HomeMy WebLinkAbout20191652 Ver 1_More Info Received_20200221Strickland, Bev
From: Brad Luckey <bluckey@pilotenviro.com>
Sent: Friday, February 21, 2020 11:38 AM
To: David.E.Bailey2@usace.army.mil; Homewood, Sue
Subject: [External] Fwd: Request for Additional Information: Meadow Valley s/d, High Point,
Guilford Co.; SAW-2018-02095
Attachments: 17-066-MV_LiftStation-Stream Location_200221.pdf, ATT00001.htm
Ulmr."rExternal email. Do not click links or open attachments unless you verify. Send all suspicious email as an attachment to
ort.s am nc. ov
See attached.
brian@shugarthomes.net
Thanks
Brad Luckey
336-708-4997
Sent from my iPhone
Begin forwarded message:
From: "joe@greenmountainengineers.com" <joe@greenmountainengineers.com>
Date: February 21, 2020 at 11:18:54 AM EST
To: Brad Luckey <bluckey@pilotenviro.com>
Subject: RE: Request for Additional Information: Meadow Valley s/d, High Point,
Guilford Co.; SAW-2018-02095
Joseph "Joe" V. O'Buch, P.E.
joe@greenmountainengineers.com
Green Mountain Engineering, PLLC
7A Wendy Court
Greensboro, NC 27409
Office: (336) 294-9394, ext 2
Cell: (336) 847-5090
1
From: Brad Luckey [mailto:bluckey@pilotenviro.com]
Sent: Friday, February 21, 2020 8:17 AM
To: joe@greenmountainengineers.com
Subject: FW: Request for Additional Information: Meadow Valley s/d, High Point, Guilford
Co.; SAW-2018-02095
Joe —see below. I don't think my phone sent it through yesterday. Give me a call to discuss on
my cell. Thanks.
Sincerely,
Bradley S. Luckey, PWS
336.708.4997 (c)
336.310.4527 (o)
PO Box 128
Kemersville, NC 27285
www.pilotenviro.com
bluckeykpilotenviro. com
From: Bailey, David E CIV USARMY CESAW (USA)
[mailto:David.E.Bailey2@usace.army .mil]
Sent: Thursday, February 20, 2020 3:09 PM
To: Brad Luckey <bluckey@pilotenviro.com>
Cc: Homewood, Sue <sue.homewood@ncdenr.gov>
Subject: RE: Request for Additional Information: Meadow Valley s/d, High Point, Guilford Co.;
SAW-2018-02095
Hi Brad, and thanks for your response to our request for additional information. The remaining
concerns I have about the proposed project pertain to the overall plan sheet included with your
response. Given the potential for impacts to waters of the US on the adjoining parcel (PIN
180005740000100068), please revise the overall plan sheet to show road stub -outs, cul-de-sacs,
or other turn-arounds to be contained on the parcel proposed for development by the applicant.
This includes the area currently showing a stream crossing, but with a note that states that the 3
lots are no longer proposed. This information is required to show that the overall development
proposed is single and complete, and could function independently without the additional 3 lots
or conceptual development shown on the adjoining parcel.
Also, please provide contact information including an email address for the new applicant point
of contact, Mr. Brian Shugart.
Please submit the requested information above (via e-mail is fine) within 30 days of receipt of
this Notification, otherwise we may deny verification of the use of the Nationwide Permit or
consider your application withdrawn and close the file.
Please let me know if you have any questions.
-Dave Bailey
David E. Bailey, PWS
Regulatory Project Manager
US Army Corps of Engineers
CE-SAW-RG-R
3331 Heritage Trade Drive, Suite 105
Wake Forest, North Carolina 27587
Phone: (919) 554-4884, Ext. 30.
Fax: (919) 562-0421
Email: David.E.Bailey2@usace.arm
We would appreciate your feedback on how we are performing our duties. Our automated
Customer Service Survey is located at: http://corpsmapu.usace.army.mil/cm_apex/Pp=136*0
Thank you for taking the time to visit this site and complete the survey.
From: Brad Luckey <bluckey@pilotenviro.com>
Sent: Tuesday, January 28, 2020 11:22 AM
To: Bailey, David E CIV USARMY CESAW (USA)<David.E.Bailey2@usace.army.mil>;
Homewood, Sue <sue.homewood@ncdenr.gov>
Cc: Greg Garrett <greg@shugartmanagement.com>
Subject: [Non-DoD Source] RE: Request for Additional Information: Meadow Valley s/d, High
Point, Guilford Co.; SAW-2018-02095
David and Sue,
Please find the attached and below responses. Please let me know if you require additional
information to complete your review. Thanks.
