Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout20200260 Ver 1_PCN Form Submission_20200218DWR mrlslon of Water Resources Pre -Construction Notification (PCN) Form September 29, 2018 Ver 3 Initial Review Has this project met the requirements for acceptance in to the review process?* 6 Yes r No Is this project a public transportation project?* G Yes r No Change only if needed. BIMS # Assigned 20200260 Is a payment required for this project?* r No payment required 6 Fee received r Fee needed - send electronic notification Select Project Reviewer* Dave Wanucha:eads\djwanucha Information for Initial Review Version#* 1 Reviewing Office* Winston-Salem Regional Office - (336) 776- 9800 1a. Name of project: BR-0124: Replace Bridge 166 over West Prong Roaring River on SR 1745 (Shumate Mountain Road) 1a. Who is the Primary Contact?* NCDOT 1b. Primary Contact Email:* 1c. Primary Contact Phone:* ekcheely@ncdot.gov (919)707-6108 Date Submitted 2/18/2020 Nearest Body of Water West Prong Roaring River Basin Yadkin-PeeDee Water Classification C Site Coordinates Latitude: 36.294244 A. Processing Information County (or Counties) where the project is located: Wilkes Is this project a public transportation project?* IT Yes r No Is this a NCDOT Project?* IT Yes r No (NCDOT only) T.I.P. or state project number: BR-0124 WBS # (?) 48833.1.1 1a. Type (a) of approval sought from the Corps: Longitude: -81.096802 L.1 W Section 404 Permit (wetlands, streams and waters, Clean Water Act) r Section 10 Permit (navigable waters, tidal waters, Rivers and Harbors Act) 1b. What type(s) of permit(s) do you wish to seek authorization? W Nationwide Permit (NWP) r Regional General Permit (RGP) r Standard (IP) 1c. Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps? r Yes r No Nationwide Permit (NWP) Number: 14 - Linear transportation NWP Numbers (for multiple NWPS): 1d. Type(s) of approval sought from the DWR: W 401 Water Quality Certification - Regular r Non-404 Jurisdictional General Permit r Individual Permit le. Is this notification solely for the record because written approval is not required? For the record only for DWR401 Certification: For the record only for Corps Permit: r 401 Water Quality Certification - Express r Riparian Buffer Authorization 1f. Is this an after -the -fact permit application?* r Yes r No 1g. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for mitigation of impacts? r Yes r No 1g. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for mitigation of impacts? r Yes r No Acceptance Letter Attachment 1h. Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties? r Yes r No 1j. Is the project located in a designated trout watershed? r Yes r No B. Applicant Information 1d. Who is applying for the permit? V Owner r Applicant (other than owner) le. Is there an Agent/Consultant for this project?* r Yes r No 2. Owner Information 2a. Name(s) on recorded deed: NC Department of Transportation 2b. Deed book and page no.: 2c. Responsible party: 2d.Address Street Address 1598 Mail Service Center Address Line 2 city Raleigh Fbstal / Zip Code 27699 2e. Telephone Number: (919)707-6108 2g. Email Address:* State / Rovince / Rion NC Country USA 2f. Fax Number r Yes r No r Yes r No pharris@ncdot.gov C. Project Information and Prior Project History U 1. Project Information 1b. Subdivision name: ff appropriate) 1c. Nearest municipality/ town: Traphill Project Identification 2a. Property Identification Number: 2b. Property size: 2c. Project Address Street Address Address Line 2 (Sty State / Province / Region Postal / Zip Code Country 3. Surface Waters 3a. Name of the nearest body of water to proposed project:* West Prong Roaring River 3b. Water Resources Classification of nearest receiving water:* 3c. What river basin(s) is your project located in?* Yadkin-PeeDee 3d. Please provide the 12-digit HUC in which the project is located. 030401010403 4. Project Description and History 4a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinityof the project at the time of this application:* Surrounding land use is agricultural and residential interspersed with small to large patches of forested areas. 4b. Have Corps permits or DWR certifications been obtained for this project (including all prior phases) in the past?* r Yes r No r Unknown 4d. Attach an 8 1/2 X 11 excerpt from the most recent version of the USGS topographic map indicating the location of the project site. (for DWR) 4e. Attach an 8 1/2 X 11 excerpt from the most recent version of the published County NRCS Soil Survey map depicting the project site. (for DWR) 4f. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property: 0.02 4g. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams on the property: 2,383 4h. Explain the purpose of the proposed project:* The replacement of bridge 166 is part of the Growing Rural Economy and Agriculture through Transportation and Technology Enhancement or Replacement in North Carolina (GREATTER-NC) Project under the United States Department of Transportation's 2018 Better Utilizing Investments to Leverage Development (BUILD) Grant Program. The purpose of the grant and this bridge replacement is to provide transportation infrastructure to support economic development and improve physical and digital connectivity in rural communities in North Carolina. The posted weight restriction on Bridge 166 prohibits large or heavy vehicles, typically used in transporting agricultural and manufactured products, from using the bridge. Vehicles above the posted limit must detour 3.9 miles to avoid the bridge. Replacing this bridge will eliminate posted weight limits by providing a safe crossing for all legal loads and will make accommodations for broadband installation in order to support economic competitiveness. 4i. Describe the overall project in detail, including indirect impacts and the type of equipment to be used:* The proposed project will replace the existing 136 foot -long, two-lane bridge with a new 143 foot -long, two-lane bridge on the same alignment. Traffic will be detoured offsite during construction. Standard road building equipment such as trucks, dozers, and cranes will be used. 4j. Please upload project drawings for the proposed project. BR-0124 Permit Drawings.pdf 3.64MB 5. Jurisdictional Determinations 5a. Have the wetlands or streams been delineated on the property or proposed impact areas?* r Yes r No O Unknown Comments: Of the delineated areas, only two perennial streams (West Prong Roaring River and a UT, Stream SC) are impacted by this project. 5b. If the Corps made a jurisdictional determination, what type of determination was made?* r Preliminary r Approved r Not Verified r Unknown f N/A Corps AID Number: 5c. If 5a is yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas? Name (if known): Nathan Howell, Mary Frazer Agency/Consultant Company: Three Oaks Engineering Other: 5d1. Jurisdictional determination upload 6. Future Project Plans 6a. Is this a phased project?* r Yes r No Are anyother NWP(s), regional general permit(s), or individual permits(s) used, or intended to be used, to authorize any part of the proposed projector related activity? No. D. Proposed Impacts Inventory 1. Impacts Summary la. Where are the impacts associated with your project? (check all that apply): r Wetlands W Streams -tributaries r Buffers r- Open Waters r Pond Construction 3. Stream Impacts 3a. Reason for impact (?) 3b.lmpact type * 3c. Type of impact* 3d. S. name * 3e. Stream Type * Type of 3gSwidth * 3h. ImpactM ❑ �[3f. urisdiction* length* S1 Site 1 - Temporary turbidity Temporary Other West Prong Roaring River Perennial Both 50 5 curtains for bridge Average (feet) (linearfeet) replacement S2 Site 1 - Bank stabilisation Permanent Bank Stabilization West Pron Roaring River 9 9 Perennial Both 50 51 under bridge Average (feet) (lir�rfeet) S3 Site 2 - Bank stabilization Permanent Bank Stabilization SC ::I Perennial Both 5 63 along pipe ouffall Average (feet) (lirrfeet) 31. Total jurisdictional ditch impact in square feet: 0 31. Total permanent stream impacts: 114 31. Total stream and ditch impacts: 119 31. Total temporary stream impacts: 5 3j. Comments: Temporary impacts total 0.02 acre (which includes an additional 51' of temporary impacts, but these overlap with bank stabilisation impacts). E. Impact Justification and Mitigation 1. Avoidance and Minimization 1a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing the project: The proposed replacement bridge will be on the same alignment as the eAsting bridge, will be slightly longer, and will span the stream. Overall drainage patterns will be maintained. On the end side of the bridge, a traffic bearing grated drop inlet with double frame and grates (2GI) will be placed on both sides of the roadway in the shoulder berm gutter to pick up runoff from the bridge. Deck drains will not discharge directly above water. Class II rip rap abutment protection on both banks of the stream will also be used to prevent future erosion and stream migration. 1b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques: NCDOT will adhere to Best Management Practices for Construction and Maintenance Activities. 2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State 2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State? r Yes r No 2b. If this project DOES NOT require Compensatory Mitigation, explain why: The NCDOT does not propose mitigation for the temporary and bank stabilization impacts related to this project. These impacts do not require permanent fill in the stream bed, therefore, under Section 404 of the Clean Water Act, do not constitute Loss of Waters of the U.S., and are not subject to compensatory mitigation. F. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWR) 1. Diffuse Flow Plan 1a. Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules? r Yes r No If no, explain why: No buffered resources within project area. 2. Stormwater Management Plan 2a. Is this a NCDOT project subject to compliance with NCDOT's Individual NPDES permit NCS000250?