20010825 Ver 1_COMPLETE FILE_20010604

07/ 4/04 11:55 FAX [phone] CARTER & BURGESS 14001/002
Carter==Burgess
FAX TRANSMITTAL
PROJECT: Wal-Mart FDC 6091 Expansion
TO: Bob Zarzecki, NCDENR
PROJECT NO: 292388
777 Main Street
Fort Worth, Texas 16102
P.O. Box 901058
Fort Worth, Texas 76101-2058
Phone: [phone]
Fac 817.222.6550
www.c-b.com
FAX: [phone]
FROM: Kylon M. Wilson DATE: 07/14/04
C&B Telephone Number [phone] C&B Fax Number: [phone]
Total number of pages transmitted, including this page 2
REMARKS: Bob per your request I am sending you a copy of the Telephone Conversation Report that
was sent to John Dorney. Please let me know if you have any questions.
PREVIOUSLY SCANNED DOCUMENTS:
Y 613355
SPECIAL INSTRUCTIONS:
Copy as Indicated below ? Copy as attached ? Return originals to Sender Mall Original to Address
cc: Correspondence
J:wel_Man FOCNC_H9nderwj 2Q3ftMwd Pruuwwk0fwt001wvFW91.d=
Carter & Burgess, Inc. Carter & Burgess Consultants, Inc. Nixon & Laird Architorts/Engineers, P.C. Nixon & Laird Architects/Enpineernn, Inc. C&B Nevada, Inc.
JUL-14-2004 WED 12:32 TEL:[phone] NAME:DWQ-WETLANDS P. 1
07/1-4/04 11:55 FAX [phone] CARTER & BURGESS 10002/002
1
777 Main Street
P.O. Box 901050
Cart®rmBurgess Fort Worth, Texas 76101 205£1
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
TELEPHONE REPORT
PROJECT: Wal-Mart FDC
North Carolina
FROM: Kylon Wilson
TO: John Domey
PHONE: [phone]
6091 Expansion - Henderson, PROJECT NO.: 292388
WITH: Carter & Burgess, Inc. DATE: 06/04/04
WITH: North Carolina Department of TIME: 10:15 a.m.
Environmental and Natural Resources
(NCDENR)
The following is our understanding of the subject matter covered in this conversation. if this differs from
your understanding, please notify us within (5) working days.
1. Carter & Burgess Inquired on the status of the review for the necessity of submitting a new Pre-
Construction Notification (PCN) for the expansion of the referenced facility. On May 7, 2004,
Carter & Burgess submitted the original Pre-Construction Notification (PCN), an overall site plan,
grading plan and storm drain plan for the expansion of the existing distribution center, along with a
letter stating that the construction plans had no additional Impacts to streams and/or wetlands.
2. John asked
Burf Carter & Burgess had received a has of received any requests or any?otfrom his office, to submit a new her corn spondence/commentsPCN).
Carter & Burgess ha
3. Since NCDENR has not sent a request for Carter & Burgess to submit a new PCN, John said that
NCDENR will not require additional permitting (submittal of a new PCN) for this project.
REPORTED BY: Kylon M. Wilson, P.E.
KMWRau
? uva?r:ocvac_wee,.m.?emae??wanoaesstWrmuv,PoCa+.eoc
cc: Correspondence
Randy Offlll
Ed Green
David Nortman
Wal-Ma
Tim Johnson, via EDMS
Joe Loethen, via EDMS
Carter & Burgess, Inc. Carter & Burgos Architects/Engineers, Inc. Carter & Burgess Consultants, Inc.
C&B Ardiitects/Engineers, Inc. C&B Architects/Engineers, P.C. C&B Nevada, Inc.
SCANNED
cAR-TER & BURGESS, INC.
JUN
JUL-14-2004 WED 12:32 TEL:[phone] NAME:DWO-WETLANDS P. 2
Wetlands Tracking 401S_
Facility Name Wal-Mart Distribution Center
Project Number Ol 0825
Project Type purpose of commercial
Vance
Location Martin Creek Henderson I County2
Received From APP
Received Date June 4, 2001
Sent to Region Date 6/7/2001
Rcvd Region Date
Last Action Date .JuIN 31, 2001
Last Action Issue General
Latitude (ddmmss) 371738
Longitude (ddmmss) 782300
Public Notice W
Certificates
Permit „ Cert # Wetland Wetland Score
Type Type Impact
f, f O ON COE ID # Region Raleigh
39 3287 HWF O Y ON
COE Susp Date Reg. Contact
DCM Susp Date I APPLICATION FEE INFO
TIP Number I Payment Date 6/4/2001
More Info Requested I Amount Paid $200.Oa
More Info Received I Payor David Nortman
Mitigation ? I Check # 3050
COC Received Date
Public Notice ( Comment Period
ReceivedDate Ends Date
?o
Stream Area
Area Length Lengtt
Stream Class Wetland (acres) (acres) (feet) (feet)
Index Prim. SupP Subbasin Class Req. Appr. Req. APPr.
?8-78-1-_31 C I NSW 030302 riparian 0.081 0.081
WRP Mitigation
Project Wetland Wetland Area Length Completion
Number Type Class (acres) (feet) Date Subbasin
Stream Impacts (ft.
Peren- Inter-
vial mittent
r?o
C
bw? C?
GNU N4
J? Express
Carter::Burgess
May 7, 2004
0
10 As
North Carolina Department of Environmental and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality, Wetlands/401 Unit
2321 Crabtree Boulevard, Suite 250
Raleigh, NC 27604-2260
//I Main S}rrrt
F() fi x 90105£1
I ?n I Wrn th, lixur, /6101 '7058
hrnu 8 1 / /35 6000
E??x s;v 777.s1?so
11 ? uni
RE: Wal-Mart Distribution Center 6091 - Vance County, Henderson, North Carolina
Pre-Construction Notification Application
Dear Mr. John Dorney:
Carter & Burgess, Inc. is expanding the existing distribution center referenced above to
include a dry goods warehouse and associated trailer and employee parking. The
original Pre-Construction Notification (PCN) is enclosed, which accounted for the
proposed expansion. The construction plans for the expansion do not have any
additional impacts to streams and or wetlands.
Please review the enclosed overall site plan, grading plan and storm drain plan to verify
that no additional permitting (submittal of a new PCN) is required. In addition, we are
submitting Erosion and Sedimentation Plans to Bill Denton as part of the Land
Disturbance Permit.
We appreciate your assistance in this matter. If you have any questions, or require
additional information, please contact me at 817.222.8737.
Sincerely,
CARTER & BURGESS, INC.
Kylon M. Wilson
Senior Project Manager
KMW/lau
Enclosure
BY: Federal Express Standard [phone]
J.\Wal Mart FDC\NC Henderson 292388\Word Processing\Ie1004swF6091.doc
cc: Correspondence Wal-Mart Stores East, Inc.
Randy Off ill Joe Loethen via EDMS
David Nortman Tim Johnson via EDMS
< tine, ?`C Rurrlo ... Inc ( nrler R Ituidas?, Aid hiteds/Engmecrs, In, (._nrtrr H, 1iul'je,, C nn u kuil>. Inc
( M Aic ?iih?r M1.?Fnginera> In( ( U Archit,,ds/E nclineui:, N ('W N-ml,, In,
C
Carter -.-Burgess
July 27, 2001
Department of Environmental and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality, Wetlands/ 401 Unit
2321 Crabtree Boulevard, Suite 250
Raleigh, NC 27604-2260
Attn John Dorney / Bob Zarzecki
RE Wetlands Application, Project Permits
Wal-Mart Distribution Center, Vance County, Henderson, NC
Dear Mr Dorney/ Mr Zarzecki
;001 N11Cid (1111
i,n'r• 'OQ
Fu1' W.)I.II Tnrci% '61 3; doO8
f hunt 817 222 3500
I u? 817 222 9550
ww N C " ^9111
Our field visit on Wednesday, July 25, 2001 with the ACOE, established one additional
area of jurisdictional wetlands, which will not be impacted by the development
Enclosed are revisions to the joint 404/401 Nationwide 39 permit application for the
proposed Wal-Mart Distribution Center to be located southeast of the intersection of
U S Hwy 1 and S R 1148, Henderson, Vance County, NC Again, the only impact
change from the original submittal is the elimination of the 97 linear feet of stream
channel disturbance As per our letter dated July 18, 2001, while we are pursuing the
404/401 permit we no longer require a minor variance for the stream and buffer The
stream and the associated buffer are being avoided with the proposed development by
use of retaining walls Included are the following items
1 Revised PCN Application form sheets 6, 9, and 10
2 Revised Exhibit Nos 1 and 2
3 Exhibit No 3 for the detailed Tar-Pamlico River Basin buffer zone
Please review the enclosed information and process for release of the 401 permit if
you have any questions, comments, or require any additional information, don't hesitate
to call me at [phone]
Sincerely,
CARTER & BURGESS, INC
Michael T Latz, P E
Associate
MTUlau
Enclosures
By FED EX 919-733-9726
R U0 812 90 20 1\WPVet0129w p91 doc
cc Correspondence Paul Kruckemeyer
Jim Emerson David Nortman
Randy Offill Terry Groom
q, 1 h I ry( _11.011,ud 1, t`11(vI L I 1, , L4U [I .'I , '
Steve Karras - via EDMS
III 1t 1 1\. a li 1 - t, rn I 'I, _.,F'),
Office Use Only: Form Version April 2001
USACE Action ID No. DWQ No.
If any particular item is not applicable to this project, please enter "Not Applicable" or "N/A" rather than
leaving the space blank.
I. Processing
1. Check all of the approval(s) requested for this project:
Section 404 Permit
? Section 10 Permit
401 Water Quality Certification
Riparian or Watershed Buffer Rules
2. Nationwide, Regional or General Permit Number(s) Requested: Nationwide 39
3. If this notification is solely a courtesy copy because written approval for the 401 Certification
is not required, check here: ?Not applicable
4. If payment into the North Carolina Wetlands Restoration Program (NCWRP) is proposed for
mitigation of impacts (see section VIII - Mitigation), check here: ? Not applicable
l
II. Applicant Information
1. Owner/Applicant Information
Name: Wal-Mart S or s East- Inc. - Steve Karras
Mailing Address: 2001 Southeast 10th Street
Bentonville, AR 72716-0550
Telephone Number: [phone] Fax Number: [phone]
E-mail Address: [e-mail]
--? 2. Agent Information (A signed and dated copy of the Agent Authorization letter must be
attached if the Agent has signatory authority for the owner/applicant.)
Name: Carter & Burgess, Inc. - Terry Groom
Company Affiliation: Consultant
Mailing Address: 3001 Meacham Boulevard, Suite 200
Fort Worth, Texas 76137
Telephone Number: [phone] Fax Number: [phone]
E-mail Address: [e-mail]
Page 3 of 12
? III. Project Information
I Attach a vicinity map clearly showing the location of the property with respect to local
landmarks such as towns, rivers, and roads. Also provide a detailed site plan showing property
boundaries and development plans in relation to surrounding properties. Both the vicinity map
and site plan must include a scale and north arrow. The specific footprints of all buildings,
impervious surfaces, or other facilities must be included. If possible, the maps and plans should
include the appropriate USGS Topographic Quad Map and NRCS Soil Survey with the property
boundaries outlined. Plan drawings, or other maps may be included at the applicant's discretion,
so long as the property is clearly defined. For administrative and distribution purposes, the
I USACE requires information to be submitted on sheets no larger than 11 by 17-inch format;
however, DWQ may accept paperwork of any size. DWQ prefers full-size construction
drawings rather than a sequential sheet version of the full-size plans. If full-size plans are
I reduced to a small scale such that the final version is illegible, the applicant will be informed that
the project has been placed on hold until decipherable maps are provided.
1. Name of project: Wal-Mart Distribution Center
2. T.I.P. Project Number (NCDOT Only): Not applicable
3. Property Identification Number (Tax PIN): 541-4-10n, 541-4-16, 222-4-1
4. Location
COUnty: Vance Nearest Town: Henderson
Subdivision name (include phase/lot number): Not applicable
I Directions to site (include road numbers, landmarks, etc.): Located at the southeastern
corner of the intersection of U.S. Route 1 bypass and S.R. 1148.
5. Site coordinates, if available (UTM or Lat/Long): 37° 17' 38" N / 78° 23' 00" w
(Note - If project is linear, such as a road or utility line, attach a sheet that separately lists the
coordinates for each crossing of a distinct waterbody.)
6. Describe the existing land use or condition of the site at the time of this application: The
eastern portion of the site consists of open grass land, the northern and western portions are
heavily wooded, and the southern portion is wooded with thick under brush.
7. Property size (acres)
132
8. Nearest body of water (stream/river/sound/ocean/lake):
Martin Creek
9. River Basin: Tar-Pamlico
(Note - this must be one of North Carolina's seventeen designated major river basins. The
River Basin map is available at http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/admin/maps/.)
I Page 4 of 12
10. Describe the purpose of the proposed work: To construct +/-300,000 S.F. cold storage
facility along with parking, utilities, and stormwater management facilities, including
grading for +/-475,000 S.F. expansion.
11. List the type of equipment to be used to construct the project: Heavy construction equipment
used in major earthwork projects.
12. Describe the land use in the vicinity of this project: Industrial and residential.
Our property is zoned industrial.
IV. Prior Project History
If jurisdictional determinations and/or permits have been requested and/or obtained for this
project (including all prior phases of the same subdivision) in the past, please explain. Include
the USACE Action ID Number, DWQ Project Number, application date, and date pennits and
certifications were issued or withdrawn. Provide photocopies of previously issued permits,
certifications or other useful information. Describe previously approved wetland, stream and
buffer impacts, along with associated mitigation (where applicable). If this is a NCDOT project,
list and describe permits issued for prior segments of the same T.I.P. project, along with
construction schedules.
Not applicable.
V. Future Project Plans
Are any additional permit requests anticipated for this project in the future? If so, describe the
anticipated work, and provide justification for the exclusion of this work from the current
application: No, this application includes areas designated for future expansion in the
design of the extended detention wetlands.
VI. Proposed Impacts to Waters of the United States/Waters of the State
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
wetlands, open water, and stream channels associated with the project. The applicant must also
provide justification for these impacts in Section VII below. All proposed impacts, permanent
and temporary, must be listed herein, and must be clearly identifiable on an accompanying site
plan. All wetlands and waters, and all streams (intermittent and perennial) must be shown on a
delineation map, whether or not impacts are proposed to these systems. Wetland and stream
evaluation and delineation forms should be included as appropriate. Photographs may be
included at the applicant's discretion. If this proposed impact is strictly for wetland or stream
mitigation, list and describe the impact in Section VIII below. If additional space is needed for
listing or description, please attach a separate sheet.
Page 5 of 12
I . Wetland Impacts
Wetland Impact
Site Number
(indicate on ma
Type of lmpact* Area of
Impact
(acres) Located within
100-year Floodplain**
es/no) Distance to
Nearest Stream
(linear feet)
Type of Wetland***
1 Fill 0.076 no 1150 forested wetland

' List each impact separately and identify temporary impacts. Impacts include, but are not limited to: mechanized clearing, grading, fill,
excavation, flooding, ditching/drainage, etc. For dams, separately list impacts due to both structure and flooding.
** 100-Year floodplains are identified through the Federal Emergency Management Agency's (FEMA) Flood Insurance Rate Maps
(FIRM), or FEMA-approved local floodplain maps. Maps are available through the FEMA Map Service Center at 1-800-358-9616, or
online at tty://www,fema. ov.
List a wetland type that best describes wetland to be impacted (e.g., freshwater/saltwater marsh, forested wetland, beaver pond,
Carolina Bay, bog, etc.)
List the total acreage (estimated) of existing wetlands on the property:
Total area of wetland impact proposed: 0.076
2. Stream Impacts, including all intermittent and perennial streams
Stream Impact
Site Number
indicate on ma
Type of Impact* Length of
Impact
linear feet
Stream Name** Average Width
of Stream
Before Impact Perennial or
Intermittent?
leasespecify)
1 Fill 97 I/T to Martin Creek 5' I

List each impact separately and identify temporary impacts. Impacts include, but are not limited to: culverts and associated rip-rap,
dams (separately list impacts due to both structure and flooding), relocation (include linear feet before and after, and net loss/gain),
stabilization activities (cement wall, rip-rap, crib wall, gabions, etc.), excavation, ditching/straightening, etc. If stream relocation is
proposed, plans and profiles showing the linear footprint for both the original and relocated streams must be included.
** Stream names can be found on USGS topographic maps. If a stream has no name, list as UT (unnamed tributary) to the nearest
downstream named stream into which it flows. USGS maps are available through the USGS at 1-800-358-9616, or online at
w-%vNv.uses,Ro_v. Several internet sites also allow direct download and printing of USGS maps (e.g., www.tol)ozone.com,
www.mapouest.com, etc.).
Cumulative impacts (linear distance in feet) to all streams on site: 97
0.076
Page 6 of 12
3. Open Water Impacts, including Lakes, Ponds, Estuaries, Sounds, Atlantic Ocean and anv
1
other Water of the U.S.
Open Water Impact
Site Number
(indicate on ma)
Type of Impact* Area of
Impact
(acres) Name of Waterbod
y
(if applicable) Type of Waterbody
(lake, pond, estuary, sound,
bay, ocean, etc.)

L bi cacn impact separately and toennry temporary impacts. impacts include, out are not limited to: till, excavation, dredging,
flooding, drainage, bulkheads, etc.
4. Pond Creation
If construction of a pond is proposed, associated wetland and stream impacts should be
included above in the wetland and stream impact sections. Also, the proposed pond should
be described here and illustrated on any maps incl ed with this application.
Pond to be created in (check all that apply): Y uplands ? stream ? wetlands
Describe the method of construction (e.g., dam/embankment, excavation, installation of
draw-down valve or spillway, etc.): Dam/embankment - extended detention wetland ponds -
see enclosed plan for locations.
Proposed use or purpose of pond (e.g., livestock watering, irrigation, aesthetic, trout pond,
local stormwater requirement, etc.): to meet stormwater requirements - extended
detention wetland basins
Size of watershed draining to pond: 116 AC.s Expected pond surface area: 14 AC.s
VII. Impact Justification (Avoidance and Minimization)
Specifically describe measures taken to avoid the proposed impacts. It may be useful to provide
information related to site constraints such as topography, building ordinances, accessibility, and
financial viability of the project. The applicant may attach drawings of alternative, lower-impact
site layouts, and explain why these design options were not feasible. Also discuss how impacts
were minimized once the desired site plan was developed. If applicable, discuss construction
techniques to be followed during construction to reduce impacts.
There were several factors that led to the site configuration. As follows: to the south of the
proposed site there is an existing cemetery and Martin Creek that bound the site; to the north
and northwest there are some existing residential properties that we were unable to obtain.
We have tried many layouts. The final layout we are submitting creates the least amount of
impact to layout we are submitting creates the least amount of impact to the wetlands and
still allows us to meet all of our site criteria.
Page 7 of 12
VIII. Mitigation
DWQ - In accordance with 15A NCAC 2H .0500, mitigation may be required by the NC
Division of Water Quality for projects involving greater than or equal to one acre of impacts to
freshwater wetlands or greater than or equal to 150 linear feet of total impacts to perennial
streams.
USACE - In accordance with the Final Notice of Issuance and Modification of Nationwide
Permits, published in the Federal Register on March 9, 2000, mitigation will be required when
necessary to ensure that adverse effects to the aquatic environment are minimal. Factors
including size and type of proposed impact and function and relative value of the impacted
aquatic resource will be considered in determining acceptability of appropriate and practicable
mitigation as proposed. Examples of mitigation that may be appropriate and practicable include,
but are not limited to: reducing the size of the project; establishing and maintaining wetland
and/or upland vegetated buffers to protect open waters such as streams; and replacing losses of
aquatic resource functions and values by creating, restoring, enhancing, or preserving similar
functions and values, preferable in the same watershed.
If mitigation is required for this project, a copy of the mitigation plan must be attached in order
for USACE or DWQ to consider the application complete for processing. Any application
lacking a required mitigation plan or NCWR.P concurrence shall be placed on hold as
incomplete. An applicant may also choose to review the current guidelines for stream restoration
in DWQ's Draft Technical Guide for Stream Work in North Carolina, available at
http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwellands/stn-ngide.html.
1. Provide a brief description of the proposed mitigation plan. The description should provide
as much information as possible, including, but not limited to: site location (attach directions
and/or map, if offsite), affected stream and river basin, type and amount (acreage/linear feet)
of mitigation proposed (restoration, enhancement, creation, or preservation), a plan view,
preservation mechanism (e.g., deed restrictions, conservation easement, etc.), and a
description of the current site conditions and proposed method of construction. Please attach
a separate sheet if more space is needed.
Not applicable
Page 8 of 12
2 Mitigation may also be made by payment into the North Carolina Wetlands Restoration
Program (NCWRP) with the NCWRP's written agreement Check the box indicating that
you would like to pay into the NCWRP Please note that payment into the NCWRP must be
reviewed and approved before it can be used to satisfy mitigation requirements Applicants
will be notified early in the review process by the 401/Wetlands Unit if payment into the
NCWRP is available as an option For additional information regarding the application
process for the NCWRP, check the NCWRP website at hqp //h2o_enr state ne us/wrphndex htm. If
use of the NCWRP is proposed, please check the appropriate box on page three and provide
the following information
Amount of stream mitigation requested (linear feet) Not applicable
Amount of buffer mitigation requested (square feet) Not applicable
Amount of Riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres) Not applicable
Amount of Non-npanan wetland mitigation requested (acres):__ Not applicable
Amount of Coastal wetland mitigation requested (acres) Not applicable
IX. Environmental Documentation (DWQ Only)
Does the project involve an expenditure of public funds or the use of public (federal/state/local)
land?
Yes ? No E Z/
If yes, does the project require preparation of an environmental document pursuant to the
requirements of the National or North Carolina Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
Note If you are not sure whether a NEPA/SEPA document is required, call the SEPA
coordinator at [phone] to review current thresholds for environmental documentation.
Yes ? No ?
If yes, has the document review been finalized by the State Clearinghouse? If so, please attach a
copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval letter
Yes ? No ?
X. Proposed Impacts on Riparian and Watershed Buffers (DWQ Only)
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
required state and local buffers associated with the project The applicant must also provide
justification for these impacts in Section VII above All proposed impacts must be listed herein,
and must be clearly identifiable on the accompanying site plan All buffers must be shown on a
map, whether or not impacts are proposed to the buffers Correspondence from the DWQ
Regional Office may be included as appropriate Photographs may also be included at the
applicant's discretion
Will the project impact protected riparian buffers identified within 15A NCAC 2B 0233
(Meuse), 15A NCAC 2B 0259 (Tar-Pamlico), 15A NCAC 2B 0250 (Randleman Rules and
Water Supply Buffer Require ents), or other (please identify )?
Yes ? No [r If you answered "yes", provide the following information
Page 9 of ! '
Identify the square feet and acreage of impact to each zone of the riparian buffers. If buffer
mitigation is required calculate the required amount of mitigation by applying the buffer
multipliers.
Zone" Impact
(s uare feet) Multiplier Required
ation
1 26,660 3 79,980 S.F.
2 16,117 1.5 24,176 S.F.
Total 42,777 104,155.5 S.
Zone I extends out 30 feet perpendicular from near bank of channel; Zone 2 extends an
additional 20 feet from the edge of Zone 1.
If buffer mitigation is required, please discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (i.e., Donation
of Property, Conservation Easement, Riparian Buffer Restoration / Enhancement, Preservation or
Payment into the Riparian Buffer Restoration Fund). Please attach all appropriate information as
identified within 15A NCAC 2B .0242 or .0260.
Please see minor variance request form.
X1. Stormwater (DWQ Only)
Describe impervious acreage (both existing and proposed) versus total acreage on the site.
Discuss stormwater controls proposed in order to protect surface waters and wetlands
downstream from the property.
Total acreage of site is equal to 132 AC.S. Existing impervious is 2.27 acres. Proposed
impervious is equal to 66.34 AC.S. We will construct extended detention wetlands in order to
protect downstream surface waters and wetlands.
X11. Sewage Disposal (DWQ Only)
Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of
wastewater generated from the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
On-site sewer will tie into the public sewer system and will be treated at the local
wastewater treatment plant.
XIII. Violations (DWQ Only)
Is this site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500) or any Buffer Rules?
Yes ? No Ea'
Is this an after-the-fact permit application?
Yes ? No ['
Page 10 of 12
XIV. Other Circumstances (Optional):
It is the applicant's responsibility to submit the application sufficiently in advance of desired
construction dates to allow processing time for these permits. However, an applicant may
choose to list constraints associated with construction or sequencing that may impose limits on
work schedules (e.g., draw-down schedules for lakes, dates associated with Endangered and
Threatened Species, accessibility problems, or other issues outside of the applicant's control).
Not applicable
s/
Applicant/Afei is Sign Date
(Agent's signature is vali only if an authorization letter from the applicant is provided.)
US Army Corps Of Engineers Field Offices and County Coverage
Asheville Regulatory Field Office Alexander Cherokee Iredell Mitchell
`. US Army Corps of Engineers Avery Clay Jackson Polk
151 Patton Avenue Buncombe Cleveland Lincoln Rowan
Room 208 Burke Gaston Macon Rutherford
Asheville, NC 28801-5006 Cabarrus Graham Madison Stanley
Telephone: [phone] Caldwell Haywood McDowell Swain
Fax: [phone] Catawba Henderson Mecklenburg Transylvania
Raleigh Regulatory Field Office Alamance Durham Johnston Rockingham
US Army Corps Of Engineers Alleghany Edgecombe Lee Stokes
6508 Falls of the Neuse Road Ashe Franklin Nash Surry
Suite 120 Caswell Forsyth Northampton Vance
Raleigh, NC 27615 Chatham Granville _Orange Wake
Telephone: [phone] Davidson Guilford Person Warren
Fax: [phone] Davie Halifax Randolph Wilkes
Washington Regulatory Field Office Beaufort Currituck Jones
US Army Corps Of Engineers Bertie Dare Lenoir
Post Office Box 1000 Camden Gates Martin
Washington, NC 27889-1000 Carteret* Green Pamlico
Telephone: [phone] Chowan Hertford Pasquotank
Fax: [phone] Craven Hyde Perquimans
Wilmington Regulatory Field Office Anson Duplin Onslow
US Army Corps Of Engineers Bladen Harnett Pender
Post Office Box 1890 Brunswick Hoke Richmond
Wilmington, NC 28402-1890 Carteret Montgomery Robeson
Telephone: [phone] Columbus Moore Sampson
Fax: [phone] Cumberland New Hanover Scotland
Page 11 of 12
Pitt
Tyrrell
Washington
Wayne
Union
Watauga
Yancey
Wilson
Yadkin
*Croatan National Forest Only
r
I ,i \ / .I i I I 1 I 1\ II
. ` r.,' T „? . 7,
rl' t
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
AL J_ L
'WETLANDS A T
I -r I 1'0. 076 ACRES\ .I? .
.4.a. ; .?:i?. i ! ? • ;!` ` X111 I \\\,..,
I
IV _ I
I / ` 1
\I
\, I I , ? Il`I ? I I
, \
?,.
1 \ ?_ 1

? 4
d
\Ca
(
r.

I T'
I \
1 ,
TAR-PAML I C4 R I VERBASIN
50' BUFFER ZONE
6O1_ J? ? ?? r 'll 1 +?'
? ?? ('?? ' ?'?,. / WETLAND B
? 0.243 ACRES
REFER TO EXHIBIT N03 FOR MORE DETAIL ON BUFFER ZONE
ITLE: WETLANDS EXHIBIT NO 1 (REVISED) DATE:5/25/01 (07/26/01) SCALE: NTS
PROPOSED CONDITIONS
0- Carter Burgess
Conwuonr. ?,. a.nn?n? l.gi,..?ny AnCbMOW.
_onu ? oK- r e,oa.n+.nl ?n? Lund ?.r r.?
PDC
HENDERSON NC
\ A
Rte!

1/ c, t:, \
4I I A b ,

REF, DWG. NO.
SUPPLEMENTAL DWG. NO
CB
C-1
I , i\ `I I 1 I
?. ? I 1 I ,\ ?'\ \ ?I I 1 1 1 1 ?
, I I \ ` 1 I 1 ' I \
` , I I I ? ? 1 1 1 '\ \ , \
` 1 1
_ WETLANDS A
0.076 ACRES \? 1 1 1 \
/ I 1
\ . \ 1 I 1 , \ ` \ 1 \ \ \ n
1 TAR-PAMLICO RIVER BASIN
50 BUFFER ZONE
\ \ I , `1 1 1 I 1 r, , ' 1 1 . 1 \I ? 1? 1\ \ \
17
/
46 , J
I ,
'WETLAND 8
N f?? ???'?? // 0.243 ACRES
` REFER TO EXIHIBIT N03 FOR MORE DETAIL ON BUFFER ZONE
TITLE: WETLANDS EXHIBIT NO 2 (REVISED) DATE: 5/25/01 (7/26/01) SCALEi NTS
EXISTING CONDITIONS -
Carter r Burgeacs
Lon,?ha m, .n Plonninp Ena? .chn.c.u•-
=on.? ?n •r anoo•man onC eP.laiee Se• ?..
PDC
HENDERSON NC
REF, DWG. NO. CB ;
SUPPLEMENTAL DWG. NO, C-2
i 1
\
} I
I
} I -
1 '
`\ I
\I
77 ? \ \
1
I
I
I\
? r f
1 , ? 1
r \
I
\ I
?? I 1
- I 1
- I '
0 1
6 / i- I I I
I r Ire /? /??? - ?? S?GMENTAL, I`
II j1 _ _ ,? / II ?N\RETAI N I NG WALL
"RE: 21 C
I II I'1 1 // I I ` I
I 1
L'? , ? 1 1 1 1 I I I I? \ ?
MEND OF \\\
11 \STREAM
, r 1 I 1 ,
? 1} 1 I I
1 I \ rll 1
? 1 II I II \ ? ' ? \I \ .
Ln
?1 I I ,
I I
'50; BUFFER?\ ZbNE 2
?ZONE I ?\ ti N 1 OI I \
ov o,
rl.
I
t
I
I
1
i\
' 1?1 / l / 1 1' I r l I I I I
rr I l I
?I Iwt I I I ,I ( I
\ ; IujI 1 ,'I I Qo 50',BUFFERt
I co ?ONE
I 1
r \
I I I ? I \ I -- 1 \
o? ? I I ,`?? I I I
t ?I 1, I I ?? I \\1 I ,
i
TITLE: WETLANDS EXHIBIT *3 DATE : 07/26/01 SCALE: NTS
PROPOSED CONDITIONS
PDC #6091 REF. DWG. NO. C3.14
Carter u Burgess
......... H E N D E R S O Nf NC
SUPPLEMENTAL
DWG. No. r_-l
O?O? NN AT FgpG
O `C
Michael F. Easley
Governor
William G. Ross, Jr., Secretary
Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Kerr T. Stevens
Division of Water Quality
July 31, 2001
DWQ Project No. 01-0825
Vance County
Page 1 of 2
Wal-Mart Stores East, Inc.
c/o Mr. Steve Karras
2001 Southeast 10'' Street
Bentonville, AR 72716-0550
Fax [phone]
cc: Carter & Burgess, Inc.
attn: Mr. Terry Groom
3001 Meacham Boulevard, Suite 200
Fort Worth, TX 76137
Fax[phone]
Re: Wal-Mart Distribution Center, southeastern corner of the intersection of US Route 1 bypass and SRI 148,
Henderson, Vance County, NC
Tax PIN 5414-10A, 541-4-16,222-4-1
Unnamed tributary streams to Martin Creek, Tar River [03-03-02, 28-78-1-3; C NSW]
APPROVAL of 401 Water Quality Certification and compliance determination per the Tar-Painlico'Rivei '
Buffer Protection Rules (15A NCAC 213 .0259) with ADDITIONAL CONDITIONS
Dear Sirs,
You have our approval, in accordance with the attached conditions, to impact 0.076 acres of wetlands for the
purpose of constructing the proposed development, as described within your revised application and site plan dated
July 27, 2001. After reviewing your application, we have decided that this fill is covered by General Water Quality
Certification Number 3287. This Certification allows you to use Nationwide Permit Number 39 when issued by the
US Army Corps of Engineers (USACE). In addition, you should get any other required federal, state or local permits
before you go ahead with your project including (but not limited to) Sediment and Erosion Control. Also, this approval
will expire when the accompanying 404 permit expires unless otherwise specified in the General Certification.
This approval is only valid for the purpose and design that you described in your revised application dated
7/27/01 and "Wetlands Exhibit No. 1 (Revised) Proposed Conditions" dated 5/25/01(07/26/01). If you change your
project, you must notify us and you may be required to send us a new application. If the property is sold, the new
owner must be given a copy of this Certification and approval letter and is thereby responsible for complying with all
conditions. If total fills for this project (now or in the future) exceed one acre of wetland, compensatory mitigation
may be required as described in 15A NCAC 2H .0506 (h). For this approval to be valid, you must follow the
conditions listed in the attached certification and any additional conditions listed below.
1. An additional condition is that all stormwater shall be directed as diffuse flow at non-erosive velocities through the
protected stream buffers and will not re-concentrate before discharging into the stream as identified within 15A
NCAC 213 .0259(5) except as identified within the DWQ approved stormwater management plan.
401 WETLANDS CERTIFICATION UNIT
North Carolina Division of Water Quality, Department of Environment and Natural Resources
2321 Crabtree Blvd., Raleigh, NC 27604-2260 (Location)
1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1650 (Mailing Address)
919-733-1786 (phone), 919-733-6893 (fax), http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands
Hage 2 of 2
2. A final, written stormwater management plan shall be approved in writing by this Office before the impacts
specified in this Certification occur. The stormwater management plan must include plans and specifications for
stormwater management facilities designed to remove 85% TSS according to the most recent version of the NC
DENR Stormwater Best Management Practices Manual. The stormwater management plan must include the
proposed extended detention wetland to remove nitrogen as required under this Certification. These facilities must
be designed to treat the runoff from the entire project, unless otherwise explicitly approved by the Division of Water
Quality (DWQ). Also, before any permanent building is occupied at the subject site, the facilities (as approved by
this Office) shall be constructed and operational, and the stormwater management plan (as approved by this Office)
shall be implemented. The structural stormwater practices as approved by this Office as well as drainage patterns
must be maintained in perpetuity. No changes to the structural stormwater practices shall be made without written
authorization from the Division of Water Quality. Please contact Mr. Todd St.John of this Office at 919-733-9584
regarding this condition.
3. The outside boundary of the protected buffer shall be clearly marked with orange fabric fencing prior to any land
disturbing activities to ensure compliance with 15A NCAC 2B .0233 and this Certification.
4. No impacts shall occur to the protected buffers except for activities classified as "exempt" within 15A NCAC 2B
.0259(6) without prior approval from the DWQ.
5. Upon completion of all work approved within this Certification, and any subsequent modifications, the applicant is
required to return the attached certificate of completion to the 401/Wetlands Unit, North Carolina Division of Water
Quality, 1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC, 27699-1650.
If you do not accept any of the conditions of this certification, you may ask for an adjudicatory hearing. You
must act within 60 days of the date that you receive this letter. To ask for a hearing, send a written petition, which
conforms to Chapter 150B of the North Carolina General Statutes to the Office of Administrative Hearings, P.O. Box
27447, Raleigh, N.C. 276 1 1-7447. This certification and its conditions are final and binding unless you ask for a
hearing.
This letter completes the review of the Division of Water Quality under Section 401 of the Clean Water Act. If
you have any questions, please telephone John Domey at 919-733-9646 or Bob Zarzecki at 919-73379726.
Sincerely,
Steven
C WQ, Director
Cc: Todd Tugwell, US Army Corps of Engineers Raleigh Regulatory Field Office
Steve Mitchell, DWQ Raleigh Regional Office
Todd St. John, DWQ 401 Unit
File Copy
Central Files
DWQ 010825
f
0F W A TF TP
e-
Michael F. Easley
G Governor
Y
Cl)
] William G. Ross,Jr.Secretary
O .? Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Kerr T. Stevens
Division of Water Quality
Division of Water Quality
Department of Environmental and Natural Resources
. Wetlands/401 Unit
Location: 2321 Crabtree Boulevard, Suite 250 Raleigh, NC 27604-2260
Mailing Address: 1650 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC 27699-1650
Contact Information: General 919-733-1786 Fax: [phone]
Fax To: -k, ke. LcJ L Fax Number: E)'I3 -zzz-?ssa
Company: 2zs(L Date: 3 o i
From: Phone: e-, 31" 1
No. Of Pages including cover sheet:
Notes or special instructions:

C' GD
11
*
A
NCDERR-
Division of Water Quality
Wetlands/401 Unit: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
2321 Crabtree Blvd, Ste 250 Raleigh, NC 27604-2260
jPage 2 of 2
2. A final, written stormwater management plan shall be approved in writing by this Office before the impacts
specified in this Certification occur. The stormwater management plan must include plans and specifications for
stormwater management facilities designed to remove 85% TSS according to the most recent version of the NC
DENR Stormwater Best Management Practices Manual. The stormwater management plan must include the
proposed extended detention wetland to remove nitrogen as required under this Certification. These facilities must
be designed to treat the runoff from the entire project, unless otherwise explicitly approved by the Division of Water
Quality (DWQ). Also, before any permanent building is occupied at the subject site, the facilities (as approved by
this Office) shall be constructed and operational, and the stormwater management plan (as approved by this Office)
shall be implemented. The structural stormwater practices as approved by this Office as well as drainage patterns
must be maintained in perpetuity. No changes to the structural stormwater practices shall be made without written
authorization from the Division of Water Quality. Please contact Mr. Todd St.John of this Office at 919-733-9584
regarding this condition.
3. The outside boundary of the protected buffer shall be clearly marked with orange fabric fencing prior to any land
disturbing activities to ensure compliance with 15A NCAC 2B .0233 and this Certification.
4. No impacts shall occur to the protected buffers except for activities classified as "exempt" within 15A NCAC 2B
.0259(6) without prior approval from the DWQ.
5. Upon completion of all work approved within this Certification, and any subsequent modifications, the applicant is
required to return the attached certificate of completion to the 401/Wetlands Unit, North Carolina Division of Water
Quality, 1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC, 27699-1650.
If you do not accept any of the conditions of this certification, you may ask for an adjudicatory hearing. You
must act within 60 days of the date that you receive this letter. To ask for a hearing, send a written petition, which
conforms to Chapter 150B of the North Carolina General Statutes to the Office of Administrative Hearings, P.O. Box
27447, Raleigh, N.C. 276 1 1-7447. This certification and its conditions are final and binding unless you ask for a
hearing.
This letter completes the review of the Division of Water Quality under Section 401 of the Clean Water Act. If
you have any questions, please telephone John Domey at 919-733-9646 or Bob Zarzecki at 919-73379726.
Sincerely,
P'Lo,
. Sn
WQ, Director
Cc: Todd Tugwell, US Army Corps of Engineers Raleigh Regulatory Field Office
Steve Mitchell, DWQ Raleigh Regional Office
Todd St. John, DWQ 401 Unit .
File Copy
Central Files ,. .
DWQ 010825
tll 1?4 -
v? Tat,-)
9LOL-££L (6W GUO b091Z N 46ialem - tings!!eS 'N U9
Qs - pin /4)
?o ?/'2
• Cl-, ?-?1 s? oq 5
%cl
t .
Carter-Burgess
July 27, 2001
Department of Environmental and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality, Wetlands/ 401 Unit
2321 Crabtree Boulevard, Suite 250
Raleigh, NC 27604-2260
Attn: John Dorney / Bob Zarzecki
10OI M"'I,lui
J,,i, WOf Ili. I(,xm, /6I ?ti nr,ust
I'Ivm,, l31; _722.8500
I nr tt I / i72Ei550
w,vw.( I,.,,an

?0
RE: Wetlands Application, Project Permits
Wal-Mart Distrib n Center, Vance County, Henderson, NC
Dear Mr. Dorne / Mr. Zar cki:
Our field visit on nesday, July 25, 2001 with the ACOE, established one additional
area of jurisdictional wetlands, which will not be impacted by the development.
Enclosed are revisions to the joint 404/401 Nationwide 39 permit application for the
proposed Wal-Mart Distribution Center to be located southeast of the intersection of
U.S. Hwy 1 and S.R. 1148, Henderson, Vance County, NC. Again, the only impact
change from the original submittal is the elimination of the 97 linear feet of stream
channel disturbance. As per our letter dated July 18, 2001, while we are pursuing the
404/401 permit we no longer require a minor variance for the stream and buffer. The
stream and the associated buffer are being avoided with the proposed development by
use of retaining walls. Included are the following items:
1. Revised PCN Application form sheets 6, 9, and 10.
2. Revised Exhibit Nos. 1 and 2.
3. Exhibit No. 3 for the detailed Tar-Pamlico River Basin buffer zone.
? nilri ,`? Iini(It•?,?., In,
Please review the enclosed information and process for release of the 401 permit. If
you have any questions, comments, or require any additional information, don't hesitate
to call me at [phone].
Sincerely,
CARTER & BURGESS, INC.
Michael T. Latz, P.E.
Associate
MTUlau
Enclosures
By FED EX: 919-733-9726
R:\JOB\290201 \W P\letOl 2sw. p9l .doc
cc: Correspondence Paul Kruckemeyer Steve Karras - via EDMS
Jim Emerson David Nortman
Randy Offill Terry Groom
wl(i X Ruirp"., ( (,(, ''It(nil hl, [ 11? l ". I.III d AI, III[,- II ii Jill ('I 'C Hi,(,i, I,m,I AI, hill I1"V,I(I(i. n(
1. Wetland Impacts
Wetland Impact
Site Number
(indicate on ma
Type of Impact* Area of
Impact
(acres) Located within
100-year Floodplain**
es/no Distance to
Nearest Stream
(linear feet
Type of Wetland***
1 Fill 0.076 no 1150 forested wetland

* List each impact separately and identify temporary impacts. Impacts include, but are not limited to: mechanized clearing, grading, fill,
excavation, flooding, ditching/drainage, etc. For dams, separately list impacts due to both structure and flooding.
** 100-Year floodplains are identified through the Federal Emergency Management Agency's (FEMA) Flood Insurance Rate Maps
(FIRM), or FEMA-approved local floodplain maps. Maps are available through the FEMA Map Service Center at 1-800-358-9616, or
online at http://www,fema.gov.
List a wetland type that best describes wetland to be impacted (e.g., freshwater/saltwater marsh, forested wetland, beaver pond,
Carolina Bay, bog, etc.)
List the total acreage (estimated) of existing wetlands on the property:
Total area of wetland impact proposed: 0.076
2. Stream Impacts, including all intermittent and perennial streams
Stream Impact
Site Number
indicate on ma
Type of Impact* Length of
Impact
linear feet
Stream Name** Average Width
of Stream
Before Impact Perennial or
Intermittent?
leasespecify)

* List each impact separately and identify temporary impacts. Impacts include, but are not limited to: culverts and associated rip-rap,
dams (separately list impacts due to both structure and flooding), relocation (include linear feet before and after, and net loss/gain),
stabilization activities (cement wall, rip-rap, crib wall, gabions, etc.), excavation, ditching/straightening, etc. If stream relocation is
proposed, plans and profiles showing the linear footprint for both the original and relocated streams must be included.
** Stream names can be found on USGS topographic maps. If a stream has no name, list as UT (unnamed tributary) to the nearest
downstream named stream into which it flows. USGS maps are available through the USGS at 1-800-358-9616, or online at
www.uses.eov. Several internet sites also allow direct download and printing of USGS maps (e.g., www.toi)ozone.com,
www.mayguest.com, etc.).
Cumulative impacts (linear distance in feet) to all streams on site:
0.076
Page 6 of 12
2. Mitigation may also be made by payment into the North Carolina Wetlands Restoration
Program (NCWRP) with the NCWRP's written agreement. Check the box indicating that
you would like to pay into the NCWRP. Please note that payment into the NCWRP must be
reviewed and approved before it can be used to satisfy mitigation requirements. Applicants
will be notified early in the review process by the 401/Wetlands Unit if payment into the
NCWRP is available as an option. For additional information regarding the application
process for the NCWRP, check the NCWRP website at hqp://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/M/index.htm. If
use of the NCWRP is proposed, please check the appropriate box on page three and provide
the following information:
Amount of stream mitigation requested (linear feet): Not applicable
Amount of buffer mitigation requested (square feet): Not applicable
Amount of Riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres): Not applicable
Amount of Non-riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres): Not applicable
Amount of Coastal wetland mitigation requested (acres): Not applicable
IX. Environmental Documentation (DWQ Only)
Does the project involve an expenditure of public funds or the use of public (federal/state/local)
land?
Yes ? No [??
If yes, does the project require preparation of an environmental document pursuant to the
requirements of the National or North Carolina Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
Note: If you are not sure whether a NEPA/SEPA document is required, call the SEPA
coordinator at [phone] to review current thresholds for environmental documentation.
Yes ? No ?
If yes, has the document review been finalized by the State Clearinghouse? If so, please attach a
copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval letter.
Yes ? No ?
X. Proposed Impacts on Riparian and Watershed Buffers (DWQ Only)
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
required state and local buffers associated with the project. The applicant must also provide
justification for these impacts in Section VII above. All proposed impacts must be listed herein,
and must be clearly identifiable on the accompanying site plan. All buffers must be shown on a
map, whether or not impacts are proposed to the buffers. Correspondence from the DWQ
Regional Office may be included as appropriate. Photographs may also be included at the
applicant's discretion.
Will the project impact protected riparian buffers identified within 15A NCAC 2B .0233
(Meuse), 15A NCAC 213 .0259 (Tar-Pamlico), 15A NCAC 213 .0250 (Randleman Rules and
Water Supply Buffer Require ents), or other (please identify )?
Yes ? No If you answered "yes", provide the following information:
Page 9 of 1
Identify the square feet and acreage of impact to each zone of the riparian buffers. If buffer
mitigation is required calculate the required amount of mitigation by applying the buffer
multipliers.
Zone* Impact
(square feet) Multiplier Required
Mitigation

Total
* Zone 1 extends out 30 feet perpendicular from near bank of channel; Gone 2 extends an
additional 20 feet from the edge of Zone 1.
If buffer mitigation is required, please discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (i.e., Donation
of Property, Conservation Easement, Riparian Buffer Restoration / Enhancement, Preservation or
Payment into the Riparian Buffer Restoration Fund). Please attach all appropriate information as
identified within 15A NCAC 213.0242 or.0260.
X1. Stormwater (DWQ Only)
Describe impervious acreage (both existing and proposed) versus total acreage on the site.
Discuss stormwater controls proposed in order to protect surface waters and wetlands
downstream from the property.
Total acreage of site is equal to 132 AC.S. Existing impervious is 2.27 acres. Proposed
impervious is equal to 66.34 AC.S. We will construct extended detention wetlands in order to
protect downstream surface waters and wetlands.
XII. Sewage Disposal (DWQ Only)
Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of
wastewater generated from the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
On-site sewer will tie into the public sewer system and will be treated at the local
wastewater treatment plant.
XII1. Violations (DWQ Only)
Is this site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500) or any Buffer Rules?
Yes ? No [?]?
Is this an after-the-fact permit application?
Yes ? No [2'
Page 10 of 1

I \` I •
? / II ? ? I' `I ? \\ I I \?. a b as ba bb a a \ \\
. /
- i- - - -
- ,
-
i,
?; T T T , \ \ \
, \ \ \

-
? - A pl i p Co.
T ? W

i ,
ETLANDS
AA
'
I''f•?
I (' 0.076 ACRES I a ?a I
= ==
== a
I
I I ? ? I
I I \
`
'- I I I I I
_ \
a
a
b -
I ? 1 I

/ !
-t l
1 I

\ \ , I I ? ? i? I I I \ \ -

\ \
1 I \
I I \ ` `

-Ai
I
r
\
\ \
1 \ 1 1 ?

1
I
II
,,
I
_ _ _
I \ 1 -'1\ /1 I
\
,
I 11 1 I \ 1 ?
\ _
`
oil
- - it

I®L \ '? ' I?
' II I TAR-PAML I CO R I VER• BAS I N
50' BUFFER ZONE

RIM
pj.
-1 WETLAND 8
4
0.243 ACRES

/ REFER TO EXIHIBIT NO.3 FOR MORE DETAIL ON BUFFER ZONE
JLE: WETLANDS EXHIBIT NO. 1 (REVISED) DATE:5/25/01 (07/26/01) SCALE: N.T.S.
PROPOSED CONDITIONS

REF. DWG. NO. CB:
Carter u- Burgess P D C f- -
Ca whuoEa in Planning, Engln,H g, Arthil.Ce.

_?nsi_nicr .unoaemen?n.l k•In•. ri 5=rr? HENDERSON, NC
ISUPPLEMENTAL DWG. NO.
C-1
I
•/ I I I l 1 \ \ ` \ I \
• \ I 1 'I II t\ \ \ I \
I I I I \? _ \ \ ' \
' ?' I I I I I\' ? ? ` \ ?\ - I ? 1 l \
' ? I ? ` \I I 1 I 1
1 /
/ , ` ` `\ I , I r I
I ? I
\ 1 I I \ \
I I I \ I \ '? \ \ \ \
\ I I 1 I I \ \ \
\\ ?`
\ \\ WETLANDS
I A-
0.076 ACRES A
I I \ \
\ \ \ 1 1 II ` \ . \ 0.
TAR-PAMLICO RIVER BASIN
\ \ \ \ I I? 50 BUFFER ZONE
too
`?J
I \ I I i ' 40
\ ? 1 I I II I ? f'i?M , \ ` ? ? \ ?\
I j ,I 1, 0 \
I
\ ` 1 4 1 I i , I ? I , `\ \' I \` \\\
i
i '
?; %; rl;? • 1? /WETLAND B
D? ' ?\0.243 ACRES
. ' f 7 -1
,# 4,;oe ,
REFER TO EXIHIBIT NO.3 FOR MORE DETAIL ON BUFFER ZONE
'1TLE:
WETLANDS EXHIBIT NO. 2 (REVISED)
EXISTING CONDITIONS
Carter a Burgess F ['
P?-imq E yln .; h;,..,r. HENDERSON, NC
DATE: 5/25/01 (7/26/01) SCALE: N.T.S.
REF. DWG. NO. CB
SUPPLEMENTAL DWG. NO. C-2
1 '
,
q 73
I
1 I
? I
I
11 16 %
I
I `
I
I \

1
1
I
I
I
I /

i
I
? z '
1 I \

I
I
?\111 `\'
I?
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
`I
I
I \
I u? ?
?I II

S?GMENTAt,`
II _ _ _ ?? II \\RETA4 N I NG WALL
IE:'12/C10. 01 `
,
I
-L j I I I END OF
_ ' ' I I II ,STREAM
Ln o I I , , l ,
" Q0 ?D I I I 1 \ ,
20 ZbNE 2
- '50` BUFF ER?\ \
N .I ? I
°l ZONE I \ ' ti \
I I \I
`'-' Y I . I . I I '? II
?I I m l
C 50'',BUFFER
w I ZONE
I m' I I I I I , ,
I I ? I I I 1 ,
I I ? I I ? \
TITLE : WETLANDS EXHIBIT *3 DATE 07/26/01
PROPOSED CONDITIONS
REF. DWG. NO. C3.14
1
SCALE: NTS
Carter n Burgess P D C* 6 0 91 I
In Pl--, Archpe?-, H E N D E R S O N, NC SUPPLEMENTAL DWG. NO. C-3
?onstroC, o Monope M, onde Related 5-.-
Re: Wal-Mart Distribution Site Vmicc Co
Subject: Re: Wal-Mart Distribution Site Vance Co.
Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2001 19:55:45 -0400
From: John Dorney <[e-mail]>
To: Bob Zarzecki <bob.zarzeckiC?ncmail.net>
CC: Cyndi Karoly <[e-mail]>
agree. please give me the folder so i can begin to draft the letter. will need to
mention what they said. please jot down who said what and when. thankx
Bob Zarzecki wrote:
> John and Cyndi,
> Also, we need to send them an on hold letter. Their application was received on
> 6-4-01. They stated to me that there was no need for the on-hold letter because
> they would have there revised PCN sent to us ASAP. I recommend that if we don't
> get something by Friday, we send out an on-hold letter.
> - Bob
> Bob Zarzecki wrote,:
> > John,
> > They are still moving forward with their NW39 request. Apparently, they are
> > meeting with the USAGE to review some potential isolated wetlands. Depending
> > on the isolated wetlands, they plan to submit a revised PCN for NW39 for out
> > approval. I gave them the low-down on the the isolated wetland issues, so I
> > believe they will be sending in the PCN for at least some jurisdictional
> > wetland impact and request the isolated wetlands at the same time. They have
> > avoided all impacts to buffers. We are currently waiting on them.
> > - Bob
> > John Dorney wrote:
> > > please see me as soon as you can. the dept. of commerce is calling and i
> > > will need an update from you before i call them. thankx
> > > Bob Zarzecki wrote:
> > > > John and Steve,
> > > > I received a letter and construction plan for the Wal-Mart distribution
> > > > site in Vance Co. They have withdrawn their Minor Variance request.
> > > > However, its still unclear as to whether they have withdrawn their NW39
> > > > request. I left a message with them this morning. They sent in their
> > > > PCN on 614101. We need to send them a letter before the 60 days. I'll
> > > > right the correspondence or approval letter to them as soon as I find
> > > > out what they want. They are currently proposing 97 feet of stream
> > > > (this may be a feature not subject to the buffer rules; jurisdictional
> > > > ephemeral channel or wetland, however they did not request any wetland
> > > > impact). The NW39 is currently triggering their proposed Extended
> > > > Detention Wetlands. Cyndi, Please make sure that I'm copied on any
> > > > tracking or tardy notices for this project. Thanks,
> > > > - Bob
I of 1 7/24/01 6:45 AN/
kc. Wal-Mart Disirihution Sitc Vamcc ('O -
Subject: Re: Wal-Mart Distribution Site Vance Co.
Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2001 17:13:45 -0400
From: Bob"Zarzecki <bob.zarzecki(Q)ncmail.net>
Organization: Division of Water Quality; 401 Certification Unit
To: John Dorney <john.dorney(a)ncmal1.net>, Cyndi Karoly <cyncii.karoly(?)ncmail.net>
John and Cyndi,
Also, we need to s(-nd them an on hold tetter. Their application was received on
6-4--01. They stated to me that there was no need for the on-hold letter because
they would have there revised PCN sent to us ASAP. I recommend that it we don't
get something by Friday, we send out an on-hold letter.
- Bob
Bob Zarzecki wrote:
> John,
> They ar e still moving forward with their NW39 request. Apparently, they are
> meeting
h with the USACE to review so
tl
d
th
l
i
l
t
d me potential isolated wetlands. Depending
to submit a revised PCN for NW39 for out
Z?
> e
on t an
we
an
s,
ey p
so
a
e V
> approva l. I gave them the low-down on the the isolated wetland issues, so I C
>
> believe
wetland they will be sending in the
uest the isol
act and re
im PCN for at least some jurisdictional
They have
ated wetlands at the same time
C
> avoided q
p
all impacts to buffers. We .
are currently waiting on them. J
> - Bob
> r"._6Q, "."e
> John Dorney wrote:
>
> > please see me as soon as you can. the dept. of commerce is calling and i
> > will need an update from you before i call them. thankx
> > Bob Zarzecki wrote:
> > > John and Steve
tie
/17
`t
> > > I received a letter and construction plan for the Wal-Mart distribution
> > > site in Vance Co. They have withdrawn their Minor Variance request.
> > > However, its still unclear as to whether they have withdrawn their NW39
> > > request. I left a message with them this morning. They sent in their
> > > PCN on 614101. We need to send them a letter before the 60 days. I'll
> > > right the correspondence or approval letter to them as soon as 1 find
> > > out what they want. They are currently proposing 97 feet of stream
> > > (this may be a feature not subject to the buffer rules; jurisdictional
> > > ephemeral channel or wetland, however they did not request any wetland
> > > impact). The NW39 is currently triggering their proposed Extended
> > > Detention Wetlands. Cyndi, Please make sure that I'm copied on any
> > > tracking or tardy notices for this project. Thanks,
> > > - Bob
Bob Zarzecki
NC DENR/DWQ 401 Wetlands Certification Unit
919-733-9726
I of 2 7/23/01 5:13 Ph
Wal-Mart DiSt6hL16011 Sitc VAMT Co.
Subject: Wal-Mart Distribution Site Vance Co.
Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2001 08:31:42 -0400
From: Bob Zarzecki <[e-mail]>
Organization: Division of Water Quality; 401 Certification Unit
To: John Dorney <[e-mail]>, Steve Mitchell <[e-mail]>
CC: Cyndi Karoly <[e-mail]>, John Hennessy <[e-mail]>,
"Todd St. John" <todd.st.john(a)ncmail.net>
John and Steve,
I received a letter and construction plan for the Wal-Mart distribution
site in Vance Co. They have withdrawn their Minor Variance request.
However, its still unclear as to whether they have withdrawn their NW39
request. I left a message with them this morning. They sent in their
PCN on 6/4/01. We need to send them a letter before the 60 days. I'll
right the correspondence or approval letter to them as soon as I find
out what they want. They are currently proposing 97 feet of stream
(this may be a feature not subject to the buffer rules; jurisdictional
ephemeral channel or wetland, however they did not request any wetland
impact). The NW39 is currently triggering their proposed Extended
Detention Wetlands. Cyndi, Please make sure that I'm copied on any
tracking or tardy notices for this project. Thanks,
- Bob
Bob Zarzecki
Environmental Specialist III - DENR/ DWQ
401 Wetlands Certification Unit
/LOA
1 41 7/20/01 8:32 AM
c
zc? IV
/Zoo/
-Sc
G-V
76-,?j
512 N. Salisbury St. Raleigh NC 27604 Phone [phone]

Carter 4urgess
July 18, 2001
I9
....: WTFI? I
Mr. Bob Zarzeky
Department of Environmental and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
2321 Crabtree Boulevard, Suite 250
Raleigh, NC 27604-2260
SU(11 M<?n? ii<nn
IInt Walh, /;,1 3/ 46
H""I" 8I i_777}8,'WO
I m. E' I /.727.8')"0
WWWt hI01),
RE: Wetlands Application, Project Permits
Wal-Mart Distribution Center, Vance County, Henderson, North Carolina
Dear Mr. Zarzeky,
Attached please find the revised Wetlands Exhibit #1 showing the updated grading plan
and retaining wall adjacent to the Tar-Pamlico River basin. This proposal will allow the
Wal-Mart project to avoid Buffer Zones 1 and 2 of the river basin.
Due to these design changes, Carter & Burgess is withdrawing the request for a minor
variance contained in the 404/401 application issued on May 29, 2001.
If you have any questions, please feel free to contact either Mike Latz at 817.222.8646
or me at 817.222.8936.
Sincerely,
CARTER & BURGESS, INC.
(?aa '? )gt?
David L. Nortman, P.E.
Project Manager
DLN/lau
Attachments: Wetlands Exhibit #1 (Revised) - Grading Plan
RAJOB\290201 \W P\Ie1010sw.p9l .doc
cc: Correspondence Paul Kruckemeyer
Terry Groom Mike Latz
Steve Karras
t'nh.i ?C hof(p s?" Ins C.(nb-t h 11ui?lr., , .I-1111wil" ICI, ['11-n ?Y kill'I AI, 1111.,. I it n?lln i i". Pi I'li-ti I?111d A'' Iii, I 'Lii Iln? ? r.. Ins < <`?I' IJ v?u?n, In..
4 73 ---
-- /
--------------------- --- --------------- -
'?? I I I I I I ?_
72

i
--------------- --------------------
, i
; i
i
'
i
i
Lc) Ln O i
Lp LO lfl i
? Q ? Q i I
;50' BUFFER\,\
° ZONE
i J i ,
LLJ:
'
W
i ,
;tom'
; t
p,
1 '
i Q

--- -- ----------------------
i
;' II
i
I
I
i
i
i
i
i
i
i
i
i
i
i
i
1
1
1
1
i
1
i
i
1
i
--------------
? S\?GMENTAL.
RETA'd N I NG WALL
RE: 1121C10e 01
i
1
--END OF
i I STREAM
i i
! i
•, I
i
i i
i i
i
1 p i
i i
i i
i i
ii
i i
i i
i i
I I
1 `? 1
1 f
i ? II
i fI
TITLE: WETLANDS EXHIBIT #1 (REVISED)
PROPOSED CONDITIONS
I?

ZONE 2
50' BUFFER
ZONE

f 1
I i
1 1
DATE; 07/17/01 SCALE: NTS
-- REF. DWG. NO. C3.14
Carter:: Burgess P D C #6091
Con,ubum, in Rlnn,.ing, Ena,med- A,cW,--' H E N D E R S 0 N, NC SHEET I OF
.\290201\CIV\SWALLEXHIBIT.DGN 07/17/2001 04:02:06 PM
N C po k?t

-T
GL
512 N. Salisbury St. Raleigh NC 27604 Phone [phone]
/ "&7Z-.
Carter, tBurgass
201 Brookfield Parkway, Suite 200
Greenville, SC 29607
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL
ZA A V Date: June 25, 2001
Project No.: 290201, Henderson, NC
911 a, 7",, C* F 77 Re: Wotiands

We are sending you these items via:
REMARKS: Plaaso call to discuss ;
SENDER: Tim Campbell TELEPHONE. [phone]
ONION wd9g:ol [ooz
06/22/01 15:09 FAX [phone]
i
CARTER & BURGESS

[A003
NAL? WETL
076?ACRE
n
A 1
35°00' 00"
PLAN TRUE NWTN
NORTH
S
SCALE: N.T.S. l
:55 PM
REF. DWG. NO.
SUPPLEMENTAL DWG NO. C-2
Nvtg:0I 100Z 'q,,unr
06/22/01 15:08 FAX [phone]
--7 7T7-
ADD
3,3
E TL AND S
(TITLE: WI
P
4: Carftrl=Bu
Cep;. mfdi in w,.aM. A w M
i in?s? a?E ' d 'L8 £ 9 ' o
CARTER & BURGESS
08:53:1.W '.
It 002
PATE 5/25101 SCALE: N.T.S.
QWG. N0. CB s
*?1;1i>f!t f MF:.NTAI. DWG NO. G-1
.u......... ,._.......... ....
,---
NVL9. o < 100Z '9'o' unr
09.) l
L J R S CT NAL L ?- r
A E F E 0. 76 ACRE
?? ?I
----------------- ----
------------
DE - -----'
T ION
-AND -S ----------

1
a,
0
\.

i
1
1
1
N 1901t??1 \
E 99?36/ SE /
1 '
1
1
I?
OF
50 BUFF
'EX TE
WE TLNTDS
??

35° 00' 00"
N TRUE NORTH
N TH
tt?tt?tC? . ,
?• - C0N4R
N 16911.94 i -'
E 9693.09
WETLANDS EXHIBIT NO. 1
PROPOSED CONDITIONS
er:: Burgess PDC
'l-ng.EnQin-h.g,Avhlt.--, HENDERSON, NC
-ni, and R.1.1.d S-i-
/\WETLANDMAPS.dgn 05/30/2001 08:53:58 AM
DATE: 5/25/01
REF. DWG. NO.
SUPPLEMENTAL DWG. NO.
SCALE: N.T.S.
CB:
?C-1
6I ¦ ¦
D
10 r-04"
YJNC3 eloluaA,03
sxn,0?311 014
..fm r.WtAOIR
JHr4jra

AREIFtEr?';CTO:Q76 ACRESNDS
1 ?
a
b
b

T

=_=_c__________
%
I ?

DE T I ON

ANDS ,.
.

I

< ..
C,
N 01T?0T
E 9936, S! ; ?
, ,
' ,

(/
- .... .............. ..............J .
. 18974.
E 9093.09
i

WETLANDS EXHIBIT NO. 1
PROPOSED CONDITIONS
ern Burgess PDc
Ponnno.Enoine.rln0,Amhltoc n, HENDERSON NC
10-9• -1, and K.1.1.d S.M.- ,
AWETLANDMAPS.dgn 05/30/2001 08:53:58 AM
Db IN m
OP
50 BUFF
a
b
b
a
47 7 r.
L
a
b
b
\
1
a
b
\\
Bl?l
LNTANw
KKR
A .
35° 00' 00"
N TRUE NORTH
N TH
tp?N,C?
i
DATE: 5/25/01 SCALE: N.T.S.
REF. DWG. NO. CB:
SUPPLEMENTAL DWG. NO. C-1
G It

-ai
D
40 yjl?
0409 waim Jjw 41to
WHO C44, M".:5
..W6 c,1yo?w
JJ414joa
tok7ii z
BENCH AMAKi
'--? ? \ \ 1. 2.01 rr rarl
lu••tla .?...,
\ L 00.4 WI 1/0t0.i
(ll••t IA •?..?,
I
TM3 PARKING Ek ISLAN I - - l
° EL STORAGE I1 I
READY LINE `. d^ 1
I-! r 11 ?' j II I I
T Il 4r" I lam. - I
' AREA. 400
?.- MIR IGER, TlpI I I T 1 ?
REP - - -, - A?iE- P - 100
_ J I 1 I
RGY CE TE
f - 1-I?-- I-
1?1?
T R A tL-ISR-- MKiNG
WETLANDS 1

EXTENDED,,.--"DETENTION
WETLAND
IL
qw ?t•t .O
=RACE - GRADING PLAN NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION
1 •_?? FOR INFORMATION ONLY
copyr;plt o 2001 h
y
?-*"toat
"11HAdAY -VV?M &MIJ dqj??
OX9=09k, gc---o
iiil ? 4 &

Carter Surgess
PAYME"IT
RECEIVED
LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL
IOiil M???nliurn
I' a I W''I Ih, I, ,,n /,51 1/ zl.1,0 i
fi-w I0,' ' : 'I" W)HO
010825
Attention: T. J. Pappas Date: 5/30/2001 Project No: 290201.030
To: ECS, Ltd. Re: PDC 6091 - Henderson, North Carolina
2933 S. Miami Blvd., Suite 107
Duram, NC 27703

We Are Sending You These Items Via:
COPIES DATE DESCRIPTION
jQ Section 404/401
Package
1 `
J \(? -rve, I (A2 tz(y-), or)

For approval For your use For review & comment
REMARKS:
I SENDER: Terry Groom Telephone: [phone]
PREVIOUSLY SCANNED DOCUMENTS:
? FILE COPIES PERSON ? FILE COPIES PERSON ? FILE COPIES PERSON
Division Manager ? Civil TKG Fire Protection
? Program Manager MTL Architectural Plumbing
? Project Management DLN Structural Rack & Conveyor
Site Selection Mechanical Other
Scheduling
Electrical
?
Correspondence
L L
in Refrigeration Send Original to Addressee
? indicated above Return Original to C.A. Dept. Return Original to Sender
R:UOB\290201\W P\LOT024SW.133.DOC
Federal Express Standard
t nila i ',u„I"" , In< < llh,i "liui<p . ?In ?.nl?inl, h., I11- 1„1, .,. I,1,, ;_'I n,1in,•,?i I',. ? I I,III,I /V, III, L_:I nrliii,"I If" < '.P, I I,,?.i, 111 1,p
Carter Surgess
May 29, 2001
'F(Y)I Ahun,.?unu
I,nt wu 16 i?•x?,, ??,I:?i 400
/,VWl il,tcM
Department of Environmental and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality, Wetlands/ 401 Unit
2321 Crabtree Boulevard, Suite 250
Raleigh, NC 27604-2260
Attn: John Dorney
RE: Wetlands Application, Project Permits
Wal-Mart Distribution Center, Vance County, Henderson, NC
Dear Mr. Dorney:
Enclosed is the wetlands package for the proposed Wal-Mart Distribution Center to be
located southeast of the intersection of U.S. Hwy 1 and S.R. 1148, Henderson, Vance
County, NC. Included in the package are the following items:
1. PCN application form (404/401 Certification) with attached maps.
2. A check in the amount of $200.00 for application fee.
3. Variance Request Form for Minor Variances.
4. Agent authorization letter from property owner.
5. Archaeological Survey Report, 277 and 321.
6. Endangered Species Evaluation.
Please review the enclosed information for its completeness and process for approval.
If you have any questions, comments, or require any additional information, don't
hesitate to call me at [phone].
Sincerely,
CARTER & BURGESS, INC.
oa,-x .I gat,
David Nortman, P.E.
Project Manager
DLN/lau
Enclosures
R:\JOB\290201 \W P\Iet007sw.p9l .doc
cc: Correspondence Paul Kruckemeyer
Jim Emerson Terry Groom
Mike Latz Steve Karras - via EDMS
uib i ?4 i1unl? Ins (ni1,,i ?`. I'ui(tr.,.1 ,"I ',It,int?.. hu Ii-11 I?i- I ;y,I ?''t,, r., I rntnic:?i /A.i, 1 iil,, I,;I utilw-f,, Irn
01 08205

0
\N A
QG
Pre-Construction Notification (PCN) Application Form
Ll
For Section 404 and/or Section 10 Nationwide, Regional and General Permits, Section 401
General Water Quality Certifications, and Riparian Buffer and Watershed Buffer Rules
This form is to be used for projects qualifying for any of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers' (USACE)
Nationwide, Regional or General Permits as required by Section 404 of the Clean Water Act and/or
Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act, and for the North Carolina Division of Water Quality's
(DWQ) associated General 401 Water Quality Certifications. This form is also to be used for any
project requiring approval under any Riparian Buffer Rules implemented by the N.C. Division of Water
Quality. This form should not be used if you are requesting an Individual 404 Permit or Individual 401
• Water Quality Certification. The USACE Individual Permit application form is available online at
http://www.saw.usace.army.mil/wetlands/Perm app.htm.
The USACE is the lead regulatory agency. To review the requirements for the use of Nationwide,
Regional or General permits, and to determine which permit applies to your project, please go to the
USACE website at http://www.saw.usace.anny.mil/wetlands/regtour.htm, or contact one of the field
offices listed at the end of this application. The website also lists the responsible project manager for
each county in North Carolina and provides additional information regarding the identification and
regulation of wetlands and waters of the U.S.
The DWQ issues a corresponding Certification (General or Individual), and cannot tell the applicant
which 401 Certification will apply until the 404 Permit type has been determined by the USACE.
Applicants are encouraged to visit DWQ's 401/Wetlands Unit website at
http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands to read about current requirements for the 401 Water Quality
Certification Program and to determine whether or not Riparian Buffer Rules are applicable. The
applicant is also advised to read the full text of the General Certification (GC) matching the specific 404
Permit requested. In some cases, written approval for some General Certifications is not required,
provided that the applicant adheres to all conditions of the GC. Applicants lacking access to the internet
should contact DWQ's Central Office in Raleigh at [phone].
Trout Waters Coordination - Special coordination with the North Carolina Wildlife Resources
Commission (NCWRC) is also required for projects occurring in any of North Carolina's twenty-five
counties that contain trout waters. In such cases, the applicant should contact the appropriate NCWRC
regional coordinator (listed by county on the last page of this application).
Page 1 of 12
PAYMENT
RECEIVED
• CAMA Coordination - If the project occurs in any of North Carolina's twenty coastal counties (listed on
the last page of this application) the applicant should also contact the North Carolina Division of Coastal
Management (DCM) at [phone]. DCM will determine whether or not the project involves a
designated Area of Environmental Concern, in which case DCM will act as the lead permitting agency.
In such cases, DCM will require a Coastal Area Management Act (CAMA) Permit and will coordinate
the 404/401 Permits.
USACE Permits - Submit one copy of this form, along with supporting narratives, maps, data forms,
photos, etc. to the applicable USACE Regulatory Field Office (addresses are listed at the end of this
application). Upon receipt of an application, the USACE will determine if the application is complete as
soon as possible, not to exceed 30 days. This PCN form is designed for the convenience of the applicant
to address information needs for all USACE Nationwide, Regional or General permits, as well as
information required for State authorizations, certifications, and coordination. Fully providing the
information requested on this form will result in a complete application for any of the USACE
Nationwide, Regional or General permits. To review the minimum amount of information that must be
provided for a complete PCN for each USACE Nationwide permit, see Condition 13, 65 Fed.Reg. 12893
(March 9, 2000), available at http://www.saw.usace.army.mil/wetlands/nyMfinalFedReli.pdf.
Processing times vary by permit and begin once the application has been determined to be complete.
Please contact the appropriate regulatory field office for specific answers to permit processing periods.
401 Water Quality Certification or Buffer Rules - All information is required unless otherwise stated
as optional. Incomplete applications will be returned. Submit seven collated copies of all USACE
• Permit materials to the Division of Water Quality, 401/Wetlands Unit, 1650 Mail Service Center,
Raleigh, NC, 27699-1650. If written approval is required or specifically requested for a 401
Certification, then a non-refundable application fee is required. In brief, if project impacts include less
than one acre of cumulative wetland/water impacts and less than 150 feet cumulative impacts to
streams, then a fee of $200 is required. If either of these thresholds is exceeded, then a fee of $475 is
required. A check made out to the North Carolina Division of Water Quality, with the specific name of
the project or applicant identified, should be stapled to the front of the application package. For more
information, see the DWQ website at http://h2o.ehnr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands/fees.html. The fee must be
attached with the application unless the applicant is a federal agency in which case the check may be
issued from a separate office. In such cases, the project must be identifiable on the U.S. Treasury check
so that it can be credited to the appropriate project. If written approval is sought solely for Buffer Rules,
the application fee does not apply, and the applicant should clearly state (in a cover letter) that only
Buffer Rule approval is sought in writing. Wetlands or waters of the U.S. may not be impacted prior to
issuance or waiver of a Section 401 Water Quality Certification. Upon receipt of a complete application
for a 401 Certification, the Division of Water Quality has 60 days to prepare a written response to the
applicant. This may include a 401 Certification, an on-hold letter pending receipt of additional
requested information, or denial.
•
Page 2 of 12
•
Office Use Only: Form Version April 2001
USACE Action ID No. DWQ No. 0 ? 8 2 5
If any particular item is not applicable to this project, please enter "Not Applicable" or "N/A" rather than
leaving the space blank.
1. Processing
1. Check all of the approval(s) requested for this project:
Section 404 Permit
? Section 10 Permit
[.? 401 Water Quality Certification
[?]? Riparian or Watershed Buffer Rules
2. Nationwide, Regional or General Permit Number(s) Requested: Nationwide 39
3. If this notification is solely a courtesy copy because written approval for the 401 Certification
is not required, check here: ?Not applicable
4. If payment into the North Carolina Wetlands Restoration Program (NCWRP) is proposed for
mitigation of impacts (see section VIII - Mitigation), check here: ? Not applicable
II. Applicant Information
1. Owner/Applicant Information
Name: Wal-Mart Stores East, Inc. - Steve Karras
Mailing Address: 2001 Southeast loth Street
Bentonville, AR 72716-0550
•
Telephone Number: [phone] Fax Number: [phone]
E-mail Address: [e-mail]
-} 2. Agent Information (A signed and dated copy of the Agent Authorization letter must be
attached if the Agent has signatory authority for the owner/applicant.)
Name: Carter & Burgess, Inc. - Terry Groom
Company Affiliation: Consultant
Mailing Address: 3001 Meacham Boulevard, Suite 200
Fort Worth, Texas 76137
Telephone Number: [phone] Fax Number: [phone]
E-mail Address: [e-mail]
Page 3 of 12
0 111. Project Information
•
Attach a vicinity map clearly showing the location of the property with respect to local
landmarks such as towns, rivers, and roads. Also provide a detailed site plan showing property
boundaries and development plans in relation to surrounding properties. Both the vicinity map
and site plan must include a scale and north arrow. The specific footprints of all buildings,
impervious surfaces, or other facilities must be included. If possible, the maps and plans should
include the appropriate USGS Topographic Quad Map and NRCS Soil Survey with the property
boundaries outlined. Plan drawings, or other maps may be included at the applicant's discretion,
so long as the property is clearly defined. For administrative and distribution purposes, the
USACE requires information to be submitted on sheets no larger than 11 by 17-inch format;
however, DWQ may accept paperwork of any size. DWQ prefers full-size construction
drawings rather than a sequential sheet version of the full-size plans. If full-size plans are
reduced to a small scale such that the final version is illegible, the applicant will be informed that
the project has been placed on hold until decipherable maps are provided.
1. Name of project: Wal-Mart Distribution Center
2. T.I.P. Project Number (NCDOT Only): Not applicable
3. Property Identification Number (Tax PN: 541-4-10a, 541-4-16, 222-4-1
4. Location
Nearest Town: Henderson
Subdivision name (include phase/lot number): Not applicable
Directions to site (include road numbers, landmarks, etc.): Located at the southeastern
corner of the intersection of U.S. Route 1 bypass and S.R. 1148.
County: Vance
5. Site coordinates, if available (UTM or Lat/Long): 37° 17' 38" N / 78° 23' 00" w
(Note - If project is linear, such as a road or utility line, attach a sheet that separately lists the
coordinates for each crossing of a distinct waterbody.)
6. Describe the existing land use or condition of the site at the time of this application: The
eastern portion of the site consists of open grass land, the northern and western portions are
heavily wooded, and the southern portion is wooded with thick under brush
7. Property size (acres): 132
8. Nearest body of water (stream/river/sound/ocean/lake): Martin Creek
9. River Basin: Tar-Pamlico
(Note - this must be one of North Carolina's seventeen designated major river basins. The
River Basin map is available at http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/admin/maps/.)
Page 4 of 12
10. Describe the purpose of the proposed work: To construct +/-300,000 S.F. cold storage
facility along with parking, utilities, and stormwater management facilities, including
grading for +/-475,000 S.F. expansion.
11. List the type of equipment to be used to construct the project: Heavy construction equipment
used in major earthwork projects.
12. Describe the land use in the vicinity of this project: Industrial and residential.
Our property is zoned industrial.
IV. Prior Project History
If jurisdictional determinations and/or permits have been requested and/or obtained for this
project (including all prior phases of the same subdivision) in the past, please explain. Include
the USACE Action ID Number, DWQ Project Number, application date, and date permits and
certifications were issued or withdrawn. Provide photocopies of previously issued permits,
certifications or other useful information. Describe previously approved wetland, stream and
buffer impacts, along with associated mitigation (where applicable). If this is a NCDOT project,
list and describe permits issued for prior segments of the same T.I.P. project, along with
construction schedules.
Not applicable.
V. Future Project Plans
Are any additional permit requests anticipated for this project in the future? If so, describe the
anticipated work, and provide justification for the exclusion of this work from the current
application: No, this application includes areas designated for future expansion in the
design of the extended detention wetlands.
VI. Proposed Impacts to Waters of the United States/Waters of the State
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
wetlands, open water, and stream channels associated with the project. The applicant must also
provide justification for these impacts in Section VII below. All proposed impacts, permanent
and temporary, must be listed herein, and must be clearly identifiable on an accompanying site
plan. All wetlands and waters, and all streams (intermittent and perennial) must be shown on a
delineation map, whether or not impacts are proposed to these systems. Wetland and stream
evaluation and delineation forms should be included as appropriate. Photographs may be
included at the applicant's discretion. If this proposed impact is strictly for wetland or stream
• mitigation, list and describe the impact in Section VIII below. If additional space is needed for
listing or description, please attach a separate sheet.
Page 5 of 12
• 1. Wetland Impacts
Wetland Impact
Site Number
(indicate on ma
Type of Impact* Area of
Impact
(acres) Located within
100-year Floodplain**
(es/no Distance to
Nearest Stream
(linear feet
Type of Wetland***
1 Fill 0.076 no 1150 forested wetland

* List each impact separately and identify temporary impacts. Impacts include, but are not limited to: mechanized clearing, grading, fill,
excavation, flooding, ditching/drainage, etc. For dams, separately list impacts due to both structure and flooding.
100-Year floodplains are identified through the Federal Emergency Management Agency's (FEMA) Flood Insurance Rate Maps
(FIRM), or FEMA-approved local floodplain maps. Maps are available through the FEMA Map Service Center at 1-800-358-9616, or
online at http://www.fema.gov.
*** List a wetland type that best describes wetland to be impacted (e.g., freshwater/saltwater marsh, forested wetland, beaver pond,
Carolina Bay, bog, etc.)
List the total acreage (estimated) of existing wetlands on the property:
Total area of wetland impact proposed: 0.076
• 2. Stream Impacts, including all intermittent and perennial streams
Stream Impact
Site Number
indicate on ma
Type of Impact* Length of
Impact
linear feet
Stream Name** Average Width
of Stream
Before Impact Perennial or
Intermittent?
leases eci
1 Fill 97 I/T to Martin Creek 5' I

* List each impact separately and identify temporary impacts. Impacts include, but are not limited to: culverts and associated rip-rap,
dams (separately list impacts due to both structure and flooding), relocation (include linear feet before and after, and net loss/gain),
stabilization activities (cement wall, rip-rap, crib wall, gabions, etc.), excavation, ditching/straightening, etc. If stream relocation is
proposed, plans and profiles showing the linear footprint for both the original and relocated streams must be included.
** Stream names can be found on USGS topographic maps. If a stream has no name, list as UT (unnamed tributary) to the nearest
downstream named stream into which it flows. USGS maps are available through the USGS at 1-800-358-9616, or online at
www.us¢s.eov. Several intemet sites also allow direct download and printing of USGS maps (e.g., www.topozone.com,
www.mapguest.com, etc.).
Cumulative impacts (linear distance in feet) to all streams on site: 97
0.076
Page 6 of 12
0 3. Open Water Impacts, including Lakes, Ponds, Estuaries, Sounds, Atlantic Ocean and any
other Water of the U.S.
Open Water Impact
Site Number
(indicate on ma
Type of Impact* Area of
Impact
(acres
(if applicable) Name Wat)
plicabbllee) Type of Waterbody
(lake, pond, estuary, sound,
bay, ocean, etc.

List each impact separately and identity temporary impacts. Impacts include, but are not limited to: till, excavation, dredging,
flooding, drainage, bulkheads, etc.
4. Pond Creation
If construction of a pond is proposed, associated wetland and stream impacts should be
included above in the wetland and stream impact sections. Also, the proposed pond should
be described here and illustrated on any maps incl ed with this application.
Pond to be created in (check all that apply): 0 uplands ? stream ? wetlands
Describe the method of construction (e.g., dam/embankment, excavation, installation of
draw-down valve or spillway, etc.): Dam/embankment - extended detention wetland ponds -
see enclosed plan for locations.
Proposed use or purpose of pond (e.g., livestock watering, irrigation, aesthetic, trout pond,
local stormwater requirement, etc.): to meet stormwater requirements - extended
detention wetland basins
Size of watershed draining to pond: 116 AC.s Expected pond surface area: 14 AC.s
VII. Impact Justification (Avoidance and Minimization)
Specifically describe measures taken to avoid the proposed impacts. It may be useful to provide
information related to site constraints such as topography, building ordinances, accessibility, and
financial viability of the project. The applicant may attach drawings of alternative, lower-impact
site layouts, and explain why these design options were not feasible. Also discuss how impacts
were minimized once the desired site plan was developed. If applicable, discuss construction
techniques to be followed during construction to reduce impacts.
There were several factors that led to the site configuration. As follows: to the south of the
proposed site there is an existing cemetery and Martin Creek that bound the site; to the north
and northwest there are some existing residential properties that we were unable to obtain.
We have tried many layouts. The final layout we are submitting creates the least amount of
impact to layout we are submitting creates the least amount of impact to the wetlands and
still allows us to meet all of our site criteria.
0
Page 7 of 12
0 VIII. Mitigation
DWQ - In accordance with 15A NCAC 2H .0500, mitigation may be required by the NC
Division of Water Quality for projects involving greater than or equal to one acre of impacts to
freshwater wetlands or greater than or equal to 150 linear feet of total impacts to perennial
streams.
USACE - In accordance with the Final Notice of Issuance and Modification of Nationwide
Permits, published in the Federal Register on March 9, 2000, mitigation will be required when
necessary to ensure that adverse effects to the aquatic environment are minimal. Factors
including size and type of proposed impact and function and relative value of the impacted
aquatic resource will be considered in determining acceptability of appropriate and practicable
mitigation as proposed. Examples of mitigation that may be appropriate and practicable include,
but are not limited to: reducing the size of the project; establishing and maintaining wetland
and/or upland vegetated buffers to protect open waters such as streams; and replacing losses of
aquatic resource functions and values by creating, restoring, enhancing, or preserving similar
functions and values, preferable in the same watershed.
If mitigation is required for this project, a copy of the mitigation plan must be attached in order
for USACE or DWQ to consider the application complete for processing. Any application
lacking a required mitigation plan or NCWRP concurrence shall be placed on hold as
incomplete. An applicant may also choose to review the current guidelines for stream restoration
. in DWQ's Draft Technical Guide for Stream Work in North Carolina, available at
http:/ih2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands/strmgide.html.
1. Provide a brief description of the proposed mitigation plan. The description should provide
as much information as possible, including, but not limited to: site location (attach directions
and/or map, if offsite), affected stream and river basin, type and amount (acreage/linear feet)
of mitigation proposed (restoration, enhancement, creation, or preservation), a plan view,
preservation mechanism (e.g., deed restrictions, conservation easement, etc.), and a
description of the current site conditions and proposed method of construction. Please attach
a separate sheet if more space is needed.
Not applicable
•
Page 8 of 12
2. Mitigation may also be made by payment into the North Carolina Wetlands Restoration
Program (NCWRP) with the NCWRP's written agreement. Check the box indicating that
you would like to pay into the NCWRP. Please note that payment into the NCWRP must be
reviewed and approved before it can be used to satisfy mitigation requirements. Applicants
will be notified early in the review process by the 401/Wetlands Unit if payment into the
NCWRP is available as an option. For additional information regarding the application
process for the NCWRP, check the NCWRP website at hqp://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/M/index.htm. If
use of the NCWRP is proposed, please check the appropriate box on page three and provide
the following information:
Amount of stream mitigation requested (linear feet): Not applicable
Amount of buffer mitigation requested (square feet): Not applicable
Amount of Riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres): Not applicable
Amount of Non-riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres): Not applicable
Amount of Coastal wetland mitigation requested (acres): Not applicable
IX. Environmental Documentation (DWQ Only)
Does the project involve an expenditure of public funds or the use of public (federal/state/local)
land?
Yes ? No 21/
• If yes, does the project require preparation of an environmental document pursuant to the
requirements of the National or North Carolina Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
Note: If you are not sure whether a NEPA/SEPA document is required, call the SEPA
coordinator at [phone] to review current thresholds for environmental documentation.
Yes ? No ?
If yes, has the document review been finalized by the State Clearinghouse? If so, please attach a
copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval letter.
Yes ? No ?
X. Proposed Impacts on Riparian and Watershed Buffers (DWQ Only)
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
required state and local buffers associated with the project. The applicant must also provide
justification for these impacts in Section VII above. All proposed impacts must be listed herein,
and must be clearly identifiable on the accompanying site plan. All buffers must be shown on a
map, whether or not impacts are proposed to the buffers. Correspondence from the DWQ
Regional Office may be included as appropriate. Photographs may also be included at the
applicant's discretion.
Will the project impact protected riparian buffers identified within 15A NCAC 2B .0233
(Meuse), 15A NCAC 2B .0259 (Tar-Pamlico), 15A NCAC 2B .0250 (Randleman Rules and
Water SupplT ffer Requirements), or other (please identify )?
• Yes No ? If you answered "yes", provide the following information:
Page 9 of 12
Identify the square feet and acreage of impact to each zone of the riparian buffers. If buffer
mitigation is required calculate the required amount of mitigation by applying the buffer
multipliers.
Zone* Impact
(square feet Multiplier Required
Mitigation
1 26,660 3 79,980 S.F.
2 16,117 1.5 24,176 S.F.
Total 42,777 104,155.5 S.
* Zone I extends out 30 feet perpendicular from near bank of channel; Zone 2 extends an
additional 20 feet from the edge of Zone 1.
If buffer mitigation is required, please discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (i.e., Donation
of Property, Conservation Easement, Riparian Buffer Restoration / Enhancement, Preservation or
Payment into the Riparian Buffer Restoration Fund). Please attach all appropriate information as
identified within 15A NCAC 2B .0242 or.0260.
Please see minor variance request form.
. XI. Stormwater (DWQ Only)
Describe impervious acreage (both existing and proposed) versus total acreage on the site.
Discuss stormwater controls proposed in order to protect surface waters and wetlands
downstream from the property.
Total acreage of site is equal to 132 AC.S. Existing impervious is 2.27 acres. Proposed
impervious is equal to 66.34 AC.S. We will construct extended detention wetlands in order to
protect downstream surface waters and wetlands.
XII. Sewage Disposal (DWQ Only)
Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of
wastewater generated from the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
On-site sewer will tie into the public sewer system and will be treated at the local
wastewater treatment plant.
XIII. Violations (DWQ Only)
Is this site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500) or any Buffer Rules?
Yes ? No Q'
Is this an after-the-fact permit application?
• Yes ? No [2'
Page 10 of 12
0 XIV. Other Circumstances (Optional):
It is the applicant's responsibility to submit the application sufficiently in advance of desired
construction dates to allow processing time for these permits. However, an applicant may
choose to list constraints associated with construction or sequencing that may impose limits on
work schedules (e.g., draw-down schedules for lakes, dates associated with Endangered and
Threatened Species, accessibility problems, or other issues outside of the applicant's control).
Not applicable

s/3a/d
Applicant/Ajeiiit's Sign Date
(Agent's signature is vali only if an authorization letter from the applicant is provided.)
US Army Corps Of Engineers Field Offices and County Coverage
Asheville Regulatory Field Office Alexander Cherokee Iredell Mitchell
US Army Corps of Engineers Avery Clay Jackson Polk
151 Patton Avenue Buncombe Cleveland Lincoln Rowan
Room 208 Burke Gaston Macon Rutherford
Asheville, NC 28801-5006 Cabarrus Graham Madison Stanley
Telephone: [phone] Caldwell Haywood McDowell Swain
Fax: [phone] Catawba Henderson Mecklenburg Transylvania
Raleigh Regulatory Field Office Alamance Durham Johnston Rockingham
US Army Corps Of Engineers Alleghany Edgecombe Lee Stokes
6508 Falls of the Neuse Road Ashe Franklin Nash Surry
Suite 120 Caswell Forsyth Northampton Vance
Raleigh, NC 27615 Chatham Granville Orange Wake
Telephone: [phone] Davidson Guilford Person Warren
Fax: [phone] Davie Halifax Randolph Wilkes
Washington Regulatory Field Office Beaufort Currituck Jones
US Army Corps Of Engineers Bertie Dare Lenoir
Post Office Box 1000 Camden Gates Martin
Washington, NC 27889-1000 Carteret* Green Pamlico
Telephone: [phone] Chowan Hertford Pasquotank
Fax: [phone] Craven Hyde Perquimans
Wilmington Regulatory Field Office Anson Duplin Onslow
US Army Corps Of Engineers Bladen Harnett Pender
Post Office Box 1890 Brunswick Hoke Richmond
Wilmington, NC 28402-1890 Carteret Montgomery Robeson
Telephone: [phone] Columbus Moore Sampson
Fax: [phone] Cumberland New Hanover Scotland
Pitt
Tyrrell
Washington
Wayne
Union
Watauga
Yancey
Wilson
Yadkin
*Croatan National Forest Only
Page 11 of 12
• US Fig
US Fish and Wildlife Service
Raleigh Field Office
Post Office Box 33726
Raleigh, NC 27636-3726
Telephone: [phone]
Division of Water Quality
401 Wetlands Unit
1650 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1650
Telephone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
I and Wildlife Service / National N
US Fish and Wildlife Service
Asheville Field Office
160 Zillicoa Street
Asheville, NC 28801
Telephone: [phone]
Division of Coastal Management
1638 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1638
Telephone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Western Piedmont Region Coordinator
3855 Idlewild Road
Kernersville, NC 27284-9180
Telephone: [phone]
Mountain Region Coordinator
20830 Great Smoky Mtn. Expressway
Waynesville, NC 28786
Telephone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]

larine Fisheries Service
National Marine Fisheries Service
Habitat Conservation Division
Pivers Island
Beaufort, NC 28516
Telephone: [phone]
North Carolina State Agencies
Division of Water Quality
Wetlands Restoration Program
1619 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1619
Telephone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
CAMA and NC Coastal Counties
Beaufort Chowan
Bertie Craven
Brunswick Currituck
Camden Dare
Carteret Gates
NCWRC and NC Trout Counties
State Historic Preservation Office
Department Of Cultural Resources
4617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-4617
Telephone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Hertford Pasquotank
Hyde Pender
New Hanover Perquimans
Onslow Tyrrell
Pamlico Washington
Alleghany Caldwell Watauga
Ashe Mitchell Wilkes
Avery Stokes
Burke Surry
Buncombe Henderson Polk
Cherokee Jackson Rutherford
Clay Macon Swain
Graham Madison Transylvania
Haywood McDowell Yancey
Page 12 of 12
05/ 30/ 2001 2158= 38 PM rs \ JOB\ 290201\ C I V\ HNCCG. SHT HNCCG. SHT
1H5'9J3NH\A19\I9Zo62\9of\Ij
nftt 11Y. 'tll It/I it,4 VNI IOHVO H1HON 1 Zns mvm n' not u wm J101 T
as tuns 'tarul wonrm loot
JINN wi msl li"luso I A'ma"o' 'NOSHMN3H NOINSOdNOD SMI V -'JNI'SS3oan8 4 Nnvy:) C)
OWN
MM OtJ 3-lf3VHSIH3d NVId JNIOVHJ - IIVH3A0 °woS P^IW^L Pu•Irau mu NO VNU dSOD moi v'wl?? M
e>»w't IDi9101i BsaB?na??aa?t?n? C)
ottn,.tt
" .18VW=1VM
b b
Z
W
m? r

J
H Z
UO
?Z
?0
U) H'
ZQ
Ofr
tr0
0LL
LL Z
I- CL
00
Z LL
1l tl bl-±q t ?iNf tllil
.mo v..alinn7:.lo,oc„io? • IlSosfl'ri' tlof:.l:h':•°.
` ????•pp•{{ yyqql?? ppapllI yyq p1 l}q ypI' 1 ,.: o?i?.,t,?'f ??
ti-:i.flV.I'Ni ft l0loti-0V.•f Uf.i VSa?{"i?OM?o It?tll?'W V'I. •f[' CSi•'1`-S?OiI tltl.'C'fC -N+b IIIS OOiwI, ISSIO aKS,
Im.,mil.,l , .o. rutw.w I l S .,,? Il.o ol.wllt.it:,l.,.ct?a.r.?, i:.Ynn.lfloi.uf.?r r,o.vtouoluv.?it o o t?.m = to..l c i ...
1* 0 0
a
b
O /
C?l
D3q?$OUA?2E?FjE?I1CTO.N76 AVEI CRESNDS
1 ,

_ __________ ----- ,
E TE DE DET ION `
' ??•`? ` 50 BUFF
ET ANDS
%
` i
/ iii; ? ,••'"
t COW
............. .:.._.............. ._.._.._. ._.._.._.._.._.... .............
._. /
t'MR9?
N Il9N.?
E 9!93.09l.
?ITLE: WETLANDS EXHIBIT NO. 1
PROPOSED CONDITIONS
Cc Carter:: Burgess PDC
can.uham..n Plann, "nam,e?no,?h?\HENDERSON, NC
,::.. cNon Mona 1.1, and Rdatsd SI.,
.\JOB\290201\CIV\WETLANDMAPS.dgn 05/30/2001 08:53:58 AM
b
AM \
b
1
G
r
W7/7
a \
b
b
b
'rvy
WETLNTD1-0
S

35° 00' 00"
PLAN TRUE NORTH
NORTH
DATE: 5/25/01 SCALE: N.T.S.
REF. DWG. NO. ICB:
SUPPLEMENTAL DWG. NO. C-1
D I ONAL J U I SD I C T ONAL? WE TL ND`
3,300 A E EET - 0 0761ACRE

1
464
1 1
1
1
x
/ o
I ?
1 M
1
1
/
t COWIE
N 0911.91 t ? ?
E 9!93.09 , /
END OF STREAM
50' BUFF R
.o
I ,•
1 ••
PLAN TRUE NORTH
1 .•
kTLE. WETLANDS EXHIBIT NO. 2
EXISTING CONDITIONS
. Carter:: Burgess PDC
Ccn,uhon?. in Planning, Enoine..Ing, A-hllsc -, HENDERSON, NC
Constrvcllon Mono -nr, and PW.I.d S-i...
.\JOB\290201\CIV\WETLANDMAPS.dgn 05/29/2001 04:20:55 PM
35° 00' 00"

NORTH
DATE: 5/25/01 SCALE: N.T.S.
REF. DWG. NO. C B :
SUPPLEMENTAL DWG. NO. C-2
USGS
j GL
Y ?`'1 _ -? t ?.I?f,1..?? f?- ' ti,..- i i
±?"'-,_..._?F.? ..? t.`? lt?, , ??ti_ '?. ? ? • rj ? ? r r 4 ?f ?f `f ?S ? 7 ???'?'?, i'," v 1'`. ', i ? ?3"'??'-?' a? ?` /
'" t, '?_• ? i?... ?i ? ?. ?'.!{?\]ijy' `?SrSd? +r"_...? `?„-?r//J///rl ?I[j` (?y7'r__ '' ?1i51" ky ?^' ? ? ? y? .r''? ? t
r} ? ' ?.F f1_ I fi/ S • /.' V{'I?i ?5 .??? il.•? 11 '11 ?..C4??
711 14L --l
'Al
.. ?'!
f 4` 1
" .... "?-,,..., ?`„?.. lr? .? ? rte.' .. •? `?? _..w.. y.ti`?.?
"
s"i
14
41 a
Aor
- I
'Jr
lit
77
NOT TO SCALE
AUB
HENDERSON tzt? ta82 t
(county seat is APB
- G ?? W? at4. f 1J
He9
.? _" 1AM f'? M • •? qty / 7W? / - LI, M - S ' t `•
Club
°"` + Tp
rt -4-
A B ' ; Due
• F f
AuB
fi t t, ` wZ 4 . PB
APB Pt ,
Ape:
1
? .APB r4 c'
Ap6
41
k y HeB
AuB 1 APB + w rs *`
T KfiP
I t trot I 4 p` " a c 1
rl 24
t ? 1 1.
y : U
B
/ , '
rz

# : Due
it
.
, 1 ?'"
1139
+?- 1 + DUB {
.

216
i` AUB 1 # •?+ `?,;
+ (
: r..

dO -, I
Au8
DuB? 1
;/11+13 } 1 }}
( DUB
* t
a'
fi
of u) y ;

DuB AuB ` 0?9

o DUB
\
-
DM
<rw <itoded F ?AAMP /ALlAl-rd 0/
?L 1
t. ,r
0.. AIL
r
a
-L

r
LoD
•

A,
O CS
s
?p
N.'
? A

cc o

A 0•
m k/
o r
J
R
^
? A w
i U n
u U
g
Z
W
G
Z ?
a x
d 00, w u'

aq
?iN !-
of
0 O
W R
C)
m m
„
Wpyp 'w.M!
yyu?opw
83ly?LLW1/OB •.A7L

bi
ui
rm
Er
cr
N
Ln
r.