NCDWR Comment 1) The overall plan sheet text indicates that there are "stormwater ponds" but
I only see one pond (I think, based on the scale I'm not quite certain). Can you please provide a
plan sheet that shows the location of all stormwater ponds within the development at a clear
scale.
Applicant Response: See attached updated overall map showing locations of stormwater ponds.
NCDWR Comment 2) Based on the stream determination documents I have (attached), stream
SE was determined to be perennial (Pilot map) but I think it is shown as intermittent in the
application documents. Can you please clarify/double check.
Applicant Response: The stream is perennial. See attached updated PCN and plan sheets.
USACE Comment 1) The plansheet showing the overall development indicates that a portion of
the development (PIN 180005740000100068) was not included in the delineation verified in the
field on 7/10/2018. There are two areas of concern based on geomorphic position and remotely
sensed data (aerial photos and LiDAR) that require field evaluation:
a. The drainage including and upstream of Stream ESA 1-5 delineated as part of the
sewer corridor component of the Meadow Valley s/d;
b. The entirety of the broad topographic depression centered at Lat/Lon 36.041578,
-80.033232;
Please evaluate both of these areas for the presence/absence of potential waters of the US,
including wetlands and streams. Provide wetland/upland data forms per the most recent
version of the Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Regional Supplement for these areas. We
also request the most recent version of the NCDWR stream form for the areas described
in item 1)a above. Based on the information provided, the Corps may require a
verification site visit for this parcel. If pictures and other provided information would be
helpful in facilitating an office verification, please provide that information as well;
USACE Comment 2) The plansheet showing the overall development indicates that the added
parcel identified above would be fully built out with residential dwellings and related
infrastructure. If potential waters of the US are found within the parcel above, either include the
proposed impacts in an updated PCN/plans, or re -design to avoid those areas;
Applicant Response: The applicant does not own or have options to purchase the parcel
indicated above. The above referenced parcel is not included in proposed overall site
development. Additional evaluation or consideration of this parcel is not warranted since it is
not part of the overall proposed project. See attached impact exhibits.
USACE Comment 3) The plansheet for Crossing "C" (sewer line) indicates that, in addition to
the proposed crossing, there would be sewer line running parallel to Stream SC extending both
east and west of the proposed crossing. Further, the field verified delineation included a narrow
corridor for future sewer in which several streams and wetlands were mapped. However, no
additional impacts related to the sewer are proposed in the PCN/plans. Further, we are unaware
of any separate sewer line projects constructed or proposed that would extend sewer parallel to
this stream and connecting to this development. Please provide plans for the overall development
clearly showing proposed utilities, including those that connect to existing off -site infrastructure.
This information is required to evaluate all cumulative impacts associated with this development.
If additional sewer impacts are required, please add them to the PCN and provide plans
accordingly.
Applicant Response: Wastewater will be pumped from the pump station towards Basswood
Avenue and connect to existing municipal sewer force main beneath Basswood Avenue. See
attached overall impact exhibit. There are no other impacts proposed to waters associated with
the development of the site or providing the site municipal sewer service outside of those
proposed within this application.
