20010745 Ver 1_COMPLETE FILE_20010518

OW A T ?RpG
O `C
Michael F: Easley
Governor
William G. Ross, Jr., Secretary
Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Kerr T. Stevens
Division of Water Quality
June 27, 2001
DW Q# 01-0745
John Nelley, Jr. Granville County
NWI. XX., L.P.
Fourty-Four Business Center
782 Melrose Avenue
Nashville, TN, 37211
APPROVAL of 401 Water (duality Certification and Neuse River Buffer Rules with Additional Condition
Dear Mr. Nelley:
You have our approval, in accordance with the attached conditions, to place fill in 0.013 acre of wetlands and 142 linear feet of
streams and temporary impacts to 0.207 acre of wetlands in order to construct a road crossing and sewerline at the Butner Business Park
in Granville County, as described in your application received by the Division of Water Quality on May 18, 2001. After reviewing your
application, we have determined that this fill is covered by General Water Quality Certification Numbers 3288 and 3287. This Certification
allows you to use Nationwide Permit Numbers 12 and 39 when issued by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. This approval is also valid
for the Neuse River Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 26 .0233). In addition, you should get any other federal, state or local permits before you go
ahead with your project including (but not limited to) Sediment and Erosion Control, Non-Discharge and Water Supply Watershed
regulations. Also this approval will expire when the accompanying 404 permit expires unless otherwise specified in the General
Certification.
This approval is only valid for the purpose and design that you described in your application. If you change your project, you
must notify us and you may be required to send us a new application for a new certification. If the property is sold, the new owner must
be given a copy of the Certificatioh.and approval letter and is thereby responsible for complying with All conditions. If total wetland fills for
this project (now or in the future)cceed one acre, compensatory mitigation may be required as described in 15A NCAC 2H.0506 (h).
For this approval to be valid, you must follow the conditions listed in the attached certification and the'additional-conditions listed below:
An additional condition is that stormwater shall be directed to diffuse flow at non-erosive velocities through the protected stream
buffers.
If you do not accept any of the conditions of this certification, you may ask for an adjudicatory hearing. You must act within 60
days of the date that you receive this letter. To ask for a hearing, send a written petition conforming to Chapter 1508 of the North
Carolina General Statutes to the Office of Administrative Hearings, P.O. Box 27447, Raleigh, N.C. 27611-7447. This certification and its
conditions are final and binding unless you ask for a hearing.
This letter completes the review of the Division of Water Quality under Section 401 of the Clean Water Act. If you have any
questions, please telephone John Dorney at 919-733-9646.
Attachments
i cerely
r . teve s
cc: Corps of Engineers Raleigh Field Office
Raleigh DWQ Regional Office
Central Files
File Copy
Kevin Martin, 11010 Raven Ridge Road, Raleigh, NC, 27614
010745
North Carolina Division of Water Quality, 401 Wetlands Certification Unit,
1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1650 (Mailing Address)
2321 Crabtree Blvd., Raleigh, NC 27604-2260 (Location)
-n "I .' .O /..1.......\ (11., 10 .- /....,\ ..... ........ __-1-_'.._.'__A_
O?OFWAT?9pG
0 <
CID
Michael F. Easley
Governor
William G. Ross, Jr., Secretary
Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Kerr T. Stevens
of Water Quality
June 1, 2001
Memorandum To:
From
John Dorney
Todd St. John
Subject
Butner Business PArk
Granville County
DWQ# 010745

The wet pond is fine. The problem is that the outlet of the wet pond does not indicate that diffuse flow will be
achieved which is a condition of the NBR Approval...
That aside, I can suggest an approach that I predict will provide us with the desired results. It think we should
require as a condition of an approval that the professional that designed the stormwater drainage certify and seal that all
new discharges are outside the buffer and that all of the discharges will be diffuse and will not re-concentrate throughout
the entire buffer. Otherwise they must provide plans and calculations to prove to the satisfaction of this Office that
compliance with the Buffer Rules has been met. Here's how:
1. Before any buffer impacts approved herein are conducted, you shall submit stormwater plans that contain the
following statement signed and sealed by an appropriate North Carolina Professional:
I, [Name], certify that based on the design provided herein that all stormwater runoff from this site (as shown) that
originates outside the 50 foot riparian buffer or the buffered stream will discharge outside the 50 foot riparian buffer,
will flow in a diffuse manner through the entire buffer, and will not re-concentrate before discharging into the stream.
Or we can do something simpler that would provide us an opportunity to review the plans without having to approve them.
If we disagree with the design we can simply write them a letter that claims that their plan does not appear to comply with
the Rules or the approval. I would have time to do such an informal review and flag it if I see problems:
2. An additional condition is that stormwater shall be directed to flow in a diffuse manner at non-erosive velocities
through the entire protected stream buffers without re-concentrating. Additionally, a stormwater management plan for
this project shall be provided to this Office before any of the impacts approved herein are conducted. The plan shall
specify all stormwater discharge points, plan details, and calculations to indicate that diffuse flow through the
protected buffers as described above will be achieved.
North Carolina Division of Water Quality, 401 Wetlands Certification Unit,
1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1650 (Mailing Address)
2321 Crabtree Blvd., Raleigh, NC 27604-2260 (Location)
919-733-1786 (phone), 919-733-6893 (fax), http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands/
W A T ?Rp?
Michael F. Easley
Governor
William G. Ross, Jr., Secretary
Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Kerr T. Stevens
Division of Water Quality
May 29, 2001 _
Memorandum To. John Dorney ?A
From: Todd St. John
Subject: Butner Business P rk
Granville County U, cM
DWQ# 010745
rte' CP/1
I haver come up with some all inclusive lingo for a B fer Rule stormwater condition. I'd really?',n?
hate to review all those plans. Maybe we should just consider having them submit a copy of the plan. Y
If we approve the plans and it doesn't work they'll say, "but you approved it!" Also, if they submit a
copy and and we see any violations we can flag them at that point...
An additional condition is that the stormwater management plan for this project shall be provided to this Office. The plan
shall specify all stormwater discharge points, plan details, and calculations to indicate that diffuse flow through the
protected buffers can be achieved.,-The
V? _
6k?
Z0d
_?' dr.? IoYs l

/WY-

Ca,4X4't ( k--
q J'a k
tv? Wk-?u PJ0
15s ? ct
err-
ff ; ?I AAJ (010 Vick ?,Wwz, 40
40
C;
Stu
North Carolina Division of Water Quality, 401 Wetlands Certification Unit,
1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1650 (Mailing Address)
2321 Crabtree Blvd., Raleigh, NC 27604-2260 (Location)
919-733-1786 (phone), 919-733-6893 (fax), http://h2o.onr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands/

b/r1o^
poJ
a amid
w4m
TIE JOHN R. McADAMS COMPANY, INC.
LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL
To: Todd St. John
Date: May 4, 2001
Division of Water Quality
Environmental Sciences Branch
4401 Reedy Creek Rd. FEDERAL EXPRESS
Raleigh, North Carolina 27607
Re: Butner Business Park Water Quality Pond #1 Job Nkol WIGS 98000
_A
I am sending you the following item(s):
COPIES DATE NO. DESCRIPTION
3 3 Water Quality Pond Design Calculations
3 3 Accompanying Watershed Maps
3 3 Water Quality Pond Plans and Details

These are transmitted as checked below:
? As requested ? For your use
® For approval ?
? For review and comment ? Wo
Remarks: J d G fwrl? I
64
Copy to: Tim Michael Signed:
?-Tooh? E. SC)iiz'o r) yZ
FOR INTERNAL USE ONLY
® Copy Letter of Transmittal Only to File
? Copy Entire Document to File
w cu"
CIVIL ENGINEERING • LAND PLANNING • SURVEYING
PO Box 14005 • Research Triangle Park, NC 27709 • [phone] • fax[phone]
www.johnrmcadams.com
•
•
•
•

•
•
BUTNER BUSINESS PARK.
•
•
•
• DUTCHVILLE TOWNSH-Mo NORTH CAROLINA
•

•
•
• DESIGN CALCULATIONS
• FOR WATER QUALITY POND
•

•
•
WKS-98000.
May 4, 2001

•

• J. E. SCHRUM, E.I.
•
•
•

nffi JOHN R. MCADAM COWNY l K.

• ,
. CIVIL ENGINEERING • LAND PLA.NNI'NG r SURVEYING

I
1
I

r
?---- THE JOHN R. McADAMS COMPANY, INC.
BUTNER BUSINESS PARK
DUTCHVILLE TOWNSHIP, NORTH CAROLINA
DESIGN CALCULATIONS
FOR WATER QUALITY POND
WKS 98000
J.E. SCHRUM, E.I.
%%'%jlllll)rp r/,
e?
May 4, 2001
495
4
)1?? w
CIVIL ENGINEERING • LAND PLANNING • SURVEYING
PO Box 14005 • Research Triangle Park. NC 27709 • [phone] • fax[phone]
www.lohnrmcadams.com
Butner Business Park
Pond #1
Water Quality Pond Design
General Description of the Site and Design Criteria
Located just west of and adjacent to Gate Two Road (SR 1103) and just north of
Interstate 85, Butner Business Park is a proposed 350-acre commercial/mixed used
development in Dutchville Township, North Carolina. The proposed development
consists of shopping centers, warehouses and office buildings along with associated
streets and public utilities. This report contains the water quality pond calculations for
the first phase of the proposed Butner Business Park. This phase is located between Gate
Two Road and the unnamed stream, which divides the property.
The site is located within the Falls Lake WS-IV-GW Watershed Protection Area. Per
Granville County Watershed Protection rules, any development over 30% impervious
requires stormwater Best Management Practices (BMP's) to mitigate water quality
impacts due to development. For this reason a water quality pond has been designed to
standards as set forth in Stormwater Best Management Practices, NCDENR, April 1999.
The pond is designed to capture the runoff from the first inch of rainfall for a drainage
basin encompassing the entire phase 1 area of Butner Business Park. The runoff is to be
released to the adjacent unnamed stream over a period of two to five days. The pond is
designed to provide adequate permanent pool surface area to facilitate the removal of
85% of the storm water total suspended solids, in the one-inch rainfall event.
The pond has been routed to safely pass the runoff from the 100-year storm event. The
pond has been designed such that the entire flow from the 100-year storm event passes
through the primary spillway.
Calculation Methodology
• On-site topography is from USGS 7.5 minute quad maps, with interpolation of the
two-foot contour using Softdesk 8.0.
• Rainfall Data for the region is from USWB Technical Paper No. 40 and NOAA
HYDRO-35.
• The time of concentration (Tc) of the watershed was determined using the SCS
Segmental Approach (SCS TR-55, 1986). This equation was modeled using Penn
State Urban Hydrology Model (Pennsylvania State University Civil Engineering
Department, November 1989).
• Using Granville County Soil Survey, the site soils are primarily of Hydrologic
Soil Group `C'. Appropriate SCS CN's were selected based upon the soil group.
• The runoff amount for the first 1.0-inch of rainfall was calculated using the SCS
Curve Number method and the application of Directly Connected Impervious
Areas (DCIAs). The use of DCIAs alleviates the shortcomings of the SCS CN
method when applied to impervious sites and low rainfall depths. A volume of
greater than that calculated is provided in the proposed pond.
• Water quality calculations were performed in accordance with the NC Stormwater
Best Management Practices (NC DENR, April 1999). The normal pool surface
area of the pond was sized, using the required SA/DA ratio charts.
• The pond is designed to capture the runoff from the first inch of rainfall. The
pond's outlet system is designed to discharge this volume over a period of two to
five days.
• Flowrates and routing were computed using HEC-HMS version 2.1.1. The pond
was routed using the elevation-area-outflow method to relate elevation to storage
and outflow. The surface area verses elevation was plotted using a scatter plot,
and a third-order polynomial equation was fit to this data using Microsoft Excel
2000. This equation was then used in the rating curve spreadsheet to calculate
surface area verses elevation in 0.25 ft increments. The resulting equation is
included in the accompanying design calculations. The resulting rating curve was
then entered into a reservoir element in HEC-HMS and was routed in the 10- and
100-year storm events.
• A velocity outlet dissipater has been sized below the outfall of the 36" outlet
structure. This velocity dissipater was sized using the NYDOT Method and the
outflow from the pond in the 10-year storm event.
SUMMARY OF RESULTS.xls
WKS 98000
SUMMARY OF RESULTS FOR WATER QUALITY/DETENTION POND
==> WATER QUALITY ASPECTS
SA REQUIRED = 35908 sf
SA PROVIDED = 40971 sf
I" R/O STORAGE REQ'D = 74944 cf
I" R/O STORAGE PROVIDED = 96478 cf
AVG. NORMAL POOL DEPTH = 4.49 ft
TIME FOR I" R/O STORAGE DRAWDOWN = 2.9 days
==> GENERAL POND CHARACTER/ST/CS
Qi„ IN = 189.61 cfs
Q,,, OUT = 95.46 cfs
Q,,,,, IN = 276.91 cfs
Q,)„OUT= 102.72 cfs
WSEL,o = 351.64 ft
WSEL,,, = 352.92 ft
TOP OF BERM = 354.0 ft
FREEBOARDi„a= 1.08 ft
J.E SCHRUM, E.I.
5/4/01
Project No. DWQ
(to be provided by DWQ)
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY - 401 WET DETENTION BASIN WORKSHEET
DWQ Stormwater Management Plan Review:
A complete stormwater management plan submittal includes a wet detention basin worksheet for each basin,
design calculations, plans and specifications showing all basin and outlet structure details, and a fully executed
operation and maintenance agreement. An incomplete submittal package will result in a request for additional
information and will substantially delay final review and approval of the project.
1. PROJECT INFORMATION (please complete the following information):
Project Name: Butner Business Park
Contact Person: John Nelley Phone Number [phone]
For projects with multiple basins, specify which basin this worksheet applies to: N/A
Basin Bottom Elevation
Permanent Pool Elevation
Temporary Pool Elevation
Permanent Pool Surface Area
Drainage Area
Impervious Area
Permanent Pool Volume
Temporary Pool Volume
Forebay Volume
SA/DA Used
Diameter of Orifice
342.00 ft.
348.00 ft.
349.90 it.
40971 sq. ft.
39.13 ac.
27.39 ac.
145271 cu. ft.
96478 cu. ft.
30270 cu. ft.
2.40%
14" Diameter in.
II. REQUIRED ITEMS CHECKLIST
(average elevation of the floor of the basin)
(elevation of the orifice invert out)
(elevation of the outlet structure invert in)
(water surface area at permanent pool elevation)
(on-site and off-site drainage to the basin)
(on-site and off-site drainage to the basin)
(combined volume of main basin and forebay)
(volume detained on top of the permanent pool)
(surface area to drainage area ratio)
(draw down orifice diameter)
The following checklist outlines design requirements per the Stormwater Best Management Practices manual
(N.C. Department of Environment, Health and Natural Resources, November, 1995) and Administrative Code
Section: 15 A NCAC 2H .1008. Initial in the space provided to indicate the following design requirements have
been met and supporting documentation is attached. If a requirement has not been met, attach tin explanation
q f u,hy.
Aanlicants Initials
JES
JES
JES
JES
JES
JES
JES
JES
JES
JES
JES
JES
JES
JES
JES
JES
The temporary pool controls runoff from the 1-inch storm event.
The basin length to width ratio is greater than 3:1.
The basin side slopes are no steeper than 3:1.
A submerged and vegetated perimeter shelf at less than 6:1 is provided
Vegetation to the permanent pool elevation is specified.
An emergency drain is provided to drain the basin.
The permanent pool depth is between 3 and 6 feet (required minimum of 3 feet).
The temporary pool draws down in 2 to 5 days.
The forebay volume is approximately equal to 20% of the total basin volume.
Sediment storage is provided in the permanent pool.
Access is provided for maintenance.
A minimum 30-foot vegetative filter is provided at the outlet
A site specific operation and maintenance (O&M) plan is provided.
A vegetative management/mowing schedule is provided in the O&M plan
Semi-annual inspections are specified in the O&M plan.
A debris check is specified in the O&M plan to be performed after every storm event.
A specific sediment clean-out benchmark is listed (elevations or depth) in O&M plan.
A responsible party is designated in the O&M plan.
FORM SWG100 09/97 PAGE 1 OF 1
Required Items Checklist Omission Explanation:
• Vegetation to permanent pool elevations is specified:
Vegetation to be specified by qualified landscape architect in order to
select vegetation that is appropriate for the geographic region and land use
type.
• A minimum 30 foot vegetative filter is provided at outlet:
Pond outlets across existing sanitary sewer easement and into a protected
Neuse River Basin riparian buffer.
INPUT DATA
•
•
u.i
. !V
'n
C?
x
U
W
a
W
J
Q
^l
x
L?..
O
00
w a
w 3
H
.a
W
a
11
F"
A
F
a
s ? 3
OOEO:?;
z:ziz:
i
7 j E^:
i•xioc
p C; xi
O :K
b 00 ; c-
d
1
r??C•°i
5 E, 5:-ri
trtIlE
L
d V
O
C1
L
tU t q
o a; v
r' .6 ?
N _
42
F„ c
G A
c
d d ^;O:^ Y:CD ;O O1?'n
I' V 00;`7;00 E,D ;'n:O 7j1??00;O
0 5 of - i-€{`?i:r :•7 4tv :?0,;oo
L
H
to
.....
.......... ....: ..........t.....,....;........., ...........
L
Zo y 4 : ,
to
I
A
E v
7
d?'n:N;xFY:N;O1x:x;N:'n d
C OOH^!--•:NN?NM:Y:Y ?
;
00 C,
[.
GtO;tA OiO;N Mt?Oi.NEN
d LCN O; Y;xiCD ;0 O:,C:r M
o '
t
?x r C:-r:rn ;O:C C
Y L?T ^;rr:N:Y;N ^iri?cr
c) o
;tr,
N

'nrEN:'n;O,;N
d x:00 Y: Y:: xi N
• ? =?vi 'n:Y :N: CiC:OiC
Vc q 2? ?G?YtO!Oj nIIIjIIIjE^ Yirq 'n
°' o o: of o? c
..5i o
EE N
E E E
A O: tfNM N N
i 1
N
w
W o
N
in
U
cn
u.i
Q
2
fr
D
9
U
W
J
Q
X
Q
L
C
O
? O
O
W ?
ti k
f
I
V
?.J
72 : :
d`C Ni7;G" O'?O-!
C ?O;O!Oi0 0;010;-
" i ? 3 ?

c....,.....' ,....
ILI
N,
E
r i,.•,ixE-rim
E '
.
y"?4x:-:Oir'
N'.r
t : f t
00
•t' : `O:OiOlp:O
N
w
0
N
BUTNER BUSINESS PARK SOILS.xls
SOIL CLASSIFICATION
WKS 98000
J.E. SCHRUM, E.I.
5/2/01
SYMBOL NAME .? HYDROLOGIC SOIL
:,. GROUP
CrB Creedmoor C
PcA Picture Loam C
ON-SITE SOILS ARE PRIMARILY HSG'C'
USE HYDROLOGIC SOIL GROUP C
REFERENCES:
SOIL SURVEY, GRANVILLE COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT
OF AGRICULTURE SOIL CONSERVATION SERVICE (IN COOPERATION WITH NORTH
CAROLINA AGRICULTURE EXPERIMENT SECTION)
SCS TR55, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE SOIL CONSERVATION
SERVICE, 1986
WATER QUALITY DESIGN CALCULATIONS
BUTNER BUSINESS PARK SIPHON EL.XLS POND 1
WKS 98000
Water Quality Pond Desiqn Sheet

Contour
(feet)

Stage
(feet)
Contour
Area
SF Average
Contour
Area
SF Incremental
Contour
Volume
(CF) Accumulated
Contour
Volume
(CF)