1

U ru

fi
a A ?

1911 ?K
.-.

1 0 4 -8
9 o
•
¦
Tj, T? _
w
MRgOFI i0OD3M O1
MMf1 HXH1100
0
OFFICE USE ONLY: Date Received Request # ____ ______ _
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Variance Request Form - for Minor Variances
Protection and Maintenance of Riparian Areas Rules
NOTE. This form may be photocopied for use as an original.
Please identify which Riparian Area Protection Rule applies.
? Neuse River Basin: Nutrient Sensitive Waters Management Strategy
Protection and Maintenance of Riparian Areas Rule (15A NCAC .0233)
X Tar-Pamlico River Basin: Nutrient Sensitive Waters Management
Strategy Protection and Maintenance of Riparian Areas Rule (15A
NCAC.0259)
Part 1: General Information
(Please include attachments if the room provided is insufficient.)
1. Applicant's name (the corporation, individual, etc. who owns the property):
Wal-Mart Stores East, Inc.
2. Print Owner/Signing Official (person legally responsible for the property and its compliance)
Name; Wal-Mart Stores East, Inc. - Steve Karras
Title; Civil Program Manager
Street address: 2001 Southeast 10th Street
City, State, Zip: Bentonville AR 72716-0550
Telephone: [phone]
Fax: (501 } 273-1964
3. Contact person who can answer questions about the proposed project:
Name; Carter & Burgess, Inc. - Terry Groom
Telephone: (817 ) 222-8500
Fax: (817 ) 222-8550
Email: groomtkCac-b.com
4. Project Name (Subdivision, facility, or establishment name - consistent with project name on
plans, specifications, letters, operation and maintenance agreements, etc.):
Wal-Mart Distribution Center
5. Project Location:
Street address: u. S. Highway 1 and S.R. 1148
City, State, Zip: HPndPrson, N
County: Vance
Latitude/longitude: 36° 17' 30" N178° 23' 00" W
Version 1: February 2000
6. Directions to site from nearest major intersection (Also, attach an 8'/2 x 11 copy of the USGS
topographic map indicating the location of the site):
The facility will be constructed to the south of S R 1148 and to the Pact of li_S_
Highway 1 by-pass. (see attached location map).
7. Stream to be impacted by the proposed activity:
Stream name (for unnamed streams label as "UT" to the nearest named stream):
+/- 1200 L.F. to Martin Creek
Stream classification [as identified within the Schedule of Classifications 15A NCAC 2B
.0315 (Neuse) or.0316 (Tar-Pamlico)]: Tar-Pamlico
8. Which of the following permits/approvals will be required or have been received already for
this project?
Required: Received: Date received: Permit Type:
CAMA Major
CAMA Minor
X 401 Certification/404 Permit
On-site Wastewater Permit
X NPDES Permit (including stormwater)
Non-discharge Permit
Water Supply Watershed Variance
Others (specify)
• Part 2: Proposed Activity
(Please include attachments if the room provided is insufficient.)
1. Description of proposed activity [Also, please attach a map of sufficient detail (such as a plat
map or site plan) to accurately delineate the boundaries of the land to be utilized in carrying
out the activity, the location and dimension of any disturbance in the riparian buffers
associated with the activity, and the extent of riparian buffers on the land. Include the area
of buffer impact in ftz.]:
Construction will include a +/-300,000 S.F. cold storage facility with parking. utiliites
and stormwater management facilities along with grading for +1-475,000 S_F_ Pxpansinn_
Riparian buffer extends roughly 360 L.F. into property. We will disturb 97 L.F. area of
buffer impact = 0.98 acres
2. State reasons why this plan for the proposed activity cannot be practically accomplished,
reduced or reconfigured to better minimize or eliminate disturbance to the riparian buffers:
The site is bound by a cemetery and Martin Creek on the south side and some residential
property on the north side. The site has been shifted towards U.S. Highway 1 as far as
possible; therefore, thinimizing to the greatest extent the disturbance to the wetlandS_

3. Description of any best management practices to be used to control impacts associated with
the proposed activity (i.e., control of runoff from impervious surfaces to provide diffuse flow,
re-planting vegetation or enhancement of existing vegetation, etc.):
In accordance with DENR requirements and BMPs, we will construct extended detention wetland
facilities to offset the impacts.
Variance Request Form, page 2
Version 1: February 2000
. 4. Please provide an explanation of the following:
(1) The practical difficulties or hardships that would result from the strict application of this
Rule.
The building has been shifted away from the wetlands as far as possible. The truck operations
for distribution projects are critical. The layout has been compressed to its limits in order
to maintain the minimum truck operations.
(2) How these difficulties or hardships result from conditions that are unique to the property
involved.
Due to being bound by the cemetery, the adjoining properties unavailable for purchase,
and the wetlands (stream) we have reached the only possible layout for this unique
site that provides for a safely operating facility.
(3) If economic hardship is the major consideration, then include a specific explanation of the
economic hardships and the proportion of the hardship to the entire value of the project.
Not applicable - operation of the distribution center is the main hardship.
Part 3: Deed Restrictions
By your signature in Part 5 of this application, you certify that all structural stormwater best
management practices required by this variance shall be located in recorded stormwater
easements, that the easements will run with the land, that the easements cannot be chang
deleted without concurrence from the State, and that the easements will be recorded prior
sale of any lot.
Part 4: Agent Authorization
ed or
to the
If you wish to designate submittal authority to another individual or firm so that they may provide
information on your behalf, please complete this section:
Email: [e-mail]
Mailing address: 3001 Meacham Blvd.
City, State, Zip: Fort Worth, Texas
Telephone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Designated agent (individual or firm): carter & Burgess, Inc. - Terry Groom
Part 5: Applicant's Certification
E conditions. I
I, Terry Groom/Agent (print or type name of person
listed in Part I, Item 2), certify that the information included on this permit application form is
correct, that the project will be constructed in conformance with the approved plans and that the
deed restrictions in accordance with Part 5 of this form will be recorded with all required permit
Signature:
Date:
, Suite 200
76137
0
Variance Request Form, page 3
Version 1: February 2000
2E-@1 15:37 VANCE CCUNTY ECONOMIC DEV COMM ID=2S24G2442E F C2
VANCE COUNTY
Economic Development Commission
May 25, 2001
NC Department of Environmental
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
2321 Crabtree Boulevard, Suite 250
Raleigh, NC 27604-2260
RE: Wetlands Application
Wal-Mart Distribution Center, Vance County
Henderson, NC 27536
Dear Sirs: •
This is to inform you that Carter Burgess is acting as an agent on Vance County's behalf
Vance County is the owner of the property through the Henderson-Vance Industrial Park.
T am responsible for the park's activities. This letter grants permission to the USACE and
DENR DWQ to uivestigate the site in question and to male a determinatiun ofthc
presence or absence of jurisdictional wetlands or waters. We would like all information
pertinent to this property to be released to Carter Burgess and to Wal-Mart Stores, inc.
The property tax map #'s are 541-4-10A and 541-4-16.
Any questions please ca1L Thank you for your assistance with this request.
Sincerely,
Benny Finch
Executive Director
•
PC, Box 2017 + Henderson ? North Carolina 27536 + 2521492-2094 + Fax [phone]
•
ARCHAEOLOGICAL SURVEY OF THREE
TRACTS IN EDGECOMBE, NASH, AND
VANCE COUNTIES, NORTH CAROLINA
Zil MW.
.t•
CHICORA RESEARCH CONTRIBUTION 277

ARCHAEOLOGICAL SURVEY OF THREE
TRACTS IN EDGECOMBE, NASH,
AND VANCE COUNTIES, NORTH CAROLINA
Prepared {or:
Mr. Bob Froneberger
ARCADIS Geraghty & Miller, Inc.
420 Park Avenue
Greenville, South Carolina 29601
•
Prepared 6v:
Rachel Campo, RPA
and
Michael Trinhley, Ph.D., RPA
CHICORA RESEARCH CONTRIBUTION 276
1
Chicora Foundation, Inc.
P.O. Box 8664 a 861 Arbutus Drive
Columbia, South Carolina 29202
„ I 803/787-6910
Email: [e-mail]
July 26,1999
This report is printed un permanent paper R
C,
J
?J
ABSTRACT
C7
This study reports on an intensive
archaeological survey of three tracts of land in
Edgecom6e, Nash, and Vance Counties in North
Carolina. Each tract represents approximately 200
acres. The study was conducted at the request of
ARCADIS Geraghty and Miller, Incorporated.
Our field investigations found that conditions
at each tract varied greatly. At the Long tract, located
in Edgecombe County, approximately 30% of the tract
consisted of cultivated and fallow fields, while the
remainder was wooded. At the Hickory tract located in
Nash County, the entire project area consisted of
cultivated fields. At the Wesvanco tract in Vance
County, the project area consisted mainly of wooded
areas accessed by dirt roads.
Tl-ie archaeological survey consisted of shovel
testing at 100-foot intervals. Shovel tests were not
excavated in areas of standing water, in areas of
extensive disturbance, or in areas with more than 75%
ground visibility. These areas were waltzed and
subjected to a pedestrian survey.
Prior to this study no archaeological sites had
been identified in the immediate project areas. In
addition, no National Register properties were
identified in the immediate project areas. As a result of
this study, a total of 12 sites, a cemetery, and three
historic resources were located. At the Long tract,
these sites include 31 ED345, 31 ED346, 31ED347",
and a standing historic resource, none of which are
potentially eligible for the National Register, although
more documentation is recommended for the historic
resource. At the Hickon, tract, seven sites and a
standing historic resource were located and included
31 N 590, 31 N 591, 31 NS92, 31 N S93", 31 N S94",
31NS95, and 31NS96. Of these sites, 31NS90 is
recommended as potentially eligible for the National
Register of Historic Places. Prior to any construction
activities on the Hiclzory tract, we recommend that
testing be undertaken at this site. At the Wesvanco
tract, sites 31 VN258 and 31 VN260" were located, in
addition to 31VN259 a cemetery, and a group of
historic structures in various states of dilapidation. The
cemetery, site 31VN259 is the only site
recommended as potentially eligible from this tract.
Prior to any ground disturbing activities, we
recommend that further work be undertaken at this site
to determine the possibility of unmarked graves and the
true extent of the cemetery.

TABLE OF CONTENTS
•
List of Figures
List of Tables
Acl:nowledgrnent:
Introduction
Natural Environment
Physiography
Geology and Soils
Climate
florist ics
Prehistoric and Historic Overview
Previous Research
Prehistoric Ovenaew
Historic Research
Method
Field /Methods
Site Evaluation
Laboratory Analysis
Results
Introduction
Identified Sites
Sumrnarv and Recommendations
References Cited
v
vi
1
7
8
10
11
13
13
13
23
29
29
30
31
33
33
33
59
61
iii
0

LIST OF FIGURES
•
1 . Location of Long, Hickory, and Wesvanco tracts in North Carolina 2
2. Long tract in Edgecombe County 3
3. Hickory tract in Nash County 4
4. Wesvanco tract in Vance County 5
Open pine forests and mixed hardwoods in Wesvanco tract 10
6. Second growth forest covered in kudzu in Wesvanco tract 11
Cultivated fields in Hickory tract 11
8. Cultivated fields in Long tract 11
9. Pines with dense hardwood understory in Long tract 12
10. Cultural periods of North Carolina coast and piedmont 14
11, Collet "sA Compleat Map of North Carolina showing tracts 25
12. 1865 US Coast Survey Map showing three tract: 26
13. 1903 15' topographic map showing Long tract 27
14. View of modern trash in Wesvanco tract 30
15. Sites located in Long tract 34
16. Sites located in Hickory tract 35
17. Sites located in Wesvanco tract 36
18. Map of 31ED345 37
19. Map of 31ED346 38
20. Map of 31ED347" 39
21. View of Historic Resource I house on Long tract 40
22. View of Historic Resource I storage building on Long tract 40
23. View of Historic Resource I storage building on Long tract 40
24. Map of 31NS90 42
25. Map of 31NS91 45
26. Map of 31NS92 46
27. Map of 31NS93" 48
28. Map of 31NS94" 49
29. Map of 31NS95 50
30. Map of 31NS96 51
31. View of Historic Resource 1 on Hickory tract 52
32. Map of 31VN258 53
33. View of 31 VN259" 54
34. ,Flap of 31VN260" 55
35. View of Historic Resource 1, Wesvanco 56
36. View of Historic Resource 2, Wesvanco 57
37. View of Historic Resource 3, Wesvanco 58
iv
?J
•
LIST OF TABLES

1. Soils on tht Long tract
?. S oils on the Hicltorv tract
?. Soils on the Wesvanco tract
4. :artifacts recovered from 31NS90
.'artifacts recovered from 31NS93"
b. :'artifacts recovered from 31 N S94"
g
9
43
41
51
0
•
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
•
We would like to drank Mr. Bob Fronebereer of State Archaeology for iris tremendous help in
of ARCADJS Geraghh- and Miller, Incorporated for locating information on previous surveys and identified
his continuing confidence and support of Chicora resources.
Foundation.
We als-) appreciate the efforts of Site File
Registrar Ms Dolores Hall of the Forth Carolina
04i".
Finally, here at l.liicora, we would like to
thank Ms. Debi Hacker for the maps and graphics she
produced for this report.
vi

•
INTRODUCTION

The intensive archaeological investigation of
the three tracts in Edgecombe, Nasb, and Vance
Counties was conducted by Rachel Campo and Van
Steen of Chieora Foundation, Inc. for Ivlr. Bob
Frone6erger of ARCADIS Geraghty and Miller, Inc.
The Long tract is located west of the town of Rocky
Mounty in Edgecombe County (Figure 1). The
Hickory tract is located north of Rocky Mount in Nash
Count (f=igure 11. The Wesvanco tract is iocated
southeast of the town of Henderson in Vance Counh,
(Figure 1). This work was undertaken in order to
record archaeological sites and histonc resources
present on these tracts.
The Long tract is situated between NC State
Highways 64 and 64A, to the west of SR 1225
(Kings6oro Road) and south of Tar River (Figure').
The eastern portion of the tract, adjacent to SSR
1225, consisted of cultivated and fallow fields, while the
remainder of the tract, accessed by dirt roads, consisted
of mixed hardwoods and pines. This tract was relatively
flat, with no areas of high elevation. A total of three
sites (31ED345, 31ED346, and 31ED347") and a
standing historic resource were identified in Long tract.
Further documentation is recommended for the
historic resource. No further work is recommended for
the other three sites.
'176e Hickory tract is located east of Interstate
95, north of state highway 44/33, south of Fishing
Creek, and west of Beaverdam Swamp (Figure 3). This
tract consisted entirely of cultivated fields. The entire
tract had at least 75% surface visibility. A few small
streams ran through the tract. The tract had a few
small bills and rises, one of which produced a large
prehistoric site. This site, 31NS90, is recommended
as potentially eligible. Six other sites, (31.NS91,
31NS92, 31NS93 3]NS94", 31NS95, and
31NS96) and one standing historic resource were
identified, with no further management wort:
recommended for these sites.
-fbe Wesvanco tract is ocated east of Highway
I Bypass, west of State Highway 39, and north of
Martin Creek (Figure 4). The majority of the tract was
heavily wooded, with very few areas of high elevation.
The tract was accessed by a numner of small, overgrown
dirt roads. Three sites (31VN258, 31VN259 and
31 VN260"), including a cemetery, and three historic
resources in various stages of dilapidation were
identified in the Wesvanco tract. Of these, only the
cemetery is recommended as potentially eligible. No
further management work is recommended for the
other sites in this tract.
The proposed worn .,n these sites has the
potential to damage or even destroy archaeological sites
in the immediate vicinity. For this reason, we
recommend that further work be done at two of the
tracts prior to any ground disturbing activities.
We were requested by .'y1r. Bob Frone6ergerof
ARCADIS Geraghty and Miller, Inc. to submit a cost
proposal for intensive level sur.,eys of the project areas
on June 16, 1999. This proposal, submitted on June
21, 1999, was approved on ) une 23, 1999. These
investigations incorporated a review of the site files at
the North Carolina Office o: State Archaeology by
Rachel Campo on June 24, 1999. No previously
recorded sites were identified i:. the project areas.
The survey, which was designed to identify
prehistoric or historic resources within the project areas,
was conducted July 6-13 and required a total of 150
person hours to complete the <urvey.
C7
•
0

•

INTRODUCTION
?yc=Yb \ '' ?
???
/ Np
M1
7p .
p ?
Y
? r?r/' "mil r

O
e f{ ?!! 11
as
°

\
8M
t 6°°
1
V
LONG TRA
CT
HWY 64 >o

n \
LINE
s y
G ?/
I
l
KJ

a\' Aoftocthi
chi
'
33L ?? r
.
?' J as s
1 7,
. ---

° ± c Cem::

° 1000 0 1000 7000 3000 4000 5000 6000 7000 FEET rte,

Figure 2. View of Long tract (base map is USGS Hartsease 1981, 1:24,000).
3
0
•
0
INTENSIVE ARCHAEOLOGICAL SURVEY OF THREE TRACTS IN NORTH CAROLINA
130' ¦ L/
n x//3
• s ?.. -\5 e„ x//e
. ?p o
1 x/2?
O O
JQ j0~ , \
) U ; ?//0 r
_fS
0
Y :;Hun a -?^•? ??pO
, • X10
7
?? 1 J 133X
e
ee
?•? •°naa• i ?-` e4 fem. i/?Q? I O
4
X 38 %30
r!Q ,/.-. ??.•=:?x? x126 /
?" pI T A,a'K? E R S : `
M '
Hicko r
'is
SM 13
==•pa . y irs ? ry b
r 0 X"' a , HICKORY TRACT C
44
sbe.. - •
Cb -P
o • • ? cJ? ? s
120
1000 0 1000 2000 8000 4000 6000 600o 7000 FEET r
Figure 3. View of Hickory tract (base map is USGS Ringwood 1963, 1:24,000).
4

1?1
•
INURODUMON
4. View of Wesvanco tract (base map is USGS Henderson 1970PR82, 1:
0

NATURAL ENVIRONMENT
•
PhysiOOTanhy
The three project tracts are situated in two
distinctly different pbysiographic regions of North
Carolina (Figure 1).
The Long tract is situated in Edgecombe
County, immediately east of Rocky Mount, south of
the Tar River (Figure 2). The northern boundary of the
site is US 64, while the eastern edge is defined by NC
Secondary Road 1225 which runs south to Kingsboro.
The parcel is roughly bounded to the south by Walnut
Creek drainage. The area today, although surrounded
by agricultural fields, is heavily wooded.
Edgecombe County is in the eastern part of
North Carolina, entirely within the coastal plain. It is
roughly rectilinear in shapc, oriented northeast-
southwest and divided by the Tar River, which flows
southerly. Edgecombe, containing about 511 square
miles, is bounded to the north by Halifax, to the west
by Nash, to the south by Wilson and Pitt counties, and
on the east by Martin County.
The Hickory tract is located at the extreme
northern edge of Nash county, bounded to the west and
northwest by-farm roads and to the south by NC 44.
The eastern boundary generally follows the edge of
Beaverdam Swamp (Figure 3). This parcel is situated in
a rural section of the county and the surrounding land
is almost entirely agricultural.
Nash County is immediately northwest of
Edgecombe County, separated by the Tar River.
Although the county itself is on the phvsiographic
bound between the coastal plain to the southeast and
the piedmont to the northwest, the survey tract is
situated in a area of coastal plain topography and soils.
Nash, which includes 542 square miles, is drained by
Fishing Creek (which forms its northern boundary with
Halifax County), Swift Creek (which flows east-west
through the north central portion of the county), and
the Tar River (which separates Nash from Edgecombe).
To the west is Franklin County, to the southwest is
Johnston County, and to south is Wilson County.
The Wesvanco tract is situated in Vance
County, southeast of Henderson. It is bordered to the
west by US 1 and to the south by the slope toward
Martin Creek. Framing the tract to the north is the
intersection of US 1 and NC Secondary Road 1148
(Figure 4). Opposite the tract, on the west side of US
1 is existing industrial development, while the
surrounding area is mixed agricultural and residential.
Vance County is situated entirely within the
piedmont. It is rectangular in shape, oriented north-
south, and is situated in the north-central part of
North Carolina, on the Virginia border. Vance
contains 249 square miles and is bordered to the west
by Granville County, to the east by Warren, and to the
south and southeast by Franklin County. One of the
major drainages in the county was dammed for the
creation of John H. Kerr Reservoir (originally the
Buggs Island Reservoir) in 1944. The Tar River forms
the boundary between Vance and Franklin counties.
The coastal plain is an area characterized by
unconsolidated soils of sand, silt, and clav. The
typically flat topography has evolved through a long
series of geologic changes including uplifts and erosion.
The six terraces formed b., erosion where further
defined by sea level changes during the Pleistocene
(Gale et al. 1986:116). The resulting parallel drainage
svstem, which is to be expected on uniform, gentle
slopes, are often slow moving, forming large swamp and
floodplain areas. A good example of this is the Tar
River.
Edgecombe County has the topography typical
of the Inner Coastal Plain. Over 80% of the county is
flat, with grades of less than 2%. Where slopes are

•
•
INTENSIVE ARCRAEOLOGICAL SURVEY OF THREE TRACTS IN NORTH CAROLINA
present they are usually associated a waterway and often
with its resulting erosion. The Long tract also typifies
this area, consisting of a very level plain with a very
slight slope at its eastern and southern edges, as it
begins to drop into Walnut Creek. Elevations are about
110 feet above mean sea level (AM SL), although in the
immediately vicinity they range down to about 65 feet
AMMSL.
As previously indicated, Nash County includes
both areas of coastal plain and piedmont, with much of
the county consisting of the fall line - an area of
transition between the old crystalline rocks of the
piedmont and the recent, flat sediments of the coastal
plain. The fall line is marked by rapids and falls in the
rivers, marking the extent of inland navigation. It is
also marked by a series of urban centers attracted to the
zone by readily available water power and the natural
termination of river traffic (Gale et al. 1986:8).
The Hickory tract, clearly dominated by the
coastal plain, is level with elevations of about 124 to
130 feet AM SL. The minor slope present is directed to
the small drainage running through the tract and to
Beaverdam Swamp.
al. 1986:146). The area, geologically, exhibits greater
diversity, but includes part of the Carolina Slate Belt
and the range of lithic materials attractive to early
occupants of the region.
Geology and Soils
The coastal plain's parent materials are marine
or fluvial deposits which consist of varying amounts of
sand, silts, and clays. The various geologic formations
are all overlaid by a relatively thin mantle of
undifferentiated light-colored sands and gravels with
clay layers of Pleio-Pleistocene age. These, in turn, are
recognized as a series of terraces.
The coastal plain is a rather impoverished area
for lithic resources. However, this should not imply that
lithics are absent, only that they are usually scarce. For
example, there are often river pebbles of relatively high
quality quartz found in gravel bars and metavolcanic
rock does occasionally outcrop in the upper coastal
Table 1.
Soils on the Long Tract, Edgecombe County
The piedmont, located between the mountain
and coastal plain regions, is an area of dendritic
drainage and red clay. Robertson (1960:61) identifies
the area as a peneplain, dissected by moderately swift
streams flowing south or southwest. The name
"piedmont" means "foot of the mountains," which
describes the general topography: a rolling eroded
plateau with rounded hills and low ridges (Gale et al.
1986:146). Vance County is gently sloping to rolling
and, in many areas, has fairly broad ridges. In contrast
to the other survey tracts, the W esvanco site is more
steeply sloped, tending southward toward Martin Creek.
Elevations ranging from 500 feet AMSL at the
northern edge to about 450 feet AM SL at the southern
end.
Vance is classified by Gades and his colleagues
as within the Piedmont Lowlands - "an area of down-
faulted basins filled with younger, unaltered
sedimentary rocks and displaying more fully dissected
surface terrain than the Piedmont Uplands" (Gale et

Soil Series % of
Survey Area
Goldsboro fine sandy loam, 0-2% 6.4
Lynchburg fine sandy loam 5.8
Norfolk loamy sand 43.3
Rains fine sandy loam 26.0
Wagram loamy sand 18.5
plain or fall line. In addition, even greater numbers of
resources are available in the Slate Belt, just within the
adjacent piedmont.
The Long survey tract includes five soil types,
shown in Table 1. Of these the Lynch and Rains soils,
accounting for nearly a third of the tract, are poorly
drained and as a result are usually interpreted to have a
low potential for the identification of prehistoric or
historic sites. Both the Lynchburg and Rains soils are
typically found in smooth interstream areas and shallow
depressions. The Lynchburg soils have generaUy dark A
r-?
•
•
NATURAL ENVIRONMENT
or Ali horizons overlying a light yellowish brown
subsoil, while the Rains soils are more reduced,
exhibiting gray A and B horizons to depths of several
feet (Goodwin 1979).
The remainder of the soils are moderately to
well drained, typically found on higher elevations.
Profiles typically exhibit brown A or Ap horizons over
yellowish brown or brownish yellow subsoils.
The Hickory tract contains five different soil
series, including the Goldsboro, Norfolk, and Rains
series identified in the Long tract (Table 2). In this
Table 2.
Soils on the Hickory Tract, Nash County
% of
Soil Series Survey Area
Goldsboro fine sandy loam, 0-2% 28.6
Norfolk loamy sand, 0-2% 29.9
Norfolk loamy sand, 2-6% 5.8
Rains fine sandy loam 33.3
Tomotley fine sandy loam 2.4
survey tract about a third of the area is covered with
poorly drained soils, dominated by the Rains series. The
Tomotley soils, however, have very similar reduced A
and B horizons. It is unlikely that prehistoric or
historic sites will be encountered on these poorly
drained soils. Indicative of its proximity to the
piedmont, there are a few soils on the tract which have
slopes ranging up to 6%, but they are in the minority
(Allison 1989).
As previously mentioned, the piedmont's
landscape has a rolling surface of gentle to steep slopes.
Each peneplain is cut or bounded by valleys of even
steeper slopes which often have a depth of several
hundred feet. This landscape is most noticeable in the
interior, away from the Fall Line edge, where the effects
of increased erosion are clearer. As you move toward
the mountainous Blue Ridge. peneplain development
becomes more incomplete and monadnocks more
abundant.
Perhaps the most significant feature of the
piedmont's geology is its effect on prehistoric lithic
technology. Quartz is the most abundant material,
being found in the Kings Mountain formation and also
readily available as veins in the crystalline gneisses and
schists which underlie (and yield through
decomposition) the red clays of the nearby piedmont
uplands. The quartz, however, is harder than the
associated rocks and decomposes more slowly than the
surrounding matrix. As a result, vein quartz often
appears on the surface or very near to the surface. The
metavolcanics, such as argillite and rhyolite, are widely
available from localized outcroppings of the Carolina
Slate Belt, west of the project area. Of particular
importance are the cryptocrystalline deposits which
supply the best materials for knapping. Although other
materials, such as chalcedony and even chert, are
occasionally found as tools in this section of the North
Carolina Piedmont, these materials are extra-local,
coming from either nearby counties or, in the case of
chert, from either Tennessee or western North
Carolina.
The Wesvanco project area consists of only
four defined soil series, including the Appling-Urban
Land Complex; Appling sandy loam 2-8% slopes; Cecil
sandy clay loam 2-8% slopes, eroded; and Durham
Table 3.
Soils on the Wesvanco Tract, Vance County
% of
Soil Series Survey Area
Appling-Urban Land Complex, 6-10% 6.6
Appling sandy loam, 2-8% 60.6
Cecil sandy clay loam, 2-8% 13.1
Durham loamy sand, 1-6% 19.7
loamy sand 1-6% slopes (Table 3). These soils exhibit
considerable variability, but are generally well drained,
gently sloping to moderately steep soils formed from
crystalline rocks. The Appling soils have a brown Ap
horizon resting on a yellowish-brown clay loam, while
the Cecil soils are the "typical" red clays of the
Piedmont uplands and, in the survey area, are found
9
0
•
•
INTFNSWE ARCHAEOLOGICAL SURVEY OF THREE TRACTS IN NORTH CAROLINA
both partially intact and eroded (jtimpson et a]. 1980)
Although only about 13% of the soils in the
project area are classified by the Sod Conservation
Service as eroded, with the loss of all of the original A
horizon and, in many cases, some of the underlying $
horizon, piedmont soil erosion has been a common
problem. The causes can be traced to poor farming
practices, such as shallow plowing and limited crop
rotation, and the conversion of rural areas to residential
subdivisions, shopping malls, industrial complexes and
highway systems (Gale et al. 1986:149). Areas of
exposed red clay or gullies were noted in several areas,
demonstrating the fragile nature of the piedmont.
\lance County is part of what Trimble (1974)
calls the New Tobacco Planting Area. He observes that
the area generally had a fairly high erosive land use
history which peaked in the late nineteenth century. In
spite of this he projects that soil loss was likely 0.5 foot
or less.
By the time of Great Depression, the Soil
Conservation Service characterized much of
southeastern Vance County, including the survey area,
as exhibiting "moderate"
moderate sheet erosion." To the
northwest, where slopes were steeper, erosion was
significantly worse (Lee 1934).
west of the county block cold air masses from the
northwest, and elevations in the piedmont area, ranging
from 650 feet to 1,500 feet AMSL, help maintain
relatively mild temperatures, with mild, short winters
and warm summers. Moving to the coastal plain the
winters still tend to be mild, but the summers are
typically hot and humid because of moist maritime air.
In the piedmont, in the vicinity of the vicinity
of Vance County, July temperatures, generally the
warmest of the year, average between 66 and 89° F,
while January temperatures, generally the coldest of the
year, average about 28-51"F. The area is also
characterized by a humid climate with abundant
rainfall, averaging about 45 inches annually. The
growing season for most crops is during the months of
April through September, when 54% of the annual
rainfall occurs.
In terms of human comfort, the inner coastal
plain doesn't exhibit conditions that are too different
from those in the piedmont. Around Edgecomhe and
Nash counties the temperatures average about 78°F in
the summer and 41 °F in the winter. Rainfall averages
between 45 and 48 inches locally, with about 56%
occurring during the growing season.
This suggests that the
archaeological potential of the
tract, most especially in those
areas of steeper slopes or the Cecil
soils, may be affected by previous
erosional damage. This situation
is consistent with the findings of
the shovel tests. Although some
areas were identified laclzing an A
horizon, it was intact over most
of the tract.
Climate
Elevation and geography
both affect the climate of the
three study areas. The
Appalachian Mountains to the
10

•
NATURAL ENVIRONMENT
Floristics
represent an early
on midslopes and even several of
the ridgetops, the understory is
not dramatic (Figure 5). In
several areas of abandoned
cultivated land, however, pine
forests have developed with a
dense understory of small
hardwoods and herbaceous
vegetation, most especially kudzu
(Figure 6).
The piedmont is
characterized by the dominance of
a pine forest cover, due primarily
to three centuries of human land
use in the region (Gale et al.
1986:8). Oaks, hickories, and
dogwoods also characterize the
forests of the piedmont (State
board of Agriculture 1896:37).
Oak-pine forests account for
most of the forest acreage in the
area, although the vegetation has
been dramatically altered from the
original or natural potential
vegetation prior to the
intervention of European settlers.
Today, loblolly-shordeaf pine
forests are abundant and include
red oak, white oak, gum, hickory
and yellow-poplar trees.
The bulk of the Wesvanco survey tract is
forested, with pine and oak dominating. Where the
oak-pine or oak-hickory forests are developed, such as
In the coastal plain the
vegetation is based primarily on
topograpluc location. Upland
areas are frequently in pine, often
found associated with soils of low
fertility, high acidity, and
excessive drainage. Most often
such areas have been subjected to
extensive disturbance, often
agricultural, and the pines
stage of revegetation. Areas of
hardwood may exist with oaks, maples, sweetgum, black
gum, and mockernut hickory. More common, however,
are mixed forests, containing both pines and
11
0
0
•
_ UNTENSIVE ARCHAEOLOGICAL. SURVEY OF THREE TRACTS IN NORTH CAROLINA
hardwoods. On slopes overlooking swamps beech-oak-
hickory forests occur with understories such as redbud,
dogwood, grape, and pawpaw - creating an attractive
edge area for browsers such as deer. In the lowlands are
more mesic species, such as cypress, gum, sycamore,
water hickory, lowland oaks, soft
maples, and willows.
Many areas, however,
have been dramatically changed
by cultivation, with few natural
species still being found on a
regular basis. This is certainly the
case at the Hickory tract in Nash
County where virtually all of the
study area is currently planted in
row crops (Figure 7).
A very similar situation
is present at the Long tract in
Edgecombe county, where the
survey area includes cultivated
lands (Figure 8) and fallow fields.
In addition, however, significant
portions of the tract include pine
with a dense hardwood understorv
12
(Figure 9).
9• Pine with dense hardwood understory on the Long tract in
/ 1
•
BACKGROUND RESEARCH
C7
Previous Research
There are a number of previous cultural
resource management reports which itemize much of
the research conducted in Vance, Nash and Edgecombe
counties (see, for example, Lautzenheiser et al. 1996
and Holm et al. 1999 for Vance and Nash counties
respectively). Like elsewhere in North Carolina there
has been a mix of compliance studies, covering relatively
small areas, and longer-term research. In fact, research
in this northeastern comer of North Carolina, while
begun by Joffre Coe and his student, Stanley South, on
the basis of the Roanoke Rapids research in the 1950s
(South 1959 and Coe 1964), for many years afterward
was dominated by David Phelps and his students at East
Carolina University (for a synopsis see Phelps 1983).
Perhaps one of the more significant projects
conducted in Nash County is Phelps' work at the
Thorpe site, which produced materials ranging from the
Paleoindian through Woodland (Phelps 1980).
Although evidence of some previously identified wares
(such as the Vincent series) was found, the site was
dominated by what Phelps called Cashie - the
progenitor of the historic Tuscarora wares.
Later work in the Deep Creek reservoir of
adjacent Edgecombe County, and specifically at the
Parker Site, produced a range of pottery, including what
is thought to represent some very early fiber-tempered
(reflecting a southern intrusion) and steatite-tempered
(reflecting a northern intrusion) wares (Phelps 1981).
In spite of the uniqueness of these early potteries, the
site was probably more significant for its contribution
toward the definition of the Early Woodland Deep
Creek pottery series.
Perhaps the most significant research in Vance
County, certainly the most extensive, was undertaken in
anticipation of the John H. Kerr Dam and Reservoir. A
range of Archaic and Woodland sites were found in both
North Carolina and Virginia with the bulk easily fitting
into the pre-existing chronology established by Coe and
his colleagues for the piedmont region (White 1979)
These investigations incorporated a review of
the files at the North Carolina Office of State
Archaeology. No previously recorded sites were found
within or immediately adjacent to any of the project
boundaries.
Prehistoric Overview
Overviews for North Carolina's prehistory,
while of differing lengths and complexity, are available
in virtually every compliance report prepared. There are,
in addition, some "classic" sources well worth attention,
such as Joffre Coe's Formative Cukures (Coe 1964), as
well as some new general overviews (such as the one
previously mentioned by Phelps 119831 for the coastal
plain and another by Ward 119831 for the piedmont).
These can be supplemented with a broad range of theses
and dissertations produced by students of North
Carolina's colleges and universities. Also extremely
helpful, perhaps even essential, are a handful of recent
local synthetic statements, such as that offered by
Sassaman and Anderson (1994) for the Middle and
Late Archaic. Only a few of the many sources are
included in this study, but they should be adequate to
give the reader a "feel" for the area and help establish a
context for the various sites identified in the study area.
Figure 10 offers a generalized view of North Caroline's
cultural periods.
In the Carolina Piedmont, lithic scatters are
the most common type of prehistoric site encountered.
Goodyear et al. (1979:131-145) found that sites
containing lithic scatters located in the inter-riverine
Piedmont were geographically extensive and exhibited
little artifact diversity. These sites have been interpreted
as:
limited or specialized activity sites
which represent resource exploitation
13
•

INTENSIVE ARCHAEOLOGICAL SURVEY OF THREE TRACTS IN NORTH CAROLINA
Regkml Phases
Dates Period Sub- NORTH COASTAL SOUTH COASTAL CENTRAL PIEDMONT
Period
1715 _ SLY Tide Wafer Coostd Plain Woccornaw 7 Caraway
Co
1650 nk I 7uscaroro
I
Dan I
LATE Coington I Cost*
I Oak fskond River I Pee Dee
I
800
o uwhorne

aD. MIDDLE Mount PleasoM Cape Fear
B.C. Hanover Yadkin
300 3

EARt.Y Deep Creek New River Bodin
1000
WomY Creek
LATE Sfofnas
2000
Sovo nch Over
3000 Holm

MIDDLE Guilford
Morrow Mountoin
U Story
f5000 z
U
Q
KA
8000
EARLY Pdmer
10.000 -- --- -------------- Hordoway-------------
0
o
J Horck way - Dalton
a 2
12000 - aovis
Figure 10. A generalized cultural sequence for the North Carolina coast and piedmont (partially adapted from Coe
1964:Figure 116 and Phelps 1983: Figure 2).
14

•
•
BACKGROUND RESEARCH
or other distinct functions. Nearly all
investigators working in the
Piedmont have related these sites to
activities involving hunting, nut
gathering, and procuring of lithic raw
materials (Canouts and Goodyear
1985:185).
diversity present. Sites from the sandhills through the
tidewater need to explored to understand the impact of
both topography and the environment. And although
not specifically mentioned by Phelps, it seems that an
ancillary research topic should be to improve our
understanding of the plethora of pottery typologies that
dominate the Carolina coastal plain.
Although the vast majority of these sites are located in
eroded areas and exhibit little to no subsurface integrity,
Canouts and Goodyear (1985) argue that they have
analytical value. This value lies in their horizontal
rather than vertical dimensions. They argue that:
future investigators of upland sites
must effect broad-scale spatial
analyses comparable to the temporal
analyses effected through excavation
of deeply stratified sites. Both
endeavors are necessary, and neither
is sufficient for the total
understanding of Piedmont
prehistory' (Canouts and Goodyear
1985: 193).
One observation that Canouts and Goodyear
(1985) made is that lithic raw material ratios change
through time. For instance, at the Gregg Shoals site in
Elbert County, Georgia, the Early Archaic assemblage
reflects greater use of non-local cryptocrystalline
materials and the Late Archaic, greater use of non-
quartz local material (see Tippitt and Marquardt 1981).
Turning to the coastal plain Phelps (1983:50)
provides an overview of the issues which he feels were
significant there nearly two decades ago. Curiously,
most are still as important today. They include a better
understanding of Paleoindian site distribution,
excavation of single component Archaic sites,
exploration of the sites that span the Archaic-Woodland
transition, study of the changes in settlement and
subsistence patterns at Early and Middle Woodland
sites, and excavation of sites that provide a greater range
of activities for each phase.
This last topis seems of special concern,
although it is simple - sites, and lots of them, need to
be examined in order to understand the range of
Paleoindian Period
The Paleoindian Period, most commonly dated
from about 12,000 to 10,000 B.P., is evidenced by
basally thinned, side-notch projectile points; fluted,
lancelot projectile points; side scrapers; end scrapers;
and drills (Coe 1964; Michie 1977; Williams 1965).
Oliver (1981, 1985) has proposed to extend the
Paleoindian dating in the North Carolina Piedmont to
perhaps as early as 14,000 B.P., incorporating the
Hardaway Side-Notched and Palmer Corner-Notched
types, usually accepted as Early Archaic, as
representatives of the terminal phase. This view, verbally
suggested by Coe for a number of years, has
considerable technological appeal.' Oliver suggests a
continuity from the Hardaway Blarle through the
Hardaway-Dalton to the Hardaway Side-Notched,
eventually to the Palmer Side-Notched (Oliver
1985:199-200). While convincingly argued, this
approach is not universally accepted.
The Paleoindian occupation, while widespread,
does not appear to have been intensive. Artifacts are
most frequently found along major river drainages,
which Miclrie interprets to support the concept of an
economy "oriented toward the exploitation of now
extinct mega-fauna" (Michie 1977:124). Survey data
for Paleoindian tool, most notably fluted points, is
rather dated for North Carolina (Brennan 1982; Peck
i Whihe never discussed by Coe at length, he did
observe that many of the Hardaway points, especially from the
lowest contexts, had facial fluting or thinning winch, "in cases
where the side-notches or basal portions were missing, .. .
could be mistaken for fluted points of the Paleo-Indian
period" (Coe 1964:64). While not an especially strong
statement, it does reveal the formation of the concept.
Further insight is offered by Wards (1983:63) all too brief
comments on the more recent investigations at the Hardaway
site (see also Daniel 1992).
15
•
•
INTENSIVE ARCHAEOLOGICAL SURVEY OF THREE TRACTS IN NORTH CAROLINA
1988: Perkinson 1971, 1973; cf. Anderson 1990). In
spite of this, the distribution offered by Anderson
(1992b:Figure 5.1) reveals a rather general, and
widespread, occurrence throughout the region.
Distinctive projectile points may include
lancoelates such as Clovis, Dalton, perhaps the
Hardaway, and Big Sandy (Coe 1964; Phelps 1983;
Oliver 1985). A temporal sequence of Paleoindian
projectile points was proposed by Williams (1965:24-
51), but according to Phelps (1983:18) there is little
stratigraphic or chronometric evidence for it. While this
is certainly true, a number of authors, such as Anderson
(1992a) and Oliver (1985) have assembled impressive
data sets. We are inclined to believe that while often not
cond`usively proven by stratigraphic excavations (and
such proof may be an unreasonable expectation), there
is a large body of circumstantial evidence. The weight of
this evidence tends to provide considerable support.
Unfortunately, relatively little is }mown about
Paleoindian subsistence strategies, settlement systems,
or social organization (see, however, Anderson 1992b
for an excellent overview and synthesis of what is
known). Generally, archaeologists agree that the
Paleoindian groups were at a band level of society (see
Service 1966), were nomadic, and were both hunters
and foragers. While population density, based on
isolated finds, is thought to have been low, Walthall
suggests that toward the end of the period, "there was an
increase in population density and in territoriality and
that a number of new resource areas were beginning to
be exploited" (Walthall 1980:30).
Archaic Period
The Archaic Period, which dates from 10,000
to 3,000 B.P.Z, does not form a sharp break with the
z The terminal point for the Archaic is no clearer
than that for the Paleoindiaa and many researchers suggest a
terminal date of 4,000 B.P. rather tfiaa 3,000 B.P. There is
also the question of whether ceramics, such as the fiber-
tempered Stallings wars, will be included as Archaic, or will
be included with the Woodland. Oliver, for example, argues
that the inclusion of ceramics with Late Archaic attributes
"complicates and confuses classification and interpretation
needlessly" (Oliver 1981:20). He comments that according to
Paleoindian Period, but is a slow transition
characterized by a modern climate and an increase in
the diversity of material culture. Associated with this is
a reliance on a broad spectrum of small mammals,
although the white tailed deer was likely the most
commonly exploited animal. Archaic period
assemblages, exemplified by comer-notched and broad-
stemmed projectile points, are fairly common, perhaps
because the swamps and drainages offered especially
attractive eeotones.
Some researchers (see for example, Ward
1983:65) suggest that there was a noticeable population
increase from the Paleoindian into the Early Archaic.
This has tentatively been associated with a greater
emphasis on foraging. Diagnostic Early Archaic
artifacts include the Kirle Corner Notched point. As
previously discussed, Palmer points may be included
with either the Paleoindian or Archaic period,
depending on theoretical perspective. As the climate
became hotter and drier than the previous Paleoindian
period, resulting in vegetational changes, it also
affected settlement patterning as evidenced by a long-
term Kirk phase midden deposit at the Hardaway site
(Coe 1964:60). This is believed to have been the result
of a change in subsistence strategies.
Settlements during the Early Archaic suggest
the presence of a few, very large, and apparently
intensively occupied, sites which can best be considered
base camps. Hardaway might be one such site. In
addition, there were numerous small sites which
produced only a few artifacts - these are the "network
of tracks" mentioned by Ward (1963:65). The base
camps produce a wide range of artifact types and raw
the original definition of the Archaic, it "represents a
prtceramic horizon" and that "the presence of ceramics
provides a convenient marker for separation of the Archaic
and Woodland periods (Oliver 1981.21). Other would
counter that such an approach ignores cultural continuity and
forces an artificial, and perhaps unrealistic, separation.
Sassaman and Anderson (1994:38-44), for example, include
Stallings and Thom's Creelr wares in their discussion of "Late
Archaic Pottery." While this issue has been of considerable
importance along the Carolina and Georgia coasts, it has
never affected the Piedmont, which seems to have embraced
pottery far later, well into the conventional Woodland period.
16
•
•
BACKGROUND RESEARCH
materials- which has suggested to many researcher; long-
term, perhaps seasonal or multi-seasonal, occupation. In
contrast, the smaller sites are thought of as special
purpose or foraging sites (see Ward 1983:67).
likelihood variations on these two
themes probably eidsted in different
regions at different times throughout
the Archaic period (Ward 1983:69).
Middle Archaic (8,000 to 6,000 B.P.)
diagnostic artifacts include Morrow Mountain,
Guilford, Stanly and Halifax projectile points. Phelps
(1983:25) also notes that the gradual increase from
Paleoindian to Archaic in the Coastal Plain seems to
peak during the Middle Archaic Morrow Mountain
phase. Much of our best information on the Middle
Archaic comes from sites investigated west of the
Appalachian Mountains, such as the work by Jeff
Chapman and his students in the little Tennessee River
Valley (for a general overview see Chapman 1977,
1985., 19856). There is good evidence that Middle
Archaic lithic technologies changed dramatically. End
scrapers, at times associated with Paleoindian traditions,
are discontinued, raw materials tend to reflect the
greater use of locally available materials, and mortars are
initially introduced. Associated with these technological
changes there seem to also be some significant cultural
modifications. Prepared burials begin to more
commonly occur and storage pits are identified. The
work at Middle Archaic river valley sites, with their
evidence of a diverse floral and faunal subsistence base,
seems to stand in stark contrast to Caldwell's Middle
Archaic "Old Quartz Industry" of Georgia and the
Carolinas, where axes, choppers, and ground and
polished stone tools are very rare.
The available information has resulted in a
variety of competing settlement models. Some argue for
increased sedentism and a reduction of mobility (see
Goodyear et al. 1979:111). Ward argues that the most
appropriate model is one which includes relatively stable
and sedentary hunters and gatherers "primarily adapted
to the varied and rich resource base offered by the major
alluvial valleys" (Ward 1983:69). While he recognizes
the presence of "inter-riverine" sites, be discounts
explanations which focus on seasonal rounds, suggesting
"alternative explanations ... lincluding] a wide range of
adaptive responses." Most importantly, he notes that:
the seasonal transhumance model
and the sedentary model are opposite
ends of a continuum, and in all
others suggest increased mobility during the
Archaic (see Cable 1982), Sassaman (1983) has
suggested that the Morrow Mountain phase people had
a great deal of residential mobility, based on the variety
of environmental zones they are found in and the lack
of site diversity. The high level of mobility, coupled with
the rapid replacement of these points, may help explain
the seemingly large numbers of sites with Middle
Archaic assemblages. Curiously, the later Guilford
phase sites are not as widely distributed, perhaps
suggesting that only certain micro-environments were
used (cf. Ward (1983:68-691 who'would likely reject
the notion that substantially different environmental
zones are, in fact, represented).
Recently Abbott et al. (1995) argue for a
combination of these models, noting that the almost
certain increase in population levels probably resulted in
a contraction of local territories. With small territories
there would have been significantly greater pressure to
successfully exploit the limited resources by more
frequent movement of camps. They discount the idea
that these territories could }rave been exploited from a
single base camp without horticultural technology.
Abbott and his colleagues conclude, "increased
residential mobility under such conditions may in fact
represent a common stage in the development of
sedentism" (Abbott et al. 1995:9).
From excavations at a Sandhills site in
Chesterfield County, South Carolina, Gunn and his
colleague (Gunn and Wilson 1993) offer an alternative
model for Middle Archaic settlement. He accepts that
the uplands were desiccated from global warming, but
rather than limiting occupation, this environmental
change made the area more attractive for residential
base camps. Gunn and Wilson suggest that the open, or
fringe, habitat of the upland margins would have been
attractive to a wide variety of plant and animal species.
Another point of some controversy is the idea
that the groups responsible for the Middle Archaic
Morrow Mountain and Guilford points were intrusive
17
LJ
•
INTENSIVE ARCHAEOLOGICAL SURVEY OF THREE TRACTS IN NORTH CAROLINA
("without any background" in Cot's words) into the
North Carolina Piedmont, from the west, and were
contemporaneous with the groups producing Stanly
points (Coe 1964:122-123; Phelps 1983:23). Phelps,
building on Coe, refers to the Morrow Mountain and
Guilford as the "Western Intrusive horizon." Sassaman
(1995) has recently proposed a scenario for the Morrow
Mountain groups which would support this west-to-east
time-transgressive process. Abbott and his colleagues,
perhaps unaware of Sassaman's data, dismiss the
concept, commenting that the shear distribution and
number of these points "makes this position wholly
untenable" (Abbott et al. 1995:9).
The Late Archaic, usually dated from 6,000 to
3,000 or 4,000 B.P., is characterized by the
appearance of large, square stemmed Savannah River
projectile points (Coe 1964). These people continued to
intensively exploit the uplands much like earlier Archaic
groups within North Carolina, the hull, of our data for
this period comes from the Uwharrie region.
One of the more debated issues of the Late
Archaic is the typology of the Savannah River Stemmed
and its various diminutive forms. Oliver, refining Coe's
(1964) origins) Savannah River Stemmed type and a
small variant from Garton (South 1959:153-157),
developed a complete sequence of stemmed points that
decrease uniformly in size through time (Oliver 1981,
1985). Specifically, he sees the progression from
Savannah River Stemmed to Small Savannah River
Stemmed to Gvpsy Stemmed to Swannanoa from about
5,000 B.P. to about 1,500 B.P. He also notes that the
latter two forms are associated with Woodland pottery.
This reconstruction is still debated with a
number of archaeologists expressing concern with what
they see as typological overlap and ambiguity. They
point to a dearth of radiocarbon dates and good
excavation contexts yet, at the same time they express
concern with the application of this typology outside the
North Carolina Piedmont (see, for a synopsis,
Sassaman and Anderson 1990:158-162, 1994:35).
In addition to the presenoe of Savannah River
points, the Late Archaic also witnessed the introduction
of steatite vessels (see Coe 1964:112-113; Sassaman
1993), polished and pecked stone artifacts, and grinding
stones. Some also include the introduction of fiber-
tempered pottery about 4000 B.P. in the Late Archaic
(for a discussion see Sassaman and Anderson 1994:38.
44). This innovation is of special importance along the
Georgia and South Carolina coasts, but seems to have
had only minimal impact in North Carolina.
Then is evidence that during the Late Archaic
the climate began to approximate modern climatic
conditions. Rainfall increased resulting in a more lush
vegetation pattern. The pollen record indicates an
increase in pine which reduced the oak-hickory nut
masts which previously were so widespread. This change
probably affected settlement patterning sinoe nut masts
were now more isolated and concentrated. From
research in the Savannah River valley near Aiken,
South Carolina, Sassaman has found considerable
diversity in Iate Archaic site types with sites occurring
in virtually every upland environmental zone. He
suggests that this more complex settlement pattern
evolved from an increasingly complex socio-economic
system. While it is unlikely that this model can be
simply transferred to the Piedmont of North Carolina
without an extensive review of site data and micro-
environmental data, it does demonstrate one approach
to understanding the transition from Archaic to
Woodland.
Woodland Period in the Piedmont
As previously discussed, there are those who
see the Woodland beginning with the introduction of
pottery suggestive of influences from northern cultures.
In the Piedmont, the Early woodland is marked by a
pottery type defined by Coe (1964:27-29) as Badin.3
This pottery is identified as having very fine sand in the
paste with an occasional pebble.` Coe identified cord-
3 The ceramics suggest clear regional differences
during the 'Wood6nd which seem to only be magnified during
the later phases. Ward (1983:71), for example, notes that
then "marked distinctions" between the pottery from the
Buggs Island and Garton Reservoirs and that from the south-
central Piedmont.
' Coe, in fact, notes that the Bailin paste is very
similar to that which characterizes Thom's Creek (Coe
1995:154).
18
0
•
0
BACKGROUND RESEARCH
marked, fabric-marked, net-impressed, and plain surface
finishes. Beyond this pottery little more is }mown about
the makers of the Badin wares than is known about
those who made New River wares.
The dominant Middle Woodland ceramic type
is typically identified as the Yadkin series. Characterized
by a crushed quartz temper, the pottery includes surface
treatments of cord-marked, fabric-marked, and a very
few linear check-stamped sherds (Coe 1964:30-32).
Although seemingly very different from Badin, Coe has
recently commented that there was "a long period of
gradual change" (Coe 1995:154), suggesting that we
should be expecting a number of intermediate
Badin/Yadkin sherds in the Piedmont. It is regrettable
that several of the seemingly "beat" Yadkin sites, such as
the Trestle site (31An19) explored by Peter Cooper
(Ward 1983:72-73), have never been published.
In some respects the Late Woodland (1,200
B.P. to 400 B.P.) may be characterized as a
continuation of previous Middle Woodland cultural
assemblages. While outside the Carolinas there were
major cultural changes, such as the continued
development and elaboration of agriculture, the
Carolina groups settled into a lifeway not appreciably
different from that observed for the previous 500-700
years. From the vantage point of the Middle Savannah
Valley Sassaman and his colleagues note that, "the Late
Woodland is difficult to delineate typologically from its
antecedent or from the subsequent Mississippian period"
(Sassaman et al. 1990:14). This situation would
remain unchanged until the development of the South
Appalachian Mississippian complex (see Ferguson
1971).
characteristic was the use of soft, thick cords for both
the cordage and nets which were used to stamp the
pottery (Coe 1995:157). The ware was described by Coe
in the unpublished Poole site report (Coe n.d.).s This
pottery appears to represent an evolution from the
earlier Yadkin wares (Coe 1995:156) and, like with the
transition from Badin to Yadkin, Coe suggests that the
evolution of the Uwharrie was also gradual - again
suggesting that we should be seeing a variety of
intermediate "types."
Of equal interest is a radiocarbon date of A.D.
1610, suggesting that this pottery lasted well into the
protohistoric. Coe also notes that "Town Creek and
other villages situated along the fall line between the
Piedmont and the Coastal Plain seem to have formed a
southern boundary for the production and use of
Uwharrie ware," which he suggests was made by the
ancestors of the Sara, Tutelo, Occaneechi, Saponi, and
Keyauwee (Coe 1995:158).
Woodland in the Coastal Plain
It is between 4,000 and 3,000 B.P. when
Phelps (1983:26-27, Figure 1.2) notes that the coastal
plain can be divided into a northern and southern
region. Our attention will focus on the northern region,
along with brief remarks on the adjacent Piedmont.
Along the northern coastal plain the Early
Woodland has produced occasional sites with fiber-
tempered pottery, but it is most commonly characterized
by Deep Creek pottery identified by Phelps (1983:29-
31). This pottery is tempered with coarse sand making
it feel sandy to the touch.' The pottery may be cord
The Late Woodland is typically associated with
small triangular points such as Uwharrie, Caraway, Pee
Dee, and Clarksville (Coe n.d., 1964;49; Oliver 1985;
South 1959:144-146). The characteristic pottery is the
Llwharrie series which contains crushed quartz (one
characteristic of which is its tendency to protrude
through the wall of the pottery). This aeries included
cord-marked and net-impressed surface treatments, but
in the Uwharie the stamping was frequently
overscraped. Lips were frequently notched or pinched
and the rim was often decorated with incised hatch
marks. Coe also comments that a consistent
s'T'his study was intended to be published under a
monograph series entitled, University ? of N" Carolina
Labar wy aJAm,,k m Archaeology Pubk two, but was never
completed. The work was conducted in 1936, although the
ensuing report is undated.
e In North Carolina, as in South Caroliaa, type
descriptions tend to be kwaely written with attributes poorly
defined. To further complicate typological issues, there is
almost no petrographic or chemical studies of these wares.
Consequently, descriptive re6reaoes such as "sandy " "coarse,"
and "line" are meant only as general statements.
19
•
•
INTENSIVE ARCHAEOLOGICAL SURVEY OF THREE TRACTS IN NORTH CAROLINA
marl=ed, fabric impressed, simple stamped, net-
impressed, and plain. Phelps has suggested subsuming
the New River (a similar pottery identified on the
southern coast) into Deep Creel= "in order to standardize
typology across the Coastal Plain" (Phelps 1983:31).
This has apparently not attracted much support,
although frankly neither has the use of Loftfield's New
River type. One factor which certainly complicates such
efforts is the near total absence of excavation data
coupled with good radiocarbon dates (a problem
admitted by Phelps [1983:321). Little is known about
possible cultural associations, although there is some
limited evidence that at least some of the small variants
of the Savannah River Stemmed may be found with
Early Woodland materials. For example, Oliver notes
the co-occurrence of Gypsy Stemmed points with
Swannonoa pottery, dated to about 200 B.C. at the
Warren Wilson site (Oliver 1981:185). John Davis
reports the association of a Gypsy Stemmed point with
Yadlzin pottery (although Bailin is also reported)
radiocarbon dated to between 410 B.C. and A.D. 10 at
31FY549 (Davis 1987:1, 5).7 The large triangular
Roanoke point (South 1959:146-148) is likely also
associated with Early Woodland ceramics.
In spite of our near total ignorance of Early
Woodland sites, many suggest that the subsistence
economy was based primarily on deer hunting and
fishing, with supplemental inclusions of small
mammals, birds, reptiles, and shellfish. This is based on
the continuation of a generalised Late Archaic pattern,
which may or may not be appropriate.
Somewhat more information is available for
the Middle Woodland, typically given the range of about
2,300 B.P. to 1,200 S.P. The beat data concerning
Middle Woodland Coastal Zone assemblages comes
' Although very interesting, this feature should be
cautiously interpreted since the carbonized material came
from a depth of Daly 4 to 12 cm below the ground surface and
Davis notes that the feature was somewhat dispersed by
"natural processes." Further, the association of what is
reported as both Badin and YaAin pottery in the same
feature may help account for the relatively large radiometric
span. Billy Oliver (personal communication 1996), however,
reports that another similar feature was also recovered from
this site, although it has not been reported.
from Phelps' (1983:32-33) work in the north coastal
region and can be only cautiously extended to either the
southern coast or the SandUs. The pottery is his
Mount Pleasant series which includes very coarse quartz
temper and exhibits fabric-impressed, cord-marl=ed, net-
impressed, and plain surface treatments. Associated
items include small varieties of the Roanoke Large
Triangular points, Yadkin points, sandstone abraders,
shell pendants, polished stone gorgets, colts, and woven
marsh mats.
Significantly, both primary inhumations and
cremations are found. It seems to be characterized by a
pattern of settlement mobility and short-term
occupation. Phelps (1983), for example, notes a
decrease in the number of small sites along the smaDer
tributary streams and an increase in the number of sites
along major streams and estuaries. He suggests the
presence of seasonal subsistence camps (focused on
either coastal shellfish or riverine species further inland)
coupled with sedentary villages. The shift in settlement
patterns, according to Phelps, may be related "to
increased dependence on domesticated plants" (Phelps
1983:35), a conclusion with very little support.
In some respects the Late Woodland (1,200
B.P. to 4,00 B.P.) may be characterized as a
continuation of previous Middle Woodland cultural
assemblages. While outside the Carolinas there were
major cultural changes, such as the continued
development and elaboration of agriculture, the
Carolina groups settled into a lifeway not appreciably
different from that observed for the previous 500-700
years. From the vantage point of the Middle Savannah
River Valley Sassaman and his colleagues note that,
"the Late Woodland is difficult to delineate typologically
from its antecedent or from the subsequent
Mississippian period" (Sassaman at al. 1990:14). This
situation would remain unchanged until the
development of the South Appalachian Mississippian
complex (see Ferguson 1971).
Phelps would challenge this view, at least for
the north coastal region, holding instead that "from
A.D. 800 onward archaeological assemblages of the
Late Woodland period in the North Co" region can
be related to ethnohiatoric information and studies, thus
providing the relative comfort of social and linguistic
20
.7

BACKGROUND RESEARCH
identities and the use of the direct historical approach"
(Phelps 1983:36). In the north Phelps has done a
superb job identifying the Carolina Algonkians (on the
coast) and the Tuscarora (on the interior). The
Algonkians are associated with the Colington phase and
the associated pottery is shell-tempered with fabric-
impressed, simple-stamped, plain, and incised surface
treatments (Phelps 1983:36, 39-43; see also Gardner
1990; Phelps 1981, 1982, 1984). The inland
Tuscarora appear to have been producing the Cathie
series pottery, which is tempered with grit and pebbles
and has fabric-impressed, simple-stamped, incised, and
plain surfaces (Phelps 1983:37-39, 43-47).
Mississippian
The Mississippian in the North Carolina is
intimately tied to the Pee Dee. In spite of this Ward
only briefly mentions the culture in Iris synthesis of the
North Carolina Piedmont (Ward 1983:63) and until
recently one had to piece together ideas and concepts
largely from Reid's (1967) typology of the pottery
(which does provide a little background) or Ferguson's
(1971) examination of what he called the South
Appalachian Mississippian, which included central and
northern Georgia, the Middle Chattahoochee River
Valley, and the Atlantic Coastal Plain. More recently
Coe (1995) has filled in at least some of the blanks in
Pee Dee research, although much still remains to be
explored.
Coe's earliest discussion of Pee Dee focused on
Town Creek and he commented that the occupation was
"one of the best archaeological records of the movement
of a people in the southeast" (Coe 1952:309). The
people bearing the Pee Dee culture moved into the
Carolina Piedmont from the south, displacing the
native Uwharrie culture, and after a relatively brief
period of time retreated to the south in the face of the
advancing Siouan. Pee Dee has received many dates
since first discussed and, through time, has gradually
been pushed earlier - first to about A.D. 1450 and
most recently, by Oliver (1992) to occupy the span
from about A.D. 1100 to 1500.
(1995) and his co-authors that review lithics, faunal
remains, plant materials, human remains, and of course
the Pee Dee pottery. Still to be resolved, however, is the
relationship of Pee Dee to the range of other
complicated stamped materials found in the Carolinas.
Protolustoric and Historic Native American
Whatever simplicity the Carolina Piedmont
exhibits during the Woodland or even Mississippian, is
shattered in the Proto-Historic and early Historic. Coe
observes that:
Sara and Tutelo pottery evolved into
a new style named Dan River; what
was thought to be early Occaneechi
is presently termed Hillsboro; the
Saponi style was named Linwood;
and the Keyauwee pottery of this
period is called Caraway (Coe
1995:159).
Coe explains that what was previously called Linwood is
today classified as Caraway. In spite of this, he
distinguishes the two, commenting that the Saponi
wares have a different rim treatment and the paddles
were carved with steel knives rather than stone tools
(Coe 1995:161).
In spite of Coe's desire to "wrap up" everything
in the Piedmont in this neat package, the more detailed
research of his students suggests the situation is far
from clear. For those willing to carefully explore
Wilson's 600+ pages on the Carolina and Virginia
Siouan groups, there is the tantalizing suggestion that
the Hillsboro wares may not even represent a Siouan
group. More over he explains, by way of a summary:
Because of the numerous
shortcomings in the ceramic record
for the Carolina and Virginia
Piedmont, and the lack of precise
dates for most of the assemblages, a
true synthesis cannot be attempted
(Wilson 1983:483).
The most complete information concerning
the extensive work at Town Creek comes from Coe
He does, however, offer some generalizations which help
us complete a picture or "snapshot" of the Piedmont
21

•
INTENSIVE ARCHAEOLOGICAL SURVEY OF T14REE TRACTS IN NORTH CAROLINA
during the Historic Period.
For example, Wilson observes that the
distribution of Pee Dee and supposedly Siouan forms
suggests that the two groups were interacting along the
upper Wateree/lower Catawba, as well as the upper Pee
Dee and lower Yadkin drainages, although why there is
a gap between the two regions is far less clear.
Nevertheless, the Pee Dee probably introduced such
traits as burnishing and complicated stamping, cazuella
bowl forms, and rim applique strips. He goes on to
observe that, "it now seems probable that there was a
development during the early part of the Late
Prehistoric period of ceramics along the Catawba and
Yadkin Rivers that came later to be called by the generic
name 'Catawba'" (Wilson 1993:484). In contrast, the
more northern Dan River assemblages suggest little
contact with the Pee Dee.
During the Protohistoric Period there is far
less known. The Hillsboro wares, which Coe identifies
with the Occaneechi, seem to have a strong resemblance
to the ceramics along the Roanoke River at the Fall
Line to the northeast. Caraways abundant complicated
stamped pottery suggests a connection with the lower
Yadkin, but little else can be observed concerning this
far too poorly documented assemblage. Wilson remarks
that the "enigmatic" Linwood series is even more poorly
understood. Going back to much earlier efforts to
identify the ancestral home of Linwood in Virginia, he
notes that the issue has never been resolved. Even more
importantly, he comments, "identification of the
Linwood Series with the Saponi of 1701 should not be
taken as a given, especially with the revisions that have
been necessary for the other ceramic-ethnic group
relationships proposed by earlier researchers" (Wilson
1983:487).
Moving into the Historic Period, Wilson
points out that the only information available for the
lower Catawba is the fleeting mention of Elkin,
mentioned by Coe as being associated with the Catawba
Indians of 1700. Yet nothing has ever been published
on this assemblage and the only available information is
that provided by Wilson from the analysis of a very
small collection. Not unexpectedly, it is dominated by
smoothing, burnishing, complicated stamping, and
corncob impressing. He suggests that complicated
stamping and perhaps some other Lamar-like
characteristics continued at least into the late
seventeenth century. The shift from this to what is
recognized today as "Catawba," cannot be explained.
The only other information for the Piedmont
is that from the upper Dan River drainage. There,
excavation at two sites has produced the late seventeenth
century version of the Dan River ware, which Wilson
calls the Oldtown Series (Wilson 1983:615-618). He
found that rim folds, present in the earlier Oldtown
wares (and frequently associated with the Occaneechi),
drop out in the later Oldtown pottery. He admits this
disappearance of rim folds may relate to the
Occaneeclv's loss of power and control over trade routes
at the hands of Nathaniel Bacon in 1676. But he notes
an equally plausible explanation. It may be that the
folded rim originated far to the south, with the
Catawba, and that as their focus turned from the north
to the south with the establishment of a English
settlement in Charleston in 1670, their influence on
the northern Piedmont waned.
Although the ceramic sequence for the Dan
drainage is pretty well understood, he comments that
similar patterns cannot be found in other areas -
simply because too little research has been done.
Moreover, much of what is available is poorly reported.
In summary, Wilson offers a synthesis of Piedmont
Siouan ceramics:
Prior to the Late
Prehistoric period,. the ceramics of a
region probably manifests
characteristics derived from the
cultures located within discrete river
drainages. Interactions would be
linear, and the general pattern of
change and exchange of ceramic
attributes, traits, and modes would
follow a general Coastal Plain-
Piedmont-Mountain direction. This
linear orientation would be tied to
communication and information flow
up and down river systems, and not
between drainages.
With the expansion of the
22
0
•
•
BACKGROUND RESEARCH
Pee Der culture up the Wateree and
Pee Dee Rivers, the same genera)
pattern of interaction is followed
during the Late Prehistoric period for
the lower Catawba and lower Yadkin
drainages. Information and
interaction is most intense up and
down the riven. But, as illustrated by
the presence of Pee Dee sherds in
Pisgah assemblages of western North
Carolina (Dickens 1976:198) and
on the Dan River, these influences
are also felt across the drainages. In
the Piedmont this is manifest by the
beginnings of a north-south, and a
decline of the east-west, orientation
in the ceramics. Contact with the
Spaniards in the 1540s and 1560s
probably provided an impetus to the
changing interaction pattern.
Certainly, with the establishment of
English colonies in Virginia and
South Carolina, the focus for
Piedmont Indian interaction shifted
decidedly north-south, an orientation
which was tied tot he Great Trading
Path, the O caneechi Trail, that cut
across river drainages as it ran from
the Falls of the Appomattox River in
Virginia, to the Fall Line at
Augusta, Georgia. This change is
clearly evident in the increase of
"iouthern" traits in the ceramics
along the Dan River (Wilson
1983:491-492).
In spite of decades of research, the implications of this
scenano is far from clear.
Moving to the Coastal Plain the situation is
somewhat less complex, thanks to both the more
concentrated pvrlr by Phelps and his students, as well as
to the somewhat simpler cultural circumstances. For
example, discussing the coastal region, Gardner explains
that "the cultural pattern of the Late Woodland was
comparable - if not identical - to that of historic
period Algonquins observed by English colonists in
1584" (Gardner 1990: 8). Although the situation may
be similar for the Tuscarora, work at these sites is far
less thorough. Phelps, in fact, noted that, "although a
number of Cashie phase sites are now on record, no
comprehensive study of settlement type and distribution
has been initiated" (Phelps 1983:46).
Historic Overview
The three survey areas are found in two
distinctly different historic regions. The Vance County
project site is part of the region primarily occupied by
the Pediment Siouan. Their history, imperfectly
understood even today, is briefly recounted by Mooney
(1894:37-53) and Rights (1947), with a more recent
analysis by Wilson (1983). Exposure to disease and
alcohol quickly reduced these groups, so that by only
1728 the remnants of Saponi might be described as
"pitiful remnants" (Rights 1947:106).
In contrast, the Tuscarora were far more
powerful and in 1701 Lawson reported that they had 15
towns and a total population of about 5,000. Poor
treatment, improper trading practices, the introduction
of alcohol, the pressure of settlement, and extensive
slaving drove the Tuscarora to war in 1711. North
Carolina appealed to South Carolina for assistance and
Colonial Barnwell led an expedition against the
Tuscarora.
Whatever political reasons there may have for
the support, clearly there was also the hope of acquiring
yet more slaves and plunder. After the January 1712
victory by Barnwell, he complained that while, "we were
putting the [Tuscarora] men to the sword, our Indians
got all the slaves and the plunder, only one girl we got"
(quoted in Rights 1947:57). Barnwell, however,
managed to acquire a fairly large number of slaves later,
luring them to Core Town under the pretext of a peace
settlement. As might he expected this served only to
inflame the situation more and cause new strikes. Again
North Carolina petitioned South Carolina, which this
time sent Colonel Moore in 1713. After a decisive
defeat at Catechna in Greene County, many Tuscarora
moved north to Pennsylvania. Those remaining in
North Carolina were eventually settled on a reservation
in Bertie County, with the last dying in 1802.
With the elimination of the Tuscarora, the
23
0
•
INTENSIVE ARCHAEOLOGICAL SURVEY OF THREE TRACTS IN NORTH CAROLINA
northeastern section of North Carolina was open for
settlement.
It was also about this time that the Proprietary
government, always suffering under inefficient
governors and neglect, collapsed. In 1729 the Crown
purchased the interests of all but one of the proprietors.
Lord Carteret, the sole holdout, maintained his share,
known as the Granville District, embracing the upper
third of North Carolina. Significantly, this area
included about two-thirds of the people in the Colony at
the site - and all three of the study tracts. As might be
imagined, this district caused considerable confusion up
until the American Revolution, when it was seized by
the people living in the area.
Even before the Crowns purchase, however,
there was an effort to create a new precinct or county
in the area of the Tar River and at least by the end of
the second decade of the eighteenth century the area was
considered to be Edgecombe (although this was not
confirmed by the Assembly until 1741).
In 1744 Granville was laid out to include all of
the Edgecombe precinct and was eventually subdivided
to form Granville County (1746) and Halifax County
0 758). In 1777 Nash County was created from the
western part of Edgecombe County.
Collet's 1770 A Comp/eat Map of North.
Carolina (Figure 11) reveals that all three tracts are
situated in the vicinity of major trading paths serving to
connect the areas with either Virginia to the north or
various ports to the west.
In the piedmont, Bute County (no longer in
existence) was formed from Granville in 1764 and was
then further subdivided to form Franklin and Warren
counties in 1779. In contrast to Edgecombe and Nash
counties, whose political histories go back to the
colonial period, Vance County was created from
Granville, Warren, and Franklin counties until 1881
(Corbitt 1950).
was established. In 1776 the Fourth Provisional
Congress met at Halifax, authorizing North Carolina
representatives to the Continental Congress to declare
independence.
Revolutionary War battles in the project areas
was limited. There were no major activities in Vance
County, although Lord Cornwallis did travel through
Edgecombe County on his way north in 1781. Holm
(1999:12) reports that Cornwallis camped near the
present Rocky Mount-Wilson airport and engaged local
militia at several creek crossings.
In the area of piedmont Vance County the
early settlers were primarily from Virginia and tobacco
became the main cash crop by the late eighteenth
century. With tobacco came slaves said as early as 1790
the trend toward large slave populations in the tobacco
counties along the Virginia border was already very clear
(Lefler and Newsom 1954:129). In fact, Warren
County, which included part of Vance, was the only
county in North Carolina with a larger slave population
than free population. In contrast, Nash and
Edgecombe counties tended toward cotton and
subsistence crops and around a quarter of the
population consisted of African American slaves.
During the antebellum Vance participated in
the meteoric rise of bright leaf tobacco, which
encouraged the construction of the Raleigh and Gaston
Railroad and later the Townsville Railroad. To the
southeast agriculture also encouraged the development
of the Wilmington and Raleigh Railroad, completed by
1840 and encouraging additional development. Much
of this transportation improvement is clearly visible on
the 1865 U.S. Coast Survey of North Carolina (Figure
12).
The similarities - and differences - between
the three areas are clearly illustrated by the 1850
census. Slaves accounted for 50.6% of the Edgecombe
population, 48.9% of the Granville population, and
40.4% of the population in Nash County.
Bute sent delegates to the Continental
Congress in New Bem in 1774 and when the
Revolution broke out in April 1775 the Royal
government broke down and a provisional government
24
Nash was also the county with the greatest
diversity of agriculture, producing both cotton (345
bales) and tobacco (5,388 pounds), but also large
quantities of com and other subsistence crops. In
?J
0
•
BACKGROUND RESEARCH
u
WESVANCO TRACT

r
r

N
L ?, .. Tarr
cw ULemon
i D p -- -
LONG TRACT
11. Portion of Co]let s A Compleat Map of North-Carolina showing the vicinity of the three survey tracts.
•
25

0
•
IN'rENSIVE ARCHAEOLOGICAL SURVEY OF THREE TRACTS IN NORTH CAROLINA
?'t''a?nt?l?{r ? . ?' ? ? a auk "tea ?" ' t
"win
Its
:Div z
1?rxnulXI 1) n?. y1'Isir,s t
: Nork 1.
-^I xt9w ?l' N'arrt•nl,n,. I t._.-
'' ,?' •( (' ?• A11 i'?iii ?,
st c ?1r'I 1?Il?T1 t 9 \i t.;•.. IN ><`
oil)
-mt ?1111
?r vrBi
WESVANCOTRACT
' 1' ? tl •villr j/t ? ?? ? ` •, i ,, w? er? a `??,?, \° a +If...?
r ` t• / Y ?IY?'I rr r?ra t .h1:i
• ? 1 J•?? r•r•vI t :?l? r. ` Ip?Jr.urJHr i ?? '?f ?
?. • '
?y • p{rnul i r
1 Mue.
iJSI? (?t•tG?w Ccfliil
?r cast, {a'.`
HICKORY TRACT ?j S,
°p? . C.r i h Ill it rt131?f1. y ? t ?. .
c
vr\
•laa•i,ns ? ? 'rrri{l3 ? i •` ? r ? _
p l Y 1 1{111{ S ?,.
ndrr
r LONG TRACT -'y!t`
!1 ?ts.4 ?? ??` ?l` ,.r I„•..ro Ii, i •311'11)
MOO,
"it
sbara
?
;2A lo
tT. ru f I
l a. It ?
I
figure 12. Portion of the 1865 U.S. Coast Survey map of North Carolina showing the three survey areas.
26

•
•
BACKGROUND RESEARCH
contrast. Granville
ranked first in terms of
to6acc,, production,
boasting a yield of
3,420,884 pounds,
compared to their
paultry production of 76
bales of cotton. The
county also ranged fifth
in wool production with
22,134 pounds.
Edgecombe County, in
contrast, produced only
404 pounds of tobacco,
far below adjacent Nash
County, but 3,097 bales
of cotton, placing it
fourth in terms of
cotton production
(DeBow 1854).
The study areas
were largely shielded
from direct conflict Figure 13. Portion of a 19
during the Civil War, County.
although Union forces
under Potter did strike
the rail lines and cotton mills in Nash County in 1863.
At the end of the war Sherman passed southwest of
Nash and Edgecombe, going through Smitbfield and
Raleigh.
After the Civil War the local communities
returned to agriculture, at various times casting their
fortunes with either cotton or tobacco. By the end of
the nineteenth century, however, all three areas were
heavily invested in tobacco. Edgecombe's tobacco crop
accounted for 4,000 acres and a production of
4,000,000 pounds of bright leaf. Nash County had
devoted 5,500 acres to tobacco, with a return of
4,500,000 pounds. Vance, being a relatively new
county, and smaller, was producing only 2,000,000
pounds of tobacco annually, as well as about 3,000
bales of cotton (State Board of Agriculture 1896:335,
371, 403). All three counties also had very large black
populations - reflecting their early reliance on slavery.
Edgecombe's population was nearly two-thirds black,
Vance followed close behind with a 63.4% black
population, and Nash evidenced the smallest Afncan
American population, accounting for only two fifths of
the citizens.
The ascendancy of tobacco held through much
of the early twentieth century. In 1939, for example,
Rocky Mount, in Nash County, was listed as the third
largest tobacco market in the state, behind Wilson and
Greenville.
The only early twentieth century map
identified is a 15topographic sheet showing the vicinity
of the Long tract in Edgecombe County (Figure 13).
Dating from 1903 this identifies several structures,
oriented to the nearby east-west road system, on the
edge of the survey tract. This is a typical nineteenth
century settlement pattern illustrating the increasing
importance of the road system, as well as the decline in
the use of water transportation.
27
is
0 INTENSIVE ARCHAEOLOGICAL SURVEY OF THREE TRACTS IN NORTH CAROLINA
L`
28
0

METHODS
•
Field Methods
The initially proposed field techniques involved
the placement of shovel tests at 100-foot intervals
along transects also placed at 100-foot intervals with
shovel tests expected to be 1.0-foot in diameter and
1.0-1.5-feet below the surface, or to subsoil. In areas
considered to have a low probability for the recovery of
archaeological sites, shovel tests were excavated at 200-
foot intervals. In areas of standing water, wetlands, and
slope of greater than 15%, no tests would be excavated.
All soil would be screened through 1/+ inch mesh, with
each test numbered sequentially. All cultural remains
would be collected, except for shell, mortar, and brick,
which would be quantitatively noted in the field and
discarded. Notes would be maintained for profiles at
any sites encountered.
During the survey it was noted that portions
of the project areas had moderate to excellent surface
visibility, so in addition to shovel testing, a pedestrian
survey was performed. When sites were discovered,
areas around them were examined to understand site
dynamics. This was done to help determine site
boundaries and site integrity.
Should sites be identified by shovel testing,
further tests would be used to obtain data on site
boundaries, artifact quantity and diversity, site
integrity, and temporal affiliation. These tests would be
placed at either 25 or 50-foot intervals in a simple
cruciform pattern until two consecutive negative shovel
tests were encountered. The information required for
completion of North Carolina Office of State
Archaeology site forms would be collected and
photographs would be taken, if warranted in the
opinion of the field investigators.
Long Tract, Edgecomhe County
Upon arriving at the Long tract, we noticed
that the eastern-most portion of the tract (adjacent to
Kingsboro Road) consisted of cultivated and fallow
fields. In addition, houses currently occupied were
located in the northern portion of the survey tract. The
eastern portion of the tract was also subjected to a
pedestrian survey due to the excellent ground visibility.
Sites located during pedestrian survey in the fallow and
cultivated fields were shovel tested to further determine
the site boundaries and site integrity. The remainder of
the tract was shovel tested, as mentioned above. A total
of three sites and a standing historic resource were
located during the survey of the Long tract.
Hickory Tract, Nash County
The Hickory tract consisted entirely of
cultivated fields. The ground visibility over the tract
ranged from at least 50% to upwards of 75%,
permitting a pedestrian survey at 100-foot intervals
throughout the fields, in addition to shovel testing in
areas of lower visibility (50%). A number of sites were
located on the basis of intensive pedestrian survey,
which were subsequently shovel tested to further
determine the site boundaries and site integrity. A total
of seven sites and one standing historic resource were
identified in this tract.
Wesvanco Tract, Vance County
The Wesvanco tract consisted mainly of mixed
hardwood forests with a few cleared areas, and two areas
of mobile homes. The entire tract could be accessed by
a number of overgrown dirt roads that run throughout
the tract. During shovel testing of the area, a number
of large modem trash piles were discovered (Figure 14).
These areas of trash were not shovel tested due to safety
concerns. In addition, the areas surrounding the
mobile homes were not shovel tested due to the
presence of landscaped yards and gravel parking areas.
29
0
•

Site Evaluation
Sites will be evaluated for further work based
on the eligibility criteria for the National 'Register of
Historic Places. Chicora Foundation only provides an
opinion of National Register eligibility and the final
determination is made by the Office of State
Archaeology.
The criteria for eligibility to the National
Register of Historic Places is described by 36CFR60.4,
which states:
the quality of significance in
American history, architecture,
archaeology, engineering, and
culture is present in districts, sites,
buildings, structures, and objects
that possess integrity of location,
design, setting, materials,
worizmanship, feeling, and
association, and
a. that are associated with events
30
that have made a significant
contribution to the broad patterns
of our history; or
b. that are associated with the lives
of persons significant in our past;
or
c. that embody the distinctive
characteristics of a type, period, or
method of construction or that
represent the work of a master, or
that possess high artistic values, or
that represent a significant and
distinguishable entity whose
components may lath individual
distinction; or
d. that have yielded, or may be
likely to yield, information
important in prehistory or history.
National Register Bullatin 36 (Townsend et al.
1993) provides an evaluative process that contains five
•
INTENSIVE ARCHAEOLOGICAL SURVEY OF THREE TRACTS IN NORTH CAROLINA
•
METHODS
steps for forming a clearly defined explicit rationale for
either the site's eligibility or lack of eligibility. Briefly,
these steps arc-
¦ identification of the site's data sets
or categories of archaeological
information such as ceramics, hthics,
subsistence remains, architectural
remains, or sub-surface features;
Archaeology. Field notes and photographic materials
have been prepared for curation using archival
standards and will be transferred to the North Carolina
Office of State Archaeology as soon as the project is
complete. Analysis of the collections followed
professionally accepted standards with a level of
intensity suitable to the quantity and quality of the
remains.
¦ identification of the historic
context applicable to the site,
providing a framework for the
evaluative process;
¦ identification of the important
research questions the site might be
able to address, given the data sets
and the context;
•
¦ evaluation of the site's
archaeological integrity to ensure
that the data sets were sufficiently
well preserved to address the research
questions; and
¦ identification of important
research questions among all of
those which might be asked and
answered at the site.
This approach, of course, has been developed
for use documenting eligibility of sites being actually
nominated to the National Register of Historic Places
where the evaluative process must stand alone, with
relatively little reference to other documentation and
where typically only one site is being considered.
Laboratory Analvsis
L
The cleaning and analysis of artifacts was
conducted in Columbia at the Chieora Foundation
laboratories. These materials have been catalogued and
accessioned for curation at the North Carolina Office
of State Archaeology, the closest regional repository.
The site forms for the identified archaeological sites
have been filed with the North Carolina Office of State
31
0

RESULTS
•
Introduction
The intensive shovel testing and pedestrian
survey identified a total of thirteen sites and five
historic resources in Long, Hickory, and Wesvanco
tracts. Of these, site 31 NS90 located on the Hickory
tract and 31VN259", an historic cemetery located on
the Wesvanco tract, are recommended as potentially
eligible. Further work is recommended for these sites
prior to any ground disturbing activities. Further
documentation is recommended for Historic Resource
1 on the Long tract. No other management work is
recommended for the other sites and historic resources
recorded in these tracts.
Identified Sites
A total of three sites and a standing historic
resource were located on the Long tract in Edgecombe
County. These sites include two isolated prehistoric
occurrences (31 ED345, 31ED346), a historic surface
scatter (31ED347") and Historic Resource 1 (Figure
15). At the Hickory tract, a total of seven sites and a
standing historic resource were located. These include
a very large, potentially eligible prehistoric lithics site
(31 N S90), two small • prehistoric lithic scatters
(31NS91, 31NS96), two isolated prehistoric lithic
occurrences (31NS92, 31NS95), two historic sites
(31NS93", 31NS94"), and Historic Resource 1
(Figure 16). Testing at the Wesvanco tract located an
isolated prehistoric lithic occurrence (31VN258), a
potentially eligible cemetery (31VN259"), a historic
site (31VN260"), and Historic Resources 1, 2, and 3
(Figure 17).
Long Tract, Edgecomhe County
Site 31 ED345 is an isolated rhyollitic flake
located in a cultivated field less than 100 feet south of
a small stream at the northeastern edge of the tract.
The flake was located during pedestrian survey and
subsequent shovel testing produced no other artifacts
(Figure 18).
The site's central UTM coordinates are
N3979440 E258420 and the elevation is 105 feet
above mean sea level (AMSL). The site is located on
Norfolk sandy loam. Normally, these soils have an A
horizon of brown (10YR5/3) sandy loam and light
yellowish brown (10YR6/4) to 12 inches, followed by a
B horizon of yellowish brown (10YR5/6) sandy clay
loam. These shovel test soils revealed that the A
horizon has been depleted, most likely due to plowing,
cultivation, and erosion.
The data sets present at the site include only
one non-diagnostic rhyollitic flake. This artifact does
not permit a discussion of significant research
questions. In addition, the location of the site and the
eroded soils at the site suggest that the site will not
produce data sets necessary to address significant
research questions.
As a result, site 31 ED345 is recommended as
not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places
and no further management work is recommended.
Site 31 E D346 is a small prehistoric hithic site
located in a recently plowed field 200 feet south of a
small stream in the northeastern edge of the tract. The
site is located 300 feet south of Highway 64A. The
central UTM coordinates are N3979440 E258290
and the elevation is 105 feet AMSL.
The site includes a quartz biface fragment and
three quartz flakes, which were located on the surface
during pedestrian survey of the field. The lithics were
recovered from an area measuring 2,250 ft2. Ten
shovel tests placed in a modified cruciform pattern
intended to cover the area of the surface scatter
produced no other artifacts (Figure 19).
33
0
0
•
INTENSIVE ARCHAEOLOGICAL SURVEY OF THREE TRACTS IN NORTH CAROLINA
v ?°??•• \
?10 ?I
? Ye
v
V
f
M
TQ Y
M
M
e
M

O 6 C HISTOHI
SOU, Y
1
31E0346 A 31ED
346
I
? 31ED3447"' ? _
HWy 64

_ 0 Y
>?