Sincerely,
Bradley S. Luckey, PWS
336.708.4997 (c)
336.310.4527 (o)
PO Box 128
Kemersville, NC 27285
www.pilotenviro.com
blu ckey2pilotenviro. com
From: Bailey, David E CIV USARMY CESAW (USA)
[mailto:David.E.Bailey2@usace.army .mil]
Sent: Wednesday, January 22, 2020 2:21 PM
To: Brad Luckey <bluckey@pilotenviro.com>; Greg Garrett <greg@,shugartmanagement.com>
Cc: Homewood, Sue <sue.homewood(cr�,ncdenr.gov>
Subject: RE: Request for Additional Information: Meadow Valley s/d, High Point, Guilford Co.;
SAW-2018-02095
Brad,
Thank you for your updated PCN and attached information, dated 1/8/2020 (received 1/9/2020),
for the above referenced project. I have reviewed the information and need clarification before
proceeding with verifying the use of Nationwide Permit 29 (Blockedhttp://saw-
reg.usace.army.mil/NWP2017/2017NWP29.pdo. Please submit the requested information below
(via e-mail is fine) within 30 days of receipt of this Notification, otherwise we may deny
verification of the use of the Nationwide Permit or consider your application withdrawn and
close the file:
1) The plansheet showing the overall development indicates that a portion of the
development (PIN 180005740000100068) was not included in the delineation verified in
the field on 7/10/2018. There are two areas of concern based on geomorphic position and
remotely sensed data (aerial photos and LiDAR) that require field evaluation:
a. The drainage including and upstream of Stream ESA 1-5 delineated as part of the
sewer corridor component of the Meadow Valley s/d;
b. The entirety of the broad topographic depression centered at Lat/Lon 36.041578,
-80.033232;
Please evaluate both of these areas for the presence/absence of potential waters of the US,
including wetlands and streams. Provide wetland/upland data forms per the most recent
version of the Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Regional Supplement for these areas. We
also request the most recent version of the NCDWR stream form for the areas described
in item 1)a above. Based on the information provided, the Corps may require a
verification site visit for this parcel. If pictures and other provided information would be
helpful in facilitating an office verification, please provide that information as well;
2) The plansheet showing the overall development indicates that the added parcel identified
above would be fully built out with residential dwellings and related infrastructure. If
potential waters of the US are found within the parcel above, either include the proposed
impacts in an updated PCN/plans, or re -design to avoid those areas;
3) The plansheet for Crossing "C" (sewer line) indicates that, in addition to the proposed
crossing, there would be sewer line running parallel to Stream SC extending both east
and west of the proposed crossing. Further, the field verified delineation included a
narrow corridor for future sewer in which several streams and wetlands were mapped.
However, no additional impacts related to the sewer are proposed in the PCN/plans.
Further, we are unaware of any separate sewer line projects constructed or proposed that
would extend sewer parallel to this stream and connecting to this development. Please
provide plans for the overall development clearly showing proposed utilities, including
those that connect to existing off -site infrastructure. This information is required to
evaluate all cumulative impacts associated with this development. If additional sewer
impacts are required, please add them to the PCN and provide plans accordingly.
Please let me know if you have any questions.
-Dave Bailey
David E. Bailey, PWS
Regulatory Project Manager
US Army Corps of Engineers
CE-SAW-RG-R
3331 Heritage Trade Drive, Suite 105
Wake Forest, North Carolina 27587
Phone: (919) 554-4884, Ext. 30.
Fax: (919) 562-0421
Email: David.E.Bailey2@usace.army.mil
We would appreciate your feedback on how we are performing our duties. Our automated
Customer Service Survey is located at:
Blockedhttp://corpsmapu.usace.army.mil/cm_apex/f?p=136 * 0
Thank you for taking the time to visit this site and complete the survey.
-----Original Message -----
From: Brad Luckey[mailto:bluckey@pilotenviro.com]
Sent: Thursday, January 9, 2020 12:24 PM
To: Bailey, David E CIV USARMY CESAW (USA)<David.E.Bailey2@usace.army.mil>; Greg
Garrett <greg@shugartmanagement.com>
Cc: Homewood, Sue <sue.homewood@ncdenr.gov>
Subject: [Non-DoD Source] RE: Request for Additional Information: Meadow Valley s/d, High
Point, Guilford Co.; SAW-2018-02095
David and Sue --please utilize these attachments. We caught some discrepancies in impact
numbers on the overall map that was previously provided and to avoid confusion I wanted to re -
send. No other changes outside of updated impact numbers on the overall impact drawing. I
apologize for the inconvenience. Thanks.
Sincerely,
Bradley S. Luckey, PWS
336.708.4997 (c)
336.310.4527 (o)
PO Box 128
Kernersville, NC 27285
BlockedBlockedwww.pilotenviro. com
bluckey@pilotenviro.com
-----Original Message -----
From: Brad Luckey
Sent: Wednesday, January 8, 2020 11:18 AM
To: Bailey, David E CIV USARMY CESAW (USA)<David.E.Bailey2@usace.army.mil>; Greg
Garrett <greg@shugartmanagement.com>
Cc: Homewood, Sue <sue.homewood(cr�,ncdenr.gov>
Subject: RE: Request for Additional Information: Meadow Valley s/d, High Point, Guilford Co.;
SAW-2018-02095
Good Morning David,
On behalf of the applicant, please find the attached information and below responses. Please let
me know if you require additional information. Thanks.