348.0 0.0 40971
350.0 2.0 62273 51622 103244 103244
352.0 4.0 74946 68610 137219 240463
354.0 6.0 89653 82300 164599 405062
Storage vs. Stage
450000
400000
350000
LL 300000
U
250000
m
M, 200000
0
N 150000
100000
50000
0
y = 43484x1 1416
R2 = 0.9998
0.0 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0
Stage (feet)
Ks= 43484
b = 1.2416
6.0 7.0
J.E. SCHRUM, E.I.
5/3/01
Page 1
BUTNER BUSINESS PARK SIPHON EL.XLS POND 1 J.E. SCHRUM, E.I.
WKS 98000 5/3/01
Calculation of Runoff Volume required for storage
The runoff to the pond for the 1" storm detention requirement is calculated using the SCS curve
number method. Impervious areas that directly enter the pond are counted as Directly Connected
Impervious Areas (DCIAs). No infiltration calculation will be provided for these areas. Areas
not directly connected will be accounted for in a composite curve number.
From SCS Soils Survey map, predominant hydrologic soil type = D
Using basic SCS runoff methodology, with no adjustments made
to initial abstractions (0.2*S and 0.8*S).
Impervious Area, directly connected (DCIA) = 25.78 acres
@CN= 98
Other areas draining to pond (not DCIA) = 11.05 acres
@CN= 74
Runoff from DCIAs =_>
Precipitation amount = 1.0 inches
S = 0.204 inches (calculated)
Q* = 0.791 inches (calculated)
Runoff volume = 74014 CF
Runoff from non-connected areas =_>
Precipitation amount = 1.0 inches
S = 3.514 inches (calculated)
Q* = 0.023 inches (calculated)
Runoff volume = 930 CF
Therefore, total runoff from precipitation in question = 74944 CF
This amount of runoff must be stored in the pond above normal pool elevation,
and be released in a period of two (2) to five (5) days, by an inverted PVC
siphon, the invert end of which is set at permanent pool elevation.
Page 2

BUTNER BUSINESS PARK SIPHON EL.XLS POND 1 J.E. SCHRUM, E.I.
WKS 98000 5/4/01
Calculation of depth required for runoff storage pool (above normal pool)
Normal pool depth (above invert) = 0.00 feet
Storage provided at permanent pool depth = 0 CF (calculated)
Total storage required for normal + storage pool = 74944 CF
Stage (above invert) associated with this storage = 1.55 feet
Therefore, depth required above normal pool for storm storage = 1.55 feet
18.60 inches
Therefore set crest of principal spillway at stage = 1.90 feet
and EL = 349.90 feet
At principal spillway crest, storm pool storage provided = 96478 CF
Page 3

Water Quality Pond Check.Xl,S
Below NWSF,
WKS 98000
Stage-Storage Function
Project Name: BUINER BUSINESS PARK
Designer: I.E. Schrum. E.I.
Job Number: WKS 98000
Date: 5/3/01
STAGE-S'T'ORAGE FU NCTION FOR DETERMINA'T'ION OF
AVERAGE DEPT I I. AVERAGE, DEPTH = Z./b
Z-. = MAX. DEPTH
h = EXPONENT OF STAGE-STORAGE FUN CTION

Average Incremental Accumulated Estimated
Contour Contour Contour Contour Stage
Contour Stage Area Area Volume Volume w/ S-S Fxn
(feet) (feet) (SF) (SF) (CF) (CF) (feet)

342.0 0.013789 _
344.0 _2.0 20187 16988 33976 33976 2.02
346.0 _ 4.0 26958 23573 47145 81121 3.88
348.0 6.0 40971 33965 67929 149050 6.12
Storage vs. Stage
160000
140000
120000
U 100000
rn 80000
60000
40000
20000
0
0.0 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 6.0 7.0
Stage (feet)
Ks= 13256
b = 1.3362
I OF I
.1. F. SCIIRUM. F.1.
5/3/01
•
•
Water Quality Pond Check.XES
Forebay I
WKS 98000
Stage-Storai ze Function
Project Name: 13UI-NFR BUSINESS PARK
Designer: J.I. Schrum, E.I.
Job Number: WKS 98000
Date: 511101

Average Incremental Accumulated Estimated
C ontour Contour Contour Contour Stage
Contour Stage Area Area Volume Volume vv/ S-S Fxn
(feet) (feet) (SF) (SF) (CF) (CF) (feet)

342.0 0.0 1587
344.0 2.0 3670 2629 5257 5257 _ 2.03
v
346.0 4.0 ? 3.86
?--5927 -^- 4799 9597 14854
348.0 6.0 10615 8271 16542 31396 6.14
Storage vs. Stage
35000
30000
25000
LL
V 20000
N
m
0 15000
in
10000
5000
0
0.0 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 6.0 7.0
Stage (feet)
Ks = 1682.4
b = 1.6129
IOF I
J.G. SCHRUM. E.I.
5/1/01
Water Quality Pond Check.XLS J.1. SCHRUM, F..1.
Volume Check 5i3/01
WKS 98000
BUTNER BUSINESS PARK WATER QUALITY POND
Per NCDENR ':Stornovater Best Management Practices the forebay volume should equal about 20° o of the total
basin volume.
A. Water Qualih, Pond - Below Normal Pool
NWSF. = 348
Stage - Storage Function
Ks= 13256
b 1.3362
%o 343
Volume -- 145271 11'
B. Forebav Volume
Forebav 1: Volume
Stage - Storage Function
Ks = 1682.4
b= 1.6129
Lo = 342
Volume = 30270 fl'
% Forebav = 210o OK 'rhe April, 1999 NCDENR Stormwater BNV Manual suggest between
10 - 200 o for the required forebay volume.

Impervious Area 25.78 acres
Drainage Area = 36.83 acres
°o ImperviouS 70°0
Average Depth -° l b
z 6 feet
b 1.3362
Average Depth 4.49 It.
From NCDENR Table 1. t : Su,face : lrea to Drainage.-lrea Ratio F'or Permanent Pool .Sizing For 859o PothNant
Remora! Efficiency in the Piedmont
Impervious CoverPetananent Pool Depth (feet);
4.0 5.0
70 2.40:: k,.2.07
At Depth 4.49 2.24
Required Area 0.824 acres
35908 sq.tt.
Area Provided 40971 sc.ft. OK
WQ POND SIPHON.XLS
WQ POND
W KS 98000
Inverted Siphon Design Sheet
D siphon =
No. siphons =
Ks =
b=
Cd siphon =
Siphon Invert
=
Volume @ Normal Pool =
Basin Invert
=
4 inches
1
43484
1.2416
0.60
348.00 feet
0 CF
348.00 feet
WSEL
feet Vol. Stored
(cf Siphon Flow
cfs) Avg. Flow
cfs) Incr. Vol.
cf Incr. Time
sec
349.900 96478 0.552
349.740 86480 0.526 0.539 9999 18542
349.579 76702 0.499 0.512 9778 19083
349.419 67161 0.470 0.484 9541 19710
349.259 57877 0.438 0.454 9284 20450
349.099 48875 0.405 0.422 9002 21345
348.938 40186 0.369 0.387 8689 22466
348.778 31849 0.328 0.348 8337 23935
348.618 23919 0.282 0.305 7929 26004
348.458 16476 0.226 0.254 7443 29297
348.297 9648 0.145 0.186 6828 36801
Drawdown Time = 2.75 days
By comparison, if calculated by the average head over the orifice (assuming
average head is half the total depth), the result would be:
Average driving head on orifice = 0.788 feet
Orifice composite loss coefficient = 0.600
X-Sectional area of 1 - 4" inverted siphon = 0.087 ft2
Q = 0.3731 cfs
Drawdown Time = Volume / Flowrate / 86400 (sec/day)
Drawdown Time = 2.99 da s
J. E. SCHRUM, E.I.
5/4/01
Conclusion : Use 1 - 4" Diameter PVC Inverted Siphon to drawdown the accumulated
volume from the 1.0 " storm runoff, with a required time of about 2.9 days.
HYDROLOGY AND POND ROUTING DESIGN
CALCULATIONS
WQ POND DESIGN FLOWS.xIs
POST-DEVELOPMENT (TO POND)
WKS 98000
Small Watershed Method Hydroaranh Generation
(Rf.* "Elements of Urban Stormwater Design, H. R. Malcom, PE)
Post-Development to Pond Drainage Area Description =_>
Total Drainage Area =
Impervious area = 25.78 AC and CN =
Open / Grassy / Landscaped Area = 11.05 AC and CN =
Wooded Area = 0.00 AC and CN =
Other undescribed area = 0.00 AC and CN =
98.0
74.0
70.0
0.0
Total DA = 36.83 AC and CN = 90.8
0.0575 sq miles
Design Storm Description / Watershed Sensitivity =_>
J. E. SCHRUM, E.I.
5/4/01
Time of Concentration = 13.1 minutes
SCS Lag = 7.86 minutes
WQ POND DESIGN FLOWS.xIs
POST Tc
WKS 98000
Time of Concentration Information:
Segment 1
Length =
Height =
Slope =
Manning's 'n' _
P (2-year, 6-hour) _
Segment 4: Channel Flow
Length =
Height =
Slope =
Channel Area =
Wetted Perimeter =
Manning's'n' _
Overland Flow
50 ft
0.5 ft
0.01 ft/ft
0.240 DENSE GASSES
3.6 inches
1112 ft
10 ft
0.0090 ft/ft
J.E. SCHRUM, E.I.
5/1/01
Segment 2: Concentrated Flow
Length = 90 ft
Height = 1 ft
Slope = 0.011 ft/ft
UNPAVED
7.07 sf (18" RCP, Flowing Full)
9.42 ft
0.013 (RCP)
Time of Concentration = 13.1 minutes
Water Quality Pond Check.XI,S
Above NWSE
WKS 98000
Stale-Area Function
Project Name: BUTNER BUSINESS PARK
Designer: J.E.. Schrum, G.I.
Job Number: WKS 98000
Date: 5/2/01
Contour
Contour Stage Area
(feet) (feet) (SF)
348.0 OA 40971
350.0 2.0 62273
352.0 4.0 74946
354.0 6.0 89653
Storage vs. Area
100000
90000
80000
70000
cLL
? 60000
rn 50000
m
40000
rn
30000
20000
10000
0
Y = 222.15x3 -241 1.5X2 + 14585x + 40971
RZ = 1
0.0 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 6.0 7.0
Stage (feet)
SA = 222.15z3 - 411.5 \2 1 14585z+ 40971
NOTF: STAGE AREA FUNCTION IS APPLIED TO POND RATING CURVE FOR
ROUTING IN HEC-HMS v 2. 1.1 USING TFIF ELEVA"1'ION-Al FEA-OUTFLOW ME H 101)
J.G. SCHRUM, E.I.
5/2/01
I OF I
Riser-Barrel Rating Curve - WQ Pond.xls WATER QUALITY POND 13?SCI IRUM. I' I.
Riser - Barrel 5/4/01
C M D-01000
Ratinfl Curve Calculation
Riser/Barrel Scenario =>
Constant'FW Elevation =
Riser Diameter =
Barrel Diameter =
Riser Crest Elevation =
Barrel Invert In Elevation =
Barrel Manning's n =
Barrel Length =
Number of Identical Barrels =
Cw =
Cd =
Ke =
Emergency Spillwgv Scenario =>
342.00 feet
72 inches
36 inches
349.90 teet
34200 feet
0.013
80 feet
1
3.0 Weir coctlicient
0.59 Coeflicient of Discharge
L5 Aggregate Loss Coefficient
Length = 0.0 ft.
Crest Elevation = 352.0 It.
Cw = 3.0 Weir coefficient
Stage-Area Function => SA = 222.15z' - 2411 5x2 + 14585z + 40971
Zo = 348
Basin
WSEL
(feet) Riser as
Orifice
(cfs) Riser as
Weir
(cfs) Ilarrel TW
Conditions
(cfs) Barrel HW
Conditions
(cfs) Emergency
Spillway
(cfs) Basin
Outflow
(cfs) Barrel
Action Surface Area

(ft2) (acre)
348.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 00 FRICTION 40971 0.941
34825 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 FRICTION 44170 1,021
348.50 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 FRICTION 47688 1,095
348.75 0,00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 FRICTION 50647 1.163
349.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 FRICTION 53367 1.225
349.25 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 00 FRICTION 55868 1.283
349.50 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 FRICTION 58172 1.335
349.75 0.00 0.00 0 00 0.00 0.00 0.00 FRICTION 60300 1.384
350.00 42.33 1.79 111.07 85.33 000 1.79 ORIFICE: 62272 1-430
350.25 7920 11,71 11279 86.95 0,00 11.71 ORIFICE: 64109 1.472
350.50 103.70 26.28 114.49 88.55 0.00 2628 ORIFICE: 65833 1.511
350.75 12342 44.32 116.16 90.11 0.00 44.32 ORIFICE 67463 1549
351.00 140.41 65.24 117.81 91.66 0.00 65.24 ORIFICE 69021 1.584
351.25 155.54 8870 11943 93.17 0.00 88.70 ORIFICE: 70527 1.619
351.50 169.34 114.45 121.04 94.66 0.00 94.66 ORIFICE: 72002 1,653
35175 182.08 14229 12262 96.13 0.00 96.13 ORIFICE: 73468 1,687
35200 194.00 172.09 1'_4.18 97.57 0.00 97.57 ORIFICE 74945 1.720
352 25 205 2 203.7'_ 125.72 99.00 0.00 99.00 ORIFICE; 76453 1.755
352.50 215.86 237.07 127.25 100.40 0.00 100.40 ORIFICE: 78014 1791
352.75 226.00 272.08 128.75 101.79 000 101.79 0111FIC'E 79649 1828
353.00 235]0 308.65 130.24 103.15 0.00 103.15 ORIFICE; 81377 1 868
353 25 245.02 34673 131.71 104.50 0.00 10450 ORIFICE 83221 1 910
353.50 25400 386.26 133.17 105.83 0.00 105.83 ORIFICE. 85201 1956
353 75 2(,267 427 18 134 61 107 15 0 00 107.1 5 ORIFICE 87337 2.005
354.00 271 .07 469 16 136.03 108.45 0.00 108 45 0RIIA0: 89651 2058
IOI'I
HEC-HMS Project: WKS-98000 Basin Model:
To WQ Pond 1
Reservoir-1
HMS " Summary of Results for Reservoir-1
Project VKS-98000 Run Name 10-Year Post
Start of Run 04May01 1200 Basin Model Post-Development
End of Run 05May01 1200 Met. Model 10-Year RDU
Execution Time 04May01 0851 Control Specs 1-minute dT
Computed Results
Peak Inflow 178.44 (cfs) Date/Time of Peak Inflow 05 May 01 0009
Peak Outflow 95.460 (cfs) Date/Time of Peak Outflow 05 May 01 0020
Total Inflow 4.27 (in) Peak Storage 4.9690 (in)
Total Outflow 3.48 (in) Peak Elevation 351.64 (in)