Cam.
26
•
`
•
/ Y
/ ??
/ r/ I
G
1000 0
2000 3000 4000 7000 FEIT
5000 60DO

Figure 15. Sites located in the Long tract, Eagecombe County (base map is USGS Hartsease 1981, 1:24,000).
34
0
•
•
RESULTS

T
l?
J
BM 13
,i0 a
t
Y D
e ?\
If
oy~
M
? C
s ?
I fI Sy„ ?
{ v.
170
X000 6000
1000 0 1000 2000 Opp X000 70M FEET ?
gure 16. Sites located in Hickory tract, Nash County (base map is USGS Ringwood 1963, 1:29

C
.?e
f
C
C
35
0
LI
•
IN'TENSTVE ARCHAEOLOGICAL SURVEY OF THREE TRACTS IN NORTH CAROLINA
1000 0 IOWO ' 2000, 3000. .4000 6000 _ 6000 70001d'
C
If* Z-1 I 11!".)/ \ \1{1%1?' fall\ 1 \ ??
igu.re 17. Sites located in Wesvanco tract, Vance County (base map is USGS Henderson 1970PR82,
1:24,000).
36

•
suggest that the site will
not produce data sets
necessary to address
significant research
questions.
As a result, site
31ED346 is not
recommended as eligible
. for the National
Register of Historic
Places and no further
management work is
recommended.
RESULTS
Site 31 ED346 is located on Wagram loamy
sand with 0-6% slopes. In general, these soils have an
A horizon of dark grayish brown (2.5Y4/2) loamy sand
to seven inches below the surface over a pale yellow
(2.5Y7/4) loamy sand up to 29 inches below the
surface. The B horizon occurs below this as a yellowish
brown (IOYR5/8) loamy sand. Shovel testing revealed
that the A horizon soils have eroded slightly, most
likely due to recent plowing and erosion.
window glass fragments, an aqua glass jar fragment, a
whiteware fragment, a brown salt glazed stoneware
fragment, and a Bristol exterior glazed stoneware
fragment. Shovel tests were placed in a cruciform
pattern with the center shovel test placed in the center
of the surface artifacts. This test, N200 E200
contained two small whiteware fragments. Eight
additional shovel tests produced no other artifacts
(Figure 20).
Site 31ED347'" is located on Norfolk loamy
sand with 2-6% slopes. Generally, these soils have an
A horizon of brown (10YR5/3) loamy sand and light
yellowish brown (10YR6/4) loamy sand to 12 inches.
CREEK `
THICK BRUSH ?.
O O ;O O O
O
CULTIVATED
FIELD
o N
cis O NEGATIVE SHOVELTEST
SCALE IN FEET -- SURFACE SCATTER
figure 18. Map of 31ED345, Long tract.
The data sets present at the site include only
four non-diagnostic quartz lithics. These artifacts do
not permit a discussion of significant research
questions. In addition , the location of the site and the
eroded soils at the site
Site 31 ED347" is
a historic scatter located
900 feet south of
Highway 64A and 2400
feet west of Kingsboro
Road in a heavily
wooded area accessed by
an overgrown logging
road. The central UTM
coordinates are
1\13979230 E257780
and the elevation is 110
feet AMSL. The site
was located along the
side of the dirt road and
surface artifacts were
collected, including two
37
0
INTENSIVE ARCHAEOLOGICAL SURVEY OF THREE TRACTS IN NORTH CAROLINA
•

WOODS
O - O
NM 0 o N
N200- O O O O O
PLOWED
FIELD
N175 • O
_-o
WOODS
OVERGROWN ACCESS ROAD
E175 E200 E225
0 25 so O NEGATIVE SHOVELTEST
SCALE IN FEET -- SURFACE SCATTER
Figure 19. Map of 31ED346, Long tract.
The B horizon consists of yellowish brown (10YR5/6)
sandy clay loam. Shovel tests revealed that there has
been very little erosion of the A horizon soils, although
there may have been some damage to the site from
logging activities.
The data sets recovered during surface
collections and testing represent the kitchen and
architecture artifact groups. These artifacts suggest
that the site dates to the late nineteenth or early
twentieth century. While there are a number of
pertinent research questions that late nineteenth and
early twentieth century sites can address, such questions
38
would require a
much broader
range of data
then we have
found at
31ED347". For
example, to
explore site
function, it is
necessary for the
site to yield more
artifacts, features,
and material
suitable for
dating. It is also
necessary for the
site to exhibit, at
the very least,
some degree of
intra - site
p atterning,
p e r h a p s
concentrations? of
nails or other
construction
hardware reflected
in surface
collections or
shovel testing
density. None of
these data sets are
present. It seems
very unlikely that
the site has the
ability to provide the data sets necessary in order to
address these questions. The site appears very
superficial, yielding very few subsurface artifacts.
As a result, we recommend the site as not
eligible for inclusion on the National Register of
Historic Places and recommend no further
management activities.
Historic Resource 1 is a house and large
warehouse or industrial structure located at the comer
of Highway 64A and Kingshoro Road. The Louse is
currently occupied and the larger structure is used as a

•
r
L
RESULTS
{lea market on the weekend called "the Packhouse."
No shovel testing was done in the accompanying yards
for these structures. The central UTM coordinates are
N13979500 E258500.
The house is a single story rectangular
building with a side gabled roof constructed of metal
sheeting (Figure 21). The exterior is covered in metal
siding, and seems to have concrete foundations. A
brick central chimney is visible from the front view of
the house. The roof extends to cover a full-width porch
with wooden posts, concrete foundations and concrete
steps. There is a single double pane window located in
the front of the house between two paneled doors that
each have six pane windows.
The larger structure appears to have been
constructed as a warehouse or storage building (Figure
22 and 23). It is a two story structure constructed of
horizontal wood siding and
machine cut nails with wooden
post foundations. A metal siding
skirt has been placed at the base
of the base of the building on the
northern side. The side gabled
roof is constructed of metal
sheeting. There are doors in the NUS .
northern (which faces Highway
64A) and eastern sides of the MM
house on both stories. All of
these doors, except the door N17s-
currently used as an entranceway,
are boarded up. In addition, six
windows of the northern side of
the building have also been
boarded up. A small tin roofed,
one story porch with wooden
posts covers the entranceway to
the building, which is accessed by
either a wooden ramp or steps
resting on concrete blocks.
There warehouse or
storage function of the building
is suggested by the appearance of
doors located on both stories of
building. Large quantities of
material, such as tobacco or cotton, would have been
hoisted up to the second story for storage through these
doors, rather than climbing steps. The name of the
building, "The Packhouse," also suggests its former
function
While this resource is not recommended as
potentially eligible, we are recommending that further
documentation of the resource be undertalzen prior to
any ground disturbing or construction activities in the
area. Standing rural storage buildings that have
retained integrity and much of the original construction
materials, such as the Packing House, are not
common. Further documentation of the building
would add to our understanding of the area's economic
history and distribution of goods.
o
o N
0 Q O O
O
I I i
F175 E200 E225
o75nso ` o
0
SCALE IN FEET
• POSITIVE SHOVELTEST I C
O NEGATIVE SHOVELTEST
-- SURFACE SCATTER
re 20. Map of site 31ED347", Long tract.
39
0
•
•
40
0
INTENSIVE ARCHAEOLOGICAL SURVEY OF THREE TRACTS IN NORTH CAROLINA
u
•
Hickory Tract, Nash County
Site 31 NS90 is a very large prehistoric lithic
scatter located in the eastern portion of the tract in a
cultivated field. The site is situated 1500 feet west of
Beaverdam Swamp and 4800 feet east of Interstate 95.
The central UTM coordinates are N4002000
E250170 and the elevation is 120 feet AMSL.
Site 31NS90 is located on a slight hill that
slopes southeast towards Beaverdam Swamp. The site
seems to be concentrated on this southeast slope face.
The site was first noted during pedestrian survey of the
field. A general surface collection was begun until we
realized that the site covered a large area that would
require greater horizontal control than a general
collection. Rather than continue collecting the site in
a complete general collection, we walked transects at
100-foot intervals, collecting artifacts along these
transects also at 100-foot intervals in order to
determine the site boundaries. This intensive collection
enabled us to pinpoint the heaviest surface
concentrations of artifacts. Based on these surface
collections, the site covers an area that measures
990,000 ft2. Due to this large size, we decided to test
the site in a modified cruciform pattern, with the east-
west line of shovel tests placed in the heaviest
concentration of artifacts near the overgrown road that
bounded the field (Figure 24). The other north-south
lines were excavated in areas convenient for testing that
would do the least disturbance to the plants. Shovel
testing was then done at 100-foot intervals. It was
decided that closer interval testing would need to be
performed at the next level of testing for the site.
More than 200 artifacts were recovered from
this site (listed in Table 4), with 177 collected from the
surface of the site and 30 artifacts recovered from the
subsurface. The majority of the artifacts (162)
consisted of quartz and rhyollitic flakes. Fourteen
41
RESULTS
•
•
N
TR 9
7 3
TA 7
TR B
TR 12 TA It TR 10 TR B TR 5 TR A TR 2 TR I
N9oo . I "

1 woomp

N900. ,

1
SWAMP

r 1 i AREA

I 1

1
NTW -
1 I

GENERAL
N800• 1 SURFACE
COLLECTION 2 I SLOPES
1 DOWN
1 1
N600 • 1

1 i
1 ` 0 IOD 200
N100• 1 (GENERAL
1 ; COLL ECTION 1 ( SCALE IN FEET
1 1
N300 - 1 1 \
1 1
1
1 1
1 \

N200 •
1
1 p O
OVERGROWN Rd1O
N100-
1 I I • POSITIVE SHOVEL TEST
1 I I
EO E100 E200 I I I I I
E300 E100 ON E900 ET00 E900 P-900 E1000 O NEGATIVE SHOVELTEST
® POSITIVE SURFACE COLLECTION
.-TR 22 TRANSECT DESIGNATION
- - SITE BOUNDARY
Figure 24. Map of site 31 NS90, Hickory tract.
9

RESULTS
Table 4.
Artifacts Recovered from 31NS90
is
Used Morrow Hamm.,
pro FIa6- Flab,: Shatter Mtn Carrawa, Point 6ac Bilaee Inc stone Con Cobble
Surfs.:
Gen. Coll. 1 3: 6 1 1 2 1
Gen. Coll. 2 is .3 1 I I
N100300 E300 28 2 1 1 1
N400 E300 7 2
N500 E300 I
N600 E300 1
N800.900 E300 4 1
N500 E400 2
N900 E400 I I I
N 100 E500 1 I
N200 E500 6
N300 E500 F
N400 E500
N500 E500
N300 E600 3 1
NSW E600 2
N900 E600 2
N 100 E700 4
N200 E700 2 I
N300 E700 I
N600 E700 I
N800 E700 I
N900 E700 7
N300 E800 I
N500 E800 i
N200 E900 2
N400 E900 3
N500 E900 3
N600 E900 I
N700 E900 1
N800 E900 I
N500 E1000 I
Su6surlac:
N200 EO I
N200 E100 1
N200 E200 3
N200 E600 1
N200 E700 I
N300 E200 I 1
N300 E600 3
N400 E200 2
60
0
N400 E 2
'
00
N500 E200 L
N500 E800 I
N600 E600 1 1
N700 E800 3
Total 162 14 9 2 1 3 9 3 2 2
r6yollitic flakes were placed in the used flake category,
although many of these flakes appear to have fresh
edges and may not actually represent prehistoric use.
Other non-diagnostic lithics recovered from the site
include three point fragments, nine biface fragments,
three possible hammerstones, and two cores. Three
diagnostic lithic artifacts were also recovered and
include two Morrow Mountain points and a Carraway
Triangular point. All three points are made of a
rhyollitic material. One of the Morrow Mountain
points is somewhat unusual in its small size, measuring
28 mm in length, falling just under Coe's minimum
length of 30 mm. However, the width to length ratio
of 1:1.5 is within his original definition {Coe
43

•
•
INTENSIVE ARCHAEOLOGICAL SURVEY OF THREE TRACTS IN NORTH CAROLINA
1964:37). While this is a small specimen, it appears to
otherwise fall within the Morrow Mountain definition.
The other Morrow Mountain point measures 51 mm in
length, while the Carraway Triangular point measures
27 mm in length. These three points give us some
indication of the periods during which the area was
used. Morrow Mountain points date to the Middle
Archaic Period (8,000-6,000 B.P.) and Carraway
Triangular points date to the Late Woodland Period
(1,200-400 B.P.).
Site 31NS90 is located on Goldsboro fine
sandy loam. Typically, these soils have an A horizon of
darn grayish brown (10YR4/2) fine sandy loam to 10
inches below the surface, overlying a B horizon of light
vellowish brown (2.5Y6/4) sandy clay loam. Shovel
testing at the site revealed that the A horizon has
eroded by approximately four inches, and in many
cases, the B horizon was visible at the surface. This
damage is most h6ly due to the continued plowing and
cultivation of the field.
The data sets at site 31NS90 include mainly
non-diagnostic lithics and a few diagnostic lithics. The
diagnostic lithics place use of the site during the Middle
Archaic and Late Woodland Period. These dates
suggest that this is a multicomponent site that may
have been used extensively over the years.
A site's eligibility must be assessed based on its
potential to address significant research questions.
There are a number of research questions that the site
may have the potential to address. The site's ability to
address these questions will rest on further examination
of the site. Research topics have been outlined by
Sassaman and Anderson (1994), based on the middle
and Late Woodland context they developed for the
South Carolina Department of Archives and History,
which are also applicable to the North Carolina area.
These significant research questions include:
¦ The typological association of the
MALA point and aspeciafly its spread
to other areas of North Carolina. To
address this question, of course, it
would be necessary to identify a site
with sealed contexts and large
assemblages, similar to the original
Pen Point site.
a The typological significance of the
Morrow Mountain 1 and 11 divisions.
To be able to address this question
sites must not only possess fairly
large numbers of these points, but
there must also be assemblages of
preforms, discarded points, and
flares, all securely associated with the
points.
• The temporal placement of the
Morrow Mountain phase in North
Carolina's Middle Archaic chronology.
This question demands, of course,
the presence of sealed features
capable of providing either
radiometric or at least OCR dates.
Many of the research questions posed by
Sassaman and Anderson (1994:183.192) are so broad
as to be best addressed through comparison research
incorporating either existing records or collections from
multiple sites. Others are primarily methodological and
are related to the techniques used to either identify or
document Archaic sites. Some research topics, however,
are clearly appropriate for individual site locations,
Clearly, the question of extended use of the site begs
additional questions which Sassaman and Anderson
outline. For example:
• What information about group size
or duration of occupation can be
determined fsom assemblages? Can
special activity areas be identified
within larger assemblages? Are
structural remains present? Are the
remains that are found the result of one
or a few visits, numerous visits, or
seasona/or year-round encampments?
In addition, the large surface scatter of flarres
and potential tools at the site may also provide evidence
of technological changes in tool manufactures.
44

RESULTS
A site's eligibility is also based on the integrity
of site, which reflects its ability to address research
questions. At this level of testing, It is difficult to
ascertain how plowing has affected the site's integrity.
However, the sheer size of the surface scatter
demonstrates that data sets have been preserved at the
subsurface level, although they have been turned up by
plowing. The size of the scatter and the multi-
component nature of the site also suggest that the site
has the potential to address typological questions, and
questions concerning long-term use of the site. The
large number of artifacts also indicates that the site has
the ability to produce a quantity of artifacts sufficient
for examining questions pertaining to intro-site
patterning, and possible technological changes.
Overall, at this level of testing, it appears that the site
does possess the integrity necessary to address research
questions.
The above discussion
indicates that 31NS90 has
the ability to address
significant research questions
that would aid in our
understanding of the Middle
Archaic Period, and perhaps
the Late Woodland Period.
However, only through
further archaeological testing
will it be possible to
conclusively assess the site's
eligibility for the National
Register of Historic Places.
For this reason, we
recommend 31 NS90 as
potentially eligible for the
National Register and
recommend that further
testing involving the
excavation of several units be
undertaken to determine the
preservation of subsurface
remains and features, and
further assess the site's ability
to address research questions.
All ground disturbing
construction activities should
be avoided in this area until further archaeological
testing can be undertaken.
Site 31NS91 is a small surface scatter of
lithics located in a cultivated field on the eastern side of
the farm, approximately 1,000 feet west of Beaverdam
Swamp and 3,500 feet north of Highway 44133. The
central UTM coordinates are N4001920 E250240
and the elevation is 120 feet AMSL. The site was
located as we walked to transects in a recently plowed
field at the hield's edge (Figure 25).
A total of two hammerstones, a center
fragment of a rhyolhtic biface fragment, and a rhyollitic
flake were recovered from the surface, covering an area
that measured 75 feet by 20 feet. Nine shovel tests
were placed in the area of the surface artifacts, but no
subsurface remains were recovered.
CULTIVATED FIELD
OVERGROM ACCESS ROAD
N
_--O --------0 0;
O O 0
CULTIVATED FIELD
o 25 50
O NEGATIVE SHOVELTEST
SCALE IN FEET -- SURFACE SCATTER
Figure 25. Ma of 31 NS91, Hickory tract.
45
0
•
•
INTENSIVE ARCHAEOLOGICAL SURVEY OF THREE TRACTS IN NORTH CAROLINA
The site is located on Norfolk loamy sand with
2-6% slopes. Generally, these soils have an A horizon
of brown (10YR5/3) loamy sand and light yellowish
brown (10YR6/4) loamy sand to 12 inches. The B
horizon consists of yellowish brown (10YR5/6) sandy
clay loam. Shovel tests revealed that the A horizon is
somewhat depleted, most likely due to repeated plowing
and cultivation of the field.
The data sets recovered from 31 NS91 include
four non-diagnostic lithics, which does not permit the
site to be dated. Soils also show some erosion and
obvious disturbance through cultivation. In order for
the site to be considered potentially eligible, the site
would need to have the potential to address important
research questions. Generally, diagnostic materials
elucidate research questions pertinent to the site being
considered. However, without diagnostic materials, or
a greater number of artifacts, it is not possible to
construct significant research questions. Based on the
superficial nature of the
h ll f
L CULTIVATED FIELD
DITCH
TR 101 TR®102i TR 103
-?6 'O O
i
O
_ O' 1
Q N
0
0 25 so
O NEGATIVE SHOVELTEST
® POSnWE SURFACE COLLECTION SCALE IN FEET
_Tp 22 TRANSECT DESIGNATION
SITE BOUNDARY
Figure 26. Map of site 3, Hickory tract.
4,6
site, t e sma arty act
number, and the lack of
non - diagnostic
m aterials, we
recommend this site as
not eligible for the
National Register of
Historic Places. No
further management
work is recommended.
Site 31 NS92
is an isolated
occurrence located in a
cultivated field on the
eastern edge of the
farm, approximately
300 feet north of
Highway 44/33 and
1,500 feet west of
Beaverdam Swamp.
The site is located on a
slight rise that slopes
southeast to Beaverdam
Swamp. The central
UTM coordinates are
N4001860 E250180
and the elevation is 120
feet AMSL.
A rhyollitic
Savannah River
Stemmed point, a
rhyellitic shatter, and a
hammerstone were
located at the beginning
0

1r?
u
RESULTS
of two transects,
covering an area that
measures 9,375 ft'
(Figure 26). Six
shovel tests were placed
along Transect 101
and 25 feet west of the
transect in an effort to
avoid damaging plants
and recover subsurface
remains. At Transect
102, four shovel tests
were placed in a
cruciform. pattern.
None of these shovel
tests produced
artifacts.
Table 5.
Artifacts Recovered From 31 N S93-
Glass
Prov. Wbiteware Aoua Arnethvst Clear Milt= Nails Misc.
TR 4 SC 9 1
TR 4 SC 10-I1 3 1 1 1 1
TR 5 SC 12 1
TR 5 SC 14 1 1 UID metal
TR 6 SC 14.15 8 2 2 2 1
TR 7 SC 14 1 1 1 1 UID metal
TR 7 SC 15 1 1
TR 10 SC 10 1
TR 11 SC 12 1
TR 11 SC 13 1
TR 13 SC 14 1
Total 19 3 4 4 3 1 2 (36)
The site is located on Norfolk loamy sand with
2-6% slopes. As mentioned above, these soils have an
A horizon of brown (10YR5/3) loamy sand and light
yellowish brown (10YR6/4) loamy sand to 12 inches.
The B horizon consists of yellowish hrown (10YR5/6)
sandy clay loam. Shovel tests revealed that the A
horizon is somewhat depleted, most likely due to
repeated, and recent, plowing and cultivation of the
field.
Data sets recovered from the site include two
non-diagnostic lithics and a Savannah River Stemmed
point, which dates to the Late Archaic. Although the
site can be dated to the Late Archaic Period, this small
number of artifacts does not permit significant research
questions to be formulated. Because no subsurface
artifacts were recovered, it is unlikely that the site will
produce artifacts that have the potential to address
research questions. For these reasons we recommend
that 31NS92 3 is not eligible for the National
Register. However, we do suggest that if construction
activities are to take place in this portion of the farm,
an intensive surface collection be undertaken at this
area to ensure that the site does indeed include only
four artifacts, since at the time of the survey, the field
had been recently plowed, making surface artifacts more
difficult to recognize.
Site 31NS93" is a historic scatter situated
directly north of 31NS90 on the eastern edge of the
farm in a cultivated field (Figure 27). It is located
3,500 feet north of Highway 44/33 and approximately
1,500 feet west of Beaverdam Swamp. The central
UTM coordinates are N4002140 E250150 and the
elevation is 120 feet AMSL.
The site was located during pedestrian survey
of the field area. A total of 36 artifacts were collected
from the surface (listed in Table 5) in an area
measuring 625,000 ft2. Shovel testing was undertaken
along transects in areas that would not damage plants.
These shovel tests produced no artifacts. The only
dateable ceramics recovered from the site include
undecorated whiteware fragments, which has a date
range from 1813 to 1900, placing the occupation of
the site some time after 1813.
The site is located on Goldsboro fine sandy loam.
Typically, these soils have an A horizon of dark grayish
brown (10YR4/2) fine sandy loam to 10 inches below the
surface, overlying a B horizon of light yellowish brown
(2.5Y6/4) sandy clay loam. Shovel testing at the site
revealed that the A horizon has eroded by approximately
four inches, and in many cases, the B horizon was visible
at the surface. This damage is most likely due to the
continued plowing and cultivation of the field.
The data sets for site 31NS93"
include 36 ceramic, glass, and
47
C7
•
C
INTENSIVE ARCHAEOLOGICAL SURVEY OF THREE TRACTS IN NORTH CAROLINA
TR 14 TR 13 TR 12 TR 11 TR 10 TR 9 TR 8 TR 7 TR 6 TR 5 TR 4
` Sc 15
SC 14
SC 13
SC 12
' SC 11
' Sc 10
Sc 9
r r
SC8
i
SC 7
i
i
Sc 6
31NS90
Sc 5
r
SC 4
i
SC 3
I
O NEGATIVE SHOVELTEST E200
® POSITIVE SURFACE COLLECTION 0 100 200
-TR 22 TRANSECT DESIGNATION
SCALE IN FEET
SC 9 SURFACE COLLECTION UNIT
SITE BOUNDARY
figure 27. Map of site 31 NS93", HicLory tract.
48

•
RESULTS
metal artifacts. These artifacts belong to the kitchen
(n=34) and architecture (n=1) artifact groups. The
small data sets present do not permit a discussion of
significant research questions. In order to address any
research questions, it would be necessary that the site
contain more artifacts, features, and materials suitable
for chronological control. These data sets are not
present at
31 NS93". It
is unlikely that
this superficial
site has the
ability to
produce such
data sets. For
this reason,
31 NS93" is
n o t
recommended
as eligible for
the National
Register and no
further
management
w o r k i s
recommended.
Site
31NS94" is a
historic surface
scatter situated
in a small
cultivated field
on the eastern
edge of the
farm. It is
located 3,000
feet north of
Highway
44/33, and
approximately
1,500 feet west
of Beaverdam
Swamp. The
central UTM
coordinates are
N4001930
E250170 and the elevation is 120 feet AMSL.
The site was located during pedestrian survey
of the field along transects (Figure 28). Shovel testing
was undertaken in cruciform patterns where possible so
that plants would not be damaged. No positive shovel
tests were produced from this testing. The surface
CULTIVATED FIELD OVERGROWN DIRT ROAD
TR 205
TR 206
TR 207 O
"
CULTIVATED FIELD . SC l
SC 2
%
0 SC 3
N200. O `
0
SC 4

O Sc 5
N 0 0SC6
V ACaROWN ROAD
I
CULTIVATED FIELD E200
0 NEGATIVE SHOVEL TEST 0 50 100
® POSMVE SURFACE COLLECTION =::?t
-TR 22 TRANSECT DESIGNATION SCALE IN FEET
SC 9 SURFACE COLLECTION UNff
- - SITE BOUNDARY
Figure 28. Map of site 31 NS94-, Hickory tract.
49

•

INTENSIVE ARCHAEOLOGICAL SURVEY OF THREE TRACTS IN NORTH CAROLINA
TR 402 TR 403
TR 404
O O O O
N
0
O NEGATIVE SHOVELTEST
® POSITIVE SURFACE COLLECTION
0 25 50
.-- TR 22 TRANSECT DESIGNATION
- SITE BOUNDARY SCALE IN FEET
Figure 29. Map of site 31 NS95, Hickory tract.
scatter covered an area measuring 180,000 ft2. Brick
was noted at the southeastern edge of the site. A total
of 18 artifacts were recovered from the surface
collections, as noted in Table 6.
The site is located on Goldsboro fine sandy
loam. Typically, these soils have an A horizon of dark
grayish brown (10YR4/2) fine sandy loam to 10 inches
below the surface, overlying a B horizon of light
yellowish brown (2.5Y6/4) sandy clay loam. Shovel
testing at the site revealed that the A horizon has
eroded by approximately four inches, and in many
cases, the B horizon was visible at the surface. This
damage is most likely due to the continued plowing and
50
cultivation of the
field.
The data
sets at 31NS94"
include ceramic,
glass, and nail
artifacts, which
belong to the
kitchen and
architecture arti fact
groups. While
there are a number
o{ pertinent
research questions
that late nineteenth
and early twentieth
century sites can
address, such
research questions
would require a
much broader
range of data then
we have found at
this site. For
example, to explore
site function, it is
necessary for the
site to yield more
artifacts, features,
and material
suitable for dating.
It is also necessary
for the site to
exhibit, at the very least, some degree of intra-site
patterning, perhaps concentrations of nails or other
construction hardware reflected in surface collections or
shovel testing density. None of these data sets
necessary are present. It seems very unlikely that the
site has the ability to provide the data sets necessary in
order to address these questions. The site appears not
only very superficial, yielding no materials in the
shovel testing, but also appears to have been intensively
plowed, further reducing the potential to recover in situ
historic remains.
As a result, 31NS94" is recommended as
ineligible for inclusion on the National Register and no
0
Ir
u

RESULTS
Table 6.
Artifacts Recovered from 31NS94'`
Prov Artifacts
TR 205 SC 6 1 white-are fragment
I red glass
2 aqua glass
3 clear glass
T206 SC I 1 UID ceramic
1 UID nail
5 clear glass
TR 206 SC 3 1 whiteware fragment
1 milk glass
2 clear glass
TR 207 SC 4 1 milk glass
further management work is
recommended.
Site 31NS95 is located in a
cultivated field 1,600 feet west of
Beaverdam Swamp and 3,200 feet
north of Highway 44/33. The central
UTM coordinates are
N400179OE250130 and the
elevation is 120 feet AMSL.
The site was located during a
pedestrian survey of the field along
Transect 403 (Figure 29). Two large
primary quartz flakes were recovered
from an area measuring 25 feet by 25
feet in diameter. Shovel testing in a
cruciform pattern produced no other
artifacts.
The site is located on
Norfolk loamy sand with 2-6% slopes.
Generally, these soils have an A
horizon of brown (10YR5/3) loamy
sand and light yellowish brown
(10YR6/4) loamy sand to 12 inches.
The B horizon consists of yellowish
brown (10YR5/6) sandy clay loam.
Shovel tests revealed that the A
horizon has eroded and in some cases,
the B horizon was visible at the surface. This erosion
has most likely taken place through plowing and
cultivation of the fields over the years.
The data sets present at 31 N S95 include only
two non-diagnostic lithics. Such a small data set does
not permit a discussion of significant research
questions. It is also unUely that the site will produce
data sets necessary to formulate such questions, based
on the sparsity of artifacts in this area. For these
reasons, site 31NS95 is recommended as not eligible
for inclusion on the National Register, and no further
management work is recommended.
Site 31 NS96 is small lithic scatter located in
cultivated field 2,500 feet north of Highway 44/33 and
I
I
0 0
4 TR rM
TR sot r" Em
1
_ ROW6
0 NEDAYM aNOVEI TESL
® ?DS'" S"AOE OOU.EcT" 0 ri so
QTR a TRAMUCI OE$*MATON
`-- ME aOUNDMY W-MA M PUT
figure 30. Map of site 31NS96, Hickory tract.
51
0
•
/ J1
?J
INTENSIVE ARCHAEOLOGICAL SURVEY OF THREE TRACTS IN NORTH CAROLINA
1,500 feet west of Beaverdam Swamp. The central
UTM coordinates are N4001750 E250140 and the
elevation is 120 fcetAMSL.
During a pedestrian survey of the field, a large
rhyollitic core was noted at the edge of the field near
Transect 403 (Figure 30). At the first surface
collection, a quartz flake and a rhyollitic flake were
collected. The surface collection covers an area that
measures 1,250 ft2. Shovel testing in a cruciform
pattern produced no other artifacts.
The site is located on Norfolk loamy sand.
These soils have an A horizon of brown (10YR5/3)
loamy sand and light yellowish brown (10YR6/4) loamy
sand to 12 inches, and a B horizon of yellowish brown
(10YR5/6) sandy clay loam. Shovel tests revealed that
the A horizon has eroded and in some cases, the B
horizon was visible at the surface. This erosion has
most likely taken place through plowing and cultivation
of the fields over the years.
The data sets present at the superficial site
include only three non-diagnostic lithics. This small
number of artifacts does not enable significant research
questions to be developed. In addition , the sparsity of
artifacts in a plowed field suggests that the site will not
produce data sets necessary to address significant
research questions. For these reasons, 31NS96 is
recommended as not eligible for inclusion on the
National Register of Historic Places. No further
management work is recommended.
Historic Resource 1 is located directly west
of the Hickory tract, approximately 1,000 feet east of
Interstate 95 and 1,800 feet northeast of Highway
44/33.
The structure is an abandoned storage building
constructed of metal siding with a metal roof and
concrete foundations (Figure 31). It is a two story
building with a set of door: at the west side of the
building and a single second story door on the east side
52
•
•
•
RESULTS
of the building. The structure is overgrown on the
north and south sides with vines.
This structure is located outside of the
proposed impact area. We recommend it as ineligible
for inclusion on the National Register and no further
management work is recommended.
were recovered from the surface of the bulldozer cut and
the thick leaf litter did not permit a pedestrian survey of
the forested area. Routine shovel testing in the area
produced no artif acts. A series of nine shovel tests were
placed in a cruciform pattern centering on the positive
surface collection. These tests produced no other
artifacts.
Wesvanco Tract, Vance County
Site 31VN258 is an isolated occurrence of
two harnmerstones. The site is located 800 feet east of
Martin Creek Road and 200 feet west of the north-
south dirt road that runs through the tract. The site is
situated on a terrace approximately 600 feet north of a
finger of Martin's Creek. The central UTM
coordinates are N4018770 E734440 and the elevation
is 450 feet AMSL.
The site was located during a pedestrian survey
of a recent bulldozer cut through a forested area (Figure
32 ). The two hammerstones were located within an
area measuring 15 feet by 10 feet. No other artifacts
The site is located on Appling sandy loam with
2 to 8% slopes. Typical Appling soils have ten inches
of an A horizon of brown (10YR5/3) sandy loam
overlying a B horizon of yellowish brown (10YR6/8)
sandy clay loam. The shovel test soils at site 1 showed
some depletion of the A horizon.
The data sets present at 31VN258 include
only two non-diagnostic hthics in a recently disturbed
area. Although these types of artifacts are uncommon
isolated occurrences, testing produced no other
artifacts, suggesting that the site includes only these
two artifacts. Due to the lack of diagnostic artifacts,
the only research questions that could be formulated are
very broad, and would not be considered significant. In
addition, the data set is insufficient to
o
BULLDOZER CUT O,, O O
O O
Woom
0
p O O NEGATIVE sNOVELTEST
er5s
SCALE IN FEET - ' SURFACE SCATTER
Figure 32. Map of 31VN258, Wesvanco tract.
address research questions. It is
unlikely that he site has the potential
to produce artifacts that can address
important research questions, as
testing revealed no other artifacts.
For these reasons, site is
recommended as ineligible for
inclusion on the National Register
and no further management work is
recommended.
Site 31VN259" is a
historic cemetery located 750 feet east
of Martin Creek Road and 100 feet
west of the dirt road that runs through
the tract. The central UTM
coordinates are N4018720 E734450.
The cemetery is situated in a clearing
surrounded by mixed hardwoods and
kudzu (Figure 33). Three historic
structures are located 200 feet
southeast of the cemetery. The
cemetery consists of approximately 30
53
C7

•
gravestones, fieldstones, and temporary markers. These
visible markers cover an area measuring approximately
90,000 ft2, although it is likely that there are
unmarked graves located in the area. The two most
common surnames on the cemetery markers are Abbott
and Wormack, and many of these stones date to the
late nineteenth and twentieth century. The eroded field
stones present at the cemetery suggest that the cemetery
is older than the dates shown on the stones.
Cemeteries are often viewed in the context of
historic places, design, landscape, or historic people
under National Register Criteria A, 8, and C.
However, National Register BAtin 41 clearly indicates
that cemeteries can and should be assessed under
Criteria D as sites that have yielded or may be likely to
yield information in prehistory and history. Under
Criterion D, a cemetery's eligibility assessed through
steps similar to archaeological site assessment. First,
the site's data sets are identified. These would include
54
grave goods, coffin hardware, human remains,
landscape features, coffin remains, or associated
plantings. Second, the historic context applicable to
the cemetery must be identified in order to provide a
framework for the evaluative process. The known
historic context for this cemetery ranges from the late
nineteenth century to the twentieth century, and
possibly earlier. Third, important research questions
that the cemetery may be able to address, given the data
sets and context must be identified. Given the context
of the cemetery, there are a number of important
research questions addressing socioeconomic status,
social organization, ethnicity, and burial rituals.
Fourth, the integrity of the cemetery must be addressed
to ensure that the data sets are well preserved to address
the research questions. The positioning of the stones
indicates that the cemetery has good integrity and has
not been altered.
This analysis indicates that the cemetery has
0
IN'T'ENSIVE ARCHAEOLOGICAL SURVEY OF THREE TRACTS IN NORTH CAROLINA

•
RESUL
the potential to address important research questions
and is therefore recommended as potentially eligible for
the National Register of Historic Places. While it is
possible that construction can be undertaken outside of
the cemetery, we strongly recommend that before any
ground disturbing activities take place in the vicinity of
the cemetery, a pentrometer study be undertaken to
determine the number of unmarked graves present and
the true extent of the
cemete
O
O '•`
INC
N225 - O O
N
MODERN
TRASH O
N200
-
O
O
e
WOODS
ti
WOODS
O
0 25 50
SCALE IN FEET
I
E200
• POSITIVE SHOVEL TEST
O NEGATIVE SHOVEL TEST
- - SURFACE SCATTER
Figure 34. Map of site 31VN260", Wesvanco tract.
ry•
S i t e
31VN260" is a
historic site located
along a dirt road that
runs through the
We9vanco tract,
approximately 700
feet east of Martin's
Creek Road and
2,500 feet north of a
finger of Martin's
Creek. The central
UTM coordinates are
N4019320 E734530
and the elevation is
480 feet AMSL.
The site was
located near two large
piles of modern trash
(Figure 34). A
surface scatter of
historic artifacts was
noted in a clearing
west of the dirt road.
The majority of the
scatter was
concentrated less than
10 feet west of the
road and appeared to
have been recently
bulldozed. A small
sample of artifacts was
collected from the
scatter and included a
whole blue bottle with
a rusted cap, a small
clear glass bottle, and
a whiteware plate rim.
The 47/9-inch blue
55

•
•
bottle reads "GENUINE PHILLIPS MADE IN
USA" on the bottom. This bottle most likely
represents a Phillips Milk of Magnesia bottle which was
introduced in 1924 (Fike 1987:141). The small clear
bottle measures 2'h-inches and may represent a
medicine or toiletry bottle. Shovel tests were placed at
the edge of the scatter in a cruciform pattern to
determine the subsurface extent of the site. Two
positive shovel tests produced two pieces of blue on
white porcelain and a mills glass cap which measures 2-
inches in diameter. The cap reads "BRISTOL-
MEYERS CO. MUM® NET WT.42 OZ. MADE
IN U.S.A. NEW YORK NY." No information could
be located on this particular bottle cap, although the
"Mum" product was originally produced by George B.
Evans of Philadelphia and sold for 25 cents in 1926.
These artifacts suggest that the site was occupied in the
early twentieth century.
The site is located on Appling sandy loam,
56
which generally has ten inches of a brown (10YR5/3)
sandy loam A horizon overlying a B horizon of
yellowish brown (10YR6/8) sandy clay loam. The
shovel tests soils were consistent with this typical
description for Appling sandy loam. The data
sets collected from the site include medicine and
toiletry bottles and ceramics. A number of kitchen
group artifacts were also located in the surface scatter,
but were not collected. The artifacts recovered from the
site suggest that it was occupied in the first half of the
twentieth century. There are a number of important
research questions that early twentieth century sites
may address. For example, questions regarding site
function, socio-economic status, ethnicity and
consumer choice are pertinent research topics for
twentieth century sites. However, this site does not
appear to have the integrity necessary to address
research questions based on the recent disturbance of
the site. For this reason, we recommend the site as
ineligible for placement on the National Register. No

INTENSWE ARCHAEOLOGICAL. SURVEY OF THREE TRACTS IN NORTH CAROLINA
•
•
further management work is needed.
Historic Resources 1, 2, and 3 are situated
in the southern portion of the tract along the dirt road
that runs through the tract. These structures, shown
on the Henderson, NC 1970PR82 topographic quad
map. They are located 1,000 feet east of Martin's
Creek Road, and 300 feet north of a finger of Martin's
Creek. The central UTM coordinates are N4018530
E734475.
These three structures appear to be a house
and two outbuildings, although these structures are so
dilapidated that it is difficult to determine their
function. The area surrounding these structures is
littered with modern refuse and camper tops. Historic
Resource 1 appears to have been a two story building
with machine cut wood siding and a tin roof. The
building has been overtaken by kudzu (Figure 35), and
it was not possible to see more of the structure's detail.
Historic Resource 2 was in a worse state of decay than
Historic Resource 1. This structure is located
approximately 50 feet north of Historic Resource 1.
The only visible details of the structure are the metal
roofing and machine cut wood siding seen in Figure
36. This structure may have been a house, but it was
very difficult to decisively determine the function of this
building. Historic Resource 3, located approximately
75 feet northeast of Historic Resource 2 appears to
have been a storage building. The remnants of this
structure consist of band and machine cut roofing
supports, machine cut roofing planks, and concrete
foundations (Figure 37).
These historic resources do not possess the
significance necessary for inclusion on the National
Register of Historic Places. For this reason, we
recommend Historic Resources 1, 2, and 3 as
ineligible. No further management work is recommend
for these resources.
57
0
RESULTS
•
•
58
INTENSTVE ARCHAEOLOGICAL SURVEY OF THREE TRACTS IN NORTH CAROLINA
•
SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATIONS
r -I
L--.A
The Long, Hickory, and Wesvanco tracts in
Edgecom6e, Nash, and Vance Counties respectively,
were surveyed in order to locate and record
archaeological sites and historic resources present on
the tracts. The surveys were conducted using shovel
tests along transects spaced at 100-foot intervals in
100 or 200-foot increments. In addition, under
conditions of excellent ground visibility, pedestrian
surveys were also undertaken.
The survey tracts are located in the Piedmont
and the Coastal Plain. The topography of the
Piedmont is characterized by gently sloping to
moderately steep hills. In the Coastal Plain, the
topography is generally flat with grades of less than 2%.
Where slopes are present they are usually associated
with a waterway and often with its resulting erosion.
The survey tracts included a variety of natural
and man-made environments, including cultivated and
fallow agricultural fields, planted pine forests, mixed
pine/hardwood forests, and wetlands. The Long tract
consisted of pines with a dense hardwood understory
and cultivated and fallow fields. A finger of Walnut
Creek creates a small wetland area in the northeastern
portion of Long tract. The Hickory tract consisted
entirely of cultivated fields, with a few small
intermittent streams running through the tract. The
eastern portion of the tract is bordered by Beaverdam
Swamp. The Wesvanco tract included pine and oak
dominated forests, and herbaceous vegetation, especially
kudzu. The southern portion of the tract is bordered by
Martin's Creek and a few small fingers of this drainage
create wetlands in Wesvanco tract.
As a result of the archaeological survey of
Long tract, three sites and one historic resource were
located and recorded. Of these sites and resources,
further documentation is recommended for Historic
Resource 1 before any construction activities are
undertaken at this tract. The remainder are not
recommended as eligible for inclusion on the National
Register of Historic Places and no further management
work is recommended for these other sites and
resources.
Historic Resource 1 is located at the corner of
Kingsboro Road and Highway 64A. There are two
standing structures, a house and a storage building
which are currently in use, that will require further
documentation prior to development of the Long tract.
This documentation is recommended due to the
condition of the buildings and the uncommon nature
of the storage building. Further documentation, which
would include additional photographing and researching
of the property, would add to our understanding of the
area's economic history and distribution of goods.
A total of seven sites and a historic resource
were located and recorded at the Hickory tract in Nash
County. Of these sites and resource, only one, site
31NS90, is recommended as potentially eligible
because this site has the potential to address significant
research questions pertaining to the Archaic and
Woodland Periods. In order to further assess the site's
eligibility for the National Register, we recommend that
further archaeological testing be undertaken.
Specifically, a number of excavation units should be
opened, in addition to intensive surface collection.
Until such work can be undertaken, the site should be
avoided by all construction activities. No further
management work is recommended for the other sites
and historic resource.
The Wesvanco tract produced a total of three
sites and three historic resources. Site 31VN259 a
historic cemetery, is recommended as potentially
eligible. Based on the markers, the cemetery has been
used since the nineteenth century. We recommend
that a pentrometer survey and historical research be
undertaken to determine the extent of the cemetery's
boundaries prior to any ground disturbing activities in
59
0
INTENSIVE ARCHAEOLOGICAL SURVEY OF THREE TRACTS IN NORTH CAROLINA
this area. It is very lilzely, given the presence of eroded
fieldstones at the edge of the cemetery, that there are a
number of unmarked graves that would be disturbed by
any ground disturbing activity near the cemetery. This
work would help further assess the cemetery's eligibility
for the National Register of Historic Places. No
further management wort is recommended for the
other sites and historic resources.
It is possible that archaeological remains may
be encountered in other portions of the survey tracts
during construction activities. Construction crews
should be advised to report any discoveries of
concentrations of artifacts (such as bottles, ceramics, or
projectile points) or brick rubble to the project engineer,
who should in turn report the material to the North
Carolina State Historic Preservation Office or to the
client's archaeologist. No construction should take
place in the vicinity of these late discoveries until they
have been examined by an archaeologist.

60
0
•
SOURCES CITED
•
Abbott, Lawrence E., Jr., John S. Cable, Mary Beth
Reed, and Erica E. Sanborn
1995 An Archaeological Survey and Testing
of the McLean-Thompson Property
Land Acquisition, and theAmbulatory
Health Care Clinic Project, Fort
Bragg, Cumberland County, North
Carolina. Technical Report 349.
New South Associates, Stone
Mountain, Georgia.
Allison, John B.
1989 Soil Survey of Nash County, North
Carolina. U.S.D.A., Soil
Conservation Service, Washington,
D.C.
Anderson, David G.
1990 A North American Paleoindian
Projectile Point Database. Current
Research in the Pleistocene 7:67-69.
1992a A History of Paleoindian and Early
Archaic Research in the South
Carolina Area. In Paleoindian and
Early Archaic Period Research in the
Lower Southeast: A South Carolina
Perspective, edited by David G.
Anderson, Kenneth E. Sassaman,
and Christopher Judge, pp. 7-18.
Council of South Carolina
Professional Archaeologists,
Columbia.
1992b Models of Paleoindian and Early
Archaic Settlement in the Lower
Southeast. In Paleoindian and Early
Archaic Period Research in the Lower
Southeast: A South Carolina
Perspective, edited by David G.
Anderson, Kenneth E. Sassaman,
and Christopher judge, pp. 28-47.
Council of South Carolina
Professional Archaeologists,
Columbia.
Brennan, Louis A.
1982 A Compilation of Fluted Points of
Eastern North America by County
and Distribution: An AENA
Project. Archaeology of Eastern North
America 10:27-46.
Brooks, Richard D. and David Colin Crass
1991 A Desperate Poor Country: History
and Settlement Patterning on the
Savannah River Site, Aileen and
Barnwell Counties, South Carolina.
Savannah River Archaeological
Research Papers 2.Occasional
Papers of the Savannah River
Archaeological Research Program,
South Carolina Institute of
Archaeology and Anthropology,
University of South Carolina.
Cable, John S.
1982 Differences in Lithic Assemblages of
Forager and Collector Strategies. In
Archaeological Survey and
Reconnaissance Within the Ten-Year
Floodpool Harry S. Truman Dam and
Reservoir, edited by Richard Taylor.
Report Submitted to the U. S. Army
Corps of Engineers, Kansas City
District
Canouts, Veletta, and Albert C. Goodyear
1985 Litbic Scatters in the South
Carolina Piedmont. In Structure and
Process in Southeastern Archaeology,
edited by R. S. Dickens, Jr. and
61
40
INTENSIVE ARCHAEOLOGICAL SURVEY OF THREE TRACTS IN NORTH CAROLINA
H. T. Ward, pp. 180-194. American Legacy. University of
University of Alabama Press, North Carolina Press, Chapel Hill.
University.
Daniel, I. Randolph, Jr.
Chapman, Jefferson 1992 Early Archaic Settlement in the
1977 Archaic Period Research in the Lower Southeast: A North Carolina
Little Tennessee River Valley, 1975: Perspective. In Paleoindian and Early
Icehouse Bottom, Harrison Branch, Archaic Period Research in the Lower
Thirty Acre Island, Calloway Island. Southeast: A South Carolina
Report of Investigations 18. Perspective, edited by David G.
University of Tennessee, Knoxville. Anderson, Kenneth E. Sassaman,
and Christopher judge, pp. 68-
1985a Archaeology and the Archaic Period 77.Council of South Carolina
in the Southern Ridge-and-Valley professional Archaeologists,
Province. In Structure and Process in Columbia.
Southeastern Archaeology, edited by
Roy S. Dickens and H. Trawick Davis, John D.
Ward, pp. 137-179. The University 1987 Early Woodland of the North
of Alabama Press, University. Carolina Piedmont: New
Information from the E. Davis Site.
1985b Tellico Archaeology: 12,000 Years of Paper presented at the 44th
Native American History. Reports of Southeastern Archaeological
Investigations 43, Occasional Paper Conference, Charleston, South
5. University of Tennessee, Carolina.
Knoxville.
DeBow, J.D.B.
Coe, )offre L. 1854 Statistical View of the United States.
1952 The Cultural Sequence of the A.O.P. Nicholson, Washington,
Carolina Piedmont. In Archaeology D.C.
of the Eastern United States, edited
by James B. Griffin, pp. 301-311. Dickens, Roy S., Jr.
University of Chicago Press, 1976 Cherokee Prehistory: The Pisgah
Chicago. Phase in the Appalachian Summit
Region. University of Tennessee
Coe, Joffre L. Press, Knoxville.
n.d. The Poole Site: Randolph County.
Ms. on file, Research Laboratories of Ferguson, Leland G.
Anthropology, University of North 1971 South Appalachian Mississippian.
Carolina, Chapel Hill. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation,
University of North Carolina at
1964 The Formative Cultures of the Carolina Chapel Hill. University Microfilms,
Piedmont. Transaction of the Ann Arbor.
American Philosophical Society
54(5), Ferguson, Terry A.
1980 Prehistoric Soapstone Procurement in
Coe, Joffre L., editor Northwestern South Carolina.
1995 Town Creek Indian Mound: ANative Unpublished M.A. Thesis,

62
1?1
u

SOURCES CITED
Department of Anthropology,
University of Tennessee, Knoxville.
Fike, Richard E.
1987 The Battle Book. Gibbs M. Smith,
Inc., Salt Lake City.
Lautzenkeiser
1999 Archaeological Survey Proposed
Belmont Farms Subdivision, Nash
County, North Carolina. Coastal
Carolina Research, Tarboro, North
Carolina.
Gade, Ole, H. Daniel Stillwell, and Art Rex
1986 North Carolina: People and
Environments. GEO-APP, Boone,
North Carolina.
Gardner, Paul S.
1990 Excavations at the Amity Site: Final
Report of the Pomeiooc Project: 1984-
1989. Archaeological Research
Report 7. Archaeology Laboratory,
East Carolina University, Greenville,
North Carolina.
Goodwin, Roy A., Jr.
1979 Soil Survey of Edgecombe County,
North Carolina. U.S.D.A., Soil
Conservation Service, Washington,
D.C.
Goodyear, Albert C., John H. House, and Neal W.
Acleerly
1979 Laurens-Anderson: An Archaeological
Study of the Inter-Riverine Piedmont.
Anthropological Studies 4,
Occasional Papers of the Institute of
Archaeology and Anthropology,
University of South Carolina,
Columbia.
Gunn, Joel D. and Kathy Wilson.
1993 Archaeological Data Recovery
Investigations at Sites 38CT54 and
38CT58 Along the S.C. Jefferson
Bypass, chesterfield County, South
Carolina. Garrow and Associates,
Raleigh. Submitted to the S.C.
Department of Highways and Public
Transportation, Columbia.
Holm, Mary Ann, Shane C. Paterson, and Loretta
Lautzenheiser, Loretta, Mary Ann Holm, Jane
McManus Eastman, and Jody Carter
1996 . Archaeological Survey, Kerr Lake
Wilderness Camp, Vance County,
North Carolina. Coastal Carolina
Research, Tarboro, North Carolina.
Lee, W.D.
1934 North Carolina Erosion Survey.
U.S.D.A., Soil Conservation
Service, Washington, D.C.
Lefler, Hugh Talmage and Albert Ray Newsom
1954 North Carolina: The History of a
Southern State. University of North
Carolina Press, Chapel Hill.
Michie, James L.
1977 Early Man in South Carolina.
Honor's Thesis, Department of
Anthropology, University of South
Carolina.
Mooney, James
1894 The Siouan Tribes of the East.
Bulletin 22. Smithsonian
Institution, Bureau of Ethnology,
Washington, D.C.
Oliver, Billy L.
1981 The Piedmont Tradition: Refinement
of the Savannah River Stemmed Point
Type. Unpublished Master's thesis,
Department of Anthropology,
University of North Carolina,
Chapel HE
1985 Tradition and Typology: Basic
Elements of the Carolina Projectile
Point Sequence. In Structure and
63
0
• I)\YTENSIVE ARCHAEOLOGICAL SURVEY O TTH REE TRACTS IN NORTH CAROLINA
Process in Southeastern Archaeology,
Carolina.
edited by Roy S. Dickens and H.
The
211
5
1983 Archaeology of the North Carolina
.
-
Trawick ward, pp. 19 Coast and Coastal Plain: Problems
University of Alabama Press, and Hypotheses. In Tle Prehistory of
University. North Carolina: An Archaeological
1992 Settlements of the Pee Dee Culture. Symposium, edited by Mary A.
Mathis and Jeffrey J. Crow, pp. I-
Unpublished Ph.D. Dissertation, North Carolina Division of
52
University of North Carolina at
Chapel Hill. University Microfilms, .
Archives and History, Department
of Cultural Resources, Raleigh.
Ann Arbor.
Peck, Rodney M.
Points of Early Man in North
i
Cl 1984 Archaeology of the Tillett Site: The
Community at
hin
Fi
F
ov
s
1988
Carolina. American Anthropologist g
s
irst
Wanchese, Roanoke Island.
12:425-433. Archaeological Research Report 6.
Archaeology Laboratory,
Parkinson, Phil Department of Sociology,

Points:
1971 Norte Carolina Fluted
Anthropology, and Economics, East
One.
Survey Report Number Carolina University, Greenville,
Southern Indian Studies 23:3-40. North Carolina.

1973 Norte Carolina Fluted Points: Reid, James Jefferson, Jr.
1967 Pee Dee Pottery from the Mound at
Survey Report Number Two. Town Creek. Unpublished M.A.
Southern Indian Studies 25:3-60. thesis. Department of Anthropology,
University of North Carolina at
Phelps, David S.
ical Salvage of the Thorpe
olo
h
A Chapel Hill.
g
ae
rc
1980
Site and Other Investigations Along Rights, Douglas L.
g
the U.S. 64 Bypass, Rocky Mount,
ical
lo
h
A 1947 The American Indian in North
W
g
aeo
rc
North Carolina. inston-
Carolina. John F. Blair,
Research Report 1. Archaeology Salem, North Carolina.
Laboratory, East Carolina
University, Greenville, Nortll
Sassaman, Kenneth E.

Carolina. S
1983 Middle andLate Archaic Settlementin
the South Carolina Piedmont.
1981 Archaeological Surveys of Four Unpublished Master's thesis.
Watersheds in the North Carolina Department of Anthropology,
Coastal Plain. North Carolina University of South Carolina,
Archaeological Council Publication Columbia.
No. 16. Raleigh.
1993 Early Pottery in the Southeast:
1982 A Summary of Colington Phase Sites Tradition and Innovation in Cooking
in the Tidewater Zone of North Technology. University of Alabama
Carolina. Archaeology Laboratory, University.
Press
Department of Sociology and ,
Anthropology, East Carolina 1995 The Cultural Diversity of
University, Greenville, North Interactions Among Mid-Holocene
64
•
SOURCES CITED
Societies of the American
Southeast. In Native American
Interactions: Multiscalar Analyses and
Interpretations in the Eastern
woodlands, edited by bl. S.
Nassanmey and K. E. Sassaman.
University of Tennessee Press,
Knoxville.
Sassaman Kenneth E. and David G. Anderson
1990 Typology and Chronology. In Native
American Prehistory of the Middle
Savannah River Valley, edited by
Kenneth E. Sassaman, Mark J.
Broo)zs, Glen T. Hanson, and David
G. Anderson, pp. 143-216.
Savannah River Archaeological
Research Publication 1. South
Carolina Institute of Archaeology
and Anthropology, University of
South Carolina, Columbia.
1994 Middle and Late Archaic
Archaeological Records of South
Carolina: A Synthesis for Research
and Resource Management. Council
of South Carolina Professional
Archaeologists, -Columbia.
Sassaman, Kenneth E., Marla J. Brooks, Glen T.
Hanson, and David G. Anderson
1990 Native American Prehistory of the
Middle Savannah River Valley.
Savannah River Archaeological
Research Publication 1. South
Carolina Institute of Archaeology
and Anthropology, University of
South Carolina, Columbia.
Service, Elman R.
1966 The Hunters. Prentice-Hall,
Englewood Cliffs, New )ersey.
Anthropology, University of North
Carolina, Chapel Hill.
State Board of Agriculture
1896 North Carolina and Its Resources. M.
1. & J. C. Stewart Public Printers,
Winston-Salem.
Stimpson, Jerry V., Roy L. Mathis, Jr., William 1.
Shope, Joel W. Cawthorn, and David Clapp
1980 Soil Survey of Vance County, North
Carolina. U.S.D.A., Soil
Conservation Service, Washington,
D.C.
Tippitt, V. Ann, and William H. Marquardt
1982 A Preliminary Report of the First
Excavation Season at the Gregg
Shoals Site (9EB259), Elbert
County, Georgia. South Carolina
Antiquities 14:1-24.
Trimble, Stanley W.
1974 Man-Induced Soil Erosion on the
Southern Piedmont, 1700-1970. Soil
Conservation Society of America,
Ankey, Iowa.
Ward, H. Trawick
1983 A Review of Archaeology in the
North Carolina Piedmont: A Study
of Change. In The Prehistory of
North Carolina: An Archaeological
Symposium, edited by Mark A.
Mathis and Jeffrey J. Crow, pp. 53-
82. North Carolina Division of
Archives and History, Raleigh.
Walthall, John A.
1980 Prehistoric Indians of the Southeast:
Archaeology of Alabama. University
of Alabama Press, Tuscaloosa.
South, Stanley
1959 A Study of the Prehistory of the
Roanoke Rapids Basin. Master's
thesis, Department of Sociology and
White, Max E.
1979 Archaeological Survey: John H. Kerr
Dam and Reservoir. Soil Systems,
Inc., Marietta, Georgia.
65
11
INTENSIVE ARCHAEOLOGICAL SURVEY OF THREE TRACTS IN NORTH CAROLINA
Williams, Stephen B. (editor)
1965 The Paleoindian Era: Proceedings of
the 20th Southeastern
Archaeological Conference.
Southeastern Archaeological
Conference Bulletin 2.
Wilson, Jack H., Jr.
1983 A Study of the Late Prehistoric,
Protohistoric, and Historic Indians of
the Carolina and Virginia Piedmont.
Ph.D. Dissertation, University of
North Carolina at Chapel Hill.
University Microfilms, Ann Arbor.
•
66
r
0 ARCHAEOLOGICAL
INVESTIGATIONS I
HISTORIC
RESEARCH
PRESERVATION
I;
EDUCATION
INTERPRETATION
HERITAGE
MARKETING
MUSEUM SUPPORT
PROGRAMS

Chicora Foundation, Inc.
P.O. Box 8664 • 861 Arbutus Drive
'?`?{{?,--t^^^^ Columbia, South Carolina 29202-8664 I r
:?•? Tel: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]
www.chicors.org I
• ® Printed on Racycted Paper
i?
CULTURAL RESOURCES SURVEY OF A
50 ACRE TRACT IN HENDERSON,
VANCE COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
•
r? ~
'i
•?, i t- ...................
CHICORA RESEARCH CONTRIBUTION 321
r-1
U
CULTURAL RESOURCES SURVEY OF A
50 ACRE TRACT IN HENDERSON, VANCE COUNTY,
NORTH CAROLINA
Prepared By:
Michael Trinkley, Ph.D., RPA
Prepared For:
Mr. Tim Campbell
Carter Burgess
• 201 Brookfield Corporate Center
Greenville, South Carolina 29607
CHICORA RESEARCH CONTRIBUTION 321.
Chicora Foundation, Inc.
`? PO Box 8664
Columbia, SC 29202-8664
803/787-6910
Email: [e-mail]
www.chicora.org
0 February 15, 2001
This report is printed on permanent paper -

ABSTRACT

0
This study reports on an intensive cultural
resources survey of a 50 acre tract on the southern
outskirts of the town of Henderson in south central
Vance County, North Carolina. The work was conducted
to assist Carter Burgess comply with Section 106 of the
National Historic Preservation Act and the regulations
codified in 36CFR800.
The tract is being considered, along with an
adjacent previously surveyed parcel of about 200 acres, to
be used by a confidential client for the construction of a
major distribution center. The proposed tract is roughly
rectangular in shape, and situated on the northeastern
edge of what has been called the Wesvanco Tract. The
current survey parcel is bounded to the northeast by SR
1148 (Old Epsom Road). It consists of primarily fallow
fields, although stands of dense pine and mixed hardwood
forest are found in one upland area and in several
bottomland or depressional areas.
This survey was conducted to identify and assess
archaeological and historical sites which may be in the
project corridor. For this study an area of potential effect
(APE) 0.5 mile around the proposed tract was assumed.
The proposed undertaking will require clearing, grubbing,
and grading, along with the construction of both
underground utilities as well as industrial structures.
There will likely be short-term construction impacts,
including increased noise and dust levels, and increased
construction related traffic. The long-term affects will
primarily be limited to the study tract itself, although
there is potential for visual intrusion of nearby historic
properties.
Consultation with the North Carolina State
Historic Preservation Office, Architectural Branch,
revealed no previously identified architectural resources
within the 0.5 mile APE. Nor were there any previously
recorded National Register buildings, districts, structures,
sites, or objects in the study area. Consultation with the
Office of State Archaeology revealed no previously
identified archaeological sites in the study tract, or within
the proposed APE, other than those previously
identified by Chicora Foundation on the adjacent 200
acre parcel (31VN258, 31VN259 and 31VN260").
The archaeological study of the tract
incorporated shovel testing at 100-foot intervals on a
series of 18 transects. All shovel test fill was screened
through '/a-inch mesh and the shovel tests were
backfilled at the completion of the study. A total of 254
shovel tests were excavated in the survey tract.
Two sites were found as a result of the
investigation. 31VN261" represents a twentieth
century domestic scatter associated with a standing bam
and a modern well. Data sets are limited and site
integrity has been damaged by demolition. The site is
recommended not eligible for inclusion on the National
Register and no additional management activities are
recommended. Site31VN262" is a modem trash dump
found in the woods on the tract. The materials at this
site include plastics and styrofoam. Because the site is
less than 50 years old, we recommend it not eligible for
inclusion on the National Register. No other sites were
identified on the survey tract.
A survey of public roads within a half mile of
the proposed undertaking was conducted in an effort to
identify any architectural sites over 50 years old which
also retained their integrity. The survey revealed a
variety of modern structures, a mixture of commercial
and industrial facilities, and several trailer parks. Only
one structure potentially over 50 years was identified.
This building, a hall-and-parlor plan, has been
extensively modified. The front porch has been reworked
with replacement piers, the foundation has been
replaced with CMU, although the original stone
chimney is still standing. Overall the structure is in
dilapidated condition. We do not believe that it retains
sufficient integrity to be included in the statewide
survey. Regardless, the proposed undertaking will not
affect this structure, which is already surrounded by
modern houses.
There is also a dilapidated metal sided barn on
the survey tract. This bam, while incorporated into
archaeological sites 31VN261", does not appear to be
50 years old and is not recommended eligible.
Finally, it is possible that more archaeological
remains may he encountered in the corridor during
construction. Construction crews should be advised to
report any discoveries of concentrations of artifacts (such
as bottles, ceramics, or projectile points) or brick rubble
to the project engineer, who should in turn report the
material to the State Historic Preservation Office or to
Chicora Foundation (the process of dealing with late
discoveries is discussed in 36CFR800.13(b)(3)). No
construction should take place in the vicinity of these late
discoveries until they have been examined by an
archaeologist and, if necessary, have been processed
according to 36CFR800.13(b)(3).
E
r?
?J
•
List of Figures
Introduction
Natural Environment
Physiography
Geology and Soils
Climate
Floristics
Prehistoric and Historic Synopsis
Previous Research
Prehistoric Overview
Historic Overview
Methods
Archaeological Field Methods
Architectural Survey
Site Evaluation
Laboratory Analysis
Results of Survey
Introduction
Identified Archaeological Sites
Historic and Architectural Resources
Summary and Recommendations
Sources Cited
TABLE OF CONTENTS
5
5
6
7
9
9
17
21
22
22
23
25
25
31

iv
1
5
9
21
25
33
35
iii
LIST OF FIGURES
Figure
1. Project vicinity in Vance County
2. Project tract and previously identified archaeological sites
3. View of open areas on the project tract
4. View of open area showing evidence of plowing
5. Wooded area on the periphery of the project
6. Generalized cultural periods for North Carolina
7. Portion of Collet's A Compleat Map of North-Carolina showing the project area
8. Portion of the 1865 U.S. Coast Survey map of the project area
9. Plan of the study tract showing transects and identified sites
10. Sketch map of 31VN261""
11. View of 31VN261"
12. View of the barn at 31VN261
13. View of 31VN262"
14. Sketch map of 31VN262'"
15. Historic Resource 1
16. Historic Resource 1
1v
0
INTRODUCTION
•
•
This intensive archaeological survey of a 50
acre tract south of Henderson in south central Vance
County, North Carolina was conducted by Dr. Michael
Trinkley of Chicora Foundation, Inc. for Mr. Tim
Campbell of Carter Burgess in Greenville, South
Carolina. The work was conducted to assist Carter
Burgess comply with Section 106 of the National
Historic Preservation Act and the regulations codified
in 36CFR800.
The project area is located east of the US 1
Bypass of Henderson, west of NC 39 and north of
Martin Creek (Figure 1). The project site consists of a
roughly rectangular parcel measuring about 1,800 feet
on its northeast edge, which borders SR 1148 (Old
Epsom Road), 1,400 feet along its southeastern
boundary, 1,100 feet along a drainage on the southwest
border, and 1,500 feet along the northwestern edge
(Figure 2). The parcel is adjacent to the previously
surveyed 200 acre Wesvanco tract (Campo and Trinkley
1999).
The corridor consists of a generally level tract
which has been under cultivation. Within the past
several years it has been allowed to go fallow and at the
time of this study much of the parcel was in 3-foot high
grass. There is a slope to a drainage on the southeast
and south sides of the tract. While situated about 2.5
miles south of downtown Henderson, the project area is
marked by a number of industrial tracts and commercial
parcels interspersed among modest subdivisions and
trailer parks. This once rural section of Vance County
has been extensively developed.
The parcel, as previously mentioned, is
intended to be used along with an additional 200 acre
tract as a distribution center. The 200 acres to the west
and southwest have been previously surveyed, but no
construction has begun. The proposed work will involve
extensive clearing of the property, grubbing out of trees,
cutting and filling associated with grading, construction
of underground utilities (such as storm water drainage),
and the construction of large parking areas and major
warehouse facilities. The work will cause extensive
damage to any archaeological remains which may be
present - necessitating this survey.
Construction, operation, and maintenance of
the facility may also have an impact on historic
resources in the project area. The project will remove
only one structure, a harp which is not yet 50 years old,
the completed facility may detract from the visual
integrity of historic properties, creating what many
consider discordant surroundings. As a result, this
architectural survey uses an area of potential effect
(APE) about 0.5 mile radius around the proposed
survey tract. We believe that this APE is adequate,
considering the extensive commercial and industrial
development which has already taken place in the
immediate area.
This study, however, does not consider any
future secondary impact of the project, including
increased or expanded commercial, industrial, or
residential development of this section of the North
Carolina Piedmont. Again, given the extensive pre-
existing development in the immediate area, it would be
difficult to determine if any future developments were
directly linked to this project.
We were requested by Mr. Tim Campbell of
Carter Burgess to provide a proposal for the survey of
this tract on January 20, 2001 and we submitted a
proposal on January 23. Authorization to conduct the
survey was provided shortly thereafter. These
investigations incorporated a review of the site files at
the North Carolina State Historic Preservation Office,
Architectural Survey, as well as at the State Office of
Archaeology.
The only previously recorded archaeological
sites in the project area are those which were identified
by Chicora Foundation on the original 200 acre survey
(Campo and Trinkley 1999). Site 31VN258 consisted
CULTURAL RESOURCES SURVEY OF A 50 ACRE TRACT IN HENDERSON
a INTRODUCTION
0
•
/ ? 11
a?C
IFC
fit` \ V
,I IIX,. X500
rie??tSC JJ'-?y .' '?', 1 V /???/ fl 7 `rJo_• ? I?

• II ,L' II ?? . i ? 1
I Ce ;? hapel?' l - a r/? ? ' o`.? ? III}J • 538 • ? :; / li V
p II • s$ I , • •/?
• ~ °y \ SURVEY TRACT,
?? (\ u • n j
P.
? soo • -? s u!I ? C
o ,\ o C
WESVANCO TRACT
II -
11 1 ?
•, ? s? I 5? 11 llo' yho ?, 4yo Fr
r
.116
?? ' ? ? • 0 = ` '?\ , rte' , I` '?
Il AB 51
? )$ I II ???? v I \ 11 r I ? III,
-?' l 15
q \ ?i 1 1 ? r"? u' :? h
?.-?,\ q l III °? /
cVV • `•' pd• t, • 0 • ?J ??? \\1 5 ?` IP O /-' II ? t•J\?ll
111 ?./1
'
gyp ~ L/ Ste l ,• IIi?Z\... I
-
33!!JJ _ r Ord i
10 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000
?'\`C ?J i, ' • 4\ n? SCALE IN FEET
Figure 2. Project tract and previously identi&d archaeological sites (basemap is USGS Henderson 7.5').
3
CULTURAL RESOURCES SURVEY OF A 50 ACRE TRACT IN HENDERSON
of two isolated hammerstones and the site was
recommended not eligible. Site 31VN259" was
identified as a historic cemetery which was
recommended potentially eligible for inclusion on the
National Register of Historic Places. Prior to any
ground disturbing activities, we recommended that
further work be undertaken at this site to determine the
possibility of unmarked graves and the true extent of the
cemetery. In particular we recommended careful
buffering of the site to prevent any potential damage to
the graves, especially since there was a high likelihood of
unmarked graves. The final site, 31VN260", was a
historic site associated with abundant trash. It was
recommended not eligible based on the lack of integrity
and modern age.
interior stone chimney. It bas, however, unde
extensive modifications and no longer pose
architectural integrity. As a result we reeommer
structure not eligible.
Report production was conducted at Chi
laboratories in Columbia, South Carolina
February 9 and 12.
Three dilapidated historic structures were also
identified during the original survey. The buildings,
however, were not associated with archaeological
remains and lacked the integrity necessary for eligibility
as architectural sites. They were recommended not
eligible. Our review of the architectural site files failed
to identify any other previously recorded architectural
sites in the project's 0.5 mile APE.
This background work suggests that prehistoric
sites are not likely to be common in the immediate
survey area. The only major drainage is Martin Creek,
outside of the immediate survey area. Historic sites
seem to be limited to relatively modern (post-1940)
farm and tenant complexes.
Archival and historical research was limited to
a review of secondary sources available in the Chicora
Foundation files, as well as research at the Office of
State Archaeology.
The archaeological survey was conducted on
February 6 and 7, 2001 by Ms. Nicole Southerland
and Mr. Tom Covington. The survey revealed two
previously unrecorded archaeological sites, both of which
are recommended not eligible for the National Register.
The architectural survey of the APE, designed
to determine if there were historic sites in the APE, was
conducted on February 8. This only one potentially
historic structure in the APE. The one building clearly
evidences a basic through-ball plan, as well as an
4
•
NATURAL ENVIRONMENT
•
0 intermittent drainage along the southwestern edge.
PhysiograRhy
The 50 acre addition to the 200 acre
Wesvanco tract is situated in Vance County, southeast
of Henderson. It is bordered to the west by the 200 acre
tract and to the south by a small intermittent drainage.
To the northwest is SR 1148 (Old Epsom Road).
Opposite the tract, on the west side of US 1, is existing
industrial development, while the surrounding area is
mixed agricultural and residential with pockets of
commercial development.
Vance County is situated entirely within the
piedmont. It is rectangular in shape, oriented north-
south, and is situated in the north-central part of North
Carolina, on the Virginia border. Vance contains 249
square miles and is bordered to the west by Granville
County, to the east by Warren, and to the south and
southeast by Franklin County. One of the major
drainages in the county was dammed for the creation of
John H. Kerr Reservoir (originally the Buggs Island
Reservoir) in 1944. The Tar River forms the boundary
between Vance and Franklin counties.
The piedmont, located between the mountain
and coastal plain regions, is an area of dendritic
drainage and red clay. Robertson (1960:61) identifies
the area as a peneplain, dissected by moderately swift
streams flowing south or southwest. The name
11 piedmont" means "foot of the mountains," which
describes the general topography: a rolling eroded
plateau with rounded bills and low ridges (Gade et al.
1986:146). Vance County is gently sloping to rolling
and, in many areas, has fairly broad ridges. The original
Wesvanco tract, to the west of this additional 50 acres,
is steeply sloped, tending southward toward Martin
Creek. Elevations ranging from 500 feet AMSL at the
northern edge to about 450 feet AMSL at the southern
end. The 50 acre addition is very similar in topography.
There is a small drainage running southeast along the
eastern edge of the parcel. In addition, there is an
Elevations in the tract range from about 460 to 495
feet AMSL.
Vance is classified by Gades and his colleagues
as within the Piedmont Lowlands - "an area of down-
faulted basins filled with younger, unaltered sedimentary
rocks and displaying more fully dissected surface terrain
than the Piedmont Uplands" (Gade et al. 1986:146).
The area, geologically, exhibits greater diversity, but
includes part of the Carolina Slate Belt and the range
of lithic materials attractive to early occupants of the
region.
Geology and. Soils
As previously mentioned, the piedmont's
landscape has a rolling surface of gentle to steep slopes.
Each peneplain is cut or bounded by valleys of even
steeper slopes which often have a depth of several
hundred feet. This landscape is most noticeable in the
interior, away from the Fall Line edge, where the effects
of increased erosion are clearer. As you move toward the
mountainous Blue Ridge peneplain development
becomes more incomplete and monadnocks more
abundant.
Perhaps the most significant feature of the
piedmont's geology is its effect on prehistoric lithic
technology. Quartz is the most abundant material,
being found in the Kings Mountain formation and also
readily available as veins in the crystalline gneisses and
schists which underlie (and yield through
decomposition) the red clays of the nearby piedmont
uplands. The quartz, how6ver, is harder than the
associated rocks and decomposes more slowly than the
surrounding matrix. As a result, vein quartz often
appears on the surface or very near to the surface. The
metavolcanics, such as argillite and rhyolite, are widely
available from localized outcroppings of the Carolina
Slate Belt, west of the project area. Of particular
importance are the cryptocrystalline deposits which
supply the best materials for knapping. Although other
CULTURAL RESOURCES SURVEY OF A 50 ACRE TRACT IN HENDERSON
Figure 3. View of open area comprising the majority of the survey tract.
materials, such as chalcedony and even chert, are
occasionally found as tools in this section of the North
Carolina Piedmont, these materials are extra-local,
coming from either nearby counties or, in the case of
chert, from either Tennessee or western North
Carolina.
The 50 acre addition to the Wesvanco project
area consists of only one defined soil series, Appling
sandy loath with 2-8% slopes. The Appling soils have a
brown (10YR5/3) sandy loam Ap horizon about 0.9
foot in depth resting on a yellowish-brown (10YR5/8)
clay loam B horizon (Stimpson et al. 1980:41-42).
Taking into consideration the entire project
area, about 13% of the soils are classified by the Soil
Conservation Service as eroded, with the loss of all of
the original A horizon and, in many cases, some of the
underlying B horizon. The causes can be traced to poor
farming practices, such as shallow plowing and limited
crop rotation, and the conversion of rural areas to
residential subdivisions, shopping malls, industrial
complexes and highway systems (Dade et al. 1986:149).
Areas of exposed red clay or gullies were noted in several
areas of the study tract, demonstrating the fragile
nature of the piedmont.
Vance
is part of what
(1974) calls i
Tobacco Planti
He observes
area generally
fairly high ero
use history whic
in the late ni
century. In spit
he projects thal
was likely 0.5
less.
By the
Great Depress
Soil Con
Service chat
much of sou
Vance
including the
area, as exhibiting "moderate sheet erosion.
northwest, where slopes were steeper, ero
significantly worse (Lee 1934).
This suggests that the archaeological
of the tract, most especially in those areas c
slopes, may be affected by previous erosional
This situation is consistent with the findin
shovel tests - as well as the findings of the
survey (Campo and Trinkley 1999). Althot
areas were identified lacking an A horizon, it v
(albeit deflated) over most of the 50 acre stud
Climate
Elevation and geography both a.
climate of the three study areas. The Ap
Mountains to the west of the county block
masses from the northwest, and elevation
piedmont area, ranging from 650 feet to 1,
AMSL, help maintain relatively mild temperat
mild, short winters and warm summers. Movi
coastal plain the winters still tend to be mile
summers are typically hot and humid because
maritime air.
In the piedmont, in the vicinity of tb
r?
LA
NATURAL ENVIRONMENT
Oalz-pine forests
account for most of the
forest acreage in the
area, although the
vegetation has been
dramatically altered from
the original or natural
potential vegetation
prior to the intervention
of European settlers.
Today, loblolly-shortleaf
pine forests are
abundant and include
red oak, white oak, gum,
hickory and yellow-
poplar trees.

0
of Vance County, July temperatures, generally the
warmest of the year, average between 66 and 89° F,
while January temperatures, generally the coldest of the
year, average about 28-51°F. The area is also
characterized by a humid climate with abundant rainfall,
averaging about 45 inches annually. The growing season
for most crops is during
the months of April
through September,
when 54% of the annual
rainfall occurs.
Floristies
The piedmont
is characterized by the
dominance of a pine
forest cover, due
primarily to three
centuries of human land
use in the region (Ciade
et al. 1986:8). Oaks,
hiclzories, and dogwoods
also characterize the
forests of the piedmont
(State Board of
Agriculture 1896:37)
The bullz of the
original Wesvanco
stic of deep plowing. survey tract was forested,
with pine and oalz
dominating. 't'hese same forests are found along the
western and southwestern edges of the 50 acre tract, as
well as in the drainage on the southeastern edge.
Elsewhere, however, the tract had been under
cultivation and was characterized by fallow, weedy
growth.
7-
7,',. igure 5. Wooded area on the

of the cultivated fields.
7
CULTURAL RESOURCES SURVEY OF A 50 ACRE TRACT IN HENDERSON
Where the oak-pine or oak-hickory forests are
developed, such as on midslopes and even several of the
ridgetops, the understory is not dramatic.
•
PREHISTORIC AND HISTORIC SYNOPSIS
•
f I
Previous Research
There are several previous cultural resource
management reports for the Vance County area (such
as our original study of the 200 acre Wesvanco Tract,
Campo and Trinkley 1999, and a study of facilities
around Kerr Lake in Vance County, Lautzenheiser et
al. 1996). Like elsewhere in North Carolina there has
been a mix of compliance studies, covering relatively
small areas, and longer-term research. In fact, research
in this northeastern corner of North Carolina, while
begun by Joffre Coe and his student, Stanley South, on
the basis of the Roanoke Rapids research in the 1950s
(South 1959 and Coe 1964), for many years afterward
was dominated by David Phelps and his students at East
Carolina University (for a synopsis see Phelps 1983).
Perhaps the most significant research in Vance
County, certainly the most extensive, was undertaken in
anticipation of the John H. Kerr Dam and Reservoir. A
range of Archaic and Woodland sites were found in both
North Carolina and Virginia with the bulk easily fitting
into the pre-existing chronology established by Coe and
his colleagues for the piedmont region (White 1979).
These investigations incorporated a review of
the files at the North Carolina Office of State
Archaeology. No previously recorded sites were found
within or immediately adjacent to any of the project
boundaries.
Prehistoric Overview
Overviews for North Carolinas prehistory, while
of differing lengths and complexity, are available in
virtually every compliance report prepared. There are, in
addition, some "classic" sources well worth attention, such
as Joffre Coe's Formative Cultures (Coe 1964), as well as
some general overviews (perhaps the best is that provided by
Ward and Davis 1999). These can be supplemented with
a broad range of theses and dissertations produced by
students of North Carolina's colleges and universities. Also
extremely helpful, perhaps even essential, are a handful of
recent local synthetic statements, such as that offered by
Sassaman and Anderson (1994) for the Middle and Late
Archaic. Only a few of the many sources are included in
this study, but they should be adequate to give the reader
a "feel" for the area and help establish a context for the
various sites identified in the study area. Figure 10 offers
a generalized view of North Carolina's cultural periods.
In the Carolina Piedmont, lithic scatters are the
most common type of prehistoric site encountered.
Goodyear et al. (1979:131-145) found that sites
containing lithic scatters located in the inter-riverine
Piedmont were geographically extensive and exhibited little
artifact diversity. These sites have been interpreted as:
limited or specialized activity sites
which represent resource exploitation
or other distinct functions. Nearly all
investigators working in the
Piedmont have related these sites to
activities involving hunting, nut
gathering, and procuring of lithic raw
materials (Canouts and Goodyear
1985:185).
Although the vast majority of these sites are located in
eroded areas and exhibit little to no subsurface integrity,
Canouts and Goodyear (1985) argue that they have
analytical value. This value lies in their horizontal
rather than vertical dimensions. They argue that:
future investigators of upland sites
must effect broad-scale spatial
analyses comparable to the temporal
analyses effected through excavation
of deeply stratified sites. Both
endeavors are necessary, and neither
is sufficient for the total
understanding of Piedmont
prehistory" (Canouts and Goodyear
1985: 193).
One observation that Canouts and Goodyear
9
10
CULTURAL RESOURCES SURVEY OF A 50 ACRE TRACT IN HENDERSON
0
0
•
PREHISTORIC AND HISTORIC SYNOPSIS
(1985) made is that lithic raw material ratios change
through time. For instance, at the Gregg Shoals site in
Elbert County, Georgia, the Early Archaic assemblage
reflects greater use of non-local cryptocrystalline
materials and the Late Archaic, greater use of non-
quartz local material (see Tippitt and Marquardt 1982).
Paleoindian Period
The Paleoindian Period, most commonly dated
from about 12,000 to 10,000 B.P., is evidenced by
basally thinned, side-notch projectile points; fluted,
lancelot projectile points; side scrapers; end scrapers;
and drills (Coe 1964; Michie 1977; Williams 1965).
Oliver (1981, 1985) has proposed to extend the
Paleoindian dating in the North Carolina Piedmont to
perhaps as early as 14,000 B.P., incorporating the
Hardaway Side-Notched and Palmer Corner-Notched
types, usually accepted as Early Archaic, as
representatives of the terminal phase. This view, verbally
suggested by Coe for a number of years, has
considerable technological appeal.' Oliver suggests a
continuity from the Hardaway Blade through the
Hardaway-Dalton to the Hardaway Side-Notched,
eventually to the Palmer Side-Notched (Oliver
1985:199-200). While convincingly argued, this
approach is not universally accepted.
The Paleoindian occupation, while widespread,
does not appear to have been intensive. Artifacts are
most frequently found along major river drainages,
which Michie interprets to support the concept of an
economy "oriented toward the exploitation of now
extinct mega-fauna" (Michie 1977:124). Survey data
for Paleoindian tools, most notably fluted points, is
rather dated for North Carolina (Brennan 1982; Peck
1988; Perkinson 1971, 1973; cf. Anderson 1990). In
spite of this, the distribution offered by Anderson
(1992b:Figure 5.1) reveals a rather general, and
widespread, occurrence throughout the region.
Distinctive projectile points may include
lancoelates such as Clovis, Dalton, perhaps the
Hardaway, and Big Sandy (Coe 1964; Phelps 1983;
Oliver 1985). A temporal sequence of Paleoindian
projectile points was proposed by Williams (1965:24-
51), but according to Phelps (1983:18) there is little
stratigraphic or chronometric evidence for it. While this
is certainly true, a number of authors, such as Anderson
(1992a) and Oliver (1985) have assembled impressive
data sets. We are inclined to believe that while often not
conclusively proven by stratigraphic excavations (and
such proof may be an unreasonable expectation), there
is a large body of circumstantial evidence. The weight of
this evidence tends to provide considerable support.
Unfortunately, relatively little is known about
Paleoindian subsistence strategies, settlement systems,
or social organization (see, however, Anderson 1992b
for an excellent overview and synthesis of what is
known). Generally, archaeologists agree that the
Paleoindian groups were at a hand level of society (see
Service 1966), were nomadic, and were both hunters
and foragers. While population density, based on
isolated finds, is thought to have been low, Walthall
suggests that toward the end of the period, "there was an
increase in population density and in territoriality and
that a number of new resource areas were beginning to
be exploited" (Walthall 1980:30).
Archaic Period
The Archaic Period, which dates from 10,000
to 3,000 B.P.2, does not form a sharp break with the
1 While never discussed by Coe at length, he did
observe that many of the Hardaway points, especially from the
lowest contexts, bad facial fluting or thinning which, "in cases
where the side-notches or basal portions were missing, .. .
could be mistaken for fluted points of the Paleo-Indian
period" (Coe 1964:64). While not an especially strong
statement, it does reveal the formation of the concept.
Further insight is offered by Ward's (1983:63) all too brief
comments on the more recent investigations at the Hardaway
site (see also Daniel 1992).
z The terminal point for the Archaic is no clearer
than that for the Paleoindian and many researchers suggest a
terminal date of 4,000 B.P, rather than 3,000 B.P. There is
also the question of whether ceramics, such as the fiber-
tempered Stallings ware, will be included as Archaic, or will
be included with the Woodland. Oliver, for example, argues
that the inclusion of ceramics with Late Archaic attributes
"complicates and confuses classification and interpretation
needlessly" (Oliver 1981:20). He comments that according to
the original definition of the Archaic, it "represents a
11
CULTURAL RESOURCES SURVEY OF A 50 ACRE TRACT IN HENDERSON
Paleoindian Period, but is a slow transition
characterized by a modern climate and an increase in
the diversity of material culture. Associated with this is
a reliance on a broad spectrum of small mammals,
although the white tailed deer was likely the most
commonly exploited animal. Archaic period
assemblages, exemplified by corner-notched and broad-
stemmed projectile points, are fairly common, perhaps
because the swamps and drainages offered especially
attractive ecotones.
Some researchers (see for example, Ward
1983:65) suggest that there was a noticeable population
increase from the Paleoindian into the Early Archaic.
This has tentatively been associated with a greater
emphasis on foraging. Diagnostic Early Archaic
artifacts include the Kirk Corner Notched point. As
previously discussed, Palmer points may be included
with either the Paleoindian or Archaic period,
depending on theoretical perspective. As the climate
became hotter and drier than the previous Paleoindian
period, resulting in vegetational changes, it also
affected settlement patterning as evidenced by a long-
term Kirk phase midden deposit at the Hardaway site
(Coe 1964:60). This is believed to have been the result
of a change in subsistence strategies.
Settlements during the Early Archaic suggest
the presence of a few, very large, and apparently
intensively occupied, sites which can best be considered
base camps. Hardaway might be one such site. In
addition, there were numerous small sites which
produced only a few artifacts - these are the "network
of tracks" mentioned by Ward (1983:65). The base
camps produce a wide range of artifact types and raw
materials which has suggested to many researchers long-
preceramic horizon" and that "the presence of ceramics
provides a convenient marker for separation of the Archaic
and Woodland periods (Oliver 1981:21). Others would
counter that such an approach ignores cultural continuity and
forces an artificial, and perhaps unrealistic, separation.
Sassaman and Anderson (1994:38-44), for example, include
Stallings and Thom's Creek wares in their discussion of "Late
Archaic Pottery." While this issue has been of considerable
importance along the Carolina and Georgia coasts, it has
never affected the Piedmont, which seems to have embraced
pottery far later, well into the conventional Woodland period.
term, perhaps seasonal or multi-seasonal, occupati
contrast, the smaller sites are thought of as
purpose or foraging sites (see Ward 1983:67).
Middle Archaic (8,000 to 6,000
diagnostic artifacts include Morrow Mou
Guilford, Stanly and Halifax projectile points. 1
(1983:25) also notes that the gradual increase
Paleoindian to Archaic in the Coastal Plain see
peak during the Middle Archaic Morrow Moi
phase. Much of our best information on the I
Archaic comes from sites investigated west c
Appalachian Mountains, such as the work b
Chapman and his students in the Little Tennessee
Valley (for a general overview see Chapman
1985a, 1985b). There is good evidence that I
Archaic lithic technologies changed dramatically
scrapers, at times associated with Paleoindian trail
are discontinued, raw materials tend to refle,
greater use of locally available materials, and mort
initially introduced. Associated with these techno
changes there seem to also be some significant cc
modifications. Prepared burials begin to
commonly occur and storage pits are identifies
work at Middle Archaic river valley sites, Witt
evidence of a diverse floral and faunal subsistence
seems to stand in stark contrast to Caldwell's I
Archaic "Old Quartz Industry" of Georgia ar
Carolinas, where axes, choppers, and group
polished stone tools are very rare.
The available information has resulte
variety of competing settlement models. Some ark
increased sedentism and a reduction of mobili{
Goodyear et al. 1979:111). Ward argues that th
appropriate model is one which includes relatively
and sedentary hunters and gatherers "primarily a
to the varied and rich resource base offered by the
alluvial valleys" (Ward 1983:69). While he recc
the presence of "inter-riveAne" sites, he dis
explanations which focus on seasonal rounds, sugl
"alternative explanations ... [including] a wide ra
adaptive responses." Most importantly, he notes
the seasonal transhumance model
and the sedentary model are opposite
ends of a continuum, and in all
likelihood variations on these two
12

C
•
PREHISTORIC AND HISTORIC SYNOPSIS
themes probably existed in different
regions at different times throughout
the Archaic period (Ward 1983:69).
Others suggest increased mobility during the
Archaic (see Cable 1982), Sassaman (1983) has
suggested that the Morrow Mountain phase people had
a great deal of residential mobility, based on the variety
of environmental zones they are found in and the lack
of site diversity. The high level of mobility, coupled with
the rapid replacement of these points, may help explain
the seemingly large numbers of sites with Middle
Archaic assemblages. Curiously, the later Guilford
phase sites are not as widely distributed, perhaps
suggesting that only certain micro-environments were
used (cf. Ward [1983:68-69] who would likely reject
the notion that substantially different environmental
zones are, in fact, represented).
Recently Abbott et al. (1995) argue for a
combination of these models, noting that the almost
certain increase in population levels probably resulted in
a contraction of local territories. With small territories
there would have been significantly greater pressure to
successfully exploit the limited resources by more
frequent movement of camps. They discount the idea
that these territories could have been exploited from a
single base camp without horticultural technology.
Abbott and his colleagues conclude, "increased
residential mobility under such conditions may in fact
represent a common stage in the development of
sedentism" (Abbott et al. 1995:9)•
North Carolina Piedmont, from the west, and were
contemporaneous with the groups producing Stanly
points (Coe 1964:122-123; Phelps 1983:23). Phelps,
building on Coe, refers to the Morrow Mountain and
Guilford as the "Western Intrusive horizon." Sassaman
(1995) has recently proposed a scenario for the Morrow
Mountain groups which would support this west-to-east
time-transgressive process. Abbott and his colleagues,
perhaps unaware of Sassaman's data, dismiss the
concept, commenting that the shear distribution and
number of these points "makes this position wholly
untenable" (Abbott et al. 1995:9).
The Late Archaic, usually dated from 6,000 to
3,000 or 4,000 B.P., is characterized by the
appearance of large, square stemmed Savannah River
projectile points (Coe 1964). These people continued to
intensively exploit the uplands much life earlier Archaic
groups within North Carolina, the bulb of our data for
this period comes from the Uwharrie region,
One of the more debated issues of the Late
Archaic is the typology of the Savannah River Stemmed
and its various diminutive forms. Oliver, refining Coe's
(1964) original Savannah River Stemmed type and a
small variant from Gaston (South 1959:153-157),
developed a complete sequence of stemmed points that
decrease uniformly in size through time (Oliver 1981,
1985). Specifically, he sees the progression from
Savannah River Stemmed to Small Savannah River
Stemmed to Gypsy Stemmed to Swannanoa from about
5,000 B.P. to about 1,500 B.P. He also notes that the
latter two forms are associated with Woodland pottery.
From excavations at a Sandhills site in
Chesterfield County, South Carolina, Gunn and his
colleague (Gunn and Wilson 1993) offer an alternative
model for Middle Archaic settlement. He accepts that
the uplands were desiccated from global warming, but
rather than limiting occupation, this environmental
change made the area more attractive for residential
base camps. Gunn and Wilson suggest that the open, or
fringe, habitat of the upland margins would have been
attractive to a wide variety of plant and animal species.
Another point of some controversy is the idea
that the groups responsible for the Middle Archaic
Morrow Mountain and Guilford points were intrusive
("without any background" in Coe's words) into the
This reconstruction is still debated with a
number of archaeologists expressing concern with what
they see as typological overlap and ambiguity. They
point to a dearth of radiocarbon dates and good
excavation contexts yet, at the same time they express
concern with the application of this typology outside the
North Carolina Piedmont (see, for a synopsis,
Sassaman and Anderson 1990:158-162, 1994:35).
In addition to the presence of Savannah River
points, the Late Archaic also witnessed the introduction
of steatite vessels (see Coe 1964:112-113; Sassaman
1993), polished and pecked stone artifacts, and grinding
stones. Some also include the introduction of fiber-
13
CULTURAL RESOURCES SURVEY OF A 50 ACRE TRACT IN HENDERSON
tempered pottery about 4000 B.P. in the Late Archaic
(for a discussion see Sassaman and Anderson 1994:38-
44). This innovation is of special importance along the
Georgia and South Carolina coasts, but seems to have
had only minimal impact in North Carolina.
There is evidence that during the Late Archaic
the climate began to approximate modern climatic
conditions. Rainfall increased resulting in a more lush
vegetation pattern. The pollen record indicates an
increase in pine which reduced the oak-hickory nut
masts which previously were so widespread. This change
probably affected settlement patterning since nut masts
were now more isolated and concentrated. From
research in the Savannah River valley near Aileen,
South Carolina, Sassaman has found considerable
diversity in Late Archaic site types with sites occurring
in virtually every upland environmental zone. He
suggests that this more complex settlement pattern
evolved from an increasingly complex socio-economic
system. While it is unlikely that this model can be
simply transferred to the Piedmont of North Carolina
without an extensive review of site data and micro-
environmental data, it does demonstrate one approach
to understanding the transition from Archaic to
Woodland.
Woodland Period
As previously discussed, there are those who
see the Woodland beginning with the introduction of
pottery suggestive of influences from northern cultures.
In the Piedmont, the Early Woodland is marked by a
pottery type defined by Coe (1964:27-29) as Badin.3
This pottery is identified as having very fine sand in the
paste with an occasional pebble." Coe identified cord-
marked, fabric-marked, net-impressed, and plain surface
finishes. Beyond this pottery little more is known
the makers of the Badin wares than is known
those who made New River wares.
The dominant Middle Woodland cerami,
is typically identified as the Yadkin series. Charact,
by a crushed quartz temper, the pottery includes st
treatments of cord-marked, fabric-marked, and
few linear check-stamped sherds (Coe 1964:3C
Although seemingly very different from Badin, Cc
recently commented that there was "a long peri
gradual change" (Coe 1995:154), suggesting tb
should be expecting a number of intermi
Badin/Yadkin sherds in the Piedmont. It is re fire
that several of the seemingly "best" Yadkin sites, st
the Trestle site (31An19) explored by Peter C
(Ward 1983:72-73), have never been published.
In some respects the Late Woodland (]
B.P. to 400 B.P.) may be characterized
continuation of previous Middle Woodland cu
assemblages. While outside the Carolinas there
major cultural changes, such as the cont
development and elaboration of agriculture,
Carolina groups settled into a lifeway not appre
different from that observed for the previous 50(
years. From the vantage point of the Middle Save
Valley Sassaman and his colleagues note that, "th,
Woodland is difficult to delineate typologically frc
antecedent or from the subsequent Mississippian p
(Sassaman et al. 1990:14). This situation
remain unchanged until the development of the
Appalachian Mississippian complex (see Fer,
1971).
The Late Woodland is typically associate
small triangular points such as Uwharrie, Caraway
Dee, and Clarksville (Coe n.d., 1964;49; Oliver
South 1959:144-146). The characteristic pottery
Uwharrie series which contains crushed quartz
characteristic of which is its tendency to prc
through the wall of the pottery). This series inc
cord-marked and net-impressed surface treatment
in the Uwharrie the stamping was fregi
overscraped. Lips were frequently notched or pi
and the rim was often decorated with incised
marks. Coe also comments that a cons
characteristic was the use of soft, thick cords foi
3 The ceramics suggest clear regional differences
during the Woodland which seem to only be magnified during
the later phases. Ward (1983:71), for example, notes that
there "marked distinctions" between the pottery from the
Buggs Island and Gaston Reservoirs and that from the south-
central Piedmont.
Coe, in fact, notes that the Badin paste is very
similar to that which characterizes Thom's Creek (Coe
1995:154).
14
J

•
PREHISTORIC AND HISTORIC SYNOPSIS
the cordage and nets which were used to stamp the
pottery (Coe 1995:157). The ware was described by Coe
in the unpublished Poole site report (Coe n.d.).5 This
pottery appears to represent an evolution from the
earlier Yadkin wares (Coe 1995:156) and, like with the
transition from Badin to Yadkin, Coe suggests that the
evolution of the Uwharrie was also gradual - again
suggesting that we should be seeing a variety of
intermediate "types."
people bearing the Pee Dee culture moved into the
Carolina Piedmont from the south, displacing the
native Uwharrie culture, and after a relatively brief
period of time retreated to the south in the face of the
advancing Siouans. Pee Dee has received many dates
since first discussed and, through time, has gradually
been pushed earlier - first to about A.D. 1450 and
most recently, by Oliver (1992) to occupy the span
from about A.D. 1100 to 1500.
Of equal interest is a radiocarbon date of A.D.
1610, suggesting that this pottery lasted well into the
protohistoric. Coe also notes that "Town Creek and
other villages situated along the fall line between the
Piedmont and the Coastal Plain seem to have formed a
southern boundary for the production and use of
Uwharrie ware," which he suggests was made by the
ancestors of the Sara, Tutelo, Occaneechi, Saponi, and
Keyauwee (Coe 1995:158).
Mississippian
The Mississippian in the North Carolina is
intimately tied to the Pee Dee. In spite of this Ward
only briefly mentions the culture in his synthesis of the
North Carolina Piedmont (Ward 1983:63) and until
recently one had to piece together ideas and concepts
largely from Reid's (1967) typology of the pottery
(which does provide a little background) or Ferguson's
(1971) examination of what he called the South
Appalachian Mississippian, which included central and
northern Georgia, the Middle Chattahoochee River
Valley, and the Atlantic Coastal Plain. More recently
Coe (1995) has filled in at least some of the blanks in
Pee Dee research, although much still remains to be
explored.
Coe's earliest discussion of Pee Dee focused on
Town Creek and he commented that the occupation was
"one of the best archaeological records of the movement
of a people in the southeast" (Coe 1952:309). The
'This study was intended to be published under a
monograph series entitled, University of North Carolina
Laboratory of American Archaeology Publications, but was never
completed. The work was conducted in 1936, although the
ensuing report is undated.
The most complete information concerning
the extensive work at Town Creek comes from Coe
(1995) and his co-authors that review lithics, faunal
remains, plant materials, human remains, and of course
the Pee Dee pottery. Still to be resolved, however, is the
relationship of Pee Dee to the range of other
complicated stamped materials found in the Carolinas.
Protohistoric and Historic Native American
Whatever simplicity the Carolina Piedmont
exhibits during the Woodland or even Mississippian, is
shattered in the Prato-Historic and early Historic. Coe
observes that:
Sara and Tutelo pottery evolved into
a new style named Dan River; what
was thought to be early Occaneechi
is presently termed Hillsboro; the
Saponi style was named Linwood;
and the Keyauwee pottery of this
period is called Caraway (Coe
1995:159).
Coe explains that what was previously called Linwood is
today classified as Caraway. In spite of this, he
distinguishes the two, commenting that the Saponi
wares have a different rim treatment and the paddles
were carved with steel knives rather than stone tools
(Coe 1995:161).
In spite of Coe's desire to "wrap up" everything
in the Piedmont in this neat package, the more detailed
research of his students suggests the situation is far
from clear. For those willing to carefully explore
Wilson's 600+ pages on the Carolina and Virginia
Siouan groups, there is the tantalizing suggestion that
the Hillsboro wares may not even represent a Siouan
15
CULTURAL RESOURCES SURVEY OF A 50 ACRE TRACT IN HENDERSON
group. More over he explains, by way of a summary:
Because of the numerous
shortcomings in the ceramic record
for the Carolina and Virginia
Piedmont, and the lack of precise
dates for most of the assemblages, a
true synthesis cannot be attempted
(Wilson 1983:483).
He does, however, offer some generalizations which help
us complete a picture or "snapshot" of the Piedmont
during the Historic Period.
For example, Wilson observes that the
distribution of Pee Dee and supposedly Siouan forms
suggests that the two groups were interacting along the
upper Wateree/lower Catawba, as well as the upper Pee
Dee and lower Yadkin drainages, although why there is
a gap between the two regions is far less clear.
Nevertheless, the Pee Dee probably introduced such
traits as burnishing and complicated stamping, cazuella
bowl forms, and rim applique strips. He goes on to
observe that, "it now seems probable that there was a
development during the early part of the Late
Prehistoric period of ceramics along the Catawba and
Yadkin Rivers that came later to be called by the generic
name `Catawba"' (Wilson 1983:484). In contrast, the
more northern Dan River assemblages suggest little
contact with the Pee Dee.
During the Protohistoric Period there is far
less known. The Hillsboro wares, which Coe identifies
with the Occaneechi, seem to have a strong resemblance
to the ceramics along the Roanoke River at the Fall
Line to the northeast. Caraway's abundant complicated
stamped pottery suggests a connection with the lower
Yadkin, but little else can be observed concerning this
far too poorly documented assemblage. Wilson remarks
that the "enigmatic" Linwood series is even more poorly
understood. Going back to much earlier efforts to
identify the ancestral home of Linwood in Virginia, he
notes that the issue has never been resolved. Even more
importantly, he comments, "identification of the
Linwood Series with the Saponi of 1701 should not be
taken as a given, especially with the revisions that have
been necessary for the other ceramic-ethnic group
relationships proposed by earlier researchers" (Wilson
1983:487).
Moving into the Historic Period, N
points out that the only information available f
lower Catawba is the fleeting mention of
mentioned by Coe as being associated with the Ca
Indians of 1700. Yet nothing has ever been pub
on this assemblage and the only available informal
that provided by Wilson from the analysis of .
small collection. Not unexpectedly, it is domina
smoothing, burnishing, complicated stamping
corncob impressing. He suggests that comp]
stamping and perhaps some other Lama
characteristics continued at least into the
seventeenth century. The shift from this to w
recognized today as "Catawba," cannot be explain
The only other information for the Piec
is that from the upper Dan River drainage.
excavation at two sites has produced the late seven,
century version of the Dan River ware, which N
calls the Oldtown Series (Wilson 1983:615-6U
found that rim folds, present in the earlier Ol
wares (and frequently associated with the Occane
drop out in the later Oldtown pottery. He admi{
disappearance of rim folds may relate tc
Occaneechi's loss of power and control over trade
at the hands of Nathaniel Bacon in 1676. But he
an equally plausible explanation. It may be th
folded rim originated far to the south, wit.
Catawba, and that as their focus turned from the
to the south with the establishment of a E
settlement in Charleston in 1670, their influer.
the northern Piedmont waned.
Although the ceramic sequence for tha
drainage is pretty well understood, he comment
similar patterns cannot be found in other are
simply because too little research has been
Moreover, much of what is available is poorly rep
In summary, Wilson offers a synthesis of Piec
Siouan ceramics:
Prior to the Late
Prehistoric period, the ceramics of a
region probably manifests
characteristics derived from the
cultures located within discrete river
16
0
•
•
PREHISTORIC AND HISTORIC SYNOPSIS
drainages. Interactions would be
linear, and the general pattern of
change and exchange of ceramic
attributes, traits, and modes would
follow a general Coastal Plain-
Piedmont-Mountain direction. This
linear orientation would be tied to
communication and information flow
up and down river systems, and not
between drainages.
With the expansion of the
Pee Dee culture up the Wateree and
Pee Dee Rivers, the same general
pattern of interaction is followed
during the Late Prehistoric period for
the lower Catawba and lower Yadkin
drainages. Information and
interaction is most intense up and
down the rivers. But, as
illustrated by the
presence of Pee Dee
sherds in Pisgah
assemblages of western
North Carolina
(Dickens 1976:198)
and on the Dan River,
these influences are also
felt across the drainages.
In the Piedmont this is
manifest by the
beginnings of a north-
south, and a decline of
the east-west,
south, an orientation which was tied
tot be Great Trading Path, the
Occaneechi Trail, that cut across
river drainages as it ran from the
Falls of the Appomattox River in
Virginia, to the Fall Line at
Augusta, Georgia. This change is
clearly evident in the increase of
"southern" traits in the ceramics
along the Dan River (Wilson
1983:491-492).
In spite of decades of research, the implications of this
scenario is far from clear.
Historic Overview
Northeastern North Carolina became "safe"
for expansion of colonial settlement with the
orientation in the
ceramics. Contact with
the Spaniards in the
1540s and 1560s
probably provided an
impetus to the changing
interaction pattern.
Certainly, with the
establishment of English
colonies in Virginia and
South Carolina, the
focus for Piedmont
Indian interaction
shifted decidedly north-
17
CULTURAL RESOURCES SURVEY OF A 50 ACRE TRACT IN
r1tcnwv,nF'
? r
15%:lt•1'il
'ot?lo(i ?i tt?s
I
ord
14 Rend rsu
al
? _"• altl?sl'r 1
H
PROJECT AR
• fit, :?
ookville R
Jai ers
151 tot
ran / d
.??•. `' iitr?•r v'Mt .h
uth?i •?h ? j ?f, t ^''
'' g ?Ite•?mttxli
t{Kf'llt1? 1SF! -'"---rParrPttt/',

