY THE CITY OF RA~LEICH - --r , i ~ ' ~ . i_ \ ~ i ,
o , ~ J - ~ ~ ~ AND SHAD. BE 50 INSTALLED UNLESS A CNANC~
~B' 0.81 0.51 x0 5I 372.88 ~ 0.00 , , 7~2 ` 14.56 15 0.0125 RCP j ~ rta ~ , 1 ~ I ~ IS AUTNORi2EQ BY WRITTEN APPROVAL PUBLIC ~ ~
/ _ ~ ~ , \ _ i SANITARY $kWER EASEI~4ENTS ARE TO BE RECORDED ~ x.13 ~ ~
58 361.60 ~ 200'.; :.~pi}~$ TtNN8k1D PRECAST ~ / r j q~ q ~ ~ . 6YO s. .;AM~fd. k LNOF H. 1 l i V I PRIOR TO FINAL ACCEPtANCE. ~ti ~~.3°G~' A ~ i i
:~~r~ ~ 8R?lINAN ~ ~ i SC62 DESN~DBYOTt~tS ~ 100 l110~RS 5x17 Pf~CAST N/i / 4 1~.'"; ~ - ~ 8305 PG 1527 r EflwARD a & ,IOrcE ~ SIGNATUR :
,r PfN 0797088729 ~ / UMGEMACM 40T 1032 OB 7455 PG 135: ~ \ i o ~ -R
'4 . ('f / ~ PIN 0797089728 ~ G HNC M~~ ' LOT 1031 N ' , 4 Y N>~ I I ~ \ ` CHIEF EN~iNECR~ ,
{ /K ~ / ~ KENNEiM,9 t b e ~ ,e , 180 ~ ,kl<w`ON KENt~M,,99 bC~TERESk A t~ l ~ I 1 ~ ~ -
,k~M50N JR. ~ j I ~ ~ ~ A
DB ~ r. ~`PNi 7tF DB 70A1 PG 190 " ' / DIR. Or PUKIC UTILIT ES
LOT !0; /'PIN 71$0720 R & BETS } GREENE JR. \ N 19T 1050 DB 6507 PC 27 PLEASANT GR UN}TED
Pi 079 7161 7 1 M1•tTH0DS1 RCH \ c0; 029 \ D 8130 PG 1264 \ TRAFFIC ENGtNEER_.
IN ell, \ P! 0797182700 { OT 1028
t.ia,Ch AO I i CONSERVA11ON ENGINEER . ~
t~ A
SHEET I OF 13
.
y , r .

_ _ a _ • ,
GENERAL CONSTRUCnON NOTES: ~
_ _ ~ ~ l ~ ~ ~ ,I ~ ~ 1 1 , , - / ~I~~1SI, 3 ~ I 1. ALL C(N~IISTRUCTWN SHALL CONFORM TO fiH T TY OF R E CURREN CI ALEIGH
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ _ ~ ~ ~ ; I r ~ ,fill I; \ STANDARD DETAILS AND SPECIFlCAnONS. ~
r l ~ ~ ~ ~ i i~ I j ' t ~ t t; f~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ \ ,V 2. ALL GUTTER SHOWN WITHIN RIGHT OF WAY SHALL BE STANDARD 30" v CURB AND GUTTER. 'N
- ~ ~ I ~ ~ ~ ~ 1 ~ ~ CHARLEa 3~ NEFAA'N T. ~ ~ ~ I I ~ ~ 1 i . 3. A COMPLETE COORDINATE LISTING AND AU 14 DRAWWG FILE ~ TOCAD RELEASE
1111 11~1,///~ Plte „5„~6`6:. W ARE AVAILABLE' UPON REQUEST FROM Ti`gS FIRM. CI 4. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL LOCATE ALL UnLITIES PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF 4 I
~ \ - i ~ lf. 4; ~ ~ ~ ~ 1.1 ~ I ~ _ r-- V' GRADING ACnVInES. CONTACT ULOCO AT t-@OD-632-4949 FOR FIELD ~
/ ~ lil ~ A ~ ~ j ~ i I ' - alll ' ; 1 ? - ?lluulgl` oonsrRUCnaI uNrs ~ ~ ~ 1 I 'rIr LOCAnON OF UNDERGRWND UnLlnES. I. 5. ALL DIMENSIONS SHOWN ARE TO BACK OF CURB, UNLESS OTHERWISE STATED ~ a
r ~l ~ nrp ~ ~ - - iufrr ON PLANS. - ~ fA
. ~ , _ - F 6. ALL PAVEMENT ON SITE SHALL ~ 2" 1-2 AND B" ABC STONE. ~ 7. UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED ALL PROPOSED SPOT ELEYAnONS ARE TOP OF ""I
I ~l. ,•r 1 1 - - I ~ ~ < < , ~ U,~ ~ ~ ~ 1111 _ _ , W \ ASPHAIt OR Flr!BSHED SINtFACE. Ei
~ ,~+C `Ulfr ~ r, , it • M~, I I 1 All/~~ TN6M1 ~ ~L~Y ~ . 8. AREAS DISTURBED Y SEED ALL B CONSTRUCnON, AND NOT INDICATED t0 BE PAVED OR PLANT®, UPON COMPLEnON OF GRA091G ACnVInES. USE REBEL. 3
FESCUE IN ACCORDANCE WITH SEEDING ON All SCFIEDIILE DET SHEETS. -J
~ - ~ r G,~ _ - C?A ~a ~9 G 83S ~ ~ ~ 1~ ~ , ~ t . ~ ~ ~ ( P~~N 07.7190636 9. WATER MAINS SHALL HAVE A MINMIII~I 4' OF COVER. i
I , I / ~ _ ~ ~ I ~ I a.c; q~ " ~ / / ~ J /1 10. THE TOPOGRAPHY SHOWN WAS FIELD LOCATED 8Y OTHERS. a tt. THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR MISURMIG POSInVE DRAINAGE TO ALL STORM 4l
• ~ ~ i i ~ y7~ „ ~ ~Q~ ~ ; • ~ .r . ^f ~ " ~ i ~ P ~ ly , - ~~111111111111111 llgl.- _ <a STRUCTURES. w I q
~ ~ ~ IIHI111 f ~ blrl pH ~ _ , 12. ALL SANITARY SEWER SLOPES AND PIPE LENGTHS ARE COMPUTED FROM CENTER
~ . !ll ~+nll ~ Jry~! m ~ . - / s . Tn+IN 10 (w) s'(H r !1!!// ~ 4 s s,• ~ ! ESIGNED BY OTHERS t! ~ . ~ ~ - i . , AN M a OF M HOLE TO CENTER OF ANHOLE.
~ ie^. ' ' ~ ~ ~ ~ ~,ex clsll ~ ~ q llyry ~ ~i t ~31.9~~ ~ ' ~ S INV. 36 BY OTHERS t3. CONSTRUCT ALL SANITARY SEWER MANHOLES FLUSH TO FlNAL PAVEMENT gtADE i OR AS SHOWN IN NON-PAVED AREAS. INCLUDE COST 91 BASE BID.
• \ ~ 1' ~ j _ i 1!11111!// ~ 4 / r I/p 4,, ~ ~ S INV. 3.5 ~ ~ ~ I = , V _ / _ o ~ b95'EL 371. X3.5 14. CONSTRUCT ALL FIRE HYDRANTS WITH BASE PUNtIE SlX INCHES ABOVE FINAL
I ~ It~11NIkE ! - GRADE. INCLUDE COST IN BASE 81D.
~ ~ ~7 va ~ I ~ ~ ///fl/ y , _ , 15. CONTRACTOR SHALL CLEAR AND GRUB ENnRE R WITH91 10D' OF All INTERSECnONS. . ,
lr ; . i ' "`r ` Lt~1 ~ ' ~ ~ ~ : _ ~ , it - f - ~ . - ~ lv / Q'~~~^ ^r / I ST();~ f~ l f 18. DEVELOPER IS RESPON~BIE FOR THE INSPECnON OF THE CONSTRUCnON OF ALL ~ - PRIVATE STREETS. COPIES of CERTIFlED iNSPECnON REPORTS MUST BE sUBMiTTED Tb
/ i ~nmrmnnl t ~ r THE gTYS ENgNEERING INSPECnONS MANAGER AT P.O. BOX 590, RALEIGH, NC 27602
r r ~ ~ ; j OR ( 9) 63 M FAXED TO 9i 1-6339.
i ~ ~ ~ ~ . ~ ~ y TEMP Y ~ ~ CE _ ' - ~ lllilllli - v NIIIIIIIIHIiIII~#j
-r ~ / , ~ ~ _ 7. ~ J, ~ 1111{ 1 ~ un ~ ' 1 {1', , Inuulullu t.;,. ¢ ~ / ,nu 11lfllllli} ' ~ ~i Y ~NIINIIIII ~ +t
° r w. ~ \ ~~-117,`}%. ~ - ~ / \ - 1 \ ~ ~ t „ ' - ~~IIIJt ` ` ' Ilpf i / ~ , _ A c ,EkA, ~ ~ iti ~ ~ [ ~
, ~t ~l ~ ~ ~ • ` i 1 D~3 45~tl PG X84
• - ~ ~ , ~ ' i ' ~ r C ~ ~ a ~ t _ nl U I
_ 1J j~ d~ ~ Ins II , ~ \ / ~S1 .-~t ~ ,III / / I I 1 Il nl I ~ ~ / - CONSTRUCTION SEQUENCE . ~ , _ _ ti ~ ~ `1~te }
- v...~ ~ ~ ~ / 1~~ Ilil _ ++Jb~\ ~ r ~ , S III ` / ~ ~ FE , - _ r,, ~ ~ r ~ ~ ID ~ r~ t. OBTAIN A GRAaNG PERMIT FROM THE qTY OF RALEIGH INSPECTIONS ~ ~
S _ ; ~ ~ _ - ~ _ - DEPARTMENT.
t ~ a _ _ 2. INSTALL GRAVEL CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCES, SILT FENCE, TREE PROTECTION ~ . / ~
~ ~C. ~ ~ ~fi ~ fi,~ i F , FENCE ANO SEDIMENT BASINS PER THE APPROVED SITE SEGMENTATION ANO t _ ; TR PLAN. AR A I Y. ° EROSION CON OL CLE S NECESSARY TO NSTAL`. THE DEVICES AIL
_ i ~ ~o
~ ~ I ~ ~ ~ , - ~ 6,.~,,,, , 1v y ~~AA ////~/j~~~ r tix j r , s?. ~,r.~ 3. CALL 890-3453 FOR ON SITE INSPECTION BY THE CITY OF RAt;EIGH ERO~ON - ^ CONTROL INSPECTOR FOR APPROVAL PRIOR TO ANY LAND DISNRBING ACTIVITY.
' jN ti111 ~ 7~,, ~''~-T~ , ~ a ~ ~3~~F ..~1,1•~ . • • 4. CLEAR AND GRUB, GRADE, INSTALL SITE IMPROY~IIENT~ PER Tiff APPROVED j, ~ . PLANS. MAINTAIN ALL S&E MEASURES AS REQiARED TO ENSURE THEIR OPER
. ~ , ~ ,18~.. O _ ; - ~ ~ ~ PR
~ I (1111{. - ~ ~ ~,,vnuul+~ ~ ~ w Q d~' tll~" 4 I,v~ t` % C~N5 - ~ ~ w. , a ~ ~ , 1 N111H • • ~ ; ~ OPERATION. ADJUST LOCATION AND HEIGHT OF TEMPORARY DIV£RSfON GTCHES MN ~s _ .
c~wl / . . • A5 NEEDED TO ENSURE THAT SEGMENT RUNOFF IS OR2ECTED T4 SEGMENT BASINS. .
o ~ o ! ~ ~ ~ `P I ~s / r ~ z• 5. GRADED SLOPES ANO FlLLS ARE TO BE PLANTED OR PROVTO~.p WITH • IIf 111111111 - _
~o ~ ~ ~ = V , ~,.,y Ilul~" 'y ~ PR4 CTiVE SUFFlCIENT TO AYS . _ TE COVER RESTRAIN EROSION WITH! T5 WORKMG 0 • - AFTER COMPLETION OF ANY PHASE OF GRADtI~. ALT. AREAS UPON WHICH NO
_ ~ ~ ~ , o ~ m ~ ~ ' tl~' ~ ~ ` , ~ r / _ f- , , ~ FURTHER LAND aS1URBING AC11VIlY WILL BE UNDERTAKEN ARE 1'0 BE PLANTED .J _
~ OR PROVIDED WITH PROTECTIVE COVER WITHIN 30.WORKING PAYS. THIS INCLUDES ~ ~ "
,r 1 ~ _ THE AREAS WHERE BUILaNGS ARE Tb 8E LOCATED AND NOT BUILT ON WITHIN THE . ~ WORKING DAYS. USE THE SEED BED- PREPARATION ,AND SEEaNG SCHEDULE
\;1 ti ~ ~ t „ j n- ~t r ~ ~ i ~ ,,c \ ~ FOR SLOPE STABILIZATION Ir~ASURES (DETAIL SF~T 11 ,
.i• 6. AS CONSTRUCTION PROGRESSES SJSTALL P~IANENT EROSION CONTROL
R(.r;lyk I- J~ ~ ~ ~ r. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ _r ~ ~ BfiC3 I'I I o1 ~ MEASURE CH AS EROSION CON ~ - S SU TROL BLAF#(E15, RIP RAP APRONS, DETENTION
v 1 j I t i~ - ~ ~ - j ~'l `f' i M ~ PONDS, VELOCITY aSSIPATORS, CHANNEL LINERS AND GRAVEL BASE COURSE, ETC. _ _ . 7. WHEN CONSTRUCTION IS COMPLETE AND ALL AREAS ARE STA9NlZE.D CALL FOR
.SEDIMENT BARN SCHEDUIE ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ - I~ . ~ F - 1, .j ~ % ~ - - = f ; ~ 'I' ON-SITE INSPECTION BY THE SEGMENTATK?N CONTROL Nr>SPEC
t:~ ~ ~ ~ OIM N 2 - I ~ _ c~ w . 8. IF SITE IS APPROVED, REMOVE 11~IPORARY DIVERSION DITCHES, SILT FENCE
= I ac. N ~;7 IYER ON DITCH 1 t ~ ~ ' , ~ SC# 12'(w) x b'[rt) ~ • ~ : - SEDIMENT BASINS, ETC. ANO INSTALL REMAINING STORM PIPE, ORIFlCES, FURED
pt OR NA ac. 0.5 ?it1111111~ + ' sl ED Y OTHERS - END SECTIONS ANO RIP RAP GSSIPATOR PADS THEM SEED, PAYE OR RIP-RAP 1~ f IV / ~tlS, N .365 3 RESUURVG aSTURBED AREAS. W
REQU I] 1100 ff x D~ ? 40 9 , c:, , _ ! HIttN1Ut1-•,,. ~+r`` ~ } / C'~ 111. a+ ~ , p?/ / DS DV+l. 3650 rG . , ~ 9. WHEN VEGETATION IS ESTABLISHED CALL FOR FNAL SITE INSPECTION. , ~
x 4 2 x - ' ~ N~~ , ~'y~/ ,
X 2 x 1 ~ 100 Flood fnn e ~ ~ ~ per flood study 9 t f~,,~ TEM Y 511. CE ,
~ 966 ~ ,r try Becky Word, PE u. A ~ ~ . ~ Ilflll ~ ~ _ .t J~ n I
5 MIN. 5 MIN. ~ , 1 ~ r,,..~
WEIR LENGTH 10 M 10 MIN , ~ ` !G IF l Vi U~ r' V1 •4~ ~
C10 0.5 x ORA~1 AREA x 7.22 4 CFS 4 C1`S • • , j 7 • 7 ~ ~ 'T J6 ~(ri T~' -
i ~ - , ~ - ~a ~ ~ ;i USE AFD IiA~ RAP FlL1ER BAS1ti OTL 4.03 lF1T•9 r - I ~ - ~ - r~y - Ilillll / olm 9718+'1: F~ / ~ 1111 ~ W . f/ , ~ _ ~IIIIIIIlNIAII INII III ~ ' r+,
PyyLA~C~~E ~y¦~~~y~~~y~OI1CH PFD! D1MML ~y,00 si _ ~1
I'1rYG ~~1Y/~M• PER 4.V1 .7n1 ~ ~ - ~ o,~:' I ~ N cfn '~43~! ~~A'V~ ~ S~lky - -a- - _ ? , PLACE IN1~ Gn ~RMYC+ ('Gq ~T~ ~.Q/ SHT 9 ~ ,~f{ ~r _ ',~,~r r' if5'-;`-_~Ir p.;j ~ 1N1111 mi/~l,/ i
111 i i . ~l1 ~ N _ NNHNIINyNllll _ -
11N1 1 1111~u,~~~~~ l II II IIIdINWIIIU ~ ~ ` • , = k~(1 1
~1 it .""'mNffl a !!1 lllfll ~ j ~ 0,. -11~„I,nl: ~ 3 _ - ~~,tinl - % /
tlhltl N1b1111 ~ ` P ~ f ~~1?ylyl - - - ~ v V
SYR~G~ i` IIIU! Ii ~ 50 STONE t IlllJ1 pK 1 ~ y; nu~lllul , 111111 ~~,1~~ ~ ~ p i .,,J _
i{pl •~'~0 ~ IlI ~ 50 BUFF R/ 11111 coR u1 ~ I V: ~ I ! ~
/ / ~ E 1N~ S 1 x ~ ~ ' 2 p(pi !J E ~ ~~C~ 9 S~ ~ •
~ ~N1 i 's --j , 'I -
O x 4 • . ~ o ~ f ~ G - - , ul,
i ~ o ~ ~ , ~ - ~ i / _ ~ % ~ ~ E~ i ~
PER N'IDOT DISS~ATOR CHART ~ ~,i ti i~ o ~ ~ R,bS ESQ ~ ~
RIP RAP OISSAPATOR PAD ~ ~~t14Elt a ~ ~ D3 ?SSA. PC J9B ~ \ ~ O _ ~ ( b ' _ _ , - . ' b ' - -
~ / h ~ _ ~ ~ ~ o~ ~{„z _ _ ~ ~ , . FS ~ ~ ; , j ,
~ ~ r ~ ~ ii lOP~011 lTOCK P1[ NOIES • CL-STREAM ~ . - ~ ~ r ~ ~ ,
i i i. 11M1L Mi E10~5S Tdga or? !r~ ~ ~ _ , / u~ts rti' ~ ~ ~ ; / / r ~ o' ~ l l ~ ~ ~ ~ r
'J - 1~ , ' y ~ ~ ~ ~ ,
` I i f ~ w ; 7 ~ / ~ ~ - ~ w
• / i o ~ U 4 y I ~el~' ~ ~ ~ Q~ ' ~ ~ unuTY INSTAUATUUINS AND oT?~R Pu~c ~ !