* r Yes r No Comments: G. Supplementary Information 1. Environmental Documentation la. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the use of public (federal/state) land?* r Yes r No 1b. If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State (North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?* r Yes r No 1c. If you answered "yes" to the above, has the document review been finalized bythe State Clearing House?* r Yes r No NEPAor SEPA Final Approval Letter BR-0124 CE.pdf 2. Violations (DWR Requirement) 17.72MB 2a. Is the site in violation of DWR Water Quality Certification Rules (15ANCAC 2H .0500), Isolated Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), or DWR Surface Water or Wetland Standards or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)? * r Yes r No 3. Cumulative Impacts (DWR Requirement) 3a. Will this project result in additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?* r Yes r No 3b. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description. Due to the minimal transportation impact resulting from this bridge replacement, this project will neither influence nearby land uses nor stimulate growth. Therefore, a detailed indirect or cumulative effects study will not be necessary. 4. Sewage Disposal (DWR Requirement) 4a. Is sewage disposal required by DWR for this project?* r Yes r Nor N/A 5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement) 5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or habitat?* r Yes r No 5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act impacts?* r Yes r No 5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted. Asheville 5d. Is another Federal agency involved?* r Yes r No 5e. Is this a DOT project located within Division's 1-8? r Yes r No 5f. Will you cut any trees in order to conduct the work in waters of the U.S.? r Yes r No 5g. Does this project involve bridge maintenance or removal? r Yes r No 5g(11). If yes, have you inspected the bridge for signs of bat use such as staining, guano, bats, etc.? r Yes r No If you answered "Yes" to 5g(1), did you discover any signs of bat use? r Yes r No r Unknown 5h. Does this project involve the construction/installation of a wind turbine(s)?' r Yes r No r Unknown 51. Does this project involve (1) blasting, and/or (2) other percussive activities that will be conducted by machines, such as jackhammers, mechanized pile drivers, etc.? r Yes r No If yes, please provide details to include type of percussive activity, purpose, duration, and specific location of this activity on the property. 5j. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical Habitat? As of November 13, 2019, the USFWS lists four protected species for Wilkes County. A biological conclusion for bog turtle is not required, though no suitable habitat is present within the project footprint. USFWS assumes the state is unoccupied by the rusty -patched bumblebee. A memo stating that NCDOT is in compliance with 4(d) with regard to northern long-eared bat was sent to USFWS (Claire Ellwanger) on 1/6/2020. The bridge was assessed for gray bat habitat on 1/9/2020, and there was no evidence of bats (see attached NLEB/MYGR memo). Consultation Documentation Upload BR-0124 NLEB 4(d) MYGR Wilkes.pdf 240.21 KB 6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement) 6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as an Essential Fish Habitat?* r Yes r No 6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact an Essential Fish Habitat?* NMFS County Index 7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement) 7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation status?* r Yes r No 7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?* NEPA documentation 7c. Historic or Prehistoric Information Upload BR-0124 Catawba Indian Nation Response.pdf 8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement) 8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA-designated 100-year floodplain?* r Yes r No 8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination?* FEMA Maps Miscellaneous Comments Miscellaneous attachments not previously requested. BR-0124 Cover Letter.pdf Signature 459.85KB 340.16KB U * R By checking the box and signing below, I certify that: • I have given true, accurate, and complete information on this form; I agree that submission of this PCN form is a "transaction" subject to Chapter 66, Article 40 of the NC General Statutes (the "Uniform Electronic Transactions Act'); • I agree to conduct this transaction by electronic means pursuant to Chapter 66, Article 40 of the NC General Statutes (the "Uniform Electronic Transactions Act'); • I understand that an electronic signature has the same legal effect and can be enforced in the same way as a written signature; AND • I intend to electronically sign and submit the PCN form. Full Name: Michael Anthony Turchy Signature Xt 1"- Date 2/18/2020