USACE Comment 1) Please note that stream and wetland impacts for additional phases of the
Meadow Valley s/d were authorized via NWP 29 and 12 on 9/12/2007. However, based on
evaluation of the previously permitted plans, our site visit in 2018, and the most recent aerial
photography, none of the authorized impacts were constructed. Further, the NWP 29 and 12
verification dated 9/12/2007 has since expired. As such, the currently proposed stream and
wetland impacts will be evaluated as the entirety of proposed impacts for the Meadow Valley
single and complete project
Applicant Response: The applicant acknowledges.
2) Provide a plan view of the lot layout and infrastructure (roads, utilities, stormwater, etc.)
for the entire proposed Meadow Valley s/d overlaid on a survey of the stream and wetland
delineation approved by the Corps. This plan is necessary to evaluate avoidance and
minimization measures and potential indirect impacts for the project
Applicant Response: Please see attached.
3) Is rip rap proposed to be placed in the stream channel associated with Crossings A or B? If
so, include the rip rap on the plan and profile views of these crossings, and ensure that the stream
and/or wetland impacts associated with rip rap is included and itemized clearly on the PCN and
plans.
Applicant Response: Please see attached.
4) Include a graphic (not text) scale on all plan sheets
Applicant Response: Please see attached.
5) Crossing A plans:
a. The PCN proposes 108 l.f. of stream impacts. However, the profile drawing shows the
footprint of the culvert and headwalls to be 111 l.f. Further, it the stream has any sinuosity the
actual stream length impacted by the culvert and headwall footprint would exceed the length of
the structure. Please re-evaluate all proposed impacts and update the PCN and plans accordingly
Applicant Response: Please see attached.
b. The plan view appears to show that the pipe is aligned such that the outlet occurs outside of
the existing channel. If the culvert pipe will be aligned such that the inlet and outlet are in -line
with the existing stream channel, please update the mapping to depict accurately. If not, please
update your plans to meet this requirement (Regional Condition 3.6.1)
Applicant Response: Please see attached.
C. The profile view twice shows "Existing `Intermittent' Stream Invert." Change to "Existing
`Perennial' Stream Invert."
Applicant Response: Please see attached.
10
6) Crossing B plans:
a. Clearly show the center line of the intermittent stream on the plan view
Applicant Response: Please see attached.
b. Provide a profile view for this proposed crossing
Applicant Response: Please see attached.
7) Temporary impacts:
a. For the proposed temporary wetland impact, clarify that the wetland will be restored such
that the top 12" of wetland soil will be segregated and placed back as the top 12" of soil upon
restoration of this wetland area
Applicant Response: Please see attached.
b. Provide the proposed seed mix to be used in the restoration of temporary wetland and
stream impacts
Applicant Response: Please see attached.
8) Please note that responses to the items above (especially item 2) may prompt additional
information requests to allow full evaluation of the proposed project.
Applicant Response: The applicant acknowledges.
11
Sincerely,
Bradley S. Luckey, PWS
336.708.4997 (c)
336.310.4527 (o)
PO Box 128
Kernersville, NC 27285
BlockedBlockedwww.pilotenviro. com
bluckey@pilotenviro.com
-----Original Message --
From: Bailey, David E CIV USARMY CESAW (USA)
[mailto:David.E.Bailey2@usace.army.mil]
Sent: Tuesday, December 31, 2019 11:51 AM
To: Brad Luckey <bluckey@pilotenviro.com>; Greg Garrett <greg@shugartmanagement.com>
Cc: Homewood, Sue <sue.homewood(cr�,ncdenr.gov>
Subject: RE: Request for Additional Information: Meadow Valley s/d, High Point, Guilford Co.;
SAW-2018-02095
Hi Brad, and thanks for the question. As you point out, there are various NWP General and
Regional Conditions that address restoration of temporary impacts; 3 of which are cited below.
The information provided in the PCN did not allow me to confirm that these conditions would be
met (3.11 in particular), and it is within my discretion to request this information in order to
ensure that they are.
NWP General Conditions:
13. Removal of Temporary Fills. Temporary fills must be removed in their entirety and the
affected areas returned to pre -construction elevations. The affected areas must be revegetated, as
appropriate.
12
23(a). The activity must be designed and constructed to avoid and minimize adverse effects, both
temporary and permanent, to waters of the United States to the maximum extent practicable at
the project site (i.e., on site)
NWP 29 regional Conditions:
3.11 Restoration of Temporary Impacts to Stream Banks Upon completion of work involving
temporary stream bank impacts, stream banks are to be restored to pre -project grade and
contours or beneficial grade and contours if the original bank slope is steep and unstable. Natural
durable materials, native seed mixes, and native plants and shrubs are to be utilized in the
restoration.