- c ;11"1 'lll?t
? 1 1fr?a ?
.rh \? d ir.
110 P
Jol?. s .
Asvillr
(•,) '. 1 Airrtr
Figure 8. Portion of the 1865 U.S. Coast Survey map of North Carolina
the project area.
elimination of the Tuscarora in 1713. It was also
about this time that the Proprietary government, always
suffering under inefficient governors and neglect,
collapsed. In 1729 the Crown purchased the interests of
all but one of the proprietors. Lord Carteret, the sole
holdout, maintained his share, known as the Granville
District, embracing the upper third of North Carolina.
Significantly, this area included about two-thirds of the
people in the Colony at the site - and the study tract.
As might be imagined, this district caused considerable
confusion up until the American Revolution, when it
was seized by the people living in the area.
Collets 1770 A Compleat Map 4 Nortb-
Carolina (Figure 7) reveals that the study tract is
situated in the vicinity of a major trading path serving
to connect the area with Virginia to the north and
various points to the west.
ON
In the piedmont,
County (no longer in existe
was formed from Granvill
1764 and was then fui
subdivided to form Franklin
Warren counties in 1779. V
County was not created I
Granville, Warren, and Frar
counties until 1881 (Cc
1950).
Bute sent delegate
the Continental Congress in
Bern in 1774 and when
Revolution broke out in ,
1775 the Royal government l
down and a provis:
government was establishei]
1776 the Fourth Provis:
Congress met at Hal
authorizing North Car,
representatives to the Contin,
Congress to declare independ
Revolutionary
battles in the project areas
limited. There were no r
activities in Vance Coi
although Lord Cornwallis
travel through nearby Edgecc
County on his way north in 1781. Holm (1995
reports that Cornwallis camped near the present R
Mount-Wilson airport and engaged local milit.
several creek crossings.
In the area of piedmont Vance Count;
early settlers were primarily from Virginia and tol
became the main cash crop by the late eightE
century. With tobacco came slaves and as early as l
the trend toward large slave populations in the tol
counties along the Virginia border was already very
(Lefler and Newsom 1954:129). In fact, W;
County, which included part of Vance, was the
county in North Carolina with a larger slave popul
than free population.
During the antebellum Vance participat
the meteoric rise of bright leaf tobacco, v
18
0 PREHISTORIC AND HISTORIC SYNOPSIS
encouraged the construction of the Raleigh and Gaston
Railroad and later the Townsville Railroad. To the
southeast agriculture also encouraged the development
of the Wilmington and Raleigh Railroad, completed by
1840 and encouraging additional development. Much
of this transportation improvement is clearly visible on
the 1865 U.S. Coast Survey of North Carolina (Figure
8).
The study area was largely shielded from direct
conflict during the Civil War. After the Civil War the
local communities returned to agriculture, at various
times casting their fortunes with either cotton or
tobacco. By the end of the nineteenth century, however,
the region was heavily invested in tobacco. Vance, being
a relatively new county, and smaller than its neighbors,
was producing only 2,000,000 pounds of tobacco
annually, as well as about 3,000 bales of cotton (State
Board of Agriculture 1896:335, 371, 403).
Nevertheless, the new county had a very large black
population - 63.4% - reflecting its early reliance on
slavery.
The ascendancy of tobacco held through much
of the early twentieth century. In 1939, for example,
Rocky Mount, in nearby Nash County, was listed as the
third largest tobacco market in the state, behind Wilson
and Greenville.
•
19

METHODS
•
•
Archaeolo>:ical Field Methods
The initially proposed field techniques involved
the placement of shovel tests at 100 foot intervals along
transects laid out at 100 foot intervals. All soil would be
screened through '/a inch mesh, with each test
numbered sequentially by transect. Each test would
measure about 1 foot square and would normally be
taken to a depth of at least 1.5 to 2 feet or until subsoil
was encountered. All cultural remains would be
collected, except for mortar and brick, which would be
quantitatively noted in the field and discarded. Notes
would be maintained for profiles at any sites
encountered.
Should sites (defined by the presence of two or
more artifacts from either surface survey or shovel tests
within a 25 feet area) be identified, further tests would
be used to obtain data on site boundaries, artifact
quantity and diversity, site integrity, and temporal
affiliation. These tests would be placed at 25 to 50 feet
intervals in a simple cruciform pattern until two
consecutive negative shovel tests were encountered. The
information required for completion of North Carolina
archaeological site forms would be collected and
photographs would be taken, if warranted in the opinion
of the field investigators.
These proposed techniques were implemented
with no significant modifications. As previously
reported, we found much of the tract fallow. Although
this did not provide adequate surface visibility for
surface survey, it did mare access for shovel testing
relatively easy.
A series of 18 transects were laid out running
south from SR 1148. A total of 254 shovel tests were
excavated in the project area. Most of these tests in the
cultivated area revealed a plowzone of brown (10YR5/3)
sandy loam ranging from 0.5 to 1.0 foot in depth. This
generally overlaid a yellowish brown (10YR5/8) clay
loam subsoil. In areas of erosion the subsoil was more
often a strong brown (7.5YR5/6) clay.
The GPS positions were taken with a Garmin
GPS 12XL rover and a Garmin GBR 21 Beacon
Receiver. The Garmin 12XL tracks up to twelve
satellites, each with a separate channel that is
continuously being read. The benefit of parallel channel
receivers is their improved sensitivity and ability to
obtain and hold a satellite loch in difficult situations,
such as in forests or urban environments where signal
obstruction is a frequent problem. This was a vital
consideration for the study area.
GPS accuracy is generally affected by a
number of sources of potential error, including errors
with satellite clocks, multipathing, and selective
availability. Satellite clock errors can occur when the
satellite's clock is off by as little as a millisecond, or
when a slightly-askew orbit results in a distance error.
Multipathing occurs when the signal bounces off trees,
chainlink fences, or bodies of water. Multipathing was
probably not a significant source of error for this study
since the corridor was cleared and our readings were
taken in the center of each site. The source of most
extreme GPS errors is selective availability (SA), the
deliberate mistiming of satellite signals by the
Department of Defense. This degradation results in
horizontal errors of up to 100 m 95% of the time,
although the error may be as much as 300 in.
Nevertheless, selective availability has been turned off by
the DOD. We have previously determined that 3D' and
DGPS readings with the Garmin 12XL were identical.
Therefore, we relied on 3D navigation mode, with
expected potential horizontal errors of 6 in or less.
1 A basic requirement for GPS position accuracy is
having a lock on at least four satellites, which places the
receiver in 3D mode. This is critical - as an example,
positions calculated with less than four satellites can have
horizontal errors in excess of a mile, or over 1,600 m.
21
CULTURAL RESOURCES SURVEY OF A 50 ACRE TRACT IN HENDERSON
Architectural Survey
As previously discussed, we elected to use a 0.5
mile area of potential effect (APE). The architectural
survey recorded buildings, sites, structures, and objects
which appeared to have been constructed before 1950.
Typical of such projects, this survey recorded only those
which have maintained their integrity. Those which
have undergone such extensive modifications to preclude
their eligibility were not recorded.
culture is present in districts, sites,
buildings, structures, and objects
that possess integrity of location,
design, setting, materials,
workmanship, feeling, and
association, and
a. that are associated with events
that have made a significant
contribution to the broad patterns
of our history; or
For each identified resource an architectural
survey form would be completed and at least two
representative photographs would be taken. Permanent
control numbers would be assigned by the Architectural
Branch at the conclusion of the study. The site forms
for the resources identified during this study would then
be submitted to the North Carolina State Historic
Preservation Office.
The survey was conducted by driving the public
roads (typically county or state secondary roads) in the
APE. These roads included NC 39, SR 1148,
SR1591, and SR1577, as well as several county roads
without numbers.
As previously discussed, Vance County has no
comprehensive architectural survey, and there were no
sites previously recorded in this APE.
Site Evaluation
Archaeological sites will be evaluated for
further work based on the eligibility criteria for the
National Register of Historic Places. Chicora
Foundation only provides an opinion of National
Register eligibility and the final determination is made
by the lead federal agency, in consultation with the
State Historic Preservation Officer at the North
Carolina Division of Archives and History.
The criteria for eligibility to the National
Register of Historic Places is described by 36CFR60.4,
which states:
the quality of significance in
American history, architecture,
archaeology, engineering, and
b. that are associated with the lives
of persons significant in our past;
or
c. that embody the distinctive
characteristics of a type, period, or
method of construction or that
represent the work of a master, or
that possess high artistic values, or
that represent a significant and
distinguishable entity whose
components may lack individual
distinction; or
d. that have yielded, or may be
likely to yield, information
important in prehistory or history.
National Register Bugetin 36 (Townsend
1993) provides an evaluative process that contair
steps for forming a clearly defined explicit rationa
either the site's eligibility or lack of eligibility. B
these steps are:
¦ identification of the site's data sets
or categories of archaeological
information such as ceramics, lithics,
subsistence remains, architectural
remains, or sub-surface features;
¦ identification of the historic
context applicable to the site,
providing a framework for the
evaluative process;
¦ identification of the important
22
0
•
•
METHODS
research questions the site might be
able to address, given the data sets
and the context;
¦ evaluation of the site's
archaeological integrity to ensure
that the data sets were sufficiently
well preserved to address the research
questions; and
¦ identification of important research
questions among all of those which
might be asked and answered at the
site.
This approach, of course, has been developed
for use documenting eligibility of sites being actually
nominated to the National Register of Historic Places
where the evaluative process must stand alone, with
relatively little reference to other documentation and
where typically only one site is being considered. As a
result, some aspects of the evaluative process have been
summarized, but we have tried to focus on each
archaeological site's ability to address significant
research topics within the context of its available data
sets.
For architectural sites the evaluative process would
be somewhat different. Given the relatively limited
architectural data available for most of the properties,
we anticipated on evaluating these sites using National
Register Criterion C, focusing on the site's "distinctive
characteristics." Key to this concept is the issue of
integrity. This means that the property needs to have
retained, essentially intact, its physical identity from the
historic period.
Particular attention would be given to the
integrity of design, workmanship, and materials. Design
includes the organization of space, proportion, scale,
technology, ornamentation, and materials. As National
Register Bulletin 36 observes, "Recognizability of a
property, or the ability of a property to convey its
significance, depends largely upon the degree to which
the design of the property is intact" (Townsend et al.
1993:18). Workmanship is evidence of the artisan's
labor and skill and can apply to either the entire
property or to specific features of the property. Finally,
materials - the physical items used on and in the
property - are "of paramount importance under
Criterion C" (Townsend et al. 1993:19). Integrity here
is reflected by maintenance of the original material and
avoidance of replacement materials.
Laboratory Analysis
The cleaning and analysis of artifacts was
conducted in Columbia, South Carolina at the Chicora
Foundation laboratories. These materials have been
catalogued and accessioned for curation at the Office
of State Archaeology, the closest regional repository.
Site 31VN261'" is curated as accession number
210004, while 31VN262" is ciurated as accession
number 210005. The site forms for the identified
archaeological sites have been filed with the Office of
State Archaeology. Field notes and photographic
materials have been prepared for curation using archival
standards and will be transferred to that agency as soon
as the project is complete.
Analysis methods focused on occupation spans,
likely functions of the various sites, and changes in raw
material or ceramic preferences.
Analysis of the historic collections follow
professionally accepted standards with a level of
suitability to the quantity and quality of the remains.
In general, the temporal, cultural, and typological
classifications of historic remains follow such authors as
Price (1970) and South (1977). Glass artifacts are
identified using sources such as Jones (1986), and Jones
and Sullivan (1985). Sutton and Arleush (1996)
provide an excellent overview of a broad range of other
historic material, although primary sources will typically
be provided in the text if the remains require a more
detailed analysis.
23
•
RESULTS
0
•
Introduction
The intensive shovel testing at the 50 acre
addition to the Wesvanco tract identified two historic
archaeological sites, 31VN261 and 31VN262 (Figure
9). Both are diffuse scatters of historic remains and
neither is recommended eligible for inclusion on the
National Register of Historic Places. The architectural
survey identified one structure in the 0.5 mile APE
which was clearly over 50 years in age. Unfortunately,
this structure no longer possesses sufficient integrity to
be considered for the National Register. No additional
management activities are recommended for this
structure.
Identified. Archaeological Sites
31VN261"
This site is a scatter of historic remains
identified about 150 feet south of SR 1148 (Old
Epsom Road; today known as Vanco Mill Road) and
southeast of an existing dirt farm road. The site was
initially identified on the basis of a large surface scatter
found in an area which has been subjected to recent
ground disturbance, but was subsequently also identified
in shovel testing. Moreover, there are some above
ground remains which we believe are associated with the
historic scatter. The central UTM coordinates are
N4019611 E734857 and the site is found on a broad
interior ridge overlooking a small drainage off the study
tract to the northeast. Elevations in the site area are
about 490 feet AMSL.
The core of the site was open, characterized by
light grass or broom straw. Along the west and east
edges of the site there were dense pine and mixed
hardwoods. At the north edge of the site, close to SR
1148 there is a very large oak tree that dominates the
site area. Based on both shovel testing and surface
scatters, the site measures about 250 feet northeast-
southwest by 100 feet northwest-southeast (Figures 10
and 11).
Transect 4 was placed immediately north of
the dirt farm road, which runs off SR 1148 to the
southwest. Shovel Test 3 (designated N100E100) on
this transect was positive, producing one undecorated
whiteware and one clear container glass fragment. The
profile revealed an Ap horizon of brown (10YR5/3) sand
to a depth of about 1 foot, overlying a yellowish brown
(10YR5/8) sandy clay subsoil. The profiles are
consistent with Appling soils. All of the materials were
recovered from the plowzone. The site was further tested
on a cruciform pattern with eight tests at 50 foot
intervals. Test N150EI00 was also positive, producing
two fragments of window glass. The other shovel tests
were all negative.
To the north of N200E 100, toward SR 1148,
there was a surface scatter of historic remains, situated
in the disturbed area. The materials were all modern,
suggestive of either a dump or possibly a demolished
structure. A grab collection produced 8 fragments of
undecorated whiteware, three fragments of white
porcelain, five clear container glass fragments, two
manganese bottle fragments, one green bottle glass
fragment, two porcelain tile fragments, one metal
doorknob, three animal bones fragments, and one piece
of coal (discarded in the field).
The site area also contains a relatively modern
barn at the south edge and a well at the northeastern
edge. The barn (Figure 12) is of frame construction
using modern lumber and is covered with v-crimp tin
siding. The gable ends are weatherboard and the roof is
also v-crimp tin. The well consists of a concrete pad and
CMU enclosure - suggesting a modern, probably
drilled, well.
The archaeological remains present at the site
are typical of those expected from an early to mid-
twentieth century site. Manganese glass, for example,
was most popular from the last quarter of the
25
CULTURAL RESOURCES SURVEY OF A 50 ACRE TRACT IN HENDERSON
?•}u?
JII o°
?.,h
go*
Ila
tl o
11
Li
N ?r
I!

0

S
31VN261**
,o
IN%

'p 500 1000,
SCALE IN FEET
9. Plan of the study tract
. T1
HISTORIC RESOURCE 1

?tJ \
transects and identified sites.
26
0
•
METHODS
6
e
e°
o?
??'?• vwio
. ' Ow • J
O
I ?
w
w S
,: ? w
z '
m
••
e°
Q° w
OQ
0
J
U
•
8
z
f/I N ^6' o

>
'
0 G
= O
y N N Z LL
W W W Z) 8 Z
Q I_ a m J
75
¢
w 0 FW
W O w
Z d y y
U
y
y
O • ® ,

o
§ ? 8 Z
z z
?-Z
r-t
N
m
?.ya
°
U
N
?JJ
rl
N
w
w
27
CULTURAL RESOURCES SURVEY OF A 50 ACRE TRACT IN HENDERSON
little evidence
artifact group
are two
buildings, but
relatively moc
neither is l
contribute s:
information cc
the lifeways of
mid-twentieth
farmers.
In
these remain:
disturbed -
from farming
or possibly f
removal of a
from the site
context of the
is uncertain
integrity is que;
nineteenth century though the first quarter of the
twentieth century (Jones And Sullivan 1985:13). The
porcelain tile and doorknob, however, are more likely
from a mid-twentieth century structure. The existing
architectural remains are
also characteristic of a
farm complex from the
mid (or even late)
twentieth century.
The data sets at
this site are minimal.
There is no evidence of
the original house (it
may have been present
in the heavily disturbed
area near the road, but
there are no foundation
or brick pier remains).
There were no features
suggested by the surface
inspection or the shovel
testing. The
archaeological remains
are limited to primarily
kitchen remains, with
It seems unlikely that the arch;
remains (even with the remaining architec
capable of addressing significant research c
28
'igure 12. View of the barn at the south edge of 31VN261** looking to tl
northwest.
•
fragment of wire, one
green bottle glass
fragment, one
manganese glass
fragment, and one
mill= glass fragment (a
canning jar lid liner).
Additional
shovel tests were
METHODS
excavated at 50 foot
intervals from ST 4
on Transect 6, but
none were positive
(although there were
surface remains).
11
0 clearly modern material, one wire nail, one cut nail, one
Consequently, we recommend the site not eligible for
inclusion on the National Register. No additional
management activities are recommended, pending the
review and concurrence of the State Historic
Preservation Office.
31 VN262**
This site is situated about 300 feet to the
southeast of 31VA261** and represents a dense area of
trash refuse in the woods (Figures 13 and 14). The
central UTM coordinates are N4019580 E734930.
The site was first encountered as surface remains in an
area of dense pines and mixed hardwoods on Transect 6.
Shovel Tests 3 through 6 produced evidence of the
trash deposit, although the materials in ST s 3, 5, and
6 were plastics and styrofoam and were not retained.
For each the profile revealed about a foot of brown
(10YR5/3) loam mixed with trash that was especially
dense in the upper 0.5 foot. A yellowish brown
(IOYR5/8) sandy clay subsoil was encountered at about
1.0 foot and there was no evidence of trash in this
subsoil. The encountered soil profiles are consistent
with the Appling Series.
Shovel Test 4 yielded, in addition to other
Materials were not
identified in Transect
5 to the west, but were
present in the vicinity
of Shovel I est 4 on
Transect 7. Consequently, the site is estimated to cover
an area about 375 feet north-soutl, by 175 feet east-
west.
It appears that this site represents an area of
off-site trash disposal. We suspect that it was associated
with 31VN261**, although most of the remains appear
to be from the late twentieth century.
The data sets at the site are, to say the least,
varied. A wide range of plastic, modern metal, and
Styrofoam remains are present. Some are still partially
contained within decomposing plastic trash hags. There
are piles of broken bottles or condiment containers,
associated with "tin" cans. Most of the materials,
however, appear to be kitchen-related. Moreover, these
materials appear to be associated with one or more sites
and the deposit was used over a number of years, most
recently we believe into the f990s.
While it is possible for sites less than 50 years
old to be eligible for the National Register, if they are of
11 exceptional importance" or parts of districts which are
otherwise eligible for listing. Neither seems to be the
case at 31VN262**. Dumps of this sort are common in
the rural South. While they may provide information,
perhaps even important information, concerning
29
CULTURAL RESOURCES SURVEY OF A 50 ACRE TRACT IN HENDERSON

0 040 O NEGATIVE SHOVEL TEST
T 6 Q?ASO?L! • POSITIVE SHOVEL TEST
ROq? • ' ' % LIMITS OF SURFACE SCATT

?
i ' rr?eJ
i T7°
C
b
Q

Q

ST 40 ,
1 O • O .'

b

b

b
p •

%,r y
0 50 100 21
i
SCALE IN FEET
? FALLOW
FIELDS
re 14. Sketch map of 31VN262".
30
0
•
LI architectural sites in the
METHODS
consumer choice, rural dietary patterns, and evidence of
gradual changes in rural lifeways, we do not believe the
data sets are of "exceptional importance." Moreover, it
seems likely that the questions might be as easily studied
using other avenues, such as census studies and
consumer polls.
Consequently, we do not
believe that this site is
eligible for inclusion on
the National Register.
No additional
management activities
are recommended,
pending the review and
compliance of the State
Historic Preservation
Office.
0.5 mile APE. Our
survey did identify one
structure (Historic
Resource 1) which
appeared to have been
constructed over 50
years ago. Situated
south of the project tract
and immediately south
of the intersection of SR
1148 and SR1591 the
structure is a hall-and-
parlor style. One story
and of frame
anew - construction with
painted weatherboards,
the structure has a
lateral gable roof now in
asphalt shingles on the
front elevation and v-
crimp metal elsewhere.
There is a porch
covering less than the full facade with a shed roof
supported by a wooden support on a brick pedestal. The
porch itself is a concrete slab raised above grade.
Overall, it appears that the porch has been extensively
reworked. The building is situated on a continuous
Historic and
Architectural
Resources
As previously
discussed, there were no
previously recorded
31
CULTURAL RESOURCES SURVEY OF A 50 ACRE TRACT IN HENDERSON
CMU foundation. Double windows on the front
elevation are 3/1; elsewhere they have been boarded up,
suggesting loss of window details. There are at least two
rear additions which have incorporated what appears to
be an original stone chimney.
The structure is on the edge of the study tract,
in close proximity to the proposed undertaking. It is
likely that it will be affected by the project, both through
short-term increases in noise, vibration, and dust, as
well as through long-term changes in the surroundings.
The house is in the process of being
"renovated" although it has already lost much integrity
through the rear additions, the introduction of a storm
door, the loss of window details, and the reworking of
the porch. Based on these modifications, we do not
believe that the structure possesses sufficient integrity to
warrant recordation; nor is the structure eligible for
inclusion on the National Register. Consequently, we do
not believe that either the short or long-term changes to
the property are significant.
32
0
SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATIONS
to
0 and those present offer limited data sets. We
This study involved the examination of an 50
acre tract situated to the east of the previously surveyed
Wesvanco Tract in south central Vance County, North
Carolina. The tract, along with the 200 acres to the
west, is proposed for use as a distribution center for a
confidential client. This work, conducted for Carter
Burgess, is intended to examine the archaeological sites
found on the proposed tract, as well as historic sites
which are within a 0.5-mile area of potential effects
(APE). This report is intended to assist Carter Burgess
and its clients comply with their historic preservation
responsibilities.
The proposed work will result in extensive
clearing, grubbing, grading, as well as construction
activities. It is likely to destroy any archaeological sites
which may be present on the survey tract. The work may
also modify the visual surroundings of any historic
properties in the APE, although the area has been
heavily impacted by existing industrial developments.
While surrounding areas had been under
cultivation in the past, much of the area is today either
industrial or a mixture of commercial and residential.
The survey tract itself is fallow, probably not having
been cultivated since at least 1999. There are several
areas of dense woods, primarily on the southern and
southeast edges of the tract. The fallow fields which
comprise the bullz of the tract allow easy access, but the
surface visibility was sufficiently limited that shovel
testing was necessary. The shovel tests, conducted at
100 foot intervals on transects spaced 100 feet apart,
revealed some erosion in the steeper areas, but otherwise
a fairly consistent plowzone overlying a clay subsoil.
As a result of this investigation, two sites were
identified within the study tract. Site 31VN261"
represents the probable remains of a mid-twentieth
century farm unit. Remaining structures include a
modern well and barn. The house site itself appears
heavily disturbed. Shovel testing revealed few artifacts
recommend the site not eligible for inclusion on the
National Register and recommend no additional
management activities, pending the review and
concurrence of the State Historic Preservation Office.
The other site, 31VN262*' represents a
scatter of domestic trash, primarily from the late
twentieth century. While a few materials potentially
older than 50 years were identified, the vast majority of
the remains clearly date from the last quarter of the
twentieth century. This site appears to represent a rural
trash dump, perhaps associated with 31 VN261 ". While
there are a variety of data sets, this site is less than 50
years in age and we do not believe that it represents
materials of "exceptional importance." Consequently,
the site is recommended not eligible for inclusion on the
National Register. Like 31VN261", no additional
management activities are recommended, pending the
review and concurrence of the State Historic
Preservation Office.
In addition to the archaeological
investigations, a survey of historic sites was also
conducted within the 0.5-mile APE. There has been no
survey for Vance County and this study failed to
identify any structures within the APE which were over
50 years in age and which retained their integrity. The
one historic resource identified had been extensively
modified and can no longer be considered an important
architectural resource. It is recommended not eligible
for inclusion on the National Register.
It is possible that archaeological remains may
be encountered in the corridor during construction
activities. As always, the utility's contractors should be
advised to report any discoveries of concentrations of
artifacts (such as bottles, ceramics, or projectile points)
or brick rubble to the project engineer, who should in
turn report the material to the State Historic
Preservation Office, or Chicora Foundation (the
process of dealing with late discoveries is discussed in
36CFR800.13(b)(3)). No further land altering
33
CULTURAL RESOURCES SURVEY OF A 50 ACRE TRACT IN HENDERSON
activities should take place in the vicinity of these
discoveries until they have been examined by an
archaeologist and, if necessary, have been processed
according to 36CFR800.13(b)(3).
34
r
SOURCES CITED
Abbott, Lawrence E., Jr., John S. Cable, Mary Beth Eastern North America by County
Reed, and Erica E. Sanborn and Distribution: An AENA Project.
1995 An Archaeological Survey and Testing Archaeology of Eastern North America
of the Mclean-Thompson Property 10:27-46.
Land Acquisition, and the Ambulatory
Health Care Clinic Project, Fort Cable, John S.
Bragg, Cumberland County, North 1982 Differences in Lithic Assemblages of
Carolina. Technical Report 349. New Forager and Collector Strategies. In
South Associates, Stone Mountain, Archaeological Survey and
Georgia. Reconnaissance Within the Ten-Year
Floodpool Harry S. Truman Dam and
Anderson, David G. Reservoir, edited by Richard Taylor.
1990 A North American Paleoindian Report Submitted to the U.S. Army
Projectile Point Database. Current Corps of Engineers, Kansas City
Research in the Pleistocene 7:67-69. District
1992a A History of Paleoindian and Early Campo, Rachel and Michael Trinkley
•
Archaic Research in the South 1999 Archaeological Survey of Three Tracts
Carolina Area. In Paleoindian and in Edgecombe, Nash, and Vance
Early Archaic Period Research in the Counties, North Carolina. Research
Lower Southeast: A South Carolina Contribution 276. Chicora
Perspective, edited by David G. Foundation, Inc., Columbia.
Anderson, Kenneth E. Sassaman,
and Christopher judge, pp. 7-18. Canouts, Veletta, and Albert C. Goodyear
Council of South Carolina 1985 Lithic Scatters in the South
Professional Archaeologists, Carolina Piedmont. In Structure and
Columbia. Process in Southeastern Archaeology,
edited by R. S. Dickens, Jr. and H.T.
1992b models of Paleoindian and Early Ward, pp. 180-194. University of
Archaic Settlement in the Lower Alabama Press, University.
Southeast. In Paleoindian and Early
Archaic Period Research in the Lower Chapman, Jefferson
Southeast: A South Carolina 1977 Archaic Period Research in the Lower
Perspective, edited by David G. Little Tennessee River Valley, 1975:
Anderson, Kenneth E. Sassaman, Icehouse Bottom, Harrison Branch,
and Christopher judge, pp. 28-47. Thirty Acre Island Callaway Island.
Council of South Carolina Report of Investigations 18.
Professional Archaeologists, University of Tennessee, Knoxville.
Columbia.
1985a Archaeology and the Archaic Period
Brennan, Louis A. in the SouthernpRidge-and-Valley
• 1982 A Compilation of Fluted Points of Province. In Structure and Process in
35
CULTURAL RESOURCES SURVEY OF A 50 ACRE TRACT IN HENDERSON
Southeastern Archaeology, edited by
Roy S. Dickens and H. Trawick
Ward, pp. 137-179. The University
of Alabama Press, University.
and Christopher judge, pp.
77.Council of South Ca
professional Archaeolo
Columbia.
1985b Tellico Archaeology: 12,000 Years of Dickens, Roy S., Jr.
Native American History. Reports of 1976 Cherohee Prehistory: The 1
Investigations 43, Occasional Paper Phase in the Appalachian St
5. University of Tennessee, Region. University of Tem
Knoxville. Press, Knoxville.
Coe, Joffre L.
n.d. The Poole Site: Randolph County.
Ms. on file, Research Laboratories of
Anthropology, University of North
Carolina, Chapel Hill.
Ferguson, Leland G.
1971 South Appalachian Mississip
Unpublished Ph.D. dissert
University of North Carolii
Chapel Hill. University Micro
Ann Arbor.
1952 The Cultural Sequence of the
Carolina Piedmont. In Archaeology of
the Eastern United States, edited by
James B. Griffin, pp. 301-311.
University of Chicago Press,
Chicago.
1964 the Formative Cultures of the Carolina
Piedmont. Transaction of the
American Philosophical Society
54(5).
Coe, Joffre L., editor
1995 Town Creels Indian Mound: A Native
American Legacy. University of
North Carolina Press, Chapel Hill.
Corbitt, David L.
1950 The Formation of the North Carolina
Counties, 1663-1943. State
Department of Archives and History,
Raleigh.
Daniel, I. Randolph, Jr.
1992 Early Archaic Settlement in the
Southeast: A North Carolina
Perspective. In Paleoindian and Early
Archaic Period Research in the Lower
Southeast: A South Carolina
Perspective, edited by David G.
Anderson, Kenneth E. Sassaman,
Gade, Ole, H. Daniel Stillwell, and Art Rex
1986 North Carolina: People
Environments. GEO-APP, B
North Carolina.
Goodyear, Albert C., John H. House, and Ne
Ackerly
1979 Laurens-Anderson: An Archaeo
Study of the Infer-Riverine Pied
Anthropological Studies
Occasional Papers of the Instit
Archaeology and Anthrop
University of South Car
Columbia.
Gunn, Joel D. and Kathy Wilson.
1993 Archaeological Data Re
Investigations at Sites 38CT5,
38CT58 Along the S. C. Jet
Bypass, Chesterfield County,
Carolina. Garrow and Assoc
Raleigh. Submitted to the
Department of Highways and I
Transportation, Columbia.
Holm, Mary Ann, Shane C. Paterson, and L
Lautzenheiser
1999 Archaeological Survey Prc
Belmont Farms Subdivision,
County, North Carolina. C
36
0
•
•
SOURCES CITED
Carolina Research, Tarboro, North
Carolina.
Jones, Olive R.
1986 Cylindrical English [dine and Beer
Bottles, 1735-1850. National
Historic Parks and Sites Branch,
Quebec.
Jones, Olive R. and Catherine Sullivan
1985 The Parks Canada Glass Glossary for
the Description of Containers,
Tableware, Flat Glass, and Closures.
National Historic Parks and Sites
Branch, Parks Canada, Quebec.
Lautzenheiser, Loretta, Mary Ann Holm, Jane
McManus Eastman, and Jody Carter
1996 Archaeological Survey, Kerr Lake
Wilderness Camp, Vance County,
North Carolina. Coastal Carolina
Research, Tarboro, North Carolina.
Elements of the Carolina Projectile
Point Sequence. In Structure and
Process in Southeastern Archaeology,
edited by Roy S. Dickens and H.
Trawick Ward, pp. 195-211. The
University of Alabama Press,
University.
1992 Settlements of the Pee Dee Culture.
Unpublished Ph.D. Dissertation,
University of North Carolina at
Chapel Hill. University Microfilms,
Ann Arbor.
Peck, Rodney M.
1988 Clovis Points of Early Man in North
Carolina. American Anthropologist
12:425-433.
Perkinson, Phil
1971 North Carolina Fluted Points:
Survey Report Number One.
Southern Indian Studies 23:3-40.
Lee, W.D.
1934 North Carolina Erosion Survey.
U.S.D.A., Soil Conservation
Service, Washington, D.C.
Lefler, Hugh Talmage and Albert Ray Newsom
1954 North Carolina: The History of a
Southern State. University of North
Carolina Press, Chapel Hill.
Michie, James L.
1977 Early Man in South Carolina.
Honor's Thesis, Department of
Anthropology, University of South
Carolina.
Oliver, Billy L.
1981 The Piedmont Tradition: Refinement of
the Savannah River Stemmed Point
Type. Unpublished Master's thesis,
Department of Anthropology,
University of North Carolina,
Chapel Hill.
1985 'T'radition and Typology: Basic
1973 North Carolina Fluted Points:
Survey Report Number Two.
Southern Indian Studies 25:3-60.
Phelps, David S.
1983 Archaeology of the North Carolina
Coast and Coastal Plain: Problems
and Hypotheses. In The Prehistory of
North Carolina: An Archaeological
Symposium, edited by Mark A.
Mathis and Jeffrey J. Crow, pp. 1-52.
North Carolina Division of Archives
and History, Department of Cultural
Resources, Raleigh.
Price, Cynthia
1979 19th Century `Ceramics in the Eastern
Ozark Boarder Region. Monograph
Series 1. Center for Archaeological
Research, Southwest Missouri
University, Springfield.
Reid, James Jefferson, Jr.
1967 Pee Dee Pottery from the Mound at
Town Creek. Unpublished M.A.
37
CULTURAL RESOURCES SURVEY OF A 50 ACRE TRACT IN HENDERSON
thesis. Department of Anthropology, Carolina: A Synthesis for Re
University of North Carolina at and Resource Management. C
Chapel Hill. of South Carolina Profe,
Archaeologists, Columbia.
Robertson, Stanley M.
1960 Soil Survey Forsyth County, North Sassaman, Kenneth E., Marla J. Brooks, G
Carolina. USDA, Soil Conservation Hanson, and David G. Anderson
Service, Washington, D.C. 1990 Native American Prehistory
Middle Savannah River
Sassaman, Kenneth E. Savannah River Archaeo
1983 Middle and Late Archaic Settlement in Research Publication 1.
the South Carolina Piedmont. Carolina Institute of Archa
Unpublished Master's thesis. and Anthropology, Univers
Department of Anthropology, South Carolina, Columbia.
University of South Carolina,
Columbia. Service, Elman R.
1966 The Hunters. Prentic(
1993 Early Pottery in the Southeast: Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey.
Tradition and Innovation in Cooking
Technology. University of Alabama South, Stanley
Press, University. 1959 A Study of the Prehistory
Roanoke Rapids Basin. M
1995 The Cultural Diversity of thesis, Department of Sociolo
Interactions Among Mid-Holocene Anthropology, University of
Societies of the American Carolina, Chapel Hill.
Southeast. In Native American
Interactions: Multiscalar Analyses and 1977 Method and Theory in Hi;
Interpretations in the Eastern Archaeology. Academic Pres:
woodlands, edited by M. S. York.
Nassanmey and K. E. Sassaman.
University of Tennessee Press, State Board of Agriculture
Knoxville. 1896 North Carolina and Its Resourc
I. & J. C. Stewart Public Pi
Sassaman Kenneth E. and David G. Anderson Winston-Salem.
1990 Typology and Chronology. In Native
American Prehistory of the Middle Stimpson, Jerry V., Roy L. Mathis, Jr., Will
Savannah River Valley, edited by Shope, Joel W. Cawthorn, and David Clapp
Kenneth E. Sassaman, Mark J. 1980 Soil Survey of Vance County,
Brooks, Glen T. Hanson, and David Carolina. U.S.D.A.,
G. Anderson, pp. 143-216. Conservation Service, Washi
Savannah River Archaeological D.C.
Research Publication 1. South
Carolina Institute of Archaeology Sutton, Mark Q. and Brooke S. Arkush
and Anthropology, University of 1996 Archaeological Laboratory M,
South Carolina, Columbia. An Introduction. Kendal
Publishing Company, Du
1994 Middle and Late Archaic Iowa.
Archaeological Records of south
38
•
•
•
SOURCES CITED
Tippitt, V. Ann, and William H. Marquardt
1982 A Preliminary Report of the First
Excavation Season at the Gregg
Shoals Site (9EB259), Elbert
County, Georgia. South Carolina
Antiquities 14:1-24.
Townsend, Jan, John H. Sprinkle, Jr., and John Knoerl
1993 Guidelines for Evaluating and
Registering Historical Archaeological
Sites and Districts. Bulletin 36.
National Parr Service, National
Register of Historic Places,
Washington, D.C.
the 20th Southeastern
Archaeological Conference.
Southeastern Archaeological Conference
Bulletin 2.
Wilson, Jack H., Jr.
1983 A Study of the Late Prehistoric,
Protohistoric, and Historic Indians of
the Carolina and Virginia Piedmont.
Ph.D. Dissertation, University of
North Carolina at Chapel Hill.
University Microfilms, Ann Arbor.
Trimble, Stanley W.
1974 Man-Induced Soil Erosion on the
Southern Piedmont, 1700-1970. Soil
Conservation Society of America,
Ankey, Iowa.
Ward, H. Trawick
1983 A Review of Archaeology in the
North Carolina Piedmont: A Study
of Change. In The Prehistory of North
Carolina: An Archaeological
Symposium, edited by Marla A.
Mathis and Jeffrey J. Crow, pp. 53-
82. North Carolina Division of
Archives and History, Raleigh.
Ward, H. Trawicle and R.P. Stephen Davis
1999 Time Before History: The Archaeology
of North Carolina. The University of
North Carolina Press, Chapel Hill.
Walthall, John A.
1980 Prehistoric Indians of the Southeast:
Archaeology of Alabama. University of
Alabama Press, Tuscaloosa.
White, Max E.
1979 Archaeological Survey: John H. Kerr
Dam and Reservoir. Soil Systems,
Inc., Marietta, Georgia.
Williams, Stephen B. (editor)
1965 The Paleoindian Era: Proceedings of
39
ENGINEERING CONSULTING SERVICES, LTD.
sui) Geotechnical Construction Materials Environmental
February 15, 2001
Mr. Timothy Campbell
Carter :: Burgess, Inc.
Brookfield Corporate Center
120 Brookfield Parkway
Suite 102
Greenville, South Carolina 29607
RE: Endangered Species Evaluation
Robert Lloyd 50-Acre Tract
Henderson, North Carolina
ECS Project Number 14-1528
Dear Mr. Campbell:
Engineering Consulting Services, Ltd. (ECS) has completed the endangered species evaluation of
the above-mentioned property. The subject property consists of a 50-acre tax parcel located on
Vanco Mill Road (SRI 148) Vance County, Henderson, North Carolina.
0 Site Description
The subject site consists of an undeveloped 50-acre parcel in southeast Henderson, North
Carolina. The location of the subject site can be viewed in Figure 1, a United States Geological
Survey Map of Henderson, North Carolina. The subject site is bordered to the north by Vanco
Mill Road (SR 1148), with approximately 1,850 feet of road frontage, and to the south by a
drainage ditch that is approximately 1,200 linear feet. A moderate surface gradient from the
southern and western portion of the site flows to the drainage ditch. The slight to moderate
surface gradient from the northern and eastern portion of the site flows to an area of lower
elevation that is located on the north eastern portion of the subject site. The surface topography
of the subject site can be viewed in Figure 2.
Endangered or Threatened Species Known to Vance County
According to the United States Fish & Wildlife Service (USFWS), the governing agency of
endangered and threatened species in the United States, one endangered and one threatened
species are currently listed in Vance County, North Carolina.
Threatened Species-Among vertebrates, the Bald Eagle (Haliaeetus leucocephalus) is the only
threatened species in Vance County. According to the USFWS, due to the symbolic federal
svmbol of this vertebrate, the Bald Eagle is listed as threatened throughout the United States.
Adult Bald Eagles average approximately 3 feet from head to tail and weigh approximately 14
pounds when fully mature. An adult wingspan can reach up to 7 feet. Juveniles are dark brown
until 5 or 6 years of age when the white head begins to develop. Traditionally, females are
slightly larger than males.
1040 Thousand Oaks Boulevard, Suite D, Greenville, SC 29607 e [phone] e Fax [phone]
, MD - Atlanta, GA - Baltimore, MD - Chantilly, VA - Charlotte, NC - Chicago, IL - Danville, VA' - Frederick, MD - Fredericksburg, VA - Greensboro, NC
nville, SC - Norfolk, VA - Raleigh, NC - Richmond, VA - Roanoke, VA - Williamsburg, VA - Wilmington,NC' - Winchester, VA' 'Testing Services Only
Mr. Timothy Campbell
Robert Lloyd 50-Acre Tract
ECS Project No. 14-1528
de No. 2 of 3
eding pairs unite for life or until death of a mate. Breeding season varies throughout the U.S,
but typically begins in the winter for southern populations. The typical nest is very large,
measuring up to 6 feet and weighing several hundred pounds. The same nest may be used by the
same pair of eagles for several years.
The habitat of the subject site is not considered adequate for housing this species. Tall tree
canopies or rock face cliffs are most suitable for nesting. Neither of these elements are present on
the subject site. According to the USFWS and National Heritage Foundation (NHF), Bald Eagles
have not been observed in Vance County. (Courtesy of United States Fish & Wildlife Service,
and National Heritage Foundation, 2001)
Endangered Species- Among invertebrates, the Dwarf Wedge Mussel (Alasmidonta heterodon)
in the only endangered species in Vance County. The Dwarf Wedge Mussel was listed as
"endangered" on March 14, 1990.
The dwarf-wedge mussel is relatively small, rarely exceeding 1.5 inches in length. The shell's
outer surface (periostracum) is usually brown or yellowish brown in color, with faint green rays
that are most noticeable in young specimens. Unlike some mussel species, the male and female
shells differ slightly, with the female being wider to allow greater space for egg development. A
distinguishing characteristic of this mussel is the dentition pattern; the right valve possesses two
lateral teeth, while the left valve has only one. This trait is opposite of all other North American
species having lateral teeth (Clark 1981).
s mussel is considered to be a long-term brooder, with gravid females reportedly observed in
is months. Like other freshwater mussels, this species' eggs are fertilized in the female as sperm
are taken in through their siphons as they respire. The eggs develop with the female's gills into a
larvae (glochidia). The females later release the glochidia, which then attach to the gills or fins of
specific host fish species. Based on anecdotal evidence, such as dates when gravid females are
present or absent, it appears that release of glochidia occurs primarily in April in North Carolina
(Michaelson and Neves 1995). Recent research has confirmed at least three potential fish host
species for the dwarf-wedge mussel to be the tessellated darter, Johnny darter, and mottled
sculpin ( Michaelson 1995).
The dwarf-wedge mussel occurs in at least 25 stream reaches along the Atlantic Coast from New
Brunswick, Canada, to North Carolina. Documented populations in North Carolina are located in
the following drainages and streams: Neuse River Drainage - Little River (Wake and Johnston
County); Swift Creek (Wake and Johnston County); Middle and Buffalo Creek (Johnston
County); Turkey Creek (Nash and Wilson County); Stony Creek (Nash); and Moccasin Creek
(Nash, Wilson, and Johnston Counties); Tar River Drainage - Tar River and Shelton Creek
(Granville County); Ruin, Little Ruin, and Tabbs Creek (Vance County); Cedar, Crooked, Fox,
Shocco, and Little Shocco Creeks (Franklin County); and Shocco Creek (Warren County).
(Courtesy of the United States Fish & Wildlife Service and the National Heritage Foundation,
2001)
The Dwarf Wedge Mussel inhabits creek and river areas with a slow to moderate current and a
sand, gravel, or muddy bottom. While approximately 2,000 linear feet of nearby Martin Creek
and tributaries were searched, no evidence of Dwarf Wedge Mussels were detected. Host fish for
oding are the tessellated darter, the Johnny darter and the mottled sculpin. All of these fish are
tnd primarily in third and fourth order streams. Martin Creek is considered by the North
Mr. Timothy Campbell
Robert Lloyd 50-Acre Tract
ECS Project No. 14-1528
Page No. 3 of 3
Oarolina Division of Water Quality (NCDWQ) as a second order stream. Thereby supporting
conclusions that this invertebrate does not inhabit any waters located on the subject site.
Conclusions
Detailed surveys and inspections of the subject site and immediate surrounding areas indicate that
neither the federally threatened Bald Eagle nor the endangered Dwarf Wedge Mussel are known
to reside on the Robert Lloyd Property in Vance County, Henderson, North Carolina.
Furthermore, the review of current, and historical data has revealed that the habitat does not exist
on the subject property for Bald Eagle or Dwarf Wedge Mussel. Therefore, ECS has concluded
that an appropriate level of reconnaissance and inquiry has been made to determine that these
species do not inhabit the subject site.
Thank you for allowing us to assist you with your environmental needs. If you have any
questions or required additional information please do not hesitate to contact Brian Ball at 864-
987-1610.
Sincerely,
Engineering Consulting Services, Ltd.
0. /A'000'0
iftrian A. Ball, P.G.
epartment Manager
Environmental Services
Theodore J. Pappas
Senior Biologist
Attachments (2)
0
Hamet
01.
t'• 1
i • y•
• VVV
_ - n 1 + w. .sic . t Mw It 1 1
-4 en 4' ? 49.1 ?1 .'???r-?.. (`. .?G..??wr•?, tom. ?•aci..J'n?--?- I' ? ••I`? 1? `p? -I?
ti aJ?c?
Pop
! ? . ? • ,c ' ;? .•` / Ili I , ?: . I t .
?_?. .III {\ Y W?konw •? `?aY. Y .._j, r,, •? ? ?
__ • -.??' •°?'Yi? i1?W. I ??.I I ?.M ... •• 1. % x•11
1V
1 - - ?'
...
39
-,t a
_+q5?
.i . f_ Bear fond .f?
•• s
I INCH =± 2,000 FEET USGS TOPOGRAPHIC MAP + N
Source USGS 7.5-Minute Topographic Map, 'Henderson, N.C.", dated 1970, photorevised 1982.
dangered Species Evaluation
bert Lloyd & Assoc. + 50 Acre Parcel
r0rolina State Route 1148
n n, North Carolina
ENGINEERING CONSULTING SERVICES. LTD
Ca rter:: Bu rgess
ECS Project No. 14-1528
February 2001
Figure 1
iJill • '? t•
1 vl ? t
?r+' I I I 1 1 ` ? ? ? ? ?`
1 ; 1 I I 'M1
.. I f ? 1 t jM1
A\11
?r j ji ?? ' ?,? .
r 4i t f SP ,
lit ....................... !E ,:
t / I
alstu:,r;ttttrtttstts: t? i?' ? ? ? ? _ ?:
\
rj4 .: ? :::.......::..y.... ,; ??
tl7t'atLLLt/tI LLfLt ItLLtL ?t ?E .. •.. "
1'f Ot:ASitL307atLtt=tR.'t'tL { i
NOT TO SCALE SITE PLAN + N
Source: Carter::Burgess
Endangered Species Evaluation Carter::Burgess
R ' ^ t Lloyd & Assoc. + 50 Acre Parcel ECS Project No. 14-1528
Carolina State Route 1148 February 2001
H erson, North Carolina Figure 2
ENGINEERING CONSULTING SERVICES. LTD
i
I
i
?'I
ENGINEERING CONSULTING SERVICES, LTD.
Geotechnical Construction Materials o Environmental
February 14, 2001
Mr. Timothy Campbell
Carter & Burgess, Inc.
Brookfield Corporate Center
120 Brookfield Parkway
Suite 102
Greenville, South Carolina 29607
RE: Endangered Species Evaluation
Robert Lloyd 50-Acre Tract
Henderson, North Carolina
ECS Project Number 14:1528
Dear Mr. Campbell:
Engineering Consulting Services, Ltd. (ECS) has completed the endangered species evaluation of
the above-mentioned property. The subject property consists of a 50-acre tax parcel that located
Vanco Mill Road (SRI 148) Vance County, Henderson, North Carolina.
6 Site Description
The subject site consists of an undeveloped 50-acre parcel in southeast Henderson, North
Carolina. The location of the subject site can be viewed in Figure 1, a United States Geological
Survey Map of Henderson, North Carolina. The subject site is bordered to the north Vanco Mill
Road (SR 1148), with approximately 1,850 feet of road frontage, and to the south by a drainage
ditch that is approximately 1,200 linear feet. A moderate surface gradient from the southern and
western portion of the site flows to the drainage ditch. The slight to moderate surface gradient
from the northern and eastern portion of the site flows to an area of lower elevation that is located
on the north eastern portion of the subject site. The surface topography of the subject site can be
viewed in Figure 2.
Endangered or Threatened Species Known to Vance County
According to the United States Fish & Wildlife Service (USFWS), the governing agency of
endangered and threatened species in the United States, one endangered and one threatened
species are currently listed in Vance County, North Carolina.
Threatened Species-Among vertebrates, the Bald Eagle (Haliaeetus leucocephalus) is the only
threatened species in Vance County. According to the USFWS, due to the symbolic federal
symbol of this vertebrate, the Bald Eagle is listed as threatened throughout the United States.
Adult Bald Eagles average approximately 3 feet from head to tail and weigh approximately 14
0 i unds when fully mature. An adult wingspan can reach up to 7 feet. Juveniles are dark brown
it 5 or 6 years of age when the white head begins to develop. Traditionally, females are
ghtly larger than males.
12015, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina 27709 [phone] Fax[phone] www.ecslimited.com
MD* • Atlanta, GA • Austin, TX - Baltimore, MD Chantilly, VA • Charlotte, NC. Chicago, IL • Danville, VA* • Frederick, MD Fredericksburg, VA
sboro, NC Greenville, SC • Norfolk, VA • Raleigh, NC Richmond, VA • Roanoke, VA • Williamsburg, VA • Wilmington, NC* Winchester, VA*
*Testing Services Only
Mr. Timothy Campbell
February 14, 2001
Robert Lloyd 50-Acre Tract (ECS #14:1528)
•
Breeding pairs unite for life or until death of a mate. Breeding season varies throughout the U.S,
but typicall begins in the winter for southern populations. The typical nest is very large,
measuring up to 6 feet and weighing several hundred pounds. The same nest may be used by the
same pair of eagles for several years.
The habitat of the subject site is not considered adequate for housing this species. Tall tree
canopies or rock face cliffs are most suitable for nesting. Neither of these elements are present on
the subject site. According to the USFWS and National Heritage Foundation (NHF), Bald Eagles
have not been observed in Vance County. (Courtesy of United States Fish & Wildlife Service,
and National Heritage Foundation, 2001)
Endangered Species- Among invertebrates, the Dwarf Wedge Mussel (Alasmidonta heterodon)
in the only endangered species in Vance County. The Dwarf Wedge Mussel was listed as
"endangered" on March 14, 1990.
The dwarf-wedge mussel is relatively small, rarely exceeding 1.5 inches in length. The shell's
outer surface (periostracum) is usually brown or yellowish brown in color, with faint green rays
that are most noticeable in young specimens. Unlike some mussel species, the male and female
shells differ slightly, with the female being wider to allow greater space for egg development. A
distinguishing characteristic of this mussel is the dentition pattern; the right valve possesses two
lateral teeth, while the left valve has only one. This trait is opposite of all other North American
species having lateral teeth (Clark 1981).
*is mussel is considered to be a long-term brooder, with gravid females reportedly observed in
fall months. Like other freshwater mussels, this species' eggs are fertilized in the female as sperm
are taken in through their siphons as they respire. The eggs develop with the female's gills into a
larvae (glochidia). The females later release the glochidia, which then attach to the gills or fins of
specific host fish species. Based on anecdotal evidence, such as dates when gravid females are
present or absent, it appears that release of glochidia occurs primarily in April in North Carolina
(Michaelson and Neves 1995). Recent research has confirmed at least three potential fish host
species for the dwarf-wedge mussel to be the tessellated darter, Johnny darter, and mottled
sculpin ( Michaelson 1995).
The dwarf-wedge mussel occurs in at least 25 stream reaches along the Atlantic Coast from New
Brunswick, Canada, to North Carolina. Documented populations in North Carolina are located in
the following drainages and streams: Neuse River Drainage - Little River (Wake and Johnston
County); Swift Creek (Wake and Johnston County); Middle and Buffalo Creek (Johnston
County); Turkey Creek (Nash and Wilson County); Stony Creek (Nash); and Moccasin Creek
(Nash, Wilson, and Johnston Counties); Tar River Drainage - Tar River and Shelton Creek
(Granville County); Ruin, Little Ruin, and Tabbs Creek (Vance County); Cedar, Crooked, Fox,
Shocco, and Little Shocco Creeks (Franklin County); and Shocco Creek (Warren County).
(Courtesy of the United States Fish & Wildlife Service and the National Heritage Foundation,
2001)
The Dwarf Wedge Mussel inhabits creek and river areas with a slow to moderate current and a
sand, gravel, or muddy bottom. While approximately 2,000 linear feet of nearby Martin Creek
r?d tributaries were searched, no evidence of Dwarf Wedge Mussels were detected. Host fish for
ooding are the tessellated darter, the Johnny darter and the mottled sculpin. All of these fish are
found primarily in third and fourth order streams. Martin Creek is considered by the North
Mr. Timothy Campbell
February 14, 2001
ert Lloyd 50-Acre Tract (ECS #14:1528)
16b
Carolina Division of Water Quality (NCDWQ) as a second order stream. Thereby supporting
conclusions that this invertebrate does not inhabit any waters located on the subject site.
Thank you for allowing us to assist you with your environmental needs. If you have any
questions or required additional information please do not hesitate to contact me at 919.544.1735.
Sincerely,
Engineering Consulting Services, Ltd.
Theodore J. Pappas
Sr. Biologist

-J
0
}er 11 I U
kN ;l -
r:
ji]I e o i h -.welcome • r / " ii II' •5J8)
C : h•pel . /?? vim` • G J l/r
Sy e
- ?• \\? - '\ `` / ?`f ( u l \ ` l
(
101
47 A
?lr 11 \. \ • • 11 J I p • Y
% . ?? 1.
`? ` \? O ^ • 11 p Iu?
i u u J If 1146 O ive•in
C ,ee k'
y" f S
n \ ) / 7I7
0 11 o BM 51 c ?. ?\ ?b?laUOn \?? ii ?•
'Al
51 l? al;m
• ,I ?`? - ear • o • d O , ?) ; l o
J II ?? I 4y f><+
• a .•\Q / ` I• IN (/?? 1511 4
-4414
O s
?- ' 'sell , Q ... ?.• i - - ? ? _?. J ? ?_i ? Ilsel?
50
I INCH = ± 2,000 FEET USGS TOPOGRAPHIC MAP 'It' N
Some:
Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Carter::Burgess
Robert Lloyd & Assoc. ± 50 Acre Parcel ECS Project No. 14-1528
North Carolina State Route 1148 February 2001
I rson, North Carolina IBM= ate- Figure 1
aw+Npyw+migWh. rt,7ledi+uY "w%Mra?;;n,
a twxt/wnaNP+a• pie- ?i K..'w t....•
ENGINEERING CONSULTING SERVICES. LTD.
.. a Fi , _ ': Iii I?` l?il.? F(1I?1?6?:??1?r
?.' ', .• ?x ez a_ '? t,i ;I ????d?i•?ian-Iit;ii
fill
04
/ wl
' tef •,t • 1 - - - - 1, • it
t..
I t o rG. «i? .??? i4\?ra
•t • t + 1 I 1? 1 '
t f ?
1 ` j
I
?E J-fa V •`r4` J 1 ' ??`
-'--_-
'' aiii?s?)stxrecellzi?sraCS; t ;? it
i. 'a+y-a!iYtb47:arsilRiRAi-tE
N
NOT TO SCALE
SITE PLAN
Source: Carter::Burgess
+N
ase I Environmental Site Assessment
be loyd & Assoc. ± 50 Acre Parcel
r rolina State Route 1148
n on, North Carolina
ENGINEERING CONSULTING SERVICES, LTD.
Carter::Burgess
ECS Project No. 14-1528
February 2001
Figure 2
t
NOT TO SCALE 1993 AERIAL PHOTOGRAPH
Source'. Terraserver
i Phase I En,ironmental Site Assessment
Rob t Llovd & Assoc. ± 50 Acre Parcel
N arolina State Route 1148
Herl rson. North Carolina
+N
Carter::Burgess
ECS Project No. 14-1528
February 2001
Figure 5

NOT TO SCALE 1981 AERIAL PHOTOGRAPH
Source: USDA, Farm Service Agency, Vance County Extension
;ase I Environmental Site Assessment
tbert Lloyd & Assoc. + 50 Acre Parcel
'rth Carolina State Route 1148
nd?. North Carolina
+N
Carter::Burgess
ECS Project No. 14-1528
February 2001
Figure 6
MATCH LINE RED C2.12 r. r _ , ._.,r._._._._.-._._._.
I , s - ~ _ l i I i I I - ~ - ----._._.T laD' ' _ i i_ i i i 1 I 1 ---._i I 0 - ; 1 ~.r`-'
CORNER o " ie oz ' N 20269.10 ti:." t't•'rr
n 1 ( I I I I 95' ' 8 i 7 DC TO ' ' ~"s i TMG 0 II ~ i i i i i ~racE III i i I I I I 1 I E JIITO:40 AO
ND - ' I ~ ' ~ „ I ~ _ I i i I i I I i i I i i i i I 1 N 3i ~ ~ 11 N Z I I I N Ei I ~ ~ ~ ~ i ! i 1 r J i
Ii '~-i------'- ~ ~ °i i ' 1 1 1 , 0 1 I 1 ! 1 1
N. I I I I I I I I I~~ s m+l l ~ /Y~ I 1 4 1 FtltIP, LL 1 1 I I 1 n 1 ) I I I I 1 I i I I I e, o, I I Q ~ r I , F ' it CORNER 4 1 N 20169.21 E 11175.84
I r, I DRIB G00f5S i i i i I I ~ ' I _ c 5 1 3 1 I I I I i I 55' 110 55' ~ 8 TO ~ ~ t 1
I ~ IIS' 0 1 r ~ ' -1- L--'---L-._._.~._ ---I----'--I-'--AREA-44-----' . ~ F,ENCE , I I I ~ i
I I I I I I I f I I I I I ' II W 2B N 2611 .I ~ i 0 0 I - er rt----- E 1091 . B ~ I 1 t I I I I i i 1 I _ 1 ~
r 7 I I f Q _ I I I I I I i 1 I I 1 N _ I._._._.F._._. ~ I 1 ~ 1 1 1 1 1
.~.._I I I I !5 { ~ FLUN~ N ` , I ~ ~ ly4e aN I i I i 1 I 1 I ! I AE: 6/C .5 ' e CORNER 1 I N 20069.27
~ f~ =l:. ~ r ( I I 1 i 3 /.//';;i:- I I AREk1 I 1 I I N 20116. 2 ' E 11180.09 i ~ I
~ } . 3t ~ I I 1 I ( ; BUFFER Z91ff M E 1085.6 ~ ~ I . ~ I ~ ~ t - _ _ _ - - - -E'-'-- r~ ' I] I ~ I I ~ I ~ ~ A.~.•,,.I'-I-, - r ~ -'-'-I----'- -1- '1" END EP ~ 5 I I f`
1 ' - ~ 'y' ~ ~ i I I ( C ( f [ N 20ti01.42 Eln AOC If It N ¢
j s 0 Yr E 1OS73.1 l ` ~ rl I 1 1 ! I I 1 FENCE CORNEA r 1 ,v! ! t~ ~i I ~ N 19995.42 BEGIN EP r , - ~ N 1 17.42 N 20001.42 ( ` a+ 6 J W¢ N as 1 O N_
. I r'_, ' 1 I I iE 10757.421 f I I 073.11 Ito I E 10675.75 ~ E I _ - ~ r ' 80C t- CORNER 1 !OOOI.A2 N 19%9.27
I:. . ....-..s y.. .1,'.`..: ~a. 1~tti n ~ ro ---:_S=:.;;;.-"' .r E~IOB9~'.76 r s*u1w 0 I # f ~ ~ \ i, - - - - - - _ - - - ~ENC 'CORI4F,A I I I I E I "~E1~- I ~ IB N I 974z 089+5'. T6 E 11183.49 N E`CORKR
o ~ i i I I I - b E.t0903,16 999493.42 '0903 J6
I r ~O I ~ t'Y' I ~ I-I-- ~ E 20' GRAVEL DR1YE.'~~ R MI ~ I I I k I~~~ ~ I ~ _J._'.7 ' y-- 9 DOUBLE 12' CATE 6 ROLL CURB l R I t ~ ~ '~`15€ ~-,~~i = xJIQ9 .$Bi' BEGIN EP CENTEAEO ON DRIVE f ~ 1_------ f' C I a J ! - 20001_42--'°~ a'
n N _ -----'---'~:a: ~J~ / VO T?' N 19993.4 - i 1 i 1 3S5t 20'AN 19957.42 _~°2,..___ N t.' I 1 , I ~ I 18 a 10.39' p E 10593. U- - '"E"t0A14.85 Y DRIVE N . 1r N J
~E I + I 1 I ~ ~ N • ~ 20' CRA EE t i IB Imo- ENO EP.^~ FENCE CORNER N 49971: d2 o ~I ( i I Z, I ~ BEGU4'BOC N 19993.42 1 E 10814,85 - e CORNER
I t---~ p N,19933.42 E 10675,,75.---"-~y ' 1 I _._.-i- .t-• VQ f~'10573.tt + N 9846.72 o c m z E 1 11187.92 o m W m w c
i ~ - «!:r:u3~~~ - i br'.JI~~i~;~ a N 19948.58 ~ _ ^ -tl I 1 i ~ ~,n p G 19 ' E 10541•@3'" - a r9-A~4aoi;
~ =I I I I I ! t - G, p b b 18 b I I` - _ V' I I ~ I N 1989~•~8:'-^ eC R 306.74•~J _ o a 306.74'
F-i_~,_._-_._._. _._._.I_._._._1_. _.1._. t 1 ~l I E 10542„8411 i w rr i r N 1 Oh 82 ~ Q i I i ~ I n, ~~q'10 S OV54' 10 W
~ i ~ 4 5 STRIPE' " ~ ~ I ~ I I I I ~ ~ ~ ~ 1 V \E~ti16~45. g9 ; - ~.µ..{3gSi.4r~ ~ , u•,~tr -_11~F~1`/_]tERA~rI_.N.~°'~! _._5Y1..~ 19 24 E 10552. ~ ~ , i z o O
~ I- I Lt7R I i p a I ~ 4-7 R:7 19 O1 ~ G ' N 19a2,'4~ 5g ; I ~ I AREA-B`~. I / I E 10542.8{I ~ z o cn U > zZ
~ I I ( _ f i I m I I III i~ n n I ' o Q t CORNER
- -r,._._.L._._._ c e_. aR 4 I ( N I .88' m N 197b6~~iB; I ' I ~ E I ~ v I I I I f r 5~36? E 10942.841 ~ i i u vI ~ ~ ~l~, r r r i I l i ~1.1 N 19724.36 X Z E 11192.34 O
i ~ p L~ n i ' i i i ' I ~ ASSOCIATE R4RKING 16 1e ~ 1M-°-'39• b ~ ; ~ -t W Up
I I [ I I ~---._I 1 ~ t\ N I~f08i,F+8a' ~ I I 296.71'~~ - - - - i I~ t ~t1, \ ~ E 1054h84 ~ I 2•E 42'32'E W Q
u I. , N 82 42 3 IRE ~ IR i i - ,~J~" ~ ~ t \ ~ ~e 8:,5 , I 1 , 1 ~ ~ ~ I I I I 1 vi ~ ~ V~~ E'11 ~45•~`, - ~ 4 11 1r I , I x~ R i s ' ~«,~R i S R i i t--~ ~ 18 N , ~ 11 t 1 O < W
~ s L,~~ _ ~@7~Qirl._1_._._._ - ` t8 N 5.36 I I N 19686. TO `x _ L.._,_:-T?k-._.. eea-. ! t E ~4~.TI I 1 E 10898.02 3 °Z O Q CORNER g'N U T-
~ ~ mow.-:_-=--'-"~ - - I N 19624.37 p E 11195.95
° n I ) ~ ' , N 1~2~r51j I I ~l~ x>; : ~ C T E 3 E 19541A IJ ' ~h ~ ~ i { . :H1 ' VDIYI~f f1 ~ _ I w ~ ~ 1,_, I I 1
~jg ~ - 7 i G,: 10 - 32 a Ib18' ~ ; ~ s; , . ~ ~ ~ I I - - - - I II I ' I
I l ~ f i t I i I l i t i
p ! N 1590.58 I 6 S $ 1 { { j r j BC 9 N 19590.58 P~; I~ I f ~ ~ BB00~~ ' ~ ~ % ~ j 1 v 1 • • I 2i' E 10419.58 ~ W 1959bt`SA ' _ I ~ ,
~ ~ ~ it ` ~ I _ ~ ~ ~ ENO EOC f; 405R3~11 ~ ~ dd I ~ ~ I k ~I I - I 11"fD'S FLUNE 1VAPRON Y ~ ~ ~ ~ 1 , I ;I E I .05 ' , l' rr , F- Z ~ Q
AE• 5/C4.9 ~ ; I _ ------•----•-----i iii I n ~ I--------.- , I I I 1 O J } CL
Y ~ 4 I + 1 I I ( I il, N19549r0a-.____^^;' . 1 1 1 ¢ i i 1 - I I Q Z .I O
t a II i ~ !a I 1 t `4 `1ti l\ 1 1 1 i I • i > \ . e I U)
i' I t l i • I t\ ~,~r, 1 t 1 ` / 1 ~ Z W
Q
I a i~ ~ ~li ~ ~ _ _ W p Ir
9 ~ - - I Q ca
n S t _ °at1 i a A R j a .EL''
~ 1 _ - ~ 7 ~ ~ ^ ' 1 ' .n- . I 1 r 3 ~ $ g -....a».__ I I
^ , 3i d~ ~ I
S 1 5 S ' . ~ ,
I 1, t ) 5 ~ - - 1 ~ "1 3 Y Y ~ I___ ^
I ~ i 1 II. ^ \640155 ~ i , ^ ' ' ~ i s 4------------------ I 5 ,I ~ I
_ I ~ , I ~ E1
6 ~ 4 I ' 35° 00'00"
I ' t 1 I 1 I „a ~ ~i ~i - I 1 1 1 PLAN TRUE NORTH y NORTH
x 4t 8 L---------------- - - ~ _ _ W~ may
s~ s~ sd e I +S. Y.d. 1.^ 4.. I H
y r-O m ~€m i ° O1c
• NN ~ 1 I tDf r___________________ I co 2 1
~ i F 1 ` E .6:; ° man N
I'~ III ' ~ it ~ a I LINE TABLE ~ j 1 ' c ~ f
5t 8 ~ ~ 1 1~ 1 LINE LENGTH BEARING n n i I x 1 fd P,
g i ue 99.99' S05.3rx"E $ ~ ~ ~ ~ I L19 100.04' S 03'07'04^'E UV ~ t f
1 1.20 I~.O3' S 02' 25'55 E I , ~s; I'. f
I L21 100.06' SOt•S7'03'E 6 ~ ~ >t L22 122.63' S 02.04'rl'rt 0 50 100 150 200
3 ~ , ~ Y ~ °4 ( ~ , Y I q 1 GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET
_L, , i ~ a4 ~ Ili ii",I i i
!C R LLu ~ 'I'I Q CORNEA € ~ sm ~ ~ t I~J,I N 19016.84 'o., I „t E 9935.58 ~f
N 937.33' N 45.24'25'£ 59.67' 1 SHEET i
~i ~i ~ ~ ` I - - - - - ~ g g ' N 90°00'00'Y a CUiNER L
~8 $7 8 € a E 9893x09 KEY PLAN C2.14
_ ~ 1 AREA 4 -LAYOUT & DIMENSION PLAN Y~ 4.~/ " C2.14 SCALEI I'=50'
y a a~
~J°o °~n ~~o& Copyright © 2004 by Carter & Burgess,tnc.

# 6091
' m ~ 1 0 fl 1 to
3 01, c I g ~ oy ~ t APB' S 1519, SSIR 1638 O t JPa -cI N ttF
R a AP 9, ~ e O Z~ ° ~ y99 ~ e ePt q o° t
~ m ~ s~ m Y ( Y ~ Aq T o eq %
t SP9 GyD S <IC rsH i y Ls acs j
~P? AVA ~ c I DAVI F i 9 tt o w e
i E 2 = ~ 9~ < A43 f j FOX UN LE U = SSR 1653 10 9 4 SSR 1672
~ ~ ° OWEN~ KA D PF~ XP qE D m
/ ~o ~ SAM M. WALTON DEVELOPMENT COMPLEX , ~ NI° RY R ° R , 3 SSq ° T3 NO RV > SOUTH P a
2001 S.E, TENTH STREET, DEPT. 9562 S ~ SCR LIN -I S = 8 { ICTORV
w R 11A6 Dy. BENTONVILLE, ARKANSAS 72716-0550 a ~ R 1146
SNY 72 3 SSR t•g ,o mssP TAN 2 , .133 SSR 113 a 0 AN S n 0
I,. ~ 41A p F ° ~ 248 E ¢ 1 I4 R Z BSR 1 0 0
,5 ssR J T I O N 8Sq 1636 p
DISTRIBUTION ' Itants in Plannin En ineerin ,Architecture, Consu g, g 9 CENTER R SSR 1540 SSR 1609
Construction Management, and Related Services LOCATION ON 39
y LAT: 36° i 7' 28.7'N 28. 7'N 6. 5'W 39
CARTER & BURGESS INC. LONG: 76°23'6, 5'W Retail & Distribution -Floor 29
in Street Fort Worth Texas 76102 777 Ma J E AREAS
817 222-8500 Fax [phone] DISCIPLINE CODE BUILDING AREAS SIT ( )
C • CIVIL I. NAREHOUSE I• IOPOGAJPIIY I A • ARCNITECTLI20. 2. TRUCK NAINTEWNCE GARAGE ~ TAD ~
5 - STRIICTLNAL 3. OIARDHCUSE 1 d1AINAGE ~ HITECTS ENGINEERS P.C. RJRFPLMPNWSF C & B ARC / - A< M MECHANIC 5. EROSION CONTf10. P -RIBBING fi. PAYING
Retail & Distribution -Floor 29 E -ELECTRICAL 7. SITE IIPAOVEIENTS s A -AEFAIGERATIOM A. UTILITY &1 OrN 1
777 Main Street, Fort Worth, Texas 76102 fP - FIRE PROTECTIOx 9. LANDSCI?FNG M4 - YCHITECTIFAL (IET0. RIIIDINGI [phone] Fax (8 U) 222-8550 - E01f"~""'~'"` m1D1MG N5 - STAUCr1N2AL IIETJt BI11LDp61 VICIP
J -BAR JOIST METAL BUILOINGI CF -YCHIIECTUTAL KCpICAETEI VICINITY MAP NOT TO SCALE
It - ARCNIIECTLBAL (LON TEif.) NO1
T T N PACKAGE ? CONCRETE FLOOR PACKAGE ? METAL 6' PACKAGE ? ELECTRICAL PACKAGE ? FIRE PRO EC IO ? METAL BUILDING PACKAGE w0.01 ARCHITECTURAL ABBREVIATIONS. SYMBOLS t GENERAL NOTES
T PACKAGE ? BUILDING PACKAGE ? MECHANICAL S[ E i YIAl1C16 SYMBOLS 1 CENERAI NOTES N0.01 NECNYICM. AYREYIATIdS, $YM805 A WERAL MIFS E0.11 EILCRICN AMIEYIATIpIS SFNBOS i QMERAICaT~ ~ .02 SIIE RW MIRE PAOTECTId • 5YMA05 i GEAEAAL XOTES x0.02 ire~ICll pICpE1EYF1001 OETAIYM80.5, i ffXERAt NOTES MA0.01 YOIffCiWl A& CD.01 SIIE AB8IEVIATIdS, 5YIB0.5 6 GENERAL N01C5 A0.01 YCNIIEC IFAL YBPE MO,II XECNYICR SOEOlES EI.C LIOiIMG FAME SCKOL~. Alq LONEA
5091E 10 PMI SOEOIE N0.0J FACILITY -FIRE ALIRM INFCTDMTId MS0.11 SiALC1UlIL ABBAEI i. TOPOGRAPHY sD.D1 sTAlkruRU ADeREYlAna9s, SYND0.5 L fF1ERAl IglES EI.11 SIIF RY -BEfltlOa 160'0 [0.1w DEYING 0 NM60.12 SCOLUN BEAR I LEVATIIONS I CLEAAR HEIGGHTSAA NOTES
CI.01 OVERATE - TOPOCJtAPXIC NAP .50.01 TYPICAL FOLMATId OE7AILS i FOOTING SCXEOLLE - sD.D7 rro¢uFaouldDflAas 1. WAREHOUSE cl.u OVERALL - EKISIING COMIIIOK A OEMDLIIId RAX NL01 AREA A ITOPI - AAO 0.Y i , WAREHOUSE t. WAREHOUSE I. WAREHOUSE I . WAREHOUSE I. WAREHOUSE
CI.11 EXLAAfID OEMSltild PLY i. WAREHOUSE NI.01 IAEA A IAOITdI -RACK PLY AI.00 DEN0.1ild PLY MI.I I AREA A ITDP) - VENTIUTId PLAN EI.01 AREA AITN) - AAO RY NI.11 AIEA I ITQI - RAO PLY 61, II AfEA A 17Cf1 - [OKREIE FLOd 0.Y WI.Y 000.1TId Y WI.OB DEMOLAITION PLAN 01.01 AREA (TO') - RACK PLAN MA 02 AREA A !BOTTOM) - RACK PLAN
AI.01 AREA A Ii0% - RAO RY X1.12 AREA A IBOITdI - VfNTILAIId 0.Y E1.01 AREA A IBOTidI • RACK PLY NI.I2 ALL / IBDT1OO - AAd PLY 01.12 MNA A IBOTIdI - COICAEIE FLOd RY YA1.01 AIEA A IAOndI AI.02 YEA A IBOTidI - AAd PLY X1.11 AREA A 111 - HEATING PLY EI.10 YAREHpISE • LIGHTING O[KNSIONS PLY fll.ll l0E 1,3,5 -OYEAEY FIRE PIBIECTId 0.Y OI.II YAPEIIDI/E SLY RY MAI.II OVERALL YoAE1gUS 2. LAYOUT AI.IY OYEAAII YAAENOUSE RY MI.22 YEA A IBOTTdI -xEAi11N RY E1.11 AREA A TIN) - t[OIi1XG RY RI.11 7DIf 2,1,6 -OYENEAD FIRE NBTE[Tid PLY CF 1.72 @NAETE ttOd OETAllS YI.II AFEA A ITOPI - MI.31 AREA 200A, 1 S90A - HYAC PLANS Ei.l2 AREA A IBpTidl • LIOIIIMO PLY N1, R I0E 1,9.11 • OYENEY FIRE PpfECTld RY YI.12 /REA A KBOTid) MA 10 OVERALL WAREHOUSE PLAN will AREA A (TOP) - FLOUR PLAN .1.12 AREA A (BOTTOM) - FLOOR PLAN
02.01 OVERALL - LAYOIi i DIIF361d PLY AI.II YEA A Ii0P1 - FLOd PLAN MI.Ii NVAC OETAllS EI.21 AIE.1 A ITOPt - POIEA RY fPl.l3 ~ 1,11,12 - OAEIIEIN FL PAOIECTId RY YI.11 EKIER[d ELEVATI A1.12 IKEA A IDOTIdI - ROd PLY M1.12 HEATING SYSTEM DETAILS EI.21 AiA A IDDTIOY - POEA 1L~ NI.JI AAG 11M -9/8F8 ROd RIMS YI.22 EKTFRIpi ELEVATI C1.11 /TEA I - LAYO1i 1 DIM[NStd 0.Y AI.II YAREXOISE OEfAilS NI.1] NVAC DETAILS EI.2S YAIOgEE LIB, fill 1 ~ - CddI1T RAffi .1.21 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS 1441.22 EXTERIOR ELEVATION 6 LOUVER TYPES w1.31 WALL SECTIONS
C2.12 AREA 2 - LAYpIT i DIKNSId RY 11.15 YAfENOIIff OffAILS FPi.lI YEA A - BE10LITId RM 1111.31 PALL ffCTlN15 C2.1J AREA i - UYdi 1 DIMFNSId RY AI.21 EKiERId ELEYATI016 EI.31 LEI A Il~t - YMRATId / IEAIING POYER RY NI.N YEA A - ffCTid FIRE PAOIEtIId N11.3t PILL ffCTI0X5 { AI.22 ENiERId ELEVATIO61 LOUVER iYRS EI.32 AIEI A /BOT1OU -YENTIUtId /HEATING PpEA RY NISI FIFE PAOTECiId lE1E1O5 i DETAILS Yi.lt Mi USED MA 1.32 WALL SECTIONS & DETAILS w1.37 NOT USED w1.38 WALL SECTIONS
C1.11 AREA 1 - LAYdT i OIMEXS[d RY A1.31 YAII ffCf ICM PI.I I AREA A ITOPI - RUBIMG PLY EI.11 AREA 101, SN 15118 - LIOITINC PLANS NI.51 FIRE PROIECTid NIdNFR DETAILS YI.70 YILL SECT1O6 AI.32 YALE ffCTIp15 1 DETAllS PI.12 AREA A lB0Tid1 -ROBING RY EI.12 AIEA 200A, 2108, 300A 0 /DO - IIGXi[NG RAMS WI.Y AREA A - EYIXWYE g1ACING Fd SEISMIC 1OES YI.11 YAfSlY6F YIL1 I 3. GRAD [NG AI.37 YALE SECTIONS 1 pETAlLS PI.21 A[IUDI 20W. SODA -RIMING RN6 i OEtAILS EI.Si ARA IDO, 500 A 51d - POIEA RAX$ YI.It FILE AISEA OETAI MA 41 WAIIFNOM WALL FRAMING w1.42 FIRE RISER DETAILS MA 1.51 DOOR SCEOLES & DOOR TYPES MA 52 WINDOW TYPES, DOOR A WINDOW DETAILS
C3.DI OVERALL - CA/111MC RY AI.31 PALL ffCT101151 DETAILS PI.JI AIffA bI1CAY5 - 0.11BIMC EI.S2 AfEA 100A, AETURII /AEA - POIEA BANS YI.51 0081 SOEpAES I AL;D YAIL SECTIONS ELiI ELECTRICAL OETAllS NAL52 YIYd TYPES, d AL11 YAREHdSE YALE FRYING EL12 ELECTRICAL DETAILS MA1.62 YFA JOOA - RI w1.62 AREA 300A - FLOOR PLANS
C7.11 AREA I - dA01NG RY AL12 fIAE RISER DETAILS EL73 ELECTRIL0. DETAILS [7.11 AREA 2 • CRYING RY AI.51 OODR SCNEORES i Wd iYRS EI.11 ELECfRiC01 DETAILS [7.13 AREA 3 • CRYING RY AI.51 Y[MOd 1YRS. GOON i Y(NOd DE1All5 EI.AI OIIE LINE DIAWJI • AAfA A ME I.II AREA A ITNI - IE I.11 AREA A (TOP) - ROOF PLAN IE 1.12 AREA A (BOTTOM) - ROOF PLAN ME 1.21 PALLET RACK -PLAN 6 DETAILS
C].I/ AREA 1 - dYING 0.Y AI.SJ Wd, YIIOOY i MISCELLANE0113 OEIAllS EI.91 PANElB0Y0 SdFD0E5 MEI.I2 ARA A IBO(idl ACS/ XILLNOE ELCYAlIOYS i DETAILS E1.91 PANElBOYO SCIEpEFS ME 1.21 PALLET AAO - % 4. DRAINAGE A1.61 AREA 20W, JOBA, 100 i SODA - FLOd RYS ffL22 PALLET RAO - fl AL65 ARA IOD, 200A, 2008, SODA, SODA 1 5000 - ERAAOD fLOd RAN$ ME 1.22 PALLET RACK - PLAN & DETAILS
CL 01 EKISIING DRAINAGE AIEA NY AL71 AOON FINISH SCNEONE JLII AREA 4 ITOPI - I G.02 DEVELOPED dAINA(f AREA MY Al.il ~FIECIEO CEII NLIRIM W { CdTAOL - JI.12 AREA A (BOTId) JL21 BY JOIST PIJEL II AREA A (TOP) - BAR JOIST PLAN fl: 12 AREA A (BOTTOM) - BAR JOIST PLAN J1.21 BAR JOIST PANEL POINT LAYOUTS
C/.11 HIDRAILI[ CALCLLAild6 11.91 INIEAId ELfVATIpIS
G.21 OVERALL - SidIM DAAIX RY SI.II AR£A A ITOPI - FOIOATId RY 51.11 AREA A IBOTIdI- FCINOAIId PLY U.31 YfA I - SiOiX dAIN 0.Y SI.IS YYENOUSE SLY RY
CI, S2 AREA 2 - SigDl GRAIN RY 51.31 PILASTER DETAILS U.33 AREA 3 - STORK GRAIN 0.Y INOi INOUOFDI 51.31 fdNDATION DETAILS 51.73 FOUBATId DETAILS CI,N YEA A - $IdM dtAIN 0.Y 51.75 ANCHd 80.1 RiAILS
SL11 PALLET RACK - RY i DETAILS CIAI STOPoI DRAIN PROFILES -LINES A-20, A-J0, A-10 51.11 PALLET RAO - RY i OETAllS
A-S0, A-60 G.51 STOd ORAIX OETAllS - SHEET I 0 7
C/,52 STCRM OAA[N DEiAllS - SHEET 2 a 7 CLS3 STORM dA[N DETAILS - SXEEi S CF 7
5. EROSION CONTROL C5.01 EROSId 6 ff01NEXTATId [d1R0 RY
C5.11 EA031d i ff01NENTAiId CdiRDI DEtAllS
6. PAVING C6.01 OVERALL • PAVIIG 0.Y
C6.02 OVERALL - ALTERNATE PAVING RAN 7, SiTE IMPROVEMENTS
C7.01 SITE IMPRDVEIEXT DETAILS - StIEEt I 0 5 C7.01 SITf IYPROVEIExi DETAILS - SXfEi 2 CP i
C7.03 SITE IIPA04EIENT DEGILS - SIEEI J 6 3
6. UTILITY C8.01 OVERACT -U71LRY RY
CLiI YEA I -UTILITY RY C1.11 YEA 2 • UTILITY 0.Y
C8.13 AREA 7 - UTILITY RY INDI INCLUOE01 CLN AREA A • UTILITY RY
CB.11 SYIIYY SEIER PROFILES -LINES
C8.71 UTILITY OEfAiLS - SHEET I W 2 CD.31 UTILITY DETAILS - SNEEI 1 Di 2
x
N C 8 ~w,•
P r°5~i'~ N Z. 4 se• 9 .9
S#. 13WL ri~5
n ,~,EM„
8~ oeo
n~ o:. y o•. SSUE FOR PERMIT
~i nE ;a F MAY 10, 2004
moon E s°-. ' °-aa3
~li8rc& a ~ Copyright © 2004 by Carter & BurgeSS.Inc.