1~ ~ LL ~ . , ~ , t FACIUnES, ~ICI.UOING S~EWAIKS AND HANDICAP I
x ~Y III 11111(± I . 1111Ud11111111111i III I~~` ' RAMPS ARE TO BE CONSTRUCTED QN ALL STREETS 11111111 IIIIIII~HIII VIII AS SPECIF~D BY CITY CODE, THESE FACILITIES 1~1
cn ~ ~IIIII I , w / I HAYE BEEN APPROVED BY 1Hf CITY OF RALEIGH
TOTAL DENUDED AREA 5o BUFFER ' Q - ~ . _ AND SHALL BE SO INSTALLED UNLESS A CHANGE L•I th ,iAf.~ ~ ~ 'BREN~~A i)
_ i '~6_~ ~F 2.3 ACRES l; F_R, R ~ IS AUTNQRIZED BY WRITTEN APPROVAL PUBLIC o~ 3~ze ~c ~ ~ SIIWTARY SEWER EASEIAE~ITS ARE TO 8E RECORDED
° P:~RKL~'~' ..~Of)1)S ' ~ flood r~~~~e - r. , ~ ~ ~ p f9od stud}` _.i r ~ 3 ~ ~ . i b Beck NIdrO P,E Illlluul / ,,,v a~s~'e~e PRIOR TD FINAL ACCEPTAN(iE. r LQ( 410 ~ ,r
P~It~SE ~ v v ,IIIIIIII,I,~I,II O III III IIIIHill II1111111 ; SIGNATURE: M
IIII I I II -H II { 1111111111 Illlllllllt~ ~ ; ~ IIIII 111 1 11 II III j III ~ - T•~ ~ t ~ ~ ~ ~ , ' ' ~`+r
_ _ _ ~ ~ - ?~1 YfIIG~f ~~7TGif4- ~ ~Y
VI t i \ ~ ' ~qi Pf~8"~ ~ ~ 1 'Pi 1 \ ~ i \ ~ _ ~ ~~~RRR
~ ~rtt ~3~~ "57~~3 , , ! ; O _L SOIL & EROSION CONTROL LEGEND - - - ~ ~ , a DIR. OF PUBtJC UnuTIEs r -
i , ~ I. f7. i ' Q ~I_r 3/',.I , r ~ ~ , ? ~ TRAFFlC ENgN~ r~~ F"'I
~ TEi~ORARY SST fQICE ? ? ? DIVERSION dTCH ~ \ \ Try + :'e ~ !mot
H- ~ ~ , (10'1 , _ ~ , z ~ ~ ~ CONSERVAnON ENGINEER , y/ C~
~ Pao~cnol+ ~ _ , ~ ; ; ~ 3 ~ 5~~ , ,1 ~ a ~ awwa ~ RIP RAP ~ lpr ~f
16 i ~ 1Sr - IIIIIIIiI1111111H11i1111111 ~ LA/15 - ~ 15 l ~ ~~r ~ ~ ~ ~ rrm ~ ! , FIM
m ~ j / -j,
~ , ; OON51RUC110N DITRANCE ST TOM 8A~1 ARD o A1gMp CA /Y l~
IFLETpNOTfC110N •;,r ~ ~ ~ ~~~.13• ~o .~r, ~ i ~ Q
n v~~ ~ , ~ ~ ~,7 'i ~ ~~I~ ~ ~v • 6L 0
~ , ~ ,;,1,~ . ~;u~c~ • ~ ~ ~ I ice,
c ~ - ~ o SEE DETAILS d1 9EFT 11 - 855 i 0 ~O r T1~ ~ ~ ~ ~
~~yl"?3'29 1' iGJt N/F t i i 1 I i ~ % 1 r' J ~ J\
> ~EV~~iEM,A ~ kRS;L Q ,l:~Vr i~r"' dR I ~ , . ! -
= GRAPHIC SCALE ~ r I 'r ~ es6aH ~ 8~-~'u _ ~ ~ , - ~f ~
~d J to OB e' t~SA PIS 0 4' ris 7I: Mr n r w j
vv f PIS C 17,"4 / fl' i.U3 1'024 t 9 c, tC tj „PrQ
I l-ur 134-
IN Fm
n 1 inch 40 !t. ! a Y
D m
i SHEET 5 OF 1311
O

_ _ _ _
4'-3" - 5'-3" ~acr~e
S FT ~ rAx _ . . _ _ . _ _ L__
I' vARABU AS aitECTID {Y 11E EiIBIELR 12 ~ ,
- - 1.5 FT , --_.__`__..________e__ _ _____.._-_3
1800 CU FT/ACRE I 1 ;III ~ 5 FT , ;4 ~l MAX - SIDE ELE:~vAT10N 0. ~~z-2 G,t. PIDE IyUTES. '1:::.
M1.d.~T~ ~ , ( .xr°, I YN 17-1/7 GA. __v.___.__. t- THE SLOPE or T?+E ounEit Ta p! ~ -r- TO TNT C+~TC~IBASN aN THE UDlip.l
.1 MN. TO cA ~ I e , it wRES ~ lAE wRF1 j 1. USE FOR DRAINAGE AREAS ,x ~ . _ ` -7_ SIDE sIW,L BE61hi tO' IRON THE " CATCHBASiN. THE SIOPE Of THE GUTTER
( •x NOT EXCEEDUVG S {FIVE) ACRES. T• TER " ro 1 TREAD SURFACE To THE CA>CH~1+ os THI DOwNtNi.L " s:~ SgfE, SMIAtI 8EGB1 5' CROM T?iE CATCH
2. EARTH BERM SHALL BE STABILIZED w/ SEEDING RO S TI 'FABRIC , i , ~ - ACCORDiNG TO TOWN SPEC~ICATIOFIS. 1 y l' j - 2- CASs iLY#IOLE sTEPS 5WY.L BE Q
u _ i , OVERFiLl6" A I NSYAt1EO L CATCHBASIHS OVER T ~ " i '3/4 HOLES FOR HANDLES A _ _ S _ ~ >w DEPTH. DEPrH SFUL1. BE 1AEASURED.
~Sa~+ FOR Sf rnEMENT I'I III sETTLED i5" ~ TRdM THE TOP Gf GUTTER ifl THE ~ ~ NIVERT aF THE C~TCN&?Ti'xl.
~ N EE DETAIL S i • 3- DEP1H 1N i P ~I -f -?I IdEASINtEB FRAM E 0 OF BRICK i t2' 15' wOR1( TO HWEKi OF EfiL1.ENT UNE. ~ 0?
l '!i . ~;11~~c 1" ~ - _ I ~ -
1,5 FT ~y.~ {,t, 4 FT MIN p^ #F.' FR~NT VfEW ! I : Q1 I T_ d _ _
~ X2:1 SIDE tr " ~ sLOPf MaX _ , , n , ~ ~
5FT ~ - , MAX FlLL , sIE¢. PDSE DESIGN QF SR)jLj~AYS ~ ~,'r,'- _ _ _ _ __1._ , _ 2, t 2» p ~ i SAN OF COVER B 1 D / ~
t FILTER ' 1:1 SSE SLOPE ail, xmAN woPE FdBUL I ii I 6" SCALE 1 1 2" = 1' 6" ~ 1 '
DRAINAGE AREA WEIR LENGTH FABRIC ~ T" MAX NATURAL sl.r FBKE (AMBC (ACRES} (fT) GROUND
° Flu SIOPt 2 6.0 MIN i „~I ~ 1 < .G_'.. T
• T'~ PEiAlll a SM•T 3 8.0 >a 1 ,LASS 'e' CONC.
4 t0A ' ~ raa FARUES, UBE w_ _ NM SF NaNIED STONE. 5 12.0 -USE 9aT FDICE par MIfJ1 dIAAYAGE AREA ~ 2'-i 2'-7" 1'-10 1/2 2 -4_1/2°_ _ ~ ~-•~-ts'-~ 1 - 1 o
t MAINT NANCE Dacs NOT ExCEED TI4 urE AID IEVaI w ~ aRAOE " ~ ~st<T DRrtENS10NS SHOWN ARE MINIMUM AIxAS aF CpICdtRAIED FlOo GTCN BA4N. 4'--3" 5'-3° ~ ~ 3 NO 3 REBNtS 8 LONG ~ r~ ` 6,~ 8' ~ 2 t/Z' '7f
INSPECT TEIOORARY SEDNENT TRAPS AfIFA EACH PERIOD Oi SU7IFTCANT RMIfAII Rt]NNE YQIENT AID tESTORE TRM Tp tt5 OT9allhl ONENgKk15 wEN 1NE SEDIMENT 11A5 AOCUMUTAIED TO OIIE-IWF THE DESIGN DEPTH O( TIE TRAP. PIAGf 11E iED4MENT TIMT IS REYOYEU MT b 7~ COwR I ~,Ii~JPJ A-A ~ --a 9' I-~ S E. ~ .
A DE9QUTE0 aSPOSAI AREA Alq 11[P1ACt TNC CONTAMNATED PART Cf AE GRA1fl. (ACPK., ~ O~fR SKR1 REVISIONS _ a a t t ~ c - - - _ ,
REV~IONS pECN TIE STRUCRAIE FOR DAA4AOE FRpI 171OSION OR PpIMG. PERNIDICALLY PECK nE OEPTN d: iNE SPII.WAY t0 ETrl1E IT IS A MNU.A}Y ATE SCRIPRQN I ANabR SKMtT AS Of 1.5 FT BllOw AIE l.Ow POINT Of TIE OR1AIrUAENT: NMIFDIATEI.Y Fat /NY SETilfAENT Of iNF EMBANtJ1ENT TO 510111r ABOVE DESN;w gREC1ED BY ENGN6A ~ DA D CR TiON pupE. AXY RP RAF asFO TROM nE suwAY IRAST ~ REPUGED AREaATEEr. to/ee NOTE ADBIRpI Ss.s. 3" 1 2 T-- 4~-- 2 1 4
4 WAY STAB&AtE iFr~ T AND ALA. 061UR~C0 AREA$ ABOK THE SE(M,ENT Pa7L AMD DOMNSIREAY TROY TFE TRAP I1~ARLV AFTER tD MErr IK)lE S.wEw -°-""t--° and ADO NOTE G.M.A. f~li51RUCTION MTN SeE0R10. I/b3 i£ AaTItR>H GMA ~I -----t-- ~ - - - ~ t " -1 - _ ~ --t--_._.p " - - 6" 1 1 / " 5,. ~ 7 1 2" ~ 1 1 /4" z" c.t; vtPE 2z' ioNC -
SHEET 1 i>F 2 4 RE1A6E fFJiCE FABRC CtAA , i 4~ ~ t s s.__ 1 i 4" 5 4 1I / ?N s SLOPE -te ~LOw T?P Or C.B. ,_L _Z"
STD. No. ST_D. No. ~ 15" _ ~a _ _ r.. STANDARD C.B. S~E:P
~ SECTION GRAVEL & RIP RAP FILTER BASIN STANDARD 1 E_M{ ORARY SILT FENCE 4.U3 4,01 i SECTION Q - H - ~ - r
SCALE 1 SCALE 1 1 2" = 1' S" a' - - r-a'wtN. - ' e" /
q OsTS N I 0y~ ~f~ eur~ trn.
S• EMM BpM 70' MIN. ~ ~ 1/2 ROUND TOP Gii_IN F` -
4~H, ~ 21 2" r /
i BUT SUFFtgENT TO KEEP t. PUT SILT FENCE OR TREE PROTECTION FENCE UP YA'C T T SEDIMENT ON SITE TO ENSURE CONSTRUCnON ENTRANCE IS USED. i a 3/g r
' \ ~ ~ i'' J i If TRU T I A THAT P~~~ 2 CONS GTiON ON HE S TES RE SUCF1 L!11 ~f , , _ _ y /J ~ _ iaq L!11 i 20
v(' ~ ~ ' • THE MW IS NOT REMOVED 8Y THE VFJiC1E TRAVEL- 1 1 ,2 12 1 2 1 1 /4 1 pq _ _ _ _ cuss 'a' -
- i'`~y I / J T,~ 2"-3" STONE TO ~ USED " 25. OR WIDTH OF RJG OVER THE STONE, THEN THE TIRES OF THE VEFUCLES MUST BE WASHED BEFORE ENTERMG THE / I EXISTiNG (SURGE STONE OR RAILROAD PROPOSED STREET, ` ~ PUBLIC ROAD. Z .
~ ROADWAY BALLAST . ) r WHICHEVER IS Y % ~ ~ GREATER, 3, IF A PROJECT CONTINUES TO PULL MUD ANO DEBRIS ~ _..__l ~
\ ' ON TO THE PUBLIC ROAD. THE TOWN MIL CLEAN THE DEl ~ DEVIL. OF HANDLE
\ ExINA PosT w Mtoae AREA AND INVOICE THE FINANCIALLY RESPONSIBLE 'HOD wRE ATTAp1Ep ~ OPETwG I ~ PERSON AS INDICATED OPi THE FINANCIAL RESPONS- _w_: SCALE 3"~1' • I STN~II>~ 8 011, C~1CH ESN!
To POSTS wTN LENGTHS IBRJTY FORM. a EARS \ NoRrzoNru METU Posy stalENr PIT 1 1 2"
~ MIRED SEpNtELr TO YERncu l ~ / -a. rows , ~
T T N - T ~ PLAN _ - 3/a
\ / ~ I ~ 2 1/4"
i I ~ 2t 1/4" " 3/A" `.F._____..-_-- _ SEEDBED PREPARATION
aaaS' < FABRIC fpDFD 3~4"- " FABRIC CUT AND FD~o I 3/4 -I - ~ SIDE ELEVATION
I. DPo1f STEEL FENCE POSE AT LEAST t!' WTO ~ DYER iFE IIOItl70NTAL 04ER NORRONTAL saD Gaa~tD PETKE POST PAST 35' MIN. 15~ MR+i. NfW CONSTRUCnON ~ "T 2" 1. Chisel compacted areas and spread topsoil 3 inches deep over adverse soil 9 3/4 conditions, if ava1able.