HMS * Summary of Results for Reservoir-1
Project WXS-98000 Run Name 100-Year Post
Start of Run 04May01 1200 Basin Model Post-Development
End of Run 05May01 1200 Met. Model 100-Year RDU
Execution Time 04May01 0852 Control Specs 1-minute dT
Computed Results
Peak Inflow 260. 59 (cfs) Date/Time of Peak Inflow OS May 01 0009
Peak Outflow 102. 72 (cfs) Date/Time of Peak Outflow 05 May 01 0025
Total Inflow 6.89 (in) Peak Storage 7.2318 (in)
Total Outflow 6.09 (in) Peak Elevation 352.92 (in)
POND STRUCTURE DESIGN
CALCULATIONS
WQ POND ANTI-SEEP.xls WQ POND J. E. SCHRUM, E.I.
WKS 98000 5/2/01
Anti-Seep Collar Design Sheet
This sheet will, given the barrel length of interest and minimum seep collar
projection from the barrel, determine the number of anti-seep collars to place
along the barrel section, and the expected spacing of the collars.
Design Requirements =_>
Anti-seep collars shall increase the flow path along the barrel by 15%.
Anti-seep collars shall be spaced a maximum of 14X the minimum collar projection
or 25 feet, whichever is less.
Anti-Seep Collar Design =_>
Flow Length Min. Calc'd # Max. # of Use
Pond along barrel Projection of collars Spacing collars to Spacing Spacing
ID (feet) (feet) required (feet) use (feet) OK?
Pond 6 80.0 2.00 3.00 25 3.00 20 YES
Note : If spacing to use is greater than the maximum spacing, add collars until the
spacing to use is equal to or less than the maximum spacing allowable for the collar
design. Anti-seep collars shall be used under the structural fill portions of all berms/dams
unless an approved drainage diaphragm is present at the downstream end of the barrel.
WQ POND ANTI-FLOTATION CALCULATION.As
WQ POND
WKS 98000
Manhole Riser/Barrel Anti-Flotation Calculation Sheet
Input Data =_>
Inside diameter of manhole = 6.0 feet
Wall thickness of manhole = 7.0 inches
Base thickness of manhole = 8.0 inches
Base diameter of manhole = 7.2 feet
Inside height of Manhole = 7.9 feet
Concrete unit weight = 142.0 PCF
OD of barrel exiting manhole = 45.5 inches
Size of drain pipe (if present) = 8.0 inches
Trash Rack water displacement = 114.9 CF
Concrete Present =_>
Total amount of concrete:
Base of Manhole = 26.893 CF
Manhole Walls = 95.310 CF
Adjust for openings:
Opening for barrel = 6.587 CF
Opening for drain pipe = 0.204 CF
J.E. SCHRUM, E.I.
5/4/01
Note: NC Products lists unit wt. of
manhole concrete at 142 PCF.
Total Concrete present, adjusted for openings = 115.413 CF
Weight of concrete present = 16389 Ibs
Amount of water displaced =_>
Displacement by concrete = 115.413 CF
Displacement by open air in riser = 223.368 CF
Displacement by trash rack = 114.930 CF
Total water displaced by riser/barrel structure = 453.711 CF
Weight of water displaced = 28312 Ibs
Page 1
r
r
r
r
r
r
r
r
r
r
r
r
r
r
r
r
r
r
r
r
r
r
r
r
r
r
r
r
r
r
r
r
r
r
r
r
r
r
r
r
r
r
WQ POND ANTI-FLOTATION CALCULATION.As
WQ POND
WKS 98000
Calculate amount of concrete to be added to riser =_>
J.E. SCHRUM, E.I.
5/4/01
Safety factor to use = 1.15 (recommend 1.15 or higher)
Must add = 16170 Ibs concrete for buoyancy
Concrete unit weight for use = 142 PCF (note above observation for NCP concrete)
Buoyant weight of this concrete = 79.60 PCF
Buoyant, with safety factor applied = 69.22 PCF
Therefore, must add = 233.607 CF of concrete
Standard based described above = 26.893 CF of concrete
Therefore, base design must have = 260.499 CF of concrete
Calculate size of base for riser assembly =_>
Diameter = 12.167 feet
Thickness = 27.0 inches
Concrete Present = 261.589 CF OK
Check validity of base as designed =_>
Total Water Displaced = 688.407 CF
Total Concrete Present = 350.109 CF
Total Water Displaced = 42957 Ibs
Total Concrete Present = 49715 Ibs
Actual safety factor = 1.16
Results of design =_>
OK
Base diameter = 12.17 feet
Base Thickness = 27.00 inches
CY of concrete total in base = 9.65 CY
Concrete unit weight in added base >= 142 PCF
Page 2
WQ POND VEL DIS.xls
36" O-RING RCP
WKS 98000
NRCD Land Quality Section
Pipe Design
Entering the following values will provide you with
the expected outlet velocity and depth of flow in a
pipe, assuming the Mannings roughness number is
constant over the entire length of the pipe.
.flow Q in cfs : 95.46
slope S in % : 0.94
pipe diameter D in in.: 36
Manning number n : 0.0 13
Flow depth (13) = 3.00
Outlet velocity (fps) = 13.505
NRCD Land Quality Section
NYDOT Dissipator Design Results
J.E. SCHRUM, E.I.
5/4/01
Pipe diameter (ft) 3.00
Outlet velocity (fps) 13.50
Apron length (ft) 24
= MAKE VELOCITY DISSIPATOR 35' LONG TO EXTEND BEYOND SANPCARY SEWER EASEMENT
AVG DIAM STONE THICKNESS
(inches) CLASS (inches)
-------- ----- ---------
3 A 9
6 B 22
13 B or 1 22 u
23 2 27
W = LA + Do
W=24+3.0
W = 17.0
SAY 17 ft
Soil & Environmental Consultants, Inc.
11010 Raven Ridge Road - Raleigh, North Carolina 27614 • Phone: [phone] - Fax: [phone]
Web Page: www.SandEC.com
010745
4°r
Since the impacted stream in this project is in the Neuse River Basin, this is a `s` QE0
courtesy notification request for a minor 401-Water Quality Certification to cover
142 linear ft. of stream channel and 568ft.2 of wetland impacts under Nationwide
Permit 39. Thus, a check for $200 is enclosed.
May 7th, 2001
NCDENR-DWQ US Army Corps of Engineers
Attn: Mr. John Dorney Attn: Mr. Todd Tugwell
4401 Reedy Creek Road 6508 Falls of the Neuse Rd., Ste. 120
Raleigh, NC 27606 Raleigh, NC 27615
RE: Nationwide Permits 12 & 39, Courtesy 401 Water Quality Certification Notification
& Neuse River Buffer Compliance Request
Butner Business Park
Butner, Granville County, North Carolina
(Latitude/Longitude: 36°07'00" N, 78°45'30" W) _c)
S&EC Project #: 00-5422 ? -
Dear Mr. Dorney and Mr. Tugwell, r-ri -I
C7 `?
On behalf of NWI. XX. L.P., John W. Nelley, Jr., Partner (property owner), we hereby
request authorization from the US Army Corps of Engineers to use Nationwide Permits
12 & 39 for the subject project to cover permanent and temporary impacts to stream
channels and wetlands. We also request written concurrence from the NC Division of
Water Quality (NC-DWQ) that the project complies with the Neuse River Basin Buffer
Rules. Since the impacted stream in this project is in the Neuse River Basin, we also
submit this application as a courtesy notification to NC-DWQ for a 401 Water Quality
Certification since stream channel impacts are less than 150 linear ft. of stream channel
and 1/3 acres of wetland impact. A Pre-construction Notification Application (PCN) is
attached, which includes an agent authorization form. Also, a "justification" letter for
the project is attached from the project engineer (The John R. McAdams Co.).
Wetland Delineation/Permitting/Mitigation Soil/Site Evaluations On-Site Septic Systems Environmental Assessments/Audits
Neuse Basin and Watershed Buffer Evaluations Groundwater Hydrology Endangered Species
Western Branch Offices: [phone] - [phone] - [phone]
S&EC delineated the wetlands and jurisdictional waters present on the subject site in
August 2000. Data forms completed for the wetland delineation are also attached.
Completed delineation maps have not yet been provided by the surveyor. However, as
soon as they are received, they will be sent to the USACE to have the delineation signed.
The proposed project, which consists of an industrial business park, is located
immediately west of Interstate 85, south of SR 1103, in Butner, NC. Please refer to the
attached map (Figure 1) for the project's location on a USGS topographic quadrangle.
The property comprises approximately 348.8 acres, 7.61acres of which are jurisdictional
wetlands (in the evaluated portion of the property). Of the total tract's 348.8 acres, a
detailed wetland delineation was performed on approximately 210 acres.
Approximately 142 linear ft. of stream channel and 0.013 acres of jurisdictional wetlands
will be impacted for proposed road crossings (Impact A) under Nationwide Permit 39.
The proposed sewer line crossing (Impact B) will temporarily impact 0.207 acres of
jurisdictional wetlands. Total impacts to waters of the U.S. and jurisdictional wetlands
for the project total 142 linear ft. and 0.220 acres, respectively, 0.207 acres of which are
temporary wetland impacts due to the sewer line.
The proposed road crossing (Impact A) will impact 11,578 ft.2 of Neuse River Buffer
(8,606 ft.2 in Zone 1, 2,972 ft.2 in Zone 2). The proposed sewer line crossing will have a
construction corridor width of less than 40 ft., crosses perpendicular to streams and
wetland areas, will be restored to original grade upon completion, and where it runs
parallel to the stream the construction corridor is greater than 50 ft. from the top of
stream bank. Thus, it is classified as an exempt activity for Neuse River Buffer rules. An
easement was obtained from the adjacent property owner to the northwest of the project
in order to route the sewer line to the nearby sewage treatment plant (see overall site
impact plan property line note). This is why it crosses the beaver impoundment in two
places instead of one.
The USACE's current policy requires applicants to avoid and minimize wetland and
stream channel impacts to the maximum extent practicable and compensatory mitigation
to offset unavoidable losses of waters of the US when impacts exceed the requirements
for notification (0.10 acre). The applicant requested a delineation of wetlands present on
the property prior to site plan development in order to avoid jurisdictional wetlands to the
maximum extent practicable. The road crossing (Impact A) was located in an area where
only stream channel (no wetlands) was impacted. Additionally, the sewer line was
realigned from its initial route in a manner to route it parallel to and 50 ft. from the
stream channel and to reduce jurisdictional wetland and Neuse River Buffer impacts as
minimization measures. The remaining 7.39 acres of jurisdictional wetlands and waters
of the U.S. of higher water quality not impacted by the project will be preserved onsite.
The above factors should be adequate for Corps-required mitigation.
NC-DWQ's current policy does not require mitigation for wetland and stream channel
impacts below I acre and 150 linear feet of significant channel. Because the proposed
cumulative impacts resulting from the project do not exceed the aforementioned
thresholds (0.013 acres and 142 linear ft.), S&EC believes that wetland or stream channel
mitigation should not be required by NC-DWQ. Additionally, the impacted buffer area
(0.266 acres) as a result of the road crossing (Impact A) is less than the 1/3 acres and less
than 150 ft. of channel per tributary buffer mitigation threshold, and thus, buffer
mitigation should not be required.
It is important to note that total impervious area onsite is expected to exceed 30%. A
stormwater treatment plan, dated May 4th, 2001, was sent by the John R. McAdams
Company to Todd St. John of the NC-DWQ, prior to and separately from this application.
A copy of the letter of transmittal is attached with this application.
Please call me if you require any additional information or have any questions.
Sincerely,
d,-
Jim Cooper
Environmental Scientist
Attachments:
Pre-construction (PCN) notification form
USGS Site Vicinity Map
Granville County Soil Survey Map
3 Proposed Wetland Impact Maps (1 overall, 1
Letter of no practical alternative from engineer
Agent Authorization Form
Wetland and upland data forms
NC-DWQ $200 Check (NC-DWQ copy only)
Copy of Stormwater Plan Letter of Transmittal
91?? q164?%
Kevin Martin
President
for Impact A, 1 for Impact B)
r_
1M s, ?
4
0?
pF AA"T-IT
r ?G
Pre-Construction Notification (PCN) Application Form
For Section 404 and/or Section 10 Nationwide, Regional and General Permits, Section 401
General Water Quality Certifications, and Riparian Buffer and Watershed Buffer Rules
This form is to be used for projects qualifying for any of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers' (USACE)
Nationwide, Regional or General Permits as required by Section 404 of the Clean Water Act and/or
Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act, and for the North Carolina Division of Water Quality's
(DWQ) associated General 401 Water Quality Certifications. This form is also to be used for any
project requiring approval under any Riparian Buffer Rules implemented by the N.C. Division of Water
Quality. This form should not be used if you are requesting an Individual 404 Permit or Individual 401
Water Quality Certification. The USACE Individual Permit application form is available online at
http://www.saw.usace.army.mil/wetlands/Pem-i app.htm.
The USACE is the lead regulatory agency. To review the requirements for the use of Nationwide,
Regional or General permits, and to determine which permit applies to your project, please go to the
USACE website at http•//www saw usace ai-my.mil/wetlands/regtour.htm, or contact one of the field
offices listed at the end of this application. The website also lists the responsible project manager for
each county in North Carolina and provides additional information regarding the identification and
regulation of wetlands and waters of the U.S.
The DWQ issues a corresponding Certification (General or Individual), and cannot tell the applicant
which 401 Certification will apply until the 404 Permit type has been determined by the USACE.
Applicants are encouraged to visit DWQ's 401 /Wetlands Unit website at
http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands to read about current requirements for the 401 Water Quality
Certification Program and to determine whether or not Riparian Buffer Rules are applicable. The
applicant is also advised to read the full text of the General Certification (GC) matching the specific 404
Permit requested. In some cases, written approval for some General Certifications is not required,
provided that the applicant adheres to all conditions of the GC. Applicants lacking access to the internet
should contact DWQ's Central Office in Raleigh at [phone].
Trout Waters Coordination - Special coordination with the North Carolina Wildlife Resources
Commission (NCWRC) is also required for projects occurring in any of North Carolina's twenty-five
counties that contain trout waters. In such cases, the applicant should contact the appropriate NCWRC
regional coordinator (listed by county on the last page of this application).
Page 1 of 13
CAMA Coordination - If the project occurs in any of North Carolina's twenty coastal counties (listed on
the last page of this application) the applicant should also contact the North Carolina Division of Coastal
Management (DCM) at [phone]. DCM will determine whether or not the project involves a
designated Area of Environmental Concern, in which case DCM will act as the lead permitting agency.
In such cases, DCM will require a Coastal Area Management Act (CAMA) Permit and will coordinate
the 404/401 Permits.
USACE Permits - Submit one copy of this form, along with supporting narratives, maps, data forms,
photos, etc. to the applicable USACE Regulatory Field Office (addresses are listed at the end of this
application). Upon receipt of an application, the USACE will determine if the application is complete as
soon as possible, not to exceed 30 days. This PCN form is designed for the convenience of the applicant
to address information. needs for all USACE Nationwide, Regional or General permits, as well as
information required for State authorizations, certifications, and coordination. Fully providing the
information requested on this form will result in a complete application for any of the USACE
Nationwide, Regional or General permits. To review the minimum amount of information that must be
provided for a complete PCN for each USACE Nationwide permit, see Condition 13, 65 Fed.Reg. 12893
(March 9, 2000), available at http•//www saw usace.army.mil/wetlands/nwpfinalFedReg.pdf.
Processing times vary by permit and begin once the application has been determined to be complete.
Please contact the appropriate regulatory field office for specific answers to permit processing periods.
401 Water Quality Certification or Buffer Rules - All information is required unless otherwise stated
as optional. Incomplete applications will be returned. Submit seven collated copies of all USACE
Permit materials to the Division of Water Quality, 401/Wetlands Unit, 1650 Mail Service Center,
Raleigh, NC, 27699-1650. If written approval is required or specifically requested for a 401
Certification, then a non-refundable application fee is required. In brief, if project impacts include less
than one acre of cumulative wetland/water impacts and less than 150 feet cumulative impacts to
streams, then a fee of $200 is required. If either of these thresholds is exceeded, then a fee of $475 is
required. A check made out to the North Carolina Division of Water Quality, with the specific name of
the project or applicant identified, should be stapled to the front of the application package. For more
information, see the DWQ website at http://h2o.ehnr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands/fees.html. The fee must be
attached with the application unless the applicant is a federal agency in which case the check may be
issued from a separate office. In such cases, the project must be identifiable on the U.S. Treasury check
so that it can be credited to the appropriate project. If written approval is sought solely for Buffer Rules,
the application fee does not apply, and the applicant should clearly state (in a cover letter) that only
Buffer Rule approval is sought in writing. Wetlands or waters of the U.S. may not be impacted prior to
issuance or waiver of a Section 401 Water Quality Certification. Upon receipt of a complete application
for a 401 Certification, the Division of Water Quality has 60 days to prepare a written response to the
applicant. This may include a 401 Certification, an on-hold letter pending receipt of additional
requested information, or denial.
Page 2 of 13
Office Use Only: Form Version April 2001
?45
USACE Action ID No. DWQ No.
If any particular item is not applicable to this project, please enter "Not Applicable" or "N/A" rather than
leaving the space blank.
1. Processing
1. Check all of the approval(s) requested for this project:
® Section 404 Permit
? Section 10 Permit
® 401 Water Quality Certification (courtesy notification)
® Riparian or Watershed Buffer Rules
2. Nationwide, Regional or General Permit Number(s) Requested: 39 & 12
3. If this notification is solely a courtesy copy because written approval for the 401 Certification
is not required, check here:
4. If payment into the North Carolina Wetlands Restoration Program (NCWRP) is proposed for
mitigation of impacts (see section VIII - Mitigation), check here: ?
II. Applicant Information
1. Owner/Applicant Information
Name: NWI XX L.P., John Nelley Jr. Partner
Mailing Address: Fourty-Four Business Center, 782 Melrose Ave., Nashville, TN 37211
Telephone Number: (615)-366-6200 Fax Number:
E-mail Address:
2. Agent Information (A signed and dated copy of the Agent Authorization letter must be
attached if the Agent has signatory authority for the owner/applicant.)
Name: Jim Cooper
Company Affiliation: Soil & Environmental Consultants
Mailing Address: 11010 Raven Ridge Rd. Raleigh NC 27614
Telephone Number: (919)-846-5900 Fax Number: (919)-846-9467
E-mail Address: jcooperAsandec com
Page 3 of 13
III. Project Information
Attach a vicinity map clearly showing the location of the property with respect to local
landmarks such as towns, rivers, and roads. Also provide a detailed site plan showing property
boundaries and development plans in relation to surrounding properties. Both the vicinity map
and site plan must include a scale and north arrow. The specific footprints of all buildings,
impervious surfaces, or other facilities must be included. If possible, the maps and plans should
include the appropriate USGS Topographic Quad Map and NRCS Soil Survey with the property
boundaries outlined. Plan drawings, or other maps may be included at the applicant's discretion,
so long as the property is clearly defined. For administrative and distribution purposes, the
USACE requires information to be submitted on sheets no larger than 11 by 17-inch format;
however, DWQ may accept paperwork of any size. DWQ prefers full-size construction
drawings rather than a sequential sheet version of the full-size plans. If full-size plans are
reduced to a small scale such that the final version is illegible, the applicant will be informed that
the project has been placed on hold until decipherable maps are provided.
1. Name of project: Butner Business Park
2. T.I.P. Project Number (NCDOT
3. Property Identification Number (Tax PIN):
4. Location
County: Granville Nearest Town: Butner
Subdivision name (include phase/lot number): N/A
Directions to site (include road numbers, landmarks, etc.): The site is immediately west of I-
85 south of SR 1103 (which is an exit off I-85) in Butner Granville County, NC.
5. Site coordinates, if available (UTM or Lat/Long): 36°07'00" N 78°45'30" W
(Note - If project is linear, such as a road or utility line, attach a sheet that separately lists the
coordinates for each crossing of a distinct waterbody.)
6. Describe the existing land use or condition of the site at the time of this application:
Forested-, and/or timbered a rough graded unpaved road system is in place and has been for
many years
7. Property size (acres): approximately 348.8 acres
8. Nearest body of water (stream/river/sound/ocean/lake): Unnamed tributaries to Falls Lake
9. River Basin: N
Page 4 of 13
(Note - this must be one of North Carolina's seventeen designated major river basins. The
River Basin map is available at http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/admin/maps .)
10. Describe the purpose of the proposed work: The proposed project consists of a mixed
industrial/commercial park that will provide employment in the Butner area.
11. List the type of equipment to be used to construct the project: Heavy machinery associated
with the construction of industrial/commercial facilities will be used for this project.
12. Describe the land use in the vicinity of this project: Residential and Forested
IV. Prior Project History
if jurisdictional determinations and/or permits have been requested and/or obtained for this
project (including all prior phases of the same subdivision) in the past, please explain. Include
the USACE Action ID Number, DWQ Project Number, application date, and date permits and
certifications were issued or withdrawn. Provide photocopies of previously issued permits,
certifications or other useful information. Describe previously approved wetland, stream and
buffer impacts, along with associated mitigation (where applicable). If this is a NCDOT project,
list and describe permits issued for prior segments of the same T.I.P. project, along with
construction schedules.
No permits have been applied for nor received for this property (wetland survey will be
submitted as soon as it is received from the surveyors)
V. Future Project Plans
Are any additional permit requests anticipated for this project in the future? If so, describe the
anticipated work, and provide justification for the exclusion of this work from the current
application: Exact development plans for the site are unknown at this time; however, additional
work is expected to take place in upland areas only.
VI. Proposed Impacts to Waters of the United States/Waters of the State
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
wetlands, open water, and stream channels associated with the project. The applicant must also
provide justification for these impacts in Section VII below. All proposed impacts, permanent
Page 5 of 13
and temporary, must be listed herein, and must be clearly identifiable on an accompanying site
plan. All wetlands and waters, and all streams (intermittent and perennial) must be shown on a
delineation map, whether or not impacts are proposed to these systems. Wetland and stream
evaluation and delineation forms should be included as appropriate. Photographs may be
included at the applicant's discretion. If this proposed impact is strictly for wetland or stream
mitigation, list and describe the impact in Section VIII below. If additional space is needed for
listing or description, please attach a separate sheet.
1. Wetland Impacts
Wetland Impact
Site Number
indicate on ma
Type of Impact* Area of
Impact
(acres) Located within
100-year Floodplain**
es/no Distance to
Nearest Stream
linear feet
Type of Wetland***
A Road Crossing 0.013 No --- stream channel
B Sewer Line
Crossing 0.207 No --- Beaver pond/marsh

* List each impact separately and identify temporary impacts. Impacts include, but are not limited to: mechanized clearing, grading, nu,
excavation, flooding, ditching/drainage, etc. For dams, separately list impacts due to both structure and flooding.
** 100-Year floodplains are identified through the Federal Emergency Management Agency's (FEMA) Flood Insurance Rate Maps
(FIRM), or FEMA-approved local floodplain maps. Maps are available through the FEMA Map Service Center at 1-800-358-9616, or
online at http://www.fenia.gov.
*** List a wetland type that best describes wetland to be impacted (e.g., freshwater/saltwater marsh, forested wetland, beaver pond,
Carolina Bay, bog, etc.)
List the total acreage (estimated) of existing wetlands on the property: 7.61 (in evaluated
area only)
Total area of wetland impact proposed: 0.220 acres (0.207 acres temporary)
2. Stream Impacts, including all intermittent and perennial streams
Stream Impact
Site Number
indicate on ma
Type of Impact* Length of
Impact
linear feet
Stream Name* * Average Width
of Stream
Before Impact Perennial or
Intermittent?
(please secif )
A Road Crossing 142 ft. UT to Falls Lake 4 Intermittent

Page 6 of 13
* List each impact separately and identify temporary impacts. Impacts include, but are not limited to: culverts and associated rip-rap,
dams (separately list impacts due to both structure and flooding), relocation (include linear feet before and after, and net loss/gain),
stabilization activities (cement wall, rip-rap, crib wall, gabions, etc.), excavation, ditching/straightening, etc. If stream relocation is
proposed, plans and profiles showing the linear footprint for both the original and relocated streams must be included.
** Stream names can be found on USGS topographic maps. If a stream has no name, list as UT (unnamed tributary) to the nearest
downstream named stream into which it flows. USGS maps are available through the USGS at 1-800-358-9616, or online at
www.usgs.gov. Several intemet sites also allow direct download and printing of USGS maps (e.g., www.topozone.com,
www.inapquest.com, etc.).
Cumulative impacts (linear distance in feet) to all streams on site: 142 ft.
3. Open Water Impacts, including Lakes, Ponds, Estuaries, Sounds, Atlantic Ocean and any
other Water of the U.S.
Open Water Impact
Site Number
indicate on ma
Type of Impact* Area of
Impact
acres Name of Waterbody
(if applicable) Type of Waterbody
(lake, pond, estuary, sound,
bay, ocean, etc.)