Thanks again, and have a great 2020.
-Dave Bailey
David E. Bailey, PWS
Regulatory Project Manager
US Army Corps of Engineers
CE-SAW-RG-R
3331 Heritage Trade Drive, Suite 105
Wake Forest, North Carolina 27587
Phone: (919) 554-4884, Ext. 30.
Fax: (919) 562-0421
Email: David.E.Bailey2@usace.army.mil
13
We would appreciate your feedback on how we are performing our duties. Our automated
Customer Service Survey is located at:
BlockedBlockedhttp://corpsmapu.usace.army.mil/cm apex/f?p=136 * 0
Thank you for taking the time to visit this site and complete the survey.
-----Original Message --
From: Brad Luckey[mailto:bluckey@pilotenviro.com]
Sent: Monday, December 30, 2019 10:38 AM
To: Bailey, David E CIV USARMY CESAW (USA)<David.E.Bailey2@usace.army.mil>; Greg
Garrett <greg@shugartmanagement.com>
Cc: Homewood, Sue <sue.homewood(cr�,ncdenr.gov>
Subject: [Non-DoD Source] RE: Request for Additional Information: Meadow Valley s/d, High
Point, Guilford Co.; SAW-2018-02095
David -a little clarity please on request 7b. I am unfamiliar with the regulations that require
seeding mixes to be provided. I am familiar with temporary impact restoration requirements in
general condition 13 of NWP 12/29 and regional conditions 3.10 and 3.11. Please advise.
Thanks.
Sincerely,
Bradley S. Luckey, PWS
336.708.4997 (c)
336.310.4527 (o)
14
PO Box 128
Kernersville, NC 27285
BlockedBlockedwww.pilotenviro.com<BlockedBlockedBlockedhttp://www.pilotenviro.com/>
bluckey@pilotenviro.com<mailto:bluckey@pilotenviro.com>
From: Bailey, David E CIV USARMY CESAW (USA)
[mailto:David.E.Bailey2@usace.army.mil]
Sent: Friday, December 20, 2019 9:52 AM
To: Greg Garrett <greg@shugartmanagement.com>; Brad Luckey <bluckey@pilotenviro.com>
Cc: Homewood, Sue <sue.homewood(cr�,ncdenr.gov>
Subject: Request for Additional Information: Meadow Valley s/d, High Point, Guilford Co.;
SAW-2018-02095
Messrs. Garrett and Luckey,
Thank you for your PCN and attached information, dated and received 11/26/2019, for the above
referenced project. I have reviewed the information and need clarification before proceeding
with verifying the use of Nationwide Permit 29 (BlockedBlockedBlockedhttp://saw-
15
reg.usace.army.mil/NWP2017/2017NWP29.pdf). Please submit the requested information below
(via e-mail is fine) within 30 days of receipt of this Notification, otherwise we may deny
verification of the use of the Nationwide Permit or consider your application withdrawn and
close the file:
1) Please note that stream and wetland impacts for additional phases of the Meadow Valley
s/d were authorized via NWP 29 and 12 on 9/12/2007. However, based on evaluation of the
previously permitted plans, our site visit in 2018, and the most recent aerial photography, none of
the authorized impacts were constructed. Further, the NWP 29 and 12 verification dated
9/12/2007 has since expired. As such, the currently proposed stream and wetland impacts will be
evaluated as the entirety of proposed impacts for the Meadow Valley single and complete
project;
2) Provide a plan view of the lot layout and infrastructure (roads, utilities, stormwater, etc
for the entire proposed Meadow Valley s/d overlaid on a survey of the stream and wetland
delineation approved by the Corps. This plan is necessary to evaluate avoidance and
minimization measures and potential indirect impacts for the project;
3) Is rip rap proposed to be placed in the stream channel associated with Crossings A or B? If
so, include the rip rap on the plan and profile views of these crossings, and ensure that the stream
and/or wetland impacts associated with rip rap is included and itemized clearly on the PCN and
plans;
4) Include a graphic (not text) scale on all plan sheets;
5) Crossing A plans:
a. The PCN proposes 108 11. of stream impacts. However, the profile drawing shows the
footprint of the culvert and headwalls to be I I I l.f. Further, it the stream has any sinuosity the
actual stream length impacted by the culvert and headwall footprint would exceed the length of
the structure. Please re-evaluate all proposed impacts and update the PCN and plans accordingly;
16
b. The plan view appears to show that the pipe is aligned such that the outlet occurs outside of
the existing channel. If the culvert pipe will be aligned such that the inlet and outlet are in -line
with the existing stream channel, please update the mapping to depict accurately. If not, please
update your plans to meet this requirement (Regional Condition 3.6.1);
C. The profile view twice shows "Existing `Intermittent' Stream Invert." Change to "Existing
`Perennial' Stream Invert."