~ ,IpDp ~ ~ A~PTA81E EXISTING ROADWAY ~ ~ 2. Rip entire area to 6 inches de th.
l_ P ROPE Ti VI W NorMZC«ru Posr J. ~ l ~ t' APART TO AtTACN FABRIC S ~ ~ FENCE AND fA~tIO I - I r p 3. Remove atl Dose ock, roots, and other obstructions leaving surface
. ` BIBBED RI TREMpI • ~ , ~ 12• MIN. 4 ~-~-,._..--roP CF BAfFtE sHwtO 8E 6' 6 MIN. ~ ~ L.- w - i __~-y J reasonably smooth ?nd uniform. L~ - .
.I ( -.---r~ ly ' - TIETNE SPNL,wAY BE 80TTW OF - 5 \ I ~ A ~ I 5" _ - - 5" 4. Apply agricultural lime, fertilizer, and superphosphate uniformly and mix "I with soil see below' ~ ~ ~ ~
soTTar a x e•,e• T~a+, ~ ` ti , ~ END E~EVATIQN 5. Continue tillage until ? wdl-pulverized, firm, reasonably uniform seedbed
Fluf.O wA+~s ~ p ABR1C UNDER STONE CO?PACTED is prepared 4 to 6 inches deep. STANDARQ CJITCH BASIN CASTINGS 6. Seed on a freshi re aced seemed and cover seed li tf with seedin
REw~oas / REw s Yp p ~Y 9 equipment or cultipock offer seeding.
DaTE DESGRIPnoN SECTION AT OPENING ATE DESGR,PnoN CROSS SECTION A/SI IE-CREATEp DETAE GY.A t 10 STONE TTPE YHA. r 7. Mulch immediately affe seeding and anchor mulch.
BAFFLE INSTALLAliON - STET ~ ~ ADD NDTES GALA sIEET 2 a< 2 ? LEN ( cAIA 8 Inspect all seeded areas an4 make necessary repairs or reseedings within the plantin season, if possible. If stand should be over Fi4% Boma ed,
STD. No. STD. No. 9 9 A reestablish following origino{ lime, fertilizer and seeding rates,
9. Consult Conservotior~, Inspector on maintenance treatment and fertilization
AV RIP P FILTER BASIN CON ~TRU~.;11~,_~N ENTRANCE GR EL & RA ao~ 4.03 after permanent cover is est~lished. W
Apply. Agricultural limestone 2 tons/acre (3 tons/acre in day soils) ~
Fertilizer - 1,p00 IDs./acre - i(1-10-18 r~~/~ V,t
2• ~ r~' Superphosphate -500 lbs./acre 20X analysis
Mulch - 2 tons/oae -small rain straw 9 Anchor -Asphalt Emulsion ~ 340 gals/acre
t~-..
STEEP CUT OR F1LL SLOPE r
1:1 SLOPE {MAX) SEES?ING SCHEDULE
- sTAeu7E Bna151cN arch MRRwG Apb N ~ iMOI d O~F,'LAAt11MRlof WIEIRN wRl TEMPORARY SEEDNIG IETIERS APE TO 8E 5 Nql rt, ptAllY IFOBIE AIO 9'AfFD AS Shoulders, Side Ditches Slopes (ax 3 1)
CROSS SECTION Mrn saw+ ABOMt rR sa sa a td DATE TYP,~ PLANTING RATE
%ACE 9pl AT EafN EM ~ UIfAR 1R[E RIDEfTIDIi ' AMAS, At0 AT 71TERM15 ROi TO OEEED ~ D.C N BE'EIF[Il Aug 15-Nov 1 Tall Fescu? 120 tbs./acre
FOR TREE PADECRpt AliAS LESS WN 70G N RE~EER. PipY[f NO IfSS THAN pl SR11 PER PRDTEC11Q1 iAEA ATTACH Sip6 9:DRlY Nov 1-Mar 1 Tall Fescue 120 lbs./acre
~ fEllfE PDSIS AR9 FABMC. & Abruzzi Rye 25 lbs./acre Mar 1-Apr 15 Tall Fescue i24 lbs./acre
5-tl' Ot CRANp, Ur fE9STARi ~ Apr 15-Jun 34 Hulled Common Bermuda Grass 12 lbs./?cre
~ UPSLOPE TOE POSITIVE GRADE 1.09L MAX. z Par B~ARattAOE fAEpt Jul 1-Aug 15 Toll Fescue and 60 lbs./acre
T Browntop Millet 35 lbs./acre
. _ _ _ _ . L... N. ••'or Sorgum-Sudan Hybirds 30 lbs./acre
SIDE SLOPES - - - - - - - - - I TRIE PNOiECT10lI JI~A ~ sal As 2 : 1 MAx. ~ ( ) _ DO NOT ENTER
Slp~es (3.1 to 2~
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ MN
a_~ ~ - 1 ri Mar 1 June Se cea Lespedeza (scarified) 50 lbs./acre
GRADE STEEP CUT OR Flll SLOPE (Mar 1-A 15) Add Tall fescue 60 lbs. acre Pr / H
REVISIONS ~ . (Mar 1-Jun 30) Or Ad Weeping Love rass 5 lbs./acre 9 M~
A IPn N (Mar 1-Jun 30) Add Hulled Common
t/93 NOTE ADgTgN G.M.A. Y g P AL N VIEW D Bermudagrass 8 Ibs,/acre ~j Tall Fescue an 60 lbs./acre Q
8rowntop Millet 35 lbs./acre
STD. No. a a N IT N H Qr Sorghum-Sudan Nybirds 30 lbs./acre
DIVERSIO D C W 4.09 P051S NAY BE aA PRE, t aA OAK ~ 07 1.33 R1f sT~. Sap 1-Mar 1 Serica Lespedeza M
W NSTNl lf2'I PR4&Cfl011 FDkf A10 5191AG; PRgR TO CAt111G fpl MRtI pl-9[ (unhulled-unscarified) 741bs./acre
~ MSPECBp18Y 11# Nlwl Of CART IpN~ MISPECTOk E1J WRTUN IfsfE PR6IECROR FDKE ONpAyIaIT D{t/tRdl OF PRQECT. And Tall Fescue 50 lbs./acre p,.~ (Nov 1- Mar 1) 9~ Abruzzi Rye 25 lbs./acre
ADa110NU 9GN5 YAY BE REOIMRD BY piY OF AAfB61 N~ECIEMS PEPAplflll z RA4D ON ACR1N FE1D i;0,'g11aK
W Y n' W Consult Conservation E grneer or $o~l Conservation Service for odditionoi
F-i Q STANDARD METAL POSTS 2'-a• w GROUND TREE PROTECTION FENCE DETAILS N.T.S. information concerning other alternatives for vegetation of denuded areas. - The above vegetation rates ore those which do well under local conditions;
CU other seeding rate combinations are possible. For o lawn quality turf, ?t
O ~ - GALVINIZED *e ~ N " double or triple rotes. ~w ,
HARDWARD WIRE 0 ' ~ ~ ~ ~ ""•,~Jy~Rororv -Reseed according to optimum season for desired
~ EXTENDS TO h TOP OF BOx erm?nent ve etation. Do not allow Tem Dior cover to row over 12" p 4 P Y 9
0 iti t ~ in hei ht before mawin ,otherwise fescue ma be shaded out. 0`k ` 9 9 Y ~ ?..l
- ~ . ~ 1 ~ r~i
r~ LL V /d~~ ~ `~r__ ~1
a ~ ~ -:n Q Cry . b. ~ldj~t . ~ ~t i.t. to,,
Ui111tY 4NSTALUITIUNS AND OTHER PUBLIC
F- '=v_ ~1'=i FACNJTIES, ~VCLUDII~ S~EWAIKS AND FW+~G1P
f RAMPS ARE TO BE CONStRt~TED ON ALL STREETS / AS SPECIFlED CttY CODE. Tl~SE EAglIT1ES ~
b t~'~~~ ~ ~ ~ i xT..t', ~ , HMIE BEEN APPROVED ~Y THE Cliff OF RALEl6F1
AND SHAH. BE 90 ~ISULIED UNIESS A t~iA1~E ~
IS AUTHORIZED BY NIRIITIEId APPROVAL PUBLIC ,D .OZ
Y~~ ~a ~t~ d >r / liX(.. ~.Yi~.~~•n7K ~~~`l lx1"+Ytci O~ILg ~`r9~~ SANITARY SEyMER fJISE1~F1~trS ARE TO BE RECORDED PRIOR TO FINN. AIC(~PTANCE.

SK~IATURE: H
/ 57 WASHED STONE PLACED TO A HEIGHT r OF 12'-18" MOC ABOVE TOP OF BOX ENGINEERING
o FtrvWON$
DATE- DESCMPTiON aUBuc ununfs
e
vti x- S. No. ~ TRANSPORTATION
T3
STANDARD CATCH BASIN YARD INLET PROTECTION, r 4.14 °0NSER1A70N SHEET 11 OF 13
ci

~:l,~Iz, , ; ~
,c , ~ ~ri i. wA~ : { T "d' ~ i;ln RR ~ . ~~77 r \ QI
I ~ _ * M } ~ .
~ ~ f ~.~f~Ki,~ ti ~4DOI)S ~r~~ _ 1 ~ 9 E - - _ _ i V ~
r'' , ~ 'tl / , , { _ I
, ~ ;r~~ if l i ' ` l _ _ r i
! : ~ ~ ~ w.. P ~ ~ i_ a I-
r i _ L;h ~ & NEUAiN ; r I I ~ ~#'~IICI A~ f ~ ' •t 76 i „ 71ti6 ~ ' C5 00 ~ ~ .
i r ' ~ ~ i s 11 ~ ~ R~~1 t~f9?^98569 I
~ ''1 ~ \ Lp141 I ,l 1 f ' ~ ~ ~ ~ • a
t a ~ ; ~I a~ w
- - ~ ~ -
f , I 1 1.J ~ ~y ~ - I r j W ~~'?(i' ~ r rr ~ . Z T - NT r~
l`v c~ 1~• 5 1; <qq KEYS ON OR fQ111VALE ~ ~ ~ i rr _ ~ 1 j' r - 0.,~ _ _ l 'S, Sa ` ~ I ' r RE AINING WALT a ~3 0
`r - ' ~ 1i ~ °i ~ ~ 4 (DESIGN BY OTHERS) x~ ~ . N Jb~ ~ .K. ~_U{. ~ I
i _ / l , _ dntiel. NC ~ i;B ri94 5t^' j
„ r - ~ SF, ~..1 ~ ! li - we. f< a~w ar ia~M,SF ~ TRIBUTARY 5A y NEUSE RIVER RULE IMPACT SUMMARY p I ~ A
1 ~ ~ ~ ~ ' I , ~ - - i 0 , n/ ~ STREAM IMPACT LENGTH = 115 LF (ALONG CENTERLINE) t• .i
~ ; v,-. ZONE 1 IMPACT AREA = 5,018 SF ZONE 2 IMPACT AREA = 3,868 SF
~ _ - t ' ~ NOTE: AREAS INCLUDE FILL SLOPES STONE
: , t, _ ~ ~ r - R- SCpi: TWIN-10'(W) x 6"(H) ~ -
~ ` ~ E`.~IGNED BY OTHERS ~ , ~ U5 1NV. 36
V- i rfi ,r ~ \ i , i _ r ~ 5 WV. 3.5
~ ~ ( i - ~ ; ~=a~ ~ .
~ l~~
k' i I ~ ~ ' ~ ! i'1 i _ f.
/ ~I~ A ~ ~ ~ S r STS - ~ ' ~ w l
'li Jf ~ t ~ ~ E 5 'S - ' _ s - s ~1' • L~, ~ ~ i
• f. 4.. _ ~ 1 ~ ~ ~ ~ 11 U ~ c~ w ~ .il - III11
~ m _ / - _ / ' ~ ~ nnuunnn~nnn P , . ~ 0 ~ a ~ ~
.<r ~ . _ _ t, ` ~ _ i > ' t Ol ~ ti i + ~,r; ~ ~,~7 ~ Z v O ~
~ ~ ~ ~ ,r,~ _ - i v - _ _ - ~ ' ~ r , ~•c i G ~ g „
o, , _ ~ ` ~ ~n.~ ,i } ~ N p
4~ w ~ ~ \ - ~ ! ~ O O m ~ N ~ ~ ~
- _ _ . • •
~I -'~j i ~ P i _ % GENERAL CONSTRUCTION NOTES:
t ~ L d r 45 LEVEL SPREADER '1~ .
- 1. ALL CONSTRUC110N SHALL CONFORM TO THE CURRENT qTY OF RALEIGH ;
I ~ ~ - - ' , p• ti~ ~ ~ ' % ti ~ ~ STANDARD DETAILS AND SPEgFICATIONS. 2. ALL GUTTER SHOWN WITHIN RIGHT OF WAY SHALL 8E STANDARD 30"
_ ~r _ r • CURB AND GUTTER.
{ a,: ~ ~ r f;~ Q p 4 ; a~ , ~ ,9,~, 0 3. A COMPLETE COORDINATE LISTNrG AND AUTOCAD RELEASE 14 DRAWING FILE o ~ 45~ ~ 94. ~~4~,~. • . ARE AVAILABLE UPON REQUEST FROM THIS FIRM.
Qw ~ ~ - - w~ ' ~ ti i~ . • ~ . 4. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL LOCATE ALL UTILITIES PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF
a v ~ - - fi/ fi / z~ ~ ' GRADING ACTIVITIES. CONTACT ULOCO AT 1-800-832-4949 FOR FIELD
o o P _p~~' . -~,K,, _ _ ~ "n~`~ ~ ~ ~ . ATI OF UNDERGROUND ..~,~r ~ , . LOC ON U1111T1ES. ~ ~ N SHOWN UN F+ ~ „u. ~ 5. ALL DIME SIONS ARE TO BACK OF CURB, LESS OTHERWISE STATED
t~~~ ~t „„~UU~' ~``F~ ON PLANS. " n ~ ,.-a ~~~ut ~ • •
O ~ i ~ \ L { <<~ t ~ V ~ „u ON SITE ABC STONE. W ~ ~ _ ~ . 8. ALL PAVEMENT SHALL BE 2 h2 AND 8 ~ I _ ~ 7. UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED ALL PROPOSED SPOT ELEVATIONS ARE TOP ~
P ~ ti / ~Q~ ~ ~ i ~ - n ~ ; ~ = ~ ^ ASPHALT OR FINISHED SURFACE. ~~II
~ ~ ~ , i I s ~ 8. AREAS DISTURBED BY STRUCTION AND NOT INDICATED TO BE ~`4 , + , SEED ALL CON , i_ _ o ? ~ PAVED OR PLANTED, UPON a01~IPLET1pN OF GRADING ACTIVITIES. USE REBEL 3
~ ~ • ! / FESCUE IN ACCORDANCE WITH SEEDMtG SCHEDULE ON DETAIL SHEETS. ~
i •a ~ I,~ t3tit~ r I'~ ~t rd L i i 9. WATER MAINS SHALL HAVE A MINIMUM 4 OF COVER. ~~,,~~11
i~~fr,gPnSpN ~ : ~ i •B ~b03 PG 11tii ~ ` i ~ u a ' ~ - ~ 10. THE TOPOC~tAPHY SHOWN WAS FELD LOCATED 8Y OTHERS. '~4 _ / ~ , ~y + ~ - ~ 11. THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONS~LE FOR INSURING POSITIVE DRA9IAGE TO ALL STORM
r~lv 079J998213 V1~ " = ~ c - i ~ - ~'.~t1,. J W ~ ;'~~.1 ~ . C r~ I ~ 1 J ~ ~ STRUCTURES.