* List each impact separately and identify temporary impacts. Impacts inclu&, but are not limited to: till, excavation, dredging,
flooding, drainage, bulkheads, etc.
4. Pond Creation
If construction of a pond is proposed, associated wetland and stream impacts should be
included above in the wetland and stream impact sections. Also, the proposed pond should
be described here and illustrated on any maps included with this application.
Pond to be created in (check all that aanlvl uplands _n 846 R _h-I wetlands
Describe o construction ?&am/embankment, excavation, installatioe#
dray own valve or spillway, etc.) "Refer to John R. McAdams Stormwater Plan (see
use or
requirement, etc.):
watering, irrigation, aesthetic, trout pond,
Size of watershed draining to pond: Expected pond surface area:
VII. Impact Justification (Avoidance and Minimization)
Specifically describe measures taken to avoid the proposed impacts. It may be useful to provide
information related to site constraints such as topography, building ordinances, accessibility, and
financial viability of the project. The applicant may attach drawings of alternative, lower-impact
site layouts, and explain why these design options were not feasible. Also discuss how impacts
were minimized once the desired site plan was developed. If applicable, discuss construction
techniques to be followed during construction to reduce impacts.
Page 7 of 13
The applicant request a detailed wetland delineation prior to development a site plan in order
to avoid and minimize impacts to wetland and waters of the U.S. The proposed road crossing
was planned and situated in a manner to impact only jurisdictional stream channel without
impacting wetland areas along the stream. The propsed perpendicular sewer line crossing will
result in only temporary impacts to jurisdictional wetland and waters of the U.S, and is at least
80-90 ft from the stream where it runs parallel to the channel. All other wetland areas and
waters of the U.S. were avoided.
VIII. Mitigation
DWQ - In accordance with 15A NCAC 2H .0500, mitigation may be required by the NC
Division of Water Quality for projects involving greater than or equal to one acre of impacts to
freshwater wetlands or greater than or equal to 150 linear feet of total impacts to perennial
streams.
USACE - In accordance with the Final Notice of Issuance and Modification of Nationwide
Permits, published in the Federal Register on March 9, 2000, mitigation will be required when
necessary to ensure that adverse effects to the aquatic environment are minimal. Factors
including size and type of proposed impact and function and relative value of the impacted
aquatic resource will be considered in determining acceptability of appropriate and practicable
mitigation as proposed. Examples of mitigation that may be appropriate and practicable include,
but are not limited to: reducing the size of the project; establishing and maintaining wetland
and/or upland vegetated buffers to protect open waters such as streams; and replacing losses of
aquatic resource functions and values by creating, restoring, enhancing, or preserving similar
functions and values, preferable in the same watershed.
If mitigation is required for this project, a copy of the mitigation plan must be attached in order
for USACE or DWQ to consider the application complete for processing. Any application
lacking a required mitigation plan or NCWRP concurrence shall be placed on hold as
incomplete. An applicant may also choose to review the current guidelines for stream restoration
in DWQ's Draft Technical Guide for Stream Work in North Carolina, available at
http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands/stn-ngide.html.
1. Provide a brief description of the proposed mitigation plan. The description should provide
as much information as possible, including, but not limited to: site location (attach directions
and/or map, if offsite), affected stream and river basin, type and amount (acreage/linear feet)
of mitigation proposed (restoration, enhancement, creation, or preservation), a plan view,
preservation mechanism (e.g., deed restrictions, conservation easement, etc.), and a
Page 8 of 13
description of the current site conditions and proposed method of construction. Please attach
a separate sheet if more space is needed.
Impacts to jurisdictional wetlands and waters of the U.S., totaling 0.220 acres (0.207
acres of which are temporary impacts from the sewer line crossing) of wetland impacts and
142 linear ft of stream channel impacts are below NC-DWO mitigation thresholds.
Therefore no mitigation should be required for the NC-DWO. Stream channel impacts were
minimized and the road crossing (Impact A) only impacts jurisdictional stream channel-, no
wetlands will be impacted All other wetlands of higher water quality onsite will be avoided.
We believe the permanent channel impacts are to a Corps-unimportant stream and sewer line
impacts are temporary. Therefore no mitigation beyond avoidance, minimization, and
preservation should be required by the USACE.
2. Mitigation may also be made by payment into the North Carolina Wetlands Restoration
Program (NCWRP) with the NCWRP's written agreement. Check the box indicating that
you would like to pay into the NCWRP. Please note that payment into the NCWRP must be
reviewed and approved before it can be used to satisfy mitigation requirements. Applicants
will be notified early in the review process by the 401/Wetlands Unit if payment into the
NCWRP is available as an option. For additional information regarding the application
process for the NCWRP, check the NCWRP website at http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/wrp/index.htin If
use of the NCWRP is proposed, please check the appropriate box on page three and provide
the following information:
Amount of stream mitigation requested (linear feet):
Amount of buffer mitigation requested (square feet):
Amount of Riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres):
Amount of Non-riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres):
Amount of Coastal wetland mitigation requested (acres):
IX. Environmental Documentation (DWQ Only)
Does the project involve an expenditure of public funds or the use of public (federal/state/local)
land?
Yes ? No
Page 9 of 13
If yes, does the project require preparation of an environmental document pursuant to the
requirements of the National or North Carolina Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
Note: If you are not sure whether a NEPA/SEPA document is required, call the SEPA
coordinator at [phone] to review current thresholds for environmental documentation.
Yes ? No ?
If yes, has the document review been finalized by the State Clearinghouse? If so, please attach a
copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval letter.
Yes ? No ?
X. Proposed Impacts on Riparian and Watershed Buffers (DWQ Only)
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
required state and local buffers associated with the project. The applicant must also provide
justification for these impacts in Section VII above. All proposed impacts must be listed herein,
and must be clearly identifiable on the accompanying site plan. All buffers must be shown on a
map, whether or not impacts are proposed to the buffers. Correspondence from the DWQ
Regional Office may be included as appropriate. Photographs may also be included at the
applicant's discretion.
Will the project impact protected riparian buffers identified within 15A NCAC 2B .0233
(Neuse), 15A NCAC 2B .0259 (Tar-Pamlico), 15A NCAC 2B .0250 (Randleman Rules and
Water Supply Buffer Requirements), or other (please identify )?
Yes ® No E] If you answered "yes", provide the following information:
Identify the square feet and acreage of impact to each zone of the riparian buffers. If buffer
mitigation is required calculate the required amount of mitigation by applying the buffer
multipliers.
Zone* Impact
(square feet Multiplier Required
Mitigation
1 8,606 ft.' 3
2 2,972 ft.Z 1.5
Total 11,578 ft.2
* Zone 1 extends out 30 feet perpendicular trom near bank of channel; Lone [ extends an
additional 20 feet from the edge of Zone 1.
If buffer mitigation is required, please discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (i.e., Donation
of Property, Conservation Easement, Riparian Buffer Restoration / Enhancement, Preservation or
Payment into the Riparian Buffer Restoration Fund). Please attach all appropriate information as
identified within 15A NCAC 2B .0242 or .0260.
Page 10 of 13
XI. Stormwater (DWQ Only)
Describe impervious acreage (both existing and proposed) versus total acreage on the site.
Discuss stormwater controls proposed in order to protect surface waters and wetlands
downstream from the property.
Impervious acreage onsite is expected to be greater than 30%. A stormwater plan has been
submitted separately from this application to Todd St. John of the NC-DWQ the engineer (the
John R McAdams Company A copy of the submittal form for the stormwater plan is enclosed
in this application
XII. Sewage Disposal (DWQ Only)
Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of
wastewater generated from the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
Connection to sanitary sewer
XIII. Violations (DWQ Only)
Is this site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500) or any Buffer Rules?
Yes ? No
Is this an after-the-fact permit application?
Yes ? No
XIV. Other Circumstances (Optional):
It is the applicant's responsibility to submit the application sufficiently in advance of desired
construction dates to allow processing time for these permits. However, an applicant may
choose to list constraints associated with construction or sequencing that may impose limits on
work schedules (e.g., draw-down schedules for lakes, dates associated with Endangered and
Threatened Species, accessibility problems, or other issues outside of the applicant's control).
D
Applican Agent' Signature /V v y Date
Page 11 of 13
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant is provided.)
US Army Corps Of Engineers Field Offices and County Coverage
Asheville Regulatory Field Office Alexander Cherokee Iredell Mitchell Union
US Army Corps of Engineers Avery Clay Jackson Polk Watauga
151 Patton Avenue Buncombe Cleveland Lincoln Rowan Yancey
Room 208 Burke Gaston Macon Rutherford
Asheville, NC 28801-5006 Cabarrus Graham Madison Stanley
Telephone: [phone] Caldwell Haywood McDowell Swain
Fax: [phone] Catawba Henderson Mecklenburg Transylvania
Raleigh Regulatory Field Office Alamance Durham Johnston Rockingham Wilson
US Army Corps Of Engineers Alleghany Edgecombe Lee Stokes Yadkin
6508 Falls of the Neuse Road Ashe Franklin Nash Surry
Suite 120 Caswell Forsyth Northampton Vance
Raleigh, NC 27615 Chatham Granville Orange Wake
Telephone: [phone] Davidson Guilford Person Warren
Fax: [phone] Davie Halifax Randolph Wilkes
Washington Regulatory Field Office Beaufort Currituck Jones Pitt
US Army Corps Of Engineers Bertie Dare Lenoir Tyrrell
Post Office Box 1000 Camden Gates Martin Washington
Washington, NC 27889-1000 Carteret* Green Pamlico Wayne
Telephone: [phone] Chowan Hertford Pasquotank
Fax: [phone] Craven Hyde Perquimans *Croatan Nati onal Forest Only
Wilmington Regulatory Field Office Anson Duplin Onslow
US Army Corps Of Engineers Bladen Harnett Pender
Post Office Box 1890 Brunswick Hoke Richmond
Wilmington, NC 28402-1890 Carteret Montgomery Robeson
Telephone: [phone] Columbus Moore Sampson
Fax: [phone] Cumberland New Hanover Scotland
US Fis
US Fish and Wildlife Service
Raleigh Field Office
Post Office Box 33726
Raleigh, NC 27636-3726
Telephone: [phone]
h and Wildlife Service / National N]
US Fish and Wildlife Service
Asheville Field Office
160 Zillicoa Street
Asheville, NC 28801
Telephone: [phone]
arine Fisheries Service
National Marine Fisheries Service
Habitat Conservation Division
Pivers Island
Beaufort, NC 28516
Telephone: [phone]
North Carolina State Agencies
Division of Water Quality
401 Wetlands Unit
1650 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1650
Telephone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Division of Water Quality
Wetlands Restoration Program
1619 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1619
Telephone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
State Historic Preservation Office
Department Of Cultural Resources
4617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-4617
Telephone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Page 12 of 13
CAMA and NC Coastal Counties
Division of Coastal Management Beaufort Chowan Hertford Pasquotank
1638 Mail Service Center Bertie Craven Hyde Pender
Raleigh, NC 27699-1638 Brunswick Currituck New Hanover Perquimans
Telephone: [phone] Camden Dare Onslow Tyrrell
Fax: [phone] Carteret Gates Pamlico Washington
NCWRC and NC Trout Counties
Western Piedmont Region Coordinator
3855 Idlewild Road
Kemersville, NC 27284-9180
Telephone: [phone]
Mountain Region Coordinator
20830 Great Smoky Mtn. Expressway
Waynesville, NC 28786
Telephone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Alleghany Caldwell Watauga
Ashe Mitchell Wilkes
Avery Stokes
Burke Surry
Buncombe Henderson Polk
Cherokee Jackson Rutherford
Clay Macon Swain
Graham Madison Transylvania
Haywood McDowell Yancey
Page 13 of 13
L
FIGURE 1: USGS SITE VICINITY MAP
aW ? o z
350 •
ater
ank
Res'-
8 7 a t ..? .
? ? 13 ?i!
\J ?M¦
w j ? OA
?'/ 350 ?3 ••y?• • •? •
H 4 O'
i
\?\ _ ?r o? Libr r • ry
0
000 .•
O 6O UNITED STATES
110 jDEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
3°° „ GEOLOGICAL SURVEY
• HENDERSON 27 Ml.
100 ??` 35 1 45' 703000- E. OXFORD 16 Ml. 704
0-6
o l 1
7 Q ?.. 106 ?4\ ?o
161
9 % \ 1104 '?•,/.' ;?
1.00 \\ 65 -) I '? \ 1 \
350
01/1
•°\ \ ?? ; ? Aso .., ?.? •=?' -,-J???,/''!?--?? ,j1? ^J
o• I / w vv; l ?? L? ?'
FIGURE 2: GRANVILLE COUNTY SOIL SURVEY MAP
U.S. DEPARTMENTOF AGRICUI I
SOIL CONSERVATION SERM
IrB
n

r

CrB
February 27, 2001
STATEMENT OF JUSTIFICATION
Project Name: Butner Business Park
Address: S.R. 1103
Granville County, NC
Applicant: NWI XX, LP
C/O Weeks Corporation
782 Melrose Avenue
Nashville, Tennessee 37211
Tract Size:
Unit Count:
348.8 Acres
N/A
Granville County P.I.N: 0876.03-22-9677
The current site plan for this mixed-use business/commercial project has one point of
access. This access is off of SR 1103. The crossing is a point of interest because the
drive penetrates a Neuse River buffer.
Per NCDOT requirements, the access road (Business Park Drive) must be constructed a
minimum of 800 ft from Interstate 85. Business Park Drive will be parallel to the
Interstate. Complying with this requirement will necessitate building the road across the
stream buffer in the location shown (See plan, Buffer Disturbance "A").
Additionally, pockets of wetlands exist between the end of the buffer and I-85 (See
WETLAND AREA 5 and 6 on Sheet 1 of 4). By crossing the stream at the point
suggested, impact to wetlands can be avoided.
If1l.Hl/XRJ
JVM'J AN
91/Z4j2dg1 59 9198469467 The.
002 oast
01010 Ray= Ridsc R'aad itala+gh. Norh CM UFO z?bla phao-- [phone] • FSx' (9197 6?Cr446i
web ftr,. www-sadmc.ceu
AGENT AUTHOMATION FORM
All ks To Be Bided In By '? h2 Carrent Lamed
rlaate: P; John W?. Nell ar. r
.,-. u, Ana - TN 37211
Address:..,, --X-MULL--x
Phane:. 0
project Name/ Descriptien: Butner Bnsineas Center, Butner NC
27, 200
gl-
Date: Febru
'The Departn=t of the Army
U.S. Army Corps of Etgineers, WilmiV9ton District
P.O. Box
Wilcnix?gtcal, NC 28402
`-T- w?
Attn:
Field Office: ,
Re: Wedand5 Related Cax Wftg and PermiWftg
To Whom It May Ccmcern:
L the current 1propla owner, hereby desipate and authorize Sod pnairottmet1ta1 CoriWltikats, Ins-, to
act in Mir behalf as MY agent in the processing of permit apphcaiions, to furnish PO re4
supp1gzru! ttal infotuwtion in support of appticatiom, etc from this day Em ward. The 2 t day c=
LICVVLH, OTV %?
Ibis noti&etion supersedes any previous c°rrespondee coxtcerrling the agent for this project
NOTICh: This authalization, far Habffity and professicaW coaitesy xneasow, is valid duly for
government officials to enta the property when accompanied by 5"C staff. You should call S&EC
to arranp a site mreting prior to visiking the site. n, t.. 1 x , c P
anhn W Netlev dr.
print piroperty'Ownpr's Name
cc: Mz.1&0 Domey
NCD£NR - DWQ, Water QwUtY Plarub+g
4401 Reedy Creek Road
Raleigh, NC 2.7607
N
- 02-
proper L s Signature
cc: mr. Kept Martin
Son & EnvirozunMW Consulbwt5• Inc.
w*VJ:xSau au& f0-wetlmd A?? Qn u etion SaillSim Evdnatio? ?os?rit fittka?dan=Mu?meo SPgl Auasstt?tslAndlts
os/P?za{t S •S ?ks
New Su?ln end Wxmbed Sot ?QadW r'Mw
weaceie+ Branch poxes (62fi) 655-5820 (S?8) 31Z-79oi (704)5-16-M2
aNnn Wd Z0:90 (1HL
01:40pm From-THE JOHN R MCADAMS COMPANY INC 9193612269 T-589 P.02/02 F-271
TIM JofN R. McADiVgS CONVANY" INC.
'-STTER OF TRANSMITTAL
"Q:; Todd St. John
r
Division of Water Quality
Environmental Sciences Branch
4401 Reedy Creek Rd.
Raleigh, North Carolina 27607
Re: Butner Business Park Water Quality Pond #1
am sending you the following item(s):
Date: May 4, 2001
** FEDERAL EXPRESS **
Job No.: WKS 98000
COPIES DATE NO. DESCRIPTION
7 3 3 Water Quali Pond Design Calculations
3 3 Accompanying Watershed Maps
3 3 Water Quality Pond Plans and Details

i
i
These are transmitted as checked below:
r"1 As requested
{j For approval
? For review and comment
Remarks:
? For your use

Copy to: Tim Michael Signed:
FOR INTERNAL USE ONLY
® Copy Letter of Transmittal Only to File
? Copy Entire Document to File
CIVIL ENGINEERING - LAND PLANNING • SURVEYING
po f3OX 14005 . Research Triangle Park, NG 27709 . (919)361-M - fax [phone]
www.johnrmcadams.com
Wetland Delineation Performed By:
11010 Raven Ridge Road
Raleigh, North Carolina 27614
[phone]
Soil & Environmental Consultants, Inc.
231 16th Avenue NE
Hickory, North Carolina 28601
[phone]
DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
ject/Site: Butner Business Park/Project # 5422
P Date: 8/18/00
ro
Applicant/Owner: John R. McAdams
ator: K Martin T Preuninger
Investi County: Granville
State: NC
g
Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site? x Yes No Community ID: Beaver Impoundment
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation)? -Yes x No Transect ID: wetland
Is the area a potential Problem Area? _Yes x No Plot ID: 50 feet from flag 2216
If needed, explain on reverse.
ref-CTATIMI
ecies
t Plant S
i
D Stratum Indicator Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator
p
nan
om
1. Boehmaria cylindrica HERB FACW+ 9.
2. Diodia virginiana HERB FACW 10.
3. Microstegium vimineum
4. Hibiscus moscheutos HERB
HERB FAC
OBL 11.
12.
5. Polygonum sagittatum
6. HERB OBL 13.
14.
7. 15.
8. 16.

Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW,or FAC
(excluding FAC- :
100%

Remarks:
ivnoni nlSv
Recorded Data: Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
-
Stream, Lake or Tide Gauge Primary Indicators:
-
-Aerial Photographs X Inundated
Other x Saturated in Upper 12 Inches
-Water marks
x No Recorded Data Available -Drift Lines
Sediment Deposits
x Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Field Observations: Secondary Indicators (2 or more required):
Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 Inches
Depth of Surface Water: 0-24" (in.) x Water-Stained Leaves
-Local Soil Survey Data
Depth to Free Water in Pit: NA (in.) _FAC-Neutral Test
-Other (Explain in Remarks)
Depth to Saturated Soil: 0 (in.)
Remarks:
Wetland Delineation Performed By
11010 Raven Ridge Road
Raleigh, North Carolina 27614
[phone]
Soil & Environmental Consultants, Inc.
231 16th Avenue NE
Hickory, North Carolina 28601
[phone]
Project/Site: Butner Business Park/Proiect # 5422 Plot ID: wetland, near flag 216
QAII C
Map Unit Name Drainage Class: poorly
(Series and Phase): Picture Field Observations
Taxonomy (Subgroup): Vertic Argiaguoll Confirm Mapped Type? X Yes - No
Profile Description:
Depth Matrix Color Mottle Color Mottle Texture, Concretions,
(inches) Horizon (Munsell Moist) (Munsell Moist) Abundance/Contrast Structure, etc.
0-11 A 10YR 3/2 Clay loam
11-18+ Bt 10YR 4/1 7.5YR5/6 Common/prominent Clay
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Histosol x Concretions
_
Histic Epipedon -High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
_
Sulfidic Odor Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
x Aquic Moisture Regime Listed on Local Hydric Soils List
Reducing Conditions x Listed on National Hydric Soils List
x Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors -Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
IAICTI ANnC IICTP0U1AIAT1nPJ
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? x Yes _No Is this sampling point within a wetland?
Wetland Hydrology Present? x Yes No x Yes
Q 5O(®C`
Hydric Soils Present? x Yes No
Remarks:
???. 1 QB3
?'?'VORTM
l?
Wetland Delineation Performed By:
11010 Raven Ridge Road
Raleigh, North Carolina 27614
[phone]
Soil & Environmental Consultants, Inc.
231 16th Avenue NE
Hickory, North Carolina 28601
[phone]
DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
Project/Site: Butner Business Park/Project # 5422 Date: 8/18/00
Applicant/Owner: John R. McAdams County: Granville
Investigator: K. Martin, T. Preuninger State: NC

Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site? x Yes No Community ID: Mixed Pine/Oak
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation)? _Yes -x No Transect ID: upland
Is the area a potential Problem Area? _Yes x No Plot ID: 50 feet from flag 216
If needed, explain on reverse.
VEGETATION
Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator
1. Pinus taeda TREE FAC 9.
2. Juniperus virginiana TREE FACU- 10.
3. Morus rubra SHRUB FAC 11.
4. Ulmus rubra SAPLING FAC 12.
5. Corpus flodda SHRUB FACU 13.
6. Carya glabra SAPLING FACU 14.
7. Vtis rotundifolia VINE FAC 15.
8. Lonicera sem evirens VINE FAC 16.
Percent of Dominant Species that are O BL, FACW,or FAC
(excluding FAC- : 63%
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
-Recorded Data: Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
_Stream, Lake or Tide Gauge Primary Indicators:
-Aerial Photographs -Inundated
-Other -Saturated in Upper 12 Inches
-Water Marks
x No Recorded Data Available -Drift Lines
-Sediment Deposits
-Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Field Observations: Secondary Indicators (2 or more required):
-Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 Inches
Depth of Surface Water: NA (in.) _Water-Stained Leaves
Local soil survey Data
Depth to Free Water in Pit: NA (in.) _FAC-Neutral Test
Other (Explain in Remarks)
-
Depth to Saturated Soil: >12 (in.)
Remarks:
Wetland Delineation Performed By: Soil & Environmental Consultants, Inc.
11010 Raven Ridge Road 231 16th Avenue NE
Raleigh, North Carolina 27614 Hickory, North Carolina 28601
[phone] [phone]
Project/Site: Butner Business Park/Proiect # 5422 Plot ID: upland, near flap 216
SOILS
Map Unit Name Drainage Class: Poorly
(Series and Phase): Picture Field Observations
Taxonomy (Subgroup): Vertic Argiaguoll Confirm Mapped Type? x Yes _ No
Profile Description:
Depth Matrix Color Mottle Color Mottle Texture, Concretions,
(inches) Horizon (Munsell Moist) (Munsell Moist) Abundance/Contrast Structure, etc.
0-11 A 10YR 3/2 Clay loam
11-18+ Bt 10YR 411 7.5YR5/6 Common/prominent Clay
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Histosol x Concretions
_
_Histic Epipedon -High Organic Content in Surface Layer i n Sandy Soils
Sulfidic Odor Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
x Aquic Moisture Regime Listed on Local Hydric Soils List
Reducing Conditions x Listed on National Hydric Soils List
x Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors -Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
WETLANDS DETERMINATION
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? x Yes No Is this sampling point within a wetland?
Wetland Hydrology Present? -Yes x No -Yes x No
Hydric Soils Present? x Yes _No
Remarks: _'O'V SOIL SC
C.?f
aPNO H
axotxcx xo. WK5 -9100
irrrriwrirriirrrrrrrrrrrrrrYMrr
ra AXE
r WK5980EO.DWC

?b lid
iuE?
"
"=500

BUTNER BUSINESS PARR
NORTH CAROLINA
INC.
MRS
Nc
-1006
® rvn?--aovvw
pN,?? BUTNER BUSINESS PARK
a
Herat;, rVf'suti!yt::riilflt,:s;, NORTH CAROLINA

"- y" THE JOHN R. McADAMS ?
11 "NkVE, W sg805Xa WG BUTNER BUSINESS PARK A'C0MPANYj,NC,
CALEt i, ".-30i - E.yG(TJ??RS?PI.AN?'BR'/2V`tl?Sl:
RESF./'RCH TRIANGLE PARK, NC:
ATE! NOM CAROLINA P.0 EOK 14006 2IP 27709.4005
114 - ? i, (9l °ihe!';4WD
Soil & Environmental
11010 Raven Ridge Road - Raleigh, North Carolina 27614
Consultants, Inc.
Phone: [phone] - Fax: [phone]
Web Page: www.SandEC.com
?r
Since the impacted stream in this project is in the Neuse River Basin, this is a
courtesy notification request for a minor 401-Water Quality Certification to cover
142 linear ft. of stream channel and 568ft 2 of wetland impacts under Nationwide
Permit 39. Thus, a check for $200 is enclosed.
1b' l, o
i
?Q
May 7th, 2001
NCDENR-DWQ
Attn: Mr. John Dorney
4401 Reedy Creek Road
Raleigh, NC 27606
US Army Corps of Engineers
Attn: Mr. Todd Tugwell
6508 Falls of the Neuse Rd., Ste. 120
Raleigh, NC 27615
RE: Nationwide Permits 12 & 39, Courtesy 401 Water Quality Certification Notification
& Neuse River Buffer Compliance Request
Butner Business Park
Butner, Granville County, North Carolina
(Latitude/Longitude: 36°07'00" N, 78°45'30" W) 010745
S&EC Project #: 00-5422 Dear Mr. Dorney and Mr. Tugwell,

On behalf of NWI. XX. L.P., John W. Nelley, Jr., Partner (property owner), we hereby
request authorization from the US Army Corps of Engineers to use Nationwide Permits
12 & 39 for the subject project to cover permanent and temporary impacts to stream
channels and wetlands. We also request written concurrence from the NC Division of
Water Quality (NC-DWQ) that the project complies with the Neuse River Basin Buffer
Rules. Since the impacted stream in this project is in the Neuse River Basin, we also
submit this application as a courtesy notification to NC-DWQ for a 401 Water Quality
Certification since stream channel impacts are less than 150 linear ft. of stream channel
and 1/3 acres of wetland impact. A Pre-construction Notification Application (PCN) is
attached, which includes an agent authorization form. Also, a "justification" letter for
the project is attached from the project engineer (The John R. McAdams Co.).
cFri
r--"
?-y
r-,- I
rri
U ,--=4
Wetland Delineation/Permitting/Mitigation Soil/Site Evaluations On-Site Septic Systems Environmental Assessments/Audits
Neuse Basin and Watershed Buffer Evaluations Groundwater Hydrology Endangered Species
Western Branch Offices: [phone] - [phone] - [phone]
S&EC delineated the wetlands and jurisdictional waters present on the subject site in
August 2000. Data forms completed for the wetland delineation are also attached.
Completed delineation maps have not yet been provided by the surveyor. However, as
soon as they are received, they will be sent to the USACE to have the delineation signed.
The proposed project, which consists of an industrial business park, is located
immediately west of Interstate 85, south of SR 1103, in Butner, NC. Please refer to the
attached map (Figure 1) for the project's location on a USGS topographic quadrangle.
The property comprises approximately 348.8 acres, 7.61acres of which are jurisdictional
wetlands (in the evaluated portion of the property). Of the total tract's 348.8 acres, a
detailed wetland delineation was performed on approximately 210 acres.
Approximately 142 linear ft. of stream channel and 0.013 acres of jurisdictional wetlands
will be impacted for proposed road crossings (Impact A) under Nationwide Permit 39.
The proposed sewer line crossing (Impact B) will temporarily impact 0.207 acres of
jurisdictional wetlands. Total impacts to waters of the U.S. and jurisdictional wetlands
for the project total 142 linear ft. and 0.220 acres, respectively, 0.207 acres of which are
temporary wetland impacts due to the sewer line.
The proposed road crossing (Impact A) will impact 11,578 ft.2 of Neuse River Buffer
(8,606 ft.2 in Zone 1, 2,972 ft.2 in Zone 2). The proposed sewer line crossing will have a
construction corridor width of less than 40 ft., crosses perpendicular to streams and
wetland areas, will be restored to original grade upon completion, and where it runs
parallel to the stream the construction corridor is greater than 50 ft. from the top of
stream bank. Thus, it is classified as an exempt activity for Neuse River Buffer rules. An
easement was obtained from the adjacent property owner to the northwest of the project
in order to route the sewer line to the nearby sewage treatment plant (see overall site
impact plan property line note). This is why it crosses the beaver impoundment in two
places instead of one.
The USACE's current policy requires applicants to avoid and minimize wetland and
stream channel impacts to the maximum extent practicable and compensatory mitigation
to offset unavoidable losses of waters of the US when impacts exceed the requirements
for notification (0.10 acre). The applicant requested a delineation of wetlands present on
the property prior to site plan development in order to avoid jurisdictional wetlands to the
maximum extent practicable. The road crossing (Impact A) was located in an area where
only stream channel (no wetlands) was impacted. Additionally, the sewer line was
realigned from its initial route in a manner to route it parallel to and 50 ft. from the
stream channel and to reduce jurisdictional wetland and Neuse River Buffer impacts as
minimization measures. The remaining 7.39 acres of jurisdictional wetlands and waters
of the U.S. of higher water quality not impacted by the project will be preserved onsite.
The above factors should be adequate for Corps-required mitigation.
NC-DWQ's current policy does not require mitigation for wetland and stream channel
impacts below 1 acre and 150 linear feet of significant channel. Because the proposed
cumulative impacts resulting from the project do not exceed the aforementioned
thresholds (0.013 acres and 142 linear ft.), S&EC believes that wetland or stream channel
mitigation should not be required by NC-DWQ. Additionally, the impacted buffer area
(0.266 acres) as a result of the road crossing (Impact A) is less than the 1/3 acres and less
than 150 ft. of channel per tributary buffer mitigation threshold, and thus, buffer
mitigation should not be required.
It is important to note that total impervious area onsite is expected to exceed 30%. A
stormwater treatment plan, dated May 41n, 2001, was sent by the John R. McAdams
Company to Todd St. John of the NC-DWQ, prior to and separately from this application.
A copy of the letter of transmittal is attached with this application.
Please call me if you require any additional information or have any questions.
Sincerely,
P C"?
Jim Cooper
Environmental Scientist
Attachments:
Pre-construction (PCN) notification form
USGS Site Vicinity Map
Granville County Soil Survey Map
3 Proposed Wetland Impact Maps (1 overall, 1
Letter of no practical alternative from engineer
Agent Authorization Form
Wetland and upland data forms
NC-DWQ $200 Check (NC-DWQ copy only)
Copy of Stormwater Plan Letter of Transmittal

Kevin Martin
President
for Impact A, 1 for Impact B)

W A T?
,,C7 G
Pre-Construction Notification (PCN) Application Form
For Section 404 and/or Section 10 Nationwide, Regional and General Permits, Section 401
General Water Quality Certifications, and Riparian Buffer and Watershed Buffer Rules
This form is to be used for projects qualifying for any of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers' (USACE)
Nationwide, Regional or General Permits as required by Section 404 of the Clean Water Act and/or
Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act, and for the North Carolina Division of Water Quality's
(DWQ) associated General 401 Water Quality Certifications. This form is also to be used for any
project requiring approval under any Riparian Buffer Rules implemented by the N.C. Division of Water
Quality. This form should not be used if you are requesting an Individual 404 Permit or Individual 401
Water Quality Certification. The USACE Individual Permit application form is available online at
http•//www saw usace army.mil/wetlands/Perm app.htm.
The USACE is the lead regulatory agency. To review the requirements for the use of Nationwide,
Regional or General permits, and to determine which permit applies to your project, please go to the
USACE website at http://www.saw.usace.an-ny.mil/wetlands/regtour.htm, or contact one of the field
offices listed at the end of this application. The website also lists the responsible project manager for
each county in North Carolina and provides additional information regarding the identification and
regulation of wetlands and waters of the U.S.
The DWQ issues a corresponding Certification (General or Individual), and cannot tell the applicant
which 401 Certification will apply until the 404 Permit type has been determined by the USACE.
Applicants are encouraged to visit DWQ's 401/Wetlands Unit website at
http•//h2o.enr.state.nc.us/newetlands to read about current requirements for the 401 Water Quality
Certification Program and to determine whether or not Riparian Buffer Rules are applicable. The
applicant is also advised to read the full text of the General Certification (GC) matching the specific 404
Permit requested. In some cases, written approval for some General Certifications is not required,
provided that the applicant adheres to all conditions of the GC. Applicants lacking access to the internet
should contact DWQ's Central Office in Raleigh at [phone].
Trout Waters Coordination - Special coordination with the North Carolina Wildlife Resources
Commission (NCWRC) is also required for projects occurring in any of North Carolina's twenty-five
counties that contain trout waters. In such cases, the applicant should contact the appropriate NCWRC
regional coordinator (listed by county on the last page of this application).
Page 1 of 13
CAMA Coordination - If the project occurs in any of North Carolina's twenty coastal counties (listed on
the last page of this application) the applicant should also contact the North Carolina Division of Coastal
Management (DCM) at [phone]. DCM will determine whether or not the project involves a
designated Area of Environmental Concern, in which case DCM will act as the lead permitting agency.
In such cases, DCM will require a Coastal Area Management Act (LAMA) Permit and will coordinate
the 404/401 Permits.
USACE Permits - Submit one copy of this form, along with supporting narratives, maps, data forms,
photos, etc. to the applicable USACE Regulatory Field Office (addresses are listed at the end of this
application). Upon receipt of an application, the USACE will determine if the application is complete as
soon as possible, not to exceed 30 days. This PCN form is designed for the convenience of the applicant
to address information, needs for all USACE Nationwide, Regional or General permits, as well as
information required for State authorizations, certifications, and coordination. Fully providing the
information requested on this form will result in a complete application for any of the USACE
Nationwide, Regional or General permits. To review the minimum amount of information that must be
provided for a complete PCN for each USACE Nationwide permit, see Condition 13, 65 Fed.Reg. 12893
(March 9, 2000), available at http•//www saw usace.army.mil/wetlands/nwpfinalFedReg_pdf.
Processing times vary by permit and begin once the application has been determined to be complete.
Please contact the appropriate regulatory field office for specific answers to permit processing periods.
401 Water Quality Certification or Buffer Rules - All information is required unless otherwise stated
as optional. Incomplete applications will be returned. Submit seven collated copies of all USACE
Permit materials to the Division of Water Quality, 401/Wetlands Unit, 1650 Mail Service Center,
Raleigh, NC, 27699-1650. If written approval is required or specifically requested for a 401
Certification, then a non-refundable application fee is required. In brief, if project impacts include less
than one acre of cumulative wetland/water impacts and less than 150 feet cumulative impacts to
streams, then a fee of $200 is required. If either of these thresholds is exceeded, then a fee of $475 is
required. A check made out to the North Carolina Division of Water Quality, with the specific name of
the project or applicant identified, should be stapled to the front of the application package. For more
information, see the DWQ website at http://h2o.ehnr.state.nc.us/ncwctlands/fees.html. The fee must be
attached with the application unless the applicant is a federal agency in which case the check may be
issued from a separate office. In such cases, the project must be identifiable on the U.S. Treasury check
so that it can be credited to the appropriate project. If written approval is sought solely for Buffer Rules,
the application fee does not apply, and the applicant should clearly state (in a cover letter) that only
Buffer Rule approval is sought in writing. Wetlands or waters of the U.S. may not be impacted prior to
issuance or waiver of a Section 401 Water Quality Certification. Upon receipt of a complete application
for a 401 Certification, the Division of Water Quality has 60 days to prepare a written response to the
applicant. This may include a 401 Certification, an on-hold letter pending receipt of additional
requested information, or denial.
Page 2 of 13
Office Use Only: Form Version April 2001
USACE Action ID No. DWQ No. 4 1 0 7 4 5
If any particular item is not applicable to this project, please enter "Not Applicable" or "N/A" rather than
leaving the space blank.
1. Processing
1. Check all of the approval(s) requested for this project:
® Section 404 Permit
? Section 10 Permit
® 401 Water Quality Certification (courtesy notification)
® Riparian or Watershed Buffer Rules
2. Nationwide, Regional or General Permit Number(s) Requested: 39 & 12
3. If this notification is solely a courtesy copy becausewritten approval for the 401 Certification
is not required, check here:
4. If payment into the North Carolina Wetlands Restoration Program (NCWRP) is proposed for
mitigation of impacts (see section VIII - Mitigation), check here: ?
II. Applicant Information
1. Owner/Applicant Information
Name: NWI XX L.P., John Nelley Jr. Partner
Mailing Address: Fourty-Four Business Center, 782 Melrose Ave., Nashville, TN 37211
Telephone Number: (615)-366-6200 Fax Number:
E-mail Address:
2. Agent Information (A signed and dated copy of the Agent Authorization letter must be
attached if the Agent has signatory authority for the owner/applicant.)
Name: Jim Cooper
Company Affiliation: Soil & Environmental Consultants
Mailing Address: 11010 Raven Ridge Rd. Raleigh NC 27614
Telephone Number: (919)-846-5900 Fax Number: (919)-846-9467
E-mail Address: icooperRa sandec com
Page 3 of 13
III. Project Information
Attach a vicinity map clearly showing the location of the property with respect to local
landmarks such as towns, rivers, and roads. Also provide a detailed site plan showing property
boundaries and development plans in relation to surrounding properties. Both the vicinity map
and site plan must include a scale and north arrow. The specific footprints of all buildings,
impervious surfaces, or other facilities must be included. If possible, the maps and plans should
include the appropriate USGS Topographic Quad Map and NRCS Soil Survey with the property
boundaries outlined. Plan drawings, or other maps may be included at the applicant's discretion,
so long as the property is clearly defined. For administrative and distribution purposes, the
USACE requires information to be submitted on sheets no larger than 11 by 17-inch format;
however, DWQ may accept paperwork of any size. DWQ prefers full-size construction
drawings rather than a sequential sheet version of the full-size plans. If full-size plans are
reduced to a small scale such that the final version is illegible, the applicant will be informed that
the project has been placed on hold until decipherable maps are provided.
1. Name of project: Butner Business Park
2. T.I.P. Project Number (NCDOT Only):
3. Property Identification Number (Tax PIN):
4. Location
County: Granville Nearest Town: Butner
Subdivision name (include phase/lot number): N/A
Directions to site (include road numbers, landmarks, etc.): The site is immediately west of I-
85 south of SR 1103 (which is an exit off I-85) in Butner Granville County, NC.
5. Site coordinates, if available (UTM or Lat/Long): 36°07'00" N 78°45'30" W
(Note - If project is linear, such as a road or utility line, attach a sheet that separately lists the
coordinates for each crossing of a distinct waterbody.)
6. Describe the existing land use or condition of the site at the time of this application:
Forested, and/or timbered a rough graded unpaved road system is in place and has been for
many years
7. Property size (acres): approximately 348.8 acres
8. Nearest body of water (stream/river/sound/ocean/lake): Unnamed tributaries to Falls Lake
9. River Basin:
Page 4 of 13
(Note - this must be one of North Carolina's seventeen designated major river basins. The
River Basin map is available at http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/admin/maps/.)
10. Describe the purpose of the proposed work: The proposed project consists of a mixed
industrial/commercial park that will provide employment in the Butner area.
11. List the type of equipment to be used to construct the project: Heavy machinm associated
with the construction of industrial/commercial facilities will be used for this project.
12. Describe the land use in the vicinity of this project: Residential and Forested
IV. Prior Project History
If jurisdictional determinations and/or permits have been requested and/or obtained for this
project (including all prior phases of the same subdivision) in the past, please explain. Include
the USACE Action ID Number, DWQ Project Number, application date, and date permits and
certifications were issued or withdrawn. Provide photocopies of previously issued permits,
certifications or other useful information. Describe previously approved wetland, stream and
buffer impacts, along with associated mitigation (where applicable). If this is a NCDOT project,
list and describe permits issued for prior segments of the same T.I.P. project, along with
construction schedules.
No permits have been applied for nor received for this property (wetland survey will be
submitted as soon as it is received from the surveyors)
V. Future Project Plans
Are any additional permit requests anticipated for this project in the future? If so, describe the
anticipated work, and provide justification for the exclusion of this work from the current
application: Exact development plans for the site are unknown at this time, however, additional
work is expected to take place in upland areas only.
VI. Proposed Impacts to Waters of the United States/Waters of the State
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
wetlands, open water, and stream channels associated with the project. The applicant must also
provide justification for these impacts in Section VII below. All proposed impacts, permanent
Page 5 of 13
and temporary, must be listed herein, and must be clearly identifiable on an accompanying site
plan. All wetlands and waters, and all streams (intermittent and perennial) must be shown on a
delineation map, whether or not impacts are proposed to these systems. Wetland and stream
evaluation and delineation forms should be included as appropriate. Photographs may be
included at the applicant's discretion. If this proposed impact is strictly for wetland or stream
mitigation, list and describe the impact in Section VIII below. If additional space is needed for
listing or description, please attach a separate sheet.
1. Wetland Impacts
Wetland Impact
Site Number
indicate on ma
Type of Impact* Area of
Impact
(acres) Located within
100-year Floodplain**
yes/no Distance to
Nearest Stream
linear feet)
Type of Wetland***
A Road Crossing 0.013 No --- stream channel
B Sewer Line
Crossing 0.207 No --- Beaver pond/marsh

* List each impact separately and identify temporary impacts. Impacts include, but are not limited to: mechanized clearing, grading, till,
excavation, flooding, ditching/drainage, etc. For dams, separately list impacts due to both structure and flooding.
** 100-Year floodplains are identified through the Federal Emergency Management Agency's (FEMA) Flood Insurance Rate Maps
(FIRM), or FEMA-approved local floodplain maps. Maps are available through the FEMA Map Service Center at 1-800-358-9616, or
online at littn://www.fenia.gov.
*** List a wetland type that best describes wetland to be impacted (e.g., freshwater/saltwater marsh, forested wetland, beaver pond,
Carolina Bay, bog, etc.)
List the total acreage (estimated) of existing wetlands on the property: 7.61 (in evaluated
area only)
Total area of wetland impact proposed: 0.220 acres (0.207 acres temporary)
2. Stream Impacts, including all intermittent and perennial streams
Stream Impact
Site Number
indicate on ma
Type of Impact* Length of
Impact
linear feet)
Stream Name** Average Width
of Stream
Before Impact Perennial or
Intermittent?
(please secif )
A Road Crossing 142 ft. UT to Falls Lake 4 Intermittent

Page 6 of 13
* List each impact separately and identify temporary impacts. Impacts include, but are not limited to: culverts and associated riprap,
dams (separately list impacts due to both structure and flooding), relocation (include linear feet before and after, and net loss/gain),
stabilization activities (cement wall, rip-rap, crib wall, gabions, etc.), excavation, ditching/straightening, etc. If stream relocation is
proposed, plans and profiles showing the linear footprint for both the original and relocated streams must be included.
** Stream names can be found on USGS topographic maps. If a stream has no name, list as UT (unnamed tributary) to the nearest
downstream named stream into which it flows. USGS maps are available through the USGS at 1-800-358-9616, or online at
www.usms.gov. Several internet sites also allow direct download and printing of USGS maps (e.g., www.topozone.com,
www.inap-quest.coni, etc.).
Cumulative impacts (linear distance in feet) to all streams on site: 142 ft.
3. Open Water Impacts, including Lakes, Ponds, Estuaries, Sounds, Atlantic Ocean and any
other Water of the U.S.
Open Water Impact
Site Number
indicate on ma
Type of Impact* Area of
Impact
(acres) Name of Waterbody
(if applicable) Type of Waterbody
(lake, pond, estuary, sound,
bay, ocean, etc.)