_ J~ 1
A TALL A~REYIATIp6 AAE NOI IEOESSARILY USED aN 1xE DRIYIW57 ITEM ezisrlrvc New SITE IMPROVEMENT NOTES: N T
PROPERTY LINE OA RIGHT Of WAY LINE U T I L I T i "O " E O~ W, q A W N ' tr
A BUILDING i. BgAOARY INFORMATION REFLECTS A BaNOARY SURVEY PEAFIX(MED BY CARTER 6 BURGESS, DATED 02/22/01. 1, E%CEPT FOR FIRE WATER LINES (REFER TD I/C8.31, 2/C8.31 ER TO I/C8.31, 2/C8.311, TERMINATE ALL UTILITIES AND CONDUITS 5' FROM d'•°.,,
FACE OF BUILDING. REFER TO IECHANICAL ANO ELECTRICAL AC ACRES PB POND BOTTOM BUILDING CaUMN LINE NA 2. ALL PAVING DIMENSIONS ARE TO EDGE OF PAVEMENT DR BACK OF CURB IRILESS SHOMI OTHERWISE. PC POINT CF CIAiVATURE 2, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL LOCATE ANO PROTECT ALL E%ISTINC U IANICAL AND ELECTRICAL PLANS FOR CONTINUATION. .
PI POINT OF INTERSECTION CENTERLINE ROADWAY 3. CONTRACTOR SHALL PROTECT ALL PROPERTY CORNERS. DAMAGED AS A RESULT OF CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE REPAIRED PL OR Q PRWERTY LINE OF THE Ui1L TTY COMPANY. ALL UTILITIES AS SNOVW ARE AP PROTECT ALL EXISTING UTILITIES PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. ANY UTILITIES LION SHALL BE REPAIRED AT THE CONTRACTOR'S EXPENSE TO THE SATISFACTION (LITIES AS SHOWN ARE APPROXIMATE LOCATION. UTILITY COMPANY CONTACTS
PSF POUNDS PER SQUARE FOOT EASEMENT 4. CONTRACTOR SHALL LOCATE AND PROTECT ALL E%ISTINC UTILITIES PRIOR TO ANY FENCE CONSTRUCTION, AMY AAE AS FOLLOWS: PS[ PIXMOS PER SQUARE INCH UTILITIES DAIUCEO AS A RESULT ~ SITE FENCE CDNSTRUC110N SHALL BE REPAIRED AT THE CONTRACTOR'S E%PENSE B-0 BACK TO BACK OF CURBS PT POINT OF TANGENCY EDGE OF PAVEMENT TO THE SATISFACTION OF THE CONSTRIICIION MANAGER. NATEA/SEWER -CITY OF XENDEASON ATTN: fRAN
BC BUILDING CONTRACTOR PYC Pp,YYINYL CHLORIDE 180 BECKF01~ DRIVE BLDG. BUILDING PVMT PAVEMENT CURB 5. REFER TO ARCHITECTURAL ANO STRUCiIIAAL PLANS FOR ACTUAL BUILDING DIMENSIONS, DIMENSIONS $HOYM TO FACE HENDERSON, NC 27536 ATTN: FRANK FRAZIER 36
BN BENCHMARK SECUTITY FENCE Np ~ BUILDING ASSURE THAT BUILDING FACE IS A U4[FpTN DISTANCE OF I.1T' FROM THE CENTERLINE OF E%TER[OA (2521431-6026 BOC BACK Of CURB CAIRN FOR DRY COWS ARAI 1.42' FOR AEFAIGER0.i[p4. CALLOUTS FOR BUILDING CORNER REFER 70 FACE OF
BOF BOTTOM OF FWTING PARKING SPACES Hp / , / / / / FOUNDATION WALL CORNER. ELECTRIC - CAROLINA POWER AND LIGHT ATTN: WRI BW 80TH WAYS -/-/-/-[-LL_ 602 RALEIGH AOAO LIGHT ATTN: GERIAL PROCTOR
WIMBER W PARKING SPACES NA I© 6. ALL PAVEMENT STRIPING SHALL BE 4' NIOE Sa10 YELLOW PAINT STRIFE, UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. STRIPES XENOEASON, NC 27536 C R RADIUS IRDICATED AS DASHED SHALL BE 4' WIDE ID' LONG PAINT STRIPES AT 20' O.C, (2521438-1906 AC REFRIGERATION CONTRACTOR HANOICAPPEO PARKING qA 36
ACP REINFORCED CONCRETE P[PE T. BOLLARDS ARRRO TRANSFORMER 5 SN[TCHCEAA TO BE SPACED ~ 5'-0' OC 6 A MINIMUM OF 5'-0' AWAY FAON PRO. NATURAL GAS - PSNC ENERGY ATTN: JERA AE: REFER T0, REFERENCE PAVEMENT STRIPING Np ~ REMOVABLE BOLLARDS TO BE PLACED ! DWRS ON TRANSfORREAS. 1980 RUIN CREEK ROAD ATTN: JERRY W. PARRISH )AD
C CONDUIT AEINF. REINFOAC[NG OA REINFORCED NENDERSa4, NC 27536 CCT CHLORINE CONTACT TANK REO'0 REQUIRED DIREC710N0.L ARROW NA b 8, PLACE WHEEL STOPS iN THE TRACTOR PARKING AREA, CENTERED IN THE FRONT OF EACH PARKING SPACE AND 1252)431-3405 C.f, CUBIC FEET ROW RIGHT OF MAY PERPENDICULAR TO THE ANGLED STRIPES. 36
CFC CONCRETE FL WA CONTRACTOR RP RADIUS POINT BOLLAA05 NA ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ TELEPHONE - SPRINT ATTN: ROBE CI CASs IRON RV RAW MATER 85S BURR STREET ATTN: ROBERT L. HARRIS
C/L OA ~ CENTERLINE CAST-IN-PLACE BOLLARD ~ NENDEASON, NC 27536 0.A CLEAR CMP CORRl1CATE0 METAL PIPE TREES /-Y~Y"ti\ xp (2521430-3539 16
nu CONCRETE MASOWTY UNIT CURVE DATA BUILDING PAD NOTES: DDUNTY -MANGE MINTY ATTN: T.R. C.O. CLEAMKIUT NA O 156 CHURCH ST., SUITE 003 ATTN: T.R. (RANDY) NEWMAN IITE 003
ca. cauMN SC SITE CONTRACTOR HENDEASON, NC 27536-5574 CONC. CONCRETE SCR. SCHEDULE WETLANDS I, THE SiTE CONiRACTW SHALL PREPARE BUILOINO PAO AND FOUti7ATI0N SUBGAADE PER DETAIL 14/C7.01. (2521738-2080 CONST. CONSTRUCT 50 STORM DRAIN 2. THE $IiE CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL THE BOTTgI II' OF BASE MATERIAL BELOW ALL BLDG, SLABS i0 A TOLERANCE 16-5574 6 Y( H
CONT. CONTIW10115 SEC SECURITY W !0.10', REFER i0 14/C1,01. THE BASE MATERIAL SHALL BE CRUSHED STOFE CWIFORNING iD SECTION 520 3. CONTRACTOR SHALL REFER TO STORM DRAIN PLANS AND PROFILI CONTR. CONTRACTOR SF SNARE FEE1 CONTOUR ANO VALUE OF THE NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT W TRANSPORTAT[al SPECIFICATIONS. THE CRUSHED STONE SUBBASE SHALL BE NEW STORM DRAIN LINES. DRAIN PLANS AND PROFILES FOR INFORMATION CONCERNING ALL EXISTING AND
CP CENTER POINT SHT SLUDGE HOLDING TAW( - A23- COW ACTED TO AT LEAST 95% MAXiWW DENSITY AS DETERMINED BY MODIFIED PROCTOR PROCEDURES (ASTW DIS57), CPH CONTRA POINT HORIZONTAL SP SPARE SPOT ELEVATTDN 623.5 q, CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE INSTALLATION OF UTILITIES CPP CORRUGATED POLYETHYLENE P[PE 50 SQUARE 23.5 REQUIRED MINIMUM DEPTHS OF COVER. TxE CONTRACTOR SHALL ALLATION OF UTILITIES AND CONDUITS TO AVOID CONFLICTS AND PROVIDE
CPY CONTROL POINT VERTICAL 55 SANITARY SEVER SLOPE tlLOCKS REQUIRED TO ASSURE PROPER INSTALLATION OF MATER CY C161C YARDS STA $TAiIONING NA THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE ANY ADDITIONAL BENDS WITH THRUST INSTALLATION OF WATER MAINS AND LATERALS.
STD. $TANDARO i0P OR TOE OF SLOPE NA 5. WATER AND SANITARY SEWER L(NE$ SHALL BE INSTALLED WITH HALL BE INSTALLED WITH A MIN. SEPARATION OF 10 FEET HORIZONTALLY AND ING DETAIL, REFER TO 4/C8.31. -
SWGR SWITCHGEAR A[DCE OR VALLEY LINE NA STORM DR A I N NOTE ~ 1.5 FEET VERTICALLY, FOR TRENCHING DETAIL, REFER i0 4. ENT _ ~ 6. IN THE EYENi Of A CONFLICT BETWEEN WATER LINES ANO STDI C EURINE $WALE OA DITCH WATER LINE DOWNMAAD IN SUCH A MANNER 50 THAT THE PIPE I EN WATER LINES AND STORM DRAIN, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL EITHER ADJUST THE
D DEPTH ~ i. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR NOTIFYING ALL UTILITY COMPANIES BEFORE CW(STAUCTION AND VERIFYING DEFLECTION AND JOINT STRESS AAE NOT E%CEEDEO OR PROVIDI DET. DETAIL LWATION OF ALL EXISTING UTILITIES ANp STORM GRAIN STRUCTURES PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. CONTRACTOR IS NNER SO THAT THE PIPE MANUFACTURER'S RECOMMENDATIONS ON PIPE NOT EXCEEDED OR PROVIDE BENDS, REFER TO 6/C8.31.
DIR. DIAMETER FLON ARROW 3% - AESPONS[BLE FOA NOTIFYING MICN OF ANY COI~LICTS BETWEEN PLANS AND E%ISTINC CONDITIONS. T. WATER LINES SHALL HAVE A MINIWIM COYER OF 3 FEET ABOVE DIP DUCTILE IRON PiPE i TANGENT COVER OF 3 FEET ABOVE PIPE TO FINISHED SURFACE. •Q m amirwo9
D.O. T, DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 1 OA TEL TELEPHONE STORM DRAIN FLUME Ap ~ 2. CONiRACTpt [S RESPONSIBLE FQA REPAIRS OF DAMAGE TO ANY E%ISTINC INPROYEMENTS DURING CONSTRUCTION. B. ALL CWRDINAiES ANO DIMENSIONS ARE i0 ixE CENTERLINE 01 DW DOMESTIC WATER iC 10P OF CURB r i0H TOTAL DYNAMIC HEAD CRATE INLET 3. ALL PIPES ENTERING STORM ORA[N STRUCTURES SHALL BE GROUTED i0 ASSURE WATERTIGHT CONNECTIONS. 9. CONTRACTOR SHALL ADHERE TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF VANCE C( RE TO THE CENTERLINE OF UTILITY AND STRUCTURES. " • W W EOUIREMENTS OF VANCE COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA. CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE N o < 0 0 0
TNG TRUCK MAINTENANCE GARACf NA ~ INSPECTION AND TESTING OF ALL UTILITTES WITH THE APPROI _ 36' 4. ALL STORM DRAIN PiPE SHALL BE RCP ASTM C-T6, QA55 III, HALL TYPE 'B' I1N.E55 OTHERWISE NOTED. ALL CONNECTIONS TO E%ISTINC UTILITIES SHALL BE COOADINi iP 10P OF PAVEMENT STORM DRAIN LINE AND SIZE _ _$D _ _ _ _ _ ILITIES WITH THE APPROPRIATE AUTHORITIES PRIOR TO BACKFILLING. ITIES SHALL BE COORDINATED WITH AUTHORITIES. CONSTRUCTION SHALL COMPLY
TW TRUCK WASH - - - WITH ALL GOVERNING CWES. CONTRACTOR SHALL CONDUCT ALL TYP. TYPICAL 5, All STORM DRAIN MANHOLES SHALL BE FLUSH WiTH FINISHED GRADE AND HAVE NEAYY DUTY (H-20 TRAFFIC BEAR[NCI :TOR SHALL CONDUCT ALL REQUIRED TESTING TO AUTHORITIES' SATISFACTION.
E EAST IFOA CWRDINAiE51 CdST-IRON STANDARD BOLT-0OWN LIDS. LIDS SHALL BE LABEI.EO 'STORM SEVER'. 10. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL COMA)UCT A PRESSURE TEST ON ALL FIF EA EACH STORM DRAIN MANHOLE _ _ ~ _ _ _ APPROVAL AUTHORITY AND THE OWNER'S INSUiAHCE CARRIER. EC ELECTRICAL CONTRACTOR U 6. ALL STORM pRAIN STRUCTURES SHALL COMFORMR TO NORTH CARa1NA D.O.T. SPECIFICATIONS EXCEPT AS MODIFIED BY TH SPECIFICATIONS FOR WATER LIME TESTING. RESSURE TEST ON ALL FIRE WATER LINES TO THE SATISFACTION OF THE LOCAL Z 'S INSURANCE CARRIER. TESTS SHALL BE 225 PSI FOR 2 HOURS. REFER TO Q ;TING.
Ef EACH FACE STORM ORA[N HEADWALL NA ~ CONTRACT DOCUENiS. II. THRUST BLOCKS SHALL BE PROVIDED ON ALL HATER LINE TEES, EG EDGE OF GRAVEL DOMESTIC NATEA ANO SIZE T. COORDINATES ANO DIMENSIONS SHOWN AAE TO THE CFW7ERLINE W PIPES ANO MANHOLES. TIE-DOVN BLOCKING SHALL BE PROVIDED ON ALL MATER LINE 1 cn U 3N ALL MATER LINE TEES, PLUGS, AND BENDS, REFER TO 7/C8.31. VERTICAL Z Z
EL. ELEVATION ~ URAIERGRWND CWIOUIT DW- 6• ' -DW-'~ ELEC ELECTRICAL (FDA UTILITIE51 UG UNAERGRWNO CONCRETE CRADLE SHALL BE MDYIOED ON ALL VERTICAL BEND'. EP EDGE OF PAVEMENT V.N,O. UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE FIRE WATER LINE ANO SIZE __.y__12'_ -FV I2' B. ALL DRAINAGE STRUCTURES SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED WITH 9000 PS[ MINIWM STRENGTH COHCAETE AND GRADE 60 OR FLANGES NITN CONCRETE. )ED ON ALL WATER LINE VERTICAL BENDS DOWNWARD, REFER TO 8/C8.31. ON ALL VERTICAL BENDS UPWARD, REFER TO 6/C8.31. DO NOT COVER BELLS Q
EO EWAL UNREINF UMWiEINFORCEO WATER GATE VALVE REINFORCING. ALL E%POSED CORNERS SHALL BE CHAKEREO. - - - - 12. ANY EXISTING THRUST BLWKS OA AESTAAiNTS SHALL BE AEN01 W EACH WAY UST UNDERGROUND STORAGE TANK 9. WERE EXCESSIVE FLUME LENGTHS HAKE Ca4T1M10115 Pqp DIiFIC0.T, WNTRACiOR MAY CONSTRUCT IN }D FWT THE REPLACEMENT, MIERE REWIRED, SHALL BE AT THE CONTRA d 0- Z MAINTS SHALL BE REMOVED BY THE CONTRACTOR TO ALLOW WORK TO PROCEED. J X O
E%IST EXISTING FIRE HYDRANT EKP, E%PANSICN - -'O SECTIONS CONIECTED BY KEYED CONSTRLCiIpI JOINTS. TIESE JOINTS SHALL BE SEALED WITH TIE SATE SEALANT 65 SHALL BE AT THE CONTRACTOR'S EXPENSE. w BE EITHER DUCTILE IRON OR PVC. DUCTILE IRON PIPE SHALL BE EITHER
TWTUSi BLOCKING USED FOR SITE PAVEMENT. AE IREORCING SHALL BE CdttIMIOUS AT THE JOINTS. CpISTRUCT1011 JOINTS SHALL NOi 13, SANITARY SEWER PIPE WTEA IAL MAY BE EITHER DUCTILE IRON ~ ~ BE USED WITHIN 5 FEET OF DRAW BREAKS. PUSH-ON OA MECHANICAL JOINT, THICKNESS CLA55 51, 200 PS F PROPANE LINE 6 SIZE _ _ p _ _ _ _ P 11/1' A21. 51 (AWVA CI511, TAR COATED AND CEUENT LINED PER AWM ;KNESS CLASS 51, 200 PSI PRESSURE RATING IN ACCORDANCE WITH ANSI o L1J ID CEMENT LINED PER AWWA 0104. JOINTS SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH
TEAT 4EATICAL ANSI A21.11 IAWWA Cill). PYC PIPE ANO FITi INGS SHALL C Y0. VaUME NATURAL GAS LINE A SIZE _ _ G _ _ _ _ G 4_ D-3034, SpR 35. JOINTS SHALL BE INTEGRAL BELL AND SPIG 'E AND FITTINGS SHALL COMPLY WITH THE LATEST REVISIONS OF ASTM N 0 INTEGRAL BELL AND SPIGOT TYPE WITH RUBBER GASKETS OR APPROVED EOUAL. (o Z
F8 FACE OF BUILDING SANITARY SEWER LINE d SiZE B' 14. WATER MAIN PIPE MATERIAL NAY BE DUCTILE IRON OR PYC, 0 FC FIRE PROTECTION CONTRACTOR - -'$S- - - _SS_ EROS I ON AND SE D I ME NT CON T R O L N OTE S~ MECHANICAL JOINT, THICKNESS CLASS SI FOA DEPTHS LESS TH f-F FACE TO FACE SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE SS MI GREATER, 250 PSI PRESSURE RATING IN ACCORDANCE WITH ANS )UCTILE IRON OR PVC. DUCTILE IRON PIPE SHALL BE EITHER PUSH-ON OR U i 51 FOR DEPTHS LESS THAN 8 FEET AND CLASS 52 FOR DEPTHS 8 FEET OR
Ff FINISHED FLOOR ' - ~ - - - - LINED PER AWWA C104. JOINTS SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE MIT FG FINISHED GRADE SANITARY SEWER CLEAN-OUT C.O. C.O. - I, Cd4TAACT¦1 SMLL INSTALL All PEN [RETER FILTER FABRIC FENCES Alb SEDIMENT CONTRA BARRIERS PRIOR TO COKOAM TO AWWA C900, PRESSUE 0.ASS 200. IN ACCORDANCE WITH ANSI A21.51 (AWWA CI51), TAR COATED AND CEMENT Q .L BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH ANSI A21.11 (AWWA CI11). PVC PIPE SHALL
FH FIRE HYDRANT N WATER ~ - - - CLEARING OR (¦WO(1¦• FL FLOML[NE W/ WITx OVERHEAD TELEPHONE _ _ pl{i_ _ _ -ONT - I5. ALL WATER MANS A10 APPURTENANCES AAE TO BE INSTALLED I .ASS 200. i ARE TO BE INSTALLED IN ACCORDANCE WITH AWWA CGOO-82 AMERICAN
PLC. FLANGE MM WAL-HART 2. CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL ADDITIONAL SEDIMENT C0111RQ IAI¦[EAS AS NECESSARY TO CONTAIN ALL lbNSTRUCTION WLTERV'OAIfS ASSOCIATION AND THE NATIONAL FIRE PREVENTION FOC FACE OF CURD WMCN WAL-MART CONSTRUCTION MANAGER OVERHEAD ELECTRIC PRIMARY _ __pxE_ _ _ -ORE- SEDIMENT ON SiTE. FPH EIRE PUW HOUSE 16. ALL FIRE RISER FLANGES SHALL USE TYPE 304 $TA IREESS SiE iTIONAL FIRE PREVENTION ASSOCIATION STANDARDS.
FPR FIRE PROTECTION RISER W/S. WATEAUSUAFACE IRIDERCRa1ND ELECTRIC PRIMARY _ _,E _ _ _ _ _ E _ 2_I;C 7. CWTRACTOR SHALL MAINTAIN ALL EROSIgI A10 SEDIMENT 1A71RTRa BARRIERS DURING CONSTRUCTION. FS fINI5HE0 SURFACE WWTP WASTE WATER TREATMENT PLANT 17. FIRE HYDRANTS SHALL BE MJELLER SUPER CENTURION OR EQUAL TYPE 304 STAINLESS STEEL BOLTS. CA W iPER CENTURION OR EDUAL PROVIDED WITH TWO 214' NOZZLES. ~
FT. FWT OA FEET TELEPHONE CDNDUI7 T___ _T 2'[ 1. ANY ACCIDENTAL RELEISE OF SEBiIENT FAgI TIE SITE SM4L BE 0.EANE0 LIP BY THE CONTRACTOR. FV F[RE PAOTECT[ON MATER I8. ALL VALVES ANO OTHER APPURTENANCES ON All FIRE PROiECTI X LIGHTING CONDUIT L $I2E NA ~ L_2 ~ S. Rllgt iD 1NE COMPLETION OF 1TE PROJECT, CDIITRACTOR SMALL 0.EAM OUT ALL STORM DRAINAGE STRUCTURES AND fACTgiY MUTUAL APPROVED. ALL VALVES SHALL BE SiAMA1AR0, '.S ON ALL FIRE PROTECTION LINES SHALL BE UNDERWRITERS LABORATORY/ co O
COMMUNICATIONS/DATA CORW)U[i NA - UC 2-1'C RESTORE ALL DITCHES AND PONDS TD DESIGNED GRADES. VES SHALL BE STANDARD, BELOW GROUND, GATE VALVES WITH BOX & COVER. Z Z
6. CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE A TEMPORARY GRAVEL DRIVE FOR ALL CONSTAUCTIDN ACCESS ONTO EXISTING PAVED RDlOS. 19. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL ALL WATER YALYE BO%ES SUCH %FMR TAANSfWMEA PULL 80% NA ¦ INCHES ABOVE TXE FLANGED JOINTS OF THE VALVE COVER, [T 7. Ca4TAACiOA SHALL REMOVE ALL SEDIMENT CONTRA BARRIERS AT THE COMPLETION OF CONSTRUCTION. BE APPAO%[MATELY ON LINE WITH THE HUB OA UPPER PAAf OF WATER VALVE BOXES SUCH THAT THE BASE OF THE BOX RESTS TWO OR MORE O ff THE VALVE COVER. IT IS REQUIRED THAT THE OPERATING NUT OF THE VALVE J HUB OR UPPER PART OF THE VALVE BOX BASE. Q
G GAS TRANSFORMER PAD NA ~ GAL GALLONS 8. EARTH CONTAIWENT BEAM TO BE LOCATED ALONG PERIRETEA OF ALL AREAS OF FUEL STORAGE ANA HAMmLING. 20. ALL FIRE WATER YALYE BOXES SHALL BE DRILLED AND TAPPED GALV. GALVANIZED EMERGENCY GENERATOR NA ® COVER LIP, THE SITE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FO BE DRILLED AND TAPPED TO RECEIVE A 1/I' X *20 BOLT 2' BELOW THE VALVE 5; w
GH WARDHWSE CONTRACTOR TO ESTABLISH A VALVE NIMBERING SYSTEM ANO SH GPD GALLONS PER DAY TR YEAR LIGHT $iANDARO NA ~ EACH YALYE BO% WRH 0.U4' % X20 Ba T. HALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR COORDINATING WITH THE FIRE PROTECTION W Z UMBERING SYSTEM AND SHALL ATTACH A BRASS NUMBER TAG TO THE INSIDE OF jr W OL T. E VALVE WRENCHES TO THE WAL-MART CONSTRUCTION MANAGER. m
GPM GALL~lS PER MINUTE SIGN NA t p1, THE COHiAACTOR SHALL SIPPLY 2 GATE YALYE WRENCHES TO THI
H SWITCHCEAR PAO NA PAVEMENT AND JOINTING NOTES: 22. *10 50.10 COPPER TRACER WIRE SMALL BE INSTALLED ON ALL L BE INSTALLED ON ALL UNDERGOUND FIRE WATER LINES. Q Cid
ELECTRIC MANHOLE NA ~ I. SAY CUTTTNG SHALL BE GONE WITHIN 8 HOURS W POUR OA AS SOON A$ CONCRETE CAN SUPPORT VEIGHT, ANO PROVIDE HC HANDICAPPED A NEAT NT WHICH I$ TRUE IN ALiCWENT. w w J
HD. HEAD Ha HYDRAULIC GRADE LINE 2. LONG[i11DINAL CONSTRUCTION JOINTS I'LT') SHALL BE REW IAED AT THE END DF d OAT'S WORK, UNLESS [T ENDS AT HCRIZ HORIZONTAL A DOWELED EXPANSION JOINT I'N'N, EDGE EXPANSION JOINT f'E'1, LONGITUDINAL CONSTRUCTION JOINT WITH TIE - O fA Co
NP NIGH POINT SECTION MARK S BARS ('L'1, OR THICKENED CONSTRUCTION ('T'l JOINT $HONN ON THE PLANS,
C 7.01 3. ALL JOINTS AAE TO CONTIWIE THRaUGH THE CIHB. CA
1, RADIAL JOINTS SHALL 8E NO SHORTER THAN L5'. I.D. INSIDE DIAMETER ENLARGED PLAN/ 5 5. JOINT SPACING SHALL NOT E%CEEO IS' IN EITHER DIRECTION VITH NO DIMENSION LESS THAN i5% OF TxE
IN. INCHES DETAIL REFERENCE CT. DI _ . _ _ _ ' PERPENDICULAR DIMENSION. EXCEPTIalS ARE DOLLY PAO STRIPS WITH NA%IMUM SPACING OF 10' AHD 80' CONCRETE iVY INVERT OR FLOYLINE I I DOCK APRONS WITH I6' JOINT SPACING.
I I 6, CaTTRAtiOR SHALL USE A THICKENED EDGE E%P0.NSIOx ('E' I JOINT AAOIND THE PERIMETER OF ANY BLOCKOUi IN THE SITE ELECTRICAL AND CC
J I I CONCRETE PAYING. 7. ALL CONSiRUCT10N JOINTS SHALL BE SARM, QEANED OF DEBRIS, BLOWN DRY AND IM~EDIAiELY SEALED KITH ODW I. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL VER(fY LOCATIONS OF EXISTING UTIL[ L AND CONDUITS NOTES:
JT. JOINT 3 CORNING 890 SL SEALANT FOR ALl HOA[20NTAL JOINTS ANO DOW CORNING 888 SEALANT FOA ALL VERTICAL JOINTS. iD AVOID ANY OTHER $IiE UTILITIES. ELEVATION KEY CT 01 8. WD SHAPED PANELS SHALL BE REINFORCED WITH +7 BARS Ai 24' EACH WAY. AN WO SHAPED PANEL IS CONSIOEAED 'IONS OF EXISTING UTILITIES BEFORE EXCAVATION AND COORDINATE HIS WORK
L 2. ALL EHDERGROUND CONDUITS SHALL BE INSTALLED WITH PULL W i0 BE ONE IN MHiCH THE SLAB TAPERS TO d SHARP ANGLE, WHEN THE LENGTH TO WIDTH RATIO E%CEEDS 3 TO I, OR 1EIbILE STRENGTH OF 2000 PWNDS. ALL CONDUITS SHALL HA KAIEN A SLAB IS ME(THER SQUARE NOR AECTANGULAA. INSTALLED WITH PULL WIRES BY SITE CONTRACTOR. PULL WIRES SHALL HAVE A ALL CONDUITS SHALL HAVE A MINIMUM OF 24' OF COVER. y m
9. CONTRACTOR SHALL SUBMIT JOINTING PLAN FOR CONCRETE ALTERNATE FOR REYIEN. 3. PROVIDE PYC-COATED RIGID STEEL ELBOWS IN UNDEAGROIART NO l LENGTH aF LENGTH. c BOWS IN UNDERGROUND NON-METALLIC CONDUIT RUNS FOR ALL BENDS REGARDLESS °o it
ID OR LBS POUNDS 10. CONTRACTOR TO PROTECT BUILDING WALL DIH LNG PAVEMENT POUR BY A METHW ACCEPTABLE TO WAl-MART L.F. LINEAR FEET CONSTAUCTIaT MANAGER. a W 9 0 r V p
LP LOW POINT 11. JOINTS RUNNING PARALLEL WITH AND CLOSEST TO THE EOCE OF PAVEMENT SxALL BE DOWELED OA TIED. ~O O Cc, ,.m 0 L ID F
M f -p N - ID f L ' y o ~ ~ 3 g
~ ° MAX. Md%IMUN `Gem ~ matazS ,
a MB METAL BunolNC GRADING NOTES ~ E MBC METAL BUILDING CONTRACTOR ~ MC MECHANICAL CONTRACTOR I. THE PROPOSED GRADES INDICATED DN THE GRADING PLAN AAE FINISHED GRADES.
MWC MANUFACTURERS Mi MANHOLE 2. CONTRACTOR SHALL RELOCATE BENCHMARKS AS NECESSARY. ANY NEW BENCHMARK LOCATIONS SHALL BE ESTABLISHED c V.l~
F ~ MIN. MINIMUM Y]TH [N A TOLERANCE W 0.010 VERTICAL FEET FROM ORIGINAL BENCHMARK. 9E N w MJ MECHANICAL JOINT
y $ 3. iOPWRAPHIC INFORMATION NAS PREPARED BY: TITAN ATLANTIC GRWP, DATED 04/22/04. IF CONTRACTOR DOES NOT 1 W o '\I ACCEPT THE EXISTING iOPOGRAPHT, A5 SHOWN ON THE PLANS W[THg1T E%CEPTiON, HE SHALL HAVE MADE, Ai HIS V ss
9 ' EXPENSE, A TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY BY A REGISTERED LAND SUIYEYDR ANO SUBMIT ]i TO THE OWNER FOA REVIEW. a 4. EXCEPT AS SPECIFIED IN SPEC IFICAT[ONS OA A T
+ N NORTH (f OR COOROINATE51 5 DIREC ED BY THE CEOTECHNICAL Y ~ c ENGINEER, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL STRIP THE UPPER 6' OF 4EGETATEO TOPSOIL PRIOR TO CONRENC[NG THE CUT AIQ NA NOT APPLICABLE FILL OPERATIONS. SUITABLE MATERIAL SHALL BE RETAINED FOA USE IN SUPPLYING A 4'-6' TOPSOIL LAYER OVER
~ p° ~ NS No~io scALE DRAWING/DETAIL REFERENCE KEY WITH~THEYRESPECTIYE SPECI~ICAilON5EA5 SHALL BE SEEDED, MULCHED, FERTILIZED ANO WATERED IN ACCORDANCE
8~ sm a o'.n O REFER TO 5. A SWELL TOR SHRINK) FACTOR OF I-3X t5 ANTICIPATED BY THE WOTECHNICdL ENGINEER. € +
~ c DRAWING/DETAIL NIMBEA 6. FOR LIMITS W GI(ADING WORK AT FACE W BU]LDING REFER TD 14/CT.01, ~ ~ 2 OC ON CENTER R E : 2/ C ~ ~ 7, CONTRACTq( SHALL CONFINE X[S YORK TO WITHIN THE 'LIMITS W CONSTRUCTION' SHOWN ON THE EROSION A
g g 3 OCEW ON CENTER EACH WAY C7.01 SEDIAENiATI@T CONTRA PLAN. °o ~ 0 00 OUTSIDE DIAMETER SHEET
o ~ SHEET NUMBER 8. THERE DAE E%ISTINC 'WETLANDS' AREAS ON SITE A$ SHOWN ON THE OVERALL TOPOGRAPHIC MAP. THE CONTRACTOR Ji u° A DASH IN THE DETAIL SHALL PRESERVE THE 'WETLANDS' AREAS IN TNEIA NATURAL CONOITiDN AT ALL TINES. c
'z TITLE BUBBLE INDICATES W a A TYPICAL DETAIL a~ C0.01
~_eo ps°:a
#.~o e
Copyright © 2004 by Carter & Burgess, Inc.

BENCH MARKS _.1._ --Tlw- - . -ROD.. WITH CAP
N 21102.21 E %22.15 _
ELEVATION 488.78 W u M u°• 2. TBM - CAP 9, IRON ROD WITH CAP •°°6~ E?
~,r'-BENCHRARK NCGS NONUIIENT 'YANCO' N 20977.38 d'~~., ..1~•/~F E 10436.94
ELEV. 513.07 N 23021.07 ELEVATION 490.84 3. TBM - CAP H. SA' IRON ROD WITH CAP
E 10523.70 N 20222.19 E 11115.25
ELEVATION 477.97
~i 11 BM4'I BENCHMARK INFORMATION FROM SURVEY AT NCGS MONUMENT 'VANCO' N 23021.07, E 11203.26
I~ ELEVATION 513.07
s
J°~ ez o
~ N
r' 2~ ~ C y^^~" O
e ~ ee „T 9' i 1[I~SN.91
N! 1! 1 0911411 . E 1 .11 a CDAMEII ~ 1~11T om~Y
M 37579.H N 21~~ ~ 1 E 9196@ `4 9!11.11 E 9191. ~ / COMXR
E Y 1111! ~ X i13i1.W , `B t _ E a M 11~7EIp10 ^e ' [OAS[ `,I' A E /P99.31 - Q , M 1169(AC IE111 1 F IRILSi
,X't171.N '1 E11771.31 , Fy`Hf7. - to IIN.»I b~ ',t X:~~90 z O
- ~xh J E iEU. ~ E IINI. N 'Fi'F' .T&9~`~'C9i 8 i A 1I111. t 69 ~ . t',s 1151. ~ , ~ Cpefe ry JJ, , .,il ~ 3 r a 11 ~ •j• ° w mll:n o ~ U
E -p0e f S I , axx^/ XQ 1P'° ,.re •.1~ C IOIN ZZ
~ 2N11.IT f ; 31,4r"-.`~~~ a„~~y - - 1' E 109Xi.5! ~ Q (L Z X0
.t 'III ' ' t'3~ i _ _.~a[• X 1M11.91 N .51 _ ` r I - - ,(J! ' a~ E 1811.1E 1.35 7 ' - 1 1 , , r y~~w_ tl~ W (1)
u o.~ -----+-----•'J;': - s' 1 .1 ` I,f~ r 1 ' A1Nf1.N - _ ,Z t , ~ ~ E uaLn W
,A • i, - ~•L `TBw `CAP 11 1' i i ~ ~`dJ Cd1E1 ' ~ _ i _ 110751.N 0 O (0 Z
ff L i I I cpX9:a 3 w
. 1 ~ ~ ' UX
I - I r I ' I ° , \J _ MEN13.N X, 111 i y , , LL
r ~ ; ; ~ 5It ' I 1 ' ' ' @=° ~ 1110.11 . ~ I . I ! i I ~ ' ; ; ~ [ 111141E I 1
` e 1•I ° I ` 1 , , X11%1 ' ~ ` r E mw.n
• 1 ~ ' ' 1~1114a \ t I ' , 9\ Y 1 , 1 , IC° I K I~ 1N69.19
r--•--------- , t Sul I 1 ~ , I ~ ~ , t un9.o ~ rll J n3lLU '17.~a ` !`I;.i l 11 • ' ' , 1 I 1 M1w~:1 a Q
1 c nl3.zr h ' ~ ~ ,h , ' I '~Y` 1 ~ > ~ IEI NU~I ~ ,,'1,1 I ~ I ~ ;14,, ~ ACnrs.1
f - ~I 1 , I I I~ ' X21169.17 J , ' - - ~ j wM1N.31• ~I I~°'{:r~,1~ 1 ~1 n~- ~ i~ I ' [1UM.N J U J -
E l111.N Ill 1,. ' , I 7 EEOXEX LINE TABLE _ 1' ~ f ~I r I X1tx9.n Q =
LINE LEN9lN BEAAIlq _ 4~tiy 1 ~ V;J/1/!(/~J 0 e • er o, q GT~yo' _0_4'-~' ' LI 19.11' X13°IIP ri'r ~ ~ 1 I r ~..r•{,~,yca ~ Ir i 1 ,p, { tON(A W Q
Lz 19. N' s6s•ic'N'r ~ A^` ~ -a+- ~ _ \f'~~' r117`sA'_ Aii~n:u La 71.10' z eCN'n'r 1 ° i _ N' [ O
u 16.9s' z uwr u•E ' ~ ~ tpRp L6 13.17' N/5°'19'60•[ l~ - III' ; a. \ ~ 1!711, 3f O
~ f' ~ E 1119L71 LB 16. N' X /1151'S/'r , ~ - GU6~1111 ~ ' 199. RR~R51U 1 y i I ~,~.,y9~[ L7 106.63' S 31551' t _ _ _ _ ~ J~R~~ ' I ~ . \~,~~"F Irl H
pi ~ R LX 100.0P S N°51'S5'E r ,Q J ~ ,III , F 19~6NR7a t [IIA[X T°^ ~ ~ Le 100.09' S 35°I7'77'E I r f l~ _ - _ i I I S IN11, lT
7 i~ I: ! ~ 1 :J~~ ' I - r I ~ 1 ~ t,llNl.u> E m9s.9s ~ u9 199.9x• s 33•seri•E 9lrlli~ , 1 ~ - 9N1qq'' ~ ' ~.,.y___ ~~'%d 1 y- vs1r, ~ E10117.Tli ~ - , P ~fl ~ ~ Ln 100.01' 530°19'21'E t i 10,, _ 1
~ ~ Llz 19x.93• sri°NS7•E ~ t _ ae, - , s _ -•a. - °qT. J IA iWExE .r . c~ $ ~ ua ro9.93• s a°N's7•E - ~~`i nnn~ ~ ~ ~ - - ~ a~ . .
i u1 109.10' 521°13'10'E I ~ i ~ ~ Y~ ervMa.ma q~~~y l'' ~ 5 Lis 100.03' S Ii°1!'11'E / M4's -.:u:~ ~~.'r. 3'~ - ~'~ti mow. T~;. +i
1' LI9 100.05' S 1141 2 E ~ / m _ s~ar15:~X~ x -rlw-_ ~ ~ y - .a ,~b Lt1 100.97' SN°II'li'E k_.\ f:~ ^1'rt'~ ,S~
R R R C( Lu 99.99' 505°31'i/'E "~K i_CbiscrrsX~ ,n 0 ~ ~ S'~~`Y~^T~i 1 S ~ L19 100.01' z 03°O7'0/'E E [dXER 7.4i 1
L49 IDO. AS' 501°t5'S5'E X19135.N la-~~ _.,°e -`1i~ ` 1 ~ § ~ F 1490.91 m-... 121 100.06' S 01°57'03'E "~,~MO,j^ ^ 4° ~ , a'a.~~'~'rl
l1a 121.63' 501°0/'11'E -'~',1 ~ a /r ~ \ I i ~ ~ ~ r y gN
~ LP3 112.97 S 06'16' 0/'E r r ' r ~'t3, i ~ 7 , ^ r ' ~ ~ i$ LPI 100.06' z02'OP 11'F ~ r ~ ` . J _ I ~L1SS3` ' F'919L11 -a
~ _ _ y L06 59.67' S /5°t/'15'r ,30'7 r W9 0
• 'E 1939:7i' x59.^~ Ay"r / ..J.~ 4CPdEA 1. 4.. 'f. i.. x 1911491 1 E 99n.x ^ 'JJ __a
Y9 NS ~ ~
i oaacs=
n' J 3~3~•. 1, a g 35° 00'00"
a a b 8s ~ ~~~~awe I PLAN TRUE NORTH
..~....ncc ~ $ s5r• v ~ a 0 , NORTH L 75 O ,
Oh p~p p~° t~W, 4e Q~. L~' L Y gyp' CA' Oa,' ff ~ ~ ~y~ i .~~o~~wr V Vu
~ ~ ~n s,o-~o ~~a yy Si ~ a y~~ S - ~ ~ `^4 0 ~`3l § ~ ~ ( a c.
L 4 i-
~ ~ u" 8 # k _ d ~ ~ :m
A o.m, uH
~i ~ c
~ ~ i; y ° SHEET
~n~u 1 OVERALL -TOPOGRAPHIC MAP 4 Y h4 U 0 200 400 600 800 01.01
CI.01 SCALE: I" 200' GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET 3
b a s~ ao
~~oz Copyright © 2004 by Carter 6 Burgess,[ne.

_ —� -� )_ .5a
�~ 0�==-=c�=--fir
EXISTING CONDITIONS & DEMOLITION PLAN
SCALE: 1' = 200'
SITE DEMOLITION NOT S•
1. EXISTING CHAIN LINK FENCE TO BE REMOVED. SEE SHEET C2.12
FOR NEW FENCE LOCATION.
2. EXISTING LIGHT POLE AND BASE TO BE REMOVED. CONSTRUCT
NEW RASE, RE: I/C8.32, AND INSTALL EXISTING LIGHT. SEE
SHEET C8.12 FOR NEW LOCATIONS.
• 35° 00'00"
TRUE NORTH
0 100 200 300 400
GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET
CoDyr;ght © 2004 by Carter & Burgess, Inc.
0
Z
O
C/) U
ZZ
� Q
�Z
W O
1 W
°oTW
�
3 CD
W
Ur
LL
SHEET
C1.11

EXISTING PAVEMENT Aln -
-BF gEnIBVETt - _ _ - - _ _ _ _ a
E%ISTING FIAE HYDRANT N x ••dNh~ ••lPi~st
EXISTING BOLLARDS TO BE 10 BE RELOCATED AEMOVED AND REPLACED.
E%ISTING FENCE EXISTING BOLLARDS TO 8E REMOVED
TO 8E REMOVED
i i ~ _ ~a ; i ~ b Ax` ' - ~ I~ ~ E%ISTING GRAVEL ~ 1 {
I ~ ~ ~ ROAD TO BE REMOVED ~ 1! I I
1 - ' f I
I I ~ EXISTING 12' FIRE WATER`LII~ TO ~E%ISAT ING fi'TFOIRE ~ ~1 I I I L BE R CO INAT~k WITH Wt)TE lII£ 1
I ~ I E NECTION TO BE REMOVED ~ / I ~H ~ ~ I I z ~ j NEW ' I ° ,

_ EXISTING GRAVEL I L~.a...~.,_ ~ ROAD TO BE REMOVED Al
- • . 'ti I-, I Z ' ~ 1
_ - , ` I i
I~..,~-a,:.. _ _._.~~-~L ~ ~ r~~~~ ~ T I I r ~
,t-' 211;1 1 I i- r . - ~ I I _ ;t I ~ EXISTING PAVEMENT TO 8E REM04ED TD ENABLE ~ I I I ~ ~ ~_s~__ . ~ ,~qUO CONSTRUCTION DF NEW BUILDING FOUNDATION. 1 g
i ",~d ~ EXIST G 2'-45° KENO TO B~ R`~1 ~ ~ I
".,,...r ' }'~~t ROTAT nSLIGN WITH NEW IRE e = lll~~~~33 p I MATE S~ $EE SHEET CB.1 ~ A 1 ~ I a:' ~ l _ o
1 i ~JV - _ ~ ~ I I / ;'i Y V1 E%ISTING GRAVEL i I
~ i _ v j ~ } ROAD TO BE REMOVED ~ j~ ~J - o
~ ~ ,'1F ~ ~ I I u~ ~ ~ i ~ I I ~ ~ ~ ~,f ~ ~ 1
I ? /ice ~J ~ / N\ ~ G'., grm~ r <m:og~g
1 R MAT LINE TO I „./.f ~ V1 1 BEIRENDYED~ COORDINATERYITH I ~ 1 I~ E ! ~ { 1 ( SHEET CB.I2 Fqi CONNECTION TO I ~ I , u°1~-u Ica i~'Ew
Iii ,V ~ f p { 1 NEW FIRE WATER P[PE ~ I f"' - • { { X TINC PAYEIENT TO BE i NC PAV ~ BE ~ I ~S'd'i ~i°2o co
I ~ _ _ / i REINDVED FOR REMOVAL DF REMOVED F!OR ~pDj!p ! 1 I I. ! { EXISTING 12' FIRE MATER FOIRUATI~~ C ST}16ET[ON i
I ,i i PIPE REMOVAL AND NEW `IGH [N DUI ! ~ I I ~ ~ ~ ; „ { HSTULATaox ~ i ~ I Z O
I ~ ~ ; ~ - S ~ E%ISTING PAVEMENT i0 BE ri I ~ ~ y ~ REMOVED FOR PROPOSED ~ ~ ~ ~ I cn U
I I A ~ 1 ` FOUN7ATIp1 CONSTRUCTION. I ! 7 i I zz Q
I i'~ ~ Q X z
1 ? .~P ~ I wo
I 3; r ~ I I I~ it ~ 1 1 Tw
1 ~ ~ ~ I _ Q~ I ~o 00
U I 1 _ 1 3 co z w
{ U=
LL
EXIST]NG PAVEMENT TO RE EXISTING PAYFIEIIT i0 BE EXISTING llCH11MG COI~UIT REMOVED FOA INSTALLATION AEIOYEO Fql 116TALLATI01 IO BE AIUOUED OF NEM 12' FIRE WATER PIPE ~ ~ P0.L
LIGHTING CONDUIT
1 ENLARGED DEMOLITION PLJ~N z
CI. i l SCALE 1' 20' Q J
z Iz O
Q i J - i
w0
W
y ~a
o t p c N
W w e 0
L~ u
Ly ~ W o 3 M
° - ~ ~o
Ll C p E o ° • v
35° 00,00" ` tea =
TRUE NORTH 6Z PLAN
NORTH V u* 'cc
SHEET
0 20 40 60 80 10 C1.12
GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET
Copyright © 2004 by Carter & Burgess, Inc.

e _
_ - _ _ I DR78:A :O r~d ~b 1s~~ f~Sr
q C ~ 21544, N ~ ~ N 147 , 43 E 9164.41
91 .41 q GORIER N ~
CORNER E ~/N 21454.18 q CORNER -
E 9091.4 N 21124.27
q OOANER J^ E %10.28 / ~ o ' CORNEA E 9112.413 ti' N 21413.42 H 21364840 RNER
q LINER ~ E 9528.58 t E 10713.57 q ca1rEA , 364.40 713.57
E 9106?361 N 21329. T7 a ~ ~ E %69.65 ~ CORNEA Q CORNER
` ~t N 21274.89 N 2205 ~ E 10771.52 ~N 0771.74 107.8952 E 1
~ E 9460.20 i ~ \ , It CORNER
~ 6008.3 , ~ ~ N 2~1 IN92~90 • ~6 36~9F N 21~16886T oh o E 10828.89 s N 21192.90 _ E 10828.89
't y E 9955.10 b qbi '1h ~"'ti,o` q COA CORNER
'a'' G ARDNOUSE "211 ~ ~ ~ \ E 108 N N 21111.20 E 10886.72
q LORIEA ' - p ~ 526,69, N 21011.97
• •1--It.l PUh1P t1"I CJ I~~Ji T E 10459. /i N 202881 T °C E 10942.53
' - _ _ _ _ - '1f--S ALE ~ 1, - - - • -~RLI ` _
i It CORNER \1 N 20941.94
~ ? t . E 10993.26 W
2881851 ~ \ _ _ _ _ _ _ - - 8 E 6491.35 ~ \ , f i~ \ \ 't t, R CORNER ~w N 20851.40 -
E 11035.78 JJJJJJ ~
P : ~8%.2T i; t CORNER
' ~ ~ -.&CDinER _ 1 TRAILER PARKING { N 20758.08 6 E 11072.01 E;f ~^om~m~ia
E 8540.17 ^ - - X' ~ I. =~F "mou
. , - + is } q CORNER N 20662.62
t " E 11101.68 n
z ff Q CORNER O
~ ~ _ ~ - ' i r Gigs` 1 I E t ( I I I ! I I ! I d: s _ lal I ~ ti ~ _ _ _ _ _ - - = x< t N 20565.84 t' f E 11127.25 CD C)
9Y M~ A ~ z z
' TRAILER PARKING I a t CORNER IL z f, + N 20467.68 X
t ~ i i i i i i i i i i If ~ ~ ~ ~ - I, - - - ~I I I ~i 1 i ~i~-I I- Z tT O E 11146.56 t w
' ; D Y GOQD~ i i i i - ~ _ . f O f, t1 t_ CORNER
a ' Y ~ I ( _ ~ f f I N e. _ N 20368.63 E 11160.78 z
n I r,• ~ I I i I I I E 1 I I I I I Q ' ¢ ~ ~ (CORNER f ~ TRAC I .;:•t - - - - - - - - - - - n_ I ~c7 ~ E N 20334.62 ' ~ ~ ~ , w
a~ E 7913 2'i ~ ~ TMG PAR~C(;',~a ~FllEL! ISLAND i~ I I i I I I d~ I I I 1 i i_i_i i_i_i_i i_ ~ p i fr tt t CORNER 0
_'i-"T-T-I.--TT T TT ~ T ~-1 uJ € . I gpq , , FUELi STiORiAGE l i i i i I I ~ w N 20269.10 J = . t E 11170.40 LL..
4 _.tKCCCURU• ~ - - - - -1 i I I~ T I I Q , 'r• 1 I T I f ' F- ~ Q II f
F 4• '766 3 I I 1 I I I I i I I I I I F = c e CORNER f { N 20169.21 t E E 11175.84
~ ~ ~ ~~~s ~ ~ -•i~ •i i •i. .i I .i. _i. .i ~ •i• •1 i ~ ~ ~ i i
f READY LINE R A E i i i i i i i i i i i i i~- It CORNER D Q
- i; E DY LIN - ~ q CORNEA ~ I • I h I I I I I I I I 1 ' ~ ' N 20069.27 Q E 11180.09 J CL i Q
$ $ ' N 20127 3S \ E 8215, 02 ~ , 1 1 ( I ¦ I I I_ I_ I ! 1 I I ~ ~ - _ v. _ - - - - - - - -
p ~ ~ o~ '~~=------iai('. .v ~ I i i i •i i i ~ i ~ •i i ARE, 00 .t E J ( CORNER O N 19969.27 1 _
49 ,y_ ga w~ m• ~ I _ I I I I I 1 I 1 1- !.a m - ;tt- 3 t - " E 11183.49 C!)
' i i i i i i i i i I i i ~R~.~~~0 or 7y J W _ _ _ _ _ t It CORNER c
~ •r• ~ , 7 'r a i i i i i i i i ' - Z I ~ I I { I I I I I I I _ _ s - ` a+ N 19846.72 uJ
~ I --j-•-i---j-•-~-i-•-~-~-i- - - ~ i--~T---T'-~T T'-'t'"~ « ...~LDRxED'--- ~ - ~ _ - ' ~ Y 1 I , _ > Fr t E 11187.92 19808.'12 - - - ° 0 ~
a I I 3 i I I I I I o e« e o S` II"~ .-:?1419888.82:--- ~ ~ CC I { I I I 1 I 1 ._J_.L. _ _ - - ~ - P 1 - - - - - - - - - i . . i . , u f, ,E-t988S.53 x0881.53 306.74' f _ ~4 10'M
~ Q i i I i I d~~FR~GERA;Tlpl3 t i i I 1 _ ~ II; r-"' ~ri ~ j q CORNER I N 19724.36
~ ~ T ~ ~~~Illl ~ i i j E 11192.34
~ ~ I I I I I 1 1 I I i i I 1 1 I I 1 1 1 e ~ P ~ + 2%, 71 4
a ~ I I ~NE~iGI~ CE~I~TEf§ I I ~tCC~~~6 ` ~<< ~ e Q i i I I I I I 1 i i i i i i i i i , ~ ~ ~ IJ ~ ~ fl III ~ I, N 82°42' 32-E j I It CORNER
3 1 h I I I I I i t 1 I I I I, •I~~~I• .I. ,i. i•I , If gC010E ~1~``"~\\\\d a lu N I%8fi N 19686.70 E 10898.02 Q CORNER
fi~ ii I 1~^. o u ~i'ii~ I I E 108% Z I ~ ul 1 N 19624.37 E 11195.95
~ , ' - ,~tE ~ _.r._~;It ';A~u,SOCIATE ySOCIATE
3 ~ ~ ~ I ' I r ,I ' ..PARKING kRKING y~ o z
z I ~ . I, = : I ~ ' , - m W S ~ u~nn
: TRAILER PARKING ~ ' ' • - I ' ' ~ 1.. 4- 4.. I 9 ~ 1, E I ~ ~ t5, u o C yz
, .1 ~ 5 55 i -5. mLL€o v
r I~ I ~ ~ _..._s ~ I ~ G" u is, ¦ moma~LL
I~( .I =a°a:g 35° 00'00" i' q dot=~~
x ~ c PLAN TRUE NORTH
"''cr NORTH 0
c N 19235.84 I , I ! V uu
a ~ n E 8580.00 ~e ~ ~ ` JJ)lu./J)•rstl AJ fa A63.~ ~ - 1 - ~ Ir---' ~ C
s ~ . , , , _ _ 5
. n~ , , r ~
YA $ ~'T' ' ~ R ~ ~ ~ PARKING COUNT § a DOUNT
• EXISTING NEW TOTAL NEW TOTAL 236 547 c
! aN gLgiNER ASSOCIATE 311 236 547 N 19016.84 NAxDICAPPED 12 - 12 933.33' - 12 56 138 SHEET
~ . N 90°00' 04'W E 9935.88 OOLK DOORS 82 56 138 3 N 3 q La+NE 9- $ ~ i Q N i8~R94 N 16974.94 TRAILER 169 252 421 252 421
i ~ ~ ; E 8959.76 E 9693. D9 REAOY LINE TO -6 64 a H_ n_3~ -6 64 0 100 200 300 400 C2.01 50 107
~ OVERALL -LAYOUT & DIMENSION PLAN TRACTOR 57 SD 107 n~ GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET
C2.Dt SCALE I' 100' ~!eo °=i
$~i~a' Copyright © 2004 by Carter & Burgess,lnc.

S 54°32'44'E
8.61' _ - - _ ~ _ N215~44. - 1 No d~
_ _ _ _ - - - _ _ _ _ _ _ E 9184.41 _ N 21539.45
E 9191.42 I 6a t?~S
CORNER /
N 21412.43 E 9112.41 1
e CORNER N 44°51'S4'N N 21454. 16.88' 1
E 9094 e CORIffR N 21460.18 J i 1
E 9124.32 3iu ~1, N 45°18'fi0'E f2,
25.21' F
R COR1~A $ 44°4 "1 T'E E 9106?361
16.95' h I 2 ~
1 ~ nr I
l~ a CD ! N 21 E t CORNER 1 N 21348.05 E 60.20 i 1
i I iL 3
1 I N
6 t~ 1 4 ~
R
9t 4 y611 y,~b
~0 ~ pd 1 I z t 1
1 1
~om¢ am~
1~ : GUARDHOUSE ~h ~ u~m~umw SE ` iT
P IN <deo
5 Iw IQ Z
. ,
_i t_.. . t------_- O co C) - I1 I. Z Z
, 1 - - 2 a _...~.y _ o (L z
• - ~e_.._-.... _ _______________~a aj X O
n. 1~ p j W W
q ------------------------a ~ -1 a O Z
-----------v a ~ ~ ~ ~ >R ~ , C coRNER b M„_~
R A e ^ . N 209T9.fiJ _
~7 ~ $ 8585.%'. n' o
S ~E E 84911 F'2~0l96~7 $ 6a $ ; E 8yl5y 5 LL i
I ~ ~ $ N q?,g` i t8 d ~ r 49.16 % i i
i a B ~ ~ , -
A ~ ~ er?ORNER~' ~ "N 208T5.7T~ , i
~ E-8540°ki' i' 1 0 J
" ~ , ~ _ - --I a.
Q Z
_ - 1 JO j 1
_ CnJ L
- <
r ~ i i J , ` - --------------j LU1 rr
s¢ a ~ f - <
~ ~ ~ r -
~b ~ , ' -
~ 5 ~ ~ ~ ~ r;• ENCE CORNEfl fE CE_N20419 42-_J IER BOC N 206 1.42
aa e~ E ~ t N 20619.42 3 ~ ~ q5' titi , ~ E 9360.25 5 5 'n 1 A
8 3 s s 03~ ~`1 PI BOC y ~ ~ ~ ~?`0 ~ ~ N 20611.42 A I 2
$ a E 9388.25 .
i 3.11 & ~ S ~ 22 0 ROC S 3.17' I1 11• TO BOC O TYP. 1
i ~ ' i 35° 00'00"
y' Y ~ P ~ { ~ Ei N ! PLAN TRUE NORTH W I20STR PE N 2 I NORTH H 436.4
y y _ ~ E ~ ?sa ~ ~e J ~ " E 9463.25 W o u+ 6
~ ~ t~ ~ / ~ m m 12'R 1 ~Z 11 3
~ ~ ~ u r c We3~ u
w io i W c E
i r p `I L E o~2F~ ° j °'t- 4
~ ~ i ' ,t 3 € r 1 ~ f - v
v 10 4~ i v U tg
8 N 203486 $ ~ i E 1913. Y ~ ~ i a
8' 50' i ~ r ~ i 2 i , ROC TO 50' 251 I u N
8 yy ~ fENCE C 3 ._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._.~._._._.=i_._._._._._._._.~._._._._._.~._~_._._~_._._._._.~._._._.~._._ _.B" ._._.:0 50 too 150 200 C.
MATCH LINE RE C2.13 GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET
~ ~ R ~ ~ LL n 1
~ ~ ~ `V ° o~
da Y y ~d ~_._..s. _._.1 SHEET
m ~ ~ •,E 4 KEY PLAN C2.1J
~~Sx° - UT & DIMENSION PLAN ~ ~_n~ ~ 1 AREA i LAYO i
; C2.11 SCALE I'=50' 3
n s°aip0
-a ~~o`rc Copyright © 2004 by Carter & Burgess, Inc.

1
1
i ~ A CURVE DATI CURVE DATA r,• o' . da . ,~~~S,c
I
LINE TABLE T e=9D°oo'oo' T e=B3°09' 01 A-150.00' O2 R=150.01 '00' 00' O A=83°09' 26' A=83°09' 26' i. 00' T02 R=15000' T03 R=15000'
~ LINE LENOTN BEARING L=235.62' L=21 T. i1 I N 142~.4,2T L7 06.83' S 32' T=150.00' T=133. D! 1.62' L=217..71 L=217..71' 7.00' T=133.08' T=133.08'
I 958'28 RADIUS POINT RADIUS F 59°20'02'0 LB 030.OT 34.58'55.0 N 20794.0000 N 20807. 5 POINT RADIUS POINT RADIUS POINT '94.0000 N 20807.0152 N 20817.1213
I 21.28' LB S 35'17'37°E E %81.41 TO f %91.3 I ~ CORNER Li0 100.05' S 33.51'25'0 PC PC 11.4170 E 9697.9170 E 9714.4170
N 21413.42 E 9528.58 J n RN1.04' S 30.28'24.0 x 20944.0000 N 20955. PC PC X44.0000 N 20955.9467 N 20966.0529 11.4170 E 9715.7887 E 9732.2887
I 1 u2 100.03' S 25.OB'STE E %81,4110 E 9715.1 PT PT
r ~ L13 100.03' S 25'OB'S7^E I! CORNEA Pi PT N 21364.40 N 20794.0000 N 20807, S ~~~0 rl L14 100.81' S 2P U'q"E E 10713.57 E 9831.4170 E 9B4LS '94.0000 N 20807.0153 N 20817.1214 11.4170 E 9847.9170 E 9864.4170
s~~a, n u5 100.03' S fl' 22ur'E
I ~-f N 2~329AT7 18 1011.05' S 14'4724"E ~ E %69.65 L1 10007' S 00•MP17'E Oe=83°09'26' ~e=fi8°IB' r 704 A=150.00' TOS R=50.00' 09'26' O A=68.18:36-
I L18 99.97 S OS•3rN"E f~ L=21 T. 71' L-59.61' T=133.08' T=37.92' 00 ' TOS R=50.00'.TI' L=59.6I' .08' T=33.92'
I \ i \ RADIUS PO[NT RADIUS F S POINT RADIUS POINT
(~1 f CORNER N 20627,2273 N 20911. i ~ N 21271.89 E 9730,9170 E 9933.1 E 10711.52 27.2273 N 20911.2500 0.9170 E 9933.2565 W a ~
r I J / ~ j~ NC20976.1589 NC20892. PC _ 46.1589 N 20892.7709
? I ~ 6' , 7g 3 , ~ E 9748.7889 E 9886, 7 ~ I~ ~~J8.9 ~ ~B PT PT 8.7889 E 9886.7965 N_
IN ~'`;f L E 9880?91704 E 993311 PT 27.2274 N 20861.2500 0.9170 E 9933.2565
iU e CORNEA 92 f CORNER iW N 21168.67 ~ ~ N 21192,90
¢ E 9955.10 c°j ~ D E 10828.89 - o
I Z
IJ ~ ~9
!U ~ ~ IF- Q [CORNER om> a>o>r ate;-3iliW-
I~ 9 E 10866.12
L-^---' _ ?6.60, - - ~ S X300? 07• ~
~ o 0 E ~ COPoER ~ ~ ~ ~ \ N 21AI4.9T Z
E 10159.17 ~ 1... "-"°"'PI S>'RI PE"`_._,_ eEORNER O CORNER U
_ \ N 21028,17 - - _ N 20958.00 E 10942.53 f-%70.23 21028.17 Z Z 10942.53 Q
I____ ENCE CORNER ~d
• 71.2092$. 25 - ` - N 0934,25 FERCECORNFR C _ _ •E 98'(9,6'-•-•---' --C~99%.45 P Ba N 20924:25 ~ XZ U W
a N 20916.25 10730.60 E 101]8.60^,
~ ~ r 0'---------------- 09938.60 ...F~_• X20941.94 R ~ FLUKE x/APRON °u - _ Q CORNER fN 20941.94 N O p
6 I I ~ - _ . _ E 10993.26 d ( I \ ~ `01 r fENCE NER E 10993.26 Z W
~ \ / ~ ? $ I ~ ~ ~ N 2083fi ~ Ita I \ \ TOS r 2 .7 F 10809.31 ~ Ur p
e~ _ i TOI \ \ FENCE CORNER . ? ~ I \ T 0 I I U ~ 'Y 20823./2 PI BOC LL
' J N 10 t ['40030.11 N 20815.12 F3 I 702 \ \ E 10895.76 e ~ ` x`j0823./2 E I t CORNER
_ \ TENCE COAXER ~ 0 N 20851.40 E 11035.78
~ ~ ~ ~ I 1 I B'p TRAILER PARKING ~ t Ba E 10903. T6 R ~ ~ FIRE PhJMP To3 N 20861.25 \ ' $ $ $ I 1 I ~ ~ ; ENO EP G r E 10730.60 g0'p ~ N 208IL92
~ I HOUSE I ~ ~ ~ BECIN BOC pT pa - ~ E 10918.95 Tg4 I i i ~ N 2086125 P' TR N 20861,25 ` f f _ _ _ _ ~ ; E 9933.26 l 5 I PE
~ ~ ~ ~ I ' N'. 20160, T5 ~ E IOT40,TT i ~ ~ E; 10054.20 ° ~ - ` 0 ~ N_ ~ - . PI Ba 30'8 E ' ! FLUTE W/APRON J Z:) < p~
3.54' II' 11' II' 5.55' N 20827.92 ~ "z - E 1080575 , AE:~S/C4.52 I8 / I6 ~ 16 ~ O~ PI STRIPE PI BOC i ~
~ o , ' 'PI STRIPE ~ ~ N 20811.92 - ~ .a I _ N 20760.75 N 20815.12 ~ 'E 14895.76 y~ K_ ~ „ _ . , ,N 20727. T5 E 10675.75 E 10830.11 N 2007 8808 z E 11072.01 O
I ~ ' 'E 931.12 3 I Q T 5 ' N O 1 U.)
i '1 '1 55' 110 55' ~ ' 1i ii i r.'r • r B00TO ~ n < N W
~ I i , ~ _ a 1 F________________ ~ , Q W p
& R S1 ' + ~ ~ ~ ~ N~~~ Ero BOC ~ 4,„ ; I I I I I i I 1 I I I I _ _~~~T0~~1.42 I O' I I I I I I I I ! I I cc
r ~ ~ s I-------------•..-- - E 9§34.42 i ! : ' ~ I I i I I I I I I I I , ~ ° e +r qq _ ~ N 20662:62 Q E 11101.88
$ 8 ---_o.-'=_ i`::=-"---"-_.... --PENCE CORNER - - - - - - - -'--~-i-'---.~ 6 ~ i °'w~" N 2061942 ~ COMPACTOR CURB 1 I I f I 1 _ ~ s 1 ~ I ui E 9823.12 ~ 'RE:IVC8.31 ar:•M;a i ~ Rr ~ 1 ! 1 I I I I I I I I I edN.
1 ' ~ 1 xx 1x1 • I.._ mm4_...a .EEHCE.O 419.92.._ ~ I i I I - - ~ ~ ~ X20574.94 8 8 OC N 20611.42 ~ 1 I I I I < 'v
~.J - ' ~ E 10895.76 I I I ( I I 1 I I I I I I ~ 0 Y x Y I - -_._L_._._._._._._.-'-'-'"-'-'-'-'-'-'-.-.-._._----'-.-.-.... .i.?-i---- 5 _ X20574.94
- I I it I I I I I I i 1 I I O E 10923.69 ~ ~ € ~ i 0 3 3 ~ i I I I i i I ! i 1 I ~~T ° - e CORNER
~ ' ~ I I i I I I I I I I ~~..`i„_~ N 20565.84 E II12T.25
$ ~ ~ I i I I I 1 1 I I r-w pE~5/C4~52~ I to TRAILER A N II' i - - - - - g5. ~ g,: N
P RKI G I I I DR$ GOODS 1 I I I I DT` Bo a ~ ~ I I I I I I I I I 1 I 16 ONCE ' 35° 00'00"
~ ~ ~ s i A~iEA A~ ' ' I i I I I I I 1 i I I 9 PLAN TRUE NORTH y w»
$ $ I O COIMEF I '_/_._.L_ _.L._._.J._--•-'1-.---. _._i_._._.-.-•-'-l-'-'-' - ~'-.-._.L. ' ~ N 10167. r ~ E 11146 q~ g_ 15.08 m; ~ I ! I I 1 I I I 1 i 1 I t CORNER NORTH o z N 20467.68 E 11146.56
i 26 TRACTOR PARKING i i i i i - ~ PI STRIPE 0 vpnm o C 8A ~
N 20436,42 y~u ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Z n E 9831.42 ~ - :gt", I' i I i i f I I I I 1 I I I ~ r o mc3a
I 115' ~I~' . -j - - -1- - --I'---'-'~-'-'-- (r I ~ i I ! i i i i i i i i I Q ~ ~szLL N ~ E .vi
i , ~ ~ ' o, ~ „ , N 20CORNER .63 d o a p y
~i COMPACTOR CURB 1 ~ ~ ~ E III ~ ~ I ^ ~ ~ ' ~rffSllCCfl~3~ I . _:_._._.I . ~ ll.l ~ ' ` N 20345.53 L '-r:-,~-f rL._.__.--,~,_.----i-'-~-'-i~---'-'r-'-'-"1~-~-'-4-'-~-' , i- -'-'-I~-'-•-•I-'-'-' 10 E 10895'76 -__-E 11160.78 g c Ud~ m
~ 3 100' 4 3"~' ` I I I i ! ! 1 I I - : N 20745,53 _ 42 'o
w I ~ Q E I Og28.2B 4 y~~ I I I I I I I I I ~ - i wl O ' r V U %
y ~--•.-s~ ; 1 I I I I I i 1 i I ~ ~ ---I---1----~'-_..._ ~._--I----i-----I'----7----~----~ _u_T- -f t- - ~ ~ "'t~uME'r/AP 00 a N
0 50 100 150 200 rn N
`9 ^ ~ "u~ MATCH LINE RED C2.14 GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET C N
~ ~ 4= ~ ;m s C1 n 1 c
6N
~~SSj ~ ~ y ~ ` I - i z
$ $ 3 SNEET o 4
~ r ^ _ ~ 1 AREA 2 LAYOUT & DIMENSION PLAN ~ u KEY PLAN `o
n~ a C2.12 SCALE: i'=50' C2.12 i
~bno (;;a #io¢ 3 i
Copyright © 2004 by Carter & Burgess, Inc.

•~o,MU.wyy,W
MATCH LINE RED C2.11 _ caANER - -25` - - N 20249.4z _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - - - hoc ro
_ ~ _ _ E 9380.25 FENCE - _ ~ NCE - _ I W 'A II 1 ys t'c,
~ _ ' 1
3 k ~ 1 I
~ ' , N S J66 i 1
So '/p, ' I ~ ~ , f I OS ~ ~ 1 r 1
. ~ ~ ~ . • ~ ~ ( I 1
, ~ ~ ~ ~ 4 ~ PI STAIPE 10'R READY LINE I1 N 20241.42 12 R - j 10'R 11' 12' R
~ ~ ~ ~ E 9388.25 PI STAIPE , ~ ~ , . r ~ w i I PI STRIPE
, - ~ o N 2011142 i E 9463.25- N 20171.42 1 E 9463.25 i
' ARKING TRAILER P 1
. , i , R CORNER , 1
E 8215025 1 ~O ? 1 ~ 13 ( I ~','J; t ~ f i
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ • r { 4 'SW '1l',~------•----- „ ~ ~ E j ~ ~ ~ I~i ,
1 . ~ 1 i ~ i ` } i NN°I ~ S , ~I i r ! c r 1 d ~
B~ ' A~: i I ~ I <,1t _ I
1t 1 ~ F.tElS}iAig.E ~ ! 1 -
I i , i i areis~~c II ! , ' ;FIRE ~sER R00~1 iris' I H ~ ER ROOM i
I ~ ~ 1 1 o -tow ' i
OOM ' ' I FIRE', RISER; R ~ ~ i
~ I. I 1 i I . - ~ ~ i i ! ! 1
o: m z ~ i I >c'Y
~ ~ , i ~ i i 1
i I I i I I
i ~ _._._a- -~-•-1--- 1 ~ ~ Z ~ I i 1 1 1 I ~ ~ - 1 i ! N ~~r 1 (J
~ ~ ~ I F'~ R _ Rr_FRIGE~ATION.._.~°F1n~~. - Aa;s • Z W O
~ Q ._._._~_,_.g~~~c._ i 1 I~ d AREA; B I ' i
1 ! I _ f _.___i_._._._i_._._._~_._._. - 1 - - - -_.~.1 ._.!w Z cn U Z Z i 1J Q
w i i ; 1 j z 1 F- IQ " X O
1 ~ ' I 4~ i ~ I 1 -I - ~ ~ - - - _ s y 1 ' N ~ w
I Ez
I ~ I ~ i ~ ~ i
' ' I ENERGY CE T R S h__i 3, m w i ! I =
R a ~ ~ I I 11 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ I I s I ' J I t-fw~r~ ~i O
R s I ( ~i~s o ~ J I { 1(
x~~ ~ ' 1 I I- - - n 1
~ 6 {4a 6 f ~ f ~ r 1
t
~ ~ d j y
I ~ Q j 0-j
~ ~ ~ $ sm. ~ , I Q
' I I JZ O
~ x 6 I 1 I cn 1 CO Z
TRAILER PARKIN : ~ 1 j W
~ ~ ~ I I I ~ ~ 9 ¢ 1 wM
I ~ yy 1 I~ E 1 ~ t 1 s ~ 1 Q~
9 1 ~ , ~ , € 1 1
~ i b h k 1,
w R 1 P n a~ 1 , 1, ______________1 ~ 11 ' fl , 1 R ^ , _y- -----LLJ
~8 . L1
--_---.-----J
~ ~ ~ ' n
e ~ 3 ~ ~ 1 1 i
3 i 3 ~ ~ ~ ~ , 1 35° 00'00"
~ s s ~ ~ € § , - - mss PLAN TRUE NORTH y
- NORTH
~ ~ ~ x x R CORNER ~ ~ 'C &
~ N 19235.84 ~g ~ E 8580.00 ~ a -----.-_____-----_6_-.- 1 ~"€m .
s ` , y ~ Y.. Y.. , _a - - - m^+1a;g c
~ 1 , ~ ~ - ~ 1 - o-C
? ~5,6~~, 5 11 0~ ~ ~
R ~ Jo ~ x 8 ~ ~ Jp J). •1 0 0 V < UV o %
pt ~ ~ 6 I ~ C
~X'~ § ~ ~ ~ ' .0 50 100 150 200
5 4 ~ N j GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET
i ~ $ 0 i3 ~ °i i Y ~ ~
9 @ " ~ e CORNEA 'j : ~ N 18914, 91 933.33' 933.33'
9 ~ a. ~ E 8959.76 ~ ~ R ~''s $ d ~ ~ ;m ° N 90°00'00'M N 90°00'00•M 1 I c
R on am SHEET
~ KEY PLAN ~ C2.13
fr ~ ~ '-'_ra 3
~ ~ = a -LAYOUT & DIMENSION PLAN a ; ~ ~ . i AREA 3 C2.13 SCALE 1'=50' 4. 4~Y~U
y ~O V 2 ~ 1 Copyright © 2004 oy Carter & Burgess, Inc.
gn^ ~_b0 y[.;~Ca
ll~K

- ~ * a BENCH MARKS=
R , ~ N 21102.21 ;o_-..•iw E 9622.15
~ C NERRD~ 11544' 44 ~ S c N/ IlTj:43 E 9164.4 ` ELEVATION 488.78 rs w _fi W rA ~ a:
6 91 .41 ~ ~ l CORNER + ` R ~ i' N 2. TBM -CAP 9. IRON ROD WITH CAP ':a'a E: Sr N 20977.38 .'r~•r E 10436.94 .,r
~ ~ ~ COMER Ei t ~ ~ J'N 214S1.T~ 1 ~ 7 , E 9091, C R ELEVATION 490.84
b N 2142/.'27-. I ~ ~ s , t ~ E 9510.28 3. TBM - CAP 11, 5i9• IRON ROD WITH CAP N 20222.19
~g ~ N 2/lT~2A/3 ~ o ~ CORNER '7 ~ $ ~ E 9112.41 ` i ti' N 2NI3.42 , f COMER E 11115.25 ELEVATION 477.97
y > ? ~ E %28.SB _ N 21364.40 ~ .t CORNA ~ I ~CpINE _ E 10713.57 ~ NQI442.T1, f ,`,2 N 213297 , D BM*I BENCHMARK INFORMATION FROM SURVEY T AT NCGS MONUMENT 'VANCO•
.8 ~ ~ E X06.36 ~ q E 9664.65 ~ ~ ~ ' ' 1~ v RLOIiNEA N 23021.07, E 11203.26 ' CORNER ELEVATION 513.07
R ` I ' ~ GORIER ' J N 212Tq, 89 1 • - t ,N 21348.05 / ~ r t E 1077152 121274.89 10771.52
i 1,' r ~ E.9K0.20 / 3 ,
t S .Jg i / - , I CORNER ~ y Y ~ i „ _ _ ~ 6Aa3 •TO• ~ N 2I 192.90 ~ ~ 1 6• CORNER $ 8 ~ 0 ~ _ P , i ~ I y~(i i N 21168,67 ,4, E 10828.89 e CORNER / N 21192.90 E 10828.89
1 ~ ~'`1yy` ~ _r, 1 / / 6 E9955.70 .o`~,yo ~ jy~ it g7~+- ~7 .~i ,'q,• ,
~ ` 1 ' I ,o~` ~ e CORNEA ' .a°' RDHOUSE ~ I f ~ N znn.za i V \ It CORNER N 21111.20 E 10886.72
2 1 1 E E . 2 1r _ f CORNER / ' ~ , t' - 526 --•J N21014.97 ' CD
4 ~ ~ - F1FLE--RUMP, I-fOUS~ - E 10459.47 ~ i R 'r _ _ ---7`----....~,, ~_.-.-.--._______-___:-'mom - ~•~~~ay ~~r .E, _fir 4 \ E 10 CORNER N 21028.17
eCORNEA,r r r?''. `..--."s I"'.,"-z`°_--:r~_--°-__ - _ r~,Cl'71iL'et~=c~S.AL~i'i_~-~ ?r: - - ° . N209T0'61 .t .7...-..~r'f'........_. - _ - +Et~ / v~I~ E 10942.53
t^ ~ E 8585. % ~ _ :,-r'" r _ r - _ _ t'' i 1 R ~ a ~ _ _ ! ~ 1 - _ ff 1 N 2COR 0941.94
. ~ , ' ~ t - _ g ORNEA - - E 10993.26
E 849135 f ~ : ` a It CORNER °
, , I ~ ~ r 1 ~ t _ ~ • ' ~ I ~ ~1~' I t ' ~ ~ ~ .A P ffOANER 1 fb.7~ I ~ ( I! ~~P ~ ~ N 20851.40 _ E 11035.18
P a ~ , y .
CO's - x _ _ ~-L _3- s- 1 , i; ~ ` lv • r'• b _ F ~ fi :N 20fii5-iF=^ ~ ~ a~. ~t''~~ ~~1111C1~ r~pK.. - - R CORNER N 20758.08 >
R ~ ~ ~ z f - -^°"'-'~~-rx._"- _ - , ti .r:.'p' _ - ' -`.Z ~ iA, it " _ • .,fi;3, E 11072.01 ~ em.J.rmuo~
- - _ •,1~1 its' I~~ _ I•. 1 I ~ 4 I d ! v 1 ~1S A It CORNER
_ 7 . _ - I ~4" N 20662.62 E 11101.88
~i ~ ~ ~ _ _ _ _ i ~ - - ' _d.-.
~ d d e h~' ~ ~ - - I,' 1 A ' I I ~ f t I I r! I ' € ( "'t'~ Q CORNER O ° N 20565.84 _ E 11127.25 U) U
.'~yL Ha y'~ / 1p0°~ 'lilt / I ~ i IY ~L.-.-._ - - _ _ _~-.-....I.- _ i._ - _.4 ._k I j r ~l 1 1/ v I I ;~~'.I i E~ 1~ ~ I I i 1! I- E~ I t ,,"',1" t' a ~ , q : ZZ
,l. TRAILER.=P~4 ~ ;;1~ I i ~ 1 I- I~ 1' I ~ i ~~i I _ L Q \ \ - \ Q CORNER Z
; i i i i 1; i~; I I N 20467.68 J. X E 11146.56 O > D; LLI fJ~
>F i , 1~ ,~~~i I I I i~ ~ ~ f~ 1 I i I,'~ :--,w
- CORNER uJ N 20368.63
b ~ LOANER _t ~ I -~''i I ~ g~ / _ a FF ;EL.; 80.65 , Q . N 20334.87 ~ ~ ~ _ E 7913. 4 .-i,-. -!."-_.,-'-~-'---r i 11 . ' i i E 11160.78 Z LLI
I[ , 1 1 i ~ TMG PARKING ~ ,I~EL 'LSLAND~, ; ~ ' ~ _ ' 1. ` P ~ CORNER
FUEL ST AGE`v I,' t ~ ' N 20269 Q .10
G c NS ss ~ ~ P ` ' , ~ 'ii4
i` d~ d SJ'/p t f 1 j 1a 1 ~1 "'6 i 1. f I i I i I I; f L t 3 - - ~S _r' ~a a, a P ~ ~ I ~ i i; ll', I ~ t ~ 1 ,'1~ I ~.a.~ l, + IL CORNER N 20169.21
R Rte' R ~ - ) ~I. rrti i - tY-.. v' /1. ~ ~ , E 11 175.84 Z
{ ~ ~ ~ READY LINE ~ 'i i - -i ~ ~ i 6: CORNER
~ ' . - ' K ~ N 20i2T,3S- ''..:i . ' 1 I~. II i i' r~ I 1. i ",i? N 20069.27 E 111 O 80.09
~r E 8215.02 m ~ _ 07~ '
1_ s • I t ~ •;i,, + ~ , m, ~ ` I rlr 1+ a CORNER Q N 19969.27
E= I_. I i I i~ ~ r ( _ - , . , t ~ - ti , e t - ~ ~ I I I ~ 1 s l i i l I I 1 11 _ q v. E 11183.49 (!j
_ _ _ ' „',~`~I ~ i i I i i i i i i i L: 4~0. ~ o ' b ;
t CORNER J N 19846.72 J
~ a , E 11187.92 Q
•i ~ I I I I 1 I I i t I I I I a "P4~q~^` ,'.-N~{~eB~eT- r ~ 6 r 1 ~ t7. Q - ~ - - - G - - - - I~- - - ~'~t ~;r~ , _ E I089~;y1:'`aT~ - 306.7 n ~ _ ...d 1 1 I- EFR ~ TIOf~ _ ~ - ;i~~1~2 `;t 1' '~i 306.74'_ LLJ
~ x I.I'~; 5% I 1 1 ~ I I -l 7 I 1 n ,a' I~~WG ; .I, ' S 82°aq• 10'W` I s \ ~q Q CORNER O \ s " N 19724.36
E 11192.34
°r~ J - I 1 I I 1 I I I 1 1 I I I ' e ,e o o i t5ii', 'I~ , 7 ! ? ~ / - - - - - - ~ 1 ,t - !`~I~ ~ ~ r~\ ' ~ 296 ~ Q ~NEAGY C~(~TE ~~r~.- ~ ~~4 '1 ~ - ~ 296.71
~ ~ t ''i'. ~ ? I I I I ! I 1 ~ I _ 1 I [ e~ 'o e a '~,li ~ ' 1 tt-82° 3 3 3 ~ a_f ~ - -i , I I _ i , I 1 rr• q i ~;,r„ . i 4-82°42' }?"E
R h,l, i ~ ~ ,R ORNEA . , ~ p 4 i / i A t ki ~ v N I%86.70 ; , / Imo; - ~ _ , , v ~ I \ R CORNER \ N 19686.70
11 _ ~ ' ~ ` ~ _ t E,10898.92 \ E, 0898. 02 R CORNER \ N 19624.37
'°e _ _ , 6 'i i. ~ I - - - - - v E 11195.95
_ , NG
~4 ~a " I ~ - AKING . , ' _ TRAIL ' ' , B c
• ` ~ 1 J 1 - , "Y' - - i ' I i11 I, 1 _ ~ ~r,l(~E I ~ - ~ - - a' L ~ M RE c o R r w a ° > 0 9 ° C Yl ~ F r
dr' ~ ~ ~ ~ / ~ ~ 6A r~~ _ - - ~ - - 5 EL a 4 to m ' `e e`0 3m
- , ° t - _ _ fir'- ~ - E mma~ ® m
r 1;. ~ - _ _ _ ,'+'x. , may,- - - - - - ' r . . 4j } r ~ - - - . ----~-s- _ ,i - - - $ c pylaY 16 35° 00' 00" ° m
n ~ ~ PLAN TRUE NORTH s v~^
x ~ i' ~ , ' , - ' I - NORTH
I: gr ~ N 19235.84 . a - - _ ~ ~ , I \ ~ H ~ E 8580.00 , 1 ~ ' ~r,i - S f ~ ' ; ~ ~ c ' UV V
r ,,,r, _s~tsu rursarrsr• 1 ~I~ + , , t o t - ~ '
_ N 960 . riy~,r ~ ~ o-~ r ~99. 5S•`d
d dgot SSa 'J4, ,,p...... xtSEN' ~.T r °t5 R J r? ~ / II~~~31 1 _ - Yr'~ i ~g4
d ~ 'Q ,C., c 4.. /r,' 9 ~ o~ a _ ~ .fib ,~.+d_ ,.,?.~i~... s.
J{. - -rte nY•... f ti & ' i°y ~ ~1 ~ ~ 'CORNER
~ ~ r' ^ _ _ 93.33=1 ~ _ ~ _ ° ,N 19016.84 ~ r ~ - N 9O°86' 00'W~'- - / r ' E 9935.58
~ _ ' CORNEA. U' f CORNER ns s'"' ~ , d - N I B9T4.94 ~ ~ ~ N 18974.91 SHEET
' = ~ 'e E 8959.76 E 9893.09 M h_ M_~~ ` 0 100 200 300 400 C3.01
u i OVERALL -GRADING PLAN a ;~„o C3.01 SCALE: I' 100' GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET
sa°~ ~;tea
ss°'.~¢ Copyright © 2004 by Carter & Burgess,Inc.

S 54°32~~44'E BENCH MARKS: It
6.61 _ - c Z._.. -TBM-..-.6AP4r- ROO WIT4-CAR . ``1 N 21102.21
_ _ E' 9194: 41 ~ - j N 21539.45 _ j E 9622.15 w z: ELEVATION 488.78 W N ^
E 9191.42} ~ 4 2. TBM - CAP 9. 4' IRON ROD WITH CAP •'~da t?~<'~; 1 N 20977.38 ",p'1,.•'
t • OANER , ! r~.~ E 10436.94 1 ELEVATION 490.84
N 2NT2,43 ~ 11 ~ A E 9117c 41, ~ 1 3. TBM -CAP 11. 4' IRON ROD WITH CAP
AS qCOApEW' N 44°34'S4'M d z1154 I6.8R' p N 20222.19 E 11115.25 1 ELEVATION 477.97
E,90~4 2 e CORNER • ~6 N 21460.4d~• . 1 BM°I BENCHMARK INFORMATION FROM SURVEY
E 9124.32 1foJ1, . N 45°IA'60'E•• AT NCGS MONUMENT 'VANCO' N 23021.07, E 11203.26 ELEVATION 513.07
25.21' F; i fl
~ CWiNER S 44°45'11'E ZZU42~761 I 1 7ti
~ ]6.55, E 9106 ~ I ~ ' p
~ ~ J 1 ~ ~ ~ ;
_ I~ - ~ ~ - , f ca+NER - I
e ~ 11 ~ E 2160.20 e CORNER r 1 N 221348.051 ;
' ` i'
' 3 460.20
1 t ~ 1' r 1
, / i' r ~ r ~ r r ~7 ~
R R R ' 7 ~ a r~°_} 1 l 1
gg ~ h1o ~y4 t ~ r / €>e , J
~ ~ ~ ~ + i~ ~ i ,r,r,,, ~ ' i' ` i , \ 1 Zo .N N02
i \ 1 om2Y ~22 e~ 1 ~ mt~212 p6p
1 l ~ b ` HOUSE , r i } GUARD
~ I F~ ~,L . 4 ~ ,..2 . ~ ~ ~ ~ G, I s ss,l _ IU
% ! ~ - 485 1.7 I ~ -
®p __1W O
3 ~ 2~ - --ice o ~U
~ ZZ U 0- zf
--°IQ X O
W (n w
~ , .J JZ__a~ ~ / _ ° --1 O 0
1 „ ~ r _ n ~ p 3 ~t 3 CID Z w
~ eca~R B72z R 4 ~ c n 2097y,67 pp ? a r j U F
~1 1 ~t ~ ~ ~ 8 ~I 'p a7 - n p C a„ p CORNER G h6~ I D 1 1 I.1..
A 20881. ~ = qr„ i j
$ 4~ fi E 6491 ~ '9 ' Ss 4A1 ~ € ~ , _ 49 ~ ~ 1 d ~I a'~ 1
g + .'S 83.15"E 4J h, , / ~ / d c c 2 , Z
S d d - ' n 5.7T~~ 475 a
~ ~ ar a 40,
4 • -..a-.-__. - - til z
A79 46~ L- - .1 D
Q 1
M.- 4- 4~ / - - -0 TOM EL..463 -
_ _ _ - - - - _ ___-_s..- oar _ ----------_-467-_____~I - - - - - - _ 1 r
7 LLI
~ 3 R R - - - - -fit" J 1 Q -----------1
/ _
- ~ - - 465 - - - ~
s 0 4, gt gi ~ ti„ 7• 1 1 469.50 F 4690; 80 , Q IIIER 1
4 5 6 ! ~0iyti ~ ~ / ~ b s ~ f o"> .1 4r" J V ~ ~ ~ Y Y Y A~0 ~ ~ ~ '
Y 1 ~ ' /
, / ~ ~ i ~ ~ ~ ~ l / o ' 35° 00'00"
$ § ~ ~ i ' n ~ ~ ~ a~° ~ jj 7 ?t ~ o i \ ~ ~ PLAN TRUE NORTH
i ~ , ~ / I!'. f ~ u 411 J / io~ u• ~ ~ q7` 1 NORTH N z O
:~~,,,i, Cv - ~ ~ f W O V a ~ n 1 -Q~ ~ CN C m ° C ~ n °
~a r i ~ ~ i i - EX EP,•""- S" -j o N 8 r 471.8 8• ' _ 'c m € m
!a 411. ~ ~ ~ i 6 ~
~ ~ ,rt ; ` ~1 ~ ~ oell° og ~ e ° me cR
' - v ! ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ , - 1ti l t ~ ~ ~ TC 472.58 , atti 1 set 'z rv
1 ~ ~ - o ~ ~ li •fL 472.08 -r ~ ~ s~ ~ V( ~I i ~ ~ 4Jo - mss. 1 co _
R S ~ ~ is ~ ~ 1~t~ m i ~r'. i 0- j V o `o
n g e CORNER - ' 41 ' ` lI-'j! MATCH EXISTING ~ ~ N 20334.6 ~ ~ + i ~ _ S E T913.2~Y ~ ~`/tea r EOCE OF PAYING 'li f+ ! ~ ?1~
~ > ~ _ _ t~ ,k _ ~ _ ~ y J ~j+'+ ~ ~ m _ 10 50 100 150 200
~ xx ~ t jl ~ a GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET
E ~ . MATCH LINE RED C3.13
3 ~ ~ u~ R
~ ~ ~ § i'n $ 0 1 j
~n s~ y ~ e SHEET
M ti $ '1 'S ' o KEY PLAN C3.11
° - NG PLAN ~ 1 AREA 1 GRADI
""'d ~ C3.11 SCALE: 1'=50' _
r~ ed
~_,°O f~;'% 3~Oa Copyright © 2004 by Carter & BUrgeSS,Inc.

I
. _ I _ _ BENCH MARKS
CAP N 21 102.21 : o Cd E %22. 15
i i ELEVATION 488.78 t~ a ~c N ^ v:
~ h i 2. TBM -CAP 9, 5A' IRON ROD WITH CAP .01 d t; S • N 20977.38 ya
LINE TABLE ~ i E 10436.94 ,y 4>• ' ELEVATION 490.84
,t C R LINE LENGTH REARING i5~ I . 3. TBM - CAP 11, 518• IRON ROD WITH CAP N 20222.19
~8 E 51042AT L7 106.63' S 32'S4'S9'E 7 I ~ 5 59°20' 02'E Le 1W.07' S 3a'S8'S5'E E 11.1 5.25 ELEVATION 477.97
' ~ f,1.26' Le 100.09' S 35'1?3TE ~i I , q COMER L10 100.05' 33'S4'25"E BM*I BENCHMARK INFORMATION FROM SURVEY AT NCGS MONUMENT 'VANCO'
c~ ~s N 21413.41 S y E 9528.58 L11 80.04' S 30'2B'21'E ti N 23021.07, E 11203.26 ELEVATION 513.07
L12 100.03' S 25'085T'E _
~ I u3 100.03' S 25.OB'STE q CORNER ~ / N 21364.40 I ~ 6~ L14 q0.q' S 2P73'q"E E 10713.57 Op,
~ ~ u5 100.03' S n•22'arE , L4 ~ CORNER ~
~ f N 21329.71 L18 100.05' S 14Y124'E a` ~ ~ t_4 E %69.65 _ L1J 100.07' 7
a _ - _ 508.10'17"E I u8 99.99' S05'3Fi4'E - t 1,
I / t / 7 ~ I' ~n { 1 \
/ _ _ _ I _ _ . _ _ d? g coRNER t''•~' / - N 21274.89 tis
_ , I - '-'-.'__r. E 10771.52 - 1 / X
R a ~ / J6''9. 4
1 9 ~ 1 ~R ~ I / \
g q cRRNER - o
35 I / ~ N 21168 ' 7 Y N 21192.90 ~ E 9955.70 / - 'oy ~ E 10826.89
ti k ~ I ' i - ~ti' e° ~
! ~ l ~ ~ t 1 1y o-`'~ I i ?
74 ~ ~ R 4 _ - l I / \ r~ 1 t ~ ~ ! / ~ v R ~ n , . mW:W
~ l7 ! 7o I q CORNER N 21111.20 ' ' 9 E 10886.72 i~2o.e ~,e °lo oe
F ----------.."w___.__________. + ILITY+EASEXENT ,.5 9'~ 50' UTILITY EASEtENT '
~ ~ ~ ~ - X2'1004, T2 ~ • -~yj:E a~==~ i ~ 5.. ~i _ _ - - - W'----- - - - `E~9TL42 'i q CORNER / ~y ~ ; 3S o z
~ F: ZC_-~~ - -4--- 'x•2o938a6..~ -20964. -N^21003.41 X21014.91 1 ~ , . Q 2699'0,. I f9964.36_-_.~• ~ , ~ \ \ 'SJ$t23d8~" E 0459:4 'r \ \ N-209I4:2S BERM ---------T--•---- , -"E"'3?M.,- N-20436.85...' _
s. i_ w_ w_ JI' - - 7•- L_ N 20956:87 ~ -1~ r ! , ~ \ CORNER Ih=,~._~.-'_ "-8:209 2.6 °'-E`99]B'F$0: - _ - '-F.:9994r!5- 48 0 ~ _ / ~ ~c q -E-990L99:' - _ _ --~-?p957;2~_, =~"JQI33.10 ~ ~ ~,.~1. / \ N 21028.17 0 - - - _E-Id0~5J.3R: - :N.2FOA0:46 iN2099Q.41 \ ' E 10942.53 CNE 21OR028RIT Z z 10942.53
- - .E-tD14i•y-72- F~F021L~2 \ .Jf• - „ 1' t Q X_20%9 "ff - yr - _ _ - ~r---- _ °•E 9864.2 - - N 2A934_25e; \ ~ \ Q (L Z
- _ - - - - - - 20930.1 ~ -
~ ~ "--w- - - IF - ~ Il' ~ 114.25 -N 20934.25V~~' ~ I ~pV 20926.93 o F~ - ,2093~'.ES $D 'E 10756.fi4 n , ~ ~ ~ ~ H 2O95J,~1~ _ 475 ..M._---• f.L933QJ1_-'. ~~!18542.84 E 10730.60' 1 p 20918:86 ~ \ w O oC 1 W T w
h R 4----•.,. - 76..99 °-41870.92 ~ f t~ - - - - - " _ ~ E'1,0758.81 1.' q CORNER 8 - s 0.85% _ - _ - g t t 20941.94 ytrn Q o
~ n GRA ~ 1.1/% _ _ ~ - - ' N 20941.94 ~a ~y; I 1. ` ~ ~30Q 7 - - E 10993.26 , _ _ _ - - E 10993.26 CD Z
~ I , '8 t ,t \ 74.1 y' 0.94'f, 9r ~ w U=
$ §a ~ I ' ~ d ~ , t I~f , S 0 r + t l \ ' 4 3.9 C 47 , 8 6 .175J50 ~ C , 75. ,~1 1 i°,, ~y € i ( . - 4 4 A 4 3. 3` 00 A F P 7N.' 1. i 1 ~ ~ ~ 0 LL
t 6 ~ ~ I { / \ 'N 0916.25 4 44 T ' 5 ~ f ~ ti l2 TC. \
.e _ / d ~ r _ Rl i@.BB 5 4P3 94 ~ `~i. i I 1 I I~ ~ 1 4 1, , 7 sz L , ,r~ '1+ 29gil.e ' c h, f 4 I ~ q - E\J9 9211 f' 1 a rE 'ui i ,'tit E,10912.56 N 2 , 51.8 \ 12.56 N CORNER N 20851.40
. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ - - _ - _~_~~~~~u. N Zoe '.B2! 474.so Tc 474 ~A.. ER PARKIN t N ~e 4;Tn T ~,w zoe2T.ze E I - i 47 B7 , 477.15 ' t=_-__--_~"~-'- ~ , f 991 ` 0 A74j51 474.00 FL ',V'>` 0.5 ~ o, :'E 10909.33 pX t h~ 472.65 i . 27.28 ` E 11035.78 '9.33 z 20.37 Q
- ~ ~-'~C ~ t IEXV~P { i,l,nr t'~ " i , N jOB20,31 , 4--`- - - _ _.---~tJtJe7G,;• ~ 1 0,50X O.SOY. i, ~ , 0.50% ,1. 10918.78 ~ E - w~ _ ,c' `S'•~. ~~.fit~77`~ '~T; E fP F HP v TC ~12i:T8 ` ' OX r 18.78 J
°t~4„ a, 49 rv ' 4T .T4 1 l , 47 ~ t - - - ~ - - ^,,,,,a•,\l 1,~8% t ~ /7 3 FF14121 1. 472.46 i r
- ~O _ 43,~26~ L~ 475 t 4 ~n ~Fi iil.%, 'ice 4'S ~ ~ I ~ `C,` I' '.n ''i V',~ , 1 w: E n ~°m` 410.43 FL - 4-5 \ 0 FL t \ Z
! ~ I.- -_X4TC1hEX15$INC.l"~',~+ I .,/D ,ly o 1 q5 V,` i°i ' N. 4., ti_ K. ^ ,~l \~,t,, I I. .,p V 1 C:. ~Y 4\L\ _ ~~EOQE OF..PAi~ONC .s" j I ~ , ~ \,.l` _ _ _ N CORNER 20T58.08 E 11072.01 Q
~;1~ ~ ~ ~F 1 1 ~ ,
I , ~ , _ i -,~,,rr1, :11" 469 TP `IK, .v. ~ , i 0 1
t_ f i 7.4 P f I `try? ~ti ~ , , ; J 1 . , , ~ ~ 476 48 ' , ' ~ I 11 . , ~ . , ~ ~ 1 R+ , I f , , ~ I , , ~ p--.. i i '480.6 TP _ ~I,OY. ~t?~, 1 , i e ~ CV
~ >r I - _ / rjli F, 1 ~ ~ 4. I I I 1I I ~ I .I I ~ I I - 1 i+,t I , _ FOIi GNAD[NC IN • I~ ~ i ~ `q ~ ~ ~ A _ I
n ~ R _ _ - _ - - - - - _ _ / u, , i l I 47698 TP COAP,lCiOA AREA I I I 11 I ( I ~ i I I ` ' TC 4,11 ti's \ t _ 7 ~ f=,-- i _ ~ - - 7 RE~'II/C8.31 + ` ' ;i E ' FL 417.67 f j , \ t CORNER Q N 20662.62 w E 11101.88
a' ~ ~ - _ % ~LBB% I 1 I 1 11 i 11 I i 1 ~I - - f -r- 't 1" , i~ i°, A _ _ Q
- - _ I' ; i• , , erg ~~l , ; '
- - i _ _ ( .021 0 `T 4R3 7 _ _ _ _ { ~ Y Y Y I~ + ~ 69.5'll ~ I ~ ~ - r - 1 ( 1 1 I ~ FL LP 475 475
~ e lit' CL w1 ~ ~.'F432E ~ i I I i i I I I I I t v ,i - 3 ;.'1' ~ " e i 1.4Y. `,,.1 ,'2. % 469:24 ° L` 1 .241 ~ 1
~ ~ ~ ~ r ; 7p ~ ~ o ~ ~ i, ' ~ 1 I 1 I ~ 1 1 i i i i ! i y C a ~ 2•-0% ~`1NA7CH EXISTING f ~ r• ~ f ~ 1 ~ 1 ~ ( , I' 1 I I I t § ~ ~ I ~ 1,~ ,EBCE,OPkAVING I I I I 'I I I 1, d,'.'t R CORNER N 20565.84 E 11127.25
i'~ I I i i I I 1 1 I ` I Ir r` I ' 1' ~.v _ ~,7TR R... ARKIN - - - - - -
_ ~ ~ 1 i F I i i DRIB G ODS i I I - i ' v ~ I 1 Q Q - - ~:,;r r 35° 00,00"
~ ~ - ~i,' I ~ i i i i ~ t 1 i i i - ~ ~ ~,hl 47 AREA A ~ '„1 I - ! . , ~ ~ 'i 1 I i a I ~ i 1 1 I i 1 ~4'- PLAN TRUE NORTH y
~4 ~a I RIRGE ; la ;1, r ~ - - - 1 ~ ' '~'.~,E ri n ~ 472.20 ' x_.__.L._--._i _ J--.-, FF_ EL. 484.65 ~ - FL 4n. I~ i!.coR q tv~ - R[OGE X~EP 1.39~L.' 'T-~ , - ~ _ Oit M. 4,. 4. i. o t t.CDR6 R;i',F + NORTH 8"z N 204rN~E7
I _ _ ~ I I ! I 1i I i l ! I I I - - _ _ _ - , n , : - _ E- l 1146, I -'TR CT(~ 472.20 47391 4R.. t` I - _ Y',; - T~P.GRA~ _ I I i II ~ 1 ~ i i , _ 3 ~ ' I`'~ -E-1046;$b. W °
- 4 r _ I I A9'i1 i ! i 4 1 1 ~z. Bo E t~ 4) , "#aA 1 I I 1 r, I r i 1 i i _ : ~ f- r"t'G - - E ~X EP t° i 1' I Y ` u ~1 a
7 ~ f X~EP RAi 4 3.57 _.L. - --i T + - l L I-r` ' ~ ,a~ A , I 72 3 4 24 2-13 72,17 t~~47d.A8 TP I f I i 1 , ` I'^` A 0 21-Is aom~
_ ? EX EP ~ Y 472. 4 :4.82 I h 1 1 i ! I Q n ra A ~ . 9 I X IEPt EN E~P f 47 ~ 1 , I I Q- ' \ 2.13 7 7 __1, ? I I + C NER Lo c o a~ 0 8
R $ g S ~ NA[CII_EXtSiING EX EP TOP CRAiE I 'I 1 ! I I I I n i'~. \ q ' 'I ~ ~ ___«"-'EDGE OF PAVING",- - - i I'. I C,' ! i ~ i I I I I ',1 c d E~jl 1111 c ° 'N-2 368.6 EjtJ6tl.T~~ ,I cF qliz
~ ~ ~_n'a1 _ - - - °-'-~i-~- ---F ~ - - - 7-h~- ~ -3-. _._.y._'~ _f- =i._ r-'t- _ 11; _ f ~,i A ~.t', § ~ E fOR GRADING IN ~'fl '
I , - - { ~ CONPACiOR AREA I I 1 I f t f 1 ( i ram„ 4't v` '.'1 - ! ~ C( , Se„ 468,90 , ~ , ' _ I ~'..i AE: ~I/C8.31 i I 1 1 t 1 I I l ,4~ 2.OX IY r 1 ~ f I ~ y yl.L 1.90 - - - v c c
4'V, .`I I . I ! I I I t , I 1 i', ) f-; X203 .14 , , 7 , k o 1 _ , 33 .14- UU° )KIS28` _rv _ _ _ _ 0 50 100 150 200
Y B I I -~-c- ~ ~ _.r__ -I-;'-- 4 .4 i E I 28
~ ~ „z o MATCH LINE RE C3.14 GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET
R ~ o n b O
an i
~d ~ ~ ` 0 ~ °o I - i
~ gg:'•~ !-.-.i.-.-.1 SHEET
~0 ;_s, ~x 1 AREA 2 GRADING PLAN KEY PLAN C3.12
hb C3. I2 SCALE: I'°5D'
$amo 3lv a5oa
Copyright © 2004 by Carter & Burgess, Inc.