0 - , - r Z - uf, ~ ~ ~Ft ~>>L. ~ z = y I ~ 12. ALL SANITARY SEWER SLOPES AND PIPE LENGTHS ARE COMPUTED FROM CENTER b: L - \ .
s ~ _ ~ , ~ OF MIANHOLE TO CENTER OF MANFIOLE. _ ~
- ~ - ~ 13. CONSTRUCT ALL SANITARY SEWER MANHOLES FLUSH TO F1NAL PAVEMENT GRADE - ~ ; SCE 12 (W) x b'(1t) • A _ ~ TH R ' OR AS SHOWN IN NON-PAVED AREAS. INCLUDE COST IN BASE BID. DESI NED BY 0 E 5
„„rr re rrrr IR41511p11 TO - ~,,,'~t J US I V. 36.5.3 14. CONSTRUCT All F1RE H WITH BASE FLANGE SIX fNCHES A80VE FlNAL _ I ~ ~r N YORANIS
' R p ~c ~ ~ DS fNV. 365.0 ~ GRADE. INCLUDE COST IN BASE BD. ~ . ,u ~ ' ~ / .
VEOETgED rl~.d ;*"`_~r MN~~~ ~ ~i "~„1r,1 _ ~F . 1 ~lTERSECTK~IS. _ ~'I I i 15. CONTRACTOR SHAH CLEAR ANO C~JB ENURE R~tIM MATHIN 00 OF ALL
wr~i !t; y? +°yw 100 yl' flood fringe 0 "s; s<rwmr, i ~ per flood study. o 0• V, ~ 18. DEVELOPER IS RESPONSIBLE FOR T1~ INSPECTK>N OF THE COINSTRUC110N OF. ALL 0 T , , r~ G- S .,~ti V ~ • :N ~ '6~~'~ :a~E E`'.,'. PRIVATE STREETS. COPIES Of CERTIFIED NdSPEC110N IMPORT'S MUST BE SUBWTTED TO
?a~? sDP'E ,~~i~ ~ + / b Beck W r ~1 0 THE gTY'S gNEERING INSPE TIONS MANAGER AT P.O. BOX 590 RALEIGH NC 27802 EN C , / ~ . ~ ,
OR FAXED TO [phone]. F~1
agar: w w w `"'fie`" w . ; yr.w • c ~ t_1 ;j f itvilr A / , ,
~ wYe ww Yew j y+?y y j y'" \ ' r ~m `"re w w w w y" ~ 34 LEVEL READER R ~ o _ , ~ ~ ~ ~ , REAOE / Q
Ye wwYeYew w w YeYeYe Yn / ~ / ,r N _ ~ M+rj
W Y,w w w Yn Ye ~ O.R, SAtiITAiiY" - ~0 $ANITAKY" . / O ' _ - NOTE: c
Y~ wYYe Yew w w Ye eYaVe YaVeye o - F - t»~1_ ' , YNi eYe'yk, Yo Ya Ye ° n ~8 SL 5, rr f-A~F MtPi r ' ~ L STORM ~FMEN, I d ~ ~
Sd .r a. / ~ Ru _ W
_ i ,r!` _ . a r, . o~ •
'v , - / - / : ~L04Y.RRIAR., FJ~~117 'lFfP` H
STIPItD w M TIN - J _ , - PUCE • t ~ ; ~ ~ / , ~
- i , I- _ _ - ' - - I ~ ~ ; d~
I I- -1 ~I 11= _ - ~ , , -_-1 11_~I ' _ - - - 50 BUFFER/ ~~.a . ~ .I ~t~1 i ~K, ~ '
11 I__I I I I I I_I I hi I I_ I_I I I_I I I I I I_I I ~I I I_ =1 I I I I.I ~ I-III=~ _I I I-1 I I-1 I I-III-1 I I-_~ I 2.• r,%=s, ~ U. ~ , s, ~ r ,
1=1 _I I I-1~-~ I I ~ I_~ ~ I--Ili-T-1 ~ 1-1 I~ ~ ' / , r'., s -r. , - 1 _ r ~ , i
~ I III=1 I I'-'III I i III ~ . , . A ~ ~ _ - ; ~ ; ~ TRIBUTARY 5 1 ~ - .
. , ~ • Rl~r'~jt, 1 NEUSE RIVER RULE IMPACT SUMMARY
~ • / ~ ti ~r_ DETNL OF tFYEI SPREADER CROSS SECTION. ~ ~ . ti%I a, . STREAM IMPACT LENGTH = 125 LF (ALONG CENTERLINE) ZONE 1 IMPACT AREA - 4,053 SF
A f`r'9tEa~ _ i IH.i, 598 ~,p - ~ , _ - ~ ZONE 2 IMPACT AREA = 3,722 SF
• a 0"~; ,~°OAEt ~ • ??3R 1 / ~ ~ NOTE: AREAS INCLUDE FILL SLOPES STONE W ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ . ~ I' ~ ~ ~ fi~
OL STREAM r o I~ ~ _ ~
-Level spreader is designed to disperse small volumes of concentrated flow ocross stabN sbpes. o: ~ ~ ~
Z w TRIBUTARY 5 tip' • ~o
o ~ • ~ . • / ~ ' ~ ~ • _ - ,<Cj~ O
/ ~ ~ TT l~
= LEVEL SPREADER ti t i H V i ~
w a ~ \ ~ . . ' ~ { ~ H
cu ' ~ Mhr'
0 50 BUFFER W . ~ ~ k ~
cv I 'a'_~ ~ ~ 1. yr flood fringe ' A >~r
w p r flood study - - / , ~t, . A4
of ~ 77 ~ ,,i by Becky Wdid, PE " ~tnin~,iu~ i ~I,~~~, _ ~n~iirNU~ III II VIII II111111!l lltll ~IIII11111111,jIIlI{JIIIII I11111111i 11
ci /fir in i niiuniunii nnuuui ~ ~ w i i i i ~ r
N STORM DRAINAGE DESIGN TABLE ~ ~ ~r ~ u ~ ~ N is
STONEHAVENSI~DMSION a. t - V r
~ PIPE SECTION A A C Tc 0(ds) PIPE L Rat t1S DS SLOPE V I D aGb D use , -a- TYRE. - T s9R - - 1f,r .~t H ~ ~.4 ~ 1~. i ~ ~
m r~ TOTAL ELEV 84V 04V %rrh n ~ ~ FROM TO (atb) (t~l) TOTAL ( ) fps { )
.OT .94 0.50 3.99 722 12.09 15 0.0125 RCP ~~SI ~ CB~1 CBN2 0.81 0.61 0,58 5.0 2.68 26 37232 369 308 rn ; ~ L.~ . ~ ~ ° ' ,ti
~ CBk2 FESF3 0.18 0.82 0.58 5.0 3.43 110 312.32 368b4 368.00 0.78 4.96 712 1216 15 0.0125 RCP ' - _ ~ 1 I ~ „ ~7• o. ~ - ~r ~ ; p
N O ~ , _
(r) N CBN4 C89,5 0.40 0.40 0,59 5.0 1.10 28 372.91 3TOM 910.31 0.50 3.55 712 101D 15 0.0125 CLASS4 r,,,- w _ w ` e R
T 1 1 0.51 7 11.91 15 .0125 RCP ''r N CBNS FESMB 0.21 0.81 0.59 5.0 2.60 5 372.9 3101 3.91 3.99 .72 0
~ t n 1 O O
c SCt1 DESIGNER BY OTI#AS 58 38460 363.50 1.89 DESI(>Y~D BY OT1~RS TWIN Bh110' PRECAST n t ~ I N r' ti , s •oS, ti' ~ '3'G3` 5v' N
m in < „'~w? \ ~n ' \ v y
~ SC~2 DES03N~8YOTf~RS 50 965.40 385.00 0.80 DESKK~f44EDBYOTH~RS 5x17 PRECAST ,^Nr.v o r r ~ad~ g \ ~
~ ur a !'~DADL7Tf't Cl'~ATL~ ~ / "'~ti '~ryy~;'F r .1, ~

Lij dt' t Pr tJf t3 Pr , t i{ r. ~ ~
ox> ~ ,a o 20 ,o ea Aso /
Lr) PiN q
o LX t:) ~r, , lE utl~"E2
n IN FECr C
1 inch = 40 M ti ,',2F ' '
N
TJ SHEET 3 OF 13

_ _ F _
l
. GENERAL CONSTRUCTION NOTES. a
11 I 1. ALL CONSTRUCTION SHALL CONFORM TO THE CURRENT CITY OF RALEIGH
~ i! l (i A / I i STANDARD DETAILS AND SPECIFlCAl10NS. ~
V 2 ALL GUTTER SHOWN WITHIN RIGHT OF WAY SH ~ ALL ~ STANDARD 30 ~ CURB AND GUTTER. a
/ ~ - ~ ~ ~ a~,~ ass _ ;I ~ 3. A COMPLETE COORDINATE LISTING AND AUTOCAD RELEASE 14 DRAWING Flt.E ~
_ j ~ ~;a a,~s roc z,e~5 ` r ~ i , I ~ ~ hIN o~®~oesssa , ~ ; W ARE AVAILABLE UPON REQUEST FROM TFpS FlRM. .U 4. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL LOCATE ALL U11U1~5 PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF 0 I
1 ! tar a~ ~ m_ ; ~ _ ~ I , ! r ~ s GRADING ACTIVITIES. CONTACt ULOCO AT i-B00-632-4949 FQR FlELD ~ ~y`
~ ~ ' ~ ; ~ r ~ I ~ • 'Q; LOCATION OF UN~RGROUND UTILITIES. ~ i 5. ALL DIMENSIONS.SHOWN ARE 10 BACK OF CURB, UNLESS OTHERWISE STATED a
; 8 J ON PLANS. AA „ ~ M
n ~ll , - .r _ t 6. ALL PAVEMENT ON SITE SHALL BE Y I-2 AND 8 ABC STONE. ~
~ ~ _ 1-~ Ir ~~i ~ ~ ~ ' is , _ ~ r I 1. UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED ALL PROPOSED SPOT ELEVAliONS ARE TOP OF ASPHALT OR FttriSHED SURFACE. ~ ~ ~ t
~l:- =*r..~ ~ ~ 3 b' n~.' r ~ j.'.;t~vPr .)T.I'...~~I n. N r ~ ~ ~ _ v ~ I"1 ~ < ~ L ~ Id , 3. Li, 8. SEED ALL AREAS DIST'INtBED BY CONSTRUCTION, AND NOT INDICATED TO BE
. PAVED OR PLANTED, UPON COMPLETION OF GRADING ACT1Yi11ES. USE REBEL. 3 ~ FESCUE IN AGCORDANCE 1MTH SEEDING SCHEDULE ON DETAIL SHEETS. ~
~ ~ ~ fl{I!I Sg , ~ ~ ~ / .;'N 07 t 90535 9. WATER MAINS SHALL HAVE A MINIMUM 4' ~ COVER. ~ p
E - 0. 10. THE TOPOGRAPHY SHOWN Was FiEID LOCATED BY OTHERS. q • ~ 11. THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR INSURING POSITIVE DRAINAGE TO ALL STORM IU
~ ~ - I STRUCTURES. w
~ Innn ~ 12. ALL SANITARY SEWER SLOPES AND PIPE LENGTHS ARE COMPUIID FROM CENTER ~
1 ~ i f1~ _'`°r``~;'_ ~ ~ , ~ ~ SC~1: TWIN-10~~W) x 6~~H) z ~ I / ~ i ~ ! , ~ ~ llpyll!! ~ ~=,V ~i~ ; BI• _ , ~ (6ESIONED BY OTHERS •10' W x 6" H OF MANHOLE TD CENTER OF MANHOLE. o
4~ ~ ; ,ex cb roil t~ n ~ rlplll ~ ..:3198. ~ t OTHERS ~ 13. CONSTRUCt ALL SANITARY SEWER MANHOLES FLUSH 1O FINAL PAVEMENT GRADE ~ OR AS SHOWN IN NON-PAVED AREAS. INCLUDE COST 9V BASE BID.
} ~ ~l . ; ~ , ~ U INV. . - !!!!!!!!1 0 ~ a t ~ _ llJll ~ q , -;..,c. ~ S INV. 3.5 - ~ - . .5 14. CON T S1RUC ALL FlRE HYDRANTS WITH BASE FLANGE SiX INCHES A80VE FlNAL
- , z ~ _ - ~ ~ I?1111111~ - GRADE. INCLUDE COST IN BASE BID.
i ~ ~ j~` 1 ~r k i A OITCH ~ , 15. CONTRACTOR SHALL CLEAR AND GRUB ENURE R Wi1HIN 100' OF ALL INTER S. „ ~ , -e JW SEGTION
1 , r~; - ~ ~ ~ ' ~ ~ 0 ti ~ G ~ 18. DEVELOPER iS RESPONSIBLE FOR THE INSPECTKN OF THE CONSTRUCTION OF ALL
~ ,r SEC'1~ PRIVATE STREETS. COPIES OF CERTiFlED INSPECTION REPORTS MUST BE SUBMITTED 1D l THE gTYS ENt~NEERING INSPECTIONS MANAGER AT P.O. BOX 590 RALEIGH NC 27 ~ 602
t I r ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ OR FAXED TO [phone].
~ , ~ '1 ! ~ ~ - _ i ~ TEMPORARY ~f'ENCE ~r ~ - ~ t 1 . 4 r ,l ~i ~ - ~ ~Illllll~ ri'ir~l,
n'htltn?~lll~ta~ ~ ~ ~ INiN~IIiIIiillll t
~ ~ .i > 7 ~ - N
_ I ~ ~ ~ ~rr ~ - ~ I 1 ~ ,F ~aa ~ _ •
• t ,..1i ~l -,.J I I A A. n / ~ ~ ri ~ ! A i ~~i q I, 1, / ~ j~ ~ r~ F C . ~
~ ~ ~ , ~ ~ \ ~ . ii , _ _ . r ~ ~ ~„I ~ ~ II,II I _ I 1 ~tl J/ i ~ . 1- CONSTRUCTION SEQUENCE 9 = \ ~ 11,, ~ g ,,1,1 } ~
a , ~ ~ w ,,11`'` 1. OBTAIN A GRADING PERMIT FROM THE qTY Of RALEIGH INSPECTIONS } m ~ ~ .