* List each impact separately and identify temporary impacts. Impacts inclu&, but are not limited to: fill, excavation, dredging,
flooding, drainage, bulkheads, etc.
4. Pond Creation
If construction of a pond is proposed, associated wetland and stream impacts should be
included above in the wetland and stream impact sections. Also, the proposed pond should
be described here and illustrated on any maps included with this application.
Pond to be created in (check all that apply): ® uplands ? stream ? wetlands
Describe the method of construction (e.g., dam/embankment, excavation, installation of
draw-down valve or spillway, etc.): Refer to John R. McAdams Stormwater Plan (see
attached letter of submittal dated 5/4/01 sent to Todd St. John's attention)
Proposed use or purpose of pond (e.g., livestock watering, irrigation, aesthetic, trout pond,
local stormwater requirement, etc.):
Size of watershed draining to pond: Expected pond surface area:
VII. Impact Justification (Avoidance and Minimization)
Specifically describe measures taken to avoid the proposed impacts. It may be useful to provide
information related to site constraints such as topography, building ordinances, accessibility, and
financial viability of the project. The applicant may attach drawings of alternative, lower-impact
site layouts, and explain why these design options were not feasible. Also discuss how impacts
were minimized once the desired site plan was developed. If applicable, discuss construction
techniques to be followed during construction to reduce impacts.
Page 7 of 13
The applicant request a detailed wetland delineation prior to development a site plan in order
to avoid and minimize impacts to wetland and waters of the U.S. The proposed road crossing
was planned and situated in a manner to impact only jurisdictional stream channel without
impacting wetland areas along the stream. The propsed perpendicular sewer line crossing will
result in only temporary impacts to jurisdictional wetland and waters of the U.S, and is at least
80-90 ft from the stream where it runs parallel to the channel. All other wetland areas and
waters of the U.S. were avoided.
VIII. Mitigation
DWQ - In accordance with 15A NCAC 2H .0500, mitigation may be required by the NC
Division of Water Quality for projects involving greater than or equal to one acre of impacts to
freshwater wetlands or greater than or equal to 150 linear feet of total impacts to perennial
streams.
USACE - In accordance with the Final Notice of Issuance and Modification of Nationwide
Permits, published in the Federal Register on March 9, 2000, mitigation will be required when
necessary to ensure that adverse effects to the aquatic environment are minimal. Factors
including size and type of proposed impact and function and relative value of the impacted
aquatic resource will be considered in determining acceptability of appropriate and practicable
mitigation as proposed. Examples of mitigation that may be appropriate and practicable include,
but are not limited to: reducing the size of the project; establishing and maintaining wetland
and/or upland vegetated buffers to protect open waters such as streams; and replacing losses of
aquatic resource functions and values by creating, restoring, enhancing, or preserving similar
functions and values, preferable in the same watershed.
If mitigation is required for this project, a copy of the mitigation plan must be attached in order
for USACE or DWQ to consider the application complete for processing. Any application
lacking a required mitigation plan or NCWRP concurrence shall be placed on hold as
incomplete. An applicant may also choose to review the current guidelines for stream restoration
in DWQ's Draft Technical Guide for Stream Work in North Carolina, available at
http://h2o. enr. state.nc.us/ncwetl ands/strm ?,)ide.html.
Provide a brief description of the proposed mitigation plan. The description should provide
as much information as possible, including, but not limited to: site location (attach directions
and/or map, if offsite), affected stream and river basin, type and amount (acreage/linear feet)
of mitigation proposed (restoration, enhancement, creation, or preservation), a plan view,
preservation mechanism (e.g., deed restrictions, conservation easement, etc.), and a
Page 8 of 13
description of the current site conditions and proposed method of construction. Please attach
a separate sheet if more space is needed.
Impacts to jurisdictional wetlands and waters of the U.S., totaling 0.220 acres (0.207
acres of which are temporM impacts from the sewer line crossing) of wetland impacts and
142 linear ft of stream channel impacts are below NC-DWQ mitigation thresholds.
Therefore no mitigation should be required for the NC-DWQ. Stream channel impacts were
minimized and the road crossing (Impact A only impacts jurisdictional stream channel, no
wetlands will be impacted All other wetlands of higher water quality onsite will be avoided.
We believe the permanent channel impacts are to a Corps-unimportant stream and sewer line
impacts are temporary. Therefore no mitigation beyond avoidance, minimization, and
preservation should be required by the USACE
2. Mitigation may also be made by payment into the North Carolina Wetlands Restoration
Program (NCWRP) with the NCWRP's written agreement. Check the box indicating that
you would like to pay into the NCWRP. Please note that payment into the NCWRP must be
reviewed and approved before it can be used to satisfy mitigation requirements. Applicants
will be notified early in the review process by the 401/Wetlands Unit if payment into the
NCWRP is available as an option. For additional information regarding the application
process for the NCWRP, check the NCWRP website at http://h2o enr state nc us/wM/index.htin If
use of the NCWRP is proposed, please check the appropriate box on page three and provide
the following information:
Amount of stream mitigation requested (linear feet):
Amount of buffer mitigation requested (square feet):
Amount of Riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres):
Amount of Non-riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres):
Amount of Coastal wetland mitigation requested (acres):
IX. Environmental Documentation (DWQ Only)
Does the project involve an expenditure of public funds or the use of public (federal/state/local)
land?
Yes ? No
Page 9 of 13
If yes, does the project require preparation of an environmental document pursuant to the
requirements of the National or North Carolina Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
Note: If you are not sure whether a NEPA/SEPA document is required, call the SEPA
coordinator at [phone] to review current thresholds for environmental documentation.
Yes ? No ?
If yes, has the document review been finalized by the State Clearinghouse? If so, please attach a
copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval letter.
Yes ? No ?
X. Proposed Impacts on Riparian and Watershed Buffers (DWQ Only)
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
required state and local buffers associated with the project. The applicant must also provide
justification for these impacts in Section VII above. All proposed impacts must be listed herein,
and must be clearly identifiable on the accompanying site plan. All buffers must be shown on a
map, whether or not impacts are proposed to the buffers. Correspondence from the DWQ
Regional Office may be included as appropriate. Photographs may also be included at the
applicant's discretion.
Will the project impact protected riparian buffers identified within 15A NCAC 2B .0233
(Meuse), 15A NCAC 2B .0259 (Tar-Pamlico), 15A NCAC 2B .0250 (Randleman Rules and
Water Supply Buffer Requirements), or other (please identify )?
Yes ® No ? If you answered "yes", provide the following information:
Identify the square feet and acreage of impact to each zone of the riparian buffers. If buffer
mitigation is required calculate the required amount of mitigation by applying the buffer
multipliers.
Zone* Impact
(square feet) Multiplier Required
Mitigation
1 8,606 ft.' 3
2 2,972 ft.z 1.5
Total 11,578 ft.2
* Zone 1 extends out 30 feet perpendicular from near bank of channel; Zone 1 extends an
additional 20 feet from the edge of Zone 1.
If buffer mitigation is required, please discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (i.e., Donation
of Property, Conservation Easement, Riparian Buffer Restoration / Enhancement, Preservation or
Payment into the Riparian Buffer Restoration Fund). Please attach all appropriate information as
identified within 15A NCAC 2B .0242 or .0260.
Page 10 of 13
XI. Stormwater (DWQ Only)
Describe impervious acreage (both existing and proposed) versus total acreage on the site.
Discuss stormwater controls proposed in order to protect surface waters and wetlands
downstream from the property.
Impervious acreage onsite is expected to be greater than 30%. A stormwater plan has been
submitted separately from this application to Todd St. John of the NC-DWQ the engineer (the
John R McAdams Company) A copy of the submittal form for the stormwater plan is enclosed
in this application
XII. Sewage Disposal (DWQ Only)
Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of
wastewater generated from the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
Connection to sanitga sewer
XIII. Violations (DWQ Only)
Is this site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500) or any Buffer Rules?
Yes ? No
Is this an after-the-fact permit application?
Yes ? No
XIV. Other Circumstances (Optional):
It is the applicant's responsibility to submit the application sufficiently in advance of desired
construction dates to allow processing time for these permits. However, an applicant may
choose to list constraints associated with construction or sequencing that may impose limits on
work schedules (e.g., draw-down schedules for lakes, dates associated with Endangered and
Threatened Species, accessibility problems, or other issues outside of the applicant's control).
D
Applican Agen ' Signature / v (?Ilw r Date
Page I 1 of 13
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant is provided.)
US Army Corps Of Engineers Field Offices and County Coverage
Asheville Regulatory Field Office Alexander Cherokee Iredell Mitchell Union
US Army Corps of Engineers Avery Clay Jackson Polk Watauga
151 Patton Avenue Buncombe Cleveland Lincoln Rowan Yancey
Room 208 Burke Gaston Macon Rutherford
Asheville, NC 28801-5006 Cabarrus Graham Madison Stanley
Telephone: [phone] Caldwell Haywood McDowell Swain
Fax: [phone] Catawba Henderson Mecklenburg Transylvania
Raleigh Regulatory Field Office Alamance Durham Johnston Rockingham Wilson
US Army Corps Of Engineers Alleghany Edgecombe Lee Stokes Yadkin
6508 Falls of the Neuse Road Ashe Franklin Nash Surry
Suite 120 Caswell Forsyth Northampton Vance
Raleigh, NC 27615 Chatham Granville Orange Wake
Telephone: [phone] Davidson Guilford Person Warren
Fax: [phone] Davie Halifax Randolph Wilkes
Washington Regulatory Field Office Beaufort Currituck Jones Pitt
US Army Corps Of Engineers Bertie Dare Lenoir Tyrrell
Post Office Box 1000 Camden Gates Martin Washington
Washington, NC 27889-1000 Carteret* Green Pamlico Wayne
Telephone: [phone] Chowan Hertford Pasquotank
Fax: [phone] Craven Hyde Perquimans *Croatan National Forest Only
Wilmington Regulatory Field Office Anson Duplin Onslow
US Army Corps Of Engineers Bladen Harnett Pender
Post Office Box 1890 Brunswick Hoke Richmond
Wilmington, NC 28402-1890 Carteret Montgomery Robeson
Telephone: [phone] Columbus Moore Sampson
Fax: [phone] Cumberland New Hanover Scotland
US Fis
US Fish and Wildlife Service
Raleigh Field Office
Post Office Box 33726
Raleigh, NC 27636-3726
Telephone: [phone]
h and Wildlife Service / National N]
US Fish and Wildlife Service
Asheville Field Office
160 Zillicoa Street
Asheville, NC 28801
Telephone: [phone]
arine Fisheries Service
National Marine Fisheries Service
Habitat Conservation Division
Pivers Island
Beaufort, NC 28516
Telephone: [phone]
North Carolina State Agencies
Division of Water Quality
401 Wetlands Unit
1650 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1650
Telephone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Division of Water Quality
Wetlands Restoration Program
1619 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1619
Telephone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
State Historic Preservation Office
Department Of Cultural Resources
4617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-4617
Telephone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Page 12 of 13
CAMA and NC Coastal Counties
Division of Coastal Management Beaufort Chowan Hertford Pasquotank
1638 Mail Service Center Bertie Craven Hyde Pender
Raleigh, NC 27699-1638 Brunswick Currituck New Hanover Perquimans
Telephone: [phone] Camden Dare Onslow Tyrrell
Fax: [phone] Carteret Gates Pamlico Washington
NCWRC and NC Trout Counties
Western Piedmont Region Coordinator
3855 Idlewild Road
Kernersville, NC 27284-9180
Telephone: [phone] '
Mountain Region Coordinator
20830 Great Smoky Mtn. Expressway
Waynesville, NC 28786
Telephone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Alleghany Caldwell Watauga
Ashe Mitchell Wilkes
Avery Stokes
Burke Surry
Buncombe Henderson Polk
Cherokee Jackson Rutherford
Clay Macon Swain
Graham Madison Transylvania
Haywood McDowell Yancey
Page 13 of 13
L
FIGURE 1: USGS SITE VICINITY MAP
.-300 1
32 • • /
6l
J ?
C
Q
1,00
II
V II` U
rry I
?• u 1
II
o ? =
/i
i
VIII
_ - - II V
r ?? J a
1
/350
ankr
'• Op •• 60 . UNITED STATES
t
4
>. w j •
3 '
4'r* ?.
k •.
o` Libr '
r pry.
1
p0
` 110 iDEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
GEOLOGICAL SURVEY
• HENDERSON 27 Ml.
7(
``` ? 3 5r 70300Dm.E, OXFORD 16 Ml.
/ Gar
I
1104
85
Q O I l •/ ° - // ;vim • ? r ? ?? 1? ?
II / i 1 0 ?- ?l`\ `-
31
?__?
? 8 ? /i ??')? ) ?i \._/ /o-:' /? '//?? i •o .329
71
A /-7
FIGURE 2: GRANVILLE COUNTY SOIL SURVEY MAP
U.S. DEPARTMENTOF AGRICUI I
SOIL CONSERVATION SERM
IrB
n

r

CrB
February 27, 2001
STATEMENT OF JUSTIFICATION
Project Name:
Address:
Butner Business Park
S.R. 1103
Granville County, NC
Applicant: NWI XX, LP
C/O Weeks Corporation
782 Melrose Avenue
Nashville, Tennessee 37211
Tract Size:
Unit Count:
348.8 Acres
N/A
Granville County P.I.N: 0876.03-22-9677
The current site plan for this mixed-use business/commercial project has one point of
access. This access is off of SR 1103. The crossing is a point of interest because the
drive penetrates a Neuse River buffer.
Per NCDOT requirements, the access road (Business Park Drive) must be constructed a
minimum of 800 ft from Interstate 85. Business Park Drive will be parallel to the