- - H_ r
_ _ _ . 1 I _ -
6 ~ t ~ - 400 i 2 ---t= i _ . BENCH MARKS: - _7$AL-.
x ~ ~ ~ N 21102.21 .b ' E 9622.15
~ sy ~ , BOTTOM EL. 459.0 °,I ~''i° ELEVATION 488.78 p z; 2. TBM - CAP 9, 54' IRON ROD WITH CAP d ' r•'~,
~ i ~ a ~ I P _ ~ , ~ r. I .r'rr° ! 2 V 4 3:49 P > 'Sr 1 N 20977.38 ..~`'•,r 3:49 E 10436.94 ".477;;71
f ~ I 413. • 8 ~ t:~ ~ 4 3. 1 • _ ~I I1 i , i E P ER Ems. 1 ELEVATION 490.84 7 EX EP i p 3. TBM - CAP 11, 5N' IRON ROD WITH CAP
tt ~i j,~ i N 20222.19 E 11115.25 U_..... 1 ELEVATION 477.97
~1 f 1 BMsI BENCHMARK INFORMATION FROM SURVEY
~ ~ - - I READY LINE ~ ~ WTCN E%I67ING EOCE ~ PAVlNG AT NCGS MONUMENT 'VANCO' N 23021.07, E 11203.26
e CgiNER ~ j - , j ELEVATION 513.07
"N-2Da2L35- ~ ° ~ ~ E e2fs.oz _ _ TRAILER PARKING I I
0 i 1
,~_a _ '1 I, ~ ~ , ~r~ 3 ( ! j
I I i
i ' I o ~ l~ i n~. ~ i
- ' , ----h ~~j/ /
!t
n g ,~:IIII i~ a slc I ! i I ( i ~ e I~~ i II d ~~,IIi.~~i°~ I I I I II I 1 d ~ I ~
~ .lull", i i i i ,FIRE RISER R0011 d 'lip ~g a,:(, ;F~i , I SE,R R001 1 4
~ ~ FIR i
~ a ~ - - - ~ - E RISER ROOM I i y , f i f 1! ! 1
~!1 ~ x 'i I i i i I 1 if
~ ~ ~ s~v ~ i i i i i ,
i~ ~ € ~ i i i i II It I
Y- i i I i i i i ti
~ a ~ a 6 _ _ - _ _ I _ _ _i _._._I ._..f~~.FRIGE~AT10 I ii ! I! j 1O o
a a' a. r f- I , ~ .1. _ - - ij - - • i - - iLb
~ i I i i AREAi B i ~ I u 1 11 t 1 Z W O
~ - _._.1._._ - J _ I i I I i y f f 11 ' Z 1-j o co U
i' ~ 4'' I ( i ( i I I 0 QZ
~ ~ J! L I ~ I E f I D ~ - f -._._.i ~ ! _I. s If < a- 2f
~ R ~ ~ l & ~ ~ I I I { I y ~ ~ ~ II ~xo w co
v:° , _ ~ ~ I _ _ .ENERGY,' CENTER ~ 'I
~ S~ g~ , I I i ~ s ~ !I I - 11 1 ~N ~ Z
! ~ ` a s7E I ~ I I ~ ~ f 5 ~ 1 _ i li i i l1 w
, , ~ , I
d d ~ j - - - - - - - 6 i ~ ~ ~ c•
~11 ~22 R22 R2 ~ Z ~
Y C R A _ r N )y - ~ W f 3 ~ S •N „ i
i i , s y~ ~ ~ 4 S1 4i5 ft - $ _ ~ Z ! Q
7 ~ c _ . ~ ~ h J I
a : : ~ _ Y.. Y- 1a a 1 0
_______'-'I 1 Z
TRAILER PARKI
? al i i' 3 i~ l ~ i t I
>e a ~ ~ I I >c ~ ~ i 1 j 1
~ - ,I f ~ {u ~ ~ j ~ c 6 'I i yit i I 3
A7
_ ~ I R ee ' ~N; I - - ~ w
y ~i^ - - r , ~
~ ' ' BOTTOM EL. 463.0 ' Z 3 Z ~ nom- - - - - -
gg yy gg _
~ ~ ~ ~ I i
" , :f ~ BOTTO;ti~ E' , 463,0 ~ ~ t tip - 1
'psi ~g , I~ , ~ =ea j
w_ N 19235.84 ~ ~ - 35° 00'00,.
s ~ E BSRO.DO I L PLAN TRUE NORTH y gm
~ BOT f . E L. 462.0 ' NORTH 8y
W °
mx_....__.. . ~ a ~ , ~ ` P / 8 w - - e a Cry~m ~ ! 61 4 3
8 E h 16~ t\~,i < u'o
E § Wac $ c C 116 €1 c c° oar
sg I~,: 3 . Jj, I J ~ 1 ~ ~ y 9 z + n.i ~i ,II ~ cF o~~~ 'e
" r y~~ P c U c l ~ c.~ r
- D ~ ~ i t1 Y ~ ~ , A p _ V o0
- _~A c~ ~ 'v a
~ s ~ ~ ~ 0 50 100 150 200 C,
s~ ~ _ 4 CORNER f 7 t da r n _ N 19974,91 t t t j GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET / 1 r
Y ¢ ~ f 8959:76 I I t t i ;
'E - 933.35--~ ~ ~-8c _ ifl s - _..____--N 90°00'00'y __s x° r ' - *00'00'w 3
z AO U
v I AREA 3 -GRADING PLAN _._.i SHEET ~
~n~ C3. 13 SCALE: I'=50' ~aeo ~3;a KEY PLAN
f5~rc C3.13
3
Copyright © 2004 by Carter & Burgess, Inc.

l - -•-•-•-•-•-•-r•- - - - -•-•r•- - - - - - - - MATCH LINE RED C3.12
, t. ~ / _ _ i ~ • T _ ]r BENCH MARKS=
/ a. I h I I I I 1 I "I I _ I-- I'-- I ( j f I" ! ~ ...('I ...4-._. 21- 102.21
j TMG I L.I ~i ~ i, t ' -j ~ - ~ ;,1 ~ ~ I I I I I i ,'1 TC4T4. t r, N O~I3j391''~ r r=~. r , E % N 33#39 ORNi ELEVAT22 I 15 ~ 488.78 E 28 f = r, ' 0269.10, 1,,E. 1117tl.40 TBN CAP 9, 54- IRON ROD WITH CAP ',7 19 N 20977.38
IE ~ ~ I D w 1 I! ~ ; 1T , e ,E 0 9°6 , } ~ _ I I I I E ! I I I , I I FL 3. ~ " ~ ,~I, Y - ~ p ' ~ ~ ~ ~ I ~ II i '~i• i i ~ j i j i i ; i jl j i 17 L52 ~ ~ , ~ D 3{9
~ ~ (7 a 6r , I f MAT E3~ISi1NC TPt' ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ' ' ~ '~~1; A 1 4 -._._.Z `R'-'-I---~ _.L._.w.J._._._.I_._.yr.T~._._._~_._._.-~'_._._!_._._.~-. _I.L. _.L. _.`~.7 a z ~ p ~ ~ ~ j Pt10ING ~ I 1 ~ ~ ~ I - ~ ' 'I 0 ¢ 67 E 10436.94 ELEVATION 490.84
, I fly. t , I I Y ~~;,~1, ~I~ 4 Yt - > At `,1 I ~ I i ! I i/ 1 I I` I ~ I t ~ ~ i 'poi ~~II Si I " ; 3 TBM - CAP 11, SA' IRON ROD WITH CAP N 20222.19
TP t E% EP I ~ 1 7 ~ I • D~l' G00 S; Q 2~ ~ ~ " 's i ~ I ~ 475.56 ! , M ~ 1 ! ~ ~ „i, ~ ~ ~ ~ I , It CORNER { I E 11 115 .25 IN 20169.21 ELEVATION 477.97
f, 174.19 \ ~ ~ ~ ~ n. 'i ~ - _'_t,-._._.1.~._._L_.;~ ._.L._s_.~.-'---a~-'-~t ~€pt.-~-r-~-~1._._.~I-._._.L._.~`_L_._._.L._,_. ' ~;~I; o ~ y ' `E 11175j81 Of BENCHMARK INFORMATION FROM SURVEY AT NCGS MONUMENT 'VANCO'
' s~ I i i i i i i 1 i (i i i j ( ~ (3 , ~ i; 1>~ ~ ~ j _,'TP ~ . F,~ E~. 480,'65 w 1'.,' J,'` i i i ! ` i ! ~ N 23021.07, E 11203.26 ELEVATION 513.07
_J iu' 'ICI; ~ § I ti' ~ _ I 1' "t., I I I ~I i I i `r ' Q2.0% ~ , , ~ r
' 148 'I~ I ~ j k',I i _ Sri 'Its
'~Y Y Y t. 3 I ~aw~ 98p ! ! ",I i I ~ I i~ I ` r'l. ~a ~ ~ - i ARE i j l ( c i j'' i $-CORNER N 2006(f27
~ 1 ~ ~ t I ~~Q 9{ r~l I d~ f ~ ! i i 1 ~ ,u m m + , ~ ~ ,r,t , ~l> ~ ~ ~ ~1,
~ SIGN ~ -~~Ri~ FF I 1 ~~wrcNE>am~c '
~ t ) . ~ 'EDGE OF aAYING ~ I' ~ I ! I ~ f. S ; , ~ .07 I ~ i i I i - I ! , TC 474. io 09 7 94.`~ t ' ~ 65 1 E% EP . I I~, I Fl 413. 0 ~ r4 ,'t .07 t ' d t` d ,097,x.94!,', t 1fF`r J ~
,,e k1 I I ~ ) ( ~ r I i" ~ 4771 I', '1,' _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ ~ 479.041 T4 .43 I ~ . ~ ~ ~f ~1f trr a~ C r rt ~t I r, `r+e 4 CORNER i
I <<, ~ I ~ 1 I I 1 ~ I t # ~/~y t ~ n h n • l ~ . ' ,L1F tt~~,`t N 19969.27 1
E 11183.49
I -~;~IST{~7 .f ~~~t f ~ ~ Ve Ad,-' -Vw` ~ ,1~,• ~ ~ I i ~ I 1 - ! ~ ~ 1 ~ ' i _ _ -
I I r ~ 3 ~ - 'r'
is I ~ ~ f 47.0 ` T 478.21 n ' \ \ \ I i.r o . t I
- , r~ 6 6 •6 I ~ , ~ el - - _ Q CORNER N 19846.72 E 11187.92
~ ~ ~ ~ ( i j ~ ~ i ~ ~ of ;'L,'i+~ ~ - - _ r1 ~om~ .Jm
~ § $ oil I i 1 ~ ~ A \ i~~lti,','1,' ~ 'i~•, - - _ ~ , I I I _ ~ ~ 1~ ~ ~ COMER,T: _ T ~E U• ~ ut~~uH 1F~ D . _ 306. 4_~ ~ ~ a N ~,e o ,e i 3016.74
~ ~ ,i tit-ii ---I 1 rl i i ~Y ~ t, ' 1 -~HMD3~ ~ ° 10 M ~j _ ~ _.$EFR I_ ER~1TI ON.7+• '1 \ \ A I t, ;,1~ ~ ; I ~ , i --~'-S e ~C ~S g 57 ~ 10'W \ J
It M }i b' w~._. I bET~S'~ I 7~ceE_`_- 'Ri,vl,'Ye ' ~ OE i , i ~ .,i,s.-_ ~ = - - ~j j as , AR A~ I ~ I ( .Ci'"~ G I ~ ' ,tint i l ~ ,,`f~','' ~ o, ~ w• j I I I . i ~ a a , i I,,~,t, - s , I , 1,~',~ ~ 6rs ~ i+ ZE J ~ O Z
s a a~ ~ I ~ 1. 1 y~i,i i ,l, A \ ,o ~ O
Q o co U F ZZ
Q' _..J._._.~ - N I9T24R36 a Q E 11192.34 Z
~ ~ I 1 I _ . ' _ I _ a ASSQG~f~TE R~ARKING b ~ ,;,,~I, I; ;gl I SIRE - ~ P' i SIR I ' n _ ~ ~ ~Ir , ~ •:n' X o
~ I I , ~ ~ ~ ~ I iFl~[M.:A I 1S R I 1 - ~ \ \ l , ~ rill 0 32J 296:T1'------------ w ~ c!) 42 32'.E i W W T cr
R I l i _ _ 9 ~ ~ - ~ u I' i ~ ~ N 62 42 n r y Q
? ~>3 ~q I~ I I I I I ( i I ! ~ ` f ; / / in ~ 1 ~ ~ , ' ~ R C4YUlEA b n I 1 ~ I , 41 ~ / l ~ , ~ . J 5 n 1, i ~ i ~ ~ N 1968B, 70 Z 3
~fi g~ I ~ .!a~ axe I i E rut , ~ 1 y; ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ E 10896.02 , I 1 ~ i, ~ ACTO ~ . e CORNER ~1O W N I %24.37 I,^ @ 11195.95 U
is ~ ~ ~ I y ~ ~ - - r!:' - l~ `I ` ' y € t - - It ~ ~ 'I' ~ , I ,,I ' iy~1. pE 472.80 Fl 473.10 Q LL
~ ~ ~ _ "l' ' 1 gg ~ t--- I I I ~t A ~ ~ ~ ' t 2 c 1; ,.j t - I. ~
gg jl ~ ~ ~ - ~ , 1 , 1 -
I. " ~i~ ~~gll I - - _ r , Z
.
• „ ' i i 1~3 8 8 ~ ~ I I 'ill i ' . ' - v ~ F, `78 ~ I ~ ' „ ' 0 ~ E t1` .y 0
b D ~ ES t k I ~ , , . ' - s t 1 ~ i _z
AA / I ~ ~ ` ' I ~ BOTTOP~ EL. 467.0
I I I Q tr
i ~ ~ t i ~ t _ _ I _ o' ! 0
& R 8 I d S - _ - - - - - - - -
I ~ / - i~ ~ w _ ~ , . ~ . w b ~ 7 t 11 Q
T i ? 6 . _ ~ i u ~t----'-'~ ~ ~I i BOTTO~~: E~. 463.0 ~:o - W
8 ~ ' ~ t., , ~ _ _ Q
S ~ $ ' - f` \
6 4 t .d ` _ 1; ' \ ti .t ry, \S 3 3 3 ~ 1.--------- 1~1
5 5 r ' w. I ,~ys~ S - - ~ I ,
i ~ - = ~ ~ i ~ I ~ l`;
, ~ ~ , a ~ s ~ ~ i, 35° 00'00"
_ , , ~ ~ 3- ,t ~ , ~ 7 !f I 1 r V. PLAN TRUE NORTH y o
' 3.. I , , ~ . NORTH I .may a
. w, . , , , W ~ O s
, i ~ ; I ; I ~ ~ K C jL
f;~., t .~1i' 3 , r l~`, ~ s O W c 3 m ~ m a Y ~ f ~ O c u
a i-,'+° ~~TTOM aL. , 'III ~ s s 1,1 468.0 ~ r_ ~ ~ a j ; , LINE TABLE a c b a c N ~
~ ~ '~r , I , , , ~ ~ I ~ ~ , I rlj I LINE LENDTH 9EARINO dgt=8^«
' , - ~ ~ ~ 1/ t78 99.99' S 05'3YI4•E is c S 6 - ~ ,'7 2s
- - 7 ~ _ 1 Lt9 700.04' S 03'0104"E 8 ~ - y s l / ,d ~ ~ 1.20 100.03' S 02.25'55"E a 0 0 <
, n - - _ v ~ > y ~ ~ rc P', ` - l f ~1 r ~ L21 1W.06' S 01.5T03"E VV i
y ~ ~ L22 @2.63' S 02'D4't2"E r - 1 tit J , i 0 50 100 150 200 <
i St~ o ~ R ~ c; n GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET
R CORNER $ N 19076.64 en _ E 9935.56
~ H 933' 33 N 45' 24'25"E
~ N 90°00'00'M 59.67 o ~ e CORNER ~ ~ Q N 18974.94
: E 9693.09 SHEET i
s.. s_ ;S_n~ ~ n~ ~ 1 AREA 4 -GRADING PLAN KEY PLAN 03.14
; C3.14 SCALE: I'=5D' o
(~smu #~o`a
Copyright © 2004 by Corter & Burgess,Inc.

,
, _ __T~
1 , - ~ _ - -
(r~f~~, 02 1 \ 1 \ DRAW - I NG TEGEN6
p ti 1 P 1 y 1 ~ 1 I / 1 1 \ ~ SITE BOUNDARY ~ o 2!'
I I / 1 ~ I MAJOR DRAINAGE DIVIDE peM4. ~~o.
I 1 \ 1 MINOR DRAINAGE DIVIDE
FLOW ARROW
~ / ( ! ~ ( I \1 , , I } • / ~ f ~ /
_ I • r 0 4' DRAINAGE AREA DESIGNATION
EXISTING CONTOURS
~ I ~ ~ ° i/ A \ i~ ; 1 ~ 1 i~ ri= IA , r / ~ ~ I f ~ 1 ~
11 ~ t \
- , - -
, - ~ I , ."z , i 3
_ -
-~-=r.^
i~ l~_ ~ --'t - I i t ~ I 1 r L ~ - ? , , ~ i y. W/ I ~~J t 1 ~ . , ( 1 , ~ ~ 1 _ , a a ~
' / g
v` PRE-DEVELOPED DRAINAGE AREA CALCULATIONS
, r _ _
_ _ .__~-C _ _ _ _ - ~ f ~r _ i , ,^1 \ - _ -1 _ _ , /r / / I ~ 'r 3/ ` , ~ l - 2-YEAR 24-HOLIR RAINFALL: 3.5 INCHES 10-YEAR 24-HOUR RAINFAL: 5.5 1NC14ES - c
' i , ) I, 1 'i i J ' 99Y , , _ _,~'-~"~-T_. - _ - Z.+' VIN I , I A ( I , i r i i , 25-YEAR 24-HOLR RAINFALL: 6.2 INCHES z 100-TEAR 24-NOIR RAINFALL, 7.9 INCHES
i ; I / ~ r, ,.''T' -,„,-~F~- ~.n, - y ~,7 i v q 2-YEAR tO-YEAR 25-YEAR 100-YEAR 24+KMR 24-HOUR 24-HOUR
24-HOUR PEAK PEAK PEAK PEAK Z o m a = BASIN AREA SCS Tc DISCHARGE DISCHARGE DISCHARGE c
' ~ e - ~ I' / A I p ~ ! 1 . I 1 ~t~ ~~3 s ~ P. ~~O i I i A-IO ?.TI 9E DISCHARGE = m s ° tAA6Efl (AC,) ON PAIN.) (CES.) (CES) lCF8.1 (CFSJ
/ O . } A 20 1,81 / ` i A-]0 9.22 98 A-10 11.71 98 MINI 44.56 70.44 79.47 N ° T ° 0 00 A-20 4.84 98 10.00 18.42 101.39 A-30 9.22 98 MINI 35.09 55.46 62.87 41.91
/t'-s ~ ~ _ i r ~ I A-10 1.77 gg A-40 7.77 Be 61.57 79.83 10.00 29.57 46.74 52.73 67.28 Z A-50 8.96 98 10.00 34.10 53.89 60.81 77.56
A 6 0 , ti ~ i.95 / ~ r ~ ':l ( t 1 ( _ A-60 5.72 99 ~ ~ r ~ Iq 'y I ( i , ( \ ~ c-l9 5.39 9e A-60 5.72 98 10.00 21.77 34.41 38.82 49.53 O C-10 5.39 98 10.00 20.51 32.42 36.78 46.67
~ I, - _ I i ( MO 19.50 09 V j r- a t ~ ~ ~ f'3 i 1 ( I ~ ~ t ± ' II ~ c-3a 3.3e se C-20 19.50 89 29.20 39.05 68.80 79.17 104.21 cc 0 C-30 3.38 98 10.00 12.86 20.33 22.94 29.27 r Z i
4 1 , ~ - 1, ~ ~ i I ,1 3.91 90 c-Ia ~ 1 I _a ` C-40 3.94 98 10.00 14.99 23.70 26.14 34.12 Q C-50 0.33 96 10.00 1.26 1.99 2.24 2.86 ~ (L zf
/ ~ ~ / NOTE: I, eolabt;ons are Vase, on the Soil Conservot;an Serv;Ce's • X O
8~sar k - v'~ ( - u,' I _I ~ ,I calak n» ~ I ..a ~ i I 1 ,SCSI ul;t ny0rop opn metnoe. An $CS Type 1I ,istr;at;on eitN w o prop footor of 484 .-.A, age, for oll Hy' oon ' cplalat;Ons. Design rc;nfa
, ~ r E, ? i . - 1996. Dose, on metln,g atliM, .nllsSCSon, TR- t55 ees Seeon, of c E,it;oncentrot;an ore O 1986. A mini" time Of Concentration of I6 o;ates .os a5 Jule e,. 0) w
s x ~ , 00 Z
_ ii! M 3 w
3w - - I 't ' ; ~ ~ _ - - -t- ~ r Ur
' ``r - _ i ~ _ - ' / ' t _ ~ _ * 1 r ~ , - ~ ? \ v~~s.Z- ITS.. , , ~ ry ` N ' I ` \ ~ LL
i I( 1 I ~ ~ Y ~ II. h .._I ~ ti ~ 3-!. / 1 iA~--__- 8 6 ~ ! i 1 1 ~ i
, ~ ~ 1 i c4--~"~ mac: ~ I I r~ / \ IL
4~ ;a Dig„ 1 I / ~ ` w , / / a i. ~
- ' _ , , ~ ~ I , r ~ 1
r G~ ~lu~~ n - ~ / ~ / ~ _ ~c , t ~ r ~~il~ - I / - ~ / - ~ ~ _ - - tea`.',' • 0 ¢ Z
I _ i
s ~ - - ~ 1 _ W XU
~ 1 w¢
- / / ) t t I ~ ~ ! ~ I I p~ F 1 _ ! l ~ I I ~Im. A00- Z
/ _ , X11, 1 \ 3~ I I v
' - , ~ I , I I ~ , , f: y~ , r ' ~ ) ' ' Q~" i t ~ I 1 Y-_ ~ ,
R R r ~ _ ' r ~ ~ S , y _ I.,;u~ \ {
1 _ .1-1,,. t~ I _ , ~ 1 _ _t__,~ n _ _ ,I ~ r \ . -
n , ti , I
u - - } -dp-.
i-. 4., w,. - -sa- _ - e ,
ti w r _
. y - _x ~ ~ :.r - - _ Wis..: - - ~ - - P 1 y h ~ o t
-J. i . .r" - I ~ ~ ~ 'C` s p I
' ~I E I! t 1 \ ~ y J 'x_ Fm _ ~z
n E 1~ - - - ~ I 111 I 1 ~ i, n € t 1y I I ~ t - - - a . , ~ I I I v 9g ~ YI 1 Ca ~ C i
r a a \ ~ - ~ ` r~" ,rla'riits ia.: - I 1 p SpI Y« ~ ~ ~q ,x.,w.. "~j ~ - E, -.-~~~ii ft I I 'I ti c E
6 ~ ~ I I q 1 , ~ 3 r D t , 35e 00'00" o g m b»„
r ~~fr=- - - ~ I t PLAN TRUE NORTH NORTH

V0
n'm - - I- r O / 1' t
aH ~ _ ~~i Q, I i 'J ? I f I ( r I 1 I / t
y oS i _ r,? 1`x"3 /a 1 I / v rf I t
~I
4~~G a ~ q I 1 c
1 EXISTING DR I ~ I ~ AINAGE AREA MAP a C4, 01 SCALE: I'=1 DD' SHEET
~aeo £s;a 0 100 200 300 400
£;o& GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET C4. 01
Copyright © 2004 by Carter & Burgess, Inc.

1 ,
1
~ t _ 1 ~ , --i t-- y ~ \ \ ~ t DRAWING-LEGEND- :o d d
.~ti~? 1 't 1~ m ~ ~ - SITE BOUNDARY W y g r
a~~ ~ 1 t i I ~ 0 1 r ~ 1 i ~
t' L 1 1 l I { i 1 \ \ i MAJOR DRAINAGE DIVIDE
I 1 \ ~ A ~ , I I it 1 ~ _ ~ { ~ I MINOR DRAINAGE DIVIDE 1 ~
t i i - ! t I ~ _ ~ --.i'/ / ~ I t ' o FLOW ARROW 4
DRAINAGE AREA DESIGNATION
<< r ~ e
~ o a lei ~ ~ " 1 J !
s r DEVELOPED DRAINAGE AREA CALCULATIONS
, ~ ~ r~ J c,~ I r 1 ~ , 1 t Q, ~ / 1 / ~ 2-YEAR 24-M" RAINFALL: 3.5 INCHES
J , J ~ 1 . -S---j-'•....,~n_ - , r~dmu~„rmva ~ nx ~a ~nµa,vwv , ~ 1 r` - J ~ ~ ~ t 10-YEAR 24-HAIR RA IWALL I 5.5 INCHES 25-YEAR 24-HUR RAINFALL( 6.2 INCHES
- . - 100-YEAR 24-HOUR RAINFALL: 7.9 INCHES
- ~ -t - - - _ - _ , 3 ~ _ - - ~s. ,L 2-YEAR 10-YEAR 25-YEAR tt10-YEAA 24-HOUR 24410UR 24-HOUR 24-HOUR
~ J _ ~ vs' _ T, _ ' ra.neED ~ ~ ~ + _ PEAK PEAK PEAK PEAK BASIN AREA SCS TC DISCHARGE DISCHARGE DISCHARGE DISCHARGE Z
_ ~ t,; 4 5 HOMER (AO) CN MIN) (CFS.) (CFS.) (CFS.) (CM) ~ d A-10 11.11 98 10.00 44.56 70.14 79.47 101.39
J -=T,-~ v v A d i C A-20 2.55 96 10.00 9.70 15.34 17.31 22.08 A-25 3.09 98 10.00 11.16 18.59 20.97 26.76
" fL iS. I;~-I~ I~- ~ A-30 A-30 2.46 98 10.00 9.36 14.80 16. TO 21.30 - A-32 7.88 98 10.00 29.30 46.32 52.26 66.67
- _ ~ ~ A-37 ' i ,`P ~ Vic- t r i ~J 1 A-/0 A-37 3.82 98 10.00 8.49 13.41 15.13 19.31 q A-40 1.90 98 10.00 7.23 11.43 12.89 16.45
" _ - _ _ _ _ A T- si ~ _ - _ _ r , , • - 1 r. l 4 1 ~ _ - - ~ .F -5 A-45 0.01 68 10.00 1.05 2.69 3.33 4.95 A-50 8.96 98 10.00 31.10 53.89 60.81 77.50 - y`
- ~ D , ' ~ ~ ~ - c _ ~ . - A-60 5.12 98 10.00 21.77 31.11 38.82 19.53 C-l0 5.39 98 10.00 20.51 32.42 36.58 46.67
- - = c n _ r C-20 2.93 98 10.00 9.17 15.95 18.31 23.99 C-22 2.93 98 10.00 11.15 17.62 19.88 25.31 C-24 2.93 98 10.00 11.15 17.62 19.88 25.37 °z o m
, r , , ' a a.' _ ~qar 1 ~ C-26 2.58 98 10.00 9.82 15.52 17.51 22.34 c C-28 8.13 69 29.20 6.01 16.00 19.87 29. T3 m = at =
z*._ w' 7_/ , , - - ~ . i ~ \ C-5D [-30 3.38 98 10.00 12.86 20.77 21.91 19.27 a .e u - C-40 3.94 98 10.00 14.99 27.70 26.74 34.12 ¢ oW r o
4 ,e ~y - _ C-ID ~ C-50 0.33 98 10.00 1.26 1.99 2.24 2.86
dh ~ ,I i Il 1: ~1 ~ 11 .y ''3~iti C-'2 ~ NL NOTE: These C0laalations are MOea on In. Soil Conservation Service's (SCSI In it Nry0 OOraph rothoa. An SCS Type 11 z
_ 1 ' Cistr. fl rite a peaking factor of 184 was used for all O nYlo0ra0n calCUlatian. Design rainfalls ana times of Conoaltrotion are bog" an IletNgae outlines in SCS TR-55 _ SaCa d Eaitian, Jane 1906. A ainiauN tiro of concentration of co
' l 10 minutes sae used. f/ V
i I jog QZ
_ a X Z
L' q ~ p I ~ ~ ! l J / .ho-" v ~ - . ,zW.. ~ ~ i4 WW
/ n °OW
~ , , ,
S t / ~ ~ r t ~Tq i r J 7 i , ! . J j, 3 Z
~ r~ 1 tt . - , ' - U= 0
d 1 AA ee SS € A r~t~r 3 , - - - - a raw---t. ~ - ~ I - ~ ~ . y ~ { i LL
_ - _ _ , ~ R - r--^-- k
B 2 / ,r ~
~ ,axx~i
~ 1.. d ~ i ~ - i o - -
'1 ! 0<
I . 1:.. iv LU W O Cr
~i ¢
¢ a s..- r ~ I 1 r! w w J
t" . _ t i w _ rrsv j 4 R ~ - Jt 1 ~ i - 1 ~ iffi m, a.l'a. b j li \ r / JJJ Z
n ~ $ '~~I r \
~ 1 ~ / ~ ' //rl ~ _ J / i ~ vv 1 '~`f'o i / W J Cr
sr i a J ; 7 't l A ~ I'~ ~ C ~ ~ is , ~ ,
u~ , / ~ € ~ t. / i i t I ~ r i ~ v , , _ 1 fi:
3 ; .E _ _ ' 13 ~ d ~
------r- - ' \ rr ~ '
~ ? ~ R
- ~ ~ 1 ~ ~ ~ ~ C 1 - A a
.w ~ r - - r-~ - ^ ~ ~ ~ ~ 1 ~N
.yam _ - _ _ -~F'-''- '_,i i ~ fir. ~ ~ ~ 'm s w V «O V P al a C n~
- 1 t ,~r ---`'ice---- -z---s-. ~.a - ~ r _ ~ ~ i - ' K 1 , - t ~t F rv t`~ N 82 mR
I r J t o m~3e i y `Is 3 SLL$
, _ _ _ ~ i, ~•`~e(j , ~ a CO f i osmN~
. - _ r 6 7 , , ' t - r . E \ 35° 00'00" ~ a ~ .5 is n
~r \ , ~ , PLAN TRUE NORTH s~5 iZ r o NORTH
¢ Sb 3 ~ r _ t ~ 1 / o - S' , , / , i t - . m C 75
- °A o ' ~ , - - - r ! V du
li D ~ Gi ,1 Ji i^vGG Y--~ ti.px~~ S' i S r` / 1
if ~ N~ A i Q 1 r 1 ~ '~4 ~ / ~ / / I gi F Wij T n 1 f ~ J mil, / / I
I ,J - r ~ ~ ` / , 1 J / 1 / Arco i , / 1 ! / \ / J C
$ ~ fi J C7 / r ~ u~ / ' / J } 6 =_o ~ AV s i 1 i
& ~.rvx E i~ i~o~ ,_N~ ~ ~ DEVELOPED DRAINAGE AREA MAP SHEET
C4.02 SCALE: 1' 200' 0 100 200 300 400
o $i, GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET Cd T .0 2
c;'a a°~~rc
COPYright © 2004 by Carter 6 Burgess, Inc.

- - _ ,o
`a W N' O 2.
10-YEAR STORM PIPE HYDRAULIC CALCULATIONS
ACTUAL P[PE TIME OF CONCENTRATION PEAK HEAD LOSS A CHANGE IN SECTION ELEV. OF INVERT
DRAINAGE AREA HYDRAULIC GRADIENT SLOPE FOR MANHOLE OR INLET DISTANCE RUNOFF INCRE- FLOW DESIGN FLOW FRICTION ELEVATIONS VI Y2 HEAD ELEY. AT DESIGN POINT INVERT ~N POINT
PARTIAL DESIGN POINT BETWEEN INCREMENTAL AREA TOTAL COEFF. MENTAL TOTAL INLET TIME IN TOTAL FAEO- [NTEN- IN PIPE SLOPE UP- DOWN- FLOW FLOW Y2++2 VI++2 Kj jYl++2 LOSS OF HYD. PIPE PIPE PIPE
FLOW POINTS AREA AREA C CA CA TIME SEWER TIME UENCY SITY PIPE SIZE Sf STREAM STREAM IN OUT 2g 2g 2g Hj GRADE [N OUT IFT/FT) FROM TO {fEET> N0. (ACRE) (ACREI (MINI IMIN) (MINI (YRI I[N/HRI (CF51 {INI fFT/FT) IFT MSLI {FT MSLI (FPSI IFPSI (FTI {FT) (CONST) IFT) {FTI (FTI IFT MSU IFi MSL) OUT (FT MSL) REMARKS
0.0047 0+00.00 1+06.26 106.26 A-40 & A-45 2.77 2.77 0.90 2.49 2.49 10.0 10.0 10 6.5 16.2 24 0.0030 473.23 472.91 0.0 S.2 0.41 0.41 473.65 467.00 466.50 466.50 LINE A-20
0.0110 1+84.97 6+66,96 481.99 A-31 3.82 3.82 0.90 3.44 3.44 10.0 10.0 10 6.5 12.3 24 0.0058 411.79 469.00 0.0 1.1 0.79 0.79 472.57 469.48 464.18 464.18 LINE A-30
0.0014 0+00.00 1+84.97 184,97 - 0.00 3.82 0.90 0.00 3.44 10.0 I.I II.I 10 6,5 22.3 24 0.0058 468.71 467.70 1.1 1.1 0.79 0.79 0.70 0,55 0.24 469.00 464,18 463.93 463.93 LINE A-30
0.0041 0+32.52 2+41.14 215.22 A-32 7.88 7.88 0.9D 7.09 7.09 10.0 10.0 IO 6.5 46.1 30 0.0075 469.74 468.13 0.0 9.4 1.37 1.37 471.11 466.51 465.63 465.63 LINE A-40
0.0041 0+00.00 0+32.52 32.52 A-30 2.46 10.34 0.9D 2.21 9.31 1D.0 0.4 10.4 10 6.5 60.5 42 0.0021 468.13 467. i0 9.4 fi.3 P.F. 468.13 464.63 464.50 B 464.50 LINE A-40
0.0158 0+00.00 0+31,51 31.51 A-25 3.09 3.09 0.90 2.78 2.76 10.0 10.0 10 6.5 18.1 24 0.0038 467.82 467. TO D.0 5.8 0.51 0.51 468.33 465.00 464.50
464.50 LINE A-60
:z a
- o
gT mz
o= ~ um zmz ~'z _
6 N C a N G
Z
O co U
~ QZ
a~ X Z
~M w o
1 ~ToC
ow
~Z 3 w
U=
LL
10 YEAR CURB INLET CALCULATIONS
z
0/l (CFS/F T1 3.0 x (H1J'~' O
10 YEAR GRATE INLET CALCULATIONS HI.1B IHCMES (4• CUTTER OEPRESS1oN~,6' cueel 10 YEAR FLUME CAL CI 0/L ICFS/FTI • 3.0 x (0.831 = 2.27 CFS/FT iME CALCULATIONS Q J
USE 2 CFS/FT U
CAPACITY OF 10' CURB INLET = 20 CFS CAPACITY FOR CURB OPENNG 4x4 GRATE INLET (PEAK FLOW FOR AREA A-25 18.08 CFS) 0 • C • L • H 13/2)- 1.1 CFS/FOOT OF OPENING (WENt J IT OF OPENING (WEIR FORMULA) Q
PART OF AREA A-32, 0=CIA=0.9 x 6.5 IN/HR+ x 6.D AC. = 35.10 CFS ,IG • 33.0 CFS U
CAPACITY OF 20' CURB INLET = 4D CFS MAXRAUM 010 TO 30'FLUME OPENNC • 33.0 CFS FRANE AID GRATE -TWO NEENAH R-4780 IOPEN AREA IS 6.2 S.F.) MAXIMUM 010 TO IS'FIUME OPENING •16.5 CFS (PEAK FLOW FOR AREA A-70+CARRY OVER FROM A-321 IC • 16.5 CFS _U
MAXIMJN 010 IS 35.10 CFS 14.33 + 18.22 = 32.55 CFS 8 ~ 2.00 FOR SAFETY FACTOR (CLOGGINGI J
~ ' W O=C+A+2`H CAPACITY FOR FlUlf~ Q
~1 A 6.2 S.F, g = 32.2 Fi/SEC 0 • 1.49 / n x A ~ Rh"' x s" IMANNNG'S EQUATIONI ANNING'S EQUATION)
H 0.47 FEET (SEE GRADING PLANT MAXNUM 010 TO 5'FLUME WIDTH • 64.68 CFS 0 2% SLOPE $ (0.7 + 6.2 + 2 32.2 + 0.47 I/2 16.88 CFS 64.68 CFS O 2% SLOPE
~ 35.10 - 16.88 = 18.22 CFS CARRY DYER
y
b8 'E FDR INLET CALCUlAT10NSI FOR WEIR FORNI1LAa FOR MANNING'S EC FOR MANNING'S EQUATION:
~ ~ 0• DISCHARGE, CFS O= DISCHARGE, C R R 0= DISCHARGE, CFS
)1 € C= COEFFIC[ENi OF DISCHARGE, USE C• 0.7 n= MIANNINFS COE g ~ A• OPEN AREA, so. FT. 10 YEAR DROP INLET CALCULATIONS A= FLOW AREA, s n= MANNINFS COEFFICIENT, USE n=0.013 A= FLOW AREA, SO-FT
Y ~ y= ACCELERATION OF GRAVITY Rft= FLUTE HYDRA Rh= FLUME HYDRAULIC RADIUS, FT.
~ ~ H= DEPTH OF PONDING, FT. 5= FLUME SLOPE 0/L (CFS/FTI 3.0 x IHIII~' y a „ 5= FLUME SLOPE, FT/FT. °o c V t
H1.6 INCHES iR S v 0/L ICFS/FTI = 3.0 x (0.501'~t'= I.O6
USE ICFS/FT m uc
CAPACITY OF 4'X4' DROP INLET = 16 CFS o `rn =3
(PEAK FLOW FOR AREA A-40 L A-45 • 12.81 CFS) a9 CLL m
3 7I 11f c E'1118 ,
~ 3 ~ E 8 ~
s2
S ~o ~ 's~ ~ V u°u°
s~a~p
5 ~ " :fie s5 zS,3 ~ g ~
~ ~ ~ a" R
~ i; ~ ;u = $ @ 3ym x ~sn
aw Y Y °5
~ ~
~ ~ ~x SHEET
Z,C V 4/j
H W M a C4.11
~3mo 3~n ~~§rc
Copyright © 2004 by Carter & Burgess,Ina.

• BENCH MARKS: _ . - __---t --Telr--eArc- '-tNeN xoo trl7sr tAr _ s : aP~. •
N 21102.21 •o dw E %22. 15
R ' ' 2Y 544' 44 t e C NE ELEVATION 488.78 W h ' o 2. TBM - CAP 9, Sib' IRON ROD WITH CAP
N IIT ,/3 E 9184./~ ;4 z 91 ,41 `CORNER + N 20977.38 ••''pa,c E 10436.94
S R ~ ~ ° ~ A CUANER E , , ~4 ~ ~ E 'N 2i1 4 + \ ELEVATION 490.84 3. IBM - CAP II. 5/9' IRON ROD WITH CAP
~ ~ E 9094 ~ ~ 1 e Cdlll?iR k ~ ~ ~ t N 21424.-YT-. y g A t 5,,, E 9510.28 N 20222.19 E 11115.25
~ , N 21~4T2p43 • 'y o ~ e CgilER ~ e CORtffA ELEVATION 477.97
~ 8~ ~ E 911P~41 tt N 21413.42 N 21364.40 a a a E 9528.58 E 10713.57 y y CORNEk i _ (CORNER^"--- 10 BM*1 BENCHMARK INFORMATION FROM SURVEY i7 AT NCGS MONUMENT 'VANCO' N 23021.07• E 11203.26
r E 9106?361' ' 1 ' N 21329.77 i d E r; t ~ E9669.65 eCORNER ELEVATION 513.07 t CORNER
•p ~ 1+ 2 N 21274.89 ' i \ ~,e CORNEA / E 10771.52 N 21274.89 E 10771.52
~ R ~ ~ _ ` \ , ~+N 21348,05 f' t CORNER
~'a II I S 6.~8 I , ~ N 21192.90 rr p~ ,pd6~P" CORNER ~ ~ E 10828.89 N 21192.90 E 10828.89
~ + s-t? ~ I N 21168, 6T Qh c 0° ° C CORNER
h ~ ~ ^io'S~~' ~ _ s r ~~~ao•, ~ Ij CORNEA - - r' ~ 6 : u'^, L ~7V" _ '1 a y. N 2 n l l .2i li ~ ~ , ep ~ f3UARDHOUSE,,.' 1 ,j T. > N 21111.20 E 10886.72
t r^\ ~ ~ ¢~r~ a I i? E 10886. s~ s~ s / \ ~ a COANER jt~ `1, A( 1 , •i+~~ / ° S / ~ li'tviJ,r S+F~9w
• 1 g ~:Y_~d " ~~e~ N zlol4.9T e c A + ,_hb ~ t.`;~E.__===-- , E 10459.47 +~'t ~fi~~, , ° _ FIRE--RUNIP,~U =~ti'-;~- n , ~,v t Nz Q CORNER N 21028.17 E 10942.53 ~
, _ _ - + - CORNER K/r~~l ~+11 1~-- -._...y-='y=--"°'.`-~-a. ' - ~ _ _ - - e- N_
e - _ - _ _ . / , ~ ~ ~I~ . N 2097 .6T 1 - _ - , , - CORNER ^ N 20941.94 -
- # _ 'tea s9„ .i 2 r ' _ r E 10993.26
, ;a . 8 R m ORNEA ~ ~ - 1 r _ M f - - 20881,51 _ ~~ri~ x` A ~ ~ _i ~ l- It CORNER jr• 2 N 20851.40
~ ? E 8491.35 _ ~ _ - -='~--~-+--i } ' - ~ A I ~ ; ~ l ~ ` I I ~ r , - - E I"35.Te
d ,{~taru4ER 'tf~ ~ r.,K t i~~ as ~ i~ Ii , - , :8585.15- ~ _ - _ ~f a ~,i 1•';:. ~ yE• s;~S ===nom.== =:f`7-s.~":'~-=:=`= - 1 .I` 'hd -i - t CORNER
- + I , L.~ ..P aCER!&R. _ I - ~ RAI - _ - - ->_r--- xx '#~06T5 TT. - ° _ _co~-- 1?~i;"'=~- \,1'`~= • 1i„ N 20758.08 o m z I"---- _ - - E 11072.01 0 0 og- \s t CORNER c a o Y d o
9
N 20662.62
, ~ I y - i... - _ - - - - - _ _ti I I + ,r _ _ , , 1 es~ t -I_ _ - _...-_.n - - ' ) ,III I 1- E 11101.88
)I,~EiI'~~" y - - r, - -h.~:},, ,RD k, II I I I ,I r ~1tv 'F' , , - _ .<irftd,,r"' _ - - - -R-60°.,~"mss.:==~qp~ "'4~ 4 I ~ I i I" , 4 CORNER Q
' ~ 7 = ys ~ / I ha, / _ ._.ar~_ _ I,' t I ' E i 5 1 r ; I ,l I : ~ a -1-` , r - - N 20565.84 t I} E 11127.25
d ~ ad , 0'~5 _ i t ' I I ~ I I L" I 1 ; 1 3 ( ~c gg,, z: z
iR' w, is ~ $l~ I 1 ~;~I - a"7< I I C I I ~ 1 1 1 I ;I vs ~ - i `?c'+K. ~ aI V :i (ir p _-d~. _ .-S.~ - - - - I I - -I ~T~ rjt a CORNER (L Z N 20467.68 X 0
~~''~'>f 'i- 1 ~R1~I~ ~ RAILEF~P' ~ ~~1,._i -i a - . r ~f „1 1 +i .N I~~ j i I 1 t I I' I I , ~ , - ~ ' I I ~i 1~.~ + E 11146.56 W
_ w - ~ - + , ~ : F`v: " ~ I _ ~ w T Il
- . r1 41 I k ~,~a I I 1 _ I ~ r Y ,I~ , v ~ 11x;11. RR a x ~ , 11[ I t~~•~i i i-'~ a ~ 1+ fi` f ' 1 -,,_._1_ ~ '•s c ? ~ a ~ a?, ~ 111!a~I I ~ f , t 1. ~ ~ t.'t~ Q C CORNER Q N 2368.63 . l E 11160.78 O Z
R I , _ ~ 1 -,~~~I _~'p, FF ,EL,; 80.65 ~ 1 i d n ~ !I ,ia 1u _ SO I b' 1 • f.. , ~ - w
E n CORI$R [ ~ a , __TRA~i'TQR-. P Y/ -i-~'~•-.-•-r-' - - - ~ r - '4 - ~ - i, OIE1li __.r Y -i1 ;-i-I ~ 1 1 1~ ~ ~ ~ ~a N za33a ~ ~~[i (IU~111I, - - G ~ F.UEL!`•(S~LAND1. 1 TMG PARKIN b I , s • ~ ~ ~ E7913.4 I' 111'1111' ' - '6 I_I _I I_ I ~ I I I I' Q~ i - - = t CORNER U N 20269.10
~ litNlit i ---~`f-"-1T-7 ~ i T~r`i-?T-T_~'-(,~'+~~ h W , i J ~ $ ~ $ `^ti. - 011111 1 I~~' FUEL. STi4RiAGf>:`. ir' i ; i i ~ t E 11170.40 LL
1~~ § § ~ _ ~ I - - - - + ~ II1G10{ a ~ - II I!' r-- {u.•-I-•+F -T~~•I ~-f-. ~ .I i ~ ..~.~.I ,I Q ~ a ~ r ~ - - - ~ 1- ~1 , y ,
y - - 1 k77 # ~ ~ H 36 r ~,(ai' I (~11 i~l);I - I ' 1 I; i ' I ~ I ; I- -1 1 1 -I 1; I I F., ~ ; c c s s I , I~ . i- ~-_.3 --rr•--~-~ j .'I I; " i ~ t CORNER N 20169.21 E 11175.84
t3 ~ u S~•iQ, „ ~h I i'?~ Ij i('I I I ' ! ~ ! I Irl i h • ~ - a~: - ~Jlii,~`l la ia'l~:. ~ a ~a a.a,~'~,~ i' . _.~,,-._.~L y.r.~._+_r~._.~!~_:_.T._.y.~:~._. M, ,j
~ ~ ~ ~ - ' 1 I ,•k I ; i ; - 1 , f L, 1 I; 1 , I 1 , I 1'"' , ~ it CORNER
~ ~ ~ - - `~~LINE I - t i`,-y.; i i i ,I i I _I_' 1; ' I - ~ ~ ~ - READ _ - - - - _ . . -r ` I -I i -i i. 1. .1 - I ~ , . ' N 20D69.27 ;'R' In;~i----- I E 11180.09 Z
_ , S ~ ~ 8 Z' I ~ :=~__~~\i a~"'~ ea ;a .~2 ( t ! I _i is f- i i; I -s~-r E 8215.02 \il\\ a, ~ ~ I! ,.I .r-._ - -.R._, - 1 Q J co
1 - =d --''Ne,. [ ' ~y•~ ~ ;j"', pl Q I I I 1 i• I -1~ 1 t I ~ 1' { + ~ i a CORNER CL f~ N 19969.27 1
~i i E 11183.49 l f J,.'t J z
il~~.~l~ _ rrx,~a ! I i i I ~ ~ a - ~~f. \t I I 1 I i eol I I I _ -vl
I;ill~',I[ I I I ~ I I i ~ I I C . ,te I ` ~ I„ ~ w- _ t CORNER N 19846.72 w
~'if1~111t _ - - - - - - - j ~ ~ ~ • -T-F a. ~J;;j• 'k COIRffR-'-z''~. p "1"~~ - r "R~ i~B~bI'- _ ~ S ,[III,1i11 _ ~i ~I -I 1 I i I ~ C ~ 4; --"ice-- ~ E 11187.92 E~
- I I I I - - I I o ~4 „ o .t\, „Y` E 1028~;sb,'-'r;• - 30~ ~ Zr fC,~ '1ga1Ul 1 1 1 I I I I ~ . O - 10'W
a I ~ - 2 °s R 1o1~i1p~ Q I 1 i 1 I EFRIGE~i IQ1~ I I I ~ ~i ; , , ~ ~ 5 6 I I - t" , a a s ~ s , . i1;Iilt - - . 4 R CORNER N 19724.36
~ } , r I iht~ 4 ~ ~ ~ ' / tia' I ~ E 11192.34
a!{i~ W~ 1 1 1 I I I I I I I I 1 ' a -d ~ • ~ 296.71' u
~ ~ a -r sf ~NE~G`~ C NTER . , , ~~I„ ~ ~ Y Y Y r' F-- I Q 1 I I I i 3 I _I 'j'~ J 1 I C a i! o a m I \ lh 82° 42"% E
- - Ip I : ~ _ . L, - v ~~,~f ?±ti:,: + t CORNEA : j : a_ f I 1 I i ~l tL' ~"I~ ~ ~I1, e ~ 'x 1%86.70 a CORNER ti N 1 %86.70 \ E, 10898.02 IZ CORNER
S g _ 'sl T I i .r tt - - `\1 1'I~ - - ~,J' tV ~a a _ ~ \ N 19624.37 \ + E 11195.95
, r _ - ~ w ~ 11111, #a a a~l _ I, ~ , OCIATE`v~
fJ t N Mir ~ r r - . - KING y .o.z
~ ~ , r.. ma I . __--~-------f----- ~ ~ . - 1 ' / W ,t/' ~ O O C n V p
~a - - _.,i1------------ _ _ RAILF~--PAF~KING iI°f ,fir, , ~ ~ ui g r h
1. Y.. ~ IIIi ~~?I`4 ~ ~1 ( ~i~ ~ ~If~I~ d~~ f _ - = r:rr ~~0 \55~ t _ • ° 1 ~ my m - L
r ~ . • - ~ } L ` - - a -'S a Y _ i _ ~ mdJc °o c 2 a ~
, _ Y - - --Y- - _ ~ " - ,
! - I !X PLAN TRUE NORTH ~o
R ~ € . 1. . ~ _ ~ _ NORTH v
8 t _ ~ - _ _ _ 14}~ .1r + f iuv~ ~ ~ i eLORNEA lp l'-~~=xs _ _ __a__ - _ ~ _ i + ~1. , i 1 V V C
~ ~ N 19235.84 1 J ~ + a a C
C
Y 3 N596o 1 } IJ~ ~ -6a\y
$ W f1 ~ 4i - - - ~ , ~ t
~ z ~''a'- r C
`o°n y e`CDRNER nw t~ - .r' 93'i.31f + - r~ tN 1'1016.84 y ~ a` - ~ ~ 'E 9935.58 C SHEET c
~ K "N`90°00'00'W r ! eCORNER
y _„o~ a'C~` r„r' eCORNEA_ - r' JI N 18974.94 >O5 ~7 $ r' a r N 18974:94 ~ E 9893.09 a d r ~ F~ 9959.16 , ' 0 100 200 300 400 C4.21
a -STORM DRAIN PLAN ~x ; 1 OVERALL GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET
a C4.21 SCALE I' IDO'
~,",o ~s -a Copyrignt © 2004 by Carter & Burgess. Inc-
~~~a

1 N~ N NN,y,4 i
/ S s4"3z~y44•E 1 E . LC013~AP1~544.It 8.61 t ~ _ _ 1- BENCH MARKS- 11•• * -
_ , -1~ ~ ~ 1 ~ E 918A:41 a CORNEA I I N 21102.21 :b E 9622.15 s
N 21539. I ` E 9191.42 I I 2 1 ELEVATION 488.78 O1 j o y'am' ' o 2. TBM - CAP 9, IRON ROD WITH CAP •';de S.
~ s ~ 1 !E ~ ~ R y I e CORNEA ` I N 20977.38 ' E 10436.94 •k • N•••'
~ P N 21472,13 ~ 4 I ~I aa ~ E 911~c41,• _ ` t 1 ELEVATION 490.84 ~
~ 9 C09NEW' 4454' S4'Y t 3 7 ~ N yy1454: I :88' ' ( 1 3. TBM - CAP II, 59' IRON ROD WITH CAP j N 20222.19 E 11115.25
~8 S C E.90~1 2 ~ I ~ ~ ~ i ' R CONKER; g N 21460.18', - ~ I & ELEVATION 477.97
b ~ E 9124.32; ~ ~i° \1 t d?, , I BMSI BENCHMARK INFORMATION FROM SURVEY AT NCGS MONUMENT 'VANCO' N 23021.07. E 11203.26
N 45°t4160'E~~ t f2, d ~ 9 `i ` 1 ELEVATION 513.07
i ' ~ C08N~R ~ / C~ 44°45'1Y'E ~•~1442. TI y ` 0
~ ~ ~ 6.95 E 4~F~,36- ~ I M 41
n • r ,~,,~c~.~~, ~ i - ~
I~ 1 - ~~1~34R.os, ?Iv448R051 '
w_ I E 460. I '.s~ q_ w_ ; i, ~ .I 9460.• j - i r 1
_1 1 ~ ~ ~ ~ 1 a
7 II/~ i / ~ ~ 1 ~ -
R i ` t ~ I
~ a 1Z ~ ! 6J S. ~ ~ ~ ~ k a ~ ~ r ~ 4~~ t ~ a i ; l o
. ~ , / U ~ ~ 8 ~ ~ Vii.' ~ ~ e
5 by r ~ t ' pI $ / ~ °.y5 t 1, I i~;~ , ` r //f.~S. ~
i
I g^ o~
~ .i ~ ~ / ~ ~ ~UARDHOUS~, , ,N i~ ~ ~ ~ ~ r ~ + i ~ , • M ~M
i i , '
` y J LD _ Z
a , , , 6 x / ~ ' _ - - 777- W O
.o ~ ~ v y _ ,,..r, :..1 Z _ I o co U
~R e ~ s - / ~ Yi - .480 -~-'T-;_ ,~y~..,' _ J sq .r '',yC q.. 9.. i_ a , _ . ~ ~ _F
~ I ` / _ U r . X O
~ ~ - ~ C~- Q _ _ I i _ .~.L~__~-__ r__.. 4 ` - - - =1~=----- f ' v... tp _ s ~Nt. ~ , - i - W w
~f ~ ' - ; _ o a ° 0) W ?'4 O Z
t ~ 4 ----------------------r~ij,~r' -
ti „ ~ ~ - ~ , e coANEA ~ - o b ~ P 20970.61 n L l-I, 3 (D W
d CN - ~ ! -a^r i i ~N g' ~ e CORNER ` g ~ '2 a t j U= o
N 20881. y' z ~ ~ / i5i ~°i ~ $ E 8491 ~ ,Ap 85.75 / ' LL
9B -
$ ~ $ 180,1126"E <>g - - .1
I~ ~ ~ e .TT' - - 75
i ~ ; l v - a55%~" ass : cr- Z O
~ ~ S :--,i
is s i~ s~ !I - - , = A U.) CL
STA._0!00~00_LINE_A-60- c~
~ r _ "'M! BN PROfEL`YION_ _
, ,Y~ _ - - -R 20649:44"-----_,_"_'-_ ---------.._-I W 0 --I Ir
r ` ~ . ~ , . , ~ Q t 1
- . X65 - ---__.---~b-- - '_1LIE~"- c - . _ 1 > ~~`MaT- - - ---24-ACA-`~o+;
n~ . / ~ - - ~tr== jj~~ ,
r f 0 , , / i \ f. ` e .6i i t I .
Y Y Y / bS,J ~Ili~~i r ~91 t ~ "1 .r •r / p e;. X11,. ~1 4'" \ I i
3 i : 3 / ~ ~ r / r' l.,~r pt STA. Oy31 p52 LItENLETO `
S ~ ~ / : ~jj' ! REV3rC4I51~~ - { ~ R / I' ! / / ~ ti/: TOP OF INLET • 469.50 ~ ~ ~ ~ / ~ I ~ ~ j ~ ~ FL 24' • 465.00 ~ J i
f / 7~, , ~0 N 20612.42 ~ ~ ~ r 't'f a E 9393.73 i 35° 00'00"
Q ~ ~ ~~.i E ~ ~ ~ n i C iif f-, PLAN TRUE NORTH h NORTH y g z
- - ~ ? ' a L'am'. r ' _r./""" F i fy i i ~B • N
AA RRRRRR ' ' ~ w_ q.. r ~ k - 'E ,~r' _ ' 6Q € {j o~ H 8An _
t ~ ~ y, ° mc;-
- N ~ a' ~i II
j 1 ;i:'i ' L O
a ! ~ i i{{i' I f ~ fi ~ III ~''I c~U c
ME € I >e € e CORNER ~ ~ ~i; ~l' j 5t
~ ~ N 20334.674 ~y,. ~ a- ' T , ~ ~ ~ g~g ~ E 911. ;f - 'lj'`, 1 ' a o UV 7 . i
y 9 ~ N 'Gr~~, - v ~ i y ii
s ~ ~ o ~ i , ~ I~ 1 t 10 50 100 150 200 i
iv§ GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET
# ~ ~ ~ R it A LL'u
¢~;m-
~ fan ~~I~~ 1
,3~~ y ` SHEET
i s i of _ E 1 AREA 1 STORM DRAIN PLAN KEY PLAN 04,31
~ C4.31 SCALE: i'=50' v
y a ~aeo
~;;a ss°5o& O01 Copyright © 2004 by Carter & Burgess, Inc.

I _ _ _ . -777---.-- BENCH" MARKS: - ISIS- YtITIf~- N 21102.21 :o r d
~ 1 E 9622.15 ELEVATION 488.78 W N w
~ a ~ 2. TBM - CAP 9, IRON ROD WITH CAP >a ¢?'S , N 20977.38
R I ~C,' E 10436.94 ~A' • „o`'~ ELEVATION 490.84
R ~ ~ t 0 1 COA~R 3. IBM - CAP It. `+fB' IRON ROD WITH CAP N 20222.19
~ ~ I 424.27 ~ $ ~ ~ E .9510.28 E 11115.25 ELEVATION 477.97
~ ~ ~ 5;59°20'02'E ~ 2128 BM*I BENCHMARK INFORMATION FROM SURVEY AT NCGS MONUMENT 'VANCO'
~ ~ I i! CORNER d g N 21413.42 ~ E %28.58 N 23021.07, E 11203.26 ELEVATION 513.07
} I R CORNER N 21361.40 6r E 10T13.ST
;t I ' Op. ~ ~ ,
~~SS SS ti ~ CORNER ]g _ I F N 21329.iT ~ ~d ~ ~ ^ E %69.65 . i c` >
s' ~ s - rcp .~.N I , - ..i
I I v
`ti / I v / I e CgiNEA
/ I ~ ~ N 21274,89 i / i -r, E 1077152 S
w d , rx / - i R 2 I f S ti ,'TSB I - m i ~ ° ~ R ,8p° •3p. I
~ S ,d ~ I . _ _ _ /j 36• tea",
1 ~ I / CO R 9 \ !CORNER S^ ~ j \ ,
u ~ ~ N 21 68.67 ' ~ N 21192.90 3 Ir' / - ~ 10828.89 E 9955. T h E / 4 / 0 4.`,
i~ R I / 1 ~ / ti' ti° a Ib 1 } ~ f
g 8 S ~ I~% ~ ' ,1~~ 1 I hb ~y ~2 a ,
i ` i . N a o Z io m
>r rl \ ~ STA. O+OO.OO LINE'A-20 • 1a ~ ~ e CORNER ~ , ~ ~7 Ol' / - _ I'~ - I J ' ~ N21ItL20 IA ~ ~ ~ ~ EXISTING 2-24' RCIS o ' 9 E 10886.72 -e CORNER ~ m N 21111.20 aH,.." ` - E 10886.12 g'ioro>°~oi;o
CONNECT 24' RCP iA ~ ~ ~ cCT V{.______.-°::_-_----- - , X iN P F T / SU. 0+03:53 L1 -20 MS?6. ----'+Y'~ ~ Iu' U'IL'TY EAS 6£"+' _ EIS] G ORO INLE ~,T; " ~ r- 9'' ~ - _ - ~ y'. ~.,CONSiEA,hctOPi INLFik` ,.S ~ ~
Y y WE-------,:~:"~,~; END EXISiiNG 2-21",RCP ~t ' THROAT EC~4 7 ~ i ~ 5 i,3j ~ ~ _ _ ~ ~ _ 1~i1N~,2l.; FRCP LiNE X-20 '~'i'OT' ! x ~ - RIME • 4 I FL 24'~=, 467.00 F a O ~ ~ ya i ` z
7 ~ ~ ~ '~fU.E,M~2-29' ~'966t3S ~ ~ - - CCORNER J~?i~`~~ 1 , ' S J, Op°--- E 9908:86•_-- - - ~ ' ` ? N 21014.97 ! ti ~ Z~----- _ _ _ FL-24,46i.~5_F•._,~ - E 1045. _r1 ? \ O
_ _ _ - ~ ' i_ JI~ - - .:£_$8.3e,a'7::: - _ \ i j ? jCORNER - _ _ _ y~ / ~ ? t ~ r ~ N 21028.1 \ e CORNER o C 5 U N 21028.17 Z z
I - - _ - : - ri : E 10942.; _ ~ _ _ ' E 10942.53 Q ~.C
X z
- ' 7/- f - - <,,'ti; ^ _ \ i tom{ , !;-`1 <i w O X
°0, tz ~ Vv a a -`~"~"^"~G _ a~9{fib 'RC,o 1 ~ ,•_-_'._-~''"~.y.-. ~ _ v 4 j p O w V e CORNER
, ' - - x R ~s ~ ail ~ l r^,i _ e d - ~ N 20941.94 ~i E 10993.26 z ~ W
z- ~i ,8 ~pk~ ~ ~ A.=° _ 1 ~y 7 , , I ~,t o
, ~ ~ I ~ i ~ 1j-.. 't , I t S ~ 5~3 , - ~ p{ G t I A, i, ~,I yyyy ri i 1 LL
l , ~ , . i E f } ~ . 1, . Y. V v ~ ~ ~ V' S' ~
~ ~ 6 ~ ; P~..~ °5 .a ~ ~ I co _ ~ti, _ I~t, , e CORNER 1 N 20851.40
- ~ - ~ ~ - _ r- Q., I: 1, 474 ~R~1. ER PARKIN ' ,;r,~~,.`; , r, n E 11035.78
I 'r , 1, ~ ~ ~ F ~ _ m , t _ • ~ ' _ STA. rp0100~ A 30 I p 1 ~
~ ~ ~ BEARING-- i - fah. ~ ` , ,G ~ ~ CONS 6,iRA~F^~ 1. i. - ~".a yf ~ ~ r~ I ~rY\• ~.`tA!^ iJUCTIpN BOk'~~ I 1 ' ~,i,i~. ~aJ3' ,~i 7c.w f~ rr
~ 8 8 ~ - ? , ? • .CONNE T Elld~. HDPE `d,°;'~ 1 , E>~ .~~r 'I,i r S' t,~, i - _ - A\.~, A BRIM 4161,7 415 - r ~ `-END NOQE '~~P,~ { $ ' n ~ $ 9_ I - ~ _ "`,,i I, .2{t' I ref ~ ~7s \ ` O z
] ~ a d~ _ ".V ,,p ~'Y ~ ! 'BEGI 24 R i.'. i 4~e h y~' IiA s s s~ G~~-- - "J'", FL E 2 ~ .E ~'^464.18 f I ' L.A>`: , A„ ' ' I 4 \r e CORNER ~ Q N 20758.08 Co _•I ~ E 11072.01 IL
FL. 24' ~'~464, 10 t ~ F I I I , \ y I I ~.STA~-.O+TtO«00-L-fHE A-40 ~ - ~i ~ ,5~~ i1' fl N 20699.E ~ _ t I { I ~ 1 N !;'~w, -`~,y? `.,1~,'}~~t,; ~ , I•xON5i~Y2' SLOPING NEADWALL `.1 4. 'i ~ ,I I Vii: E 9969.68. - ' 1 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ . ` \
i ~?I v -t--. ' N/ ROCK EROSION PROTECTION ' r a' , I ~ ~ t , , ~ f.' 1 l Q<
N 20643.94 ! J; i. ? .'.9,~`,j' 1 I { I I^' '.~3i 'rl' ~ ' I C_'E ^96+0: ~ ~ ~ 1 r ~ : ~ - t o cr w
6 S 0". i.. ?i?I, ~ I . ~ I II I ' i I fp_a_.,_, ~ , ~}n}~l /-~~;..~1~~-~, aC
~ F o & _ _ , ~ f I ~ o ~ R '.4., _,.LINE-A 40,E-__ ~,i .+,'r` IP € i ( ~~(.a i,il" ~ I ~ ~ ~ i '1 ~ $ ~ L-__-~~- -'y2'TtCP'°_~-- ~i,,.ll I' I.' ~ "J. ..'1.' t I 71 I I ~ i l .1 ! 1, \ e CORNER Q A N 20662.62 E 11101.88
, ~ ~ ~ _ :-i/iY d ~y 1' li' ..oa.~ {_~L._.____..._i I I {I I VI I '~4 ` 5 ^ ~ T+~'It~"
I ' ' 8 ~ ~ - a" ,~R--~-^, 1 : ~ 6" SS N ii , ~ 1. T . swt~iwu° Y 1 tvt, A ~ ~ ~ ~a._ - ,~z -g - -s
S ~ _ _ ~ - - - I i' ~p I' I I I i p V I I I , I ! ,I~,°,. ~ n s e b 'i Ij~ 2; 1, l~ I I I t I I i I ,r I ~ i I 7 ~1' I ~i'I 1,
"x "x Y I fi ~ ( p i - X1„1._._._._._._._ _ _._._.~._._._._.t._._ B i 'I I I ~ I i I i I I 1 I € ; ~'I~ ? ! ^;I I
~ 3 ~ 3 ~ f, A 3 :~2 LIHE A-40 1~ ~ 11 1 ' I ' ti.. ~ 1'.~• _ ~ ~ ~ ~ I ~ l NE{k 40 'I, i ;LUAB [NLET ~ I• - i I i I 1 ~ I I I I I I i rir '`,~1' 1 rte-} '•4~, r 1 CORNER N 20565.84 (1 - i~/y E 11127.25
~ ~ ~ ~ VIr ~ ~P O[ u4 Er • 465.50 ~ i; I I 1 I i 7 I ! I ~ I . ' ; ~ ~ § TOP OF SLOTTED VANE ~y R. ~ I~ -i I'; I I _ I I I _ ! ! I ' i _i \ ~ - c c,\,
DRAIN = 473.00 TR ~fl',,..~AR~~N GIN p - - - - , I 'END IB' PVC y/-- ~ ' FL 42',' 4,69. it ~ I~ ~ I i _ I I 1 ~R~ G~~~S I ~-i I I ~ - 1 35° 00'00„
~ ~ Y ~ SLOTTED YANEiDRAIN.----~-'~ ~ Fl 3 ~ S.i;~ ~ ; i i' , I ~ _ - ' ~ ~ ~ g !i 8 x 8' 70.03' N 206'7. I ~ ~ , I ~ i 3 , I I ~ AI'iEA pr I ' I ~ I - ~ . 1 400^^.^ i I - y N 204 ° E 9618 r ~ l I 9 I i i I i S TRUE NORTH PLAN
~ ~g I E %79.91 + ` A ~1 .OO'LINE A-50 - 1 I' y , ~ , ~ I' FF EL. 480.65 ; ~ ; I,~ ' 'e6 i i( pP"OF SLOTTED VAN _ yf _.1.. _._L- _ - ._.1._.~'._. _._.L._.,-'-'---._.~._;_. _ _ - , o ~CCIR` - t NORTH
Y_ E~!19'~vCN/ I ,1' ,I,,.I E I I I I € 1 I I I ! _ P ------~~P. Z~~ ~ _ 90TTED MANE DRAIN ' 7' ( - _ +'T 1i ' II --E, I1146-5 Wv 52
I ',A f,~9 I I I I r 1 I I i ~s I 1 I i ~p i6' + 470.25 1 , I ~ 1 _ A 40 .~_l, ~ CIF { i 1 ~ _ 'C1 N~ _ _ 8=x0444.42 7 _ I , ~ I ! { I % 1 I 1 I 1 1 I - - - I - , n
.uC:YASCDTTEO ' I I { ' ' , Y - A ~--"`y
^ . , 1y ~A. j E I I I I I{ I ~ I 1 !i' ~~ia ~ ~~,1 A ~ . , A. r b0 N A a ~9 i ~'I 1 1 l I I! I E I I I 1 I' i ;~7o-s 1 l e CORNER
I _LON55. 36'X66' GRATE INLET ,e,,i~ t , Qlr I I ; ~ R`+A 1 , ~ ~ ~ $ RE,I L'~J7O4,53 ~e ~1' N~ A 50~ hT•{ ~;;I I 7; 1 I I ~ t I I I '+1 I', - ~ ~ ~ N ?A368 E
K E 1 TOP OF GRATE ='A72a0-. - fi ~:~I~' PVC NI SLOTTED "T~' . i ~ I , IJ,f iy Et ' ' ~ ENO30'ACP _i. ~{_._._.}._._.-}---._.~._.._.~._._..1..~, -'-f~-•-'-i---~---F--.~_._}-'-'--{•--._._r.._._.--1-1,---• € ~ ~.'.I~,~ I (S `s. `YANG DRAIN - s , r { S J r `y) ~ lit
I SLOTTED VANE DRAIN ~ i 1, I ~ { I I ~ f ( i I I ! ~ ~ A FL 30' =466.51 / ~ ~ I i " i I { i I I 1 I ! :'s `1i.
~ ~ ~ I -_-_FL 18' - 469.75 1A-401 , ~ { t''; ! ~ ' y ~ ; ~ ~ ~ FL'18'~~g69.iS IA-501 ' ~ ~ ~,i 'I, I f i I ! TT i I I I I ~ ' ~ ; ~•7 , , , . ~s r '7"" i i® u V a
6 _ o N20444.SI~ ~ ~ ' 3 - : I E 9752.% ~ E k a lII ~ a~ _ ~ .j-~i A i~-~~ y~."'_~_r_ J __.'f--~ _r --_"j."_ __j-__~'a"_.-(~__ ` f+ i Y - .i. .i.~w~. 1~~~.~.-.~.-i .i.'>.~.~,~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~j~...i.~.~.r.~.~.r..~.~.~.1.~.~.~J~ ....J. .~.i~. .L.. .1.1 ._._Y:rF_. _.._._.0 50 100 150 200
MATCH LINE RED C4.34 GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET
uc o `i;e j ~ -
~ ~ gi pi o ~ i 3 a n°
y ~ e rr r
y'c~ ~ ? ~ a ~_._..a._._.1 SHEET
a 1 AREA 2 -STORM DRAIN PLAN KEY PLAN C4.3 2
RC u na a C4, 32 SCALE: 1'=50'
0 ~;:b?
~~orc Copyright © 2004 by Carter & Burgess,Inc.

f•-•-•-•-• - - + f- „ MATCH LINE AE: C4.32
- ~ ~ f ~ -._.i'._.-.'L_•- _.i_._.-..~.-.-.- ~.~r- - ~ ~ - • ~ . . i _ • r _ _ M 41
, ~ - { _ --.r _ • R j ~ ' -0 _ BENCH MARKS: r -i.4.__. .
tS` ~ ?u: ~f 4 I iiil I _i" ! ' -7 I 'I\k j'~^~, ~i .\t„ 1 ~ ~ t~S a4~s> I I I I I I ~ I i 1 I ' , i i : ~ ~ ~ Op r ~ eSq I - 1 1 I ~ 1 t i 1 1 k 1 r ( r' I : ~ ~ ~ ~ j~~` mss' i! 1 11 J N 21102.21 0 - N CORD E 9622. 15 N 269.'. q 2 ' 20 0 ELEVATION 488.78
/ Fs r , ~ 6 ~ ~T. ? ~"/(a ~ _y I Ii 1 ~ i, I I I I ' e :E ~:'~r.,~ i ~ 1 ~ '~~d0 ~ °J `7 : j, ~S~A.`H6i.99LI~E`,A-JO ~ f I I I I, 1 rr I ir1 ~ ~Ip:~ \ / 'i'f': ~~},F I` ' 111TD",0 1 '+1 3~ t~1';1,t~ Fin 2. TBN - CAP 9. 5A IRON ROD WITH CAP
i ~ I ilk ~ ;~a 4p~ ~'u -"I'~4'~NCP-~-•-s--•-.._. L.__1._i__. _._.I-._.F~ ~.-•---~-~---.1'~---•-~---'-'~`--. ~.r._. _,`_.1E• a Z ; 3 ~ ;':'I~: d,!`': ; Ir N 20977.38 . ~r=ii' ` 11`~ 1~'.m E 10436.94 ELEVATION 490.84
$ y o PS ~rl ~ ~~~i: N ~ 469.4 ) I ( J I I , ~ 1 , ~ : , ~v E I . n ~,-fh., ° tM 0~17.nJ ~ t, ~ ,ll I I I ww'~ ~ ~~~1 pub ~ r` 1 ~ F ~ A' t ~PVC6 "5 €1 E t i `f4 ~b9, 6Y 1 e I l ~ w:r~~v F• i Y ' ~1~ 'a':: D ~ ~ I a • I ~'ana r .d- I I ~ I I ( I erne' 11 1 ~ a; `E~ .I 1 3. TON - CAP II, 5i9' IRON ROD WITH CAP I~t
u .1 m .o : ~ is i i i i i. DRIB GOODS ~ ~ ;~,;I. ~i l4 al ma - - S y ~ ~ ~ o ! ! I V'r I ,r i i Q ~ ~ ~ A I :':I' N 20222.19 iE~I, ~1.a~ Irr N 2ORNE4t 1 E 11115.25 r .1. rrli E 10 694, 1 ELEVATION 477.97
~ ~ ~ _ I rsq _ - -c`~-~-~ A~E~~~-;-._.1,_._.=l_._._.L._.~`-1•---•--~ ' '''I~ ;1 ~ ~ s} I Sz el § I s ~~~1 ~ _ I 1 I 1 : F Q. 480.'65 ~ 1 1 1 i ~ ~ .=I~ BMSI BENCHMARK INFORMATION FROM SURVEY
,r _ . : ;i;, ~i" 'rlt, AT NCGS MONUMENT 'VANCO' ,1`=,'!r N 23021.07. E 11203.26
£ ~ ~ ~ I~ _ , ear t; l + } ELEVATION 513.07 .i IIa ~3:Ii .,y_j N
~ ~ -r. E- - 9~ ` - - _ - ~y _ - ~ i 1 ~gQ 3 i `,I I ( ~ s ~ F- 4 { ~ F' f ~ tl i~
~ F~ D.t i :E C _ _ I ' _ _ _ t i ORNER
~ , ~ ~ ~ i ~ t2) ( f ~ I' I I 1 t ~ 1' .a ~r N 20069.27 - -.I; 1J80.09 sr l . , ~,~p ~ L.
¦¢Q s sS I! ( <.c. - -1'-._._..-._ ~ 'i'fs : i._ Ytl i_ 1. _ _ _ ~ / . ~ ~ I
I 1 F r =Y~_ I --I ~ I k ~ II I 1; 41 I ~~G 1 ~~,i V I ~"'~T[ 'd ~ 1J , ~ ~ r 'r 11 `'fry ?r~. , t ' 14, 4,4
. ,....'~I ~ . _ ~d jrrT~' Ir' J I '1 f ,~trt ~r
I I I I I I ~SpC i Y l~ ~i ~ i 1 N'CORNQ2 ,r 19969.27 °
9 i I 1 ( 1 ~ I I ~~r, iry 8A ~ ~ ~ a s.-- ',1,,,.~''r ~ , 'frr,'i • ~ E t 1183.49 `1
d ~ i 1 I ~ T~~ ~_~_Y. t- ~4 b .x5 r , i , ~y~ _ _ r,+ I I +r
s'ds 4 ; ( ~ 1. .I_ ~9 1 i~._L. in!- ~r ~1 ! ~ ~ . ~ 4d / V, ~v Yc' ~r . 9r'-~ • i'r
P A r-. 1 k ' 1 I F- lY I 1 4i - r [ I
s I ~ ~ ~ d - ~ t ~ t ff CORNER 1,- { N 19846.72 fN T67.92
~ ~ ~ s ml ~ --.~..._._.I_. ---.-I_._.--- ._f._._._ ( b ,A- I I f?1 •r7rS.'r'~, ~ - M' - - - I- I I °yj b mar -
UI ~ I ~ . ul,:~+h ~ _ a P ~ '-&•C°ORN~R'=- _ q Tq' . : :>g q o 'A
1 r ~ 3= , a - i F °i-I- ° ~'"i:` _ X w19Bd8r8L _ 306. - _ _ _~~~RJ ER~1TJ N a ~~A A , r1,,:: ;r -r:-':=:~ J• Y !t Y u7r, 1 'PH ~s-y,_, 'e s ~ I i a 1 1:~::1~ ,;r,,;~::~~l~b 1~-=~'--ses° '1o•M .06.74' 1 a° .e ~ Y 3E 8 4' 10'W J S 81
~ ~ x q 1 Cam, C~ I C~° ! y1r ~ ~ ~ r/,.,i~r-r- . . I i i ARAB ~ a ~ L; ' _ ' ~ a :i„ r„~ r, ~ : # WI I I E ~ ;~i -,~,~,'S6 C5 9~:~~1~ '~t', ,I,:,:hr„ ~ ~ . Syr
~I ~ I,, ; I : I Y. 5_ S.. ~ ( , I . ~N 2 4{ Z O
I 1 ' f I 1 ( j! ~I~~It I r F I II~ ~t ? =I I I ~ / I ! (~(~t] L' / -f ~ ~t~]I~ ~ ~ 1 ~i~ ~ J/ ern' \ N CD 0
I i i i ~ - ~ • ~ ASS Cli' ;;ii I ~ ~ ~ ~ ; a Qra---.a._._._._._._:_ i Q ING b b 4~:~t3 'i I' ~ '~i' N CORNER Z z w Ii - I ¢ E 11192.34 ag Q
~I ~ ! IRE I I - ! ~~a' ~ ~ ~ ,~l~I; ~i ~ ; I IR ~ ~
9 4 a 7 t,, ,I ;~n I I ~ i. V U ::~1: ~ -l °42'}2'E ` 296:TI'~~~- t'f J X O N. W c) ~42. 32'E t~ W W
a a W O 0
~ I d ~ ~ : i j' ~ ~ ` i~ E 1898.02 s ~ _ _ ~ ~ t.,_1 - - ~ . CORNE0 (0 3 Z IN 19~24R37 ` 1rn w
j ~ d8 ~ Ij ~i., ~ ,alt / - ~ ti I1 95.95 U 0
/i~,. i v - $ d - r ' _
3~ ~ : ~ I----°____ 3-~', / I ,.`,~_I ,.-fat _ /t ~ ~
& x g ~ ~ - ! I - _ a moo. : , ~ : 1 1 - di0 - t _ _
~ ~ 4 I _ t : ; , ' ~ _ cr OZ
a a e~ I ~ i -f f I` : , i , ' 4I¢s I, : t „;i Q
• ~ ~ , ~ , I. i ir~l~ , :ra-eravro , 1 I ~ _ - : j! CO J
' I ~ ? ~ I I - _ _ e ~ :r ~ `Y ~ ' - - Qir
~ I - ;0 « , r, W 0 cr
r~ f'~~ ~ ='T w-ry i n ~ - _ , ~ _ , Q
. _ ~ E= _ - - - 1r1 -
~ ~ ~ i `~I,,
-
3f s ~ ~ j ;II LIB j _ 5
d ~ !i ~ ~ ~ I , - ~ o P _.IfA ~ ~t _ ' '
: P
.a !Is,,,, 1 35° 00'00"
a afj a,11j~ : : :~y(I', t.' : 1 ~ i i~ s~ s4 f4 I I~~;I~ "r! i r JJJIII AA ' 1 I 1 fjll ~ 1 , ' _ , ~ , ' i PLAN TRUE NORTH y NORTH
! , r I , : z r ~ ' ~ i' 3 i 6 { ~i i W~
: ` I ~ : I 3 . 'i i 3 AEI r ~ ,f ~ J, 1 1 :..I I i t V g ~ Y y a F r
tll 4 i ~ ' I. :t 1 \ ~ 4~ Y N LL m 1y
''~i ~ t -LI I+t ~ t : , , ~ m s t i P m
, ~-'----°°-'3 i. Ln C =g
~ ~ ~ ' i~~ / g ~ oV~~n
E x , o a
3~a - ~ u°u
- I ~J i r 1
~~~N a._ , i `-r ~ , ~ ~ ~ o . f CORxt'R 0 50 100 150 200
sm a I . ii'~ f / X 19416.84 ° ~ I 9JJ.3J' ~ ~r,,/ E 99J5.58 GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET
- 25'E ~ ~S N.90°DO'DO'1r J 59.67' 1 r~ 4-21
~ ~ 1 ; P CORNER - ~ y-OO F ! t] 16974,94
i~ i i 01 ~ y'' / ~ ~ n z
n4 ~ 1 AREA 4 -STORM DRAIN PLAN SHEET
C4.34 SCALE: I'=50' ~~mo KEY PLAN C4.3 4

Copyright © 2004 by Corter & Burgess, inc.

_ _~A _ ~ .
_ -r-.. __...r.._..__ _ _ - _ -
..._..V- ._2~iV-..... _..._a._..-.. -._-a__.__ _ _ - t V- _0.~-4w0 ._._..._.C.. - - _ ._u-...h_..n e, .__._r_. -y - - - - -
£ 4 a. a . ~--a .....-..._.i.. X... _ r ?C. .._.a __...-r- _....._..r-_.._... ._.....i.-_... ~ ~ ~ _ _ _ Ll.__.....1 ~ • _ ..,.-a~._.. - _ _ - _ - O N
.w . _ _ rr _ ' FE + Sri-a...e+_ _ . _ r _ _....r-_..._.._ t. __..__.a...-,
__..,s a _ _ - _ .--ti-_ ...........y._.__. a~~. _ pZ ti-._... _ _ _ +p-.... _ _ ..i.. Z rr
_ -u.: a p 1 ...._-t..__ _....._a-......_.. - - U _
9 - _ _ - - - - - - - - - - - ~ _ - - - - - - - : x:61}._ . - - - - - . _ _ -r_ _ ---T_._...........__._ _ - - - - . _ ................_..._.:....__.........__..:......_..._....:::-4 -
- - - --r - - . 7~tA0E.. . ~ _ _ .
FFNt51fE ~BRABF - -.._r - - - - _ - - - T _ _ _ W=E
- _ . - 4.Z~ - - - - - . - 4- - - - _~~r:. _ T.
r---- - _ - - -
. ~ _ ....:r._ ~ ...1 -u_ e ~ ~ N . - - _ .--.s--.-.~ _ ----rr---__._. _ - - - - - -
_ _ T - TR Y.S.- - =14 - - --'f' - - - - - _ 183:331 AE~..~ - - _ - - - - - - - - - ---i--- - _
- 4 _ _ :;K~ 465.-.._-- . p ya_...pGP=, _ - _ - - - _ - - _ - - - - - • _ ~ - _ --r-- - - - - - - - ~ - . - - ::-~fi5_ . _ - _ - - _ _ - - - ---:is3~ F ors ~e f~ o: .asaa..i:..G:-:oja :St.. wa.. IAK:... _i:1:µ.:_-
- - • ----w- - - - _ E11}SEfNS =i.:. _ _ [ ~J rr

- - - _ . - - - _ 460 _ - - - - - - - - _ _ _ - - _:9fi0 - - - - - - - - --ate Aa~xfr. - _r_ _ . _ t-- I= HE - g „
4.6#} - - w - - _
T_ v-'- _ _ ~ - - -
4 - - - - - - - - - - - - - _ 55.__....-. __.._a.._..--- _ _ - - _ - - _ r~ e _ _ • - - - _ - _ _a5~ . _ _ - - - - - - - _ - - - - - _ ._n _ _ . : _ _ ~ _ _ : _ - - - - - - - - - _ _ . . i - - - _ . - _ - ..f q . -N - _ ~.r _ _ _ ~ _ _ - _ 0 a..........~ ................._o..: ....IF......
_ _ - _ _ _ _ e._ SOY
. . . X4 _ - - - - N _ 11 s.. - - - - r _ _ _ --1? . _ _ _ _ -T ..............._.__.a.. - - _ _ - _ n .1D__....i.__ ............._I,D..i..._.._. - - _ is ~6p Oo
.V _ - _ - _ . _._r__.. _
QO . ~ _ _ . _ Q 0A - . ~ _ - - Q~+ - - _ a-- - ~ - - ~ - - - - - - - - y
- _ . _ ~ - - _ - ~ . - _ _ _ - _.........-....____-.c ......_....__a......_....... . _

~ Z
............._...i..........._.................n . d xZ ..._..........a....___ ...............ri............... _ - -
._.__.......e...._.._.._..........._...:......__ -
..............c..._.....-......._...HT EE
_ ............__......_.........._...........r......._..._....__....._i......._..._... _ . . .........._...'s . .
. o.+ ~ ~ - - - _ - ~ - _ _ - - - - - - _ _ - ALl_.. ~ - _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ - yy11 co ......_.......:......_........_......._.._......._..........._._.._.i........... ..........i...._.._.... z 3 .
F" _ _ _z.._ _.Z__,- - ao -,ps__ _ _ _ _ - - - - _ _ U
a .
_ ry, _ _ - - - - - - w ~ _ .r. _ - - - - -
No,a.,o _ - _ _ - _ _ _ _ y_ _ _ _ _ ~ _ _
. . _ Pj . ................................e....._..._... - - '
_
_ - _ ea - - - - - _ - _ - - - - - - 4:9#?..:_ --_460:_:_- ILL C> C>
M ~p
_.._.._i.__......__._......__..........._ _.__i..__......._ ....._...I...._....._...._...._........_ z a
-9 ~5 _ _ _ _ _ . - - - _ ' - _ - - - - - - _ _-935.- -9~
n _ EXtST GiE'1flF - - _ - - - - - - - . CC U-) _ ' - ....i....__.....
_ - - - - - - - _ - ~ 9:x:0 ~ _ - - - - - - - - - - _ _ Q - - -~~4-_ - - - _ - ;~o xa - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - A..._ _ - 27 ao iar -c ,rte - _ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
-sturTfo- ANE- tN-- _ - _ _ . ~ - . J
_ - IU*vR. - - - - ~ _ _ - - . . _4E`35 _ - - _ _ - - -
i - _ _ - - - _ - ~ - - _ _ _ _ - - - - - _ J $ . . - - - - -
.V ~ _....4.6{3 - - - - - _ - - - - - - - - - - - - -
_46.Q_._.__ 46.0_ _ . - - „ _ 3 -r . _ . _ _ - _ - - _ _ _ - _ _
r r__ - - - - - - - - er. - - - _ _ - _ - _ _ - _ . _ _ - . . . _ T-
. . _ inm ~ - ~ - - ' - - - - - . _.955 _ _ - - - - - - - - - - 4 _ _ 55_. r 4-- - 55-- - - -
_ ~ ~ - . . . ....r - - - _ - - _ _ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - _y.. _ _ - - - -:..._..........__..-......i...................
r, _ _ _ _ - r... T ,a . _ mom - _ - _ _ - - - - _ . _ - - v. _ ..n- - _ _ - _ _ _ _ - _ _ - -
. _ _ .r-___.. o. ~ _ _ _ _ _ - .........:.a W a ..:............................._i-.........._.
......................i......._......
0 - • - _ - _ - - - - r, - ;~N~.-.k ~ w._ _ - - - - - - - _ - _ - - - - - - - _ - - - -
6fl::_ - _ ~ m $ - - - - _ - - - - - - - s _ - . - - - - - - - - - R c _ro- _ - _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ V o......'--_ ......._...i..._._._....... _ _ dim i
d _ _ - . _...w-- - - - _ _ _ AExCx NaxAS: BENCH MARKS: ° C e
- 8 - . _ . _ - _ . - - - - . - - - - - - - - - - - - - _ - - - - - - - . - - . _ ' - 1. TOM - CAP 8 o` U
~ 3 . : - - - - - m x - _ . - ELEVATION 488.78 - p 2. TOM - CAP 9 ?
_ _ k - _ - _ _ - - - • - w - - - - - C _ . _ _ _ w - _ - - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ r_i w - - _ _ _ _ - ELEVATION 490.84 V u°
: _ s - - - - a -i--_ _ - - - - - - - - - - - E~EVAna 9 _ _ _ _ 3. TBM - co II ELEVATION 477.97.
_ . A~a h " ~ _ - - - - ' _ : a _ - - - - - _ - - - - - - 4. BENCHMARK NCGS MONUMENT 'VANCO'
.m o _ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - _ on ~ - - _ - - - - - - - - _ - - _ _ - - ~ - ELEVATION 513.07
in - . - - - - q
8 ~ - _ _ - _ _ -
_ ¢p ~ _ _ _ (J _ . _ _ - - _ - - _ - SCALE r. - SCALE NOTE: UTILITY CROSSINGS ARE
_ , . . . _ . -.r. r.._. ..O U - - - - - - - - - _ _ _ _ _ _ .a-.. G .___..i-. _..-r.._.._ __..ti _ - _ ti. - » _ _ 1' 50' HORIZ. SHOWN FOR HORIZONTAL SHEET REFERENCE. VERTICAL 1' 5' VERT. LOCATIONS ARE APPROXIMATE
r.. _ _ b ~ - . r _ - - - _ - - - - . - - - _ ___i -_.N___ ._v _ _ _ _ _ In,- ~ .ti _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ - _ _ - - _ _ _ _ _ _ N _ _ i T _ EXCEPT WHERE NOTED. .41
. y _ . __i G/~/ 3500 _
Copyright © 2004 by Carter & Burgess,Inc.