. ~ \ i 11 1 \ ~ 1 m r ~ ~o w _ ~ , r,,~`~ ~ _ _ . DEPARTMENT. °
~ \ ~ 7 ry J , ~ ~ 2. INSTALL GRAVEL CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCES SILT FENCE TR PR Tl ~ EE OTEC ON ~ ` .
i ~ ~ r k ~ r-- 1 i R ! ~ ~ 0~ r ~ ~ E CE AND SEDIMENT BASINS PER THE APPROVED SITE SEDIMENTATION AND ~ ~ ` % ~ ` ' EROSION C TROT P ~ ° ~
! ~ ~ tea ~ ~ VA~~~~ !!/p!!!! 68 _ ~~~Q , \``0 ON LAN. CLEAR AS NECESSARY TO INSTALL THE DEVICES ONLY.
i , V n , ~A 6 ~ !/j! ~ i I ~I ~ ~u' a`" V~ tidy t n ~ 1 t~ ,~i 3. CALL 890 3453 FOR ON SITE INSPECTION BY THE CITY OF RALEIGH EROSION
~ ~ _ ~ ~ q~~ 1 ~ ~ CONTROL INSPECTOR FOR APPROVAL PRIOR TO ANY LAND DISTURBING ACTIVITY. I.>~ _ ~'74.b ~ ~ • • • 4. CLEAR AND GRUB, GRADE, INSTALL SITE IMPROVEMENTS PER THE APPROVED
I I ~ ~r ~I~a~, , 7 l o00 I a ; ~ , '9•a 0 # , x _ PLANS. MAINTAIN ALL SdcE MEASURES AS REQUIRED TO ENSURE THEIR PROPER
I I ~ : a~ ~ ~f> ~6 ' ' ~ ~ ~ 11 1111 ~ , ~ 1 " CONSTRI • xl~~~ _ . ' \ OPERATION. ADJUST LOCATION AND HQGHT OF TEMPORARY DIVERSION DITCHES
c 1 ~ \D~D, s i~ • , • AS NEEDED TO ENSURE THAT SEDIMENT RUNOFF IS DIRECTED TO SEDIMENT BASINS. ~ ,
v 5. GRADED SLOPES AND FlLLS ARE TO BE PLANTED OR PROVIDED WITH 111 Illll1I11N11`~ X
i w b ~ ~ P ~ F, , ~ , t-1 u~ll„Nnu ~~y n Flu'` PROTECTIVE COVER SUFFIgENT TO RESTRAIN EROSION WITHIN 15 WORKING DAYS - - AFTER COMPLETION OF ANY PHASE OF GRADING. ALL AREAS UPON WHICH NO A
,111,."' ~1~1 i~' - ~ - . FURTHER UND DISTURBING ACTIVITY Will BE UNDERTAKEN ARE TO BE PLANTED
~ ~ - . J ~ ~ • ~ - - OR PROVIDED WITH PROTECTIVE COVER WITHIN 30 WORKING DAYS. THIS INCLUDES
ti , ~ ~ ;U ~ ~ ~ v; ~ 'T , ~ ~E TEMPORARY SIRE THE AREAS WHERE BUILDINGS ARE Tn ~ LOCATED AND NOT BUILT ON WITHIN THE
; G DET L ON SH ET 1 WORKING DAYS. USE THE SEED BED ARATi i, ~ C~OS~IIr AI_ . PREP ON AND SEEDING SCHEDULE Q1 ~ , ~ FOR SLOPE STABILIZATION MEASURES DETAIL SHEET 11 .
i ' ~ 1J, , ~ , 6. AS CONSTRUCTION PROGRESSES INSTALL PERMANENT EROSION CONTROL r a
t~ .j §~G~ {~i• Q. C i MEASURES SUCH AS EROSION CONTROL BLANKET'S RIP RAP APRONS DETENTION Q r - A ~ r ~1 PONDS, VELOCITY DISSIPATORS, CHANNEL LINERS AND GRAVEL BA C I"'~
_ ~ - ~ j _ c _ ~ ~ I _ , 3003 _ ~ il' SE OURSE, ETC. ~y
SEDIMENT BASIN SCHEDULE ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 0 - z 7 ~ ~ . ' ' ~ ~ ri BFE ~ 2..; 7. WHEN CONSTRUCTION IS COMPLETE AND ALL AREAS ARE STABILIZED CALL FOR E"'I W ~ ( _ _ \ J ON SITE INSPECTION BY THE SEDIMENTA110N CONTROL INSPECTOR. !C
sEDM T eas~N ~ _ ~ , l i • . N II 8. IF SITE IS APPROVED REMOVE TEMPORARY DIVERSION DITCHE SILT FENCE / ~i s,
E ac. . 4 % ' _ I ON ITCH - ~ I NU Q VER ~ ~ I I ~ ~ 2 (W) " ' • • SEDIMENT BASINS ETC. AND INSTALL REMAINING STORM PiPE ORIFICES FLARED DE OTHERS ~
~ ~ `~.5 pl,. - DRAINA AREA .9 0.5 - ~ 'I luuull"~fi` J Illn ~ ,t,~ k ' END SECTIONS AND RIP RAP DISSIPATOR PADS THEN SEED, PAVE OR RIP-RAP ~ tJS INY. 5.3 ~ ! ;
x ~ ~ ~ ~ ~5 / x ~ . ~ ~ Ds'Aw. 3s~o - - RESULTING DISTURBED AREAS. w / - ~ ~ 9. WHEN VEGETATION IS ESTABLJSHED CALL FOR FlNAL SITE INSPECTION.
a ~ j ~ TEM ARY T FENCE ~
?00 food fnn e • M "t•v 'a 3 ' er flood stud 9 ~ y - P y 1 ~ <,1R y .t ~ ~ i - ~i - _ i ~ <,iNA.,~ E.
A 0 ~ 966 CF by Becky Word, PE ~~,,I+I II IIII , ~ ~ i / A ~ i 1 „ ~ - ~ - `\~1 0 ~ W
5 MIN. 5 Mai. ~ ~ ~ ~ , ~ M~1 ~ r _ - ~ ~ ~ ti ~ ~ ~ T/1
WEIR LENGTH 1 ' 10' MEN ~ '~i, ~ / ~ w J L U ~ 16 ) ~ ~ ~ ~ N,~M!~ G 3 ANM $ V l
Q10 O.S x AREA x 7.22 4 CFS 4 CFS ~ ~ ~ PERET . , r~ ~ ~ ~ D8 a 2 P6 70 7
use aava lulu ~ ~ ~>Ert eASM DTL 4.oa sHr.o ~ ~ ~ ~ , . / d NINii ~ oia s~,a,TZ _ +ruu w ~~yy INiIIII 111111 i n' W ININNIIiI II
PLACE 014ERSION OITCH PER DTt. 1.011 9HT 0 ~ . 1\1YS1 ~ / \ O PLACE SN.T FENCE PER D1L 4.0'1 SMT 9 I - - 20 C o a ral~~ ~ / ~ ~ / W ~ ~ H
PLACE ORAVEL CONSTUC110N ENTRANCE PER DTL 4.07 SHT 9 ~ - ` 4".r S~'~` 4 A~kt~h ~ • i ` rlllll c3 r~~ ~ l~, r• ~ -
~ll ~ 1. ~ ! ,~f; fllllfr ~ ~ ~ C (~1nN111MIiiNININII ~l'Il.~~f lil~ \GF: 11 iN11NIIIN~1 _ IIiN~il
' ~ ~1 I Ill~u~,~''~ ~ • ~ 1~ Iryl ""'rmlNll ~ i' \ InmulTtllm ~ I I i _ ~
1 ~ I!!If! ~ rhlr Hlp' = ~~~~j11''"" ;,11. ~,~U r
RIP AP P T AR , ~ l~ urr~ \II\1111 1' ~ r~
STRUCTURE SI ~ l u r a ~ d50 STON / / ~ pr? ~ 1 - L, a.al .Ill h~~. No. Ixwxd SIZE ~ - ~?+nrli ~ - ~ , ~ 1111 ~ h = ;,1"`I ~fi ~
~ / 50 BUFFER/ ' anf?liu ceR ; niu ~ _ ' , ,k r~ g 3 ~,i ~
FE 6 4'x - ti rung ~ ~ ~h, x k` ~ _
i ~ fhrf L 55 x 33 x 4 . ~ - - ti +rff . ! ~ / y ~ ,
L • . ~ ~ IlNiff}~lf ~ ~ / ,i _ , / t.
7 / ~ ~ ' • / - ~ / . PER NIIDOT DISSIPATOR CHART . ~ ~ , ~ • :r S ~ ~
At ~ ~ ¢ ~ r' ~y,~~ 5~ "ryj '
RIP RAP DISSAPATOR PAD ~ ? . ' ~ oe ~e3z Firs _~<,5 - ~ - ~ !b ?~Iti ~~e ,u7:~Rf, _ ~ ~ ~ - / ~/~c,......._._u 1d _
r, ; ~ u ~ ~ , i ~ !i -
1OP10L 510C( PIE Ig1E9 ` _ - OJ ~ Au ~ ,oa~o~. ~ sh ~ C.L. STREAM - _ ! ;
- ~ ~ ~ ~ i / U / o, ~
! ti M tQ .
w ~ ~ / ~ ~ >~n ~ ~ t~ z / ~ ~ ~ ~ v ~ ~~j."1
r-- 1~ ~ v w ~ ~ + ~
J I ~ I _ ~ V~~~~.~
Hll III IL 11111 I ~ T ~ !!!I' ~ 11111111111111111111111 Ilil IIHII IIIII)IIII Iil'{~ Q M rl iii V
w , } TOTAL DENUDED AREA
a _ 50 BUFFER , , F~1 rT, +r'., aM t . 1'"'~1
= 2.3 ACRES _ . , . .,r, o a 1 yr flood fringe ~ I 1 1RhLY'~ ~VOQDS ~ o _ p r flood study ~ ~ 5: . ~ c~ ~.c t~ a i , ~ W
by Becky Wb~d, PF +wnlll+1111111 ( ~ ~"4~,
m F RASE 2 II ill,lll",,,, ~ ~ , 1 IIII IIII II IIJII III III - _ A
~IIIII IIIII1111111 ~1~4.IUIIIIIIIIIIUUI UI11111 i1t~ Q / 'C" ,a, / , pq
o _ MiCr,A: _ ~ ~ OrBr.~, M ~ i ~
'a`~I"F - N ~ _ - UB 1646 f ~ 18 ~ ~ , ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
SOIL & EROSION CONTROL LEGEND - ~~T ty.; ~ ~h ~ ; ~ _ V
~ , - ~ / 7' ~ , ~
ioaaoRARr SILT ~ on~aH aTa+ ~ ~ ~ , ' ; ~ ~ ~ . ~ ~ ~ -X , . ~ ~ 1 fi' ~ ~ ~ _ ~ W W
s c. ~ ~ ~
m Tf 1REE PROlEC1WN FENCE ~ _ ~ _ I I s p111MEL ANO RIP RAP _ _ , „ , F , - F D FLTER eASa~ / i i~ . ~J F^ ~ ~~F ~ ~ J
(U nnnuanuu,uutuunu~ OONSIRUCTId'IlliTS 1 1•"Si1.f~4~.C~i _Y v ~ B
O y _ m N , f:
o CONS'1lg1CTI0N ENTRANCE $TAIAARD CATCH BASH/ ARD x~ \ a ~ ~ ~ ~ d w
MiET PRO CTION , ; t ~ Ji;IdES hA ~x J.+uA y I N g3'0:}~ jq' 1Y K •r r ~ 0
f3kaPJ!~I+,Y t ~ ~ ~ . 4` ~ b ~ ~ -
~ ~ ~~Pi U'7!~~58728 ~ l ~ t, . ~d~~ ~ F+ a w
~ SEE DETAR.S ON SHEET 10 ~.;~r ic3 ~ el CI p U;, : :i; H.r` ~ V, ^797089'28 ~ .
m / ?031 td/F ~ , E~ . ~ ri~~l~
a k'E'~.tYE`h B &~~F?ESa e. = GRAPHIC SCALE / ~ , i ~ rr,, , i?~6~~" ~ 4 ~F f t1 fi
~ 753'. PG '96 ~~F~,.~
10 0 m ~0 10 110 . - N D7c71HC72e GREENE L0 `C 30
N Ds'. 85C G PEA 0 79 718 1 71. >9'. BSC PIA0;978r711~
1029 L J. 1029 D~ y130 16< ' P'ti 019 7yJ ~-2
n iK ice) \
N 1 inch = 40 fL i
n j
(n
SHEET 5 OF 13

+I
SECTB]N THRU BERN 4 Fii.TER - ~ . _
TOPAF CURD NOTES a
vtre irwwcxs sRtl ploy wvaici 1~ THE SLOPE OF 1HE GUITER TO THE CATCH DASiN SBI THE UPHtII _ CARRY RIP-RAV ~i SIDES OF SPD.L4AY e?
~n ~ SIDE SHALL BEGIN 10' FROM THE 1? 3M' IGTE i THE CATCH BASB1, THE SLOPE DF ID' NIN. Q~
Cn1 E r TIE GUTTER m iNE CATCH BASIN ,
~ CEI THE DWNSTREAN SIDE, a. tou. pql of SHALL BEGDV FAI111 I - - MNY6lF ~5 OtRECIED Bt t+~E ENgNEfA ei1x. _ D BTY T+rE ENfY1EEA^--i 1' NAt FREEBfiARD °FM",~
pn1 - THE CATCH BASIN V . ~ . , _ 1 RD'iW ' • ' ~ ~ ~ • ~ . SEEDING SCHEDULE C
_ + $ [Ibi _ i' e-r nl. rpf Aa PVC - 21 STEPS SHALL ~ INSTALLED IN ~ ~ 1 17 r Nt nata tr w NT Nh ALL CATCH SASINS OVER 3' 1N DEPTH, ~ ~ ~ - - - - • ~ Slde ..Q tches. S Does (a 3:1)
pnl a1 I? m s• claM t~ aF Ain DEPTH SHAH BE MEA~ED FRpI TIE p o f~ EE TiE GUTTER TO THE INVERT _ _ _ _ attouEOwtt • _ wBBES . , ~ei~ ~p~ .r
od - - - - wk,Aa I i 5' I OF THE CATCH HASOI. ~ wRES vASrcD STORE ur," J.1:..6 PLANTING RATE qe
25 I/4' 25 I/4' c41 - 3~ SOLID CONCRETE BRICKS MAY BE TA - 1 USED fN ixIXB OR 4x8x16 SIZES. _ I Au 15-Nov 1 Tall Fescue 120 lbs. acre ~ g /
F----~ -r~ _ ~ r AavRpM. Nov 1-Mar 1 ?all F 1 I r - escue 20 bs /ace ~ ~
12' 5' N[~T APPROVED PRECAST S COIERETE BO%ES ACCEPTABLE - oPADE & Abruzzi Rye 25 lbs./acre +J Mar 1-Apr 15 Tall Fescue 120 lbs./ocre
~ - USING STANDARD 5' CASTINGS. li SECnoN TNRU BASIN 6 FILTER Apr 15-Jun 30 H~.flled Common Bermuda Gross 12 Ibs./acre ~ ~ a
Jul 1-Aug 15 Tall Fescue and 60 lbs./acre x
S/8' O.Hs ' ° L 3000 _ Brownto Millet 35 lbs. acre d ) EAwrr RP-RAP uP p / SIRES a SPawAY *''or Sorgum-Sudan Hybirds 30 Ibs./acre ~
P.SL j= ° e , , ~T~-- ErNC. - ' • „r, _ FRONT VIEW W iri ELEVATNI OF STOWWAiER 1' 2'IQN
PAINT WITH RUST INHIBITING T -T-, a - -3 b,u~,o~r,a, A Ta OF BEAN Mil n vASNED sr NTR. dopes (~1 to- 2:1 p~
BLACK PAINT ° ~ ° 6' ~ `r xEP ~ P08~ i-- SrEEL P08T _.__1.TrRt CBOARD NAI _
-~'j 6'I+ 6'-4' MpJFN MAE fABN XT FENCE AEI wavr AAE FAEfRC *rtN. r~OOD sTaeACf rDNE crNM) T Mar 1-June 1 Sericea Lespedeza (scorified) 50 Ibs,/ocre XT FENCE (iEOTExTRf F1JilAC 3'MIN
DETAtI OF ~ ' T ~ r sEntnr"r sroRACE zor~ITOIA~ BasIN cApnilrn (Mar 1-Apr 15) ~ Tali Fescue 60 Ibs./ocre ~ - (Mar 1-Jun 30) Or Add Weeping Lovegross 5 fbs,/ocre
b1 PLAIES I p ~ I ANDARD C.B. STEP -AU stT FEwa oKY wNa AMtNCE Mu ~ -Flu sl DOES Nor ExcEm U/ ~ N~4t1 p h~ m • FOR FEPAYt OF Sli +--LS' RAM. SED7RENT DEPTH
3 N3 KEBABS Is AaEK a conoEwlwaED FLOP i " z f'''~ # 8' LOIG _ -END of 9U iE71CE NEEDS f0 BE AIIbICD uPNU. I ~ a z rENCE FA4URl5. vsE (Mar 1-Jun 30) r A Hulled Common ' s~ "~'F0 ~ " i0P"~ I B r r B lbs. acre roR Awa~R A~ SST a mudog ass /
eAAOE FfIICE a FAwECn+o r i Tall Fescue g(~i 60 Ibs./ocre
GROUT c' ' 6' PLACE CATCAI g~q( IS'RIK g71tN _~_.~1 ~ I Browntop Millet 35 Ibs./acre
A _ b ~ s• YN. caH BILL OF MATERIAL ~ a9t sKElr NAxDUR uv0. OF sEOAOrt F.RLECTED- e'* Qr Sorghum-Sudon Hybirds 30 Ibs./acre °iQ s~Frr aEAN vsTN vw[A TBAS EEVEt Is REApIED ~ Sep 1-Mar 1 erica Lespedeza
MATERIAL LIST FOR CINE UNIT -MAKE ( )UNITS 000 000 _ wtaaR aaRr _ 1 ~ (unhulled-unscarified) 70 lbs./acre
1 C15 X_33,9# CHANNEL 62 1/2' MK-cal e-r ~ _ A - °"°D'~ - And Tall Fescue 50 lbs. acre /
4 l/8' X 1' H,R, FLAT BAR 3' _MK- Al L01°"'" ~ - %AN ELEV~ATioN aoPE -16' p.1DV--_ 2 3/8' x 3' H.R. FLAT BAR 10' MK- bl ar L-~ ~ SI E V) W P - +•1.--- arc ~ninT+in acts W (Nov 1- Mor 1) ~ Abruzzi Rye 25 Ibs./acre - PERSPECTIVE VIEW
2 1/2' STAINLESS STEEL R(1UND ROD 18' _ u a N
8 1/2' STAINLESS STEEL HEX NUTS r _:.t. r-s''e~ r ~cw ~T« Consult Conserva61~n Engineer or Soil Conservation Service for odditional k F~ ~ information concerning other alternatives for vegetation of denuded areas.