Interstate. Complying with this requirement will necessitate building the road across the
stream buffer in the location shown (See plan, Buffer Disturbance "A").
Additionally, pockets of wetlands exist between the end of the buffer and I-85 (See
WETLAND AREA 5 and 6 on Sheet 1 of 4). By crossing the stream at the point
suggested, impact to wetlands can be avoided.
81/Z4/2001 15:59 9198ab946i 5 EC
OpY0 002
Soil 8c Envw011 me-nW Consultants 'n e'
rlolo Raven ttidse Rand • pe1?h, N00 ckv in3 Zy414 • >'haa? (919) 844-5'7? • (9t97 946
Wye Pme: www-sammc.cesb
ACENi' AUTJj0%ZATION FORM
All B artks To Be Filled In By The Current Land`" -
John W • Nell Jr • r
Nano: p 27911
Address:. •.-??-?;-s --- - -
Phorte:. ?
Project Name/Description: Ratner $nsineas center, Butner NC
Date: Februar 27, 2001
The Departawnt of the Army
U.S, Army Corps of Engineers, Wflntirgfon District
P.O. Box
Wi?mixtgtnat, NC 29402
Attn:
Field Ofiiae:
Re: Wedands Related Com-ultjng and Permitting
To Whom it May Comcem:
d authorize SOA & pnvirordrtmtal Consultants, Ix?c. to
1, the curtet?t VZOPERM ???, hereby designato art t a?tuatians, to furoish upon re4uest
act in my'behaU as my agent: in ft processing of pew
supplemental information in support of applications, etc. from this day fm ward. The 27 day a:
Fer+,rL?ry 2 1
This nod&ation supersedes any previous( correspondence conceming the agent for this project
XOTICh1 This authot?tian• for HabMty and professional coaztesy reasons, is valiA only for
government officials to enter the property when accompanied by S6:9C stafL You Should call S&EC
to arrange a site meeting poor to visiting the site. N k t x x , G n
aohn H1 iglieU Jr.
print I' operty'Owner's Name
cc: Mr. John Domey
NCDSNR - DWQ, Water Quality Plaramt tg
44M Reedy Creek Road
li , m.,, NC 27607
Proper wnees Sigratum u.?.
cc. mt. Kevin Martin
Sou & Envirozutxtental Consultants, Inc.
bit,,: V au & lam"-
Wetly p?( os/pelzoictiegll?Gug so,VS'?oe Er.iuati ores Oesiee Sep?ie Sy, s gav9ee""11 AtsaaseMtyA
d 8a4&r Evalaatiees Gsd0?' tsadan=erect Spy
Neale 8uin end Wanasbc
W"Wm Branch QlFwes [phone] • (M) 3124= (704) 5-16-39n
f1H? , -
uvnn uA ?0:90
01:40pm From-THE JOHN R MCADAMS COMPANY INC 9193612269 T-569 P.02/02 F-271
a UM JOHN R. MCADAMS CONVANY INC.
'-STTI R OF TRANSMITTAL
"0;; Todd St. John
,._
Division of Water Quality
Environmental Sciences Branch
4401 Reedy Creek Rd,
Raleigh North Carolina 27607
RP; Butner Business Park Water Quality Pond #1
Date: May 4, 2001
** FEDERAL EXPRESS **
Job No.: WKS 98000
am sending you the following item(s):
COPIES DATE NO. DESCRIPTION
3 3 Water Quality Pond Design Calculations
3 3 Accompanying Watershed Maps
g 3 Water Quality Pond Plans and Details

i
These are transmitted as checked below:
7. As requested ?
j For approval
? For review and comment ?
Remarks:
For your use
Copy to: Tim Michael Signed:
FOR INTERNAL USE ONLY
® Copy Letter of Transmittal Onl to File
? Copy Entire Document to File
CIVIL ENGINEERING • LAND PLANNING • SURVEYING
Pd BOX 14005 • Research Triangle Park. NC 2T709 • [phone] • fax [phone]
www,johnrmcadams.com
Wetland Delineation Performed By
11010 Raven Ridge Road
Raleigh, North Carolina 27614
[phone]
Soil & Environmental Consultants, Inc.
231 16th Avenue NE
Hickory, North Carolina 28601
[phone]
DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
ject/Site: Butner Business Park/Proiect # 5422
P Date: 8/18/00
ro
Applicant/Owner: John R. McAdams
ator: K Martin T Preuninger
vesti
I County: Granville
State: NC
g
n
Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site? x Yes No Community ID: Beaver Impoundment
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation)? -Yes x No Transect ID: wetland
Is the area a potential Problem Area? _Yes x No Plot ID: 50 feet from flap 216
If needed, explain on reverse.
\/G!!CTATIAN

ecies
nt Plant S
i
D Stratum Indicator Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator
p
om
na
1. Boehmaria cylindrica HERB FACW+ 9.
2. Diodia virginiana HERB FACW 10.
3. Microstegium vimineum
4. Hibiscus moscheutos HERB
HERB FAC
OBL 11.
12.
5. Polygonum sagittatum
6. HERB OBL 13.
14.
7 15.
8. 16.

Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW,or FAC
(excluding FAG :
100%

Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Recorded Data: Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
-
Stream, Lake or Tide Gauge Primary Indicators:
-
Aerial Photographs X Inundated
-
Other x Saturated in Upper 12 Inches
-Water Marks
x No Recorded Data Available -Drift Lines
Sediment Deposits
_L Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Field Observations: Secondary Indicators (2 or more required):
Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 Inches
Depth of Surface Water: 0-24" (in.) x Water-Stained Leaves
-Local Soil Survey Data
Depth to Free Water in Pit: NA (in.) _FAC-Neutral Test
-Other (Explain in Remarks)
Depth to Saturated Soil: 0 (in.)
Remarks:
Wetland Delineation Performed By: Soil & Environmental Consultants, Inc.
11010 Raven Ridge Road 231 16th Avenue NE
Raleigh, North Carolina 27614 Hickory, North Carolina 28601
[phone] [phone]
Project/Site: Butner Business Park/Proiect # 5422 Plot ID: wetland near flag 216

[[Map Unit Name Drainage Class: poorly
(Series and Phase): Picture Field Observations
Taxonomy (Subgroup): Vertic Argiaguoll Confirm Mapped Type? X Yes - No
Profile Description:
Depth Matrix Color Mottle Color Mottle Texture, Concretions,
(inches) Horizon (Munsell Moist) (Munsell Moist) Abundance/Contrast Structure, etc.
0-11 A 10YR 3/2 Clay loam
11-18+ Bt 10YR 4/1 7.5YR5/6 Common/prominent Clay
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Histosol x Concretions
_
Histic Epipedon -High Organic Content in Surface Layer i n Sandy Soils
_
Sulfidic Odor Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
x Aquic Moisture Regime Listed on Local Hydric Soils List
Reducing Conditions x Listed on National Hydric Soils List
x Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors -Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
1. ir-r? wunc? ncT0 IAIAIATlf%Kl
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? x Yes _No Is this sampling point within a wetland?
Wetland Hydrology Present? x Yes _No X Yes
Hydric Soils Present? x Yes No Q 5G IL SC
Remarks:
?'.
®?0
`??j?, r 1 Qg3
\F?C3RTN
Wetland Delineation Performed By: Soil & Environmental Consultants, Inc.
11010 Raven Ridge Road 231 16th Avenue NE
Raleigh, North Carolina 27614 Hickory, North Carolina 28601
[phone] [phone]
DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
Project/Site: Butner Business Park/Proiect # 5422 Date: 8/18/00
Applicant/Owner: John R. McAdams County: Granville
Investigator: K. Martin, T. Preunincler State: NC
Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site? x Yes No Community ID: Mixed Pine/Oak
is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation)? _Yes -x No Transect ID: upland
Is the area a potential Problem Area? _Yes x No Plot ID: 50 feet from flap 216
If needed, explain on reverse.
VEGETATION
Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator
1. Pinus taeda TREE FAC 9.
2. Juniperus virginiana TREE FACU- 10.
3. Morus rubra SHRUB FAC 11.
4. Ulmus rubra SAPLING FAC 12.
5. Cornus florida SHRUB FACU 13.
6. Carya glabra SAPLING FACU 14.
7. Vtis rotundifolia VINE FAC 15.
8. Lonicera sem evirens VINE FAC 16.
Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW,or FAC
(excluding FAC- : 63%
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
-Recorded Data: Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
-Stream, Lake or Tide Gauge Primary Indicators:
-Aerial Photographs -inundated
-Other -Saturated in Upper 12 Inches
-Water Marks
x No Recorded Data Available -Drift Lines
-Sediment Deposits
-Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Field Observations: Secondary Indicators (2 or more required):
-Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 Inches
Depth of Surface Water: NA (in.) _Water-Stained Leaves
Local Soil Survey Data
Depth to Free Water in Pit: NA (in.) _FAC-Neutral Test
-Other (Explain in Remarks)
Depth to Saturated Soil: >12 (in.)
Remarks:
Wetland Delineation Performed By: Soil & Environmental Consultants, Inc.
11010 Raven Ridge Road 231 16th Avenue NE
Raleigh, North Carolina 27614 Hickory, North Carolina 28601
[phone] [phone]
Project/Site: Butner Business Park/Proiect # 5422 Plot ID: upland, near flag 216
Still S
Map Unit Name Drainage Class: Poorly
(Series and Phase): Picture Field Observations
Taxonomy (Subgroup): Vertic Argiaguoll Confirm Mapped Type? x Yes - No
Profile Description:
Depth Matrix Color Mottle Color Mottle Texture, Concretions,
(inches) Horizon (Munsell Moist) (Munsell Moist) Abundance/Contrast Structure, etc.
0-11 A 10YR 3/2 Clay loam
11-18+ Bt 10YR 4/1 7.5YR5/6 Common/prominent Clay
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Histosol x Concretions
_
_Histic Epipedon -High Organic Content in Surface Layer i n Sandy Soils
Sulfidic Odor Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
x Aquic Moisture Regime gListed on Local Hydric Soils List
Reducing Conditions x Listed on National Hydric Soils List
x Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors -Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
WETLANDS DETERMINATION
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? x Yes No Is this sampling point within a wetland?
Wetland Hydrology Present? -Yes x No -Yes x No
Hydric Soils Present? x Yes _No
Remarks: SOIL SC
C
.

°FNOr?TH cps

z?
m
7 D
W ,.
o
Z .D
.j
vv
21 o
?..? 4 U?` a

/V
y 1 1 11 a T
-

O
O C 1 r M?
O
r
D ?
Z
t?

o
m m
D
?v

m Z'D
z
?g
B?yN
oA

PROIEpT N0. YJK' 96600
PnZNAMEi vuNCSg?OZO,D c
CF4 BUTNER BUSINESS PARK
'9CiLEt ,?„ ?UV?.
s
D"?` 4262GiY! NORTH CAROLINA
SHEET 1 OF 3.,o
TH JOHN R. McADAMS ,
Elf COMPANY, INC.
sxc [rtI?1G?Iht?M1Yf4?1tS?!lt1hV?Y0kt?`
RSSEAIFC9 'fR1ANdLE P?RK. NG
P.O.60X`14046 21P 2"00-4006`
(9i9? Y>tt1?6000

-10AC
Dg D
w o
w m
N
.;%'7;>r,>,.':,;;!:,,•?:K,.'.;.;:;+rr;i?•1.;!• I III ?'4?'`"II111 ,,, °',»,.«??•?„?""?•,??
?!? I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ° """^- ?? ?
?7 I I I I• I' I I I I I I I I I I I I I ?'"" """Y d
? 1 1 1 1 1 1 i I I I I I I I
I I I I I I I I I I ?'I I f\ `?, \
I I ( I I I I ''( I I I I I I I I l?
I I I I I I I I i I I I I I I I . ?1:. ?. ,;? Z
I I I I I I I/I I I I I I I I I I ?
1 1 1 1 1 1 I I I I i I I I I '• •' '•?,?,
\ 11 J 1 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I '?%?'?'?ti?'F'•;'."••; Z.
• P ? I I I I I I I I 1 1 I I I I I I I ??";?.•'„?t'••' ' Z
I I I I I I I I I I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 !;}:,y, r:'?,••. rn
? t l I J I h I I I I I ', •••s•G•::•.•? ? r,,ir ?/r12
I I I I I I I I I I I I I '•;,;?•h•••
I I I I I I I I I I I I I I'
\ I I I I I 1 1 I 11 I I I I I +,,;'?!!•.;!;;"? p A
\ I I I I 1 'I I I d f l I I I I I, ;, =•, ?
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I l t I I I I I I I I I I I •!• ?•?' m 3 `??
•\ rrt?,y,l. I I I I I I I 1 1 1 i I I I ? I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 lai IIII 1 1 1 1 1 1 I ,•?,:.'?.` Y? v '6
1 y:;.?i'•,, I I I I I I I I I I I I I} •.,; :.+' •• Cy,•
;• ?.: •.'',',. •, I i l f' I I I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I D
:'::+,,:I< r.;=':: •. I d' I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 'I I I I I •}?'t? _
\ ?. ;% ". I i I I I I I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 oQ ;rn
';• .?•??•:?•.',.,,. t!,' i t I I I i t 1 1 I, 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 ?? II
,? •;• .1^• .: ,.?.;?, •.x, 11•'.:. I I I I I I I I 1 1 1 I I I I I I I I I IIII I
''.. r,?, .,"y?T?;i.:.,„'.,.•y,,a 1 1 1 1 1 1 III 1 1 I I I I. I I I I I I I ? ? '?'
'' I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I ??? ?.
:'•°•' ?• ;' I I I I I I I I I I I I. I' I I 1 Ul
1 1 1 i 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I I I p (??} N
'''r• " I I I I I I I I I I I 1 1 1 I I I I
?^ ? I I I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I I I I I I ???
,•." ?. 11 11111111 11111Ii1i1i11 I I i IIII iIt Iliiill N
1J .?'' I l ly 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I I I I 'r1
\ I I I I I I I I , a„• I I I I I I ?
1 ? ,.r'"`+ 1 I 1 I 1 1 I Y •,r',?,r;: I 1 1 I 11 ? 1 t I I III \„ ?
,..r '? i I ''' "•?''`i'? III 1 1 I I ilr.I. 1
,e'" ? .X•. :T:•'<,,' 3 ',i I I I I I I I I I I I I'1 I,I \
vs :+: ;'r°' ; .1 '111. I I 1 I I I 1 III I
?? ,y.,s,y?l.I,, ''?..,.,'s. ??.'?;:t j I i I i I i i 1 1 I I
,.any., ,;°t : •fy,!•;• \
11 ml,
w".•w° ;; 'Iii. ?.J?:,ib ,
G' x. S#.i. 4. d 3•.
s'a xxx. \
-fib
o H
1
II Cn C7 ? 4?,.. z 'fzjiy
,lYtii 1
o cn `` l?f.? r i
C?
n
..? b5k2
I I
rn
y 1
Gyx?
?.x.. ,... ?? ! SHEET 2 OF 3
PROlU NO, sl nr[: y?Yi k]/tirl?
® 7vV V..
? raaraAx>r? WKS9?OEXD1!
ry scAte, ; ? « 3t?i
DAM
BUTNER BUSINESS PARK I L?
NORTH CAROLINA
(919)
BUTNER BUSINESS PARK
scmxi
1 Q30,
mm"? NORTH CAROLINA
McA;DAMS`
qc.
tRS
roe
A
E
WATER QUALITY TY POND 1
BUTNER, NORTH PROJECT NO. VV SITE OWNER' CAROLINA
WKS-98000
DRAWING LISP
G 1-WA1ER QUALITY POND 1
C-2- WATER QUALITY 1 DETAILS
.P
j eu N~/ NWIXXLP
/ s 782 MELROSE AVE o~ o NASFIVII.LE, TENNESSE w !~VEDiLJE
SSEE 37211
0
w
1' v
P
~ 1ti
~
~5 15
oa~M~•E THE JOHN R. McADAMS
VICINPIY MAP COMPANY, INC. ~s
NT'S
~~0.~~~ CN!_iAiFFAC /PT~NNG`FC /CLiRVFVl1RC ~~~/d'..~.. 'i\~~?
Z H L' 1\U11\LL1'6 AJ/ 1 iLCS1IIILJL'Wki i.1 VaV / L 1 W.JLVk! JtfiL
LL 25337 c
O O O
m m cn RESEARCH TRIANGLE PARK NC cIt
Y 2 B VT. MI~~~o• _4 27709 14005 ZIP , „ [phone]
Cr) Y
3
D C co
J FINAL DESIGN - NOT RELEASED FOR CONSTRUCTION
X

j r
~ ? Y ~ ~
1 1 1 t
r ~ j E !
f f ~ 1 ~ ~ w
1 I ~ ~ y j
~ U
ti. ~ ~ ~
o coa ~ ~ M-1 z ~
\ j ~ \ r ~ o
4~ ~ ' I x .a ~ x ~
~ ~ ti` \ ~ ~ ~ ~ va ,
1,, ~
~ ~ i f ~ ~ a Q a W ~ aN . M"J, t9
~ ~ ~ I
`^d i ~ r', i(~ : Q
\ W 0' Q a xo',o
~ ~ i \ ~ t 4 ~ F d' ~ Q ..r t ~ t
\ ~ \ I ~ ~ ~ x ~
1 W U o c"1 ;W ~
~ i ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
O ~ I ~ Z w ~
i ~ ~ E i r: W t'~ G.~ 1
`4 i ~y~,uuup~
~ ~ ? ~ 1 ~ ~ i
~ ~ ' ' 'I ~ ~ ti
~ ~ S 1 1 a~ ~ ~ SERL
~ y ~ 4 ~ ti 2 49 i5 ~
y ! 1 } ~ ' N~
• M
~ ~ ~ ~ S ~ !I{II ~ i~
\ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
~ NSF 1 ~
RUFFIN WOODY ~ I 1 ~ 1
TRACT 11 ~ ~ ~t.
P.B. 5 PG. 21 / ~ i 1 r r j ~ p 1 / ~ f i
~ ~ ~ ~ \ ~ ~ ~ 1 fit, '"y
? ~ 1 r ~ ~ r
?r z ~ j ! ~ ~ ~
r j ~ ' 1 ~ ~ ti Z
i 1 ~ ~ ~ / Q / ~ s,. {n
~ f.. ~ 1 ~ \
~ ~ " ~ ~ 1 r ~ ~ ~ lx ,
~ ,r / t
t ~ ~ i ~ ~fj Jr ~
t l 'k' ~
J ~ l ' , j ,l ti ~ ~ / ~ .1
~ 1 i r 1 % '
' f / ,,,,,f ,a ~ ~ ,-t ~
l ~ i l ~ ! R ~
i 1 / t ~ { ~ ~ M
~ l ) ~ ~ j ~ m'"f ~ Z W W ~
~ f M. wy
/ W Fi ~ ~ ~ z
~ , \ ~ ~ ( ti ~ 'p ~ 4 ~ H ,
~ I ~ 'a i ~ ~
1 !
t ~ f {@ ~ 1 [ ~
1 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
/ ~ ~ I ~ ~ i ~
. t ~ 7
1 ! a
• w ~
~ ~ 1 ~ ~ o
. ~
l % ~ ` 1 ~ ~
% ' ~ 7 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
I
I ~ _ 1 ~ I t ~