6) Crossing B plans:
a. Clearly show the center line of the intermittent stream on the plan view;
b. Provide a profile view for this proposed crossing;
7) Temporary impacts:
a. For the proposed temporary wetland impact, clarify that the wetland will be restored such
that the top 12" of wetland soil will be segregated and placed back as the top 12" of soil upon
restoration of this wetland area;
b. Provide the proposed seed mix to be used in the restoration of temporary wetland and
stream impacts;
8) Please note that responses to the items above (especially item 2) may prompt additional
information requests to allow full evaluation of the proposed project.
Please let me know if you have any questions.
17
-Dave Bailey
David E. Bailey, PWS
Regulatory Project Manager
US Army Corps of Engineers
CE-SAW-RG-R
3331 Heritage Trade Drive, Suite 105
Wake Forest, North Carolina 27587
Phone: (919) 554-4884, Ext. 30.
Fax: (919) 562-0421
Email: David.E.Bailey2@usace.army.mil<mailto:David.E.Bailey2@usace.army .mil>
18
We would appreciate your feedback on how we are performing our duties. Our automated
Customer Service Survey is located at:
BlockedBlockedBlockedhttp://corpsmapu.usace.anny.mil/cm_apex/f?p=136:4:0
Thank you for taking the time to visit this site and complete the survey.
19
NOTE
CLAYTON PROPERTIES
GROUP DOES NOT 1. WETLANDS AND STREAM VERIFIED BY PILOT
�o OWN, NOR HAS RIGHTS ENVIRONMENTAL INC. WITH USACE AND NCDEQ-DWR ON
TO BUY AT THIS TIME JULY 10, 2019. GREEN MOUNTIAN ENGINEERING, PLLC.
C4�ry F/ FIELD LOCATED THE VERIFIED WETLAND AND STREAM
FLAGS PLACED BY PILOT ENVIRONMENTAL INC.
2. THIS DEVELOPMENT HAS BEEN ACCEPTED BY THE CITY
OF HIGH POINT AS A HIGH DENSITY STORMWATER
T" TURNAROUND — • ' \ PROJECT, WITH WET DETENTION PONDS AS STORMWATER
MANAGEMENT DEVICES FOR RANDLEMAN LAKE BUFFER
• .;' '' 115 LF CULVERT IMPACT RULES.
' 30 LF RIP RAP IMPACT, TO BE
3. STORMWATER PONDS "A" & "B" PERMITTED AND
KEYED INTO BED AND BANK.
« CONSTRUCTED IN 2007.
• • 30 LF STORM PIPE CROSSING
/ • • 'a TEMPORARY IMPACTS
85 LF COFFER DAM IMPACTS
a +� V° ° POND "B"
Oo �� 1
• ;: o p o s oOD
p s
p
PUB._=._
iT DEVELOPER:
CLAY TON PROPERTIES GROUP INC
(dba:SHUGART HOMES)
LIFT STATION FORCEMAIN �` �221 JONESTOWN ROAD
CONNECTS TO EXISTING I j��� WINSTON-SALEM, NC 27104
! CONTACT: GREG GARRETT
SEWER IN BASSWOOD _
61 r I'I PH: 336.765.9661
7, AVE AND FLOWS NORTH01
-
�� GREEN MOUNTAIN
ENGINEERING, PLLC
POND "A" � � !-
° 7A WENDY CT
• ` �` ��.
a\ ��• ��~ \ � t ,-�� � GREENSBORO, NC 27409
voTel: 336 294 9394
\ `d\`1 IOCERTIFICATE N0. P 0826
CAR ww. .greenmountame gineers.co m�
9
,, STREAM / WETLAND
Go , IMPACT MAP
y/,�'�1 0' 100' 200' 400'
sF,,ticINE�,,,,��.�� MEADOW VALLEY
obb ,
SCALE: '=200' SUBDIVISION