4 / 'STAINLESS STEEL FLAT WASHERS °~P - ® 12 _ of -r "1 Ir rn~nto t~ALEL PLANTS TO BE SAVED SHALL BE 3~ - The above vegetatian rates ore those which do well under (Deal conditions; _ ~ ~
CIEVATICH SECTiDN A-A P~ECTED Br FF?IpNG AS SHOViI 1N v itfUCnp[ ~ ta• rYP. !N THIS DETAIL. other seeding rate combinations are possible. For o lawn quality turf, _ ~ f. sceuEKr double or triple rotes. ~ # ~
new ~ 2. CCNTRACTp! SHO,LL INSTALL FENr:DVG DEErEOOrna is PRB7t TO BEGINNING ANY CONSTRUCTION rtr -
TA Ex1Eq i' _ ~ ACTIVITY, M'Tpll TIE S1INCTUE r ~ W - Vi *******Temgorarv -Reseed occording to optimum season for desired q
CI17 OF RALEIGH CITY OF RALEIGH CENTRAt. ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT CENTRAL ENt;fNEERING DEPARTMENT 3 CONTRACTat SHALL CALL FOR INSPECTION CITY OF RALEIGH fir„ r CITY OF RALEIGH r ~v - -1- c r EN M1G DEPARTMEM permanent ve etation Da not allow Tem rory cover to row over 12" CENTRAL ENbNEEPoNG OfPAR711EN EN fLV, Gh~EER 9 Pa g
t y ~ AND APPROVAL ff PROTCCTIVE FEi1CING CI 6' 1 6' PRIIR TO BEGBA~NG ANY CONSTRUCTION are rp/oa otHrlww ar. ~ q,°. ,°~,q REY1S10NS ulh: T/3/w aHww Dr ,tTa DR GRADING REVS _ in height before rr,nwing, otherwise fescue may be shoded out. f2EN510NS ~ATr: r/s/Dn nR.rRRrr er ~~e REVISfONS DArE T 3/00 oRnwN 9r: ~e
CATCH ' o 'O ° o +0~ S~ O ~ PROTECTIVE FENCING SHALL BE LOCATED At OR TEMPORARY GRAVEL & RIP RAP
BASIN CATCH a1TSIDE DRIPLINE OF TRCES AND 1' MIMBIUM SILT FENCE FILTER BASIN DETAIL
STEEL TOP PSI CTBICRETE _ BASIN OUTSIDE SHRUBS O2 Di1ER PLANTS
- DRAVING NOT TO SCALE - STD. ~ 30,12 - pRAV[NG NOT TO SCALE - STD, ~ 30.01 STD. jj 40.04 STD. ~ 40 22 __.____~v_ ~
GRAT PER CITY STANDARDS _ -iVODD FENCE DETAIL ~ ' s-~ USE ~T , ND. 30.13 DR 30.14 GRAVEL CURB INLET SEDIMENT FILTER
' r M r vDA runt
_ - V~_ /1/dT [.vim, ptBtlrE a 3, ~,.C~ ~ ~riecn'~+rn~ A. HARDWARE CLOTH OR COMPARABLE WIRE MESH WITH i/2' OPENINGS SHALL BE PLACED
'n A"`~ OVER THE CURB RILET OPENING 50 TFY1T AT LEAST 12' OF WHtE EKTENDS ACROSS 6~ - 80TH THE INLET COVER AND 1Hf CONCRETE CUTTER (MEASURED FROM THE INLET
SIDE ELEVATION l -"'c-C B A~ - a--,, i
ht--z-a --?i _ _ _ _ - yr PLASTEa ~ b ~.r - l B. STONE SHALL 8E PILED AGAINST THE WIRE SO AS TO ANCHOR R AGARiST THE GUTTER ANp INLET COVER ANO TO COVER THE INLET OPENING COMPLETELY. USE
_ _ : - F, ~i -<.-y~-f TREAD FADE p . r Ncoor is wASNED sroNE SEEDBED PREPARATION C. CHECK DEVICE AFTER EACH RAIN. REPLACE WASHED STONE li n CLOGS wrrH SEDIMENT. 1. Chisel com acted areas and s read to soil 3 inches dee over -
~..c-.. t _ _ P P P P
A A _ W - i PLAN VIEV J 311' H~4NDLES~ A~0 ,I AR[ILHD SINGL PLAN vIEV OF PROTECTIVE FENCING adverse soil conditions, if available. aROEND Su+GLE TR[E- ExPAND AS NECESSARY 2. Rrp entire area to 6 inches depth.
-SEE DETAIL- 1~ 8' NDUNIMI WER 8' DEEP, _ ~ ~ - It' NIN1111N UP TD 6' ° • ° w FI 3. Remove all loose rock roots and other obstructions leavin surface ASHEO GRA LTER 12" WIRE MESH g
Ir >r MfN raaN TDP w curt ° a > - reasonably smooth. and uniform. M~
I' 4 >r IyY o ~ tr - 4. A I o ricultural !ime fertilizer qnd su er hos hate uniform and ~ r ~ SEDNAfM LADEN RUNOFF ee nLTERED WATER PP Y 9 ~ P P P IY ~ ~ I h I ~P • ~ ~ ~ ~ , ° m x wlt so I (s ~ , below
- - ° - _ N sr r i lom. lat Mrs ~i . ° _ / 5. Cont!nue tillage unt,1 a well pulvenzed, firm, reasonably uniform ~f
PLAN OF COVER E ° ° •a • ~ seedbed is re Gred 4 in h de . , ° p p to fi c es ep W
_ 1 ~-2.'-+~ 7008 KI CD1CIKrE ° ~ ~ ~ -6'-0' aL. MW u ,axs; APa>GVU AT cove eACrs ra+ueE PaaWC ` ~ t2. ~ 6. Seed on a freshly prepared seedbed and cover seed lightly with rRarT or THE snaauRE a NOT LBCUY ro CAUSE ~ - ~ seedin a ui ment or Iti ck ft r ee in . A
wcE o ,a SEDIMENT Z~ g q P cu po o e s d g unurES. orT~TE eROVEanES oR uNPROTECrED Ate. CONCR curTER cuRB INLET 7. Mulch immediately after seeding and onchar mulch.
1 _ _ _ 8. Inspect all seeded areas and make necessary repoirs or reseedings
3 ' `Y ~ ~-+-1 PERF~ATED PLASTIC FENCE DETAIL - 2'-/ 1f2, 2'-41/2 -~-+'~'I 1tk. W within the plonting season, if possible. If stood should be over 60X
_ 5'-3' BLOCK AND GRAVEL CURB INLET SEDIMENT FILTER damo ed, reestoblsh followin on final lime fertilizer and seedin 9 9 9 ~ 9 ~
SECTION A-A NUTES~ = A TWO CONCRETE BLOCKS SBIAI.L BE PLACED ON THEIR SIDES ABUTIINC THE CURB AT rates. 9, Consult Conservat;an Ins ector on maintenance treatment and EITI#~t SIDE Of THE INLET OPENING. A 2' x 4' STUD SNN.L BE CUT ANO PLACED P
21 I/1' ~ - - ~ - 1) F(Ni 24' RCP & LARGER USE L e- nm 7 ~.ests~r ~rrc. rHROUa+ THE ourER NoLES of THE SPACER BLOCKS ro BRACE THE FRONT BLOCKS. fert;l;zation after permanent cover is established. RUY1 IUIY IOrOMrb /tA°i[ r
d 6' te~"'-`s,~'rj'1/~ PiPE DIANEIER PLUS l2' F~2 ~ ~ ~ ~ p~K Y grArpr, DARK wwr FRONT BLOCKS ARE PUKED ON THEIR SIDES ACROSS THE RJLET ANO ABUTTMIG THE AR s rArn, Aarta[ SPACER BLOq($,
-~I-~ MINIMUM INSIDE DIMENSION, _ s' S~ 2> 21' x 2/' CASTING V1TH 12' % - ~ I - 'Apply: Agricultural L;mestone-2 tons/acre (3 tons/acre m clay soils) 8 HARDWARE CLOTH OR COMPARABLE WIRE MESH WfTH 1/2" OPENINGS SHALL BE PLACED
SECTION B-B ,I~ ' 15.6 18' P[PE, 21' X 36' j~''----~~ J"~I OVER TILE OUT5IDE VERTICAL FACE (WEBBING) OF THE BLOCKS TO PREVENT FILTER Fertilizer - 1,000 Ibs./ocre - 1 D-1 D-10 STONE FROM BEING WASHED THROUGH THE HCtES Ri THE BLOCK. Superphosphate - 500 lbs./ocre ~D
T VIEW CASTING USED VITH 24' PIPE i DR LARGER. iF PLACED WITHIN - I J C C. NCDOT /5 WASHED STONE SHALL BE PILED AGAINST THE WIRE TO THE 10P OF THE Mulch - 2 tons/acre - smolt grain strove
7ie• apltlD 1 ~ PUBLIC R/V CASTING MUST BE -J ~ BLOI;K. U CHECK DEVICE AFTER EACH RAIN. REPLACE WASHED STONE IF IT CLOGS WiTH SEDIMENT. AnCt10r - Asphalt EmulSlon ®300 gals/acre
af"~~-p yr TRAFFIC BEARING TYPE PER I a____ 3 3//' ~ NCBOT STANDARDS. I~1 PLAN VIEV OF PfN PLAN VIEV OF PRDTECTNE FENCING OVERFl4W
ARClllm SItKtE TREE- 3/1' i u - _ 3>USE 4' % 4' x 8' OR 1' x 8' x r-P ARWIm SItKtE TREE- CxPAND AS NECESSARY SEI?NAENT LADEN W~2E MESH nLTERED WATER
~T. I I/z• 16' SIILID CONCRETE BLOCK. CAST RUi~FF , • e r
/p_I~ y ~ " ~ Y IN PLACE OR PRECAST CONCRETE i0 y+, inFvi - I.+.--y---..~ MEET N,C,DA.T, STANDARBS CURB RdIET ~
ACCEPTABLE. r-a' aw4E IEnw p11Y rnspaxt R7 DETAIL ~f' HANDLE _ uw Burt AravAxi gAtra rAtAx (T .
zt ur a? FOR STEP REOUiREMENit SEE NOTE _ ~ a, p ~ e SEDIMENT '•'o °m 9 e e e e
SIDE ELEVATION 2 ON STANDARD ND. 30.01 NOTES ~ - -I I. ALL PLANTS TO 8E SAVED SFIAL.L BE li4 I I PROTECTED BY FENCING AS SFIDVN iN ~ ~ o • WIRE SCREEN
1N TIOS OETA[l. GRAVEL FlLTER CONCRETE BLOCK 2'x A' STL~O BRACE ~
CITY OF RALEIGH 1.~-_-___- 3'-,. -.-I CITY OF RALEIGH Z, CGITRACTIBE SI4N.L INSTALL FENCINFi PRiUi TO BEGINNING AMY CaiSTRUCTiP! CtTY OF RALEIGH CITY OF RALEIGH
_ , CENiRAI ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT CENTRAL ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT DR GRADING ACTIVITY. CI CENTRAL ENCENEERiNC DEPARTMENT CENTRAL, fNGINEERMG DEPARTMENT
REVISJONS n~?E '/7/ao ewowx s/: nB Ir REVISIONS M/F: 7/!/oA A~uwn 8Y lIB 3. CDItRACT~t SWaI CALL FOR INSPECTION REVS ANO APPROVAL OF PROTECTIVE FENCING REwS1pNS sMrE r/s/~a vaANK nr _'e REVrSfONS arz: r/a/DD DwwN er ire
CATCH STANDARD Patin r0 BECOMING ANr Ct1NSTRUCtI01 BASIN DROP DR GRADiNCi PLANT A~R•~ AT ~++~.xETS ~ ~ CURB INLET PROTECTNE ~""i3 "r''f01''~`E"i ~ `'0~N6" SEDIMENT
CASTiNGS INLET - ' END ELEVATION - - - 1• PROTECTIVE FCTICING SWILL BE LOCATCD AT Q2 - FENCING rAOwr ~ r~ "~r` fiLTER
-DRAVING NOT TO SCALE - STD, N 30.11 -DRAWING NDT TO SCALE - STD. ~ 30.03 OUTSIDE SHRUBS OR OTHER PLANTS. MINIMUM STD. ~ 50.02 STD. ~ 40.13
tN
a
a. 0
w I~S2TE;z, _ 2,__WN 7 wN 50~ MIN. F~
ju BUf SUFFICIENT TO KEEP 1 PUT SO.T FENCE OR ' 'UT SiIT FENCE OR 1REE PROTECTION FENCE UP O 0 ENSURE CONSTRUCTKkI ENTRANCE IS USED. '"i
~ T SEDMIENT ON SOE TO ENSURE CONSTRU I H
z ~ 2. IF CONSIRUCTKNI ON w STEEP CUT OR FILL SLOPE---~ _ ' , THE MUO IS NOT RE1 x CONSTRUCTION ON THE SITES ARE SUCH THAT HE MUO IS NOT REMOVED BY THE VEINCIE TRAVEL- ~
a ~ 2,-3° STONE TO BE USED yy' OR WIDTH OF ~ OVER THE STONE ~ EXISTING (SURGE STONE OR RADROAD PROPOSED STREET, VEHICLES MUST BE W VG OVER THE STONE. THEN THE TNtES OF THE 'EHICLES MUST ETE WASHED BEFORE ENTERING THE
\ PUBLK; ROAD. N .L- 2:1 SLOPE (MAX) ROADWAY BALLAST) WHICHEVER IS 'UBLIC ROAD. H
o GREATER. 3. IF A PROJECT CONTiN N ON TO THE PUBLIC A S A PROJEGi CONTINUES TO PULL MUD AND DEBRI „ NJ TO THE Pl1BLiC RQAD. THE GOVERNING AUTHORITY
r - srblaE DNOtsnN arch WILL CLEAN THE ARFJ wAN RNPOaMr >EIDNG rill CLEAN THE AREA AND INVOICE THE fN1ANCINIY „
`v TIN w.o eAAS~N X01 - RESPONSIBLE PERSON ,~.OSS SEC 0 NErrr"A RESPDNSU3B.m FORM IESPONSIBLE PERSON AS ~tDICATEO ON THE FINANCUI IESPONSIe~rn FaRM. U11L1TY INSTALLATIONS ANO OTHER PU~JC
~i FACiIIiIESr INCLUDNJG S~EWALKS AND lH,A'NDICAP ~
RAMPS ARE TO ~ CONSTRUCTED ON f1t1. STREETS
En CU AS SPEC~D BY Cti`( CODE THESE FACil1TiE5 HAVE BEEtI APPROVED BY THE C(t`f OF RALEIGH
n ~ UPSLOPE TOE- _ POSfiNE GRADE i'0% 410X. i d ~ ~V A AND SHAIJ. ~ SO STALLED UNtFSS .GRANGE
35 MIN. 15 MIN NEW CONSTRUCTION CONSTRUCTION I$ AUTHORIZED T3Y WRTTfEN APPROVAL PUT3l1C
o ~ EXISTING ROADWAY ~ SIDE SLOPES-~'=-,_ ---t 3i49r!a C' ~ SAFNTARY SEN+fR 'fASEtdENTS ARE TO BE RECORDED ~~I,° Bf'I~ PRIOR TO FlNAL ACCEPTANCE - sgFl W
- ~ 2 . 1 (LAAX.} , f~ r T2" MIN E..~
o ~ ~ ~ ~ i \ . 6' MIN. r,,,
~ ~ ~ ~ \ WM
a - ~ FABRIC UNDER STONE ~+~1 ' ENf~i~NG
1.W STEEP CUT OR FILL SLOPE Ga1c PuauC UnLmES . ~ , . w
o CROSS SECTION
i CITY OF RALEIGH ~ F clrr of RALEfCH TRANSPORTATK~1 ~ ~ , , ~
?~N view e( CENTRAL OJGINEERtNG DEPARTMENT CI si G,4k"-~ CENTRN. ENGINfF.RING r~'PARTMENT
_ ___r__._ CoNSE~vATION . ~ ~ ,~1
y REW57ONS Na. 7/3/00 ORANN W a REVS O r~E115lOA5 a?r. ?/3/a, ORAVA 8v ne
DIVERSION _ CONSTRUCTION
DITCH 0 ENTRANCE r~
n STD. # 40.33 STD. # 40.02
a~
m D Y
In SHEET 10 OF 13
O

_ _
. s ; {
_ SLOPES FDR VARIABLE 1i2 EzPANSI~!