/ r~ i ~ f •~1
!r ~ t -w Uti ~ 1,
J' FOREBAY
1~ATER uA~iTY POND
1 ~ 6' ~ RISER (SEE DETAIL) = 348.00 ` CREST ELEV. = 349.90 ~ `
~ ))1 11II ~ ~ ~ ~ f ~ ~
F J+Z k.
~ti f ) 344 ( ~ 1
~ ELF 0 6:1 12' WIDE AQUATIC SH ~ .w
~ ~ ~ 80 LF 36 0-RING RCP ( 1 0 0.94x t . ~ ,
~ ~ I
~ 1 ~ PROPOSED 10' y~pE MIN.) ~ 0 H
PUMP ( ERM = 354. ( ~ ~ STATION TOp OF B ~ ` ~
i f ~ `f 350 F~
I ~ f ~ ~ ~ ~
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 1 o a s ~ ~ z
~ ! u t ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 30 S.S.
o Y ~ ~ EASEMENT
m - FES , ~ f - - - - - - - - INV. = 341.25 ~ - - - - - . , ,
x ~ c-
. M~
. ~ `
. ~ R N _ ~ - ..r---- _ - ~ ~ - -
ter„ . 'ti ~ . ~ ~
N ~ .r .r • ~ i
ti ' ~ ~ ~ . ~ ~
v ~ N OT C• B RP-RAP o r ~ - + ( !
T ~ r • { / i '
~ ~ (XTENR VELOCI f C' D}SSIPAT •BEY ND ' r"° ~ • ~ I.
L f 'u"^'.w ~ ry(
. ' . ~ ~ ! - ~ pBdJBCi' xo. WKS•~98000
s~ ~ i• ~ ~ • . ~ rn~na~: WK PND.DWG
• . ' ANDS . I ~ ~ 1 S98
~ m ~ ~
~ Y ~ . . ~ DIES • ~ ~ 1~
j ~ ~ J ~ . _
H .r .~r _ scei E: 1 401
LL.
o A r f 05-03-O1
co f rn r
Y 711 SHEET NO. C-1
D - `f
aMcADAMS FINAL DESIGN - NOT RELEASED FOR CONSTRUCTION
X

N H ULE SEEDBED PREPARATION TEMPORARY SEEDI G SC ED
AN NT SEEDING SCHEDULE PERM E
S ~q~ DAB ,gam 1.) CHISEL COMPACTED AREAS AND SPREAD TOPSOiI 3 INCHES DEEP OVER ADVERSE SOIL CONDfTIONS, IF AVAILABLE.
AUG 25 - OCT. (BEST) TALL FESCUE 200 LBS/AC JAN 1 -MAY 1 RYE (GRAIN) t2o LBS/AC 2.) RIP THE ENTIRE AREA TO 6 INCHES DEPTH.
FEB. -APR 1S (POSSIBLE) KOBE LESPEq:IA 50 LBS/AC 3.} REMOVE ALL LOSE ROCK, ROOTS, AND OTHER OBSTRUCTIONS
MAY 1 - AUG 15 GERMAN MILLET 40 Les/AC LEAVING SURFACE REASONABLY SMOOTH AND UNIFORM.
GROUND AGRK;ULTURAL UEMESTONERAND 1000 LB/ACRE' 10R 10 P 0 FERTIUZER~~ AUG is -DEC 30 RYE (GRAIN) t2o LBS/AC 4.) APPLY AGRICULTURAL LIME, FERTILIZER, AND }SUPERPHOSPHATE UNIFORMLY AND MIX WITH SOIL (SEE BELOW
IrltiCtl ~IL.ayIEN~QS 5.) CONTINUE TILLAGE UNTIL AWELL-PULVERIZED, FIRM OUTLET STRUCTURE • 10' {MIN.)
APPLY 4000 LB/AC STRAW. ANCNOR STRAW BY TACKING WRH ASPHALT, NETTING, SEE DETAIL UJ ~ O
OR A MULCH ANCHORING TOOL A qSK WrtH BLADES SET NEARLY STRAIGHT CAN FOLLOW RECOMMENDATIONS OF SOIL TESTS OR APPLY 2,000 LB/AC GROUND REASONABLY UNIFORM SEEDBED IS PREPARED 4 TO 6 INCHES DEEP. TOP OF BERM EL. 354.00 (MIN) BE USED AS A MULCH ANCHORING TOOL. AGRICULTURE LIMESTONE AND 150 LB/AC 10-10-10 FERTILIZER (FROM AUG is - oEC 30, INCREASE 10-10-10 FERTILIZER TO 1000 LB/AC). 6.) SEED ON A FRESHLY PREPARED SEEDBED AND COVER ' O O HANDWHEEL y, C' e)t
Ldt~tlEtlCd; EL. 352.40 12'W AQUATIC SHELF AT M..1 W Z 1 ~ p 6:1 SLOPE EL. 346.00
INSPECT AND REPAIR MULCH FREQUENTLY. REFERBUZE IN LATE MINTER OF THE 1r~1Ctl AC STRAW. ANCHOR STRAW BY TACKING WITH ASPHALT, NETTING, 7.) MULCH IMMEDIATELY AFTER SEEDING AND ANCHOR MULCH. FOLLOWING YEAR; USE SOIL TESTS OR APPLY 150 LB/ACRE 10-10-10. MOW APPIr 4000 TO 348.00 SECTION ~ x, p
REGULARLY TO A HEIGHT OF 2-4 INCHES. OR A MULCH ANCHORING TOOL. A qSK WITH BLADES SEf NEARLY STRAIGHT CAN 8. INSPECT All SEEDED AREAS AND MAKE NECESSARY REPAIRS OR BE USED AS A MULCH ANCHOR~lG TOOL } TOP OF RISER EL. 349.90 .1 ~
18165E.gd~S RESEEDINGS WITHIN THE PLANTING SEASON, IF P05SIBLE• IF BETWEEN MAY 1 AND AUG. 15, AOD 15 LB/ACRE SUDANGRASS OR 10 LB/ACRE 11~l88GE STAND SHOULD BE OVER 60% DAMAGED, REESTABLISH FOLLOWING ~ ~ ' ~ p+ U7 Oa
GERMAN MILLET. BEFORE MAY 1, OR AFTER AUG. 15, ADO 40 LB/ACRE RYE (GRNN). JAN 1 - AUC 15: REFERTILRE IF GROWTH IS NOT FULLY ADEQUATE. ORIGINAL LIME, FERTILIZER AND SEEDING RATES. RESEED, REFERTILIZE. AND MULCH IMMEDIATELY O a,
FoLLOwINC EROSION oR OTHER DAMAGE. SEED LIGHTLY WITH SEEDING EQUIPMENT OR CULTIPACK AFTER SEEDING. NON-WOVEN GEOTEXTILE FABRIC J•~ 36" FES L>:1 a N SHALL BE PLACED AROUND EACH ~ ~y ~ (3
9.) CONSULT CONSERVATION INSPECTOR ON MAINTENANCE TREATMENT NORMAL POOL EL. 348,00 Q Auc t5 -DEC 30: REPAR ANO REFERfIUZE DAMAGED AREAS IMMEOUTELr• AND FERTILIZATION AFTER PERMANENT COVER IS ESTABLISHED. W, O JOINT OF RCP BARREL IN 2' WIDE - ~ ~ p
TOP DRESS WITH 50 LB/AC OF NRROGEN IN MARCH. - IF R IS NECESSARY TO EXTEND TEMPORARY COVER BEYOND UPPER INV. PVC SIPHONS - 1 STRIPS CENTERED ON JOINT. BARREL INV. OUT 341.25 r~~ ~ p p 6 M~+~i ~ O Q
JUNE 15, OVERSEER N1TH 50 LB/AC KOBE LESPEDEZA IN LATE FEBRUARY OR EARLY MARCH. • $ee Seasonoi opplicotion schedule Q`~~'~~' BARREL INV. Ul- l
4 LF 4" DIA. INVERTED ~ IN=342.00 VELOCITY DISSIPATOR ~ x' "'1
PVC SIPHON N T A " "RIP-RAP ~ U ~ ~ ' CDO CL SS B , W O M
35'L x 2TW x 22"1HK, ~ W
POND INV. EL. 342.00 80 LF 36" 0-RING RCP @ 0.94 CL. III RCP ~ (n ( ) ' Z WO
0 0 0 0 o r w
)o~Qo~oQp`o,~~p'o,~~}p0 0 0~q~~
DRAIN TRASH GUARD 1 1 )0~0~4~ono(1o ¢~en~ ~~{Illlll3pt
(SEE DETAIL) 1 1 VA ~~r6 Rp o p~' E~1 'y
8" DIP DRAIN A Tl- P ARS X3 : ~ OF' p~ '9 4 N SEE COLL ( ) ~ Q-
SEEP COLLARS TO BE SPACED ~ Q ~
B' DUl PLUG VALVE (SEE OUTLET STRUCTURE AT 20,0' O.C. (SEE OETAII) SEAL w 4J4~7~
9.37 Fi 0 REPAR RING IAATER4U. SPECIFlCATIONS) ~ F `
8 FT 4 REBAR RING FES 6 Fi 4 REBAR RING KEY TRENCH r ~ NE (SEE BERM SOIL AND 5' FT. MIN.
CONCRETE ANTI-FLOTATION BLOCK .OCK COMPACTION SPECIFICATIONS) ~ AIL fl3l /
CDOT CLASS "B" RIP-RAP 2 FT (SEE OUTLET STRUCTURE DETAIL) 35'Lx27'Wx22" THK.
36" 0-RING RCP
EL. 349.90 (TOP OF RISER) t WATERTIGHT SEAL TO BE PROVIDED
A A 1 Ff. AT RISER/BARREL INTERFACE
~4 REBAR
(TYP.) 4 REBAR
~ a - N 1.1 FT ' ° (N.T.S.)
(TYP J 0
5
s' wI~E POND OUTLET STRUCTURE NOTES: w ES: x
ELEVATION VIEW NOTES:
FES NTS 1. 36" RCP OUTLET BARREL SHALL BE CLASS III RCP, MODIFIED BELL 35 FT. CONFINED 0-RING RUBBER GASKET JOINTS MEETING ASTM C-443 AN[ CP, MODIFIED BELL AND SPIGOT, ASTM C76. THE JOINTS SHALL BE ASTM C-443 AND ASTM C-361. 1. CONCRETE FOR COLLARS SHALL BE 3000 PSI (MIN.) 28 DAY
NOTE: ALL REPAR TO BE ~4 REBAR 2. THE MANHOLE OUTLET RISERS SHALL BE 6' LD., MEETING ASTM G STRENGTH MEETING ASTM C-478R dc, AASHTO M-199 MONOLITHIC BASE. THE MANHOLE
PLAN GALVANIZED WITH A BITUMINOUS COATING JOINTS SHALL BE ASTM C-343 RUBBER CASKET JOINTS. MANHOLE J~ PREVENT SEPARATION. )INTS. MANHOLE JOINTS SHALL BE SECURELY ANCHORED TOGETHER TO 2. COLLARS SHALL BE CONNECTED TO 36" RCP WITH A WATER TIGHT
6 FT. DWJETER 3. OUTLET STRUCTURES SHALL 8E PROVIDED WITH STEPS i'-2' ON CI JOINT. STEPS i'-2" ON CENTER, STEPS
MANHOLE RISER SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH NCDOT STD. 840.66. 36" 0-RING 36. 3. COLLARS SHALL BE SPACED ALONG BARREL AT 20.0' O.C.
RCP 4. CONCRETE ANTI-FLOTATION BLOCK SHALL BE INTEGRALLY ATTACHE P2: TEGRALLY ATTACHED TO RISER BASE TO PREVENT RISER/BLOCK W
SEPERAl10N, OR PRECAST AS THE EXTENDED BASE OF THE MANHOLE OF THE MANHOLE DURING FABRICATION. M 2.00' MIN PROJECTION ~
III zz» LAYER OF CLA55 °e" OUTLET STRUCTURE MATERIAL SPECIFICATI~ - I I I I I I -I I~ RIP-RAP TIN ~ w SPECIFICA 0 S. 6• G~ w ;w
_ 1. POND DRAWDOWN IS VIA AN 8" PLUG VALVE. THE VALVE SHALL E - 4 FILTER BLANKET ~I - fHE VALVE SHALL BEAM&H SME 820 X-CENTRIC VALVE
- - - OR APPR A . I IN DANCE WITH AWWA C OVER EQU L THIS VALVES ACCOR ~ I I ~ , ~ TOP OF OUTLET STRUCTURE 'AA A HANOWHEEL (5EE DETAIL). WCE WITH AWWA C-504 SEC. 5.5, AND SHALL BE OPERABLE FROM ~ W w DETAIL).
~ 4
SECTION A-A 10~ (iYP.) 2. ALL POURED CONCRETE ".•.4A11. BE YNWUM 3000 PSI (28 DAY) UN aH ~0 PSI 28 DAY UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. ~ W ( ) : a
Filter blanket 3. THE INVERTED SIPHON(S) xIALL BE 4 LF-4 NCH OIAl1ETER SCH. ~ DIAMETER SCH. 40 PYC PIPE, ASTM D 1185, - - W
(SEE NOTE) 4. GEOTEXTILE FABRIC FOR TlIE 36 INCH OUTLET BARREL JOINTS AND ~4 REPAR 4553 POLYPROPYIJ:NIE NON-WOVEN NEDLE PUNCHED OR APPROVED E fARREI JOINTS AND SEEPAGE DIAPHRAGM SHALL BE AMOCO S1YLE 36"0 0-RING 36"4 :D OR APPROVED EQUAL (NON-WOVEN FABRIC) n RCP 0-RING O.D. ~ 45.5' ~
WELDED (TYP.) ~ RCP ~ it
1. A FILTER BLANKET IS TO BE INSTALLED (SEE NOTE) BETWEEN THE RIPRAP AND SOIL BERM SOIL AND COMPACTION SPECIFICATI{ ATI N - - ~PECIFIC 0 S: ~
FOUNDATION. THE FILTER BLANKET WILL z
6 FT I REBAR RING 1. ALL FILL SOILS FOR BERM SECTION SHALL BE CLEAN, IMPERMf CONSIST OF A MINIMUM 4 THICK LAYER OF STANDARD PROCTOR MAXIMUM DRY DENSITY, AT OPTIMUM MCdSTI ~E CLEAN, IMPERMEABLE MATERIAL AND COMPACTED TO AT LEAST 95X , • .T OPTIMUM MOISTURE CONTENT. NO BLASTED MATERIALS SHALL BE
STONE NCDOT llll57 UNDERLAIN WITH MIRAFI 8 FT 4 REPAR RING USED IN THE EMBANKMENT CONSTRUCTION. SOILS SHALL NOT EXI ( Tf ) CHARACTERISTICS. LS SHALL NOT EXHIBIT SIGNIFICANT SHRINK/SWELL OR DISPERSIVE ~ l ' w
FILTER WEAVE 700 OR APPROVED 9.37 FT ~ REBAR RING
EQUIVALENT 2. IN ALL FILL AREAS OF THE BERM, A SOILS COMPACTION TEST PER VERTICAL FOOT OF FlLL. COMPAC110N TEST SHALL BE CONDUCTED EACH 2500 SQUARE FEET 0
4.68' TI- P AR CONCRETE AN SEE COLL
2. EXTEND DISSIPATOR BEYOND SANITARY 3. A KEY TRENCH IS TO BE PROVIDED IN ALL FILL AREAS. TRENT FILL AREAS. TRENCH TO EXTEND A MINIMUM OF FIVE FEET BELOW KEY TRENCH SHALL MEET ALL REQUIREMENTS OF ~It ABOVE. (NTS)
SEWER. EXISTING GRADE. SOILS AND COMPACTION FOR KEY TRENCH SHAT PLAN VIEW 4. NO TREES OF ANY TYPE MAY BE LOCATED ON THE BERM SEC ON THE BERM SECTION.
NTS
5. IF ROCK THAT WOULD REQUIRE BLASTING FOR REMOVAL IS E KEY TRENCH, CONTACT ENGINEER IMMEDIATELY. 'OR REMOVAL IS ENCOUNTERED DURING EXCAVATION FOR THE
A - NDEFINED CHANNEL T TT FAT ARE U PIP OU LE 0 L E z oy
NTS a ice=
STATEMENT OF RESPONSIBILITY: AS 1ND1G1TED 01 PLANS WJC7l7V 9' ~~Val=Z
~4 REBAR TRASH RACK (A80VE) ALL REQUIRED MAINTENANCE AND INSPECTIONS OF THIS FACILITY SHA THIS FACILITY SHALL BE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF NWI XX LP. A ~ FACE ~ WALL ~uao~
HANDWHEEL EL 352.40 SCHEDULE OF MAINTENANCE ITEMS MAY BE FOUND WITHIN THE MAIN11 WITHIN THE MAINTENANCE ANO INSPECTION PLAN FOR BUTNER BUSINESS ~ S 1-=~ZJ ~~,~o¢ 0
NOTES: ANCHOR TRASH RACK TO MANHOLE WALL WITH FOUR EQUALLY PARK WATER QUALITY POND 1. SPACED HOT-DIPPED GALVANIZED STEEL CLAMPS. EACH CLAMP x ~ ZpyO:
1. MANHOLE STEPS TO BE PROVIDED TRASH RACK ATTACHED TO MANHOLE RISER BY 2-4'x1/4' CONCRETE ANCHOR AT 1'-2" O.C. (SEE DETAIL) BOLTS EACH CLAMP TO BE COATED W/ A BffUMINOUS COATING. S'~ ~E k-BARS d, 1 q
2. STEPS SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE PRECAST REINFORCED CONCRETE A
WRH NCDOT STD. 840.66 a PLAN ~ b >P' ~
MANHOLE SECTION TRASH RACK (SEE DETAIL) f00TING W uF EDxsT. loulT Is usEO~ DOWEL J (n O
EL. 349.90 (1'OP OF RISER G x c END ELEVATION HAR 'X' o Z~ 3 t` 0'' W Fa
vi W x ~ ~ rn
DWELS a ENwAU WITH REIHFORLY:D t[NCIETE PIPE ,Zi 0 j ~ PIPE SWGLF PIPE DWNLE PIPE Q W U C+
2' 2' I I I ~ I ~ D1A lY If•• N' 3C 3A' 12' 1Y 1Y lB' 21. 30' 36' 4E' IB'
1-4' DIA. SCH. 40 ASTM D1785) INV RTED SIPHON I I I I eaRS 'z' ~z' 'z' •N' Y. 'x' r. 'N• 'N' 'x' 'N• •N• Y. x' r. a J w 1 (n I _ _ I G D7Y. 2 2 3 3 1 1 S 2 2 3 3 1 1 S q -1 (Z W " X 4" 6/6 WELDED WIRE FABRIC M YTY. - - 2 - Y 1 I R R E 2 E 3 2 Q 4~ d
4' LONG WATER TIGHT SEAL EACH SIDE & TOP) G QTY. 2 2 3 3 1 1 S 2 2 3 3 4 1 S 3 L DDVEL TOTAL LNS 9 9 U I/ 19 93 63 It 12 19 19 23 77 92 Z A W CO
BETWEEN SIPHON AND MANHOLE RISER nDIUL CRSTRUCTmV ,HINT y W JW a
a 0 DIMENSIOIS ASNI CpICRETE gIANTIT[ES ~ 6 REBAR P IMETER FRAME ~ 2' x 2' X 2~ ELEVATION ~ P>PE y ~ ~ i
Y ~ 45' ELBOW ° CQ901 DDENSR]NS SIIYiE %PE DOUBLE PIPE J W A H B"~ DIP DRNN PIPE (5LF) D H a G T s L rol N L rm
J NWSE 348.00 _ - ON SIPHON 7• ) e IY 3'-3' 1'-8' 2'-9' t W f M! S'i' 0.7 2'-2' 7'-B' Ul W U A ~ W 18' 3'-1' '-10' 3'-2' tYt ll' G'-1' lA 2'-7' -il' L3 Z Q
Q a 2' 2/' /'-Y Y-1' 4-1' 3' l0' B'-9' 43 3'-S' t'-Y 81 ~ 30' Y-D' it-6' 1'-7' IW IM! 9'-Y 23 r-3' 3'-S' 31
1 36' S'-3' 2'-A' Yi' I W NYl 1'-D' 34 S'-0' G'-D' 1.3 8" 42' G'-2' 3'-t' G'-1' SVY I K -8' 17 '-ID' 8'i' 6A
p 1 7' (TYP.) cU 6 FT. DIAMETER ItM G'-9. 3'-S' Y-2' IW 114 1'-r 6A G'-2' '-r 8A 1 ~3
MANHOLE RISER u~ "SEE SLEET 3 838,1 O vZ
(PRE-CAST SECTIONS) b ° tri m NOTES oy ALL STEPS SNALL PROTRUDE 4' FRON INSIDE FACE DF STRUCTURE VALL.
m m ~ 8" DUl PLUG VALVE 6 FT. DIAMETER 8' II 3000 PSI CI II II 4• STEPS DIFFERING IN OIMCNSIONS, CONFIGURATION DR MATERIALS FRDN TNDSE SHOWN NAY ALSO irE USED PROVIDED THE COIITRACTdt HAS FURNISHED 3000 PSI CONCRETE THE ENGINEER VITH DETAILS OF THE PROPOSED STEPS AND HAS RECEIVED VRITTEN APPROVAL FROM THE ENG11ffER FOR TILE LASE OF SUCH STEPS Z~=~
LOWER INVERT MANHOLE RISER v 51PHON EL 345.17 ° (SEE OUTLET STRUCTURE a oo°a=z
o ~ MATERIAL SPECIFlCATIONS) (PRE-CAST SECTIONS) 7- t' ~ W~Z 2 I 1-U~p,~.,-,
m 3' ] F=F W 3' ~ N~o°~
~ GASKET WALL ° SLEEVE ° 5LF 8"Q DIP ~ L
~ 36" DIA. ° ; 0-RING RCP aA PLAN ~ W
O~ ° 3 CONCRETE ANTI-FLOTATION BLOCK PAN SIDE ~ ~ SIDE (SEE CROSS SECTION) ~ ELEVATION - ELEVATION Vj 'PROJBC'f N0..
8 DIA PLUG VALVE _ ~ WKS-98DDD L ' °W
r, 2.5 FT. (TYP.) (SEE OUTLET STRUCTURE a 36' DIA. MATERIAL SPECIFlCATIONS) 3~ 2.5 FT. (MIN.) I- /vt ~ CAST IRON Pn,~+au>i: y,~~g8PD1.DWG
m BARREL 0-RING RCP 2 5 ~ 2' [n P ~ I^-~--'I CAST IRON ELEVATION 6'0 LD. MANHHOLE 3 W ELEVATION ~ ? DBS~GNSD HY:
~ INV. EL 342.00 ° T~'P•) ~~G~ q ~
i 8' DIA. DIP a POND DRAIN PIPE a a yEG ~ ~ ~ DRATRa HY: AL
n n 27' ,aA~ 1 ur ~ aim ~ ¢ ~
4 G i / a 6 1` ~ CiuV'D. Q N SCALE:
0 4 NOT TO SCALE
O d Q N NOTE: 6 REBAR ~HALL BE CLASS 50 AND H W = 0 BEDDED 4 INTO CONCRETE BASE T M Q DATE 05-03-01
rn 12.17' d a CIRCULAR CONCRETE Y CIRCULAR CONCRETE a Q EMBEDDED SHALL BE 4QRXE 606LAND SHALL BEN 1/r PLAN SLID SIDE Z INT NCRETE BASE ELEPLAN ELEVATION 'MITE Li < SHEET NO.
m ANTI-FLOTATION "SIDE VIEW„ ANTI-FLOTATION 4 12" Z 12. AROUND PERIMETER OF BASE. CDEI m NOTE- REINFORCING STEEL La C-2
(7 BLOCK BLOCK n Y FRONT VIEW 1!1•
D SECTION A-A 1_„I Nor TO BE USED TN
POND 6 OUTLET STRUCTURE DETAIL POND 6 OUTLET STRUCTURE DETAIL 8 » DRAIN TRASH NTs ' ELEVATION suurMrr sEwl wwlaES. 840,66 ,ASH GUARD DETAI_L__(NTS)- FLFVATinN NlMcADAMS
NTS X FINAL DESIGN - NOT RELEASED FOR CONSTRUCTION

_ ~ / G.
Q ~
~ ~
_ ~Z~z~
1 1 / ~I ~ X36 / ~ 3 j ~ _ a o
~j Z~;~x~
- ~ ---J_ L~ ~_J ~ l C / , , ~ ~---1 , - x Z ~ ~
- - - ~ ~ ~ ~ WATERSHED BOUNDARY ~ ~ ~ a z ~N
/ W. ~j z...d~~. a a o 0
~ \ F ~
' ~ ~ x o
E r ~ ~ I
~ r , / w a a
j -r`~ -f' - ~ 2 ~ ~ SERVICE ROAD ~ ~ z W
»GP ~s
P
/ 3 / 7
- ` ~ ~ / / O ~ / 3~ ~ ~ ~ ~R. 1103
f ~ ~ ~ ~ ,
1
~ \ ~ - ~ ~.-~~ATERSHED BOUNDARY / 8
J C / ~ /
o~° ~ ~ ~ ~ i ~ X60 h\G i l NNRE PARKING l~REA ~
~\/r f ~ , \ \ a Q,
~ ~~~~1 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ J r 33 ~ \ \ / O /
! ~ ~ ~ ~ r TO WATER QUALITY POND 1 \ ~ ~
~ ~ ` ~ ~ / ArcEA = 39.13 ACRES I „ ~ o f ~ H'
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ - ~ WATERSHE BOUNDARY a
1 ~ ~ ~ I ~ ~ 1 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~i, ~ ~ ~ a ~ / ~
~
z ~ ~ / z
~ ~
~ t I ~ s
m / , ~ / / / , ~
~ ~ ~
~ l I l f - Y ~ ~ ~ ~ \ ~ Tc THE b
f ~ / I 6
r \ / ~
~ , ~
\
I ~ f/ ~ ~ ~
Q Q S
~ z~
~ 0 ~
Y - T
ice- - -
I~ f / ~ - '

~ / ~ ~ f A
` ~
o~
f,.-. ~ ~ Y ~
PRINT DATE P0"'''~et DA MAP.DWG
f / J / c
/ I MAY I~ 2~' ~ D851GN~ BT: DES
a / , ~ ~ _ ~ mu,~r ax: JES
ma an" K. fACROOM CQ Inc.
t SCALE: 100, -
C> CD
f ? R DATE: 05-04-01
SHEET NO. s W-1
f JjMcADAMs
.