CENTER SIPPOAT BE1 REOUTAED FOR 20' 1 CENTER SUPPORT BEAM ~~~„NUary••w REQUIRED FOR 20' INLETS
- CAST IRON FAANE AND COVER " RE!-Fx/G~,flL.-__- - _ _aE7NNNkYS2&,-0ILEOUAL.----- rr__---** - 6.orr d fi . _ -
- , 1 _ iY0 REOUTAEO fOA 10' d IS' u _ . _ INLET Y . „ i i ( REFER TO STORM DRAIN aw PLANS FOR COORDINATE POINT
FINISHEO CRAOE PLANS Fpl C I AT BOC I AT BOC 0 r•• I
12' PIPE OD 12' ~ N ~ MIN. NIN i ~ `r5 BAAS I ~5 BA I 05 BARS --I- r„• 1
COMPACTED SOIL I!! ' ~ I I I
PER SPECIFICATION ~ 'Yr ~ ~ ' I Il ~ BACK N , I I I ,
~ V TRENCH BACKf ILL OF CURB ~ , I a ~ I ' I- , I ' 1
> - _ , = SELECT BACKFILL APPROVED i TAENLN EKCAVATIgI MATERIAL ~ = 6' 1
COMPACTED TO 98X tA31W 01557) I - N IN NAK. 8' LIFTS. /'TRANSITION i0 10' Wi 20' 10' OR 20' OPENING 6• 4'TRANSITION TO 12• REFER TO STORK DRAIN PLANS DEPRESSED GUTTER
N 12' DEPRESSED GUTTER ~ AEfER TO S7 VARIES z I 0 I 6•
N N V W Z
Dip. IINOISr11RBEO sou 5 4 4
~ m C4, 51 04,51 •o ~ C4.51
~ ~ P BEDDING MA1EAlAL CdPACTEO PIPE SUBCRAOE, °o •Q TD 9B~TIASTM D1557) IN MAK. 3 CU~ B I N L E T CA.51 STABILIZATION o ,0 6 LI S. 1RB INLET
NATEAIAL IF 6~ 6~ ~ C4.31 NOT TD SCALE AEOUIRED 4'MINIMLN O Op' Op' Dp Dp Op TO SCALE
DETAIL NOTES ° PIPE suecaADE Ca, 32 12:5 GUTTER-CURB NORMAL GUTTER 8' ~ a H ELDIFFERENCE AT LINE
I. ALL CONSTRUCTION, INSPECTION AND MONITORING SHALL COKPLY ~ ~ \ WITH ALL OSHA, STATE AND LOCAL OAOINdNCES, LAMS bN0 NOAMAL GUTTEA PROCEDURES. TNIS SMALL INCLIHIE ALL CONSTRUCTION METHODS, LINE FACE OF CURB. 3/4' EXPANSION JOINT
MATERIALS AND SAFETY PROCEDIAES. AOOITIONAL TRENCH GVTTEA TOP OF CURB SAFETY, INSPECTION AND MONITORING SHALL BE DESIGNED IIRF
ANO FURNISHED BY iNE CONTRACTOR AS REOUIREO BY OSHA, STATE AND LOCAL OADINdNCES, LAWS ANO PROCEDURES. - e
ENCHING DETAIL - - 1 TR 2 BEDDING ZONE ,'TRANSITION TO ' - 4'TRANSITION TO _ DEPRESSED GUTTER °z
- NOT TD SCALE DEPRESSED GUTTER C4.51 NDT TO SCALE
4 ELEVATION LEVATION°m ° Lit IT TO SCALE
C4.51 NOT TO SCALE
~1 BARS AT 6'
C-C 80TH MAYS FINISHED p 6'4 z
5•~ GRADE IIr7• CLR TYP, 3.R 2-~S T/1' CL. I N TYP. ~pz -r{ saws ncrs. Z 0 Oi
_ s.~ I ~ EACH COANFA ~OyO I~ sln• I - I. ~ p =111_111_ ~ =o~~> z U ~3 o~' z Z Z
B• ' ~ i omz ~ , D , .~""~y,' ;1{i MANHOLE TO BE FLUSH ~ i z~OpO N x x ` aOW Z
Z 1 ~ ~ y WITH FINISHED CRAOE ~ ~m J I G• ,I. .I OD ACP PIPE »n k -J-~-I o o a x O zoo W C/)
o:w ` B' THICK MALL AT , ~p § ~ °d ° CENTER LINE 1 z GOWEL'C x I` , . , NEL•C w a ' r
a:zo I I 'NIN M1 `'A ~ / aoa s51 12' OCEW 3 1 > r a ~ _ ° 0) W PLAN N O Z
nOZ VI y'. ----l-.l-, _i ` ~ MNRKME ^I `a I ~ R, INVERT SHAPING , ~ , °PfM"dT sm' ° ~ ~ ~5 HODP AAOI#tD C'P• (CONCRETE FILL( ~ ~ ' F~o7 a~ru+o 7 w (WITHOIJPTOP( (Q W SEE STMDARD M054 I eRlac MAY BE USED ro O
w~ OPENING I MIN. ~ ' ~ ~1NF°R"°b" ~ 21/CP.NN15 HoOX I. FOR 1.LWHM BE USED FRAME FWSH GRADE A WFRAME 6COVER Q
~ J@ i I xOR12 AMO m ~p~A so ~5 ! 12' OCEW ~ I YFAT PALL p D ~ ' q, C,p AEIIF. EACH z 9 m PLAN OF TOP SlA6 ro SURFACE EIEVA "MAX 1RS Tor SI.a m LL
510E OF N = ~ M BARS m >F e ~".L _T.> OPENING, TYP. mAx p y rY BAA DIMENLONB PRE OUTro Wf ARE OUT TO OUT T.d s• aAxS a Q w
EOx ~ I~ T Do-v Z V = '.v 3Q ? °
N=~ 77
NQ~ N';
PEKING ~ ~ A ~ 7 WALL 0 a ~ . °Z0- '•:v j , aNErtKNOTTs Q = CO
TER SUPPORT BEAM FOR ~^•51 REINFORCING DETAIL z _ n ~ 5 SECTION 6 CEN NOT TO SCALE ~ ~ p I' ~ ~ g i =mom W . 'a . MKS SHO" v 3 INSETFOR U ES TKTRYH V V N O
ca.sl NOT TO SCALE C451 15' INLETS AZA DOWEL'C Z Y. w N6 o z
A ~ ~ 6'd' i ^I NOT TO SC LE p INSEf'A' PIPM OFOF B0~- corvtRETEeLOCK ~y T ISET'A• a O Q
NOTES coNSmuc~sECRa+'B'C~TMEPROrosEDwnus~>Hla. CRETE BLOCK r-'r W
NVD SELMIN'A' P DUCK NOTE 2 IF PROPOSED STRUCTURE EXCEEDS Q4 VERTICAL HEIGHTA DESIGN MWI gE REOUNND FOR ppPROVAL s w • ra+pspMr EEr
N01E USE SINGLE MAi RLINFORCMG STEEL; EEi ¢F2 ~Iµd~E~YBE UEEDN UEU ~ 840.34 CONCRETE BOTTOM sea S ITOPIx X 840.34 C/) O
a NCDOT JUNCTION B( 04.32 NOT TO SCALE NCT I ON BOX DETAIL CD
0 om
oz a-a Damp zF3 a S01 z~av~ D~xU r7 IFS SOLID COVER SHOWN PERFORATED. PERFORATED AVAILABLE IF SPECIFIED.
~~~x$ O Dui Am I 'n w~~n== '^OZ ILE STATE USE OF SYSTEM ON COVER (I.E.: SEWER. STORM DRAIN, ELECTRICAL) Z c 4
znO~Om la-xzd0~ nZZ>A`~ ~ nxA~ '^~~z~ m O~=U TOP OF COVER p O S Z
Day GENERAL NOIES~. BILL OF MATERIAL ZOOS =~g(((px1~T~ rA. lOPO NZ USE STPNDARD OR JUMBO BRICK FOR WAlI, CONSIRUQION. SOUD E.5 ZO-A~Om A $ A w = A B B N=how ~2 z~
CONCRETE BRICK OR BLOCK PRE OPRONALWAll LONSIRUCf10N MAIERW. p n x AA Wt Ott. SIZE DW !1711 p A e is t2 A] <D" Z °a°~ Yl
PRECAST UNRS MADE aF CIASS'M' CONCRETE MAY BE USED IN UEU 0> OF BRICK MASONRY CONIR'uCIION. SUBMR OE5IGIJ OF PRECAST UNNS B M Y5 98' BpJ M+Z FOR APPROVAL PRIORTO CONSTRUCTION. c a ra r.Y nI w n ee cts ao V E ° cN
INCLUDE AlLAD1USTMEN'RTO WAl18, SLT&S OR REINFORCING MAIERL^t nEFlroruwElcln Dsa IN THE UNR PRICE BID FOR EACH UNIT. N R' vv o m o cn~~ BOTTOM OF COVER a? r R. u S _
~ QI.iM. GA6'M'CCNC. 2~+ O m MSTALL OPTIONAL MANHIXE IN POBUION AS DIRECTED BYTHE ENGINEER w. ~ ems. w. MN 0 a ~ m CUTOR BENDAll REBAR CROESINGIHIS OPENWGro ALLOW?MINIMUM Lv mLL dm U
CONCRETE COVERAGE ENCLOSE THE OPEMNG WITH K'A' BMSHED ro cu. rox Necurr. HE ¢ oa m c , Z 101HE RE9AR MAT PNDSET SrJ AMINIMUM OFSCONCREIE COVER IS A ~ ATTNNED, RFFERENCE 51D. N0.890.54 FOR MANHOTf INFCRMAHON. Q Z w m O o OI `0 3 . u'. PLAN OF COVER p~ i= z a a W m co au LL
E m N PRO~DEiurvcnoneo~swnHMnHNaESOVeRre•InDEPIHwmi z z PIANOFFRAME xyD z ~ m STEPS %ACED OV 7 CENTERS. REFERENCE STD. N0. S~.fiB. > ® SEE C O ~L 4
Q~o m Z p SPACE DOWEL'C BARS ATA MAXIMUM OF T7CEN1ER5. Z = v~ z a = O - atp:_n v U ~ ~ -cFUaf.. °a
n N A MAIOMUM DEFM OF THIS UNA f55HOWN IS R. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 2•p' N C7 y- O CIXJSIRULTTNE IUIVCTION 80K IN A(xARDANCE WITH ~ pn m D Z Q c 3 eZ ~ v a o W v
.E Z C > SECTIONS 830.832, 834AND B400FTHE StANDARD SPECIFICAlI0N8. a w Z 1'~ M p 'f. d w Oy 8 oZf 0 M1b0'
` C Z ~n W~ o~o Nm3 ~x i TWE#I °car VV TYPE #I 2
~ ~ AZ° Dz ~ ~ ~T T- -•'1 F-- w L "I RM n ~I wt -4 4 - 40' I = _
y m waQs po I ° ° k F~ AA ~ ~ IK n c U ~
~ Q ~ ~ ~`AITERNATE S ~ ~ ~ - ALTERNATE SECTION B•B w a
A ~ 4Y 2AY ~ b ~ - zvr MINIMUM WEICFIIS • LBS. c FRAME tlO = COVER UO
d ; ~ 5 HEF x+2 I $ ~ ~ °F : 840,34 sECnoN A•A L TOTAL. 700 z
840.34 ~ _ / SPECIFICATION / CLASS 301RON MEETING HEEf TOR SHEET ~ ASTM A-4
ED UT I TYPE #2 8 o ~ 840.54 TYPE r2 840.54
~ ~ 9 NCDOT JUNCTION BOX NOTES C4.51 c
a~ cA,32 Nor TD scALE NHOLE FRAME , ~4 ~ t0 MA OLE FRAME AND COVER 3 :ALE
n~ ~ fA,SO NOT TO SCALE " 'o Copyright © 2004 by Carter & Burgess,[no.
is~~ ~~ioa

VARIES 5' OR 10' VARIES 1 ~ 'OE' JOTNT
W M ^ o.
GAAOE BREAK CPH ,x - CPY ( ~ IS° iYP. itl~ FROM i
S 6' CURB tP~ 2= CUTS
FENCE FABAfC I 6• t0 I FC 2' -6' R I
IiYP.I I 12' CURB n VARIES
TENSION MIRE I 3 ~ +3 ! 8' OCEM TOP OF 12' CURB FLUSH MI TH FC
2' MAX. 1' CLEAR 3' C4, 52 I MIN.
q• I TRANSITION FROM 6' CURB TO 12' CURB
~ ~ 5' OA 10' 3' 6' CURB
4 +s ! a• oCEr FLUF£ C4.52 CPY CPH & CPV VARIES CPV
PAVEMENT yy,.:w a
~ar~~ GRADE BREAK SLOPE BOTTOM TO ACHIEVE TRANSITION FROM 6' TO 12' CURB
DETAIL NOTES 2'-9' L01~ +3 ! e' 2' GALVANIZED PIPE INSTALL IN LINE i. FLLNE LENGTH AND SLOPE VAA TES. REFER i0 LAYgJi
PITH FENCE FABRIC ANO DIMENSION PLANS, AND GRADING PLANS. 3 SECTION 2. REFER i0 UYOVi AND DIMENSION PLANS FOR ^
COORDINATE OF CONTROL POINT HORIZONTAL ICPH). 04.52 NOT TO SCALE `1 3. AEFER TO GAADINO PLANS FOR ELEVATION OF C4.52 CONTROL POINT VERTICAL ICPVI, 4 SECTION C4.52 NOT TO SCALE
4. REFER TO UYOUi ANO DIMENSION PLANS i0 1 SECURITY PIPE FOR DETERMINE FLUTE riOTH f5' DR 10'>
- FLUMES UNDER SECURITY FENCE 2 FLUME DETAIL
NOi TO SCALE - NOT TO SCALE
- o
15' 5' MIN. TYP.
8e m
IO' 6'
BOTTOM WIDTH OA i0P OF SLOPE
-4
- ~ ~ ~ TOP OF NAB AT FC i L - ~ rte' Z 0
TOE OF SLOPE - _ 4' TRANSITION TO NO CURB i cn U
f ~y 12' CURBED FLUTE DITCH f= Z Z
_ log Q a (L Z
X o
DIrcH E ~ Fc 8 curl CPH____-.__-_______-_-_ w
Ca, 52 x ' j = 3 CD Z
6 ~ , I x CPV 6 w -N 2
CPH ~ ~M r ~ CPH CPY 2' s _ ~ i r ' i U
3a-_ i ~ ° IB' FLUME TOE ~ 6' APRON TOE-?I .r
' ~ ----'r2.2 K W2.9 ° ~ ~2' T MELDED r in ' > - APR011 OE FABRIC IRE 8'
6' APRON TOE-?~ ~ - 4:1 iYP ICAL SLOPE - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - X_
i LENGTH Oi FLUE TOE - _ r
VAATOP~OF2SLOPE OR BOTTOM WIDTH OR TOP OF SLOPE ~ - q' L~' , 4:1 TYPICAL SLOPE r 1~~' - UI FYP,f63L:~~r _ z J
1 C77 W Q LL-
_ ..-J~ : DETAIL NOTE&
_ r 'b`~= I. AffER To uraur ua DIr~NS 9 9 D50=6' ROCK RIPRAP Q o THICKNESS 2' Z N C4.52
COORDINATE aF CONTROL POINTOHOR[Z~OIITAL~ DETAIL NOTES: G.52 ICPHI. 2. REFER TO GRADING PLANS fOR ELEYATIQV OF I. REFER TO LAYOUT pND OIAENSION PLANS FOA FOR
9 050=6' ROCK RIPRAP CONTRA POIN1 VERTICAL fCPYI, COORDINATE Of CONTROL POINT XOR[20NTAL ICPHI, DETAIL NOTES: C4, 52 THICKNESS = 2' ITAL (CPH). W LU
I. REFER TO LAYOUT AND DIMENSION PLANS FOR 7 FL U COORDINATE OF CONTROL POiNT HORIZONTAL ICPHI, ME APRON APRON DETAIL o C0
5 FLUME APRON TO CHANNEL DETAIL - Nor To scALE ALE 0
_ 6 SECTION NOT TO SCALE C4.52 NOT TO SCALE Co
4' TRANSITION i0 NO CURB TOP Of 12' CU18 AT FG 6' 29' 6
CURBED FLUME
+3 ! B' OCEW C O W ~ m
V ~ ~ m O O C g aP t~ NLL€FIrv t
+3 ! 8' OCEW ROCK AIPRA FC 2 O es 3 b
PONp BOTTOM ELEVATION R F c':_ qm~ o'er ~ .G r:
! ^'F ~ r L Ca~o~h
~ ~ CPH 6' +3 ! 8' OCEr 6' ~ C m aN'f L ~ F ~ s 2 n .C G ^ C L)
x 6' m .Ry,.. M w 7 n " v
IR' fLUAf TOE ROCK RIPRAP o 0 6 a 6, vdU
2' APRON TOE +3 ! B' OCEN i {
w~ R
a LENGTH OF FLUTE TOE 4' IS' 5' HINIMUM 5 ~ VARIES, 12 NAX OR n "a TOP OF SLOPE
y
9 SECTION
~s~ - C4,52 NOT TO SCALE ~ e SECTION
C4,52 NOT TO SCALE SHEET i
e a samO C4.5 2
£;^a #i~¢
Copyright © 2004 by Carter & Burgess, Inc.

AT END OF BEAM _ T+' c+,s3 u.s3 GRATE SCHEDULE FOR TA FR • r JOB b'~ pG
CAST-IN PLACE INLETS 13E'xl~'xN41~' L's Fc NOMINAL CRATE TYPE N q Z:
GRATE SIZE OR 1[N.) APPROVED EQUAL
~ ~ 36x66 NEENAH A-4895-2 W/TYPE L GRATE VARIES 4 X VERTICAL •N..* • lP,
' ~ ~ OCEwi IZ' °t':. °a ~ SUPPORT BEAM 4t'! z a'HEAOED ~ ~ a I I `Y,~ STW ! rY O.C. jDIFFERENCE (IF ANY) HANSON PRECAST END SECTION OR EOUAL
' a ~+I~ ~ MELDED 10 FRAME a. r II U.54 ~ I GROUT BOTTOM F 4' ~
WITH S IETAL RAZE i \ ~ i WTLETLPIPETO 1' X 14t' X 41' L'S ~ ~ VARIES i 141' i W6%ZO BEAM VARIES VARIES u
• i 4 X DIA. - ---------------i
V!' X 5' HEADED 24!'MIN. ' mT 6Vl' FACE STUD ! IZ' OC i BEARING i i ~ - - - i
DETAIL NOTES; ~B $8' B ~ OF ANGLE TO ; I ~ ~ ~ ~ - - - I. REFER i0 GRATE SCHEDULE FOA DEIERMIN[NG INLET DIIENSIONS CONC. SHELF i ~ ~ FACE OF ANGLE ~ i LRCP 4 ' --4- 6 ss,
AND CRATE TYPE. 'ICRITICAL ' i ~ i ~ e i , 2. GRATE AND FRAME SHALL BE RATED FOA H-20 LOADING, DETAIL NOTES W6z20 BEAM DIMENSfONI ~ ~ ~ CONC. SHELF , ~ i ' _ ` 3. PAE-CAS1 INLET COt80AMINC TO NCDOT STANDAA05 IS AN -=1~' ~ ; i - o C4.53
I. FOR GRATE INLETS GREATER THAN 10' DEEP, p~-, ACCEPTABLE ALTERNATIVE. N 1 WA H • L3z3x41z1' ~ ~ i i I LE LLS S ALL BE 8' THiC% WITx 1 w/1214!'ox4 ~ ' ~ - - in 40
B' OCEW DOUBLE MAT AEINFORCINC. HEADED $iU05 y~~ ~ i 2. SUPPORT BEAN NOT REQUIRED FOR 4X2 IEAEi, i ' ' I I' 11 p ROCK RIPRAP
i CAST IN PLACE DETAIL NOTES ~IAN0.EET0 ~ i OR ipP OF SLOPE P OF SLOPE
2 SECTION I• SUPPORT BEAN N01 AEDUIREO FOA 4X2 ItIET. COML. SHELF , ~ C4.32 GRATE INLET DETAIL C4.53 NOT TO SCALE o~l~rt~es`ian :y~ 15' . L
NOT TO SCALE 3 ANCHOR DET ` rT~~ ' AIL L3w3x4/xT'
C4.53 NOT TO SCALE W/1214!'Ww4' 1' I~wEO sTUOs
~a
DETAIL NOTES I. SIPPORT BEAN NOT REQUIRED Fq7 4%2 INLET.
5 SLOPiI 5 SLOPING HEADWALL DETAIL
4 SUPPORT BEAM DETAIL c4,3z NOT TO SCA FG C4.53 NDT TO SCALE ;4.32 NOT TO SCALE
q' /
y 15' 10' MIN,
~ O~ •3 a 6' oc Hoerz SLOTTED VANE DRAIN
•3 1 8'OCEW \ I RCP ~ ROCK AIPAAP OSO = 6', 2' THICK f~--1{ O
o POND BOTTOM ELEVATION R Z <D < U Z
II ~ REFER TO SiOAM o mg Q a- Z
GRAIN PROfILES r RR R(n~ FOR PIPE ELEVATIONS •3 ! 6' OC HORR TYP I II I~I II I~ ' N
~J I~ 36' DRAIN SECTIONS '1 It 6' BOLTED TOGETHER SECTIONS W O ETHER ' T cr
8' FOA VERTICAL DISTANCE IIF ANYI REFER TO STCRN DRAIN PROFILE SHEETS - - - W fl flA N TO O w
fED 1 WIRE DRAIN TO PIPE PVC PIPE Z
3 U=
S SAW 31/1' SLOT IN PIPE ITO ACCEPT DRAIN LL
6 SECTION
C4, 53 NOT TD SCALE ~ ' --y 3>/1'
J
C1l)
SOR-3S PVC SEWER PIPE W LL
ADJUST FRAME TO GRADE LAME O
Z co
i 2 75/B C4.54 STflIICTURE i0 754 R Q 25/9' W
ACCOMMODATE PIPE EDGE OF PAVEMENT S W
f TYP.I 4' 6 4' 3' FILLET 74 cr co O
^Ij~3`~ THROAT [N OPENING TOOLED EDCE$ -1'~~ . ~ ELEVATION ° 5' 'q'' TROWEL FIN, eBAflS f IB' C-C C!~
~ N THROAT W[iH IB' LEGS ~ 4 . ELEVATION *I' 4' 41'/ ' m PAYEIENT I
e. - -
C.I. •4 BARS f W II~~' N°BARS Ai IB' OCfW COVER IB' OCE CONSTRUCTION JOINT
~ Af COAXERS . •4 ! B' OCEW ~ N 1 B' OCEW
OUTSIDE fACE ~ gITSIOE FACE N ! B' DCEW N 1 8' OCEW
INSIDE FACE INSIDE FACE
~TOOLEO•EDGES ' :4 BRAS AF - I 6' OCEW n. ~ flCPj I RCP
I I I c
°m Z C N
4", 4000 P.S.I. CUT REQUIRED Ai BELL CONCRETE TO ALLOW VANE ORIAN TOP OF SLDPE H B 8' OCEW 6' MIN. BASE fLANGE CLEARANCE s W 0 V w$ L O C cn
(TYP,) 6' MIN. 0 O ~ N a
DETAIL NOTES. CUT LONGITUDINAL SLOT 1. MATERIAL ANO WORKMANSHIP SHALL CONFORM WITH THE AEOU[REMENTS OF f0 F[T POSITIONING LUGS r o EP `3m 6' MIN. CONCRETE THICKNESS AT SIDES u m a t
NORTH CAR[LINA D.O.T. STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS ON BOTTOM OF VANE ~ FOR STANOAflD CONCRETE STIX4M MANHOLES. FAAIN CASTING AND BOTTOM OF SEWER WIRE ® c E = ~o i goo 0
2. CONCRETE SHALL NAPE A MINIMJM 28-DAY COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH OF ft'•4000psi. DETAIL NOTES: E 3. REINFORCEMENT SHALL BE GRADE 60 WITH A YIELD STRENGTH OF fy60 Nsi. I. SLOPE [NV~RT OF MANHOLE AS INDICATED ON PROFILE SHEET.
b 4, SLOPE INVERT OF MANHOLE A$ INDICATED ON PROFILE SHEET. 2. PROVIDE I h MIN. CLEARANCE FROM ALL REINFORCEMENT 5. PROVIDE IIh MIN. CLEARANCE FROM ALL REINFORCEMENT TO FACE OF CDNLREIE. TD FACE OF CONCRETE. 6, PROVIDE STEEL REBAR SPACERS FOR WALLS W4iEN MANHOLE HEIGHT E%CEEOS 6'. 3, PROVIDE STEEL REBAR SPACERS FOR WALLS WHEN MANHOLE FASTEN CASTING -0 FASTEN CASTING SECURELY TO PIPE WITH WIRE o
7, PROVIDE MANHOLE STEPS ®15 OC STAGGERED lC[ OA PLASTICI. PLACE TOP STEP HEIGHT EXCEEDS 6'. 30' MAX. FROM FINISHED GRADE. 4, PROVIDE MANHOLE STEPS ®15' OC STAGGERED ~ 8. DEPTH OF DROP INLET FROM FINISHED GRADE TO FLOW LINE OF INLET IS VARIABLE. (CI OR PLASTICI PLACE TOP STEP 30' MA% FROM FINISHED GRADE. S 2
y ~ APPRO%IMA1E DEPTH WILL BE SHOWN ON PLANS AT LOCATION ~ INLET. g ~ 9. ALL STANDARD DROP INLETS SHALL HAVE ONE OPENING ON EACH SIDE UNLESS V V
~ SHOWN ON PLANS. SOR-35 PYC SEWER PIPE 9 : : f511E AS REOUIREDI VC SEWER PIPE REQUIRED)
n 7 DROP INLET 8 SECTION
a= C4.53 NOT TO SCALE C4.53 NOT TO SCALE $ a
`o n BLOCKS TO ADJUST DIPE TO GRADE AND ASSURE 6' M ~n 0 GRADE AND ASSURE 6' MIN. CONCRETE THICKNESS BENEATH PIPE
~i ao 3 .6
~ gf -
~ g SLOTTED VANE DRAIN FOR C4.32 NEENAH R-3599-A OR ACCEPTABLE ALTERNATIVE, NO RAIN FOR SHEET FLOW SHEET
ALTERNATIVE, NOT TO SCALE C4.5 3
s°W'eo %a'
sloe Copyright © 2004 by Carter & Burgess,Inc.

- - -GRAS
MAINTENANCE NOTES: _.i _ , y
y I COVERAGE q a 2 I. ALL EROSION ANO SEDIMENT CONTROL PRACTICES WiLL BE ]NSPECTEO FOR STABILITY , i 1 ` ~ ~ n AND OPERATION AT LEAST ONCE EVERY SEVEN CALENDAR DAYS bND WITHIN 24 HOURS ~q r W N^ r: Q.
i FOLLOWING RAINFALL OF D.5 INCHES OR GREATER. ALL SEDIMENT CONTROL FEATURES ~ ~ ~ SHALL BE MAINTAINED UNTIL FINAL STABILIZATION NAS BEEN OBTASNEO. AR A x yd . .
* 4 ' TALL FESCUE 80 LBS. PER ACRE ~d , ! 2. LOCATIONS WHERE VEHICLES ENTER/EZIT THE SITE MIST BE INSPECTED FOA EVIDENCE , , V
OF OFF-SITE SEDIMENT TRACKING. A TEMPgiARY GRAVEL CONSTAUC110N ENTRANCE/EXIT A $ER[CEA LESPEDEZA 20 LBS. PER ACRE ~8 ~ hh xx WILL BE CONSTRUCTED AT EACH LOCATION WHERE VEHICLES ENTER/EMIT, AND EACH + I ~ WOKE LESPEOEZA 10 LBS• PER ACRE 1 v 4 ENTRANCE WILL BE MAINTAINED OR SUPPLEMENTED AS NECESSARY TO PREVENT SEOiMENT , t
FROM LEAVING THE SITE. / ' ~ ~ , ii _ t e
~ 8 ~ y 3. SEDIMENT BARRIERS MUST BE INSPECTED AND IF IffCESSAAY M15T AR , i`,/' TEMPORARY SEEDED AREAS "+s BE ENL GED [fl I RYE IGRA[N) 120 IBS. PEA ACRE 6 CLEANED IN OROEA i0 PROVIDE A001TIONAL CAPACITY. ALL~NATER1Al E%CAYATEO FROM i'... ' 1 s ~ ~ BEHIND SEDIMENT BARRIERS W[ll BE STOCKPILED ON THE UPSLOPE SIDE. ADDITIONAL i, /~M
d ~ ° Y SEDII~NT BARRIERS MUST BE CONSTRUCTED AS NEEDED. ~ f , ~ 1 1-
g" 4. INSPECTIONS WILL EVALUATE DISTUi8E0 AREAS AND AREAS USED FOR STORING ~ t / " MATERIALS THAT ARE EXPOSED TO RAINFALL FOA EVIDENCE OF, OR THE POTENTIAL FOR, , 4 i
POLLUTANTS ENTEfl LNG THE DRAINAGE SYSTEM. IF ARY TH M T - Q ~ CE55 E A ERUL$ MIST I - \ ~ ~ C v /J \Y BE COVERED, OR ORIGINAL COVERS MUST BE REPAIRED OR SWPLEMENIEO. AL50, ~ , ~ ( , PROTECTIVE BERMS CONFORMING TO 8/C5.11 MIST BE CONSTRUCTED IF NEEDED IN ORDER , , / ~ ~ , _ ,
, Y ~ Y TO CONTAIN RIRIOFi FROM MATERIAL STORAGE AREAS. / /~1 I/ G RDHOUSE ~ ~ ( i / , , ~ r I ~ x - ' ; r 1 Y
- _ 5. GRASSED AREAS WILL 8E INSPECTED TO CONFIRM THAT A HEALTHY STAND OF GRASS I$ ~I ' / ~ ~ ~ ~~IR~ PUMP IOU I / ~ ~ ~q_ MAINTA INED• 1 ~ ( 1 ~Jj' Y~ ( /
y ' . TR~JCK SC,~LE g AA ~ ~ Jv,,_-_,_ f I 1 ; 6. ALL INSPECTIONS ARE TO BE DONE BY THE SITE CONTRACigI, i rY ` , - _ w_ se 4_ . . , ~ c. _ y . , _
_ , i i _ _ _ . . . _,_..r _ a~ , . -
p _ - _ ~w
n . r - ~ - ' 3 ...1 I • ij , - ~~f~ I` ? r - 'l , CHECK M
b " f , ' '.1/~ ) \ ~ ` , ~ I COI, t ~ $ ~ i I ~ I, ~ r ti ~I ,,Jit, 1' ~ ,I
• r, - - , , ,
i.. ` , _ I ~ '1 w - ` !
, gg - " ,
4 ~ S 3 ;'*rl' ~ i ,,.!~c_ r __----^----•.___.``l \v1W'~ I I I ,I r~" ,
- _ „ ~ -
-ate--- - - I' I, c ~ $ ~ ~ it i Y-~y~..:.'---------- - - _ I ~ I I I I I I I i k ,`I ' R -TIC :/ice/ C. ~ t - - I - - - o' r v,
~ ~ jj ~ - , ,'y^ s%' - - - _ _ I, ,e~+"I r =I_._I~~, T 1- 11 1. I_ _ I , ~ _ , , ~
- - - - - - - I ~ 1~1 rh' ~ ~ ' 1 /"a, Y it ~ p ~ °~,I i I i I .j I . _i_, ~ "',I ~ I_,., I '~R& / ~ I ~j~ ! V / , v ~a"_ 1, ~ i, ,k, i , I •
3 ~ ~ , ~ 1 C~ ~I -'T:1 I I ;I I 1 1! # ,I t .c i °s s io ii l,• I- ' , I ~PAO CT[OiI ~ P '-+b'°'. - _ ~.~..-._:_.r:_....._t.~.._ _ - - - 6~.~,_ d ~ , f~~__i Ali i I ,~~I, I ! rl I I I li I i1 1 '7 t 3 l HECK-,A a O U
~ . ' } 1 ~•„I , ROOT C .~'g~._._.~.=._._.~._[-.~._{_._._.,_,._._.r._ Z Z
I I' 1' / . X
~ I I I I I I I i I I I I,` , EI , a Z r
i~~l, ili~~ i+~s i i i ill i ~ l I I i~ `,i i''~-~_ ~TOR._ I I'>w ti o q + ` NAY BALB - - -~-4,- - _t_. _.T wcl)
n i~ PARKING FllEL• `ISUAND +
,
~ ~ i ,_.:_."~.~~>z~~;~ ' -'-e~; ~ FUEL ~ STOA~4GE'~ i/ i i ; i i ~ 1 -1- -'r- 7~ i i i I -i -.~.~.~-,i-- W
~ ii ~ / ~ ~ + ~ - I': i i i I i I i; I it i i 1 - ' . ~ • ~ ~ ~ ~I .,r - - - 1, I p l m 1 \x LL
}ia II ~ , ~ I1,1 i 1 ~~i I / II I ,1 I .'I la I , i ~ ~ N ra ,
d y - _ , I, ~ E ~ ~ READY LINE ~
~ ~ r ~ I i ~I~ ~ 1 ~ ~ i I € ~9 I I ' I 1' i d
U _ { 1
- 33 ~ P~REA ~4~OOT. # - i._.,~. i'. i._.s ~ i , a I + , • • , rn ~ ~ Z Z
~ ~ _....___..,::_.,-a 7 _ I I I ,_.,I~I I I I h' I I-`, 1 i'• I 3 ~c ; DRAWING LEGEND: A~ ~ ~ ,.4 . \ ••.i it\ _ e a e a -+i I I 1 I I I I I ! ~ 1 I I I ~ I i w 00Q Z
;a 9- w_ - . ~ I c ~AR~A 110q,~ CHECK DAM - i) -*3-•_.I-._1-_.i_._i_._i~._i_j~._j_._~_. _ a.y,_•y._.t.~LQlj.~.QQ - - - s~- Q J
' ~ W~ r'T' t i I fit;. -r-. ~ r f,:,-=~::=~~ -SB- SEDIMENT BARRIER I ~ Z ~ I I I ! I I I I I i j! I I I { 11 I ` ° i Z1-_j "r f- - - - - - OZO
n FLUME INLET _h I I 1 I I i 1 1 1 I I I E I I I I i I ~~,,i a o o , PROTECTION ,,ta~~, . %
. Ip{4 4~C}~~},~g~ ' Q _ _ _ _ ~i~FRdGEHA;TIQN ' ' n R .4, ' -~I ! I I i I i ! I I 4 I 1 ! A`~ "'ti/'~`
A,4 ~ ; CDNSTRUCTION ENTRANCE '-'---'d-°°:•~^°^ _ _ _ _ _ @,-~~~~1\l\\d - p I I ~ 1 1 - 7 I B~ ~ ~ I i. I. ..j a o` A a B , 'I, S ~I }t - ~k W Co U
n d R ~ f, , } , ' G,al,`' , , d~: ~ ~'1---~1---i--~I-•-T-'-i-'-i-I-'-I-'-f--~-T'-€--'-3 -'~'--i -'~•-'-f~-F--'-F--• t 1~~: .1 F ,bll' '~~~1, ~ '6y ® EROSION CONTROL BLANKET _ -r ~ ~ ^~i I I I I I 1 1 I I I I I I I ' Y ,"~i I r
~ * ~ ~ LIMITS OF CONSTRUCTION , ~ "I-_.'-'-~- - - - - - _~_-~--'-i'_. j'--~ i r r=1~~ ~rlr ~f , ~ ~
g ~ Q ~N~RGY' C~NTE~ I i T ;M; '~x ~xx ~ i - I I I I I I I I I I z ! I I I I A ~'t i s V1~ \ b I ' I AI ~ i 8 RIP-AAP APRON ~ ~.l..l,~: " o o , a _ o r
54 6 9 4 ® / f- .I ~,I ~•3 I I I i I I I , € ! ,~rilff/ i I, ~ x x x Y ~ I I I I I I I I ~A \titC~1 - y~~r ~ ` ~ ' ~ s
~ ® a I CURD INLET PROTECTION _ t ~ - _ - - ~ I ~ E' - - J. o jE~p + , , gg y \ \l V i i~
R - 4 I % !4 ( f ilu r ~ , , ® DROP/GRATE INLET PROTECTION r i I 1 i' i ! i _ 1
g ~ -
€ t +i ~ ~ ~ INSTALLATION NOTES: TRAIL
- 7 i ~ ~ ~ L CONTRACTOR TO COMPLY WITH THE STORM WATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN ISWPPP! ~ ~ r ' i ~ I ( .61
~ B $ PREPARED FOR THIS PROJECT ALONG WITH ALL LOCAL, STATE AND FEDERAL l.~! - ~ , I - - { _ , ! REGULATIONS FOR $EOl1fNi AND EROSION CONTROL. ~ I I _ Y~ 4.. 9. Y.. mss" _....~J,. 1 T , to 6 C N W
`j ~M,. _ - _ 1 1 2. CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL ADDITIONAL SEDIMENT CONTROL DARRIERS AS NECESSARY - r _ e TO CONTAINAIICONSTRUCTIONSEDIMENTONSITE. ~ A s.-::~ -.-,~._;-~,^wr---_.-•-~-r ~~~.->1= -'^-.u.-:_-- ':y. - + a~ ;ri - - ~ W p d ~O O Ctav^m
~ . , 3. CONTRACTOR SHALL MAINTAIN ALL EROSION ANO SEDIMENT CONTROL BARRIERS DURING I~___~~ - _ _ r, 'a _ ' L d i 19 ~LLm
CONSTRUCTION. - - - , s . 4• ANY ACCIDENTAL RELEASE OF SEDIMENT FROM THE SITE SHALL BE CLEANED IF' BY THE } ' `r WS 0 i
, + i ~ 6 CDNTAACTOA. , ~ a " , i 4 ° ' ~ is f t r r i ly a ~ m a2S S Ll
1 ~ ',t 1 i ~d ~ ~ L 5. CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE 0. iEMPORAAY GRAVEL OA1YE FOR ALL CONSTRUCTION - _ „ , r , ? R E ACCESS ONTO EXISTING PAVED ROADS. i ` ` , ~ , 35° 00'00" ° = m~a or SR
~ ; .r_ ; _ 6, CONTRACTOR SHALL REMOVE ALL SEDIMENT CONTROL BARRIERS AT THE COMPlET10N OF M „ _ _ ~ , , 2w ~~Dn ~ ~ CONSTRUCTION, OR IF NECESSARY, AFTER ESTABII$HMENT OF PLANT INC. \ _ ~ ~ !,~li' 1 PLAN TRUE NORTH slDjR: «o - NORTH '=L
, ~a ~ ~ 1. EAATX CINVTAINMENT BERMS ARE TD BE LOCATED ALONG PERIMETER OF ALL AREAS OF ~ - "S,~ ~ ~ ~ j. 1~ ' , 7 TEMPORARY FUEL STORAGE ANO HANDLING, REa 8/CS.II. - / ,f 1 *U I f 2 s~
i Y 8 ~ o _ .p.. ~ ~ . I n LL rc B• ALL PERMANENTLY EXPOSED SLOPES SHALL BE STABILIZED AS PER THE GRASS TABLE, - - ~ uu
~ n RE. _
~ h~ 9• WITHIN 14 DAYS AFTER CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY TEMPOAAAfLY OR PERMANENTLY CEASES "2, _ _ ~ v . IN ANY PAATIC0.AR AREA, ALL DISTUR8E0 GAOUNp WHERE THERE MILL NOT BE - , / ~ ~:z S CONSTRUCTION FOfl LONGER THAN 21 GAYS MUST BE 1EIPORARILY OR PERMANENTLY '~'~r 1 ~y ,
~ i u SEEDED ANO MULCHED. , ) i ^ ~ /
10. DUST CONTROL SHALL BE PERFORMED DY iNE CONTRACTOR BY APPLYING WATER AS i /
g g ~ II. SEDIMENT BARRIERS SHAH BE PLACED ]MMEDIATELY OOWNSLOPE DF ALL STOCK PILES. ~ ~ _ .I - -A~ ~ '
~-r~ 12. ALL PERMANENTLY E%POSED SLOPES SHALL BE STABILIZED MITH A NATIVE SEED MIX. ~ ff ,I ? REFER TO C5.01 FOR PERMANENT SEED MI%. n^•'~ i~ i i ni SHEET
Y' ~'"m' ' 13. a~•£' SHALL BE USED FOR ALL ROCK OUIFALL EROSION PROTECT]ON. ~ EROSION AND SEDIMENTATION CONTROL PLAN ~ 8 i 0 100 200 300 400
n~ a 14. HAY BALE SHALL DE INSTALLED AROUND THE SLOTTED VANE DRAIN UNi1L THE CONSTRUCTION C5. 01 SCALE; I'=tOD' } IS COMPLETED. eo GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET C5.01
~-'1 o`a'
Copyright © 2004 by Corter & Burgess,Inc.

R.O.W.
50' MIN.
° ~!'-YI' DG. STONE ° o o °o PLACE Ai LEAST ONE CW a 4r ° ON ITS SIDE IN EACH BOTTOM A N M ~ u-
s ° o 0 0o ROW FOA DRAINAGE I 0 0 ° - ° STONE TO WITHIN 2' ~ I 4 y da E2S. fit;
o°o ° o° N CKR1 BLOCKS DF TOP DF BLDGK$ C5.11 o p p ~ 0 c I' MIN.
50' MIN.
C5.11 ~4 AEBAAS (3' LONCI Ih' WIRE KESH 2'-3' DIR. OVER BLOCK ttEAN STONE /-ROADWAY GRADE TO PREVENT RUNOFF v
2:1 ~ 2;1 OPENINGS Z 0o EXIST, I e r a I I I I I ROADWAY FROM LEAVING SITE - s
FIOW ~b ,Q e' I I I I I O O 0 Op Op
s oR ID, I I I I DETAIL NOTES FLUME I I I I 1. A STABILIZED CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE SHALL APPLY TO POINTS Cf CONSTRUCi1CN INGRESS AID EGRESS WHERE SEDIMENT MAY BE TRACKED
OR FLOM OfF THE CONSTAIICTION SITE. 2. A STABILIZED CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE MUST BE CONSTRUCTED TO FIUEI FILTER FABRIC
A MINIMUM LENGTH OF 50 FEET WHERE THE SOILS AAE SANDS OR GRAVEL OR 100 FEET MINIMUXI WHERE SOILS ARE CLAYS OA SILT. THESE LENGTHS
2 SECTION SHALL BE INCREASED WHERE FIELD CONDITIONS DICTATE. 3. A F[LTEA FABRIC SHALL BE INSTALLED BEFORE INSTALLING THE STABILIZED
C5.11 NOT TO SCALE 4. ALLSSUAFACENYATER FLOWING OR DIVERTED TOWARD CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCES SHALL 8E PIPED ACROSS THE ENTRANCE.
z
1 FLUME INLET PROTECTION 3 STABILIZED CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE a 4 SECTION ~ N
C5.11 NOT TO SCALE C5.11 NOT TO SCALE C5.1I NOT TO SCALE
STEEL OR W000 POST AT 10' OC IMA%.1 9
WOVEN WIRE FENCE 2'-3' DIR. CLEAN STONE C5.11 _ g
1MIN. 12U! GUAGE, MA%. 6' NESHI L + DISTANCE BETWEEN CHECK DAMS,
SEDIMENT FENCING SUCH THAT POINTS A ANO B AAE AT I EQUAL ELEVATIONS. 9' MIN
I ANCHOR FABRIC [N 6' X 6' z z TRENCH. BACKFILL d COMPACT II-1101 om o~ x°s iz a
~ II. ~IRI~ f S , , I ROUND LINE MIN. o o ° o °,o °o °o ° 0 2A' NAX Ir g~~:~t~ooe
rv I F~ fLOW TYP. ° ° . 00 0'. o M ° OD°De I~ r
~ _ ~I~ 8°° ~ o°ayoo oo FILTER FABRIC 1 00 boo 0 Z
° 11 ~ A ao° "°~0 u ~D F 11 ~ III °°o-------------- °0. O
o 0 a o 000 ~ p°p ~AO° ~ ' 111 B COMPACTED EMBANKMENT U) U ZZ
w a o, oo ovoa.. 0•.0 j1'lll I ° ' ° DETAIL NOTES °~•.D s I, CHECK DAN i0 HAVE 2' MINIMIRI TOP WIDTH. p~ a
2. 510E SLOPES TO BE AT 2:1. ~z x0
DETAIL NOTES: 6 CHECK DAM CROSS SECTION w co ' vt T
I. INSTALLATION TO BE PEA MANUFACTUAEfl'S RECOMlffN0ATI0N. 2. TO RE USED FOR TERMINAL EI?OS & PERIMETER SIDES. CS, 11 NOT TO SCALE ~0 o w
3. THE iW0 POST OPTIONS ARE (U W000 . I• X 2• DR 3• MIN. DIR. ~ HECK DAM IN SWAL E a EARTI- ANO t21 STEEL 1.33 LBS/FT.MIN. 8 EARTH CONTAINMENT BERM 3 w
C5.11 NOT TO SCALE U =
5 SEDIMENT BARRIER ES•" ROCK X5.1, NOT TO $Cl 0 LL_
C5•" SEDIMENT FENCE Nor To scALE NOT TO SCALE
Z O
F__
FINISHED CRAOE ENVIRONMENTAL OVERLAP TRENCH WITH BLANKET TEMPORARY a U.) F- J
BLANKET OR MAT 6' OA MAT AT DOWNSTREAM END. MIN. PLYWD00 CAP Z Q w F-
TEMPORARY ~I INLET, STAGE ONE 1 - PLYWOOD CAP 11~ IBII :,8 I 1 0 0
7iCil S J 0 J
~ FINISHED GARDE z I O Cc
COMPACTED BACKFILL TEMPORARY _ I BACK ILL . I- I STORM DAAIX ~ STORM DRAIN STORM DRAIN
FOR NAT USE Y16' % IB' INLET, STAGE ONE I I PIS I plpE METAL PIN W[TH IU1~ -III-III I ~ PIPE 00
WASHER SPACED AT 5 MAX. i FOR BLANKET USE 'U' SHAPED STAPLES WITX 6' LEGS Z;5 0 O
AND I' CROWN SPACED AT \ ~ 4' MAXIMUM. ^ ~ w

DETAIL NOTES: I.INSTALLATIDNTOBEPEAMANUFACTWiEA'SRECON+ENDATION. ~Q CURB INLET PROTECTION (STAGE ONE) CURB INLET PROTECTION (STAGE 0
2. i0 8E USED FOR tERMINAL EImS d PERIMETER SIDES. (STAGE ONE)
C5•" ALTERNATIVE ONE ~5•" ALTERNATIVE TWO g ENVIRONMENTAL BLANKET & MAT NOT TO SCALE NOT TO SCALE
C5•" ANCHOR TRENCH DETAIL
NOT TO SCALE
2'-3' DIR. CMU BLOCK y UE
CLEAN STONE INLET O O p o ° W a ° o ° O° O° ° O o `a CN°nm O o N g
o, 111U BLOCKS = p « o! m S € r o
3 WRAP ROCK o a C5.11 WITH WIRE CMI BLOCK O O O°° ry c~ `o m 2 ip a m t
3 6'TO MESH RETAINING BOARD M N B• 2'-3' DIR. INLET, STAGE iW0 C5.11 P m CS•il •4 REBARS t3' LONG) L 000 t ' °o
3 CLEAN rc STONE a ~~-nn s ai tlgR 2.1 m! DRAINAGE 2:1 c~tj
I E ' FILTER FABRIC _ O • AF STRUCTURE 2 ^ - Y o 1. o i
1' MIN TYP. MIN. o' ° v 2 0 0 V UU ® O p jo,
C n 6' TO 8'
w ~ RETAINING 6 BOARD l2'%M' MIN.1 I INSERT iHRU CMI BLOCK HOLE o s o °°o00 ><t'-3/4' OIA. STONE
o 6 ~ CURB ° R a> o 0 0 p°O e -
~ =m s (2 CURB INLET PROTECTION (STAGE TWO ° ~m ~ O ,y O °
~`A ~ C5.11 NOT TO SCALE
~ ~ ~ ~ DETAIL NOTES:
gi i. WIRE MESH WITH In' ~ENINGS SHALL BE USED TO WRAP THE FILTER ROCK. L 3 SECTION 1 q GRATE ~ ' a 2. STONE SHALL BE PILED AGAINST THE WIRE SO AS TD ANCHOR lT C5.11 NOT TO SCALE l4 GRATE/DROP INLET PROTECTION SHEET
~ ~ 7 AGAINST THE CMU BLOCK. C5, I I NOT TO $C. y~ R$ u 3. IF THE STONE iILTER BECOMES CLOGGED WITH SEDIMENT SO THAT CS.iI NOT TO SCALE
~ ° i Ii NO LONGER ADEQUATELY PERFORMS Ii5 FUNCTION, THE STONE MUST " S a BE PULLED AYAY fROM THE 110.ET, CLEANED ANO REPLACED. C5.11
~_eo ^ A'.
3iOC Copyright © 2004 by Carter & Burgess, Inc.

DRAWING NOTE=°N
I. PAVING AND GRAVEL DRIVE SECTIONS W w DETAILED ON C7.01
DRAWING LEGEND:
® EXTRA HEAVY DUTY CONCRETE PAVEMENT
® HEAVY DUTY CONCRETE PAVEMENT
LIGHT DUTY CONCRETE
GRAVEL DRIVE
\
~~j/ ,"~y E%TAA NEAYY _r J~ ~ .f i DUTYCONCAETE ~JY""'""...`..~. J/, ` / v'// , Vii,!/ HEAVY DUTY z
' "`.r,L. _".!.L. .._.::":._C~.LLc~u__ _.~L..'_.;.!, . CDNCRETE XTRA A Y E HE V 6 1K EXTRA HEAVY
DUTY CONCRET DUTY CONCRETE
i
N
' - - o
74.24' n N
XEAYY DUTY ~ ~ ~ ~ CONCRETE i i i I f I I f I ' I i 24' 1 mt O Z
®~_._.I_._~._. (80' t s I 4 I i i ~ I
_ _,_~_._~._.-._.i_._._.~._.~ ._r_._:_.
~ ,f ! I I i I I I 1 1 I l i l z
.,r -I-' f'--I - - f-'I --I- 80' 90' S0' 90' S0'
i { I I I f f I i { HEAVY DUTY u) U CONCRETE z z
I i F 1 I I I ! i -I _ I i ! - - T ~ i ~ ~ - - Q
r I I i I aXZ
x ) ~ I I I .T. ~ . ~r- 25 w o cr
~ g ¢ ~ . ~ , " i i ~ ~ - ~----r--j- f-
~ ~ ~ ~ Y I ~ I i ~ t
- - I-• ~ - - - ~ - - - T. p .F: i E 7~ j 'Y I I I ! I r ! 1 3 ~ C° z w U=
I ~ u ~ -'-i'- - - - - - - - '-i- ~ ~ ~ . c) LL
~ ~ ~ ~ - - - ' - - ' - -'-I - i - - -
~ ~ ~i i i .s. .I ~ ~i i i i i i , i I I ! i l I I ! i I !
R~~~ i i i i~ i z
d 6 d 1 ! 3 i 1 I i I I I Q
Y ~ > f I I I I 1 I I I a ~ x 6
S Y ' ~ ~I,'3 Y I i I i I I I I 1 i ~ k I I I I I I I 1 { I
.t - - ~ 1 t~}~ f~ ~~ni a . t t I ~ ~ << h ~ # t t + J
i I I I i I I 1 I I I i I 1. ' BUFFER I i i~ ZONE ! i ' - i-' - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - i ~ iii CAAVEL > t I t i i I" I. '1' -1- -T 7-T. .T. ~ ~ ~ ~ ;~~„~'~~I'~II J Q GRAVEL
) ~ u~. i is iiiiiu' iiiin~i UCHT OUTY 1 l I I I I I I I--L'~'-'~~-~~'--~~--~'-'~'~~-'~--~.~~~~„~~~,uE~,;,~~~~~~.,~~~1~~.~~i~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~i~i~~~ .CONCRETE ww
nui~uu :~ttiiuiuuunuui i;ii" uii F- 0 z
-'!-'-'I-'-~-'-I-'-i- -i-`-'-T- ~ ~ -'~'-'-F --+~---F -'7-f -'k r ~ ^ p - 7--'r• ;~~iiiiii~iii i~iiii~ii~~~iiiii~~i iiiiiii' iii m
~ I I I I I I I I ! I i I I I I I I I I ~i~iiu~~i=.-~ ~i~~~iin~~~ii~iiiiniiii"'~'~nui a n ~ _;iiiin nu ~uu~~ Hill iiiini i~iu~i w
~b ~-'I---;--1-'-I-'-1-~-'~-- -~'-'~~-'7'--T---1--'1'T---~~- :,',.;:,-~~":iiF,~~r~~iiiiiiiiltl~liiini ~ i i i i i i i i ~ i i i i i i i i ,~,.r:;,~~~~,~~~~~~~~~~E~~~~~~~„~~~~~~~~~ J Q
I i " I i~i~ri~iun~~i~ni 5 5 i~~i i~iiiiiiiiiiiiii Y Y e - 7~'.:. _ - _ i~niuii F~~,~~n~:i ti~i u~i iii ~~~n ii iiiiiiiii
6 3 $ ~ ~ i 3 3 i
R k ~ ,
d~/ ,
~ ~ ~ ~
~ ~ & > >
III ~ ~a 3~i i > > Z > ?">S i > °m 2 L N
W ~ O
s =
t o ~o3G n Z c ~`tX CC
g 16 35° 00'00"
z W E co®a jR i
R 9 PLAN TRUE NORTH uz" to NORTH
Q N
C ~ 1 u ~ uu i a
S ~ ! w O 9 ll~ a.
- t op~ p C, c
9 °m x u n
on ~a c c a x
~ ~i 3 ~ Si t z
~-g~ 1 OVERALL -ALTERNATE PAVING PLAN i SHEET o
n~ C6.01 SCALE: i' 100' n °u 0 100 200 300 400
i .r e ~ f GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET C6.0 2
$zeO s^n 0 3 i
~i~¢ CoDyr*,ght © 2004 by Carter & Burgess,Inc.

0/1' REFEA TO REFER TO 8/C7.01 SAW JOINT w r , us
REFER TO 8/C7.01 SAW JOINT D/1 REFEA TO a/CT.01 D/4 REFER TO 8/C7.01 ANY ADJACENT BUiLOIxG V[ LENGTH i0 TEXT OR FI%EO OBJECT JOIN1 IS'NI N.1 D/4
° o REFEA TO B/CT.01
D/1 ° d d.• .d d , e d e• •e n
e r 7 ° ° d . • 7' 7' DOMEI CAP ~ , I d .
'e P PREMOLOEO REMOLDED FIBERBOARD IB' IB' FIBERBOARD YI' x 14' SMOOTH DOWEL BARS ~
>/1' x 14' SMOOTH DOWEL f 18' OC ° •5 x 36' OEFDRAffO BRAS B IB' OC COATED WiTH TIE BARS ! 21' OC CREASE OR ENGINEER APPROVED
PRATING COMPOIWD
~ LONGITUDINAL CONSTRUCTION 2 DOWELED EXPANSION JOINT 3 LONGITUDINAL CONSTRUCTION JOINT 4 THICKENED EDGE EXPANSION
5 - JOINT WITH TIE BARS DETAIL - DETAIL "DE"-JOINT - & TRANSVERSE CONTRACTION JOINT - JOINT DETAIL "E"-JOINT - DUMMY JOINT DETAIL
"L "-JOINT "or To scALE DETAIL 'L T"-JOINT NOT TO SCALE "S"-JOINT
NOT TO SCALE NOT TO SCALE NOT TO SCALE
v ~
SAY JO]Ni MIDTH
D/4 REFER TO B/C7.01 8/C7. 01
i REFER TO 8/C1.01 ~ s 41' RAOlUS TYP ~ x D ~ ~ ~
REFER f0 B/C 7.01 D/q 7h• w OOW CORNING 890 SL SEALANT ° SAW JOINT ° ; APPLIED PEA MANUFACTURER'S ° -A- o - o
0/4 0/2 d . d d d d d • d RECOMLExDArloxs. D D D• D z
° ° < JOINT (ACES SHALL 8E CLEANED PER • . . d d d ~ d d • ~ d ~ SEALANT MANUFACTURER'S e d d
° d AECOMENDATIONS ANO ARSOIUTELY 7' 7' d ~ , d • d DRY WHEN SEALANT IS PLACED. T VI N Y6 e m s N< 0 3
I/4' x 14' SMOOTH DOWEL ttOSED CELL POLYETHYLENE ~ , IB' 19• ° BARS t IB' OC FOANBACKUP AOD - AOD SNAIL YI x 14' SMOOTH T' T DOWEL BARS a IB' OC mN W ' SMOOTH ° $ g 2S a 18' OC o 0 0
BE CIRCULAR WiTH DIAIETER IA' GREATER THAN SAW JOINT WIDTH. •5 x 36' DEFORMED V2 LENGTH TO NEXT JT. 41 LENGTH i0 NE%T JT.
TIE BARS ®24' OC E%PANSION JOINT MATERIAL (5' XTN.) t5' MINJ OR CONTRACTION CRACI(,
z 0
DETAIL NOTES: 9 ALTERNATE KEYED LONGITUDII
I.WIBN PLACING SEALANT IN E%PANSION JOINT, POLYETHYLENE BOND BREAKER TAPE SHALL OE ON TOP OF THE PAEMOLDED CONSTRUCTION JOiNT & TRAN~ .ONGITUDINAL co z
EXPANSION JOINT IN LIEU OF BACKUP ADD. T & TRANSVERSE a X z W
6 DUMMY JOINT WITH r THICKENED CONSTRUCTION JOINT a JOINT SEALANT DETAIL CONTRACTION JOINT DETAIL " DETAIL "LT"-JOINT o
NOT TO SCALE NOT TO SCALE - TIE BARS DETAIL - DETAIL 'T"-JOINT - 1 ~ T oC
"Si"-JOINT NoT TD scALE 0)
NOT TO SCALE CDZ 3 W
TYPE THICKNESS DESCRIPTION ALTERNATE fOR RCC E%TRA xfiAVT Durr 3U1• HOT NI% ASPHALT SURFACE COURSE U= 0
TYPE THICKNESS DOCK APRON DES IP HEAVY DUTY PTANDEARDISPECIFI~TIONS 'O. T. U-
oNLV CR TION THICKNESS DESCRIPTION IVt' s 6* AGGREGATE MEETING N.C.D.O.T.
E%TRA HEAVY DUTY 12' - INAEINFOACED PORTLAND CEI~Ni 12• ACLLER COMPACTED CONCRETE IS TO LIGHT DUTY 2' CONCRETE WI Tx A 4000 PSI BE UTILIZED AS AN ALTERNATE HEAVY DUTY 9' B' COM°RESSiON STRENGTH AT 28 g• PAYING METHOD [N ALl AREAS E%TRA IBAYY DUTY IV!' XOT NI% ASPHALT BINDER CWRSE SECTION 520, COMPACTED TO 95% OF THE MODIFIED PROCTOR MAXIMUM ~ DRY DENSITY (ASTM D-1557). _
DAYS EXCEPT AREAS CURRENTLY PER SECTION 610 OF N. C.D. D. T. d ~ d ~ d L[GHi DUTY 5' _ 5' DESIGNATED xEAVY DUTY CONCRETE HEAVY DUTY 1' STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS Q
Q ~ ADJACENT TO THE BUILOIMC AND DOCKS •d . D D D E%TRA HEAVY DUTY 6' - AGGREGATE MEETING N. C. D.O. T. 6' AGGREGATE MEETING N.C.D.O•T. L[CXT OU1T N/A ° 0~ O O W 0 0 0 0 C7
• 0 0 0 STANDARD SPEC IFICAifDN SECTIOIR STANDARD SPECIFICATION SECTIINI xEAVY DUTY 6' 3~t' 520, COMPACTED TO 95% OF S' 520, COMPACTED TO 95% OF EXTRA HEAVY DUTY 6' AGGREGATE MEETING N. C.D.O. T. MOD [PIED PROCTOR MAXIMUM NODff1ED PROCTOR MAX[MM STANDARD SPECIFICATION SECTION 520,
LIGHT WTY 6' - DRY DENSITY IASTM D-15571 S' OAT DENSITY IASTM 0-15511 HEAVY DUTY 6' COMPACTED TO 95X OF IKIDIFIEO PROCTOR MAXIMUM I- L- 6' SUBGRADE COMPACTED TO AT LEAST z O 987 OF THE MODIFIED PROCTOR MAXIMUM W
SUiGRADE COMPACTED TO AT LEAST GRADE COMPACTED TO Ai LEAST LIGHT DUTY 6' OAY DENSITY IASTM 0-15571 fIITER FABRIC 98'Z OF MOD IFIEO PROCTOR MA%I 8% OF MDDIftED PROCTOR MA%IM1N FILTER FABRIC DRY DENSITY (ASTM 0-1557) AT A MOISTURE CONTENT WITHIN t3% OF OPTIMUM Z r
ALL 30' 30' DRY DENSITY USTM D-IS57) AT A 30' Y OENS]TY IASTM D-15571 AT A SUiGRAOE COMPACTED i0 AT LEAST 98% MOISTURE CONTENT yITxIN i3% ISiIAff CONTENT WITHIN 33X Of MODIFIED PROCTOR NA%INUN DAY OF OPTIMUM MOISTURE OPTIMUM MOISTURE ALL 30' DENSITY IASTM 0-15571 AT A MOISTURE MOISTURE. W
CONTENT WITHIN i3% OF OPTINIM - O W w
ALL ENGINEERED FILLS BELOW All ENGINEERED FILLS AELOW MOISTURE ~ ~ GR A 30' UNDER AGGREGATE BASE 30' LRRDER AGGREGATE BASE ~•A All ENGINEERED FILL VARIES VARIES SHALL BE COMPACTED TO AT VARIES SHALL BE COMPACTED i0 AT ALL ENGINEERED FILLS BELOY CT.O1 NOT T( 12 GRAVEL DRIVE SECTION 2 C=/)
LEAST 95% OF MODIFIED PROCTOR LEAST 95% Oi MODIFIED PROCTOR 30' UNDER AGGREGATE BASE MAXIMUM DRY DENSITY MA%IM1M DRY DENSITY AlL ENGINEERED FIL VARIES SHALL RE COMPACTED TO AT C7.01 NOT TO SCALE -
LEAST 95X OF MODIFIED PROCTOR NA%IMIM DRY DENSITY W F-
u~
~p CONCRETE PAVING SECTION ASPHALT PAVING SECTION C7, 01 NOT TO SCALE C7. D1 NOT TO SCALE
I° z wlo
I' STYROFOAM INSULATION BY BC <Im
14' AGGREGATE MEETING SECTION 520 I OF THE NCOOT STANDARD SPECIfICATfONS ~ COMPACTED TO 95% OF MAXIMUM DRY DENSITY
IASTM 0-15571 - BY CFC BC TD RESTORE AfTER ~ y Eo
FOOTiNG PLACEMENT . 6' SLAB AND 10P 3' ~ - ~ ~ AGGREGATE BASE - RY CFC TYPE y •o .z TYPE THICKNESS DESCRIPTION ~ =y
a W ~ .gyp ~ EXTRA HEAVY DUTY 10' UNREINFORCED PORTLAND CEMENT $ 2-9
PAVEMENT ANO BASE EXTRA HEAVY OUiY OR TOPSOIL BY SC BOTTOM II' AGGREGATE MEETING SECTION 520 ASPXAL T, GRAVEL OA ' ' OF THE NCDOT $TANDARO SPEC IF ICAiIONS HEAVY DUTY CONCRETE WITH A 4000 PSI r m - S n HEAVY DUTY 8' COMPRESSION STRENGTH AT 28 m°C « r
UNPAVED SURFACE. ~ COMPACTED TO 98% OF MODIFIED PROCTOR ' ~ MAXIMUM DRY DENSITY IASTM 0-1551) - BY SC d d ~ d LICHi DUTY DAYS y o I'M o ` o LIGHT DUTY 5'
CONCRETE PAYEAENT _ _ _ _ _ _ ~ - ~ ~ G 3 0 J I D • D E%TRA HEAVY DUTY <`c 51=1 CEMENT TREATED AGGREGATE a O m a- LL EXTRA HEAVY DUTY 6' ' c E BASE WITH 4X TYPE I PORTLAND •C a •a c
b ~ b d d d , d 2 L[N[T OF YORK • 0 0 0 HEAVY DUTY HEAVY DUTY 6• CEMENT BY WEIGHT MEETING 1` c o a t°p COOT SECTION 520, COMPACTED
~ ~ , d . •d d ° SUBCRAOE ~ ~ _ ~ I BY SC 8 ~ ° °p ~ SC COMPACT IH llfi5 6' SLAB LIGHT DUTY AND CUT RACK ON 2•I SLOPE. TO 95X OF MODIFIED PROCTOR d f o n LIGHT DUTY 6' MAXIMUM DRY DENSITY(ASTM 0-1557) o U m
~ 5 ~ 2' BASE LEVELING COURSE BY CFC t; UBGRADE COMPACTED TO AT LEAST .2 98% OF MODIFIED PROCTOR MAXIMUM v
m ~ BACKF ILL AND COMPACTION ALL c ~ 6' AGGREGATE AEETING SECTION 520 BY BC OF THE NCDOT STANOAAD SPECIFICATIONS ALL 30' RY DENSITY (ASTM 0-1557) AT A c c ISTURE CONTENT WITHIN t3% u° ° F OPTIMUM MOISTURE
a w 5' COMPACTED TO 9B% OF MODIFIED PROCTOR 6 - MAXIMUM ORY DENSITY IASTM 0-1557) TOE OF SLOPE COMPACTED FILL CEMENT STAOILIZED W/ 4% TO T/. PORTIAIA ALL ENGINEERED FILLS BELOW
o BY SC CEMENT - BY SC 30' UNDER AGGREGATE BASE ALL ENGINEERED FILL VARIES SHALL BE COMPACTED TO AT
a" 6, ALL ENGIREERED FILL ~ - _ I3 THICKENED EDGE OF PAVEMENT DETAIL ALTERNATIVE SLAB SECTION 30 LEAST 95% OF MODIFIED PROCTOR MAXIMUM DRY DENSITY
- ADJACENT TO ASPHALT PAVEMENT, da
p~ GRAVEL ACCESS DRIVE AND UNPAVED AREAS 1q GRADING WORK AT FOUNDATION ALTERNATIVE CONCR ?E CONCRETE PAVING SECTION
~ o W NOT TO SCALE , 5 o - NOT TO SCALE CT, 01 NOT TO SCALE
:`R SHEET
u° z nb a C7.01
.f s°!mo ;'-a
~S~C
Copyright © 2004 by Carter & Burgess, Inc.

B. ~5. V11. NUI„ ~ IIIH
a
P I I -B O o~ ` ~ did W r b N f ~r:o
4' YELLOW INTERIOR STRIPING
AT 2' OC, TYP. 4' YELLOW 3'R STRIPES T 0 o.
55' 2' R 10' R YELLOW REFLECTIVE TRAFFIC PAINT, TYP.
WHEEL STOPS
MANOOOA STRIA OR COIIPACTOA - BY BC _ SECURITY FENCE SECURITY FENCE
w r FB 9 YELLOW REFLECTIVE [pryP REFLECTIVE 416HI STOP SIGN PAINT IW REFLECTIVE CPH IC PAINT
il' die' _ TRAFFIC PAINT E TYPICAL LOADING I
DOCK OOOA I TAAFF IC LANE f EDGE OF PAVEMENT N
w I ~ 10'R q• YELLOW INTERIOR 3 R iRAFF IC LANE PC 1'~ > 4' YELLOW STRIPES (TYP) 2'R STRIPING Ai 2' OC 1, pC I.5'
~ REFER iD OETpIL NOTES 2'-8' TSTOPSTL TSTOPSTOP s STCPH stcN
~ 55' 100' T~ 70' ~ - 7' -4'
m i ~ ~ .
4' YELLOW i ~ STRIPE g
~ TRAILER PARKING STRIPING DETAIL 2 ASSOCIATE PARKING STRIPING DETAIL P
- NOT TO SCALE - NOT TO SCALE 1 I 6'-4' ~•STAIPEW I'-2' YELLOW REFlECT1YE :LLOW 1[PE EDGE
TRAFFIC PAINT, TYP. OF PAVEMENT
AT GUARDF AT GUARDHOUSE AT STREET INTERSECTION
DETAIL NOTES DE I. SINGLE DIRECTIONAL AAROK SHALL DE PAINTED DETAIL NOTES: - 1. STOP SIGN MUST BE UTILIZED IN CONJUNCTION
ON THE TRAFFIC LANE CEHTEALINE. i• PORTLAND CEpfNT CONCRETE 2. DOUBLE DIRECTIONAL ARROWS SHALL BE PAINTED W[iH A 4000 PSI COMPRESSIVE 6' $YpSEIAICALLY ABWi TRAFFIC LANE CENTERLI~ WITH EACH STOP BAR SHOWN ON PLAN.
STRENGTH AT 2B DAYS 10rg' A DISTANCE OF I/6TH THE TAAFF]C LANE WIOTN 2• B, FROM THE CEHTEALINE. 2. STOP BAR SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE NORTH CAROLINA D.O.T. SPECIFICATIONS AND DETAILS, LATEST EDITION. c o - s
IR. A 1~4' 4 STOP BAR DETAIL
ASPHALT PAVEI£NT SLOPE 4 S~ • IR• R 3 DIRECTION ARROW DETAIL e - g«oic 'aaoo - NOT TO SCALE
d ~ ~ $L~E - NOT TO SCALE NO 'd PORTLAND CEMENT CONCRETE e ' 7•R d •e W[TH A 4000 PSI COMPRESSIVE ~ e ~
• STRENGTH AT 28 DAYS ~ Z O
e ~ TR • z e e ' . ~ ~ ° ~ REFER TO ' co U
e e. ~ e io PAVING e~ ~ e ° m DETAILS ~ ~ ~ c ~ REFER TO QZ
C7.01 e ~ ~ a • e a PAVING DETAILS a~ X O
18' Ci.01 COLD JOINT WE W 6)
CURB AND GUTTER DETAIL INTEGRAL CURB DETAIL OW
(ADJACENT TO ASPHALT PAVEMENT) (0 Z
12' PORTLAND CEMENT CONCRETE 3 w
WITH A 4000 PSi COMPAE551YE 91R' 57/4' PORTLAND CEMENT CONCRETE Ili6' 9U4' STRENGTH AT 28 OATS. WITH A 4000 PSI COMPRESSIVE U r
B' STRENGTH Ai 28 DAYS q`~' t4 BAA CONTINUOUS E%TERIOR FOUNDATION PALL •4 BAR CONi1NUWS ~ ~Q• SLOPE e6 BRAS AT 24' OC LL_
•6 DAR fl 24' OC THIS BAR MUST BE THIS DAR MUST BE PLACED AT PLACED AT THE TIIE DRILL & EPOXY
6' R. D A,, ~ THE TIME PAVING SECTION IS ° 'e PAYING SECTION I$ AGGREGATE !FETING SECTION 528 OF 3/4• POURED OA DRILLED AND POURED OR DRILLED THE NCDOT STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS, ~ - RE: 8/C-B DOWEL BAR RE: 8/C-6 J
SEALANT D ~ m GROUTED-IN AFTER THE PAVEMENT D,A AND CRCUTED-IN AFTER ' ~ p IS CURED, BARS NOT AEOUIRED a THE PAVEMENT I$ COMPACTED TO 95X OF MODIFIED TYP. D D THEN CURBS ARE TO BE d d e CURED, PROCTOR MA%IMAI DRY DENSITY _ _ _ _ _ _
INSTALLED WITH SIDEWALK -BY BC USTN D-15571 - BY SC d .G e e e ~ d v w
D ~ D n ~ D W d~ e~ o z _ GEOTE%TILE ' a- REFER TO ' ~ ~ FABRIC d ' • d ~ " ~ L D G_. _t 0Ce)
D ~ D^' ~ PAYING DETAILS ~ .e • e . e s 1 '0 ~ ' a' 1 - / 9, 9. C7.01 _ REFER TO \ 9• LL_ EXIST. CONC. PAVEMENT Z O
COLD JOINT PAVING DETAILS C1.01 PREMOLDED w CV FIBERBOARD ~Ej
MOUNTABLE CURB DETAIL 12' CURB AT COMPACTOR DETAIL W •6 x 18' DOWEL
BARS ! 18' OC Q w W
6 BUFFER ZONE 7 DOWELED CO' 5 STANDARD CURB DETAIL _ VEL ED CONSTRUCTION co
CT.D2 NOT TO SCALE C6.01 NOT TO SCALE J 0 I NT DETAIL NT DETAIL w
C6.02 SCALE) NTS C2.14 NTS
c o y m .z
L N W ~ 0
m 0 [ r ^ m J 9 `po l N
nlla z'. 0 - 1€ ~ ty O ~
t LL G C -2 E W 1¦ m C LL L 04T 'p `t$ 1
c O1 f i O t b N^
_ $
~ E 8 2 v=~
3 v uu
o
u
nm
R u~ o A:. ~
tm 5 On ~w
rc£
M 5 88 SHEET
~ - :9 g ~e A_ n, C7.02
~ s °u i i n. u
„ a 358 n0
s-a s5orc Copyright © 2004 by Carter & Burgess,Inc.

13A* DD GATE POST
3 STRANDS 'BARBED WIRE ~ GATE POST PLUNGER ROD d,.x•`~""•••.a„ WITH LOCK- _ _ABU- 1ATCM L _ __7•.
TOP AA II LOCK REOUIREO. - - `oa v sd
~--x- W w :o
BRACE POST
TURNBUCKLE STRETCHER BAR "'•^""'O",,
3 BARBED VIBES CORI~R POST ~ RACE OR ENO POST ^ TURNBUCKLE
~ TOP AAIL LINE POST TURN&1CKl i RAIL
a POST STRETCIffR BAA TEXSIOF MIRE Io LL 6' FENCE FABRIC PULL POST BOTTOM RAIL
~ TENSION MIRE ~9' ROO ' AOD STRETCHER
SECUi~ Ep AREp PUBLIC AREA BAA TENSION WIRE 34'R00
FINISHED CRATE ~ .b ~y~r_^ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ H ~ ~ ~ a ~ BflACE POST ~ I 1 r-~
o s o B'TH ICK X IB'W[DE CONC. ~ ~ ~a° ~ a = i a n BEAN N/ 2 W1 BARS AND )E CONC. JS AND °a
a ~ ~ Uz ~ > > FINISHED TLE BARS AT IB' I 0.. ~ ~ ~ a i CFLADE (FOR GRAVEL DRIVEL la-`-'I IE 1 a v
iv CONCRETE, TYP. ` is M o0 ..o na P i; c o 2' ID % IZ' LONG PIPE FOOTING AT E GRAVEL DRIVE
I'-4 I' ~ I ~ I 12 AT GRAVEL DRIVES Dla. DIA. 01A' DETAIL NOTES DIA. 2' :L DRIVES 12' AT GRAVEL DRIVES
I. MAXINIIM SPACING BETWEEN PIAL POST DIA. DIA.
AND/OR COINER POST [S 300'. 3LE SWING GATE AT
! SECURITY FENCE SECTION 2 SECURITY FENCE DETAIL Z SEE SPEC IFICATIONSEFaAEPOSiNSIZESTS 3 DOUBLE SWING CT. 03 NOT TO SCALE - NOT TO SCALE 3. THE AREA UNDER tHE FENCE SHALL BE CZ'13 GRAVEL FIRE GRADED TO A SMOOTH AIO UNIFg2M (EL FIRE ACCESS DRIVES DETAIL
GRADE WHICH WOULD ALLOW FOA A MAXIMUM OF 2' BETWEEN THE BOTiOX C2. 14 NOT TO SCALE OF THE FENCE FABRIC AND THE GiDIW10. KALE
4, PROVIDE STOPS TO HOLD GATES IN THE OPEN POSITION. _ d
5. L[IE POST NAT 8E OAiVEx IN LIEU OF CONCRETED IN PLACE A$ A BIO
ALTERNATE.
LENGTH (U
(SEE PLAN) FACE OF BLDG, SPACE POST ! 10' MA% aW<i<
AT FIRE PIBP ROUSE 24' % Z1' OCTAGONAL RiOVIDE E%TRA LENGTH STOP SIGN Ik'ADIWO POSTS AS REOUIREO. GATE POST WITH IQ' WROUND PLATE WELDED 1/4' WITH 'N s X 4' ROUND PLATE
HEADER S 12'XIB' .080 STANDARD UNIVERSAL HA~~;Lp7ICAP PARKING HEADER STUD z
~ SIGN WITX 2-'Jtl' DIA, CADMIUM 6' STD. T 7, O 6' STD. STEEL 6' STANDARD STEEL PIPE FILLED WITH PIPE PAINTED WITH o (n
S T 0 P BOLTS, NUTS ANO LOCKS. PIPE FIL - HINGES THIS SICK TYPICAL AT EACH CONC. F HANO]CAPPED PARKING SPACE. YELLOW F CONC. PAINT WITH YELLOW REFLECTIVE F Z Z YELLOW REFLECTIVE TRAFFIC PAINT
TRAFFIC lit' FI00 AND IURNBUCILLE BRACE AEOUTAEO FDR 8' STANDARD 'VAN-ACCESSIBLE' SIGN TRAFFIC PAINT Q a~ Xz
BOTTOM AAIL, REOUTAED AT YAN ACCESSIBLE, 190' W PIPE GATE AT FIRE PUMP NOOSE. PARKING STALLS ONLY FINISHE[ FINISHED FINISHED W O
LOCKABLE LATCH 2' DIA. GALVANIZED GRADE TENSION WIRE < BRACE W LOCK AEOUiFED STEEL POST GRADE GRADE r
W BRACE POST 4
~ e 10 STRETCHER BAA - ' 6 Y " m ~ TENSION WIRE 3 w
V 1/1' ROD FINISHED GRADE MIN. 401 STEEL APIPE I MIN. 4000 PSI MIN. 4000 U
ARt ~ COXCRETI CONCRETE PSI CONCRETE V LL
r FOOTING NOT AEOUIRED ~ ' I '~1 ,I BOTTOM OF FABRIC AT f IRE PUAP HOUSE
PAVEMENT SLAB Fai POST NE%T TO FACE iw „ - Of BLDG. r 1000 PSI CONCRETE I'-6' "v DIA. I •6' • . I -6' CA DIA DIA.
I. _1. J
~ DETAIL NOTES FABRICATE FROM 1.90' 00 PIPE, GALVANIZED STEEL. ASSEMBLE BY 1'-1 io DETAIL NOTES t. BOLLARDS i0 BE INSTALLED AT NOTES= < S TO BE INSTALLED AT DETAIL NOTES:
B' 5 SPACING UNLESS SHOWN DTHERI MELDING DA WITH WATEATICHT FITTINGS. DId. I AP PARKING SIGN SHALL CONFORM WITH 2. BOLLARDS AT ENERGY CENTER NOT DETAIL NOTES I. Xaeotc Y CURRENT STATE ANO LOCAL CODES ANO REGULATIONS. ASSOCIATED WITH %FIAT PROTECT II IS AT EN CENTER NO UNLERGYESS OTrHEERWISE. 1. SPACING SHALL BE 5' O.C. W cv) TED WITH XFMR PROTECTION UNLESS OTHERWISE SHOWN
I. All FENCE CRATE LOCATIONS AND LENGTH i0 BE FIELD VERIFIED. Dip, SHALL 8E B' o E%TENDING 5' ABI E 8' a EXTENDING 5' ABOVE FG. LL ZO
4 FENCE GRATE AT DRAINAGE 5 PEDESTRIAN GATE DETAIL 6 TYPICAL SIGN MOUNTING DETAIL T BOLLARD DE LLARD DETAIL 8 REMOVABLE ui
C HAN N E L CROSSING - NOT TO SCALE - NOT TO SCALE - NOT TO SCALE ro SCALE - BOLLARD DETAIL >LL1
NOT TO SCALE ~ NOT TO SCALE O W Er W
d =
W F-
cn
SYB' DIA. HOLES W/U!' DIA. % 10' LONG
ANCHOR RODS GRg1TED fN10 PAVEMENT. ~ Q FILL NiEEI STOP HOLES WfiH SEALANT. CT, D3
SIDEWALK BY BC Z. FACE OF BUILDING TYP PAVEMENT BY SC
Z N'
z PRECAST AEINfOACEO PRECAST REINFORCED H ~a s
I q I 6' LONG WHEEL STOP ~ ~ B' LONG WHEEL STOP 3 13, mF 3, I 3, 15' MIN. HEICHTI ¢ 1, A, IS' MIN. HEIGHT) w °
m 2' I I B TYP, m 1.1„n° ~ `g 3F
' 6' ' 6' 1' STRIPE 9 C O t m , L a V LL L tUS O
EIX1AL ~ EQUAL EQUAL ~ EQUAL PARKING STALL 0 m~ LL r ~
TYP, ~ 8 HAIR !CAPPED o ma~~ of -
X 8 PARKING STALL 4' STA IPE B' M[N. _E , n
F TYP FILL WITH SEALANT ~ Z 2-~5 BARS x
~ 3 HANDICAPPED AREA TRAILER AREA PAVEMENT N a V dv
DETAIL NOTES
a ~ I. REFER TO LAYOUT AND DIMENSION PLAHS FOR PARKING OR [LL Ih' HOLE STALL DIMENSIONS AND DIMENSIONS OF WHEEL STOP IN PAVEMENT FOR ROD ~ - FROM PAVEMENT EDGE OR FACE OF BUILDING.
3 c F 2. WHEEL STOPS NOT AOJ0.CENT TD BUILDING SHALL ANCHOR ROD ~ ~ BE PAINTED YELLOW.
~ y_ Ut' DIA. % 10' LONG ~ Wm
" P DETAIL SECTION ~ 9 PRECAST CONCRETE WHEEL STO !0
~ - NOT TO SCALE CT.03 NOT TO SCALE a
~ 8~ a SHEET [
~ (J 4.. n UZ ,~j O U
I 2 „b ~ C7.03
r7 iano £s^a
3i~o: Copyright © 2004 by Carter & Burgess,Inc.

_
_ _ _ _ R _ x a ~ e~ _ _ BENCH MARKS: _1- TOW-,CAP-$_ ..aRON:-ROB M1-TM CAP
21544.44 ~ ~ N t4 43 E 9184.41 S BI .41 ~ ~ 6 CORNER N 21102.21 oa b,,r E 9622.15 ELEVATION 488.78 W r
~ N CORNER N ~ f W 2. TBM - CAP 9, 4' IRON ROD WITH CAP • °d v,2'
a$ 21454. T8 E 8 E 9094.4 COIBER N 20977.38 •tia r,b E 10436.94
s N 21424.21 i 8 g S E 9310.28 ~ k II q CORNER y+. ELEVATION 490.84 3. TBM - CAP 11, 54" IRON ROD WITH CAP
y y y N 21472.43 E 9112.41 ti~'• N21~413R4 N 20222.19 E 11115.25
~ q CgiNER E 9528.582 q CORNER N 21442.71 N 21364,40 I ~ ~ ~ ~ E 9106.36 N 21~J29A7T 1 E 10713.57 ELEVATION 477.97 '0 BMsI BENCHMARK INFORMATION FROM SURVEY
~ ~ ~ £ 3 q q q E 9669.65 '7 AT NCGS MONUMENT 'VANCO' N 23021.07, E 11203.26
i ' N 21~SIB. 05 q CINtNER i N 21274.89 C CORNER ELEVATION 513.07 1 21274.89
E 9460.2A E 10771.52 10771.52
s .2 • ' q COAI~A ~ ~ t~~,~~E BO~,'0 CORNEA ' N 21192.90 Q CORNER N 21192.90
a b, •yh of N 21168.67 5_ Y~ w_ ~a" I~ E 9955.70 oy o E 10828.89 h E 10828.89
~ G ~ARDHOUSE a>"',a~ r e CORI~R Q CORNER
t N 21111.20 , ! E 10886.72 5 q CORNER ~ N 21111.20 E 10886.72
- -FaAE. PUMP HOUSE 26'89' N 21014.97 eCORNER, ' E 10459.47 CO Q CORNER
- ~ N 2097 .6i '~\t-._`.'..___..-.._:.._ - , TRUCK--S ~ z1 N 21028.17 g E 10942.53 d
~ a f' ~ _ ~ _ - - r - _ _ , . %"+~s_ _ - . . . ~ r . g _
, . _ - _ - - 2088LS1~ - _ r - Q CORNER N 20941.94 E 10993.26 -
E 8 91.35 'y' .p
~6 ~ fv^yo.27 ~ ~ \ \ V' ~ ~ ~ 1 ~ I j;'E:8585;TS----°--------------'-------•-- \ 1 ,v I II I f ' j I I Q CORNER ° N 20851.40
~ ~ ail ~ I III!; I ~ ; 1 E 11035.78 - o , z
~ ~ °`N 20875.77 „ I ~ ~ ~ E 8540.17 _ - 1 t ~ ~ ~ ~ - TRAILER PARKING a Q CORNER
_ . . y N 20758.08 3 ez E 11072.01
. ,,,t I ~ I~ I{
---...__...J1,i I I?I is •i. Q CORNER 'd'i oi°1c`e N 20662.62
-__.r ' I I I I I I I I I E 11101.88
~ ~ ~ ' ' - 1- -I'-. ~'--I _~_,~__,.~.__-1-'-I'-~7~--;- -I-. ~ , ! I I I I I ( I ( I ( I I 71 1i Q CORNER O
a ~ I ( I °i N 20565.84 i' E 11127.25 0 C/) U
i I I I I l I I I I I I l E x .i. i. ~ a ~ RAILER PAR ING - i - - - - - ~ - - - - - - - - s z z
' ~ ~ '!i E -I- 1- I I I I 1 I I I ! t; i CORNER N 20467.68 Z
R ~ i ~ } k : I i - - - - - - - - - - ~ ~ ~ r r; E 11146.56 x O i~ W CO
_ i i i i i DIY ~O~DS` z~ ~ ~ CORNEA , ~ ` i i i ~ ~ ~ - - - - - - R Y _ i~ 8 N 20334. I I i. . ~ . ~ ~ _ - - - i ~ t
E 7913.4 , t' ~ TRACTOR ; ; ; ; ~ ~'F ;EL.~ 4~0. • 5 ~ ~ I ~ ~ ` ` Q CORNER W N 20368.63 E 11160.78 O
I~ € ~ ~ ~ TMG PARKING i rFUEL' i 'I- r- - i ~-i- ISLAND , ~ ~ - "
y ~ ~ I. I I I_ i r I 1 i i i , rosy s ~ - I ~ FUELi STORAGE , ! Q CORNER U - - I N 20269.10
3~ v Sss, ~ I 1 I I 1 I I J 3i o' t ~ a ~I I I -~I - - " ~ ~ ~ pS~ i I I ! f f Q ' . r 0 E 11170.40 LL.
, E I~ & ~ R f` ' i ~ ~ I I ~ ~ § 4 i .__T______a 4 ; ~~I ~ (i;~ ~ [ ~ ly i I I I ( I i i I i i~ j ~ ~
I,., 7 r T E Q CORNER I N 20169.21
rz I i ~ EI - ,N ecoAxEA ~ - READ`-LINE ~a~ ~ .i r r'-~~._.i i._.i__.._._i,_ _.i _ _ . - I~ ~ ~ ~ N 20127.35 ° ..i-snr:-~---- " - ' ' . ' t E 11175.84 Z a
- - E 8215.02 ' ` - _ ' I I = I I I I I i~ 3 3 N~ Q CORNER CL
a ~ I ;',"y I I 1 1 E I i I I i ! ~ ' N 20069.27 E 11180.09
' :il ~ I ~ I ; ; ° • AREA .a. i._ i ._i_ i--', - - -
~ I' ~ ' ~ r_~•.~•. - I _ ~ ~ .r. _ i _i i i i i i i e ~ i i a r I I i I I I I i i ~ ~ I I ( I i ! h b , Q CORNER J r N 19969.27
~ R N 1 I .A -i I t'~ I ~~j~, i E 11183.49
" Z ~ I I I I I 1 I. 'i ~ , i I I I I i I I I I ~-'I'UD= ° 4
7 p P ~ I Y i I I I I 1 1 1 1 1 I I I I I A'--~ - \;'q ~ _ - J b :c ~ ( ~ ~ ! I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I I I a - i'O ~ v o j «--q EORNER ! Q CORNER '--I N 19846.72
isi € ~ ' ~ I ~ I I I i r iR~FR~IGERA~TI(JN I---~•--i--.~--~T~r ~r-- w,,,~.~~ 4 ~ ' .~~.79eae.az:.::'"~'•° E 11187.92 a
S 1' i ~ -~I- j ~ ~ ._1 ~ - - - - _ ~ ~ 306. TI' !S ~ ~ ~ I - - - ~ j I ~ ---+h---~----~i--- - - -.~RFA B- I ! .T. - a a.' 'IA~Ea ~j1 ~ (1i 4'11 ~ ~ ~ ~ ' n.' 306.74'_ W 4' 10'W S 12
i 6 6 6 ~ ~ W ~ --r -1- E 1 -E- -E-~- T -1~--~---4~--+~-~~~-~+ t~--~~-- ;I 'c~ , ra d1~1! ' Y Y Y , I J -ti .-I I -I -I I I 4 I j ~ I I I ! I f l I ,,r~ lft.~ I~ ~'ii~ i f Q CORNER Q N 19724.36
i I - ~t- - - - - - - _ - - ~ a ro i i I i " T1, E ;1192.34
j ~ ; ~ le ~ L~NE~GI" CENTER I I r -r~r ~r- , 'av ' ~ ; „ , ~ ~ ~ i ~ ~ I I • 1 , I-1-,L.! I _ I I - i i - i v`v.1 v`..1 aal~ 2% R I ~ -I- j -J-'-~~A-f I' - a ,a~ a a a ~ ~~iii iii N82°A2' 296.71
{ de»r- l rP ...rl. ~ _ i t ~ ~ ' R~,i~ eCORNER N 82°42'32-E Q CORNER I
~ ~ p s~ I ~ . _ i ? i ~ ~ 1 s ~ ~ N I %86.70 d ~ u ~ I ` I ' 1 ~ ~ ' ~ a n i E I OB9B. 02 ' : t 1 l N 19686.70 E 10898.02
~ r ~ ~ ~i X4.7 l , , , I . ~ ' I Q CORNER N 1962437 E 11195,.95
. . - -E---_____-------~---- r .~+s-- ! I r-- --I Iii - aTE
, ~ ~ ~ ~ „PARKING ' TRAILER PARKING 1 t' ~ y
, f' I t ~ , W ~
' ~ .i..: . .aa...u...usssn.u.ua. ~ ~,Sd~9~55~"4 , O 1 ( m 0[ aX~ m tz,gb p- F
- ,,..i a _ i , . . r , Z ti t o n v
i ~ i , ~.T~ ,,r ._-___.--.„~i~ p m a t ~
S ~ I i ' E C 0 ' 1 g V- 35° 00'00" g m /
g ~N p q CORNER , _ - _ y N N 19235.89 I . 1 ~:E o~- PLAN TRUE NORTH
' ~ y c E 8580.00 `uz n I y" u o ...._-m.._ ,aira»ass.aa.rssaea ri` ii , i rc NORTH ° v L u 2 C
4 fi N " v .26 V v
a m
~ !r ~ $ ' h 01 N
o~ a w ` ,t t~ ` ~ Sba i O m
a ~ ~ q CORNER d C
~ ~-8i a 933.33__ N 19016. B4 ~ ~ e~ : q CORNEA N 90°00'00'N E 9975.58 d 2 i
+ + y_~,~ a N 18974.94 a CORNER g~ ; E 8959.76 N 189]4.94 U Z
E 9693.09 SHEET U 0
° I OVERA - LL UTILITY PLAN 3aeO -a C8.01 SCALE: I' 100' 0 100 201 300 400 m2wwseg
~~oe GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET ~ C8.1 ° 0 0
3 /
Copyright © 2004 by Carter & Burgess, Inc.

_
_ - - _ _ _ _ _ S 54°32' 44'E 1
~ = 18 .41 BENCH MARKS:
. } ~ $ S H CORNER _ 21539.45 8 E 9191.42 N 21102.21 fRONR00 WiTN.CAP...,.__._... P j E 9622. 15 f,; s .
n 7 ~ / ~ i ELEVATION 488.78
~ N 21~R93 ~ ~ E9112.41 2. TBM - CAP 9, 5A' IRON ROD WITH CAP 1 N 20977.38 ' ba E?' S E 10436.94
R COANER N 41'S4'S4'W 1 ELEVATION 490.84 •N~ l,•a``•~
6 ~ ~ N 21454, 16.88' ~ d E 9094 3. TBM - CAP 11. 5M' IRON ROD WITH CAP 1 N 20222.19 E 11115.25
e CORNER E 91N~328 S ELEVATION 477.97
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ it `Sou , BM*I BENCHMARK INFORMATION FROM SURVEY `T2• tj AT NCOS MONUMENT 'VANCO'
# ~ ~ 25.2i' 9~f e CORNER N 23021 0, E 11 9~F E LEVATION7513.07203.26 J
8 ~ N S 44°45' lT'E N 21442.11 16.95' E 9106,36 :rs ~ ¢Q m
e~ f
r- r- r- r„ J 1
i
L i N CORNER ' N 21348.05`
~ E ~ ~ /J E 460.20 i 1 F
Py R Cy ~ 1
6 , z ' I
f ~
k ~ ~ ~s A p 11
` ,h C 8 ~ 8 , ~be5°j 1 tv
bbS 5 d ~ ~ R ~ ~ I ~
~ ar ~ ~ b I
~ 6 d ~ I 1 t 3
~ 5P GUARDHOUSE ~ ~ x ' FF EL. 4 SE =emu . m3
83.23 P a ~ ~s ~ i~ ; ; , 1 , 1.23 r
i r„ Y.. r- 1 ' - - € IU ao,oi cis i ' ~ 1 Lil
. - ~ t ~ I Z
4 w o - iZ
~ N4 _ a --L------"-------1- o 00 pv Z Z
11 1. Ic 1-- Q d I( Z
~ ~ p ~ ~ 4 - ~b 1, p ' - i 'X 0
!S. ~ ~ _ _t _ yyx w 5 b 3 ~ o . . N 2097 , 1 o rw
C CORNER o GW 8 ` i ~_i. rn
~E 3 E 84881. Z ) _ 9I 20896. T FW - ' - 3 CD W
- • I q9 E 8585z~75 d S d ~ 9 U
5 849.18 ~ r,'~ ~ ~ R 31T~"E 1 Q i LL
d $ ~ i jp , g'fOANEW 1
3 ~ ,.'N 20jlTS. Ti F•
~ ~ 1 Z
~ , - s~ i sg r i i Q
e9 r- r_ Sa i 1 J 1(L
, t . SOTTO... - -j J
~ R ~ - M.ELw_X463.0--------..._----------------------•-- F-
n . n Q 1
^ ~ BOTTOM ~a 463:0'----------
a ay` ~ I •------------------------1 Q
CIPki. BASE . • • - _ _N..28616. 42 - _ nI
_ I4 861 I ~~dA ---`CLSd89:8'2 Q e
q ~ q i .1 ~ ~ ~ 4 ; 1
A 1
x ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 1
3s 3g ~ S yy yyy CONNECT NEW CONDUIT s j
AAA ~Ah ' N AHD WIAINC i0 EXISTING = $ s.. PULL BOX r TING 35° 00'00"
~ ~ N 20441.42 ~ E 4 9 58.25 PLAN TRUE NORTH
~ ADJUST TO BE FLUSH ~ f WITH FINISHED GRADE f ~ ' -J 1 NORTH y
~ ` ll.l ~H~ „ ~ ~ I R ~ i ~d
2t 7{ 8 ~ ~ ~ ~ a ~ p 3i t O ~m
R E ~ 3 ~ ~ C CORNER ~ ~ 3
~ ~ : N 20334.6 ~ g i ~ B ~ 3 E 7913. , ~ ~ ~2 $ f i m ~ d ~ ~ E 0 pa 9 J§
~p 9 ~ l ~ S r `a:. .I ~ c y`!aAn i 4
3t s~ m ~ j! ~ ~ ' y a a s r~ ~ - ~ : 1 = cj- j 1 `oU i ;2
x ~ m~ . ~ ~ ' i. a- ~ 'L' _i_._._i_._._._._._._._._._._. - ss i
i ~ im y MATCH LINE AE C3.13 1 ~ c c 4..- -JO 50 100 150 200
• y rcr GRAPHIC SCALE W FEET
e i
! j C~ E '1 4- 4. ~ rU
U 1 " 1 L I_
a 1 AREA 1 - UTILITY PLAN ~a"O C8, 11 SCALE: I"=50' i• 'I SHEET '
:;a ~50& KEY PLAN
C8.11
COpyr[ght © 2004 by Carter & Burgess,Inc.

I
j . . , I _ _ BENCH MARKS
i 4._.4BM-.__C4R,8,- {N9N-RW wuN CAP ~ ~ - N 21102. 21
E 9622.15 ELEVATION 488.78 u~ w W
R s~ ~ ~ i ~ ~ o I T ~ 8 I N on G7 2. TOM - CAP 9, 54' IRON ROD WITH CAP N 20977.38 d'••..,,_,.•~•p``•~
~ ~ ~ LINE TABLE i E 10436.94 0~'I 4i N;,••`~ ELEVATION 490.84
~7 ~ ~ j OANEA LINE L@gTH BEARING E ~ § 424.27 L7 106.63' S 32'S1'S9'E 3. TBM - CAP 11, 519' IRON ROD WITH CAP N 20222.19
j ~ SI0.28 9 59°20'02'E La 100.01 S 31•SB'S5'E I E 11115.25 ELEVATION 477.97
21.28' L9 100,09' S 35.1T37"E ~ ~ t ! ' * CORNEA Lta g0.05' S ]3.5425"E BMOI BENCHMARK INFORMATION FROM SURVEY AT NCGS MONUMENT 'VANCO'
d d zf ~ 21413.42 ~ ~ ~ J E 9528,58 L11 q0.0/' S 30'28'24"E N 23021.07, E 11203.26 ELEVATION 513.07
~ Lit 100.03' S 15.OBST'E
} ~ ~ ~ I 118 80.03' S 25.08, 7' [CORNER 1 ~ ~ ~ 1. 6~ p 5 ~ N 21364.40 iiii iii iii L14 q0.q• S 2Mt3'q"E E 10713.51
3t ~ Y 1 p L75 gO.OJ' S TI.22'4T'E x ~ ~ e coANER DRAWING NOTE: 1. ADJUST ALL PULL BOXES, GATE VALVE BOXES,
' ~a i f N 21329.71 Lta 80.05' S K•/124"E \ ~ ~ E 9669, 65 ~ o MANHOLE RIMS, ETC., TO BE FLUSH WITH FINISHED GRADE.
e' e`~ e ! L17 gO.DT S OB•q'1TE i ~ w 4~ 4@ I L18 99.99' S DS'3TM'E t1
I ~t I \
I ~1 ` e CORNEA \ N 21274.89 z
I / , `y E 10111.52 / \
R R n I d? s c~ R j S 60e B Jp. ~ n 8 16•,
6 I ~f
G e CORNER Z [CORNER I N 21168.67 / Y N 21192.90