SIDEWALK ACCESS RAMP A SEE NOTE S 6' _?4~ .JOINT ~ sff NOTE y3 ON SI~ER ELEVATION RATE ,
SEE NOTE t SEE NOTE 1 c~SSfD ~A 1/1~ EXPANSK)N JOINT- 4' ! SHEET 4 of sNf~r + of ~ F R TAN AR 2'6" - j lo'-o' D S D D ~ ~
4' S10P HW 8 -xmc CURB AND GUTTER 6, 3'
_ sAEwNx $ ~ ~ 5' SfDE DI 03 5' siDfwaLK ~ • '
r ~ • 7, i/2' EXPANSION Sri
4, W rt - - O
89'._ "GRAS`. n AO 82 # 89'._ CRASS STRIP D ~ 7' 1. 30' CURB & GUTTER
SEE NO1E 1 ~ svr T - - - - a
SYIEWR.K SIOEtiNN " ~ " . ~ . ~ ~ n • " " SIC o ~ ~ 03 a
EnN A DETAk SHOWING lYPlCAI. IOCATKIN SEE NO1E i P iP/dN FACE OF CUR -OEPRESSEO cuRe m t0' iZ
I OF SIDEYVALK ACCESS RAMPS, PEDESTRIAN ~ c 1~-~" iw,w af:ossiuEK 5sruiK_ ~ =15' R=~° AA ~ 1 Y
CROSSWALKS AND STOP BARS. ~ ~ ~ % ''~~16'-Y4+;iI~i ~ i 5 5r ' BB - 9 _ CC 7, 30,
A A ; DoueLE wHEEiCNA~t RAMPS ARE ro BE SIDEWALK ACCESS RAMP ~S RAMP I~' ~ ~ r
" avr INSTALLED Ai ALL PUBllC STREET rNruBEE YA' IMERSECitONS WHERE SiDEWALX tS ° . ° ~ ~ f ' ~
3rr yr ~fkNR£D. WHEN SI TDEMIAU( (DEPRESSED QUiRED, 2' v' 2'-6' 2 -6' 2'-6' 91 I _ _ _ _ _ r- - _ SLSFE=311' / FT.` I
AT AU RAMP COCAnONS AS SHOWN C AA 42 p DEPRESSED CURB ~ - EC1fIfD% ! r-----10' ~
~ ~ SHEET' SEE NOTE I SEE NOTE i 8.5'{UNLESS OTHERWISE SPEC1FIfD%_ ~ 1 vi 71r1• sTro a+R i 'EXPANSION JOINT p B -C _ o
/z ~ ~ - O ->t~' PANSION JOINT srAnawB T e' _ L. _ eum a currER w A3 2, 30' ROLLED TYPE GUTTER ,o
SgEYINx a` 1 'i S7'JEWN K FAC( OF CiR! ~ ~
t Ili' o . .00 i MCK Q plD t o N
4 ~ ~ S!DEIYN.M ACCE55 P1NP 2 I /2') x I L ~ L- N
]3 SECTION B-B STOP ~ S,~CTION ~,A~A„ I LIP ~ CaITTER ~ .00 - -1----_ -
r~o' - ----~i FOR N,L Pt~1IC STREET T!E-iNS I'~--- 1'-tl 3/% --~?I 540EiYN,N _ -ET DE-iNS ~ 1' utp+t=iv rr 1--A --B `-C
, ' . , • ~ PLAN VEIV
DETAA SHOWING TYPICAL LOCATION OF SIDEWALK ACCESS RAMPS ve• PEDESTRIAN CROSSWALKS AND STOP BARS FOR TEf INTERSECTION. ° ~ m ~ ° L.
L-~ 12" SLOPE iZ:]MAX (5'-4" MEN. SAX (5-4" MIN. nc>xz sstc cuRp ~ ,05 ` 9 3N' i
sre' err ! Il~NDARD P 6' I~ ~ CIIRI 6 WTTER _ _
~''t--'--i'I ~ ~ if - I 5 90EYLYl! f%PArvSgN J91R f%PArvSgN J01R _ _ - - 3. 30' VALLEY TYPE GUTTER ~ / NOTES•• ~ . ° - - ~a oR it ,
~y i i - •ry ; ~ n = ~ "cis ~ ' 1. 10' MAXIMUM BETWEEN CONSTRUCTION JOiN1S, i ° ~ ° - --E-- - -
~ d, • s1oP 3,a ExPNS1oN .a»~7 15' MAXIMUM BETWEEN CONSTRUCTION JOINTS ~ '
D R --~-i 4 yr I-- --?Ir t-~--- s~iwr CTION '~B~ ON MACHINE POiJRS. r-a' ~ r-~• z-c' _ ~ Iq ~
SECTION A'A rnus1O u%E~ \ FOR RAMPS AT ASPHALT i0 ASPHALT STREET TYPE DRNE ' STREET TYPE oRnrtwars 2. iJ2" EXPANSION JOINT EVERY 90'. - T _ ~ ~
~ V OR PRIVATE STREET TTE 1N. , Tif 1N SECTTDN A A SECTION B B SEC ION C C SHEET 2 OF 4 3 3000 PSI CONCRETE MINIMUM, 4" SLUMP MAXIMUM. 1 OF 2 H Z
TAN ARD 24' X 24' DR(JP INLET CASTING _.v-~ OEVaEm~a~""~ 5 D Ci1Y OF RALEIGH CITY OF RALEIGH CITY OF RALEIGH
CITY OF RALEIGH CITY OF RALEIGH CENTRAL ENGINEFTtANG DEPARTMENT FOR RAMPS AT ASPHV.T TO ASPN4LT STREET GENiRAt ENGINEERNG DEPARTMENT CI ARTUE.Nr 4. LIQUID MEMBRANE CURING COMPOUND SHALL MEET CENi~u DEpAaTI~NT NOTES: pEPART~aENT cENTRAt ENGINEERIRG OET' THE REQUIREMENTS OF SECTION 1026-2 4F NCDOT
REY15lONS arz 7 t~wm ai ire TYPE DRMiNAYS OR PRVATE STREET 7>E IN. RENSiONS a~. ~ ~ a~EM+r Br 77d RE175 u~re T ec au~ Br rH TAN AR S do SPECIFlCATlONS FOR ROADS AND REVISFOMS nAn: I/3 00~ rwAwr+ Br Jf8 1. IN ADDITION TO THE ABQVE CURB ~ ,/3/~ eRAwW RE17510N5 /s1 S 0 0 SECTION TRANSITION, THE GUTTER SLOPE _
DROP SIDEWALK SIDEWALK ACCESS STRUCTURES. CURB TRANSITION SHALL CONFORka TO NOTE t CURB TRANSITION RAMPS AND OF STD, 30.01 TO 2 -6
INLET ACCESS CASTING RAMPS TYPICAL LOCATION 5. ALL CONSTRUCTION JOINTS SHALL 8E FILLED GUTTERS 2, TRANSITION NOT TO BE LOCATED VALLEY/ROILED GUTTER WITH JOINT FILLER AND SEALER iN ACCORDANCE
_ _ STD. 30 13 ~ STD. # 20.11 STD. ~ 20.11 WITH NCDOT ROADWAY STANDARD DETAIL 846.01. STD. ~ 20.21 WITHIN THE CURB RADIUS STD. ~ 20.21
DRAWING NOT Tp SCALE P _ _ -
CITY OF RALEGH ws~E saPE t ws~tt Si cwt
SIDEWALK ACCESS RAMP. "OT rO oxEm "~_"O 2:7 ~o* m Lxatp R
D GENERAL NOTES ~ t--e yr -r-~ vr ------?+~-e vr-1 T 1 ~ ~
15'-C I 15'-~ r--..._._. T. hnRTH CAROIRW+ GENERAL 57ATUTE 136-44.14 REOIARES Tk4T ALL 6'-0' J'1' MM. i 6'-0' % ~ 6' -'u' Y<' w 15''~ MONOLITHIC POUR OF _ _ _ _ ~ Z £ 6' -'u' Y<' 1RlL B'-0' /
STREET CURBS BEN4G CONSTRUCTED OR RECONSTRUCTED FOR M4NTENANCE _ . ~ PROCEDURES, IRAFFx' OPERATIONS, REPANPS, CORRECTIONS OF UTILRiES OR r s~o~eAH~ 3000 PSI CONCRETE ~ g ~ IC n~ q ~ ' ~ ~ ~ ~a
ALTERED fOR ANY REASON AFTER SEPTEMBER I, 19.'3 SHAL1 PROVIDE SiDEWAtK Cl;wB P ~
_ _ ACCESS RAMPS FOR THE PHYSICAI.tr ?MNDICAPPED AT A<1 INTERSECTIONS WHERE ~ BOTH CURB AND GU11ER AND $pEWALxS ARE PROVIDED AND AT OTHER POMJrS ~ ouNVr ,,}~Prt~s y C~ CUirEF K ~ w a
OF PEDESTRW4S FLOW. cuaE W ADDITWN, SECTK)N 228 OF THE t973 FEDERAL A1D HIGHWAY S~IFE11` ACT ~"N0"A0 ~~'N0'~0 ~,HF > ~ ~ ~ a <
REQWRfS PROVISION Of DEPRESSED CUR85 ON ANY CURB CONSTRUCTED AFTER cuRa curet ] ~ JULY 1, 197s WHETHER A SrDEwux Is PROaosED ~NrTwar oR rs PL,wNEn FQR SECTION "C-C" ~ ~ ~ ~
A FUTURE DATE. a ~ TNf AMERICANS WITH DiSABNlTES ACi {ADA) OF 1990 EXTENDS TO M4DMDCULS DOUBLE ACCESS RAMP ESS RAMP x „ F ~ ~ a ~ g ~
~ ~ WITH DiSABtL111ES COMPREIiENSIVE CMt RIGHTS PROTECTION SIAFIIAR TO THOSE D q PROVIDED TO PERSONS aw THE sASrs OF RACE, SEX, NATpNIL oRxw MID 1~1 k ~ ~ ~ i ~
RELIGION UNDER THE TiEE CML RIGHTS ACT OF 1964. 114E ADOPTED SIDEMN.K _ a ACCESS RAMPS NAVE BEEN OE'S1GNE0 i0 COA~LY WfTH TITt.E' !H Of THE ADA, ~ ~ _ ~ ~
- _ ~ 1HAT BECAME EFiEC1A'E ON JMIUARY 26, 1992 ANO AS AMENDED, ~ ~ ~ _ ~ ' OVA r E ~ e a
C~--_~ O THE A04 REQUIREMENTS FOR DETECTABLE WARNINGS WERE SUSPENDED EFFECTNE 17'-A' f _ _ - - - ~~-r T-1' MIN. 6'-0' ~ " ~ ~ ~I W 'r., E~ a 4 e ~ a ~ [
L.~~~ WY 12, ,994. ~ 2. 510fWALK ACCESS RAMPS SNAIL B£ PROVIDED Ai L iG1TpNS AS SHOWN CW THE 5:=vN,x vN. '~~PS Mor-, ..__-_.6~~~.___ -BACK 6 SiOEVACK `h, ~ ~ ~ r ~ ~q 1 A N x ~w ~ ~ ¦ ~
PANS OR AS DBRECIED BY THE ENCn%EER. SK)EWALK ACCESS RAMPS SHALL ~ ro " i1 LOCATED AS BYOlptlfp N THE DETAi HOWEVER. THE LOCAiION MAY BE ADJUSTED 6• W D< -LRi x ~ - ~ = C
. A ~ t- V AS DfRECTED BY 1FfE f1V(i14EER 1YHERE FXISTI//G UGHT PQI(E5. FIE 1110RANT5, o r . , ~ e 0 A M • ' C - DROP NIETS, ETC. AifE>;T PUCE]FEM. Al ALL LOCATIONS, NOT 1fSS TITAN 2 FEET N "N T gy ~ a W x d a 3 ~ L r r ~ ~ i ~ yaa
SIDEV~Ik ACCESS Mllf - ~ C___~ ~ ~ OF FIAT. HEICifT CURB S?W.L ~ PLACED BETWEEN DOI~LE RAMPS ESS RAM _ ~ .I ~ 7
~ LCHUR RAMPS ARE TO BE iNSTAllE17 AT ALL PUBUC i ~ _ DOUBLE WHEE STANDMU CJRB L~ LIP N07 T? EXLEEB U2' STREET INTERSECTIONS WHERE S~EM'ALX IS REQUIRED. WHEN SIDEIYALK IS N01 CE0 U2' 3.5 RADIUS \ ~ g
TD 6EPRfSSFO AT ALL RAMP LOCATIONS AS SHOWN YI RfOU~ED, CURB IS ~ ~C--INPRESSED CIXtB o ON SHEET , ~A ~ @
VA'v m i5 ~ i ~
3. THE wALxx4G SIARFACE S?4At1 ~ SL1P RESISTANT. C~xORS FQR THE RAMP I SFiAL1 BE DARK CHARCOAL GRAY FOR CONTRaSi WITH LIGHT PATFIWaY COLORS ~TION "D-D" "D-D" \ ~ ' i i ~ ~ e ~ ~ \ i ~ 4
1 AND tJCHT CONCRETE CRAY FOR CONTRAST WiTH A4RK PATHWAY COLORS AND ~ ~ SHALL BE AN N4TECRAL PART OF THE CONSTRUCTION W iERNL 1iCN OIDOE Y h ~ Y ~ m a iW M C `
PIGAiE14/ SHALL BE USED AT THE RATE OF 25 LBS (tF (T PER CU j YARD OF CONCRETE. ~ ~ ~ 1 •
B s[eEVALK-.. SECTION B-8 4. eo SLOPE oN n,E s+~wAU~ Accfss wuw SHALL ExcET'p i /i' (r2:r) u~ ~ ~ qC a ~ 7 ~ ~
~ ~ GRADE ~ ~ S~7' GRASS STRIP r~ ~ ~ €
Y-y __-------y, 5. NCI NO CASE SHALL THE WIDTH OF THE SIDEWALK ACCESS RAMP ~ f.ESS za nr ~ ~i~~y -11f t._- ~ _ ~ f I~i -p t ~ ~ ~j
Y~ THAN a0` (3"-4? NITWEVFR, RAMP kAr ExCEEO 40". r-u ur R. V ~ ~ ~ ~
6. USE CLASS A {3000 PSi) CONCRETE WITH A S10EWALX FNHSH !N ORDER TO 1 vz• OBTAMI A ROUGH NONSKID SURFACE. ~ ~ ~ x
i yr ~ 7. A 1 'EXPANSION d'ON4T WQL BE REQtNRfD WHERE THE CONCRETE SIDEWALx N ~ ~ ~
t yr = ~ ~ ACCESS RAMP .IOMVS THE CURB AND AS SHOWN OTd THE STANDARD DRAWING. .F. ' • ~y ' e, ~ ~ ~ ~n
8. SINGLE OR DWCONAL RAMPS ARE NOT PfRMiSStBLE FOR NEW CONSTRUCTION, ~ • y ~ % ~ d n i t4 d
vi'--{ ~ yr r--'--+'-vi' -'y}~-"-+ >/r-~"~ ExcfPr As SHOWN ON sHEEr 1 OF a, '.2 ~ ~ 5i0~ SHEET t OF 2 ~ SHEET 2 OF 2
SECTION A-A i r SHEET 4 OF 4 ~ r r - 6. SpEwA~K B• ~ CITY OF RALEIGH CITY OF RALEIGH ~ CiTI' OF RALEIGH t
T A T CITY Of RALEIGH CITY OF RALEIGH C STANDARD 24' X 36' DROP INLE C S LNG ENGINEERNG DEPARTMEN! CENTRAL ENGINEERING DEPARiMfJ4T CENTRAL ENGINEERING DEPARTIJENi w*rFt: ~ CENTRAL ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT \ ` CENTRAL ENGINEERING DfPARTr,(ENT / ,
I d I-= , RFYiSK1 / / ~ p%F q,~%`r`--5%p~ -1 Rf1'15101V5 oarz ~/SJoo awR+ er: ne ~ ~ < RENSIONS ~:~+~F T/ale ~2rAw er rs N$ MiE 7 300 ORANt+ B! JiN
REV?SIDNS arE T/sNo ow~wN to ,ne REIISIONS aiF ~/c/oo puwu or ae ISOMETRIC VIEW RFC $TANDAR[3 SIDEWALK RI AY - ~ ~ ORlVEWAY SIDEWALK D ~ - ~ ~
DROP INLET ACCESS A S AND ~a AND CCES RAMPS SIDEWALK DETAIL SIDEWALK DETAIL
CASTING RAMPS -
_ _ STD. 30.14 STD. 20.11 DRAWING NOT TO SCALE ~ STD. 20.11 W STD. 20.01 STD. ~ ?0.01 H
a
5' rnax
a hank height ~ ~ `Stream channel
w fipw J j 0
W . } ~
~ ~ . c~
z Surface Dow Y ~ Ar t?Tig~Ta1 st[er,mbenk
diversion
H A
r r' ~ i%'" - -
lemponry ~ceess
. r ~ ~ U1ILfi1' INSTALlAT1oNS AND OTHER PL~BUC FACILmES, MICI.UDNJG SIDEWALKS AND tIANDICAP ~
~ . h RAMPS ARE TO 8E CONSTRUCTED ON ALL STREETS
Stan$ a h ~ cbth pPr~ ttect~on \ - - ever 5:1 max, sbpa on road AS SPECIFl® BY CfiY CaDE. THESE FACILITIES
m _ CV HAVE BEEN APPROVED 8Y TTY CT11f Of RALEIGH r°°~~~~rw~sora4l~E~
L Q . AND SNAl1. BE SO ~1STAl1E0 lgJIESS A CHANGE y+~" ~ t~ 1S AUTHORfZEO BY WRITTEN APPROVAL. PUBLIC
Q C h-t SANITARI' SEWER E~SEiI~NTS ARE TO BE RECORDED r•
O Z TEMPORARY S7 DETAIL 6.70 MICE. PRIOR TO FlNAL ACCEPT'
rT SIGNATURE; ~ 4~ "
° W
cn J H ~y~~~~~p~~y~ , Q'i ENGINEERING vS r
Q rt,`
ELI , Q1 PUBLIC UTTILITIES , , w H
C l7 ' / TRANSPORTATION U~
1 Q Z CONSERYATIfkI - ~
w Z O
i- i 6J ~
O
C. n /
c m
D Y
LO D y ~ SHEET 11 OF 13
O

EXISTING RINGLAND ROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY
SHOWN AS yATCHED AREA PER WAKE CO. MAP
KEYSTONE RETAINING WALL
GENERAL NOTES 0
~ 1. BOUNDARY INFORMATION WAS TAKEN FROM A
m MAP PREPARED BY PEACOCK LAND SURVEYING,
o BENSON, NC, 27504, MAP N0. 99-0816-C, AND
KNEBWOR H rY REPRODUCED BY S.D. PUCKETT ASSOCIATES, ~ DURHAM NC. E%ISTING IRON PINS WERE FIELD
O CHECKED AND SHALL BE PROPERLY INDICATED ON
o ~ THE FINAL PLAT. ¢ a 1. CITY OF RALEIGH SUBDIVISION ~5-44-01
~ w 3. STREET TOPOGRAPHY WAS OBTAINED BY AN ~ w
} ~ ACTUAL FIELD SURVEY BY S.D. PUCKETT ¢ ~ ASSOCIATES, DURHAM NC.
~ 4. DOWNSTREAM SS MH EXISTING INFORMATION
HOWARD RD WAS APPROXIMATED; ACTUAL ELEVATION OF
ROAD CROSSING #1 EXISTING INVERT AND PIPE SIZE TO BE FIELD NEUSE RIVER RULE IMPACT SUMMARY VERIFIED.
_ 5. ANY LAND SUBJECTED TO INCLREASED WATER
STREAM IMPACT LENGTH= 141 LF (ALONG CENTERLINE) = LEVELS SHALL BE DESIGNATED AS "FLOOD ZONE 1 IMPACT AREA = 5851 SF w "
/ ' ~ ' ~ STORAGE AREAS AND DELINEATED AND RECORDED ZONE 2 IMPACT AREA = 4129 SF ¢ IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 10-3057 OF THE
/ 11 ~ ~ ~ I I NOTE: AREAS INCLUDE FILL SLOPES/STONE ~ CITY CODE.
~ ~ i - I ~ p 8. LOT DIMENSIONS ARE APPROXIMATE. ~ 7. A CONDITION OF APPROVAL OF THIS PLAN WILL
r h' ~ ~ r BE THAT THE OWNER SUBMIT A PETITION FOR
Q ~Q ~ I ANNEXATION AFTER THE APPROVAL OF THE PRELJMINARY PLAN, AND RIOR TO RECORDING OF
2 ~ ~ ~ ~ Q ~ N/F LOT 4, PHASE 3 q ~ I - PARKLYN MOODS S/O ti ^ ~ I ~ I
\ ~ ~ u ~Q ~m / S 73• Zo ~ I ROAD CROSSING ~2 LOT OR ISSUANCE OF ANY CONSTRUCTION PERMITS. NEUSE RIVER RULE IMPACT SUMMARY CONTACT KAREN DUKE 0 890 3656.
40 m i 2 VICINITY MAP n.t.a. B. NEUSE RIVER TRIBUTARIES EXIST ON THE STREAM IMPACT = 136 LF (ALONG CENTERLINE) PROPERTY. APPLICATION FOR PERMIT TO CROSS
4 F I ~ t ~ ZONE 1 IMPACT AREA = 4062 SF TWO NRBR STREAMS (SECTION 401) IS MADE TO
I Q1 151.5 , 13 , \ ~ ZONE 2 IMPACT AREA = 2765 SF NCDENR-DWO. PERMIT PENDING. ~ 9. THE SITE HAS BEEN INVESTIGATED FOR THE
.sJF4 , , ~ ~ n ~~'1L NOTE: AREAS INCLUDE FILL SLOPES/STONE PRESENCE OF WETLANDS BY COOPER
cV ~ $74 4 , , ~ ~ / 1~ ENVIRONMENTAL, INC., 2300 SARDIS ROAD NORTH SUITE 0, CHARLOTTE NC 28227. PHONE
~ 0 8 ~ I 8 3 ~6 •6 f ~ e v ~ O / , 704.845.2000. NO SECTION 404 WETLANDS EXIST
~ ~ ~ \ 5~- $ BEYOND TOP OF BANK, AS INDICATED. 10. CURRENT PROPERTY OWNER: KARAM, MICHAEL
• ~ ~ 18 E , ~ ~ - ~ % ) N/F GERALD T. LUTz Q7 0 ~ 431. 8 Lurz 0. 8 MARY, 82
I DB 4508 PG 4a4 I w~. - 10 ~ ~ `OE A 1 4 11. THE BUILDING CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE TO VERIFY ALL BUILDING SETBACK
~ R N/F T.P. RINCLAN / W J 4 OB 8199 PG B \ _ REQUIREMENTS WITH THE INSPECTIONS DEPARTMENT.
, \ 12. COUNTOURS, SOILS AND PLANIMETRICS SHOWN ARE FROM WAKE COUNTY MAPS AND ARE
~ , ~ 19256 SF I
~ 1 SF ~ ` ~ ~ I ~ ~ (O \ ~ ' 11250 SF / ~ 1 / SUMMARY APPROXIMATE. 13. ALL LOTS TO BE RECORDED AT ONCE. NO ~ PHASING IS PROPOSED.
_ \ ~ ~ / 1. TOTAL AREA: 6.39 ACRES
. ~ ~ ,NCO ~ / 3
R FT ~ • . / o~ w _ 126 SF A & _ D _ 1 s r, S SI o e ~ 2. TOTAL NUMBER OF LOTS: 15 EA ~ _
T , 13261 RD ~ '47' BFE 369.5 ~ n - ~ ~ l ~ w ~ 3. WAKE COUNTY P.I,N.: 0797.05-19-0179
L cr ~ . r \ BUC UTIL ESMT Q 4. DENSITY: 2.35 UNITS PER ACRE
, / .
1 / ~ 0.00 ~ 5. STREET RIGHT-OF-WAY: 1.1 AC
. ~ ,~,1 . ~ w ~ 294,74 ~ 15 6. MINIMUM /AVERAGE LOT SIZE: 10890 SF / 15362 SF
~ ~ 17432 SF N 84 25 ~ MINIMUM LOT WIDTH 65 FT
~ 14 yy 91 ~ BFE 370.3 ~ MINIMUM CORNER LOT WIDTH 80 r?
p •as c ~ o o ~1 0 MINIMUM LOT DEPTH 100 IZ
I / REQUIRED SETBACKS
f ~ ~o°o° ~ ~ti / ~ r 5 CONC. SW / / , _ t~ I FRONT YARD 20 FT, REAR YARD 30 FT, AGGREGATE 40 F1' ~ SIDE YARD 10 FT, CORNER SIDE YARD 20 FT, AGGREGATE 20 FT
~ ~ / ~ /
85 LF GUARDRAIL ~ • ~ / I ~ d ~ 7. PART OF AN APPROVED SUBDIVISION: CLIFTON HILLS, WAKE COUNTY
/ OR 3 HIGH WA W ~ I EL ti ~ / 00 29.00 . , 8. ZONING: PROPOSED R-4 SINGLE FAMILY
~ I ~ N/F M. KMA~Mn STE4~!! 1. 9~C'ARDSON ~ J ~ ~ 100 YR FLOOD
~ \ 1, ~ D8 6825 PG 165 m STORAGE BNDY 9• INSIDE CITY LIMITS: PENDING ANNEXATION
40.00' a / ~ ~W / , I ( ~ 'L`-'~~~ ~ I 10. INSIDE PRIMARY FIRE DISTRI^,T: NO INDEX
/ s I co , ~ 11. INSIDE FALLS P RRY ~-1 PLAN E CREEK, OR SWIFT CREEK DRAIKAGE AREA: N0 CE-2 RMGLAND RQAD P&P
_ ~ Io ~ 5 I ~ ; ~ o 14 ~
~ ~ ~ 30660 SF ~ 12. INSIDE FLOOD HAZARD BOUNDARY: NO CE-3 EROSK)N CONTROL PLAN r CE-4 OUTFALL A 8t B, STAB ROAD
~ o 1304 SF p ~ ~ 13. FLOOR AREA RATIO: ~I/A X-1 CROSS SEC'T'IONS 10+00'13+00
? ~ ~ ~ / BFE ~ i ~ 14. OMIT X-2 CROSS SECTK~IS 13+60.17+00
~ i ~ W / i x-3 CROSS SECTIONS 17+50-19+50
/ • i • • i ~ ~ ~ ~ LOT LINE (TYP.) 15. DEDICATED GREENWAY: NONE DTL-1 STREET DETAILS
~ ~ 16. DEVELOPER: STONEHAVEN LLC, 7200 STONEHENGE DR. 3D6 RALEIGH NC 27603 PH. 919- 7 -1 DTL-2 UTILITY DETAILS
/ / 1 ; / ~ / ~ ~ 8 0 262 DTL-3 EROSION CONTROL DETAILS
17. DB 2877 PAGE 0624
\ ~ ~ 58 ~
6 E ~ ~ N/F K G, PEREZ I ~
~ ~ 88, p3' 6 DB 41 Pc 7D7 N \ o _ 3 Z NCDENR-DWQ REVISION DELETE lOT ~6 8/21/01
~ EX. 12 PUBLIC SS ti ~0 / ~ ~ ~ ~ yy ~ rn i a p l
NCDENR-DWQ REVISIONS 7/z5/ol
\ ~ 4 R W ~ RW
ZONE 2 ~ ~ ° / ~ / ~ ~ 10964 SF ~ Q COR COMMENTS s/e/o1 45 WITH SIDEWALK 40 WITHOUT SIDEWALK
~ N/F CNL e. 'n 'Q~ ~ 9 / -1 /I DB 7832 C 8 ~ T ~ c / / Z RIGHT OF WAY ~ Z
~ ~ , ZONE 1 ~ • • - ~ / / W No. Revision/Issue Date , ~ 0
~ ~ ~ f 1.0 5.0 3.5 26.0 3.5 u
\ ~ TOP BANK - _ 1 p, / SIDEWALK U11lITY STRIP RDADWAY ~ ~"'~j MIN,
2.5' 10,5' 10.5' 2.5' W ~ TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERS AND STIE PLANNERS 0 16 ChancKy Place, Durhom NC 27707
/ i TOP BANK - • • ~ R35.00 ~ ~ ~ I ~ 2:1 MAX. 4. Phony or Fax [phone] EmaR pree~ttddOtnlndaprinq.oom
~ i % / N N 7 / 836 SF ~ / ~ F Imn
f r ~ ZONE 1 ~ R ~ ~ / z + ~s ~ 0 CARD
~ \ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 19065 SF N 0~. / PAVEMENT DESIGN 1 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Z ~ • ss i ~ N 4 E~ 5 0 RI T a OF 4 WA o Y ~
• ~ ~ i 7~ONE 2 N „ 1 ~ .a 6~ A.B.C.--40 ROW SECTION OA x s
~ rJ0' BUFFER t , . ~ N ~ ~ 37.50 ~ N/F IMILIAM C FRITTER WAY ECT 0 . 8 A.B.C.--45 ROW SECTION ~ SEAL.
' DB 3528 PG 50 \ C 22508
36 1 N I ~QTE; NORMAL CROWN OF 1 /4" PER ~ FOOT UNLESS OTHERWISE DIRECTED 4~ ~ '`~NCINEE~''
~ \ ~ 32.1 / cf0o I / 11 \ N/F MICHAEL P. SAVILLE ~ gi ~ ~F~? BY CITY ENGINEER. ~rj SAN R~
DB 7846 PC J81 \ S ~ ~ I 11077 SF 'awl P a+~' f/111111
~ ~ / I Project Nome and Addreea
8 ~ 0 ~ 5.1 fig. ~
1117 F 6 ° ~ 8S r r
~ ~ I I
~ - 9 ~ - - 1 11426 SF
/ 11214 SF I / ~ / i i 1 UTILITY INSTALLATIONS AND OTHER PUBLIC
i N JAMES M. BRANNON / ' ~ DB 4713 PG 867 30~~ STD. CONC. C&G FACILITIES, NCLUDING SIDEWALKS AND HANDICAP 8200 KNEBWORTH COURT RAMPS ARE TO BE CONSTRUCTED ON ALL STREETS
I ~ I ~ 385. ~ i AS SPECIFIED BY CITY CODE. THESE FACILITIES CITY OF RALEK3H
` ~ R 13 HAVE BEEN APPROVED BY THE CITY OF RALEIGH WAKE COUNTY RIGHT-OF-WAY (TYP.) NORTH CAR AND SHALL BE SO INSTALLED UNLESS A CHANGE OLINA
~ oa 74~5oA G 838 NCEMACH N 83'03, 54 J w IS AUTHORIZED BY WRITTEN APPROVAL. PUBLIC
I SANITARY SEWER EASEMENTS ARE TO BE RECORDED
N/F KENNETH 8, LAW50N .lFt. I I / / DB 7831 PG 190 1 N/F CATHERINE M, KISER PRIOR TO FINAL ACCEPTANCE.
\ N/F CHARLES E. BUCHAN DB 7623 PG 9485 SIGNATURE; orowinq Sheet
~ ~ DB BJ51 PC 700 1, I / SUBDIVISION
~ ~ ~ I / ~ \ , CHIEF ENGINEER °ate PLAN
5.1 .01 DIR. OF PUBLIC UTILITIES
TRAFFIC ENGINEER scale II ~
1= CONSERVATION ENGINEER
0 50 100 150 2 0 0
Go
goo