~ i ~ ~ j E 9955.10 py ~ E 10828.89 o z
I ,o`
./f ~ 6 1 ? C~ f9 oe
~ ~ ~ ~ / rl \ ~ ~ ~ ~ ` E coflNER zom~a~o~
~ ~ ~ U! ~ E 10886.12 ?20 Wm~s~i~o o 72
llll - 5 I3 76.5y~ 3j ~ (t, p2'p1.
€i R $ $ I E / ~ ~ ZI N 21011.97 Z
s{2 s6 i~ ~La - E 10459.11 ~ O
. " ; - . _ , e CORNEA - - _ \ N 21028, IT p. E 10912.53 -N 2028RIT Z Z E 10942.53
Q d Z
~6 w O
_ . _ , ag ~ ~ ~ q-. ` ~ N 2091 , Q CORNER Q N 20941.94 Q
` w ~ t 1 . _ ~ E 1099. Z E 10993.26 Z
3 ~ 1 , L- ~ ,g ~-r~ r A 1 i ' t • U
LL
i 1= `~,,9i ~ ~t 1 ~ ~ ICHT P \ 1 ~ ~ i , `.ElSE X G 0 l - i II
C CORNER N 20851.40 E 11035.78
~ I ~A~ , ~ 's + ~ 1, ~ 8ASE7 Pq,E IICHT POLE LBAGH POL ~ >r I RAILER PARKING BASE ~ FIRE P IFfYIP, 1; RENOVE b N 20921.25 N 20921.25 v ~ ~ I Z ` i - N 20921.25 l- \ °c' ~ NELOCAfE E 10069.18 E 10310.92 E IOSS2.65 1' ~ + Z
HOUSE ~ ~ v EX15T, LP '\~;1 1, - ,,,z c ! N 20858.23 it J e- IL
Yy y Y I - ...............'-..-~F_Lt; X478. ' I E 9811.42 jr { FH
~ t 12'x6'TEE N 20757. T5 FH ; I i III 1 $ ~ ~ N20T57.T5 PULLBO% ',y + 12'90°8EN0 N 20723,75 E 10251.70 12'x6'TEE E 10631.10 ° N 20820.42 ~ 1 1 s it ; I N 20723.75 12'90 BEND i F}-
~ 1 , E N 20723.75 ~ E 10257, TO E 10631 7 E 10900.76 ; t + ' "8 ~ ~ ( E 9983.42 I r ~ 0 N 20123. TS ~ t , r~ '1 CORNER J N 20758.08 E 11072.01
i ~ „ ~ ~ ~ E 10693.75 ~ ~ I - n ~~3 STA. 0 66.11 LAf A-6 ~ ~ ~-q i , - ENO b PLUG LINE - ,i ' t ~ +c
' 1 IN 2069 .58 2 I I t 2 ~ ~ ~ i 'j 1 REIbYE' b' i I E 9980j42 q f.______°m_..___________._.__- RQCOCA~'E ~ ~ PULL BO% , i , ~ t ! N 20680.00 E ' 1 I
R R 8 N 2065j1.98' ~ F I i ' E 10900.16 ti N
!r --£°9826,42 ; _ 1 I I I i r-------- FH ~ i I I I 1 ' i t~ 1 ~ ~ ~ y ~ ~ N 20783.46 ~ 12'x6'TEE ~ ~ 1 , _ 4 L2' I' _ N 20103.461 I I I i 1 I 1 I I f I 2'x8'TEE i' i
ty E 9931.42 E 9983.12' , ~ b ~ - P . , ~1 I ND CONOlIiT _ 20637.08 L-pint ; _4t POLE,' i I I I 1 1 I i I I 1 H N 20662.62 w ' E 11101.88
iR~ ~b g I°-- - - BASE ! I - - - - - 20680:00. 10693. T5 i i ~ A tl ~ ~ II___ - N20616.92, I 1 -.I. FPR I i j.- ._j E 10680.175- - , i ~ v ~ ~ E 97 0 , ~ n !S~ ',IHE - - flE:l/CB.31 • t ~ Q
` i I 9' N 2060 58 I I 4 I I I I ~ a ~ $ ' - - - I t'. STA.I 0.58 LI -4 E 1000.16 I I I I ~ ~ i i i ~ ~ ~ I I I I ! ~ i LIGHT POLE
y 3 ! ~ I I CONNECk LATER ~ ~ • ~ BASE ~ ' ~ y Y 1 ~ ~i flE:10% BJI I I I I I I ! I I I f N 4 O7 i~ v e vn CORNER Q
~ $ ' i ~ [NSTAL~ CLE - - - -'AERI/C~~' r E 10900.76 i ~ 3 3 I - I~ 1 I I. _.I . I i I ( I i @ 3 ~ 1 I t I ~ r { ~ N 2063',4.42 ~ 13:00' N 20637, 0 t` I I, I I~ E 998 42 iPR I I I I I € I I. I I I E 10671,4 1 1 I CORNER
s iw ~ j i i ( ~ i I 1 w~ ~'~i _ ~E:I/C8.31 I I I i I I ± ! I I ( 12'x8'iEE it N 20565.84 E 11127.25
d ~ ~ ~ - 1r •rEE 14,Oa 29S28.sa + ` - N 20529.08 1 ' N 20609,58 I E IOOOj.76 I I I I I I i ! I I E 10693. T5 ~ TRAI R PARKING I E 9 3.,2 - - - - - - - - t ~
1 I i i I ~i ~ I' I. ~ I I DRY GOODS I I i I 8 j REMOVE b _ I I I I I ( I I i i I I i~ N` 35° 00'00"
flELDCarE ~ AREA A - - - % T P - I ~ ~ 1 t, j E 15 L ~ 12'x8'1 STA. 0~I9.73 LAT A-5 ( ( I 1 F i I I I~ 4 ~8 ~ N 2044L42 ,N 20528.58 ENO 5 PLUG IINE. 12'z6'TEE ~ ~ PLAN TRUE NORTH y t', M 1 y
` FF EL. 480 65 ~ _ '~,a' ~ ~ [ s i °s "s I E 9826.42 _ _._._L_._._.~._._.J._._._.I_._._,J„_,_._:_._,_.i._._._l_-_. _.L._._._1._.FP,R._.'._. N 20449.88 F ~ ~ q~ ~ 1 ~ IE 9983. 19' - '-N'2040t:08 _ RE:I/C~. E 10693.1 °--°---1 t ' N " E STp.I*40.58 L E 99[0.12 I I I I 1 I I I I f N 2052.08 5 i; E R CORNER NORTH 8 E N 20467.68 1 .9 1
It ! TRACTOR PAR ' NG , ? CONNECT LATER - , , i FH y t , 1 i t y I ~ ~ ~ RE!10/CB.31 12'x8'TFE ~ f J 1 I I I ! t E 10677.42 N 20449,88 Z i~ " E 11146.56: w v c 1 O V m ; ; t t La C°. em
' ~ ( ~ ~ -a ~ . INS$ALL CLEAN 1 ~ ~ ~ , I . L 1 N 20392.29 ] I I I 1 I ( I 1 i E IDi42.T6 i~ ~ N 20916.92 E 9983142 jjtt 5c 8~ r } - i ° lLLf v
- E 997. .-'-'-I----~1---._ ~ FPR Y~___~7 ' f I 1 -1._ ..4.- '-I----.1 _ -'-i- - -~L - - RE:18.31 ~ 1 i ; + ' _ ~ ~ / . + 6' SS L1 E A-3_,... fPR a ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ N 20 7.08 + ' ~ _ I i i I I 1 1 [ ( t Q s ¢,o m. -a cl ~mmaLLW C.
R ~ ' _ i , I FH RE: I/C8, 31 FPO E 102.42 1 ~ + N 20866.58 I I I I I I I 1 I ) N 0- t+ h ~ ~ I -'°xl - N 20392.29 ~ RE:I/C8.~1 • t 0 ca°6°i°° a E R CORNER a a« R 4
# °1>am ' E 9934.42 E 10004.75 N 12'x8'1EE I , ~ I 20312. j8 1 I ! I I ) i I I N 20361.08 ~ r k? E I I q 14:00' E 10004.75 , ~ 12'x8'TEE _ ~ ~ E 10693.15 L[GHT POLE =d N 20368. 1 0 t_ u AE E 11160:7 1 c o='_ a
7 I I N20366.58 Y~.. -'i---•-'-h-._._.I-.---'-i'-'----I_._.-'-t~-'-'-i----.~._'_._t_._._.t-._._.-.._._._.~. W i ABASE `f ~ ~ 1 E 9983.42 - FPA J s ,N 20404. 8 ~ ~ S j 1 I I E I I ( I 1 1 I I~ AE:1/C8.31 - rE-7O.~p6~ _ 9 0 9. °u Fn i 1J
8 R~ j I I tt'x8'iEE I I I i 1 I I I I 1 1 9 N 20340.08 Q i ~ ,x ~,y y I N 20312.58 E 10672.12 ~ _ 00
8~ I ~i~ i.. 14` ~I~ $ e~ ~ ~ a I I~ E 9983.42 ~ '00~ I I I I I ! I 1 ( I I 12'x8'TEE F-' t~~ 4 5 5 . a o e ~ n: -i--- - - r--- - - N 20340.08 1 i V m a
_.~,_._,~._._._1_._._.i._._._ E 10693. 5 cl } ' ` 0 50 100 150 200 o
~ MATCH LINE RE C8.14 y N ~ ~ R b GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET c
° o c
~a ~ iii ~ e' 1 c a
x ~ . T' Im z
s i °nu z I - / - -•i•-•-•I SHEET c 4
" ° ~ AREA 2 -UTILITY PLAN ;e~ z KEY PLAN
o C8.12 SCALE: 1'=50' `o "m C8.12
i5o`z 3 /
Copyright © 2004 by Carter & Burgess,Inc.

MATCH LINE RED C8.14 T _ BENCH MARKS
I 12'90° BEND • - ~ + . _ 1 ~ I I ,
_ a.. ._.._i._ G _ ryT - _ _ , +A693-t5. - _ _N' 20240:29 r i... N, t.. 1 ! I I I i 1 I I I I I_ I ff r•'x al - E 10142. i6 r I r i _r-_, J N 21102.21 •No P~
I I TMG "W 1~ I I I I I I I ~I~ I ~I I I~ i~ '1 ~ + . 1 + i j., , a 3 B Q I' ~ 11 I ~ ! I I ! ! I I I I I ° ' 'S' ~ ~ " ` G C CflRNE E 9622. 15 M ,g w, s r , N 0269. 0 ELEVATION 488.78 W '1a { . E 1170. 0 •:o gy'm' 2•y
j yq ~ i ° ~ I S STING SEVER i i ' N220252~~D ` `~-r ' ~ re A EL 69. B3. I I ! I I ( I I ~ i, + , t 2. TBM - CAP 9, `-08• IRON ROD WITH CAP •;d„ ' N 20977.38 F
3 i IrrELD YERIFYI , E 10715,1 + , s , , ; O ~ ~ I i i ! 1- - ~ -'-•-I ~ ~ I---._.~.---'-~-•-'-' ~ ---'-I-'-'--='---• ~-f2"91°-BENB._ _ ~o 'x6'TFE + + ~ r + , , E 10436.94 ELEVATION 490.84
N s I " i N 20172.7 ~ ' + ~ I 1° I I I I f I I I I I 5 I 20240.29 Y + gi n, (p , I E 10693.?5 ~ i , r~ , ~ ~ 1 n I I ~ I 6' S5 lI E n-( i I I i I I I I 1 I IO7t°5.42 ~ 3. TBM - CAP 11, 5W IRON ROD WITH CAP j CID ' i N 20222.19
8 p 1 + , PR . FPR ~ . _ 90 RENO + ~ ii i ~ $ ~ I 12'x8'7 RE:I/C6131 1 I I I ; DR`~ GOO~S i N 20172.75 Q ' + i m ~ci ' 1 I I f RE I/C6.31 n ` i It CORNER 1 E 11115.25 ' ' ' E 1/175. i ELEVATION 477.97
~ y° ~ ' ' ' c ~ I N 20129.(56 rv N 20129.56 ' N 20129.56 E 10715.42 ~ + ~ r a e + F + .I - I° z Q1 I E 9963. -E-10904.i5...__.1-._._._L-._.-.L._.-.J._._._.1_._._~EA...Ai_._._.1. -.-.-t-.-.-.L._._._LE-186T .4 ' --ia - i w ~ I ~ . 2' Ir 12'x6'TEE `Lj(~T P0.E t ~ W~ ' w BMo1 BENCHMARK INFORMATION FROM SURVEY AT NCGS MONUMENT 'VANCO'
r ~ ~ i 12'45°BENO 6.00': 1 I I ( I { i ! I 1 I+~ kn N 20129.58 ~ +BAbE I FF E~. 480.65 ' $ o = I N 20121.6 ' h E 10693. T5 W 'N+Y0161;259 I i ' ' 1 m x~ l { I I I I I I I I I i i I 19.00' u ~ ~ ~ ~ i+,1 ~ E 9983.4 J ; E' 10900: Tfi ~ ~ ~ N 23021.07, E 11203.26 ELEVATION 513.07
i. ~ ' CC '1 ~E ] I 1 I I 1 I I I 1 I I Q " ~ I ~ ` ~ ~ I 6' SS LL4E 9 I i 6 S. ~iNE 6, + ~ III f O F N J
, 4-5 I I C o'
J ' y~ ~ ~--~w-~-, ~ Ck~- -.YIET TAPW A I I { I I I ! i i ' " 'm' e CORNER DRAWING NOTE= 1 N 20069.27
fi N k - ~i - - I `i ~ ~ VALVEATE ~ ! I I E%15TINC u(9dI PDI,E d I I 1 { n ~ ~ 1 r _ 1 91 $ $ 3~ ~ _ ? ter. --'-i- - - - - -._.flA$$E JQ 9E.BE~yFgy - ~i E 11180.09 1. ADJUST ALL PULL BOXES, GATE VALVE BOXES, MANHOLE RIMS, ETC., TO BE FLUSH WITH FINISHED GRADE.
~ FN t'.4 FW .r .rt_ REPLACE YITN XEW P0.L f .T.. I. .r.. + + „ i ~ ;e I t I I [ 80 AND CONNECT NEN I ~ Plll 60% ! I ~ r 2. CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE
I2 90°BENO ELECTRICAL NIR[NG TO N 19995.4 ~ r , 1 ~ € IN 19963.42 ( E%15TING SERN;ICE, I I 4 I ~ , , 'E 10215.63 N 19960.42 ~ E 10 92.5 ~ i + WITH VAL-MART PRIOR TO N DISCONNECTING ANY UTILITY SERVICE.
1 E I I I E 10492.65 I ~ i I I r' J Q
1.. _ ~ I 1 - _.I-._ _ C~. , I I I- I I ( I I I II ~ 1 12' _ _ e• CORNER 19969.27 E 11183.49
R a i t i i i i i i i i AREA' r~ a - , ~ tr R I I ~ ,
~ b N 19995.42 b a I i I i i i i € i 1~}b_ ~ i ~ L,r._,~,._;y:~._a:-.1.x.._._:_:_1_._._-_6_~_~_~_ _ _ _ _ _ _ I, #2'x6'TEE 12'90°BEND CONNECT TOE%ISTINC g i 1 ~ _._._._k_:_:_:_k=:,I:=:=: d. I 'I-;~I^ 1 ! 19983.42 N 19967.42 LIGHT POLE d,
' 1 ? 1 I I I I I 1 1 1 tf ~ , ff'sf N -
• I I F 4 s ~ ,10542,75 _ .__...^g IDfi93.?S__Ji,I9480_42__._--•-'-•• < FH E 10737.02 ~ ~ 1 € f I I I 1 I 1 N 19967.34' ~ a I~ ~ ~ I I I ' , ~ N J
I I I I I I I I \ E 1054`2115 i..I_.-.!.-._._.-•-•- _ - - - - 67.0 I t CORNER 1
! ! ~ i I I ~ ~ OTTOM E y°ff N 19846.72 E 11187.92
3~~ i ( I 1 1 I I I I I G a I a. a ~ - ge ms a~og~
ri f i ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ e CORNER .14' ~i~ N I I I I I I I 6 ~ I~ 1 1 ti.~= ~ i , N I9@08,EZ~~~ 306 306.74• vi Si io oo
I I 1 I i I I' ~ ° i ' i i •-E-NBB3.53 _~q 10'Y • -~iEFRIC#~RATIC~.N--~-- ` I ~ ~ , S 62-54' 10' W J J_
x~ a Ecr I I I I I I I -i i 4, I c, : a O U
w~ i i i i i AREA B i i i i q- a~ ~ ~ - T ~ - ~ _ ~ r 0 7
~ 'S ~I ~ ( I I I I I i I ~ ~ ~ ' ' °w / v i_ y.. y_ Ii I i 1 I 1 I I i I $ F+~I ~ 1 u " i i~ ~ a m co U N 19724. t CORNER _ Z Z N 19724.36 ¢
v I i ~ ~ Ga ASSOCI~T ~ ING ~ ~ ucHr,'da~, ~ ~ i ~ ~ FI ~ I I i I I i E - BASE + i ~ ~ E 11192.34 H
~rJ_._.!.-._,i.._._ 6 , ~ 4 r~i N 1978.56+ r L 1 I f I I I i ~ i t r E 104~$.81~ ' 296.11' I I t-°- IRE I I i F1R I I l 4 i ~ , z 296.71'- x O
i ! ! i ,1SER i i i RISER i i ~ `,A ~ 'v ~ ~ ~ " ~ co -~4r32E ww 82-42'32'E w T Cc
/f~};,qq~,qqq , ~ + ~ ~ ' l 0 W C + o
~ rr ~ ~ ~ 1===`~'-` i ~ ~ ,II " s^ t A 7 , / / ~ I + , ~ ` + ~ ~ t CORNEA I I ( I ~ ,f f f I~ , N I%86.10 c~ 0 XIo ~ z q CORNER w
~n I I I I 1 ~O~ ~ ti n W i ~ \ N 19624.37 IN E 11195.95
0 LL
y 8 2 I ! I ~ ~ ~ b 0 ,
~ I i rd ~ ~ ; ii ~ ~ ;f ~ 2'11(2' u: i<.AtI , i + $ $ b Ij ~ ? ~ I 1 ~ C j I ii i~ 0 + + +
71 ~ ~ ~ it i - 1 [ ~ ( ~ i ~ ~ 1 ! ~ . L7 I + i ~ m i 4 ~ 4° I I ~ z
. G~' . , , .w .~j_4' a l I I I________.--" I ji l I {I L I /
I_-_-__ r ' IZ
N I I 1 ' , 9 ~ ~o I ~ I I f ~ + }
. . , d d' a d / t ~ ' • ~ ~ a ~ + i , ' / BOTTOM EL. 467.0 . , J_
+ ' - _.c_.__e_____________e. f~ H
I!~~I 1 I
l ~
:c t /'d , a
w m
I,. BOTTOM EL. 463.0 . , , + ^ ^

, , , r
. _ 55 + ~ °AS ~ ~ a , ~6A
d R q n r ~
'I ~ t ~1 ' . 35° 00'00"
+ • 0 1~ PLAN TRUE NORTH VA
~r3 ~8 3- I ~ ~.:j NORTH y o'z
• n„" ~ , r ' W ~o m ~m sN 0 o C
+ mLL r
I I', i t o rn~3~ T: 3 J! a[
i BOTTOM EL. 458.0 ` mat'~8 a C y 4 4
A ~ a . ;j j LINE TABLE y I ` ~ R 8 i ~ , LINE LENGTH BEARING t m •e w 'P / a D P C n 4
~ i L1e 99.97 5 05.3Tt4"E >r = C V ° s o
b ~ ~ ~ L19 100.04' S 03.0104'£ g - L20 Y)0.03' S 02.25'55"E
~~t ~n 727 1110.06' S 01'5103"E C p ~ m I 'ae S ~ o 'a y ~ L22 122.6}' S 02.04'12'rt V 00 2
~ Y~ 5 d I g : T____"'_ M 0 50 100 150 200 Q C,
o I;'i CORNER GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET C C
~ ~ ~ 4 u ~ i '°R ~ N 19016.64 °m a ~ E 9935.56
o'+ j 933.37' N 45.24'25"E I~ ! ; , 59.67 1 j c a
~ ~ ~ z ° ~ N 90 00'00'Y ~ ~ ~ f Q CORt~R N 16974.94 z
~ ~ ~ n = a E 9693.09 1 SHEET C
~,y,$y~]~~ r WS M_ 4_~ p~ 1 AREA 4 UTILITY PLAN KEY PLAN C8.14 y `o
r= d C8.14 SCALE t'=50' t
r~ ' 33m0 ~;^O 3 i
SiOC Copyright © 2004 by Carter & Burgess, Inc.

FACTORY WELD FLANGE, 12'X10' REDUCER AT
ALIGN FLANGE BOLT HOLES E%TERIOR FACI. OF BLDG. FIAE PULP HOUSE ONLY, T A i •
- T . _ _ _ _ - _ -~TEIFA$ - - _ _ _ _ . _ . _ . "-pE; "i7C1.07 _ _ FI . _.-.----PEAPENB{OUaR~&RFSER_.. RE. T/C7.03 - T[E ROD LEG BRACKET RISER, OR AS SHOWN ON FINISHED GRADE
THE UTILITY PLANS. ~ O 0 CAST IRON - y~ VALVE BOX E : c
_ I N N CENTERPOINi OF RISER FIRE PROTECTION RISER SIZES / VALVE .N•4< ..,p~4S r
(REFER i0 UTILITY PLAN CPN ~ o o FOR COORDINATESI I I 90 RISER LEG IE6ALUG THRUST BLOCKING RECUIREAENTS qNt' pIMPER
IEGALUG RETAINER LOCATION PIPE SIZE A(SFl• H(FTl rv ND2zLE N 3000 PSI CONCRETE
I COUP NGHOR TRACK MAINT. 6' q. TB 1.8 O O O O ~ MAREHWSE 8' 8,66 2.q FIRE PUFIP HOUSE 10' t3. S0 3.0 2' 2' 2' 2' 2.5 SF BEARING AREA
FACTORY WELDED FLANGE, -CONTINUATION BY IAYDISTURBI UNDISTURBED EARTH
PROVIDE W INSTALL BLIND I FIAE PROTECTION FLANGE KITH GASKET, i CONTRACTOR f- TRAFFIC LAff ~ DIMENSION 'A' IS THE REQUIRED BEARING AREA OF THE THRUST t- TRAFFIC LANE BOLTS AND NUiS• E%TERIOR FACE OF BLDG. BLOCKING BASED ON AN ALLOWABLE BEARING PRESSURE OF 2000
iL00R SLaB PO111E0 aR0UN0 SLEEYE. I PSF FOA 1N015TURBEO EARix. 4 GATE VALVE DETAIL
SLEEYE PROVIDE 8Y EIRE PROTECTIttI P~; USE THE FOLLOWING AREA MULTIPLIERS FOR OIFFEAING ALLOWABLE BEARING PAESSIWiES: 2 FIRE HYDRANT BOLLARD 4 CONTAACtOR AND INSTALLED BY FINISHED FLOOR BY FC - CONTAACTOA CONSTRUCTING TxE F100A ; I ;ELEVATION LAYOUT DETAIL NOT TO SCALE
COOA[DINATE SLEEVE DIAMETER KITH ALLOWABLE SOIL BEARING AREA INSTALLATION OVER FLANGE. PRESSURE MULTIPLIER NOT TO SCALE
1 iv BY SITE CONTRACTOR 1000 2.00 f I ~ 1500 1.33
2000 L00
_ 3000 0.67 CHAIN Fqt ROSE . g N022LE ITYPI ~ ~ 4+~.f~1°'7___ DIMENSION 'H' SHOULD BE ADJUSTED SUCH THAT x • IA/LSIfl fOR
CONCRETE THRUST BLOCK REQUIRED '-1' REVISED AREAS CALCULATED USING THE MUTIPLIEAS ABOVE. REFERENCE C0.01 UTILITY NOTES FOR HYDRANT TYPE 12000 PSF ALLOWABLE SOIL BEARING ' FOOTING -
PAESSWiE ASSUIEO, SEE TABLET ; AE: STRULTLRAL PLANS RE: 3/L8,31 FOR BOLLARD PLACETENT FOR EDDYING DEPTHS
12'X10' REDIICEA AT ' FIRE PIKP HOUSE ONLY,
~ OTHERWISE CONTINUE PIPE F[N. CAADE WITH SATE OIAI£TEA AS
IEGALUG RISER, OR AS SHOWN ON z THE UTILITY PLANS. I VALVE ~ - ~i• DRAIN HOLE SHALL BE ABOVE 6
x _ _ . CLEAR OF CONC. THRUST BLOCK - o z
N I 6' DIR. TYP. i c2ia III-II ~'°~~Tr••
KIPS) COUPLING IEGALUG RETAINER = ; i III • NI TH ANCHOR ' COUPING ooi ~I •••x•~•°•~ H/2 H/2 UNDISTURBED EARTH TIE ROD BRACKET ' ' ALL 19ECHANILAL JOINT RETAINER ClAN05 .a zmz
x STAINLESS STEEL AMES °1 t SHALL BE AMERICAN A-90857, qi mom>mY'o~
'IN~UILOING RISER' OR EQUAL APPHOYED EQUAL. DETAIL NOTES: 2''D' 6 CU. Fi. OF COARSE STOLE MIXED MIN. WITH COARSE SAND SHALL BE PLACED 'Mt: .
I. JOINTS SHALL NOi BE PLACED NAER fDOT INGS. AROUND FIRE HYDRANT BASE ANO DRAIN HOLE
THRUST BLOCK SHALL BE PpAEO AGAINST A M[N. AREA OF 12 50. Fi. Of UNDISTLFW3E0 Z O
SOIL 12000 P,S.F. MIN. BEARING PRESSURE) MAIN s' cn U
1 FIRE RISER DETAIL L ZZ
NOT TO SCALE N.J.-M.J. BEND 3 FIRE HYDRANT DETAI ~ - NOT TO SCALE PROPOSED gtADE ~ ~ Q a XZ
w ~ .~~iTJ+ FINISHED SIWiFACE a CRADLE SHALL E%iEN0 zi w w
TYPICAL COVER ~ a A M[N. OF 6' BEYINID 45° BENDS WITH VERTICAL O.D. OF PIPE I E rw
TIE-0DWN BLOCKING INOT SHOWN ~ _ 0" o 0
STORK DRAIN 24' MIN. CONCRETE 3000 P51 COIPACTEO SOIL 12' P[ LINE CLEAR PER SPECIFICATIONS n ~ NiN. _ a 12' PIPE 00 12. CD Z MIN. MIN. w
~m THRUST BLOCKING ~ a ~ U= 0
MATER LINE - 1 LL
VARIES KEEP A MIN. OF i' VARIES i~ ~ ~ CLEARANCE BETWEEN ~ ~ rc SELECT BACKFILL APPROVED TRENCH EXCAVATION
VARIES 5' MIN. 5' W[N. VARIES CONC. AND JOINTS, ITYPI ~ COMPACTED TO 987 (ASTM 01557) IN MAX 8' LAYERS
CRADLE TO EXTEND THE FUL j \ c w L45° BEND WITH CONCRETE JOINT LENGTH OF PIPE ITYPI I a ~ z
CRADLE INOT SHOWNI ! I , _ ~
LINE CRADLE DETAIL ~ ~ ~ W o 6 WATER m o - NOT TO SCALE ~ , ! m J CV
,QQ Q BEDDING MATERIAL LL OCJ O O \ COMPACTED TO 98%
5 TYPICAL SECTION OF WATER ~ PIPESUBGAAOE; VV - B ~ $TA81lIZailOx oQ 4 Q (ASTM 015571 w Q ^Q C.JC_10O°p IN 6' LAYERS D T
LINE LOWERING AT STORM MATERIAL [FAEOUiREO 0 BENDS 90° 15° 22~t° Illh° C8.31 i 0 O O\ 1J O 0
DRAIN LINE CROSSING Ya•REO'o. L.F. Is 3T IB 9 P~ ~ NOT TO SCALE TRENCH ZONES ~ \ V/l/\//l\\/\\\ \/\/R\/\ w
A Fi. 2.8 2.4 1.6 1.2 BEARING 6 B FT. q.00 3.88 3.36 2. T5 DETAIL NOTES: J PIPE SUBGRADE; = STABILIZATION ON C/)
AREA C FT. 1.00 3.88 3.36 2.75 p A BEARING I. ALL CONSTRUCTION, INSPECTION ANO MONITORING SHALL COIPLY WITH ALL MATERIAL IF REQUIRED
AREA i DSNA, STATE ANO LOCAL ORDINANCES, LAMS AID PROCEONES, THIS SHALL 40L.RE0'0. C.F. 8I 65 33 16 INCLUDE ALL CONSTRUCTION METHODS, MATERIALS AID SAFETY PROCEOU~S. BEARING BEARING ADDITIONAL TRENCH SAFETY, INSPECTION AND MONITORING SHALL BE DESIGNED
AREA a AREA _ d A FT. 3.2 2.8 2,4 1.6 AND FUWIISHED BY THE CONTRACTOR AS REW1REp BY OSHA, STATE AND LOCAL a a • ~ e 8 B F1. 5.00 1.80 3,66 3.20 ORDINANCES, LAK AID PRDCEDUAES.
w C FT. 5.00 1.80 3.66 3.20 a
7 ATER & SANITARY SEWER 8 BEDDIP SECTION VOL. REO'D. C.F. 246 19T 99 49 W S BEDDING ZONE :8.31 NOT TO SCALE
A FT. 6.4 s.6 3.2 2.B - TRENCHING DETAIL ce.31 Nor To scA ~ 12 B FT. 6.20 6.00 5.54 1.20
L Ft. 6.28 6.DO 5.54 I.zo NOT TO SCALE xorc To oLSIUMp, val«E eASEO a rnesswc a :so ast
TEE / DEADEND BEND GROUT OVER E%POSED VARIES • SEE N VARIES - SEE AREA UTILITY PLANS TOP OF STRAINER J.R. SMITH MODEL 2120 OR c m
STEEL STRAPS 3-~/ BAR STEEL STRAPS 24.5' BEARING AREA OF BLOCK IN SQUARE FEET TRUCTDN JONT "T" APPROVED EOUAL ELEV.•-0.63 0
PIPE TEE III//° 221/2° 45° 90° REFER TO 7/C1.01 ~ &ILOWIG FACE I SIZE DEADENDS BEND BEND BEND BEND 12'CURB 4 2.0X CONCRETE SUMP PAD O1" o c W~ m
0o cR~w
4' 1.5 0.5 t.0 1.5 2.5 I 6' 4.5 113'7 1.0 1.5 2.5 6.0 116'1 I - - I •0.0 B' 7.0 116'1 1.5 2.5 5.0 9.0 118'1 I L c
ID' 10.0 119'1 2.0 4.0 7.5 14.0 123') I _ E%PANSON JgNT I2' 14.5 123' 1 3.0 5.5 I I.0 20.0 ! 27' 1 I ~ REf ER TO 4/C7.01 q"CLEANWT-%
I FORM A$ NECESSARY ~ b _ I 2 IN. 4"CLEAIOUT-~ 5 E m c'2 ` ~.A 1 IN- ea e8 c m 0 1: 2 n
KI = I 1 I$ DIMENSION 'A' SHOWN IN DIAGRAM I I an ~ ; 3 ' - N ~ ~ E I I~ I 3000 • CONCRETE N ~ I cF 0. 1:2 ~ V ~
E ~Y 12 ~ ALLOWABLE SOIL BEARING PRESSURE AREA MULTIPLIER m ~ BARS 80TH C8.32 3.5' o FL. ELEV. 715.06 a
1000 2.00 ~ WAYS 6' C-C 1500 1.33 ~ ~ ~ d~ - `rN M 2000 1.00 ~ A~ 50 y,pX H 1 4"SEWER LINE V V V45*SEND LENGTH VARIES
~ ~ 3000 0.6T i I TOP OF STRMER t m ~ i2'CURB .4 ELEV. ••0.63
a Y : I. ALL BLOCKS MUST BEAR AGAINST UNDISTURBED EARTH, ~:r~ X ~ x ~ RE:S/C7.02 I ~ 5~ 2. ALL FITTINGS SHOWN IN PLAN, x c SANITARY SEWER LIPS
3. CONCRETE COIFRESSIVE STRENGTH SHALL BE NINIHIH ~ 'G 3000 P51 AT 28 OATS. F g ~ n KEEP CONCRETE CLEAR I SEE SEWER PROFILES FOR FL ELEV.
7t ~ o q, PLACE DOUBLE LAYER OF TAR PAPER BETWEEN CONCRETE q' d` OF JOINTS AND BOLTS Ir ~ 3 BLOCK [NG AND PLUG TO PERMIT EASY REMOVAL FOR FUTURE I) ~ z m EXTENSION OF WATER NA[N. '
`o .m, do
1 o WATER LINE VERTICAL ~ 1 COMPACTOR SUMP DETAIL ~ 2 COMPACTOF ;OMPACTOR SUMP DRAIN DETAIL
~oF TIE-DOWN BLOCK C3.12 NOT TO SCALE CB.JI NOT TO SCALE ~ ~ 0 9 WATER LINE THRUST BLOCK DETAILS IT TO SCALE SHEET
i~g6q"{ - NOT TO SCALE NOT TO SCALE MO i- 'R
°u W NOTE: USE ALLOWABLE BEARING PRESSURE C8.31
OF 2,000 PSF FOR UNDISTURBED EARTH SDiOo 3=n
s4~& Copyright © 2004 by Carter & Burgess, Inc.

- - -T}IREAOED INSERT - - _ . _ J~
3 TIES C8.72 /_L_-•' POLE, BOLT COYER AIR) /
I ~ R ~ ~ BASE PLATE PROVIDED BY / ~ I i ~ I' MNCM, INSTALLED BY EC 1' 6
I I TEMPORARY CAP \ C8.32 I ,I I, YERTlCAL REINFORCING BARS
~4 I 1/4' CHAMFER ALL AROUND \ \ / N AEltff'.BAAS I,1 1 1 INSTALLATION [N CONCRETE REWIRES ;I• LONG IiYP.
\ ~i ~ Q CONTINUOUS V2' E%PAN$ION JOINT ~ 4 QUADRANTS)
I' I 'I CB.32 MATERIAL ALL AROUiD. SEAL MITH JOINT SEALER PER SPECIFICATIONS. Y.M. FABRIC 0.12 ~ 11 ' 8-+6x12'-6' LONG SO.IN. MIN.
r;1 BARS EWALLT SPACED 2 SECT ION I~ I I 'I N GROUND CdBLE. INSTALL IN I' C8.32 NOT TO SCALE DETAIL NOTES
2 F t-,1 CONDUIT THRU BASE i. CUT OUT A MIRES IN THE AREA OF THE REDUCEO MALI . (/1 ANCHpt BCiTS IUq' DIR. SECTION. ALSD iNCIUDE Tiff VERTICAL M1AE FOR REMOVAL.
CB.32 ~ X 42' LONG % 6' X00X MITH 2. CONCRETE COIPAESSIVE STIffNGTN - 4000 P51 MIN. DESIGN. I II I ; 2 NUTS, MASHERS, AND I LOCH PDLE ANCHOR BOLT PATTERN 3. CONCRETE AIR ENTRAINMENT TO BE 6X MINIMUM.
L L_1 S = MASHER EACH PER NANtFACTIgiER'S 4. LID RING LOAD TRANSFER I$ TO BE DISTRIBUTED BY USE OF A I I i o = FINISHED SUiFACE RECOM!END0.TION. PREFORMED MASTIC JOIN1 MATERIAL.
L ~ I N N COORDINATE VITH EC. S~ FORMBOX.~ CRUSHED STOMff I$ TD BE PROVIDED AS FOUNDATION
'III IL~I I / A I - gS~Typ, 6. ALTERNATIVE PRECAST BD%ES MEETING SPECIFICATION A~ -III - - ACCEPTABLE. 1 i. USE BELL END FITTINGS DN CONDU[15 PENffiRATING PUII BpXES.
- d z I - i EXOTHERMIC MELD
m= II _r' 5 PRECAST PULL BOX ~ - -1 $A' % 10' COPPER CLAD
iYP !r -.I TYP GROUND A00 CONCRETE BASE - NOT TO SCALE L COt~DU[T AS REOU[REQ I g
I_ _ _ I 13-~3 % 24' DIR. TIES LICIT FIXTURE ORIENTATION I/q• DIR. INSERT • ~ I I MITH I'-6' LAP ITYP.1 (RE~ UTILITY PLAN FOR
I_ _ _ I Ai 12' O.C. ORIENTAiIONI NEENAH LIO 6 FRAIE H NTAL BAR$ R-1792-HL
SHALLCBE FNEIOWTIED. YELOING 3 SECT ION
2' 6' NOT PERMITTED. SUPPORT REINFORCEMENT IN ITS PROPER C8.32 NOT TO SCALE FINISHED GRADE 44' DIR. LOCATION FROM THE FOAMMORK
DURING CONCRETE OPERATION.
DETAIL NOTES M ~ I 32' I I. 4000 PSI MIN. ZB DAY CONWAESSIVE STRENGTH CONCRETE MITH GRADE 60 REINF. STEEL. , I em m' a~
2. If MATER I$ PRESENT IN HOLE, REMOVE BEFINiE PWRING CONCRETE. ~ ' POLE, BOLT COYER AND 3. FOUNDATION E%CAYATION SHALL BE BY 30' AUGER IN UNDISTURBED OA PROPERLY COIPACTEO BASE PLATE PROVIDED BY ~ '
FILL PER SPECIfICATI0N5. , MMCM, INSTALLED BY EC 4. FOUNDATION SHALL HAVE A MINIMUM ALLOWABLE END BEARING OF 2000 PSF. + •a.''~ w'jc~~ •ie
5. FWND0.TION Has REEN DESIGNED FOR A COHESivE SOIL BASED ON A MINIMUM COHESIVE ~ NUT i _ _ J.. VALUE OF 1000 PSF. ` LOCK 41/1' BOLT PROJECTION 6. FOUIMIATION HAS BEEN DESIGNED FOR A CRANIAAA SOIL BASED ON A NINIMIN LATERAL SOIL MASHER
PRESSURE OF 1000 PSF. UTILIZING AASHTD FIGURE 1.6.X141, OF 'EN9EDNENT OF POSTS _ m PITH OVERTURNING LOADS'. MASNER_`. I' '10' Z
T. E%POSED CONCRETE AIU GROUT SHALL BE PAINTED TRAFFIC YELLOM. TERNINAIE ALL I' B' LEVELING NUi CONDUIT YI1H 10' PROVIDE 10' HIDE BELL END fITTINGS CONCRETE FOIR0AT10N co U
ANCHOR BOLT fOR BOX. 8' CRUSHED STONE ZZ Q
a X Z
1 TYPICAL LIGHTING 4 DETAIL 6 SECTION wo
- POLE BASE DETAIL CB.32 NOT TO SCALE ce.32 NOT TO SCALE
NOT TO SCALE ow
3 cz w
Ur
w
CO
J Cl1
aw F- o
w N
w J W
F- u.)
E E u c g 'z
W s e W~ s s~~
0o m
NS h z c Wo3m
mmm ALL`
3
ce S c
b Sb
3 yy~ V 00
p N Y> W
f a~ $ i

~ 4; o
d =m $ o~ ~

s~ ~ a SHEET
w M~ X C8.32
h4 U 2 n Tj 6
A ~3'p0 ;tea
i5orc Copyr*,ght © 2004 by Carter & Burgess, Inc.

i
#60 1
3F P `OY, "c y ~ 5~ WQ ePSON 1 8 1 R f 9 1519 SR ib38 aO A jJff
O = a I C JpNO 2 L ~ v 9 lm 2 51~ Oyu ' cr ePtOP 9 h ° t 9~ ~ N m
0 ~ p ~ F m 1, ! = SZO~ ° P P gTBj ~ 0
A a^ f sl 'Pry 44oL <VS CAS h
z e2 AvAas a 1 OAVI ~ IS 39 6 0 m o w Q z ~
I • ~ 9N LE U p 29 y i FOX UN { PLE U k ° ~ SSA 1699
SAM M. WALTON DEV ~ ~ ~ o RF ' ELOPMENT COMPLEX < A SSR 1672 S A RF G °
2001 S.E. TENTH STREET, DEPT. 9562 P1 W H.° RY D ° R , SOL > ~fq IIC qy SOUTH P `Y4 N S G R IN =
9 N = BENTONVILLE, ARKANSAS 72716-0550 ~ ICTORV @ PQ'y a N4- 1
' ° R 1115 a L 96R 1145
SS9 14 9 SSR N3 II ~'S5P 10 TAN 3 SBR M9 _ 1 u 0
~ /X F R 248 F 1 d j/ R ~ 85P 1686
151 Consultants in Planning, Engineering, Architecture, DISTRIBUTION 1s ssa~ A TION 8gq
Construction Management, and Related Services CENTER R /63g S SSR 180 SSR 1640
CARTER & BURGESS INC. r AiR,M1 LOCATION J N 39
/ CAT: 36°17 28.T N Retail & Distribution -Floor 29 LDNC: T8°23' 6.5•w 8.7°N i.5"W7j48 e
717 Main Street, Forf Worth, Texas 76102
817 222-8500 Fax [phone] ( } ( I DISCIPLINE CODE BUILDING AREAS SITE AREAS
C & B ARCHITECTS ENGINEERS P.C. ` T°~~'Y , I S - SpTA~l11C1~IRAL~ 3. ~CIISETENINCE GARAGE 2. LAYOUT / 3. GAIDINC N - MECNNICAI 1. FIRE PU.IP NOOSE A. p1A[NAGE P - PL1161NG 5. EROSION CONTROL w e^ 39
Retai & Distribution -Floor 29 E -ELECTRICAL 6. PAVING 777 Maln Street Fort Worth Texas 76102 A -AEFRIGERATIp 7. SITE IIPAOVEIENTS ~ V V FP -FIRE PROTECTION 8. UTILITY ~
(817 222-8500 Fax [phone] ~ = Aa~"DFIEaui%ENT'UETAL Ali°o~cJ s. LArmscAPINC 1ne ,
( ~ MS - STAUCTLXAL (IEfAL BU0.DINC1 J -BAR JOIST t1ETAL BUILDINGI VICINf 6 - ARCHITECiL1iAL ICOXCAETEI
Li - ARCHITECTURAL ILOY TEIP.1 NOi 1 VICINITY MAP NOT TO SCALE
SITE PACKAGE ? BUILDING PACKAGE ? MECHANICAL PACKAGE ? E TR ? LEC ICAL PACKAGE FIRE PROTECTION PACKAGE ? CONCRETE FLOOR PACKAGE ? METAL BU.
C0.01 517E IBBAEVIATIp15, $YMB0.5 6 GFIERAL LADIES A0, 01 ARCHIfECTUGL ANiEYlAllpS, STM80.5 i Cf1EAAL X01ES R.01 IEpANICAL ABBRVIAifd1S, STMd7LS t fEIEAAA NOIFS E1.01 ELECTRICAL 1BBAEYIATIp6 SYIB0.S L IEIFRIL NOTES FP0.11 flR NDIECTip AIMEYIATIONS, SIIE0.5 i QIQAL Ig1F5 60.01 STALCTIRIAL ABBPEYIAi[d15, SnA9pL5, t 6RRAL XOiFS IMO. DI AACXIIECIURAL ABBREI M0.11 IECHAXICAL SCIEOLLE$ EI.O! LIp11NG FIKDAE SCEDULE, fYl AIO LOUY9 [01iR1 FPI.I! SITE RMI - EIR NMECTIp 60.02 TYPICY CCMpEIE FIOp OEfAIlS METAL BUILDING PACKAGE MA0.01 ARCHITECTURAL ABBREVIATIONS, SYMMS i GENERAL NOTES
1. TOPOGRAPHY 50.01 SIAUCRRAL ABNiEYIATIpS, SYI&L$ i [fRRA IETES SCNfARE 1 DOOR DOER SCIEDLIE FPI, 07 FACILITY -FIR ALYII IKdOYTIp CI.01 OVERALL - 10PIXAAPXIC MAP - S0. D2 rYPICY FOUgAi[p DETAILS 1 FDp1ING SCNEOILE E0.11 SITE PLN -fIfCIA1CAl Ko: of COL WI RARIND~VEYI MS0. 01 STRUCTURAL ABBREVIATIONS, SYMBOLS t GENE RAL NOTES 160102 COLUMN BEARING ELEVATIONS i CLEAR HEIGHTS
sD.D3 re¢u fwNDAnp pruLS 1, WAREHOUSE CI.II OVERALL - EKISTING fO1g1iIQ6 5 OENDLITIp RAM CL12 ENLARGED OEMOIIiIp RAN i. WAREHOUSE N1.01 AREA A Yrnl - Rld RN I . YAREHDUSE I. WAREHOUSE
ML02 ARA A IBOITDII -INCI RM I. MAREHOUSE 1. WAREHOUSE AI.00 pM0.lflp RAN MI.II AREA A Irpl - YEIIIRITI4 RIM AI.01 AREA A lipl • AACR RAN MI.12 AREA A IBDiT011 - YDUILAiIp RAN FI.11 TAG A ItVI - MR PLY WI.01 AAEI A Ilpl • YC7 ILr 61.11 A~ 1 Il?I - fpTiElE FIOp TIN MII.01 RlLLlilp RN 1. WAREHOUSE wI.09 DINDLITIOM PLAN
2. LAYOUT AI.01 AREA A (BOiipl - RA6 ftN NI.21 AREA A (fpl - IFAI[XO RAN EI.@ YEA A IBDTipI - AAU RN RI.I2 MIA A IINRIE - NIQ RAE 61.11 A[A A IpF1AI • CONCRETE Rpl TUN INT. DI ARA A lipl - RAO AI.10 OVERALL YAAENOIISE PLAN MI.22 AREA A (AOTT011 - RATING RN FI.II NNEXME - tIBIT1MC O1IEXSId6 RAI RI.II 17,B - IERrr F~ 1RIEplp 0.N 61.N YIRIOINE SLR/ RAI WI. D1 YEA A lBDfTpI - R C2.01 OVERALL - LAYOUT t DIMENS(p RAX AI.I I AREA A lipl - LLOOA RAN MI.JI AREA 200A, i 51p - MYAC RAN$ EI.I I ARA A ITOPI -LIGHTING RAN NI.11 ~ 7,~1 -11FRAt F~ IRRCf Ip RAI 61.7! COII]EIE ROp RIAllS MI, II OYEAILL IAYfNpISE % NA I.01 AREA A ITOP) - RACK RAN MA 1.02 AREA A (BOTTOM' - RACK PLAN MA1.1M OVERALL WAREHOUSE PLAN
AI.12 ARA A 180Trp) -flop RAY MI.11 XVAC piAIL$ EI. 12 AREA A (BOlipl - LIpi1NG RAN RI.12 ~ T I.II - OYE~fl/ FIR RDIECTIp PIN N11.11 AIFA A ITOPI - FLD C2.11 AREA I - LAYg1T 1 DIRNSIp RAN AI.I/ MAAEHpSE DETAILS MI.12 XCATING STSIEM DETAILS E1.21 ARA A I1f1P1 - POKA RAN FPI.I7 NNE 1,11, I! • OA4NEAD FIR Rp1CtTlp PLAN INI.12 ARA A t80ripl - % EI.22 ARA A INilpl - PWEA RAM C1.11 AREA 2 - LAYWT i DIMENSIp RAN Ai.lS YAREHEISE DETAILS NI.U MVAC OEIAILS FPI.JO AREA 21p 1 SMA - DIARIRD ROp RY6 NAI.21 EK1ERIp ELEVATIp15 M41.11 AREA A (TOP) - FLOOR PLAN MAI.12 AREA A (BOTTOM) - FLOOR PLAN MAI.21 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS
C2.17 AREA 3 - UYpI { DINEXSIp ftAN AI,11 EK1ERIp ELEVATIpS EI.25 YAREHOISE, IR, fPX L DkW01p6E - COOUR Rah FPI,JI ARA A TE~I IIAR MAI.22 EK1ERIp ELEVAiIp C2.1/ ARA A - LAYpi i DINfxS[p ftN AI.I2 ENTERIp ELEVAilpS i Lp1VEA iYRS EI.31 AREA A ITOPI - VENI1UTIp / NUIOX PpEA RAN iP1.10 AREA 4 - SEC/I~ TAE IAORCINII M11.71 MILL SECTIONS AI.11 pLL SEC110115 ~ E1.31 ARA A IBOrlpl - AFRIfUTIp / 1EAfIMG PDADI PLMI iP1.50 f111E PAOiECilp LECEA05 L RfA1L5 MAT, 32 YALL SEC110AS i OEi~ MA1.22 EXTERIOR ELEVATION i LOUVER TYPES "11.31 WALL SECTIONS "11.32 WALL SECTIONS i DETAILS
AI.7! HALL SECi1dK 1 DETAILS PI.I I ARA / lipl - RUIBING RAY EI./1 AAU 101, SM 1 Sle - LIpTDIG RM6 IPI.SI FIR PAO1ECflp XAMD:A RTAILS INI.37 Mp USED 3. GRADING AI.I7 MALI SFCi1dK 6 DE1AlL5 PI.12 YEA A IBOfipl - RIAB[NG RAX EI.11 ARA 2NA, 211, fIM I /N -lIGROi FLER C3.01 O'ERALL - pA01XG RAM AI.31 PALL SfC11g15 L pTAlLS PI.21 R7UM 20W, 500A - RUIEING BANS 6 DETAILS EI.51 YEA IM, SN i 511- Pqq RAE fPI.fiO YEA A - FARINEMIfE BRACING fp SEISMIC ZORS M11. SB PALL SECTIONS M11.11 YYEXOUSE YYL FAN NAI1.37 NOT USED '"1.38 WALL SECTIONS MAI.41 WAREHOUSE WALL FRAMING
AI.JB HALL SECTIgK P1.31 RISER blApNb - ftUE1NG E1.52 YEA lIM, R11RI ARA' PpQ iLMti WI.42 FIRE AISEA DETAllS ALAI YAAEHOIISE YALI TAKING EI. TI EIECIIItR RIARS CI.II ARA I • GRADING RAN AI.I2 EIR RISER OE7AfL5 EI.1! ELECIAICAL OEUILS. ML 1.51 OOp SCREAES 1 DD C7.12 AREA 2 - GRADING RAN AI.SI DDp SCIEOI.LES L D001 TYPES EI.71 ELECIAICAL DETAILS Wi.fit Y~IOD30TUTPES ROOt I M41.42 FIRE RISER OETA I15 MA1.51 DOOR SCIEO M 0 DOOR TYPES MA 1.52 WINDOW TYPES, DOOR i WIMOOI DETAILS
C7.13 AREA 7 - GRADING RIM AI.52 NIIOOY TYPES ODOR i YINOOY DETAILS EI./1 OIEC`R~ IYAAMLS AREA A C3.11 YEA A - CAAOIND RYI AI.53 DOOR, YIIOOY t N15CELLARp15 p1A1L5 EI.91 PAIEI.IBDAAO SOEOIILES MAU2 AREA 301 - FLOOR PLANS
AI.51 NILLNpN ELEYATId15 L DETAILS f1.92 PAIEI.BNAO SOEOIILES RI.II YEA A ITpS - AON 4. DRA INAGS AI.fi2 ARA 200A, JOOA, 100 i 500A -FLOOR ftAN$ NF 1.12 YEA A IBOiTpI - N AI.65 ARA IDD 200A, 2008, ]OBA, SODA 4 SODA - FERRIED fLOp RMK ME I.tI P/LIET RAR -RAN I CI,01 EKISTIXG ORAINACf ARA MAP AI.71 ACOM fIN}SN SCNFDIAE RI.22 PALLET RAC[ - RN I ME I. 11 AREA A (TOP) - ROOF PLAN IE1.12 AREA A (BOTTOM) - ROOF PLAN IE1.21 PALLET RACK - PLAN i DETAILS
C1,02 pYELpEO ORAIXA[f AREA MAP AL73 AREA 11DA, JOOA, 100, 500A L COIITR0. ROOM - RFLECTEO CEILING RAMS U.11 NYOAALL IC CAl[LLAi[OIIS 11.91 IXIEAIp ELEVAilp1S JLII YEA A IiOPI - BAA , W1.22 PALLET RAO( - PLAN i BE TA LS
JI.12 IAEA A IBpilpl - BI CI.lI OYERALI - STOPoI pUIX ftAN 51.11 YEA A c10P1 - FOLIgAIIp RAN JI.21 BAR JOIST PMEL P011 JI.11 AREA A (TOP) - BAR JOIST PLAN J 1. 12 AREA A (BOTTO) - BAR JOIST PLAN J1.21 BAR JOIST PANEL POINT LAYOUTS
51.12 YEA A f80iip1- fplDAilp RAN U.71 AREA I - SIpM DAAIX RAN 51.15 YAREHNISE SLAB RAN G.72 YEA 1 - $ipN PAIN RAN 51.31 PILASTER DETAILS
U.33 YEA 3 - $ipM GRAIN ftN Ilpi IXCLUOEDI 51.32 FDIIUAf Ip DEfA1L5 04.31 AREA A - S1pM PAIN RN 51.33 fpROAilp DETAILS 51.35 ANCNp BOLT OEIAILS ,
G.11 $Tdd GRAIN PA61lES - L IRS A-20, A-30, A-/D 51.41 PYLEI AACA - ftAX i pLILS A-50, A-fil 51.12 PYLEi AA[A - RAX i piAILS
C/.SI STgiM PAIN DETAILS - SHEET 16 3 G.52 SiORN PAIN OElAlLS - SXEEi 2 6 7
C/.53 SipM PAIN OE7All5 - SNEEI 3 6 7 5. EROSION CONTROL
C5.01 FROSIp { SEOIIEXIATIp CpiROI PLAN
C5.11 EAOSIp 1 SEOIRNi/flp CpTAOL OETAlLS 6. PAVING
ffi.ll OVERALL -PAVING RAN Cfi.01 OVERALL - kfEAMA7E PAYING RAX
T, SITE IMPROVEMENTS C7.D1 SIfE IIPROVEAEXT DETAILS - 9EEi 16 3
C7, 02 SITE IIPAOYE1EYli DETAILS - SIIEEi 16 3 Ci, 07 SIZE INPROYEIENi OEIAILS - SNEEI 7 6 7
8. UTILITY
ce.D1 oYERUL - unurr RAN
C8.1I ARA 1 -UTILITY RAN CB. I2 ARA 2 • UTILITY Rut C1.13 AAF4 7 - UIILIiY RAN (N01 INQIEED)
CO. N ARA 1 - UIIIITY RAN C8.21 S/NITAAY SEM:A PROFILES -CUES
C8.31 UTilirY OE1AlL5 - LIFEi 16 2
08.32 UiILIrY DETAILS - LIfE1 2 6 2
x N C
8 a eNM ,
i ` T :ox !04`/'11":
a: ~ 9;sz B#i ~ i~
'~,4' ~ ;N g'~• py',d
8~ -
0 ~ n~C
v~l~ °puM iy0 UV
qr ~z ~ A:i 3UE FOR PERMIT
i om00? r ~-66? ~ /1 ~S°aa m ] MAY 10, 2004
Copyr;ght © 2004 by Carter & Burgess,lnc.

r I _ _ r
ORNEA
[ NE 21544.44 + ~ N 147 E 9184.41
91 .41 [ CORNEA N i ~.1e ';l•S i
CORNER E N 21454.78
~ E 9094.4 Cf4NER 0 N 21124.27
[ CORNER E %10.28 N 21472.43 Sy do ~ CORNEA E 9112.41 N 21413.42 [CORNEA
[ CORNER ° E %28.58 N 21764.40 N 21442. T1 ~ ? N 2CO~R7T ~ E 10713.57
E 9106.36 ~ ~ E %69.65 s. T\
~ Q CORNER [ CORNER N 21274.89 ~ N 21348.05 ` E 10771.51 MER !74.89 r71.52
~ E 9460.20
S :7 ~ ~ \ re CORNER N 21192.90
ti4' 369 [ C[MiNEA ~t1 E 10828.89 1 b 9~ N 21168.67 ,4, by~oyh E E 9955.70 oy ,~o E 10828.89
ipb ~ ` pyti a~ ~Y ~ R a G ARDHOUSE y~ x il°RiiaD e CORNER N 21111.20
' 7 a e E 10886.72 „ ~ p r^ ~ ~ [ C0~lER ~ e E 10886.72
, .F~.t3 { ~ 326.6y. N 21014.97 F i~r ~ ~ , . vL E 10459.47 [CORNEA e CORNER N 21028.17 c
\ [CORNEA ~ I:. SALE E E?0942. . N 2097 .61 ~ ~ • ; E 10942.53 a
' R CORNER
° - m ' N 20941.94 t E 10993.26
~ 20681 51 - ~ _L_ _ E 8491.35 - - - -
~ ~ \ i, 1 e CORNER N 20851.40 _ :e E 11035.78 $
y E, 8585µi5 11 11 " + y, ~
9 I 1 ~ , ' N 20875.77 ,l I h 1 ~a .t Q CORNER N 20758.08
~ ~ E e54a_1T----•------------ - TRAILER PARKING E 11072.01 sQ a E e Z W m i T Z
- . , t ~ .11 , +I I~, g 2 w C 1117 (t CORNER °w i o 0 0
- _ I Y 1 4 N 20662.62 i; E 11101.88
. - F t Z
E~ :y-( ~ °yy I i [ 1 i -i - i i I I I I ~ a CORNER 0 N 20565.84
a i .i i . i. .i . .i i . i. .1 I ~ a~ s ° - E 11127.25 (n i Z Z 1
_ ; I ~ I 7 i I I I I I I I I I I i ~ ~ TRAILER PARKING ._.~._~_._.-_-i.__i ._,_.~._.i ___i_._i_. i._.i ._i_. r,
i i i i i i i i i i i i f e CORNER N 20467.68 Q n E 11146.56 W O
s e ~ , _ I I I 1 I I I- I 1- Z_ i~ „ ~ DRY GOODS "
r q ~ II I ~ I 1 i 1 ~ i~ ~ i~ I-~ i N is iI - I CORNER to; W N 20368.63 ~
~ ¢ ~ CORNER ~ ~ ' ~ N 2D33+. TRACTOR 3 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Q a E 791J 4 ' ~ - - - - - - - ~ - - - - ~ ~ is I E 11160.78 CD z
. ~ ~ ~ ~ TMG PARKING ~FI~EL! ISI..AND i . 1..1 . .i i .I • I- ~`b ~ ~77 _I 1_ I_I I I_I I f 1 I I ~ x W
# r I R CORNER U N 20269.10 ! I s E 11170.40 LL
> s ~ FE~ELi STiOR~G n _..Ycsxs~iccu ~ ( I I 1 ( I I ' ~ , _ , i r! u ro Jss _ .r ._.1_._1_.7._._._1_. i._.i ._.1_._L_. i._.i ._t_. Q ~ f;
d ~ Ss • r ' 3 a,, o• ~ i i i i i i i i i i i i i ~ ~ ,.R , L?r (CORNER
~ S4` rte' ' u I I I I I I I I I I i I ` , ~ r ~ I I I I I I I I I I I I ! ~ i~ N 20169.21 E 11175.84
RR5 i' HEADY LINE 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 I = a~~_ EJ I
3 ~ [ CORNER + I READY LINE i i i i i i i i i i 1 1 i^' i' f ~ ' ~ ~ , 0 N 20127.35 , q CORNER r N 20069.27 O Q
S ~ E 8215.02 ~ ' I 1, I -i-` - .-i-. ~ ; 11 , N Ir ~)I(' s~~I~ I ~h• f I I I f I I 1 I E 11180.09 J F i I Q
,a . FvREA 00 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 , I i , ; J Q CORNER O
, ! I I f t l l l i,,; ~ , ' _ t. ' N 19%9.2T i E I1183.49
~ i i i i i i i i i i i i i i ~p m J W
C7 ° s• Z i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i ° - ,,r a CORNER I
_ _ - - S N 19846.72 E 11187.92
°e R ' (Y I I I I I I I 1 I ~ ~ i I I I I I I I e m a m m :__.~N.k98AB.~2::-~'"-fl;. I I I I 1 u°°" ~ r, 306.14' 306.74' O
~ ~ ~ ~ R~FRdGE~A,T1~~~ I I I I I 1 I „ , ° ~r ~ 1 , - - - - - - - - - 1 it r-' ~4'IOC~ i d~ ~ l 'I 1 1 1 f 1 .~j~' .1 .7- .T. .7.7. .7 m m m m i u , ~-54 10'W S 82- e CORNER
W ~ r ~71TTi7T/~ N 19724,36 E 11192.34
I I i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i e 5 6 6 J _ ~ I I ° e ° ° ° ~ i;.~~ iii , ~ Y ~ ~ I _ I 1 I ~ ~ ~`--T~-- ~ ~-~T-7•-~T--- ~ ~ 296.11_ 296.7 1 i
Q ~NE'RGY~ CIENTE~ , 1 ' 3 ( A ~ 5 ~ I I I I I I I 11 I I J f- I- 1 1 I s m m a a ~ ~ 01 ' N 82°42'31 N 82°42'32'E 3
I I ` " R CORNER ~ ~ ~ I I i N I%86.10 I i R CORNER N 1%86. TO
Z - • n ~i i ~ r . E 10898.02 N y ,i i t a E 10898.02
N W I I N C 6244.37 E 11195.95
3 ~ ; - iii r----..-- , ,TE y c
~a i i ..PARKING ~ ~ s i e 9 to _s .0
w~ »i~ TRAILER PARKING ~ ' ` ' ~ O1y O W ~ { r Y ~ ~ n
I' I ~ 1 ~ I~~il _ ~ ~ j f~v5 .w f t; I I E 4 , ~5 5 5 , _ 3 y C ~ gN F . ~ {IS ~ o~ w,~ iti 2
- , 1 - ~ -------•------...----___.j.~----- ~ ~ S - - - _ . ~ " 1 c ].Yz s co 0 m a L
_ ~
~ i - I ~ ~ - ~ . L •c oaaa8 0 35° 00'00" °Is~ y
PLAN TRUE NORTH NORTH
N 19235. & 1 ~ ` + ~ ~ E 8580.00 , ( . ~ i a
V u°u i m cr.
e ~ , , • . - M, a,
r , S ' , °j55 R . ; 5 h c
R R o . ? 3T. ' ~ ~ ~ ~ = PARKING COUNT N. a
as ° EXISTING NEW T T Z TOTAL a
~ ~ ` ~ CORNER A650CIATE 311 236 547 3 x_ ~ • 933.33' _ ~ N 19016.84 HANDICAPPED 12 - 12 547 12 z
~jO ~_N ~ N 90°00' 00'N E 9935.58 DOCK DOORS 82 56 138 x y [CORNER [ GORIER e ~ N 18974,94 N 18974.94 i 138 SHEET C
~ ~ ~ TRAILER 169 252 421 i_ i_ R ~ ~ E 8959.16 E %93.09 u° READY LINE 70 -6 64 421 ti 64 0 100 200 300 400
a I OVERALL -LAYOUT & DIMENSION PLAN TRACTOR 5T 50 107 107 C2.01 GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET J
saes c2.D1 scaLE: t• =too' s-a a 3 i
~95a Copyright © 2004 by Carter & Burgess,Inc.

% BENCH MARKS: - -
_ ..._______I _ - ` R 1...l IL_-_ _ N 21102.21 :moo` 6,J E 9622.15
e C NER; 21544' A i N 1472;43 E 9184.4 F ELEVATION 488.78
~ ~ y 9I .41 !CORNER~~, 1 ~ b 2. TBM - CAP 9. 5/A' IRON ROD WITH CAP :ds t?•~.~,= N 20977.38 •~',1'~,?
~ a R R ~ CORNER EE c N 21454..E ` E 10436.94 ELEVATION 490.84
~ ~ ~ E 9094.E ~ ~ ? i. a COI2Y~R x 5 ~ / N 21424.'24-. tw ~ y., E 9510.28 3. TBM - CAP II. 5!B' IRON ROD WITH CAP N 20222.19
~ e LgiNER N 21 U2.43 ~ o ~ eCOtUER E 11115.25 ELEVATION 477.97
~ ~ ` ~ ~ E 9112,11 ti x 21413.42 a CORNER ' ~ E 9528.58 N 21364.40 ~ ~ ~ _ T T 7 y ~ .t CORNEh ~ ) _ ~ E 10 13.5 BM*l BENCHMARK INFORMATION FROM SURVEY AT NCGS MONUMENT 'VANCO'
X$1442.71, i -a` h'Z N 2132!.71 - - _ _ E 9106.36 / , ) ~ ? E 9664.65 N 23021.07, E 11203.26 ELEVATION 513.07
- $ 1~ , `t' - e CORNEA I , ` e GORIER - , _ ) N 21274.89 ~ ' .N 21348:05 ! E 10771.52 ~ C ~ , '
22 tt , / ~ ~ ' t [.9160.20 / t '
~ 7 / S`:J' ~ - I i ' - e CORNER ` I - / 6p 9 JQ, 1 CORNER N 21192.90 ! / J6• ~ E 10828. B9 IER 12.90 !8.89
3~ ~ ~ ~ ' . ~r i 1 / 47u I N 21168 6T y ~ €1 8 x fi ~ •h ~ ~ / ~ / P Ei9955.30 , 'O ,
- - - ge'h ~M;,- %k~ ~ \ / I ~ t eCORNER ~ ~s a~ / r ~ RDHOUSE,. z° ~ ' 1 _ , x 2111,.zB -t CORNER N 21111.20
I s~ / ~ ~ 2 , ~ / ~ ~ E 10886.72 ; ; r f ~ r ! E 10886.72
~ , ! 1 ` -aCr - 11 2b r N 11014.97 a = - _FrR.E=-PUMP ~ I'7~IVp~C, E 10459.41 ~ ~ e CORNER - ~y C„ ` r ~ t ` N 21028.17 e CORNER N 21028.17
' _ _ _ --c.-- _---~~~y-"_" `^F* f1 `?1 „ ? + E 10942.53 e COAXER - - - - - - - _ _ ti.. / ` ~ l E 10942.53
N 2097 .67 ~ _ ,4+. - - - =a - - / - h E 85 ,g - _ _L_ \ ii - ~ ~ ecoANER ~ g ~ 6 - q; ~ l N 20941.9 x > } it CORNER N 20941.94
se - . $ q nom` ~ !~G i 10993.21 S _ a re ~ , E - E , E 10993.26
fl _ _ _ ' NER ' ~ ~ / _ - 'w , ~ ~ 2881351 ~ ~ ~ ~ - e CDR It CORNER °
~ d E 8 91 ~ - I. ( I- j 1~ 1" 1 N 208 / > i I(( II i I 'a r` ~ i ' ~ _ E 111 7~ y , ,~"~PNER } s!~ ilia ~ ~ ' f i ~ z i N 20851.40 _ E 11035.78
+S ~ :208 7 - _ _ 1 .1 _ 8585. - _ - _ 1 4 %;'rl, r' ~ ,
_ _ ? D82S- - mss" \:b~ - ~ i~ ~ T ~I~ i~~fl --i ' ~ nri... ~l 4 CORNER N 20758.08
t _~at _ - -s i , g E 11072.01 $ o m W: W c - ~ um ~u mu5> -
, - - ' 1 ~1 , ir, ~ ,q • - 1 - an o.e ei V. CORNER A .
, ' , : , N 20662.62 E 11101.88
f ii ' ' _ ' - i Z
8 ~ ~ ---t~~_-_- I; i ~-f-~-f~ T~• {I 1. !fi. .~.~I .-f. ~.I I r~~-~" O t CORNER N 20565.84 - E 11127.25 U
ip a_ i / nSh ~ ~ 1 \ ' ~ i 1' f ~ -I [ 1 I I I I t i , 1 i t 1 ' ' Y_ 9.. /
~ ! i fl i~ 1 t `1 I I 1 1 1 jl 1 11 I~ ~';,1 - `A" , n TRAILF~FL-PJt ~ I' I. I c `I I ' I I. 11. .i .~i . i.~°L- i ~ ` (L 2f
~ ~ , - ~ 'i ; 1 j ti i ; ~ i i - - - N 20467.68 J X ;;yy + E 11146.56 W cl)
, _ ~ 1 r.- - _ . , - - : , . _ I , I ~ , I I ~ ~ ~ - _ _ _ - { , D Y D~
x / u: - _.-~'~p '-Arlo;-~-- - - - Y \ is ~ ~ R R / ~1~ M~1 I I' I IT"'~ 4 `,1 1 Q ~~1 ~ Q CORNER W w N 20368.63 O 0
.i 9 ,'„t'' 4, ~ FF I~L~ 80.¢8 ; , Q , _ {CORNER ~ T - - ~ ' E 11160.78 CD z rte, _ ~j w
N 20334. ' li I 1 I i " ~ E 7913.4 ~ . ` 'i TMG PARKING F~lEL;''(SLAND ' , ~ / ' i ~ .I s ~ I i li I r i 1 ` I ia' a' f` _ U
~ ~ , ~ `'s ~---~--~-~--r--r--rr-T-~--Tr--r -r,~--~~ P W _ , 1 h,, ~ - i € ~ € r' ~ ~ FUEL STORAGE. u ~ ~ ~=.~~t~ N CORNER Q N 20269.10 E 11.170.40 LL k: r +
• _ ~ _ _ >.ccaca,.. il`1---'--' - ' - - - spa,: I da _ Ili ~`F .i ` i Q I. 4„~;,,':
ro ~s ~ - , Iri'--~ i~', i ~i i i i i' I ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ '„I'. 4 ~ ~ `a'aa,a; t5 x5 ~ SS3~0 `,J"i7. ' ilf: a= .11•-.-:~._.~-.J.-_-Y?~.-._._.r.- 1._.~~-. _r in,IJ. ` e CORNER N 20169.21 z
' i I i / tiP I „1'; E 11175.84 Q
_ - i , i , I ~ / a I,~ ! + f S i 1 gill d'n,`t i : r a~ ~ 41,1, CL - t CORNER
READY LINE --r•"1 r,-~.- I I~ I ~I 1 ~,1 I , ~1~,1a .-1~.-_-.~-. -.-Y ~ i ~ 4nni ~ ~ , .e,CORNER ' I M. •I ~ I 1 ~ , I , I ` ,I,a it N 20069.27 E I1I80.09 Iwge t Z
, 1• " N 20127 35 • " ~ E 8215. D2 s ' - I 1 I 1 f h I I I f; ! i ~7, 1 .1 s _ _ _
' - "NS. - - i is € I ' ( I ~t~ .E..- - _ _ _ _ _`_i , , y,, d ~ a. Q { , ' yt; algal fr ih N 19969.27 ir
C. ~ ' ' A ' , _ i .hr=E 11183.49
.-.E-.-i-.- _.r.y. .y. - / a +f . , / ~
`t: I It CORNER J
i C 4,s a _ N 19846.72 ---I E 11187.92 Q
_ I I I I _ _I I ~ I - I - I - -I - I ,s' • '%~,,E~Bbj• `'"~i•__/306.T4' - - -1 -~i---1--- -._i_ EFR G I~TIQI~ . . - I i ~ ~ ~ G,~, ~ - w - Cp 306.74' _ W
° ~ ° Q ~ - - 4' 1D'W 1 s t a C CORNER O \ N 19724.36
~.W C \ ,trl ? € E 11192.34
~ ~ , W lr, / ~ 1 ` I I I I I -I ~ 1 - I - I - I- I `a ,e'. .e . L[~I' y' ? ` 296-71'
~ • , ~ ~ ~ ENERGY C I~TE ~ ! ~ 1 ~ 4 \ ~42''3ZE Y ~ -Y ) I I_ I 1 I I I ~ I I[ a e o „ '`I , A ~h82 f g2o42'`SZ E
t 3 F" -I I ' I I I I j-.~.,I• ~1 I I i / r:q,' ~~1 A ~,eCORNEA / ~ ~ - " r" # . ~ . l.al, ' I x I %86.70 ti, _ - - e CORNER. 19686.70
$ , , H . ._4 a La 110898. ft Q CORNER N 19624.37
'tl / rO t~~ _ _ _ ~;6 v ' E 11195.95
i ~ t -------=~a-~~'4 ~ , , , ~ ~ - RKING
, . , y a. ~ ~ - , - - - - ' ' o .z BE
a ~ a - TRAIL G,, ' W EEC g„
s 1~11~1 ~ - ~~;1111=~ ~+,5,r _ ~~I .jll ~~I - Il '~f_ ~6p~5 ~_a fur- i ~ m I N o 3
v~.` /1~ - - ~ - I - - E ~om~sa '
~ ) - Yid _ ,li - -„-„i./ f 2+. ter. _ I.ti, ~I . r w ~ _ L Va
`t 35° 00' 00" d m- ot-=„ PLAN TRUE NORTH 0
~ ~ ~I - , ` NORTH x ° -2
, - N 19235.84 {{I` it 1 , l , u u
E~ ~ I 1 I~I , ; ~j ' i E 8580.00 1 { ! I ~ . i Y- ~ ~ w ' _ J J[J~Y.A J/l• 1 lsl,?. f5 I i i
' _ r II t , V r ~ , ~ i ,
d ~ ~ / ~ 6
Ran J0"J . ~ / , ,
sn _ ,
33jj Y ~ ~ _ 933.33'~'~ / M 19016.84 i
3b_ 8 ki - Tf 90°60' 0a'M~- / ~ ' E 9935.58 i . d _ r GORIER ~ - - F - , a CORNER - - _ , i t SHEET f
~o yogi - N 18971.94• ~ N 18974.94 ~ ~ E 9893.09 E 8959.76 0 0 100 200 300 400 C3.01
~ ; _ w - ne : i OVERALL -GRADING PLAN k GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET
° C3.01 SCALE ~ I ° 100' sJm°
~;-a i~, d`a Copyright © 2004 by Carter & Burgess,Inc.

BENCH MARKS:
, _--.-t---Talk--Ckr-$,-- - tROM ROO-tn TifCAP---- Pt.__-•~~ . - - N 21102.21 o`' s'
, R NE a 7154 R4/ ~ E 9622.15 ELEVATION 488.78 W^ ~f
N 117 ,43 q 4 , . ~ 9I .41- E 918 ` ~ ~ G R CORNER 2. TOM - CAP 9, 5A' IRON ROD WITH CAP N 20977.38
~ ~ Sl 8 CORNER N, t E 10436.94 ELEVATION 490.84
~ E 9091.E - l e COAN~R \ ~ - N 21124.-2i,. 3. TOM - CAP II, 5N' IRON ROO WITH CAP N 20222.19
~ e CORNER , S., E 9510.28 ~ N 21172,13 o ~ e CpiNER E 11115.25 ELEVATION 477.97
$ ~ E 9112.41 ) ti' N 21413.42 l e LOANER BM*I BENCHMARK INFORMATION FROM SURVEY AT NCG$ MONUMENT 'VANCO'
~ y y ; ~ - .e CORNEA }I ' E 9528.58 E 10763.57 CORNER' ~ ,j' ~i - - E 4106?16) ` I ~,2 N 21379.17 •n ~ / ! t ~ ` E%69.65 \ eC011NEA N 23021.07. E 11203.26 ELEVATION 513.07
- , ~ I t_ a A j "1 N 21274.89 19
t ' j ~ :N 21 X8.05 ` ( E 10771.52 R R , r 4.9160,20 1 i2
J! ' f _ - / ~ J ` I 7 - e CORNER 7 S 6 Jg 1 ~r ' ~ t p Jp, N 21192.90 CORNER 21192.90
~ Y ~ ~ ~ ~ ' 7 ! ! J6, CORIfA ~ E 10828.89 8 8 ~ e~ 1~y~ ~ ' ( 47U ~ i 1 r P N 21168,6, `x. o : r } 1 _ - _ _ ~ / ~ g , _ - ~ .1 / , 419955.70 0 ~ , - 10828.89
~ ~ ~ ~6~ , i 1..X7 s~,i E 1 r % o ' ~ eCORNER It CORNER N 21111.20
~ ,a ~1' RDHOUSE~i l r N znn.2a f+ E 10886.72 E 10886.72
`>a.1 ~ - ~ ~ ~ ~ ! } ~ ` 1( i i ~ U r S ' S ! e CORNER ~ r.P. t 1 „ / S ~4 _ _ _ _ -•(r ( m:<,. ~ B9 ~ N 21011.97 Sr w:,~ ~za: a LOANER Jy ~(i a\ 1 - - _ ~ F1~REPUMP, U E 10459.97 r C CORNER
, n'1\ 1 _ ~ .il~! _ P ~ ~ i, X21028.17 r~a\ _ ' L_~ =-__-_'r-:-- - 2,~~~ _ - - -l E 10942.53 CORNER ' i } ~ - ...--~-"-."--"'.Ex rcr = - - - ~ e ( ~ . N 21028.17 °C - E 10942.53 d !g
N 2097 .6, _..1/+ _.L.^~.. J~_. c~ _ - - _ t`~ e^' ~ ~ E 85 .9fi _ _ _ ~ ~ i _ _ ? _ 1 _ ~ ~ CORN „ _ e =a ; „ ` _ _ a. / N e CORNER
- h - R p _ . - - ~ ~ ~ \ i - . f 2094 f , _ , b' d ~ - ~ _ _ - ~ . ~ ` E 1099 N 20941.94 E 10993.26
b _ - - - _ ~ 7" ~ - _ - - - - 20881,51 , ---"K----f-^~.-..~ i ~
E 8491.35 + \ i:. T. s~t;L._='.3',- ~ e r , R.~ r- ~ I r ' It CORNER N 20851.40 -
r, .CORNER ~ ~ lam. 6^ 9 _ 4. , , t , ° N; aoe~.2, ~ ' } ~ Iii -~r-. i v~ E 11035.78
8 -a- / 8585.75' ~ t i b ,fir 'I ~ _ _ - _ 1~ I' , ~ , i- ca-. - - ~ - ~ - _ - : _ - ~ t R CORNER
oa,5.n - - - _ _ - ~R~I ER .F~. RIC~' , _ _ _ . _.w e-= 2 - - - - ~ 'P N 6 _ "4 F - - N 20758.08 m E 11072.01 u o io
f~ 'S' .cam i!i I~~ I ~h ' -
„ , _ 1 r~_ ' , - V - fl ~ ~ - - - ~`1 Q CORNER c o 0 r , N 20662.62 1 E 11101.88
' - - _ _ - , ~_...._:__c_____:._ -k-60 '}~tf_= - ~ 1 I I I II I ! I "'1 I ~i ;f„' ~s~.' ;
1° ~ f- _ _ - - - - ~ I r~ I . i _ 1 11 I .kF. 1 'I ."T. ~j , r. ~~,,1~ ~ yh ~y~,'•U,4 -'-Z`:~_°=---- t;, I• ~"1; I i' i 1 f 1 i ~I i, i C CORNER 0 1 N 20565.84 N U
~ :a 0 , _ 1 4 U 1 I I I 1 I i I I I I ; , E 11127.25
~ a it / \ ( ~ q ~ I+ .'~P„ I I ; I i i 1 f 1 ; I I I ~ a,V " ; a .i
i h ~lil.'!t!i l8dli ~ ' ~ ~ 7 ~ 7 i I I I 1 .Ti, .y.~ I ~ wt\ RAILER=f' 6. ~ _ ' , IlPIA iE~ r' . 1 , . , .w}~y~~A!~ ~ a~ CORNER d Z N 20467.68 Z E 11146.56 W W
, , r-:~ ~,1(~~111 ~lii mwYp.___________________ y,. tl i J _ _ _ _ 4
a ~ a 'I i'I ~ j r I ~j~' ~Q ~ i i i I,' - s a i Ill ' '1 -I-• I - - - ".';`,ts r a ~ ° i µ ~~tliy;itll ~ k .,i r~,:: .~'~.p~ai- Y \ ` , - o w H Q CORNER
n n ~ Illdlll~ IAr;r+ - ~ - ~ FFI L ~pp0.88 Q, Nr ~ . , ~ 7 CORNEA ~ I.F,; ~ 50 6' I I ~ i Y i i rd I' ~ a i lauli A- I i N 200368368. .63 O E 11160.78 (0 Z
N 20334. s I ~ ~ - - - I IIRIIlI RvC w(~ -1-1;;, .-•-~-.-•T~--~ ~~,-~~-~-r-~~-;-~ - a, - r r ~ , ~ 4,913.4 r 111'IOp TMG"' - PARKING tiEOYAN~- I II I I 1 I I i i~ ~ a,, . F.llEL,'`IS~AND , w r k U =
r~ j lR~181~ ~ 1 .I ~A I I II E 1 E 3` 1 I I' 4 ~ I . IlPiili' , I i r---~ ~ T ~ t--t T T--~i -J,~r ~ r P W ' - ~ C CORNER ' r N 20269.10
_ ~ s 5 -,~~_.~liluu,I I 'z ; FUELi STiOf~~,GE'\ it i i ,`I i i r , ' ' . E II1TO.40 LL
, ~ I ; f I ! _ 1,1 I 6, T~~~I l - { i . .1 I i I 'i Q 7~~+~ r„ ~ ~ tiSJ ( ill(- ~IIllill , 1 ~ f an~,1H r - d d J ~o• r l~l I I I. I I; I I I I I I~ I I R CORNER
J, ' S' ~-1 jet I f" ~n;L d'nh. ~ ~ ~ ~ 7 oy~~,, Tiit~(IITi [ F ~ ; r { 1' I ! ~ I j I ~ I i I 1 ,1~ I ,'I I, I - r.!• ~,,,p II d +r1V ' N 20169.21 E 11175.84
a ~ ~ + _ 111Ia1i'i lull _ r. .,r. „I - ~I 1 - - - ~ I I f I ; I I~ ! I t 3 ~ I 'I I { '~-1 . r , ~ I r ,-I , . 1 ~ ~ Y I , ,r , ~,I _.,,..._.~._.r. .r.~ - -Y._.~C_._.T._.y.~.~._, I ';91 ~ I 9 I; I , I , I li 1 1,` I rl I I I ~ ~,tt ;1~ - - , '~Eti +Iin Iil i~
, READI~-LINE x. 1 _ _ _ ,_I _ _ ~''k" ~ CORNEA _ "I"'-I )'r-1.% I I I _ 1 ,t _ I _,I -I-, I! r"'I~ ~Ne~l~ a CORNER -•ht~ Ft'~`.rt; N 20069.27
- X"20122,35-- _ , 3 -o ~ E 8215.02 Z ~ ~ ~~~}~A iS "'r t i I ' I I' I ~i a ,~;if ~liEyl _ ,vv ii, I I I I i, E 11180.09 0 Z
~ ~ Dc 3~ N,~,, ! fiti i ! ,t-- -r• - , ~ ~r alp JJ ~ ~ is ° n x~ ,.W.eJ I ` ` ~ " r ¦ s s _ N. \ p-_.-__-__ ~ i, i ~ A { I I 1 I' I 1~ 1 6 I 'i 1Qjl t 'rR N,• (p J dw,! CORNER
; f N 19969.27 t •t t„ I E 11183.49
} '..I" - - nowt P 6 'i%' ~,r, ~ } I, I I I I ! Vro l 1 I I I I t I E -v. y,,. =i~i rffsr Q cc
I,I i ( CORNER 0
_____.-~~1u~411 E Z I I I i i i i i i i i i i C v I ~ y,y, ~ ~ ~ ~ g8i~illl ~-'i-'-'~-'-i---i-•- ~ - ~ - I C a r, o r~1,k._ r'I~LORNER.'.--~=""':' - N 19846.72 W E 11187.92
$ ~!lI~i1U 1 ~ ~ a uT"„ 'THk~8~i7' - i~ " , b r 4 ~'11 i ~ I I I I I ! I L I I 1 _ I- I o ~ r o ,n, .-s~- 14, ' 30'6 7'
1 111X111{~---°--------- Q 1 .t \ 111 _~d ' ~ - ~ ~~4~ - } IGE,~ Ip~i I I._ I I ~;5 1 ,1 w,q ,1:;,,~,-'- 562° io'w %i ~ , << I~ilh' r ..wtn._!_._I_._ -'~CPi~ I 1 _r~ 7 -m 1~ 7 '.a ~ ® t ar~ ~ , ~1~ ru:',,-• \ = 41O'W ~ 0 5 \ \ e CORNER
8 w 61(11, - I f rr' I;`p , ' ,,t \ N 19724.36 E 11192.34
;ml, W~ i I f ~..sAY.., , ri/ 11. ~ , ~ I I I I I I i I I i I 'a .m,;,,w .t_. ~+`I' ~I1i i=: ~ ,
6 ~ e Iii( ~ _ - - - - - - - - - - , t}., Zr ,u+, , I y 96:71' Y ~ Y r 1 Q ~ ~NE~iGI~ C NTE~ ~ -s ® ~ v ~'3•E } 11=-- Ie ~ I -I -I i I ~ I I I .L, I - 1 I i '"L; I X+62°4 ~ ~ ~ - ' ' - - - I 2 . 296_yl• V ` H 82°42' 3ZE
~o~~ eL a„1ER
I .J' 1 - \}~\1' ~~y},~. II \ N I%86,.10 s ~ t , 5',~''. ter;: - - ~ _ ~ "i„ ~ ~ ) 4,10898. d2 4 1! N 19686.70 B,10898.62 It CORNER
' ~ ~ n ~ -p , N 19624.37 \ E '11195.95
~ e! 'u..: I " 1118e ! ~~t~l _ r__=_ ~~JVVIA ItE , { ~ ~ ~ N f` -~-err;. - ®--4 if :$-j>,,M - j- i-_-'• ii r } - h _ , - _ I S ~m
- , ' ._d~_-. w, C N W W rv
~ ~ - RAILF~i--PARKiP1G,_ ,tali - ~ ~r - of - - 'M' - , E1 W O
111 11``l~ -1_~~I II ilk I1 ' ~`!#41j s Ilill" yqi~' YSg}5 1~,._. ~ fir La i O[ n^g m oin F L NLL m
, ..ice. ~ I'll - - - , , w..,.. o S I It 1 'Sa A
e ~ ~ W _ - - - y'?fir r,_ -c'~,~-~---------- ~ m m ? W C .S -a- i8l m ~ L
~ m . , m ~ ie' - ..x. - - O ~ mtl~OP
~ q PLAN TRUE NORTH NORTH
" 1 P - ~ _ .~m,~. ; , N 19235.84 ,(..~.,,.r , j ,1 V as
i ~ ~ H E 6580.00 i 'IE~~ 3,( r 3 , , , , r ~ to ,ri , I 1 uu c
6 ~ _ A ~ ! \ '1 5• ~ ~ ~ s ~-+-.rt~~ - - v ~,,1~ it ii Ip~ 9y~ f ~ c
c
¦ ~ g S
r~ 1 1l a CORNER ~ .I ~ 1 -N 19016.84 t
~ ~ _ 931.31 =,-w-T- ~ ' E 9935.58 !o w„oF i..ii N90°OU'UO i eCOANER C SHEET
$ "i a e COAIffA. e e o N 18979.94 ~ r N 18974.94 • g ~ ; f r 4959.16 - / E %93.09 L 0
~ 1 OVERALL -STORM DRAIN PLAN molawsl0m 100 200 300 400 C4.21 GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET
>s„~ C4.21 SCALE i' iD0' ~Jto i
sots ~,8a
Copyright © 2004 by Carter & Burgess, Inc.

MAINTENANCE NOTES: _ _ ;•~R,~ss>~s
t _ . _ ,..n.urryrM ryri
= a a a t - i. ALL EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PRACTICES WILL BE INSPECTED FOR STAB IL[TY ~ 1 ~ ~ d ANO OPERATION Ai LEAST ONCE EVERY SEVEN CALENDAR OAY$ AND WITHIN 24 HOURS ~ I ` COVERAGE FOLLOWING RAINFALL OF 0.5 INCHES DR GREATER. ALL SEDIMENT CONTROL FEATURES
n 8 SHALL BE NAINTA INED UNill FINAL STABILIZATION HAS BEEN OBTAINED. , ~ S E A R A
2. LOCATIONS WHERE VEHICLES ENTER/EXI1 THE SITE MUST BE INSPECTED FOR EVIDENCE OF OFF-SITE SEDI Ni ~ t TALL FESCUE ME TRACKING. A iEAPOAARY GRAVEL CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE/EXIT 80 LBS. PER ACS ~ WILL BE CONSTRUCTED AT EACH LOCATION WHERE VEHICLES ENTER/EXIT, AND EACH ~ V ~ SEAICEA LESPEDEZA
i 20 LBS. PER ACRE $ ~ ENTRANCE WILL 8E H/INTAINED OR SUPPLEMENTED AS NECESSARY TO PREVENT SEDIMENT KOBE LESPEDEZA ~9 FRpA LEAVING THE SITE. i T 10 LBS. PER ACA
~ ~ k` E , , ' 1 ~ '1 "y' > S : ~ 4 3. SEDIMENT BARRIERS MUST BE INSPECTED, AND IF NECESSARY, NJSi BE AR ' ~ , 5 ENL CED OR ~ , TEI~ORARY CLEANED IN OROEA 10 PROVIDE ADDITIONAL CAPACITY, ALL MATERIAL E%CAVAi I ~ E~•-`` SEEDED AREAS
~ ~ BEHIN ED FROM - ~ 0 $EDIAPNT BARRIERS WILL 8E STOCKPILED ON ixE UPSLOPE SIDE. ADDITIONAL ~ ~ t RYE (GRAIN( SEDIMENT BARRIERS MUST BE CONSTRUCTED A$ NEEDED. P'~^ 120 LBS. PER ACRE
' Ta.~' J g 4. INSPECT IONS W0.L EVALUATE DISilA8E0 AREAS AND AREAS USED FOR SiOR[NG a ~ - _ r r j J ~
~ ~ ~ MATERIALS THAT ARE EXPOSED TO RAINFALL FOR EVIDENCE OF OA TH P - ' E OTENTIAL FOR, i Y / / A POLLUTANTS ENTERING THE DRAINAGE SYSTEM. IF NECESSARY, THE MATERIALS MUST ~ ~ - / t BE COVERED, OR ORIGINAL COVERS MUST BE REPAIRED OA SUPPLEMENTED. ~ ~ 4~ • 1
PROTECTIVE BERMS CONFOANING TO 8/C5.11 MAST BE CONSTRUCTED IF NEEDEDS~N ORDER 1 , J i ~I ~ ~ ~ TO CONTAIN RUNOFF FAON MATER A 1J// ~ / t ~ ~ I L $i01tAGE AREAS. / - , / ~ ~ ~ 1
5. GRAS e, , , c ' I / ~ J SED AREAS WILL BE INSPECTED TO CONFIRM THAI A HEALTHY STAND OF GRASS IS Tt. - + G ARDHOUSE„/ ; ' ,r' i ` ~ ~ NA INTAINEO. , _ r ! , I
;a .0.~• i ' ~1F~ PUMP h~OU ~ + J , pp 6. ALL INSPECTIONS ARE TO BE DONE BY THE SIT ^-r / 1 r +E use E CONTRACTOR. . ~i" - ! / ,
apt r t, _ . - - _T~UCK SC~tLE/, ,
- - _ tit ~ - T - - _
' -.r ,`-`=s¢~-'`?,;,;~.' yr' ,r / 1.~, _ - - -
A
n ~ r ~ ~ p - - , .i ~ Q45 J""k - f fi r ~ a I ~ ! < =
a ~'S , n r 1 ray-.,, r'+~~F,F , ,~i. , J ~ - _ ` ...r ,i, fff~/' :fit , CPEf F~ t ffkr~ ~f<<~ , CtiECK M _
- - - 5 iv ,lAil ~ f r ~6 7f - - _ ~ -~'°w-'~=-r_- 1 l i'V,IIr .r~z .sir Q. .~r F~',`, - s t \ f f
',,1 f 1t~ ~ f tt ~ O
~ - ~ - Tyr
- _ _
- - ,r, w t - x ~ J 1 %,'~r-5'"~ ~ r - z h ''a I ' I~ ET.. y ~ ~ mY +1~ t
8iy ?r ~ I _ -=r'~_~ - iiy-'.fit __r %^sx~~;,t ~ , ~ 1. _ _ _ _ v - pppp~~ J - i--_- zG~- - _ ,,i ~ - I i I II I ! I ! I I I ',}T,_LTIONt~ t°
rr 1
~ ~ 1(/1,. I I /mar. 1, i~ I I ' I I I 1 1 3 1_i ] I ! , , i i:~y i ¢ ¢ ~ J / ICI (7- i ! - - - - - _ ~ J ••d ~ , s° °s~ 'e ` ; II /J tom/ ~ ~ ~t I`h- ~ ~ ~I -I ! ~f i I I I I -~I E l~~l ~ ! i 1 ,~~,'i l n ~m Kj l
p , 1 __-1 / PIfO Cil I , I' -~y.-.~ I t i I ti I ,t,A i t fs z
/ , ~ i ~ ~ ~ ~IAT ~ .r ~ , ~ it ( 1 - '`Yl// , ' I I i , r OTC - - -
y~ N I 111 II ~ - , - -4 Z Z
~,,,I; ' _i_, I I _ I_ III- f ~ I I I i I~ /y/~. IL Z
" , II I ~ TRA~TOR._ ~ a' I % I I li iii i ' i_ , , a ~ >r ~ r TMG ' ;HAY BAL6 -I-'~--,- - - - - _ x O W
a ~ PARKING r;, - ~ ~ ~ Y J - F.UEL!'•ISLANDII I I I I , 1 1._.~ . z. W T¢
, 1 ~ ~ ~~i-~~-~=~--I II- iri i ~`f E o I _ ahyaucacc~ ' , I1.,, r~ T T--1-~T-~ i<"("- '3 : - , ~H rn ow
0 ~ ~ / i~, - ~ ~ • FU~L~ STiORAGE`. i' i i ,'i J ~ .i _ i ~ ;;r ~ ~ - ~ t--- -7, b, Z i w
5 ~ _ . , , ~ 3 J ,r,'': , ~ ~ ( ~ ' ~ ~ 1.1 ~ ! f , I i I I I,' 1 1; I I ~ I
c I , il, ' ° , I ~ _ N.. - --f- , - ~ ~ _ ~ 1 std 4 c
~ ~ ~ ~ - _ , 7 -I J I - i I y• I ,'I I _ READY LINE ~ ,'I i, I r i.r.i -J~ - - ; - -
{ - - - ~ ._~"rt i'J-i.% I I I 1 I ~~I I C I 1 , _ _ f
~ i~---_---°• I c , I I I j11 I I i I, I , I t
.7 _ y y I "-~r ' I - I - - - - - - - - - - - - ' A I ~ r t ' AREA 400i~r-~ i , , . I I lr I I; 1 d' I; - + , ~ ~ ~ DRAWING LEGEND A i I' . , _ 1 2 `x'rr co
, _ . Z Z
i - , -«I I I I I I I I I I i i i i i ~ i~ I w t tv w CHECK OAM _ ~ ~ HA R~y p I~~ --+}'.-•t- -1 -•h•-i-•-i-'-i_I-'-1-•-1-' E SLY 0 Q iz _j
_Sg_ SEDIMENT BARRIER - C7 r.T.-h-.y.-.y.-.~.~ t•-~ ~ ,`T~, : , ' ~ ~ - , 1~"1 FWME INLET --~--.I .-.I-.__-. . _ #t i~r•~.^ / ,
PROTECTION to n;~a ~ ~ I I I ~ [ E I_ ~ ._I. .L-~~--• - _ W / y / Z Z O
~ R R ~ I - I--- i I --I-i I I L 1 I I_ I I_ ( I I • w t u t't - - I , ~ .,f , ~ - . - CONSTRUCT r Q - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ~ _ T _ _ e r' e -r-~---~- r~~„Yr • - ~ n it ION ENTRANCE ~ I ~i~FRIIG ' _ - f Cow
--~------I--I--I---- ERgTI I i i i~ i- - - o -I 1 - - 7,. ~ ~ ~ ~ ® EROSION CONTROL BLANKET Q ~ w w' w w ~°P i ~ '-Ts d ~t ---~_._.F._ WWZ
a ~ LIMITS OF CONSTRUCTION _ I I I ] I I / , CIO U
~ a ---..r - I • ,
~ 3 ~ RIP-RAP aPROn ~ i i I C~NTE~ 7' V ` I ~ i i i. - - - - ' "C ' ~
g , 'd ~ E 5 JJ I I I I I 1 1 I i I'i' I~ ' ! 1 .ail/dr ' t~; , 1, ~ ® CURB iNLETPROTECTION 1 I- ,I_ ~ t„~~ ~ ~~t }
~ ~ ~ ri 1„ 'I . $ p~i pp ~i ~!T ,
y ~ I°IM l i i{ 1 ® DADP/GRATE INLET PROTECTION 1 ' I _ 1„F~ ~ f , t
t`
_ ~ , , ~ ~ - INSTALLATION NOTES: ~ ~ _ _ TRAIL / ~ ~ - _ ~ Y-. ti
` ' jg ~ 1. CONTRACTOR i0 COMPLY WITH THE STORM WATER POlLU110N PREVENTION PLAN (SMPPPI ~11' ~,i I ~ ~ PREPARED FOA THIS PROJECT ALONG WITH ALL LOCAL, STATE AND FEDERAL " I ' ~ ~ ~ I ~ ( I k I I I! i ' --'fi'r c__,- r = i ' < REGULATIONS FOR SEDIMENT AND EROSION CONTR ~ I , ~ ~ ~ ! } I ' I' I I
2. CONTRACTOR HA _ ~ - `i _I _i ~ ~ a....... _ - / _ , S LL INSTALL aDO1TI0NAl SEDIMENT CONTROL BARRIERS A$ NECESSARY / t' _ y
TO CONTAIN ALL CONSTRUCTION SEDIMENT ON SITE. v _~--rte-. _ - ~ ' >.r . - -.ti- , I, i 3. CCNTRACTOR SHALL Ma[NTAiN ALL EROSION ANO SEDIMENT CONTROL BARRIERS DURING - - m 2 ~N
H ti CONSTRUCTION. - _ ~,°r W O V P g O O C o F n
4. ANY ACCIDENTAL RELEASE OF SEDIMENT FROM THE SITE SHALL BE CLEANED UP BY THE ' i' ~ CONTAACiOA, i ~ - : C ~ , - - m q~q I ~ N LL N :
~ ~ ' nYe ~ , - 5. CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE A TEMPORARY GRAVEL DAIYE FOR ALL CONSTRUCTION ! ~ t ' ` ~ ' 1° ° ' - y , i R ~ ACCESS ONTO EXISTING PavEO ROADS. , , ~ t°
n 1 ,n , i t ^ I ~ r , ~ I ~ ' : 6. CONTAACTOA SHALL REAgYE ALL SEDIMENT CONTROL BARRIERS AT THE COMPLETION OF _ , ~ ` m ea' 8 35° 00'00"
i s CONSTAUCT[ON, OR IF NECESSARY, AFTER ESTABLISHMENT OF PLANTING. " 4' ~ ' 1 r , r ah ~ _ i i ~ ~ o r ~ 7;; h 1. EARTH CONTAINMENT BERMS ARE iD BE LOCATED ALONG PEA (METER Of ALL AREAS OF ~ ~ F~, TRUE NORTH ~~a= PLAN
y TEMPORARY FUEL STORAGE AND HANDLING, RE: 8/C5.11. - ~ 1 NORTH L
_ ~ ALL PERMANENTLY EXPOSED SUES H J i ~ - ',,6~ ' W W RE: S ALL BE STABILIZED AS PER THE CRASS 1ABLE, _.-;~o~ J ; ~ - ~ ~ ~ ' r J y e C5.01. _ - I :y
i a / ~ - _ { 9. MITHIN 14 DAYS AFTER CONSTRUCTION ACTIY T ~ 6~ 4; ~ `S"+.- ~d"`*7:w,'`' I Y TEMPORAA ILY OR PERMANENTLY CEASES ~ri~ ~~2 .,.-.,,,r. ae.!,.~ J ` Vu
a ; ~ IN ANY PARTICULAR AREA, ALL DISTURBED GROUND WHERE THERE MILL NOT BE . _ , ~ ' CONSTRLK:TION FOR LONGER THAN 21 DAYS MUST BE iE1PORARILY OR P RM ~ - - dd d 4`% ° SEEDED AND MULCHED. E ANENTLY ( -
Io. ousr CDNTR I 1 aN OL SHALL BE PERFORMED BY THE CONTRACTOR BY APPLYING WATER A$ r - - / ' REOUiRED. ~
/ i J { g II. SED[IENT BARRIERS SHALL BE PLACED IMAEOIATELY DOWNSL / / OPE OF ALL STOCK PILES. ~ r . aF Y J
~"ng 12. ALL PERMANENTLY E%POSED SLOPES SHALL BE STAB[L 12E0 WITH A NAi ~ U._, / E REFER TO C5.01 FDR PERMANENT SEED MI%. LYE SEED MI%, t J.` / -
nz n^~ ~ no u° 13. C~•8' SHALL BE USED FOA ALL ROCK OUTFALL EROSION PR -
OTECTION. I EROSION AND SEDIMEN n-e' a 14. NAY BALE SHALL BE INSTALLED AROUND THE SLOTTED PANE DRAIN UNTIL THE CONSTRUCTION TATION CONTROL PLA r Is COMPLETED, C5.01 SCALE: i'=100' N 0 SHEET
0 ~ 0 100 200 300 400 !
~o~ GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET C5.01
Copyright © 2004 by Carter & Burgess,inc.